As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 21 , 2015

 Registration No.

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549

Form S-1

Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT


UNDER


THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

eWellness Healthcare Corporation
(Exact nameName of Registrant as specifiedSpecified in its charter)
Charter)

Nevada[                        ]808245-1560906
(State or Otherother Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
Incorporation)
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
Code)
(I.R.S.IRS Employer
Identification Number)
No.)

11825 Major Street,

Culver City, CaliforniaCA 90230, Ph

one: (310) 915-9700
(714) 505-4460

(Address including zip code, and telephone number,Telephone Number of Registrant's Principal Executive Offices and Principal Place of Business)

Intercorp Services Inc., 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500s, Las Vegas, NV 89169
(Agent for Service)
Copies to:
Thomas J. Craft, Jr., Esq.
P.O. Box 4143
Tequesta, FL 33469
(561) 317-7036
Office of Richard Rubin
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
(212) 400-7198

including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Copies to:

Louis Taubman, Esq.

Hunter Taubman Fischer

1450 Broadway, 26th Floor

New York, New York 10018

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. [X]

x
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offeringOffering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration Statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same Offering. ¨
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

Offering. ¨
If this Formdelivery of the Prospectus is a post-effective amendment filedexpected to be made pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act,434, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

box. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”filer," "accelerated filer" and “smaller"smaller reporting company”company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer[  ] ¨Accelerated filer[  ] ¨
Non-accelerated filer[  ] ¨Smaller reporting company[X]x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of each class of securities to be registered Amount to be
registered (1)
  Proposed
maximum
offering price
per share (2)
  Proposed
maximum
aggregate
offering price
  Amount of
registration fee (3)
 
Common Stock  

1,002,906

(4) $0.35  $

351,017.10

  $

40.79

 
Common Stock underlying Warrants  

297,375

(5) $0.35  $

104,081.25

  $

12.09

 
Total  

1,300,281

          $

52.88

 

(1) This Registration Statement covers the resale by our selling shareholder of up to 1,300,281 shares of common stock. Pursuant to Rule 416 and 457 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the shares of common stock offered hereby also include such presently indeterminate number of shares of our common stock as shall be issued by the Registrant to the selling stockholders to prevent dilution resulting from stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions.

(2) The offering price has been estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(a). Our common stock is not traded on any national exchange and in accordance with Rule 457, the offering price was determined by the price of the shares that were sold to our shareholders in a private placement, as further described below. The price of $0.35 is a fixed price at which the selling security holders shall sell their shares until they are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, after which time they will be sold at prevailing market prices; we are currently in the process of applying to have our common stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. There can be no assurance that our application for quotation will be approved.

(3) The Registrant previously paid $201.82 in connection with the filing of the initial Registration Statement to which this serves as Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 .

(4)Includes 572,118 shares of common stock underlying $200,241.30 Series A Convertible Redeemable Notes (the “Notes”) issued pursuant to the private placement of up to $1,200,000 principal amount of Notes we completed on April 9, 2015 (the “Private Placement”) and 430,788 shares issuable to a consultant pursuant to a Consulting and Service Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”).

(5) Includes 297,375 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants issued pursuant to the Private Placement.

Calculation of Registration Fee
Title of Securities To Be RegisteredAmount to be Registered(1)Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per ShareProposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(2)Registration Fee(3)
Common Stock, $0.001 per share9,519,229$0.092$875,769.07$101.50
(1) Consists of up to 9,519,229 shares of Common Stock to be sold to Tangiers Global, LLC under the amended and restated Investment Agreement dated February 14, 2017.
(2) The Offering price has been estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) of the Securities Act and is based upon the closing price of $0.09 per share of the Registrant's Common Stock on the OTCQB Market on April 7, 2017.
(3) Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) and based on the closing price per share of $0.09 for eWellness Healthcare Corporation's Common Stock on April 7, 2017 as reported by the OTCQB.

The registrantRegistrant hereby amends this registration statementRegistration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrantRegistrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statementRegistration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with sectionSection 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statementRegistration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said sectionSection 8(a), may determine.

THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. THE SELLING STOCKHOLDERS MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES PUBLICLY UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.The information in this Prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission becomes effective. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED August 21 , 2015ON APRIL__, 2017

PROSPECTUS

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

1,300,281 Shares of9,519,229 SHARES OF Common Stock

This prospectusProspectus relates to the sale byresale of 9,519,229 shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the "Common Stock"), issuable to Tangiers Global, LLC (defined below).

This Prospectus relates to the selling shareholders listed on page 43resale of up to 1,300,2819,519,229 shares of the Common Shares, issuable to Tangiers Global, LLC ("Tangiers"), a selling stockholder pursuant to a "put right" under an Investment Agreement (the "Investment Agreement"), dated February 14, 2017, that we entered into with Tangiers. The Investment Agreement permits us to "put" up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) in shares of our common stock.Common Stock to Tangiers over a period of up to thirty-six (36) months or until $5,000,000 of such shares have been "put."

Initially, t heThe selling stockholders named herein will sell the common stock at the fixed price of $0.35 per share until our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board; thereafter the common stock shall be sold at prevailing market prices may sell common stock from time to time in the principal market on which the stock is traded at the prevailing market price, at prices related to such prevailing market price, in negotiated transactions or a combination of such methods of sale and pursuant to any other method permitted by applicable law. Although we are currently in the process of applying to have our common stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, there can be no assurance that our application for quotation will be approved. Unless all or a portion of the 1,300,281shares being offered pursuant to this Prospectus at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at varying prices or at negotiated prices.

The total amount of shares of common stock issuable upon exerciseCommon Stock which may be sold pursuant to this Prospectus would constitute 9.99% of the Warrants,Company's issued and outstanding Common Stock as of April 7, 2017, assuming that the selling security holders will sell all of the shares offered for sale.

Tangiers Global, LLC is an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to which this prospectus relates, are exercised, webe "underwriters" within the meaning of the Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Act.

Our Common Stock is subject to quotation on OTCQB Market under the symbol EWLL. On April 7, 2017, the last reported sales price for our Common Stock was $0.09 per share. We urge prospective purchasers of our Common Stock to obtain current information about the market prices of our Common Stock. We will not receive any proceeds from the salessale of shares of our Common Stock by the selling stockholders.

The numberstockholder. However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock which may be sold by eachour Common Stock pursuant to our exercise of the put right offered by Tangiers. We will pay for expenses of this offering, except that the selling stockholders are subject under certain conditionsstockholder will pay any broker discounts or commissions or equivalent expenses and expenses of its legal counsel applicable to certain agreed upon limits described elsewherethe sale of its shares.

The prices at which the Selling Security Holders may sell the shares of Common Stock in this prospectus.Offering will be determined by the prevailing market price for the shares of Common Stock or in negotiated transactions.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. 

THIS INVESTMENT INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. YOU SHOULD PURCHASE SHARES ONLY IF YOU CAN AFFORD A COMPLETE LOSS OF YOUR INVESTMENT. SEE “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 9 FOR A DISCUSSION OF RISKS APPLICABLE TO US AND AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK.Investing in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. See "Risk Factors" to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of our Common Stock.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

The dateDate of this prospectus is August 21 , 2015.This Prospectus is: April __, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary3
Page
The OfferingProspectus Summary7
4
Summary of Financial DataInformation8
Notes Regarding Forward-Looking Statements9
Risk Factors9
Selected Financial Information17
Use of Proceeds1822
Determination of Offering Price22
Dilution22
Selling Security Holders23
Plan of Distribution24
Description of Securities to be Registered26
Interests of Named Experts and Counsel27
Where You Can Find More Information27
Description of Business28
Description of Property38
Legal Proceedings38
Market for Our Common Stock, DividendsEquity and Related Stockholder InformationMatters19
38
Management’sIndex to Financial StatementsF-42 - F-62
Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and ResultsPlan of Operations20
63
BusinessChanges in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure25
67
ManagementDirectors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons3667
Executive Compensation70
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management41
71
Selling StockholdersTransactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons44
Plan of Distribution46
Description of Securities47
Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities48
Part II
Item 13. Other Expenses Of Issuance And Distribution50
Item 15. Recent Sales Of Unregistered Securities50
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule51
Item 17. Undertakings5272

Please read this Prospectus carefully and in its entirety. This Prospectus contains disclosure regarding our business, our financial condition and results of operations and risk factors related to our business and our Common Stock, among other material disclosure items. We have prepared this Prospectus so that you will have the information necessary to make an informed investment decision.

You should rely only on information contained in this Prospectus. We have not authorized any other person to giveprovide you with different information. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell, nor is it seeking an offer to buy, these securities in any supplementalstate where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information orin this Prospectus is complete and accurate as of the date on the front cover, but the information may have changed since that date.

The Registration Statement containing this Prospectus, including the exhibits to make any representations for us. You should not rely upon anythe Registration Statement, provides additional information about us that is not contained inour Company and the Common Stock offered under this prospectus or in one of our public reports filed withProspectus. The Registration Statement, including the exhibits and the documents incorporated herein by reference, can be read on the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and incorporated into this prospectus. Information contained in this prospectuswebsite or in our public reports may become stale. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus, any prospectus supplement or any documents incorporated by reference are accurate as of any date other than their respective dates, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the shares. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates. The selling stockholders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted.

Until [ ], all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters.

2

Explanatory Note:This Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-204465), as amended on July 15, 2015 and August 6, 2015 (collectively, the “Registration Statement”), is being filed in response to comments the Company received fromat the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regardingoffices mentioned under the Registration Statement. Due to the comments, we revised the cover page of the prospectus to state that the selling shareholders will sell at a fixed price until our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at prevailing market prices; please note however that although we are in the process of applying to have our common stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, there can be no guarantee that it will be so listed. Also in response to the SEC’s comments, we reduced the number of shares being registered that underlie the warrants issued in the private placement.heading "Where You Can Find More Information."

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information appearingcontained elsewhere in this prospectus. While this summary highlights what weProspectus. It does not contain all the information that you should consider to bebefore investing in the most important information about us, youCommon Stock. You should carefully read this prospectusthe entire Prospectus, including "Risk Factors", "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the registration statement of whichFinancial Statements, before making an investment decision. In this prospectus is a part in their entirety before investing in our common stock, especiallyProspectus, the risks of investing in our common stock, which we discuss later in “Risk Factors,”terms "eWellness" "Company," "Registrant," "we," "us" and our financial statements and related notes beginning on page 48. Unless the context requires otherwise, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” “eWellness” and the “Company”"our" refer to eWellness Healthcare Corporation.

Corporation, a Nevada corporation.

Our Business Plan

eWellnessThe Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 7, 2011 as Dignyte, Inc., to engage in May 2013. Followingany lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions.

On April 11, 2014, the Company entered into a share exchange we completed in April 2014,agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") pursuant to which the Company agreed to purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of eWellness in exchange for 9,200,000 shares of Common Stock. As a result, eWellness became a wholly-owned subsidiary and its shareholders owned approximately 77% of our then issued and outstanding Common Stock. On July 22, 2015, our wholly-owned subsidiary, eWellness Corporation, was merged into the Company and, therefore, no longer exists as a Nevada corporation became our wholly owned subsidiary, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing eWellness Corporation’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. Our historical business and operations will continue independently. eWellnessseparate entity.

The Company is an early-stage Los Angeles based medical technology companycorporation that combines digital physical therapy with progressive in-home exercise programsplans to provide a unique telemedicine platform that includes active real-time monitoring and assessment by physical therapists. Our services are provisioned through ouroffers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Program utilizing our proprietary WWW.PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform initiallyPrograms to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems, andin addition to in-office visits.sessions. Based on today’scurrent insurance landscape,reimbursement policies, we expect to generate our main revenue source shall comerevenues from a combination of in-office and telemedicine visits. Amid ongoing challenges and changes within the healthcare industry, telemedicine is emerging as an increasingly attractive tool for delivering quality medical services.

As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have one patient who is fully monitored on ourWWW.PHZIO.COM platform with limited insurance reimbursement to date; however, our WWW.PHZIO.COM platform is fully operational, we have completed an 8-week patient in-house study in Los Angeles and as of April 29, 2015 we are provisioning our WWW.PHZIO.COM program to patients in Los Angeles through a cooperation agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy (“EPT”). (See “Recent Developments” and “Business – PHZIO Platform”)

To date, we have not identified any other program that is designed to provide insurance reimbursable Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Telemedicine that has been specifically designed to help prevent pre-diabetic patients from becoming diabetic and therefore believe that once adequately funded, we will be the first to market with our specific innovative service and program. Our program combines in-office direct-contact physical therapy evaluations, re-evaluations and physical performance testing with an on-line telemedicine exercise program. This business model allows us to bill for traditional in-office patient visits and when insurance companies allow, for our telemedicine exercise program sessions too. We also intend to offer to enroll our patients in a no-cost online healthy living nutrition and meal planning platform to be developed in the second quarter of 2015.

Assuming we receive sufficient financing to do so, we intend to start servicing patients in the second fiscal quarter of 2015 in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, when we also anticipate rolling out ourWWW.PHZIO.COM platform. As an innovator of certain services, we are aware that the proposed DMpt services will be launched in an industry with deeply established and regulated billing approaches. For this reason, we designed a business model to succeed in the current billing environment by anticipating that the only reimbursement available to us for the next three years will be generated by using procedures and codes that insurance providers currently accept, even though we believe insurance companies will start providing more telemedicine reimbursement prior to such time given its benefits. Currently, depending on each patient’s insurance coverage, existing codes cover up to 14 in-office visits and/or up to 24 remotely monitored physical therapy sessions during our six-month program. Today, some insurance companies do not reimburse for any physical therapy sessions, whether or not they are monitored, and none of the insurance companies within our patient base provide codes that reimburse non-monitored physical therapy sessions. Our plans and goals factor in these non-reimbursed sessions as part of the overall Cost of Goods Sold (COGS); we still believe that we can earn revenues and generate profit based solely on the services for which insurance companies currently provide reimbursement. In light of current insurance practices, we configured four separate reimbursement plans designed to maximize the needs of today’s patient base. Our DMpt system is currently configured to deliver a six-month therapy program with at least three sessions per week using a combination of 78 remote monitored and/or remote non-monitored therapy sessions and 6 to 26 in-office visits (number of office visits depend on insurance coverage). This assures us that we will be able to deliver a consistent service to the patients and achieve our internal operating goals without any innovation in the insurance industry codes. While the current, somewhat archaic, reimbursement standards do not reimburse for some aspects of our six month program, based upon feedback from industry leaders, we believe that the regulatory and insurance environment is trending towards a payment structure that will be more favorable to remote monitored and non-monitored programs within the telemedicine sphere, although there can be no guarantee such trend will be realized. Part of our current plan is to compile six months of compelling patient outcomes in the form of a clinical study, to submit to the insurance agencies to encourage the trend towards remote-services based reimbursement and enhance our reimbursement opportunities. Regardless, our business model suggests that we will be able to generate revenues and sustain a profitable business; however, there is no guarantee that we will be able to generate any revenues or realize any profits, as we have yet to launch any of our services. If the insurance industry recognizes the advantages telemedicine can provide to patients, medical professionals and insurance companies, and then more readily provides reimbursement for same, we will stand to earn significant more revenues.

Our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (“DMpt”) program, including: design, testing, exercise intervention, follow-up, and exercise demonstration, has been developed by accomplished Los Angeles based physical therapist Darwin Fogt. Mr. Fogt has extensive experience and education working with diverse populations from professional athletes to morbidly obese. He understands the most beneficial exercise prescription to achieve optimal results and has had great success in motivating all patient types to stay consistent in working toward their goals. Additionally, his methods have proven effective and safe as he demonstrates exercises with attention to proper form to avoid injury. Mr. Fogt has established himself as a national leader in his field and has successfully implemented progressive solutions to delivering physical therapy: he has consulted with and been published by numerous national publications including Runner’s World, Men’s Health, Men’s Journal, and various Physical Therapy specific magazines; his 13 plus years of experience include rehabilitating the general population, as well as professional athletes, Olympic gold medalists, and celebrities. He has bridged the gap between physical therapy and fitness by opening EPT, which uses licensed physical therapists to teach high intensity circuit training fitness classes. He also founded one of the first exclusive prenatal and postnatal physical therapy clinic in the country. Mr. Fogt is a leader in advancing the profession to incorporate research-based methods and focus on, not only rehabilitation but also wellness, functional fitness, performance, and prevention. He is able to recognize that the national healthcare structure (federal and private insurance) is moving toward a model of prevention and that the physical therapy profession will take a larger role in providing wellness services to patients.

Our History

We entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Initial Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which we agreed to issue 9,200,000 shares of our unregistered common stock, $.001 par value (the “common stock”), to the shareholders of eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“eWellness” or “Private Co.”). In addition, our former chief executive officer agreed to tender 5,000,000 shares of common stock back to the Company for cancellation and also to assign from his holdings an additional 2,500,000 shares to the shareholders of eWellness Corporation resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders, as well as a further assignment of an additional 2,100,000 shares to other parties as stated therein. There were no warrants, options or other equity instruments issued in connection with the share exchange agreement.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. However, Rule 419 required that the share exchange transaction (the “Share Exchange”) contemplated by the Initial Exchange Agreement occur on or before March 18, 2014. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management and eWellness, the parties entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the 419 transaction into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”). We also agreed to change our name to eWellness Healthcare Corporation to more accurately reflect our new business and operations after the Share Exchange, which occurred and was effective as of April 25, 2014.

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, we purchased 100% of eWellness’ common stock in exchange for 9,200,000 shares of our then outstanding shares of common stock and the share exchange closed. As a result, eWellness became our wholly owned subsidiary and its shareholders owned approximately 76.97% of our then issued and outstanding common stock, after giving effect to the cancellation of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock held by Andreas A. McRobbie-Johnson, our former chief executive officer and the further assignment of his shares of common stock as described therein.

Recent Developments

In early November 2014, we were advised by the California State Board of Physical Therapy (“CSBPT”("CSBPT") that we could operate our PHZIO.COM platform (the "Platform") and bill patients insurance within the Association’sAssociation's rules in the state of California. That led us to induct sample patients into our PHZIO.COM platform at our Culver City offices and completeDuring an 8-week research study where we successfully billed for telemedicine visits for one of our patients who has Blue Shield insurance.insurance for telemedicine-based therapies based on our Platform.

Following that study, we determined that it would be significantly less expensive to launch our services in California rather than New York, as initially planned. AsOur Platform offers a result, our introductions totelemedicine exercise program, prescribed by a physician offices will now come from existing relationships heldwhich is reimbursable by our CEO, Darwin Fogt, rather than from Millennium Healthcare, Inc., (“MHI”). In December 2014, we determined that it was possible to license our PHZIO.com platform to anyan insurance. It is a physical therapy practice underexercise program designed around a “White Labeling”1 program in returnspecific exercises kit that includes: an inflatable exercise ball, latex resistance bands, a yoga mat and stretch strap (the "Exercise Kit") that provides a comprehensive exercise regimen.

Our Platform is an on-line based, monitored telemedicine exercise program for a 6-month period, wherein seventy-eight (78) individual 40 minute progressive exercise sessions are watched & interacted with by a patient on their laptop computer.
The patients are inducted to our program through a physician prescription and physical therapist evaluation. The physical therapy program is designed around an Exercise Kit.
The patient follows the instructions and performs the specific exercises while being remotely monitored by a physical therapist through the camera located on the laptop computer. The program provides a comprehensive exercise regiment that minimizes stress on the joints while allowing for hundreds of progressive exercises that focuses on strength, balance, coordination, and flexibility.
The program is designed to be operated in a patient's home or office in order to increase compliance and eliminate transportation to a fitness center or gym.
Our physical therapists monitor up to 30 patients at a time while these patients are on-line and following along with our exercise program. Each patient and physical therapist has real-time text and video conferencing capability when interaction is needed between the patient and our physical therapist.

When patients are referred to us, a physical therapist and assistant will evaluate patients for the program. The goal is to ensure compliance with the regimen, reduce BMI to a percentage ofhealthy number, help patients lose weight and boost their activity level for the reimbursements such therapists receive from patients participating in our PHZIO.COM program; we hope to begin white labeling our PHZIO.COM platform by August 2015. Due to the transition to our PHZIO.COM platform, our relationship with MHI is now more of a marketing arrangement in which they market their cardio testing services to physicians, who may incorporate our platform.six-month program.

1“White-labeling” is the strategy in which a company (the marketer) rebrands another company’s (the producer) product to make it appear as if the marketer had made it.

OnIn April 1, 2015, we entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy ("EPT"), a company owned by our CEO, pursuant to which EPT wherein we agreed that EPT would be able to operate our telemedicine platform www.phzio.comPlatform and offeroffers it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. We shall receive 75% of the net insurance reimbursements from the patient for use of the platform. We will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments – computer equipment, office or facilities rental payments, physical therapist or physical therapy assistant, administrative staff, patient induction equipment, office supplies, utilities and other associated operating costs. It is anticipated that the operation of the platform by EPT will generate positive cash flow within 120 days from the start of patient induction. On May 7, 2015, EPT inducted the first patient using www.phzio.com.

On April 17, 2015,In November 2016, we entered into an agreementa Services Agreement with Akash Bajaj, M.D., M.P.H.Bistromatics, Inc. (the "Bistromatics Agreement"), pursuant to which Dr. Bajaj shall serve as a consultant and as the ChairmanBistromatics will provide operational oversight of our Clinical Advisory Board.Platform.

Page 4


Notwithstanding our belief that our Platform represents a new way to offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Programs, there are a number of potential difficulties that we might face, including the following:

Ÿ We may not obtain and maintain sufficient protection of our intellectual property;
Ÿ Our Platform program may be shown to have characteristics that may render it ineffective for Distance Monitored Physical Therapy;
Ÿ Our Platform may not become widely accepted by patients and insurances;
Ÿ Strict and/or new government regulations may hinder the growth of our business; and
Ÿ
We may not be able to raise sufficient additional funds to fully implement our business plan and grow our business.

Summary of Risk Factors

This offering involves substantial risk. Our ability to execute our business strategy is also subject to certain risks. The termrisks described under the heading "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this Prospectus may cause us not to realize the full benefits of our business plan and strategy or may cause us to be unable to successfully execute all or part of our strategy. Some of the agreement is for one year with annual renewalmost significant challenges and risks include the following:

Ÿ Our Auditor has expressed substantial doubt as desired. The agreement further sets the hourly rate to be paid at $225 per hour with payment to be at the end of each month. Further, we granted Dr. Bajaj a five-year non-statutory option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.35 per share. The options will vest over a 12 month period at 8,333 per month.

Initially, we believed that our success depended on our ability to maintain our relationship with MHI and their successful marketing and usecontinue as a going concern.
Ÿ Our limited operating history does not afford investors a sufficient history on which to base an investment decision.
Ÿ Our revenues will be dependent upon acceptance of our product. Platform by patients and insurances, specifically changes in insurances reimbursement policies, will cause us to curtail or cease operations.
ŸWe also noted that our initialmay face new entrances and sole service contract coveredincreasing competition in the New York City and northern New Jersey tri-borough area. However, our disclosure as of October 2014 also statedDistance Monitored Physical Therapy market.
Ÿ We cannot be certain that we had not yet requiredwill obtain patents for our proprietary technology or utilized MHI’s reimbursement services, nor had MHI marketed our services asthat such patents will protect us.
Ÿ The availability of such date, which remains true asa large number of the date of this Registration Statement. Frustrated by these results and always seeking different ways to achieve success and break into the market, we realized the opportunity provided by the information from the CSBPT. As a measure to augment our contract with MHI and diversify our revenue base, we have pursued other opportunities revealed by the information from the CSBPT. Below is an illustration of the ways in which our PHZIO.COM platform may likely reduce costs and improve patient outcomes. In light of the potential created by our platform and the Association’s rules, we moved our initial focus and efforts from the New York/New Jersey area to California.

As of the date of this Statement, we accomplished the following:

What We Have Built To Date:Over the last two and one-half years in four phases we have conceptualized, developed, designed, programed, built and tested our PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform.

Phase I: Q-3 and Q4 2013 and all of 2013: Designed unique exercise video-based program and designed PHZIO video & telemedicine platform and designed exercise programs.

Phase II: Q-1 and Q-2 2014: Filmed 78 unique 40 minute exercise programing.

Phase III: Q-3 2014: Finalized programing of our PHZIO.COM video management platform and two way interactive telemedicine program.

Phase IV: Q-4 2014: Pilot Study with 8 sample patients working out three days per week for 8-weeks; patients were 100% compliant with the regimen.

Phase V: Q-2 2015: On April 29, 2015, we began provisioning our WWW.PHZIO.COM program to patients in Los Angeles through a cooperation agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy in our first patient induction office located in Marina del Rey, California.

Banking Agreements

At the end of May, we entered into separate financial advisor/consulting agreements with each of Merriman Capital, Inc. and Mavericks Capital LLC. Pursuant to these agreements, each entity has agreed to assist us with our financing plans and other relevant financial advising services. Although no agreements or commitments have been made as of the date of this Registration Statement, we hope that these agreements will enable us to receive additional financing within the next several months. As compensation for their services, and in addition to fees payable upon consummation of specified financing transactions, we agreed to issue each of Merriman and Mavericks a warrant to purchase up to 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share; additionally, we shall pay Merriman and Mavericks $6,000 and $10,000 per month, respectively for their advisory services, although payment is deferred until each begins their respective capital raising activities.

Risk Factors

The securities offered by this prospectus are speculative and involve a high degree of risks associated with our business. For more discussion of these and other risk factors affecting us and our business, see the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 9 of this prospectus.

The Private Placement

On April 9, 2015, we closed a second round of our private placement offering with eight accredited investors in which we raised gross proceeds of approximately $270,080 (including an aggregate of $123,980 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) and sold that same amount of Series A Senior Convertible Redeemable Notes convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.35 per share, subject to adjustment as provided therein (the “Note(s)”), and Series A Warrants (the “Warrant(s)”), all  pursuant to separate Securities Purchase Agreements entered into with each investor (the ”Purchase Agreements”).  Initially, the Notes are convertible into 771,657 shares of Common Stock. The sale was part of the private placement offering in which we offered for sale a maximum of $1,200,000 principal amount of Notes (the “Private Placement”).  Prior to this closing, we raised gross proceeds of $202,500 in the initial closing of the Private Placement and issued approximately $213,337 Notes (to reflect monies owed for certain pre-existing interest payments) and issued Series A Warrants exercisable to purchase up to 609,534 shares of Common Stock. As a result, we raised a total of approximately $472,580 pursuant to the Private Placement and issued an aggregate of approximately $483,417 of Notes and Warrants to purchase up to 1,381,191 shares of our Common Stock.

The Notes were offered on a “best efforts” basis in the Private Placement. The Notes pay a 12.0% cash coupon, payable at maturity (or upon conversion or redemption); accrued unpaid interest shall be payable in shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 (the “Common Stock” ) upon conversion at the option of the Investors. The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt and may not be subordinated to any other debt of the Company, without the appropriate consent from the Note holders. The Notes are secured by the Company’s assets, including cash flow. Following the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission declares this Registration Statement effective, the Notes may be converted by the Investors intoauthorized but unissued shares of Common Stock (the sharesmay, upon their issuance, lead to dilution of existing stockholders.
Ÿ Our stock is thinly traded, sale of your holding may take a considerable amount of time.

Before you invest in our Common Stock, underlyingyou should carefully consider all the Notesinformation in this Prospectus, including matters set forth under the heading "Risk Factors."

Where You Can Find Us

The Company's principal executive office and mailing address is at 11825 Major Street, Culver City, CA 90230, Phone: (310) 915-9700

Our Filing Status as a "Smaller Reporting Company"

We are hereinafter referreda "smaller reporting company," meaning that we are not an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent company that is not a smaller reporting company and have a public float of less than $75 million and annual revenues of less than $50 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. As a "smaller reporting company," the disclosure we will be required to asprovide in our SEC filings are less than it would be if we were not considered a "smaller reporting company." Specifically, "smaller reporting companies" are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosures in their filings; are exempt from the “Note Shares”) at a conversion priceprovisions of $0.35 per share (the “Conversion Price”). In the event the Common Stock shall be listed on a U.S. stock exchange and trade, as determined by the daily closing price, for twenty (20) consecutive trading days at or above $1.50 per share, we may redeem the Notes, in cash or shares of common stock and the holder may elect to convert the Notes into Common Stock at the Conversion Price. Upon an Event of Default, which event shall remain un-remedied for a period of sixty (60) days, the Investors shall have the option to require the Company to redeem its outstanding Notes at a price equal to 150%Section 404(b) of the principal amountSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requiring that independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; are not required to conduct say-on-pay and frequency votes until annual meetings occurring on or after January 21, 2013; and have certain other decreased disclosure obligations in their SEC filings, including, among other things, being redeemed, plus any accruedpermitted to provide two years of audited financial statements in annual reports rather than three years. Decreased disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status as a "smaller reporting company" may make it harder for investors to analyze the Company's results of operations and unpaid interest. As longfinancial prospects.

Page 5


Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

We qualify as anyan emerging growth company as that term is used in the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other burdens that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

Ÿ A requirement to have only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related MD&A;
Ÿ Exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of the Notes shall remain outstanding, the Investors shall be extended standard anti-dilution protection with respect to stock splits, stock dividends and recapitalizations affecting any outstanding Notes.

The Warrants contain cashless exercise provisions in the event a registration statement registering the Common Stock underlying the Warrants is not effective 180 days after the issuance date and is subject to customary anti-dilution protection and registration rights. The Warrants expire on the third anniversaryemerging growth company's internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the issuance dateSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX");
Ÿ Reduced disclosure about the emerging growth company's executive compensation arrangements; and
Ÿ No non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements.

We have already taken advantage of these reduced reporting burdens in this Prospectus, which are also available to us as a smaller reporting company as defined under Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an initial exercise priceemerging growth company can take advantage of $0.35 per share. Each warrant is exercisablethe extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act") for one sharescomplying with new or revised accounting standards. We have elected to take advantage of Common Stock.

Each investor also entered intothe extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, which allows us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a Registration Rights Agreement with the Company under which the Company is obligated to fileresult of this registration statement to register the shares of Common Stock underlying the Notes and Warrants within 30 days following the final Closing.

THE OFFERING

IssuereWellness Healthcare Corporation
Common Stock being offered by Selling Stockholders572,118 shares of common stock underlying $200,241.30 Series A Convertible Redeemable Notes issued pursuant to the private placement we completed on April 9, 2015 (the “Private Placement”);
297,375 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants issued pursuant to the Private Placement; and,
430,788shares issuable to a consultant pursuant to our Consulting and Service Agreement with same. Pursuant to this Agreement, the consultant shall provide advice and guidance regarding investment and general corporate matters.
Selling StockholdersNoteholders and the other entities or persons listed under “Selling Stockholders” elsewhere in this prospectus.
Risk FactorsThe securities offered by this prospectus are speculative and involve a high degree of risk and should only be purchased by investors prepared to sustain a loss of their entire investment. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9.

7

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes the relevant financial data for our business and should be read in conjunction withelection, our financial statements which are included elsewherecontained in this prospectus.Form S-1 may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates. The summary set forth below should be read together withexisting scaled executive compensation disclosure requirements for smaller reporting companies will continue to apply to our consolidated financial statements andfilings for so long as our Company is an emerging growth company, regardless of whether the notes thereto,Company remains a smaller reporting company.

We could remain an emerging growth company for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a "large accelerated filer" as welldefined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our Common Stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and “Management’sof the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

For more details regarding this exemption, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies."

Page 6


The Offering

This Prospectus relates to the resale of 9,519,229 shares of our Common Stock, issuable to Tangiers (defined below).

This Prospectus relates to the resale of up to 9,519,229 shares of the Common Shares, issuable to Tangiers, a selling stockholder pursuant to a "put right" under the Investment Agreement, dated February 14, 2017, that we entered into with Tangiers. The Investment Agreement permits us to "put" up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) in shares of our Common Stock to Tangiers over a period of up to thirty-six (36) months or until $5,000,000 of such shares have been "put."

Common Stock offered by Selling Shareholders

This Prospectus relates to the resale of 9,519,229 shares of our Common Stock, issuable to Tangiers

Common Stock outstanding before the Offering95,287,581 shares of Common Stock as of April 7, 2017.
Common Stock outstanding after the Offering104,806,810 shares of Common Stock (1)
Terms of the OfferingThe Selling Security Holders will determine when and how they will sell the Common Stock offered in this Prospectus. The prices at which the Selling Security Holders may sell the shares of Common Stock in this Offering will be determined by the prevailing market price for the shares of Common Stock or in negotiated transactions.
Termination of the OfferingThe Offering will conclude upon such time as all of the Common Stock has been sold pursuant to the Registration Statement.
Trading MarketOur Common Stock is subject to quotation on the OTCQB Market under the symbol "EWLL".
Use of proceedsThe Company is not selling any shares of the Common Stock covered by this Prospectus. As such, we will not receive any of the Offering proceeds from the registration of the shares of Common Stock covered by this Prospectus. See "Use of Proceeds."

Risk Factors

The Common Stock offered hereby involves a high degree of risk and should not be purchased by investors who cannot afford the loss of his/her/its entire investment. See "Risk Factors".

(1) This total shows how many shares of Common Stock will be outstanding assuming 9,519,229 shares of Common Stock to be put to Tangiers.

Page 7


SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following summary financial data should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis," "Plan of Operation" and the Financial Statements and Notes thereto, included elsewhere in this prospectus.Prospectus. The balance sheet and the statement of operations data are derived from our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

  

For the six months ended June 30,

 
  2015  2014 
  (in thousands) 
Net Revenues $0  $0 
Gross profit        
Comprehensive Loss $

750,959

  $

656,823

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:   
  

As of
June 30, 2015

 
    
Balance Sheet Data:    
     
Current assets $

93,917

 
Total assets  

122,062

 
Total current liabilities, net of debt discounts  

911,507

 
Total liabilities, net of debt discounts  

1,343,387

 
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) $(1,221,325)

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

For the YearFor the Year
December 31, 2016December 31, 2015
(Audited)(Audited)
Revenues$-$-
Total general and administrative expenses(309,805)(196,354)
Total operating expenses(3,371,460)(1,400,240)
Interest expense(981,575)(129,406)
Gain on extinguishment of debt2,216,46011,323
Net loss$(12,460,694)$(1,554,908)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(0.51)$(0.09)
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding - Basic and Diluted24,267,07417,214,861

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2014  2013 
  (in thousands) 
Net Revenues $0  $0 
Gross profit        
Comprehensive Loss $1,339,585  $466,636 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:Data:

December 31, 2016December 31, 2015
 (Audited) (Audited)
Cash and restricted cash$13,995$41,951
Total current assets 737,041 46,004
Total assets758,22871,830
Total current liabilities (10,755,729) (1,476,463)
Total liabilities (10,755,729) (1,476,463)
Total stockholders' deficit$(9,997,501)$(1,404,633)
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$758,228$71,830

  As of
December 31, 2014
 
    
Balance Sheet Data:    
     
Current assets $34,228 
Total assets  60,275 
Total current liabilities, net of debt discounts  679,380 
Total liabilities, net of debt discounts  857,813 
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) $(797,538)

NOTES REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The statementsinformation contained in this prospectusProspectus, including in the documents incorporated by reference into this Prospectus, includes some statements that are not purely historical and that are "forward-looking statements." Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our management's expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions and/or strategies regarding the future, including our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These include statements about the Company’s expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, which are indicated bystatements. The words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “the Company believes,” “management believes”"anticipates," "believes," "continue," "could," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "might," "plans," "possible," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "seeks," "should," "would" and similar expressions, or the negatives of such terms, may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words or phrases. does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Prospectus are based on the Company’s current expectations and are subjectbeliefs concerning future developments and the potential effects on the parties and the transaction. There can be no assurance that future developments actually affecting us will be those anticipated. These that may cause actual results or performance to certainbe materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including the following forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond the parties' control) or other assumptions.

Page 8


RISK FACTORS

The shares of our Common Stock being offered for resale by the Selling Shareholders are highly speculative in nature, involve a high degree of risk and assumptions. The Company’s actualshould be purchased only by persons who can afford to lose their entire amount invested in the Common Stock. Accordingly, prospective investors should carefully consider, along with other matters referred to herein, the following risk factors in evaluating our business before purchasing any shares of Common Stocks. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could differbe materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements includedadversely affected. In such case, you may lose all or part of your investment. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this document are based on information availableProspectus before investing in our Common Stock.

Risks Related to our Financial Condition

Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm has expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

The audited financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result if we cease to continue as a going concern. We believe that in order to continue as a going concern, including the Company oncosts of being a public company, we will need approximately $100,000 per year simply to cover the date hereof,administrative, legal and accounting fees. We plan to fund these expenses primarily through cash flow, the sale of restricted shares of our common stock and the Company assumes no obligationissuance of convertible notes.

Based on our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt as to updateour ability to continue as a going concern. To date we have not generated any such forward-looking statements.

RISK FACTORS

revenue.

Investing in our securities involves a great deal of risk. Careful consideration should be made of the following factors as well as other information included in this prospectusProspectus before deciding to purchase our common stock. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be affected materially and adversely by any or all of these risks.

THE FOLLOWING MATTERS MAY HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR PROSPECTS, FINANCIAL OR OTHERWISE. REFERENCE TO THIS CAUTIONARY STATEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF A FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT OR STATEMENTS SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A STATEMENT THAT ANY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING FACTORS MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT OR STATEMENTS.

Risks Related to our Financial Condition

If we failWe may need to raise additional capital to fund continuing operations and an inability to raise the necessary capital or to do so on acceptable terms could threaten the success of our ability to implement our business model and strategy could be compromised.business.

We have limited capital resources and operations. To date, our operations have been funded entirely from the proceeds from equity and debt financings or loans from our management. While we have sufficient funds once the financing is completed to our launch our PHZIO.COM platformPlatform in Los Angeles, if we take on any additional markets in the United States, we will likely require substantial additional capital in the near future to develop and market new products, services and technologies. We also hope to reach other markets through our “White Labeling” strategy, but that cannot be guaranteed.

future.

We need at least $400,000 to carry out the first phase ofcurrently anticipate that our program. Accordingly, we have closed on sufficient funds necessary to carryout our initial business launch. As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have received and closed on a total of $483,416.88 pursuant to the Private Placement; this isavailable capital resources will be sufficient to allow usmeet our expected working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the near future. We anticipate that we will require an additional $1.5 million during the next twelve months to carry out phase one offulfill our program. Webusiness plan. However, such resources may not be ablesufficient to obtainfund the long-term growth of our business. If we determine that it is necessary to raise additional funds, we may choose to do so through strategic collaborations, licensing arrangements through our "White Labeling" strategy, public or private equity or debt financing, a bank line of credit, or other arrangements.

We cannot be sure that any additional funding will be available on terms acceptablefavorable to us or at all. Even ifAny additional equity financing may be dilutive to our shareholders, new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our shares of Common stock. Debt or equity financing may subject us to restrictive covenants and significant interest costs. If we obtain financing for our near term operations and product development,funding through a strategic collaboration or licensing arrangement, we may require additional capital beyond the near term.be required to relinquish our rights to our product or marketing territories. If we are unable to raise capital when needed,obtain the financing necessary to support our business, financial condition and results of operations, wouldwe may be materially adversely affected, and we could be forcedrequired to defer, reduce or discontinueeliminate certain planned expenditures or significantly curtail our operations.

Page 9


eWellness isWe are an early stage company with a going concern qualification to our financial statements and a short operating history andpursue a relatively new business model in an emerging and rapidly evolving market, which makes it difficult to evaluate itsour future prospects.

eWellness isWe are an early stage company with a short operating history and pursue a relatively new business model in an emerging and rapidly evolving market, which makes it difficult to evaluate its future prospects; as a pre-revenue, early stage entity, it is subject to all of the risks inherent in a young business enterprise, such as, among other things, lack of market recognition and limited banking and financial relationships. As a result, we have little operating history to aid in assessing future prospects. We will encounter risks and difficulties as an early stage company in a new and rapidly evolving market. We may not be able to successfully address these risks and difficulties, which could materially harm our business and operating results.

Our financial statements as of December 31, 20142016 were prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. The independent registered public accounting firm that audited our 20142016 financial statements, in their report, included an explanatory paragraph referring to our recurring losses since inception and expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on our ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiencies, reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, to generate revenue.

9

We may be subject to liability for failure to comply with Rule 419 under the Securities Act.

We may be subject to liability for failure to comply with Rule 419 under the Securities Act. Prior to our acquisition of eWellness Corporation, we did not technically comply with the requirements of Rule 419 under the Securities Act. We previously offered for sale in a direct public offering 1,000,000 shares of our commonCommon stock, pursuant to Rule 419 of the Securities Act (the “419 Transaction”"419 Transaction") and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-181440) that was declared effective by the SEC on September 14, 2012 (the “419"419 Registration Statement”Statement"). We sold 1,000,000 shares of our commonCommon stock (the “Shares”"Shares") to investors at a price of $0.10 per share, for total subscription proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to the 419 Registration Statement. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust"Trust Account Balance”Balance"). Prior to the Share Exchange, we were considered a “blank check”"blank check" company and a “shell”"shell" company and therefore, needed to fully comply with Rule 419. Among other things, Rule 419 requires that we deposit the securities being offered and proceeds of the offering contemplated by the 419 Registration Statement into an escrow or trust account pending the execution of an agreement for an acquisition or merger. If a consummated acquisition meeting the requirements of Rule 419 did not occur by a date 18 months after the September 14, 2012 effective date of the 419 Registration Statement, Rule 419(e)(2)(iv) requires a blank check company to return the funds held in the escrow account to all investors who participated in the offering within five (5) business days2. When we did not complete the Share Exchange by March 18, 2014, rather than physically return the funds, we gave the investors who participated in the financing that was initially conducted pursuant to Rule 419, the right to have their funds returned or use their funds to purchase the same shares in a private offering to be conducted pursuant to Rule 506(b) of the Securities Act; all of the investors directed us to use their respective funds for the private placement. Regardless, after various comments and discussions with the SEC’sSEC's staff within the division of corporate finance, it seems that such constructive compliance with Rule 419 is not permissible and we should have physically returned the investors’investors' funds when the Share Exchange was not completed by March 18, 2014. Ultimately, although we responded to all of the comments, the SEC continued to have concerns about the issues it raised and terminated its review of the relevant Form 8-K without clearing all of the comments and stated it would take further steps its deems necessary. Consequently, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Page 10


Risks Related to our ProductsPlatform and Development of our Business

Our telemedicine platform is new and has only limited operation experience.

eWellness’The Company has developed and tested its unique telemedicine platformwww.phzio.comwww.PHZIO that is a Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”("PHZIO program") to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic.

Our success is currently dependent upon our ability to maintain and develop Mr. Fogt’s relationship with other physicians.

Now that we are using our PHZIO.COMPHZIO platform to generate our success, we are dependent upon our CEO’sCEO's ability to maintain his current relationship with other physicians and our collective ability to establish relationships with other physicians. If we cannot generate new relationships or current relationships do not translate into service contracts or license agreements for our PHZIO.comPHZIO platform, we may not have alternative streams of revenue and therefore we may need to cease operations until such time as we find an alternative provider or forever.

Our Platform may not be accepted in the marketplace.

Uncertainty exists as to whether our Platform will be accepted by the market without additional widespread PT or patient acceptance. A number of factors may limit the market acceptance of our Platform, including the availability of alternative products and services as well as the price of our Platform services relative to alternative products. There is a risk that PT or patient acceptance will be encouraged to continue to use other products and/or methods instead of ours. We are assuming that, notwithstanding the fact that our Platform is new in the market, PT or patient acceptance will elect to use our Platform because it will permit to safe valuable PT's time.

PT or patient needs to be persuaded that our Platform service is justified for the anticipated benefit, but there is no assurance that sufficient numbers of patients will be convinced to enable a successful market to develop for our Platform.

Our revenues will be dependent upon acceptance of our Platform product by the market. The failure of such acceptance will cause us to curtail or cease operations.

Our revenues are expected to come from our Platform. As a result, we will continue to incur operating losses until such time as revenues reach a mature level and we are able to generate sufficient revenues from our Platform to meet our operating expenses. There can be no assurance that PTs or patients will adopt our Platform. In the event that we are not able to market and significantly increase the number of PTs or patients that use our Platform, or if we are unable to charge the necessary prices, our financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.

Defects or malfunctions in our Platform could hurt our reputation, sales and profitability.

The acceptance of our Platform depends upon its effectiveness and reliability. Our Platform is complex and is continually being modified and improved, and as such may contain undetected defects or errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. To the extent that defects or errors cause our Platform to malfunction and our customers' use of our Platform is interrupted, our reputation could suffer and our potential revenues could decline or be delayed while such defects are remedied. We may also be subject to liability for the defects and malfunctions.

There can be no assurance that, despite our testing, errors will not be found in our Platform or new releases, resulting in loss of future revenues or delay in market acceptance, diversion of development resources, damage to our reputation, adverse litigation, or increased service, any of which would have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.

Page 11


Software failures, breakdowns in the operations of our servers and communications systems or the failure to implement system enhancements could harm our business.

Our success depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our servers and communications systems. A failure of our network or data gathering procedures could impede services, and could result in the loss of PT and patients. While all of our operations will have disaster recovery plans in place, they might not adequately protect us. Despite any precautions we take, damage from fire, floods, hurricanes, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, break-ins and similar events at our computer facilities could result in interruptions in the flow of data to our servers and from our servers to our clients. In addition, any failure by our computer environment to provide our required data communications capacity could result in interruptions in our service. In the event of a server failure, we could be required to transfer our client data collection operations to an alternative provider of server hosting services. Such a transfer could result in delays in our ability to deliver our products and services to our clients.

Additionally, significant delays in the planned delivery of system enhancements, improvements and inadequate performance of the systems once they are completed could damage our reputation and harm our business. Long-term disruptions in the infrastructure caused by events such as natural disasters, the outbreak of war, the escalation of hostilities and acts of terrorism, particularly involving cities in which we have offices, could adversely affect our businesses. Although, we plan to carry property and business interruption insurance for our business operations, our coverage might not be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur.

We face risks related to the storage of customers' and their end users' confidential and proprietary information.

Our Platform is designed to maintain the confidentiality and security of our patients' confidential and proprietary data that are stored on our server systems, which may include sensitive personal data. However, any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access to these data could expose us to liability for the loss of such information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and other possible liabilities as well as negative publicity. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are difficult to recognize and react to. We may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative or reactionary measures.

We might incur substantial expense to further develop our Platform which may never become sufficiently successful.

Our growth strategy requires the successful launch of our Platform. Although management will take every precaution to ensure that our Platform will, with a high degree of likelihood, achieve commercial success, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. The causes for failure of our Platform once commercialized can be numerous, including:

 ●market demand for our Platform proves to be smaller than we expect;
 ●further Platform development turns out to be more costly than anticipated or takes longer; our Platform requires significant adjustment post commercialization, rendering the Platform uneconomic or extending considerably the likely investment return period;·additional regulatory requirements may increase the overall costs of the development;·patent conflicts or unenforceable intellectual property rights; and PTs and clients may be unwilling to adopt and/or use our Platform.
 ●Compliance with changing regulations concerning corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses.

We are required to comply with certain provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and if we fail to comply in a timely manner, our business could be harmed and our stock price could decline.

Rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require an annual assessment of internal controls over financial reporting, and for certain issuers an attestation of this assessment by the issuer's independent registered public accounting firm. The standards that must be met for management to assess the internal controls over financial reporting as effective are evolving and complex, and require significant documentation, testing, and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards.

Page 12


We expect to incur expenses and to devote resources to Section 404 compliance on an ongoing basis. It is difficult for us to predict how long it will take or costly it will be to complete the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for each year and to remediate any deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we may not be able to complete the assessment and remediation process on a timely basis. In addition, although attestation requirements by our independent registered public accounting firm are not presently applicable to us, we could become subject to these requirements in the future and we may encounter problems or delays in completing the implementation of any resulting changes to internal controls over financial reporting. In the event that our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer determine that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective as defined under Section 404, we cannot predict how the market prices of our shares will be affected; however, we believe that there is a risk that investor confidence and share value may be negatively affected.

These and other new or changed laws, rules, regulations and standards are, or will be, subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity. As a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards are likely to continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Further, compliance with new and existing laws, rules, regulations and standards may make it more difficult and expensive for us to maintain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. Members of our board of directors and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified directors and executive officers, which could harm our business. We continually evaluate and monitor regulatory developments and cannot estimate the timing or magnitude of additional costs we may incur as a result.

We cannot be certain that we will obtain patents for our Platform and technology or that such patents will protect us from competitors.

We believe that our success and competitive position will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patents for our Platform, which is both costly and time consuming. We still are in the process to evaluate the patent potentials of our Platform. Patent Offices typically requires 12-24 months or more to process a patent application. There can be no assurance that any of our potential patent applications will be approved. However, we have decided to launch our Platform without patent protection. There can be no assurance that any potential patent issued or licensed to us will provide us with protection against competitive products, protect us against changes in industry trends which we have may not have anticipated or otherwise protect the commercial viability of our Platform, or that challenges will not be instituted against the validity or enforceability of any of our future patents or, if instituted, that such challenges will not be successful. The cost of litigation to uphold the validity of a patent and enforce it against infringement can be substantial. Even issued patents may later be modified or revoked by the Patent and Trademark Office or in legal proceedings. Patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy until the patent issues and, since publication of patents tends to lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that if we obtain patents for our product, we were the first creator of the inventions covered by a pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on such inventions.

Liability issues are inherent in the Healthcare industry and insurance is expensive and difficult to obtain, we may be exposed to large lawsuits.

Our business exposes us to potential liability risks, which are inherent in the Healthcare industry. While we will take precautions, we deem to be appropriate to avoid liability suits against us, there can be no assurance that we will be able to avoid significant liability exposure. Liability insurance for the Healthcare industry is generally expensive. We have obtained professional indemnity insurance coverage for our Platform. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain such coverage on acceptable terms, or that any insurance policy will provide adequate protection against potential claims. A successful liability claim brought against us may exceed any insurance coverage secured by us and could have a material adverse effect on our results or ability to continue our Platform.

Page 13


We depend upon reimbursement by third-party payers.

Substantially all of our revenues are anticipated to be derived from private third-party PT clinics that gain their revenue to pay our licensing fees from insurance payers. Initiatives undertaken by industry and government to contain healthcare costs affect the profitability of our licensee clinics. These payers attempt to control healthcare costs by contracting with healthcare providers to obtain services on a discounted basis. We believe that this trend will continue and may limit reimbursement for healthcare services. If insurers or managed care companies from whom we receive substantial payments were to reduce the amounts paid for services, our profit margins may decline, or we may lose patientsPT licensees if wethey choose not to renew our contracts with these insurers at lower rates. In addition, in certain geographical areas, our operations may be approved as providers by key health maintenance organizations and preferred provider plans; failure to obtain or maintain these approvals would adversely affect our financial results. Although we created a business plan that will enable us to achieve revenue based on current reimbursement policies, if our belief that the insurance industry is poised for change, to offer more reimbursement for the services we seek to provide is not realized, we may not achieve the success we predict and we may not be able to carry out all the plans we disclose herein related to telemedicine. Ultimately, a shift in thinking and a willingness to adapt to new physical therapy telemedicine services and reimbursement thereof by healthcare providers is needed for the successful integration of our PHZIO.COMPHZIO telemedicine platform in mainstream healthcare environments.

2Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. Here, the Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

10

We are currently contractually committedwill need to a 14 state exclusive supplyincrease the size of our organization, and distribution agreementmay experience difficulties in managing growth.

The Company entered into an exclusive supplyAt present, we are a small company. We expect to experience a period of expansion in headcount, infrastructure and distribution agreement with Millennium Healthcare, Inc., (“MHI”) covering 14 statesoverhead and anticipate that include: Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, in which the company is required to pay MHI a 20% fee on DMpt patient revenue generated in those states, in return for providing marketing and program billing services to the Company. To date, this contract has not been activated as our DMpt program has not commenced operations; additionally, MHI has shown little interest in our program. If at the time that our DMpt program commences operations and MHI has not used their best efforts to market and manage the billing of our program to various insurance carriers, then the Company may be in a position to cancel the contract with MHI and pursue other marketing and billing management relationships. Alternatively, if the company acts to engage other distribution companies within the covered 14 states, the Company mayfurther expansion will be required to includeaddress potential growth and market opportunities. Future growth will impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including the 20% MHI fee into anyneed to identify, recruit, maintain and integrate new arrangement or worse, may be prohibited from entering into any new engagement within any such states. If we cannot cancel the agreementmanagers. Our future financial performance and since there is not guarantee that any distribution or billing activity outside of the agreement between the Company and MHI within the 14 states will be permitted, we may be required to pay the contractual fees noted above or face strategic road blocks that hinder ourits ability to grow and succeed. Since neither party has takencompete effectively will depend, in part, on its ability to manage any steps to carry out the agreement, we may seek to terminate same, although there can be no guarantee the outcome of such efforts.

future growth effectively.

Dependence on Key Existing and Future Personnel

Our success will depend, to a large degree, upon the efforts and abilities of our officers and key management employees. The loss of the services of one or more of our key employees could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, as our business model is implemented, we will need to recruit and retain additional management and key employees in virtually all phases of our operations. Key employees will require a strong background in our industry. We cannot assure that we will be able to successfully attract and retain key personnel.

Currently, our management’smanagement's participation in our business and operations is limited

To date, we have been unable to offer cash compensation to our officers due to our lack of revenue. Accordingly, each of the Company’sCompany's executive officers maintain jobs outside of their position at eWellness. Although each of our executive officers have made preparations to devote their efforts, on a full timefull-time basis, towards our objectives once wecan afford executive compensation commensurate with that being paid in the marketplace, until such time, our officers will not devote their full time and attention to the operations of the Company. None of our officers have committed a specific portion of their time or an approximate number of hours per week in writing to the objectives of the company and no assurances can be given as to when we will be financially able to engage our officers on a full timefull-time basis and therefore, until such time, itit is possible that the inability of such persons to devote their full timefull-time attention to the Company may result in delays in progress toward implementing our business plan.

We operate in a highly competitive industry

WeAlthough we are not aware of any other Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Telemedicine Program precisely like ours, and targeting our specific population, we shall encounter competition from local, regional or national entities, some of which have superior resources or other competitive advantages.advantages in the larger physical therapy space. Intense competition may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We may also experience competition from companies in the wellness space. These competitors may be larger and more highly capitalized, with greater name recognition. We will compete with such companies on brand name, quality of services, level of expertise, advertising, product and service innovation and differentiation of product and services. As a result, our ability to secure significant market share may be impeded. Although we believe our DMptPHZIO services will enable us to service more patients than traditional physical therapy providers, if these more established offices or providers start offering similar services to ours, their name recognition or experience may enable them to capture a greater market share.

Page 14


Limited product testing and operations

We have built out the technology platform and video library necessary to execute our planned business strategy. Of course, there may be other factors that prevent us from successfully marketing a product including, but not limited to, our limited cash resources. Further, our proposed reimbursement plan and the eventual operating results could susceptible to varying interpretations by scientists, medical personnel, regulatory personnel, statisticians and others, which may delay, limit or prevent our executing our proposed business plan.

We face substantial competition, and others may discover, develop, acquire or commercialize productsbefore or more successfully than we do

We operate in a highly competitive environment. Our products compete with other products or treatments for diseases for which our products may be indicated. Other healthcare companies have greater clinical, research, regulatory and marketing resources than us. In addition, some of our competitors may have technical or competitive advantages for the development of technologies and processes. These resources may make it difficult for us to compete with them to successfully discover, develop and market new products.

We depend upon the cultivation and maintenance of relationships with the physicians in our markets.

Our success is dependent upon referrals from physicians in the communities wethat our PT licensees will service and ourtheir ability to maintain good relations with these physicians and other referral sources. Physicians referring patients to ourtheir clinics are free to refer their patients to other therapy providers or to their own physician owned therapy practice. If weour PT licensees are unable to successfully cultivate and maintain strong relationships with physicians and other referral sources, our business may decrease and our net operating revenues may decline.

We also depend upon our ability to recruit and retain experienced physical therapists

Our future revenue generation is dependent upon referrals from physicians in the communities our clinics serve, and our ability to maintain good relations with these physicians. Our therapistsPT licensees are the front line for generating these referrals and we are dependent on their talents and skills to successfully cultivate and maintain strong relationships with these physicians. If wethey cannot recruit and retain our base of experienced and clinically skilled therapists, our business may decrease and our net operating revenues may decline.

Our revenues may fluctuate due to weather

We anticipate having a significantconsiderable number of clinicalPT licensees in locations in states that normally experience snow and ice during the winter months. Also, a significantconsiderable number of our clinics may be located in states along the Gulf Coast and Atlantic Coast, which are subject to periodic winter storms, hurricanes and other severe storm systems. Periods of severe weather may cause physical damage to our facilities or prevent our staff or patients from traveling to our clinics, which may cause a decrease in our future net operating revenues.

We may incur closure costs and losses

The competitive, economic or reimbursement conditions in the markets in which we operate may require us to reorganize or to close certain clinical locations. In the event a clinic is reorganized or closed, we may incur losses and closure costs.losses. The closure costs and losses may include, but are not limited to, lease obligations, severance, and write-down or write-off of intangible assets.

Certain of our internal controls, particularly as they relate to billings and cash collections, are largely decentralized at our clinic locations

Our future clinicalPT licensees' operations are largely decentralized and certain of our internal controls, particularly the processing of billings and cash collections, occur at the clinic level. Taken as a whole, we believe our future internal controls for these functions at our PT licensees clinical facilities will be adequate. Our controls for billing and collections largely depend on compliance with our written policies and procedures and separation of functions among clinic personnel. We also intend to maintain corporate level controls, including an audit compliance program, that are intended to mitigate and detect any potential deficiencies in internal controls at the clinic level. The effectiveness of these controls to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the level of compliance with our policies and procedures deteriorates.

Page 15


Risks Related to Regulation

Our products may be subject to product liability legal claims, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Certain of our products provide applications that relate to patient clinical information. Any failure by our products to provide accurate and timely information concerning patients, their medication, treatment and health status, generally, could result in claims against us which could materially and adversely impact our financial performance, industry reputation and ability to market new system sales. In addition, a court or government agency may take the position that our delivery of health information directly, including through licensed practitioners, or delivery of information by a third partythird-party site that a consumer accesses through our websites, exposes us to assertions of malpractice, other personal injury liability, or other liability for wrongful delivery/handling of healthcare services or erroneous health information. We anticipate that in the future we will maintain insurance to protect against claims associated with the use of our products as well as liability limitation language in our end-user license agreements, but there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage or contractual language would adequately cover any claim asserted against us. A successful claim brought against us in excess of or outside of our insurance coverage could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even unsuccessful claims could result in our expenditure of funds for litigation and management time and resources.

Certain healthcare professionals who use our Cloud-based products will directly enter health information about their patients including information that constitutes a record under applicable law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual obligations, govern collection, dissemination, use and confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information, including:

state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
contracts with clients and partners;
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
Medicaid laws;
the HIPAA and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing Administration; and
Health Care Financing Administration standards for Internet transmission of health data.

HIPAA establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal privacy and security standards for the use and protection of Protected Health Information. Any failure by us or by our personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may result in a material liability to us.

Although we have systems and policies in place for safeguarding Protected Health Information from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not preclude claims against us for alleged violations of applicable requirements. Also, third party sites and/or links that consumers may access through our web sites may not maintain adequate systems to safeguard this information, or may circumvent systems and policies we have put in place. In addition, future laws or changes in current laws may necessitate costly adaptations to our policies, procedures, or systems.

There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to product liability claims, that such claims will not result in liability in excess of our insurance coverage, that our insurance will cover such claims or that appropriate insurance will continue to be available to us in the future at commercially reasonable rates. Such product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

There is significant uncertainty in the healthcare industry in which we operate, and we are subject to the possibility of changing government regulation, which may adversely impact our business, financialcondition and results of operations.

The healthcare industry is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences that may affect the procurement processes and operation of healthcare facilities. During the past several years, the healthcare industry has been subject to an increase in governmental regulation of, among other things, reimbursement rates and certain capital expenditures.

Page 16


Recently enacted public laws reforming the U.S. healthcare system may have an impact on our business. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590; Public Law 111-148) (“PPACA”("PPACA") and The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872) (the “Reconciliation Act”"Reconciliation Act"), which amends the PPACA (collectively the “Health"Health Reform Laws”Laws"), were signed into law in March 2010. The Health Reform Laws contain various provisions which may impact us and our patients. Some of these provisions may have a positive impact, while others, such as reductions in reimbursement for certain types of providers, may have a negative impact due to fewer available resources. Increases in fraud and abuse penalties may also adversely affect participants in the health care sector, including us.

Various legislators have announced that they intend to examine further proposals to reform certain aspects of the U.S. healthcare system. Healthcare providers may react to these proposals, and the uncertainty surrounding such proposals, by curtailing or deferring investments, including those for our systems and related services. Cost-containment measures instituted by healthcare providers as a result of regulatory reform or otherwise could result in a reduction of the allocation of capital funds. Such a reduction could have an adverse effect on our ability to sell our systems and related services. On the other hand, changes in the regulatory environment have increased and may continue to increase the needs of healthcare organizations for cost-effective data management and thereby enhance the overall market for healthcare management information systems. We cannot predict what effect, if any, such proposals or healthcare reforms might have on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As existing regulations mature and become better defined, we anticipate that these regulations will continue to directly affect certain of our products and services, but we cannot fully predict the effect at this time.now. We have taken steps to modify our products, services and internal practices as necessary to facilitate our compliance with the regulations, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in a timely or complete manner. Achieving compliance with these regulations could be costly and distract management’smanagement's attention and divert other company resources, and any noncompliance by us could result in civil and criminal penalties.

Developments of additional federal and state regulations and policies have the potential to positively or negatively affect our business. Our software is not anticipated to be considered a medical device by the FDA. Yet, if it were, it could be subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”("FDA") as a medical device. Such regulation could require the registration of the applicable manufacturing facility and software and hardware products, application of detailed record-keeping and manufacturing standards, and FDA approval or clearance prior to marketing. An approval or clearance requirement could create delays in marketing, and the FDA could require supplemental filings or object to certain of these applications, the result of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be subject to false or fraudulent claim laws

There are numerous federal and state laws that forbid submission of false information or the failure to disclose information in connection with submission and payment of physician claims for reimbursement. In some cases, these laws also forbid abuse of existing systems for such submission and payment. Any failure of our services to comply with these laws and regulations could result in substantial liability including, but not limited to, criminal liability, could adversely affect demand for our services and could force us to expend significant capital, research and development and other resources to address the failure. Errors by us or our systems with respect to entry, formatting, preparation or transmission of claim information may be determined or alleged to be in violation of these laws and regulations. Determination by a court or regulatory agency that our services violate these laws could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, invalidate all or portions of some of our client contracts, require us to change or terminate some portions of our business, require us to refund portions of our services fees, cause us to be disqualified from serving clients doing business with government payers and have an adverse effect on our business.

Page 17


We are subject to the Stark Law, which may result in significant penalties

Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. § 1395nn) (the “Stark Law”"Stark Law") prohibit referrals by a physician of “designated"designated health services”services" which are payable, in whole or in part, by Medicare or Medicaid, to an entity in which the physician or the physician’sphysician's immediate family member has an investment interest or other financial relationship, subject to several exceptions. Unlike the Fraud and Abuse Law, the Stark Law is a strict liability statute. Proof of intent to violate the Stark Law is not required. Physical therapy services are among the “designated"designated health services”services". Further, the Stark Law has application to the Company’sCompany's management contracts with individual physicians and physician groups, as well as, any other financial relationship between us and referring physicians, including any financial transaction resulting from a clinic acquisition. The Stark Law also prohibits billing for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. Several states have enacted laws similar to the Stark Law. These state laws may cover all (not just Medicare and Medicaid) patients. Many federal healthcare reform proposals in the past few years have attempted to expand the Stark Law to cover all patients as well. As with the Fraud and Abuse Law, we consider the Stark Law in planning our clinics, marketing and other activities, and believe that our operations are in compliance with the Stark Law. If we violate the Stark Law, our financial results and operations could be adversely affected. Penalties for violations include denial of payment for the services, significant civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

If our products fail to comply with evolving government and industry standards and regulations,we may have difficulty selling our products

We may be subject to additional federal and state statutes and regulations in connection with offering services and products via the Internet. On an increasingly frequent basis, federal and state legislators are proposing laws and regulations that apply to Internet commerce and communications. Areas being affected by these regulations include user privacy, pricing, content, taxation, copyright protection, distribution, and quality of products and services. To the extent that our products and services are subject to these laws and regulations, the sale of our products and services could be harmed.

We incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company and our management willhave to devote substantial time to public company compliance obligations

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”("SEC"), and the stock exchange, has imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance requirements and any new requirements that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 may impose on public companies. Moreover, these rules and regulations, along with compliance with accounting principles and regulatory interpretations of such principles, have increased and will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and have made and will continue to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or our board committees, or as executive officers. We will evaluate the need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting and financial knowledge. We estimate the additional costs we expect to be incurred as a result of being a public company to be up to $500,000 annually.

Part of the requirements as a public company will be to document and test our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company.

Page 18


Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and to effectively prevent fraud. We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, which is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

We cannot assure you that we will not, in the future, identify areas requiring improvement in our internal control over financial reporting. We cannot assure that the measures we will take to remediate any areas in need of improvement will be successful or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future as we continue our growth. If we are unable to maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures, it could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, result in the restatement of our financial statements, harm our operating results, subject us to regulatory scrutiny and sanction, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on the market price for shares of our common stock.

Risks Relating to Our Securities

There is not now,a limited market for our common stock, and there may never be, an active market for our common stock and we cannot assure you that the common stock will becomeremain liquid or that it will continue to be listed on a securities exchangeexchange..

There currently is no market for our common stock. We plan to list ourOur common stock as soon as practicable followingis listed on the effective date of this Registration Statement. However, we cannot assure that we will be able to meetOTCQB exchange and trades under the initial listing standards of any stock exchange, or that we will be able to maintain any such listing.symbol "EWLL". An investor may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of the common stock and trading of our common stock may be extremely sporadic. For example, several days may pass before any shares may be traded. A more active market for the common stock may never develop. In addition, if we fail to meet the criteria set forth in SEC regulations, various requirements would be imposed by law on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Consequently, such regulations may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling the common stock, which may further affect its liquidity. This would also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital.

We cannot assure you that following the effective date of this Registration Statement, our common stock will be listed on NASDAQ or any other securities exchange; and if listed we may be subject to penny stock rules.

Following the effective date of this Registration Statement, we shall seek the listing of our common stock on NASDAQ or the American Stock Exchange. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to meet the initial listing standards of either, or any other stock exchange, or that we will be able to maintain a listing of common stock on either of those or any other stock exchange. Until our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ or another stock exchange, we expect that our common stock will continue to be eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, another over-the-counter quotation system, or on the “pink"pink sheets," where our stockholders may find it more difficult to dispose of shares or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock.

Our Common stock is subject to the "Penny Stock" rules of the SEC and the trading market in our stock is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment.

In addition, after such listing, our securities may be classified as penny stock. The SECSecurities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny"penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, whose securities are admittedsubject to quotation but do not trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market or on a national securities exchange.certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require deliveryrequire:

That a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and
The broker or dealer receives from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a document to investors stating the risks, special suitability inquiry, regular reporting and other requirements. Pricesperson's account for transactions in penny stocks, are often not available and investors are often unablethe broker or dealer must:

Obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
Make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

Page 19


The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to sell this stock. Consequently, such ruleany transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

Sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
That the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling our common stock, whichbe less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may further affect its liquidity. This would also make it more difficult for usinvestors to raise additional capital followingdispose of our Common stock and cause a business combination.decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also must be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA") sales practice requirements may limit a shareholder's ability to buy and sell our common stock.

In addition to the "penny stock" rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our Common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Our stock is thinly traded, sale of your holding may take a considerable amount of time.

The shares of our common stock are thinly-traded on the OTCQB Market, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. Consequently, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained. Due to these conditions, we can give you no assurance that you will be able to sell your shares at or near bid prices or at all if you need money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.

Shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market.

From time to time, certain of our stockholders may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of common stock by means of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, subject to certain limitations. In general, pursuant to amended Rule 144, non-affiliate stockholders may sell freely after six months subject only to the current public information requirement. Affiliates may sell after six months subject to the Rule 144 volume, manner of sale (for equity securities), current public information and notice requirements. Any substantial sales of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

If we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, the price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

Our internal control over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions that could require correction or remediation, the disclosure of which may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. We are required to establish and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to establish those controls, or any failure of those controls once established, could adversely affect our public disclosures regarding our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, management's assessment of internal controls over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal controls over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors. Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure of management's assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

Our share price could be volatile and our trading volume may fluctuate substantially.

The price of our common shares has been and may in the future continue to be extremely volatile, with the sale price fluctuating from a low of $0.01 to a high of $4.00 since trading began in 2016. Many factors could have a significant impact on the future price of our common shares, including:

our inability to raise additional capital to fund our operations;
our failure to successfully implement our business objectives and strategic growth plans;
compliance with ongoing regulatory requirements;
market acceptance of our product;
changes in government regulations; and
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial and operating results; and the degree of trading liquidity in our common shares.

Page 20


Our annual and quarterly results may fluctuate, which may cause substantial fluctuations in our common stock price.

Our annual and quarterly operating results may in the future fluctuate significantly depending on factors including the timing of purchase orders, new product releases by us and other companies, gain or loss of significant customers, price discounting of our product, the timing of expenditures, product delivery requirements and economic conditions. Revenues related to our product are required to be recognized upon satisfaction of all applicable revenue recognition criteria. The recognition of revenues from our product is dependent on several factors, including, but not limited to, the terms of any license agreement and the timing of implementation of our products by our customers.

Any unfavorable change in these or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our operating results for a particular quarter or year, which may cause downward pressure on our Common stock price. We expect quarterly and annual fluctuations to continue for the foreseeable future.

We are subject to compliance with securities law, which exposes us to potential liabilities, including potential rescission rights.

We have offered and sold our common stock to investors pursuant to certain exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as those of various state securities laws. The basis for relying on such exemptions is factual; that is, the applicability of such exemptions depends upon our conduct and that of those persons contacting prospective investors and making the offering. We have not received a legal opinion to the effect that any of our prior offerings were exempt from registration under any federal or state law. Instead, we have relied upon the operative facts as the basis for such exemptions, including information provided by investors themselves.

If any prior offering did not qualify for such exemption, an investor would have the right to rescind its purchase of the securities if it so desired. It is possible that if an investor should seek rescission, such investor would succeed. A similar situation prevails under state law in those states where the securities may be offered without registration in reliance on the partial preemption from the registration or qualification provisions of such state statutes. If investors were successful in seeking rescission, we would face severe financial demands that could adversely affect our business and operations. Additionally, if we did not in fact qualify for the exemptions upon which it has relied, we may become subject to significant fines and penalties imposed by the SEC and state securities agencies.

The availability of a large number of authorized but unissued shares of common stock may, upon their issuance, lead to dilution of existing stockholders

We are authorized to issue 400,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of which, as of April 7, 2017, 95,287,581 shares of Common stock were issued and outstanding. Additional shares may be issued by our board of directors without further stockholder approval. The issuance of large numbers of shares, possibly at below market prices, is likely to result in substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders. In addition, issuances of large numbers of shares may adversely affect the market price of our Common stock.

Our Articles of Incorporation authorizes 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share of none are issued. The board of directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of unissued shares of preferred stock in one or more series, and to fix the number of shares and to determine the rights, preferences and privileges thereof. Accordingly, the board of directors may issue preferred stock which may convert into large numbers of shares of common stock and consequently lead to further dilution of other shareholders.

We have never paid cash dividends and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common shares. We currently plan to retain any earnings to finance the growth of our business rather than to pay cash dividends. Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our financial condition, results of operations and capital requirements, as well as other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

The Nevada Revised Statute contains provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, prevent attempts to replace or remove current management and reduce the market price of our stock.

Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue up to ten million shares of "blank check" preferred stock. As a result, without further stockholder approval, the board of directors has the authority to attach special rights, including voting and dividend rights, to this preferred stock. With these rights, preferred stockholders could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of the NRS. Depending on the number of residents in the state of Nevada who own our shares, we could be subject to the provisions of Sections 78.378 et seq. of the Nevada Revised Statutes which, unless otherwise provided in the Company's articles of incorporation or by-laws, restricts the ability of an acquiring person to obtain a controlling interest of 20% or more of our voting shares. Our articles of incorporation and by-laws do not contain any provision which would currently keep the change of control restrictions of Section 78.378 from applying to us.

Page 21


We are subject to the provisions of Sections 78.411 et seq. of the Nevada Revised Statutes. In general, this statute prohibits a publicly held Nevada corporation from engaging in a "combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the combination or the transaction by which the person became an interested stockholder is approved by the corporation's board of directors before the person becomes an interested stockholder. After the expiration of the three-year period, the corporation may engage in a combination with an interested stockholder under certain circumstances, including if the combination is approved by the board of directors and/or stockholders in a prescribed manner, or if specified requirements are met regarding consideration. The term "combination" includes mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to certain exceptions, an "interested stockholder" is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years did own, 10% or more of the corporation's voting stock. A Nevada corporation may "opt out" from the application of Section 78.411 et seq. through a provision in its articles of incorporation or by-laws. We have not "opted out" from the application of this section.

Our stock price and ability to finance may be adversely affected by our outstanding convertible securities and warrants.

Sales of the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and upon conversion of our convertible securities, would likely have a depressive effect on the market price of our common stock. Further, the existence of, and/or potential exercise or conversion of all or a portion of these securities, create a negative and potentially depressive effect on our stock price because investors recognize that they “over hang”"over hang" the market at this time. As a result, the terms on which we may obtain additional financing during the period any of these warrants or convertible securities remain outstanding may be adversely affected by the existence of such warrants and convertible securities.

Insiders have substantial control over us, and they could delay or prevent a change in our corporate control even if our other stockholders wanted it to occur.

Our executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 65% of our outstanding common stock at August 21 , 2015. These stockholders are able to control all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This could delay or prevent an outside party from acquiring or merging with us, or other business consolidation even if our other stockholders wanted it to occur; it may also discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer for our common stock, which may further affect its liquidity.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.

We currently intend to retain any earnings to support our growth strategy and may begin paying dividends in late 2015, although that is not guaranteed.

We intend to issue more shares to raise capital, which will result in substantial dilution.

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Any additional financings effected by us may result in the issuance of additional securities without stockholder approval and the substantial dilution in the percentage of common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Moreover, the common stock issued in any such transaction may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm’s-length basis by our management, resulting in an additional reduction in the percentage of common stock held by our current stockholders. Our board of directors has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional shares of common stock or preferred stock are issued in connection with a financing, dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights of the holder of common stock might be materially and adversely affected.

Our publicly filed reports are subject to review by the SEC, and any significant changes or amendments required as a result of any such review may result in material liability to us and may have a material adverse impact on the trading price of the Company’sCompany's common stock.

The reports of publicly traded companies are subject to review by the SEC from time to time for the purpose of assisting companies in complying with applicable disclosure requirements, and the SEC is required to undertake a comprehensive review of a company’scompany's reports at least once every three years under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SEC reviews may be initiated at any time. We could be required to modify, amend or reformulate information contained in prior filings as a result of an SEC review. Any modification, amendment or reformulation of information contained in such reports could be significant and result in material liability to us and have a material adverse impact on the trading price of the Company’sCompany's common stock.

16

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The selected financial information set forth below is derived from our unaudited statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 and the audited financial statements for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, which appears elsewhere in this prospectus commencing on page 48 and which include footnotes required under generally accepted accounting principles. Prospective investors are urged to carefully review such detailed financial statements in their entirety.

  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
       
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Executive compensation $372,000  $372.000 
General and administrative  96,872   109,700 
Professional fees  240,062   174,248 
Research and development - related party  -   30 
         
Total Operating Expenses  708,934   656,038 
         
Loss from Operations  (708,934)  (656,038)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Gain from extinguishment of debt  11,323   - 
Interest income  -   7 
Interest expense, related parties  (1,957)  (608)
Interest expense  (51,391)  (184)
         
Loss before Income Taxes  (750,959)  (656,823)
         
Income tax expense  -   - 
         
Net Loss $(750,959) $(656,823)

17

  For Year Ended 
  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 
       
TOTAL REVENUE $-  $- 
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Executive compensation  744,000   423,000 
General and administrative  231,124   40,930 
Professional fees  259,856   - 
Contingent liability expense  90,000   - 
Research and development - related party  30   2,706 
         
Total Operating Expenses  1,325,010   466,636 
         
Loss from Operations  (1,325,010)  (466,636)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Gain on extinguishment of debt  1,200   - 
Interest income  7   - 
Interest expense, related parties  (2,708)  - 
Interest expense  (13,074)  - 
         
Loss before Income Taxes  (1,339,585)  (466,636)
         
Income tax expense  -   - 
         
Net Loss $(1,339,585) $(466,636)

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any net proceeds from salesthe sale of shares of our common stock being registeredCommon Stock by the selling stockholders. However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of shares of our Common Stock pursuant to our exercise of the put right offered by Tangiers Global, LLC. We will use these proceeds for resalegeneral corporate and working capital purposes and acquisitions or assets, businesses or operations or for other purposes that our board of directors, in its good faith, deems to be in the best interest of the Company.

We will pay for expenses of this offering, except that the selling stockholder will pay any broker discounts or commissions or equivalent expenses and expenses of its legal counsel applicable to the sale of its shares.

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

The Selling Shareholders may sell their shares in the over-the-counter market or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market price, or at negotiated prices. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of Common Stock by the Selling Stockholders namedShareholders.

DILUTION

The sale of our Common Stock to Tangiers in this prospectus.accordance with the Investment Agreement dated February 14, 2017 will have a dilutive impact on our stockholders. As a result, our net loss per share could increase in future periods and the market price of our Common Stock could decline. In addition, the lower our stock price is at the time we exercise our put option, the more shares of our Common Stock we will have to issue to Tangiers in order to drawdown pursuant to the Investment Agreement. If our stock price decreases during the pricing period, then our existing stockholders would experience greater dilution.

 

Investment Agreement with Tangiers Global, LLC

On February 14, 2017, we entered into an Investment Agreement with Tangiers. Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement, Tangiers committed to purchase up to $5,000,000 of our Common Stock over a period of up to 36 months. From time to time during the 36 month period commencing from the effectiveness of the registration statement, we may deliver a put notice to Tangiers which states the number of shares of Common Stock that we intend to sell to Tangiers on a date specified in the put notice. The maximum share number per notice must be no more than 200% of the average daily trading volume of our Common Stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately prior to date of the applicable put notice and such amount must not exceed an accumulative amount of $250,000. The minimum put amount is $5,000. The purchase price per share to be paid by Tangiers will be the 80% of the of lowest trading prices of the Common Stock during the 5 trading days including and immediately following the date on which put notice is delivered to Tangiers.

Page 22


In connection with the Investment Agreement with Tangiers, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with Tangiers, pursuant to which we agreed to use our best efforts to, within 15 days of filing the Company's Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2016, file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement, covering the resale of 9,519,229 shares of our Common Stock underlying the Investment Agreement with Tangiers.

In connection with the Investment Agreement, the Company also issued a fixed convertible promissory note to Tangiers for the principal sum of $100,000 convertible at $0.20 bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum maturing in September 2017. In addition, the Company issued a fixed convertible promissory note to Tangiers for the principal sum of $275,000 convertible at $0.20 bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum maturing in February 2018. The Company issued 68,750 warrants exercisable at $0.25 and expiring in 2022.

The 9,519,229 shares being offered pursuant to this Prospectus represent 9.99% of the shares issued and outstanding, assuming that the selling stockholders will sell all of the shares offered for sale. Tangiers has agreed to refrain from holding an amount of shares which would result in Tangiers owning more than 9.99% of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock at any one time.

The Investment Agreement with Tangiers is not transferable and any benefits attached thereto may not be assigned.

At an assumed purchase price of $0.072, we will be able to receive up to $685,384 in gross proceeds, assuming the sale of all of the 9,519,229 shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the Investment Agreement with Tangiers, being the number of shares being offered pursuant to this Prospectus. We may however,be required to further increase our authorized shares in order to receive proceeds fromthe entire purchase price.

There are substantial risks to investors as a result of the issuance of shares of our commonCommon Stock under the Investment Agreement with Tangiers. These risks include dilution of stockholders' percentage ownership, significant decline in our stock uponprice and our inability to draw sufficient funds when needed.

We intend to sell Tangiers periodically our Common Stock under the exerciseInvestment Agreement and Tangiers will, in turn, sell such shares to investors in the market at the market price. This may cause our stock price to decline, which will require us to issue increasing numbers of Common Shares to Tangiers to raise the same amount of funds, as our stock price declines.

The proceeds received from any "puts" tendered to Tangiers under the Investment Agreement will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes and acquisitions or assets, businesses or operations or for other purposes that our board of directors, in its good faith deem to be in the best interest of the Warrants.Company.

 

IfWe may have to increase the number of our authorized shares in order to issue the shares to Tangiers if we reach our current amount of authorized shares of Common Stock. Increasing the number of our authorized shares will require board and stockholder approval. Accordingly, because our ability to draw down any amounts under the Investment Agreement with Tangiers is subject to a number of conditions, there is no guarantee that we will be able to draw down any portion or all of the outstanding Warrants were exercised for cash atproceeds of $5,000,000 under the Investment Agreement with Tangiers. 

SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS

This Prospectus relates to the resale of 9,519,229 shares of our Common Stock, issuable to Tangiers (defined below).

This Prospectus relates to the resale of up to 9,519,229 shares of the Common Shares, issuable to Tangiers, a selling stockholder pursuant to a "put right" under an exerciseInvestment Agreement, dated February 14, 2017, that we entered into with Tangiers. The Investment Agreement permits us to "put" up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) in shares of our Common Stock to Tangiers over a period of up to thirty-six (36) months or until $5,000,000 of such shares have been "put."

The selling stockholder may offer and sell, from time to time, any or all of shares of our Common Stock to be sold to Tangiers under the Investment Agreement dated February 14, 2017.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by the selling stockholder as of April 7, 2017 and the number of shares of our Common Stock being offered pursuant to this Prospectus. We believe that the selling stockholder has sole voting and investment powers over its shares.

Because the selling stockholder may offer and sell all or only some portion of the 9,519,229 shares of our Common Stock being offered pursuant to this Prospectus, the numbers in the table below representing the amount and percentage of these shares of our Common Stock that will be held by the selling stockholder upon termination of the offering are only estimates based on the assumption that the selling stockholder will sell all of its shares of our Common Stock being offered in the offering.

The selling stockholder has not had any position or office, or other material relationship with us or any of our affiliates over the past three years.

Page 23


To our knowledge, the selling stockholder is not a broker-dealer or an affiliate of a broker-dealer. We may require the selling stockholder to suspend the sales of the shares of our Common Stock being offered pursuant to this Prospectus upon the occurrence of any event that makes any statement in this Prospectus or the related registration statement untrue in any material respect or that requires the changing of statements in those documents in order to make statements in those documents not misleading.

Name of Selling Stockholder Shares Owned by Selling Stockholder before the Offering(1) Total Shares Offered in the Offering Number of Shares to Be Owned by Selling Stockholder After the Offering and Percent of Total Issued and Outstanding Shares(1)
       # of Shares(2)  % of Class(2)
Tangiers Global, LLC(3)(4)  0  9,519,229 0 *
  
* Less than 1%
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to shares of Common Stock. Shares of Common Stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days, are counted as outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such options or warrants but are not counted as outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.
(2) We have assumed that the selling stockholder will sell all of the shares being offered in this offering.
(3) Justin Ederle has the voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by Tangiers Global, LLC. 
(4) As of January 1, 2017, Tangiers held 0 shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the Investment Agreement.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

This Prospectus relates to the resale of 9,152,965 shares of our Common Stock issuable to Tangiers Global, LLC (defined below).

This Prospectus relates to the resale of up to 9,152,965 shares of the Common Shares, issuable to Tangiers, the selling stockholder pursuant to a "put right" under an Investment Agreement, dated February 14, 2017, that we entered into with Tangiers. The Investment Agreement permits us to "put" up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) in shares of our Common Stock to Tangiers over a period of up to thirty-six (36) months or until $5,000,000 of such shares have been "put."

The Investment Agreement with Tangiers is not transferable.

At an assumed purchase price under the Investment Agreement of $0.072 (equal to 80% of the closing price of approximately $0.35 per share (subject to adjustment)our Common Stock of $0.09 on April 7, 2017), we couldwill be able to receive up to a total$685,384 in gross proceeds, assuming the sale of approximately $483,417. However, the holdersentire 9,519,229 Put Shares being registered hereunder pursuant to the Investment Agreement. At an assumed purchase price of Warrants$0.072 under the Investment Agreement, we would be required to register 59,925,222 additional shares to obtain the balance of $4,314,616 under the Investment Agreement. Due to the floating offering price, we are only obligatednot able to exercise such warrants for cash ifdetermine the underlying Warrant Shares have been registered for resaleexact number of shares that we will issue under a current registration statement declared effective by the SECInvestment Agreement.

The Selling Shareholders and any of its pledgees, donees, assignees and other successors-in-interest may, from time to time sell any or all of their shares of Common Stock on any market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. The Selling Shareholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:

Ÿordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits the purchaser;
Ÿblock trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal;
Ÿfacilitate the transaction;
Ÿpurchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
Ÿan exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
Ÿprivately negotiated transactions;
Ÿbroker-dealers may agree with the Selling Shareholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
Ÿthrough the writing of options on the shares
Ÿa combination of any such methods of sale; and
Ÿany other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The selling stockholder may also sell securities under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, if available, rather than under this Prospectus.

Broker-dealers engaged by the selling stockholder may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling stockholder (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.

Page 24


In connection with the sale of the securities or interests therein, the selling stockholder may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The selling stockholder may also sell securities short and deliver these securities to close out its short positions, or loan or pledge the securities to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The selling stockholder may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or create one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of securities offered by this Prospectus, which securities such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this Prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

Tangiers Global, LLC is an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act of 1933. We are required to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by us incident to the registration of the securities.

The selling stockholder will be subject to the Prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 including Rule 172 thereunder.

The resale securities will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale securities covered hereby may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale securities may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the Common Stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the selling stockholder will be subject to applicable provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of securities of the Common Stock by the selling stockholder or any other person. We will make copies of this Prospectus available to the selling stockholder and will inform it of the need to deliver a copy of this Prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act of 1933).

Page 25


DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED

General

We are authorized to issue an aggregate number of 420,000,000 shares of capital stock, $0.001 par value per share, consisting of 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock and 400,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share. As of April 7, 2017, none are issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

We are authorized to issue 400,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share. As of April 7, 2017, we had 95,287,581 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

Each share of Common Stock shall have one (1) vote per share for all purpose. Our Common Stock does not provide a preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there can beare no guarantee they will exercise any Warrants.redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights. Our Common Stock holders are not entitled to cumulative voting for election of Board of Directors.

Dividends

We intend to use any proceeds we may receive from the cash exercise of the Warrants for working capital and other general corporate purposes. There is no assurance that any or all of the Warrants will ever be exercised or that additional shares underlying the Warrants will be registered for resale.

MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK, DIVIDENDS ANDRELATED STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION

As of the date of this Statement, there is no public market for the Company’s common stock. This Registration Statement is a step toward creating a public market for our stock upon. However, there can be no assurance that a meaningful trading market will develop. The Company and its management make no representation about the present or future value of our common stock.

As of August 21 , 2015:

1.There are 4,854,405 outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or other instruments convertible into, common equity of the Company;
2.There are currently about 6,000,000 shares of our common stock eligible for sale pursuant to Rule 144; and,
3.Other than the stock registered under this Registration Statement, there is no stock that has been proposed to be publicly offered resulting in dilution to the current shareholders or that could have a material effect on the market price of our common equity.

Record Holders. As of August 21 , 2015, there were approximately 91 record holders of our common stock.

Dividend Policy. We have neither declared nornot paid any cash dividends on either preferred or common stock. For the foreseeableto our shareholders. The declaration of any future we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our preferred or common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will beis at the discretion of the Boardour board of Directorsdirectors and will be dependentdepends upon then existing conditions, including its financial condition, results of operations,our earnings, if any, our capital requirements contractual restrictions, business prospects,and financial position, our general economic conditions, and other factors thatpertinent conditions. It is our present intention not to pay any cash dividends in the Board of Directors considers relevant.

foreseeable future, but rather to reinvest earnings, if any, in our business operations.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation PlansWarrants.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had 9,116,190 warrants outstanding with an weighted average exercise price of $0.21.

Options

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had 20,250,000 options outstanding with an weighted average exercise price of $0.27.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The Company does not have any equity compensation plans or any individual compensation arrangements with respect to its common stock. The issuance of anytransfer agent of our common stockCommon Stock is withinVStock Transfer LLC, 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, NY 11598, (212) 828-8436.

Page 26


INTEREST OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

No expert or counsel named in this Prospectus as having prepared or certified any part of this Prospectus or having given an opinion upon the discretionvalidity of our Boardthe securities being registered or upon other legal matters in connection with the registration or Offering of Directors, which has the powerCommon Stock was employed on a contingency basis, or had, or is to issue anyreceive, in connection with the Offering, a substantial interest, direct or all of our authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and result of operations contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those describedindirect, in the “Risk Factors” sectionregistrant. Nor was any such person connected with the registrant as a promoter, managing or principal underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, or employee.

Thomas J. Craft, Jr., Esq., P.O. Box 4143, Tequesta FL 33469, will pass on the validity of the other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we, nor any other person, assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We are under no obligationCommon Stock being offered pursuant to update any of the forward-looking statements after the filing of this Registration Statement to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.Statement.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations relates to the operations and financial condition reported in theaudited financial statements of eWellness Healthcare Corporation for the quarter ending June 30 , 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and related notes included in this report.

Overview

eWellness is in the initial phase of developing a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”) to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic.

Initially, our focus was on patients with pre-diabetes conditions. However, we have broadened our focus to include overweight patients saddled with lower back pain and knee pain caused by tissue strain and inactivity. We alsodecided to launch our platform in Los Angeles instead of New York after Blue Shield of California reimbursed our physical therapy telemedicine. We were poised to launch our business in New York through a partnership with Millennium Healthcare, Inc. (“MHI”), but the partnership did not provide the results we were expecting. Additionally, management determined that relocating the Company’s operations closer to where the CEO and Chairman lived made the business more manageable and avoided time and monies lost due to travel. Management believes that by broadening the Company’s focus to include lower back pain and knee pain caused from excess weight, provides additional opportunities for success. The Company remains committed to servicing patients diagnosed as pre-diabetes as well.

As shown in the financial statements accompanying this Quarterly Report, the Company has had no revenues to date and has incurred only losses since its inception. The Company has had no operations and has been issued a “going concern” opinion from our accountants, based upon the Company’s reliance upon the sale of our common stock as the sole source of funds for our future operations.

The Company’s operations and corporate offices are located at 11825 Major Street Culver City, CA, 90230, with a telephone number of (310) 915-9700.

The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31 

Plan of Operations

During November and December 2014, we conducted a pilot study of our PHZIO.COM platform (the “PHZIO Study”), which included two men and six women aged between 33 and 56 years old over an eight week period; six were based in Los Angeles and two were based in Louisiana. Three of the participants were recruited from Craigslist and the rest were friends or family of the Company’s management team. The goals for each were to gain physical strength, stamina, balance and to lose weight. The study required each participant to attend exercise/therapy sessions three days per week from 6:30 am – 8:30 am during the trial period. Each patient attended every scheduled session and a few lost 15 pounds by the end of the study period; most said they improved their abdominal muscle strength and flexibility. Management believes these results will only improve with a longer therapy regimen period. Management is hopeful that a larger study with more patients over a six month period may produce meaningful data that would increase the likelihood for reimbursement for Medicaid plans.

The participants of our PHZIO Study indicated that they would prefer to interact with a physical therapy exercise program provided via telemedicine rather than travel to a facility; the majority agreed (88%) that they would not have travelled to our Culver City facilities to participate in a brick and mortar program and/or their attendance record would have declined. Additionally, all participants stated that they want to continue using the PHZIO.COM platform. They also indicated that having a physical therapist provide exercise instructions via the web was not a barrier to interacting with our PHZIO.COM program.

Our initial PHZIO.COM program is focused on patients that have back, hip and or knee pain and are overweight and may be pre-diabetic. Based upon the successful development of our initial PHZIO.COM platform, and with proper funding, we intend on expanding our on-line exercise system to include various other exercise programs including dietary guidance programs, hip replacement, orthopedic exercise programs and osteoporosis exercise programs.

We have developed various key performance indicators that we anticipate using to assess our business after operations are launched:

Patient Induction Rate. Our DMpt programs are 26 weeks long and start with the induction. Our patient induction rate will provide us a weekly direct understanding of how we are coordinating with the referring doctors and how efficiently we are managing the inductions; it will also give us a foundation for modeling the next six months of revenue.

Patient Attrition Rate. This indicator may be the single most important indicator of long term business outlook. The long term health of our business is directly linked to the long term health of our patients. If the patient stays with the program and does well, the probability of a health changing lifestyle shift is dramatically increased. When the patient stays with the program the Company’s business is rewarded with additional revenue. Furthermore, the increased success of each patient in our program enhances the insurance provider’s cost/benefits actuarial view of our service and thus motivates a better reimbursement schedule and more patients for us in the long run.

New Offices Per Month. This indicator will be useful in determining how fast or slow our distribution system will be growing. It will also provide us a predictive measure for resource requirements that will be emerging over the next six months.

Selling General and Administrative Expenses (SGA). Before even launching, we have received a high indication of interest in our service. We think the demand is warranted, but recognize that in the early stages of our services, we may experience bottlenecks in our ability to meet the demand for same. Under this type of environment it is critical to maintain awareness of the Company’s operational budget goals and how they are being met in our attempts to address demand. Regardless of our growth pace, it is critical to shareholder value that we are mindful of our operational spending.

Cashflow. Because the Company is “early stage” and launching with a minimum of capital, monitoring cashflow on a constant basis will be essential to growth.

We received a total of approximately $483,417 from the Private Placement. Upon receipt of at least $1.2million, the Company’s plans are to pursue the targets set forth below to achieve controlled operational break-even within four months and open up to 24 offices within 12 months after the close of such private financing and healthy profitability and growth thereafter. Specifically, it is our intention to launch our services the first month after funding into two pre-existing physician locations; for each of the 11 months thereafter, we intend to launch into two additional pre-existing physician offices each month, for a total of 24 offices within the first 12 months after receipt of adequate funding. If we do not receive the full $1.2 million, we will scale our plans back accordingly, in accordance with the priorities set forth below. We need at least $400,000 to carry out our 1st objective, make good on some of the outstanding liabilities that are to come due within the next 3-6 months as disclosed herein and become profitable. Until we receive it, the majority of our efforts will be geared towards obtaining sufficient financing to launch and complete our 1st objective.

Specifically, other than completing our 1st objective, we anticipate expending an aggregate of approximately $31,000 per month to compensate our executive officers to encourage them to devote more time to our Company, as we will be simultaneously launching and rolling out our operations in light of the received funds. Additionally, in light of its importance to our operations, we plan to pay the remaining $15,000 due on our license agreement with Bistromatics Corp. (See, “Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters And Certain Control Person”).

1stObjective: Activate the system and begin provisioning. The Company’s first objective is to complete the final activation of our DMpt system and begin provisioning our service to new patients in the Los Angeles metropolitan area.

a.New induction offices per month

i. Month 3 – (1) Offices per month

ii. Month 6 – (2) Offices per month

iii. Month 9 – (2) Offices per month

iv. Month 12 – (2) Offices per month

b.New patient inductions per office per month

i. Month 3 – (100) New patient inductions per office per month

ii. Month 6 – (100) New patient inductions per office per month

iii. Month 9 – (100) New patient inductions per office per month

iv. Month 12 – (100) New patient inductions per office per month

c.Total new patients per week across all offices

i. Month 3 – (100) Weekly new patients

ii. Month 6 – (250) Weekly new patients

iii. Month 9 – (400) Weekly new patients

iv. Month 12 – (621) Weekly new patients

We estimate that our anticipated launch cash expenditures for the first 90 days will be a total of $382,133 expended on SGA and operations, as detailed in the following chart. However, these expenditure estimates are created using operations modeling and may not accurately reflect the actual cost of launching our service and do not reflect collecting revenue. Furthermore, because our service in not currently operational and has never been deployed as designed, management may encounter expenditures not planed or foreseen and these estimates may be materially different than actual results.

Estimated Launch Cash Expenditures (90 Days)

Service Activation Month 1  Month 2  Month 3  3 Month Total 
Printing and Reproduction $1,300  $1,300  $1,300  $3,900 
Tech Info Sys Development 26,400  26,400  8,000  60,800 
Video Production 6,251  6,251  6,251  18,753 
Web-Site 3,541  3,541  3,541  10,623 
  $37,492  $37,492  $19,092  $94,076 
                 
SGA                
Fees - Bank $-  $-  $250  $250 
Executives & Employees 31,000  37,000  41,000  109,000 
Equipment Rental 3,715  3,795  3,904  11,414 
Factoring 0  3,561  11,781  15,342 
Insurance 9,632  10,534  11,136  31,302 
Interest -  -  -  - 
Internet Access 500  500  500  1,500 
Licenses and Permits 1,200  1,200  1,200  3,600 
Marketing, PR, Advertising 20,000  20,000  20,000  60,000 
Millennium & Dr Training 5,000  5,000  5,000  15,000 
Miscellaneous Expense 400  480  1,260  2,140 
Office Expenses 398  420  1,500  2,318 
Professional Fees 30,000  20,000  20,000  70,000 
Postage and Delivery 167  179  191  537 
Rent -  -  9,825  9,825 
Repairs 500  500  500  1,500 
Taxes 6,405  7,605  8,405  22,415 
Telephone 997  997  997  2,991 
Travel & Entertainment 4,980  8,019  10,000  22,999 
Utilities -  -  -  - 
  $114,894  $119,790  $147,449  $382,133 

Results of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $397,952 compared to $405,289 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 totaled $708,934 compared to $656,038 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Operating expenses increased for the six month period primarily as a result of an increase in professional fees for consulting services.

Interest Expense.

Interest expense, including interest expense–related parties, was $36,128 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. Interest expense, including expense-related parties was $53,348 and $792 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. The increase was related to costs of convertible debt with unrelated parties.

Net Loss

Net loss during the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $434,080 compared to $405,304 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Net loss during the six months ended June 30, 2015, totaled $750,959 compared to $656,823 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in the net loss is a result of increased operating and interest expenses as discussed above.

22

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013

Revenues

eWellness has reported $0 revenues from operations for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and December 31, 2013. 2015 included in this Prospectus and the Registration Statement have been audited by Haynie & Company, an independent registered public accounting firm, to the extent and for the periods set forth in their report appearing elsewhere herein and in the Registration Statement, and are included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We anticipatefiled this Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the beginningSEC under the Act with respect to the Common Stock offered by Selling Shareholders in this Prospectus. This Prospectus, which constitutes a part of revenue generationthe Registration Statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement or the exhibits and schedules filed therewith. For further information with respect to us and our Common Stock, please see the Registration Statement and the exhibits and schedules filed with the Registration Statement. Statements contained in this Prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or any other document that is filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statement is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. The Registration Statement, including its exhibits and schedules, may be inspected without charge at the public reference room maintained by the endSEC, located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of all or any part of the third quarterRegistration Statement may be obtained from such offices upon the payment of 2015.the fees prescribed by the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference room. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is www.sec.gov.

Page 27


DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

This Prospectus contains "forward-looking statements". All statements other than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking statements" for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements may include the words "may," "could," "estimate," "intend," "continue," "believe," "expect" or "anticipate" or other similar words. These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made.

Throughout this Prospectus references to "we", "our", "us", "eWellness", "the Company", and similar terms refer to eWellness Healthcare Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary.

Operating ExpensesCorporate Background

Total operating expenses increased to $1,325,010 for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $466,636 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase is a result of executive compensation and legal and accounting services expenses.

Net Loss

The Company incurred a net loss of $1,339,585 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with a net loss of $466,636 for the year ended December 31, 2013, which reflects an increase of $872,949. The increase is as a result of executive compensation and legal and accounting services expenses.

CONTINGENCIES

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arisingCompany was incorporated in the normal conductState of its business. The following isNevada on April 7, 2011 as Dignyte, Inc., to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions.

Following a descriptionshare exchange we completed in April 2014, pursuant to which eWellness Corporation, incorporated in Nevada in May 2013, became our wholly owned subsidiary, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing eWellness Corporation's historical businesses and proposed businesses.

On April 11, 2014, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 9,200,000 shares of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidentalrestricted Common Stock to the business.

shareholders of eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("eWellness"). In addition, the Company's former chief executive officer agreed to tender 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock back to the Company for cancellation and also to assign from his holdings an additional 2,500,000 shares to the shareholders of eWellness Corporation resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders. There were no warrants, options or other equity instruments granted and/or issued in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“("Rule 419”419") of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

However, Rule 419 required that the Shareshare exchange transaction (the "Share Exchange") contemplated by the Initial Exchange Agreement occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date.2014. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of bothand eWellness, the parties they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share"Share Exchange Agreement”Agreement") to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“("Form 8A”8A") to register our common stockCommon Stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offeringtransaction into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”"Converted Offering"),.

We also agreed to be conductedchange our name to eWellness Healthcare Corporation to more accurately reflect our new business and operations after the Share Exchange, which became effective as of April 25, 2014.

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

Fifty-two persons participatedterms of the Share Exchange Agreement, we purchased 100% of eWellness' Common Stock in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchaseexchange for 9,200,000 shares of our then outstanding shares of Common Stock and the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust accountshall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

As disclosed in the prior amendments to the Initial Form 8-K, we have filed the prior amendments in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to the Company’s potential violation of Rule 419. Although the Company has continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, based upon latest communications with the persons reviewing the Form 8-K, they do not agree with the assessments the Company presented to them. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

share exchange closed. As a result, eWellness became a wholly-owned subsidiary and its shareholders owned approximately 77% of these communicationsour then issued and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuantoutstanding Common Stock, after giving effect to the Rule 419 Offering. As a resultcancellation of 5,000,000 shares of our failure to comply with Rule 419,Common Stock held by the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure tostrictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating toCompany's former chief executive officer and the further assignment of his shares of Common Stock as described therein.

On July 22, 2015, our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divertwholly-owned subsidiary, eWellness Corporation, was merged into the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concernsCompany and, therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would haveno longer exists as a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption.In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.separate entity.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company had $4,604 and $900 cash as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Net cash used in operating activities was $287,169 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $117,020 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2015, was $295,080 compared to $130,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

We had not yet earned any revenues as of the period ending June 30, 2015. Our current cash position is not sufficient to fund our cash requirements during the next twelve months including operations and capital expenditures. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

We had assets at June 30, 2015 of $122,062. We will be reliant upon shareholder loans, private placements or public offerings of equity to fund any kind of operations, although there can be no guarantee we will be able to secure such finding on beneficial terms, if at all. We have secured no sources of loans.

We believe that anticipated cash flows from operations will be insufficient to satisfy our ongoing capital requirements. We are seeking financing in the form of equity capital in order to provide the necessary working capital. Our ability to meet our obligations and continue to operate as a going concern is highly dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing. We cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. We may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. In any of these events, we may be unable to implement our current plans which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial conditions and results of operations.

If we are not successful in generating sufficient liquidity from operations or in raising sufficient capital resources, on terms acceptable to us, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations liquidity and financial condition.

The independent auditors’ opinion expresses doubt about eWellness’ ability to continue as a going concern. The independent auditors report on eWellness’ December 31, 2014 and 2013 financial statements included in this Registration Statement states that the Company’s recurring losses, lack of revenues and operations and not having any positive operating cash flows since inception, raise substantial doubts about eWellness’ ability to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 of our Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Registration Statement.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

For a discussion of the Company’s changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure, please refer to the information set forth under Item 4.04 in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 2, 2015, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

BUSINESS

eWellness was incorporated in Nevada in May 2013. eWellness is an early-stage Los Angeles based corporation that seeks to provide a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Programs to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems, in addition to in-office sessions. Based on today’scurrent insurance landscape,reimbursement policies, we expect to generate our main revenue source shall comerevenues from in-office visits.

Recent Developments

In November 2014, we were advised by the California State Board of Physical Therapy ("CSBPT") that we could operate our Platform and bill patients insurance within the Association's rules in the state of California. That led us to induct sample patients into our Platform at our Culver City offices and complete an 8-week research study where we successfully billed for telemedicine visits for one of our patients who has Blue Shield insurance.

Page 28


On April 1, 2015, we entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy ("EPT"), a company owned by our CEO, pursuant to which EPT operate our Platform and offers it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. We will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the Platform and associated physical therapy treatments. On May 7, 2015, EPT inducted the first patient using our platform. The total (insurance reimbursed) monitored PHZIO visits in 2015 and 2016 was 1,928 visits that include: 2015: 699 patient visits (239 insurance reimbursed patient visits generating approximately $13,500 in gross revenue) and in 2016: 1,229 patient visits generating $1,496 (approximately 26 insurance reimbursed visits). These gross revenue figures were not sufficient to generate any gross sales for us. The average insurance reimbursement per PHZIO session in 2015 and 2016 was $56 (excluding co-payments). The wellness goals of our program are to graduate at least 80% of inducted patients through our 6-month program. Patients should expect to experience an average of a 20% reduction in BMI, a 4-inch reduction in waist size, weight loss of at least 20 pounds, significant overall improvement in balance, coordination, flexibility, strength, and lumbopelvic stability. Patients also should score better on Functional Outcomes Scales (Oswestry and LEFS), which indicates improved functional activity levels due to reduced low back, knee and hip pain.

On April 17, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Akash Bajaj, M.D., M.P.H pursuant to which Dr. Bajaj serve as a consultant and as the Chairman of the Company's Clinical Advisory Board.

On November 12, 2016, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. (the "Bistromatics Agreement"), a Company incorporated under the laws of Canada ("Bistromatics"). Pursuant to the Bistromatics Agreement, Bistromatics will provide operational oversight of the Company's Phzio System including development, content editing, client on boarding, clinic training, support & maintenance, billing, hosting and oversight and support of CRM and helpdesk system. The Company has agreed to pay a monthly base fee of $50,000 monthly until Bistromatics has successfully signed and collected the first monthly service fee for 100 Physical Therapy Clinics to start using our Platform. If and when Bistromatics provides the Company with evidence of the 100 Physical Therapy Clinics, the monthly service fee will extend to $100,000. Bistromatics will have the ability to convert any outstanding amounts that fall in arrears for 60 days into common stock at the same terms as the next round of financing or the Company's common stock market price, whichever is higher.

Investment Agreement with Tangiers Global, LLC

On February 14, 2017, we entered into an Investment Agreement with Tangiers. Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement, Tangiers committed to purchase up to $5,000,000 of our Common Stock over a period of up to 36 months. From time to time during the 36 month period commencing from the effectiveness of the registration statement, we may deliver a put notice to Tangiers which states the number of shares of Common Stock that we intend to sell to Tangiers on a date specified in the put notice. The maximum share number amount per notice must be no more than 200% of the average daily trading volume of our Common Stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately prior to date of the applicable put notice and such amount must not exceed an accumulative amount of $250,000. The minimum put amount is $5,000. The purchase price per share to be paid by Tangiers will be the 80% of the of lowest trading prices of the Common Stock during the 5 trading days including and immediately following the date on which put notice is delivered to Tangiers.

In connection with the Investment Agreement with Tangiers, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with Tangiers, pursuant to which we agreed to use our best efforts to, within 15 days of filing the Company's Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2016, file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement, covering the resale of 9,519,229 shares of our Common Stock.

The Company also issued two fixed convertible promissory notes to Tangiers as follows: (i) a fixed convertible promissory note for the principal sum of $100,000 convertible at $0.20 per share bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum maturing on September 10, 2017, (ii) a fixed convertible promissory note for the principal sum of $275,000 convertible at $0.20 per share bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum maturing on September 10, 2017; and 68,750 warrants exercisable at $0.25 and expiring in 2022.

The 9,519,229 shares being offered pursuant to this Prospectus represents 9.99% of the shares issued and outstanding, assuming that the selling stockholders will sell all of the shares offered for sale. Tangiers has agreed to refrain from holding an amount of shares which would result in Tangiers owning more than 9.99% of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock at any one time.

The Investment Agreement with Tangiers is not transferable and any benefits attached thereto may not be assigned.

At an assumed purchase price under the Investment Agreement of $0.072 (equal to 80% of the closing price of our Common Stock of $0.09 on April 7, 2017), we will be able to receive up to $685,384 in gross proceeds, assuming the sale of the entire 9,519,229 Put Shares being registered hereunder pursuant to the Investment Agreement. At an assumed purchase price of $0.072 under the Investment Agreement, we would be required to register 59,925,222 additional shares to obtain the balance of $4,314,616 under the Investment Agreement. Due to the floating offering price, we are not able to determine the exact number of shares that we will issue under the Investment Agreement.

There are substantial risks to investors as a result of the issuance of shares of our Common Stock under the Investment Agreement with Tangiers. These risks include dilution of stockholders' percentage ownership, significant decline in our stock price and our inability to draw sufficient funds when needed.

We intend to sell Tangiers periodically our Common Stock under the Investment Agreement and Tangiers will, in turn, sell such shares to investors in the market at the market price. This may cause our stock price to decline, which will require us to issue increasing numbers of common shares to Tangiers to raise the same amount of funds, as our stock price declines.

The aggregate investment amount of $5,000,000 was determined based on numerous factors, including the following: The proceeds received from any "puts" tendered to Tangiers under the Investment Agreement will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes or for other purposes that our board of directors, in its good faith deem to be in the best interest of our Company.

Page 29


We may have to increase the number of our authorized shares in order to issue the shares to Tangiers if we reach our current amount of authorized shares of Common Stock. Increasing the number of our authorized shares will require board and stockholder approval. Accordingly, because our ability to draw down any amounts under the Investment Agreement with Tangiers is subject to a number of conditions, there is no guarantee that we will be able to draw down any portion or all of the proceeds of $5,000,000 under the Investment Agreement with Tangiers.

In order for us to sell any remaining shares issuable under the Investment Agreement for the remaining $4,314,616, we would be required to file one or more additional registration statements registering the resale of these shares. These subsequent registration statements may be subject to review and comment by the staff of the SEC, and will require the consent of our independent registered public accounting firm. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in preparing and filing one or more additional registration statements registering the resale of the shares. Due to the floating offering price, we are not able to determine the exact number of shares that we will issue under the Investment Agreement.

There are no broker fees or commissions with respect to the Investment Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement payable for any Put. Other than as discussed below, we have not entered into any prior transactions with Tangiers or its affiliates.

The Company's Business

Our business model is to license our PHZIO physical therapy treatment platform to any physical therapy ("PT") clinic in the U.S. and or have large-scale employers use our PHZIO platform as a fully PT monitored corporate wellness program.

The Company's initial licensee is Evolution Physical Therapy ("EPT"), which is owned by our CEO, Darwin Fogt, MPT. All treatment revenue for 2016 was reimbursed to EPT, but was not sufficient to generate sales for the Company. Our 2016 goals were to commercially launch on September 6th, 2016, the licensing of our PHZIO platform to 3rd party physical therapy practices throughout the U.S. The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), Private Practice Section (PPS) members are our initial universe of PT practices to target.

Our sale launch began with full-page print advertising in the PT industry's premier magazine Impact in early September 2016. It is then followed up with a full-page ad in the APTA PPS Conference Buyers Guide in early October. Following these two print ads, we were a tier 1 sponsor at the PPS Las Vegas conference from October 19-22, 2016 (October 20th Lunch Sponsor and 4-6pm Cocktail Reception Sponsor & Exclusive PHZIO Demo Session for all attendees). PHZIO also had a full-page ad included in November and January 2017 Impact magazine issues.

Our sales launch included industry advertising, lead generation and qualification program, which may be implemented through a strategic partnership with a US-based sales support organization through a revenue share agreement. Our customer acquisition and sales strategy includes: Lead Generation and Qualification through a call center that utilizes well-designed program stimuli and tactics, as well as strong agent lead qualification and closing skills. Next, based upon advertising to the PPS membership, we also included an inbound sales team members to handle virtually any type of inbound hard-or soft-sell sales calls that embodies a sales performance-based culture.

We also implemented a Customer Relationship Management system ("CRM") that provides practices, strategies and technologies that we will use to manage and analyze customer interactions and data throughout the customer lifecycle, with the goal of improving business relationships with customers, assisting in customer retention and driving sales growth. CRM systems are designed to compile information on customers across different channels - or points of contact between the customer and the company - which could include the company's website, telephone, live chat, direct mail, marketing materials and social media. CRM systems can also give customer-facing staff detailed information on customers' personal information, purchase history, buying preferences and concerns.

On December 2, 2016, the Company successfully signed its initial 3rd party PT clinic for the use of its PHZIO Tele- Rehabilitation Platform. The agreement is with Back to Motion PT located in Denver Colorado. On December 9, 2016, the Company successfully signed two additional PT Clinics including a multi-clinic practice in Placerville, California and a stand- alone practice located in Mississippi for the use of its PHZIO telehealth platform. On December 14, 2016, the Company signed another 3rd party PT clinic for the use of its PHZIO Tele-Health Platform. The agreement was with a prominent Brooklyn based PT clinic, owned by Motion PT Group. The Brooklyn based clinic is one of over 45 clinics currently owned by Motion PT Group. Although this license is just for their Brooklyn location, the Company anticipates that all of Motion PT clinics may eventually treat patients using our PHZIO platform. The Company believes that there is a significant backlog of PT clinics which have a high interest in using our PHZIO platform and participating in our beta program, although there can be no guarantee that we will be able to reach agreements with such clinics.

During the first quarter of 2017 the Company began training various PT clinical operators on the use of our PHZIO system. We anticipate that initial revenue generation from these clinics will begin to generate revenue for the Company in the second quarter of 2017.

The Company is also in the process of developing marketing channel partnerships with industry association members, existing software-based telemedicine providers and physical therapy billing and practice management providers. These partnerships, if completed, are anticipated to begin adding third party PT licensee revenue during the third quarter of 2017.

The Company's PHZIO home physical therapy exercise platform has been designed to disrupt the $30 billion physical therapy and the $8 billion corporate wellness industries. PHZIO re-defines the way physical therapy can be delivered. PHZIO is the first real-time remote monitored 1-to-many physical therapy platform for home use. Due to the real-time patient monitoring feature, the PHZIO platform is insurance reimbursable by payers such as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield.

Page 30


A New Physical Therapy Delivery System

SaaS technology platform solution for providers bundling rehabilitation services and employer wellness programs;
First real-time remote monitored 1-to-many physical therapy treatment platform for home use;
Ability for physical therapists to observe multiple patients simultaneously in real-time;
Solves what has been a structural problem and limitation in post-acute care practice growth.
PT practices can experience 20% higher adherence & compliance rates versus industry standards; and
Tracking to 30% increase in net income for a PT practice.

PHZIO Treatment Session

The image below illustrates a typical PHZIO treatment session from a patient's point of view. There is communication between patients and PT conducted via audio, text and or video messaging. The patient is also able to examine form during the exercise sessions. The monitoring PT is remotely monitoring the patient real-time from PT office.

Patient program adherence in 2015 and 2016 was nearly 85 percent due the real-time patient monitoring and the at-home use of the platform. Now physical therapy practices have a way to scale profitably using a technology platform that can help them grow beyond the limits of the typical brick and mortar PT clinic.

The Company's initial PHZIO application is a 6-month exercise program for patients with back, knee or hip pain. The next two platforms, released in the third quarter of 2016, include a total knee and hip replacement exercise program. These hip and knee programs have been designed to be integrated into any hospital or medical group's Medicare CMS bundled payment model for post-acute care physical therapy. These two programs are anticipated to be followed by woman's health and geriatric programs by the end of the third quarter of 2017.

Our PHZIO platform enables employees or patients to engage with live or on-demand video based physical therapy telemedicine treatments from their home or office. Following a physician's exam and prescription for physical therapy to treat back, knee or hip pain, a patient can be examined by a physical therapist and, if found appropriate, inducted into the Company's PHZIO program that includes a progressive 6-month telemedicine exercise program (including monthly in-clinic check-ups). All PHZIO treatments are monitored by a licensed therapist that sees everything the patient is doing while providing professional guidance and feedback in real-time. This ensures treatment compliance by the patient, maintains the safety and integrity of the prescribed exercises, tracks patient metrics and captures pre-and post treatment evaluation data. PHZIO unlocks a host of potential for revolutionizing patient treatment models and directly links back to the established brick and mortar physical therapy clinic. This unique model enables any physical therapy practice to be able to execute more patient care while utilizing their same resources, and creates more value than was ever before possible.

During 2015 and 2016, our PHZIO platform achieved the following metrics:

The total (insurance reimbursed) monitored PHZIO visits in 2015 and 2016 was 1928 total patient visits that include: 2015: 699 patient visits (239 insurance reimbursed patient visits generating approximately $13,500.00 in gross revenue) and in 2016: 1,229 patient visits generating $1,496 (approximately 26 insurance reimbursed visits). These gross revenue figures were not sufficient to generate any gross sales for the Company.
The average insurance reimbursement per PHZIO session in 2015 and 2016 was $56 (excluding co-payments).
The top line wellness goals of our PHZIO program are to graduate at least 80% of inducted patients through our initial 6-month program. Patients should expect to experience an average of a 20% reduction in BMI, a 4-inch reduction in waist size, weight loss of at least 20 pounds, significant overall improvement in balance, coordination, flexibility, strength, and lumbopelvic stability. Patients also should score better on Functional Outcomes Scales (Oswestry and LEFS), which indicates improved functional activity levels due to reduced low back, knee and hip pain.

Page 31


Our PHZIO platform, including design, testing, exercise intervention, follow-up, and exercise demonstration, has been developed by accomplished Los Angeles based physical therapist Darwin Fogt, who currently serves as the Company's CEO. Mr. Fogt has extensive experience and education working with diverse populations from professional athletes to morbidly obese. He understands the most beneficial exercise prescription to achieve optimal results and has had enormous success in motivating all patient types to stay consistent in working toward their goals. Additionally, his methods have proven effective and safe as he demonstrates exercises with attention to proper form to avoid injury. Mr. Fogt has established himself as a national leader in his field and has successfully implemented progressive solutions to delivering physical therapy. He has consulted with and been published by numerous national publications including Runner's World, Men's Health, Men's Journal, and various physical therapy specific magazines. His has 13 plus years of experience rehabilitating the general population, as well as professional athletes, Olympic gold medalists, and celebrities. He has bridged the gap between physical therapy and fitness by opening Evolution Fitness, which uses licensed physical therapists to teach high intensity circuit training fitness classes. He also founded one of the first exclusive prenatal and postnatal physical therapy clinic in the country. Mr. Fogt is a leader in advancing the profession to incorporate research-based methods and focus on not only rehabilitation but also wellness, functional fitness, performance, and prevention. He can recognize that the national healthcare structure (federal and private insurance) is moving toward a model of prevention and that the physical therapy profession will take a larger role in providing wellness services to patients.

Innovators in other industries have solved access, cost and quality inefficiencies through the implementation of technology platforms and business models that deliver products and services on-demand and create new economies by connecting and empowering both consumers and businesses. We have taken the same approach to solving the pervasive access, cost and quality challenges facing the current access to physical therapy clinics.

Our underlying technology platform is complex, deeply integrated and purpose-built over the past four years for the evolving physical therapy marketplace. Our PHZIO platform is highly scalable and can support substantial growth of third party licensees. Our PHZIO platform provides for broad interconnectivity between PT practitioners and their patients and, we believe, uniquely positions us as a focal point in the rapidly evolving PT industry to introduce innovative, technology-based solutions, such as remote patient monitoring, post-discharge treatment plan adherence and in-home care.

We plan to generate revenue from third-party PT and corporate wellness licensees on a contractually recurring per PHZIO session fee basis. Our PHZIO platform is anticipated to transform the access, cost and quality dynamics of physical therapy delivery for all of the market participants. We further believe any patient, employer, health plan or healthcare professional interested in a better approach to physical therapy is a potential PHZIO platform user.

Background on our PHZIO Technology

The Company's Chief Technology Officer ("CTO"), Curtis Hollister, one program developer, and one content manager support our PHZIO system and are in Ottawa Canada. The below noted chart contains information on our PHZIO System.

Page 32


IP and Licensing

We have licensed our telemedicine platform from Bistromatics Inc., a company owned by our CTO, for perpetuity for any telemedicine application in any market worldwide. The below noted chart highlights what we have built to date.

Our History

We entered into a share exchange agreement (the "Initial Exchange Agreement") pursuant to which we agreed to issue, 9,200,000 shares of our unregistered common stock, $.001 par value (the "common stock") to the shareholders of eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("eWellness" or "Private Co."). In addition, our former chief executive officer agreed to tender 5,000,000 shares of common stock back to the Company for cancellation and to assign from his holdings an additional 2,500,000 shares to the shareholders of eWellness Corporation resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders, as well as a further assignment of an additional 2,100,000 shares to other parties as stated therein. There were no warrants, options or other equity instruments issued in connection with the share exchange agreement.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 ("Rule 419") of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. However, Rule 419 required that the share exchange transaction (the "Share Exchange") contemplated by the Initial Exchange Agreement occur on or before March 18, 2014. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management and eWellness, the parties entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A ("Form 8A") to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the 419 transaction into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the "Converted Offering"). We also agreed to change our name to eWellness Healthcare Corporation to more accurately reflect our new business and operations after the Share Exchange, which occurred and was effective as of April 25, 2014.

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, we purchased 100% of eWellness' common stock in exchange for 9,200,000 shares of our then outstanding shares of common stock and the share exchange closed. As a result, eWellness became our wholly owned subsidiary and its shareholders owned approximately 76.97% of our then issued and outstanding common stock, after giving effect to the cancellation of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock held by Andreas A. McRobbie-Johnson, our former chief executive officer and the further assignment of his shares of common stock as described therein.

On July 22, 2015, our wholly owned subsidiary, eWellness Corporation, was merged into the Company and, therefore, no longer exists as a separate entity.

The Physical Therapy Telemedicine Space

One of the most promising and rapidly developing areas of healthcare and rehabilitation is telemedicine – the use of telecommunication technologies to provide health information, assessment, monitoring, and treatment to individuals with chronic conditions from a distance. Increasingly, insurers, healthcare providers, and technology vendors are using telemedicine solutions and services to make medical intervention both more convenient and accessible to patients to raise the quality of care while reducing costs. (Herrick 2007).

Page 33


Low back pain is second only to upper respiratory problems as a symptom-related reason for visits to a physician. (Andersson 1999 Hart LG)1995). By 2023, the estimated cost of chronic conditions including low back pain and diabetes including treatment and lost productivity will swell to $4.2 trillion annually. (Deyo RA, 2001). Home-based telemedicine holds promise as an effective method for providing physical therapy exercise programs to these segments of our populations including people with back, hip and knee pain and for those individuals who may be pre-diabetic and/or are obese.

Physical therapy intervention including core muscle strengthening exercise along with lumbar flexibility and gluteus maximus strengthening is an effective rehabilitation technique for all chronic low back pain patients irrespective of different duration (less than one year and more than one year) of their pain. (Kumar T, 2014). It has also been widely proven that strengthening and aerobic exercises are effective at reducing symptoms and preventing knee pain among patients with osteoarthritis and other painful knee conditions. (Senanik P, 2012).

Physical therapy intervention is becoming an increasingly accepted mode of intervention delivery and policy recommendations have been made to State Boards of Physical Therapy. (Julian J. 2014). The PHZIO.COMPHZIO platform complies and exceeds the recommendations for physical therapy intervention delivered via telemedicine.

The PHZIO.COMPHZIO platform eliminates the barrier of transportation, offers participants the flexibility of exercising at their preferred time of day, and does not involve as much energy or time necessary to get to an exercise or fitness facility.

Traditionally, physical therapy exercise programs are based upon exercise and education provisioned by physical therapist to patients at a brick and mortar facility using a face-to-face model of care. Over the past three years, we have conceptualized, designed, engineered, tested and deployed our PHZIO.COMPHZIO platform.

Physical Therapy Industry Statistics

Below are some statistics we recently gathered regarding the Physical Therapy industry.1

U.S. Current Annual Industry Revenue $31 Billion 
(IBIS World, 2015)    
     
U.S. Clinics  103,311 
(IBIS World, 2015)    
     
U.S. Industry Consolidated Clinics  15%
U.S. Largest Consolidator Penetration  3%
U.S. Industry Projected Annual Growth in Demand  7%
(Harris Williams & Co., 2014)    
     
U.S. Physical Therapy Average Clinic Annual Revenue $543,000 
(Cafariello, August 5th, 2014)    
     
U.S. Clinic Median Profit  13%
Larger locations, with an annual income greater than $1 million, generated a significantly higher median profit level (23 percent) than smaller sites (8 percent).    
     
(Charles R. Felder)    
     
U.S. Total Individual Therapist 2012  204,200 
U.S. Total Individual Therapist 2022  277,700 
(Healthcare Wages)    
     
U.S. Physical Therapist Labor Costs    
Median wage for a licensed Physical Therapist   
Per hour $38.39 
Per year $79,860 
(U.S. Department of Labor)    

1Works Cited

Cafariello, J. (August 5th, 2014).Investing in Physical Therapy. Wealth Daily.

Charles R. Felder, P. S. (n.d.).Reality Check. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://physica therapy.advanceweb.com/Editorial/Content/PrintFriendly.aspx?CC=98030: http://physical-therapy.advanceweb.com/Editorial/Content/PrintFriendly.aspx?CC=98030

Harris Williams & Co. (2014).PHYSICAL THERAPY MARKET OVERVIEW. Harris Williams LLC.

Healthcare Wages. (n.d.).PHYSICAL THERAPIST SALARY INFORMATION. Retrieved June 11, 2015, from Healthcare Wages : http://www.healthcarewages.org/physical-therapist-salary/

IBIS World. (2015).Physical Therapists Market Research Report | NAICS 62134 | Jun 2015. Physical Therapists in the US: Market Research Report.

U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.).Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2014-15 Edition, Physical Therapists. Retrieved June 12, 2015, from Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/physical-therapists.htm

Our PHZIO Platform

Our PHZIO.COMcurrent PHZIO platform includes a fully customizable treatment program for multiple physical therapy treatment plans including patient rehabilitations for total knee, hip and shoulder surgeries, lower and upper back ailments and other physical therapy treatments. We currently have a growing library of over 250 individual 2-4 minute exercise videos within our PHZIO platform, with additional exercise content generated as needed. Our initial PHZIO program included a 6-month 78 session 40-minute on-line distance monitored telemedicine exercise program that is a physician prescribed (insurance reimbursable) physical therapy exercise program designed around an exercise kit that includes: an inflatable exercise ball, latex resistance bands, a yoga mat and stretch strap that provides a comprehensive exercise regimen that minimizes stress on the joints while allowing for hundreds of progressive exercises that focus on strength, balance, cardiovascular conditioning, coordination and flexibility.

Our PHZIO.COMinitial PHZIO platform is an on-line distance monitored telemedicine exercise program with a 6-month duration, wherein seventy-eight (78) individual 40-minute progressive exercise sessions are watched & interacted with by a patient on their laptop computer.
The patients are inducted into the PHZIO.COMPHZIO program through a physician prescription and physical therapist evaluation. The PHZIO.COM physical therapyPHZIO program is designed around an exercise kit that includes: an inflatable exercise ball, latex resistance bands, a yoga mat and stretch strap.
The patient follows the PHZIO.COMPHZIO instructions and performs the specific exercises while being remotely monitored by a physical therapist through the camera located on the laptop computer. The PHZIO.COMPHZIO program provides a comprehensive exercise regimentregimen that minimizes stress on the joints while allowing for hundreds of progressive exercises that focuses on strength, balance, coordination, and flexibility.
The PHZIO.COMPHZIO program is designed to be operated in a patient’spatient's home or office in order to increase compliance and eliminate transportation to a fitness center or gym.
Our PHZIO system allows licensed physical therapists to monitor multiple patients (system designed for up to 30 patients at a timetime) while these patients are on-line and following along with our PHZIO.COMPHZIO exercise program. Each patient and physical therapist has real-time, voice, text and video conferencing capability when interaction is needed between the patient and our physical therapist.

When patients are referred to an eWellness PT licensee, a physical therapist and assistant will evaluate patients forperform an in-clinic evaluation to determine if the patient is appropriate to be treated using the PHZIO program. The goal is to ensure compliance with the therapeutic exercise regimen, that may lead to reduce BMI to a healthy number, help patients lose weight and boost their activity level for the six-monthduring a multi-month program.

Patients can access a series of progressively difficult workouts in 40-40 to 45-minute videos from home. They use a unique log-in from an application, which will securely store all their data over a six-monthmulti-month period. When patients log on, it triggers a camera in the physical therapists’therapists' remote office.

Teams of four physical therapy assistants supervised by a senior physical therapistPhysical therapists will monitor patients to ensure compliance. A remote physical therapist watches in real time while the patient is performing the exercises and guides him through his exercise sessions. The therapist provides constant feedback, instruction and motivation and ensures patients are doing the exercises properly and safely. The supervising therapist can speak to the user or communicate through text message.

Competition

To date,We have identified multiple privately-held telemedicine and exercise platform companies that utilize Avatar/Kinect-based telerehb platforms including: Reflexion Health, RespondWell, Physmodo, Jintronx, MotionCare 360 and Five Plus. Additionally, we have not identified any other program that is designed to provide Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Telemedicine Program that has been specifically designed to help prevent pre-diabetic patients from becoming diabetic. Although we compete against typical brick and mortarvideo-based physical therapy practices, they are limited significantlysolutions such as: Bluejay, PT Pal, VitalRock, Physiotech, SimplyTherapy and YouTube. Yet, none of these companies have real-time PT monitoring, one-to-many platform, reimbursable treatments and strong program compliance and adherence by the number of patients that can be seen in an 8 hour shift and do not offer any telemedicine products. The national average is approximately 16 patients per day per Physical Therapist (“PT”) or PT assistant (“PTA”). Once we launch our DMpt services, our PTs and PTAs are anticipated to be as high as 137 patients per day. We anticipate being able to deliver up to 850% more patient volume per PT and PTA. Additionally, existing telemedicine physical therapy businesses do create and sell exercise videos, but such business is not insurance reimbursable and there is little patient engagement. (See, Risk Factors, “We operate in a highly competitive industry.”) Accordingly, we believe that we are first-to-market with the innovative service and program we seek to provide.patients.

Page 34


eWellness DMpt Program Cost Savings for the Insurance Industry.Diabetes is not only common and serious; it is also a very costly disease. The cost of treating diabetes is staggering. According to the American Diabetes Association, the annual cost of diabetes in medical expenses and lost productivity rose from $98 billion in 1997 to $132 billion in 2002 and to $174 billion in 2007.New York State Department of health, http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/conditions/diabetes/, Paragraph titled “Diabetes is Serious and Costly”. The American Diabetes Association released new research on March 6, 2013 estimating the total costs of diagnosed diabetes have risen to $245 billion in 2012 from $174 billion in 2007, when the cost was last examined. This figure represents a 41 percent increase over a five year period.American Diabetes Association, http://www.diabetes.org/newsroom/press-releases/2013/annual-costs-of-diabetes-2013.html.The average yearly health care costs for a person without diabetes is $2,560; for a person with diabetes, that figure soars to $11,744 or an increase of $9,184 per year.New York State Department of health, http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/conditions/diabetes/. Much of the human and financial costs can be avoided with proven diabetes prevention and management steps. Our 6-month DMpt program has a simple goal of preventing pre-diabetics from becoming diabetic. As an example of the magnitude of potential savings, based upon successfully taking 10,000 patients through our program and lowering their BMI and weight and significantly improving their wellness, the cost savings to the insurance industry could be significant. Based on the above statistics, for every 10,000 patients that do not become diabetic, it would create a savings of approximately $2.296 billion over a 25-year period or $91.84 million per year. The program costs to insurers for those 10,000 patients would have otherwise been approximately $17.82 million.

The DMpt PZHIO.COM Exercise Program

A Monitored In-office & Telemedicine Exercise Program: Our initial 6-month DMptPHZIO exercise program has been designed to provide patients, who are accepted into the program, with traditional one-on-one PT evaluations, re-evaluations (every one to four weeks throughout the DMptPHZIO program depending on type of insurance), and atafter the conclusion of the program a Physical Performance Test. These PTs are known as Induction & Evaluation Physical Therapists (“IEPTs”("IEPTs"). All patient medical data, information and records are retained in the files of the IEPT. The IEPT will also evaluate the progress of the patient’spatient's participation in our DMptPHZIO program.

Physician DiagnosisDiagnosis:: Following a physician’sphysician's diagnosis of a patient with non-acute back pain, who is also likely overweight and pre-diabetic, a physician may prescribe the patient to participate in the eWellness DMptPHZIO exercise program.
Enrollment ProcessProcess:: The accepted patients are assessed by our in-office PTs and PTAs,a PT, located at selected company referred physician officesa PT Licensee clinic and then enrolled in our DMptPHZIO program by going online to our DMptPHZIO program virtual private network (“VPN”("VPN") and creating a login name and password. The patient will then populate their calendar with planned times when they anticipate exercising. They will also be provided with a free exercise ball, resistance stretch bands, stretch strap and yoga mat at induction.
Exercising BeginsBegins:: The day after the patient receives the equipment, the patient will log on to our VPN at least 3 times per week, to watch and follow the prescribed 40 minute40-minute on-line exercise program. The DMptPHZIO platform also allows two-way communication (videoconferencing) with one of our licensee's On-line Physical Therapists (“OLPT’s”("OLPT's"), who is responsible for monitoring on-line patients. The OLPT’sOLPT's are also available to answer patient’spatient's questions. When availableavaila.ble the patients exercise sessions are recorded and stored in our system as proof that they completed the prescribed exercises. There are 2678 various 40-minute exercise videos that are viewed by our patients in successive order.
Open 6am-9amDriving Patients to work out between 6:00am-9:30am 5 days per weekweek:: Our DMptPHZIO system has a calendar function so that patients can schedule when they will login to our DMptPHZIO system. This calendar enables usa PT Licensee to better spread the load of patients participating in any forty-minute on-line exercise program during our 15 hours of weekly operations, 6am through 9am9:30am Monday through Friday.Friday are to most optimal hours for patient engagement. Also, if the patient is not on-line at the planned exercise time, our system can send them an automated reminder, via text, voicemail and or e-mail messaging.

Trackable Physical Therapy.The exercise DMptPHZIO prescription and instruction will be delivered with a series of on-line videos easily accessed by each patient on the internet. Each video will be approximately 40 minutes in length with exercises, which will specifically address the common impairments associated with diabetes and/or obesity. Exercise programs will be able to be performed within each patient’spatient's own home or work location without requiring standard gym equipment. Each patient will be required to log in to the system withwhich will monitor performance automatically in order to ensure their compliance. Each patient will be required to follow up with their referring physician and PT at designated intervals and metrics such as blood pressure, blood sugars, BMI, etc. will be recorded to ensure success of the program.

Patient Program Goals.OnOur initial PHZIO program was designed so that the average each patient is targeted to lose 2 pounds per week, totaling up to 48 pounds over the duration of the program to progress toward healthier defined BMI, reduction body fat percentage by at least 8%, reduced reliance on medication for blood glucose regulation and dosage or frequency and a goal of at least a 50% adherence to continuing the DMptPHZIO program independently at conclusion of program.

Trackable Video Exercise Program.The On-Line DMptPHZIO video content will includeincludes all aspects of wellness preventative care to ensure the best results: cardiovascular training, resistance training, flexibility, and balance and stabilization; research studies on all such distinct impairments have shown to provide effective treatment results. Each video will integrateintegrates each of the four components to guarantee a comprehensive approach to the wellness program, but each video will specifically highlight one of the four components. All of our DMptPHZIO video content willcan be fully mobile application compliant and are also availableviewed on all desktops, tablets, PC’sPC's and MAC computers and devices. Multiple DMpt exercise videos will be shot to improve adherence to the program and limit redundancy for the patients. Our plan is to recruit recognizable athletes and celebrities to participate as subjects in the videos to improve interest for the patients and improve compliance.computers.

Specific Video Programs.Each patient wouldwill receive a prescription for six months (26 week) of physical therapy and exercise that is provided by viewing on-line programs produced by eWellness where the patient can do these exercises and stretching on their own at least 3 days per week for at least 40 minutes. The DMptPHZIO videos can be watched on a laptop or desktop computer.computer (and on IOS and Android smart phones by the second quarter of 2017). In order to view the videos the patient would log onto the eWellnessPHZIO web-site and would be directed to watch the appropriate video in sequence. As the patient is logged-in, eWellnessthe monitoring PT will be able to monitor how often and if the entire video session was viewed. This data would be captured and sent weekly to the prescribing physician and eWellnessthe monitoring PT for review. At all times, a licensed OLPT/PTA will have access to each patient utilizing the videos and will be able to communicate with a patient via video-conferencing and/or instant messaging. This will help improve adherence to the program as well as the success and safety of the patients’patients' treatments. A patient will also be instructed to walk or ride a bike at least 30 minutes three days per week in addition to participating in our program.

If the patient is not viewing the videos, then the prescribing physician and/or the eWellnessmonitoring PT would reach out to the patient by telephone and/or e-mail to encourage the patient to keep up their physical fitness regime. After each series, the patient returns for an office visit to the prescribing physician for blood tests, blood pressure and a weight management check- up as well as a follow-up visit with the PT for assessment of the patient’spatient's progress toward established goals.

Exercise Patient KitsKits..Each patient Most patients will receive a home exercise tool kit, which will include: an inflatable exercise ball, a hand pump, a yoga mat, a yoga strap, and varying levels of resistance bands, free of any additional charges.bands. Each of the DMptPHZIO exercise videos will include exercises that incorporate the items in the tool kit. By using a bare minimum of equipment, patients should be able to participate more easily at home or at their workplace. Our estimated cost of the kit is $49, which we pay and factored in to ouraPT licensees revenue stream and internal projections. The cost of the exercise kits may also be billed to the patients account.

Page 35


Our Cloud-based DMptPHZIO System Design.Our Chief Technology Officer (CTO), Curtis Hollister,CTO is currently a principal shareholder and operator of two video content platform based businesses in Ottawa Canada that have built and own the intellectual property for various global corporate and governmental projects having similar requirements as ours. Not only will Mr. Hollister’shis experience stand to significantly shorten our path to service activation of our own program, but his industry contacts will provide immediate access to valuable resources. Because of this access, initially all system maintenance, updates and upgrades of our PHZIO.comPHZIO platform will be made by Mr. Hollister as our Chief Technology Officerhim and a readily available team of independent freelance consultants in Ottawa. Additionally, through his ownership in these video content platform businesses, the Company was able todid enter into an agreement with one of them to secure the rights to intellectual property completing approximately 80%100% of the Company’sCompany's systems requirements at a total cost of $20,000. The remaining efforts to build-out our cloud-based platform were completed in late October 2014 and were tested on a limited basis during November and December 2014, with a now completed launch on April 29, 2015. Our platform was built based on the Zendesk® highly-scalable customer service application platform. Initially,Currently, all system maintenance, updates and upgrades will be made by Mr. Hollister’sour CTO's team in Ottawa.

Text based Patient Engagement Protocol & Engagement Tools.We intend on using text based messaging to assist in continuous patient engagement in order to improve on our patient program drop-out rate, which is anticipated to be 50%, spread-out over the 6-month program. eWellness’ Text based Patient Engagement Protocol will initially include:

Exercise reminder after 3 minutes past the anticipated start time, if the patient is not logged into our exercise system at the time noted in their patient calendar.
Daily meal suggestions for breakfast, lunch and dinner to be sent out daily at 5:30am, 11:00am and 5:00pm.
Four hours after a patient has watched an exercise video, each will be asked how they feel: more energy, less energy, tired, in pain?
Remind patients on days off days to fit in cardio that day by riding a bike, walking and taking the stairs for at least 30 minutes.
Recommend for the more advanced patients to have them add up to 100 squats per day to their work out. Remind them daily in the morning and then ask them in the afternoon if they did the squats.

Follow-on Program.Upon conclusion of the prescribed exercise prescription, each successful patient shall be given the option of continuing to have access to the library of videos for continued independent progression for a nominal fee of $29.95 per year. New video content with exercises specifically designed for the assigned population prescribed and demonstrated by a licensed PT will be filmed to maintain interest in the exercises among the viewing audience.

Treatment & Reimbursement Strategy.We have formulated a treatment and reimbursement strategy that eliminates a significant portion of our reimbursement risk associated with billing for telemedicine sessions. After thoroughly reviewing our DMpt program with MHI, it is clear that our initial billing will be highly focused on in-office physical therapy patient visits rather than telemedicine sessions. In fact, we now anticipate that telemedicine visits will only account for a small portion of total billing in year one. We have developed three DMpt Program Reimbursement Plans that allow us to provide our program to all patients that have insurance. Please see, “Insurance/Reimbursement” below.

MHI Physican Collaboration Process.We will provide each participating physician with market-value rent for one of their treatment room’s on a monthly basis, to house one of our PTs and PTAs. Our onsite team will induct patients into our program and complete ongoing assessments of patients as they proceed through our 6-month program. Each onsite team consisting of one certified Physical Therapist (PT) and one certified Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) will attend to 21 patients per day between the two of them. Assuming a seven hour work day, that averages to approximately one patient every 40 minutes per certified professional. These patient visits will consist of either first time enrollments or follow-up assessments, which in the general realm of Physical Therapy tasks are considered neither time consuming or intensive.

Additionally, each patient who is participating in our DMpt program is required to return to the physical office location at monthly or weekly intervals (depending on the type of health insurance plan), at which time they may also have a follow-up office visit with their physician.

Physicians can confidently prescribe the eWellness program to qualified patients and be sure that those patients are receiving the best guidance and support with respect to physical activity and diet in order to reduce their risk factors associated with diabetes and obesity. The remote-based treatments also represent additional opportunities for each patient to perform preventative biometric screening which may have been prescribed by the physician and be reimbursable.

The physician will only need to sign a prescription for the physical therapy for qualified patients in order for them to become enrolled into the eWellness DMpt program. The physician is not responsible for any additional paperwork or treatment.

On Line Physical Therapy (OLPT).Our PTs will interface with our patients in two settings. One setting is the “in office” enrollment and follow-up visits as previously described and the other setting is the On Line Physical Therapy (OLPT) portion of our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) program. In the OLPT setting, the patient interacts with a certified professional via a mobile device within the patients chosen space time three times per week.

OLPT Physical Therapy Operational Assumptions.We will begin operations with just a single OLPT PT and expand the OLPT team size to up to 2 PTAs supervised by 1 PT as our patient load grows. Eventually we anticipate that we will grow to 3OLPT teams with 1 OLPT and 4 PTs. If a patient requests a video conference, that patient is switched over to the OLPT for any answers to questions. The patient will continue to be monitored for the remainder of the session by the OLPT.

Based upon discussions with various healthcare professionals, the most active work out times are between 6:00am and 9:00am. We will also know through our calendar what times the patient has selected for his/her the work outs, which will also be a guide to staffing. We will need to try to drive patients into open slots in our OLPT/PTA schedule. Initial service hours will be from 6:00am to 9:00am (3 hours per day), 5-days per week.

Insurance/Reimbursement

Based on management’s experience and reviewThus far in the state of insurance literature, they believe that if a provider offers telemedicine reimbursement, such provider will typically reimburse the same number of telemedicine visits as the number of allowable in-office physical therapy visits. Currently, managementCalifornia our initial licensee has successfully receivedgained reimbursement by Californiafrom Blue Cross, Blue Shield and CIGNA insurance companies. The licensee receiver reimbursements that allows for reimbursement associated with telemedicine physical therapy and other insurers including Medicare, Medicaid and other private insurers currently will not reimburse for physical therapy via telemedicine. This is why we have created multiple billing plans that may or may not include reimbursement for telemedicine physical therapy. We anticipate negotiating individual reimbursement plans with each insurance company. We also believe that the definition of telemedicine may broaden over the next 1-5 yearsare equivalent to include physical therapy. While we believe our management team has a strong grasp of the pulse and trends of the insurance industry, there can be no assurance that management’s industry perceptions are accurate or that there will there will be any changes to insurance reimbursement policy associated with physical therapy telemedicine at any insurance company.

in-clinic patient reimbursements. For PT licensee patients, whose insurance companies provide little or no reimbursement for Physical Therapy Telemedicine Reimbursement, they willmay have higher co-payments for our servicesparticipating in the PHZIO program or be responsible to pay the full cost of such services.

Telemedicine Physical Therapy Reimbursement:

We believe that by introducing and leveraging telemedicine in certain categories of physical therapy patients, we will create access and convenience to services for the patient and efficiency cost savings, as well as long term patient outcome savings for the insurance provider. We have divided our planned program into 4 different basic billing groups to accommodate reimbursement for our program from a variety of sources typical of our anticipated patient base. We will continue to add billing groups as our patient base evolves and grows. In all four programs remote telemedicine represents at least 75% of the appointments we will be conducting with each patient. Our proposed business operations never include more than 25% in-office appointments for any of the four patient programs. While our proposed operations and delivery of services in all our patient programs is predominantly remote telemedicine and we believe that insurance providers will eventually find telemedicine a rewarding mechanism, our plan does not rely on evolving telemedicine billing codes to sustain our current patient programs. Therefore, early on our sustainability plans are to anticipate that a significant portion of our reimbursement will be generated via the insignificant in-office appointments portion of our operations.

Our operations and delivery of services is predominantly remote monitored telemedicine. We anticipate having significant patient data on the value of monitored patients verses non-monitored patients after the initial 6-months of running our DMpt Program and we suspect this data will show that active monitoring significantly improves outcomes. Thus, we believe that private insurers and Medicare/Medicaid will start reimbursing for our telemedicine visits some time in year two, after these results are revealed. Accordingly, in year one, although we will provide our telemedicine services, only a small portion of our gross revenues will be from telemedicine reimbursements; we expect that revenue stream to increase in year two and year three, during which we project the majority of our revenues to come from telemedicine reimbursement. Additional revenue in year 1 will come from patients whose insurance does not cover telemedicine, but who want to be monitored and are willing to pay out of pocket, the $100 monthly fee we charge for a set number of monitored telemedicine sessions; based on our understanding of this industry and the current and anticipated state of medical insurance and reimbursement, we have based our projections on the belief that a small portion of patients whose insurance does not cover telemedicine are willing to pay for it themselves.

Five Separate Reimbursement Plans

Our program is a combination of therapy for 26 weeks and is designed to guide a patient through active physical retraining. We have divided our program into 4 different basic billing models to accommodate the majority of reimbursability of our anticipated patient base. The following is a further break down of those billing groups by type of appointment and reimbursement:

Program A (Private Insured) - 6 in-office visits and 24 monitored and 54 un-monitored telemedicine sessions: We anticipate that in year 1, a smaller portion of our patients will have private health insurance that accepts physical therapy telemedicine billing and that our average per patient reimbursement will be approximately $2,935 for the completed six-month DMpt program that includes 6 in-office visits and 24 telemedicine sessions; Program A also includes 54 non-monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes. In year 2, we anticipate this insurance covered segment to grow, but by year 3, become a significant portion of our patient load.
Program A - Private Insured        
Total patient appointments  84   100%
Appointments insurance reimbursed under current codes (30 Appointments Total - 36%)        
In-office enrollments or check-ups (insurance reimbursed)  6   7%
Monitored remote physical therapy sessions (insurance reimbursed)  24   29%
Appointments not insurance reimbursed undercurrent codes        
Non-monitored remote physical therapy sessions (not reimbursed)  54   64%

Program B (Partial Insurance + Self Pay) - 14 in-office visits reimbursed via insurance and up to 78 monitored telemedicine sessions for $100.00 per month via out-of-pocket: We anticipate that in year 1 through year 3, a significant portion of our patients will consist of patients with insurance that only reimburses for in-office visits. We anticipate that our average per patient reimbursement for patients in this program will be approximately $1,872.25 for a completed 26 week DMpt program that includes 14 in-office visits and up to 78 monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes, but for which the patient can receive for an out of pocket cost of $100.00 per month at their discretion.

Program B - Limited or Catastrophic Insured        
Total patient appointments  92   100%
Appointments insurance reimbursed under current codes        
In-office enrollments or check-ups (insurance reimbursed)  14   15%
Appointments patient pays $100 monthly flat rate        
Monitored remote physical therapy sessions  78   85%

Program C (Medicare) -14 in-office visits and 78 un-monitored telemedicine sessions: We anticipate that in year 1, a significant portion of our patients will have Medicare or state insurance that does not initially reimburse for physical therapy telemedicine, but will reimburse for in-office visits. We anticipate that the average per patient reimbursement will be approximately $1,369 for a completed six-month DMpt program that includes 12 in-office patient visits; Program C also includes up to 78 un-monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes. In year 2, we anticipate this segment to decline, but still remain significant and become a minor portion of our patient base in year 3.

Program C - Medicare Medicaid        
Total patient appointments  92   100%
Appointments reimbursed undercurrent insurance codes        
In-office enrollments or check-ups (insurance reimbursed)  14   15%
Appointments not reimbursed under current insurance code        
Un-monitored remote physical therapy sessions  78   85%

Program D (Self-Insured / Self-Pay) - 14 in-office visits and up to 78 monitored telemedicine sessions for $300.00 per month via out-of-pocket: We anticipate that in year 1 through year 3, a very small portion of our patients will consist of patients self-insured or self-pay. We anticipate that our average per patient reimbursement for patients in this Program will be approximately $2,100 for a completed 26 week DMpt program that includes 14 in-office visits; Program D also includes up to 78 non-monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes.

Program D - Non-Insured/Cash Pay        
Total patient appointments  92   100%
Appointments patient pays $300 monthly flat rate (no insurance reimbursement)        
In-office enrollments or check-ups (non-reimbursed & covered under flat rate)  14   15%
Monitored remote physical therapy sessions (non-reimbursed & covered under flat rate)  78   85%

Program E (Brick-n-Mortar)- 26 in-office visits and up to 78 monitored telemedicine sessions. We anticipate that in year 1 through year 3, a significant portion of our patients will consist of patients with insurance that only reimburses for in-office visits. We anticipate that our average per patient reimbursement for patients in this program will be approximately $1,948.33 for a completed 26 week DMpt program that includes 26 in-office visits and up to 78 monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes.

Program E - Brick-n-Mortar        
Total patient appointments  104   100%
Appointments insurance reimbursed under current codes        
In-office enrollments or check-ups (insurance reimbursed)  26   25%
Appointments patient pays $0        
Monitored remote physical therapy sessions  78   75%

Non-monitored sessions include watching our on-line exercise classes and receiving engagement communications from our system without direct monitoring; if needed, patients will also be able to log-in and communicate with one of our OLPTs between 6:00am and 9:00pm, 7 days per week.

There is virtually no cost to us to send out the digital content that makes up the bulk of the non-monitored sessions. The patient retention data we can discern from this segment provides great value to us because we can provide it to the insurance agencies to demonstrate the benefits of monitoring.

Expansion into other markets where telemedicine has high support.On December 20,th 2013, we executed a 25-year licensing agreement with a London, Ontario based telemedicine company Physical Relief Telemedicine Health Care Services (“PRTHCS”("PRTHCS"), pursuant to which we granted PRTHCS a limited, transferable right to use and promote our DMptPHZIO Program within the province of Ontario; additional Canadian territories may be added at the partiesparties' mutual discretion. PRTHCS has a known track-record in the telemedicine industry in Canada.

They will also pay us a 20% monthly royalty fee on gross billing for services under To date PRTHCS has been unsuccessful in licensing our DMpt program. PRTHCS also agreedPHZIO platform to pay us all costs to setup their own cloud-based system and to film 26 unique English and French speaking versions of our exercise video in Ontario; the estimated costs of these services is estimated at $117,000 (the “Cloud Fee”), which shall be made in three separate payments. However, after meeting with them in February of 2014, it was determined that PRTHCS could deploy our cloudany Canadian based service in Canada just as it was designed for the U.S. domestic market and therefore, we agreed to waive the Cloud Fee and all parties agreed to move forward accordingly in June 2014.

Pursuant to the agreement, we agreed to provide technical support, as needed and issued them a one year limited warranty on our program. The agreement also provides for the parties to indemnify one another against certain program or agreement related losses.

The agreement provides a 25 year license, which term shall renew annually thereafter, unless earlier terminated. We may terminate the agreement after a material breach of the agreement by either party, if either party is dissolved for any reason, if PRTHC is restrained from transacting a substantial part of its business for 60 consecutive days due to court, administrative or governmental order, or if either party becomes party to a bankruptcy proceeding or makes an assignment to liquidate all of its assets. PRTHC may terminate the agreement at any time with 30 days notice to the Company, although such termination does not relieve them of all of their payment obligations under the agreement. They have yet to begin marketing our DMpt program.

PT clinics.

Our Planned Expansion into other States where Telemedicine has high support.The most common path being taken by states is to cover telemedicine services in their Medicaid program. 42 states now provide some form of Medicaid reimbursement for telemedicine services (mostly physician to physician consultations). More importantly 16 states have now expanded their definition of telemedicine to include physical therapy and have also required that state and private insurance plans cover telemedicine services. Those 16 states with the broadest telemedicine policies include: Alaska, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Virginia and Vermont.

Company Development Costs.As of the date of this Registration Statement,Report, we have spent approximately 1428 months developing our unique business model and our design for eWellness’the Company's automated website and systems for the DMptour PHZIO program. Over the course of the 14-month28-month development phase we expended approximately $780,078$2,057,611 in travel expenses, legal, consulting services and miscellaneous expenses. Additionally, we expended a total of approximately 2,575 professional man-hours between the various management team members that if billed at a rate of $200.00 per hour equates to approximately $515,000 in professional time. Thus, our imbedded development costs have totalled approximately $1,295,078.

Intellectual Property

With adequate funding, we anticipate the development of various Application and Pioneering Methods patent protect and Trademark protection associated with our technology platform and unique physical therapy treatments.

REGULATIONS AND HEALTHCARE REFORM

Numerous federal, state and local regulations regulate healthcare services and those who provide them. Some states into which we may expand have laws requiring facilities employing health professionals and providing health-related services to be licensed and, in some cases, to obtain a certificate of need (that is, demonstrating to a state regulatory authority the need for, and financial feasibility of, new facilities or the commencement of new healthcare services). Only one of the states in which we intend to roll out our services requires a certificate of need for the operation of our physical therapy business functions. Our therapists however, are required to be licensed, as determined by the state in which they provide services. Failure to obtain or maintain any required certificates, approvals or licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

State Legislation

Insurance reimbursement for our PHZIO services is likely to improve in 2017 and beyond based upon current draft legislation in Congress that seeks to significantly expand Medicare's reimbursement for telemedicine services including for physical therapy. If passed, this legislation would drive private healthcare insurers to also reimburse for physical therapy associated with telemedicine. Also, in early November 2014, we were advised by the California State Board of Physical Therapy ("CSBPT") that we could operate our PHZIO platform and bill patients' insurance within the Association's rules in the state of California.

Stark Law

Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. Section 1395nn) (the "Stark Law") prohibit referrals by a physician of "designated health services" which are payable, in whole or in part, by Medicare or Medicaid, to an entity in which the physician or the physician's immediate family member has an investment interest or other financial relationship, subject to several exceptions. Unlike the Fraud and Abuse Law, the Stark Law is a strict liability statute. Proof of intent to violate the Stark Law is not required. Physical therapy services are among the "designated health services". Further, the Stark Law has application to the Company's management contracts with individual physicians and physician groups, as well as, any other financial relationship between us and referring physicians, including any financial transaction resulting from a clinic acquisition. The Stark Law also prohibits billing for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. Several states have enacted laws similar to the Stark Law. These state laws may cover all (not just Medicare and Medicaid) patients.

Page 36


Many federal healthcare reform proposals in the past few years have attempted to expand the Stark Law to cover all patients as well. As with the Fraud and Abuse Law, we consider the Stark Law in planning our clinics, marketing and other activities, and believe that our operations are in compliance with the Stark Law. If we violate the Stark Law, our financial results and operations could be adversely affected. Penalties for violations include denial of payment for the services, significant civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

HIPAA

In an effort to further combat healthcare fraud and protect patient confidentially, Congress included several anti-fraud measures in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"). HIPAA created a source of funding for fraud control to coordinate federal, state and local healthcare law enforcement programs, conduct investigations, provide guidance to the healthcare industry concerning fraudulent healthcare practices, and establish a national data bank to receive and report final adverse actions. HIPAA also criminalized certain forms of health fraud against all public and private insurers. Additionally, HIPAA mandates the adoption of standards regarding the exchange of healthcare information in an effort to ensure the privacy and electronic security of patient information and standards relating to the privacy of health information. Sanctions for failing to comply with HIPAA include criminal penalties and civil sanctions. In February of 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA") was signed into law. Title XIII of ARRA, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act ("HITECH"), provided for substantial Medicare and Medicaid incentives for providers to adopt electronic health records ("EHRs") and grants for the development of health information exchange ("HIE"). Recognizing that HIE and EHR systems will not be implemented unless the public can be assured that the privacy and security of patient information in such systems is protected, HITECH also significantly expanded the scope of the privacy and security requirements under HIPAA. Most notable are the new mandatory breach notification requirements and a heightened enforcement scheme that includes increased penalties, and which now apply to business associates as well as to covered entities. In addition to HIPAA, a number of states have adopted laws and/or regulations applicable in the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information that can be more stringent than comparable provisions under HIPAA.

We believe that our current business operations are fully compliant with applicable standards for privacy and security of protected healthcare information. We cannot predict what negative effect, if any, HIPAA/HITECH or any applicable state law or regulation will have on our business.

Other Regulatory Factors

Political, economic and regulatory influences are fundamentally changing the healthcare industry in the United States. Congress, state legislatures and the private sector continue to review and assess alternative healthcare delivery and payment systems. Based upon newly finalized FDA rules, we believe that our PHZIO platform is exempt from Federal Drug Administration ("FDA") regulation. Yet, in the unlikely event that these rules change in the future, the FDA could then require us to seek 510K approvals for our on-line services that could create delays in provisioning our PHZIO services. (See FDA ruling noted below) Also, potential alternative approaches could include mandated basic healthcare benefits, controls on healthcare spending through limitations on the growth of private health insurance premiums, the creation of large insurance purchasing groups, and price controls. Legislative debate is expected to continue in the future and market forces are expected to demand only modest increases or reduced costs. For instance, managed care entities are demanding lower reimbursement rates from healthcare providers and, in some cases, are requiring or encouraging providers to accept capitated payments that may not allow providers to cover their full costs or realize traditional levels of profitability. We cannot reasonably predict what impact the adoption of any federal or state healthcare reform measures or future private sector reform may have on our business.

FDA Ruling: Examples of Mobile App's which it Intends to Exclude from Regulation

On September 25, 2013, the FDA issued Finalized Guidance of medical mobile applications ("Apps"). The FDA has issued a ruling on Apps that may meet the definition of a medical device, but they have determined that they will not exercise enforcement on these Apps. The Guidance contains an appendix that provides examples of mobile apps that MAY meet the definition of medical device but for which FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion. These mobile apps may be intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. Even though these mobile apps may meet the definition of medical device, the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for these mobile apps because they pose lower risk to the public. The FDA understands that there may be other unique and innovative mobile apps that may not be covered in this list that may also constitute healthcare related mobile apps. This list is not exhaustive; it is only intended to provide clarity and assistance in identifying the mobile apps that will not be subject to regulatory requirements at this time. Based on our understanding of the Guidance, although there can be no guarantee, we believe our PHZIO platform will not be subject to regulatory requirements because such services seem to fall within the statutory examples.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016, we had 4 employees and various consultants. We utilize the services of consultants for safety testing, regulatory and legal compliance, and other services.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent of the Company's stock is VStock Transfer LLC, 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, NY 11598, (212) 828-8436.

Page 37


DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Our corporate office is located in Culver City, California. We lease 150 square feet for $500 per month from Evolution Physical Therapy, a company owned by our CEO and we believe that these facilities will be sufficient for the next twelve months. (See "Related Party Transactions" below).

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On February 14, 2017, the Registrant was served by a complaint filed by Rodney Schoemann ("Schoemann") in the State of Louisiana. The lawsuit alleges that the Registrant is indebted to Schoemann under a promissory note (the "Schoemann Note") stemming from four loans to the Registrant in the last 20 months amounting to $75,500 in total original principal bearing interest at 12% per annum, of which $45,202 has been repaid. Nevertheless, Schoemann claims in his lawsuit that, as a result of alleged defaults and extensions of the Schoemann Note, the Registrant is now indebted in the amount of $253,677 inclusive of interest and penalties at an effective rate exceeding 70% per annum, far in excess of the maximum rate allowable in California or Louisiana. The Registrant and its counsel have determined that: (i) Schoemann is not a licensed lender in the State of California, where the loan was made and the $75,500 was deposited and therefore was not permitted under California law to make loans in the State; (ii) the interest rate Schoemann is seeking to collect is usurious and therefore interest claimed in the lawsuit is neither collectible nor enforceable. The Registrant and counsel are of the opinion that the Schoemann suit is wholly without merit and the rules of diversity of jurisdiction apply. Furthermore, we believe that the action should be removed from Louisiana state court to the United States Federal District Court in Baton Rouge, LA, where California law should be applied.

Additionally, from time to time, we may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against us. Although we have not received any other notice that any proceeding or enforcement action has been instituted as of the date of this filing, as further explained elsewhere in this filing, the final comment received from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K that we initially filed on May 6, 2014, was that they were terminating their review of that filing because they continued to have concerns about certain of the issues raised, specifically a Rule 419 violation, that they could not resolve and were going to take further steps they deem appropriate. Please refer to the related discussion in Risk Factors"We may be subject to liability for failure to comply with Rule 419 under the Securities Act"and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, "Contingencies."

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market InformationIntellectual Property

With adequate funding, we anticipate the development of various Application and Pioneering Methods patent protect and Trademark protection associated with our technology platform and unique physical therapy treatments.

REGULATIONS AND HEALTHCARE REFORM

Numerous federal, state and local regulations regulate healthcare services and those who provide them. Some states into which we may expand have laws requiring facilities employing health professionals and providing health-related services to be licensed and, in some cases, to obtain a certificate of need (that is, demonstrating to a state regulatory authority the need for, and financial feasibility of, new facilities or the commencement of new healthcare services). Only one of the states in which we intend to roll out our services requires a certificate of need for the operation of our physical therapy business functions. Our therapists however, are required to be licensed, as determined by the state in which they provide services. Failure to obtain or maintain any required certificates, approvals or licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Diabetes StatisticsState Legislation

Insurance reimbursement for our PHZIO services is likely to improve in 2017 and beyond based upon current draft legislation in Congress that seeks to significantly expand Medicare's reimbursement for telemedicine services including for physical therapy. If passed, this legislation would drive private healthcare insurers to also reimburse for physical therapy associated with telemedicine. Also, in early November 2014, we were advised by the California State Board of Physical Therapy ("CSBPT") that we could operate our PHZIO platform and bill patients' insurance within the Association's rules in the state of California.

Stark Law

Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. Section 1395nn) (the "Stark Law") prohibit referrals by a physician of "designated health services" which are payable, in whole or in part, by Medicare or Medicaid, to an entity in which the physician or the physician's immediate family member has an investment interest or other financial relationship, subject to several exceptions. Unlike the Fraud and Abuse Law, the Stark Law is a strict liability statute. Proof of intent to violate the Stark Law is not required. Physical therapy services are among the "designated health services".According Further, the Stark Law has application to the American Diabetes Association (“ADA”),Company's management contracts with individual physicians and physician groups, as well as, any other financial relationship between us and referring physicians, including any financial transaction resulting from a clinic acquisition. The Stark Law also prohibits billing for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. Several states have enacted laws similar to the dataStark Law. These state laws may cover all (not just Medicare and Medicaid) patients.

Page 36


Many federal healthcare reform proposals in the past few years have attempted to expand the Stark Law to cover all patients as well. As with the Fraud and Abuse Law, we consider the Stark Law in planning our clinics, marketing and other activities, and believe that our operations are in compliance with the Stark Law. If we violate the Stark Law, our financial results and operations could be adversely affected. Penalties for violations include denial of payment for the services, significant civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from the 2011 National Diabetes Fact Sheet (released Jan. 26, 2011) (http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/statistics/Medicare and Medicaid programs.

HIPAA

In an effort to further combat healthcare fraud and protect patient confidentially, Congress included several anti-fraud measures in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"). HIPAA created a source of funding for fraud control to coordinate federal, state and local healthcare law enforcement programs, conduct investigations, provide guidance to the healthcare industry concerning fraudulent healthcare practices, and establish a national data bank to receive and report final adverse actions. HIPAA also criminalized certain forms of health fraud against all public and private insurers. Additionally, HIPAA mandates the adoption of standards regarding the exchange of healthcare information in an effort to ensure the privacy and electronic security of patient information and standards relating to the privacy of health information. Sanctions for failing to comply with HIPAA include criminal penalties and civil sanctions. In February of 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA") was signed into law. Title XIII of ARRA, the overall prevalenceHealth Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act ("HITECH"), provided for substantial Medicare and Medicaid incentives for providers to adopt electronic health records ("EHRs") and grants for the development of diabeteshealth information exchange ("HIE"). Recognizing that HIE and EHR systems will not be implemented unless the public can be assured that the privacy and security of patient information in such systems is protected, HITECH also significantly expanded the scope of the privacy and security requirements under HIPAA. Most notable are the new mandatory breach notification requirements and a heightened enforcement scheme that includes 25.8 million childrenincreased penalties, and adultswhich now apply to business associates as well as to covered entities. In addition to HIPAA, a number of states have adopted laws and/or regulations applicable in the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information that can be more stringent than comparable provisions under HIPAA.

We believe that our current business operations are fully compliant with applicable standards for privacy and security of protected healthcare information. We cannot predict what negative effect, if any, HIPAA/HITECH or any applicable state law or regulation will have on our business.

Other Regulatory Factors

Political, economic and regulatory influences are fundamentally changing the healthcare industry in the United StatesStates. Congress, state legislatures and the private sector continue to review and assess alternative healthcare delivery and payment systems. Based upon newly finalized FDA rules, we believe that our PHZIO platform is exempt from Federal Drug Administration ("FDA") regulation. Yet, in the unlikely event that these rules change in the future, the FDA could then require us to seek 510K approvals for our on-line services that could create delays in provisioning our PHZIO services. (See FDA ruling noted below) Also, potential alternative approaches could include mandated basic healthcare benefits, controls on healthcare spending through limitations on the growth of private health insurance premiums, the creation of large insurance purchasing groups, and price controls. Legislative debate is expected to continue in the future and market forces are expected to demand only modest increases or approximately 8.3%reduced costs. For instance, managed care entities are demanding lower reimbursement rates from healthcare providers and, in some cases, are requiring or encouraging providers to accept capitated payments that may not allow providers to cover their full costs or realize traditional levels of profitability. We cannot reasonably predict what impact the adoption of any federal or state healthcare reform measures or future private sector reform may have on our business.

FDA Ruling: Examples of Mobile App's which it Intends to Exclude from Regulation

On September 25, 2013, the FDA issued Finalized Guidance of medical mobile applications ("Apps"). The FDA has issued a ruling on Apps that may meet the definition of a medical device, but they have determined that they will not exercise enforcement on these Apps. The Guidance contains an appendix that provides examples of mobile apps that MAY meet the definition of medical device but for which FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion. These mobile apps may be intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. Even though these mobile apps may meet the definition of medical device, the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for these mobile apps because they pose lower risk to the public. The FDA understands that there may be other unique and innovative mobile apps that may not be covered in this list that may also constitute healthcare related mobile apps. This list is not exhaustive; it is only intended to provide clarity and assistance in identifying the mobile apps that will not be subject to regulatory requirements at this time. Based on our understanding of the population. In 2007, diabetesGuidance, although there can be no guarantee, we believe our PHZIO platform will not be subject to regulatory requirements because such services seem to fall within the statutory examples.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016, we had 4 employees and various consultants. We utilize the services of consultants for safety testing, regulatory and legal compliance, and other services.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent of the Company's stock is VStock Transfer LLC, 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, NY 11598, (212) 828-8436.

Page 37


DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Our corporate office is located in Culver City, California. We lease 150 square feet for $500 per month from Evolution Physical Therapy, a company owned by our CEO and we believe that these facilities will be sufficient for the next twelve months. (See "Related Party Transactions" below).

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On February 14, 2017, the Registrant was listed asserved by a complaint filed by Rodney Schoemann ("Schoemann") in the underlying cause on 71,382 deaths and was listedState of Louisiana. The lawsuit alleges that the Registrant is indebted to Schoemann under a promissory note (the "Schoemann Note") stemming from four loans to the Registrant in the last 20 months amounting to $75,500 in total original principal bearing interest at 12% per annum, of which $45,202 has been repaid. Nevertheless, Schoemann claims in his lawsuit that, as a contributing factor on an additional 160,022 deaths. This means that diabetes contributed to a totalresult of 231,404 deaths. There were approximately 1.9 million new casesalleged defaults and extensions of diabetes diagnosed in people aged 20 years and older in 2010.

Economic Costs of Diabetesthe Schoemann Note, the Registrant is now indebted in the U.S.amount of $253,677 inclusive of interest and penalties at an effective rate exceeding 70% per annum, far in 2012. Accordingexcess of the maximum rate allowable in California or Louisiana. The Registrant and its counsel have determined that: (i) Schoemann is not a licensed lender in the State of California, where the loan was made and the $75,500 was deposited and therefore was not permitted under California law to make loans in the State; (ii) the interest rate Schoemann is seeking to collect is usurious and therefore interest claimed in the lawsuit is neither collectible nor enforceable. The Registrant and counsel are of the opinion that the Schoemann suit is wholly without merit and the rules of diversity of jurisdiction apply. Furthermore, we believe that the action should be removed from Louisiana state court to the ADA 2012 Economic Study (http://professional.diabetes.org/News_Display.aspx?TYP=9&CID=91943&loc=ContentPage-statistics) the total estimated costs of diagnosed diabetesUnited States Federal District Court in Baton Rouge, LA, where California law should be applied.

Additionally, from time to time, we may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against us. Although we have increased 41%, to $245 billion from $174 billion in 2007. Direct medical costs are $176 billion, which includes costs for hospital and emergency care, office visits, and medications. Indirect medical costs total $69 billion, which includes costs for absenteeism, reduced productivity, unemployment caused by diabetes-related disability, and lost productivity due to early mortality. Medical expenditures for people with diabetes are 2.3 times higher than for those without diabetes. More than 1 in 10 health care dollars in the U.S. are spent directly on diabetes and its complications, and more than 1 in 5 health care dollars in the U.S. goes to the care of people with diagnosed diabetes. The absolute cost of hospital inpatient care for people with diabetesnot received any other notice that any proceeding or enforcement action has risen from $58 billion in 2007 to $76 billion in 2012. However, hospital inpatient care costs have fallen from 50 percent to 43 percent of total direct medical costs.

Diabetes Costs in Specific Populations. According to the ADA (http://professional.diabetes.org/News_Display.aspx?TYP=9&CID=91943&loc=ContentPage-statistics), most of the cost for diabetes care in the U.S., 62.4%, is provided by government insurance (including Medicare, Medicaid, and the military). The rest is paid by private insurance (34.4%) or by the uninsured (3.2%). People with diabetes who do not have health insurance have 79% fewer physician office visits and are prescribed 68% fewer medications than people with insurance coverage, but they also have 55% more emergency department visits than people who have insurance. Total per-capita health care expenditures are lower among Hispanics ($5,930) and higher among non-Hispanic blacks ($9,540) than among non-Hispanic whites ($8,101). Non-Hispanic blacks also have 75% more emergency department visits than the population with diabetesbeen instituted as a whole. Total per-capita health expenditures are higher among women than men ($8,331 vs. $7,458). Compared to non-Hispanic whites, per capita hospital inpatient costs are 41.3% higher among non-Hispanic blacks and 25.8% lower among Hispanics. Among states, California has the largest population with diabetes and thus the highest costs, at $27.6 billion. Although Florida’s total population is 4th among states behind California, Texas, and New York, Florida is 2nd in costs at $18.9 billion.

Diabetes and Exercise. A recent ADA study indicated that 150 minutes of physical activity a week (30 minutes, five times a week) helped prevent or delay type 2 diabetes.http://www.diabetes.org/are-you-at-risk/lower-your-risk/activity.html Paragraph titled “Aerobic Exercise.” In this study, people also lost 10 to 20 pounds by making changes in their eating habitshttp://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/resources.htmsub section “How does the lifestyle intervention help participants prevent type 2 diabetes?”. The Top10 Benefits of Being Active includehttp://www.diabetes.org/food-and-fitness/fitness/physical-activity-is-important.html:

Improved blood glucose management. Activity makes your body more sensitive to the insulin you make and activity also burns glucose (calories). Both actions lower blood glucose.
Lower blood pressure. Activity helps your heart pump stronger and slower.
Improved blood fats. Exercise can raise good cholesterol (HDL) and lower bad cholesterol (LDL) and triglycerides (heart healthy changes).
Reduced insulin or diabetes pills. Activity can lower blood glucose and weight. Both of these may lower the amount of insulin or diabetes pills required.
Weight loss and maintaining loss. Activity burns calories. If you burn enough calories, you’ll trim a few pounds. Stay active and you’ll keep the weight off.
Lower risk for other health problems such as heart attack or stroke, some cancers, and bone loss.
Gain more energy and sleep better.
Reduced stress, anxiety, and depression. Work out or walk off daily stress.
Build stronger bones and muscles. Weight-bearing activities, such as walking, make bones stronger. Strength-training activities makes muscles strong.
Be more flexible. Move easier when you are active.

Diabetes, Exercise & The Affordable HealthCare Act. The diabetes and obesity epidemic in America is on the rise and presents the health care community with a unique opportunity to capitalize on wellness and prevention measures to address the large populations requiring intervention. The Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare) has a provision requiring insurance companies to cover preventative techniques(http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/facts/bystate/publichealth/ppht-map.html and http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/prevention/index.html). Insurance companies understand that preventative measures for this population is not only an effective but also a cost-efficient approach. One of the most efficacious treatments of Type II diabetes and obesity is a prescribed exercise plan. There is an abundance of controlled studies, which demonstrate the benefits of exercise with this patient population. Unfortunately, health information delivered to the patient alone is not an effective approach for successful outcomes. A guided, monitored exercise protocol that holds patients accountable to their health is the best way to achieve results.

Diabetes & Cardiac Physical Therapy. Physical therapists are uniquely trained and experienced in exercise prescription especially with special patient populations such as those with diabetes. The specialty is positioned to be the health care professionals of the future who are responsible for wellness and preventative care in addition to rehabilitation services, which have been historically performed. No other healthcare profession has as much knowledge of proper exercise prescription, biomechanics, posture, and safe execution of occupational and functional tasks as PTs. The diabetic and obese populations have a specific set of complications and considerations with their conditions and PTs are well qualified to deliver education and instruction on effective modes and types of exercise to reduce co-morbidities and improve overall health.

Initial Program Patient Inclusion Criteria

While eWellness hopes to be able to provide assistance to as many people as possible, we do have some requirements for entrance into our program. Each individual must be:

Cleared for cardiovascular exercise.
Covered by private health insurance or federal or state insurance and/or pay the partial or full monthly program fee themselves.
Experiencing some level of back pain and be overweight.
Screened and identified as pre-diabetic or early-stage Type II (NIDDM) diabetes.
Capable of accessing a smart phone or computer with internet access.
Experiencing no neuropathy.

Insurance Company Partnerships

We will also be seeking partnership agreements with various insurance companies that include six of the biggest health insurance companies: WellPoint, CIGNA, Aetna, Humana, United Healthcare and BlueCross BlueShield, although the latter works on a state-by-state basis. The five biggest health insurance companies insure approximately half of the insured population, or well over 100 million people. As of the date of this Registration Statement,filing, as further explained elsewhere in this filing, the final comment received from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K that we initially filed on May 6, 2014, was that they were terminating their review of that filing because they continued to have concerns about certain of the issues raised, specifically a Rule 419 violation, that they could not made any agreementsresolve and were going to take further steps they deem appropriate. Please refer to the related discussion in Risk Factors"We may be subject to liability for failure to comply with any insurance carriers. Once we commence our DMpt program Rule 419 under the Securities Act"and generate at least six monthsManagement's Discussion and Analysis of program patient result data, we will approach activeFinancial Condition and prospective insurance carriers about establishing a tailored reimbursement agreement with us that will cover allResults of our services, including monitored and non-monitored telemedicine sessions and services.Operations, "Contingencies."

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Intellectual Property

With adequate funding, we anticipate the development of various Application and Pioneering Methods patent protect and Trademark protection associated with our technology platform and unique physical therapy treatments.

On April 30, 2015, we filed for a Utility Patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program.

Also on April 4th, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program. A provisional patent is filed without any formal patent claims, oath or declaration, or any information disclosure or prior art statement. Under United States patent law, a provisional application establishes an early filing date for the related invention, but which does not mature into an issued patent unless the applicant files a regular non-provisional patent application within one year. There is no such thing as a “provisional patent”. A provisional application can establish an early effective filing date in one or more continuing patent applications later claiming the priority date of an invention disclosed in earlier provisional applications by one or more of the same inventors.

A “provisional” is automatically abandoned (expires) one year after it is filed. The provisional filing date is not counted as part of the 20-year life of any patent that may issue with a claim to the provisional filing date.

A provisional application, as such, is never examined by the USPTO, and therefore can never become a patent. It is also not “published”, but will become a part of any later non-provisional application file that references it, and thus becomes “public” upon issuance of a patent claiming its priority benefit. We anticipate that we can file an application for a patent within the next 10 months. If approved, of which there can be no guarantee, the patent would provide us with certain level of intellectual property rights to our DMpt system.

REGULATIONS AND HEALTHCARE REFORM

Numerous federal, state and local regulations regulate healthcare services and those who provide them. Some states into which we may expand have laws requiring facilities employing health professionals and providing health-related services to be licensed and, in some cases, to obtain a certificate of need (that is, demonstrating to a state regulatory authority the need for, and financial feasibility of, new facilities or the commencement of new healthcare services). Only one of the states in which we intend to roll out our services requires a certificate of need for the operation of our physical therapy business functions. Our therapists however, are required to be licensed, as determined by the state in which they provide services. Failure to obtain or maintain any required certificates, approvals or licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

State Legislation

Insurance reimbursement for our PHZIO.COMPHZIO services is likely to improve in 20162017 and beyond based upon current draft legislation in Congress that seeks to significantly expand Medicare’sMedicare's reimbursement for telemedicine services including for physical therapy. If passed, this legislation would drive private healthcare insurers to also reimburse for physical therapy associated with telemedicine. Also, in early November 2014, we were advised by the California State Board of Physical Therapy (“CSBPT”("CSBPT") that we could operate our PHZIO.COMPHZIO platform and bill patientspatients' insurance within the Association’sAssociation's rules in the state of California.

Stark Law

Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. §Section 1395nn) (the “Stark Law”"Stark Law") prohibit referrals by a physician of “designated"designated health services”services" which are payable, in whole or in part, by Medicare or Medicaid, to an entity in which the physician or the physician’sphysician's immediate family member has an investment interest or other financial relationship, subject to several exceptions. Unlike the Fraud and Abuse Law, the Stark Law is a strict liability statute. Proof of intent to violate the Stark Law is not required. Physical therapy services are among the “designated"designated health services”services". Further, the Stark Law has application to the Company’sCompany's management contracts with individual physicians and physician groups, as well as, any other financial relationship between us and referring physicians, including any financial transaction resulting from a clinic acquisition. The Stark Law also prohibits billing for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. Several states have enacted laws similar to the Stark Law. These state laws may cover all (not just Medicare and Medicaid) patients.

Page 36


Many federal healthcare reform proposals in the past few years have attempted to expand the Stark Law to cover all patients as well. As with the Fraud and Abuse Law, we consider the Stark Law in planning our clinics, marketing and other activities, and believe that our operations are in compliance with the Stark Law. If we violate the Stark Law, our financial results and operations could be adversely affected. Penalties for violations include denial of payment for the services, significant civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

HIPAA

In an effort to further combat healthcare fraud and protect patient confidentially, Congress included several anti-fraud measures in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”("HIPAA"). HIPAA created a source of funding for fraud control to coordinate federal, state and local healthcare law enforcement programs, conduct investigations, provide guidance to the healthcare industry concerning fraudulent healthcare practices, and establish a national data bank to receive and report final adverse actions. HIPAA also criminalized certain forms of health fraud against all public and private insurers. Additionally, HIPAA mandates the adoption of standards regarding the exchange of healthcare information in an effort to ensure the privacy and electronic security of patient information and standards relating to the privacy of health information. Sanctions for failing to comply with HIPAA include criminal penalties and civil sanctions. In February of 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”("ARRA") was signed into law. Title XIII of ARRA, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”("HITECH"), provided for substantial Medicare and Medicaid incentives for providers to adopt electronic health records (“EHRs”("EHRs") and grants for the development of health information exchange (“HIE”("HIE"). Recognizing that HIE and EHR systems will not be implemented unless the public can be assured that the privacy and security of patient information in such systems is protected, HITECH also significantly expanded the scope of the privacy and security requirements under HIPAA. Most notable are the new mandatory breach notification requirements and a heightened enforcement scheme that includes increased penalties, and which now apply to business associates as well as to covered entities. In addition to HIPAA, a number of states have adopted laws and/or regulations applicable in the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information that can be more stringent than comparable provisions under HIPAA.

We believe that our futurecurrent business operations will beare fully compliant with applicable standards for privacy and security of protected healthcare information. We cannot predict what negative effect, if any, HIPAA/HITECH or any applicable state law or regulation will have on our business.

Other Regulatory Factors

Political, economic and regulatory influences are fundamentally changing the healthcare industry in the United States. Congress, state legislatures and the private sector continue to review and assess alternative healthcare delivery and payment systems. Based upon newly finalized FDA rules, we believe that our planned DMptPHZIO platform is exempt from Federal Drug Administration (“FDA”("FDA") regulation. Yet, in the unlikely event that these rules change in the future, the FDA could then require us to seek 510K approvals for our on-line services that could create delays in provisioning our DMptPHZIO services. (See FDA ruling noted below) Also, potential alternative approaches could include mandated basic healthcare benefits, controls on healthcare spending through limitations on the growth of private health insurance premiums, the creation of large insurance purchasing groups, and price controls. Legislative debate is expected to continue in the future and market forces are expected to demand only modest increases or reduced costs. For instance, managed care entities are demanding lower reimbursement rates from healthcare providers and, in some cases, are requiring or encouraging providers to accept capitated payments that may not allow providers to cover their full costs or realize traditional levels of profitability. We cannot reasonably predict what impact the adoption of any federal or state healthcare reform measures or future private sector reform may have on our business.

FDA Ruling: Examples of Mobile App’sApp's which it Intends to Exclude from Regulation

On September 25, 2013, the FDA issued Finalized Guidance of medical mobile applications (“Apps”("Apps"). The FDA has issued a ruling on Apps that may meet the definition of a medical device, but they have determined that they will not exercise enforcement on these Apps. The Guidance contains an appendix that provides examples of mobile apps that MAY meet the definition of medical device but for which FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion. These mobile apps may be intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. Even though these mobile apps may meet the definition of medical device, the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for these mobile apps because they pose lower risk to the public. The FDA understands that there may be other unique and innovative mobile apps that may not be covered in this list that may also constitute healthcare related mobile apps. This list is not exhaustive; it is only intended to provide clarity and assistance in identifying the mobile apps that will not be subject to regulatory requirements at this time. Based on our understanding of the Guidance, although there can be no guarantee, we believe our DMpt servicesPHZIO platform will not be subject to regulatory requirements at this time because such services seem to fall within the statutory examples.

Employees.

As of the periods ended June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014,2016, we had four4 employees and various consultants. Our employees are neither represented by a union nor subject to a collective bargaining agreement, and we consider our relations with our employees to be favorable. We have entered into certain agreements with our employees regarding their services. We utilize the services of consultants for safety testing, regulatory and legal compliance, and other services.

Legal Proceedings.Transfer Agent

The transfer agent of the Company's stock is VStock Transfer LLC, 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, NY 11598, (212) 828-8436.

Page 37


DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Our corporate office is located in Culver City, California. We lease 150 square feet for $500 per month from Evolution Physical Therapy, a company owned by our CEO and we believe that these facilities will be sufficient for the next twelve months. (See "Related Party Transactions" below).

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On February 14, 2017, the Registrant was served by a complaint filed by Rodney Schoemann ("Schoemann") in the State of Louisiana. The lawsuit alleges that the Registrant is indebted to Schoemann under a promissory note (the "Schoemann Note") stemming from four loans to the Registrant in the last 20 months amounting to $75,500 in total original principal bearing interest at 12% per annum, of which $45,202 has been repaid. Nevertheless, Schoemann claims in his lawsuit that, as a result of alleged defaults and extensions of the Schoemann Note, the Registrant is now indebted in the amount of $253,677 inclusive of interest and penalties at an effective rate exceeding 70% per annum, far in excess of the maximum rate allowable in California or Louisiana. The Registrant and its counsel have determined that: (i) Schoemann is not a licensed lender in the State of California, where the loan was made and the $75,500 was deposited and therefore was not permitted under California law to make loans in the State; (ii) the interest rate Schoemann is seeking to collect is usurious and therefore interest claimed in the lawsuit is neither collectible nor enforceable. The Registrant and counsel are not currently a partyof the opinion that the Schoemann suit is wholly without merit and the rules of diversity of jurisdiction apply. Furthermore, we believe that the action should be removed from Louisiana state court to any litigation. However,the United States Federal District Court in Baton Rouge, LA, where California law should be applied.

Additionally, from time to time, we may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against us. Although we have not received any other notice that any proceeding or enforcement action has been instituted as of the date of this Registration Statement,filing, as further explained elsewhere in this Registration Statement,filing, the final comment received from the SEC regarding the Current Report of Form 8-K that we initially filed on May 6, 2014, was that they were terminating their review of that filing because they continued to have concerns about certain of the issues raised, specifically a Rule 419 violation, that they could not resolve and were going to take further steps they deem appropriate. Please refer to the related discussion in Risk Factors"We may be subject to liability for failure to comply with Rule 419 under the Securities Act”Act"and Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Contingencies.”"Contingencies."

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Our Common Stock became subject to quotation on the OTCQB Market under the symbol EWLL in 2016, an inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities not included on The Nasdaq Stock Market. Quotation of the Company's securities on the OTCQB Market limits the liquidity and price of the Company's Common Stock more than if the Company's shares of Common Stock were listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or a national exchange. For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of Common Stock. The below prices represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

  Price Range 
Period High  Low 
Year Ended December 31, 2016:        
First Quarter $3.00  $2.75 
Second Quarter $4.00  $1.75 
Third Quarter $1.75  $0.03 
Fourth Quarter $0.44  $0.01 
Year Ending December 31, 2017:        

First Quarter

 $0.16  $0.09 

Second Quarter (through April 7, 2017)

 $0.10  $0.09 
         

The transfer agent of our Common Stock is VStock Transfer LLC, 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, NY 11598, (212) 828-8436.

Record Holders. As of April 7, 2017, there were approximately 105 record holders of our Common Stock.

As of March 31, 2017, there are 29,800,645 outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or other instruments convertible into, common equity of the Company.

Dividend Policy. We have neither declared nor paid any cash dividends on either preferred or common stock. For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our preferred or common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon then existing conditions, including its financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects, and other factors that the Board of Directors considers relevant.

Page 38


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans. On July 31, 2015, the Board of Directors approved the 2015 Stock Option Plan, pursuant to which certain directors, officers, employees and consultants will be eligible for certain stock options and grants. The Plan is effective as of August 1, 2015 and the maximum number of shares reserved and available for granting awards under the Plan shall be an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock, provided however that on each January 1, starting with January 1, 2016, an additional number of shares equal to the lesser of (A) 2% of the outstanding number of shares (on a fully-diluted basis) on the immediately preceding December 31 and (B) such lower number of shares as may be determined by the Board or committee charged with administering the plan. This plan may be amended at any time by the Board or appointed plan Committee.

As of the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted a total of 20,250,000 stock options at an average exercise price of $0.27.

Issuance of Unregistered Securities During the Last Three Fiscal Years

Sales of Unregistered Securities in 2014:

On April 30, 2014, we issued 9,200,000 shares pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement.

On May 9, 2014, we issued 400,000 shares pursuant to a consulting agreement valued at $40,000 and 3,000 pursuant to a verbal agreement related to compensation for website services provided to the Company valued at $1,500.

On October 16, 2014, we issued 618,000 shares to two consultants pursuant to consulting agreements valued at $61,800.

On October 16, 2014, we issued 200,000 shares to one of our directors for services valued at $2,000.

On December 23, 2014, we issued $213,337 Series A Senior Convertible Redeemable Notes that are convertible into 609,532 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 609,532 shares of our Common Stock.

Sales of Unregistered Securities in 2015:

On January 24, 2015, we extended the term of an outstanding consulting and service agreement, pursuant to which we issued 400,000 shares valued at $40,000 and 400,000 callable Common Stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share.

On February 23, 2015, we entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters and issued 60,000 shares valued at $6,000.

On April 9, 2015, we issued $270,080 Notes (including an aggregate of $123,980 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) that are initially convertible into 771,657 shares of our Common Stock, pursuant to a private financing; we sold that same amount of Series A Senior Convertible Redeemable Notes convertible into shares of the Company's Common Stock, at $0.35 per share and Series A Warrants, all pursuant to separate Securities Purchase Agreements entered into with each investor. The Warrants are exercisable to purchase up to 771,657 shares of Common Stock.

On May 30, 2015, the Company received $25,000 in exchange for a 90-day promissory note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.35 per share.

On May 20, 2015, the Company issued 250,000 warrants to purchase Common Stock at $.35 per share in connection with a financial advisory services agreement.

On May 20, 2015, the Company signed an strategic advisory services agreement pursuant to which the Company issued 250,000 warrants to purchase Common Stock at $.35 per share.

On July 14, 2015, the Company issued 250,000 shares of Common Stock valued at $.35 per share for conversion of $87,500 of convertible debt.

On July 15, 2015, the Company received $18,000 in exchange for a 90-day promissory note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share.

On August 19, 2015, the Company issuance 96,000 shares valued at $.35 per share for the conversion of $33,600 of convertible debt.

On August 26, 2015, the Company extended the term of the $25,000 promissory note issued on May 30, 2015 that was originally due on August 28 2015 to October 23, 2015. As consideration for the extension the Company agreed to an annual interest rate of 12% retroactive to the original date of the note and issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share.

On September 10, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 663,277 shares valued at $.35 per share for the conversion of $232,147 of convertible debt.

On September 16, 2015, the Company received $2,500 in exchange for a 90-day promissory note at an interest rate of 12% per annum and a risky loan fee of $625. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 50,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share.

Page 39


On September 16, 2015, the Company received $12,500 in exchange for a 90-day promissory note at an interest rate of 12% per annum and a risky loan fee of $3,125. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 250,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share.

On September 16, 2015, the Company received $22,500 in exchange for a 90-day promissory note at an interest rate of 12% per annum and a risky loan fee of $5,625. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 450,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share.

On October 1, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 50,273 shares of Common Stock for the accrued interest on the debt conversions on July 14, 2015, August 19, 2015, and September 10, 2015. The shares were issued at $.35 per share.

On October 5, 2015, the Company extended the term of an $18,000 promissory note originally issued on May 15, 2015 that was originally due on October 13, 2015 to December 14, 2015; however, as consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to repay the note, plus interest and the Loan Fee (as hereinafter defined), upon receipt of additional financing. Interest on the note accrues at the rate of 12% per annum. Unless paid sooner as previously explained, the Company shall pay $4,500 on the maturity date of the note. As additional inducement for the extension, the Company also agreed to issue the lender five-year warrants to purchase up to 150,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at $0.80 per share.

On October 11, 2015, the Company extended the term of an $25,000 promissory note issued on July 15, 2015 that was due on October 23, 2015 to December 14, 2015; however, as a consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to repay the note, plus interest and a risk loan fee of $6,250. As additional inducement for the extension, the Company also agreed to issue the lender five-year warrants to purchase up to 150,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.80 per share.

On October 11, 2015, the Company received $10,000 in exchange for a 60-day promissory note at an interest rate of 12% per annum and a risky loan fee of $2,500. As an inducement for the promissory note, the Company issued 200,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share. The note, accrued interest and risky loan fee is due on December 14, 2015.

On November 11, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 179,988 shares of Common Stock for the conversion of $57,670 of principal and $5,326 of accrued interest. These shares were issued at $.35 per share.

On December 6, 2015, the Company entered into a 90-day Promissory Note for $70,000 at an interest rate of 12% per annum plus a risky loan fee of $17,500 which is being amortized over the term of the loan. As an inducement the Company issued 1,400,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share. The Company further agreed to repay the loan within three days of the Company receiving $500,000 or more in the current private placement of up to $2,500,000 convertible note with warrants. This Promissory Note resulted from the principal payment to the note holder of $28,222 and the holder cancelling the notes originally signed on May 27, 2015 plus extensions, July 15, 2015 plus extensions, September 16, 2015 and October 11, 2015.

On December 11, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an accredited investor for (i) a note in the principal amount of $275,000 at a 10% original issue discount , (ii) a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.80 per share and (iii) 50,000 shares as an additional fee for a value of $5,000.

Sales of Unregistered Securities in 2016:

On January 20, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 50,000 shares for consulting services for a value of $5,000 that is being amortized over twelve months.

On February 29, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 227,232 shares for conversion of convertible debt of $69,500 and accrued interest of $10,031.

On March 3, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 100,000 shares for consulting services for a value of $10,100 that is being amortized over six months.

On March 11, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 150,000 shares for consulting services for a value of $15,000 that is being amortized over twelve months.

On June 2, 2016, the Company sold 120,000 shares of common stock upon receipt of $120,000 cash.

On July 13, 2016, the Company issued 172,958 shares of common stock because of warrants being exercised through a cashless exercise.

On December 14, 2016, the Company issued 90,364 shares of common stock because of warrants being exercised through a cashless exercise.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued a total of 31,419,215 shares of common stock because of debt conversion. The total debt conversion was $191,731.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 935,000 shares of common stock for consulting services. The weighted average price of these shares was $1.44. The value of the shares is being amortized over the life of the contracts ranging from six to twelve months.

The securities issued have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.

Page 40


The Registrant's issuance of the above restricted securities was in reliance upon the exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) and Regulation S promulgated by the SEC under the Act. Unless stated otherwise: (i) the securities were offered and sold only to accredited investors; (ii) there was no general solicitation or general advertising related to the offerings; (iii) each of the persons who received these unregistered securities had knowledge and experience in financial and business matters which allowed them to evaluate the merits and risk of the receipt of these securities, and that they were knowledgeable about our operations and financial condition; (iv) no underwriter participated in, nor did we pay any commissions or fees to any underwriter in connection with the transactions; and, (v) each certificate issued for these unregistered securities contained a legend stating that the securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and setting forth the restrictions on the transferability and the sale of the securities.

Penny Stock Considerations

Our Common Stock will be deemed to be "penny stock" as that term is generally defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to mean equity securities with a price of less than $5.00. Our shares thus will be subject to rules that impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on broker-dealers who engage in certain transactions involving a penny stock.

Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling a penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or accredited investor must make a special suitability determination regarding the purchaser and must receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the sale, unless the broker-dealer is otherwise exempt. Generally, an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 individually or $300,000 together with his or her spouse is considered an accredited investor. In addition, the broker-dealer is required to:

Ÿ Deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt;
Ÿ Disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and our registered representatives and current bid and offer quotations for the securities;
Ÿ Send monthly statements disclosing recent price information pertaining to the penny stock held in a customer's account, the account's value and information regarding the limited market in penny stocks; and
Ÿ Make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction, prior to conducting any penny stock transaction in the customer's account.

Because of these regulations, broker-dealers may encounter difficulties in their attempt to buy or sell shares of our Common Stock, which may affect the ability of Selling Shareholders or other holders to sell their shares in the secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our Common Stock even if our Common Stock becomes publicly traded. In addition, the liquidity for our Common Stock may be decreased, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our Common Stock. Our shares are likely to be subject to such penny stock rules for the foreseeable future.

Page 41


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm43
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 201544
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 201545
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 201546
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 201547
Notes to Financial Statements48

Page 42


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
eWellness Healthcare Corporation

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of eWellness Healthcare Corporation as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. eWellness Healthcare Corporation's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of eWellness Healthcare Corporation as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficit, a deficit in stockholders' equity and has sustained recurring losses from operations. This raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans with regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Haynie & Company

Salt Lake City, Utah

March 31, 2017

F-43

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEETS

  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
       
ASSETS        
         
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash $13,995  $41,951 
Prepaid expenses  723,046   4,053 
         
Total current assets  737,041   46,004 
         
Property & equipment, net  4,279   5,964 
Intangible assets, net  16,908   19,862 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $758,228  $71,830 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $340,793  $248,304 
Accounts payable - related party  379,481   43,717 
Accrued expenses - related party  104,429   33,090 
Accrued compensation  940,000   677,000 
Contingent liability  90,000   90,000 
Convertible debt, net of discount  247,710   309,945 
Derivative liability  8,473,265   2,802 
Short term note and liabilities  180,051   71,605 
         
Total current liabilities  10,755,729   1,476,463 
         
Total Liabilities  10,755,729   1,476,463 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  -   - 
         
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT        
Preferred stock, authorized, 20,000,000 shares, $.001 par value, 0 shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, authorized 400,000,000 shares, $.001 par value, 51,435,307 and 18,170,538 issued and outstanding, respectively  51,435   18,171 
Shares to be issued  110,740   - 
Additional paid in capital  5,757,205   2,033,383 
Accumulated deficit  (15,916,881)  (3,456,187)
         
Total Stockholders' Deficit  (9,997,501)  (1,404,633)
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT $758,228  $71,830 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-44

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
       
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Executive compensation $576,000  $744,000 
General and administrative  309,805   196,354 
Professional fees  2,485,655   459,886 
         
Total Operating Expenses  3,371,460   1,400,240 
         
Loss from Operations  (3,371,460)  (1,400,240)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Gain on extinguishment of debt  2,216,266   11,323 
Gain (loss) on derivative liability  (10,318,969)  - 
Loss on conversion of debt  -   (31,774)
Interest expense, related parties  (4,156)  (3,921)
Interest expense  (981,575)  (129,406)
         
Net Loss before Income Taxes  (12,459,894)  (1,554,018)
         
Income tax expense  (800)  (890)
         
Net Loss $(12,460,694) $(1,554,908)
         
Basic (loss) per share $(0.51) $(0.09)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding  24,267,074   17,214,861 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-45

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

                  Additional     Total 
  Preferred Shares  Common Shares  Shares   Paid in  Accumulated  Stockholders' 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  to be issued  Capital  Deficit  Deficit 
                         
Balance at December 31, 2014  -  $-   16,421,000  $16,421  $-  $1,087,320  $(1,901,279) $(797,538)
                                 
Imputed interest  -   -   -   -   -   3,920   -   3,920 
                                 
Contributed services  -   -   -   -   -   390,000   -   390,000 
                                 
Shares issued for services @ $.10/share  -   -   460,000   460   -   45,540   -   46,000 
                                 
Shares issued for debt conversion @ $.35  -   -   1,239,538   1,240   -   432,599   -   433,839 
                                 
Shares issued for contract @ $.10  -   -   50,000   50   -   4,950   -   5,000 
                                 
Convertible debt discount  -   -   -   -   -   44,189   -   44,189 
                                 
Warrants issued for debt  -   -   -   -   -   7,666   -   7,666 
                                 
Warrants issued for services rendered  -   -   -   -   -   17,199   -   17,199 
                                 
Warrants issued with convertible debt  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   0 
                                 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,554,908)  (1,554,908)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2015  -  $-   18,170,538  $18,171  $-  $2,033,383  $(3,456,187) $(1,404,633)
                                 
Imputed interest  -   -   -   -   -   4,156   -   4,156 
                                 
Contributed services  -   -   -   -   -   306,000   -   306,000 
                                 
Option expense  -   -   -   -   -   544,591   -   544,591 
                                 
Warrants issued with debt  -   -   -   -   -   510,967   -   510,967 
                                 
Shares issued for cash received  -   -   120,000   120   -   119,880   -   120,000 
                                 
Shares issued for debt conversion  -   -   31,646,447   31,646   92,240   231,376   -   355,262 
                                 
Shares issued for prepaid services  -   -   985,000   985   18,500   1,957,365   -   1,976,850 
                                 
Shares issued for services  -   -   250,000   250   -   49,750   -   50,000 
                                 
Shares issued for warrants exercised  -   -   263,322   263   -   (263)  -   0 
                                 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (12,460,694)  (12,460,694)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2016  -  $-   51,435,307  $51,435  $110,740  $5,757,205  $(15,916,881) $(9,997,501)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-46

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
       
Cash flows from operating activities        
Net loss $(12,460,694) $(1,554,908)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  4,639   4,428. 
Contributed services  306,000   390,000 
Shares issued for consulting services  50,000   45,000 
Imputed interest - related party  4,156   3,920 
Options expense  544,591   - 
Amortization of debt discount and prepaids  2,068,243   84,462 
Warrants issued for services  -   16,640 
Debt issued for consulting fees  -   100,000 
Loss on debt conversion  -   31,774 
Loss on derivative liability  10,318,969   - 
Gain on extinguishment of debt  (2,216,266)  - 
         
Changes in operating assets and liabilities        
Advances - related parties  -   7,054 
Prepaid expense  (16,670)  23,780 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  242,177   111,512 
Accounts payable - related party  455,764   (12,439)
Accrued expenses - related party  71,339   2,908 
Accrued compensation  263,000   348,000 
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (364,752)  (397,869)
         
Cash flows from investing activities        
Purchase of equipment  -   (4,207)
Net cash used in investing activities  -   (4,207)
         
Cash flows from financing activities        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  120,000   - 
Proceeds from issuance of debt  -   104,000 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt  250,000   386,100 
Payments on debt  (33,204)  (43,223)
Payments on risky loan fees  -   (3,750)
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  336,796   443,127 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  (27,956)  41,051 
         
Cash, beginning of period  41,951   900 
         
Cash, end of period $13,995  $41,951 
         
Supplemental Information:        
Cash paid for:        
Taxes $-  $- 
Interest Expense $25,000  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-47

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1. The Company

The Company and Nature of Business

eWellness Healthcare Corporation (f/k/a Dignyte, Inc.), (the "Company", "we", "us", "our") was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 7, 2011, to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. The Company has generated no revenues to date. Prior to the Share Exchange Agreement discussed below, other than issuing shares to its original shareholder, the Company never commenced any operational activities.

The eWellness strategy as a first-to-market enterprise in the Physical Therapy based telemedicine industry is to deliver a telemedicine physical therapy service augmenting corporate wellness programs and expand nationally through a Software as a Service (SaaS) business model that enables existing physical therapy practices to extend their offerings via our telemedicine solution. Our objective is to provide Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (PHZIO) Programs to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients and knee and hip surgery rehabilitation. For corporate wellness program our services are designed to deliver significant healthcare savings to the company while charging a very small relative incremental cost.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared to reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these good faith estimates and judgments.

Going Concern

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had no revenues. The Company has an accumulated loss of $15,916,881. In view of these matters, there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's ability to continue operations is dependent upon the Company's ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations, of which there can be no guarantee. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company complies with the accounting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820-10,Fair Value Measurements, as well as certain related FASB staff positions. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact business and considers assumptions that marketplace participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy for measurements of fair value as follows:

Level 1 – quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had the following assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Derivative liability $8,473,265  $-  $-  $8,473,265 
Total liabilities measure at fair value $8,473,265  $-  $-  $8,473,265 
F-48

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at historical cost. Minor additions and renewals are expensed in the year incurred. Major additions and renewals are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows:

Furniture and Fixtures5-7 Years
Computer Equipment5-7 Years
Software3 Years

The Company regularly evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. If factors indicate the asset may not be recoverable, we compare the related undiscounted future net cash flows to the carrying value of the asset to determine if impairment exists. If the expected future net cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized based on the fair value of the asset. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there was no impairment recognized.

Intangible Assets

The Company accounts for assets that are not physical in nature as intangible assets. Intangible assets have either an identifiable or indefinite useful life. Intangible assets with identifiable useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their economic or legal life, whichever is shorter. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are reassessed each year for impairment. If an impairment has occurred, then a loss is recognized. An impairment loss is determined by subtracting the asset's fair value from the asset's book/carrying value.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10-30. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Accounting standards require the consideration of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if it is "more likely than not" that some component or all the benefits of deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Debt Issuance Costs

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB)") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03,Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) ("ASU 2015-03"). ASU-2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. As a result of this new guidance, beginning in 2015 (early adoption), direct and incremental costs associated with the issuance of debt instruments such as legal fees, printing costs, and underwriters' fees, among others, paid to parties other than creditors, are reported and presented as a reduction of debt on the consolidated balance sheets.

Debt issuance costs and premiums or discounts are amortized over the term of the respective financing arrangement using the effective interest method. Amortization of these amounts is included as a component of interest expense net, in the consolidated statements of operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes all cash deposits and highly liquid financial instruments with an original maturity to the Company of three months or less.

Revenue Recognition

The Company has yet to realize revenues from operations. Once the Company has commenced operations, it will recognize revenues when delivery of goods or completion of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers, the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable is probable.

F-49

Loss per Common Share

 

Our eWellness Corporate OfficeThe Company follows ASC Topic 260 to account for the loss per share. Basic loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During periods when common stock equivalents, if any, are anti-dilutive they are not considered in the computation. As the Company has incurred losses for the period ended December 31, 2016, no dilutive shares are added into the loss per share calculations. While currently antidilutive, the following instruments could potentially dilute EPS in the future resulting in the following common stock equivalents.

  2016  2015 
       
Options  15,586,494   - 
Warrants  7,401,556   2,287,764 
Convertible Notes  43,025,637   28,779,215 
   66,013,687   31,066,979 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet adopted, accounting standards in order to determine their effects, if any, on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Based on that review, the Company believes that none of these pronouncements will have a significant effect on its financial statements.

Note 3. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of computer equipment that is locatedstated at cost $8,421 and $4,214 less accumulated depreciation of $4,142 and $2,457 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Depreciation expense was $1,685 and $1,474 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Note 4. Intangible Assets

The Company recognizes the cost of a software license and a license for use of a programming code as intangible assets. The stated cost of these assets was $24,770 and $24,770 less accumulated amortization of $7,862 and $4,908 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the amortization expense recorded was $2,954 and $2,954, respectively.

Note 5. Income Taxes

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Net deferred tax liabilities consist of the following components as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

  2016  2015 
       
Deferred tax assets:        
NOL Carryover $1,490,500  $436,300 
Accrued Payroll  329,000   237,000 
Deferred tax liabilities        
Depreciation  (1,100)  (200)
Valuation allowance  (1.818,400)  (673,100)
Net deferred tax asset $-  $- 
F-50

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 due to the following:

  2016  2015 
       
Book Loss $(4,361,200) $(554,200)
Depreciation  300   (300)
Contributed Services  107,100   136,500 
Meals & Entertainment  6,100   1,300 
Stock for Expense Accounts  14,300   21,600 
Contributed Interest Expense  1,500   1,400 
Gain/Loss on settlement of debt through equity  (775,700)  11,100 
Amortization of debt discount  277,800   19,800 
Accrued Payroll  92,100   121,800 
Loss on derivative  3,611,600   - 
Related Party Interest  1,500   1,400 
Valuation allowance  1,024,600   229,600 
  $-  $- 

At December 31, 2016, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $4,259,000 that may be offset against future taxable income from the year 2017 through 2036. No tax benefit has been reported in the December 31, 2016 financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in future years.

The Company's policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not recognize any interest or penalties, nor did we have any interest or penalties accrued as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 related to unrecognized benefits.

The tax years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 are open for examination for federal income tax purposes and by other major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

Note 6. Related Party Transactions

Through the year ended December 31, 2016, a related party, a company for which the Company's former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO is also serving as CFO, has paid $91,271 on the Company's behalf for various operating expenses. The amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $10,481 and $43,717, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $4,156 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party based on an interest rate of 8%.

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an operating agreement with a physical therapy company ("EPT") which is owned by the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer. Through the agreement, the Company agrees to provide operating capital advances for EPT to offer the Company's PHIZIO platform to physical therapy patients. For accounting and tax purposes, the net profits or losses generated by EPT shall be allocated on a monthly basis. The Company will receive 75% of the net patient insurance reimbursements associated with the operation of the PHIZIO platform.

On November 11, 2016, the Company signed an agreement with a programming company ("PC") within which the one of the Company's directors and Chief Technical Officer is the Chief Marketing Officer. The agreement is for additional features to be programmed for the launch of the PHIZIO platform. The contract specifies that the Company's CEO and CTO will retain their officer and director positions and retain their past due accrued compensation through June 30, 2016. The Company is to pay a monthly base fee of $100,000 for the development and compensation for the Company's CEO and CTO. Following payment of the initial $100,000, the Company is obligated to only pay $50,000 monthly until the PC has successfully signed and collected the first monthly service fee for 100 physical therapy clinics to use the PHIZIO platform. The agreement establishes that the Company is indebted to the PC for $225,000 for past programming services. For this amount, the PC will be issued 25,280,899 common shares at a cost value of $0.0089. These shares will be issued in 2017 when the increase of authorized shares is completed. The PC will also have the right to appoint 40% of the directors. At the end of December 31, 2016, the Company had a payable of $285,000 due to this company.

The Company rents its Culver City, California. We lease 150 square feet for $500 per monthCA office space from Evolution Physical Therapy, a company owned by our CEO. (See “Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters And Certain Control Person” below).The imputed rent expense of $500 per month is recorded in the Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

F-51

Throughout the year ended December 31, 2016, the officers and directors of the Company incur business expenses on behalf of the Company. The amounts payable to the officers as of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $44,429 and $33,089, respectively. There were no expenses due to the board members but the Company has accrued directors' fees of $60,000 and $0 at the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Because the Company is not yet profitable the officers have agreed to defer compensation. The Company had accrued executive compensation of $940,000 and $677,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Note 7. Non-Convertible Notes Payable

On March 14, 2016, the Company issued a 45-day promissory note to a shareholder of $112,550 as an extension for notes with a shareholder dated May 30, 2015, July 15, 2015, September 16, 2015, October 11, 2015, and December 6, 2015. The amount of the note includes interest accrued on the previous notes, risky loan fee and a default fee. The note has an annual interest rate of 12% due and payable on May 1, 2016. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 400,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $794. For the period ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $1,801 of interest expense for this note.

On May 2, 2016, the Company issued a 40-day promissory note to a shareholder of $131,399 as an extension for notes with a shareholder dated May 30, 2015, July 15, 2015, September 16, 2015, October 11, 2015, December 6, 2015 and March 14, 2016. The amount of the note includes interest accrued on the previous notes, risky loan fee and a default fee. The note has an annual interest rate of 12% due and payable on June 10, 2016. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 400,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $1,251,078. For the period ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $1,708 of interest expense for this note.

On June 11, 2016, the Company issued a 30-day promissory note to a shareholder of $152,989 as an extension for notes with a shareholder dated May 30, 2015, July 15, 2015, September 16, 2015, October 11, 2015, December 6, 2015, March 14, 2016 and May 2, 2016. The amount of the note includes interest accrued on the previous notes, risky loan fee and a default fee. The note has an annual interest rate of 12% due and payable on July 13, 2016. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 400,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $587,780. For the period ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $1,632 of interest expense for this note.

On July 14, 2016, the Company issued a 30-day promissory note to a shareholder of $177,762 as an extension for notes with a shareholder dated May 30, 2015, July 15, 2015, September 16, 2015, October 11, 2015, December 6, 2015, March 14, 2016, May 2, 2016, and June 11, 2016. The amount of the note includes interest accrued on the previous notes, risky loan fee and a default fee. The note has an annual interest rate of 12% due and payable on August 15, 2016. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 300,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.50 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $153,776. For the period ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $2,844 of interest expense for this note.

On August 16, 2016, the Company issued a 30-day promissory note to a shareholder of $213,255 as an extension for notes with a shareholder dated May 30, 2015, July 15, 2015, September 16, 2015, October 11, 2015, December 6, 2015, March 14, 2016, May 2, 2016, June 11, 2016 and July 14, 2016. The amount of the note includes interest accrued on the previous notes, risky loan fee and a default fee. The note has an annual interest rate of 18% due and payable on November 14, 2016. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 675,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.50 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $42,427. During the period ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $9,596 of interest expense for this note. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid $33,204 as a principal payment on this promissory note.

On November 14, 2016, the Company made a partial principal payment of $33,204 on the promissory note dated August 16, 2016 that expired on November 14, 2016. As of November 15, 2016, the Company is in default for the remaining balance of $180,051. On February 14, 2017, the Company was served by a complaint filed by Rodney Schoemann ("Schoemann") in the State of Louisiana. The lawsuit alleges that the Company is indebted to Schoemann under a promissory note (the "Schoemann Note") stemming from four loans to the Company in the last 20 months amounting to $75,500 in total original principal bearing interest at 12% per annum, of which $45,202 has been repaid. Nevertheless, Schoemann claims in his lawsuit that, as a result of alleged defaults and extensions of the Schoemann Note, the Company is now indebted in the amount of $253,677 inclusive of interest and penalties at an effective rate exceeding 70% per annum, far in excess of the maximum rate allowable in California or Louisiana. The Company and its counsel have determined that: (i) Schoemann is not a licensed lender in the State of California, where the loan was made and the $75,500 was deposited and therefore was not permitted under California law to make loans in the State; (ii) the interest rate Schoemann is seeking to collect is usurious and therefore interest claimed in the lawsuit is neither collectible nor enforceable. The Company and counsel are of the opinion that the Schoemann suit is wholly without merit and the rules of diversity of jurisdiction apply. Furthermore, we believe that the action should be removed from Louisiana state court to the United States Federal District Court in Baton Rouge, LA, where California law should be applied.

F-52

Note 8. Convertible Notes Payable

During the year ended December 31, 2016, a holder of a note dated December 7, 2015, converted $172,931 of principal into, and the Company issued, 28,779,215 shares of common stock. Following these conversions, the remaining amount of the note of $112,069 and accrued interest of $12,931 was purchased by an accredited investor for $125,000. (Described below as the note issued on November 14, 2016). At the year ended December 31, 2016, this note was cancelled.

On February 29, 2016, a holder of a note dated December 23, 2014, converted into, and the Company issued, 227,232 shares of common stock. The Company has accrued $10,031 in interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On November 14, 2016, the Company signed a contractconvertible note in which the note holder agreed to pay for short term office servicesthe cancellation of $125,000 of the remaining balance of the convertible note payable dated December 7, 2015. The Company recorded $125,000 in debt discount for this note. The terms of the convertible note will be the same as the original note which are that interest is payable at 8% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $1,306 of interest expense. During the month of December 2016, the holder of the note converted $18,800 to 4,700,000 shares of common stock. The number of shares issued before the end of the year was 2,640,000. The value of the remaining unissued shares was recorded in the account Shares to be Issued.

On November 14, 2016, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Regus Management Group, LLC, (Regus)an accredited investor for a note in New York City, but never physically occupied the spaceprincipal amount of $275,000 at a 10% original issue. The note has a provision for 8% interest to be accrued until paid or converted into shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $2,872 of interest expense.

Note 9. Equity Transactions

The Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada for the purposes of: (A) increasing its authorized capital stock from 110,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (i) 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, to 420,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (iii) 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (iv) 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001.

Preferred Stock

With the provider cancelledCertificate of Amendment filed, noted above, the contracttotal number of shares of preferred stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 20,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. There have been no preferred shares issued as of December 31, 2016.

Common Stock

With the Certificate of Amendment filed, noted above, the total number of shares of common stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 400,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held at all stockholders' meetings for all purposes including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

No holder of shares of stock of any class is entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for or purchase or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class or of securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of dividend.

On June 2, 2016, the Company sold 120,000 shares of common stock upon receipt of $120,000 cash. With this stock purchase agreement, the Company authorized the issuance of 60,000 warrants at an exercise price of $1.50 per share.

F-53

On various dates from August 31, 2016 to November 14, 2016, the Company issued a total of 28,779,215 shares of common stock per debt conversion of the convertible note dated December 7, 2015. The total value of the debt conversion was $172,931. The shares were issued at an average price of $.006 per share.

On December 1, 2016, the Company agreed to convert $120,000 of accounts payable for two vendors into common stock at $.50 per share for a total of 2,400,000 shares. With this agreement, the Company also issued 1,200,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The fair value of these warrants is $576. The 1,400,000 shares of common stock were issued in the first quarter of 2017. The remaining 1,000,000 will be issued in the second quarter of 2017.

During the month of December 2016, the Company issued a total of 2,640,000 shares of common stock per debt conversion of the convertible note dated November 2014. While14, 2016. The total of the debt conversion was $18,400. At the year ended December 31, 2016, there are 2,060,000 of additional shares of common stock yet to be issued per the debt conversion documents.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 29,006,447 shares of common stock for the conversion of convertible debt of $242,431 and accrued interest of $10,031.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 985,000 shares of common stock for consulting services. The weighted average price of these shares was $27,994$1.44 The value of services payments payablethe shares is being amortized over the life of the contracts ranging from six to Regus attwelve months.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 263,322 shares of common stock for the cashless exercise of warrants issued with convertible notes dated December 7, 2015.

As of the period ended December 31, 20142016, the Company has 51,435,307 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

On February 22, 2016, the Company received the common stock trading symbol of EWLL.

Warrants

On June 10, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 100,000 warrants that were issued as part of the extension of a convertible note dated December 7, 2015. These warrants were exercised as a cashless exercise on December 31, 2016 and 90,364 shares of common stock.

On July 12, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 300,000 warrants to be issued as part of the extension of a convertible note dated December 7, 2015. The fair value of the warrants is $79,677.

On July 13, 2016, the 250,000 warrants issued as part of the convertible note dated December 7, 2015 were exercised as a cashless exercise for the issuance of 172,958 shares of common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued a total of 2,175,000 warrants to induce the extension of non-convertible notes payable. These warrants had various exercise prices and issue dates. These warrants along with previously issued warrants to this debt holder were amended and the exercise prices were reduced to $.004 per share. As a result of these amendments the Company recognized a derivative liability of $1,064,620 at December 31, 2016.

F-54

The following is a summary of the status of the Company's warrants as of December 31, 2016 and changes on that end date:

      Weighted 
   Number of  Average 
   Warrants  Exercise Price 
Outstanding at January 1, 2015   609,533  $0.18 
Granted   5,021,658  $0.11 
Exercised   -  $- 
Cancelled   -  $- 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015   5,631,191  $0.11 
Granted   3,835,000  $0.40 
Exercised   350,000  $0.86 
Cancelled   -  $- 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016   9,116,190  $0.21 

For purpose of determining the fair market value of the warrants and options issued during the year ended December 31, 2016, we used the Black Scholes option valuation model. These valuations were done throughout the period ended June 30 ,at the date of issuance and not necessarily as of the reporting date. The significant assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation of the date of issuance are as follows:

Stock price on the valuation date$.0345 - $.18
Exercise price of warrants$.004 and $1.00
Dividend yield0.00%
Years to maturity1-5
Risk free rate.53% - 1.32
Expected volatility57.18% - 63.40%

Stock Option Plan

On August 6, 2015, the Company mitigatedBoard of Directors approved the liability by introducing2015 Stock Option Plan, pursuant to which certain directors, officers, employees and consultants will be eligible for certain stock options and grants. The Plan is effective as of August 1, 2015 and the maximum number of shares reserved and available for granting awards under the Plan shall be an alternate user foraggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock, provided however that on each January 1, starting with January 1, 2016, an additional number of shares equal to the space and ultimately settledlesser of (A) 2% of the outstanding debtnumber of shares (on a fully-diluted basis) on the immediately preceding December 31 and (B) such lower number of shares as may be determined by the Board or committee charged with administering the plan. This plan may be amended at any time by the Board or appointed plan Committee.

On February 19, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 2,850,000 stock options under this plan to selected employees, directors and consultants. The stock options vest immediately upon the grant date and authorize the recipient to purchase shares of common stock at $.80 per share within five years of the grant date. The Company valued the issuance of these options using the Black Scholes valuation model assuming a payment.84% risk free rate and 61.4% volatility. At the year ended December 31, 2016, the vested value of $5,500 onthe options was $4,633. This was recorded as stock option compensation expense.

On April 24, 2015.15, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of stock options under this plan to a consultant. The 250,000 stock options vested immediately upon the grant date and authorized the recipient to purchase shares of common stock at $1.00 per share within five years of the grant date. The Company valued the issuance of these options using the Black Scholes valuation model assuming a .53% risk free rate and 57.2% volatility. At the year ended December 31, 2016, the vested value of $503,762 was expensed as stock option expense.

Our eWellness OLPT Operational Office Space Model calls for approximately 500 square feetOn December 9, 2016, the Board of office space withDirectors authorized the issuance of stock options under this plan to selected employees, directors and consultants. The 19,150,000 stock options vested immediately upon the grant date and authorized the recipient to purchase shares of common stock at $.17 per share within five years of the grant date. The Company valued the issuance of these options using the Black Scholes valuation model assuming a net per square foot rental price.53% risk free rate and 57.2% volatility. At the year ended December 31, 2016, the vested value of approximately $1 per square foot per month. Required tenant improvements would be added to$40,829 was expensed as stock option compensation expense.

F-55

The following is a summary of the rent. We anticipate a 1-year lease with one 1-year renewal option. These offices were occupiedstatus of all Company's stock options as of December 31, 2016 and changes during the period ended December 31, 2014.end date:

   Number  Weighted 
   of Stock  Average 
   Options  Exercise Price 
Outstanding at January 1, 2016   -  $- 
Granted   20,250,000  $0.27 
Exercised   -  $- 
Cancelled   -  $- 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016   20,250,000  $0.27 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2016   20,250,000  $0.27 

Note 10. Commitments, Contingencies

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement dated May 2014 was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 ("Rule 419") of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a "Blank Check" offering subject to Rule 419 (the "Rule 419 Offering") and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We have located multiple locationsused 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in Los Angeles that meet our criteria, butthe escrow trust as of the date of this Registration Statement, havethe closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the "Trust Account Balance").

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties' efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A ("Form 8A") to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the "Converted Offering"), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company's restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the "Consent") rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), "funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement]." As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document (which was essentially a form of rescission) was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any lease. All tenant improvements willinvestor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be partreturned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

F-56

As disclosed therein, we filed the amendments to the initial Form 8-K in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to an alleged violation of Rule 419. The Company continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, but was unable to satisfy the SEC's concerns. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

Because of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. Because of our monthly lease payment. The anticipated costfailure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible now to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining now the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. Considering the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company's Balance Sheet for the computers, software packages telephone system, routers, cabling, racking, servers and equipment and supplies is approximately $100,000 to provision services by one PTA on one DMpt platform.

Available Information

We are$90,000 that was subject to the informational requirementsConsent.

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The rental agreement provides for the value of the Securities Exchange Actrent of 1934$500 per month be recorded as contributed towards the founding eWellness and its operations. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we have recorded this rent payment in accordance therewith, file reportsthe Statements of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital on the Balance Sheet.

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy ("EPT"), a company owned by one of the Company's officers, wherein it is agreed that EPT would be able to operate the Company's telemedicine platformwww.phzio.com and offer it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. The Company is to receive 75% of the net insurance reimbursements from the patient for use of the platform. The Company will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating thewww.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments – computer equipment, office or facilities rental payments, physical therapist or physical therapy assistant, administrative staff, patient induction equipment, office supplies, utilities and other information with the SEC. Our reports and other information filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can also be obtained from the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. The public may obtain information onassociated operating costs. It is anticipated that the operation of the Public Reference Roomplatform by callingEPT will generate positive cash flow within 90 days from the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.start of patient induction.

On May 20, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Mavericks Capital Securities LLC ("Mavericks"). The term of the contract begins on the effective date and can be terminated within 30 days upon written notice by either party. The Company is to pay Mavericks a monthly retainer fee of $10,000 that is deferred until the Company raises $250,000 in new investor funds from the effective date. In addition, the SEC maintainsCompany granted Mavericks 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share. On September 28, 2015, the Company and Mavericks entered into an amendment to the consultant agreement pursuant to which Mavericks will also assist the Company in the acquisition of new customers, for which the Company shall pay Mavericks 10% of the revenue received by the Company, net of any pass-through costs, from any such customers introduced to the Company by Mavericks; payment shall be made upon the Company's receipt of such revenues. In the amendment, the parties also further clarified the definition of Customer Acquisition.

F-57

On January 20, 2016, the Company entered into a Web siteone year agreement with a consulting firm to provide marketing and financial media awareness services. Compensation for this agreement is the issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock – 50,000 were issued at the signing of the agreement and the other 50,000 are to be issued in July 2016. The agreement was terminated and the additional shares were not issued. The value of these shares is $5,000 for each issuance which is being amortized over the term of the contract.

On March 14, 2016, the Company authorized a 45-day Promissory Note Extension at an interest rate of 12% per annum. As an inducement for this extension of previous promissory notes, the Company issued 400,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $794. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $1,801 of accrued interest for this note.

On April 13, 2016, we entered into a one-year renewable advisory agreement with Dan Mills, MPT to become the Company's chairman of the to-be-formed committee known as the eWellness Physical Therapy Clinical Advisory Board and to act as the Company's national spokesperson at the American Physical Therapy Association ("APTA").

As inducement for Mr. Mills to enter the Agreement, we agreed to issue 250,000 immediately vesting common stock purchase warrants at a price of $1.00 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $503,762. The common stock underlying the warrants has piggy-back registration rights. In addition, 10,000 shares of common stock were issued with a value of $30,000. Per the agreement, Mr. Mills will receive $0.50 cents per PHZIO session that contains reportsan APTA member uses and $500 per month in consulting fees.

On May 2, 2016, the Company issued a 40-day promissory note to a shareholder of $131,399 as an extension for notes with a shareholder dated May 30, 2015, July 15, 2015, September 16, 2015, October 11, 2015, December 6, 2015 and March 14, 2016. The amount of the note includes interest accrued on the previous notes, risky loan fee and a default fee. The note has an annual interest rate of 12% due and payable on June 10, 2016. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 400,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $1,251,078. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $1,708 of interest expense for this note.

On May 23, 2016, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with a financial advisory consultant. Compensation for this agreement is the issuance of 450,000 shares of common stock that vest on January 2, 2017. The value of these shares is $1,669,500 and is being amortized over the term of the contact.

On June 11, 2016, the Company issued a 30-day promissory note to a shareholder of $152,989 as an extension for notes with a shareholder dated May 30, 2015, July 15, 2015, September 16, 2015, October 11, 2015, December 6, 2015, March 14, 2016 and May 2, 2016. The amount of the note includes interest accrued on the previous notes, risky loan fee and a default fee. The note has an annual interest rate of 12% due and payable on July13, 2016. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 400,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $578,780. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $1,632 of interest expense for this note.

F-58

On July 5, 2016, the Company entered into a six-month agreement with an investment and business consultant for certain investment and business matters. Compensation for this agreement was the issuance of 125,000 shares of common stock which have been issued at the value of $218,750. This was amortized over the life of the contract.

On July 8, 2016, the Company entered into a five-year business development agreement with a consultant for marketing the Company's telemedicine platform to its customers. Upon the completion of a partnership for the Company with a large-scale California employer and/or one of its affiliate institutions that includes at least a 100-patient pilot study, the Company agrees to issue 50,000 $1.00 common stock 5-year purchase warrants. For each additional licensing of 20 physical therapy professionals through the consultant, the Company will issue an additional 50,000 common stock 5-year purchase warrants priced at market at the time of issuance. For any direct investor introduced by the consultant, the Company will pay a 5% cash fee on the gross amount invested.

On November 8, 2016, the Company signed an assumption agreement wherein the holder of the agreement would fund the payment of the remaining balance of a convertible note dated December 7, 2015 in the amount of $125,000. The note has an interest rate of 8% and the Company recorded $1,306 of accrued interest during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On November 11, 2016, the Company signed an agreement with a programming company ("PC") within which the one of the Company's directors and Chief Technical Officer is the Chief Marketing Officer. The agreement is for additional features to be programmed for the launch of the PHIZIO platform. The contract specifies that the Company's CEO and CTO will retain their officer and director positions and retain their past due accrued compensation through June 30, 2016. The Company is to pay a monthly base fee of $100,000 for the development and compensation for the Company's CEO and CTO. Following payment of the initial $100,000, the Company is obligated to only pay $50,000 monthly until the PC has successfully signed and collected the first monthly service fee for 100 physical therapy clinics to use the PHIZIO platform. The agreement establishes that the Company is indebted to the PC for $225,000 for past programming services. For this amount, the PC will be issued 25,280,899 common shares at a cost value of $0.0089. These shares will be issued in 2017 when the increase of authorized shares is completed. The PC will also have the right to appoint 40% of the directors.

On November 14, 2016, the Company signed a senior convertible note for the principal sum of $275,000 with an actual amount of $250,000 and a 10% original issue discount. The note expires on May 14, 2017 and has an interest rate of 8%. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $2,872 of accrued interest.

On December 2, 2016, the Company signed agreements for the conversion of debt to equity conversion of $120,000 debt for units. Each unit is comprised of (1) 200,000 shares of common stock at $.05 per share and (2) a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 for a period of three years. None of the shares were issued by the year ended December 31, 2016. The value of the shares was recorded in Shares to be Issued.

From time to time the Company may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. Except as may be outlined above, the Company believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

F-59

Note 11. Derivative Valuation

The Company evaluated the convertible debentures and associated warrants in accordance with ASC Topic815, "Derivatives and Hedging," and determined that the conversion feature of the convertible promissory notes were not afforded the exemption for conventional convertible instruments due to their variable conversion rates. The notes have no explicit limit on the number of shares issuable so they did not meet the conditions set forth in current accounting standards for equity classification. In addition, the warrants have a Most Favored Nations clause resulting in the exercise price of the warrants also not being fixed. Therefore, these have been characterized as derivative instruments. We elected to recognize the notes under paragraph 815-15-25-4, whereby there would be a separation into a host contract and derivative instrument. We elected to initially and subsequently measure the notes and warrants in their entirety at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.

The debt discount is amortized over the life of the note and recognized as interest expense. For the years ended December 31,2016 and 2015, we amortized the debt discount of $793,716 and $30,765, respectively, to interest expense. The derivative liability is adjusted periodically according to stock price fluctuations and other information regarding registrantsinputs and was $8,473,265 and $2,802 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had the following activity in the derivative liability account.

  Notes  Warrants  Total 
Derivative liability at December 31, 2014 $-  $-  $- 
Derivative liability at issuance of warrants  -   2,802   2,802 
Loss on derivative liability  -   -   - 
Derivative liability at December 31, 2015  -   2,802   2,802 
Addition of new conversion option derivatives  773,019   1,278,645   2,051,664 
Change in fair value  8,693,964   (172,009)  8,521,955 
Reclassification of derivative to gain on extinguishment of debt  (2,103,156)  -   (2,103,156)
Derivative liability at December 31, 2016  $7,363,827  $1,109,438  $8,473,265 

For purposes of determining the fair market value of the derivative liability , the Company used Black Scholes option valuation model. The significant assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation of the derivative are as follows:

Stock price at valuation date$.0260
Exercise price of warrants$.01658
Risk free interest rate.245%
Stock volatility factor34.054%
Years to Maturity.12329
Expected dividend yieldNone

Note 12. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had the following non-cash investing and financing activities:

Accrued interest of $3,848 and $3,980 was rolled into short-term notes and convertible debt, respectively.
$20,000 of short-term notes was transferred to convertible debt.
Issued 4,121,658 warrants valued at $7,666 as incentive for lenders to enter debt agreements.
Increased derivative liability and debt discount by $2,802 for warrant issued debt.
Increased debt discount by $44,189 for the value of the cash conversion feature on debt.
Increased debt discount by $25,000 for an Original Issue Discount on debt.
Increased debt discount by $10,000 for debt issuance costs.
Issued $5,000 of stock as incentive for a lender to enter a debt agreement.
Agreed to pay $40,125 and $5,000 in risky loan fees on short-term notes and convertible debt, respectively.
Transferred $6,500 from account payable to short term notes.
Issued 1,239,538 shares of common stock valued at $433,839 for the extinguishment of $410,917 worth of debt and $22,922 worth of accrued interest.
Issued 540,000 warrants for services valued at $17,199, of which $599 was recorded as a prepaid and $61,640 was recorded as warrants for services.
Issued 460,000 shares of common stock valued at $45,540, of which $1,000 was recorded as a prepaid and $45,000 was recorded as stock for services.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company had the following non-cash investing and financing activities:

Accrued interest of $125,755 and $12,931 was rolled into short-term notes and convertible debt, respectively.
Increased derivative liability by $346,812 for convertible debt
Issued 3,835,000 warrants valued at $510,167 as incentive for lenders to enter debt agreements.
Increased derivative liability and debt discount by $152,035 for warrant issued debt.
Increased debt discount by $35,000 for an Original Issue Discount on debt.
Authorized 2,400,000 shares of stock to be issued for payables conversion totaling $120,000
Authorized issuance of 450,000 shares of stock to be issued for prepaid
Issued 31,646,447 shares of common stock for the extinguishment of $261,231 worth of debt and $10,031 worth of accrued interest.  There are to be an additional 2,060,000 shares to be issued for the debt conversion
Issued 985,000 shares of common stock valued at $1,958,350 which was recorded as a prepaid

Note 13. Subsequent Events

In January 2017, the Company authorized a convertible note financing of $110,000. The convertible notes convert into common stock of the Company at conversion price into which any principal amount and interest (including any default interest) under the notes shall be convertible into shares of common stock shall be equal to the lesser of: (i) $0.20 or (ii) 75% of the average of the VWAPs for the five (5) Trading Days immediately following the 180th calendar day after the Original Issue Date, whichever is lower. There is only one pricing lookback event. The notes have a 10% original issue discount and an interest rate of 8%.

In January 2017, 1,363,347 warrants were exercised as a cashless exercise for the issuance of 1,336,075 shares of common stock.

On January 17, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for a six-month period to provide services which will include: (i) introductions to brokers; (ii) assist with research coverage; (iii) introductions to over 100 funds, investment banking firms and market makers; and (iv) a presentation speaking slot with a Gold sponsorship at the 2017 Wall Street Conference. In consideration for the services, the Company agreed to 75,000 restricted shares of common stock. These shares have not yet been issued.

On January 19, 2017, the Company issued 700,000 shares of common stock per two separate agreements with consultants signed in December 2016. 

On January 19, 2017, the Company issued 1,400,000 shares of common stock per one of the extinguishment of debt agreements dated December 1, 2016.

On January 24, 2017, the Registrant entered into a Definitive Service Agreement ("DSA") with Bistromatics, a company for which the Company's officer serves as an officer, affirming that file electronicallythe Company does not currently have enough authorized shares of common stock, based upon the number of issued and outstanding shares together with shares reserved for issuance, to issue Bistromatics 25,280,899 shares of common stock. As a result, the Company and Bistromatics agreed that the Company shall issue 2,528,089 shares of a newly authorized Series A Preferred Stock to Bistromatics; each share of which shall: (i) have 20 votes per share on all matters submitted to the vote of the holders of the Company's voting capital stock (i.e.: 50,577,980 share voting rights); and (ii) be convertible into 10 shares of the Company's existing shares of common stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Series A Preferred Stock are convertible into shares of common stock inasmuch as the Company has filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to increase its authorized shares of common stock from 100 million shares, par value $0.001 per share to 400 million shares, par value $0.001per share. At the date of filing the Articles of Amendment, the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock must be converted into 25,280,899 shares of the Company's common stock. This transaction has not yet been completed. In connection with the SEC.Company's obligations under the DSA, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada for the purposes of: (A) increasing its authorized capital stock from 110,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (i) 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, to 420,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (iii) 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (iv) 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001. The addressCertificate of the SEC’s Web site is http://www.sec.gov.

We haveAmendment has been filed with the State of Nevada and the Company has filed an Information Statement on Schedule 14C, based upon the Joint Written Consent of the Company's Board of Directors and the Majority Consenting Stockholders and implementing a reverse split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, including shares of common stock reserved for issuance, in a ratio to be determined by the Company's Board of Directors, not to exceed a one-for-twenty (1:20) basis (the "Reverse Split"). After the Information Statement clears comments with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company must submit an application to and receive approval from FINRA for these corporate actions.

F-61

During the first quarter of 2017, the Company issued a total of 11,460,000 shares of common stock per debt conversion of the convertible note dated November 14, 2016. The total of the debt conversion was $47,000. There is 2,350,000 of additional shares of common stock yet to be issued per the debt conversion documents.

In February 2017, the Board of Directors of unanimously approved an amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation to: (A) increase its authorized capital stock from 110,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (i) 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, to 420,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (iii) 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (iv) 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001; and (B) implement a reverse split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, including shares of common stock reserved for issuance, in a ratio to be determined by the Company's Board of Directors, not to exceed a one-for-twenty (1:20) basis. The Certificate of Amendment was authorized and approved by the Joint Written Consent of the Board of Directors and Majority Consenting Stockholders of the Company.

In February 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a third party which required the Company to issue two 5.5% convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $165,000, each at $82,500. Each of the notes contain a 10% Original Issue Discount and an interest rate of 8%. The due date of the notes is August 9, 2017.

In February 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a third party which required the issuance of a convertible note for $55,000 plus a 10% Original Issue Discount. The terms of this note are the same as the notes dated January 11 and January 31, 2017, which are that the convertible notes convert into common stock of the Company at conversion price into which any principal amount and interest (including any default interest) under the notes shall be convertible into shares of common stock shall be equal to the lesser of: (i) $0.20 or (ii) 75% of the average of the VWAPs for the five (5) trading days immediately following the 180th calendar day after the Original Issue Date, whichever is lower. There is only one pricing look back event. The notes have a 10% original issue discount and an interest rate of 8%. The due date of the notes is August 14, 2017.

In February 2017, the Company and an institutional investor entered into an agreement in which: (a) the investor agreed to fund up to $5,000,000 in reliance upon an exception provided under Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities act of 1933, as amended; (b) the Company will file a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC within 15 days after the Company files its annual 10K report for the year ended December 31, 2016; (c) the Company issued a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000, bearing interest at 8%; and (d) the Company issued a second convertible note in the principal amount of $275,000 bearing interest at 8% of which $105,000 was initially funded. With the $275,000 convertible note, the Company also issued 68,750 cashless warrants exercisable at $.25 per share.

In February 2017, the Company was served by a complaint filed by the holder of a note payable. The lawsuit alleges that the Company is indebted to the note holder a promissory note stemming from four loans to the Company during the last 20 months amounting to $75,500 in total original principal bearing interest at 12% per annum, of which $45,202 has been repaid. Further, the note holder claims that, because of alleged defaults and extensions of the notes, the Company is now indebted in the amount of $253,677 inclusive of interest and penalties at an effective rate exceeding 70% per annum, far more than the maximum rate allowable in California or Louisiana. The Company and its counsel have determined that: (i) the note holder is not a licensed lender in the State of California, where the loan was made and the $75,500 was deposited and therefore was not permitted under California law to make loans in the State; and (ii) the interest rate the note holder is seeking to collect is usurious and therefore interest claimed in the lawsuit is neither collectible nor enforceable. The Company and counsel believe the lawsuit is wholly without merit and the rules of diversity of jurisdiction apply. Furthermore, the Company believes that the action should be removed from Louisiana state court to the United States Federal District Court in Baton Rouge, LA, where California law should be applied.

In April 2017, the Company issued 2,350,300 shares of Common Stock to EWLL Acquisition Partners in connection with the conversion of debt into equity. In addition, the Company agreed to convert the Series A Preferred Shares held by Bistromatics into 25,280,899 shares of Common Stock. In January 2017, the Company issued 75,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to Lyons Capital LLC; 250,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to Richard E. Barsom and 1,000,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to Summit Capital for consulting services.

Page 62


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND PLAN OF OPERATIONS

The following plan of operation provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read along with our financial statements and notes thereto. This section includes a number of  forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which refer to future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our predictions.

Overview

eWellness is in the initial phase of developing a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program ("PHZIO program") to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic.

Initially, our focus was on patients with pre-diabetes conditions. However, we have broadened our focus to include overweight patients saddled with lower back pain and knee pain caused by tissue strain and inactivity. We also decided to launch our platform in Los Angeles instead of New York after Blue Shield of California reimbursed our physical therapy telemedicine. We were poised to launch our business in New York through a partnership with Millennium Healthcare, Inc. ("MHI"), but the partnership did not provide the results we were expecting. Additionally, management determined that relocating the Company's operations closer to where the CEO and Chairman lived made the business more manageable and avoided time and monies lost due to travel. Management believes that by broadening the Company's focus to include lower back pain and knee pain caused from excess weight, provides additional opportunities for success. The Company remains committed to servicing patients diagnosed as pre-diabetes as well.

Recent Developments

On November 12, 2016, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. (the "Bistromatics Agreement"), a Company incorporated under the laws of Canada ("Bistromatics"). Pursuant to the Bistromatics Agreement, Bistromatics will provide operational oversight of the Company's Phzio System including development, content editing, client on boarding, clinic training, support & maintenance, billing, hosting and oversight and support of CRM and helpdesk system. The Company has agreed to pay a monthly base fee of $50,000 monthly until Bistromatics has successfully signed and collected the first monthly service fee for 100 Physical Therapy Clinics to start using our Platform. If and when Bistromatics provides the Company with evidence of the 100 Physical Therapy Clinics, the monthly service fee will extend to $100,000. Bistromatics will have the ability to convert any outstanding amounts that fall in arrears for 60 days into common stock at the same terms as the next round of financing or the Company's common stock market price, whichever is higher.

Investment Agreement with Tangiers Global, LLC

On February 14, 2017, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with Tangiers. Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement, Tangiers committed to purchase up to $5,000,000 of the Company's common stock over a period of up to 36 months. From time to time during the 36-month period commencing from the effectiveness of the registration statement, we may deliver a put notice to Tangiers which states the dollar amount that we intend to sell to Tangiers on a date specified in the put notice. The maximum investment amount per notice must be no more than 200% of the average daily trading dollar volume of our Common stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately prior to date of the applicable put notice and such amount must not exceed an accumulative amount of $250,000. The minimum put amount is $5,000. The purchase price per share to be paid by Tangiers will be the 80% of the of lowest trading prices of the Common stock during the 5 trading days including and immediately following the date on which put notice is delivered to Tangiers.

In connection with the Investment Agreement with Tangiers, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with Tangiers.

Plan of Operations

Our business model is to license our PHZIO ("PHZIO") platform to any physical therapy ("PT") clinic in the U.S. and or have large-scale employers use our PHZIO platform as a fully PT monitored corporate wellness program.

The Company's initial licensee is Evolution Physical Therapy ("EPT"), which is owned by our CEO, Darwin Fogt, MPT. All treatment revenue for 2015 and 2016 was reimbursed to EPT, but was not sufficient to generate sales for the Company. The Company is in the process of developing marketing channel partnerships with industry association members, existing software-based telemedicine providers and physical therapy billing and practice management providers. These partnerships, if completed, are anticipated to begin adding third party PT licensee revenue during the second quarter of 2017.

The Company's PHZIO home physical therapy exercise platform has been designed to disrupt the $30 billion physical therapy and the $8 billion corporate wellness industries. PHZIO re-defines the way physical therapy can be delivered. PHZIO is the first real-time remote monitored 1-to-many physical therapy platform for home use. Due to the real-time patient monitoring feature, the PHZIO platform is insurance reimbursable by payers such as: Anthem Blue Cross, AETNA and Blue Shield.

Page 53


The PHZIO Solution: A New Physical Therapy Delivery System

SaaS technology platform solution for providers bundling rehabilitation services and employer wellness programs;
First real-time remote monitored 1-to-many physical therapy treatment platform for home use;
Ability for physical therapists to observe multiple patients simultaneously in real-time;
Solves what has been a structural problem and limitation in post-acute care practice growth.
PT practices can experience 20% higher adherence & compliance rates versus industry standards; and
Tracking to 30% increase in net income for a PT practice.

Patient program adherence in 2015 and 2016 was nearly 85 percent due the real-time patient monitoring and the at-home use of the platform. Now physical therapy practices have a way to scale profitably using a technology platform that can help them grow beyond the limits of the typical brick and mortar PT clinic.

Additional Treatment Protocols: Our current PHZIO platform includes a fully customizable treatment program for multiple physical therapy treatment plans including patient rehabilitations for total knee, hip and shoulder surgeries, lower and upper back ailments and other physical therapy treatments. We currently have a growing library of over 250 individual 2-4 minute exercise videos within our PHZIO platform, with additional exercise content generated as needed. The Company's initial PHZIO application is a 6-month exercise program for patients with back, knee or hip pain. Our hip and knee programs have been designed to be integrated into any hospital or medical group's Medicare CMS bundled payment model for post-acute care physical therapy. These programs are anticipated to be followed by woman's health and geriatric programs by the end of the third quarter of 2017.

Our initial PHZIO platform enables employees or patients to engage with live or on-demand video based physical therapy telemedicine treatments from their home or office. Following a physician's exam and prescription for physical therapy to treat back, knee or hip pain, a patient can be examined by a physical therapist and if found appropriate inducted in the Company's PHZIO program that includes a progressive 6-month telemedicine exercise program (including monthly in-clinic checkups). All PHZIO treatments are monitored by a licensed therapist that sees everything the patient is doing while providing their professional guidance and feedback in real-time. This ensures treatment compliance by the patient, maintains the safety and integrity of the prescribed exercises, tracks patient metrics and captures pre-and post-treatment evaluation data. PHZIO unlocks a host of potential for revolutionizing patient treatment models and directly links back to the established brick and mortar physical therapy clinic. This unique model enables any physical therapy practice to be able to execute more patient care while utilizing their same resources, and creates more value than was ever before possible.

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy ("EPT"), a company owned by our CEO, pursuant to which EPT operate our Platform and offers it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. The Company will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments. On May 7, 2015, EPT inducted the first patient using our platform. The total (insurance reimbursed) monitored PHZIO visits in 2015 and 2016 was 1928 total patient visits that include: 2015: 699 patient visits (239 insurance reimbursed patient visits generating approximately $13,500 in gross revenue) and in 2016: 1,229 patient visits generating $1,496 (approximately 26 insurance reimbursed visits). These gross revenue figures were not sufficient to generate any gross sales for the Company. The average insurance reimbursement per PHZIO session in 2015 and 2016 was $56 (excluding co-payments). Respectively. The top line wellness goals of our program are to graduate at least 80% of inducted patients through our 6-month program. Patients should expect to experience an average of a 20% reduction in BMI, a 4-inch reduction in waist size, weight loss of at least 20 pounds, significant overall improvement in balance, coordination, flexibility, strength, and lumbopelvic stability. Patients also should score better on Functional Outcomes Scales (Oswestry and LEFS), which indicates improved functional activity levels due to reduced low back, knee and hip pain.

Our PHZIO platform, including: design, testing, exercise intervention, follow-up, and exercise demonstration, has been developed by accomplished Los Angeles based physical therapist Darwin Fogt. Mr. Fogt has extensive experience and education working with diverse populations from professional athletes to morbidly obese. He understands the most beneficial exercise prescription to achieve optimal results and has had enormous success in motivating all patient types to stay consistent in working toward their goals. Additionally, his methods have proven effective and safe as he demonstrates exercises with attention to proper form to avoid injury. Mr. Fogt has established himself as a national leader in his field and has successfully implemented progressive solutions to delivering physical therapy: he has consulted with and been published by numerous national publications including Runner's World, Men's Health, Men's Journal, and various Physical Therapy specific magazines; his 13 plus years of experience include rehabilitating the general population, as well as professional athletes, Olympic gold medalists, and celebrities. He has bridged the gap between physical therapy and fitness by opening Evolution Fitness, which uses licensed physical therapists to teach high intensity circuit training fitness classes. He also founded one of the first exclusive prenatal and postnatal physical therapy clinic in the country. Mr. Fogt is a leader in advancing the profession to incorporate research-based methods and focus on, not only rehabilitation but also wellness, functional fitness, performance, and prevention. He can recognize that the national healthcare structure (federal and private insurance) is moving toward a model of prevention and that the physical therapy profession will take a larger role in providing wellness services to patients.

Innovators in other industries have solved access, cost and quality inefficiencies through the implementation of technology platforms and business models that deliver products and services on-demand and create new economies by connecting and empowering both consumers and businesses. We have taken the same approach to solving the pervasive access, cost and quality challenges facing the current access to physical therapy clinics.

Page 64


Our underlying technology platform is complex, deeply integrated and purpose-built over the three years for the evolving physical therapy marketplace. Our PHZIO platform is highly scalable and can support substantial growth of third party licensees. Our PHZIO platform provides for broad interconnectivity between PT practitioners and their patients and, we believe, uniquely positions us as a focal point in the rapidly evolving PT industry to introduce innovative, technology-based solutions, such as remote patient monitoring, post-discharge treatment plan adherence and in-home care.

We plan to generate revenue from third-party PT and corporate wellness licensees on a contractually recurring per PHZIO session fee basis. Our PHZIO platform is anticipated to transform the access, cost and quality dynamics of physical therapy delivery for all of the market participants. We further believe any patient, employer, health plan or healthcare professional interested in a better approach to physical therapy is a potential PHZIO platform user.

Selling General and Administrative Expenses (SGA). Before even launching, we have received a high indication of interest in our service. We think the demand is warranted, but recognize that in the preliminary stages of our services, we may experience bottlenecks in our ability to meet the demand for same. Under this type of environment, it is critical to maintain awareness of the Company's operational budget goals and how they are being met in our attempts to address demand. Regardless of our growth pace, it is critical to shareholder value that we are mindful of our operational spending.

Results of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015

We had no revenues from operations during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. We expect to generate revenues during the second quarter of 2017.

Our operating expenses increased to $3,371,460 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $1,400,240 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase is a result of legal, accounting services, and consulting fees ($2,048,355).

We had total operating expenses of $3,371,460 related to general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to total operating expenses of $1,400,240 related to general and administrative expenses during the year ended June 30, 2015.

The Company incurred a net loss of $12,460,694 for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared with a net loss of $1,554,908 for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $10,905,786. The significant increase was the result of increased legal, accounting services and consulting fees of $2,048,355, a loss of $10,318,969 of derivative expense from the issuance of derivative instruments and the amortization of $793,716 of debt discount on debt instruments issued.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2016, we had negative working capital of $10,018,688 compared to negative working capital of $1,430,459 as of December 31, 2015. The majority of the increase of negative working capital is because of the derivative liability. Cash flows provided by financing activities were $336,796 and $443,127 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The decrease in cash flows from financing activities was the reduction in promissory notes issued for cash. The cash balance as of December 31, 2016 was $13,995.

We believe that anticipated cash flows from operations will be insufficient to satisfy our ongoing capital requirements. For the year ended December 31, 2016, there was a negative cash flows from operations of $364,752 compared to a negative cash flows from operations of $397,869 for the year ended December 31, 2015. This is primarily due to the net loss for each of the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015. We are seeking financing in the form of equity capital to provide the necessary working capital. Our ability to meet our obligations and continue to operate as a going concern is highly dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing. We cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. We may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. In any of these events, we may be unable to implement our current plans which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial conditions and results of operations.

Contingencies

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 ("Rule 419") of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a "Blank Check" offering subject to Rule 419 (the "Rule 419 Offering") and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the "Trust Account Balance").

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties' efforts to satisfy all the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with respectmanagement of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A ("Form 8A") to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the "Converted Offering"), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

Page 65


Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company's restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the "Consent") rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), "funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the common stock offered hereby. As permittedpurchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the rules and regulationseffective date of the SEC, this prospectus, which is partrelated registration statement]." As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the registration statement, omits certain information, exhibits, schedules and undertakings set forthRule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the registration statement. CopiesConverted Offering. The consent document was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the registration statementproceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

As disclosed in the exhibits are on fileprior amendments to the Initial Form 8-K, we have filed the prior amendments in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to the Company's potential violation of Rule 419. Although the Company has continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, based upon latest communications with the persons reviewing the Form 8-K, they do not agree with the assessments the Company presented to them. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

Because of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. Because of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible now to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be obtained fromresolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the SEC’s Web siteoutcome of any potential lawsuit or upon paymentaction is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining now the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the fee prescribedamount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the SEC,assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. Considering the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company's Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

Capital Expenditure Plan During the Next Twelve Months

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we raised $336,796 in equity and debt capital and we may be examined, without charge,expected to require up to an additional $1.6 million in capital during the next 12 months to fully implement our business plan and fund our operations. Our plan is to utilize the equity capital that we raise, together with anticipated cash flow from operations, to fund a very significant investment in sales and marketing, concentration principally on advertising and incentivizing existing customers for the introduction of new customers, among other strategies. However, there can be no assurance that: (i) we will continue to be successful in raising equity capital in sufficient amounts and/or at terms and conditions satisfactory to the officesCompany; or (ii) we will generate sufficient revenues from operations, to fulfill our plan of operations. Our revenues are expected to come from our PHZIO platform services. As a result, we will continue to incur operating losses unless and until we are able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our operating expenses and fund our planned sales and market efforts. There can be no assurance that the market will adopt our portal or that we will generate sufficient cash flow to fund our enhanced sales and marketing plan. In the event that we are not able to successfully: (i) raise equity capital and/or debt financing; or (ii) market and significantly increase the number of portal users and revenues from such users, our financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected and we will either have to delay or curtail our plan for funding our sales and marketing efforts."

Going Concern Consideration

Our registered independent auditors have issued an opinion on our financial statements which includes a statement describing our going concern status. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills and meet our other financial obligations. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin marketing the product. Accordingly, we must raise capital from sources other than the actual sale of the SEC set forth above. For further information, reference is madeproduct. We must raise capital to the registration statementimplement our project and its exhibits. Information located on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into this filing unless this filing specifically indicates otherwise.stay in business.

Page 66


MANAGEMENTOff-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934.

DirectorsContractual Obligations and Executive OfficersCommitments

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we did not have any contractual obligations.

The following table and text set forth the names and agesCritical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 of all directors and executive officers as of August 21 , 2015.our Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There arehave been no family relationships among ourchanges in or disagreements with accountants on accounting or financial disclosure matters.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

Our directors and executive officers. Each director iswere elected at our annual meeting of shareholders and holds officeto serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders orand until his successor isrespective successors will have been elected and will have qualified. Also provided herein are brief descriptions ofThe following table sets forth the business experience of each director,name, age and position held with respect to our present executive officerofficers and advisor during the past five years and an indication of directorships held by each director in other companies subject to the reporting requirements under the Federal securities laws. None of our officers or directors is a party adverse to us or has a material interest adverse to us.directors:

NameAge AgePosition(s)Position 
Darwin Fogt4240CEO, President Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of DirectorsDirector
David Markowski5456Chief Financial Officer and Member of the Board of DirectorsDirector
Curtis Hollister43Chief Technology Officer and Director
Douglas MacLellan5961Chairman and Secretary
Curtis Hollister41Chief Technology Officer and Member of the Board of Directors
Douglas Cole6058Member of the Board of DirectorsDirector
Brandon Rowberry4340Member of the Board of DirectorsDirector
Rochelle Pleskow5650

Member of the Board of DirectorsDirector

Darwin Fogt, President, CEO & DirectorDirector..Mr. Fogt has been CEO of eWellness Corporation since May 2013. Since 2001, he has been founder, President and practicing therapist of Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc,Inc., a privately held company in Los Angeles, CA providing sports and orthopedic physical therapy services. From 2008 to present, Mr. Fogt has also been founder and President of Bebe PT, a physical therapy practice specializing in perinatal rehabilitation and wellness. Additionally, from 2012 to present Mr. Fogt has been founder and President of Evolution Fitness, a primarily cash-based fitness and rehabilitation center serving high level athletes and clients in Culver City, CA. Mr. Fogt has consulted with and been published by numerous national publications including Runner’sRunner's World, Men’sMen's Health, Men’sMen's Journal, and various Physical Therapy specific magazines; his 13 plus years of experience include rehabilitating the general population, as well as professional athletes, Olympic gold medalists, and celebrities. Mr. Fogt earned his B.S. in Exercise Science from the University of Southern California in 1996 and his MPT (Master’s(Master's of Physical Therapy) from California State University: Long Beach in 2001. He is currently working toward earning his DPT (Doctorate of Physical Therapy) degree.

David Markowski, Chief Financial Officer & Director.Mr. Markowski has been CFO of eWellness Corporation since May 2013. From October 1997 to October 2002 he was CEO and Co-Founder of GFNN, Inc. From 2002 to 2013 Mr. Markowski has maintained various active roles within GFNN’sGFNN's subsidiaries including Founder, Director and CEO positions. From October 2009 to December 2011, he was the Director of Corporate Development for Visualant, Inc. From June 2003 to 2010 he was President of Angel Systems, Inc. an independent consulting firm with competencies in strategic marketing and business development. From January 1998 to October 1998, Mr. Markowski served as the Vice President of Finance for Medcom USA, a NASDAQ listed company. Prior to that, he had a decade of investment banking experience on Wall Street involved in financing start-ups and public offerings. He is a business development specialist with accolades in INC Magazine and others. Mr. Markowski obtained a BA degree in Marketing from Florida State University in 1982.

Curtis Hollister, Chief Technology Officer & Director.Mr. Hollister has been a founder and CTO of eWellness since May 2013. From November 2008 to present he has been the founder and President of Social Pixels, a privately held Canadian company focused on helping companies apply online media and digital campaigning. From November 2008 to present he has been the founder and President of Ripplefire, a privately held Canadian company also specializing in the digital campaigning space. He is a global entrepreneur and innovator known for his ability to identify and capitalize on industry trends. His high profile projects include such clients as Government of Canada, AT&T, Bell Canada, Microsoft, Nokia, Conversant IP and TD Bank. From 1998 to 2002 Mr. Hollister founded and operated TeamCast.com, a technology spin-off focusing on peer-to-peer networking. From 1997 to 2002 Mr. Hollister founded and operated Intrasoft Technologies, a technology start-up to capitalize on the emerging Intranet application market. From 1995 to 1997 Mr. Hollister founded and operated Intranet Technologies, the first successful Internet service provider in Ottawa, Canada’sCanada's capital city. Mr. Hollister graduated from Center Hastings Secondary in 1991 and from 1991 to 1995 attended Carleton University with a special focus on Economics.

Page 67


DouglasDouglas MacLellan, Chairman of the BoardBoard.. Mr. MacLellan currently serves as Chairman of the Board of eWellness Corporation since May 2013. From November 2009 to present Mr. MacLellan has been an independent director of ChinaNet Online Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNET) a media development, advertising and communications company. From June 2011 to present Mr. MacLellan has been Chairman of Innovare Products, Inc., a privately held company that develops innovative consumer products. In May 2014, Mr. MacLellan join the Board as an independent director of Star MountainJameson Stanford Resources Inc.Corporation (OTCBB: SMRS)JMSN) an early stage mining company. Until April 2014, Mr. MacLellan was Chairman and chief executive officer at Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (OTCQB: RXPC.PK), a vertically integrated specialty pharmaceutical company. He also continues to serve as president and chief executive officer for the MacLellan Group, an international financial advisory firm since 1992. From August 2005 to May 2009, Mr. MacLellan was co-founder and vice chairman at Ocean Smart, Inc., a Canadian based aquaculture company. From February 2002 to September 2006, Mr. MacLellan served as chairman and cofounder at Broadband Access MarketSpace, Ltd., a China based IT advisory firm, and was also co-founder at Datalex Corp., a software and IT company specializing in mainframe applications, from February 1997 to May 2002. Mr. MacLellan was educated at the University of Southern California in economics and international relations.

Douglas Cole, Director.Mr. Cole has been a Director of the company since May 2014. From 2005 to the present Mr. Cole has been a Partner overseeing all ongoing deal activities with Objective Equity LLC, a boutique investment bank focused on the technology, healthcare andclean tech, mining and mineral sectors. From 2002 to 2005 Mr. Cole has played various executive roles as Executive Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of TWL Corporation (TWLP.OB). From May 2000 to September 2005, he was also the Director of Lair of the Bear, The University of California Family Camp located in Pinecrest, California. During the period between 1991 and 19961998 he was the CEO of HealthSoft and he also founded and operated Great Bear Technology,(GBT) which acquired Sony Image Soft and Starpress, then went public and eventually sold to Graphix Zone. In 1995 Mr. Cole was honored by NEA, a leading venture capital firm, as CEO of the year for his work in the Starpress integration. From 1996-199 He wasSince 1982 he has been very active with the CEO and Board memberUniversity of NetAmerica.com (NAMI) 1996-1999. He has also served on various public boards including Longwei Petroleum ( LPH)  2011-Feb 2013, Advanced Therapeutics (AVTH) Dec 2013- January 2104 and China Chemical. (CHCC), 2011-2012.California, Berkeley mentoring early-stage technology companies. Mr. Cole obtained his BA in Social Sciences from UC Berkeley in 1978.

Brandon Rowberry, Director. Mr Rowberry has been a Director since June 2014. He is a well-known healthcare innovation executive. From 2010 to 2014 he drove enterprise-wide Innovation/Venturing for United Health Group where in 2012 they were awarded the prestigious PDMA Outstanding Corporate Innovation Award. From 2012 to present he has also been Managing Director of 7R Ventures an investment and advisory firm. From 2005 to 2009, he was Director of Strategy & Innovation at Circuit City. From 2001 to 2005, he was a Sr. Corporate Consultant focusing on Organizational Development and Innovation at Hallmark. From 2000 to 2001, he was a Manager of Organizational Development & Innovation at Honeywell. Mr. Rowberry has also been a frequent corporate innovation guest speaker on NBC, FOX, ABC. Mr. Rowberry obtained his Masters of Organizational Behavior from Marriott School of Business, BYU in 2000.

Rochelle Pleskow, DirectorDirector.. From 2010 through 2014, she hasMs. Pleskow served as the Chief Healthcare Information Officer for Hewlett Packard. She developed the framework of healthcare analytics platform, which encompasses quality improvement, outcomes analysis, patient safety, operational analytics, clinical informatics, physician performance, and regulatory compliance monitoring for health plans, hospitals and physicians. From 2008 through 2010, she acted as a senior consultant to various companies on healthcare policy and procedures including acting as an advisor for ASP model start-up, whose business included a HIPAA/HL7 and PCI compliant processing tool, which verifies a patient’spatient's insurance coverage, accurately calculates out-of-pocket costs, and processes payments in one system and at the time of service. This model improves revenue cycle management as it accelerates the collection of patient payments. From 2007 through 2008, she was Director of business Architecture for Blue Shield of California, where she developed the business framework and core elements of a large scale IT systems implementation to increase competitive advantage for Blue Shield of California. Re-engineered core business processes in Health Services Division in order to modernize the technology. Ms. Pleskow received her B.A. and M.S. from the State University of New York at Buffalo.

Director Qualifications

We seek directors with established strong professional reputations and experience in areas relevant to the strategy and operations of our businesses. We also seek directors who possess the qualities of integrity and candor, who have strong analytical skills and who are willing to engage management and each other in a constructive and collaborative fashion, in addition to the ability and commitment to devote time and energy to service on the Board and its committees, as necessary. We believe that all of our directors meet the foregoing qualifications.

The Board believes that the leadership skills and other experience of the Board members described below, in addition to each person’sperson's experience set forth above in their respective biographies, provide the Company with a range of perspectives and judgment necessary to guide our strategies and monitor our executives business execution.

Darwin Fogt. Mr. Fogt is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving as a physical therapist for over 12 years and has built three successful physical therapy practices. Mr. Fogt has contributed to the Board’sBoard's strong leadership and vision for the development of the Company’sCompany's innovative business model.

Douglas MacLellan. Mr. MacLellan is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving as an officer and/or director of various advance technology and high growth companies over the past 20 years. Mr. MacLellan has contributed to the Board’s strong leadership and vision for the development of the Company’s innovative business model.

Curtis Hollister. Mr. Hollister is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving in senior management positions in various advance technology, software and video content business over the past 20 years. He holds a wealth of experience in software development, video content management and network technology.

David Markowski. Mr. Markowski is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving in senior management positions in various companies over the past 20 years, with an emphasis on corporate finance, accounting, audit, financial modeling and marketing. He holds a wealth of experience in company management skills.

Curtis Hollister. Mr. Hollister is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving in senior management positions in various advance technology, software and video content business over the past 20 years. He holds a wealth of experience in software development, video content management and network technology.

Page 68


Douglas MacLellan. Mr. MacLellan is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving as an officer and/or director of various advance technology and high growth companies over the past 20 years. Mr. MacLellan has contributed to the Board's strong leadership and vision for the development of the Company's innovative business model.

Doug Cole. Mr. Cole is an international business executive with over 20 years of active management and board roles in various software, educational and technology public and private companies.

Brandon Rowberry. Mr. Rowberry holdshas held over 15 years in senior management positions as an innovation expert in various advance technology and healthcare industries. He is anticipated to greatly expand our industry relationships within healthcare insurers and the telemedicine industry.

Rochelle Pleskow. Ms. Pleskow holds a vast knowledge base on healthcare informatics and the scaling of various technology implementations at selected large scale technology and healthcare companies and is anticipated to be a good addition to its board of directors as the Company implements its anticipated white label program to physical therapy clinics through the U.S. marketplace.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the bestNone of the Company’s knowledge, none of the following events occurred duringour directors, officers or affiliates has, within the past tenfive years, that are material to an evaluation offiled any bankruptcy petition, been convicted in or been the ability or integritysubject of any of our executive officers, directorspending criminal proceedings, or promoters:

(1) A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws oris any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing,subject or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

(2) Convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

(3) Subject of any order, judgment or decree not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated,involving the violation of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanentlystate or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

(i) Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer infederal securities or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

(ii) Engaging in any type of business practice; or

(iii) Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

(4) Subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (3)(i) above, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

(5) Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

(6) Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

(7) Subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

(i) Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

(ii) Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

(iii) Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

(8) Subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization, any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.laws.

Promoters and Certain Control Persons

In light of the efforts and services they provided to the Private Co. prior to the Share Exchange, we believe that Douglas MacLellan and Darwin Fogt may be deemed “promoters” (within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act), since they took the initiative in the formation of our business and received 10% of our equity securities in exchange for the contribution of property or services, during the last five years. In addition, Gregg C. E. Johnson may be deemed a “promoter” of the Company as a result of his receipt of shares of our common stock at the time of completion of the Share Exchange.

Executive Compensation

For the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we did not pay any compensation to our executive officers, nor did any other person receive a total annual salary and bonus exceeding $100,000. Prior to the Share Exchange, which closed in April 2014, we did not pay our sole officer any compensation nor did we have an employment agreement.

Following the Share Exchange, we do not currently have any formal employment salary arrangement with any of or new officers. However, the Board determined that the following salaries shall be recordedand accrued on a monthly basis as contributed capital and compensation for the following individuals for the services they provide to us:

After 1-1-14,but before profitability

Monthly Recognized  Contributed  Compensated 
Douglas MacLellan, Chairman $20,000  $11,000  $9,000 
Darwin Fogt, CEO/President $14,000  $7,000  $7,000 
David Markowski, CFO $14,000  $7,000  $7,000 
Curtis Hollister, CTO $14,000  $7,000  $7,000 

At profitability and after

Monthly Recognized  Contributed  Compensated 
Douglas MacLellan, Chairman $20,000  $0  $20,000 
Darwin Fogt, CEO/President $14,000  $0  $14,000 
David Markowski, CFO $14,000  $0  $14,000 
Curtis Hollister, CTO $14,000  $0  $14,000 

All of our current officers have agreed to defer their compensation until such time as we are cash flow positive; therefore, none of our officers have received any compensation as of the date of this Registration Statement. No retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by the Company for the benefit of the Company’s employees.

Director’s Compensation

We shall continue to maintain the policy regarding director compensation that existed prior to the Share Exchange, pursuant to which directors are not entitled to receive compensation for service rendered to us or for meeting(s) attended except for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. There are no formal or informal arrangements or agreements to compensate employee directors for service provided as a director; however, compensation for new non-employee directors is determined on an ad hoc basis by the existing members of the board of directors at the time a director is elected.

Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to the Company’s Risk Management

We believe that our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers, do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Employment Contracts

We do not have any formal employment agreement with any of our current Officers. Any future compensation will be determined by the Board of Directors, and, as appropriate, an employment agreement will be executed. We do not currently have plans to pay any compensation until such time as the Company maintains a positive cash flow.

Outstanding Equity Awards

There were no equity awards outstanding as of the end of the six month period ending June 30, 2015 or the year ended December 31, 2014.

On July 31, 2015, our Board of Directors approved the 2015 Stock Option Plan. The following is a brief description of certain important features of the 2015 Plan, the full text of which is attached as Exhibit 10.7. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Exhibit 10.7.

General. The 2015 Plan provides for any option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance award, dividend equivalent, or other stock-based award to employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company and its affiliates.

Administration. The 2015 Plan shall be administered and interpreted by the Board of Directors or by a Committee appointed by the Board of Directors. If the Board of Directors administers the 2015 Plan, references to the “Committee” shall be deemed to refer to the Board of Directors. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may at any time delegate to one or more officers or directors of the Company some or all of its authority over the administration of the 2015 plan. Such delegation may be revoked at any time.

The Committee has the authority to administer and interpret the 2010 Plan, to determine the employees to whom awards will be made under the 2015 Plan and, subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, the type and size of each award, the terms and conditions for vesting, cancellation and forfeiture of awards and the other features applicable to each award or type of award. The Committee may accelerate or defer the vesting or payment of awards, cancel or modify outstanding awards, waive any conditions or restrictions imposed with respect to awards of the stock issued pursuant to awards and make any and all other determinations that it deems appropriate with respect to the administration of the 2015 Plan, subject to the minimum vesting requirements of the 2015 Plan, the provisions of Sections 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and any applicable laws or exchange rules.

Eligibility. All employees, officers, directors and consultants are eligible to receive awards under the 2015 Plan. The definition of “employee” means any person including officers and directors of the Company or a parent or subsidiary of the Company. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company will be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company. Participation is discretionary — awards are subject to approval by the Committee. Pursuant to the 2015 Plan, the Company is permitted to grant nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted stock units and other stock based awards to the employees, directors and consultants. Incentive stock options are not issuable under the 2015 Plan.

Shares Subject to the Plan. The number of Shares available for granting awards under the 2015 Plan shall be (A) 3,000,000, plus (B) additional Shares as follows: As of January 1 of each year, commencing with the January 2, 2016, the aggregate number of Shares available for granting Awards under the Plan shall automatically increase by a number of Shares equal to the lesser of (x) 2% of the total number of Shares then outstandingand (y) such lower number of Shares as may be determined by the Committee, subject to certain adjustment. Shares of Company common stock issued in connection with awards under the 2015 Plan may be shares that are authorized but unissued, or previously issued shares that have been reacquired, or both.

Types of Awards. The following types of awards may be made under the 2015 Plan. All of the awards described below are subject to the conditions, limitations, restrictions, vesting and forfeiture provisions determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, subject to such limitations as are provided in the plan. The number of shares subject to any award is also determined by the Committee, in its discretion.

Fair Market Value. Fair Market Value means shall mean, with respect to any property (including, without limitation, any shares or other securities), the fair market value of such property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by the Board or the Committee.

Option. Option shall mean a non-qualified stock option.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A Stock Appreciation Right granted under the Plan shall confer on the holder thereof a right to receive, upon exercise thereof, the excess of (1) the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of exercise or, if the Board or the Committee shall so determine in the case of any such right other than one related to any Incentive Stock Option, at any time during a specified period before or after the date of exercise over (2) the grant price of the right as specified by the Board or the Committee. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the grant price, term, methods of exercise, methods of settlement, and any other terms and conditions of any Stock Appreciation Right shall be as determined by the Board or the Committee. The Board and the Committee may impose such conditions or restrictions on the exercise of any Stock Appreciation Right as it may deem appropriate.

Restricted Stock. A restricted stock award is an award of outstanding shares of Company common stock that does not vest until after a specified period of time, or satisfaction of other vesting conditions as determined by the Committee, and which may be forfeited if conditions to vesting are not met. Participants generally receive dividend payments on the shares subject to their award during the vesting period (unless the awards are subject to performance-vesting criteria) and are also generally entitled to indicate a voting preference with respect to the shares underlying their awards. All shares underlying outstanding restricted stock awards are voted proportionately to the restricted shares for which voting instructions are received.

Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units shall consist of a Restricted Stock, Performance Share or Performance Unit Award that the Administrator in its sole discretion permits to be paid out in installments or on a deferred basis, in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Administrator.

Performance Awards. Performance Awards may be granted to Employees, directors and consultants at any time and from time to time, as will be determined by the Administrator. The Administrator may set performance objectives based upon the achievement of Company-wide, divisional or individual goals, applicable federal or state laws, or any other basis determined by the Administrator in its discretion.

Dividend Equivalents. The Board and the Committee are hereby authorized to grant Awards under which the holders thereof shall be entitled to receive payments equivalent to dividends or interest with respect to a number of Shares determined by the Board or the Committee, and the Board and the Committee may provide that such amounts (if any) shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares or otherwise reinvested. Subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, such Awards may have such terms and conditions as the Board or the Committee shall determine.

Other Stock-based Awards. The Board and the Committee are authorized to grant such other Awards that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, Shares (including, without limitation, securities convertible into Shares), as are deemed by the Board or the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan, provided, however, that such grants must comply with applicable law. Subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, the Board or the Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of such Awards.

Duration. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan, including, without limitation, any amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation, or termination that would impair the rights of any Participant, or any other holder or beneficiary of any Award theretofore granted, without the consent of any share owner, participant of the 2015 Plan, other holder or beneficiary of an Award, or other Person. No Award shall be granted under the Plan more than 10 years after August 1, 2015. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in an applicable Award Agreement, any Award theretofore granted may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the Board and the Committee to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any such Award, or to waive any conditions or rights under any such Award, and the authority of the Board to amend the Plan, shall extend beyond such date.

As of August 21, 2015, we have agreed to issue 350,000 options under the 2015 Plan.

40

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of August 21 , 2015 by (i) each person (or group of affiliated persons) who is known by us to own more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) each director, executive officer and director nominee, and (iii) all of our directors, executive officers and director nominees as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of the respective table. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares that such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of the respective table is deemed to be outstanding for such person, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The inclusion herein of any shares listed as beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership.

The business address of each beneficial owner listed is in care of 11825 Major Street, Culver City, California, 90230 unless otherwise noted. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock owned by them, except to the extent that power may be shared with a spouse.

As of August 21 , 2015, we had 17,131,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, our former sole director and CEO, Mr. McRobbie-Johnson, agreed to cancel 5,000,000 shares of common stock that he owned and to transfer an aggregate of 4,600,000 shares of our common stock that he owned. Accordingly, after the Share Exchange, Mr. McRobbie-Johnson owns 400,000 of common stock shares, or approximately 2.6%, of our issued and outstanding common stock.

Pursuant to our Supply and Distribution Agreement with Millennium Healthcare, Inc., we shall issue them 110,000 shares of our common stock, up to a maximum amount of 1.1 million shares, for every $100,000.00 of insurance reimbursement received by us from MHI patients for our DMpt program (up to $1 million in billing). As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have not issued MHI any shares and such shares shall not be included in the number of our outstanding shares of common stock until they are issued, if ever; however, if all 1.1million shares were issued today, MHI would own approximately 7.2% of our outstanding common stock.

Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and
Nature of
BeneficialOwnership
  Percent of Class 
Darwin Fogt  3,750,000(1)  

21.9

%
David Markowski  1,100,000   

6.4

%
Douglas MacLellan  3,750,000   

21.9

%
Curtis Hollister  1,950,000   

11.4

%
Douglas Cole  200,000   1.2%
Brandon Rowberry  200,000   1.2%
Rochelle Pleskow  

250,000

(2)  

1.5

%
All officers and directors as a group (7 persons)  11,200,000   

65.4

%
J.F.S. Investments, Inc. (3)  950,000   

5.5

%
Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc. (4)  1,000,000(1)  

5.8

%
Gregg C.E. Johnson (5)  1,545,669(6)  

9.0

%

(1)This includes 1,000,000 shares held by Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc., which is owned by Mr. Fogt.
(2)This includes 250,000 5-year stock options at a price of $0.80 per share.
(3)Joseph Salvani is the President andthe sole indirect owner of, and controls,J.F.S. Investments, Inc.
(4)Darwin Fogt is the President andthe sole indirect owner of, and controls,Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc.
(5)The mailing address for Gregg C.E. Johnson is 6081 W. Park Ave, Chandler, AZ 85226.
(6)This amount includes: (i) 1,240,669 shares held by Summit Capital USA, Inc. (“Summit USA”), which is beneficially owned by Mr. Johnson, who has voting and dispositive control over the securities held by Summit USA and (ii) 305,000 shares Mr. Johnson owns directly. Mr. Johnson disclaims beneficial ownership of the common stock owned by Summit USA, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in such company.

Changes in Control

As a result of the Share Exchange, eWellness became our wholly owned subsidiary and the officers and directors appointed as of the closing of such transaction own approximately 66.7% of the shares of the Company outstanding post-exchange common stock. As a result, the newly appointed board members control the board.

Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters And Certain Control Persons

Other than the relationships and transactions discussed below, we are not a party to, nor are we proposed to be a party, to any transaction during the last fiscal year involving an amount exceeding $120,000 and in which a related person, as such term is defined by Item 404 of Regulation S-K, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Related Party Debt: Prior to the closing of the Share Exchange through the year ended December 31, 2014, a related party, a company in which our former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO also served as CFO, paid $67,710 on behalf of the Company. The amount outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $56,155 and $40,893, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded $3,867 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party. At the period ended June 30 , 2015, the amount outstanding was $45,336 and the Company recorded $1,976 of imputed interest on that outstanding amount. The debt remains a Company liability, which is to be repaid when the Company has sufficient capital to do so and there is no specific time frame within which such repayment must be made.

Share Transfers: Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, Mr. McRobbie (our former CEO and sole director) transferred an aggregate of 2,100,000 shares to the following parties: 1,500,000 to Summit Capital USA, Inc. (“Summit”), over which our former CFO serves as CFO; 300,000 to an unrelated third party; and, 300,000 to Gregg Johnson, who, together with his wife beneficially owns Summit Capital Corp., which is a 50% owner of Summit; all of these shares were issued as compensation for a variety of business consulting services each such named party performed on behalf of the Company pursuant to oral agreements between each party and Mr. McRobbie. The services provided included identifying, evaluating, structuring and providing advice in connection with potential acquisitions, mergers or combinations with potential acquisitions, performance of due diligence, coordination of accounting and legal due diligence, familiarization with the business, operations, properties, financial condition, management and prospects of potential target companies and the coordination of the preparation of all required documentation to complete the acquisition and the filing of all required public disclosures to complete such transaction. These services also included the evaluation of several different business opportunities, including the transaction with eWellness Corporation that was ultimately consummated. Based on the oral agreements with Mr. McRobbie, the fee for these services was earned and due upon the closing of the Share Exchange. The transfer of the 2,100,000 shares was a private transaction between the named individuals and was not a Company issuance.

MHI Agreement: On May 24, 2013, eWellness entered into an exclusive 25-year Supply and Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Millennium Healthcare, Inc. (“MHI”) for the following 14 states that include: Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. Under the agreement, eWellness agrees to provide its eWellness Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”) to MHI affiliated physicians within the terms of the Agreement. MHI agreed to market the eWellness DMpt and agreed to use its best efforts to promote and use the DMpt program; MHI also agreed to assist in managing the insurance reimbursement to eWellness for PT evaluations, re-evaluations and physical tests that eWellness staff perform at selected MHI facilities; however, we will be responsible for seeking reimbursement opportunities from insurance providers who do not currently reimburse for our telemedicine services. MHI, through its wholly owned operating subsidiaries, provide primary care physician practices, physician groups and healthcare facilities of all sizes with cutting edge medical devices focused primarily on preventive care through early detection. MHI currently provides their services to 70 medical group offices in NYC and approximately 130 in Northern New Jersey. There are approximately 400 individual physicians in these various practices. Approximately 20 percent of those patient visits are reoccurring visits.

MHI will charge eWellness a 20% billing fee on all insurance reimbursement or patient fees for marketing the DMpt Program and assisting in the processing of insurance reimbursement. We have also agreed that for every $100,000.00 of insurance reimbursement received from MHI patients for our DMpt program (up to $1 million in billing), we will issue 110,000 shares of our common stock to MHI, up to a maximum amount of 1.1 million shares. As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have not issued any shares to MHI under this Agreement because we have not yet required or utilized MHI’s reimbursement services, nor has MHI marketed our services.

Each party has the right to terminate the agreement upon breach of the Agreement or dissolution of either party. We may also terminate the Agreement if MHI is, for a period of 60 continuous days, restrained or prevented from transacting a substantial part of their business by reason of a judgment order or regulation of any court or authority; MHI may terminate the Agreement at any time with 30 days written notice. The parties may also terminate the Agreement if either becomes the subject to any bankruptcy or similar proceeding. The Agreement also includes standard indemnification provisions for both parties.

Programming Agreement: On or about June 23, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Bistromatics Corp., to which one of our directors, Curtis Hollister, is Chief Marketing Officer, pursuant to which we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000; $2,000 of which was due upon execution, $5,000 of which is due on August 1, 2014 and the $13,000 balance is due by September 15, 2014. The parties entered into an addendum extending the due date of the $20,000 license fee to December 31, 2014 and another addendum extending it to July 1, 2015. Intellectual property developed as a result of this license, will be our property; but Bistromatics will retain the intellectual property for the original code base. We may resell or license the resulting telemedicine platform for an extended license fee of $10,000 for each additional instance the code base will be used. Through this agreement, Bistromatics Corp. built our PHZIO.com platform; Mr. Hollister purchased the domain name on behalf of the Company and retains no rights to same.

Operating Agreement: On April 1, 2015, we entered into an Operating Agreement with EPT (a company owned by our CEO), wherein we agreed that EPT would be able to operate our telemedicine platform www.phzio.com and offer it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. We shall receive 75% of the net insurance reimbursements from the patient for use of the platform. We will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments – computer equipment, office or facilities rental payments, physical therapist or physical therapy assistant, administrative staff, patient induction equipment, office supplies, utilities and other associated operating costs. It is anticipated that the operation of the platform by EPT will generate positive cash flow within 90 days from the start of patient induction.

Office Space: The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from Evolution Physical Therapy (“Evolution”), a company owned by our CEO. Evolution has agreed to contribute the annual rent for the period ended June 30 , 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 towards founding eWellness and its operations; the market value of such rent is $500 per month. During the period and year ended, the Company recorded rent expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

Research and Development: The officers of the Company from time to time charge the Company for research and development services. During the six months ended June 30 , 2015 and June 30 , 2014 the expenses for these services were $0 and $30, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the expenses for these services were $30 and $2,706, respectively.

Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Party Transactions

Our Board of Directors conducts an appropriate review of and oversees all related-party transactions. We have not yet adopted formal standards in respect of the review and approval or ratification of related-party transactions; however, our board has conformed to the following standards: (i) all related-party transactions must be fair and reasonable to us and on terms comparable to those reasonably expected to be agreed to with independent third parties for the same goods and/or services at the time authorized by the board; and (ii) all related-party transactions must be authorized, approved or ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors who have no interest, either directly or indirectly, in any such related party transaction.

Corporate Governance and Director Independence

Presently, we are not currently listed on a national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system and therefore are not required to comply with the director independence requirements of any securities exchange. In determining whether our directors are independent, however, we intend to comply with the rules of NASDAQ. The board of directors will also consult with counsel to ensure that the boards of director’sdirector's determinations are consistent with those rules and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the independence of directors, including those adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 with respect to the independence of audit committee members. Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2)defines an “independent director”"independent director" generally as a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’sCompany's board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Our Board of Directors has determined that Douglas Cole, BrandonMr. Rowberry and RochelleMs. Pleskow would qualify as “independent”"independent" as that term is defined by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). Further, Mr. Cole qualifies as “independent”"independent" under Nasdaq Listing Rules applicable to board committees.

Due to our lack of operations and size prior to the Share Exchange, we did not have an Audit Committee. For these same reasons, we did not have any other separate committees prior to the Share Exchange; all functions of a nominating committee, audit committee and compensation committee were performed by our sole director. Although, as stated above, we are not the subject of any listing requirements, in connection with the Share Exchange, our Board of Directors established several committees to assist it in carrying out its duties. In particular, committees shall work on key issues in greater detail than would be practical at a meeting of all the members of the Board of Directors; each committee reviews the results of its deliberations with the full Board of Directors

Directors.

The standing committees of the Board of Directors currently consist of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Current copies of the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, may be found on our website atwww.ewellnesshealth.com, under the heading “Corporate Information—"Corporate Information - Governance Documents." Printed versions also are available to any stockholder who requests them by writing to our corporate Secretary at our corporate address. Our Board of Directors may, from time to time, establish certain other committees to facilitate our management.

The Board will consider appointing members to each of the Committees at such time as a sufficient number of independent directors are appointed to the Board or as otherwise determined by the Board. Until such time, the full board of directors will undertake the duties of the audit committee, compensation committee and nominating committee.

A copy of our Code of Ethics is attached as Exhibit 14.1 which is incorporated herein by reference.

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

Other than as described below, none of the Selling Stockholders nor any of their affiliates has held any position or officeCompliance with been employed by or otherwise has had any material relationship with us or our affiliates during the three years prior to the date of this prospectus. Unless otherwise indicated below, none of the Selling Stockholders are broker-dealers or affiliates of a broker-dealer within the meaning of Section 3 of the Securities Exchange Act.

This prospectus relates to the offering and sale, from time to time, of up to 1,300,281 shares of our common stock held by the stockholders named in the table below.

The table below lists the selling stockholders and other information regarding the beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d)16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, as amended, requires that our directors, executive officers and the rules and regulations thereunder)persons who own more than 10% of a class of our common stockequity securities that are registered under the Exchange Act to file with respectthe SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership of such registered securities.

Based solely upon a review of information furnished to the securities heldCompany, to the Company's knowledge, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, none of our officers and directors have filed their reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership.

Page 69


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Any compensation received by eachour officers, directors, and management personnel will be determined from time to time by our Board of Directors. Our officers, directors, and management personnel will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred on our behalf.

For the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we did not pay any compensation to our executive officers, nor did any other person receive a total annual salary and bonus exceeding $100,000.

Following the Share Exchange, we do not currently have any formal employment salary arrangement with any of or new officers. All of our current officers have agreed to defer their compensation until such time as we are cash flow positive; therefore, none of our officers have received any compensation as of the selling stockholders. The second column listsdate of this Annual Report. No retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by the numberCompany for the benefit of the Company's employees.

Director's Compensation

Our directors are not entitled to receive compensation for service rendered to us or for meeting(s) attended except for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. There is no formal or informal arrangements or agreements to compensate employee directors for service provided as a director; however, compensation for new non-employee directors is determined on an ad hoc basis by the existing members of the board of directors at the time a director is elected.

Upon the appointment of Ms. Pleskow (a non-employee director) in August 2015, we agreed to pay her $2,000 per month, which shall accrue as of July 1, 2015 subject to the closing of our next financing. She shall also be eligible to receive any other benefits that are offered to other directors.

Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to the Company's Risk Management

We believe that our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers, do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Employment Contracts

We do not have any formal employment agreement with any of our officers. Any future compensation will be determined by the Board of Directors, and, as appropriate, an employment agreement will be executed. We do not currently have plans to pay any compensation until such time as the Company maintains a positive cash flow.

Outstanding Equity Awards

There were no equity awards outstanding as of the end the year ended December 31, 2016.

Option Grants

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 20,250,000 of stock options to executive officers and directors to purchase shares of common stock beneficially ownedat an average exercise price of $.27 per share.

Aggregated Option Exercises and Fiscal Year-End Option Value

There were no stock options exercised during the year ending December 31, 2016 and 2015 by each ofour executive officers.

Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") Awards

There were no awards made to a named executive officers in the selling stockholders as of August 21 , 2015, including assuming exercise of the Notes and Warrants held by each such selling stockholder on that date but taking account oflast completed fiscal year under any limitations on exercise set forth therein.LTIP.

Page 70


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The third columnfollowing table lists the shares of common stock underlying the Notes and Warrants being offered by this prospectus by the selling stockholders and does not take into account any limitations on conversion or exercise of the Notes or Warrants, respectively set forth therein.

The fourth column assumes the sale of all of the shares offered by the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus.

Under the terms of the Warrants, a selling stockholder may not exercise the warrants to the extent (but only to the extent) such selling stockholder or any of its affiliates would beneficially own a number of shares of our common stock which would exceed 4.99%. The number of shares in the second column reflects these limitations and other limitations on conversion and exercise of other convertible and exercisable instruments of the company held by each selling stockholder. The selling stockholders may sell all, some or none of their shares in this offering. See “Plan of Distribution.”

We estimate that our costs and expenses of registering the shares listed herein for resale will be approximately $4,901.82.

Name of Selling Stockholder Number of Shares of Common Stock Owned Prior to Offering  Maximum Number of Shares of Common Stock to be Sold Pursuant to this Prospectus  Number of Shares of Common Stock Owned After Offering 
Rodney Ryan Schoemann Jr. Inter Vivos Trust of 1998*  818,098(1)+   

210,858(2)

  

607,240

 
Rodney R. Schoemann  

1,250,000 (3)

  

265,100 (4)

   

984,900

 
Thomas Madden*  186,686+ +   77,329   109,357 
Mikhael Rogol*  17,143++   7,101   10,042 
Marquis Healthcare*  397,143++   164,505   232,638 
Donald Ulferts*  142,857++   59,174   83,683 
Len Chanasyk*  200,000++   82,844   117,156 
Christopher Bailey*  14,286++   5,918   8,368 
Victoria Lundell*  11,429++   4,734   6,695 
Theodore Aspergren*  142,857++   59,174   83,683 
Ed Umlauf*  300,000++   124,266   175,734 
Parallax Group*  23,429++   9,705   13,724 
Kristina Schoemann*  908,458(5)+   

229,573(6)

  

678,885

 

Except as otherwise indicated above or in the footnotes to the table, the selling stockholders have not held any position or office or had any material relationship with us or any of our subsidiaries within the past three years and possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.

* This person received shares from the Private Placement and the number of shares of Common Stock of our Company as of March 31, 2017 that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be sold pursuant to this Prospectus includes an equal amountthe beneficial owner of shares underlying such persons Note and Warrant received pursuant thereto, unless otherwise noted in the footnotes below.

+  Represents the shares underlying allmore than 5% of the Notesoutstanding Common Stock; (ii) each officer and Warrants suchdirector of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of Common Stock by our principal stockholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person received pursuant tousing "beneficial ownership" concepts under the Private Placement and other shares held by such person; however, due to the application of Rule 415rules of the Securities Actand Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of 1933, as amended, we are unablea security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to register all of these shares at this time.

++ Representsvote or direct the shares underlying allvoting of the Notes and Warrants such person received pursuantsecurity, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the Private Placement; however, due to the application of Rule 415voting of the Securities Actsecurity. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of 1933, as amended, we are unable to register all of these shares at this time.

(1)Includes: 200,000 shares received from another shareholderand an aggregate of 618,098 shares underlying the securities issued in the Private Placement.
(2)Includes: 82,844 shares received from another shareholderand 128,014 shares underlying the Notes issued in the Private Placement.
(3)

Includes: 150,000 shares from the 419 Transaction; 400,000 shares issued pursuant to the Consulting Agreement dated April 21, 2014; 400,000 shares underlying warrants, exercisable at $0.35 per share, issued pursuant to the extension of a Consulting Agreement; 150,000 shares underlying warrants, exercisable at $0.35 per share, issued pursuant to a short term loan provided by this shareholder; and 150,000 shares underlying warrants, exercisable at $0. 80 per share, issued pursuant to a short term loan provided by this shareholder.

(4)These are shares issued pursuant to Mr. Schoemann’s Consulting Agreement dated April 21, 2014.
(5)Includes: 200,000 shares received from another shareholder and an aggregate of 708,458 shares underlying the securities issued in the Private Placement.
(6)

Includes: 82,844 shares received from another shareholder and 146,729 shares underlying the Notes issued in the Private Placement.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering 1,300,281 shares under the registration statementany security of which this prospectus isthat person has a part. Pursuantright to Rule 415 promulgated underacquire beneficial ownership within sixty (60) days. Under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the 1,300,281 shares being offered for sale by the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus represents less than one-thirdrules of the estimated 5,471,000 shares of common stock we believe will be outstanding and held by non-affiliates as at the date of this prospectus and which we reasonably expect will be offered and sold within two years from the date of this prospectus. In the event that lessSEC, more than 5,471,000 shares our issued and outstanding on the date of this prospectus, we will proportionally reduce the 1,300,281 shares to which this prospectus relates to an amount equal to one-third of such issued and outstanding shares. We have also agreed with the holders of the registered shares to register for resale in future registration statements additional shares of their common stock underlying the Notes and Warrants, to the maximum extent permitted by Rule 415 and the SEC, and at such time as the 1,300,281 shares to which this prospectus relates have been sold.

We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the shares of common stock.

The selling security holders and any of their pledgees, donees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock being offered under this prospectus on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which shares of our common stock are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. The selling security holders may use any one or more of the following methods when disposing of shares:

ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resales by the broker-dealer for its account;
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
privately negotiated transactions;
to cover short sales made after the date that the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part is declared effective by the Commission;
broker-dealers may agree with the selling security holders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
a combination of any of these methods of sale; and
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The shares may also be sold under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), if available, rather than under this prospectus. The selling security holders have the sole and absolute discretion not to accept any purchase offer or make any sale of shares if they deem the purchase price to be unsatisfactory at any particular time.

The selling security holders may pledge their shares to their brokers under the margin provisions of customer agreements. If a selling security holder defaults on a margin loan, the broker may, from time to time, offer and sell the pledged shares.

Broker-dealers engaged by the selling security holders may arrange for other broker-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling security holders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, which commissions as to a particular broker or dealer may be in excess of customary commissions to the extent permitted by applicable law.

If sales of shares offered under this prospectus are made to broker-dealers as principals, we would be required to file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. In the post-effective amendment, we would be required to disclose the names of any participating broker-dealers and the compensation arrangements relating to such sales.

The selling security holders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares offered under this prospectusperson may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaninga beneficial owner of the Securities Act in connection with these sales. Commissions received by these broker-dealers or agentssame securities, and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by thema person may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Any broker-dealers or agents that are deemeda beneficial owner of securities as to be underwriterswhich he/she may not sell shares offered under this prospectus unlesshave any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and until we set forth the namesinvestment power.

Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Stock Beneficially Owned Percentage of Stock Owned (1)
Darwin Fogt, CEO, President and Director3,750,000(2)3.94%
11825 Major Street
Culver City, CA 90230
 
Douglas MacLellan, Chairman3,750,0003.94%
11825 Major Street
Culver City, CA 90230
 
David Markowski, CFO and Director1,100,0001.15%
11825 Major Street
Culver City, CA 90230
 
Curtis Hollister, CTO and Director1,950,0002.05%
11825 Major Street
Culver City, CA 90230
 
Douglas Cole, Director200,0000.21%
11825 Major Street
Culver City, CA 90230
 
Brandon Rowberry, Director200,0000.21%
11825 Major Street
Culver City, CA 90230
 
Rochelle Pleskow, Director00.00%
11825 Major Street
Culver City, CA 90230
 
Bistromatics, Inc. (3)25,280,89026.53%
57 Fireside Cresent
Ottawa ON K1T 1Z3, Canada
  
Director and Officer (7 people)10,950,00011.49%

(1) Applicable percentage ownership as of the underwriters and the material details of their underwriting arrangements in a supplement to this prospectus or, if required, in a replacement prospectus included in a post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectusApril 7, 2017 is a part.

The selling security holders and any other persons participating in the sale or distribution of the shares offered under this prospectus will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations under that act, including Regulation M. These provisions may restrict activities of, and limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares by, the selling security holders or any other person. Furthermore, under Regulation M, persons engaged in a distribution of securities are prohibited from simultaneously engaging in market making and other activities with respect to those securities for a specified period of time prior to the commencement of such distributions, subject to specified exceptions or exemptions. All of these limitations may affect the marketability of the shares.

If any of the shares of common stock offered for sale pursuant to this prospectus are transferred other than pursuant to a sale under this prospectus, then subsequent holders could not use this prospectus until a post-effective amendment or prospectus supplement is filed, naming such holders. We offer no assurance as to whether any of the selling security holders will sell all or any portion of the shares offered under this prospectus.

We have agreed to pay all fees and expenses we incur incident to the registration of the shares being offered under this prospectus. However, each selling security holder and purchaser is responsible for paying any discounts, commissions and similar selling expenses they incur.

We and the selling security holders have agreed to indemnify one another against certain losses, damages and liabilities arising in connection with this prospectus, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

Under the securities laws of some states, the shares of common stock may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the shares of common stock may not be sold unless such shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell any or all of the shares of common stock registered pursuant to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

Once sold under the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, the shares of common stock will be freely tradable in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

Common Stock

As of August 21 , 2015, our authorized capital consists of 100,000,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value. As of August 21, 2015, there were 17,131,000 shares of our common stock outstanding and 0 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding.

The holders of the Company’s common stock:

1. Have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors;

2. Are entitled to share ratably in all of assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of corporate affairs;

3. Do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights; and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights; and

4. Are entitled to one vote per sharebased on all matters on which stockholders may vote.

Holders of the Company’s common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors to be elected, if they so choose, and, in such event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors.

The declaration of any cash dividend will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon earnings, if any, capital requirements and our financial position, general economic conditions, and other pertinent conditions.

All of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. To the extent that additional shares of our common stock are issued, the relative interests of existing stockholders will be diluted.

Notes

The Notes pay a 12.0% cash coupon, payable at maturity (or upon conversion or redemption); accrued unpaid interest shall be payable in common stock upon conversion at the option of the holder. The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt and may not be subordinated to any other debt of the Company, without the appropriate consent from the Note holders. The Notes are secured by the Company’s assets, including cash flow. Following the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission declares this Registration Statement effective, the Notes may be converted by the holders into95,287,581 shares of Common Stock (theoutstanding.
(2) This includes 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock underlyingheld by Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc., which is owned by Mr. Fogt.
(3) Bistromatics, Inc. is controlled by Curtis Hollister, our CTO and directors.

Page 71


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS

Certain Related Party Transactions

Other than the Notesrelationships and transactions discussed below, we are hereinafter referrednot a party to, asnor are we proposed to be a party, to any transaction during the “Note Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.35 per share (the “Conversion Price”). So long as certain contractual conditions are met, if our Common Stock is listed on a U.S. stock exchange and trade, as determined by the daily closing price, for twenty (20) consecutive trading days at or above $1.50 per share, we may redeem the Notes, in cash or shares of common stock and the holder may elect to convert the Notes into Common Stock at the Conversion Price. Uponlast fiscal year involving an Event of Default, which event shall remain un-remedied for a period of sixty (60) days, the Investors shall have the option to require the Company to redeem its outstanding Notes at a price equal to 150% of the principal amount being redeemed, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. As long as any of the Notes shall remain outstanding, the holders shall be extended standard anti-dilution protection with respect to stock splits, stock dividends and recapitalizations affecting any outstanding Notes.

Warrants

The Warrants contain cashless exercise provisions in the event a registration statement registering the Common Stock underlying the Warrants is not effective 180 days after the issuance date and is subject to customary anti-dilution protection and registration rights. The Warrants expire on the third anniversary of the issuance date and have an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share. Each warrant is exercisable for one shares of Common Stock. So long as certain contractual conditions are met, if our Common Stock is listed on a U.S. stock exchange and trade, as determined by the daily closing price, for twenty (20) consecutive trading days at or above $1.50 per share, we may call the Warrants at the Exercise Price, in cash or shares of common stock and the holder may elect to exercise the Warrants at that time. There is also an ownership cap on the Warrants preventing the holder from exercising the Warrant if it would result in such holder owner more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent for our common stock is First American Stock Transfer, Inc. in Phoenix, Arizona.

Interest of Named Experts and Counsel

The validity of the securities offered hereby has been passed upon for us by Hunter Taubman Fischer, LLC, New York, New York. The consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014 included in this prospectusexceeding $120,000 and in the registration statementwhich a related person, as such term is defined by Item 404 of Regulation S-K, had or will have been audited by HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP independent registered public accounting firms, as stated in their respective reports appearing herein.a direct or indirect material interest.

The audited consolidated financial statements of eWellness Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and for the year then ended included in this registration statement have been so included in reliance on the report of Mantyla McReynolds, LLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting. The report (dated April 1, 2014) on the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph describing conditions that raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern, as described more fully in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements.

DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by one of our directors, officers or controlling persons in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by that director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether that indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of that issue.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PAGES 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSF-1
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSF-2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSF-3
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-4 - F-16
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMSF-18 - F-19
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSF-20
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSF-21
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)F-22
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSF-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-24 - F-36

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
  (unaudited)    
ASSETS        
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash $4,604  $900 
Advances - related party  -   7,054 
Prepaid Expenses  89,313   26,274 
Total current assets  93,917   34,228 
Property & equipment, net  6,806   3,231 
Intangible assets, net  21,339   22,816 
TOTAL ASSETS $122,062  $60,275 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $194,151  $174,044 
Accounts payable - related party  45,336   56,155 
Accrued expenses - related party  54,532   30,181 
Accrued compensation  503,000   329,000 
Contingent liability  90,000   90,000 
Short term note and liabilities  24,488   - 
Total current liabilities  911,507   679,380 
Convertible debt, net of discount  431,880   178,433 
Total Liabilities  1,343,387   857,813 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Preferred stock, authorized, 10,000,000 shares, $.001 value, 0 shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, authorized 100,000,000 shares, $.001 par value, 16,881,000 and 16,421,000 issued and outstanding, respectively  16,881   16,421 
Additional paid in capital  1,414,032   1,087,320 
Accumulated deficit  (2,652,238)  (1,901,279)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)  (1,221,325)  (797,538)
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $122,062  $60,275 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

For the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Executive compensation  186,000   183,747   372,000   372,000 
General and administrative  62,284   84,728   96,872   109,760 
Professional fees  149,668   136,814   240,062   174,248 
Research and development - related party  -   -   -   30 
Total Operating Expenses  397,952   405,289   708,934   656,038 
Loss from Operations  (397,952)  (405,289)  (708,934)  (656,038)
                 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                
                 
Gain on extinguishment of debt  -   -   11,323   - 
Interest income  -   (15)  -   7 
Interest expense, related parties  (879)  -   (1,957)  (608)
Interest expense  (35,249)  -   (51,391)  (184)
Net Loss before Income Taxes  (434,080)  (405,304)  (750,959)  (656,823)
Income tax expense  -   -   -   - 
Net Loss $(434,080) $(405,304) $(750,959) $(656,823)
Basic and diluted (loss) per share $(0.03) $(0.03) $(0.04) $(0.04)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding  16,881,000   15,434,714   16,811,276   15,318,006 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

(unaudited)

  For Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
Cash flows from operating activities        
Net loss $(750,959) $(656,823)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  2,109   898 
Contributed services  195,000   3,000 
Shares issued for services  24,222   41,500 
Imputed interest - related party  1,956   608 
Warrants issued for services  22,592   - 
Convertible debt discount amortization  28,944   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities        
Advances - related parties  7,054   (302)
Prepaid expense  (25,726)  (8,936)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  20,108   82,139 
Accounts payable - related party  (10,820)  48,896 
Accrued expenses - related party  24,351   - 
Accrued compensation  174,000   372,000 
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (287,169)  (117,020)
         
Cash flows from investing activities Purchase of equipment  (4,207)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (4,207)  - 
Cash flows from financing activities        
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt  270,080   - 
Promissory note  25,000   130,000 
Net cash provided by financing activities  295,080   130,000 
Net increase in cash  3,704   12,980 
Cash, beginning of period  900   - 
Cash, end of period $4,604  $12,980 
         
Supplemental Information:        
Cash paid for:        
Taxes $-  $50 
Interest Expense $-  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. The Company

The Company and Nature of Business

eWellness Healthcare Corporation (f/k/a Dignyte, Inc.), (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 7, 2011, to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. The Company has generated no revenues to date.Related Party Debt: Prior to the Share Exchange Agreement discussed below, other than issuing shares to its original shareholder, the Company never commenced any operational activities.

eWellness was incorporated in Nevada in May 2013. Following a share exchange detailed below we completed in April 2014, pursuant to whicheWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation became our wholly owned subsidiary,we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing eWellness Corporation’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. Our historical business and operations will continue independently. eWellness is an early-stage Los Angeles based corporation that seeks to provide a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Programs utilizing its proprietaryWWW.PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform initially to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems, in addition to in-office sessions. Based on today’s insurance landscape, our main revenue source shall come from a combination of in-office and telemedicine visits. Amid ongoing challenges and changes within the healthcare industry, telemedicine is emerging as an increasingly attractive tool for delivering quality medical services.

Share Exchange Agreement

On April 11, 2014, Digntye, Inc. (“Dignyte”), a publicly held Nevada corporation and eWellness Corporation (“Private Co”), a privately held company incorporated in Nevada, executed a Share Exchange Agreement (or “Initial Exchange Agreement”). Prior to the execution and delivery of the final Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”), the Board of Directors of Dignyte approved the Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Similarly, the Board of Directors of the Private Co. approved the exchange. On April 25, 2014, immediately prior to the execution and delivery of the Agreement, Dignyte amended its certificate of incorporation to change its corporate name from “Dignyte, Inc.” to “eWellness Healthcare Corporation.”

Pursuant to the Agreement, eWellness Healthcare Corporation issued 9,200,000 shares of unregistered common stock, $.001 par value (the “common stock”) to the shareholders of the Private Co. in exchange for all outstanding shares of the Private Co.’s common stock. In addition, our former chief executive officer agreed: (i) to tender 5,000,000 shares of common stock back to the Company for cancellation; (ii) assign from his holdings, an additional 2,500,000 shares to the shareholders of the Private Co. resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders; and, (iii) to a further assignment of an additional 2,100,000 shares to other parties as stated therein (collectively, the “CEO Stock Actions”).

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, we closed the Share Exchange. As a result, the Private Co. shareholders own approximately 76.97% of our issued and outstanding common stock, after giving effect to CEO Stock Actions.

Following the Share Exchange, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing the Private Co.’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. The Private Co. is the surviving company under the share exchange and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For financial reporting purposes, the Share Exchange represents a “reverse merger” rather than a business combination. Consequently, thetransaction is accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization. eWellness Corporation is the acquirer for financial reporting purposes and Dignyte, Inc. is the acquired company. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations that are reflected in the historical financial statements prior to the transactions are those of eWellness Corporation and are recorded at the historical cost basis of eWellness Corporation, and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the transaction include the assets, liabilities and operations of eWellness Healthcare Corporation, and eWellness Corporation from the closing date of the transaction. Additionally all historical equity accounts and awards of eWellness Corporation, including par value per share, share and per share numbers, have been adjusted to reflect the number of shares received in the transaction.

The foregoing description of the Share Exchange Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the Share Exchange Agreement, a copy of which is attached to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2014. At the execution of the Share Exchange Agreement, the total number of shares of common stock outstanding was 15,200,000.

The Company is in the initial phase of developing a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Programs (“DMpt”) to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic.The Company’s activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including failure to secure funding to operationalize the Company’s business plan.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The interim financial information of the Company as of periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 is unaudited. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 is derived from audited financial statements of eWellness Healthcare Corporation. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they omit or condense footnotes and certain other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The accounting policies followed for quarterly financial reporting conform to the accounting policies disclosed in ASU 2014-10. In the opinion of management, all adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the interim periods reported have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2015. The unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these good faith estimates and judgments.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Going Concern

For the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company has no revenues and no operations. The Company has an accumulated loss of $2,652,238. In view of these matters, there is substantive doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as2016, a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue operations is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations, of which there can be no guarantee. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue asrelated party, a going concern.

Deferred Offering and Acquisition Costs

The Company defers as other assets the direct incremental costs of raising capital until such time as the offering is completed. At the time of the completion of the offering, the costs will be charged against the capital raised. Should the offering be terminated, the deferred offering costs will be charged to operations during the periodcompany in which the offering is terminated. Direct acquisition costs will be expensed as incurred.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company complies with the accounting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820-10,Fair Value Measurements, as well as certain related FASB staff positions. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact business and considers assumptions that marketplace participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy for measurements of fair value as follows:

Level 1 – quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not have Level 1, 2, or 3 financial assets or liabilities.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes all cash deposits and highly liquid financial instruments with an original maturity to the Company of three months or less.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of assets with useful lives longer than one year. Useful lives for assets have been determined to be 5 years for the Company.

Revenue Recognition

The Company has yet to realize revenues from operations. Once the Company has commenced operations, it will recognize revenues when delivery of goods or completion of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers, the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable is probable.

Loss per Common Share

The Company follows ASC Topic 260 to account for the loss per share. Basic loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During periods when common stock equivalents, if any, are anti-dilutive they are not considered in the computation. As the Company has no common stock equivalents and has incurred losses for the period ended June 30, 2015, no dilutive shares are added into the loss per share calculations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that are adopted by the Company as of the specified date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements presentation.

Note 3. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of computer equipment that is stated at cost $8,420 and $4,214 less accumulated depreciation of $1,615 and $983 at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Depreciation expense was $632 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $421 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is five years for computer equipment.

Note 4. Intangible Assets

The Company recognizes the cost of a software license and a license for use of a programming code as intangible assets. The stated cost of these assets were $24,770 and $24,770 less accumulated amortization of $3,431 and $1,954 for the periods ended June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. For the periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the amortization expense recorded was $1,477 and $477, respectively.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5. Related Party Transactions

A company for which the Company’sour former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO is also servingserved as CFO, has paid $79,890$91,271 on behalf of the Company’s behalf.Company. The amount outstanding as of June 30, 2015December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2014 was $45,3362015 were $10,481 and $56,155,$43,717, respectively. TheDuring the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $1,976 and $608$4,156 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party based onat an interest rate of 8% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively.

During 2014,. The debt remains a Company liability, which is to be repaid when the Company entered into a licensehas sufficient capital to do so and there is no specific time frame within which such repayment must be made.

Programming Agreement

On November 11, 2016, the Company signed an agreement with a programming company in("PC") within which the one of ourthe Company's directors and Chief Technical Officer is the Chief Marketing Officer. ThroughThe agreement is for additional features to be programmed for the licensing agreement, we obtainedlaunch of the PHIZIO platform. The contract specifies that the Company's CEO and CTO will retain their officer and director positions and retain their past due accrued compensation through June 30, 2016. The Company is to pay a perpetual licensemonthly base fee of $100,000 for the development and compensation for the Company's CEO and CTO. Following payment of the initial $100,000, the Company is obligated to only pay $50,000 monthly until the PC has successfully signed and collected the first monthly service fee for 100 physical therapy clinics to use the PHIZIO platform. The agreement establishes that the Company is indebted to the PC for $225,000 for past programming code createdservices. For this amount, the PC will be issued 25,280,899 common shares at a cost value of $0.0089. These shares were issued in April 2017. The PC will also have the right to appoint 40% of the directors. At the end of December 31, 2016, the Company had a payable of $285,000 due to this company.

Operating Agreement: On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy ("EPT"), a company owned by our CEO, pursuant to which EPT operate our Platform and offers it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. The Company will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments. On May 7, 2015, EPT inducted the first patient using our platform. The total (insurance reimbursed) monitored PHZIO visits in 2015 and 2016 was 1,928 total patient visits that include: 2015: 699 patient visits (239 insurance reimbursed patient visits generating approximately $13,500.00 in gross revenue) and in 2016: 1,229 patient visits generating $1,496.55 (approximately 26 insurance reimbursed visits). These gross revenue figures were not sufficient to generate any gross sales for the Company. The average insurance reimbursement per PHZIO session in 2015 and 2016 was $56.87 (excluding co-payments). Respectively. The top line wellness goals of our program are to graduate at least 80% of inducted patients through our 6-month program. Patients should expect to experience an average of a video management platform as20% reduction in BMI, a base4-inch reduction in waist size, weight loss of at least 20 pounds, significant overall improvement in balance, coordination, flexibility, strength, and lumbopelvic stability. Patients also should score better on Functional Outcomes Scales (Oswestry and LEFS), which indicates improved functional activity levels due to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000. The license fee is recorded as an Intangible Assetreduced low back, knee and Accounts Payable on the Balance Sheet.hip pain.

Office Space: The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from Evolution Physical Therapy ("Evolution"), a company owned by our CEO. The imputedEvolution has agreed contribute the annual rent expensefor the year ended December 31, 2016 towards founding eWellness and its operations; the market value of such rent is $500 per month ismonth. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded rent expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

Indebtedness of Management

No officer, director or security holder known to us to own of record or beneficially more than 5% of our Common stock or any member of the immediate family or sharing the household (other than a tenant or employee) of any of the foregoing persons is indebted to us in the years 2016 and 2015.

Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Party Transactions

Our Board of Directors conducts an appropriate review of and oversees all related-party transactions. We have not yet adopted formal standards in respect of the review and approval or ratification of related-party transactions; however, our board has conformed to the following standards: (i) all related-party transactions must be fair and reasonable to us and on terms comparable to those reasonably expected to be agreed to with independent third parties for the same goods and/or services at the time authorized by the board; and (ii) all related-party transactions must be authorized, approved or ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors who have no interest, either directly or indirectly, in any such related party transaction.

Page 72


eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

9,519,229 SHARES OF Common Stock

PROSPECTUS

YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT OR THAT WE HAVE REFERRED YOU TO. WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL Common Stock AND IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY Common Stock IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.

Until _____________, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities whether or not participating in this Offering may be required to deliver a Prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer's obligation to deliver a Prospectus when acting as underwriters.

The officersDate of This Prospectus is April __, 2017

Page 73


PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee$106
Accounting fees and expenses$1,000
Legal fees and expense$30,000
Total$31,106

All amounts are estimates other than the Commission's registration fee. We are paying all expenses of the Company incur personalOffering listed above. No portion of these expenses will be borne by the Selling Shareholders. The Selling Shareholders, however, will pay any other expenses incurred in selling their Common Stock, including any brokerage commissions or costs of sale.

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our articles of incorporation, by-laws and director indemnification agreements provide that each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is otherwise involved (including, without limitation, as a witness) in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or an officer of Brenham or, in the case of a director, is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, or trustee of another corporation, or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director, officer or trustee or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer or trustee, shall be indemnified and held harmless by us to the fullest extent authorized by the Nevada General Corporation Law against all expense, liability and loss reasonably incurred or suffered by such.

Section 145 of the Nevada General Corporation Law permits a corporation to indemnify any director or officer of the corporation against expenses (including attorney's fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any action, suit or proceeding brought by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the corporation, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner that he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, if he or she had no reason to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. In a derivative action, ( i.e ., one brought by or on behalf of the Company. The amounts outstanding ascorporation), indemnification may be provided only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred by any director or officer in connection with the defense or settlement of June 30, 2015such an action or suit if such person acted in good faith and December 31, 2014 were $54,532 and $30,181, respectively.

Note 6. Income Taxes

The tax provision for interim periods is determined using an estimatein a manner that he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Company’s effective tax ratecorporation, except that no indemnification shall be provided if such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought shall determine that the defendant is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses despite such adjudication of liability.

Pursuant to Section 102(b)(7) of the full year adjustedNevada General Corporation Law, Article Seven of our articles of incorporation eliminates the liability of a director to us for discrete items, ifmonetary damages for such a breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liabilities arising:

Ÿfrom any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to us;
Ÿfrom acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
Ÿunder Section 174 of the Nevada General Corporation Law; and
Ÿ from any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

Page 74


Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Sales of Unregistered Securities in 2014:

On April 30, 2014, we issued 9,200,000 shares pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement.

On May 9, 2014, we issued 400,000 shares pursuant to a consulting agreement valued at $40,000 and 3,000 pursuant to a verbal agreement related to compensation for website services provided to the Company valued at $1,500.

On October 16, 2014, we issued 618,000 shares to two consultants pursuant to consulting agreements valued at $61,800.

On October 16, 2014, we issued 200,000 shares to one of our directors for services valued at $2,000.

On December 23, 2014, we issued $213,337 Series A Senior Convertible Redeemable Notes that are takenconvertible into account609,532 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 609,532 shares of our Common Stock.

Sales of Unregistered Securities in the relevant period. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if the estimated tax rate changes, the Company makes a cumulative adjustment.

At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, net of expected reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities, as it believes it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized.

The Company did not identify any material uncertain tax positions of the Company on returns that have been filed or that will be filed. The Company has not had operations and has deferred items consisting entirely of

unused Net Operating Losses.. Since it is not thought that this Net Operating Loss will ever produce a tax benefit, even if examined by taxing authorities and disallowed entirely, there would be no effect on the financial statements.

The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. For the periods ended June 30 2015, and June 30, 2014 the Company did not recognize nor accrue for any interest or penalties.

Note 7. Non-Convertible Notes Payable2015:

On January 27,24, 2015, we extended the Companyterm of an outstanding consulting and service agreement, pursuant to which we issued 400,000 shares valued at $40,000 and 400,000 callable Common Stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share.

On February 23, 2015, we entered into a promissory noteone-year agreement with a shareholder for $20,000consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters and issued 60,000 shares valued at an interest rate of 12% due and payable on April 23, 2015. $6,000.

On April 9, 2015, as partwe issued $270,080 Notes (including an aggregate of $123,980 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) that are initially convertible into 771,657 shares of our Common Stock, pursuant to a private financing; we sold that same amount of Series A Senior Convertible Redeemable Notes convertible into shares of the second closingCompany's Common Stock, at $0.35 per share and Series A Warrants, all pursuant to separate Securities Purchase Agreements entered into with each investor. The Warrants are exercisable to purchase up to 771,657 shares of the convertible debt discussed in Note 8 below, the note for $20,000, accrued interest for $3,980 through March 31, 2015 and future consulting fees due and payable through October 2015 totaling $100,000 were converted to a convertible note totaling $123,980.11. The consulting fees for future months were booked to prepaid expense and are being amortized over the remaining time of the consulting agreement.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Common Stock.

On May 27,30, 2015, the Company received $25,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Notepromissory note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stockCommon Stock at $.35 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $768. For the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $118 of accrued interest for this note.

Note 8. Convertible Notes Payable

On December 23, 2014 the Company issued $213,337 convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase shares of common stock to four individual investors. The overall terms of the Notes are as follows:

Interest rate: 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $9,907 of accrued interest.
Due date: December 31, 2015. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due date.
Redemption right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $1.50 for 20 consecutive trading days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Notes, following written notice to the holders of the Notes.
Optional Conversion: At the option of the holders, the Notes may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.35 per share.
Additionally, if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holders have the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or to convert all or any portion of the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock.
The conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.
The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder.
Warrants: The holders of the Notes are granted the right through December 31, 2015 to purchase 609,534 additional shares of common stock at $.35 per share.

During the time that any portion of these Notes are outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holders at its option have the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to elect to convert the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed above.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note:

  June 30, 2015 
Principal amount $213,337 
Unamortized debt discount  (17,452)
Net carrying amount $195,885 

The Company valued the cash conversion feature as the different in the value of the Note at its stated interest rate of 12% and the fair value of the Note at its discounted value using an expected borrowing rate of 18%.

On April 9, 2015, the Company issued $270,080 convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) (including an aggregate of $123,980 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) and warrants to purchase shares of common stock to eight individual investors. The overall terms of the Notes are as follows:

Interest rate: 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $7,382 of accrued interest.
Due date: April 30, 2016. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due date.
Redemption right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $1.50 for 20 consecutive trading days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Notes, following written notice to the holders of the Notes.
Optional Conversion: At the option of the holders, the Notes may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.35 per share.
Additionally, if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holders have the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or to convert all or any portion of the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock.
The conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.
The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder.

Warrants: The holders of the Notes are granted the right through April 30, 2016 to purchase 771,658 additional shares of common stock at $.35 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $1,132.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

During the time that any portion of these Notes are outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holders at its option have the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to elect to convert the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed above.
The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note:

  June 30, 2015 
Principal amount $270,080 
Unamortized debt discount  (34.085)
Net carrying amount $235,995 

The Company valued the cash conversion feature as the difference in the value of the Note at its stated interest rate of 12% and the fair value of the Note at its discounted value using an expected borrowing rate of 18%. The value of the cash conversion feature at inception of the notes was $44,189.

For the period ended June 30, 2015, none of the debt had been converted and no warrants to purchase common stock had been exercised.

Under the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the common shares of the Company, pending being listed on the OTC, and the net settlement requirements of the warrants will be analyzed at the end of each quarter to determine if the conversion does become readily convertible to cash which would require derivative accounting calculations and recording.

Note 9. Preferred and Common Stock

Preferred Stock

The total number of shares of preferred stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 10,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001. There have been no preferred shares issued as of June 30, 2015.

Common Stock

The total number of shares of common stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 100,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001.

On January 24, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares for consulting services at a value of $40,000 that will be amortized over the life of the contract.

On February 23, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 60,000 shares for consulting services for a value of $6,000 that will be amortized over the life of the contract

As of the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company has 16,881,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

F-11

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held at all stockholders’ meetings for all purposes including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

No holder of shares of stock of any class is entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for or purchase or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class or of securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of dividend.

Warrants

On January 24, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 warrants that were issued as part of a consulting agreement extension that expired on October 21, 2015. The fair value of the warrants is $32,187 and the Company recorded $17,882 as consulting expense and $14,305 as prepaid expense to be amortized over the life of the contract which expires in October 2015.

On May 20, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance ofissued 250,000 warrants that were issued as part of anto purchase Common Stock at $.35 per share in connection with a financial advisory services agreement. The fair value of the warrants is $4,598 and the Company recorded this as consulting expense.

On May 20, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 warrants that were issued as part ofsigned an strategic advisory services agreement. The fair value of the warrants is $1,342 and the Company recorded $112 as consulting expense and $1,230 as prepaid expense to be amortized over the life of the contract which expires May 20, 2016.

The following is a summary of the status of all of the Company’s warrants as of June 30, 2015 and changes during the six months ended on that date:

      Weighted 
   Number of  Average 
   Warrants  Exercise Price 
Outstanding at January 1, 2015   609,533  $0.35 
Granted   1,821,658  $0.35 
Exercised   -  $- 
Cancelled   -  $- 
Outstanding at June 30, 2015   2,431,191  $0.35 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For purpose of determining the fair market value of the warrants issued during the three months ended June 30, 2015, we used the Black Scholes option valuation model. These valuations were done throughout the period at the date of issuance and not necessary as of the reporting date. As there is no current market for the Company’s shares, we used $0.10 as the stock price at valuation date to be consistent with prior issuances and the stock prices of comparable companies to determine volatility. The significant assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation of the date of issuance are as follows:

Stock price on the valuation date $0.10
Exercise price of warrants $0.35 
Dividend yield  0.00%
Years to maturity  1.5 – 5.0 
Risk free rate  .029% - 1.57%
Expected volatility  55% - 56%

Note 10. Commitments, Contingencies

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure,agreement pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed fundsissued 250,000 warrants to purchase Common Stock at $.35 per share.

On July 14, 2015, the Company issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative workCommon Stock valued at $.35 per share for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investorsconversion of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return$87,500 of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust accountshall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document (which was essentially a form of rescission) was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

F-13

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

As disclosed therein, we filed the amendments to the initial Form 8-K in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to an alleged violation of Rule 419. The Company continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, but was unable to satisfy the SEC’s concerns. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

As a result of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. As a result of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure tostrictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption.In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

convertible debt.

On or about June 23, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Bistromatics Corp., to which one of our directors is Chief Marketing Officer, pursuant to which we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000 due by September 31, 2014. The parties entered into an addendum extending the due date of the license fee to December 31, 2014 and another addendum extending it to July 1, 2015. Intellectual property developed as a result of this license, will be our property; but Bistromatics will retain the intellectual property for the original code base. We may resell or license the resulting telemedicine platform for an extended license fee of $10,000 for each additional instance the code base will be used. Through this agreement, Bistromatics Corp. built our PHZIO.com platform; our director purchased the domain name on behalf of the Company and retains no rights to same.

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The rental agreement provides for the value of the rent of $500 per month be recorded as contributed towards the founding eWellness and its operations. During the period ended June 30, 2015, we have recorded this rent payment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital on the Balance Sheet.

In May 2014, the Company signed an Office Service Agreement for office space in New York, New York. A deposit of $17,874 was paid and recorded in prepaid expense. The utilization of the office space began on August 1, 2014 and terminated at December 31, 2014. The Company negotiated a settlement of $5,500 in April, 2015 for the cancellation of the agreement. The settlement resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $11,323.

F-14

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On January 24,15, 2015, the Company received $20,000$18,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum. For the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $447 of accrued interest for this note. On April 9, 2015, thispromissory note and accrued interest through March 31, 2015 was converted into convertible debt.

On January 24, 2015 the Company extended a previous consulting and service agreement with a consultant from April 21, 2015 to October 20, 2015 for which the Company shall issue 400,000 shares of restricted common stock and 400,000 callable common stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share. These shares were issued on April 9, 2015. With this extension agreement, the Company is to pay $10,000 per month consulting fee beginning with February 1, 2015 through the end of the agreement. As discussed in Footnote 7 above, the full $100,000 consulting fees were rolled into a convertible note. The fees for months after the period ended June 30, 2015, are recorded in prepaid expense and are being amortized over the life of the contract extension.

On February 14, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with BMT, Inc. as a consultant and advisor in connection with certain business development advisory. This agreement is on an at-will basis as determined by the company in exchange for cash compensation to be invoiced monthly. The total compensation paid as of June 30, 2015 on this agreement is $11,950.

On February 23, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters in exchange for 60,000 shares of restricted common stock. These shares were issued on April 14, 2015.

On March 16, 2015, the Company extended a $20,000 licensing fee payment agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. pertaining to intellectual property utilized by the company until July 1, 2015. The Company made an initial payment of $5,000 with the remaining fees to be to be paid on or before July 1, 2015.

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy (“EPT”), a company owned by one of the Company’s officers, wherein it is agreed that EPT would be able to operate the Company’s telemedicine platformwww.phzio.com and offer it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. The Company is to receive 75% of the net insurance reimbursements from the patient for use of the platform. The Company will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating thewww.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments – computer equipment, office or facilities rental payments, physical therapist or physical therapy assistant, administrative staff, patient induction equipment, office supplies, utilities and other associated operating costs. It is anticipated that the operation of the platform by EPT will generate positive cash flow within 90 days from the start of patient induction.

On April 17, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Akash Bajaj, M.D., M.P.H. The agreement is for Dr. Bajaj to serve as a consultant and as the Chairman of the Company’s Clinical Advisory Board. The term of the agreement is for one year with annual renewal as desired. The agreement further sets the hourly rate to be paid at $225 per hour with payment to be at the end of each month. Further, the Company granted Dr. Bajaj a five-year non-statutory option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.35 per share. The options will vest over a 12 month period at 8,333 per month. The value of the options are deemed to be zero since the Board of Directors have not yet approved the issuant of the options.

On May 20, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with a strategic advisory services company. The term of the contract begins on the effective date and can be terminated within 30 days upon written notice by either party. The Company is to pay the consultant a monthly retainer fee of $10,000 that is deferred until the Company raises $250,000 in new investor funds from the effective date. In addition, the Company granted the consultant 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On May 20, 2015, the Company entered into a one year agreement with financial advisory company. As the retainer, the Company granted the consultant 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share.

On May 27, 2015, the Company received $25,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stockCommon Stock at $.80 per share.

On August 19, 2015, the Company issuance 96,000 shares valued at $.35 per share. Forshare for the period ended June 30,conversion of $33,600 of convertible debt.

On August 26, 2015, the Company recorded $118extended the term of accrued interestthe $25,000 promissory note issued on May 30, 2015 that was originally due on August 28 2015 to October 23, 2015. As consideration for this note.

From time to timethe extension the Company may become a partyagreed to litigation matters involving claims againstan annual interest rate of 12% retroactive to the Company. Except as may be outlined above, management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect onoriginal date of the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 11. Segment Reporting

Thenote and issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company has one operating segment, which was identified based upon the availability of discrete financial information and the chief operating decision makers’ regular review of financial information.

Note 12. Subsequent Events

Common Stock at $.80 per share.

On July 15,September 10, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 663,277 shares valued at $.35 per share for the conversion of $232,147 of convertible debt.

On September 16, 2015, the Company received $18,000$2,500 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Notepromissory note at an interest rate of 5%12% per annum.annum and a risky loan fee of $625. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,00050,000 warrants to purchase Company common stockCommon Stock at $.80 per share.

On July 22,September 16, 2015, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, eWellness Corporation, was merged into the Company received $12,500 in exchange for a 90-day promissory note at an interest rate of 12% per annum and therefore, no longer exists as a separate entity.

On July 30, 2015,risky loan fee of $3,125. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 250,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share.

On September 16, 2015, the Company received $22,500 in exchange for a 90-day promissory note at an interest rate of 12% per annum and a risky loan fee of $5,625. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 450,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share.

On October 1, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 50,273 shares of common stockCommon Stock for the accrued interest on the debt conversions on July 14, 2015, August 19, 2015, and September 10, 2015. The shares were issued at $.35 per share.

On October 5, 2015, the Company extended the term of an $18,000 promissory note originally issued on May 15, 2015 that was originally due on October 13, 2015 to December 14, 2015; however, as consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to repay the note, plus interest and the Loan Fee (as hereinafter defined), upon receipt of additional financing. Interest on the note accrues at the rate of 12% per annum. Unless paid sooner as previously explained, the Company shall pay $4,500 on the maturity date of the note. As additional inducement for the extension, the Company also agreed to issue the lender five-year warrants to purchase up to 150,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at $0.80 per share.

On October 11, 2015, the Company extended the term of an $25,000 promissory note issued on July 15, 2015 that was due on October 23, 2015 to December 14, 2015; however, as a consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to repay the note, plus interest and a risk loan fee of $6,250. As additional inducement for the extension, the Company also agreed to issue the lender five-year warrants to purchase up to 150,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.80 per share.

On October 11, 2015, the Company received $10,000 in exchange for a 60-day promissory note at an interest rate of 12% per annum and a risky loan fee of $2,500. As an inducement for the promissory note, the Company issued 200,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share. The note, accrued interest and risky loan fee is due on December 14, 2015.

On November 11, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 179,988 shares of Common Stock for the conversion of $87,500$57,670 of convertible debt.principal and $5,326 of accrued interest. These shares were issued at $.35 per share.

On AugustDecember 6, 2015, the BoardCompany entered into a 90-day Promissory Note for $70,000 at an interest rate of Directors appointed Ms. Rochelle Pleskow as12% per annum plus a risky loan fee of $17,500 which is being amortized over the seventh memberterm of the Boardloan. As an inducement the Company issued 1,400,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at $.80 per share. The Company further agreed to repay the loan within three days of Directors, effective immediately. Ms. Pleskow isthe Company receiving $500,000 or more in the current headprivate placement of Healthcare Informatics at HP,up to $2,500,000 convertible note with warrants. This Promissory Note resulted from the principal payment to the note holder of $28,222 and the Board is confident that Ms. Pleskow can add value toholder cancelling the Company’s PHZIO platform through helping to create better patient outcome data. The Company agreed to pay Ms. Pleskow $2,000 per month fees, which shall accrue as ofnotes originally signed on May 27, 2015 plus extensions, July 1,15, 2015 plus extensions, September 16, 2015 and be paid uponOctober 11, 2015.

On December 11, 2015, the first closingCompany entered into a securities purchase agreement with an accredited investor for (i) a note in the principal amount of our next financing, plus$275,000 at a 10% original issue discount , (ii) a warrant to purchase 250,000 5-year stock options at ashares of the Company's Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.80 per share. She shall also be eligible to receive any other benefitsshare and (iii) 50,000 shares as an additional fee for a value of $5,000.

Sales of Unregistered Securities in 2016:

On January 20, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 50,000 shares for consulting services for a value of $5,000 that are offered to other directors.is being amortized over twelve months.

On February 29, 2016, the Company authorized the issuance of 227,232 shares for conversion of convertible debt of $69,500 and accrued interest of $10,031.

On August 6, 2015,March 3, 2016, the BoardCompany authorized the issuance of Directors approved100,000 shares for consulting services for a value of $10,100 that is being amortized over six months.

On March 11, 2016, the 2015 Stock Option Plan, pursuant to which certain directors, officers, employees and consultants will be eligibleCompany authorized the issuance of 150,000 shares for certain stock options and grants. The Planconsulting services for a value of $15,000 that is effective as of August 1, 2015 and the maximum number of shares reserved and available for granting awards underbeing amortized over twelve months.

On June 2, 2016, the Plan shall bean aggregate of 3,000,000Company sold 120,000 shares of common stock provided however thaton each January 1, starting with January 1, 2016, an additional numberupon receipt of shares equal to the lesser of (A) 2% of the outstanding number of shares (on a fully-diluted basis) on the immediately preceding December 31 and (B) such lower number of shares as may be determined by the Board or committee charged with administering the plan. This plan may be amended at any time by the Board or appointed plan Committee.

$120,000 cash.

On August 11, 2015,July 13, 2016, the Company signed an addendum to the licensing agreement with Bistromatics to extend the payment of the licensing fee to October 31, 2015.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND DECEMBER 31, 2013

PAGES
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMSF-18 - F-19
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSF-20
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSF-21
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)F-22
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSF-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-24 - F-36

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

(Formerly Dignyte, Inc.)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of eWellness Healthcare Corporation (formerly Dignyte, Inc.) as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of eWellness Healthcare Corporation (formerly Dignyte, Inc.) as of December 31, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficit, a deficit in stockholders’ equity and has sustained recurring losses from operations. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans with regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 7, 2015

F-18

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders

eWellness Corporation (currently d.b.a. eWellness Healthcare Corporation)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of eWellness Corporation (currently d.b.a. eWellness Healthcare Corporation) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013, and the related statement of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of eWellness Corporation as of December 31, 2013, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company had no revenues, experienced losses from operations, and no positive operating cash flows from operations during the year ended December 31, 2013. These issues raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Mantyla McReynolds, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 1, 2014

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 
       
ASSETS        
         
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash $900  $- 
Advances - related party  7,054   - 
Prepaid Expenses  26,274   4,770 
         
Total current assets  34,228   4,770 
         
Property & equipment, net  3,231   4,074 
         
Intangible assets, net  22,816   - 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $60,275  $8,844 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $174,044  $- 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party  56,155   - 
Accrued expenses - related party  30,181     
Accrued compensation  329,000   - 
Contingent liability  90,000   - 
         
Total current liabilities  679,380   - 
         
Convertible debt, net of discount  178,433   - 
         
Total Liabilities  857,813   - 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Preferred stock, authorized, 10,000,000 shares, $.001 value, 0 shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, authorized 100,000,000 shares, $.001 par value, 16,421,000 and 9,200,000 issued and outstanding, respectively  16,421   9,200 
Shares to be issued  -   - 
Additional paid in capital  1,087,320   561,338 
Accumulated deficit  (1,901,279)  (561,694)
         
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)  (797,538)  8,844 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $60,275  $8,844 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  For Year Ended 
  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 
       
TOTAL REVENUE $-  $- 
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Executive compensation  744,000   423,000 
General and administrative  231,124   40,930 
Professional fees  259,856   - 
Contingent liability expense  90,000   - 
Research and development - related party  30   2,706 
         
Total Operating Expenses  1,325,010   466,636 
         
Loss from Operations  (1,325,010)  (466,636)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Gain on extinguishment of debt  1,200   - 
Interest income  7   - 
Interest expense, related parties  (2,708)  - 
Interest expense  (13,074)  - 
         
Loss before Income Taxes  (1,339,585)  (466,636)
         
Income tax expense  -   - 
         
Net Loss $(1,339,585) $(466,636)
         
Basic and diluted (loss) per share $(0.10) $(0.05)
         
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding  13,698,896   9,200,000 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-21

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

        Additional     Total 
  Preferred Shares  Common Shares  Paid in  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Deficit 
                      
Balance at December 31, 2012  -  $-   -  $-  $95,058  $(95,058) $- 
                             
Common stock issued at incorporation          9,200,000   9,200   (200)      9,000 
                             
Contributed services                  414,000       414,000 
                             
Expenses paid and assets contributed by shareholders                  52,480       52,480 
                             
Net loss                      (466,636)  (466,636)
                             
Balance at December 31, 2013  -   -   9,200,000   9,200   561,338   (561,694)  8,844 
                             
Imputed interest                  2,708       2,708 
                             
Contributed services                  390,000       390,000 
                             
Recapitalization at merger          6,000,000   6,000   (22,509)      (16,509)
                             
Shares issued for services @ $.10/share          1,221,000   1,221   120,879       122,100 
                             
Convertible debt discount                  34,904       34,904 
                             
Net loss                      (1,339,585)  (1,339,585)
                             
Balance at December 31, 2014  -  $-   16,421,000  $16,421  $1,087,320  $(1,901,279) $(797,538)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  For Year Ended 
  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 
       
Cash flows from operating activities        
Net loss $(1,339,585) $(466,636)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  2,797   140 
Contributed services  390,000   423,000 
Expenses paid by shareholders  -   43,496 
Shares issued for services  122,100   - 
Convertible debt discount  34,904   - 
Imputed interest - related party  2,708   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities        
Advances - related parties  (7,054)  - 
Prepaid expense  (26,274)  - 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  67,535   - 
Accounts payable - related party  56,155   - 
Accrued expenses - related party  30,181   - 
Contingent liability  90,000   - 
Accrued compensation  329,000   - 
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (247,533)  - 
         
Cash flows from investing activities        
Intangible asset purchase  (20,000)  - 
Cash acquired in merger  90,000   - 
         
Net cash provided by investing activities  70,000   - 
         
Cash flows from financing activities        
Convertible loan payable proceeds  178,433   - 
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  178,433   - 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  900   - 
         
Cash, beginning of period  -   - 
         
Cash, end of period $900  $- 
         
Supplemental Information:        
Cash paid for:        
Taxes $-  $- 
Interest Expense $-  $- 
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities        
Assets contributed by shareholders $-  $8,844 
Prepaid expense transferred to intangible assets $4,770  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. The Company

The Company and Nature of Business

eWellness Healthcare Corporation (f/k/a Dignyte, Inc.), (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 7, 2011, to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. The Company has generated no revenues to date. Prior to the Share Exchange Agreement discussed below, other than issuing shares to its original shareholder, the Company never commenced any operational activities.

eWellness was incorporated in Nevada in May 2013. Following a share exchange detailed below we completed in April 2014, pursuant to whicheWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation became our wholly owned subsidiary,we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing eWellness Corporation’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. Our historical business and operations will continue independently. eWellness is an early-stage Los Angeles based corporation that seeks to provide a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Programs utilizing its proprietaryWWW.PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform initially to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems, in addition to in-office sessions. Based on today’s insurance landscape, our main revenue source shall come from a combination of in-office and telemedicine visits. Amid ongoing challenges and changes within the healthcare industry, telemedicine is emerging as an increasingly attractive tool for delivering quality medical services.

Share Exchange Agreement

On April 11, 2014, Digntye, Inc. (“Dignyte”), a publicly held Nevada corporation and eWellness Corporation (“Private Co”), a privately held company incorporated in Nevada, executed a Share Exchange Agreement (or “Initial Exchange Agreement”). Prior to the execution and delivery of the final Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”), the Board of Directors of Dignyte approved the Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Similarly, the Board of Directors of the Private Co. approved the exchange. On April 25, 2014, immediately prior to the execution and delivery of the Agreement, Dignyte amended its certificate of incorporation to change its corporate name from “Dignyte, Inc.” to “eWellness Healthcare Corporation.”

Pursuant to the Agreement, eWellness Healthcare Corporation issued 9,200,000 shares of unregistered common stock, $.001 par value (the “common stock”) to the shareholders of the Private Co. in exchange for all outstanding shares of the Private Co.’s common stock. In addition, our former chief executive officer agreed: (i) to tender 5,000,000172,958 shares of common stock back tobecause of warrants being exercised through a cashless exercise.

On December 14, 2016, the Company for cancellation; (ii) assign from his holdings, an additional 2,500,000issued 90,364 shares to the shareholders of the Private Co. resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders; and, (iii) to a further assignment of an additional 2,100,000 shares to other parties as stated therein (collectively, the “CEO Stock Actions”).

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, we closed the Share Exchange. As a result, the Private Co. shareholders own approximately 76.97% of our issued and outstanding common stock after giving effect to CEO Stock Actions.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Following the Share Exchange, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing the Private Co.’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. The Private Co. is the surviving company under the share exchange and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

For financial reporting purposes, the Share Exchange represents a “reverse merger” rather than a business combination and eWellness is deemed to be the accounting acquirer in the transaction. The Share Exchange is being accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization. eWellness is the acquirer for financial reporting purposes and the Company (eWellness Healthcare Corporation, formerly known as Dignyte, Inc.) is the acquired company. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations that will be reflected in the historical financial statements prior to the Share Exchange will be those of eWellness and will be recorded at the historical cost basis of eWellness, and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the Share Exchange will include the assets and liabilities of the Company and eWellness, and the historical operations of eWellness and operations of the Combined Company from the closing date of the Share Exchange.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements have been prepared to reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of eWellness Healthcare Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary eWellness Corporation. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Financial Statement Reclassification

Certain account balances from prior periods have been reclassified in these audited consolidated financial statements so as to conform to current period classifications.

Loss Per Share

Basic loss per common share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus the assumed exercise of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock or “as converted” method, as appropriate. During periods of net loss, all common stock equivalents are excluded from the diluted EPS calculation because they are antidilutive.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these good faith estimates and judgments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at historical cost. Minor additions and renewals are expensed in the year incurred. Major additions and renewals are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. The Company uses other depreciation methods (generally accelerated) for tax purposes where appropriate. The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows:

Furniture and Fixtures5 - 7 Years
Computer Equipment5 - 7 Years
Software3 Years

The Company regularly evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. If factors indicate the asset may not be recoverable, we compare the related undiscounted future net cash flows to the carrying value of the asset to determine if impairment exists. If the expected future net cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized based on the fair value of the asset. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there was no impairment recognized.

Intangible Assets

The Company accounts for assets that are not physical in nature as intangible assets. Intangible assets have either an identifiable or indefinite useful life. Intangible assets with identifiable useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their economic or legal life, whichever is shorter. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are reassessed each year for impairment. If an impairment has occurred, then a loss is recognized. An impairment loss is determined by subtracting the asset’s fair value from the asset’s book/carrying value.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10-30. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Accounting standards require the consideration of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if it is “more likely than not” that some component or all of the benefits of deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Recent Pronouncements

Adoption of ASU 2014-10 Development Stage Entities

In June 2014, the FASBissued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2014-10Development Stage Entities. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 remove the definition of a development stage entity from Topic 915Development Stage Entities, thereby removing the distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from US GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholder’s equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275,Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations. ASU 2014-10 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.

The Company adopted this standard effective June 30, 2014. The Company’s financial statements have been impacted by the adoption of this ASU mainly by the removal of inception-to-date information in the Company’s statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity.

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and accounts payable. The carrying amount of cash and accounts payable approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these items.warrants being exercised through a cashless exercise.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3. Going Concern

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company has no revenues and no operations and had not emerged from the development stage. The Company has an accumulated loss of $1,901,279. In view of these matters, there is substantive doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue operations is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations, of which there can be no guarantee. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of computer equipment at a stated cost of $4,214 and $4,214 less accumulated depreciation of $983 and $140 for the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Depreciation expense was $843 and $140 for the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Note 5. Intangible Assets

The Company recognized the cost of a software license and a license for use of a programming code as intangible assets. The stated cost of these assets were $24,770 and $0 less accumulated amortization of $1,954 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Note 6. Income Taxes

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Net deferred tax liabilities consist of the following components as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

  2014  2013 
       
Deferred tax assets:        
NOL Carryover $314,000  $15,067 
Deferred Rent  2,300   - 
Accrued Payroll  115,200   - 
Contingent Liability  31,500   - 
Deferred tax liabilities        
Depreciation  (300)  - 
Valuation allowance  (462,700)  (15,067)
Net deferred tax asset $-  $- 

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 due to the following:

  2014  2013 
       
Book Income $(468,900) $(158,656)
Depreciation  (300)  - 
Contributed Services      143,820 
Non-Deductible Expenses  -   709 
Meals & Entertainment  2,500   - 
Stock for Expense Accounts  21,000   - 
Contributed Interest Expense  900   - 
Gain/Loss on settlement of debt through equity  (400)  - 
Deferred Rent  -   - 
Accrued Payroll  115,200   - 
Related Party Interest  -   - 
Contingent Liability  31,500   - 
Valuation allowance  298,500   14,127 
  $-  $- 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

At December 31, 2014, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $897,000 that may be offset against future taxable income from the year 2015 through 2034. No tax benefit has been reported in the December 31, 2014 consolidated financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in future years.

The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not recognize any interest or penalties, nor did we have any interest or penalties accrued as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 related to unrecognized benefits.

The Company has filed for an extension of the federal income tax return in the U.S for the year ended December 31, 2014. The tax years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 are open for examination for federal income tax purposes and by other major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

Note 7. Related Party Transactions

Through the year ended December 31, 2014, a related party, a company in which the former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO of the Company is also serving as CFO, has paid $67,710 on behalf of the Company. The amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $56,155 and $0, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, the Company recorded $2,708 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party based on an interest rateissued a total of 8%.

31,419,215 shares of common stock because of debt conversion. The total debt conversion was $191,731.

During the period ending December 31, 2014, the Company entered into a license agreement with a programming company in which one of our directors is Chief Marketing Officer. Through the licensing agreement, we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000. The license fee is recorded as an Intangible Asset and Accounts Payable on the Balance Sheet.

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The imputed rent expense of $500 per month is recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

Through the year ended December 31, 2014, the officers of the Company incur personal expenses on behalf of the Company. The amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $30,181 and $0 respectively. In addition, advances were made to officers. The amounts due from officers as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $7,054 and $0, respectively.

The Company periodically incurs expenses for research and development with a related party. At the periods ending December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had recorded expenses of $30 and $2,706, respectively.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8. Convertible Notes

On December 23, 20142016, the Company issued $213,337 convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase935,000 shares of common stock to four individual investors.for consulting services. The overall termsweighted average price of the Notes are as follows:

Interest rate: 12% per annum.
Due date: December 31, 2015.these shares was $1.44. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due date.
Redemption right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $1.50 for 20 consecutive trading days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Notes, following written notice to the holders of the Notes.
Optional Conversion: At the option of the holders, the Notes may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.35 per share.
Additionally, if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holders have the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or to convert all or any portion of the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock.
The conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.
The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder.
Warrants: The holders of the Notes are granted the right through December 31, 2015 to purchase 609,534 additional shares of common stock at $.35 per share.
During the time that any portion of these Notes are outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holders at its option have the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to elect to convert the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed above.
The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note:

  December 31, 2014 
Principal amount $213,337 
Unamortized debt discount  (34,904)
Net carrying amount $178,433 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company valued the warrants as the difference in the value of the Note at its stated interest rate of 12% and the fair value of the Note at its discounted value using an expected borrowing rate of 18%.

For the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a debt discount of $34,904 associated with the value of the warrants whichshares is being amortized over the life of the notes. At December 31, 2014, none of the debt had been converted and no warrantscontracts ranging from six to purchase common stock had been exercised.

Under the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the common shares of the Company, pending being listed on the OTC, and the net settlement requirements of the warrants will be analyzed at the end of each quarter to determine if the conversion does become readily convertible to cash which would require derivative accounting calculations and recording.

Note 9. Preferred and Common Stock

Preferred Stock

twelve months.

The total number of shares of preferred stock which the Company shallsecurities issued have authority to issue is 10,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001. There havenot been no preferred shares issued as of the year ended December 31, 2014.

Common Stock

The total number of shares of common stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 100,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001.

As of the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company has 16,421,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held at all stockholders’ meetings for all purposes including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

No holder of shares of stock of any class is entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for or purchase or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class or of securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of dividend.

Note 10. Commitments, Contingencies

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation Cregistered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and may not be offered or sold in the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10%United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.

The Registrant's issuance of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 andabove restricted securities was in reliance upon the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file aexemption from registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of4(2) and Regulation S promulgated by the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgatedSEC under the Securities Act.

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust accountshall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As disclosed therein, we filed the amendments to the initial Form 8-K in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to the Company’s potential violation of Rule 419. The Company continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, but was unable to satisfy the SEC’s concerns. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

As a result of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. As a result of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure tostrictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption.In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

MHI Agreement: On May 24, 2013, eWellness entered into an exclusive 25-year Supply and Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Millennium Healthcare, Inc. (“MHI”) for the following 14 states that include: Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. Under the agreement, eWellness agrees to provide its eWellness Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”) to MHI affiliated physicians within the terms of the Agreement. MHI agreed to market the eWellness DMpt and agreed to use its best efforts to promote and use the DMpt program; MHI also agreed to assist in managing the insurance reimbursement to eWellness for PT evaluations, re-evaluations and physical tests that eWellness staff perform at selected MHI facilities; however, we will be responsible for seeking reimbursement opportunities from insurance providers who do not currently reimburse for our telemedicine services. MHI, through its wholly owned operating subsidiaries, provide primary care physician practices, physician groups and healthcare facilities of all sizes with cutting edge medical devices focused primarily on preventive care through early detection. MHI currently provides their services to 70 medical group offices in NYC and approximately 130 in Northern New Jersey. There are approximately 400 individual physicians in these various practices. Approximately 20 percent of those patient visits are reoccurring visits.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MHI will charge eWellness a 20% billing fee on all insurance reimbursement or patient fees for marketing the DMpt Program and assisting in the processing of insurance reimbursement. We have also agreed that for every $100,000.00 of insurance reimbursement received from MHI patients for our DMpt program (up to $1 million in billing), we will issue 110,000 shares of our common stock to MHI, up to a maximum amount of 1.1 million shares. As of the date of this Report, we have not issued any shares to MHI under this Agreement because we have not yet required or utilized MHI’s reimbursement services, nor has MHI marketed our services.

Each party has the right to terminate the agreement upon breach of the Agreement or dissolution of either party. We may also terminate the Agreement if MHI is, for a period of 60 continuous days, restrained or prevented from transacting a substantial part of their business by reason of a judgment order or regulation of any court or authority; MHI may terminate the Agreement at any time with 30 days written notice. The parties may also terminate the Agreement if either becomes the subject to any bankruptcy or similar proceeding. The Agreement also includes standard indemnification provisions for both parties.

Programming Agreement: On or about June 23, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Bistromatics Corp., to which one of our directors, Curtis Hollister, is Chief Marketing Officer, pursuant to which we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000; $2,000 of which was due upon execution, $5,000 of which is due on August 1, 2014 and the $13,000 balance is due by September 15, 2014. The parties entered into an addendum extending the due date of the $20,000 license fee to December 31, 2014 and another addendum extending it to July 1, 2015. Intellectual property developed as a result of this license, will be our property; but Bistromatics will retain the intellectual property for the original code base. We may resell or license the resulting telemedicine platform for an extended license fee of $10,000 for each additional instance the code base will be used. Through this agreement, Bistromatics Corp. built our PHZIO.com platform; Mr. Hollister purchased the domain name on behalf of the Company and retains no rights to same.

Office Space: The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from Evolution Physical Therapy (“Evolution”), a company owned by our CEO, Mr. Fogt. Evolution has agreed to cancel and contribute the annual rent for the year ended December 31, 2013 towards founding eWellness and its operations; the market value of such rent is $500 per month. During the period ended December 31, 2014, we have recorded this rent payment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital on the Balance Sheet.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11. Subsequent Events

On January 24, 2015, the Company received $20,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum.

On January 24, 2015 the Company extended a previous consulting and service agreement with a consultant from April 21, 2015 to October 20, 2015 for which the Company shall issue 400,000 shares of restricted common stock and 400,000 callable common stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share. As of the date of this report the 400,000 shares have not been issued.

On February 14, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with BMT, Inc. as a consultant and advisor in connection with certain business development advisory. This agreement is on an at-will basis as determined by the company in exchange for cash compensation to be invoiced monthly. The total compensation paid to date on this agreement is $11,950.

On February 23, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters in exchange for 60,000 shares of restricted common stock. As of the date of this report, the 60,000 shares have not been issued.

On March 16, 2015, the Company extended a $20,000 licensing fee payment agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. pertaining to intellectual property utilized by the company until July 1, 2015. The Company made an initial payment of $5,000 with the remaining fees to be to be paid on or before July 1, 2015.

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, to be paid by the Registrant in connection with the issuance and distribution of the common stock being registered. All amounts other than the SEC registration fee are estimates.

SEC Registration Fee $

52.88

 
Legal Fees and Expenses $0* 
Accounting Fees and Expenses $4,700.00* 
Total $

4,752.88*

 

*Estimated as permitted under Rule 511 of Regulation S-K

ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Article VI of our Bylaws provides that each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be a party to or is involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (“proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she or a person for whom he or she is the legal representative is or was one of our directors or officers, employees or agents or is or was serving at our request as a director or officer, employee or agent of another corporation, or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent, shall be indemnified and held harmless to the fullest extent authorized by the Nevada Revised Statutes. Such right includes the right to be paid by the Company for expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition; provided, however, that the payment of such expenses in advance of the final disposition of such proceeding, shall be made only upon delivery of an undertaking, by or on behalf of such director or officer, to repay all amounts so advanced if it should be determined ultimately that such officer or director is not entitled to be indemnified under our the laws.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the registrant, pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the Registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.

ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

During the past three years, we effected the following transactions in reliance upon exemptions from registration under the Securities Act as amended. Unless stated otherwise: (i) thatthe securities were offered and sold only to accredited investors; (ii) there was no general solicitation or general advertising related to the offerings; (iii) each of the persons who received these unregistered securities had knowledge and experience in financial and business matters which allowed them to evaluate the merits and risk of the receipt of these securities, and that they were knowledgeable about our operations and financial condition; (ii)(iv) no underwriter participated in, nor did we pay any commissions or fees to any underwriter in connection with the transactions; (iii) the transactions did not involve a public offerings; and, (iv)(v) each certificate issued for these unregistered securities contained a legend stating that the securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and setting forth the restrictions on the transferability and the sale of the securities.

Page 76


On April 7, 2011, we issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement. The shares were valued at $10,000.Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

On April 30, 2014, we issued 9,200,000 shares pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement.

On May 9, 2014, we issued an aggregate of 403,000 shares of our common stock: 400,000 of which were issued pursuant to a consulting agreement with a value of $40,000 and 3,000 of which were issued pursuant to a verbal agreement Management as compensation for website services provided to the Company, with a value of $1,500.

On October 16, 2014, we issued an aggregate of 618,000 shares of our common stock to two consultants pursuant to consulting agreements with such persons. The shares were valued at $61,800.

On October 16, 2014, per Board approval, we issued an aggregate of 200,000 shares of our common stock to one of our directors for his director services. The shares were valued at $2,000.

On December 23, 2014, we issued $213,337 Series A Senior Convertible Redeemable Notes (the “Notes”) that are initially convertible into 609,532 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 609,532 shares of our common stock, pursuant to a private financing.

On January 24, 2015, we extended the term of an outstanding consulting and service agreement, pursuant to which the Company shall issue 400,000 shares of restricted common stock and 400,000 callable common stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share.

On February 23, 2015, we entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters in exchange for 60,000 shares of restricted common stock.

On April 9, 2015, we issued $270,080.11 Notes (including an aggregate of $123,980.11 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) that are initially convertible into 771,657 shares of our common stock, pursuant to a private financing.

Except as otherwise noted, all of the transactions listed above were made pursuant to the exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for sales not involving a public offering or Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC. The securities issued have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.

ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

EXHIBITS

(a) The following exhibitsdocuments are filed as part ofexhibits to this registration statement:

report on Form 8-K or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated by reference is identified by a parenthetical reference to the SEC filing that included such document.

Exhibit Number

No.
 

Description:

Description
3.1 

Amended & Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-18-K/A filed on May 15, 2012.)

August 6, 2014)
3.2 Bylaws of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on May 15, 2012.)
3.3Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on August 30, 2012.)
3.4Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 29, 2014.)2012)
5.1 Opinion of Hunter Taubman Fischer, LLC (Filed Herewith)Thomas J. Craft, Jr., Esq., filed herewith.
10.1

Extension of Consulting and Services Agreement with Rodney Schoemann dated as of January 24, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on May 27, 2015)

10.2 Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 23, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.2Form of 12% Senior Convertible Promissory Note (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.3 Form of 12% Senior Convertible Promissory NoteSeries A Warrant Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.4 Form of Series A WarrantRegistration Rights Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.5 Form of Registration RightsSecurity Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.6 Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2015)
10.7

Medical Advisory Agreement with Akash Bajaj M.D., M.P.H. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Securitythe Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2015)

10.8

Advisory Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2016)

10.9Securities Settlement Agreement with EWLL Acquisition Partners, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 18, 2016)
10.10New Note Form with JEB Partners, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 18, 2016)
10.11Services Agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2016)
10.12Rodney Schoemann Non-Convertible Note Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2016)
10.13JEB Partners L.P. Convertible Note Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)11, 2017)
10.710.14 2015 Stock Option Plan (IncorporatedDebt Conversion and Subscription Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2015)January 11, 2017)
10.15Letter Engagement Agreement with Lyons Capital, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2017)
10.16Definitive Service Agreement dated January 24, 2017with Bistromatics, Inc., (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2017).
10.17Securities Purchase Agreement with JEB Partners L.P.
10.18Securities Purchase Agreement with Crossover Capital Fund II, LLC
10.19Investment Agreement with Tangiers Global LLC
14.1 Code of Ethics Conduct (Incorporated by Referencereference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2014)
21.1Subsidiaries of eWellness: eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation.
23.1

Consent of Hunter, Taubman, Fischer, contained in Exhibit 5.1

23.223 Consent of HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP (FiledIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed herewith.)
23.3Consent of Mantyla McReynolds, LLC (Filed herewith.)
24.1Power of Attorney. (Included on signature page.)

Page 77


Item 17. Undertakings

101.INS +XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH +XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL +XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF +XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB +XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE +XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

+Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on May 27, 2015.

ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS

(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:



(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, pursuant to this Registration Statement, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:



(i) toTo include any prospectusProspectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933.

1933;

(ii) toTo reflect in the prospectusProspectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectusProspectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation"Calculation of Registration Fee”Fee" table in the effective registration statement.



(iii) toTo include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this Registration Statementthe registration statement or any material change to such information in this Registration Statement.

the registration statement;

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new Registration Statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(4) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the Registrant’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(5)

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, each Prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than Prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or Prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or Prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or Prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrantregistrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, described in Item 15 above, or otherwise, the Registrantregistrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrantregistrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrantregistrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrantregistrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

SIGNATURES(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:
The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary Prospectus or Prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 (Section 230.424 of this chapter);
(ii) Any free writing Prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing Prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

Page 78


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirementsrequirement of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Registrantregistrant has duly caused this registration statement on Form S-1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Culver City, State of California, on August 21 , 2015.April 11, 2017.

eWELLNESS HEALTH CORPORATION

EWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
By:/s/ Darwin Fogt
Name:Darwin Fogt
Title:CEO

By: /s/ Darwin Fogt
Darwin Fogt
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEYBy: /s/ David Markowski

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes
David Markowski
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and appoints Darwin Fogt and Douglas MacLellan, or either of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 and any documents related to this report and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

TitleDate
/s/ SignatureDouglas MacLellan

Chairman of the BoardApril 11, 2017
Douglas MacLellan 

Title

Date

    

/s/ Darwin Fogt

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) and DirectorApril 11, 2017
Darwin Fogt 

August 21 , 2015

     

/s/ David Markowski

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) and DirectorApril 11, 2017
David Markowski August 21 , 2015
    
/s/ Curtis HollisterChief Technology Officer and DirectorApril 11, 2017
Curtis Hollister  

/s/ Douglas MacLellan

Director

August 21 , 2015
   

/s/ Douglas Cole

DirectorAugust 21 , 2015
/s/ Rochelle PleskowDirectorAugust 21, 2015