As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 12, 2002October 15, 2004
Registration No. 333-                    


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form S-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


Westamerica Bancorporation

(Exact name of registrantRegistrant as specified in its charter)
     
California 6021 94-2156203
(State or other jurisdiction of
of incorporation or organization)
 (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)


1108 Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, California 94901 (415) 257-8000

(Address, including ZIPzip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant’sRegistrant’s principal executive offices)


David L. Payne

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Westamerica Bancorporation
1108 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901
(415) 257-8000
(Name, address, including ZIPzip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)


Copies of communications to:
   
Thomas G. Reddy
Alison C. Wauk
Bingham McCutchen LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 393-2000
Fax (415) 393-2286
 Rodney R. Brent Faye
McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen,Peck
Patricia F. Young
Pillsbury Winthrop LLP
Nixon Peabody LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
Two Embarcadero Center

50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, California 94111
San Francisco, California 94611
415-393-2000
415-984-8365CA 94103
(415) 983-1000
Fax (415) 983-1200


    Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the securities to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomeRegistration Statement becomes effective.

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.    o

         If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

         If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE



ProposedProposed
AmountMaximumMaximum
Title of each Class ofto BeOffering PriceAggregateAmount of
Securities to Be RegisteredRegisteredPer Share(2)Offering Price(2)Registration Fee

Common Stock, no par value(1)420,000 shares$1,445.84


         


Proposed MaximumProposed MaximumAmount of
Title of Each Class ofAmount toOffering PriceAggregate OfferingRegistration
Securities to Be RegisteredBe Registered(1)Per Unit(1)Price(1), (2)Fee(2)

Common Stock, no par value (and associated stock purchase rights)(3) 2,094,950 Not applicable $95,142,754 $12,054.59


(1) Including associatedRepresents the estimated maximum number of shares of common stock purchase rights under shareholder rights plan.of the Registrant to be issued upon consummation of the merger of Redwood Empire Bancorp with and into Registrant, based on (i) 4,952,123 shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock outstanding, plus 343,685 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options to acquire Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock and (ii) a maximum exchange ratio of 0.3792 shares of Registrant’s common stock for each share of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock.
 
(2) InPursuant to Rule 457(f), the registration fee was computed on the basis of $28.71, the market value of the common stock of Redwood Empire to be exchanged in the merger, computed in accordance with Rule 457(f)(1),457(c) on the basis of the average of the high and low price per share of such stock as quoted on The Nasdaq National Market on October 11, 2004, and 5,295,808 shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp which may be received by the Registrant and canceled upon consummation of the merger. In calculating the filing fee the anticipated amount usedof $56,899,893 in cash consideration to determinebe paid by the proposed maximum aggregate offering price andRegistrant to Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders who exchange their Redwood Empire Bancorp shares in the registration feemerger has been based ondeducted from the last reported sale price of shares of Common Stock, no par value of Kerman State Bank asthe securities to be received by the Registrant in exchange.
(3) Prior to the occurrence of April 11, 2002.certain events, the stock purchase rights will not be evidenced separately from the common stock.


         The registrantRegistrant hereby amends this registration statementRegistration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrantRegistrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statementRegistration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statementRegistration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.




DRAFT DATED APRIL 12, 2002 SUBJECT TO CHANGECOMPLETION, DATED                   , 2004
   
Prospectus of
 Proxy Statement of
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION
REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP
1108 Fifth Avenue
111 Santa Rosa Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
 KERMAN STATE BANK
306 South Madera Avenue
Kerman,Santa Rosa, California 9363095404

    This document is being furnished to the shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp to be used in voting at a special meeting of shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp to be held on [meeting date], 2002.2004. This document is first being mailed to holders of common stock of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp on or about [mailing date], 2002.2004.

    The meeting has been called to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of FebruaryAugust 25, 2002,2004 among Redwood Empire Bancorp, its wholly-owned subsidiary National Bank of the related merger agreementRedwoods, Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bancorporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary Westamerica Bank, and the transactions contemplated by the agreements between Kerman State Bank, Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica’s wholly owned subsidiary Westamerica Bank,thereby, and to act upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

    If the merger is completed, Kerman State Bank shareholderseach share of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock will be converted into the right to receive approximately 0.2731$28.74, consisting of $11.49 in cash and $17.25 in shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, valued at its average closing price for eachthe 20-trading day period ending three business days before the effective date of the merger. The merger consideration may be reduced by up to $0.30 per share (allocated proportionately between cash and stock) if regulatory agencies require Westamerica to divest deposits in Lake County as a condition of Kerman State Bank common stock they hold, subject to certain possible adjustments as described inapproving the merger agreement.merger. Westamerica Bancorporation common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “WABC.” The value of the stock portion will increase if the average closing price of Westamerica common stock over the measurement period ending three business days before completion of the merger is greater than $55.6050 and will decrease if the average closing price during that period is less than $45.4950. On [                  ], 2002,2004, the last reported sale price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock closed atwas [$         ] per share. Based on that closing price, and assuming no adjustments,divestments, you would receive                    shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock and $11.49 in cash for each share of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock (subject to reduction as described above if Westamerica common stock with a value of [$                    ].is required to divest deposits). This prospectus covers a maximum of 420,0002,094,450 shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock that may be issued to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders in the merger. The specific details of the merger agreement are more fully discussed under the heading “The merger”Merger” in this document, and in the merger agreement which is in Appendixattached as Annex A to this document.You should also review and consider the matters described under the heading “Risk factors” on page 916 in determining whether to approve the merger.

    TheApproval of the merger requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stockstock. You should be aware that Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders holding approximately 49.6% of the outstanding shares have agreed to vote in favor of the merger and have given Westamerica irrevocable proxies to vote their shares in favor of the merger and that directors of Redwood Empire, who in the aggregate own approximately 1.0% of the outstanding shares, have also agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger. Therefore, shareholder approval of the merger is required to approveeffectively assured. The merger does not require the merger.approval of the Westamerica Bancorporation shareholders.

    Neither this transaction nor the securities of Westamerica Bancorporation have been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state securities commission, nor has the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state securities commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this document. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

    YouThe shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock offered by the accompanying document are not savings accounts, deposits or other obligations of Westamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire Bancorp or any subsidiary of any of the parties and are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency. The shares are subject to investment risk.

The information in this document is not complete and may also want to reviewbe changed. We may not issue these securities until the documents listed under “Where you can find more information” on page 68.

The date of this proxy statement/prospectusregistration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is , 2002.effective.

    This document incorporates important business and financial information about Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp that is not included in or delivered with this document. That information is available from Westamerica without charge, excluding all exhibits unless specifically incorporated by reference in this document, by requesting them in writing or by telephone from Westamerica Bancorporation, Kris Irvine, Assistant Corporate Secretary, 4550 Mangels Boulevard, Fairfield, California 94585, (707) 863-6826. from:

Westamerica Bancorporation,
Redwood Empire Bancorp
Kris Irvine, Assistant Corporate Secretary,
Marta Idica, Corporate Secretary
4550 Mangels Boulevard,
111 Santa Rosa Avenue
Fairfield, California 94585
Santa Rosa, California 95404-4905
(707) 863-6826
(707) 573-4800

If you would like to request documents, from Westamerica, please do so by                   , 2002,2004, to receive them before the meeting.

In deciding how to vote on the merger, you should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. Neither Westamerica Bancorporation nor Redwood Empire Bancorp has authorized any person to provide you with any information that is different from what is contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus. This proxy statement/ prospectus is dated                   , 2004. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus is accurate as of any date other than such date, and neither the mailing to you of this proxy statement/ prospectus nor the issuance to you of shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock will create any implication to the contrary. This proxy statement/ prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy in any jurisdiction in which, or to any person to whom, it is unlawful.

    The date of this document is                   , 2004 and it is first being mailed to shareholders of Redwood Empire Bancorp on or about                   , 2004.


KERMAN STATE BANKREDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP

306 South Madera111 Santa Rosa Avenue
Kerman,Santa Rosa, California 9363095404
(559) 846-5321(707) 573-4800

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSNotice of Special Meeting of Shareholders of Redwood Empire Bancorp

 
Time[meeting time] on [meeting date], 20022004
 
PlaceKerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp
306 South Madera111 Santa Rosa Avenue
Kerman,Santa Rosa, California 9363095404
 
Items of business(1) To approve the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “merger agreement”) dated as of FebruaryAugust 25, 2002,2004, among Redwood Empire Bancorp, National Bank of the related agreement of merger,Redwoods, Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement among Kerman State Bank, Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank;agreement; and
 
(2) To consider such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
 
Record dateYou are entitled to vote if you were a shareholder at the close of business on April 15, 2002.[record date], 2004.
 
Voting by proxyPlease submit a proxy by mail as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. For specific instructions, please refer to the Questions and Answers beginning on page 1 of this proxy statement and the instructions on the proxy card.

     In connection with the proposed merger, shareholders will be given the opportunity to exercise dissenters’ rights in accordance with certain procedures specified in the California General Corporation Law, Sections 1300-1304, which sections are attached hereto as Annex C and incorporated in this proxy statement/ prospectus by reference. These rights will be made available if demands are made for payment with respect to 5% or more of the outstanding shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock. If dissenters’ rights are made available and if shareholders follow all of the procedures required by law, shareholders may receive cash in the amount equal to the fair market value, as determined by Redwood Empire Bancorp, or, if required, by a court of law, of their shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock as of August 25, 2004, the business day immediately preceding the announcement of the merger. For additional details about dissenters’ rights, please refer to “The Merger — Dissenters’ rights of appraisal” and Annex C in the accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus.

 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 
Marta J. Idica,Corporate Secretary


TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
SUMMARY
Kerman State Bank shareholders will receive approximately 0.2731 of a share of Westamerica common stock in the merger, but this ratio is subject to adjustment (page 25)
Comparative market price data
The merger is intended to be a tax-free transaction in which Kerman State Bank shareholders will not recognize gain or loss (page 21)
Financial advisor gives opinion that consideration is fair to Kerman State Bank shareholders (page 14)
Kerman State Bank’s board recommends shareholder approval (page 13)
Shareholders of Westamerica and Kerman State Bank have different rights (page 65)
Dissenters’ rights of appraisal (page 22 and Appendix C)
Benefits to certain officers and directors in the merger (page 20)
Information regarding Westamerica and Kerman State Bank (pages 33 and 42)
Special shareholders meeting to be held on [meeting date], 2002 (page 10)
Record date set at April 15, 2002; vote required for approval of merger (page 11)
Conditions that must be satisfied for the merger to occur (page 30)
Regulatory approvals we must obtain for the merger to occur (page 19)
Westamerica to use purchase accounting treatment (page 21)
Termination of the merger agreement (page 32)
Selected Financial Information about Westamerica
Selected Financial Information about Kerman State Bank
Comparative per common share data
RISK FACTORS
INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
SPECIAL MEETING OF KERMAN STATE BANK SHAREHOLDERS
Date, time and place of meeting
The meeting
The board of directors of recommends a vote for the merger
Record date and voting rights
Vote required
Voting by proxy
Revocability of proxies
Adjournments
Solicitation of proxies
Other matters
PROPOSAL ONE -- THE MERGER
General
Background of the merger
Reasons for the merger; recommendation of Kerman State Bank’s board of directors
Opinion of Kerman State Bank’s financial advisor
Regulatory approvals required
Nasdaq listing
Interests of certain officers and directors in the merger
Accounting treatment
Certain federal income tax consequences
Dissenters’ rights of appraisal
Resales of Westamerica common stock
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
Structure of the merger; effective time
Conversion of Kerman State Bank common stock
Options
Exchange agent; exchange procedure
Representations and warranties
Conduct of business pending the merger
Conditions to completion of the merger
Extension; waiver
Termination
Expenses; liquidated damages
Amendment
OPERATIONS FOLLOWING THE MERGER
INFORMATION ABOUT WESTAMERICA
General
Certain additional business risks
Employees
Branch offices and facilities
The effect of government policy on banking
Regulation and supervision of bank holding companies
Bank supervision and regulation
Capital standards
Prompt corrective action and other enforcement mechanisms
Safety and soundness standards
Restrictions on dividends and other distributions
Premiums for deposit insurance and assessments for examinations
CRA and fair lending developments
Financial privacy legislation
Recently enacted legislation and regulations
Pending legislation and regulations
INFORMATION ABOUT KERMAN STATE BANK
General
Supervision and regulation
Capital adequacy requirements
Activities of subsidiaries of state non-member banks
Privacy
Safeguarding confidential customer information
CRA sunshine requirements
USA Patriot Act
Consumer protection laws and regulations
Other legislation
Other information
Premises
Legal Proceedings
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF KERMAN STATE BANK
Provision for loan losses
Summary of loan loss experience
Nonperforming assets
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Market quotations
Dividends and dividend policy
Shareholdings of management
DESCRIPTION OF WESTAMERICA CAPITAL STOCK
Common stock
Preferred stock and Class B common stock
Debt agreement
Automatic dividend reinvestment service and employee stock purchase plan
DESCRIPTION OF KERMAN STATE BANK COMMON STOCK
General
Common Stock
Voting rights
Preemptive rights
Liquidation rights
Provisions of Articles of Incorporation
CERTAIN DIFFERENCES IN RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
General
Declaration of dividends
Cumulative voting
Classified board of directors
Dissenters’ rights in mergers and other reorganizations
Shareholders rights plan
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
OTHER MATTERS
EXPERTS
LEGAL MATTERS
INFORMATION CONCERNING WESTAMERICA MANAGEMENT
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
KERMAN STATE BANK
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT and FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2001 and 2000
Contents
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
KERMAN STATE BANK BALANCE SHEETS
KERMAN STATE BANK STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
KERMAN STATE BANK STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
KERMAN STATE BANK STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
KERMAN STATE BANK NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 22. Undertakings.
SIGNATURES
FORM S-4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 8
Exhibit 23(a)
Exhibit 23(b)
Exhibit 99
It is very important that every shareholder vote. Adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock of Redwood Empire Bancorp issued and outstanding on the record date. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person, please complete, date, sign and return the enclosed white proxy card in the enclosed white envelope to                     . No postage is required if mailed in the United States. If you attend the special meeting, you may vote in person if you wish, even if you have previously returned your proxy card. The proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

      
Page(s)

  1 
  2 
 Kerman State Bank  2 
   23 
 3
Financial advisor gives opinion that consideration is fair to Kerman State Bank shareholders (page 14)3
Kerman State Bank’s board recommends shareholder approval (page 13)3
Shareholderson the stock portion of Westamerica and Kerman State Bank have different rights (page 65)3
Dissenters’ rights of appraisal (page 22 and Appendix C)3
Benefits to certain officers and directors in the merger (page 20)consideration  4 
 Information regarding Westamerica and Kerman State Bank (pages 33 and 42)  4 
 4
4
4
5
5
5
  46 
   46 
   56 
 5
Westamerica to use purchase accounting treatment (page 21)5
Termination of the merger agreement (page 32)5
Selected Financial Information about Westamerica  6 
 Selected Financial Information about Kerman State Bank  76 
 Comparative per common share data6
  8 
Risk Factors9
9
Special Meeting of Kerman State Bank Shareholdersabout Redwood Empire Bancorp  10 
 Date, time and place of meeting10
The meeting10
The board of directors of recommends a vote for the merger10
Record date and voting rights11
Vote required11
Voting by proxy11
Revocability of proxies11
Adjournments11
Solicitation of proxies11
Other matters11
Proposal One — The Merger  12 
 General  1215
16
17
18 
 Background  1218 
 Reasons for the merger; recommendation of Kerman State Bank’s board of directors  1318 
 Opinion  1418 
 Regulatory approvals required  19 
19
19
19
19
20
20
21
22
22
23
25
25
34

i


      
Page(s)

 20
Interests of certain officers and directors in the merger20
Accounting treatment21
Certain federal income tax consequences21
Dissenters’ rights of appraisal22
Resales of Westamerica common stock24
The Merger Agreement24
Structure of the merger; effective time24
Conversion of Kerman State Bank common stock25
Options27
Exchange agent; exchange procedure28
Representations and warranties28
Conduct of business pending the merger29
Conditions to completion of the merger30
Extension; waiver31
Termination32
Expenses; liquidated damages32
Amendment33
Operations Following the Merger33
Information about Westamerica33
General33
Certain additional business risks34
Employees  35 
 Branch offices  35 
 The effect of government policy on banking35
Regulation and supervision of bank holding companies35
Bank supervision and regulation  38 
 Capital standards  38 
 Prompt corrective action and other enforcement mechanisms39
Safety and soundness standards  40 
 43
43
43
44
47
48
48
49
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
54
55
55
56
56
58
59
59
60
  4061 
   4161 
   4161 
   4161
62
62 
 Recently enacted legislation and regulations  42 
   4263 
  4264 
   4264
65 
 Supervision and regulation  4465 
 Capital adequacy requirements  4465
67 
 Activities of subsidiaries of state non-member banks  4567 
 Privacy  4567 
 Safeguarding confidential customer information  4667 
 CRA sunshine requirements  4668 

ii


      
Page(s)

USA Patriot Act46
Consumer protection laws and regulations46
Other legislation47
Other information47
Premises47
Legal Proceedings47
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Kerman State Bank48
Market Price and Dividend Information61
Market quotations61
Dividends and dividend policy61
Shareholdings of management62
63
Common stock63
Preferred stock and Class B common stock63
Debt agreement63
Automatic dividend reinvestment service and employee stock purchase plan64
Description of Kerman State Bank Common Stock64
General64
Common Stock64
Voting rights64
Preemptive rights65
Liquidation rights65
Provisions of Articles of Incorporation65
Certain Differences in Rights of Shareholders65
General65
Declaration of dividends65
Cumulative voting65
Classified board of directors66
Dissenters’ rights in mergers and other reorganizations66
Shareholders rights plan66
Independent Public Accountants67
Other Matters67
Experts67
Legal Matters  68 
Information Concerning Westamerica Management  68 
Where You Can Find Additional Information  68 
Kerman State Bank financial statements  F-168 
Appendix68
69
69
69
69
69
70
70
70
71
77
77
77
77
77
77
78
78
  A-1 
Appendix  B-1 
Appendix  C-1 
EXHIBIT 5
EXHIBIT 23.(A)
EXHIBIT 23.(B)
Exhibit 99(a)

iii


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER

Q:What will happen to Kerman StateRedwood Empire Bancorp and National Bank of the Redwoods in this merger?

A:ImmediatelyRedwood Empire Bancorp will merge with Westamerica Bancorporation, with Westamerica Bancorporation as the surviving corporation. Promptly after that National Bank of the merger, Kerman State BankRedwoods will merge with Westamerica Bank. The resulting bank will continue under the name “Westamerica Bank” as a wholly owned subsidiary of Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation. The existing branches of Kerman StateNational Bank of the Redwoods willeitherbecome or be consolidated with branches of Westamerica Bank.

Q:How do I vote?

A:Simply indicate on your proxy card how you want to vote and then sign and mail your proxy card in the enclosed return envelope as soon as possible so that your shares may be represented at the Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp special meeting.

Q:If my shares are held in “street name” by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?

A:Your broker will not vote your shares for you unless you provide instructions to your broker on how to vote. It is important therefore that you follow the directions provided by your broker regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your shares. If you fail to instruct your broker how to vote your shares, the effect will be the same as a vote against the merger agreement.

Q:Can I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy card?

A:Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the Special Meeting.special meeting. If your shares are held in your name you may do this in one of three ways. First, you may send a written notice stating that you would like to revoke your proxy. Second, you may complete and submit a new proxy card. If you choose either of these two methods, youRedwood Empire Bancorp must submitreceive your notice of revocation or your new proxy card to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp at the address at the top of the Notice of Special Meeting in time so as to receive it prior to the vote at the special meeting. Third, you may attendrevoke your proxy before it is exercised by attending the special meeting and vote in person if you tell the Secretary that you wantelecting to cancel your proxy and vote in person. Simply attending the Kerman State Bank special meeting, however, will not revoke your proxy. If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must follow directions received from your broker to change your vote or to vote at the Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp special meeting.

Q:Should I send in my certificates now?

A:No. After the merger is completed, we will send you written instructions for exchanging your stock certificates.

Q:When do you expect this merger to be completed?

A:We are working toward completing this merger as quickly as possible. We currently expect, subject to receiving required regulatory approvals, to complete this merger in mid-2002.the fourth quarter of 2004 or the first quarter of 2005.

1


SUMMARY

     This summary, together with the “Questions and Answers” on the preceding pages, highlights important selected information from this proxy statement/prospectus. To understand the merger fully and for a more complete description of the legal terms of the merger, you should read carefully this entire document and the other information available to you. We have included page references in parentheses to direct you to a more complete description of the topics presented in this summary.

Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders will receive approximately 0.2731$28.74, consisting of a share$11.49 in cash and $17.25 in shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock in the merger, but this ratioamount is subject to possible adjustment (page 25)44)

     WhenIf the merger is completed, you will receive approximately 0.2731 of a share of Westamerica common stock for each share of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock that you hold, subjectwill be converted into the right to certain possible adjustments.receive merger consideration of $28.74, consisting of $11.49 in cash and $17.25 in shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, valued at its average closing price for the 20 trading days ending three business days before the effective date of the merger. The merger consideration may be reduced by up to $0.30 per share (allocated proportionately between cash and stock) if bank regulators require Westamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire Bancorp to divest deposits in Lake County as a condition of approving the merger. For example, based on an assumed Westamerica average closing price of $55.25 (the average closing price for the 20 trading days ended October 11, 2004) and a resulting exchange ratio of 0.3122, if you holdheld 100 shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock, you willwould have the right to receive 27.31$1,149 in cash and 31.22 shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock in the merger (assuming no adjustments). You will receive cash instead of fractional shares. Therefore, you would only receive 2731 shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock. You would also receive a check in an amount equal to 0.310.22 of a share multiplied by an average closing price of the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock. Thestock on account of your fractional share, or $12.16 based on an average closing price of $55.25.

The following table shows the effect on the exchange ratio and the value of the merger consideration of changes in the average closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock (rounded to the nearest cent):

               
Value of StockValue of Merger
Westamerica AveragePortion Based onConsideration Based on
Closing Price isExchange RatioAverage Closing PriceAverage Closing Price




$40.4400   0.3792  $15.33  $26.82 
 42.9675   0.3792   16.29   27.78 
 45.4950   0.3792   17.25   28.74 
 48.0225   0.3592   17.25   28.74 
 50.5500   0.3412   17.25   28.74 
 53.0775   0.3250   17.25   28.74 
 55.6050   0.3102   17.25   28.74 
 58.1325   0.3102   18.03   29.52 
 60.6600   0.3102   18.82   30.31 

     The merger agreement may be terminated by the board of directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp if Westamerica’s average closing price is less than $40.44. The merger agreement may be terminated by the board of directors of Westamerica Bancorporation if Westamerica Bancorporation’s average closing price is greater than $60.66.

2


The merger consideration will be determined basedreduced if Westamerica Bancorporation is required to divest deposits in Lake County as a condition of any governmental approval of the merger. Any reduction will be allocated proportionately between the stock portion and the cash portion. The following table shows the effect of deposit divestitures on the value of the merger consideration (assuming no adjustment on account of a change in Westamerica’s average closing pricesprice).

                     
Adjusted Merger Consideration Per Share

If the volume of deposits thatUp toOver $10 MillionOver $20 MillionOver
Westamerica is required toInitial Value$10 Millionto $20 Millionto $30 Million$30 Million
divest in Lake County is:




Stock portion $17.25  $17.19  $17.16  $17.10  $17.07 
Cash portion  11.49   11.45   11.43   11.39   11.37 
Merger consideration  28.74   28.64   28.59   28.49   28.44 

The following table shows the effect on the exchange ratio and the value of the merger consideration of changes in the average closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, assuming a required divestiture of more than $30 million in deposits in Lake County:

               
Value of StockValue of Merger
Westamerica AveragePortion Based onConsideration Based on
Closing Price isExchange RatioAverage Closing PriceAverage Closing Price




$40.4400   0.3752  $15.17  $26.54 
 42.9675   0.3752   16.12   27.49 
 45.4950   0.3752   17.07   28.44 
 48.0225   0.3555   17.07   28.44 
 50.5500   0.3377   17.07   28.44 
 53.0775   0.3216   17.07   28.44 
 55.6050   0.3070   17.07   28.44 
 58.1325   0.3070   17.85   29.22 
 60.6600   0.3070   18.62   29.99 

If Westamerica Bancorporation is required to divest at least $10 million but not more than $30 million in deposits, the reductions in the exchange ratio, value of the stock portion and the total merger consideration would be proportionately less. For additional detail on eachthe effect of the 20 consecutive trading days prior to two business days before the closing date, the datethese possible adjustments, see “The merger agreement — Conversion of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock” on which the transactions relating to the merger are completed.

     The exchange ratio (the number of shares of Westamerica common stock into which each share of Kerman State Bank common stock will be converted at closing) is a function of several factors, including Kerman State Bank’s adjusted equity (as defined in the merger agreement), amount of performing loans and Significant Liabilities (as defined in the merger agreement). The exchange ratio may be reduced if:

• Kerman State Bank’s performing loans before closing are less than $60 million;
• Kerman State Bank’s allowance for loan losses before closing, determined under Westamerica’s methodology, is greater than $3.2 million;
• Kerman State Bank incurs certain obligations defined as Significant Liabilities, which include new unapproved leases and other contractual obligations; capital expenditures above $25,000; contingent liabilities related to hazardous materials; new or accelerated severance or pension obligations; merger-related expenses above $470,000; and certain loan loss provisions and write-downs of foreclosed property; or
• The average closing price for Westamerica common stock over the 20 trading days ending two business days before the closing is greater than $41.76.

     The exchange ratio may be increased if:

• Kerman State Bank’s allowance for loan losses before closing, determined under Westamerica’s methodology, is less than $2.4 million; or
• Westamerica’s average closing price is less than $33.80.

The adjustments that will be made on account of the forgoing factors are interrelated and are described in Section 2.1(a) of the merger agreement.page 44.

Comparative market price dataMarket Price Data

     Westamerica Bancorporation’s common stock is quotedtraded on Nasdaq. Kerman State Bankthe Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “WABC.” Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock is thinly traded inon the over-the-counter market, is quoted inNasdaq National Market under the “Electronic Bulletin Board” and is not quoted on Nasdaq.symbol “REBC.”

     The following table presents historical per share market values for Westamerica Bancorporation common stock and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock and the equivalent pro forma market values (i) on February 22, 2002,August 25, 2004, the last trading day prior to public announcement of the merger and (ii) on [                    , 2002]2004]. The historical

2


values represent the last sale prices on or before the dates indicated. The equivalent pro forma market value of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock is obtained by multiplying the historical market price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock by the applicable exchange ratio. The equivalent pro forma market value per share of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock assumes an average closing price equivalent to the market price for Westamerica Bancorporation common stock shown in the table and an assumed exchange ratio of 0.3122 (the actual exchange ratio will vary) and no adjustments on account of a possible divestiture of deposits.

     The values shown for Westamerica Bancorporation common stock may be higher or lower than the average closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock as that term is defined in the merger agreement. The equivalent pro formaagreement for purposes of determining the exchange ratio and the actual market value per share of Kerman State BankWestamerica Bancorporation common stock reflects an exchange ratio of 0.2731 and assumes an average closing price equivalent to the market price for Westamerica common stock shown in the table.

             
Kerman State Bank
Historical Market Price(1)Equivalent Pro Forma


WestamericaKerman State BankMarket Value



February 22, 2002 $40.69  $5.65  $11.11 
          , 2002 $  $  $ 


(1) The historical market price for Kerman State Bank common stock is based on information provided to management by various sources, but not verified by Kerman State Bank. Kerman State Bank has not been a party to any trades reflected in that information.

Westamerica cannot assure you that the price of its stock will be the same or greater than the prices shown in the table at the time of the merger, or at any time after the completion of the merger. merger, so the market value of Westamerica

3


Bancorporation common stock you receive and therefore the total per share merger consideration you receive upon completion of the merger may be greater or less than the amounts shown.
                 
Redwood Empire Bancorp
Equivalent Pro Forma Market
Historical Market PriceValue


WestamericaRedwoodStock and
BancorporationEmpire BancorpStock PortionCash Portions




August 25, 2004 $54.06  $25.99  $17.25  $28.74 
          , 2004                

Once Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp is acquired by Westamerica Bancorporation, there will be no further public market for Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s common stock. Westamerica Bancorporation common stock will continue to be traded on Nasdaq.the Nasdaq National Market.

The merger is intended to be a tax-free transaction in which Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders will not recognize gain or loss on the stock portion of the merger consideration (page 21)38)

     The merger is intended to be a tax-free reorganization so that no gain or loss will be recognized by either Westamerica Bancorporation or Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp or their respective shareholders for federal income tax purposes except foron the stock portion of the merger consideration. Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders may recognize gain but not loss on the receipt of the cash portion of the merger consideration.

Redwood Empire Bancorp’s board recommends shareholder approval (pages 18, 22)

Redwood Empire Bancorp’s board of directors believes that Kerman State Bankthe merger is in the best interests of Redwood Empire and its shareholders will receive insteadand has unanimously approved the merger agreement. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of fractionalthe merger agreement.

Vote Required (page 19)

     Approval of the merger by Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. The directors and executive officers of Redwood Empire Bancorp and their affiliates together held approximately 1.0% of Redwood Empire’s outstanding common stock as of the record date. You should be aware that Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders holding approximately 49.6% of the outstanding shares or cash received by Kerman State Bankhave agreed to vote in favor of the merger and have given Westamerica Bancorporation irrevocable proxies to vote their shares in favor of the merger and that directors of Redwood Empire, who in the aggregate own approximately 1.0% of the outstanding shares, have also agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger. Therefore shareholder approval of the merger is effectively assured.

The merger does not require the approval of the shareholders who perfect their dissenter’s rights.of Westamerica Bancorporation.

Financial advisor giveshas given an opinion that consideration is fair to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders (page 14)25)

     In deciding to approve the merger, the Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp board of directors considered the opinion of its financial advisor, James H. Avery Company,Hovde Financial LLC, dated as of February 5, 2002,August 13, 2004, about the fairness of the merger to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders from a financial point of view. This opinion is attached as AppendixAnnex B to this proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read it carefully. Under an agreement with Kerman State Bank, James H. Avery CompanyRedwood Empire Bancorp, Hovde Financial LLC will receive a fee of approximately $237,000,$1,530,000, subject to adjustment depending on the actual value of the merger consideration as of closing, when the merger closes.

Kerman State Bank’s board recommends shareholder approval (page 13)

Kerman State Bank’s board of directors believes that the merger is in the best interests of Kerman State Bank and its shareholders and has unanimously approved the merger agreement. Kerman State Bank’s board recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the merger agreement.

Shareholders of Westamerica and Kerman State Bank have different rights (page 65)

The rights of holders of Westamerica common stock are different in some respects from the rights of holders of Kerman State Bank common stock. You should consider these differences when voting on the merger.

Dissenters’ rights of appraisal (page 2240 and AppendixAnnex C)

     InsteadYou will be given the opportunity to exercise dissenters’ rights in accordance with certain procedures specified under California law, provided that demands are made for payment with respect to 5% or more of receiving Westamericathe outstanding shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock. This means that shareholders who vote against the merger may make a written demand to Redwood Empire Bancorp for payment in cash of the “fair market value” of their shares. Redwood Empire Bancorp must receive the demand no later than the date of the special meeting. To exercise dissenters’ rights, you must vote shares against the merger; it is not sufficient

4


to abstain from voting. The Redwood Empire Bancorp board of directors has determined that the “fair market value” of one share of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock you may be entitled to cash equal tofor this purpose is $25.99. That amount represents the fair value of your Kerman State Bank shareslast reported sale price for Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock on August 25, 2004, the business day before the public announcement of the merger if you perfectmerger. You may disagree with the Redwood Empire Bancorp board of directors’ determination of the fair market value. The procedure for exercising your dissenters’ rights.

3


rights is summarized under the heading “The Merger — Dissenters’ rights of appraisal.” The relevant provisions of California law on dissenters’ rights are attached to this document as Annex C.

Benefits to certain officers and directors in the merger (page 20)35)

     In considering the recommendation of the board of directors of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp to approve the merger agreement, you should be aware that certain executive officers and directors of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp have certain interests in, and will receive benefits as a consequence of, the merger that are different from the benefits to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders generally. These interests include:

 • Certainvesting of all outstanding stock options, which, based on anticipated holdings as of December 1, 2004 and merger consideration of $28.74, would result in an estimated aggregate benefit to executive officers and directors of Kerman State Bank will receive fully vested options to acquire Westamerica common stock in place of existing vestedapproximately $508,150; and unvested options to acquire Kerman State Bank common stock;
 
 • Certainpotential severance benefits available to executive officers of Kerman State Bank will be eligible to receiveand directors under various severance policies, change in control agreements and salary continuation agreements, which could result in cash severance payments of up to twelve months salaryexecutive officers and in certain instances, bonuses if Westamerica does not make an offer to retain them as employees in comparable positions or if such officers aredirectors, assuming all were terminated during the twelve month periodimmediately following the merger.merger, of approximately $1,670,055 in the aggregate.

Shareholders of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp have different rights (page 69)

The rights of holders of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock are different in some respects from the rights of holders of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock. You should consider these differences when voting on the merger.

Information regarding Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp (pages 3321, 54 and 42)64)

Westamerica Bancorporation

4550 Mangels Boulevard
Fairfield, CA 94585-1200
(415) 257-8000
www.westamerica.com
Westamerica Bancorporation
4550 Mangels Boulevard
Fairfield, CA 94585-1200
[(415) 257-8000]
www.westamerica.com

     Westamerica Bancorporation is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. Westamerica Bancorporation was incorporated under the laws of the State of California as “Independent Bankshares Corporation” on February 11, 1972. It is the parent of Westamerica Bank and Community Banker Services Corporation. Westamerica Bancorporation has 9088 branches throughout northern and central California. Westamerica isBancorporation as of June 30, 2003, was the 13th14th largest bank and 19th18th largest depository institution, measured by deposits, in California. At December 31, 2001,June 30, 2004 it had total assets of $3.9$4.6 billion, deposits of approximately $3.2$3.5 billion and shareholders’ equity of $314$329.8 million.

Kerman State Bank

306 South Madera Avenue
Kerman, CA 93630
(559) 846-5321
Redwood Empire Bancorp
111 Santa Rosa Avenue
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
(707) 573-4800

     Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp is a state banking corporation licensed as a commercial bank byholding company registered under the California DepartmentBank Holding Company Act of Financial Institutions (“DFI”).1956. It was originally incorporated in 1983. It is headquartered1988 for the purpose of becoming the holding company of National Bank of the Redwoods, a national banking association founded in Kerman, Fresno County, California. Kerman State Bank1985. Redwood Empire Bancorp conducts a general commercial banking business through its main office in Santa Rosa, California, five retail branches located in Sonoma County, California, one retail branch located in Mendocino County, California, and two branchesone retail branch located in Firebaugh and Easton,Lake County, California. At December 31, 2001, Kerman State BankJune 30, 2004, Redwood Empire Bancorp had assets of

5


approximately $106$515.4 million, deposits of approximately $93$453.0 million and shareholders’ equity of approximately $12$28.3 million.

Special shareholders meeting to be held on [meeting date], 20022004 (page 10)18)

     We will hold the special meeting of shareholders of Redwood Empire Bancorp at [meeting time] on Thursday, [meeting date], 2002,2004, at Kerman State Bank, 306 South MaderaRedwood Empire Bancorp, 111 Santa Rosa Avenue, Kerman,Santa Rosa, California 93630.95404. At the special meeting, you will be asked (1) to approve the merger agreement and (2) to consider such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Record date set at April 15, 2002;[record date], 2004; vote required for approval of merger (page 11)19)

     You can vote at the special meeting if you owned Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock at the close of business on April 15, 2002.[record date], 2004. Holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock must vote to approve the merger agreement in order for the merger to occur.

4


Conditions that must be satisfied for the merger to occur (page 30)51)

     We will not complete the merger unless a number of conditions are met. These include:

 • approval of the merger agreement by Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders,
 
 • receipt of all required regulatory approvals,approvals;
 
 • absence of material adverse changes in the parties, unless waived; and
 
 • absencesatisfaction by Redwood Empire Bancorp of any orders suspending the effectivenesscertain financial conditions relating to its levels of the registration statement filedperforming loans, noninterest-bearing deposits and shareholders’ equity, unless waived by Westamerica to register the shares to be issued to Kerman State Bank shareholders.Bancorporation.

Regulatory approvals we must obtain for the merger to occur (page 19)34)

     The merger requires the prior approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) under the Bank Merger Act and of the DFI.California Department of Financial Institutions under the California Financial Code. The FRB may require Westamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire Bancorp to divest deposits in Lake County as a condition to its approval. If such divestiture is required, the merger consideration could be reduced by up to $0.30 per share.

Westamerica Bancorporation to use purchase accounting treatment (page 21)38)

     Westamerica Bancorporation will account for the merger as a purchase. Under the purchase accounting method, Westamerica Bancorporation will revalue on its books the assets and liabilities of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp at their fair market values, and the amount by which the aggregate merger consideration exceeds the net fair values of the assets of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp will be recorded as intangible assets calledintangibles such as goodwill or core deposit intangible.

Termination of the merger agreement (page 32)52)

     The merger agreement may be terminated before completion as follows:

 • by the mutual consent of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp and Westamerica;Westamerica Bancorporation;
 
 • by either party if the conditions to its obligations have not been fulfilled;met by May 25, 2005;
• by either party if the shareholders of Redwood Empire Bancorp fail to approve the merger agreement at the Special Meeting;
 
 • by either party if the other fails to comply materially with its obligations under the merger agreement;agreement and fails to cure within 60 days;
• by either party if any necessary governmental approval has been denied;
 
 • by Westamerica Bancorporation if someone other than Westamerica enters intoRedwood Empire Bancorp materially breaches its obligation not to solicit or encourage a different transaction for the acquisition of Kerman State Bank;Redwood Empire Bancorp, and, in the

6


event of such termination, Redwood Empire Bancorp will be liable to Westamerica Bancorporation for a break-up fee of $4,500,000;
 
 • by Westamerica Bancorporation if itsthe board of directors determines that it is not advisableof Redwood Empire Bancorp fails to consummaterecommend adoption of the merger by reasonagreement at the special meeting, and, in the event of any material legal impediment; orsuch termination, Redwood Empire Bancorp will be liable to Westamerica Bancorporation for a break-up fee of $4,500,000;
 
 • by Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp if Westamerica entersits board of directors authorizes it to enter into a superior transaction with someone providing for the acquisition of Redwood Empire Bancorp, and, in the event of such termination, Redwood Empire Bancorp will be liable to Westamerica which does not provideBancorporation for the assumptiona break-up fee of $4,500,000;
• by either party if Westamerica Bancorporation solicits or encourages an acquisition of Westamerica Bancorporation that would materially interfere with its obligations under the merger agreement.agreement, and, in the event of such termination, Westamerica Bancorporation will be liable to Redwood Empire Bancorp for a break-up fee of $4,500,000;
• by Westamerica Bancorporation if the Westamerica average closing price is greater than $60.66; and
• by Redwood Empire Bancorp if the Westamerica average closing price is less than $40.44.

     If Westamerica terminates the merger agreement as a result of Kerman State Bank’s failure to obtain a fairness opinion or shareholder approval, or due to Kerman State Bank’s breach of the merger agreement, then Kerman State Bank must pay Westamerica a fee of $250,000.

     If Kerman State Bank terminates the merger agreement as a result of its failure to obtain a fairness opinion, then Kerman State Bank must pay Westamerica a fee of $250,000. If Kerman State Bank terminates this Agreement due to a breach of the merger agreement by Westamerica Bancorporation or Westamerica, then Westamerica shall pay Kerman State Bank a fee of $250,000.

     If Kerman State Bank enters into or solicits a competing transaction, Westamerica may terminate the merger agreement and Kerman State Bank will be liable for a break-up fee of $1,500,000. If Westamerica enters into a competing transaction that precludes Westamerica from completing the merger, Kerman State Bank may terminate the merger agreement and Westamerica will be liable for a break-up fee of $1,000,000.

57


Selected Financial Information aboutAbout Westamerica Bancorporation

     The following table presents selected supplemental historical financial information for Westamerica Bancorporation for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2001.2003, and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. This information has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the supplemental consolidated financial statements of Westamerica Bancorporation, including the notes to such financial statements, which are incorporated by reference elsewhere in this document.

                       
Year Ended December 31,

20012000199919981997





(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 Interest income $257,056  $269,516  $257,656  $266,820  $270,670 
 Interest expense  68,887   88,614   78,456   86,665   88,054 
 Net interest income  188,169   180,902   179,200   180,155   182,616 
 Provision for loan losses  3,600   3,675   4,780   5,180   7,645 
 Non-interest income  42,655   41,130   40,174   37,805   37,013 
 Non-interest expense  102,651   100,198   100,133   101,408   137,878 
 Income before income taxes  124,573   118,159   114,461   111,372   74,106 
 Provision for income taxes  40,294   38,380   38,373   37,976   25,990 
  Net income $84,279  $79,779  $76,088  $73,396  $48,116 
Earnings per share:                    
 Basic $2.39  $2.19  $1.97  $1.76  $1.12 
 Diluted  2.36   2.16   1.94   1.73   1.10 
Per share:                    
 Dividends paid $0.82  $0.74  $0.66  $0.52  $0.36 
 Book value at December 31  9.19   9.32   8.10   9.25   9.51 
Average common shares outstanding  35,213   36,410   38,588   41,797   43,040 
Average diluted common shares outstanding  35,748   36,936   39,194   42,524   43,827 
Shares outstanding at December 31  34,220   36,251   37,125   39,828   42,799 
At December 31
                    
 Loans, net $2,432,371  $2,429,880  $2,269,272  $2,246,593  $2,211,307 
 Total assets  3,927,967   4,031,381   3,893,187   3,844,298   3,848,444 
 Total deposits  3,234,635   3,236,744   3,065,344   3,189,005   3,078,501 
 Short-term borrowed funds  311,911   386,942   462,345   203,671   264,848 
 Debt financing and notes payable  27,821   31,036   41,500   47,500   52,500 
 Shareholders’ equity  314,359   337,747   300,592   368,596   407,152 
Financial Ratios:
                    
For the year:                    
 Return on assets  2.18%  2.06%  1.99%  1.94%  1.28%
 Return on equity  27.17%  25.78%  23.31%  19.48%  12.71%
 Net interest margin(1)  5.71%  5.48%  5.46%  5.52%  5.63%
 Net loan losses to average loans  0.15%  0.17%  0.20%  0.20%  0.35%
 Efficiency ratio(2)  41.67%  42.45%  43.19%  44.25%  60.15%
At December 31:                    
 Equity to assets  8.00%  8.38%  7.72%  9.59%  10.58%
 Total capital to risk-adjusted assets  10.63%  11.61%  11.75%  13.79%  14.76%
 Loan loss reserve to loans  2.10%  2.11%  2.22%  2.23%  2.24%
                              
At and for the Six Months
Ended June 30,At and for the Year Ended December 31,


2004200320032002200120001999







(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest income $107,682  $113,724  $223,493  $237,633  $257,056  $269,516  $257,656 
Interest expense  10,111   15,146   27,197   39,182   68,887   88,614   78,456 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Net interest income  97,571   98,578   196,296   198,451   188,169   180,902   179,200 
Provision for loan losses  1,500   1,800   3,300   3,600   3,600   3,675   4,780 
Noninterest income:                            
 Securities gains (impairment)  2,183   293   2,443   (4,278)         
 Loss on extinguishment of debt  (2,204)  0   (2,166)            
 Deposit services charges and other  22,547   21,118   42,639   40,829   42,655   41,130   40,174 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total noninterest income  22,526   21,411   42,916   36,551   42,655   41,130   40,174 
Noninterest expense  49,982   51,011   101,703   103,323   102,651   100,198   100,133 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Income before income taxes  68,615   67,178   134,209   128,079   124,573   118,159   114,461 
Provision for income taxes  19,657   20,495   39,146   40,941   40,294   38,380   38,373 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Net income $48,958  $46,683  $95,063  $87,138  $84,279  $79,779  $76,088 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Earnings per share:                            
 Basic $1.53   1.41  $2.89  $2.59  $2.39  $2.19  $1.97 
 Diluted  1.51   1.39   2.85   2.55   2.36   2.16   1.94 
Per share:                            
 Dividends paid $0.54  $0.48  $1.00  $0.90  $0.82  $0.74  $0.66 
 Book value at period end  10.38   10.85   10.54   10.22   9.19   9.32   8.10 
Average common shares outstanding  31,906   33,054   32,849   33,686   35,213   36,410   38,588 
Average diluted common shares outstanding  32,502   33,528   33,369   34,225   35,748   36,936   39,194 
Shares outstanding at period end  31,784   32,937   32,287   33,411   34,220   36,251   37,125 
At Period End:                            
Loans, net $2,265,306  $2,352,730  $2,269,420  $2,440,411  $2,432,371  $2,429,880  $2,269,272 
Investments  1,985,320   1,839,572   1,949,288   1,386,833   1,158,139   1,149,310   1,219,491 
Total assets  4,611,811   4,564,692   4,576,385   4,224,867   3,927,967   4,031,381   3,893,187 
Total deposits  3,505,429   3,453,631   3,463,991   3,294,065   3,234,635   3,236,744   3,065,344 
Short-term borrowed funds  712,553   393,287   590,646   349,736   271,911   386,942   462,345 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances     170,000   105,000   170,000   40,000       
Debt financing and notes payable  21,429   21,393   24,643   24,607   27,821   31,036   41,500 
Intangible assets  22,162   22,762   22,433   23,176   19,013   20,376   10,200 
Shareholders’ equity  329,795   357,311   340,371   341,499   314,359   337,747   300,592 

8


                              
At and for the Six Months
Ended June 30,At and for the Year Ended December 31,


2004200320032002200120001999







(In thousands, except per share data)
Financial Ratios:                            
For the Period:                            
 Return on assets  2.20%  2.21%  2.19%  2.17%  2.18%  2.06%  1.99%
 Return on equity  30.82%  29.44%  29.38%  28.70%  27.17%  25.78%  23.31%
 Net interest margin*  5.24%  5.51%  5.39%  5.76%  5.71%  5.48%  5.46%
 Net loan losses to average loans  0.13%  0.16%  0.15%  0.14%  0.15%  0.17%  0.20%
 Noninterest expense to total revenue*  38.0%  39.3%  39.1%  41.0%  41.7%  42.5%  43.2%
At Period End:                            
 Equity to assets  7.15%  7.83%  7.44%  8.08%  8.00%  8.38%  7.72%
 Total capital to risk-adjusted assets  11.78%  11.32%  11.39%  10.97%  10.63%  11.61%  11.75%
 Allowance for loan losses to loans  2.33%  2.25%  2.32%  2.17%  2.10%  2.11%  2.22%


(1)* Fully taxable equivalent
(2) The ratio of non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income (FTE) and non-interest income.

69


Selected Financial Information about Kerman State BankAbout Redwood Empire Bancorp

     ThisThe following table presents selected supplemental historical financial information for Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp for each of the years 1997 to 2001 is only a summary. You should read it with the audited financial statements and the accompanying notes of Kerman State Bank. Kerman State Bank’s financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the twofive years in the period ended December 31, 20012003, and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. This information has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the supplemental consolidated financial statements of Redwood Empire Bancorp including the notes to such financial statements, which are includedincorporated by reference elsewhere in this document.

                     
Year Ended December 31,

20012000199919981997





Unaudited
(Dollars in thousands except per share date)
Results of Operations
                    
Interest income $7,495  $9,573  $7,742  $8,138  $7,469 
Interest expense  2,690   4,429   3,127   3,241   2,936 
Net interest income  4,805   5,144   4,615   4,897   4,533 
Provision for loan losses  295   590   570   185   15 
Noninterest income  998   934   860   821   611 
Noninterest expense  4,005   3,968   3,559   3,469   2,969 
Income before income taxes  1,503   1,519   1,346   2,064   2,160 
Provision for income taxes  522   530   427   770   824 
Net income  981   989   919   1,294   1,336 
Basic earnings per share $0.69  $0.68  $0.63  $0.87(1) $0.91(1)
Number of shares used in basic earnings per share calculation  1,430,026   1,460,918   1,455,966   1,480,859(1)  1,474,685(1)
Diluted earnings per share $0.69  $0.68  $0.63  $0.87(1) $0.90(1)
Number of shares used in diluted earnings per share calculation  1,432,226   1,460,918   1,455,966   1,484,536(1)  1,481,414(1)
Balance sheet (end of period)
                    
Total assets $105,328  $113,789  $106,344  $103,010  $107,576 
Net loans  62,916   75,646   64,445   62,303   57,469 
Deposits  92,877   101,575   95,739   92,492   96,677 
Shareholders’ equity  11,752   10,911   9,908   9,992   10,121 
Financial ratios
                    
Tier 1 risk-based capital  15.13%  11.81%  10.75%  13.00%  14.51%
Total risk-based capital  16.39%  13.06%  12.32%  14.11%  15.45%
Leverage ratio  11.24%  9.22%  9.37%  9.85%  11.63%
Allowance for loan losses/ period end loans  2.02%  1.64%  2.15%  1.33%  1.16%
Return on average assets  0.93%  0.86%  0.89%  1.29%  1.48%
Return on average equity  8.86%  9.12%  9.61%  12.94%  13.46%
Nonperforming assets to total assets  4.78%  2.58%  3.33%  2.45%  0.66%
                             
At or for the Six
Months Ended June 30,At or for the Year Ended December 31,


2004200320032002200120001999(2)







(In thousands, except per share data)
Statements of Operations:
                            
Total interest income $14,194  $15,150  $30,134  $30,536  $33,555  $35,163  $30,633 
Net interest income  11,039   11,208   22,766   20,866   20,104   20,844   19,687 
Provision for loan losses                 150   750 
Noninterest income  3,607   3,278   6,833   7,615   6,599   6,106   5,197 
Income from continuing operations  3,539   4,197   7,649   7,961   7,307   6,466   4,599 
Loss from discontinued operations                    (437)
Net income  3,539   4,197   7,649   7,961   7,307   6,466   4,162 
Balance Sheets:
                            
Total assets $515,421  $525,874  $528,900  $513,181  $448,742  $453,439  $423,046 
Total loans  424,086   415,063   414,521   365,076   351,649   315,101   314,445 
Allowance for loan losses  7,039   7,492   7,162   7,400   7,580   7,674   7,931 
Total deposits  453,043   466,635   454,782   453,093   397,412   405,333   369,509 
Subordinated debentures  20,000   10,000   20,000   10,000   10,000       
Shareholders’ equity  28,268   30,276   27,680   28,807   26,687   35,459   37,444 
Performance and Financial Ratios(3):
                            
Return on average assets from continuing operations(3)  1.37%  1.64%  1.48%  1.62%  1.63%  1.47%  1.13%
Return on average common equity from continuing operations(3)  25.52%  29.31%  27.25%  28.98%  26.41%  17.75%  11.70%
Common dividend payout ratio  58.72%  40.39%  44.34%  35.08%  18.09%  25.29%  19.51%
Average equity to average assets from continuing operations  5.39%  5.59%  5.43%  5.58%  6.17%  8.30%  9.66%
Leverage ratio  6.82%  7.26%  6.47%  6.59%  7.46%  7.72%  8.66%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio  8.03%  9.13%  7.93%  8.69%  9.52%  9.99%  11.74%
Total risk-based capital ratio  11.86%  10.51%  11.94%  10.36%  11.16%  11.25%  13.01%
Net interest margin from continuing operations(3)  4.58%  4.62%  4.66%  4.49%  4.78%  5.08%  5.30%
Noninterest expense from continuing operations to net interest income and other noninterest income from continuing operations  59.75%  55.14%  55.41%  56.20%  54.12%  59.18%  66.07%
Average earning assets to average total assets from continuing operations  93.65%  94.68%  94.44%  94.34%  93.72%  93.50%  91.20%
Nonperforming assets to total assets  0.30%  0.59%  0.24%  0.54%  0.71%  0.43%  1.52%
Net loan charge-offs to average loans(3)  -0.06%  0.05%  0.06%  0.05%  0.03%  0.12%  0.29%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans  1.66%  1.81%  1.73%  2.03%  2.16%  2.44%  2.52%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans  448%  241%  566%  265%  239%  638%  194%

10


                              
At or for the Six
Months Ended June 30,At or for the Year Ended December 31,


2004200320032002200120001999(2)







(In thousands, except per share data)
Share Data(1):
                            
Common shares outstanding (000)  4,948   5,115   4,951   5,108   5,295   6,431   7,266 
Book value per common share $5.71  $5.92  $5.59  $5.64  $5.04  $5.51  $5.15 
Basic earnings per common share:                            
 Income from continuing operations  0.72   0.83   1.52   1.53   1.32   .94   .61 
 Loss from discontinued operations                    (.06)
 Net income available for common stock shareholders  0.72   0.83   1.52   1.53   1.32   .94   .55 
 Weighted average shares outstanding (000)  4,946   5,081   5,026   5,211   5,555   6,866   7,569 
Diluted earnings per common share:                            
 Income from continuing operations $0.69  $0.80  $1.48  $1.47  $1.27  $0.92  $0.59 
 Loss from discontinued operations                    (.06)
 Net income available for common stock shareholders  0.69   0.80   1.48   1.47   1.27   0.92   0.54 
 Weighted average shares outstanding (000)  5,093   5,239   5,184   5,400   5,738   6,996   7,776 
Cash dividends per common share $0.42  $0.33  $.67  $.53  $.25  $.25  $.11 


(1) Restated for 2001 and 2003 3 for 2 stock splits.
(2) Amounts previously reported as an extraordinary loss for the year ended December 31, 1999 have been reclassified to other expense in order to comply with FASB Statement No. 145. The related ratios and per share data have been restated to reflect 1999 stock dividendgive effect to this reclassification.
(3) Ratios for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are annualized.

711


Selected Consolidated Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

     The following table shows information about our financial condition and results of operations, including per share data and financial ratios, after giving effect to the merger. This information is called pro forma financial information in this document. The table sets forth the information as if the merger had become effective on June 30, 2004, with respect to financial condition data, and on January 1, 2003, with respect to results of operations data. This pro forma financial information assumes that the merger is accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and represents a current estimate based on available information of the combined company’s results of operations. See “Accounting Treatment” on page 38. The pro forma information is based on an assumed Westamerica average closing price of $55.25 (the average closing price for the 20 trading days ended October 11, 2004) and a corresponding exchange ratio of 0.3122. The pro forma financial information includes adjustments to record the assets and liabilities of Redwood Empire Bancorp at their estimated fair values and is subject to further adjustment as additional information becomes available and as additional analyses are performed. The pro forma financial statements do not currently include costs that will be incurred by Westamerica Bancorporation after completion of the merger to combine the operations of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp. This table should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the historical financial statements, including the notes thereto, of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp incorporated by reference in this document and the more detailed pro forma financial information, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this document. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” on page 78 and “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” on page 71.

     The pro forma financial information, while helpful in illustrating the financial characteristics of the combined company under one set of assumptions, does not reflect the impact of possible revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies, asset dispositions and share repurchases, among other factors, that may result as a consequence of the merger and, accordingly, does not attempt to predict or suggest future results. It also does not necessarily reflect what the historical results of the combined company would have been had our companies been combined during these periods.

12


Selected Consolidated Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

June 30, 2004
                  
Redwood
WestamericaEmpireDR(CR)Pro Forma
BancorporationBancorpAdjustmentsCombined




For the Period:
                
Interest income $107,682  $14,194  $0  $121,876 
Interest expense  10,111   3,155   0   13,266 
   
   
   
   
 
Net interest income  97,571   11,039       108,610 
Provision for loan losses  1,500   0       1,500 
Noninterest income  22,526   3,607       26,133 
Noninterest expense  49,982   8,751   1,057   59,790 
   
   
   
   
 
Income before income taxes  68,615   5,895       73,453 
Provision for income taxes  19,657   2,356   (444)  21,569 
   
   
   
   
 
Net income $48,958  $3,539  $(613) $51,884 
   
   
   
   
 
Earnings per share:                
 Basic $1.53  $0.72      $1.55 
 Diluted  1.51   0.69       1.52 
Dividends paid per share  0.54   0.42   0.00   0.54 
Average common shares outstanding  31,906   4,946   (3,401)  33,451 
Average diluted common shares outstanding  32,502   5,093   (3,438)  34,157 
At Period-End
                
Loans, net $2,265,306  $417,052  $0  $2,682,358 
Investments  1,985,320   53,523   0   2,038,843 
Total assets  4,611,811   515,421   66,974   5,194,206 
Total deposits  3,505,429   453,043   0   3,958,472 
Short-term borrowed funds  712,553   1,939   0   714,492 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances  0   0   0   0 
Debt financing and notes payable  21,429   20,000   0   41,429 
Intangible assets  22,162   1,669   131,550   155,381 
Shareholders’ equity  329,795   28,268   (63,174)  421,237 
Shares outstanding  31,784   4,948   (3,403)  33,329 
Book value per share $10.38  $5.71      $12.64 
Financial Ratios:
                
For the period:                
 Return on assets  2.20%  1.37%      2.07%
 Return on equity  30.82%  25.52%      25.41%
 Net interest margin*  5.24%  4.58%      5.18%
 Net loan losses to average loans  0.13%  (0.06)%      0.10%
 Efficiency ratio*  38.04%  59.75%      40.94%
At period-end:                
 Equity to assets  7.15%  5.48%      8.11%
 Total capital to risk-adjusted assets  11.83%  11.86%      9.53%
 Allowance for loan losses to loans  2.33%  1.66%      2.22%


* Fully taxable equivalent

13


Selected Consolidated Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

December 31, 2003
                  
Redwood
WestamericaEmpireDR(CR)Pro Forma
BancorporationBancorpAdjustmentsCombined




For the Period:
                
Interest income $223,493  $30,134  $0  $253,627 
Interest expense  27,197   7,368   0   34,565 
   
   
   
   
 
Net interest income  196,296   22,766       219,062 
Provision for loan losses  3,300   0   0   3,300 
Noninterest income  42,916   6,833   0   49,749 
Noninterest expense  101,703   16,400   2,114   120,217 
   
   
   
   
 
Income before income taxes  134,209   13,199       145,294 
Provision for income taxes  39146   5,550   (888)  43,808 
   
   
   
   
 
Net income $95,063  $7,649  $(1,226) $101,487 
   
   
   
   
 
Earnings per share:                
 Basic $2.89  $1.52      $2.95 
 Diluted  2.85   1.48       2.90 
Dividends paid per share  1.00   0.67   0.00   1.00 
Average common shares outstanding  32,849   5,026   (3,481)  34,394 
Average diluted common shares outstanding  33,369   5,184   (3,529)  35,024 
At Period-End
                
Loans, net $2,269,420  $407,551  $0  $2,676,971 
Investments  1,949,288   75,795   0   2,025,083 
Total assets  4,576,385   528,900   67,562   5,172,847 
Total deposits  3,463,991   454,782   0   3,918,773 
Short-term borrowed funds  590,646   2,765   0   593,411 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances  105,000   13,500   0   118,500 
Debt financing and notes payable  24,643   20,000   0   44,643 
Intangible assets  22,433   1,827   132,138   156,398 
Shareholders’ equity  340,371   27,680   (63,762)  431,813 
Shares outstanding  32,287   4,951   (3,406)  33,832 
Book value per share $10.54  $5.59      $12.76 
Financial Ratios:
                
For the period:                
 Return on assets  2.19%  1.48%      2.06%
 Return on equity  29.38%  27.25%      24.43%
 Net interest margin*  5.39%  4.66%      5.31%
 Net loan losses to average loans  0.15%  0.06%      0.14%
 Efficiency ratio*  39.07%  55.41%      41.47%
At period-end:                
 Equity to assets  7.44%  5.23%      8.35%
 Total capital to risk-adjusted assets  11.39%  11.94%      9.84%
 Allowance for loan losses to loans  2.32%  1.73%      2.23%


* Fully taxable equivalent

14


Comparative Per Common Share Data

     The following table sets forth for Westamerica Bancorporation common stock and Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock certain historical, pro forma and pro forma-equivalent per common share financial information. The pro forma and pro forma-equivalent per share information gives effect to the merger as if the merger had been effective on the dates presented, in the case of the book value data, and as if the merger had become effective on January 1, 2003, in the case of the income and dividends paid data. The pro forma data in the tables assume that the merger is accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and represents a current estimate based on available information of the combined company’s results of operations. See “Accounting Treatment” on page 38. The pro forma financial adjustments record the assets and liabilities of Redwood Empire Bancorp at their estimated fair values and are subject to adjustment as additional information becomes available and as additional analyses are performed.

     The pro forma information, while helpful in illustrating the financial characteristics of the combined company under one set of assumptions, does not reflect the impact of possible revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies, asset dispositions and share repurchases, among other factors, that may result as a consequence of the merger and, accordingly, does not attempt to predict or suggest future results. It also does not necessarily reflect what the historical results of the combined company would have been had our companies been combined during these periods. Upon completion of the merger, the operating results of Redwood Empire Bancorp will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements of Westamerica Bancorporation on a prospective basis.

     We have summarized the historical per share information for Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp and additional information as if the companies had been combined for the period shown (“pro forma”) calculated based on an assumed exchange ratio of 0.27310.3122 of a share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock per share of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock.

     You should read this information with Westamerica’s historical financial statements and related notes contained in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” on page 68.

Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp equivalent pro forma share amounts are calculated by multiplying the pro forma book value per share and net income per share and Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s historical per share dividends by the assumed exchange ratio so that the per share amounts equate to the respective stock values for one share of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock.stock, excluding the $11.49 per share (subject to adjustment) of cash that will be part of the merger consideration. You should not rely on the pro forma information as being indicative of the historical results that we would have had or the future results that will occur after the merger. The equivalent pro forma data reflects the purchase method of accounting and does not reflect potential cost savings or revenue enhancements, if any, that may be achieved.

                 
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2001

WestamericaKerman State Bank


Pro FormaEquivalent
HistoricalCombinedHistoricalPro Forma




Book value $9.19  $9.55  $8.23  $2.64 
Cash dividends  0.82   0.82   0.00   0.22 
Net income (basic)  2.39   2.39   0.69   0.65 
Net income (diluted)  2.36   2.36   0.69   0.64 
                   
WestamericaRedwoodPer Equivalent
BancorporationEmpire BancorpPro FormaRedwood Empire
HistoricalHistoricalCombinedBancorp Share




Income
                
 For the year ended December 31, 2003                
  Basic $2.89  $1.52  $2.95  $0.92 
  Diluted  2.85   1.48   2.90   0.90 
 For the six months ended June 30, 2004                
  Basic  1.53   0.72   1.55   0.48 
  Diluted  1.51   0.69   1.52   0.47 
Cash Dividends Paid
                
 For the year ended December 31, 2003  1.00   0.67   1.00   0.31 
 For the six months ended June 30, 2004  0.54   0.42   0.54   0.17 
Book Value
                
 As of December 31, 2003  10.54   5.59   12.76   3.98 
 As of June 30, 2004  10.38   5.71   12.64   3.95 

815


RISK FACTORS

     In addition to the other information included in this document, you should consider the matters described below carefully in determining whether to approve the merger agreement. Where “we” andor “our” is used in this section, it is meant to refer to both Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank before the merger and to Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank following its proposed acquisition of Kerman State Bank.Redwood Empire Bancorp and National Bank of the Redwoods.

     The value of the merger consideration fluctuates based on Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s stock price and the financial performanceany required divestiture of Kerman State Bankdeposits in specified areas.Lake County, California. The exchange ratio is based on the average price per share of Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the three tradingbusiness days before the day the merger is consummated. This average price may vary from the market price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock on the date the merger was announced, on the date that this document is mailed to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders, and on the date of the special meeting of Kerman State Bank shareholders.Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders and on the date the merger is completed. Any change in the price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock prior to completion of the merger may affect the value of the merger consideration that you will receive upon completion of the merger. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, the exchange ratiomerger consideration will be affectedreduced if any governmental agency requires divestment of deposits by Kerman State Bank’s levelWestamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire Bancorp in Lake County, California.

The fairness opinion obtained by Redwood Empire Bancorp from its financial adviser will not reflect changes in circumstances between the signing of performing loans, the levelagreement and the merger. Redwood Empire Bancorp has not obtained an updated fairness opinion as of the date of this document from its allowance for loan losses,financial advisor, Hovde Financial LLC. Changes in the occurrenceoperations and prospects of Westamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire Bancorp, general market and economic conditions and other factors that may be beyond the control of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp, and on which the fairness opinion was based, may alter the value of Westamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire Bancorp or the respective prices of shares of their common stock by the time the merger is completed. The opinion does not speak as of the time the merger will be completed or as of any “significant liabilities” (generally, expenses above certain thresholds expensesdate other than the date of the opinion. For a description of the opinion that were unplanned or not approvedRedwood Empire Bancorp received from its advisor, please refer to “The Merger — Opinion of Redwood Empire Bancorp’s financial advisor” on page 25. For a description of the other factors considered by Westamerica Bancorporation’s board of directors in advancedetermining to approve the merger, please refer to “The Merger — Westamerica Bancorporation’s Reasons for the Merger” on page 25. For a description of the other factors considered by Westamerica), as well as by Westamerica’s stock price.Redwood Empire Bancorp’s board of directors in determining to approve the merger, please refer to “The Merger — Redwood Empire Bancorp’s Reasons for the Merger” on page 23.

     There are uncertainties in integrating our business operations and realizing enhanced earnings. If we are unable to integrate our businesses successfully, this could hurt our business. The merger involves the integration of companies that have previously operated independently. No assurance can be given that Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp will be able to integrate their operations without encountering difficulties including, without limitation, the loss of key employees and customers, the disruption of their respective ongoing businesses, or possible inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies.policies and possible difficulties in integrating information and data processing systems.

     The merger agreement limits Redwood Empire Bancorp’s ability to pursue alternatives to the merger. The merger agreement contains “no shop” provisions that, subject to limited exceptions, limit Redwood Empire Bancorp’s ability to discuss, facilitate or commit to competing third-party proposals to acquire all or a significant part of the company. In addition, the merger agreement provides that Redwood Empire Bancorp must pay a break-up fee of $4,500,000 if the merger agreement is terminated because Redwood Empire Bancorp solicits or enters into a competing third-party transaction. These provisions might discourage a potential competing acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of Redwood Empire Bancorp from considering or proposing that acquisition even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share market price than that proposed in the merger, or might result in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay a lower per share price to acquire Redwood Empire Bancorp than it might otherwise have proposed to pay. The merger agreement also limits Westamerica Bancorporation’s ability to enter into an

16


agreement for a competing business combination, but only if that agreement did not permit Westamerica Bancorporation to complete the merger with Redwood Empire Bancorp.

Further economic slowdown in California could hurt our business. Westamerica Bancorporation has focused its business in Northern and Central California. Kerman State Bank is located solely in Fresno County, and itsMuch of Redwood Empire Bancorp’s business is dependent to a significant extent on the agricultural economy.focused in Sonoma, Mendocino and Lake Counties of Northern California. These areas have experienced economic difficulties in the recent past, and a further economic slowdown in California could have the following consequences:

 • Loan delinquencies may increase;
 
 • Problem assets and foreclosures may increase;
 
 • Demand for our products and services may decline; and
 
 • Collateral for loans made by us, especially real estate, may decline in value, and in turn reduce ourreducing customers’ borrowing power.

Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders will not control Westamerica Bancorporation’s future operations. Following the merger, Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders in the aggregate will become owners of approximately 5.1% of the outstanding shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock. Accordingly, former Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders will not have a significant impact on the election of directors or on whether future Westamerica Bancorporation proposals are approved or rejected.

Westamerica Bancorporation’s shareholders’ rights plan may have anti-takeover effects, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for its common stock. Westamerica Bancorporation’s board of directors has adopted a preferred stock purchase rights plan, commonly known as a “poison pill.” The rights plan is intended to prevent abusive hostile takeover attempts by requiring a potential acquirer to negotiate the terms of an acquisition with Westamerica Bancorporation’s board of directors. However, the rights plan could have the effect of deterring or preventing an acquisition of the combined company, even if a majority of the shareholders would be in favor of such acquisition, and could also make it more difficult for a person or group to gain control of the combined company or to change existing management.

Additional risks concerning ownership of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock are discussed in this document under the caption “Information about Westamerica Bancorporation — Certain additional business risks.”

INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This proxy statement/ prospectus contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp in the future. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to statements relating to the cost savings whichthat we expect to realize from the merger, the expected impact of the merger on Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s financial performance, earnings estimates for the combined company, the market value of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock in the future and other statements identified by words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “should,” “seeks,” “estimates” or words of similar meaning. (see “The Merger — Reasons for the Merger; Recommendations of the board of directors”). These forward-looking statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.

9


Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities:

 • expected cost savings from the merger cannot be fully realized;
 
 • deposit attrition, customer loss or revenue loss following the merger is greater than expected;
 
 • costs or difficulties related to the integration of the business of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp are greater than expected;

17


• competitive pressure in the banking and financial services industry increases significantly;
 
 • operational risks including data processing system failures or fraud;
• costs or difficulties related to the integration of the business of Westamerica and Kerman State Bank are greater than expected;
 
 • changes in the interest rate environment reduce margins;
 
 • general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, are less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;
 
 • increased economic uncertainty resulting from recent terrorist attacks and the threat of similar attacks in the future;
 
 • changes in the regulatory environment;
 
 • changes in business conditions and inflation; and
 
 • changes in the securities markets.

     The forward-looking earnings estimates included in this document have not been examined or compiled by the independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm of Westamerica Bancorporation or Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp nor have such accountants applied any procedures to those estimates. Accordingly, such accountants do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them. Further information on other factors which could affect the financial results of Westamerica Bancorporation after the merger is included in the SEC filings incorporated by reference into this document.

SPECIAL MEETING OF KERMAN STATE BANKREDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP SHAREHOLDERS

Date, timeTime and placePlace of meetingMeeting

     The special meeting of shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp will be held on [meeting date], 2002,2004, at [meeting time] local time at Kerman State Bank, 306 South MaderaRedwood Empire Bancorp, 111 Santa Rosa Avenue, Kerman,Santa Rosa, California 93630.95404.

The meetingMeeting

     At the meeting, the shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp will be asked to consider and vote on the merger agreement dated FebruaryAugust 25, 20022004 among Westamerica Bancorporation, Westamerica Bank, Redwood Empire Bancorp and Kerman State Bank.National Bank of the Redwoods and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The merger agreement is included as AppendixAnnex A to this proxy statement/ prospectus and is incorporated in this proxy statement/ prospectus by reference. Under the merger agreement:

 • Kerman StateRedwood Empire Bancorp will merge with Westamerica Bancorporation;
• National Bank of the Redwoods will merge with Westamerica Bank; and
 
 • each share of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock wouldwill be converted into the right to receive 0.2731$28.74, consisting of $11.49 in cash and $17.25 in shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, of Westamerica, subject to adjustment depending on such factors as Kerman State Bank’s “significant liabilities” (described on page 2), allowance for loan losses, performing loans and equity as of the closing date and subject to decrease if Westamerica’s average closing stock price before closing is above $41.76 or increase if Westamerica’svalued at its average closing price for the 20 trading days ending three business days before the effective date of the merger. The merger consideration may be reduced by up to $0.30 per share (allocated proportionately between cash and stock) if regulatory agencies require Westamerica Bancorporation to divest deposits in Lake County as a condition of approving the merger. The value of the stock portion will increase if the average closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock over the 20-trading day period ending three business days before completion of the merger is below $33.80.greater than $55.6050 and will decrease if the average closing price during that period is less than $45.4950.

The board of directors of recommends a vote for the merger

     In addition to the proposal to approve the merger agreement, at the special meeting you will be asked to act upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, including a motion to adjourn.

10The Redwood Empire Bancorp Board of Directors Recommends a Vote for the Merger

     The board of directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp has unanimously approved the merger and the merger agreement and unanimously recommends that shareholders vote in favor of the merger and the merger agreement.

18


Record dateDate and voting rightsVoting Rights

     Only holders of record of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock at the close of business on April 15, 2002[record date], 2004 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. At the record date, there were approximately  470 shareholders of record and                      1,427,507 shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. A majority of the shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock entitled to vote, present in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum. Directors and executive officers of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp and their affiliates owned beneficially as of the record date an aggregate of 297,32848,825 shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock (excluding exercisable stock options)options to acquire 154,059 shares), or approximately 20.8%1.0% of the outstanding Kerman State Bankshares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock. At that date, B. John Barry owned beneficially 1,400,000 shares or approximately 28.3% of the outstanding shares of the common stock, and certain relatives and a business associate of Mr. Barry owned in the aggregate 1,056,321 shares or approximately 21.3% of the outstanding shares of the common stock.

     Each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock he or she owns.

Vote requiredRequired

     Approval of the merger by Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. The directors and executive officers of Redwood Empire Bancorp and their affiliates together held approximately 1.0% of Redwood Empire Bancorp’s outstanding common stock as of the record date. You should be aware that Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders holding approximately 49.6% of the outstanding shares have agreed to vote in favor of the merger and have given Westamerica Bancorporation irrevocable proxies to vote their shares in favor of the merger and that directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp, who in the aggregate own approximately 1.0% of the outstanding shares, have also agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger. Therefore shareholder approval of the merger is effectively assured.

     The Merger does not require the approval of the shareholders of Westamerica Bancorporation.

All votes will be tabulated by Redwood Empire Bancorp’s transfer agent, Mellon Investor Services LLC. A representative of Mellon Investor Services LLC will be in attendance at the special meeting in order to receive any votes cast at that time.

Voting by proxyProxy

     Shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp may use the enclosed proxy if they are unable to attend the meeting in person or wish to have their shares voted by proxy even if they attend the meeting. All proxies that are properly executed and returned, unless revoked, will be voted at the meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated or, if no instruction is indicated, in favor of the merger. The execution of a proxy will not affect the right of a shareholder to attend the meeting and vote in person.

Revocability of proxiesProxies

     A person who has given a proxy may revoke it any time before it is exercised at the meeting by filing with the Secretary of Kerman State Bank,Redwood Empire Bancorp a written notice of revocation or a proxy bearing a later date or by attendance at the meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.

Adjournments

     The meeting may be adjourned, even if a quorum is not present, by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting in person or by proxy. In the absence of a quorum at the meeting, no other business may be transacted at the meeting.

     Notice of the adjournment of a meeting need not be given if the time and place thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken, provided that if the adjournment is for more than 45 days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. At an adjourned meeting, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the original meeting.

19


Solicitation of proxiesProxies

     The proxy relating to the meeting is being solicited by the board of directors of Kerman State Bank. Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp. Redwood Empire Bancorp will bear the cost of soliciting proxies and Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire will share the cost of printing and distributing the proxy statement/ prospectus. Copies of solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians holding in their names shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock beneficially owned by others to forward to such beneficial owners. Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp may reimburse such persons representing beneficial owners of its shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, telegram or personal solicitation by directors, officers or other regular employees of Kerman State Bank,Redwood Empire Bancorp, who will not receive any additional compensation for such efforts.

Other mattersMatters

     The board of Kerman State Bankdirectors of Redwood Empire Bancorp is not aware of any matters to come before the special meeting other than the approval of the merger agreement. If any other matters should be brought before the special meeting,

11


or any adjournment thereof, upon which a vote properly may be taken, the proxy holders will vote in their discretion unless otherwise provided in the proxies. If the merger is completed, Kerman State Bank will not hold an annual meeting of shareholders in 2002.

20


PROPOSAL ONE —INFORMATION ABOUT THE MERGERCOMPANIES

Westamerica Bancorporation

1108 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901

     Westamerica Bancorporation is a California corporation and a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Its legal headquarters are located at 1108 Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, California 94901. Principal administrative offices are located at 4550 Mangels Boulevard in Fairfield, California 94534 and its telephone number is (707) 863-8000. Westamerica Bancorporation provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers through its subsidiary bank, Westamerica Bank. The principal communities served are located in Northern and Central California, from Mendocino, Lake, Colusa and Nevada Counties in the north to Kern County in the south. Westamerica Bancorporation’s strategic focus is on the banking needs of small businesses. In addition, Westamerica Bancorporation also owns 100% of the capital stock of Community Banker Services Corporation, a company engaged in providing Westamerica Bancorporation and its subsidiaries data processing services and other support functions. At June 30, 2004, Westamerica Bancorporation had consolidated assets of approximately $4.6 billion, deposits of approximately $3.5 billion and shareholders’ equity of approximately $329.8 million.

     Additional information about Westamerica Bancorporation and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this document. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” on page 78.

Redwood Empire Bancorp

111 Santa Rosa Avenue
Santa Rosa, California 95404

     Redwood Empire Bancorp is a California corporation and a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, headquartered in Santa Rosa, California. One of its wholly-owned subsidiaries is National Bank of the Redwoods, a national bank which was chartered in 1985. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s business strategy involves two principal business activities which are conducted through National Bank of the Redwoods: community banking and merchant card services. National Bank of the Redwoods provides its core community banking services through five retail branches located in Sonoma County, California, one retail branch located in Mendocino County, California, and one retail branch located in Lake County, California. Redwood Empire Bancorp and its subsidiaries had 159 full-time-equivalent employees at June 30, 2004. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s headquarters are located at 111 Santa Rosa Avenue, Santa Rosa, California 95404-4905, and its telephone number is (707) 573-4800. At June 30, 2004, Redwood Empire Bancorp had consolidated assets of approximately $515.4 million, deposits of approximately $453.0 million and shareholders’ equity of approximately $28.3 million.

     Additional information about Redwood Empire Bancorp and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this document. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” on page 78.

21


GeneralTHE MERGER

The board of directors of Kerman State Bank has approved the merger agreement, which provides for the merger of Kerman State Bank with and into Westamerica Bank. This section of the proxy statement/prospectus describes some aspects of the merger, including the background of the merger and Kerman State Bank’s reasons for the merger.

Background of the mergerMerger

     Kerman State Bank, basedIn recent years, there has been considerable consolidation in Fresno County,the financial institutions industry as well as increasing competition from other providers of financial services. Over the years, Redwood Empire Bancorp’s board of directors has considered its strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value. These strategic alternatives have included continuing as an independent institution, acquiring other small banks and/or establishing or acquiring additional branches within and beyond Redwood Empire Bancorp’s existing geographic reach in California, and entering into a strategic business combination with a similarly-sized or larger institution. With respect to strategic business combinations, from time to time, Redwood Empire Bancorp has conducted general banking operationsreceived unsolicited inquiries regarding a possible acquisition of the company, including previous discussions with Westamerica regarding such a transaction in 1998. In early 2000 and again in early 2002, discussions also took place with two other financial institutions and due diligence materials were provided in each such case; however, prior to serve individuals and smallentering into the merger agreement with Westamerica, none of these inquiries or investigations led to medium-sized businesses since 1983. In serving individuals and small businesses, Kerman State Bank historically has focused on a community-based approach to banking.any definitive acquisition agreement.

     In late 2003 and early 2004, Mr. Eric Hovde, Chairman of Hovde Financial LLC, held discussions with Mr. David Payne, Westamerica’s Chairman and CEO, to discuss Westamerica’s interest in acquiring other financial institutions, including a possible acquisition of Redwood Empire. In the course of these discussions, Mr. Payne advised Mr. Hovde that he was interested in exploring an acquisition of Redwood Empire; Mr. Hovde suggested that Mr. Payne provide a written expression of Westamerica’s interest. On April 2001,8, 2004, Westamerica delivered a written expression of interest based solely upon publicly available information and subject to the successful completion of a due diligence review of Redwood Empire by Westamerica. On April 20, 2004, following a discussion between Mr. Hovde and Mr. Payne, Westamerica indicated a tentative price; this offer was communicated to representatives of Redwood Empire by Hovde.

     On April 27, 2004, Westamerica and Redwood Empire entered into a confidentiality agreement providing for the confidential treatment of non-public information exchanged between the parties and Messrs. Patrick Kilkenny and Dana Johnson, the president and chairman of Redwood Empire, respectively, agreed to meet with Mr. Payne at the offices of Westamerica in Fairfield, California, on May 7, 2004. After the execution of the confidentiality agreement, Redwood Empire provided select nonpublic information to Westamerica. On April 30, 2004, Mr. Johnson, acting pursuant to authority delegated to him as Chairman by the Redwood Empire board of directors, and Hovde agreed to the terms of an agreement pursuant to which Hovde would provide financial advisory services to Redwood Empire; Redwood Empire’s board of directors subsequently ratified the agreement at its special meeting held on August 13, 2004. As scheduled, Messrs. Kilkenny and Johnson met with Mr. Payne on May 7, 2004, at which time the parties exchanged additional nonpublic information. On May 18, 2004, the board of directors of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire met in executive session to discuss Westamerica’s offer and authorized Redwood Empire’s executive management to continue discussions with Westamerica.

     On May 27, 2004, Mr. Payne and Mr. Johnson engaged in further negotiations in light of Westamerica’s review of the servicesnonpublic information provided by Redwood Empire as of James H. Avery Company asthat time and its financial advisor in connection with potential merger or acquisition transactions. James H. Avery Company contacted numerous potential acquirers. Ofassessment of Redwood Empire’s operating performance and prospects. At the conclusion of these institutions three expressed moderate interest. One, Westamerica, initiated serious discussion whilenegotiations, the other two did not.

     In May, 2001, preliminary discussions were held with Westamerica aboutparties agreed on a possible transaction. Upon Westamerica’s executionprice of $28.75 per share. The parties established a schedule for due diligence review and commenced review and negotiation of the terms of a confidentialitymerger agreement. Throughout June, July and a portion of August, 2004, extensive discussions and negotiations occurred between representatives of Redwood Empire and Westamerica concerning, among other things, the terms and conditions of a merger agreement, Westamerica conducted a tentative off-site review of Kerman State Bank. The parties then discontinued discussions.

     They reinitiated discussions in July. On July 10, 2001, Westamerica submitted a non-binding offervarious ancillary agreements, and issues relating to acquire Kerman State Bank. James H. Avery Company reviewed the merits ofenvironmental conditions on the proposalproperty on which Redwood Empire’s headquarters’ office was located and the Kerman State Bank’s boardterms upon which the lessor could put the property to Redwood Empire. During this period of directors determined that a combination with Westamerica might be in the best interest of Kerman State Bank and its shareholders. The board of directors of Kerman State Bank accepted the non-binding offer on July 17, 2001, and Westamerica completed an initial due diligence examination of Kerman State Bank during August, 2001. Westamerica and Kerman State Bank then commenced negotiation of a definitive agreement.

     On December 18, 2001,time, the board of directors of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire met in executive session on June 15, 2004 and on July 20, 2004, to considerdiscuss the results of its tentative evaluation ofpotential transaction with Westamerica and in each instance authorized executive management to continue discussions.

     During the preliminary draftfirst week of a definitive merger agreement. Kerman State Bank’s boardAugust, 2004, the parties discussed the effect of directors determinedcertain merger-related expenses and the risk that Westamerica might be required to move forwarddivest some or all of the deposit liabilities in the Lake

22


County, California market. On August 6, 2004, the parties agreed to reduce the per share price to be paid by Westamerica to the Redwood Empire shareholders to $28.74 to offset in part the cost of certain expenses. On August 10, 2004, the parties agreed that, in the event any deposit liabilities in the Lake County market are required by the regulators to be divested in connection with the negotiations of a final merger, agreement, including the pricing mechanism.

     During January, 2002, an additional financial institution contacted Kerman State Bankper share price to express an interest in acquiring Kerman State Bank. Kerman State Bank met with this institution, which presented a tentative maximum purchase price. Details of the offer were submitted to James H. Avery Company for review and comparisonbe paid to the ongoingRedwood Empire shareholders by Westamerica offer. Resultswould be reduced in an amount ranging from $0.10 per share to $0.30 per share depending on the dollar volume of that analysis indicated that the Westamerica offer had the potential for greater shareholder value, and the Kerman State Bank board of directors electeddeposits required to continue forward with the Westamerica negotiations.be divested.

     Negotiations with Westamerica continued, withOn August 13, 2004, a special meeting of the board of directors of Kerman State Bank meeting on January 15, 2002Redwood Empire Bancorp was held to analyze and again on January 30, 2002. Atconsider the January 30, 2002 meeting, legal counsel reviewed the salient points of theproposed transaction with Westamerica merger agreement and James H. Avery, of James H. Avery Company, reviewed with the board of directors of Kerman State Bank the merits of the proposal, the valuation of the offered stock and the risks involved in the transaction. James H. Avery Company orally issued its opinion that the terms of the Westamerica offer were fairmerger agreement. Representatives of Pillsbury Winthrop LLP, Redwood Empire’s legal advisors, reviewed the fiduciary obligations of the Redwood Empire boards of directors with respect to the shareholdersconsideration of Kerman State Bankthe proposed transaction and reviewed the terms of the transaction and the merger agreement from a legal point of view. At the August 13th special meeting, Hovde summarized certain financial information with respect to Westamerica and the proposed transaction and delivered its written opinion to Redwood Empire, a copy of which is attached to this document as Annex B, that, as of the date of the opinion, the merger consideration contemplated by the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to the shareholders of Redwood Empire. After a general question and later confirmed its opinion in writing. Based ondiscussion period among the analysis presented, Kerman State Bank’smembers of the board of directors, perceivedmanagement, and their financial and legal advisers, the transactionRedwood Empire board of directors met in executive session to be withinfurther discuss the rangeterms of fair prices basedthe proposed transaction. Following the discussion in executive session on recent similar bank

12


transactions and accordingly approvedAugust 13, 2004, the board of directors of Redwood Empire voted unanimously to approve the merger agreement subjectand the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and to satisfactory completionrecommend the approval of due diligence.
the merger agreement to the shareholders of Redwood Empire.

     In February,Following approval of the partiestransaction and the merger agreement by Redwood Empire’s board of directors on August 13, 2004, representatives of Westamerica and Redwood Empire continued to negotiate the retailshold discussions to clarify language in certain provisions of the agreementmerger agreement; discussions also continued with certain directors and addressed personnel, staffing, severanceemployees of Redwood Empire regarding the terms and other issues as they arosescope of non-solicitation and/or non-compete agreements and Kerman State Bank conducted a due diligence examinationunderstandings with certain employees regarding continuation of Westamerica. The partiestheir employment by Westamerica following consummation of the transaction. On August 17, 2004, the board of directors of Redwood Empire met in executive session to receive an update on the progress of the proposed transaction with Westamerica and the proposed timing of the execution of the merger agreement. On August 25, 2004, Redwood Empire and Westamerica executed the merger agreement on February 25, 2002 and madeissued a public announcement ofjoint press release announcing the merger agreement.transaction.

Redwood Empire Bancorp’s Reasons for the merger; recommendation of Kerman State Bank’sMerger

     The board of directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp believes that the transaction and the terms and provisions of the merger agreement are fair to and in the best interest of all shareholders of Redwood Empire. The Redwood Empire Bancorp board of directors unanimously recommends that each shareholder vote to approve the proposed transaction with Westamerica.

     In reaching its decision to adopt and recommend the approval of the merger agreement, the Redwood Empire board considered a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

• the Redwood Empire board’s familiarity with and review of Redwood Empire’s business, operations, financial condition and earnings on an historical and a prospective basis, including, without limitation, its potential growth and profitability;
• the current and prospective economic and competitive environment facing the financial services industry generally, and Redwood Empire in particular, including the continued rapid consolidation in the financial services industry and the competitive effects of the increased consolidation on financial institutions such as Redwood Empire;
• the increasing importance of operational scale and financial resources in maintaining efficiency and remaining competitive over the long term;

23


• the value to be received by holders of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock pursuant to the merger agreement relative to the book value and earnings per share of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock;
• the merger consideration, which is not fixed and may fluctuate depending on the average closing price of Westamerica common stock and possible required deposit divestitures in Lake County, California by banking regulators;
• the risks associated with required regulatory approvals, including the impact of any required divestitures of deposits in Lake County and resulting reduction in the merger consideration;
• the anticipated returns on the shares of Westamerica common stock to be received by Redwood Empire shareholders in the merger;
• the Redwood Empire board’s review, based on the presentation of its financial advisor, of the business, operations, financial condition and earnings of Westamerica on an historical and a prospective basis and of the combined company on a pro forma basis and the historical stock price performance and liquidity of Westamerica common stock, and the resulting relative interests of Redwood Empire shareholders and Westamerica in the common equity of the combined company;
• the financial terms of recent business combinations in the financial services industry and a comparison of the multiples of selected combinations with the terms of the proposed merger with Westamerica;
• the previous experience of management of Westamerica in completing acquisition transactions;
• the general impact that the merger could be expected to have on the constituencies served by Redwood Empire, including its customers, employees and communities;
• the expanded range of banking services that the transaction will allow Redwood Empire to provide to its customers;
• the expectation that the merger would constitute a reorganization under section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and that it would be accounted for as a purchase for accounting and financial reporting purposes;
• the results of the due diligence investigation of Westamerica by management of Redwood Empire and Hovde;
• the Redwood Empire board’s assessment, with the assistance of counsel, concerning the likelihood that Westamerica would obtain all requisite regulatory approvals required for the merger;
• the terms of the $4.5 million termination fee in favor of Westamerica, including the risk that the termination fee might discourage third parties from offering to acquire Redwood Empire by increasing the cost of a third party acquisition, and recognizing that the termination fee was a condition to Westamerica’s willingness to enter into the merger agreement;
• the terms of the $4.5 million termination fee in favor of Redwood Empire if Westamerica enters into a transaction with a third party that, among other things, is not expressly conditioned on, or completion of such a transaction would materially interfere with, the performance by Westamerica of its obligations pursuant to the merger agreement;
• the alternative strategic courses available to Redwood Empire, including remaining independent and exploring other potential business combination transactions;
• the interests of certain directors and executive officers of Redwood Empire in the merger, as described below under the caption “Interests of certain officers and directors in the merger”; and
• the information presented by Hovde to the Redwood Empire board with respect to the merger and the opinion of Hovde that, as of the date of that opinion, the aggregate merger consideration was fair to the holders of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock from a financial point of view.

     The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the board of Redwood Empire is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered. In view of the variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the transaction, including the components of the merger

24


consideration, the board of directors of Redwood Empire did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its determinations and recommendations, and individual directors may have given differing weights to different factors.

Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders holding approximately 49.6% of the outstanding shares have agreed to vote in favor of the merger and have given Westamerica irrevocable proxies to vote their shares in favor of the merger and that directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp, who in the aggregate own approximately 1.0% of the outstanding shares, have also agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger.

Westamerica’s Reasons for the Merger

     Westamerica Bancorporation believes that the merger will provide it with an attractive opportunity to expand its community banking operations in Fresno County.Northern California and to augment its merchant card processing business. Westamerica Bancorporation believes that Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s locations and business mix complement Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s existing presence in Fresno CountyNorthern California and will enable it to offer its broad array of products and services to customers of Kerman State Bank.Redwood Empire Bancorp. Westamerica Bancorporation will reduce expenses by consolidating its office in KermanSanta Rosa with Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s main office.office and by selectively consolidating other Westamerica and Redwood Empire Bancorp branches where consolidation would not be disruptive to customers.

Opinion of Redwood Empire Bancorp’s Financial Advisor

     In determiningHovde Financial LLC has acted as financial advisor to approveRedwood Empire Bancorp in connection with the proposed Westamerica Bancorporation/ Redwood Empire Bancorp merger. Hovde Financial LLC is a nationally recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in transactions similar to the merger agreement and recommend that Kerman State Bank’s shareholders approveis familiar with Redwood Empire Bancorp. As part of its investment banking business, Hovde Financial LLC is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and authorizetheir securities in connection with, among other things, mergers and acquisitions.

     At the merger agreement, the Kerman State BankAugust 13, 2004 Redwood Empire board of directors consultedmeeting, Hovde Financial LLC reviewed the financial aspects of the proposed Westamerica Bancorporation/ Redwood Empire merger with Kerman State Bank’s senior management,the board of directors and rendered an opinion that the consideration to be received by Redwood Empire shareholders in the merger was fair to those shareholders from a financial point of view. Hovde Financial LLC subsequently confirmed its August 13, 2004 opinion by delivery to the Redwood Empire board of directors of a written opinion later that day.

     The full text of Hovde Financial LLC’s written opinion is included in this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex B and is incorporated herein by reference. Redwood Empire shareholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Hovde Financial LLC.

     Hovde Financial LLC’s opinion is directed to the Redwood Empire board of directors and addresses only the fairness, from a financial advisor,point of view, of the aggregate merger consideration to Redwood Empire shareholders. It does not address the underlying business decision to proceed with the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any Redwood Empire shareholder as well asto how such shareholders should vote at the Redwood Empire special meeting on the Westamerica Bancorporation/ Redwood Empire merger agreement or any related matter.

     In rendering its legal counsel, and considered the following material factors:opinion, Hovde Financial LLC:

 • the increased liquidity to be provided to Kerman State Bank’s shareholders by receiving shares of Westamerica common stock in exchange for their shares of Kerman State Bank common stock because Westamerica common stock is listed on the Nasdaq, it has more outstanding shares and shareholders, and the shareholders of Kerman State Bank would have the benefit ofreviewed a more active market for their shares after completiondraft of the acquisition;Westamerica/ Redwood Empire merger agreement, substantially in final form;
 
 • the economic conditionsreviewed certain historical publicly available business and prospects for the markets in which Kerman State Bank operates,financial information concerning Redwood Empire and competitive pressures in the financial services industry in general and the banking industry in particular;
• the enhancement of Kerman State Bank’s competitiveness and its ability to serve its customers, depositors, creditors, other constituents and the communities in which it operates as a result of a business combination with an institution with greater resources, such as Westamerica;
 
 • informationreviewed certain internal financial statements and other financial and operating data concerning Redwood Empire;
• analyzed certain financial projections prepared by the business, resultsmanagement of operations, asset quality andRedwood Empire;

25


• conducted meetings with members of the senior management of Redwood Empire for the purpose of reviewing the future prospects of Redwood Empire, including financial condition of Kerman State Bank and Westamerica on a stand-alone and combined basis,forecasts related to the respective businesses, earnings, assets, liabilities and the future growth prospects followingamount and timing of cost savings and revenue enhancements expected to be achieved as a result of the merger;
 
 • an assessment that, in the current economic environment, expansion through acquisition by another financial institution would be most economically advantageous to Kerman State Bank’s shareholders when compared to other alternatives such as de novo branch openings or branch acquisitions;reviewed historical market prices and trading volumes for Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock and Westamerica Bancorporation common stock;
 
 • evaluated the termspro forma contribution of Redwood Empire’s assets, liabilities, equity and conditions ofearnings to the merger agreement and related agreements;pro forma company;
 
 • reviewed the beneficial effects on Kerman State Bank’s customers;terms of recent merger and acquisition transactions, to the extent publicly available, involving banks and bank holding companies that it considered relevant;
 
 • James H. Avery Company’s analysisanalyzed the pro forma impact of the financial condition, results of operations, business, prospects and stock price of Kerman State Bank and comparison of Kerman State Bank to other banks and bank holding companies operating in its industry;
• an analysis of the terms of other acquisitions in the banking industry;
• the opinion of James H. Avery Company to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion, theWestamerica/ Redwood Empire merger agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Kerman State Bank common stock; and
• the expectation that the acquisition will constitute a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes.

13


     In addition to the advantages, discussed in the previous paragraph, of a merger with a larger financial institution, the board of directors and management of Kerman State Bank also discussed the various risks of combining with Westamerica, including:

• the disadvantages of being part of a larger entity, including the potential for decreased customer service;
• the risk that integration of Kerman State Bank and Westamerica will diverton the combined entities’ management fromcompany’s earnings per share, consolidated capitalization and financial ratios; and performed analyses and considered such other activities; and
• the possible adverse effect on certain employees of Kerman State Bank.factors as it deemed appropriate.

     However, after weighing the advantagesHovde Financial LLC also took into account its assessment of general economic, market and disadvantages of a merger with Westamerica, the Kerman State Bank board of directors determined that the advantages clearly outweighed the disadvantages.

     The above discussion of the factors considered by the Kerman State Bank board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive. In view of the variety and nature of the factors considered by the Kerman State Bank board of directors, the Kerman State Bank board of directors did not find it practicable to assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its decision.

For the reasons stated above, the board of directors of Kerman State Bank unanimously approved the merger agreement and the related transactions, including the merger. The board of directors of Kerman State Bank believes that the merger is fair and in the best interests of Kerman State Bankfinancial conditions and its shareholders. The board of directors of Kerman State Bank unanimously recommends that its shareholders vote “FOR” approval of the merger.

Opinion of Kerman State Bank’s financial advisor

     Kerman State Bank’s board of directors retained James H. Avery Company, pursuant to an engagement letter dated March 5, 2001, to provide financial advisory services for the purposes of analyzing Kerman State Bank’s strategic options including the rendering of a fairness opinion from a financial point of view to Kerman State Bank’s shareholdersexperience in the event of a proposed merger. Kerman State Bank and James H. Avery Company provided this discussion of the review undertaken by James H. Avery Company.

     Kerman State Bank retained James H. Avery Companyother transactions, as investment analysts to determine the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of shares of Kerman State Bank common stock of the consideration to be received by Kerman State Bank in the Westamerica/ Kerman merger. Pursuant to the merger agreement, each holder of shares of Kerman State Bank common stock will receive from Westamerica, in exchange for his or her shares of Kerman State Bank common stock, shares of Westamerica common stock. The transaction is based on a share value for Kerman State Bank of 1.6 times Kerman State Bank’s adjusted equity of $9,861,000 as defined in the merger agreement and subject to certain adjustments based on Kerman State Bank’s level of performing loans, the adequacy of Kerman State Bank’s allowance for loan losses and additional “significant liabilities” (as defined in the merger agreement). The merger agreement states that it is a condition of closing that the aggregate value not be less than $12,500,000. The share value for Kerman State Bank is to be exchanged based on the determined market value per share of Westamerica common stock for each share of Kerman State Bank common stock subject to certain adjustments as described in the merger agreement.

     James H. Avery Company has acted for Kerman State Bank and for the board of directors of Kerman State Bank as financial advisor in this transaction and will receive a fee for its services, including rendering this opinion, equal to 1.50% of the aggregate consideration paid, a significant portion of which is contingent upon the consummation of the merger. James H. Avery Company has previously provided financial advisory services to Kerman State Bank. James H. Avery Company is not a market maker in shares of Kerman State Bank common stock nor do its principals or employees own, directly or indirectly, any shares of Kerman State Bank common stock. Kerman State Bank’s board of directors selected James H. Avery Company to actwell as its financial advisor on the basisknowledge of James H. Avery Company’s expertise and experience in the banking industry since 1968. James H. Avery Company is anand its general experience in securities valuations.

     Hovde Financial LLC assumed, without independent financial advisor to the banking industry in California

14


specializing in capital planning, mergers and acquisitions, the valuation of banks and their securities as well as additional related activities.

     No limitations were imposed by Kerman State Bank on James H. Avery Company in the investigations made or procedures followed in rendering its opinion. James H. Avery Company issued the Kerman State Bank fairness opinion on the consideration to be received by the shareholders of Kerman State Bank pursuant to the merger agreement as fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the shares of Kerman State Bank common stock on February 5, 2002.

     In arriving at the Kerman State Bank fairness opinion, James H. Avery Company has reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the following:

• the merger agreement;
• certain publicly available financial and other data with respect to Kerman State Bank, Westamerica and Westamerica Bank including the consolidated financial statements for recent years and interim periods to December 31, 2001;
• certain other publicly available information concerning Kerman State Bank and Westamerica and internal information concerning Kerman State Bank;
• publicly available information concerning other banks and bank holding companies, the trading markets for their securities and the nature, terms and circumstances of certain other merger transactions James H. Avery Company believed to be relevant, in whole or in part, to its inquiry; and
• evaluations and analysis prepared and presented to the board of directors of Kerman State Bank.

     James H. Avery Company has held discussions with senior management of Kerman State Bank concerning Kerman State Bank’s past and current operations, financial condition and prospects, as well as the results of regulatory examinations. James H. Avery Company has reviewed with senior management of Kerman State Bank various operating projections for Kerman State Bank as a stand-alone entity, assuming the Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger does not occur. Certain pro forma shareholder value comparative projections were derived by James H. Avery Company for Westamerica and for Kerman State Bank as a stand-alone entity based on historical data.

     In conducting the review and in arriving at the Kerman State Bank fairness opinion, James H. Avery Company relied upon and assumedverification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information which wasand representations contained in the materials provided to James H. Avery Company or was publicly available. James H. Avery Company has not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of this information. James H. Avery Company has relied uponit by Redwood Empire and Westamerica and in the management of Kerman State Bank for various operating projectionsdiscussions it had with Redwood Empire and Westamerica managements. Hovde Financial LLC also assumed that suchthe financial forecasts, including without limitation, the synergies and projections reflectregarding under-performing and nonperforming assets and net charge-offs were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimatesinformation and judgments and estimates of Kerman State Bank management. James H. Avery Company has also assumed, without assuming any responsibilityRedwood Empire and Westamerica and that such forecasts will be realized in the amounts and at the times contemplated thereby. Hovde Financial LLC is not an expert in the evaluation of loan and lease portfolios for purposes of assessing the independent verificationadequacy of same, that the allowanceallowances for loan losses ofwith respect thereto. Hovde Financial LLC has assumed that such allowances for Redwood Empire and Westamerica isare in the aggregate adequate to cover its loansuch losses. James H. Avery Company has also assumed, without assumingHovde Financial LLC was not retained to and did not conduct a physical inspection of any responsibility forof the properties or facilities of Redwood Empire or Westamerica. In addition, Hovde Financial LLC did not review individual credit files nor make an independent verificationevaluation or appraisal of same, that there are no active, pending or anticipated legal actions; no under or over market leases or owned fixed asset valuations; or any other under or over-evaluatedthe assets orand liabilities for either Kerman State Bankof Redwood Empire or Westamerica that would significantly change the financial condition for either company.

     James H. Avery Company hasand Hovde Financial LLC was not made or obtainedfurnished with any such evaluations or appraisals of the property of Kerman State Bank or Westamerica, nor has James H. Avery Company examined any individual loan credit files. For purposes of its opinion, James H. Avery Company hasappraisals.

     Hovde Financial LLC assumed that the Westamerica/ Kerman State BankRedwood Empire merger will havewould be consummated substantially in accordance with the tax, accounting and legal effects described in the merger agreement and has assumed the accuracy of the disclosuresterms set forth in the merger agreement. The Kerman State BankHovde Financial LLC also assumed that the merger will be accounted for as a purchase under GAAP. Hovde Financial LLC assumed that the merger is, and will be, in compliance with all laws and regulations that are applicable to Redwood Empire and Westamerica. Hovde Financial LLC further assumed that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory and government approvals, no restriction will be imposed on Westamerica that would have a material adverse effect on Westamerica or the contemplated benefits of the merger. Hovde Financial LLC also assumed that there would not occur any change in applicable law or regulation that would cause a material adverse change in the prospects or operations of Westamerica after the merger.

     Redwood Empire engaged Hovde Financial LLC on April 30, 2004, to provide it with an analysis of its strategic options. Pursuant to its engagement agreement, at the time the Westamerica/ Redwood Empire merger is completed, Redwood Empire will pay Hovde Financial LLC a total fee equal to 1.0% of the merger consideration, plus an initial retainer fee of $20,000 and a fairness opinion is limitedfee of $50,000. Pursuant to the fairness, from a financial point of view,engagement agreement, Redwood Empire also agreed to reimburse Hovde Financial LLC for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in performing its services and to indemnify Hovde Financial LLC against certain liabilities relating to the holdersmerger or Hovde Financial LLC’s engagement.

     Hovde Financial LLC’s opinion is not an expression of an opinion as to the prices at which shares of Kerman State BankWestamerica Bancorporation common stock will trade following the announcement of the aggregate minimum consideration as described inWestamerica Bancorporation/ Redwood Empire merger or the merger agreement and does not address Kerman State Bank’s underlying decision to proceed with the Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger.

15


     James H. Avery Company has considered the financial and other factors, as it has deemed appropriate under the circumstances, including among others the following:

• the historical and current financial positions and results of operations of Kerman State Bank and Westamerica, including interest income, interest expense, net interest income, net interest margin, provision for loan losses, noninterest income, noninterest expense, earnings, dividends, internal capital generation, bookactual value return on assets, return on shareholders’ equity, capitalization, intangible assets, the amount and type of nonperforming assets, and loan losses, all as contained in the financial statements of Kerman State Bank and Westamerica;
• the assets and liabilities of Kerman State Bank and Westamerica, including loan, investment and mortgage portfolios, deposits, other liabilities, historical and current liability sources and costs and liquidity, and
• the nature, terms and conditions regarding other merger transactions involving banks and bank holding companies.

     James H. Avery Company has also taken into account its assessment of economic, market and financial conditions generally and specifically to the markets in which Kerman State Bank and Westamerica operate, as well as its experience in other transactions, in bank securities valuation and its knowledge of the banking industry generally. The Kerman State Bank fairness opinion is necessarily based only upon conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date of the opinion and the information made available to James H. Avery Company through the date of the opinion.Westamerica Bancorporation common

     James H. Avery Company performed financial analysis and peer-group comparisons with Kerman State Bank relating to overall performance, financial condition and market area characteristics. James H. Avery Company analyzed other bank merger and acquisition transactions announced between May 23, 2001 and January 18, 2002 where the seller’s assets were between $50 million and $150 million. This asset size peer group was deemed comparable to the $106 million in assets reported by Kerman State Bank at December 31, 2001. In James H. Avery Company’s opinion, the rural and agricultural nature of Kerman State Bank’s market area and the lack of sufficient recent regional or California transactions in similar markets as Kerman State Bank’s justified analysis of “peer group” banks nationwide. The transactions analyzed and defined in this section of this proxy statement/ prospectus as the “peer group” were: Community Trust Bancorp/ Citizens National Bank and Trust, First Citizens Bancorp/ Independent Community Bancorp, First Community Bancorp/ WHEC Inc. (Capital Bank of North County), Western Sierra Bancorp/ Central California Bank, Mountainbank Financial Corp./ First Western Bank, Umpqua Holdings Corp./ Linn-Benton Bank, Second Bancorp/ Commerce Exchange Corp., NB&T Financial Group/ Sabina Bank, Catawba Valley Bancshares/ First Gaston Bank of North Carolina, First Community Bancorp/ First Charter Bank, N.A., First Federal Capital Corp./ American Community Bankshares, First Banks America Inc./ Charter Pacific Bank, Bank of North Carolina/ Independence Bank (North Carolina), Regions Financial Corp./ Independence Bank (Texas), Pocahontas Bancorp/ Peoples Bank and CVB Financial/ Western Security Bancorp. The analysis of these announced transactions included comparative financial data relating to income, return on assets, return on equity, nonperforming assets, equity to assets, loan loss reserves, purchase price announced as a multiple to book value, purchase price announced as a multiple of the last twelve months of net income, purchase price announced as a multiple of total assets and purchase price announced as a premium for “core deposits” over book value with “core deposits” defined as all domestic deposits less accounts of $100,000 or more. As discussed in this proxy statement/ prospectus, Kerman State Bank’s various financial ratios do not compare favorably with the peer group median ratios in the areas of nonperforming assets to total assets, loan loss reserves to nonperforming assets, loan loss reserves to noncurrent loans, return on equity and return on assets. While adjusted equity as described below mitigates, in part, the ratios related to nonperforming assets and loan loss reserves, based on the peer group medians to Kerman State Bank’s ratios in these and other areas described above, James H. Avery Company’s analysis and judgment was that Kerman State Bank’s value should be lower than the peer group median values.

     At December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank’s total equity was 11.08% of total assets. The range of peer group banks in terms of total equity to total assets was 7.18% to 17.90% with the median at 9.37%. Kerman

1626


State Bank’s adjusted equity, per the Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger agreement, was 9.34% of total assets as of December 31, 2001, a ratio more comparablestock when issued pursuant to the peer group. Adjusted equity permerger or the Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger agreement was calculated to include certain loan write-downs, additions to loan loss reserves and estimates of Kerman State Bank’s costsprices at which the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock will trade following the completion of the proposed transaction.merger.

     At December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank’s nonperforming assets were 4.90% of total assets. The range of peer group banks as to nonperforming assets to total assets was 0.00% to 2.37% with the median at 0.49%. Nonperforming assets represent potential loss to banking institutions. Kerman State Bank’s ratio of such assets was outside the range for the peer group and 10.0 times the median.

     At December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank’s loan loss reserves represented 25.09% of nonperforming assets, 50.80% of nonperforming loans and 2.02% to total loans. In calculating adjusted equity per the Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger agreement, an increase in Kerman State Bank’s loan loss reserves was included which would increase these respective ratios to 46.40%, 93.93% and 3.74%. The range of peer group banks as to loan loss reserves to nonperforming assets was 45.26% to 4,586.67% with one bank having no nonperforming loans and with the median at 270.49%. In this comparison, the lowest peer group bank reserve level was 1.8 times Kerman State Bank’s reserve and the median was 10.8 times Kerman State Bank’s reserve. If Kerman State Bank’s reserve were increased as contemplated to reach the agreed amount of adjusted equity, the lowest peer group ratio and median peer group ratio would be 1.0 times and 5.8 times Kerman State Bank’s ratio.

     The range of peer group banks for loan loss reserves to noncurrent loans was 45.26% to 4,586.67% with one bank having no noncurrent loans and with the median at 286.91%. In this comparison, the lowest peer group bank reserve ratio was 0.9 times Kerman State Bank’s and the median was 5.6 times Kerman State Bank’s. If Kerman State Bank’s reserve were increased as contemplated to reach the agreed amount of adjusted equity, the lowest peer group ratio and median peer group ratio would be 0.5 times and 3.1 times Kerman State Bank’s ratio.

     The range of peer group banks for loan loss reserves to total loans was 0.91% to 4.91% with the median at 1.33%. In this comparison, the median was 0.7 times Kerman State Bank’s. The peer group median was 0.4 times Kerman State Bank’s based on the increase in reserves per the Kerman State Bank/ Westamerica adjusted equity agreement.

     At December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank’s return on equity was 8.19% for the year, 2001. The range of peer group banks as to last twelve months net income to equity was -33.42% to +15.53% with the median at 10.53%. In this comparison, the median was 1.3 times Kerman State Bank’s. Based on adjusted equity per the Kerman State Bank/ Westamerica merger agreement, Kerman State Bank’s December 31, 2001 return on equity ratio is 9.33% and the peer group median is 1.1 times Kerman State Bank’s.

     At December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank’s return on assets was 0.87% for the year, 2001. The range of peer group banks as to last twelve months net income to assets was -3.02% to +1.77% with the median at 0.96%. In this comparison, the peer group median was 1.1 times Kerman State Bank’s.

     James H. Avery Company’s opinion is that the size and growth of a particular market area relates to the value of those banks operating in that market. Kerman State Bank’s headquarters city, the City of Kerman, had total FDIC-insured deposits in all FDIC-insured facilities, including Kerman State Bank’s, of $166 million at June 30, 2001 and such deposits had declined by 0.7% from June 30, 2000. The range of peer group banks as to headquarters city total FDIC-insured deposits (including the deposits of respective peer group banks) was $43 million to $11.0 billion with the median at $529 million. In this comparison, the median was 3.2 times Kerman State Bank’s.

     The range of peer group banks as to headquarters city FDIC-insured deposit growth from June 30, 2000 to June 30, 2001 was -12.03% to +17.68% with the median at +8.13%. Of the twelve peer group banks, two were headquartered in cities that had negative deposit growth and ten were headquartered in cities that had positive deposit growth.

17


     James H. Avery Company determined that no transaction reviewed was identical to the subject transaction and that, accordingly, any analysis of comparable transactions necessarily involves subjective considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial, operating and market characteristics of the parties to the transactions being compared.

     Set forth below is a brief summary of the considerations related to the fairness opinion rendered on February 5, 2002.

Multiple of Book Value Method. This valuation approach is formulated on the announced purchase prices and multiples of book values based on the announced transactions of Kerman State Bank’s asset-size peer group.

     The peer group multiple factor ranged from 1.19 to 2.18 with the median at 1.58. The multiple of book value is but one methodology utilized in the determination of overall market value of Kerman State Bank. Utilizing the Multiple of Book Value Method (based on Kerman State Bank’s adjusted book value per the merger agreement) the acquisition value, as of the Kerman State Bank fairness opinion report date, is as follows:

$9,861,000 (adjusted book value per agreement) × 1.58 (the peer group median) = $15,580,000

Multiple of Income Method. This valuation approach is formulated on the announced purchase prices and multiples of net income over the previous twelve months based on announced transactions of Kerman State Bank’s asset-size peer group. Such income data for Kerman State Bank was based on call report data through December 31, 2001.

     The peer group multiple factor ranged from 12.64 to 43.57 with the median at 19.81. The multiple of income is but one methodology utilized in the determination of overall market value of Kerman State Bank. Utilizing the Multiple of Income Method (based on Kerman State Bank’s twelve-month income through December 31, 2001) the acquisition value, as of the Kerman State Bank fairness opinion report date, is as follows:

$920,000 (last twelve months income) × 19.81 (the peer group median) = $18,225,000

Percentage of Total Assets Method. This valuation approach is formulated on the announced purchase prices as a percentage of total assets based on the announced transactions of Kerman State Bank’s asset-size peer group. Such asset data for Kerman State Bank was based on call report data as of December 31, 2001.

     The peer group percentage factor ranged from 10.25% to 24.16% with the median at 15.61%. The percentage of total assets is but one methodology utilized in the determination of overall market value of Kerman State Bank. Utilizing the Percentage of Total Assets Method (based on Kerman State Bank’s total assets as of December 31, 2001) the acquisition value, as of the Kerman State Bank fairness opinion report date, is as follows:

$105,535,000 (as of December 31, 2001) × .1561 (the peer group median) = $16,474,000

Core Deposits Premium over Book Value Method. This valuation approach is formulated on the announced purchase prices and the percentage premium paid for core deposits over the book value based on the announced transactions of Kerman State Bank’s asset-size peer group. Core deposits are all domestic bank deposits excluding accounts in excess of $100,000. Such deposit data for Kerman State Bank was based on call report data as of December 31, 2001.

     The peer group premium on core deposits ranged from 2.49% to 22.52% with the median at 9.50%. The core deposits premium is but one methodology utilized in the determination of overall market value of Kerman State Bank. Utilizing the Core Deposits Premium over Book Value Method (based on Kerman State Bank’s adjusted book value as per the merger agreement and its core deposits as of December 31, 2001) the acquisition value, as of the Kerman State Bank fairness opinion report date is as follows:

$54,617,000 (core deposits as of December 31, 2001) × .0950 (the peer group median = $5,189,000

plus $9,861,000 (adjusted book value) = $15,050,000

18


Consideration of Discounted Cash Flow Method. James H. Avery Company did not employ the discounted cash flow method in its analysis of the proposed Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger even though it is aware that the discounted cash flow method is a commonly used valuation methodology. James H. Avery Company believes that the provided methodologies proved adequate for determining the fairness of the consideration to Kerman State Bank’s shareholders from a financial standpoint.

Valuation Summary using Median Comparative Values.

      
Total Value

Multiple of Book Value Method $15,580,000 
Multiple of Income Method $18,225,000 
Percentage of Total Assets Method $16,474,000 
Core Deposits Premium over Book Value Method $15,050,000 
 Mean Average $16,332,000 
 Median Average $16,027,000 

     As previously noted, financial comparisons of Kerman State Bank to the peer-group ratios indicate that the Kerman State Bank valuation be somewhat below the peer group median valuations.

     In performing its analyses, James H. Avery CompanyHovde Financial LLC made numerous assumptions aboutwith respect to industry performance, general business, economic, market and economicfinancial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Kerman State Bank or Westamerica. TheHovde Financial LLC, Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire. Any estimates contained in the analyses performed by Hovde Financial LLC are not necessarily indicative of actual values or actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by thosethese analyses. The analyses were prepared solely as part of James H. Avery Company’s analysis as to the fairnessAdditionally, estimates of the consideration to holdersvalue of shares of Kerman State Bank common stock in the Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger. The analysesbusinesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which Kerman State Bank might actuallysuch businesses or securities may be soldsold. Accordingly, these analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty. In addition, the Hovde Financial LLC opinion was among several factors taken into consideration by the Redwood Empire board in making its determination to approve the merger agreement and the merger. Consequently, the analyses described below should not be viewed as solely determinative of the decision of the Redwood Empire board or Redwood Empire management with respect to the fairness of the merger consideration.

     The following is a summary of the material analyses presented by Hovde Financial LLC to the Redwood Empire board on August 13, 2004, in connection with its opinion. The summary is not a complete description of the analyses underlying the Hovde Financial LLC opinion or the presentation made by Hovde Financial LLC to the Redwood Empire board, but summarizes the material analyses performed and presented in connection with such opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytic process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis in the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Hovde Financial LLC did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor that it considered, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. The analyses and the summary of the analyses must be considered as a whole and selecting portions of the analyses and factors or focusing on the information presented below in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying the analyses and opinion of Hovde Financial LLC. The tables alone are not a complete description of the financial analyses.

Statement of Offer Analysis. Hovde Financial LLC compared the offer value to Redwood Empire’s trailing twelve-months GAAP net income, MRQ earnings annualized, YTD earnings annualized, 2004 calendar-year estimated GAAP net income (as estimated by Redwood Empire), book value, tangible book value, tangible book value to core deposits premium, and premium-to-market of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock. Based on the price per share of $28.74 for Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock, and taking into consideration the in-the-money value of Redwood Empire options resulting in an aggregate offer value of $147,959,445 (in case of a Lake County Divestiture the implied maximum price adjustment for Redwood Empire would be a price per share of $28.44 for Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock, and taking into consideration the in-the-money value of Redwood Empire options resulting in an aggregate offer value of $146,370,702), Hovde Financial LLC observed that the implied transaction multiples to Redwood Empire were as follows:

         
Maximum
Potential Price
Deal Value CalculationCurrent TermsAdjustment



Total Deal Value(Actual)
 $147,959,444.79  $146,370,702.39 
Deal Value per Share $28.74  $28.44 

27


             
Jun. 30, 2004AcquisitionAcquisition
Price-to-Earnings MultiplesDataMultipleMultiple




LTM Earnings $6,991   21.2x  20.9x 
MRQ Earnings Annualized ($1.85 million) $7,404   20.0x  19.8x 
YTD Earnings Annualized ($3.53 million) $7,078   20.9x  20.7x 
12/31/04 Budgeted Earnings $8,191   18.1x  17.9x 
Price-to-Book Value
            
Total Common Equity $28,268   523.42%  517.80%
Price-to-Tangible Book Value
            
Total Goodwill $674         
Total Tangible Equity $27,594   536.20%  530.44%
Price-to-Tangible Book Value Core Deposit Premium
            
% of Jumbo Deposits  16.04%        
Total Deposits $453,043         
Total Core Deposits (excluding jumbo deposits) $380,375   31.64%  31.23%
Premium-to-Market Analysis
            
REBC Stock Price $24.52   17.21%  15.99%
REBC Stock Price — 20-Day Average $24.02   19.65%  18.40%

Premium to Market Analysis Based on Redwood Empire’s Historical Trading Valuation. Hovde Financial LLC reviewed the merger consideration premium to Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock price at different intervals during the period commencing January 6, 2004, using the 5-day, 10-day, 20-day, 30-day, 45-day, 60-day and 90-day average closing price of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock during such period. Using such average closing prices, Hovde observed that the premium to Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock was as follows:

         
Redwood EmpirePremium to
AverageAverage
Closing PriceTrading Price


Last trading day $24.52   17.21%
Last 5 Trading Days $24.56   17.02%
Last 10 Trading Days $24.30   18.27%
Last 20 Trading Days $24.07   19.40%
Last 30 Trading Days $23.96   19.95%
Last 45 Trading Days $23.78   20.86%
Last 60 Trading Days $23.86   20.45%
Last 90 Trading Days $24.51   17.26%

Using such average closing prices, Hovde Financial LLC observed that the premium to Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock based on the maximum potential price adjustment for the Lake County Divestiture was as follows:

         
Redwood EmpirePremium to
AverageAverage
Closing PriceTrading Price


Last trading day $24.52   15.99%
Last 5 Trading Days $24.56   15.80%
Last 10 Trading Days $24.30   17.04%
Last 20 Trading Days $24.07   18.16%
Last 30 Trading Days $23.96   18.70%
Last 45 Trading Days $23.78   19.60%
Last 60 Trading Days $23.86   19.20%
Last 90 Trading Days $24.51   16.03%

28


Stock Trading History Analysis. Hovde Financial LLC reviewed the history of the reported trading prices of Redwood Empire’s common stock and Westamerica Bancorporation’s common stock and the relationship between the movements in the prices of Redwood Empire’s common stock and Westamerica Bancorporation’s common stock to movements in certain stock indices, including the NASDAQ Bank and Thrift Index, the Russell 2000 Financial Services Index, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, and the DJIA. Hovde Financial LLC noted that during the one-year period ended August 2, 2004, Redwood Empire’s common stock underperformed the NASDAQ Bank and Thrift Index, the Russell 2000 Financial Services Index, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the DJIA. Within the same one-year period, Hovde Financial LLC observed that Westamerica Bancorporation’s common stock outperformed the NASDAQ Bank and Thrift Index, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the DJIA and underperformed the Russell 2000 Financial Services Index. Hovde concluded by stating that Westamerica’s common stock outperformed Redwood Empire’s common stock from August 2, 2003 to August 2, 2004.

         
Beginning IndexEnding Index
Value onValue on
August 2, 2003August 2, 2004


Redwood Empire  100.00%  103.03%
Westamerica Bancorporation  100.00%  115.96%
Nasdaq Bank and Thrift Index  100.00%  114.06%
Russell 2000 Financial Services Index  100.00%  116.58%
S&P 500 Index  100.00%  112.60%
DJIA  100.00%  110.81%

Hovde Financial LLC noted that during the five-year period ended August 2, 2004, Redwood Empire’s common stock outperformed the NASDAQ Bank and Thrift Index, the Russell 2000 Financial Services Index, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the DJIA. Within the same five-year period, Hovde observed that Westamerica’s common stock outperformed the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the DJIA and underperformed the NASDAQ Bank and Thrift Index and the Russell 2000 Financial Services Index. Hovde Financial LLC concluded by stating that Redwood Empire’s common stock outperformed Westamerica’s common stock from August 2, 1999 to August 2, 2004.

         
Beginning IndexEnding Index
Value onValue on
August 2, 1999August 2, 2004


Redwood Empire  100.00%  252.26%
Westamerica Bancorporation  100.00%  150.93%
Nasdaq Bank and Thrift Index  100.00%  157.40%
Russell 2000 Financial Services Index  100.00%  153.02%
S&P 500 Index  100.00%  83.33%
DJIA  100.00%  95.62%

Selected Transaction Analysis. As part of its analysis, Hovde Financial LLC reviewed comparable mergers involving banks located in California (the “California Merger Group”) announced since January 1, 2004, in which the seller had assets between $100 million and $1.25 billion, the Western Region (the “Western Region Group”) announced since January 1, 2003, in which the seller had assets between $150 million and $1.25 billion, and Nationwide (the “Nationwide Merger Group”) announced since January 1, 2004, in which the seller had assets between $400 million and $1.0 billion.

29


The California Merger Group consisted of the following 15 transactions:

Buyer Short NameSeller Short Name


American River BanksharesBank of Amador
Community Bancorp Inc.Cuyamaca Bank NA
Boston Private FinancialEncino State Bank
BNP Paribas GroupUSDB Bancorp
North Valley BancorpYolo Community Bank
Umpqua Holdings Corp.Humboldt Bancorp
Hanmi Financial Corp.Pacific Union Bank
First Community BancorpHarbor National Bank
Pacific Capital BancorpPacific Crest Capital
UnionBanCal Corp.Business Bancorp
Humboldt BancorpCalifornia Independent
Boston Private FinancialFirst State Bancorp
1867 Western Financial Corp.Central Valley Bancorp
First Community BancorpVerdugo Banking Company
Western Sierra BancorpCentral Sierra Bank

The Western Merger Group consisted of the following 13 transactions:

Buyer Short NameSeller Short Name


Boston Private FinancialEncino State Bank
Columbia Banking System Inc.Bank of Astoria
BNP Paribas GroupUSDB Bancorp
Umpqua Holdings Corp.Humboldt Bancorp
Heartland Financial USA Inc.Rocky Mountain Bancorp
Hanmi Financial Corp.Pacific Union Bank
First Community BancorpHarbor National Bank
Pacific Capital BancorpPacific Crest Capital
UnionBanCal Corp.Business Bancorp
Humboldt BancorpCalifornia Independent
Boston Private FinancialFirst State Bancorp
1867 Western Financial Corp.Central Valley Bancorp
First Community BancorpVerdugo Banking Company

The Nationwide Merger Group consisted of the following 8 transactions:

Buyer Short NameSeller Short Name


Fulton Financial Corp.First Washington Financial
National City Corp.Wayne Bancorp Inc.
Southwest Bancorp. of TexasKlein Bancshares Inc.
TierOne Corp.United Nebraska Financial
South Financial Group Inc.Florida Banks Inc.
Sun Bancorp Inc.Community Bancorp of NJ
BMO Financial GroupNew Lenox Holding Co.
South Financial Group Inc.CNB Florida Bancshares Inc.

     Hovde Financial LLC calculated the medians for the following relevant transaction ratios in the California Merger Group, the Western Merger Group, and the Nationwide Merger Group:

• the multiple of the merger consideration to the acquired company’s earnings for the 12 months preceding the announcement date of the transaction;

30


• the tangible book value premium to core deposits;
• the multiple of the merger consideration to the acquired company’s book value; and
• the multiple of the merger consideration to the acquired company’s tangible book value.

Hovde Financial LLC used the medians of these multiples for the California Merger Group, the Western Merger Group, and the Nationwide Merger Group to estimate an implied transaction value involving Redwood Empire. These values and the corresponding multiples were then compared to the value of the consideration expressed in the merger agreement. In calculating the multiples for the merger, Hovde Financial LLC used earnings for the last twelve months at which any securities may tradeJune 30, 2004, core deposits (total deposits net of CDs greater than $100,000) and common equity and tangible equity for Redwood Empire. The table below shows the results of this analysis comparing the multiples based on the merger agreement versus the implied multiples to Redwood Empire based on the medians of the corresponding group’s multiples.

                     
Tangible
ImpliedLTMBook Prem.
AggregateNetto CoreCommonTangible
Deal ValueIncomeDepositsEquityEquity





(In millions)
Redwood (Stated) $148.00   21.2x  31.64%  523.42%  536.20%
Redwood (Potential Divestiture) $146.40   20.9x  31.23%  517.80%  530.44%
California Merger Group     22.3x  18.52%  257.61%  265.92%
Western Merger Group     20.6x  19.01%  257.61%  265.92%
Nationwide Merger Group     23.3x  19.86%  311.92%  313.92%

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Hovde Financial LLC estimated the discounted present value of Redwood Empire by using estimated 2004-2008 aggregate GAAP earnings (which estimates were prepared by Hovde Financial LLC) of $8.1 million, $9.0 million, $9.9 million, $10.9 million and $11.9 million, respectively, and 2004-2008 annual dividends of $4.1 million, $4.5 million, $5.0 million, $5.5 million and $6.0 million, respectively. In arriving at the terminal value of Redwood Empire’s earnings stream at the end of 2008, Hovde Financial LLC assumed a terminal earnings value multiple at a range of 14.0, 15.0, 16.0, 17.0 and 18.0. The terminal values were then discounted, along with annual dividends for 2004-2008, using a range of discount rates of 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0% and 15.0% to arrive at the present timevalue for Redwood Empire. These rates and values were chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding the required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock. These analyses and their underlying assumptions yielded a range of value for Redwood Empire of approximately $99.8 million to $140.1 million based on the earnings approach.

Financial Implications to Redwood Empire Shareholders. Hovde Financial LLC prepared an analysis of the financial implications to the holders of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock. This analysis indicated the level of accretion to estimated cash earnings per share, GAAP earnings per share, book value per share, tangible book value per share and dividends per share that a stockholder of Redwood Empire would achieve on a pro forma equivalent basis, assuming a Redwood Empire share is converted entirely into Westamerica common stock. The table below summarizes these results:

                     
% Accretion — Dilution (Stated Offer)

20042005200620072008





Cash Earnings per Share  8.9%  8.7%  17.2%  26.3%  36.4%
GAAP Earnings per Share  6.9%  6.8%  15.6%  25.0%  35.3%
Book Value per Share  32.0%  33.3%  35.8%  39.3%  43.9%
Tangible Book Value per Share  (3.4)%  3.0%  9.7%  16.9%  24.4%
Dividends per Share  (24.9)%  (25.1)%  (19.4)%  (12.4)%  (5.5)%

31


                     
% Accretion — Dilution (Potential Divestiture)

20042005200620072008





Cash Earnings per Share  7.8%  7.5%  16.0%  24.9%  35.0%
GAAP Earnings per Share  5.8%  5.7%  14.3%  23.7%  33.8%
Book Value per Share  30.3%  31.7%  34.1%  37.7%  42.2%
Tangible Book Value per Share  (4.3)%  2.0%  8.7%  15.7%  23.2%
Dividends per Share  (25.7)%  (25.9)%  (20.3)%  (13.3)%  (6.5)%

Comparative Shareholder Rates of Return. Hovde Financial LLC presented an analysis of comparative theoretical shareholder returns in several scenarios, including (i) Redwood Empire remaining independent; (ii) Redwood Empire being acquired in 2008; (iii) Redwood Empire merging with Westamerica Bancorporation under the terms of the agreement; and (iv) Redwood Empire merging with Westamerica Bancorporation under the terms of the agreement (assuming a Redwood Empire share is converted entirely into Westamerica Bancorporation common stock) and the pro forma company in turn being acquired in 2008. This analysis, which was based on the net present value of projected dividend streams and projected common stock valuations, using historical operating and acquisition price-to-earnings and price-to-book value multiples, indicated total shareholder returns of 16.77% if Redwood Empire remained independent, 20.00% if Redwood Empire were acquired in 2008, 42.72% (42.68% if a maximum potential divestiture were to occur) if Redwood Empire merged with Westamerica Bancorporation, and 50.62% (50.59% if a maximum potential divestiture were to occur) if Redwood Empire merged with Westamerica and the pro forma company in turn were acquired in 2008.

Contribution Analysis. Hovde Financial LLC prepared a contribution analysis showing percentages of assets, loans, deposits, equity and tangible equity at June 30, 2004, the LTM net income and the estimated 2004 net income on GAAP basis that would be contributed to the combined company on a pro forma basis by Redwood Empire and Westamerica. These contribution percentages were compared to the approximately 5.08% (under the current structure or 5.03% under the maximum potential price adjustment for the divestiture) and 8.19% (assumes all Redwood Empire shares are converted entirely into Westamerica common stock or 8.11% under the maximum potential price adjustment for the divestiture) of the pro forma common shares outstanding that holders of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock would own.

         
Redwood EmpireWestamerica
ContributionContribution


Balance Sheet
        
Assets  10.05%  89.95%
Net Loans  15.55%  84.45%
Deposits  11.44%  88.56%
Common Equity  7.89%  92.11%
Tangible Common Equity  8.23%  91.77%
Income Statement
        
LTM Net Income — GAAP  6.70%  93.30%
2004 Calendar-year Estimated Net Income — GAAP  7.52%  92.48%

Comparison Analysis of Westamerica and Selected Publicly Traded Reference Companies. As part of its analysis, Hovde Financial LLC reviewed and compared publicly available financial data, market information and trading multiples for Westamerica with 10 other selected publicly traded bank holding

32


reference companies that were based in the future.Western Region with assets between $1 billion and $10 billion (the “Western Peer Group”).
Institution NameTickerState



Bank of Hawaii CorporationBOHHI
CVB Financial Corp. CVBFCA
East West Bancorp, Inc. EWBCCA
First Community BancorpFCBPCA
Frontier Financial CorporationFTBKWA
Greater Bay BancorpGBBKCA
Mid-State BancsharesMDSTCA
Pacific Capital BancorpPCBCCA
UCBH Holdings, Inc. UCBHCA
Umpqua Holdings CorporationUMPQOR

     A representativeFor the Western Peer Group, Hovde Financial LLC analyzed, among other things, stock price as a multiple of James H. Avery Company participatedearnings for the last twelve months, and estimated fiscal year 2004 earnings per share, book value per share, and tangible book value per share. All multiples were based on closing stock prices as of August 2, 2004. Estimated earnings per share for the reference companies were based on First Call consensus estimates. The following table sets forth the median and average multiples indicated by the market analysis of the Western Peer Group:

                             
Price/Price/Price/Price/
StockBookTang. BkLTM2004E
PriceValueValueEPSEPS
Institution NameTickerState($)(%)(%)(x)(x)








Bank of Hawaii Corporation  BOH   HI   45.560   341.53   360.18   16.6   15.4 
CVB Financial Corp.  CVBF   CA   20.880   359.38   396.52   18.6   17.4 
East West Bancorp, Inc.  EWBC   CA   34.350   408.44   447.82   25.4   23.7 
First Community Bancorp  FCBP   CA   40.260   185.44   NA   19.7   18.2 
Frontier Financial Corporation  FTBK   WA   33.890   270.90   278.65   15.7   15.0 
Greater Bay Bancorp  GBBK   CA   26.090   214.20   332.64   16.1   14.9 
Mid-State Bancshares  MDST   CA   24.460   210.86   265.86   17.1   16.9 
Pacific Capital Bancorp  PCBC   CA   27.820   292.23   NA   15.0   14.5 
UCBH Holdings, Inc.  UCBH   CA   39.100   402.68   514.61   24.4   22.5 
Umpqua Holdings Corporation  UMPQ   OR   22.830   200.09   396.62   18.7   17.3 
   Average           288.58   374.11   18.7   17.6 
   Median           281.57   378.35   17.9   17.1 
Westamerica Bancorporation
  WABC   CA   50.940   490.75   526.11   19.4   17.5 

     No company used as comparison in the January 30, 2002 meetingabove analysis is identical to Westamerica Bancorporation. Accordingly, an analysis of these results is not mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the boardcompanies.

Other Factors and Analyses. Hovde Financial LLC took into consideration various other factors and analyses, including but not limited to: historical market prices and trading volumes for Westamerica Bancorporation’s common stock; movements in the common stock of directors of Kerman State Bankselected publicly traded companies; movements in the S&P 500 Index and provided a verbal summarythe NASDAQ Composite Index; and analyses of the Kerman State Bank fairness opinion. James H. Avery Company providedweighted average costs of capital of selected publicly traded companies.

     Based upon the written Kerman State Bank fairnessforegoing analyses and other investigations and assumptions set forth in its opinion, dated February 5, 2002 regardingwithout giving specific weightings to any one factor or comparison, Hovde Financial LLC determined that the fairness,aggregate merger consideration was fair from a financial point of view to the Redwood Empire shareholders.

33


Information Regarding Hovde Financial LLC

     The Redwood Empire board of directors selected Hovde Financial LLC to act as its financial advisor and render a fairness opinion regarding the proposed merger because Hovde Financial LLC is a nationally recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in transactions similar to the proposed merger and because it is familiar with Redwood Empire, its business and its industry. Hovde Financial LLC is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities and private placements.

Pursuant to a letter agreement dated April 30, 2004, in addition to the $20,000 Initial Retainer and the $50,000 Fairness Opinion Fee, Redwood Empire has agreed to pay Hovde Financial LLC a financial advisory fee at closing of the considerationproposed merger equal to be received by Kerman State Bank1.0 percent of the aggregate value of the merger consideration. In addition, Redwood Empire has agreed to reimburse Hovde Financial LLC for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, subject to certain limitations, and to indemnify Hovde Financial LLC and certain related persons against certain liabilities arising out of or in conjunction with its rendering of services under its engagement, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws. In the ordinary course of its business, Hovde Financial LLC may actively trade in the proposed Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger, based onsecurities of Redwood Empire or Westamerica for its own account and the information then available. Asaccounts of February 5, 2002, James H. Avery Company is of the opinion that the consideration to be received by Kerman State Bank shareholdersits customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in the proposed Westamerica/ Kerman State Bank merger is fair, from a financial standpoint.

A copy of the fairness opinion of James H. Avery Company, dated as of February 5, 2002, which sets forth certain assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review undertaken by James H. Avery Company, is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement/prospectus. Shareholders of Kerman State Bank are urged to read the fairness opinion in its entirety.such securities.

Regulatory approvals requiredApprovals Required

     The merger is subject to approval by the FRB under the Bank Merger Act. This law provides that no transaction may be approved whichthat would result in a monopoly or whichthat would be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or to attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any part of the United States, or the effect of which in any section of the country may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly or which in any other manner might restrain trade, unless it is determined that the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed in the public interest by the probable effect of the transaction in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served. In conducting a review of any application for approval, the FRB is required to consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the banks concerned, their compliance with laws intended to detect and combat money laundering, and the convenience and needs of the community to be served. An

19


application may be denied if it is determined that the financial or managerial resources of the acquiring entity are inadequate.

     A transaction approved by the FRB may not be consummated for 1530 days after the approval. The FRB may reduce the waiting period to 15 days if the Department of Justice has not provided comment on the application. During this waiting period, the Department of Justice may commence legal action challenging the transaction under the antitrust laws. If, however, the Justice Department does not commence a legal action during the 15-daywaiting period, it may not thereafter challenge the transaction except in an action commenced under the antimonopoly provisions of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

     The Bank Merger Act provides for the publication of notice and the opportunity for administrative hearings relating to the applications for approval and authorize the FRB to permit interested parties to intervene in the proceedings. If an interested party is permitted to intervene, intervention could substantially delay the regulatory approvals required for consummation of the merger.

     The merger must also be approved by the California Commissioner of Financial Institutions under the California Financial Code. The factors that the Commissioner will consider in determining whether to grant its approval include the competitive effects of the merger, the convenience and needs of the community, Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s financial condition, the fairness of the merger to the depositors, creditors and shareholders of the parties and the competence, experience and integrity of Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s management.

     One factor considered by the FRB under the Bank Merger Act is the probable effect of the proposed merger on competition for banking services in the communities served by the two banks. Westamerica Bank and National Bank of the Redwoods together hold approximately 33% of all FDIC-insured deposits in Lake

34


County. Under tests used by the FRB and the Department of Justice to measure effects on competition, the percentage of deposits that Westamerica would hold in Lake County following completion of the merger in relation to the number of remaining depository institutions and their relative market shares may exceed levels permitted by the FRB and the Department of Justice, unless Westamerica can demonstrate mitigating factors in current competition or promises to mitigate the effect of the merger by divesting certain deposits in Lake County.

     Based on current precedents, Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp and Westamerica Bancorporation believe that the merger will be approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies and will not be subject to challenge by the Department of Justice under the antitrust laws. However, no assurance can be provided that the regulatory agencies or the Department of Justice will concur in this assessment or that any approval by the regulatory agencies will not contain conditions which are materially burdensome to Kerman StateRedwood Empire Bancorp or Westamerica Bancorporation or that those agencies will not effectively require Westamerica to divest some or all of the deposits of National Bank or Westamerica.of the Redwoods in Lake County. Such divestiture could cause the merger consideration to be reduced by up to $0.30 per share.

Nasdaq listingListing

     The shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock to be issued in the merger will be included for listing on Nasdaq.

Interests of certainCertain Officers and Directors in the Merger

     In considering the recommendation of the Redwood Empire Bancorp board of directors with respect to the merger agreement, you should be aware that the executive officers and directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp have interests in the merger and have arrangements that are different from, or in addition to, those of the Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders generally. The Redwood Empire Bancorp board of directors was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decisions to approve the merger agreement and to recommend that the Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders vote in favor of the merger agreement.

     Share ownership. As of April 15, 2002,[record date], 2004, the record date, the directors and executive officers of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp beneficially owned an aggregate of 308,328202,884 shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock (including 11,000154,059 shares subject to presently exercisable options).

     Stock option plans. As a result of the execution of the merger agreement, all outstanding stock options under Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s stock option planplans shall be immediatelybecome vested and exercisable to the extent that the terms of the Kerman State Bank option plan provide for such acceleration and if the holder of such options has not terminated his or her employment with Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp before the effective date of the merger agreement.merger. Any options not exercised prior to completion of the merger will be converted into options to purchase Westamerica Bancorporation common stock on economically equivalent terms.

35


Robert Wheeler’s compensation agreement.The employment agreement for Robert Wheeler,following chart shows the Presidentnumber of Kerman State Bank, provides that in casevested and unvested options held by each director and executive officer of a change in controlRedwood Empire Bancorp as of the bank,record date for the surviving company will be bound by Mr. Wheeler’s employment agreement. “Change in control” includes ameeting, the value of these options assuming merger in which Kerman State Bank is notconsideration of $28.74 per share, and the surviving company. Mr. Wheeler’s agreement also providesvalue of the unvested options that if, duringare accelerated due to the twelve month period following the Merger, Mr. Wheeler terminates his employment following a reduction in his duties or title, he will be eligible to receive a single payment equal to six months of his then current base salary, plus any incentive bonus prorated for a partial year of employment.merger:

                     
Unvested SharesValue of Unvested
Included in theOptions Accelerated
Total SharesTotal SharesWeightedValue of Optionsas a Result of
Subject toSubject toAverageat $28.74the Merger at
NameOptionsOptionsExercise Priceper Share$28.74 per Share






John H. Brenengen  6,250   3,437  $16.88  $74,125  $40,762 
Stephen A. Fleming  50,000   37,500   25.41   166,500   124,875 
Dana R. Johnson  26,160   7,664   12.55   423,530   124,080 
Patrick W. Kilkenny  76,500      5.55   1,774,035    
Mark H. Rodebaugh  4,750   3,625   20.17   40,707   31,066 
Gregory J. Smith  19,150   6,568   13.29   295,867   101,475 
William B. Stevenson  51,250   3,437   7.32   1,097,775   73,620 
David B. Warner  1,000   1,000   23.00   5,740   5,740 
Kim C. McClaran  1,500   750   20.03   13,065   6,532 

     Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s director severance policy and severance agreements.policy. Under Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s director severance policy, Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp has agreed to pay a severance benefit equal to one week’s salary foryear of fees to each full year served to any employee terminated duringnon-employee director following the twelve month period following a merger.

20


The following chart shows the amount payable to each non-employee director under the Redwood Empire Bancorp director severance policy:

     
NameAmount


John H. Brenengen $16,000 
Dana R. Johnson  90,000 
Mark H. Rodebaugh  16,000 
Gregory J. Smith  4,000 
William B. Stevenson  23,500 
David B. Warner  4,000 

     Some officers of Kerman State Bank haveEmployment and Compensation Agreements. Redwood Empire Bancorp has the following agreements with Kerman State Bank providing for severance benefitsdirectors and executive officers containing change in placecontrol compensation provisions which could be triggered as a result of (andthe merger:

     Under the Change of Control Agreement dated May 1, 2004 by and between Redwood Empire Bancorp and Kim C. McClaran, Ms. McClaran is entitled to receive one time her current annual base salary or the annual base salary in effect on the date of the merger, whichever is greater, than) the amount provided by the policy. The following severance benefits will be paid if, the officer listed is terminated during the twelve month period followingwithin two years after the merger:

 • Pete Susoev will receive payment equal to one year’s salary (approximately $74,500)Ms. McClaran’s employment with Redwood Empire is terminated and the bonus (if any)her annual compensation and/or fringe benefits are reduced by 10% or more from the immediately preceding year;levels in effect on the date of the merger; or
 
 • John Royal will receive payment equal to one year’s salary (approximately $65,000)Ms. McClaran’s duties, responsibilities and authority are materially modified from those of her current position or those of the bonus (if any) fromposition that she held on the immediately preceding year;date of the merger; or
 
 • Cathy Ponte will receive payment equalMs. McClaran is required to one year’s salary (approximately $50,620) andrelocate to work at a location more than 30 miles from her present office location on the bonus (if any) fromdate of the immediately preceding year;
• Donna Molter will receive payment equal to six months’ salary (approximately $24,060);
• Charles Jones will receive payment equal to nine months’ salary (approximately $40,860); and
• Gerald Sullivan will receive payment equal to six months’ salary (approximately $30,000).merger.

     Redwood Empire Bancorp expects that, as a result of the merger, Ms. McClaran will become entitled to a payment under this agreement equal to one time her annual base salary at the time of the merger. As of the record date for the meeting this payment would be approximately $110,000.

     Under the Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Patrick W. Kilkenny and Redwood Empire Bancorp dated as of November 1, 1993, as amended, upon notice of merger, Mr. Kilkenny may elect

36


to terminate his employment within 90 days of the notice and receive an amount equal to two times his annual base salary. In addition, if, within two years after the merger, Mr. Kilkenny’s employment is terminated, his compensation or authority is materially reduced, or he is required to relocate, Mr. Kilkenny is entitled to receive an amount equal to two times his current annual base salary or his base salary at the time of the merger whichever is greater. Redwood Empire Bancorp expects that, as a result of the merger, Mr. Kilkenny will become entitled to a payment under this agreement equal to two times his annual base salary at the time of the merger. As of the record date for the meeting this payment would be approximately $490,228.

     At Westamerica Bancorporation’s request, Mr. Kilkenny has agreed to enter into a consulting agreement with Westamerica Bancorporation upon completion of the merger. His duties under the agreement will be to assist Westamerica Bancorporation in the areas of employee retention, customer retention, operation of the Redwood Merchant Services card-processing division and community relations. The agreement will have a term of one year, but Mr. Kilkenny may terminate it early (except as the card-processing division) on six months’ notice. Westamerica Bancorporation will pay Mr. Kilkenny at an annual rate of $245,000 plus benefits for his consulting services.

     Under the Salary Continuation Agreement by and between National Bank of the Redwoods and Stephen A. Fleming dated April 14, 2004, upon the merger, National Bank of the Redwoods must pay Mr. Fleming the greater of (a) the disability benefit set forth in this agreement; or (b) the amount determined by vesting Mr. Fleming in 10% of the normal retirement benefit for every completed year of employment commencing as of his date of hire until he is 100% vested in the normal retirement benefit. As of the record date of the meeting, this amount was $43,827.

     Under the Employment Agreement effective December 1, 2003, between National Bank of the Redwoods and Stephen A. Fleming, as amended, if, within two years after the merger Mr. Fleming’s employment is terminated without cause, or is terminated by Mr. Fleming following a reduction in his compensation, benefits, title or responsibilities, or a relocation of his principal office of more than 40 miles, Mr. Fleming will be entitled to a severance payment equal to two times his base annual salary as of the date of such termination and a pro-rated bonus for the portion of the year during which his employment was terminated, based on the previous year’s bonus award. Redwood Empire Bancorp expects that, as a result of the merger, Mr. Fleming will become entitled to a payment equal to two times his annual base salary at the time of the merger plus a pro-rated bonus for the portion of the year in which the merger occurs. As of the record date for the meeting this payment would be approximately $472,500.

     Under the Redwood Empire Bancorp Director Compensation Agreement by and between Redwood Empire and Dana R. Johnson dated April 20, 2004, as amended, if Mr. Johnson is terminated within 24 months of the merger, he will be entitled to a payment of $400,000. Redwood Empire Bancorp expects that, as a result of the merger, Mr. Johnson will become entitled to a payment equal to $400,000 under this agreement. In connection with the merger, Mr. Johnson has agreed to place in escrow the amount of his severance payments that could constitute a “Golden Parachute” payment if Mr. Johnson were deemed to be an “officer” for purposes of the Golden Parachute tax rules in sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code pending a request for a pre-filing ruling and/or or private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that the payment of the escrowed payment to Mr. Johnson will not result in the disallowance of the deduction under section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. If Mr. Johnson receives an unfavorable ruling, then the escrowed payment will be distributed to Westamerica Bancorporation. If Mr. Johnson is unable to obtain a ruling on this matter, the escrowed payment may be distributed to Mr. Johnson if Mr. Johnson indemnifies Westamerica Bancorporation against the disallowance of the deduction under section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. As of the record date for the meeting, Redwood Empire Bancorp estimates that the amount of this escrowed payment would be approximately $280,000.

37


Summary chart of maximum possible payments to Redwood Empire Bancorp directors and executive officers upon the merger.The following chart shows the maximum possible payment from all sources to each Redwood Empire Bancorp director and executive officer as a result of the merger:

                 
Value of Unvested
Options Accelerated as a
Result of the MergerRedwood EmpireChange in
Based on $28.74Bancorp DirectorControl
Nameper ShareSeverance PolicyAgreementsTotal





John H. Brenengen $40,762  $16,000  $  $56,762 
Stephen A. Fleming  124,875      516,327   641,202 
Dana R. Johnson  124,080   90,000   400,000   614,080 
Patrick W. Kilkenny        490,228   490,228 
Mark H. Rodebaugh  31,066   16,000      47,066 
Gregory J. Smith  101,475   4,000      105,475 
William B. Stevenson  73,620   23,500      97,120 
David B. Warner  5,740   4,000      9,740 
Kim C. McClaran  6,532      110,000   116,532 
Total $508,150  $153,500  $1,516,555  $2,178,205 

Accounting treatmentTreatment

     The merger will be subject to the purchase method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s assets and liabilities will be reflected on Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s future financial statements at their fair market values, and the excess of the aggregate merger consideration above the fair market value of acquired assets and liabilities will be reflected as goodwill or other identifiable intangibles. Intangibles must be valued annually and any impairment written off at the time of the determination of impairment. Intangibles such as those based on core deposits will be amortized over their estimated lives.

Certain United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

     The following summary discusses certain anticipated U.S. federal income tax consequences

     Kerman State Bank and Westamerica expect that of the merger will qualifyapplicable to a holder of shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock that holds such shares as a reorganization under Section 368(a) ofcapital assets. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and havewhich we refer to as the following consequences for federal income tax purposes:

• The merger will not result in any recognized gain or loss to Kerman State Bank, Westamerica, or Westamerica Bank, and Westamerica Bank will succeed to the carryover basis and the holding periodInternal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations, judicial authorities, published positions of the assets of Kerman State Bank;
• Except for any cash received in lieu of any fractional share or on account of dissenting shares, no gain or loss will be recognized by holders of Kerman State Bank common stock who receive Westamerica common stock in exchange for the shares of Kerman State Bank common stock which they hold;
• The holding period of Westamerica common stock issued in exchange for Kerman State Bank common stock will include the holding period of the Kerman State Bank common stock for which it is exchanged, assuming that the shares of Kerman State Bank common stock are capital assets in the hands of the holder thereof at the effective date; and
• The basis of the Westamerica common stock received in the exchange will be the same as the basis of the Kerman State Bank common stock for which it was exchanged, decreased by any cash received in the merger for fractional shares and increased by the amount of any gain recognized as a result of the merger.

     A shareholder who perfects dissenters’ rights and receives payment for his or her Kerman State Bank shares will be treated as if such shares were redeemed. In general, if the shares are held as a capital asset at the time of the merger, the dissenting shareholder will recognize a capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the amount of cash received and the basis of the shares in the hands of the dissenting shareholder. However, if the dissenting shareholder owns, directly or indirectly through the application of Section 318 of the Code, any shares of common stock as to which dissenters’ rights are not exercised and perfected and which are therefore exchanged for Westamerica common stock in the merger, the shareholder may be treated as

21


having received a dividend in the amount of cash paid to the shareholder in exchange for the shares as to which dissenter’s rights were perfected. Under Section 318 of the Code, an individual is deemed to own stock that is actually owned (or deemed to be owned) by certain members of his or her family (spouse, children, grandchildren and parents, with certain exceptions) and other related parties, including, for example, certain entities in which the individual has a direct or indirect interest (including partnerships, estates, trusts and corporations), as well as stock that such individual (or a related person) has the right to acquire upon exercise of an option or conversion right held by such individual (or a related person). Each Kerman State Bank shareholder who intends to dissent from the merger (see “The Merger — Dissenters’ rights of appraisal”) should consult his or her own tax advisor with respect to the application of the constructive ownership rules to the shareholder’s particular circumstances.

     For federal tax purposes, the highest marginal tax rate for individuals on ordinary income is 38.6%, compared to 20% for capital gain, and the highest marginal tax rate for corporations is 35% on ordinary income and capital gain. Capital losses are treated differently than ordinary losses. Essentially, a capital loss for any taxable year may be deducted by a corporation in that year only to the extent of capital gain, and by an individual in that year only to the extent of capital gain plus up to $3,000 of ordinary income. Capital losses not deductible in the year they occur may be carried forward indefinitely by individuals and may be carried back up to three years and forward up to five years by corporations.

     Neither Kerman State Bank or Westamerica has requested a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to in connectionthis proxy statement/ prospectus as the IRS, and other applicable authorities, all as in effect on the date of this document and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). This discussion does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to a particular person or the tax consequences that may be relevant to persons subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws (including, among others, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities or foreign currencies, banks, insurance companies, financial institutions or persons that hold their Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction, persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders that exercise appraisal rights, holders who are not U.S. persons as defined in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Internal Revenue Code, persons that are, or hold their Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock through, partnerships or other pass-through entities, or persons who acquired their Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock through the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation). In addition, this discussion does not address any aspects of state, local, non-U.S. taxation or U.S. federal taxation other than income taxation.

     No ruling has been requested from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. ItHowever, it is a condition to the consummation of the merger that Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp and Westamerica Bancorporation will have received an opinionopinions from Westamerica’stheir respective counsel that the merger will constitute a reorganization“reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code for federal income tax purposes. TheThese tax opinionopinions neither bindsbind the Internal Revenue ServiceIRS nor precludespreclude the Internal Revenue ServiceIRS from adopting a contrary position. The tax opinion isopinions will be subject to certain assumptions and qualifications and iswill be based in part on the truth and accuracy of certain representations of Kerman StateRedwood Empire Bancorp, National Bank of the

38


Redwoods, Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences set forth below.

Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to them, as well as the effects of state, local, non-U.S. tax laws and U.S. tax laws other than income tax laws.

     Redwood Empire Bancorp and Westamerica Bancorporation expect that the merger will qualify as a “reorganization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, Redwood Empire Bancorp and Westamerica Bancorporation expect that the merger will have the following U.S. federal income tax consequences:

• A Redwood Empire shareholder that exchanges all of its Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock for a combination of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock and cash in the merger will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of cash received in the merger and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock received in the merger over (b) the Redwood Empire shareholder’s aggregate tax basis in its Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock surrendered in exchange therefor. Any gain recognized will be capital gain (and further will be long-term capital gain if the Redwood Empire shareholder’s holding period for its Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock is more than one year as of the date of the exchange) unless the Redwood Empire shareholder’s receipt of cash has the effect of a distribution of a dividend, in which case the gain will be treated as ordinary dividend income to the extent of the holder’s ratable share of Redwood Empire’s accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For purposes of determining whether an Redwood Empire shareholder’s receipt of cash has the effect of a distribution of a dividend, the Redwood Empire shareholder will be treated as if it first exchanged all of its Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock solely in exchange for Westamerica Bancorporation common stock and then Westamerica immediately redeemed a portion of that stock for the cash that the holder actually received in the merger. Receipt of cash will generally not have the effect of a distribution of a dividend to the Redwood Empire shareholder if such receipt is, with respect to such holder, “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” or “substantially disproportionate,” each within the meaning of Section 302(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. The IRS has indicated in rulings that any reduction in the interest of a minority stockholder that owns a small number of shares in a publicly and widely held corporation and that exercises no control over corporate affairs would result in capital gain (as opposed to dividend) treatment. In determining the interest of a stockholder in a corporation, certain constructive ownership rules must be taken into account.
• Subject to the discussion above regarding possible dividend treatment, a Redwood Empire shareholder that receives cash instead of a fractional share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock in the merger will recognize capital gain or loss with respect to the fractional share in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of cash received instead of the fractional share and the portion of the holder’s tax basis in its Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock that is allocable to the fractional share. The capital gain or loss will be long-term if the holding period for such Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock is more than one year as of the date of the exchange.
• A Redwood Empire shareholder’s aggregate tax basis in the Westamerica common stock received in the merger will be equal to the stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in its Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock surrendered, decreased by the amount of any cash received and increased by the amount of any gain recognized.
• A Redwood Empire shareholder’s holding period for Westamerica common stock received in the merger will include the holding period of the Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock surrendered in the merger.

39


• No gain or loss will be recognized by Redwood Empire or Westamerica as a result of the merger, and Westamerica Bancorporation will succeed to the basis and the holding period of the assets of Redwood Empire.

     If the merger fails to qualify as a reorganization under“reorganization” within the meaning of section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, then Kerman State Bank shareholderseach Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholder would recognize taxable gain or loss with respect to each share of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp stock surrendered equal to the difference between the shareholder’sholder’s tax basis in thethat share and the sum of the cash and the fair market value, as of the effective time of the merger, of the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock received in exchange for thethat share. In that event, a shareholder’sstockholder’s aggregate basis in the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock so received would equal its fair market value and the shareholder’s holding period for that stock would begin on the day after the effective time of the merger. In addition, Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp would be treated as if it had made a taxable sale or exchange of all of its assets.

     This proxy statement/prospectus does not provide information aboutFor federal tax purposes, the highest marginal tax consequences of the merger under any state, local or foreign tax laws. This document does not address all aspects of federalrate on ordinary income taxation that may be relevantfor non-corporate taxpayers is generally 35%, while long term capital gains (which for this purpose includes certain “qualifying dividend income”) are subject to a Kerman State Bank shareholdermaximum 15% tax rate (reduced to 5% for individuals in lightthe 10% or 15% tax bracket). The highest marginal tax rate for corporations is 35% on both ordinary income and capital gain. The deductibility of the shareholder’s particular circumstances or if the shareholdercapital losses is subject to special rules. Accordingly, each Kerman State Banklimitations.

In general, a Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholder receiving cash in the merger will be subject to information reporting to the IRS. In addition, backup withholding at the applicable rate (currently 28%) will generally apply if the exchanging Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number or fails to properly certify that it is urgednot subject to backup withholding (generally on a substitute IRS Form W-9). Certain holders (including, among others, U.S. corporations) are not subject to information reporting or backup withholding, but they may still need to furnish a substitute IRS Form W-9 or otherwise establish an exemption. Any amount withheld as backup withholding from payments to an exchanging Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholder will be creditable against the Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholder’s federal income tax liability, provided that it timely furnishes the required information to the IRS. Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders should consult their tax advisors as to their qualifications for exemption from backup withholding and expected to consult with such shareholder’s own tax advisor to determine the particular United States federal, state, local or foreign income or other tax consequences of the merger. Kerman State Bank and Westamerica will not bear any expenses incurred by any shareholder arising from disputes with the Internal Revenue Service or any state or foreign tax agency over the tax consequences of the merger.procedure for obtaining an exemption.

Dissenters’ rightsRights of appraisalAppraisal

     ShareholdersYou may be given the opportunity to exercise dissenters’ rights in connection with the merger: such rights will be available only if demands for payment under that California statute are made, as described below, by the holders of Kerman State Bank who do not vote in favor5% or more of the merger may be entitledoutstanding shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock. The procedures for you to certainobtain dissenters’ appraisal rights underare set forth in Chapter 13 of the California General Corporation Law. Relevant excerptsThe information set forth below is a general summary of Chapter 13 dissenters’ rights as they are provided in Appendix C.

     Important details concerning these requirements are provided below; failurebeing made available to take these actions in a timely and proper fashion will result inyou. For purposes of convenience, please simply assume that the losstransaction is one which would give rise to the exercise of dissenters’ appraisal rights.

22


     The following discussionrights by Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders, and all remaining procedures and requirements of the law are applicable. This summary is not a complete statementdiscussion of the law relating to dissenters’ rightsChapter 13 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to AppendixSections 1300-1304 of Chapter 13, which are attached as Annex C. This discussion and Appendix C should be reviewed carefully by any shareholder of Kerman State Bank who wishesIf you wish to exercise dissenters’ rights or who wisheswish to preserve the right to do so since failure to comply withyou should carefully read Annex C. You must follow exactly the required procedures set forth in Chapter 13 will result inof the loss ofCalifornia General Corporation Law or any dissenters’ rights.rights may be lost.

     If the merger is consummated, those shareholders of Kerman State Bank whoif you elect to exercise theiryour dissenters’ rights and whoyou perfect your rights in a timely and proper fashion perfect those rightsin accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 13, you will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the “fair market value” of their shares in cash. Under Section 1300(a) of the California General Corporation Law, “fairyour shares. Chapter 13 provides that fair market value” wouldvalue shall be determined as of August 25, 2004, the business day before the firstpublic announcement of the terms of the merger, excluding any appreciation or depreciation caused by the merger. See “Summary — Comparative Kerman State Bank market price data.”

     If the merger is approved, Kerman State Bank will, within ten days after the meeting, mail to any shareholder who has a right to require the Kerman State Bank to purchase his or her shares a notice that the required shareholder approval of the merger was obtained. This notice of approval will state the price determined by Kerman State Bank to represent the “fair market value” of any dissenting shares, and will provide a brief description of the procedures to be followed by dissenting shareholders who wish to exercise their statutory rights. The dissenting shareholder must deliver his or her share certificate(s) for receipt by Kerman State Bank within 30 days after the date on which the notice of approval was mailed to the shareholder. The certificate(s) will be stamped or endorsed with a statement that the shares are dissenting shares and will be returned to the dissenting shareholder.

     In order to qualify for dissenters’ rights, Kerman State Bank shareholders (i) must make a written demand on Kerman State Bank within 30 days after Kerman State Bank mails to shareholders the notice of approval of the merger and the procedure to be followed, and (ii) must not vote their shares in favor of the merger.

     A written demand by a Kerman State Bank shareholder should be sent to Kerman State Bank, P.O. Box 356, Kerman, CA 93630, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The written demand must (i) state the number and class of shares held of record by such shareholder which the shareholder demands that Kerman State Bank purchase for cash, and (ii) contain a statement of the amount which the shareholder claims to beRedwood Empire Bancorp believes the fair market value of its stock is $25.99 as of August 25, 2004, which is the last reported sales price on the Nasdaq National Market as of that date.

     You must satisfy each of the following requirements for your shares to be considered dissenting shares asunder Chapter 13. Shares of the day before announcement of the proposed merger. That statement will constitute an offerRedwood Empire Bancorp must be purchased by theRedwood Empire Bancorp from

40


a dissenting shareholder to sell his or her dissenting shares to Kerman State Bank at that price.

     The statements in the notice of approval will constitute an offer by Kerman State Bank to purchase from its shareholders any dissenting shares at the price stated,if all applicable requirements are complied with, but only if demands are made for payment with respect to 5% or more of the merger is consummated. However, the determinationoutstanding shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock.

     This 5% limitation does not apply to shares which are subject to a restriction on transfer imposed by Kerman State Bank of fair market valueRedwood Empire Bancorp or by any law or regulation. Redwood Empire Bancorp is not bindingaware of any restriction on itstransfer of any of their respective shares of common stock except restrictions which may be imposed upon shareholders who are deemed to be “affiliates” of Redwood Empire Bancorp as that term is used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Those shareholders who believe there is some restriction affecting their shares should consult with their own counsel as to the nature and if a dissenting shareholder chooses notextent of any dissenters’ rights they may have. In addition, Redwood Empire Bancorp is required to accept such offer, he or she has the right during a period of six months following the mailing of the notice of approval to file a lawsuit to have the fair market value, as described in Section 1300(a), determined by a court. The fair market value ofpurchase dissenting shares as determined by the court in those circumstances could be higher or lower than the amount offered by Kerman State Bank in the notice of approval or the consideration provided for in merger agreement, and any such determination would be binding on the dissenting shareholder or shareholders involved in the lawsuit and on Kerman State Bank and Westamerica. Any party may appeal from the judgment. However, the court action to determine the fair market value of shares will be suspendedonly if litigation is instituted to test the sufficiency or regularity of the votes of the shareholders in authorizing the merger. No shareholder who has appraisal rights under Chapter 13 will have any right to attack the validity of the merger except in an action to test whether the number of shares required to authorize the merger has been legally voted in favor of the merger.

     Dissenting Kerman State Bank shares may lose their status as such if any of the following events occurs:conditions are satisfied:

 • You must have shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock outstanding as of the record date of the shareholder’s meeting;
• You must vote the shares against the merger. It is not sufficient to abstain from voting. However, you may abstain as to part of your shares or vote part of those shares for the merger is abandoned (inwithout losing the right to exercise dissenters’ rights with respect to those shares which case Kerman State Bankwere voted against the merger; and
• If you voted against the merger and you wish to have Redwood Empire purchase those shares that were voted by you against the merger, you must pay onmake a written demand to dissenting shareholders who have initiated proceedings in good faith as provided under Chapter 13 all necessary expensesRedwood Empire purchase those shares of common stock for cash at their fair market value. The demand must include the information specified below and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred inmust be received by Redwood Empire or its transfer agent no later than the date of the shareholders’ meeting at which the shareholder may vote such proceedings);shares.

23     If you return a proxy without voting instructions or with instructions to vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the merger agreement, your shares will automatically be voted in favor of the merger and you will lose your dissenters’ rights.

     If the merger is approved by the Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders, Redwood Empire Bancorp will have 10 days after the approval to mail those shareholders who voted against the merger and who made a timely demand for purchase, assuming that the holders of 5% or more of the Redwood Empire Bancorp shares made such demand, written notice of the approval along with a copy of Sections 1300 through 1304 of Chapter 13. In the notice of approval, Redwood Empire Bancorp must state the price it determines represents the fair market value of the dissenting shares. This notice will constitute an offer by Redwood Empire Bancorp to purchase the dissenting shares at the price stated. Additionally, Redwood Empire Bancorp must set forth in the approval notice a brief description of the procedures a shareholder must follow if he or she desires to exercise dissenters’ rights.

     A written demand is essential for dissenters’ rights. Chapter 13 requires you to specify in the written demand the number of shares you hold of record that you are demanding that Redwood Empire Bancorp purchase from you. In the written demand, you must also include a statement of the amount you claim to be the fair market value of those shares as of the business day before the terms of the merger were first announced, excluding any appreciation or depreciation because of the proposed merger. It is Redwood Empire Bancorp’s position that this day is August 25, 2004. You may take the position in the written demand that a different date is applicable. This demand constitutes an offer by you to sell the dissenting shares at the price stated.

     In addition to the requirements of the provisions of Chapter 13 of the California Corporations Code described herein, Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp recommend that you comply with the following conditions to ensure that the demand is properly executed and delivered.

• The demand should be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.
• The demand should be signed by the shareholder of record, or his or her duly authorized representative, exactly as his or her name appears on the stock certificates evidencing the shares.
• A demand for the purchase of the shares jointly owned by more than one person should identify and be signed by all such holders.

41


 • Any person signing a demand for purchase in any representative capacity, such as attorney-in-fact, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, should indicate his or her title, and, if Redwood Empire so requests, furnish written proof of his or her capacity and authority to sign the demand.

     A shareholder may not withdraw a demand for payment without the consent of Redwood Empire Bancorp.

     Under California law, a demand by a shareholder is not effective for any purpose unless it is received by Redwood Empire Bancorp or its transfer agent, no later than the date of the shareholders’ meeting at which such shares are entitled to be voted.

     Within 30 days after the date on which Redwood Empire Bancorp mails the notice of the approval of the merger, dissenting shareholders must also submit the certificates representing the dissenting shares to Redwood Empire Bancorp at the office it designates in the notice of approval. Redwood Empire Bancorp will stamp or endorse the certificates with a statement that the shares are dissenting shares or Redwood Empire Bancorp will exchange the certificates with certificates of appropriate denomination that are so stamped or endorsed. If a shareholder transfers any shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock before submitting the shares for endorsement, then such shares will lose their status as dissenting shares.

     If Redwood Empire Bancorp and you agree that the surrendered shares are dissenting shares and agree upon the price of the shares, you are entitled to receive the agreed price together with interest thereon at the legal rate on judgments from the date of the agreement between Redwood Empire Bancorp and the dissenting shareholder. Redwood Empire Bancorp will pay the fair value of the dissenting shares within 30 days after Redwood Empire Bancorp and you agree upon the price of the shares or within 30 days after any statutory or contractual conditions to the merger have been satisfied, whichever is later. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s duty to pay is subject to your surrendering the certificates and is also subject to the restrictions imposed under California law on the ability of Redwood Empire Bancorp to purchase its outstanding shares.

     If Redwood Empire Bancorp denies that the shares surrendered are dissenting shares, or Redwood Empire Bancorp and you fail to agree upon the fair market value of such shares, then you may, within six months after the notice of approval is mailed, file a complaint in the Superior Court of the proper county of California requesting the court to make such determinations. In the alternative, you may intervene in any pending action brought by any other dissenting shareholder. If you fail to file such a complaint or fail to intervene in a pending action within the specified six-month period, your dissenting rights will be lost. If the fair market value of the dissenting shares is at issue, the court will determine, or will appoint one or more impartial appraisers to determine, such fair market value. The costs of the action will be assessed or apportioned as the court considers equitable, but if the fair market value is determined to exceed the price offered to the shareholder, Redwood Empire Bancorp will be required to pay such costs. If the fair market value is determined to exceed 125% of the price offered to the shareholder, the court may also require, at its discretion, that Redwood Empire Bancorp pay attorneys’ fees, fees of expert witnesses and interest.

     This summary has already described certain situations where shareholders of Redwood Empire Bancorp will cease to have dissenters’ appraisal rights. In addition to the situations described above, you will cease to have dissenters’ appraisal rights if:

• Redwood Empire abandons the merger, in which case Redwood Empire will pay any dissenting shares are transferred before being submitted to Kerman State Bank for endorsement;shareholder who has filed a complaint, as described above, all necessary expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in such proceedings;
 
 • theyou surrender your shares for conversion into shares of another class;
• you transfer your dissenting shareholder withdraws his or her demand with the consent of Kerman State Bank;shares before submitting them to Redwood Empire for endorsement; or
 
 • inyou withdraw your demand for the absencepurchase of agreement between the dissenting shareholder and Kerman State Bank as toshares with the priceconsent of his or her shares, the Kerman State Bank shareholder fails to file suit or otherwise fails to become a party to such suit within six months following the mailing of the notice of approval.Redwood Empire.

42


     Any demands, notices, certificates or other documents required to be delivered to Redwood Empire Bancorp may be sent to:

Redwood Empire Bancorp
111 Santa Rosa Avenue
Santa Rosa, California 95404
Attention: Corporate Secretary

     The receiptIt is a condition to completion of a cashthe merger that holders of not more than 9% of the outstanding shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock demand and perfect dissenters’ rights. Each holder of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock who becomes entitled pursuant to provisions of applicable law to payment for his or her dissenting shares shall receive payment therefor from Westamerica Bancorporation and such shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock shall be canceled. After completion of the merger, Westamerica Bancorporation will result in recognitionassume the rights and obligations of gain or lossRedwood Empire Bancorp with respect to the exercise of an payment for federal and California state income tax purposes by dissenting shareholders. See “The Merger — certain federal income tax consequences.”dissenters’ rights.

Resales of Westamerica common stockBancorporation Common Stock

     The shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock to be issued to shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp under the merger agreement have been registered under the Securities Act, so these shares may be freely traded without restriction by peoplepersons who will not be affiliates of Westamerica Bancorporation after the merger and who were not affiliates of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp on the date of the special meeting. All directors and certain officers of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp and holders of 10% or more of the outstanding shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock may be considered to have been affiliates of Kerman State Bank.Redwood Empire Bancorp. Those peoplepersons may resell shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock to be received by them in the merger only if the shares are registered for resale under the Securities Act or an exemption from such registration under the Securities Act is available. Those peoplepersons may be permitted to resell the Westamerica Bancorporation shares under the safe harbor provisions of Rule 145 under the Securities Act (or Rule 144 in the case of persons who become affiliates of Westamerica)Westamerica Bancorporation) or as otherwise permitted under the Securities Act. PeoplePersons who may be deemed affiliates of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp or Westamerica Bancorporation generally include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with, Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp or Westamerica Bancorporation, and may include certain officers and directors of such entities as well as principal shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp or Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation. We encourage any such person to obtain advice of securities counsel before reselling any Westamerica Bancorporation shares.

     At the time the parties signed the merger agreement, each director and executive officerperson deemed by Westamerica to be affiliates of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp executed and delivered a written agreement to the effect that such person will not offer or sell or otherwise dispose of any Westamerica Bancorporation common stock received in the merger in violation of the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

     The following is a summary of the material provisions of the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as AppendixAnnex A. The merger agreement is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. You are urged to read the merger agreement in its entirety.

Structure of the merger; effective timeMerger; Effective Time

     The merger agreement contemplates the merger of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp with and into Westamerica Bank.Bancorporation. Westamerica BankBancorporation will be the surviving corporation in the merger and will continue its corporate existence under California law. The merger will become effective upon the filing with the California Secretary of State and the DFI of a duly executed merger agreement and officers’ certificates required by Section 1103 of the California General Corporation Law unless a different time is provided in the merger agreement. The closing of the merger will take place on a date to be specified by the parties, which will be the earliest practicable day after satisfaction of all of the conditions required by the merger agreement, unless another time or date is agreed to in writing by Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State Bank.Redwood Empire Bancorp. If

43


the closing would otherwise occur in December 2004 or January 2005, Westamerica Bancorporation may elect to defer the closing until the first business day of February 2005 or as soon as practicable after that date. The merger agreement may be terminated by either Westamerica Bancorporation or Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp if, among other reasons, the merger is not consummated on or before September 30, 2002.May 25, 2005. See “— Conditions to the completion of the merger” and “— Termination.”

24


Conversion of Kerman State Bank common stockRedwood Empire Bancorp Common Stock

     If you are a shareholder of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock as of the effective time of the merger, each share of your shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock will be converted into the right to receive approximately 0.2731$28.74, consisting of a share$11.49 in cash and $17.25 in Westamerica Bancorporation common stock (valued at its average closing price for the 20 trading days ending three business days before the effective date of Westamerica common stock,the merger), subject to certain possible adjustments based upon the exchange ratio.adjustments. Your shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock will no longer be outstanding and will be automatically canceled and retired and will cease to exist. Your stock certificate previously representing shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock will be exchanged for a certificate representing whole shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock.

     The exchange ratio (the number of shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock into which the stock portion of each share of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock willshall be converted at closing) is a function of several factors, including Kerman State Bank’s adjusted equity (as definedequal to the following, in the merger agreement), amount of performing loans and Significant Liabilities (as defined in the merger agreement). The exchange ratio may be reduced if:each case rounded to four decimal places:

 • Kerman State Bank’s performing loans beforeif the Westamerica average closing areprice is not less than $60 million;$45.4950 and not more than $55.6050, a fraction (i) the numerator of which is $17.25 and (ii) the denominator of which is the Westamerica average closing price (as defined below);
 
 • Kerman State Bank’s allowance for loan losses beforeif the Westamerica average closing determined under Westamerica’s methodology,price is greater than $3.2 million;$55.6050, a fraction (i) the numerator of which is $17.25 and (ii) the denominator of which is $55.6050.
 
 • Kerman State Bank incurs certain obligations defined as Significant Liabilities, which include new unapproved leases and other contractual obligations; capital expenditures above $25,000; contingent liabilities related to hazardous materials; new or accelerated severance or pension obligations; merger-related expenses above $470,000; and certain loan loss provisions and write-downs of foreclosed property; or
• Theif the Westamerica average closing price for Westamerica common stock overis less than $45.4950, a fraction (i) the 20 trading days ending ten business days beforenumerator of which is $17.25 and (ii) the closingdenominator of which is greater than $41.76.$45.4950.

     “Westamerica average closing price” means the average of the closing prices of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock quoted on the Nasdaq National Market as reported in The Wall Street Journal on each of the last 20 trading days on which trades in Westamerica Bancorporation’s shares occur ending on the day which is the day prior to two business days prior to the effective date, whether or not trades occurred on those days, rounded to four decimal places.

     As a result of the above formula (assuming no adjustment as a result of a required divestiture of deposits), if the Westamerica average closing price is between $45.4950 and $55.6050, the exchange ratio will be a fraction of a share that, when multiplied by the Westamerica average closing price, will produce a stock portion of $17.25; if the Westamerica average closing price is higher than $55.6050, the exchange ratio will be fixed at 0.3102 and the value of the stock portion will be higher than $17.25; if the Westamerica average closing price is lower than $45.4950, the exchange ratio will be fixed at 0.3792 and the value of the stock portion will be less than $17.25. The merger agreement may be increased if:terminated by the board of directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp if Westamerica’s average closing price is less than $40.44. The merger agreement may be terminated by the board of directors of Westamerica Bancorporation if Westamerica’s average closing price is greater than $60.66.

     For example:

 • Kerman State Bank’s allowanceif the Westamerica average closing price is $52.50, then the stock portion exchange ratio would have a numerator of $17.25 and a denominator of $52.50; the stock portion exchange ratio would therefore be 0.3286; the stock portion exchange ratio times one share of Westamerica common stock would have a nominal value at that time of 0.3286 multiplied by $52.50 or $17.25, and the merger consideration would consist of a cash portion of $11.49 plus a stock portion of $17.25 for loan losses at the month-end before closing, determined under Westamerica’s methodology, is less than $2.4 million; ora total of $28.74;
 
 • Westamerica’sif the Westamerica average closing price as described above is less than $33.80.$57.50, then the stock portion exchange ratio would have a numerator of $17.25 and a denominator of $55.6050; the stock portion exchange ratio would therefore be 0.3102; the stock portion exchange ratio times one share of Westamerica common stock would have

44


a nominal value at that time of 0.3102 multiplied by $57.50 or $17.84, and the merger consideration would consist of a cash portion of $11.49 plus a stock portion of $17.84 for a total of $29.33;
• if the Westamerica average closing price is $42.50, then the stock portion exchange ratio would have a numerator of $17.25 and a denominator of $45.4950; the stock portion exchange ratio would therefore be 0.3792; the stock portion exchange ratio times one share of Westamerica common stock would have a nominal value at that time of 0.3792 multiplied by $42.50 or $16.12, and the merger consideration would equal a cash portion of $11.49 plus a stock portion of $16.12 for a total of $27.61.

     The adjustments that will be made on accountHowever, if Westamerica Bancorporation is required by any condition of those factors are interrelateda governmental approval to divest deposits of either National Bank of the Redwoods or Westamerica Bank in Lake County, California, then the stock and are described in Section 2.1(a)cash portions of the merger agreement. We encourage youconsideration and the aggregate per share merger consideration shall be reduced in accordance with the following table:

                     
Adjusted Merger Consideration Per Share

If the volume of deposits thatUp toOver $10 MillionOver $20 MillionOver
Westamerica is required to divest inInitial Value$10 Millionto $20 Millionto $30 Million$30 Million
Lake County is:




Stock portion $17.25  $17.19  $17.16  $17.10  $17.07 
Cash portion  11.49   11.45   11.43   11.39   11.37 
Merger consideration  28.74   28.64   28.59   28.49   28.44 

and references above to review this text“$11.49,” “$17.25” and “$28.74” will be deemed to be references to the applicable reduced values in the merger agreement for this full description of the adjustments that are possible.table above.

     The following tables illustrate the exchange ratio and the market value that Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders would receive for each share of KermanRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock based on certain assumptions and the changes in the exchange ratio that would take effect if certain of the adjustments described above were to be made. The tables below assume an average closing price of Westamerica common stock of $39.77. No assurance can be given that the actual value of each share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock upon completion of the merger will be equal to the average closing price used to determine the exchange ratio. “Per share

25


amount” means the exchange ratio multiplied by the assumed value of one share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock.
                   
(Dollars in 000s)
Adjustments to Exchange Ratio                
If Performing Loans are: $60,000  $56,000  $52,000     
 And Adjusted Equity is: $9,861  $9,861  $9,861     
  Exchange ratio would be:  0.2731   0.2598   0.2535     
  Per share amount would be: $10.86  $10.33  $10.08     
If Performing Loans are $60,000, and
If the loan loss reserve is adjusted by:
 $(400) $(200) $200  $400 
 Adjusted Equity would be $10,101  $9,981  $9,741  $9,621 
  Exchange ratio would be:  0.2797   0.2764   0.2699   0.2667 
  Per share amount would be: $11.12  $10.99  $10.74  $10.61 
If Performing Loans are $56,000, and
If the loan loss reserve is adjusted by:
 $(400) $(200) $200  $400 
 Adjusted Equity would be $10,101  $9,981  $9,741  $9,621 
  Exchange ratio would be:  0.2638   0.2618   0.2577   0.2557 
  Per share amount would be: $10.49  $10.41  $10.25  $10.17 
If Performing Loans are $60,000, and
If the loan loss reserve is not adjusted:
                
 If Significant Liabilities are $200  $400  $800     
  Exchange ratio would be:  0.2604   0.2477   0.2224     
  Per share amount would be $10.36  $9.85  $8.84     
If Performing Loans are $56,000, and
If the loan loss reserve is not adjusted:
                
 If Significant Liabilities are $200  $400  $800     
  Exchange ratio would be:  0.2471   0.2344   0.2167     
  Per share amount would be $9.83  $9.32  $8.62     

26


     The following table illustratesshows the effect on the exchange ratio and per share amount received whenthe value of the merger consideration of changes in the average closing price (in increments of 5% from $50.55) of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock (rounded to the nearest cent):

Assuming No Adjustment from Divestiture of Deposits

                   
Value of Stock PortionValue of Merger
Westamerica AverageBased onConsideration Based on
Closing Price isExchange RatioAverage Closing PriceCash PortionAverage Closing Price





$40.4400   0.3792  $15.33  $11.49  $26.82 
 42.9675   0.3792   16.29   11.49   27.78 
 45.4950   0.3792   17.25   11.49   28.74 
 48.0225   0.3592   17.25   11.49   28.74 
 50.5500   0.3412   17.25   11.49   28.74 
 53.0775   0.3250   17.25   11.49   28.74 
 55.6050   0.3102   17.25   11.49   28.74 
 58.1325   0.3102   18.03   11.49   29.52 
 60.6600   0.3102   18.82   11.49   30.31 

45


     The following table shows the effect on the exchange ratio and the value of the merger consideration of changes in the average closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, is equalassuming a required divestiture of up to a range$10 million in deposits in Lake County:

Assuming Divestiture of values between $31.00 and $44.00 per share.up to $10 Million in Deposits

         
FinalFinal
Exchangeper Share
Average Closing PriceRatioAmount



$31.00  0.2978  $9.23 
 32.00  0.2885   9.23 
 33.00  0.2797   9.23 
 34.00  0.2731   9.29 
 35.00  0.2731   9.56 
 36.00  0.2731   9.83 
 37.00  0.2731   10.10 
 38.00  0.2731   10.38 
 39.00  0.2731   10.65 
 40.00  0.2731   10.92 
 41.00  0.2731   11.20 
 42.00  0.2715   11.40 
 43.00  0.2652   11.40 
 44.00  0.2592   11.40 
                   
Value of Stock PortionValue of Merger
Westamerica AverageBased on AverageConsideration Based on
Closing Price isExchange RatioClosing PriceCash PortionAverage Closing Price





$40.4400   0.3778  $15.28  $11.45  $26.73 
 42.9675   0.3778   16.24   11.45   27.69 
 45.4950   0.3778   17.19   11.45   28.64 
 48.0225   0.3580   17.19   11.45   28.64 
 50.5500   0.3401   17.19   11.45   28.64 
 53.0775   0.3239   17.19   11.45   28.64 
 55.6050   0.3091   17.19   11.45   28.64 
 58.1325   0.3091   17.97   11.45   29.42 
 60.6600   0.3091   18.75   11.45   30.30 

     The merger agreement provides that it is a conditionfollowing table shows the effect on the exchange ratio and the value of closing that the aggregate merger consideration be at least $12,500,000. Ifof changes in the minimum were payable,average closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, assuming a required divestiture of more than $10 million but not more than $20 million in deposits in Lake County:

Assuming Divestiture of More Than $10 Million up to $20 Million in Deposits

                   
Value of Stock PortionValue of Merger
Westamerica AverageBased onConsideration Based on
Closing Price isExchange RatioAverage Closing PriceCash PortionAverage Closing Price





$40.4400   0.3772  $15.25  $11.43  $26.68 
 42.9675   0.3772   16.21   11.43   27.64 
 45.4950   0.3772   17.16   11.43   28.59 
 48.0225   0.3573   17.16   11.43   28.59 
 50.5500   0.3395   17.16   11.43   28.59 
 53.0775   0.3233   17.16   11.43   28.59 
 55.6050   0.3086   17.16   11.43   28.59 
 58.1325   0.3086   17.94   11.43   29.42 
 60.6600   0.3086   18.72   11.43   30.30 

     The following table shows the per share amount would be approximately $8.62.effect on the exchange ratio and the value of the merger consideration of changes in the average closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, assuming a required divestiture of more than $20 million up to $30 million in deposits in Lake County:

Assuming Divestiture of More Than $20 Million up to $30 Million in Deposits

                   
Value of Stock PortionValue of Merger
Westamerica AverageBased onConsideration Based on
Closing Price isExchange RatioAverage Closing PriceCash PortionAverage Closing Price





$40.4400   0.3759  $15.20  $11.39  $26.59 
 42.9675   0.3759   16.15   11.39   27.54 
 45.4950   0.3759   17.10   11.39   28.49 
 48.0225   0.3561   17.10   11.39   28.49 
 50.5500   0.3383   17.10   11.39   28.49 
 53.0775   0.3222   17.10   11.39   28.49 
 55.6050   0.3075   17.10   11.39   28.49 
 58.1325   0.3075   17.88   11.39   29.27 
 60.6600   0.3075   18.65   11.39   30.04 

46


     The following table shows the effect on the exchange ratio and the value of the merger consideration of changes in the average closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, assuming a required divestiture of more than $30 million in deposits in Lake County:

Assuming Divestiture of More Than $30 Million in Deposits

                   
Value of Stock PortionValue of Merger
Westamerica AverageBased onConsideration Based on
Closing Price isExchange RatioAverage Closing PriceCash PortionAverage Closing Price





$40.4400   0.3752  $15.17  $11.37  $26.54 
 42.9675   0.3752   16.12   11.37   27.49 
 45.4950   0.3752   17.07   11.37   28.44 
 48.0225   0.3555   17.07   11.37   28.44 
 50.5500   0.3377   17.07   11.37   28.44 
 53.0775   0.3216   17.07   11.37   28.44 
 55.6050   0.3070   17.07   11.37   28.44 
 58.1325   0.3070   17.85   11.37   29.22 
 60.6600   0.3070   18.62   11.37   29.99 

     On [                    , 2002]2004], the last reported sale price for Westamerica Bancorporation common stock was $          . The average closing price maybe be higher or lower than this amount. The merger agreement may be terminated by the board of directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp if Westamerica’s average closing price is less than $40.44. The merger agreement may be terminated by the board of directors of Westamerica Bancorporation if Westamerica’s average closing price is greater than $60.66.

     You will not receive any fractional shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock. If you are entitled to a fraction of a share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock you will, instead, receive an amount in cash. The cash amount will be equal to the average closing price as reported onused to determine the Nasdaq for the Westamerica common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the closing date,exchange ratio, multiplied by the fraction of a share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock to which you would otherwise been entitled. You will not be entitled to dividends, voting rights, interest on the value of, or any other rights in respect of a fractional share. In the event Westamerica Bancorporation pays, declares or otherwise effects a stock split, reverse stock split, reclassification or stock dividend or stock distribution with respect to Westamerica Bancorporation common stock between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger, appropriate adjustments will be made to the average Westamerica Bancorporation closing price of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock.

We encourage you to review this text in the merger agreement for this full description of the adjustments that are possible.

Options

     At the effective time of the merger, each person holding one or more options to acquire Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock which are vestedexercisable or become exercisable immediately before the proposed merger will have the right to exercise any of these options immediately prior to the effective time. Any options that are not vested as of the effective time will be immediately exercisable if the holder of such options has not terminated his or her employment with Kerman State Bank before the effective date of the merger agreement. In addition, a person holding one or more options to acquire Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock will have the right to convert those options into a fully vested and exercisable option to purchase shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock.stock on economically equivalent terms. The number of shares to be subject to the option to purchase shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock will be equal to the product of the number of shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock subject to the original option and thean exchange ratio (as adjusted),applicable to options, rounded down to the nearest share. The exchange ratio applicable to options is a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of (1) the cash portion of the merger consideration plus (2) the exchange ratio multiplied by the Westamerica average closing price as described above, and the denominator of which is the applicable denominator used in Section 2.1(c) of the merger agreement to determine the exchange ratio for the stock portion of the merger consideration. The exercise price per share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock under the new option will be equal to the exercise price per share of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock under the original option divided by the exchange ratio. ratio applicable to options.

47


The exercise price will be rounded up to the nearest cent. In the case of

27


any options which are “incentive stock options,” as defined in Section 422 of the Code, the exercise price, the number of shares purchasable pursuant to such options and the terms and conditions of such options will be determined in order to comply with Section 424(a) of the Code. The duration and other terms of theeach new optionsoption will be the same as those of the original option.option that it replaces.

Exchange agent; exchange procedureAgent; Exchange Procedure

     Under the merger agreement, Westamerica Bancorporation has agreed to appoint Computershare Investor Services, LLC or its successor, or any other bank or trust company mutually acceptable to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp and Westamerica Bancorporation, as exchange agent for the purpose of exchanging certificates representing shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock for certificates representing the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock whichthat are to be issued under to the merger agreement. As soon as practicable after the effective time of the merger, upon the surrender of your Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shares certificate for cancellation, you will be entitled to receive a certificate representing the number of shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock determined in accordance with the merger agreement and a payment in cash with respect tofor the cash portion of the merger consideration and cash in lieu of any fractional shares. Do not send in your certificates at this time. Please wait until you receive a transmittal letter with more specific instructions on exchanging your certificates.

     You will not receive any dividends or other distributions of any kind which are declared payable to shareholders of record of the shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock after the effective time of the merger until you surrender your certificate for shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock. When you surrender your Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp certificate, you will be paid, without interest, any dividends or other distributions on the shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock on which the record date and payment date occurred on or after the effective time of the merger and on or before the date on which you surrendered your certificate for shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock.

     If you would like your certificate for shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock to be issued in a name other than the name or names in which your exchanged Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp certificate is registered, you will have to pay to the exchange agent any transfer costs, taxes or other expenses required by reason of the issuance of certificates for such shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock in a name other than the registered holder of the exchanged Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp certificate.

     All dividends or distributions, andThe cash portion of the merger consideration, any cash to be paid instead of fractional shares and all dividends or distributions, if held by the exchange agent for payment or delivery to the holders of unsurrendered Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp certificates representing shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock and unclaimed at the end of one year from the effective time of the merger, will (together with any interest earned on those shares) at that time be paid or redelivered by the exchange agent to Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation. After that time, if you still have not surrendered your Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp certificate, you must look as a general creditor only to Westamerica Bancorporation for payment or delivery of such dividends or distributions or cash, as the case may be.amounts.

     Neither Westamerica Bancorporation nor the surviving corporationRedwood Empire Bancorp will be liable to you for cash or shares (or dividends or distributions thereon) or cash payable instead of fractional shares delivered to a public official under any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar law.

Representations and warrantiesWarranties

     In the merger agreement, Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp make certain customary representations and warranties to one another, including those related to the following:

 • Incorporation, valid existence, and authority to conduct business;business and authorization to enter into the merger agreement;
 
 • Necessary licenses and permits;Corporate records;
 
 • Authorization to enter intoCompliance with laws and regulations;
• Valid execution and delivery of the merger agreement, and the absence of any material conflict between the merger agreement and other agreements to which each is a party;agreement;

48


• Securities laws filings;
 
 • Capital structure;
 
 • The accuracyAccuracy of information in regulatory filings;

28


• The accuracy of representations in the merger agreement, financial statements and this proxy statement/ prospectus;
 
 • Compliance with applicable laws;Accuracy of information in financial statements;
 
 • The performance of contractual obligations;Community Reinvestment Act rating;
 
 • The absenceFiling of any material adverse change or undisclosed liabilities;tax returns and payment of taxes;
 
 • The absenceAbsence of material litigation involving it;changes;
 
 • Compliance with ERISA;
• Absence of material litigation;
• Absence of facts preventing receipt of government approvals to merger;
• Information in securities filings;
• Accuracy in representations and warranties; and
 
 • The filing of tax returns and payment of taxes.Internal controls.

     Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp makes additional representations concerning the following matters:

 • The absenceEquity ownership of any regulatory agreements affecting it;subsidiaries;
 
 • The statusAbsence of itsundisclosed liabilities;
• Absence of undisclosed indemnification agreements;
• Title to properties and leases;
• Identification of material contracts;
• Disclosure of classified loans;
• Absence of restrictions on investments;
• Identification of certain employment benefits and contracts;
• Absence of collective bargaining agreements;
• Compensation of officers and employees;
• Rights to intellectual property;
• Disclosure of derivative transactions;
• Disclosure of brokers and finders;
• Status of insurance coverage and claims;
 
 • Title to its assets;Loan loss policies;
 
 • The status of its loan and investment portfolios;
• Its responsibility for broker’s fees;
• Identification of all material contracts to which it is a party;
• Identification of all employment contracts to which it is a party, compensation arrangements, and the status of all employee benefit plans;
• The absence of hazardous materials on any its properties;
• The number and terms of stock options outstanding;
• The absence of any severance arrangements that would constitute “parachute payments” under the Code;Transactions with affiliates; and
 
 • The absenceAbsence of any derivatives or similar hedging instruments in its investment portfolio.brokered deposits.

Conduct of business pendingBusiness Pending the mergerMerger

     In the merger agreement, Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp make certain covenants. Each agrees to do the following:

 • Take allfurther necessary actionactions to complete the merger;
 
 • Cooperate in preparing and filing a registration statement with the SEC to register the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock being offered to shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire under this proxy statement/prospectus;
 
 • Cooperate in obtaining all necessary government approvals;
 
 • Provide each other access to their financial statements;

49


 • Cooperate in the preparation of any press releases; and
• Coordinate with respect to the declaration of dividends;
 
 • Give each other notice of a breach of a representation, warranty or covenant in the merger agreement; and
• Give prompt notice to the other of any material adverse change or other event that might prevent the merger from occurring.

     In the merger agreement, Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp agrees to the following additional actions:

 • Conduct a shareholders meeting no later than 45 daysas promptly as reasonably practicable after the registration statement filed with the SEC to register the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock being offered to shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire under this proxy statement/ prospectus becomes effective;

29


• Delivery within 30 days’ of execution of the merger agreement support agreements signed by all directors of Redwood Empire;
 • Give Westamerica reasonable access to its properties, books and records, subject to a confidentiality obligation;records;
 
 • Not create any new branches or enter into any new leases of real property;
 
 • Not make or approve any increase in the compensation payable or to become payable by Kerman State BankRedwood Empire to some of its directors, officers, employees or agents;
 
 • Conduct its operations in the ordinary course of business;
 
 • Subject to continuing fiduciary duties, not effectsolicit or agree to effectknowingly encourage any mergersale or other business combination;disposition of 15% or more of the assets or equity shares of Redwood Empire;
• Not change its employee benefit plans;
 
 • Not change its capital structure;
 
 • Not pay or declare any dividend;dividend except consistent with past practice;
 
 • Not change its accounting methods;methods, except as required by generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 • Exercise commercially reasonable efforts to have all of its directors and certain shareholders enter into an “affiliate” agreement providing that they will comply with securities laws in the disposition of their stock received in the merger;
• Exercise best efforts to have all of its directors enter into noncompetition or nonsolicitation agreements;
 
 • Consult with Westamerica before making certain credit decisions; and
 
 • Continue its internal asset review process in accordance with certain specified procedures.procedures;
• Notify Westamerica promptly after certain loan classification decisions;
• Make accounting adjustments as Westamerica may reasonably request immediately before completion of the merger;
• Use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain third party consents where failure to obtain them would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Redwood Empire or Westamerica; and
• Conduct a cash reconciliation just before the completion of the merger.

     In the merger agreement, Westamerica Bancorporation agrees to the following additional actions:

• Reserve, issue and register its common stock to be issued to the shareholder and optionholders of Redwood Empire as set forth in the merger agreement and to cause such share to be approved for listing on the Nasdaq National Market;
• Not solicit or knowingly encourage any sale or other disposition of 15% or more of the assets or equity shares in Westamerica unless the proposal is conditioned upon the completion of the merger or would not materially interfere with the completion of the merger;
• Provide continuing indemnification to the directors and officers of Redwood Empire;

50


• Allow employees of Redwood Empire to retain credit for length of service for employee benefit purposes; and
• Not intentionally take any action which would disqualify the merger as a tax-free reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code.

Conditions to completionCompletion of the mergerMerger

     Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s obligation to complete the merger is subject to satisfaction of the following conditions:

 • The representations and warranties of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire shall be materially accurate;
 
 • Kerman State BankRedwood Empire will have performed its obligations under the merger agreements;agreement;
 
 • Kerman State BankRedwood Empire will not have suffered any material adverse change since September 30, 2001;December 31, 2003;
 
 • Receipt of approval by the shareholders of Kerman State Bank,Redwood Empire, with the total number of shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock held by persons who have dissenteddemanded and perfected dissenters’ rights not exceeding 9% of the outstanding shares of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock;
 
 • Receipt of an officer’s certificate signed on behalf of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire by its president/chief executive officer and its chief financial officer;
 
 • Receipt of a customary legal opinion of Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire’s counsel;
 
 • The absence of any legal impediment or burdensome condition to completion of the merger;
 
 • Receipt of an order from the SEC declaring the registration statement of Westamerica effective;
 
 • Receipt of all required consents and approvals from governmental authorities and third parties;
 
 • Receipt of an opinion that the merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code;
 
 • Receipt of an accountant’s assurance letter from Moss Adams, LLP;
• Receipt of Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire’s most recently prepared unaudited financial statements not latelater than five business days prior to the effective date;
 
 • Receipt of an undertaking letter signed by certain shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire agreeing not to sell or transfervote their Kerman State BankRedwood Empire shares of common stock;stock in favor of the merger and to provide irrevocable proxies to Westamerica for this purpose;
 
 • Kerman State BankRedwood Empire will have shareholders’ equity equal to at least $10,161,000;$23,531,400 (after deduction of actual and estimated merger-related expenses of approximately $3,823,600, net of the related tax benefit) plus $515,000 per month from May 31, 2004, through the month-end preceding the completion of the merger, except that if Westamerica elects to defer the closing of the merger until February 2005, as provided in the merger agreement, and Redwood Empire met this shareholder equity requirement when certain conditions to the merger have been satisfied, then this equity requirement will be deemed to have been satisfied for the time period thereafter;
 
 • Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire’s performing loans will equal or exceed $52,000,000;$400,000,000 and its non-interest bearing deposits will equal or exceed $100,000,000, except that if Westamerica Bancorporation elects to defer the closing of the merger until February 2005, as provided in the merger agreement, and Redwood Empire met these loans and deposits requirements when certain conditions to the merger have been satisfied, then these loans and deposits requirements will be deemed to have been satisfied for the time period thereafter;
 
 • Kerman State Bank’s non-interest bearing deposits will equal or exceed $13,800,000;Receipt of an accountant’s assurance letter from Crowe Chizek and Company LLC with respect to the financial statements of Redwood Empire;
 
 • Kerman State Bank’s significant liabilities will not exceed $925,000;

30


• Losses realized by Kerman State Bank from the sale of securities held in Kerman State Bank investment portfolios after September 30, 2001 will be reflected in Kerman State Bank’s financial statements;
• Kerman State Bank will have satisfied all spending and other commitments required by the merger agreement;
• Kerman State Bank will have taken all corrective action recommended by or resulting from its most recent compliance examinations;
• Kerman State Bank will have used its best efforts to have delivered an opinion of its loan review examiner to the effect that all loan losses in excess of $25,000 have been identified on the books of Kerman State Bank;
• Kerman State BankRedwood Empire will be in compliance with all requirements arising from its most recent safety and soundness examination; and
 
 • Each director of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire will have signed and delivered noncompetition or nonsolicitation agreements to Westamerica within 1530 days of the execution of the merger agreement; and
• At least three days prior to the closing, Westamerica will have received a letter of resignation from each director of Kerman State Bank.agreement.

51


     The obligation of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire to complete the merger is subject to satisfaction of the following conditions:

 • The representations of Westamerica will be accurate;
 
 • Westamerica will have performed its obligations under the merger agreement;
 
 • Westamerica will not have suffered any material adverse change;change since December 31, 2003;
 
 • Receipt of an officer’s certificate signed on behalf of Westamerica by its chief financial officer;
 
 • Receipt of approval by the shareholders of Kerman State Bank;Redwood Empire;
 
 • Receipt of a customary legal opinion of Westamerica’s counsel;
 
 • Receipt of an order from the SEC declaring the registration statement of Westamerica effective;
 
 • Receipt of all required consents and approvals from governmental authorities and third parties;authorities;
 
 • Receipt of an opinion that the merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization under the Code;
 
 • No legal impediment to the merger will have arisen, and no litigation, proceeding or investigation shall be pending or threatened before any governmental agency relating to the merger;
 
 • Receipt of a fairness opinion from its financial advisor which is not revoked before mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus.
• The aggregate consideration payable to Kerman State Bank shareholders will not be less than $12,500,000; and
• Kerman State Bank’s allowance for loan losses will not be greater than $3,900,000 as of the effective time.

Extension; waiverWaiver

     At any time prior to the closing of the merger, the parties, by action taken or authorized by each of their board of directors, may, to the extent legally allowed, (1) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other parties, (2) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement or in any document delivered pursuant to it, and (3) waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions contained in the merger agreement. To “waive” means to give up

31


rights. Any agreement on the part of a party to the merger agreement to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if in the form of a written instrument signed on by such party.

Termination

     The merger agreement may be terminated under the following circumstances:

 • by mutual consent of the parties’ boards of directors;
 
 • by either party on or after September 30, 2002,May 25, 2005, if the conditions to completion of the merger are not satisfied through no fault of the terminating party;
 
 • by Westamerica Bancorporation if on or after September 30, 2002,May 25, 2005, any conditions to completion of the merger have not been fulfilled, or, such unfulfilled conditions have been waived by Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire fails to complete the merger;
 
 • by Redwood Empire if on or after May 25, 2005, any conditions to completion of the merger have not been fulfilled, or, such unfulfilled conditions have been waived by Redwood Empire and Westamerica if it becomes awareBancorporation fails to complete the merger;
• By Westamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire upon the failure of any facts or circumstances that it was not awarethe shareholders of onRedwood Empire to give the daterequisite approval of this Agreement at the duly convened Redwood Empire shareholders’ meeting;
• By either party upon a material breach of the merger agreement which materially adversely affect Kerman State Bank taken asby the other party if the breaching party has not cured the breach within 60 days after written notice from the nonbreaching party;
• by either party if any government approval required for the merger has been denied and such denial has become final and nonappealable or any governmental agency of competent jurisdiction has issued a wholefinal nonappealable order permanently enjoining or prohibiting the merger;
• By Westamerica Bancorporation if Redwood Empire shall have breached in any material respect any of its properties, operationsobligations not to solicit, encourage or facilitate a competing proposal;

52


• By Redwood Empire if Westamerica shall have failed to comply with its obligation not to solicit any merger, sale, or other agreement with a third party that would interfere with the merger agreement;
• By Westamerica if the board of directors of Redwood Empire fails to recommend adoption of the merger agreement at the Redwood Empire shareholders’ meeting, or withdraws or modifies or qualifies (or proposed to do so) in a manner adverse to Westamerica its favorable recommendation of the merger agreement or recommends any competing transaction to the shareholders of Redwood Empire or takes any action or made any other statement in connection with the meeting or the merger having such effect;
• By Redwood Empire if its board of directors in the exercise of its fiduciary duties and after consulting with its financial condition;adviser and counsel, determines that a competing proposal is superior to the merger agreement and determines to pursue the competing proposal, provided that Redwood Empire is obligated to pay Westamerica Bancorporation a termination fee of $4,500,000 at the time of such a termination;
• By Westamerica if its board of directors in the exercise of its fiduciary duties and after consulting with a financial adviser and counsel, determines that a competing proposal that would impair Westamerica’s ability to complete the merger with Redwood Empire is superior to the merger agreement and determines to pursue the competing proposal, provided that Westamerica is obligated to pay Redwood Empire a termination fee of $4,500,000 at the time of such a termination;
 
 • by Westamerica if a materially adverse change shall occur after September 30, 2001, in the business, financial condition, results of operations or properties of Kerman State Bank taken as a whole;
• its average closing price is above $60.66, and by WestamericaRedwood Empire if there has been failure on the part of Kerman State Bank to comply with its obligations under the merger agreement;
• by Westamerica if Kerman State Bank enters into a transaction with someone other than Westamerica providing for the acquisition of all or a substantial part of Kerman State Bank or its assets;
• by Westamerica if any person becomes the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Kerman State Bank or any person commences a tender offer or exchange offer to acquire 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Kerman State Bank;
• by Westamerica if the board of directors of Westamerica determines that it would be inadvisable or inexpedient to consummate the merger by reason of any material legal impediment to the merger;
• by Kerman State Bank if on or after September 30, 2002, any conditions to completion of the merger have been fulfilled or waived by Kerman State Bank and Westamerica fails to complete the merger, provided that WestamericaWestamerica’s average closing price is not engaged at the time in litigation to obtain one or more governmental approvals necessary to complete the merger, in which case Westamerica will have additional time to complete that litigation and the merger;
• by Kerman State Bank if it becomes aware of any facts or circumstances that it was not aware of on the date of the merger agreement and which materially adversely affect Westamerica taken as a whole or its properties, operations or financial condition;
• by Kerman State Bank if a materially adverse change shall have occurred since September 30, 2001, in the business, financial condition, results of operations or properties of Westamerica taken as a whole;
• by Kerman State Bank if there has been failure on the part of Westamerica to comply with its obligations under the merger agreement;
• by Kerman State Bank if Westamerica enters into a transaction with someone providing for the acquisition of all or a substantial part of Westamerica or its assets which does not provide for the assumption of the merger agreement.below $40.44.

Expenses; liquidated damagesTermination Fee

     Generally, each party has agreed to bear its own expenses in this transaction. However, Kerman State Bank is obligated to pay $250,000 to Westamerica if Westamerica terminates this Agreement as a result of (i) Kerman State Bank’s failure to obtain, or the revocation of, Kerman State Bank’s fairness opinion, (ii) Kerman State Bank’s failure to obtain approval of its shareholders, (iii) Kerman State Bank’s breach of a

32


representation, warranty or obligation under the merger agreement. Westamerica shall pay Kerman State Bank a fee of $250,000 if Kerman State Bank terminates this Agreement as a result of a breach of a representation, warranty or obligation of Westamerica or Westamerica Bank under the merger agreement.

     If Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp enters into, solicits or encourages a competing transaction or if the board of directors of Redwood Empire Bancorp fails to recommend the merger, Westamerica Bancorporation may terminate the merger agreement and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp will be liable for a break-up fee of $1,500,000.$4,500,000. If Westamerica Bancorporation enters into a competing transaction that precludes Westamerica Bancorporation from completing the merger, Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp may terminate the merger agreement and Westamerica Bancorporation will be liable for a break-up fee of $1,000,000.$4,500,000.

Amendment

     The merger agreement may be amended by the parties at any time prior to the effective time without the approval of the shareholders of Westamerica or Kerman State Bank.Redwood Empire Bancorp. However, the amendment of any terms relating to the form or amount of consideration to be delivered to the Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders requireswould require the approval of the Kerman State Bank Shareholders.Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders.

OPERATIONS FOLLOWING THE MERGER

     UponImmediately upon completion of the merger, Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp will merge with and into Westamerica Bank. Kerman State Bank’s three banking offices located in Kerman, FirebaughBancorporation, National Bank of the Redwoods will merge with and Eastoninto Westamerica Bank and branches of National Bank of the Redwoods will either become officesor be consolidated with branches of Westamerica Bank.

     Westamerica has a branch at 215 South Madera Avenue in Kerman, approximately three blocks or 0.2 miles from the main office of Kerman State Bank at 306 South Madera Avenue. Westamerica expects to consolidate its existing branch into Kerman State Bank’s main office and to consolidate Kerman State Bank’s administrative office with Westamerica’s administrative functions in other offices.

Although we cannot assure you that any specific level of cost savings will be achieved or as to the timing thereof, Westamerica Bancorporation has advised that it currently expects the surviving corporation to achieve certain cost savings in combined operations following completion of the merger. Westamerica Bancorporation expects to achieve savings through consolidation of the Kermancertain branch offices and through elimination of certain executive and back-office positions.

53


INFORMATION ABOUT WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION

General

     Westamerica Bancorporation is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act. The company was incorporated under the laws of the State of California as “Independent Bankshares Corporation” on February 11, 1972. Its headquarters are located at 1108 Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, California 94901, telephone number (415) 257-8000. Its principal administrative offices are located at 4550 Mangels Boulevard, Fairfield, California 94585-1200, and its telephone number is (707) 863-8000. Westamerica Bancorporation provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers in Northern and Central California through its subsidiary bank, Westamerica Bank. The principal communities served are located in Northern and Central California, from Mendocino, Lake, Colusa and Nevada Counties in the North to Kern county in the South. Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s strategic focus is on the banking needs of small businesses. In addition, Westamerica Bancorporation also owns 100 percent of the capital stock of Community Banker Services Corporation, a company engaged in providing the Company and its subsidiaries data processing services and other support functions.

     Westamerica Bancorporation was incorporated under the laws of the State of California in 1972 as “Independent Bankshares Corporation” pursuant to a plan of reorganization among three previously unaffiliated Northern California banks. Westamerica Bancorporation operated as a multi-bank holding company until mid-1983, at which time the then six subsidiary banks were merged into a single bank named Westamerica Bank and the name of the holding company was changed to Westamerica Bancorporation.

33


     Westamerica Bancorporation acquired five additional banks within its immediate market area during the early to mid 1990’s. Under the terms of the merger agreements, Westamerica Bancorporation issued shares of its common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of the acquired institutions. The subsidiary banks acquired were merged with and into Westamerica Bank. These business combinations were accounted for as a pooling-of-interests.

     In April, 1997, Westamerica Bancorporation acquired ValliCorp Holdings, Inc., parent company of ValliWide Bank, the largest independent bank holding company headquartered in Central California. The acquisition became effective through the issuance of shares of Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of ValliCorp. The business combination was accounted for as a pooling-of-interests. ValliWide Bank was merged with and into Westamerica Bank.

     In August, 2000, Westamerica Bancorporation acquired First Counties Bank. The acquisition was valued at approximately $19.7 million and was accounted for using the purchase accounting method. The assets and liabilities of First Counties Bank were fully merged into Westamerica Bank in September 2000. First Counties Bank had $91 million in assets and offices in Lake, Napa, and Colusa counties.Counties.

     In June of 2002 Westamerica Bancorporation acquired Kerman State Bank. The acquisition was valued at approximately $14.6 million and was accounted for using the purchase accounting method. The assets and liabilities of Kerman State Bank were fully merged into Westamerica Bank immediately upon consummation of the merger. Kerman State Bank had $95 million in assets and three offices in Fresno County.

     At December 31, 2001,June 30, 2004, Westamerica Bancorporation had consolidated assets of approximately $3.9$4.6 billion, deposits of approximately $3.2$3.5 billion and shareholders’ equity of approximately $314$329.8 million.

Certain additional business risksAdditional Business Risks

     Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s business, financial condition and operating results can be impacted by a number of factors including, but not limited to, those listed below, any one of which could cause Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s actual results to vary materially from recent results or from Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s anticipated future results.

     A portion of the loan portfolio of Westamerica Bancorporation is dependent on real estate. At December 31, 2001,2003, real estate served as the principal source of collateral with respect to approximately 56 percent56% of Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s loan portfolio. A worsening of current economic conditions, increased economic uncertainty created by the most recent terrorist attacks on the United States and the actions taken

54


in response, or rising interest rates could have an adverse effect on the demand for new loans, the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, the value of real estate and other collateral securing loans and the value of the available for sale securities portfolio, as well as Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s financial condition and results of operations in general and the market value of Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s common stock. Acts of nature, including earthquakes and floods, which may cause uninsured damage and other loss of value to real estate that secures these loans, may also negatively impact Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s financial condition.

     The earnings and growth of Westamerica Bancorporation are affected not only by local market area factors and general economic conditions, but also by government monetary and fiscal policies. Such policies influence the growth of loans, investments and deposits and also affect interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The nature and impact of future changes in such policies on the business and earnings of Westamerica Bancorporation cannot be predicted. Additionally, state and federal tax policies can impact banking organizations.

     As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities in the United States, the business of Westamerica Bancorporation is particularly susceptible to being affected by the enactment of federal and state legislation which may have the effect of increasing or decreasing the cost of doing business, modifying permissible activities or enhancing the competitive position of other financial institutions. Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on the business and prospects of Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation.

     Westamerica Bancorporation is also subject to certain operations risks, including, but not limited to, data processing system failures and errors and customer or employee fraud. Westamerica Bancorporation maintains a system of internal controls to mitigate against such occurrences and maintains insurance coverage for such risks, but should such an event occur that is not prevented or detected by Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s internal controls, is not insured or is in excess of applicable insurance limits, it could have a significant adverse impact on Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

34


     Shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock eligible for future sale could have a dilutive effect on the market for Westamerica Bancorporation common stock and could adversely affect the market price. The articles of incorporation of Westamerica Bancorporation authorize the issuance of 150 million shares of common stock (and two classes of one million shares each, denominated “Class B Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock”, respectively) of which approximately 34.2 million were outstanding at December 31, 2001.2003. Pursuant to its stock option plans, at December 31, 2001,2003, Westamerica Bancorporation had exercisable options outstanding for 1.6 million shares. As of December 31, 2001,2003, 1.4 million additional shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock remained available for grants under Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s stock option plans (and stock purchase plan). Sales of substantial amounts of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock in the public market could adversely affect its market price of common stock.

Employees

     At December 31, 2001, the company2003, Westamerica Bancorporation and its subsidiaries employed 1,066 full-time equivalent staff. Employee relations are believed to be good.

Branch officesOffices and facilitiesFacilities

     Westamerica’s banks areWestamerica Bank is engaged in the banking business through 9088 offices in 2322 counties in Northern and Central California including eleven13 offices eachin Fresno County, 12 in Marin County and in Fresno County, nine in Sonoma County, seven in Napa County, six each in Solano, Kern and Stanislaus andCounties, five each in Lake, Contra Costa and Solano Counties, five in Lake County, three each in MendocinoAlameda and Sacramento Counties, two each in Mendocino, Nevada, Placer and Tulare TuolumneCounties, and Alameda Counties, one each in Colusa, Merced, San Francisco, Tuolumne, Kings, Madera, Merced,and Yolo and Colusa Counties. AllWestamerica Bank believes all of its offices are constructed and equipped to meet prescribed security requirements.

     The companyWestamerica owns 3130 branch office locations and one administrative buildingfacility and leases 69 offices and other68 facilities. Most of the leases contain multiple renewal options and provisions for rental increases, principally for changes in the cost of living index, property taxes and maintenance.

55


The effectEffect of government policyGovernment Policy on bankingBanking

     The earnings and growth of Westamerica Bancorporation are affected not only by local market area factors and general economic conditions, but also by government monetary and fiscal policies. Such policies influence the growth of loans, investments and deposits and also affect interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The nature and impact of future changes in such policies on the business and earnings of Westamerica Bancorporation cannot be predicted. Additionally, state and federal tax policies can impact banking organizations. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities in the United States, the business of Westamerica Bancorporation is particularly susceptible to being affected by the enactment of federal and state legislation which may have the effect of increasing or decreasing the cost of doing business, modifying permissible activities or enhancing the competitive position of other financial institutions. Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on the business and prospects of Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation.

Regulation and supervisionSupervision of bank holding companiesBank Holding Companies

     The following is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes and regulations applicable to Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s or the Westamerica Bank’s business. The description of statutory and regulatory provisions is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions.

     Moreover, major new legislation and other regulatory changes affecting Westamerica Bancorporation, Westamerica Bank, banking, and the financial services industry in general have occurred in the last several years and can be expected to occur in the future. The nature, timing and impact of new and amended laws and regulations cannot be accurately predicted.

     Westamerica Bancorporation is a bank holding company subject to the Bank Holding Company Act. Westamerica Bancorporation reports to, registers with, and may be examined by, the FRB. The FRB also has the authority to examine Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s subsidiaries. The costs of any examination by the FRB are payable by Westamerica.

35


Westamerica Bancorporation.

     Westamerica Bancorporation is a bank holding company within the meaning of Section 3700 of the California Financial Code. As such, Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank are subject to examination by, and may be required to file reports with, the Commissioner.Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the State of California.

     The FRB has significant supervisory and regulatory authority over Westamerica Bancorporation and its affiliates. The FRB requires Westamerica Bancorporation to maintain certain levels of capital. See “Capital Standards.” The FRB also has the authority to take enforcement action against any bank holding company such as Westamerica Bancorporation that commits any unsafe or unsound practice, or violates certain laws, regulations or conditions imposed in writing by the FRB. See “Prompt Corrective Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms.” Under the Bank Holding Company Act, a company generally must obtain the prior approval of the FRB before it exercises a controlling influence over a bank, or acquires directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Thus, Westamerica Bancorporation is required to obtain the prior approval of the FRB before it acquires, merges or consolidates with any bank or bank holding company. Any company seeking to acquire, merge or consolidate with Westamerica Bancorporation also would be required to obtain the prior approval of the FRB.

     Westamerica Bancorporation is generally prohibited under the Bank Holding Company Act from acquiring ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than banking, managing banks, or providing services to affiliates of the holding Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation. However, a bank holding company, with the approval of the FRB, may engage, or acquire the voting shares of companies engaged, in activities that the FRB has determined to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. A bank holding company must demonstrate that the benefits to the public of the proposed activity will outweigh the possible adverse effects associated with such activity.

56


     A bank holding company may acquire banks in states other than its home state without regard to the permissibility of such acquisitions under state law, but subject to any state requirement that Westamerica Bank has been organized and operating for a minimum period of time, not to exceed five years, and the requirement that the bank holding company, prior to or following the proposed acquisition, controls no more than 10% of the total amount of deposits of insured depository institutions in the United States and no more than 30% of such deposits in that state (or such lesser or greater amount set by state law). Banks may also merge across states lines, thereby creating interstate branches. Furthermore, a bank is now able to open new branches in a state in which it does not already have banking operations, if the laws of such state permit such de novo branching.

     Under California law, (a) out-of-state banks that wish to establish a California branch office to conduct core banking business must first acquire an existing five year old California bank or industrial bank by merger or purchase, (b) California state-chartered banks are empowered to conduct various authorized branch-like activities on an agency basis through affiliated and unaffiliated insured depository institutions in California and other states and (c) the commissioner is authorized to approve an interstate acquisition or merger that would result in a deposit concentration exceeding 30% if the Commissioner finds that the transaction is consistent with public convenience and advantage. However, a state bank chartered in a state other than California may not enter California by purchasing a California branch office of a California bank or industrial bank without purchasing the entire entity or by establishing a de novo California bank.

     The FRB generally prohibits a bank holding company from declaring or paying a cash dividend that would impose undue pressure on the capital of subsidiary banks or would be funded only through borrowing or other arrangements which might adversely affect a bank holding company’s financial position. Under the FRB policy, a bank holding company should not continue its existing rate of cash dividends on its common stock unless its net income is sufficient to fully fund each dividend and its prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with its capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. See the section entitled “Restrictions on dividends and other distributions” for additional restrictions on the ability of Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank to pay dividends.

     Transactions between Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank are subject to a number of other restrictions. FRB policies forbid the payment by bank subsidiaries of management fees, which are unreasonable in amount

36


or exceed the fair market value of the services rendered (or, if no market exists, actual costs plus a reasonable profit). Subject to certain limitations, depository institution subsidiaries of bank holding companies may extend credit to, invest in the securities of, purchase assets from, or issue a guarantee, acceptance, or letter of credit on behalf of, an affiliate, provided that the aggregate of such transactions with affiliates may not exceed 10% of the capital stock and surplus of the institution, and the aggregate of such transactions with all affiliates may not exceed 20% of the capital stock and surplus of such institution. Westamerica Bancorporation may only borrow from Westamerica Bank if the loan is secured by marketable obligations with a value of a designated amount in excess of the loan. Further, Westamerica Bancorporation may not sell a low-quality asset to a depository institution subsidiary. Comprehensive amendments to federal regulations governing bank holding companies and change in bank control (Regulation Y) became effective in 1997, and are intended to improve the competitiveness of bank holding companies by, among other things: (i) expanding the list of permissible nonbanking activities in which well-run bank holding companies may engage without prior FRB approval, (ii) streamlining the procedures for well-run bank holding companies to obtain approval to engage in other nonbanking activities and (iii) eliminating most of the anti-tying restrictions prescribed for bank holding companies and their nonbank subsidiaries. Amended Regulation Y also provides for a streamlined and expedited review process for bank acquisition proposals submitted by well-run bank holding companies and eliminates certain duplicative reporting requirements when there has been a further change in bank control or in bank directors or officers after an earlier approved change. These changes to Regulation Y are subject to numerous qualifications, limitations and restrictions. In order for a bank holding company to qualify as “well-run,” both it and the insured depository institutions which it controls must meet the “well capitalized” and “well managed” criteria in Regulation Y.

     To qualify as “well capitalized,” the bank holding company must, on a consolidated basis: (i) maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater; (ii) maintain a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater;

57


and (iii) not be subject to any order by the FRB to meet a specified capital level. Its lead insured depository institution must be well capitalized as that term is defined in the capital adequacy regulations of the applicable bank regulator, 80% of the total risk-weighted assets held by its insured depository institutions must be held by institutions which are well capitalized, and none of its insured depository institutions may be undercapitalized.

     To qualify as “well managed”: (i) each of the bank holding company, its lead depository institution and its depository institutions holding 80% of the total risk-weighted assets of all its depository institutions at their most recent examination or review must have received a composite rating, rating for management and rating for compliance which were at least satisfactory; (ii) none of the bank holding company’s depository institutions may have received one of the two lowest composite ratings; and (iii) neither the bank holding company nor any of its depository institutions during the previous 12 months may have been subject to a formal enforcement order or action.

     Transactions between Westamerica Bancorporation and Westamerica Bank are restricted under Regulation W, which became effective on April 1, 2003. The regulation codifies prior interpretations of the FRB and its staff under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. In general, subject to certain specified exemptions, a bank or its subsidiaries are limited in their ability to engage in “covered transactions” with affiliates: (a) to an amount equal to 10% of the bank’s capital and surplus, in the case of covered transactions with any one affiliate; and (b) to an amount equal to 20% of the bank’s capital and surplus, in the case of covered transactions with all affiliates. Westamerica Bancorporation is considered to be an affiliate of Westamerica Bank.

     A “covered transaction” includes, among other things, a loan or extension of credit to an affiliate; a purchase of securities issued by an affiliate; a purchase of assets from an affiliate, with some exceptions; and the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate.

     On March 11, 2000, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLBA”), or the Financial Services Act of 1999 became effective. The GLBA repealed provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act, which had prohibited commercial banks and securities firms from affiliating with each other and engaging in each other’s businesses. Thus, many of the barriers prohibiting affiliations between commercial banks and securities firms have been eliminated.

     The Bank Holding Company Act was also amended by the GLBA to allow new “financial holding companies” (“FHCs”) to offer banking, insurance, securities and other financial products to consumers. Specifically, the GLBA amended section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act in order to provide for a framework for the engagement in new financial activities. A bank holding company may elect to become a FHC if all its subsidiary depository institutions are well capitalized and well managed. If these requirements are met, a bank holding company may file a certification to that effect with the FRB and declare that it elects to become a FHC. After the certification and declaration is filed, the FHC may engage either de novo or though an acquisition in any activity that has been determined by the FRB to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity. bankBank holding companies may engage in financial activities without prior notice to the FRB if those activities qualify under the new list of permissible activities in section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act. However, notice must be given to the FRB within 30 days after a FHC has commenced one or more of the financial activities. Westamerica Bancorporation has not elected to become a FHC.

37


     Under the GLBA, Federal Reserve member banks, subject to various requirements, as well as national banks, are permitted to engage through “financial subsidiaries” in certain financial activities permissible for affiliates of FHCs. However, to be able to engage in such activities Westamerica Bank must also be well capitalized and well managed and have received at least a “satisfactory” rating in its most recent CRA examination. Westamerica Bancorporation cannot be certain of the effect of the foregoing recently enacted legislation on its business, although there is likely to be consolidation among financial services institutions and increased competition for Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation.

Bank supervisionSupervision and regulationRegulation

     Westamerica Bank is a California state-chartered bank, is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and is a member bank of the FRB. As such, Westamerica Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination by the DFICalifornia Department of Financial Institutions and the

58


FRB. As a member bank of the FRB, Westamerica Bank’s primary federal regulator is the FRB. The regulations of these agencies affect most aspects of Westamerica Bank’s business and prescribe permissible types of loans and investments, the amount of required reserves, requirements for branch offices, the permissible scope of its activities and various other requirements.

     In addition to federal banking law, Westamerica Bank is also subject to applicable provisions of California law. Under California law, Westamerica Bank is subject to various restrictions on, and requirements regarding, its operations and administration including the maintenance of branch offices and automated teller machines, capital requirements, deposits and borrowings, stockholder rights and duties, and investment and lending activities.

     California law permits a state chartered bank to invest in the stock and securities of other corporations, subject to a state-chartered bank receiving either general authorization or, depending on the amount of the proposed investment, specific authorization from the Commissioner. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (“FDICIA”), however, imposes limitations on the activities and equity investments of state chartered, federally insured banks. FDICIA also prohibits a state bank from engaging as a principal in any activity that is not permissible for a national bank, unless Westamerica Bank is adequately capitalized and the FDIC approves the activity after determining that such activity does not pose a significant risk to the deposit insurance fund. The FDIC rules on activities generally permit subsidiaries of banks, without prior specific FDIC authorization, to engage in those activities which have been approved by the FRB for bank holding companies because such activities are so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto. Other activities generally require specific FDIC prior approval, and the FDIC may impose additional restrictions on such activities on a case-by-case basis in approving applications to engage in otherwise impermissible activities.

Capital standardsStandards

     The federal banking agencies have risk-based capital adequacy guidelines intended to provide a measure of capital adequacy that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking organization’s operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets, and transactions such as letters of credit and recourse arrangements, which are recorded as off balance sheet items. Under these guidelines, nominal dollar amounts of assets and credit equivalent amounts of off balance sheet items are multiplied by one of several risk adjustment percentages, which range from 0% for assets with low credit risk, such as certain U.S. government securities, to 100% for assets with relatively higher credit risk, such as certain loans.

     In determining the capital level Westamerica Bank is required to maintain, the federal banking agencies do not, in all respects, follow generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and have special rules which have the effect of reducing the amount of capital they will recognize for purposes of determining its capital adequacy. A banking organization’s risk-based capital ratios are obtained by dividing its qualifying capital by its total risk-adjusted assets and off balance sheet items. The regulators measure risk-adjusted assets and off balance sheet items against both total qualifying capital (the sum of Tier 1 capital and limited amounts of Tier 2 capital) and Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital consists of common stock, retained earnings, qualifying

38


noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in certain subsidiaries, less most other intangible assets and other adjustments. Net unrealized losses on available for sale equity securities with readily determinable fair value must be deducted in determining Tier 1 capital. For Tier 1 capital purposes, deferred tax assets which can only be realized if an institution earns sufficient taxable income in the future are limited to the amount that the institution is expected to realize within one year, or ten percent of Tier 1 capital, whichever is less. Tier 2 capital may consist of a limited amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses, term preferred stock and other types of preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 capital, hybrid capital instruments and mandatory convertible debt securities, term subordinated debt and certain other instruments with some characteristics of equity and limited amounts of unrealized holding gains on equity securities. The inclusion of elements of Tier 2 capital are subject to certain other requirements and limitations of the federal banking agencies. The federal banking agencies require a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets and off balance sheet items of 8%, and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average risk-adjusted assets and off balance sheet items of 4%.

     In addition to the risk-based guidelines, the federal banking agencies require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average total assets, referred to as the leverage capital ratio. For a banking organization rated in the highest of the five categories used to rate banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets must be 3%. It is improbable, however, that an institution with a 3% leverage ratio would receive the highest rating since a strong capital position is a significant part of the regulators’ rating. For all banking organizations not rated in the highest category, the minimum leverage ratio must be at least 100 to 200 basis points above the 3% minimum. Thus, the effective minimum leverage ratio, for all practical purposes, must be at least 4% or 5%. In addition to these uniform risk-based capital guidelines and leverage ratios which apply across the industry, the regulators have the discretion to set individual minimum capital requirements for specific institutions at rates significantly above the minimum guidelines and ratios.

     As of December 31, 2001, Westamerica’s and Westamerica Bank’s respective ratios exceeded applicable regulatory requirements. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for capital ratios of Westamerica and Westamerica Bank, compared to the standards for well capitalized depository institutions and for minimum capital requirements.

The federal banking agencies take into consideration concentrations of credit risk and risks from nontraditional activities, as well as an institution’s ability to manage those risks, when determining the adequacy of an institution’s capital. This evaluation is made as a part of the institution’s regular safety and soundness examination. The federal banking agencies also consider interest rate risk (when the interest rate sensitivity of an institution’s assets does not match the sensitivity of its liabilities or its off balance sheet position) in evaluation of a bank’s capital adequacy.

As of December 31, 2003, Westamerica Bancorporation’s and Westamerica Bank’s respective ratios exceeded applicable regulatory requirements.

Prompt corrective actionCorrective Action and other enforcement mechanismsOther Enforcement Mechanisms

     FDICIA requires each federal banking agency to take prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of insured depository institutions, including but not limited to those that fall below one or more prescribed minimum capital ratios. The law required each federal banking agency to promulgate regulations defining the following five categories in which an insured depository institution will be placed, based on the level of its capital ratios: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.

3959


     Under the prompt corrective action provisions of FDICIA, an insured depository institution generally will be classified in the following categories based on the capital measures indicated below:

                          
TotalTier 1TotalTier 1
Risk-BasedRisk-BasedLeverageRisk-BasedRisk-BasedLeverage
CapitalCapitalRatioCapitalCapitalRatio






Well capitalizedWell capitalized 10.00% 6.00% 5.00%Well capitalized 10.00% 6.00% 5.00%
Adequately capitalizedAdequately capitalized 8.00 4.00 4.00 Adequately capitalized 8.00 4.00 4.00 
Undercapitalized (less than)Undercapitalized (less than) 8.00 4.00 4.00 Undercapitalized (less than) 8.00 4.00 4.00 
Significantly undercapitalized (less than)Significantly undercapitalized (less than) 6.00 3.00 3.00 Significantly undercapitalized (less than) 6.00 3.00 3.00 
Critically undercapitalizedCritically undercapitalized Critically undercapitalized 
Tangible equity/total assets (less than) 2.00 Tangible equity/ total assets (less than) 2.00 

     An institution that, based upon its capital levels, is classified as “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized” or “undercapitalized” may be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition or an unsafe or unsound practice warrants such treatment. At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is subject to more restrictions.

     In addition to measures taken under the prompt corrective action provisions, commercial banking organizations may be subject to potential enforcement actions by the federal banking agencies for unsafe or unsound practices in conducting their businesses or for violations of any law, rule, regulation or any condition imposed in writing by the agency or any written agreement with the agency. Enforcement actions may include the imposition of a conservator or receiver, the issuance of a cease-and-desist order that can be judicially enforced, the termination of insurance of deposits (in the case of a depository institution), the imposition of civil money penalties, the issuance of directives to increase capital, the issuance of formal and informal agreements, the issuance of removal and prohibition orders against institution-affiliated parties and the enforcement of such actions through injunctions or restraining orders based upon a judicial determination that the agency would be harmed if such equitable relief was not granted. Additionally, a holding Westamerica’s inabilitythat Westamerica Bancorporation is unable to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banking organizations could serve as an additional basis for a regulatory action against the holding Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation.

Safety and soundness standardsSoundness Standards

     FDICIA also implemented certain specific restrictions on transactions and required federal banking regulators to adopt overall safety and soundness standards for depository institutions related to internal control, loan underwriting and documentation and asset growth. Among other things, FDICIA limits the interest rates paid on deposits by undercapitalized institutions, restricts the use of brokered deposits, limits the aggregate extensions of credit by a depository institution to an executive officer, director, principal shareholder or related interest, and reduces deposit insurance coverage for deposits offered by undercapitalized institutions for deposits by certain employee benefits accounts. The federal banking agencies may require an institution to submit to an acceptable compliance plan as well as have the flexibility to pursue other more appropriate or effective courses of action given the specific circumstances and severity of an institution’s noncompliance with one or more standards.

     Federal banking agencies require banks to maintain adequate valuation allowances for potential credit losses. Westamerica Bank has an internal staff that continually reviews loan quality and ultimately reports to its board of directors. This analysis includes a detailed review of the classification and categorization of problem loans, assessment of the overall quality and collectibility of the loan portfolio, consideration of loan loss experience, trends in problem loans, concentration of credit risk, and current economic conditions, particularly in Westamerica Bank’s market areas. Based on this analysis, management, with the review and approval of the Westamerica Bank board of directors, determines the adequate level of allowance required. The allowance is allocated to different segments of the loan portfolio, but the entire allowance is available for the loan portfolio in its entirety.

60


Restrictions on dividendsDividends and other distributionsOther Distributions

     The power of the board of directors of an insured depository institution to declare a cash dividend or other distribution with respect to capital is subject to statutory and regulatory restrictions which limit the amount available for such distribution depending upon the earnings, financial condition and cash needs of the institution, as well as general business conditions. FDICIA prohibits insured depository institutions from paying management fees to any controlling persons or, with certain limited exceptions, making capital distributions, including dividends, if, after such transaction, the institution would be undercapitalized.

40


     In addition to the restrictions imposed under federal law, banks chartered under California law generally may only pay cash dividends to the extent such payments do not exceed the lesser of retained earnings of the bank or the bank’s net income for its last three fiscal years (less any distributions to shareholders during this period). In the event a bank desires to pay cash dividends in excess of such amount, the bank may pay a cash dividend with the prior approval of the Commissioner in an amount not exceeding the greatest of the bank’s retained earnings, the bank’s net income for its last fiscal year or the bank’s net income for its current fiscal year.

     The federal banking agencies also have the authority to prohibit a depository institution from engaging in business practices which are considered to be unsafe or unsound, possibly including payment of dividends or other payments under certain circumstances even if such payments are not expressly prohibited by statute.

Premiums for deposit insuranceDeposit Insurance and assessmentsAssessments for examinationsExaminations

     Westamerica Bank’s deposits are insured by the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) administered by the FDIC. FDICIA established several mechanisms to increase funds to protect deposits insured by the BIF administered by the FDIC. The FDIC is authorized to borrow up to $30 billion from the United States Treasury; up to 90% of the fair market value of assets of institutions acquired by the FDIC as receiver from the Federal Financing Bank; and from depository institutions which are members of the BIF. Any borrowings not repaid by asset sales are to be repaid through insurance premiums assessed to member institutions. Such premiums must be sufficient to repay any borrowed funds within 15 years and provide insurance fund reserves of $1.25 for each $100 of insured deposits. FDICIA also provides authority for special assessments against insured deposits. No assurance can be given at this time as to what the future level of insurance premiums will be.

CRA and fair lending developmentsFair Lending Developments

     Westamerica Bank is subject to certain fair lending requirements and reporting obligations involving home mortgage lending operations and Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) activities. The CRA generally requires the federal banking agencies to evaluate the record of a financial institution in meeting the credit needs of their local communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. In addition to substantive penalties and corrective measures that may be required for a violation of certain fair lending laws, the federal banking agencies may take compliance with such laws and CRA into account when regulating and supervising other activities.

Financial privacy legislationPrivacy Legislation

     The GLBA, in addition to the previously described changes in permissible nonbanking activities permitted to banks, bank holding companies and FHCs, also required the federal banking agencies, among other federal regulatory agencies, to adopt regulations governing the privacy of consumer financial information. The FRB adopted such regulations with an effective date of November 13, 2000, and a date of full compliance with the regulations of July 1, 2001. Westamerica Bank is subject to the FRB’s regulations.

     The regulations impose three main requirements established by the GLBA. First, a banking organization must provide initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates, such as Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation. Second, banking organizations must provide annual notices of their privacy policies to their current customers. Third, banking organizations must provide a reasonable method for consumers to opt-out of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties.

     In connection with the regulations governing the privacy of consumer financial information, the federal banking agencies, including the FRB, adopted guidelines for safeguarding confidential customer information, effective on July 1, 2001. The guidelines require banking organizations to establish an information security program to: (1) identify and assess the risks that may threaten customer information; (2) develop a written plan containing policies and procedures to manage and control these risks; (3) implement and test the plan; and (4) adjust the plan on a continuing basis to account for changes in technology, the sensitivity of customer

4161


information, and internal or external threats. The guidelines also outline the responsibilities of directors of banking organizations in overseeing the protection of customer information.

Recently enacted legislation and regulationsUSA PATRIOT Act

     On October 26, 2001, the President of the United States signed into law the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 or the USA Patriot“USA PATRIOT Act. Title III of the Act is the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001. It includes numerous provisions for fighting international money laundering and blocking terrorist access to the U.S. financial system. The goal of Title III is to prevent the U.S. financial system and the U.S. clearing mechanisms from being used by parties suspected of terrorism, terrorist financing and money laundering.

     The provisions of Title III of the USA PatriotPATRIOT Act whichthat affect banking organizations, including Westamerica Bank, are generally set forth as amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act. These provisions relate principally to U.S. banking organizationsorganizations’ relationships with foreign banks and with persons who are resident outside the United States. The USA PatriotPATRIOT Act does not immediately impose any new filing or reporting obligations for banking organizations, but does require certain additional due diligence and record keepingrecordkeeping practices. Some requirements take effect without the issuance of regulations. Other provisions are to bewere implemented through regulations that will be promulgated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, (the Treasury), in consultation with the FRB and other federal financial institutions regulators.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     At this time, numerous provisionsOn July 30, 2002, the U.S. Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Title III2002. The stated goals of Sarbanes-Oxley are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. Sarbanes-Oxley generally applies to all companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., that file or are required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

     Sarbanes-Oxley includes specific additional disclosure requirements and new corporate governance rules, requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules and mandates further studies of certain issues. Sarbanes-Oxley represents significant federal involvement in matters traditionally left to state regulatory systems, such as the regulation of the USA Patriot Act require implementing regulationsaccounting profession, and to state corporate law, such as the relationship between a board of directors and management and between a board of directors and its committees and public company shareholders.

     Sarbanes-Oxley addresses, among other matters: (i) independent audit committees for reporting companies whose securities are listed on national exchanges or interpretationsautomated quotation systems and expanded duties and responsibilities for audit committees; (ii) certification of financial statements by the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer; (iii) the forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the Treasury. Consequently,sale of an issuer’s securities by directors and senior officers in the effect12-month period following initial publication of any financial statements that later require restatement; (iv) a prohibition on insider trading during pension plan black out periods; (v) disclosure of off-balance sheet transactions; (vi) a prohibition on personal loans to directors and officers under most circumstances; (vii) expedited electronic filing requirements related to trading by insiders in an issuer’s securities on Form 4; (viii) disclosure of a code of ethics and filing a Form 8-K for a change or waiver of such code; (ix) accelerated filing of periodic reports; (x) the formation of the USA Patriot ActPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) to oversee public accounting firms and the audit of public companies that are subject to the securities laws; (xi) auditor independence; (xii) internal control evaluation and reporting; and (xiii) various increased criminal penalties for violations of securities laws.

     Given the extensive role of the SEC, the PCAOB and the exchanges in implementing rules relating to Sarbanes-Oxley’s new requirements, the federalization of certain elements traditionally within the sphere of state corporate law, the impact of Sarbanes-Oxley on reporting companies will be significant. Many of the business ofnew rules promulgated by the SEC, the PCAOB and the exchanges became final during 2003 and are being implemented during 2004. As a result, it is impossible to predict with any precision how these new rules, regulations and changes in corporate law and governance will finally impact public companies including Westamerica and Westamerica Bank cannot be accurately predicted at this time.Bancorporation.

62


Pending Legislation and Regulations

     Various legislation and regulations, including proposals to change substantially the financial institution regulatory system, is from time to time introduced in Congress and by regulatory agencies. These regulations and legislation may change the regulatory operating environment of Westamerica Bancorporation in substantial and unpredictable ways. For example, it could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions.

     Certain pending legislative proposals include bills to permit banks to pay interest on business checking accounts, to cap consumer liability for stolen debit cards, to end certain predatory lending practices, to allow the payment of interest on reserves that financial institutions must keep with FRB and to give judges the authority to force high-income borrowers to repay their debts rather than cancel them through bankruptcy. A proposal to merge the FDIC’s two funds, the BIF and the Savings Association Insurance Fund, is also being discussed.

While the effect of such proposed legislation on the business of Westamerica Bancorporation cannot be accurately predicted at this time, it seems likely that a significant amount of consolidating in banking industry will continue.

     Additional information about Westamerica Bancorporation and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this document. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” on page 78.

63


INFORMATION ABOUT KERMAN STATE BANKREDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP

General

     Kerman StateRedwood Empire Bancorp is a California corporation, headquartered in Santa Rosa, California. Its principal subsidiary is National Bank engages in the general commercial banking business in the Central San Joaquin Valley in the State of California from its headquarters banking office located at 306 South Madera Avenue, Kerman, California and its branches located at 5751 South Elm Street, Easton, California, and 1312 P Street, Firebaugh, California. Kerman State Bank is an insured bank under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and is not a member of the FRB.Redwoods, a national bank which was chartered in 1985. In addition, National Bank of the Redwoods has three wholly-owned California chartered subsidiaries, Valley Mortgage Corporation, Allied Diversified Credit, and Redwood Merchant Services, Inc., all of which are currently inactive.

     Kerman State Bank conducts aRedwood Empire Bancorp operates in two principal industry segments: core community banking and merchant card services. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s core community banking industry segment includes commercial, banking business which includes accepting demand, savings and time deposits and makingcommercial real estate, commercial,construction, and installment loans. Although Kerman State Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, a significant portion of its customers’ ability to repay loans is dependent upon the agricultural sector, as its customer base is centralized in one of the largest agricultural areas in the world. It is generally Kerman State Bank’s policy to fully collateralize loans; however, this is determined on an individual basis, taking into account the financial stability of each borrower. The collateral held by Kerman State Bank may include cash, equipment, accounts receivable, inventories, securities and real estate.

42


     At December 31, 2001, the total of Kerman State Bank’s installment and credit card loans outstanding were $1,853,181, the total of commercial loans outstanding was $12,556,091, the total of agricultural loans outstanding was $28,536,807, and the total of real estate loans outstanding was $12,556,091 (including $12,050,560 in loans secured by farmland, including farmpermanent residential and other improvements), representing 5%, 20%, 44% and 33%, respectively, of Kerman State Bank’s loan portfolio.

     The majority of Kerman State Bank’s real estate lending activities are limited to Central San Joaquin Valley farm, commercial and residential properties. Real estate secured loans are generally written at fixed rates of interest and have maturities ranging from one to seven years. Variable rate real estate loans may have longer maturities. Kerman State Bank, from time to time, makes interim construction loans to well-established contractors and/or developers who have take-out financing. Kerman State Bank generally does not do take-out loans or permanent real estate financing. However, permanent financing may be extended on income propertyalong with sufficient cash flow to support debt payments. Real estate loans are usually extended on properties at 70-80% of the cost or appraised value of the property, whichever is lowest. At December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank’s real estate loan portfolio consisted of approximately 49% farm properties, 26% residential properties and 25% commercial properties.

     Real estate values remained relatively stable during 2001 with a slight upturn in market values for residential properties in the fourth quarter. Commercial property values also remained stable, but sales activity continued to be weak throughout the year.

     From 1999 through 2001, Kerman State Bank charged off five real estate loans in the aggregate amount of approximately $1,100,000 (in addition to charge-offs of $537,000 for non-real estate loans). Additionally, as of December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank held three properties as other real estate owned (“OREO”), consisting mostly of real property acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure with an aggregate carrying value of $2,492,000.

     Kerman State Bank’s deposits are obtained from local individuals, business and farmers. Kerman State Bank historically has attracted a significant portion of its total deposits in the form of time certificates. These large deposits represent approximately 41% of the total deposits of Kerman State Bank. The vast majority of these deposits have been maintained with Kerman State Bank for many years with no appreciable evidence of volatility. Within that group of depositors are several relationships that, in aggregate may represent a concentration. Kerman State Bank monitors those relationships and factors the potential adverse effect of withdrawal into its liquidity management program. Other than jumbo deposits there are no other identified deposit segments which would have a material adverse effect on the business of Kerman State Bank.

     Kerman State Bank entertains and grants various extensions of credit to local farmers. Since raisin production is the principal crop in Kerman State Bank’s market area, Kerman State Bank’s loan portfolio contains a significant amount of loans that rely on raisin proceeds for repayment. The risks of an industry concentration is that if the particular industry suffers an economic downturn the ability to repay loans to specific borrowers within the industry may be negatively impacted. This concentration is closely monitored and the Kerman State Bank allocates within its loan loss reserve methodology a specific amount believed reasonable for additional loss potential. Also, the Kerman State Bank maintains a capital ratio percentage related to the total amount of raisin reliant loans at any given time. Other than the concentration within the raisin industry, and/or agricultural lending in general, there are no other identified loan portfolio segments, which would have a material adverse effect on the business of Kerman State Bank.

     In order to attract loan and deposit business from individuals and small businesses, Kerman State Bank maintains lobby hours from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through Thursday and from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Friday. Kerman State Bank also maintains drive-up window hours from 8:30 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Thursday and from 8:30 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Friday. One automated teller machine (one walk-up) operates 24 hours per day, seven days per week, at Kerman State Bank’s headquarters banking office.

43


     Kerman State Bank relies substantially on local promotional activity, personal contacts by its officers, directors and employees, referrals by its shareholders, extended hours, personalized service and its reputation in the communities it serves to compete effectively.

all depository activities. As of December 31, 2001, there were three operating bank offices2003, Redwood Empire Bancorp’s merchant card services industry group provided credit card settlement services for approximately 35,000 merchants located throughout the United States.

     National Bank of the Redwoods provides its core community banking services through seven retail branches, of which five are located in Kerman,Sonoma County, one in Mendocino County and one in Lake County, all in Northern California. KermanNational Bank of the Redwoods generally extends commercial loans to professionals and businesses with annual revenues of less than $20 million. These commercial loans are primarily for working capital and asset acquisitions. National Bank of the Redwoods emphasizes the origination of commercial real estate loans within its primary market area. Such loans are either owner-occupied or investor owned and are usually supported by long-term leases. Properties which secure loans within the commercial real estate portfolio include office buildings, retail centers and industrial buildings. National Bank of the Redwoods also contains one officeoriginates commercial and residential construction loans for its portfolio along with permanent single family and multi-family residential loans. National Bank of the Redwoods’ primary targeted lending market area includes the California counties north of San Francisco.

     The primary sources of funds for National Bank of the Redwoods’ commercial and residential lending programs are local deposits, proceeds from loan sales, loan payments, and other borrowings. National Bank of the Redwoods attracts deposits primarily from local businesses, professionals and retail customers. National Bank of the Redwoods’ primary deposit market areas include the counties of Sonoma, Mendocino and Lake. Sonoma, Mendocino and Lake Counties have benefited from the migration of population and businesses into the area, as well as growth in established firms and industries. These counties have generally exceeded the growth in population and economic activity of California as a savings and loan association. Firebaugh has two operating bank offices. Eastonwhole. National Bank of the Redwoods generally does not contain any offices of banks or savingspurchase deposits through deposit brokers and loan associations. Kerman State Bank’s primary service area is oriented to small businesses and agriculture.

The banking business in California generally, and in Kerman State Bank’s primary service area specifically, is highly competitive with respect to both loans and deposits, and is dominated by a relatively small number of major banks with many offices operating over a wide geographic area. Among the advantages such major banks have over Kerman State Bank are their ability to finance wide-ranging advertising campaigns and to allocate their investment assets, including loans, to regions of higher yield and demand. Such banks offer certain services such as international banking and trust services which are not offered directly by Kerman State Bank but which Kerman State Bank has offered indirectly through correspondent institutions when its customers sought these services. In addition, by virtue of their greater total capitalization, such banks have substantially higher lending limits than Kerman State Bank. Legal lending limits to an individual customer are limited to a percentage of a bank’s total capital accounts. As of December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank’s loan limits to individual customers were approximately $1,927,270 for unsecured loans and $5,144,730 for unsecured and secured loans combined. For borrowers desiring loans in excess of Kerman State Bank’s lending limits, Kerman State Bank may, in the future, make such loans on a participation basis with its correspondent banks taking the amount of loans in excess of Kerman State Bank’s lending limits. In other cases, Kerman State Bank may refer such borrowers to larger banks or other lending institutions.

Supervision and regulation

     As a California state-licensed bank, Kerman State Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and periodic examination by the DFI and the FDIC. Kerman State Bank is not a member of the FRB, but is nevertheless subject to certain regulations of the Federal Reserve. Kerman State Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC to the maximum amount permitted by law, which is currently $100,000 per depositor in most cases.

     The regulations of these state and federal bank regulatory agencies govern most aspects of the Kerman State Bank’s business and operations, including but not limited to, the scope of its business, its investments, its reserves against deposits, the nature and amount of any collateral for loans, the timing of availability of deposited funds, the issuance of securities, the payment of dividends, bank expansion and bank activities, including real estate development and insurance activities, and the maximum rates of interest allowed on certain deposits. Kerman State Bank is also subject to the requirements and restrictions of various consumer laws and regulations.

     Most of the laws and regulations described above under “Information about Westamerica — Regulation and supervision of banks,” “— Capital standards,” “Prompt corrective action and other enforcement mechanisms,” “— Safety and soundness standards,” “— Restrictions on dividends and other distributions,” “— Premiums for deposit insurance and assessments for examinations,” “— CRA and fair lending developments,” “— Financial privacy legislation,” “— Recently enacted legislation and regulations,” and “— Pending legislation and regulations” apply equally to Kerman State Bank.

The following section summarize the application of certain statutory and regulatory provisions and proposals to Kerman State Bank and is not intended to be a complete description of these provisions and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions discussed.

Capital adequacy requirements

     Kerman State Bank is subject to the FDIC’s regulations governing capital adequacy for nonmember banks. Additional capital requirements may be imposed on banks based on market risk.

44


Set forth below are the Kerman State Bank’s risk based and leverage capital ratios as of December 31, 2001:

                         
To Be Well
Capitalized
For CapitalUnder Prompt
AdequacyCorrective Action
ActualPurposesProvisions



AmountRatioAmountRatioAmountRatio






(Dollars in 000s)
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) $12,524   16.39% $6,115   8.0% $7,643   10.0%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)  11,564   15.13%  3,057   4.0%  4,586   6.0%
Leverage (to average assets)  11,564   11.24%  4,114   4.0%  5,143   5.0%

On October 25, 2001, Kerman State Bank entered into an agreement with the FDIC and the DFI. The board of directors agreed to reduce the level of classified and non-accrual loans, develop and implement a plan with specific strategies to diversify the loan portfolio and reduce concentration of credit, revise the bank’s lending and collection policies and review the allowance for loan loss for adequacy each quarter. The FDIC and DFI also required the bank to maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least nine percent and not pay a dividend without prior consent of the FDIC and DFI. Management believes that they have complied with the provisions of the agreement. The FDIC and DFI terminated the agreement on March 14, 2002.

Activities of subsidiaries of state non-member banks

     In January 2001, the FDIC adopted final regulations implementing Section 121 of Title I, regarding permissible activities and investments of insured state banks. The regulations, in the form of amendments to Part 362 of the FDIC rules and regulations, provide the framework for subsidiaries of state nonmember banks to engage in financial activities that the GLBA permits national banks to conduct through a financial subsidiary. The regulations require that prior to commencing such financial activities, a state nonmember bank must notify the FDIC of its intent to do so, and must certify that it is well-managed and that it and all of its subsidiary insured depository institutions are well-capitalized after deducting its investment in the new subsidiary. Furthermore, the regulations require that the notifying bank must, and must continue to, (i) disclose the capital deduction in published financial statements, and (ii) comply with sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and (iii) comply with all required financial and operational safeguards.

     Activities permissible for financial subsidiaries of national banks, and pursuant to Section 362 of the FDIC rules and regulations are permissible for financial subsidiaries of state nonmember banks, include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) Lending, exchanging, transferring, investing for others, or safeguarding money or securities; (b) Insuring, guaranteeing, or indemnifying against loss, harm, damage, illness, disability, or death, or providing and issuing annuities, and acting as principal, agent, or broker for purposes of the foregoing, in any State; (c) Providing financial, investment, or economic advisory services, including advising an investment company; (d) Issuing or selling instruments representing interests in pools of assets permissible for a bank to hold directly; and, (e) Underwriting, dealing in, or making a market in securities.

Additionally, the FDIC, pursuant to authority granted under Section 24 of the FDI Act, has the authority to approve applications from state nonmember banks to engage in activities that are prohibited to national banks and their financial subsidiaries.

Privacy

     As required under Title V of the GLBA, federal banking regulators issued final rules on May 10, 2000 to implement the privacy provisions of Title V. Pursuant to the rules, financial institutions must provide (i) initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates; (ii) annual notices of their privacy policies to current customers; and (iii) a reasonable method for customers to “opt out” of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties.

45


Compliance with the rules was optional until July 1, 2001. As of July 1, 2001 Kerman State Bank was in compliance with the privacy provisions of the GLBA and the implementing regulations promulgated by the FDIC.

Safeguarding confidential customer information

In compliance with federal guidelines under GLBA, Kerman State Bank implemented a security program appropriate to its size and complexity and the nature and scope of its operations in advance of the July 1, 2001 effective date.

CRA sunshine requirements

     In February 2001, the federal banking agencies adopted final regulations implementing Section 711 of Title 7, the CRA Sunshine Requirements. The regulations require non-governmental entities or persons and insured depository institutions and affiliates that are parties to written agreements made in connection with the fulfillment of the institution’s CRA obligations to make available to the public and the federal banking agencies a copy of each such agreement. The regulations impose annual reporting requirements concerning the disbursement, receipt and use of funds or other resources under each such agreement. The effective date of the regulations was April 1, 2001.

     Kerman State Bank is not a party to any agreement that would be subject of reporting pursuant to the CRA Sunshine Requirements.

Kerman State Bank intends to comply with all provisions of the GLBA and all implementing regulations as they become effective.

USA Patriot Act

     As part of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (“USA Patriot Act”), signed into law on October 26, 2001, Congress adopted the International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (“IMLAFATA”). IMLAFATA authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other government agencies, to adopt special measures applicable to banks, bank holding companies, or other financial institutions. These measures may include enhanced record keeping and reporting requirements for certain financial transactions that are of primary money laundering concern, due diligence requirements concerning the beneficial ownership of certain types of accounts, and restrictions or prohibitions on certain types of accounts with foreign financial institutions. Covered financial institutions also are barred from dealing with foreign “shell” banks. In addition, IMLAFATA expands the circumstances under which funds in a bank account may be forfeited and requires covered financial institutions to respond under certain circumstances to requests for information from federal banking agencies within 120 hours.

     Treasury regulations implementing the due diligence requirements must be issuedhad no later than April 24, 2002. Whether or not regulations are adopted, the law becomes effective July 23, 2002. Additional regulations are to be adopted during 2002 to implement minimum standards to verify customer identity, to encourage cooperation among financial institutions, federal banking agencies, and law enforcement authorities regarding possible money laundering or terrorist activities, to prohibit the anonymous use of “concentration accounts,” and to require all covered financial institutions to have in place a Bank Secrecy Act compliance program. IMLAFATA also amends the Bank Holding Company Act and the Bank Merger Act to require the federal banking agencies to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s anti-money laundering activities when reviewing an application under these acts.

Kerman State Bank has in place a Bank Secrecy Act compliance program, and it engages in very few transactions of any kind with foreign financial institutions or foreign persons.

Consumer protection laws and regulations

     Bank regulatory agencies are focusing greater attention on compliance with consumer protection laws and their implementing regulations. Examination and enforcement have become more intense in nature, and

46


insured institutions have been advised to monitor carefully compliance with various consumer protection laws and their implementing regulations. Kerman State Bank is subject to many federal consumer protection statutes and regulations, including the CRA, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Penalties under these laws may include fines, reimbursements and other penalties. Due to heightened regulatory concern related to compliance with these and other statutes generally, Kerman State Bank may incur additional compliance costs or be required to expend additional funds for investments in its local community.

Other legislation

Other legislation has been or may be proposed to the United States Congress and the California Legislature and regulations which may be proposed by the FDIC, the DFI and the Federal Reserve may affect the business of the Bank. It cannot be predicted whether any pending or proposed legislation or regulations will be adopted or the effect such legislation or regulations may have upon the business of the Bank.

Other information

     Kerman State Bank holds no material patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises or concessions. No expenditures have been made by the Bank, during the last two fiscal years, on material research activities relating to the development of services or the improvement of existing services.

     Based upon present business activities, compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating discharge of materials into the environment will have no material effects upon the capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position of the Bank.

     Kerman State Bank employed 47 full-time employees and six part-time employees as of December 31, 2001.

Kerman State Bank’s business is related to the agricultural seasons and cycles. Kerman State Bank intends to continue with the same basic commercial banking activities that have characterized Kerman State Bank’s operations since its inception.

Premises

     Kerman State Bank maintains a headquarters banking office located at 306 South Madera Avenue, Kerman, California and branches located at 5751 South Elm Street, Easton California and 1312 P Street, Firebaugh, California. An administrative office is located at 426 South Madera Avenue in Kerman, California.

     The Kerman State Bank’s main office is owned and consists of a two-story facility. This is a full service office providing products and services for deposit customers with walk-up, drive-up and ATM services. Safe deposit boxes are available for rent. It also houses loan officers who attend to the customer’s loan related needs.

     The administrative building provides an area for employees who perform non-customer contact functions and services. This includes internal accounting and auditing functions.

     The Easton office is leased on a month to month basis. It is a full service facility including deposits, loans and ATM services.

The Firebaugh office building is owned, but the land is leased. This is also a full service office, accommodating deposits, loans and has an ATM for automated transactions.

Legal Proceedings

     In the normal course of business, Kerman State Bank is occasionally made a party to actions seeking to recover damages from the Bank. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on Kerman State Bank’s financial condition.

47


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF KERMAN STATE BANK

     Certain matters discussed or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forwarded-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to; those described in “Information about Kerman State Bank.” Therefore, the information set forth therein should be carefully considered when evaluating the business prospects of Kerman State Bank.

     Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is designed to provide a better understanding of significant trends relating to Kerman State Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources as reflected in the financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This analysis and the accompanying selected statistical information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in this Proxy Statement/ Prospectus.

RESULT OF OPERATIONS

Summary

     For the year ended December 31, 2001, Kerman State Bank reported net income of $981,000 or $0.69 per share (basic and diluted) as compared to $989,000 or $.68 per share (basic and diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2000. Kerman State Bank’s net interest income was $4,805,000 for 2001 as compared to $5,144,000 in 2000. However, the decrease in net interest income was offset by a decrease in the provision for loan losses of $295,000. Other income and expense increased $64,000 and $37,000 or 6.9% and 0.9%, respectively.

     Total assets at December 31, 2001 were $105.3 million, representing a 7.5% decrease over total assets of $113.8 million at December 31, 2000. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in the net loan portfolio of $12.7 million and a decrease in securities of $4.4 million, which were offset by an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $8.3 million. The delay in setting a price for the 2000 raisin crop prevented the annual raisin production loans from being paid off, resulting in a greater than normal portfolio balance at the year ended 2000.

     Totalbrokered deposits at December 31, 2001 were $92.9 million representing an 8.6% decrease in overall deposits from $101.6 million at December 31, 2000. The net decrease in interest bearing deposits of $6.4 was primarily due to the raisin industry not settling on a price at the end of 2000. This event reduced the usual amount of annual deposits from crop proceeds. Likewise, without payments for the delivered raisins, borrowers withdrew funds to use for cultural costs associated with the upcoming production year.

     Kerman State Bank’s primary capital resource is shareholders’ equity, which increased $841,000 in 2001 which is a result of net income of $981,000, unrealized gain on securities of $104,000 less the repurchase of 33,411 shares for $244,000.

     For the year ended December 31, 2000, Kerman State Bank reported net income of $989,000 or $0.68 per share (basic and diluted). Net income increased $70,000 in 2000, representing an increase 7.6% from the net income of $919,000 in 1999. Total assets at December 31, 2000 were $113.8 million, representing a 7.0% increase over total assets of $106.3 million at December 31, 1999. This increase was primarily due to an increase in net loans of $11.2 million.

     Total deposits at December 31, 2000 were $101.6 million representing a 6.1% increase in overall deposits of $95.7 million at December 31, 1999.

Net interest income

     Interest income represents interest earned by Kerman State Bank on its portfolio of loans and investment securities. Interest expense represents interest paid to Kerman State Bank depositors, and on borrowings from

48


the Federal Home Loan Bank, as well as the temporary borrowings of Fed Funds on an occasional overnight basis. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and fees derived from loans and other earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. The volume of loans and deposits and interest-rate fluctuations resulting from various economic conditions may significantly affect net interest income.

     Net interest income of $4.8 million in 2001 decreased by 6.6% from net interest income of $5.1 million in 2000. The prime rate at the beginning of 2001 was 9.5% and after eleven rate cuts during the year the prime rate at December 31, 2001 was 4.75%. Total interest income and total interest expense in 2001 decreased $2.1 million and $1.7 million or 22% and 39%, respectively. The primary cause for the decrease was the reduction in the prime rate as discussed earlier and the absence of 2001 borrowings from the FHLB for peak season loan demand.

     Net interest income in 2000 increased by 11.4% from net interest income of $4.6 million in 1999 to $5.1 million in 2000, primarily due to the late settlement of a final raisin price for the 2000-year crop and an increase in the prime rate during 2000. Interest expense in 2000 increased $1.3 million. This increase was due to increased customer deposits and borrowings from the FHLB to supplement the peak season agricultural loan demand.

49


Distribution of average assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity:

interest rates and interest differential

The following table sets forth average daily balances of assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity during 2001 and 2000 along with total interest income earned and expense paid, and the average yields earned or rates paid thereon and the net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.

                                      
December 31, 2001December 31, 2000December 31, 1999



AverageIncome/AverageAverageIncome/AverageAverageIncome/Average
BalanceExpenseYield/RateBalanceExpenseYield/RateBalanceExpenseYield/Rate









Loans(1)(2) $68,844  $6,115   8.88% $70,610  $7,500   10.62% $63,698  $6,175   9.69%
Investment securities:                                    
 Taxable  15,748   956   6.07%  22,402   1,489   6.65%  18,703   1,084   5.80%
 Non-taxable(3)  1,421   72   5.07%  1,666   80   4.80%  1,856   106   5.71%
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total loans and investment securities  86,013   7,143   8.30%  94,678   9,069   9.58%  84,257   7,365   8.74%
Due from banks, time  134   8   5.97%  194   12   6.19%  294   17   5.78%
Federal funds sold  8,634   344   3.98%  8,019   492   6.14%  8,634   360   4.17%
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total earning assets $94,781  $7,495   7.91% $102,891  $9,573   9.30% $93,185  $7,742   8.31%
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Cash and due from banks  6,230           6,408           6,244         
Allowance for loan losses  (1,351)          (1,197)          (1,310)        
Premises and equipment, net  840           860           2,453         
Accrued interest receivable and other assets  5,350           5,440           2,816         
   
           
           
         
Total assets $105,850          $114,402          $103,388         
   
           
           
         
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity                                    
Deposits:                                    
 Interest bearing demand $13,562  $213   1.57% $14,756  $261   1.77% $15,609  $268   1.72%
 Savings  5,041   90   1.79%  5,303   111   2.09%  4,765   99   2.08%
 Time  59,576   2,387   4.01%  61,793   3,717   6.02%  56,161   2,704   4.81%
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total deposits  78,179   2,690   3.44%  81,852   4,089   5.00%  76,535   3,071   4.01%
Borrowings              4,986   340   6.82%  968   56   5.79%
Total interest bearing liabilities $78,179  $2,690   3.44% $86,838  $4,429   5.10% $77,503  $3,127   4.03%
Noninterest bearing DDA  15,561           16,171           15,836         
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities  1,046           550           489         
Shareholders’ equity  11,064           10,843           9,560         
   
           
           
         
Total liabilities and Shareholders’ equity $105,850          $114,402          $103,388         
   
           
           
         
Net interest income     $4,805          $5,144          $4,615     
       
           
           
     
Net interest income to Average earning assets (Net Interest Margin(4))      5.07%          5.00%              4.95%
       
           
               
 


(1) Average loans include nonaccrual loans.
(2) Loan interest income includes loan fee income of $250,000 in 2001 and $204,000 in 2000.

50


(3) Applicable nontaxable securities yields have not been calculated on a tax-equivalent basis because they are not material to Kerman State Bank’s results of operations.
(4) Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by the average balance of total earning assets for the applicable year.

     As shown in Table 1, Kerman State Bank’s net interest margin for 2001 increased to 5.07% at December 31, 2001 from 5.00% at December 31, 2000, an increase of 7 basis points due to an increase of fixed rate loans which were initiated in 1999. This allowed Kerman State Bank to earn a greater return in 2001 as interest expense was lower in 2001 because of the market rate decreases in 2001.

     The net interest margin for 2000 was 5 basis points higher than the net interest margin of 4.95% in 1999. This was the direct result of the raisin industry not settling on a price for the 2000 raisin crop. Since growers did not receive proceeds from their delivered crop, these raisin related financed credits remained opened through year end, thus generating a greater amount of interest income then normal.

Rate and volume analysis

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in interest earned and interest paid in December 31, 2001 over 2000, and December 31, 2000 over 1999. The change resulting from growth in each asset or liability category is expressed as a volume change and changes resulting primarily from changes in rates is expressed as a rate change. The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of absolute dollar amounts of change in each.

                           
2001 Over 20002000 Over 1999


VolumeRateTotalVolumeRateTotal






(Dollars in 000s)
Increase (decrease) In Interest and Fee Income                        
 Time Deposits With Other Financial Institutions $(4) $0  $(4) $(6) $1  $(5)
 Investment securities:                        
  Taxable  (413)  (120)  (533)  229   176   405 
  Non-taxable  (12)  4   (8)  (11)  (15)  (26)
  Federal funds sold  35   (183)  (148)  (27)  159   132 
  Loans  (184)  (1,201)  (1,385)  685   640   1,325 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total interest and fee income  (578)  (1,500)  (2,078)  870   961   1,831 
Increase (Decrease) In Interest Expense                        
 Deposits:                        
  Interest bearing transaction accounts  (20)  (28)  (48)  (14)  7   (7)
  Savings  (5)  (16)  (21)  12      12 
  Time deposits  (129)  (1,201)  (1,330)  356   657   1,013 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Total deposits  (154)  (1,245)  (1,399)  354   664   1,018 
 Borrowings  (170)  (170)  (340)  233   51   284 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Total interest expense  (324)  (1,415)  (1,739)  587   715   1,302 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Net interest income $(254) $(85) $(339) $283  $246  $529 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

     During 2001, total interest income decreased $2.1 million or 21% as compared to 2000. Of this decrease, $1.5 million or 72% was related to the drop in interest rates and $578,000 or 28% was related to a decrease in interest earning assets.

     During 2001, total interest expense decreased $1.7 million or 39% as compared to 2000. Of this decrease, $1.4 million or 81% was related to the drop in interest rates and $324,000 or 19% was related to a decline in customer deposits and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

51


     During 2000, total interest income increased $1.8 million or 23% as compared to 1999. Of this increase, $870,000 or 48% was related to the increase in volume of average earning assets in 2000 as compared to 1999 and $961,000 or 52% was related to interest rates.

     During 2000, total interest expense increased $1.3 million or 42% from 1999. Of this increase, $587,000 or 45% was related to the volume of average interest-bearing deposits and borrowings in 2000 compared to 1999 and $715,000 or 55% was related to interest rates.

Non-interest income

     Non-interest income consists primarily of service charges and other fees earned on services provided to Kerman State Bank’s customers. Total non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $998,000, an increase of $64,000 and 7% compared to the same period in 2000. The increase was primarily the result of increased fees collected from customers for services charges and NSF charges, which totaled $752,000 in 2001. This represents an increase of $87,000 and 13% greater from 2000.

     Non-interest income was $934,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000, which was $74,000 or 9% greater than the same period in 1999. The increase was primarily the result of increased fees collected from service charges and NSF charges of $665,000 in 1999. This represents an increase of $81,000 or 14% from 1999.

Non-interest expense

     Non-interest expense was $4,005,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001, which was $37,000 or 0.9% greater than the same period in 2000. The increase was primarily due to salaries and wages increasing $226,000 or 15.8% in 2001. Personnel were added to accommodate increased supervision and restructuring of the loan production process and related functions along with the payment of a $60,000 bonus to loan department employees for meeting specific year-end loan goals. The increase in salaries and wages was offset by a decrease in other real estate expenses of $262,000 or 44% in 2001 compared to 2000. Other operating expenses were up $133,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001 or 20% primarily due to an increase of $30,000 in legal and professional fees associated with merger activities, $31,000 for stationery and supplies and $75,000 for other miscellaneous expenses. The increase in miscellaneous expenses was due to a $45,000 settlement for a life insurance policy on the former CEO, an increase in FRB service charges and fuel surcharge increase for armored car services.

     Non-interest expense for 2000 was $3,968,000 which was $409,000 or 11% greater than the same period in 1999. Of this amount, $386,000 was the result of a write-down of foreclosed assets to estimated fair value. These assets were purchased to protect Kerman State Bank’s security interest on a nonperforming loan.

Investment portfolio

     The following tables show the book value of investment securities as of December 31, 2001, 2000, and December 31, 1999, and a summary of the maturities and weighted average yields of investment securities as of December 31, 2001.

Carrying Value as of December 31:

              
Available-for-Sale

200120001999



(In 000s)
Securities of the U. S. Treasury and government agencies $15,400  $19,680  $22,182 
Municipal securities  1,425   1,520   1,719 
   
   
   
 
 Total $16,825  $21,200  $23,901 
   
   
   
 

52


Maturity and Weighted Average Yield of Investment Securities

as of December 31, 2001
                                         
After OneAfter Five
In One YearthroughthroughAfter
or LessFive YearsTen YearsTen YearsTotal





AmountYieldAmountYieldAmountYieldAmountYieldAmountYield










(Dollars in 000s)
Available for sale securities:                                        
Securities of the US Treasury and other US government agencies $2,521   7.08%  $1,000   7.25%         $11,879   5.97%  $15,400   6.03% 
Municipal securities(1)  254   6.49%   529   5.80% $642   7.10%           1,425   6.46% 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total $2,775   7.03%  $1,529   6.75% $642   7.10%  $11,879   5.97%  $16,825   6.20% 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 


(1) Yields shown are not computed on a tax equivalent basis.

     Investment securities decreased $4.4 million or 20% at December 31, 2001 compared to December 31, 2000. The decrease was the result of issuers exercising their rights to call these securities due to the decrease in market interest rates.

     Investment securities decreased $2.7 million or 11% at December 31, 2000 compared to December 31, 1999. The decrease was due to Kerman State Bank using the proceeds from sales and maturities during the year to help fund loan growth and demand.

Loan portfolio

The composition of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 is summarized in the table below.

         
20012000


(In 000s)
Agricultural loans $28,537  $34,317 
Commercial loans  12,556   12,436 
Real estate loans mortgage loans  21,275   27,388 
Installment loans  1,853   2,783 
LESS:        
Deferred loan fees and costs  7   18 
Allowance for loan losses  1,298   1,260 
   
   
 
Total $62,916  $75,646 
   
   
 

Agricultural loans

     Agricultural loans are extensions of credit to provide operating funds, injections of capital, purchases of equipment or other purposes relating to the production and harvest of farm crops, livestock, dairy and/or other agricultural related needs. The collateral held by Kerman State Bank for these loans is generally crops, equipment and real estate. These credits generally mature within one year.

Commercial loans

     Commercial loans are credits made for funding a business need of a retail, wholesale, service, professional, manufacturing, municipality or other government agency or business. The funds are generally used for operating expenses, purchasing inventory, and carrying accounts receivable and working capital.

53


Real estate mortgage loans

     Real estate loans are those loans made to provide funding for land purchases and development, construction or purchase of residential, business, industrial or other real property. The collateral held by Kerman State Bank for these types of loans is generally the related real estate. The typical terms of these loans are to either to fully amortize within fifteen to thirty years or payments due over five years with a balloon at balloon at maturity. Construction loans are usually extended for a period of six months.

Installment loans

     Installment loans are consumer credits made for the various needs of the individual consumer. They may include the purchase of personal transportation or recreational vehicles, personal lines of credit, home equity loans or lines and unsecured loans for personal purposes. These loans generally mature within one year to five years. The collateral taken by Kerman State Bank is usually the purchase being financed.

Loan maturities and sensitivity to changes in interest rates

The following table shows maturity distribution of loans and sensitivity in interest rates as of December 31, 2001.

                  
After
In One YearOne throughAfter
or LessFive YearsFive YearsTotal




(In 000s)
Agricultural loans $22,270  $6,145  $122  $28,537 
Commercial loans  7,336   4,472   748   12,556 
Real estate loans mortgage loans  5,066   15,223   986   21,275 
Installment loans  539   968   346   1,853 
   
   
   
   
 
 Total $35,211  $26,808  $2,202  $64,221 
   
   
   
   
 
Loans with fixed interest rates $4,892  $14,445  $542  $19,879 
Loans with floating interest rates  30,319   12,363   1,660  $44,342 
   
   
   
   
 
 Total $35,211  $26,808  $2,202  $64,221 
   
   
   
   
 

Provision for loan losses

     The provision for loan losses corresponds to the level of the allowance for loan losses that management deems adequate to provide for probable losses in the portfolio. The balance in the allowance for loan loss reflects the amount which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to provide for these probable losses after weighting the mix of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, past loan experience and such other factors as deserve recognition in estimating loan losses.

     Management allocated $295,000 as a provision for loan losses in 2001 compared to $590,000 in 2000. The reduction of $295,000 in the provision from 2001 and 2000 was primarily the result of the changes in the level of charged off loans, which totaled $312,000 in 2001 compared to $746,000 in 2000. Although the level of classified assets at the beginning of 2001 increased, measures were taken to cure a majority of the classified items before year-end.

     Kerman State Bank establishes the total amount of its allowance for loan losses by considering a variety of factors. Management establishes a risk rating for each loan based upon an analysis of customary underwriting criteria. An allowance is allocated on a percentage basis for the total loan volume for each risk-rating category. For individual loans that are considered as substandard quality, a through analysis is performed on each identified loan and a specific loan loss allocation is assigned primarily based on an estimate of the fair market valuation of collateral held as security for loan repayment.

54


2003. In addition to the above factors, Kerman Statedeposits, National Bank considers and allocates reserves based on any portfolio lending concentrations, trends in delinquency, local and regional economic factors, interest rate environment and certain special considerations that may currently exist. This process is completed at least quarterly. After calculating the total amount of allocation necessary, additions to Kerman State Bank’s allowance for loan loss are funded if required.

Kerman State Bank does not allocate its allowance for loan losses among loan categories.

Summary of loan loss experience

     As a natural corollary to Kerman State Bank’s lending activities, some loan losses are experienced. The risk of loss varies with the type of loan being made and the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan. To some extent, the degree of perceived risk is taken into accountRedwoods may obtain other borrowed funds through its membership in establishing the structure of, and interest rates and security for, specific loans and for various types of loans. Kerman State Bank attempts to minimize its credit risk exposure by use of thorough loan application and approval procedures.

     Kerman State Bank maintains a program to systematically review its existing loan portfolio. Loans are graded based on their overall quality. Those loans which management determines require further monitoring and supervision are segregated and reviewed on a periodic basis. Loans for which it is probable that all amounts due (including principal and interest) will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered to be impaired. In addition, when principal or interest on a loan is past due 90 days or more, such loan is placed on non-accrual status unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. Loans that are placed on non-accrual status are considered impaired. The recorded investment in impaired loans totaled $2.6 million at December 31, 2001 and $2.9 million at December 31, 2000. If these loans had been performing as agreed, interest income of $287,000 and $365,000 would have been recognized for 2001 and 2000, respectively.

     Kerman State Bank charges off that portion of any loan which management or bank examiners consider representing a loss. A loan is generally considered by management to represent a loss in whole or in part when an exposure beyond any collateral value is apparent, servicing of the unsecured portion has been discontinued or collection is not anticipated based on the borrower’s financial condition and general economic conditions in the borrower’s industry. The principal amount of any loan classified as a loss is charged against Kerman State Bank’s allowance for loan losses.

55


The following table provides a summary of Kerman State Bank’s loan loss experience as of December 31, 2001, and 2000.

          
December 31,

20012000


(Dollars in 000s)
Average loans for the period $68,844  $70,610 
   
   
 
Loans outstanding at end of period  64,221   76,924 
   
   
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
        
Balance, beginning of period  1,260   1,415 
Less loans charged off:        
 Real estate loans  212   342 
 Commercial loans  27   362 
 Installment loans  73   42 
Total loans charged off  312   746 
Recoveries:        
 Real estate loans  0   0 
 Commercial loans  20   0 
 Installment loans  35   1 
Total recoveries  55   1 
Net loans charged off  257   745 
Provision for loan losses  295   590 
   
   
 
Balance, end of period $1,298  $1,260 
   
   
 
Net loans charged off to average loans by types:        
 Real estate loans  .89%  1.32%
 Commercial loans  .02%  .86%
 Installment loans  1.68%  1.41%
Net losses to average loans outstanding  .37%  1.06%

Nonperforming assets

The following table sets forth the amount of Kerman State Bank’s nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated:

          
December 31,

20012000


(Dollars in 000s)
Nonaccrual loans $2,577  $2,931 
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more  0   0 
Restructured loans  0   0 
   
   
 
 Total nonperforming loans $2,577  $2,931 
Real estate owned  2,492   0 
   
   
 
 Total nonperforming assets  5,069   2,931 
   
   
 

     Loans are placed in a non-accrual status and any accrued but unpaid interest income is reversed and charged against income when the payment of interest or principal is ninety (90) days or more past due; or in the opinion of management the collectability of any portion of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Non-accrual loans at both December 31, 2001 and 2000 constituted approximately 4% of total gross loans.

56


Loans are placed on non-accrual regardless of the fact Kerman State Bank may ultimately recover all or a portion of the principal and interest due. The classification of a loan as a non-accrual is not necessarily indicative of a potential charge-off. Management of Kerman State Bank believe its procedures for administering and reviewing its loan portfolio are effective in identifying loans where significant problems exist. At December 31, 2001, and 2000 there were no restructured loans. Management believes all loans as of December 31, 2001 are collectable.

     Loans for which accrual of interest has been discontinued amounted to $2.6 million at December 31, 2001 and are included in loan totals on the balance sheet. If interest on these loans had been accrued such income would have approximated $287,000. Any payments on these loans will be applied to principal until the loan is removed from non-accrual status. At December 31, 2001, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were classified as non-accrual.

     Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are to be sold and are initially recorded at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value at the date of foreclosure. After foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations. Any subsequent revisions in estimated fair value less costs to sell are reported as adjustments to the carrying amount of the real estate provided the adjusted carrying amount does not exceed the original carrying amount at the date of foreclosure. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other operating expenses.

     At December 31, 2001 Kerman State Bank held approximately $2.6 million in foreclosed real estate. During the year, Kerman State Bank foreclosed on properties held as collateral for agricultural related loans. The weakening economy and the depressed raisin industry impaired the borrowers’ abilities to service these loans. Kerman State Bank incurred approximately $330,000 in expenses related to these properties during 2001.

     On October 25, 2001, Kerman State Bank entered into an agreement with the FDIC and the DFI. The Board of Directors agreed to reduce the level of classified and non-accrual loans, develop and implement a plan with specific strategies to diversify the loan portfolio and reduce a concentration of credits within the raisin industry, revise Kerman State Bank’s lending and collection policies and review the allowance for loan loss reserve for adequacy each calendar quarter. The FDIC and DFI also required Kerman State Bank to maintain a Tier 1 Leverage Capital ratio of at least nine percent and restricted any dividend payment without prior consent of the FDIC and DFI.

     On March 14, 2002, Kerman State Bank was notified by the FDIC that based on Kerman State Bank’s substantive compliance with each item in the agreement and the overall improved financial condition and operating results of Kerman State Bank, the agreement was terminated and no longer in effect.

Deposits

The following table sets forth the maturity of time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2001 and 2000.

                  
2001

2000

)
(Dollars in 000s
3 Months or Less $16,898   44% $23,112   52%
Over 3 through 6 Months  19,132   50%  20,684   47%
Over 6 Months through 12 Months  1,619   4%  638   1%
Over 12 Months  612   2%  0   0%
   
   
   
   
 
 Total $38,261   100% $44,434   100%
   
   
   
   
 

57


Borrowings

The following table sets forth the annual average borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco during the respective periods.

           
200120001999



(Dollars in 000)
 $0  $4,986  $986 

     There were no short-term borrowings outstandingand its retention of treasury, tax and loan funds at either December 31, 2001 or 2000. Short-term borrowings consist primarily of federal funds purchased and borrowings from the Federal Home LoanReserve Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”). Kerman State Bank maintains a collateralized lineFrancisco.

     As of December 31, 2003, Redwood Empire Bancorp provided VISA, Mastercard, American Express and Discover credit card processing and settlement services for approximately 35,000 merchants located throughout the United States. In 2003, its processing volume exceeded $1.8 billion. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s merchant card services customer base is made up of merchants located in its primary market area and merchants who have been acquired by Redwood Empire Bancorp through the use of independent sales agents and independent sales organizations.

     Redwood Empire Bancorp is regulated by various government agencies, with the FHLB. Based onprimary regulators being the FHLB stock requirementsFRB, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

     Redwood Empire Bancorp and its subsidiaries had 159 full-time-equivalent employees at December 31, 2001,2003. Redwood’s headquarters are located at 111 Santa Rosa Avenue, Santa Rosa, California 95404-4905, and its telephone number is (707) 573-4800.

     Additional information about Redwood Empire Bancorp and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this line provided for maximum borrowings of approximately $7,843,000. Kerman State Bank also has available unused lines of credit totaling $1,000,000 for Federal funds transactions at December 31, 2001.document. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” on page 78.

Return on equity and assets

The following sets forth key ratios for the years ending December 31, 2001, and 2000.

         
20012000


Net income as a percentage of average assets  .93%  .86%
Net income as a percentage of average equity  8.87%  9.12%
Average equity as a percentage of average assets  10.45%  9.48%
Dividends declared per share as a percentage of net income per share  0%  29.52%

Liquidity management

     Management has established, and the board of directors has approved policies and guidelines for investments and liquidity of Kerman State Bank. These policies include an investment policy, an interest rate risk policy and an asset/liability policy. The goals of these policies are to provide liquidity to meet the financial requirements of Kerman State Bank’s customers, maintain adequate reserves as required by regulatory agencies and maximize earnings of Kerman State Bank.

     Kerman State Bank continued to manage its cash position in a way, which avoids reliance on short-term borrowings or brokered deposits. Concentrations of deposits from any one source are also avoided. The liquidity ratio of net loans to total deposits was 67.74% at December 31, 2001 and 74.47% at December 31, 2000. At December 31, 2001, 31.51% of total assets were represented by liquid assets, i.e., cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, money market funds and investment securities not pledged to secure public deposits, compared to 25.66% in 2000.

     Management regularly reviews general economic and financial conditions, both external and internal, and determines whether the positions taken with respect to liquidity and interest rate sensitivity continue to be appropriate. Kerman State Bank also utilizes a monthly “Gap” report that identifies rate sensitivity over the short-and long-term.

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk

     Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. Kerman State Bank’s market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its loan and deposit functions and management actively monitors and manages this interest rate risk exposure. Kerman State Bank does not have any market risk sensitive instruments entered into for trading purposes. Management uses several different tools to monitor its interest rate risk. One measure of exposure to interest rate risk is gap analysis. A positive gap for a given period means that the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or otherwise repricing within such period is greater than the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or otherwise repricing within the same period. Kerman State Bank has a negative gap for time periods from three months up to one year. In addition, Kerman State Bank uses interest rate shock simulations to estimate the effect of certain hypothetical

58


rate changes. Based upon Kerman State Bank’s shock simulations, net interest income is expected to marginally decline with increasing rates and increase with declining rates.

     Kerman State Bank’s overall cumulative positive gap is the result of the majority of loans held in the portfolio having longer maturity dates. On the liability side, the majority of the Kerman State Bank’s time deposits have average terms of approximately four months while savings accounts and other interest-bearing transaction accounts are recorded for gap analysis in the within three months category because they do not have a contractual maturity date.

     Taking into consideration that savings accounts and other interest-bearing transaction accounts typically do not react immediately to changes in interest rates, management has taken the following steps to manage its negative gap position. Kerman State Bank has reduced interest rates on time deposits and focused on increasing noninterest-bearing deposits and floating rate loans. In addition, Kerman State Bank holds approximately one-half of its investments in the available-for-sale category in order to maintain flexibility in matching its investments with repricing changes which occur in its liabilities.

     The following table sets forth the distribution of repricing opportunities of Kerman State Bank’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the interest rate sensitivity gap (i.e. interest rate sensitive assets less interest rate sensitive liabilities), the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap and the cumulative gap as a percentage of total interest-earning assets as of December 31, 2001. The table also sets forth the time periods during which interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities will mature or may reprice in accordance with their contractual terms. The interest rate relationships between the repriceable assets and repriceable liabilities are not necessarily constant. The table should, therefore, be used only as a guide as to the possible effect changes in interest rates might have on the net margins of Kerman State Bank.

     The following table sets forth the distribution of repricing opportunities, based on contractual terms, of the Company’s earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at December 31, 2001, the interest rate sensitivity gap (i.e. interest rate sensitive assets less interest rate sensitive liabilities), the cumulative interest rate

59


sensitivity gap, the interest rate sensitivity gap ratio (i.e. interest rate gap divided by interest rate sensitive assets) and the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio.

Distribution of Repricing Opportunities

                           
December 31, 2001

AfterAfter One
After 36 MonthsYear but
Within 3but Withinbut WithinWithinAfter Five
Months6 MonthsOne YearFive YearsYearsTotal






(Dollars in 000s)
Federal funds sold $12,105  $   $   $   $   $12,105 
Interest bearing deposits in other banks              99       99 
Agency securities  2,106   221   441   11,328   2,729   16,825 
Loans  40,332   6,384   708   15,492       62,916 
   
   
   
   
       
 
  Total earning assets  54,543   6,605   1,149   26,919   2,729   91,945 
Interest checking, money market and savings  21,446                   21,446 
Certificates of deposit:                        
 Less than $100,000  7,719   4,694   1,717   98       14,228 
 More than $100,000  19,128   19,133               38,261 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  Total interest-bearing liabilities  48,293   23,827   1,717   98       73,935 
Interest rate gap  (6,250)  (17,222)  (568)  26,821   2,729   18,010 
Cumulative interest rate gap  (6,250)  (10,972)  (11,540)  15,281   18,010     
Interest rate gap ratio  (5.90)%  (16.27)%  (.54)%  25.34%  2.58%    
Cumulative interest rate gap ratio  (5.90)%  (10.37)%  (10.90)%  14.44%  17.01%    

     Based on the contractual terms of its assets and liabilities, Kerman State Bank is currently liability sensitive in terms of its short-term exposure to interest rates. In other words, Kerman State Bank’s liabilities reprice faster than its assets.

Capital resources

     The current and projected capital position of Kerman State Bank and the impact of capital plans and long term strategies are reviewed regularly by management. Kerman State Bank’s capital position represents the level of capital available to support continued operations and expansions.

     Kerman State Bank’s board of directors obtained regulatory approval to buy back a maximum of 50,000 shares of its common stock at its market price not to exceed $7.33 per share. During 2001 Kerman State Bank purchased 33,411 shares of common stock at a range of $7.25 to $7.33 a share for a total of $244,355.

     Kerman State Bank’s primary capital resource is shareholders’ equity, which increased $841,000 in 2001 and is a result of net income of $981,000, unrealized gain on securities of $104,000 less the repurchase of 33,411 shares for $244,000.

     Kerman State Bank’s regulatory capital ratios as of December 31, 2001 are shown above in the section entitled “Information about Kerman State Bank-Capital adequacy requirements.”

6064


MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

Market quotationsQuotations

     Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “WABC.” Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock is thinly traded in the over-the-counter market on the OTC Bulletin BoardNasdaq National Market under the symbol “KMSC.OB.“REBC.” The following table lists for Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock the high and low closing sale prices, as reported on Nasdaq, and for Kerman State Bank the actual trades as reported to Kerman State Bank by brokers handling trades in its common stock.Nasdaq. The quotations shown have been adjusted to reflect stock dividends and represent inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and, to the extent they represent bid prices, may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

                      
WestamericaKerman State BankWestamericaRedwood Empire
Common StockCommon StockBancorporationBancorp


Common StockCommon Stock
HighLowHighLow





HighLowHighLow
2000
 




2002
 
First Quarter $27.75 $21.00 $10.25 $9.25  $41.09 $35.25 $19.20 $16.33 
Second Quarter 30.06 24.38 10.25 9.38  43.43 37.26 21.30 18.03 
Third Quarter 33.56 27.00 9.00 7.75  40.68 35.20 18.41 16.80 
Fourth Quarter 43.75 30.69 6.75 6.38  41.69 34.24 19.47 17.22 
2001
 
2003
 
First Quarter $43.00 $33.94 $7.33 $7.25  40.29 37.44 20.50 17.76 
Second Quarter 39.25 35.83 5.90 5.88  43.23 38.36 20.67 18.70 
Third Quarter 41.40 33.94 6.05 5.35  44.67 42.10 24.95 19.33 
Fourth Quarter 40.40 32.77 5.57 5.25  52.41 43.75 26.50 23.50 
2002
 
2004
 
First Quarter $43.50 $37.46 $10.35 $5.55  51.06 47.07 28.25 25.01 
Second Quarter 43.94 41.94 10.55 10.10  52.70 47.05 28.02 22.79 
Third Quarter 55.80 49.04 28.63 23.58 
Fourth Quarter (through October 12) 57.12 55.46 29.00 28.52 

     Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock high and low closing sale prices are restated to reflect a three-for-two stock split announced on July 16, 2003.

     As of December 31, 2001,February 28, 2004, there were approximately 8,900 shareholders of record of Westamerica’sthe Westamerica Bancorporation common stock and 470 holdersstock. As of Kerman State Bank’sDecember 31, 2003 there were approximately 1,099 shareholders of record of Redwood Empire Bancorp’s common stock.

Dividends and dividend policyDividend Policy

     Westamerica Bancorporation has paid cash dividends on its common stock in every quarter since its formation in 1972. Although Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s board of directors will consider the advisability and amount of proposed dividends each quarter, it is currently the intention of the board of directors of Westamerica Bancorporation to continue payment of cash dividends on a quarterly basis. Future dividends will be determined in light of Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s earnings, financial condition, future capital needs, regulatory requirements and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant. There is no assurance, however, that any dividends will be paid because they are dependent upon earnings, financial condition and capital requirements of Westamerica Bancorporation and its subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2001, $158.52003, $174.2 million was available for payment of dividends by Westamerica Bancorporation to its shareholders, under applicable laws and regulations.

     The shareholders of Kerman State Bank’s common stockThere are entitled toregulatory limitations on cash dividends after Kerman Statethat may be paid by Redwood Empire Bancorp as well as regulatory limitations on cash dividends that may be paid by National Bank has complied with all requirements, if any, with respect to the setting aside of sums as a sinking fund or for a redemption account on any class of stock. Then, and not otherwise, the holders of the common stock are entitledRedwoods to receive, subject to the applicable provisions of the California Financial Code, such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors. Each share will participate equally in dividends. Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp which could limit Redwood Empire Bancorp’s ability to pay dividends. Federal regulatory agencies also have the authority to prohibit the payment of dividends by National Bank of the Redwoods if a finding is restricted by law. See “Restrictions on dividends and other distributions.”made that such payment would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice, or if National Bank of the

6165


Redwoods became critically undercapitalized. Redwood Empire Bancorp currently expects that it will continue to pay comparable cash dividends; however, future dividends are subject to approval by Redwood Empire Bancorp’s board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including future earnings, financial condition, regulatory restrictions, cash needs and general business conditions.

     The following table shows the per share cash dividend declared by Westamerica Bancorporation and by Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp during each quarter since January 1, 2000.2002.

         
WestamericaKerman State Bank


2000
        
First Quarter $0.16  $0.00 
Second Quarter  0.16   0.20 
Third Quarter  0.16   0.00 
Fourth Quarter  0.18   0.00 
 
2001
        
First Quarter $0.19  $0.00 
Second Quarter  0.21   0.00 
Third Quarter  0.21   0.00 
Fourth Quarter  0.21   0.00 
 
2002
        
First Quarter $0.22  $0.00 

Shareholdings of management

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to Directors of Kerman State Bank, as well as with respect to all directors, executive, and officers as a group. All of the shares shown in the following table are owned both of record and beneficially except as indicated in the notes to the table. There is no family relationship between any of the directors or principal officers.

                   
Shares Beneficially
Owned as of
PositionsApril, 2002
Held withDirector
Name of ClassAgeKermanSinceNumberPercent






Pete Haupt  85  Director  1982   31,883   2.23%
Jerry Henry  61  Director and Chairman of The Board  1982   5,009   .35%
George “Mickey” Kenneson, Jr.  67  Director  1998   53,746   3.77%
Gene Kezirian  47  Director and Vice Chairman of The Board  1998   20,384   1.43%
John A. Kochergen  80  Director  1982(1)  61,967   4.34%
Sam Sakata  78  Director  1982   27,849   1.95%
Leopold L. Sciacqua  64  Director  1982   40,879   2.86%
George Scott  61  Director  1998(2)  6,462   .45%
John Teixeira  70  Director  1982(3)  1,261   2.19%
C. Robert Wheeler  57  Director and President and CEO  2000(4)  6,000   .04%
All directors and principal officers as a group (14 in numbers)            308,328(5)  21.43%
         
WestamericaRedwood Empire
BancorporationBancorp


2002
        
First quarter $0.22  $0.13 
Second quarter  0.22   0.13 
Third quarter  0.22   0.13 
Fourth quarter  0.24   0.14 
2003
        
First quarter $0.24   0.16 
Second quarter  0.24   0.17 
Third quarter  0.26   0.17 
Fourth quarter  0.26   0.17 
2004
        
First quarter $0.26   0.21 
Second quarter  0.28   0.21 
Third quarter  0.28   0.21 
Fourth Quarter (through October           )      


Redwood Empire Bancorp dividends are restated to reflect a three-for-two stock split announced on July 16, 2003.

(1) Includes beneficial ownership of 61,379 shares held by Kochergen Two Family Limited Partnership and 588 shares held by Kochergen Enterprises Family Limited Partnership.

6266


(2) Includes beneficial ownership of 6,462 shares held in Individual Retirement Account belonging to Mr. Scott.
(3) Includes beneficial ownership of 2,182 shares held by the H&J Chevrolet Inc. Profit Sharing Plan.
(4) Includes beneficial ownership of 1000 shares held in an Individual Retirement Account Belonging to Mr. Wheeler, and 5,000 shares subject to presently exercisable stock options.
(5) Includes beneficial ownership of 11,000 shares subject to presently exercisable stock options

DESCRIPTION OF WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION CAPITAL STOCK

     The authorized capital stock of Westamerica Bancorporation consists of 150,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares of Class B common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2001,2003, there were approximately 34,200,000 shares of common stock outstanding and no shares of either Class B common stock or preferred stock outstanding. In addition, options to acquire an additional 1,600,000 shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock were issued and outstanding.

Common stockStock

     Holders of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, except that, upon giving the notice required by the Westamerica Bancorporation bylaws, shareholders may cumulate their votes for the election of directors. Shareholders are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be legally declared by Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s board of directors. There are legal and regulatory restrictions on the ability of Westamerica Bancorporation to declare and pay dividends. See “Market Price and Dividend Information — Dividends and Dividend Policy.” Westamerica Bancorporation is also subject to certain restrictions on its ability to pay dividends and the amount thereof under the terms a certain debt agreement. See “— Debt Agreement.” In the event of a liquidation, common shareholders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and liquidation preference for securities with a priority over the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock. Attached to each outstanding share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock is a Right which entitles the holder to certain rights as described in the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement. See “Certain Differences in Rights of Shareholders — Shareholder Rights Plan.” Shareholders of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights. Westamerica Bancorporation common stock is not subject to calls or assessments. The transfer agent and registrar for Westamerica Bancorporation common stock is Computershare Investor Services LLC.

Preferred stockStock and Class B common stockCommon Stock

     The Westamerica Bancorporation board of directors is authorized to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the preferred stock and the Class B common stock and may establish series of such stock and determine the variations between series. If and when any preferred stock is issued, the holders of preferred stock may have a preference over holders of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock upon the payment of dividends, upon liquidation of Westamerica Bancorporation, in respect of voting rights and in the redemption of the capital stock of Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation. The Westamerica Bancorporation articles of incorporation provide that except as otherwise provided by law or by the Westamerica Bancorporation board of directors, shares of Class B common stock shall have no voting rights. The issuance of any preferred stock or Class B common stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Westamerica Bancorporation without further action of its shareholders. The issuance of such stock with voting and conversion rights may adversely affect the voting power of the holders of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock. Westamerica Bancorporation has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock or Class B common stock.

Debt agreementAgreement

     Westamerica Bancorporation is a party to a certain debt agreement containing restrictions on the payment of dividends and the amount thereof, as well as financial and other covenants, as described below. In 1996 Westamerica Bancorporation issued and sold $22,500,000 aggregate principal amount of its 7.11% Senior Notes due February 1, 2006, payable semiannually, pursuant to a Senior Note Agreement dated as of February 1, 1996. The Senior Notes

63


require that commencing February 1, 2000 and ending February 1, 2005 Westamerica Bancorporation shall make principal repayments of the lesser of $3,214,286 or the principal amount then outstanding. The Senior Note Agreement contains covenants and other provisions usual and customary for senior indebtedness of this type including, but not limited to, capital debt maintenance ratios, maintenance of specified levels of consolidated tangible net worth, limitations on indebtedness, a fixed charge coverage ratio and restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions. Westamerica Bancorporation is in full compliance with the terms of the Debt Agreement. The Senior Note Agreement does not

67


prohibit Westamerica Bancorporation from executing and delivering the merger agreement or consummating the merger, nor does it currently limit the payment of regular quarterly dividends.

Automatic dividend reinvestment serviceDividend Reinvestment Service and employee stock purchase planEmployee Stock Purchase Plan

     Pursuant to the Westamerica Bancorporation Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Service and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Westamerica Bancorporation provides eligible shareholders and employees of Westamerica Bancorporation and its subsidiaries a method of investing cash dividends and optional cash payments in additional shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock without payment of any brokerage commission or service charge. The Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Service and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan include certain dollar limitations on optimal cash payments.

DESCRIPTION OF KERMAN STATE BANK COMMONREDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP CAPITAL STOCK

General

     Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp currently has an authorized capitalization of 3,200,00010,000,000 shares of common stock and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Of these authorized capital shares, 1,427,507[                    ] shares of common stock are currentlywere issued and outstanding. Anoutstanding and an additional 62,620[                    ] shares of Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s common stock arewere reserved for issuance pursuant to Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s Stock option plan.plan or for exercise of option outside of the option plan [as of                     ].

Common Stock

     The balance of Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s authorized common stock is available to be issued when and as the board of directors of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp determines it advisable to do so. Common shares could be issued for the purpose of raising additional capital, in connection with acquisitions or formation of other businesses, or for other appropriate purposes. The board of directors of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp has the authority to issue common shares to the extent of the present number of authorized unissued shares without obtaining the approval of existing holders of common shares. If additional shares of Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s common stock were to be issued, the existing holders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shares would own a proportionately smaller portion of the total number of issued and outstanding common shares.

Preferred Stock

Redwood Empire Bancorp is authorized to issue 2,000,000 million shares of preferred stock, without par value. The Redwood Empire Bancorp board of directors has the authority to issue Redwood Empire Bancorp preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the dividend rights, dividend rate, liquidation preference, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions), and the number of shares constituting any such series, without any further action by the shareholders unless such action is required by applicable rules or regulations or by the terms of other outstanding series of Redwood Empire Bancorp preferred stock. Subject to the limits and restrictions stated in any resolution originally fixing the number of shares constituting any series of Redwood Empire Bancorp preferred stock, the Redwood Empire Bancorp board of directors may increase or decrease (but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding) the number of shares of any such series subsequent to the issuance of shares of that series. Any shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp preferred stock which may be issued may rank prior to shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock as to payment of dividends and upon liquidation. Redwood Empire Bancorp has not issued any shares of preferred stock and has no current intention of doing so.

Voting rightsRights

     All voting rights with respect to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp are vested in the holders of Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s common stock. Holders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held except that in the election of directors each shareholder has cumulative voting rights and is entitled to as many votes as shall equal the number of shares held by such shareholder multiplied by the number of directors to be elected and such shareholder may cast all his or her votes for a single candidate or distribute such votes among any or all of the candidates he or she chooses. No shareholder shall be entitled to cumulate votes (in other words, cast for any candidate a number of votes greater than the number of shares of

68


stock held by such shareholder) unless such candidate or candidates’ names have been placed in nomination prior to the voting and the shareholder has given notice at the meeting prior to the voting of the shareholder’s intention to cumulate votes. If any shareholder has given such notice, all shareholders may cumulate their votes for candidates in nomination.

64


Preemptive rightsRights

     Shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp common stock have no preemptive rights. Also, there are no applicable conversion rights, redemption rights or sinking fund provisions.

Liquidation rightsRights

     Upon liquidation of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp and satisfaction of creditor claims, the shareholders of Kerman State Bank’sRedwood Empire Bancorp’s common stock have the right to receive their pro rata portion of the assets of the Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp distributable to shareholders.

Provisions of Articles of Incorporation

No provisions of the Articles of Incorporation or the Bylaws of Kerman State Bank have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Kerman State Bank in certain circumstances. The Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws are available upon request of Kerman State Bank.

CERTAIN DIFFERENCES IN RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS

     The following is a general discussion of the material differences between the rights of Westamerica Bancorporation shareholders under the Westamerica Bancorporation articles and bylaws and the rights of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp shareholders under the Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp articles and bylaws and applicable California law.

General

     Westamerica isBancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp are both incorporated under and subject to all the provisions of the General Corporation Law of California. Kerman State Bank is incorporated under and subject to all of the provisions of the California Banking Law and substantially all of the provisions of the California General Corporation Law. Upon consummation of the merger, except for those persons, if any, who dissent from the merger and perfect appraisal rights under the California Law, or receive all cash in the merger, the shareholders of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp will become shareholders of Westamerica.Westamerica Bancorporation.

Declaration of dividends

     Under California Law, the directors of Westamerica may declare and pay dividends upon the shares of its capital stock either out of its retained earnings, or out of capital, provided the company would, after making the distribution, meet two conditions, which generally stated are as follows:

• the corporation’s assets must equal at least 125% of its liabilities; and
• the corporation’s current assets must equal at least its current liabilities or, if the average of the corporation’s earnings before taxes on income and before interest expense for the two preceding fiscal years was less than the average of the corporation’s interest expense for such fiscal years, then the corporation’s current assets must equal at least 125% of its current liabilities.

     Under the California Banking Law, Kerman State Bank may pay a dividend equal to its retained earnings or its net income from the last three years, whichever is less, or, with the prior approval of the Commissioner, it may pay dividends up to the greatest of its retained earnings, its net income for its last fiscal year or its net income for its current fiscal year.

The payment of dividends by Westamerica and Kerman State Bank is also subject to various other laws and regulations described above under “— Restrictions on dividends and other distributions.” Kerman State Bank is also restricted from paying any dividends under the merger agreement.

Cumulative voting

     Shareholders of both Westamerica and Kerman State Bank are entitled to cumulate their votes for the election of directors. Cumulative voting allows a shareholder to cast a number of votes equal to the number of

65


directors to be elected multiplied by the number of shares held in the shareholder’s name on the record date. This total number of votes may be cast for one nominee or may be distributed among as many candidates as the shareholder desires. The candidates (up to the number of directors to be elected) receiving the highest number of votes are elected.

A California corporation that is a “listed corporation” may, by amending its articles or bylaws, eliminate cumulative voting for directors. Because Westamerica’s common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq, it qualifies as a listed corporation. Such an amendment requires the approval of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Westamerica common stock. Westamerica has no present plan to propose an amendment to eliminate cumulative voting.

Classified board of directors

At present, the Westamerica bylaws and the Kerman State Bank bylaws provide directors will be elected for a one-year term at each annual meeting of shareholders. A California corporation that is a “listed corporation” may, by amending its articles or bylaws, provide for a staggered or classified board of directors. Such an amendment requires the approval of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Westamerica common stock. Because Westamerica common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq, it qualifies as a listed corporation. Westamerica has no present plan to propose an amendment to provide for a classified board of directors.

Dissenters’ rights in mergers and other reorganizations

     Under California Corporation Law, a dissenting shareholder of a corporation participating in certain business combinations may, under varying circumstances, receive cash in the amount of the fair market value of his or her shares in lieu of the consideration he or she would otherwise receive under the terms of the transaction. The California General Corporation Law generally does not require dissenters’ rights of appraisal on shares which, immediately prior to the merger, are:

• listed on any national securities exchange certified by the Commissioner or
• listed on the National Market System of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Westamerica common stock is listed on Nasdaq. Westamerica shareholders generally have more limited dissenters’ rights in connection with business combinations than do Kerman State Bank shareholders. Dissenters’ rights are not available to the shareholders of a corporation surviving a merger if no vote of the shareholders of the surviving corporation is required.

Shareholders rights planShareholder Rights Plan

     In December 1986, Westamerica Bancorporation declared a dividend distribution of one common share purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of common stock. The terms of the Rights were amended and restated on September 28, 1989. On March 23, 1995, the board of directors of Westamerica Bancorporation approved a further amendment and restatement of Rights. The Amended and Restated Rights Agreement entitles the holders of each share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock to the right (each, a “Westamerica Bancorporation Right”), when exercisable, to purchase from Westamerica Bancorporation one share of its common stock at a price of $21.667 per share, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. A Westamerica Bancorporation Right is attached to each share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock. The Westamerica Bancorporation Rights only become exercisable and trade separately from Westamerica Bancorporation common stock following the earlier of (i) a public announcement that a person or a group of affiliated or associated persons has become the beneficial owner of Westamerica Bancorporation securities having 15% or more of Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s voting power (an “Acquiring Person”) or (ii) 10 days following the commencement of, or a public announcement of an intention to make, a tender or exchange offer which would result in any person having beneficial ownership of securities having 15% or more of such voting power. Upon becoming exercisable, each holder of a Westamerica Bancorporation Right (other than an Acquiring Person whose rights will become null and void) will, for at least a 60-day period thereafter, have the right (subject to the following sentence), upon payment of the exercise price of $21.667, to receive upon exercise that number of shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock

66


having a market value of twice the exercise price of the Westamerica Bancorporation Right, to the extent available. Subject to applicable law, the board of directors, at its option, may at any time after a Person becomes an Acquiring Person (but not after the acquisition by such Person of 50% or more of the outstanding Westamerica Bancorporation common stock), exchange all or part of the then outstanding and exercisable Westamerica Bancorporation Rights (except for Westamerica Bancorporation Rights which have become void) for shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock equivalent to one share of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock per Westamerica Bancorporation Right or, alternatively, for substitute

69


consideration consisting of cash, securities of Westamerica Bancorporation or other assets (or any combination thereof).

     As a precaution to ensure that it continues to be able to take appropriate action to protect the interests of Westamerica Bancorporation and its shareholders, Westamerica’sWestamerica Bancorporation’s board of directors approved the amendment of its existing Shareholder Rights Plan onin October 28, 1999, to become effective November 19, 1999, to update the existing plan and extend its maturityterm until December 31, 2004. The newplan as amended plan is very similar in purpose and effect to the plan as it existed prior to amendment. It would help the board of directors of Westamerica Bancorporation to maximize shareholder value in the event of a change of control of Westamerica Bancorporation and otherwise to resist actions that the board considers likely to injure Westamerica Bancorporation or its shareholders. The Shareholder Rights Plan as amended and restated is referred to as the “1999 Rights Agreement.”

     In addition to extending the maturity date of the plan an additional five years, the other material changes reflected in the 1999 Rights Agreement include: (1) an increase in the exercise price to $75; (2) a decrease in the redemption price of each Right to $.001; (3) a reduction of the amount of securities required to be acquired or a person or entity to become an “Acquiring Person”, thus triggering the shareholders’ rights, from 15% to 10%; and (4) the replacement of ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, LLC (successor in interest to Chemical Trust Company of California) with Harris Trust and Savings Bank (now Harris Trust Company of California) as the Rights Agent.

     Westamerica Bancorporation intends to amend certain provisions, including the exercise price, and to extend the term of the amended plan beyond its current termination date of December 31, 2004.

Redwood Empire Bancorp has no shareholder rights plan or similar provisions in it articles of incorporation, bylaws or otherwise that would provide similar restrictions on the acquisition of Redwood Empire Bancorp.

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSQuorum for Shareholder Actions

The bylaws of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp require different quorums for shareholder actions. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s bylaws require the presence of a majority of shares entitled to vote in person or by proxy for a quorum. Westamerica Bancorporation’s bylaws require the presence of one-third of the shares entitled to vote in person or by proxy for a quorum.

Number of Directors

Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp vary as to the range of directors allowed to serve on the board of directors. Westamerica Bancorporation’s bylaws allow between eight and fifteen directors. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s bylaws allow between five and nine directors.

Access to Shareholder Records

     Westamerica Bancorporation’s bylaws allow any shareholder or voting trust certificate holder to view its shareholder ledger upon written demand. Redwood Empire Bancorp’s bylaws restrict this right to holders of at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of Redwood Empire Bancorp.

70


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     The board of directors of Kerman State Bank selectedfollowing unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information and explanatory notes present how the firm of Moss Adams, LLP, independent public accountants, to audit and express an opinion on its consolidatedcombined financial statements of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp may have appeared had the businesses actually been combined at the beginning of the period presented. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information shows the impact of the merger of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp on the companies’ respective historical financial positions and results of operations under the purchase method of accounting with Westamerica Bancorporation treated as the acquirer. Under this method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of Redwood Empire Bancorp will be recorded by Westamerica Bancorporation at their estimated fair values as of the date the merger is completed. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information combines the historical financial information of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp as of and for the yearssix months ended December 31, 2001June 30, 2004 and 2000. Representatives of Moss Adams, LLP are expected to be present at the meeting with the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Audit services performed by Moss Adams, LLP for the year ended December 31, 2001, consisted2003. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of their examinationsJune 30, 2004 assumes the merger was completed on that date. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of income give effect to the merger as if the merger had been completed on January 1, 2003. The pro forma information is based on an assumed Westamerica average closing price of $55.25 (the average closing price for the 20 trading days ended October 11, 2004) and a corresponding exchange ratio of 0.3122.

     The merger agreement was announced on August 25, 2004 and provides for each outstanding share of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock other than shares beneficially owned by Redwood Empire Bancorp and Westamerica Bancorporation to be converted into the right to receive $28.74, consisting of $11.49 in cash and $17.25 in shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock, subject to adjustment. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes of Kerman State Bank consultationboth Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp which are incorporated in this document by reference. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” on page 78.

     The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not indicate the financial results of the combined companies had the companies actually been combined at the beginning of each period presented and had the impact of possible revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies, asset dispositions and share repurchases, among other factors, been considered. In addition, as explained in more detail in the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information, the allocation of the purchase price reflected in the pro forma condensed combined financial information is subject to adjustment and may vary from the actual purchase price allocation that will be recorded upon completion of the merger.

71


WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION-REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP

PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)
June 30, 2004
                   
Redwood
WestamericaEmpireDR(CR)Pro Forma
BancorporationBancorpAdjustmentsCombined




Assets
Cash and balances due from depository institutions $185,522  $18,827  $(56,848)[C] $147,501 
Money market assets and funds sold  534   5,600   0   6,134 
Investment securities held-to-maturity  960,522   17,223   0   977,745 
Investment securities available-for-sale  1,024,798   36,300   0   1,061,098 
Loans, net of reserve  2,265,306   417,052   0   2,682,358 
Premises and equipment  35,343   2,191   0   37,534 
Other real estate owned  0   0   0   0 
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles  22,162   1,669   131,550[E]  155,381 
Interest receivable and other assets  117,624   16,559   (7,728)[F]  126,455 
   
   
   
   
 
 Total Assets $4,611,811  $515,421  $66,974  $5,194,206 
   
   
   
   
 
 
Liabilities
Deposits:                
 Non-interest bearing $1,272,278  $117,785  $0  $1,390,063 
 Interest bearing:                
  Transaction  569,575   136,097       705,672 
  Savings  1,072,701   25,115       1,097,816 
  Time  590,875   174,046       764,921 
   
   
       
 
Total deposits  3,505,429   453,043       3,958,472 
Short-term borrowed funds  712,553   1,939   0   714,492 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances  0   0   0   0 
Other borrowed money  0   0   0   0 
Subordinated debentures  0   20,000   0   20,000 
Notes payable  21,429   0   0   21,429 
Liability for interest, taxes and other expenses  42,605   12,171   (3,800)[G]  58,576 
   
   
   
   
 
 Total Liabilities  4,282,016   487,153   (3,800)  4,772,969 
   
   
   
   
 
Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock  224,042   10,520   10,520   315,484 
           (85,342)[C]    
           (6,100)[C]    
           0     
Retained earnings  107,169   17,424   17,424   107,169 
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale  (1,416)  324   324   (1,416)
   
   
   
   
 
 Total Shareholder’s Equity  329,795   28,268   (63,174)  421,237 
   
   
   
   
 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity $4,611,811  $515,421  $(66,974) $5,194,206 
   
   
   
   
 
Shares Outstanding  31,784   4,948   (4,948)  33,329 
           1,545[C]    
Book Value per Share $10.38  $5.71      $12.64 
  
REBC Equivalent Pro Forma
              3.95 

72


WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION-REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP

PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
                   
Redwood
WestamericaEmpireDR(CR)Pro Forma
BancorporationBancorpAdjustmentsCombined




Interest Income
                
Loans $67,425  $12,757  $0  $80,182 
Money market assets and funds sold  1   47   0   48 
Investment securities available for sale  26,928   1,001       27,929 
Investment securities held to maturity  13,328   389   0   13,717 
   
   
   
   
 
  
Total Interest Income
  107,682   14,194   0   121,876 
   
   
   
   
 
Interest Expense
                
Transaction deposits  236   637   0   873 
Savings deposits  2,102   80       2,182 
Time deposits  3,808   1,572       5,380 
Short-term borrowed funds  2,416   13   0   2,429 
FHLB advances  897   26       923 
Debt financing and notes payable  652           652 
Subordinated debentures     827       827 
   
   
   
   
 
  
Total Interest Expense
  10,111   3,155   0   13,266 
   
   
   
   
 
Net Interest Income
  97,571   11,039   0   108,611 
Provision for loan and lease losses  1,500   0   0   1,500 
   
   
   
   
 
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loans and Lease Losses
  96,071   11,039   0   107,111 
Noninterest income:
                
Service charges on deposit accounts  14,228   512   0   14,740 
Merchant credit card processing, net  1,735   2,469       4,204 
Financial services commissions  547   0       547 
Mortgage banking income  263   0       263 
Trust fees  508   0       508 
Realized gains (losses) on held-to-maturity securities  2,183   0       2,183 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (2,204)  0   0   (2,204)
Other fee income  5,266   626   0   5,892 
   
   
   
   
 
  
Total Noninterest income
  22,526   3,607   0   26,133 
   
   
   
   
 
Noninterest Expense
                
Salaries and employee benefits  26,858   5,348   0   32,206 
Occupancy and equipment  8,327   1,075   0   9,402 
Data processing  3,038   578   0   3,616 
Other noninterest expense  11,759   1,750   1,057[E]  14,566 
   
   
   
   
 
 
Total Noninterest Expense
  49,982   8,751   1,057   59,790 
   
   
   
   
 
Income Before Income Taxes
  68,615   5,895   (1,057)  73,453 
Income taxes  19,657   2,356   (444)[H]  21,569 
   
   
   
   
 
Net Income
 $48,958  $3,539  $(613) $51,884 
   
   
   
   
 
Average Shares Outstanding  31,906   4,946   (4,946)  33,451 
           1,545[C]    
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding  32,502   5,093   (5,093)  34,157 
           1,545[C]    
           110[C]    
Net Income per Share (basic) $1.53  $0.72      $1.55 
 
REBC Equivalent Pro Forma
              0.48 
Net Income per Share (fully diluted)  1.51   0.69       1.52 
 
REBC Equivalent Pro Forma
              0.47 
Dividends per Share  0.54   0.42       0.54 
 
REBC Equivalent Pro Forma
              0.17 

73


WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION-REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP

PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(Unaudited)
Year Ended December 31, 2003
                   
Redwood
WestamericaEmpireDR(CR)Pro Forma
BancorporationBancorpAdjustmentsCombined




Interest Income
                
Loans $152,758  $26,636  $0  $179,394 
Money market assets and funds sold  8   43   0   51 
Investment securities available for sale  49,599   2,667       52,266 
Investment securities held to maturity  21,128   788   0   21,916 
   
   
   
   
 
  
Total Interest Income
  223,493   30,134   0   253,627 
   
   
   
   
 
Interest Expense
                
Transaction deposits  727   1,232   0   1,959 
Savings deposits  6,091   164       6,255 
Time deposits  10,167   4,600       14,767 
Short-term borrowed funds  3,415   89   0   3,504 
FHLB advances  5,318   0       5,318 
Debt financing and notes payable  1,479   0       1,479 
Subordinated debentures  0   1,283       1,283 
   
   
   
   
 
 
Total Interest Expense
  27,197   7,368   0   34,565 
   
   
   
   
 
Net Interest Income
  196,296   22,766   0   219,063 
Provision for loan and lease losses  3,300   0   0   3,300 
   
   
   
   
 
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loans and Lease Losses
  192,996   22,766   0   215,763 
Noninterest income:
                
Service charges on deposit accounts  26,381   1,045   0   27,426 
Merchant credit card processing, net  3,619   4,824       8,443 
Financial services commissions  893   0       893 
Mortgage banking income  851   0       851 
Trust fees  995   0       995 
Realized gains on securities  2,443   86       2,529 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (2,166)  0   0   (2,166)
Other fee income  9,900   878   0   10,778 
   
   
   
   
 
 
Total Noninterest income
  42,916   6,833   0   49,749 
   
   
   
   
 
Noninterest Expense
                
Salaries and employee benefits  53,974   9,435   0   63,409 
Occupancy and equipment  17,516   2,105   0   19,621 
Data processing  6,121   1,170   0   7,291 
Other noninterest expense  24,092   3,690   2,114[E]  29,896 
   
   
   
   
 
 
Total Noninterest Expense
  101,703   16,400   2,114   120,217 
   
   
   
   
 
Income Before Income Taxes
  134,209   13,199   (2,114)  145,294 
Income taxes  39,146   5,550   (888)[H]  43,808 
   
   
   
   
 
Net Income
 $95,063  $7,649  $(1,226) $101,487 
   
   
   
   
 
Average Shares Outstanding  32,849   5,026   (5,026)  34,394 
           1,545[C]    
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding  33,369   5,184   (5,184)  35,024 
           1,545[C]    
           110[C]    
Net Income per Share (basic) $2.89  $1.52      $2.95 
 
REBC Equivalent Pro Forma
              0.92 
Net Income per Share (fully diluted)  2.85   1.48       2.90 
 
REBC Equivalent Pro Forma
              0.90 
Dividends per Share  1.00   0.67       1.00 
 
REBC Equivalent Pro Forma
              0.31 

74


NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Note A — Basis of Presentation

     The Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet is based on the previously-reported balance sheets of Westamerica and Redwood Empire as of June 30, 2004, combined as though the merger had taken place on those dates.

     The Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income is based on the statements of income of Westamerica and Redwood Empire for the year ended December 31, 2003 and six months ended June 30, 2004, combined as though the Merger had taken place at the beginning of the periods.

Note B — Methods of Accounting

     Westamerica’s merger with Redwood Empire will be accounted for by Westamerica under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141. Under this method of accounting, the purchase price is allocated to assets acquired and reporting matters.liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the Effective Time. The fair values of Redwood Empire’s assets and liabilities are preliminary and will likely be revised as updated information becomes available prior to the Merger Date.

     The positive effects of potential cost savings and revenue enhancements which may be achieved subsequent to the Westamerica and Redwood Empire merger have not been reflected in the pro forma combined financial statements.

Note C — Purchase Price

     Pursuant to the merger agreement between Westamerica and Redwood Empire, each share of Redwood Empire Bancorp common stock outstanding at the merger closing will be converted into 0.3122 shares of Westamerica Common Stock, subject to certain adjustments. The value of Westamerica common stock to be issued in connection with the merger is approximately $85,342,000 based on the average closing prices of Westamerica common stock for the 20 days preceding October 12, 2004, taken from the prices listed on the NASDAQ National Market System. In addition, outstanding Redwood Empire stock options will be converted into Westamerica stock options. The fair value of the Westamerica options to be issued is approximately $6,100,000, calculated using a trinomial option pricing model and assuming a weighted average exercise price of $21.61, estimated weighted average remaining life of 24 months, a dividend yield of 2.22%, a risk-free rate of return of 3.26%, and volatility of 17.8%. In addition, Redwood Empire shareholders will be paid cash of $11.49 per share, for a total of approximately $56,848,000.

The following summarizes the total purchase price as of June 30, 2004 (in 000’s, except per share amounts):

     
Shares of REBC common stock outstanding  4,948 
Conversion ratio  0.3122 
   
 
Shares of WABC common stock to be issued  1,545 
Market price per share of WABC Common Stock $55.25 
   
 
Total market price of WABC common stock to be issued $85,342 
Value of REBC stock options assumed  6,100 
Shares of REBC common stock outstanding  4,948 
Cash paid per share $11.49 
   
 
Total cash paid  56,848 
Estimated WABC accounting, legal and other costs  3,800 
   
 
Total Purchase Price $152,090 
   
 

75


NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — (Continued)

Note D — Allocation of Purchase Price

The Westamerica/ Redwood Empire purchase price has been allocated as follows (in 000’s):

      
Fair value of net assets of Redwood Empire at June 30, 2004 $28,268 
Net decrease in deferred income tax assets  (7,728)
Intangibles acquired  131,550 
   
 
 Total Purchase Price $152,090 
   
 

     As previously stated, the purchase method of accounting requires that the purchase price be allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their fair values.

     Based upon a preliminary assessment, the book values of Redwood Empire’s assets and liabilities approximate their fair values as of June 30, 2004.

Note E — Intangible Assets and Expenses

     The portion of the purchase price allocated to Intangible assets is comprised of $13,400,000 attributable to value of core deposits being acquired.

The pro forma adjustment to Intangible assets is comprised of the following ($ in 000’s):

     
DR (CR)

Core deposit intangible related to the merger $13,400 
Merchant draft processing intangible  5,000 
Goodwill related to the merger  113,150 
   
 
Total Intangible assets adjustment $131,550 
   
 

     The portion of intangible assets attributable to the value of core deposits being acquired is approximately 4% of Redwood Empire’s noninterest bearing transaction deposits, 4.5% of savings & money market deposits, and 1% of time deposits, for an overall draft processing operations is based on discounted expected future revenues, factoring in expected rates of attrition. The estimated fair values are subject to change as additional information becomes available and preliminary merger plans are finalized prior to the merger date.

     The pro forma adjustment to Intangible assets attributable to core deposit intangibles results in an adjustment to Other expenses for annual amortization of approximately $1,914,000 per year (a seven-year life is assumed for pro forma financial purposes only). The pro forma adjustment to Intangible assets attributable to Redwood Empire’s merchant draft processing activity results in an adjustment to Other expenses for annual amortization of approximately $200,000 per year (a 25-year life is assumed for pro forma financial purposes only).

Note F — Other Assets

     The pro forma adjustment to other assets is comprised of a credit for the deferred tax liability created in connection with the core deposit intangible related to the merger.

Note G — Other Liabilities

     The liability for merger-related costs of $3,800,000 has been recorded in the Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet reflecting management’s estimate of separation and benefit costs related to Redwood Empire’s employees to be terminated, premises expected to be vacated, and other merger costs. This estimated liability is based on preliminary plans which are subject to change as final plans are formulated prior to the merger closing.

Note H — Income Tax Provision

     The income tax provisions for adjustments reflected in the Pro Forma Combined Statements of Income have been computed at Westamerica’s combined federal and state marginal tax rate of 42%.

76


OTHER MATTERS

     The board of directors of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp knows of no other matters which will be brought before the meeting, but if such matters are properly presented, proxies solicited relating to the meeting will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons holding such proxies. All shares represented by duly executed proxies will be voted at the meeting.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT YEAR

Westamerica Bancorporation

The deadline for submitting shareholder proposals for publication in Westamerica Bancorporation’s proxy statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and action on the proxy form for such meeting is 5:00 p.m. on November 15, 2004. Redwood Empire Bancorp does not anticipate that the merger will have occurred by that time, therefore, Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders will not be able to submit such shareholder proposals for the Westamerica Bancorporation 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders based on ownership of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock they receive as merger consideration.

Redwood Empire Bancorp

If the merger occurs, there will be no Redwood Empire Bancorp Annual Meeting of Shareholders for 2005. In case the merger is not completed, Redwood Empire Bancorp shareholders who expect to present a proposal at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for publication in Redwood Empire Bancorp’s proxy statement and action on the proxy form for such meeting must submit their proposal by December 10, 2004. The proposal must be mailed to the Redwood Empire Bancorp Corporate Secretary at 111 Santa Rosa Avenue, Santa Rosa, California 95404-4905. If Redwood Empire Bancorp fails to receive notice of the proposal by such date, Redwood Empire Bancorp will not be required to include the proposal in its proxy statement. In addition to these advance notice requirements, there are other requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a proposal included in the proxy statement under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

EXPERTS

     The consolidated financial statements of Westamerica Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20012003 and 20002002 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001,2003, have been incorporated by reference in this documentherein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent certifiedregistered public accountants,accounting firm, incorporated by reference in this document, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

     The consolidated financial statements of Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp as of December 31, 20012003 and 20002002 and for each of the years in the two-yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2001, included2003, incorporated by reference in this document have been audited by Moss Adams, LLP,Crowe Chizek and Company LLC, independent certifiedregistered public accountants,accounting firm as stated in their reports with respect

67


to such statements, and are includedincorporated by reference in this document in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

LEGAL MATTERS

     Certain legal matters with respect to Westamerica Bancorporation, including the validity of the Westamerica Bancorporation common stock to be issued in connection with the merger, will be passed upon for Westamerica Bancorporation by Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen LLP, San Francisco, California. Certain legal matters with respect to Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp will be passed upon by Nixon PeabodyPillsbury Winthrop LLP, San Francisco, California.

77


INFORMATION CONCERNING WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION

AND REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP MANAGEMENT

     Information concerning:

 • directors and executive officers,officers;
 
 • executive compensation,compensation;
 
 • principal stockholders,stockholders;
 
 • certain relationships and related transactions,transactions; and
 
 • and other related matters concerning Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp,

is included or incorporated by reference in itsthe annual reportreports on Form 10-K of Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2001. Westamerica’s2003. The annual reportreports on Form 10-K isare incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

     Westamerica filesBancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that Westamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire Bancorp files at the Commission’s public reference rooms in Washington, D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public Reference Section of the Commission, 450 5th Street, N.W., Room 1024, Washington, DC 20545 at prescribed rates. Please call the Commission at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. The Commission also maintains an Internet World Wide Web site at “http://www.sec.gov” at which reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp are available. Reports, proxy statements and other information concerning Kerman State Bank may be inspected at the offices of the Nasdaq Stock Market, 1735 K Street, Washington, DC 20006.

     Westamerica Bancorporation has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act relating to the shares of Westamerica Bancorporation common stock to be issued in connection with the merger. This proxy statement/prospectusdocument is part of that registration statement and also constitutes the prospectus of Westamerica filed as partBancorporation and the proxy statement of the registration statement andRedwood Empire Bancorp. This document does not include all the information contained in the registration statement and exhibits to the registration statement. You may copy and read the registration statement and its exhibits at the public reference facilities maintained by the Securities Exchange Commission at the address provided above.

     The Commission allows Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp to “incorporate by reference” information into this proxy statement/prospectus, which means that Westamerica Bancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with the Commission. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this proxy statement/prospectus, except for any information superseded by information contained directly in this proxy statement/prospectus. This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference the documents listed below that Westamerica Bancorporation or Redwood Empire Bancorp has previously filed

78


with the Commission. These documents contain important information about Westamerica Bancorporation and itsRedwood Empire Bancorp and their financial condition.

68


   
Westamerica Bancorporation Commission Filings (File
(File No. 001-09383)Period


Annual Report on Form 10-K Year ended December 31, 20012003
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QQuarters ended March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004
Form 8-K Filed March 8, 2002September 7, 2004; August 27, 2004; July 22, 2004; April 16, 2004; and January 26, 2004
Proxy Statement DatedFiled March 21, 200117, 2004
Registration Statement on Form 8-A Filed March 23, 1995
Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement, Form 8-A/ A Filed November 19, 1999
Redwood Empire Bancorp Commission Filings
(File No. 0-19231)Period


Annual Report on Form 10-KYear ended December 31, 2003
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QQuarters ended March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004
Form 8-KFiled October 7, 2004, August 26, 2004; July 7, 2004; April 8, 2004; April 5, 2004; March 23, 2004; and January 9, 2004
Proxy StatementFiled April 14, 2004
Registration Statement on Form 8-AFiled October 28, 1998

     Westamerica incorporatesBancorporation and Redwood Empire Bancorp incorporate by reference anycertain additional documents that itthey may file with the Commission between the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and the date of the Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp special meeting. These include periodic reports, such as annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports filed on Form 8-K, as well as proxy statements. Westamerica Bancorporation has supplied all information contained or incorporated by reference in the proxy statement/prospectus relating to Westamerica Bancorporation and Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp has supplied all such information relating to Kerman State Bank.Redwood Empire Bancorp.

     This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference documents relating to Westamerica which are not presented in this proxy statement/ prospectus or delivered herewith. Those documents relating to Westamerica are available from Westamerica without charge, excluding all exhibits unless specifically incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus, by requesting them in writing or by telephone from Westamerica Bancorporation, Kris Irvine, Assistant Corporate Secretary, 4550 Mangels Boulevard, Fairfield, California 94585, (707) 863-6826. If you would like to request documents from Westamerica, please do so by                     , 2002, to receive them before the meeting.

     In deciding how to vote on the merger, you should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. Neither Westamerica nor Kerman State Bank has authorized any person to provide you with any information that is different from what is contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus. This proxy statement/ prospectus is dated                     , 2002. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus is accurate as of any date other than such date, and neither the mailing to you of this proxy statement/ prospectus nor the issuance to you of shares of Westamerica common stock will create any implication to the contrary. This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy in any jurisdiction in which, or to any person to whom, it is unlawful.

69


KERMAN STATE BANK

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
and
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2001 and 2000

79


Contents

Page

Independent Auditor’s Report
F-1
Financial Statements
Balance sheetsF-2
Statements of earningsF-3
Statement of shareholders’ equityF-4
Statements of cash flowsF-5
Notes to financial statementsF-6


[MOSS ADAMS LLP LETTERHEAD]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Kerman State Bank

     We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Kerman State Bank as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Bank’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kerman State Bank at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ MOSS ADAMS LLP

Stockton, California

February 15, 2002

F-1


KERMAN STATE BANK

BALANCE SHEETS

           
December 31,

20012000


ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $6,139,670  $9,982,636 
Federal funds sold  12,105,000    
   
   
 
  Total cash and cash equivalents  18,244,670   9,982,636 
Interest-bearing deposits in banks  99,000   194,000 
Securities available-for-sale  16,824,932   21,199,914 
Loans, net  62,915,945   75,646,279 
Bank premises and equipment  1,192,584   1,155,516 
Investment in real estate, net  126,032   414,143 
Interest receivable and other assets  5,925,190   5,196,062 
   
   
 
  $105,328,353  $113,788,550 
   
   
 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits        
 Non-interest-bearing demand $18,941,651  $21,187,723 
 Savings deposits  21,446,464   17,807,515 
 Time and prime, under $100,000  14,227,697   18,145,562 
 Time and prime, $100,000 and over  38,261,499   44,434,168 
   
   
 
  Total deposits  92,877,311   101,574,968 
Accrued interest and other liabilities  555,524   683,579 
Income taxes payable  144,000   619,000 
   
   
 
  Total liabilities  93,576,835   102,877,547 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)      
Shareholders’ equity        
 Common stock, no par value, 3,200,000 shares authorized, 1,427,507 and 1,460,918 shares issued and outstanding, in 2001 and 2000, respectively  7,082,290   7,326,645 
 Retained earnings  4,543,316   3,562,118 
 Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax  125,912   22,240 
   
   
 
  Total shareholders’ equity  11,751,518   10,911,003 
   
   
 
  $105,328,353  $113,788,550 
   
   
 

See accompanying notes

F-2


KERMAN STATE BANK

STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

            
Years Ended December 31,

20012000


Interest income        
 Interest and fees on loans $6,115,427  $7,500,465 
 Securities available-for-sale  1,027,981   1,568,701 
 Federal funds sold  343,645   491,702 
 Deposits in banks  8,085   11,803 
   
   
 
   Total interest income  7,495,138   9,572,671 
Interest expense        
 Deposits  2,690,040   4,089,337 
 FHLB advances     339,754 
   
   
 
   Total interest expense  2,690,040   4,429,091 
   
   
 
   Net interest income  4,805,098   5,143,580 
Provision for loan losses  295,000   590,000 
   
   
 
  Net interest income after provision for loan losses  4,510,098   4,553,580 
Other income        
 Service charges and other income  997,955   933,666 
   
   
 
   Total other income  997,955   933,666 
Other expenses        
 Salaries and wages  1,656,529   1,430,398 
 Employee benefits  443,590   502,849 
 Bank premises and occupancy  160,137   151,129 
 Equipment expenses  187,328   195,870 
 Data processing  321,303   303,545 
 FDIC and state banking assessments  34,486   36,923 
 Directors’ fees  72,563   89,532 
 Provision for loss on foreclosed real estate  139,953   489,422 
 Other real estate owned expenses  191,649   104,635 
 Other operating expenses  797,317   664,031 
   
   
 
   Total other expenses  4,004,855   3,968,334 
   
   
 
  Earnings before income taxes  1,503,198   1,518,912 
Income taxes  522,000   530,000 
   
   
 
  Net earnings $981,198  $988,912 
   
   
 
Net earnings per share — basic and diluted $0.69  $0.68 
   
   
 

See accompanying notes

F-3


KERMAN STATE BANK

STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                           
Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000

Accumulated
Common StockOther

ComprehensiveRetainedComprehensive
SharesAmountIncome (Loss)EarningsIncome (Loss)Total






Balances, January 1, 2000  1,460,918  $7,326,645      $2,865,390  $(283,696) $9,908,339 
Cash dividends            (292,184)     (292,184)
Comprehensive income:                        
 Net earnings       $988,912   988,912      988,912 
 Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $203,957                        
  Unrealized gain on securities        305,936      305,936   305,936 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Comprehensive income (loss)         $1,294,848             
           
             
Balances, December 31, 2000  1,460,918   7,326,645       3,562,118   22,240   10,911,003 
Shares repurchased  (33,411)  (244,355)            (244,355)
Comprehensive income:                        
 Net earnings       $981,198   981,198      981,198 
 Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $69,115                        
  Unrealized gain on securities        103,672      103,672   103,672 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Comprehensive income (loss)         $1,084,870             
           
             
Balances, December 31, 2001  1,427,507  $7,082,290      $4,543,316  $125,912  $11,751,518 
   
   
       
   
   
 

See accompanying notes

F-4


KERMAN STATE BANK

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

            
Years Ended December 31,

20012000


Cash flows from operating activities:        
 Net earnings $981,198  $988,912 
 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash from operating activities:        
  Provision for loan losses  295,000   590,000 
  Provision for loss on foreclosed real estate  139,953   489,422 
  Provision for depreciation, amortization and accretion, net  263,560   262,363 
  Deferred income taxes  207,000   (298,000)
  Loss (gain) on sales of assets  48,954   (46,223)
  Decrease (increase) in interest receivable and other assets  1,170,250   (1,166,314)
  Decrease in investments in real estate  288,111    
  (Decrease) increase in accrued interest, other liabilities and income taxes payable  (810,055)  888,948 
   
   
 
   Net cash from operating activities  2,583,971   1,709,108 
   
   
 
Cash flows from investing activities:        
 Proceeds from maturities of interest bearing deposits in banks  95,000    
 Purchases of securities available-for-sale  (9,867,481)  (1,000,000)
 Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale  10,100,000   1,716,391 
 Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale  4,143,705   2,325,000 
 Net decrease (increase) in loans  9,832,134   (11,761,979)
 Purchases of bank premises and equipment  (129,083)  (38,687)
 Purchases of investments in real estate     (180,794)
 Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate  445,800   740,550 
   
   
 
   Net cash from investing activities  14,620,075   (8,199,519)
   
   
 
Cash flows from financing activities:        
 Net increase (decrease) in demand deposits and savings accounts  1,392,877   (668,473)
 Net increase (decrease) in time deposits  (10,090,534)  6,504,593 
 Repurchase of common stock  (244,355)   
 Dividends paid     (292,184)
   
   
 
   Net cash from financing activities  (8,942,012)  5,543,936 
   
   
 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  8,262,034   (946,475)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  9,982,636   10,929,111 
   
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $18,244,670  $9,982,636 
   
   
 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
 Cash paid during the year for:        
  Interest $2,822,547  $4,387,706 
  Income taxes $507,000  $312,500 

Noncash investing and financing activities:

During 2001, approximately $2,901,000 in loans were transferred to foreclosed real estate.
During 2001, the Bank recognized an unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities of $172,787. As a result, the deferred tax asset was decreased by $69,115 and equity was increased by $103,672.
During 2000, the Bank recognized an unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities of $509,893. As a result, the deferred tax asset was decreased by $203,957 and equity was increased by $305,936.

See accompanying notes

F-5


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     Kerman State Bank (the Bank) provides banking services to their customers primarily in the Kerman area of the Central Valley of California. The Bank operates as a commercial bank in the cities of Kerman, Easton and Firebaugh, California. The Bank provides traditional commercial banking services to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses through three branches serving the surrounding areas. The accounting and reporting policies of the Bank conform to generally accepted accounting principles and general practice within the banking industry.

Principles of consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kerman State Bank, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ker Vest, which was incorporated in November 1995. Ker Vest holds all of the investments in real estate development projects. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation according to generally accepted accounting principles. As of March 2001, Ker Vest was dissolved.

Use of estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents — For purposes of presentation in the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, and federal funds sold.

Securities available-for-sale — Available-for-sale securities consist of bonds, notes and debentures not classified as trading securities or held-to-maturity securities. These securities are carried at estimated fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, accumulated comprehensive income, until realized. Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined using the specific identification method. The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized as adjustments to interest income over the period to maturity.

Loans — Loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income, deferred loan fees, and the allowance for loan losses. Unearned discounts on installment loans are recognized as income over the terms of the loans using a method which approximates the effective interest method. Interest on other loans is calculated by using the effective interest method on the daily balance of the principal amount outstanding.

     Loan fees net of certain direct costs of origination, which represent an adjustment to interest yield, are deferred and amortized over the contractual term of the loan using the interest method.

     Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as non-accrual loans. Accrual of interest on loans is discontinued either when reasonable doubt exists as to the full and timely collection of interest or principal or when a loan becomes contractually past due by ninety days or more with respect to interest or principal. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.

Allowance for loan losses — The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expenses. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb losses inherent in existing loans and commitments to extend credit, based

F-6


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

on evaluations of collectibility and prior loss experience of loans and commitments to extend credit. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem loans, commitments, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay.

     Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of foreclosed assets held for sale, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.

     Impaired loans, as defined, are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The Bank considers a loan impaired when it is probable that all amounts of principal and interest due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, will not be collected, which is the same criteria used for the transfer of loans to non-accrual status. Interest income is recognized on impaired loans in the same manner as non-accrual loans.

Premises and equipment — Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are provided for in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the improvements or the terms of the related leases, whichever is shorter. The straight-line method of depreciation over estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 5 years is followed for financial reporting purposes, but accelerated methods are used for tax purposes. Deferred income taxes have been provided for the resulting depreciation differences.

Foreclosed real estate — Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are to be sold and are initially recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value at the date of foreclosure. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management. Any subsequent revisions in estimates of fair value less cost to sell are reported as adjustments to the carrying amount of the real estate provided that the adjusted carrying amount does not exceed the original carrying amount at the date of foreclosure. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other operating expenses.

Income taxes — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.

Stock based compensation — Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,” requires entities to disclose the fair value of their employee stock options, but permits entities to continue to account for employee stock options under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” The Bank has determined that it will continue to use the method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, which recognizes compensation cost to the extent of the difference between the quoted market price of the stock at the date of grant and the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. The Bank grants stock options to employees with an exercise price equal to the quoted market price of the stock at the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation cost is recognized for stock option grants. Disclosure requirements in accordance with SFAS No. 123 are included in Note 13.

Fair values of financial instruments — The financial statements include various estimated fair value information as of December 31, 2001 and 2000. Such information, which pertains to the Bank’s financial instruments, does not purport to represent the aggregate net fair value of the Bank. Further, the fair value

F-7


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

estimates are based on various assumptions, methodologies and subjective considerations, which vary widely among different financial institutions and which are subject to change. The following methods and assumptions are used by the Bank.

     Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.

     Securities: Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

     Loans receivable: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

     Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable approximate fair value.

     Deposit liabilities: The fair values estimated for demand deposits (interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts for variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of the aggregate expected monthly maturities on time deposits. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

     Off-balance-sheet instruments: Fair values for the Bank’s off-balance-sheet instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the credit standing of the counterparties.

Reclassifications — Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2000 financial statements to conform to the 2001 presentation.

Note 2 — Cash and Due From Banks

     Cash and due from banks includes balances with the Federal Reserve and other correspondent banks. The Bank is required to maintain specified reserves by the Federal Reserve Bank. The average reserve requirements are based on a percentage of the Bank’s deposit liabilities. In addition, the Federal Reserve requires the Bank to maintain a certain minimum balance at all times.

Note 3 — Securities

Amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities available-for-sale as of December 31, 2001 were as follows:

                 
GrossGross
AmortizedUnrealizedUnrealizedEstimated
CostGainsLossesFair Value




Available-for-sale securities:                
U.S. Government Securities $15,236,566  $205,437  $(42,145) $15,399,858 
State and local municipal bonds  1,378,512   46,562      1,425,074 
   
   
   
   
 
  $16,615,078  $251,999  $(42,145) $16,824,932 
   
   
   
   
 

F-8


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3 — Securities (continued)

Amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities available-for-sale as of December 31, 2000 are as follows:

                 
GrossGross
AmortizedUnrealizedUnrealizedEstimated
CostGainsLossesFair Value




Available-for-sale securities:                
U.S. Government Securities $19,679,731  $64,863  $(64,842) $19,679,752 
State and local municipal bonds  1,483,116   40,786   (3,740)  1,520,162 
   
   
   
   
 
  $21,162,847  $105,649  $(68,582) $21,199,914 
   
   
   
   
 

     Securities with a carrying value of $10,414,898 and $17,163,250 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, were pledged as collateral for deposits of public funds.

The amortized cost and an estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2001, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers generally have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

         
AmortizedEstimated
CostFair Value


Due in one year or less $1,647,325  $1,666,639 
Due from one year to five years  2,528,751   2,542,135 
Due from five years to ten years  702,436   737,300 
Due after ten years  11,736,566   11,878,858 
   
   
 
  $16,615,078  $16,824,932 
   
   
 

     Proceeds from the sale of securities available-for-sale were $4,143,705 and $2,325,000 for 2001 and 2000, respectively. There were no gains or losses realized on sales of investment securities in 2001 and 2000.

Note 4 — Loans

Approximately 44% of the Bank’s loans are for agricultural use, 20% are for general commercial use, 33% are for agricultural real estate, and 3% are consumer loans. Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, a significant portion of its customers’ ability to repay the loans is dependent upon the agricultural sector. This is evident by the fact that its customer base is centralized in the largest agricultural producing area in the world. It is generally the Bank’s policy to fully collateralize all loans; however, this is determined on an individual loan basis taking into account the financial stability of each borrower. The collateral held by the Bank may include cash, equipment, crops, accounts receivable, inventories, securities and agricultural real estate. The composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio is as follows:

          
December 31,

20012000


Agricultural loans $28,536,807  $34,317,526 
Commercial loans  12,556,091   12,436,216 
Real estate-mortgage loans  21,275,011   27,387,878 
Installment loans  1,853,181   2,782,190 
   
   
 
   64,221,090   76,923,810 
Less deferred loan fees and costs  (7,472)  (17,562)
Less allowance for loan losses  (1,297,673)  (1,259,969)
   
   
 
 Net loans $62,915,945  $75,646,279 
   
   
 

F-9


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 4 — Loans (continued)

     Impaired loans totaled approximately $2,577,000 and $2,931,000 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. A valuation allowance has been established for these loans totaling approximately $491,000 and $430,000 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. There was no cash received as interest on impaired loans during 2001 or 2000. If the loans had been performing as agreed, interest income would have been recognized totaling approximately $287,000 and $365,000 for 2001 and 2000, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the average recorded investment in loans for which impairment had been recognized was approximately $6,576,000 and $3,190,000, respectively.

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:

          
Years Ended December 31,

20012000


Balance at January 1, $1,259,969  $1,414,900 
Provision for loan losses  295,000   590,000 
Recoveries credited to allowance  55,486   1,632 
Losses charged to allowance  (312,782)  (746,563)
   
   
 
 Balance at December 31, $1,297,673  $1,259,969 
   
   
 

Note 5 — Bank Premises and Equipment

The following is a summary of Bank premises and equipment:

          
December 31,

20012000


Land $153,123  $153,123 
Building improvements  1,029,585   1,018,230 
Furniture and equipment  1,096,382   981,139 
   
   
 
   2,279,090   2,152,492 
 Less accumulated depreciation  (1,086,506)  (996,976)
   
   
 
  $1,192,584  $1,155,516 
   
   
 

     Depreciation expense on premises and equipment was $92,015 and $93,105 in 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Note 6 — Investments in Real Estate

     Ker Vest, the Bank’s real estate subsidiary, owns the Bank’s investments in certain development projects, which consist of acquisition costs and improvements on two residential real estate development projects located in the Central Valley. These projects are now complete. As of March 2001, Ker Vest was dissolved.

     Condensed financial information relative to Ker Vest before elimination of intercompany accounts consisted mainly of cash on hand and the investment at fair value of the real estate development holdings. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, assets in the category of investments in real estate amounted to $-0- and $252,111, respectively.

     The FDIC has adopted regulations governing real estate activities by their insured state banks and their wholly-owned subsidiaries, which effectively prohibit these types of investments. The FDIC has elected to determine on a case-by-case basis the approval of such activities, and the Bank was granted a five-year grace period through December 31, 2000, to continue to sell these holdings. As of February 15, 2001, the seven remaining lots were in escrow and these sales closed in 2001.

F-10


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 5 — Bank Premises and Equipment (continued)

     Other investments in real estate include an investment in a limited partnership. The limited partnership investment is accounted for under the cost method, with holdings in low-income housing projects in order to qualify for tax credits. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, assets in this category amounted to $126,032 and $162,032, respectively. The Bank’s ownership percentage in each year was less than 1%.

Note 7 — Interest Receivable and Other Assets

Interest receivable and other assets are as follows:

         
December 31,

20012000


Foreclosed real estate, net $2,491,685  $ 
Interest income receivable  1,611,633   2,779,828 
Deferred income tax asset  523,000   799,000 
FHLB stock  249,650   425,900 
Prepaid expenses  91,256   79,700 
Other  957,966   1,111,634 
   
   
 
  $5,925,190  $5,196,062 
   
   
 

Note 8 — Deposits

At December 31, 2001 the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:

     
Year Ending
December 31,

2002 $51,630,208 
2003  201,299 
2004   
2005  657,689 
   
 
  $52,489,196 
   
 

Interest expense on deposits is comprised of the following:

         
December 31,

20012000


Interest-bearing demand $213,986  $260,567 
Savings  202,970   338,281 
Time deposits  2,273,084   3,490,489 
   
   
 
  $2,690,040  $4,089,337 
   
   
 

F-11


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9 — Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consist of the following:

          
Years Ended December 31,

20012000


Current        
 Federal $201,000  $590,000 
 State  114,000   238,000 
   
   
 
   315,000   828,000 
Deferred        
 Federal  167,000   (253,000)
 State  40,000   (45,000)
   
   
 
   207,000   (298,000)
   
   
 
  $522,000  $530,000 
   
   
 

The tax effect of temporary differences decreasing the Bank’s deferred tax assets and bringing rise to the deferred tax liabilities is as follows:

            
December 31,

20012000


Deferred tax assets:        
 Allowance for loan losses $454,000  $449,000 
 Deferred compensation  193,000   197,000 
 Non-accrual interest     189,000 
 State income tax     81,000 
 Allowance for foreclosed assets  256,000   201,000 
   
   
 
  Total deferred tax assets  903,000   1,117,000 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
 Depreciation  (179,000)  (167,000)
 Change in accounting method     (43,000)
 Allowance for losses in investments in real estate  (117,000)  (93,000)
 Unrealized loss on securities available for sale  (84,000)  (15,000)
   
   
 
  Total deferred tax liabilities  (380,000)  (318,000)
   
   
 
   Net deferred tax assets $523,000  $799,000 
   
   
 

     Management has assessed the realizability of deferred tax assets and believes it is more likely than not that all deferred tax assets will be realized in the normal course of operations. Accordingly, these assets have not been reduced by a valuation allowance.

Note 10 — FHLB Advances

     The Bank had advances outstanding ranging from $5,000,000 to $7,000,000 in 2000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). These advances to shareholder institutions are collateralized by investment securities and are generally short-term advances maturing in six months. During 2000, the Bank’s interest rate on these borrowings approximated 6.5%. At December 31, 2000, the Bank had no borrowings outstanding. There were no advances outstanding during 2001.

F-12


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 11 — Related Party Transactions

     In the ordinary course of business, the Bank makes loans to officers, directors and their related businesses aggregating approximately $1,822,000 and $2,030,000 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. In management’s opinion, such loans were made on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers of the Bank. The aggregate amount of deposits received from related parties at December 31, 2001 and 2000 was $5,225,135 and $5,954,521, respectively.

Note 12 — Employee Benefit Plans

     During 1998, the Bank created a Simplified Employee Pension plan (SEP) covering substantially all employees. New employees must be employed two years before qualifying for the SEP. Under the provisions of the SEP, the Bank makes contributions to the SEP in the amount of approximately five percent of pre-tax earnings. The Bank contributed approximately $80,000 and $99,000 in 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Note 13 — Stock Option Plan

During 1994, the Bank’s Board of Directors approved a fixed stock option plan accounted for under APB Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations. The plan allows the Bank to grant incentive and nonstatutory stock options to key full-time salaried employees and officers for up to 150,000 shares of common stock. The options have a term of five years when issued and vest over a four-year period, with 20% of the shares exercisable at the beginning of each year the grantee has completed as an employee of the Bank. The exercise price of each option is greater than or equal to the fair market value of the Bank’s stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for the plan. Had compensation cost for the plan been determined based on the fair value of the options at the grant dates consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, the Bank’s net earnings and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below. For those options that are nonstatutory stock options for income tax purposes, the pro forma net earnings reflect the Bank’s estimated future tax deduction upon exercise of the options.

           
December 31,

20012000


Net earnings        
 As reported $981,198  $988,912 
 Pro forma $955,909  $981,141 
Earnings per share        
 Basic and assuming dilution:        
  As reported $0.69  $0.68 
  Pro forma $0.67  $0.67 

     The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2001 and 2000: dividend yield of 0.0 and 2.00 percent a year; expected volatility of 30.4 and 33.60 percent; risk-free interest rates of 4.81 and 6.58 percent; and expected lives of 4.5 years.

F-13


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 13 — Stock Option Plan (continued)

A summary of the status of the Bank’s fixed stock option plan as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and changes during the years then ended are presented below.

                  
20012000


WeightedWeighted
AverageAverage
ExerciseExercise
SharesPriceSharesPrice




Outstanding at beginning of year  12,404  $12.98   15,509  $13.32 
 Granted  55,000  $6.00   1,000  $10.38 
 Exercised    $     $ 
 Forfeited  (4,784) $13.52   (4,105) $13.66 
   
       
     
      $         
Outstanding at end of year  62,620  $6.81   12,404  $12.98 
   
       
     
Options exercisable at year end  3,358  $13.07   6,475  $13.44 
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year     $2.01      $3.35 

The following information applies to options outstanding at December 31, 2001:

Number outstanding62,620
Range of exercise prices$6.00 to $14.70
Weighted-average exercise price$6.81
Weighted-average remaining contractual life4.2 years

Note 14 — Earnings per Share

The Bank computes earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with SFAS No. 128,“Earnings per Share”. SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of basic EPS, which does not consider the effect of common stock equivalents, and diluted EPS, which considers all dilutive common stock equivalents.

             
Year Ended December 31, 2001

IncomeSharesPer-Share
(Numerator)(Denominator)Amount



Basic EPS
            
Net earnings $981,198   1,430,026  $0.69 
   
       
 
Effect of Dilutive Securities
            
Stock options      2,200     
       
     
Diluted EPS
            
Net earnings plus assumed conversions $981,198   1,432,226  $0.69 
   
   
   
 

F-14


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14 — Earnings per Share (continued)

Options to purchase 62,620 shares of common stock at a range of $6.00 – $14.70 a share were outstanding during 2001. There were 7,620 options not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

             
Year Ended December 31, 2000

IncomeSharesPer-Share
(Numerator)(Denominator)Amount



Basic EPS
            
Net earnings $988,912   1,460,918  $0.68 
   
       
 
Effect of Dilutive Securities
            
Stock options           
       
     
Diluted EPS
            
Net earnings plus assumed conversions $988,912   1,460,918  $0.68 
   
   
   
 

     Options to purchase 12,404 shares of common stock at a range of $10.38 – $15.19 a share were outstanding during 2000. They were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

Note 15 — Commitments and Contingencies

     The Bank is obligated for rental payments under certain operating lease agreements. Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 was $47,302 and $65,201, respectively.

At December 31, 2001, the future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows:

     
Year Ending
December 31:

2002 $29,372 
2003  18,372 
2004  18,372 
2005  18,372 
   
 
  $84,488 
   
 

     The Bank is subject to various legal actions and claims arising from normal business activities. Management, based on the advice of legal counsel, believes the ultimate resolution of all pending actions will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Bank.

Note 16 — Financial Instruments

     The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit in the form of loans or through standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in particular classes of financial instruments.

     The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual

F-15


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 16 — Financial Instruments (continued)

amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

      
Contract
Amount

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:    
 Undisbursed loan commitments $14,553,000 
   
 

     Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include agricultural real estate and crops, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties. All of the Bank’s commitments are variable rate with no caps or floors.

     Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2001 are as follows:

          
CarryingEstimated
AmountFair Value


Financial assets:        
 Cash and cash equivalents $18,244,670  $18,244,670 
 Interest bearing deposits $99,000  $99,000 
 Securities available-for-sale $16,824,932  $16,824,932 
 Loans $64,221,090  $64,343,285 
 Interest receivable $1,611,633  $1,611,633 
Financial liabilities:        
 Deposits $(92,877,311) $(92,878,244)
Off-balance sheet liabilities:        
 Commitments to extend credit $  $(146,000)

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2000 are as follows:

          
CarryingEstimated
AmountFair Value


Financial assets:        
 Cash and cash equivalents $9,982,636  $9,982,636 
 Interest bearing deposits $194,000  $194,000 
 Securities available-for-sale $21,199,914  $21,199,914 
 Loans $76,923,810  $76,822,797 
 Interest receivable $2,779,828  $2,779,828 
Financial liabilities:        
 Deposits $(101,574,968) $(101,574,677)
Off-balance sheet liabilities:        
 Commitments to extend credit $  $(199,000)

F-16


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 17 — Regulatory Matters

     The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory — and possibly additional discretionary — actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measure of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

     Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2001 that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

     As of December 31, 2001, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios for December 31, 2001 and 2000 are presented in the following table.

                          
To be Well
Capitalized Under
For CapitalPrompt Corrective
ActualAdequacy Purposes:Action Provisions:



AmountRatioAmountRatioAmountRatio






As of December 31, 2001:                        
 Total capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $12,524,000   16.39% $6,115,000   M8.0% $7,643,000   M10.0%
 Tier I capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $11,564,000   15.13% $3,057,000   M4.0% $4,586,000   M 6.0%
 Tier I capital (to Average Assets) $11,564,000   11.24% $4,114,000   M4.0% $5,143,000   M 5.0%
As of December 31, 2000:                        
 Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $11,978,000   13.06% $7,338,000   M8.0% $9,172,000   M10.0%
 Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $10,830,000   11.81% $3,668,000   M4.0% $5,503,000   M 6.0%
 Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) $10,830,000   9.22% $4,700,000   M4.0% $5,875,000   M 5.0%

     On June 11, 2001, the Bank entered into an agreement with the FDIC and the California Department of Financial Institutions (CDFI). The Board of Directors agreed to reduce the level of classified and non-accrual loans, develop and implement a plan with specific strategies to diversify the loan portfolio and reduce concentration of credit, revise the Bank’s lending and collection policies and review the allowance for loan loss for adequacy each quarter. The FDIC and CDFI also required the Bank to maintain a Tier 1 Leverage Capital ratio of at least nine percent and not pay a dividend without prior consent of the FDIC and CDFI. Management believes that they have complied with the provisions of the agreement.

F-17


KERMAN STATE BANK

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 18 — Restrictions on Retained Earnings

     Under current California state banking laws, the Bank may not pay cash dividends in an amount which exceeds the lesser of retained earnings of the Bank or the Bank’s net earnings for its last three fiscal years, (less the amount of any distributions to shareholders made during that period). If the above requirements are not met, cash dividends may only be paid with the prior approval of the Commissioner of the Department of Financial Institutions, in an amount not exceeding the Bank’s net earnings for its last fiscal year or the amount of its net earnings for its current fiscal year. Accordingly, the future payment of cash dividends will depend on the Bank’s earnings and its ability to meet its capital requirements.

Note 19 — Treasury Stock

     The Bank’s Board of Directors obtained regulatory approval to buy back a maximum of 50,000 shares of its common stock at its market price not to exceed $7.33 per share. During 2001, the Bank purchased 33,411 shares of common stock at a range of $7.25 to $7.33 a share for a total of $244,355.

Note 20 — Merger/Acquisition

     On February 25, 2002 the Bank signed a definitive agreement under which WestAmerica Bancorporation will acquire the Bank in a stock transaction. The Agreement, which has been approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies, is subject to approval by the Bank’s shareholders and banking regulators. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2002.

F-18


AppendixAnnex A

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION

AMONGamong

WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION,

WESTAMERICA BANK,

AND

REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP
and
NATIONAL BANK OF THE REDWOODS

KERMAN STATE BANK

DATED AS OF FEBRUARYDated as of August 25, 20022004

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

           
Page

1. THE MERGER  1 
  1.1 Effective Date  1 
  1.2 Effect of the Merger  1 
2. CONVERSION AND CANCELLATION OF SHARES  2 
  2.1 Conversion of Common Stock of KSB  2 
  2.2 Fractional Shares  4 
  2.3 Surrender of KSB Shares  4 
  2.4 No Further Transfers of KSB Shares  4 
  2.5 Adjustments  4 
  2.6 Treatment of Stock Options  5 
3. COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES  5 
  3.1 Covenants of WABC  5 
    (a) Reservation, Issuance and Registration of WABC Common Stock  5 
    (b) Government Approvals  5 
    (c) Notification of Breach of Representations, Warranties and Covenants  6 
    (d) Financial Statements  6 
    (e) Press Releases  6 
    (f) Business Combinations  6 
    (g) Director and Officer Liability  6 
  3.2 Covenants of KSB  7 
    (a) Approval by KSB Shareholders  7 
    (b) Shareholder Lists and Other Information  7 
    (c) Government Approvals  7 
    (d) New Branches and Leases  7 
    (e) Notification of Breach of Representations, Warranties and Covenants  7 
    (f) Financial Statements  7 
    (g) Compensation  8 
    (h) Conduct of Business in the Ordinary Course  8 
    (i) Press Releases  10 
    (j) No Merger or Solicitation  10 
    (k) Employee Benefit Plans  11 
    (l) Changes in Capital Stock  11 
    (m) Dividends  11 
    (n) Accounting Methods  11 
    (o) Affiliates  11 
    (p) Additional Agreements  11 
    (q) Access to Properties, Books and Records; Confidentiality  12 

i


           
Page

    (r) Noncompetition Agreements  12 
    (s) Classifications and Litigation Developments  12 
    (t) Accounting Adjustment before Closing  12 
  3.3 Covenants of the Parties  12 
    (a) Information and Confidentiality  12 
    (b) Asset Review  12 
4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF KSB  13 
    (a) Corporate Status and Power to Enter Into Agreements  13 
    (b) Articles, Bylaws, Books and Records  13 
    (c) Compliance With Laws, Regulations and Decrees  14 
    (d) Capitalization  14 
    (e) Equity Interests  14 
    (f) Financial Statements, Regulatory Reports  14 
    (g) Tax Returns  15 
    (h) Material Adverse Change  15 
    (i) No Undisclosed Liabilities  16 
    (j) Properties and Leases  16 
    (k) Material Contracts  17 
    (l) Classified Loans  17 
    (m) Restrictions on Investments  17 
    (n) Employment Contracts and Benefits  17 
    (o) Compliance With ERISA  19 
    (p) Collective Bargaining and Employment Agreements  19 
    (q) Compensation of Officers and Employees  19 
    (r) Legal Actions and Proceedings  19 
    (s) Execution and Delivery of the Agreement  20 
    (t) Retention of Broker or Consultant  20 
    (u) Insurance  20 
    (v) Loan Loss Allowance  20 
    (w) Transactions With Affiliates  21 
    (x) Information in WABC Registration Statement  21 
    (y) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties  21 
    (z) No Brokered Deposits  21 
5. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF WABC and WESTAMERICA  21 
    (a) Corporate Status and Power to Enter Into Agreement  21 
    (b) Corporate Status and Power of WABC and Westamerica  22 
    (c) Certificate, Bylaws, Books and Records  22 
    (d) Compliance With Laws, Regulations and Decrees  22 
    (e) Financial Statements  22 

ii


           
Page

    (f) Material Adverse Change  23 
    (g) Execution and Delivery of the Agreement  23 
    (h) Information in WABC Registration Statement  23 
    (i) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties  23 
    (j) Employee Benefits  24 
    (k) Legal Actions and Proceedings  24 
6. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933; SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  24 
    (a) Preparation and Filing of Registration Statement  24 
    (b) Effectiveness of Registration Statement  25 
    (c) Sales and Resales of Common Stock  25 
    (d) Rule 145  25 
7. CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF WABC  25 
    (a) Representations and Warranties  25 
    (b) Compliance and Performance Under Agreement  25 
    (c) Material Adverse Change  26 
    (d) Approval of Agreement  26 
    (e) Officer’s Certificate  26 
    (f) Opinion of Counsel  26 
    (g) Absence of Legal Impediment  26 
    (h) Effectiveness of Registration Statement  26 
    (i) Government Approvals  26 
    (j) Tax Opinion or Ruling  26 
    (k) Accountant’s Assurance  27 
    (l) Dissenting Shares  27 
    (m) Unaudited Financials  27 
    (n) Rule 145 Undertaking  27 
    (o) Shareholders’ Equity  28 
    (p) Loans and Demand Deposits  28 
    (q) Significant Liabilities  28 
    (r) Closing Documents  28 
    (s) Consents  28 
    (t) Losses in Investment and Loan Portfolios  28 
    (u) Satisfaction of Spending or Other Commitments  28 
    (v) Compliance Examinations  28 
    (w) Opinion of Loan Review Examiner  28 
    (x) Regulatory Examination  29 
    (y) Noncompetition Agreements  29 
    (z) Resignation of Directors  29 

iii


           
Page

8. CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF KSB  29 
    (a) Representations and Warranties  29 
    (b) Compliance and Performance Under Agreement  29 
    (c) Material Adverse Change  29 
    (d) Officer’s Certificate  29 
    (e) Approval of Agreement  29 
    (f) Opinion of Counsel  29 
    (g) Effectiveness of Registration Statement  29 
    (h) Government Approvals  29 
    (i) Tax Opinion or Ruling  29 
    (j) Closing Documents  30 
    (k) Absence of Legal Impediment  30 
    (l) Fairness Opinion  30 
9. CLOSING  30 
    (a) Closing Date  30 
    (b) Delivery of Documents  30 
    (c) Filings  30 
10. [RESERVED]  30 
11. EXPENSES  30 
12. AMENDMENT; TERMINATION  30 
    (a) Amendment  30 
    (b) Termination  31 
    (c) Notice  31 
    (d) Breach of Obligations  32 
    (e) Termination and Expenses  32 
    (f) Liquidated Damages  32 
13. MISCELLANEOUS  33 
    (a) Notices  33 
    (b) Binding Agreement  33 
    (c) No Survival of Representations and Warranties  33 
    (d) Governing Law  33 
    (e) Attorneys’ Fees  33 
    (f) Entire Agreement; Severability  33 
    (g) Counterparts  33 
    (h) Specific Performance  34 
    (i) Waivers  34 

iv


AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION

     THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, dated as of FebruaryAugust 25, 2002,2004, is betweenamong WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION, a California corporation (“WABC”Westamerica”), WESTAMERICA BANK, a California banking corporation (“Westamerica”WAB”), REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP, a California corporation (“Redwood Empire”), and KERMAN STATENATIONAL BANK OF THE REDWOODS, a Californianational banking association (“KSB”NBR”).

RECITALS

     A. The Boards of Directors of WABC, Westamerica, WAB, Redwood Empire and KSBNBR deem it advisable and in the best interests of WABC, Westamerica, KSBWAB, Redwood Empire, NBR and their respective shareholders that WABC, Westamerica, WAB, Redwood Empire and KSBNBR enter into a business combination whereby KSBRedwood Empire shall merge with and into Westamerica (the “Merger”) and NBR shall thereafter merge with and into WAB (the “Bank Merger” and together with the Merger, the “Mergers”).

     B. This Agreement and the Merger Agreement, as defined herein, have been approved by the Boards of Directors of WABC, Westamerica, WAB, Redwood Empire and KSB,NBR, and will be submitted for approval of the shareholders of KSBRedwood Empire at a special meeting of KSB’s shareholders.Redwood Empire’s shareholders upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

     C. The Merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of the provisions of Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”)., with respect to the shares of Westamerica common stock to be issued in connection with the Merger.

     D. Pursuant to the Merger and subject to the terms and conditions hereof, each share of KSBRedwood Empire common stock (other than fractional shares or any shares as to which dissenters’ rights have been perfected) shall be converted into the right to receive cash and that number of shares of WABCWestamerica common stock determined in accordance with the Final Exchange Ratio set forth in Section 2.1, below, subject to adjustment as more fully set forth in this Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual agreements, representations and warranties contained herein and in the Merger Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.     THE MERGER.The Merger and Bank Merger.

     1.1 Effective Date.

(a) Merger. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Merger shall become effective upon the filing with the California Secretary of State and the California Department of Financial Institutions (the “DFI”) of a duly executed Agreement of Merger substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Merger Agreement”) and officers’ certificates prescribed by Section 1103 of the California General Corporation Law (the “GCL”), or at such time thereafter as is provided in the Merger Agreement (the “Effective Time”). The date on which the Effective DateTime occurs as specified in the Merger Agreement shall be referred to herein as the “Effective Date.”

     (b) Bank Merger. The Bank Merger shall become effective upon the filing with the California Secretary of State and the California Department of Financial Institutions (the “DFI”) of a duly executed Agreement of Merger satisfactory to Westamerica (the “Bank Merger Agreement”) and officers’ certificates prescribed by Section 1103 of the GCL.

1.2 Effect of the Mergers.

(a) Merger. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Merger Agreement, on the Effective Date, KSBRedwood Empire shall be merged with and into Westamerica and Westamerica shall be the surviving corporation (the “Surviving Corporation”) in the Merger. All assets, rights, goodwill, privileges, immunities, powers, franchises and interests of KSBRedwood Empire and Westamerica in and to every type of property (real, personal and mixed) and choses in action, as they exist as of the Effective Date, including appointments, designations and nominations and all other rights and interests as trustee, executor, administrator,administra-

1


tor, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of estate, assignee, receiver and in every other fiduciary capacity, shall pass and be transferred to and vest in the Surviving Corporation by virtue of the Merger on the Effective Date without any deed, conveyance or other transfer; the separate existence of KSBRedwood Empire shall cease and the corporate existence of Westamerica as the Surviving Corporation shall continue unaffected and unimpaired by the Merger; and the Surviving Corporation shall be deemed to be the same entity as each of KSBRedwood Empire and Westamerica and shall be subject to all of their duties and liabilities of every kind and description. The Surviving Corporation shall be responsible and liable for all the liabilities and obligations of each of Westamerica and KSB;Redwood Empire; and any claim existing or action or proceeding pending by or against Westamerica or KSBRedwood Empire may be prosecuted as if the Merger had not taken place, or the Surviving Corporation may be substituted in its place. Neither the rights of creditors nor any liens upon the property of either Westamerica or KSBRedwood Empire shall be impaired by reason of the Merger.

A-1


2.     CONVERSION AND CANCELLATION OF SHARES.(b) Bank Merger. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Bank Merger Agreement, promptly after the Effective Date, NBR shall be merged with and into WAB and WAB shall be the surviving corporation (the “Surviving Bank”) in the Bank Merger. The effect of the Bank Merger shall be as provided by applicable law. The Surviving Bank shall be responsible and liable for all the liabilities and obligations of each of WAB and NBR; and any claim existing or action or proceeding pending by or against WAB or NBR may be prosecuted as if the Bank Merger had not taken place, or the Surviving Bank may be substituted in its place. Neither the rights of creditors nor any liens upon the property of either WAB or NBR shall be impaired by reason of the Bank Merger.

2.Conversion and Cancellation of Shares

     2.1 Conversion of Common Stock of KSB.Redwood Empire.

     (a) Preliminary Exchange Ratio. For purposesCancellation of determining the conversionShares held by Redwood Empire Subsidiaries. All shares of KSB common stock intoof Redwood Empire (“Redwood Empire Shares” and each a “Redwood Empire Share”) that are owned directly or indirectly by any subsidiary of Redwood Empire (other than shares held in trust or otherwise for the merger consideration, the following procedures and defined termsbenefit of a third party or as pledgee) shall be employed:

     “Unadjusted Aggregate Purchase Price” means
     (i) if Performing Loans are at least $60,000,000, then 1.6 multiplied by Adjusted Equity; or
     (ii) if Performing Loans are less than $60,000,000, then the sum of:

     (a) 1.6 multiplied by that portion of Adjusted Equity equal to (x) Performing Loans, divided by (y) 6.56, and
     (b) 1.0 multiplied by the remainder of Adjusted Equity.

     “Adjusted Equity” means $9,861,000

     (i) plus 60% of the amount by which KSB’s allowance for loan losses, determined under Westamerica’s methodology for determining the allowance, is or would be less than $2,400,000, but only if Performing Loans are at least $60,000,000, or
     (ii) less 60% of the amount by which KSB’s allowance for loan losses, determined under Westamerica’s methodology for determining the allowance, is or would be greater than $3,200,000, up to $3,900,000.

     “GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles.
     “Performing Loans” means the principal balance of the loans owned by KSB other than any of the following:

     (i) loans on nonaccrual status;
     (ii) loans on which payments of principal or interest are delinquent 90 days or more from their contractual payment date; and
     (iii) loans which are “troubled debt restructurings” as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15 (“SAS 15”): Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings.”

     “Preliminary Exchange Ratio” means Unadjusted Per Share Purchase Price divided by the Average Starting Price.
     “Unadjusted Per Share Purchase Price” is Unadjusted Aggregate Purchase Price divided by number outstanding KSB shares of common stock determined on a fully diluted basis using the treasury method.
     “Average Starting Price” means $39.77.

(b) Significant Liability Adjustment; Pre-Final Exchange Ratio. WABCcancelled and KSBretired and shall first determine the Preliminary Exchange Ratio. Then theycease to exist, and no Merger Consideration (as defined below) shall determine the amount of Significant Liabilities if any and determine the Pre-Final Exchange Ratio.be delivered in exchange therefor.

     “Pre-Final Exchange Ratio” means the Preliminary Exchange Ratio less a fraction, of which (i) the numerator is Significant Liabilities and (ii) the denominator is 1.6 multiplied by Adjusted Equity.

          “Significant Liabilities” means those liabilities or expenses (whether operating or capital in nature) in excess of $100,000 in the aggregate, relating to those categories and events described in the next sentence that have not been reflected as reductions to KSB’s consolidated book value pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles as of June 30, 2001, except that the $100,000 threshold shall not apply to amounts described in clause (viii). Significant Liabilities shall include the following categories or events, provided that Significant Liabilities shall not include any of the following to which WABC has consented in writing, which

2


consent shall not be unreasonably withheld: (i) new or extended contractual obligations; (ii) new or extended leases of real or personal property; (iii) acquisition of capital assets (or commitments to do so) in excess of $25,000 in the aggregate; (iv) contingent liabilities based upon threatened or pending litigation, arbitrations or other proceedings or hazardous or toxic substances and legal fees and costs (whether actual or estimated) related thereto; (v) any expenses, fines, fees, penalties or similar obligations, except those which arose in the Ordinary Course of Business as defined in Section 3.2(h)(i); (vi) any new, expanded or accelerated pension or other benefits including employment contracts and severance payments, whether or not vested; (vii) any amount paid to investment bankers, lawyers, accountants or other professionals in conjunction with the transaction that exceeds $470,000 in the aggregate; and (viii) the amount by which KSB’s allowance for loan losses exceeds $3,900,000, an amount that would equal the amount necessary to bring KSB’s allowance for loan losses into compliance with WABC’s methodology for determining the adequacy of such allowance (but only to the extent KSB’s allowance as so determined would exceed $3,900,000), the amount of interest accrued on loans for which full repayment of principal is not likely as of the day immediately preceding the Effective Date and not previously reversed, and any additional amount of write-down of other real estate owned or other property acquired through foreclosure or satisfaction of debt required to conform such property’s valuation with WABC’s valuation methods for such types of property.

          The amount of the Significant Liabilities in the case of the arrangements described in (i), (ii), and (vi) above, shall equal (a) any payment that could be made as of the Effective Date that would terminate the arrangement without further liability or expense to KSB or WABC or (b) if the arrangement does not provide for such a payment, the present value of the amount of the remaining payments payable pursuant to the arrangement after the Effective Date using a discount rate equivalent to WABC’s then current cost of funds. The amount of Significant Liabilities in the case of (iii) above shall equal the amount expended or required to be expended under binding commitments for a capital asset, minus the amount for which the capital asset could actually be sold on a liquidation basis.

Conversion.(c) Average Closing Price Adjustment; Final Exchange Ratio. If, as of two business days preceding the Effective Date, the Average Closing Price of WABC Common Stock is greater than $41.76, the Pre-Final Exchange Ratio shall be adjusted by multiplying it by a fraction, of which (i) the numerator is $41.76 and (ii) the denominator is the Average Closing Price, with the result rounded to four decimal places. If, as of two business days preceding the Effective Date, the Average Closing Price of WABC Common Stock is less than $33.80, the Pre-Final Exchange Ratio shall be adjusted by multiplying it by a fraction, of which (i) the numerator is $33.80 and (ii) the denominator is the Average Closing Price, with the result rounded to four decimal places.

          “Average Closing Price” means average of the closing prices quoted on the Nasdaq National Market as reported in The Wall Street Journal on each of the 20 consecutive trading days prior to two business days prior to the Effective Date, rounded to four decimal places, whether or not trades occurred on those days

          “Final Exchange Ratio” means the Pre-Final Exchange Ratio as adjusted, if required, by the foregoing adjustment on account of the Average Closing Price.

(d) Conversion. On the Effective Date, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any common stock of KSB (a “KSB Share” or “KSB Shares”),Redwood Empire Share, each outstanding KSBRedwood Empire Share (other than fractional shares or any shares as to which dissenters’ rights have been perfected) shall be converted into a numberthe right to receive per share merger consideration (the “Merger Consideration”) in the amount of $28.74 per share, consisting of $11.49 in cash (the “Cash Portion”) and $17.25 in shares of the common stock, without par value, of WABCWestamerica (“WABCWestamerica common stock” or “WABC“Westamerica Shares”) (the “Stock Portion”), subject to the adjustments described in subsection (c) below.

(c) Conversion of Stock Portion. The number of Westamerica Shares into which the Stock Portion of each Redwood Empire Share shall be converted (the “Stock Portion Exchange Ratio”) shall be equal to the Final Exchange Ratio.following, in each case rounded to four decimal places:

     (i) if the Westamerica Average Closing Price is not less than $45.4950 and not more than $55.6050, a fraction (i) the numerator of which is $17.25 and (ii) the denominator of which is the Westamerica Average Closing Price (as defined below);
     (ii) if the Westamerica Average Closing Price is greater than $55.6050, a fraction (i) the numerator of which is $17.25 and (ii) the denominator of which is $55.6050.
     (iii) if the Westamerica Average Closing Price is less than $45.4950, a fraction (i) the numerator of which is $17.25 and (ii) the denominator of which is $45.4950.
     (iv) “Westamerica Average Closing Price” means the average of the closing prices of Westamerica Shares quoted on the Nasdaq National Market as reported in The Wall Street Journal on each of the last 20 trading days on which trades in Westamerica’s shares occur ending on the day which is the day prior to two Business Days prior to the Effective Date, whether or not trades occurred on those days, rounded to

2


four decimal places. As used herein, “Business Day” shall mean a day on which banks in the State of California are not authorized or required by law to be closed.
     (v) For example, assuming the base market price for Westamerica common stock is $50.55, the top end of the collar is $55.6050, and the low end of the collar is $45.4950:

     (x) if the Westamerica Average Closing Price is $52.50, then the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio would have a numerator of $17.25 and a denominator of $52.50; the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio would therefore be 0.3286; the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio times one share of Westamerica common stock would have a nominal value at that time of 0.3286 multiplied by $52.50 or $17.25, and the Merger Consideration would consist of a Cash Portion of $11.49 plus a Stock Portion of $17.25 for a total of $28.74;
     (y) if the Westamerica Average Closing Price is $57.50, then the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio would have a numerator of $17.25 and a denominator of $55.6050; the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio would therefore be 0.3102; the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio times one share of Westamerica common stock would have a nominal value at that time of 0.3102 multiplied by $57.50 or $17.8365, and the Merger Consideration would consist of a Cash Portion of $11.49 plus a Stock Portion of $17.8365 for a total of $29.3265;
     (z) if the Westamerica Average Closing Price is $42.50, then the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio would have a numerator of $17.25 and a denominator of $45.4950; the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio would therefore be 0.3792; the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio times one share of Westamerica common stock would have a nominal value at that time of 0.3792 multiplied by $42.50 or $16.1160, and the Merger Consideration would equal a Cash Portion of $11.49 plus a Stock Portion of $16.1160 for a total of $27.6060.

     (e)Provided, if Westamerica is required to make a Lake County Divestiture (as defined in Section 7(i)), then the Stock Portion, the Cash Portion and the Merger Consideration shall be reduced in accordance with the following table:

                     
If the volume of deposits thatOver $10Over $20
Westamerica is required toInitialUp tomillion tomillion toOver $30
divest in Lake County isValue$10 million$20 million$30 millionmillion






Stock Portion $17.25  $17.19  $17.16  $17.10  $17.07 
Cash Portion  11.49   11.45   11.43   11.39   11.37 
Merger Consideration  28.74   28.64   28.59   28.49   28.44 

and references in this subsection (c) above to “$11.49,” “$17.25” and “$28.74” shall be deemed to be references to the applicable respective reduced values in the table above.

     (d) Cancellation and Exchange of KSBRedwood Empire Shares. Upon conversion of KSBRedwood Empire Shares into WABC Sharesthe Merger Consideration in accordance with the foregoing, all KSBRedwood Empire Shares shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and each certificate previously representing any such shares shall thereafter represent the WABCcash and Westamerica Shares (and cash for fractional shares) into which such KSBRedwood Empire Shares have been converted. Certificates previously representing KSBRedwood Empire Shares (other than dissenting shares) shall be exchanged for cash and certificates representing whole shares of WABCWestamerica common stock issued in consideration therefor upon the surrender of such certificates in accordance with Section 2.3.

3


(f) (e) Rights as Shareholders. From and after the Effective Date, the holders of certificates formerly representing KSBRedwood Empire Shares shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto other than any dissenters’ rights they have perfected pursuant to Chapter 13 of the GCL.

     (f) Redwood Empire Dissenting Shares. Any Redwood Empire Shares held by “dissenting shareholders” within the meaning of Chapter 13 of the GCL and which the holders thereof have not withdrawn or caused to lose their status as “dissenting shareholders” shall not be converted into the Merger Consideration, but shall, after the Effective Date, be entitled to only such rights as are granted them by Chapter 13 of the

3


GCL. Each dissenting shareholder who is entitled to payment for such shareholder’s Redwood Empire Shares shall receive such payment therefor from the Surviving Corporation in an amount determined pursuant to Chapter 13 of the GCL.

2.2 Fractional Shares. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, no fractional shares of WABCWestamerica common stock shall be issued to holders of KSBRedwood Empire Shares. In lieu thereof, each such holder entitled to a fraction of a share of WABCWestamerica common stock shall receive, at the time of surrender of the certificate or certificates representing such holder’s KSBRedwood Empire Shares, an amount in cash equal to the Westamerica Average Closing Price multiplied by the fraction of a share of WABCWestamerica common stock to which such holder otherwise would be entitled. No such holder shall be entitled to dividends, voting rights, interest on the value of, or any other rights in respect of a fractional share. Fractional shares shall be determined on an aggregate basis for each KSBRedwood Empire shareholder and not on a per-shareper share basis.

2.3     Surrender of KSB
2.3 Surrender of Redwood Empire Shares.

     (a) Prior to the Effective Date, WABCWestamerica shall appoint Computershare Investor Services, LLC, or its successor, or any other bank or trust company (having capital of at least $50$150 million) mutually acceptable to KSBRedwood Empire and WABC,Westamerica, as exchange agent (the “Exchange Agent”) for the purpose of exchanging certificates representing the KSB Shares and at and afterRedwood Empire Shares. At the Effective Date, WABCWestamerica shall issue and deliver to the Exchange Agent cash and certificates representing the WABCnumber of Westamerica Shares as shall be required to be delivered to holders of KSBRedwood Empire Shares as the aggregate Merger Consideration pursuant to SectionArticle 2 of this Agreement. As soon as practicableWestamerica shall direct the Exchange Agent to mail, promptly after the Effective Date, to each holder of KSBa certificate or certificates which immediately prior to the Effective Date represented outstanding Redwood Empire Shares a letter of transmittal and instructions for use in effecting the surrender of such certificates in exchange for certificates representing shares of Westamerica common stock and cash as provided in this Agreement, both of which shall be reasonably satisfactory to Redwood Empire. Each holder of Redwood Empire Shares converted pursuant to Section 2.1, upon surrender to the Exchange Agent of one or more certificates for such KSBRedwood Empire Shares for cancellation, will be entitled to receive the amount of cash and a certificate representing the number of WABCWestamerica Shares determined in accordance with Section 2.1 and a payment in cash with respect to fractional shares, if any, determined in accordance with Section 2.2.2.1. Each certificate representing WABCWestamerica Shares will bear a notation incorporating by reference the Amended Rights Agreement (as that term is defined in Section 5(j) herein), by referenceof Westamerica, and certificates representing the WABCWestamerica Shares will evidence and entitle the holders thereof to certain rights as set forth in and subject to the terms of the Amended Rights Agreement (the “Rights”). Certificates issued for the WABCWestamerica Shares shall be deemed to be certificates for the Rights.

     (b) No dividends or other distributions of any kind which are declared payable to shareholders of record of the WABCWestamerica Shares after the Effective Date will be paid to persons entitled to receive such certificates for WABCWestamerica Shares until such persons surrender their certificates representing KSBRedwood Empire Shares. Upon surrender of such certificate representing KSBRedwood Empire Shares, the holder thereof shall be paid, without interest, any dividends or other distributions with respect to the WABCWestamerica Shares as to which the record date and payment date occurred on or after the Effective Date and on or before the date of surrender.

     (c) If any certificate for WABCWestamerica Shares is to be issued in a name other than that in which the certificate for KSBRedwood Empire Shares surrendered in exchange therefor is registered, it shall be a condition of such exchange that the person requesting such exchange shall pay to the Exchange Agent any transfer costs, taxes or other expenses required by reason of the issuance of certificates for such WABCWestamerica Shares in a name other than the registered holder of the certificate surrendered, or such persons shall establish to the satisfaction of WABCWestamerica and the Exchange Agent that such costs, taxes or other expenses have been paid or are not applicable.

     (d) All dividends or distributions, and any cash to be paid pursuant to Section 2.2 in lieu of fractional shares, if held by the Exchange Agent for payment or delivery to the holders of unsurrendered certificates representing KSBRedwood Empire Shares and unclaimed at the end of one year from the Effective Date, shall (together with any interest earned thereon) at such time be paid or redelivered by the Exchange Agent to WABC,Westamerica, and after such time any holder of a certificate representing KSBRedwood Empire Shares who has not surrendered such certificate to the Exchange Agent shall, subject to applicable law, look as a general

4


creditor only to WABCWestamerica for payment or delivery of such dividends or distributions or cash, as the case may be.

     2.4 No Further Transfers of KSBRedwood Empire Shares.At the Effective Date, the stock transfer books of KSBRedwood Empire shall be closed and no transfer of KSBRedwood Empire Shares theretofore outstanding shall thereafter be made.

     2.5 Adjustments.If, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Date, the outstanding shares of WABCWestamerica common stock shall have been changed into a different number of shares or a different class

4


by reason of any reclassification, recapitalization, split up, combination, exchange of shares or readjustment, or a stock dividend thereon shall be declared with a record date within such period, the Westamerica Average Closing Price and the number of WABCWestamerica Shares to be issued and delivered in the Merger in exchange for the Stock Portion of each outstanding KSBRedwood Empire Share and shall be correspondingly adjusted.

     2.6 Treatment of Stock Options.Each person holding one or more options to purchase KSBRedwood Empire Shares pursuant to the Kerman State Bank 1994Redwood Empire 1991 Stock Option Plan (theor 2001 Stock Option Plan (each as amended, collectively, the “Option Plan”) (or who was granted an option as a result of his or her commencement of employment by Redwood Empire or NBR) (all such options being collectively hereinafter referred to as the “Redwood Options”) shall have the right, in his or her discretion, to:

      (a) Exercise prior to or at the Effective Time (which exercise may be made subject to the Effective Time having occurred) any Redwood Options outstanding that were exercisable prior to the Effective Time, including those that become exercisable on an accelerated basis under their terms or the terms of grant of which provide for such acceleration (any Redwood Empire Shares covered by any such options which are exercised at or immediately prior to the Effective Date any options granted underTime, to be exchanged for the Option Plan that were vested prior toMerger Consideration upon the occurrence of the Effective Date. If an optionee with respect to the Option Plan has not terminated his or her employment with KSB before the date of this Agreement, his or her options that are not vested on that date shall become fully exercisable immediately prior to the Effective Date following notice by KSB to the extent the terms of the Option Plan provide for such acceleration;Time); and/or
 
      (b) Have any options that are not exercised converted into an option to purchase shares of WABCWestamerica common stock in the following manner:

      (i) Following the Effective Date,Time, shares of WABCWestamerica common stock shall be substituted under the options for KSBRedwood Empire Shares based on the FinalOption Exchange Ratio (as defined below) in a form acceptable to WABC.Westamerica. Specifically, each option shall be deemed to continue as an option to purchase the number of shares of WABCWestamerica common stock equal to the FinalOption Exchange Ratio multiplied by the number of KSBRedwood Empire Shares previously covered by such option and rounded down to the nearest whole share at an option exercise price for each such share of WABCWestamerica common stock equal to the previous option exercise price for each KSBRedwood Empire Share divided by the FinalOption Exchange Ratio.Ratio and rounded up to the nearest whole cent. Except as notedspecified below, each KSBRedwood Empire stock option shall otherwise continue on terms and conditions that are consistent with those that were applicable onat the Effective Date, including accelerated vesting to the extent provided in the Option Plan; i.e., options for KSB shares that became fully vested as a result of the Merger will be converted into fully vested options for shares of WABC common stock.Time.
 
      (ii) KSBThe “Option Exchange Ratio” means a fraction, (a) the numerator of which is the sum of (1) the Cash Portion plus (2) the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio multiplied by the Westamerica Average Closing Price, and (b) the denominator of which is the applicable denominator used in Section 2.1(c) to determine the Stock Portion Exchange Ratio.
     (iii) Redwood Empire shall amend the terms of the Option Plan and obtain any required shareholder approval of such Option Plan amendments and shall amend, as necessary, any and all option agreements (including obtaining any required participant consents) prior to the Effective DateTime to make them consistent with this Section 2.6.

3.     COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES.2.7 Effect on Westamerica Common Stock. At and after the Effective Time, each outstanding share of Westamerica common stock shall remain an outstanding share of Westamerica common stock and shall not be converted or otherwise affected by the Merger.

2.8 Directors of the Surviving Corporation. Immediately after the Effective Time, the Board of Directors of the Surviving Corporation shall be comprised of the persons serving as directors of Westamerica

5


immediately prior to the Effective Time. Such persons shall serve until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.

2.9 Executive Officers of the Surviving Corporation. Immediately after the Effective Time, the executive officers of the Surviving Corporation shall be comprised of the persons serving as executive officers of Westamerica immediately prior to the Effective Time. Such persons shall serve until the earlier of their resignation or termination.

2.10 Directors of the Surviving Bank. Immediately after the Effective Time, the Board of Directors of the Surviving Bank shall be comprised of the persons serving as directors of WAB immediately prior to the Effective Time. Such persons shall serve until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.

3.Covenants of the Parties.

     3.1 Covenants of WABC.Westamerica.

     (a) Reservation, Issuance and Registration of WABCWestamerica Common Stock. WABCWestamerica shall reserve and make available for issuance in connection with the Merger and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement (i) the WABCWestamerica Shares; and (ii) the maximum number of shares of Westamerica common stock of WABC to which the option holders of KSBRedwood Empire may be entitled pursuant to Section 2.6 above at or after the Effective Date. All WABCWestamerica Shares will, when issued and delivered pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. WABCWestamerica shall file and cause to be declared effective pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), one or more registration statements covering all such shares and shall cause all such shares to be issued in compliance with the 1933 Act and in compliance with all applicable state securities laws and regulations. Westamerica shall either: (i) as soon as practicable after the Effective Time, file a registration statement on Form S-3 or Form S-8, as the case may be (or any successor or other appropriate forms), with respect to the shares of Westamerica common stock subject to Redwood Options and use its commercially reasonable best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement or registration statements (and maintain the current status of the prospectus or prospectuses contained therein) for so long as such Redwood Options remain outstanding; or (ii) issue substitute options with substantially the same terms, and having the same economic benefits as the options for which they are issued as substitute options but subject, in the case of directors of Redwood Empire, to the effect of Section 3.2(r), under an existing Westamerica option plan for which Westamerica maintains an effective S-8 registration statement and use its commercially reasonable best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement (and maintain the current status of the prospectus or prospectuses contained therein) for so long as such substitute options remain outstanding.

     (b) Nasdaq Listing. Westamerica shall cause the Westamerica Shares to be issued in the Merger and pursuant to the Redwood Options as provided in Section 2.6 to be approved for listing on the Nasdaq National Market, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the Effective Time.

(c) Government Approvals.Prior to the Effective Date, WABC,Westamerica, with the cooperation of KSB,Redwood Empire, shall use its commercially reasonable best efforts in good faith to take or cause to be taken as promptly as practicable all such steps as shall be necessary to obtain (i) the prior approval of the Merger by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and the Bank Merger Act, as amended, (ii) the DFI under the California Banking LawFinancial Code, and (iii) all other consents and approvals of government agencies as are required by law or otherwise, and shall do any and all acts deemed by WABCWestamerica to be necessary or appropriate in order to cause the Merger and the Bank Merger to be consummated on the terms provided in this Agreement as promptly as practicable. All approvals

5


referred to in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of this Section 3.1(b)3.1(c) are hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Government Approvals.” Westamerica and WAB shall use their commercially reasonable best efforts in good faith to file all applications for the Government Approvals within 45 calendar days after the execution of this Agreement, subject to the availability with reasonable efforts of the required financial and other information, to the cooperation of Redwood Empire and NBR where otherwise

6


necessary for a complete application and to the occurrence of unforeseen circumstances not within Westamerica’s reasonable control that impair Westamerica’s ability (despite the exercise of good faith efforts) to complete and file all such applications within such time, but in such event Westamerica shall nevertheless be obligated to make such filings as promptly as reasonably practicable. Westamerica agrees to use commercially reasonable best efforts to respond within five Business Days to comments or requests, if any, received from bank regulators in connection with any such applications, within ten Business Days to comments or requests, if any, received from the U.S. Department of Justice, and within ten Business Days to comments or requests, if any, received from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), and in each case sooner if reasonably practicable. If it is not reasonably practicable to respond within such times in any instance, Westamerica shall so advise Redwood Empire, which shall not unreasonably withhold, delay or condition its consent to a later filing so long as Westamerica continues to pursue such matters diligently and in a commercially reasonable manner.

     (c)(d) Notification of Breach of Representations, Warranties and Covenants. WABCWestamerica shall promptly (and in any event within two business days)Business Days) give oral and written notice to KSBRedwood Empire upon becoming aware of the occurrence or impending or threatened occurrence of any event which would, or could reasonably be expected to, cause or constitute a breach or inaccuracy of any of the representations or warranties or a breach of any of the representations, warranties or covenants of WABCWestamerica or WAB contained or referred to in the Merger Agreement or this Agreement and shall use its best efforts to prevent the same or remedy the same promptly.

     (d)(e) Financial Statements.

     (i) WABC has delivered or shall make available to KSB prior to the Effective Date true and correct copies of its consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and statements of cash flows for the three month periods ended September 30, 2001, June 30, 2001, March 31, 2001, and any subsequent quarter ends, and for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, and consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2001, June 30, 2001, March 31, 2001, any subsequent quarter ends, and at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999. Such consolidated financial statements at and for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 have been audited by KPMG LLP and its predecessors, independent public accountants (“KPMG”) and include an opinion of such accounting firm to the effect that such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flow of WABC     (i) Westamerica has delivered or has made available to Redwood Empire prior to the Effective Date true and correct copies of (x) all financial statements and proxy statements issued to Westamerica shareholders and/or directors after December 31, 2002 and prior to the date hereof, (y) its consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and statements of cash flows for March 31, 2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and (z) consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2004 and at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. Such consolidated financial statements at and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 have been audited by KPMG LLP and its predecessors, independent public accountants (“KPMG”), and include an opinion of such accounting firm to the effect that such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Westamerica at the dates indicated and for the periods then ending. The opinions of KPMG do not contain any qualifications.

     (ii) Westamerica shall deliver or make available to Redwood Empire at or prior to the Effective Date true and correct copies of (x) all financial statements and proxy statements issued to Westamerica shareholders and/or directors on or after the date hereof and through the Effective Date, (y) its consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and statements of cash flows for all quarters and years ended after March 31, 2004, and (z) consolidated balance sheets for all quarters and years ending after March 31, 2004. Such consolidated financial statements for years ending after March 31, 2004 and prior to the Effective Date shall be audited by KPMG, and shall include an opinion of KPMG to the effect that such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Westamerica at the date indicated and for such period then ending. Such opinion of KPMG do not and shall not contain any qualifications.

     (ii) WABC has provided or shall provide to KSB at or prior to the Effective Date copies of all financial statements and proxy statements issued or to be issued to WABC shareholders and/or directors after December 31, 2001, through the Effective Date.

     (e)(f) Press Releases.WABC Westamerica and WAB shall not issue any press release or written statement for general circulation relating to the Merger, this Agreement or the Merger Agreement unless previously provided to KSBRedwood Empire for review and approval (which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) and shall cooperate with KSBRedwood Empire in the development and distribution of all news releases and other public information disclosures with respect to this Agreement or the Merger; provided that WABCWestamerica may, without the consent of KSB,Redwood Empire, make any disclosure with regard to this Agreement or the Merger that it determines is required under any applicable law or regulation.

     (f)(g) Business Combinations.WABC Prior to the Closing, Westamerica and WAB shall not initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing information or assistance), or take any other action to

7


facilitate, any inquiries or the making of any proposal which constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Business Combination (as such term is defined below), unless such proposal is expressly conditioned upon, or the completion of such Business Combination would not materially interfere with, the performance by Westamerica or its successor in interest of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that the foregoing shall not preclude Westamerica from responding to an unsolicited bona fide written proposal for such a Business Combination from another person. Prior to the Closing, Westamerica and WAB shall not accept any offer from any third party regarding a Business Combination of WABCWestamerica with any other entity unless such offer is expressly conditioned upon the performance by WABC or its successor in interest of its obligations under this Agreement. In the event WABC fails to comply with the provisions of this Section 3.1(f), KSB shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement without any liability to WABC or any agent thereof pursuant to Section 12(b), provided, however, that the obligations and liabilities of WABC set forth in Section 12(e) hereof shall continue in full force and effect. As used in this Agreement, “Business Combination” shall mean any tender or exchange offer, proposal for a merger, consolidation, or other takeover proposal involving any party hereto (except as explicitly contemplated in this Agreement) or any offer or proposal to acquire in any manner a substantial equity interest in, or a substantial portion of any party hereto other than transactions contemplated hereunder.

     (i) such offer is expressly conditioned upon, or the completion of such Business Combination would not materially interfere with, the performance by Westamerica or its successor in interest of its obligations under this Agreement or
     (ii) Westamerica has complied with the first sentence of this Section 3.1(g), Westamerica concludes in good faith (after consultation with a financial advisor of recognized reputation in similar transactions) that the proposed Business Combination constitutes or is reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal (as defined in Section 3.2(j)(iv) but substituting “Westamerica” for “Redwood Empire” in such definition) and the Board of Directors of Westamerica reasonably determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that failure to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law, and Westamerica concurrently terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 11(b)(xii) and pays to Redwood Empire the Termination Fee as provided in Section 11(d).
In the event Westamerica fails to comply with the provisions of this Section 3.1(g), Redwood Empire shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement without any liability to Westamerica or any agent thereof pursuant to Section 11(b);provided, however, that the obligations and liabilities of Westamerica set forth in Section 11(d) hereof shall continue in full force and effect. For purposes of this Section 3.1(g), “Business Combination” shall mean any of the following involving Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries and any person other than Redwood Empire or any of its affiliates: any merger, consolidation, share exchange or other business combination; a sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition of assets of Westamerica or its subsidiaries representing 15% or more of the consolidated assets of Westamerica and its subsidiaries; a sale of shares of capital stock (or securities convertible or exchangeable into or otherwise evidencing, or any agreement or instrument evidencing, the right to acquire capital stock), representing 15% or more of the voting power of Westamerica or its subsidiaries; or a tender offer or exchange offer for at least 15% or more of the outstanding shares of Westamerica; provided, for purposes of clause (ii) of this Section 3.1(g), references to “15% or more” shall be deemed to be references to “a majority.”

     (g)(h) Director and Officer Liability.Indemnification and Liability Insurance Coverage. From and after the Effective Date, the Surviving Corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and provide advancement of defense costs and other expenses to, each person who is now, or has been at any time prior to the date hereof or who becomes prior to the Effective Time, an officer or director of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries (the “Indemnified Persons”) against all losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses, liabilities or judgments or amounts that are paid in settlement of or in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation based in whole or in part on or arising in whole or in part out of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries, and pertaining to any matter existing or occurring, or any acts or omissions occurring, at or prior to the Effective Time, whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the Effective Time (including matters, acts or omissions occurring in connection with the approval of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby), to the same extent such persons are indemnified or have the right to advancement of expenses as of the date of this Agreement by Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to Redwood Empire’s or any such subsidiaries’ Articles of Incorporation or Association, Bylaws and indemnification agreements, if any, in existence on the date hereof with any directors or officers of Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries. Upon the Effective Date, any former KSBRedwood Empire officers who become officers of WABCWestamerica (including any subsidiaries thereof) shall be included in WABC’s DirectorWestamerica’s directors’ and Officerofficers’ insurance policy. Prior to the Effective Date, KSBRedwood Empire may purchase tail insurance coverage

8


under its current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for a term not to exceed three years from the Effective Time with respect to claims arising from facts or events which occurred prior to the Effective Date; provided, however, that the total premium payment for such insurance shall not exceed an amount that is reasonably acceptable to WABC.$75,000. Except as required by applicable law or under the bylaws of Westamerica or WAB, neither WABCWestamerica nor WestamericaWAB will have any further obligation hereunder with respect to the indemnification of any person who now is or hereafter becomes a director or executive officer of KSBRedwood Empire for acts or events occurring before the Effective Date. If the Surviving Corporation or any of its successors or assigns consolidates with or merges into any other person and shall not be the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its properties or assets to any person, then, and in each such case, to the extent necessary, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and assigns of the Surviving Corporation, as the case may be, shall assume the obligations set forth in this Section 3.1(h).

(i) Employee Benefits. For purposes of all Redwood Empire, NBR, Westamerica and WAB employee benefit plans (including vacation policies) under which an employee’s benefit depends, in whole or in part, on length of service, credit will be given to employees of Redwood Empire or its subsidiaries for service previously credited with Redwood Empire or its subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time. Westamerica shall also use its commercially reasonable best efforts to cause each welfare benefit plan of Westamerica or its subsidiaries to waive (i) any preexisting condition restriction that was waived under the terms of any analogous plan of Redwood Empire or its subsidiaries for Redwood Empire employees actually enrolled in such a plan immediately prior to the Effective Time or (ii) any waiting period limitation that would otherwise be applicable to such employee on or after the Effective Time to the extent such employee had satisfied any similar waiting period limitation under an analogous welfare benefit plan of Redwood Empire or its subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time.

6(j) Dividends. After the date of this Agreement, each of Westamerica and Redwood Empire shall coordinate with the other as to the payment of dividends with respect to the Westamerica common stock and the Redwood Empire common stock and the record dates and payment dates relating thereto, it being the intention of the parties hereto that holders of Westamerica common stock and Redwood Empire common stock shall not receive two dividends, or fail to receive one dividend, for any single calendar quarter with respect to their shares of Westamerica common stock and/or Redwood Empire common stock or any shares of Westamerica common stock that any such holder receives in exchange for shares of Redwood Empire common stock in the Merger.

(k) Section 16. Assuming that Redwood Empire delivers to Westamerica the Section 16 Information (as defined below) reasonably in advance of the Effective Time, the Board of Directors of Westamerica, or a committee of non-employee directors thereof (as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 16b-3(d) under the 1934 Act), shall reasonably promptly thereafter and in any event prior to the Effective Time adopt a resolution providing that the receipt by the Redwood Empire Insiders (as defined below) of Westamerica common stock in exchange for shares of Redwood Empire common stock and of options to purchase Westamerica common stock upon conversion of Redwood Options, in each case pursuant to the transactions contemplated hereby and to the extent that such securities are listed in the Section 16 Information provided by Redwood Empire to Westamerica prior to the Effective Time, are intended to be exempt from liability pursuant to Section 16(b) under the 1934 Act such that any such receipt shall be so exempt. “Section 16 Information” shall mean information accurate in all material respects regarding the Redwood Empire Insiders, the number of shares of Redwood Empire common stock held by each of them and the number and description of Redwood Options held by each of them. “Redwood Empire Insiders” shall mean those officers and directors of Redwood Empire who are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act and who are listed in the Section 16 Information.

(l) Tax-Free Reorganization Treatment. Westamerica shall not, and shall not permit any of its subsidiaries to, intentionally take or cause to be taken any action, whether before or after the Effective Time, which would reasonably be expected to disqualify the Merger as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

9


     3.2 Covenants of KSB.Redwood Empire.

     (a) Approval by KSBRedwood Empire Shareholders.KSB Redwood Empire shall cause the Merger, this Agreement and the Merger Agreement to be submitted promptly for the approval of its shareholders at a special meeting to be called and held in accordance with applicable laws. Subject to its continuing fiduciary duty to the shareholders of KSB, the Board of Directors of KSB, in authorizing the execution and delivery of this Agreement by KSB, shall unanimously recommend that this Agreement and the Merger be approved. KSBRedwood Empire shall use its best efforts to cause such meeting of its shareholders to take place not later than 45 daysas promptly as reasonably practicable after the Commission declares the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement effective. In connection with the call of such meeting, KSBRedwood Empire shall cause such proxy materials, with any amendments thereto that may in the judgment of its counsel be necessary or desirable, to set forth each Redwood Empire director’s commitment to vote his or her shares of Redwood Empire stock in favor of the transactions contemplated hereby and to be mailed to its shareholders (the proxy materials, together with any amendments or supplements thereto, being herein referred to as the “Proxy Statement”). Subject to its continuing fiduciary duty to the shareholders of KSB, theThe Board of Directors of KSBRedwood Empire shall at all times prior to and during such meeting of KSBRedwood Empire shareholders recommend that the transactions contemplated hereby, setting forth each director’s commitment to vote his or her shares of KSB stock in favor of the transactions contemplated hereby be adopted and approved and subject to such duty, use its best efforts to cause suchobtain the requisite affirmative vote of the holders of the outstanding Redwood Empire Shares for the approval and adoption of this Agreement and approval.the Merger;provided, however, that the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire may withdraw, modify or change its recommendation to the shareholders if the Board determines, in good faith, following consultation with legal counsel, that failure to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law. Within 15 business30 calendar days after the time of execution and delivery of this Agreement, members of the Board of Directors of KSBRedwood Empire shall deliver to WABCWestamerica undertakings in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B (each a “Director Support and Voting Agreement”) confirming such directors’ approval of the transactions contemplated hereby, setting forth such directors’ commitment to vote his or her shares of KSBRedwood Empire stock in favor of the transactions contemplated herebyby this Agreement and setting forth such directors’ commitment to use his or hertheir best efforts to cause the shareholders of KSBRedwood Empire to adopt and approve the transactions contemplated hereby,by this Agreement, subject to their above-mentioned continuing fiduciary duties to the shareholders of KSBproviso in the immediately preceding sentence and any regulatory constraints. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Redwood Empire shall deliver to Westamerica the undertakings of B. John Barry, Thomas J. Barry, Jessica M. Barry, Michael B. Barry and Cheryl Sandeen in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B-1 (each a “Voting Agreement”) confirming such shareholders’ approval of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and setting forth their respective commitments to vote their shares of Redwood Empire stock in favor of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Except with the prior approval of WABC,Westamerica or pursuant to Section 3.2(j), neither KSBRedwood Empire nor any member of its Board of Directors shall, at the KSBRedwood Empire shareholders’ meeting, submit any other matters for approval of its shareholders.

     (b) Shareholder Lists and Other Information.After execution hereof, KSBRedwood Empire shall from time to time make available to WABC,Westamerica, upon request, a list of its shareholders and their addresses, a list showing all transfers of KSBRedwood Empire common stock and such other information as WABCWestamerica shall reasonably request regarding both the ownership and prior transfers of KSBRedwood Empire common stock.

     (c) Government Approvals.KSB Redwood Empire will cooperate in all reasonable respects with WABCWestamerica and WestamericaWAB in their undertaking to obtain the Government Approvals, and KSBRedwood Empire further agree,agrees, subject to the continuing fiduciary duty of the Board of Directors of KSBRedwood Empire to the shareholders of KSB,Redwood Empire as provided in Section 3.2(a), to take such actions as may be reasonably requested by WABCWestamerica to cause the Merger to be consummated on the terms provided in the Merger Agreement and this Agreement as promptly as is practicable.

     (d) New Branches and Leases.KSB Redwood Empire shall not create any new branches or enter into any acquisitions or leases of real property (except acquisition of real property through foreclosure or in lieu of foreclosure of a security interest), including new leases and lease extensions, without the prior written approval of WABC.Westamerica, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned.

     (e) Notification of Breach of Representations, Warranties and Covenants. KSBRedwood Empire shall promptly (and in any event within two business days)Business Days) give oral and written notice to WABCWestamerica upon becoming aware of the occurrence or impending or threatened occurrence of any event which would, or could reasonably be expected to, cause or constitute a breach or inaccuracy of any of the representations or

10


warranties or a breach of any of the representations, warranties or covenants of KSBRedwood Empire or NBR contained or referred to in this Agreement and shall each use its best efforts to prevent the same or remedy the same promptly.

     (f) Financial Statements.

     (i) KSB has delivered or shall deliver to WABC prior to the Effective Date true and correct copies of its consolidated statements of income for the three month periods ended September 30, 2001, June 30, 2001, March 31, 2001, and any subsequent quarter ends, and consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2001, June 30, 2001, March 31, 2001, and any subsequent quarter ends and at December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996. Such consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996
     (i) Redwood Empire has delivered or has made available to Westamerica prior to the Effective Date true and correct copies of (x) all financial statements and proxy statements issued to Redwood Empire shareholders and/or directors after December 31, 2003 and prior to the date hereof, (y) its consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and statements of cash flows for March 31, 2004, and or the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and (z) consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2004 and at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. Such consolidated financial statements at and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 have been audited by Crowe Chizek and Company LLC, independent public accountants (“Crowe Chizek”), and include an opinion of such accounting firm to the effect that such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Redwood Empire at the dates indicated and for the periods then ending. The opinions of Crowe Chizek do not contain any qualifications.

     (ii) Redwood Empire shall deliver or make available to Westamerica at or prior to the Effective Date true and correct copies of (x) all financial statements and proxy statements issued to Redwood Empire shareholders and/or directors on or after the date hereof and through the Effective Date, (y) its consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and statements of cash flows for all quarters and years ending after March 31, 2004, and (z) consolidated balance sheets for all quarters and years ending after March 31, 2004. Such consolidated financial statements for years ending after March 31, 2004, shall be audited by Crowe Chizek, and shall include an opinion of Crowe Chizek to the effect that such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Redwood Empire at the date indicated and for such period then ending. Such opinion of Crowe Chizek shall not contain any qualifications.

     (iii) Redwood Empire shall deliver to Westamerica copies of all annual management letters and opinions, and shall make available to Westamerica for inspection all reviews, correspondence and other documents in the files of Redwood Empire, prepared by Crowe Chizek or any other certified public accountant engaged by Redwood Empire and delivered to Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries since January 1, 2001.

     (iv) Redwood Empire has delivered or shall deliver to Westamerica true and complete copies of Redwood Empire’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999, all proxy statements and other written material furnished to Redwood Empire’s shareholders since December 31, 1999, and all other material reports, including call reports, relating to Redwood Empire filed by Redwood Empire or NBR with the FRB, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) or Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), during 1999 through 2003 and in 2004 prior to the Effective Date. As of their respective dates, each of the documents described in the preceding sentence complied or shall comply in all material respects with all legal and regulatory requirements applicable thereto.

     (v) To confirm satisfaction of the conditions in Section 7(o) and (p), at least two Business Days before the Closing Date or, if applicable, such earlier date specified in clause (ii) of the final paragraph of Article 7, Redwood Empire shall provide to Westamerica a certificate of its chief financial officer as to Redwood Empire’s Shareholders’ Equity, loans and deposits, and allowance for loan losses and written assurance of Redwood Empire’s independent accountants under, or consistent with the standards of, SAS 100 to the effect that the accountants are not aware that the financial statements of Redwood Empire as of the latest practicable date preceding the Effective Time or, if applicable, the earlier date described in clause (ii) of the final paragraph of Article 7 (the “SAS 100 Date”) from which Shareholders’ Equity is determined for purposes of Section 7(o) and (p) require any material modifications in order to comply with GAAP. Westamerica shall be permitted reasonable review and inquiry with respect to the calculation of Shareholders’ Equity and the supporting certificate.

11


and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996 have been or shall be audited by Moss-Adams, LLP, and, in each case as independent public accountants for KSB during the relevant periods, and include or shall include an opinion of Moss Adams to the effect that such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of KSB at the dates indicated and for the periods then ending. The opinions of Moss Adams do not and shall not contain any qualifications.
     (ii) KSB shall provide to WABC, at or prior to the Effective Date, copies of all financial statements and proxy statements issued or to be issued to KSB’s shareholders and/or directors after December 31, 2001, and through the Effective Date.
     (iii) KSB has delivered or shall deliver to WABC true and complete copies of KSB’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, and 1996, all proxy statements and other written material furnished to KSB’s shareholders since December 31, 1995, and all other material reports, including call reports, relating to KSB filed by KSB with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), the DFI, during 1996 through 2001 and in 2002 prior to the Effective Date. As of their respective dates, each of the documents described in the preceding sentence complied or shall comply in all material respects with all legal and regulatory requirements applicable thereto.
     (iv) To confirm satisfaction of the conditions in Section 7(o), a reasonable period before Closing KSB shall provide to WABC a certificate of its chief financial officer as to KSB’s shareholders’ equity, loans, deposits, and allowance for loan losses and written assurance of KSB’s independent accountants under, or consistent with the standards of, SAS 71 to the effect that the accountants are not aware that the financial statements of KSB as of the most recent month end preceding the Effective Time by at least 28 days (the “SAS 71 Date”) from which shareholders’ equity is determined for purposes of Section 7(o) require any material modifications in order to comply with GAAP. WABC shall be permitted reasonable review and inquiry with respect to the calculation of shareholders’ equity and the supporting certificate and accountant’s assurance.

     (vi) Redwood Empire will maintain internal controls over financial reporting (as required by Rule 13a-15(f) under the 1934 Act). Redwood Empire will provide Westamerica with an assessment of such internal controls, cooperate with Westamerica in assessing the effectiveness of such internal controls and identify to Westamerica the framework used to evaluate the effectiveness of such internal controls.

     (g) Compensation.KSB shall not make or approve The Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule discloses the name of the recipient and amount of any increase in theseverance compensation payableowed or to become payablebe paid by KSB toRedwood Empire or any of its directors, officers,subsidiaries or any of their successors in connection with completion of the Merger. Except as disclosed in the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, Redwood Empire shall stay within its 2004 compensation budget, shall operate in a manner consistent with past practices for June salary increases and shall provide to Westamerica a schedule setting forth those individuals with base salaries over $40,000 for whom increases in compensation have been approved, their current compensation and amounts of approved increases. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing provisions, Redwood Empire shall be entitled to pay (i) the Core Bank Incentive Bonuses to its employees, or agentsprorated for the portion of the fiscal year 2004 which shall have elapsed to the Effective Date, as disclosed in Section 3(g) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule to the extent that such bonuses are within Redwood Empire’s 2004 compensation budget, are consistent with annual salaries in excessthe terms of $40,000its Core Bank Incentive Plan and have been accrued prior to or at the date hereoftime of payment on the financial statements of Redwood Empire (except that general retention pool amounts shall be paid only after Redwood Empire has advised Westamerica of the proposed recipients), (ii) those bonuses to executive officers under the Executive Officer Bonus Program, prorated for the portion of the fiscal year 2004 which shall have elapsed to the Effective Date, as disclosed in Section 3(g) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, and (iii) those retention payment amounts disclosed in the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule. Redwood Empire will continue to accrue on its financial statements on a monthly basis for the expense of amounts that will be payable to employees of Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries after Closing (which amounts Westamerica shall cause to be paid when due) under its Commercial Loan Officer 2004 Commission Plan, 2004 Business Development Officer Commission Plan and RMS 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan. Redwood Empire will not adjust base salaries or award other forms of compensation (including but not limited to compensation through any profit sharing, pension, retirement, severance, incentive or other employee benefit program or arrangement), nor shall any bonus payment or any agreement or commitment to make a bonus payment be made, nor shall any stock option, warrant oremployees other rightthan pursuant to acquire capital stock be granted, or employment agreement (other than any such employment agreement that may arise by operation of law upon the hiring of any new employee) or consulting agreement be entered into by KSB with any such directors, officers, employees or agents unless WABC has given itsJune 2004 compensation adjustment without the prior written consent whichof Westamerica (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Nothing herein shall prevent the payment to employees of KSB (with salaries of $40,000withheld, delayed or less at the date hereof) of regular salary increases, consistent with past practices in connection with regular salary reviews, as heretofore disclosed to WABC.conditioned). Without the prior consent of WABC,Westamerica, which WABCWestamerica shall not unreasonably withhold, KSBdelay or condition, Redwood Empire shall not hire any new employee.

     (h) Conduct of Business in the Ordinary Course.Prior to the Effective Time:

      (i) KSBExcept as provided otherwise in this Agreement, Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries shall conduct its businesstheir respective businesses in the ordinary course as heretofore conducted. For purposes of this Agreement, the “Ordinary Course of Business” shall consist of the banking and related businesses as presently conducted by KSBRedwood Empire and its subsidiaries and permitted under the BHCA, Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDI Act”), National Bank Act and other applicable laws. Unless WABCWestamerica has given its previousprior written consent to any act or omission to the contrary KSB(which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries shall, through the Effective Date, cause its officers to:

      (A)use their commercially reasonable best efforts to preserve its business and business organizations intact;
 
      (B)use their commercially reasonable best efforts to preserve the goodwill of customers and others having business relations with KSBRedwood Empire and take no action that would impair the benefit to WABCWestamerica of the goodwill of KSBRedwood Empire and NBR or the other benefits of the Merger;Mergers;

8


      (C)consult with WABCWestamerica as to the making of any decisions or the taking of any actions in matters other than in the Ordinary Course of Business;

12


      (D)maintain its properties in customary repair, working order and condition (reasonable wear and tear excepted);
 
      (E)comply with all laws, regulations and decrees applicable to the conduct of its respective business;their businesses;
 
      (F)keep in force at not less than its present limits all policies of insurance (including deposit insurance of the FDIC) to the extent reasonably practicable in light of the prevailing market conditions in the insurance industry;
 
      (G)use itstheir commercially reasonable best efforts, subject to Section 3.2(g), to keep available to WABCWestamerica the services of its present officers and employees (it being understood that KSBRedwood Empire or NBR shall have the right to terminate the employment of any officer or employee in accordance with its establishedcustomary employment procedures);
 
      (H)comply with all orders, agreements and memoranda of understanding made by or with the FRB, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the “FRBSF”), the FDIC,OCC, the DFIFDIC or any other regulatory authority of competent jurisdiction, and promptly (and in any event within two business days)Business Days) forward to WABCWestamerica all communications received from or sent by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries to any such authority that are not prohibited by such authority from being so disclosed and inform WABCWestamerica of any material restrictions imposed by any governmental authority on the business of KSB;Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries;
 
      (I)file in a timely manner (taking into account any extensions duly obtained) all reports, tax returns and other documents required to be filed with federal, state, local and other authorities;
 
      (J)conduct a Phase I environmental audit prior to foreclosure on any property and provide the results of such audit to and consult with WABCWestamerica regarding the significance of the audit prior to the foreclosure on any such property;
 
      (K)not sell, lease, pledge, assign, encumber or otherwise dispose of any of its respective assets except in the Ordinary Course of Business, for adequate value, without recourse and consistent with its customary practice;
 
      (L)with respect to any extension of credit in excess of $10,000, not waive or release any right or collateral or cancel or compromise any debt or claim, except in the Ordinary Course of Business;
 
      (M)not make, renegotiate, renew, increase, extend or purchase any loans, advances or loan commitments, in each case to any of its respective officers, directors or any affiliated or related persons of such directors or officers except in the Ordinary Course of Business consistent with established loan procedures and in compliance with FRB Regulation O and the California Banking Law;O;
 
      (N)not take any action to create, relocate or terminate the operations of any banking office or branch, or to form any new subsidiary or affiliated entity;
 
      (O)not settle or otherwise take any action to release or reduce any of its respective rights with respect to any litigation involving a claim of more than $10,000 in which it is a party; and
 
      (P)consult with WABCWestamerica on problem loan workout strategies,strategies.

     (ii) Redwood Empire and obtain WABC’s concurrence onNBR shall not, without first having obtained the written consent of Westamerica (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), cause or permit the officers of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries to:

(A) commit to any loan lossor extension of credit or any renewal of any outstanding credit in excess of $25,000 or any writedown of other real estate owned;$500,000, provided that WABC’sWestamerica’s consent shall be deemed given unless it objects and states the basis of its objection in writing, or verbally with prompt written confirmation, within five business daysone Business Day after receipt of written notice directed to authorized WABCWestamerica personnel, together with sufficient supporting information to allow WABCWestamerica to make an informed judgment, and WABC shall not unreasonably withhold consent; provided, further, that any consent given by WABC shall be binding only is given by authorized WABC personnel identified on a list signed by WABC’s President;

9


     (ii) KSB shall not, without first having obtained the written consent of WABC, cause the officers of KSB to:

(A)commit to any loan or extension of credit in excess of $100,000, provided that WABC’s consent shall be deemed given unless it objects and states the basis of its objection in writing, or verbally with prompt written confirmation, within two business days after receipt of written notice directed to authorized WABC personnel, together with sufficient supporting information to allow WABC to make an informed judgment, and WABCWestamerica shall not unreasonably withhold its consent; provided, further, that any consent given by WABCWestamerica shall be binding only if given by authorized WABCWestamerica personnel identified on a

13


list signed by WABC’s President;Westamerica’s President and delivered to Redwood Empire concurrently with the execution of this Agreement or as later modified by Westamerica; provided, however, as long as those new credits or renewals conform to Redwood Empire’s existing underwriting standards and applicable regulatory standards and are not classified or criticized, such extensions of credit or renewals shall be approved by Westamerica (or consent deemed given within one Business Day in the absence of written objection); provided further, however, Redwood Empire shall be permitted (without obtaining Westamerica’s prior consent) to change interest rates charged on any outstanding credit or on categories of outstanding or new credits so long as such changes in interest rates maintain or exceed preexisting spreads to market interest rates;
(B) materially change the characteristics of its loan portfolio, including loan types, interest rates (except to maintain or exceed preexisting spreads to market interest rates), terms, duration and other terms offered;
 
      (B)(C) purchase any investment security with a maturity in excess of one year,two years or that would result in a lengthening of the overall duration of its investment portfolio, or sell any investment security in which a gain is recognized;
 
      (C)(D) issueaccept any certificate of depositdeposits with a rate of interest in excess of the rate paid on similar accounts of comparable maturity by WestamericaWAB plus 15five basis points or materially change the characteristics of its deposit portfolio, including deposit types, interest rates and terms offered, provided that WABCWestamerica shall not withhold its consent to a request for an exception to this restriction if the request is based on a reasonable business purpose consistent with existing operations of KSB;Redwood Empire;
 
      (D)(E) commit to any new capital commitments or expenditures in excess of $25,000 for any individual item or $50,000 in the aggregate;aggregate other than commitments or expenditures disclosed in Section 4(o) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule;
 
      (E)(F) commit to any new contract or extend any existing contract (including, but not limited to, data processing or servicing but excluding agreements to extend credit) that would obligate KSBit for an aggregate amount over time in excess of $25,000;$25,000 for any individual contract or $50,000 in the aggregate; provided that Westamerica’s consent shall be deemed given unless it objects and states the basis of its objection in writing, or verbally with prompt written confirmation, within two Business Days after receipt of written notice directed to authorized Westamerica personnel, together with sufficient supporting information to allow Westamerica to make an informed judgment;
 
      (F)(G) accelerate the vesting of pension or other benefits except as contractually obligated as of the date hereof; or
 
      (G)(H) except as for properties specified in Section 3(h)(ii)(H) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, knowingly acquire, own, possess or have a collateral or contingent interest or purchase option in any properties or other assets which contain or have located within or thereon any hazardous or toxic waste material or substance unless the location of such hazardous or toxic waste material or other substance or its use thereon conforms in all respects with all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations or other provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment.

     (i) Press Releases.KSB Redwood Empire and NBR shall not issue any press release or written statement for general circulation relating to this Agreement or the Merger unless previously provided to WABCWestamerica for review and approval (which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) and shall cooperate with WABCWestamerica in the development and distribution of all news releases and other public information disclosures with respect to this Agreement or the Merger; provided that KSBRedwood Empire may, without the consent of WABC,Westamerica, make any disclosure with regard to this Agreement or the Merger that it determines is required under any applicable law or regulation.

     (j) No Merger or Solicitation.

     (i) Subject to the continuing fiduciary duty of the Board of Directors of KSB to the shareholders of KSB, prior to the Effective Time, KSB shall not effect or agree to effect any Business Combination, acquire or agree to acquire any of its own capital stock or the capital stock (except in a fiduciary capacity) or assets (except in the Ordinary Course of Business or except pursuant to its Simplified Employee Pension plan as consistent with past practice)     (i) Redwood Empire and NBR shall not initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing information or assistance), or take any other action to facilitate, any inquiries or the making of any other entity, or commence any proceedings for winding up and dissolution affecting either of them.
     (ii) Subject to the continuing fiduciary duty of the Board of Directors of KSB to the shareholders of KSB, prior to the Effective Date, neither KSB nor any officer, director or affiliate of KSB, nor any investment banker, attorney, accountant or other agent, advisor or representative retained by KSB shall (A) solicit or encourage, directly or indirectly, any inquiries, discussions or proposals for, continue, propose or enter into discussions or negotiations looking toward, or enter into any agreement or understanding providing for, any Business Combination; or (B) disclose, directly

1014


or indirectly, any nonpublic information to any corporation, partnership, person or other entity or group, other than federal or state bank or security regulatory authorities, or, consultants, advisors, or agents of KSB who need to know such information and who are subject to comparable confidentiality provisions, concerning the business and properties of KSB or afford any such party access to the properties, books or records of KSB or otherwise assist or encourage any such party in connection with the foregoing, or (C) furnish or cause to be furnished any information concerning the business, financial condition, operations, properties or prospects of KSB to another person having any actual or prospective role with respect to any such transaction.
     (iii) KSB shall notify WABC immediately of the details of any indication of interest of any person, corporation, firm, association or group to acquire by any means a controlling interest in KSB or engage in any Business Combination with KSB.
     (iv) In the event the Board of Directors of KSB receives a bona fide offer for a Business Combination of KSB with another entity, and reasonably determines, upon advice of counsel, that as a result of such offer, any duty to act or to refrain from doing any act pursuant to this Agreement is inconsistent with the continuing fiduciary duties of said Board of Directors to the shareholders of KSB, such failure to act or refrain from doing any act shall not constitute the failure of any condition, breach of any covenant or otherwise constitute any breach of this Agreement, provided, however, that any such failure to act or refrain from doing any act shall entitle WABC to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 12(b); and provided further, that the obligations and liabilities of KSB set forth in Section 12(e) hereof shall continue in full force and effect.

proposal which constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Competing Transaction (as such term is defined below), or negotiate or have any discussions with any person in furtherance of such inquiries or to obtain a Competing Transaction, or agree to or endorse any Competing Transaction, or approve or recommend, or propose to approve or recommend, or execute or enter into, any letter of intent, agreement in principle, merger agreement, asset purchase or share exchange or issuance agreement, option agreement, or other similar agreement related to any Competing Transaction or propose or agree to do any of the foregoing, or authorize any of Redwood Empire’s or any of its subsidiaries’ officers, directors or employees or any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney, accountant or any other representative retained by it or any of its affiliates (the “Representatives”) to take any such action, and will cause the Representatives and the Redwood Empire subsidiaries not to take any such action, and Redwood Empire shall promptly (within 24 hours) notify Westamerica (orally and in writing) of all of the relevant details relating to all inquiries and proposals which it may receive relating to any of such matters, including the identity of the offeror or person making the request or inquiry. For purposes of this Agreement, “Competing Transaction” shall mean any of the following involving Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries and any person other than Westamerica or any of its affiliates: any merger, consolidation, share exchange or other business combination; a sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition of assets of Redwood Empire or its subsidiaries representing 15% or more of the consolidated assets of Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries; a sale of shares of capital stock (or securities convertible or exchangeable into or otherwise evidencing, or any agreement or instrument evidencing, the right to acquire capital stock), representing 15% or more of the voting power of Redwood Empire or its subsidiaries; or a tender offer or exchange offer for at least 15% of the outstanding shares of Redwood Empire.

     (ii) Redwood Empire shall notify Westamerica (orally and in writing) within 24 hours of the receipt of any such inquiries, proposals or offers, the request for any such information, or the initiation or continuation of any such negotiations or discussions which are sought to be initiated or continued with Redwood Empire.

     (iii) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Section 3.2(j) or any other provision of this Agreement, prior to the duly convened Redwood Empire shareholders’ meeting upon which the Merger shall be voted, and subject to compliance with the other terms of this Section 3.2(j) and to first entering into a confidentiality agreement having provisions that are no less favorable to Redwood Empire than those contained in that certain Confidentiality Agreement dated April 27, 2004, between Redwood Empire and Westamerica (the “Confidentiality Agreement”), the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire shall be permitted to engage in discussions or negotiations with, and provide nonpublic information or data to, any person in response to an unsolicited bona fide written proposal for a Competing Transaction by such person first made after the date hereof which the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire concludes in good faith (after consultation with a financial advisor of recognized reputation in similar transactions) constitutes or is reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal (as defined below), and to recommend such Superior Proposal to the holders of Redwood Empire common stock, if and only to the extent that, the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire reasonably determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that failure to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law; provided, that Redwood Empire shall have given Westamerica (orally and in writing) at least 48 hours prior notice of its intent to do so before taking the first of any such actions with any one such person; provided, further, that Redwood Empire and the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire shall keep Westamerica informed of the status and terms of any such proposals, offers, discussions or negotiations on a prompt basis, including by providing a copy of all material documentation or correspondence relating thereto. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Section 3.2(j) or any other provision of this Agreement, Redwood Empire may waive any provision of any confidentiality agreement entered into as provided above if the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties under applicable law, reasonably determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law and Redwood Empire also contemporaneously waives similar provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement.

     (iv) For purposes of this Agreement, “Superior Proposal” shall mean a bona fide written proposal for a Competing Transaction which the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire concludes in good faith, after

15


consultation with a financial advisor of recognized reputation in similar transactions and its legal advisors, taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of the proposal and the person making the proposal (y) is more favorable to Redwood Empire’s shareholders from a financial point of view than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and (z) is fully financed or reasonably capable of being fully financed, reasonably likely to receive all required governmental approvals on a timely basis and otherwise reasonably capable of being completed on the terms proposed; provided that, for purposes of this definition of “Superior Proposal”, the term Competing Transaction shall have the meaning assigned to such term in this Section 3.2(j), except that the reference to “15% or more” in the definition of Competing Transaction shall be deemed to be a reference to “a majority”. Nothing in this Section 3.2(j) shall prohibit Redwood Empire or its Board of Directors from taking and disclosing to the Redwood Empire shareholders a position with respect to a Competing Transaction to the extent required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) or the rules and regulations thereunder, or from making such disclosure to the Redwood Empire shareholders which, after consultation with outside legal counsel, the Board determines is otherwise required under applicable law; provided, that taking any such action required to comply with any such obligations shall not in any way limit or modify the effect that any action so taken has under any other provision of this Agreement, including, without limitation, Section 11(b)(ix).

     (k) Employee Benefit Plans.KSB Redwood Empire agrees that any of its employee benefit plans shall, at the request of WABC,Westamerica, be terminated, frozen, modified or merged into the corresponding employee benefit plan of WABCWestamerica, immediately before, on or after the Effective Date (but conditioned as to its effectiveness on actual completion of the Merger), as determined by WABCWestamerica in its sole discretion and to the extent permitted by such plan without violating the rights of employees.

     (l) Changes in Capital Stock.At or after the date hereof and at or prior to the Effective Time, except with the prior written consent of WABC, KSBWestamerica, Redwood Empire shall not amend its Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; make any change in its authorized, issued or outstanding capital stock or any other equity security; issue, sell, pledge, assign or otherwise encumber or dispose of, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, any of its stock or other equity securities or enter into any agreement, call or commitment of any character so to do; grant, issue, or accelerate of the vesting of any stock option relating to, right to acquire, or security convertible into, shares of its capital stock or other equity security; purchase, redeem, retire or otherwise acquire (other than in a fiduciary capacity) any shares of, or any security convertible into, its capital stock or other equity security, or agree to do any of the foregoing, or permit any of its subsidiaries to do any of the foregoing, except that nothing herein shall prohibit the issuance of shares pursuant to the Option Plan with respect to options outstanding at the date of this Agreement (except as limited(as provided for in Section 2.6).

     (m) Dividends. KSBExcept for quarterly dividends not exceeding $0.21 per share and otherwise consistent with past practice and the provisions of Section 3.1(j), Redwood Empire shall not declare, set aside, or pay any dividend or other distribution in respect of its common stock (including, without limitation, any stock dividend or distribution).

     (n) Accounting Methods. KSBRedwood Empire shall not change its methods of accounting in effect at December 31, 2000,2003, except as required by changes in GAAP as concurred in by its independent auditors or as required by this Agreement.

     (o) Affiliates. At least 40 days priorthe time of mailing of the Proxy Statement to the Effective Date, KSBshareholders of Redwood Empire, Redwood Empire shall deliver to WABCWestamerica a letter identifying all persons who are, at the time this Agreement is submitted for approval to the shareholders of KSB,Redwood Empire, “affiliates” of KSBRedwood Empire for purposes of Rule 145 under the 1933 Act. KSBRedwood Empire shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to cause each person named in the letter delivered by it to deliver to WABC prior toWestamerica within 30 days after the Effective Date,date of this Agreement, or as soon thereafter as such persons are identified, a written “affiliates” agreement, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, providing that such person shall dispose of the WABC Common StockWestamerica common stock to be received by such person in the Merger only in accordance with applicable law.

     (p) Additional Agreements. In case at any time after the Effective Time any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of this Agreement or to vest the Surviving Corporation with

1116


full title to all properties, assets, rights, approvals, immunities and franchises of KSB,Redwood Empire, the proper officers and directors of each party to this Agreement shall take all such necessary or appropriate action.

     (q) Access to Properties, Books and Records; Confidentiality. Prior to the Effective Time, KSBsubject to the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement, Redwood Empire shall give WABCWestamerica and its counsel and accountants full access, during normal business hours and upon reasonable request, to all of its and its subsidiaries’ properties, books, contracts, commitments and records including, but not limited to, the corporate, financial and operational records, papers, reports, instructions, procedures, tax returns and filings, tax settlement letters, material contracts or commitments, regulatory examinations and correspondence and shall allow WABCWestamerica to make copies of such materials (to the extent not legally prohibited) and shall furnish WABCWestamerica with all such information concerning its affairs as WABCWestamerica may reasonably request. KSBrequest; provided, however, that Redwood Empire is not required to provide any information if such provision would cause a loss of the attorney-client privilege enjoyed by Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries. Redwood Empire shall also use its commercially reasonable best efforts to cause Moss AdamsCrowe Chizek to make available to WABC,Westamerica, its accountants, counsel and other agents, to the extent reasonably requested in connection with such review, Moss Adams’sCrowe Chizek’s work papers and documentation relating to its audits of the books and records of KSB.Redwood Empire.

     (r) NoncompetitionNoncompetition/Nonsolicitation Agreements. KSBRedwood Empire shall use its best efforts to have each director of KSBRedwood Empire execute a noncompetition agreement substantiallyConfidentiality and Nonsolicitation Agreement in the form of Exhibit D (“Confidentiality and Nonsolicitation Agreement”), or a Noncompetition Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D.D-1 (“Noncompetition Agreement”), pursuant to which each director shall agree to certain nonsolicitation covenants and either (i) to refrain from certain activities in competition with Westamerica and WAB or (ii) to exercise any options to acquire shares of Redwood Empire common stock that are converted in the Merger to options to acquire shares of Westamerica common stock within 90 days after the Effective Date or to consent to the termination of such options upon the conclusion of such period.

     (s) Classifications and Litigation Developments. KSBRedwood Empire agrees to promptly (and in any event within two business days)Business Days) advise WABCWestamerica in writing of (i) all other real estate owned (“OREO”), loans, leases, other extensions of credit or commitments, or other interest-bearing assets of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries that have been classified subsequent to the date hereof by any internal bank examiner or any bank regulatory agency as “Other Loans Especially Mentioned”, “Substandard”, “Doubtful”, “Loss”, or words of similar import in the case of loans (or that would have been so classified, in the case of other assets, had they been loans) and (ii) the classification of any loan as substandard, doubtful or loss, the filing or threatened filing of any and all legal actions or other proceedings or investigations which if determined adversely to KSBRedwood Empire are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or, results of operations of KSB taken as a whole,Redwood Empire, compliance with its obligations under this Agreement or the satisfaction of any condition to closing under this Agreement, and any significant developments arising in connection with said actions, proceedings or investigations. Notwithstanding the above, Redwood Empire shall be under no obligation to disclose to Westamerica any such classification by any bank regulatory agency where such disclosure would violate any obligation of confidentiality of Redwood Empire imposed by such bank regulatory agency.

     (t) Accounting Adjustment before Closing. KSBRedwood Empire agrees to make such accounting adjustments as WABCWestamerica shall reasonably request immediately before Closing to conform KSB’sRedwood Empire’s accounting to WABC’sWestamerica’s accounting and methodology for determining its allowance for loan losses, provided that any such adjustment shall be disregarded for purposes of Section 7(o).

(u) Consents. Where required by law or by agreements with third parties, Redwood Empire shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain from third parties, prior to the Effective Date, all consents to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, where failure to obtain such consents would or would reasonably be expected to have noa material adverse effect on Redwood Empire or Westamerica or that will or would reasonably be expected to prevent Westamerica from realizing any substantial portion of the consideration paideconomic benefits of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

17


(v) Cash Reconciliation. At the close of business on the last Business Day before the Effective Time, Redwood Empire shall conduct a cash reconciliation at its branches and shall permit Westamerica to KSB shareholdersobserve or participate in such reconciliation.

(w) Tax Returns. Redwood Empire shall deliver to Westamerica copies of all its and its subsidiaries’ tax returns with respect to taxes payable to the Merger.United States of America and the State of California for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 (when available), 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999.

     3.3 Covenants of the Parties.Information and Confidentiality.

     (a) Information and Confidentiality. Each party shall use its best efforts to cause its officers, directors, employees, auditors, agents, and attorneys to cooperate with the other in the reasonable requests for information by the other parties hereto. Each party shall treat as confidential all such information in the same manner as each party treats similar confidential information of its own, and if this Agreement is terminated, each party shall continue to treat all such information as confidential and to cause its employees to keep all such information confidential and shall return such documents theretofore delivered by any other party as such other party shall request, and shall use such information, or cause it to be used, solely for the purposes of evaluating and completing the transactions contemplated hereby; provided that each party may disclose any such information to the extent required by federal or state securities laws or otherwise required by any governmental agency or authority, or by GAAP. The foregoing confidentiality obligations shall not apply in respect of any information publicly available or to any information previously known to the party in question, the use of which is not otherwise restricted.

     (b) Asset Review.

     (i) Redwood Empire shall continue to engage its internal asset review examiners to identify potential losses with respect to loans, leases and OREO. Redwood Empire shall have reviewed all nonperforming assets and other classified or criticized assets as of a date within three months preceding the Effective Date and all loans of $250,000 or more up to $500,000 originated after the date of this Agreement. Redwood Empire shall promptly provide a copy of reports of such reviews to Westamerica. All loans, leases or OREO of Redwood Empire may be reviewed by Westamerica as part of its ongoing due diligence and Westamerica may provide a report thereon to Redwood Empire setting forth Westamerica’s grading or other assessment thereof (including accounting treatment and loss recognition).

     (ii) Redwood Empire may accept and implement Westamerica’s grading or other assessments (including accounting treatment and loss recognition) concerning loans, leases or OREO. In case of any dispute between Westamerica and Redwood Empire with respect to classification or grading of loans, the amount of reserve appropriate for a classified loan or the adequacy of Redwood Empire’s allowance for loan losses in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, Westamerica and Redwood Empire shall use their best efforts to resolve such dispute. If they do not resolve the dispute, Redwood Empire and Westamerica shall refer the matter for resolution by a mutually agreed (after mutual full disclosure of existing and prior relationships with each party) third party experienced in reviewing loans and loan portfolios (the “Independent Loan Reviewer”) or, in the case of OREO, a mutually agreed (after mutual full disclosure of existing and prior relationships with each party) third party experienced in appraising properties of the kind in question (the “Independent Appraiser”).

     (iii) The Independent Loan Reviewer or Independent Appraiser shall immediately review and/or appraise said loan(s) or OREO utilizing GAAP, applicable regulatory accounting principles (“RAP”) and related standards as enforced by the FRB. If the Independent Loan Reviewer believes it necessary to retain an Independent Appraiser, Westamerica and Redwood Empire shall mutually agree on the Independent Appraiser.

     (iv) Redwood Empire agrees to recognize on its books and records all additional loan provisions and loan losses and record all OREO at their net realizable value (and record related OREO expenses) based on the review/appraisal by the Independent Loan Reviewer or Independent Appraiser no later than the last day of month in which the determination is made. With respect to any OREO, based on all known information available from time to time, if it appears that Redwood Empire’s then current independent appraisals may not

18


be accurate or upon request of and at the expense of Westamerica, Redwood Empire shall promptly obtain updated independent appraisals by an Independent Appraiser and provide copies of all such appraisals to Westamerica. Any new or additional write-downs or OREO expenses shall be recorded immediately upon receiving any updated independent appraisal. Westamerica and Redwood Empire agree to accept the views of the Independent Loan Reviewer and Independent Appraiser with respect to loan grades, loan provisions, collateral and OREO values and related matters under this section. When this method results in a determination that a loan or asset should have a reserve amount or an additional reserve amount associated with it, the reserve shall be created by an addition to the allowance for loan losses and not by a reallocation of amounts in the existing allowance, except to the extent that the allowance and each portion of the allowance, including the unallocated portion, are justified under GAAP applied on a consistent basis both before and after any such reallocation. The parties agree that adjustments made under this section shall be deemed consistent with GAAP. With respect to any asset the value of which is in dispute, Westamerica shall consent to a sale by Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries of such asset to a director or shareholder of Redwood Empire at the higher of the appraised value established by this review process or the minimum price required by applicable law, or such higher price as Redwood Empire and the buyer may agree.

     (v) Except as provided otherwise above, Redwood Empire and Westamerica shall each pay one half of all fees and expenses of the Independent Loan Reviewer and any Independent Appraiser.

3.4 Cooperation. All parties to this Agreement shall cooperate with each other and use their commercially reasonable best efforts to promptly prepare and file all necessary documentation, to effect all applications, notices, petitions and filings, and to obtain as promptly as practicable all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all third parties that are necessary or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The parties shall confer on a regular basis, report on operational matters, policies and banking practices and promptly advise the other orally and in writing of any change or event that has caused or could reasonably be expected to cause or constitute a material failure of a condition in this Agreement.

4.     (i) KSB shall continue to engage its internal asset review examiners to identify potential losses with respect to loansRepresentations and other assets. KSB shall have reviewed all nonperforming assetsWarranties of Redwood Empire and other classified or criticized assets as of a date within three months preceding the Effective Date. KSB shall promptly provide a copy of reports of such reviews to WABC. All assets of KSB may be reviewed by WABC as part of its ongoing due diligence and WABC may provide a report thereon to KSB setting forth WABC’s grading or other assessment thereof (including accounting treatment and loss recognition).
     (ii) KSB may accept and implement WABC’s grading or other assessments (including accounting treatment and loss recognition) concerning loans or OREO. In case of any dispute between WABC and KSB with respect to classification or grading of loans, the amount of reserve appropriate for a classifiedNBR.

12


loan or the adequacy of KSB’s allowance for loan losses in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, WABC and KSB shall use their best efforts to resolve such dispute. If they do not resolve the dispute, KSB and WABC shall refer the matter for resolution by a mutually agreed third party experienced in reviewing loans and loan portfolios (the “Independent Loan Reviewer”).
     (iii) The Independent Loan Reviewer shall immediately review and/or appraise said loan(s) or OREO utilizing GAAP, applicable regulatory accounting principles (“RAP”) and related standards as enforced by the FRB. If the Independent Loan Reviewer believes it necessary to retain an independent appraiser, WABC and KSB shall mutually agree on a qualified third party experienced in appraising properties of the kind in question (the “Independent Appraiser”).
     (iv) KSB agrees to recognize on its books and records all additional loan provisions and loan losses and record all OREO at their net realizable value (and record related OREO expenses) based on the review/appraisal by the Independent Loan Reviewer or Independent Appraiser no later than the last day of month in which the determination is made. With respect to any OREO, based on all known information available from time to time, if it appears that KSB’s then current independent appraisals may not be accurate or upon request of and at the expense of WABC, KSB shall immediately obtain updated independent appraisals by an Independent Appraiser and provide copies of all such appraisals to WABC. Any new or additional write-downs or OREO expenses shall be recorded immediately upon receiving any updated independent appraisal. WABC and KSB agree to accept the views of the Independent Loan Reviewer and Independent Appraiser with respect to loan grades, loan provisions, collateral and OREO values and related matters under this section. When this method results in a determination that a loan or asset should have a reserve amount or an additional reserve amount associated with it, the reserve shall be created by an addition to the allowance for loan losses and not by a reallocation of amounts in the existing allowance. The parties agree that adjustments made under this section shall be deemed consistent with GAAP.
     (v) WABC has conducted a review of certain of KSB’s loans, and WABC and KSB have reached a compromise on appropriate grades and reserves with respect to those loans on a separate schedule. Notwithstanding clauses (i) to (iv) above, the grading of and reserve for those loans shall not be changed or subject to review by the Independent Loan Reviewer in the absence of a material change in the payment performance or prospects for continued payment of such loans. If any such material change occurs, those loans shall be subject to review in the same manner as all other loans.
     (vi) Except as provided otherwise above, KSB and WABC shall each pay one half of all fees and expenses of the Independent Loan Reviewer and any Independent Appraiser.

4.     REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF KSB.

     KSB represents     The following representations and warrantswarranties by Redwood Empire to WABC that, except as otherwise set forth in aWestamerica are qualified by the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule (the “Disclosure“Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule”) delivered by KSBRedwood Empire to WABCWestamerica at the time this Agreement is signed:signed. The Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule shall refer to the representation or warranty to which exceptions or matters disclosed therein relate; provided, however, that an exception or matter disclosed with respect to one representation or warranty shall also be deemed disclosed with respect to each other warranty or representation to which the exception or matter reasonably relates. The inclusion of any item in such Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule shall not be deemed an admission that such item is a material fact, event or circumstance or that such item has or had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect.

     (a) Corporate Status and Power to Enter Into Agreements. KSB (i)Redwood Empire is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under California law and is a registered bank holding company under the BHCA. NBR is a national banking corporationassociation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State ofUnited States and holds a currently valid license issued by the OCC to engage in the commercial banking business in California (ii) subjectat the offices in which such business is conducted. Subject to the approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby by the shareholders of KSB, the FRB, Redwood Empire and the DFI, hasNBR have all necessary corporate power to enter into this Agreement and to carry out all of the terms and provisions hereof and thereof to be carried out by it, and (iii)them. Neither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries is in full compliancesubject to any order of or agreement or understanding with any agreements, understandings or orders of the FRB, OCC, FDIC and the DFI or any other regulatory authority having jurisdiction over its business or any of its assets or properties. Neither the scope of the business of KSBRedwood Empire or NBR nor the location of its properties requires it to be licensed to do business in any jurisdiction other than the State of California. KSB’sNBR’s deposits are insured by the FDIC in the manner and to the full extent provided by law.

19


     (b) Articles, Bylaws, Books and Records. The copies of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of KSB whichRedwood Empire and the Articles of Association and Bylaws of NBR that shall be delivered to WABCWestamerica promptly after the date hereof are complete and accurate copies thereof as in effect on the date hereof. The minute books of KSB whichRedwood Empire and NBR that shall be made available to WABCWestamerica contain a materially complete and accurate record of all meetings of the Boards of Director (and committees

13


thereof) and shareholders. The corporate books and records (including financial statements) of KSBRedwood Empire and NBR fairly reflect the material transactions to which KSBRedwood Empire or NBR is a party or by which its properties are subject or bound, and such books and records have been properly kept and maintained. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of KSBRedwood Empire and the Articles of Association and Bylaws of NBR and all amendments thereto have been duly approved by all requisite corporate action and by the appropriate regulatory authority to the extent required by law.

     (c) Compliance With Laws, Regulations and Decrees. KSBEach of Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries: (i) has the corporate power to own or lease its properties and to conduct its business as currently conducted, (ii) in all material respects has complied with, and is not in default of, any laws, regulations, ordinances, orders or decrees applicable to the conduct of its business and the ownership of its properties, including but not limited to all federal and state laws (including but not limited to the Bank Secrecy Act), rules and regulations relating to the offer, sale or issuance of securities, and the operation of a commercial bank, (iii) has not failed to file with the proper federal, state, local or other authorities any material report or other document required to be so filed, (iv) has all approvals, authorizations, consents, licenses, clearances and orders of, and has currently effective all registrations with, all governmental and regulatory authorities which are necessary to the business and operations of it as now being conducted, and (v) has not received notification, formally or informally, from any agency or department of any federal, state or local government or any regulatory agency or the staff thereof (A) asserting that it is not in compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances which such government or regulatory authority enforces, or (B) threatening to revoke any licenses, franchise, permit or governmental authorization.

     (d) Execution and Delivery of the Agreement.

     (i) The execution and delivery of this Agreement has been duly authorized by the required majority approval of the respective Boards of Directors of Redwood Empire and NBR and, when this Agreement and the Merger have been duly approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Redwood Empire common stock at a meeting of shareholders duly called and held and by Redwood Empire as the sole shareholder of NBR, this Agreement and the Mergers will be duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of Redwood Empire and NBR. Actions taken by the Board of Directors of Company and to be taken by the shareholders of Redwood Empire are sufficient to render inapplicable to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby all state takeover statutes and any similar “takeover” or “interested stockholder” law.

     (ii) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Redwood Empire and NBR and (assuming due execution and delivery by Westamerica and WAB) constitutes the legal and binding obligations of Redwood Empire and NBR (subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and civil laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general applicability).

     (iii) The execution and delivery by Redwood Empire and NBR of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions provided for in this Agreement (A) do not violate any provision of the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of Redwood Empire or Articles of Association or Bylaws of NBR, any provision of federal or state law or any governmental rule or regulation (assuming (1) receipt of the Government Approvals, (2) receipt of the requisite Redwood Empire shareholder approval, (3) due registration of the Westamerica Shares under the 1933 Act, (4) receipt of appropriate permits or approvals under state securities or “blue sky” laws, and (5) accuracy of the representations of Westamerica set forth herein), and (B) except as set forth in Section 4(d) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, do not require any consent of any person under, conflict with or result in a breach of, or accelerate the performance required by any of the terms of, any material debt instrument, lease, license, covenant, agreement or understanding to which Redwood

20


Empire or any of its subsidiaries is a party or by which it is bound or any order, ruling, decree, judgment, arbitration award or stipulation to which Redwood Empire any of its subsidiaries is subject, or constitute a default thereunder or result in the creation of any lien, claim, security interest, encumbrance, charge, restriction or right of any third party of any kind whatsoever upon any of the properties or assets of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries.

(e) Capitalization. The authorized common stockcapital of KSBRedwood Empire consists of 3,200,00010,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value, of which 1,427,5074,952,123 shares are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and currently outstanding, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock no par value, of which no shares have been issued or are outstanding. SaidAll outstanding shares of common stock hashave been issued in compliance with all applicable securities laws. No other equity securities of KSBRedwood Empire have been issued or are outstanding. There are currently outstanding optionsRedwood Options to purchase 63,130311,685 shares of KSBRedwood Empire common stock issued pursuant to the Option Plan. Of suchPlan and options 56,000 have an exercise price below $10.86, andto purchase 32,000 shares of Redwood Empire common stock issued other than pursuant to the Option Plan as described in Section 4(e) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule. The weighted average exercise price of such options is $6.08$12.22 per share. Said options were granted and, upon issuance in accordance with the terms of the outstanding options said shares shall be issued, in compliance with all applicable securities laws. The authorized capital of NBR consists of 4,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $2.77 7/9 per share, all of the outstanding shares of which are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable (except as provided in the National Bank Act) and owned by Redwood Empire. Otherwise, there are no outstanding (i) options, agreements, calls or commitments of any character which would obligate KSBRedwood Empire or NBR to issue, sell, pledge, assign or otherwise encumber or dispose of, or to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, any KSB common stock or any other equity security of KSB,Redwood Empire or NBR, or (ii) warrants or options relating to, rights to acquire, or debt or equity securities convertible into, shares of KSB common stock or any other equity security of KSB.Redwood Empire or NBR to which Redwood Empire or NBR is a party.

     (e)(f) Equity Interests. KSB does not own,Except as set forth in Section 4(f) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule and for (i) Redwood Empire’s equity interest in NBR, Redwood Statutory Trust I, a Connecticut statutory trust, and Redwood Statutory Trust II, a Connecticut statutory trust, (ii) NBR’s equity interest in Valley Mortgage Corporation and Redwood Merchant Services, Inc., each of which is inactive, and (iii) securities acquired in foreclosure or in lieu of foreclosure in the Ordinary Course of Business, neither Redwood Empire nor NBR owns, directly or indirectly, any equity interest in any bank, corporation, or other entity. Section 4(f) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule sets forth the authorized capitalization, number and ownership of outstanding equity securities and existence of warrants or options relating to, rights to acquire, or debt or equity securities convertible into, equity securities of each of Redwood Empire’s subsidiaries other than NBR. All of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock or other equity ownership interests of each subsidiary of Redwood Empire or NBR (other than NBR) are owned by Redwood Empire or NBR, directly or indirectly, free and clear of any material liens, pledges, charges and security interests and similar encumbrances (“Liens”), and all of such shares or equity ownership interests are duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive rights. No such significant subsidiary has or is bound by any outstanding subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, commitments or agreements of any character calling for the purchase or issuance of any shares of capital stock or any other equity security of such subsidiary or any securities representing the right to purchase or otherwise receive any shares of capital stock or any other equity security of such subsidiary.

     (f)(g) Securities Law Filings. Since December 31, 1998, Redwood Empire has filed and will file all documents required to be filed by it under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 and the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, all as amended, and that as of their respective dates, none of these documents contained as of the date of the filing thereof any untrue statement of material fact or omitted to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein in light of the circumstances under which they were made or will be made not misleading.

(h) Financial Statements, Regulatory Reports. No financial statement or other document provided or to be provided to WABCWestamerica as required by Section 3.2(f) hereof, as of the date of such document, contained, or as to documents to be delivered after the date hereof, will contain, any untrue statement of a

21


material fact, or, at the date thereof, omitted or will omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were or will be made, not misleading; provided, however, that information as of a later date included with such financial statements or other documents provided or to be provideprovided to WABCWestamerica shall be deemed to modify information supplied to WABCWestamerica as of any earlier date. KSB hasRedwood Empire and NBR have filed all material documents and reports relating to KSBRedwood Empire or NBR required to be filed with the FRB, the FDIC, the DFI,OCC, or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over its business or any of its assets or properties. All such reports conform in all material respects with the requirements promulgated by such regulatory agencies. AllExcept as set forth in Section 4(h) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, all compliance or corrective action relating to KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries required by governmental authorities and regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over KSB haveRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries has been taken. KSBNeither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries is not subject to any order, agreement or written directive from or with any regulatory authority with respect to its assets or business except for matters of general application. KSB hasRedwood Empire and its subsidiaries have paid all assessments made or imposed by any governmental agency. KSB shall deliver to WABC copies of all annual management letters and opinions, and shall make available to WABC for inspection all reviews, correspondence and other documents in the files of KSB prepared by Moss Adams or any other certified public accountant engaged by KSB and delivered to KSB since January 1, 1999. The consolidated financial records of KSBRedwood Empire have been, and are being and shall be,

14


maintained in all material respects in accordance with all applicable legal and accounting requirements sufficient to insure that all transactions reflected therein are, in all material respects, executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization and recorded in conformity with GAAP, or applicable RAP, at the time in effect. The data processing equipment, data transmission equipment, related peripheral equipment and software used by KSBRedwood Empire in the operation of its business to generate and retrieve financial records are adequate for the current needs of KSB.Redwood Empire.

     (g)(i) Community Reinvestment Act. NBR has received a rating of “satisfactory” in its most recent examination or interim review with respect to the Community Reinvestment Act. NBR has not been advised of any material supervisory concerns regarding its compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act.

(j) Tax Returns. As used in this Agreement, “tax” or “taxes” means any federal, state, local, or foreign income, gross receipts, license, payroll, employment, excise, severance, stamp, occupation, premium, windfall profits, environmental, customs duties, capital stock, franchise, profits, withholding, social security (or similar), unemployment, disability, real property, personal property, sales, use, transfer, registration, value added, alternative or add-on minimum, estimated, or other tax of any kind whatsoever, including any interest, penalty, or addition thereto, whether disputed or not and including any obligation to indemnify or otherwise assume or succeed to the tax liability of any other person.

      (i) KSBEach of Redwood Empire and NBR has timely filed all federal, state, county, local and foreign tax returns required to be filed by it, including, without limitation, estimated tax, use tax, excise tax, real property and personal property tax reports and returns, employer’s withholding tax returns, other withholding tax returns and Federal Unemployment Tax Returns, and all other reports or other information required or requested to be filed by it with respect thereto, and each such return, report or other information was, when filed, complete and accurate in all material respects. KSBEach of Redwood Empire and NBR has paid all taxes, fees and other governmental charges, including any interest and penalties thereon, when they have become due, except those that are being contested in good faith, which contested matters have been disclosed in the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule. KSBEach of Redwood Empire and NBR has notrecorded adequate reserves for all unpaid tax liabilities, including all tax benefits previously claimed with respect to its ownership of NBR Real Estate Investment Trust or any other real estate investment trust or similar vehicle. Neither Redwood Empire nor NBR has been requested to give orand neither has given any currently effective waivers extending the statutory period of limitation applicable to any tax return required to be filed by it for any period. There are no claims pending against KSBRedwood Empire or NBR for any alleged deficiency in the payment of any taxes, and KSB does not knowneither Redwood Empire nor NBR knows of any pending or threatened audits, investigations or claims for unpaid taxes or relating to any liability in respect of any taxes. ThereSince December 31, 2003, there have been no events, including a change in ownership, that would result in a reappraisal and establishment of a new base-year full value for purposes of Article XIII. AXIIIA of the California Constitution, of any real property owned in whole or in part by KSBRedwood Empire or NBR or to the best of KSB’sRedwood Empire’s or NBR’s knowledge,

22


of any real property leased by KSB.Redwood Empire or NBR (disregarding for this purpose the acquisition of real property through foreclosure or in lieu of foreclosure of a security interest).
 
      (ii) KSBEach of Redwood Empire and NBR has notwithheld and paid all material taxes required to have been withheld and paid in connection with any amounts paid or owing to any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder, or other third party.
     (iii) Neither Redwood Empire nor NBR has filed any consolidated federal income tax return withas a member of an “affiliated group” (within the meaning of Section 1504 of the Code) where KSBRedwood Empire was not the common parent of the group. KSBNeither Redwood Empire nor NBR is not or has not been a party to any tax allocation agreement or arrangement pursuant to which it has any contingent, successor, or outstanding liability for the taxes of anyone other than KSB. KSBRedwood Empire and NBR. Redwood Empire is not required to include in income any adjustment pursuant to Section 481(a) of the Code, no such adjustment has been proposed by the IRS and no pending request for permission to change any accounting method has been submitted by KSB. KSB has not filed a consent pursuant to Section 341 of the Code or agreed to have Section 341(f)(2) of the Code apply.Redwood Empire.
 
      (iii) KSB(iv) Neither Redwood Empire nor NBR has not constituted either a “distributing corporation” or a “controlled corporation” in a distribution of stock qualifying for Tax-freetax-free treatment under sectionSection 355 of the Code (x) in two years prior to the date of this Agreement or (y) in a distribution which could otherwise constitute part of a “plan” or “series of related transactions” (within the meaning of Section 355(e) of the Code) in conjunction with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
     (iv) KSB shall deliver to WABC copies of all its and its subsidiaries’ tax returns with respect to taxes payable to the United States of America and the State of California for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 (when available), 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997.

     (h)     Material Adverse Change.(k) Absence of Certain Changes. Since September 30, 2001,December 31, 2003, there has been (i) no material adverse change in the business, assets, licenses, permits, franchises, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of KSB as a whole (whether or not in the Ordinary Course of Business),with respect to Redwood Empire, (ii) no change in any of the assets, licenses, permits or franchises of KSB that has had or can reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on any of the items listed in clause (i) above, (iii) no damage, destruction, or other casualty loss (whether or not covered by insurance) that has had or can reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on any of the items listed in clause (i) above, (iv) no amendment, modification, or termination of any existing, or entering into of any new, contract, agreement, plan, lease, license, permit or franchise that is material to the business, financial condition, assets, liabilities, operationsRedwood Empire or prospectsany of KSB, taken as a whole,its subsidiaries, except in the Ordinary Course of Business; (v)Business, and (iii) no disposition by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries of one or more assets that, individually or in the aggregate, are material to it, except sales of assets in the Ordinary Course of Business. The incurrence and payment of Merger-related expenses not exceeding those disclosed in the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule shall not in themselves constitute a material adverse change for this purpose, but the determination of all other financial requirements in this Agreement shall include the effect of Merger-related expenses.

15


     (i)(l) No Undisclosed Liabilities.Except as set forth in Section 4(l) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, and except for items for which reserves have been established in the unaudited consolidated balance sheets of KSBRedwood Empire as of September 30, 2001, KSBMarch 31, 2004, neither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries has not incurred or discharged, and is not legally obligated with respect to, any indebtedness, liability (including, without limitation, a liability arising out of an indemnification, guarantee, hold harmless or similar arrangement) or obligation (accrued or contingent, whether due or to become due, and whether or not subordinated to the claims of its general creditors), other than as a result of operations in the Ordinary Course of Business after such date. NoExcept as set forth in Section 4(l) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, no agreement pursuant to which any loans or other assets have been or will be sold by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries entitle the buyer of such loans or other assets, unless there is material breach of a representation or covenant by the seller, to cause KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries to repurchase such loan or other asset or the buyer to pursue any other form of recourse against KSB. KSB hasRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries. Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries have not knowingly made and shall not make any representations or covenants in any such agreement that contained or shall contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted or shall omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein, in light of the circumstances under which such representations and/or covenants were made or shall be made, not misleading. No cash, stock or other dividend or any other distribution with respect to the stock of KSBRedwood Empire (other than regular quarterly cash dividends consistent with past practice) has been declared, set aside or paid, nor have any shares of the stock of KSBRedwood Empire been purchased, redeemed or otherwise acquired, directly or indirectly, by KSBRedwood Empire since September 30, 2001.December 31, 2003.

     (j)(m) Indemnification. Other than pursuant to the provisions of their respective Articles of Incorporation or Articles of Association, as the case may be, or Bylaws, or as disclosed in Section 4(m) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, or pursuant to non-material contracts entered into in the Ordinary Course of

23


Business, neither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to any indemnification agreement with any of its present or past officers, directors, employees, agents or other persons who serve or served in any other capacity with any other enterprise at the request of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries, and to the best knowledge of Redwood Empire, there are no claims for which any person would be entitled to indemnification by Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries if such provisions were deemed in effect.

(n) Properties and Leases.

     (i) KSB has good and marketable title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and the right of possession, subject to existing leaseholds, to all real properties and good title to all other property and assets, tangible and intangible, reflected in the KSB consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2001 (except property held as lessee under leases disclosed in the Disclosure Schedule and except personal property sold or otherwise disposed of since September 30, 2001 in the Ordinary Course of Business), except (a) liens for taxes or assessments not delinquent, (b) liens, encumbrances and imperfections of title not created or suffered to be created by KSB nor actually known to KSB; (c) such other liens and encumbrances and imperfections of title as do not materially and adversely affect the value of such property as reflected in the KSB consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2001, or as currently shown on the books and records of KSB and which do not interfere with or impair the present and continued use, or (d) exceptions disclosed in title reports and preliminary title reports, copies of which shall be provided to WABC. To the actual knowledge of KSB, all tangible properties of KSB conform in all material respects with all applicable ordinances, regulations and zoning laws. All tangible properties of KSB are in a good state of maintenance and repair, normal wear and tear excepted, and are adequate for the current business of KSB. No properties of KSB, are the subject of any pending or, to KSB’s actual knowledge, threatened investigation, claim or proceeding relating to the use, storage or disposal on such property of or contamination of such property by any toxic or hazardous waste material or substance; nor, to KSB’s actual knowledge, are any properties in which KSB holds a collateral or contingent interest or purchase option subject to any such pending or threatened investigation, claim or proceeding. To KSB’s actual knowledge, KSB does not own, possesses or have a collateral or contingent interest or purchase option in any properties or other assets which contain or have located within or thereon any hazardous or toxic waste material or substance unless the location of such hazardous or toxic waste material or other substance or its use thereon conforms in all material respects with all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations or other provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment. As to any asset not owned or leased by KSB, KSB has not controlled, directed or participated in the operation or management of any such asset or any facilities or enterprise conducted thereon in such a manner as to cause KSB     (i) Section 4(n) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule sets forth each office, branch, facility and other place of business of Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries, its address, function and whether it is owned or leased by Redwood Empire. Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries have good and marketable title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and the right of possession, subject to existing leaseholds, to all real properties and good title to all other property and assets, tangible and intangible, reflected in the Redwood Empire consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 (except property held as lessee under leases disclosed in Section 4(n) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule and except personal property sold or otherwise disposed of since December 31, 2003 in the Ordinary Course of Business), except (a) liens for taxes or assessments not delinquent; (b) liens, encumbrances and imperfections of title not created or suffered to be created by Redwood Empire nor actually known to Redwood Empire; (c) such other liens and encumbrances and imperfections of title as do not materially and adversely affect the value of such property as reflected in the Redwood Empire consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, or as currently shown on the books and records of Redwood Empire and which do not interfere with or impair the present and continued use; or (d) exceptions disclosed in title reports and preliminary title reports, copies of which shall be provided to Westamerica. To the actual knowledge of Redwood Empire, all tangible properties of Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries conform in all material respects with all applicable ordinances, regulations and zoning laws. All tangible properties of Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries are in a good state of maintenance and repair, normal wear and tear excepted, and are adequate for the current business of Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries. Except for its main office at 111 Santa Rosa Avenue, in Santa Rosa, as to which Section 4(n) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, to the knowledge of Redwood Empire, provides complete and accurate information, (A) no properties of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries are the subject of any pending or, to Redwood Empire’s actual knowledge, threatened investigation, claim or proceeding relating to the use, storage or disposal on such property of or contamination of such property by any toxic or hazardous waste material or substance; nor, to Redwood Empire’s actual knowledge, are any properties in which Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries holds a collateral or contingent interest or purchase option subject to any such pending or threatened investigation, claim or proceeding, and (B) to Redwood Empire’s actual knowledge, except as set forth in Section 3(h)(ii)(H) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, none of Redwood Empire and any of its subsidiaries owns, possesses or has a collateral or contingent interest or purchase option in any properties or other assets which contain or have located within or thereon any hazardous or toxic waste material or substance unless the location of such hazardous or toxic waste material or other substance or its use thereon conforms in all material respects with all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations or other provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment. As to any asset not owned or leased by Redwood Empire or one of its subsidiaries, Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries have not controlled, directed or participated in the operation or management of any such asset or any facilities or enterprise conducted thereon in such a manner as to cause Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries to be deemed by a court of competent jurisdiction to be an owner or operator of such asset under applicable environmental laws.
     (ii) All properties held by KSB under leases are held under valid, binding and enforceable leases (subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and civil laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general applicability), with such exceptions as are not material and do not interfere with the conduct of the business of KSB, and KSB enjoy quiet and peaceful possession of such leased property. KSB is not in default in any respect under any material lease, agreement or obligation regarding its properties to which it is a party or by which it is bound.

16     (ii) All properties held by Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries under leases are held under valid, binding and enforceable leases (subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and civil laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general applicability), with such exceptions as are not material and do not interfere with the conduct of the business of Redwood Empire or its subsidiaries, and Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries enjoy quiet and peaceful possession of such leased property. Neither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries is in default in any respect under any material lease, agreement or obligation regarding its properties to which it is a party or by which it is bound.

24


     (iii) Except as disclosed in the Disclosure Schedule, none of KSB’s rights and obligations under the leases referred to in Section 4(j)     (iii) Except as disclosed in Section 4(n) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, none of Redwood Empire’s or any of its subsidiaries’ rights and obligations under the leases referred to in Section 4(n)(ii) above require the consent of any other party to the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. Where required, KSB shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain, prior to the Effective Date, all consents to the transaction contemplated by this Agreement required to be obtained under such leases.

     (k)(o) Material Contracts.KSB Except as disclosed in Section 4(o) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule (and except for loans, loan commitments and letters of credit or similar obligations arising in the Ordinary Course of Business of NBR), neither Redwood Empire nor any of it subsidiaries is not a party to or bound by any contract or other agreement made in the Ordinary Course of Business which involves aggregate future payments by or to it of more than $25,000 and which is made for a fixed period expiring more than one year from the date hereof, and KSBneither Redwood Empire nor any of it subsidiaries is not a party to or bound by any agreement not made in the Ordinary Course of Business which is to be performed at or after the date hereof. Each of the contracts and agreements disclosed in Section 4(o) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule pursuant to this Section 4(k) is a legal and binding obligation (subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general applicability), and no breach or default (and no condition which, with notice or passage of time, or both, could become a breach or default) exists with respect thereto. No power of attorney or similar authorization given directly or indirectly by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries is currently outstanding.

     (l)(p) Classified Loans.There Except as disclosed in Section 4(p) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, there are no loans presently owned by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries that have been classified by any bank examiner, outside loan reviewer, accountant or management as “Other Loans Especially Mentioned,” “Substandard,” “Doubtful,” or “Loss” or classified using categories with similar import and all loans or portions thereof classified “Loss” have been charged off. Notwithstanding the above, KSBRedwood Empire shall not be under any obligation to disclose to WABCWestamerica any such classification by any bank examiner where such disclosure would violate any obligation of confidentiality of KSBRedwood Empire imposed by the FDIC, the DFI,OCC or other regulator. KSBRedwood Empire and its subsidiaries regularly reviewsreview and appropriately classifiesclassify loans in accordance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements and generally accepted banking practices. All loans and investments of KSBRedwood Empire and its subsidiaries are legal, valid and binding obligations enforceable in accordance with their respective terms and are not subject to any setoffs, counterclaims or disputes (subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general applicability), except as disclosed in Section 4(p) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule or reserved for in the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of KSBRedwood Empire as of September 30, 2001,March 31, 2004, and were duly authorized under and made in compliance with applicable federal and state laws and regulations. KSB hasRedwood Empire and its subsidiaries have no extensions of credit, investments, guarantees, indemnification agreements or commitments for the same (including without limitation commitments to issue letters of credit, to create acceptances, or to repurchase securities, federal funds or other assets) other than those documented on the books and records of KSB.Redwood Empire.

     (m)(q) Restrictions on Investments.Except for pledges to secure public and trust deposits and repurchase agreements in the Ordinary Course of Business and to secure advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, none of the investments reflected in the KSBRedwood Empire consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2001,December 31, 2003, and none of the investments made by KSBRedwood Empire since September 30, 2001,December 31, 2003, are subject to any restriction, whether contractual or statutory, which materially impairs the ability of KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries freely to dispose of such investment at any time. With respect to all material repurchase agreements to which Redwood Empire, NBR or any Redwood Empire Subsidiary, is a party, Redwood Empire, NBR or Redwood Empire Subsidiary has a valid, perfected first lien or security interest in the government securities or other collateral securing each such repurchase agreement, and the value of the collateral securing each such repurchase agreement equals or exceeds the amount of the debt secured by such collateral under such agreement. Except for any securities sold subject to repurchase obligations in the normal course of business and any loans or loan participations subject to customary repurchase obligations, none of Redwood Empire, NBR or Redwood Empire Subsidiaries has sold or otherwise disposed of any assets in a transaction in which the acquirer of such assets or other person has the right, either conditionally or absolutely,

25


to require Redwood Empire, NBR or any Redwood Empire Subsidiary to repurchase or otherwise reacquire any such assets.

     (n)(r) Employment Contracts and Benefits.Benefits

     (i) Section 4(r) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule lists all bonus, incentive compensation, profit-sharing, pension, retirement, stock purchase, stock option, deferred compensation, severance, hospitalization, medical, dental, vision, group insurance, death benefits, disability and other fringe benefit plans, trust agreements, arrangements and commitments which Redwood Empire maintains, contributes to or has any outstanding liability in respect of (including but not limited to such plans, agreements, arrangements and commitments applicable to former employees or retired employees, or for which such persons are eligible), if any (the “Benefit Plans” and each a “Benefit Plan”), and any and all contracts of employment and has made available to Westamerica any Board of Directors’ minutes (or committee minutes) authorizing, approving or guaranteeing such Plans and contracts. There are no agreements or understandings, either written or oral, between Redwood Empire and any person which would result in the payment of any consideration as a result of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement other than as disclosed in Section 4(r) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule. Redwood Empire has heretofore delivered to Westamerica true, correct and complete copies of each Benefit Plan, and with respect to each such Benefit Plan true, correct and complete copies of (a) any associated trust, custodial, insurance or service agreements, (b) any annual report, actuarial report, or disclosure materials (including specifically any summary plan descriptions) submitted to any governmental agency or distributed to participants or beneficiaries thereunder in the current or any of the three (3) preceding calendar years and (c) the most recently received IRS determination letters and any governmental advisory opinions, rulings, compliance statements, closing agreements, or similar materials specific to such Benefit Plan.

     (ii) Except as disclosed in Section 4(r) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will not: (i) entitle any current or former employee of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries to severance pay, unemployment compensation or any similar payment; (ii) accelerate the time of payment or vesting, or increase the amount of any compensation due to, or in respect of, any current or former employee of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries; (iii) result in or satisfy a condition to the payment of compensation that would, in combination with any other payment, result in an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of IRC section 280G(b) or would not be fully deductible as a result of IRC section 162(m) or any corresponding provision of state, local or foreign tax law; or (iv) constitute or involve a prohibited transaction (as defined in ERISA section 406 or IRC section 4975), constitute or involve a breach of fiduciary responsibility within the meaning of ERISA section 502(l) or otherwise violate Part 4 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA.

     (iii) Except with respect to the Redwood Options, each Benefit Plan can be amended, terminated or otherwise discontinued after the Effective Date, without material liability to the Westamerica (other than ordinary administration expenses and severance obligations disclosed in Section 4(r) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule). Redwood Empire has not announced its intention, or undertaken (whether or not legally bound) to modify or terminate any Benefit Plan or adopt any arrangement or program which, once established, would come within the definition of a Benefit Plan.

     (iv) With respect to each Benefit Plan which is an employee benefit plan (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA) and which is subject to the reporting, disclosure and record retention requirements set forth in the IRC and Part 1 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA and the regulations thereunder, each of such requirements has been fully met on a timely basis.

     (v) With respect to each Benefit Plan which is an employee benefit plan (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA) and which is subject to Part 4 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA, none of the following now exists or has existed within the six-year period ending on the date hereof:

      (i) KSB shall deliver to WABC in the Disclosure Schedule an accurate list setting forth all bonus, incentive compensation, profit-sharing, pension, retirement, stock purchase, stock option, deferred compensation, severance, hospitalization, medical, dental, vision, group insurance, death benefits, disability and other fringe benefit plans, trust agreements, arrangements and commitments of KSB (including but not limited to such plans, agreements, arrangements and commitments applicable to former employees or retired employees, or for which such persons are eligible), if any, together with copies of all such plans, agreements, arrangements and commitments that are documented, any and all contracts of employment and has made available to WABC any Board of Directors’ minutes (or committee minutes) authorizing, approving or guaranteeing such plans and contracts. There are no agreements or understandings, either written or oral, between KSB and any person which would result in the payment of any consideration as a result of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement other than as disclosed in the Disclosure Schedule.

17


     (ii) Except as set forth in the Disclosure Schedule, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will not: (i) entitle any current or former KSB Employee to severance pay, unemployment compensation or any similar payment; (ii) accelerate the time of payment or vesting, or increase the amount of any compensation due to, or in respect of, any current or former KSB Employee; (iii) result in or satisfy a condition to the payment of compensation that would, in combination with any other payment, result in an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of IRC section 280G(b); or (iv) constitute or involve a prohibited transaction (as defined in ERISA section 406 or IRC section 4975), constitute or involve a breach of fiduciary responsibility within the meaning of ERISA section 502(l) or otherwise violate Part 4 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA.
     (iii) Each such plan listed in the Disclosure Schedule can be amended, terminated or otherwise discontinued after the Effective Date, without material liability to the WABC (other than ordinary administration expenses and severance obligations disclosed in the Disclosure Schedule);
     (iv) With respect to each employee benefit plan (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA) which is listed in the Disclosure Schedule and which is subject to the reporting, disclosure and record retention requirements set forth in the IRC and Part 1 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA and the regulations thereunder, each of such requirements has been fully met on a timely basis.
     (v) With respect to each employee benefit plan (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA) which is listed in the Disclosure Schedule and which is subject to Part 4 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA, none of the following now exists or has existed within the six-year period ending on the date hereof:

(1)Any act or omission constituting a material violation of Section 402 of ERISA;
 
      (2)Any act or omission constituting a violation of Section 403 of ERISA;

26


      (3)Any act or omission by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries, or by any director, officer or employee thereof, constituting a violation of Sections 404 and 405 of ERISA;
 
      (4)To the knowledge of KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries, any act or omission by any other person constituting a violation of Sections 404 or 405 of ERISA;
 
      (5)Any act or omission which constitutes a violation of Sections 406 or 407 of ERISA and is not exempted by Section 408 of ERISA or which constitutes a violation of Section 4975(c) of the IRC and is not exempted by Section 4975(d) of the IRC; or
 
      (6)Any act or omission constituting a violation of Sections 503, 510 or 511 of ERISA.

     (vi) All contributions, premiums or other payments due from KSB and its subsidiaries to (or under) any plan listed in the Disclosure Schedule have been fully paid or adequately provided for on the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2000 and period ended September 30, 2001. All accruals thereon (including, where appropriate, proportional accruals for partial periods) have been made in accordance with GAAP consistently applied on a reasonable basis.
     (vii) Each plan listed in the Disclosure Schedule complies with all applicable requirements of (A) the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, and the regulations thereunder and (B) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the regulations thereunder.
     (viii) Each plan listed in the Disclosure Schedule complies with all applicable requirements of (A) the health care continuation coverage provisions of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, and the regulations thereunder.
     (ix) KSB shall disclose in the Disclosure Schedule the names of each director, officer and employee of KSB.
     (x) KSB has not, prior to the Effective Date, in any material respect, violated any of the health care continuation requirements of COBRA, the requirements of FMLA, the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, the requirements of the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998, the requirements of the Newborns’ and Mothers’ Health Protection Act of

18


1996, or any amendment to each such act, or any similar provisions of state law applicable to its Employees.
     (xi) As of the date hereof, KSB and any entity with which KSB could be considered a single employer under 29 U.S.C. section 2101(a)(1) or under any relevant case law, has not incurred any liability or obligation under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, as it may be amended from time to time, and within the 90-day period immediately following the date hereof, will not incur any such liability or obligation if, during such 90-day period, only terminations of employment in the normal course of operations occur.

     (vi) All contributions, premiums or other payments due from Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries to (or under) any Benefit Plan have been fully paid or adequately provided for on the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 and period ended March 31, 2004. All accruals thereon (including, where appropriate, proportional accruals for partial periods) have been made in accordance with GAAP consistently applied on a reasonable basis.

     (vii) Each Benefit Plan complies with all applicable requirements of (A) the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, and the regulations thereunder and (B) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the regulations thereunder.

     (viii) Each Benefit Plan complies with all applicable requirements of the health care continuation coverage provisions of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, and the regulations thereunder.

     (ix) Redwood Empire has disclosed in Section 4(r) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule the names of each director, officer and employee of Redwood Empire and each of its subsidiaries.

     (x) Neither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries has, prior to the Effective Date, in any material respect, violated any of the health care continuation requirements of COBRA, the requirements of FMLA, the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, the requirements of the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998, the requirements of the Newborns’ and Mothers’ Health Protection Act of 1996, or any amendment to each such act, or any similar provisions of state law applicable to its Employees.

     (xi) As of the date hereof, Redwood Empire and any entity with which Redwood Empire could be considered a single employer under 29 U.S.C. section 2101(a)(1) or under any relevant case law, has not incurred any liability or obligation under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, as it may be amended from time to time, and within the 90-day period immediately following the date hereof, will not incur any such liability or obligation if, during such 90-day period, only terminations of employment in the normal course of operations occur.

(o)(s) Compliance With ERISA.KSB Neither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries has, not, since its inception, either maintained or contributed to an employee pension benefit plan, as defined in Section 3(2) of ERISA, including multi-employer plans, other than the KSB Simplified Employee PensionRedwood Empire Bancorp 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”“Redwood Plan”), a true and accurate copy of which shall be provided to WABC.. With respect to the Redwood Plan, as of the Effective Time (i) the form of the Redwood Plan, to the best of KSB’sRedwood Empire’s knowledge, willhas in all material respects bebeen (and currently is) in compliance with all the applicable requirements of Section 401 or Section 408 of the IRC;IRC, as applicable; (ii) KSBRedwood Empire shall not have amended the Redwood Plan or administered the Redwood Plan in a manner inconsistent with such requirements; (iii) no contributions have exceeded the limitations set forth in Section 415 of the IRC; (iv) all required and necessary filings with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), Department of Labor and any other governmental agencies with respect to the Redwood Plan for all periods ending at or prior to the Effective Time will have been made on a timely basis by KSBRedwood Empire and the plan administrator; (v) there shall have been no material violation of Parts 1 and 4 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA or of Section 4975 of the IRC; and (vi) there shall have been no action, claim or demand of any kind known to KSBRedwood Empire brought or threatened by any potential claimant or representative of such claimant under the Redwood Plan or Trust where KSBRedwood Empire may be either (A) liable directly on such action,

27


claim or demand, or (B) obligated to indemnify any person, group of persons or entity with respect to such action, claim or demand, unless such action, claim or demand is covered by adequate reserves reflected in KSB’s June 30, 2001Redwood Empire’s December 31, 2003, financial statements or an insurer of KSBRedwood Empire has agreed to defend against and pay the amount of any resulting liability without reservation.

     (p)(t) Absence of Certain Matters or Arrangements.

     (i) There is no pending or threatened legal action, proceeding or investigation, other than routine claims for benefits, concerning any Benefit Plan or to the best knowledge of Redwood Empire any fiduciary or service provider thereof and, to the best knowledge of Redwood Empire, there is no basis for any such legal action, proceeding or investigation.

     (ii) No communication, report or disclosure has been made regarding any Benefit Plan which, at the time made, did not accurately reflect the material terms and operations of the Benefit Plan.

     (iii) No Benefit Plan provides welfare benefits subsequent to termination of employment to employees or their beneficiaries except to the extent required by applicable state insurance laws and Title I, Part 6 of ERISA.

     (iv) No Benefit Plan is a multi-employer plan, as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA, or a plan subject to Section 302 or Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code.

     (v) No Benefit Plan includes any trust or other entity intended to qualify as a “voluntary employees’ beneficiary association” within the meaning of Section 501(c)(9) of the Code.

(u) Collective Bargaining and Employment Agreements. Except as provided in this Agreement or as disclosed in Section 4(u) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, KSB does not haveneither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries has any union or collective bargaining or written employment agreements, contracts or other agreements with any labor organization or with any member of management, or any management or consultation agreement not terminable at will by it without liability, and no such contract or agreement has been requested by, or is under discussion by management with, any group of employees, any member of management or any other person. There are no material controversies pending between KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries and any current or former employees, and to the best of its respective knowledge, there are no efforts presently being made by any labor union seeking to organize any of such employees.

     (q)(v) Compensation of Officers and Employees. NoExcept as disclosed in Section 4(v) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, no officer or employee of KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries is receiving aggregate direct remuneration at a rate exceeding $40,000 per annum. TheExcept as disclosed in Section 4(v) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will not (either alone or upon the occurrence of any additional or further acts or events) result in any payment (whether of severance pay or otherwise) becoming due from KSBRedwood Empire or WABCany of its subsidiaries or Westamerica to any employee of KSB.Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries. Except as disclosed in Section 4(v) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, no employee of Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries is entitled under any existing contract or arrangement to receive or will receive from Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries a partial-year bonus if the Merger or Bank Merger is completed before December 31, 2004.

     (r)(w) Legal Actions and Proceedings. Except as disclosed in Section 4(w) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule, KSBneither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries is not a party to, or so far as KSBRedwood Empire is aware, threatened with, and to its knowledge, there is no reasonable basis for, any legal action or other proceeding or investigation before any court, any arbitrator of any kind or any government agency, KSBagency; and neither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries is not subject to any potential adverse claim, the outcome of which could involve the payment or receipt by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries of any amount in excess of $25,000, unless an insurer of KSBRedwood Empire has agreed to defend against and pay the amount of any resulting liability without reservation, or, if any such legal action, proceeding, investigation or claim will not involve the payment by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries of a monetary amount, which could materially adversely affect KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries or its business or property or the

28


transactions contemplated hereby except as disclosed in Section 4(w) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule. KSBAs of the date hereof, Redwood Empire has no knowledge of any pending or threatened claims or charges under the Community Reinvestment Act, before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the California Department of Fair Housing & Economic Development, the California Unemployment Appeals

19


Board (except claims or charges in the ordinary course of business that are not expected to have a material adverse effect), or any human relations commission. There is no labor dispute, strike, slow-down or stoppage pending or, to the best of the knowledge of KSBRedwood Empire, threatened against KSB.Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries.

     (s)     Execution(x) Intellectual Property. To the best knowledge of Redwood Empire, Redwood Empire and DeliveryNBR own or have a valid license to use all trademarks, trade names and service marks (including any registrations or applications for registration of any of the Agreement.foregoing) (collectively, “Intellectual Property”) necessary to carry on their business substantially as currently conducted, except where such failures to own or validly license such Intellectual Property would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Redwood Empire. Neither Redwood Empire nor NBR has received any notice of infringement of or conflict with, and to Redwood Empire’s knowledge, there are no infringements of or conflicts with, the rights of others with respect to the use of any Intellectual Property that, individually or in the aggregate, in either such case, would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Redwood Empire.

      (i) The execution and delivery of this Agreement has been duly authorized by the Board of Directors of KSB and, when this Agreement and the Merger have been duly approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of KSB common stock at a meeting of shareholders duly called and held, this Agreement and the Merger will be duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of KSB.
(y)     (ii) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by KSB and (assuming due execution and delivery by WABC) constitutes the legal and binding obligations of KSB (subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and civil laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general applicability).
     (iii) The execution and delivery by KSB of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions herein (A) do not violate any provision of the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of KSB , any provision of federal or state law or any governmental rule or regulation (assuming (1) receipt of the Government Approvals, (2) receipt of the requisite KSB shareholder approval referred to in Section 4(s)(i) hereof, (3) due registration of the WABC Shares under the 1933 Act, (4) receipt of appropriate permits or approvals under state securities or “blue sky” laws, and (5) accuracy of the representations of WABC set forth herein), and (B) do not require any consent of any person under, conflict with or result in a breach of, or accelerate the performance required by any of the terms of, any material debt instrument, lease, license, covenant, agreement or understanding to which KSB is a party or by which it is bound or any order, ruling, decree, judgment, arbitration award or stipulation to which KSB is subject, or constitute a default thereunder or result in the creation of any lien, claim, security interest, encumbrance, charge, restriction or right of any third party of any kind whatsoever upon any of the properties or assets of KSB.Derivative Transactions.

     (i) Except as would not have a material adverse effect on Redwood Empire, all Derivative Transactions (as defined herein) entered into by Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries were entered into in accordance with applicable rules, regulations and policies of any governmental authority, and in accordance with the investment, securities, commodities, risk management and other policies, practices and procedures employed by Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries, and were entered into with counterparties who are financially responsible and able to understand (either alone or in consultation with their advisers) and to bear the risks of such Derivative Transactions; and to Redwood Empire’s knowledge, there are no material breaches, violations or defaults or allegations or assertions of such by any party thereunder.

     (ii) “Derivative Transactions” means any swap transaction, option, warrant, forward purchase or sale transaction, futures transaction, cap transaction, floor transaction or collar transaction relating to one or more currencies, commodities, bonds, equity securities, loans, interest rates, credit-related events or conditions or any indexes, or any other similar transaction or combination of any of these transactions, including collateralized mortgage obligations or other similar instruments or any debt or equity instruments evidencing or embedding any such types of transactions, and any related credit support, collateral or other similar arrangements related to such transactions; provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, the term “Derivative Transactions” shall not include any Redwood Options.

(t)(z) Facts Affecting Government Approvals. To the best knowledge of Redwood Empire, there is no fact, event or condition applicable to Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries that will, or reasonably could be expected to, adversely affect the likelihood of securing the Government Approvals required to complete the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(aa) Retention of Broker or Consultant. No broker, agent, finder, consultant or other party (other than legal, compliance, loan auditors and accounting advisors) has been retained by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries or is entitled to be paid based upon any agreements, arrangements or understandings made by KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries in connection with any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except that KSBRedwood Empire has engaged James H. Avery CompanyHovde Financial LLC in connection with this Agreement and has provided WABCWestamerica with a true and complete copy of its engagement agreement with James H. Avery Company.Hovde Financial LLC.

     (u)(bb) Insurance. KSBSection 4(bb) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule lists all insurance policies and bonds maintained by Redwood Empire and any of its subsidiaries, including name of insurer, type of coverage, policy limit, annual premiums and expiration date. Redwood Empire and each of its subsidiaries is

29


and continuously since its inception has been, insured with reputable insurers against all risks normally insured against by banks, and all of the insurance policies and bonds maintained by KSBRedwood Empire and its subsidiaries are in full force and effect, neither isRedwood Empire and its subsidiaries are not in default thereunder and all material claims thereunder have been filed in due and timely fashion. In the best judgment of the management of KSB,Redwood Empire, such insurance coverage is adequate for KSB.Redwood Empire and its subsidiaries. Since December 31, 1999,2003, there has not been any damage to, destruction of, or loss of any assets of KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries not covered by insurance that could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition, properties, assets or results of operations of KSB.would have a material adverse effect on Redwood Empire.

     (v)(cc) Loan Loss Allowance. The allowance for loan losses in the KSBRedwood Empire consolidated balance sheets dated December 31, 20002003 and September 30, 2001, each subsequent period end prior to the Effective Date and as of the Effective Date arewas and will be determined by application of Redwood Empire’s policies and procedures on a basis consistently applied from prior periods and is or will be adequate in all material respects under the requirements of GAAP consistently applied, and all applicable state and federal laws and regulations to provide for possible loan losses on outstanding loans, net of recoveries, but in no event will the allowance as of the SAS 71 Date or later be less than $2,400,000 plus any increases required and less any decreases permitted by Section 3.3(b); provided, however, that the allowance may be less than $2,400,000 if it is determined that such lower allowance would be adequate using WABC’s methodology. KSBrecoveries. Redwood Empire has disclosed in Section 4(cc) of the Disclosure Schedule, and will promptly (and in any event within two business days)Business Days) inform WABCWestamerica of the amounts of all OREO, loans, leases, other extensions of credit or commitments, or other interest-bearing assets of KSBRedwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries that have been classified as of the date hereof or hereafter by any internal bank examiner or any bank regulatory agency as “Other Loans

20


Especially Mentioned”, “Substandard”, “Doubtful”, “Loss”, or words of similar import in the case of loans (or that would have been so classified, in the case of other assets, had they been loans). Notwithstanding the above, KSBRedwood Empire shall be under no obligation to disclose to WABCWestamerica any such classification by any bank regulatory agency where such disclosure would violate any obligation of confidentiality of KSBRedwood Empire imposed by such bank regulatory agency. KSB has furnished and will continue to furnish to WABC true and accurate information concerning the loan portfolio and other real estate owned (“OREO”) of KSB, and no material information with respect to the loan portfolio has been or will be withheld from WABC.

     (w)(dd) Transactions With Affiliates. Except as may arise in the Ordinary Course of Business, KSBneither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries has not extended credit, committed itself to extend credit, or transferred any asset to or assumed or guaranteed any liability of the employees or directors of KSB,Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries, or any spouse or child of any of them, or to any of their “affiliates” or “associates” as such terms are defined in Rule 405 under the 1933 Act. KSBNeither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries has not entered into any other transactions with the employees or directors of KSBRedwood Empire or NBR or any spouse or child of any of them, or any of their affiliates or associates, except as disclosed in Section 4(dd) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule. All such transactions have been on terms no less favorable to KSBRedwood Empire than those which would prevail in an arm’s-length transaction with an independent third party.

     (x)(ee) Information in WABCWestamerica Registration Statement. The information pertaining to KSBRedwood Empire and its subsidiaries which has been or will be furnished to WABCWestamerica for or on behalf of KSBRedwood Empire for inclusion in the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement, the Prospectus (as hereinafter defined) or the Proxy Statement, (each as hereinafter defined), or in the applications to be filed to obtain the Government Approvals (the “Applications”), does not and will not contain any untrue statement of any material fact or omit or will omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; provided, however, that information of a later date shall be deemed to modify information as of an earlier date. All financial statements of KSBRedwood Empire included in the Prospectus and Proxy Statement will present fairly the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of KSBRedwood Empire at the dates and for the periods covered by such statements in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the periods covered by such statements. KSBRedwood Empire shall promptly (and in any event within two business days)Business Days) advise WABCWestamerica in writing if, prior to the Effective Time, KSBRedwood Empire shall obtain knowledge of any facts that would make it necessary to amend the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement, the Proxy Statement or any Application, or to supplement the Prospectus, in order to make the statements therein not misleading or to comply with applicable law.

     (y)(ff) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties. No representation or warranty by KSB,Redwood Empire or NBR and no statement by KSBRedwood Empire or NBR in any certificate, agreement, schedule or other document furnished in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement contains or will

30


contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omits or will omit to state any material fact necessary to make such representation, warranty or statement not misleading to WABC;Westamerica; provided, however, that information as of a later date shall automaticallybe deemed to modify information as of an earlier date.

     (z)(gg) No Brokered Deposits. KSBNBR does not now have and shall not accept prior to or have on the Effective Date any “brokered deposits” as such deposits are defined by the FDIC.

5.     REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF WABC AND WESTAMERICA.(hh) Internal Controls. Redwood Empire has (a) designed disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the 1934 Act) to ensure that information relating to it that is required to be disclosed in its reports under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and presented in its periodic reports most recently filed with the Commission the conclusions of its senior officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by such report based on that evaluation; and (c) disclosed in such report any change in its internal control over financial reporting that occurred during its most recent reporting period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting. Redwood Empire has disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to its auditors and the audit committee of its board of directors: (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect its ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Redwood Empire’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.Representations and Warranties of Westamerica and WAB.

     WABCWestamerica and WestamericaWAB represent and warrant to KSBRedwood Empire and NBR that:

     (a) Corporate Status and Power to Enter Into Agreement. WABC (i) is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under California law and is a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act, (ii) subject to the approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby by the FRB, has all necessary corporate power to enter into this Agreement and to carry out all of the terms and provisions hereof and thereof to be carried out by it. Westamerica holds a currently valid license issued by the DFI to engage in the commercial banking business in California at the offices in which such business is conducted. Neither WABC nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any order of the FRB, the FDIC, the DFI or any other regulatory authority having jurisdiction over its or their business or any of its or their assets or properties. Neither the scope of the business of WABC or Westamerica nor the location of its properties requires it to be licensed to do business in any jurisdiction other than the State of Westamerica is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under California law and is a registered bank holding company under the BHCA. WAB is a California banking corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California and holds a currently valid license issued by the DFI to engage in the commercial banking business in California at the offices in which such business is conducted. Subject to the approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby by the FRB, Westamerica and WAB have all necessary corporate power to enter into this Agreement and to carry out all of the terms and provisions hereof and thereof to be carried out by them. Neither Westamerica nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any order of the FRB, the FDIC, the DFI or any other regulatory authority having jurisdiction over its or their business or any of its or their assets or properties. Neither the scope of the business of Westamerica or WAB nor the location of its properties requires it to be licensed to do business in any jurisdiction other than the State of California. Westamerica is the sole shareholder of WAB. WAB is a member of the Federal Reserve System. WAB’s deposits are insured by the FDIC in the manner and to the full extent provided by law.
(b) Corporate Status and Power of Westamerica and WAB. Prior to and as of the Effective Time, Westamerica and WAB will be corporations duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California and will have the corporate power to enter into the Merger Agreement and to carry out all of the terms and provisions thereof to be carried out by each of them.
(c) Articles, Bylaws, Books and Records. The copies of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Westamerica to be delivered to Redwood Empire are complete and accurate copies thereof as in effect on the date hereof. The corporate books and records (including financial statements) of Westamerica fairly reflect the material transactions to which Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries is a party or by which any of their properties are subject or bound, and such books and records have been properly kept and maintained. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Westamerica and all amendments thereto have been duly approved by all requisite corporate action and said Articles of Incorporation and all amendments thereto have been duly filed with the California Secretary of State.

2131


California. WABC is the sole shareholder of Westamerica. Westamerica is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Westamerica’s deposits are insured by the FDIC in the manner and to the full extent provided by law.

(d) Compliance With Laws, Regulations and Decrees. Westamerica and each of its subsidiaries (i) has the corporate power to own or lease its properties and to conduct its business as currently conducted, (ii) has complied with, and is not in default of any laws, regulations, ordinances, orders or decrees applicable to the conduct of its business and the ownership of its properties, including but not limited to all federal and state laws (including but not limited to the Bank Secrecy Act), rules and regulations relating to the offer, sale or issuance of securities, and the operation of its subsidiary commercial banks, other than where such noncompliance or default is not likely to result in a material limitation on the conduct of the business of Westamerica or its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or is not likely to otherwise have a material adverse effect on Westamerica, (iii) has not failed to file with the proper federal, state, local or other authorities any material report or other document required to be so filed, (iv) has all material approvals, authorizations, consents, licenses, clearances and orders of, and has currently effective all registrations with, all governmental and regulatory authorities which are necessary in all material respects to the respective businesses and operations of Westamerica and its subsidiaries as they are now being conducted, and (v) has received no notification, formally or informally, from any agency or department of any federal, state or local government or any regulatory agency or the staff thereof (A) asserting that Westamerica or its subsidiaries are not in material compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances which such governmental or regulatory authority enforces, or (B) threatening to revoke any material licenses, franchise, permit or governmental authorization of Westamerica or its subsidiaries.

(e) (b)     Corporate Status and Power of WABC and Westamerica. Prior to and as of the Effective Time, WABC and Westamerica will be corporations duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California and will have the corporate power to enter into the Merger Agreement and to carry out all of the terms and provisions thereof to be carried out by each of them.

(c)     Articles, Bylaws, Books and Records. The copies of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of WABC to be delivered to KSB are complete and accurate copies thereof as in effect on the date hereof. The corporate books and records (including financial statements) of WABC fairly reflect the material transactions to which WABC or any of its subsidiaries is a party or by which any of their properties are subject or bound, and such books and records have been properly kept and maintained. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of WABC and all amendments thereto have been duly approved by all requisite corporate action and said Articles of Incorporation and all amendments thereto have been duly filed with the California Secretary of State.

(d)     Compliance With Laws, Regulations and Decrees. WABC and each of its subsidiaries (i) has the corporate power to own or lease its properties and to conduct its business as currently conducted, (ii) has complied with, and is not in default of any laws, regulations, ordinances, orders or decrees applicable to the conduct of its business and the ownership of its properties, including but not limited to all federal and state laws (including but not limited to the Bank Secrecy Act), rules and regulations relating to the offer, sale or issuance of securities, and the operation of its subsidiary commercial banks, other than where such noncompliance or default is not likely to result in a material limitation on the conduct of the business of WABC or its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or is not likely to otherwise have a material adverse effect on WABC and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, (iii) has not failed to file with the proper federal, state, local or other authorities any material report or other document required to be so filed, (iv) has all material approvals, authorizations, consents, licenses, clearances and orders of, and has currently effective all registrations with, all governmental and regulatory authorities which are necessary in all material respects to the respective businesses and operations of WABC and its subsidiaries as they are now being conducted, and (v) has received no notification, formally or informally, from any agency or department of any federal, state or local government or any regulatory agency or the staff thereof (A) asserting that WABC or its subsidiaries are not in material compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances which such governmental or regulatory authority enforces, or (B) threatening to revoke any material licenses, franchise, permit or governmental authorization of WABC or its subsidiaries.

(e)     Financial Statements. No financial statement or other document provided or to be provided to KSB as required by Section 3.1(d) hereof, as of the date of such document, contained, or as to documents delivered after the date hereof, will contain, any untrue statement of a material fact, or, at the date thereof, omitted or will omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were or will be made, not misleading; provided, however, that information as of a later date shall be deemed to modify information as of any earlier date. Since 1999, WABC has filed all material documents and reports relating to WABC or its subsidiaries required to be filed by it with the FDIC, the FRB, the DFI or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over its business or any of its assets or properties. All such reports conform in all material respects with the requirements promulgated by such regulatory agencies. All compliance or corrective action relating to WABC or its subsidiaries required by governmental authorities and regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over WABC or its subsidiaries has been taken. WABC and its subsidiaries have received no notification, formally or informally, from any agency or department of any federal, state or local government or any regulatory agency or the staff thereof (A) asserting that WABC or any of its subsidiaries are not in material compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances which such governmental or regulatory authority enforces, or (B) threatening to revoke any license, franchise, permit or governmental authorization of WABC or any of its subsidiaries. Neither WABC nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any order, agreement, or written directive with any regulatory authority with respect to its assets or business except for matters of general application. WABC and its subsidiaries have paid all assessments made or imposed by any governmental

22


agency. The financial records of WABC have been, and are being and shall be, maintained in all material respects in accordance with all applicable legal and accounting requirements sufficient to insure that all transactions reflected therein are, in all material respects, executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization and recorded in conformity with GAAP at the time in effect.

(f)     Material Adverse Change. There has been no material adverse change in the financial condition, results of operation or assets of WABC or its subsidiaries from the financial condition, results of operation or assets indicated in the financial statements of WABC at September 30, 2001.

(g)     Execution and Delivery of the Agreement.

      (i) The execution and delivery of this Agreement has been duly and validly authorized by the Boards of Directors of WABCWestamerica and WestamericaWAB and this Agreement will be duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of WABCWestamerica and Westamerica.WAB.
 
      (ii) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by WABCWestamerica and WestamericaWAB and (assuming due execution and delivery by KSB)Redwood Empire and NBR) constitutes a legal and binding obligation of WABCWestamerica and WestamericaWAB (subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and civil laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general applicability).
 
      (iii) The execution and delivery by WABCWestamerica and WestamericaWAB of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions herein contemplated (A) do not and will not violate any provision of the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of WABCWestamerica or Westamerica,WAB, any provision of federal or state law or any governmental rule or regulation (assuming (1) receipt of the Government Approvals, (2) due registration of the WABCWestamerica Shares under the 1933 Act, (3) receipt of appropriate permits or approvals under state securities or “blue sky” laws, and (4) accuracy of the representations of KSBRedwood Empire set forth herein,herein), and (B) do not require any consent of any person under, conflict with or result in a breach of, or accelerate the performance required by any of the terms of, any material debt instrument, lease, license, covenant, agreement or understanding to which WABCWestamerica or WestamericaWAB is a party or by which it is bound or any order, ruling, decree, judgment, arbitration award or stipulation to which WABCWestamerica or WestamericaWAB is subject, or constitute a default thereunder or result in the creation of any lien, claim, security interest, encumbrance, charge, restriction or right of any third party of any kind whatsoever upon any of the properties or assets of WABCWestamerica and Westamerica.WAB.
(f) Securities Law Filings. Since December 31, 1998, Westamerica has filed and will file all documents required to be filed by it under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 and the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, all as amended, and that as of their respective dates, none of these documents contained as of the date of the Agreement or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or omitted or will omit to state material any fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein in light of the circumstances under which they were made or will be made not misleading.
(g) Financial Statements, Regulatory Reports. No financial statement or other document provided or to be provided to Redwood Empire as required by Section 3.1(e) hereof, as of the date of such

(h)     Information in WABC Registration Statement. The information pertaining to WABC and each of its subsidiaries which will appear in the WABC Registration Statement, the Prospectus or the Proxy Statement, in the form filed with the Commission, or in the Applications, will contain no untrue statement of any material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; provided, however, that the information as of a later date shall be deemed to modify information as of an earlier date. All financial statements of WABC included in the Prospectus or the Proxy Statement will present fairly the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of WABC and its consolidated subsidiaries at the dates and for the periods covered by such statements in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the periods covered by such statements. WABC shall promptly (and in any event within two business days) advise KSB in writing if prior to the Effective Time WABC shall obtain knowledge of any facts that would make it necessary to amend the WABC Registration Statement, the Proxy Statement or any Application, or to supplement the Prospectus, in order to make the statements therein not misleading or to comply with applicable law.32

(i)     Accuracy of Representations and Warranties. No representation or warranty by WABC or Westamerica and no statement by WABC or Westamerica in any certificate, agreement, schedule or other document furnished in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Merger Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or omits or will omit to state any material fact necessary to make such representation, warranty or statement not misleading to KSB; provided, however, that information as of a later date shall be deemed to modify information as of an earlier date.


23

document, contained, or as to documents delivered after the date hereof, will contain, any untrue statement of a material fact, or, at the date thereof, omitted or will omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were or will be made, not misleading; provided, however, that information as of a later date shall be deemed to modify information as of any earlier date. Since 2001, Westamerica has filed all material documents and reports relating to Westamerica or its subsidiaries required to be filed by it with the FDIC, the FRB, the DFI or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over its business or any of its assets or properties. All such reports conform in all material respects with the requirements promulgated by such regulatory agencies. All compliance or corrective action relating to Westamerica or its subsidiaries required by governmental authorities and regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over Westamerica or its subsidiaries has been taken. Westamerica and its subsidiaries have received no notification, formally or informally, from any agency or department of any federal, state or local government or any regulatory agency or the staff thereof (A) asserting that Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries are not in material compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances which such governmental or regulatory authority enforces, or (B) threatening to revoke any license, franchise, permit or governmental authorization of Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries. Neither Westamerica nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any order, agreement, or written directive with any regulatory authority with respect to its assets or business except for matters of general application. Westamerica and its subsidiaries have paid all assessments made or imposed by any governmental agency. The financial records of Westamerica have been, and are being and shall be, maintained in all material respects in accordance with all applicable legal and accounting requirements sufficient to insure that all transactions reflected therein are, in all material respects, executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization and recorded in conformity with GAAP at the time in effect.
(h) Community Reinvestment Act. Westamerica has received a rating of “satisfactory” in its most recent examination or interim review with respect to the Community Reinvestment Act. Westamerica has not been advised of any material supervisory concerns regarding its compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act.
(i) Material Adverse Change. Since December 31, 2003, there has been no material adverse change with respect to Westamerica.
(j) Information in Westamerica Registration Statement. The information pertaining to Westamerica and each of its subsidiaries which will appear in the Westamerica Registration Statement, the Prospectus or the Proxy Statement, in the form filed with the Commission, or in the Applications, will contain no untrue statement of any material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; provided, however, that the information as of a later date shall be deemed to modify information as of an earlier date. All financial statements of Westamerica included in the Prospectus or the Proxy Statement will present fairly the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Westamerica and its consolidated subsidiaries at the dates and for the periods covered by such statements in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the periods covered by such statements. Westamerica shall promptly (and in any event within two Business Days) advise Redwood Empire in writing if prior to the Effective Time Westamerica shall obtain knowledge of any facts that would make it necessary to amend the Westamerica Registration Statement, the Proxy Statement or any Application, or to supplement the Prospectus, in order to make the statements therein not misleading or to comply with applicable law.
(k) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties. No representation or warranty by Westamerica or WAB and no statement by Westamerica or WAB in any certificate, agreement, schedule or other document furnished in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Merger Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or omits or will omit to state any material fact necessary to make such representation, warranty or statement not misleading to Redwood Empire; provided, however, that information as of a later date shall be deemed to modify information as of an earlier date.

33


(l)(j)  Employee Benefits.

      (i) WABCWestamerica shall deliver upon request to KSBRedwood Empire an accurate list setting forth all profit sharing, pension, retirement, stock purchase, stock option, deferred compensation, severance, hospitalization, group insurance, death benefits, disability and other fringe benefit plans, trust agreements, arrangements and commitments of WABC,Westamerica, if any, together with copies of plans that are documented.
 
      (ii) Each employee benefit plan (as defined in Sections 3(3) of ERISA) which is listedrequired to be provided in subsection (j)(i)response to this Section 5(l) is in material compliance with the requirements of ERISA.
(m) Compliance With ERISA. Neither Westamerica nor any of its subsidiaries has, since its inception, either maintained or contributed to an employee pension benefit plan, as defined in Section 3(2) of ERISA, including multi-employer plans, other than the Westamerica Bancorporation Tax Deferred Savings/ Retirement Plan (ESOP) and Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (the “Westamerica Plan”). With respect to the Westamerica Plan, as of the Effective Time (i) the form of the Westamerica Plan, to the best of Westamerica’s knowledge, has in all material respects been (and currently is) in compliance with all the requirements of Section 401 or Section 408 of the IRC, as applicable; (ii) Westamerica shall not have amended the Westamerica Plan or administered the Westamerica Plan in a manner inconsistent with such requirements; (iii) no contributions have exceeded the limitations set forth in Section 415 of the IRC; (iv) all required and necessary filings with the IRS, Department of Labor and any other governmental agencies with respect to the Westamerica Plan for all periods ending at or prior to the Effective Time will have been made on a timely basis by Westamerica and the plan administrator; (v) there shall have been no material violation of Parts 1 and 4 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA or of Section 4975 of the IRC; and (vi) there shall have been no action, claim or demand of any kind known to Westamerica brought or threatened by any potential claimant or representative of such claimant under the Westamerica Plan or Trust where Westamerica may be either (A) liable directly on such action, claim or demand, or (B) obligated to indemnify any person, group of persons or entity with respect to such action, claim or demand, unless such action, claim or demand is covered by adequate reserves reflected in Westamerica’s December 31, 2003, financial statements or an insurer of Westamerica has agreed to defend against and pay the amount of any resulting liability without reservation.
(n) Legal Actions and Proceedings. Except as disclosed to Redwood Empire in writing, neither Westamerica nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to, or so far as Westamerica is aware, threatened with, and to its knowledge, there is no reasonable basis for, any legal action or other proceeding or investigation before any court, any arbitrator of any kind or any government agency; and neither Westamerica nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any potential adverse claim, the outcome of which could involve the payment or receipt by Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries of any amount in excess of $5,000,000, unless an insurer of Westamerica has agreed to defend against and pay the amount of any resulting liability without reservation, or, if any such legal action, proceeding, investigation or claim will not involve the payment by Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries of a monetary amount, which could materially adversely affect Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries or its business or property or the transactions contemplated hereby except as disclosed in writing to Redwood Empire. Westamerica has no knowledge of any pending or threatened claims or charges under the Community Reinvestment Act, before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the California Department of Fair Housing & Economic Development, the California Unemployment Appeals Board (except claims or charges in the ordinary course of business that are not expected to have a material adverse effect), or any human relations commission. There is no labor dispute, strike, slow-down or stoppage pending or, to the best of the knowledge of Westamerica, threatened against Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries.
(o) Facts Affecting Government Approvals. To the best knowledge of Westamerica, there is no fact, event or condition applicable to Westamerica or any of its subsidiaries that will, or reasonably could be expected to, adversely affect the likelihood of securing the Government Approvals required to complete the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(k)  Legal Actions and Proceedings.Except as disclosed to KSB in writing, neither WABC nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to, nor so far as any of them is aware, threatened with, and to WABC’s knowledge, there is no reasonable basis for, any legal action or other proceeding or investigation before any court, any arbitrator of any kind or any government agency, and neither WABC nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any potential adverse claim, the outcome of which could involve the payment by WABC or its subsidiaries of any amount in excess of $5,000,000 individually or in the aggregate, unless an insurer of WABC has agreed to defend against and pay the amount of any resulting liability without reservation, or, if any such legal action, proceeding, investigation or claim will not involve the payment by WABC or any of its subsidiaries of a monetary amount, which could materially adversely affect WABC or its business or property or the transactions contemplated hereby. Neither WABC nor any of its subsidiaries has any knowledge of any pending or threatened claims or charges under the Community Reinvestment Act, before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the California Department of Fair Housing & Economic Development, the California Unemployment Appeals board, or any human relations commission. There is no labor dispute, strike, slowdown or stoppage pending or, to the best of the knowledge of WABC, threatened against WABC or any of its subsidiaries.34

(l)  Securities Law Filings. WABC has filed and will file all documents


(p) Taxes. Westamerica has timely filed all federal, state, county, local and foreign tax returns required to be filed by it, and each such return, report or other information was, when filed, complete and accurate in all material respects. Westamerica has paid all taxes, fees and other governmental charges, including any interest and penalties thereon, when they have become due, except those that are being contested in good faith. Westamerica has not been requested to give and has not given any currently effective waivers extending the statutory period of limitation applicable to any tax return required to be filed by it for any period. There are no claims pending against Westamerica for any alleged deficiency in the payment of any taxes, and Westamerica does not know of any pending or threatened audits, investigations or claims for unpaid taxes or relating to any liability in respect of any taxes.
(q) Capitalization. All outstanding shares of Westamerica capital stock have been duly issued and are validly outstanding, fully paid and nonassessable. None of the shares of Westamerica’s capital stock has been issued in violation of the preemptive rights of any person. The shares of Westamerica common stock to be issued in connection with the Merger have been duly authorized and, when issued in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, will be validly issued, fully paid, nonassessable and free and clear of any preemptive rights.
(r) Internal Controls. Westamerica has (a) designed disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the 1934 Act) to ensure that information relating to it that is required to be disclosed in its reports under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and presented in its periodic reports most recently filed with the Commission the conclusions of its senior officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by such report based on that evaluation; and (c) disclosed in such report any change in its internal control over financial reporting that occurred during its most recent reporting period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting. Westamerica has disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to its auditors and the audit committee of its board of directors: (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect its ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Westamerica’s internal control over financial reporting.

6.Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 and the Trust Indentures Act of 1939, all as amended, and that as of their respective dates, none of these documents contained as of the date of the Agreement or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or omitted or will omit to state material any fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein in light of the circumstances under which they were made or will be made not misleading.

(m)  Taxes. WABC has timely filed all federal, state, county, local and foreign tax returns required to be filed by it, and each such return, report or other information was, when filed, complete and accurate in all material respects. WABC has paid all taxes, fees and other governmental charges, including any interest and penalties thereon, when they have become due, except those that are being contested in good faith. WABC has not been requested to give and has not given any currently effective waivers extending the statutory period of limitation applicable to any tax return required to be filed by it for any period. There are no claims pending against WABC for any alleged deficiency in the payment of any taxes, and WABC does not know of any pending or threatened audits, investigations or claims for unpaid taxes or relating to any liability in respect of any taxes.

6.  SECURITIES ACT OF 1933.

     (a) Preparation and Filing of Registration Statement.WABC Westamerica shall as promptly as reasonably practicable after the date of this Agreement prepare and file with the Commission (i) a registration statement on the appropriate form (the “WABC“Westamerica Registration Statement”) under and pursuant to the provisions of the 1933 Act for the purpose of registering the WABCWestamerica Shares and, (ii) shall prepare and file, as soon as practicable, one or more registration statements or amendments to existing registration statements under the 1933 Act for the purpose of registering the maximum number of shares of common stock of WABCWestamerica to which the option holders of KSBRedwood Empire may be entitled pursuant to Section 2.6 above at or after the Effective Date. WABCWestamerica and KSBRedwood Empire shall promptly prepare the Proxy Statement for the purpose of submitting this Agreement and the Merger to the shareholders of KSBRedwood Empire for approval. KSBRedwood Empire shall cooperate in all reasonable respects with regard to the preparation of the Proxy Statement. The Proxy Statement in definitive form is expected toshall serve as the prospectus (the “Prospectus”)

24


to be included in the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement. WABCWestamerica and KSBRedwood Empire shall each provide promptly to the other such information concerning its business and financial condition and affairs as may be required or appropriate for inclusion in the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement, the Prospectus or the Proxy Statement, and shall cause its counsel and auditors to cooperate with the other’s counsel and auditors in the preparation of the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement, the Prospectus and the Proxy Statement.

     (b) Effectiveness of Registration Statement.WABC Westamerica and KSBRedwood Empire shall use their commercially reasonable best efforts to have the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement and any amendments or

35


supplements thereto declared effective by the Commission under the 1933 Act as soon as practicable, and thereafter KSBRedwood Empire shall distribute at its cost the Proxy Statement to holders of its common stock in accordance with applicable laws and its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. KSB shall not mail or otherwise furnish the Proxy Statement to its shareholders unless and until WABC shall have received a written assurance from Moss Adams dated no more than two business days prior to the effective date of the WABC Registration Statement as provided in Section 3.2(f)(iv) of this Agreement.

     (c) Sales and Resales of Common Stock.WABC Westamerica shall not be required to maintain the effectiveness of the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement for the purpose of sale or resale of the WABCWestamerica Shares by any person.

     (d) Rule 145.Securities representing WABCWestamerica Shares issued to affiliates of KSBRedwood Empire (as determined by counsel to WABC)Westamerica) under Rule 145 of the rules and regulations under the 1933 Act pursuant to the Merger Agreement may be subject to stop transfer orders and may bear a restrictive legend in substantially the following form:

 The security represented by this instrument has been issued or transferred to the registered holder as the result of a transaction to which Rule 145 under the 1933 Act applies. The security represented by this instrument may not be sold, hypothecated, transferred or assigned, and the issuer shall not be required to give effect to any attempted sale, hypothecation, transfer or assignment, except (i) pursuant to a then current effective registration under the 1933 Act, or (ii) in a transaction which, in the opinion of counsel satisfactory to the issuer, is not required to be registered under the 1933 Act.

Should any opinion of counsel described in clause (ii) of the foregoing legend indicate that the legend and any stop transfer order then in effect with respect to the shares may be removed, WABCWestamerica will upon request substitute unlegended securities and remove any stop transfer orders.

7.  CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF WABC.(e) Blue Sky Compliance. Westamerica agrees to use its commercially reasonable efforts to have the shares of Westamerica common stock to be issued in connection with the Merger qualified or registered for offer and sale, to the extent required if any, under the securities laws of each jurisdiction in which shareholders of Redwood Empire reside.

7.Conditions to the Obligations of Westamerica.

     The obligations of WABCWestamerica under this Agreement are, at its option, subject to fulfillment at or prior to the Effective Date of each of the following conditions; provided, however, that any one or more of such conditions, other than those set forth in subsection (d), (g), (h) or (i) below, may be waived by the Board of Directors of WABCWestamerica at any time at or prior to the Effective Time:

     (a) Representations and Warranties.The representations and warranties of KSB in Section 4 hereof shall be true and correct in all material respects on the date hereof and as of the Effective Date, with the same effect as though such representations and warranties had been made on and as of such date except as to any representation or warranty which specifically relates to a specified date and not contain any material inaccuracies or omissions, the circumstances as to which, either individually or in the aggregate have, or reasonably could be expected to have, a material adverse effect on KSB. The representations and warranties of Redwood Empire in Section 4 hereof shall be true and correct in all material respects on the date hereof and as of the Effective Date, with the same effect as though such representations and warranties had been made on and as of such date (except to the extent that any representation or warranty speaks as of a specified date and except for changes expressly contemplated by this Agreement) and not contain any material inaccuracies or omissions, the circumstances as to which, either individually or in the aggregate have, or reasonably could be expected to have, a material adverse effect on Redwood Empire.
(b) Compliance and Performance Under Agreement. Redwood Empire shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all terms of this Agreement required to be performed or complied with by it at or prior to the Effective Date. Each of the directors of Redwood Empire also shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all of the terms and conditions of the undertaking referred to in Section 3.2(a) above.
(c) Material Adverse Change; Litigation. No material adverse change shall have occurred since December 31, 2003, with respect to Redwood Empire (whether or not in the Ordinary Course of Business) and neither Redwood Empire nor any of its subsidiaries shall be a party to or, so far as Redwood Empire is aware, threatened with, and to Redwood Empire’s knowledge there is no reasonable basis for, any legal action or other proceeding before any court, any arbitrator of any kind or any government agency that, in the reasonable judgment of Westamerica, is reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on Redwood Empire.

(b)  Compliance and Performance Under Agreement.KSB shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all terms of this Agreement required to be performed or complied with by them at or prior to the Effective Date. Each of the directors of KSB also shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all of the terms and conditions of the undertaking referred to in Section 3.2(a) above. KSB acknowledges that its failure to obtain WABC’s prior written approval for any material transaction pursuant to this Agreement and not in the Ordinary Course of Business shall be within the scope of this paragraph.

2536


(c)  Material Adverse Change.No materially adverse change shall have occurred since September 30, 2001, in the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of KSB and KSB shall not be a party to or, so far as KSB is aware, threatened with, and to KSB’s knowledge there is no reasonable basis for, any legal action or other proceeding before any court, any arbitrator of any kind or any government agency if, in the reasonable judgment of WABC, such legal action or proceeding could materially adversely affect KSB, or their business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects taken as a whole. Without limitation, the following shall constitute a materially adverse change: (i) the existence of Significant Liabilities of $925,000 or more or (ii) any material adverse difference between KSB’s call report for the period ended December 31, 2001, which has been provided to WABC, and KSB’s audited financial statements, including footnotes, for the year ended December 31, 2001, which have not been prepared as of the date of this Agreement, unless such change has been previously disclosed in writing to WABC before the date of this Agreement..

(d)  Approval of Agreement.This Agreement and the Merger shall have been duly approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of KSB common stock at the meeting of shareholders duly called and held after distributing the Proxy Statement to all shareholders entitled to vote at such meeting as required by Section 6 hereof.

(e)  Officer’s Certificate.WABC shall have received a certificate, dated the Effective Date, signed on behalf of KSB by its President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer to the effect that the conditions in Sections 7(a)-(d) have been satisfied.

(f)  Opinion of Counsel.KSB shall have delivered to WABC such documents as may reasonably be requested by WABC to evidence compliance by KSB with the provisions of this Agreement including an opinion of its counsel in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit E.

(g)  Absence of Legal Impediment.No legal impediment to the Merger shall have arisen in the reasonable opinion of WABC and no litigation, proceeding or investigation shall be pending or threatened before any court or government agency relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement which affords a material basis, in the reasonable opinion of WABC, for a determination that it would be inadvisable or inexpedient to continue to carry out the terms of, or to attempt to consummate the transactions contemplated by, this Agreement.

(h)  Effectiveness of Registration Statement.The WABC Registration Statement and any amendments or supplements thereto shall have become effective under the 1933 Act, no stop order suspending the effectiveness of such Registration Statement shall be in effect and no proceedings for such purpose shall have been initiated or threatened by or before the Commission. All state securities and “blue sky” permits or approvals required to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall have been received and remain in effect.

(i)  Government Approvals.All Government Approvals shall be in effect, and all conditions or requirements prescribed by law or by any Government Approval shall have been satisfied; provided, however, that no Government Approval shall be deemed to have been received if it shall require the divestiture or cessation of any of the present businesses or operations conducted by any of the parties hereto or shall impose any other condition or requirement, which divestiture, cessation, condition or requirement WABC, in its reasonable judgment, shall deem to be materially burdensome (in which case WABC shall promptly notify KSB). For purposes of this Agreement no condition shall be deemed to be “materially burdensome” if such condition does not materially differ from conditions regularly imposed by the FRB or the DFI in orders approving transactions of the type contemplated by this Agreement and compliance with such condition would not (A) require the taking of any action inconsistent with the manner in which WABC or KSB has conducted its business previously, (B) have a material adverse effect upon the business, financial condition or results of operations of WABC or KSB, or (C) preclude satisfaction of any of the conditions to consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(j)  Tax Opinion or Ruling.WABC and KSB shall have received either a ruling from the IRS under federal income tax law and an equivalent ruling from the California Franchise Tax board, or, to the

26


extent such rulings have not been received on or before the Effective Date, an opinion of WABC’s counsel or independent accountants, subject to assumptions and exceptions normally included, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to WABC and its counsel, substantially to the effect that under federal income tax law and California income and franchise tax law:
(d) Approval of Agreement. This Agreement and the Mergers shall have been duly approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Redwood Empire common stock at the meeting of shareholders duly called and held after distributing the Proxy Statement to all shareholders entitled to vote at such meeting as required by Section 6 hereof.
(e) Officer’s Certificate. Westamerica shall have received a certificate, dated the Effective Date, signed on behalf of Redwood Empire by its President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer to the effect that the conditions in Sections 7(a)-(d) have been satisfied.
(f) Opinion of Counsel. Redwood Empire shall have delivered to Westamerica an opinion of its counsel in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit E.
(g) Absence of Legal Impediment. No temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation of the Merger shall be in effect. There shall not be any action taken, or any statute, rule, regulation or order enacted, entered, enforced or deemed applicable to the Merger, by any governmental authority of competent jurisdiction which makes the consummation of the Merger or the Bank Merger illegal.
(h) Effectiveness of Registration Statement. The Westamerica Registration Statement and any amendments or supplements thereto shall have become effective under the 1933 Act, no stop order suspending the effectiveness of such Registration Statement shall be in effect and no proceedings for such purpose shall have been initiated or threatened by or before the Commission.
(i) Government Approvals. All Government Approvals shall be in effect, and all conditions or requirements prescribed by law or by any Government Approval shall have been satisfied; provided, however, that no Government Approval shall be deemed to have been received if it, or any other action taken after the date of this Agreement, or any statute, rule, regulation, order or decree enacted, entered, enforced or deemed applicable to the Merger, the Bank Merger or other related agreements by any federal or state governmental entity arising after the date of this Agreement, shall impose any condition or requirement that Westamerica, in its reasonable and good faith judgment, deems to be materially burdensome (in which case Westamerica shall promptly notify Redwood Empire); provided that Westamerica shall be required to use commercially reasonable efforts to remove such materially burdensome condition. For purposes of this Agreement, no condition shall be deemed to be “materially burdensome” if such condition does not materially differ from conditions generally imposed by the FRB or the DFI in orders approving transactions of the type contemplated by this Agreement and it does not (A) require the divestiture or cessation of any of the present businesses or operations conducted by Westamerica or Redwood Empire, (B) require the taking of any action inconsistent with the manner in which Westamerica or Redwood Empire has conducted its business previously, (C) have or is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Westamerica or Redwood Empire, (D) preclude satisfaction of any of the conditions to consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or (E) prevent Westamerica or WAB from realizing any substantial portion of the economic benefits of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; provided, a requirement to divest deposits of either NBR or WAB in Lake County, California (a “Lake County Divestiture”), shall result in the adjustment of the Merger Consideration as provided in Section 2.1(c) and shall not be deemed “materially burdensome” for purposes of this section.
(j) Tax Opinion. Westamerica shall have received an opinion of its counsel, subject to assumptions and exceptions normally included, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Westamerica, substantially to the effect that under federal income tax law and California income and franchise tax law:

      (i) The Merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the IRC;
 
      (ii) WABCWestamerica and KSBRedwood Empire will each be a party to such reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the IRC;

37


     (iii) The Merger will not result in any recognized gain or loss to Westamerica or Redwood Empire;
     (iv) Except for the Cash Portion of the Merger Consideration and any cash received in lieu of any fractional share, no gain or loss will be recognized by holders of Redwood Empire Shares who receive Westamerica Shares in exchange for the Redwood Empire Shares which they hold;
     (v) The holding period of Westamerica Shares exchanged for Redwood Empire Shares will include the holding period of the Redwood Empire Shares for which the Westamerica Shares are exchanged, assuming the Redwood Empire Shares are capital assets in the hands of the holder thereof at the Effective Date; and
     (vi) The basis of the Westamerica Shares received in the exchange will be the same as the basis of the Redwood Empire Shares for which the Westamerica Shares are exchanged, decreased by the amount of any cash received and increased by the amount of any gain recognized on the exchange.

     The issuance of such opinion shall be conditioned on the receipt of tax representation letters from Westamerica and Redwood Empire, which letters shall be in such form and substance as may reasonably be required by the recipient’s counsel. Each such tax representation letter shall be dated on or before the date of such opinion and shall not have been withdrawn or modified in any material respect as of the date of such opinion.
(k) Accountant’s Assurance. Westamerica shall have received the written assurance from Crowe Chizek and Company LLC prepared pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.2(f)(v).
(l) Dissenting Shares. The aggregate number of shares of Redwood Empire common stock held by persons who have taken all of the steps required at or prior to the intended closing to perfect their right (if any) to be paid the value of such shares under the GCL shall not exceed 9% of the outstanding shares of Redwood Empire common stock.
(m) Unaudited Financials. Not later than five Business Days prior to the Effective Date (and, if applicable, by the earlier date specified in clause (ii) of the final paragraph of Article 7), Redwood Empire shall have furnished Westamerica a copy of its most recently prepared unaudited year-to-date consolidated financial statements, including a balance sheet and year-to-date statement of income, each prepared in accordance with GAAP and the requirements of this Agreement; provided, that such financial statements shall not be required to include the footnotes that would be required for such financial statements to comply fully with GAAP. At least seven Business Days prior to the Effective Date, all attorneys, accountants, investment bankers and other advisors and agents for Redwood Empire shall have submitted to Redwood Empire (with a copy to Westamerica) estimates of their fees and expenses for all services rendered or to be rendered in any respect in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby to the extent not already paid, and based on such estimates, Redwood Empire shall have prepared and submitted to Westamerica a summary of such fees and expenses for the transaction which shall be reflected in the foregoing financial statement. At the Effective Time, (i) such advisors shall have submitted their final bills for such fees and expenses to Redwood Empire for services rendered, with a copy to be delivered to Westamerica, and based on such summary, Redwood Empire shall have prepared and submitted to Westamerica a final calculation of such fees and expenses, (ii) Redwood Empire shall have accrued and paid the amount of such fees and expenses as calculated above after Westamerica has been given an opportunity to review all such bills and calculation of such fees and expenses, and (iii) such advisors shall have released Westamerica from liability for any fees and expenses.
(n) Affiliates’ Letter. No later than 30 calendar days after the date of execution of this Agreement (and at the date of mailing of the Proxy Statement to the shareholders of Redwood Empire for persons not previously deemed an affiliate for this purpose), Westamerica shall have received from each person who, in the opinion of Westamerica’s counsel, might be deemed to be an affiliate of Redwood Empire or

38


Westamerica under Rule 144 or 145, a signed undertaking substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C.
(o) Shareholders’ Equity. The Shareholders’ Equity of Redwood Empire as of the SAS 100 Date or, if applicable, the earlier date specified in clause (ii) of the final paragraph of Article 7 shall be not less than the sum of: (i) $23,531,400 (after deduction of actual and estimated Merger-related expenses, net of the related tax benefit, including Merger-related expenses that are assumed by Westamerica and not actually paid by Redwood Empire, all as disclosed in Section 7(o) of the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule) and (ii) $515,000 for each complete calendar month (prorated for a final partial month) from May 31, 2004, through the Effective Date, but reduced in any month by the amount of cash dividends permitted by this Agreement (“Minimum Shareholders’ Equity”). “Shareholders’ Equity” for purposes of this Section 7(o) means shareholders’ equity determined in accordance with GAAP and as required by this Agreement, but excluding any revaluation at any time of securities available for sale and reduced by an amount equal to all of Redwood Empire’s actual and anticipated Merger-related expenses to the extent not previously paid or accrued as contemplated by subsection (m) above and any cash shortfall identified by the cash reconciliation described in Section 3.2(v), in each case after adjustment for any related tax benefit. In addition, it is agreed that amounts payable to employees of Redwood Empire or its subsidiaries who are terminated at or after the Effective Time, under the Redwood Empire Change of Control Compensation Policy, shall be disregarded in determining “Shareholders’ Equity” for purposes of this Section 7(o).
(p) Loans and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits. As of the SAS 100 Date and as of the Effective Time or, if applicable, the earlier date specified in clause (ii) of the final paragraph of Article 7, the outstanding principal balance of all of Redwood Empire’s Performing Loans shall equal or exceed $400,000,000. For the 30-day period ending on the SAS 100 Date and the 30-day period ending three days before the Effective Date or, if applicable, the earlier date specified in clause (ii) of the final paragraph of Article 7, the average total balance of all noninterest-bearing deposit accounts maintained with Redwood Empire shall equal or exceed $100,000,000.
(q) Consents. Redwood Empire shall have received, or Westamerica shall have satisfied itself that Redwood Empire will receive, all consents of other parties to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement that are required by material mortgages, notes, leases, franchises, agreements, licenses and permits applicable to Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries, in each case in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Westamerica, and no such consent or license or permit shall have been withdrawn or suspended; provided, however, that Redwood Empire shall not be required to obtain any such consents where the failure to obtain such consents would not or would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Redwood Empire or Westamerica or that would not or would not reasonably be expected to prevent Westamerica from realizing any substantial portion of the economic benefits of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(r) Support Undertakings. Westamerica shall have received the undertakings in the form of Exhibits B and B-1 required from each Redwood Empire director and each of the specified shareholders of Redwood Empire as required by Section 3.2(a).
(s) Regulatory Examination. Prior to the Effective Date, Redwood Empire shall be in material compliance with all requirements arising from its most recent safety and soundness examination.
(t) Noncompetition/Nonsolicitation Agreements. Within 30 calendar days of the execution of this Agreement, Westamerica shall have received an executed Confidentiality and Nonsolicitation Agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit D or a Noncompetition Agreement in substantially the form of Exhibit D-1 from each director of Redwood Empire.
     Notwithstanding the foregoing, if

     (i) Westamerica elects to defer the Effective Time until the first Business Day of February 2005 or later pursuant to Section 9(a) of this Agreement, and

39


     (ii) the requirements of Sections 7(o) and (p) have been satisfied as of a date that is at least five (5) days after the later of (A) receipt of the last Government Approval, and (B) expiration of the last waiting period related to any Government Approval, and
     (iii) as of the date described in clause (ii) above, Westamerica has received either a Confidentiality and Nonsolicitation Agreement or a Noncompetition Agreement from each director of Redwood Empire; the conditions in Sections 7(c) (absence of material adverse change or litigation), 7(d) (receipt of shareholder approval), 7(k) (accountant’s assurance, but as of the date described in clause (ii) above rather than two Business Days before the Closing Date as specified in Section 3.2(f)(v)) and 7(q) (third party consents) are also satisfied as of such date; and neither Redwood Empire nor NBR is in material default of any of its obligations under this Agreement or any related agreements as of such date,

then the requirements of Sections 7(o) and (p) shall be deemed satisfied thereafter.

8.Conditions to the Obligations of Redwood Empire and NBR.

     The obligations of Redwood Empire and NBR under this Agreement are, at their option, subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the Effective Time of each of the following conditions provided, however, that any one or more of such conditions, other than those set forth in subsection (e), (g), (h) or (i) below, may be waived by the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire at any time at or prior to the Effective Time:

(a) Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties of Westamerica and WAB in Section 5 hereof shall be true and correct in all material respects on the date hereof and as of the Effective Date with the same effect as though such representations and warranties had been made on and as of such date except as to any representation or warranty which specifically related to an earlier date.
(b) Compliance and Performance Under Agreement. Westamerica and WAB shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all of the terms of this Agreement required to be performed or complied with by them at or prior to the Effective Time.
(c) Material Adverse Change; Litigation. No material adverse change shall have occurred since December 31, 2003, with respect to Westamerica, and Westamerica shall not be engaged in, or a party to or so far as Westamerica is aware, threatened with, and to Westamerica’s knowledge no grounds shall exist for, any legal action or other proceeding before any court, any arbitrator of any kind or any government agency that, in the reasonable judgment of Redwood Empire, such legal action or proceeding is reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on Westamerica.
(d) Officer’s Certificate. Redwood Empire shall have received a certificate, dated the Effective Date, signed on behalf of Westamerica by its Chief Financial Officer, certifying to the fulfillment of the conditions stated in Sections 8(a)-(c) hereof.
(e) Approval of Agreement. This Agreement and the Merger shall have been duly approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Redwood Empire common stock at a meeting of shareholders duly called and held.
(f) Opinion of Counsel. Westamerica shall have delivered to Redwood Empire an opinion of its counsel in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit F.
(g) Effectiveness of Registration Statement. The Westamerica Registration Statement and any amendments or supplements thereto shall have become effective under the 1933 Act. No stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Westamerica Registration Statement shall be in effect and no proceedings for such purpose shall have been initiated or threatened by or before the Commission.
(h) Government Approvals. The Government Approvals shall have been received and shall be in effect, and all conditions or requirements prescribed by law or by any such approval shall have been satisfied.

40


(i) Tax Opinion. Redwood Empire shall have received an opinion of its counsel, subject to assumptions and exceptions normally included, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Redwood Empire, substantially to the effect that under federal income tax law and California income and franchise tax law:

     (i) The Merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the IRC;
     (ii) Westamerica and Redwood Empire will each be a party to such reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the IRC;
 
      (iii) The Merger will not result in any recognized gain or loss to WABCWestamerica or KSB.Redwood Empire;
 
      (iv) Except for the Cash Portion of the Merger Consideration and any cash received in lieu of any fractional share, no gain or loss will be recognized by holders of KSBRedwood Empire Shares who receive WABCWestamerica Shares in exchange for the KSBRedwood Empire Shares which they hold;
 
      (v) The holding period of WABCWestamerica Shares exchanged for KSBRedwood Empire Shares will include the holding period of the KSBRedwood Empire Shares for which it isthe Westamerica Shares are exchanged, assuming the shares of KSBRedwood Empire Shares are capital assets in the hands of the holder thereof at the Effective Date; and
 
      (vi) The basis of the WABCWestamerica Shares received in the exchange will be the same as the basis of the KSBRedwood Empire Shares for which it wasthe Westamerica Shares are exchanged, lessdecreased by the amount of any basis attributable to fractional shares for which cash is received.received and increased by the amount of any gain recognized on the exchange.

The issuance of such opinion shall be conditioned on the receipt of tax representation letters from WABC and KSB, which letters shall be in such form and substance as may reasonably be required by WABC’s counsel. Each such tax representation letter shall be dated on or before the date of such opinion and shall not have been withdrawn or modified in any material respect as of the date of such opinion.

(k)  Accountant’s Assurance.WABC shall have received the written assurance from Moss Adams prepared pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.2(f)(iv).

(l)  Dissenting Shares.The aggregate number of shares of KSB common stock held by persons who have taken all of the steps required at or prior to the intended closing to perfect their right (if any) to be paid the value of such shares under the GCL (“Dissenting Shares”) shall not exceed 9% of the outstanding shares of KSB common stock.

(m)  Unaudited Financials.Not later than five business days prior to the Effective Date, KSB shall have furnished WABC a copy of its most recently prepared unaudited year-to-date consolidated financial statements, including a balance sheet and year-to-date statement of income, each prepared in accordance with GAAP and the requirements of this Agreement. At least ten business days prior to the Effective Date, all attorneys, accountants, investment bankers and other advisors and agents for KSB shall have submitted to KSB (with a copy to WABC) estimates of their fees and expenses for all services rendered in any respect in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby to the extent not already paid, and based on such estimates, KSB shall have prepared and submitted to WABC a summary of such fees and expenses for the transaction which shall be reflected in the foregoing financial statement. At the Effective Time, (i) such advisors shall have submitted their final bills for such fees and expenses to KSB for services rendered, with a copy to be delivered to WABC, and based on such summary, KSB shall have prepared and submitted to WABC a final calculation of such fees and expenses, (ii) KSB shall have accrued and paid the amount of such fees and expenses as calculated above after WABC has been given an opportunity to review all such bills and calculation of such fees and expenses, and (iii) such advisors shall have released WABC from liability for any fees and expenses.

(n)  Rule 145 Undertaking.No person who is deemed by counsel to WABC to be an affiliate of KSB under Rule 145 of the regulations promulgated by the Commission under the 1933 Act will offer, sell or

27


transfer any WABC Shares to be received pursuant to the Merger, except that each such person may offer, sell or transfer such WABC shares:

      (i) pursuant to a then-current effective registration underThe issuance of such opinion shall be conditioned on the 1933 Act;receipt of tax representation letters from Westamerica and Redwood Empire, which letters shall be in such form and substance as may reasonably be required by the recipient’s counsel. Each such tax representation letter shall be dated on or before the date of such opinion and shall not have been withdrawn or modified in any material respect as of the date of such opinion.
 
      (ii)(j) Absence of Legal Impediment. No temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation of the Merger shall be in effect. There shall not be any action taken, or any statute, rule, regulation or order enacted, entered, enforced or deemed applicable to the Merger, by any governmental authority of competent jurisdiction which makes the consummation of the Merger illegal.
(k) Fairness Opinion. As of the date of this Agreement, Redwood Empire shall have received a transactionfairness opinion commissioned by Redwood Empire’s Board of Directors which inshall provide that the opinionterms of counsel satisfactorythe Merger, from a financial standpoint, are fair to WABC, is not required to be registered under the 1933 Act.shareholders of Redwood Empire.

WABC shall have received at least 30 days prior to the Effective Date from each person who, in the opinion of WABC’s counsel, might be deemed to be an affiliate of KSB or WABC under Rule 144 or 145, a signed undertaking substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, that such person will sell or transfer such shares only in compliance with the terms of the preceding paragraph of this Section 7(n).

(o)  Shareholders’ Equity. Shareholders’ Equity of KSB as of the SAS 71 Date shall be not less than $10,161,000. “Shareholders’ Equity” for purposes of this Section 7(o) means shareholders’ equity determined in accordance with GAAP and as required by this Agreement, but reduced by an amount equal to all of KSB’s actual and anticipated merger-related expenses to the extent not previously paid or accrued as contemplated by subsection (m) above.

(p)  Loans and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits. As of the SAS 71 Date and as of the Effective Time, the outstanding principal balance of all of KSB’s Performing Loans shall equal or exceed $52,000,000. For the 30-day period ending on the SAS 71 Date and the 30-day period ending three days before the Effective Date, the average total balance of all noninterest-bearing deposit accounts maintained with KSB shall equal or exceed $13,800,000.

(q)     Significant Liabilities. KSB’s Significant Liabilities shall not exceed $925,000.

(r)     Closing Documents. WABC shall have received such certificates and other closing documents as counsel for WABC shall reasonably request.

(s)     Consents. KSB shall have received, or WABC shall have satisfied itself that KSB will receive, all consents of other parties to and required by material mortgages, notes, leases, franchises, agreements, licenses and permits applicable to KSB, in each case in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to WABC, and no such consent or license or permit shall have been withdrawn or suspended.

(t)     Losses in Investment and Loan Portfolios. At and as of the Effective Date, losses actually realized by KSB from the sale of securities held in KSB’s investment portfolios after September 30, 2001, and prior to the Effective Date shall be reflected in the financial statements of KSB as of the SAS 71 Date. Additionally, the aggregate amount of loans on the books of KSB which are classified by any bank examiner, KSB or WABC or any loan review consultant engaged by KSB or WABC for the purpose of examining loans (using standard banking practice) as “Loss” shall have been charged off in the financial statements of KSB as of the SAS 71 Date.

(u)     Satisfaction of Spending or Other Commitments. There shall have been no failure by KSB to perform the obligations or satisfy the conditions set forth in Sections 2.6, 3.2(d) and 3.2(h)(ii) of this Agreement and the undertakings required from each KSB director pursuant to Section 3.2(a) shall have been delivered within 15 business days after the execution and delivery of this Agreement.

(v)     Compliance Examinations. Prior to the Effective Date, KSB shall have taken all corrective action recommended by or resulting from its most recent compliance examinations and any significant regulatory compliance violations shall have been corrected by KSB prior to the Effective Date.

(w)     Opinion of Loan Review Examiner. KSB shall use its best efforts to have delivered to WABC an opinion of its loan review examiner, which opinion shall be acceptable to WABC and be to the effect that all loan losses in excess of $25,000 have been identified with respect to loans and related assets on the books of KSB and its subsidiaries. KSB shall also use its best efforts to have said opinion dated as of a date no earlier than four months preceding the Effective Date.

28


(x)     Regulatory Examination. Prior to the Effective Date, KSB shall be in compliance with all requirements arising from its most recent safety and soundness examination.

(y)     Noncompetition Agreements. Within 15 business days of the execution of this Agreement, WABC shall have received executed noncompetition agreements substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D from each director of KSB.

(z)     Resignation of Directors. At least three days prior to Closing, WABC shall have received a letter from each director of KSB tendering his or her resignation from the Board of Directors effective at the Effective Time.

8.     CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF KSB.

     The obligations of KSB under this Agreement are, at its option, subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the Effective Time of each of the following conditions provided, however, that any one or more of such conditions may be waived by the Board of Directors of KSB at any time at or prior to the Effective Time:

9.Closing.

     (a) Representations and Warranties.Closing Date.The representations and warrantiesclosing of WABC and Westamerica in Section 5 hereof shall be true and correct in all material respects on the date hereof and as of the Effective Date with the same effect as though such representations and warranties had been made on and as of such date except as to any representation or warranty which specifically related to an earlier date.

(b)     Compliance and Performance Under Agreement.WABC shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all of the terms of this Agreement required to be performed or complied with by them at or prior to the Effective Time.

(c)     Material Adverse Change.No materially adverse change shall have occurred since September 30, 2001, in the business, financial condition, results of operations or properties of WABC and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, and WABC shall not be engaged in, or a party to or so far as WABC is aware, threatened with, and to WABC’s knowledge no grounds shall exist for, any legal action or other proceeding before any court, any arbitrator of any kind or any government agency if, in the reasonable judgment of KSB, such legal action or proceeding could materially adversely affect WABC or its business, financial condition, results of operations or assets.

(d)     Officer’s Certificate.KSB shall have received a certificate, dated the Effective Date, signed on behalf of WABC by its Chief Financial Officer, certifying to the fulfillment of the conditions stated in Sections 8(a)-(c) hereof.

(e)     Approval of Agreement.This Agreement and the Merger shall have been duly approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of KSB common stock at a meeting of shareholders duly called and held.

(f)     Opinion of Counsel.WABC shall have delivered to KSB such documents as may reasonably be requested by KSB to evidence compliance by WABC with the provisions of this Agreement including an opinion of its counsel in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit F.

(g)     Effectiveness of Registration Statement.The WABC Registration Statement and any amendments or supplements thereto shall have become effective under the 1933 Act. No stop order suspending the effectiveness of the WABC Registration Statement shall be in effect and no proceedings for such purpose shall have been initiated or threatened by or before the Commission. All state securities and “blue sky” permits or approvals required to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the “Closing”) shall occur on an agreed date no later than five Business Days after satisfaction or waiver (subject to applicable law) of all the conditions (other than conditions that, by their terms, cannot be satisfied until the Closing) set forth in Articles 7 and the Merger Agreement shall have been received and remain8; provided that a Closing that would otherwise occur in effect.

(h)     Government Approvals.The Government Approvals shall have been received andDecember 2004 or January 2005 shall be in effect, and all conditions or requirements prescribeddeferred, if Westamerica so elects by law or by any such approval shall have been satisfied.

(i)     Tax Opinion or Ruling.WABC and KSB shall have receivedwritten notice to Redwood Empire given at least four Business Days before the opinions or tax rulings referred to in Section 7(j) hereofdate on which opinions or rulings shall meet the requirementsClosing would otherwise occur, until the first Business Day of such Section.

29


(j)February 2005. The Closing Documents.KSB shall have received such certificates and other closing documents as counsel for KSB shall reasonably request.

(k)     Absence of Legal Impediment.No legal impediment to the Merger shall have arisen in the reasonable opinion of KSB and no litigation, proceeding or investigation shall be pending or threatened before any court or government agency relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement which affords a material basis, in the reasonable opinion of KSB, for a determination that it would be inadvisable or inexpedient to continue to carry out the terms of, or to attempt to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(l)     Fairness Opinion.KSB shall have received a fairness opinion commissioned by KSB’s Board of Directors which shall provide that the terms of the Merger, from a financial standpoint, are fair to the shareholders of KSB, and such fairness opinion shall not have been revoked at any time prior to the mailing of the Proxy Statement to KSB’s shareholders.

(m)     Aggregate Merger Consideration.The aggregate consideration payable to KSB shareholders, consisting of the Final Exchange Ratio multiplied by the number of shares of KSB common stock determined on a fully diluted basis, shall be not less than $12,500,000.

(n)     Allowance for Loan Losses.KSB’s allowance for loan losses, determined under WABC’s methodology for determining the allowance, would not be greater than $3,900,000 as of the Effective Time.

9.     CLOSING.

(a)     Closing Date.The closing (the “Closing”) shall, unless another date, time or place is agreed to in writing by WABCWestamerica and KSB,Redwood Empire, be held at the offices of Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen,LLP, Three Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, California, on the Effective Date.

41


     (b) Delivery of Documents.At the Closing, the opinions, certificates and other documents required to be delivered by this Agreement shall be delivered.

     (c) Filings.At the Closing, WABCWestamerica and KSBRedwood Empire shall instruct their respective representatives to make or confirm such filings as shall be required in the opinion of counsel to WABCWestamerica and KSBRedwood Empire to give effect to the Merger.

10.     [RESERVED].

11.     EXPENSES.

Expenses.

     Except as provided in Section 12,11, each party hereto agrees to pay, without right of reimbursement from the other party and whether or not the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Merger Agreement shall be consummated, the costs incurred by such party incident to the performance of its obligations under this Agreement and the Merger Agreement, including without limitation, costs incident to the preparation of this Agreement, the WABCWestamerica Registration Statement, Prospectus and the Proxy Statement (including the audited financial statements of the parties contained or incorporated by reference therein) and incident to the consummation of the Merger and of the other transactions contemplated herein and in the Merger Agreement, including the fees and disbursements of counsel, accountants, consultants and financial advisers employed by such party in connection therewith. Notwithstanding the foregoing, WABCWestamerica shall be solely responsible for all fees payable pursuant to state “blue-sky” securities laws fees related to obtaining a revenue ruling or tax opinion and the fee required to be paid to the Commission to register the WABCWestamerica Shares. KSBRedwood Empire shall bear its own costs of distributing the Proxy Statement and other information relating to these transactions to its shareholders.

12.     AMENDMENT; TERMINATION.

11.Amendment; Termination.

     (a) Amendment.This Agreement and the Merger Agreement may be amended by WABC and KSBthe parties at any time prior to the Effective Time without the approval of the shareholders of WABC and shareholders of KSBRedwood Empire with respect to any of their terms except the terms relating to the form or amount of consideration to be delivered to the KSBRedwood Empire shareholders in the Merger.Merger or any other principal terms of this Agreement or the Merger Agreement as contemplated by Section 1104 of the GCL.

30


     (b) Termination.This Agreement and the Merger Agreement may be terminated as follows:

      (i) By the mutual consent of the Boards of Directors of both WABCWestamerica and KSBRedwood Empire at any time prior to the consummation of the Merger.
 
      (ii) By the Board of Directors of WABCWestamerica on or after September 30, 2002,nine months after the date of this Agreement, if (A) any of the conditions in Section 7 to which the obligations of WABCWestamerica are subject have not been fulfilled, or (B) such conditions have been fulfilled or waived by WABCWestamerica and KSBRedwood Empire shall have failed to complete the Merger.
 
      (iii) By Westamerica or Redwood Empire upon the Boardfailure of Directorsthe shareholders of WABC if (A) WABC has become awareRedwood Empire to give the requisite approval of any facts or circumstances of which it was not aware on the date hereof and which materially adversely affect KSB taken as a whole or its properties, operations or financial condition, (B) a materially adverse change shall have occurred since September 30, 2001, in the business, financial condition taken as a whole, results of operations or properties of KSB taken as a whole, (C) there has been failure or prospective failure on the part of KSB to comply with its obligations under this Agreement or any failure or prospective failure to comply with any ofat the conditions set forth in Section 7 hereof; or (D) KSB fails to act or refrains from doing any act pursuant to Section 3.2(j)(iv).duly convened Redwood Empire shareholders’ meeting.
 
      (iv) By WABCRedwood Empire, upon written notice to Westamerica, if afterthere shall have been a breach by Westamerica or WAB of any of the date hereof, it shall become entitled to terminatecovenants or agreements or any of the representations or warranties set forth in this Agreement on the part of Westamerica or WAB, which breach, either individually or in accordance with Section 3.2(j)(iv) orthe aggregate, would result in the failure of any person (other than WABC or any subsidiary thereof) shall become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the then outstanding shares of KSBconditions set forth in Sections 8(a) or any person (other than WABC8(b) and which breach has not been cured within 60 days following written notice thereof to Westamerica or, a subsidiary thereof) shall have commenced a bona fide tender offer or exchange offer to acquire at least 20% of the then outstanding shares of KSB.by its nature, cannot be cured within such time period.
 
      (v) By the BoardWestamerica, upon written notice to Redwood Empire, if there shall have been a breach by Redwood Empire or NBR of Directors of WABC if it determines that it would be inadvisable or inexpedient to continue to carry out the terms of, or to attempt to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, by reason of any material legal impediment to the Merger having arisen, or any material pending or threatened litigation, investigation or proceeding, including, but not limited to any of the preceding that relate tocovenants or agreements or any of the transactions contemplated byrepresentations or warranties set forth in this Agreement on the part of Redwood Empire or NBR, which affords a material basis,breach, either individually or in the reasonable opinionaggregate, would result in the failure of any of the conditions set forth in Sections 7(a) or 7(b) and which breach has not been cured within 60 days following written notice thereof to Redwood Empire or, by its nature, cannot be cured within such Board,time period.

42


     (vi) By Redwood Empire or Westamerica if any Government Approval required for the Merger has been denied and such determination.denial has become final and nonappealable or any governmental agency of competent jurisdiction shall have issued a final nonappealable order permanently enjoining or prohibiting the Merger.
 
      (vi)(vii) By the Board of Directors of KSBRedwood Empire on or after September 30, 2002,nine months after the date of this Agreement, if (A) any of the conditions contained in Section 8 to which the obligations of KSBRedwood Empire are subject have not been fulfilled, or (B) such conditions have been fulfilled or waived but WABCWestamerica shall have failed to complete the Merger; provided, however, that if WABC is engaged at the time in litigation (including an administrative appeal procedure) relating to an attempt to obtain one or more of the Governmental approvals or if WABC shall be contesting in good faith any litigation which seeks to prevent consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, such non-fulfillment shall not give KSB the right to terminate this Agreement until the earlier of (A) fifteen (15) months after the date of this Agreement and (B) sixty (60) days after the completion of such litigation and of any further regulatory or judicial action pursuant thereto, including any further action by a governmental agency as a result of any judicial remand, order or directive or otherwise or any waiting period with respect thereto.Merger.
 
      (vii)(viii) By Westamerica if Redwood Empire shall have breached in any material respect any of its obligations contained in Section 3.2(j).
     (ix) By Westamerica if the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire shall have failed to recommend adoption of this Agreement at the duly convened Redwood Empire shareholders’ meeting, or withdrawn or modified or qualified (or proposed to withdraw, modify or qualify) in a manner adverse to Westamerica its favorable recommendation of this Agreement or recommended any Competing Transaction to the shareholders of Redwood Empire or taken any action or made any other statement in connection with such meeting or the Merger having such effect.
     (x) By Redwood Empire if the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire shall, concurrently with such termination, authorize Redwood Empire to enter into an agreement with respect to a Competing Transaction; provided, however, that Redwood Empire may only exercise its right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11(b)(x) if (w) Redwood Empire shall have complied in all material respects with Section 3.2(j)(iii); (x) the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire, after consultation with a financial advisor of recognized reputation in similar transactions, has reasonably determined in good faith that such Competing Transaction is a Superior Proposal (taking into account any proposal or offer which shall have been made by Westamerica to modify the terms of this Agreement); (y) the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire has reasonably determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to exercise such right of termination would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law; and (z) simultaneously with such termination, Redwood Empire shall make a payment to Westamerica of the Termination Fee (as defined below); provided, that for purposes of this Section 11(b)(x) the term “Competing Transaction” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(j)(i), except that the reference to “15% or more” in the definition of Competing Transaction shall be deemed to be a reference to “a majority”.
     (xi) By Redwood Empire if Westamerica shall fail to comply with its obligations under Section 3.1(g).
     (xii) By Westamerica if Westamerica enters into an agreement for a Superior Proposal pursuant to clause (ii) of Section 3.1(g), provided that Westamerica shall, simultaneously with such termination, make payment to Redwood Empire of the Termination Fee.
     (xiii) By the Board of Directors of KSBWestamerica if (A) it has become awarethe Westamerica Average Closing Price is greater than $60.66 or by the Board of any facts or circumstancesDirectors of which it was not aware onRedwood Empire if the date hereof and which can or do materially adversely affect WABC or its properties, operations or financial condition, (B) a materially adverse change shall have occurred since September 30, 2001 in the business, financial condition, results of operations or assets of WABC, (C) there has been failure or prospective failure on the part of WABC to comply with its obligations under this Agreement or any failure or prospective failure to comply with any condition set forth in Section 8, or (D) if WABC enters into an agreement to be acquired which does not provide for the assumption of this Agreement as described in Section 3.1(f).Westamerica Average Closing Price is less than $40.44.

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions, no party shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement if the basis for the termination is caused by or exists because of such party’s failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement.

     (c) Notice.The power of termination hereunder may be exercised by WABCWestamerica or KSB,Redwood Empire, as the case may be, only by giving written notice, signed on behalf of such party by its Chairman of the Board or President, to the other party.

31


     (d)  Breach of Obligations.If there has been a material breach by either party in the performance of any of the obligations herein which shall not have been cured within ten business days after written notice thereof has been given to the defaulting party, the nondefaulting party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party. In any event, the nondefaulting party shall have no obligation to consummate any transaction or take any further steps toward such consummation contemplated hereunder until such breach is cured.

(e) Termination and Expenses.Termination In the event of termination of this Agreement shall not terminateby either Redwood Empire or affect the obligations of the parties to pay expensesWestamerica as provided in Section 11,11(b), neither Redwood Empire nor Westamerica shall have any further obligation or liability to the other party except with respect to this Section 11(d) and to maintain

43


the confidentiality of the other party’s information pursuant to Section 3.3, or the provisions of this Section 12(e), Section 12(f) or Sections 13(a), (d) or (e) or the second sentence of Section 13(b) below3.3; provided, however, that nothing herein shall relieve any party from liability for any willful and shall not affect any agreement after such termination. If this Agreement shall be terminated by WABC pursuant to Section 3.2(j)(iv) or Section 12(b)(iv), or if anymaterial breach of the events specified in Section 3.2(j)(iv)warranties and representations made by it, or 12(b)(iv) occurs within twelve (12) months following termination of this Agreement for any of the reasons stated in Section 12(b) (provided that such termination for a reason stated in Section 12(b) results from the actions of a third party or group that thereafter attempts to acquire KSB), KSB shall pay to WABC, on demand, the sum of $1,500,000. If KSB terminates this Agreement under Section 3.1(f), WABC shall pay to KSB, on demand, the sum of $1,000,000. Except as provided in Section 3.2(j)(iv), KSBwillful and WABC agree that any termination of this Agreement shall not in any manner release or be construed as releasing the non-terminating party or parties from any liability or damage to the other party or parties arising out of, in connection with or otherwise relating to, directly or indirectly, such parties’material failure in performance of any of its covenants, agreements or agreementsobligations hereunder.

(f)  Liquidated Damages. In the event of termination of this Agreement, any agreement related to the Bank Merger will also automatically terminate. If WABCWestamerica shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11(b)(viii) or 11(b)(ix) or if Redwood Empire shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11(b)(x), Redwood Empire shall pay to Westamerica (by Fed wire transfer of immediately available funds to such account as may be designated by Westamerica in writing to Redwood Empire) the sum of $4,500,000 (the “Termination Fee”). If Redwood Empire terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 11(b)(xi) or if Westamerica shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11(b)(xii), then Westamerica shall pay to Redwood Empire, on demand (by Fed wire transfer of immediately available funds to such account as may be designated by Redwood Empire in writing to Westamerica), the Termination Fee. If (A) either party shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11(b)(iii) and (B) at any time after the date of this Agreement and at or before the date of the Redwood Empire shareholders’ meeting, a result of:

Competing Transaction (or a proposal therefor) shall have been publicly announced or otherwise publicly communicated to Redwood Empire’s shareholders; and if (C) within twelve (12) months of the date of such termination of this Agreement, Redwood Empire or any of its subsidiaries executes any definitive agreement with respect to, or consummates, any Competing Transaction, then Redwood Empire shall pay to Westamerica the Termination Fee on the Business Day following such execution or consummation; provided, that for purposes of this sentence, the term “Competing Transaction” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(j)(i), except that the reference to “15% or more” in the definition of Competing Transaction shall be deemed to be a reference to “a majority”. In no event shall more than one Termination Fee be payable by either party under this Section 11(d). Westamerica and Redwood Empire (for themselves and their respective affiliates) hereby agree that, upon any termination of this Agreement under circumstances where Westamerica or Redwood Empire is entitled to a Termination Fee under this Section 11(d) and Westamerica or Redwood Empire receives such Termination Fee, Westamerica and Redwood Empire and their respective affiliates shall be precluded from any other remedy against Redwood Empire or Westamerica, at law or in equity or otherwise, and neither Westamerica or Redwood Empire nor any of their respective affiliates shall seek (and Westamerica and Redwood Empire shall cause their respective affiliates not to seek) to obtain any recovery, judgment, or damages of any kind, including consequential, indirect, or punitive damages, against Westamerica or Redwood Empire or their respective subsidiaries or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, partners, managers, members or shareholders in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby.

12.     (i) failure to obtain, or revocation of, KSB’s fairness opinion described in Section 8(l); or
     (ii) failure to obtain approval of KSB’s shareholders; or
     (iii) breach of a representation, warranty or obligation of KSB under this Agreement, where such breach of representation, warranty or obligation is caused in whole or in material part by any action or inaction within the control of KSB or any of its directors or officers,Miscellaneous.

or if KSB terminates the Agreement as a result of failure to obtain, or revocation of, such fairness opinion, then KSB shall pay WABC a fee of $250,000. If WABC becomes entitled to a fee under Section 12(e), the fee payable under this Section shall be credited against the fee payable under Section 12(e).

     If KSB terminates this Agreement as a result of a breach of a representation, warranty or obligation of WABC or Westamerica under this Agreement, where such breach of representation, warranty or obligation is caused in whole or in material part by any action or inaction within the control of WABC or Westamerica or any of its directors or officers, then WABC shall pay KSB a fee of $250,000. If KSB becomes entitled to a fee under Section 12(e), the fee payable under this Section 12(f) shall be credited against the fee payable under Section 12(e).

     The parties have determined that the occurrence of any of the events or circumstances set forth above would cause a substantial damage and loss and lost business opportunities to the other party and that the payments contemplated above provide reasonable and fair compensation for such damage, loss and lost business opportunities and are not intended to be and do not constitute a penalty or forfeiture. Such payments will be made within 10 business days following a termination of the Agreement that gives rise to the payment of such liquidated damages.

32


13.  MISCELLANEOUS.

     (a) Notices.Any notice or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing and delivered personally, or by overnight express or by facsimile or sent by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, addressed as follows:

To WABC:

Westamerica:

David L. Payne, President &

Chief Executive Officer
Westamerica Bancorporation
4550 Mangels Boulevard
Fairfield, CA 94585-1200

With a copy to:

Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP

Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Attention: Thomas G. Reddy
To KSB:Redwood Empire:
C. Robert Wheeler

Patrick W. Kilkenny

President & Chief Executive Officer
Kerman State BankRedwood Empire Bancorp
P.O. Box 356111 Santa Rosa Avenue
Kerman,Santa Rosa, CA 9363095404-4905

With a copy to:

Nixon PeabodyPillsbury Winthrop LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 270050 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 9411194105
Attention:Rodney R. Peck
Attention: R. Brent FayePatricia F. Young

44


or to such other address as either party may designate by notice to the other, and shall be deemed to have been given upon receipt.

     (b) Binding Agreement.This Agreement is binding upon and is for the benefit of WABC, Westamerica, WAB, Redwood Empire and KSBNBR and their respective successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement is not made for the benefit of any person, firm, corporation or association not a party hereto, and no other person, firm, corporation or association shall acquire or have any right under or by virtue of this Agreement.Agreement except with respect to Section 3.1(h). No party may assign this Agreement or any of its rights, privileges, duties or obligations hereunder, whether voluntarily or by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other partyparties to this Agreement.

     (c) Standard. No representation or warranty of Redwood Empire or NBR contained in Article 4 or of Westamerica or WAB contained in Article 5 shall be deemed untrue or incorrect for any purpose under this Agreement, and no party hereto shall be deemed to have breached a representation or warranty for any purpose under this Agreement, in any case as a consequence of the existence or absence of any fact, circumstance or event unless such fact, circumstance or event, individually or when taken together with all other facts, circumstances or events inconsistent with any representations or warranties contained in Article 4, in the case of Redwood Empire or NBR, or Article 5, in the case of Westamerica or WAB, has had or would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect with respect to Redwood Empire or NBR or Westamerica or WAB, respectively (disregarding for purposes of this Section 12(c) any materiality or material adverse effect qualification contained in any representations or warranties).

     The term “material adverse effect” or “material adverse change” means, with respect to any party, a material adverse effect on or change in (i) the business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of such party and its subsidiaries taken as a whole (provided, however, that, with respect to this clause (i), material adverse effect shall not be deemed to include effects to the extent resulting from (a) changes, after the date hereof, in GAAP or RAP requirements applicable to banks and their holding companies generally, (b) changes, after the date hereof, in laws, rules or regulations of general applicability or interpretations thereof by courts or governmental entities, (c) actions or omissions of a party taken with the prior written consent of the other or required hereunder, (d) changes, after the date hereof, in general economic or market conditions affecting banks or their holding companies generally, (e) public disclosure of the transactions contemplated hereby, or (f) any expenses not exceeding those disclosed in the Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule incurred in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby, or (ii) with respect to any party, the ability of such party to timely consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

     The phrases “known” and “knowledge” mean, with respect to any party hereto, the actual knowledge of such party’s executive officers.

(d) No Survival of Representations and Warranties.No investigation by WABCWestamerica or KSBRedwood Empire made before or after the date of this Agreement shall affect the representations and warranties which are contained in this Agreement and such representations and warranties shall survive such investigation, provided that, except with respect to covenants and agreements to be performed in whole or in part subsequent to the Effective Date (as to which the related representations and warranties shall survive until their performance) which covenants and agreements shall survive the Closing, the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of WABCWestamerica and KSBRedwood Empire contained in this Agreement shall not survive the Closing.

     (d)(e) Governing Law.This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.California, without giving effect to its choice of law principles.

     (e)(f) Attorneys’ Fees.In any action at law or suit in equity in relation to this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or suit shall be entitled to receive a reasonable sum for its attorneys’ fees and all other reasonable costs and expenses incurred in such action or suit.

     (f)(g) Entire Agreement; Severability.This Agreement and the documents, certificates, agreements, letters, schedules and exhibits attached or required to be delivered pursuant hereto set forth the entire

45


agreement and understanding of the parties in respect of the transactions contemplated hereby, and supersede all prior agreements, arrangements and understandings relating to the subject matter hereof. Each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in a manner to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision hereof shall be prohibited or ruled invalid under applicable law, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not, except as otherwise required by law, be affected or impaired as a result of such prohibition or ruling. KPMG shall be the sole arbiter of any disagreement about the application of GAAP to this Agreement.

     (g)(h) Counterparts.This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

33


     (h)(i) Specific Performance.The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the failure of either party to fulfill any of its covenants and agreements hereunder, including the failure to take all such actions as are necessary on its part to cause the consummation of the Merger,Mergers, will cause irreparable injury to the other for which damages, even if available, will not be an adequate remedy. Accordingly, each party hereto hereby consent to the issuance of injunctive relief by any court of competent jurisdiction to compel performance of the obligations hereunder and to the granting by any such court of the remedy of the specific performance by the non-performing party of their obligations hereunder.

     (i)(j) Waivers.Prior to or at the Effective Time, each of WABCWestamerica and KSBWAB on one hand and Redwood Empire and NBR on the other shall have the right to waive any default in the performance of any term of this Agreement by the other, to waive or extend the time for the compliance or fulfillment by the other of any and all of the other’s obligations under this Agreement and to waive any or all of the conditions precedent to its obligations under this Agreement, except any condition which, if not satisfied, would result in the violation of any law or applicable governmental regulation. No failure to exercise and no delay in exercising any right, remedy or power hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, remedy or power hereunder preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy or power provided herein or by law or in equity. The waiver by any party of the time for performance of any act or condition hereunder does not constitute a waiver of the act or condition itself. Any requests for waivers or waivers granted pursuant to this Section 13(i)12(j) shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 13(a)12(a) hereof.

3446


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WABC, Westamerica, WAB, Redwood Empire and KSBNBR have each caused this Agreement and Plan of Reorganization to be signed by its Chairman of the Board or President and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and attested by the signature of its Secretary all as of the day and year first above written.

WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION

By: /s/ DAVID L. PAYNE

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
WESTAMERICA BANK

By: /s/ DAVID L. PAYNE

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP

By: /s/ PATRICK W. KILKENNY

President and Chief Executive Officer     
NATIONAL BANK OF THE REDWOODS

By: /s/ PATRICK W. KILKENNY

Chairman of the Board     

47


TABLE OF CONTENTS

           
Page

1. THE MERGER AND BANK MERGER  1 
  1.1 Effective Date  1 
    (a) Merger  1 
    (b) Bank Merger  1 
  1.2 Effect of the Mergers  1 
    (a) Merger  2 
    (b) Bank Merger  2 
2. CONVERSION AND CANCELLATION OF SHARES  2 
  2.1 Conversion of Common Stock of Redwood Empire  2 
    (a) Cancellation of Shares held by Redwood Empire Subsidiaries  2 
    (b) Conversion  2 
    (c) Conversion of Stock Portion  2 
    (d) Cancellation and Exchange of Redwood Empire Shares  3 
    (e) Rights as Shareholders  3 
    (f) Redwood Empire Dissenting Shares  3 
  2.2 Fractional Shares  4 
  2.3 Surrender of Redwood Empire Shares  4 
  2.4 No Further Transfers of Redwood Empire Shares  5 
  2.5 Adjustments  5 
  2.6 Treatment of Stock Options  5 
  2.7 Effect on Westamerica Common Stock  5 
  2.8 Directors of the Surviving Corporation  5 
  2.9 Executive Officers of the Surviving Corporation  6 
  2.10 Directors of the Surviving Bank  6 
3. COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES  6 
  3.1 Covenants of Westamerica  6 
    (a) Reservation, Issuance and Registration of Westamerica Common Stock  6 
    (b) Nasdaq Listing  6 
    (c) Government Approvals  6 
    (d) Notification of Breach of Representations, Warranties and Covenants  7 
    (e) Financial Statements  7 
    (f) Press Releases  7 
    (g) Business Combinations  7 
    (h) Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Insurance Coverage  8 
    (i) Employee Benefits  9 
    (j) Dividends  9 
    (k) Section 16  9 
    (l) Tax-Free Reorganization Treatment  9 
  3.2 Covenants of Redwood Empire  10 
    (a) Approval by Redwood Empire Shareholders  10 
    (b) Shareholder Lists and Other Information  10 
    (c) Government Approvals  10 

i


           
Page

    (d) New Branches and Leases  10 
    (e) Notification of Breach of Representations, Warranties and Covenants  10 
    (f) Financial Statements  11 
    (g) Compensation  12 
    (h) Conduct of Business in the Ordinary Course  12 
    (i) Press Releases  14 
    (j) No Merger or Solicitation  14 
    (k) Employee Benefit Plans  16 
    (l) Changes in Capital Stock  16 
    (m) Dividends  16 
    (n) Accounting Methods  16 
    (o) Affiliates  16 
    (p) Additional Agreements  16 
    (q) Access to Properties, Books and Records; Confidentiality  17 
    (r) Noncompetition/ Nonsolicitation Agreements  17 
    (s) Classifications and Litigation Developments  17 
    (t) Accounting Adjustment before Closing  17 
    (u) Consents  17 
    (v) Cash Reconciliation  18 
    (w) Tax Returns  18 
  3.3 Information and Confidentiality  18 
    (a) Information and Confidentiality  18 
    (b) Asset Review  18 
  3.4 Cooperation  19 
4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF REDWOOD EMPIRE AND NBR  19 
    (a) Corporate Status and Power to Enter Into Agreements  19 
    (b) Articles, Bylaws, Books and Records  20 
    (c) Compliance With Laws, Regulations and Decrees  20 
    (d) Execution and Delivery of the Agreement  20 
    (e) Capitalization  21 
    (f) Equity Interests  21 
    (g) Securities Law Filings  21 
    (h) Financial Statements, Regulatory Reports  21 
    (i) Community Reinvestment Act  22 
    (j) Tax Returns  22 
    (k) Absence of Certain Changes  23 
    (l) No Undisclosed Liabilities  23 
    (m) Indemnification  23 
    (n) Properties and Leases  24 
    (o) Material Contracts  25 
    (p) Classified Loans  25 
    (q) Restrictions on Investments  25 
    (r) Employment Contracts and Benefits  26 
    (s) Compliance With ERISA  27 

ii


           
Page

    (t) Absence of Certain Matters or Arrangements  28 
    (u) Collective Bargaining and Employment Agreements  28 
    (v) Compensation of Officers and Employees  28 
    (w) Legal Actions and Proceedings  28 
    (x) Intellectual Property  29 
    (y) Derivative Transactions  29 
    (z) Facts Affecting Government Approvals  29 
    (aa) Retention of Broker or Consultant  29 
    (bb) Insurance  29 
    (cc) Loan Loss Allowance  30 
    (dd) Transactions With Affiliates  30 
    (ee) Information in Westamerica Registration Statement  30 
    (ff) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties  30 
    (gg) No Brokered Deposits  31 
    (hh) Internal Controls  31 
5. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF WESTAMERICA AND WAB  31 
    (a) Corporate Status and Power to Enter Into Agreement  31 
    (b) Corporate Status and Power of Westamerica and WAB  31 
    (c) Articles, Bylaws, Books and Records  31 
    (d) Compliance With Laws, Regulations and Decrees  32 
    (e) Execution and Delivery of the Agreement  32 
    (f) Securities Law Filings  32 
    (g) Financial Statements, Regulatory Reports  32 
    (h) Community Reinvestment Act  33 
    (i) Material Adverse Change  33 
    (j) Information in Westamerica Registration Statement  33 
    (k) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties  33 
    (l) Employee Benefits  34 
    (m) Compliance With ERISA  34 
    (n) Legal Actions and Proceedings  34 
    (o) Facts Affecting Government Approvals  34 
    (p) Taxes  35 
    (q) Capitalization  35 
    (r) Internal Controls  35 
6. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933  35 
    (a) Preparation and Filing of Registration Statement  35 
    (b) Effectiveness of Registration Statement  35 
    (c) Sales and Resales of Common Stock  36 
    (d) Rule 145  36 
    (e) Blue Sky Compliance  36 
7. CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF WESTAMERICA  36 
    (a) Representations and Warranties  36 
    (b) Compliance and Performance Under Agreement  36 
    (c) Material Adverse Change; Litigation  36 

iii


           
Page

    (d) Approval of Agreement  37 
    (e) Officer’s Certificate  37 
    (f) Opinion of Counsel  37 
    (g) Absence of Legal Impediment  37 
    (h) Effectiveness of Registration Statement  37 
    (i) Government Approvals  37 
    (j) Tax Opinion  37 
    (k) Accountant’s Assurance  38 
    (l) Dissenting Shares  38 
    (m) Unaudited Financials  38 
    (n) Affiliates’ Letter  38 
    (o) Shareholders’ Equity  39 
    (p) Loans and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits  39 
    (q) Consents  39 
    (r) Support Undertakings  39 
    (s) Regulatory Examination  39 
    (t) Noncompetition/ Nonsolicitation Agreements  39 
8. CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF REDWOOD EMPIRE AND NBR  40 
    (a) Representations and Warranties  40 
    (b) Compliance and Performance Under Agreement  40 
    (c) Material Adverse Change; Litigation  40 
    (d) Officer’s Certificate  40 
    (e) Approval of Agreement  40 
    (f) Opinion of Counsel  40 
    (g) Effectiveness of Registration Statement  40 
    (h) Government Approvals  40 
    (i) Tax Opinion  41 
    (j) Absence of Legal Impediment  41 
    (k) Fairness Opinion  41 
9. CLOSING  41 
    (a) Closing Date  41 
    (b) Delivery of Documents  42 
    (c) Filings  42 
10. EXPENSES  42 
11. AMENDMENT; TERMINATION  42 
    (a) Amendment  42 
    (b) Termination  42 
    (c) Notice  43 
    (d) Termination and Expenses  43 
12. MISCELLANEOUS  44 
    (a) Notices  44 
    (b) Binding Agreement  45 
    (c) Standard  45 
    (d) No Survival of Representations and Warranties  45 

iv


Page

(e)Governing Law45
(f)Attorneys’ Fees45
(g)Entire Agreement; Severability45
(h)Counterparts46
(i)Specific Performance46
(j)Waivers46
       
ATTEST:Exhibits

Exhibit A WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION
By:
By:
SecretaryChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
ATTEST:WESTAMERICA BANK
By:
By:
SecretaryChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
ATTEST:KERMAN STATE BANK
By:
By:
SecretaryPresident and Chief Executive Officer
By:
Agreement of Merger    
Exhibit B Vice ChairmanDirector Support and Voting Agreement
Exhibit B-1Voting Agreement
Exhibit CAffiliate’s Agreement
Exhibit DConfidentiality and Nonsolicitation Agreement
Exhibit D-1Noncompetition Agreement
Exhibit EForm of the BoardOpinion of Redwood Empire’s Counsel
Exhibit FForm of Opinion of Westamerica’s Counsel

35v


AGREEMENTINDEX OF MERGERDEFINED TERMS

Section

1933 Act3.1(a)
1934 Act3.2(j)(iv)
Applications4(ee)
Bank MergerRecitals
Bank Merger Agreement1.1(b)
Benefit Plans4(r)(i)
BHCA3.1(c)
Business Combination3.1(g)
Business Day2.1(c)(iv)
Cash Portion2.1(b)
Closing9(a)
Commission3.2(c)
Competing Transaction3.2(j)(i)
Confidentiality Agreement3.2(j)(iii)
Confidentiality and Nonsolicitation Agreement3.2(r)
Crowe Chizek3.2(f)
Derivative Transactions4(y)(ii)
DFI1.1(b)
Director Support and Voting Agreement3.2(a)
dissenting shareholders2.1(f)
Effective Date1.1(a)
Effective Time1.1(a)
Exchange Agent2.3(a)
FDI Act3.2(h)(i)
FDIC3.2(f)(iv)
FRB3.1(c)
FRBSF3.2(h)(i)(H)
GAAP3.1(e)(i)
GCL1.1(a)
Government Approvals3.1(c)
Indemnified Persons3.1(h)
Independent Appraiser3.3(b)(ii)
Independent Loan Reviewer3.3(b)(ii)
Intellectual Property4(x)
IRCRecitals
IRS4(s)
KPMG3.1(e)(i)
knowledge12(c)
known12(c)
Liens4(f)
material adverse change12(c)
material adverse effect12(c)
MergerRecitals

THIS AGREEMENT OF MERGER(this “Agreement”) is made as of                     , 2002, by Kerman State Bank, a California banking corporation (“KSB”), and Westamerica Bank., a California banking corporation (“WAB”).1


Section

Merger Agreement1.1(a)
Merger Consideration2.1(b)
MergersRecitals
Minimum Shareholders’ Equity7(o)
NBRPreamble
Noncompetition Agreement3.2(r)
OCC3.2(f)(iv)
Option Exchange Ratio2.6(b)(ii)
Option Plan2.6
Ordinary Course of Business3.2(h)(i)
OREO3.2(s)
Prospectus6(a)
Proxy Statement3.2(a)
RAP3.3(b)(iii)
Redwood EmpirePreamble
Redwood Empire Disclosure Schedule4
Redwood Empire Insiders3.1(k)
Redwood Empire Shares2.1(a)
Redwood Options2.6
Redwood Plan4(s)
Representatives3.2(j)(i)
Rights2.3(a)
SAS 100 Date3.2(f)(v)
Section 16 Information3.1(k)
Shareholders’ Equity7(o)
Stock Portion2.1(b)
Stock Portion Exchange Ratio2.1(c)
Superior Proposal3.2(j)(iv)
Surviving Bank1.2(b)
Surviving Corporation1.2(a)
tax4(j)
Termination Fee11(d)
Voting Agreement3.2(a)
WABPreamble
WestamericaPreamble
Westamerica Average Closing Price2.1(c)(iv)
Westamerica common stock2.1(b)
Westamerica Plan5(m)
Westamerica Registration Statement6(a)
Westamerica Shares2.1(b)

2


PREAMBLEAnnex B

(HOVDE LOGO)

August 13, 2004

Board of Directors

Redwood Empire Bancorp
111 Santa Rosa Avenue
Santa Rosa, CA 95404-4905

Dear Members of the Board:

     KSB and WAB are entering into this Agreement pursuant to Section 1.1 ofWe understand that certain Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger dated as of February 25, 2002, by and among Westamerica Bancorporation, a California corporation (“Westamerica”), Westamerica Bank, a California banking corporation (“WAB”), Redwood Empire Bancorp, a California corporation (“Redwood Empire”), and KSB. WAB is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Westamerica.

NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:

1.     The Merger.

     KSB shall be merged with and into WAB (the “Merger”). WAB shall be the Surviving Corporation resulting from the Merger.

2.     TermsNational Bank of the Merger.

(a) Articles of Incorporation. The Articles of Incorporation of WAB in effect immediately prior to the Merger shall be the Articles of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until duly amended or repealed. The name of the Surviving Corporation shall be Westamerica Bank.

(b) Bylaws. The Bylaws of WAB in effect immediately prior to the Merger shall be the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation until duly amended or repealed.

(c) Directors and Officers. The directors of the Surviving Corporation shall be the persons who were the directors of WAB immediately prior to the Merger. Such persons shall serve as the directors of the Surviving Corporation from and after the completion of the Merger in accordance with the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation. The executive officers of the Surviving Corporation shall be the persons who were the executive officers of WAB immediately prior to the Merger. Such persons shall serve as the executive officers of the Surviving Corporation from and after the Merger in accordance with the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation.

3.     Manner of Converting Shares.

     By virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of any party, or the shareholders of any party, the shares of the constituent corporations shall be converted as follows:

     (a) Each share of capital stock of WAB issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger, all of which are currently held by Westamerica, shall remain issued and outstanding from and after the completion of the Merger.
     (b) Each share of KSB common stock (excluding shares held by shareholders who perfect their statutory dissenters’ rights) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger shall cease to be outstanding and shall be converted into and exchanged for the right to receive                     shares of Westamerica common stock.
     (c) No fractional shares of Westamerica common stock shall be issued in the Merger. In lieu thereof, each holder of KSB common stock who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share shall receive an amount in cash equal to the product (rounded to the nearest hundredth) obtained by multiplying (a) $                    by (b) the fraction of a share of Westamerica common stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled. No such holder shall be entitled to dividends or other rights in respect of any such fraction.


4.     Further Action.

     KSB shall from time to time, as and when requested by WAB, execute and deliver all such documents and instruments and take all such action necessary or desirable to evidence or carry out this Merger.

5.     Effective Date.

     The effect of the Merger and the effective date of the MergerRedwoods, a national banking association (“NBR”) are as prescribed by law.

2


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.

KERMAN STATE BANK
By
Its
By
Its
WESTAMERICA BANK
By
Its
By
Its

3


Appendix B

February 5, 2002

Members of the Board of Directors
Kerman State Bank
306 South Madera Avenue
Kerman, CA 93630

Members of the Board:

     Kerman State Bank (“KSB”) has proposedabout to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (“Agreement”(the “Agreement”) with Westamerica Bancorporation (“WABC”) and Westamerica Bank (“Westamerica”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of WABC, whereby KSBdated August 13, 2004, pursuant to which Redwood Empire will merge with and into Westamerica. Pursuant toWestamerica (the “Merger”); NBR shall thereafter merge with and into WAB (the “Bank Merger” and together with the Merger, the “Mergers”). As set forth in Section 2.1(b) of the Agreement, shareholderson the Effective Date of KSB shall be entitled to receive consideration, in the form of WABC common stock, equal to 1.6 times KSB’s adjusted equity of $9,861,000 as defined in the Agreement and subject to certain adjustments based on KSB’s level of performing loans, the adequacy of KSB’s allowance for loan losses and additional “significant liabilities”Merger (as defined in the Agreement). each outstanding share of Redwood Empire common stock (“Redwood Empire Share”) will be converted into the right to receive per share merger consideration (the “Merger Consideration”) in the amount of $28.74 per share, consisting of $11.49 in cash (the “Cash Portion”) and $17.25 in shares of the common stock, without par value, of Westamerica (“Westamerica Common Stock” or “Westamerica Shares”) (the “Stock Portion”), subject to adjustments described in Section 2.1(c) of the Agreement. In no event shall the aggregate consideration payable to KSB shareholders be less than $12,500,000.00.

     Youconnection therewith, you have asked forrequested our opinion as your financial advisor, as to whether the consideration to be received by the shareholders of KSB pursuant to the Agreement is fair to such shareholdersfairness, from a financial point of view, as of the date hereof.Merger Consideration (as defined in the Agreement) to the shareholders of Redwood Empire.

     InHovde Financial LLC (“Hovde”), as part of its investment banking business, is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive bidding, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes. We are familiar with Redwood Empire, having acted as its financial advisor in connection with, and having participated in the negotiations leading to, the Agreement.

     We were retained by Redwood Empire to act as its financial advisor in connection with the Merger. We will receive compensation from Redwood Empire in connection with our opinion we have, among other things: (i) reviewed certain publicly available financial and other data with respect to KSB, WABC and Westamerica, including the consolidated financial statements for recent years and interim periods to September 30, 2001 and certain other relevant financial and operating data relating to KSB, WABC and Westamerica made available to us from published sources and internal records including financial and operating data for KSB as of December 31, 2001; (ii) reviewed the Agreement; (iii) reviewed certain publicly available information concerning the trading of, and the trading market for, KSB Common Stock, WABC Common Stock and other banking institutions; (iv) compared KSB and WABC from a financial point of view with certain other companies in the banking industry which we deemed to be relevant; (v) considered the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of recent business combinations of companies in the banking industry which we deemed to be comparable, in whole or in part, to the Agreement; (vi) reviewed and discussed with representatives of the management of KSB certain information of a business and financial nature regarding KSB, furnished to us by them, including financial forecasts and related assumptions of KSB; (vii) made inquiries regarding and discussed the Agreement and other matters related thereto with KSB’s counsel; and (viii) performed such other analysis and examinations as we have deemed appropriate. We have conducted meetings with the Chief Executive Officer of KSB for the purpose of reviewing the future prospects of KSB. We have taken into account our assessment of economic, regulatory, market and industry conditions as they relate generally and specifically to the geographic market in which KSB operates. We have applied our overall knowledge of the banking industry and our experience in securities valuations.

     In connection with our review and in arriving at our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information provided to us or publicly available, and we have not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of the same. We have assumed that there have been no material changes in the assets, financial condition, results of operation, business or prospects since the respective dates of their last financial statements made available to us relating to KSB, WABC and Westamerica. We have relied upon the management of KSB as to the reasonableness of financial and operating forecasts and projections and we have assumed that such forecasts and projections reflect the best currently available estimates and judgements of the management of KSB. We have also assumed, without assuming any responsibility for independent verification of same, that the allowance for loan losses for KSB is

B-1


Kerman State Bank
February 5, 2002
Page 2

adequate to cover such losses. We have not made or obtained any evaluations or appraisals of the property of KSB, nor have we examined any individual loan credit files. For purposes of this opinion, we have assumed that the transaction will have the tax, accounting and legal effects described in the Agreement and assumed the accuracy of the disclosures set forth in the Agreement. Our opinion is necessarily based upon economic, monetary and market conditions existing as of the date hereof. Our opinion as expressed herein is limited to the fairness, from a financial standpoint, to all holder of KSB stock as to the terms of the Agreement.

     This opinion is furnished pursuant to our engagement letter dated March 5, 2001, and is solely for the benefit of the Board of Directors and stockholders of KSB. We have acted as financial advisor to KSB in connection with a variety of activities including those leading to the Agreement and will receive a fee for our services, including the rendering of this opinion, a significant portion of which is contingent upon the consummation of the Agreement.Merger. Redwood Empire has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out of our engagement.

(Hovde Letterhead)


Board of Directors
Redwood Empire Bancorp
August 13, 2004
Page 2

     During the course of our engagement and for the purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:

     (i) reviewed the Agreement;
     (ii) reviewed certain historical publicly available business and financial information concerning Redwood Empire and Westamerica;
     (iii) reviewed certain internal financial statements and other financial and operating data concerning Redwood Empire and Westamerica;
     (iv) analyzed certain financial projections prepared by the managements of Redwood Empire and Westamerica;
     (v) conducted meetings with members of the senior management of Redwood Empire for the purpose of reviewing the future prospects of Redwood Empire, including financial forecasts related to the respective businesses, earnings, assets, liabilities and the amount and timing of cost savings and revenue enhancements (the “Synergies”) expected to be achieved as a result of the Merger;
     (vi) reviewed historical market prices and trading volumes for Redwood Empire Common Stock and Westamerica Common Stock;
     (vii) reviewed the terms of recent merger and acquisition transactions, to the extent publicly available, involving banks and bank holding companies that we considered relevant;
     (viii) evaluated the pro forma ownership of Westamerica Common Stock by Redwood Empire shareholders relative to the pro forma contribution of Redwood Empire’s assets, liabilities, equity and earnings to the combined company;
     (ix) analyzed the pro forma impact of the Merger on the combined company’s earnings per share, consolidated capitalization and financial ratios; and
     (x) performed such other analyses and considered such other factors as we have deemed appropriate.

     We also took into account our assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions and our experience in other transactions as well as our knowledge of the banking industry and our general experience in securities valuations.

     In furnishingrendering this opinion, we dohave assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information and representations contained in the materials provided to us by Redwood Empire and Westamerica and in the discussions with the management of Redwood Empire and Westamerica. In that regard, we have assumed that the financial forecasts, including, without limitation, the Synergies and projections for Redwood Empire and NBR and Westamerica and WAB regarding monthly earnings projections, projected loan and deposit balances, under-performing and nonperforming assets and net charge-offs have been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available information and judgments and estimates of Redwood Empire and Westamerica and that such forecasts will be realized in the amounts and at the times contemplated thereby. We are not admitexperts in the evaluation of loan and lease portfolios for purposes of assessing the adequacy of the allowances for losses with respect thereto and have assumed that such allowances for Redwood Empire and Westamerica are in the aggregate adequate to cover such losses. We were not retained to and did not conduct a physical inspection of any of the properties or facilities of Redwood Empire or Westamerica. In addition, we have not reviewed individual credit files nor have we made an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets and liabilities of Redwood Empire and Westamerica and we were not furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals.

2


Board of Directors
Redwood Empire Bancorp
August 13, 2004
Page 3

     We have assumed that the Merger will be consummated substantially in accordance with the terms set forth in the Agreement. We have further assumed that the Merger will be accounted for as a purchase under generally accepted accounting principles and that it will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes. We have assumed that the Merger is, and will be, in compliance with all laws and regulations that are an expertapplicable to Redwood Empire and Westamerica. In rendering this opinion, we have been advised by Redwood Empire and Westamerica and we have assumed that there are no factors that would impede any necessary regulatory or governmental approval of the Merger and we have further assumed that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory and governmental approvals, no restriction will be imposed on Redwood Empire or Westamerica that would have a material adverse effect on Westamerica, as the surviving corporation, or the contemplated benefits of the Merger. We have also assumed that there would not occur any change in applicable law or regulation that would cause a material adverse change in the prospects or operations of Westamerica as the surviving corporation after the Merger.

     Our opinion is based solely upon the information available to us and the economic, market and other circumstances as they exist as of the date hereof. Events occurring and information that becomes available after the date hereof could materially affect the assumptions and analyses used in preparing this opinion. We have not undertaken to reaffirm or revise this opinion or otherwise comment upon any events occurring or information that becomes available after the date hereof, except as otherwise agreed in our engagement letter.

     We are not expressing any opinion herein as to the prices at which shares of Westamerica Common Stock issued in the Merger may trade if and when they are issued or at any future time, nor does our opinion constitute a recommendation to any holder of a Redwood Empire Share as to how such holder should vote with respect to the Agreement at any meeting of holders of Redwood Empire Shares. As you are aware, in the course of its daily trading activities, investment funds controlled by an affiliate (as such term is defined in Regulation 12G-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of Hovde and their affiliates may from time to time effect transactions and hold securities of Redwood Empire and Westamerica and may be long or short in such securities.

     This letter is solely for the information of the Board of Directors of Redwood Empire and is not to be used, circulated, quoted or otherwise referred to for any other purpose, nor is it to be filed with, included in or referred to in whole or in part in any registration statement, proxy statement or any other securities filing withindocument, except in each case in accordance with our prior written consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, that we hereby consent to the meaninginclusion and reference to this letter in any registration statement, proxy statement, information statement or tender offer document to be delivered to the holders of Redwood Empire Shares in connection with the Merger if and only if this letter is quoted in full or attached as an exhibit to such document and this letter has not been withdrawn prior to the date of such document.

     Subject to the foregoing and based on our experience as investment bankers, our activities and assumptions as described above, and other factors we have deemed relevant, we are of the terms “experts”opinion as used inof the Securities Act anddate hereof that the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Nor do we admit that his opinion constitutes a report or valuation within the meaning of Section 11 or the Securities Act. Our opinion is directedMerger Consideration pursuant to the Board of KSB, covers only the fairness of the Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to the KSB stockholders as of the date hereof and does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of KSB Common Stock as to how such shareholder should vote concerning the Agreement. Except as provided in the engagement letter, this opinion may not be used or referred to by KSB or quoted or disclosed to any person in any manner without our prior written consent, which consent is hereby given to the inclusion of this opinion in any proxy statement or prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Agreement.

     Based upon and subject to the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, it is our opinion that, as of today’s date, the Agreement is fair to the shareholders of KSB from a financial standpoint.Redwood Empire.

Very truly yours,
Sincerely,
/s/ HOVDE FINANCIAL LLC
HOVDE FINANCIAL LLC

JAMES H. AVERY COMPANY3


APPENDIXANNEX C

SECTIONS 1300-1304 OF CHAPTER 13 OF
THE CALIFORNIA GENERAL CORPORATION CODE

§Section 1300. Right to Require Purchase — “Dissenting Shares” and “Dissenting Shareholder” Defined.

(a) If the approval of the outstanding shares (Section 152) of a corporation is required for a reorganization under subdivisions (a) and (b) or subdivision (e) or (f) of Section 1201, each shareholder of the corporation entitled to vote on the transaction and each shareholder of a subsidiary corporation in a short-form merger may, by complying with this chapter, require the corporation in which the shareholder holds shares to purchase for cash at their fair market value the shares owned by the shareholder which are dissenting shares as defined in subdivision (b). The fair market value shall be determined as of the day before the first announcement of the terms of the proposed reorganization or short-form merger, excluding any appreciation or depreciation in consequence of the proposed action, but adjusted for any stock split, reverse stock split, or share dividend which becomes effective thereafter.

     (b) As used in this chapter, “dissenting shares” means shares which come within all of the following descriptions:

      (1) Which were not immediately prior to the reorganization or short-form merger either (A) listed on any national securities exchange certified by the Commissioner of Corporations under subdivision (o) of Section 25100 or (B) listed on the list of National Market System of the NASDAQ Stock Market, and the notice of meeting of shareholders to act upon the reorganization summarizes this section and Sections 1301, 1302, 1303 and 1304; provided, however, that this provisionsprovision does not apply to any shares with respect to which there exists any restriction on transfer imposed by the corporation or by any law or regulation; and provided, further, that this provision does not apply to any class of shares described in subparagraph (A) or (B) if demands for payment are filed with respect to 5 percent or more of the outstanding shares of that class.
 
      (2) Which were outstanding on the date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote on the reorganization and (A) were not voted in favor of the reorganization or, (B) if described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) (without regard to the provisos in that paragraph), were voted against the reorganization, or which were held of record on the effective date of a short-form merger; provided, however, that subparagraph (A) rather than subparagraph (B) of this paragraph applies in any case where the approval required by Section 1201 is sought by written consent rather than at a meeting.
 
      (3) Which the dissenting shareholder has demanded that the corporation purchase at their fair market value, in accordance with Section 1301.
 
      (4) Which the dissenting shareholder has submitted for endorsement, in accordance with Section 1302.

     (c) As used in this chapter, “dissenting shareholder” means the recordholder of dissenting shares and includes a transferee of record.

§Section 1301. Demand for Purchase.

(a) If, in the case of a reorganization, any shareholders of a corporation have a right under Section 1300, subject to compliance with paragraphs (3) and (4) of subdivision (b) thereof, to require the corporation to purchase their shares for cash, such corporation shall mail to each such shareholder a notice of the approval of the reorganization by its outstanding shares (Section 152) within 10 days after the date of such approval, accompanied by a copy of Sections 1300, 1302, 1303, 1304 and this section, a statement of the price determined by the corporation to represent the fair market value of the dissenting shares, and a brief description of the procedure to be followed if the shareholder desires to exercise the shareholder’s right under such sections. The statement of price constitutes an offer by the corporation to purchase at the price stated any

C-1


dissenting shares as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1300, unless they lose their status as dissenting shares under Section 1309.

     (b) Any shareholder who has a right to require the corporation to purchase the shareholder’s shares for cash under Section 1300, subject to compliance with paragraphs (3) and (4) of subdivision (b) thereof, and who desires the corporation to purchase such shares shall make written demand upon the corporation for the

1


purchase of such shares and payment to the shareholder in cash of their fair market value. The demand is not effective for any purpose unless it is received by the corporation or any transfer agent thereof (1) in the case of shares described in clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 1300 (without regard to the provisos in that paragraph), not later than the date of the shareholders’ meeting to vote upon the reorganization, or (2) in any other case within 30 days after the date on which the notice of the approval by the outstanding shares pursuant to subdivision (a) or the notice pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the shareholder.

     (c) The demand shall state the number and class of the shares held of record by the shareholder which the shareholder demands that the corporation purchase and shall contain a statement of what such shareholder claims to be the fair market value of those shares as of the day before the announcement of the proposed reorganization or short-form merger. The statement of fair market value constitutes an offer by the shareholder to sell the shares at such price.

§Section 1302. Endorsement of Shares.

Within 30 days after the date on which notice of the approval by the outstanding shares or the notice pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the shareholder, the shareholder shall submit to the corporation at its principal office or at the office of any transfer agent thereof, (a) if the shares are certificated securities, the shareholder’s certificates representing any shares which the shareholder demands that the corporation purchase, to be stamped or endorsed with a statement that the shares are dissenting shares or to be exchanged for certificates of appropriate denomination so stamped or endorsed or (b) if the shares are uncertificated securities, written notice of the number of shares which the shareholder demands that the corporation purchase. Upon subsequent transfers of the dissenting shares on the books of the corporation, the new certificates, initial transaction statement, and other written statements issued therefor shall bear a like statement, together with the name of the original dissenting holder of the shares.

§Section 1303. Agreed Price — Time for Payment.

(a) If the corporation and the shareholder agree that the shares are dissenting shares and agree upon the price of the shares, the dissenting shareholder is entitled to the agreed price with interest thereon at the legal rate on judgments from the date of the agreement. Any agreements fixing the fair market value of any dissenting shares as between the corporation and the holders thereof shall be filed with the secretary of the corporation.

     (b) Subject to the provisions of Section 1306, payment of the fair market value of dissenting shares shall be made within 30 days after the amount thereof has been agreed or within 30 days after any statutory or contractual conditions to the reorganization are satisfied, whichever is later, and in the case of certificated securities, subject to surrender of the certificates therefor, unless provided otherwise by agreement.

§Section 1304. Dissenter’s Action to Enforce Payment.

(a) If the corporation denies that the shares are dissenting shares, or the corporation and the shareholder fail to agree upon the fair market value of the shares, then the shareholder demanding purchase of such shares as dissenting shares or any interested corporation, within six months after the date on which notice of the approval by the outstanding shares (Section 152) or notice pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the shareholder, but not thereafter, may file a complaint in the superior court of the proper county praying the court to determine whether the shares are dissenting shares or the fair market value of the dissenting shares or both or may intervene in any action pending on such a complaint.

C-2


     (b) Two or more dissenting shareholders may join as plaintiffs or be joined as defendants in any such action and two or more such actions may be consolidated.

     (c) On the trial of the action, the court shall determine the issues. If the status of the shares as dissenting shares is in issue, the court shall first determine that issue. If the fair market value of the dissenting shares is in issue, the court shall determine, or shall appoint one or more impartial appraisers to determine, the fair market value of the shares.

C-32


PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 20.     Indemnification of Officers and Directors.Indemnification of Officers and Directors.

     Section 317 of the California General Corporation Law permits indemnification of directors, officers and employees of corporations under certain conditions and subject to certain limitations. Article VI of the Articles of Incorporation of the registrant contains provisions limiting the monetary liability of directors for breaches of the duty of care. Article VII of the Articles of Incorporation of the registrant contains provisions for the indemnification of directors, officers and employees to the fullest extent permitted, and in excess of that authorized, under Section 317. In addition, the registrant maintains officers and directors liability insurance for an annual aggregate maximum of $20,000,000.

Item 21.     Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

     (a) Exhibits.

     
ExhibitsDescription of Exhibit


 2  Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated FebruaryAugust 25, 20022004 (included in Part I as AppendixAnnex A).
 3(a)4Articles of incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) of the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998) Amended and Restated Shareholder Rights Agreement dated as of November 19, 1999 between the registrant and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, (incorporated by reference to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K/A, Amendment No. 3, filed November 19,1999).
3(b)Bylaws (incorporated by reference from the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).
4(a)(a) Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated November 19, 1999, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Registrant’s Form 8-A/A, Amendment No. 3, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 19, 1999.1999
 5  Opinion of Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP.LLP
 8(a) OpinionForm of opinion of Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP regarding tax matters.matters (to be provided by amendment)
 10(a)8(b) 1995 Stock Option Plan, incorporated hereinForm of opinion of Pillsbury Winthrop LLP regarding tax matters (to be provided by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 1995.*amendment)
 10(b)23Employment Agreement with E. Joseph Bowler dated January 7, 1987, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1999.*
10(c)Employment Agreement with Robert W. Entwisle dated January 7, 1987, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1999.*
10(d)Senior Note Agreement of Westamerica Bancorporation dated February 1, 1996, of $22,500,000 at 7.11 percent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10-j of registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 1996).
10(e)Westamerica Bancorporation Chief Executive Officer Deferred Compensation Agreement by and between Westamerica Bancorporation and David L. Payne, dated December 18, 1998 (incorporated by reference from the exhibits to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).*
11Statement re computation of earnings per share, included in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements included in the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.

II-1


ExhibitsDescription of Exhibit


13(a)The registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, incorporated herein by reference.
13(b)Westamerica’s 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
21Subsidiaries of the registrant (incorporated by reference from the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
23(a)(a) Consent of KPMG LLP.LLP
 23(b)23(b) Consent of Moss Adams, LLP.Crowe Chizek & Company, LLP
 23(c)23(c) Consent of Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP (included in their opinion filed as Exhibit 5).
 23(d)23(d) Consent of James H. Avery CompanyHovde Financial LLC (included in its opinion attached to Part I as AppendixAnnex B).
 23(e)23(e) Consent of Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP re tax opinion (to be included in their opinion to be filed as Exhibit 8).8(a))
 2423(f) PowerConsent of Attorney of directors of Westamerica (includedPillsbury Winthrop LLP re tax opinion (to be included in this Part II).their opinion to be filed as Exhibit 8(b))
 99(a) Proxy card of Kerman State Bank.Redwood Empire Bancorp
99(b)Fairness Opinion of Hovde Financial LLC (attached to Part I as Annex B)


Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

     (b) Financial Statement Schedules.

     [Included in Westamerica’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,2003, filed with the Commission on March 10, 2004, incorporated herein by reference].reference.

Item 22.     Undertakings.Undertakings.

     (1) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to deliver or cause to be delivered with the Prospectus, to each person to whom the Prospectus is sent or given, the latest annual report to security holders that is incorporated by reference in the Prospectus and furnished pursuant to and meeting the requirements of Rule 14a-3 or Rule 14c-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”); and, where interim financial information required to be presented by Article 3 of Regulation S-X of the 1934 Act are not set forth in the Prospectus, to deliver, or cause to be delivered to each person to whom the Prospectus is sent or given, the latest quarterly report that is specifically incorporated by reference in the Prospectus to provide such interim financial information.

     (2) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other Items of the applicable form.

     (3) The registrant undertakes that every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (2) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the 1933 Act and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415 of the 1933 Act, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any liability under the 1933 Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

     (4) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the 1933 Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions described in Item 20 above, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In

II-2


the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

     (5) Westamerica hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the 1933 Act, each filing of Westamerica’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) 1934 Act (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the 1934 Act) that is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

     (6) Westamerica hereby undertakes to respond to requests for information that is incorporated by reference into the Prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11, or 13 of this Form S-4 within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the Registration Statement through the date of responding to the request.

     (7) Westamerica hereby undertakes to supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning its merger transaction with Kerman State Bank that was not the subject of and included in this Registration Statement when it became effective.

     (8) Westamerica hereby undertakes:

      (a) To file during any period in which offers of sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:

      (i) to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the 1933 Act;

II-1


      (ii) to reflect in the Prospectusprospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the Registration Statement;Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the Calculation of Registration Fee table in the effective registration statement; and;
 
      (iii) to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or any material change to such information in the Registration Statement.

      (b) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the 1933 Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
 
      (c) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(2) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each filing of the registrant’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (and, where applicable, each filing of any employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of all such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initialbona fideoffering thereof.

     (3) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other Items of the applicable form.

     (4) The registrant undertakes that every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to the paragraph (3) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the 1933 Act and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415 of the 1933 Act, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any liability under the 1933 Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

     (5) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the 1933 Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions described in Item 20 above, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

II-2


     (6) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond to requests for information that is incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11, or 13 of this Form S-4 within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration statement through the date of responding to the request.

     (7) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in this registration statement when it became effective.

II-3


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-4 and has caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of San Rafael, California, on March 28, 2002.October 14, 2004.

 WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION

 BYBy /s/ DAVID L. PAYNE
 
 David L. Payne
 Chief Executive Officer

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

     
SignatureTitleDate



 
/s/ DAVID L. PAYNE

David L. Payne
 President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
 March 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ JENNIFER J. FINGERDENNIS R. HANSEN

Jennifer J. FingerDennis R. Hansen
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerController (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) March 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ ETTA ALLEN

Etta Allen
 Director March 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ LOUIS E. BARTOLINI

Louis E. Bartolini
 Director March 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ DON EMERSONE. JOSEPH BOWLER

Don EmersonE. Joseph Bowler
 Director March 28, 2002
/s/ LOUIS H. HERWALDT

Louis H. Herwaldt
DirectorMarch 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ ARTHUR C. LATNO, JR.

Arthur C. Latno, Jr.
 Director March 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ PATRICK D. LYNCH

Patrick D. Lynch
 Director March 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ CATHERINE COPE MACMILLAN

Catherine Cope MacMillan
 Director March 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ PATRICK J. MON PERERONALD A. NELSON

Patrick J. Mon PereRonald A. Nelson
 Director March 28, 2002October 14, 2004

II-4


     
SignatureTitleDate



 
/s/ RONALD A. NELSON

Ronald A. Nelson
DirectorMarch 28, 2002
/s/ CARL R. OTTO

Carl R. Otto
 Director March 28, 2002
/s/ MICHAEL J. RYAN, JR.

Michael J. Ryan, Jr.
DirectorMarch 28, 2002October 14, 2004
 
/s/ EDWARD B. SYLVESTER

Edward B. Sylvester
 Director March 28, 2002October 14, 2004

II-5


POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Know all men by these presents that each of the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint David L. Payne and Jennifer J. Finger, or either of them, as the true and lawful attorney-in-fact of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to execute and deliver the Registration Statement on Form S-4, and any and all amendments thereto, including without limitation pre-effective and post-effective amendments thereto; such Form S-4 and each such amendment to be in such form and to contain such terms and provisions as said attorney or substitute shall deem necessary or desirable; giving and granting unto said attorney, or to such person as in any case may be appointed pursuant to the power of substitution herein given, full power and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary or, in the opinion of said attorney or substitute, able to be done in such matter as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or such substitute shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In witness whereof, each of the undersigned has duly executed this Power of Attorney.

SignatureDate


/s/ ETTA ALLEN

Etta Allen
March 28, 2002
/s/ LOUIS E. BARTOLINI

Louis E. Bartolini
March 28, 2002
/s/ DON EMERSON

Don Emerson
March 28, 2002
/s/ LOUIS H. HERWALDT

Louis H. Herwaldt
March 28, 2002
/s/ ARTHUR C. LATNO, JR.

Arthur C. Latno, Jr.
March 28, 2002
/s/ PATRICK D. LYNCH

Patrick D. Lynch
March 28, 2002
/s/ CATHERINE COPE MACMILLAN

Catherine Cope MacMillan
March 28, 2002
/s/ PATRICK J. MON PERE

Patrick J. Mon Pere
March 28, 2002
/s/ RONALD A. NELSON

Ronald A. Nelson
March 28, 2002
/s/ CARL R. OTTO

Carl R. Otto
March 28, 2002
/s/ MICHAEL J. RYAN, JR.

Michael J. Ryan, Jr.
March 28, 2002
/s/ EDWARD B. SYLVESTER

Edward B. Sylvester
March 28, 2002

II-6


EXHIBIT INDEX

         
ExhibitsDescription of ExhibitPage



  52  OpinionAgreement and Plan of McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP. Reorganization dated August 25, 2004 (included in Part I as Annex A)    
  85  Opinion of Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP regarding tax matters    
 23(a)8(a) Form of opinion of Bingham McCutchen LLP regarding tax matters*
8(b)Form of opinion of Pillsbury Winthrop LLP regarding tax matters*
23(a) Consent of KPMG LLP. LLP    
 23(b)23(b) Consent of Moss Adams, LLP. Crowe Chizek & Company, LLP    
 23(c)23(c) Consent of Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP (included in their opinion filed as Exhibit 5)    
 23(d)23(d) Consent of James H. Avery CompanyHovde Financial, Inc. (included in its opinion attached to Part I as AppendixAnnex B)    
 23(e)23(e) Consent of Bingham McCutchen Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP re tax opinion (included in their opinion filed as Exhibit 8)8(a))  * 
 2423(f)Consent of Pillsbury Winthrop LLP re tax opinion (included in their opinion filed as Exhibit 8(b))  Power*
99(a)Proxy card of Attorney of directors of Westamerica (included in Part II)Redwood Empire Bancorp    
 99(b) Proxy cardFairness Opinion of Kerman State BankHovde Financial LLC (attached to Part I as Annex B)    


to be provided by amendment