1As filed with the Commission on May 29, 2018



File No. 333-___________

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,
Washington, D.C. 20549


POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT #1 TO FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

SEC FILE No.: 333-149048

RISE GOLD CORP.

ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

---------------------------

(Exact nameName of registrantRegistrant as specifiedSpecified in its charter)Charter)


Nevada100030-0692325

NEVADA

1000

20-1769847

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization

incorporation)

(Primary Standard Industrial Classification
Code Number

)

I.R.S.(IRS Employer Identification Number

No.)


Atlantic Resources Inc.Suite 650 - 669 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 0B4
Canada

#606 – 610 Granville Street

Vancouver, B.C. V6A 4C9(604) 260-4577

Telephone:  604-568-0059

Facsimile: 604-568-0061

--------------------------------------------------------------

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)


Corp 95Nevada Business Center, LLC
701 South Carson Street, Suite 200
Carson City, Nevada 89701

2620 Regatta Dr. Suite 102

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128

Telephone: 949-487-2436

Facsimile: 949-218-4176

--------------------------------------------------------------

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copies to:

Dale A. Rondeau, Esq.
Thomas, Rondeau LLP
Suite 1780 - 400 Burrard Street
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3A6
Canada

J. Brad Wiggins, Esq.
SecuritiesLawUSA, PC
1875 Century Park East, 6th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067

Approximate date of ascommencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this proposed sale to the public:      Registration Statement.registration statement becomes effective.


If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box.      | X |box: x


If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. |   |o


If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. |   |o


If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. |   |o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or a small reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2an emerging growth company:

Large Accelerated Filer oAccelerated Filer oNon-Accelerated Filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company x
Emerging Growth Company x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section (7)(a)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act (Check one):


Large accelerated filer   |   |

Accelerated filer

|    |

Non-accelerated filer

|   |

Smaller reporting company

| X |



2




CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED


AMOUNT TO BE REGISTERED


PROPOSED MAXIUM OFFERING PRICE PER SHARE (1)


PROPOSED MAXIMUM AGGREGATE OFFERING PRICE (2)


AMOUNT OF REGISTRATION FEE (2)



Common Stock

$85,000

$0.05

$85,000

$9.10


(1)

Based on the last sales price on April 26, 2007.

(2)

Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457 under the Securities Act.o

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE*


Title of Each Class of
Securities to be
Registered
 Amount to be
Registered(1)
  Proposed
Maximum
Offering Price
Per Share
  Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price
  Amount of
Registration
Fee
 
Common Stock offered by selling stockholders  42,927,517  $0.08185 (2) $3,513,617 (2) $437.45 (2)
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders exercisable at CDN$0.40 per share  2,655,184  $0.3103 (3) $823,904 (3) $102.58 (3)
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders exercisable at CDN$0.25 per share  5,516,333  $0.1939 (4) $1,069,617 (4) $133.17 (4)
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders exercisable at CDN$0.15 per share  35,161,000  $0.1164 (5) $4,092,740 (5) $509.55 (5)
                 
Total  86,260,034      $9,499,876  $1,182.75 (6)

(1)Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act, the shares of Common Stock being registered hereunder include such indeterminate number of shares as may be issuable with respect to the shares being registered hereunder as a result of stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions.
(2)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act. The proposed maximum offering price per share and proposed maximum aggregate offering price are based upon the average of the high and low prices of the Common Stock as of May 24, 2018 as quoted on the OTCQB of $0.08185.

(3)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) based on the highest exercise price of the warrants of CDN$0.40 per share converted into United States dollars based on the exchange rate of one Canadian dollar to U.S. dollars as reported by the Bank of Canada on May 24, 2018 of CDN$ to US$0.7757.

(4)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) based on the highest exercise price of the warrants of CDN$0.25 per share converted into United States dollars based on the exchange rate of one Canadian dollar to U.S. dollars as reported by the Bank of Canada on May 24, 2018 of CDN$1.00 to US$0.7757.

(5)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) based on the highest exercise price of the warrants of CDN$0.15 per share converted into United States dollars based on the exchange rate of one Canadian dollar to U.S. dollars as reported by the Bank of Canada on May 24, 2018 of CDN$1.00 to US$0.7757.

(6)A fee of $1,182.75 is being paid concurrently with the filing of this registration statement.

*All dollar amounts in this table refer to U.S. Dollars unless otherwise noted.

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the commission,Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.


2


SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, Dated November 5, 2009



3




PROSPECTUS

ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

1,700,000 SHARES

COMMON STOCK

----------------

The selling shareholders named in this prospectus are offering all of the shares of common stock offered through this prospectus.


Our common stock is presently not traded on any market or securities exchange.

----------------


The purchase of the securities offered through this prospectus involves a high degree of risk.  See Section Entitled “Risk Factors” on pages 6-8

The information contained in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. WeThe selling stockholders may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it isthe selling stockholders are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permittedpermitted.

Subject To Completion, Dated May 29, 2018

(RISE GOLD CORP LOGO)

86,260,034 Shares of Common Stock

This prospectus relates to the resale or other disposition from time to time by certain selling stockholders, as further described in this prospectus, of up to an aggregate of 86,260,034 shares of the Common Stock (the “Shares”) of Rise Gold Corp. (the “Company”, “Rise”, “we”, “us” or “our”). The Shares registered for sale are as follows:

42,927,517 Shares held by selling stockholders;
2,138,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on December 23, 2016 and exercisable at a price per Share of $0.40;
517,184 Shares issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on May 5, 2017 and exercisable at a price per Share of $0.40;
5,383,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on December 27, 2017 and exercisable at a price per Share of $0.25;
133,333 Shares issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on January 3, 2018 and exercisable at a price per Share of $0.25; and
35,161,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on April 18, 2018 and exercisable at a price per Share of $0.15.

The Shares and warrants held by the selling shareholders willstockholders were issued to such selling stockholders pursuant to private transactions between our company and the selling stockholders. The selling stockholders may sell ouror otherwise dispose of the Shares covered by this prospectus or interests therein on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These dispositions may be at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices throughat the facilitiestime of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market price, at varying prices determined at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices. Additional information about the selling stockholders, and the times and manner in which they may offer and sell Shares under this prospectus, is provided in the sections entitled “Selling Stockholders” and “Plan of Distribution” of this prospectus.

We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the OTC Bulletin Board or at privately negotiated prices.Shares by the selling stockholders.


Our Common Stock is listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange (the “CSE”) under the symbol “RISE” and quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “RYES”. On May 18, 2018, the closing sales price of our Common Stock was $0.11 per share on the CSE and US$0.08 per share on the OTCQB. You are urged to obtain current market quotations of the Common Stock.

All dollar amounts reflected herein refer to Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.

3

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined under federal securities laws and, as such, may elect to comply with certain reduced public company requirements for future filings.

Investing in the Shares involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 15 of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of thesethe securities offered hereby or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


----------------


The Date Of This Prospectus Is: November 5, 2009date of this prospectus is May _____, 2018



4



Table Of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS

 

GLOSSARY OF TERMS6

Page

SELECTIVE GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS
7

Summary

CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATES

5

10

Risk Factors

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

6

11

-1

If we do not obtain additional financing, our business will fail

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

6

12

-2

Because we have only recently commenced business operations, we face a high risk of business failure

About the Company

6

12

-3

Because of the speculative nature of exploration of mining properties, there is substantial risk that our business will fail

The Offering


7

13

-4

Because our continuation as a going concern is in doubt, we will be forced to cease business operations unless we can generate profit in the future.

RISK FACTORS


7

14

-5

Because of the inherent dangers involved in mineral exploration, there is a risk that we may incur liability or damages, which could hurt our financial position and possibly result in the failure of our business.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


7

24

-6

Even if we discover commercial reserves of precious metals on the Victoria Vein Mining claim, we may not be able to successfully obtain commercial production

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS


7

25

-8

Because our directors have other business interests, they may not be able or willing to devote a sufficient amount of time to our business operations, causing our business to fail

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION


8

30

-9

Because our directors have no technical experience in mineral exploration, our business has a high risk of failure

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK


8

32

-10

A purchaser is purchasing penny stock which limits the ability to sell stock

BUSINESS

8

34

Use of Proceeds

PROPERTIES

8

40

Determination of Offering Price

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 9

62

Dilution

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

 9

62

Selling Securityholders

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 9

63

Plan of Distribution

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

11

67

Legal Proceedings

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

13

69

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

13

72

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

14

75

Description of Securities

LEGAL MATTERS

15

76

Interest of Named Experts and Counsel

INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

16

77

Disclosure of Commission Position of Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

16

77

Organization Within Last Five Years

INFORMATION INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

16

77

Description of Business

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

16

F1

5

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

April 2018 Warrants” means common stock purchase warrants issued on April 18, 2018, exercisable at a price of $0.15 per share until April 18, 2021;

Common Stock” means the issued and unissued shares of our common stock with a par value of US$0.001;

CSE” means the Canadian Securities Exchange;

December 2016 Warrants” means common stock purchase warrants issued on December 23, 2016, exercisable at a price of $0.40 per share until December 23, 2018;

December 2017 Warrants” means common stock purchase warrants issued on December 27, 2017, exercisable at a price of $0.25 per share until December 27, 2019;

Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

I-M Mine Property” means the Idaho-Maryland Mine Property comprising approximately 93 acres (38 hectares) surface land and approximately 2,800 acres (1,133 hectares) mineral rights located near Grass Valley of Nevada County in northern California, USA.

I-M Mine Project” means Rise’s gold project located on the I-M Mine Property;

Indata Property” means certain mineral claims known as the Indata Property, located in the Omineca Mining Division in British Columbia, Canada in which the Company previously held an option to acquire up to a 75% interest;

January 2018 Warrants” means common stock purchase warrants issued on January 3, 2018, exercisable at a price of $0.25 per share until January 3, 2020;

Klondike Properties” means the portfolio of seven gold and base metal properties in southeast British Columbia, Canada consisting of 150 mineral claims over 28,000 hectares;

May 2017 Warrants” means common stock purchase warrants issued on May 5, 2017, exercisable at a price of $0.40 per share until May 5, 2019;

NI 43-101” means National Instrument 43-101 (Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects);

OTCQB” means the U.S. OTCQB Venture Market administered by OTC Markets Group;

Report” means the NI 43-101 compliant technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Idaho-Maryland Project, Grass Valley, California, USA” dated June 1, 2017 prepared by Greg Kulla, P.Geo. of Amec Foster Wheeler Americas Limited;

Securities Act” means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended;

6

SELECTIVE GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS

accretion– Process by which material is added to a tectonic plate or landmass. This material may be sediment, volcanic arcs, seamounts or other igneous features.

albite– A kind of plagioclase mineral within the feldspar group with formula NaAlSi3O8. Its colour is white to grey.

amphibolite– A gneiss or schist largely made up of amphibole and plagioclase minerals.

ankerite– A calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese carbonate mineral of the group of rhombohedral carbonates.

arsenic– Chemical element with the symbol As and occurs in many minerals, usually in combination with sulfur and metals, but also as a pure elemental crystal.

azimuth-The direction or bearing defined as a horizontal angle measured clockwise from true north

carbonate– Class of sedimentary rocks composed primarily of carbonate minerals; the two major types are limestone and dolomite.

chalcopyrite– A sulphide mineral of copper common in the zone of secondary enrichment.

chlorite– Group name for about 10 related minerals and a member of the mica group of minerals. Chlorite is very common, and is often an uninteresting green mineral coating the surface of more important minerals.

en-echelon– Roughly parallel but staggered structures.

epizonal– Depth of formation of an orogenic deposit (<6 km / <3.7 mi).

facies– The characteristics of a rock unit that reflect its environment of deposition and allow it to be distinguished from rock deposited in an adjacent environment.

foliation– Repetitive layering in metamorphic rocks; the thickness of the layers can vary.

footwall– The rock on the underside of a vein or mineralized structure.

free gold – Gold, uncombined with other minerals, found in a pure state.

free milling – Mineralized material of gold from which the precious metals can be recovered by concentrating methods without resorting to pressure leaching or other chemical treatment.

gabbro– A dark, coarse-grained igneous rock.

galena– Lead sulphide, the most common form of lead.

gangue– The worthless minerals in an mineralized deposit.

greenschist– Metamorphic rocks that formed under the lowest temperatures and pressures usually produced by regional metamorphism, typically 300–450 °C (570–840 °F) and 2–10 kilobars (14,500–58,000 psi).

hangingwall– The rock on the upper side of a vein or mineralized deposit.

hydrothermal– Relating to hot fluids circulating in the earth’s crust.

hydrothermal gold deposit – During the reaction between mineral-bearing hydrothermal fluids and wall-rocks, some elements are concentrated in specific locations to form hydrothermal gold deposits. They are usually controlled by faults or shear structures, occurring as veins and stockworks, or by strata.

hypozonal– Depth of formation of an orogenic deposit (>12 km / >7.5 mi).

intrusive– A body of igneous rock formed by the consolidation of magma intruded into other rocks, in contrast to lavas, which are extruded upon the surface.

Jura-Triassic arc belt– One of the geologic packages of the Sierra Nevada Foothills belt which consists of a Paleozoic basement of disrupted ophiolite, serpentinite mélange, and ultra-mafic rocks overlain by uppermost Triassic-Early Jurassic arc volcanics and coeval 200 Ma intrusive rocks.

lithology– Description of its physical characteristics of a rock unit at outcrop, in hard or core samples or with microscopy, such as colour, texture, grain size, or composition.

7

low-sulphide au-quartz vein– Gold-bearing quartz veins and veinlets with minor sulphides crosscutting a wide variety of host rocks and are localized along major regional faults and related splays. The wallrock is typically altered to silica, pyrite and muscovite within a broader carbonate alteration halo.

mafic– Igneous rocks composed mostly of dark, iron- and magnesium-rich minerals.

mariposite– A mineral which is a chromium-rich variety of mica, which imparts an attractive green colour to the generally white dolomitic marble in which it is commonly found.

mélange– A large-scale breccia, a mappable body of rock characterized by a lack of continuous bedding and the inclusion of fragments of rock of all sizes, contained in a fine-grained deformed matrix.

matrix– Finer-grained mass of material wherein larger grains, crystals or clasts are embedded.

meta-volcanic rocks – A type of metamorphic rock that was first produced by a volcano, either as lava or tephra and then buried underneath subsequent rock and subjected to high pressure and temperatures, causing the rock to recrystallize.

mesothermal quartz vein – Also known as and are type-examples of low-sulfide Au-quartz vein deposits.

mesozonal– Depth of formation of an orogenic deposit (6–12 km / 3.7-7.5 mi).

metamorphosed– Rocks which have undergone a change in texture or composition as the result of heat and/or pressure.

mill head grade – The grade of the mineralized material which is fed into the processing plant to be concentrated into gold bullion. The mill head grade includes mining dilution from un-mineralized rock adjacent to the veins. The mill head grade does not account for metallurgical recovery of gold during the processing of the mineralized material.

ophiolitic rock – An assemblage of the Earth’s oceanic crust and the underlying upper mantle that has been uplifted and exposed above sea level and often emplaced onto continental crustal rocks.

orogeny– An episode of intense deformation of the rocks in a region, generally accompanied by metamorphism and plutonic activity.

orogenic gold deposit – Dominantly form in metamorphic rocks in the mid- to shallow crust (5-15 km depth), at or above the brittle-ductile transition, in compressional settings that facilitate transfer of hot gold bearing fluids from deeper levels. The term “orogenic” is used because these deposits likely form in accretionary and collisional orogens.

Paleozoic– Geological era that followed the Precambrian and during which began with the appearance of complex life, as indicated by fossils (from 245 to 570 million years ago).

pyrite– A yellow iron sulphide mineral, normally of little value. It is sometimes referred to as “fool’s gold”.

quartz– Common rock-forming mineral consisting of silicon and oxygen.

sedimentary rock – Secondary rocks formed from material derived from other rocks and laid down under water. Examples are limestone, shale, and sandstone.

serpentinite– Type of metamorphic rock composed mostly of mineral serpentine. It is usually dark green to green-black in colour, massive and macroscopically dense.

schistosity– Geological foliation (metamorphic arrangement in layers) with medium to large grained flakes in a preferred sheetlike orientation.

scheelite– A variously colored mineral, CaWO4, found in igneous rocks and a common form of tungsten.

sericite– A fine grained mica and a common alteration mineral of orthoclase or plagioclase feldspars in areas that have been subjected to hydrothermal alteration typically associated with hydrothermal deposits.

splay– A series of branching faults near the termination of a major fault which spread the displacement over a large area.

stope– An excavation in a mine from which mineralized material is, or has been extracted.

8

tectonism– Geological term used to describe major structural features and the processes that create them, including compressional or tensional movements on a planetary surface that produce faults, mountains, ridges, or scarps.

terrane– A crustal block or fragment that is typically bounded by faults and that has a geologic genesis distinct from those of surrounding areas.

Tertiary– Former term for the geologic period from 65 million to 2.6 million years ago, a timespan that occurs between the superseded Secondary period and the Quaternary.

thermal gradient – Rate of increasing temperature with respect to increasing depth in the Earth’s interior.

ultra-mafic– Igneous and meta-igneous rocks with a very low silica content, composed entirely or almost entirely of ferromagnesian minerals, and are composed of usually greater than 90% mafic minerals.

winze– A vertical or inclined underground working that has been excavated from the top downward.

ABBREVIATIONS

ImperialMetric

Compliance with Government Regulation

19

Plan of Operations

AC

21

acres
mmeter

Description of Property

SF

22

square foot
kmkilometer

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

lb

22

pound
hahectare

Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

oz

22

ounce
ggrams

Executive Compensation

mi

23

mile
kgkilogram

Financial Statements

ft

23

foot
gptgrams per tonne

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

25




CONVERSIONS

5

Imperial to MetricMetric to Imperial
Imperial MeasureMetric UnitMetric MeasureImperial Unit
2.47 acres1 hectare0.4047 hectare1 acre
3.28 feet1 metre0.3048 metre1 foot
0.62 mile1 kilometre1.609 kilometres1 mile
0.03215 troy ounce1 gram31.1035 grams1 troy ounce
0.02917 troy ounce per ton1 gpt34.2857 gpt1 troy ounce per ton
1.102 short ton1 tonne0.907 tonne1 short ton
2.2046 pounds1 kilogram0.4536 kilogram1 pound

9

CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATES



All dollar amounts in this prospectus are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated. Our financial accounts are maintained in Canadian dollars and our financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Some of our material agreements use Canadian dollars and our Common Stock is traded on the CSE in Canadian dollars. As used herein “CDN$” represents Canadian dollars.


SummaryThe following table sets forth the rate of exchange for the Canadian dollar, expressed in United States dollars in effect at the end of the periods indicated, the average of exchange rates in effect during such periods, and the high and low exchange rates during such periods based on daily mid-range exchange rates reported by OANDA Corporation which approximates the Bank of Canada rates for conversion of Canadian dollars into United States dollars:


  Six Months Ended
January 31
 Fiscal Year Ended July 31
Canadian Dollars to U.S. Dollars 2018($) 2017($) 2016($) 2015($)
Rate at end of period 0.8135 0.8014 0.7668 0.7677
Average rate for period 0.7954 0.7555 0.7537 0.8423
High for period 0.8245 0.8042 0.7978 0.9213
Low for period 0.7756 0.7275 0.6848 0.7665

10

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

Prospective investors

This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we filed with the SEC.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. This prospectus is offering to sell, and is seeking offers to buy, the securities only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are urgedpermitted. The information contained in this prospectus speaks only as of the date of this prospectus (unless the information specifically indicates that another date applies), regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the Shares.

We may provide a prospectus supplement containing specific information about the terms of a particular offering by the selling shareholders, or their transferees. The prospectus supplement may add, update or change information in this prospectus. If information in a prospectus supplement is inconsistent with the information in this prospectus, you should rely on the information in that prospectus supplement. You should read both this prospectus and, if applicable, any prospectus supplement hereto. See “Where You Can Find More Information” for more information.

This prospectus includes industry and market data and other information that we have obtained from, or which is based upon, market research, independent industry publications or other publicly available information. Any such data and other information is subject to change based on various factors, including those described below under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.

We have not, and the selling stockholders have not, authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus or in any supplement to this prospectus or free writing prospectus, and neither we nor the selling stockholders take any responsibility for any other information that others may give you. This prospectus is not an offer to sell, nor is it a solicitation of an offer to buy, the securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement or free writing prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front cover of those documents, or that the information contained in any document incorporated by reference is accurate as of any date other than the date of the document incorporated by reference, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of a security. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates.

11

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. It does not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in our Common Stock. You should read this entire prospectus in its entirety.carefully, including the “Risk Factors” and the financial statements and related notes included herein. This prospectus includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” References to “we,” “our,” “Rise,” and the “Company” refer to Rise Gold Corp.


About the Company

We are in the business of mineral property exploration. To date, we have conducted the first phase of exploration on our sole exploration target, the Victoria Vein Mining claim, which is located about 8 kilometers northwest of the north end of Tatlayoko Lake, approximately 250 kilometers west of Williams Lake, British Columbia, Canada. We acquired the property from 1698727 Ontario Inc. for $7,500.

Our objective is to conducta mineral exploration activities on the Victoria Vein Mining claimstage company incorporated in order to assess whether it possesses economic reserves of gold.  We have not yet identified any economic mineralization on the Victoria Vein Mining claim.  Our proposed subsequent exploration programs are designed to search for an economic mineral deposit.


We were incorporated on February 9, 2007, under the laws of the state of Nevada.Nevada, United States. Our principal officescurrent business operations are focused on exploring the I-M Mine Property located at # 606-610 Granville St.,near the community of Grass Valley in Nevada County in northern California. Our management team is headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6C 3T3. Our telephone numberBC, Canada.

We acquired our interest in the I-M Mine Project by exercising an option granted pursuant to an option agreement dated August 30, 2016 (as amended November 11, 2016 and December 23, 2016) with the owners of the property. A more detailed discussion of the I-M Mine Project and of the current status of our business operations is (604) 568-0059.provided under the sections entitled “Business” and “Properties”. We have prepared a technical report outlining an exploration plan which we are currently conducting. This report was created through processing historic data on the I-M Mine Property obtained from the vendors and from historic information in public databases in Nevada County.

The Offering:12


Securities Being Offered

Up to 1,700,000 shares of common stock.

The Offering

Offering Price

Shares Offered By the Selling Stockholders

The selling shareholders will sell86,260,034 Shares of our shares at prevailing market prices through the facilities of the OTC Bulletin Board or at privately negotiated prices.  

Common Stock, including:

Terms of the Offering

The

42,927,517 Shares held by selling shareholders will determine when and how they will sell the common stock offered in this prospectus.

stockholders;

Termination of the Offering

The offering will conclude when all of the 1,700,000 shares

2,138,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of common stock have been sold, the shares no longer need to be registered to be sold or we decide to terminate the registrationpurchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on December 23, 2016 and exercisable at a price per Share of the shares.

$0.40;

517,184 Shares issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on May 5, 2017 and exercisable at a price per Share of $0.40;

Securities Issued and to be Issued

4,700,000 shares

5,383,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of our common stock arepurchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on December 27, 2017 and outstanding asexercisable at a price per Share of the date$0.25;
133,333 Shares issuable upon exercise of this prospectus.  All of the common stock to be sold under this prospectus will be soldpurchase warrants held by existing shareholders.

selling stockholders issued on January 3, 2018 and exercisable at a price per Share of $0.25; and

35,161,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants held by selling stockholders issued on April 18, 2018 and exercisable at a price per Share of $0.15.

Offering PriceDetermined at the time of sale by the selling stockholders.
Use of Proceeds

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock

Shares by selling stockholders covered by this prospectus.

Common Stock Outstanding as of May 18, 2018116,105,982 shares of Common Stock.
Trading SymbolsOur Common Stock is listed on the selling shareholders.

CSE under the symbol “RISE” and quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “RYES”.
Risk FactorsInvesting in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors”.

13

RISK FACTORS

 



6



Summary Financial Information


Balance Sheet


July 31, 2009

(audited)

Cash

$ 1,539

Total Assets

$ 1,539

Liabilities

$16,807

Total Stockholders’ Equity

($15,268)


Statement of Operations


From Incorporation on

February 9, 2007 to July 31, 2009

(audited)


Revenue

$0  

Net Loss and Deficit

($44,468)


Risk Factors


An investmentInvesting in our common stockthe Shares involves a high degree of risk. The following is a discussion ofYou should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the material risks relating to the offering and our business.  You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information contained in this prospectus, before investingdeciding to invest in our common stock.the Shares. If any of the following risks occur,materialize, our business, operating results and financial condition, couldresults of operations, and future prospects will likely be seriously harmed. The tradingmaterially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our common stockthe Shares could decline due to any of these risks, and you maycould lose all or part of your investment.


If we do not obtain additional financing,Risks Related to our business will fail.Company


Our current operating funds are less than necessaryability to complete all intended exploration ofoperate as a going concern is in doubt.

The audit opinion and notes that accompany our financial statements for the Vic Vein Mining claim,years ended July 31, 2017 and therefore2016 disclose a going concern qualification to our ability to continue in business. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that we will needcontinue as a going concern. We are an exploration stage company and we have incurred losses since our inception.

We currently have no historical recurring source of revenue and our ability to obtain additional financing in ordercontinue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to completeraise capital to fund our future exploration and working capital requirements or our ability to profitably execute our business plan. We currentlyOur plans for the long-term return to and continuation as a going concern include financing our future operations through sales of our Common Stock and/or debt and the eventual profitable exploitation of our I-M Mine Property. Additionally, the volatility in capital markets and general economic conditions in the United States and elsewhere can pose significant challenges to raising the required funds. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our consolidated financial statements do not havegive effect to any operationsadjustments required to realize ours assets and we have no income.  As well, wedischarge our liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

We will not receive any funds from this registration.


Ourrequire significant additional capital to fund our business plan calls for significant expenses in connection with the exploration of the Vic Vein claim.  While we have sufficient funds to conduct initial exploration on the claim, we will need additional funds to complete any additional recommended exploration.  Even after completing initial exploration, we will not know if we have a commercially viable mineral deposit.plan.

 

We will requirebe required to expend significant funds to determine whether proven and probable mineral reserves exist at our properties, to continue exploration and, if warranted, to develop our existing properties, and to identify and acquire additional financingproperties to sustaindiversify our business operationsproperty portfolio. We anticipate that we will be required to make substantial capital expenditures for the continued exploration and, if warranted, development of our I-M Mine Property. We have spent and will be required to continue to expend significant amounts of capital for drilling, geological, and geochemical analysis, assaying, and feasibility studies with regard to the results of our exploration at our I-M Mine Property. We may not benefit from some of these investments if we are not successful in earning revenues once exploration is complete.  We do not currently have any arrangements for financing and may not be ableunable to find such financing if required.


Because we have only recently commenced business operations, we face a high risk of business failure.


We have completed the first phase of exploration on the Vic Vein Mining claim. However, we must conduct at least several additional phases of exploration on the claim before we are able to assess whether it contains economic quantities ofidentify commercially exploitable mineral reserves.  Accordingly,

As of January 31, 2018, we have no way to evaluate the likelihood that our business will be successful.  We were incorporated on February 9, 2007 and to date have been involved primarily in organizational activities, the acquisitionhad cash of an interest in the Vic Vein claim$143,375 and a small, initial phaseworking capital deficiency of exploration.  We have not earned any revenues as$1,129, compared to cash of $337,099 and working capital of $185,429 on July 31, 2017. As of the date of this prospectus. Potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by new mineral exploration companies and the high rate of failure of such enterprises. The likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in connection with the exploration of the m ineral properties that we planprospectus, our current planned operational needs are approximately $1,800,000 until July 31, 2018. We currently have sufficient cash on hand to undertake. These potential problems include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration, and additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates.


Prior to completion of our exploration stage, wemeet these planned expenditures. We anticipate that we may need to raise up to $2,000,000 to continue planned operations for the next twelve months from the date of this prospectus. We are actively pursuing such additional sources of debt and equity financing, and while we have been successful in doing so in the past, there can be no assurance we will incur increased operating expenses withoutbe able to do so in the future.



7Our ability to obtain necessary funding for these purposes, in turn, depends upon a number of factors, including the status of the national and worldwide economy and the price of metals. Capital markets worldwide were adversely affected by substantial losses by financial institutions, caused by investments in asset-backed securities and remnants from those losses continue to impact the ability for us to raise capital. We may not be successful in obtaining the required financing or, if we can obtain such financing, such financing may not be on terms that are favorable to us.


14


realizingOur inability to access sufficient capital for our operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or prospects. Sales of substantial amounts of securities may have a highly dilutive effect on our ownership or share structure. Sales of a large number of shares of our Common Stock in the public markets, or the potential for such sales, could decrease the trading price of the shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through future sales of Common Stock. We have not yet commenced commercial production at any revenues.of our properties and, therefore, have not generated positive cash flows to date and have no reasonable prospects of doing so unless successful commercial production can be achieved at our I-M Mine Property. We therefore expect to continue to incur significant lossesnegative investing and operating cash flows until such time as we enter into successful commercial production. This will require us to deploy our working capital to fund such negative cash flow and to seek additional sources of financing. There is no assurance that any such financing sources will be available or sufficient to meet our requirements. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to raise equity capital or to secure additional debt financing, or that we will not continue to incur losses.

We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects.

Since our inception, we have had no revenue from operations. We have no history of producing products from any of our properties. Our I-M Mine Project is a historic, past-producing mine with very little recent exploration work. Advancing our I-M Mine Property into the foreseeabledevelopment stage will require significant capital and time, and successful commercial production from the I-M Mine Property will be subject to completing feasibility studies, permitting and re-commissioning of the mine, constructing processing plants, and other related works and infrastructure. As a result, we are subject to all of the risks associated with developing and establishing new mining operations and business enterprises including:

completion of feasibility studies to verify reserves and commercial viability, including the ability to find sufficient ore reserves to support a commercial mining operation;
the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting and construction of infrastructure, mining and processing facilities;
the availability and costs of drill equipment, exploration personnel, skilled labor, and mining and processing equipment, if required;
the availability and cost of appropriate smelting and/or refining arrangements, if required;
compliance with stringent environmental and other governmental approval and permit requirements;
the availability of funds to finance exploration, development, and construction activities, as warranted;
potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, local groups or local inhabitants that may delay or prevent development activities;
potential increases in exploration, construction, and operating costs due to changes in the cost of fuel, power, materials, and other supplies; and
potential shortages of mineral processing, construction, and other facilities related supplies.

The costs, timing, and complexities of exploration, development, and construction activities may be increased by the location of our properties and demand by other mineral exploration and mining companies. It is common in exploration programs to experience unexpected problems and delays during drill programs and, if commenced, development, construction, and mine start-up. In addition, our management and workforce will need to be expanded, and sufficient housing and other support systems for our workforce will have to be established. This could result in delays in the commencement of mineral production and increased costs of production. Accordingly, our activities may not result in profitable mining operations and we may not succeed in establishing mining operations or profitably producing metals at any of our current or future properties, including our I-M Mine Property.

15

We have a history of losses and expect to continue to incur losses in the future.

We have incurred losses since inception, have had negative cash flow from operating activities, and expect to continue to incur losses in the future. We have incurred the following losses from operations during each of the following periods:

$1,517,127 for the six month period ended January 31, 2018;
$4,190,955 for the year ended July 31, 2017; and
$633,466 for the year ended July 31, 2016.

We expect to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as one of our properties enters into commercial production and generates sufficient revenues to fund continuing operations. We recognize that if we are unable to generate significant revenues from developmentmining operations and dispositions of the Vic Vein Mining claim and the production of minerals from the claim,our properties, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations.


There is no history upon which At this early stage of our operation, we also expect to base any assumption as toface the likelihoodrisks, uncertainties, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies at the start-up stage of their business development. We cannot be sure that we will provebe successful and it is doubtful that we will generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations. If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks and uncertainties and our business will most likely fail.failure to do so could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition.

 

BecauseRisks Related to Mining and Exploration

The I-M Mine Property is in the exploration stage. There is no assurance that we can establish the existence of any mineral reserve on the I-M Mine Property or any other properties we may acquire in commercially exploitable quantities. Unless and until we do so, we cannot earn any revenues from these properties and if we do not do so, we will lose all of the speculative naturefunds that we expend on exploration. If we do not discover any mineral reserve in a commercially exploitable quantity, the exploration component of exploration of mining properties, there is a substantial risk that our business willcould fail.


The search for valuable minerals as a business is extremely risky. The likelihoodWe have not established that any of our mineral claim containing economic mineralizationproperties contain any mineral reserve according to recognized reserve guidelines, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to do so.

A mineral reserve is defined by the SEC in its Industry Guide 7 as that part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally extracted or reservesproduced at the time of goldthe reserve determination. In general, the probability of any individual prospect having a “reserve” that meets the requirements of the SEC’s Industry Guide 7 is extremely remote.  Exploration for minerals is a speculative venture necessarily involving substantial risk.  In all probability, the Vic Vein claim doessmall, and our mineral properties may not contain any reserves“reserves” and any funds that we spend on exploration could be lost. Even if we do eventually discover a mineral reserve on one or more of our properties, there can be no assurance that they can be developed into producing mines and that we can extract those minerals. Both mineral exploration and development involve a high degree of risk, and few mineral properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.

The commercial viability of an established mineral deposit will depend on a number of factors including, by way of example, the size, grade, and other attributes of the mineral deposit, the proximity of the mineral deposit to infrastructure such as processing facilities, roads, rail, power, and a point for shipping, government regulation, and market prices. Most of these factors will be lost.  As well, problemsbeyond our control, and any of them could increase costs and make extraction of any identified mineral deposit unprofitable.

The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured losses.

Exploration for and the production of minerals is highly speculative and involves much greater risk than many other businesses. Most exploration programs do not result in the discovery of mineralization, and any mineralization discovered may not be of sufficient quantity or quality to be profitably mined. Our operations are, and any future development or mining operations we may conduct will be, subject to all of the operating hazards and risks normally incidental to exploring for and development of mineral properties, such as, but not limited to:

16

economically insufficient mineralized material;
fluctuation in production costs that make mining uneconomical;
labor disputes;
unanticipated variations in grade and other geologic problems;
environmental hazards;
water conditions;
difficult surface or underground conditions;
industrial accidents;
metallurgic and other processing problems;
mechanical and equipment performance problems;
failure of dams, stockpiles, wastewater transportation systems, or impoundments;
unusual or unexpected rock formations; and
personal injury, fire, flooding, cave-ins and landslides.

Any of these risks can materially and adversely affect, among other things, the development of properties, production quantities and rates, costs and expenditures, potential revenues, and production dates. If we determine that capitalized costs associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we would incur a write-down of our investment in these interests. All of these factors may result in losses in relation to amounts spent that are not recoverable, or that result in additional expenses.

Commodity price volatility could have dramatic effects on the results of operations and our ability to execute our business plan.

The price of commodities varies on a daily basis. Our future revenues, if any, will likely be derived from the extraction and sale of base and precious metals. The price of those commodities has fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years, and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control including economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global and regional consumptive patterns, speculative activities and increased production due to new extraction developments and improved extraction and production methods. The effect of these factors on the price of base and precious metals, and therefore the economic viability of our business, could negatively affect our ability to secure financing or our results of operations.

Estimates of mineralized material and resources are subject to evaluation uncertainties that could result in project failure.

Our exploration and future mining operations, if any, are and would be faced with risks associated with being able to accurately predict the quantity and quality of mineralized material and resources/reserves within the earth using statistical sampling techniques. Estimates of any mineralized material or resource/reserve on any of our properties would be made using samples obtained from appropriately placed trenches, test pits, underground workings, and intelligently designed drilling. There is an inherent variability of assays between check and duplicate samples taken adjacent to each other and between sampling points that cannot be reasonably eliminated. Additionally, there also may be unknown geologic details that have not been identified or correctly appreciated at the current level of accumulated knowledge about our properties. This could result in uncertainties that cannot be reasonably eliminated from the process of estimating mineralized material and resources/reserves. If these estimates were to prove to be unreliable, we could implement an exploitation plan that may not lead to commercially viable operations in the future.

Any material changes in mineral resource/reserve estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a property into production and a property’s return on capital.

As we have not completed feasibility studies on our I-M Mine Property and have not commenced actual production, mineralization resource estimates may require adjustments or downward revisions. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by future feasibility studies and drill results. Minerals recovered in small scale tests may not be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.

17

Our exploration activities on our properties may not be commercially successful, which could lead us to abandon our plans to develop our properties and our investments in exploration.

Our long-term success depends on our ability to identify mineral deposits on our I-M Mine Property and other properties we may acquire, if any, that we can then develop into commercially viable mining operations. Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks, and is frequently non-productive. These risks include unusual or unexpected geologic formations, and other conditionsthe inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment, or labor. The success of commodity exploration is determined in part by the following factors:

the identification of potential mineralization based on surficial analysis;
availability of government-granted exploration permits;
the quality of our management and our geological and technical expertise; and
the capital available for exploration and development work.

Substantial expenditures are involved inrequired to establish proven and probable reserves through drilling and analysis, to develop metallurgical processes to extract metal, and to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. Whether a mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. In such a case, we would be unable to complete our business plan.  


Because our continuation as a going concern is in doubt, wedeposit will be forced to cease business operations unless we can generate profit in the future.


The report of our independent accountant to our audited financial statements for the period ended July 31, 2009 indicates that there arecommercially viable depends on a number of factors that raise substantial doubt aboutinclude, without limitation, the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade, and proximity to infrastructure; commodity prices, which can fluctuate widely; and government regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals, and environmental protection. We may invest significant capital and resources in exploration activities and may abandon such investments if we are unable to identify commercially exploitable mineral reserves. The decision to abandon a project may have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities and the ability to continueraise future financing.

We are subject to significant governmental regulations that affect our operations and costs of conducting our business and may not be able to obtain all required permits and licences to place our properties into production.

Our current and future operations, including exploration and, if warranted, development of the I-M Mine Property, do and will require permits from governmental authorities and will be governed by laws and regulations, including:

laws and regulations governing mineral concession acquisition, prospecting, development, mining, and production;
laws and regulations related to exports, taxes, and fees;
labor standards and regulations related to occupational health and mine safety; and
environmental standards and regulations related to waste disposal, toxic substances, land use reclamation, and environmental protection.

Companies engaged in exploration activities often experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a going concern.  Such factors identified in the report are that we have no source of revenue and our dependence upon obtaining adequate financing. If we are not able to continue as a going concern, it is likely investors will lose all of their investment.


Becauseresult of the inherent dangers involvedneed to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits may result in enforcement actions, including the forfeiture of mineral exploration, there is a riskclaims or other mineral tenures, orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities requiring operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or costly remedial actions. We cannot predict if all permits that we may incur liabilityrequire for continued exploration, development, or damages,construction of mining facilities and conduct of mining operations will be obtainable on reasonable terms, if at all. Costs related to applying for and obtaining permits and licenses may be prohibitive and could delay our planned exploration and development activities. We may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of our mineral exploration or our mining activities, if any, and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of, or our failure to comply with, such laws, regulations, and permits.

Existing and possible future laws, regulations, and permits governing operations and activities of exploration companies, or more stringent implementation of such laws, regulations and permits, could have a material adverse impact on our business and cause increases in capital expenditures or require abandonment or delays in exploration.

18

Our I-M Mine Property is located in California and has numerous clearly defined regulations with respect to permitting mines, which could hurtpotentially impact the total time to market for the project.

Although we are currently focused on mineral exploration at the I-M Mine Project and are not contemplating the permitting or the re-opening of the I-M Mine at this time, Nevada County would likely be the lead agency for permitting of an underground mine based on our preliminary review of the regulatory framework. Both parcels fall within the City of Grass Valley’s Sphere of Influence. As such, the County of Nevada may consult with the City of Grass Valley before authorizing uses within the Sphere of Influence. During the process of certain permitting applications in the early 2000s, which were focussed on the Idaho land adjacent to the City of Grass Valley, the City of Grass Valley became the lead agency and proposed to annex the project into the City.

Subsurface mining is allowed in the Nevada County M1 Zoning District with approval of a “Use Permit”. Approval of a Use Permit for mining operations requires a public hearing before the County Planning Commission, whose decision may be appealed to the County Board of Supervisors. Use Permit approvals include conditions of approval, which are designed to minimize the impact of conditional uses on neighboring properties.

In 1975, the California Legislature enacted the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (“SMARA”), which required that all surface mining operations in California have approved reclamation plans and financial positionassurances. SMARA was adopted to ensure that land used for mining operations in California would be reclaimed post-mining to a useable condition. Pursuant to SMARA, we would be required to obtain approval of a Reclamation Plan and possiblyfinancial assurances from the County for any surface component of the underground mining operation before mining operations could commence. Approval of a Reclamation Plan will require a public hearing before the County Planning Commission.

To approve a Reclamation Plan and Use Permit, the County would need to satisfy the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). CEQA requires that public agency decision makers study the environmental impacts of any discretionary action, disclose the impacts to the public, and minimize unavoidable impacts to the extent feasible. CEQA is triggered whenever a California governmental agency is asked to approve a “discretionary project”. The approval of a Reclamation Plan is a “discretionary project” under CEQA. Other necessary ancillary permits like the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) Streambed Alteration Agreement (if applicable) also triggers CEQA compliance.

In this situation, the lead agency for the purposes of CEQA would be the County. Other public agencies (in charge of administering specific legislation) will also need to approve aspects of the Project, such as the CDFW (the California Endangered Species Act), the Air Pollution Control District (Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (authorized to state governments by the US Environmental Protection Agency) and Report of Waste Discharge). However, CEQA’s Guidelines provide that if more than one agency must act on a project, the agency that acts first is generally considered the lead agency under CEQA . All other agencies are considered “responsible agencies.” Responsible agencies do need to consider the environmental document approved by the lead agency, but will usually accept the lead agency’s document and use it as the basis for issuing their own permits.

Our activities are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase our costs of doing business and restrict our operations.

All phases of our operations are subject to environmental regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that may require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and employees. These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species, and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and future changes in these laws and regulations, may require significant capital outlays and may cause material changes or delays in our operations and future activities. It is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant adverse impact on our properties or some portion of our business, causing us to re-evaluate those activities at that time.

19

Regulations and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in the failure of our business.


The search for valuable minerals involves numerous hazards.  As a result, we may become subject to liability for such hazards, including pollution, cave-ins and other hazards againstincreased operating costs, which we cannot insure or against which we may elect not to insure.  The payment of such liabilities maycould have a material adverse effect on our business.

A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating legislative and/or regulatory changes in response to concerns about the potential impact of climate change. Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us, on our future venture partners, if any, and on our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting, and other costs necessary to comply with such regulations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Given the emotional and political significance and uncertainty surrounding the impact of climate change and how it should be dealt with, we cannot predict how legislation and regulation will ultimately affect our financial position.condition, operating performance, and ability to compete. Furthermore, even without such regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation. The potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain, and could be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate and may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, changing sea levels, and changing temperatures. These impacts may adversely impact the cost, production, and financial performance of our operations.


EvenLand reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive.

Although variable depending on location and the governing authority, land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance.

Reclamation may include requirements to:

control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents;
treat ground and surface water to drinking water standards; and
reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance land forms and vegetation.

In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with our potential development activities, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development programs. We plan to set up a provision for our reclamation obligations on our properties, as appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial position could be adversely affected.

We face intense competition in the mining industry.

The mining industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases. As a result of this competition, some of which is with large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and with greater financial and technical resources than ours, we may be unable to acquire additional properties, if any, or financing on terms we discoverconsider acceptable. We also compete with other mining companies in the recruitment and retention of qualified managerial and technical employees. If we are unable to successfully compete for qualified employees, our exploration and development programs may be slowed down or suspended. We compete with other companies that produce our planned commercial reserves of precious metals on the Vic Vein Mining claim,products for capital. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital, our exploration and development programs may be jeopardized or we may not be able to successfully commence commercialacquire, develop, or operate additional mining projects.

A shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

We are dependent on various supplies and equipment to carry out our mining exploration and, if warranted, development operations. Any shortage of such supplies, equipment, and parts could have a material adverse effect on our ability to carry out our operations and could therefore limit, or increase the cost of, production.


20

Joint ventures and other partnerships, including offtake arrangements, may expose us to risks.

We may enter into joint ventures, partnership arrangements, or offtake agreements, with other parties in relation to the exploration, development, and production of the properties in which we have an interest. Any failure of such other companies to meet their obligations to us or to third parties, or any disputes with respect to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on us, the development and production at our properties, including the I-M Mine Property, and on future joint ventures, if any, or their properties, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial performance, cash flows and the price of our Common Stock.

We may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified management to meet the needs of our anticipated growth, and the failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We are dependent on a relatively small number of key employees and consultants, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. The Vic Vein claim doesloss of any officer could have an adverse effect on us. We have no life insurance on any individual, and we may be unable to hire a suitable replacement for them on favorable terms, should that become necessary.

Our results of operations could be affected by currency fluctuations.

Our properties are currently all located in the United States and while most costs associated with these properties are paid in U.S. dollars, a significant amount of our administrative expenses are payable in Canadian dollars. There can be significant swings in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar, which can impact various aspects of our operations. There are no plans at this time to hedge against any exchange rate fluctuations in currencies.

Title to our properties may be subject to other claims that could affect our property rights and claims.

There are risks that title to our properties may be challenged or impugned. Our I-M Mine Property is located in California and may be subject to prior unrecorded agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.

We may be unable to secure surface access or purchase required surface rights.

Although we obtain the rights to some or all of the minerals in the ground subject to the mineral tenures that we acquire, or have the right to acquire, in some cases we may not containacquire any known bodiesrights to, or ownership of, mineralization. If our exploration programs are successful in establishing quartz dioritethe surface to the areas covered by such mineral tenures. In such cases, applicable mining laws usually provide for rights of access to the surface for the purpose of carrying on mining activities; however, the enforcement of such rights through the courts can be costly and gold of commercial tonnagetime consuming. It is necessary to negotiate surface access or to purchase the surface rights if long-term access is required. There can be no guarantee that, despite having the right at law to access the surface and grade,carry on mining activities, we will require additional fundsbe able to negotiate satisfactory agreements with any such existing landowners/occupiers for such access or purchase of such surface rights, and therefore we may be unable to carry out planned mining activities. In addition, in ordercircumstances where such access is denied, or no agreement can be reached, we may need to placerely on the Vic Vein claim into commercial production.assistance of local officials or the courts in such jurisdiction the outcomes of which cannot be predicted with any certainty. Our inability to secure surface access or purchase required surface rights could materially and adversely affect our timing, cost, or overall ability to develop any mineral deposits we may locate.

Our properties and operations may be subject to litigation or other claims.

From time to time our properties or operations may be subject to disputes that may result in litigation or other legal claims. We may be required to take countermeasures or defend against these claims, which will divert resources and management time from operations. The costs of these claims or adverse filings may have a material effect on our business and results of operations.

21

We do not currently insure against all the risks and hazards of mineral exploration, development, and mining operations.

Exploration, development, and mining operations involve various hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, metallurgical and other processing problems, unusual or unexpected rock formations, structural cave-ins or slides, flooding, fires, and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions. These risks could result in damage to or destruction of mineral properties, facilities, or other property, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in operations, increased cost of operations, monetary losses, and possible legal liability. We may not be able to obtain such financing.


Because our directors have other business interests, theyinsurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums or at all. We may elect not be able or willing to devote a sufficient amount of timeinsure where premium costs are disproportionate to our business operations, causingperception of the relevant risks. The payment of such insurance premiums and of such liabilities would reduce the funds available for exploration and production activities.

Risks Related to the Shares

Our share price may be volatile and as a result you could lose all or part of your investment.

In addition to volatility associated with equity securities in general, the value of your investment could decline due to the impact of any of the following factors upon the market price of the Shares:

Disappointing results from our exploration efforts;
Decline in demand for our Common Stock;
Downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates or changes in general market conditions;
Technological innovations by competitors or in competing technologies;
Investor perception of our industry or our prospects; and
General economic trends.

In the last 12 months, the price of our businessstock on the CSE has ranged from a low of $0.085 to fail.a high of $0.315. In addition, stock markets in general have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, and the market prices of securities have been highly volatile. These fluctuations are often unrelated to operating performance and may adversely affect the market price of the Shares. As a result, you may be unable to sell any Shares you acquire at a desired price.


Our president, Mr. Raffi Khorchidian, intends to devote approximately 30% of his business time providing his services to us.  While our director presently possess adequate time to attend to our interests, it is possible that the demandsWe have never paid dividends on our director from their other obligations could increase with the result that they would no longer be ableCommon Stock.

We have not paid dividends on our Common Stock to devote sufficient timedate, and we do not expect to the management of our business.


A purchaser is purchasing penny stock which limits his or her ability to sell the stock.


The shares offered by this prospectus constitute penny stock under the Exchange Act.  The shares will remain penny stockpay dividends for the foreseeable future. The classificationWe intend to retain our initial earnings, if any, to finance our operations. Any future dividends on Common Stock will depend upon our earnings, our then-existing financial requirements, and other factors, and will be at the discretion of penny stock makes it more difficult for a broker-dealer to sell the stock into a secondary market, thus limiting investment liquidity.  Any broker-dealer engaged by the purchaser for the purpose of selling his or her sharesBoard.

Investors’ interests in our company will be subjectdiluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share of Common Stock if we issue additional employee/director/consultant options or if we sell additional Common Stock and/or warrants to rules 15g-1 through 15g-10 of the Exchange Act.  Rather than creating afinance our operations.

In order to further expand our operations and meet our objectives, any additional growth and/or expanded exploration activity will likely need to comply with those rules, some broker-dealersbe financed through sale of and issuance of additional Common Stock, including, but not limited to, raising funds to explore the I-M Mine Property. Furthermore, to finance any acquisition activity, should that activity be properly approved, and depending on the outcome of our exploration programs, we likely will



8



refuse also need to attemptissue additional Common Stock to sell penny stock.


Forward-Looking Statements


This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.finance future acquisitions, growth, and/or additional exploration programs of any or all of our projects or to acquire additional properties. We use words such as anticipate, believe, plan, expect, future, intend and similar expressions to identify such forward-looking statements.  You should not place too much reliance on these forward-looking statements.  Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks faced by us describedwill also in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this prospectus.


Use Of Proceeds


We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock offered through this prospectus by the selling shareholders.



Determination Of Offering Price


The selling shareholders will sell our shares at prevailing market prices through the facilities of the OTC Bulletin Board or at privately negotiated prices.  


Dilution


The common stockfuture grant to be sold by the selling shareholders is common stock that is currently issued and outstanding.  Accordingly, there will be no dilution to our existing shareholders.


Selling Security Holders


The selling shareholders named in this prospectus are offering all of the 1,700,000 shares of common stock offered through this prospectus.  These shares were acquired from us in private placements that were exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933. The shares include the following:



1.

1,200,000 shares of our common stock that the selling shareholders acquired from us in an offering that was exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 and was completed on March 14, 2007;


2.

500,000 shares of our common stock that the selling shareholders acquired from us in an offering that was exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 and was completed on April 26, 2007;


The following table provides as of the date of this prospectus, information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock held by each of the selling shareholders, including:


1.

the number of shares owned by each prior to this offering;

2.

the total number of shares that are to be offered for each;

3.

the total number of shares that will be owned by each upon completion of the

offering; and

4.

the percentage owned by each upon completion of the offering.






Name of Selling Stockholder



Shares Owned Prior to this Offering

Total Number of Shares to be Offered for Selling Shareholders Account


Total Shares Owned Upon Completion of this Offering


Percent Owned Upon Completion of this Offering

Patricia Comeau

5569 Keith St

Burnaby,BC V5J 3C4


200,000


200,000


Nil


Nil



9






Ophelia Sahakian

4127 Virginia Cr.

North Vancouver,BC V7R 3Z7


200,000


200,000


Nil


Nil

Leon Khorchidian

#811-828 Howe St.

Vancouver,BC  V6Z 2X2


200,000


200,000


Nil


Nil

Vartouhy Khorchidian

10550-154A St.

Surrey,BC  


200,000


200,000


Nil


Nil

Alan Sahakian

919 Broadview Dr.

North Vancouver,BC V7H 2E9


200,000


200,000


Nil


Nil

Taline Giragosian

1127 Carnaby Place

North Vancouver,BC  V7H 2A2


200,000


200,000


Nil


Nil

Rob Oslic

11380 Surrey Road

Surrey,BC  V3R 5T3


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Henry Peters

2224 Petrie Ct.

Coquitlam,BC  V3K 6E7


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Jack Khorchidian

335 E. 26th St.

North Vancouver,BC


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Laura Corinne Oslic

11380 Surrey RD

Surrey,BC  V3R 5T3


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

 Jim Platis

8860 Bairdmore Cres

Richmond,BC  V7C 1M7


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Loutfig Demirjian

BST-919 Broadview Drive

North Vancouver,BC  V7M 2E9


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

 Raffi Donabedian

8191 Fairbrook Cr.

Richmond,BC  V7C 1Z2


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Garine Demirdjian

919 Broadview Dr.

North Vancouver,BC  V7H 2E9


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Patty Yeterian

3002 W. King Edward Ave.

Vancouver,BC  V6L 1V3


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Jean Jacques Donabedian

8191 Fairbrook Cres.

Richmond,BC  V7C 1Z2


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil



10






Zare Giragosian

1127 Carnaby Place

North Vancouver,BC V7H 2A2


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Dick Lau

#1026-470 Granville st.

Vancouver,BC  V6C 1V5


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Bobbie Brockelmann

2224 Petrie Cre

Coquitlam,BC V3K 6E7


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Sossi Dakessian

BST-919 Broadview Drive

North Vancouver,BC  



20,000



20,000



Nil



Nil

Vahik Sahakian

4127 Virginia Cr.

North Vancouver,BC  V7R 3Z7


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Remon Jubran

103-10698 151 A st.

Surrey,BC  V3R 8T5


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

John Arabatlian

18515 56A Ave

Surrey,BC V3S 8J3


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Tamar Demirdjian

919 Broadview Dr.

North Vancouver,BC  V7H 2E9


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Marcello Leone

6387 Churchhill Street

Vancouver,BC V6M 3H8


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Carla G. Leone

6387 Churchhill St.

Vancouver,BC V6M 3H8


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Kevin White

6-9339 Alberta Rd.

Richmond,BC  V6Y 4E3


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Sean Comeau

1401-1050 Burrard st.

Vancouver,BC


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Rob Harris

706-3771 Bartlett Court

Burnaby,BC


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Randall Andrus

4720 Woodley Dr.

West Vancouver, BC  V7S 3A1


20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil

Aghavne Sahakian

919 Broadview Dr.

North Vancouver,BC V7H 2E9


       20,000


20,000


Nil


Nil



11







Each of the above shareholders beneficially owns and has sole voting and investment over all shares or rights to the shares registered in his or her name.  The numbers in this table assume that none of the selling shareholders sells shares of common stock not being offered in this prospectus or purchases additional shares of common stock, and assumes that all shares offered are sold.  The percentages are based on 1,700,000 shares of common stock outstanding on the date of this prospectus.


None of the selling shareholders:


(1)

has had a material relationship with us other than as a shareholder at any time within the past three years;


(2)

has ever been one of our officers or directors; or


(3)

is a broker-dealer or affiliate of a broker dealer.


Plan Of Distribution


The selling shareholders may sell some or all of our directors, officers, and key employees and/or consultants options to purchase Common Stock as non-cash incentives. The issuance of any equity securities could, and the issuance of any additional Common Stock will, cause our existing stockholders to experience dilution of their common stockownership interests.

22

If we issue additional Common Stock or decide to enter into joint ventures with other parties in oneorder to raise financing through the sale of equity securities, investors’ interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share of Common Stock depending on the price at which such securities are sold.

The issuance of additional shares of Common Stock may negatively impact the trading price of our securities.

We have issued Common Stock in the past and will continue to issue Common Stock to finance our activities in the future. In addition, newly issued or more transactions, including block transactions.  Such salesoutstanding options, warrants, and broker warrants to purchase Common Stock may be exercised, resulting in the issuance of additional Common Stock. Any such issuance of additional Common Stock would result in dilution to our stockholders, and even the perception that such an issuance may occur in private transactions arranged by each selling shareholder in accordance with resale exemptions in applicable jurisdictions or throughcould have a negative impact on the facilitiestrading price of the Common Stock.

We are subject to the continued listing criteria of the CSE, and our failure to satisfy these criteria may result in delisting of our Common Stock from the CSE and could also jeopardize our continued ability to trade in the United States on the OTCQB.

Our Common Stock is currently listed for trading on the CSE. In order to maintain the listing on the CSE or any other securities exchange we may trade on, we must maintain certain financial and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to objective standards, these exchanges may delist the securities of any issuer if, in the exchange’s opinion, our financial condition and/or operating results appear unsatisfactory; if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to make continued listing inadvisable; if we sell or dispose of our principal operating assets or cease to be an operating company; if we fail to comply with the listing requirements; or if any other event occurs or any condition exists which, in their opinion, makes continued listing on the exchange inadvisable.

If the CSE or any other exchange were to delist the Common Stock, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of trading market for the Common Stock, reduced liquidity, decreased analyst coverage, and/or an inability for us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations. In addition, our inability to maintain our CSE listing and remain current in our Canadian public disclosure requirements could disqualify us from continuing to trade in the United States on either the OTCQB or the OTC Bulletin Board at prevailing prices.  Pink.


We are an “emerging growth company,” and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our Common Stock less attractive to investors.

We are bearing all costs relatingan “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to the registrationbe an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of the common stock.  The selling shareholders, however, will pay any commissions orexemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other fees payablepublic companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to brokers or dealers in connection with any sale of the common stock.


The selling shareholders must comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act in the offer and saleSection 404 of the common stock. In particular, during such timesSarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our Common Stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any July 31 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the selling shareholdersfollowing January 31. We cannot predict if investors will find our Common Stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be deemeda less active trading market for our Common Stock and our stock price may be more volatile. Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will not be engagedsubject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

23

Broker-dealers may be discouraged from effecting transactions in our Common Stock because it is considered a distribution of the commonpenny stock and therefore be consideredis subject to be an underwriter, they must comply with applicable law and may, among other things:


1.

Not engage in any stabilization activities in connection with our common stock;


2.

Furnish each broker or dealer through which commonthe penny stock may be offered, such copies of this prospectus, as amended from time to time, as may be required by such broker or dealer; and


3.

Not bid for or purchase any of our securities or attempt to induce any person to purchase any of our securities other than as permitted under the Exchange Act.rules.

 

Our Common Stock is currently considered a “penny stock.” The Securities Exchange CommissionSEC has also adopted rulesRule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities withhas a market price of(as defined) less than $5.00 (other than securities registered onper share, subject to certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the Nasdaq system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securitiesexceptions. Our Common Stock is providedcovered by the exchangepenny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors.” The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or system).


individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from thosethe rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Commission, which:


1

contains a description ofSEC, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of riskrisks in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading;

2

contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation of such duties;

3

contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including "bid" and "ask"  prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price;

4

contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions;

5

defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading penny stocks; and

6

contains such other information and is in such form (including language, type, size, and format) as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation;



12




stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide prior to proceedingthe customer with any transaction in a penny stock, the customer:


1

withcurrent bid and offer quotations for the penny stock;

2

details ofstock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction;

3

the number of shares to which such bidtransaction, and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and

4

monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer'scustomer’s account.


The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules;these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, apurchaser’s written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.the transaction. These disclosure requirements willmay have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for our Common Stock and, as a result, the ability of broker-dealers to trade in our Common Stock.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information discussed in this prospectus includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this prospectus concerning, among other things, planned capital expenditures, future cash flows and borrowings, pursuit of potential acquisition opportunities, our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, future exploration activities, future mineral resource estimates, and future joint venture arrangements are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are identified by the use of terms and phrases such as “may,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” “believe,” “intend,” “achievable,” “anticipate,” “will,” “continue,” “potential,” “should,” “could,” “would”, “might” and similar terms and phrases.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, risks related to:

our requirement of significant additional capital;
our limited operating history;
our history of losses;
our properties that are in the exploration stage;
mineral exploration and production activities;
our lack of mineral production from our properties;
our exploration activities being unsuccessful;
our ability to obtain permits and licenses for production;
government and environmental regulations that may increase our costs of doing business or restrict our operations;
proposed legislation that may significantly affect the mining industry;
land reclamation requirements;
competition in the mining industry;
equipment and supply shortages;
current and future joint ventures and partnerships;
our ability to attract qualified management;

24

currency fluctuations;
claims on the title to our properties;
surface access on our properties;
potential future litigation;
our lack of insurance covering all our operations; and
our Common Stock, including price volatility, lack of dividend payments, dilution and penny stock rules.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under “Risk Factors” in this prospectus. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated, or expected. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as required by law.

USE OF PROCEEDS

This prospectus relates to the sale or other disposition of Shares of our Common Stock by the selling stockholders listed in the “Selling Stockholders” section below, and their transferees. We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of the Shares by the selling stockholders.

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

This prospectus covers the offering of up to 86,260,034 Shares by selling stockholders - this includes Shares acquirable upon exercise of our outstanding warrants.

Selling stockholders are persons or entities that, directly or indirectly, have acquired shares, or will acquire shares from us from time to time upon exercise of certain warrants and options. This prospectus and any prospectus supplement will only permit the selling stockholders to sell the Shares identified in the column “Number of Shares Offered Hereby.”

The selling stockholders may from time to time offer and sell the Shares pursuant to this prospectus and any applicable prospectus supplement. The selling stockholders may offer all or some portion of the Shares they hold or acquire, but only Shares that are currently outstanding or are acquired upon the exercise of certain warrants that are currently outstanding, and in either case included in the “Number of Shares Offered Hereby” column, may be sold pursuant to this prospectus or any applicable prospectus supplement.

The Shares issued to the selling stockholders are “restricted” securities under applicable federal and state securities laws and are being registered to give the selling stockholders the opportunity to sell their Shares. The registration of such Shares does not necessarily mean, however, that any of these Shares will be offered or sold by the selling stockholders. The selling stockholders may from time to time offer and sell all or a portion of their Shares in the over-the-counter market, in negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices.

The registered Shares may be sold directly or through brokers or dealers, or in a distribution by one or more underwriters on a firm commitment or best efforts basis. To the extent required, the names of any agent or broker-dealer and applicable commissions or discounts and any other required information with respect to any particular offer will be set forth in an accompanying prospectus supplement. See “Plan of Distribution.”

Each of the selling stockholders reserves the sole right to accept or reject, in whole or in part, any proposed purchase of the registered Shares to be made directly or through agents. To the extent that any of the selling stockholders are affiliates of our company or are brokers or dealers, they may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act and any commissions received by them and any profit on the resale of the registered shares may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. As of the date of this prospectus,

25

and based on the representations we have received from the selling stockholders, two of the selling stockholders are brokers or dealers or affiliated with brokers or dealers and are identified below. Selling stockholders that are affiliates of our company are also identified below.

The following table sets forth the name of persons who are offering the resale of Shares by this prospectus, the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each person, the number of Shares that may be sold in this offering and the number of shares of Common Stock each person will own after the offering, assuming they sell all of the Shares offered. The information appearing in the table below is based on information provided by or on behalf of the named selling stockholders. We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the Shares by the selling stockholders.

Name Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Prior to this
Offering(1)
 Number of Shares
Offered Hereby(1)
 Shares of Common Stock
Owned After the Offering
           Number  Percent(1)
Accent Capital GMBH(2)  226,000   226,000(3)    0  -
Anita Rovazzi  266,666   266,666(4)  0  -
Bob Cicci  500,000   300,000(5)  200,000  *
Bob Hunchak  515,000   200,000(6)  315,000  -
Courtney Watkins  100,000   100,000   0  -
Daniel Oliver  660,000   660,000(7)  0  -
Darby Investments Inc.(8)  220,000   150,000(9)  70,000  *
David Erfle  200,000   200,000(10)  0  -
Duncan Milne  700,000   600,000(11)  100,000  *
Edward McCann  1,152,000   252,000(12)  900,000  *
EMA GARP Fund L.P.(13)  2,600,000   2,600,000(14)  0  -
Eric Boehnke  1,000,000   1,000,000(15)  0  -
First Canadian Insurance Corp.(16)  664,000   664,000(17)  0  -
G. Scott Paterson  2,666,000   2,666,000(18)  0  -
George E. Coleman Jr. Foundation(19)  800,000   800,000(20)  0  -
Glass Investments Ltd.(21)  1,004,000   1,004,000(22)  0  -
Greg Davison  200,000   200,000(23)  0  -
Hybrid Financial Ltd.(24)  5,800,000   5,800,000(25)  0  -
Interward Capital Corp.(26)  500,000   500,000(27)  0  -
James Kelly  400,000   400,000(28)  0  -
Jason Atkinson  96,000   66,000(29)  30,000  -
Jason Scharfe  434,000   334,000(30)  100,000  -

26

Name Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Prior to this
Offering(1)
 Number of Shares
Offered Hereby(1)
 Shares of Common Stock
Owned After the Offering
           Number  Percent(1)
John LaGourgue  45,000   45,000   0  -
Keith Kerr  484,000   334,000(31)    150,000  -
Kenilworth Estates(32)  400,000   400,000(33)  0  -
Lorne Henderson  200,000   200,000(34)  0  -
Lynette Vetro  200,000   200,000(35)  0  -
Marilyn Wilhelmsen  500,000   400,000(36)  100,000  -
Millennium Insurance Corporation(37)  332,000   332,000(38)  0  -
Monarch Properties Ltd.(39)  7,879,832   3,500,000(40)  4,379,832  3.8
Myrmikan Gold Fund, LLC(41)  3,475,000   3,300,000(42)  175,000  *
Palisade Global Investments Ltd.(43)  10,000,000   10,000,000(44)  0  -
Patricia Mossman  700,000   700,000(45)  0  -
Robbie Morrison  200,000   200,000(46)  0  -
Robert Yoneda  150,000   100,000(47)  50,000  *
Rockhaven Holdings Ltd.(48)  500,000   500,000(49)  0  -
Rudy DeJong  100,000   100,000(50)  0  -
Sarah Paterson  666,000   666,000(51)  0  -
Skanderbeg Capital Advisors Inc.(52)  1,784,368   834,368(53)  950,000  *
Scharfe Holdings Inc.(54)  10,745,206   4,000,000(55)  6,745,206  5.8
Southern Arc Minerals Ltd.(56)  40,000,000   40,000,000(57)  0  -
Sveinson Mineral Services Inc.(58)  300,000   300,000(59)  0  -
Thomas Brinkman  371,000   160,000(60)  211,000  *
Yea-Sayer Pty Ltd.(61)  2,500,000   1,000,000(62)  1,500,000  1.3
Total  102,236,072   86,260,034   15,976,038  13.3

* less than 1%

(1)This table is based upon information supplied by the selling stockholders, which information may not be accurate as of the date hereof. We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a selling stockholder, shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants are included with respect to that stockholder. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the selling stockholders named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws. Applicable

27

percentages are based on 116,105,982 shares of Common Stock outstanding on May 18, 2018, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC.

(2)Joerg Schweitzer is the beneficial owner of these securities.

(3)Includes 138,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2016 Warrants.

(4)Includes 133,333 shares issuable upon exercise of January 2018 Warrants.

(5)Includes 150,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(6)Includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(7)Includes 330,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(8)Dale A. Rondeau and Brenda T. Yamanaka are the beneficial owners of these securities.

(9)Includes 75,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(10)Includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.

(11)Includes 200,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants and 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(12)Includes 126,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(13)Lawrence W. Lepard, the Managing General Partner of EMA, controls these securities.

(14)Includes 1,300,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(15)Includes 500,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(16)Marc Sontrop, President of Interward Asset Management, controls these securities.

(17)Includes 332,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2016 Warrants.

(18)Includes 1,333,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.

(19)Daniel Oliver, the trustee of the Foundation, controls these securities.

(20)Includes 400,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(21)Marc Sontrop, President of Interward Asset Management, controls these securities.

(22)Includes 502,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2016 Warrants.

(23)Includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.

(24)Steve Marshall, the Chief Executive Officer of Hybrid Financial, controls these securities.

(25)Includes 2,900,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

(26)Marc Sontrop, President of Interward Asset Management, controls these securities.

(27)Includes 250,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2016 Warrants.

(28)Includes 200,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.

(29)Includes 33,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.

(30)Includes 167,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.

(31)Includes 167,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.

(32)Janice-Elaine Kilas, President and Chief Executive Officer of Kenilworth Estates, controls these securities.

(33)Includes 200,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.

28

(34)Includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.
(35)Includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of May 2017 Warrants.
(36)Includes 200,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.
(37)Marc Sontrop, President of Interward Asset Management, controls these securities.
(38)Includes 166,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2016 Warrants.
(39)H. Nixon Scharfe, President of Monarch Properties is the beneficial owner of these securities.
(40)Includes 1,500,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants and 500,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2016 Warrants.
(41)Daniel Oliver, the Managing Member of Myrmikan Gold Fund, controls these securities.
(42)Includes 350,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants and 1,300,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.
(43)Collin S. Kettell, the Chief Executive Officer of Palisade Global Investments, controls these securities.
(44)Includes 5,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.
(45)Includes 350,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.
(46)Includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.
(47)Includes 50,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.
(48)Marc Sontrop, a director of Rockhaven Holdings controls these securities.
(49)Includes 250,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2016 Warrants.
(50)Includes 50,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.
(51)Includes 333,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.
(52)Mario Vetro and Carson Seabolt are the beneficial owners of these securities.
(53)Includes 417,184 shares issuable upon exercise of May 2017 Warrants
(54)Brad Scharfe is the beneficial owner of these securities.
(55)Includes 2,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of December 2017 Warrants.
(56)John G. Proust, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Southern Arc, controls these securities.
(57)Includes 20,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.
(58)Frederick Sveinson and Sandra Sveinson are the beneficial owners of these securities.
(59)Includes 150,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.
(60)Includes 80,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.
(61)James Neville Kennard is the beneficial owner of these securities.
(62)Includes 500,000 shares issuable upon exercise of April 2018 Warrants.

None of the Selling Shareholders has, or within the past three years has had, any position, office or material or family relationship with our company or any of our predecessors or affiliates, except as follows:

29

Hybrid Financial Ltd. provides investor relations services to our company under contract.
Jason Scharfe is the brother of Brad Scharfe, a former director of our company.
Monarch Properties Ltd. is owned by H. Nixon Scharfe, the father of Brad Scharfe.
Patricia Mossman is the mother of Benjamin Mossman, the Chief Executive Officer of our company.
Scharfe Holdings Inc. is owned by Brad Scharfe, a former director of our company.
Southern Arc Minerals Ltd. has a director, John G. Proust, in common with our company.
Thomas Brinkman is the brother of Tessa Brinkman, the wife of Benjamin Mossman, the Chief Executive Officer of our company.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering the Shares to permit the resale of those Shares under the Securities Act from time to time after the date of this prospectus at the discretion of the holders of such Shares. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the selling stockholders of the Shares. We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the Shares.

Each selling stockholder and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their Shares on the CSE, the OTCQB, or any other stock becauseexchange, market, quotation service or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions, provided that all applicable Canadian laws, hold periods and other applicable local laws are satisfied. The selling stockholders may also sell their Shares directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers, or agents. If the Shares are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling stockholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions. The Shares may be sold in one or more transactions at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices. A selling stockholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:

ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

privately negotiated transactions;

settlement of short sales entered into after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part;

broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;

through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;

a combination of any such methods of sale; and

any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The selling stockholders may also sell shares pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.

30

Any Shares offered by a selling stockholder by this prospectus that were acquired in the private placement offering that closed on April 18, 2018 remain subject to Canadian resale restrictions which provide that unless permitted under Canadian securities legislation, a selling stockholder must not trade those Shares before August 19, 2018.

If the selling stockholders effect such transactions by selling Shares to or through underwriters, broker-dealers, or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers, or agents may receive commissions in the form of discounts, concessions, or commissions from the selling stockholders or commissions from purchasers of the Shares for whom they may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal (which discounts, concessions, or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers, or agents may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved). Broker-dealers engaged by any selling stockholder may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling stockholder (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.

In connection with sales of Shares or interests therein, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the Shares in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The selling stockholders may also sell shares of Common Stock short and deliver Shares covered by this prospectus to close out their short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales. The selling stockholders may also loan or pledge Shares to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such Shares. The selling stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of Shares offered by this prospectus, which Shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the Shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by, or any discounts or concessions allowed to, any such broker-dealer or agent and any profit on the resale of any Shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. At the time a particular offering of the Shares is made, a prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed that will set forth the aggregate amount of Shares being offered and the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any broker-dealers or agents, any discounts, commissions, and other terms constituting compensation from the selling stockholders and any discounts, commissions, or concessions allowed or re-allowed or paid to broker-dealers.

Each selling stockholder has informed us that it does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the Shares.

Because the selling stockholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, they will be subject to these penny stock rules. Therefore,the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act, including Rule 172 thereunder. Once this registration statement becomes effective we intend to file the final prospectus with the SEC in accordance with SEC Rules 172 and 424. Provided we are not the subject of any SEC stop orders and we are not subject to any cease and desist proceedings, the obligation to deliver a final prospectus to a purchaser will be deemed to have been met.

There is no underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with the proposed sale of the resale shares by the selling stockholders.

Under the securities laws of some states, the Shares may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the Shares may not be sold unless such shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state, or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell any or all of the Shares registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

31

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the Shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the Common Stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the selling stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of our Common Stock by the selling stockholders or any other person. All of the foregoing provisions may affect the marketability of the Shares and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the Shares.

We will pay all expenses of the registration of the Shares, estimated to be approximately US$29,182.75 in total, including, without limitation, Securities and Exchange Commission filing fees, expenses of compliance with state securities or “blue sky” laws, and legal and accounting fees; provided, however, that a selling stockholder will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if any. We will indemnify the selling stockholders against liabilities, including some liabilities under the Securities Act, in accordance with applicable registration rights agreements, if any, or the selling stockholders will be entitled to contribution. We may be indemnified by the selling stockholders against civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, that may arise from any written information furnished to us by the selling stockholder specifically for use in this prospectus, in accordance with the related registration rights agreement, or we may be entitled to contribution.

We agreed to keep this prospectus effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the Shares may be resold by the selling stockholders without registration and without the requirement to be in compliance with Rule 144(c)(1) and otherwise without restriction or limitation pursuant to Rule 144 or (ii) all of the Shares have difficulty selling those securities.been sold pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect.


Description Of SecuritiesOnce sold under the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, the Shares will be freely tradable in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.


GeneralDESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK


Our authorized capital stock consists of 75,000,000400,000,000 shares of common stock atCommon Stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.$0.001.


Common Stock


As of November •, 2009,May 18, 2018, there were 4,700,000are 116,105,982 shares of our common stockCommon Stock issued and outstanding that are held by 32 stockholders of record. outstanding.

Holders of our common stock areCommon Stock have no preemptive rights to purchase additional shares of Common Stock or other subscription rights. The Common Stock carries no conversion rights and is not subject to redemption or to any sinking fund provisions. All of our issued Common Stock is entitled to share equally in dividends from sources legally available, when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, and upon our liquidation or dissolution, whether voluntary or involuntary, to share equally in our assets available for distribution to security holders.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue additional shares of Common Stock not to exceed the amount authorized by our Articles of Incorporation, on such terms and conditions and for such consideration as the Board may deem appropriate without further security holder action.

Voting Rights

Each holder of our Common Stock is entitled to one vote for eachper share on all matters submittedon which such stockholders are entitled to a stockholder vote. Holders of common stock doSince the Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights.  Therefore,rights, the holders of a majoritymore than 50% of the shares of common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors.  Two persons presentdirectors if they choose to do so and, being, or representing by proxy, shareholders are necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting of our stockholders.  A vote byin such event, the holders of a majoritythe remaining shares will not be able to elect any person to the Board of our outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to our articles of incorporation.Directors.


Holders of common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds.  In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock.Dividend Policy


Holders of our common stockCommon Stock are entitled to dividends if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. Since our inception as a company on February 9, 2007, we have no pre-emptive rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions applicablenot

32

declared any dividends, nor do we intend to our common stock.


Preferred Stock


We do not have an authorized class of preferred stock.


Dividend Policy


We have never declared or paidissue any cash dividends on our common stock.  We currently intend to retain futurein the future. Our foreseeable plans include retaining earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of our business.

Warrants

As of May 18, 2018, an aggregate of 85,448,819 warrants, with each warrant convertible into one (1) share of Common Stock, were issued and outstanding as follows:

Number  Exercise Price Expiry Date
 1,500,000  $0.227 July 13, 2018
 22,148,800  $0.40 December 23, 2018
 2,286,100  $0.40 January 24, 2019
 465,500  $0.40 February 6, 2019
 9,863,486  $0.40 May 5, 2019
 7,080,740  $0.25 September 25, 2019
 6,788,860  $0.25 December 27, 2019
 133,333  $0.25 January 3, 2020
 21,000  $0.15 April 18, 2020
 35,161,000  $0.15 April 18, 2021
 85,448,819     

Each of the foregoing warrants provides that in the event there is a subdivision, consolidation, reclassification, or other change to our Common Stock resulting in a greater or lesser number of shares of Common Stock or our other securities, the terms of the Common Stock issuable on conversion of such warrants and the exercise price of such warrants will be adjusted accordingly.

Incentive Stock Options

As of May 18, 2018, an aggregate of 11,610,142 incentive stock options are issued and outstanding, with each option exercisable into one (1) share of Common Stock, as follows:

Option Grant Date Option Exercise Price Option Expiry Date Number of Options
Currently Outstanding
March 23, 2016 $0.15 March 22, 2021  1,100,000 
August 9, 2016 $0.20 August 8, 2021  586,600 
December 27, 2016 $0.24 December 27, 2021  2,142,542 
April 3, 2017 $0.27 April 3, 2022  500,000 
April 20, 2017 $0.28 April 20, 2020  900,000 
April 18, 2018 $0.12 April 18, 2023  6,381,000 
       11,610,142 

Each agreement in respect of incentive stock options provides that in the event there is a subdivision, consolidation, reclassification, or other change to our Common Stock resulting in a greater or lesser number of shares of Common Stock, the terms of the Common Stock issuable on exercise of such options and the exercise price of such options will be adjusted accordingly. Furthermore, the expiry period of each of the foregoing options will be accelerated in

33

the event the holder ceases to hold their applicable position as director, officer, consultant, or employee of our company.

BUSINESS

General Corporate Information

Our company was incorporated on February 9, 2007 as Atlantic Resources Inc. in the state of Nevada pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes. On April 11, 2012, we changed our name to “Patriot Minefinders Inc. On January 14, 2015, we changed our name to “Rise Resources Inc.”. On March 29, 2017, we changed our name to “Rise Gold Corp.”.

On January 14, 2015, we completed a merger with our wholly owned subsidiary, Rise Resources Inc., and formally assumed the subsidiary’s name by filing Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State. The subsidiary was incorporated entirely for the purpose of effecting the name change and the merger did not affect our Articles of Incorporation or corporate structure in any other way.

On January 22, 2015, we completed a 1 for 80 reverse split of our Common Stock and effected a corresponding decrease in our authorized capital by filing a Certificate of Change with the Nevada Secretary of State (the “Reverse Split”). As a result we do not anticipate paying any cash dividendsof the Reverse Split, our authorized capital decreased from 1,680,000,000 shares to 21,000,000 and our issued and outstanding Common Stock decreased from 63,400,000 shares to 792,518, with each fractional share being rounded up to the nearest whole share.

Both the name change and Reverse Split became effective in the foreseeable future.market at the open of business on February 9, 2015.


ShareOn April 9, 2015, we increased our authorized capital from 21,000,000 to 400,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

On March 29, 2017, we completed another merger with our wholly owned subsidiary, Rise Gold Corp., and formally assumed the subsidiary’s name by filing Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State. The subsidiary was incorporated entirely for the purpose of effecting the name change and the merger did not affect our Articles of Incorporation or corporate structure in any other way.

We currently have one wholly owned subsidiary, Rise Grass Valley, Inc., which holds certain of our interests and assets located in the United States, and in particular, our interest in the I-M Mine Property. Rise Grass Valley, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Nevada pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes.

Our Common Stock is currently listed on the CSE under the symbol “RISE”. We are a reporting issuer in British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario in Canada. Our Common Stock is also currently quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “RYES”. We are an SEC reporting company by virtue of our class of Common Stock being registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

Description of Business

We are a mineral exploration company and our primary asset is a major past producing high grade property near Grass Valley, California, United States, which we own outright. In the past, we have held other potential mineral properties in British Columbia, Canada, which have been written off based on the strength of the I-M Mine Project.

On May 18, 2015, we entered into an option agreement (the “Eastfield Option”) with Eastfield Resources Ltd., a British Columbia company with its common shares listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “ETF” (“Eastfield”), pursuant to which Eastfield granted us the exclusive and irrevocable option to acquire up to a 75% undivided interest in and to certain mineral claims known as the Indata property located in the Omineca Mining Division in British Columbia, Canada (the “Indata Property”), by paying Eastfield an aggregate of $450,000 in cash, incurring a minimum of $2,500,000 in aggregate exploration expenditures on the Indata Property, and completing a feasibility study on the property. On May 5, 2017, we terminated the Option Agreement and wrote off $50,000 in acquisition costs relating to Indata during the period ended April 30, 2017.

34

Prior to entering into the Eastfield Option, we were an exploration stage company engaged in exploring and evaluating potential strategic transactions in multiple industries, including but not limited to mineral properties and technology.

On August 1, 2015, we changed our functional currency from the United States dollar to the Canadian dollar.

On October 28, 2015, we cancelled 13,000,186 shares of Common Stock that were originally issued by us through debt conversion agreements on February 11, 2015 and March 31, 2015 pursuant to a share surrender and cancellation agreement.

On January 29, 2016, we completed the issuance and sale of an aggregate of 6,050,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.10 per share in a Canadian public offering in exchange for gross proceeds of $605,000. The shares were qualified for distribution in the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta pursuant to a final long form prospectus we prepared dated November 10, 2015. Pursuant to an agency agreement dated September 22, 2015 between us and one Canadian selling agent, we paid the agent a cash commission equal to 8% of the gross proceeds ($48,400) and issued the agent and one sub-agent an aggregate of 484,000 warrants valued at $42,248 (discount rate – 0.43%, volatility – 215.3%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), each of which was exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.10 per share for a period of 24 months. We also paid the Canadian selling agenta corporate finance fee of $25,000 and incurred other share issuance costs of $53,667.

On February 1, 2016, our Common Stock commenced trading on the CSE.

On May 31, 2016, we entered into a property purchase agreement (the “Klondike Purchase Warrants”) with Klondike Gold Corp., a British Columbia company with its common shares listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “KG” (“Klondike”), regarding the purchase of a portfolio of seven gold and base metal properties in southeast British Columbia consisting of 150 mining claims with a total area of 28,000 hectares (collectively, the “Klondike Properties”). On July 13, 2016 (the “First Closing”), we paid Klondike $50,000 in cash, issued 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock, and issued 1,500,000 share purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $0.227 per share until July 13, 2018. On the one year anniversary of the First Closing, we were required to pay Klondike $150,000 in cash, issue 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock, and issue 1,000,000 additional warrants. In June 2017, we decided to terminate the Purchase Agreement and wrote off $513,031 in acquisition costs relating to the Klondike Properties during the period ended April 30, 2017. Under the terms of a settlement agreement dated July 17, 2017 with Klondike, we agreed to pay $100,000 and return any interests we had in the Klondike Properties in exchange for a release from any future obligations and commitments to Klondike including the issuance of shares and share purchase warrants.


On August 1, 2016, Fred Tejada resigned as our Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors appointed Benjamin W. Mossman as a director and Chief Executive Officer to the fill the vacancy resulting from Mr. Tejada’s resignation.

On August 31, 2016, Michael Evans resigned as a director and the Board of Directors appointed John D. Anderson to fill the director vacancy and the audit committee vacancy resulting from Mr. Evans’ resignation.

On August 30, 2016, we entered into an option agreement with three parties to purchase a 100% interest in and to the I-M Mine Property located near Grass Valley, California, United States. In order to exercise the option, we agreed to pay the vendors US$2,000,000 by November 30, 2016. Upon execution of the option agreement, we paid the vendors a non-refundable cash deposit in the amount of $32,758 (US$25,000), which was to be credited against the purchase price of US$2,000,000 upon exercise of the option. On November 30, 2016, we negotiated an extension of the closing date of the option agreement to December 26, 2016, in return for a cash payment of $32,758 (US$25,000), which also was credited against the purchase price of US$2,000,000 upon exercise of the option. On December 28, 2016, we negotiated a further no-cost extension of the closing date of the option agreement to January 31, 2017. On January 25, 2017, we exercised the option by paying $2,588,625 (US$1,950,000), and acquired a 100% interest in the I-M Mine Property. In connection with the option agreement, we agreed to pay a cash commission of $184,000 (US$140,000) equal to 7 per cent of the purchase price of US$2,000,000; the commission was settled on January 25, 2017 through the issuance of 920,000 units valued at $0.20 per unit, each unit consisting of one share of Common Stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

35

We have notprepared a technical report outlining an exploration plan which we are now preparing to commence. This report was created through processing historic data on the I-M Mine Property obtained from the vendors.

On December 23, 2016, we completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 21,044,500 units at a price of $0.20 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,208,900. Each unit consists of one share of Common Stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, we paid finders fees of $218,410 and issued and do not have outstanding anya total of 1,104,300 finder warrants exercisable into Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On January 6, 2017, we entered into an option agreement with Sierra Pacific Industries Inc. of Anderson, California to purchase a 100% interest in and to certain surface rights totalling approximately 82 acres of land (the “SP Lands”) located contiguous to the I-M Mine Property acquired on January 25, 2017. Pursuant to the option agreement, we were required to pay US$1,900,000 by March 31, 2017 in order to exercise the option. Upon execution of the option agreement, we paid the vendors a non-refundable cash deposit in the amount of $132,732 (US$100,000), which was credited against the purchase price of US$1,900,000 upon exercise of the option. On April 3, 2017, we negotiated an extension of the closing date of the option agreement to June 30, 2017, in return for a cash payment of $268,000 (US$200,000) to extend the option agreement to June 30, 2017, at which time a payment of US$1,600,000 was due in order to exercise the option. On June 7, 2017, we negotiated a further extension of the closing date of the option agreement to September 30, 2017 in return for a cash payment of $406,590 (US$300,000), which was credited against the remaining purchase price. On September 1, 2017, we negotiated a further extension of the closing date of the option agreement to June 30, 2018 in return for cash payments as follows: US$300,000 by September 30, 2017, US$300,000 by December 30, 2017, US$300,000 by March 30, 2018 and a final payment of US$400,000 by June 30, 2018. All of these payments have now been made resulting in our full exercise of the option and purchase of the SP Lands effective as of May 15, 2018.

On January 24, 2017, we completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 1,340,000 units at a price of $0.20 per unit for gross proceeds of $268,000. Each unit consists of one share of Common Stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, we paid finders fees of $5,220 and issued a total of 26,100 finder warrants, each exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On February 6, 2017, we completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 455,000 units at a price of $0.25 per unit for gross proceeds of $113,750. Each unit consists of one share of Common Stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, we paid finders fees of $2,625 and issued a total of 10,500 finder warrants exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On April 20, 2017, Fred Tejada resigned as a director, the President and Secretary and Bradley Scharfe resigned as a director from our Board of Directors. On the same date, our Board of Directors appointed Alan R. Edwards and Thomas I. Vehrs to fill the director vacancies and audit committee vacancies. The Board also appointed Benjamin W. Mossman as our President and Cale Thomas as our corporate secretary to fill the office vacancies resulting from Mr. Tejada’s resignation.

On May 5, 2017, we completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 9,009,814 units at a price of $0.23 per unit for gross proceeds of $2,072,257. Each unit consists of one share of Common Stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, we paid or accrued finders fees of $100,392 and issued a total of 436,488 finder warrants exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On August 8, 2017, we entered into a shares for debt settlement transaction with one of our common stock.




13



Options


We have not issued and do not have outstanding any options to purchase sharescreditors, providing for the settlement of approximately $95,952 of indebtedness through the issuance of an aggregate of 417,184 units of our securities at a deemed issue price of $0.23 per unit. Each unit was comprised of one share of Common Stock

36

and one common stock.stock purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one additional share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 until May 5, 2019.


ConvertibleOn September 25, 2017, we completed the first tranche of a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 7,077,140 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $1,061,571. Each unit consists of one share of Common Stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, we paid or accrued finders fees of $540 and issued a total of 3,600 finder warrants exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On November 28, 2017, our Common Stock began trading on the OTCQB.

On December 11, 2017 the US Securities


We have not issued and do not have outstanding any securities convertible intoExchange Commission declared effective our registration statement on Form S-1 relating to the resale of up to 52,560,780 shares of our common stock held by certain stockholders named in the registration statement.

On December 27, 2017, we completed the second tranche of a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 6,417,000 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $962,550. Each unit consisted of one share of Common Stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, we paid finders fees of $55,779 and issued a total of 371,860 finders’ warrants exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On January 3, 2018, we completed the third and final tranche of a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 133,333 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $20,000. Each unit consisted of one share of Common Stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On April 18, 2018, we completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 35,161,000 units at a price of $0.10 per unit for gross proceeds of $3,516,100. Each unit consisted of one share of Common Stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.15 for a period of three years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, we paid finders fees of $2,100 and issued a total of 21,000 finders’ warrants exercisable into one share of Common stock at a price of $0.15 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On April 18, 2018, Cale Thomas resigned from our Board of Directors and was replaced by John G. Proust. Our Board of Directors also granted a total of 6,381,000 stock options to certain of our employees, consultants and directors pursuant to the terms of our stock option plan. These options are exercisable at $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023.

On April 18, 2018, we entered into a consulting services agreement (the “JPA Agreement”) with J. Proust & Associates (the “Consultant”) pursuant to which the Consultant agreed to provide business advisory, finance, accounting, corporate administrative services and an office to our company to maintain continuous disclosure obligations and comply with public listing requirements on the CSE in Canada. Pursuant to the terms of the JPA Agreement, the Consultant provides such business advisory, finance, accounting and corporate administrative services as we may request from time to time. The Consultant has provided us with personnel for the positions of Chief Financial Officer, treasurer, controller and corporate secretary.

On May 1, 2018, Cale Thomas resigned as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. He was replaced on the same date by the appointment of Vince Boon as Chief Financial Officer and Eileen Au as Corporate Secretary and Treasurer. On May 16, 2018, Ms. Au resigned as Treasurer and Mr. Boon was appointed Treasurer in her stead.

Plan of Operations

As at July 31, 2017, we had a cash balance of $337,099, compared to a cash balance of $139,021 as of July 31, 2016.

37

Our plan of operations for the next 12 months is to continue our current diamond drilling exploration activities at the I-M Mine Property. We plan to continue the recommended work program as outlined in the Report on the I-M Mine Property, which was issued on June 1, 2017.

The I-M Mine Property hosts numerous exploration targets that warrant drilling. While a significant drill program is required to test these targets, our initial plans are to complete the limited exploratory work program described in the Report. Contingent upon available financing, we plan to drill additional targets.

The Report recommended a single 6,000 ft (1,830 m) surface diamond drill hole to provide geological samples from most of the major lithological units on the I-M Mine Property geology. The single hole has been designed to pierce the #1 Vein projection approximately 400 ft (122 m) below the elevation of the I2400 Level and then carry on through the potential western extensions of the Idaho 3 Vein System. The objectives of this drill hole were as follows:

1)Provide a long drill intercept of the Brunswick Block from surface to the Serpentinite contact

2)Test the up-dip area and below the 52 Vein (60 Winze) mineralized area in the Brunswick Block

3)Test the #1 Vein below the I2400 Level

4)Test the serpentinite footwall for potential 3 Vein/Rose Garden analogies

5)Test and obtain samples of ankerite alteration in the serpentinite unit

6)Test for the location of the major Idaho faults

7)Drill through the serpentinite unit to provide further insight on the thickness and geometry of this unit at depth

8)Determine drill hole deviation, drilling productivity, and drilling costs to allow refinement of the design of a major drill program at the I-M Mine Property

In addition, Amec Foster Wheeler has recommended that the digital geological model created by the Rise management team be expanded to include model channel samples, the lithological contacts and structures such as the diabase dikes, ankerite alteration envelopes, minor quartz veins, and all faults mapped by the historic mine operators. This work may provide additional insight into the mineralization controls at the I-M Mine Property.

The cost of the work program was estimated in the Report to be approximately $595,000 as shown in the following table:

Estimated Cost of Recommended Work Program  
Hole Length (m)  1829  m
       
Duration  38  days
       
Drilling Cost $390,000   
       
Mobilization $7,000   
       
Standby charges $40,000   
       
Centrifuge System $36,000   
       
Living Allowance $29,000   
       
Geology & Assaying $38,000   
       
Supplies $15,000   
       
Total Drilling Cost $555,000  =$303/m
       
Geological Modelling $40,000   
       
Total Work Program $595,000   
       

38

On January 3, 2018, we announced the assay results from drill hole B-17-01, the first drill hole of the exploration drilling program at the I-M Gold Project. Diamond drill hole B-17-01 (the “Drillhole”) was completed in November 2017. The Drillhole had a total length of 1419 m (4654 ft) and reached a depth of ~1157 m (3794 ft) below surface. The starting azimuth of the Drillhole was 310 degrees and the ending azimuth was 278 degrees with an average inclination of ~55 degrees. An intercept of 62.7 gpt gold over 2.7 m was intersected in the center vein of the Brunswick #1 Vein Set, approximately 50 m below the B1600 level at a depth of ~540 m below surface. The true width of the intercept is estimated at 1.4 m. The Drillhole intersected three sub-parallel veins at the Brunswick #1 Vein. The B1 Vein Set, including the Center Vein and two sections of internal waste, averaged 12.2 gpt gold over 14.9 m with an estimated true width of 7.8 m.

The Drillhole azimuth deviated significantly from the planned azimuth and, therefore, did not intersect the Idaho #1 Vein at depth as contemplated in the recommended Work Program. The target described in the Report remains untested and will be tested with future drilling.

On April 25. 2018, we announced the recommencement of exploration core drilling at the I-M Gold Project. We plan to drill additional holes in the B1 Vein to follow-up on Drillhole B-17-01. These holes will target an area between the B1600 level and the B2300 level. Historical records report both levels on the B1 Vein to be mineralized. We will also test several other Brunswick veins which are parallel to the B1 Vein. We expect to be drilling the Brunswick targets until approximately mid-June and then we will move the drill to test the Idaho #1 Vein target as recommended in the Technical Report.

We have implemented a quality control program for our drill program to ensure best practices in the sampling and analysis of the drill core. This includes the insertion of blind blanks, duplicates and certified standards. HQ and NQ sized drill core is saw cut with half of the drill core sampled at intervals based on geological criteria including lithology, visual mineralization, and alteration. The remaining half of the core is stored on-site at our warehouse in Grass Valley, California. Drill core samples are transported in sealed bags to ALS Minerals analytical assay lab in Reno, Nevada.

All gold assays were obtained using a method of screen fire assaying. The Historic I-M Mine Project is known to contain ‘coarse’ gold, for which a screen fire assay is the best way to obtain a definitive result. This procedure involves screening a large pulverized sample of up to 1 kg at 100 microns. The entire oversize (including the disposable screen) is fire assayed as this contains the ‘coarse’ gold and a duplicate determination is made on the ‘minus’ 100 micron fraction. A calculation can then be made to determine the total weight of gold in the sample. Any +100 micron material remaining on the screen is retained and analyzed in its entirety by fire assay with gravimetric finish and reported as the Au (+) fraction result. The –100 micron fraction is homogenized and two sub-samples of 50 grams are analyzed by fire assay with AAS finish. If the grade of the material exceeds 10 gpt the sample is re-assayed using a gravimetric finish. The average of the two results is taken and reported as the Au (-) fraction result. All three values are used in calculating the combined gold content of the plus and minus fractions.

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue our proposed exploration activities. For these reasons, our auditors believe that there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.

39

PROPERTIES

I-M Mine Property, California

Our principal mineral property is the I-M Mine Property.

I-M Mine Project

The information in this prospectus with respect to the I-M Mine Property is derived primarily from a technical report prepared in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 (Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects) (“NI 43-101”) mandated by Canadian Securities Regulatory authorities. Entitled “Technical Report on the Idaho-Maryland Project, Grass Valley, California, USA” (the “Report”) and dated June 1, 2017, the Report was prepared by Greg Kulla, P.Geo. (the “Author”) of Amec Foster Wheeler Americas Limited. The Author is an independent Qualified Person for purposes of NI 43-101. The full text of the Report is available for review at our corporate offices located at Suite 650 - 669 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Canada V6C 0B4, and may also be accessed online, under our company’s profile, on the SEDAR website: www.sedar.com. Readers are encouraged to review the Report in its entirety.

Project Location, Description and Access

Property Location

The I-M Mine Property comprises approximately 93 acres (38 hectares) surface land and approximately 2,800 acres (1,133 hectares) mineral rights located near Grass Valley of Nevada County in northern California, USA. The I-M Mine Property is situated in the Grass Valley-Nevada City District along the western slope of the Sierra Nevada, as shown on the overview map and regional map in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively and is located approximately 60 miles northeast of Sacramento, CA and 90 miles west of Reno, NV.

40

Figure 1:Idaho-Maryland Mine Property Location Overview

(GRAPHICS)

41

Figure 2:Idaho-Maryland Mine Property, Regional Map

(GRAPHICS)

42

Property Description

The recorded owner of the surface land and mineral rights associated with the I-M Mine Property, as documented by a Quitclaim Deed recorded by the Nevada County Recorder on the 26th of January 2017 (Document #: 20170001985), is Rise Grass Valley Inc., a Nevada Corporation and subsidiary of Rise Gold Corp. Rise Grass Valley Inc. purchased the I-M Mine Property, inclusive of its mineral rights from the Grantors of the BET Group Estate, as described in the Quitclaim Deed (Document #: 20170001985), on the 25th of January 2017.

Surface Rights

The I–M Mine Property surface rights include two parts of fee simple land, (1) Idaho land representing 56 acres (23 hectares) and (2) Brunswick land representing 37 acres (15 hectares) as displayed in Figure 3.

The I-M Mine Property consists of parcels of surface land located in portions of Section 26 and 36, Township 16 North – Range 8 East Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (MDM) and Section 31, Township 16 North – Range 9 East MDM as detailed in Table 1 and displayed in Figure 3.

Table 1:Idaho-Maryland Mine Property – Surface Land Legal Description

Parcel
Number
DescriptionLot Size
09-550-32SEC 26, TWN 16N, RNG 8E, MDM, PTN N 1/2 26-16-820,908 SF
(0.48 AC)
09-550-37SEC 26, TWN 16N, RNG 8E, MDM, PTN NE 1/4 26-16-84.47 AC
09-550-38SEC 26, TWN 16N, RNG 8E, MDM, PTN NE 1/4 26-16-840.1 AC
09-550-39SEC 26, TWN 16N, RNG 8E, MDM, PTN NE 1/4 26-16-842,668 SF
344 CENTENNIAL DRIVE GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945(0.98 AC)
09-550-40SEC 26, TWN 16N, RNG 8E, MDM, PTN NE 1/4 26-16-85,662 SF
(0.13 AC)
09-560-36SEC 26, TWN 16N, RNG 8E, MDM, PTN N 1/2 SE 1/4 26-16-810.25 AC
09-630-37SEC 36, TWN 16N, RNG 8E, MDM, LOT 6 BET ACRES21.8 AC
09-630-39SEC 36, TWN 16N, RNG 8E, MDM & SEC 31, TWN 16N, RNG 9E, MDM,
LOT 7 BET ACRES
15.07 AC

43

Figure 3:Idaho-Maryland Mine Property, Surface and Mineral Land Holdings

(GRAPHICS)

44

Surface Land Obligations

Fee simple ownership entitles the owner to all rights of a property, which are only restricted by law or private restrictions, such as zone ordinances or covenants. Fee simple owners retain possession of their property permanently, assuming all obligations to the land are met.

The surface land is subject to a tax lien imposed by and payable to Nevada County. The parcels comprising the Idaho land and Brunswick land have a combined annual property tax of $16,126.78 for the fiscal year ending June 30th, 2018. The total amount includes County taxes and Agency taxes. The I-M Mine Property remains in good standing with property taxes paid in full through January 31, 2018.

The Nevada Irrigation District supplies treated water to the I-M Mine Property. Water to the Brunswick land is delivered from the Loma Rica System, while water to the Idaho land is delivered from the E. George System. A nominal service fee is charged.

There are no further interests registered against the title of the surface rights.

Land Designation

The Brunswick land is located approximately 1 to 2 miles southeast of the city limits of the City of Grass Valley in Nevada County. The Idaho land is located on Idaho-Maryland Rd adjacent to the city limits of the City of Grass Valley in Nevada County. The I-M Mine Property in relation to city limits is shown on Figure 3. Due to its proximity, the I-M Mine Property is located within the City of Grass Valley’s planning area boundary, with Brunswick land located in the “Long-term Annexation” and Idaho land located in the “Near-term Annexation” Sphere of Influence. Based on the City of Grass Valley 2020 General Plan, the planned land use designation for the Brunswick land remains “M-1” Manufacturing/Industrial, while the planned land use designation for the Idaho land is “BP” Business Park (CoGV-CDD, 2009).

Each of the parcels of Brunswick land and Idaho land are positioned within the County’s “M1” Light Industrial Zone. Within the “M1” District, surface access to subsurface mining (e.g., vent and escape shafts) is allowed with a Use Permit (Nevada County Code § L-II 3.21.). Mineral exploration, however, is distinct from the definitions of “subsurface mining” and “surface mining.” Exploration involves the search for economic minerals through the use of geological surveys, geophysical or geochemical prospecting, bore holes and trial pits, and surface or underground headings, drifts, or tunnels (NCC § L-II 3.22(B)(5).). Exploration diamond drilling on M1-Industrial Land is an allowed use and does not require a discretionary permit provided that no water is discharged offsite and disturbance per site is less than 1 acre and 1,000 yd3 material (NCC, 2017).

The Project area is private land and no permits or consultations with the US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) or the US Forest Service (USFS) are required.

Mineral Rights

The I-M Mine Property consists of mineral rights on 10 parcels, including 55 subparcels, totaling 2,800 acres (1,133 hectares), of full or partial interest, as detailed in Table 2 and displayed in Figure 4. The mineral rights encompass the past producing I-M Mine Property which includes the Idaho and Brunswick underground gold mines.

The original mineral rights were granted at various times since 1851. Through various patents and agreements since the original grants, there has been a succession of ownership of the mineral rights.

45

The Quitclaim Deed describes the mineral rights as follows:

The I-M Mine Property consists of all rights to minerals within, on, and under the land shown upon the Subdivision Map of BET ACRES, No. 85-7, filed in the Office of the County Records, Nevada County, California, on February 24, 1987, in Book 7 of Subdivisions, at Page 75 et seq.

The I-M Mine Property consists of all rights to minerals within, on, and under the land located in portions of Sections 23, 24, 25, 26, 35, and 36 in Township 16 North – Range 8 East MDM, Sections 19, 29, 30, and 31 in Township 16 North – Range 9 East MDM, and Section 6 in Township 15 North – Range 9 East MDM and all other mineral rights associated with the Idaho-Maryland Mine.

The mineral rights are defined as parcels and subparcels in a Quitclaim Deed (Document #: 20170001985). All property is described in that Quitclaim Deed by Idaho Maryland Industries Inc. in favor of William Ghidotti and Marian Ghidotti, his wife as tenants in common, dated June 10, 1963. The Quitclaim deed is located at vol. 337, pp. 175-196 in the official records of Nevada County, as recorded on June 12, 1963.

Mineral rights pertain to all minerals, gas, oil and mineral deposits of every kind and nature beneath the surface of all such real property, together with all necessary and convenient rights to explore for, develop, produce, extract and take the same, subject to the express limitation that the fore-going exception and reservation shall not include any right of entry upon the surface of said land without the consent of the owner of such surface of said land, as excepted in the Quitclaim Deed recorded the 26th of January 2017 (Document #: 20170001985). Mineral rights are severed from surface rights at a depth of 200 ft (61 m) below surface, with all mineral rights being contiguous below 200 ft (61 m) of surface.

There are no interests registered against or obligations required of the mineral rights of the I-M Mine Property.

46

Figure 4:Idaho-Maryland Mine Property, Surface and Mineral Rights

(GRAPHICS)

47

Property Access

The I-M Mine Property is situated east of the City of Grass Valley and south of Nevada City, in western Nevada County. State Route 49, State Route 20, and State Route 174 (state highways) connect the Grass Valley area regionally. The Brunswick land and the adjacent Mill Site are situated on the south western quadrant of the intersection of the East Bennett Road, a two-lane artery, and Brunswick Road, a major two-lane artery connecting Grass Valley with State Highway 174. Access to the Brunswick land is on Millsite Road via the East Bennet Road, approximately 2.8 miles east of Grass Valley Center. The Idaho land is situated along the Idaho Maryland Road to the south, centered between Railroad Avenue and Brunswick Road. The Idaho land can be accessed by Idaho Maryland Road or Centennial Drive and multiple trails are present across the property.

Agreements

Rise owns a 100% interest in the I-M Mine Property and there are no known royalties on future gold production. There are no other known agreements or encumbrances to which the I-M Mine Property is subject. See “Item 5 – Description of Business – Three Years History – Property Acquisition”.

Environmental Liabilities

Environmental studies have been completed on all the surface holdings owned by Rise. The environmental studies were completed prior to Rise purchasing the Idaho land and Brunswick land.

Idaho Land

In 2016, a Draft Preliminary Endangerment Report on the Idaho Land was prepared for the City of Grass Valley by Geocon Consultants Inc. This report provided conclusions and recommendations to support redevelopment of this site for commercial and industrial use. Geocon noted the metal of greatest concern with respect to potential health risks for future site occupants is arsenic which is present is mine tailings and waste berms located on the site. Geocon noted that the presence of arsenic in mine waste on the site does not currently appear to pose a significant risk to public health or the environment in its current state and that an expedited response action does not appear warranted at this time (Geocon, 2016).

Brunswick Land

In 2007, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Round-Hole and New Brunswick Mine Sites was prepared by Engineering/Remediation Resources Group, Inc. (“ERRG”) for Idaho-Maryland Mining Corporation. The report concluded that there were no current recognized environmental conditions on the I-M Mine Property at the time, although there are suspect environmental concerns regarding spills of hydrocarbons from vandalism at the New Brunswick Shaft, roofing asphalt on the property, debris from illegal dumping on the property boundaries, and the potential for naturally occurring asbestos in serpentinite rocks on the property. ERRG did not complete an analysis to determine if contamination from historic mining and mineral processing was present, although ERRG has recommended further sampling and studies to determine this (ERRG, 2007).

Permits

All parcels included in the I-M Mine Property are within the “M1” Light Industrial Zoning District of Nevada County. Mineral exploration is allowed in M1 Districts subject to zoning compliance and building permit issuance, if required. A Use Permit is only required for mineral exploration if one of the following conditions are triggered:

(a)Overburden or mineral deposits in excess of 1,000 cubic yards are disturbed, or

(b)The operation in any one location exceeds one acre in size, or

48

(c)Dewatering will occur or water will be discharged from the site as a result of the operation.

Additionally, all exploratory operations shall require a reclamation plan and secure adequate financial assurances to ensure site reclamation unless:

(a)Less than 1,000 cubic yards of overburden are disturbed, and

(b)The size of the operation in any one location is one acre or less.

In those instances where a reclamation plan is not required, an erosion control plan as per NCC § L-V 13.14., approved by the Nevada County Planning Department, and a grading permit shall be required for those operations in which 50 cubic yards or more of overburden are disturbed as per NCC § L-II 3.22(D)(2) (NCC, 2017).

A building permit, issued by the County, may be required for construction or installation of drilling facilities. A building permit is a ministerial approval. Ministerial approval is a non-discretionary approval.

Surface exploration drilling will be subject to Nevada County Noise Regulations. The Noise Element of the Nevada County General Plan (2014) establishes maximum allowable exterior noise levels for various land use categories (NC-BOS, 2014).

Other significant risks

No significant factors or risks are currently known to exist which would affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform exploration work on the I-M Mine Property.

History

The Idaho-Maryland Mine (the “I-M Mine”), located in the Grass Valley mining district of northern California was one of the most productive and best known gold mines in the United States, with gold production from the I-M Mine Property dating back to 1863.

The I-M Mine, as it now exists, represents a consolidation of a number of important early day producing mines including Eureka, Idaho, Maryland, Brunswick, and Union Hill Mines. Based on historic production records, the I-M Mine produced a total of 2.4 M oz of gold at an average mill head grade of approximately 0.5 oz/ton (17.1 gpt). The I-M Mine was reportedly the second largest gold mine in the United States in 1941 (Clark, 2005), producing up to 129,000 oz of gold per year before being forced to shut down by the US government in 1942 (Shore, 1943). Due to lack of development, a decline in gold production was experienced and recovery from war-time shutdown never occurred.

Historic Exploration & Mine Development

The I-M Mine has a rich history of mining work completed between 1863 and 1956 by various operators. Extensive exploration and underground mine development was completed during that time on the I-M Mine Property. The I-M Mine Property and its comprehensive collection of original documents was rediscovered in 1990 by Consolidated Del Norte Ventures Inc., the predecessor company of Emgold Mining Corporation (“Emgold”), and efforts were made to reopen the historic mine.

Exploration & Mine Development 1851-1956

Exploration by historic operators from 1851 through to 1956 was mainly completed by lateral exploration (drift development) and raise or winze development. Levels were driven along the strike of the veins to determine their extent. Raises were developed upwards following the dip of the vein and winzes were sunk down along the dip of the vein. Chip samples were assayed for mineralization of the quartz vein. In 1923, the first prospect drill was purchased. Following that, exploration holes were completed ahead of mine development to confirm vein locations and to locate vein extensions.

49

The I-M Mine encompasses a system of underground tunnels, many raises, numerous winzes, four inclined shafts, and two vertical shafts. An estimated equivalent of 72.8 miles (117 km) of underground tunnel occur at the I-M Mine, assuming typical drift dimensions of 7.5 ft x 8.5 ft (W x H).

Based on available historic records, 883 exploratory holes totalling approximately 234,100 ft (71,354 m) were diamond drilled at a diameter of 7/8” (EX-size). Historic drill logs were not available for review and no historic drill core was preserved from past mining operations at the I-M Mine.

Exploration & Mine Development 2003-2004

Emgold and its former entities leased the I-M Mine Property from 1990 to 2013. Development work during this period included completion of a preliminary investigation of the mine records, publishing various technical reports on the I-M Mine Property, leasing or purchasing adjacent properties, various permit applications and associated environmental studies, development of a ceramics technology process, and completion of an exploration program. Emgold was unsuccessful in reopening the historic mine due to inability to raise necessary funding in the midst of unfavourable market conditions.

Emgold completed an exploration program on the I-M Mine Property in 2003 and 2004. Gold exploration consisted of 31 diamond drill holes totalling 21,335 ft (6,502 m) and 7 drill holes totalling 3,537 ft (1,078 m) were completed for geotechnical and ceramics feedstock work.

The surface exploration drill program focused on the westernmost portion of what Emgold termed the Idaho Deformation Corridor, along the Idaho Fault Zone. Exploration drilling was mainly conducted from two sites; 1) west of the Eureka shaft and 2) west of the Idaho shaft, both targeting near surface mineralization around historic workings.

The Emgold diamond drill hole database was acquired by Rise in the purchase of the I-M Mine Property. As per the purchase agreement with the BET Group, ownership transfer of the I-M Mine Property included all historical documents to which the BET Group held rights, inclusive of Emgold data.

50

Production History

Rise has completed a compilation of the mine production data of the I-M Mine during historic operation from 1866 through 1955, the final year of production from the mine. Rise estimates that the I-M Mine produced a total of 2,414,000 oz of gold from 5,298,000 tons of mill feed and that the life of mine average mill head-grade averaged approximately 0.50 oz/ton (17.1 gpt). Total production for the I-M Mine is detailed in Table 3.

Table 3:Total Idaho-Maryland Mine Production from 1866-1955*

 Mined & MilledMill Head GradeMetallurgical
Recovery
YieldGold
Produced
 tonstonnesoz/tongpt%oz/tonoz
Idaho Mine       
#1 Vein978,000887,0001.1238.685%0.96935,000
3 Vein system1,215,0001,102,0000.6020.495%0.56686,000
Total2,193,0001,989,0000.8328.489%0.741,621,000
Brunswick Mine       
Old Brunswick41,00037,0000.5619.385%0.4920,000
Union Hill35,00032,0001.2141.585%1.0336,000
New Brunswick3,029,0002,748,0000.268.895%0.24737,000
Total3,105,0002,817,0000.279.394%0.26793,000
Total I-M Mine5,298,0004,806,0000.5017.191%0.462,414,000

*Details regarding data verification are presented under the heading “Data Verification” below.

In 1926, Errol MacBoyle took over management of the I-M Mine and, as President and General Manager, led the mine into its most successful period of production. A graph of production from the Idaho and Brunswick Mines from 1926 to 1955 is displayed in Figure 5. The historic mine workings of the I-M Mine are displayed in Figure 6.

51

Figure 5:I-M Mine Gold Production from 1926-1955*

(GRAPHICS)

* Details regarding data verification are presented under the heading “Data Verification” below.

52

Figure 6:Idaho-Maryland Mine Workings, Plan View

(GRAPHICS)

53

Mill Head Grade

The mill head grade is the grade of the mineralized material which is fed into the processing plant to be concentrated into gold bullion. The mill head grade includes mining dilution from un-mineralized rock adjacent to the veins. The mill head grade does not account for metallurgical recovery of gold during the processing of the mineralized material.

Data Verification

Detailed production information from the internal records of the I-M Mine is available for the period from 1926 through 1955. Whenever possible, mill reports were reconciled against financial statements and submissions by Idaho Maryland Consolidated Mines, Inc. and Brunswick Consolidated Gold Mining to the US Bureau of Mines. Where reconciliation between documents was possible, only minor variations in production reporting were noted. The entire library of documents is no longer fully complete but there is sufficient material to make an accurate estimate of historic production during this period. The following materials were used to prepare an estimate during the period from 1926-1955:

Idaho Maryland Mines Co. Financial Statements (1926-1932, 1934-1942)

Idaho Maryland Mines Co. Mill Reports (1933-1942, 1946-1950)

Idaho Maryland Mines Co. Final Distributions Sheets (1944, 1945)

Idaho Maryland Mines Co. Breakdown of Income and Expenses (1946-1949)

Idaho Maryland Mines Co. Cost Data & Cost Sheets from (1946-1949)

Idaho Maryland Mines Corp. Lode Mine Production Report to US Bureau of Mines (1944-1945, 1947-1948, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1955)

For the period prior to 1926 there are no internal corporate records regarding historic production. The Author believes this information is reliable but the source documents used by the authors of these documents are not available for reconciliation. The following documents were used to prepare an estimate during the period from 1866-1925:

Lindgren, Waldemar. The Gold Quartz Veins of Nevada City and Grass Valley Districts, California (1896)

Hamilton, Fletcher. Mines and Mineral Resources of Nevada County (1918)

Clark, Jack. Gold in Quartz: The Legendary Idaho Maryland Mine (2005)

Detailed records of metallurgical recoveries from the I-M Mine prior to 1924 are also not available. From 1924-1930 gold recoveries ranged from 72% to 89% using a similar process to that used in the years prior to 1924. Lindgren (1896) estimated that gold mills in the Grass Valley mines averaged 75% metallurgical gold recovery but noted that the I-M Mine was unique in that it treated the tailings from its concentrates by secondary processes. Rise has assumed a metallurgical recovery of 85% for the pre-1924 processing at the I-M Mine which it believes is the best estimate possible given the information available.

54

Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types

Geology

The I-M Mine Property is located in the Grass Valley area of the Western Sierra Nevada Foothills of Northern California. This belt of rocks consists of late Paleozoic marine sedimentary and ophiolitic rocks, and early and late Mesozoic submarine volcanic-arc and basinal terranes.

The Jura-Triassic arc belt has yielded the majority of gold production in the Western Sierra Nevada Foothills. Gold deposits in Jura-Triassic arc belt are associated with second, third, and fourth–order faults related to the regionally significant Wolf Creek/Bear Mountain and Melones faults.

The Grass Valley area is dominated by blocks of variably metamorphosed volcanic, mafic plutonic, and minor sedimentary rocks hosted in a serpentinite matrix. The whole package of rocks exhibits a region foliation and is interpreted as a serpentinite-matrix tectonic mélange. These rocks were variably metamorphosed from lower greenschist to amphibolite facies during and after accretion to the continental margin. Two distinct gold vein groups exist within the Grass Valley district: steeply dipping E-W-trending veins in the northern and generally N-S trending veins with gentler dips averaging 35° in the southern part of the district. The most important E-W veins are associated with the I-M Mine Property. Both vein sets have extraordinary vertical and lateral persistence; individual veins extend for kilometers.

Mineralization

All of the significant gold production from the I-M Mine was localized within and around the Brunswick Block, which consists of variably metamorphosed volcanic and intrusive, and minor sedimentary rocks. The Brunswick Block is surrounded to the west, north, and east by gabbro and serpentinite rocks. Overlying Tertiary volcanic rocks mask rock units along the southern boundary of the Brunswick Block. The contacts between the Brunswick Block and surrounding gabbro and serpentinite are dominated by the 6-3, the Idaho, and the Morehouse Fault domains. Mineralization is closely associated with these significant second or third order structures close to the contact between the Brunswick block and serpentinite contact. Gold in the quartz veins occurs as native gold, ranging from very fine grains to large nuggets within the quartz. Sulfide minerals, primarily pyrite with lesser galena, chalcopyrite, from 1% to 4% are commonly associated with gold mineralization. Scheelite is common in the Union Hill area near the Brunswick mine. Gangue minerals include quartz, carbonate, sericite, chlorite, mariposite, and albite. Ankerite is a common alteration mineral and may occur in the mafic and ultra-mafic rocks and the meta-volcanic rocks. The mineralized wallrock is strongly carbonate altered.

Gold mineralization on the I-M Mine Property can be divided into three significant vein systems: the Idaho, the Brunswick, and the Morehouse systems.

Idaho System

The #1 Vein, #2 Vein, and 3 Vein System comprise the Idaho Vein System.

The Eureka discovery showing outcropped at the western end of the #1 Vein system but had only minor gold concentration and could not be traced on surface east or west. High grade mineralization plunging to the south east was intersected starting at approximately 100 ft (30 m) below surface at this showing. Follow-up exploration and mining led to the development of the prolific Eureka-Idaho ore shoot which plunges at approximately 30° to the south east and has a pitch length of almost 1 mile (1.6 km) and a breadth of 500 ft to 1,000 ft (152 m to 305 m). The width of the vein within the ore shoot averaged approximately 3 ft (~1 m) and in places ranged up to 8 ft (~2.4 m). The average insitu grade of the #1 Vein would likely have been slightly higher than the estimated mill head grade of 1.12 oz/ton (39 gpt). The trend of the shoot is approximately parallel to an expected trend of the intersection of the Idaho and Morehouse faults suggesting the interaction of the Idaho and Morehouse faults may have played a role on the formation of the rich mineralization encountered in the Eureka-Idaho stope. Alternatively, the shape of the Brunswick Block may have influenced this trend.

55

The Idaho #1 Vein occurs coincident with a diabase dike hosted in serpentinite, in close proximity to the serpentinite-Brunswick Block contact. Just west of the Idaho shaft, at the western end of the Idaho #1 Vein, the diabase dike bends in an arc to the south mimicking a fold around the nose of the Brunswick Block. The Eureka-Idaho ore shoot pinches out at the I1500 Level but significant gold grades coincident with a diabase dike hosted in serpentinite in close proximity to the serpentinite-Brunswick contact were exposed in workings on the I2400 Level suggesting the vein may open up again or a second vein is present. To the east, the Eureka-Idaho ore shoot pinches out near the #2 Vein. All rocks are highly altered and contain much ankerite. The cross section in Figure 7 shows the general form and relationship of the #1 Vein with the serpentinite and diabase dike.

Figure 7:#l Vein Cross Section, Section looking East (Lindgren. 1896)

(GRAPHICS)

The #2 Vein is a disrupted zone of quartz veins trending northeast and dipping steeply to the south east. This vein system is hosted in the serpentinite approximately coincident with where the serpentinite-Brunswick Block contact bends abruptly to the north before turning east again. #2 Vein trends northeast into the 3 Vein System.

The 3 Vein System, like the #1 Vein system, hosts a prolific ore shoot. The 3 Vein System comprises an Idaho fault split into four main branches. Connecting diagonal structures between the four fault branches were also mineralized. As with the #1 Vein, gold mineralization is associated with a diabase dike sub parallel to the serpentine-Brunswick Block contact. The main 3 Vein was mined continuously over a vertical distance of approximately 1,500 ft (457 m) and an average horizontal strike length of approximately 700 ft (213 m). There were several important veins which splayed from the main 3 Vein, forming the larger 3 Vein System. The most important of which were named the 5 Vein, 13 Vein, and 22 Vein. Minor splays from the main 3 Vein included 19 Vein, 4 Vein, and 6 Vein. The 3 Vein ranged in dip from 45° to 70°, with an average dip of approximately 55°. An average vein width of approximately 5 ft (1.5 m) was typical but in places reached widths of over 20 ft (6 m).

In the 3 Vein System, the best mineralization was typically found in quartz veins where the Idaho structures intersected areas where diabase dikes or Brunswick Block rocks are in contact with the serpentinite unit. Veins hosted solely in serpentinite were rarely of economic importance due to the yielding nature of the serpentinite which typically does not allow wide or continuous open structures to form from faulting. The 23 Vein is an exception. Also known as the Rose Garden, it was intersected by exploration drifting 2,000 ft (610 m) east of the main 3 Vein System on I2000 Level. The mine operator was following the Idaho #5 Vein towards the 6-3 Fault and located the 23 Vein by diamond drilling. The 23 Vein dips to the northwest as opposed to the southwest and is hosted entirely in serpentinite. It is quite narrow but was noted to contain abundant visible gold. The 23 Vein was followed along strike to the south east directly to its intersection with the 6-3 Fault.

56

Brunswick System

The Brunswick vein system constitutes a distinct vein system within meta-volcanic rocks of the Brunswick Block. The veins strike northwesterly and have a southwesterly dip. These parallel, vertically dipping mineralized veins were mined above 1600L along continuous strike lengths ranging from 430 ft (131 m) to 1,000 ft (305 m) with continuous vertical heights reaching up to 1,000 ft (305 m). These veins generally range from several inches up to 8 ft (2.4 m) in width. A few veins with opposite strike and dip occur. The veins are most numerous and have the highest grades near the 6-3 Fault. The veins nearest to the fault turn to the north on the footwall side, suggesting a northward component of movement of the hanging wall. A quartz-carbonate stockwork develops near the fault. The quartz stringers dip from the veins toward the fault and many have connecting diagonals extending from an upper to a lower stringer toward the fault. The Brunswick veins generally pinch out before rarely coming in contact with the fault footwall. No significant mineralization is present in the fault. Only a few unimportant veins are known beyond its hanging wall.

In the area of the Brunswick veins there are layers of meta-sedimentary rocks within the meta-volcanic rocks that exhibit the regional N-W schistosity dipping very steeply to the north. Where the Brunswick veins cross these meta-sedimentary rocks vein splitting and en-echelon crossings occur forming what is known in the historical records as “Zebra Rock.” The “Zebra Rock” produced “fair” to “good” grades of large tonnage and the presence of free gold was reported. A large “Zebra Rock” zone was intersected and mined along the western extents of 16 Vein from levels 1300L to 1000L. Mining in this zone occurred over strike lengths from 360 ft to 525 ft (110 m to 160 m) and reached widths of up to 110 ft (34 m) on 1100 level.

Morehouse System

The Morehouse vein system is not as well understood as the Idaho #1, #2, 3 Vein System, and Brunswick vein systems. It is defined by fault and quartz-vein and quartz stockwork intersections in workings and drill holes in only a few areas such as the Morehouse, 16 Vein, 52 Vein, and 60 Winze. There is little historic production from the Morehouse Vein system.

The Morehouse vein is associated with the serpentinite-hosted diabase dike wrapping around the western end of the Brunswick Block. Underground working show the Morehouse connects directly to the Idaho #1 Vein. The extension of the Idaho shaft in 1923 to I1500 Level intersected the Morehouse splay and the shaft station on I1500 Level is right above the #1 Vein.

The best Morehouse mineralization intersected to date, and the only significant production, occurs within the Brunswick Block at the 52 Vein and 60 Winze areas. There is very little other exploration of this vein in the Brunswick Block.

Mineral Deposit Type

The Author describes the Idaho System deposits on the I-M Mine Property as an orogenic gold deposit. Orogenic gold deposits encompass a broad range of depth of formation and different host lithologies; however, common to orogenic gold deposits is a spatial association with compressional to transpressional deformation processes at convergent plate margins in accretionary and collisional orogens. Most ores are post-orogenic with respect to tectonism of their immediate host rocks but are simultaneously syn-orogenic with respect to ongoing deep-crustal, subduction-related thermal gradient. Depth of formation of orogenic deposits are best subdivided into epizonal (<6 km / <3.7 mi), mesozonal (6–12 km / 3.7-7.5 mi), and hypozonal (>12 km / >7.5 mi).

The gold deposits on the I-M Mine Property have been classified as Mesothermal Quartz Veins (Lindgren, 1894), are also known as and are type-examples of low-sulfide Au-quartz vein deposits (Berger, 1986), and gold quartz vein deposits (Ash, 2001). These classifications are sub-groups of orogenic gold deposit type.

57

Exploration

Rise has initiated but not yet completed the recommended exploration work program on the I-M Mine Property. Prior to initiating this work it had completed a comprehensive exploration desktop study which involved the compilation of the extensive historical dataset into digital format and which was then used to identify several promising exploration targets. Data compilation and processing completed by Rise is summarized as follows:

Scanned historical documents into a digital library

Reviewed available historical exploration and development data of the I-M Mine

Reviewed reports on the I-M Property and local geology, written by geologists and engineers employed at the Mine, hired as Consultants, or external professionals

Prepared a detailed 3D mine model of the mine workings (drifts, raises, and winzes) and stopes

Prepared a 3D geological model of vein locations, faults, rock types, and contact locations

Developed a historical diamond drill hole database

Tabulated historical production at the I-M Mine

Compilation of the historic data led to the identification of several significant unexplored exploration targets below the current workings within the I-M Mine Property which include:

#1 Vein Target

This is a possible down-plunge extension of the prolific Eureka-Idaho stope. The #1 Vein target covers an area 2,150 ft (655 m) between the I2400 Level west and east drifts and 500 ft to 1,000 ft (152 m to 305 m) down-dip from the I2400 level. Within this area gold mineralization may occur within a quartz vein adjacent to the diabase dike similar to that encountered in the prolific Eureka-Idaho stope above or may be hosted within the adjacent diabase dike. The projected down-dip extension of the #1 Vein target is defined in relation to the deepest mineralization encountered at the nearby Empire Mine. This does not preclude deeper mineralization.

Crackle Zone Target

This is a wedge-shaped area 2,000 ft (610 m) wide and 500 ft to 1,000 ft (152 m to 305 m) thick at the I2700 Level, plunging as much as 5,000 ft (1,524 m) to the south east where it pinches out against the intersection of the Idaho, Morehouse, and 6-3 Faults. Within this zone, gold mineralization may occur in shallow dipping quartz veins and irregular quartz stockworks in metavolcanic rocks that may be highly fractured due to the interaction of the Idaho, Morehouse, and 6-3 Faults.

Brunswick Target

The Brunswick area offers many areas with potential for discovery of mineralization, particularly the area below the existing stoping and in the untested area in the immediate footwall of the 6-3 Fault south east of the Brunswick shaft. In Brunswick Mine, the richest mineralization was typically found near the 6-3 Fault. Below 1600 Level, development in the southern region of the Brunswick Mine deviated to the west, away from the 6-3 Fault leaving a region of unexplored ground in the footwall adjacent to the fault approximately 500 ft to 1,000 ft (152 m to 305 m) thick, 1,000 ft to 2,000 ft (305 m to 610 m) wide, and 1,000 ft to 3,000 ft (305 m to 914 m) deep.

58

3 Vein – Rose Garden Target

Rose Garden-style mineralization is hosted solely in serpentinite with no apparent association with the brittle rocks common in all other mine and target areas of the Idaho-Maryland Project. Serpentinite within the Idaho fault zone, east towards the 6-3 Fault and west of the 3 Vein area may host mineralization similar to the Rose Garden.

All exploration targets are below current extents of drilling and development and warrant exploration through drilling. Through its life, the I-M Mine faced several shut downs related to fires and war measures that resulted in loss of access to some promising areas due to collapsed workings or early termination of planned developments. Exploration potential may remain in some of these areas.

Drilling

Rise has initiated but not yet completed an exploration drilling program on the I-M Mine Property.

Rise has prepared a drill hole database derived from information contained in the collection of historic documents and records acquired through the purchase of the I-M Mine Property. The drill hole database is divided into I-M Mine drilling completed before the mine shut down in 1956 and Emgold drilling completed in 2004.

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

Sample Preparation and Analysis

Sample preparation methods, quality control measures, security measures, assaying and analytical procedures, and quality control measures presented in the Report are applicable to historical operations. There is no detailed information describing sample preparation, analysis and security procedures applied by mine operators prior to 2002. The historical samples are reportedly fire-assayed at former mine site laboratories. No records exist of any QA/QC program.

Emgold sample preparation, analysis and security procedures for core collected by Emgold are described in a 2009 Technical Report prepared by Robert Pease, P.G., for Emgold titled “Idaho-Maryland Mine Project, Grass Valley CA”. Three-foot core samples were cut in half by a wet saw. The half core samples were put in a sample bag, tagged, and shipped to a laboratory. All samples were crushed to 80% passing -10 mesh, rotary split to a 500 g subsample which was pulverized to 95% passing -150 mesh. All samples were analyzed using screened metallics fire assay methods. The QAQC program used Standard Reference Materials, blank samples, coarse reject and pulp duplicate samples, and third party laboratory check assays. Insertion rate of SRMs and duplicates was approximately 1 in 20 samples. Blanks were only inserted immediately following mineralized intervals. The control samples were reportedly used to successfully control the assay quality process.

Subsequent to the date of the Report, Rise has established sample preparation methods, quality control measures, security measures, assaying and analytical procedures, and quality control measures to apply to its present assays. See “Business – Plan of Operations”.

Historical Data Verification

The Author inspected Rise’s 3D model on screen, reviewed several historical reports, and reviewed many historical documents including cross sections and level plans used to prepare the model. The drill hole database developed by Rise was not verified; however, drilling is not used extensively to support the reported exploration targets.

The Author did not assess previous I-M Mine operators or Emgold drilling sampling and assay quality. The Emgold drilling focused on shallow mineralization not considered part of the exploration targets described in the Report.

59

Although Rise has carefully digitized and checked the locations and values of drill hole results from level plans and other documents, the absence of drill hole related documentation, such as drill logs, drill hole deviation, core recovery and density measurements, assay certificates, and possible channel sample grade biases, could materially impact the accuracy and reliability of the reported results. The database that has been created, however, is suitable for exploration targeting.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

Rise has conducted limited mineral processing or metallurgical testing analyses on the I-M Mine Property.

A significant amount of historical production has occurred on the I-M Mine Property which confirms that gold can be recovered, mainly by gravity and flotation methods. Nearly all gold at the I-M Mine is free milling, as demonstrated by cyanide leaching of concentrates and tailings by the I-M Mine during past production.

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates

The present Report does not include an estimate of mineral resources for the I-M Mine Property. Rise is not treating the historical mineral resource estimate as a current mineral resource estimate. In addition, there are no mineral reserves estimates for the I-M Mine Project.

60

References

American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM). (2013). ASTM E1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. Retrieved at http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?E1527-13

Ash, Chris. (June 2001). Bulletin 108: Relationship Between Ophiolites and Gold-Quartz Veins in the North American Cordillera. Chapter 8. Geological Survey Branch. Victoria, BC. Retrieved at http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/Mining/Geoscience/PublicationsCatalogue/BulletinInformation/BulletinsAfter1940/Pages/Bulletin108.aspx

California Department of Conservation (CDC). (April 2017). SMARA Mines – AB 3098 List, Listing as of April 7, 2017). Retrieved at http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dmr/SMARA%20Mines/ab_3098_list/Pages/Index.aspx

Cal. Pub. Res. Code (CPRC). California Public Resources Code.Chapter 9 – Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975. 1975.

Cal. Pub. Res. Code (CPRC). California Public Resources Code.Division 13 – Environmental Quality. 1979.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (February 1992). City of Sacramento v. State Water Resources Control Board. Retrieved at http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/cases/1992/sac_swrcb.html

City of Grass Valley Community Development Dept. (CoGV-CDD). City of Grass Valley 2020 General Plan Map. Grass Valley, CA. November 2009.

Clark, Jack. Gold In Quartz – The Legendary Idaho Maryland Mine. Grass Valley, CA. 2005.

Engineering/Remediation Resources Group, Inc. (ERRG). Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Round-Hole and New Brunswick Mine Sites. Concord, CA. March 2007.

Geocon Consultants, Inc. (Geocon). Draft Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report. Rancho Cordova, CA. August 2016.

Geomatrix Consultants Inc. (Geomatrix). Summary – Phase II Investigation: Data Collection and Analysis, Brunswick Lumber Mill Site Nevada County, CA. September 2006.

Groves, D.I., Goldfarb, R.J., Gebre-Mariam, M., Hagemann, S.G., Robert, F. Orogenic gold deposits: A proposed classification in the context of their crustal distribution and relationship to other gold deposit types. Ore Geol. Rev. Special Issue, 13, 7-27. 1998.

Kleinschmidt. City of Grass Valley Sphere of Influence Plan. Prepared for Nevada Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). April 2011.

Lindgren, W. US Geological Survey Grass Valley Special Map. 1894.

Lindgren, Waldemar. The Gold Quartz Veins of Nevada City and Grass Valley Districts, California (1896).

Nevada County Code (NCC). (March 2017). Article 3 Specific Land Uses. Retrieved from http://qcode.us/codes/nevadacounty/?view=desktop&topic=3-ii-2-l__2

Pease, Robert C. Idaho-Maryland Mine Project, Grass Valley CA Technical Report. December 2009.

Shore, F.M for United States Bureau of Mines. Mineral Yearbook 1941. Pg. 252. Washington, D.C. 1943. Retrieved at http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/EcoNatRes.MinYB1941

61

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On September 17, 2014, we learned that our company, along with a number of additional defendants, were the subject of a notice of civil claim (the “Wundr Claim”) filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia by Wundr Software Inc. (“Wundr”), an eBook software developer. Wundr and our company were formerly parties to a binding letter of intent that was announced on November 12, 2013 (the “Wundr LOI”), pursuant to which we proposed to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of Wundr. On January 10, 2014, we reported that the Wundr LOI had expired.

Among other things, the Claim alleges that we committed the tort of intentional interference with economic or contractual relations by virtue of our role in an alleged scheme to establish a competing business to Wundr, and that we, through our agents, breached the terms of the Wundr LOI by appropriating certain confidential information and intellectual property of Wundr for the purpose of establishing a competing business. The Claim also alleges that we are vicariously liable for the actions of our agents.

Wundr is seeking general damages from our company as well as damages for conspiracy to cause economic harm. None of the allegations contained in the Claim have been proven in court, which we believe are without merit, and we therefore intend to vigorously defend our position against Wundr.

On May 5, 2017 we gave notice to Klondike that we were terminating the Klondike Agreement on the basis that certain of the Klondike Properties, contrary to representations made in the Klondike Agreement, could not be transferred to us free and clear of all encumbrances. On June 7, 2017, we filed a Civil Claim in B.C. Supreme Court claiming that the Klondike Agreement had been rescinded and seeking, among other things, the return of consideration paid to Klondike at the First Closing. On July 17, 2017, we entered into a material Settlement Agreement with Klondike and agreed to pay $100,000 and return any interests we had in the Klondike Properties in exchange for a full release from any future obligation and commitments to Klondike.

Other than as described above, we are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which the I-M Mine Property is the subject. We know of no proceedings to which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any rights convertibleregistered or exchangeable into sharesbeneficial holders of more than 5% of any class of our securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder are an adverse party or have a material interest adverse to our company.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Our common stock.stock is listed on the CSE under the symbol “RISE”, and the following table reflects the high and low sales price information for our Common Stock on that exchange since it began trading on February 1, 2016:

       
  CSE  
Quarter Ended High ($) Low ($)
April 30, 2018  0.15  0.085
January 31, 2018  0.21  0.115
October 31, 2017  0.195  0.09
July 31, 2017  0.315  0.135
April 30, 2017  0.36  0.20
January 31, 2017  0.40  0.17
October 31, 2016  0.29  0.15
July 31, 2016  0.23  0.11
April 30, 2016 (from Feb 1, 2016)  0.20  0.11

62

Our Common Stock was quoted under the symbol “RYES” on the OTC Pink Open Market (the “OTC Pink”) during our last two fiscal years and the subsequent interim period until November 27, 2017. Effective November 28, 2017 we commenced trading on the OTCQB under the symbol “RYES”.The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices as reported by OTC Markets Group for trading on the OTC Pink or OTCQB for the periods indicated. 

       
  OTC  
Quarter Ended High (US$) Low (US$)
April 30, 2018  0.1218  0.0699
January 31, 2018  0.165  0.0915
October 31, 2017  0.16  0.1051
July 31, 2017  0.25  0.1001
April 30, 2017  0.29  0.145
January 31, 2017  0.34  0.1087
October 31, 2016  0.40  0.12
July 31, 2016  0.16  0.11
April 30, 2016  1.15  0.08
January 31, 2016  0.25  0.08
October 31, 2015  0.21  0.20


Holders

Interests Of Named Experts And Counsel


As of the date of this prospectus, there are approximately 150 registered holders of our Common Stock and approximately 388 beneficial holders of our Common Stock who hold their investments through intermediaries.

No expert

Dividends

We have not paid dividends since our inception. While there are no restrictions in our Articles of Incorporation or counsel namedBylaws or pursuant to any agreement or understanding which could prevent us from paying dividends or distributions, we have limited cash flow and anticipate using all available cash resources to fund working capital and explore the I-M Mine Property. As such, there are no plans to pay dividends for the foreseeable future. Any decisions to pay dividends in cash or otherwise in the future will be made by the Board of Directors on the basis of our earnings, financial requirements and other conditions existing at the time a determination is made.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion provides information regarding the results of operations for the six month period ended January 31, 2018 and the years ended July 31, 2017 and 2016 and our financial condition, liquidity and capital resources as of January 31, 2018, July 31, 2017 and July 31, 2016. The financial statements and the notes thereto contain detailed information that should be referred to in conjunction with this discussion.

63

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with and our historical consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, as having preparedwell as the Risk Factors and theCautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statementsincluded above.

Results of Operations

Results of Operations for the Six Month Periods Ended January 31, 2018 and 2017

Our operating results for the six month periods ended January 31, 2018 and 2017 are summarized as follows:

  For the six month
period ended January
31, 2018
  For the six month
period ended January
31, 2017
 
Consulting $39,500  $195,171 
Directors fees  50,855   - 
Filing and regulatory  61,514   19,204 
Foreign exchange  (21,688)  1,407 
Gain on settlement of payables  (1,608)  (11,415)
General and administrative  105,436   60,006 
Geological, mineral and prospect costs  709,677   - 
Professional fees  224,057   93,752 
Promotion and shareholder communication  258,307   267,673 
Property investigation costs  -   55,253 
Salaries  91,077   64,225 
Share-based payments  -   570,255 
Loss for the period  (1,517,127)  (1,315,531)

Our operating expenses increased approximately 15% during the period ended January 31, 2018 compared to the period ended January 31, 2017 primarily as a result of the work program we initiated on the I-M Mineral Property, as well as increased costs for filing and regulatory expenses and professional fees. These increases in expenses were offset by a reduction in share-based payments and compensation. Increases in consulting and expenses related to planning and researching our mineral property interests and completing the recommended initial diamond drilling exploration program represented a new category of expenses totaling $709,677 over the period ended January 31, 2017. Legal costs increased the amount of professional fees for the period which related to various aspects of our operations, including the initial filing of a S-1 Registration Statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on September 5, 2017, contributed to the increase in professional costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

  At January
31, 2018
  At July
31, 2017
  Change between July 31,
2017 and January 31, 2018
 
Current Assets $192,288  $520,300  $(328,012)
Current Liabilities  193,417   334,871   141,454 
Working Capital/(Deficit)  (1,129)  185,429   (186,558)

Cash Flows

  For the six month
period ended
January 31, 2018
  For the six month
period ended
January 31, 2017
 
 Net Cash used in Operating Activities $(1,426,484) $(1,182,811)
Net Cash used in Investing Activities  (750,243)  (2,786,872)
Net Cash provided by Financing Activities  1,983,003   4,427,908 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash During Period  (193,724)  458,225 

64

As of January 31, 2018, we had cash reserves of $143,375, $192,288 in current assets, $4,732,385 in total assets, $193,417 in current and total liabilities, a working capital deficit of $1,129 and an accumulated deficit of $7,545,051.

During the six month period ended January 31, 2018, we used $1,426,484 (2017 - $1,182,811) in net cash on operating activities. The difference in net cash used in operating activities during the two periods was largely due to the increase in our net loss for the most recent year, as adjusted for an increase in prepaid expenses, and the accrual of a larger accounts payable, accrued liabilities and due to related parties balance based on our increased overall business activity.

During the six month period ended January 31, 2018, we used net cash of $750,243 (US$600,000) (2017 - $2,786,872 or certifiedUS$2,100,000) in investing activities for the option agreement with Sierra Pacific Industries Inc. to increase the holdings of the Idaho-Maryland property.

We received net cash of $1,983,003 (2017 - $4,427,908) from financing activities during the six month period ended January 31, 2018. In the current period, we received gross proceeds of $2,044,120 (2017 - $4,476,900) from private placements and proceeds of $19,267 (2017 - $27,208) from warrants exercised, offset by $80,384 (2017 - $119,950) in share issuance costs. In the prior period, we also received $43,750 from subscriptions received in advance for the issuance of securities.

We expect to continue operating at a loss for at least the next 12 months. We have no agreements for additional financing and cannot provide any assurance that additional funding will be available to finance our operations on acceptable terms in order to enable it to carry out our business plan. There are no assurances that we will be able to complete any further sales of our Common Stock or any other form of additional financing. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we will not be able to carry out any exploration work on the Idaho-Maryland Property or the other properties in which we own an interest and our business may fail.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended July 31, 2017 and 2016

Our operating results for the years ended July 31, 2017 and 2016 are summarized as follows:

  For the year ended
July 31, 2017
  For the year ended
July 31, 2016
 
Bad debt expenses $-  $7,126 
Consulting  505,842   102,420 
Directors fees  17,288   - 
Filing and regulatory  53,661   30,927 
Foreign exchange  6,931   1,959 
Gain on settlement of payables  (12,355)  (41,982)
General and administrative  152,920   20,839 
Mineral exploration  375,980   - 
Professional fees  273,738   107,197 
Promotion and shareholder communication  983,851   10,408 
Property investigation costs  55,253   20,201 
Salaries  104,751   5,365 
Share-based payments  1,010,064   369,006 
Settlement payment  100,000   - 
Write-off of mineral properties  563,031   - 
Net loss  4,190,955   633,466 

65

Our operating expenses increased during the year ended July 31, 2017 compared to the prior year primarily as a result of increased costs for consulting, filing and regulatory, professional fees and promotion and shareholder communications, driven by the need for increased activity and needed consultants and other expenses related to planning and researching our mineral properties, and promotional activity involved in raising funds in our recent private placements.

As a result of the increased activity, significant expenses during the year ended July 31, 2017 include:

promotion and shareholder communication of $983,851 (2016 - $10,408);

share-based payments of $1,010,064 (2016 - $369,006) for the grant of options pursuant to our stock option plan to incentivize management and certain consultants;

the write-off of mineral property acquisition costs of $563,031 (2016 - $nil) related to the termination of agreements for the Indata and Klondike properties, and an additional $100,000 (2016 - $nil) in a settlement payment to Klondike on termination;

professional fees of $273,738 (2016 - $107,197) related to various legal and regulatory items pertaining to operating in Canada and the United States; and

mineral exploration of $375,980 (2016 - $nil) related to preliminary exploration work on the Idaho-Maryland Mine Property during the year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the Years Ended July 31, 2017 and 2016

As of July 31, 2017, we had $337,099 in cash, $520,300 in current assets, $4,310,154 in total assets, $334,871 in current and total liabilities, working capital of $185,429 and an accumulated deficit of $6,027,924.

During the year ended July 31, 2017, we used $2,704,241 in net cash on operating activities, whereas we used $276,299 in net cash on operating activities during the prior year. The difference in net cash used in operating activities during the two years was largely due to the increase in our net loss for the most recent year, as adjusted for an increase in prepaid expenses.

During the year ended July 31, 2017, we used net cash of $3,605,854 (US$2,600,000) (2016 - $80,000) in investing activities for the acquisition of the I-M Mine Property, related transaction costs, and our recent option agreement to increase the holdings of the I-M Mine Property. In the prior period, we paid $30,000 and $50,000 pursuant to the Indata and Klondike option agreements, respectively.

We received net cash of $6,508,173 (2016 - $477,320) from financing activities during the year ended July 31, 2017. In the current period, we received gross proceeds of $6,662,907 (2016 - $605,000) from private placements, $27,208 (2016 - $1,925) from the exercise of warrants, and $60,000 (2016 - $Nil) from the exercise of options, offset by $241,942 (2016 - $83,105) in share issuance costs and repayments of related party loans of $Nil (2016 - $46,500).

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For the Six Month Period Ended January 31, 2018 and the Years Ended July 31, 2017 and 2016

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

66

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

As of May 18, 2018, the names, titles, and ages of the members of our Board of Directors and our executive officers are as set forth in the table below.

NameAgePositionDate of Appointment
Benjamin W. Mossman40Chief Executive Officer, President, DirectorAugust 1, 2016
Vince W. Boon37Chief Financial Officer TreasurerMay 1, 2018
May 16, 2018
John G. Proust59DirectorApril 18, 2018
John D Anderson(1)54DirectorAugust 30, 2016
Thomas I. Vehrs(1)71DirectorApril 20, 2017
Alan R. Edwards(1)60Chairman, DirectorApril 20, 2017

(1)Member of the audit committee.

The following sets forth a brief description of the business experience of each of our directors and executive officers:

Benjamin W. Mossman; Chief Executive Officer, President, Director

Benjamin W. Mossman, P.Eng was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer and a director on August 1, 2016 and our President on April 20, 2017. Mr. Mossman is a mining engineer with over 15 years of experience in the mining industry including experience in capital markets, project evaluation, acquisitions, and mine operations and development. He was formerly the President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Banks Island Gold Ltd., a dormant mining company, formerly listed on the TSX Venture Exchange and currently in receivership. See “Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings” below.

Vince Boon; Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

Vince Boon was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer on May 1, 2018 and Treasurer on May 16, 2018. Mr. Boon is a chartered accountant with over ten years of professional accounting experience with private and public companies focusing on financial reporting, regulatory compliance, internal control and corporate finance activities. Mr. Boon’s experience includes financial reporting for both Canadian and U.S. listed companies with international subsidiaries, strategic planning, tax planning, corporate governance, equity financings and due diligence for acquisitions. Mr. Boon is currently the CFO/Corporate Secretary of Japan Gold Corp., and the CFO of Southern Arc Minerals Inc., Canada Energy Partners Inc., TekModo Industries Inc. and Tethyan Resources plc. Mr. Boon holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of British Columbia and is a Chartered Professional Accountant, CPA, CA.

John G. Proust; Director

John G. Proust was appointed to our Board of Directors on April 18, 2018. Mr. Proust has founded and managed a number of resource companies over the past 30 years. Mr. Proust has served on several boards and held senior operating positions, and has directed and advised public and private companies regarding debt and equity financing, mergers and acquisitions and corporate restructuring since 1986. Mr. Proust is currently Chairman and CEO of Southern Arc Minerals Inc., Chairman and CEO of Japan Gold Corp., Chairman and a director of Canada Energy Partners Inc., non-executive Chairman and director of Tethyan Resources plc, executive director of TekModo Industries Inc., a director of Pinedale Energy Limited and a director of Q Investments Ltd. Mr. Proust

67

has extensive experience in corporate governance, is a graduate of The Directors College, Michael G. De Groote School of Business at McMaster University and holds the designation of Chartered Director. 

John D. Anderson; Director

John D. Anderson was appointed to our Board of Directors on August 31, 2016. He was the co-founder of Aquastone Capital Advisors LP, a U.S.-based gold investment fund. With over 20 years of experience in the capital markets, Mr. Anderson’s specialty is identifying undervalued opportunities in the resource industry and investing capital into these situations. He has been involved in a number of small-cap companies, providing financing, investor relations and corporate development services. Throughout his career, Mr. Anderson has raised in excess of US$500-million in equity for a number of public and private companies in the United States, Canada and Europe. Mr. Anderson holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Western Ontario.

Thomas I. Vehrs; Director

Thomas I. Vehrs was appointed to our Board of Directors on April 20, 2017. Dr. Vehrs is a highly regarded and experienced exploration geologist with over 40 years of experience in the Americas. During his career, Dr. Vehrs has conducted and managed numerous exploration programs resulting in the discovery and delineation of major copper, gold and silver deposits, including the Los Pelambres porphyry copper deposit in Chile, the Northumberland sediment-hosted gold deposit in central Nevada, the Rio Blanco porphyry copper deposit in northern Peru and orogenic gold deposits in Central Guatemala. For the past ten years, Dr. Vehrs held the position of Vice President of Exploration for Fortuna Silver Mines and was responsible for the development and execution of exploration programs at the Caylloma Mine in Peru and the San Jose Mine in southern Mexico. During this period, Fortuna Silver Mines was successful in expanding the resources, reserves and production rate at the San Jose Mine resulting in a market capitalization in excess of $1 billion. Dr. Vehrs holds a Ph.D. in geology from Syracuse University and served as an officer in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Alan R. Edwards; Chairman, Director

Alan R. Edwards was appointed to our Board of Directors on April 20, 2017 and serves as Chairman. Mr. Edwards is an experienced executive and engineer with over 35 years of experience in the mining industry. Mr. Edwards was the General Manager for three major mining operations in the United States and the Senior Vice President of Operations for Freeport Indonesia where he was responsible for the leadership of a workforce of over 6,000 employees. Mr. Edwards served as the Vice President Operations for Kinross Gold Corporation and as the Chief Operating Officer for Apex Silver Mines where he directed the successful construction of the $675 million San Cristobal Mine in the difficult political climate of Bolivia. Mr. Edwards has served on numerous boards of public companies including as Chairman of AuRico Gold Corporation during a period of extensive growth which culminated into a successful US$1.5 billion merger with Alamos Gold. Mr. Edwards holds an MBA and a Mining Engineering degree from the University of Arizona.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Except as disclosed below, during the past ten years none of the persons serving as our executive officers and/or directors have been the subject of any of the following legal proceedings that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K, including: (a) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (b) any criminal convictions (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (c) any order, judgment, or decree permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; (d) any finding by a court, the SEC or the CFTC to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud; or (e) any sanction or order of any

68

self-regulatory organization or registered entity or equivalent exchange, association, entity or other organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member. Further, no such legal proceedings are believed to be contemplated by governmental authorities against any director or executive officer.

Benjamin W. Mossman was a director and officer of Banks Island Gold Ltd. (“Banks”) during the time it assigned itself into bankruptcy on January 7, 2016. Banks appointed D. Manning & Associates as trustee (the “Trustee”) in the bankruptcy proceedings. Subsequent to the bankruptcy, a Receiver, FTI Consulting, was appointed as receiver by a major secured creditor. On April 4, 2018, the Trustee was discharged. To the best of Mr. Mossman’s knowledge, the secured creditor has not taken possession of the property as of this date. To date, Banks remains undischarged from the bankruptcy proceeding.

Benjamin W. Mossman along with 2 other former employees of Banks and Banks itself are subject to summary conviction proceedings commenced in August 2016 for alleged violations of the British Columbia provincial Environmental Management Act, the Provincial Water Act, and the federal Fisheries Act. Banks was a company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange at the time of the alleged infractions and traded under the symbol “BOZ”. The charges are related to the active mining operations conducted by Banks at and on Banks Island, BC during the period from 2014 to 2016. Benjamin W. Mossman has entered a not-guilty plea to all counts and intends to defend himself vigorously against all charges.

Alan Edwards, a Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Oracle Mining Corp. (“Oracle”) until his resignation effective February 15, 2015. On December 23, 2015, Oracle announced that the Superior Court of Arizona had granted the application of Oracle’s lender to appoint a receiver and manager over the assets, undertaking and property of Oracle Ridge Mining LLC.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information with respect to the compensation awarded or paid to Benjamin W. Mossman, our Chief Executive Officer, President and director, Cale Thomas, our former Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and director and Fred Tejada, our former Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and director (the “named executive officers”), for all services rendered in all capacities to our company during the previous two fiscal years. As of July 31, 2017, we did not have any other executive officers and no other individual who received total compensation in excess of US$100,000 during those periods. Pursuant to Item 402(a)(5) of Regulation S-K, we have omitted certain columns from the table since there was no compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to these individuals required to be reported in such columns in either year.

Name and Principal
Position
 Year
Ended
July 31
 Salary
($)
 Share-based
Awards ($)
 Option Awards
($)(1)
 Total
($)
 
               
Benjamin W. Mossman, 2017  135,000(3)  60,000(4)  570,255(5)  765,255 
Chief Executive Officer(2)                  
  2016  5,000(3)  Nil   Nil   5,000 
                   
Cale Thomas, our former 2017  63,904(3) (7)  Nil   Nil   63,904 
Chief Financial Officer,                  
Treasurer and Secretary(6) 2016  22,946(3) (8)  Nil   95,668(9)  118,614 
                   
Fred Tejada, our former 2017  32,119(11)  Nil   Nil   32,119 
Chief Executive Officer(10)                  
  2016  30,000(11)  Nil   123,002(12)  153,002 

(1)See Note 8 of the notes to our audited financial statements included in this Report for a description of the assumptions made in the valuation of option awards.

69

(2)Mr. Mossman was appointed our Chief Executive Officer on August 1, 2016.
(3)Represents payments made pursuant to an executive employment agreement.
(4)Represents 400,000 shares of common stock issued to Mr. Mossman at a deemed price of $0.15 per share in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer,
(5)Represents share-based payments related to options vesting during the year ended July 31, 2017. Options for the purchase of 586,600 shares of Common Stock were granted on August 9, 2016, exercisable at $0.20 per share until August 8, 2021, and options for the purchase of 2,142,542 shares of Common Stock were granted on December 27, 2016, exercisable at $0.24 per share until December 27, 2021.
(6)Cale Thomas resigned as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary on May 1, 2018
(7)Represents $52,429 paid to Mr. Thomas personally and $11,476 representing Mr. Thomas’ share of consulting payments made to Scharfe Investment Group of Companies Inc., a company in which Mr. Thomas holds a 50% interest.
(8)Represents $18,000 paid to Mr. Thomas personally and $4,946 representing Mr. Thomas’ share of consulting payments made to Scharfe Investment Group of Companies Inc., a company in which Mr. Thomas holds a 50% interest.
(9)Represents share-based payments related to options vesting during the year ended July 31, 2016. Options for the purchase of 700,000 shares of Common Stock were granted on March 22, 2016, exercisable at $0.15 per share until March 22, 2021.
(10)Fred Tejada resigned as our Chief Executive Officer on August 1, 2016. Mr. Tejada resigned as our President, Secretary and a director on April 20, 2017.
(11)Represents consulting fees paid.
(12)Represents share-based payments related to options vesting during the year ended July 31, 2016. Options for the purchase of 900,000 shares of Common Stock were granted on March 22, 2016, exercisable at $0.15 per share until March 22, 2021.

Executive Compensation

During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2017, we paid salaries of $135,000 (2016 - $5,000) to our Chief Executive Officer, Benjamin W. Mossman; consulting fees of $63,904 (2016 - $22,946) to our former Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, Cale Thomas; and consulting fees of $32,119 (2016 - $30,000) to our former President and former Chief Executive Officer, Fred Tejada.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information relating to the options granted to the named executive officers that were outstanding as of July 31, 2017:

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
 
Name Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options Exercisable
 Option Exercise Price 
($)
 Option Expiration Date
Benjamin W. Mossman(1)  586,600
2,142,542
  0.20
0.24
 August 8, 2021
December 27, 2021
Cale Thomas  700,000  0.15 March 22, 2021
Fred Tejada(2)  400,000 (2) 0.15 March 22, 2021

(1)On April 18, 2018, an additional 2,631,000 stock options with an exercise price of $0.12 per share and an expiry date of April 18, 2023 were granted to Benjamin W. Mossman pursuant to an employment agreement dated April 19, 2017 as amended on April 16, 2018. These options vested upon grant.
(2)On April 20, 2017 Mr. Tejada surrendered 500,000 of the 900,000 stock options we had previously granted to him. He remains a part of our team as a consultant and retains 400,000 options in such capacity.

Employment Agreements

On July 7, 2016, we entered into an executive employment agreement with Benjamin W. Mossman, our Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which we engaged Mr. Mossman’s services on an ongoing basis beginning on August 1, 2016. Pursuant to the agreement, we issued 400,000 shares of Common Stock to Mr. Mossman as a

70

signing bonus on August 1, 2016, granted options to purchase 586,600 shares of Common Stock to Mr. Mossman at a price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years on the same date, and were required to pay Mr. Mossman an annual salary of $120,000. On April 19, 2017, we entered into a new executive employment agreement with Mr. Mossman, which was amended on April 16, 2018 (the “Executive Employment Agreement”) to replace the original agreement. The Executive Employment Agreement, which commenced on May 1, 2017, provides for an annual salary of $180,000 per year and that Mr. Mossman will, subject to the terms of the stock option plan and exchange policies, be granted options from time to time to maintain his right to purchase 5% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock. To date, Mr. Mossman has been granted options to acquire 5,360,142 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms of his Executive Employment Agreement.

The Executive Employment Agreement includes compensation provisions for Mr. Mossman if there is a change of control, he is terminated without just cause, he resigns under circumstances contemplated in the Employment Agreement or he dies while in our employment. If there is a change of control and Mr. Mossman is terminated within one (1) year of the date of a change of control or if Mr. Mossman terminates his employment with us upon the occurrence of certain events, including a material adverse and fundamental change in his overall authority and responsibilities, Mr. Mossman will be entitled to a lump sum amount equal to three (3) years of Mr. Mossman’s then applicable annual salary. If Mr. Mossman is otherwise terminated without just cause, Mr. Mossman will be entitled to an amount equal to three (3) months of Mr. Mossman’s then applicable annual salary and will also be entitled to maintain in effect, until the earliest of the expiration of 18 months and the death of Mr. Mossman, participation in certain of our benefit plans and stock option plans. If Mr. Mossman dies while employed with us, Mr. Mossman’s estate, subject to compliance with stock exchange requirements, our stock option plan, and the terms of the Executive Employment Agreement, will be entitled to continue Mr. Mossman’s participation in our stock option plan.

We entered into an executive employment agreement dated October 1, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”) with Cale Thomas, who until May 1, 2018 was our Chief Financial Officer and a strategic advisor.  The Employment Agreement was for a term ending on March 22, 2021.  As part of his compensation we granted 700,000 stock options to Mr. Thomas exercisable at $0.15 per share of Common Stock until March 22, 2021.  The Employment Agreement provided that we would pay Mr. Thomas a monthly fee to be determined by our Board of Directors, which last determined to be $4,000 per month.  Upon his resignation the parties agreed to terminate the Employment Agreement. 

We have subsequently entered into a consulting services agreement (the “ThomasAgreement”) with Mr. Thomas pursuant to which he has agreed to assist with the transitioning of responsibility for business advisory, finance, accounting, corporate administrative matters to J. Proust & Associates, who now provides those services to our company, including liaising with our new Chief Financial Officer and corporate secretary.  The Consulting Agreement is for a three year term that commenced on May 1, 2018, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms.  Under the Thomas Agreement, Mr. Thomas will be paid $5,000 for the first six months of the agreement.  After the initial six months, Mr. Thomas will invoice us for any work he performs at our request.  In addition, by virtue of his retention as a consultant to the Company under the Thomas Agreement, Mr. Thomas was permitted pursuant to the Thomas Agreement to retain his 700,000 stock options previously granted to him under our Stock Option Plan.

When Fred Tejada resigned as our President, Secretary and a director, we entered into a consulting services agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with him pursuant to which Mr. Tejada continues to perform geological consulting services for our company. The Consulting Agreement is for a term that commenced on April 20, 2017 and ends on December 31, 2020, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms. Under the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Tejada will invoice us for any work he performs at our request. In addition, by virtue of his retention as a consultant to the Company under the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Tejada was permitted pursuant to the Consulting Agreement to retain 400,000 stock options previously granted to him under our Stock Option Plan when he was serving as a director and officer.

On April 17, 2018, we entered into a consulting services agreement (the “JPA Agreement”) with J. Proust & Associates Inc. (“JPA”). John G. Proust, a director and shareholder of JPA, is one of our directors and is also a director of Southern Arc Minerals Inc., one of our major shareholders. The JPA Agreement provides that JPA will provide business advisory, finance, accounting, corporate administrative services to our company to maintain

71

continuous disclosure obligations and comply with public listing requirements on the CSE in Canada as well as use of an office for a fee of $7,100 per month. Pursuant to the terms of the JPA Agreement JPA has provided the services of Vince Boon to serve as our CFO and treasurer, Eileen Au to serve as our corporate secretary and Dela Salem to serve as our controller. We have granted 1,200,000 stock options to Mr. Proust, 300,000 stock options to Mr. Boon, 300,000 stock options to Ms. Au and 200,000 stock options to Ms. Salem under our Stock Option Plan. The options are exercisable at a price of $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023. The term of the JPA Agreement expires April 17, 2019.

Other than Mr. Mossman, who devotes all of his working time to our business, we expect that our executive officers will allocate approximately 40% of their working time to our business.

Benefit Plans

We do not currently have any pension plan, profit sharing plan or similar plan for the benefit of our officers, directors or employees; however, we may establish such plans in the future.

Director Compensation

Our directors are compensated for serving on the Board of Directors. Management directors were not paid fees for services as a director; however they may have received compensation for their services as employees or consultants. The following table sets out compensation of the directors for the year ended July 31, 2017.

Name Fees Earned or Paid in
Cash ($)
 Option Awards ($)(1) Total 
($)
 
John D. Anderson  Nil   125,861(2)  125,861 
Thomas I. Vehrs(3)  6,915(4)  84,115(2)  91,030 
Alan R. Edwards(3)  10,373(5)  105,142(2)  115,515 
Bradley Scharfe(6)
Former Director
  160,809(7)  Nil   160,809 

(1)See Note 8 of the notes to our audited financial statements included in this Prospectus for a description of the assumptions made in the valuation of option awards.
(2)Represents share-based payments related to options vesting during the year ended July 31, 2017.
(3)Dr. Vehrs and Mr. Edwards were appointed directors on April 20, 2017.
(4)Represents directors’ fees. Dr. Vehrs is paid director’s fees of US$20,000 per year.
(5)Represents directors’ fees. Mr. Edwards serves as out Chairman and is paid director’s fees of US$30,000 per year.
(6)Bradley Scharfe resigned as a director on April 20, 2017.
(7)Consulting fees of $149,333 paid to Scharfe Holdings Inc., a company wholly owned by Mr. Scharfe, and $11,476 representing Mr. Scharfe’ share of consulting fees made to Scharfe Investment Group of Companies Inc., a company in which Mr. Scharfe holds a 50% interest.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

As of May 18, 2018 we had 116,105,982 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of May 18, 2018 by (a) each person who serves as a director and/or is a “named executive officer” of Rise in the Executive Compensation section above, and by all of our current directors and executive officers as a group, and (b) each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5.0% of any class of our voting securities.

A person is considered to beneficially own any shares over which such person, directly or indirectly, exercises sole or shared voting or investment power, or over which such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days through an exercise of stock options or warrants or otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated,

72

voting and investment power relating to the shares shown in the table for our officers and directors is exercised solely by the beneficial owner thereof.

For the purposes of this prospectustable, a person or havinggroup of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of our Common Stock that such person or group of persons has the right to acquire within 60 days. For the purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding Common Stock held by each person or group of persons named below, any shares that such person or group of persons has the right to acquire within 60 days ofMay 18, 2018 is deemed to be outstanding, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The inclusion herein of any shares listed as beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership.

Name and Address of 
Beneficial Owner

Amount and  
Nature of 
Beneficial 
Ownership

Percent of
Class(1)

Named Executive Officers and Directors
Benjamin W. Mossman
Suite 650 - 669 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC Canada V6C 0B4
 6,074,142 (2)5.0%
Alan R. Edwards
8121 N. Fairway View Dr.
Tucson, Arizona 85742
 800,000 (3)*
John G. Proust
Suite 650 - 669 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC Canada V6C 0B4
 1,200,000 (4)1.0%
John D. Anderson
Suite 650 - 669 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC Canada V6C 0B4
 750,000 (5)*
Thomas I. Vehrs
853 Windflower Drive
Longmont, Colorado 80504
 650,000 (6)*
Cale Thomas(7)
488 – 1090 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6E 3V7
 1,664,597 (8)1.4%
Fred Tejada
488 – 1090 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6E 3V7
1,103,505 (9)*
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (6 persons)9,774,142 (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(10)7.8%

73

Name and Address of 
Beneficial Owner

Amount and  
Nature of 
Beneficial 
Ownership

Percent of
Class(1)

5% Owners
Monarch Properties Ltd.
211 – 1328 Marinaside Crescent
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6Z 3B3
 7,879,832 (11)6.6%
Bradley Scharfe
488 – 1090 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6E 3V7
 10,745,206 (12)9.0%
Southern Arc Minerals Inc.
Suite 650, 669 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 0B4
 40,000,000 (13)29.4%

(1)Based on 116,105,982 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of May 18, 2018.
(2)Benjamin W. Mossman, our Chief Executive Officer, President and a director, holds 714,000 shares of Common Stock and 5,360,142 stock options, 586,600 of which are exercisable into Common Stock at a price of $0.20 per share until August 8, 2021, 2,142,542 of which are exercisable into Common Stock at a price of $0.24 per share until December 27, 2021 and 2,631,000 options exercisable at $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023.
(3)Alan R. Edwards, a director, holds 500,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Shares at a price of $0.28 per share until April 20, 2020 and 300,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Shares at a price of $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023.
(4)John G. Proust, a director, holds 1,200,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Shares at a price of $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023.
(5)John D. Anderson, a director, holds 500,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Shares at a price of $0.27 per share until April 3, 2022 and 250,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Shares at a price of $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023.
(6)Thomas I. Vehrs, a director, holds 400,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Shares at a price of $0.28 per share until April 20, 2020 and 250,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Shares at a price of $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023.
(7)Cale Thomas resigned as a director on April 18, 2018 and resigned as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary on May 1, 2018.
(8)Cale Thomas holds 895,031 shares of Common Stock, 700,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share until March 22, 2021, and warrants to purchase 52,174 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share until May 5, 2019, and also owns 8,696 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 8,696 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share until May 5, 2019 through his 50% owned company, Scharfe Investment Group of Companies Inc.
(9)Fred Tejada, our former Chief Executive Officer,holds 573,505 shares of Common Stock, warrants to purchase 130,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share until January 24, 2019 and 400,000 stock options which are exercisable into Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share until March 22, 2021.
(10)Includes 300,000 stock options, each of which is exercisable into Common Shares at a price of $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023 held by Vince Boon, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
(11)Includes 5,213,166 shares of Common Stock,warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share until December 23, 2018, warrants to purchase 666,666 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 per share until September 25, 2019 and warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share until April 18, 2021.

74

(12)5,963,379 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 874,435 shares of Common Stock are held by Scharfe Holdings Inc., a corporation over which Mr. Scharfe has sole voting and investment power and 8,696 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 8,696 shares of Common Stock represent Mr. Scharfe’s share of securities held by Scharfe Investment Group of Companies Inc., a company 50% owned by Mr. Scharfe. Mr. Scharfe also holds 30,500 shares of Common Stock personally. Mr. Scharfe previously served as a director of Rise. He resigned as a director on April 20, 2017.
(13)Southern Arc Minerals Inc. holds 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share until April 18, 2021. John G. Proust, one of our directors, is also a director of Southern Arc Minerals Inc.

*Less than 1%.

Changes in Control

We are not aware of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of its securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our company.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Promoters

During the past five fiscal years, the following persons have been or are considered to be promoters of our company: Benjamin W. Mossman, Cale Thomas, Bradley Scharfe and Fred Tejada. The amounts of anything of value (including money, property, contracts, options or rights of any kind) received or to be received by each promoter from our company, directly or indirectly, and the nature and amount of any services, assets or other consideration received or to be received by our company for the value given by each promoter during such period up to and until January 31, 2018 are set out below.

Benjamin Mossman

Mr. Mossman began working with us on July 15, 2016 and was appointed as a director and our Chief Executive Officer on August 1, 2016. He has been instrumental in sourcing the I-M Mine Property and in the negotiations for its purchase along with negotiations to purchase further contiguous land for the I-M Mine Project. Mr. Mossman secured the historical records of the I-M Mine along with other publically available information used to compile the Technical Report described in the Prospectus.

Pursuant to his Executive Employment Agreement, Mr. Mossman received $275,000 to date, was issued 400,000 shares of Common Stock in 2016 as a signing bonus, and has been granted stock options to purchase a total of 5,360,142 shares of Common Stock pursuant to our stock option plan. 586,600 options are exercisable at $0.20 per share until August 8, 2021, 2,142,542 options are exercisable at $0.24 per share until December 27, 2021 and 2,631,000 are options exercisable at $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023. Pursuant to his Executive Employment Agreement, Mr. Mossman is paid an opinion uponannual salary of $180,000. See “Employment Agreements” under the heading “Executive Compensation”.

Cale Thomas

Mr. Thomas was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a director on April 2, 2015, and as our Corporate Secretary on April 20, 2017. He ceased to be a director on April 18, 2018 and ceased to be the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary on May 1, 2018. He helped us bring our company from “shell” status to an operating entity in good standing, and trading on the US OTC Markets, and the Canadian Securities Exchange. He has led our management team in negotiating the payment of debts and the acquisition of mineral exploration projects suitable for investment and exploration.

Mr. Thomas, until his resignation on May 1, 2018, received a total of $136,779 in cash, which included $30,351 as Mr. Thomas’ share of fees paid to a company of which Mr. Thomas holds 50% ownership. He has also received options for the purchase up to 700,000 shares of our Common Stock pursuant to our stock option plan at a price of

75

$0.15 per share until March 22, 2021. In addition, we issued Mr. Thomas 2,000,000 shares at a price of $0.02 per share on April 9, 2015 pursuant to the conversion of $40,000 in debt. On October 28, 2015, Mr. Thomas agreed to cancel 857,143 of those shares in order to increase the effective conversion price to $0.035 per share. See “Employment Agreements” under the heading “Executive Compensation”.

When Mr. Thomas resigned as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and as a director, we entered into a consulting agreement with him to provide certain advisory services to our company. See “Employment Agreements” under the heading “Executive Compensation”.

Bradley Scharfe

Mr. Scharfe became a member of our board of directors on April 2, 2015 and ceased to be a director on April 20, 2017. He helped bring our company from shell status to an operating entity in good standing, and trading on the US OTC Markets, and on the CSE through negotiating the payment of debts and the acquisition of mineral exploration projects suitable for investment and exploration. Mr. Scharfe was also instrumental in attracting capital to finance our operations and allow us to make property acquisitions.

Mr. Scharfe received a total of $165,755, which includes $16,422 as Mr. Scharfe’s share of consulting fees paid to a company of which Mr. Scharfe holds 50% ownership, and $149,333 paid to Scharfe Holdings Inc., a company controlled by Mr. Scharfe. In addition, we issued Scharfe Holdings Inc. 13,548,241 shares at a price of $0.02 per share in exchange for the conversion of $270,964.83 in debt. On October 28, 2015, Scharfe Holdings Inc. agreed to cancel 5,806,389 of those shares in order to increase the effective conversion price to $0.035 per share.

Fred Tejada

Mr. Tejada became a member of our board of directors on June 1, 2012, our President and our Corporate Secretary on November 19, 2013 and our Chief Executive Officer on April 2, 2015. He resigned as our Chief Executive Officer on August 1, 2016 and as our President, Secretary and as one of our directors on April 20, 2017.

Mr. Tejada helped our company through its exploration stages by negotiating the purchase of various mineral exploration rights including the purchase of our British Columbia properties that were initially the focus of our exploration activities. Mr. Tejada has also provided and continues to provide, when requested, geological consulting and assistance with due diligence, on any mining opportunities that we review.

Mr. Tejada received $62,119 in cash and, pursuant to our stock option plan, options for the purchase of 900,000 shares of our Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share until March 22, 2021. Mr. Tejada agreed to surrender 500,000 of these options when he resigned his executive positions, so he currently retains 400,000 options. In addition, we issued Mr. Tejada 451,759 shares at a price of $0.02 per share pursuant to the conversion of $9,035.17 in debt; and on April 9, 2015, we issued an additional 250,000 shares to him at a price of $0.02 per share pursuant to the conversion of $5,000 in debt. On October 28, 2015, Mr. Tejada agreed to cancel an aggregate of 300,754 of those shares in order to increase the effective conversion price to $0.035 per share.

When Fred Tejada resigned as our President, Secretary and a director, we entered into a consulting services agreement with him pursuant to which Mr. Tejada continues to perform geological consulting services for our company. See “Employment Agreements” under the heading “Executive Compensation”.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the securities being registered orissuance of the Shares offered hereby will be passed upon other legal mattersfor us by SecuritiesLawUSA, PC, Los Angeles, California.

76

INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

The financial statements as of July 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended July 31, 2017 and 2016 included in connection withthis prospectus and in the registration or offeringstatement have been so included in reliance on the report of Davidson & Company LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

Certain portions of the common stock was employeddescription of the I-M Mine Property were summarized or extracted from a technical report prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 dated June 1, 2017 and entitled “Technical Report on a contingency basis, or had,the Idaho-Maryland Project, Grass Valley, California, USA”. Those extracts were reviewed and approved by Greg Kulla, P.Geo., the Author of the report.

None of the above experts has received, or is to receive, in connection with the offering, a substantial interest, direct or indirect, in the registrant.  Nor wasour company or any such personof our subsidiaries nor were they connected with the registrantour company or any of our subsidiaries as a promoter, managing or principal underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, or employee.


The financial statements included in this prospectus and the registration statementWHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have been audited by K.R. Margetson Ltd., Chartered Accountant, to the extent and for the periods set forth in their report appearing elsewhere in this document and in the registration statement filed with the SEC and are included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.


Description Of Business


We have commenced operations as an exploration stage company. We are engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties with a view to exploiting any mineral deposits we discover.  We own a 100% interest in one mineral claim known as the Vic Vein Mining claim is located approximately 250 km west of Williams Lake, British Columbia, Canada.  We purchased this claim from 1698727 Ontario Inc.


There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on the Vic Vein claim.  We do not have any current plans to acquire interests in additional mineral properties, though we may consider such acquisitions in the future.  


Mineral property exploration is typically conducted in phases.  Each subsequent phase of exploration work is recommended by a geologist based on the results from the most recent phase of exploration.  We have not yet commenced the initial phase of exploration on the Vic Vein Mining claim.  Once we have completed each phase of exploration, we will make a decision as to whether or not we proceed with each successive phase based upon the analysis of the results of that program.  Our director will make this decision based upon the recommendations of the independent geologist who oversees the program and records the results.


Our plan of operation is to conduct exploration work on the Vic Vein claim in order to ascertain whether it possesses economic quantities of gold.  There can be no assurance that an economic mineral deposit exists on the Vic Vein Mining claim until appropriate exploration work is completed.


Even if we complete our proposed exploration programs on the Vic Vein claim and we are successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will have to spend substantial funds on further drilling and engineering studies before we will know if we have a commercially viable mineral deposit.


Vic Vein Mining claim Purchase


On April 18, 2007, we entered into a Mineral Property Staking and Purchase Agreement with 1698727 Ontario Inc. whereby we purchased a 100% interest in the Vic Vein mining claim for $7,500.


Description, Location and Access


The Vic Vein Mining claim is located in the approximately 250 kilometers west of Williams Lake, British Columbia, just 8 kilometers northwest of the north end of Tatlayoko Lake. The property is accessible by a four wheel drive



14



road from the Mt. Skinner access road.   


Climate and Topography


The climate is dry and cool in the winter, while summers are generally warm and dry.  The topography of the claim is typical of the west Chilcotin area consisting of broad valleys and uplands.  Local elevation on the property ranges from 850 to1850 meters. The vegetation in general consists of jack pine and spruce trees with occasional open meadows and swamps.


 Title to the Vic Vein Mining claim


The Vic Vein Mining claim consists of one mineral claim.  A “mineral claim” refers to a specific section of land over which a title holder owns rights to explore the ground and subsurface, and extract minerals.  .  


Claim details are as follows:


Claim Name

Record Number

Expiry Date

Victoria Mining Claim

647243

October 6, 2010


Property Geology and Mineralization


Most of the claim property is underlain by a quartz diorite intrusion. Numerous mafic, intermediate and felsic dykes, up to three meters thick, intrude the quartz diorite. Sporadic chlorite-epidote alteration is present in the intrusion.


The Victoria vein is a mesothermal quartz vein within the quartz diorite intrusion. The length of the vein is undetermined but is at least 125 meters long, of which 110 meters has been exposed by hand trenching.


The vein pinches and swells and appears to be fault controlled. The vein is up to 1.4 meters in thickness, and strikes between 050 and 070 degrees, dipping at least 70 degrees northwest. The host quartz diorite is moderately silicified and chloritized adjacent to the vein and some argillic alteration is present.


The Victoria vein contains up to 5% pyrite, with a trace of chalcopyrite, locally associated with malachite on fracture surfaces. Fractures are common and are rich in limonite and also hematite. Native gold occurs on some fracture surfaces.  

Exploration History   


Only a limited amount of prospecting and hand trenching had been completed in the vicinity of the Victoria gold vein. Elsewhere, within the immediate region, limited exploration for both base and precious metals has been completed since the 1900’s. Sampling, mapping, and geophysical surveying were completed on a grid basis over the Victoria Vein and its extension. In addition limited backhoe trenching was completed on the vein.


Geological Report


We have obtained a geological report on the Vic Vein Mining claim that was prepared by Amanda Tremblay. Ms. Tremblay has an Honors Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from Queens University.  The geological report summarizes details concerning the Vic vein claim and makes a recommendation for further exploration work.


Based on her review of geological information relating to the Vic Vein Mining claim, Ms. Tremblay recommends an initial exploration program on the property consisting of grid emplacement, concentrated geological mapping and sampling, geophysical surveys and an initial drill hole.


Grid emplacement involves dividing the claim area into subsections in order to aid the plotting of exploration data.


Mapping involves plotting previous exploration data relating to a property on a map in order to determine the best



15



property locations to conduct subsequent exploration work.  Sampling consists of a geologist gathering pieces of rock or soil for mineral testing because they appear to contain valuable mineralization. 


Geophysical surveying is the search for mineral deposits by measuring the physical property of near-surface rocks, and looking for unusual responses caused by the presence of mineralization.  Electrical, magnetic, gravitational, seismic and radioactive properties are the ones most commonly measured. Geophysical surveys are applied in situations where there is insufficient information obtainable from the property surface to allow informed opinions concerning the merit of properties.


Drilling involves extracting a long cylinder of rock from the ground to determine amounts of metals at different depths.  Pieces of the rock obtained, known as drill core, are analyzed for mineral content.


Compliance with Government Regulation


We will be required to comply with all regulations, rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the exploration of minerals in Canada generally, and in British Columbia specifically.


We will have to sustain the cost of reclamation and environmental mediation for all exploration and development work undertaken.  The amount of these costs is not known at this time as we do not know the extent of the exploration program that will be undertaken beyond completion of the currently planned work programs. Because there is presently no information on the size, tenor, or quality of any resource or reserve at this time, it is impossible to assess the impact of any capital expenditures on earnings or our competitive position in the event a potentially economic deposit is discovered.


If we enter into production, the cost of complying with permit and regulatory environment laws will be greater than in the exploration phases because the impact on the project area is greater.  Permits and regulations will control all aspects of any production program if the project continues to that stage because of the potential impact on the environment. Examples of regulatory requirements include:



-

Water discharge will have to meet water standards;


-

Dust generation will have to be minimal or otherwise re-mediated;


-

Dumping of material on the surface will have to be re-contoured and re-vegetated;


-

An assessment of all material to be left on the surface will need to be environmentally benign;


-

Ground water will have to be monitored for any potential contaminants;


-

The socio-economic impact of the project will have to be evaluated and if deemed negative, will have to be re-mediated; and


-

There will have to be an impact report of the work on the local fauna and flora.


Because there will not be any appreciable disturbance to the land during the phase one and two exploration programs on the Vic Vein claim, we will not have to seek any government approvals prior to conducting exploration.


Employees


We have no employees as of the date of this prospectus other than our directors.


Research and Development Expenditures


We have not incurred any other research or development expenditures since our incorporation.




16



Subsidiaries


We do not have any subsidiaries.


Patents and Trademarks


We do not own, either legally or beneficially, any patents or trademarks.


Reports to Security Holders


Although we are not required to deliver a copy of our annual report to our security holders, we will voluntarily send a copy of our annual report, including audited financial statements, to any registered shareholder who requests it.  We will not be a reporting issuer with the Securities and Exchange Commission until our registration statement on Form S-1 is declared effective.


We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1, including exhibits and schedules, under the Securities Act of 1933, with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the sharesShares of our common stock offered throughCommon Stock to be sold in this prospectus.offering. This prospectus is filed asand any prospectus supplement which form a part of thatthe registration statement, but does not contain all of the information containedset forth in the registration statement or the exhibits and exhibits.  Statements made inschedules filed therewith. For further information about us and the securities covered by this prospectus, please see the registration statement are summaries of the material terms of the referenced contracts, agreements or documents of the company. We refer you to our registration statement and each exhibit attached to it for a more detailed description of matters involving the company, and the exhibits filed with the registration statement. Any statements we have made in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement concerning legal documents are qualified in their entirety by referencenot necessarily complete and you should read the documents that are filed as exhibits to these additional materials.  You may inspect the registration statement exhibits and schedulesor otherwise filed with the SecuritiesSEC for a more complete understanding of the document or matter.

We file annual, quarterly and Exchange Commissioncurrent reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read, without charge, and copy, at the Commission's principal office in Washington, D .C.  Copies ofprescribed rates, all or any partportion of the registration statement may be obtained fromor any reports, statements or other information in the Public Reference Section offiles at the Securities and Exchange Commission,public reference room at the SEC’s principal office at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C., 20549. PleaseYou may request copies of these documents, for a copying fee, by writing to the SEC. You may call the CommissionSEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of theits public reference rooms.  The Securities and Exchange Commissionroom. Our filings, including the registration statement, are also maintains a web siteavailable to you on the Internet website maintained by the SEC athttp://www.sec.gov that contains.

INFORMATION INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

All reports proxy statements and information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission.  This site contains information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically withdocuments subsequently filed by us pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 and 15(d) of the Commission.  OurExchange Act after (i) the date of the initial registration statement and prior to effectiveness of the referenced exhibits can also be found on this site.


Description Of Property


We have the right to explore forregistration statement, and extract minerals from the Vic Vein Mining claim.  We do not own any real property interest in the Vic Vein claim or any other property.


Legal Proceedings


We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings. Our address for service of process in Nevada is 2620 Regatta Dr. Suite 102, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128.


Market For Common Equity And Related Stockholder Matters


Our shares of common stock are quoted for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.  However, no liquid trading market for our shares has been established on the OTC Bulletin Board and there is no assurance that one will materialize.


Stockholders of Our Common Shares


As of(ii) the date of this registration statement, we have thirty-two registered shareholders.


Rule 144 Shares


Our shares of common stock are not currently available for resaleprospectus and prior to the public in accordance with the volume and trading limitationstermination or completion of Rule 144 of the Act because we are a shell company.  Our shareholders cannot rely on Rule 144 for the resale of our common stock until the following have occurred:


1.

we have ceasedthis offering, shall be deemed to be a shell company;



17



2.

we are subjectincorporated by reference in this prospectus and to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, which we are;

3.

we have filed all Exchange Act reports required for the past 12 months, which we have; and

4.

a minimum of one year has elapsed since we filed current Form 10 information on Form 8-K changing our statusbe part hereof from a shell company to a non-shell company.


When Rule 144 is available, our affiliate stockholders shall be entitled to sell within any three month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:

1.

1% of the number of shares of the company's common stock then outstanding which, in our case, will equal 47,000 shares as of the date of filing of such reports and other documents. Any information that we subsequently file with the SEC that is incorporated by reference as described above will automatically update and supersede any previous information that is part of this prospectus;prospectus.

Notwithstanding the statements in the preceding paragraph, no document, report or


2.

the average weekly trading volume exhibit (or portion of any of the company's common stock duringforegoing) or any other information that was furnished and deemed by the four calendar weeks precedingrules of the filing of a notice on  Form 144 with respectSEC not to the sale.have been filed shall be incorporated by reference into this prospectus.


Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about the company.



Registration Rights


We have not granted registration rightswill furnish without charge to the selling shareholdersyou, on written or tooral request, a copy of any other persons.


Dividends


There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distributionall of the dividend:


1.

we wouldreports or documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus but not be abledelivered with this prospectus, including exhibits that are specifically incorporated by reference in that information. You should direct any requests for documents to payRise Gold Corp., Attn: Corporate Secretary, Suite 650, 669 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 0B4, Canada, Telephone: (604) 260-4577.

77

You may also access these filings on our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or


2.

our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.


website at www.risegoldcorp.com. We have not declared any dividends, and we do not planincorporate the information on our website into this prospectus or any supplement to declarethis prospectus, and you should not consider any dividends ininformation on, or that can be accessed through, our website to be part of this prospectus or any supplement to this prospectus (other than those filings with the foreseeable future.


Financial Statements


IndexSEC that we specifically incorporate by reference into this prospectus or any supplement to Financial Statements:this prospectus).


78

1.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;


2.

Audited financial statements for the fiscal years ending July 31, 2009 and 2008, including:


a.

Balance Sheets;


b.

Statements of Operation;


c.

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity;


d.

Statements of Cash Flows; and


e.

Notes to Financial Statements








F-1

























ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 31, 2009

Period ended January 31, 2018
The following unaudited financial statements of the Company as at and for the six month period ended January 31, 2018 are attached as pages F-1 through F-16 and are included herein by reference:
Consolidated Interim Statement of Financial PositionF-2
Consolidated Interim Statement of Loss and Comprehensive LossF-3
Consolidated Interim Statement of Cash FlowsF-4
Consolidated Interim Statement of Stockholders’ EquityF-5
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial StatementsF-6
Years ended July 31, 2017 and July 31, 2016
The following audited financial statements of the Company as at and for the years ended July 31, 2017 and 2016 are attached as pages F-18 through F-36 and are included herein by reference:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-17
Balance SheetsF-18
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive LossF-19
Statements of Cash FlowsF-20
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)F-21
Notes to the Financial StatementsF-22 – F-35

 F-1

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

AS AT      
       
  January 31,  July 31, 
  2018  2017 
         
ASSETS        
         
Current        
Cash $143,375  $337,099 
Receivables  13,195   18,083 
Prepaid expenses  35,718   165,118 
         
   192,288   520,300 
         
Mineral property interests (Note 3)  4,540,097   3,789,854 
         
  $4,732,385  $4,310,154 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
         
Current        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 6) $124,894  $276,407 
Due to related parties (Note 6)  31,029   20,385 
Loan from related parties (Note 6)  37,494   38,079 
         
   193,417   334,871 
         
Stockholders’ equity        
Capital stock, $0.001 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized;        
80,944,982 (July 31, 2017 – 66,707,655) shares issued and outstanding (Note 7)  80,945   66,708 
Additional paid-in-capital (Note 7)  12,169,737   10,103,162 
Cumulative translation adjustment  (166,663)  (166,663)
Deficit  (7,545,051)  (6,027,924)
         
   4,538,968   3,975,283 
         
  $4,732,385  $4,310,154 
         
Nature and continuance of operations (Note 1)        
Contingency (Note 4)        
Subsequent event (Note 10)        
         

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

 F-2

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENT OF LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

  Three months  Three months  Six months  Six months 
  ended January  ended January  ended January  ended January 
  31, 2018  31, 2017  31, 2018  31, 2017 
                 
EXPENSES                
Consulting (Note 6) $21,500  $98,029  $39,500  $195,171 
Directors fees  34,757   -   50,855   - 
Filing and regulatory  46,902   9,073   61,514   19,204 
Foreign exchange  (887)  (548)  (21,688)  1,407 
Gain on settlement of payables  -   (11,415)  (1,608)  (11,415)
General and administrative  50,134   57,648   105,436   60,006 
Geological, mineral and prospect costs (Note 3)  535,683   -   709,677   - 
Professional fees  75,594   63,958   224,057   93,752 
Promotion and shareholder communication  113,061   250,228   258,307   267,673 
Property investigation costs  -   55,253   -   55,253 
Salaries (Note 6)  46,077   31,994   91,077   64,225 
Share-based payments (Note 7)  -   464,159   -   570,255 
                 
Net loss and comprehensive loss $(922,821) $(1,018,379) $(1,517,127) $(1,315,531)
                 
Basic and diluted loss per common share $(0.01) $(0.02) $(0.02) $(0.04)
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding  76,687,997   41,459,255   69,996,744   37,360,584 
                 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

 F-3

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JANUARY 31

  2018  2017 
         
         
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Loss for the period $(1,517,127) $(1,315,531)
Items not involving cash        
Gain on settlement of payables  (1,608)  (11,415)
Shares issued for compensation  -   60,000 
Share-based payments  -   570,255 
Unrealized foreign exchange  (711)  (3,721)
Non-cash working capital item changes:        
Receivables  4,888   (2,750)
Prepaid expenses  129,400   (507,745)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  (51,970)  33,816 
Due to related parties  10,644   (5,720)
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,426,484)  (1,182,811)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Mineral property  (750,243)  (2,786,872)
         
Net cash used in investing activities  (750,243)  (2,786,872)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Private placement  2,044,120   4,476,900 
Warrants exercised  19,267   27,208 
Share issuance costs  (80,384)  (119,950)
Subscriptions received in advance  -   43,750 
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  1,983,003   4,427,908 
         
Change in cash for the period  (193,724)  458,225 
         
Cash, beginning of period  337,099   139,021 
         
Cash, end of period $143,375  $597,246 
         
Cash paid for:        
Interest $-  $- 
Income taxes $-  $- 
         

Supplemental cash flow information (Note 8)



F-2The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.


 F-4


RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)


  Capital Stock                
           Subscriptions  Cumulative       
        Additional  Received in  Translation       
  Number  Amount  Paid-in Capital  Advance  Adjustment  Deficit  Total 
                             
Balance as at July 31, 2016  32,866,261  $32,867  $2,475,194  $-  $(166,663) $(1,836,969) $504,429 
Shares issued for cash  22,384,500   22,385   4,454,515   -   -   -   4,476,900 
Shares issued for mineral property  920,000   920   183,080   -   -   -   184,000 
Shares issued for compensation  400,000   400   59,600   -   -   -   60,000 
Warrants exercised  272,080   272   26,936   -   -   -   27,208 
Subscriptions received in advance  -   -   -   43,750   -   -   43,750 
Share issuance costs  -   -   (237,853)  -   -   -   (237,853)
Share-based payments  -   -   570,255   -   -   -   570,255 
Loss for the period  -   -   -   -   -   (1,315,531)  (1,315,531)
                             
Balance as at January 31, 2017  56,842,841  $56,844  $7,531,727  $43,750  $(166,663) $(3,152,500) $4,313,158 
Shares issued for cash  9,464,814   9,464   2,176,543   (43,750)  -   -   2,142,257 
Options exercised  400,000   400   59,600   -   -   -   60,000 
Share issuance costs  -   -   (104,517)  -   -   -   (104,517)
Share-based payments  -   -   439,809   -   -   -   439,809 
Loss for the period  -   -   -   -   -   (2,875,424)  (2,875,424)
                             
Balance as at July 31, 2017  66,707,655  $66,708  $10,103,162  $-  $(166,663) $(6,027,924) $3,975,283 
Shares issued for cash  13,627,473   13,627   2,030,493   -   -   -   2,044,120 
Shares issued for debt conversion  417,184   417   95,535   -   -   -   95,952 
Warrants exercised  192,670   193   19,074   -   -   -   19,267 
Share issuance costs  -   -   (78,527)  -   -   -   (78,527)
Loss for the period  -   -   -   -   -   (1,517,127)  (1,517,127)
                             
Balance as at January 31, 2018  80,944,982  $80,945  $12,169,737  $-  $(166,663) $(7,545,051) $4,538,968 
                             

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

 F-5

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

K. R. MARGETSON LTD.

1.

 CHARTEREDACCOUNTANT

NATURE AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Stockholders,

Rise Gold Corp. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated as Atlantic Resources Inc.


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Atlantic Resources Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) as of July 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended July 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from February 9, 2007 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2009.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America).  Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.


In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of July 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for years ended July 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from February 9, 2007 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company is an exploration stage company and has yet to commence operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans in regard to their planned financing and other matters are also described in Note 2.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.









North Vancouver, Canada

“K R. MARGETSON LTD.”

October 28, 2009

Chartered Accountant



331 East 5th Street

Tel: 604.929.0819

North Vancouver BC  

Fax: 1-877-874-9583

V7L 1M1

info@krmargetson.com




F-3



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008



 

July 31

       July 31

 

2009

      2008

ASSETS

 

 

 

Current

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $           1,539

$          4,664

 

 

 

Total Assets

$           1,539

$          4,664

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Current

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities – Note 4

$         11,216

 $          7,880

Due to related party – Note 5

5,591

500

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

16,807

8,380


STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

 

 

Capital stock – Note 7

 

 

Authorized

 

 

70,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001

 

 

Issued and outstanding

 

 

4,700,000 common shares

4,700

4,700

Additional paid-in capital

24,500

24,500

Deficit, accumulated during the exploration stage

(44,468)

 (32,916)

 

 

 

Total Stockholders’ Deficit

 (15,268)

 (3,716)

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit

$          1,539

$           4,664



Going Concern – Note 2








SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES



F-4



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

for the years ended July 31, 2009 and 2008

and for the period from February 9, 2007 (Date of Inception)

to July 31, 2009



 

Year ended

July 31, 2009

Year ended

July 31, 2008

Accumulated for the Period February 9, 2007 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Geological, mineral and prospect costs

$               -

$        5,000

$         12,500

General and administrative

5,328

5,491

10,878

Incorporation costs

-

-

500

Professional fees

6,224

13,366

20,590

 

 

 

 

Net loss for the period

$  (11,552)

$   (23,857)

$      (44,468)

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per common share

$    (0.002)

$     (0.005)

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares used in per share calculations

4,700,000

4,700,000

 







SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES



F-5



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

for the years ended July 31, 2009 and 2008

and for the period from February 9, 2007 (Date of Inception)

to July 31, 2009



 

 

 

Accumulated for the

 

 

 

Period  from

 

 

 

February 9, 2007

 

Year ended

Year ended

(Date of Inception) to

 

July 31

July 31

July 31

 

2009

2008

2009

 


 


Operating Activities


 


Loss for the period

$    (11,552)

$         (23,857)

$        (44,468)

Changes in non-cash working capital items

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

3,336

6,880

11,216

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) Operating Activities

(8,216)

 (16,977)

(33,352)

 

 

 

 

Financing Activities

 

 

 

Advance from related party

 5,091

-

5,591

Common stock issued for cash

-

-

29,200

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by Financing Activities

 5,091

 -

34,79

 

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents During The Period

(3,125)

(16,977)


1,539

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period

4,664

21,641

-

-

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period

$        1,539

$            4,664

 $           1,539

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplementary disclosure of dash flow information

 

 

 

Cash paid for

 

 

 

Interest

 $                -

 $                     -

$                   -

Income taxes

$                -

 $                     -

$                   -








SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES



F-6



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

for the period from February 9, 2007

(Date of Inception)

to July 31, 2009



 





Additional

 

 

 

Common Stock

Paid-in

Accumulated

 

 

Shares

Amount

Capital

Deficit

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, February 9, 2007

--

$              --

$               --

$                --

$                --

Shares issued for cash at $.001

per share March 12, 2007

3,000,000

 3,000

--

 --

 3,000

Shares issued for cash at $.001

per share March 14, 2007

1,200,000

1,200

 --

--

 1,200

Shares issued for cash at $.05

per share at April 26, 2007

500,000

500

 24,500

--

 25,000

Net loss for the period ended

July 31, 2007


--


--

 --

 

 ( 9,059)

 

( 9,059)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, July 31, 2007

4,700,000

 4,700

 24,500

(9,059)

20,141

Net loss for the year ended

July 31, 2008


--


--

 --

 

 (23,857)

 

( 23,857)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, July 31, 2008

4,700,000

 $      4,700

 $     24,500

$     (32,916)

$        (3,716)

Net loss for the year ended

July 31, 2009


--


--

 --

 

 (11,552)

 

( 11,552)

 

4,700,000

$      4,700

 $     24,500

$     (44,468)

$      (15,268)










SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES



F-7



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 31, 2009



Note 1

Operations


The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on February 9, 2007 and is in the exploration stage. On April 11, 2012, the Company merged its wholly-owned subsidiary, Patriot Minefinders Inc., a Nevada corporation, in and to the Company to effect a name change to Patriot Minefinders Inc. On January 14, 2015, the Company completed a name change to Rise Resources Inc. in the same manner. On April 7, 2017, the Company changed its name to Rise Gold Corp. These mergers were carried out solely for the purpose of effecting these changes of names.

On February 16, 2015, the Company increased its authorized capital from 21,000,000 shares to 400,000,000 shares.

On January 29, 2016, the Company completed an initial public offering in Canada and began trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”) on February 1, 2016. On November 28, 2017, the Company ceased trading on the OTC Pink Market and began trading on the OTCQB Venture Market.

The Company is engaged in activities related to the exploration for mineral resources in Canada. In 2007 the Company acquired the rights to a mineral property located in the Provinceearly stages of British Columbia, Canada,exploration and has not yet determined whether this property contains reserves that are economically recoverable.as is common with any exploration company, it raises financing for its acquisition activities. The recoverability of amounts from the property will be dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, confirmation of the Company’s interest in the underlying property, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to satisfy expenditure requirements and to complete the development of the property and upon future profitable production or proceeds from the sale thereof.


The Company has adopted July 31as its fiscal year end.


Note 2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Going Concern


Theseaccompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which presumes that the Company will continue operations for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of business.The Company has incurred a loss of $1,517,127 for the period ended January 31, 2018 and has accumulated a deficit of $44,468 since inception, has yet to achieve profitable operations and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business, raising$7,545,051. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. ItsThe ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent uponon the Company’s ability of the Company to generate profitable operations in the future and/ormaintain continued support from its shareholders and creditors and to obtain the necessary financing to meetraise additional capital and implement its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.  Theseplan. The consolidated financial statements do not reflect theinclude any adjustments or reclassifications to the assets and liabilities which wouldthat might be necessary if the Company wasis unable to continue as a going concern.

At January 31, 2018, the Company had working capital deficiency of $1,129.

2.BASIS OF PREPARATION

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for financial information with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-K. Results are not necessarily indicative of results which may be achieved in the future. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains the audited financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis, for the year ended July 31, 2017. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. The operating results for the six months ended January 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended July 31, 2018.

Basis of Consolidation

These condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its operations.  Management planswholly-owned subsidiary Rise Grass Valley Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

 F-6

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.BASIS OF PREPARATION(continued)

Basis of Consolidation(continued)

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Company has exposure to obtain short-term loansvariable returns from its involvement and has the ability to use power over the investee to affect its returns. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Company controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the director ofdate on which control is transferred to the Company.  Company until the date on which control ceases.


Revenue Recognition


The accounts of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains or losses on transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.

Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”. This ASU eliminates the current requirement to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent amounts in a classified balance sheet and replaces it with a noncurrent classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods beginning after March 17, 2018, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company recognizes revenue whenis currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities”. This ASU amendment addresses aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. It affects investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value, and simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without a contractreadily determinable fair value by requiring a qualitative assessment. The ASU applies to all entities and is in place, mineralseffective for annual periods beginning after March 17, 2018, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard.

Other than the above, the Company has determined that other significant newly issued accounting pronouncements are deliveredeither not applicable to the purchaser and collectabilityCompany’s business or that no material effect is reasonably assured.expected on the financial statements as a result of future adoption.







F-8



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 31, 2009



Note 2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)


Use of Estimates


The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates include the carrying value and recoverability of mineral properties and the recognition of deferred tax assets based on the change in unrecognized deductible temporary tax differences. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and would impact future results of operations and cash flows.

 F-7

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

3.MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS

The Company’s mineral properties balance consists of:

  Indata, British
Columbia
  Klondike, British
Columbia
  Idaho-Maryland,
California
  Total 
             
Balance, July 31, 2016 $50,000  $513,031  $-  $563,031 
Cash paid  -   -   3,605,854   3,605,854 
Shares issued  -   -   184,000   184,000 
Write-off  (50,000)  (513,031)  -   (563,031)
                 
Balance, July 31, 2017  -   -   3,789,854   3,789,854 
Cash paid  -   -   750,243   750,243 
                 
Balance, January 31, 2018 $-  $-  $4,540,097  $4,540,097 

Title to mineral properties

Title to mineral properties involves certain inherent risks due to the difficulties of determining the validity of certain mineral titles as well as the potential for problems arising from the frequently ambiguous conveying history characteristic of many mineral properties. As at January 31, 2018, the Company holds title to the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine Property.

Indata, British Columbia

On May 18, 2015, the Company entered into an option agreement with Eastfield Resources Ltd., (“Eastfield”), pursuant to which Eastfield granted the Company the exclusive and irrevocable right to acquire up to a 75% interest in and to certain claims in the Indata property located in the Omineca Mining Division in British Columbia, Canada, for total consideration of $450,000 in cash and minimum aggregate exploration expenditures of $2,500,000. As at July 31, 2017, the Company had paid $50,000 towards the 75% interest earn-in and incurred cumulative exploration expenditures of $4,035 on the Indata property. During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company terminated its option agreement with Eastfield; accordingly, the Company has written off $50,000 in acquisition costs in relation to the Indata property as at July 31, 2017.

Klondike, British Columbia

On May 26, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Klondike Gold Corp. (“Klondike”) regarding the purchase of a portfolio of seven gold and base metal properties in southeast British Columbia for total consideration of $200,000 cash, the issuance of 3,500,000 common shares, and the issuance of 2,500,000 warrants. As at July 31, 2017, the Company had paid Klondike $50,000 in cash, issued 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $240,000, and issued 1,500,000 warrants valued at $223,031 (discount rate – 0.49%, volatility – 200.64%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable at $0.227 per share until July 13, 2018, and incurred cumulative exploration expenditures of $10,408 on the Klondike properties. During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company terminated the purchase agreement with Klondike and paid a settlement of $100,000 to Klondike; accordingly the Company has written off $513,031 in acquisition costs in relation to the Klondike properties as at July 31, 2017.

 F-8

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

3.MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS(continued)

Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine Property, California

On August 30, 2016, the Company entered into an option agreement with three parties to purchase a 100% interest in and to the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property located near Grass Valley, California, United States; pursuant to the option agreement, in order to exercise the option, the Company was to have paid US$2,000,000 by November 30, 2016. Upon execution of the option agreement, the Company paid the vendors a non-refundable cash deposit in the amount of $32,758 (US$25,000), which was credited against the purchase price of US$2,000,000 upon exercise of the option. On November 30, 2016, the Company negotiated an extension of the closing date of the option agreement to December 26, 2016, in return for a cash payment of $32,758 (US$25,000), which was credited against the purchase price of US$2,000,000 upon exercise of the option. On December 28, 2016, the Company negotiated a further no-cost extension of the closing date of the option agreement to April 30, 2017. On January 25, 2017, the Company exercised the option by paying $2,588,625 (US$1,950,000), and acquired a 100% interest in the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property. In connection with the option agreement, the Company agreed to pay a cash commission of $184,000 (US$140,000) equal to 7 per cent of the purchase price of US$2,000,000; the commission was settled on January 25, 2017 through the issuance of 920,000 units valued at $0.20 per unit (Note 7). The Company also incurred additional transaction costs of $144,391, which have been included in the carrying value of the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine.

On January 6, 2017, the Company entered into an option agreement with Sierra Pacific Industries Inc. (“Sierra”) to purchase a 100% interest in and to certain surface rights totalling approximately 82 acres located near Grass Valley, California, United States, contiguous to the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property acquired by the Company on January 25, 2017. Pursuant to the option agreement, in order to exercise the option, the Company was to have paid US$1,900,000 by March 31, 2017. Upon execution of the option agreement, the Company paid the vendors a non-refundable cash deposit in the amount of $132,732 (US$100,000), which will be credited against the purchase price of US$1,900,000 upon exercise of the option. On April 3, 2017, the Company negotiated an extension of the closing date of the option agreement to June 30, 2017, in return for a cash payment of $268,000 (US$200,000), at which time a payment of US$1,600,000 was due in order to exercise the option. On June 7, 2017, the Company negotiated an extension of the closing date of the option agreement to September 30, 2017, in return for a cash payment of $406,590 (US$300,000), at which time a payment of US$1,300,000 was due in order to exercise the option. On September 1, 2017, the Company negotiated a third extension of the closing date of the option agreement to June 30, 2018 in return for cash payments as follows: US$300,000 by September 30, 2017 (paid $372,078), US$300,000 by December 30, 2017 (paid $378,165), US$300,000 by March 30, 2018, and a final payment of US$400,000 by June 30, 2018, which comprise the remaining purchase price of US$1,300,000 in full. At January 31, 2018 a total of US$700,000 is still required to be paid under the agreement to exercise the option.

 F-9

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

3.MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS(continued)

Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine Property, California(continued)

As at January 31, 2018, the Company has incurred cumulative property investigation costs of $55,253 and cumulative exploration expenditures of $1,085,657 on the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property as follows:

  Six month period
ended January 31,
2018
  Year ended
July 31, 2017
 
       
Opening balance $375,980  $- 
Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine expenditures:        
Consulting $163,059  $287,411 
Exploration  387,047   54,753 
Rent  12,613   10,968 
Supplies  104,804   4,020 
Sampling  29,365   8,623 
Travel  12,789   10,205 
Total expenditures $709,677  $375,980 
         
Closing balance $1,085,657  $375,980 

4.CONTINGENCY

During the year ended July 31, 2014, the Company entered into a binding letter of intent (“LOI”) with Wundr Software Inc. (“Wundr”). Under the terms of the LOI, the Company would acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Wundr. Due to unforeseen circumstances, the Company did not complete the transactions contemplated in the LOI, which the Company announced had expired on January 10, 2014.

On September 17, 2014, the Company learned that it was the subject, along with a number of additional defendants, of a notice of civil claim (the “Claim”) filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia by Wundr, under which Wundr is seeking general damages from the Company as well as damages for conspiracy to cause economic harm.  None of the allegations contained in the Claim have been proven in court. Management has determined that the probability of the Claim resulting in an unfavourable outcome and financial loss to the Company is unlikely.

5.PROMISSORY NOTES PAYABLE

During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company issued promissory notes totalling $220,000, accruing interest in advance at 10% every three months, maturing on June 29, 2017. Subsequently, the Company and one promissory note holder agreed to reduce the interest rate to 7.2% and make an early repayment of principal of $100,000 and accrued interest of $7,200. The remaining principal of $120,000 and accrued interest of $12,000 was also repaid during the year ended July 31, 2017.

6.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Key management personnel consist of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the directors of the Company. The remuneration of the key management personnel is as follows:

a)Salaries of $90,000 (2017 - $60,000) and nil (2017 – 400,000) shares of common stock valued at $nil (2017 - $60,000), recognized in consulting expense, to the CEO of the Company;

b)Consulting fees of $nil (2017 - $33,617) to the former CEO of the Company.

 F-10

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

6.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS(continued)

c)Consulting fees of $24,000 (2017 - $18,000) to the CFO of the Company, and consulting fees of $7,500 (2017 - $2,896) to a company in which the CFO holds a 50% interest.

d)Consulting fees of $7,500 (2017 - $2,896) to a company in which a former director of the Company holds a 50% interest.

e)Directors fees of $50,855 (2017 - $Nil) to directors of the Company.

f)Share-based payments of $nil (2017 - $106,096) to the CEO and directors of the Company.

As at January 31, 2018, the Company has recorded loans from related parties of $37,494 (US$30,500) (July 31, 2017 - $38,079 (US$30,500)) representing advances made by a director and a former director and officer. The advances are due on demand without interest.

As at January 31, 2018, included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is $31,029 (July 31, 2017 - $20,385) in accounts and advances payable and accrued liabilities to current and former officers and companies controlled by directors and officers of the Company.

7.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL

Issued Capital Stock

On August 1, 2016, the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.15 per share to the Company’s CEO as compensation. The shares were valued at $60,000 on issuance and were recognized as consulting expense.

On November 1, 2016 and November 7, 2016, the Company issued a total of272,080 shares of common stock upon the exercise of finders’ warrants at a price of $0.10 per share.

On January 25, 2017, the Company issued 920,000 units valued at $0.20 per unit to an individual pursuant to a debt conversion by the individual in the amount of $184,000 (US$140,000), representing a cash commission equal to seven per cent of the US$2,000,000 purchase price of the Idaho-Maryland property (Note 3).Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On August 9, 2017, the Company issued 417,184 units valued at $0.23 per unit to a third party pursuant to a debt conversion by the third party in the amount of $95,952, representing finders’ fees payable on the private placement which closed May 5, 2017.Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On January 29, 2018, the Company issued a total of192,670 shares of common stock upon the exercise of finders’ warrants at a price of $0.10 per share.

 F-11

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL (continued)

Private Placements

On December 23, 2016, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 21,044,500 units at a price of $0.20 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,208,900. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $218,410, other share issuance costs of $15,723, and issued a total of 1,104,300 finders’ warrants valued at $191,724 (discount rate – 0.76%, volatility – 179.53%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On January 24, 2017, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 1,340,000 units at a price of $0.20 per unit for gross proceeds of $268,000. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $5,220 and issued a total of 26,100 finders’ warrants valued at $5,919 (discount rate – 0.76%, volatility – 175.85%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On February 6, 2017, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 455,000 units at a price of $0.25 per unit for gross proceeds of $113,750. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $2,625 and issued a total of 10,500 finders’ warrants valued at $2,657 (discount rate – 0.70%, volatility – 175.86%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On May 5, 2017, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 9,009,814 units at a price of $0.23 per unit for gross proceeds of $2,072,257. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $100,392 and issued a total of 436,488 finders’ warrants valued at $92,991 (discount rate – 0.67%, volatility – 170.28%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On September 26, 2017, the Company completed the first tranche of a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 7,077,140 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $1,061,570. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $540 and issued a total of 3,600 finders’ warrants valued at $388 (discount rate – 1.59%, volatility – 150.97%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On December 27, 2017, the Company completed the second tranche of a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 6,417,000 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $962,550. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $55,779 and issued a total of 371,860 finders’ warrants valued at $28,997 (discount rate – 1.64%, volatility – 139.85%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

 F-12

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL (continued)

Private Placements(continued)

On January 3, 2018, the Company completed the third and final tranche of a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 133,333 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $20,000. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

Stock Options

During the six month period ended January 31, 2018, the Company did not grant any stock options.

During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company granted:

a)a total of 2,729,142 stock options to the Company’s CEO, exercisable at a weighted average price of $0.23 per share for a period of five years;

b)500,000 incentive stock options to an investor relations consultant, each option exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.33 until February 7, 2020.

c)500,000 stock options to a director of the Company, exercisable at a price of $0.27 per share until April 3, 2022.

d)900,000 stock options to two directors of the Company, exercisable at a price of $0.28 per share until April 20, 2020.

The following incentive stock options were outstanding at January 31, 2018:

 Number
of Options
  Exercise
Price
  Expiry Date
        
  1,100,000  $0.15  March 22, 2021
  586,600   0.20  August 8, 2021
  2,142,542   0.24  December 27, 2021
  500,000*  0.33  February 7, 2020
  500,000   0.27  April 3, 2022
  900,000   0.28  April 30, 2020
  5,729,142  $0.24   
          
*cancelled subsequent to January 31, 2018

Stock option transactions are summarized as follows:

  Number of Options  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 
          
Balance, July 31, 2016  2,700,000  $0.15   Nil 
Options granted  4,629,142   0.26   Nil 
Options exercised  (400,000)  (0.15)  Nil 
Options expired/forfeited  (1,200,000)  (0.15)  Nil 
             
Balance outstanding and exercisable,
July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2018
  5,729,142  $0.24   

 

Nil

 

 F-13

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL (continued)

Warrants

The following warrants were outstanding at January 31, 2018:

 Number
of Warrants
  Exercise
Price
  Expiry Date
        
  1,500,000  $0.227  July 13, 2018
  22,148,800   0.40  December 23, 2018
  2,286,100   0.40  January 24, 2019
  465,500   0.40  February 6, 2019
  9,863,486   0.40  May 5, 2019
  7,080,740   0.25  September 25, 2019
  6,788,860   0.25  December 27, 2019
  133,333   0.25  January 3, 2020
  50,266,819  $0.35   
          

Warrant transactions are summarized as follows:

  Number of
Warrants
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
       
Balance, July 31, 2016  1,964,750  $0.20 
Warrants issued  34,346,702   0.40 
Warrants exercised  (272,080)  (0.10)
         
Balance, July 31, 2017  36,039,372  $0.39 
Warrants issued  14,420,117   0.25 
Warrants exercised  (192,670)  (0.10)
         
Balance, January 31, 2018  50,266,819  $0.35 

During the six month period ended January 31, 2018, the Company issued a total of 375,460 (2017 – 1,130,400) finders’ warrants with a weighted average fair value of $0.08 (2017 - $0.17) per warrant.

The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model valuation of finders’ warrants issued during the period:

       
  2018  2017 
       
Risk-free interest rate  1.64%  0.76%
Expected life of warrants  2.0 years   2.0 years 
Expected annualized volatility  139.95%  179.45%
Dividend  Nil   Nil 
Forfeiture rate  0%  0%

 F-14

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL (continued)

Share-Based Payments

The Company has a stock option plan under which it is authorized to grant options to executive officers and directors, employees and consultants enabling them to acquire up to 10% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Under the plan the exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock, less any applicable discount, as calculated on the date of grant. The options can be granted for a maximum term of 5 years with vesting determined by the board of directors.

During the six month period ended January 31, 2018, the Company granted nil (2017 – 2,729,142) stock options with a weighted average fair value of $nil (2017 - $0.21) per share, recognizing share-based payments expense of $nil (2017 - $570,255).

The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model valuation of stock options granted during the period:

       
  2018  2017 
       
Risk-free interest rate  N/A   0.98%
Expected life of options  N/A   5.00 years 
Expected annualized volatility  N/A   1147.36%
Dividend  N/A   Nil 
Forfeiture rate  N/A   0%

8.SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS

During the six month period ended January 31, 2018, the Company:

a)Issued a total of 375,460 finders’ warrants valued at $29,385 recorded as share issuance costs (Note 7);

b)Issued 417,184 units, each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one share purchase warrant, valued at $95,952, pursuant to a debt conversion in relation to finders’ fees payable on the private placement which closed on May 5, 2017 (Note 7); and

c)Accrued $5,700 in share issuance costs through accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

During the six month period ended January 31, 2017, the Company

a)Issued 1,130,400 agent warrants valued at $197,643 (Note 7);

b)Issued 920,000 units, each unit comprising one common share and one share purchase warrant, valued at $184,000 for a debt conversion in relation to mineral property acquisition (Note 7); and

c)Accrued $117,903 in share issuance costs through accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

9.SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company has two reportable segments, being the acquisition of exploration and evaluation assets located in British Columbia, Canada, and California, United States.

 F-15

RISE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

10.SUBSEQUENT EVENT

Subsequent to January 31, 2018, 500,000 stock options exercisable at a price of $0.33 were cancelled pursuant to a contract termination.

 F-16

(DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP LOGO)

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Directors of

Rise Gold Corp.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Rise Gold Corp. (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of July 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended July 31, 2017 and 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rise Gold Corp. as of July 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended July 31, 2017 and 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that Rise Gold Corp. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Rise Gold Corp. has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency. These matters, along with the other matters set forth in Note 1, indicate the existence of material uncertainties that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

“DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP”

Vancouver, CanadaChartered Professional Accountants

October 27, 2017

(NEXIA LOGO)

1200 - 609 Granville Street, P.0. Box 10372, Pacific Centre, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V7Y 1G6

Telephone (604) 687-0947 Davidson-co.com

 F-17

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
AS AT

  July 31,
2017
  July 31,
2016
 
       
ASSETS        
         
Current        
Cash $337,099  $139,021 
Receivables  18,083   20,021 
Prepaid expenses  165,118   9,566 
         
   520,300   168,608 
         
Mineral property interests (Note 4)  3,789,854   563,031 
         
  $4,310,154  $731,639 
         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
Current        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $296,792  $183,996 
Loan from related parties (Note 8)  38,079   43,214 
         
   334,871   227,210 
         
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)        
Capital stock, $0.001 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 66,707,655 (July 31, 2016 – 32,866,261) shares issued and outstanding (Note 9)  66,708   32,867 
Additional paid-in-capital (Note 9)  10,103,162   2,475,194 
Cumulative translation adjustment  (166,663)  (166,663)
Deficit  (6,027,924)  (1,836,969)
         
   3,975,283   504,429 
         
  $4,310,154  $731,639 

Nature and continuance of operations (Note 1)

Long-term receivable and contingency(Note 5)

Subsequent events (Note 13)

Approved and authorized by the Board on October 27, 2017.

“Benjamin Mossman”Director“Cale Thomas”Director
Benjamin MossmanCale Thomas

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 F-18

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31,

  2017  2016 
       
       
EXPENSES        
Bad debt expense (Note 6) $-  $7,126 
Consulting  505,842   102,420 
Directors fees  17,288   - 
Filing and regulatory  53,661   30,927 
Foreign exchange  6,931   1,959 
Gain on settlement of payables  (12,355)  (41,982)
General and administrative  152,920   20,839 
Geological, mineral, and prospect costs (Note 4)  375,980   - 
Professional fees  273,738   107,197 
Promotion and shareholder communication  983,851   10,408 
Property investigation costs  55,253   20,201 
Salaries  104,751   5,365 
Share-based payments (Note 9)  1,010,064   369,006 
Settlement payment (Note 4)  100,000   - 
Write off mineral property costs (Note 4)  563,031   - 
         
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year $(4,190,955) $(633,466)
         
Basic and diluted loss per common share $(0.08) $(0.02)
         
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding  49,516,659   31,556,200 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 F-19

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31,

  2017  2016 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Loss for the year $(4,190,955) $(633,466)
Items not involving cash        
Bad debt expense  -   7,126 
Gain on settlement of payables  (12,355)  (41,982)
Shares issued for compensation  60,000   - 
Share-based payments  1,010,064   369,006 
Unrealized foreign exchange  (5,004)  2,644 
Write off of mineral property costs  563,031   - 
Non-cash working capital item changes:        
Receivables  1,938   (22,206)
Prepaid expenses  (155,552)  (9,566)
Accounts payables and accrued liabilities and due to related parties  24,592   52,145 
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (2,704,241)  (276,299)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITY        
         
Mineral property  (3,605,854)  (80,000)
         
Net cash used in investing activity  (3,605,854)  (80,000)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITY        
Private placement  6,662,907   605,000 
Warrants exercised  27,208   1,925 
Options exercised  60,000   - 
Share issuance costs  (241,942)  (83,105)
Loan repayments  -   (46,500)
         
Net cash provided by financing activity  6,508,173   477,320 
         
Change in cash for the year  198,078   121,021 
         
Cash, beginning of year  139,021   18,000 
         
Cash, end of year $337,099  $139,021 
         
Interest $-  $- 
Income taxes  -   - 

Supplemental cash flow information (Note 11)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 F-20

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

  

Capital Stock

             
  

Number

  

Amount

  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment
  

 

Equity
(Deficit)

  

 

 

Total

 
                         
Balance as at July 31, 2015  38,297,197  $38,298  $1,157,868  $(166,663) $(1,203,503) $(174,000)
Shares surrender and cancellation (Note 8)  (13,000,186)  (13,000)  13,000   -   -   - 
Shares issued for cash  6,069,250   6,069   600,856   -   -   606,925 
Shares issued for mineral property  1,500,000   1,500   238,500   -   -   240,000 
Warrants issued for mineral property  -   -   223,031   -   -   223,031 
Share issuance costs  -   -   (127,067)  -   -   (127,067)
Share-based payments  -   -   369,006   -   -   369,006 
Loss for the year  -   -   -   -   (633,466)  (633,466)
                         
Balance as at July 31, 2016  32,866,261  $32,867  $2,475,194   (166,663) $(1,836,969) $504,429 
Shares issued for cash  31,849,314   31,849   6,631,058   -   -   6,662,907 
Shares issued for mineral property  920,000   920   183,080   -   -   184,000 
Shares issued for compensation  400,000   400   59,600   -   -   60,000 
Warrants exercised  272,080   272   26,936   -   -   27,208 
Options exercised  400,000   400   59,600   -   -   60,000 
Share issuance costs  -   -   (342,370)  -   -   (342,370)
Share-based payments  -   -   1,010,064   -   -   1,010,064 
Loss for the year  -   -   -   -   (4,190,955)  (4,190,955)
                         
Balance as at July 31, 2017  66,707,655  $66,708  $10,103,162   (166,663) $(6,027,924) $3,975,283 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 F-21

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

1.NATURE AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

Rise Gold Corp. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated as Atlantic Resources Inc. in the State of Nevada on February 9, 2007 and is in the exploration stage. On April 11, 2012, the Company merged its wholly-owned subsidiary, Patriot Minefinders Inc., a Nevada corporation, in and to the Company to effect a name change to Patriot Minefinders Inc. On January 14, 2015, the Company completed a name change to Rise Resources Inc. in the same manner. On April 7, 2017, the Company changed its name to Rise Gold Corp. These mergers were carried out solely for the purpose of effecting these changes of names.

On February 16, 2015, the Company increased its authorized capital from 21,000,000 shares to 400,000,000 shares.

On January 29, 2016, the Company completed an initial public offering in Canada and began trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”) on February 1, 2016.

The Company is in the early stages of exploration and as is common with any exploration company, it raises financing for its acquisition activities. The accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which presumes that the Company will continue operations for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred a loss of $4,190,955 for the year ended July 31, 2017 and has accumulated a deficit of $6,027,924. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to maintain continued support from its shareholders and creditors and to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

At July 31, 2017, the Company had working capital of $185,429.

2.BASIS OF PREPARATION

Generally accepted accounting principles

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for financial information with the instructions to Form 10-K and Regulation S-K.

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Rise Grass Valley Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts reported inof assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and accompanying disclosures. Although thesethe reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates areinclude the carrying value and recoverability of mineral properties and the recognition of deferred tax assets based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertakechange in the future, actualunrecognized deductible temporary tax differences. Actual results may ultimatelycould differ from the estimates.  Management believes suchthose estimates, to be reasonable.and would impact future results of operations and cash flows.

 F-22

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

3.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Receivables

Exploration Stage Company


As an exploration stage Company, it is a type of development stage company as defined in Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification 205-915.  Accordingly, the Company devotes substantially all of its present efforts to establish its business and its planned principal operations have not commenced.  All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.


Cash Equivalents


The Company considersreviews all highly liquid instruments with a maturityreceivables that exceed terms and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based on management’s assessment of three months or lessthe collectability of trade and other receivables.

Mineral property

The costs of acquiring mineral rights are capitalized at the timedate of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at July 31, 2009,acquisition. After acquisition, various factors can affect the Company did not have any cash equivalents. (2008 – $nil).  


Mineral Property Costs


Pastrecoverability of the capitalized costs. If, after review, management concludes that the carrying amount of a mineral property acquisition, exploration and developmentis impaired, it will be written down to estimated fair value. Exploration costs have beenincurred on mineral properties are expensed as incurred. Development costs incurred until such time as economicon proven and probable reserves are quantified, at which time the Company would capitalize all costs to the extent that future cash flows from mineral reserves equal or exceed the costs deferred The deferredwill be capitalized. Upon commencement of production, capitalized costs will be amortized using the unit-of-production method over the recoverableestimated life of the ore body based on proven and probable reserves when(which exclude non-recoverable reserves and anticipated processing losses). When the Company receives an option payment related to a property, reaches commercial production.  Coststhe proceeds of the payment are applied to reduce the carrying value of the exploration asset.

Long-lived assets

Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, the recoverability test is performed using undiscounted net cash flows related to site restoration programs willthe long-lived assets. If such assets are considered to be accruedimpaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Asset retirement obligations

The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the long-lived assets. The Company also records a corresponding asset which is amortized over the life of the project.


Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, accordingasset. Subsequent to the usual industry standards forinitial measurement of the stageasset retirement obligation, the obligation is adjusted at the end of explorationeach period to reflect the passage of such properties, these procedures do not guaranteetime (accretion expense) and changes in the Company’s title.  Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.   estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation (asset retirement cost).


Basic and Diluted Loss Per Shareper share


The Company computes netBasic loss per share in accordance with FASB Accounting Standard Codification 260, "Earnings Per Share".  Basic loss percommon share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares





F-9



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 31, 2009



Note 2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)


Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share – (cont’d)


outstanding duringyear. To calculate diluted loss per share, the year including stock options, usingCompany uses the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method.  In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the year is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants.  Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti dilutive.converted method.


Income TaxesFinancial instruments


The Company follows FASB Accounting Standards Codification 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” which requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and loss carryforwards and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities and measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.


Environmental costs


Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.  Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed.  Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the cost can be reasonably estimated.  Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with the earlier of:


i)

Completion of a feasibility study; or

ii)

The Company’s commitment to a plan of action based on the then known facts.


Financial Instruments


The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments consistingconsist of cash, and cash equivalents,receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and related party payable, approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturity of such instruments.  Unless otherwise noted, itrelated parties. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from its financial instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments.instruments approximate their carrying values unless otherwise noted.

 F-23

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

3.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d…)


Fair value of financial assets and liabilities

Fair Value Measurements


The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on US GAAP guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

Effective May 1, 2008,

The Company classifies financial assets and liabilities as held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables or other financial liabilities depending on their nature. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized at fair value on their initial recognition, except for those arising from certain related party transactions which are accounted for at the transferor’s carrying amount or exchange amount.

Financial assets and liabilities classified as held-for-trading are measured at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in net income. Financial assets classified as held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and financial liabilities other than those classified as held-for-trading are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method of amortization. Financial assets classified as available-for-sale are measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses being recognized as other comprehensive income until realized, or if an unrealized loss is considered other than temporary, the unrealized loss is recorded in income.

The following indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, 'Fair Value Measurements,' for allutilizes to determine the fair value of financial instruments and non-financial instruments accounted





F-10



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 31, 2009



Note 2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)


Fair Value Measurements – (cont’d)


 forassets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be used to classify the source of information used in fair value measurement and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. It does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value.


SFAS 157 established market and observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical transaction in the absence of market inputs. The valuation techniques required by SFAS 57 are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:


Level 1 - Quoted– Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical asset or liabilities.


assets and liabilities;

Level 2 - Observable inputs– Inputs other than quoted prices included in that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and

Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets3 – Inputs that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated bybased on observable market data.


Level 3 - Unobservable inputsFinancial instruments, including loan from related parties, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified as other financial liabilities and are carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short term nature of these instruments.

Concentration of credit risk

The financial instrument which potentially subjects the Company to concentration of credit risk is cash. The Company maintains cash in bank accounts that, are supported by little or no market activityat times, may exceed federally insured limits. As of July 31, 2017 and that are2016, the Company has not exceeded the federally insured limit. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant torisks on its cash in bank accounts.

Stock-based compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation under the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Under the fair value recognition provisions, stock-based compensation expense is measured at the fair value of the assetsconsideration received, or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.


In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market That Is Not Active” (FSP 157-3), which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 when the market for a financial asset is inactive. Specifically, FSP 157-3 clarifies how (1) management’s internal assumptions should be considered in measuring fair value when observable data are not present, (2) observable market information fromof the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measured. Grant date for all stock-based awards to employees and directors and is recognized as an inactive market should be taken into account, and (3)expense over the use of broker quotes or pricing services should be considered in assessingrequisite service period, which is generally the relevance of observable and unobservable datavesting period. The Black-Scholes option valuation model is used to measurecalculate fair value. The guidance in FSP 157-3 became effective immediately.

 F-24

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

3.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d…)


Stock-based compensation(cont’d…)

Derivative Instruments


The Company accounts for derivativestock compensation arrangements with non-employees in accordance with ASC 718 which requires that such equity instruments according to FASB Accounting Standard Codification 815.  These standards establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities.




F-11



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 31, 2009


Note 2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)


Derivative Instruments– (cont’d)


If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognitionrecorded at their fair value on the hedging derivative withmeasurement date. The measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the recognition of (i)underlying equity instruments vest. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges are amortized over the changes investing period on a straight-line basis. For stock options granted to employees, directors, and non-employees, the fair value of the hedgedstock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset orand liability thatmethod, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the hedged riskfinancial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or (ii)settled. Under the earningsasset and liability method the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or losschange in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of change.  The Company hasthe deferred tax asset will not entered into derivatives contracts to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes.be recognized.


Cash and Currency RisksForeign exchange


The functional currency of the Company incurs expenditures inand its subsidiary is the Canadian and U.S. dollars. Consequently, somedollar. Any monetary assets and liabilities that are exposed toin a currency other than the Canadian dollar foreign currency fluctuations.  As at July 31, 2009, there were no amounts denominated in Canadian dollars included in the financial statements. The Company has cash balances at well-known financial institutions.  Balances in U.S. dollars at Canadian institutions are not protected by insurance and are therefore subject to deposit risk.  As at July 31, 2009 all cash and equivalents represented cash at Canadian financial institutions.


Foreign Currency Translations


The Company's functional currency is US dollars. Foreign currency balances are translated into US dollars as follows:


Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary assets are translated at the rate of exchangeprevailing at year end. Revenue and expenses in a foreign currency are translated at rates that approximate those in effect at their acquisition, unless such assets are carried at market or nominal value, in which case they are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Foreign exchange gainstime of translation. Gains and losses in the periodfrom translation of foreign currency transactions into Canadian dollars are included in current results of operations.


Recent Accounting PronouncementsRecently adopted and recently issued accounting standards


In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”. This ASU eliminates the current requirement to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent amounts in a classified balance sheet and replaces it with a noncurrent classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopts newis currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities”. This ASU amendment addresses aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. It affects investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value, and simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without a readily determinable fair value by requiring a qualitative assessment. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard.

Other than the above, the Company has determined that other significant newly issued accounting pronouncements relating to generally accepted accounting principlesare either not applicable to the Company as they are issued, which may be in advance of their effective date.  Management does not believeCompany’s business or that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have ano material effect is expected on the accompanying financial statements.statements as a result of future adoption.

 F-25

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

4.MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS


The Company’s mineral properties balance consists of:

Note 3

       
  July 31, 2017  July 31, 2016 
       
Klondike, British Columbia $-  $513,031 
Indata, British Columbia  -   50,000 
Idaho-Maryland, California  3,789,854   - 
         
Total $3,789,854  $563,031 

Mineral Property and Subsequent EventTitle to mineral properties


Title to mineral properties involves certain inherent risks due to the difficulties of determining the validity of certain mineral titles as well as the potential for problems arising from the frequently ambiguous conveying history characteristic of many mineral properties. As at July 31, 2017, the Company holds title to the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine Property.

Indata, British Columbia

On AprilMay 18, 2007,2015, the Company purchasedentered into an option agreement with Eastfield Resources Ltd., (“Eastfield”), pursuant to which Eastfield granted the Company the exclusive and irrevocable right to acquire up to a mineral claim75% interest in and to certain claims in the ProvinceIndata property located in the Omineca Mining Division in British Columbia, Canada. In order to earn the initial 60% interest, the Company is required to pay Eastfield an aggregate of $350,000 ($50,000 paid to date) in cash and incur a minimum of $2,000,000 in aggregate exploration expenditures on the property by April 3, 2019. In order to earn the additional 15% interest, the Company is required to pay Eastfield $100,000 cash within 90 days of earning the 60% interest and incur a further $500,000 in aggregate annual exploration expenditures on the property until such time as the Company is able to complete a feasibility study on the property. As at July 31, 2017, the Company has incurred cumulative exploration expenditures of $4,035 on the Indata property. During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company terminated its option agreement with Eastfield; accordingly, the Company has written off $50,000 in acquisition costs in relation to the Indata property as at July 31, 2017.

Klondike, British Columbia

On May 26, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Klondike Gold Corp. (“Klondike”) regarding the purchase of a portfolio of seven gold and base metal properties in southeast British Columbia. Under the agreement, within 60 days of signing, the Company paid Klondike $50,000 in cash, issued 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $240,000, and issued 1,500,000 warrants valued at $223,031 (discount rate – 0.49%, volatility – 200.64%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable at $0.227 per share until July 13, 2018. On the one year anniversary of the first closing, the Company will pay Klondike $150,000 in cash, issue 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and issue 1,000,000 warrants. Klondike will retain a 2% net smelter return royalty (“NSR”) and the Company will have the right to purchase 50% of the NSR for $1,000,000 at any time after the first closing. Each of the warrants is exercisable for a period of two years into one share of the Company’s common stock at a price that is a 20% premium to the 10-day volume-weighted average price of the stock on the CSE immediately prior to the date of issuance. As at July 31, 2017, the Company has incurred cumulative exploration expenditures of $10,408 on the Klondike properties. During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company terminated the purchase agreement with Klondike and paid a settlement of $100,000 to Klondike; accordingly the Company has written off $513,031 in acquisition costs in relation to the Klondike properties as at July 31, 2017.

 F-26

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

4.MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS(cont’d…)

Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine Property, California

On August 30, 2016, the Company entered into an option agreement with three parties to purchase a 100% interest in and to the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property located near Grass Valley, California, United States; pursuant to the option agreement, in order to exercise the option, the Company must pay US$2,000,000 by November 30, 2016. Upon execution of the option agreement, the Company paid the vendors a non-refundable cash deposit in the amount of $32,758 (US$25,000), which will be credited against the purchase price of US$2,000,000 upon exercise of the option. On November 30, 2016, the Company negotiated an extension of the closing date of the option agreement to December 26, 2016, in return for a cash payment of $32,758 (US$25,000), which will be credited against the purchase price of US$2,000,000 upon exercise of the option. On December 28, 2016, the Company negotiated a further no-cost extension of the closing date of the option agreement to April 30, 2017. On January 25, 2017, the Company exercised the option by paying $2,588,625 (US$1,950,000), and acquired a 100% interest in the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property. In connection with the option agreement, the Company agreed to pay a cash commission of $184,000 (US$140,000) equal to 7 per cent of the purchase price of US$2,000,000; the commission was settled on January 25, 2017 through the issuance of 920,000 units valued at $0.20 per unit (Note 7). The Company also incurred additional transaction costs of $144,391, which have been included the carrying value of the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine.

On January 6, 2017, the Company entered into an option agreement with Sierra Pacific Industries Inc. (“Sierra”) to purchase a 100% interest in and to certain surface rights totalling approximately 82 acres located near Grass Valley, California, United States, contiguous to the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property acquired by the Company on January 25, 2017. Pursuant to the option agreement, in order to exercise the option, the Company must pay US$1,900,000 by March 31, 2017. Upon execution of the option agreement, the Company paid the vendors a non-refundable cash deposit in the amount of $132,732 (US$100,000), which will be credited against the purchase price of US$1,900,000 upon exercise of the option. On April 3, 2017, the Company negotiated an extension of the closing date of the option agreement to June 30, 2017, in return for a cash payment of $268,000 (US$200,000), at which time a payment of US$1,600,000 is due in order to exercise the option. On June 7, 2017, the Company negotiated an extension of the closing date of the option agreement to September 30, 2017, in return for a cash payment of $406,590 (US$300,000), at which time a payment of US$1,300,000 is due in order to exercise the option.

As at July 31, 2017, the Company has incurred cumulative property investigation costs of $55,253 and cumulative exploration expenditures of $375,980 on the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property as follows:

  Year ended
July 31, 2017
 
    
Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine expenditures:    
Consulting $287,411 
Exploration  54,753 
Rent  10,968 
Supplies  4,020 
Sampling  8,623 
Travel  10,205 
     
Total $375,980 

 F-27

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

5.CONTINGENCY

During the year ended July 31, 2014, the Company entered into a binding letter of intent (“LOI”) with Wundr Software Inc. (“Wundr”). Under the terms of the LOI, the Company would acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Wundr. Due to unforeseen circumstances, the Company did not complete the transactions contemplated in the LOI, which the Company announced had expired on January 10, 2014.

On September 17, 2014, the Company learned that it was the subject, along with a number of additional defendants, of a notice of civil claim (the “Claim”) filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia for $7,500.  In 2008,by Wundr, under which Wundr is seeking general damages from the Company conductedas well as damages for conspiracy to cause economic harm.  None of the allegations contained in the Claim have been proven in court. Management has determined that the probability of the Claim resulting in an unfavourable outcome and financial loss to the Company is unlikely.

6.BAD DEBT EXPENSE

During the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company advanced to Skanderbeg Capital Partners Inc. a work programtotal of $7,126, which had been recorded in prepaid expenses to be applied to future rent expense (Note 7). As the Company moved its premises during the year ended July 31, 2017, management has assessed the recoverability of the amount and recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,126 for the year ended July 31, 2016.

7.PROMISSORY NOTES PAYABLE

During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company issued promissory notes totalling $5,000$220,000, accruing interest in advance at 10% every three months, maturing on June 29, 2017. Subsequently, the Company and one promissory note holder agreed to keepreduce the claims in good standing.  In 2009,interest rate to 7.2% and make an early repayment of principal of $100,000 and accrued interest of $7,200. The remaining principal of $120,000 and accrued interest of $12,000 was also repaid during the claim lapsed, butyear ended July 31, 2017.



8.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Key management personnel consist of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the directors of the Company. The remuneration of the key management personnel is as follows:

a)Salaries of $135,000 (2016 - $5,000) to the CEO of the Company;

b)Consulting fees of $32,119 (2016 - $30,000) to the former CEO of the Company;

c)Consulting fees of $52,429 (2016 - $18,000) to the CFO of the Company, and consulting fees of $11,476 (2016 - $4,946) to a company in which the CFO holds a 50% interest;

d)Consulting fees of $149,333 (2016 - $Nil) to a company controlled by a former director of the Company, and consulting fees of $11,476 (2016 - $4,946) to a company in which the former director holds a 50% interest; and

e)Share-based payments of $885,375 (2016 - $246,004) to the CEO and directors of the Company.

As at July 31, 2017, the Company has recorded loans from related parties of $38,079 (US$30,500) (2016 - $43,214 or US$33,099) representing advances made by a director and a former director and officer. The advances are due on demand without interest.

 F-28


RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

8.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS(cont’d…)


F-12



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at July 31, 2009



Note 3

Mineral Property2017, included in due to related parties is $20,385 (2016 - $25,494) in accounts and Subsequent Event – (cont’d)


subsequent to the year end, was reinstated and is in good standing until October 6, 2010.  


Note 4

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities


Accountsadvances payable and accrued liabilities represent administrativeto current and former officers and companies controlled by directors and officers of the Company.

Included in general and administration expenses for the year ended July 31, 2017 is rent of $Nil (2016 - $7,128) paid to Skanderbeg Capital Partners Inc., a company that previously advised the Company’s management and professionalperformed promotional work for the Company.

9.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL

Issued Capital Stock

On October 28, 2015, pursuant to a share surrender and cancellation agreement, the Company cancelled 13,000,186 shares of common stock surrendered to the Company, originally issued through the debt conversion agreements on February 11, 2015 and March 31, 2015.

On January 29, 2016, the Company completed an initial public offering in Canada, issuing an aggregate of 6,050,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share for gross proceeds of $605,000. In connection with the offering, the Company paid a cash commission of $48,400 and issued 484,000 finders’ warrants valued at $42,248 (discount rate – 0.43%, volatility – 215.3%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable at $0.10 per share for period of 24 months. The Company also paid the agenta corporate finance fee of $25,000 and incurred other share issuance costs of $53,667.

On June 3, 2016, the Company issued 19,250 shares of common stock upon the exercise of finders’ warrants at a price of $0.10 per share.

On July 18, 2016, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.16 per share to Klondike pursuant to the Klondike properties purchase agreement (Note 4).

On August 1, 2016, the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.15 per share to the Company’s CEO as compensation. The shares were valued at $60,000 on issuance and were recognized as consulting expense.

On November 1, 2016 and November 7, 2016, the Company issued a total of272,080 shares of common stock upon the exercise of finders’ warrants at a price of $0.10 per share.

On January 25, 2017, the Company issued 920,000 units valued at $0.20 per unit to an individual pursuant to a debt conversion by the individual in the amount of $184,000 (US$140,000), representing a cash commission equal to seven per cent of the US$2,000,000 purchase price of the Idaho-Maryland property (Note 4).Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

 F-29

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL (cont’d…)

Private Placements

On December 23, 2016, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 21,044,500 units at a price of $0.20 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,208,900. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees payableof $218,410, other share issuance costs of $15,723, and accrued.issued a total of 1,104,300 finders’ warrants valued at $191,724 (discount rate – 0.76%, volatility – 179.53%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.


NoteOn January 24, 2017, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 1,340,000 units at a price of $0.20 per unit for gross proceeds of $268,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $5,220 and issued a total of 26,100 finders’ warrants valued at $5,919 (discount rate – 0.76%, volatility – 175.85%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On February 6, 2017, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 455,000 units at a price of $0.25 per unit for gross proceeds of $113,750. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $2,625 and issued a total of 10,500 finders’ warrants valued at $2,657 (discount rate – 0.70%, volatility – 175.86%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

On May 5, 2017, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 9,009,814 units at a price of $0.23 per unit for gross proceeds of $2,072,257. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $100,392 and issued a total of 436,488 finders’ warrants valued at $92,991 (discount rate – 0.67%, volatility – 170.28%, expected life – 2 years, dividend yield – 0%), exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

Due to Related Party


Stock Options

During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company granted:

a)a total of 2,729,142 stock options to the Company’s CEO, exercisable at a weighted average price of $0.23 per share for a period of five years;

b)500,000 incentive stock options to an investor relations consultant, each option exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.33 until February 7, 2020;

c)500,000 stock options to a director of the Company, exercisable at a price of $0.27 per share until April 3, 2022; and

d)900,000 stock options to two directors of the Company, exercisable at a price of $0.28 per share until April 20, 2020.

 F-30

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL (cont’d…)

Stock Options(cont’d…)

The account represents advances made by a major shareholder and director.  There is no interest or stated terms of repayment.following incentive stock options were outstanding at July 31, 2017:


 Number
of Shares
  Exercise
Price
  Expiry Date
        
  1,100,000  $0.15  March 22, 2021
  586,600   0.20  August 8, 2021
  2,142,542   0.24  December 27, 2021
  500,000   0.33  February 7, 2020
  500,000   0.27  April 3, 2022
  900,000   0.28  April 30, 2020
  5,729,142   0.24   
          

Note 6Stock option transactions are summarized as follows:

Income Taxes

  Number of Options  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
       
Balance, July 31, 2015  -  $- 
Options granted  2,700,000   0.15 
         
Balance, July 31, 2016  2,700,000  $0.15 
Options granted  4,629,142   0.26 
Options exercised  (400,000)  (0.15)
Options expired/forfeited  (1,200,000)  (0.15)
         
Balance outstanding and exercisable, July 31, 2017  5,729,142  $0.24 


Warrants

The impactfollowing warrants were outstanding at July 31, 2017:

 Number
of Warrants
  Exercise
Price
  Expiry Date
        
  192,670  $0.10  January 29, 2018
  1,500,000   0.227  July 13, 2018
  22,148,800   0.40  December 23, 2018
  2,286,100   0.40  January 24, 2019
  465,500   0.40  February 6, 2019
  9,446,302   0.40  May 5, 2019
  36,039,372  $0.39   
          

 F-31

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL (cont’d…)

Warrants(cont’d…)

Warrant transactions are summarized as follows:

  Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
       
Balance, July 31, 2015  -  $- 
Warrants issued  1,984,000   0.20 
Warrants exercised  (19,250)  (0.10)
         
Balance, July 31, 2016  1,964,750  $0.20 
Warrants issued  34,346,702   0.40 
Warrants exercised  (272,080)  (0.10)
         
Balance outstanding, July 31, 2017  36,039,372  $0.39 

During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company issued a total of differences between1,577,388 (2016 – 484,000) finders’ warrants with a weighted average fair value of $0.19 (2016 - $0.09) per warrant.

The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model valuation of finders’ warrants issued during the year:

       
  2017  2016 
       
Risk-free interest rate  0.73%  0.43%
Expected life of warrants  2.0 years   2.0 years 
Expected annualized volatility  176.89%  215.30%
Dividend  Nil   Nil 
Forfeiture rate  0%  0%

Share-Based Payments

The Company has a stock option plan under which it is authorized to grant options to executive officers and directors, employees and consultants enabling them to acquire up to 10% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Under the plan the exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s reportedstock, less any applicable discount, as calculated on the date of grant. The options can be granted for a maximum term of 5 years with vesting determined by the board of directors.

During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company granted 4,629,142 (2016 – 2,700,000) stock options with a weighted average fair value of $0.18 (2016 - $0.14). The Company recognized share-based payments expense of $1,010,064 (2016 - $369,006).

 F-32

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9.CAPITAL STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL (cont’d…)

Share-Based Payments (cont’d…)

The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model valuation of stock options granted during the year:

       
  2017  2016 
       
Risk-free interest rate  0.82%  0.64%
Expected life of options  3.07 years   5.00 years 
Expected annualized volatility  128.23%  151.50%
Dividend  -   - 
Forfeiture rate  -   - 

10.INCOME TAXES

As of July 31, 2017, the Company had no accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The income tax provision on operating income and the benefit that would otherwise resultdiffers from the applicationamount of statutoryincome tax determined by applying the U.S. federal and state income tax rates of 34% to pre-tax income from continuing operations for the years ended July 31, 2017 and 2016 is noted below. As management cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset has been recorded.


Balance, July 31

 

2009

2008

Income tax recovery at statutory rate – 30.2.0% (32.5%  in 2008)

 


 $    3,489


$   7,754

Temporary differences

 

 7

8

Income tax rate change

 

 (747)

(137)

Valuation allowance

 

 (2,749)

(7,625)


Net income tax benefit

 


$           -  


$          -


The net deferred tax assetA reconciliation of income taxes (recovery) at statutory rates with the reported taxes is as follows:


As at July 31

 

2009

2008

Net operating loss carried forward of $44,041 ($32,467  in 2008)

 

 

 $   13,300

 

 $ 10,552

Valuation allowance

 

 (13,300)

 (10,552)


Net income tax benefit

 


$             -  


$          -

       
  2017  2016 
Loss before income taxes $(4,190,955) $(633,466)
         
Expected income tax (recovery) at statutory tax rates $(1,669,000) $(215,000)
Change in statutory, foreign tax, foreign exchange rates and other  (181,000)  - 
Permanent differences  496,000   186,000 
Valuation allowance  1,354,000   29,000 
         
Income tax recovery $-  $- 


The valuation allowance increased $2,749 in 2009 and $7,625 in 2008.


Under normal circumstances the ability to apply theSignificant components of deferred tax loss of $44,041 will expire between 2027 and 2029.






F-13



ATLANTIC RESOURCES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 31, 2009



Note 7

Capital Stock


On March 12, 2007, the Company issued 3,000,000 common shares for $3,000 in cash to the sole director.


On March 14, 2007, the Company issued 1,200,000 common shares for $1,200 in cash.


On April 26, 2007, the Company issued 500,000 common shares for $25,000 in cash.


There are no shares subject to options, warrants or other agreements as at July 31, 2009.







18




Plan Of Operations


As at July 31, 2009, we had a cash balance of $1,539.  Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is to complete the recommended phase two exploration programsassets (liabilities) that have not been included on the Vic Vein Mining Claim consisting of a geophysical survey and follow-up mapping. We carried out the first phase of the recommended exploration program in the summer of 2008 at a cost of $5,000.  We anticipate that the second phase of the recommended exploration programs will cost approximately $25,000, which is budgetedCompany’s balance sheet are as follows:


       
  2017  2016 
       
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):        
Mineral properties $58,000  $(72,000)
Net operating loss carry-forwards  1,857,000   632,000 
         
Unrecognized deferred tax assets $1,915,000  $560,000 

 F-33

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

Geophysical survey

10.

$18,500

Follow-up Mapping

$  2,500

Report writing/consulting

$  2,500

Operating Supplies

$  1,500

Total Phase II

$25,000


After the completion of the phase two exploration program, we will have our consulting geologist prepare a report discussing the results and conclusions of the first two phases of exploration. We will also ask her to provide us with a recommendation for additional exploration work on the Vic Vein Mining claim, which will include a proposed budget.


As well, we anticipate spending an additional $15,000 on administrative fees, including fees payable in connection with reporting obligations. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are therefore expected to be approximately $40,000.


We do not have sufficient funds to cover the anticipated exploration expenses associated with the second phase of the exploration program, so we will require additional funding in order to proceed with additional exploration on the Vic Vein claim and to cover administrative expenses.  We anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock or from director loans. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing or loans.


If we are not successful in raising additional financing, we anticipate that we will not be able to proceed with our business plan.  In such a case, we may decide to discontinue our current business plan and seek other business opportunities in the resource sector.  Any business opportunity would require our management to perform diligence on possible acquisition of additional resource properties. Such due diligence would likely include purchase investigation costs, such as professional fees by consulting geologists, preparation of geological reports on the properties, conducting title searches and travel costs for site visits.  


Our current cash on hand will not be sufficient to acquire any resource property and additional funds will be required to close any possible acquisition.  As a reporting company we will need to maintain our periodic filings with the appropriate regulatory authorities and will incur legal and accounting costs.  If no other such opportunities are available and we cannot raise additional capital to sustain minimum operations, we may be forced to discontinue business.  We do not have any specific alternative business opportunities in mind and have not planned for any such contingency.


Based on the nature of our business, we anticipate incurring operating losses in the foreseeable future.  We base this expectation, in part, on the fact that very few mineral claims in the exploration stage ultimately develop into producing, profitable mines.  Our future financial results are also uncertain due to a number of factors, some of which are outside our control.  These factors include the following:


?

our ability to raise additional funding;


?

the market price for minerals that may be found on the Vic Vein mineral claim;


?

the results of our proposed exploration programs on the mineral property; and





19




?

our ability to find joint venture partners for the development of our property interests


We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue exploration activities.  For these reasons our auditors believe that there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.


Results of Operations


We have had no operating revenues since our inception on February 9, 2007 through July 31, 2009, and have incurred operating expenses in the amount of $44,468 for the same period.  Our activities have been financed from the proceeds of share subscriptions and director loans.


We do not anticipate earning revenues unless we enter into commercial production on the Vic Vein claim, which is doubtful.  We have not commenced the exploration stage of our business and can provide no assurance that we will discover economic mineralization on the Vic Vein claim, or if such minerals are discovered, that we will enter into commercial production.


For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009, general and administrative expenses were $5,328 and professional fees were $6,224.  For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008, general and administrative expenses were $5,491, professional fees were $13,366 and we incurred $5,000 in geological, mineral and prospect costs.


During our fiscal year ended July 31, 2009, we incurred a net loss of $(11,552), which resulted in an accumulated deficit of $(44,468).


Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  We have expensed all development costs related to our establishment.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


We had cash of $1,539 as of July 31, 2009, compared to a cash position of $4,664 at July 31, 2008.  Since inception through to and including July 31, 2009, we have raised $29,200 through private placements of our common shares.


We expect to run at a loss for at least the next twelve months. We have no agreements for additional financing and cannot provide any assurance that additional funding will be available to finance our operations on acceptable terms in order to enable us to complete our plan of operations.  There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve further sales of our common stock or any other form of additional financing.  If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we will not be able to continue our exploration of our mineral claim and our venture will fail.


Off-balance sheet arrangements


We have no off-balance sheet arrangements including arrangements that would affect our liquidity, capital resources, market risk support and credit risk support or other benefits.


We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue exploration activities.  For these reasons our auditors believe that there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.


Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and

Financial Disclosure


We have had no changes in or disagreements with our accountants.






20



Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters And Control Persons


Our executive officers and directors and their age as of the date of this prospectus is as follows:


Directors:


Name of Director

Age

Raffi Khorchidian

43

INCOME TAXES(cont’d…)

 




Executive Officers:


Name of Officer

Age

Office

Raffi Khorchidian

43

President and Chief Executive Officer


Biographical Information


Set forth below is a brief descriptionThe Company has approximately $4,660,000 in net operating losses which may be carried forward and applied against taxable income in future years. Net operating loss carry-forwards, if not utilized, start to expire in 2033. The benefits of the backgroundthese losses and business experience of our executive officer and director for the past five years.


Mr. Raffi Khorchidianhas acted as our president, chief executive officer and as a director since our incorporation on February 9, 2007.  Mr. Khorchidian hasother tax assets have not been the owner and founder, sole director and shareholder of Graffico. His positions with Graffico have been his principal occupation over the past 15 years. Raffi Khorchidian has over 25 years of experiencerecognized in the print industry in all aspects of print sales, production and marketing.these financial statements.

 

Mr. Khorchidian does not have any professional training or technical credentials in the exploration, developmentTax attributes are subject to review and operation of mines.


Mr.Khorchidian intends to devote approximately 30% of his business time to our affairs.


Term of Office


Our director is appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws.  Our officers are appointedpotential adjustments by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.


Significant Employees


We have no significant employees other than the officers and directors described above.


Stock Option Grants


We have not granted any stock options to the executive officers since our inception.


Consulting Agreements


We do not have any employment or consulting agreement with our directors or officers.  We do not pay Mr. Raffi Khorchidian any amount for acting as director of the Company.







21



Executive Compensation


Summary Compensation Table


The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officers by any person for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the fiscal period from our inception on February 9, 2007 to April 30, 2009 and the subsequent period to the date of this prospectus.


Annual Compensation




Name



Title



Year



Salary



Bonus


Other Comp.

Restr Stock Awarded

Options/SARS (#)

LTP payouts ($)

Raffi

Khorchidian

President CEO, Secretary, Treasurer & Director

2009

2008

2007

$0

$0

$0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

$0

$0

$0



Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management


The following table provides the names and addresses of each person known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock as of the date of this prospectus, and by the officers and directors, individually and as a group.  Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.



Title of Class


Name of beneficial owner

Amount of beneficial ownership


Percent of class


Common stock


Raffi Khorchidian

 


3,000,000


63.83%

 

 

 

 

Common stock

All officers and directors as a group that consists of one person

3,000,000

63.83%

 

 

 

 


The percent of class is based on 4,700,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.


Certain Relationships And Related Transactions


None of the following parties has, since our date of incorporation, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction with us or in any presently proposed transaction that has or will materially affect us:


*

Any of our directors or officers;

*

Any person proposed as a nominee for election as a director;

*

Any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock;

*

Our promoter, Raffi Khorchidian;

*

Any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons.






22



Disclosure Of Commission Position Of Indemnification For Securities Act Liabilities


Our directors and officers are indemnified as provided by the Nevada Revised Statutes and our Bylaws. These provisions provide that we shall indemnify a director or former director against all expenses incurred by him by reason of him acting in that position.  The director may also cause us to indemnify an officer, employee or agent in the same fashion.


We have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our legal counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit the question of whether such indemnification is against public policy to a court of appropriate jurisdiction.  We will then be governed by the court's decision.


Until ______________, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus.  This is in addition to the dealer's obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.





23



Part II


Information Not Required In The Prospectus


Other Expenses Of Issuance And Distribution


The estimated costs of this offering are as follows:


Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee

$      9.10

Transfer Agent fees

$ 1,000.00

Accounting and auditing fees and expenses

$ 6,500.00

Legal fees and expenses                                     

$ 1,500.00

Edgar filing fees                                           

$ 1,000.00

Total

$10,009.14


All amounts are estimates other than the Commission's registration fee.


We are paying all expenses of the offering listed above.  No portion of these expenses will be borne by the selling shareholders.  The selling shareholders, however, will pay any other expenses incurred in selling their common stock, including any brokerage commissions or costs of sale.


Indemnification Of Directors And Officers


Our officers and directors are indemnified as provided by the Nevada Revised Statutes (the “NRS”) and our bylaws.


Under the NRS, director immunity from liability to a company or its shareholders for monetary liabilities applies automatically unless it is specifically limited by a company's articles of incorporation that is not the case with our articles of incorporation. Excepted from that immunity are:


(1)

a willful failure to deal fairly with the company or its shareholders in connection with a matter in which the director has a material conflict of interest;


(2)

a violation of criminal law (unless the director had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was lawful or no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful);


(3)

a transaction from which the director derived an improper personal profit; and


(4)

willful misconduct.


Our bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent not prohibited by Nevada law; provided, however, that we may modify the extent of such indemnification by individual contracts with our directors and officers; and, provided, further, that we shall not be required to indemnify any director or officer in connection with any proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless:


(1)

such indemnification is expressly required to be made by law;


(2)

the proceeding was authorized by our Board of Directors;


(3)

such indemnification is provided by us, in our sole discretion, pursuant to the powers vested us under Nevada law; or


(4)

such indemnification is required to be made pursuant to the bylaws.


Our bylaws provide that we will advance all expenses incurred to any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was our director or officer, or is or was serving at our request as a director or executive officer of another company,





24



partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, prior to the final disposition of the proceeding, promptly following request.  This advanced of expenses is to be made upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such person to repay said amounts should it be ultimately determined that the person was not entitled to be indemnified under our bylaws or otherwise.


Our bylaws also provide that no advance shall be made by us to any officer in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, if a determination is reasonably and promptly made: (a) by the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the proceeding; or (b) if such quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable, a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, that the facts known to the decision- making party at the time such determination is made demonstrate clearly and convincingly that such person acted in bad faith or in a manner that such person did not believe to be in or not opposed to our best interests.


Recent Sales Of Unregistered Securities


We completed an offering of 3,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.001 per share to our president, Raffi Khorchidian, on March 12, 2007.  The total amount received from this offering was $3,000.  These shares were issued pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act.  


We completed an offering of 1,200,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.001 per share to a total of six purchasers on March 14, 2007.  The total amount received from this offering was $1,200.  These shares were issued pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act.  The purchasers in this offering were as follows:  


Name of Subscriber

Number of Shares

Ophelia Sahakian  

200,000

Levon Khorchidian

200,000

Vartouhy Khorchidian

200,000

Patricia Comeau

200,000

Alan Sahakian

200,000

Taline Giragosian

200,000



We completed an offering of 500,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.05 per share to a total of 25 purchasers on April 26, 2007.  The total amount received from this offering was $25,000.  We completed this offering pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act.  The purchasers in this offering were as follows:tax authorities.

 

Name of Subscriber

11.

Number of Shares

Rob Oslic

20,000

Henry Peters

20,000

Jack Khorchidian

20,000

Laura Oslic

20,000

Jim Platis

20,000

Loutfig Demirjian

20,000

Raffi Donabedian

20,000

Garine Demirjian

20,000

Patty Yeterian

20,000

Jean Jacques Donabedian

20,000

Zare Giragosian

20,000

Dick Lau

20,000

Bobbie Brockelmann

20,000

Sossi Dakessian

20,000

Vahik Sahakian

20,000

Remon Jubran

20,000

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS





25During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company:






a)Issued 1,577,388 finders’ warrants valued at $241,942 (Note 9);

b)Issued 920,000 units, each unit comprising one share of common stock and one share purchase warrant, valued at $184,000 pursuant to a debt conversion in relation to mineral property acquisition (Note 9); and

c)Accrued $103,092 in share issuance costs through accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

During the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company:

a)Issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $0.16 per share, valued at $240,000 for mineral properties (Note 4);

b)Issued 484,000 finders’ warrants valued at $42,248 (Note 9);

c)Issued 1,500,000 warrants valued at $223,031 for mineral properties (Note 4);

d)Cancelled 13,000,186 shares of common stock valued at $13,000, pursuant to a share surrender and cancellation agreement (Note 8); and

e)Accrued $2,664 in share issuance costs through accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

12.SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company has two reportable segments, being the acquisition of exploration and evaluation assets located in British Columbia, Canada, and California, United States.

13.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to July 31, 2017, the Company:

a)Issued 417,184 units valued at $0.23 per unit to a third party pursuant to a debt conversion by the third party in the amount of $95,952, representing finders fees payable on the private placement which closed May 5, 2017.Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.40 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

 F-34

RISE GOLD CORP. (FORMERLY RISE RESOURCES INC.)

John Arabatlian

20,000

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Tamar Demirdjian

20,000

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Marcello Leone

20,000

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2017

Carla Leone

20,000

Kevin White

20,000

Sean Comeau

20,000

Rob Harris

20,000

Randall Andrus

20,000

Aghavne Sahakian

20,000

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


13.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS(cont’d…)

b)Negotiated a third extension of the closing date of the option agreement with Sierra (Note 4) to June 30, 2018 in return for cash payments as follows: US$300,000 by September 30, 2017 (paid), US$300,000 by December 30, 2017, US$300,000 by March 30, 2018, and a final payment of US$400,000 by June 30, 2018, which will be credited against the remaining purchase price of US$1,300,000.

c)Completed a non-brokered private placement, issuing an aggregate of 7,077,140 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $1,061,571. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid finders fees of $540 and issued a total of 3,600, exercisable into one share of common stock at a price of $0.25 for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

 F-35

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

The following table lists the costs and expenses for which we have assumed sole responsibility and that we will pay in connection with the offering of securities covered by this prospectus, other than any sales commissions or discounts. All amounts are estimates except for the SEC registration fee.

  Amount
(US$)
 
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee $1,182.75 
Accounting fees and expenses  2,500 
Legal fees and expenses  20,000 
Printing fees and expenses  2,000 
Transfer agent and registrar fees and expenses  2,500 
Miscellaneous expenses  1,000 
Total $29,182.75 

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

Nevada corporation law provides in Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) 78.7502 that: 

a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if (a) the person is not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138, or (b) the person acted in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful;

a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys’ fees actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if (a) the person is not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138, or (b) the person acted in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matter as to which such a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper; and

 II-1

to the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in the two paragraphs above, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, the corporation shall indemnify him or her against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the defense.

NRS 78.751 provides that we may make any discretionary indemnification pursuant to NRS 78.7502 only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances. The determination must be made: 

by our stockholders;

by our board of directors by majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding;

if a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding so orders, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion;

if a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding cannot be obtained, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or

by court order.

The indemnification pursuant to NRX 78.7502 and advancement of expenses authorized in or ordered by a court pursuant to NRS 78.751.2:

does not exclude any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under the articles of incorporation or any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, for either an action in the person’s official capacity or an action in another capacity while holding office, except that indemnification, unless ordered by a court pursuant to NRS 78.7501 or for the advancement of expenses made pursuant to NRS 78.751.2, may not be made to or on behalf of any director or officer if a final adjudication establishes that the director’s or officer’s acts or omissions involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law and was material to the cause of action; and

continues for a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and inures to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person.

Our bylaws provide that:

The directors of the Company shall cause the Company to indemnify a director or former director of the Company and the directors may cause the Company to indemnify a director or former director of a corporation of which the Company is or was a shareholder and the heirs and personal representatives of any such person against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, actually and reasonably incurred by him or her including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment in any criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which he or she is made a party by reason of his or her being or having been a director of the Company or a director of such corporation, including an action brought by the Company or corporation. Each director of the Company on being elected or appointed is deemed to have contracted with the Company on the terms of the foregoing indemnity.

The directors of the Company may cause the Company to indemnify an officer, employee or agent of the Company or of a corporation of which the Company is or was a shareholder (notwithstanding that he or she is also a director of the Company) and his or her heirs and personal representatives against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by him or her and resulting from his or her acting as an officer, employee or agent of the Company or the corporation. In addition, the Company shall indemnify the secretary or assistant secretary of the Company (if he or she is not a full time employee of the Company and

 II-2

notwithstanding that he or she is also a director of the Company) and his or her respective heirs and legal representatives against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by him or her and arising out of the functions assigned to the secretary by law or the articles of incorporation of the Company, and each secretary and assistant secretary, on being appointed is deemed to have contracted with the Company on the terms of the foregoing indemnity.

The directors of the Company may cause the Company to purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of a person who is or was serving as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company or as a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation of which the Company is or was a shareholder and his or her heirs or personal representatives against a liability incurred by him as a director, officer, employee or agent.

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

During the past three years, we have issued the following securities without registration under the Securities Act outside the United States pursuant to the exclusion from registration provided under Rule 903 of Regulation S Compliance


Each offer or sale was made in an offshore transaction;


Neither we, a distributor, any respective affiliates nor any person on behalfand inside the United States pursuant to the exemptions from registration provided by Rule 506 of anyRegulation D and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, in each case in reliance upon the representations received from the purchasers of those securities.

On January 29, 2016, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 6,050,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.10 per share in a Canadian public offering in exchange for gross proceeds of $605,000.  The shares were qualified for distribution in the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta pursuant to a final long form prospectus that was prepared and dated November 10, 2015. We entered into an agency agreement dated September 22, 2015 with one Canadian selling agent, pursuant to which we paid the agent a cash commission equal to 8% of the gross proceeds and issued the agent and one sub-agent an aggregate of 484,000 warrants, each of which was exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.10 per share for a period of 24 months. We issued the foregoing madeshares and warrants in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S.  Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the securities were sold in offshore transactions.  We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States;


Offering restrictions were, and are, implemented;


No offer orStates in connection with the sale was made to a U.S. person or for the account or benefit of a U.S. person;


Each purchaser of the securities, certifies that it wasand the investors were not a U.S. personpersons and wasdid not acquiringacquire the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person;person.


On March 23, 2016, we adopted an incentive stock option plan and granted an aggregate of 2,700,000 options to various of our directors and consultants.  Each purchaseroption vested immediately and is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share until March 22, 2021. Of the 2,700,000 options, we granted 900,000 to Fred Tejada, our then President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and member of our board of directors, 700,000 to Cale Thomas, our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and director, and 200,000 to Michael Evans, a then independent member of our board.  The remaining 900,000 options were granted to some of our consultants who were eligible to participate in our stock option plan. We granted these options in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S.  Our reliance on Rule 903 of Regulation S was based on the fact that the options were granted in offshore transactions, as defined in Rule 902(h) of Regulation S.  We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the grant of the options, and the grantees were not U.S. persons and did not acquire the options for the account or benefit of any U.S. person.

On May 26, 2016, we entered into a property purchase agreement with Klondike Gold Corp., a British Columbia company (“Klondike”), pursuant to which Klondike agreed to transfer to us 100% of its right, title and interest in and to certain mineral claims located in British Columbia, Canada (collectively, the “Properties”) in exchange for certain consideration, including shares of our Common Stock and warrants to purchase additional shares of Common Stock. In connection with this transaction, we issued to Klondike, on July 13, 2016, 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock and 1,500,000 common stock purchase warrants, each of which is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.227 per share for a period of 24 months. On July 17, 2017, we entered into a settlement agreement with Klondike that effectively terminated the purchase agreement respecting the Properties. We issued the shares and warrants to Klondike in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S.  Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the securities were sold in an offshore transaction.  We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the securities, agreedand Klondike was not a U.S. person and did not acquire the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person.

 II-3

On August 1, 2016, we issued 400,000 shares of Common Stock to resell such securities onlyour Chief Executive Officer, Benjamin Mossman, at a deemed price of $0.15 per share as a signing bonus pursuant to Mr. Mossman’s executive employment agreement.  On August 9, 2016, and pursuant to the same agreement, we issued Mr. Mossman incentive stock options to purchase 586,600 shares of Common Stock exercisable at a price of $0.20 per share until August 8, 2021. We issued these shares and granted the stock options to Mr. Mossman in accordancereliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S.  Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the shares were issued and the options were granted in offshore transactions. We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the provisionsissuance or the grant, and Mr. Mossman is not a U.S. person and did not acquire the shares and options for the account or benefit of any U.S. person. 

On December 23, 2016, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 21,044,500 units at a price of $0.20 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,208,900.  Each unit consisted of one share of our Common Stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 until December 23, 2018. In connection with the private placement, we paid eight finders a cash commission equal to either 2% or 6%, depending on the manner of introduction, of the gross proceeds raised from investors introduced to us by those finders, for a total of $221,610, and issued an aggregate of 1,104,300 finders’ warrants, with each warrant exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.40 until December 23, 2018. We issued the shares and warrants in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S for offers and sales outside of the United States and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for offers and sales in the United States and to U.S. persons.  Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the applicable securities were sold in offshore transactions.  We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the securities, and the purchasers of those securities were not U.S. persons and did not acquire the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person. Our reliance on Section 4(a)(2) was based on the fact that each U.S. investor provided us with written representations regarding their status as an accredited investor, as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act. Neither we, nor anyone acting on our behalf, engaged in any advertising or general solicitation in connection with the Private Placement,

On December 27, 2016, we granted an additional 2,142,542 incentive stock options pursuant to our stock option plan to our Chief Executive Officer, Benjamin Mossman. Each option vested immediately and is exercisable by Mr. Mossman into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.24 per share until December 27, 2021. We granted the options in reliance on the exclusion from registration under the Act, or pursuant to an available exemption from registration; and agreed not to engage in hedging transactions with regard to such securities unless in compliance with the Act;


The securities contain a legend to the effect that transfer is prohibited except in accordance with the provisionsprovided by Rule 903 of Regulation S pursuant to registration underbased on the Act, or pursuant tofact that the securities were offered and sold in an available exemption from registration; and that hedging transactions involving those securities mayoffshore transaction.  We did not be conducted unlessengage in complianceany directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the Act; and


We are required, either by contract or a provision in its bylaws, articles, charter or comparable document, to refuse to register any transfergrant of the securities, and the recipient of the options was not madea U.S. person and did not acquire the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person.

On January 24, 2017, we completed the sale of 1,340,000 units at a price of $0.20 per unit for gross proceeds of $268,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of Common Stock and one transferable common stock purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 until January 24, 2019. We paid three finders a cash commission equal to either 2% or 6%, depending on the manner of introduction, of the gross proceeds raised from investors introduced to us by those finders, for a total of $5,220, and issued an aggregate of 26,100 finders’ warrants, with each warrant exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share until January 24, 2019. We issued the shares and warrants underlying the units in accordance withreliance on the provisionsexclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S for offers and sales outside of the United States and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for offers and sales in the United States and to U.S. persons.  Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the applicable securities were sold in offshore transactions.  We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of those securities, and none of the purchasers of those securities was a U.S. person or acquired the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person.  Our reliance on Section 4(a)(2) was based on the fact that the sole U.S. investor provided us with written representations regarding his status as an accredited investor, and that neither we, nor anyone acting on our behalf, engaged in any advertising or public solicitation.

On February 6, 2017, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 455,000 units at a price of $0.25 per unit for gross proceeds of $113,750 comprising the first tranche of an offering of up to 800,000 units.  Each unit consisted of one share of our Common Stock and one transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 until February 6, 2019.  We paid a finder a cash commission of $2,625, being 6%

 II-4

of the gross proceeds, and issued 10,500 finders’ warrants, being 6% of the number of units, on the funds raised from investors introduced to us by that finder.  Each warrant is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share until February 6, 2019. In addition, on February 7, 2017, we granted 500,000 incentive stock options pursuant to our stock option plan to Skanderbeg Capital Advisors Inc., our investors’ relations consultants. Each of these options vested immediately and is exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.33 per share until February 7, 2020. We issued the shares and warrants comprising the units we sold, and granted the incentive stock options and the finders’ warrants we issued, in reliance on the exclusion from registration under the Act, or pursuant to an available exemption from registration; provided however, that if any law of any Canadian province prevents us from refusing to register securities transfers, other reasonable procedures, such as a legend described in paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(B)(3)by Rule 903 of Regulation S have been implementedfor offers and sales outside of the United States and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D thereunder for offers and sales in the United States and to preventU.S. persons.  Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the securities were sold in offshore transactions.  We did not engage in any transferdirected selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the securities, and none of the purchasers of those securities was a U.S. person or acquired the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person.  Our reliance on Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506(b) was based on the fact that the sole U.S. investor in the placement provided us with written representations regarding his status as an accredited investor, and that neither we nor anyone acting on our behalf engaged in any general advertising or general solicitation.

On April 3, 2017, we granted 500,000 incentive stock options pursuant to our stock option plan to John D. Anderson, a member of our board of directors. Each option vested immediately and is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.27 per share until April 3, 2022.  We granted the options in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S based on the fact that the securities were offered and sold in an offshore transaction.  We did not madeengage in accordanceany directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the provisionssale of the securities, Mr. Anderson is not a U.S. person, nor did he acquire the securities for the account or for the benefit of any U.S. person.

On April 20, 2017, and in connection with the appointment of Alan R. Edwards and Thomas I. Vehrs to our board of directors, we granted, pursuant to our stock option plan, 500,000 incentive stock options to Alan R. Edwards and 400,000 incentive stock options to Thomas I. Vehrs.  Each option vested immediately and is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.28 per share until April 20, 2020.  We granted the options in reliance on the exemption in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act based on the availability to the grantees of information regarding the Company and the private nature of the transactions.

On May 5, 2017, we completed the sale of 9,009,814 units at a price of $0.23 per unit for gross proceeds of $2,072,257.  Each unit consisted of one share of our Common Stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 until May 5, 2019. We paid or accrued an aggregate of $101,772 in finders fees payable to two finders, being 6% of the gross proceeds raised, and issued 442,489 finders’ warrants, being 6% of the number of units sold, on the funds received from investors introduced to us by the finders.  Each warrant is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.40 until May 5, 2019. We issued the shares and warrants underlying the units sold and the finders’ warrants issued in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S.S for offers and sales outside of the United States and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D thereunder for offers and sales in the United States and to U.S. persons. Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the securities were sold in offshore transactions. We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the securities, and none of the purchasers of those securities was a U.S. person or acquired the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person. Our reliance on Rule 506(b) was based on the fact that the U.S. investors provided us with written representations regarding their investment intent and status as an accredited investor, and that neither we nor anyone acting on our behalf engaged in any general advertising or general solicitation.




On August 8, 2017, we entered into a shares for debt settlement transaction with one of our creditors, providing for the settlement of approximately $95,952 of indebtedness through the issuance of an aggregate of 417,184 units of our securities at a deemed issue price of $0.23 per unit. Each unit was comprised of one share of Common Stock and one common stock purchase warrant.  Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one additional share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 until May 5, 2019. We relied on Rule 903 of Regulation S for the offer and sale of the units to the creditor, based on the fact that the units were sold in an offshore transaction. We have not engaged in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the units and the creditor was not a U.S. person and did not acquire the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person.

 II-5


On September 25, 2017, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 7,077,140 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $1,061,571 comprising the first tranche of an offering of up to 24,000,000 units.  Each unit consisted of one share of our Common Stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional share of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 until September 25, 2019.  We paid or accrued an aggregate of $540 in finder’s fees payable to one finder, being 6% of the gross proceeds raised, and issued 3,600 finder’s warrants, being 6% of the number of units sold, on the funds received from investors introduced to us by the finder.  Each warrant is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.25 until September 25, 2019. We issued the shares and warrants underlying the units sold and the finder’s warrants issued in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S for offers and sales outside of the United States and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D thereunder for offers and sales in the United States and to U.S. persons. Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the securities were sold in offshore transactions. We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the securities, and none of the purchasers of those securities was a U.S. person or acquired the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person. Our reliance on Rule 506(b) was based on the fact that the U.S. investors provided us with written representations regarding their investment intent and status as an accredited investor, and that neither we nor anyone acting on our behalf engaged in any general advertising or general solicitation.


On December 27, 2017, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 6,417,000 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $962,550 comprising the second tranche of an offering of up to 24,000,000 units. Each unit consisted of one share of our Common Stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional share of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 until December 27, 2019. We paid or accrued an aggregate of $55,779 in finders’ fees payable to two finders, being 6% of the gross proceeds, and issued 371,860 finders’ warrants, being 6% of the number of units sold, on the funds received from investors introduced to us by the finders. Each warrant is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.25 until December 27, 2019. We issued the shares and warrants underlying the units sold and the finders’ warrants issued in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S for offers and sales outside of the United States and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D thereunder for offers and sales in the United States and to U.S. persons. Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the securities were sold in offshore transactions. We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the securities, and none of the purchasers of those securities was a U.S. person or acquired the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person. Our reliance on Rule 506(b) was based on the fact that the U.S. investors provided us with written representations regarding their investment intent and status as an accredited investor, and that neither we nor anyone acting on our behalf engaged in any general advertising or general solicitation.

On January 3, 2018, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 133,333 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for gross proceeds of $20,000 comprising the third and final tranche of an offering of up to 24,000,000 units. Each unit consisted of one share of our Common Stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional share of Common Stock at a price of $0.25 until January 3, 2020. We issued the shares and warrants underlying the units sold in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S. Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the securities were sold in offshore transactions. We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the sale of the securities, and none of the purchasers of those securities was a U.S. person or acquired the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person.

On April 18, 2018, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 35,161,000 units at a price of $0.10 per unit for gross proceeds of $3,516,100. Each unit consisted of one share of our Common Stock and one non-transferable share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional share of Common Stock at a price of $0.15 until April 18, 2021. We paid or accrued an aggregate of $2,100 in finder’s fees payable to a finder, being 6% of the gross proceeds, and issued 21,000 finder’s warrants, being 6% of the number of units sold, on the funds received from investors introduced to us by the finder. Each warrant is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.15 until April 18, 2020. We issued the shares and warrants underlying the units sold and the finder’s warrants issued in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S for offers and sales outside of the United States and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D thereunder for offers and sales in the United States and to U.S. persons. Our reliance on Rule 903 was based on the fact that the securities were sold in offshore transactions. We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in

 II-6

26

connection with the sale of the securities, and none of the purchasers of those securities was a U.S. person or acquired the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person. Our reliance on Rule 506(b) was based on the fact that the U.S. investors provided us with written representations regarding their investment intent and status as an accredited investor, and that neither we nor anyone acting on our behalf engaged in any general advertising or general solicitation.



Exhibits


Exhibit

NumberDescription


3.1*

Articles of Incorporation

3.2*

Bylaws

5.1*

Legal opinion with consent to use

10.1*

Mineral property agreement datedOn April 18, 20072018, we granted a total of 6,381,000 incentive stock options pursuant to our stock option plan to various employees, consultants and directors including: 2,631,000 to our Chief Executive Officer, Benjamin W. Mossman; 1,200,000 to John Proust, a member of our Board of Directors; 300,000 to our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Vince W. Boon; 300,000 to our Corporate Secretary, Eileen Au; 300,000 to Alan R. Edwards, the Chairman of our Board of Directors; 250,000 Thomas I. Vehrs, a member of our Board of Directors; and 250,000 to John D. Anderson, a member of our Board of Directors. Each option vested immediately and is exercisable into one share of our Common Stock at a price of $0.12 per share until April 18, 2023.  The remaining 1,150,000 options were granted to some of our consultants who were eligible to participate in our stock option plan. We granted the options in reliance on the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903 of Regulation S for grants outside of the United States and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for grants in the United States and to U.S. persons. Our reliance on Rule 903 of Regulation S was based on the fact that the securities were offered and sold in an offshore transaction.  We did not engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the grant of the securities and none of the persons receiving those securities was a U.S. person, nor did they acquire the securities for the account or for the benefit of any U.S. person. Our reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of Rule 506(b) was based on the availability to the grantees of the incentive stock options of information regarding our company, our properties and operations and the private nature of the transactions.

23.1

Consent of K.R. Margetson Ltd., Certified Public AccountantItem 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

99.1*

Location map(a) Exhibits


* previouslyThe Exhibits filed herewith are set forth on the Index to Exhibits filed as exhibits to oura part of this registration statement beginning on Form S-1 dated February 19, 2007page II-9 hereof.



Item 17. Undertakings.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:


1.

To file, during any period in which it offers or sells securities,sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:statement:


(i)To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;

a.

(ii)To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(iii)To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.


b.

reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in this registration statement; and notwithstanding the forgoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in the volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration Statement; and


c.

include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution.


2.

That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered herein,therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.


 II-7

3.

To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered hereby which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

4.

That for determining our liability under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, we undertake that in a primary offering of our securities pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, we will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:


 

(i) any preliminaryIf the registrant is relying on Rule 430B:

(A) Each prospectus orfiled by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the filed prospectus that we file relating towas deemed part of and included in the offeringregistration statement; and

(B) Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 (Section 230.424424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of this chapter);


      (ii)a registration statement in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) for the purpose of providing the information required by section 10(a) of the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any free writing prospectusperson that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the offering prepared by or on our behalf or used or referredsecurities in the registration statement to by us;


     (iii) the portion of any other free writingwhich that prospectus relating torelates, and the offering containing material information about usof such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or our securities provided by or on behalf of us; and





27




     (iv) any other communicationprospectus that is an offerpart of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the offeringregistration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made by usin any such document immediately prior to such effective date; or

(ii) If the purchaser.


Eachregistrant is subject to Rule 430(C), each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness.Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.


Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, above, or otherwise, we havethe registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable.


In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities other(other than the payment by usthe registrant of expenses incurred or paid by one of our directors, officers,a director, officer or controlling personsperson of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding,proceeding) is asserted by one of our directors, officers,such director, officer or controlling person sinin connection with the securities being registered, wethe registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and we will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.




 II-8


SIGNATURES


28



Signatures


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Vancouver, Province of British Columbia, Canada on November 5, 2009.


Atlantic Resources Inc.


By: /s/ Raffi KhorchidianMay 29, 2018.

 

-------------------------------------

Rise Gold Corp.
By: /s/ Benjamin W. Mossman
Benjamin W. Mossman
Chief Executive Officer and President

 

Raffi Khorchidian

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


In accordance withPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement washas been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated:indicated.


NameTitleDate

By: /s/ Benjamin W. Mossman

Benjamin W. Mossman

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)May 29, 2018

By: /s/ Vince W. Boon

Vince W. Boon

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)May 29, 2018

By: /s/ Alan R. Edwards

Alan R. Edwards

Chairman and DirectorMay 29, 2018

By: /s/ John G. Proust

John G. Proust

DirectorMay 29, 2018

By: /s/ Thomas I. Vehrs

Thomas I. Vehrs

DirectorMay 29, 2018

By: /s/ John D. Anderson

John D. Anderson

DirectorMay 29, 2018

 II-9

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.Document
3.1Articles of Incorporation, as amended to date (4)
3.2Bylaws (1)
5.1Legal opinion of SecuritiesLawUSA, PC *
10.1Incentive Stock Option Plan dated March 23, 2016 (4)
10.2Employment Agreement with Benjamin Mossman dated July 7, 2016 (4)
10.3Option Agreement among the Earl C & Erica Erickson Trust, Tangold, LLC, and the Estate of Mary Bouma and the registrant dated as of August 30, 2016 (2)
10.4Employment Agreement with Cale Thomas dated October 1, 2016 (4)
10.5Extension of the Idaho-Maryland Option Agreement dated November 30, 2016 (2)
10.6Extension of the Idaho-Maryland Option Agreement dated December 28, 2016 (2)
10.7Option Agreement with Sierra Pacific Industries Inc. dated as of January 6, 2017 (2)
10.8Extension of the Sierra Pacific Industries Inc. Option Agreement dated March 15, 2017 (3)
10.9Employment Agreement with Benjamin Mossman dated as of April 19, 2017 (replacing Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.2) (4)
10.10Geological Consulting Services Agreement with Fred Tejada effective as of April 20, 2017 (4)
10.11Extension of the Sierra Pacific Industries Inc. Option Agreement dated June 7, 2017 (4)
10.12Extension of the Sierra Pacific Industries Inc. Option Agreement dated September 1, 2017 (5)
10.13April 16, 2018 Amendment to the Employment Agreement with Benjamin Mossman dated as of April 19, 2017 *
10.14May 1, 2018 Consulting Services Agreement with Cale Thomas*
10.15Consulting Agreement dated April 18, 2018 with J. Proust & Associates Inc. *
21.1Subsidiaries of the registrant (4)
23.1Consent of Davidson & Company LLP *
23.2Consent of SecuritiesLawUSA, PC (contained in Exhibit 5.1) *
23.3Consent of Gregory Kenneth Kulla, PGeo. *

*

SIGNATURE

CAPACITY IN WHICH SIGNED

DATE

/s/ Raffi Khorchidian

Raffi Khorchidian

President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, principal accounting officer, principal financial officer and Director

November 5, 2009

Filed herewith
(1)Previously included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-1 registration statement filed with the Commission on February 19, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
(2)Previously included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended January 31, 2017 filed with the Commission on March 17, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference
(3)Previously included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended April 30, 2017 filed with the Commission on June 14, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference
(4)Previously included as exhibit to Form S-1 registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 5, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference
(5)Previously included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 21, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference




 II-10