QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ,June 8, 2004

Registration No. 333-            



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


iSTAR FINANCIAL INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

MARYLAND
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 6798
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
 95-6881527
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

1114 Avenue of the Americas, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10036
(212) 930-9400
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)


Jay Sugarman
Chief Executive Officer
1114 Avenue of the Americas, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10036
(212) 930-9400
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)


Copies to:
Kathleen L. Werner, Esq.
Clifford Chance US LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10166
(212) 878-8000

        Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective and all other conditions to the exchange offer pursuant to the registration rights agreement described in the enclosed prospectus have been satisfied or waived.

        If the securities being registered on this form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.    o

        If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

        If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o



CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title Of Each Class Of
Securities To Be Registered

 Amount To
Be Registered

 Proposed Maximum
Offering Price Per
Note(1)

 Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price(1)

 Amount Of Registration
Fee(2)

 Amount To
Be Registered

 Proposed Maximum
Offering Price Per
Note(1)

 Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price(1)

 Amount Of Registration
Fee(2)


4.875% Series B Senior Notes due 2009 $350,000,000 100%$350,000,000 $44,345
5.125% Series B Senior Notes due 2011 $250,000,000 100%$250,000,000 $31,675

(1)
Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee under the Securities Act of 1933.

(2)
Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(f)(2).

        The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the SEC, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.




The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not offer these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to completion, dated April 6,June 8, 2004

PROSPECTUS

OFFER TO EXCHANGE

4.875%5.125% Series B Senior Notes due 20092011 which have been registered under the Securities
Act for any and all outstanding 4.875%5.125% Series A Senior Notes Due 2009due 2011

($350,000,000250,000,000 principal amount outstanding at maturity)

iSTAR FINANCIAL INC.

The exchange offer and withdrawal rights will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on                        , 2004 (unless we extend the exchange offer).

        We are offering to exchange our 4.875%5.125% Series B Senior Notes due 2009,2011, referred to herein as the Series B Notes, for the identical principal amount of our 4.875%5.125% Series A Senior Notes due 2009,2011, referred to herein as the Series A Notes. The aggregate principal amount at maturity of the Series A Notes, and therefore the principal amount at maturity of Series B Notes which would be issued if all the Series A Notes were exchanged, is $350,000,000.$250,000,000. The terms of the Series B Notes will be identical with the terms of the Series A Notes, except that the issuance of the Series B Notes is being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and therefore the Series B Notes will not be subject to restrictions on transfer which apply to the Series A Notes.

        The Series A Notes were issued in transactions which were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act solely to qualified institutional buyers, as that term is defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act, or outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. The exchange offer is being made in accordance with a registration rights agreement, dated January 23,March 30, 2004, among us, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Citicorp Global Markets Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities, LLC, Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC. Based on interpretations by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we believe a holder (other than a broker-dealer who acquired Series A Notes directly from us for resale or an affiliate of ours) may offer and sell Series B Notes issued in exchange for Series A Notes without registration under the Securities Act and without the need to deliver a prospectus, if the holder acquired the Series B Notes in the ordinary course of its business and the holder has no arrangement to participate, and is not otherwise engaged, in a distribution of the Series B Notes.

        Prior to the exchange offer, there has been no public market for the Series B Notes. We do not currently intend to list the Series B Notes on a securities exchange or seek approval for quotation of the Series B Notes on an automated quotation system. Therefore, it is unlikely that an active trading market for the Series B Notes will develop.

        The exchange agent for the exchange offer is U.S. Bank Trust National Association.

        See "Risk Factors," which begin on page 15,13, for a discussion of certain factors that should be considered in evaluating the exchange offer.

        THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

The date of this prospectus is                April     , 2004.



Creative Capital Solutions and the iStar Financial logo are
registered trade marks of iStar Financial Inc.


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        We make statements in this prospectus and the documents we incorporate by reference that are considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are usually identified by the use of words such as "will," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "projects," "plans," "intends," "should" or similar expressions. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about our plans, strategies and prospects, which are based on the information currently available to us and on assumptions we have made. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations as reflected in or suggested by those forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. We have discussed in this prospectus some important risks, uncertainties and contingencies which could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the forward-looking statements we make in these documents.

        We assume no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In evaluating forward-looking statements, you should consider these risks and uncertainties, together with the other risks described from time to time in our reports and documents filed with the SEC, and you should not place undue reliance on those statements.

i



PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

        This summary may not contain all the information that may be important to you. You should read the entire prospectus, as well as the documents incorporated by reference in it, before making an investment decision. All references to "we" or "us" in this prospectus refer to iStar Financial Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise. For the definitions of "adjusted earnings" and "EBITDA" and for a detailed reconciliation of each of adjusted earnings and EBITDA to net income determined in accordance with GAAP, see "Prospectus Summary—Adjusted Earnings and EBITDA."


iStar Financial Inc.

Overview

        We are the leading publicly-traded finance company focused exclusively on the commercial real estate industry. We provide custom-tailored financing to high-end private and corporate owners of real estate nationwide, including senior and junior mortgage debt, senior mezzanine and subordinatedmezzanine corporate capital, and corporate net lease financing. Our objective is to generate consistent and attractive returns on our invested capital by providing innovative and value-added financing solutions to our customers. We deliver customized financial products and "one-call" responsiveness post-closing to sophisticated real estate borrowers and corporate customers who require a high level of creativity and service. Our ability to provide value-added financial solutions has consistently enabled us to realize margins and returns on capital that are more attractive than those earned by many other commercial finance companies. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our total enterprise value (market value of equity plus book value of preferred stock and debt, less cash balances) was $8.7$9.7 billion, and our EBITDA and net income for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 were $535.6$33.7 million and $292.2($53.8) million, respectively.

        We began our business in 1993 through private investment funds formed to take advantage of the lack of well-capitalized lenders capable of servicing the needs of high-end customers in our markets. During our eleven-year history, we have structured or originated $9.4$10 billion of financing commitments.

        By capitalizing on our competitive strengths, we have delivered consistent financial performance, developed a high-quality, diversified asset base and established ourselves as a reliable provider of financial solutions for our customers. We have maintained strong credit statistics and have consistently grown our EBITDA since the quarter ended June 1998, our first quarter as a public company. Between that quarter and the quarter ended December 31, 2003, we grew our EBITDA and net income from approximately $30.7 million and $19.9 million, respectively, to $140.5 million and $79.6 million, respectively.

1



        The graph below shows our EBITDA and net income since 1999.


EBITDA(1) and Net Income

        GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
EBITDA is calculated as net income plus the sum of interest expense, depreciation and amortization, minority interest in consolidated entities, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and costs incurred in acquiring the former advisor minus income from discontinued operations and gain from discontinued operations.

(2)
EBITDA and net income include a $15.0 million non-cash charge related to performance-based vesting of restricted shares granted under our long-term incentive plan.

Competitive Strengths

        We believe the following competitive strengths distinguish our business model from other commercial finance enterprises and contribute to our ability to generate consistent returns on our invested capital.

        Creative Capital Solutions    We target markets where customers require a knowledgeable provider of capital that is capable of originating customized and flexible financial products. We provide our customers with a level of service and creativity generally unavailable from other lenders. We do not participate in distribution-based commercial finance businesses, such as conduit lending and mortgage-backed securities, which are typically characterized by intense price competition and lower profit margins. Instead, we target the customer-oriented premium-pricing segment of the market.

        We believe that we have a reputation in the marketplace for delivering unique financing solutions and a high level of service to our customers in a reliable and credible fashion. Since beginning our business in 1993, we have provided $5.2$5.8 billion in financing to customers who have sought our expertise more than once.

        As a result of our focus, we have generated consistent and attractive returns on our asset base. The graph below shows our returns on average book assets, after interest expense, since 1999.

2




Return on Average Book Assets(1)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
We define "return on average book assets" as the sum of adjusted earnings and preferred dividends divided by the average book value of assets outstanding during the year. For purposes of this operating statistic, adjusted earnings in 2002 includes a $15.0 million non-cash charge related to performance-based vesting of restricted shares granted under our long-term incentive plan.

        Asset Quality and Diversification    Throughout our operating history, we have focused on maintaining diversification of our asset base by product line, asset type, obligor, property type and geographic region. Asset diversification is a key part of our risk management strategy. The pie charts below depict the diversification of our asset base based upon the total gross book value of our loan and Corporate Tenant Lease, or "CTL", assets of approximately $6.5$7.2 billion as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.

Asset Type Diversification
 Property Type Diversification
 Geographic Diversification
GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        Secured first mortgages and corporate tenant lease assets together comprise approximately 83.7%85% of our asset base. The weighted average "first dollar" and "last dollar" loan-to-value ratios on our new loan assetscommitments made during the first quarter of 2004 were 25.3%10.1% and 67.5%68.7%, respectively, as of December 31, 2003.respectively. "First dollar" and "last dollar" loan-to-value ratios represent the average beginning and ending points of our lending exposure in the aggregate capitalization of the underlying assets or companies that we finance.

        In addition, as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003, 86%2004, 78% of our corporate tenants, based on annual lease payments, were public companies or subsidiaries of public companies. Our corporate tenants include the U.S. Government and well-recognized national and international companies such as Accenture, Ltd., Charles Schwab Corporation, FedEx Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation, Nike, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Verizon Communications, Inc., Volkswagen of America and Wells Fargo Bank.

3



        Match Funding Discipline    Our objective is to match fund our liabilities and assets with respect to maturities and interest rates. This means that we seek to match the maturities of our financial obligations with the maturities of our investments. Match funding allows us to reduce the risk of having



to refinance our liabilities prior to the maturities of our assets. In addition, we match fund interest rates with like-kind debt (i.e., fixed-rate assets are financed with fixed-rate debt, and floating-rate assets are financed with floating-rate debt), through the use of hedges such as interest rate swaps, or through a combination of these strategies. This allows us to reduce the impact of changing interest rates on our earnings. Our objective is to limit volatility from a 100 basis point move in short-term interest rates to no more than 2.5% of annual adjusted earnings per share. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, a 100 basis point change in short-term interest rates would have a minimal impact on our fourthfirst quarter adjusted earnings per share.

        Significant Equity Base    We have approximately $2.4$2.5 billion of tangible book equity and a consolidated debt-to-bookdebt to book equity plus accumulated depreciation and loan loss reserves ratio of 1.7x as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. We believe that we are one of the most strongly capitalized asset-based finance companies. Our tax-advantaged structure as a real estate investment trust and our ability to operate with less overhead, as a percentage of revenues, than many other commercial finance companies enable us to generate higher returns on our invested capital without excessive reliance on leverage.

        Experienced Management    The 15 members of our executive management team have an average of more than 20 years of experience in the fields of real estate finance, private investment, capital markets, transaction structuring, risk management, legal and loan servicing, providing us with significant expertise in the key disciplines required for success in our business. We emphasize long-term, incentive-based compensation, such as performance-based grants of restricted common stock, rather than cash compensation, and none of our employees is compensated based on the volume of investment originations. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our directors and employees directly owned approximately 4.7%5.4% of our outstanding common stock on a diluted basis, which had a market value of approximately $218$221 million based upon the last reported sale price of our common stock on March 19,June 2, 2004. Our 15-member executive management team is supported by approximately 140155 employees operating from six primary offices nationwide.

        Tax-Advantaged Corporate Structure    Because of our focus on commercial real estate finance, we are able to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or "REIT," under the Internal Revenue Code. Since we are taxed as a REIT, we do not pay corporate-level taxes in most circumstances. This tax-advantaged structure enables us to produce higher returns on our invested capital compared to taxable finance companies, while utilizing significantly less leverage than most taxable finance companies. The graph below shows our returns on average common book equity since 1999.

4





Return on Average Common Book Equity(1)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
We define "return on average common book equity" as total adjusted earnings divided by the average book value of common equity outstanding during the year. Adjusted earnings in 2002 includes a $15.0 million non-cash charge related to performance-based vesting of restricted shares granted under our long-term incentive plan.

Our Target Markets and Product Lines

        We believe we are the largest dedicated participant in a $100-$150 billion niche of the approximately $2.1 trillion commercial real estate market, consisting of the $1.5 trillion commercial mortgage market and the $600 billion single-user market for corporate office and industrial facilities. Our primary product lines include structured finance, portfolio finance, corporate tenant leasing, corporate finance and loan acquisition. Our real estate lending assets consist of mortgages secured by real estate collateral, loans secured by equity interests in real estate assets, and secured and unsecured loans to corporations engaged in real estate or real estate-related businesses. Our corporate tenant lease assets consist of office and industrial facilities that we typically purchase from, and lease back to, a diversified group of creditworthy corporate tenants as a form of financing for their businesses. Our leases are generally long-term, and typically provide for all expenses at the facility to be paid by the corporate tenant on a "triple net" basis. Under a typical net lease agreement, the corporate customer agrees to pay a base monthly operating lease payment and all facility operating expenses, including taxes, maintenance and insurance.

        The pie chart below shows the composition of our asset base by product line, based on the total gross book value of our loan and CTL assets of approximately $6.5$7.2 billion as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.

5


Product Line Diversification

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


Investment Strategy

        Our investment strategy focuses on the origination of structured mortgage, corporate and lease financings backed by high-quality commercial real estate assets located in major U.S. metropolitan markets. Because we deliver the intensive structuring expertise required by our customers, we are able to avoid significant direct competition from other capital providers. We focus on developing direct relationships with borrowers and corporate tenants, as opposed to sourcing transactions through intermediaries, and offer our customers added value in the form of specific lending expertise, flexibility, certainty and post-closing support. We also take advantage of market anomalies in the real estate financing markets when we believe credit is mispriced by other providers of capital, such as the spread between lease yields and the yields on corporate tenants' underlying credit obligations. In addition, we have developed a disciplined process for screening potential investments prior to beginning our formal underwriting and commitment process called the "Six Point Methodologysm." We also have an intensive underwriting process in place for all potential investments.

Risk Management and Reserves

        We have comprehensive, proactive and hands-on risk management systems centered around a fully-integrated risk management team of over 60 professionals, including dedicated expertise in asset management, corporate credit, loan servicing, project management and engineering. We manage our risk exposure by diversifying our asset base and using conservative assumptions during our underwriting of potential investments. We utilize information received from our risk management professionals on a real-time basis to monitor the performance of our asset base and to quickly identify and address potential credit issues.

        We maintain and regularly evaluate financial reserves to protect against potential future losses. In addition to our general loss reserves, we also have asset-specific credit protection, including cash reserve accounts, cash deposits, letters of credit and allowances for doubtful accounts supporting our loan and CTL assets. Where appropriate, we typically require this incremental credit protection to be funded and/or posted at the closing of a transaction in accounts in which we have a security interest. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, accumulated loan loss reserves and other asset-specific credit protection represented an aggregate of approximately 6.73%6.58% of the gross book value of our loans. In aggregate, cash deposits, letters of credit, allowances for doubtful accounts and accumulated depreciation relating to corporate tenant lease assets represented 9.87%9.39% of the gross book value of our corporate tenant lease assets at that date.

Financing Strategy

        Our financing strategy revolves around three primary principles. First, we maintain significantly lower leverage than other commercial finance companies and a large tangible equity capital base. Second, we maintain access to a broad array of capital resources from a diverse group of lending

6



sources, such as committed secured and unsecured credit facilities, term loans, corporate bonds and our own proprietary matched funding program, iStar Asset Receivables, or "STARssm." In doing so, we seek to insulate our business from potential fluctuations in the availability of capital. Third, we seek to match fund our liabilities and assets to minimize the risk that we have to refinance our liabilities prior to the maturities of our assets, and to reduce the impact of changing interest rates on our earnings.

Adjusted Earnings and EBITDA

        Adjusted earnings represents net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders computed in accordance with GAAP, before depreciation, amortization, gain from discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures reflect our shares of adjusted earnings calculated on



the same basis. EBITDA is calculated as net income plus the sum of interest expense, depreciation and amortization, minority interest in consolidated entities, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and costs incurred in acquiring the former advisor minus income from discontinued operations and gain from discontinued operations. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the fiscal yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.

        We believe that to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical operating results, adjusted earnings and EBITDA should be examined in conjunction with net income as shown in the "Consolidated Statements of Operations" in our AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the fiscal yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. Adjusted earnings and EBITDA should not be considered as alternatives to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), as indicators of our performance, or to cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP), as measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs or available for distribution to our shareholders. We believe that adjusted earnings and EBITDA more closely approximate operating cash flow and are useful measures for investors to consider, in conjunction with net income and other GAAP measures.measures, in evaluating our financial performance. This is primarily because we are a commercial finance company that focuses on real estate lending and corporate tenant leasing; therefore, our net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) reflects significant non-cash depreciation expense on CTL assets and significant non-cash amortization expense of deferred financing costs. SeveralIn addition, several of our material borrowing arrangements contain covenants based on adjusted earnings,earnings; therefore, we must monitor adjusted earnings in order to ensure compliance with these

7



covenants. It should be noted that our manner of calculating adjusted earnings and EBITDA may differ from the calculation of similarly-titled measures by other companies.



 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 Three Months
Ended
March 31,

 For the Years Ended December 31,

 


 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 
 2004
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 


 (In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
  
 (In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
Reconciliation of Adjusted Earnings to GAAP Net Income Allocable to Common Shareholders and HPU Holders:           
Net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders $255,249 $178,362 $193,004 $180,678 $15,043 
Adjusted earnings:Adjusted earnings:             
Net income (loss) allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders (1)Net income (loss) allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders (1) $(54,716)$255,249 $178,362 $193,004 $180,678 $15,043 
Add: Joint venture incomeAdd: Joint venture income 593 991 965 937 1,603 Add: Joint venture income  593 991 965 937 1,603 
Add: DepreciationAdd: Depreciation 55,905 48,041 35,642 35,514 11,016 Add: Depreciation 15,938 55,905 48,041 35,642 34,514 11,016 
Add: Joint venture depreciation and amortizationAdd: Joint venture depreciation and amortization 7,417 4,433 4,044 3,662 365 Add: Joint venture depreciation and amortization 1,532 7,417 4,433 4,044 3,662 365 
Add: Amortization of deferred financing costsAdd: Amortization of deferred financing costs 27,180 31,676 21,303 13,528 6,121 Add: Amortization of deferred financing costs 10,312 27,180 31,676 21,303 13,528 6,121 
Less: Gain from discontinued operationsLess: Gain from discontinued operations (5,167) (717) (1,145) (2,948)  Less: Gain from discontinued operations (136) (5,167) (717) (1,145) (2,948)  
Add: Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1)(2)Add: Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1)(2)   282   Add: Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1)(2)    282   
Less: Net income allocable to class B shares(2)(3)Less: Net income allocable to class B shares(2)(3)     (826)Less: Net income allocable to class B shares(2)(3)      (826)
Add: Cost incurred in acquiring former external advisorAdd: Cost incurred in acquiring former external advisor     94,476 Add: Cost incurred in acquiring former external advisor      94,476 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted earnings allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders(3)(4)(5) $341,177 $262,768 $254,095 $230,371 $127,798 Adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders (4)(5) $(27,070)$341,177 $262,786 $254,095 $230,371 $127,798 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding 104,248 93,020 88,606 86,523 61,750 
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding (6)Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding (6) 107,468 104,248 93,020 88,606 86,523 61,750 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)
For the quarter ended March 31, 2004, net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders includes a $106.9 million charge related to CEO, CFO and ACRE Partners compensation, an $11.5 million charge for the redemption of senior notes and a $9.0 million charge for the redemption of preferred stock.

(2)
Represents one-time effect of adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" as of January 1, 2001.


(2)(3)
Prior to November 1999, adjusted earnings per common share excluded 1.00% net income allocable to our former Class B shares. The former Class B shares were exchanged for Common Stock in connection with the acquisition of TriNet and other related transactions in November 4, 1999. As a result, we now have a single class of Common Stock outstanding.

(3)(4)
For the three months ended March 31, 2004 and year ended December 31, 2003, adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholdersincludes ($447) and HPU holders includes $2,659 of adjusted earnings allocable to HPU holders.holders, respectively.

(4)(5)
For years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholders includes $3,950, $1,037 and $317, respectively, of cash paid for prepayment penalties associated with early extinguishment of debt. For the three months ended March 31, 2004 includes $9,625 of cash paid for prepayment penalties associated with early extinguishment of debt.

(5)
Includes a $15.0 million charge related to performance-based vesting of restricted shares granted under the Company's long-term incentive plan for the 12 months ended December 31, 2002.

8


(6)
In addition to the GAAP defined weighted average diluted shares outstanding these balances include an additional 147,000 shares, 371,000 shares, 372,000 shares, 372,000 shares and 1.4 million shares for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, relating to the additional dilution of joint venture shares.


 For the Years Ended December 31,
  Three Months
Ended
March 31,

 For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
  2004
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 

 (In thousands)

   
 (In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
Reconciliation of EBITDA to GAAP Net Income:           
Net income $292,157 $215,270 $229,912 $217,586 $38,886 
Reconciliation of EBITDA to GAAP Net Income (Loss):             
Net income (loss) $(35,116)$292,157 $215,270 $229,912 $217,586 $38,886 
Add: Interest expense 194,999 185,375 169,974 173,549 91,112  52,566 194,999 185,375 169,974 173,549 91,112 
Add: Depreciation and amortization 55,286 46,948 34,573 33,529 10,219  16,043 55,286 46,948 34,573 33,529 10,219 
Add: Minority interest in consolidated entities 249 162 218 195 41  133 249 162 218 195 41 
Add: Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   282       282   
Add: Costs incurred in acquiring former advisor     94,476       94,476 
Less: Income from discontinued operations (1,916) (7,614) (10,429) (7,960) (853)
Less: Loss (income) from discontinued operations 233 (1,916) (7,614) (10,429) (7,960) (853)
Less: Gain from discontinued operations (5,167) (717) (1,145) (2,948)   (136) (5,167) (717) (1,145) (2,948)  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
EBITDA(1) $535,608 $439,424 $423,385 $413,951 $233,881  $33,723 $535,608 $439,424 $423,385 $413,951 $233,881 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)
EBITDA should be examined in conjunction with net income as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our performance, or to cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, nor is this measure indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs or available for distribution to shareholders. It should be noted that our manner of calculating EBITDA may differ from the calculations of similarly-titled measures by other companies.

Recent Developments

        On March 30,May 10, 2004, we issued $250.0an additional $25.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.125%Series A Senior Floating Rate Notes due 20112007 in a private placement. We used theThe net proceeds were used to repay outstanding secured indebtedness which was used for general corporate purposes and to fund investment activity.

        On March 12, 2004, we issued $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2007 in a private placement. The notes bear interest at a rate per annum equal to three month LIBOR plus 1.25%. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay secured indebtedness.

        On March 9, 2004, we issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.70% Senior Notes due 2014 in a private placement. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay outstanding secured indebtedness.

        On March 1, 2004, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our 7.50% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, having a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. We used the net proceeds of the offering to redeem $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.75% Senior Notes due 2008 on March 29, 2004.

        On February 23, 2004, we redeemed all 2,000,000 outstanding shares of our 9.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and all 1,300,000 outstanding shares of our 9.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The redemption price for the Series B Preferred Stock was $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date of $0.46 per share. The redemption price for the Series C Preferred Stock was $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date of $0.45 per share. The redemption was funded with the proceeds of the issuance of our Series H Variable Rate Preferred Stock, which was subsequently redeemed.

        We sold the outstanding $350 million principal amount at maturity of 4.875% Series A Senior Notes due 2009 to Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities, LLC, Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as Initial Purchasers on January 23, 2004, pursuant to a purchase agreement, dated January 15, 2004, between the Initial Purchasers and us. The Initial Purchasers subsequently resold the Series A Notes in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act and other available exemptions under the Securities Act. We and the Initial Purchasers also entered into a

9



registration rights agreement pursuant to which we agreed to offer to exchange the Series B Notes which are registered under the Securities Act for the Series A Notes and also granted holders of Series A Notes rights under some circumstances to have resales of Series A Notes registered under the Securities Act. The exchange offer is intended to satisfy certain of our obligations under the registration rights agreement. See "The Exchange Offer—Purpose and Effects."

        We issued the Series A Notes under an indenture dated as of January 23, 2004, between iStar Financial Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee. The Series B Notes also are being issued under the indenture and are entitled to the benefits of the indenture. The form and terms of the Series B Notes will be identical in all material respects with the form and terms of the Series A Notes, except that (1) the Series B Notes will have been registered under the Securities Act and, therefore, will not bear legends describing restrictions on transferring them, and (2) holders of Series B Notes will not be, and upon the consummation of the exchange offer, holders of Series A Notes will no longer be, entitled to certain rights under the registration rights agreement intended for the holders of unregistered securities. The exchange offer shall be deemed consummated upon the delivery by us to the exchange agent under the indenture of Series B Notes in the same aggregate principal amount as the aggregate principal amount of Series A Notes that are validly tendered by holders of them in response to the exchange offer. See "The Exchange Offer—Termination of Certain Rights" and "—Procedures for Tendering" and "Description of the Series B Notes."

        The proceeds we received from the issuance of the Series A Notes were used to repay outstanding secured indebtedness. We will receive no proceeds from the exchange of Series B Notes for the Series A Notes pursuant to the exchange offer.

        When we refer to "the Notes" in this prospectus, we refer to both the Series A Notes and the Series B Notes, unless it is clear from what we are saying that the term refers only to a particular series of Notes.

        Throughout this offering memorandum, we refer to these offerings and redemptions as the "Subsequent Transactions."

First Quarter Earnings Charges

        As we have previously announced, we expect to incurWe incurred charges to adjusted earnings and GAAP earnings allocable to common shareholders and the HPU holders of $109.0$125.5 million and $127.4 million, respectively in the first quarter of 2004. These charges include an estimated charge of $80.0$86.0 million relating to the full vesting of 2.0 million incentive shares awarded to our Chief Executive Officer under his March 2001 employment agreement with us. The first quarter charges include a charge of $10.0and $10.1 million relating to a one-time award of common stock granted to our Chief Executive Officer in connection with a new three-year employment agreement with us that will go into effect when the current agreement expires on March 30, 2004.us. The first quarter charges also include $4.0$10.8 million related to the vesting of 100,000 restricted performance shares awarded to our Chief Financial Officer when she joined us in 2002. In addition, we will issue2002 and the issuance of 155,000 shares of common stock to the principals of the former ACRE Partners, a company that we acquired in 2000. We estimate that the charge for the 155,000 shares will be approximately $6.2 million (assuming a common stock price of $40.00 on the vesting date).



        Finally, the estimatedThe first quarter charges include a charge of $9.0 million relating to the redemption of our 9.375% Series B and 9.20% Series C Preferred Stock. This amount reflects the discount at which we currently reflect the Series B and Series C Preferred Stock in our financial statements.

        The estimated first quarter 2004 charges that we previously announced do notalso include the charge that we will recognizerecognized as a result of the redemption of a portion of our 8.75% Senior Notes due 2008 with the net proceeds of the offering of our 7.50% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.Stock on March 29, 2004. We expect to recognizerecognized an aggregate charge to first quarter 2004 net income and adjusted earnings of approximately $11.5 million and $9.6 million, respectively, in connection with the redemption, due to

10



the redemption premium we will pay. The redemption was completed on March 29, 2004; accordingly, we will also recognize the charge inpaid.

        Finally, the first quarter charges also include a charge of 2004.$9.0 million relating to the redemption of our 9.375% Series B and 9.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. This amount reflects the discount at which we reflected the Series B and Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock in our financial statements.


        Our principal executive offices are located at 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036, and our telephone number is (212) 930-9400. Our website is www.istarfinancial.com. The information on our website is not considered part of this offering memorandum. Our six primary regional offices are located in Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Hartford and San Francisco. iStar Asset Services, our loan servicing subsidiary, is located in Hartford, and iStar Real Estate Services, our corporate facilities management division, is headquartered in Atlanta.

11




The Exchange Offer


 

 

 

The Exchange Offer

 

We are offering to exchange our 4.875%5.125% Series B Senior Notes due 20092011 for identical principal amounts of our 4.875%5.125% Series A Senior Notes due 2009.2011. At the date of this prospectus, $350$250 million principal amount at maturity of Series A Senior Notes are outstanding. See "The Exchange Offer—Terms of the Exchange Offer."

Expiration of Exchange Offer

 

5:00 p.m., New York time, on            , 2004, unless the exchange offer is extended (the day on which the exchange offer expires being the expiration date). See "The Exchange Offer—Expiration Date; Extension; Termination; Amendments."

Conditions of the Exchange Offer

 

The exchange offer is not conditioned upon any minimum principal amount of Series A Notes being tendered for exchange. However, the exchange offer is subject to certain customary conditions, which we may waive. See "The Exchange Offer—Procedures for Tendering."

Accrued Interest on the Series A Notes

 

The Series B Notes will bear interest at the rate of 4.875%5.125% per annum from and including their date of issuance. When the first interest payment is made with regard to the Series B Notes, we will also pay interest on the Series A Notes which are exchanged, from the date they were issued or the most recent interest date on which interest had been paid (if applicable) to, but not including, the day the Series B Notes are issued. Interest on the Series A Notes which are exchanged will cease to accrue on the day prior to the day on which the Series B Notes are issued. The interest rate on the Series A Notes may increase under certain circumstances if we are not in compliance with our obligations under the registration rights agreement. See "Description of the Series B Notes."

Procedures for Tendering Series A Notes

 

A holder of Series A Notes who wishes to accept the exchange offer must complete, sign and date a letter of transmittal, or a facsimile of one, in accordance with the instructions contained under "The Exchange Offer—Procedures for Tendering" and in the letter of transmittal, and deliver the letter of transmittal, or facsimile, together with the Series A Notes and any other required documentation to the exchange agent at the address set forth in "The Exchange Offer—Exchange Agent.Agent"; or must comply with the automated tender offer program procedures of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") described in "The Exchange Offer—Procedures For Tendering." Series A Notes may be delivered physically or by confirmation of book-entry delivery of the Series A Notes to the exchange agent's account at The Depository Trust Company ("DTC").DTC. By executing a letter of transmittal or by following the procedures for tendering through DTC, a holder will represent to us that, among other things, the person acquiring the Series B Notes will be doing so in the ordinary course of the person's business, whether or not the person is the holder, that neither the holder nor any other person is engaged in, or intends to engage in, or has an arrangement or understanding with any person to participate in, the distribution of the Series B Notes and that neither the holder nor any such other person is an "affiliate," as defined under Rule 405 of the Securities Act, of ours. Each broker or dealer that receives Series B Notes for its own account in exchange for Series A Notes which were acquired by the broker or dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of the Series B Notes. See "The Exchange Offe—Offer—Procedures for Tendering" and "Sales of Series B Notes Received by Broker-Dealers."
   

12




Guaranteed Delivery Procedures

 

Eligible holders of Series A Notes who wish to tender their Series A Notes and (1) whose Series A Notes are not immediately available or (2) who cannot deliver their Series A Notes or any other documents required by the letter of transmittal to the exchange agent prior to the expiration date (or complete the procedure for book-entry transfer on a timely basis), may tender their Series A Notes according to the guaranteed delivery procedures described in the letter of transmittal. (Note: if tender is made through DTC's automated tender offer program, this process is achieved through that program.) See "The Exchange Offer—Guaranteed Delivery Procedures."

Acceptance of Series A Notes and Delivery of Series B Notes

 

Upon satisfaction or waiver of all conditions to the exchange offer, we will accept any and all Series A Notes that are properly tendered in response to the exchange offer prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date. The Series B Notes issued pursuant to the exchange offer will be delivered promptly after acceptance of the Series A Notes. See "The Exchange Offer—Procedures for Tendering."

Withdrawal Rights

 

Tenders of Series A Notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date. See "The Exchange Offer—Withdrawal of Tenders."

The Exchange Agent

 

U.S. Bank Trust National Association is the exchange agent. The address and telephone number of the exchange agent are set forth in "The Exchange Offer—Exchange Agent."

Fees and Expenses

 

We will bear all expenses incident to our consummation of the exchange offer and compliance with the registration rights agreement. We will also pay any transfer taxes which are applicable to the exchange offer (but not transfer taxes due to transfers of Series A Notes or Series B Notes by the holder). See "The Exchange Offer—Fees and Expenses."

Resales of the Series B Notes.

 

Based on interpretations by the staff of the SEC set forth in no-action letters issued to third parties, we believe Series B Notes issued pursuant to the exchange offer in exchange for Series A Notes may be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by the holder (other than (1) a broker-dealer who purchased the Series A Notes directly from us for resale pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act or another exemption under the Securities Act or (2) a person that is an affiliate of ours, as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act), without registration or the need to deliver a prospectus under the Securities Act, provided that the holder is acquiring the Series B Notes in the ordinary course of business and is not participating, and has no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate, in a distribution of the Series B Notes. Each broker-dealer that receives Series B Notes for its own account in exchange for Series A Notes that were acquired by the broker as a result of market-making or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of the Series B Notes. See "The Exchange Offer—Purpose and Effects" and "Sales of Series B Notes Received By Broker-Dealers."

13




The Series B Notes

        The exchange offer applies to $350$250 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of Series A Notes. The terms of the Series B Notes are identical in all material respects with those of the Series A Notes, except for certain transfer restrictions and rights relating to the exchange of the Series A Notes for Series B Notes. The Series B Notes will evidence the same debt as the Series A Notes and will be entitled to the benefits of the indenture under which both the Series A Notes were, and the Series B Notes will be, issued. See "Description of the Series B Notes."


Issuer

 

iStar Financial Inc.

Securities Offered

 

$350,000,000250,000,000 principal amount of 4.875%5.125% Series B Senior Notes due 2009.2011.

Maturity

 

January 15, 2009.        April 1, 2011

Interest Rate

 

4.875%5.125% per year (calculated using a 360-day year).

Interest Payment Dates

 

Each January 15April 1 and July 15October 1 beginning on July 15,October 1, 2004. Interest will accrue from the date of issue.

Ranking

 

The Notes are our unsecured senior obligations and rank
pari passu to our existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness and, to the extent we incur subordinated indebtedness in the future, senior to such indebtedness. The Notes will be effectively subordinated to all of our secured indebtedness and all indebtedness of our subsidiaries. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003, giving pro forma effect to this offering and the Subsequent Transactions and the use of proceeds from this offering and the Subsequent Transactions,2004, the aggregate amount of outstanding indebtedness of our subsidiaries would have beenwas approximately $2.2$2.7 billion.

Optional Redemption

 

The Notes are redeemable prior to their maturity at a make-whole premium.

Change of Control Offer

 

If a change in control of our Company occurs, we must give holders of the Notes the opportunity to sell us their Notes at 101% of their face amount, plus accrued interest.

Certain Indenture Provisions

 

The indenture governing the Notes contains covenants limiting our and our subsidiaries' ability to:

 

 


 

incur indebtedness;

 

 


 

issue preferred stock of subsidiaries;

 

 


 

pay dividends or make other distributions;

 

 


 

repurchase equity interests or subordinated indebtedness;

 

 


 

enter into transactions with affiliates;

 

 


 

merge or consolidate with another person; or

 

 


 

sell, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets.

 

 

These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions. See "Description of Notes—Certain Covenants."

Risk Factors

 

Investing in the Notes involves substantial risks. See "Risk Factors" in this prospectus for a description of certain of the risks you should consider before investing in the Notes.

14




RISK FACTORS

        This section describes some, but not all, of the risks of purchasing Notes in the offering. You should carefully consider these risks, in addition to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this document, before purchasing Notes. In connection with the forward-looking statements that appear in this document, you should carefully review the factors discussed below and the cautionary statements referred to in "Forward-Looking Statements."

If You Fail to Exchange Your Series A Notes, They Will Continue to be Restricted Securities and You May Experience Difficulty Selling Them Following the Exchange Offer

        Series A Notes which you do not tender in the exchange offer will continue to be restricted securities. After the completion of the exchange offer, we will not have any further obligation to issue Series B Notes to you in exchange for your Series A Notes. You may not offer or sell Series A Notes except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. Because we anticipate that most holders of Series A Notes will elect to exchange those notes for Series B Notes, and that most potential investors in the Notes will prefer to purchase registered Series AB Notes rather than purchase unregistered Series BA Notes, you may experience difficulty selling your Series A Notes following the exchange offer.

We Have Other Indebtedness

        As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to this offering and the Subsequent Transactions and the use of proceeds therefrom,2004, our outstanding debt will bewas approximately $4.1$4.6 billion. Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest on, or to refinance, our indebtedness depends on our future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control.

The Notes Will Be Structurally Subordinated to Subsidiary Debt

        The Notes are not guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries hold a substantial portion of our assets. After giving pro forma effect to the offering and the Subsequent Transactions, ourOur subsidiaries would have had approximately $2.2$2.7 billion of indebtedness outstanding at DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. Creditors of a subsidiary are entitled to be paid what is due to them before assets of the subsidiary become available for creditors of its parent. In addition, if we were to become insolvent, the lenders on a credit facility, under which iStar Financial and one of its subsidiaries are co-borrowers, would receive payments from the stock of the co-borrower subsidiary and our leasing subsidiary that has been pledged as collateral under that facility before you receive payments.

Ability to Repurchase Notes Upon Change of Control May Be Limited

        Upon a change of control, each holder of Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase the holder's Notes. If there were a change of control, but we did not have sufficient funds to pay the repurchase price for all of the Notes which were tendered, that failure would constitute an event of default under the indenture. Therefore, a change of control at a time when we could not pay for Notes which were tendered as a result of the change of control could result in holders of Notes receiving substantially less than the principal amount of the Notes.

As a REIT, We Must Distribute a Portion of Our Income to Our Stockholders and We Have Substantial Additional Capacity to Make Restricted Payments

        We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our taxable income to our stockholders to maintain our REIT status. As a result, those earnings will not be available to pay principal or interest

15



on the Notes. Our taxable income has historically been lower than the cash flow generated by our business activities, primarily because our taxable income is reduced by non-cash expenses, such as



depreciation and amortization. As a result, our dividend payout ratio as a percentage of free cash flow has generally been lower than our payout ratio as a percentage of taxable income. However, certain of our credit facilities and the indenture governing the Notes permit us to distribute up to 95% of our adjusted earnings. In addition, although our debt instruments contain limitations on our ability to make dividends in excess of these distributions or to repurchase our outstanding equity securities, as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003, after giving effect to the Subsequent Transactions,2004 the restricted payments covenant in the indenture governing the Notes currently permits us to make approximately $778.8$831.0 million of such other distributions or repurchases.

There is No Public Market for the Notes

        If the Notes are traded after their initial issuance, they may trade at a discount from their initial offering price, depending upon prevailing interest rates, the market for similar securities, our performance and certain other factors. Historically, there has been substantial volatility in the prices of corporate debt securities, and the price of the Notes is likely to be affected by factors which affect the price of corporate debt securities generally. We do not intend to apply for listing of the Notes on any securities exchange or for inclusion of the Notes on any automated quotation system.

We Are Subject to Risks Relating to Our Lending Business.

        We may suffer a loss if a borrower defaults on a non-recourse loan or on a loan that is not secured by underlying real estate.    In the event of a default by a borrower on a non-recourse loan, we will only have recourse to the real estate assets securing the loan. For this purpose, we consider loans made to special purpose entities formed solely for the purpose of holding and financing particular assets to be non-recourse loans. If the underlying asset value is below the loan amount, we will suffer a loss. Conversely, we sometimes make loan investments that are unsecured or are secured by equity interests in the borrowing entities. These loans are subject to the risk that other lenders may be directly secured by the real estate assets of the borrower. In the event of a default, those secured lenders would have priority over us with respect to the proceeds of a sale of the underlying real estate.

        In the cases described above, we may lack control over the underlying asset securing our loan or the underlying assets of the borrower prior to a default, and, as a result, their value may be reduced by acts or omissions by owners or managers of the assets. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003, 88.1%2004, 87.7% of our loans are non-recourse, based upon the gross carrying value of our loan assets, and 11.9%10.7% of our total investments, based on gross carrying value, consist of loans that are unsecured or secured by equity interests in the borrowing entity.

        We may suffer a loss in the event of a default or bankruptcy of a borrower, particularly in cases where the borrower has incurred debt that is senior to our loan.    If a borrower defaults on our loan but does not have sufficient assets to satisfy our loan, we may suffer a loss of principal or interest. In the event of a borrower bankruptcy, we may not have full recourse to the assets of the borrower, or the assets of the borrower may not be sufficient to satisfy our loan. In addition, certain of our loans are subordinate to other debt of the borrower. If a borrower defaults on our loan or on debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. Where debt senior to our loans exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies (through "standstill" periods) and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy and borrower litigation can significantly increase the time needed for us to acquire underlying collateral in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process.

16



        We are subject to the risk that provisions of our loan agreements may be unenforceable.    Our rights and obligations with respect to our loans are governed by written loan agreements and related documentation. It is possible that a court could determine that one or more provisions of a loan



agreement are unenforceable, such as a loan prepayment provision or the provisions governing our security interest in the underlying collateral. If this were to happen with respect to a material asset or group of assets, we could be adversely affected.

        We are subject to the risks associated with loan participations, such as less than full control rights.    Some of our assets are participating interests in loans in which we share the rights, obligations and benefits of the loan with other participating lenders. We may need the consent of these parties to exercise our rights under such loans, including rights with respect to amendment of loan documentation, enforcement proceedings in the event of a default and the institution of, and control over, foreclosure proceedings. Similarly, a majority of the participants may be able to take actions to which we object but to which we will be bound if our participation interest represents a minority interest. We may be adversely affected by this lack of full control.

We Are Subject to Risks Relating to Our Corporate Tenant Lease Business.

        Lease expirations, lease defaults and lease terminations may adversely affect our revenue.    Lease expirations, lease defaults and lease terminations may result in reduced revenues if the lease payments received from replacement corporate tenants are less than the lease payments received from the expiring, defaulting or terminating corporate tenants. In addition, lease defaults by one or more significant corporate tenants, lease terminations by corporate tenants following events of casualty or takings by eminent domain, or the failure of corporate tenants under expiring leases to elect to renew their leases, could cause us to experience long periods with no revenue from a facility and to incur substantial capital expenditures in order to obtain replacement corporate tenants.

        As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003, 12.8%2004, 14.6% of our annualized total revenues for the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 were derived from our five largest corporate tenant customers. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, the percentage of our revenues (based on total revenues for the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, annualized) that are subject to expiring leases during each year from 2004 through 2008 is as follows:

2004 3.0% 1.7%
2005 1.6% 1.2%
2006 4.6% 4.3%
2007 2.8% 3.1%
2008 2.1% 2.0%

        We may need to make significant capital improvements to our corporate facilities in order to remain competitive.    Our corporate facilities may face competition from newer, more updated facilities. In order to remain competitive, we may need to make significant capital improvements to our existing corporate facilities. In addition, in the event we need to re-lease a corporate facility, we may need to make significant tenant improvements, including conversions of single tenant buildings to multi-tenant buildings. The costs of these improvements could adversely affect our financial performance.

        Our ownership interests in corporate facilities are illiquid, hindering our ability to mitigate a loss.    Since our ownership interests in corporate facilities are illiquid, we may lack the necessary flexibility to vary our investment strategy promptly to respond to changes in market conditions. In addition, if we have to foreclose on an asset or if we desire to sell it in an effort to recover or mitigate a loss, we may be unable to do so at all, or only at a discount.

17



We Are Subject to Risks Relating to Our Asset Concentration.

        As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, the average size of our lending investments was $33.7$34.4 million and the average size of our leasing investments was $24.3$27.3 million. No single investment represented more than 3.2%4.2% of our total revenues for the fiscal quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. While our asset base is diversified by product line, asset type, obligor, property type and geographic location, it is possible that



if we suffer losses on a portion of our larger assets, our financial performance could be adversely impacted.

Because We Must Distribute a Portion of Our Income, We Will Continue to Need Additional Debt and/or Equity Capital to Grow.

        We must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our stockholders to maintain our REIT status. As a result, those earnings will not be available to fund investment activities. We have historically funded our investments by borrowing from financial institutions and raising capital in the public and private capital markets. We expect to continue to fund our investments this way. If we fail to obtain funds from these sources, it could limit our ability to grow, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of our common stock and/or our ability to pay interest and principal on the Notes.

Our Growth Is Dependent on Leverage, Which May Create Other Risks.

        Our success is dependent, in part, upon our ability to grow our assets through the use of leverage. Our ability to obtain the leverage necessary for execution of our business plan will ultimately depend upon our ability to maintain interest coverage ratios meeting market underwriting standards that will vary according to lenders' assessments of our creditworthiness and the terms of the borrowings. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our debt-to-bookdebt to book equity plus accumulated depreciation and loan loss reserves ratio was 1.7x and our total debt obligations outstanding were approximately $4.11$4.6 billion. Our charter does not limit the amount of indebtedness which we may incur. Our Board of Directors has overall responsibility for our financing strategy. Stockholder approval is not required for changes to our financing strategy. If our Board of Directors decided to increase our leverage, it could lead to reduced or negative cash flow and reduced liquidity.

        The percentage of leverage used will vary depending on our estimate of the stability of iStar Financial's cash flow. To the extent that changes in market conditions cause the cost of such financing to increase relative to the income that can be derived from the assets originated, we may reduce the amount of our leverage.

        Leverage creates an opportunity for increased net income, but at the same time creates risks. For example, leveraging magnifies changes in our net worth. We will incur leverage only when there is an expectation that it will enhance returns, although there can be no assurance that our use of leverage will prove to be beneficial. Moreover, there can be no assurance that we will be able to meet our debt service obligations and, to the extent that we cannot, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets or a financial loss if we are required to liquidate assets at a commercially inopportune time.

        We and our subsidiaries are parties to agreements and debt instruments that restrict future indebtedness and the payment of dividends, including indirect restrictions (through, for example, covenants requiring the maintenance of specified levels of net worth and earnings to debt service ratios) and direct restrictions. As a result, in the event of a deterioration in our financial condition, these agreements or debt instruments could restrict our ability to pay dividends. Moreover, if we fail to pay dividends as required by the Internal Revenue Code, whether as a result of restrictive covenants in our debt instruments or otherwise, we may lose our status as a REIT. For more information regarding the consequences of loss of REIT status, please read the risk factor entitled "We May Be Subject to Adverse Consequences if We Fail to Qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust."

18



We Utilize Interest Rate Hedging Arrangements Which May Adversely Affect Our Borrowing Cost and Expose Us to Other Risks.

        We have variable rate lending assets and variable rate debt obligations. These assets and liabilities create a natural hedge against changes in variable interest rates. This means that as interest rates increase, we earn more on our variable rate lending assets and pay more on our variable rate debt obligations and, conversely, as interest rates decrease, we earn less on our variable rate lending assets



and pay less on our variable rate debt obligations. When our variable rate debt obligations exceed our variable rate lending assets, we utilize derivative instruments to limit the impact of changing interest rates on our net income. We do not use derivative instruments to hedge assets or for speculative purposes. The derivatives instruments we use are typically in the form of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps. Interest rate swaps effectively change variable rate debt obligations to fixed rate debt obligations. Interest rate caps effectively limit the maximum interest rate on variable rate debt obligations.

        The primary risks from our use of derivative instruments is the risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement could default on its obligation and the risk that we may have to pay certain costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if a hedging arrangement is terminated by us. As a matter of policy, we enter into hedging arrangements with counterparties that are large, creditworthy financial institutions typically rated at least "AA/Aa2" by Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Service, respectively. Our hedging strategy is monitored by our Audit Committee on behalf of our Board of Directors and may be changed by the Board of Directors without stockholder approval.

        Developing an effective strategy for dealing with movements in interest rates is complex and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with such fluctuations. There can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

We Face a Risk of Liability Under Environmental Laws.

        Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner of real estate (including, in certain circumstances, a secured lender that succeeds to ownership or control of a property) may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, under or in its property. Those laws typically impose cleanup responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or control party knew of or was responsible for the release or presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigation, remediation or removal of those substances may be substantial. The owner or control party of a site may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site. Certain environmental laws also impose liability in connection with the handling of or exposure to asbestos-containing materials, pursuant to which third parties may seek recovery from owners of real properties for personal injuries associated with asbestos-containing materials. Absent succeeding to ownership or control of real property, a secured lender is not likely to be subject to any of these forms of environmental liability.

Adverse Changes in General Economic Conditions Can Adversely Affect Our Business.

        Our success is dependent upon the general economic conditions in the geographic areas in which a substantial number of our investments are located. Adverse changes in national economic conditions or in the economic conditions of the regions in which we conduct substantial business likely would have an adverse effect on real estate values and, accordingly, our business.

We May Be Subject to Adverse Consequences If We Fail to Qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust.

        We intend to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We have received an opinion of our legal counsel, Clifford Chance US LLP, that, based on the assumptions and

19



representations described in "Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences," our existing legal organization and our actual and proposed method of operation, enable us to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. Investors should be aware, however, that opinions of counsel are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or any court. The opinion only represents the view of our counsel based on their review and analysis of existing law, that includes no controlling precedents. Furthermore, both the validity of the opinion and our qualification as a REIT



will depend on our continuing ability to meet various requirements concerning, among other things, the ownership of our outstanding stock, the nature of our assets, the sources of our income and the amount of our distributions to our stockholders. See "Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences—Taxation of iStar Financial—General."

        If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to our stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax, including any applicable minimum tax, on our taxable income with respect to any such taxable year for which the statute of limitations remains open at regular corporate rates. Unless entitled to relief under certain Internal Revenue Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from treatment as a real estate investment trust for the four subsequent taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. As a result, cash available for payment of interest and principal on the Notes would be reduced for each of the years involved. Furthermore, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause the Board of Directors to revoke the REIT election. See "Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences."

        Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and property, and may be subject to certain federal taxes. See "Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences—Taxation of iStar Financial—General."

Quarterly Results May Fluctuate and May Not Be Indicative of Future Quarterly Performance.

        Our quarterly operating results could fluctuate; therefore, you should not rely on past quarterly results to be indicative of our performance in future quarters. Factors that could cause quarterly operating results to fluctuate include, among others, variations in our investment origination volume, variations in the timing of prepayments, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions.

20




RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



Years Ended December 31,

Three Months
Ended March 31
2004


2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends(1)—(2)2.1x1.8x1.9x1.8x1.1x(3)
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)—(2)2.5x2.1x2.3x2.2x1.4x(3)

(1)
For the purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, "earnings" consist of income from continuing operations before adjustment for minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries, or income or loss from equity investees, income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle plus "fixed charges" and certain other adjustments. "Fixed charges" consist of interest incurred on all indebtedness related to continuing operations (including amortization of original issue discount) and the implied interest component of our rent obligations in the years presented.

(2)
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends and the ratio of earnings to fixed charges were less than 1:1 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The coverage deficiencies for the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends and the ratio of earnings to fixed charges were $60.7 million and $41.1 million, respectively. These ratios include the effect of CEO, CFO and ACRE Partners compensation of $106.9 million, 8.75% Senior Notes due 2008 redemption charge of $11.5 million (and the preferred stock redemption charge of $9.0 million for the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and perferred stock dividends). Excluding these charges, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends and the ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have been 1.6x and 2.5x, respectively.

(3)
Includes the effect of a non-recurring, non-cash charge in the amount of approximately $94.5 million relating to our November 1999 acquisition of the former external advisor to our company. Excluding these charges, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends would have been 2.5x and 2.0x, respectively.


USE OF PROCEEDS

        We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange of Series B Notes for Series A Notes pursuant to the exchange offer. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the Series A Notes to repay outstanding secured indebtedness. Of the indebtedness repaid by that offering, $150.8 millionwhich was incurred during the past yearused for working capital purposes.general corporate purposes and to fund investment activity.


ABSENCE OF PUBLIC MARKET

        The Series B Notes will be new securities for which there is no established trading market. We currently do not intend to list the Series B Notes on any securities exchange or to arrange for the Series B Notes to be quoted on any quotation system. Although the Initial Purchasers have informed us that they currently intend to make a market in the Notes, they are not obligated to do so and they may discontinue market-making activity at any time without notice. In addition, market-making activities may be limited during the exchange offer or the pendency of a shelf registration statement required by the registration rights agreement, if it is filed. Accordingly, it is not likely that an active trading market for the Series B Notes will develop or, if such a market develops, that it will provide significant liquidity to holders of notes.

21




iSTAR FINANCIAL INC.

Overview

        We are the leading publicly-traded finance company focused exclusively on the commercial real estate industry. We provide custom-tailored financing to high-end private and corporate owners of high-quality real estate nationwide, including senior and junior mortgage debt, senior mezzanine and subordinatedmezzanine corporate capital, and corporate net lease financing. Our objective is to generate consistent and attractive returns on our invested capital by providing innovative and value-added financing solutions to our customers. We deliver customized financial products and "one-call" responsiveness post-closing to sophisticated real estate borrowers and corporate customers who require a high level of creativity and service. Our ability to provide value-added financial solutions has consistently enabled us to realize margins and returns on capital that are more attractive than those earned by many other commercial real estate finance companies. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our total enterprise value (market value of equity plus book value of preferred stock and debt, less cash balances) was $8.7$9.7 billion, and our EBITDA and net income for the twelve monthsquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 were $535.6$33.7 million and $292.2($53.8) million, respectively.

        We began our business in 1993 through private investment funds formed to take advantage of the lack of well-capitalized lenders capable of servicing the needs of high-end customers in our markets. During our eleven-year history we have structured or originated $9.4$10 billion of financing commitments.

        By capitalizing on our competitive strengths, we have delivered consistent financial performance, developed a high-quality, diversified asset base and established ourselves as a reliable provider of financing solutions for our customers. Our disciplined approach to our business has enabled us to adapt to adverse economic and real estate market conditions while consistently delivering attractive risk-adjusted returns on our invested capital. We have maintained strong credit statistics and have consistently grown our EBITDA since the quarter ended June 1998, our first quarter as a public company. Between that quarter and the quarter ended December 31, 2003, we grew our EBITDA and net income from approximately $30.7 million and $19.9 million, respectively, to $140.5 million and $79.6 million, respectively.

22



        The graph below shows our EBITDA and net income since 1999.


EBITDA(1) and Net Income

        GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
EBITDA is calculated as net income plus the sum of interest expense, depreciation and amortization, minority interest in consolidated entities, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and costs incurred in acquiring the former advisor minus income from discontinued operations and gain from discontinued operations.

(2)
EBITDA and net income include a $15.0 million non-cash charge related to performance-based vesting of restricted shares granted under our long-term incentive plan.

Competitive Strengths

        We believe the following competitive strengths distinguish our business model from other commercial finance enterprises and contribute to our ability to generate consistent returns on our invested capital.

        Creative Capital Solutions    We target markets where customers require a knowledgeable provider of capital that is capable of originating customized and flexible financial products. We provide our customers with a level of service and creativity generally unavailable from other lenders. We do not participate in distribution-based commercial finance businesses such as conduit lending and mortgage-backed securities, which are typically characterized by intense price competition and lower profit margins. Instead, we target the customer-oriented premium-pricing segment of the market.

        We believe that we have a reputation in the marketplace for delivering unique financing solutions and a high level of service to our customers in a reliable and credible fashion. Since beginning our business in 1993, we have provided $5.2$5.8 billion in financing to customers who have sought our expertise more than once.

        As a result of our focus, we have generated consistent and attractive returns on our asset base. The graph below shows our returns on average book assets, after interest expense, since 1999.

23





Return on Average Book Assets(1)

        GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
We define "return on average book assets" as the sum of adjusted earnings and preferred dividends divided by the average book value of assets outstanding during the year. Adjusted earnings in 2002 includes a $15.0 million non-cash charge related to performance-based vesting of restricted shares granted under our long-term incentive plan.

        Asset Quality and Diversification    Throughout our operating history, we have focused on maintaining diversification of our asset base by product line, asset type, obligor, property type and geographic region. Asset diversification is a key part of our risk management strategy. The pie charts below depict the diversification of our asset base, based upon the gross book value of our loan and CTL assets of approximately $6.5$7.2 billion as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.

Asset Type Diversification
 Property Type Diversification
 Geographic Diversification
GRAPHICGRAPHIC

24



        The table below reflects the diversification of our asset base as represented by our 25 largest assets by revenue. The table shows the percentage these assets represent of our total revenues for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.

 
 Top 25
Assets %
Revenue

 
Collateral Type   

Office

 

16

%
Hotel   8%
Residential   65%
Industrial/R&D   3%
Retail   1%
OtherEntertainment/Leisure   45%
Conference Centers  1%

Asset Type

 

 

 

Corporate Tenant Leases

 

1923

%
First Mortgages 1110%
Corporate/Partnership Loans   8%
Second Mortgages  0%

Geographic Region

 

 

 
West   7%
South   67%
Southeast   5%
Northeast   8%
Mid-Atlantic   4%
Northwest   2%
Other   7%

        Secured first mortgages and corporate tenant lease assets together comprise approximately 83.7%85% of our asset base. The weighted average "first dollar" and "last dollar" loan-to-value ratios on our new loan assetscommitments made during the first quarter of 2004 were 25.3%10.1% and 67.5%68.7%, respectively, as of December 31, 2003.respectively. "First dollar" and "last dollar" loan-to-value ratios represent the average beginning and ending points of our lending exposure in the aggregate capitalization of the underlying assets or companies that we finance.

        In addition, as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003, 86%2004, 78% of our corporate tenants, based on annual lease payments were public companies or subsidiaries of public companies. Our corporate tenants include the U.S. Government and well-recognized national and international companies such as Accenture, Ltd., Charles Schwab Corporation, FedEx Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation, Nike, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Verizon Communications, Inc., Volkswagen of America and Wells Fargo Bank.

        We assign two separate quarterly risk ratings to our structured finance assets using a "one" to "five" scale. We assign a rating representing our evaluation of the risk of principal loss, and a rating representing performance compared to original underwriting. Corporate tenant lease risk ratings reflect our assessment of the quality and longevity of the cash flow yield from the asset. Assets with risk ratings of "four" and "five" indicate management time and attention is required, and a risk rating of "five" denotes a potential problem asset. Each newly-originated asset is typically assigned an initial rating of "three," or average. In addition to the rating system, we maintain a "watch list" of assets that require highly proactive asset management.

        Based upon our fourthfirst quarter 20032004 review, the weighted average risk ratings of our structured finance assets was 2.672.62 for risk of principal loss and 3.153.16 for performance compared to original

25




underwriting. The weighted average risk rating for corporate tenant lease assets was 2.622.52 at the end of the fourthfirst quarter.

        Match Funding Discipline    Our objective is to match fund our liabilities and assets with respect to maturities and interest rates. This means that we seek to match the maturities of our financial obligations with the maturities of our investments. Match funding allows us to reduce the risk of having to refinance our liabilities prior to the maturities of our assets. In addition, we match fund interest rates with like-kind debt (i.e., fixed-rate assets are financed with fixed-rate debt, and floating-rate assets are financed with floating-rate debt), through the use of hedges such as interest rate swaps, or through a combination of these strategies. This allows us to reduce the impact of changing interest rates on our earnings. Our objective is to limit volatility from a 100 basis point move in short-term interest rates to no more than 2.5% of annual adjusted earnings per share. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, a 100 basis point change in short-term interest rates would have a minimal impact on our fourthfirst quarter adjusted earnings per share.

        Significant Equity Base    We have approximately $2.4$2.5 billion of tangible book equity and a consolidated debt-to-bookdebt to book equity plus accumulated depreciation and loan loss reserves ratio of 1.7x as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. We believe that we are one of the most strongly capitalized asset-based finance companies. Our tax-advantaged structure as a REIT and our ability to operate with less overhead, as a percentage of revenues, than many other commercial finance companies enable us to generate higher returns on our invested capital without excessive reliance on leverage.

        Experienced Management    The 15 members of our executive management team have an average of more than 20 years of experience in the fields of real estate finance, private investment, capital markets, transaction structuring, risk management, legal and loan servicing, providing us with significant expertise in the key disciplines required for success in our business. Our culture is also highly-focused toward on-going asset risk management. We emphasize long-term, incentive-based compensation, such as performance based grants of restricted common stock, rather than cash compensation, and none of our employees is compensated based on the volume of investment originations. As of DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 our directors and employees directly owned approximately 4.7%5.4% of our outstanding common stock on a diluted basis, which had a market value of approximately $218$221 million based upon the last reported sales price of our common stock on March 19,June 2, 2004. Our 15-member executive management team is supported by approximately 140155 employees operating from six primary offices nationwide.

        Tax-Advantaged Corporate Structure    Because of our focus on commercial real estate finance, we are able to qualify as a REIT. Since we are taxed as a REIT, we do not pay corporate-level taxes in most circumstances. This tax-advantaged structure enables us to produce higher returns on our invested capital compared to taxable finance companies while utilizing significantly less leverage than most taxable finance companies. The graph below shows our returns on average common book equity since 1999.

26




Return on Average Common Book Equity(1)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
We define "return on average common book equity" as total adjusted earnings divided by the average book value of common equity outstanding during the year. Adjusted earnings in 2002 includes a $15.0 million non-cash charge related to performance-based vesting of restricted shares granted under our long-term incentive plan.

Asset Base

        The table below sets forth certain financial characteristics of our asset base as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.


Financial Characteristics of Our Asset Base


 Loans
 Leases
 Loans
 Leases

 (In millions)

 (In millions)

Gross Carrying Value $3,736 $2,790 $4,021 $3,141
Total Financing Commitments $3,945 Not applicable $4,350 Not applicable

Number of Investments

 

111

 

115

 

117

 

115
Number of Underlying Properties 2,370 179 2,353 365
Average Asset Size per Investment $33.7 $24.3 $34.4 $27.3
Average Asset Size per Property $30.1 $15.6 $30.0 $8.6

Weighted Average Maturity/Lease Term

 

3.7 years

 

9.9 years

 

3.5 years

 

11.0 years
Average First Dollar Loan-to-Value(1) 25.3% Not applicable 23.6% Not applicable
Average Last Dollar Loan-to-Value(2) 67.5% Not applicable 67.0% Not applicable

Percentage Investment Grade Credits(3)

 

Not available

 

56.5%

 

Not available

 

53.4%

(1)
"Average First Dollar Loan-to-Value" means the weighted average beginning point of our lending exposure in the aggregate capitalization of the underlying properties or companies we finance.

(2)
"Average Last Dollar Loan-to-Value" means the weighted average ending point of our lending exposure in the aggregate capitalization of the underlying properties or companies we finance.

(2)(3)
Includes customers with implied investment grade ratings such as Cisco Systems and Volkswagen of America.

Our Target Markets and Product Lines

        We believe we are the largest dedicated participant in a $100-$150 billion niche of the approximately $2.1 trillion commercial real estate market, consisting of the $1.5 trillion commercial

27



mortgage market and the $600 billion single-user market for corporate office and industrial facilities.



Our primary product lines include structured finance, portfolio finance, corporate tenant leasing, corporate finance and loan acquisition. Our real estate lending assets consist of mortgages secured by real estate collateral, loans secured by equity interests in real estate assets, and secured and unsecured loans to corporations engaged in real estate or real estate-related businesses. Our corporate tenant lease assets consist of office and industrial facilities that we typically purchase from, and lease-back to, a diversified group of creditworthy corporate tenants as a form of financing for their businesses. Our leases are generally long-term, and typically provide for all expenses at the facility to be paid by the corporate tenant on a "triple net" basis. Under a typical net lease agreement, the corporate customer agrees to pay a base monthly operating lease payment and all facility operating expenses, including taxes, maintenance and insurance.

        The pie chart below shows the composition of our asset base by product line, based on the total gross book value of our loan and CTL assets of approximately $6.5$7.2 billion as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.


Product Line Diversification

        GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        Structured Finance    We provide senior and subordinated loans that typically range in size from $20 million to $100 million to borrowers holding high-quality real estate. These loans may be either fixed or variable rate and are structured to meet the specific financing needs of the borrowers, including the acquisition or financing of large, high-quality real estate. We offer borrowers a wide range of structured finance options, including first mortgages, second mortgages, partnership loans, participating debt and interim facilities. Our structured finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, based on gross carrying values, our structured finance assets represented 26.0%26.4% of our total asset base.

        Portfolio Finance    We provide funding to regional and national borrowers who own multiple facilities in geographically diverse portfolios. Loans are cross-collateralized to give us the benefit of all available collateral and underwritten to recognize inherent portfolio diversification. Property types include multifamily, suburban office, hotels and other property types where individual property values are less than $20 million on average. Loan terms are structured to meet the specific requirements of the borrower and typically range in size from $25 million to $150 million. Our portfolio finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, based on gross carrying values, our portfolio finance assets represented 15.5%14.1% of our total asset base.

        Corporate Tenant Leasing    We provide capital to corporations and borrowers who control facilities leased to single creditworthy tenants. Our net leased assets are generally mission-critical headquarters or distribution facilities that are subject to long-term leases with rated corporate tenants, and which provide for all expenses at the property to be paid by the corporate tenant on a triple net lease basis. Corporate tenant lease transactions have terms generally ranging from ten to 20 years and typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, based on gross carrying values, our corporate tenant lease assets represented 41.9%43.9% of our total asset base.

28




        We pursue the origination of corporate tenant lease transactions by structuring purchase/leasebacks and by acquiring facilities subject to existing long-term net leases. In a purchase/leaseback transaction, we purchase the property from the corporate tenant and lease it back to the tenant on a triple-net basis. The purchase/leaseback structure allows the corporate customer to reinvest the proceeds from the sale of its facilities into its core business, while we capitalize on our structured financing expertise.

        Our corporate tenant lease investments primarily represent a diversified portfolio of mission-critical headquarters or distribution facilities subject to net lease agreements with creditworthy corporate tenants. By "mission-critical" we mean the tenant views our facility as being of strategic and operational importance to its business activities. In our experience, tenants tend to first vacate and reject leases on their non-core facilities when they experience financial distress, but continue to occupy and remain current on their lease payments for mission-critical facilities because these facilities are needed to continue to run the business. The corporate tenant lease investments we target generally involve: (1) high-quality, general-purpose real estate with residual values that represent a discount to current market values and replacement costs; and (2) corporate tenants that are established companies with stable core businesses or market leaders in growing industries with investment-grade credit strength or appropriate credit enhancements if corporate credit strength is not sufficient.

        Since acquiring our leasing subsidiary in November 1999, we have increased the weighted average remaining lease term of our corporate tenant lease assets from 5.6 to 9.911.0 years. During that time we have also executed over 21.430.0 million square feet of new and renewal leases in 189199 total transactions with a weighted average lease term of 11.912.7 years. Throughout this leasing activity, we have emphasized early lease renewals. Of the 5.16.5 million square feet of leases renewed since June 1999, approximately 62%69% represented early renewals where there were more than 12 months left on the primary lease term. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our corporate tenant lease portfolio was 93%94.1% leased.

        As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, we had more than 100 corporate customers operating in 39 different Standard Industrial Classification codes, including aerospace, energy, financial services, healthcare, hospitality, technology, government services, manufacturing and telecommunications. These customers include the U.S. Government and well-recognized national and international companies, such as Accenture, Ltd., Charles Schwab Corporation, FedEx Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation, Nike, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Verizon Communications, Inc., Volkswagen of America and Wells Fargo Bank.

        The pie chart below summarizes our corporate tenant lease customers by Standard Industrial Classification code as of DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 (by percentage of CTL revenue).

29




Corporate Tenant Lease Portfolio by SIC Code

        GRAPHICGRAPHIC

30



        The table below illustrates our corporate tenant lease expirations as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.

Lease Expirations

Year of Lease Expiration

 Number of
Leases Expiring

 Annualized
Fourth Quarter
2003 Expiring GAAP
Operating Lease Revenue
($ in thousands)

 % of
Annualized
Fourth Quarter
2003
Total Revenue

  Number of
Leases Expiring

 Annualized
First Quarter
2004 Expiring GAAP
Operating Lease Revenue
($ in thousands)

 % of
Annualized
First Quarter
2004
Total Revenue

 
2004 20 $19,599 3.0% 15 $11,524 1.7%
2005 16 10,723 1.6% 14 8,362 1.2%
2006 27 30,073 4.6% 25 28,994 4.3%
2007 23 18,448 2.8% 24 20,683 3.1%
2008 17 13,714 2.1% 17 13,525 2.0%
2009 12 13,478 2.1% 11 16,504 2.4%
2010 6 8,557 1.3% 6 8,557 1.3%
2011 7 6,131 0.9% 7 5,777 0.9%
2012 11 17,367 2.6% 13 18,618 2.7%
2013 and thereafter 50 155,617 23.7% 55 190,838 28.2%
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total 189 $293,706 44.7% 187 $323,381 47.7%
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

        Corporate Finance    We provide senior and subordinated capital to corporations engaged in real estate or real estate-related businesses. Financings may be either secured or unsecured and typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million. Our corporate finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from five to ten years. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, based on gross carrying values, our corporate finance assets represented 8.3%9.2% of our total asset base.

        Loan Acquisition    We acquire whole loans and loan participations that present attractive risk-reward opportunities. Loans are generally acquired at a small discount to the principal balance outstanding. Loan acquisitions typically range in size from $5 million to $100 million and are collateralized by all major property types. Our loan acquisition transactions have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, based on gross carrying values, our loan acquisition assets represented 6.3%6.4% of our total asset base.

31




OUR STRATEGY

        Our objective is to generate consistent and attractive returns on our invested capital by providing innovative and value-added financing solutions to our customers. We believe we have established a market leadership position for highly structured mortgage, corporate and mezzanine financing backed by high-quality commercial real estate nationwide. We deliver customized financial products to sophisticated real estate borrowers and corporate customers who require a high level of creativity and service. Our ability to provide value-added financial solutions has consistently enabled us to realize margins and returns on capital that are more attractive than those earned by many other commercial real estate lenders.

Investment Strategy

        In order to accomplish our objective, we have implemented the following investment strategy:

        We source our investment transactions from our existing relationships with real estate owners, through other direct relationships within the real estate and corporate finance communities, and from other capital providers and advisors who refer customers to us. We also utilize information obtained from our risk management group to generate leads on potential investment opportunities. We have completed over $5.2$5.8 billion of financing transactions with borrowers who have sought our expertise more than once.

        We discuss and analyze investment opportunities during regular weekly meetings which are attended by all of our investment professionals, as well as representatives from our legal, risk management and capital markets areas. We have developed a process for screening potential investments called the Six Point Methodologysm. The Six Point Methodologysm reflects the six fundamental criteria by which we evaluate an investment opportunity prior to beginning our formal underwriting and commitment process.


The Six Point Methodologysm

32



        We have an intensive underwriting process in place for all potential investments. This process provides for comprehensive feedback and review by all the disciplines within our company, including investments, credit, risk management, legal/structuring and capital markets. Participation is encouraged from all professionals throughout the entire origination process, from the initial consideration of the opportunity, through the Six Point Methodologysm and into the preparation and distribution of a comprehensive memorandum for our internal and Board of Directors investment committees.

        Commitments of less than $30 million require the unanimous consent of our internal investment committee, consisting of senior management representatives from each of our key disciplines. For commitments between $30 million and $50 million, the further approval of our Board of Directors' investment committee is also required. All commitments of $50 million or more must be approved by our full Board of Directors.

Risk Management

        In addition to mitigating risk through the careful underwriting and structuring of our investments, we further proactively manage risk by: (1) generating, analyzing and distributing information on-line to all our employees about our collateral and our customers on a continuous, real-time basis; (2) holding weekly company-wide meetings to identify and address risk management issues; (3) applying a comprehensive risk rating process; (4) establishing loan loss reserves and asset impairment procedures; and (5) managing our assets and liabilities through match funding. We believe these risk management measures enable us to effectively manage our asset base and minimize our risk of loss. More than 60 of our approximately 155 employees are dedicated to our risk management platform.

        Collateral and Customer Monitoring    We have comprehensive real-time risk management systems that enable us to proactively monitor the performance of our asset base and to quickly identify and address potential issues with any of our assets. Risk management information, which is generated from numerous collateral-level controls, extensive customer reporting requirements and on-site asset monitoring programs, is accessible to all our employees nationwide via computer.

        Our comprehensive risk management systems require the active participation of each of our senior professionals and other employees within our regional office infrastructure. Every employee nationwide has access, via our computer network, to various risk management reports which provide real-time information regarding the performance of our asset base. These reports, which are continually updated as new customer information is received, are based on information that is: (1) required to be provided by our customers; (2) generated by our risk management professionals; and (3) obtained from the public domain. Examples of risk management reports include daily payment reports, monthly covenant reviews, monthly reserve balance reports, monthly budget-versus-actual analyses of collateral and corporate customer performance, leasing activity reports and quarterly risk ratings reviews. This process

33




ensures that risk management issues are quickly identified and that decisions are based on the most current information available.

        iStar Asset Services, or "iSAS," our rated loan servicing subsidiary, and iStar Real Estate Services, or "iRES," our corporate tenant lease asset management division, are critical to our asset and customer monitoring efforts. Together, they are principally responsible for managing our asset base, including monitoring our customers' compliance with their respective loan and leasing agreements, collecting customer payments, and efficiently analyzing and distributing customer performance information throughout our company on a real-time basis. iSAS and iRES provide daily information on the performance and condition of our asset base. iSAS is currently rated "strong" by Standard & Poor's and CMS2- by Fitch as a master servicer. In addition to servicing our asset base, iSAS also provides loan servicing to third-party institutional owners of loan portfolios.

        Our loan customers are required to comply with periodic covenant tests, and typically must submit extensive collateral performance information such as monthly operating statements and operating budgets. We also may require customers to deposit cash into escrow accounts to cover major capital expenditures, such as expected re-tenanting costs, and we typically require approval rights over major decisions impacting collateral cash flows. In many cases, collateral cash receipts must be deposited into lock-box bank accounts that we control. We then distribute the net cash, after our debt service, to our customers.

        We furnish on-site asset management services for most of our corporate customers, providing us with daily information regarding the condition of our assets. In addition, we have a formal annual inspection program that ensures that our corporate tenant lease customers are complying with their lease terms. Customer lease payments are deposited directly into lock-box accounts managed by our treasury group, and corporate customers are required to submit financial statements on a regular basis to our corporate credit professionals. In addition, our risk management group monitors the wire services for important news on our customers, including press releases, earnings announcements, credit ratings changes, research reports relating to our corporate customers and local market conditions, and distributes this information via email to all of our employees. All new corporate tenant leases must be approved by our Chief Operating Officer who evaluates, with the assistance of our credit professionals, the creditworthiness and appropriate security, if any, required by us.

        Weekly Risk Management Meetings    We hold weekly company-wide meetings to identify current issues, and conduct monthly meetings to review actual collateral performance compared to our customers' budgets. During the weekly meetings, our regional offices connect via videoconferenceteleconference with our headquarters and we review asset-specific issues in detail. At these meetings, we develop an action plan to resolve any issues which arise. We also conduct systematic, asset-specific reviews of both our loan and corporate tenant lease assets on a quarterly basis, as discussed below.

        Risk Rating Process    We have a comprehensive risk rating process that enables us to evaluate, monitor and pro-actively manage asset-specific credit issues and identify credit trends on a portfolio-wide basis. We conduct a detailed credit review of each asset on a quarterly basis, and we assign risk ratings to each asset ranging from "one" to "five." Attendance is mandatory for all of our professionals, including those in our regional offices. We assign two separate quarterly risk ratings to our structured finance assets using a "one" to "five" scale. We assign a rating representing our evaluation of the risk of principal loss, and a rating representing performance compared to original underwriting. Corporate tenant lease risk ratings reflect our assessment of the quality and longevity of the cash flow yield from the asset. Assets with risk ratings of "four" and "five" indicate management time and attention is required, and a risk rating of "five" denotes a potential problem asset. Each newly-originated asset is typically assigned an initial rating of "three," or average. In addition to the rating system, we maintain a "watch list" of assets that require highly proactive asset management.

34




        Risk ratings provide a common language and uniform framework by which we can discuss and evaluate risk and relative levels of risk across our asset base. This is our primary early warning system and provides us with a means of identifying assets that warrant a greater degree of monitoring and senior management attention. In addition, this process provides a useful forum to identify assets or markets that may offer opportunities for new business. Lastly, the risk ratings process serves as a basis for determining our quarterly loan loss provision and evaluating the adequacy of our reserves.

        Based upon our fourthfirst quarter 20032004 review, the weighted average risk rating of our structured finance assets was 2.672.62 for risk of principal loss and 3.153.16 for performance compared to original underwriting. The weighted average risk rating for our corporate tenant lease assets was 2.622.52 as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.


Weighted Average Risk Ratings

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        We consider several primary variables in determining which rating to assign to an asset. For our loans, the seven primary risk attributes are:

        For our corporate tenant leases, the five primary risk attributes are:

35



        Credit Loss Reserve Policy and Asset Impairment Procedures    Our policy for establishing loan loss reserves and our asset impairment procedures are consistent with established accounting standards. Our reserve levels reflect our judgment of loss potential and are evaluated based upon the quarterly risk rating review process. The overall factors in this evaluation include:

        In addition to our general loan loss reserves, we also have asset-specific credit protection, including cash reserve accounts, cash deposits and letters of credit which totaled $218.1$228.1 million for our loan assets as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. Where appropriate, we typically require this incremental credit protection to be funded and/or posted at the closing of a transaction in accounts in which we have a security interest. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, accumulated loan loss reserves and other asset-specific credit protection represented an aggregate of approximately 6.73%6.58% of the gross book value of our loans.

        During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we wrote off a $3.3 million premium that we recorded on a $30.4 million loan when we acquired it in 1998 (as partAt March 31, 2004, our non-accrual assets represented 0.55% of our acquisition of a portfolio of loans). We wrote off the premium against our loan loss reserves. In addition, as of December 31, 2003, we had only three assets on non-accrual status with an aggregate carrying value of $40.3 million (0.62% of the gross book value of our investments).total assets.

        As required under generally accepted accounting principles, we accumulate depreciation against our CTL assets, which reduces our book basis in those assets relative to our original purchase price. In addition, where appropriate, we also require certain CTL customers to post additional security for their lease obligations in the form of cash deposits and/or letters of credit. These cash deposits and letters of credit, which serve as additional asset-specific credit protection for our CTL assets, totaled $95.4$95.2 million as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. In aggregate, cash deposits, letters of credit, allowances for doubtful accounts and accumulated depreciation relating to corporate tenant lease assets represented 9.87%9.39% of the gross book value of our corporate tenant lease assets at that date.

        Asset/Liability Management    Our objective is to match fund our liabilities and assets with respect to maturities and interest rates. This means that we seek to match the maturities of our financial obligations with the maturities of our investments. Match funding allows us to reduce the risk of having to refinance our liabilities prior to the maturity of our assets. In addition, we match fund interest rates with like-kind debt (i.e., fixed-rate assets are financed with fixed-rate debt, and floating-rate assets are financed with floating-rate debt), through the use of hedges such as interest rate swaps, or through a combination of these strategies. This allows us to reduce the impact of changing interest rates on our earnings. Our objective is to limit volatility from a 100 basis point move in short-term interest rates to no more than 2.5% of annual adjusted earnings per share. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, a 100 basis point change in short-term interest rates would have a minimal impact on our fourthfirst quarter adjusted earnings per share.

Financing Strategy

        Our financing strategy revolves around three primary principles that are key to our business model:

36




        Lower Leverage and a Large Tangible Equity Capital Base    Our business model is premised on operating at significantly lower leverage and maintaining a larger tangible equity capital base than many other commercial finance companies. At DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our consolidated debt-to-bookdebt to book equity plus accumulated depreciation and loan loss reserves ratio was 1.7x.

        Access to a Deep and Broad Array of Reliable Capital Sources    We seek to develop a deep and broad array of reliable debt and equity capital sources to fund our business. Accordingly, we maintain a diverse range of short and long-term financing sources from both the secured and unsecured lending and capital markets. We also believe that our track record as a private and public company and our investor base, comprised of leading institutional investors and high net worth individuals, will enable us to continue to access the public and private equity capital markets. At DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, we had $826.6$530.9 million outstanding under our five primary revolving credit facilities, which total $2.7$2.3 billion in committed capacity.

        Match Funding    We primarily execute our match funding strategy through issuing corporate unsecured senior notes having three-, five-, seven-, and 10-year maturities, our own proprietary matched funding program, iStar Asset Receivables or "STARssm," as well as through term lending relationships with over a dozen large financial institutions. Using STARssm, we can access the securitized debt markets by issuing investment-grade rated securities collateralized by pools of our structured finance and corporate tenant lease assets. The STARssmbond maturities match the maturities of the underlying collateral, thereby eliminating refinancing risk. We continue to service the assets in the collateral pool through our loan servicing subsidiary, iStar Asset Services. Because STARssm is an on-balance sheet financing program, we recognize no gain on sale in our financial statements when utilizing this vehicle.

        We completed our latest STARssm transaction in May 2003, and issued approximately $646 million of investment-grade rated bonds backed by approximately $738 million of collateral. The weighted average interest rate on the offered bonds, expressed on an all-floating rate basis, was approximately LIBOR + 47 basis points. The proceeds from this transaction were used to repay outstanding borrowings under our secured credit facilities.

        We believe that the STARssm program provides us significantly more flexibility in managing our collateral and match funding our liabilities and assets than other securitization structures, and that both the strong performance of our initial two STARssm transactions and the execution of our third STARssm transaction should positively impact future debt issuances under this program. In addition, we view the securitized debt markets as a very reliable source of debt capital, even when macroeconomic conditions make other lending markets unavailable or unattractive. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, we had $1.3$1.2 billion of STARssm bonds outstanding.

        We also use term debt to match fund our investments, and we maintain term lending relationships with over a dozen major commercial banks and insurance companies. As part of these term lending relationships, we have developed an innovative debt facility with a commercial bank that match funds certain of our corporate finance investments. We believe that the STARssm program and our relationships with various term lenders provide us with a reliable, cost-effective and diverse source of capital for match funding our liabilities and assets. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, we had 19 individual term loans with a total outstanding balance of $842.3$805.9 million.

37




MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth the names and the positions of our senior officers:

Name

 Title
Jay Sugarman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Catherine D. Rice Chief Financial Officer
Timothy J. O'Connor Chief Operating Officer
Nina B. Matis Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Barbara Rubin President—iStar Asset Services, Inc.
Daniel S. Abrams Executive Vice President—Investments
Steven R. Blomquist Executive Vice President—Investments
Roger M. Cozzi Executive Vice President—Investments
Jeffrey R. Digel Executive Vice President—Investments
R. Michael Dorsch, III Executive Vice President—Investments
Barclay G. Jones, III Executive Vice President—Investments
H. Cabot Lodge, III Executive Vice President—Investments
Michelle M. Mackay Executive Vice President—Investments
Diane Olmstead Executive Vice President—Investments
Andrew C. Richardson Executive Vice President—Capital Markets
Jeffrey N. Brown Senior Vice President—Risk Management
James D. Burns Senior Vice President and Treasurer
Chase S. Curtis, Jr. Senior Vice President—Credit
Geoffrey M. Dugan Senior Vice President—Human Resources, Assistant General Counsel and Secretary
John F. Kubicko Senior Vice President—Risk Management
Elizabeth B. Smith Senior Vice President—Risk Management
Colette J. Tretola Senior Vice President—Controller

Senior Management

��       Jay Sugarman is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of iStar Financial. Mr. Sugarman has served as a director of iStar Financial (and its predecessor) since 1996 and Chief Executive Officer since 1997. During that time, Mr. Sugarman has built iStar Financial into one of the leading providers of custom-tailored financial solutions to high-end private and corporate owners of real estate in the United States, growing its market capitalization from under $50 million to over $9 billion. Previously, Mr. Sugarman founded and was co-general partner of Starwood Mezzanine Investors, L.P., a private investment partnership specializing in structured real estate finance. Prior to forming Starwood Mezzanine, Mr. Sugarman managed diversified investment funds on behalf of the Burden family, a branch of the Vanderbilts, and the Ziff family. While in that position, he was jointly responsible for the formation of Starwood Capital Group LLC, a leading private real estate investment firm, and the formation of HBK Investments, one of the nation's largest multi-strategy trading operations. Mr. Sugarman received his undergraduate degree summa cum laude from Princeton University, where he was nominated for valedictorian and received the Paul Volcker Award in Economics, and his M.B.A. with highest distinction from Harvard Business School, graduating as a Baker Scholar and recipient of the school's academic prizes for both finance and marketing. Mr. Sugarman is a director of WCI Communities, Inc., a residential developer in South Florida.

38




        Catherine D. Rice has served as Chief Financial Officer of iStar Financial since November 2002. Ms. Rice is responsible for managing all of iStar Financial's capital-raising initiatives, financial reporting and investor relations activities, as well as overseeing all other finance, treasury and accounting functions. Prior to joining iStar Financial, Ms. Rice served as managing director in both the financial sponsors group and the real estate investment banking group of Banc of America Securities. Prior to Banc of America Securities, Ms. Rice was a managing director at Lehman Brothers, where she was responsible for the firm's West Coast real estate investment banking effort. She spent the first ten years of her career at Merrill Lynch in its real estate investment banking group. Ms. Rice has over 17 years of experience in the public and private capital markets, and has been involved in over $15 billion of capital-raising and financial advisory transactions, including public and private debt and equity offerings, mortgage financings, merger and acquisition assignments, leveraged buyouts, asset dispositions, debt restructurings and rating advisory assignments. Ms. Rice received a bachelor degree from the University of Colorado and an M.B.A from Columbia University.

        Timothy J. O'Connor has served as Chief Operating Officer of iStar Financial (and its predecessor) since March 1998 and Executive Vice President since March 2000. Mr. O'Connor is responsible for developing and managing iStar Financial's risk management and due diligence operations, participating in the evaluation and approval of new investments and coordinating iStar Financial's information systems. Previously, Mr. O'Connor was a vice president of Morgan Stanley & Co. responsible for the performance of more than $2 billion of assets acquired by the Morgan Stanley Real Estate Funds. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. O'Connor was a vice president of Greystone Realty Corporation involved in the firm's acquisition and asset management operations. Previously, Mr. O'Connor was employed by Exxon Co. USA in its real estate and engineering group. Mr. O'Connor is a former vice president of the New York City/Fairfield County chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. Mr. O'Connor received a B.S. degree from the United States Military Academy at West Point and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School.

        Nina B. Matis has served as General Counsel of iStar Financial (and its predecessor) since 1996 and Executive Vice President since November 1999. Ms. Matis is responsible for legal, tax, structuring and regulatory aspects of iStar Financial's operations and investment and financing transactions. Ms. Matis is a partner in the law firm of KMZ Rosenman, one of our principal outside law firms. From 1984 through 1987, Ms. Matis was an adjunct professor at Northwestern University School of Law where she taught real estate transactions. Ms. Matis is a director of New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. and a member of the American College of Real Estate Lawyers, Ely Chapter of Lambda Alpha International, the Chicago Finance Exchange, the Urban Land Institute, REFF, the Chicago Real Estate Executive Women, The Chicago Network and The Economic Club of Chicago, and she is listed in both The Best Lawyers of America and Sterling's Who's Who. Ms. Matis received a B.A. degree, with honors, from Smith College and a J.D. degree from New York University School of Law.

        Barbara Rubin has served as President of iStar Asset Services, Inc., our Hartford-based loan asset management and servicing operation since September 1998. She has more than 20 years of real estate investment experience, including loan and real estate equity origination, portfolio management, loan servicing, and capital markets activities. Prior to joining iStar Financial, Ms. Rubin was president and chief operating officer of Phoenix Realty Securities, Inc., a real estate advisory operation which managed portfolios of real estate securities (including mortgage loan investments and real estate equity securities). She is currently Chair of the Connecticut Health and Education Facilities Authority, a member of the Board of Governors of the Mortgage Bankers Association and a member of the Board of Commercial Mortgage Securities Association. Ms. Rubin received a B.A. degree from Williams College and an M.B.A. from the University of Connecticut.

        Daniel S. Abrams has served as an Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial since November 2001. Previously, Mr. Abrams was a founding principal of Citadel Realty Group, LLC, a New York based boutique investment bank specializing in advisory work and debt and equity

39




placements for all forms of commercial real estate properties and companies in North America and Europe. Prior to forming Citadel, Mr. Abrams was a managing director at Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette, where he was responsible for the hospitality and leisure practice, focusing on debt originations, equity offerings and advisory assignments to public and private companies in that area. Before DLJ, Mr. Abrams was a managing director and the head of the Hospitality Finance Group of Nomura Capital. While at Nomura Capital, Mr. Abrams led the financing of over $6.5 billion in the hospitality sector and over $600 million in the office, multifamily and retail sectors. Before joining Nomura Capital in 1993, Mr. Abrams had been a partner at Rosenman & Colin, a major New York City law firm. He received an LL.M. in Taxation from the New York University of Law; a JD from the National Law Center of the George Washington University, where he was editor-in-chief of the Law Review; and a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School. He has served as a member of the American Hotel & Lodging Association's Industry Real Estate Finance Advisory Council (IREFAC) and the ULI's Hotel Development Council.

        Steven R. Blomquist has served as Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial since January 2003. Prior to that he was Senior Vice President—Investments since September 1998. Mr. Blomquist is responsible for the origination and acquisition of new financings with borrowers in the Phoenix Home Life-serviced mortgage loan portfolio and related loan correspondents. He also shares responsibility in managing several of iStar Financial's relationships with financial institutions and other loan correspondents. Mr. Blomquist has over 16 years of loan origination and investment management experience. Previously, Mr. Blomquist was executive vice president and chief investment officer of Phoenix Realty Securities, a Phoenix Home Life subsidiary specializing in providing real estate securities investment advisory services. Mr. Blomquist directed the origination of over $1.5 billion of mortgage loans and maintains strong correspondent and borrower relations. Prior to his current position, Mr. Blomquist was responsible for the debt and equity management of a $750 million Phoenix Home Life portfolio in the Western United States. Mr. Blomquist is a member of the Mortgage Bankers Association, and received both his bachelors degree and an M.B.A. from the University of Connecticut.

        Roger M. Cozzi has served as an Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial since January 2002 and is co-head of our internal Investment Committee. Since joining iStar Financial and its predecessor in 1995, Mr. Cozzi has been responsible for the origination of structured financing transactions and has successfully closed over $1 billion of first mortgage, mezzanine and corporate finance investments. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Cozzi was an investment officer at Starwood Mezzanine Investors, L.P. and Starwood Opportunity Fund IV, two private investment funds that specialized in structured real estate finance and opportunistic equity investments. Prior to joining Starwood, Mr. Cozzi spent three years at Goldman, Sachs & Co. While at Goldman Sachs, he spent two years in the real estate department, where he focused on securitizing and selling investment grade and non-investment grade securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages, evaluating performing commercial mortgage loans for potential principal investment by the Whitehall funds and consulting large corporate tenants on lease alternatives. After two years in real estate, Mr. Cozzi transferred into the investment management industry group, where he worked on several merger transactions, created a conduit to lend directly to mutual funds, and helped create a vehicle to securitize 12b-1 financing fees. Mr. Cozzi graduated magna cum laude from the Wharton School with a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics (with concentrations in Finance and Entrepreneurial Management).

        Jeffrey R. Digel has served as an Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial since March 2000 and is co-head of our internal Investment Committee. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President—Investments since May 1998. Mr. Digel is responsible for the origination of new structured financing transactions, focusing on iStar Financial's financial institution and loan correspondent relationships. Previously, Mr. Digel was a vice president-mortgage finance at Aetna Life Insurance Company responsible for commercial mortgage securitizations, management of Aetna's mortgage

40




correspondent network, management of a $750 million real estate equity portfolio for Aetna's pension clients and origination of new equity investments. Prior to joining Aetna, Mr. Digel was a member of Hart Advisors, responsible for the development and supervision of the portfolio, asset management and client communications functions for Hart's real estate pension advisory business. In addition, Mr. Digel is a member of the Mortgage Bankers Association and the International Council of Shopping Centers. Mr. Digel received a B.A. degree from Middlebury College and an M.M. from Northwestern University.

        R. Michael Dorsch, III has served as an Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial since March 2000, focusing on our corporate tenant leasing business. Prior to joining iStar Financial, Mr. Dorsch was a principal of ACRE Partners LLC, a privately held firm focused on providing public and private corporations with highly-structured, value-added financing solutions for their corporate real estate facilities. Mr. Dorsch was a founder and managing partner of Corporate Realty Capital, a Boston-based real estate investment bank from 1990 to 1997. CRC was formed as an affiliate of Corporate Property Investors and focused on originating, structuring and financing net lease transactions. Prior to the formation of CRC, Mr. Dorsch was a partner in a Boston-based real estate development, ownership and management concern. From 1984 to 1986, Mr. Dorsch was a vice president of Winthrop Financial Associates, private real estate syndication, where he structured and placed equity interests in transactions capitalized at over $1 billion. Mr. Dorsch graduated with a Sc.B. in Mechanical Engineering from Brown University and earned honors while receiving an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

        Barclay G. Jones, III has served as an Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial since March 2000, focusing on our corporate tenant leasing business. Prior to joining iStar Financial, Mr. Jones was a principal of ACRE Partners LLC, a privately held firm focused on providing public and private corporations with highly-structured, value-added financing solutions for their corporate real estate facilities. Prior to that, Mr. Jones served in a variety of capacities, including vice chairman and chief acquisitions officer, for W.P. Carey & Co., Inc. from 1982 to 1998. During that period, Mr. Jones was responsible for originating in excess of $2 billion of sale-leaseback financings and over $1 billion of mortgage placements. During his tenure at W.P. Carey, the firm grew from fewer than ten employees to over 70, and from approximately $100 million in assets to over $2.5 billion. Mr. Jones holds a B.S. degree in economics from the Wharton School.

        H. Cabot Lodge, III has served as an Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial since March 2000 and he also served as a Director from May 2000 through June 2003. Mr. Lodge has primary responsibility for jointly overseeing iStar Financial's corporate tenant lease investment activity. Prior to joining iStar Financial, Mr. Lodge was a founder and principal of ACRE Partners LLC, a privately held firm focused on providing public and private corporations with highly structured, value-added financing for their corporate real estate facilities. Mr. Lodge served as chairman of Superconducting Core Technologies, Inc., a wireless communications company from 1995 to 1997, and prior to that was managing director and co-head of investments for W.P. Carey & Co., Inc. from 1983 to 1995. Mr. Lodge is a director of Meristar Hospitality Corporation, High Voltage Engineering Corporation and TelAmerica Media, Inc. Mr. Lodge graduated with honors from Harvard College and received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

        Michelle M. Mackay has served as Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial since February 2003. She joined iStar Financial from UBS Warburg, where she was an Executive Director in commercial real estate and a senior member of the commercial real estate approval committee. She originated and closed over $1 billion of first mortgage and mezzanine real estate transactions while at UBS. Ms. Mackay was also responsible for mezzanine structuring and distribution. From 1996 to 1998, Ms. Mackay was Vice President at Chase Bank where she was part of a two-person team hired to establish the commercial mortgage-backed securities trading desk and real estate products distribution. In addition, she managed the new issue processes including rating agency interaction, mortgage finance

41




assignments, new issue syndication and pricing. Prior to Chase, Ms. Mackay created and managed a $1.8 billion portfolio of real estate investments at The Hartford (HIMCO). Her responsibilities included analyzing and investing in CMBS, CMBS IO, unsecured REIT debt, FNMA multifamily, credit tenant lease structures and non-investment grade real estate companies. She was also a member of The Hartford's real estate equity acquisition group, which invested in a variety of real estate properties. Ms. Mackay holds an M.B.A. from the University of Hartford and a B.A. from the University of Connecticut.

        Diane Olmstead has served as an Executive Vice President—Investments of iStar Financial in our San Francisco office since September 2000, and is responsible for the origination of new financing transactions. Prior to joining us, Ms. Olmstead was executive vice president of institutional ventures for Redbricks.com, an Internet start-up focused on the commercial real estate market. Previously, Ms. Olmstead was a partner at Arthur Andersen where she founded and ran the real estate capital markets (RECM) group for the western region. The RECM group executed private equity and debt placements, portfolio and company sales, REIT IPO advisory and M&A transactions in excess of $4.7 billion. Ms. Olmstead is a graduate of SUNY at Buffalo with a B.A. in English. She is a member of Urban Land Institute and National Association of Industrial and Office Park Owners, Fisher Center For Real Estate and Urban Economics Policy Advisory Board, Lambda Alpha and Mortgage Bankers Association.

        Andrew C. Richardson has served as Executive Vice President—Capital Markets of iStar Financial since January 2003. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President—Capital Markets since March 2000. He joined iStar Financial from Salomon Smith Barney, where he was a vice president in the global real estate and lodging investment banking group, providing merger and acquisition advisory services and raising debt and equity capital for public and private real estate companies. Mr. Richardson's experience at Salomon Smith Barney also included working in its mergers and acquisitions group, advising clients in a wide range of industries. Prior to joining Salomon Smith Barney, Mr. Richardson worked for Ernst & Young and was a certified public accountant. Mr. Richardson holds an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago, and a B.B.A. in accountancy from the University of Notre Dame.

        Jeffrey N. Brown has served as Senior Vice President—Risk Management of iStar Financial since October 2000. Prior to that, he was Vice President—Risk Management since November 1999. Previously, he served as a vice president at TriNet. Mr. Brown is responsible for our East Region corporate tenant lease assets, including lease negotiations, corporate-level customer relations, lease compliance, portfolio-level analysis and reporting and market research activities. Mr. Brown's prior professional experience includes director of property management for Insignia Commercial Group (San Francisco), regional director (West Coast) with PM Realty Group and various project/property management positions with Eastover Corporation. Mr. Brown holds a B.S. degree from Millsaps College, Jackson, Mississippi.

        James D. Burns    joined iStar Financial's New York office as Senior Vice President and Treasurer in July 2003. Prior to joining iStar Financial, he was Vice President and Global Treasurer at Cantor Fitzgerald where he was responsible for all treasury functions and the management of the department's New York and London locations. Mr. Burns has also served as Treasurer of the Asia-Pacific and Americas regions for Morgan Stanley and Global Head of Cash Management for PepsiCo. Inc. Mr. Burns has 20 years of experience in treasury and finance. He received his M.B.A in Finance from Columbia University's Graduate School of Business and his A.B. in Economics from Harvard College.

        Chase S. Curtis, Jr.    has served as a Senior Vice President—Credit of iStar Financial since June 2001, and is responsible for coordinating the initial and on-going underwriting of corporate credit, with a particular emphasis on corporate tenant risk assessment. He joined iStar Financial from Bank of America following a 16-year career in credit risk management and structured corporate finance. Immediately prior to joining iStar Financial, he was senior vice president and chief credit officer of

42




Bank of America Commercial Finance responsible for its credit approvals, risk policy and risk process controls. Prior to that, he spent three years in Hong Kong as an executive credit risk review officer overseeing portfolio and transactional risk assessments across Asia. Mr. Curtis holds an M.S. from the University of Arizona and he received a B.S. degree (with high honors) from Bates College. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst.

        Geoffrey M. Dugan has served as Secretary since June 2003, Senior Vice President of iStar Financial since January 2000 and Assistant General Counsel since November 1999. Previously, he served as vice president, administration and general counsel of TriNet, and in that capacity was responsible for corporate and securities laws compliance matters, corporate governance matters, and legal issues associated with administrative, human resources and employee benefit functions, including the oversight of outside legal counsel. Prior to joining iStar Financial, Mr. Dugan was in private law practice for over 20 years, where his practice emphasized corporate finance, securities and commercial transactions for real estate investment trusts and other business entities. Mr. Dugan received a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and a B.A. from Harvard College. Mr. Dugan is a Member of the New York Bar and the State Bar of California.

        John F. Kubicko has served as Senior Vice President—Risk Management of iStar Financial since January 2002, and prior to that served as Vice President—Risk Management since April 1998. Mr. Kubicko has over 14 years of experience in real estate investment and finance, asset management and lending. Prior to joining iStar Financial, he was a senior associate at Greystone Realty, where he was responsible for managing a portfolio of debt investments. Previously, Mr. Kubicko was a loan officer at Shawmut Bank. Mr. Kubicko received a B.S. from Sacred Heart University.

        Elizabeth B. Smith has served as Senior Vice President—Risk Management of iStar Financial since August 1999. Ms. Smith manages our Dallas office and is directly responsible for our Central Region corporate tenant lease assets. Prior to joining iStar Financial, Ms. Smith was a vice president for MBL Life Assurance Corporation, managing the rehabilitation and disposition of a $3 billion debt and equity portfolio located throughout the United States. Previously, Ms. Smith worked at J.E. Robert Companies, Inc., and for Sunbelt Savings, FSB, specializing in debt and equity portfolio management. Ms. Smith holds a B.B.A. degree from the University of Mississippi in Oxford, Mississippi.

        Colette J. Tretola has served as Senior Vice President and Controller of iStar Financial since January 2003. Prior to that, she was Vice President and Controller since January 1999. Mrs. Tretola is responsible for the oversight of all accounting functions, financial reporting and budgeting. Prior to joining iStar Financial, she was a senior accountant at Starwood Capital Group, where she was responsible for the accounting and financial reporting for the firm's two largest investment funds. Previously, Mrs. Tretola worked for Copley Real Estate Advisors, where she was responsible for the accounting of four public real estate limited partnerships. She received a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Boston University.

43




Non-Employee Directors

        The following table sets forth the names and current affiliations of our non-employee directors:

Name

 Affiliation
Willis Andersen, Jr. Real estate industry consultant
Robert W. Holman, Jr. National Warehouse Investment Co.—Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Robin Josephs Ropasada, LLC—Managing Director
Matthew J. LustigLazard Frères Real Estate Investors L.L.C.—Managing Principal
John G. McDonald Stanford University—IBJ Professor of Finance in the Graduate School of Business
George R. Puskar Lend Lease Real Estate Investments—Former Chairman of the Board
Jeffrey A. Weber William A.M. Burden & Co., L.P.—President and Chief Executive Officer

44




DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS

        The table below reflects our debt obligations under various arrangements with financial institutions as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. All of the indebtedness shown below which has not subsequently been repaid is non-recourse to iStar Financial, the parent company; except that, iStar Financial is the co-borrower under the unsecured revolving credit facility shown below; iStar Financial is the issuer of the 8.75%, 7.0%, 6.50%, 6.0%, 5.70%, 5.125%, 4.875% and 6.0%senior floating rate unsecured notes shown below and the $48 million term loan due July 2008; iStar Financial is the obligor under $10 million of the "Other Debt Obligations" shown below; and iStar Financial has provided limited guarantees of certain subsidiary borrowings. Specifically, iStar Financial is a guarantor of the $60a $48 million subsidiary term loan due June 2004,July 2008, a guarantor of a $181.3 million subsidiary financing due 2006 and a guarantor of borrowings under secured revolving credit facilities as follows: (1) up to $30 million under the $700 million secured facility due January 2007; and (2) up to 10% of outstanding borrowings under each of the $500 million secured facilities due August and September, 2005; and (3) up to a 15% of outstanding borrowings under the $250 million secured credit facility due March 2005. In addition, iStar Financial provides guarantees under non-recourse subsidiary borrowings for customary carve-out matters such as fraud, misappropriation and voluntary bankruptcy proceedings. In JanuaryMay 2004 we issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2009 and in March 2004 we issued $250 million aggregate principal amount of 5.70% Senior Notes due 2014 and $175.0an additional $25 million of Senior Floating Rate Notessenior floating rate notes due 2007, all of which are unsecured and issued by iStar Financial.2007. See "Prospectus"Offering Memorandum Summary—Recent Developments." In JanuaryOn April 19, 2004, we repaid the $60completed a new $850.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The new facility has a three-year initial term loanwith a one-year extension at our option. The facility bears interest, based upon our current credit ratings, at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.00% and has a 0.25% annual facility fee. This new credit facility replaced our $300.0 million unsecured credit facility that was due June 2004 and iStar Financial provided a guarantee for a $177.5 million subsidiary financing due 2006. In February 2004, we called for redemption of $110 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.75% Senior Notes due 2008. On March 12, 2004,to mature in conjunction with the reduction of one of our $700 million credit facilities to $250 million, we guaranteed up to 15% of total outstanding borrowings.July 2004.

        We are subject to a number of covenants in our borrowing arrangements. These covenants are both financial and non-financial in nature. Significant financial covenants include limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness beyond specified levels, restrictions on our ability to incur liens on assets and limitations on the amount and type of restricted payments, such as repurchases of our own equity securities, that we may make. Significant non-financial covenants include a requirement in our publicly-held debt securities that we offer to repurchase those securities at a premium if we undergo a change of control.


  
 Carrying Value as of
  
  


 Maximum
Amount
Available

 December 31,
2003

 December 31,
2002

 Stated Interest
Rates(1)

 Scheduled
Maturity Date


  
 Carrying Value as of
  
  


 (In thousands)

  
  

 Maximum
Amount
Available

 March 31,
2004

 December 31,
2003

 Stated
Interest Rates(1)

 Scheduled
Maturity Date

Secured revolving credit facilities:Secured revolving credit facilities:             Secured revolving credit facilities:             
Line of credit $700,000 $88,640 $412,550 LIBOR + 1.75% - 2.25% March 2005(2)Line of credit(2) $250,000 $ $88,640 LIBOR + 1.50% — 2.05% March 2005
Line of credit  700,000  310,364  462,920 LIBOR + 1.40% - 2.15% January 2007(2)Line of credit  700,000  148,531  310,364 LIBOR + 1.40% — 2.15% January 2007(3)
Line of credit  500,000  117,211  283,884 LIBOR + 1.50% - 1.75% August 2005(2)(3)Line of credit  500,000  206,598  117,211 LIBOR + 1.75% — 2.25% August 2005(3)
Line of credit  500,000  180,376  114,400 LIBOR + 1.50% - 2.25% September 2005Line of credit  500,000  175,728  180,376 LIBOR + 1.50% — 2.25% September 2005

Unsecured revolving credit facilities:

Unsecured revolving credit facilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Unsecured revolving credit facilities:             
Line of credit  300,000  130,000   LIBOR + 2.125% July 2004(4)Line of credit  300,000    130,000 LIBOR + 2.125% July 2004
 
 
 
      
 
 
    
Total revolving credit facilities $2,700,000 $826,591 $1,273,754    Total revolving credit facilities $2,250,000 $530,857 $826,591    
 
 
 
      
          
Secured term loans:Secured term loans:             Secured term loans:             
Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     193,000  193,000 LIBOR + 1.85% July 2006(5)Secured by corporate tenant lease assets       193,000 LIBOR + 1.85% July 2006(4)
Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     140,440  144,114 7.44% March 2009Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     139,471  140,440 7.44% March 2009
Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     135,000   LIBOR + 1.75% October 2008(6)Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     135,000  135,000 LIBOR + 1.75% October 2008
Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     92,876  95,074 6.00% - 11.38% Various through 2022Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     41,440   7.19% and 7.22% January 2018 and December 2026
Secured by corporate lending investments     77,938  79,126 6.55% November 2005              
Secured by corporate lending investments     60,874  61,537 6.41% January 2013
Secured by corporate lending investments     60,000  60,000 LIBOR + 2.50% June 2004(7)
Secured by corporate lending investments       50,000 LIBOR + 0.60% October 2003(8)
Secured by corporate lending investments     48,000   LIBOR + 2.125% July 2008(9)
    
 
    
Total term loans     808,128  682,851    
Less: debt discount     (128) (236)   
    
 
    
Total secured term loans     808,000  682,615    
             

45



iStar Asset Receivables secured notes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 STARs Series 2002-1:             
  Class A1     40,011  236,694 LIBOR + 0.26% June 2004(10)
  Class A2     381,296  381,296 LIBOR + 0.38% December 2009(10)
  Class B     39,955  39,955 LIBOR + 0.65% April 2011(10)
  Class C     26,637  26,637 LIBOR + 0.75% May 2011(10)
  Class D     21,310  21,310 LIBOR + 0.85% January 2012(10)
  Class E     42,619  42,619 LIBOR + 1.235% January 2012(10)
  Class F     26,637  26,637 LIBOR + 1.335% January 2012(10)
  Class G     21,309  21,309 LIBOR + 1.435% January 2012(10)
  Class H     26,637  26,637 6.35% January 2012(10)
  Class J     26,637  26,637 6.35% May 2012(10)
  Class K     26,637  26,637 6.35% May 2012(10)
     
 
    
  Total iStar Asset Receivables secured notes     679,685  876,368    
  Less: debt discount     (4,090) (4,425)   
 
STARs Series 2003-1:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Class A1     235,808   LIBOR + 0.25% October 28, 2005(11)
  Class A2     248,206   LIBOR + 0.35% August 28, 2010(11)
  Class B     18,452   LIBOR + 0.55% July 28, 2011(11)
  Class C     20,297   LIBOR + 0.65% April 28, 2012(11)
  Class D     12,916   LIBOR + 0.75% October 28, 2012(11)
  Class E     14,762   LIBOR + 1.05% May 28, 2013(11)
  Class F     14,762   LIBOR + 1.10% June 28, 2013(11)
  Class G     12,916   LIBOR + 1.25% June 28, 2013(11)
  Class H     12,916   4.97% June 28, 2013(11)
  Class J     14,761   5.07% June 28, 2013(11)
  Class K     25,833   5.56% June 28, 2013(11)
     
 
    
  Total STARS Series 2003-1     631,629      
     
 
    
Total iStar Asset Receivables secured notes     1,307,224  871,943    

Unsecured notes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 6.00% Senior Notes(12)(13)     350,000   6.10% December 2010
 6.50% Senior Notes(12)(14)     150,000   6.60% December 2013
 6.75% Dealer Remarketable Securities(15)(16)       125,000 6.75% March 2013
 7.00% Senior Notes(13)(15)     185,000   7.00% March 2008
 7.70% Notes(13)(16)     100,000  100,000 7.70% July 2017
 7.95% Notes(13)(16)     50,000  50,000 7.95% May 2006
 8.75% Notes     350,000  350,000 8.75% August 2008
     
 
    
 Total unsecured notes     1,185,000  625,000    
 Less: debt discount     (47,921) (11,603)   
 Plus: impact of pay-floating swap agreements(17)     690  3,920    
     
 
    
 Total unsecured notes     1,137,769  617,317    

Other debt obligations

 

 

 

 

 

34,148

 

 

15,961

 

Various

 

Various
     
 
    
Total debt obligations    $4,113,732 $3,461,590    
     
 
    
 Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     24,000   LIBOR + 1.25% November 2004
 Secured by corporate tenant lease assets     92,296  92,876 6.00% — 11.38% Various through 2022
 Secured by corporate bond investments(5)     181,282   LIBOR + 1.05% — 1.50% January 2006
 Secured by corporate lending investments     77,628  77,938 6.55% November 2005
 Secured by corporate lending investments     60,699  60,874 6.41% January 2013
 Secured by corporate lending investments       60,000 LIBOR + 2.50% June 2004(6)
 Secured by corporate lending investments     48,000  48,000 LIBOR + 2.125% July 2008
     
 
    
 Total term loans     799,816  808,128    
 Less: debt premium/(discount)     6,090  (128)   
     
 
    
 Total secured term loans     805,906  808,000    
iStar Asset Receivables secured notes:             
 STARs Series 2002-1:             
  Class A1     33,484  40,011 LIBOR + 0.26% June 2004(7)
  Class A2     381,296  381,296 LIBOR + 0.38% December 2009(7)
  Class B     39,955  39,955 LIBOR + 0.65% April 2011(7)
  Class C     26,637  26,637 LIBOR + 0.75% May 2011(7)
  Class D     21,310  21,310 LIBOR + 0.85% January 2012(7)
  Class E     42,619  42,619 LIBOR + 1.235% January 2012(7)
  Class F     26,637  26,637 LIBOR + 1.335% January 2012(7)
  Class G     21,309  21,309 LIBOR + 1.435% January 2012(7)
  Class H     26,637  26,637 6.35% January 2012(7)
  Class J     26,637  26,637 6.35% May 2012(7)
  Class K     26,637  26,637 6.35% May 2012(7)
     
 
    
  Total STARs Series 2002-1     673,158  679,685    
  Less: debt discount     (3,993) (4,090)   
     
 
    
 STARs Series 2003-1:             
  Class A1     208,467  235,808 LIBOR + 0.25% October 2005(8)
  Class A2     225,227  248,206 LIBOR + 0.35% August 2010 (8)
  Class B     16,744  18,452 LIBOR + 0.55% July 2011(8)
  Class C     18,418  20,297 LIBOR + 0.65% April 2012(8)
  Class D     11,720  12,916 LIBOR + 0.75% October 2012(8)
  Class E     13,395  14,762 LIBOR + 1.05% May 2013(8)
  Class F     13,395  14,762 LIBOR + 1.10% June 2013(8)
  Class G     11,720  12,916 LIBOR + 1.25% June 2013(8)
  Class H     11,721  12,916 4.97% June 2013(8)
  Class J     13,394  14,761 5.07% June 2013(8)
  Class K     23,441  25,833 5.56% June 2013(8)
     
 
    
  Total STARS Series 2003-1     567,642  631,629    
     
 
    
  Total iStar Asset Receivables secured notes     1,236,807  1,307,224    
Unsecured notes:             
 LIBOR + 1.25% Senior Notes(9)     175,000   LIBOR + 1.25% March 2007
 4.875% Senior Notes(10)     350,000   4.875% January 2009
 5.125% Senior Notes(11)     250,000   5.125% April 2011
 5.70% Senior Notes(12)     250,000   5.70% March 2014
 6.00% Senior Notes     350,000  350,000 6.10% December 2010
 6.50% Senior Notes     150,000  150,000 6.60% December 2013
 7.00% Senior Notes     185,000  185,000 7.00% March 2008
              


 7.70% Notes(13)(14)     100,000  100,000 7.70% July 2017
 7.95% Notes(13)(14)     50,000  50,000 7.95% May 2006
 8.75% Notes(15)     240,000  350,000 8.75% August 2008
     
 
    
 Total unsecured notes     2,100,000  1,185,000    
 Less: debt discount     (63,478) (47,921)   
 Plus: impact of pay-floating swap agreements(16)     20,351  690    
     
 
    
 Total unsecured notes     2,056,873  1,137,769    
Other debt obligations       34,148 Various Various
     
 
    
Total debt obligations    $4,630,443 $4,113,732    
     
 
    

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Substantially all variable-rate debt obligations are based on 30-day LIBOR and reprice monthly. The 30-day LIBOR rate on DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 was 1.12% per annum.1.09%.

(2)
On March 12, 2004, this secured facility was amended to reduce the maximum amount available to $250.0 million, to shorten the maturity to March 2005 and to reduce the stated interest rate on first mortgages and CTL assets to LIBOR + 1.50% and on subordinate and mezzanine lending investments to LIBOR + 2.05%.

(3)
Maturity date reflects a one-year "term-out" extension at our option.

(3)
On November 4, 2003, this secured facility was amended to include subordinate and mezzanine lending investments as collateral at stated interest rates of LIBOR + 2.15%–2.25%. First mortgages remained at a stated interest rate of LIBOR + 1.75%.

46


(4)
On May 14, 2003,March 10, 2004, we extended the finalrepaid this $193.0 million term loan financing secured by 15 CTL assets with an original maturity on this facility toof July 2004.

(5)
Maturity date reflects two one-year extensions at our option.

(6)
On September 29, 2003,January 13, 2004, we closed $200.0 million of term financing with a $135.0 million term loanleading financial institution that is secured by acertain corporate tenant lease asset we acquired the same day.bond investments and other lending securities, of which $181.3 was outstanding at March 31, 2004. A number of these investments were previously financed under existing credit facilities. The loan has a five-year term andnew facility bears interest at LIBOR + 1.75%.1.05%-1.50% and has a final maturity date of January 2006.

(7)(6)
On May 8, 2003,January 9, 2004, we extended therepaid this term loan that had a final maturity on this facility toof June 2004.

(8)
On April 9, 2003, we repaid a term loan that financed a $75.0 million term preferred investment in a publicly-traded real estate company and simultaneously entered into another $50.0 million term loan with a leading financial institution. The new term loan had an interest rate of LIBOR + 0.60% and matured in October 2003.

(9)
On July 24, 2003, we closed a $48.0 million term loan secured by a corporate lending investment we originated in the third quarter of 2003. The loan has a three-year primary term and two one-year extension options and bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125%.

(10)(7)
Principal payments on these bonds are a function of the principal repayments on loan or corporate tenant leaseCTL assets which collateralize these obligations. The dates indicated above represent the expected date on which the final payment would occur for such class based on the assumptions that the loans which collateralize the obligations are not voluntarily prepaid, the loans are paid on their effective maturity dates and no extensions of the effective maturity dates of any of the loans are granted. The final maturity date for the underlying indenture on class A1 is May 28, 2017 and the final maturity date for classes A2, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J and K is May 28, 2020.

(11)(8)
Principal payments on these bonds are a function of the principal repayments on loan or corporate tenant leaseCTL assets which collateralize these obligations. The dates indicated above represent the expected date on which the final payment would occur for such class based on the assumptions that the loans which collateralize the obligations are not voluntarily prepaid, the loans are paid on their effective maturity dates and no extensions of the effective maturity dates of any of the loans are granted. The final maturity date for the underlying indenture is August 28, 2022.

(12)(9)
On December 5, 2003,March 12, 2004, we issued $175.0 million of Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2007. The Notes will bear interest at three-month LIBOR + 1.25%.

(10)
On January 23, 2004, we issued $350.0 million of 6.50%4.875% Senior Notes due 2010 and $150.0 million of 6.5% Senior Notes due in 2013.2009. The Notes due 2010 were sold at 99.44%99.89% of their principal amount and theto yield 4.90%. The Notes are our unsecured senior obligations.

(11)
On March 30, 2004, we issued $250.0 million of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2013 due 20132011. The Notes were sold at 99.28%99.825% of their principal amount.amount to yield 5.155%. The Notes are our unsecured senior obligations.

(12)
On March 9, 2004, we issued $250.0 million of 5.70% Senior Notes due 2014. The Notes were sold at 99.66% of their principal amount to yield 5.75%. The Notes are our unsecured senior obligations.

(13)
The Notes are callable by us at any time for an amount equal to the total of principal outstanding, accrued interest and the applicable make-whole prepayment premium.

(14)
We may redeem some or all of the Notes after December 15, 2008 at redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Notes.

(15)
On March 14, 2003, we retired the 6.75% Dealer Remarketable Securities of TriNet, our leasing subsidiary, by exchanging those securities for newly issued $150 million of 7.00% Senior Notes due March 2008. The covenants in the Senior Notes due 2008 are substantially identical to the covenants contained in our 8.75% Notes. On April 8, 2003, we issued an additional $35.0 million of Senior Notes bringing the aggregate principal of the Senior Notes to $185.0 million. The additional $35.0 million of Senior Notes has identical terms to the Senior Notes issued on March 14, 2003, but were issued at 102.75% of their principal amount to yield 6.34% per annum.

(16)
These obligations were assumed as part of the acquisition of TriNet. As part of the accounting for the purchase, these fixed-rate obligations were considered to have stated interest rates which were below the then-prevailing market rates at

(15)
On March 29, 2004, we redeemed approximately $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of these Senior Notes due 2008 at a price of 108.75% of their principal amount plus accrued interest to the redemption date.

(17)(16)
On January 23, 2004, we entered into four pay-floating interest rate swaps struck at 3.678%, 3.713%, 3.686% and 3.684% with notional amounts of $105.0 million, $100.0 million, $100.0 million and $45.0 million, respectively, and maturing on January 15, 2009. On December 19, 2003, we entered into three pay-floating interest rate swaps struck at 4.381%, 4.345% and 4.29% in the notional amounts of $200.0 million, $100.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively. On November 27, 2002, we entered into two pay-floating interest rate swaps struck at 3.8775% and 3.81% in the notional amounts of $100.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively. These swaps are intended to mitigate the risk of changes in the fair value of $350.0 million of 7-yearfive-year Senior Notes, $350.0 million of seven-year Senior Notes and $150.0 million of 10-year Senior Notes, respectively, attributable to changes in LIBOR. For accounting purposes, quarterly we adjust the value of the swap to its fair value and adjusts the carrying amount of the hedged liability by an offsetting amount.

47




DESCRIPTION OF SERIES B NOTES

        We issued the Series A Notes, and will issue the Series B Notes, under an Indenture (the "Indenture") dated January 23,March 30, 2004, between us and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"). The form and terms of the Series B Notes will be identical in all material respects with the form and terms of the Series A Notes, except that (1) the Series B Notes will have been registered under the Securities Act and, therefore, will not bear legends describing restrictions on transferring them, and (2) holders of Series B Notes will not be, and upon the consummation of the exchange offer, holders of Series A Notes will no longer be, entitled to certain rights under the registration rights agreement intended for the holders of unregistered securities. We have summarized in this section the principal terms of the Notes and the Indenture under which they were issued. This summary is not complete. You should read the Indenture and the Series B Notes for additional information before you decide to invest in the Series B Notes because they, and not this description, define your rights as holders of the Series B Notes. You may request copies of these documents at our address shown under the caption "Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference" on page [92]88 of this prospectus. The Indenture is subject to, and governed by, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the "TIA"). Any Series A Notes that remain outstanding after the completion of the exchange offer, together with the Series B Notes, will be treated as a single class of securities under the Indenture. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this section have the meanings specified in the Indenture. For purposes of this "Description of the Series B Notes," "iStar," "we," "our" or "us" refers to iStar Financial Inc. and does not include our subsidiaries.

        The Notes will be unsecured obligations of the Company, rankingpari passu in right of payment with all other senior unsecured obligations of the Company.

        The Company will issue the Notes in fully registered form in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof. The Trustee will initially act as Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes. The Notes may be presented for registration or transfer and exchange at the offices of the Registrar. The Company may change any Paying Agent and Registrar without notice to holders of the Notes (the "Holders"). The Company will pay principal (and premium, if any) on the Notes at the Trustee's corporate office in New York, New York. At the Company's option, interest may be paid at the Trustee's corporate trust office or by check mailed to the registered address of Holders.

Principal, Maturity and Interest

        The Notes are a series of securities issued under the Indenture. The Indenture permits the Company to "reopen" this series without the consent of the Holders, and issue additional Notes at any time on the same terms and conditions and with the same CUSIP number as the Notes being issued in this offering. The Notes will mature on January 15, 2009.April 1, 2011. Interest on the Notes will accrue at the rate of 4.875%5.125% per annum and will be payable semiannually in cash on each January 15April 1 and July 15,October 1, commencing on July 15,October 1, 2004 to the persons who are registered Holders at the close of business on the January 1March 15 and July 1September 15 immediately preceding the applicable interest payment date. Interest on the Notes will accrue from the most recent date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from and including the date of issuance.

        The Notes will not be entitled to the benefit of any mandatory sinking fund.

Redemption

        At any time on or prior to January 15, 2009,April 1, 2011, the Notes may be redeemed or purchased in whole but not in part at the Company's option at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the Applicable Premium as of, and accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to the date of the redemption or purchase (the "Redemption Date") (subject to the right of Holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date). Such redemption or purchase may

48




be made upon notice mailed by first-class mail to each Holder's registered address, not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the Redemption Date.

        "Applicable Premium" means, with respect to a Note at any Redemption Date, the greater of: (1) 1.0% of the principal amount of such Note; and (2) the excess of (a) the present value at such Redemption Date of (i) the principal amount of such Note on January 15, 2009April 1, 2011 plus (ii) all required remaining scheduled interest payments due on such Note through January 15, 2009,April 1, 2011, computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points; over (b) the principal amount of such Note on such Redemption Date. Calculation of the Applicable Premium will be made by the Company or on behalf of the Company by such Person as the Company shall designate;provided, however, that such calculation shall not be a duty or obligation of the Trustee.

        ""Treasury RateRate"" means, with respect to a Redemption Date, the yield to maturity at the time of computation of United States Treasury securities with a constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15(519) that has become publicly available at least two Business Days prior to such Redemption Date (or, if such Statistical Release is no longer published, any publicly available source of similar market data)) most nearly equal to the period from such Redemption Date to April 1, 2011provided,,however,, that if the period from such Redemption Date to January 15, 2009April 1, 2011 is not equal to the constant maturity of the United States Treasury security for which a weekly average yield is given, the Treasury Rate shall be obtained by linear interpolation (calculated to the nearest one-twelfth of a year) from the weekly average yields of United States Treasury securities for which such yields are given, except that if the period from such Redemption Date to January 15, 2009April 1, 2011 is less than one year, the weekly average yield on actually traded United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year shall be used.

Change of Control

        Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, each Holder will have the right to require that the Company purchase all or a portion of such Holder's Notes pursuant to the offer described below (the "Change of Control Offer"), at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the date of purchase.

        Within 30 days following the date upon which the Change of Control occurred, the Company must send, by first class mail, a notice to each Holder, with a copy to the Trustee, which notice shall govern the terms of the Change of Control Offer. Such notice shall state, among other things, the purchase date, which must be no earlier than 30 days nor later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed, other than as may be required by law (the "Change of Control Payment Date"). Holders electing to have a Note purchased pursuant to a Change of Control Offer will be required to surrender the Note, with the form entitled "Option of Holder to Elect Purchase" on the reverse of the Note completed, to the Paying Agent at the address specified in the notice prior to the close of business on the third business day prior to the Change of Control Payment Date.

        If a Change of Control Offer is made, we cannot assure you that the Company will have available funds sufficient to pay the Change of Control purchase price for all the Notes that might be delivered by Holders seeking to accept the Change of Control Offer. In the event the Company is required to purchase outstanding Notes pursuant to a Change of Control Offer, the Company expects that it would seek third party financing to the extent it does not have available funds to meet its purchase obligations. However, we cannot assure you that the Company would be able to obtain such financing.

        Neither the Board of Directors of the Company nor the Trustee may waive the covenant relating to a Holder's right to redemption upon a Change of Control. Restrictions in the Indenture described herein on the ability of the Company and its Subsidiaries to incur additional Indebtedness, to grant liens on its property and to make Restricted Payments may also make more difficult or discourage a takeover of the Company, whether favored or opposed by the management of the Company.



Consummation of any such transaction in certain circumstances may require redemption or repurchase

49



of the Notes, and we cannot assure you that the Company or the acquiring party will have sufficient financial resources to effect such redemption or repurchase. Such restrictions and the restrictions on transactions with Affiliates may, in certain circumstances, make more difficult or discourage any leveraged buyout of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries by the management of the Company. While such restrictions cover a wide variety of arrangements that have traditionally been used to effect highly leveraged transactions, the Indenture may not afford the Holders protection in all circumstances from the adverse aspects of a highly leveraged transaction, reorganization, restructuring, merger or similar transaction.

        The Company will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of Notes pursuant to a Change of Control Offer. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the "Change of Control" provisions of the Indenture, the Company shall comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and shall not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the "Change of Control" provisions of the Indenture by virtue thereof.

Certain Covenants

        The Indenture will contain, among others, the following covenants;provided that the Indenture will provide that the "Limitation on Liens," "Limitation on Restricted Payments," "Limitation on Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Subsidiaries," "Limitation on Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries," "Limitation of Guarantees by Subsidiaries," "Conduct of Business" and "Limitations on Transactions with Affiliates" covenants will not be applicable in the event, and only for so long as, the Notes are rated Investment Grade and no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing.

        Limitation on Incurrence of Additional Indebtedness.    The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create, incur, assume, guarantee, become liable, contingently or otherwise, with respect to, or otherwise become responsible for payment of (collectively, "incur") any Indebtedness (including, without limitation, Acquired Indebtedness) other than Permitted Indebtedness.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of or as a consequence of the incurrence of any such Indebtedness, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may incur Indebtedness (including, without limitation, Acquired Indebtedness), in each case if on the date of the incurrence of such Indebtedness, after giving effect to the incurrence thereof:

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company will not permit TriNet Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. ("TriNet") or any of its Subsidiaries to incur Indebtedness (as defined in the indenture governing TriNet's outstanding publicly held debt securities on the Measurement Date) if, immediately after giving effect to the incurrence of such Indebtedness and the application of the proceeds thereof, the aggregate principal amount of all outstanding Indebtedness of TriNet and its Subsidiaries on a



consolidated basis determined in accordance with GAAP is greater than 55% of the sum of (without duplication): (1) the Total Assets (as defined in the indenture governing TriNet's outstanding

50



publicly-held debt securities on the Measurement Date) of TriNet and its Subsidiaries as of the end of the calendar quarter covered in TriNet's Annual Report on Form 10-K or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as the case may be, most recently filed with the Commission (or, if such filing is not permitted under the Exchange Act, with the Trustee) prior to the incurrence of such additional Indebtedness; and (2) the purchase price of any real estate assets or mortgages receivable acquired, and the amount of any securities offering proceeds received (to the extent that such proceeds were not used to acquire real estate assets or mortgages receivable or used to reduce Indebtedness), by TriNet or any Subsidiary of TriNet since the end of such calendar quarter, including those proceeds obtained in connection with the incurrence of such additional Indebtedness. The above limitation shall terminate immediately upon TriNet ceasing to exist as a Subsidiary of the Company as a result of a merger or consolidation of TriNet with the Company or the sale, transfer, disposition or distribution of all or substantially all of TriNet's assets to the Company.

        Limitation on Restricted Payments.    The Company will not, and will not cause or permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly:

        if at the time of such action (each, a "Restricted Payment") or immediately after giving effect thereto,