As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 2010.April 8, 2011

Registration No. 333-_____333-      

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



 

Form S-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933



 

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

  
Delaware 6036 34-3510455
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

 
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
(413) 443-5601
 Michael P. Daly
President and Chief Executive Officer
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
(413) 443-5601
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including
area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)


 

Copies to:

 
Lawrence M. F. Spaccasi, Esq.
Marc Levy, Esq.
Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C.
5335 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 780
Washington, D.C. 20015
(202) 274-2000
Facsimile: (202) 362-2902
 Matthew DyckmanMichael Krebs, Esq.
Rosemary SpazianiAdam Ghander, Esq.
SNR Denton USNutter McClennen & Fish LLP
1301 K Street, N.W.Seaport West
Washington, D.C. 20005155 Seaport Boulevard
(202) 408-6400Boston, MA 02210
(617) 310-9000
Facsimile: (202) 408-6399(617) 310-9000


 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement and the conditions to the consummation of the merger described herein have been satisfied or waived.

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.o

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

   
Large accelerated filero Accelerated filerx Non-accelerated filero Smaller reporting companyo

If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer)o
Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer)o

Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer)o

Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer)o


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

        
Title of each class of securities to be registered Amount to be registered Proposed maximum
offering price
per share
 Proposed maximum
aggregate
offering price
 Amount of
registration fee
 Amount to be
registered
 Proposed maximum
offering price
per share
 Proposed maximum
aggregate
offering price
 Amount of
registration fee
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share  2,684,317 shares(1)  $10.965(2)  $29,433,536(2)  $2,099(3)   6,203,000 shares(1)  $13.115(2)  $81,352,345(2)  $9,445(3) 

(1)Represents the maximum number of shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. (Nasdaq: BHLB) common stock estimated to be issuable upon the completion of the merger of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. (Nasadaq: ROME)(Nasdaq: LGCY), with and into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., based on the product of (x) the number of shares of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. common stock outstanding or reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards as of November 23, 2010,April 4, 2011, (y) an exchange ratio of 0.56580.56385 shares, and (z) 70%90% (the portion of the merger consideration consisting of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, IncInc. common stock issuable in the merger).
(2)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee required by Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and calculated in accordance with Rule 457(f) (1) and Rule 457(c) of the Securities Act, based on the market value of the shares of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. common stock expected to be exchanged in connection with the merger, as established by the average of the high and low sales prices of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on November 16, 2010April 4, 2011 of $10.965.$13.115.
(3)Calculated in accordance with Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and SEC Fee Advisory #4#5 for Fiscal Year 20102011 at a rate equal to 0.00007130.0001161 multiplied by the proposed maximum aggregate offering price.


 

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRELIMINARY JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
DATED APRIL 8, 2011, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A registration statement relating to the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be issued in the merger has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomebecomes effective. This proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale is not permitted or would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUSDATED NOVEMBER 23, 2010, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

[BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. LOGO      ROME BANCORP, INC. LOGO

MERGER PROPOSED — YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANTLOGO]

The boards of directors ofDear Berkshire Hills Bancorp Stockholder:

On December 21, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Romeentered into a merger agreement to acquire Legacy Bancorp, Inc. have agreed toin a merger of our companies.stock and cash transaction. If the merger agreement is approved and the merger is subsequently completed, each shareLegacy Bancorp, Inc. will merge into Berkshire Hills Bancorp.

The shares of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. common stock owned by each Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholder will be converted into the right to receive either 0.56580.56385 shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock or $11.25and $1.30 in cash, subject to 70% of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock being exchanged forcash. If Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock and 30% of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock being exchanged for cash.Legacy must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a requirement contained in any regulatory approval, and if the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sreceives for those divested deposits exceeds 350 basis points, then Berkshire Hills will be required under the Merger Agreement to make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders that, in the aggregate, will continueequal 50% of the premium in excess of 350 basis points (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium). Such payment would occur following completion of any such divestiture which is anticipated to own their existing shares. Afteroccur after completion of the merger, we expect that current Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholders will own approximately __%Merger.

The maximum number of the combined company and Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders will own approximately __% of the combined company. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “BHLB.” On _______, 2010, the closing priceshares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock was $_____.estimated to be issuable upon completion of the merger is 6,203,000.

As a result of the merger, Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholders will become stockholders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. is offering approximately _______ shares

Your board of its common stock to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders.

We expectdirectors has unanimously determined that the merger to generally be tax-free for federal income tax purposes solely to holdersand the merger agreement are fair and in the best interests of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock to the extent they receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” adoption of the merger agreement.The merger cannot be completed unless a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Any cash consideration received will be taxable to Romestock of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholders.

We cannot completevote to adopt the merger unless we obtain the necessary government approvals and unless the stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. approve the merger agreement. Rome Bancorp, Inc. is asking its stockholders to consider and vote on this merger proposal at its special meeting of stockholders. Whether or not you plan to attend the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholderspecial meeting of stockholders, please take the time to vote by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card to Rome Bancorp, Inc. and mailing it in the enclosed envelope.If you sign, date and mail your proxy card without indicating how you want to vote, your proxy will be counted as a vote“FOR” the merger and the transactions contemplated by “FOR” adoption of the merger agreement. If you do not return your proxy card,fail to vote, or if you do not instruct your broker how to vote any shares held for you in “street name,” it will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” the merger agreement.

In addition, Berkshire Hills stockholders will consider an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock we are authorized to issue from 26 million shares to 50 million shares. This proposal is separate and distinct from, and not conditioned upon, the outcome of the stockholder vote for the proposed merger with Legacy Bancorp, Inc.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The accompanying document is also being delivered to Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholders as Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s prospectus for its offering of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in connection with the merger, and as a proxy statement for the solicitation of proxies from Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholders to vote for the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger.

This Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus provides you with detailed information about the proposed merger. It also contains or references information about Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Legacy Bancorp, Inc. and related matters. You are encouraged to read this document carefully.In particular, you should read the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 7 for a discussion of the risks you should consider in evaluating the proposed merger and how it will affect you.

Voting procedures are described in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Your vote is important, so I urge you to cast it promptly. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s management enthusiastically supports the acquisition of Legacy Bancorp, Inc., and joins with our board of directors in recommending that you vote “FOR” adoption of the merger agreement. We also recommend that you vote “FOR” the amendment of our Certificate of Incorporation.

Sincerely,


Michael P. Daly
President and Chief Executive Officer


TABLE OF CONTENTS

[LEGACY BANCORP, INC. LOGO]

Dear Legacy Bancorp Stockholder:

On December 21, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. entered into a merger agreement to acquire Legacy Bancorp, Inc. in a stock and cash transaction. If the merger agreement is approved and the merger is subsequently completed, Legacy Bancorp, Inc. will merge into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.

Each share of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. common stock owned by each Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholder will be converted into the right to receive 0.56385 shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and $1.30 in cash. If Berkshire Hills and Legacy must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a vote againstrequirement contained in any regulatory approval, and if the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits exceeds 350 basis points, then Berkshire Hills will be required under the Merger Agreement to make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders that, in the aggregate, will equal 50% of the premium in excess of 350 basis points (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium). Such payment would occur following completion of any such divestiture which is anticipated to occur after completion of the merger.

The maximum number of shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock estimated to be issuable upon completion of the merger agreement.is.

RomeAs a result of the merger, Legacy Bancorp, Inc.’s stockholders will become stockholders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.

Your board of directors has unanimously determined that the merger is advisable,and the merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that you vote FOR“FOR” adoption of the merger agreement.The merger cannot be completed unless a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. entitled to be cast vote to adopt the merger agreement. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting of stockholders, please take the time to vote by completing the enclosed proxy card and mailing it in the enclosed envelope.If you sign, date and mail your proxy card without indicating how you want to vote, your proxy will be counted as a vote “FOR” adoption of the merger agreement. If you fail to vote, or you do not instruct your broker how to vote any shares held for you in “street name,” it will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” the merger agreement.

The accompanying document is being delivered to Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholders as Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s prospectus for its offering of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in connection with the merger, and as a proxy statement for the solicitation of proxies from Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholders to vote for the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger agreement.merger.

The place, dateLegacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholders have dissenters’ rights and timemay receive payment in cash of the Romefair value of their shares, excluding any appreciation in value that results from the merger. To maintain dissenters’ rights, a stockholder must (1) deliver written notice of its intent to demand payment for its shares to Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholders’before the special meeting of Legacy stockholders or at the special meeting but before the vote is taken and (2) either vote against the merger or not submit a proxy. See“Questions and Answers About the Merger and the Special Meetings” on page ii and“Rights of Dissenting Stockholders” on page 34. A copy of the section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertaining to dissenters’ rights is included as follows:

The Rome Savings Bank
100 W. Dominick Street
Rome, New York
[Date]
5:30 p.m., local timeAppendix D to the accompanying Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

This documentJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus provides you with detailed information about the proposed merger. It also contains a more complete description of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders’ meeting and the terms of the merger. We urge you to review this entire document carefully. You may also obtainor references information about Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. from documentsand Legacy Bancorp, Inc. and related matters. You are encouraged to read this document carefully.In particular, you should read the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 7 for a discussion of the risks you should consider in evaluating the proposed merger and how it has filedwill affect you.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Voting procedures are described in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Your vote is important, so I urge you to cast it promptly. Legacy Bancorp, Inc.’s management enthusiastically supports the merger with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., and joins with our board of directors in recommending that you vote “FOR” adoption of the Securities and Exchange Commission.merger agreement.

 
Michael P. Daly Charles M. SprockSincerely,
President and J. Williar Dunlaevy
Chief Executive Officer
President and Chief Executive Officer
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Rome Bancorp, Inc.Chairman of the Board

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the merger or the securities to be issued under this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or determined if this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. The securities we are offering through this document are not savings or deposit accounts or other obligations of any bank or non-bank subsidiary of either of our companies, and they are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency.

Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated _______
and first mailed to stockholders on or about _________

This document incorporates important


TABLE OF CONTENTS

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

Both Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Legacy Bancorp, Inc. file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other business and financial information about Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. from documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that have not been included in or delivered with this document.(the “SEC”). You may read and copy these documentsany materials that either Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Legacy Bancorp, Inc. files with the SEC at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s public reference facilities.SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330(800) SEC-0330 ((800) 732-0330) for further information on the public reference room. In addition, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Legacy Bancorp, Inc. file reports and other business and financial information with the SEC electronically, and the SEC maintains a website located athttp://www.sec.gov containing this information. You will also be able to obtain these documents, free of charge, from Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. atwww.berkshirebank.com under the “Investor Relations” link and then under the heading “SEC filings” or from Legacy Bancorp, Inc. by accessing Legacy Bancorp, Inc.’s website atwww.legacybanks.com under the “Investors” link and then under the heading “SEC Filings.”

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has filed a registration statement on Form S-4 to register with the SEC up to 6,203,000 shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. This Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is a part of that registration statement. As permitted by SEC rules, this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement or in the exhibits or schedules to the registration statement. You may read and copy the registration statement, including any amendments, schedules and exhibits at the addresses set forth below. Statements contained in this document as to the contents of any contract or other documents referred to in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus are not necessarily complete. In each case, you should refer to the copy of the applicable contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. This Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus incorporates by reference documents that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Legacy Bancorp, Inc. have previously filed with the SEC. They contain important information about the companies and their financial condition. See“Where You Can Find More Information” on page 96. These documents are available without charge to you upon written or oral request to the applicable company’s principal executive offices. The respective addresses and telephone numbers of such principal executive offices are listed below:

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
Attention: Investor Relations Department
(413) 236-3239
Legacy Bancorp, Inc.
99 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
Attention: Investor Relations
(413) 445-3513

To obtain timely delivery of these facilities. documents, you must request the information no later than ____________ in order to receive them before Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s special meeting of stockholders and no later than ____________ in order to receive them before Legacy Bancorp, Inc.’s special meeting of stockholders.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BHLB,” and Legacy Bancorp, Inc. common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “LEGC.”


TABLE OF CONTENTS

BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.

24 NORTH STREET
PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 02101

NOTICE OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON ____________, 2011

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the stockholders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will be held at ___________________________, at __:00 _.m., Eastern Standard Time, on _______________, 2011, for the following purposes:

1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 21, 2010, by and between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Legacy Bancorp, Inc., and thereby to approve the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. with and into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.;

2. The amendment of our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock we are authorized to issue from 26 million to 50 million;

3. To approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the merger; and

4. To transact any other business which may properly come before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The proposed merger is described in more detail in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which you should read carefully in its entirety before you vote. A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Appendix A to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Only Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholders of record as of the close of business on ______________, 2011, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting of stockholders or any adjournments of the special meeting.

To ensure your representation at the special meeting of stockholders, please follow the voting procedures described in the accompanying Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and on the enclosed proxy card.This will not prevent you from voting in person, but it will help to secure a quorum and avoid added solicitation costs. Your proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted.

BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT, “FOR” THE AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, AND “FOR” THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL DESCRIBED ABOVE.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Wm. Gordon Prescott
Corporate Secretary and General Counsel

Pittsfield, Massachusetts
_____________, 2011


TABLE OF CONTENTS

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON, BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP URGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE BY COMPLETING, SIGNING AND RETURNING THE PROXY CARD OR VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished to you by such record holder.

If you have any questions concerning the merger or other matters to be considered at the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. special meeting, would like additional copies of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or need help voting your shares, please contact Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s proxy solicitor:

Phoenix Advisory Partners, LLC
110 Wall Street, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10005
1-800-________ (toll free)
1-212-__________ (call collect)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

LEGACY BANCORP, INC.

99 NORTH STREET
PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 01201

NOTICE OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON ______________________, 2011

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the stockholders of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. will be held at the ______________________________ at __:00 _.m., Eastern Standard Time, on _______________, 2011, for the following purposes:

1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 21, 2010, by and between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Legacy Bancorp, Inc., and thereby to approve the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. with and into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.;

2. To approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the merger; and

3. To transact any other business which may properly come before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The proposed merger is described in more detail in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which you should read carefully in its entirety before voting. A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Appendix A to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Only Legacy Bancorp, Inc. stockholders of record as of the close of business on _________________, 2011, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting of stockholders or any adjournments of the special meeting.

To ensure your representation at the special meeting of stockholders, please follow the voting procedures described in the accompanying Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and on the enclosed proxy card.This will not prevent you from voting in person, but it will help to secure a quorum and avoid added solicitation costs. Your proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Kimberly A. Mathews
Corporate Secretary and General Counsel

Pittsfield, Massachusetts
_________________, 2011

LEGACY BANCORP, INC.’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND “FOR” THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL DESCRIBED ABOVE.

DO NOT SEND STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH THE PROXY CARD. YOU WILL RECEIVE A LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL WITH INSTRUCTIONS FOR DELIVERING YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATES UNDER SEPARATE COVER.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE LEGACY BANCORP, INC. SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON, LEGACY BANCORP, INC. URGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE BY COMPLETING, SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished to you by such record holder.

If you have any questions concerning the merger or other matters to be considered at the Legacy Bancorp, Inc. special meeting, would like additional copies of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or need help voting your shares, please contact Legacy Bancorp, Inc.’s proxy solicitor:

Phoenix Advisory Partners, LLC
110 Wall Street, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10005
1-800-________ (toll free)
1-212-__________ (call collect)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETINGSii
SUMMARY1
RISK FACTORS7
CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS11
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION12
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.13
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF LEGACY BANCORP, INC.15
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ROME AND LEGACY MERGERS17
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION29
SPECIAL MEETING OF LEGACY BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS30
SPECIAL MEETING OF BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS32
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING LEGACY BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS34
DESCRIPTION OF THE MERGER38
DESCRIPTION OF BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. CAPITAL STOCK87
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS89
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS AFTER THE MERGER92
BERKSHIRE HILLS PROPOSAL II — AMENDMENT OF THE BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK93
ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETINGS94
LEGAL MATTERS94
EXPERTS94
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS95
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION96
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. FILINGS (FILE NO. 000-51584)97
LEGACY BANCORP, INC. FILINGS (FILE NO. 000-51525)98

Appendix A

Agreement and Plan of Merger

A-1

Appendix B

Fairness Opinion of Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc.

B-1

Appendix C

Fairness Opinion of Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.

C-1

Appendix D

Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (Dissenters’ rights)

D-1

Appendix E

Text of Proposed Amendment to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation

E-1

i


TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETINGS

The following are answers to certain questions that you may have regarding the merger and the special meetings. We urge you to read carefully the remainder of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus because the information in this section may not provide all the information that might be important to you in determining how to vote. Additional important information is also availablecontained in the appendices to, and the documents incorporated by reference in, this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

Q:WHY AM I RECEIVING THIS DOCUMENT?
A.Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. (“Berkshire Hills”) and Legacy Bancorp, Inc. (“Legacy”) have agreed to combine under the terms of a Merger Agreement by and between Berkshire Hills and Legacy dated as of December 21, 2010 (the “Merger Agreement”) that is described in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Appendix A. In order to complete the merger of Legacy into Berkshire Hills (the “Merger”), the stockholders of each company must vote to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger. Both Legacy and Berkshire Hills will hold special meetings of their respective stockholders to obtain these approvals. This Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus contains important information about the Merger, the Merger Agreement, the special meetings, and other related matters, and you should read it carefully.
Q:WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO LEGACY AS A RESULT OF THE MERGER?
A:If the Merger is completed, Legacy will merge into Berkshire Hills, and Legacy will cease to exist. At a time to be determined following the Merger, Legacy Banks, a wholly owned subsidiary of Legacy, will merge with and into Berkshire Bank, a Massachusetts savings bank and wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hills, with Berkshire Bank being the surviving bank.
Q:WHAT WILL LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS RECEIVE IN THE MERGER?
A:If the Merger-related proposals are approved and the Merger is subsequently completed, each outstanding share of Legacy common stock (other than any dissenting shares) will be converted into the right to receive:
0.56385 shares of Berkshire Hills common stock; and
$1.30 in cash, without interest.

If Berkshire Hills and Legacy must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a requirement contained in any regulatory approval, and if the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits exceeds 350 basis points, then Berkshire Hills will be required under the Merger Agreement to make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders that, in the aggregate, will equal 50% of the premium in excess of 350 basis points (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium). Such payment would occur following completion of any such divestiture which is anticipated to occur after completion of the Merger.

Q:WHEN WILL THE MERGER BE COMPLETED?
A:We expect the Merger will be completed when all of the conditions to completion contained in the Merger Agreement are satisfied or waived, including the receipt of required regulatory approvals, the approval of the Merger Agreement by Berkshire Hills stockholders at the Berkshire Hills special meeting and the adoption of the Merger Agreement by Legacy stockholders at the Legacy special meeting. We currently expect to complete the Merger during the third calendar quarter of 2011. However, because fulfillment of some of the conditions to completion of the Merger, such as the receipt of required regulatory approvals, is not entirely within our control, we cannot predict the actual timing.
Q:WHAT HAPPENS IF THE MERGER IS NOT COMPLETED?
A:If the Merger is not completed, Legacy stockholders will not receive any consideration for their shares of common stock in connection with the Merger. Instead, Legacy will remain an independent company and its common stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Market. Under specified

ii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

circumstances, Legacy may be required to pay to Berkshire Hills a fee with respect to the termination of the Merger Agreement, as described under “Terminating the Merger Agreement” and “Termination Fee” beginning on page 85.
Q:WHO IS BEING ASKED TO APPROVE MATTERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER?
A:Berkshire Hills stockholders and Legacy stockholders are being asked to vote to approve the Merger-related proposals.

Under Delaware law, the Merger cannot be completed unless Berkshire Hills stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger. By this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, Berkshire Hills’s board of directors is soliciting proxies of Berkshire Hills stockholders to provide this approval at the Internet sitespecial meeting of Berkshire Hills stockholders discussed below.

Under Delaware law, the SEC maintainsMerger cannot be completed unless Legacy stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger. By this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, Legacy’s board of directors is soliciting proxies of Legacy stockholders to provide this approval at the special meeting of Legacy stockholders discussed below.

Q:SHOULD LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS SEND IN THEIR STOCK CERTIFICATES NOW?
A:No. Legacy stockholdersSHOULD NOTsend in any stock certificates now. If the Merger is approved, transmittal materials, with instructions for their completion, will be provided to Legacy stockholders under separate cover and the stock certificates should be sent at that time.
Q:WHAT ARE THE MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS?
A:Berkshire Hills and Legacy will not be required to complete the Merger unless they receive legal opinions from their respective counsel to the effect that the Merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes. Provided that the Merger qualifies as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes, the specific tax consequences of the Merger to a Legacy stockholder will depend upon the form of consideration such stockholder will receive in the Merger. Since you will receive a combination of Berkshire Hills common stock and cash, other than cash instead of a fractional share of Berkshire Hills common stock, in exchange for your Legacy common stock, then you may recognize gain, but you will not recognize loss, upon the exchange of your shares of Legacy common stock for shares of Berkshire Hills common stock and cash. If the sum of the fair market value of the Berkshire Hills common stock and the amount of cash you receive in exchange for your shares of Legacy common stock exceeds the cost basis of your shares of Legacy common stock, you will recognize taxable gain equal to the lesser of the amount of such excess or the amount of cash you receive in the exchange. Generally, any gain recognized upon the exchange will be capital gain, and any such capital gain will be long-term capital gain if you have established a holding period of more than one year for your shares of Legacy common stock. Depending on certain facts specific to you, any gain could instead be characterized as ordinary dividend income.

For a more detailed discussion of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the transaction, including the tax consequences of the aggregate divestiture premium (described on pages 68 and 70) that may be paid to Legacy stockholders as additional cash consideration for such stockholders’ shares of Legacy common stock, please see the section “http://www.sec.gov.Description of the Merger — Material Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 68.

The consequences of the Merger to any particular stockholder will depend on that stockholder’s particular facts and circumstances. Accordingly, you are urged to consult your tax advisor to determine your tax consequences from the Merger.

iii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Q:ARE DISSENTING LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS ENTITLED TO APPRAISAL RIGHTS?
A:Yes. Delaware law provides dissenters’ rights in the merger to Legacy Bancorp stockholders. This means that Legacy Bancorp stockholders are legally entitled to receive payment in cash of the fair value of their shares, excluding any appreciation in value that results from the merger. To maintain your dissenters’ rights you must (1) deliver written notice of your intent to demand payment for your shares to Legacy Bancorp’s Secretary at 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201 before the special meeting of Legacy Bancorp stockholders or at the special meeting but before the vote is taken and (2) either vote against the merger or not submit a proxy. This notice must be in addition to and separate from any failure to vote, abstention from voting, or any vote, in person or by proxy, cast against approval of the merger. Neither voting against, abstaining from voting, or failing to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement will constitute notice of intent to demand payment or demand for payment of fair value under Delaware law. Your failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under Delaware law will result in the loss of your dissenters’ rights. A copy of the section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertaining to dissenters’ rights is provided as Appendix D to this document. See “Rights of Dissenting Legacy Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders” on page 34.

Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, record holders of Legacy common stock who do not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and who deliver a notice of intent to demand payment will be entitled to seek appraisal rights in connection with the Merger, and if the Merger is completed, obtain payment in cash equal to the fair value of their shares of Legacy common stock as determined by the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, instead of the Merger consideration. To exercise their appraisal rights, Legacy stockholders must strictly follow the procedures prescribed by Delaware law. These procedures are summarized in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. In addition, the text of the applicable provisions of Delaware law is included as Appendix D to this document. Failure to strictly comply with these provisions will result in the loss of appraisal rights. For a more complete description of appraisal rights, please refer to the section entitled “Appraisal Rights” beginning on page D-1.

Q:ARE THERE RISKS THAT I SHOULD CONSIDER IN DECIDING WHETHER TO VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE MERGER-RELATED PROPOSALS?
A:Yes. You should read and carefully consider the risk factors set forth in the section of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7.
Q:WHEN AND WHERE WILL LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS MEET?
A:Legacy will hold a special meeting of its stockholders on ___________, 2011, at _____ _.m., Eastern Time, at _________________, located at __________________.
Q:WHAT MATTERS ARE LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS BEING ASKED TO APPROVE AT THE LEGACY SPECIAL MEETING PURSUANT TO THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS?
A:Legacy stockholders are being asked to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger. We refer to this proposal as the “Legacy Merger Agreement proposal.”

Legacy stockholders also are being asked to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the Legacy Merger Agreement proposal, which we refer to as the “Legacy adjournment proposal.”

Q:WHAT DOES LEGACY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND WITH RESPECT TO THE TWO PROPOSALS?
A:Legacy’s board of directors has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and determined that the Merger Agreement and the Merger are fair to and in the best interests of Legacy and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that Legacy stockholders vote “FOR” the Legacy Merger Agreement proposal.

iv


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Legacy’s board of directors also unanimously recommends that Legacy stockholders vote “FOR” the Legacy adjournment proposal.

Q:DID THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LEGACY RECEIVE AN OPINION FROM A FINANCIAL ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE MERGER?
A:Yes. On December 21, 2010, Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc., which we refer to in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as “KBW,” rendered its oral opinion to the board of directors of Legacy, which was confirmed in writing on December 21, 2010, that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions described to the Legacy board during its presentation and set forth in the opinion, the consideration in the proposed Merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to holders of Legacy common stock. The full text of KBW’s written opinion is attached as Appendix B to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Legacy stockholders are urged to read the opinion carefully.
Q:WHO CAN VOTE AT THE LEGACY SPECIAL MEETING?
A:Holders of record of Legacy common stock at the close of business on _________, 2011, which is the record date for the Legacy special meeting, are entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Q:HOW MANY VOTES MUST BE REPRESENTED IN PERSON OR BY PROXY AT THE LEGACY SPECIAL MEETING TO HAVE A QUORUM?
A:The holders of a majority of the shares of Legacy common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the special meeting.
Q:WHAT VOTE BY LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE LEGACY SPECIAL MEETING PROPOSALS?
A:Assuming a quorum is present at the Legacy special meeting, approval of the Legacy Merger Agreement proposal will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Legacy common stock entitled to be cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as shares voted against the Merger Agreement proposal.

Approval of the Legacy adjournment proposal will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Legacy common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote on the Legacy adjournment proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as shares voted against the Legacy adjournment proposal, and broker non-votes will not affect whether the Legacy adjournment proposal is approved.

As of the record date for the special meeting, directors and executive officers of Legacy, together with their affiliates, had sole or shared voting power over approximately ____% of the Legacy common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting.

Q:HOW MAY THE LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING PROPOSALS PRESENTED IN THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS?
A:Legacy stockholders may vote by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the enclosed prepaid return envelope as soon as possible. This will enable their shares to be represented and voted at the special meeting. If your stock is held in street name, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee that you must follow to have your shares voted. Your broker, bank or other nominee may allow you to deliver your voting instructions via the telephone or the Internet. Please review the proxy card or instruction form provided by your broker, bank or other nominee that accompanies this proxy statement.

v


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Q:WILL A BROKER OR BANK HOLDING SHARES IN “STREET NAME” FOR A LEGACY STOCKHOLDER AUTOMATICALLY VOTE THOSE SHARES FOR THE STOCKHOLDER AT THE LEGACY SPECIAL MEETING?
A:No. A broker or bankWILL NOTbe able to vote your shares with respect to the Legacy Merger Agreement proposal without first receiving instructions from you on how to vote. If your shares are held in “street name,” you will receive separate voting instructions with your proxy materials. It is therefore important that you provide timely instruction to your broker or bank to ensure that all shares of Legacy common stock that you own are voted at the special meeting.
Q:WILL LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS BE ABLE TO VOTE THEIR SHARES AT THE LEGACY SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON?
A:Yes. Submitting a proxy will not affect the right of any Legacy stockholder to vote in person at the special meeting. If a Legacy stockholder holds shares in “street name,” the stockholder must ask its broker or bank how to vote those shares in person at the special meeting.
Q:WHAT DO LEGACY STOCKHOLDERS NEED TO DO NOW?
A:After carefully reading and considering the information contained in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, Legacy stockholders are requested to vote by mail or by attending the special meeting and voting in person. If you choose to vote by mail, you should complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card. The proxy card will instruct the persons named on the proxy card to vote the stockholder’s Legacy shares at the special meeting as the stockholder directs. If a stockholder signs and sends in a proxy card and does not indicate how the stockholder wishes to vote, the proxy will be voted “FOR” both of the special meeting proposals.
Q:WHAT SHOULD A LEGACY STOCKHOLDER DO IF HE OR SHE RECEIVES MORE THAN ONE SET OF VOTING MATERIALS?
A:As a Legacy stockholder, you may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and multiple Legacy proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your Legacy shares in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold Legacy shares. If you are a holder of record and your Legacy shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. In addition, if you are a holder of both Legacy common stock and Berkshire Hills common stock, you will receive one or more separate proxy cards or voting instruction cards for each company. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive or otherwise follow the voting instructions set forth in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus in the sections entitled “Special Meeting of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders” and “Special Meeting of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders.”
Q:MAY A LEGACY STOCKHOLDER CHANGE OR REVOKE THE STOCKHOLDER’S VOTE AFTER SUBMITTING A PROXY?
A:Yes. If you have not voted through your broker, you can change your vote by:
providing written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary of Legacy, which must be filed with the Corporate Secretary by the time the special meeting begins;
submitting a new proxy card (any earlier proxies will be revoked automatically); or
attending the special meeting and voting in person. Any earlier proxy will be revoked. However, simply attending the special meeting without voting will not revoke your proxy.

If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must follow your broker’s directions to change your vote.

vi


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Q:WHAT HAPPENS IF I SELL MY SHARES OF LEGACY COMMON STOCK BEFORE THE SPECIAL MEETING?
A:The record date for Legacy stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting is earlier than both the date of the special meeting and the completion of the Merger. If you transfer your Legacy shares of common stock after the record date but before the special meeting, you will, unless special arrangements are made, retain your right to vote at the special meeting but will transfer the right to receive the Merger consideration to the person to whom you transfer your shares.
Q:IF I AM A LEGACY STOCKHOLDER, WHO CAN HELP ANSWER MY QUESTIONS?
A:If you have any questions about the Merger or the special meeting, or if you need additional copies of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact Legacy’s proxy solicitor, Phoenix Advisory Partners, LLC, at (800) _________ for stockholders or (___) ________ for banks and brokers.
Q:WHEN AND WHERE WILL BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDERS MEET?
A:Berkshire Hills will hold a special meeting of its stockholders on __________, 2011, at ____ _.m., Eastern Time, at _______________________________________________.
Q:WHAT MATTERS ARE BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDERS BEING ASKED TO APPROVE AT THE BERKSHIRE HILLS SPECIAL MEETING IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER PURSUANT TO THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS?
A:Berkshire Hills stockholders are being asked to approve the Merger Agreement and approve the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger. We refer to this proposal as the “Berkshire Hills Bancorp Merger Agreement proposal.”

Berkshire Hills stockholders also are being asked to approve an amendment to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock we are authorized to issue from 26 million to 50 million and to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp Merger Agreement proposal or the amendment to the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation, which we refer to as the “Berkshire Hills Bancorp adjournment proposal.”

Q:WHAT DOES BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND WITH RESPECT TO THE THREE PROPOSALS?
A:Berkshire Hills Bancorp’s board of directors has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and determined that the Merger Agreement and the Merger are fair to and in the best interests of Berkshire Hills and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that Berkshire Hills stockholders vote “FOR” the Berkshire Hills Bancorp Merger Agreement proposal.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp’s board of directors also unanimously recommends that Berkshire Hills stockholders vote “FOR” the amendment to the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation and “FOR” the Berkshire Hills Bancorp adjournment proposal.

Q:DID THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BERKSHIRE HILLS RECEIVE AN OPINION FROM A FINANCIAL ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE MERGER?
A:Yes. On December 21, 2010, Sandler O’Neill & Partners, LP (“Sandler O’Neill”) rendered its written opinion to the board of directors of Berkshire Hills that, as of the date of the opinion and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the Merger consideration in the proposed Merger was fair to Berkshire Hills from a financial point of view. The full text of Sandler O’Neill’s written opinion is attached as Appendix C to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Berkshire Hills stockholders are urged to read the entire opinion carefully.

vii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Q:WHO CAN VOTE AT THE BERKSHIRE HILLS SPECIAL MEETING?
A:Holders of record of Berkshire Hills common stock at the close of business on ________, 2011, which is the record date for the Berkshire Hills special meeting, are entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Q:HOW MANY VOTES MUST BE REPRESENTED IN PERSON OR BY PROXY AT THE BERKSHIRE HILLS SPECIAL MEETING TO HAVE A QUORUM?
A:The holders of a majority of the shares of Berkshire Hills common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the special meeting.
Q:WHAT VOTE BY BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDERS IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE BERKSHIRE HILLS SPECIAL MEETING PROPOSALS?
A:Assuming a quorum is present at the Berkshire Hills special meeting, approval of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp Merger Agreement proposal and the Berkshire Hills adjournment proposal will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote on such proposals. Abstentions will have the same effect as shares voted against the proposals, and broker non-votes will not affect whether the proposals are approved. Under our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware law, the amendment of our Certificate of Incorporation requires a vote “FOR” the amendment by a majority of the outstanding Common Stock entitled to vote thereon.

As of the record date for the special meeting, directors and executive officers of Berkshire Hills, together with their affiliates, had sole or shared voting power over approximately ____% of the Berkshire Hills common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting.

Q:HOW MAY BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING PROPOSALS PRESENTED IN THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS?
A:Berkshire Hills stockholders may vote by telephone using the number on the proxy card or by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the enclosed prepaid return envelope as soon as possible. This will enable their shares to be represented and voted at the special meeting.
Q:WILL A BROKER OR BANK HOLDING SHARES IN “STREET NAME” FOR A BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDER AUTOMATICALLY VOTE THOSE SHARES FOR THE STOCKHOLDER AT THE BERKSHIRE HILLS SPECIAL MEETING?
A:No. A broker or bankWILL NOTbe able to vote your shares with respect to the Berkshire Hills Merger Agreement proposal or the amendment to the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. certificate of incorporation without first receiving instructions from you on how to vote. If your shares are held in “street name,” you will receive separate voting instructions with your proxy materials. It is therefore important that you provide timely instruction to your broker or bank to ensure that all shares of Berkshire Hills common stock that you own are voted at the special meeting.
Q:WILL BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDERS BE ABLE TO VOTE THEIR SHARES AT THE BERKSHIRE HILLS SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON?
A:Yes. Submitting a proxy will not affect the right of any Berkshire Hills stockholder to vote in person at the special meeting. If a Berkshire Hills stockholder holds shares in “street name,” the stockholder must ask its broker or bank how to vote those shares in person at the special meeting.
Q:WHAT DO BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDERS NEED TO DO NOW?
A:After carefully reading and considering the information contained in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, Berkshire Hills stockholders are requested to vote by mail or by attending the special meeting and voting in person. If you choose to vote by mail, you should complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card. The proxy card will instruct the persons named on the proxy card to vote the stockholder’s Berkshire Hills shares at the special meeting as the stockholder directs. If a stockholder signs and sends in a proxy card and does not indicate how the stockholder wishes to vote, the proxy will be voted “FOR” both of the special meeting proposals.

viii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Q:WHAT SHOULD A BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDER DO IF HE OR SHE RECEIVES MORE THAN ONE SET OF VOTING MATERIALS?
A:As a Berkshire Hills stockholder, you may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your Berkshire Hills shares in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold Berkshire Hills shares. If you are a holder of record and your Berkshire Hills shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. In addition, if you are a holder of both Legacy common stock and Berkshire Hills common stock, you will receive one or more separate proxy cards or voting instruction cards for each company. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive or otherwise follow the voting instructions set forth in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus in the sections entitled “Special Meeting of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders” and “Special Meeting of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders.”
Q:MAY A BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDER CHANGE OR REVOKE THE STOCKHOLDER’S VOTE AFTER SUBMITTING A PROXY?
A:Yes. If you have not voted through your broker, you can change your vote by:
providing written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary of Berkshire Hills, which must be filed with the Corporate Secretary by the time the special meeting begins; or
attending the special meeting and voting in person. Any earlier proxy will be revoked. However, simply attending the special meeting without voting will not revoke your proxy.

If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must follow your broker’s directions to change your vote.

Q:IF I AM A BERKSHIRE HILLS STOCKHOLDER, WHO CAN HELP ANSWER MY QUESTIONS?
A:If you have any questions about the Merger or the special meeting, or if you need additional copies of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact Berkshire Hills’s proxy solicitor, Phoenix Advisory Partners, LLC, at 1-800-________.
Q:WHERE CAN I FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT BERKSHIRE HILLS AND LEGACY?
A:You can find more information about Berkshire Hills and Legacy from the various sources described under the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” in the forepart of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

ix


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and may not contain all of the information important to you. To understand the Merger more fully, you should read this entire document carefully, including the documents attached to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

The Companies

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
(413) 443-5601

Berkshire Hills, a Delaware corporation, is a savings and loan holding company headquartered in Pittsfield, Massachusetts that was incorporated and commenced operations in 2000. Berkshire Hills’ common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BHLB.” Berkshire Hills conducts its operations primarily through Berkshire Bank, a Massachusetts chartered savings bank with 48 full-service branch offices in western Massachusetts, northeastern and central New York and southern Vermont. Berkshire Bank’s experienced banking team offers comprehensive deposit, lending and wealth management products to personal and business accounts. Berkshire Hills is also the holding company for Berkshire Insurance Group, a full service Massachusetts insurance agency providing both personal and business insurance services. At December 31, 2010, Berkshire Hills had total assets of $2.9 billion, total deposits of $2.2 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $388 million.

On April 1, 2011, Berkshire Hills completed its acquisition of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (“Rome”) and The Rome Savings Bank. The aggregate merger consideration paid to the Rome stockholders was approximately 2,597,000 shares of Berkshire Hills common stock and approximately $22.1 million cash. At December 31, 2010, Rome had total assets of $327.2 million, total deposits of $225.3 million, total stockholders’ equity of $60.7 million provided through five full-service community banking offices in Rome, Lee and New Hartford, New York, all of which opened as branches of Berkshire Bank on April 1, 2011.

Legacy Bancorp, Inc.
99 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
(413) 443-4421

Legacy, a Delaware corporation, is a one-bank holding company headquartered in Pittsfield, Massachusetts that was incorporated and commenced operations in 2005. Legacy’s common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “LEGC.” Legacy conducts its operations primarily through Legacy Banks, a Massachusetts-chartered stock savings bank offering products and services to individuals, families and business through 19 branch offices in western Massachusetts and eastern New York State. Predecessors to Legacy Banks have been serving the area’s financial needs since 1835. Legacy Banks’ business consists primarily of making loans to its customers, including residential mortgages, commercial real estate loans, commercial loans and consumer loans, and investing in a variety of investment and mortgage-backed securities. Legacy Banks funds these lending and investment activities with deposits from the general public, funds generated from operations and select borrowings. Legacy Banks also provides insurance and investment products and services, investment portfolio management, debit and credit card products and online banking. Its primary business includes residential and commercial real estate lending, small business loan and deposit services as well as variety of consumer loan and deposit services. At December 31, 2010, Legacy had total assets of $916.9 million, total deposits of $685.2 million and total stockholders’ equity of $111.6 million.

Special Meeting of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders; Required Vote (page 30)

A special meeting of Legacy stockholders is scheduled to be held at _____________________, Pittsfield, Massachusetts at ____ p.m., local time, on [Date]. At the special meeting, you will be asked to vote on a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement between Legacy and Berkshire Hills. You may also be asked to vote to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve the Merger Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Only Legacy stockholders of record as of the close of business on [Record Date] are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Legacy special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

Approval of the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Legacy common stock entitled to vote. As of the record date, there were _________ shares of Legacy common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. The directors and executive officers of Legacy, as a group, beneficially owned _______ shares of Legacy common stock, representing ____% of the outstanding shares of Legacy common stock as of the record date and have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the Merger at the special meeting.

Special Meeting of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders; Required Vote (page 32)

A special meeting of Berkshire Hills stockholders is scheduled to be held at _____________________, Pittsfield, Massachusetts at ____ p.m., local time, on [Date]. At the special meeting, you will be asked to vote on a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement between Legacy and Berkshire Hills, and an amendment to the Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 26 million to 50 million. You may also be asked to vote to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve the Merger Agreement or the amendment to the Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation.

Only Berkshire Hills stockholders of record as of the close of business on [Record Date] are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Berkshire Hills special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

Approval of the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock entitled to vote. Under the Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware law, the amendment of Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation requires a vote “FOR” the amendment by a majority of the outstanding Common Stock entitled to vote thereof. As of the record date, there were _________ shares of Berkshire Hills common stock outstanding. The directors and executive officers of Berkshire Hills, as a group, beneficially owned _______ shares of Berkshire Hills common stock, representing ____% of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock as of the record date.

The Merger and the Merger Agreement (page 38)

Berkshire Hills’ acquisition of Legacy is governed by the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement provides that, if all of the conditions are satisfied or waived, Legacy will be merged with and into Berkshire Hills with Berkshire Hills as the surviving entity.We encourage you to read the Merger Agreement, which is included as Appendix A to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

What Legacy Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders Will Receive in the Merger (page 66)

Under the Merger Agreement, each share of Legacy common stock will be exchanged for 0.56385 shares of Berkshire Hills common stock and $1.30 in cash. If Berkshire Hills and Legacy must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a requirement contained in any regulatory approval, and if the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits exceeds 350 basis points, then Berkshire Hills will be required under the Merger Agreement to make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders that, in the aggregate, will equal 50% of the premium in excess of 350 basis points (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium). Such payment would occur following completion of any such divestiture, which is anticipated to occur after completion of the Merger.

Comparative Market Prices (page 66)

The following table shows the closing price per share of Berkshire Hills common stock and the equivalent price per share of Legacy common stock, giving effect to the Merger, on December 21, 2010, which is the last day on which shares of Berkshire Hills common stock traded preceding the public announcement of the proposed Merger, and on [Record Date], the most recent practicable date prior to the mailing of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The equivalent price per share of Legacy common stock was


TABLE OF CONTENTS

computed by multiplying the price of a share of Berkshire Hills common stock by the 0.56385 exchange ratio. The equivalent price per share of Legacy common stock does not include the $1.30 cash portion of the Merger Consideration. See “Description of the Merger — Consideration to be Received in the Merger” on page 66.

Berkshire Hills
Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock
Equivalent Price
Per Share of Legacy
Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock
December 21, 2010$$
[Record Date]$$

Recommendation of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors (page 47)

The Legacy board of directors has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the proposed merger. The Legacy board believes that the Merger Agreement, including the Merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, is fair to, and in the best interests of, Legacy and its stockholders, and thereforeunanimously recommends that Legacy stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. In its reaching this decision, Legacy’s board of directors considered a variety of factors, which are described in the section captioned “Description of the Merger — Recommendation of the Legacy Board of Directors; Legacy’s Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 47.

The Legacy board of directors unanimously recommends that Legacy stockholders vote“FOR” the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the Merger Agreement.

Opinion of Legacy Bancorp, Inc.’s Financial Advisor (page 50)

In deciding to approve the Merger, one of the factors considered by Legacy’s board of directors was the opinion of KBW, which served as financial advisor to Legacy’s board of directors. KBW delivered its oral opinion on December 21, 2010, which was confirmed in writing on December 21, 2010, that the Merger consideration is fair to the holders of Legacy common stock from a financial point of view. The full text of this opinion is included as Appendix B to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. You should read the opinion carefully to understand the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of the review conducted by KBW. Legacy has agreed to pay KBW a fee equal to 1.25 percent of the aggregate purchase price contingent upon completion of the Merger for its services in connection with the Merger. KBW has received a fee of $200,000 for the rendering of its fairness opinion, which fee shall be credited against the 1.25 percent fee referenced above if the Merger is completed.

Recommendation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors (page 57)

The Berkshire Hills board of directors has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the proposed merger. The Berkshire Hills board believes that the Merger Agreement, including the Merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, is fair to, and in the best interests of, Berkshire Hills and its stockholders, and thereforeunanimously recommends that Berkshire Hillsstockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. In its reaching this decision, Berkshire Hill’s board of directors considered a variety of factors, which are described in the section captioned “Description of the Merger — Recommendation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 57.

The Berkshire Hills board of directors has unanimously approved the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to increase the amount of authorized common stock from 26 million to 50 million. The Berkshire Hills board believes that the proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation is in the best interests of Berkshire Hills and its stockholders, and thereforeunanimously recommends that Berkshire Hills stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to amend a Certificate of Incorporation.

The Berkshire Hills board of directors unanimously recommends that Berkshire Hills stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the Merger Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Opinion of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s Financial Advisor (page 58)

In deciding to approve the Merger, one of the factors considered by Berkshire Hills’ board of directors was the opinion of Sandler O’Neill, which served as financial advisor to Berkshire Hills’ board of directors. Sandler O’Neill delivered its oral opinion on December 20, 2010, which was confirmed in writing on December 21, 2010, that the Merger consideration is fair to the holders of Berkshire Hills common stock from a financial point of view. The full text of this opinion is included as Appendix C to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. You should read the opinion carefully to understand the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of the review conducted by Sandler O’Neill. Berkshire Hills has agreed to pay Sandler O’Neill a transaction fee of $810,000, of which $162,000 was paid upon the signing of the Merger Agreement and the remainder to be paid upon completion of the Merger. Sandler O’Neill also received a fee of $150,000 for the rendering of its fairness opinion.

Regulatory Matters Relating to the Merger (page 71)

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Merger cannot be completed unless it is first approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Massachusetts Division of Banks, the Massachusetts Board of Bank Incorporation and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Berkshire Hills has filed the required applications. As of the date of this document, Berkshire Hills has not received any approvals from those regulators. While Berkshire Hills does not know of any reason why it would not be able to obtain approval in a timely manner, Berkshire Hills cannot be certain when or if it will receive regulatory approval. As part of its regulatory filings, Berkshire Hills has requested the bank regulators and the United States Department of Justice to authorize Berkshire Hills and Legacy to divest approximately $162.0 million in deposits as well as four Legacy branch offices located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. There can be no assurance as to whether the bank regulators or the United States Department of Justice will accept, deny or modify the proposed divestiture plan.

Conditions to Completing the Merger (page 78)

The completion of the Merger is subject to the fulfillment of a number of conditions, including:

approval of the Merger Agreement at the special meeting(s) of Berkshire Hills and Legacy by at least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote;
approval of the transaction by the appropriate regulatory authorities;
receipt by each party of opinions from their respective legal counsel to the effect that the Merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code;
the continued accuracy of representations and warranties made on the date of the Merger Agreement; and
no material adverse effect on either party has occurred.

Terminating the Merger Agreement (page 84)

The Merger Agreement may be terminated by mutual consent of Berkshire Hills and Legacy at any time prior to the completion of the Merger. Additionally, subject to conditions and circumstances described in the Merger Agreement, either Berkshire Hills or Legacy may terminate the Merger Agreement if, among other things, any of the following occur:

the Merger has not been consummated by November 30, 2011;
Legacy stockholders do not approve the Merger Agreement at the Legacy special meeting;
Berkshire Hills stockholders do not approve the Merger Agreement at the Berkshire Hills special meeting;
a required regulatory approval is denied or a governmental authority blocks the Merger; or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

there is a breach by the other party of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement contained in the Merger Agreement, which cannot be cured, or has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of written notice to such party of such breach.

Legacy also may terminate the Merger Agreement if Berkshire Hills’ stock price falls below thresholds set forth in the Merger Agreement and Berkshire Hills does not increase the exchange ratio pursuant to a prescribed formula.

Berkshire Hills may also terminate the Merger Agreement if Legacy materially breaches its agreements regarding the solicitation of other acquisition proposals and the submission of the Merger Agreement to stockholders or if the board of directors of Legacy does not recommend approval of the Merger in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or withdraws or revises its recommendation in a manner adverse to Berkshire Hills.

Termination Fee (page 85)

Under certain circumstances described in the Merger Agreement, Berkshire Hills may demand from Legacy Bancorp, Inc. a $4,320,000 termination fee in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement. See “Description of the Merger — Termination Fee” on page 85 for a list of the circumstances under which a termination fee is payable.

Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger that are Different from Yours (page 73)

In considering the recommendation of the board of directors of Legacy to adopt the Merger Agreement, you should be aware that officers and directors of Legacy have employment and other compensation agreements or plans that give them interests in the Merger that are somewhat different from, or in addition to, their interests as Legacy stockholders. These interests and agreements, which provide for cash payments in the aggregate amount of approximately $___ million, include:

Employment agreements for J. Williar Dunlaevy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Legacy, and Patrick J. Sullivan, President of Legacy and President and Chief Executive Officer of Legacy Banks, that provide for severance payments in connection with a termination of employment by the employer without cause or by the employee for good reason following a change in control, each of which will be terminated in connection with the Merger in exchange for the payment of cash and benefits pursuant to individual settlement agreements that Berkshire Hills and Legacy have entered into with Messrs. J.W. Dunlaevy and P. Sullivan;
Change in control agreements with our other named executive officers, Ms. Kimberly Mathews, Messrs. Paul Bruce and Richard Sullivan, and five other officers of Legacy Banks, that provide for severance payments in connection with a termination of employment by the employer without cause or by the employee for good reason following a change in control;
Interests under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for J. Williar Dunlaevy and a Director Fee Continuation Plan, each of which will be terminated in connection with the change in control, with the benefits paid to the participants in a lump sum;
An offer letter to Patrick J. Sullivan pursuant to which the executive agreed to serve Berkshire Hills as Executive Vice President of Corporate Banking and Wealth Management in exchange for a sign-on bonus, grants of restricted stock and other benefits;
A three-year change in control agreement and a severance agreement that Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Bank have entered into with Patrick J. Sullivan;
A non-competition and consulting agreement that Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Bank have entered into with J. Williar Dunlaevy;
The Legacy 2006 Equity Incentive Plan shall remain effective and shall be maintained by Berkshire Hills; however, (i) all stock options granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan will cease to represent an option to purchase Legacy common stock and will be converted automatically into an option to purchase Berkshire Hills common stock equal to the product (rounded down to the nearest whole share) of (A) the number of shares of Legacy common stock subject to such Legacy stock

TABLE OF CONTENTS

option, and (B) 0.6265, at an exercise price per share (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal to (1) the exercise price of such Legacy stock option divided by (2) 0.6265, (ii) notwithstanding the foregoing, all stock options granted on November 29, 2006 with an exercise price of $16.03 will be cancelled and the holder thereof will receive $3.00 for each cancelled stock option, and (iii) notwithstanding the foregoing, all stock options held by J. Williar Dunlaevy shall be converted automatically into stock options to purchase Berkshire Hills common stock as provided in this paragraph and such options shall not be entitled to any cash payment;
J. Williar Dunlaevy and one other person who is a director of Legacy, as determined by Berkshire Hills, shall be appointed and elected to the Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Banks board of directors;
The acceleration of vesting of outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards; and
Rights of Legacy officers and directors to continued indemnification coverage and continued coverage under directors and officers’ liability insurance policies.

Accounting Treatment of the Merger (page 68)

The Merger will be accounted for using the acquisition method in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Comparison of Rights of Stockholders (page 89)

When the Merger is completed, Legacy stockholders who are to receive shares of Berkshire Hills will become Berkshire Hills stockholders and their rights will be governed by Delaware law and by Berkshire Hills’ certificate of incorporation and bylaws. See “Comparison of Rights of Stockholders” beginning on page 89 for a summary of the material differences between the respective rights of Legacy and Berkshire Hills stockholders.

Rights of Dissenting Stockholders (page 34)

Legacy stockholders have dissenters’ rights and may receive payment in cash of the fair value of their shares, excluding any appreciation in value that results from the merger. To maintain its dissenters’ rights a stockholder must (1) deliver written notice of its intent to demand payment for its shares to Legacy Bancorp, Inc. before the special meeting of Legacy stockholders or at the special meeting but before the vote is taken and (2) either vote against the merger or not submit a proxy. See “Rights of Dissenting Stockholders” on page 34.

Legacy stockholders may dissent from the Merger and, upon complying with the requirements of Delaware law, receive cash in the amount of the fair value of their shares instead of shares of Berkshire Hills common stock and/or the cash consideration specified in the Merger Agreement. A copy of the section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertaining to dissenters’ rights is attached as Appendix D to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.You should read the statute carefully and consult with your legal counsel if you intend to exercise these rights.

Material Tax Consequences of the Merger (page 68)

Provided that the merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes, since Legacy stockholders will receive a combination of Berkshire Hills common stock and cash, Legacy stockholders may recognize gain, but not any loss, on the exchange of their stock for Berkshire Hills common stock and cash. For a more detailed discussion of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the transaction, including the tax consequences of the aggregate divestiture premium (described on pages 68 and 70) that may be paid to Legacy stockholders as additional cash consideration for such stockholders’ shares of Legacy common stock, please see the section “Description of the Merger — Material Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 68.

This tax treatment may not apply to all Legacy stockholders. Determining the actual tax consequences of the Merger to Legacy stockholders can be complicated. Legacy stockholders should consult their own tax advisor for a full understanding of the Merger’s tax consequences that are particular to each stockholder.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, you should consider carefully the risk factors described below, in deciding how to vote. You should keep these risk factors in mind when you read forward-looking statements in this document. Please refer to the section of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus titled “Caution About Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 11.

The price of Berkshire Hills common stock will fluctuate, and therefore Legacy stockholders will not know until the effective time of the Merger the value of the consideration they will receive in the Merger.

Because the per share stock consideration is fixed at 0.56385 shares of Berkshire Hills common stock, the market value of the Berkshire Hills common stock to be issued in the Merger will depend upon the market price of Berkshire Hills common stock. This market price likely will vary from the closing price of Berkshire Hills common stock on the date the Merger was announced, on the date that this proxy statement/prospectus was mailed, and on the date of the Berkshire Hills or Legacy special meeting. Accordingly, at the time of the Legacy special meeting, Legacy stockholders will not necessarily know or be able to calculate the value of the stock consideration they would be entitled to receive upon completion of the Merger. You should obtain current market quotations for shares of Berkshire Hills common stock and for shares of Legacy common stock.

The price of Berkshire Hills common stock might decrease after the Merger.

Following the Merger, holders of Legacy common stock will become stockholders of Berkshire Hills. Berkshire Hills common stock could decline in value after the Merger. For example, during the twelve-month period ending on [Record Date] (the most recent practicable date before the printing of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus), the price of Berkshire Hills common stock varied from a low of $_____ to a high of $_____ and ended that period at $_____. The market value of Berkshire Hills common stock fluctuates based upon general market conditions, Berkshire Hills’ business and prospects and other factors. Further, the market price of Berkshire Hills common stock after the merger may be affected by factors different from those affecting the common stock of Berkshire Hills or Legacy currently. The businesses of Legacy and Berkshire Hills differ and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of the combined company’s shares of common stock may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations and market prices of common stock of each of Legacy and Berkshire Hills. For a discussion of the businesses of Legacy and Berkshire Hills and of certain factors to consider in connection with those businesses, see the documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus and referred to under “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 96.

Berkshire Hills may be unsuccessful in pursuing a plan to divest certain deposits and other liabilities. Such proposed divestiture plan may constitute a material adverse effect on the parties.

Berkshire Hills and Legacy are both headquartered in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and, as a result, each bank has a significant number of branches and deposit market share in and around their headquarters and the surrounding area. Berkshire Hills and Legacy have among the largest deposit market shares in the Pittsfield market area. As part of its regulatory filings, Berkshire Hills has requested the bank regulators and the United States Department of Justice to authorize Berkshire Hills and Legacy to divest approximately $162.0 million in deposits, as well as four Legacy branch offices located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. There can be no assurance as to whether the bank regulators or the United States Department of Justice will accept, deny or modify the proposed divestiture plan, or the timing of such approvals.

In addition, any regulatory approval that includes a requirement that the parties divest more than $200.0 million of deposit liabilities, whether from Legacy, Berkshire Hills or a combination of the two, together with related branch premises and loans, may be considered a material adverse effect as defined in the Merger Agreement, and therefore be cause to terminate the Merger Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

There can be no assurance that any amount will be paid to Legacy stockholders in respect of divested deposit liabilities.

If Berkshire Hills and Legacy must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a requirement contained in any regulatory approval, and if the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits exceeds 350 basis points, then Berkshire Hills will be required under the Merger Agreement to make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders that, in the aggregate, will equal 50% of the premium in excess of 350 basis points (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium). The right to such payment is not transferable. Such payment would occur following completion of any such divestiture, which is anticipated to occur after completion of the Merger. However, there can be no assurance that Berkshire Hills will be required to divest deposit liabilities. Additionally, in the event Berkshire Hills is required to do so, there can be no assurance that the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits will exceed 350 basis points and the Legacy stockholders will receive any payment with respect to such divested deposit liabilities.

Berkshire Hills may be unable to successfully integrate Legacy’s operations and retain Legacy’s employees.

The Merger involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated independently. The difficulties of combining the operations of the two companies include:

integrating personnel with diverse business backgrounds;
combining different corporate cultures; and
retaining key employees.

The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of the business and the loss of key personnel. The integration of the two companies will require the experience and expertise of certain key employees of Legacy who are expected to be retained by Berkshire Hills. Berkshire Hills may not be successful in retaining these employees for the time period necessary to successfully integrate Legacy’s operations with those of Berkshire Hills. The diversion of management’s attention and any delay or difficulty encountered in connection with the Merger and the integration of the two companies’ operations could have an adverse effect on the business and results of operation of Berkshire Hills following the Merger.

The termination fee and the restrictions on solicitation contained in the Merger Agreement may discourage other companies from trying to acquire Legacy

Until the completion of the Merger, with some exceptions, Legacy is prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or participating in any discussion of or otherwise considering any inquiry or proposal that may lead to an acquisition proposal, such as a merger or other business combination transaction, with any person other than Berkshire Hills. In addition, Legacy has agreed to pay a termination fee to Berkshire Hills in specified circumstances. These provisions could discourage other companies from trying to acquire Legacy even though those other companies might be willing to offer greater value to Legacy’s stockholders than Berkshire Hills has offered in the Merger. The payment of the termination fee could also have a material adverse effect on Legacy’s financial condition. Legacy was afforded the opportunity to solicit additional acquisition proposals from third parties from the date of the Merger Agreement until January 31, 2011, which resulted in no other offers being made to Legacy.

Certain of Legacy’s officers and directors have interests that are different from, or in addition to, interests of Legacy stockholders generally.

You should be aware that the directors and officers of Legacy have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of Legacy stockholders generally. These include: two current Legacy board members joining the Berkshire Hills board of directors upon completion of the Merger; severance payments that certain officers will receive under existing employment or change-in-control agreements, the offer of executive-level employment that the President of Legacy will become subject to upon completion of the Merger; a non-competition and consulting agreement entered into with the Chief Executive Officer of Legacy; the payment for stock options; and provisions in the Merger Agreement relating to


TABLE OF CONTENTS

indemnification of directors and officers and insurance for directors and officers of Legacy for events occurring before the Merger. For a more detailed discussion of these interests, see “Description of the Merger — Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger that are Different from Yours” beginning on page 73.

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact the stock prices and future businesses and financial results of Berkshire Hills and Legacy

If the Merger is not completed, the ongoing businesses of Berkshire Hills and Legacy may be adversely affected and Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be subject to several risks, including the following:

Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be required to pay certain costs relating to the Merger, whether or not the Merger is completed, such as legal, accounting, financial advisor and printing fees;
under the Merger Agreement, Legacy is subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing the Merger, which may adversely affect its ability to execute certain of its business strategies; and
matters relating to the Merger may require substantial commitments of time and resources by Berkshire Hills and Legacy management, which could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to Berkshire Hills and Legacy as independent companies, as the case may be.

In addition, if the Merger is not completed, Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from their respective customers and employees. This risk may be particularly significant since the parties share the same primary market area. Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy also could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger or to enforcement proceedings commenced against Berkshire Hills or Legacy to perform their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement. If the Merger is not completed, Berkshire Hills and Legacy cannot assure their stockholders that the risks described above will not materialize and will not materially affect the business, financial results and stock prices of Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy.

Legacy stockholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the Merger and will exercise less influence over management of the combined organization.

Legacy stockholders currently have the right to vote in the election of the Legacy Board of Directors and on various other matters affecting Legacy. Upon the completion of the Merger, each Legacy stockholder will become a stockholder of Berkshire Hills with a percentage ownership of the combined organization that is much smaller than the stockholder’s percentage ownership of Legacy. It is expected that the former stockholders of Legacy as a group will receive shares in the merger constituting approximately [__]% of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock immediately after the Merger. As a result, Legacy stockholders will have significantly less influence on the management and policies of Berkshire Hills than they now have on the management and policies of Legacy.

The shares of Berkshire Hills common stock to be received by Legacy stockholders receiving the stock consideration as a result of the Merger will have different rights from shares of Legacy common stock.

Following completion of the Merger, Legacy stockholders who receive the stock consideration will no longer be stockholders of Legacy but will instead be stockholders of Berkshire Hills. Although Legacy and Berkshire Hills each are incorporated under Delaware law, there will be important differences between the current rights of Legacy stockholders and the rights of Berkshire Hills stockholders that may be important to Legacy stockholders. See “Comparison of Rights of Stockholders” beginning on page 89 for a discussion of the different rights associated with Berkshire Hills common stock and Legacy common stock.

The fairness opinion obtained by Legacy from its financial advisor does not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion

KBW, Legacy’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, has delivered to the board of directors of Legacy its opinion dated as of December 21, 2010. The opinion of KBW stated that as of such date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Merger consideration to be paid to the holders of the outstanding shares of Legacy common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair


TABLE OF CONTENTS

from a financial point of view to such holders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Berkshire Hills or Legacy, changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or changes in other factors on which the opinion is based, may materially alter or affect the relative values of Berkshire Hills and Legacy.

The fairness opinion obtained by Berkshire Hills from its financial advisor does not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion

Sandler O’Neill, Berkshire Hills’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, has delivered to the board of directors of Berkshire Hills its opinion dated as of December 21, 2010. The opinion of Sandler O’Neill stated that as of such date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Merger consideration to be paid to the holders of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Legacy or Berkshire Hills, changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or changes in other factors on which the opinion is based, may materially alter or affect the relative values of Legacy and Berkshire Hills.

There is no assurance when or even if the Merger will be completed.

Completion of the Merger is subject to satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. See “Description of the Merger — Conditions to Completing the Merger” on page 78. There can be no assurance that Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be able to satisfy the closing conditions or that closing conditions beyond their control will be satisfied or waived.

Berkshire Hills and Legacy can agree at any time to terminate the Merger Agreement, even if Legacy stockholders and Berkshire Hills stockholders have already voted to approve the merger agreement. Berkshire Hills and Legacy can also terminate the Merger Agreement under other specified circumstances.

The Merger is subject to the receipt of consents and approvals from regulatory authorities that may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on Berkshire Hills or, if not obtained, could prevent completion of the Merger.

Before the Merger may be completed, various approvals and consents must be obtained from regulatory entities. These regulators may impose conditions on the completion of the Merger or require changes to the terms of the Merger. Any such conditions or changes could have the effect of delaying completion of the Merger or imposing additional costs on or limiting the revenues of Berkshire Hills following the Merger. In addition, pending elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision and transfer of its responsibilities to other federal banking agencies may adversely affect the timely processing of the applications.

Either Berkshire Hills or Legacy may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not been completed by November 30, 2011, unless the failure of the merger to be completed has resulted from the failure of the party seeking to terminate the merger agreement to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement.

Any failure to successfully integrate the businesses of Rome and Legacy or otherwise realize the expected benefits from Berkshire Hills’ recent mergers could adversely affect Berkshire Hills’ results of operations or financial condition.

There are significant risks and uncertainties associated with mergers and acquisitions. The success of Berkshire Hills’ mergers with Rome and Legacy will depend, in part, on Berkshire Hills’ ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from combining the businesses of Berkshire Hills with Rome and Legacy. If Berkshire Hills is are not able to successfully integrate these businesses, the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the acquisitions may not be realized fully or may take longer to realize than expected. For example, Berkshire Hills may fail to realize the growth opportunities and cost savings anticipated to be derived from the acquisition. In addition, as with regard to any of acquisition, a significant decline in asset valuations or cash flows may also cause Berkshire Hills not to realize expected benefits.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

To the extent that the purchase price, consisting of cash plus the number of shares of Berkshire Hills common stock issued or to be issued in the Rome and Legacy mergers, exceeds the fair value of the net assets, including identifiable intangibles of Rome and Legacy, at the respective merger dates, that amount will be reported as goodwill. In accordance with current accounting guidance, goodwill will not be amortized but will be evaluated for impairment annually. A failure to realize expected benefits of the Rome or Legacy merger could adversely impacting the carrying value of the goodwill recognized in those mergers, and in turn negatively affect Berkshire Hills’ financial condition.

CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this document that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (referred to as the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (referred to as the Securities Exchange Act), and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The sections of this document which contain forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, “Questions And Answers About the Merger and the Special Meeting,” “ Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Description of the Merger — Background of the Merger,” “Description of the Merger — Legacy’s 2011 Management Financial Projections,” and “Description of the Merger — Recommendation of the Legacy Board of Directors; Legacy’s Reasons for the Merger.” You can identify these statements from the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “target” and similar expressions.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including among other things, changes in general economic and business conditions and the risks and other factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 7.

Additional factors that could cause the results of Berkshire Hills or Legacy to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in the filings made by Berkshire Hill and Legacy with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Berkshire Hills Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and the Legacy Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Because of these and other uncertainties, Berkshire Hills’ actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, Berkshire Hills’ and Legacy’s past results of operations do not necessarily indicate Berkshire Hills’ and Legacy’s combined future results. You should not place undue reliance on any of the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. Neither Berkshire Hills nor Legacy is undertaking an obligation to update these forward-looking statements, even though its situation may change in the future, except as required under federal securities law. Each of Berkshire Hills and Legacy qualifies all of its forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following tables show summarized historical financial data for Berkshire Hills and Legacy. You should read this summary financial information in connection with Berkshire Hills’ historical financial information, which is incorporated by reference into this document, and in connection with Legacy’s historical financial information, which is incorporated by reference into this document.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.

     
 At December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Financial Data:
                         
Total assets $2,880,716  $2,700,424  $2,666,729  $2,513,432  $2,149,642 
Loans(1)  2,142,162   1,961,658   2,007,152   1,944,016   1,698,987 
Allowance for loan losses  (31,898  (31,816  (22,908  (22,116  (19,370
Securities  405,953   420,966   341,516   258,497   234,174 
Goodwill and other intangible assets  173,079   176,100   178,830   182,452   121,341 
Total deposits  2,204,441   1,986,762   1,829,580   1,822,563   1,521,938 
Borrowings and subordinated debentures  260,301   306,668   374,621   349,938   360,469 
Total stockholders’ equity  387,960   384,581   408,425   326,837   258,161 
Non-performing loans  13,712   38,700   12,171   10,508   7,592 

     
 For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Data:
                         
Total interest and dividend income $112,277  $115,476  $133,211  $131,944  $118,051 
Total interest expense  35,330   45,880   57,471   68,019   57,811 
Net interest income  76,947   69,596   75,740   63,925   60,240 
Service charges and fee income  29,859   28,181   30,334   26,654   13,539 
All other non-interest income (loss)  1,300   808   1,261   (2,011  (1,491
Total non-interest income  31,159   28,989   31,595   24,643   12,048 
Total net revenue  108,106   98,585   107,335   88,568   72,288 
Provision for loan losses  8,526   47,730   4,580   4,300   7,860 
Total non-interest expense  81,729   78,571   71,699   65,494   48,868 
Income tax expense (benefit) – continuing operations  4,113   (11,649  8,812   5,239   4,668 
Net income from discontinued operations              371 
Net income (loss)  13,738   (16,067  22,244   13,535   11,263 
Less: Cumulative preferred stock dividends and accretion     1,030          
Less: Deemed dividend from preferred stock repayment     2,954          
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $13,738  $(20,051 $22,244  $13,535  $11,263 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Ratios and Other Data:
                         
Performance Ratios:
                         
Return (loss) on average assets(2)  0.50  (0.60)%   0.87  0.60  0.53
Return (loss) on average equity(3)  3.54   (3.90  6.47   4.69   4.40 
Net interest rate spread (tax equivalent)(4)  3.00   2.61   3.06   2.79   2.81 
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(5)  3.27   3.00   3.44   3.26   3.24 
Non-interest income/total net revenue  28.82   29.41   29.44   27.82   16.67 
Non-interest expense/average assets  2.97   2.93   2.81   2.90   2.31 
Efficiency ratio(6)  70.59   73.39   64.40   62.94   58.46 
Capital Ratios:
                         
Average equity/average assets  14.11   15.36   13.49   12.73   12.08 
Equity/total assets  13.47   14.24   15.32   13.00   12.01 
Tier 1 capital to average assets – Berkshire Bank  8.02   7.86   9.34   7.97   7.69 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets – Berkshire Bank  10.58   10.71   12.28   10.40   10.27 
Asset Quality Ratios:
                         
Nonperforming assets/total assets  0.59   1.43   0.48   0.45   0.35 
Nonperforming loans/total loans  0.64   1.97   0.61   0.54   0.45 
Net loans charged-off/average total loans  0.42   1.96   0.19   0.34   0.07 
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans  233   82   188   210   255 
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans  1.49   1.62   1.14   1.14   1.14 
Share Data:
                         
Basic earnings per common share $0.99  $(1.52 $2.08  $1.47  $1.32 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.99   (1.52  2.06   1.44   1.29 
Dividends per common share  0.64   0.64   0.63   0.58   0.56 
Book value per share  27.56   27.64   30.33   31.15   29.63 
Market price at year end  22.11   20.68   30.86   26.00   33.46 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic  13,862   13,189   10,700   9,223   8,538 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted  13,896   13,189   10,791   9,370   8,730 

Note: All performance ratios are based on average balance sheet amounts where applicable.

(1)Loans do not include loans held for sale, which are not material.
(2)Net income (loss) divided by average total assets.
(3)Net income (loss) divided by average total equity.
(4)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets for the year.
(6)Efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total tangible core non-interest expense by the sum of total net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis and total core non-interest income. Berkshire Hills uses this non-GAAP measure, which is used widely in the banking industry, to provide important information regarding its operational efficiency.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF LEGACY BANCORP, INC.

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Financial Data:
                         
Total assets $916,877  $946,265  $944,657  $924,541  $808,318 
Loans, net(1)  610,941   653,334   695,264   654,024   578,802 
Securities and other investments:  202,331   184,716   152,639   152,054   176,132 
Deposits  685,245   651,378   608,088   610,447   518,248 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances  105,388   160,352   197,898   167,382   127,438 
Repurchase agreements  5,329   6,386   5,238   4,055   5,575 
Total stockholders' equity  111,559   121,367   124,142   133,092   149,997 
Nonperforming loans  12,744   19,578   7,549   1,532   879 
Selected Operating Data:
                         
Total interest and dividend income $40,964  $45,818  $50,327  $49,357  $43,915 
Total interest expense  14,558   18,348   22,465   25,511   20,339 
Net interest income  26,406   27,470   27,862   23,846   23,576 
Provision for loan losses  10,468   4,883   1,465   1,051   233 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  15,938   22,587   26,397   22,795   23,343 
Non-interest income:
                         
Service charges and fees  5,108   4,006   4,541   4,496   4,044 
Gain (loss) on sales or impairment of securities, net  (1,846  (10,267  (3,194  510   (1,736
Gain on sale of loans  607   860   255   270   210 
FHLB prepayment restructuring charge  (1,481            
Gain on curtailment and termination of defined benefit plan              605 
Other  805   788   805   610   329 
Total non-interest income (loss)  3,193   (4,613  2,407   5,886   3,452 
Total non-interest expense  31,043   28,832   26,584   27,187   21,336 
Income (loss) before income taxes  (11,912  (10,858  2,220   1,494   5,459 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $(4,016 $(3,060 $776  $249  $2,653 
Net income (loss)  (7,896  (7,798  1,444   1,245   2,806 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Ratios and Other Data:
                         
Performance Ratios:
                         
Return (loss) on average assets(2)  (0.84)%   (0.82)%   0.16  0.15  0.36
Return (loss) on average equity(3)  (6.48  (6.20  1.11   0.88   1.92 
Net interest rate spread(4)  2.79   2.78   2.80   2.26   2.39 
Net interest margin(5)  3.05   3.13   3.27   3.01   3.15 
Efficiency ratio(6)  96.10   84.9   77.5   93.0   74.2 
Non-interest expense to average assets  3.29   3.04   2.89   3.23   2.70 
Dividend payout ratio  n/a   n/a   111.61   113.82   40.88 
Capital Ratios:
                         
Equity to total assets(7)  12.2  12.8  13.1  14.4  18.6
Average equity to average assets(7)
  12.9   13.3   14.1   16.9   18.5 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets – Bank  12.0   12.3   13.0   13.9   18.9 
Asset Quality Ratios:
                         
Nonperforming assets/total assets  1.63  2.20  0.80  0.17  0.11
Nonperforming loans/total loans  2.07   2.96   1.08   0.23   0.15 
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans  70.70   56.64   87.99   363.45   532.08 
Allowance for loan losses/total loans  1.47   1.67   0.95   0.85   0.80 
Share Data:
                         
Earnings (loss per share) $(0.99 $(0.98 $0.18  $0.14  $0.29 
Dividends per share $0.20  $0.20  $0.20  $0.16  $0.12 
Book value per share – end of year $12.92  $13.89  $14.14  $14.40  $14.55 
Market price at year end  13.14   9.86   10.68   13.26   15.85 

(1)Includes loans held for sale.
(2)Net income (loss) divided by average total assets.
(3)Net income (loss) divided by average total equity.
(4)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets for the year.
(6)The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense for the year less expenses related to the amortization of intangibles divided by the sum of net interest income (before loan loss provision) plus non-interest income (excluding net gains or losses on the sale or impairment of securities).
(7)Ratios are as of the end of the year.

n/a = Not Applicable


TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ROME AND LEGACY MERGERS

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information has been prepared using the acquisition method of accounting, giving effect to the merger of Berkshire Hills with Rome and the proposed merger with Legacy. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated statement of financial condition combines the historical financial information of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy as of December 31, 2010 and assumes that the mergers were completed on that date. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated statements of operations combine the historical financial information of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy and give effect to the mergers as if they had been completed as of January 1, 2010. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or financial condition had the mergers been completed on the dates described above, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results of operations in future periods or the future financial position of the combined entities. The financial information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Consolidated Financial Information. Certain reclassifications have been made to Rome's and Legacy’s historical financial information in order to conform to Berkshire Hills' presentation of financial information.

The actual value of Berkshire Hills common stock to be recorded as consideration in these mergers will be based on the closing price of Berkshire Hills common stock at the time of the merger completion dates. The merger with Rome was completed prior to the start of business on April 1, 2011; the closing price of Berkshire Hills’ stock on March 31, 2011 was $20.83, and that price was used to value Berkshire Hills’ stock. The proposed merger with Legacy is targeted for completion in the third quarter of 2011. There can be no assurance that the Legacy merger will be completed as anticipated. For purposes of the pro forma financial information, the fair value of Berkshire Hills common stock to be issued in connection with the Legacy merger was based on the $20.75 average closing price of the stock for the ten day period ending December 15, 2010, which was shortly prior to the date of the execution of the Agreement and Plan of Merger on December 21, 2010.

The pro forma financial information includes estimated adjustments, including adjustments to record assets and liabilities of Rome and Legacy at their respective fair values and represents the pro forma estimates by Berkshire Hills based on available fair value information as of the dates of the respective Agreements and Plans of Merger. In some cases, where noted, more recent information has been used to support estimated adjustments in the pro forma financial information.

The pro forma adjustments included herein are subject to change depending on changes in interest rates and the components of assets and liabilities and as additional information becomes available and additional analyses are performed. The final allocation of the purchase price for each merger will be determined after each merger is completed and after completion of thorough analyses to determine the fair value of Rome’s and Legacy’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities as of the dates the mergers are completed. Increases or decreases in the estimated fair values of the net assets as compared with the information shown in the unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information may change the amount of the purchase price allocated to goodwill and other assets and liabilities and may impact Berkshire Hills’ statement of operations due to adjustments in yield and/or amortization of the adjusted assets or liabilities. Any changes to Rome’s or Legacy’s stockholders’ equity, including results of operations from December 31, 2010 through the dates the mergers are completed, will also change the purchase price allocation, which may include the recording of a lower or higher amount of goodwill. The final adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments presented herein.

Berkshire Hills anticipates that the mergers with Rome and Legacy will provide the combined company with financial benefits that include reduced operating expenses. Berkshire Hills expects to realize cost savings approximating 35% of the anticipated non-interest expense of Rome and approximating 42% of the anticipated non-interest expense of Legacy These cost savings are not included in these pro forma statements and there can be no assurance that expected cost savings will be realized. The pro forma information, while helpful in illustrating the financial characteristics of the combined company under one set of assumptions, does not reflect the benefits of expected cost savings or opportunities to earn additional revenue and, accordingly, does


TABLE OF CONTENTS

not attempt to predict or suggest future results. It also does not necessarily reflect what the historical results of the combined company would have been had our companies been combined during these periods.

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy, which are incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference. See “Where You Can Find More InformationRights of Dissenting Stockholders” on page 9434.

You alsoLegacy stockholders may request copies of these documentsdissent from Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will provide you with copies of these documents, without charge,the Merger and, upon written or oral request to:

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
Attention: Investor Relations Department
Telephone: (413) 236-3239

If you are a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder and would like to request documents from Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., please do so by ____________ to receive them before the Rome Bancorp, Inc. special meeting.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.
100 W. Dominick Street
Rome, New York 13440

Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders
to be held [Date]

A special meeting of stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. will be held at 5:30 p.m., local time, on [Date] at The Rome Savings Bank, 100 W. Dominick Street, Rome, New York. Any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting will be held at the same location.

At the special meeting, you will be asked to:

1.Consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 12, 2010, by and between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. A copy of the merger agreement is included as Annex A to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus;
2.Consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the merger agreement; and
3.Transact such other business as may be properly presented at the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting.

The enclosed proxy statement/prospectus describes the merger agreement and the proposed merger in detail. We urge you to read these materials carefully. The enclosed proxy statement/prospectus forms a part of this notice.

The board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. unanimously recommends that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the merger agreement and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies to vote in favor of the merger agreement.

The board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. has fixed the close of business on [Record Date] as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting.

Your vote is very important.  Your proxy is being solicited by the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors. The proposal to approve the merger agreement must be approved by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock entitled to vote in order for the proposed merger to be consummated. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person, we urge you to complete and mail the enclosed proxy card, in the accompanying envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the special meeting. If you attend the special meeting and vote in person, your proxy vote will not be used.

Under Delaware law, if the merger is completed, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders of record who do not vote to approve the merger agreement and otherwise complycomplying with the applicable provisionsrequirements of Delaware law, pertaining to dissenters’ rights will be entitled to exercise dissenters’ rights and obtain paymentreceive cash in cashthe amount of the fair value of their shares instead of Rome Bancorp, Inc.shares of Berkshire Hills common stock by followingand/or the procedures set forth in detailcash consideration specified in the enclosed proxy statement/prospectus.Merger Agreement. A copy of the section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertaining to dissenters’ rights is includedattached as Annex CAppendix D to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.You should read the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.statute carefully and consult with your legal counsel if you intend to exercise these rights.

By Order

Material Tax Consequences of the BoardMerger (page 68)

Provided that the merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes, since Legacy stockholders will receive a combination of Directors

Crystal M. Seymore
Secretary

Rome, New York
[Date]


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.

common stock and cash, Legacy stockholders may recognize gain, but not any loss, on the exchange of their stock for Berkshire Hills common stock and cash. For a more detailed discussion of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the transaction, including the tax consequences of the aggregate divestiture premium (described on pages 68TABLE OF CONTENTS

and 70) that may be paid to Legacy stockholders as additional cash consideration for such stockholders’ shares of Legacy common stock, please see the section “Description of the Merger — Material Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 68.

This tax treatment may not apply to all Legacy stockholders. Determining the actual tax consequences of the Merger to Legacy stockholders can be complicated. Legacy stockholders should consult their own tax advisor for a full understanding of the Merger’s tax consequences that are particular to each stockholder.

Page
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETING1
SUMMARY4
RISK FACTORS9
CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS12
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION13
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.14
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF ROME BANCORP, INC.16
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA18
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION19
SPECIAL MEETING OF ROME BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS20
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING STOCKHOLDERS22
DESCRIPTION OF THE MERGER26
DESCRIPTION OF BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. CAPITAL STOCK65
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS67
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS AFTER THE MERGER70
INFORMATION ABOUT ROME BANCORP, INC.71
ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING94
LEGAL MATTERS94
EXPERTS94
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS94
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION94
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. FILINGS (FILE NO. 000-51584)95
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-1

Annex A

Agreement and Plan of Merger

A-1

Annex B

Fairness Opinion of Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.

B-1

Annex C

Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (Dissenters’ rights)

C-1

i



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETINGRISK FACTORS

Q:What am I being asked to vote on? What is the proposed transaction?
A:You are being asked to vote on the approval of a merger agreement that provides for the acquisition of Rome Bancorp, Inc. by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. A copy of the merger agreement is provided as Annex A to this document. The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors has determined that the proposed merger is advisable and in the best interests of its stockholders, has unanimously approved the merger agreement and recommends that its stockholders vote “FOR” the approval of the merger agreement.
Q:What will Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders be entitled to receive in the merger?
A:Under the merger agreement, at the election of each Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder, each share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock will be exchanged for either 0.5658 shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock or $11.25 in cash. Each Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder may elect either of these options or each Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder may elect to exchange some of his or her Rome Bancorp, Inc. shares for cash and some of his or her Rome Bancorp, Inc. shares for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. shares.
Elections will be limited by, among other things, a requirement that 70% of the total number of outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock be exchanged for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Therefore, the form of consideration received will depend in part on the elections of other Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders.
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will not issue fractional shares in the merger. Instead, each Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder will receive a cash payment, without interest, for the value of any fraction of a share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock that such stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive. See “Description of the Merger — Consideration to be Received in the Merger” on page 44 and “Description of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Capital Stock” on page 65.
Q:What dividends will be paid after the merger?
A:Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. currently pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Although Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has paid quarterly dividends on its common stock without interruption since November 2000, there is no guarantee that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will continue to pay dividends on its common stock. All dividends on Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock are declared at the discretion of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. board of directors.
Q:How does a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder elect to receive cash, stock or a combination of both for his or her Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock?
A:For each Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder, a form for making an election will be provided under separate cover. For the election to be effective, the properly completed election form, along with the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates or an appropriate guarantee of delivery, must be sent to and received by Registrar and Transfer Company, the exchange agent, on or before 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on ____________. The election form should not be sent together with your proxy card. Instead, use the separate envelope specifically provided for the election form and your stock certificates. If a timely election is not made, you will be allocated Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and/or cash depending on your election and the elections made by other stockholders.
Q:How does a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder exchange his or her stock certificates?
A:If an election is made, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates or an appropriate guarantee of delivery must be returned with the election form. Shortly after the merger, the exchange agent will allocate cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock among Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders, consistent with their elections and the allocation and proration procedures in the merger agreement. If a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder does not submit an election form, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s transfer agent will send instructions on how and where to surrender the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates after the merger is completed. Please do not send Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates with the proxy card.

In addition to the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, you should consider carefully the risk factors described below, in deciding how to vote. You should keep these risk factors in mind when you read forward-looking statements in this document. Please refer to the section of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus titled “Caution About Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 11.

The price of Berkshire Hills common stock will fluctuate, and therefore Legacy stockholders will not know until the effective time of the Merger the value of the consideration they will receive in the Merger.

Because the per share stock consideration is fixed at 0.56385 shares of Berkshire Hills common stock, the market value of the Berkshire Hills common stock to be issued in the Merger will depend upon the market price of Berkshire Hills common stock. This market price likely will vary from the closing price of Berkshire Hills common stock on the date the Merger was announced, on the date that this proxy statement/prospectus was mailed, and on the date of the Berkshire Hills or Legacy special meeting. Accordingly, at the time of the Legacy special meeting, Legacy stockholders will not necessarily know or be able to calculate the value of the stock consideration they would be entitled to receive upon completion of the Merger. You should obtain current market quotations for shares of Berkshire Hills common stock and for shares of Legacy common stock.

The price of Berkshire Hills common stock might decrease after the Merger.

Following the Merger, holders of Legacy common stock will become stockholders of Berkshire Hills. Berkshire Hills common stock could decline in value after the Merger. For example, during the twelve-month period ending on [Record Date] (the most recent practicable date before the printing of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus), the price of Berkshire Hills common stock varied from a low of $_____ to a high of $_____ and ended that period at $_____. The market value of Berkshire Hills common stock fluctuates based upon general market conditions, Berkshire Hills’ business and prospects and other factors. Further, the market price of Berkshire Hills common stock after the merger may be affected by factors different from those affecting the common stock of Berkshire Hills or Legacy currently. The businesses of Legacy and Berkshire Hills differ and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of the combined company’s shares of common stock may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations and market prices of common stock of each of Legacy and Berkshire Hills. For a discussion of the businesses of Legacy and Berkshire Hills and of certain factors to consider in connection with those businesses, see the documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus and referred to under “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 96.

Berkshire Hills may be unsuccessful in pursuing a plan to divest certain deposits and other liabilities. Such proposed divestiture plan may constitute a material adverse effect on the parties.

Berkshire Hills and Legacy are both headquartered in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and, as a result, each bank has a significant number of branches and deposit market share in and around their headquarters and the surrounding area. Berkshire Hills and Legacy have among the largest deposit market shares in the Pittsfield market area. As part of its regulatory filings, Berkshire Hills has requested the bank regulators and the United States Department of Justice to authorize Berkshire Hills and Legacy to divest approximately $162.0 million in deposits, as well as four Legacy branch offices located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. There can be no assurance as to whether the bank regulators or the United States Department of Justice will accept, deny or modify the proposed divestiture plan, or the timing of such approvals.

In addition, any regulatory approval that includes a requirement that the parties divest more than $200.0 million of deposit liabilities, whether from Legacy, Berkshire Hills or a combination of the two, together with related branch premises and loans, may be considered a material adverse effect as defined in the Merger Agreement, and therefore be cause to terminate the Merger Agreement.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

There can be no assurance that any amount will be paid to Legacy stockholders in respect of divested deposit liabilities.

If Berkshire Hills and Legacy must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a requirement contained in any regulatory approval, and if the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits exceeds 350 basis points, then Berkshire Hills will be required under the Merger Agreement to make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders that, in the aggregate, will equal 50% of the premium in excess of 350 basis points (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium). The right to such payment is not transferable. Such payment would occur following completion of any such divestiture, which is anticipated to occur after completion of the Merger. However, there can be no assurance that Berkshire Hills will be required to divest deposit liabilities. Additionally, in the event Berkshire Hills is required to do so, there can be no assurance that the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits will exceed 350 basis points and the Legacy stockholders will receive any payment with respect to such divested deposit liabilities.

Berkshire Hills may be unable to successfully integrate Legacy’s operations and retain Legacy’s employees.

The Merger involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated independently. The difficulties of combining the operations of the two companies include:

integrating personnel with diverse business backgrounds;
combining different corporate cultures; and
retaining key employees.

The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of the business and the loss of key personnel. The integration of the two companies will require the experience and expertise of certain key employees of Legacy who are expected to be retained by Berkshire Hills. Berkshire Hills may not be successful in retaining these employees for the time period necessary to successfully integrate Legacy’s operations with those of Berkshire Hills. The diversion of management’s attention and any delay or difficulty encountered in connection with the Merger and the integration of the two companies’ operations could have an adverse effect on the business and results of operation of Berkshire Hills following the Merger.

The termination fee and the restrictions on solicitation contained in the Merger Agreement may discourage other companies from trying to acquire Legacy

Until the completion of the Merger, with some exceptions, Legacy is prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or participating in any discussion of or otherwise considering any inquiry or proposal that may lead to an acquisition proposal, such as a merger or other business combination transaction, with any person other than Berkshire Hills. In addition, Legacy has agreed to pay a termination fee to Berkshire Hills in specified circumstances. These provisions could discourage other companies from trying to acquire Legacy even though those other companies might be willing to offer greater value to Legacy’s stockholders than Berkshire Hills has offered in the Merger. The payment of the termination fee could also have a material adverse effect on Legacy’s financial condition. Legacy was afforded the opportunity to solicit additional acquisition proposals from third parties from the date of the Merger Agreement until January 31, 2011, which resulted in no other offers being made to Legacy.

Certain of Legacy’s officers and directors have interests that are different from, or in addition to, interests of Legacy stockholders generally.

You should be aware that the directors and officers of Legacy have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of Legacy stockholders generally. These include: two current Legacy board members joining the Berkshire Hills board of directors upon completion of the Merger; severance payments that certain officers will receive under existing employment or change-in-control agreements, the offer of executive-level employment that the President of Legacy will become subject to upon completion of the Merger; a non-competition and consulting agreement entered into with the Chief Executive Officer of Legacy; the payment for stock options; and provisions in the Merger Agreement relating to


TABLE OF CONTENTS

indemnification of directors and officers and insurance for directors and officers of Legacy for events occurring before the Merger. For a more detailed discussion of these interests, see “Description of the Merger — Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger that are Different from Yours” beginning on page 73.

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact the stock prices and future businesses and financial results of Berkshire Hills and Legacy

If the Merger is not completed, the ongoing businesses of Berkshire Hills and Legacy may be adversely affected and Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be subject to several risks, including the following:

Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be required to pay certain costs relating to the Merger, whether or not the Merger is completed, such as legal, accounting, financial advisor and printing fees;
under the Merger Agreement, Legacy is subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing the Merger, which may adversely affect its ability to execute certain of its business strategies; and
matters relating to the Merger may require substantial commitments of time and resources by Berkshire Hills and Legacy management, which could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to Berkshire Hills and Legacy as independent companies, as the case may be.

In addition, if the Merger is not completed, Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from their respective customers and employees. This risk may be particularly significant since the parties share the same primary market area. Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy also could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger or to enforcement proceedings commenced against Berkshire Hills or Legacy to perform their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement. If the Merger is not completed, Berkshire Hills and Legacy cannot assure their stockholders that the risks described above will not materialize and will not materially affect the business, financial results and stock prices of Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy.

Legacy stockholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the Merger and will exercise less influence over management of the combined organization.

Legacy stockholders currently have the right to vote in the election of the Legacy Board of Directors and on various other matters affecting Legacy. Upon the completion of the Merger, each Legacy stockholder will become a stockholder of Berkshire Hills with a percentage ownership of the combined organization that is much smaller than the stockholder’s percentage ownership of Legacy. It is expected that the former stockholders of Legacy as a group will receive shares in the merger constituting approximately [__]% of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock immediately after the Merger. As a result, Legacy stockholders will have significantly less influence on the management and policies of Berkshire Hills than they now have on the management and policies of Legacy.

The shares of Berkshire Hills common stock to be received by Legacy stockholders receiving the stock consideration as a result of the Merger will have different rights from shares of Legacy common stock.

Following completion of the Merger, Legacy stockholders who receive the stock consideration will no longer be stockholders of Legacy but will instead be stockholders of Berkshire Hills. Although Legacy and Berkshire Hills each are incorporated under Delaware law, there will be important differences between the current rights of Legacy stockholders and the rights of Berkshire Hills stockholders that may be important to Legacy stockholders. See “Comparison of Rights of Stockholders” beginning on page 89 for a discussion of the different rights associated with Berkshire Hills common stock and Legacy common stock.

The fairness opinion obtained by Legacy from its financial advisor does not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion

KBW, Legacy’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, has delivered to the board of directors of Legacy its opinion dated as of December 21, 2010. The opinion of KBW stated that as of such date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Merger consideration to be paid to the holders of the outstanding shares of Legacy common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair


TABLE OF CONTENTS

from a financial point of view to such holders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Berkshire Hills or Legacy, changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or changes in other factors on which the opinion is based, may materially alter or affect the relative values of Berkshire Hills and Legacy.

The fairness opinion obtained by Berkshire Hills from its financial advisor does not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion

Sandler O’Neill, Berkshire Hills’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, has delivered to the board of directors of Berkshire Hills its opinion dated as of December 21, 2010. The opinion of Sandler O’Neill stated that as of such date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Merger consideration to be paid to the holders of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Legacy or Berkshire Hills, changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or changes in other factors on which the opinion is based, may materially alter or affect the relative values of Legacy and Berkshire Hills.

There is no assurance when or even if the Merger will be completed.

Completion of the Merger is subject to satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. See “Description of the Merger — Conditions to Completing the Merger” on page 78. There can be no assurance that Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be able to satisfy the closing conditions or that closing conditions beyond their control will be satisfied or waived.

Berkshire Hills and Legacy can agree at any time to terminate the Merger Agreement, even if Legacy stockholders and Berkshire Hills stockholders have already voted to approve the merger agreement. Berkshire Hills and Legacy can also terminate the Merger Agreement under other specified circumstances.

The Merger is subject to the receipt of consents and approvals from regulatory authorities that may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on Berkshire Hills or, if not obtained, could prevent completion of the Merger.

Before the Merger may be completed, various approvals and consents must be obtained from regulatory entities. These regulators may impose conditions on the completion of the Merger or require changes to the terms of the Merger. Any such conditions or changes could have the effect of delaying completion of the Merger or imposing additional costs on or limiting the revenues of Berkshire Hills following the Merger. In addition, pending elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision and transfer of its responsibilities to other federal banking agencies may adversely affect the timely processing of the applications.

Either Berkshire Hills or Legacy may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not been completed by November 30, 2011, unless the failure of the merger to be completed has resulted from the failure of the party seeking to terminate the merger agreement to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement.

Any failure to successfully integrate the businesses of Rome and Legacy or otherwise realize the expected benefits from Berkshire Hills’ recent mergers could adversely affect Berkshire Hills’ results of operations or financial condition.

There are significant risks and uncertainties associated with mergers and acquisitions. The success of Berkshire Hills’ mergers with Rome and Legacy will depend, in part, on Berkshire Hills’ ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from combining the businesses of Berkshire Hills with Rome and Legacy. If Berkshire Hills is are not able to successfully integrate these businesses, the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the acquisitions may not be realized fully or may take longer to realize than expected. For example, Berkshire Hills may fail to realize the growth opportunities and cost savings anticipated to be derived from the acquisition. In addition, as with regard to any of acquisition, a significant decline in asset valuations or cash flows may also cause Berkshire Hills not to realize expected benefits.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

To the extent that the purchase price, consisting of cash plus the number of shares of Berkshire Hills common stock issued or to be issued in the Rome and Legacy mergers, exceeds the fair value of the net assets, including identifiable intangibles of Rome and Legacy, at the respective merger dates, that amount will be reported as goodwill. In accordance with current accounting guidance, goodwill will not be amortized but will be evaluated for impairment annually. A failure to realize expected benefits of the Rome or Legacy merger could adversely impacting the carrying value of the goodwill recognized in those mergers, and in turn negatively affect Berkshire Hills’ financial condition.

CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this document that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (referred to as the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (referred to as the Securities Exchange Act), and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The sections of this document which contain forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, “Questions And Answers About the Merger and the Special Meeting,” “ Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Description of the Merger — Background of the Merger,” “Description of the Merger — Legacy’s 2011 Management Financial Projections,” and “Description of the Merger — Recommendation of the Legacy Board of Directors; Legacy’s Reasons for the Merger.” You can identify these statements from the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “target” and similar expressions.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including among other things, changes in general economic and business conditions and the risks and other factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 7.

Additional factors that could cause the results of Berkshire Hills or Legacy to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in the filings made by Berkshire Hill and Legacy with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Berkshire Hills Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and the Legacy Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Because of these and other uncertainties, Berkshire Hills’ actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, Berkshire Hills’ and Legacy’s past results of operations do not necessarily indicate Berkshire Hills’ and Legacy’s combined future results. You should not place undue reliance on any of the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. Neither Berkshire Hills nor Legacy is undertaking an obligation to update these forward-looking statements, even though its situation may change in the future, except as required under federal securities law. Each of Berkshire Hills and Legacy qualifies all of its forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following tables show summarized historical financial data for Berkshire Hills and Legacy. You should read this summary financial information in connection with Berkshire Hills’ historical financial information, which is incorporated by reference into this document, and in connection with Legacy’s historical financial information, which is incorporated by reference into this document.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.

     
 At December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Financial Data:
                         
Total assets $2,880,716  $2,700,424  $2,666,729  $2,513,432  $2,149,642 
Loans(1)  2,142,162   1,961,658   2,007,152   1,944,016   1,698,987 
Allowance for loan losses  (31,898  (31,816  (22,908  (22,116  (19,370
Securities  405,953   420,966   341,516   258,497   234,174 
Goodwill and other intangible assets  173,079   176,100   178,830   182,452   121,341 
Total deposits  2,204,441   1,986,762   1,829,580   1,822,563   1,521,938 
Borrowings and subordinated debentures  260,301   306,668   374,621   349,938   360,469 
Total stockholders’ equity  387,960   384,581   408,425   326,837   258,161 
Non-performing loans  13,712   38,700   12,171   10,508   7,592 

     
 For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Data:
                         
Total interest and dividend income $112,277  $115,476  $133,211  $131,944  $118,051 
Total interest expense  35,330   45,880   57,471   68,019   57,811 
Net interest income  76,947   69,596   75,740   63,925   60,240 
Service charges and fee income  29,859   28,181   30,334   26,654   13,539 
All other non-interest income (loss)  1,300   808   1,261   (2,011  (1,491
Total non-interest income  31,159   28,989   31,595   24,643   12,048 
Total net revenue  108,106   98,585   107,335   88,568   72,288 
Provision for loan losses  8,526   47,730   4,580   4,300   7,860 
Total non-interest expense  81,729   78,571   71,699   65,494   48,868 
Income tax expense (benefit) – continuing operations  4,113   (11,649  8,812   5,239   4,668 
Net income from discontinued operations              371 
Net income (loss)  13,738   (16,067  22,244   13,535   11,263 
Less: Cumulative preferred stock dividends and accretion     1,030          
Less: Deemed dividend from preferred stock repayment     2,954          
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $13,738  $(20,051 $22,244  $13,535  $11,263 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Ratios and Other Data:
                         
Performance Ratios:
                         
Return (loss) on average assets(2)  0.50  (0.60)%   0.87  0.60  0.53
Return (loss) on average equity(3)  3.54   (3.90  6.47   4.69   4.40 
Net interest rate spread (tax equivalent)(4)  3.00   2.61   3.06   2.79   2.81 
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(5)  3.27   3.00   3.44   3.26   3.24 
Non-interest income/total net revenue  28.82   29.41   29.44   27.82   16.67 
Non-interest expense/average assets  2.97   2.93   2.81   2.90   2.31 
Efficiency ratio(6)  70.59   73.39   64.40   62.94   58.46 
Capital Ratios:
                         
Average equity/average assets  14.11   15.36   13.49   12.73   12.08 
Equity/total assets  13.47   14.24   15.32   13.00   12.01 
Tier 1 capital to average assets – Berkshire Bank  8.02   7.86   9.34   7.97   7.69 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets – Berkshire Bank  10.58   10.71   12.28   10.40   10.27 
Asset Quality Ratios:
                         
Nonperforming assets/total assets  0.59   1.43   0.48   0.45   0.35 
Nonperforming loans/total loans  0.64   1.97   0.61   0.54   0.45 
Net loans charged-off/average total loans  0.42   1.96   0.19   0.34   0.07 
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans  233   82   188   210   255 
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans  1.49   1.62   1.14   1.14   1.14 
Share Data:
                         
Basic earnings per common share $0.99  $(1.52 $2.08  $1.47  $1.32 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.99   (1.52  2.06   1.44   1.29 
Dividends per common share  0.64   0.64   0.63   0.58   0.56 
Book value per share  27.56   27.64   30.33   31.15   29.63 
Market price at year end  22.11   20.68   30.86   26.00   33.46 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic  13,862   13,189   10,700   9,223   8,538 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted  13,896   13,189   10,791   9,370   8,730 

Note: All performance ratios are based on average balance sheet amounts where applicable.

Q:(1)WhatLoans do not include loans held for sale, which are the tax consequences of the merger to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders?not material.
A:(2)Net income (loss) divided by average total assets.
(3)Net income (loss) divided by average total equity.
(4)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets for the year.
(6)Efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total tangible core non-interest expense by the sum of total net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis and total core non-interest income. Berkshire Hills uses this non-GAAP measure, which is used widely in the banking industry, to provide important information regarding its operational efficiency.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF LEGACY BANCORP, INC.

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Financial Data:
                         
Total assets $916,877  $946,265  $944,657  $924,541  $808,318 
Loans, net(1)  610,941   653,334   695,264   654,024   578,802 
Securities and other investments:  202,331   184,716   152,639   152,054   176,132 
Deposits  685,245   651,378   608,088   610,447   518,248 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances  105,388   160,352   197,898   167,382   127,438 
Repurchase agreements  5,329   6,386   5,238   4,055   5,575 
Total stockholders' equity  111,559   121,367   124,142   133,092   149,997 
Nonperforming loans  12,744   19,578   7,549   1,532   879 
Selected Operating Data:
                         
Total interest and dividend income $40,964  $45,818  $50,327  $49,357  $43,915 
Total interest expense  14,558   18,348   22,465   25,511   20,339 
Net interest income  26,406   27,470   27,862   23,846   23,576 
Provision for loan losses  10,468   4,883   1,465   1,051   233 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  15,938   22,587   26,397   22,795   23,343 
Non-interest income:
                         
Service charges and fees  5,108   4,006   4,541   4,496   4,044 
Gain (loss) on sales or impairment of securities, net  (1,846  (10,267  (3,194  510   (1,736
Gain on sale of loans  607   860   255   270   210 
FHLB prepayment restructuring charge  (1,481            
Gain on curtailment and termination of defined benefit plan              605 
Other  805   788   805   610   329 
Total non-interest income (loss)  3,193   (4,613  2,407   5,886   3,452 
Total non-interest expense  31,043   28,832   26,584   27,187   21,336 
Income (loss) before income taxes  (11,912  (10,858  2,220   1,494   5,459 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $(4,016 $(3,060 $776  $249  $2,653 
Net income (loss)  (7,896  (7,798  1,444   1,245   2,806 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Ratios and Other Data:
                         
Performance Ratios:
                         
Return (loss) on average assets(2)  (0.84)%   (0.82)%   0.16  0.15  0.36
Return (loss) on average equity(3)  (6.48  (6.20  1.11   0.88   1.92 
Net interest rate spread(4)  2.79   2.78   2.80   2.26   2.39 
Net interest margin(5)  3.05   3.13   3.27   3.01   3.15 
Efficiency ratio(6)  96.10   84.9   77.5   93.0   74.2 
Non-interest expense to average assets  3.29   3.04   2.89   3.23   2.70 
Dividend payout ratio  n/a   n/a   111.61   113.82   40.88 
Capital Ratios:
                         
Equity to total assets(7)  12.2  12.8  13.1  14.4  18.6
Average equity to average assets(7)
  12.9   13.3   14.1   16.9   18.5 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets – Bank  12.0   12.3   13.0   13.9   18.9 
Asset Quality Ratios:
                         
Nonperforming assets/total assets  1.63  2.20  0.80  0.17  0.11
Nonperforming loans/total loans  2.07   2.96   1.08   0.23   0.15 
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans  70.70   56.64   87.99   363.45   532.08 
Allowance for loan losses/total loans  1.47   1.67   0.95   0.85   0.80 
Share Data:
                         
Earnings (loss per share) $(0.99 $(0.98 $0.18  $0.14  $0.29 
Dividends per share $0.20  $0.20  $0.20  $0.16  $0.12 
Book value per share – end of year $12.92  $13.89  $14.14  $14.40  $14.55 
Market price at year end  13.14   9.86   10.68   13.26   15.85 

(1)Includes loans held for sale.
(2)Net income (loss) divided by average total assets.
(3)Net income (loss) divided by average total equity.
(4)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets for the year.
(6)The tax consequence ofefficiency ratio represents non-interest expense for the merger to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders will depend on whether only cash, only Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, or a combination of cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and cash is received in exchange for shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. If shares are exchanged solely for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, no gain or loss should be recognized except with respectyear less expenses related to the cash received insteadamortization of any fractional shareintangibles divided by the sum of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. If shares are exchanged solely for cash, gainnet interest income (before loan loss provision) plus non-interest income (excluding net gains or loss should be recognizedlosses on the exchange. If shares were exchanged for a combinationsale or impairment of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and cash, gain should be recognized equal to the lesser of the cash received or the gain realized in the merger (that is, the fair market value of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received, plus the cash received, and minus the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder’s basis in the stockholder’s Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock). No loss should be recognized. See “Material Tax Consequences of the Merger” on page 48securities).
(7)Because the allocations of cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received will depend on the elections of other Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders, the actual tax consequencesRatios are as of the merger will not be known until the allocations are completed.
Q:Are Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders entitled to dissenters’ rights?
A:Yes. Delaware law provides dissenters’ rights in the merger to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders. This means that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders are legally entitled to receive payment in cashend of the fair value of their shares, excluding any appreciation in value that results from the merger. To maintain your dissenters’ rights you must (1) deliver written notice of your intent to demand payment for your shares to Rome Bancorp, Inc. before the special meeting of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders or at the special meeting but before the vote is taken and (2) not vote in favor of the merger. This notice must be in addition to and separate from any abstention or any vote, in person or by proxy, cast against approval of the merger. Neither voting against, abstaining from voting, or failing to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement will constitute notice of intent to demand payment or demand for payment of fair value under Delaware law. Notices should be addressed to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s Secretary and sent to 100 W. Dominick Street, Rome, New York 13440. Your failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under Delaware law will result in the loss of your dissenters’ rights. A copy of the section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertaining to dissenters’ rights is provided as Annex C to this document.year.

n/a = Not Applicable


TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ROME AND LEGACY MERGERS

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information has been prepared using the acquisition method of accounting, giving effect to the merger of Berkshire Hills with Rome and the proposed merger with Legacy. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated statement of financial condition combines the historical financial information of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy as of December 31, 2010 and assumes that the mergers were completed on that date. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated statements of operations combine the historical financial information of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy and give effect to the mergers as if they had been completed as of January 1, 2010. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or financial condition had the mergers been completed on the dates described above, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results of operations in future periods or the future financial position of the combined entities. The financial information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Consolidated Financial Information. Certain reclassifications have been made to Rome's and Legacy’s historical financial information in order to conform to Berkshire Hills' presentation of financial information.

The actual value of Berkshire Hills common stock to be recorded as consideration in these mergers will be based on the closing price of Berkshire Hills common stock at the time of the merger completion dates. The merger with Rome was completed prior to the start of business on April 1, 2011; the closing price of Berkshire Hills’ stock on March 31, 2011 was $20.83, and that price was used to value Berkshire Hills’ stock. The proposed merger with Legacy is targeted for completion in the third quarter of 2011. There can be no assurance that the Legacy merger will be completed as anticipated. For purposes of the pro forma financial information, the fair value of Berkshire Hills common stock to be issued in connection with the Legacy merger was based on the $20.75 average closing price of the stock for the ten day period ending December 15, 2010, which was shortly prior to the date of the execution of the Agreement and Plan of Merger on December 21, 2010.

The pro forma financial information includes estimated adjustments, including adjustments to record assets and liabilities of Rome and Legacy at their respective fair values and represents the pro forma estimates by Berkshire Hills based on available fair value information as of the dates of the respective Agreements and Plans of Merger. In some cases, where noted, more recent information has been used to support estimated adjustments in the pro forma financial information.

The pro forma adjustments included herein are subject to change depending on changes in interest rates and the components of assets and liabilities and as additional information becomes available and additional analyses are performed. The final allocation of the purchase price for each merger will be determined after each merger is completed and after completion of thorough analyses to determine the fair value of Rome’s and Legacy’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities as of the dates the mergers are completed. Increases or decreases in the estimated fair values of the net assets as compared with the information shown in the unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information may change the amount of the purchase price allocated to goodwill and other assets and liabilities and may impact Berkshire Hills’ statement of operations due to adjustments in yield and/or amortization of the adjusted assets or liabilities. Any changes to Rome’s or Legacy’s stockholders’ equity, including results of operations from December 31, 2010 through the dates the mergers are completed, will also change the purchase price allocation, which may include the recording of a lower or higher amount of goodwill. The final adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments presented herein.

Berkshire Hills anticipates that the mergers with Rome and Legacy will provide the combined company with financial benefits that include reduced operating expenses. Berkshire Hills expects to realize cost savings approximating 35% of the anticipated non-interest expense of Rome and approximating 42% of the anticipated non-interest expense of Legacy These cost savings are not included in these pro forma statements and there can be no assurance that expected cost savings will be realized. The pro forma information, while helpful in illustrating the financial characteristics of the combined company under one set of assumptions, does not reflect the benefits of expected cost savings or opportunities to earn additional revenue and, accordingly, does


TABLE OF CONTENTS

not attempt to predict or suggest future results. It also does not necessarily reflect what the historical results of the combined company would have been had our companies been combined during these periods.

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy, which are incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference. See “Rights of Dissenting Stockholders” on page 2234.
Q:Why do Rome Bancorp, Inc.

Legacy stockholders may dissent from the Merger and, upon complying with the requirements of Delaware law, receive cash in the amount of the fair value of their shares instead of shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. wantcommon stock and/or the cash consideration specified in the Merger Agreement. A copy of the section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertaining to merge?

A:Rome Bancorp, Inc. believes thatdissenters’ rights is attached as Appendix D to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.You should read the proposed merger will provide Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholdersstatute carefully and consult with substantial benefits, and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. believesyour legal counsel if you intend to exercise these rights.

Material Tax Consequences of the Merger (page 68)

Provided that the merger will further its strategic growth plans. Asqualify as a larger company,tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes, since Legacy stockholders will receive a combination of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. can providecommon stock and cash, Legacy stockholders may recognize gain, but not any loss, on the capitalexchange of their stock for Berkshire Hills common stock and resourcescash. For a more detailed discussion of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the transaction, including the tax consequences of the aggregate divestiture premium (described on pages 68 and 70) that Rome Bancorp, Inc. needsmay be paid to compete more effectively and to offer a broader arrayLegacy stockholders as additional cash consideration for such stockholders’ shares of products and services to better serve its banking customers. To reviewLegacy common stock, please see the reasons for the merger in more detail, seesection “Description of the Merger — Reasons for the Merger; RecommendationMaterial Tax Consequences of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors”Merger” beginning on page 3268.

Q:What vote is required

This tax treatment may not apply to approveall Legacy stockholders. Determining the merger agreement?

A:Holders of a majorityactual tax consequences of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock entitledMerger to vote must vote in favorLegacy stockholders can be complicated. Legacy stockholders should consult their own tax advisor for a full understanding of the proposalMerger’s tax consequences that are particular to approve the merger agreement.
Q:When and where is the Rome Bancorp, Inc. special meeting?
A:The special meeting of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders is scheduled to take place at The Rome Savings Bank, 100 Dominick Street, Rome, New York at 5:30 p.m., local time, on [Date].
each stockholder.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

Q:In addition to the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, you should consider carefully the risk factors described below, in deciding how to vote. You should keep these risk factors in mind when you read forward-looking statements in this document. Please refer to the section of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus titled “Caution About Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 11.

Who

The price of Berkshire Hills common stock will fluctuate, and therefore Legacy stockholders will not know until the effective time of the Merger the value of the consideration they will receive in the Merger.

Because the per share stock consideration is fixed at 0.56385 shares of Berkshire Hills common stock, the market value of the Berkshire Hills common stock to be issued in the Merger will depend upon the market price of Berkshire Hills common stock. This market price likely will vary from the closing price of Berkshire Hills common stock on the date the Merger was announced, on the date that this proxy statement/prospectus was mailed, and on the date of the Berkshire Hills or Legacy special meeting. Accordingly, at the time of the Legacy special meeting, Legacy stockholders will not necessarily know or be able to calculate the value of the stock consideration they would be entitled to vote atreceive upon completion of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. special meeting?

A:Holders ofMerger. You should obtain current market quotations for shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills common stock atand for shares of Legacy common stock.

The price of Berkshire Hills common stock might decrease after the closeMerger.

Following the Merger, holders of businessLegacy common stock will become stockholders of Berkshire Hills. Berkshire Hills common stock could decline in value after the Merger. For example, during the twelve-month period ending on [Record Date] (the most recent practicable date before the printing of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus), which is the record date, are entitledprice of Berkshire Hills common stock varied from a low of $_____ to vote ona high of $_____ and ended that period at $_____. The market value of Berkshire Hills common stock fluctuates based upon general market conditions, Berkshire Hills’ business and prospects and other factors. Further, the proposal to adoptmarket price of Berkshire Hills common stock after the merger agreement. Asmay be affected by factors different from those affecting the common stock of Berkshire Hills or Legacy currently. The businesses of Legacy and Berkshire Hills differ and, accordingly, the results of operations of the record date, __________combined company and the market price of the combined company’s shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock were outstandingmay be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations and entitledmarket prices of common stock of each of Legacy and Berkshire Hills. For a discussion of the businesses of Legacy and Berkshire Hills and of certain factors to vote.

Q:If I plan to attendconsider in connection with those businesses, see the Rome Bancorp, Inc. special meeting in person, should I still return my proxy?
A:Yes. Whether or not you plan to attend the Rome Bancorp, Inc. special meeting, you should complete and return the enclosed proxy card. The failure of a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder to vote in person ordocuments incorporated by proxy will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the merger agreement.
Q:What do I need to do now to vote my shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock?
A:After you have carefully read and considered the information containedreference in this proxy statement/prospectus please complete, sign, date and mail your proxy cardreferred to under “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 96.

Berkshire Hills may be unsuccessful in pursuing a plan to divest certain deposits and other liabilities. Such proposed divestiture plan may constitute a material adverse effect on the parties.

Berkshire Hills and Legacy are both headquartered in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and, as a result, each bank has a significant number of branches and deposit market share in and around their headquarters and the surrounding area. Berkshire Hills and Legacy have among the largest deposit market shares in the enclosed return envelopePittsfield market area. As part of its regulatory filings, Berkshire Hills has requested the bank regulators and the United States Department of Justice to authorize Berkshire Hills and Legacy to divest approximately $162.0 million in deposits, as soonwell as possible. Thisfour Legacy branch offices located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. There can be no assurance as to whether the bank regulators or the United States Department of Justice will enable your shares toaccept, deny or modify the proposed divestiture plan, or the timing of such approvals.

In addition, any regulatory approval that includes a requirement that the parties divest more than $200.0 million of deposit liabilities, whether from Legacy, Berkshire Hills or a combination of the two, together with related branch premises and loans, may be represented at the special meeting. You may also vote in person at the special meeting. If you do not returnconsidered a properly executed proxy card and do not vote at the special meeting, this will have the samematerial adverse effect as a vote againstdefined in the merger agreement. If you sign, dateMerger Agreement, and send in your proxy card, but you do not indicate how you wanttherefore be cause to vote, your proxyterminate the Merger Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

There can be no assurance that any amount will be votedpaid to Legacy stockholders in favorrespect of adoptiondivested deposit liabilities.

If Berkshire Hills and Legacy must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a requirement contained in any regulatory approval, and if the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits exceeds 350 basis points, then Berkshire Hills will be required under the Merger Agreement to make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders that, in the aggregate, will equal 50% of the merger agreement. Youpremium in excess of 350 basis points (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium). The right to such payment is not transferable. Such payment would occur following completion of any such divestiture, which is anticipated to occur after completion of the Merger. However, there can be no assurance that Berkshire Hills will be required to divest deposit liabilities. Additionally, in the event Berkshire Hills is required to do so, there can be no assurance that the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits will exceed 350 basis points and the Legacy stockholders will receive any payment with respect to such divested deposit liabilities.

Berkshire Hills may change your votebe unable to successfully integrate Legacy’s operations and retain Legacy’s employees.

The Merger involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated independently. The difficulties of combining the operations of the two companies include:

integrating personnel with diverse business backgrounds;
combining different corporate cultures; and
retaining key employees.

The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or revoke your proxy beforeloss of momentum in, the special meeting by filing withactivities of the Secretarybusiness and the loss of Rome Bancorp, Inc. a duly executed revocationkey personnel. The integration of proxy, submitting a new proxy card with a later date, or voting in person at the special meeting.

Q:If my sharestwo companies will require the experience and expertise of certain key employees of Legacy who are held in “street name” by my broker, will my broker automatically vote my shares for me?
A:No. Your broker will not be able to vote your shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement unless you provide instructions on how to vote. Please instruct your broker how to vote your shares, following the directions that your broker provides. If you do not provide instructions to your broker on the proposal to approve the merger agreement, your shares will not be voted, and this will have the effect of voting against the merger agreement. Please check the voting form used by your broker to see if it offers telephone or Internet voting.
Q:When is the merger expected to be completed?
A:Weretained by Berkshire Hills. Berkshire Hills may not be successful in retaining these employees for the time period necessary to successfully integrate Legacy’s operations with those of Berkshire Hills. The diversion of management’s attention and any delay or difficulty encountered in connection with the Merger and the integration of the two companies’ operations could have an adverse effect on the business and results of operation of Berkshire Hills following the Merger.

The termination fee and the restrictions on solicitation contained in the Merger Agreement may discourage other companies from trying to acquire Legacy

Until the completion of the Merger, with some exceptions, Legacy is prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or participating in any discussion of or otherwise considering any inquiry or proposal that may lead to an acquisition proposal, such as a merger or other business combination transaction, with any person other than Berkshire Hills. In addition, Legacy has agreed to pay a termination fee to Berkshire Hills in specified circumstances. These provisions could discourage other companies from trying to acquire Legacy even though those other companies might be willing to offer greater value to Legacy’s stockholders than Berkshire Hills has offered in the Merger. The payment of the termination fee could also have a material adverse effect on Legacy’s financial condition. Legacy was afforded the opportunity to solicit additional acquisition proposals from third parties from the date of the Merger Agreement until January 31, 2011, which resulted in no other offers being made to Legacy.

Certain of Legacy’s officers and directors have interests that are different from, or in addition to, interests of Legacy stockholders generally.

You should be aware that the directors and officers of Legacy have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of Legacy stockholders generally. These include: two current Legacy board members joining the Berkshire Hills board of directors upon completion of the Merger; severance payments that certain officers will tryreceive under existing employment or change-in-control agreements, the offer of executive-level employment that the President of Legacy will become subject to upon completion of the Merger; a non-competition and consulting agreement entered into with the Chief Executive Officer of Legacy; the payment for stock options; and provisions in the Merger Agreement relating to


TABLE OF CONTENTS

indemnification of directors and officers and insurance for directors and officers of Legacy for events occurring before the Merger. For a more detailed discussion of these interests, see “Description of the Merger — Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger that are Different from Yours” beginning on page 73.

Failure to complete the mergerMerger could negatively impact the stock prices and future businesses and financial results of Berkshire Hills and Legacy

If the Merger is not completed, the ongoing businesses of Berkshire Hills and Legacy may be adversely affected and Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be subject to several risks, including the following:

Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be required to pay certain costs relating to the Merger, whether or not the Merger is completed, such as soonlegal, accounting, financial advisor and printing fees;
under the Merger Agreement, Legacy is subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing the Merger, which may adversely affect its ability to execute certain of its business strategies; and
matters relating to the Merger may require substantial commitments of time and resources by Berkshire Hills and Legacy management, which could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to Berkshire Hills and Legacy as possible. Beforeindependent companies, as the case may be.

In addition, if the Merger is not completed, Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from their respective customers and employees. This risk may be particularly significant since the parties share the same primary market area. Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy also could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger or to enforcement proceedings commenced against Berkshire Hills or Legacy to perform their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement. If the Merger is not completed, Berkshire Hills and Legacy cannot assure their stockholders that happens,the risks described above will not materialize and will not materially affect the business, financial results and stock prices of Berkshire Hills and/or Legacy.

Legacy stockholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the Merger and will exercise less influence over management of the combined organization.

Legacy stockholders currently have the right to vote in the election of the Legacy Board of Directors and on various other matters affecting Legacy. Upon the completion of the Merger, each Legacy stockholder will become a stockholder of Berkshire Hills with a percentage ownership of the combined organization that is much smaller than the stockholder’s percentage ownership of Legacy. It is expected that the former stockholders of Legacy as a group will receive shares in the merger agreement must be approved by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders and we must obtain the necessary regulatory approvals. Assuming holders of at least a majorityconstituting approximately [__]% of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills common stock vote in favorimmediately after the Merger. As a result, Legacy stockholders will have significantly less influence on the management and policies of Berkshire Hills than they now have on the management and policies of Legacy.

The shares of Berkshire Hills common stock to be received by Legacy stockholders receiving the stock consideration as a result of the merger agreement and we obtain the other necessary approvals, we expect to complete the merger late in the first calendar quarterMerger will have different rights from shares of 2011.

Q:IsLegacy common stock.

Following completion of the mergerMerger, Legacy stockholders who receive the stock consideration will no longer be stockholders of Legacy but will instead be stockholders of Berkshire Hills. Although Legacy and Berkshire Hills each are incorporated under Delaware law, there will be important differences between the current rights of Legacy stockholders and the rights of Berkshire Hills stockholders that may be important to Legacy stockholders. See “Comparison of Rights of Stockholders” beginning on page 89 for a discussion of the different rights associated with Berkshire Hills common stock and Legacy common stock.

The fairness opinion obtained by Legacy from its financial advisor does not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion

KBW, Legacy’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, has delivered to the board of directors of Legacy its opinion dated as of December 21, 2010. The opinion of KBW stated that as of such date, and based upon and subject to any conditions besides stockholder approval?

A:Yes. The transaction must receive the required regulatory approvals,factors and there are other customary closing conditions that mustassumptions set forth therein, the Merger consideration to be satisfied. To reviewpaid to the conditionsholders of the mergeroutstanding shares of Legacy common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair


TABLE OF CONTENTS

from a financial point of view to such holders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Berkshire Hills or Legacy, changes in more detail, seegeneral market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or changes in other factors on which the opinion is based, may materially alter or affect the relative values of Berkshire Hills and Legacy.

The fairness opinion obtained by Berkshire Hills from its financial advisor does not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion

Sandler O’Neill, Berkshire Hills’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, has delivered to the board of directors of Berkshire Hills its opinion dated as of December 21, 2010. The opinion of Sandler O’Neill stated that as of such date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Merger consideration to be paid to the holders of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Legacy or Berkshire Hills, changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or changes in other factors on which the opinion is based, may materially alter or affect the relative values of Legacy and Berkshire Hills.

There is no assurance when or even if the Merger will be completed.

Completion of the Merger is subject to satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. SeeDescription of the Merger — Conditions to Completing the Merger” on page 5778.

Q:Who There can answer my other questions?
A:If yoube no assurance that Berkshire Hills and Legacy will be able to satisfy the closing conditions or that closing conditions beyond their control will be satisfied or waived.

Berkshire Hills and Legacy can agree at any time to terminate the Merger Agreement, even if Legacy stockholders and Berkshire Hills stockholders have more questions aboutalready voted to approve the merger or howagreement. Berkshire Hills and Legacy can also terminate the Merger Agreement under other specified circumstances.

The Merger is subject to submit your proxythe receipt of consents and approvals from regulatory authorities that may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on Berkshire Hills or, if you neednot obtained, could prevent completion of the Merger.

Before the Merger may be completed, various approvals and consents must be obtained from regulatory entities. These regulators may impose conditions on the completion of the Merger or require changes to the terms of the Merger. Any such conditions or changes could have the effect of delaying completion of the Merger or imposing additional copiescosts on or limiting the revenues of Berkshire Hills following the Merger. In addition, pending elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision and transfer of its responsibilities to other federal banking agencies may adversely affect the timely processing of the applications.

Either Berkshire Hills or Legacy may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not been completed by November 30, 2011, unless the failure of the merger to be completed has resulted from the failure of the party seeking to terminate the merger agreement to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement.

Any failure to successfully integrate the businesses of Rome and Legacy or otherwise realize the expected benefits from Berkshire Hills’ recent mergers could adversely affect Berkshire Hills’ results of operations or financial condition.

There are significant risks and uncertainties associated with mergers and acquisitions. The success of Berkshire Hills’ mergers with Rome and Legacy will depend, in part, on Berkshire Hills’ ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from combining the businesses of Berkshire Hills with Rome and Legacy. If Berkshire Hills is are not able to successfully integrate these businesses, the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the acquisitions may not be realized fully or may take longer to realize than expected. For example, Berkshire Hills may fail to realize the growth opportunities and cost savings anticipated to be derived from the acquisition. In addition, as with regard to any of acquisition, a significant decline in asset valuations or cash flows may also cause Berkshire Hills not to realize expected benefits.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

To the extent that the purchase price, consisting of cash plus the number of shares of Berkshire Hills common stock issued or to be issued in the Rome and Legacy mergers, exceeds the fair value of the net assets, including identifiable intangibles of Rome and Legacy, at the respective merger dates, that amount will be reported as goodwill. In accordance with current accounting guidance, goodwill will not be amortized but will be evaluated for impairment annually. A failure to realize expected benefits of the Rome or Legacy merger could adversely impacting the carrying value of the goodwill recognized in those mergers, and in turn negatively affect Berkshire Hills’ financial condition.

CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this document that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (referred to as the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (referred to as the Securities Exchange Act), and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The sections of this proxy statement/prospectusdocument which contain forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, “Questions And Answers About the Merger and the Special Meeting,” “ Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Description of the Merger — Background of the Merger,” “Description of the Merger — Legacy’s 2011 Management Financial Projections,” and “Description of the Merger — Recommendation of the Legacy Board of Directors; Legacy’s Reasons for the Merger.” You can identify these statements from the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “target” and similar expressions.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including among other things, changes in general economic and business conditions and the risks and other factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 7.

Additional factors that could cause the results of Berkshire Hills or Legacy to differ materially from those described in the enclosed proxy form, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholdersforward-looking statements can be found in the filings made by Berkshire Hill and Legacy with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Berkshire Hills Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and the Legacy Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Because of these and other uncertainties, Berkshire Hills’ actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, Berkshire Hills’ and Legacy’s past results of operations do not necessarily indicate Berkshire Hills’ and Legacy’s combined future results. You should contact:

[Proxy Solicitor Information]

Bank and brokers should call:
(___) __________


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information in this proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all of the information important to you. To understand the merger more fully, you should read this entire document carefully, including the documents attached to this proxy statement/prospectus.

The Companies

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
(413) 443-5601

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a savings and loan holding company headquartered in Pittsfield, Massachusetts that was incorporated and commenced operations in 2000. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BHLB.” Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. conducts its operations primarily through Berkshire Bank, a Massachusetts chartered savings bank with 41 full-service financial centers in Massachusetts, New York and Vermont. Berkshire Bank offers a full complement of deposit, lending and investment products from a team of employees with extensive experience in banking, insurance and investment management. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. is also the holding company for Berkshire Insurance Group, an insurance agency in western Massachusetts. At September 30, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. had total assets of $2.8 billion, total deposits of $2.1 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $382.9 million.

Rome Bancorp, Inc.
100 W. Dominick Street
Rome, New York 13440
(508) 752-4800

Rome Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a savings and loan holding company headquartered in Rome, New York that was incorporated and commenced operations as a holding company in 1999. Its primary business is operating its subsidiary, The Rome Savings Bank, which operates five full-service community banking offices in Rome, Lee and New Hartford, New York. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “ROME.” Its primary business includes residential real estate lending (for portfolio and sale on the secondary market), small business loan and deposit services as well as variety of consumer loan and deposit services. As of September 30, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. had total assets of $331.6 million, total deposits of $226.9 million and total stockholder’s equity of $61.8 million.

Special Meeting of Rome Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders; Required Vote (page 20)

A special meeting of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders is scheduled to be held at The Rome Savings Bank, 100 W. Dominick Street, Rome, New York at 5:30 p.m., local time, on [Date]. At the special meeting, you will be asked to vote on a proposal to approve the merger agreement between Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. You may also be asked to vote to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve the merger agreement.

Only Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders of record as of the close of business on [Record Date] are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

Approval of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock entitled to vote. As of the record date, there were _________ shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock outstanding. The directors and executive officers of Rome Bancorp, Inc., as a group, beneficially owned _______ shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock, representing ____% of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock as of the record date and have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger at the special meeting.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Merger and the Merger Agreement (page 26)

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s acquisition of Rome Bancorp, Inc. is governed by a merger agreement. The merger agreement provides that, if all of the conditions are satisfied or waived, Rome Bancorp, Inc. will be merged with and into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. as the surviving entity.We encourage you to read the merger agreement, which is included as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus.

What Rome Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders Will Receive in the Consideration to be Received in the Merger (page 44)

Under the merger agreement, at your election, each share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock you own will be exchanged for either 0.5658 shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock or $11.25 in cash, or a combination of cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, subject to 70% of the aggregate merger consideration being exchanged for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock.

Comparative Market Prices (page 0)

The following table shows the closing price per share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and the equivalent price per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock, giving effect to the merger, on October 11, 2010, which is the last day on which shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock traded preceding the public announcement of the proposed merger, and on [Record Date], the most recent practicable date prior to the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus. The equivalent price per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock was computed by multiplying the price of a share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock by the 0.5658 exchange ratio. See “Description of the Merger — Consideration to be Received in the Merger” on page 44.

  
 Berkshire Hills
Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock
 Equivalent Price Per
Share of Rome
Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock
October 11, 2010 $18.78  $10.63 
[Record Date] $  $ 

Recommendation of Rome Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors (page 0)

The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors has unanimously approved the merger agreement and the proposed merger. The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board believes that the merger agreement, including the merger contemplated by the merger agreement, is fair to, and in the best interests of, Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its stockholders, and thereforeunanimously recommends that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the merger agreement. In its reaching this decision, Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors considered a variety of factors, which are described in the section captioned “Description of the Merger — Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors” beginning on page 32.

The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directorsunanimously recommends that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the merger agreement.

Opinion of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s Financial Advisor (page 37)

In deciding to approve the merger, one of the factors considered by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors was the opinion of Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P., (“Sandler O’Neill”) which served as financial advisor to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors. Sandler O’Neill delivered its oral opinion on October 8, 2010, which was confirmed in writing on October 12, 2010, that the merger consideration is fair to the holders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock from a financial point of view. The full text of this opinion is included as Annex B to the proxy statement/prospectus. You should read the opinion carefully to understand the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of the review conducted by Sandler O’Neill. Rome Bancorp, Inc. has agreed to pay Sandler O’Neill a fee equal to one percent of the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

aggregate purchase price contingent upon completion of the merger for its services in connection with the merger. Sandler O’Neill has received a fee of $200,000 for the rendering of its fairness opinion, which fee shall be credited against the one percent fee referenced above if the merger is completed.

Regulatory Matters Relating to the Merger (page 51)

Under the terms of the merger agreement, the merger cannot be completed unless it is first approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Massachusetts Division of Banks and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. filed the required applications on November 17, 2010. As of the date of this document, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has not received any approvals from those regulators. While Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. does not know of any reason why it would not be able to obtain approval in a timely manner, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. cannot be certain when or if it will receive regulatory approval.

Conditions to Completing the Merger (page 57)

The completion of the merger is subject to the fulfillment of a number of conditions, including:

approval of the merger agreement at the special meeting by at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock entitled to vote;
approval of the transaction by the appropriate regulatory authorities;
receipt by each party of opinions from their respective legal counsel to the effect that the merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code;
the continued accuracy of representations and warranties made on the date of the merger agreement; and
no material adverse effect on either party has occurred.

Terminating the Merger Agreement (page 63)

The merger agreement may be terminated by mutual consent of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. at any time prior to the completion of the merger. Additionally, subject to conditions and circumstances described in the merger agreement, either Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Rome Bancorp, Inc. may terminate the merger agreement if, among other things, any of the following occur:

the merger has not been consummated by June 30, 2011;
Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders do not approve the merger agreement at the Rome Bancorp, Inc. special meeting;
a required regulatory approval is denied or a governmental authority blocks the merger; or
there is a breach by the other party of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement contained in the merger agreement, which cannot be cured, or has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of written notice to such party of such breach.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may also terminate the merger agreement if Rome Bancorp, Inc. materially breaches its agreements regarding the solicitation of other acquisition proposals and the submission of the merger agreement to stockholders or if the board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. does not recommend approval of the merger in the proxy statement/prospectus or withdraws or revises its recommendation in a manner adverse to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.

Termination Fee (page 63)

Under certain circumstances described in the merger agreement, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may demand from Rome Bancorp, Inc. a $3.5 million termination fee in connection with the termination of the merger agreement. See“Description of the Merger — Termination Fee” on page 63 for a list of the circumstances under which a termination fee is payable.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger that are Different from Yours (page 52)

In considering the recommendation of the board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. to adopt the merger agreement, you should be aware that officers and directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. have employment and other compensation agreements or plans that give them interests in the merger that are somewhat different from, or in addition to, their interests as Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders. These interests and agreements include:

Employment agreements that provide for severance payments in connection with a termination of employment without cause or for good reason following a change in control;
Change in control agreements that provide for severance payments in connection with a termination of employment without cause or for good reason following a change in control;
Interests under a Benefit Restoration Plan and Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, each of which will be terminated in connection with the change in control, with the benefits paid to the participants in a lump sum;
An agreement between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. to make a one-time payment to John Reinhardt, a director of Rome Bancorp, Inc., upon the completion of the merger;
A consulting and non-competition agreement that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Bank have entered into with Charles M. Sprock, President and Chief Executive Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and The Rome Savings Bank;
The termination of all outstanding Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock options, whether or not vested; with a payment to the holder of the option of an amount of cash equal to (i) the greater of (A) the excess, if any, of the cash consideration over the applicable per share price of that option or (B) $1.00, multiplied by (ii) the number of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc., Inc common stock that the holder could have purchased with the option if the holder had exercised the option immediately prior to the effective time;
The acceleration of vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards; and
Rights of Rome Bancorp, Inc. officers and directors to continued indemnification coverage and continued coverage under directors and officers’ liability insurance policies.

Accounting Treatment of the Merger (page 47)

The merger will be accounted for using the acquisition method in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Comparison of Rights of Stockholders (page 67)

When the merger is completed, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who are to receive shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will become Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholders and their rights will be governed by Delaware law and by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws. See“Comparison of Rights of Stockholders” beginning on page 67 for a summary of the material differences between the respective rights of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholders.

Rights of Dissenting Stockholders (page 22)

Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders may dissent from the merger and, upon complying with the requirements of Delaware law, receive cash in the amount of the fair value of their shares instead of shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and/or the cash consideration specified in the merger agreement. A copy of the section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertaining to dissenters’ rights is attached as Annex C to this proxy statement/prospectus.You should read the statute carefully and consult with your legal counsel if you intend to exercise these rights.

Material Tax Consequences of the Merger (page 48)

The federal tax consequences of the merger to stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. will depend primarily on whether they exchange their Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock solely for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, solely for cash or for a combination of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and cash.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who exchange their shares solely for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock should not recognize gain or loss except with respect to the cash they receive instead of a fractional share. Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who exchange their shares solely for cash should recognize gain or loss on the exchange. Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who exchange their shares for a combination of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and cash should recognize gain, but not any loss, on the exchange. The actual federal income tax consequences to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders of electing to receive cash, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock or a combination of cash and stock will not be ascertainable at the time Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders make their election because it will not be known at that time how, or to what extent, the allocation and proration procedures will apply.

This tax treatment may not apply to all Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders. Determining the actual tax consequences of the merger to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders can be complicated. Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders should consult their own tax advisor for a full understanding of the merger’s tax consequences that are particular to each stockholder.

To review the tax consequences of the merger to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders in greater detail, please see the section“Description of the Merger — Material Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 48.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, you should consider carefully the risk factors described below, in deciding how to vote. You should keep these risk factors in mind when you read forward-looking statements in this document. Please refer to the section of this proxy statement/prospectus titled “Caution About Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 12.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders may receive a form of consideration different from what they elect.

The consideration to be received by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders in the merger is subject to the requirement that 70% of the shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock be exchanged for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and the remaining 30% be exchanged for cash. The merger agreement contains proration and allocation methods to achieve this desired result. If you elect all cash and the available cash is oversubscribed, then you will receive a portion of the merger consideration in Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. If you elect all stock and the available stock is oversubscribed, then you will receive a portion of the merger consideration in cash.

The price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock might decrease after the merger.

Following the merger, many holders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock will become stockholders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock could decline in value after the merger. For example, during the twelve-month period ending on [Record Date] (the most recent practicable date before the printing of this proxy statement/prospectus), the price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock varied from a low of $_____ to a high of $_____ and ended that period at $_____. The market value of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock fluctuates based upon general market economic conditions, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s business and prospects and other factors.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may be unable to successfully integrate Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s operations and retain Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s employees.

The merger involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated independently. The difficulties of combining the operations of the two companies include:

integrating personnel with diverse business backgrounds;
combining different corporate cultures; and
retaining key employees.

The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of the business and the loss of key personnel. The integration of the two companies will require the experience and expertise of certain key employees of Rome Bancorp, Inc. who are expected to be retained by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may not be successful in retaining these employees for the time period necessary to successfully integrate Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s operations with those of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. The diversion of management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the merger and the integration of the two companies’ operations could have an adverse effect on the business and results of operation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. following the merger.

The termination fee and the restrictions on solicitation contained in the merger agreement may discourage other companies from trying to acquire Rome Bancorp, Inc.

Until the completion of the merger, with some exceptions, Rome Bancorp, Inc. is prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or participating in any discussion of or otherwise considering any inquiries or proposals that may lead to an acquisition proposal, such as a merger or other business combination transaction, with any person other than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. In addition, Rome Bancorp, Inc. has agreed to pay a termination fee to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. in specified circumstances. These provisions could discourage other companies from trying to acquire Rome Bancorp, Inc. even though those other companies might be willing to offer greater value to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stockholders than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has offered in the merger. The payment of the termination fee could also have a material adverse effect on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s financial condition.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certain of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s officers and directors have interests that are different from, or in addition to, interests of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stockholders generally.

You should be aware that the directors and officers of Rome Bancorp, Inc. have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders generally. These include: severance payments that certain officers will receive under existing employment or change-in-control agreements, a consulting and non-compete agreement that one former officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. will become subject to upon completion of the merger; the payment for stock options; provisions in the merger agreement relating to indemnification of directors and officers and insurance for directors and officers of Rome Bancorp, Inc. for events occurring before the merger; and the establishment of an advisory board of directors comprised of Rome Bancorp, Inc. board members. For a more detailed discussion of these interests, see “Description of the Merger — Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger that are Different from Yours” beginning on page 52.

Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. challenging the merger, and an adverse judgment in any such lawsuit may prevent the merger from being completed or from being completed within the expected timeframe.

Both Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. are named as defendants in purported class action lawsuits brought by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders challenging the proposed merger, seeking, among other things, to enjoin completion of the merger on the agreed-upon terms. See “Description of the Merger — Litigation Relating to the Merger” beginning on page 64 for more information about the purported class action lawsuits related to the merger that has been filed.

One of the conditions to the closing of the merger is that no order, injunction (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) or decree issued by a court or other agency of competent jurisdiction that makes the merger or the bank merger illegal or prohibits the completion of the merger shall be in effect. As such, if the plaintiffs are successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting the completion of the merger on the agreed-upon terms, then such injunction may prevent the merger from being completed, or from being completed within the expected timeframe.

If you are a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder and you make a valid cash or stock election, you will not be able to sell your shares during certain times.

If you are a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder of record as of the record date for the special meeting, holding your shares in certificated form and want to make a valid cash or stock election, you will have to deliver a properly completed and signed form of election and your stock certificates to the exchange agent. For further details on the determination of the election deadline, see “The Merger — Election Procedures; Surrender of Stock Certificates” on page 46. The election deadline will be the later of the day of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. special meeting and the date the parties believe to be as near as practicable to five business days before the completion of the merger. You will not be able to sell any certificated shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock that you have delivered as part of your election unless you revoke your election before the deadline by providing written notice to the exchange agent. If you do not revoke your election before the election deadline, you will not be able to liquidate your investment in Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock for any reason until you receive cash and/or Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock following completion of the merger. Similarly, holders of book-entry shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock who have made a valid election and have not revoked their election prior to the election deadline will not be able to sell any shares for which they have made a valid election after the election deadline. In the time between the election deadline and the completion of the merger, the trading price of Rome Bancorp, Inc. or Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock may decrease, and you might otherwise want to sell your shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock to gain access to cash, make other investments, or reduce the potential for a decrease in the value of your investment. The date that you will receive your merger consideration depends on the completion date of the merger, which is uncertain. The completion date of the merger might be later than expected due to unforeseen events, such as delays in obtaining regulatory approvals.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Failure to complete the merger could negatively impact the stock prices and future businesses and financial results of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.

If the merger is not completed, the ongoing businesses of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. may be adversely affected and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. will be subject to several risks, including the following:

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. will be required to pay certain costs relating to the merger, whether or not the merger is completed, such as legal, accounting, financial advisor and printing fees;
under the merger agreement, Rome Bancorp, Inc. is subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing the merger, which may adversely affect its ability to execute certain of its business strategies; and
matters relating to the merger may require substantial commitments of time and resources by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. management, which could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. as independent companies, as the case may be.

In addition, if the merger is not completed, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and/or Rome Bancorp, Inc. may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from their respective customers and employees. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and/or Rome Bancorp, Inc. also could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the merger or to enforcement proceedings commenced against Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Rome Bancorp, Inc. to perform their respective obligations under the merger agreement. If the merger is not completed, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. cannot assure their stockholders that the risks described above will not materialize and will not materially affect the business, financial results and stock prices of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and/or Rome Bancorp, Inc.

The shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be received by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders receiving the stock consideration as a result of the merger will have different rights from shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock.

Following completion of the merger, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who receive the stock consideration will no longer be stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, but will instead be stockholders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation. There will be important differences between your current rights as a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder and the rights to which you swill be entitled as a Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholder. See “Comparison of Rights of Stockholders” beginning on page 67 for a discussion of the different rights associated with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock.

The fairness opinion obtained by Rome Bancorp, Inc. from its financial advisor will not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion

Sandler O’Neill, Rome Bancorp, Inc’s financial advisor in connection with the merger, has delivered to the board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. its opinion dated as of October 12, 2010. The opinion of Sandler O’Neill stated that as of such date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the merger consideration to be paid to the holders of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Rome Bancorp, Inc., changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or changes in other factors on which the opinion is based, may materially alter or affect the relative values of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this document that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (referred to as the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (referred to as the Securities Exchange Act), and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The sections of this document which contain forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, “Questions And Answers About the Merger and the Special Meeting” “Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Description of the Merger — Background of the Merger,” and “Description of the Merger — Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of the Board of Directors.” You can identify these statements from the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “target” and similar expressions.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including among other things, changes in general economic and business conditions and the risks and other factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 9.

Because of these and other uncertainties, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s and Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s past results of operations do not necessarily indicate Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s and Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s combined future results. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. is not undertaking an obligation to update these forward-looking statements, even though its situation may change in the future, except as required under federal securities law. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. qualifies all of its forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following tables show summarized historical financial data for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. You should read this summary financial information in connection with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s historical financial information, which is incorporated by reference into this document, and in connection with Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s historical financial information, which appears elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.

Unaudited consolidated interim financial statements for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. at or for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and unaudited consolidated interim financial statements for Rome Bancorp, Inc. at or for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 include normal, recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present the data for those periods. The unaudited data is not necessarily indicative of expected results of a full year’s operation.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.

      
 At September 30, 2010 At December 31,
(In thousands) 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Selected Financial Condition Data:
                              
Total assets $2,798,439  $2,700,424  $2,666,729  $2,513,432  $2,149,642  $2,035,553 
Loans, net  2,022,273   1,929,842   1,984,244   1,921,900   1,679,617   1,407,229 
Securities  413,207   420,966   341,516   258,497   234,174   420,320 
Total cash and cash equivalents  38,382   32,608   44,798   41,142   30,985   31,087 
Goodwill and other intangibles assets  173,796   176,100   178,830   182,452   121,341   99,616 
Total deposits  2,068,747   1,986,762   1,829,580   1,822,563   1,521,938   1,371,218 
Borrowings and subordinated debentures  309,276   306,668   374,621   349,938   360,469   412,917 
Total stockholders’ equity  382,915   384,581   408,425   326,837   258,161   246,066 
Allowance for loan losses  31,836   31,816   22,908   22,116   19,370   13,001 
Non-performing loans  16,386   38,700   12,171   10,508   7,592   1,186 
Non-performing assets  19,286   38,730   12,669   11,374   7,592   1,186 

       
       
 For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Selected Operating Data:
                                   
Total interest and dividend income $83,908  $87,105  $115,476  $133,211  $131,944  $118,051  $87,732 
Total interest expense  27,056   35,505   45,880   57,471   68,019   57,811   36,115 
Net interest income  56,852   51,600   69,596   75,740   63,925   60,240   51,617 
Service charges and fee income  22,662   22,071   28,181   30,334   26,654   13,539   9,373 
All other non-interest income (loss)  714   2,266   808   1,261   (2,011  (1,491  5,550 
Total non-interest income  23,376   24,337   28,989   31,595   24,643   12,048   14,923 
Total net revenue  80,228   75,937   98,585   107,335   88,568   72,288   66,540 
Provision for loan losses  6,526   9,000   47,730   4,580   4,300   7,860   1,313 
Total non-interest expense  60,314   57,375   78,571   71,699   65,494   48,868   48,998 
Income tax expense (benefit) – continuing operations  3,220   1,426   (11,649  8,812   5,239   4,668   8,003 
Net income from discontinued
operations
                 371    
Net income (loss) $10,168  $8,136  $(16,067 $22,244  $13,535  $11,263  $8,226 
Less: Cumulative preferred stock dividends and accretion     1,030   1,030             
Less: Deemed dividend from preferred stock repayment     2,954   2,954             
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $10,168  $4,152  $(20,051 $22,244  $13,535  $11,263  $8,226 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

       
       
 At or for the Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Selected Operating Ratios and Other Data:
                                   
Performance Ratios:
                                   
Return on average assets  0.50  0.41  (0.60)%   0.87  0.60  0.53  0.47
Return on average equity  3.49   2.64   (3.90  6.47   4.69   4.40   4.19 
Net interest rate spread (tax equivalent)  2.97   2.60   2.61   3.06   2.79   2.81   3.00 
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)  3.26   2.99   3.00   3.44   3.26   3.24   3.33 
Non-interest income/total net revenue  29.14   32.05   29.41   29.44   27.82   16.67   22.43 
Non-interest expense/average assets  2.95   2.86   2.93   2.81   2.90   2.31   2.81 
Efficiency ratio(1)  70.48   71.00   73.39   61.40   62.94   58.46   57.03 
Capital Ratios:
                                   
Average stockholders’ equity/average total assets  14.26   15.40   15.36   13.49   12.73   12.08   11.26 
Stockholders’ equity/total assets at period end  13.68   15.31   14.24   15.32   13.00   12.01   12.09 
Tangible common stockholders’ equity to tangible assets(2)  7.96   9.32   8.26   7.75   6.22   6.75   7.56 
Regulatory Capital Ratios:
                                   
Tier 1 capital to average assets – bank  8.07   9.30   7.86   9.34   7.97   7.69   7.79 
Total risk-based capital – bank  10.75   12.26   10.71   12.28   10.40   10.27   11.12 
Asset Quality Ratios:
                                   
Nonperforming loans as percent of loans  0.80   1.14   1.97   0.61   0.54   0.45   0.08 
Nonperforming assets as percent of total assets  0.69   0.85   1.43   0.48   0.45   0.35   0.06 
Net loans charged-off/average total loans  0.43   0.52   1.96   0.19   0.34   0.07   0.08 
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans  1.55   1.22   1.62   1.14   1.14   1.14   0.92 
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans  1.94x   1.07x   0.82x   1.88x   2.10x   2.55x   10.96x 
Share Data:
                                   
Basic earnings (loss) per common share $0.73  $0.32  $(1.52 $2.08  $1.47  $1.32  $1.16 
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share  0.73   0.32   (1.52  2.06   1.44   1.29   1.10 
Dividends per common share  0.48   0.48   0.64   0.63   0.58   0.56   0.52 
Book value per share  27.28   29.46   27.64   30.33   31.15   29.63   28.81 
Market price at period end  18.96   21.94   20.68   30.86   26.00   33.46   33.50 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic  13,852   12,977   13,189   10,700   9,223   8,538   7,122 
Weighted average common hares outstanding – diluted  13,883   13,145   13,189   10,791   9,370   8,730   7,503 
Full Service Offices:  41   39   40   39   38   27   24 
not place undue reliance on any of the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. Neither Berkshire Hills nor Legacy is undertaking an obligation to update these forward-looking statements, even though its situation may change in the future, except as required under federal securities law. Each of Berkshire Hills and Legacy qualifies all of its forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following tables show summarized historical financial data for Berkshire Hills and Legacy. You should read this summary financial information in connection with Berkshire Hills’ historical financial information, which is incorporated by reference into this document, and in connection with Legacy’s historical financial information, which is incorporated by reference into this document.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.

     
 At December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Financial Data:
                         
Total assets $2,880,716  $2,700,424  $2,666,729  $2,513,432  $2,149,642 
Loans(1)  2,142,162   1,961,658   2,007,152   1,944,016   1,698,987 
Allowance for loan losses  (31,898  (31,816  (22,908  (22,116  (19,370
Securities  405,953   420,966   341,516   258,497   234,174 
Goodwill and other intangible assets  173,079   176,100   178,830   182,452   121,341 
Total deposits  2,204,441   1,986,762   1,829,580   1,822,563   1,521,938 
Borrowings and subordinated debentures  260,301   306,668   374,621   349,938   360,469 
Total stockholders’ equity  387,960   384,581   408,425   326,837   258,161 
Non-performing loans  13,712   38,700   12,171   10,508   7,592 

     
 For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Data:
                         
Total interest and dividend income $112,277  $115,476  $133,211  $131,944  $118,051 
Total interest expense  35,330   45,880   57,471   68,019   57,811 
Net interest income  76,947   69,596   75,740   63,925   60,240 
Service charges and fee income  29,859   28,181   30,334   26,654   13,539 
All other non-interest income (loss)  1,300   808   1,261   (2,011  (1,491
Total non-interest income  31,159   28,989   31,595   24,643   12,048 
Total net revenue  108,106   98,585   107,335   88,568   72,288 
Provision for loan losses  8,526   47,730   4,580   4,300   7,860 
Total non-interest expense  81,729   78,571   71,699   65,494   48,868 
Income tax expense (benefit) – continuing operations  4,113   (11,649  8,812   5,239   4,668 
Net income from discontinued operations              371 
Net income (loss)  13,738   (16,067  22,244   13,535   11,263 
Less: Cumulative preferred stock dividends and accretion     1,030          
Less: Deemed dividend from preferred stock repayment     2,954          
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $13,738  $(20,051 $22,244  $13,535  $11,263 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Ratios and Other Data:
                         
Performance Ratios:
                         
Return (loss) on average assets(2)  0.50  (0.60)%   0.87  0.60  0.53
Return (loss) on average equity(3)  3.54   (3.90  6.47   4.69   4.40 
Net interest rate spread (tax equivalent)(4)  3.00   2.61   3.06   2.79   2.81 
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(5)  3.27   3.00   3.44   3.26   3.24 
Non-interest income/total net revenue  28.82   29.41   29.44   27.82   16.67 
Non-interest expense/average assets  2.97   2.93   2.81   2.90   2.31 
Efficiency ratio(6)  70.59   73.39   64.40   62.94   58.46 
Capital Ratios:
                         
Average equity/average assets  14.11   15.36   13.49   12.73   12.08 
Equity/total assets  13.47   14.24   15.32   13.00   12.01 
Tier 1 capital to average assets – Berkshire Bank  8.02   7.86   9.34   7.97   7.69 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets – Berkshire Bank  10.58   10.71   12.28   10.40   10.27 
Asset Quality Ratios:
                         
Nonperforming assets/total assets  0.59   1.43   0.48   0.45   0.35 
Nonperforming loans/total loans  0.64   1.97   0.61   0.54   0.45 
Net loans charged-off/average total loans  0.42   1.96   0.19   0.34   0.07 
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans  233   82   188   210   255 
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans  1.49   1.62   1.14   1.14   1.14 
Share Data:
                         
Basic earnings per common share $0.99  $(1.52 $2.08  $1.47  $1.32 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.99   (1.52  2.06   1.44   1.29 
Dividends per common share  0.64   0.64   0.63   0.58   0.56 
Book value per share  27.56   27.64   30.33   31.15   29.63 
Market price at year end  22.11   20.68   30.86   26.00   33.46 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic  13,862   13,189   10,700   9,223   8,538 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted  13,896   13,189   10,791   9,370   8,730 

Note: All performance ratios are based on average balance sheet amounts where applicable.

N/M = Not Meaningful

(1)Efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total tangible recurring non-interest expense by the sum of total net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis and total recurring non-interest income. The Company
(1)Loans do not include loans held for sale, which are not material.
(2)Net income (loss) divided by average total assets.
(3)Net income (loss) divided by average total equity.
(4)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets for the year.
(6)Efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total tangible core non-interest expense by the sum of total net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis and total core non-interest income. Berkshire Hills uses this non-GAAP measure, which is used widely in the banking industry, to provide important information regarding its operational efficiency.
(2)Tangible common stockholders’ equity to tangible assets exclude goodwill and other intangibles. This is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company believes provide investors with information that is useful in understanding our financial performance and condition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF LEGACY BANCORP, INC.

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Financial Data:
                         
Total assets $916,877  $946,265  $944,657  $924,541  $808,318 
Loans, net(1)  610,941   653,334   695,264   654,024   578,802 
Securities and other investments:  202,331   184,716   152,639   152,054   176,132 
Deposits  685,245   651,378   608,088   610,447   518,248 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances  105,388   160,352   197,898   167,382   127,438 
Repurchase agreements  5,329   6,386   5,238   4,055   5,575 
Total stockholders' equity  111,559   121,367   124,142   133,092   149,997 
Nonperforming loans  12,744   19,578   7,549   1,532   879 
Selected Operating Data:
                         
Total interest and dividend income $40,964  $45,818  $50,327  $49,357  $43,915 
Total interest expense  14,558   18,348   22,465   25,511   20,339 
Net interest income  26,406   27,470   27,862   23,846   23,576 
Provision for loan losses  10,468   4,883   1,465   1,051   233 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  15,938   22,587   26,397   22,795   23,343 
Non-interest income:
                         
Service charges and fees  5,108   4,006   4,541   4,496   4,044 
Gain (loss) on sales or impairment of securities, net  (1,846  (10,267  (3,194  510   (1,736
Gain on sale of loans  607   860   255   270   210 
FHLB prepayment restructuring charge  (1,481            
Gain on curtailment and termination of defined benefit plan              605 
Other  805   788   805   610   329 
Total non-interest income (loss)  3,193   (4,613  2,407   5,886   3,452 
Total non-interest expense  31,043   28,832   26,584   27,187   21,336 
Income (loss) before income taxes  (11,912  (10,858  2,220   1,494   5,459 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $(4,016 $(3,060 $776  $249  $2,653 
Net income (loss)  (7,896  (7,798  1,444   1,245   2,806 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
 At or For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Selected Operating Ratios and Other Data:
                         
Performance Ratios:
                         
Return (loss) on average assets(2)  (0.84)%   (0.82)%   0.16  0.15  0.36
Return (loss) on average equity(3)  (6.48  (6.20  1.11   0.88   1.92 
Net interest rate spread(4)  2.79   2.78   2.80   2.26   2.39 
Net interest margin(5)  3.05   3.13   3.27   3.01   3.15 
Efficiency ratio(6)  96.10   84.9   77.5   93.0   74.2 
Non-interest expense to average assets  3.29   3.04   2.89   3.23   2.70 
Dividend payout ratio  n/a   n/a   111.61   113.82   40.88 
Capital Ratios:
                         
Equity to total assets(7)  12.2  12.8  13.1  14.4  18.6
Average equity to average assets(7)
  12.9   13.3   14.1   16.9   18.5 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets – Bank  12.0   12.3   13.0   13.9   18.9 
Asset Quality Ratios:
                         
Nonperforming assets/total assets  1.63  2.20  0.80  0.17  0.11
Nonperforming loans/total loans  2.07   2.96   1.08   0.23   0.15 
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans  70.70   56.64   87.99   363.45   532.08 
Allowance for loan losses/total loans  1.47   1.67   0.95   0.85   0.80 
Share Data:
                         
Earnings (loss per share) $(0.99 $(0.98 $0.18  $0.14  $0.29 
Dividends per share $0.20  $0.20  $0.20  $0.16  $0.12 
Book value per share – end of year $12.92  $13.89  $14.14  $14.40  $14.55 
Market price at year end  13.14   9.86   10.68   13.26   15.85 

(1)Includes loans held for sale.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF ROME BANCORP, INC.

    
 At September 30,
2010
 At December 31,
   2009 2008 2007
   (in thousands)
Selected Financial Condition Data:
                    
Total assets $331,607  $329,922  $337,886  $318,131 
Loans, net  275,238   285,617   298,453   281,042 
Securities  18,065   14,677   8,588   6,165 
Total cash and cash equivalents  15,998   7,574   9,579   8,018 
Total deposits  226,877   216,639   205,932   203,032 
Borrowings  37,873   47,869   66,324   40,333 
Total equity  61,819   60,365   60,344   69,037 
Allowance for loan losses  2,595   2,132   1,936   1,910 
Non-performing loans  2,072   1,915   1,273   1,003 
Non-performing assets  2,072   1,915   1,604   1,100 

     
 For the Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 For the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2009 2008 2007
   (in thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
                         
Interest income $12,637  $12,996  $17,291  $17,954  $17,919 
Interest expense  2,300   3,259   4,250   4,887   4,798 
Net interest income  10,337   9,737   13,041   13,067   13,121 
Provision for loan losses  540   200   300   300   50 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  9,797   9,537   12,741   12,767   13,071 
Non-interest income:
                         
Service charges and other income  1,997   1,806   2,449   2,209   2,152 
Net gain (loss) on securities and real estate transactions  574   26   73   (265  11 
Total non-interest income  2,571   1,832   2,522   1,944   2,163 
Total non-interest expense  8,417   8,010   10,689   10,410   10,572 
Income before income taxes  3,951   3,359   4,574   4,301   4,662 
Income taxes  1,272   1,096   1,487   1,396   1,608 
Net income $2,679  $2,263  $3,087  $2,905  $3,054 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
 At or for the Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 At or for the Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009 2009 2008 2007
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data
                         
Performance Ratios:
                         
Basic earnings per share $0.41  $0.34  $0.47  $0.42  $0.39 
Diluted earnings per share $0.41  $0.34  $0.47  $0.41  $0.39 
Return on average assets  1.09  0.90  0.92  0.89  1.00
Return on average equity  5.97  5.14  5.27  4.47  4.14
Net interest rate spread (tax equivalent)  4.29  3.83  3.85  3.90  4.06
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)  4.61  4.23  4.24  4.40  4.74
Non-interest expense to average assets  3.43  3.19  3.18  3.18  3.45
Efficiency ratio(1)  68.23  69.33  68.95  68.04  68.99
Average interest earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities  131.33  128.25  128.39  130.86  139.84
Capital Ratios:
                        ��
Average equity to average
assets
  18.27  17.56  17.46  19.84  24.09
Equity to total assets at end of period  18.64  17.81  18.30  17.86  21.70
Book value per share $9.12  $8.75  $8.88  $8.55  $8.86 
Regulatory Capital Ratios:
                         
Core capital (Tier 1 capital)(2)  17.25  15.58  16.27  17.15  20.24
Total risk-based capital(2)  23.78  22.51  23.04  24.45  27.73
Asset Quality Ratios:
                         
Nonperforming loans as percent of loans  0.75  0.62  0.67  0.42  0.35
Nonperforming assets as percent of total assets  0.62  0.53  0.58  0.47  0.35
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans  0.93  0.72  0.74  0.64  0.68
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans  125.2  115.9  111.4  152.1  190.4
Other Data:
                         
Number of:
                         
Deposit accounts  34,253   34,968   34,618   35,159   35,484 
Full service offices  5   5   5   5   5 

(1)Non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income, the tax equivalent adjustment on tax-exempt municipal securities and other non-interest income.
(2)Net income (loss) divided by average total assets.
(3)Net income (loss) divided by average total equity.
(4)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets for the year.
(6)The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense for the year less expenses related to the amortization of intangibles divided by the sum of net interest income (before loan loss provision) plus non-interest income (excluding net gains or losses on the sale or impairment of securities).
(7)Ratios are as of the end of the year.
(2)Regulatory capital ratios are computed for

n/a = Not Applicable


TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ROME AND LEGACY MERGERS

The Rome Savings Bank.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA

The following table summarizes selected information about Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s and Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s diluted income per common share, dividends per share and book value per share, and similar information giving effect to the merger (which we refer to as “pro forma” information).

The date in the table should be read together with the financial information and the financial statements of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. incorporated by reference or included in this proxy statement/prospectus. The pro forma per share data or combined results of operations per share data is presented as an illustration only. The data does not necessarily indicate the combined financial position per share or combined results of operations per share that would have been reported if the merger had occurred when indicated, nor is the data a forecast of the combined financial position or combined results of operations for any future period. No pro forma adjustments have been included herein which reflect potential effects of merger integration expenses, cost savings or operational synergies which may be obtained by combining the operations of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc., or the costs of combining the companies and their operations.

    
 Berkshire Hills
Bancorp, Inc.
Historical
 Rome Bancorp,
Inc. Historical
 Pro Forma
Combined(1)(2)(3)
 Pro Forma Rome
Bancorp, Inc.
Equivalent Shares
Book value per share:
                    
At September 30, 2010 $27.28  $9.12  $26.10  $14.77 
At December 31, 2009 $27.64  $8.88  $26.29  $14.87 
Cash dividends declared per share:
                    
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 $0.48  $0.27  $0.48  $0.27 
Year ended December 31, 2009 $0.64  $0.34  $0.64  $0.36 
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
                    
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 $0.73  $0.41  $0.79  $0.45 
Year ended December 31, 2009 $(1.52 $0.47  $(1.06 $(0.60

(1)Pro forma dividends per share represent Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s historical dividends per share.
(2)Theunaudited pro forma combined book value per sharecondensed consolidated financial information has been prepared using the acquisition method of accounting, giving effect to the merger of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is based onwith Rome and the proposed merger with Legacy. The unaudited pro forma combined common stockholders’ equity forcondensed consolidated statement of financial condition combines the historical financial information of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc.Rome, and Rome Bancorp, Inc. divided by totalLegacy as of December 31, 2010 and assumes that the mergers were completed on that date. The unaudited pro forma common sharescombined condensed consolidated statements of operations combine the historical financial information of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy and give effect to the mergers as if they had been completed as of January 1, 2010. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or financial condition had the mergers been completed on the dates described above, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results of operations in future periods or the future financial position of the combined entities. The financial information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Consolidated Financial Information. Certain reclassifications have been made to Rome's and Legacy’s historical financial information in order to conform to Berkshire Hills' presentation of financial information.

The actual value of Berkshire Hills common stock to be recorded as consideration in these mergers will be based on the closing price of Berkshire Hills common stock at the time of the merger completion dates. The merger with Rome was completed prior to the start of business on April 1, 2011; the closing price of Berkshire Hills’ stock on March 31, 2011 was $20.83, and that price was used to value Berkshire Hills’ stock. The proposed merger with Legacy is targeted for completion in the third quarter of 2011. There can be no assurance that the Legacy merger will be completed as anticipated. For purposes of the pro forma financial information, the fair value of Berkshire Hills common stock to be issued in connection with the Legacy merger was based on the $20.75 average closing price of the stock for the ten day period ending December 15, 2010, which was shortly prior to the date of the execution of the Agreement and Plan of Merger on December 21, 2010.

The pro forma financial information includes estimated adjustments, including adjustments to record assets and liabilities of Rome and Legacy at their respective fair values and represents the pro forma estimates by Berkshire Hills based on available fair value information as of the dates of the respective Agreements and Plans of Merger. In some cases, where noted, more recent information has been used to support estimated adjustments in the pro forma financial information.

The pro forma adjustments included herein are subject to change depending on changes in interest rates and the components of assets and liabilities and as additional information becomes available and additional analyses are performed. The final allocation of the purchase price for each merger will be determined after each merger is completed and after completion of thorough analyses to determine the fair value of Rome’s and Legacy’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities as of the dates the mergers are completed. Increases or decreases in the estimated fair values of the net assets as compared with the information shown in the unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information may change the amount of the purchase price allocated to goodwill and other assets and liabilities and may impact Berkshire Hills’ statement of operations due to adjustments in yield and/or amortization of the adjusted assets or liabilities. Any changes to Rome’s or Legacy’s stockholders’ equity, including results of operations from December 31, 2010 through the dates the mergers are completed, will also change the purchase price allocation, which may include the recording of a lower or higher amount of goodwill. The final adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments presented herein.

Berkshire Hills anticipates that the mergers with Rome and Legacy will provide the combined company with financial benefits that include reduced operating expenses. Berkshire Hills expects to realize cost savings approximating 35% of the anticipated non-interest expense of Rome and approximating 42% of the anticipated non-interest expense of Legacy These cost savings are not included in these pro forma statements and there can be no assurance that expected cost savings will be realized. The pro forma information, while helpful in illustrating the financial characteristics of the combined company under one set of assumptions, does not reflect the benefits of expected cost savings or opportunities to earn additional revenue and, accordingly, does


TABLE OF CONTENTS

not attempt to predict or suggest future results. It also does not necessarily reflect what the historical results of the combined company would have been had our companies been combined during these periods.

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy, which are incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference. See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 96.

The unaudited pro forma stockholders’ equity and net income are qualified by the statements set forth under this caption and should not be considered indicative of the market value of Berkshire Hills common stock or the actual or future results of operations of Berkshire Hills for any period. Actual results may be materially different than the pro forma information presented.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
As of December 31, 2010

         
         
  Rome Merger  Legacy Merger  Legacy
Deposit
 Pro Forma
Combined
Berkshire/
Rome/Legacy
w/Divest
(In thousands) Berkshire Rome Pro Forma
Merger
Adjustments
 Berkshire/
Rome
Pro Forma
 Legacy Pro Forma
Merger
Adjustments
 Berkshire/
Rome/
Legacy
Pro Forma
 Divestiture
Pro Forma
Amount
Divested(16)
Assets
                                             
Cash and cash equivalents $44,140  $18,805  $(6,986)(1)  $55,959  $27,092  $(9,253)(1)  $73,798  $3,300  $77,098 
Securities  405,953   17,871   (22,077)(2)   401,747   202,331   (21,950)(2)   582,128   (40,000  542,128 
Total loans  2,142,162   269,347   (5,239)(3)   2,406,270   616,112   (22,300)(3)   3,000,082   (120,000  2,880,082 
Less: Allowance for loan losses  (31,898  (2,490  2,595(3)   (31,793  (9,010  9,375(3)   (31,428     (31,428
Net loans  2,110,264   266,857   (2,644  2,374,477   607,102   (12,925  2,968,654   (120,000  2,848,654 
Goodwill  161,725      14,364(4)   176,089   11,558   10,808(4)   198,455      198,455 
Other identifiable intangible assets  11,354      5,208(5)   16,562   3,625   14,923(5)   35,110   (3,600  31,510 
Total intangible assets  173,079      19,572   192,651   15,183   25,731   233,565   (3,600  229,965 
Other assets  147,280   23,678   1,771(6)   172,729   65,169   10,046(6)   247,944   (500  247,444 
Total assets $2,880,716  $327,211  $(10,364 $3,197,563  $916,877  $(8,351 $4,106,089  $(160,800 $3,945,289 
Liabilities
                                             
Total deposits $2,204,441  $225,325  $528(7)  $2,430,294  $685,245  $5,207(7)  $3,120,746   (162,000  2,958,746 
Total borrowings  260,301   35,661   1,397(8)   297,359   110,717   11,442(8)   419,518      419,518 
Other liabilities  28,014   5,570      33,584   9,356      42,940      42,940 
Total liabilities  2,492,756   266,556   1,925   2,761,237   805,318   16,649   3,583,204   (162,000  3,421,204 
Total stockholders' equity  387,960   60,655   (12,289)(9)   436,326   111,559   (25,000)(9)   522,885   1,200   524,085 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $2,880,716  $327,211  $(10,364 $3,197,563  $916,877  $(8,351 $4,106,089  $(160,800 $3,945,289 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010

         
         
  Rome Merger  Legacy Merger Pro forma
Combined
Berkshire/
Rome/Legacy
 Legacy
Deposit
 Pro Forma
Combined
Berkshire/
Rome/Legacy
w/Divest
(In thousands, except
per share data)
 Berkshire
Historical
 Rome
Historical
 Pro forma
Merger
Adjustments
 Pro forma
Combined
Berkshire/
Rome
 Legacy
Historical
 Pro forma
Merger
Adjustments
 Divestiture
Pro forma
Amount
Divested(16)
Interest and dividend income
                                             
Loans $98,359  $15,968  $612(10)  $114,939  $36,014  $2,128(10)  $153,081  $(7,200 $145,881 
Securities and other  13,918   719   (194)(10)   14,443   4,950   (10)   19,393   (1,200  18,193 
Total interest and
dividend income
  112,277   16,687   418   129,382   40,964   2,128   172,474   (8,400  164,074 
Interest expense
                                             
Deposits  26,316   1,826   (352)(10)   27,790   8,928   (4,166)(10)   32,552   (1,782  30,770 
Borrowings  9,014   1,191   (698)(10)   9,507   5,630   (4,577)(10)   10,560      10,560 
Total interest expense  35,330   3,017   (1,050  37,297   14,558   (8,743  43,112   (1,782  41,330 
Net interest income  76,947   13,670   1,468   92,085   26,406   10,871   129,362   (6,618  122,744 
Total non-interest
income
  31,159   3,350   (11)   34,509   3,193   (11)   37,702   (324  37,378 
Total net revenue  108,106   17,020   1,468   126,594   29,599   10,871   167,064   (6,942  160,122 
Provision for loan losses  8,526   1,796   (12)   10,322   10,468   (12)   20,790      20,790 
Total non-interest
expense
  81,729   11,861   1,490(13)   95,080   31,043   3,355(13)   129,478   (1,782  127,696 
Income (loss) before
income taxes
  17,851   3,363   (22  21,192   (11,912  7,516   16,796   (5,160  11,636 
Income tax expense (benefit)  4,113   1,102   (9)(14)   5,206   (4,016  3,119(14)   4,309   (2,141  2,168 
Net income (loss) $13,738  $2,261  $(13 $15,986  $(7,896 $4,397  $12,487  $(3,019 $9,468 
Earnings (loss) per common share:
                                             
Basic $0.99  $0.35       $0.97  $(0.99      $0.60       $0.45 
Diluted $0.99  $0.35       $0.97  $(0.99      $0.60       $0.45 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                                             
Basic  13,862   6,523   (3,926)(15)   16,459   7,990   (3,639)(15)   20,810      20,810 
Diluted  13,896   6,523   (3,926)(15)   16,493   7,990   (3,639)(15)   20,844      20,844 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Note A — Basis of Presentation

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information and explanatory notes show the impact on the historical financial condition and income of Berkshire Hills resulting from the Rome merger and the proposed Legacy merger under the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of Rome and Legacy are recorded by Berkshire Hills at their respective fair values as of the date each merger is completed. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated statement of financial condition combines the historical financial information of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy as of December 31, 2010, and assumes that the mergers were completed on that date. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated statement of operations gives effect to the Rome merger and the proposed Legacy merger as if both mergers had been completed on January 1, 2010.

As the mergers are recorded using the acquisition method of accounting, all loans are recorded at fair value, including adjustments for credit, and no allowance for loan losses is carried over to Berkshire Hills’ statement of financial condition. In addition, certain anticipated nonrecurring costs associated with the mergers such as severance, professional fees, legal fees, and conversion related expenditures are not reflected in the pro forma statements of operations.

While the recording of the acquired loans at their fair value will impact the prospective determination of the provision for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses, for purposes of the unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010, we assumed no adjustments to the historical amount of Rome’s or Legacy’s provision for loan losses. If such adjustments were estimated, there could be a reduction, which could be significant, to the historical amounts of Rome’s or Legacy’s provision for loan losses presented.

Note B — Accounting Policies and Financial Statement Classifications

The accounting policies of Rome and Legacy are in the process of being reviewed in detail by Berkshire Hills. On completion of such review, conforming adjustments or financial statement reclassifications may be determined.

Note C — Merger and Acquisition Integration Costs

The plans to integrate the operations of Berkshire Hills with those of Rome and Legacy are still being developed. The specific details of these plans will continue to be refined over the next several months, and will include assessing personnel, benefit plans, premises, equipment, and service contracts to determine where there may be potential advantage in eliminating redundancies. Certain decisions arising from these assessments may involve involuntary termination of employees, vacating leased premises, changing information systems, canceling contracts with certain service providers and selling or otherwise disposing of certain premises, furniture and equipment. Berkshire Hills expects to incur merger related costs including professional fees, legal fees, system conversion costs, and costs related to communications with customers and others. To the extent there are costs associated with these actions, the costs will be recorded based on the nature of the cost and timing of these integration actions.

Note D — Estimated Annual Cost Savings

Berkshire Hills expects to realize annualized cost savings of approximately $3.8 million (35%) of Rome’s expected non-interest expense and $11.1 million (42%) of Legacy’s expected non-interest expenses following the mergers. Berkshire Hills expects to achieve approximately 75% of the anticipated annualized savings related to Rome in 2011 and 100% of the anticipated annualized savings thereafter. Berkshire Hills expects to achieve approximately 25% of the anticipated annualized savings related to Legacy in 2011 and 100% of the anticipated annualized savings thereafter. These cost savings are not reflected in the pro forma financial information and there can be no assurance they will be achieved in the amount or manner currently contemplated.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Note E — Divestiture of Deposits of Legacy

The merger with Legacy is expected to require a divestiture of deposits in order to satisfy federal regulations. The actual amount of the deposits to be divested (if any) will be determined by federal regulatory authorities during the merger approval process. The pro forma statement of financial condition includes estimated adjustments to reflect the impact of the deposit divestiture. Berkshire Hills anticipates that $162 million in deposits will be divested through the sale of certain Legacy branches. Berkshire Hills also expects to sell $120 million in loans and $40 million in securities, along with $2 million in other assets. It is estimated that the deposits would be sold at a 3.5% premium and that the loans would be sold at par. Net of the writedown of the related core deposit intangible asset, it is estimated that a net after-tax gain of $1.2 million will be recorded as a result of the divestiture. This gain is recorded in the pro forma statement of financial condition as an adjustment to equity. The divestiture would reduce annualized interest income at an assumed amount equivalent to approximately 6.0% of the sold loans and 3.0% of the divested investment securities. Interest expense is assumed to be reduced by approximately 1.10% of the divested deposits. Non-interest income is assumed to decrease by approximately 0.2% of the divested deposits, and non-interest expense is assumed to decrease by approximately 1.1% of the divested deposits. The resulting annualized anticipated reduction in income would approximate $5.2 million on a pre-tax basis and $3.0 million after tax. These impacts on operating income have been separately included in the pro forma income statement. Actual divestiture amounts and related impacts may differ from those contemplated herein.

Note F — Pro Forma Adjustments

The following pro forma adjustments have been reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information. All adjustments are based on current assumptions and valuations, which are subject to change.

1)The adjustment results from the assumption that cash and cash equivalents will be used to pay for after tax one-time merger and integration expenses which will be expensed against income. Those estimated amounts total $5.7 million and $12.2 million for Rome and Legacy, respectively. The cash adjustment also includes capital expenditures which are directly related to the mergers, totaling $1.2 million for Rome and $3.0 million for Legacy, including information technology equipment along with furniture and fixtures related to the facilities consolidations.

The actual one-time expenses charged against income will be charged in some cases against the income of the acquired banks and in some cases against Berkshire Hills’ income. The allocation of these amounts has not yet been fully determined. In these pro forma financial statements, it is assumed that all such expenses will be recorded against Berkshire Hills’ income, and they are represented as a pro forma charge against equity on the merger date. Those expenses which are actually charged against income of the acquired banks will result in a charge to goodwill, rather than to Berkshire Hills’ equity.

Most of the adjustments in these pro forma financial statements were based on due diligence analysis performed by Berkshire Hills on the financial condition of Rome and Legacy based on information in the third and fourth quarters of 2010. All three of the companies recorded certain charges in the fourth quarter of 2010 which included amounts which were contained in the assumptions supporting adjustments to the pro forma financial statements. In addition to one-time merger related expenses, these amounts included loan loss provisions, securities writedowns, and borrowings prepayment penalties. The total amount of these net charges was estimated at $6.0 million after-tax. In order to avoid double counting these amounts, a $6.0 million credit to equity and debit to cash is included among the pro forma adjustments in the pro forma statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2010.

2)The cash component of merger consideration is assumed to be funded by the sale of investment securities. This adjustment is partially offset by an estimated fair value adjustment to investment securities. For the Rome merger, the sale of securities for merger consideration totaled $22.5 million

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Note F — Pro Forma Adjustments  – (continued)

which is partially offset by an expected $0.6 million premium to be recorded to the fair value of investment securities. For the Legacy merger, the expected sale of securities for merger consideration totals $11.3 million, and in addition there was a $7.0 million expected credit related discount to be recorded to the fair value of investment securities related to equity investments in commercial real estate related securities. Also, securities investments are reduced by the $3.6 million book value of 391,600 Legacy common shares previously purchased by Berkshire Hills, which will be cancelled under the terms of the merger agreement and which are accounted for as merger consideration. Berkshire Hills additionally owned 59,000 shares of Rome common stock, which were cancelled under the terms of the merger agreement. The financial impact of this Rome common stock was viewed as immaterial and was not included as an adjustment to the pro forma financial statements. Berkshire Hills shares issued have been adjusted to reflect the cancellation of these shares.
3)Represents the estimated fair value adjustment to loans, which includes an estimate of credit losses. Accordingly, the existing Rome and Legacy allowances for loan losses cannot be carried over. The estimated fair value adjustment to loans for Rome includes a discount of $4.1 million for estimated impacts of loan credit risk and potential loan losses. The estimated fair value adjustment to loans for Legacy includes a fair value discount of $17.0 million for estimated impacts of loan credit risk and potential loan losses.
4)Represents adjustments to goodwill resulting from recording the assets and liabilities of Rome and Legacy at fair value. These adjustments are preliminary and are subject to change. The final adjustments will be calculated when the Rome merger analysis and the Legacy merger are completed, and may be materially different than those presented here. The excess of consideration paid over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill and is summarized for Rome and Legacy in Note F-9.
5)Represents the elimination of existing identifiable intangibles of Legacy, offset by the recognition of the fair value of the core deposit intangible asset, which is assumed to be 2.5% of core deposit liabilities assumed. Core deposits are defined as total deposits less time deposits over $100,000. Rome has no existing identifiable intangible assets. Its core deposits were measured at $208.3 million as of December 31, 2010, net of $17.0 million in jumbo time deposits. For Legacy, core deposits) were measured at $549.9 million as of December 31, 2010, net of $135.3 million in jumbo time deposits. Also, an amount of $4.8 million was assigned as the value of identifiable intangible assets in the form of wealth management customer lists.
6)Includes adjustment for the fair value of net premises and equipment. This adjustment is a premium of $1.2 million for Rome and $7.0 million for Legacy. Also includes adjustments in the net deferred tax assets resulting from the fair value adjustments related to the acquired assets and liabilities, identifiable intangibles, and other deferred tax items. The actual tax asset adjustments will depend on facts and circumstances existing at the completion of the mergers. Also includes anticipated capital expenditures as discussed in Note F-1 and other adjusting items.
7)Represents the estimated fair value adjustment to certificate of deposit liabilities.
8)Represents the estimated fair value adjustment to borrowings.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Note F — Pro Forma Adjustments  – (continued)

9)The actual equity adjustment is based on the $20.83 closing price of Berkshire Hills common stock as of March 31, 2011 for the Rome acquisition and will be based on the fair value of Berkshire Hills common stock on the date that the Legacy merger closes, which could be materially different from the amount presented here. A summary of the net impact of adjustments to stockholders’ equity and goodwill for Rome and Legacy is as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):

 
Equity and Goodwill Adjustment Detail For Rome:
     
Equity adjustment
     
Fair value of Berkshire Hills common shares issued $54,099(a) 
Elimination of Rome stockholders’ equity  (60,655
After tax integration expenses charged against cash and equivalents  (5,733
Total stockholders’ equity adjustment $(12,289
Goodwill adjustment
     
Fair value of Berkshire Hills common shares issued for Rome common shares $54,099(a) 
Cash payments to Rome stockholders  22,132(b) 
Value of Rome options  354(c) 
Total consideration $76,585 
Carrying value of Rome net assets at December 31, 2010 $60,655 
Fair value adjustments (debit/(credit))
     
Investment securities  583 
Loans, net  (2,644
Other identifiable intangible assets – core deposit intangible  5,208 
Certificates of deposit  (528
Borrowings  (1,396
Other assets  1,200 
Net adjustments to deferred tax assets  (857
Total fair value adjustments  1,566 
Fair value of net assets acquired at December 31, 2010  62,221 
Excess of consideration paid over fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill)  14,364 
Elimination of Rome goodwill   
Net goodwill adjustment $14,364 

(a)Berkshire Hills common stock issued to Rome stockholders is calculated as follows:

 
Rome common shares outstanding as of April 1, 2011
     
Issued  9,896 
Less treasury shares  (3,118
Less unallocated ESOP shares repurchased to treasury to repay ESOP loan  (161
Less Rome shares owned by Berkshire Hills cancelled per merger agreement  (59
Outstanding Rome shares exchanged for Berkshire Hills consideration  6,558 
Stock portion of consideration  70
Outstanding Rome shares exchanged for Berkshire Hills stock consideration  4,590 
Multiplied by exchange ratio  0.5658 
Berkshire Hills common shares issued to Rome shareholders  2,597 
Closing price per share of Berkshire Hills stock on March 31, 2011 $20.83 
Fair value of Berkshire Hills common shares issued for Rome common shares $54,099 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Note F — Pro Forma Adjustments  – (continued)

(b)The cash portion of the consideration to stockholders is calculated as follows:

 
Outstanding Rome shares exchanged for Berkshire Hills consideration  6,558 
Cash portion of consideration  30
Outstanding Rome shares exchanged for Berkshire Hills cash consideration  1,967 
Cash value per share exchanged $11.25 
Total cash consideration for Rome common shares $22,132 
(c)Under the terms of the merger agreement, all of the 354,000 options for Rome stock are exchanged for cash at $1.00 per share.

 
Equity and Goodwill Adjustment Detail For Legacy:
     
Equity adjustment
     
Fair value of Berkshire Hills common shares to be issued $90,288(a) 
Fair value of Legacy stock options converted to Berkshire Hills options  1,070(c) 
Gain on Legacy stock owned by Berkshire Hills, recorded in income  1,451(d) 
Elimination of Legacy stockholders’ equity  (111,559
After tax integration expenses charged against cash and equivalents  (12,250
After tax adjustment for total pro formed charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2010  6,000 
Total stockholders’ equity adjustment $(25,000
Goodwill adjustment
     
Fair value of Berkshire Hills common shares to be issued $90,288(a) 
Cash payments to Legacy stockholders  10,032(b) 
Fair value of Legacy stock options converted to Berkshire Hills options  1,070(c) 
Cash payments for Legacy stock options being canceled  1,269(c) 
Cost of Legacy shares previously purchased by Berkshire Hills  3,640(d) 
Gain on Legacy stock owned by Berkshire Hills, recorded in income  1,451(d) 
Total consideration $107,750 
Carrying value of Legacy net assets at December 31, 2010 $111,559 
Fair value adjustments (debit/(credit))
     
Write off of Legacy goodwill  (11,558
Write off of Legacy other identifiable intangibles  (3,625
Investment securities  (7,000
Loans, net  (12,925
Other identifiable intangible assets  18,548 
Certificates of deposit  (5,207
Borrowings  (11,442
Other assets  7,000 
Net adjustments to deferred tax assets  34 
Total fair value adjustments  (26,175
Fair value of net assets acquired at December 31, 2010 $85,384 
Excess of consideration paid over fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) $22,366 
Elimination of Legacy goodwill  (11,558
Net goodwill adjustment $10,808 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Note F — Pro Forma Adjustments  – (continued)

(a)Berkshire Hills common stock issued for Legacy is calculated as follows:

 
Legacy common shares outstanding as of December 31, 2010
     
Issued  10,309 
Less treasury shares  (1,677
Less pro forma unallocated ESOP shares to be rescinded as a result of the merger  (523
Less Legacy shares owned by Berkshire Hills  (392
Pro forma outstanding Legacy shares to be exchanged for Berkshire Hills consideration  7,717 
Multiplied by exchange ratio  0.56385 
Berkshire Hills common shares to be issued  4,351 
Average closing price per share of Berkshire Hills stock for ten days ended December 15, 2010 $20.75 
Fair value of Berkshire Hills common shares to be issued $90,288 
(b)The cash portion of the merger consideration is calculated as follows:

 
Pro forma outstanding Legacy shares to be exchanged for Berkshire Hills consideration  7,717 
Cash consideration per share of outstanding Legacy shares $1.30 
Total cash consideration $10,032 
(c)Under the terms of the merger agreement, 422,900 of the out-of-the money stock options are exchanged for cash at $3.00 per share. The remaining 312,810 options automatically vest and convert into options of Berkshire Hills stock with the same remaining term. Each Legacy share option converts into 0.6265 Berkshire Hills share option at an exercise price equal to the Legacy price divided by 0.6265. These new Berkshire Hills options were valued at $5.46 per share based on the Black Scholes model, resulting in a total consideration value of $1.1 million.
(d)Berkshire Hills purchased 391,600 shares of Legacy common stock prior to negotiating the merger. The $3.6 million cost basis of this stock is accounted for as an element of consideration in determining goodwill. The $1.5 million estimated gain will be recorded in income and is therefore credited as an adjustment to equity (there is no tax offset due to capital loss carryforwards).
10)Includes the amortization/accretion of fair value adjustments related to loans, investment securities, deposits and borrowings utilizing the sum of the years digits method over the estimated lives of the related asset or liability, excluding any adjustments related to estimated loan credit losses. For Rome, estimated lives are 5 – 7 years for loans, 5 years for investment securities, 2 years for deposits, and 3 years for borrowings. Legacy estimated lives are 4.7 years for loans, 1.5 years for deposits, and 4 years for borrowings. For both mergers, there is no adjustment to pro forma investment income to exclude interest income foregone on securities sold. It is anticipated that there will a reduction of interest income approximately equivalent to the loss of a 4% yield on investment securities sold. There is no accretion projected for the credit related Legacy securities discount.
11)Non-interest income does not reflect revenue enhancement opportunities. It also does not reflect the $1.5 million gain expected on the existing Legacy shares currently owned by Berkshire Hills. The latter gain is reflected in the Legacy merger adjustments related to goodwill and equity in the pro forma balance sheet.
12)See Note G below.
13)Adjustments to non-interest expense consist primarily of amortization of the identifiable intangible assets over an eight year life using the sum of the years digits method. Additionally, the adjustments include straight line depreciation of capital expenditures directly related to the merger; this annual

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Note F — Pro Forma Adjustments  – (continued)

depreciation is $280 thousand for Rome and $450 thousand for Legacy. The adjustments also include additional depreciation expense for the amortization of the fixed asset fair value premiums, totaling $60 thousand per year for Rome and $400 thousand for Legacy. Non-interest expenses do not reflect anticipated cost savings, which are estimated at 35% of total non-interest expenses for Rome and 42% for Legacy. Non-interest expenses also do not include one-time merger and integration expenses which will be expensed against income and which are accounted for as balance sheet adjustments to cash and equity in these pro forma financial statements. Those amounts, on an after-tax basis, total $5.7 million and $12.2 million for Rome and Legacy, respectively. See note 1 for additional discussion of merger related expenses.
14)Reflects the tax impact of the pro forma merger adjustments at Berkshire Hills’ statutory income tax rate of 41.5%.
15)Adjustment reflects the elimination of Rome and Legacy weighted average shares outstanding, offset by the shares issued in connection with the Rome merger and expected to be issued in connection with the Legacy merger. Unallocated Rome ESOP shares totaling 161 thousand shares were repurchased into treasury by Rome prior to the merger in order to satisfy the outstanding Rome ESOP loan. Based on the Legacy merger agreement, it is expected that 523 thousand in unallocated Legacy ESOP shares will be cancelled in satisfaction of the outstanding loan used to purchase such shares, and are, therefore, not included in the number of pro forma Berkshire Hills combined outstanding common shares at December 31, 2010. Similarly, it is expected that the 392 thousand shares of Legacy presently owned by Berkshire Hills will be canceled, and they are not included in pro forma combined Berkshire Hills common shares outstanding. Additionally the 59 thousand Rome shares previously owned by Berkshire Hills were canceled, and they are not included in pro forma combined Berkshire Hills common shares outstanding.
16)See Note E above.

Note G — Effect of Hypothetical Adjustments on Rome’s and Legacy’s Historical Financial Statements

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated statement of operations presents the pro forma results assuming both the Rome and Legacy mergers occurred on January 1, 2010. As required by Regulation S-X Article 11, the pro forma statement of operations does not reflect any adjustments to eliminate Rome’s or Legacy’s historical provision for credit losses.

Both Rome’s and Legacy’s provision for credit losses for the periods presented relate to loans that Berkshire Hills is required to initially record at fair value. Such fair value adjustments include a component related to the expected credit losses on those loan portfolios. Berkshire Hills believes that these provisions would not have been recorded in Berkshire Hills’ combined consolidated financial statements for the periods presented had the mergers been completed on January 1, 2010.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPARATIVE PRO FORMA PER SHARE DATA

The following table summarizes selected share and per share information about Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy giving effect to the mergers (which we refer to as “pro forma” information). The data in the table should be read together with the financial information and the financial statements of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy incorporated by reference or included in this proxy statement/prospectus. The pro forma information is presented as an illustration only. The data does not necessarily indicate the combined financial position per share or combined results of operations per share that would have been reported if the mergers had occurred when indicated, nor is the data a forecast of the combined financial position or combined results of operations for any future period.

The information about book value per share and shares outstanding assumes that the mergers took place as of December 31, 2010 and is based on the assumptions set forth in the preceding unaudited pro forma combined consolidated statements of financial condition. The information about dividends and earnings per share assumes that the mergers took place as of January 1, 2010 and is based on the assumptions set forth in the preceding unaudited pro forma combined consolidated statements of operations. No pro forma adjustments have been included in these statements of operations which reflect potential effects of the mergers related to integration expenses, cost savings or operational synergies which are expected to be obtained by combining the operations of Berkshire Hills, Rome, and Legacy, or the costs of combining the companies and their operations. It is further assumed that Berkshire Hills will pay a cash dividend after the completion of the merger at the annual rate of $0.64 per share. The actual payment of dividends is subject to numerous factors, and no assurance can be given that Berkshire Hills will pay dividends following the completion of the merger or that dividends will not be reduced in the future.

      
      
(Shares and Stockholders' Equity in thousands) Berkshire Rome Berkshire/Rome
Pro Forma
Combined
 Legacy Berkshire/Rome/
Legacy
w/divestiture
Pro Forma
Combined
 Pro Forma
Legacy
Equivalent Shares
Book value per share:
                              
December 31, 2010 $27.56  $8.95  $26.17  $12.92  $24.93  $14.06 
Cash dividends paid per common share:
                              
Year ended December 31, 2010 $0.64  $0.36  $0.64  $0.20  $0.64  $0.36 
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations:
                              
Year ended December 31, 2010 $0.99  $0.35  $0.97  $(0.99 $0.45  $0.25 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations:
                              
Year ended December 31, 2010 $0.99  $0.35  $0.97  $(0.99 $0.45  $0.25 
Note:
                              
Shares outstanding:
                              
December 31, 2010  14,076   6,778   16,673   8,632   21,024      
Stockholders' Equity
                              
December 31, 2010 $387,960  $60,655  $436,326  $111,559  $524,085      

(1)Pro forma dividends per share represent Berkshire Hills’ historical dividends per share.
(2)The pro forma combined book value per share of Berkshire Hills common stock is based on the pro forma combined common stockholders’ equity for the merged entities divided by total pro forma common shares of the combined entities.
(3)The pro forma combined diluted net income per share of Berkshire Hills common stock is based on the pro forma combined diluted net income for the merged entities divided by total pro forma diluted common shares of the combined entities.
(4)The Pro Forma Legacy Equivalent Shares are calculated by multiplying the amounts in the Berkshire Hills/Rome/Legacy with Divestiture Pro Forma Combined Column by the 0.56385 exchange ratio, which represents the number of shares of Berkshire Hills common stock a Legacy stockholder will receive for each share of Legacy stock owned.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

Berkshire Hills common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BHLB.” Legacy common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “LEGC.” The following table lists the high and low prices per share for Berkshire Hills common stock and Legacy common stock and the cash dividends declared by each company for the periods indicated.

      
 Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock
 Legacy Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock
   High Low Dividends High Low Dividends
Quarter Ended
                              
March 31, 2011 $22.92  $20.68  $    $13.75  $12.61  $0.05 
December 31, 2010 $22.49  $17.90  $0.16  $13.14  $7.49  $0.05 
September 30, 2010 $20.94  $17.08  $0.16  $8.91  $7.55  $0.05 
June 30, 2010 $22.84  $16.81  $0.16  $9.73  $8.24  $0.05 
March 31, 2010 $20.99  $16.20  $0.16  $9.98  $9.01  $0.05 
December 31, 2009 $22.85  $18.05  $0.16  $11.07  $9.40  $0.05 
September 30, 2009 $24.88  $19.92  $0.16  $13.46  $10.50  $0.05 
June 30, 2009 $26.99  $19.87  $0.16  $12.10  $9.29  $0.05 
March 31, 2009 $31.39  $18.46  $0.16  $11.21  $7.90  $0.05 

You should obtain current market quotations for Berkshire Hills and Legacy common stock, as the market price of Berkshire Hills common stock will fluctuate between the date of this document and the date on which the Merger is completed, and thereafter. You can get these quotations from a newspaper, on the Internet or by calling your broker.

As of [Record Date], there were approximately holders of record of Berkshire Hills common stock. As of [Record Date], there were approximately holders of record of Legacy common stock. These numbers do not reflect the number of persons or entities who may hold their stock in nominee or “street name” through brokerage firms.

Following the Merger, the declaration of dividends will be at the discretion of Berkshire Hills’ board of directors and will be determined after consideration of various factors, including earnings, cash requirements, the financial condition of Berkshire Hills, applicable state law and government regulations and other factors deemed relevant by Berkshire Hills’ board of directors.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIAL MEETING OF LEGACY BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS

Date, Place, Time and Purpose

Legacy’s board of directors is sending you this document to request that you allow your shares of Legacy to be represented at the special meeting by the persons named in the enclosed proxy card. At the special meeting, the Legacy board of directors will ask you to vote on a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. You may also be asked to vote to adjourn the special meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve the Merger Agreement. The special meeting will be held at, Pittsfield, Massachusetts at 5:30 p.m., local time, on [Date].

Who Can Vote at the Meeting

You are entitled to vote if the records of Legacy showed that you held shares of Legacy common stock as of the close of business on [Record Date]. As of the close of business on that date, a total of shares of Legacy common stock were outstanding. Each share of common stock has one vote. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Legacy common stock held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”) and you want to vote your shares in person at the meeting, you will have to get a written proxy in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares.

Quorum; Vote Required

The special meeting will conduct business only if a majority of the outstanding shares of Legacy common stock entitled to vote is represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. If you return valid proxy instructions or attend the meeting in person, your shares will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you abstain from voting. Broker non-votes also will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares of Legacy common stock for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

Proposal 1: Approval of the Merger Agreement.  Approval of the Merger Agreement will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Legacy common stock entitled to vote at the meeting. Failure to return a properly executed proxy card or to vote in person will have the same effect as a vote against the Merger Agreement. Broker non-votes and abstentions from voting will have the same effect as voting against the Merger Agreement.

Proposal 2: Adjourn the meeting if necessary or appropriate, including an adjournment to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the Merger.  The affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast is required to approve the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.

Shares Held by Legacy Officers and Directors and by Berkshire Hills

As of [Record Date], directors and executive officers of Legacy beneficially owned shares of Legacy common stock, not including shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of stock options. This equals% of the outstanding shares of Legacy common stock. The directors and executive officers of Legacy have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the Merger at the special meeting. As of the same date, Berkshire Hills and its subsidiaries and its directors and executive officers owned  shares of Legacy common stock. This equals% of the total outstanding shares of Legacy common stock.

Voting and Revocability of Proxies

You may vote in person at the special meeting or by proxy. To ensure your representation at the special meeting, Legacy recommends that you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the special meeting. You can always change your vote at the special meeting.

Legacy stockholders whose shares are held in “street name” by their broker, bank or other nominee must follow the instructions provided by their broker, bank or other nominee to vote their shares. Your broker or bank may allow you to deliver your voting instructions via the telephone or the Internet.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Voting instructions are included on your proxy form. If you properly complete and timely submit your proxy, your shares will be voted as you have directed. You may vote for, against, or abstain with respect to the approval of the Merger Agreement and the proposal to adjourn the meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares of Legacy common stock and submit your proxy without specifying a voting instruction, your shares of Legacy common stock will be voted “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement, “FOR” the proposal to approve the Parachute Arrangements and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. Legacy’s board of directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the Merger Agreement and “FOR” approval of the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:

filing with the Secretary of Legacy a duly executed revocation of proxy;
submitting a new proxy with a later date; or
voting in person at the special meeting.

Attendance at the special meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute a revocation of a proxy. All written notices of revocation and other communication with respect to the revocation of proxies should be addressed to:

Legacy Bancorp, Inc.
Kimberly A. Mathews, Corporate Secretary and General Counsel
99 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201

If any matters not described in this document are properly presented at the special meeting, the persons named in the proxy card will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. Legacy does not know of any other matters to be presented at the meeting.

Solicitation of Proxies

Legacy will pay for this proxy solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, Phoenix Advisory Partners, LLC, a proxy solicitation firm, will assist Legacy in soliciting proxies for the special meeting. Legacy will pay $ for these services. Legacy will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. Additionally, directors, officers and employees of Legacy may solicit proxies personally and by telephone. None of these persons will receive additional or special compensation for soliciting proxies.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIAL MEETING OF BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS

Date, Place, Time and Purpose

Berkshire Hills’s board of directors is sending you this document to request that you allow your shares of Berkshire Hills to be represented at the special meeting by the persons named in the enclosed proxy card. At the special meeting, the Berkshire Hills board of directors will ask you to vote on a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. You may also be asked to vote to adjourn the special meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve the Merger Agreement. The special meeting will be held at, Pittsfield, Massachusetts at 5:30 p.m., local time, on [Date].

Who Can Vote at the Meeting

You are entitled to vote if the records of Berkshire Hills showed that you held shares of Berkshire Hills common stock as of the close of business on [Record Date]. As of the close of business on that date, a total of shares of Berkshire Hills common stock were outstanding. Each share of common stock has one vote. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Berkshire Hills common stock held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”) and you want to vote your shares in person at the meeting, you will have to get a written proxy in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares.

Quorum; Vote Required

The special meeting will conduct business only if a majority of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock entitled to vote is represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. If you return valid proxy instructions or attend the meeting in person, your shares will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you abstain from voting. Broker non-votes also will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

Proposal 1: Approval of the Merger Agreement.  Approval of the Merger Agreement will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock entitled to vote at the meeting. Failure to return a properly executed proxy card or to vote in person will have the same effect as a vote against the Merger Agreement. Broker non-votes and abstentions from voting will have the same effect as voting against the Merger Agreement.

Proposal 2: Approval of the amendment to the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation.  Under the Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware law, the amendment of Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation requires a vote “FOR” the amendment by a majority of the outstanding Common Stock entitled to vote thereof.

Proposal 3: Adjourn the meeting if necessary or appropriate, including an adjournment to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the Merger.  The affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast is required to approve the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.

Shares Held by Berkshire Hills Officers and Directors and by Berkshire Hills

As of [Record Date], directors and executive officers of Berkshire Hills beneficially owned shares of Berkshire Hills common stock, not including shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of stock options. This equals% of the outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock. The directors and executive officers of Berkshire Hills have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the Merger at the special meeting. As of the same date, Berkshire Hills and its subsidiaries and its directors and executive officers owned shares of Berkshire Hills common stock. This equals% of the total outstanding shares of Berkshire Hills common stock.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Voting and Revocability of Proxies

You may vote in person at the special meeting or by proxy. To ensure your representation at the special meeting, Berkshire Hills recommends that you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the special meeting. You can always change your vote at the special meeting.

Berkshire Hills stockholders whose shares are held in “street name” by their broker, bank or other nominee must follow the instructions provided by their broker, bank or other nominee to vote their shares. Your broker or bank may allow you to deliver your voting instructions via the telephone or the Internet.

Voting instructions are included on your proxy form. If you properly complete and timely submit your proxy, your shares will be voted as you have directed. You may vote for, against, or abstain with respect to the approval of the Merger Agreement and the proposal to adjourn the meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares of Berkshire Hills common stock and submit your proxy without specifying a voting instruction, your shares of Berkshire Hills common stock will be voted “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement, “FOR” the amendment of the Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation, and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. Berkshire Hills’s board of directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the Merger Agreement, “FOR” the amendment of the Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation, and “FOR” approval of the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:

filing with the Secretary of Berkshire Hills a duly executed revocation of proxy;
submitting a new proxy with a later date; or
voting in person at the special meeting.

Attendance at the special meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute a revocation of a proxy. All written notices of revocation and other communication with respect to the revocation of proxies should be addressed to:

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
Wm. Gordon Prescott, Corporate Secretary and General Counsel
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201

If any matters not described in this document are properly presented at the special meeting, the persons named in the proxy card will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. Berkshire Hills does not know of any other matters to be presented at the meeting.

Solicitation of Proxies

Berkshire Hills will pay for this proxy solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, Phoenix Advisory Partners, LLC, a proxy solicitation firm, will assist Berkshire Hills in soliciting proxies for the special meeting. Berkshire Hills will pay $ for these services. Berkshire Hills will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. Additionally, directors, officers and employees of Berkshire Hills may solicit proxies personally and by telephone. None of these persons will receive additional or special compensation for soliciting proxies.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

RIGHTS OF DISSENTING LEGACY BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS

Under Delaware law, holders of Legacy common stock that do not wish to accept the Merger consideration may elect to have the value of their shares of Legacy common stock judicially determined and paid in cash, together with a fair rate of interest, if any. The valuation, which could be higher or lower than, or the same as, the value of the Merger Consideration, will exclude any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger. A stockholder may only exercise such appraisal rights by complying with the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

The following summary of the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law is not a complete statement of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, a copy of which is attached to this document as Appendix D and incorporated into this summary by reference. If you wish to exercise appraisal rights or wish to preserve your right to do so, you should carefully review Section 262 and are urged to consult a legal advisor before electing or attempting to exercise these rights.

All references in Section 262 and in this summary to a “stockholder” are to the record holder of the shares of Legacy common stock as to which appraisal rights are asserted. A person having a beneficial interest in shares of Legacy common stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a bank, broker or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow properly the steps summarized below and in a timely manner to perfect appraisal rights.

Under Section 262, where a proposed merger is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, as in the case of Legacy’s special meeting, which is scheduled for[Date], the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders entitled to appraisal rights that these appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a copy of Section 262. This document constitutes notice to the Legacy stockholders of the availability of appraisal rights, and the applicable statutory provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law are attached to this document as Appendix D.

Any Legacy stockholder wishing to exercise the right to demand appraisal under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law must satisfy each of the following conditions:

The stockholder must deliver to Legacy a written demand for appraisal of its shares before the vote on the Merger Agreement at Legacy’s special meeting, which is scheduled for[Date]. This demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs Legacy of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends by that writing to demand the appraisal of its shares.
The stockholder must not vote its shares of common stock in favor of the Merger Agreement. A proxy that does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of the Merger Agreement. Therefore, a Legacy stockholder who votes by proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must vote against the Merger Agreement or affirmatively indicate on the proxy that such stockholder is abstaining from voting on the Merger Agreement. Neither voting against, abstaining from voting, or failing to vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement will constitute a written demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any failure to vote, abstention from voting, or any vote, in person or by proxy, cast against approval of the Merger.
The stockholder must continuously hold its shares from the date of making the written demand through the completion of the Merger. A stockholder who is the record holder of shares of common stock on the date the written demand for appraisal is made but who thereafter transfers those shares prior to the completion of the Merger will lose any right to appraisal in respect of those shares.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Only a stockholder of record of shares of Legacy common stock is entitled to assert appraisal rights for those shares registered in that holder’s name. A demand for appraisal should:

be executed by or on behalf of the stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as its name appears on the stock transfer records of Legacy;
specify the stockholder’s name and mailing address;
specify the number of shares of Legacy common stock owned by the stockholder; and
specify that the stockholder intends thereby to demand appraisal of its common stock.

If the shares are owned of record by a person in a fiduciary capacity, such as a trustee, guardian or custodian, the demand should be executed in that capacity. If the shares are owned of record by more than one person as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by or on behalf of all owners. An authorized agent, including an agent for two or more joint owners, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a stockholder; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for such owner or owners. A record holder such as a bank or broker who holds shares as nominee for several beneficial owners may exercise appraisal rights with respect to the shares held for one or more beneficial owners while not exercising these rights with respect to the shares held for one or more other beneficial owners. In this case, the written demand should set forth the number of shares as to which appraisal is sought, and where no number of shares is expressly mentioned the demand will be presumed to cover all shares held in the name of the record owner.

Stockholders who hold their shares in brokerage accounts or other nominee forms and who wish to exercise appraisal rights are urged to consult with their nominees to determine appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal by such nominee.

A stockholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights pursuant to Section 262 should mail or deliver a written demand to:

Legacy Bancorp, Inc.
99 North Street
P.O. Box 1148
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01202
Attention: Kimberly A. Mathews, Corporate Secretary
and General Counsel

Within ten days after the completion of the Merger, Berkshire must send a notice as to the completion of the Merger to each of Legacy’s former stockholders who has made a written demand for appraisal in accordance with Section 262 and who has not voted in favor of or consented to adoption of the Merger Agreement. Within 120 days after the completion of the Merger, but not after that date, either Berkshire or any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the shares of common stock held by all stockholders demanding appraisal of their shares. Berkshire is under no obligation to, and has no present intent to file a petition for appraisal, and stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that Berkshire Hills will file a petition or that it will initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of assetsthe shares. Accordingly, stockholders who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and liabilitiesin the manner prescribed in Section 262. Since Berkshire Hills has no obligation to file a petition, the failure of affected stockholders to do so within the period specified could nullify any previous written demand for appraisal. Under the Merger Agreement, Legacy has agreed to give Berkshire Hills prompt notice of any demands for appraisal it receives. Berkshire Hills has the right to participate in all negotiations and proceedings with respect to demands for appraisal. Legacy will not, except with the prior written consent of Berkshire Hills, make any payment with respect to any demands for appraisal, offer to settle, or settle, any demands.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Within 120 days after the completion of the Merger, any stockholder that complies with the provisions of Section 262 to that point in time will be entitled to receive from Berkshire Hills, upon written request, a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the Merger Agreement and with respect to which Legacy received demands for appraisal and the aggregate number of holders of those shares. Berkshire Hills must mail this statement to the stockholder by the later of ten days after receipt of the request or ten days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisals under Section 262.

A stockholder who timely files a petition for appraisal with the Delaware Court of Chancery must serve a copy upon Berkshire Hills. Berkshire Hills must, within 20 days of receipt of the petition, file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded appraisal of their shares and who have not reached agreements with it as to the value of their shares. After notice to stockholders as may be ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Court of Chancery is empowered to conduct a hearing on the petition to determine which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation on the certificates of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings, and if any stockholder fails to comply with the requirement, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to that stockholder. After determining what stockholders are entitled to an appraisal, the Delaware Court of Chancery will appraise the “fair value” of their shares. This value will exclude any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger, but will include a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. The costs of the action may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and taxed upon the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable. Upon application of a stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may also order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding be charged pro rata against the value of all of the shares entitled to appraisal. These expenses may include, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and the fees and expenses of experts. Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares as determined under Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than the Merger consideration they would be entitled to receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement if they did not seek appraisal of their shares. Stockholders should also be aware that investment banking opinions as to fairness from a financial point of view are not necessarily opinions as to fair value under Section 262.

In determining fair value and, if applicable, a fair rate of interest, the Delaware Court of Chancery is to take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered, and that “fair price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.”

Section 262 provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court construed Section 262 to mean that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the Merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.” Any stockholder who has duly demanded an appraisal in compliance with Section 262 will not, after the completion of the Merger, be entitled to vote the shares subject to that demand for any purpose or be entitled to the payment of dividends or other distributions on those shares. However, stockholders will be entitled to dividends or other distributions payable to holders of record of shares as of a record date prior to the completion of the Merger.

Any stockholder may withdraw its demand for appraisal and accept the Merger consideration by delivering to Berkshire Hills, within 60 days of the effective date of the Merger, a written withdrawal of the stockholder’s demands for appraisal. Any attempt to withdraw made more than 60 days after the effective date of the Merger will require written approval of Berkshire Hills. Moreover, no appraisal proceeding before the Delaware Court of Chancery as to any stockholder shall be dismissed without the approval of the Delaware


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon any terms the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just. If Berkshire Hills does not approve a stockholder’s request to withdraw a demand for appraisal when the approval is required or if the Delaware Court of Chancery does not approve the dismissal of an appraisal proceeding, the stockholder would be entitled to receive only the appraised value determined in any such appraisal proceeding. This value could be higher or lower than, or the same as, the value of the Merger consideration.

Failure to follow the steps required by Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law for perfecting appraisal rights may result in the loss of appraisal rights, in which event you will be entitled to receive the consideration with respect to your dissenting shares in accordance with the acquisition methodMerger Agreement. In view of accountingthe complexity of the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, if you are a Legacy stockholder and does notare considering exercising your appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law, you should consult your own legal advisor.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION OF THE MERGER

The following summary of the Merger Agreement is qualified by reference to the complete text of the Merger Agreement. A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached as Appendix A to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and is incorporated by reference into this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. You should read the Merger Agreement completely and carefully as it, rather than this description, is the legal document that governs the Merger.

General

The Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Legacy with and into Berkshire Hills, with Berkshire Hills as the surviving entity. Following the merger of Legacy with and into Berkshire Hills, Berkshire Hills intends to merge Legacy Banks with and into Berkshire Bank, but retains the right to hold Legacy Banks as a separate subsidiary. In connection with a merger of Legacy Banks with and into Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills may, subject to regulatory approval, include transactional coststhe “Legacy” name in the name of Berkshire Bank’s branch offices in Berkshire County, Massachusetts and may continue to do so for up to two years from the completion of the Merger or anticipated cost savings.

(3)The pro forma combined diluted net income per shareuntil such time as Berkshire Bank rebrands its banking offices in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. Berkshire Hills will designate the headquarters of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is based on the pro forma combined diluted net income forand Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. divided by total pro forma diluted common shares of the combined entities. The pro forma information includes adjustments related to the fair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting and does not include transactional costs or anticipated cost savings.

TABLE OF CONTENTSBank as 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts.

MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BHLB.” Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “ROME.” The following table lists the high and low prices per share for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock and the cash dividends declared by each company for the periods indicated.

      
 Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock
 Rome Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock
   High Low Dividends High Low Dividends
Quarter Ended
                              
December 31, 2010 (through [Record Date]) $  $  $  $  $  $ 
September 30, 2010 $20.94  $17.08  $0.16  $9.90  $8.73  $0.090 
June 30, 2010 $22.84  $16.81  $0.16  $9.95  $8.12  $0.090 
March 31, 2010 $20.99  $16.20  $0.16  $9.66  $7.61  $0.090 
December 31, 2009 $22.85  $18.05  $0.16  $8.69  $7.70  $0.085 
September 30, 2009 $24.88  $19.92  $0.16  $9.10  $7.75  $0.085 
June 30, 2009 $26.99  $19.87  $0.16  $9.70  $7.52  $0.085 
March 31, 2009 $31.39  $18.46  $0.16  $9.10  $7.00  $0.085 

You should obtain current market quotations for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, as the market price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock will fluctuate between the date of this document and the date on which the merger is completed, and thereafter. You can get these quotations from a newspaper, on the Internet or by calling your broker.

As of [Record Date], there were approximately _____ holders of record of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. As of [Record Date], there were approximately ___ holders of record of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. These numbers do not reflect the number of persons or entities who may hold their stock in nominee or “street name” through brokerage firms.

Following the merger, the declaration of dividends will be at the discretion of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors and will be determined after consideration of various factors, including earnings, cash requirements, the financial condition of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., applicable state law and government regulations and other factors deemed relevant by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIAL MEETING OF ROME BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS

Date, Place, Time and Purpose

Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors is sending you this document to request that you allow your shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. to be represented at the special meeting by the persons named in the enclosed proxy card. At the special meeting, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors will ask you to vote on a proposal to approve the merger agreement. You may also be asked to vote to adjourn the special meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve the merger agreement. The special meeting will be held at The Rome Savings Bank, 100 W. Dominick Street, Rome, New York at 5:30 p.m., local time, on [Date].

Who Can Vote at the Meeting

You are entitled to vote if the records of Rome Bancorp, Inc. showed that you held shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock as of the close of business on [Record Date]. As of the close of business on that date, a total of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock were outstanding. Each share of common stock has one vote. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”) and you want to vote your shares in person at the meeting, you will have to get a written proxy in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares.

Quorum; Vote Required

The special meeting will conduct business only if a majority of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock entitled to vote is represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. If you return valid proxy instructions or attend the meeting in person, your shares will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you abstain from voting. Broker non-votes also will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

Proposal 1: Approval of the merger agreement.  Approval of the merger agreement will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock entitled to vote at the meeting. Failure to return a properly executed proxy card or to vote in person will have the same effect as a vote against the merger agreement. Broker non-votes and abstentions from voting will have the same effect as voting against the merger agreement.

Proposal 2: Adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies.  The affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast is required to approve the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the merger agreement.

Shares Held by Rome Bancorp, Inc. Officers and Directors and by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.

As of [Record Date], directors and executive officers of Rome Bancorp, Inc. beneficially owned shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock, not including shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of stock options. This equals% of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The directors and executive officers of Rome Bancorp, Inc. have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger at the special meeting. As of the same date, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries and its directors and executive officers owned shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. This equals% of the total outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock.

Voting and Revocability of Proxies

You may vote in person at the special meeting or by proxy. To ensure your representation at the special meeting, Rome Bancorp, Inc. recommends that you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the special meeting. You can always change your vote at the special meeting.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders whose shares are held in “street name” by their broker, bank or other nominee must follow the instructions provided by their broker, bank or other nominee to vote their shares. Your broker or bank may allow you to deliver your voting instructions via the telephone or the Internet.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Voting instructions are included on your proxy form. If you properly complete and timely submit your proxy, your shares will be voted as you have directed. You may vote for, against, or abstain with respect to the approval of the merger agreement and the proposal to adjourn the meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock and submit your proxy without specifying a voting instruction, your shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock will be voted “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the merger agreement. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the merger agreement and “FOR” approval of the proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to approve the merger agreement.

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:

filing with the Secretary of Rome Bancorp, Inc. a duly executed revocation of proxy;
submitting a new proxy with a later date; or
voting in person at the special meeting.

Attendance at the special meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute a revocation of a proxy. All written notices of revocation and other communication with respect to the revocation of proxies should be addressed to:

Rome Bancorp, Inc.
Crystal M. Seymore, Secretary
100 W. Dominick Street
Rome, New York 13440

If any matters not described in this document are properly presented at the special meeting, the persons named in the proxy card will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. Rome Bancorp, Inc. does not know of any other matters to be presented at the meeting.

Solicitation of Proxies

Rome Bancorp, Inc. will pay for this proxy solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail,, a proxy solicitation firm, will assist Rome Bancorp, Inc. in soliciting proxies for the special meeting. Rome Bancorp, Inc. will pay $ for these services. Rome Bancorp, Inc. will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. Additionally, directors, officers and employees of Rome Bancorp, Inc. may solicit proxies personally and by telephone. None of these persons will receive additional or special compensation for soliciting proxies.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

RIGHTS OF DISSENTING STOCKHOLDERS

Under Delaware law, holders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock that do not wish to accept the merger consideration may elect to have the value of their shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock judicially determined and paid in cash, together with a fair rate of interest, if any. The valuation will exclude any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger. A stockholder may only exercise such appraisal rights by complying with the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

The following summary of the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law is not a complete statement of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, a copy of which is attached to this document as Annex C and incorporated into this summary by reference. If you wish to exercise appraisal rights or wish to preserve your right to do so, you should carefully review Section 262 and are urged to consult a legal advisor before electing or attempting to exercise these rights.

All references in Section 262 and in this summary to a “stockholder” are to the record holder of the shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock as to which appraisal rights are asserted. A person having a beneficial interest in shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a bank, broker or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow properly the steps summarized below and in a timely manner to perfect appraisal rights.

Under Section 262, where a proposed merger is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, as in the case of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s special meeting, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders entitled to appraisal rights that these appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a copy of Section 262. This document constitutes notice to the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders of the availability of appraisal rights, and the applicable statutory provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law are attached to this document as Annex C.

Any Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder wishing to exercise the right to demand appraisal under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law must satisfy each of the following conditions:

The stockholder must deliver to Rome Bancorp, Inc. a written demand for appraisal of its shares before the vote on the merger agreement at Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s special meeting. This demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs Rome Bancorp, Inc. of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends by that writing to demand the appraisal of its shares.
The stockholder must not vote its shares of common stock in favor of the merger agreement. A proxy that does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of the merger agreement. Therefore, a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder who votes by proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must vote against the merger agreement or abstain from voting on the merger agreement. Voting against, abstaining from voting on or failing to vote on the proposal to approve and adopt the merger agreement will not constitute a written demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262. The written demand for appraisal must be made in addition to and separate from any proxy you deliver or vote you cast in person.
The stockholder must continuously hold its shares from the date of making the written demand through the completion of the merger. A stockholder who is the record holder of shares of common stock on the date the written demand for appraisal is made but who thereafter transfers those shares prior to the completion of the merger will lose any right to appraisal in respect of those shares.

Only a stockholder of record of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock is entitled to assert appraisal rights for those shares registered in that holder’s name. A demand for appraisal should:

be executed by or on behalf of the stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as its name appears on the stock transfer records of Rome Bancorp, Inc.;
specify the stockholder’s name and mailing address;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

specify the number of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock owned by the stockholder; and
specify that the stockholder intends thereby to demand appraisal of its common stock.

If the shares are owned of record by a person in a fiduciary capacity, such as a trustee, guardian or custodian, the demand should be executed in that capacity. If the shares are owned of record by more than one person as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by or on behalf of all owners. An authorized agent, including an agent for two or more joint owners, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a stockholder; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for such owner or owners. A record holder such as a bank or broker who holds shares as nominee for several beneficial owners may exercise appraisal rights with respect to the shares held for one or more beneficial owners while not exercising these rights with respect to the shares held for one or more other beneficial owners. In this case, the written demand should set forth the number of shares as to which appraisal is sought, and where no number of shares is expressly mentioned the demand will be presumed to cover all shares held in the name of the record owner.

Stockholders who hold their shares in brokerage accounts or other nominee forms and who wish to exercise appraisal rights are urged to consult with their nominees to determine appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal by such nominee.

A stockholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights pursuant to Section 262 should mail or deliver a written demand to:

Rome Bancorp, Inc.
100 W. Dominick Street
P.O. Box 1567
Rome, New York 13440
Attention: Crystal M. Seymore
Corporate Secretary

Within ten days after the completion of the merger, Berkshire must send a notice as to the completion of the merger to each of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s former stockholders who has made a written demand for appraisal in accordance with Section 262 and who has not voted in favor of or consented to adoption of the merger agreement. Within 120 days after the completion of the merger, but not after that date, either Berkshire or any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the shares of common stock held by all stockholders demanding appraisal of their shares. Berkshire is under no obligation to, and has no present intent to file a petition for appraisal, and stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will file a petition or that it will initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of the shares. Accordingly, stockholders who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262. Since Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has no obligation to file a petition, the failure of affected stockholders to do so within the period specified could nullify any previous written demand for appraisal. Under the merger agreement, Rome Bancorp, Inc. has agreed to give Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. prompt notice of any demands for appraisal it receives. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has the right to participate in all negotiations and proceedings with respect to demands for appraisal. Rome Bancorp, Inc. will not, except with the prior written consent of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., make any payment with respect to any demands for appraisal, offer to settle, or settle, any demands.

Within 120 days after the completion of the merger, any stockholder that complies with the provisions of Section 262 to that point in time will be entitled to receive from Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., upon written request, a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger agreement and with respect to which Rome Bancorp, Inc. received demands for appraisal and the aggregate number of holders of those shares. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. must mail this statement to the stockholder by the later of ten days after receipt of the request or ten days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisals under Section 262.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

A stockholder who timely files a petition for appraisal with the Delaware Court of Chancery must serve a copy upon Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. must, within 20 days of receipt of the petition, file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded appraisal of their shares and who have not reached agreements with it as to the value of their shares. After notice to stockholders as may be ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Court of Chancery is empowered to conduct a hearing on the petition to determine which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation on the certificates of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings, and if any stockholder fails to comply with the requirement, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to that stockholder. After determining what stockholders are entitled to an appraisal, the Delaware Court of Chancery will appraise the “fair value” of their shares. This value will exclude any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, but will include a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. The costs of the action may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and taxed upon the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable. Upon application of a stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may also order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding be charged pro rata against the value of all of the shares entitled to appraisal. These expenses may include, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and the fees and expenses of experts. Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares as determined under Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than the merger consideration they would be entitled to receive pursuant to the merger agreement if they did not seek appraisal of their shares. Stockholders should also be aware that investment banking opinions as to fairness from a financial point of view are not necessarily opinions as to fair value under Section 262.

In determining fair value and, if applicable, a fair rate of interest, the Delaware Court of Chancery is to take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered, and that “fair price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.”

Section 262 provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court construed Section 262 to mean that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.” Any stockholder who has duly demanded an appraisal in compliance with Section 262 will not, after the completion of the merger, be entitled to vote the shares subject to that demand for any purpose or be entitled to the payment of dividends or other distributions on those shares. However, stockholders will be entitled to dividends or other distributions payable to holders of record of shares as of a record date prior to the completion of the merger.

Any stockholder may withdraw its demand for appraisal and accept the merger consideration by delivering to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., within 60 days of the effective date of the merger, a written withdrawal of the stockholder’s demands for appraisal. Any attempt to withdraw made more than 60 days after the effective date of the merger will require written approval of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Moreover, no appraisal proceeding before the Delaware Court of Chancery as to any stockholder shall be dismissed without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon any terms the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just. If Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. does not approve a stockholder’s request to withdraw a demand for appraisal when the approval is required or if the Delaware Court of Chancery does not approve the dismissal of an appraisal proceeding, the stockholder would be entitled to receive only the appraised value determined in any such appraisal proceeding. This value could be higher or lower than, or the same as, the value of the merger consideration.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Failure to follow the steps required by Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law for perfecting appraisal rights may result in the loss of appraisal rights, in which event you will be entitled to receive the consideration with respect to your dissenting shares in accordance with the merger agreement. In view of the complexity of the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, if you are a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder and are considering exercising your appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law, you should consult your own legal advisor.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION OF THE MERGER

The following summary of the merger agreement is qualified by reference to the complete text of the merger agreement. A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. You should read the merger agreement completely and carefully as it, rather than this description, is the legal document that governs the merger.

General

The merger agreement provides for the merger of Rome Bancorp, Inc. with and into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. as the surviving entity. Immediately following the merger of Rome Bancorp, Inc. with and into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., The Rome Savings Bank will merge with and into Berkshire Bank, with Berkshire Bank as the surviving entity.

Background of the Merger

As part of the ongoing consideration and evaluation of its long-term prospects and strategies, the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Legacy’s board of directors looks for and considershas considered from time to time various opportunities for growth throughincreasing long-term value for Legacy stockholders, taking into account, among other factors, Legacy’s recent performance, its future prospects, and various strategic acquisitionsalternatives available to it. In recent years, in conjunction with the Legacy board of directors’ assessment of such matters, it has received presentations by several investment banking firms, including Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., or combinations with, otherKBW, and Legacy's senior executives regarding trends in the regulatory environment, the economy and the financial institutions. During certainmarketplace, including information relating to recent merger and acquisition activity. In some cases these reviews included a discussion by Legacy’s legal counsel of its regularly scheduledthe legal standards applicable to the decisions and actions of Legacy's board of directors. Most meetings in 2010,of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Legacy board of directors discussed and reviewed general market conditions, the mergers and acquisitions landscape and potential opportunities for growth with its senior management.at which these reviews were conducted included an executive session from which non-independent directors were excused.

The Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire’s board of directors and senior management from time to time have regularly reviewed Berkshire’s strategic alternatives and assessed Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s business strategies and objectives, including strategicvarious opportunities all with the goal of enhancingfor increasing long-term stockholder value. As partThese reviews included several assessments by executive management and/or Berkshire’s financial advisors, of this ongoing reviewBerkshire’s financial performance and assessment,trends in the Rome Bancorp, Inc.financial marketplace, including merger and acquisition activity, both locally and nationwide. In some cases these reviews included a discussion by Berkshire’s legal counsel of the legal standards applicable to the decisions and actions of Berkshire’s board of directors.

Legacy and Berkshire are headquartered in Pittsfield, Massachusetts. J. Williar Dunlaevy, Legacy’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Michael P. Daly, Berkshire’s President and Chief Executive Officer, have spoken from time to time about economic conditions as well as the business and regulatory climate for banks operating in their market areas. In addition, following Patrick J. Sullivan’s appointment in April 2010 as Legacy’s President and the President and Chief Executive Officer of Legacy Banks, Mr. Daly became acquainted with Mr. Sullivan.

Developments before Execution of Merger Agreement

Messrs. Daly and Sullivan met on August 30, 2010. They discussed various challenges faced by community banks located in Berkshire County in achieving growth while maintaining strong asset quality and capital. Mr. Daly asked if Legacy might be willing to explore a merger with Berkshire. Mr. Daly also informed Mr. Sullivan that Berkshire was interested in acquiring more than 5% of Legacy common stock. Mr. Sullivan responded that while Legacy's strategic plans were to remain independent and serve its customers, Legacy's board of directors has considered a range of potential opportunities, including acquisitions, business combinations and other strategic alternatives. In particular, beginning shortly after the third anniversarywas aware of the company’s second step conversionneed to remain competitive and to create stockholder value, and that a merger of Legacy and Berkshire might be consistent with those objectives.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

At various times during the late summer and early fall of 2010, Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan and the Legacy board of directors, or in March of 2008, Rome Bancorp, Inc. periodically received unsolicited, informal inquiries from other banks regarding a potential transaction. Rome Bancorp, Inc. utilizedsome cases the servicesboard’s Mergers and Acquisitions Committee, met with one of several investment banking firms, including KBW. Together with those investment banking firms, the Legacy directors considered Legacy’s financial condition and recent profitability compared to other community banks headquartered in Massachusetts of generally comparable size. The Legacy directors also considered Legacy’s projected financial condition and operating results for the 2011 – 2012 period that Legacy’s senior management recently had prepared in connection with Legacy’s capital planning process. The directors also discussed on various occasions after August 30, 2010 the implications of Berkshire acquiring more than 5% of Legacy common stock and whether a merger with Berkshire could be expected to be the most advantageous strategic alternative for Legacy for the foreseeable future. In many of those discussions, the directors also considered an overview of potential acquisition targets or consulting firms to assist it in evaluating several“merger of these proposals, noneequals” partners for Legacy, as well as a list of which proceeded beyond the preliminary stage.

In the spring of 2010, a director of Rome Bancorp, Inc. received an unsolicited inquiry from a director of a publicly traded community banksubstantially larger banking companies, including Berkshire, that are headquartered in New England or upstate New York and, in the view of one or more of the investment banking firms, might be willing to consider a merger with Legacy. In connection with those discussions, the directors received information regarding recent mergers and acquisitions market for community banks in New England and the range of implied valuations of Legacy based upon recent community bank mergers and acquisitions. The directors also received a general indication from various investment banking firms regarding the possibilityrange of prices at which Legacy common stock could be expected to trade in the future if Legacy remained independent, or pursued an acquisition strategy, as well as a general indication of the range of values that the Legacy directors could reasonably expect in a merger based upon transaction values in recent community bank acquiring Rome Bancorp, Inc. Rome Bancorp, Inc. askedmergers. (The projected Legacy financial condition and operating results for the 2011-2012 period sometimes are referred to in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as “Legacy’s Management Projections.” A condensed version of Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 is included elsewhere in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. See “— Legacy’s 2011 Management Financial Projections” beginning on page 46 of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.)

One such presentation by an investment banking firm to the Legacy directors occurred in connection with a previously scheduled, full-day strategic planning session of the boards of directors of Legacy and Legacy Banks held on September 29, 2010. Mr. Sullivan and other members of Legacy management led a discussion of Legacy's recent performance and near-term future prospects as reflected in Legacy’s Management Projections. An investment banking firm other than KBW delivered a presentation regarding Legacy’s financial condition and recent profitability compared to other community banks headquartered in New England and upstate New York, and provided an overview of the current mergers and acquisitions market for community banks both headquartered in the New England or upstate New York region and nationwide. During an executive session following the strategic planning session, Mr. Sullivan informed the directors of Legacy and Legacy Banks that Mr. Daly had approached him informally regarding a possible merger of Legacy and Berkshire.

In October 2010, Berkshire consulted with Sandler O’Neill to assist itBerkshire in evaluating itsassessing the financial implications of a merger with Legacy.

In mid-October, Legacy’s board of directors and KBW met to discuss Mr. Daly’s overtures and to consider various strategic options available to Legacy, including a possible business combinationpotential merger with a larger banking company. The Legacy board of directors requested that KBW prepare a more refined presentation in which KBW identified the community bank. Sandler O’Neill isother large banking companies headquartered in New England or upstate New York, in addition to Berkshire, that might be willing to consider a nationally recognizedmerger with Legacy. The Legacy board of directors also asked KBW to provide an assessment of the relative levels of interest that KBW expected those companies would have in considering a merger with Legacy and the range in which the Legacy board of directors could expect Legacy common stock to be valued in a merger with such companies. In addition, on November 1, 2010, Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan met separately with KBW and another investment banking firm whose principalto discuss the economy and the financial marketplace generally, including information relating to recent merger and acquisition activity involving community banks.

Messrs. Daly and Sullivan met on November 4, 2010, at Mr. Daly’s request, to discuss in more detail the potential advantages to Legacy and Berkshire of a merger. Specific financial terms of a possible merger were not discussed.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Legacy's board of directors met again on November 8, 2010. Mr. Sullivan reported on his recent discussions with Mr. Daly regarding a potential merger of Legacy and Berkshire. During the ensuing discussion, the Legacy board of directors focused on whether it was an opportune time for Legacy to actively pursue a merger with a larger banking company and whether it was advisable for Legacy to negotiate exclusively with Berkshire and, if so, the range in which the Legacy board of directors could expect Legacy common stock to be valued in such a merger.

As part of the Legacy board of directors’ November 8, 2010 deliberations, KBW provided an overview of various community bank acquisitions nationwide and of various acquisitions of community banks headquartered in New England or upstate New York. KBW also presented an overview of Berkshire’s business, specialty is financial institutions.condition and recent operating results, and a preliminary assessment of the advantages to Legacy stockholders of a merger with Berkshire, including a discussion of the relevant demographic factors in the banks’ markets, the combined bank’s pro forma deposit share in various communities, and the extent to which the combined bank’s mix of loans would be more diverse than Legacy’s. In discussing the ordinary coursecombined bank’s deposits, KBW observed that the bank would have a significant market share of deposits in Berkshire County, Massachusetts and likely would be required by regulators to divest a portion of its investmentdeposits and several branches in the Berkshire County region in order to mitigate the increase in market concentration resulting from the merger. KBW also presented an analysis of the financial impact on Legacy and Berkshire stockholders of a hypothetical merger of Legacy and Berkshire under various assumptions regarding the price at which Legacy common stock would be valued in such merger.

In connection with a discussion of the relative merits of actively soliciting proposals from several banking business,companies rather than negotiating exclusively with Berkshire, KBW provided the Legacy board of directors with information regarding other large banking companies headquartered in New England or upstate New York that might be willing to consider a merger with Legacy, a general indication of the relative levels of interest that KBW expected those companies would have in considering a merger with Legacy, and an analysis of the financial impact on those parties of a hypothetical merger with Legacy, under various assumptions regarding the price at which Legacy common stock would be valued in such mergers.

After discussing the potential risks and benefits associated with pursuing a potential merger of Legacy with a larger banking company generally and with Berkshire in particular, the Legacy board of directors decided at the conclusion of the November 8, 2010 meeting that KBW should not solicit merger proposals at that time from one or more banking companies in addition to Berkshire, and authorized Legacy’s senior management to enter into a mutual nondisclosure agreement with Berkshire and to engage in detailed merger discussions with Berkshire with a goal of persuading Berkshire to value Legacy common stock at or above $16.00 per share in such a transaction.

Berkshire and Legacy entered into a mutual nondisclosure agreement on November 18, 2010. Mr. Daly and Kevin Riley, Berkshire’s Chief Financial Officer, met later that day with Mr. Sullivan and Paul Bruce, Legacy’s Chief Financial Officer, Sandler O’Neill, is regularly engagedand KBW to discuss Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011, as well as other financial, strategic and operational matters pertinent to a merger of Legacy and Berkshire, including the range of cost savings that Legacy’s senior management expected could be realized if Legacy merged with Berkshire.

On November 22, 2010, Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan met with Mr. Daly to discuss the financial terms of a possible merger, review the transaction costs that likely would be incurred in such a merger, and consider the range of cost savings that reasonably could be achieved if Legacy and Berkshire were combined. Mr. Daly informed Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan that Berkshire was inclined to value Legacy common stock in a merger at a price per share ranging from $14.00 to $15.00. Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan explained why the Legacy board of directors believed a valuation of not less than $16.00 was appropriate.

On November 29, 2010, Berkshire delivered to Legacy a written non-binding expression of interest, or letter of intent, outlining the terms of the proposed merger. In that letter of intent, Berkshire proposed that 75% of the shares of Legacy common stock would be converted into shares of Berkshire common stock in the merger at an exchange ratio of 0.75 shares of Berkshire common stock for each share of Legacy common stock, and that the remaining 25% of Legacy common stock would receive $15.00 per share in cash. Based upon the closing price of Berkshire common stock on November 29, 2010, the stock component of


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Berkshire’s proposal had a value of $15.09 per share of Legacy common stock. Berkshire proposed that the exchange ratio would not be adjusted in the event of a decline in the market price of Berkshire common stock, that “out-of-the-money” Legacy stock options would be canceled in exchange for a payment of $3.00 per share, and that other Legacy stock options would be exchanged for Berkshire stock options having equivalent economic terms. Berkshire proposed a termination fee equal to 5% of the equity value of the transaction. The letter of intent also stated that Berkshire would honor existing Legacy severance and change in control agreements, provided that it could do so without incurring material adverse tax consequences; appoint Mr. Dunlaevy and one other Legacy director to the Berkshire board of directors; employ Mr. Sullivan in an executive capacity; and enter into a consulting arrangement with Mr. Dunlaevy, providing for a continuing role with the Legacy Banks Foundation and Berkshire Bank. Berkshire’s proposal also indicated that it would use the name “Legacy” in the name of its Berkshire County branches. As a condition for proceeding, Berkshire required that Legacy commit to negotiate on an exclusive basis for a 30-day period while each party completed its due diligence review of the other and endeavored to negotiate a definitive merger agreement and related transaction documents.

The Legacy board of directors met on November 30, 2010 to consider Berkshire’s letter of intent. Also present at that meeting were KBW and Nutter McClennen & Fish, counsel to Legacy. Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan briefed the Legacy board of directors on the negotiations with Berkshire since the November 8, 2010 meeting. Mr. Sullivan noted that Berkshire had delivered a revised letter of intent, dated November 30, 2010, stating that Berkshire was willing to reduce the termination fee to 4% of the equity value of the transaction, designate Legacy’s current executive office building as the headquarters of Berkshire and Berkshire Bank, and allow Legacy to terminate the merger agreement if the average trading price of Berkshire’s common stock declined materially, both in absolute terms and relative to the trading prices of an index group over that period, and if Berkshire did not exercise its option to increase the ratio of Berkshire common stock to be exchanged for Legacy common stock.

At the November 30, 2010 meeting of the Legacy board of directors, KBW reviewed the financial terms of Berkshire’s proposal. Nutter McClennen & Fish discussed the legal standards applicable to the decisions and actions of the Legacy board of directors and reviewed the proposed terms and conditions in the Berkshire letter of intent, including the treatment of Legacy stock options and existing Legacy severance and change in control agreements, as well as the implications of provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to severance payments. Nutter McClennen & Fish also discussed the terms of the Legacy 2006 Equity Incentive Plan relevant to the treatment of options, and KBW discussed how the proposed cash payment of $3.00 in exchange for the cancellation of certain “out-of-the-money” Legacy stock options related to an estimate of the valuation of those options based upon a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Nutter McClennen & Fish also discussed the implications of Berkshire’s requirement that Legacy directors and executive officers enter into a voting agreement with Berkshire pursuant to which Legacy directors and executive officers would agree to vote the shares held by them in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan described the timing of and arrangements for Berkshire’s onsite due diligence review, which was scheduled to begin after the close of business on December 3, 2010, as well as Legacy’s planned due diligence review of Berkshire that would take place subsequently.

At the conclusion of the November 30, 2010 meeting, Legacy’s board of directors authorized management to continue to pursue a merger with Berkshire on the terms set forth in Berkshire’s revised letter of intent. The Legacy board of directors also authorized Legacy’s senior management to engage KBW to provide financial institutions and their securitiesadvisory services in connection with mergersa possible merger with Berkshire and acquisitionsany other potential merger or sale. Legacy formally engaged KBW on December 9, 2010. KBW is nationally recognized for providing investment banking and other corporate transactions.financial advisory services to financial institutions. In particular, in the opinion of the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy board of directors, Sandler O’NeillKBW has an excellent reputation for knowledge of and experience with small, medium and large banks headquartered in New England or upstate New York. In retaining a financial advisor to provide financial advisory services in connection with a sale or merger, the Legacy board of directors considered knowledge of both the large community banks and regional banking franchises headquartered in New England or upstate New York and New England regions. Sandler O’Neill had informal discussions with(which the financial advisor forLegacy board of directors expected would be the community bank from timemost likely type of company to time over the next several months. During this same time period, in order to get a sense of the potential market for a transaction with Rome Bancorp, Inc., Sandler O’Neill also contacted four other banks in the region that Sandler O’Neill believed might be interested in a transactionmerger with Rome Bancorp, Inc. On April 12, 2010,Legacy) and the current environment for community bank entered into a confidentiality agreement with Sandler O’Neill, pursuantmergers important to which Sandler O’Neill agreed to provide the community bank with confidential and proprietary information about Rome Bancorp, Inc. and the community bank agreed, among other things, to keep such information confidential and not to disclose such information except as set forth in the confidentiality agreement. Confidentiality agreements were later signed with two of the other four banks contacted by Sandler O’Neill.

In late April of 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. received an unsolicited, non-binding proposal from a private investor group to acquire control of Rome Bancorp, Inc. Under this proposal, the investor group would purchase a majority interest in Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock in a private placement of newly issued shares and gain control of the management andLegacy board of directorsdirectors’ evaluation of the company. Immediately following the private placement, Rome Bancorp, Inc. would conduct a tender offer to purchase 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Rome Bancorp, Inc., excluding shares owned by the investor group, at $11.05 permerger with Berkshire,


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

share. The investor group subsequently increasedas well as consideration of Legacy’s other strategic alternatives. In addition, the priceLegacy board of directors had successfully worked with KBW on several prior matters. Taking into account this prior working relationship and the fact that, in Legacy’s view, no other financial advisor would be better qualified to advise on the type of merger that Legacy planned to consider, the Legacy board of directors did not consider it would paynecessary to formally consider or request proposals from other financial advisors in connection with a possible merger or sale. Legacy received independent legal advice from Nutter McClennen & Fish in negotiating the tender offerterms of KBW’s engagement.

Beginning on December 1, 2010, Legacy prepared to $11.25 per share. The proposal was atprovide Berkshire with access to all times subject to the investor group’srequested non-public information that Berkshire had requested in connection with its due diligence review, including, among other things, by assembling a “virtual” data room by electronic means, recognizing that the virtual data room could be used to provide due diligence information to other possible merger partners.

On December 3, 2010, after further analysis of Rome Bancorp, Inc.the impact that combined bank’s pro forma deposit share in the Berkshire County region would have on the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, or HHI, which is a measure of market concentration used by federal bank regulators and the United States Department of Justice to evaluate the competitive effects of the merger, Legacy decided to delay granting Berkshire access to the virtual data room and permitting Berkshire to commence its on-site due diligence review until Legacy and Berkshire conducted a more detailed analysis of competitive effects of the proposed merger and engaged in informal discussions with federal bank regulators and the Department of Justice. On May 24,December 3, 2010, Berkshire retained Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (“Wachtell”) as special counsel for antitrust matters, and from December 3 through December 7, Berkshire and Legacy undertook a more detailed analysis of the impact the proposed merger would have on the HHI in the Berkshire County region. In addition, Wachtell, together with Nutter McClennen & Fish and Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick (“Luse Gorman”), merger counsel for Berkshire, engaged in informal discussions with federal bank regulators and the Department of Justice regarding the HHI methodology that would be applied to the proposed merger. Based upon that analysis and those informal discussions, Berkshire and Legacy reached a general consensus that the required divestment of deposits could reasonably be expected to be in the range of $150 million to $200 million, recognizing, however, that counsel’s informal discussions would not preclude any of the federal bank regulators or the Department of Justice from taking positions different from those expressed during those discussions, and that therefore there was some risk that federal bank regulators or the Department of Justice could require divestment of a greater amount of deposits in order to mitigate the increase in market concentration resulting from the merger.

On December 8, 2010, the Legacy board of directors metreceived an update from Legacy’s senior management and Nutter McClennen & Fish regarding the basis for the view that the required deposit divestment could reasonably be expected to discussbe in the proposal from the investor group.range of $150 million to $200 million. At the meeting, Legacy’s senior management summarized the more detailed HHI analysis conducted by Berkshire and Wachtell and the preliminary discussions with federal bank regulators and the Department of Justice. Nutter McClennen & Fish also reviewed how the risk of a required divestment of a portion of the combined bank’s Berkshire County deposits, together with related branches and loans, would relate to the customary closing condition that would obligate the parties to complete the merger unless a regulatory approval imposed a “burdensome condition.” Nutter McClennen & Fish and Legacy senior management also discussed the fact that federal bank regulators and the Department of Justice typically require that the divested deposits come from the institution being acquired, in this case Legacy, and the implications of that policy for employee and customer retention. The Legacy board of directors expressed concerns regardingalso considered the highly contingent naturerisk that the time necessary for the federal banking regulators and viabilitythe Department of Justice to determine the amount and composition of deposits, loans and branch locations in Berkshire County to be divested might materially delay the receipt of one or more regulatory approvals to complete the merger.

At the conclusion of the investor group’s proposal. Specifically,December 8, 2010 meeting, the board had significant concerns about the structure of the transaction, including that the tender offer structure was not in the best interests of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders; the inability of the currentLegacy board of directors concurred with management’s recommendation to protectallow Berkshire to have access to the interestsvirtual data room and to commence its on-site due diligence review, provided that Legacy and Berkshire could reach a satisfactory understanding as to how to allocate the divestment risk in the merger agreement. Later that day, after Luse Gorman and Nutter McClennen & Fish exchanged drafts of the company’s stockholderstext of the regulatory closing condition and the definition of “Material Adverse Effect” to be included in the tender offer after the change in control had occurred; the lack of any clear “fiduciary out” or ability of the board to consider alternative, and possibly superior, proposals under the proposed transaction structure; and the possibility that the NASDAQ rules could require the approval of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stockholders to complete the first-step private placement despite the tender offer structure being designed in part to complete the transaction more quickly than a traditional merger transaction. In addition, the board was concerned that, other than wishing to use Rome Bancorp, Inc. and The Rome Savings Bank as a platform to acquire other banks in order to become a regional banking franchise, the investor group did not seem to have a well articulated business plan; the investor group had not identified the new management team and board of directors for the company; and the investor group had not yet raised the capital necessary to complete the transaction, or obtained commitments from investors to raise such capital. Moreover, based on its discussions with SNR Denton US LLP, the company’s legal counsel, the board believed that there was significant uncertainty regarding the ability of the investor group to obtain, in a timely manner or at all, the regulatory approvals necessary to acquire control of Rome Bancorp, Inc. The board was also concerned that even if such approval were obtained, any approval was likely to include conditions that could threaten or delay the closing of a transaction. The board also discussed the advantages and disadvantages of selling the company compared to remaining independent. As a result of all the foregoing considerations, the board unanimously voted not to proceed with the investor group’s proposal and determined that it would continue to execute its independent business plan. Subsequent to the board decision, the investor group offered to increase the transaction value to $11.75 per share, consisting of $11.25 in cash and $0.50 in stock, again subject to the investor group’s due diligence. The board considered the revised proposal, but, based on the board’s concerns regarding the highly contingent nature and viability of the offer and its continuing concerns regarding the factors discussed above, the board again unanimously voted not to proceed with the investor group’s proposal.

On June 10, 2010, by letter dated April 8, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. formally engaged Sandler O’Neill to act as its financial advisor to assist it in evaluating its strategic options, including a possible business combination with another party. On June 17, 2010, at a meeting of the board in which Sandler O’Neill participated, the board discussed verbal, non-binding expressions of interest from the above referenced community bank and one of the other four banks contacted by Sandler O’Neill. The other three banks contacted by Sandler O’Neill did not submit any expressions of interest to Rome Bancorp, Inc. After extensive discussion, the board directed Sandler O’Neill to obtain a written expression of interest from the community bank. The board rejected the expression of interest from the other bank due to the inadequacy of the price offered. Sandler O’Neill informed this other bank that the board had rejected its expression of interest because the price was inadequate and invited the bank to increase its offer. However, the other bank declined to do so.

On June 23, 2010, after continued discussions between Sandler O’Neill and the financial advisor for the above referenced community bank, Rome Bancorp, Inc. received a written, non-binding proposal from the community bank to enter into a merger agreement, with Rome Bancorp, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the proposal, the community bank offered to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Rome Bancorp, Inc. for a combination of cashBerkshire and common stock. The initial proposal specified that 80% of the merger consideration was to be paidLegacy agreed in the community bank’s common stock at a fixed exchange ratio and 20% of the merger consideration was to be paid in cash at $11.25 per share. Based on the closing price of the community bank’s common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market on the date prior to the proposal, the aggregate transaction value was approximately $76.5 million, or $11.25 per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock outstanding. In addition, in the proposal, the community bank agreed to designate one Rome Bancorp, Inc. director to serve on its board of directors following completion of the merger. The proposal also provided that Rome Bancorp, Inc. employment agreements, change-in-control agreements, and other existing management severance arrangements would be honored with any contractually due severance payments to be handled in a tax efficient manner. In addition, the proposal provided that any employees of The Rome Savings Bank who


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

would not be retained byprinciple that the community bank after the merger would be entitled to receive severance payments. Any definitive merger agreement would contain normal and customary representations, warranties and terms and conditions. The transactioninclude a regulatory closing condition that would be subjectsatisfied so long as no regulatory approval contained any condition or requirement that would result in a Material Adverse Effect, and that the definition of Material Adverse Effect specifically would exclude the impact of a requirement contained in any regulatory approval, or as a condition necessary to obtain any required regulatory approval, that there be a divesture of not more than $200 million of deposit liabilities, whether from Legacy, Berkshire or a combination of the two, together with related branch premises and stockholder approvals. The proposal was subjectsuch loans as one of more bank regulators may require in connection with such divestiture.

Legacy gave Berkshire access to Legacy’s virtual data room late in the afternoon on December 8, 2010 and Berkshire conducted its on-site due diligence review during non-business hours from December 8 through December 10, 2010. Legacy conducted a more limited due diligence review of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire on December 10 and 11, 2010, consisting of Legacy’s senior management, KBW and Nutter McClennen & Fish interviewing senior Berkshire management and reviewing certain non-public information, as well as a limited review of certain loans performed by an independent loan review company retained by Legacy.

Messrs. Dunlaevy, Sullivan and Daly met on December 14, 2010 to discuss the community bank.due diligence findings of their respective organizations and the implications for financial, strategic and operational matters pertinent to a merger of Legacy and Berkshire. Mr. Daly informed Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan that following Berkshire’s due diligence review, Berkshire no longer was willing to value Legacy at $15.00 per share. In explaining Berkshire’s position, Mr. Daly emphasized two post-November 29, 2010 developments. First, Berkshire’s interest rate mark, in which Berkshire valued Legacy’s assets and liabilities to reflect the increase in interest rates since September 30, 2010, indicated that Berkshire would need to materially decrease its estimate of the fair value of Legacy’s net assets, as compared to Berkshire’s previous fair value estimate based upon information as of September 30, 2010 that was available to Berkshire when it submitted its November 29, 2010 letter of intent. Second, Berkshire estimated that as part of its fair value adjustments it would need to record a significant credit related discount to the value of Legacy’s relatively illiquid investments in commercial real estate and commercial real estate finance. Mr. Daly told Mr. Sullivan that Berkshire believed the appropriate valuation of Legacy common stock in a merger was in the range of $12 to $13 per share. Further discussions took place on December 14 and 15 between Mr. Daly and Mr. Sullivan and between Sandler O’Neill and KBW regarding the appropriate valuation of Legacy common stock in a merger with Berkshire. In addition, at Mr. Sullivan’s request, KBW confirmed that Berkshire had calculated its interest rate mark in a commercially reasonable manner.

At its regularly scheduled meeting on June 23,On December 15, 2010, theMr. Sullivan and KBW briefed Legacy’s board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. discussedon Berkshire’s due diligence findings and Berkshire’s proposal to reduce the value that Legacy stockholders would receive in a merger with Berkshire. Mr. Sullivan and KBW summarized how the material terms of the community bank’srevised proposal with Sandler O’Neill. After extensive discussion,that Berkshire had communicated orally before the meeting differed from the proposal that the Legacy board authorized managementof directors considered on November 30, 2010. Specifically, Mr. Sullivan and KBW reported that Berkshire proposed to proceed with discussions with the community bank under the terms set forthvalue Legacy common stock at $13.00 per share in the community bank’s proposal. Themerger, and that for a period of time after the merger agreement was signed, sometimes referred to in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as the “go-shop period,” Legacy would be permitted to initiate, solicit and encourage any inquiry or the making of any proposal or offer that could constitute an acquisition proposal, provide non-public information relating to Legacy, and participate in discussions and negotiate with third parties agreedwith respect to an exclusivity periodacquisition proposals. In discussing the go-shop feature, KBW reported that would last through August 8, 2010.

OverBerkshire had proposed that if Legacy were to terminate the next several weeks, the community bank conducted a due diligence review of Rome Bancorp, Inc. On July 8, 2010, legal counsel to the community bank transmitted a draft merger agreement to Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its advisors. SNR Denton US LLP transmittedaccept a Superior Proposal (as defined in the comments of Rome Bancorp, Inc., Sandler O’Neill and SNR Denton US LLP toMerger Agreement) made during the community bank’s legal counsel on July 14, 2010. On July 19, 2010, based ongo-shop period, the results of its due diligence review,termination fee would be less than the community bank provided Rome Bancorp, Inc. with a revised, non-binding proposal to acquire Rome Bancorp, Inc. in which the stock portion of the merger consideration was increased from 80% to 90%; the cash portion of the merger consideration was reduced from 20% to 10%; the price of the cash consideration was reduced from $11.25 per share to $10.50 per share; and the fixed exchange ratio was reduced to a figure4% termination fee that would resultapply to an acquisition proposal accepted after the go-shop period. KBW also reported that as a further inducement for Legacy to accept the reduced pricing, Berkshire was willing to share with Legacy stockholders any deposit premium in the stock consideration being priced at $10.50 per share (based on the community bank’s closing price on the NASDAQ Stock Market on dateexcess of the revised proposal). As a result of these changes, the proposed aggregate transaction value had been reduced to $71.4 million from $76.5 million. After reviewing the community bank’s3.5% that Berkshire receives for divested deposits. In considering Berkshire’s revised proposal, at a meeting in which Sandler O’Neill and SNR Denton US LLP participated, the Legacy board of directors considered the relative merits of Rome Bancorp, Inc. concludedthen actively soliciting proposals from several banking companies rather than relying solely on a go-shop provision in the merger agreement, as well as the relative levels of interest that KBW expected other large banking companies headquartered in New England or upstate New York would have in considering a merger with Legacy. At the price reduction proposed byconclusion of the community bank was not merited, rejected the community bank’s proposal, and asked its advisors to request that the community bank increase its offer. At this time, theDecember 15 meeting, Legacy’s board of directors decided notauthorized senior management to proceed with its due diligence review ofcontinue negotiations based upon the community bank until the pricing issues were resolved.

The parties continued to discuss the terms of a possible agreement and exchanged various proposals to address the community bank’s due diligence concerns and Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s concerns about price. During this time, the community bank revised itsBerkshire proposal to increase the cash portion of the merger consideration to $11.62 per share and to reduce the fixed exchange ratio. On the date itif management was made, the second revised proposal resulted in aggregate merger consideration of $74.3 million, or $10.92 per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock (based on the community bank’s closing price on the NASDAQ Stock Market on date of the second revised proposal). Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its advisors continued to negotiatesatisfied with the community bank to attempt to increase the price of the transaction. During this time, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors held several meetings at which the negotiations were discussed in detail among the board and the company’s legal and financial advisors. At these meetings, the directors notedspecific go-shop terms that the community bank’s stock price had begun to fluctuate significantly, which, due to the fixed exchange ratio, meant that the transaction value to Rome Bancorp, Inc. also fluctuated significantly. As a result, the board became concerned about the downside risk of the community bank’s common stock if a transaction were to be consummated and asked the community bank to consider a floating exchange ratio that would fix the merger consideration at $11.25 per share.

On August 8, 2010, the parties agreed to extend the exclusivity period to the earlier of August 23, 2010 or the date on which either party terminated merger discussions. After the parties continued to negotiate over the next several days, the community bank asked Rome Bancorp, Inc. to consider its final offer, the financial terms of which had not changed from the second revised proposal. On August 16, 2010, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors met to consider the community bank’s final offer. As of the close of trading on August 13, 2010, the aggregate transaction value was $73.9 million, or $10.91 per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The board received presentations from Sandler O’Neill as to the financial terms of the community bank’s offer and SNR Denton US LLP as to the fiduciary duties of the board under Delaware law. After extensive discussion, based on its concern regarding the price per share being offered to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders, the significant downside risk of the community bank’s stock and the limited amount of cash consideration to serve to mitigate this downside risk, the board voted to reject the community bank’s offer andit


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

directed its advisorswas subsequently able to informnegotiate with Berkshire. The Legacy board of directors also expressed a preference that the community bank that it wouldexchange ratio be willing to proceed with discussions toward a definitive merger agreement ifbased upon the community bank was willing to offer arecent trading average of Berkshire stock, rather than the closing price of $11.25 per share withBerkshire common stock on a floating exchange ratio that would protect the price through closing. The board determined that it was prepared to continue to execute its independent business plan in the event that the community bank declined to increase its offer.particular date.

After subsequent discussions on December 15 between Mr. Daly and Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan, and between Sandler O’Neill and SNR Denton US LLP informedKBW, Berkshire and Legacy reached an understanding in principle on the community bank’s advisorsfollowing material terms. The go-shop period would last until January 31, 2011, and a termination fee equal to 2% of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board’s position later that day. The community bank declinedequity value of the transaction would apply if Legacy were to increaseterminate the price of its offer or to offer a floating exchange ratio, and formally terminated merger discussions on August 17, 2010.

On August 19, 2010, Sandler O’Neill, aware that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. was interested in acquiring a banking franchise in upstate New York, contacted Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. to determine its interest in a possible transaction with Rome Bancorp, Inc. On August 23, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. entered into a confidentiality agreement with Sandler O’Neill, pursuant to which Sandler O’Neill agreed to provide Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. with confidential and proprietary information about Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. agreed, among other things, to keep such information confidential and not to disclose such information except as set forth in the confidentiality agreement. On the same day, Michael P. Daly, President and Chief Executive Officer of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., met with Charles M. Sprock, President and Chief Executive Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc., to discuss a potential transaction between the companies. As a result of this discussion, Mr. Daly indicated that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. would be providing to Rome Bancorp, Inc. in the near future a proposal for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. to acquire Rome Bancorp, Inc.

In mid-August 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. engaged Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated as its financial advisor with respect to a possible acquisition of Rome Bancorp, Inc. On August 24, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. provided to Rome Bancorp, Inc. a non-binding proposal to enter into a merger agreement with Rome Bancorp, Inc. Pursuant to accept a Superior Proposal made during the terms of the proposal, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. offered to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Rome Bancorp, Inc. for a combination of cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Specifically, 80% of the merger consideration was to be paid in Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock with a fixed exchange ratio of 0.5921 and 20% of the merger consideration was to be paid in cash at $11.25 per share. Assuming a $19.00 per share price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, the aggregate transaction value was approximately $76.5 million, or $11.25 pergo-shop period. Each share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock outstanding. In addition, the proposal provided that each outstanding option to purchase shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock would be cancelledconverted into the right to receive 0.56385 shares of BHLB Common Stock and cashed out$1.30 in cash, with the exchange ratio being equal to 90% of the quotient obtained by dividing $13.00 by the average closing price of Berkshire’s stock for the greater of the cash out value of the option or $1.00 per option. The proposal also provided that Rome Bancorp, Inc. employment agreements, change-in-control agreements, and other existing management severance arrangements would be honored with any contractually due severance payments to be handled in a tax efficient manner. Employees of The Rome Savings Bank who became employees of Berkshire Bank would be eligible to participate in Berkshire Bank’s current employee benefits programs. Employees of The Rome Savings Bank who would not be retained by Berkshire Bankten-day period ended December 15, 2010. Legacy stockholders would be entitled to receive severance payments pursuant to Rome Bancorp’s existing severance plan or policy, or under Berkshire Bank’s current severance plan or policy, if such payments would be more favorable to such employees. The proposal provided that any definitive merger agreement would contain normal and customary representations, warranties and terms and conditions, including a termination fee equal to 5.0%half of the aggregate transaction value. The proposal also requiredamount by which the weighted average deposit premium received by Berkshire for divested deposits exceeds 3.5%, less applicable taxes on the portion of the premium in excess of 3.5%. Options on 422,900 shares of Legacy common stock exercisable at $16.03 that all Rome Bancorp, Inc.are held by directors and executive officers would execute share voting agreementsof Legacy and enter into customary non-competition agreements concurrently with the signing of a definitive merger agreement. The transactionLegacy Banks, other than such options held by Mr. Dunlaevy, would be subject toterminated in exchange for a cash payment of $3.00 per option share, and all other Legacy stock options, including options on 206,200 shares of Legacy common stock exercisable at $16.03 that are held by Mr. Dunlaevy, would be exchanged for Berkshire stock options having equivalent economic terms. (Mr. Sullivan does not hold any required regulatoryLegacy stock option exercisable at $16.03.)

Beginning on December 16, 2010 and stockholder approvals. The proposal was subject tocontinuing through December 21, 2010, Nutter McClennen & Fish exchanged drafts of the proposed merger agreement, voting agreement and related documents with Luse Gorman. Separately, Berkshire negotiated with counsel for Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan regarding the terms of Mr. Dunlaevy’s consulting agreement and Mr. Sullivan’s employment with Berkshire that would be effective upon the closing of the merger.

On December 20, 2010, the Legacy board of directors received an update from senior management regarding the status of the negotiations, a report from KBW regarding Legacy’s due diligence review of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire, and provided that, if Rome Bancorp, Inc. wished to accepta presentation from Nutter McClennen & Fish regarding the offer in principleterms of the proposed merger and proceed withvoting agreements. In addition, the negotiation of a definitive merger agreement, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. would require exclusivity in negotiations for a period of 30 days, during which Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. would work in good faith to complete its due diligence and execute a definitive merger agreement.

At its regularly scheduled meeting on August 25, 2010, theLegacy board of directors approved the amendment and restatement of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan to delete Section 11, which otherwise would have resulted in the issuance of 51,774 additional shares of Legacy common stock on a pro rata basis to those Legacy directors and employees who then were recipients of restricted stock grants. Of those 51,774 shares, 18,689 shares, or 36.1%, would have been issued to Mr. Dunlaevy, 11,934 shares, or 23.1%, would have been issued to the other directors of both Legacy and Legacy Banks, 11,259 shares, or 21.7%, would have been issued to those individuals who are directors of Legacy Banks only, and the remaining 9,892 shares, or 19.1%, would have been issued to Legacy employees other than Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan. (Mr. Sullivan would not have received an allocation under Section 11 of Legacy’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.)

At a meeting of the Berkshire board of directors held on December 20, 2010, the Berkshire board of directors discussed the terms of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s proposalthe proposed merger with Legacy. Sandler O’Neill and authorized managementLuse Gorman participated in the special meeting. Luse Gorman, which from time to proceedtime at past meetings had discussed with discussionsBerkshire’s board of directors the legal standards applicable to its decisions and actions with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. underrespect to its evaluation of merger proposals, reviewed the termsproposed transaction agreements and related information. Sandler O’Neill delivered an oral opinion to the effect that, as of December 21, 2010 and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in Sandler O’Neill’s written opinion, merger consideration to be received by the holders (other than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s August 24 proposal, includingand its affiliates) of Legacy common stock pursuant to the 30 day exclusivity period.Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. Sandler O’Neill also reviewed with the Berkshire board of directors the text of its fairness opinion, which is attached to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Appendix C. Following these board deliberations, Berkshire’s board of directors determined that the merger, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of Berkshire and its stockholders, and the directors voted unanimously to approve the merger and other transactions, and to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the other agreements and related matters, subject to the resolution of open issues in a manner satisfactory to Berkshire.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On August 27,December 21, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. entered into a confidentialityBerkshire and Legacy finalized the merger and voting agreements and related documents, including Mr. Dunlaevy’s consulting agreement and Mr. Sullivan’s terms of employment with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., dated August 24, 2010, pursuant to which Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. agreed to provide Rome Bancorp, Inc. with confidential and proprietary information about Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. agreed, among other things, to keep such information confidential and not to disclose such information except as set forth inthat would be effective upon the confidentiality agreement.

On August 26, 2010, Sandler O’Neill provided Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and its legal and financial advisors with access to an electronic data room so that it could begin its due diligence reviewclosing of Rome Bancorp, Inc. From August 27, 2010 through September 10, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and its advisors and consultants conducted their due diligence reviewthe merger. At a full day meeting of Rome Bancorp, Inc.

On August 30, 2010, SNR Denton US LLP transmitted a draft merger agreement to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.

On September 8, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. provided Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its legal and financial advisors with access to an electronic data room so that it could begin its due diligence review of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Rome Bancorp, Inc. management, SNR Denton US LLP and Sandler O’Neill began conducting a due diligence review of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. shortly after gaining access to the data room.

On September 15, 2010, at a meeting at Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s offices, Mr. Daly informed Mr. Sprock that, based on its due diligence review, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. would reduce the price per share included in its August 24, 2010 proposal from $11.25 per share to $10.75 per share. Mr. Daly informed Mr. Sprock that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. was bidding on another bank located in New York state and that the strategic value of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s franchise to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. could increase if Berkshire Hills Bancorp was the winning bidder for this other bank. As a result, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. would not be submitting a formal revised proposal to Rome Bancorp, Inc. until it knew whether or not it was the winning bidder for such bank. Mr. Sprock expressed disagreement with the proposed reduction in price and requested Mr. Daly to ask the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Legacy board of directors on December 21, 2010, Nutter McClennen & Fish, which from time to consider increasing the price of its proposal, whether or not it was the winning bidder for the other New York bank. As a result of this conversation, Rome Bancorp temporarily halted its due diligence review of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., but agreed to continue to provide Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.time at past meetings had discussed with any information that it needed in order to prepare its revised proposal.

Over the next week, representatives of Sandler O’Neill had several discussions with Mr. Daly regarding the status of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s bid for the other New York bank and the potential for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. to increase the price in its most recent proposal.

On September 24, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. was notified that it was not the winning bidder for the other bank located in New York state. Following this notification, Mr. Sprock asked Mr. Daly to increase the price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s latest offer even though it was not the winning bidder for the other New York bank. In response to Mr. Sprock’s request, Mr. Daly, as authorized by the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Legacy’s board of directors agreedthe legal standards applicable to increaseits decisions and actions with respect to its evaluation of merger proposals, reviewed the merger and voting agreements and related information.

Among other things, the Legacy board of directors considered that under the proposed merger agreement options on 422,900 shares of Legacy common stock exercisable at $16.03 that are held by directors of and executive officers of Legacy and Legacy Banks, other than those held by Mr. Dunlaevy, would be terminated in exchange for a cash consideration from 20%payment of $3.00 per option share. Legacy’s board of directors was aware of the provisions of Legacy’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, which authorized the Legacy board to 30%cancel outstanding options in exchange for a cash payment having an aggregate value equal to the value of such options, as determined by the Legacy board of directors in its sole discretion. Taking into account the course of negotiation with Berkshire and the information provided to the Legacy board of directors regarding the valuation of those options using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, the Legacy board of directors concluded that the $3.00 cash payment for such options under the Merger Agreement was a fair value for those options for purposes of the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.

Also at the December 21, 2010 meeting, KBW reviewed its updated financial analysis of the merger consideration provided under the final form of Merger Agreement, and to increaseat the per share valuerequest of the cash consideration from $10.75 per share to $11.25 per share.

On September 28, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. provided to Rome Bancorp, Inc. a revised non-binding proposal to enter into a merger agreement, which was approved by the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s Board of Directors, in consultation with its executive management and financial and legal advisors. Pursuant to the terms of the revised proposal, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. offered to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Rome Bancorp, Inc. for a combination of cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Specifically, 70% of the merger consideration was to be paid in Berkshire Hills Bancorp common stock with a fixed exchange ratio of 0.5658 and 30% of the merger consideration was to be paid in cash at $11.25 per share. Based on a $18.63 per share price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock (the closing price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock on the date of the proposal), the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

aggregate transaction value was approximately $73.1 million or $10.75 per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock outstanding. The other terms of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s August 24, 2010 proposal remained unchanged.

On October 1, 2010, theLegacy board of directors, of Rome Bancorp, Inc. met to discuss Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s revised proposal. Each director had been notified of the revised terms of the proposal and provided with additional information about Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. in advance of the meeting. Each director also was provided with a copy of presentation materials prepared by Sandler O’Neill at the meeting. Sandler O’Neill reviewed with the board the presentation materials, including the terms of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s most recent proposal. When made, the proposal was valued at $10.75 per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock, but had risen to $10.88 per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock on the date of the meeting due toKBW delivered an increase in Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s stock price since the date of the proposal. Sandler O’Neill expressed its view that it did not believe that there were any other banks that had both the financial ability and the interest to acquire Rome Bancorp, Inc. under terms comparable to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s proposal. Sandler O’Neill reviewed a number of key financial metrics relatingopinion to the proposal, includingeffect that, as of December 21, 2010 and based upon and subject to the price to last twelve months earnings per share, the price to tangible book value, the price to adjusted tangible book value, the core deposit premiumfactors and the market premium of the proposed transactions compared to comparable bank M&A transactions in the Northeast since January 1, 2009 and indicated that the proposed transaction was comparable to other transactions based on the metricsassumptions set forth in the presentation materials. Sandler O’Neill also reviewed the historical value of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock price and the adjusted value of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock at the 0.5658 exchange ratio and concluded that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders would receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock near the low end of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s trading range, which could provide Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders with significant potential upside in the stock consideration they would receive in a merger. Sandler O’Neill then provided an overview of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s franchise, including its branch footprint, financial performance, loan portfolio, deposit composition, comparison of its financial performance compared to a peer group, and management team. Sandler O’Neill also mentioned that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s analyst ratings included two buy ratings and two hold ratings. SNR Denton US LLP provided the board with a detailed overview of the director’s fiduciary duties under Delaware law. After extensive discussion, the board unanimously voted to proceed with a transaction under the terms of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s most recent proposal, contingent on the satisfactory conclusion of due diligence on Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and the negotiation of a definitive merger agreement.

From October 1, 2010 through October 6, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its legal and financial advisors conducted a due diligence review of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and participated in informational and due diligence sessions at which Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s management team made presentations regarding Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and its business, reviewed matters from Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s due diligence request list and responded to questions from Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its advisors concerning a variety of matters including financial matters, accounting practices, credit quality, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s regulatory profile and legal matters.

On October 4, 2010, the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. board of directors held a special meeting to review and consider the proposed transaction with Rome Bancorp, Inc. Mr. Daly provided an update of the negotiations with Rome Bancorp, Inc. and reviewed a presentation on Rome Bancorp, Inc. and the proposed business combination with Rome Bancorp, Inc. Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. provided the board with a detailed overview of the directors’ fiduciary duties under Delaware law, and reviewed the material terms of the merger and the proposed draft merger agreement. Representatives of Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated then addressed the fairness to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. ofKBW’s written opinion, the merger consideration to be paidreceived by the holders of Legacy common stock (other than Berkshire and its affiliates) pursuant to the stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., from a financial point of view, including a review of a presentation outlining the proposed transaction multiples and transaction structure, an overview of Rome Bancorp, Inc., a comparable group analysis and a review of the methodology and assumptions used to arrive at the valuation of Rome Bancorp, Inc., and responded to questions by the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. board of directors. The Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. board of directors approved the merger agreement, with such further drafting changes as approved by Mr. Daly in consultation


TABLE OF CONTENTS

with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s legal and financial advisors, provided that any such changes did not effect the pricing or other material terms of the merger agreement.

Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., legal counsel to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. provided SNR Denton US LLP with a revised draft of a definitive merger agreement on October 5, 2010. The parties and their legal advisors negotiated the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and related documents over the course of the next several days.

On October 8, 2010, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors held a special meeting to review and consider the proposed transaction with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Copies of presentation materials from Sandler O’Neill, as well as the merger agreement and related materials, were distributed to the members of the board in advance of the meeting. SNR Denton US LLP discussed the status of negotiations with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. regarding certain provisions of the merger agreement and related documents and summarized the key terms that had been arrived at by the parties, including those related to price, the amount of the termination fee, the ability of the board to consider unsolicited alternative proposals from other parties, and the obligations of the parties to obtain the required regulatory approvals for the transaction. SNR Denton US LLP also reviewed the several other issues that had recently been resolved, including restoring certain exclusions to the definition of material adverse effect; the merger of the bank’s charitable foundation into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s charitable foundation along with a commitment from Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. that the assets of Rome Bancorp, Inc. charitable foundation continue to be used for the benefit of the Rome community; ensuring that ESOP participants would be able to elect cash or stock just like other stockholders; negotiation of certain negative covenants by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.; finalizing the settlement agreements and change of control payout terms for officers of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and/or The Rome Savings Bank with employment contracts or change in control agreements; negotiating the terms of a consulting agreement and non-compete agreement between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Mr. Sprock in order to address Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s concerns under Section 280G of the Tax Code; and increasing the cap on the cost of director and officer liability insurance tail coverage. SNR Denton US LLP also reported on the results of the due diligence review of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. conducted by Rome Bancorp, Inc. management, SNR Denton US LLP and Sandler O’Neill. Sandler O’Neill then presented its financial analysis of the proposed transaction. Sandler O’Neill reviewed the financial terms of the proposed transaction and summarized the strategic and financial rationale for the transaction for both Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and responded to questions by the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board. Sandler O’Neill then delivered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of the date of its opinion and subject to the limitations, qualifications, factors and assumptions set forth therein, the merger consideration to be paid to the stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such stockholders. SNR Denton US LLP providedholders. KBW also reviewed with the Legacy board of directors the text of its fairness opinion, which was delivered to Legacy at the conclusion of that meeting and is attached to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Appendix B. KBW assumed for purposes of its opinion that the weighted average deposit premium received by Berkshire for the divested deposits would not exceed 3.5% and therefore no additional payment would be made to Legacy stockholders under that provision of the Merger Agreement.

Throughout the December 21, 2010 meeting, Legacy’s senior management, KBW and Nutter McClennen & Fish responded to questions from Legacy’s board of directors. Following KBW’s presentation the Legacy board of directors held an executive session with a detailed overview of directors’ fiduciary duties under Delaware lawnon-independent directors excused, at which the independent directors unanimously supported the proposed merger and reviewed the material terms of the merger and the draft merger agreement with the board, and responded to questions by the board. After further discussion among the directors, Sandler O’Neill and SNR Denton US LLP including the factors described under“— Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors,” the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Merger Agreement. Following these deliberations, Legacy’s board of directors, unanimously determinedhaving concluded that the mergerMerger Agreement, the Merger and the merger agreement wererelated transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy and its stockholders, voted unanimously approvedto approve the Merger and related transactions and to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the other agreements and related matters. The Legacy board of directors also unanimously recommended that Legacy stockholders approve and adopt the Merger Agreement. In approving the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the related transactions, the Legacy board of directors noted the potential conflict of interest of Messrs. Dunlaevy and Sullivan, because of Mr. Dunlaevy’s consulting agreement with Berkshire and Berkshire’s employment offer to Mr. Sullivan, and was aware of the other interests of Legacy’s officers and directors in the merger agreementdescribed in the section of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus titled “Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger” beginning on page 73.

Also at the December 21, 2010 meeting, the Legacy board of directors discussed with KBW and related actions, and recommended that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders vote in favorNutter McClennen & Fish the go-shop process to be conducted after the signing of the approvalMerger Agreement.

Later on December 21, 2010, after the close of the merger agreement.

The parties entered intoNASDAQ markets, Legacy and Berkshire each executed and delivered the merger agreement on October 12, 2010Merger Agreement and announced the transaction inissued a joint press release announcing the Merger Agreement and the proposed merger.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Developments after Execution of Merger Agreement

During the December 21, 2010 meeting of the Legacy board of directors, the Legacy board of directors determined that Legacy’s Mergers and Acquisitions Committee should oversee the go-shop process and evaluate the status of potentially interested parties on a regular basis. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on January 31, 2011, Legacy and its advisors were able to initiate, solicit and encourage any alternative acquisition proposals from third parties, provide non-public information, and participate in discussions and negotiate with third parties with respect to alternative acquisition proposals. During the go-shop period, KBW informed 13 other banking companies of the “go-shop” period. These parties were selected by the Legacy board of directors (or its Mergers and Acquisitions Committee), in consultation with KBW. None of those possible buyers sought access to non-public Legacy information, engaged in other discussions with Legacy or its advisors, or made or indicated any intention to make an alternative acquisition proposal prior to the opening of trading on that day. Each company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC which summarized the material termsexpiration of the merger agreement“go-shop” period. After 11:59 p.m. on January 31, 2011, Legacy and included a copy of the executed merger agreement as an exhibit to the report.

Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors

At a meeting held on October 8, 2010, after a careful review of the facts and circumstances relating to the merger, by unanimous vote (i) approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, (ii) determined thatits advisors ceased all go-shop activities in accordance with the terms of the merger agreementMerger Agreement. See “— Covenants of Legacy and the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby are fair to, andBerkshire Hills in the best interestsMerger Agreement — Not to Solicit Other Proposals” beginning on page 81 of Rome Bancorp, Inc.this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. After the expiration of the “go shop” period and through the date of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, no one has sought access to non-public Legacy information, engaged in other discussions with Legacy or its advisors, or made or indicated an intention to make an alternative acquisition proposal.

Legacy’s 2011 Management Financial Projections

In 2010, Legacy’s senior management developed a set of internal financial projections covering the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012 in connection with Legacy’s capital planning process. These projections sometimes are referred to in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as the “Legacy’s Management Projections.” A subset of Legacy’s Management Projections is included below.

Legacy does not, as a matter of course, publicly disclose projections of future revenues or earnings. During the period leading up to the Merger Agreement, however, Legacy’s senior management provided Legacy’s Management Projections to Legacy’s board of directors, KBW, Berkshire and Sandler O’Neill. Legacy has included in this section a condensed version of Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 to give Legacy stockholders access to certain non-public information for purposes of considering and evaluating the Merger. Legacy’s Management Projections were not prepared with a view to compliance with published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective financial information.

Legacy’s Management Projections have been prepared by, and are the responsibility of, Legacy’s management. Wolf & Company, P.C., the independent registered public accounting firm of Legacy (and Berkshire for the year ended December 31, 2010), has neither examined nor compiled Legacy’s Management Projections, and accordingly, Wolf & Company does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. Wolf & Company’s report on Legacy’s consolidated financial statements in Legacy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, relates to Legacy’s historical financial information. It does not extend to Legacy’s Management Projections and should not be read to do so.

In preparing Legacy’s Management Projections, Legacy’s management took into account Legacy’s historical performance, combined with management’s estimates regarding future levels of investments, loans, deposits and borrowings, operating income, provision for loan losses and income taxes. Legacy’s Management Projections were developed in a manner consistent with management’s historical development of budgets and were not developed for public disclosure. Although Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 are presented with numerical specificity, these projections reflect numerous assumptions and estimates as to future events made by Legacy’s management that Legacy’s management believed were reasonable at the time Legacy’s Management Projections were prepared. Legacy believes that Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 are not reflective of the manner in which Berkshire would operate Legacy after the Merger. In addition, factors such as industry performance and general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions, all of which are difficult to predict and beyond the control of Legacy’s management, may cause Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 or the underlying assumptions to be inaccurate. Such factors include those that are more particularly described under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Legacy’s Annual Report on


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Legacy’s Management Projections will be realized, and actual results may be materially greater or less than those contained in Legacy’s Management Projections. The inclusion of a condensed version of Legacy’s Management Projections in this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus should not be regarded as an indication that Legacy’s board of directors, KBW, Berkshire or Sandler O’Neill considered, or now considers, Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 to be a reliable prediction of future results and such projections should not be relied on as such.

Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 reflected management’s assessment, at that time, of Legacy’s prospects given its current operating environment. Legacy does not intend to update or otherwise revise Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 to reflect circumstances existing after the date when made or to reflect the occurrence of future events even in the event that any or all of the assumptions underlying Legacy’s Management Projections are shown to be in error.

KBW relied upon Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011, which are presented in a condensed format below, in connection with its financial and valuation analyses, including its discounted cash flow analysis, which was among the factors considered by KBW in its opinion to Legacy’s board of directors. See “— Opinion of Legacy’s Financial Advisor” beginning on page 50.

 
 Condensed
Management
Projections
For the Year Ending
December 31, 2011
   (Dollars in millions, except per share data)
Net interest income $26.7 
Non-interest income $6.7 
Provision for Loan Losses $2.3 
Net income $3.1 
Earnings per share $0.39 

Recommendation of the Legacy Board of Directors; Legacy’s Reasons for the Merger

Recommendation of the Legacy Board of Directors

The Legacy board of directors unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of Legacy and its stockholders, adopted the Merger Agreement and (iii) resolved to recommendapproved the merger, and recommended that Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders approve and adopt the adoptionMerger Agreement. In connection with the foregoing, the board considered the opinion of KBW, Legacy’s financial advisor, in making its recommendation. For more information on KBW’s opinion, see the section of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus titled “— Opinion of Legacy’s Financial Advisor” beginning on page 50.

THE LEGACY BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.

Reasons for the Merger

The Legacy board of directors, in reaching its determination, consulted with Legacy’s senior management, KBW and Nutter McClennen & Fish, drew on its knowledge of Legacy’s business, operations, properties, assets, financial condition, operating results, historical market prices and prospects, and considered the following factors in favor of the merger, agreementwhich are not presented in order of priority:

a review of the historical financial statements of Legacy and directed that this matter be submittedBerkshire and certain other internal information, primarily financial in nature, relating to the respective businesses, earnings, and financial condition of Legacy and Berkshire;
the respective business strategies of Legacy and Berkshire, prospects for the future, including expected financial results, and expectations relating to the proposed Merger, based on discussions with management of Legacy and Berkshire;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the geographic fit and increased customer convenience of the branch networks of Legacy Banks and Berkshire Bank;
the compatibility of the banking cultures and business and management philosophies of Legacy and Berkshire, particularly with respect to customer service and convenience, and the meeting of local banking needs;
the effect of the Merger on Legacy customers and the communities served by Legacy, including the effect of an increase in the legal lending limit available to borrowers of the combined bank by reason of the merger;
the effect on Legacy customers and the communities served by Legacy of Berkshire’s longstanding history of serving the customers and communities in the Berkshire County and the Capital District region of New York through Berkshire’s own efforts as well as through the contributions of Berkshire’s charitable foundation;
the continuation of The Legacy Banks charitable foundation;
the amount of the Merger consideration, its premium to Legacy’s trading price in the period preceding the announcement of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders at a special meeting.

In reaching its determination and making its recommendation described above, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board consulted with members of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s senior managementMerger and its comparability with respect to other premiums, and the belief of the Legacy board of directors that Berkshire common stock represents an investment in a well-capitalized institution which should result in long-term value and increased liquidity for Legacy stockholders;

the fact that the Merger consideration is expected to be tax-free to Legacy stockholders to the extent that they receive Berkshire common stock in exchange for their shares of Legacy common stock;
the fact that even though Legacy no longer will exist as an independent, stand-alone company, Legacy stockholders will participate in the growth of Berkshire and in any synergies resulting from the Merger and retain the potential to receive an additional market premium if at some future time Berkshire is acquired;
the higher dividend rate paid by Berkshire;
the then current financial market conditions, and legal advisors. The material factors consideredhistorical market prices, volatility and trading information with respect to Legacy common stock, including the possibility that if Legacy remained as an independent publicly-owned corporation, in the event of a decline in the market price of Legacy common stock or the stock market in general, the price that might be received by holders of Legacy common stock in the Rome Bancorp, Inc.open market or in a future transaction might be less than the Merger consideration;
the fact that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby were the product of arms’ length negotiations between representatives of Legacy and representatives of Berkshire;
the presentation of KBW (including the assumptions and methodologies underlying the analyses in connection therewith) and the opinion of KBW to Legacy’s board eachdated December 21, 2010, a copy of which it believes supportis attached to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Appendix B and which you should read carefully in its determinationentirety, which expresses KBW’s view that, as of December 21, 2010, and recommendations arebased on and subject to the factors, limitations and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the Merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to holders of Legacy common stock;
the anticipated effect of the acquisition on Legacy employees (including the fact that Legacy employees who do not continue as follows:

Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s operating and financial condition and prospects.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board concluded that the merger provides a better alternative to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders than remaining independent as a result of the risks and uncertainties associated with remaining independent and attempting to implement Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s strategic plans. In reaching this conclusion, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s current and historical financial condition and results of operations, its near and long term prospects and strategic objectives and the current and potential economic, competitive and operating conditions in the various markets in which Rome Bancorp, Inc. does business. In particular, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s historical revenues and revenue expectations over the near and long term, its prospects for achieving continued revenue and earnings growth given continued downward pricing pressures, the execution risks involved in implementing Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s business plan, including the local and national economic environment, the increasingly competitive environment for small community banks, the increased regulatory burden expected to arise from the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act, the earnings and growth challenges of doing business in the company’s market area, potential succession planning issues, and the risks inherent in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s business model, as well as the other risks and uncertainties discussed in the“Risk Factors” section of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC.
Future prospects of Berkshire Hill Bancorp, Inc.  The board considered the historical revenues and revenue expectations of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. over the near and long term and concluded that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s earnings and prospects make it more likely that the combined company will have superior future earnings and prospects compared to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s earnings and prospects on an independent basis.
Financial terms and premium to historical trading prices.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the relationship of the merger consideration to the historical and recent market prices of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The directors considered that the merger consideration represented a 16.9% market premium to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s trading price on the NASDAQ Stock Market on October 7, 2010, the date prior to the meeting; a 5.8% core deposit premium over tangible book value; a price of 19.2x last twelve months earnings; a price of 20.7x estimated 2010 earnings; a price to tangible book value of 119%; a price to adjusted tangible book value of 136%; and that these financial metrics were comparable to those other merger and acquisition transactions in the region. The board also considered that Sandler O’Neill’s net present value analysis showed that the value of the merger consideration exceeded the net present value of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock; that the more active trading market for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock would provide more liquidity to stockholders than Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock and would provide stockholders; and that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, inc. common stock would provide a comparable cash dividend to Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock.
Sandler O’Neill fairness opinion.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the financial analyses presented by Sandler O’Neill at the October 8, 2010 meeting of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board and the opinion of Sandler O’Neill, delivered orally at the October 8, 2010 meeting and subsequently confirmed in writing on October 12, 2010 to the effect that, as of that date and based upon and subject to the limitations, qualifications, factors and assumptions set forth therein, the merger consideration to be received by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. The full text of the written opinion of
employees of Berkshire or Berkshire Bank will be entitled to receive severance benefits);
the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, including:
the go-shop provision, which through January 31, 2011 permitted Legacy and its advisors to initiate, solicit and encourage any inquiry or the making of any proposal or offer that could constitute an acquisition proposal, provide non-public information relating to Legacy, participate

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sandler O’Neill, which sets forth assumptions made, procedures followed, matters consideredin discussions and limitations on the review undertaken in connectionnegotiate with the opinion, is attached as Annex B hereto and is incorporated herein by reference. For a further discussion of Sandler O’Neill’s opinion, see“— Opinion of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s Financial Advisor” below.
Terms of merger agreement.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board believed that the terms of the merger agreement, taken as a whole, were favorable to Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its stockholders, including, among other terms, the adequacy of the merger consideration, the obligation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.third parties with respect to regulatory approvals, Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s ability toacquisition proposals and terminate the merger agreement in connection withMerger Agreement, upon the receipt of an unsolicited superior proposal, the limited conditionspayment to closing, the absenceBerkshire of a financing condition,termination fee of $2,160,000, to pursue a Superior Proposal made during the limitations and exceptions included in the material adverse effect definition and the fact that the merger agreement is subject to approval by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders.go-shop period;
Tax free reorganization.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered that the merger would be a tax free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes and that stockholders receiving stock consideration would not recognize gain or loss on the exchange of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stock.
Choice of cash or stock.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors considered the provisions of the merger agreement that afford Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders the opportunity to participate in the growth of the combined company through the stock component of the merger consideration or to receive cash for their shares through the cash component of the merger consideration.
Likelihood of regulatory approval.  The board considered Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s regulatory profile, which the board believed contributed to the likelihood that required regulatory and stockholder approvals will be obtained in a timely manner and that the merger will be completed.
Results of due diligence review.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the results of the due diligence investigation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. conducted by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s management and financial and legal advisors.
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s business reputation.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the business reputation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and its management, the substantial financial resources of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., including experience related to integration of acquired businesses, which the directors believed supported the conclusion that the merger could be completed relatively quickly and in an orderly manner.
Enhanced products and services.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered management’s view that the merger will allow for enhanced opportunities for Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s customers, including introduction of new products and services particularly in the insurance, wealth management and commercial cash management areas.
Opportunities for employees.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered management’s view that the limited geographic overlap between the two companies will minimize the impact of the merger on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s employees.
Advisory board.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s agreement to establish an advisory board comprised of certain Rome Bancorp, Inc. directors in order to provide continuity and leadership in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s local community and markets.
Likelihood of alternative transaction proposals.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered whether parties other than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. would be interested in and capable of entering into a transaction with Rome Bancorp, Inc. that would provide value to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders that was superior to the price to be paid pursuant to the merger. As part of its analysis, the directors considered the views of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s senior management and Sandler O’Neill. The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board concluded that in light of the lack of acquirers that would be both potentially interested in a transaction with Rome Bancorp, Inc. and capable of completing a transaction that was superior to the price to be paid pursuant to the merger, the belief that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s
the ability of the Legacy board of directors, under certain circumstances after January 31, 2011 but prior to the adoption of the Merger Agreement by Legacy stockholders, to furnish information to and conduct negotiations with a third party and terminate the Merger Agreement, upon the payment to Berkshire of a termination fee of $4,320,000, to accept a Superior Proposal; and
the Legacy board of directors’ belief that in either case the termination fee payable to Berkshire was reasonable in the context of termination fees that were payable in other comparable transactions and likely would not preclude another party from making a competing proposal;
the likelihood that the Merger will be consummated in light of the conditions to Berkshire’s obligation to consummate the merger, including the definition under the Merger Agreement of Material Adverse Effect as it pertains to the risk of divestiture;
the treatment of Legacy equity awards under the Merger Agreement;
provisions requiring Berkshire to share with Legacy stockholders any deposit premium in excess of 3.5% that Berkshire receives for divested deposits (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium);
the fact that approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement would require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Legacy common stock entitled to vote;
a review of the risks and prospects of Legacy remaining independent, including the uncertainty regarding the potential for higher capital requirements and an increase in the cost of regulatory compliance as a consequence of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was enacted on July 21, 2010, and the regulations expected to be adopted pursuant to that Act;
the fact that Mr. Dunlaevy and another Legacy director to be designated by Berkshire will become directors of Berkshire effective upon the completion of the merger;
the fact that Berkshire has committed under the Merger Agreement to designate Legacy’s current executive offices at 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts as the headquarters of Berkshire and Berkshire Bank; and
the fact that Berkshire has committed under the Merger Agreement that, subject to regulatory approval, Berkshire will include the “Legacy” name in the name of Berkshire Bank’s branch offices in Berkshire County and will continue to do so for at least two years after the completion of the merger, or, if earlier, until such time as Berkshire Bank rebrands its banking offices in Berkshire County.

The Legacy board of directors also was aware that all Legacy directors and executive officers, who collectively owned approximately 360,386 shares of Legacy common stock, would enter into a voting agreement with Berkshire contemporaneously with the execution of the Merger Agreement and that pursuant to such voting agreements, Legacy’s directors and executive officers would agree to vote the shares held by them in favor of the approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement. The Legacy board of directors understood that such voting agreements were a condition to Berkshire entering into the Merger Agreement and such voting agreements will terminate in the event that the Merger Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms.

In the course of the Legacy board of directors’ deliberations, it also considered a variety of risks and other countervailing factors, including:

the risks and costs to Legacy if the Merger is not completed, including:

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

common stock was trading on the low end of its trading range, which could provide Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders with significant potential upside in the stock consideration they would receive in a merger, and the price offered by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., it was unlikely that any party would propose an alternative transaction that would be more favorable to Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its stockholders than the merger.
the diversion of management and employee attention, potential employee attrition and the resulting effect on Legacy’s customers and business relationships; and
the market price of Legacy common stock, as the market price could be affected by many factors, including (1) the reason or reasons for which the Merger Agreement was terminated and whether such termination resulted from factors adversely affecting Legacy; (2) Legacy’s then current operating and financial results, which could be variable; (3) the possibility that, as a result of the termination of the Merger Agreement, the marketplace would consider Legacy to be an unattractive acquisition candidate; and (4) the possible sale of shares of Legacy common stock by short-term investors (such as arbitrageurs) following an announcement of termination of the Merger Agreement;
the fact that federal banking regulators and the Department of Justice likely will require the combined bank to divest deposits, loans and branch locations in Berkshire County in order to mitigate the increase in market concentration resulting from the Merger, and the uncertainty associated with the amount and composition of such divestiture;
the risk that the time necessary for federal banking regulators and the Department of Justice to determine the amount and composition of deposits, loans and branch locations in Berkshire County to be divested, and to approve the purchaser or purchasers of such divested deposits, may delay the receipt of one or more regulatory approvals to complete the merger;
the fact that the Merger consideration, consisting primarily of shares of Berkshire common stock, provides less certainty of value to Legacy stockholders compared to a transaction in which they would receive only cash consideration;
the restrictions that the Merger Agreement imposes (after the expiration of the go-shop period on January 31, 2011) on Legacy actively soliciting competing acquisition proposals, and the fact that Legacy would be obligated to pay a $2,160,000 termination fee to terminate the Merger Agreement to pursue a Superior Proposal made during the go-shop period and a $4,320,000 termination fee to terminate the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal made after the go-shop period;
the fact that gains from the cash component of the merger consideration would generally be taxable to Legacy’s U.S. stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and
Ability to respond to unsolicited acquisition proposals.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered that while Rome Bancorp, Inc. is prohibited from soliciting a transaction proposal from any other party, the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board is permitted to consider a “competing proposal” and provide information to and enter into discussions and negotiations with the person making that proposal, if it determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial and outside legal advisors, that such competing proposal is or is reasonably likely to lead to a “superior proposal” and that a failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
Ability to terminate the merger agreement to accept a “superior proposal.”  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board viewed favorably the fact that, subject to the paymentinterests of the $3.5 million termination fee (representing approximately 5.0% of the total value of the proposed transaction) and compliance with certain other requirements included in the merger agreement, it is permitted to change its recommendation regarding the merger, terminate the merger agreement and pursue an alternative transaction with another party if the directors have determined that the proposal made by that party constitutes a “superior proposal.”

The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board also considered potential risks relating to the merger, including the following:

Potential decrease in value.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. considered that the stock consideration in the merger is a fixed exchange ratio of shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock, and that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders therefore could be adversely affected by a decrease in the trading price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock during the pendency of the merger.
Receipt of merger consideration not elected by the stockholders.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders may receive a form of merger consideration different from what they elect. The consideration to be received by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders in the merger is subject to the requirement that 70% of the shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock be exchanged for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and the remaining 30% be exchanged for cash. The merger agreement contains proration and allocation methods to achieve this desired result. If a stockholder elects all cash and the available cash is oversubscribed, then the stockholder will receive a portion of the merger consideration in Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. If a stockholder elects all stock and the available stock is oversubscribed, then the stockholder will receive a portion of the merger consideration in cash.
Integration risk.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the risk that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may be unable to successfully integrate Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s operations or retain Rome Bancorp, Inc’s employees and that, if it does not do so successfully, it may not be able to realize the benefits of the merger.
Potential adverse effect on Rome Bancorp, Inc. if merger is not completed.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the possible disruption to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s operations following the public announcement of the merger, and the possible substantial harm to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s business and competitive position, including its relationships with customers, vendors and employees, if the merger is not completed.
Effects on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s ability to conduct business pending completion of the merger.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the restrictions on the conduct of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s business prior to the completion of the merger, requiring Rome Bancorp, Inc. to conduct its business only in the ordinary course and to take certain actions or refraining from taking certain actions,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

subject to specific exceptions, which may delay or prevent Rome Bancorp, Inc. from pursuing business opportunities that may arise that it would otherwise pursue.
Potential effects of termination fee on alternative transaction proposals.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the existence of a $3.5 million termination fee payable in certain circumstances by Rome Bancorp, Inc. to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. that would make it more costly for another potential purchaser to acquire Rome Bancorp, Inc. and, therefore, might have the effect of discouraging other potential purchasers from making a competing proposal to acquire Rome Bancorp, Inc.
Restrictions on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s ability to solicit and consider alternative transaction proposals.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the terms of the merger agreement prohibiting Rome Bancorp, Inc. from soliciting proposals to acquire the company as an alternative to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s proposal and placing certain other limitations on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s ability to consider unsolicited alternative transaction proposals and to terminate the merger agreement and accept an alternative transaction proposal that constitutes a “superior proposal.”
Interests of certain persons in the proposed merger.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the fact that Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s executiveLegacy’s officers and directors may have interests in the transaction that are different from, orMerger described in addition to, thosethe section of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s other stockholders. See“Intereststhis Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus titled “Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger That Are Different Than Yours”Merger” beginning on page 52.
Requirement to obtain regulatory approvals as a condition to closing.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the fact that completion of the merger is subject to regulatory approvals for multiple bank regulatory agencies and there can be no assurance that these approvals will be received prior to the termination date in the merger agreement, after which time Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. can terminate the merger agreement.
Expenditures of significant transaction costs and resources if merger is not completed.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board considered the negative impact of the merger not being completed, including that Rome Bancorp, Inc. will have incurred significant transaction costs and that Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s directors, management and employees will have expended significant time and effort and experienced significant distractions from their work.
Risk factors.  The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board also considered the risks described in the section entitled“Risk Factors” beginning on page 973.

The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes all materialdoes set forth the principal factors considered by Legacy’s board of directors. The Legacy board of directors collectively reached the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board.unanimous conclusion to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger in light of the various factors described above and other factors that each member of the Legacy board of directors determined was appropriate. In view of the wide variety of factors considered by the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity of thesethose matters, the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy board of directors did not consider it practical, and therefore did not attempt, to quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors it considered in reaching its decision. Rather, the Legacy board of directors is making its recommendation based on the totality of information presented to and the investigation conducted by it. In considering the factors discussed above, individual Legacy directors may have given different weights to different factors.

Opinion of Legacy Bancorp, Inc.’s Financial Advisor

On December 9, 2010 Legacy engaged KBW to render financial advisory and investment banking services to Legacy. KBW agreed to assist Legacy in assessing the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger with Berkshire Hills to the stockholders of Legacy. Legacy selected KBW because KBW is a nationally recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in transactions similar to the merger


TABLE OF CONTENTS

and is familiar with Legacy and its business. As part of its investment banking business, KBW is continually engaged in the valuation of financial services companies and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions.

Other than with respect to the proposed Merger, the only relationship that existed during the past two years between KBW and Legacy occurred in late 2008 when Legacy paid KBW $10,000 for KBW’s services in connection with Legacy’s consideration of a possible bank acquisition that it ultimately did not pursue.

As part of its engagement, a representative of KBW attended the meeting of the Legacy board of directors held on December 21, 2010, at which the Legacy board of directors evaluated the proposed merger with Berkshire Hills. At this meeting, KBW reviewed the financial aspects of the proposed merger and rendered an opinion that, as of such date, the consideration offered to Legacy stockholders in the merger was fair from a financial point of view. The Legacy board of directors approved the merger agreement at this meeting.

The full text of KBW’s written opinion is attached as Appendix B to this document and is incorporated herein by reference. Legacy stockholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by KBW. The description of the opinion set forth herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion.

KBW's opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion. The opinion is directed to the Legacy board of directors and addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration offered to the Legacy stockholders. It does not address the underlying business decision to proceed with the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any Legacy shareholder as to how the shareholder should vote at the Legacy special meeting on the merger or any related matter.

In rendering its opinion, KBW:

reviewed, among other things,
the merger agreement;
Annual Reports to Stockholders and Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the three years ended December 31, 2009 of Legacy and Berkshire Hills;
certain interim reports to stockholders and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q of Legacy and Berkshire Hills and certain other communications from Legacy and Berkshire Hills to their respective stockholders; and
other financial information concerning the businesses and operations of Legacy and Berkshire Hills furnished to KBW by Legacy and Berkshire Hills for purposes of KBW’s analysis, including Legacy’s Management Projections (see “— Legacy’s 2011 Management Financial Projections” beginning on page 46 of this proxy statement-prospectus);
held discussions with members of senior management of Legacy and Berkshire Hills regarding
past and current business operations;
regulatory relations;
financial condition; and
future prospects of their respective companies;
compared certain financial and stock market information for Legacy and Berkshire Hills with similar information for certain other companies the securities of which are publicly traded;
reviewed the financial terms of certain recent business combinations in the banking industry; and
performed other studies and analyses that it considered appropriate.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

KBW, in conducting its review and arriving at its opinion, relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information provided to it or otherwise publicly available. KBW did not independently verify the accuracy or completeness of any such information or assume any responsibility for such verification or accuracy. KBW relied upon the management of Legacy and Berkshire Hills as to the reasonableness and achievability of the financial and operating forecasts and projections (and the assumptions and bases therefore) provided to KBW. KBW assumed that such forecasts and projections reflect the best currently available estimates and judgments of such managements and that such forecasts and projections will be realized in the amounts and in the time periods currently estimated by such managements. KBW assumed, without independent verification, that the aggregate allowance for loan and lease losses for Legacy and Berkshire Hills are adequate to cover those losses. KBW did not make or obtain any evaluation or appraisal of the property of Legacy or Berkshire Hills, nor did it examine any individual credit files.

The projections furnished to KBW and used by it in certain of its analyses were prepared by Legacy’s and Berkshire Hills’ senior management teams. Legacy and Berkshire Hills do not publicly disclose internal management projections of the type provided to KBW in connection with its review of the merger. As a result, such projections were not prepared with a view towards public disclosure. The projections were based on numerous variables and assumptions, which are inherently uncertain, including factors related to general economic and competitive conditions. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those set forth in the projections.

For purposes of rendering its opinion, KBW assumed that, in all respects material to its analyses:

the merger will be completed substantially in accordance with the terms set forth in the merger agreement with no additional payments or adjustments to the merger consideration;
the representations and warranties of each party in the merger agreement and in all related documents and instruments referred to in the merger agreement are true and correct;
each party to the merger agreement and all related documents will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by such party under such documents;
all conditions to the completion of the merger will be satisfied without any waiver; and
in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory, contractual, or other consents or approvals for the merger, no restrictions, including any divestiture requirements, termination or other payments or amendments or modifications, will be imposed that will have a material adverse effect on the future results of operations or financial condition of the combined entity or the contemplated benefits of the merger, including the cost savings and related expenses expected to result from the merger.

KBW further assumed that the merger will be accounted for as a purchase transaction under generally accepted accounting principles, and that the merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes. KBW’s opinion is not an expression of an opinion as to the prices at which shares of Legacy common stock or shares of Berkshire Hills common stock will trade following the announcement of the merger or the actual value of the shares of common stock of the combined company when issued pursuant to the merger, or the prices at which the shares of common stock of the combined company will trade following the completion of the merger.

In performing its analyses, KBW made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, which are beyond the control of KBW, Legacy and Berkshire Hills. Any estimates contained in the analyses performed by KBW are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. Additionally, estimates of the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which such businesses or securities might actually be sold. Accordingly, these analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty. In addition, the KBW opinion was among several factors taken into consideration by the Legacy board of directors in making its determination to approve the merger agreement and the merger. Consequently, the analyses described below should not be viewed as determinative of the decision of the Legacy board of directors with respect to the fairness of the consideration.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following is a summary of the material analyses presented by KBW to the Legacy board of directors on December 21, 2010, in connection with its fairness opinion. The summary is not a complete description of the analyses underlying the KBW opinion or the presentation made by KBW to the Legacy board of directors, but summarizes the material analyses performed and presented in connection with such opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytic process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, KBW did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor that it considered, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Accordingly, KBW believes that its analyses and the summary of its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on the information presented below in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses and opinion.

Summary of Proposal.  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Legacy will be converted into the right to receive .056385 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Berkshire Hills and $1.30 in cash. Based on Berkshire Hills’s closing price on Monday, December 20, 2010 of $20.88, the exchange ratio represented a value of $13.07 per share to Legacy.

Selected Peer Group Analysis.  Using publicly available information, KBW compared the financial performance, financial condition and market performance of Legacy and Berkshire Hills to the following depository institutions that KBW considered comparable to Legacy and Berkshire Hills.

Companies included in Legacy’s peer group were:

Arrow Financial CorporationNorthway Financial, Inc.
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.New England Bancshares, Inc.
United Financial Bancorp, Inc.Oneida Financial Corp.
Merchants Bancshares, Inc.Salisbury Bancorp, Inc.
Alliance Financial CorporationHampden Bancorp, Inc.
Enterprise Bancorp, Inc.Chicopee Bancorp, Inc.
Westfield Financial, Inc.Peoples Federal Bancshares, Inc.
Beacon Federal Bancorp, Inc.Central Bancorp, Inc.
New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.
Hingham Institution for Savings

Companies included in Berkshire Hills’s peer group were:

Independent Bank Corp.Merchants Bancshares, Inc.
TrustCo Bank Corp NYAlliance Financial Corporation
Tompkins Financial CorporationEnterprise Bancorp, Inc.
Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.Westfield Financial, Inc.
Brookline Bancorp, Inc.Beacon Federal Bancorp, Inc.
Danvers Bancorp, Inc.New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.
Century Bancorp, Inc.
Arrow Financial Corporation
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
United Financial Bancorp, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

To perform this analysis, KBW used financial information as of the three-month period ended September 30, 2010, except for the comparison of net charge-offs to average loans and last-twelve-months earnings estimates, for which the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2010 was used. Market price information was as of December 20, 2010. 2011 and 2012 earnings estimates were taken from a nationally recognized earnings estimate consolidator for comparable companies. Certain financial data prepared by KBW, and as referenced in the tables presented below, may not correspond to the data presented in Legacy’s and Berkshire Hills’s historical financial statements, or to the data prepared by Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P. presented under the section “Opinion of Berkshire Hills’ Financial Advisor,” as a result of the different periods, assumptions and methods used by KBW to compute the financial data presented.

KBW’s analysis showed the following concerning Legacy’s and Berkshire Hills’s financial performance:

   
 Legacy Legacy
Peer Group
Minimum
 Legacy
Peer Group
Maximum
Core Return on Average Assets(1)  (0.42%)   (1.90%)   1.15
Core Return on Average Equity(1)  (3.3%)   (12.7%)   16.8
Net Interest Margin  3.00  2.60  4.43
Fee Income/Revenue  20.0  4.7  54.9
Efficiency Ratio  89.8  40.8  206.8

   
 Berkshire Hills Berkshire Hills
Peer Group
Minimum
 Berkshire Hills
Peer Group
Maximum
Core Return on Average Assets(1)  0.49  (0.32%)   1.15
Core Return on Average Equity(1)  3.50  (1.70%)   16.80
Net Interest Margin  3.33  2.41  4.43
Fee Income/Revenue  26.00  1.50  38.70
Efficiency Ratio  70.40  46.80  72.90

(1)Core income excludes extraordinary items, non-recurring items and gains/losses on sale of securities

KBW’s analysis showed the following concerning Legacy’s and Berkshire Hills’s financial condition:

   
 Legacy Legacy
Peer Group
Minimum
 Legacy
Peer Group
Maximum
Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets  10.68  4.24  20.95
Total Capital Ratio  11.10  11.39  35.74
Loans/Deposits  94.00  53.80  127.30
Core Deposits/Total Deposits  81.40  71.80  91.60
Loan Loss Reserve/Loans  1.44  0.84  2.38
Nonperforming Assets/Loans + OREO  3.35  0.32  4.41
Last Twelve Months Net Charge-Offs/
Average Loans
  1.57  0.01  2.05

   
 Berkshire Hills Berkshire Hills
Peer Group
Minimum
 Berkshire Hills
Peer Group
Maximum
Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets  7.97%(2)   5.59  19.09
Total Capital Ratio  10.75%(3)   11.39  35.74
Loans/Deposits  99.30  45.90  124.40
Core Deposits/Total Deposits  82.30  75.10  92.50
Loan Loss Reserve/Loans  1.55  0.90  2.38
Nonperforming Assets/Loans + OREO  1.02  0.32  3.84
Last Twelve Months Net Charge-Offs/
Average Loans
  1.89  0.07  2.05

(2)8.2% pro forma for acquisition of Rome Bancorp, Inc.
(3)11.2% pro forma for acquisition of Rome Bancorp, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

KBW’s analysis showed the following concerning Legacy’s and Berkshire Hills’s market performance:

   
 Legacy Legacy
Peer Group
Minimum
 Legacy
Peer Group
Maximum
Stock Price/Book Value per Share  0.63x   0.43x   2.06x 
Stock Price/Tangible Book Value per Share  0.73x   0.58x   2.31x 
Stock Price/Last Twelve Months EPS  NM(4)   6.0x   603.5x 
Dividend Yield  2.3  0.0  6.0
Last Twelve Months Dividend Payout Ratio  NM(4)   0.0  240.0

(4)The numerator is negative, resulting in non-meaningful multiples.

   
 Berkshire Hills Berkshire Hills
Peer Group
Minimum
 Berkshire Hills
Peer Group
Maximum
Stock Price/Book Value per Share  0.77x(5)   0.68x   2.06x 
Stock Price/Tangible Book Value per Share  1.40x(6)   0.68x   2.31x 
Stock Price/2011 EPS(7)  15.00x   9.60x   55.80x 
Stock Price/2012 EPS(7)  12.20x   9.60x   45.70x 
Dividend Yield  3.10  1.00  4.30
2011 Dividend Payout Ratio  46.00  16.70  150.00

(5)0.8x pro forma for acquisition of Rome Bancorp, Inc.
(6)1.5x pro forma for acquisition of Rome Bancorp, Inc.
(7)Estimates per First Call consensus

Comparable Transaction Analysis.  KBW reviewed publicly available information related to selected comparably sized acquisitions of banks and bank holding companies as well as thrifts and thrift holding companies with headquarters in the New England region (CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT)and Mid-Atlantic region (DE, MD, NJ, NY, PA) announced after December 31, 2008, with aggregate transaction values between $25 million and $500 million. The transactions included in the groups were:

AcquirorAcquiree
Norwood Financial Corp.North Penn Bancorp, Inc.
Community Bank System, Inc.Wilber Corporation
Modern Capital Partners L.P.Madison National Bancorp Inc.
Chemung Financial CorporationFort Orange Financial Corp.
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Rome Bancorp, Inc.
F.N.B. CorporationComm Bancorp, Inc.
People's United Financial, Inc.LSB Corporation
People's United Financial, Inc.Smithtown Bancorp, Inc.
Eastern Bank CorporationWainwright Bank & Trust Company
WSFS Financial CorporationChristiana Bank & Trust Company
Kearny Financial Corp. (MHC)Central Jersey Bancorp
Donegal Group Inc.Union National Financial Corporation
Tower Bancorp, Inc.First Chester County Corporation
Bryn Mawr Bank CorporationFirst Keystone Financial, Inc.
Union Savings BankFirst Litchfield Financial Corporation
First Niagara Financial Group, Inc.Harleysville National Corporation
Danvers Bancorp, Inc.Beverly National Corporation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Transaction multiples for the merger were derived from an offer price of$13.07 per share for Legacy. For each precedent transaction, KBW derived and compared, among other things, the implied ratio of price per common share paid for the acquired company to:

book value per share of the acquired company based on the latest publicly available financial statements of the company available prior to the announcement of the acquisition;
tangible book value per share of the acquired company based on the latest publicly available financial statements of the company available prior to the announcement of the acquisition;
tangible equity premium to core deposits (total deposits less time deposits greater than $100,000) based on the latest publicly available financial statements of the company available prior to the announcement of the acquisition; and
market premium based on the latest closing price 1-day prior to the announcement of the acquisition.

The results of the analysis are set forth in the following table:

   
Transaction Price to: Berkshire Hills/
Legacy Merger
 Comparable
Transactions
Minimum
 Comparable
Transactions
Maximum
Book Value  96  49  198
Tangible Book Value  111  51  200
Core Deposit Premium  1.9  (4.0%)   14.1
Market Premium(1)  52.4  3.7  158.6

(1)Based on Legacy closing price of $8.58 on December 20, 2010

No company or transaction used as a comparison in the above analysis is identical to Legacy, Berkshire Hills or the merger. Accordingly, an analysis of these results is not mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies.

Financial Impact Analysis.  KBW performed pro forma merger analyses that combined projected income statement and balance sheet information of Legacy and Berkshire Hills. Assumptions regarding the accounting treatment, acquisition adjustments and cost savings were used to calculate the financial impact that the merger would have on certain projected financial results of Berkshire Hills. In the course of this analysis, KBW used earnings estimates for Berkshire Hills for 2011 and 2012 from a nationally recognized earnings estimate consolidator and used Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 and 2012. This analysis indicated that the merger is expected to be accretive to Berkshire Hills’s estimated earnings per share in 2011 and 2012. The analysis also indicated that the merger is expected to be dilutive to book value per share and to tangible book value per share for Berkshire Hills and that Berkshire Hills would maintain well capitalized capital ratios. For all of the above analyses, the actual results achieved by Berkshire Hills following the merger will vary from the projected results, and the variations may be material.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.  KBW performed a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate a range of the present values of after-tax cash flows that Legacy could provide to equity holders through 2015 on a stand-alone basis. In performing this analysis, KBW used Legacy’s Management Projections for 2011 and 2012 and with respect to 2013 – 2015 applied a long-term annual growth rate of 6.0%, and assumed discount rates ranging from 11.0% to 15.0%. The range of values was determined by adding (1) the present value of projected cash flows to Legacy stockholders from 2010 to 2015 and (2) the present value of the terminal value of Legacy’s common stock. In determining cash flows available to stockholders, KBW assumed that Legacy would maintain a tangible common equity/tangible asset ratio of 7.00% and would retain sufficient earnings to maintain that level. Any earnings in excess of what would need to be retained represented dividendable cash flows for Legacy. In calculating the terminal value of Legacy, KBW applied multiples ranging from 10.0 times to 18.0 times 2016 forecasted earnings. This resulted in a range of values of Legacy from $7.67 to $10.67 per share.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

KBW stated that the discounted cash flow present value analysis is a widely used valuation methodology but noted that it relies on numerous assumptions, including asset and earnings growth rates, terminal values and discount rates. The analysis did not purport to be indicative of the actual values or expected values of Legacy.

Other Analyses.  KBW reviewed the relative financial and market performance of Legacy and Berkshire Hills to a variety of relevant industry peer groups and indices. KBW also reviewed earnings estimates, balance sheet composition, historical stock performance and other financial data for Berkshire Hills.

The Legacy board of directors has retained KBW as an independent contractor to act as financial adviser to Legacy regarding the merger. As part of its investment banking business, KBW is continually engaged in the valuation of banking businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes. As specialists in the securities of banking companies, KBW has experience in, and knowledge of, the valuation of banking enterprises.

KBW’s Compensation and Other Relationships with Legacy.  Legacy and KBW have entered into an agreement relating to the services to be provided by KBW in connection with the merger. Legacy has paid KBW a cash fee of $200,000 concurrently with the rendering of the Fairness Opinion relating to the Transaction. Additionally, Legacy has agreed to pay to KBW at the time of closing of the Transaction a cash fee (“Contingent Fee”) equal to 1.25% of the aggregate consideration offered in exchange for the outstanding shares of common stock or assets of Legacy in the Transaction. The fees paid prior to the Contingent Fee payment will be credited against the Contingent Fee. Pursuant to the KBW engagement agreement, Legacy also agreed to reimburse KBW for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements incurred in connection with its retention and to indemnify against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws.

In the ordinary course of its business as a broker-dealer, KBW may, from time to time, purchase securities from, and sell securities to, Legacy and Berkshire Hills. As a market maker in securities KBW may from time to time have a long or short position in, and buy or sell, debt or equity securities of Legacy and Berkshire Hills for KBW’s own account and for the accounts of its customers.

Recommendation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors and Reasons for Merger

Berkshire Hills’s board of directors reviewed and discussed the transaction with Berkshire Hills’s management and its financial and legal advisors in unanimously determining that the merger was advisable and is fair to, and in the best interests of, Berkshire Hills and its stockholders. In reaching its determination, the Berkshire Hills board of directors considered a number of factors, including, among others, the following:

the board’s understanding of, and the presentations of Berkshire Hills’s management and financial advisor regarding, Legacy’s business, operations, management, financial condition, asset quality, earnings and prospects;
the board’s view that the merger will allow for enhanced opportunities for Berkshire Hills’s new and existing clients and customers;
the results of management’s due diligence investigation of Legacy and the reputation, business practices and experience of Legacy and its management, including their impression that Legacy is a bank holding company that is deeply committed to its customers, employees, and the communities that it serves;
the board’s view of potential synergies resulting from a combination of Berkshire Hills and Legacy;
the board’s view that the combined company will have the potential to realize a stronger competitive position and improved long-term operating and financial results, including revenue and earning enhancements;
the review by Berkshire Hills’s board of directors with its legal and financial advisors of the structure of the Merger and the financial and other terms of the Merger Agreement; and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the financial information and analyses presented by Sandler O’Neill to the Berkshire Hills board of directors, and its opinion to the Berkshire Hills board of directors to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, based upon and subject to the assumptions, qualifications, conditions, limitations and other matters set forth in such opinion, the merger consideration to be paid by Berkshire Hills to Legacy stockholders in the merger is fair to Berkshire Hills from a financial point of view. A copy of the written opinion that was delivered to the Berkshire Hills board is included as Appendix C to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and described under “Opinion of Berkshire Hills’s Financial Advisor” beginning on page 58.STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE OPINION IN ITS ENTIRETY.

This discussion of the factors considered by Berkshire Hills’s board of directors is not exhaustive. Berkshire Hills’s board of directors considered these factors as a whole, and considered them to be favorable to, and supportive of, its determination. Berkshire Hills’s board of directors did not consider it practical, nor did it attempt, to quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in reaching its decision. The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board evaluated the factors described above, including asking questions of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s management and Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s legal and financial advisors, and reached the unanimous decision that the merger was in the best interests of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its stockholders. In considering the factors described above, individual members of the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills’s board of directors may have given different weights to different factors. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors realized there can be no assurance about future results, including results expected or considered in the factors listed above. However, the board concluded the potential positive factors outweighed the potential risks of completing the merger. It should be noted that this explanation of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board’s reasoning and all other information presented in this section is forward-looking in nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the factors discussed under the heading“Caution About Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 12.

The Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills’s board of directors determined that the merger the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated therebymerger are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills and


TABLE OF CONTENTS

its stockholders.Accordingly, the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills’s board of directors unanimouslyadopted and approved the merger agreementMerger Agreement, and unanimously recommends that Berkshire Hills stockholders vote “FOR” approval of the transactions contemplated thereby.Merger Agreement in connection with the Merger.

THE ROME BANCORP, INC.BERKSHIRE HILLS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT ROME BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERSYOU VOTE “FOR” THE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO ADJOURNAPPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES.MERGER AGREEMENT.

Opinion of RomeBerkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s Financial Advisor

On April 8,By letter dated December 17, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills retained Sandler O’Neill to act as its financial advisor.advisor in connection with a corporate transaction for the purchase of Legacy. Sandler O’Neill is a nationally recognized investment banking firm whose principal business specialty is financial institutions. In the ordinary course of its investment banking business, Sandler O’Neill is regularly engaged in the valuation of financial institutions and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions.

Sandler O’Neill acted as financial advisor to Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills in connection with the proposed transactionmerger and participated in certain of the negotiations leading to the execution of the merger agreement. At the October 8,December 20, 2010 meeting at which Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sBerkshire Hills’s board of directors considered and approved the merger agreement, subject to satisfactory resolution of certain outstanding issues, Sandler O’Neill delivered to the board its oral opinion that, as of such date, the merger consideration was fair to the holders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stockBerkshire Hills from a financial point of view.view and thereafter confirmed its opinion in writing by letter dated December 21, 2010.The full text of Sandler O’Neill’s written opinion dated October 12, 2010, is attached as Appendix C to this document as Annex B.Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The opinion outlines the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Sandler O’Neill in rendering its opinion. The description of the opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the opinion. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sBerkshire Hills’s and Legacy’s stockholders are urged to read the entire opinion carefully in connection with their consideration of the proposed merger.

Sandler O’Neill’s opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion. The opinion was directed to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sBerkshire Hills’s board of directors and is directed only to the fairness of the merger consideration paid to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stockholdersLegacy from a financial point of view. It does not address the underlying business decision of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills to engage in the merger or any other aspect of the merger and is not a recommendation to any Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote at the special meeting with respect to the merger or any other matter.

In connection with rendering its October 12,December 21, 2010 opinion, Sandler O’Neill reviewed and considered, among other things:

(i)(1)the merger agreement;
(ii)certain publicly available financial statements and other historical financial information of Rome Bancorp, Inc. that it deemed relevant;
(iii)(2)certain publicly available financial statements and other historical financial information of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. that itSandler O’Neill deemed relevant;
(iv)internal financial projections for Rome Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended 2010 and estimated growth and performance for the years ended December 31, 2011 through 2014, in each case as provided and reviewed with senior management of Rome Bancorp, Inc.;
(v)consensus earnings per share estimates for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. for the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2012 as published by I/B/E/S and reviewed with management of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and long-term estimated growth rate for the years thereafter as discussed with management of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.;
(vi)the pro forma financial impact of the merger on Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., based on assumptions relating to transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments and cost savings determined by the senior management of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.;

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(vii)(3)certain publicly available financial statements and other historical financial information of Legacy that Sandler O’Neill deemed relevant;
(4)publicly available consensus earnings estimates for Berkshire Hills for the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2012 and financial projections for the years thereafter through 2014 determined using estimated growth rates provided by and discussed with senior management of Berkshire Hills;
(5)internal financial projections for Legacy for the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2011 as provided by Legacy and adjusted by senior management of Berkshire Hills, financial projections for the years thereafter through 2014 determined using estimated growth rates provided by and discussed with senior management of Berkshire Hills;
(6)the pro forma financial impact of the Merger on Berkshire Hills, based on assumptions relating to transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments, potentially required deposit divestitures and cost savings determined by the senior management of Berkshire Hills;
(7)the publicly reported historical price and trading activity for Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sBerkshire Hills’s and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s common stock, including a comparison of certain financial and stock market information for Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy and similar publicly available information for certain other companies the securities of which are publicly traded;
(viii)(8)the financial terms of certain recent business combinations in the commercial banking industry, to the extent publicly available;
(ix)(9)the current market environment generally and the banking environment in particular; and
(x)(10)such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria as itSandler O’Neill considered relevant.

Sandler O’Neill also discussed with certain members of senior management of Rome Bancorp, Inc. the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and held similar discussions with certain members of senior management of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. regarding the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc.including certain operating, liquidity, regulatory and other financial matters and held similar discussions with certain members of senior management of Legacy regarding the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Legacy.

In performing its review, Sandler O’Neill has relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information that was available to itSandler O’Neill from public sources, or that was provided to itSandler O’Neill by Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc.that was provided to Sandler O’Neill by Legacy or their respectivefinancial representatives or that was otherwise reviewed by Sandler O’Neill and Sandler O’Neill assumed such accuracy and completeness for purposes of rendering its opinion. Sandler O’Neill has further relied on the assurances of management of Rome Bancorp, Inc. andeach of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy that they arewere not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make any of such information inaccurate or misleading. Sandler O’Neill has not been asked to and has not undertaken an independent verification of any of such information and doesit did not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness thereof. Sandler O’Neill did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the specific assets, the collateral securing assets or the liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy or any of their subsidiaries, or the collectability of any such assets. assets, nor was it furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals.

Sandler O’Neill did not make an independent evaluation of and rendered no opinion with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses of Rome Bancorp, Inc., Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or the combined entity nor did it reviewand Legacy and has not reviewed any individual credit files relating to Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy. Sandler O’Neill assumed, with Berkshire Hills’s consent, that the respective allowances for loan losses for both Berkshire Hills and Legacy are adequate to cover such losses.

With respect to the internal financial projections for Rome Bancorp, Inc. as provided by the senior management of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy and the consensus estimates usedinternal financial projections for Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc. and discussedas reviewed with the managementrespective managements of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and in each caseLegacy and used by Sandler O’Neill in its analyses, Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s andthe respective managements of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s respective managementsand Legacy confirmed to Sandler O’Neill that they reflected the best currently available estimates and judgments of such respective management of the respective future financial performances of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.,and Legacy, respectively, and Sandler


TABLE OF CONTENTS

O’Neill assumed that such performances would be achieved. With respect to the projections of transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments and cost savings determinedprovided by and reviewed with the senior management of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., management confirmed to Sandler O’Neill that they reflected the best currently available estimates and judgments of such management and Sandler O’Neill assumed that such performances would be achieved. Sandler O’Neill expressed no opinion as to such financial projections or the assumptions on which they are based. Sandler O’Neill has also assumed that there has been no material change in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s or Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sand Legacy assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since the date of the most recent financial statements made available to it.Sandler O’Neill. Sandler O’Neill has assumed in all respects material to its analysis that Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy will remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to itsthe analyses, that all of the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement and all related agreements are true and correct, that each party to the agreementsmerger agreement will perform all of the covenants required to be performed by such party under the agreements,merger agreement and that the conditions precedent in the agreementsmerger agreement are not waived and that the merger will be a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. Finally, Rome Bancorp, Inc. has consented towaived. Sandler O’Neill relying on advice received from Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sexpressed no opinion as to any of the legal, accounting and tax advisors as to all legal, accounting andor tax matters relating to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sandler O’Neill’s opinion iswas necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to itSandler O’Neill as of, October 12, 2010.the date of the opinion. Events occurring after October 12, 2010the date of the opinion could materially affect suchthe opinion. Sandler O’Neill has not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw thisthe opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date hereof and expressesof the opinion. Sandler O’Neill expressed no opinion as to what the value of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock will be when issued to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement or the prices at which Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sBerkshire Hills’s and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s common stock may trade at any time.

Sandler O’Neill’s opinion iswas directed to the board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills in connection with its consideration of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of Berkshire Hills or Legacy as to how such stockholder should vote at any meeting of stockholders called to consider and vote upon the merger. Sandler O’Neill’s opinion is directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to the holders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stockBerkshire Hills and does not address the underlying business decision of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills to engage in the merger, the relative merits of the merger as compared to any other alternative business strategies that might exist for Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills or the effect of any other transaction in which Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills might engage. Sandler O’Neill’s opinion was approved by Sandler O’Neill’s fairness opinion committee. Sandler O’Neill has consented to inclusion of its opinion and a summary thereof in this proxy statement/prospectus and in the registration statement on Form S-4 which includes this proxy statement/prospectus. Sandler O’Neill did not express any opinion as to the fairness of the amount or nature of the consideration to be received in the merger by any Berkshire Hills or Legacy officer, director, or employee, or class of such persons, relative to the consideration to be received in the merger by any other stockholders.

Summary of Proposal.  Sandler O’Neill reviewed the financial terms of the proposed transaction. Using 70%the per share cash consideration of $1.30 plus the outstanding Rome Bancorp, Inc. common shares exchanged at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.5658 share0.56385 multiplied by Berkshire Hills’s average closing stock price for the ten days ending December 15, 2010 ($20.75), Sandler O’Neill calculated a transaction value of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and 30% exchanged for $11.25$13.00 per share, in cash, Sandler O’Neill calculatedor an aggregate transaction value of $73.2 million and a per share consideration of $10.75 as of October 7, 2010.$107.9 million. Based upon financial information for Legacy as or for the last twelve monthsquarter ended June 30, 2010, Sandler O’Neill calculated the following transaction ratios:

Transaction Ratios

 
Transaction
Multiples
Transaction Value / Tangible price/Book Valuevalue  11996
Transaction Value / Adjusted price/Tangible Book Valuebook value110
Core Deposit Premium(1)  1361.0
Price / LTM EPS19.2x
Price / 2010 Estimated EPSPremium to market(2)  20.7x
Core Deposit Premium(3)5.8
1-Day Market Premium16.958

(1)At June 30, 2010, Rome had TCE/TA of 18.59%; all equity above TCE/TA of 10.00% is deemed excess and given dollar for dollar valueCore deposits measured as total deposits less jumbo CDs
(2)Based on Rome Bancorp, Inc. management’s earnings projectionsLegacy’s closing price as of December 17, 2010 ($8.25)
(3)Core deposits exclude jumbo deposits (time deposits greater than $100,000)

Data as of October 7, 2010

The aggregate transaction value of approximately $73.2 million is based upon using 70% of the outstanding Rome Bancorp, Inc. common shares exchanged at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.5658 share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and 30% exchanged for $11.25 per share in cash and 6,777,551 Rome Bancorp, Inc. common shares outstanding and 354,000 options outstanding with a with a value of $1.00 per option for Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders as of October 7, 2010.TABLE OF CONTENTS

Comparable GroupCompany Analysis.  Sandler O’Neill used publicly available information to perform a comparison of selected financial and market trading information for Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Hills.

Sandler O’Neill also used publicly available information to compare selected financial and market trading information for RomeLegacy and a group of financial institutions selected by Sandler O’Neill. The Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy peer group consisted of the following selected publicly tradedpublicly-traded commercial banks and savings banksbank headquartered in New England York Massachusetts and Rhode Island with total assets between $250greater than $500 million and $620 million:less than $2.0 billion:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. Comparable Companies

 
Central Bancorp Rhode Island Inc. Mayflower Bancorp,Merchants Bancshares Inc.
Bar Harbor BanksharesNew England Bancshares
Chicopee Bancorp Inc. NewportNew Hampshire Thrift Bancshares
Community Bancorp.Northway Financial Inc.
First Bancorp Inc.
Elmira Savings Bank, FSB OneidaUnited Financial Corp.Bancorp
Hampden Bancorp Inc. Westfield Financial Inc.

The analysis compared publicly available financial information for Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy and the mean and median financial and market trading data for the Rome Bancorp, Inc. peer group as of and for the period ended June 30, 2010. The table below sets forth the data for Rome Bancorp, Inc. and the median data for the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy peer group as of and for the last twelve months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010. The table below sets forth the data for Legacy and the median data for the Legacy peer group as of and for the last twelve months ended September 30, 2010, with pricing data as of October 7, 2010 for the peer group.December 17, 2010.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. Comparable Group Analysis

  
 Rome Comparable Group
Median Result
Total Assets(in millions) $330  $527 
Return on Average Assets (LTM)  1.08  0.45
Return on Average Equity (LTM)  5.98  5.54
Net Interest Margin (LTM)  4.42  3.41
Efficiency Ratio (LTM)  66.6  80.2
Tangible Equity / Tangible Assets  18.6  8.9
Tier 1 Ratio  23.1  14.8
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio  24.1  15.7
Loan Loss Reserve / Gross Loans  0.89  1.00
Loan Loss Reserve / Non-performing Loans  104.6  110.9
Non-performing Assets / Assets  0.69  0.94
Price / Tangible Book Value  101.7  86.6
Price / Last Twelve Months Earnings per Share  16.4x   15.0x 
Dividend Yield  3.91  1.43
  
Comparable Group Analysis
   Legacy
Bancshares, Inc.
 Comparable Group
Median Result
Total Assets (in millions) $972  $1,053 
Gross Loans/Deposits  94.00  95.10
Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets  10.68  7.62
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio  11.54  15.70
Non-performing Loans/Gross Loans  3.04  1.24
Loan Loss Reserve/Gross Loans  47.10  79.80
Net Charge-Offs/Avg. Loans  1.38  0.20
Return on Average Assets  (0.76)%   0.57
Return on Average Equity  (5.90)%   7.00
Net Interest Margin  3.05  3.43
Efficiency Ratio  87.80  68.00
Price/Tangible Book Value  70.00  110.00
Price/Est. 2011 EPS  NM   13.70x 
Dividend Yield  2.50  294.00
Market Capitalization (in millions) $71  $92 

Sandler O’Neill also used publicly available information to compare selected financial and market trading information for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and a group of financial institutions selected by Sandler O’Neill.senior management. The Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. peer group consisted of the following selected Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont and Maine publicpublicly-traded commercial banks and thriftssavings banks headquartered in New England with total assets between $1greater than $1.0 billion and $5 billion.less than $5.0 billion:

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Comparable Group Analysis

 
Bancorp Rhode Island Inc. Enterprise Bancorp, Inc.Independent Bank Corp.
Bar Harbor BanksharesFirst Bancorp, Inc.
Brookline Bancorp, Inc.Independent Bank Corp.
Cambridge Bancorp Merchants Bancshares Inc.
Camden National CorporationCorp.New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares
Danvers Bancorp Inc. United Financial Bancorp Inc.
CenturyFirst Bancorp Inc. Washington Trust Bancorp Inc.
Danvers Bancorp, Inc.Westfield Financial, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The analysis compared publicly available financial information for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and the mean and median financial and market trading data for the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. peer group as of and for the periodlast twelve months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010. The table below sets forth the data for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and the median data for the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s peer group as of and for the last twelve months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, with pricing data as of October 7, 2010 for the peer group.December 17, 2010.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Comparable Group Analysis

  
 Berkshire Hills
Bancorp, Inc.
 Comparable Group
Median Result
Total Assets(in millions) $2,748  $1,614 
Return on Average Assets  (0.58%)   0.74
Return on Average Equity  (3.89%)   7.87
Net Interest Margin  3.12  3.55
Efficiency Ratio  74.7  65.9
Tangible Equity / Tangible Assets  8.2  8.2
Tier 1 Ratio  9.5  14.1
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio  10.7  15.4
Loan Loss Reserve / Gross Loans  1.57  1.44
Loan Loss Reserve / Non-performing Loans  167.2  104.3
Non-performing Assets / Assets  0.80  0.81
Price / Tangible Book Value  124.5  126.7
Price / Last Twelve Months Earnings per Share  NM   11.8x 
Price / 2010 Estimated Earnings per Share  18.8x   12.7x 
Dividend Yield  3.44  3.37
  
Comparable Group Analysis
   Berkshire Hills Comparable Group
Median Result
Total Assets(in millions) $2,798  $1,559 
Gross Loans/Deposits  99.30  95.70
Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets  7.97  7.20
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio  10.75  15.02
Non-performing Loans/Gross Loans  0.88  1.24
Loan Loss Reserve/Gross Loans  176.10  101.20
Net Charge-Offs/Avg. Loans  0.40  0.24
Return on Average Assets  (0.52)%   0.81
Return on Average Equity  (3.60)%   8.40
Net Interest Margin  3.21  3.56
Efficiency Ratio  74.10  65.70
Price/Tangible Book Value  139.00  141.00
Price/Est. 2011 EPS  18.50x   13.60x 
Dividend Yield  3.00  3.19
Market Capitalization(in millions) $291  $209 

Stock Trading History.  Sandler O’Neill reviewed the history of the publicly reported trading prices of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock for the three-yearone-year period ended October 7,December 17, 2010. Sandler O’Neill also reviewed the history of the reported trading prices Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock for the three-year period ended October 7, 2010. Sandler O’Neill then compared the relationship between the movements in the price of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock againstand the movements in the prices of the NASDAQ BankS&P 500 Index and a market-capitalization weighted index of Legacy’s comparable company peer group.

  
Legacy One-Year Common Stock Performance
   Beginning
Index Value
December 17,
2009
 Ending
Index Value
December 17,
2010
Legacy.  100  86
S&P 500 Index  100   113 
Legacy Peer Group  100   112 

Sandler O’Neill reviewed the Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s peers, listed inhistory of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. Comparable Companies above.

Duringpublicly reported trading prices of Berkshire Hills common stock for the three-year period ended October 7, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s13, 2010. Sandler O’Neill also reviewed the relationship between the movements in the price of Berkshire Hills common stock outperformed Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and the NASDAQ Bank Index.movements in the prices of the S&P 500 Index and a market-capitalization weighted index of Berkshire Hill’s comparable company peer group.

Rome’s Three-Year Stock Performance

  
 Beginning
Index Value
October 7, 2007
 Ending
Index Value
October 7, 2010
Rome Bancorp, Inc.  100.0  78.2
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.  100.0   60.3 
NASDAQ Bank Index  100.0   53.4 
Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s Comparable Companies  100.0   79.2 

During the three-year period ended October 7, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock outperformed the NASDAQ Bank Index.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s Three-Year Stock Performance

  
 Beginning
Index Value
October 7, 2007
 Ending
Index Value
October 7, 2010
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.  100.0  60.3
Rome Bancorp, Inc.  100.0   78.2 
NASDAQ Bank Index  100.0   53.4 
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s
          
Comparable Companies  100.0   85.4 
  
Berkshire Hills One-Year Common Stock Performance
   Beginning
Index Value
December 17,
2009
 Ending
Index Value
December 17,
2010
Berkshire Hills.  100  106
S&P 500 Index  100   113 
Berkshire Hills Peer Group  100   125 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. Net Present Value Analysis.  Sandler O’Neill performed an analysis that estimated the present value per common share of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock through December 31, 2014, assuming that Rome Bancorp, Inc. performed in accordance with2014. Sandler O’Neill based the analysis on Legacy projected earnings stream as derived from the internal financial projections for 2010 provided by Legacy management for years ending December 31, 2010 through 2011, and adjusted by management of Berkshire Hills to reflect adjustments that would occur after the merger is completed. Sandler O’Neill included in the adjustments to Legacy’s earnings the impact of expected transaction related cost savings of approximately 45% of Legacy’s core non-interest expense base, the impact of a $200 million deposit divestiture receiving a 3.50% premium on deposits, and the impact of a one-time special dividend of $2.50 associated with excess capital related to the financial projections for 2011 through 2014 as discussed with management.deposit divestiture. To approximate the terminal value of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy common stock at December 31, 2014, Sandler O’Neill applied price to forward earnings multiples of 10.0x to 20.0x and multiples of tangible book value ranging from 80%100% to 130%175%. The dividend income streams and terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount rates ranging from 12.0%7.2% to 16.0% chosen13.0%, which were selected to reflect different assumptions regarding requireddesired rates of return of holders of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock. In addition, the terminal value of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock at December 31, 2014 was calculated using the same range of earnings multiples (10.0x – 20.0x) applied to a range of discounts and premiums to management’s budget projections. The range applied to the budgeted net income was 25% under budget to 25% over budget, using a discount rate of 14.82% for the tabular analysis. As illustrated in the following tables, this analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share for Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock of $4.51 to $9.10 when applying the price/earnings multiples to the matched budget, $3.83 to $9.94 when applying the price/earnings multiples to the -25% / +25% budget range and $5.45 to $9.40 when applying multiples of tangible book value to the matched budget.

Earnings Per Share Multiples / Variable Discount Rates


(Value shown is $ per share)

            
Discount Rate
 10.0x 12.0x 14.0x 16.0x 18.0x 20.0x 10.0x 12.0x 14.0x 16.0x 18.0x 20.0x
7.2%
  10.32   11.73   13.14   14.56   15.97   17.39 
8.0%
  10.08   11.45   12.83   14.20   15.57   16.95 
9.0%
  9.79   11.12   12.44   13.77   15.09   16.41 
10.0%
  9.52   10.80   12.07   13.35   14.62   15.90 
11.0%
  9.26   10.49   11.72   12.95   14.18   15.41 
12.0%
  5.19   5.97   6.75   7.54   8.32   9.10   9.00   10.19   11.38   12.57   13.75   14.94 
13.0%
  5.01   5.76   6.51   7.26   8.01   8.77   8.76   9.91   11.05   12.20   13.35   14.49 
14.0%
  4.84   5.56   6.28   7.00   7.73   8.45 
15.0%
  4.67   5.37   6.06   6.75   7.45   8.14 
16.0%
  4.51   5.18   5.85   6.52   7.19   7.85 

Earnings Per Share Multiples / Variable Budget

      
Budget Variance
 10.0x 12.0x 14.0x 16.0x 18.0x 20.0x
(25.0%)
  3.83   4.35   4.88   5.40   5.92   6.45 
(20.0%)
  4.00   4.56   5.12   5.68   6.24   6.80 
(15.0%)
  4.18   4.77   5.37   5.96   6.55   7.15 
(10.0%)
  4.35   4.98   5.61   6.24   6.87   7.50 
 (5.0%)
  4.53   5.19   5.85   6.52   7.18   7.85 
 0.0%
  4.70   5.40   6.10   6.80   7.50   8.20 
 5.0%
  4.88   5.61   6.34   7.08   7.81   8.55 
10.0%
  5.05   5.82   6.59   7.36   8.13   8.90 
15.0%
  5.23   6.03   6.83   7.64   8.44   9.25 
20.0%
  5.40   6.24   7.08   7.92   8.76   9.59 
25.0%
  5.58   6.45   7.32   8.20   9.07   9.94 

Tangible Book Value Per Share Multiples / Variable Discount Rates


(Value shown is $ per share)

            
Discount Rate 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 100% 115% 130% 145% 160% 175%
7.2%
  13.01   14.47   15.93   17.40   18.86   20.32 
8.0%
  12.69   14.11   15.53   16.96   18.38   19.80 
9.0%
  12.31   13.68   15.05   16.42   17.79   19.16 
10.0%
  11.95   13.27   14.59   15.91   17.23   18.55 
11.0%
  11.60   12.87   14.14   15.42   16.69   17.97 
12.0%
  6.28   6.91   7.53   8.15   8.78   9.40   11.26   12.49   13.72   14.95   16.18   17.41 
13.0%
  6.06   6.66   7.26   7.86   8.45   9.05   10.94   12.13   13.31   14.50   15.69   16.87 
14.0%
  5.85   6.42   7.00   7.57   8.15   8.72 
15.0%
  5.64   6.20   6.75   7.30   7.86   8.41 
16.0%
  5.45   5.98   6.51   7.04   7.58   8.11 

In connection with its analyses, TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sandler O’Neill also considered and discussed with Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sthe Berkshire Hills board of directors how the present value analysesthis analysis would be affected by changes in the underlying assumptions, including variations with respect to net income. To illustrate this impact, Sandler O’Neill noted thatperformed a similar analysis assuming Legacy net income varied from 12.5% above projections to 12.5% below projections. This analysis resulted in the discounted dividend stream and terminal value analysisfollowing reference ranges of indicated per share values for Legacy common stock, using a discount rate of 10.00%:

Earnings Per Share Multiples
(Value shown is a widely used valuation methodology, but the results of such methodology are highly dependent upon the numerous assumptions that must be made, and the results thereof are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results.$ per share)

      
EPS Projection
Change from
Base Case
 10.0x 12.0x 14.0x 16.0x 18.0x 20.0x
(12.5%)
  8.72   9.84   10.95   12.07   13.19   14.31 
(10.0%)
  8.88   10.03   11.18   12.33   13.48   14.62 
(7.5%)
  9.04   10.22   11.40   12.58   13.76   14.94 
(5.0%)
  9.20   10.41   11.63   12.84   14.05   15.26 
(2.5%)
  9.36   10.60   11.85   13.09   14.34   15.58 
0.0%
  9.52   10.80   12.07   13.35   14.62   15.90 
2.5%
  9.68   10.99   12.30   13.60   14.91   16.22 
5.0%
  9.84   11.18   12.52   13.86   15.20   16.54 
7.5%
  10.00   11.37   12.74   14.11   15.49   16.86 
10.0%
  10.16   11.56   12.97   14.37   15.77   17.18 
12.5%
  10.32   11.75   13.19   14.62   16.06   17.50 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Net Present Value Analysis.  Sandler O’Neill also performed an analysis that estimated the present value per common share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.common stock through December 31, 2014, assuming that2014. Sandler O’Neill based the analysis of consensus Wall Street earnings estimates for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. performed in accordance withfor the financial projections foryears ending December 31, 2010 through 2012 and a projected long-terman estimated growth and performance rate for the years thereafter in each case as provided by, and reviewed with, senior management of 10.0% thereafter.Berkshire Hills. To approximate the terminal value of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock at December 31, 2014, Sandler O’Neill applied price to forward earnings multiples of 11.0x10.0x to 16.0x20.0x and multiples of tangible book value ranging from 110.0%100% to 160.0%175%. The dividend income streams and terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount rates ranging from 9.0%11.0% to 13.0% chosen14.0%, which were selected to reflect different assumptions regarding requireddesired rates of return of holders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. In addition, the terminal value of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock at December 31, 2014 was calculated using the same range of price to earnings multiples of 11.0x to 16.0x applied to a range of discounts and premiums to management’s budget projections. The range applied to the budgeted net income was 25% under budget to 25% over budget, using a discount rate of 10.57% for the tabular analysis. As illustrated in the following tables, this analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock of $14.15 to $22.91 when applying the price/earnings multiples to the matched budget, $12.18 to $26.38 when applying the price/earnings multiples to the -25% / +25% budget range and $14.78 to $24.00 when applying price/tangible book value 110.0% to 160.0% budget range to the matched budget.

Earnings Per Share Multiples / Variable Discount Rates


(Value shown is $ per share)

•   Discount Rate
11.0x12.0x13.0x14.0x15.0x16.0x
 9.0%
16.4717.7619.0520.3421.6222.91
10.0%
15.8517.0818.3219.5620.7922.03
11.0%
15.2516.4417.6318.8120.0021.19
12.0%
14.6915.8316.9718.1119.2520.39
13.0%
14.1515.2416.3417.4318.5319.63
      
Discount Rate 10.0x 12.0x 14.0x 16.0x 18.0x 20.0x
11.0%
  17.92   21.09   24.25   27.41   30.57   33.73 
11.5%
  17.62   20.73   23.83   26.94   30.04   33.15 
12.0%
  17.32   20.38   23.43   26.48   29.53   32.58 
12.7%
  16.89   19.87   22.84   25.81   28.78   31.75 
13.0%
  16.75   19.70   22.64   25.58   28.53   31.47 
13.5%
  16.47   19.37   22.26   25.15   28.04   30.94 
14.0%
  16.20   19.05   21.89   24.73   27.57   30.41 

Earnings Per Share Multiples / Variable Budgets

      
•   Budget Variance
 11.0x 12.0x 13.0x 14.0x 15.0x 16.0x
(25.0%)
  12.18   13.08   13.99   14.90   15.80   16.71 
(20.0%)
  12.84   13.81   14.78   15.74   16.71   17.68 
(15.0%)
  13.51   14.53   15.56   16.59   17.62   18.64 
(10.0%)
  14.17   15.26   16.35   17.43   18.52   19.61 
 (5.0%)
  14.84   15.98   17.13   18.28   19.43   20.58 
 0.0%
  15.50   16.71   17.92   19.13   20.33   21.54 
 5.0%
  16.17   17.43   18.70   19.97   21.24   22.51 
10.0%
  16.83   18.16   19.49   20.82   22.15   23.48 
15.0%
  17.49   18.88   20.27   21.66   23.05   24.44 
20.0%
  18.16   19.61   21.06   22.51   23.96   25.41 
25.0%
  18.82   20.33   21.84   23.35   24.87   26.38 

Tangible Book Value Per Share Multiples / Variable Discount Rates

      
•   Discount Rate
 110% 120% 130% 140% 150% 160%
 9.0%
  17.22   18.58   19.93   21.29   22.65   24.00 
10.0%
  16.56   17.87   19.17   20.47   21.77   23.08 
11.0%
  15.94   17.19   18.44   19.69   20.94   22.19 
12.0%
  15.35   16.55   17.75   18.95   20.15   21.35 
13.0%
  14.78   15.94   17.09   18.24   19.40   20.55 

Analysis of Selected Merger Transactions.  Sandler O’Neill reviewed 19 merger transactions announced from June 1, 2009 through October 1, 2010 involving banks and thrifts in the New England and Mid Atlantic regions with announced transaction values greater than $15 million. Sandler O’Neill reviewed the following multiples: transaction price at announcement to last twelve months’ earnings per share, transaction price to 2010 estimated earnings per share, transaction price to tangible book value, transaction price to adjusted tangible book value, transaction price to core deposits, and transaction price to seller price one day before


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tangible Book Value Per Share Multiples
(Value shown is $ per share)

      
Discount Rate 100% 115% 130% 145% 160% 178%
11.0%
  15.42   17.42   19.41   21.41   23.40   25.40 
11.5%
  15.16   17.12   19.08   21.04   23.00   24.96 
12.0%
  14.91   16.84   18.76   20.69   22.61   24.54 
12.7%
  14.55   16.42   18.30   20.17   22.04   23.92 
13.0%
  14.42   16.28   18.14   20.00   21.86   23.71 
13.5%
  14.19   16.01   17.84   19.66   21.49   23.31 
14.0%
  13.96   15.75   17.54   19.34   21.13   22.92 

Sandler O’Neill also considered and discussed with the Berkshire Hills board of directors how this analysis would be affected by changes in the underlying assumptions, including variations with respect to net income. To illustrate this impact, Sandler O’Neill performed a similar analysis assuming Berkshire Hills net income varied from 12.5% above projections to 12.5% below projections. This analysis resulted in the following reference ranges of indicated per share values for Berkshire Hills common stock, using a discount rate of 12.7%:

Earnings Per Share Multiples
(Value shown is $ per share)

      
EPS Projection
Change from
Base Case
 10.0x 12.0x 14.0x 16.0x 18.0x 20.0x
(12.5%)
  15.04   17.64   20.24   22.84   25.44   28.04 
(10.0%)
  15.41   18.08   20.76   23.43   26.10   28.78 
(7.5%)
  15.78   18.53   21.28   24.02   26.77   29.52 
(5.0%)
  16.15   18.97   21.80   24.62   27.44   30.26 
(2.5%)
  16.52   19.42   22.32   25.21   28.11   31.01 
0.0%
  16.89   19.87   22.84   25.81   28.78   31.75 
2.5%
  17.27   20.31   23.36   26.40   29.45   32.49 
5.0%
  17.64   20.76   23.88   27.00   30.11   33.23 
7.5%
  18.01   21.20   24.40   27.59   30.78   33.98 
10.0%
  18.38   21.65   24.92   28.18   31.45   34.72 
12.5%
  18.75   22.09   25.44   28.78   32.12   35.46 

Analysis of Selected Merger Transactions.  Sandler O’Neill reviewed the terms of merger transactions announced from January 1, 2010 through December 17, 2010 involving United States-based public banks with announced transaction values of greater than $15 million and less than $200 million. Sandler O’Neill deemed these transactions to be reflective of the proposed Legacy and Berkshire Hills combination. Sandler O’Neill reviewed the following ratios and multiples: transaction price to stated book value, transaction price to stated tangible book value, core deposit premium and market price premium at announcement. As illustrated in the following table, Sandler O’Neill compared the proposed merger multiples to the median multiples of the comparable transactions.

•    Comparable Transaction Multiples

  
 BHLB /
ROME
 Median Group
Multiple
Transaction Price / Last Twelve Months Earnings Per Share  19.2x   22.7x 
Transaction Price / 2010 Estimated Earnings Per Share(1)  20.7x   21.6x 
Transaction Price / Tangible Book Value  119  120
Transaction Price / Adjusted Tangible Book Value(2)  136  NM 
Tangible Book Premium/Core Deposits(3)  5.8  3.0
Transaction Price /Seller Price One Day Before Announcement  16.9  51.8
  
Comparable Transaction Multiples
   Legacy Bancshares/
Berkshire Hills
 Comparable
Transactions
Transaction price/Book value  96  126
Transaction price/Tangible book value  110  127
Core Deposit Premium  1.0  4.7
Premium to market  58.0  65.0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1)Based on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s management’s earnings projections
(2)At June 30, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. had TCE/TA of 18.59%; all equity above TCE/TA of 10.00% is deemed excess and given dollar for dollar value
(3)Core deposits exclude jumbo deposits (time deposits greater than $100,000)

Pro Forma Merger Analysis.Analysis.  Sandler O’Neill analyzed certain potential pro forma effects of the merger, assuming the following: (i)(1) the merger closes on March 31,is completed at the end of the second quarter of 2011; (ii) the deal value(2) Legacy shares are exchanged for a combination of cash consideration of $1.30 per share is equal to $10.75 per Rome Bancorp, Inc. share given 70%and 0.56385 of the outstanding Rome Bancorp, Inc. common shares will be exchanged at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.5658 share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and 30% exchangedcommon stock.; (3) management prepared earnings projections for $11.25 in cash; (iii) 36.5% cost savings of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s projected operating expense which is 75% phased in during 2011 and fully phased in by 2012; (iv) approximately $7.0 mm in pre-tax transaction costs and expenses; expensed at close (v) a core deposit intangible of 2.5% based on all CD deposits less than $100,000 (8 year, sum-of-year digit amortization method) (vi) a 2.00% opportunity cost of cash; (vii) Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s performance was calculated in accordance with management’s budget and guidance; and (viii) Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s performance was calculated in accordance street estimates from the year ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012, and a long-term growth rate of 10.0% was applied thereafter. The analyses indicated thatLegacy for the year ending December 31, 2010 through 2011 and adjusted by senior management of Berkshire Hills, through 2012; (4) certain purchase accounting adjustments, including both a credit and interest rate mark against Legacy’s loan portfolio, and additional marks on securities, other assets, borrowings and time deposits; (5) cost savings of 45% of Legacy’s annual operating expenses, with 100% realized in the first full year; (6) a deposit divestiture of $200 million for a 3.50% premium; and (7) certain other assumptions pertaining to costs and expenses associated with the transaction, intangible amortization, opportunity cost of cash and other items.

For the six months ending December 31, 2011 and the full year ending December 31, 2012, Sandler O’Neill compared the projected earnings per share of Berkshire Hills common stock to the EPS, on a GAAP basis, of the combined company common stock using the foregoing assumptions.

The following table sets forth the results of the analysis:

 
 GAAP Basis
Accretion/
(Dilution)(1)
2011 Estimated EPS $0.08 
2012 Estimated EPS $0.10 

(1)Excluding one-time transaction expenses

The analyses indicated that the merger would be accretive to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ projected 2011 and 2012 earnings per share, excluding one-time transaction costs, and at March 31, 2011 the merger would be dilutive to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s tangible book value per share.expenses. The actual results achieved by the combined company may vary from projected results and the variations may be material.

Miscellaneous.Sandler O’Neill’s Compensation and Other Relationships with Berkshire Hills  Sandler O’Neill has acted as Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s financial advisor to the board of directors of Berkshire Hills in connection with the merger and will receivemerger. Berkshire Hills agreed to pay Sandler O’Neill a transaction fee for its services equal to one percentof $810,000, $162,000 of which was payable upon the signing of the aggregate purchase priceMerger Agreement and the remainder of the merger, as well asfee contingent upon the completion of the merger. Sandler O’Neill also received a fee of $200,000$150,000 for rendering its fairness opinion which fee shall be credited againstto the one percent fee referenced above if the merger is completed. Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Hills board of directors. Berkshire Hills has also agreed to reimburse Sandler O’Neill for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and to indemnify Sandler O’Neill against certain liabilities arising out of its engagement. Sandler O’Neill’s fairness opinion was approved by Sandler O’Neill’s fairness opinion committee.

During the two years preceding the date of its opinion to Berkshire Hills, Sandler O’Neill had a variety of investment banking relationships with Berkshire Hills, for which it received customary compensation. Such services during this period included acting as financial advisor for Berkshire Hills with respect to certain strategic matters in 2009, for which it was paid approximately $75,000 and as lead underwriter with respect to Berkshire Hills’ two offerings of its equity securities in October 2008 and May 2009, for which Sandler O’Neill was paid approximately $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively. In addition, Sandler O’Neill provided a valuation for certain Berkshire Hills equity, for which it has received approximately $25,000.

In the ordinary course of our business as a broker-dealer,their respective broker and dealer businesses, Sandler O’Neill may purchase securities from and sell securities to Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and their respective affiliates. Sandler O’Neill may also actively trade the debt and/or equity securities of Legacy and Berkshire Hills or their affiliates for their own accounts and for the accounts of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

Consideration to be Received in the Merger

When the mergerMerger becomes effective, each share of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock issued and outstanding immediately before the completion of the mergerMerger will automatically be converted into the right to receive, at the holder’s election, either (a) $11.25$1.30 in cash without interest orand (b) 0.56580.56385 shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and cash instead of fractional shares, subject to the allocation restrictions discussed below.

Although stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. are being given the choice of whether to receive cash or Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in exchange for their shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock, all cash and stock elections will be subject to the allocation and proration procedures as well as other provisions in the merger agreement such that the aggregate merger consideration to be paid by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will be in the form of 70% Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and 30% in cash.shares.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a requirement contained in any regulatory approval, and if the weighted average deposit premium that Berkshire Hills receives for those divested deposits exceeds 350 basis points, then Berkshire Hills will be required under the Merger Agreement to make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders that, in the aggregate, will equal 50% of the premium in excess of 350 basis points (net of applicable taxes on such excess premium). The Merger Agreement specifically provides as follows:

In the event the parties must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with a requirement contained in any regulatory approval or to obtain any regulatory approval (such deposit divestures being referred to asRequired Divestures”), Berkshire Hills will make an additional cash payment to Legacy stockholders (net of applicable taxes) of 50% of any weighted average deposit premium which exceeds 350 basis points for such divested deposits. The cash payment to Legacy shareholders as a result of a Required Divesture will be made in the manner and pursuant to the timing and conditions set forth below to stockholders of Legacy as of the completion of the Merger, and will be equal to the product of:

(i) (1) the weighted average deposit premium paid for such divested deposits which exceeds 350 basis points (the “Excess Amount”), calculating such Excess Amount without regard to any tax imposed upon Berkshire Hills under U.S. federal, state, or local tax law as a result of such divestiture (the “Divestiture Tax”), less (2) that portion of the Divestiture Tax allocable to the Excess Amount, and

(ii) 0.50 (the “Aggregate Divestiture Premium”).

Berkshire Hills must pay the Aggregate Divestiture Premium within 5 business days after the completion of all Required Divestitures. Each Legacy stockholder as of the closing of the Merger shall have the right to receive a cash payment equal to their pro rata portion of the Aggregate Divestiture Premium based upon the number of shares of Legacy Common Stock held by such Legacy stockholder at that time in relation to all other shares of outstanding Legacy Common Stock at that time. It is anticipated that such cash payment, if any, would occur subsequent to the completion of the Merger. See “— Material Tax Consequences of the Merger ” for a discussion of the tax consequences of any such cash payment.

If Berkshire Hills declares a stock dividend or distribution on shares of its common stock or subdivides, splits, reclassifies or combines the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock prior to the effective time of the merger,Merger, then the exchange ratio will be adjusted to provide Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders with the same economic effect as contemplated by the merger agreementMerger Agreement prior to any of these events.

Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders will not receive fractional shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Instead, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders will receive a cash payment for any fractional shares in an amount equal to the product of (i) the fraction of a share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to which such stockholder is entitled multiplied by (ii) the average closing price of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock during the five consecutive trading days ending on the day that is five business days before the closing date of the merger.Merger.

Treatment of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. Stock Options

At the effective time of the merger,Merger, (i) each option to purchase shares Rome Bancorp, Inc.of Legacy common stock granted under Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stock option plans that is outstanding and unexercised immediately before the closing of the mergerLegacy 2006 Equity Incentive Plan will cease to represent a rightan option to acquire shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.purchase Legacy common stock and will be terminated andconverted automatically into an option to purchase Berkshire Hills common stock equal to the holderproduct (rounded down to the nearest whole share) of the stock option shall receive an amount of cash determined by multiplying (i) the greater of (A) the excess, if any, of $11.25 over the stock option exercise price per share or (B) $1.00 by (ii) the number of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock thatsubject to such Legacy stock option, and (B) 0.6265, at an exercise price per share (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal to (1) the exercise price of such Legacy stock option divided by (2) 0.6265, (ii) notwithstanding the foregoing, all stock options granted on November 29, 2006 with an exercise price of $16.03 will be cancelled and the holder could have purchased assuming full vesting of that option. No outstanding Rome Bancorp, Inc.thereof will receive $3.00 for each cancelled stock option, and (iii) notwithstanding the foregoing, all stock options mayheld by J. Williar Dunlaevy shall be exercised during the pendency of the merger.

Cash or Stock Election

Under the terms of the merger agreement, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders may electconverted automatically into stock options to convert their shares into cash,purchase Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock or a mixture of cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. All elections of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders are further subject to the allocation and proration procedures described in the merger agreement. These procedures provide that the number of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be converted into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in the merger must be 70% of the total number of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock issued and outstanding on the date of the merger and that the total value of the stock portion of the merger consideration must be equal to at least 30% of the merger consideration. Neither Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. nor Rome Bancorp, Inc. is making any recommendation as to whether Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders should elect to receive cash or Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in the merger. Holders of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock must make their own decisions with respect to such election.

It is unlikely that elections will be made in the exact proportions provided for in the merger agreement. As a result, the merger agreement describes procedures to be followed if Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders in the aggregate elect to receive more or less of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has agreed to issue. These procedures are summarized below.

If Stock Is Oversubscribed:  If Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders elect to receive more Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has agreed to issue in the merger, then all Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who have elected to receive cash or who have made no election will receive cash for their Rome Bancorp, Inc. shares and all stockholders who elected to receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock will receive a pro rata portion of the available Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. shares plus cash for those shares not converted into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock.
If Stock Is Undersubscribed:  If Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders elect to receive fewer shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has agreed to issue in the merger, then all Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who have elected to receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock will receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and those stockholders who elected to receive cash or who have made no election will be treated in the following manner:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If the number of shares held by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who have made no election is sufficient to make up the shortfall in the number of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. shares that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. is required to issue, then all Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who elected cash will receive cash, and those stockholders who made no election will receive both cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in whatever proportion is necessary to make up the shortfall.
If the number of shares held by Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who have made no election is insufficient to make up the shortfall, then all Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who made no election will receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and those Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who elected to receive cash will receive cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in whatever proportion is necessary to make up the shortfall.

Notwithstanding these rules, as described under “— Material Tax Consequences of the Merger,” it may be necessary for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. to reduce the number of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock that will be converted into the right to receive cash and correspondingly increase the number of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock that will be converted into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. If this adjustment is necessary, stockholders who elect to receive cash or a mixture of cash and stock may be required on a pro rata basis to receive a greater amount of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock than they otherwise would have received.

No guarantee can be made that Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders will receive the amounts of cash and/or stock they elect. As a result of the allocation procedures and other limitations outlined in this documentparagraph and in the merger agreement, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders may receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock orsuch options shall not be entitled to any cash in amounts that vary from the amounts they elect to receive.payment.

Election Procedures; Surrender of Stock Certificates

An election form is being provided under separate cover to holders of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Each election form entitles the holder of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock to elect to receive cash, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, or a combination of cash and stock, or make no election with respect to the merger consideration he or she wishes to receive.

To make an effective election, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders must submit a properly completed election form, along with their Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates representing all shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock covered by the election form (or an appropriate guarantee of delivery), to Registrar and Transfer Company on or before 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on. Registrar and Transfer Company will act as exchange agent in the merger and in that role will process the exchange of Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates for cash and/or Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The exchange agent will allocate cash and stock among Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders, consistent with their elections and the allocation and proration procedures. If Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders do not submit an election form, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders will receive instructions from the exchangetransfer agent on where to surrender their Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stock certificates after the mergerMerger is completed. In any event, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders should not forward their Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stock certificates with their proxy cards.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders may change their election at any time before the election deadline by written notice accompanied by a properly completed and signed later dated election form received by the exchange agent before the election deadline or by withdrawal of their stock certificates by written notice before the election deadline. All elections will be revoked automatically if the merger agreement is terminated. If Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders have a preference for receiving either Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stock and/or cash for their Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock, they should complete and return the election form. If Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders do not make an election, they will be allocated Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and/or cash depending on the elections made by other stockholders.

Neither Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. nor Rome Bancorp, Inc. makes any recommendation as to whether Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders should elect to receive cash, stock or a combination of cash and stock in the merger. Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders must make their own decision with respect to their election.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Generally, the merger will be a tax-free transaction for Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders to the extent they receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. See“— Material Tax Consequences of the Merger.”

If certificates for Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock are not immediately available or Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders are unable to send the election form and other required documents to the exchange agent before the election deadline, Rome Bancorp, Inc. shares may be properly exchanged, and an election will be effective, if:

such exchanges are made by or through a member firm of a registered national securities exchange or of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or by a commercial bank or trust company having an office, branch or agency in the United States;
the exchange agent receives, before the election deadline, a properly completed and duly executed notice of guaranteed delivery substantially in the form provided with the election form (delivered by hand, mail, telegram, telex or facsimile transmission); and
the exchange agent receives, within three business days after the election deadline, the certificates for all exchanged Rome Bancorp, Inc. shares, or confirmation of the delivery of all such certificates into the exchange agent’s account with The Depository Trust Company in accordance with the proper procedures for such transfer, together with a properly completed and duly executed election form and any other documents required by the election form.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who do not submit a properly completed election form or revoke their election form before the election deadline and do not submit a new properly completed election form before the election deadline will have their shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock designated as non-election shares. Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates represented by elections that have been revoked will be promptly returned without charge to the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder revoking the election upon written request.

After the completion of the merger, the exchange agent will mail to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders who do not submit election forms or who have revoked such forms a letter of transmittal, together with instructions for the exchange of their Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock certificates for the merger consideration. Until Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders surrender their Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates for exchange after completion of the merger, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders will not be paid dividends or other distributions declared after the merger with respect to any Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock into which their Rome Bancorp, Inc. shares have been converted. When Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders surrender their Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will pay any unpaid dividends or other distributions, without interest. After the completion of the merger, there will be no further transfers of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates presented for transfer after the completion of the merger will be canceled and exchanged for the merger consideration.

If their Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock certificates have been either lost, stolen or destroyed, Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholders will have to prove your ownership of these certificates and that they were lost, stolen or destroyed before they receive any consideration for your shares. The election form includes instructions on how to provide evidence of ownership.

Accounting Treatment of the Merger

In accordance with current accounting guidance, the mergerMerger will be accounted for using the acquisition method. The result of this is that the recorded assets and liabilities of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will be carried forward at their recorded amounts, the historical operating results will be unchanged for the prior periods being reported on and that the assets and liabilities of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will be adjusted to fair value at the date of the merger.Merger. In addition, all identified intangibles will be recorded at fair value and included as part of the net assets acquired. To the extent that the purchase price, consisting of cash plus the number of shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be issued to former Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders and option holders at fair value, exceeds the fair value of the net assets including identifiable intangibles of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy at the mergerMerger date, that amount will be reported as goodwill. In accordance with current accounting guidance, goodwill will not be amortized but will be evaluated for impairment annually. Identified intangibles will be amortized over their estimated lives. Further, the acquisition method of


TABLE OF CONTENTS

accounting results in the operating results of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy being included in the operating results of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. beginning from the date of completion of the merger.Merger.

Material Tax Consequences of the Merger

General.  The following summary discusses the material anticipated U.S. federal income tax consequences of the mergerMerger applicable to a holder of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock who surrenders all of the stockholder’s common stock for shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and/orand cash in the merger.Merger. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations, judicial authorities, published positions of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and other applicable authorities, all as in effect on the date of this document and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). This discussion is limited to U.S. residents and citizens who hold their shares as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, assets held for investment). This discussion does not cover all U.S. federal income tax consequences of the mergerMerger and related transactions that may be relevant to holders of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock. This discussion also does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to a particular person or the tax consequences that may be relevant to persons subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws (including, among others, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities or foreign currencies, banks, insurance companies, financial institutions or persons who hold their shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction, persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders that exercise dissenters’ rights, persons that are, or hold their shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock through, partnerships or other pass-through entities, or persons who acquired their shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock through the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation). In addition, this discussion does not address any aspects of state, local, non-U.S. taxation or U.S. federal taxation other than income taxation. No ruling has been requested from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger.Merger. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the U.S. federal income tax consequences set forth below.

Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger,Merger, as well as the effects of state, local, non-U.S. tax laws and U.S. tax laws other than income tax laws.

Opinion Conditions.  It is a condition to the obligations of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. receive an opinion by Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick and that Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy receive an opinion by SNR Denton USNutter McClennen & Fish LLP to the effect that the mergerMerger will constitute a “reorganization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy both expect to be able to obtain the tax opinions if, as expected:

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy are able to deliver customary representations to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ and Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s respective tax counsel; and
there is no adverse change in U.S. federal income tax law.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Although the merger agreementMerger Agreement allows both Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy to waive the condition that tax opinions be delivered by Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick and SNR Denton USNutter McClennen & Fish LLP, neither party currently anticipates doing so. However, if this condition were waived, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy would re-solicit the approval of its stockholders before completing the merger.Merger.

In addition, in connection with the filing of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus forms a part, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick and SNR Denton USNutter McClennen & Fish LLP have delivered their opinions to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.,Legacy, respectively, dated as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus,Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, that the mergerMerger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Forms of these opinions have been filed as Exhibits 8.1 and 8.2 to the registration statement. Such opinions have been rendered on the basis of facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinions and factual representations contained in certificates of


TABLE OF CONTENTS

officers of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.,Legacy, all of which must continue to be true and accurate in all material respects as of the effective time of the merger.Merger.

If any of the representations or assumptions upon which the opinions are based are inconsistent with the actual facts, the tax consequences of the mergerMerger could be adversely affected. The determination by tax counsel as to whether the proposed mergerMerger will be treated as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code will depend upon the facts and law existing at the effective time of the proposed merger.Merger. The following discussion assumes that the mergerMerger will constitute a “reorganization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Exchange Solely for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock.  No gain or loss will be recognized by a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder who receives solely shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock (except for cash received in lieu of fractional shares, as discussed below) in exchange for all of his or her shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The tax basisMaterial Tax Consequences of the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received by a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder in such exchange will be equal (except for the basis attributable to any fractional shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, as discussed below) to the basis of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock surrendered in exchange for the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. If a Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder purchased or acquired Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock on different dates or at different prices, then solely for purposes of determining the basis of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received in the merger, such stockholder may designate which share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is received in exchange for each particular share of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The designation must be made on or before the date on which the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is received. For shares held through a broker, the designation is made by giving written notice to the broker. For shares held in certificate form by the stockholder, the designation is made by a written designation in the stockholder’s records. The holding period of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received will include the holding period of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock surrendered in exchange for the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, provided that such shares were held as capital assets of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder at the effective time of the merger.

Exchange Solely for Cash.Merger.  A Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder who receives solely cash in exchange for all of his or her shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock (and is not treated as constructively owning Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock after the merger under the circumstances referred to below under“— Possible Dividend Treatment”) will recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the cash received and such stockholder’s tax basis in the Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock surrendered in exchange for the cash. Such gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss, provided that such shares were held as capital assets of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder at the effective time of the merger. Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholder’s holding period is more than one year. The Internal Revenue Code contains limitations on the extent to which a taxpayer may deduct capital losses from ordinary income.

Exchange for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock and Cash.  A Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder who receives a combination of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and cash in exchange for his or her Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock will not be permitted to recognize any loss for federal income tax purposes. Such a stockholder will recognize gain, if any, equal to the lesser of (1) the amount of cash received or (2) the amount of gain “realized” in the transaction. The amount of gain a Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder “realizes” will equal the amount by which (a) the cash plus the fair market value at the effective time of the mergerMerger of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received exceeds (b) the stockholders’ basis in the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock to be surrendered in the exchange for the cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Any recognized gain could be taxed as a capital gain or a dividend, as described below. The tax basis of the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received by such Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder will be the same as the basis of the shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock surrendered in exchange for the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, plus any gain recognized by such stockholder in the merger,Merger, and minus any cash received by the stockholder in the merger.Merger. If a Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder purchased or acquired Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock on different dates or at different prices, then solely for purposes of determining the basis of the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received in the merger,Merger, such stockholder may designate which share of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is received in exchange for each particular share of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock. The designation must be made on or before the date on which the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock is received. For shares held through a broker, the designation is made by giving written notice to the broker. For shares held in certificate form by the stockholder, the designation is made by a written designation in the stockholder’s records. The holding period for shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received by such Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder will include such stockholder’s holding period for the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock surrendered in exchange for the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock, provided that such shares were held as capital assets of the stockholder at the effective time of the merger.Merger.

A Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder’s federal income tax consequences will also depend on whether his or her shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock were purchased at different times at different prices. If they were, the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder could realize gain with respect to some of the shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock and loss with respect to other shares. Such Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder would have to recognize such gain to the extent such stockholder receives cash with respect to those shares in which the stockholder’s adjusted tax basis is less than the amount of cash plus the fair market value at the effective time of the mergerMerger of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received, but could not recognize loss with respect to those shares in which the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder’s adjusted tax basis is greater than the amount of cash plus the fair market value at the effective time of the mergerMerger of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock received. Any disallowed loss would be included in the adjusted basis of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Such a Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor respecting the tax consequences of the mergerMerger to that stockholder.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Aggregate Divestiture Premium (Contingent Cash Consideration).  Each Legacy stockholder’s right to receive an allocable portion of any Aggregate Divestiture Premium (described on pages 66 and 67) that is required to be paid will be considered as additional consideration for such stockholder’s shares of Legacy common stock. The tax consequences to Legacy stockholders of the Aggregate Divestiture Premium, if any, will depend upon whether there will be, as of the effective time of the Merger, an ascertainable value for the Aggregate Divestiture Premium that Legacy stockholders will receive, and if not, whether the allocable portion of the Aggregate Divesture Premium in fact is received in a subsequent tax year for any Legacy stockholder. Under Section 1001 of the Internal Revenue Code, if the Merger includes consideration for which there is no ascertainable value as of the effective time of Merger, a Legacy stockholder will be permitted to treat the transaction as an “open transaction,” and to recover the taxpayer’s basis in Legacy common stock under the cost recovery method for reporting gain or loss. This “open transaction” treatment will be available, however, only if the Aggregate Divestiture Premium does not have an ascertainable value as of the effective time of the Merger. Under such circumstance, in the event that all Required Divestitures (described on pages 68 and 70) have not been made prior to the end of 2011, each Legacy stockholder would report the transaction for 2011 based on the proceeds received in 2011 and may apply in 2011 all of such stockholder’s tax basis in Legacy common stock to reduce the taxable income arising from the transaction. Any additional payments received after 2011 with respect to Required Divestitures would be reported in the year of receipt as additional gain from the Merger. As of the date of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, neither Berkshire Hills nor Legacy can predict whether the Aggregate Divestiture Premium will have an ascertainable value as of the effective time of the Merger.

Alternatively, if the Aggregate Divestiture Premium does have an ascertainable value as of the effective time of the Merger, the tax consequences will depend upon whether the allocable portion of the Aggregate Divesture Premium in fact is received in a subsequent tax year for any Legacy stockholder. For example, if a Legacy stockholder’s tax year ends on December 31, 2011 and the Merger occurs in 2011, but the Legacy stockholder’s allocable portion of the Aggregate Divestiture Premium is received after 2011, then the Internal Revenue Service will take the position that the Legacy stockholder should report the gain from the receipt of the stockholder’s portion of the Aggregate Divestiture Premium under the “installment method” of reporting under Section 453 of the Internal Revenue Code. The installment method differs from the cost-recovery method in that the tax basis of stock must be allocated between the payments to be received based on their values at effective time of the Merger. Each Legacy stockholder therefore would be required to defer application of a portion of their tax basis in Legacy common stock until the receipt of the stockholder’s portion of the Aggregate Divestiture Payment and, consequently, would likely have more taxable income in 2011. If the allocable portion of the Aggregate Divesture Premium in fact is received in the same tax year in which the Merger occurs, Legacy stockholders will treat their portion of the Aggregate Divestiture Premium as if it had been received at the effective time of the Merger. Neither Berkshire Hills nor Legacy can predict as of the date of this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus when the Aggregate Divestiture Premium, if any, would be paid to Legacy stockholders.

Legacy stockholders should be aware that the Internal Revenue Service takes the position that only in rare or unusual circumstances will an asset or right received in a merger not have an ascertainable value as of the effective time of the merger. Neither Berkshire Hills nor Legacy intends to seek any ruling or advice from the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the applicability of open transaction reporting to the Merger, and it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service could disagree with the position that the possibility of obtaining Aggregate Divestiture Premiums is an asset that cannot be valued, and that if such a position were asserted that it could be upheld by the Courts. In such a case the ability of a Legacy stockholder to apply its whole basis to reduce gain recognized in 2011 could be adversely effected. Accordingly, Legacy stockholders are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors concerning the recognition of income, gain or loss resulting from the receipt of rights to a portion of the proceeds from a Required Divestiture.

Possible Dividend Treatment.  In certain circumstances, a Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder who receives solely cash or a combination of cash and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in the mergerMerger may receive ordinary income, rather than capital gain, treatment on all or a portion of the gain recognized by that stockholder if the receipt of cash “has the effect of the distribution of a dividend.” The determination of whether a cash payment has such effect is based on a comparison of the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder’s proportionate interest in Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. after the merger


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Merger with the proportionate interest the stockholder would have had if the stockholder had received solely Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock in the merger.Merger. This could happen because of your purchase (or the purchase by a family member) of additional Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock or a repurchase of shares by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Hills. For purposes of this comparison, the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder may be deemed to constructively own shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock held by certain members of the stockholder’s family or certain entities in which the stockholder has an ownership or beneficial interest and certain stock options may be aggregated with the stockholder’s shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The amount of the cash payment that may be treated as a dividend is limited to the stockholder’s ratable share of the accumulated earnings and profits of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy at the effective time of the merger.Merger. Any gain that is not treated as a dividend will be taxed as a capital gain, provided that the stockholder’s shares were held as capital assets at the effective time of the merger.Merger. Because the determination of whether a cash payment will be treated as having the effect of a dividend depends primarily upon the facts and circumstances of each Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder, stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax treatment of any cash received in the merger.Merger. The maximum federal income tax rate applicable to dividends is 15% for 2010. For 2011, dividends are treated as ordinary income with a maximum federal income tax rate of 39.6%, but the treatment in 2011 may be subject to legislative change.2011.

Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares.  A Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder who holds Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock as a capital asset and who receives in the merger,Merger, in exchange for such stock, solely Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and cash in lieu of a fractional share interest in Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock will be treated as having received such cash in full payment for such fractional share of stock and as capital gain or loss, notwithstanding the dividend rules discussed above.

Backup Withholding.  Unless an exemption applies under the backup withholding rules of Section 3406 of the Internal Revenue Code, the exchange agent shall be required to withhold, and will withhold, 28% of any cash payments to which a Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder is entitled pursuant to the merger,Merger, unless the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. Legacy stockholder signs the substitute Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 enclosed with the letter of transmittal sent by the exchange agent. Unless an applicable exemption exists and is proved in a manner satisfactory to the exchange agent, this completed form provides the information, including the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder’s taxpayer identification number, and certification necessary to avoid backup withholding.

Dissenters’ Rights.  A Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder who exercises dissenters’ rights and receives solely cash should be treated as a stockholder receiving solely cash, as described above.

Tax Treatment of the Entities.  No gain or loss will be recognized by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy as a result of the merger.Merger.

Regulatory Matters Relating to the Merger

Merger.  The mergerMerger is subject to approval by the Office of Thrift Supervision.Supervision, the Massachusetts Division of Bank and the Massachusetts Board of Bank Incorporation (“BBI”). Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has filed[has filed] the required applications and notifications with the Office of Thrift Supervision.notifications.

The Office of Thrift Supervision may not approve any transaction that would result in a monopoly or otherwise substantially lessen competition or restrain of trade, unless it finds that the anti-competitive effects of the transaction are clearly outweighed by the public interest. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision considers the financial and managerial resources of the companies and their subsidiary institutions and the convenience and needs of the communities to be served. Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), the Office of Thrift Supervision must take into account the record of performance of each company in meeting the credit needs of its entire communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, served by each company. Berkshire Bank has a satisfactory CRA rating; The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks has a satisfactory CRA rating.

Federal law requires publication of notice of, and the opportunity for public comment on, the applications submitted by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Bank for approval of the mergerMerger and authorizes the Office of Thrift Supervision to hold a public hearing in connection with the application if it determines that such a hearing would be appropriate. Any such hearing or comments provided by third parties could prolong the period during which the application is subject to review. In addition, under federal law, a period of 30 days must expire following approval by the Office of Thrift Supervision within which period the Department of Justice may file objections to the mergerMerger under the federal antitrust laws. This waiting period may be reduced to 15 days if the Department of Justice has not provided any adverse comments relating to the competitive factors of the transaction. If the Department of Justice were to commence an antitrust action, that action


TABLE OF CONTENTS

would stay the effectiveness of Office of Thrift Supervision approval of the mergerMerger unless a court specifically orders otherwise. In reviewing the merger,Merger, the Department of Justice could analyze the merger’sMerger’s effect on competition differently than the Office of Thrift Supervision, and thus it is possible that the Department of Justice could reach a different conclusion than the Office of Thrift Supervision regarding the merger’sMerger’s competitive effects. As part of its regulatory filings, Berkshire Hills has requested the bank regulators and the United States Department of Justice to authorize Berkshire Hills and Legacy to divest approximately $162.0 million in deposits, as well as four Legacy branch offices located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. There can be no assurance as to whether the bank regulators or the United States Department of Justice will accept, deny or modify the proposed divestiture plan, or the timing of such approvals. See “Risk Factors —  Berkshire Hills may be unsuccessful in pursuing a plan to divest certain deposits and other liabilities. Such proposed divestiture plan may constitute a material adverse effect on the parties.

Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, the decision of the BBI is based on whether or not competition among banking institutions will be unreasonably affected and whether or not public convenience and advantage will be promoted by the Merger. In making such determination, the BBI shall consider a showing of “net new benefits,” which may include initial capital investments, job creation plans, consumer and business services, commitments to maintain and open branch offices within a bank’s delineated local community and such other matters as the BBI may deem necessary or advisable.

The Bank Merger.  Immediately followingFollowing the merger of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy with and into Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. expectsintends to merge The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks with and into Berkshire Bank.Bank, but retains the right to hold Legacy Banks as a separate subsidiary. In connection with a merger of Legacy Banks with and into Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills may, subject to regulatory approval, include the “Legacy” name in the name of Berkshire Bank’s branch offices in Berkshire County, Massachusetts and may continue to do so until for up to two years from the completion of the Merger or until such time as Berkshire Bank rebrands its banking offices in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. Berkshire Hills will designate the headquarters of Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Bank as 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts. The bank merger is subject to the approval by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation under the Bank Merger Act. In granting its approval under the Bank Merger Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation must consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the existing and proposed institutions and the convenience and needs of the communities to be served.

The bank merger is also subject to approval by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks under the bank merger provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws. The regulatory standards for the bank merger are similar to those applicable to the merger.Merger. The bank merger cannot be completed until arrangements satisfactory to the Massachusetts Depositors Insurance Fund, which insures the deposits of Massachusetts-chartered savings banks in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance limits, have been made. The Depositors Insurance Fund informed the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks in a letter dated that arrangements satisfactory to the Depositors Insurance Fund had been made in connection with the bank merger.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Berkshire Bank filed the requisite applications for the bank merger with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on April 1, 2011 and with the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks on November 17, 2010., 2011.

In addition, a period of 15 to 30 days must expire following approval by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation before completion of the mergerMerger is allowed, within which period the United States Department of Justice may file objections to the mergerMerger under the federal antitrust laws. WhileAs part of its regulatory filings, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.has requested the bank regulators and Rome Bancorp, Inc. believe that the likelihood of objection by theUnited States Department of Justice is remoteto authorize Berkshire Hills and Legacy to divest approximately $162.0 million in this case, theredeposits, as well as four Legacy branch offices located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. There can be no assurance thatas to whether the bank regulators or the United States Department of Justice will not initiate proceedingsaccept, deny or modify the proposed divestiture plan, or the timing of such approvals. See “Risk Factors — Berkshire Hills may be unsuccessful in pursuing a plan to blockdivest certain deposits and other liabilities. Such proposed divestiture plan may constitute a material adverse effect on the merger, or that the Attorney General of the State will not challenge the merger, or if any proceeding is instituted or challenge is made, as to the result of the challenge.parties.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The mergerMerger cannot proceed in the absence of the requisite regulatory approvals. SeeDescription of the Merger — Conditions to Completing the Merger”Merger and— Terminating the Merger Agreement.” There can be no assurance that the requisite regulatory approvals will be obtained, and if obtained, there can be no assurance as to the date of any approval. There can also be no assurance that any regulatory approvals will not contain a condition or requirement that causes the approvals to fail to satisfy the condition set forth in the merger agreementMerger Agreement and described underDescription of the Merger — Conditions to Completing the Merger.

The approval of any application merely implies the satisfaction of regulatory criteria for approval, which does not include review of the mergerMerger from the standpoint of the adequacy of the cash consideration or the exchange ratio for converting Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock. Furthermore, regulatory approvals do not constitute an endorsement or recommendation of the merger.Merger.

Anti-Competitive Matters.

Federal law requires publication of notice of, and the opportunity for public comment on, the applications submitted by Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Bank for approval of the Merger and authorizes the Office of Thrift Supervision to hold a public hearing in connection with the application if it determines that such a hearing would be appropriate. Any such hearing or comments provided by third parties could prolong the period during which the application is subject to review. In addition, under federal law, a period of 30 days must expire following approval by the Office of Thrift Supervision within which period the Department of Justice may file objections to the Merger under the federal antitrust laws. This waiting period may be reduced to 15 days if the Department of Justice has not provided any adverse comments relating to the competitive factors of the transaction. If the Department of Justice were to commence an antitrust action, that action would stay the effectiveness of Office of Thrift Supervision approval of the Merger unless a court specifically orders otherwise. In reviewing the Merger, the Department of Justice could analyze the Merger’s effect on competition differently than the Office of Thrift Supervision, and thus it is possible that the Department of Justice could reach a different conclusion than the Office of Thrift Supervision regarding the Merger’s competitive effects. As part of its regulatory filings, Berkshire Hills has requested the bank regulators and the United States Department of Justice to authorize Berkshire Hills and Legacy to divest approximately $162.0 million in deposits, as well as four Legacy branch offices located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. There can be no assurance as to whether the bank regulators or the United States Department of Justice will accept, deny or modify the proposed divestiture plan, or the timing of such approvals. See “Risk Factors —  Berkshire Hills may be unsuccessful in pursuing a plan to divest certain deposits and other liabilities. Such proposed divestiture plan may constitute a material adverse effect on the parties.

In addition, a period of 15 to 30 days must expire following approval by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation before completion of the Merger is allowed, within which period the United States Department of Justice may file objections to the Merger under the federal antitrust laws. As part of its regulatory filings, Berkshire Hills has requested the bank regulators and the United States Department of Justice to authorize Berkshire Hills and Legacy to divest approximately $162.0 million in deposits, as well as four Legacy branch offices located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. There can be no assurance as to whether the bank regulators or the United States Department of Justice will accept, deny or modify the proposed divestiture plan, or the timing of such approvals. See “Risk Factors — Berkshire Hills may be unsuccessful in pursuing a plan to divest certain deposits and other liabilities. Such proposed divestiture plan may constitute a material adverse effect on the parties.

Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger that are Different from Yours

Share Ownership.  On the record date for the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy special meeting, Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s directors and officers beneficially owned, in the aggregate, shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s common stock, representing approximately% of the outstanding shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock.

As described below, certain of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s officers and directors have interests in the mergerMerger that are in addition to, or different from, the interests of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s stockholders generally. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s board of directors was aware of these conflicts of interest and took them into account in approving the merger.

Settlement Agreements.  Contemporaneously withMerger. These interests, which provide for payments of approximately $  million in the execution of the merger agreement, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., Inc, Berkshire Bank, Rome Bancorp, Inc. and The Rome Savings Bank entered into settlement agreements (“Settlement Agreements”) with the two named executive officers and five other senior officers of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and The Rome Savings Bank in order to quantify and settle the benefits owed to the executives underaggregate, include the following agreements maintained by Rome Bancorp, Inc. and The Rome Savings Bank: (i) an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Charles M. Sprock, dated November 28, 2007; (ii) an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between The Rome Savings Bank and Charles M. Sprock, dated November 28, 2007; (iii) an Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement for Senior Officers between The Rome Savings Bank and David C. Nolan, dated November 28, 2007; (iv) Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreements for Senior Officers between The Rome Savings Bank and five other senior officers of The Rome Savings Bank; and (v) the Benefit Restoration Plan of Rome Bancorp, Inc., Amended and Restated, effective as of December 21, 2005.arrangements:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Employment AgreementAgreements with Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy.  In accordance with Mr. Sprock’seach of Messrs. P. Sullivan’s and Dunlaevy’s Settlement Agreement,Agreements, at the closing date of the merger, Mr. Sprock’sMerger, each of Messrs. Sullivan’s and Dunlaevy’s employment agreements will be terminated and heMessrs. Sullivan and Dunlaevy will be entitled to a cash lump sum payment from Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy equal to $1,025,067,$1,151,800 and $1,437,302, respectively, in lieu of the payment due under the employment agreements. However, becauseagreement. In addition, Mr. Sprock is considered a “specified employee”Dunlaevy’s settlement agreement provides him with an additional tax indemnification payment if any payments or benefits provided to him trigger liability under Section 409ASections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), such payment cannotCode.

Offer Letter for Patrick J. Sullivan.  Berkshire Hills presented an offer letter to Patrick J. Sullivan, which the executive accepted, on December 21, 2010. The offer letter provides that Mr. Sullivan will serve Berkshire Hills as Executive Vice President of Corporate Banking and Wealth Management and report directly to the President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sullivan will receive a base salary of $375,000, a sign-on bonus of $200,000 payable with his first paycheck, an equity grant of 5,000 shares of restricted stock with a one year vesting period to be made within two weeks of Mr. Sullivan’s hire date, an annual performance equity grant with a target value of $100,000 of restricted stock (50% of which will be performance based), participation in the performance management incentive plan (with a current target bonus of 35% of base salary), and certain benefits including a country club membership with a maximum value of $5,000 and an automobile allowance of $12,000 per year. In addition, Mr. Sullivan will be entitled to him until six months followingtwo years of continued medical and dental coverage, at no cost to Mr. Sullivan, in the event his “separation from service” (as defined in Code Section 409A) with Rome Bancorp, Inc. or its successor, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Accordingly, the Settlement Agreement provides for the cash severance payment to be paidemployment is terminated by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Until such time, it will be held in a rabbi trust for the benefit of Mr. Sprock and invested in investment-grade fixed-income securities, mutual funds or other pooled investment vehicles. The cash severance payment, as adjusted for investment


TABLE OF CONTENTS

experience, will be distributed on the first day of the seventh month following Mr. Sprock’s separation from service, subject to applicable income withholding taxes.at anytime.

Change in Control Agreements with The Rome Savings Bank.Legacy Banks.  In accordance with their respective Settlement Agreements, theThe change in control agreements for Mr. Nolanpreviously entered into with Legacy, Legacy Banks and five other seniorour named executive officers, of The Rome Savings Bank will be terminated, effective asMs. Kimberly Mathews, Messrs. Paul Bruce and Richard Sullivan, provide such individuals with severance benefits in the event of the closing datetermination of their employment by the officers for good reason or by the employer without cause within twelve (12) months following a change in control. The amount of the Merger,severance benefit equals (i) one times the sum of base salary and in lieuthe highest rate of any payments or benefits under such change in control agreements, the executives will be entitledbonus paid to the payments set forth inofficer during the Settlement Agreementstwo years prior to termination, and (ii) twelve (12) months of continued life insurance and non-taxable medical and dental coverage, on substantially the earlier ofsame terms as the date of executive’scoverage maintained for the officer prior to the officer’s termination of employment by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., Berkshire Bank, Rome Bancorp, Inc. or The Rome Savings Bank or 90 days after the closing date at which time, the executive’s employment will terminate.employment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an executive who is terminated for cause will not be entitled to any payment under either the change in control agreement or Settlement Agreement. For this purpose, cause willagreement. If payable, the cash severance payable to Ms. Kimberly Mathews, Messrs. Paul Bruce and Richard Sullivan is estimated to be defined as personal dishonesty, willful misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit, intentional failure to perform stated duties, willful violation of any law, rule or regulation (other than traffic violations or similar offenses) or a final cease(and may not exceed) $165,000, $228,000 and desist order and will be determined in the good faith and sole discretion of Charles M. Sprock. The Rome Savings Bank or Berkshire Bank will pay lump sum$220,000, respectively, less tax withholding. Any cash severance payments to Mr. Nolanshall be made in a lump sum with the amountnext regularly scheduled payroll following the date of $408,018, less tax withholding, and to the otherofficer’s termination of employment. Additionally, five of Legacy’s senior officers who are entitlednot named executive officers have previously entered into one or two year change in control agreements with Legacy and Legacy Banks. The terms of such change in control agreements are substantially similar to such payments under the Settlement Agreements an aggregate amountterms described above, except that the two year change in control agreement provides for a severance benefit equal to (i) two times the sum of $737,714, less tax withholding.

Duringbase salary and the periodhighest rate of bonus paid to the officer during the two years prior to theirtermination, and (ii) twenty-four (24) months of continued life insurance and non-taxable medical and dental coverage, on substantially the same terms as the coverage maintained for the officer prior to the officer’s termination of employment,employment. If payable, the cash severance payment will be held in a rabbi trust for the benefit of each officer and invested in investment-grade fixed-income securities, mutual funds or other pooled investment vehicles. Upon termination of employment, the cash severance payment, as adjusted for investment experience and subject to applicable withholding tax, will be distributedpayable to the officer.

In addition, for the period that each executive continuesfive senior officers is estimated to be (and may not exceed) $1,041,000 in the employment of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Bank following the closing date, such officer’s base salary will be increased to two times the officer’s current base salary.aggregate, less withholding taxes.

Benefit Restoration Plan.Settlement Agreements.  Legacy shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause each Legacy Bank employee that has a change in control agreement to enter into a settlement agreement in order to quantify and settle the benefits owed to the officers under their respective change in control agreements, as described in the above paragraph. As of the date hereof, none of these employees has entered into a settlement agreement.

Termination of Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement and Distribution of Benefits.   Mr. Charles M. SprockJ. Williar Dunlaevy is the sole participant in the Benefit Restoration Plan.Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement. In accordance with his Settlementthe Merger Agreement atand Mr. Dunlaevy’s settlement agreement, on or prior to the closing date of the Merger, the Benefit Restoration PlanSupplemental Executive Retirement Agreement will be terminated and Mr. SprockDunlaevy will be entitled to a cash lump sum payment under the Settlement Agreement, equal to $358,560,$1,549,395, subject to applicable withholding, in lieu of any benefit under the Benefit Restoration Plan. Because Mr. Sprock is a specified employee under Code Section 409A, such payment will be held and paid to Mr. Sprock on the first day of the seventh month following his separation from service,payable in accordance with Codethe requirements of Section 409A. Following409A of the closing date and until such amount is distributed, it will be held in a rabbi trust and invested in the same manner as the remainder of theInternal Revenue Code. All amounts to be paid under such agreement are fully vested without regard to himthe change in control.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Termination of Director Fee Continuation Plan and Distribution of Benefits.  In accordance with the Merger Agreement, on or prior to the closing date of the Merger, the Director Fee Continuation Plan will be terminated and the participants will be entitled to a cash lump sum payment, payable in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. All amounts to be paid under such agreement are fully vested without regard to the change in control, however, absent the change in control, such amounts would be payable for five years commencing upon termination of their service. Non-employee directors Dellea, Klausmeyer, Pasko, Raser, Trask and Winsor will receive $200,000, $250,667, $221,530, $162,657, $237,243 and $198,667, respectively, upon the termination of the Director Fee Continuation Plan of Legacy.

Three Year Change in Control Agreement and Severance Agreement with Patrick J. Sullivan.   Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Bank have entered into a Three Year Change in Control Agreement and Severance Agreement with Mr. Patrick J. Sullivan. The change in control agreement provides that upon an involuntary termination, other than for cause, or voluntary termination (upon the occurrence of circumstances specified in the agreement) following a change in control of Berkshire Hills or Berkshire Bank, Mr. Sullivan would be entitled to a cash severance payment equal to three times his average annual compensation for the five years preceding the change in control, and life insurance and non-taxable medical, dental and disability coverage substantially identical to the coverage maintained for the executive prior to his termination of employment for 36 months following his termination of employment. The severance payments may be reduced by the minimum amount necessary to avoid triggering liability under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Sullivan must comply with a one-year non-competition and non-disclosure provision following the receipt of severance payments under the Settlement Agreement.agreement.

The severance agreement provides that upon an involuntary termination, other than for cause, or voluntary termination (upon the occurrence of the circumstances specified in the agreement), Mr. Sullivan would be entitled to a cash severance payment equal to three times his base salary less a pro rata amount for each day employed since the closing date of the merger, and continued medical and dental coverage, at no cost to Mr. Sullivan, for 36 months following his termination of employment. In the event of Mr. Sullivan’s termination of employment in connection with or following a change in control of Berkshire Hills or Berkshire Bank, Mr. Sullivan shall not be entitled to any benefits under the severance agreement and shall instead be entitled to the benefits under his Three Year Change in Control Agreement as described above. Mr. Sullivan must comply with a one-year non-competition provision following the receipt of severance payments under the agreement.

Non-Competition and Consulting Agreement with Charles M. Sprock.J. Williar Dunlaevy.  Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Bank have entered into a Non-Competition and Consulting Agreement with Mr. Charles M. SprockJ. Williar Dunlaevy pursuant to which Mr. SprockDunlaevy will perform consulting services as a liaison to The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks Foundation for a period of sixtwelve months following the merger. In addition, Mr. SprockDunlaevy will agree not to compete with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Bank for a period of eighteentwenty-four months following the merger for the benefit of any business within 2560 miles of any office of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Berkshire Bank or any subsidiary. During such eighteentwenty-four month period, Mr. SprockDunlaevy has also agreed not to solicit or offer employment to any employee of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Berkshire Bank or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates that would cause such person(s) to terminate employment and accept employment with or provide services to any business that competes with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Berkshire Bank within 2560 miles of any office of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. or Berkshire Bank or any subsidiary. In exchange for the consulting services and the agreement not to compete or solicit, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Bank have agreed to pay Mr. Sprock $225,000,Dunlaevy $400,000, with $150,000 payable by lump sum at the closing date of the merger and $250,000 payable in monthly installments over the twelve month consulting period.

Cash Payment for Outstanding Options.  Under the terms of the merger agreement, outstanding Rome Bancorp, Inc.the Legacy 2006 Equity Incentive Plan shall remain effective and shall be maintained by Berkshire Hills; however, (i) each stock options, whether or not vested;option granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan will cease to represent an option to purchase Legacy common stock and will be terminated with a paymentconverted automatically into an option to purchase Berkshire Hills common stock equal to the holderproduct (rounded down to the nearest whole share) of the option of an amount of cash equal to (i) the greater of (A) the excess, if any, of $11.25 over the applicable per share price of that option or (B) $1.00, multiplied by (ii) the number of shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock subject to such Legacy stock option, and (B) 0.6265, at an exercise price per share (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal to (1) the exercise price of such Legacy stock option divided by (2) 0.6265, (ii) notwithstanding the foregoing, each stock option granted on November 29, 2006 with an exercise price of $16.03 will be


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

cancelled and the holder thereof will receive $3.00 for each cancelled stock option, and (iii) notwithstanding the foregoing, all stock options held by J. Williar Dunlaevy shall be converted automatically into stock options to purchase Berkshire Hills common stock that the holder could have purchased with the option if the holder had exercised the option immediately prioras provided in this paragraph and such options shall not be entitled to the effective time. No outstanding Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock options may be exercised during the pendency of the merger.any cash payment. Messrs. SprockRichard Sullivan and Nolan,Paul Bruce who hold 147,50072,200 and 59,00041,200 stock options, respectively, will receive a cash payment of $147,500$216,600 and $59,000,$123,600, respectively, upon termination of the option.options granted on November 29, 2006 and their remaining options will be substituted for stock options to purchase Berkshire Hills common stock as provided in this paragraph. All of the stock options held by Patrick Sullivan, Mr. Dunlaevy and Ms. Mathews will be substituted for stock options to purchase Berkshire Hills common stock as provided in this paragraph. Non-employee directors Engelbert, Grow, Hinman, LavalDellea, Klausmeyer, Pasko, Raser, Trask and ValentineWinsor, who each hold 22,700 stock options, will each receive $29,500$68,100 in cash upon the termination of 29,500 options heldthe options.

Two New Directors.  In accordance with the Merger Agreement, J. Williar Dunlaevy and one other person who is a director of Legacy, as determined by eachBerkshire Hills, shall be appointed and elected to the Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Banks boards of them. Asdirectors. The fees paid to these directors will be the same as similarly situated board members of the date of the merger agreement, the exercise price of all outstanding Rome Bancorp, Inc. stock options exceeded $11.25.Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Bank.

Acceleration of Vesting of Restricted Stock Awards.  Under the terms of the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy 2006 Recognition and RetentionEquity Incentive Plan, restricted stock awards that have not yet vested will become fully vested upon the occurrence of a change of control. For purposesNone of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan the approval of the merger by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stockholders will be a change of control. Namednamed executive officers, Charles M. Sprock and David C. Nolan have 11,800 and 4,720 shares ofofficers or non-employee directors hold restricted stock respectively. Five other senior officers will vest in an aggregate of 5,340 shares of restricted stock. Non-employee directors Engelbert, Grow, Hinman, Laval and Valentine each have 2,360 shares of restricted stock that will vest as a result of the change in control.

Termination of Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan and Distribution of Benefits.  In accordance with the merger agreement, the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan of Rome Bancorp, Inc. will be terminated immediately prior to the effective time, and the amounts due under such plan will be paid in a lump sum to the participants on or prior to the effective time, in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. All amounts to be paid under such plan are fully vested without regard to the change in control, however, absent the change in control, such amounts would be paid to the directors in a single lump sum within 30 days following the end of the year in which their termination of service occurs, or if different, in accordance with an election made by the director under the terms of the plan. Non-employee directors Engelbert, Grow, Hinman and Valentine will receive $283,480, $163,178, $358,346 and $248,446, respectively, upon the termination of the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan of Rome Bancorp, Inc.

Payment to Director.  In accordance with the merger agreement, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has agreed that Rome Bancorp, Inc. shall pay to John Reinhardt a payment of $25,000 upon the completion of the merger if Mr. Reinhardt remains a director of Rome Bancorp, Inc. on the date immediately prior thereto. Such payment to Mr. Reinhardt was agreed upon because he does not hold any stock options or restricted stock.

Advisory Board.  In accordance with the merger agreement, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has agreed to establish an advisory board comprised of certain members of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors. The composition of such advisory board and the fees paid to the advisory board members will be determined by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. prior to the effective time.awards.

Indemnification.  Pursuant to the merger agreement, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has agreed that it will indemnify, defend and hold harmless each present and former officer, director or employee of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy and its subsidiary (as defined in the merger agreement) against all losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses (including attorney’s fees), liabilities, judgments and amounts that are paid in settlement (with the approval of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) of or in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, based in whole or in part on, or arising in whole or in part out of, the fact that such person is or was a director, officer or employee of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy or its subsidiary if such claim pertains to any matter of fact arising, existing or occurring at or before the closing date (including, without limitation, the merger and other transactions contemplated thereby), regardless of whether such claim is asserted or claimed before or after the effective time.

Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance.  Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has further agreed, for a period of six years after the effective date, to cause the persons serving as officers and directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy immediately prior to the effective date to continue to be covered by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s current directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy (provided that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may substitute therefore policies of at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions which are substantially no less advantageous than such policy) with respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective date


TABLE OF CONTENTS

which were committed by such officers and directors in their capacity as such. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. is not required to spend more than 175% of the annual cost currently incurred by Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy for its insurance coverage.

The following table sets forth the estimated potential severance benefits to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s named executive officers on termination of employment in connection with a change in control. This table does not include the value of benefits that the named executive officers are vested in without regard to the occurrence of a change in control:

       
Executive Cash(1)
($)
 Equity(2)
($)
 Pension/
NQDC
($)
 Perquisites/
Benefits
($)
 Tax
Reimbursements
($)
 Other(3)
($)
 Total
($)
Charles M. Sprock  1,025,067   280,250   -0-   -0-   -0-   225,000   1,530,317 
David C. Nolan  408,018   112,100   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   520,118 
       
Executive Cash
($)
 Equity
($)(2)
 Pension/
NQDC
($)
 Perquisites/
Benefits
($)(3)
 Tax
Reimbursements
($)
 Other
($)
 Total
($)
Paul Bruce $228,000  $147,785  $  $41,558  $  $  $417,343 
Williar Dunlaevy $1,437,302  $412,274  $  $  $  $  $1,849,576 
Patrick Sullivan $1,150,000  $244,864  $  $  $  $  $1,394,864 
Richard Sullivan $220,000  $279,942  $  $53,302  $  $  $553,244 
Kimberly Mathews $165,000  $36,882  $  $11,0017  $  $  $212,839 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1)Includes lump sum cash severance paymentsAssumes date of $1,025,067 and $408,018 under settlement agreements entered into by Messrs. Sprock and Nolan, respectively, in lieu of any cash severance payment under such person’s employment agreement. Does not include a lump sum cash payment in the amount of $358,560 payable to Mr. Sprock upon termination of the Benefit Restoration Plan as such amount was vested without regardemployment in connection with a change in control is September 1, 2011; valuation of options that will not be cashed out in connection with change in control is determined pursuant to the completion of the merger.Rev. Proc. 2003-38, using applicable federal rates for April 2011.
(2)Includes cash paymentsConsists of $1.00 per option share for(A)with respect to Mr. Paul Bruce, (i) unvested options to acquire 147,500656 shares held by Mr. Sprock andof Legacy common stock valued at closing in the amount of $2,394 as to which vesting would accelerate at closing, (ii) options to acquire 59,00041,200 shares held by Mr. Nolan. The options exercise price is greater than the cashof Legacy common stock to be cashed out in consideration that will be paid for the shares in the merger, however, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has agreed to pay the greater of the positive spread between the cash consideration$3.00/share, i.e., $123,600, and the exercise price or $1.00. In addition, 11,800 and 4,720 unvested(iii) 1,640 shares of restricted Legacy stock held by Messrs. Sprockvalued at closing at $21,791 as to which vesting will accelerate at closing; (B)with respect to Mr. Williar Dunlaevy, (i) unvested options to acquire 46,000 shares of Legacy common stock valued at closing in the amount of $149,714 as to which vesting will accelerate at closing, and Nolan, respectively,(ii) 19,760 shares of restricted Legacy stock valued at closing at $262,560 as to which vesting will become vestedaccelerate at closing; (C)with respect to Mr. Patrick Sullivan, (i) unvested options to acquire 20,000 shares of Legacy common stock valued at closing in the amount of $138,564 as a resultto which vesting will accelerate at closing, and (ii) 8,000 shares of restricted Legacy stock valued at closing at $106,300 as to which vesting will accelerate at closing; (D)with respect to Mr. Richard Sullivan, (i) unvested options to acquire 2,420 shares of Legacy common stock valued at closing in the changeamount of $8,853 as to which vesting will accelerate at closing, (ii) options to acquire 72,000 shares of Legacy common stock to be cashed out in controlconsideration of $3.00/share, i.e., $216,600, and (iii) 4,120 shares of restricted Legacy stock valued at a fair market valueclosing at $54,744 as to which vesting will accelerate at closing; and (E)with respect to Ms. Kimberly Mathews, (i) unvested options to acquire 4,862 shares of $11.25 per share.Legacy common stock valued at closing in the amount of $20,877 as to which vesting will accelerate at closing, and (ii) 1,200 shares of restricted Legacy stock valued at closing at $15,945 as to which vesting will accelerate at closing.
(3)Includes $225,000Consists of (A) with respect to which Mr. Sprock will be entitled underPaul Bruce, (i) projected premium(s) of $18,833.96 for one-year of medical and dental insurance coverage continuation, (ii) projected premium(s) of $14,323.68 for one-year of life insurance coverage, and (iii) a Consultingpayment of $8,400 for outplacement services; (B) with respect to Mr. Richard Sullivan, (i) projected premium(s) of $11,010.27 for one-year of medical, dental and Non-Compete Agreement entered intovision insurance coverage continuation, (ii) projected premium(s) of $32,292 for one-year of life insurance coverage, and (iii) a payment of $10,000 for outplacement services; and (C) with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.respect to Ms. Kimberly Mathews, (i) projected premium(s) of $6,267.15 for one-year of life insurance coverage, and Berkshire Bank.(ii) a payment of $4,750.01 for outplacement services.

Employee Matters

Each person who is an employee of The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks as of the closing of the mergerMerger (whose employment is not specifically terminated upon the closing) will become an employee of Berkshire Bank and will be eligible to participate in group health, medical, dental, life, disability and other welfare plans available to similarly situated employees of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. on the same basis that it provides such coverage to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. employees. With respect to any welfare plan or program of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. determines provides benefits of the same type as a plan maintained by Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will continue the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy plan until such employees become eligible for the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. plan so that there is no gap in coverage. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will give credit to continuing Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy employees for purposes of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ vacation and other paid leave programs for their accrued and unpaid vacation and/or leave balance with Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy.

Current employees of The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks who remain employed until the closing date will be eligible to participate in the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. 401(k) plan following the date determined by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. on which the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy 401(k) Plan will be terminated or replaced by such plan. Subject to the occurrence of the effective time, the Rome Bancorp, Inc.The Legacy employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), which was terminated in August 2010, will, be terminated as provided inat least five business days prior to the ESOP. Anyclosing date, repay the outstanding ESOP loan will be repaid from the unallocated shares held in the ESOP and the remaining unallocated shares will be allocated to the accounts of individuals in the ESOP as provided in the ESOP. The balance of the shares and any other assets remaining in the ESOP will be distributed to ESOP participants after the receipt of a favorable determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will pay each employee of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy who is not otherwise covered by a specific change in control agreement whose employment is terminated (other than for cause) or who is not offered employment with Berkshire Hills or resigns for good reason on or within 12 months following the closing date of the merger a lump sum cash payment equal to two weeks of such employee’s annual cash compensation for each full year of serviceMerger severance benefits under Berkshire Hill’s severance plan or Legacy’s severance plan, if more favorable.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

with Rome Bancorp, Inc., with a minimum of eight weeks and a maximum of 26 weeks. Additionally, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will provide transitional counseling for outplacement of employees.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. will beUnder the Merger Agreement, Legacy is entitled to enter into agreements to pay bonusesdiscretionary retention compensation to certain employees of Rome Bancorp, Inc. to encourage such employee to continue in the employee of Rome Bancorp, Inc. until the effective time with the payment made on the effective time,Legacy, including its executive officers, provided that the aggregate amount of such bonuses shall not exceed $500,000$700,000 in the aggregate or certain limits per individual that have been agreed to between the parties.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Rome Savings Bank maintains a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, which was amended in December 2002 to cease the accrual of any further benefits. The benefits under the pension plan are based on the employee’s years of service and compensation. The Rome Savings Bank funding policy is to contribute annually at least the minimum required to meet the funding standards set forth under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of plan assets under the pension plan was $5,305,515 and the estimated accumulated benefit obligation was $6,042,479. The merger agreement does not address the pension plan. Consequently, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may continue to maintain the pension plan as a frozen plan or terminate the pension plan In February 2011, Legacy made certain bonus payments in accordance with the requirementsMerger Agreement, including bonus payments of ERISA$200,000, $70,000, $60,000 and the Internal Revenue Code. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has made no determination as$20,000 to how the pension plan will be handled.Mr. Patrick Sullivan, Ms. Kimberly Mathews, Messrs. Paul Bruce and Richard Sullivan, respectively.

Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy Retiree Medical Benefits

The Rome Savings Bank providesLegacy Banks provided health care and life insurance benefits to certain retired full-time employees. The Rome Savings Bank pays 50% of the total health care premium up to a maximum of $152.12 per month for single coverage and $304.24 per month for two-person coverage and the retired employee and surviving spouse pay the remaining portion of the insurance premium. The Rome Savings Bank pays the full cost of the life insurance coverage. As of December 31, 2009, the future cost of the benefits was estimated to be $2,532,348. The merger agreement does not address this benefit. Consequently, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may continue this benefit in its current form or change the benefit structure inIn accordance with ERISA and the requirements ofMerger Agreement, Legacy Banks terminated the Internal Revenue Code. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has made no determination as to how this benefit will be handled.retiree medical plan effective March 1, 2011.

Operations of Berkshire Bank after the Merger

AfterThe Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Legacy with and into Berkshire Hills, with Berkshire Hills as the surviving entity. Following the merger of Legacy with and into Berkshire Hills, Berkshire Hills intends to merge Legacy Banks with and into Berkshire Bank, but retains the right to hold Legacy Banks as a separate subsidiary. In connection with a merger of Legacy Banks with and The Rome Savingsinto Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills may, subject to regulatory approval, include the former offices“Legacy” name in the name of The Rome Savings Bank will operate asBerkshire Bank’s branch offices in Berkshire County, Massachusetts and may continue to do so until for up to two (2) years from the completion of the Merger or until such time as Berkshire Bank rebrands its banking offices in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. Berkshire Hills will designate the headquarters of Berkshire Hills and Berkshire Bank under the name “Berkshire Bank.”as 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts.

Restrictions on Resale of Shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock

All shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock issued to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s stockholders in connection with the mergerMerger will be freely transferable. This proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus does not cover any resales of the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be received by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s stockholders upon completion of the merger,Merger, and no person may use this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus in connection with any resale.

Time of Completion

Unless the parties agree otherwise and unless the merger agreementMerger Agreement has otherwise been terminated, the closing of the mergerMerger will take place on a date designated by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. that is no later than 30 days following the date on which all of the conditions to the mergerMerger contained in the merger agreementMerger Agreement are satisfied or waived. See “—Conditions to Completing the Merger.” On the closing date, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will file a certificateCertificate of mergerMerger with the Delaware Secretary of State merging Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Hills. The mergerMerger will become effective at the time stated in the certificate of merger.Merger.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy are working to complete the merger quickly. It is currently expected that the mergerMerger will be completed during the firstthird quarter of 2011. However, because completion of the mergerMerger is subject to regulatory approvals and other conditions, the parties cannot be certain of the actual timing.

Legacy Banks Foundation

Legacy agrees to recommend to the Board of Directors of the Legacy Banks Foundation (“Legacy Foundation”) that the majority of the current Board of Directors of the Legacy Foundation resign as of the closing of the Merger and that a majority of the Legacy Foundation Board consist of Berkshire Hills representatives (“Berkshire Hills Foundation Representatives”) as of Closing. Such Berkshire Hills Foundation Representatives shall be selected by J. Williar Dunlaevy and agreed to by Berkshire Hills. In addition Legacy agrees to recommend to the Legacy Foundation that J. Williar Dunlaevy be appointed the chairman of the Legacy Foundation and that Patrick Sullivan be appointed an officer of the Legacy Foundation.

Conditions to Completing the Merger

Berkshire Hills’ and Legacy’s obligations to consummate the Merger are conditioned on the following:

approval of the Merger Agreement by Legacy’s stockholders;

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Rome Savings Bank Foundation.

The Rome Savings Bank Foundation will be merged with and into the Berkshire Bank Foundation, which will continue the philanthropic presence in and around Rome, New York.

Conditions to Completing the Merger

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s and Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s obligations to consummate the merger are conditioned on the following:

approval of the merger agreementMerger Agreement by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sBerkshire Hills’ stockholders;
receipt of all required regulatory approvals without any materially adverse conditions and the expiration of all statutory waiting periods;
no party to the mergerMerger being subject to any order, decree or injunction that enjoins or prohibits consummating the transaction, no governmental entity having instituted any proceeding to block the transaction and the absence of any statute, rule or regulation that prohibits completion of any part of the transaction;
the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus forms a part being declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the absence of any pending or threatened proceeding by the Securities and Exchange Commission to suspend the effectiveness of the registration statement and the receipt of all required state “blue sky” approvals;
receipt by each party of all consents and approvals from third parties (other than those required from government agencies) required to complete the merger,Merger, unless failure to obtain those consents or approvals would not have a material adverse effect on Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. after completion of the merger;Merger;
receipt by each party of opinions from their respective legal counsel to the effect that the mergerMerger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code;
no material adverse effect on either party has occurred;occurred, whether from Legacy, Berkshire Hills or a combination of the two, together with related branch premises and loans;
the other party having performed in all material respects its obligations under the merger agreement,Merger Agreement, the other party’s representations and warranties being true and correct as of the date of the merger agreementMerger Agreement and as of the closing date, and receipt of a certificate signed by the other party’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer to that effect; and
the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock issuable pursuant to the mergerMerger being approved for listing on The NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy cannot guarantee whetherthat all of the conditions to the mergerMerger will be satisfied or waived by the party permitted to do so.

Conduct of Business Before the Merger

Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy has agreed that, until completion of the mergerMerger and unless permitted by Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., neither it nor its subsidiaries will:

General Business

conduct its business other than in the usual, regular and ordinary course consistent with past practice;
take any action that would adversely affect or delay its ability to perform its obligations under the merger agreementMerger Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;

Capital Stock

adjust, split, combine or reclassify its capital stock;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

pay any cash or stock dividends or make any other distribution on its capital stock, except for regular quarterly cash dividends at a rate not exceeding $0.09$0.05 per share of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock and dividends paid by any of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s subsidiaries to enable Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy to pay such dividends;
issue any additional shares of capital stock or any securities or obligations convertible or exercisable for any shares of its capital stock, except pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

except in connection with the exercise of stock options or withholdings of taxes under any of the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stock-based incentive plans, redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock;

Dispositions

dispose of any of its material assets, incur any indebtedness, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, or waive or change any existing indebtedness;

Contracts

enter into, amend or terminate any contract or agreement, in excess of $10,000$100,000 except those specifically permitted by the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;
enter into, renew or modify any transaction with an affiliate (other than a deposit transaction);
enter into any hedging transaction other than for purposes of hedging interest rate exposure;
undertake or enter into any lease or other contract in excess of $25,000 annually, or containing a financial commitment extending 12 months from the date of the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;

Loans

make or acquire any loan or other credit facility, other than existing loan commitments or those in conformity with lending policies in effect as of the date of the merger agreement,Merger Agreement, in amounts not to exceed $500,000,$1,000,000, provided that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ consent shall be deemed granted if Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. does not object within three business days of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s written intent to make such loan;
sell any participation in a loan (excluding existing commitments);

Employees

increase the compensation or fringe benefits of any of its employees or directors, except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and pursuant to policies currently in effect;
grant or agree to pay any bonus, severance or termination to, or enter into, renew or amend any employment agreement, severance agreement and/or supplemental executive agreement with, or increase in any manner the compensation or fringe benefits of, any of its directors, officers, employees or consultants, except (i) as may be required pursuant to existing commitments, (ii) for salary adjustments in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice provided that any increases to such amounts shall not exceed four percent in the aggregate or (iii) as otherwise contemplated by the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;
become a party to, amend or commit to any benefit plan or employment agreement;
elect any new senior executive officer or director;
hire or promote employee to a rank having a title of vice president or other more senior rank or hire any employee with an annual total compensation in excess of $50,000;$75,000;

Settling Claims

settle any claim against it for more than $25,000 individually or $50,000 in the aggregate;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Governing Documents

amend its certificate of incorporation or bylaws;

Investment in Securities

purchase any securities except securities (i) rated “A” or higher by either Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or Moody’s Investors Service, (ii) having a face amount in the aggregate of not more than $250,000,$1.1 million, (iii) with a duration of not more than three (3)five (5) years and (iv) otherwise in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

Capital Expenditures

other than certain capital expenditures previously disclosed by Rome Bancorp, Inc.,Legacy, make any capital expenditures in excess of $25,000 individually, or $50,000 in the aggregate;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Branches

open or close any new branch or automated banking facility or file an application to do same;

Accounting

change its method of accounting, except as required by changes in generally accepted accounting principles or regulatory guidelines;

Merger Agreement

take any action that is intended or expected to result in any of its representations and warranties under the merger agreementMerger Agreement being or becoming untrue in any material respect or in the conditions to the mergerMerger not being satisfied or in a violation of a provision of the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;
knowingly take any action that would prevent or impede the mergerMerger from qualifying as a reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code;

Other Agreements

take any other action restricted under the merger agreement;Merger Agreement; or
agree to take, commit to take any or adopt any resolutions in support of any of the foregoing actions.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has agreed that, until the completion of the mergerMerger and unless permitted by Rome Bancorp, Inc.,Legacy, it will not:

change or waive any provision of its certificate of incorporation or bylaws;bylaws in any way adverse to the rights of Legacy shareholders;
take any action that would materially adversely affect or delay its ability to obtain regulatory approvals contemplated by the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;
take any action that is intended to materially adversely affect its ability to perform its covenants and agreements under the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;
take any action resulting in its representation and warranties not being true and correct at any future date on or prior to closing the merger;Merger;
knowingly take any action that would prevent or impede the mergerMerger from qualifying as a reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code; or
agree to take, commit to take or adopt any resolutions in support of any of the foregoing actions.

Covenants of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. in the Merger Agreement

Agreement Not to Solicit Other Proposals.  Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy and its officers, directors, employees and representatives have agreed not to: (1) solicit, initiate, or knowingly encourage any acquisition proposal by a third party; (2) participate in discussions or negotiations regarding an acquisition proposal; (3) enter into any agreement requiring it to abandon or terminate the merger agreementMerger Agreement with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.;


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hills; (4) make any public statement critical of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., its board of directors, its management or the merger;Merger; or (5) join with or assist any person or entity in opposing the merger.Merger. An acquisition proposal includes the following:

any merger,Merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, or other similar transaction involving Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy or its subsidiaries;
any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition of 25% or more of the assets of Rome Bancorp, Inc.;Legacy;
any tender offer or exchange offer for 25% or more of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Rome Bancorp, Inc.;Legacy; and
any public announcement of a proposal, plan or intention to do any of the foregoing or any agreement to engage in any of the foregoing.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Despite the agreement of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy not to solicit other acquisition proposals, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy may generally negotiate or have discussions with, or provide information to, a third party who makes an unsolicited, written, bona fide acquisition proposal, provided that the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy board of directors:

after consultation with its outside legal counsel and its financial advisor, determines in its good faith judgment that the transaction presented by such unsolicited acquisition proposal, after taking into account all legal, financial and regulatory aspects of the proposal, the person makingis reasonably likely to be consummated in accordance with its terms; and
determines in its good faith judgment that the proposal and the prospects and interests of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its stockholders, is reasonably likely to result in a more favorable transaction than the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and the acquisition proposal;
is not conditioned on obtaining financing;
is for all of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock; and
is, in the written opinion of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s financial advisor, more favorable to Rome Bancorp, Inc. stockholdersthe Legacy shareholders from a financial point of view thanthat the transactions contemplated by the merger agreementMerger Agreement with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and the acquisition proposal (a “superior proposal”).

If Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy receives a proposal or information request from a third party or enters into negotiations with a third party regarding a superior proposal, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy must immediately notify Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and provide Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. with information about the third party and its proposal.

Certain Other Covenants.  The merger agreementMerger Agreement also contains other agreements relating to the conduct of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy before consummation of the merger,Merger, including the following:

Rome Bancorp, Inc.each party will give Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.permit the other party reasonable access during normal business hours to its property, books, records and personnel and furnish all information the other party may reasonably request;
Rome Bancorp, Inc.each party will promptly provide Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.the other party with a copy of all documents filed with its banking regulators;
Rome Bancorp, Inc.each party will meet with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.the other party on a regular basis to discuss and plan for the conversion of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s data processing and related electronic information systems;
Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will invite atwo non-voting designeedesignees of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. to attend all regular and special board of directors or senior management committeeany meetings of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks loan and credit committees, except that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’s designeeHills’ designees will not attend portions of any meeting during which there is being discussed: (a) matters involving the merger;Merger; (b) information or material that Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks must keep confidential under applicable laws or regulations or policies or procedures of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy or Legacy Banks; or (c) any other matter that may violate or be inconsistent with a confidentiality obligation or fiduciary duty or any legal, regulatory or NASDAQ requirements;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Rome Savings Bank; or (c) pending or threatened litigation or investigations, if in the opinion of counsel to Rome Bancorp, Inc., the presence of such designee might adversely affect the confidential nature of or any privilege relating to matters being discussed;
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Berkshire Bank shall permit Patrick Sullivan to attend any meeting of the Berkshire Bank Loan Review Committee as an observer (the “Legacy Observer”), provided that neither Berkshire Hill nor Berkshire Bank will permit the Legacy Observer to remain present during any confidential discussion of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby or any unrelated acquisition proposal or during any other matter that the Board of Directors of Berkshire Bank has been advised by counsel that such attendance by the Legacy Observer may violate or be inconsistent with a confidentiality obligation or fiduciary duty or any legal, regulatory or NASDAQ requirement.
Berkshire Hills and Legacy will use their commercially reasonable efforts to submit all necessary applications, notices, and other filings with any governmental entity, the approval of which is required to complete the mergerMerger and related transactions;
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will use their reasonable best efforts to obtain all third party consents necessary to consummate the merger;
Rome Bancorp, Inc. will take any necessary action to exempt Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and this transaction from any anti-takeover provisions contained in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws or federal or state law;Merger;
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will use all reasonable efforts to take all actions necessary to consummate the mergerMerger and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will file a registration statement, of which this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus forms a part, with the Securities and Exchange Commission registering the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be issued in the mergerMerger to Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders;
Rome Bancorp, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

each party will take all actions necessary to convene a meeting of its respective stockholders to vote on the merger agreement.Merger Agreement. The Rome Bancorp, Inc. board of directors of each party will recommend at its respective stockholder meeting that the stockholders vote to approve the mergerMerger and will use its reasonable best efforts to solicit stockholder approval. However, the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy board of directors may fail to make such recommendation or change or withdrawalwithdraw its recommendation if: (1) Rome Bancorp, Inc. has properly called its meeting of stockholders; (2) has received a superior proposal; and (3) Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sif Legacy’s board of directors, after consultation with and based onconsideration of the advice of counsel,its financial and legal advisors, determines, in good faith, that making such a recommendation would result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law;
before completion of the merger,Merger, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will notify The NASDAQ Global Market of the additional shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will issue in exchange for shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock; and
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will notify each other of any material contract defaults and any events that would reasonably be likely to result in a material adverse effect on the other. They also will notify each other of any communication from a third party regarding the need to obtain that party’s consent in connection with the merger; and
each of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc. will coordinate with each other the payment of dividends to ensure that the holders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock and Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock will not receive two dividends, or fail to receive one dividend, for any single quarter.

Representations and Warranties Made by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy in the Merger Agreement

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy have made certain customary representations and warranties to each other in the merger agreementMerger Agreement relating to their businesses. For information on these representations and warranties, please refer to the merger agreementMerger Agreement attached as AnnexAppendix A. The representations and warranties must be true in all material respects through the completion of the mergerMerger unless the change does not have a material negative impact on the parties’ business, financial condition or results of operations. See— Conditions to Completing the Merger.

The representations and warranties contained in the merger agreementMerger Agreement were made only for purposes of such agreement and are made as of specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties to such agreement,


TABLE OF CONTENTS

and may be subject to limitations agreed to by the contracting parties, including being qualified by disclosures between the parties. These representations and warranties may have been made for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties to the agreement instead of establishing these matters as facts, and may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties that differ from those applicable to investors as statements of factual information.

Each of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy has made representations and warranties to the other regarding, among other things:

corporate matters, including due organization and qualification;
capitalization;
authority relative to execution and delivery of the merger agreementMerger Agreement and the absence of conflicts with, violations of, or a default under organizational documents or other obligations as a result of the mergerMerger or the bank merger;Merger;
governmental filings and consents necessary to complete the merger;Merger;
the timely filing of regulatory reports, the absence of investigations by regulatory agencies and internal controls;
financial statements;
tax matters;
employee matters and benefit plans;
real and personal property;
insurance matters;
environmental liabilities;
brokers or financial advisor fees;
the absence of events having, or reasonably likely to have, a material adverse effect;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

legal proceedings;
compliance with applicable laws;
the receipt of a fairness opinion from its financial advisor; and
absence of agreements with regulatory agencies restricting the conduct of its business.

In addition, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy has made other representations and warranties about itself to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. as to:

approval by its board of directors of the merger agreementMerger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;
the absence of any event or action that would constitute a material adverse effect since December 31, 2009;
matters relating to certain contracts;
the receipt of a fairness opinion from its financial advisor;
intellectual property;
loan matters and allowances for loan losses;
related party transactions;
deposits;
the absence of appraisal rights;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

trust business and fiduciary accounts; and
derivative instruments and transactions.

The representations and warranties of each of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will expire upon the effective time of the merger.Merger.

Terminating the Merger Agreement

The merger agreementMerger Agreement may be terminated at any time before the completion of the merger,Merger, either before or after approval of the merger agreementMerger Agreement by Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy or Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholders, as follows:

by the written mutual consent of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.;Legacy;
by either party, if the stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy fail to approve the merger agreementMerger Agreement (provided that Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will only be entitled to terminate for this reason if it has complied with its obligations under the merger agreementMerger Agreement with respect to its stockholder meeting);
by either party, if the stockholders of Berkshire Hills fail to approve the Merger Agreement (provided that Berkshire Hills will only be entitled to terminate for this reason if it has complied with its obligations under the Merger Agreement with respect to its stockholder meeting);
by either party, if a required regulatory approval, consent or waiver is denied or any governmental entity prohibits the consummation of the mergerMerger or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;Merger Agreement;
by either party, if the mergerMerger is not consummated by JuneNovember 30, 2011, unless failure to complete the mergerMerger by that time is due to a misrepresentation, breach of a warranty or failure to fulfill a covenant by the party seeking to terminate the agreement;
by either party, if the other party makes a misrepresentation, breaches a warranty or fails to fulfill a covenant that has not been or cannot be cured within 30 days following written notice to the party in default;
by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., if Rome Bancorp, Inc. materially breaches(a) Legacy has entered into an acquisition agreement with respect to a superior proposal and the Board of Directors of Legacy has withdrawn its agreements regardingrecommendation to approve the solicitation of other acquisition proposalsMerger, failed to make such recommendation or the submission of the merger agreement to stockholders,modified or if the board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. does not recommend approval of the merger in the proxy statement/prospectus or withdraws or revisesqualified its recommendation in a

TABLE OF CONTENTS

manner adverse to Berkshire Hills, (b) either (i) the Legacy Board of Directors submits the Merger Agreement to its shareholders without a recommendation for approval or (ii) the Legacy Board of Directors withdraws, qualifies or adversely modifies its recommendation to its shareholders, and (c) the Legacy shareholders do not approve the Merger Agreement;
by Legacy if (a) either the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.;Board of Directors submits the Merger Agreement to its shareholders without a recommendation for approval or (ii) the Berkshire Hills Board of Directors withdraws, qualifies or adversely modifies its recommendation its recommendation to its shareholders, and (b) the Berkshire Hills shareholders do not approve the Merger Agreement; or
by Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy if itLegacy has received a superior proposal and its boardthe Board of directorsDirectors of Legacy has made a determination to accept such superior proposal.proposal, and Berkshire Hills, after receiving notice of the superior proposal, has not, within three days of receipt of such notice, made adjustments to the terms of the Merger as would enable Legacy to proceed with the Merger.

Additionally, Legacy may terminate the Merger Agreement if, at any time during the five-day period commencing on the first date on which all bank regulatory approvals (and waivers, if applicable) necessary for consummation of the merger have been received (disregarding any waiting period) (the “Determination Date”), such termination to be effective if both of the following conditions are satisfied:

the number obtained by dividing the average of the daily closing prices of Berkshire Hills common stock for the ten consecutive trading days (the “BHLB Market Value”) immediately preceding the Determination Date is less than $16.70; and
the BHLB Market Value on the Determination Date by $20.88 is less than the number obtained by dividing (i) the sum of the average of the daily closing prices for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the Determination Date of a group of 18 financial institution holding companies (the “Final Index Price”) by (ii) the closing value of the above-referenced group of financial institution holding companies on the last trading date immediately preceding the public announcement of the entry into the merger agreement (the “Initial Index Price”), minus 0.20.

If Legacy elects to exercise its termination right as described above, it must give prompt written notice thereof to Berkshire Hills. During the five business day period commencing with its receipt of such notice, Berkshire Hills shall have the option to increase the consideration to be received by the holders of Legacy common stock by adjusting the exchange ratio to the following quotient at its sole discretion by dividing (i) $13.00 by the greater of (i) the product of 0.80 and $20.88 or (ii) the product obtained by multiplying the Index Ratio (the Final Index Price divided by the Initial Index Price) by $20.88. If within such five Business Day period, Berkshire Hills delivers written notice to Legacy that it intends to proceed with the Merger by paying such additional consideration as contemplated by the preceding sentence, then no termination shall have occurred and this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms (except that the exchange ratio shall have been so modified as described herein and, thereafter, any reference in the Merger Agreement to “Stock Consideration” shall be deemed to refer to the Stock Consideration reflecting the Exchange Ratio as modified herein).

Termination Fee

The merger agreementMerger Agreement requires Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy to pay Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. a fee of $3.5 million$4,320,000 if the merger agreementMerger Agreement is terminated in certain circumstances that involve a competing offer.

Specifically, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy must pay the termination fee if Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. terminates the merger agreementMerger Agreement as a result of a breach by Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy of its covenant regarding the solicitation of competing offers or its obligation to call a stockholder meeting or if Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s board of directors fails to recommend approval of the mergerMerger or upon the withdrawal, qualification or revision of its recommendation to approve the merger.Merger.

Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy also must (i) pay the termination fee if Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy terminates the merger agreementMerger Agreement as a result of accepting a superior proposal after allowing Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. an opportunity to make such adjustments in the merger agreementMerger Agreement to enable Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy to proceed with the mergerMerger on such adjusted terms or (ii) Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy enters


TABLE OF CONTENTS

into a definitive merger agreement within one year of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. terminating the merger agreementMerger Agreement due to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s break of a representation, warranty or covenant or failure of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s stockholders to approve the merger agreement.Merger Agreement.

Expenses

Each of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will pay its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with the merger. Rome Bancorp, Inc.Merger. Legacy also must: (i) pay the termination fee if Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy terminates the merger agreementMerger Agreement as a result of accepting a superior proposal after allowing


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. an opportunity to make such adjustments in the Merger Agreement to enable Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy to proceed with the mergerMerger on such adjusted terms or (ii) Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy enters into a definitive merger agreementMerger Agreement within one year of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. terminating the merger agreementMerger Agreement due to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s breach of a representation, warranty or covenant or failure of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s stockholders to approve the merger agreement.Merger Agreement.

Changing the Terms of the Merger Agreement

Before the completion of the merger,Merger, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy may agree to waive, amend or modify any provision of the merger agreement.Merger Agreement. However, after the vote by Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy can make no amendment or modification that would reduce the amount or alter the kind of consideration to be received by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s stockholders under the terms of the merger agreement.

Litigation Related to the Merger

Following the public announcement of the execution of the merger agreement between Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., on October 18, 2010, Stephen Bushansky filed a stockholder class action lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of the Bronx, on October 27, 2010, James and Liliana DiCastro filed a stockholder class action lawsuit in the Chancery Court of the State of Delaware, and on November 15, 2010, and Samuel S. Rapasodi filed a stockholder class action lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Oneida, each against Rome Bancorp, Inc., Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., and the directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. The lawsuit filed in Delaware was subsequently withdrawn voluntarily. The active lawsuits purport to be brought on behalf of all of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s public stockholders and allege that the directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc. breached their fiduciary duties to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stockholders by failing to take steps necessary to obtain a fair and adequate price for Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock and that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. knowingly aided and abetted Rome Bancorp, Inc. directors’ breach of fiduciary duty. The lawsuits seek to enjoin the proposed merger from proceeding and seek unspecified compensatory and/or rescissory damages on behalf of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stockholders. The lawsuits are in the preliminary stages. Both Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. believe that these lawsuits are meritless and intend to vigorously defend themselves against the allegations. Agreement.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION OF BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. CAPITAL STOCK

The following summary describes the material terms of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ capital stock and is subject to, and qualified by, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”). See“Where You Can Find More Information” as to how to obtain a copy of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

General

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. is currently authorized to issue 26,000,000 shares of common stock having a par value of $0.01 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock having a par value of $0.01 per share. At [Record Date], _________ shares of common stock were outstanding. At that date, no preferred shares were outstanding.

Common Stock

Voting Rights.  The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters presented to stockholders. Holders of common stock are not entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of directors. However, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation provides that a record owner of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ common stock who beneficially owns, either directly or indirectly, in excess of 10% of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ outstanding shares, is not entitled to any vote in respect of the shares held in excess of the 10% limit.

No Preemptive or Conversion Rights.  The holders of common stock do not have preemptive rights to subscribe for a proportionate share of any additional securities issued by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. before such securities are offered to others. The absence of preemptive rights increases Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ flexibility to issue additional shares of common stock in connection with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ acquisitions, employee benefit plans and for other purposes, without affording the holders of common stock a right to subscribe for their proportionate share of those additional securities. The holders of common stock are not entitled to any redemption privileges, sinking fund privileges or conversion rights.

Dividends.  Holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends ratably when, as and if declared by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ board of directors from assets legally available therefor, after payment of all dividends on preferred stock, if any is outstanding. Under Delaware law, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. may pay dividends out of surplus or net profits for the fiscal year in which declared and/or for the preceding fiscal year, even if its surplus accounts are in a deficit position. Dividends paid by Berkshire Bank and proceeds received from the offering of trust preferred securities have historically been the primary source of funds available to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Hills. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. expects to use these sources of funds in the future, as well as proceeds it may obtain from the offering of common stock, preferred stock and/or debt securities for payment of dividends to its stockholders, the repurchase of its common stock and for other needs. Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ board of directors intends to maintain its present policy of paying regular quarterly cash dividends. The declaration and amount of future dividends will depend on circumstances existing at the time, including Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, as well as regulatory limitations and such other factors as Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ board of directors deems relevant.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ principal assets and sources of income consist of investments in its operating subsidiaries, which are separate and distinct legal entities.

Liquidation.  Upon liquidation, dissolution or the winding up of the affairs of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., holders of common stock are entitled to receive their pro rata portion of the remaining assets of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. after the holders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ preferred stock, if any, have been paid in full any sums to which they may be entitled.

Preferred Stock

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation authorizes its board of directors, without stockholder action, to issue preferred stock in one or more series and to establish the designations, dividend rates and rights, dissolution or liquidation rights, preferences, price and terms and conditions on which shares may be redeemed, terms and conditions for conversion or exchange into any other class or series of the stock,


TABLE OF CONTENTS

voting rights and other terms. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible


TABLE OF CONTENTS

acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ control.

Certain Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaw Provisions Affecting Stock

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain several provisions that may make Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. a less attractive target for an acquisition of control by anyone who does not have the support of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ board of directors. Such provisions include, among other things, the requirement of a supermajority vote of stockholders or directors to approve certain business combinations and other corporate actions, a minimum price provision, several special procedural rules, a staggered board of directors, a vote limitation provision and the limitation that stockholder actions may only be taken at a meeting and may not be taken by unanimous written stockholder consent. The foregoing is qualified in its entirely by reference to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

Restrictions on Ownership

Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Office of Thrift Supervision if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire “control” of a savings and loan holding company or savings association. An acquisition of “control” can occur upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the voting stock of a savings and loan holding company or savings institution or as otherwise defined by the Office of Thrift Supervision. Under the Change in Bank Control Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that so acquires control would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The Transfer Agent and Registrar for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ common stock is Registrar and Transfer Company, 10 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS

The rights of stockholders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. are currently governed by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation, bylaws and applicable provisions of the DGCL. The rights of stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy are currently governed by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s certificate of incorporation, bylaws and applicable provisions of the DGCL. If the mergerMerger is completed, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders who receive Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock will become Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholders and their rights will likewise be governed by Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the DGCL.

The following is a summary of the material differences between the rights of a Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholder and the rights of a Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholder. This summary is not a complete statement of the differences between the rights of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders and the rights of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. stockholders and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the governing law of each corporation and to the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of each corporation. Copies of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation and bylaws are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation and bylaws are available upon written request addressed to Corporate Secretary, Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., 24 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201.

 
Authorized Stock
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

The Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. certificate of incorporation authorizes 27,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of 26,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value.

 

•  

The Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy certificate of incorporation authorizes 30,000,00050,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of 40,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value.

•  

At [Record Date], there were ________ shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock issued and outstanding.

 

•  

As ofAt [Record Date], there were ______ shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy common stock issued and outstanding.

•  

As of [Record Date], there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

 

•  

As of [Record Date], there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

 
Voting Rights
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

The holders of the common stock exclusively possess all voting power, subject to the authority of the board of directors to offer voting rights to the holders of preferred stock.

 

•  

The holders of the common stock exclusively possess all voting power, subject to the authority of the board of directors to offer voting rights to the holders of preferred stock.

•  

Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. Beneficial owners of 10% or more of the outstanding stock are subject to voting limitations.

 

•  

Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. Beneficial owners of 10% or more of the outstanding stock are subject to voting limitations.

•  

Holders of common stock may not cumulate their votes for the election of directors.

 

•  

Holders of common stock may not cumulate their votes for the election of directors.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Required Vote for Authorization of Certain Actions
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

At least 80% of the outstanding shares of voting stock must approve certain “business combinations” involving an “interested stockholder” or any affiliate of an “interested

•  

At least 80% of the outstanding shares of voting stock must approve certain “business combinations” involving any “other corporation” or any affiliate of any “other


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Required Vote for Authorization of Certain Actions
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.Rome Bancorp, Inc.

stockholder.” However, if a majority of directors not affiliated with the interested stockholder approves the business combination or certain pricing criteria are satisfied, a majority vote of the outstanding shares is sufficient to approve a business combination.

 

  

corporation.At least 80% of the outstanding shares of voting stock must approve certain “business combinations” involving an “interested stockholder” or any affiliate of an “interested stockholder.” However, if a majority of directors not affiliated with the other corporationinterested stockholder approves the business combination or certain pricing criteria are satisfied, a majority vote of the outstanding shares is sufficient to approve a business combination.

 
Dividends
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

Holders of common stock are entitled, when declared by the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Board, to receive dividends, subject to the rights of holders of preferred stock.

 

•  

Holders of common stock are entitled, when declared by the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy Board, to receive dividends, subject to the rights of holders of preferred stock.

 
Stockholders’ Meetings
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. must deliver notice of the meeting and, in the case of a special meeting, a description of its purpose no fewer than ten days and no more than 60 days before the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote.

 

•  

Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy must deliver notice of the meeting and, in the case of a special meeting, a description of its purpose no fewer than ten days and no more than 60 days before the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote.

•  

Special meetings may be called only by the board of directors.

 

•  

Special meetings may be called only by the board of directors.

•  

For purposes of determining stockholders entitled to vote at a meeting, the board of directors may fix a record date that is not less than ten days and not more than 60 days before the meeting.

 

•  

For purposes of determining stockholders entitled to vote at a meeting, the board of directors may fix a record date that is not less than ten days and not more than 60 days before the meeting.

•  

The board of directors or any stockholder entitled to vote may nominate directors for election or propose new business.

 

•  

The board of directors or any stockholder entitled to vote may nominate directors for election or propose new business.

To nominate a director or propose new business, stockholders must give written notice to the Secretary of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. not less than 90 days before the meeting. However, if Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. gives less than 100 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the meeting, written notice of the stockholder proposal or nomination must be delivered to the Secretary not later than ten days following the date notice of the meeting was mailed to stockholders or public disclosure of the meeting was made. Each notice given by a stockholder with respect to a nomination to the board of directors or proposal for new business must include certain information regarding the nominee or proposal and the stockholder making the nomination or proposal.

 

•  

To nominate a director or propose new business, stockholders must give written notice to the Secretary of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy not less than 90 days before the anniversary datemeeting. However, if Legacy gives less than 100 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the immediately preceding annual meeting, of stockholders. However, if Rome Bancorp, Inc. holds the annual meeting for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, written notice of the stockholder proposal or nomination must be delivered to the Secretary not later than ten days following the date notice of the meeting was mailed to stockholders.stockholders or public disclosure of the meeting was made. Each notice given by a stockholder with respect to a nomination to the board of directors or proposal for new business must include certain information regarding the nominee or proposal and the stockholder making the nomination or proposal.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Action by Stockholders Without a Meeting
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

Action taken at an annual or special meeting of stockholders must be effected at a duly called meeting and may not be effected by written consent of stockholders.

 

•  

Action taken at an annual or special meeting of stockholders must be effected at a duly called meeting and may not be effected by written consent of stockholders.

 
Board of Directors
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

The bylaws provide that the number of directors, to be fixed by resolution, shall not exceed 12.

 

•  

The bylaws provide that the number of directors to be fixed by a resolution, shall be no less than sevendesignated by the Board of Directors, and no more than 20.in the absence of such designation, shall be nine.

•  

The board of directors is divided into three classes as equal in number as possible and approximately one-third of the directors are elected at each annual meeting.

 

•  

The board of directors is divided into three classes as equal in number as possible and approximately one-third of the directors are elected at each annual meeting.

•  

Vacancies on the board of directors will be filled by a vote of a majority of the remaining directors.

 

•  

Vacancies on the board of directors will be filled by a vote of a majority vote of the remaining directors.

•  

Directors may be removed only for cause by the vote of 80% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at an annual or special meeting called for that purpose.

 

•  

Directors may be removed at any time, but only for cause by the vote of 80% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at an annual or special meeting called for that purpose.vote.

 
Amendment of the Bylaws
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

The bylaws may be amended or repealed by either the approval of a majority of the board of directors or by the vote of 80% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

 

•  

The bylaws may be amended or repealed by either the approval of two-thirdsa majority of the board of directors or by the vote of two-thirds80% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

 
Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.

•  

The certificate of incorporation may be amended or repealed upon approval of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the matter, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation or Delaware law.

 

•  

The certificate of incorporation generally may be amended or repealed upon approval of the board of directors and a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the matter, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation or Delaware law. The certificate of incorporation provides that certain sections may be amended or repealed only by the vote of 80% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS AFTER THE MERGER

Board of Directors

After completion of the merger,Merger, the boardboards of directors of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Berkshire Bank will be increased by two members and will consist of all the current directors of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and two directors of Legacy, one of whom will be J. Williar Dunlaevy and the other a current director of Legacy designated by Berkshire Hills. Lawrence A. Bossidy will continue to be Non-Executive Chairman of the Board.

Information regarding the current directors and executive officers of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., executive compensation and relationships and related transactions is included in this Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ proxy statement for its 20102011 annual meeting of stockholders, which is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus.Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

Management

TheAfter completion of the Merger, the executive officers of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Bank will not change as a resultconsist of the merger.current executive officers plus Patrick J. Sullivan, the current President of Legacy.

Operations

While there can be no assurance as to the achievement of business and financial goals, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. currently expects to achieve cost savings equal to approximately 35%% of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s current annualized non-interest expenses through the elimination of redundant senior management and back-office staffing and other operating efficiencies (such as the elimination of duplicative data processing services). Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. expects to achieve most of these savings in the first full year following the merger.Merger. See “Caution About Forward-Looking Statements.”


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INFORMATION ABOUT ROMEBERKSHIRE HILLS PROPOSAL II — AMENDMENT OF
THE BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO
INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

Berkshire Hills’ Board has adopted a resolution declaring advisable an amendment to the Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 26 million shares to 50 million shares (and correspondingly, increase the total number of authorized shares of all classes of stock from 27 million to 51 million, which includes one million authorized shares of preferred stock). No change is being proposed to the authorized number of shares of our preferred stock.

GeneralReasons for Amendment

Rome Bancorp, Inc.Our Certificate of Incorporation currently provides for 26 million shares of authorized Common Stock, of which shares were issued and outstanding at the close of business on the Record Date. Upon closing of the merger with Legacy, we expect to issue approximately million shares of our Common Stock. Our Board believes that the number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock is a Delaware corporation organized on June 9, 1999not adequate to enable us, as the stock holding company for The Rome Savings Bank, a federally chartered stock savings bank headquartered in Rome, New York. Rome Bancorp, Inc., Inc.’s principal business is to hold the capital stock of The Rome Savings Bank.

The Rome Savings Bank is a federal stock savings bank and the wholly-owned subsidiary of Rome Bancorp, Inc. The Rome Savings Bank is a community and customer-oriented retail savings bank that offers traditional deposit products, residential real estate mortgage loans and consumer, commercial and commercial real estate loans. In addition, The Rome Savings Bank purchases securities issued by the U.S. Government and government agencies, municipal securities, mortgage-backed securities and other investments permitted by applicable laws and regulations.

Business Strategy

Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s business is to hold The Rome Savings Bank. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s revenues are derived principally from interest on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loans and interest and dividends on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s investment securities. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s primary sources of funds are deposits, payments of loan principal and mortgage-backed securities, maturities and calls of investment securities, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, and funds provided by operations.

Market Area

Operations are conducted out of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s executive office in Rome, New York and four branch offices located in Oneida County, New York, two of which are located in Rome, one in New Hartford, New York and one in Lee, New York. As of June 30, 2010, The Rome Savings Bank maintained a 7.34% share of all Oneida County, New York deposits, ranking sixth in size of deposits in Oneida County. The Rome Savings Bank also maintained a 40.95% market share of all reported funds on deposit in the City of Rome as of June 30, 2010, making it the largest depository institution in Rome.

Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s geographic market area for loans and deposits is principally Oneida County, New York. The local economy is not dependent on one key employer. The principal employment sectors are service-related (excluding financial industries), wholesale and retail trade, and manufacturing.

Similar to national trends, in recent years most of the job growth realized in Oneida County has been in service related industries, and service jobs now account for the largest portion of the workforce. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s market area also includes a growing number of healthcare, engineering, software, and technical firms that have located in Oneida County in orderneed may arise, to take advantage of its well-educated work force, including current and former military and defense industry personnel. Rome, New York is located 15 miles west of Utica and approximately 45 miles east of Syracuse. Depending on market conditions we also occasionally originate loansand favorable opportunities involving the issuance of our Common Stock without the delay and expense associated with the holding of a special meeting of our stockholders. The availability of additional authorized shares will provide us with the flexibility in the greater New York City metropolitan area, typically through loan participations,future to issue shares of our Common Stock for corporate purposes such as acquisitions, raising additional capital, paying dividends or stock or effecting stock splits, providing equity incentives to employees, officers and outsidedirectors, and other general corporate purposes. We do not have any current intention or plan to issue shares of New York State.

Competition

Common Stock for any such purpose, other than in connection with the Legacy merger, which shares have already been reserved for issuance and are available under our presently authorized common stock, and the grant of stock awards and exercise of stock options. The Rome Savings Bank faces intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. New York has a high concentration of financial institutions, many of which are branches of large money center and regional banks which have resulted from the consolidationapproval by Berkshire Hills shareholders of the banking industry in New York and surrounding states. Someamendment to the Certificate of these competitors have greater resources than we do and may offer services that we doIncorporation is not provide. For example, The Rome Savings Bank doesconditioned on the outcome of the stockholder vote for the proposed merger with Legacy. Similarly, the proposed merger with Legacy is not provide trust or investment services, or credit cards. Customers who seek “one-stop shopping”conditioned on Berkshire Hills stockholder approval to amend the Certificate of Incorporation.

Effect on Outstanding Common Stock

Authorized but unissued shares of our Common Stock may be drawnissued from time to these institutions.

Competitiontime upon authorization by our Board, at such times, to such persons and for loans comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms, credit unions, finance companies, insurance companies,such consideration as the Board may determine in its discretion and brokeragegenerally without further approval by stockholders, except as may be required for a particular transaction by applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rules. When and investment banking firms. The most direct competition for deposits has historically come from credit unions, commercial banks, savings banks,if such shares are issued, they would have the same voting and savingsother rights and loan associations. The Rome Savings Bank faces additional competition for deposits from short-term money market funds, corporateprivileges as the currently issued and government securities funds, and from brokerage firms, mutual funds, and insurance companies.outstanding shares of Common Stock.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lending Activities

The Rome Savings Bank has a long-standing commitment to originate commercial real estate, commercial and consumer loans, in addition to a traditional emphasis on residential lending. We retain the majorityauthorization of the loans that we originate. Currently, we are selling mostadditional shares would not, by itself, have any effect on the rights of stockholders. However, holders of our Common Stock have no preemptive rights to acquire additional shares of our Common Stock and thus the issuance of additional shares of Common Stock for corporate purposes other than a stock split or stock dividend would have a dilutive effect on the ownership and voting rights of the longer term residential mortgage loans we originate intostockholders at the secondary market. At September 30, 2010, The Rome Savings Bank had total loanstime of $277.8 million,issuance.

Increasing the number of which $152.2 million,authorized shares of Common Stock could adversely affect the ability of third parties to take over or 54.8%, were one- to four-family residential mortgages and residential construction loans. Of residential mortgage loans outstanding atchange the control of Berkshire Hills. It is possible that date, 20.3% were adjustable-rate mortgage loans and 79.7% were fixed-rate loans. The remainder of The Rome Savings Bank’ loans at September 30, 2010, amounting to $125.6 million,an increase in authorized shares could render such an acquisition more difficult under certain circumstances or 45.2% of total loans, consisted of commercial real estate, commercial loans, and consumer loans. The Rome Savings Bank originates commercial real estate and commercial business loans both within and outside of Oneida County, New York. As of September 30, 2010, 18.1% of The Rome Savings Bank’ loan portfolio was in commercial real estate loans and 12.1% was in commercial loans. In addition, as of September 30, 2010, 15.0% of The Rome Savings Bank’ loan portfolio was in consumer loans. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loans are subject to federal and state laws and regulations. The interest rates charged on loans are affected principallydiscourage an attempt by the demand for loans, the supply of money available for lending purposes and the interest rates offered by Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s competitors. These factors are, in turn, affected by general and local economic conditions, monetary policies of the federal government, including the Federal Reserve Board, legislative tax policies and governmental budgetary matters.

Subsidiary Activities

The Rome Savings Bank has four subsidiaries: 100 On the Mall Corporation, Clocktower Insurance Agency Incorporated, RSB Properties, Inc. and RSB Capital Inc. 100 On the Mall acts as a manager, and developer of real estate. Its only activity is ownership of The Rome Savings Bank’ main office building and premises. Clocktower Insurance owns real estate for future expansion, which until January of 2010 had been leased to a Dunkin Donuts franchise adjacent to one of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s branch offices. This property was sold to a third party in January 2010. RSB Properties, Inc.to obtain control of us by making possible the issuance of shares that would dilute the share ownership of a person attempting to obtain control or otherwise make it difficult to obtain any required stockholder approval for a proposed transaction for control. However, the Board is a real estate investment trust. RSB Capital, Inc. is currently inactive.

Employees

At September 30, 2010, The Rome Savings Bank had 94 full-time employeesnot aware of any attempts to take control of Berkshire Hills and 4 part-time employees. The Rome Savings Bank employees arehas not represented by a collective bargaining agreement, and The Rome Savings Bank considers its relationship with its employees to be good.

Regulation and Supervision

Rome Bancorp, Inc. is regulated as a savings and loan holding company by the Office of Thrift Supervision. The Rome Savings Bank, as a federally-chartered savings bank, is subject to regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision, as its primary regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as its deposit insurer. The Rome Savings Bank must file reportspresented this Proposal II with the Office of Thrift Supervision concerning its activities and financial condition. Rome Bancorp, Inc. is also required to file reports with, and otherwise comply with, the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision and of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.

Regulation of Federal Savings Associations

Business Activities.  The Rome Savings Bank derives its lending and investment powers from the Home Owners’ Loan Act,intent that it be utilized as amended (the “HOLA”), and the Office of Thrift Supervision regulations. Under these laws and regulations, The Rome Savings Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by residential and commercial real estate, commercial and consumer loans, certain types of debt securities, and certain other assets. The Rome Savings Bank may also establish service corporations that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for The Rome Savings Bank, including certain real estate equity investments and securities and brokerage activities. The Rome Savings Bank’ authority to make certain types of loans or other investments is limited by federal law and regulation.an anti-takeover device.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QTL Test.  Under federal law, The Rome Savings Bank must comply with the qualified thrift lender, or the “QTL” test. Under the QTL test, The Rome Savings Bank is required to maintain at least 65%text of its “portfolio assets” in certain “qualified thrift investments” in at least nine months of the most recent 12-month period. The Rome Savings Bank met the QTL test at September 30, 2010, and in each of the prior 12 months, and therefore is a “qualified thrift lender.” If The Rome Savings Bank fails the QTL test, and is unable to correct that failure for a period of time, it must either operate under certain restrictions on its activities or convert to a bank charter.

Capital Requirements.  The Office of Thrift Supervision regulations require savings associations to meet three minimum capital standards: a tangible capital ratio requirement of 1.5% of total assetsArticle Fourth A, as adjusted under the Office of Thrift Supervision regulations; a leverage ratio requirement of 3.0% of core capital to such adjusted total assets, if a savings association has been assigned the highest composite rating of 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System; and a total risk-based capital ratio requirement of 8.0% of core and supplementary capital to total risk-based assets, provided that the amount of supplementary capital used to satisfy this requirement shall not exceed the amount of core capital. The minimum leverage capital ratio for any other depository institution that does not have a composite rating of 1 will be 4.0%, unless a higher leverage capital ratio is warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profile of the depository institution. At September 30, 2010, The Rome Savings Bank met each of these minimum capital standards and was considered “well-capitalized.”

Enforcement.  The Office of Thrift Supervision has primary enforcement responsibility over federally chartered savings associations, including The Rome Savings Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist orders and to remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and to unsafe or unsound practices.

Standards for Safety and Soundness.  Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision has adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards. These guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings standards, compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, the Office of Thrift Supervision to order a savings association that has been given notice that it is not satisfying these safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If, after being notified, a savings association fails to submit an acceptable plan or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted plan, the Office of Thrift Supervision must issue an order directing action to correct the deficiency. Further, the Office of Thrift Supervision may issue an order directing corrective actions and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an undercapitalized association is subject under the “prompt corrective action” provisions of federal law. If a savings association fails to comply with such an order, the Office of Thrift Supervision may seek to enforce such order in judicial proceedings and to impose civil money penalties.

Liquidity.  The Rome Savings Bank is required to maintain a sufficient amount of liquid assets to ensure its safe and sound operation.

Prompt Corrective Action Regulations.  Under the Office of Thrift Supervision prompt corrective action regulations, the Office of Thrift Supervision is required to take certain, and is authorized to take other, supervisory actions against undercapitalized savings associations. For this purpose, a savings association is placed in one of the following four categories based on the association’s capital: well capitalized; adequately capitalized; undercapitalized; or critically undercapitalized. At September 30, 2010, The Rome Savings Bank met the criteria for being considered “well-capitalized.” When appropriate, the Office of Thrift Supervision can require corrective action by a savings association holding company under the “prompt corrective action” provision of federal law.

Insurance of Deposit Accounts.  The Rome Savings Bank is a member of the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) maintained by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and The Rome Savings Bank pays its deposit insurance assessments to the DIF in accordance with the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of


TABLE OF CONTENTS

2005 (“DIF Act”). The DIF Act established a statutory minimum and maximum designated reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund and granted the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation greater flexibility in establishing the required reserve ratio. In its regulations implementing the DIF Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation had previously set the annual designated reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund at 1.25%. However, as a result of the recent failures of a number of banks and thrifts, there has been a significant increase in the loss provisions of the DIF of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This increase has resulted in a decline in the DIF reserve ratio. Because the DIF reserve ratio declined, and for the foreseeable future is expected to remain, below 1.15%, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation established a restoration plan to restore the DIF reserve ration to 1.15% within five years. On September 29, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted an amendment to the restoration plan that increases the deposit insurance assessment rate schedule uniformly across all four risk categories by three basis points (annualized) of insured deposits beginning January 1, 2011. In addition, on November 17, 2009 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted a final rule which required insured depository institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The prepaid assessment for these periods was collected on December 30, 2009 and The Rome Savings Bank’ prepaid assessment was $752,000 which was recorded as a prepaid expense.

Federal Reserve System.  Under regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, The Rome Savings Bank is required to maintain noninterest-earning reserves against its transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). The Federal Reserve Board regulations exempt $10.7 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustment by the Federal Reserve Board) from the reserve requirements. A 3% reserve is required for net transaction account balances between $10.7 million and $55.2 million (subject to adjustment by the Federal Reserve Board) plus a reserve requirement 10% (subject to adjustment by the Federal Reserve Board between 8% and 14%) against that portion of total transaction accounts in excess of $55.2 million. The Rome Savings Bank is in compliance with the foregoing reserve requirements. Because required reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash, a noninterest-bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank, or a pass-through account as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, the effect of this reserve requirement is to reduce the Bank’s interest-earning assets. The balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve Board may be used to satisfy liquidity requirements imposed by the Office of Thrift Supervision. Federal Home Loan Bank System members are also authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve discount window, but Federal Reserve Board regulations require such institutions to exhaust all Federal Home Loan Bank sources before borrowing from a Federal Reserve Bank.

The Bank Secrecy Act.  The Rome Savings Bank and Rome Bancorp, Inc. are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act, which gives the federal government powers to address money laundering and terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers, and mandatory transaction reporting obligations. By way of example, the Bank Secrecy Act imposes an affirmative obligation on The Rome Savings Bank to report currency transactions that exceed certain thresholds and to report other transactions determinedproposed to be suspicious.

On July 26, 2010,amended, is set forth as Appendix E to this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The Rome Savings Bank stipulated and consented to a Cease and Desist Order (the “Order”) issued by the Office of Thrift Supervision. The Order became effective on July 26, 2010. The Order was issued as a result of weaknesses in The Rome Savings Bank’s Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (“BSA”) compliance program identified this year. The Order requires The Rome Savings Bank to cease and desist from violating certain BSA laws and regulation identified in the Order, revise its current BSA compliance program, implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with BSA laws and regulations and to take certain other actions identified by the Office of Thrift Supervision in the Order. The Rome Savings Bank has addressed many of the matters mentioned in the Order and expects to complete all of the actions required to be taken by the deadline dates stated in the Order. The Order will not have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of The Rome Savings Bank or Rome Bancorp, Inc.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Regulation of Savings and Loan Holding Companies

Rome Bancorp, Inc. is a savings and loan holding company regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision. As such, Rome Bancorp, Inc. is registered with and subject to Office of Thrift Supervision examination and supervision, as well as certain reporting requirements. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has enforcement authority over Rome Bancorp, Inc. and any of its non-savings association subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the Office of Thrift Supervision to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stabilityaffirmative vote of a subsidiary savings association. Unlike bank holding companies, federal savings and loan holding companies are not subject to any regulatory capital requirements or to supervision by the Federal Reserve Board.

In general, a SLHC, with the prior approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision, may engage in all activities that bank holding companies may engage in under any regulation that the Federal Reserve Board has promulgated under Section 4(c) of the BHC Act. Current regulations limit such authority to those activities that the Federal Reserve Board has, by regulation, determined to be permissible under Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act, as noted below. Prior approval from the Office of Thrift Supervision is not required, however, if: (1) the SLHC received a rating of satisfactory or above prior to January 1, 2008, or a composite rating of “1” or “2” thereafter, in its most recent examination, and its not in troubled condition, and the holding company does not propose to commence the activity by an acquisition of a going concern, or (2) the activity is otherwise permissible under another provision of HOLA, for which prior notice to or approval from the Office of Thrift Supervision is not required.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

The Rome Savings Bank’s results of operations depend primarily on its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income it earns on its loans and investments and the interest it pays on its deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on these balances. The Rome Savings Bank’s operations are also affected by non-interest income, such as service fees and gains and losses on sales of securities, the provision for loan losses and non-interest expense such as salaries and employee benefits, occupancy costs, and other general and administrative expenses. Financial institutions in general, including The Rome Savings Bank, are significantly affected by economic conditions, competition and the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for and supply of housing, competition among lenders, interest rate conditions and availability of funds. The Rome Savings Bank’s operations and lending are principally concentrated in the Central New York area, therefore its operations and earnings are influenced by the economics of such area. Deposit balances and cost of funds are influenced by prevailing market rates on competing investments, customer preferences and levels of personal income and savings in The Rome Savings Bank’s primary market area.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions. Changes in these estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Different amounts could be reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions were used in the application of these accounting policies.

It is management’s opinion that accounting estimates covering certain aspects of the business have more significance than others due to the relative importance of those areas to overall performance, or the level of subjectivity required in making these estimates. Management of Rome Bancorp, Inc. considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance for loan losses to be a critical accounting policy given the uncertainty in evaluating the level of the allowance required for probable credit losses and the material effect that such judgments can have on the results of operations. Management’s quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance considers Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s historical loan loss experience, review of specific loans, current economic conditions and such other factors considered appropriate to estimate losses. Management uses presently available information to estimate probable losses on loans; however, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in estimates, assumptions or economic conditions. Significant factors that could give rise to changes in these estimates include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions in the local area, concentrations of risk and declines of local property values.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s critical policies and their application are reviewed periodically by the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. All accounting policies are important, and as such, Rome Bancorp, Inc. encourages the reader to review each of the policies included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements reported on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K to obtain a better understanding of how its financial performance is reported.

General

Net income for the third quarter of 2010 decreased to $838,000, from the prior year’s third quarter net income of $908,000. The significant factors and trends impacting the third quarter of 2010, which are discussed in greater depth below, were as follows:

Net interest income before loan loss provision increased by $179,000, or 5.5%, from the same quarter last year principally due to a decrease in interest expense stemming from decreases in the rates paid on deposits and borrowings, as well as a decrease in average outstanding borrowings.
Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded a $75,000 provision for loan losses in the third quarter of 2010 versus no provision for loan losses in the third quarter of 2009.
Other non-interest income increased by $143,000, or 21.5%, from the third quarter 2009 levels primarily due to increased gains on sales of residential loan originations into the secondary market.
Non-interest expense increased by $453,000 to $3.0 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2010 from $2.6 million for the same period of 2009 primarily due to an increase in professional fees.
Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2010 decreased to $324,000 compared to $460,000 in the third quarter of 2009, primarily due to lower pre-tax income and a reduction in New York State income taxes payable due to amendments in New York State taxation statutes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Analysis of Net Interest Income: September 30, 2010

Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields.  The following table sets forth certain information relating to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s average balance sheets and reflects the average yield on interest-earnings assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, interest earned and interest paid for the periods indicated. Such yields and costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Average balances are derived from daily balances over the periods indicated. The average balances for loans are net of allowance for loan losses, but include non-accrual loans. Interest income on securities includes a tax equivalent adjustment for bank qualified municipals.

      
 Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields
   For the three months ended
September 30, 2010
 For the three months ended
September 30, 2009
   Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/
Cost
 Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/
Cost
   (Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
                              
Interest-earning assets:
                              
Loans $274,143  $4,007   5.80 $283,982  $4,148   5.80
Securities(1)  17,408   179   4.08   12,689   159   4.98 
Federal funds sold & other interest bearing deposits  6,913   3   0.16   11,106   4   0.13 
Total interest-earnings assets  298,464   4,189   5.57   307,777   4,311   5.56 
Noninterest-earning assets  28,501             27,334           
Total assets $326,965            $335,111           
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
                              
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                              
Savings accounts $85,498  $86   0.40  $83,681  $84   0.40 
Time deposits  70,075   304   1.71   72,203   440   2.41 
Money market accounts  18,966   48   1.01   15,863   47   1.18 
Other interest bearing deposits  16,714   16   0.39   14,642   15   0.42 
Total interest-bearing deposits  191,253   454   0.94   186,389   586   1.25 
Borrowings  37,563   299   3.16   55,081   466   3.35 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  228,816   753   1.31   241,470   1,052   1.73 
Noninterest-bearing deposits  34,685             30,059           
Other liabilities  3,922             5,266           
Total liabilities  267,423             276,795           
Stockholders’ equity  59,542             58,316           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $326,965            $335,111           
Net interest income       3,436             3,259      
Tax equivalent adjustment on securities                    (2     
Net interest income per consolidated financial statements      $3,436            $3,257      
Net interest rate spread            4.26            3.83
Net interest margin            4.57            4.20
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities            1.30x             1.27x 

(1)Includes tax equivalent adjustment for Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s tax-exempt municipal securities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

      
 Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields
   For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010
 For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009
   Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/
Cost
 Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/
Cost
   (Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
                              
Interest-earning assets:
                              
Loans $281,644  $12,125   5.76 $290,652  $12,626   5.81
Securities(1)  15,704   513   4.37   10,457   372   4.76 
Federal funds sold & other interest bearing deposits  2,799   3   0.15   6,711   8   0.17 
Total interest-earnings assets  300,147   12,641   5.63   307,820   13,006   5.65 
Noninterest-earning assets  27,967             27,601           
Total assets $328,114            $335,421           
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
                              
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                              
Savings accounts $84,610  $253   0.40  $82,411  $247   0.40 
Time deposits  71,143   967   1.82   72,424   1,464   2.70 
Money market accounts  17,649   134   1.01   14,886   147   1.32 
Other interest bearing deposits  15,362   44   0.38   13,970   42   0.40 
Total interest-bearing deposits  188,764   1,398   0.99   183,691   1,900   1.38 
Borrowings  39,782   902   3.03   56,321   1,359   3.23 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  228,546   2,300   1.35   240,012   3,259   1.82 
Noninterest-bearing deposits  33,127             29,876           
Other liabilities  6,493             6,639           
Total liabilities  268,166             276,527           
Stockholders’ equity  59,948             58,894           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $328,114            $335,421           
Net interest income       10,341             9,747      
Tax equivalent adjustment on securities       (4            (10     
Net interest income per consolidated financial statements      $10,337            $9,737      
Net interest rate spread            4.28            3.83
Net interest margin            4.61            4.23
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities            1.31x             1.28x 

(1)Includes tax equivalent adjustment for Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s tax-exempt municipal securities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rate Volume Analysis.  The following table analyzes the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It shows the amount of the change in interest income or expense caused by either changes in outstanding balances (volume) or changes in interest rates. The effect of a change in volume is measured by applying the average rate during the first period to the volume change between the two periods. The effect of changes in rate is measured by applying the change in rate between the two periods to the average volume during the first period. Changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the absolute value of the change due to volume and the change due to rate.

      
 Three months ended September 30, 2009 Nine months ended
September 30, 2009
   Increases (decreases) due to Increases (decreases) due to
   Rate Volume Net Rate Volume Net
   (in thousands)
Assets:
                              
Interest-earning assets:
                              
Loans $(1 $(140 $(141 $(116 $(385 $(501
Securities(1)  (39  59   20   (46  187   141 
Federal funds sold & other
                              
Interest bearing deposits     (1  (1     (5  (5
Total interest-earnings assets  (40  (82  (122  (162  (203  (365
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                              
Savings accounts     2   2   (1  7   6 
Time deposits  (123  (13  (136  (471  (26  (497
Money market accounts  (8  9   1   (40  27   (13
Other interest bearing deposits  (1  2   1   (2  4   2 
Total interest-bearing deposits  (132     (132  (514  12   (502
Borrowings  (19  (148  (167  (58  (399  (457
Total interest-bearing liabilities  (151  (148  (299  (572  (387  (959
Net change(1) $111  $66  $177  $410  $184  $594 

(1)Includes tax equivalent adjustment for Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s tax-exempt municipal securities.

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

Total assets of Rome Bancorp, Inc. at September 30, 2010 increased to $331.6 million compared to $329.9 million at December 31, 2009. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s net loan portfolio decreased by $10.4 million, or 3.6%, from $285.6 million at December 31, 2009 to $275.2 million at September 30, 2010. During the first nine months of 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. originated approximately $40.8 million of loans, compared to approximately $39.9 million of loans originated in the same period of 2009.

Total deposits increased to $226.9 million at September 30, 2010 from $216.6 million at December 31, 2009. During the first three quarters of 2010, savings deposits increased by $3.4 million, or 4.1%, and money market balances increased by $4.2 million, or 26.8%. Time deposits decreased by $2.3 million, or 3.1%, to $69.6 million at September 30, 2010 from $71.9 million at year end 2009. Balances of non-interest bearing deposits increased by $4.7 million, or 14.8%, while other interest bearing deposits increased by $209,000, or 1.4%, over the first nine months of 2010.

As a result of increased loan sale activity and increases in deposit balances, Rome Bancorp, Inc. continued to pay down debt during the first nine months of 2010. Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) decreased from $47.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $37.9 million at the end of the current quarter.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

General.  During the three months ended September 30, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded net income of $838,000, compared to $908,000 for the third quarter of 2009. The decrease in net income is comprised of an increase in net interest income before the provision for loan losses of $179,000, an increase in non-interest income of $143,000, and a decrease in income tax expense of $136,000, partially offset by an increase the provision for loan losses of $75,000, an increase in non-interest expense of $453,000.

Diluted earnings per share decreased to $0.13 per diluted share for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 from $0.14 per diluted share in the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Average diluted shares decreased to 6,526,000 for the third quarter of 2010 from 6,578,000 in the same period of 2009 due to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s stock repurchases over the past year.

Net Interest Income.  Net interest income before loan loss provision for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 increased by $179,000, or 5.5%, compared to the same quarter of 2009. This increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in interest expense due to lower average balances and rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, partially offset by a decrease in interest income due to a decrease in the average balance of loans outstanding.

Interest Income.  Interest income decreased to $4.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 from $4.3 million for the same quarter of 2009. Average loan balances for the third quarter of 2010 were $274.1 million, a decrease of $9.8 million from the average outstanding loans for the third quarter of 2009 as a result of continued sales of residential loan originations into the secondary market. The yield on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loan portfolio was stable at 5.80% for both the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and the same period last year. Interest income on securities increased by $22,000 from $157,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to $179,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. The average balance of securities increased by $4.7 million, or 37.0%, from the third quarter of 2009 to $17.4 million for the current quarter while the tax equivalent yield on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s securities decreased to 4.08% from 4.98%.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased to $753,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 from $1.1 million for the same quarter of 2009. Interest expense on deposits decreased to $454,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 from $586,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, due to lower rates paid on time deposits consistent with market trends over the past year. This was partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits to $191.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, from $186.4 million for the same period of 2009. Interest expense on borrowed funds decreased to $299,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 from $466,000 for the comparative quarter of 2009 due to a decrease in both the average balances of borrowings and their interest rates in 2010. The average balance of borrowings decreased to $37.6 million in the current quarter compared to $55.1 million in the third quarter of 2009. Cash received from increased customer deposits and loan sales were utilized to repay borrowings as they matured. The rate on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s borrowings decreased to 3.16% during the third quarter of 2010 from 3.35% in the same quarter of 2009 as Rome Bancorp, Inc. repaid some of its longer maturity advances during the first quarter of 2010.

Provision for Loan Losses.  Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded a $75,000 provision for loan losses in the third quarter of 2010, compared to no loan loss provision in the same period of 2009. The additional provision was deemed necessary to cover an increase in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s level of non-performing loans. At September 30, 2010, non-performing loans as a percent of loans increased to 0.75% compared to 0.67% at December 31, 2009. Over the same nine month period, the allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans increased to 125.2% from 111.4%. The majority of the increase in non-performing loans is in the single family residential loan portfolio, which management believesoutstanding Common Stock entitled to be adequately collateralized. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans increased to 0.93% at September 30, 2010 compared to 0.74% at December 31, 2009.

Included in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s classified assets at September 30, 2010 is a loan relationship comprised of three loans to the same borrower, which are part of a larger loan participation arrangement with other banks. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s portion of the arrangement totaled $4.6 million at September 30, 2010. The loans are secured by first and second mortgages on property held for development and several other unrelated properties. Due to the current economic climate, the borrower has been unable to develop the commercial real


TABLE OF CONTENTS

estate for sale in a timely fashion. This commercial credit was performing in accordance with contractual terms as of September 30, 2010 and was therefore accruing interest as of such date. However, management is uncertain as to the current and continued sources of debt service. Accordingly Rome Bancorp, Inc. has designated one of the loans as impaired. The loss related to this relationship could change if new information becomes available in future periods. Management is actively monitoring this credit and its associated collateral value.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. has in place procedures to identify and monitor potential problem loans. Rome Bancorp, Inc. regularly reviews problem loans and other assets in its portfolio to determine whether any require classification in accordance with Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s policy and applicable regulations. In determining the appropriate provision for loan losses, management considers the level of and trend in non-performing loans, the level of and trend in net loan charge-offs, the dollar amount and mix of the loan portfolio, as well as general economic conditions and real estate trends in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s market area, which can impact the inherent risk of loss in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loan portfolio.

Non-Interest Income and Non-Interest Expense.  Non-interest income increased by $143,000 to $808,000 in the third quarter of 2010 from $665,000 in the same period of 2009, largely due to an increase in gains realized on the sale of residential mortgage originations into the secondary market.

Non-interest expense increased by $453,000 to $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2010 from $2.6 million in the same quarter of 2009. The majority of this increase is attributable to professional fees incurred in relation to Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s impending merger with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2010 decreased to $324,000 from $460,000 in the same period of 2009, primarily due to both the decrease in pre-tax income as well as recently enacted amendments to New York State’s banking tax statutes, which reduced Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s income tax expense by $67,000.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

General.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded net income of $2.7 million compared to $2.3 million for the first nine months of 2009. The increase resulted from an increase in net interest income before the provision for loan losses of $600,000 and an increase in non-interest income of $739,000, partially offset by an increase in the provision for loan losses of $340,000, an increase in non-interest expense of $407,000 and a $176,000 increase in income tax expense.

Diluted earnings per share increased to $0.41 per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 in comparison to $0.34 per diluted share for the same period of 2009. The year-to-date 2010 average outstanding diluted shares decreased to 6,520,000 from 6,604,000 due to ongoing treasury stock purchases.

Net Interest Income.  Net interest income before loan loss provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $600,000 or 6.2%, as compared to the same period of 2009. This increase is attributable to a decrease in the average balance of borrowings and rates paid on deposits and borrowings, partially offset by a reduction in the average balances of and yields earned on assets.

Interest Income.  Interest income decreased to $12.6 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 from $13.0 million for the first three quarters of 2009. Average earning assets for the first nine months of 2010 decreased to $300.1 million from $307.8 million in the same period of 2009. This reduction is due to the sale of a substantial portion of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s newly originated residential loans into the secondary market over the past year. The yield on earning assets decreased slightly to 5.63% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from 5.65% for the first nine months of 2009. Average loan balances for the first nine months of 2010 were $281.6 million, a decrease of $9.1 million from the average outstanding loans for the same period of 2009. The yield on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loan portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 5.76% compared to a yield of 5.81% for the same period last year. Interest income on securities increased $147,000 from $362,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $509,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as the average balance of the investment portfolio increased to $15.7 million for the first nine months of 2010 from $10.5 million during the same period of 2009. Finally, interest income on federal funds sold and other interest bearing deposits decreased by $5,000 to $3,000 for the first nine months of 2010 from the same period in 2009 due to decreases in average balances of these funds.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased to $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Interest expense on deposits decreased to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of a decrease in the cost of these deposits from 1.38% to 0.99% partially offset by an increase in the average balance of deposits to $188.8 million this year from $183.7 million during the first three quarters of 2009. Interest expense on borrowed funds decreased to $902,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $1.4 million for the comparative period of 2009 primarily due to a decrease in the average balance of borrowings to $39.8 million in the current year to date as compared to $56.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Deposit growth and proceeds of loan sales have been used to pay down advances upon their maturity. The rate paid on these borrowings decreased from 3.23% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to 3.03% for the same period this year.

Provision for Loan Losses.  Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded a $540,000 provision for loan losses in the first nine months of 2010 versus a $200,000 provision in the same period of 2009. The 2010 year to date provision was recorded to provide for decline in value of collateral for a commercial loan and an increase in non-performing loans. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s ratio of non-performing loans to total loans increased to 0.75% at September 30, 2010, from 0.67% at the previous year end. The majority of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s non-performing loans are in the single family residential loan portfolio which management believes is well collateralized. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s year to date net loan charge-offs were $77,000 in the first nine months of 2010, compared to $54,000 for the same period of 2009.

In determining the appropriate provision for loan losses, management considers the level of and trend in non-performing loans, the level of and trend in net loan charge-offs, the dollar amount and mix of the loan portfolio, as well as general economic conditions and real estate trends in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s market area, which can impact the inherent risk of loss in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loan portfolio.

Non-Interest Income and Non-Interest Expense.  Non-interest income increased to $2.6 million for the first three quarters of 2010 from $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2009. The increase is attributable to gains on sales of real estate and securities and an increase in fee revenue. In the first quarter of 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. sold a parcel of non-operating commercial real estate, realizing a gain of $418,000. During the first nine months of 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded gains of $156,000 on the sales of five investment securities; by contrast in the same period of 2009 one security was sold at a gain of $26,000.

Non-interest expense increased to $8.4 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared to $8.0 million in the same period of 2009, principally due to the increase in professional fees incurred, as more described in the discussion for the third quarter, above.

Income tax expense for the first nine months of 2010 increased to $1.3 million from $1.1 million in the same period of 2009, principally due to the increase in pre-tax income.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Analysis of Net Interest Income: December 31, 2009

Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields.  The following table sets forth certain information relating to Rome Bancorp Inc.’s average balance sheets and reflects the average yield on interest-earnings assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, interest earned and interest paid for the periods indicated. Such yields and costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Average balances are derived from daily balances over the periods indicated. The average balances for loans are net of allowance for loan losses, but include non-accrual loans. Interest income on securities includes a tax equivalent adjustment for bank qualified municipals.

         
         
 Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields for the Years Ended
   December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007
   Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/Cost
 Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/Cost
 Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/Cost
   (Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
                                             
Interest Earning Assets:
                                             
Loans $289,010  $16,763   5.80 $288,630  $17,561   6.08 $270,373  $17,481   6.47
Securities  11,557   529   4.58   7,488   392   5.24   6,452   437   6.77 
Federal funds sold and other interest bearing deposits  7,456   11   0.15   1,250   26   2.04   1,110   52   4.67 
Total interest-earning assets  308,023   17,303   5.62   297,368   17,979   6.05   277,935   17,970   6.47 
Non interest-earning assets  27,609         29,994         28,625       
Total assets $335,632        $327,362        $306,560       
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                                             
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                             
Savings accounts $82,315  $330   0.40  $80,971  $446   0.55  $82,355  $454   0.55 
Time deposits  72,291   1,852   2.56   72,347   2,634   3.64   69,822   2,834   4.06 
Money Market accounts  15,125   189   1.25   9,833   193   1.97   6,994   139   1.99 
Other interest bearing deposits  13,970   55   0.40   13,357   69   0.51   11,695   65   0.56 
Total interest-bearing deposits  183,701   2,426   1.32   176,508   3,342   1.89   170,866   3,492   2.04 
Borrowings  56,216   1,824   3.25   50,737   1,545   3.04   27,883   1,306   4.68 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  239,917   4,250   1.77   227,245   4,887   2.15   198,749   4,798   2.41 
Noninterest bearing deposits  30,065             29,331             28,337           
Other liabilities  7,033         5,849         5,662       
Total liabilities  277,015             262,425             232,708           
Shareholders’ equity  58,617         64,937         73,852       
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $335,632        $327,362        $306,560       
Net interest income       13,053             13,092             13,172      
Tax equivalent adjustment on securities     (12        (25        (51   
Net interest income per consolidated financial statements    $13,041        $13,067        $13,121    
Net interest rate spread            3.85            3.90            4.06
Net interest margin            4.24            4.40            4.74
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities            1.28x             1.31x             1.40x 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rate Volume Analysis.  The following table analyzes the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It shows the amount of the change in interest income or expense caused by either changes in outstanding balances (volume) or changes in interest rates. The effect of a change in volume is measured by applying the average rate during the first period to the volume change between the two periods. The effect of changes in rate is measured by applying the change in rate between the two periods to the average volume during the first period. Changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the absolute value of the change due to volume and the change due to rate.

      
 Rate Volume Analysis
   Year Ended December 31, 2009
Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
 Year Ended December 31, 2008
Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
   Increases (decreases) due to  Increases (decreases) due to 
   Rate Volume Net Rate Volume Net
   (in thousands)
Assets:
                              
Interest-earning assets:
                              
Loans $(837 $39  $(798 $(1,125 $1,205  $80 
Securities  (76  213   137   (115  70   (45
Federal funds sold and other Interest bearing deposits  (142  127   (15  (33  7   (26
Total interest-earning assets  (1,055  379   (676  (1,273  1,282   9 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                              
Savings accounts  (123  7   (116     (8  (8
Time deposits  (780  (2  (782  (302  102   (200
Money market accounts  (109  104   (5  (2  56   54 
Other interest bearing deposits  (16  3   (13  (6  10   4 
Total interest-bearing deposits  (1,028  112   (916  (310  160   (150
Borrowings  113   166   279   (832  1,071   239 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  (915  278   (637  (1,142  1,231   89 
Net change in interest income $(140 $101  $(39 $(131 $51  $(80

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008

Rome Bancorp Inc.’s total assets at December 31, 2009 were $329.9 million, a decrease of $8.0 million or 2.4% from $337.9 million at December 31, 2008. The majority of this decrease was attributable to contraction of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loan portfolio.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased to $7.6 million at December 31, 2009 from $9.6 million a year earlier. Securities available for sale were $10.0 million at December 31, 2009, an increase of $6.4 million from $3.6 million at December 31, 2008. This increase was due to the purchase of eighteen bonds, partially offset by principal reductions and maturities in the existing bond portfolio. Rome Bancorp Inc.’s investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock decreased by $356,000 in 2009, in connection with a reduction in its line of credit borrowing with this institution.

Total loans decreased by $12.7 million, or 4.2% to $287.7 million at December 31, 2009 from $300.4 million at December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2009, Rome Bancorp, Inc. originated approximately $51.5 million of loans. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s residential mortgage construction and loan portfolio, decreased by $14.7 million, or 8.4%, primarily due to the sale of the majority of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s 2009 originations of thirty year termed fixed-rate mortgages into the secondary market. The decision to sell these originations was made to control potential interest rate risk in periods of future rising interest rates. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans increased to 0.67% at December 31, 2009 as compared to 0.42% at December 31, 2008, primarily due to increased


TABLE OF CONTENTS

residential mortgage delinquencies and decreased loan balances. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans decreased to 111.4% at December 31, 2009, from 152.4% at December 31, 2008.

Total deposits increased by $10.7 million or 5.2% from $205.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $216.6 million at December 31, 2009, as depositors chose insured bank deposit accounts over other available investments. Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded growth in all deposit categories except for time deposits, which declined by $235,000, or 0.3%. Money market balances grew by $3.7 million, or 31.1%, in 2009, increasing from $12.0 million at December 31, 2008 to $15.7 million at December 31, 2009. Non-interest bearing deposits increased by $3.4 million, or 12.0%, over the past year. Savings deposits increased $2.8 million from $79.2 million at December 31, 2008 to $82.0 million at December 31, 2009. Other interest bearing deposits increased by $985,000, or 6.9%, from $14.2 million at December 31, 2008 to $15.2 million at year end 2009.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008

General.  Net income for the year ended December 31, 2009 increased to $3.1 million from $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in net income was attributable to an increase in non-interest income of $578,000, partially offset by a decrease in net interest income before provision for loan losses of $26,000, and increases in non-interest expense and income tax expense of $279,000 and $91,000, respectively.

Net Interest Income.  Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded net interest income of $13.0 million in 2009 and $13.1 million in 2008. The changes in the components of net interest income are discussed in detail below.

Interest Income.  Interest income decreased by $663,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Interest income earned on the loan portfolio decreased to $16.8 million in 2009 from $17.6 million in 2008. Average balances of the loan portfolio remained constant at approximately $289 million in both 2009 and 2008. The yield on loans in 2009 decreased to 5.80% compared to 6.08% in 2008 concurrent with the decline in overall underlying interest rates. Interest and dividend income on securities increased in 2009 primarily due to growth in the available for sale portfolio. Average securities increased to $11.6 million in 2009 from $7.5 million in 2008 while their tax equivalent yields decreased to 4.58% from 5.24% over the same period. Interest income of other short-term investments, including federal funds sold, dropped from $26,000 in 2008 to $11,000 in 2009, as a result of a decrease in the yield earned on these funds, again driven by declines in market interest rates throughout latter 2008 and into 2009.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased to $4.3 million in 2009 from $4.9 million in 2008 primarily due to a decrease in the cost of funds, consistent with current market trends, partially offset by increases in the average balances of outstanding borrowings and deposits. Interest expense on borrowings increased from $1.5 million in 2008 to $1.8 million in 2009 as the average balances increased from $50.7 million in 2008 to $56.2 million in the current year. The average rate paid on these borrowings increased to 3.25% in 2009 from 3.04% in 2008, as Rome Bancorp, Inc. restructured its floating rate debt into longer term fixed-rate maturities in order to take advantage of the historically low interest rate levels. The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits in 2009 decreased to 1.32% from 1.89% in 2008, principally due to lower rates paid on time deposits and savings accounts.

Provision for Loan Losses.  Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded a provision for loan losses of $300,000 in both 2009 and 2008. While the level of non-performing loans has increased over the past year, Rome Bancorp, Inc. has had a reduction in its actual loan losses. Net loan charge-offs decreased to $104,000 in 2009 from $274,000 in the prior year. The allowance for loan losses increased to $2.1 million or 0.74% of total loans at December 31, 2009 compared to $1.9 million and 0.64% of total loans at December 31, 2008. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans decreased to 111.4% at December 31, 2009 compared to 152.1% at December 31, 2008. Management considers these ratios to be appropriate due to the current composition of the loan portfolio and level of non-performing loans. Non-performing loans, consisting of non-accrual loans and loans 90 days past due and still accruing, were $1.9 million or 0.67% of total loans at December 31, 2009 compared to $1.3 million or 0.42% at December 31, 2008. The Rome Savings Bank does not originate or hold subprime mortgage loans or securities collateralized by subprime loans.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

In determining the level of the provision for loan losses necessary to absorb probable incurred credit losses, management considers historical loan loss experience, review of specific loans, the level of and trend in non-performing loans, the level of and trend in net loan charge-offs, the dollar amount and mix of the loan portfolio, as well as general economic conditions and real estate trends in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s market area, which can impact the inherent risk of loss in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loan portfolio. As a result of these factors, management determined that a provision of $300,000 was appropriate in 2009.

Non-Interest Income.  The following table summarizes changes in the major components of non-interest income:

    
 2009 2008 $ Change % Change
   (Dollars in thousands)
Gain (loss) on securities $73  $(265 $338   127.55
Gain on sale of loans  155   17   138   811.76 
Service charges  1,815   1,706   109   6.39 
Other income  479   486   (7  (1.44
Total non-interest income $2,522  $1,944  $578   29.73

Non-interest income increased $578,000 to $2.5 million in 2009 from $1.9 million in 2008. During 2009, Rome Bancorp, Inc. sold two investment securities, yielding gains of $73,000; no investments were sold in 2008. In contrast, in 2008, in relation to declines in global investment markets, Rome Bancorp, Inc. recognized a write-down of $265,000 on its investment in a large blue chip mutual fund, due to impairment that was determined to be “other than temporary” under generally accepted accounting principles. In light of the low interest rate environment existent in 2009, Rome Bancorp, Inc. opted to sell the majority of its current year fixed-rate thirty year termed residential mortgage originations into the secondary market. Loan sales increased to $11.2 million in 2009, compared to $1.2 million in 2008, accounting for the increase in gains on loan sales. Service charge income increased commensurate with deposit and loan activity.

Non-Interest Expense.  Non-interest expense increased to $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The following table summarizes changes in the major components of non-interest expense:

    
 2009 2008 $ Change % Change
   (Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits $6,143  $5,733  $410   7.15
Occupancy and equipment expense  1,918   1,903   15   0.79 
Regulatory assessments  416   140   276   197.14 
Outside consulting and professional fees  421   580   (159  (27.41
Other expense  1,791   2,054   (263  (12.80
Total non-interest expense $10,689  $10,410  $279   (2.68)% 

The increase in salaries and employee benefits is largely related to higher defined benefit pension plan expense resulting from a 2008 decline in the market value of plan assets. Due to overall higher assessment rates charged to all banks insured by the FDIC, as well as a special assessment, Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s FDIC and regulatory assessment expense increased to $416,000 in 2009 from $140,000 in the prior year. In 2009 Rome Bancorp, Inc. required less legal, professional and consulting services. Major components of the decrease in other expenses were in the areas of other real estate owned and contribution expense. Due to a reduction in other real estate owned during 2009, Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s expense decreased by $98,000 to $10,000 in 2009. Contribution expense decreased from $151,000 in 2008 to $17,000 in 2009 due to the 2008 donation of a parcel of Company owned real estate to the Rome Rescue Mission, Inc.

Income Tax Expense.  Income tax expense was $1.5 million for 2009, an increase of $91,000 from 2008 income tax expense of $1.4 million. The increase is attributable to higher pre-tax earnings.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007

General.  Net income for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $2.9 million, a decrease of $149,000 from $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in net income was attributable to decreases in net interest income before loan loss provision of $54,000, an increase in the provision for loan losses of $250,000, and a decrease in non-interest income of $219,000, partially offset by decreases in non-interest expense and income tax expense of $162,000 and $212,000, respectively.

Net Interest Income.  Rome Bancorp, Inc. recorded net interest income of $13.1 million in both 2008 and 2007. The changes in the components of net interest income are discussed in detail below.

Interest Income.  Interest income increased by $35,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $17.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Interest income earned on the loan portfolio increased to $17.6 million in 2008 from $17.5 million in 2007. Average loan balances increased to $288.6 million in 2008 from $270.4 million in 2007, primarily due to growth in the residential mortgage portfolio. The yield on loans in 2008 decreased to 6.08% compared to 6.47% in 2007 concurrent with the decline in overall benchmark interest rates. Interest and dividend income on securities decreased in 2008 primarily due to a decline in the yield on these assets. Average securities increased to $7.5 million in 2008 from $6.5 million in 2007 while their yields decreased to 5.24% from 6.77% over the same period. Interest income of other short-term investments, including federal funds sold, dropped from $52,000 in 2007 to $26,000 in 2008, as a result of a decrease in the yield earned on these funds, again driven by declines in market interest rates throughout 2008.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased to $4.9 million in 2008 from $4.8 million in 2007 primarily due to increases in the average balances of outstanding debt and deposits, partially offset by a decrease in the cost of these funds, consistent with current market trends. Interest expense on borrowings increased from $1.3 million in 2007 to $1.5 million in 2008 as the average balances increased from $27.9 million in 2007 to $50.7 million in 2008. The average rate paid on this debt decreased to 3.04% in 2008 from 4.68% in 2007. The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits in 2008 was 1.89% compared to 2.04% in 2007, principally due to lower rates paid on time deposits.

Provision for Loan Losses.  The provision for loan losses was $300,000 in 2008 compared to $50,000 in 2007, reflecting a higher level of charge-offs and loan growth in 2008. Net loan charge-offs increased to $274,000 in 2008 from $105,000 in the prior year. The allowance for loan losses was $1.9 million or 0.64% of total loans at December 31, 2008 compared to $1.9 million and 0.68% of total loans at December 31, 2007. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans decreased to 152.1% at December 31, 2008 compared to 190.4% at December 31, 2007. Management considers these ratios to be appropriate due to the net growth in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s residential mortgage and construction loan portfolio of $21.5 million, or 14.1% in 2008. Due to stringent underwriting standards, the history of losses on the residential mortgage loan portfolio is significantly lower than on the other types of loans. Non-performing loans, consisting of non-accrual loans and loans 90 days past due and still accruing, were $1.3 million or 0.42% of total loans at December 31, 2008 compared to $1.0 million or 0.35% at December 31, 2007. The Rome Savings Bank does not originate or hold subprime mortgage loans or securities collateralized by subprime loans.

In determining the level of the provision for loan losses necessary to absorb probable incurred credit losses, management considers historical loan loss experience, review of specific loans, the level of and trend in non-performing loans, the level of and trend in net loan charge-offs, the dollar amount and mix of the loan portfolio, as well as general economic conditions and real estate trends in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s market area, which can impact the inherent risk of loss in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loan portfolio. As a result of these factors, management determined that a provision of $300,000 was appropriate in 2008.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Non-Interest Income.  The following table summarizes changes in the major components of non-interest income:

    
 2008 2007 $ Change % Change
   (Dollars in thousands)
(Loss) gain on securities $(265 $11  $(276  (2,509.10)% 
Gain on sale of loans  17   18   (1  (5.56
Service charges  1,706   1,654   52   3.14 
Other income  486   480   6   1.25 
Total non-interest income $1,944  $2,163  $(219  (10.12)% 

Non-interest income decreased $219,000 to $1.9 million in 2008 from $2.2 million in 2007. During the fourth quarter of 2008, in relation to declines in global investment markets, Rome Bancorp, Inc. recognized a write-down of $265,000 on its investment in a large blue chip mutual fund, due to impairment that was determined to be “other than temporary” under generally accepted accounting principles. This charge reduced fourth quarter and year to date net earnings by $162,000, or $0.02 per diluted share. After the write-down to fair market value, this investment is valued at $472,000. As this investment is classified as an available for sale security, stockholder’s equity had already been reduced by the amount of the unrealized loss, net of taxes. The “other than temporary” write-down does not necessarily mean that the value has been permanently lost. The fair market value of the security has in fact increased during 2009. Service charge income increased commensurate with deposit and loan activity.

Non-Interest Expense.  Non-interest expense decreased to $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The following table summarizes changes in the major components of non-interest expense:

    
 2008 2007 $ Change % Change
   (Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits $5,733  $5,887  $(154  (2.62)% 
Occupancy and equipment expense  1,903   1,896   7   0.37 
Marketing expense  128   176   (48  (27.27
Outside consulting and professional fees  580   712   (132  (18.54
Other expense  2,066   1,901   165   8.68 
Total non-interest expense $10,410  $10,572  $(162  (1.53)% 

The decrease in salaries and employee benefits is primarily related to lower stock-based compensation and benefits costs. Advertising and promotional expense decreased from 2007 when Rome Bancorp, Inc. opened its fifth branch location and heavily promoted demand deposit accounts. In 2008 Rome Bancorp, Inc. required less legal and consulting services. A major component of the increase in other expenses was contribution expense. Contribution expense increased from $15,000 in 2007 to $151,000 in 2008 due to the donation of a parcel of Company owned real estate to the Rome Rescue Mission, Inc.

Income Tax Expense.  Income tax expense was $1.4 million for 2008, a decrease of $212,000 from 2007 income tax expense of $1.6 million. The decrease is attributable to lower pre-tax earnings, an increase in positive permanent tax benefits and favorable settlement of a state tax audit.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s primary sources of funds consist of deposits, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loans, maturities of investments, interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions and funds provided from operations. The Rome Savings Bank also has borrowing capacity with the FHLB that allows it to borrow up to $57.8 million which is collateralized by a portion of the residential mortgage portfolio. At September 30, 2010, The Rome Savings Bank had no outstanding borrowings against this line of credit, and outstanding advances and amortizing notes totaling $37.9 million. At September 30, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. also had approximately $8.5 million in unused short term borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which is collateralized by a portion of the consumer loan portfolio.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Loan repayments and maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of investment securities, and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions, and competition in the marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of the timing of these sources of funds.

Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s primary investing activities include the origination of loans and, to a lesser extent, the purchase of investment securities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. originated loans of approximately $40.8 million, compared to $39.9 million of loans in the same period of 2009. For the past several quarters, Rome Bancorp, Inc. has been selling a large percentage of its residential loan originations into the secondary market. Loan sales through nine months of 2010 were $14.1 million, compared to $7.3 million for the same period of 2009. These loans are sold with Rome Bancorp, Inc. retaining the servicing for the purchasers. Year to date 2010 security purchases were $5.4 million compared to $7.2 million for the same period of 2009.

At September 30, 2010, Rome Bancorp, Inc. had loan commitments to borrowers of approximately $13.4 million, and available letters and lines of credit of approximately $19.1 million.

Time deposit accounts scheduled to mature within one year were $49.7 million at September 30, 2010. Based on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, Rome Bancorp, Inc. anticipates that a significant portion of these time deposits will remain with Rome Bancorp, Inc. Rome Bancorp, Inc. is committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position; therefore, Rome Bancorp, Inc. monitors its liquidity position on a daily basis. Rome Bancorp, Inc. anticipates that Rome Bancorp, Inc. will have sufficient funds to meet Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s current funding commitments. The marginal cost of new funding however, whether from deposits or borrowings from the FHLB, will be carefully considered as Rome Bancorp, Inc. monitors its liquidity needs. Therefore, in order to minimize its cost of funds, Rome Bancorp, Inc. may consider additional borrowings from the FHLB in the future.

At September 30, 2010, The Rome Savings Bank exceeded each of the applicable regulatory capital requirements. The Rome Savings Bank’s leverage (Tier 1) capital at September 30, 2010 was $57.5 million, or 17.25% of adjusted assets. In order to be classified as “well-capitalized” by the Office of Thrift Supervision, The Rome Savings Bankvote thereon is required to have leverage (Tier 1) capital of $16.7 million, or 5.0% of adjusted assets. To be classified as a well-capitalized bank by the Office of Thrift Supervision, The Rome Savings Bank must also have a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0%. At September 30, 2010, The Rome Savings Bank had a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 23.78% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 24.85%.approve this amendment.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. paid cash dividends of $0.27 per share during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaling $1.8 million.

During the first nine months of 2010, $201,000 was expended to repurchase 22,568 shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock.

Rome Bancorp, Inc. does not anticipate any material capital expenditures, nor does it have any balloon or other payments due on any long-term obligations or any off-balance sheet items other than the commitments and unused lines of credit noted above.

Management of Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is the most significant market risk affecting Rome Bancorp, Inc. Other types of market risk, such as movements in foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices, do not arise in the normal course of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s business operations. Interest rate risk can be defined as an exposure to a movement in interest rates that could have an adverse effect on Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s net interest income. Interest rate risk arises naturally from the imbalance in the repricing, maturity, and/or cash flow characteristics of assets and liabilities. In periods of falling interest rates, prepayments of loans typically increase, which would lead to reduced net interest income if such proceeds could not be reinvested at a comparable spread. Also in a falling rate environment, certain categories of deposits may reach a point where market forces prevent further reduction in the interest rate paid on those instruments. Generally, during extended periods when short-term and long-term interest rates are relatively close, a flat yield curve may lead to smaller net


TABLEBERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.’S BOARD OF CONTENTS

interest margins thereby reducing net interest income. The net effect of these circumstances is reduced interest income, offset only by a nominal decrease in interest expense, thereby narrowing the net interest margin.

Managing interest rate risk is of primary importance to Rome Bancorp, Inc. The responsibility for interest rate risk management is the function of Rome Bancorp’s Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which includes the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Controller, other members of Senior Management and certain members of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s Board of Directors. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s ALCO meets at least quarterly to review Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s asset/liability policies and identify and measure potential risks to earnings due to changes in interest rates. The primary goal of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s interest rate risk management is to minimize the potential loss in net interest income that could arise from changes in interest rates.

A simulation model is the primary tool used to assess the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Key assumptions used in the model include prepayment speeds on loans and mortgage-backed securities, loan volumes and pricing and customer preferences, and sensitivity to changing rates. These assumptions are compared to actual results and revised as necessary. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s analysis compares net interest income under a scenario of no change from current interest rates with one of a 100, 200 and 300 basis point increase in interest rates and one of a 100 basis point decrease in rates. The change in interest rates is assumed to occur in the first twelve months following the current financial statement date. Net interest income is measured for each of the three twelve-month periods following the balance sheet date. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s policy is that net interest income should not vary by more than 20% for each of the three forecasted twelve-month periods. At December 31, 2009, based on simulation model results, Rome Bancorp was within these guidelines.

The following table sets forth at December 31, 2009 and 2008 the estimated percentage and dollar change in Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s net interest income resulting from changes in interest rates over a one year period. Certain assumptions have been made in preparing the table below. Although management believes these assumptions to be reasonable, the interest rate sensitivity of assets and liabilities and the estimated effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income indicated in the following table could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or if actual experience differs from such assumptions.

      
 2009 2008
   Annual Net Interest Income Annual Net Interest Income
Change in Interest
Rates in Basis
Points(1)
 Dollar
Amount
 Dollar
Change
From Base
 Percentage
Change From
Base
 Dollar
Amount
 Dollar
Change
From Base
 Percentage
Change From
Base
   (Dollars in thousands)
+300 $13,456  $(280  (2.04)%  $13,451  $(289  (2.10)% 
+200  13,537   (199  (1.45  13,588   (152  (1.11
+100  13,599   (137  (1.00  13,749   9   0.07 
Base  13,736         13,740       
-100  13,240   (496  (3.61  13,476   (264  (1.92

(1)Assumes an instantaneous uniform change in interest rates. Basis point equals 0.01%

The above table reflects that as of both December 31, 2009 and 2008, Rome Bancorp, Inc. had a relatively low risk of volatility in net interest income due to interest rate fluctuations. The interest rate risk modeled as of December 31, 2009 was equal to or slightly higher than in 2008, exhibiting negative variances in periods of rising and decreasing interest rates. In the upward rate environments, the most immediate interest rate risk lies with Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s $71.9 million of time deposits, a portion of which will reprice upwards during the period in relation to changes in prevailing interest rates. However, in the simulation of a 100 basis point decrease in rates, the decrease in net interest income is primarily attributable to assumed reductions in the rates on the Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s loan portfolio which would not be entirely offset by the cost decreases on interest bearing liabilities.


TABLEDIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE AMENDMENT OF CONTENTS

Properties

Rome Bancorp, Inc. conducts its business through its executive office, operations center, which includes both the Mortgage Center and the Accounting Center listed below, and four banking offices. In addition, we have purchased land in Oneida, New York for potential expansion into that market. At December 31, 2009, the net book value of the computer equipment and other furniture, fixtures and equipment of The Rome Savings Bank and Rome Bancorp, Inc. at their offices totaled $820,000.

   
Location Leased or
Owned
 Original Date
Acquired
 Net Book
Value
December 31,
2009
         (In thousands)
Executive Office:
               
100 West Dominick St.
Rome, NY
  Owned   1956  $1,125 
Branch Offices:
               
1629 Black River Boulevard
Rome, NY
  Owned   1963   215 
1300 Erie Boulevard
Rome, NY
  Owned   1997   957 
82 Seneca Turnpike
New Hartford, NY
  Owned   1983   117 
Rt. 26 and Elmer Hill Rd
Lee, NY
  Owned   2006   1,624 
Mortgage Center:
               
137 West Dominick Street
Rome, NY
  Owned   2002   413 
Accounting Center:
               
139 West Dominick Street
Rome, NY
  Owned   1995   316 
Undeveloped Land:
               
Oneida, NY  Owned   2006   454 

Stock Ownership

The table below provides certain information about beneficial ownership of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock as of [Record Date]. The table shows information for:

Each person, or group of affiliated person, who is known to Rome Bancorp, Inc. to beneficially own more than 5% of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock;
Each of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s directors;
Each of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s executive officers; and
All of Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s directors and executive officers as a group.

TABLETHE CERTIFICATE OF CONTENTS

Except as otherwise noted, the persons or entities in this table have sole voting and investing power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable. Except as otherwise noted, the address of each person is care of Rome Bancorp, Inc. at Rome Bancorp, Inc.’s principal executive office.

   
Name Number of
Shares Owned
(Excluding
Options)
 Number of
Shares That
May Be
Acquired
Within
60 Days by
Exercising
Options
 Percent of Total
Common Stock
Outstanding(1)
Bruce R. Engelbert(2)  102,965   23,600   1.87
David C. Grow(3)  104,834   23,600   1.89
Kirk B. Hinman(4)  302,523   23,600   4.81
Dale A. Laval(5)  16,300   23,600   * 
David C. Nolan(6)  144,239   47,200   2.82
John A. Reinhardt(7)  1,450      * 
Charles M. Sprock(8)  315,916   118,000   6.40
Michael J. Valentine  132,696   23,600   2.31
Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust of Rome Bancorp, Inc.(9)  689,488      10.17
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(10)
Palisades West, Bld. 1, 6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, Texas 78746
  471,610      6.96
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)(11)(12)  1,030,923   283,200   24.82

*less than 1%
(1)Based on 6,777,551 shares of Rome Bancorp, Inc. common stock outstanding on [Record Date] plus, for each person, the number of shares that such person may acquire within 60 days of such date by exercising stock options.
(2)Includes 20,784 shares held in Mr. Engelbert’s Individual Retirement and Deferred Compensation Accounts and 16,918 shares held by Mr. Engelbert’s spouse.
(3)Includes 24,152 shares held in Mr. Grow’s Individual Retirement Account and 2,381 shares held individually by Mr. Grow’s spouse.
(4)Includes 3,401 shares held in Mr. Hinman’s Individual Retirement Account; 111,016 shares held jointly with Mr. Hinman’s spouse; 5,401 shares held as custodian for a minor; 5,000 shares held by a trust over which Mr. Hinman exercises control; and 125,123 shares held by Rome Strip Steel Co., Inc. of which Mr. Hinman serves as President.
(5)Includes 3,500 shares held in Mr. Laval’s Individual Retirement Account.
(6)Includes 19,092 shares held in trust pursuant to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan that have been allocated as of December 31, 2009 over which Mr. Nolan has voting power, subject to the legal duties of the ESOP Trustee, but no investment power, except in limited circumstances.
(7)Includes 750 shares held jointly with Mr. Reinhardt’s spouse and 700 shares held in Mr. Reinhardt’s spouse’s IRA.
(8)Includes 8,118 shares held individually by Mr. Sprock’s spouse and 29,335 shares held in trust pursuant to the ESOP that have been allocated as of September 30, 2010 over which Mr. Sprock has voting power, subject to the legal duties of the ESOP trustee, but no investment power, except in limited circumstances.
(9)The ESOP is administered by an ESOP Committee (“ESOP Committee”) and its assets are held in trust by a trustee (“Plan Trustee”). The number of shares listed as beneficially owned represents the entire number of shares of Rome Bancorp common stock held by RSGroup Trust Company, as Plan Trustee, as of September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, 411,213 of such shares of Rome Bancorp common stock had been allocated to individual accounts established for participating employees and their

TABLEINCORPORATION OF CONTENTS

beneficiaries, and 278,275 of such shares were held, unallocated, for allocation in future years. In general, participating employees and their beneficiaries have the power and authority to direct the voting of shares of Rome Bancorp common stock allocated to their individual accounts. Such allocated shares are, therefore, not included as shares over which the reporting person has sole or shared voting power. The reporting person, through the Plan Trustee, has shared voting power over unallocated Rome Bancorp common stock. Any unallocated Rome Bancorp common stock is generally required to be voted by the Plan Trustee in the same proportion as Rome Bancorp common stock which has been allocated to participants is directed to be voted. The ESOP, through the Plan Trustee (who is instructed by the ESOP Committee) shares dispositive power over all unallocated common stock held by the reporting person. The ESOP, acting through the Plan Trustee (who is instructed by the ESOP Committee) shares dispositive power over allocated Rome Bancorp common stock with participating employees and their beneficiaries, who have the right to determine whether Rome Bancorp common stock allocated to their respective accounts will be tendered in response to a tender offer but otherwise have no dispositive power. Any unallocated Rome Bancorp common stock is generally required to be tendered by the Plan Trustee in the same proportion as Rome Bancorp common stock which has been allocated to Participants is directed to be tendered. In limited circumstances, ERISA may confer upon the Plan Trustee the power and duty to control the voting and tendering of Rome Bancorp common stock allocated to the accounts of participating employees and beneficiaries who fail to exercise their voting and/or tender rights. The ESOP disclaims voting power with respect to such allocated Rome Bancorp common stock.
(10)Based on a Schedule 13G/A dated December 31, 2009 and filed with the SEC on February 10, 2010 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is an investment advisor to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manager to certain other commingled group trusts and separate accounts. In its role as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP possesses investment and/or voting power over the shares owned by the investment companies, the trusts and the accounts.
(11)Includes unvested restricted stock awards of 2,360 shares made to each non-employee director, with the exception of Mr. Reinhardt, under the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan. Includes unvested restricted stock awards of 11,800 and 4,720 shares awarded to Mr. Sprock and Mr. Nolan, respectively, under the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan. Each recipient of a restricted share award has sole voting power, but no investment power, over the common stock covered by the award. The restricted stock will vest at the rate of 20% per year on each anniversary date of the grant, with accelerated vesting upon death, disability, retirement or change in control.
(12)The number of shares for all executive officers and directors as a group of eight persons includes 278,275 shares held by the ESOP Trust that have not been allocated to eligible participants as of September 30, 2010, over which certain directors and executive officers may be deemed to have shared investment power, thereby causing such directors and executive officers to be beneficial owners of such shares. Each of such directors and executive officers disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares and accordingly, such shares are not attributed to them individually. The individual participants in the ESOP have shared voting power with the ESOP Trustee.

TABLEBERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF CONTENTSAUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK.

ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETINGMEETINGS

If there are not sufficient votes to constitute a quorum or to approve the merger agreementMerger Agreement at the time of the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy special meeting, the merger agreementMerger Agreement cannot be approved unless the Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy special meeting is adjourned to a later date or dates to permit further solicitation of proxies. To allow proxies that have been received by Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy at the time of the special meeting to be voted for an adjournment, if deemed necessary, Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy has submitted the question of adjournment to its stockholders as a separate matter for their consideration. The board of directors of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the adjournment proposal. If it is deemed necessary to adjourn the special meeting, no notice of the adjourned meeting is required to be given to stockholders, other than an announcement at the meeting of the place, date and time to which the meeting is adjourned.

If there are not sufficient votes to constitute a quorum or to approve the Merger Agreement or to approve the amendment to the Berkshire Hills Certificate of Incorporation at the time of the Berkshire Hills special meeting, neither the Merger Agreement nor the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation can be approved unless the Berkshire Hills special meeting is adjourned to a later date or dates to permit further solicitation of proxies. To allow proxies that have been received by Berkshire Hills at the time of the special meeting to be voted for an adjournment, if deemed necessary, Berkshire Hills has submitted the question of adjournment to its stockholders as a separate matter for their consideration. The board of directors of Berkshire Hills unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the adjournment proposal. If it is deemed necessary to adjourn the special meeting, no notice of the adjourned meeting is required to be given to stockholders, other than an announcement at the meeting of the place, date and time to which the meeting is adjourned.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be issued in the proposed mergerMerger has been passed upon for Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. by Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, Washington, D.C. Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick and SNR Denton USNutter McClennen & Fish LLP will deliver opinions to Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Rome Bancorp, Inc.,Legacy, respectively, as to certain federal income tax consequences of the merger.Merger. See “Description of The Merger — Material Tax Consequences of the Merger.”

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 20092010 and 20082009 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20092010 have been incorporated by reference to this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus in reliance upon the report of Wolf & Company, P.C., independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing therein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The consolidated financial statements of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy as of December 31, 20092010 and 20082009 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20092010 have been included inincorporated by reference to this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus in reliance upon the report of Crowe Horwath LLP,Wolf & Company, P.C., independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein,therein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy will hold its 2011 annual meeting only if the mergerMerger is not completed. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sLegacy’s bylaws provide that in order for a stockholder to make nominations for the election of directors or proposals for business to be brought before the annual meeting, a stockholder must deliver notice of such nominations and/or proposals to the Secretary of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy at least 90 days before the anniversary dateannual meeting. However, if Legacy gives less than 100 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the immediately preceding annual meeting. Rome Bancorp, Inc.’smeeting, written notice of the stockholder proposal or nomination must be delivered to the Secretary not later than ten days following the date notice of the meeting was mailed to stockholders or public disclosure of the meeting was made. Legacy’s last annual meeting was held on May 12, 2010.

Berkshire Hills must receive proposals that stockholders seek to include in the proxy statement for the Berkshire Hills’ next annual meeting no later than November 26, 2011. If next year’s annual meeting is held on a date more than 30 calendar days from May 5, 2010.2012, a stockholder proposal must be received by a reasonable time before Berkshire Hills begins to print and mail its proxy solicitation for such annual meeting. Any stockholder proposals will be subject to the requirements of the proxy rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Berkshire Hills’ bylaws provide that, in order for a stockholder to make nominations for the election of directors or proposals for business to be brought before the annual meeting, a stockholder must deliver notice of such nominations and/or proposals to the Corporate Secretary not less than 90 days before the date of the annual meeting. However, if less than 100 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting is given to stockholders, such notice must be received not later than the close of business of the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed to stockholders or prior public disclosure of the meeting date was made. A copy of the bylaws may be obtained from Berkshire Hills.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act to register the shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock to be issued to Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy stockholders in the merger.Merger. This proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is a part of that registration statement and constitutes a prospectus of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., a proxy statement of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. for its special meeting and a proxy statement of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy for its special meeting. As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus does not contain all of the information that you can find in the registration statement or in the exhibits to the registration statement. The additional information may be inspected and copied as set forth above.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy each files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website atwww.sec.gov. You may also read and copy


TABLE OF CONTENTS

any document Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.or Legacy files with the Securities and Exchange Commission at its public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of these documents also can be obtained at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission, at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington D.C. 20549 or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330 for additional information on the operation of the public reference facilities.

The Securities and Exchange Commission allows Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. to “incorporate by reference” information into this proxy statement/prospectus.Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. This means that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this document, except for any information superseded by information contained directly in this document. This document incorporates by reference the other documents that are listed below that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. hasand Legacy have previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and additional documents that Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. filesand Legacy file with the Securities and Exchange Commission between the date of this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the date of the Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.and Legacy stockholder meeting.meetings. These documents contain important information about Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ and Legacy’s financial condition.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. FILINGS (File No. 000-51584)

 
Filings Period of Report or Date Filed

•  

Annual Report on Form 10-K

 Year ended December 31, 20092010

•  

Quarterly ReportCurrent Reports on Form 10-Q8-K

 Quarter ended September 30, 2010
January 29, 2010, February 2, 2010, April 22, 2010, May 7, 2010, July 12, 2010, October 12, 2010, October 25, 2010 and November 10, 2010 (other than information furnished under Items 2.02 or 7.01 of Form 8-K)

•  

Current Reports on Form 8-K

•  

The description of Berkshire common stock set forth in the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed October 25, 2005, which incorporates by reference the portion of the “Description of Berkshire Hills Stock” contained in Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) on May 26, 2000.

Documents incorporated by reference are available from Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. without charge (except for exhibits to the documents unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated in this document by reference). You may obtain documents incorporated by reference in this document by requesting them in writing or by telephone from Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. at the following address:

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
Attention: Investor Relations Department
Telephone: (413) 236-3239

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
Attention: Investor Relations Department
Telephone: (413) 236-3239

If you would like to request documents from Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., please do so by ________,, to receive them before Rome Bancorp, Inc.’sBerkshire Hills’ meeting of stockholders. If you request any incorporated documents, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. will mail them to you by first-class mail, or other equally prompt means, within one business day of its receipt of your request.

Berkshire Hills incorporates by reference additional documents that it may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission between the date of this document and the date of the special meetings. These documents include periodic reports, such as annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K (other than information furnished under Items 2.02 or 7.01 of Form 8-K), as well as proxy statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

LEGACY BANCORP, INC. FILINGS (File No. 000-51525)

FilingsPeriod of Report or Date Filed

•  

Annual Report on Form 10-K

Year ended December 31, 2010

•  

Current Reports on Form 8-K

_______________ (other than information furnished under Items 2.02 or 7.01 of Form 8-K)

•  

The description of Legacy common stock set forth in the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed, which incorporates by reference the portion of the “Description of Legacy Stock” contained in Legacy’s prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) on.

Documents incorporated by reference are available from Legacy without charge (except for exhibits to the documents unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated in this document by reference). You may obtain documents incorporated by reference in this document by requesting them in writing or by telephone from Legacy at the following address:

Legacy Bancorp, Inc.
99 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
Attention: Paul Bruce, Investor Relations
Telephone: (413) 445-3513

If you would like to request documents from Legacy, please do so by, to receive them before Legacy’s meeting of stockholders. If you request any incorporated documents, Legacy will mail them to you by first-class mail, or other equally prompt means, within one business day of its receipt of your request.

Legacy incorporates by reference additional documents that it may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission between the date of this document and the date of the special meetings. These documents include periodic reports, such as annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K (other than information furnished under Items 2.02 or 7.01 of Form 8-K), as well as proxy statements.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. has supplied all information contained in this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus relating to Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., and Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy has supplied all information relating to Rome Bancorp, Inc.


TABLE OF CONTENTSLegacy.

You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus when evaluating the merger agreementMerger Agreement and the proposed merger.Merger. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. This proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is dated ____________.. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is accurate as of any date other than such date, and neither the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus to stockholders of Rome Bancorp, Inc.Legacy or Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. nor the issuance of shares of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. common stock as contemplated by the merger agreementMerger Agreement shall create any implication to the contrary.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
(in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

  
 September 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
Assets
          
Cash and due from banks $6,966  $6,547 
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments  9,032   1,027 
Total cash and cash equivalents  15,998   7,574 
Securities available for sale, at fair value  13,336   10,024 
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $1,475 and $1,502 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)  1,419   1,431 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock  3,310   3,222 
Loans  277,833   287,749 
Less: Allowance for loan loss  (2,595  (2,132
Net loans  275,238   285,617 
Premises and equipment, net  5,925   6,041 
Accrued interest receivable  1,122   1,117 
Bank-owned life insurance  9,709   9,415 
Other assets  5,550   5,481 
Total assets $331,607  $329,922 
Liabilities & Equity
          
Liabilities
          
Deposits:
          
Non-interest bearing $36,485  $31,790 
Savings  85,405   82,031 
Money market  19,938   15,726 
Time  69,651   71,903 
Other interest bearing  15,398   15,189 
Total deposits  226,877   216,639 
Borrowings  37,873   47,869 
Other liabilities  5,038   5,049 
Total liabilities  269,788   269,557 
Shareholders’ equity
          
Common Stock, $.01 par value; authorized: 30,000,000 shares; issued: 9,895,757; outstanding 6,777,551 and 6,800,119 shares at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively  99   99 
Additional paid-in capital  63,065   62,794 
Retained earnings  38,509   37,588 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (1,275  (1,574
Treasury stock; 3,118,206 shares at September 30, 2010 and 3,095,638 shares at December 31, 2009  (36,921  (36,720
Unallocated shares of employee stock ownership plan (ESOP): 243,802 and 278,275 shares at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009  (1,658  (1,822
Total shareholders’ equity  61,819   60,365 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $331,607  $329,922 



See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)

For the three months ended
September 30,
For the nine months ended
September 30,
2010200920102009
Interest income:
Loans$4,007$4,148$12,125$12,626
Securities179157509362
Other short-term investments3438
Total interest income4,1894,30912,63712,996
Interest expense:
Deposits4545861,3981,900
Borrowings2994669021,359
Total interest expense7531,0522,3003,259
Net interest income3,4363,25710,3379,737
Provision for loan losses75540200
Net interest income after provision for loan losses3,3613,2579,7979,537
Non-interest income:
Gain on sales of securities352615626
Gain on sale of real estate418
Other7736391,9971,806
Total non-interest income8086652,5711,832
Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits1,5671,4974,6454,594
Building, occupancy and equipment4874651,4531,434
Other9535922,3191,982
Total non-interest expense3,0072,5548,4178,010
Income before income tax expense1,1621,3683,9513,359
Income tax expense3244601,2721,096
Net income$838$908$2,679$2,263
Basic earnings per share$0.13$0.14$0.41$0.34
Diluted earnings per share$0.13$0.14$0.41$0.34



See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except share and per share data)(unaudited)

       
 Common
stock
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
earnings
 Treasury
Stock
 Accumulated
other
comprehensive
Income (loss)
 Unallocated
ESOP
shares
 Total
Balances at January 1, 2009 $99  $62,440  $36,721  $(34,662 $(2,212 $(2,042 $60,344 
Comprehensive income:
                                   
Net Income        2,263            2,263 
Other comprehensive income              300      300 
Total comprehensive income                    2,563 
Purchase of 181,588 treasury shares           (1,408        (1,408
Stock-based compensation     120               120 
Dividends ($0.255 per share)        (1,688           (1,688
ESOP shares released for allocation (34,473 shares)     124            165   289 
Balances at September 30, 2009 $99  $62,684  $37,296  $(36,070 $(1,912 $(1,877 $60,220 
Balances at January 1, 2010 $99  $62,794  $37,588  $(36,720 $(1,574 $(1,822 $60,365 
Comprehensive income:
                                   
Net Income        2,679            2,679 
Other comprehensive income              299      299 
Total comprehensive income                    2,978 
Purchase of 22,568 treasury shares           (201        (201
Amortization and tax effect of Stock-based compensation     130               130 
Dividends ($0.27 per share)        (1,758           (1,758
ESOP shares released for allocation (34,473 shares)     141            164   305 
Balances at September 30, 2010 $99  $63,065  $38,509  $(36,921 $(1,275 $(1,658 $61,819 



See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited) (in thousands)

  
 2010 2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
          
Net income $2,679  $2,263 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
Provided by operating activities:
          
Depreciation and amortization  364   385 
Increase in accrued interest receivable  (5  (1
Provision for loan losses  540   200 
Net amortization on securities  87   (2
Proceeds from sales of loans  14,345   7,325 
Net gain on loans sold  (291  (119
Originations of loans held for sale  (14,054  (7,206
Gain on sale of real estate owned  (410  (2
Gain on securities transactions  (156  (26
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities  (11  468 
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance  (294  (306
Increase (decrease) in other assets  192   (145
Allocation of ESOP shares  305   289 
Amortization of unearned stock-based compensation  171   171 
Net cash provided by operating activities  3,462   3,294 
Cash flows from investing activities:
          
Net decrease in loans  9,774   12,572 
Proceeds from maturities and principal reductions of securities available for sale  1,198   1,149 
Purchases of securities available for sale  (5,390  (7,177
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale  1,221   470 
(Purchase) redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock  (88  123 
Proceeds from maturities and principal reductions of securities held to maturity  7   7 
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned  205   525 
Additions to premises and equipment  (248  (129
Net cash provided by investing activities  6,679   7,540 
Cash flows from financing activities:
          
(Decrease) increase in time deposits  (2,252  207 
Increase in other deposits  12,490   10,283 
Repayments of borrowings  (24,871  (24,304
Additional borrowings  14,875   13,619 
Purchase of treasury stock  (201  (1,408
Dividends paid  (1,758  (1,688
Net cash used in financing activities  (1,717  (3,291
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  8,424   7,543 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  7,574   9,579 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $15,998  $17,122 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows continued on next page.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited) (in thousands)

  
 2010 2009
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
          
Non-cash investing activities:
          
Transfers from loans to other real estate $65  $192 
Cash paid during the period for:
          
Interest  2,327   3,227 
Income taxes  1,750   719 



See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(1)The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (“Rome Bancorp” or the “Company”) and The Rome Savings Bank (the “Bank”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all necessary adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented.

The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading; however, the results of operations and other data presented for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire fiscal year. Management has evaluated all significant events and transactions that occurred through the financial statement issuance date for potential recognition or disclosure in these condensed consolidated financial statements.

The data in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was derived from the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. That data, along with the interim financial information presented in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, statements of income, statements of shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and statements of cash flows should be read in conjunction with the 2009 consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Amounts in the prior period’s consolidated financial statements are reclassified when necessary to conform with the current period’s presentation.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(2)  Earnings per Common Share

The Company has stock compensation awards with non-forfeitable dividend rights which are considered participating securities. The effect of including these participating securities in earnings per share computations is immaterial. ESOP shares are considered outstanding for this calculation unless unearned. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares from stock-based compensation plans.

The following summarizes the computation of earnings per share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

(in thousands, except per share data)

    
 Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
   2010 2009 2010 2009
Basic earnings per share:
                    
Net Income $838  $908  $2,679  $2,263 
Weighted average common shares outstanding  6,781   6,879   6,787   6,917 
Less: Average unallocated ESOP shares  (255  (301  (267  (313
Average basic shares  6,526   6,578   6,520   6,604 
Basic earnings per share $0.13  $0.14  $0.41  $0.34 
Diluted earnings per share:
                    
Net income $838  $908  $2,679  $2,263 
Weighted average basic shares outstanding  6,526   6,578   6,520   6,604 
Effect of dilutive securities            
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding  6,526   6,578   6,520   6,604 
Diluted earnings per share $0.13  $0.14  $0.41  $0.34 

Stock options for 354,000 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 because they were antidilutive.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(3)  Other Comprehensive Income

    
 Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
   (in thousands)
   2010 2009 2010 2009
Pension and postretirement adjustments $76  $94  $232  $282 
Net change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities arising during the period  225   180   422   244 
Reclassification adjustment for net realized gain included in net income  (35  (26  (156  (26
Other comprehensive income, before tax  266   248   498   500 
Deferred tax effect  (106  (99  (199  (200
Other comprehensive income  160   149   299   300 
Net income  838   908   2,679   2,263 
Total comprehensive income $998  $1,057  $2,978  $2,563 

(4)  Securities

Securities are summarized as follows (In thousands):

    
 September 30, 2010
   Amortized
Cost
 Gross
unrealized
gains
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
Available-for-sale:
                    
State and municipal obligations $1,670  $164  $  $1,834 
Corporate obligations  10,709   358   1   11,066��
Total debt securities  12,379   522   1   12,900 
Equity and other securities  430   6      436 
   $12,809  $528  $1  $13,336 
Held-to-maturity:
                    
U.S. Government securities $1,310  $56  $  $1,366 
Other bonds  109         109 
   $1,419  $56  $  $1,475 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(4)  Securities  – (continued)

    
 December 31, 2009
   Amortized
Cost
 Gross
unrealized
gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
value
Available-for-sale:
                    
State and municipal
obligations
 $2,294  $119  $  $2,413 
Corporate obligations  6,597   85   39   6,643 
Total debt securities  8,891   204   39   9,056 
Equity and other securities  872   96      968 
   $9,763  $300  $39  $10,024 
Held-to-maturity:
                    
U.S. Government securities $1,316  $71  $  $1,387 
Mortgage-backed securities
                    
GNMA  1         1 
Other bonds  114         114 
   $1,431  $71  $  $1,502 

All of the gross unrealized losses on available for sale securities at both September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were less than one year in duration. The detail of these losses and the carrying value (at estimated fair value) of the underlying securities available for sale are summarized below (in thousands):

    
 September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009
   Unrealized
Loss
 Carrying
Value
 Unrealized
Loss
 Carrying
Value
One year or less:
                    
Corporate obligations $  1  $415  $39  $2,891 
Total $  1  $415  $39  $2,891 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(4)  Securities  – (continued)

Management evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. There were no investments deemed by management to be other than temporarily impaired at September 30, 2010.

The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of debt securities based on the contractual maturity date (in thousands). Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties.

  
 September 30, 2010
   Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Available-for-sale:
          
Due within one year $1,008  $1,015 
Due after one year through five years  9,130   9,528 
Due after five years through ten years  2,241   2,357 
Due after 10 years      
   $12,379  $12,900 
Held-to-maturity:
          
Due within one year $  $ 
Due after one year through five years  1,310   1,366 
Due after five years through ten years      
Due after ten years  109   109 
   $1,419  $1,475 

Securities pledged at both September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 had a carrying amount of $1.3 million. These securities collateralize state and Treasury department programs. As of these dates, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity.

(5)  Loans

Loans are summarized as follows:

  
 September 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
   (in thousands)
Mortgage loans:
          
Residential (1 – 4 family) $148,261  $155,547 
Commercial  50,401   52,557 
Construction and land  3,893   4,381 
Total Mortgage loans  202,555   212,485 
Other loans:
          
Commercial  30,477   30,429 
Automobile loans  8,030   9,377 
Property improvement and equipment  22,290   19,251 
Other consumer  14,481   16,207 
Total Other loans  75,278   75,264 
Total Loans $277,833  $287,749 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(5)  Loans  – (continued)

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:

    
 Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
   (in thousands)
   2010 2009 2010 2009
Balance at beginning of period $2,523  $2,105  $2,132  $1,936 
Provision charged to operations  75      540   200 
Loans charged off  (18  (39  (130  (103
Recoveries  15   16   53   49 
Balance at end of period $2,595  $2,082  $2,595  $2,082 

The Company’s recorded investment in loans that are considered impaired totaled $2.6 million and $698,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These impaired loans carried allowances of $763,000 and $242,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $2.0 million and $705,000 in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company recognized interest of $21,000 and $0 on impaired loans that were in compliance with all lending terms during the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Interest recognized on impaired loans that were in compliance with all lending terms during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $63,000 and $0 respectively.

The principal balances of loans not accruing interest, including consumer, real estate, mortgage and other loans not subject to impairment disclosures amounted to $1.9 million at both September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Company held loans 90 days past due and accruing interest totaling $186,000 and $43,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The differences between the amount of interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been paid in accordance with their original terms and the amount of interest income that was recorded during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $14,300 and $58,800, respectively. There are no commitments to extend further credit on non-accruing loans.

Included in the Company’s classified assets at September 30, 2010 is a loan relationship comprised of three loans to the same borrower, which are part of a larger loan participation arrangement with other banks. The Company’s portion of the arrangement totaled $4.6 million at September 30, 2010. The loans are secured by first and second mortgages on property held for development and several other unrelated properties. Due to the current economic climate, the borrower has been unable to develop the commercial real estate for sale in a timely fashion. This commercial credit was performing in accordance with contractual terms as of September 30, 2010 and was therefore accruing interest as of such date. However, management is uncertain as to the current and continued sources of debt service. Accordingly the Company has designated one of the loans as impaired. The loss related to this relationship could change if new information becomes available in future periods. Management is actively monitoring this credit and its associated collateral value.

In addition to the impaired and non-performing loans, management has identified, through normal internal credit review procedures, $13.5 million in “potential problem loans” at September 30, 2010. Payments are current on $12.2 million or 90.4% of these loans. These problem loans are defined as loans not included as non-performing loans, but about which management has developed information regarding possible credit problems, which may cause the borrowers future difficulties in complying with loan repayments. The Company will continue to be aggressive in identifying, monitoring and resolving potential problem loans.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(5)  Loans  – (continued)

A substantial portion of the Company’s loans are mortgage and consumer loans in Oneida County. Accordingly, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in market conditions in this area. A majority of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by real estate. Other than general economic risks, management is not aware of any material concentrations of credit risk to any industry or individual borrower. The Company does not originate sub-prime mortgage loans and has not purchased investments collateralized by sub-prime loans.

(6)  Stock-Based Compensation

On May 24, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors issued 354,000 stock options to directors and key employees with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock on that day. These options have a ten year life and vest ratably over a five year period or in certain cases upon retirement. At May 24, 2006, certain awardees met the retirement eligibility criteria and accordingly, stock-based compensation expense of $350,000 related to their options was expensed immediately. As of September 30, 2010, unrecognized compensation cost related to these options was $33,000. This expense is being amortized on a straight line basis over the remainder of the ninety month vesting period of the options.

Following is a summary of the Company’s 2010 year to date stock option activity:

   
 Nine Months ended
September 30, 2010
   Shares Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 Weighted
Average
Fair Value
Options outstanding, beginning of period  354,000  $12.84  $1.69 
Exercised         
Granted         
Options outstanding at end of period  354,000  $12.84  $1.69 
Options exercisable at end of period  283,200  $12.84  $1.69 

The aggregate intrinsic value of all options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2010 was $0. No stock options were exercised during the quarters ended September 30, 2010 or 2009. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was $0 and $18,000, respectively.

On May 24, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors awarded 168,300 shares of restricted stock to directors and certain key employees. These shares vest to the recipients ratably over a five year period, or in certain cases upon retirement and the related unrecognized compensation cost related to this grant will be expensed over the same period. At May 24, 2006, certain awardees met the retirement eligibility criteria and accordingly, stock-based compensation expense of $1.1 million related to their 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan (RRP) awards was expensed immediately. At September 30, 2010, the unrecognized compensation cost attributable to restricted stock awards was $119,000. The aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock that is expected to vest in the future was $314,000 at September 30, 2010.

For both of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans was $13,000 and $38,000, respectively. For both of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 compensation cost related to the restricted stock plan was $44,000 and $134,000, respectively.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(6)  Stock-Based Compensation  – (continued)

During the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, dividends of $3,000 and $6,000, respectively, were paid on unvested shares with non-forfeitable dividend rights. During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, dividends of $15,000 and $23,000, respectively, were paid on unvested shares with non-forfeitable dividend rights. These dividend amounts were not included in net income as compensation expense due to the expectation that all of the awards will vest.

(7)  Pension and Postretirement Medical Benefit Expenses

The components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost consisted of the following:

    
 Three months ended September 30,
   (in thousands)
   Pension benefits Postretirement benefits
   2010 2009 2010 2009
Components of net periodic pension cost:
                    
Service cost $  $  $4  $5 
Interest cost  88   87   34   37 
Expected return on plan assets  (115  (108      
Amortization  81   96   (4  (2
Net periodic pension cost $54  $75  $34  $40 

    
 Nine months ended September 30,
   (in thousands)
   Pension benefits Postretirement benefits
   2010 2009 2010 2009
Components of net periodic pension cost:
                    
Service cost $  $  $12  $15 
Interest cost  264   261   102   111 
Expected return on plan assets  (345  (324      
Amortization  243   288   (12  (6
Net periodic pension cost $162  $225  $102  $120 

In December of 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the defined benefit pension plan to cease the accrual of further benefits. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Company expects to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plan.

(8)  Fair Value Measurement

The FASB ASC Topic 820, “Financial Instruments,” requires the disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments. Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable.

Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2 — Significant other observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(8)  Fair Value Measurement  – (continued)

Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an instrument.

The Company is responsible for the valuation process and as part of this process may use data from outside sources in establishing fair value. The Company performs due diligence to understand the inputs used or how the data was calculated or derived. The Company corroborates the reasonableness of external inputs in the valuation process.

To estimate the fair value of its available for sale securities portfolio, the Company obtains current market pricing from quoted market sources or if such quoted sources are not available, current market pricing. The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands of dollars).

    
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets
measured at
fair value
September 30, 2010
                    
Available for sale securities:
                    
State and municipal obligations $  $1,834  $  $1,834 
Corporate obligations     11,066      11,066 
Equity and other obligations  36   400      436 
December 31, 2009
                    
Available for sale securities:
                    
State and municipal obligations $   2,413      2,413 
Corporate obligations     6,643      6,643 
Equity and other obligations  568   400      968 

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands of dollars).

    
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets
measured at
fair value
September 30, 2010
                    
Impaired loans $  $  $1,865  $1,865 
December 31, 2009
                    
Impaired loans $  $  $456  $456 

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a cost basis of $2.6 million and $698,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These loans carried a valuation allowance of $763,000 and $242,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. These loans required additions to the provision for loan losses of $18,000 and $526,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010. No additional provision for loan losses was required during the same periods of 2009.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(8)  Fair Value Measurement  – (continued)

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents:  For these short-term instruments that generally mature in ninety days or less, the carrying value approximates fair value.

Securities:  The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or if unavailable, current market pricing or by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock:  It is not practicable to determine the value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.

Loans:  The fair values of impaired loans are estimated as discussed previously. The fair values for all other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit rating. The Company has not considered market illiquidity in estimating the fair value of loans due to uncertain and inconsistent market pricing being experienced at measurement date.

Accrued Interest:  The fair value of accrued interest receivable and payable approximates carrying value.

Deposits:  The fair values of demand deposits (interest and non-interest checking) savings accounts and money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on these products to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Borrowings:  Fair values of long-term borrowings are estimated using a discounted cash flow approach, based on current market rates for similar borrowings.

Off-balance-sheet instruments:  Fair values for the Company’s off-balance-sheet instruments (lines of credit and commitments to fund loans) are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair value of these financial instruments is immaterial and has therefore been excluded from the table below.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(8)  Fair Value Measurement  – (continued)

The estimated carrying values and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments for September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

    
 September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009
   Carrying
amount
 Fair
value
 Carrying
amount
 Fair
value
Financial assets:
                    
Cash and cash equivalents $15,998  $15,998  $7,574  $7,574 
Securities available for sale  13,336   13,336   10,024   10,024 
Securities held to maturity  1,419   1,475   1,431   1,502 
Loans, net  275,238   282,188   285,617   288,524 
Accrued interest receivable  1,122   1,122   1,117   1,117 
Financial liabilities:
                    
Non-interest bearing deposits  36,485   36,485   31,790   31,790 
Interest bearing deposits  190,392   190,667   184,849   185,320 
Borrowings  37,873   39,299   47,869   48,342 
Accrued interest payable  100   100   127   127 

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

(9)  Subsequent Events

On October 12, 2010, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., the parent company of Berkshire Bank, and the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which the Company will merge with and into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. in a transaction valued at approximately $74 million. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, 70% of the outstanding shares of Rome common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.5658 shares of Berkshire common stock for each share of Rome and the remaining 30% of outstanding shares of Rome will be exchanged for $11.25 in cash. Rome stockholders will have the right to elect to receive cash or Berkshire common stock as outlined above, subject to 70% of Rome common stock receiving Berkshire common stock and the proration procedures contained in the Merger Agreement. Concurrent with the merger, it is expected that the Bank will merge with and into Berkshire Bank. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and approval by the shareholders of the Company, and is currently expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2011. The directors and executive officers of Rome have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the approval of the Merger Agreement at the stockholders meeting to be held to vote on the proposed transaction. If the merger is not consummated under certain circumstances, Rome has agreed to pay Berkshire a termination fee of $3.5 million.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Rome Bancorp, Inc.
Rome, New York

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related statements of income, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Crowe Horwath LLP
Crowe Horwath LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
March 10, 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except share data)

  
 2009 2008
Assets
          
Cash and due from banks $6,547  $6,823 
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments  1,027   2,756 
Total cash and cash equivalents  7,574   9,579 
Securities available for sale, at fair value  10,024   3,563 
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $1,502 and $1,561 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively)  1,431   1,447 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock  3,222   3,578 
Loans  287,749   300,389 
Less: Allowance for loan losses  (2,132  (1,936
Net loans  285,617   298,453 
Premises and equipment, net  6,041   6,372 
Accrued interest receivable  1,117   1,085 
Bank-owned life insurance  9,415   9,006 
Other assets  5,481   4,803 
Total assets $329,922  $337,886 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
          
Liabilities:
          
Deposits:
          
Non-interest bearing $31,790  $28,373 
Savings  82,031   79,221 
Money market  15,726   11,996 
Time  71,903   72,138 
Other interest bearing  15,189   14,204 
Total deposits  216,639   205,932 
Federal home Loan Bank advances  47,869   66,324 
Other liabilities  5,049   5,286 
Total liabilities  269,557   277,542 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)      
Shareholders’ equity:
          
Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; issued: 9,895,757 shares; outstanding: 6,800,119 shares at December 31, 2009; issued: 9,893,716 shares; outstanding: 7,058,866 shares at December 31, 2008  99   99 
Additional paid-in capital  62,794   62,440 
Retained earnings  37,588   36,721 
Treasury stock, at cost; 3,095,638 and 2,834,850 shares at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively  (36,720  (34,662
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  (1,574  (2,212
Unallocated shares of employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) 278,275 and 324,239 shares at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively  (1,822  (2,042
Total shareholders’ equity  60,365   60,344 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $329,922  $337,886 



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Income
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(In thousands, except share data)

   
 2009 2008 2007
Interest income:
               
Loans $16,763  $17,561  $17,481 
Securities  517   367   386 
Other short-term investments  11   26   52 
Total interest income  17,291   17,954   17,919 
Interest expense:
               
Deposits  2,426   3,342   3,492 
Borrowings  1,824   1,545   1,306 
Total interest expense  4,250   4,887   4,798 
Net interest income  13,041   13,067   13,121 
Provision for loan losses  300   300   50 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  12,741   12,767   13,071 
Non-interest income:
               
Service charges  1,815   1,706   1,654 
Net gain (loss) on securities  73   (265  11 
Earnings on bank owned life insurance  409   408   383 
Other income  225   95   115 
Total non-interest income  2,522   1,944   2,163 
Non-interest expense:
               
Salaries and employee benefits  6,143   5,733   5,887 
Building, occupancy and equipment  1,918   1,903   1,896 
FDIC and OTS assessments  416   140   114 
Outside consulting and professional fees  421   580   712 
ATM service fees  251   236   236 
Other  1,540   1,818   1,727 
Total non-interest expense  10,689   10,410   10,572 
Income before income tax expense  4,574   4,301   4,662 
Income tax expense  1,487   1,396   1,608 
Net income $3,087  $2,905  $3,054 
Basic earnings per share $0.47  $0.42  $0.39 
Diluted earnings per share $0.47  $0.41  $0.39 



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(In thousands, except share data)

       
       
 Common
Stock
 Additional
paid-in
capital
 Retained
earnings
 Treasury
Stock
 Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 Unallocated
ESOP
shares
 Total
Balances at December 31, 2006 $97  $60,712  $35,643  $(16,307 $(633 $(2,481 $77,031 
Comprehensive income:
                                   
Net income        3,054            3,054 
Other comprehensive income              257      257 
Total comprehensive income                                3,311 
Purchase of 838,100 treasury shares           (10,181        (10,181
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit 164,943 shares, net  2   510               512 
Amortization and tax benefits of stock option and restricted share grants       325                       325 
Dividends paid ($0.32 per share)        (2,518           (2,518
ESOP shares released for allocation (45,967 shares)     337            220   557 
Balances at December 31, 2007  99   61,884   36,179   (26,488  (376  (2,261  69,037 
Comprehensive income:
                                   
Net income        2,905            2,905 
Other comprehensive loss              (1,836     (1,836
Total comprehensive income                                1,069 
Purchase of 731,750 treasury shares           (8,174        (8,174
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit 2,201 shares, net                     
Amortization and tax benefits of stock option and restricted share grants     280               280 
Dividends paid ($0.34 per share)        (2,387           (2,387
ESOP shares released for allocation (45,965 shares)     276            219   495 
Adjustment to initially apply pension guidance, net of tax (Note 9)        24            24 
Balances at December 31, 2008  99   62,440   36,721   (34,662  (2,212  (2,042  60,344 
Comprehensive income:
                                   
Net income        3,087            3,087 
Other comprehensive income              638      638 
Total comprehensive income                                3,725 
Purchase of 260,788 treasury shares           (2,058        (2,058
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit 2,041 shares, net                     
Amortization and tax benefits of stock option and restricted share grants     190               190 
Dividends paid ($0.34 per share)        (2,220           (2,220
ESOP shares released for allocation (45,964 shares)     164            220   384 
Balances at December 31, 2009 $99  $62,794  $37,588  $(36,720 $(1,574 $(1,822 $60,365 



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(In thousands)

   
 2009 2008 2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income $3,087  $2,905  $3,054 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation  513   563   587 
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable  (32  39   (30
Provision for loan losses  300   300   50 
Net loss on other than temporary securities impairment     265    
Net gains on securities transactions  (73     (11
Gain on sales of loans  (155  (17  (18
Proceeds from sale of loans  11,173   1,180   1,509 
Origination of loans for sale  (11,018  (1,163  (1,491
Net accretion (amortization) on securities  7   3   (5
Increase in cash surrender value of Bank-owned life insurance  (409  (408  (383
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate  (2  18    
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities  (237  (3,527  178 
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense  (107  126   (37
(Increase) decrease in other assets  (526  3,122   (65
Allocation of ESOP shares  384   495   557 
Amortization of stock-based compensation  228   280   313 
Net cash provided by operating activities  3,133   4,181   4,208 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Net decrease (increase) in loans  12,344   (18,216  (18,572
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale  1,314      357 
Proceeds from maturities and principal reductions of securities available for sale  349   921   1,209 
Purchases of securities available for sale  (7,477  (3,244  (1,000
Purchases of securities held to maturity     (326   
Proceeds from maturities and principal reductions of securities held to maturity  9   23   34 
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned  525   253    
Purchases of premises and equipment, net  (176  (361  (1,077
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  6,888   (20,950  (19,049
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
(Decrease) increase in time deposits  (235  (1,071  6,808 
Increase in other deposits  10,942   3,971   219 
Repayments of borrowings  (33,409  (12,709  (3,239
Advances on borrowings  14,954   38,700   23,400 
Purchase of treasury stock  (2,058  (8,174  (10,181
Dividends  (2,220  (2,387  (2,518
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefits        512 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (12,026  18,330   15,001 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (2,005  1,561   160 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  9,579   8,018   7,858 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $7,574  $9,579  $8,018 

(Continued)



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — (continued)
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(In thousands)

   
 2009 2008 2007
Other non-cash activities:
               
Transfers from loans to real estate owned $192  $505  $52 
Cash paid during the year for:
               
Interest  4,244   4,795   4,802 
Income taxes  1,097   1,514   1,056 



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(1)  Business

Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a registered savings and loan holding company, organized under the laws of Delaware and is the parent company of The Rome Savings Bank and its subsidiaries (“Rome Savings” or the “Bank”). The Company provides traditional community banking services for individuals and small-to medium-sized businesses, through the Bank’s five branches in Oneida County of New York State.

(2)  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a)Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Amounts in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements are reclassified when necessary to conform with the current year’s presentation. A description of the significant accounting policies is presented below. To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. generally accepted accounting principles), management makes estimates and assumptions based on the available information. Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the period. Significant estimates include the allowance for loan losses, valuation of securities, deferred tax assets and employee benefit obligations. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Rome Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

(b)Securities

The Company classifies its debt securities as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity as the Company does not hold any securities considered to be trading. Held-to-maturity securities are those debt securities the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All other debt securities are classified as available for sale. Equity securities with readily determinable fair values are classified as available for sale.

Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related deferred tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of shareholders’ equity, until realized.

Management evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.

Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment to yield using the interest method. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned on the accrual method. Purchases and sales are recorded on a trade date basis with settlement occurring shortly thereafter. Realized gains and losses on securities sold are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(2)  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

(c)Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Stock

The Bank is a member of the FHLB system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. FHLB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

(d)Loans

Loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding net of loans in process, net deferred loan fees and costs and an allowance for loan losses. Origination fees and certain direct origination costs related to lending activities are deferred and amortized over the life of the related loans. The Company has the ability and intent to hold its loans for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff.

Interest on loans is accrued and included in income at contractual rates applied to principal outstanding. The accrual of interest on loans (including impaired loans) is generally discontinued, and previously accrued interest is reversed, when loan payments are 90 days or more past due, or when, by the judgment of management, collectibility becomes uncertain. Subsequent recognition of income occurs only to the extent that payment is received. Loans are generally returned to an accrual status when both principal and interest become current and the loan is determined to be performing in accordance with the applicable loan terms.

Most of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within Oneida County, New York. Therefore, the Company’s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in the economy in the Oneida County area.

(e)Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses charged to operations and is decreased by the charge-off of loans, net of recoveries. Loans are charged off when management determines that ultimate success of the loan’s collectibility is remote.

Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance considers the Company’s historical loan loss experience, review of specific loans, current economic conditions and such other factors considered appropriate to estimate losses. Management uses presently available information to estimate probable losses on loans; however, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in estimates, assumptions or economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired or loans otherwise classified as substandard or doubtful. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a quarterly basis by management in order to maintain the allowance at a level sufficient to absorb probable incurred loan losses based upon known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(2)  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

The Company estimates losses on impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows (discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate) or the fair value of the underlying collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An impairment loss exists if the recorded investment in a loan exceeds the value of the loan as measured by the aforementioned methods. Impairment losses are included as a component of the allowance for loan losses. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Generally, all commercial mortgage loans and commercial loans greater than $250,000 in a non-accrual status are considered impaired. Commercial mortgage loans and commercial loans less than $250,000 and all residential mortgage loans, consumer loans and education loans are evaluated collectively by portfolio since they are homogeneous and generally carry smaller individual balances. The Company recognizes interest income on impaired loans using the cash basis of income recognition. Cash receipts on impaired loans are generally applied according to the terms of the loan agreement, or as a reduction of principal, based upon management’s judgment and the related factors discussed above.

(f)Real Estate Owned

Real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell. Write-downs from cost to fair value which are required at the time of foreclosure are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Adjustments to the carrying value of such properties that result from subsequent declines in value are charged to operations in the period in which the declines occur. Operating costs associated with the properties are charged to expense as incurred.

(g)Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost and buildings and improvements and furniture and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (7 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment).

(h)Employee Benefit Plans

The Company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan that covers approximately 50% of all current full time employees. The Company’s Board of Directors amended the plan in December of 2002 to cease the accrual of any further benefits. The benefits under the pension plan are based on the employee’s years of service and compensation. Pension expense is the net of service cost and interest cost, return on plan assets and amortization of gains and losses not immediately recognized. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute annually at least the minimum required to meet the funding standards set forth under provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

The Company provides health care and life insurance benefits to certain retired full time employees. The estimated costs of providing benefits are accrued over the years the employees render services necessary to earn those benefits.

The Company has a defined contribution 401(k) Savings Plan for all employees. Employees are permitted to contribute up to 75% of base pay to the Savings Plan, subject to certain limitations. The Company matches 50% of each employee’s contributions up to a limit of 3% of the employee’s base pay.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(2)  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

The Company also sponsors a non-contributory Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) covering substantially all full time employees. The number of shares allocable to participants of the Plan is determined by the Board of Directors. Allocations to individual participant accounts are based on participant compensation. As shares are committed to be released to participants, the Company reports compensation expense equal to the current market price of the shares and the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations. Dividends on allocated shares reduce retained earnings; dividends on unallocated ESOP shares reduce debt and accrued interest.

(i)Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future amounts attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted guidance issued by the FASB with respect to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes as of January 1, 2007. a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The effect of adopting this guidance was not material.

(j)Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, and federal funds sold which represents short-term highly liquid investments. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds purchased agreements.

(k)Financial Instruments With Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments are limited to commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The Company’s policy is to record such instruments when funded.

(l)Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. ESOP shares are considered outstanding for this calculation unless unearned. All outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities for this calculation. Diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options. Earnings and dividends per share are restated for all stock splits and stock dividends through the date of issuance of the financial statements.

(m)Segment Reporting

The Company’s operations are solely in the financial services industry providing traditional community banking services in the geographical region of Oneida County and surrounding areas in New York State. While revenue streams and costs of various products and services are monitored, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has no reportable business segments.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(2)  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

(n)Bank Owned Life Insurance

The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain key officers and employees. Company owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

(o) Stock-based compensation

Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock awards issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award

(p)Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy about the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. The guidance became effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued guidance that delayed the effective date of this fair value guidance for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The effect of adopting this new guidance was immaterial to the Company.

In June 2009, the FASB replaced The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, with theFASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (The Codification) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification was effective for financial statements issued for periods ending after September 15, 2009.

In June 2008, the FASB issued guidance which addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. This guidance was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The adoption of this new guidance and the effect on earnings per share has been presented in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2008, the FASB issued guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other post-retirement plan. These additional disclosures include disclosure of investment policies and fair value disclosures of plan assets, including fair value hierarchy. This guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Upon initial application,


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(2)  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

provisions of the FSP are not required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative purposes. The new disclosures have been presented in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB amended existing guidance for determining whether impairment is other-than-temporary for debt securities. The guidance requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income and 2) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. Additionally, disclosures about other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities were expanded. This guidance was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early-adopt this guidance as of March 31, 2009. Adoption of this new guidance was immaterial to the Company.

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that emphasizes that the objective of a fair value measurement does not change even when market activity for the asset or liability has decreased significantly. Fair value is the price that would be received for an asset sold or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. When observable transactions or quoted prices are not considered orderly, then little, if any, weight should be assigned to the indication of the asset or liability’s fair value. Adjustments to those transactions or prices should be applied to determine the appropriate fair value. The guidance, which was applied prospectively, was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 early adoption for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The effect of adopting this new guidance was not material to the Company.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(3)  Securities

Securities are summarized as follows (In thousands):

    
 December 31, 2009
   Amortized
Cost
 Gross
unrealized
gains
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
Available-for-sale:
                    
State and municipal obligations $2,294  $119  $  $2,413 
Corporate bonds  6,597   85   39   6,643 
Total debt securities  8,891   204   39   9,056 
Equity and other securities  872   96      968 
   $9,763  $300  $39  $10,024 
Held-to-maturity:
                    
U.S. Government securities $1,316  $71  $  $1,387 
Mortgage-backed securities-residential:
                    
GNMA  1         1 
Other bonds  114         114 
   $1,431  $71  $  $1,502 

    
 December 31, 2008
   Amortized
Cost
 Gross
unrealized
gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
value
Available-for-sale:
                    
State and municipal obligations $2,620  $52  $9  $2,663 
Mortgage-backed securities – residential:
                    
FNMA  4         4 
FHLMC  24         24 
Total debt securities  2,648   52   9   2,691 
Equity and other securities  872         872 
   $3,520  $52  $9  $3,563 
Held-to-maturity:
                    
U.S. Government securities $1,322  $114  $  $1,436 
Mortgage-backed securities-residential:
                    
GNMA  7         7 
Other bonds  118         118 
   $1,447  $114  $  $1,561 

The investment securities shown above with unrealized losses at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were in a continuous loss position for less than 12 months.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company’s security portfolio consisted of 42 securities, 8 of which were in an unrealized loss position. All of unrealized losses are related to the Company’s corporate bond


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(3)  Securities  – (continued)

portfolio. These bonds are of high credit quality (rated A or higher.) The fair value is expected to recover as the bond(s) approach maturity. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and current market conditions, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2009.

Included in the Company’s equity securities is an investment in a mutual fund which purchases blue chip common stocks. The downturn in the equity markets during 2008 caused a decrease in the market value of such fund. During the fourth quarter of 2008, in connection with its ongoing review of long term asset values, the Company determined that this investment had been other than temporarily impaired, as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $265,000 (pre-tax) was recorded to lower the carrying value of this security to then current fair market value of $472,000. This charge reduced 2008 net earnings by $162,000, net of tax, or $0.02 per diluted share. As this investment is classified as an available for sale security, shareholders’ equity had already been reduced by the amount of the unrealized loss, net of taxes. The “other than temporary” write-down does not necessarily mean that the value has been permanently lost. The fair market value of the security may increase or decrease on a going forward basis. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s investment in this equity fund had an unrealized gain of $96,000.

The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of debt securities based on the contractual maturity date (in thousands). Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties.

  
 December 31, 2009
   Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Available-for-sale:
          
Due within one year $1,199  $1,200 
Due after one year through five years  6,401   6,493 
Due after five years through ten years  1,291   1,363 
Due after ten years      
   $8,891  $9,056 
Held-to-maturity:
          
Due within one year $1  $1 
Due after one year through five years  1,316   1,387 
Due after five years through ten years      
Due after ten years  114   114 
   $1,431  $1,502 

Gross gains of $73,000, $0 and $11,000 were realized on sales of securities in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The tax provision related to these realized gains was $29,000, $0 and $4,000, respectively.

Securities pledged at both year ends 2009 and 2008 had a carrying amount of $1.3 million. These securities collateralize state and Treasury department programs. At year end 2009 and 2008, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(4)  Loans

Loans are summarized as follows (in thousands) at December 31:

  
 2009 2008
Mortgage loans:
          
Residential (1 – 4 family) $155,547  $170,197 
Commercial  52,557   49,231 
Construction and land  4,381   5,827 
Total Mortgage loans  212,485   225,255 
Other loans:
          
Commercial  30,429   28,472 
Automobile loans  9,377   12,927 
Property improvement and equipment  19,251   17,459 
Other consumer  16,207   16,276 
Total Other loans  75,264   75,134 
Total Loans $287,749  $300,389 

The Company serviced loans for third parties totaling $18,101,000 and $7,138,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows (in thousands):

   
 Years ended December 31,
   2009 2008 2007
Balance at beginning of period $1,936  $1,910  $1,965 
Provision charged to operations  300   300   50 
Loans charged off  (170  (348  (233
Recoveries  66   74   128 
Balance at end of period $2,132  $1,936  $1,910 

The Company’s recorded investment in loans that are considered impaired totaled $698,000 and $710,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These impaired loans carried allowances of $242,000 and $246,000, at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $704,000, $904,000 and $224,000 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company recognized no interest on impaired loans during the three years ended December 31, 2009. Year-end loans with no allocated allowance for loan losses totaled $165,000. Year end loans with an allocated allowance for loan losses totaled $533,000.

The principal balances of loans not accruing interest amounted to $1.9 million and $1.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Loans 90 days or more past due and accruing interest amounted to $43,000 and $0 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The differences between the amount of interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been paid in accordance with their original terms and the amount of interest income that was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $65,300, $85,800 and $78,000, respectively. There are no commitments to extend further credit on non-accruing loans.

Nonaccrual loans and loans past 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.

A substantial portion of the Company’s loans are mortgage and consumer loans in Oneida County. Accordingly, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(4)  Loans  – (continued)

susceptible to changes in market conditions in this area. A majority of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by real estate. Other than general economic risks, management is not aware of any material concentrations of credit risk to any industry or individual borrower. The Company does not originate sub-prime mortgage loans and has not purchased investments collateralized by sub-prime loans.

(5)  Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment at December 31 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

  
 2009 2008
Land $2,638  $2,638 
Buildings and improvements  6,374   6,369 
Furniture and equipment  8,186   8,015 
    17,198   17,022 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  11,157   10,650 
   $6,041  $6,372 

Depreciation and amortization expense included in building, occupancy and equipment expense amounted to $513,000, $563,000 and $587,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(6)  Deposits

Contractual maturities of time deposits at December 31 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 
 2009
Within one year $50,422 
One through two years  12,331 
Two through three years  3,990 
Three through four years  1,767 
Four through five years  3,393 
Total time deposits $71,903 

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, time deposits with balances of $100,000 or more totaled approximately $16,485,000 and $16,031,000, respectively.

Interest expense on deposits for the years ended December 31 is summarized as follows (in thousands):

   
 2009 2008 2007
Savings $330  $446  $454 
Money market  189   193   139 
Time  1,852   2,634   2,834 
Other interest bearing  55   69   65 
   $2,426  $3,342  $3,492 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(7)  Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB-NY). As a member, the Company is required to own capital stock in the FHLB-NY and is authorized to apply for advances from the FHLB-NY. Each advance is payable at its maturity date with a prepayment penalty for fixed rate advances. The Company has a blanket pledge on their one-to-four family mortgage loans as collateral for these borrowings. The following is a summary of advances and amortizing notes from the FHLB-NY at December 31 (in thousands):

  
 2009 2008
Overnight line of credit $1,100  $23,700 
Fixed rate advances  46,769   42,624 
Total borrowings $47,869  $66,324 

Advances at December 31, 2009 have maturity dates as follows (balances in thousands):

   
 Range of
Rates
 Average
Rate
 Balance
Overnight Line of Credit  0.32  0.32 $1,100 
2010  0.93% – 3.70  2.85  16,173 
2011  1.29% – 3.91  2.90  11,167 
2012  2.10% – 3.67  2.37  8,582 
2013  3.24% – 3.67  4.66  3,712 
2014  2.85% – 3.67  3.10  2,931 
Due after 2014  3.67% – 4.36  4.31  4,203 
Total       $47,869 

At December 31, 2009, the Company had additional availability on its FHLB line of credit of $43.0 million. This line of credit is subject to periodic review and renewal. At December 31, 2009, the Company also had approximately $8.5 million in unused short term borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which is collateralized by a portion of the consumer loan portfolio.

(8)  Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense (benefit) attributable to income from operations for the years ended December 31 consist of (in thousands):

   
 2009 2008 2007
Current:
               
Federal $1,513  $1,143  $1,539 
State  81   127   106 
    1,594   1,270   1,645 
Deferred:
               
Federal  (130  172   (38
State  23   (46  1 
    (107  126   (37
Total income tax expense $1,487  $1,396  $1,608 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(8)  Income Taxes  – (continued)

Actual tax expense differs from “expected” tax expense, computed by applying the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 34% to income before income taxes for the years ended December 31, as follows (in thousands):

   
 2009 2008 2007
Computed “expected” tax expense $1,555  $1,462  $1,585 
Increases (decreases) in income taxes resulting from:
               
State taxes, net of Federal tax benefit  69   54   71 
Tax exempt interest, net  (11  (19  (33
Tax exempt increase in cash surrender value of life insurance  (139  (139  (130
Non-deductible ESOP expense  16   57   107 
Other, net  (3  (19  8 
   $1,487  $1,396  $1,608 
Effective tax rate  32.5  32.5  34.5

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities for December 31 are (in thousands):

  
 2009 2008
Deferred tax assets:
          
Allowance for loan losses $758  $677 
Accrued postretirement benefits  922   1,000 
Deferred compensation  639   737 
Stock-based compensation and benefits  488   560 
Unrealized loss on investments due to other than temporary impairment charge  100   100 
Accrued pension cost  329   430 
Other  62   79 
Total gross deferred tax assets  3,298   3,583 
Deferred tax liabilities:
          
Depreciation  (217  (196
Undistributed income of subsidiary     (71
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities  (104  (17
Deferred loan costs  (113  (158
Other  (57  (15
Total gross deferred tax liabilities  (491  (457
Net deferred tax assets $2,807  $3,126 

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income or the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback period. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considers the scheduled reversal of the deferred tax liabilities, the level of historical taxable income and projected future taxable income over the periods in which the temporary differences comprising the deferred tax assets will be deductible. Management believes that no valuation allowance is necessary.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(8)  Income Taxes  – (continued)

In accordance with ASC 740, the Company has not recognized deferred tax liabilities with respect to Rome Savings’ Federal and state base-year reserves of approximately $3.4 million at December 31, 2009, since the Company does not expect that these amounts will become taxable in the foreseeable future. Under the tax laws, as amended, events that would result in taxation of these reserves include redemptions of Rome Savings’ stock or certain excess distributions to the Holding Company. The unrecognized deferred tax liability at December 31, 2009 with respect to the base-year reserve was approximately $1.3 million.

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had approximately $27,000 and $18,000, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits and interest. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, $27,000 and $18,000, respectively, of these tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions was $3,000 and $2,000, respectively, net of the related federal tax benefit. The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of its provision for federal and state income taxes.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as New York state income tax. The Company is no longer subject to federal examination for years prior to 2006. The Company has been notified of an upcoming New York State examination of tax years 2006 – 2008. The tax years 2006-2008 remain open to federal and state examination.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and the federal income tax benefit of unrecognized state tax benefits) is as follows (in thousands):

   
 2009 2008 2007
Balance at January 1 $24  $64  $15 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year  3   3    
Additions based on tax positions of prior years  7   21   49 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years         
Reductions due to statute of limitations         
Settlements     (64   
Balance at December 31 $34  $24  $64 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(9)  Pension and Postretirement Benefits

The Company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan that covers approximately 50% of all current full time employees. The Company’s Board of Directors amended the plan in December of 2002 to cease the accrual of any further benefits. In addition, the Company provides health care and life insurance benefits to certain retired full time employees.

The following table sets forth the changes in the Company’s pension and postretirement plans’ accumulated benefit obligations, fair value of assets and funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008:

    
 Pension benefits Postretirement benefits
(in thousands)
 2009 2008 2009 2008
Change in benefit obligation:
                    
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $5,951  $6,970  $2,564  $2,440 
Adjustment for measurement date change     80      40 
Service cost        19   21 
Interest cost  346   353   149   147 
Amendments and settlements  (112  (1,219      
Actuarial(gain)/ loss  204   185   (315  (28
Benefits paid  (346  (418  (97  (101
Participant contributions        43   45 
Benefit obligation at end of year  6,043   5,951   2,363   2,564 
Change in plan assets:
                    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year  4,971   8,869       
Actual return on plan assets  793   (2,261      
Employer contributions        54   56 
Settlements  (112  (1,219      
Participant contributions        43   45 
Benefits paid  (346  (418  (97  (101
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  5,306   4,971       
Funded status at end of year (plan assets less benefit obligations) $(737 $(980 $(2,363 $(2,564
Assumptions as of measurement dates – December 31, 2009 and 2008:
                    
Discount rate  6.00  6.00  6.00  6.00
Expected return on plan assets  9.00  9.00      
Rate of compensation increase  N/A   N/A       

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance which requires defined benefit plan assets and obligations to be measured as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end, starting in 2008. Through 2007, the Company utilized the early measurement date option


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(9)  Pension and Postretirement Benefits  – (continued)

available under previous FASB guidance and measured the funded status of the defined benefit plan and postretirement benefits plan assets and obligations as of September 30 each year. In accordance with the adoption provisions, the net periodic benefit cost for the period between the September 30 measurement date and the 2008 fiscal year end measurement were allocated proportionately between amounts to be recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings and net periodic benefit cost for the fiscal year. As a result of this adoption, the Company increased January 1, 2008 opening retained earnings by $24,000, increased deferred income tax liability by $16,000, decreased the pension liability by $80,000, and increased the other postretirement liability by $40,000.

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax) at December 31 consist of:

    
 Pension benefits Postretirement benefits
   2009 2008 2009 2008
Net actuarial gain (loss) $(1,988 $(2,312 $240  $22 
Prior service credit (cost)        17   52 
Total $(1,988 $(2,312 $257  $74 

The estimated net unrecognized loss and prior service credit that will be amortized from other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $(325,000) and $20,000, respectively.

The long term rate of return on plan assets assumption was set based on historical returns earned by equities and fixed income securities, adjusted to reflect expectations of future returns as applied to the plan’s target allocation of asset classes. Equities and fixed income securities were assumed to earn real rates of return in the ranges of 5 – 9% and 2 – 6%, respectively. The long term inflation rate was estimated to be 3%. When these overall return expectations are applied to the plan’s target allocation, the expected rate of return is determined to be 9%, which is roughly the midpoint of the range of expected return.

The Company’s pension plan weighted average allocations at December 31, 2009 and 2008, by asset category are summarized in the following table:

  
 Plan assets at
December 31,
Asset Category 2009 2008
Equity Securities  63  59
Debt Securities  37  41
Total  100  100

The Company’s long-term investment objective is to be invested 65% in equity securities and 35% in debt securities. Plan assets are invested in diversified investment funds of the RSI Retirement Trust (the “Trust”), a private placement investment fund. The investment funds include a series of equity and bond mutual funds or commingled trust funds, each with its own investment objectives, investment strategies and risks, as detailed in the statement of Investment Objectives and Guidelines. The Trust has been given discretion by the Plan Sponsor to determine the appropriate strategic asset allocation versus plan liabilities as governed by the Trust’s Statement of Investment Objectives and Guidelines (the “Guidelines”). If the plan is underfunded under the Guidelines, the bond fund will be temporarily increased to 50% in order to lessen asset volatility. When the plan is no longer underfunded, the bond fund portion will be decreased back to 35%. Asset rebalancing is performed at least annually, with interim adjustments made when the equity and fixed income allocations vary by more than 10% from their respective targets (i.e., a 20% policy range guideline).


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(9)  Pension and Postretirement Benefits  – (continued)

The long-term investment objectives are to maintain plan assets at a level that will sufficiently cover long-term obligations and to generate a return on plan assets that will meet or exceed the rate at which long-term obligations will grow. The investment goal is to achieve investment results that will contribute o the proper funding of the pension plan by exceeding the rate of inflation over the long-term. In addition, investment managers for the Trust are expected to provide above average performance when compared to their peer managers. Performance volatility is also monitored. Risk/volatility is further managed by the distinct investment objectives of each of the Trust funds and the diversification within each fund.

Fair Value of Plan Assets:

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Entities are required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of the investments held as plan assets. The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3). The Plan assets include no investments that are classified as Level 3 for basis of fair market valuation.

The fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2009, by asset category, is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
  Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using:
Plan Assets: Carrying
Value
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Equity Mutual Funds $1,029  $1,029  $ 
Equity Trusts  2,324      2,324 
Fixed Income Trusts  1,953      1,953 
Total $5,306  $1,029  $4,277 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Company expects to make no contributions to the pension plan. The following estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in thousands):

  
Asset Category Pension
Benefits
 Postretirement
Benefits
Fiscal 2010 $375  $142 
Fiscal 2011  395   148 
Fiscal 2012  424   155 
Fiscal 2013  432   156 
Fiscal 2014  446   161 
Fiscal 2015 – 2019  2,337   823 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(9)  Pension and Postretirement Benefits  – (continued)

The components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income include the following:

      
 Pension benefits Postretirement benefits
(in thousands) 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007
Service cost $  $  $  $19  $21  $25 
Interest cost  346   353   430   149   147   140 
Expected return on assets  (431  (673  (734         
Settlement charge     134             
Amortization  383      42   (8  (8  (8
Net periodic cost (benefit)  298   (186  (262  160   160   157 
Net (gain) loss  (157  3,280   (504  (315  (30  (24
Recognition of loss     (134              
Amortization of prior service cost  (383        8   8   8 
Total recognized in other comprehensive income  (540  3,146   (504  (307  (22  (16
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income $(242 $2,960  $(766 $(147 $138  $157 

During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded a curtailment charge of $134,000 related to a partial settlement of the defined benefit pension plan. In December of 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the defined benefit pension plan to cease the accrual of further benefits. There is no assumed increase in the per capita cost of current health care benefits since the employer contributions are fixed with the retiree paying for any cost increases.

(10) Stock Option Plan

On May 3, 2000, the Company’s shareholders approved the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Stock Option Plan”). The primary objective of the 2000 Stock Option Plan is to provide officers and directors with a proprietary interest in the Company and an incentive to encourage such persons to remain with the Company.

Under the 2000 Stock Option Plan, 517,952 shares of authorized but unissued common stock are reserved for issuance upon option exercises. The Company also has the alternative to fund the 2000 Stock Option Plan with treasury stock. Options under the plan may be either non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options. Each option entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. On June 28, 2000, 382,357 options were awarded at an exercise price of $2.19 per share. These options have a ten-year term and vested at a rate of 20% per year from the grant date. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 the remaining contractual life of these options was 0.5 years and 1.5 years, respectively.

On May 3, 2006, the Company’s shareholders approved the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Stock Option Plan”), which also has the primary objective of providing officers and directors with a proprietary interest in the Company and an incentive to encourage such persons to remain with the Company. Under the 2006 Stock Option Plan, 590,000 shares of authorized but unissued common stock


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(10) Stock Option Plan  – (continued)

are reserved for issuance upon option exercises. The Company also has the alternative to fund the 2006 Stock Option Plan with treasury stock. Options under the plan may be either non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options.

Each option entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. On May 24, 2006, 354,000 options were awarded at an exercise price of $12.84 per share. These options have a ten-year term and vest at a rate of 20% per year from the grant date. The fair value of the 2006 options awarded was estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model and the following assumptions: risk free interest rate 4.60%, an expected term of 6.5 years, expected stock price volatility of 8.25% and a dividend yield of 2.52%. At December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the remaining contractual life of these options was 6.4 years and 7.4 years, respectively.

Under FASB guidance, stock-based compensation expense of $1.69 per option granted under the 2006 Stock Option Plan is being recorded over the sooner of the vesting period of the options, or upon the date at which a recipient becomes eligible for normal or early retirement under the Company’s defined benefit plan. At May 24, 2006, certain awardees met the retirement eligibility criteria and accordingly, stock-based compensation expense of $350,000 related to their options was expensed immediately. Total compensation cost related to the Company’s stock option plans was $50,000 for each of the three years ended December 31, 2009.

Information related to the stock option plans during each year follows:

   
 2009 2008 2007
Intrinsic value of options exercised $18,000  $25,000  $1.7 million 
Cash received from option exercises        356,000 
Tax benefit realized from option exercises        156,000 
Weighted average fair value of options granted         

As of December 31, 2009, there was $71,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.42 years. At December 31, 2009, the intrinsic value of all outstanding options and exercisable options was $0.

The following table presents the stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2009:

  
 2009
   Shares Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year  356,726  $12.76 
Exercised  (2,726  2.19 
Granted      
Outstanding at end of year  354,000  $12.84 
Exercisable at end of year  212,400  $12.84 

All outstanding stock options are expected to vest.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(11) Recognition and Retention Plan

The Company’s shareholders approved the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2000 Recognition and Retention Plan (“2000 RRP”) on May 3, 2000. The purpose of the plan is to promote the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing a stock-based compensation program to attract and retain officers and directors. During 2000, 119,742 shares were awarded under the 2000 RRP. The shares vested at a rate of 20% per year from the grant date. The fair market value of the shares awarded under the plan was $262,000 at the grant date, and was amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods of the underlying shares.

The Company’s shareholders approved the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan (“2006 RRP”) on May 3, 2006 in order to further promote the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing a stock-based compensation program to attract and retain officers and directors.

On May 24, 2006, 168,300 shares were awarded under the 2006 RRP. These shares vest at a rate of 20% per year from the grant date. The fair market value of the shares awarded under the plan was $2.2 million at the grant date, and is being amortized over the sooner of the vesting period of the awards, or upon the date at which a recipient becomes eligible for normal or early retirement under the Company’s defined benefit plan. At May 24, 2006, certain awardees met the retirement eligibility criteria and accordingly, stock-based compensation expense of $1.1 million related to their 2006 RRP awards was expensed immediately. Stock-based compensation expense of $178,000, $231,000 and $263,000 related to RRP awards was recorded in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The remaining unearned compensation cost has been shown as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. The shares awarded under the RRP were transferred from treasury stock at cost with the difference between the fair market value on the grant date and the cost of the shares recorded as additional paid-in capital.

A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested shares for the year follows:

  
 Shares Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2009  100,980    
Granted      
Vested  33,660  $12.84 
Forfeited      
Nonvested at December 31, 2009  67,320  $12.84 

As of December 31, 2009, there was $252,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested shares granted under the RRP. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $300,000, $384,000 and $416,000.

(12) Other Employee Benefits

The Company has a defined contribution 401(k) Savings Plan for all full time salaried employees. Employees are permitted to contribute up to 75% of base pay to the Savings Plan, subject to certain limitations. The Company matches 50% of each employee’s contributions up to a limit of 3% of the employee’s base pay. Contributions to the defined contribution 401(k) Savings Plan were $88,000, $86,000 and $77,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(12) Other Employee Benefits  – (continued)

In connection with establishing an ESOP in 1999, the ESOP borrowed $933,000 from the Company to purchase 453,488 shares of the Company’s common stock. The loan bears interest at 8% and is payable in fifteen annual installments. At December 31, 2009, 332,547 of the original ESOP shares had been released or committed to be released of which 120,941 remained as unallocated shares.

On March 30, 2005, in connection with the Company’s second-step conversion and stock offering, the ESOP borrowed $2,360,000 from the Company to purchase an additional 236,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The loan bears interest at 5% and is payable in fifteen annual installments. At December 31, 2009, 78,666 of these shares had been released or committed to be released and 157,334 remained as unallocated shares.

The fair value of the unallocated shares on December 31, 2009 was $2.2 million. The Company recognized compensation expense of $384,000, $495,000 and $557,000 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively in connection with the ESOP.

The Company has also adopted a Benefit Restoration Plan for the Company’s CEO. This plan provides the beneficiary with the benefits that would otherwise be due to him as a participant in the 401(k) plan and the employee stock ownership plan if such benefits were not limited by certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, in the event the beneficiary retires prior to the end of the ESOP loan term, the plan will provide him a benefit equal to the value of the shares of Rome Bancorp that would have been allocated to his account under the ESOP had he remained employed through the end of the ESOP loan term. The liability associated with this plan was $527,000 and $685,000 at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

(13) Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income represents net income and other comprehensive income (loss) which is the net change in the unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale and unrealized gains and losses on pension and postretirement liabilities, net of taxes. The following summarizes the components of other comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):

   
 Years ended December 31,
   2009 2008 2007
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period $1,136  $(3,325 $439 
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gain) loss included in net income  (73  265   (11
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax  1,063   (3,060  428 
Deferred tax expense (benefit)  425   (1,224  171 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax $638  $(1,836 $257 

The following is a summary of the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) balances, net of tax (in thousands):

   
 Balance at
12/31/08
 2009
Change
 Balance at
12/31/09
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities $26  $130  $156 
Unrealized gains (losses) on pension and postretirement benefits  (2,238  508   (1,730
   $(2,212 $638  $(1,574

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(14) Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments consist of commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, market and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if obligated counterparties failed completely to perform as contracted. Market risk represents risk that future changes in market prices make financial instruments less valuable.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s evaluation of the customer’s financial position. Collateral held varies, but may include real estate, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties. Substantially all commitments to extend credit, if exercised, will represent loans secured by real estate.

At December 31, 2009 and 2008 the Company was committed to originate mortgage and other loans of approximately $7.5 million and $3.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company’s fixed rate loan commitments totaled $7.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The range of interest rates on these fixed rate commitments was 4.50% to 6.75% at December 31, 2009 and 5.875% to 8.5% at December 31, 2008. Commitments under unused lines of credit and letters of credit were approximately $19.4 million and $18.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for loan commitments is represented by the contractual or notional amount of these instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The Company controls its credit risk through credit approvals, limits, and monitoring procedures.

In the normal course of business, there are various outstanding legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, the aggregate amount involved in such proceedings is not material to the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(15) Earnings Per Share

The following summarizes the computation of earnings per share for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

   
 2009 2008 2007
Basic earnings per share:
               
Net Income $3,087  $2,905  $3,054 
Weighted average basic shares outstanding  6,900   7,353   8,234 
Less: Average unallocated ESOP shares  (307  (353  (399
Average basic shares  6,593   7,000   7,835 
Basic earnings per share $0.47  $0.42  $0.39 
Diluted earnings per share:
               
Net Income $3,087  $2,905  $3,054 
Weighted average basic shares outstanding  6,593   7,000   7,835 
Effect of dilutive securities:
               
Stock options     3   19 
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding  6,593   7,003   7,854 
Diluted earnings per share $0.47  $0.41  $0.39 

Stock options for 354,000 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for each of the three years ended December 31, 2009 because they were anti-dilutive.

(16) Shareholders’ Equity and Regulatory Matters

Rome Savings is required to maintain certain reserves of vault cash and/or deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The amount of this reserve requirement, included in cash on hand, is $1.7 million at December 31, 2009.

The Company’s ability to pay dividends is primarily dependent upon the ability of its subsidiary bank to pay dividends to the Company. The payment of dividends by Rome Savings is subject to continued compliance with minimum regulatory capital requirements. In addition, regulatory approval is generally required prior to Rome Savings declaring dividends in an amount in excess of net income for that year plus net income retained in the preceding two years. Further, under the OTS’ conversion regulations, the Company could not return any capital, other than ordinary dividends, to its stockholders during the three years following the conversion and offering completed in March of 2005.

The Company and Rome Savings are subject to various regulatory requirements administered by the federal banking agencies and Rome Savings is a federal savings bank regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). The Company is a Delaware corporation and is regulated as a savings and loan holding company by the OTS. The Bank must obtain regulatory approval to pay cash dividends to the Company.

Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Rome Savings must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.

Capital amounts are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and Bank’s financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(16) Shareholders’ Equity and Regulatory Matters  – (continued)

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), established capital levels for which insured institutions are categorized as well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized.

As of August 21, 2008, the most recent notification from the OTS categorized Rome Savings as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective actions. There have been no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed Rome Savings’ category. Management believes, as of December 31, 2009, that the Company and Bank meet and exceed all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

The Qualified Thrift lender test requires at least 65% of assets be maintained in housing-related finance and other specified areas. If this test is not met, limits are placed on growth, branching, new investments, FHLB advances and dividends, or the Bank must convert to a commercial bank charter. Management believes that this test is met.

The following is a summary of Rome Savings’ actual capital amounts and ratios compared to the regulatory minimum capital adequacy requirements and the OTS and FDIC requirements for classification as a well capitalized institution under prompt corrective action provisions (dollars in thousands):

      
 Actual Minimum capital
adequacy
requirements
 To be classified as
Well-capitalized
under prompt
corrective action
provisions
   Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
As of December 31, 2009:
                              
Total capital (to risk weighted assets): $55,866   23.04 $19,394   >=8 $24,243   >=10
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets):  54,046   22.29  9,697   >=4  14,546   >=6
Tier 1 Capital (to adjusted assets):  54,046   16.27  9,963   >=3  16,605   >=5
As of December 31, 2008:
                              
Total capital (to risk weighted assets): $59,845   24.45 $19,579   >=8 $24,474   >=10
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets):  58,229   23.79  9,790   >=4  14,684   >=6
Tier 1 Capital (to adjusted assets):  58,229   17.15  10,186   >=3  16,977   >=5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(16) Shareholders’ Equity and Regulatory Matters  – (continued)

Following is a reconciliation of Rome Savings’ GAAP shareholders’ equity to regulatory Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

  
 December 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
GAAP Shareholders’ Equity $52,540  $55,983 
Plus: Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary and other comprehensive loss related to SFAS No. 158  1,730   2,342 
Less: Disallowed assets and unrealized gains on available-for- sale securities, net of tax  (224  (26
Tier 1 Capital  54,046   58,229 
Plus: Allowance for loan losses  2,132   1,936 
Allowed unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities      
Less: Real estate held for investment  (312  (320
Total Regulatory Capital $55,866  $59,845 

(17) Fair Value

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used to in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).

The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(17) Fair Value  – (continued)

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

  
 Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2009 Using
   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets:
          
Available for sale securities $568  $9,456 

  
 Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2008 Using
   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets:
          
Available for sale securities $500  $3,063 

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

   
 Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2009 Using
   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Impaired loans $  $  $456 

   
 Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2008 Using
   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Impaired loans $  $  $464 

The following represent impairment charges recognized during the period:

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $698,000, with a valuation allowance of $242,000, resulting in no additional provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, impaired loans had a carrying amount of $710,000, with a valuation allowance of $246,000, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $234,000.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents:  For these short-term instruments that generally mature in ninety days or less, the carrying value approximates fair value.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(17) Fair Value  – (continued)

Securities:  The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used to in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock:  It is not practicable to determine the value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.

Loans:  The fair values for all loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit rating. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value. The Company has not considered market illiquidity in estimating the fair value of loans due to uncertain and inconsistent market pricing being experienced at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Deposits:  The fair values of demand deposits (interest and non-interest checking) savings accounts and money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposits, are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on these products to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

FHLB advances:  Fair values of long-term borrowings are estimated using a discounted cash flow approach, based on current market rates for similar borrowings. The fair value of accrued interest approximates carrying value.

Off-balance-sheet instruments:  Fair values for the Company’s off-balance-sheet instruments (lines of credit and commitments to fund loans) are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair value of these financial instruments is immaterial and has therefore been excluded from the table below.

The estimated carrying values and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, not previously presented, for December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

    
 2009 2008
   Carrying
amount
 Fair value Carrying
amount
 Fair value
Financial assets:
                    
Cash and cash equivalents $7,574  $7,574  $9,579  $9,579 
Securities available for sale  10,024   10,024   3,563   3,563 
Securities held to maturity  1,431   1,502   1,447   1,561 
Loans, net  285,617   288,524   298,453   302,424 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock  3,222   n/a   3,578   n/a 
Accrued interest receivable  1,117   1,117   1,085   1,085 
Financial liabilities:
                    
Non-interest bearing deposits  31,790   31,790   28,373   28,373 
Interest bearing deposits  184,849   185,320   177,559   178,007 
FHLB advances  47,869   48,342   66,324   67,273 
Accrued interest payable  127   127   121   121 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(17) Fair Value  – (continued)

It is not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

(18) Parent Company Only Financial Statements

Presented below is the condensed balance sheet of the Parent Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and statement of income and statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):

  
Condensed Balance Sheets 2009 2008
Assets:
          
Cash and due from banks $4,106  $421 
Investment in subsidiary bank  52,470   55,982 
Loan receivable from ESOP  2,075   2,277 
Other assets  1,756   1,749 
Total assets $60,407  $60,429 
Total liabilities $42  $85 
Total shareholders’ equity  60,365   60,344 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $60,407  $60,429 

   
Condensed Statements of Income 2009 2008 2007
Interest and investment income $182  $172  $301 
Dividends from subsidiary bank  8,000   10,300   3,000 
Total operating income  8,182   10,472   3,301 
Net loss on securities     265    
Other operating expenses  507   574   680 
Income (loss) before income taxes and dividends in excess of net income/equity in undistributed income of subsidiary bank  7,675   9,633   2,621 
Equity in undistributed income (dividends in excess of net income) of subsidiary bank  (4,588  (6,728  433 
Net income $3,087  $2,905  $3,054 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(18) Parent Company Only Financial Statements  – (continued)

   
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows 2009 2008 2007
Operating activities:
               
Net income $3,087  $2,905  $3,054 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
               
(Equity in undistributed earnings of)/dividends in excess of net income of subsidiary bank  4,588   6,728   (433
Amortization of stock-based compensation  228   280   313 
Net loss on securities other than temporarily impaired     265    
Increase in other assets  (99  (139  (213
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities  (43  29   (86
Net cash provided by operating activities  7,761   10,068   2,635 
Investing activities:
               
Decrease in loan to ESOP  202   190   179 
Net cash provided by investing activities  202   190   179 
Financing activities:
               
Purchase of treasury stock  (2,058  (8,174  (10,181
Dividends  (2,220  (2,387  (2,518
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefits        512 
Net cash used in financing activities  (4,278  (10,561  (12,187
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  3,685   (303  (9,373
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  421   724   10,097 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $4,106  $421  $724 

(19) Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Selected quarterly financial data for 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

    
 2009 Quarter Ending
   March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net interest income $3,250  $3,230  $3,257  $3,304 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  3,250   3,030   3,257   3,204 
Net income  707   647   908   825 
Earnings per common share:
                    
Basic: $0.11  $0.10  $0.14  $0.13 
Diluted  0.11   0.10   0.14   0.13 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(19) Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)  – (continued)

    
 2008 Quarter Ending
   March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net interest income $3,237  $3,205  $3,276  $3,349 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  3,237   3,205   3,176   3,149 
Net income  700   780   815   610 
Earnings per common share:
                    
Basic: $0.10  $0.11  $0.12  $0.09 
Diluted  0.10   0.11   0.12   0.09 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEXAPPENDIX A

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
  
BY AND BETWEEN
  
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.
  
AND
  
ROMELEGACY BANCORP, INC.

DATED AS OF

OCTOBER 12,

December 21, 2010


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
ARTICLE I CERTAIN DEFINITIONS  1 

1.1

Certain Definitions.

  1 
ARTICLE II THE MERGER  7 

2.1

Merger.

  7 

2.2

Closing; Effective Time.

  7 

2.3

Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.

  7 

2.4

Directors and Officers of the Surviving Corporation; Advisory Board.Corporation.

  7 

2.5

Effects of the Merger.

  87 

2.6

Tax Consequences.

  87 

2.7

Possible Alternative Structures.

  87 

2.8

Additional Actions.

  8 
ARTICLE III CONVERSION OF SHARES  8 

3.1

Conversion of RomeLegacy Common Stock; Merger Consideration.

  8 

3.2

Election Procedures.Procedures for Exchange of Legacy Common Stock.

  10 

3.3

Procedures for ExchangeTreatment of Rome Common Stock.Legacy Stock Options.

  11 

3.4

Treatment of Rome Options.Bank Merger.

  1312 

3.5

Bank Merger.Headquarters.

  1312 

3.6

Reservation of Shares.

  1312 
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ROMELEGACY  1312 

4.1

Standard.

  1412 

4.2

Organization.

  1412 

4.3

Capitalization.

  1413 

4.4

Authority; No Violation.

  1514 

4.5

Consents.

  1614 

4.6

Financial Statements.

  1615 

4.7

Taxes.

  1615 

4.8

No Material Adverse Effect.

  1716 

4.9

Material Contracts; Leases; Defaults.

  1716 

4.10

Ownership of Property; Insurance Coverage.

  1817 

4.11

Legal Proceedings.

  1918 

4.12

Compliance Withwith Applicable Law.

  1918 

4.13

Employee Benefit Plans.

  2019 

4.14

Brokers, Finders and Financial Advisors.

  2221 

4.15

Environmental Matters.

  2221 

4.16

Loan Portfolio.

  2322 

4.17

Related Party Transactions.

  2423 

4.18

Deposits.

  2423 

4.19

Board Approval.

  2423 

4.20

Registration Obligations.

  2423 

i


4.21

Risk Management Instruments.

  2423 

4.22

Fairness Opinion.

  2523 

4.23

Intellectual Property.

  2524 

4.24

Duties as Fiduciary.

  2524 

4.25

Employees; Labor Matters.

  2524 

4.26

RomeLegacy Information Supplied.

  2624 

4.27

Securities Documents.

  2625 

4.28

Internal Controls.

  2625 

4.29

Bank Owned Life Insurance.

  26

i


4.30

Clocktower Insurance Agency Incorporated.

2625 

4.314.30

Stock Transfer Records.

  26 
ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BHBBHLB  26 

5.1

Standard.

  2726 

5.2

Organization.

  2726 

5.3

Capitalization.

  27 

5.4

Authority; No Violation.

  2827 

5.5

Consents.

  28 

5.6

Financial Statements.

  2928 

5.7

Tax Matters.

  2926 

5.8

No Material Adverse Effect.

  2930 

5.9

Ownership of Property; Insurance Coverage.

  2930 

5.10

Legal Proceedings.

  3037 

5.11

Compliance Withwith Applicable Law.

  3031 

5.12

Employee Benefit Plans.

  31 

5.13

Brokers, Finders and Financial Advisors.

  33 

5.14

Environmental Matters.

  3334 

5.15

BHBBHLB Information Supplied.

  34 

5.16

Securities Documents.

  3435 

5.17

Internal Controls.

  3435 

5.18

BHBBHLB Common Stock.

  3436 

5.19

Available Funds

  3436 

5.20

Berkshire Insurance Group, Inc.

  3536 

5.21

Fairness Opinion.

  3536 

5.22

Board Approval.

36

5.23

Material Agreement; Defaults.

36

5.24

Loan Portfolio.

37

5.25

Related Party Transactions.

37

5.26

Risk Management Instruments.

37

5.27

Duties as Fiduciary.

38

5.28

Employees; Labor Matters.

38

ii


ARTICLE VI COVENANTS OF ROMELEGACY  3538 

6.1

Conduct of Business.

  3538 

6.2

Subsidiaries.

  3842 

6.3

Current Information.

  3842 

6.4

Access to Properties and Records.

  3942 

6.5

Financial and Other Statements.

  4043 

6.6

Maintenance of Insurance.

  4043 

6.7

Disclosure Supplements.

  4043 

6.8

Consents and Approvals of Third Parties.

  4044 

6.9

All Reasonable Efforts.

  4144 

6.10

Failure to Fulfill Conditions.

  4144 

6.11

No Solicitation.

  4144 

6.12

Reserves and Merger-Related Costs.

  4246 

6.13

Board of Directors and Committee Meetings.

  4246 

6.14

Stock Repurchase Plan; ESOP LoanLoan.

  4246 

6.15

The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks Foundation

  4246 

6.16

401(k) Plan.Plan Termination.

  4247 
ARTICLE VII COVENANTS OF BHBBHLB  4347 

7.1

Negative Covenants. During the period from the dateConduct of this Agreement to the Effective Time, except with the written consent of Rome, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, BHB will not, and will cause each BHB Subsidiary not to, operate its business other than in the usual, regular and ordinary course of business and will use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business organization and assets and maintain its rights and franchises; and voluntarily take no action which would:Business.

  4347 

7.2

Disclosure Supplements.

  4347 

7.3

Consents and Approvals of Third Parties.

  4348 

ii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

7.4

All Reasonable EffortsBest Efforts.

  4448 

7.5

Failure to Fulfill Conditions.

  4448 

7.6

Employee Benefits.

  4448 

7.7

Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance.

  4651 

7.8

Stock Listing.

  4752 

7.9

Reservation of Stock.

  4752 

7.10

Communications to RomeLegacy Employees; Training

  4752

7.11

Current Information.

52

7.12

Access to Properties and Records.

52

7.13

Financial and Other Statements.

53

7.14

Committee Meetings.

53

7.15

New Hires.

53

7.16

New Members.

53 
ARTICLE VIII REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS  4854 

8.1

Meeting of Shareholders.

  4854 

8.2

Proxy Statement-Prospectus; Merger Registration Statement.

  4854 

8.3

Regulatory Approvals.

  4955 
ARTICLE IX CLOSING CONDITIONS  4955 

9.1

Conditions to Each Party’s Obligations under this Agreement.

  4955 

iii


9.2

Conditions to the Obligations of BHBBHLB under this Agreement.

  5056 

9.3

Conditions to the Obligations of RomeLegacy under this Agreement.

  5057 
ARTICLE X THE CLOSING  51

10.1

Time and Place.

51

10.2

Deliveries at the Pre-Closing and the Closing.

5157 
ARTICLE XI TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER  5257 

11.1

Termination.

  5257 

11.2

Effect of Termination.

  5361 

11.3

Amendment, Extension and Waiver.

  5462

11.4

Additional Provisions Regarding Termination:

62 
ARTICLE XII MISCELLANEOUS  5463 

12.1

Confidentiality.

  5463 

12.2

Public Announcements.

  5463 

12.3

Survival.

  5463 

12.4

Notices.

  5563 

12.5

Parties in Interest.

  5564 

12.6

Complete Agreement.

  5564 

12.7

Counterparts.

  5464 

12.8

Severability.

  5664 

12.9

Governing Law.

  5665 

12.10

Interpretation.

  5665 

12.11

Specific Performance.

  5665 

12.12

Waiver of Trial by Jury.

EXHIBITS
  56
A Form of Voting Agreement
B Settlement Agreement
 

EXHIBITS

AForm of Voting Agreement

iiiiv


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this “Agreement”) is dated as of October 12,December 21, 2010 by and between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“BHBBHLB”), and RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“RomeLegacy”).

Recitals

1.  The Board of Directors of each of BHBBHLB and RomeLegacy (i) has determined that this Agreement and the business combination and related transactions contemplated hereby are in the best interests of their respective companies and shareholders, (ii) has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby are consistent with and in furtherance of their respective business strategies and (iii) has approved this Agreement.

2.  In accordance with the terms of this Agreement, RomeLegacy will merge with and into BHBBHLB (the “Merger”), and it is anticipated that immediately thereafter The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Rome,Legacy, will be merged with and into Berkshire Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHB.BHLB.

3.  As a condition to the willingness of BHBBHLB to enter into this Agreement, each of the directors and executive officers of Rome and The Rome Savings BankLegacy have entered into a Voting Agreement, substantially in the form ofExhibit A hereto, dated as of the date hereof, with BHBBHLB (the “Voting Agreement”), pursuant to which each such director and executive officer has agreed, among other things, to vote all shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock (as defined herein) owned by such Person in favor of the approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in such Voting Agreement.

4.  The parties intend the Merger to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and that this Agreement be and is hereby adopted as a “plan of reorganization” within the meaning of Sections 354 and 361 of the Code.

5.  The parties desire to make certain representations, warranties and agreements in connection with the business transactions described in this Agreement and to prescribe certain conditions thereto.

6.  In consideration of the mutual covenants, representations, warranties and agreements herein contained, and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

ARTICLE I
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

1.1  Certain Definitions.

As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings.

Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.11.1.

Acquisition Proposal” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.11.

Affiliate” shall mean any Person who directly, or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such Person and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes any executive officer or director of such Person and any Affiliate of such executive officer or director.

Alternative Acquisition Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.1.11.

Agreement” shall mean this agreement, the exhibits and schedules hereto and any amendment hereto.

Bank Merger” shall mean the merger of The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks with and into Berkshire Bank, with Berkshire Bank as the surviving institution.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bank Regulator” shall mean any Federal or state banking regulator, including but not limited to the MDOB, OTS and FDIC, which regulates or has the statutory authority to regulate Berkshire Bank, The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, and their respective holding companies and subsidiaries, as the case may be.be, and the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission, or any other relevant Federal or state regulator, as it relates to anticompetitive matters.

“Benefit Plan Determination Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.6.1.

Berkshire Bank” shall mean Berkshire Bank, a Massachusetts savings bank with its principal offices located at 24 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01202, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of BHB.


TABLE OF CONTENTSBHLB.

Berkshire Insurance” means Berkshire Insurance Group, Inc., an independent insurance agency which is wholly owned by BHB.BHLB.

BHBBHLB” shall mean Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal executive offices located at 24 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 02101.

BHBBHLB Benefit Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.12.1.

BHBBHLB Common Stock” shall mean the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of BHB.BHLB.

BHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule” shall mean the collective written disclosure schedules delivered by BHBBHLB to RomeLegacy pursuant hereto.

BHBBHLB Financial Statements” shall mean the (i) the audited consolidated statements of financial condition (including related notes and schedules) of BHBBHLB as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows (including related notes and schedules, if any) of BHBBHLB for each of the three (3) years ended December 31, 2009, as set forth in BHB’sBHLB’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and (ii) the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of BHBBHLB as of the end of each calendar quarter following December 31, 2009, and for the periods then ended, as filed by BHBBHLB in its Securities Documents.

BHBBHLB Loan Property” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.14.2.

BHBBHLB Loan Participation” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.14.2.

BHBBHLB Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.12.1.

BHBBHLB Preferred Stock” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.3.1.

���BHBBHLB Regulatory Reports” shall mean the Call Reports of Berkshire Bank, and accompanying schedules (other than such schedules as are required to be kept confidential pursuant to applicable law or regulatory requirements), filed or to be filed with the FDIC with respect to each calendar quarter beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2010, through the Closing Date, and all Annual Reports on Form H-(b)11 and any Current Report on Form H-(b)11 filed with the OTS by BHBBHLB from December 31, 2009 through the Closing Date.

BHBBHLB SEC Reports” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.16.

BHBBHLB Shareholders Meeting” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.1.2.

BHBBHLB Stock” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.3.1.

BHBBHLB Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, 10% or more of the capital stock of which is owned, either directly or indirectly, by BHBBHLB or Berkshire Bank, except any corporation the stock of which is held in the ordinary course of the lending activities of Berkshire Bank.

Cash ElectionBusiness Day”” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.4.

Cash Consideration” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.4.

Cash Election Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.4.

Cause shall mean personal dishonesty, willful misconduct, failure to perform duties after notice from the employee’s supervisorany day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or breach of fiduciary duty,day on which banks in the courseCommonwealth of employment with BHB,Massachusetts are authorized or violation of any cease-and-desistobligated by law or executive order with respect to employment.close.

Certificate” shall mean a certificate or book entry evidencing shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock.

Claim” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.7.2.


Clocktower” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.30.1.TABLE OF CONTENTS

Closing Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2.

COBRA” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.13.5.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Confidentiality Agreements” shall mean thosethe confidentiality agreementsagreement dated as of August 23, 2010 and August 24,November 18, 2010 between BHBBHLB and Rome.Legacy.

“CRA” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.12.1.

“Current RomeLegacy Employees” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.6.2.

DGCL” shall mean the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Dissenting Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.6.

Dissenting Shareholder” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.6.

Effective Time” shall mean the date and time specified pursuant to Section 2.2 as the effective time of the Merger.

Election Deadline” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.3.

Election Form” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.2.

Environmental Laws” shall mean any applicable federal, state or local law, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, code, license, permit, approval, consent, order, judgment, decree, injunction or agreement with any governmental entityGovernmental Entity as in effect on or prior to the date of this Agreement relating to (1) the protection, preservation or restoration of the environment (including, without limitation, air, water vapor, surface water, groundwater, drinking water supply, surface soil, subsurface soil, plant and animal life or any other natural resource), and/or (2) the use, storage, recycling, treatment, generation, transportation, processing, handling, labeling, production, release or disposal of Materials of Environmental Concern. The term Environmental Law includes without limitation (a) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq; the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq; the Toxic Substances Control Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq; the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001, et seq; the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300f, et seq; and all comparable state and local laws, and (b) any common law (including without limitation common law that may impose strict liability) that may impose liability or obligations for injuries or damages due to the presence of or exposure to any Materials of Environmental Concern as in effect on or prior to the date of this Agreement.

ERISA” shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

ERISA Affiliate” shall mean, with respect to any Person, any other Person that, together with such Person, would be treated as a single employer under Section 414 of the Code or Section 4001 of ERISA.

Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Exchange Agent” shall mean Registrar and Transfer Company, or such other bank or trust company or other agent as mutually agreed upon by BHBBHLB and Rome,Legacy, which shall act as agent for BHBBHLB in connection with the exchange procedures for exchanging Certificates for the Merger Consideration.

Exchange Fund” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.3.1.

Exchange Ratio” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.3.3.1.3, subject to adjustment under Section 11.1.9.

FDIC” shall mean the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any successor thereto.

FHLB” shall mean the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York with respect to The Rome Savings Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston with respect to Berkshire Bank.Boston.

Foundation” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.15.

GAAP” shall mean accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applied on a consistent basis.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Go Shop Period” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.11.1.

Governmental Entity” shall mean any Federal or state court, department, administrative agency or commission or other governmental authority or instrumentality.

HOLA” shall mean the Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1933, as amended.

Indemnified Parties” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.7.2.

Insurance Regulator” shall mean the Massachusetts Division of Insurance and any other Governmental Entity which has authority to regulate a Massachusetts insurance agency.

IRS” shall mean the United States Internal Revenue Service.

Knowledge” as used with respect to a Person (including references to such Person being aware of a particular matter) shall mean those facts that are known or should have been known by the officers and directors of such Person and includes any facts, matters or circumstances set forth in any written notice from any Bank Regulator or any other written notice received by an officer or director of that Person.after reasonable inquiry.

Mailing DateLegacy” shall mean Legacy Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal office located at 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201.

Legacy Banks” shall mean Legacy Banks, a Massachusetts savings bank, with its principal office located at 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201, and which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Legacy.

Legacy Benefit Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.2.4.13.1.

Legacy Common Stock” shall mean the common shares, par value $0.01 per share, of Legacy.

Legacy Disclosure Schedule” shall mean the collective written disclosure schedules delivered by Legacy to BHLB pursuant hereto.

Legacy ESOP” shall mean the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Legacy Banks or any successor thereto.

Legacy Financial Statements” shall mean (i) the audited consolidated statements of financial condition (including related notes and schedules) of Legacy as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows (including related notes and schedules, if any) of Legacy for each of the three (3) years ended December 31, 2009, as incorporated by reference in Legacy’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 from Legacy’s annual report to shareholders for such year and (ii) the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Legacy as of the end of each calendar quarter following December 31, 2009, and for the periods then ended, as filed by Legacy in its Securities Documents.

Legacy Loan Participation” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.15.2.

Legacy Loan Property” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.15.2.

“Legacy Preferred Stock”shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.3.

Legacy Regulatory Reports” shall mean the Call Reports of Legacy Banks, and accompanying schedules (other than such schedules as are required to be kept confidential pursuant to applicable law or regulatory requirements), filed or to be filed with the FDIC with respect to each calendar quarter beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2010, through the Closing Date, and all Annual Reports on Form H-(b)11 and any Current Report on Form H-(b)11 filed with the OTS by Legacy from December 31, 2010 through the Closing Date.

“Legacy Restricted Stock”shall mean the shares of restricted stock of Legacy issued pursuant to the Legacy Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.

Legacy SEC Reports” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.27.

“Legacy Shareholder Vote” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.4.1.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

“Legacy Shareholders Meeting” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.1.1.

Legacy Stock Option” shall mean an option to purchase shares of Legacy Common Stock granted pursuant to the Legacy Stock Option Plan and the outstanding option agreements, and outstanding as of the date hereof, as set forth inLegacy Disclosure Schedule 3.4.

Legacy Stock Option Plan” shall mean the Legacy Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.

Legacy Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, 10% or more of the capital stock of which is owned, either directly or indirectly, by Legacy or Legacy Banks.

Material Adverse Effect” shall mean, with respect to BHBBHLB or Rome,Legacy, respectively, any effect that (i)(1) is material and adverse to the financial condition, results of operations or business of BHBBHLB and the BHB SubsidiaryBHLB Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or RomeLegacy and the Rome SubsidiaryLegacy Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, respectively, or (ii)(2) materially impairs the ability of either Rome,Legacy, on the one hand, or BHB,BHLB, on the other hand, to perform its obligations under this Agreement or otherwise materially impedes the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; provided, that “Material Adverse Effect” shall not be deemed to include (A)(i) the impact of (x) changes in laws, rules or regulations affecting banks or thrift institutions or their holding companies generally, or interpretations thereof by courts or governmental agencies, (y) changes in GAAP, or (z) changes in regulatory accounting requirements, in any such case applicable to financial institutions or their holding companies generally and not specifically relating to RomeLegacy or any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, or BHBBHLB or any of its Subsidiaries, on the other hand, (B)(ii) the announcement of this Agreement or any action or omission of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary on the one hand, or BHBBHLB or any of its Subsidiaries, on the other hand, required under this Agreement or taken or omitted to be taken with the express written permission of BHBBHLB or Rome,Legacy, respectively, (C)(iii) any changes after the date of this Agreement in general economic or capital market conditions affecting banks or their holding companies generally, (D)(iv) changes or events, after the date hereof, affecting the financial services industry generally and not specifically relating to RomeLegacy or its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, or BHBBHLB or any of its Subsidiaries, on the other hand, provided that a decrease in the trading or market prices of RomeLegacy Common Stock or BHBBHLB Common Stock shall not be considered, by itself, to constitute a “Material Adverse Effect”, (E)(v) changes in the value of the securities or loan portfolio, or any change in the value of the deposits or borrowings, of BHBBHLB or Rome,Legacy, or any of their Subsidiaries, respectively, resulting from a change in interest rates generally, (F) changes(vi) the impact of a requirement contained in Rome’s stock priceany Regulatory Approval, or trading volume (it being agreedas a condition necessary to obtain any Regulatory Approval, that the underlying facts giving rise or contributing to any such changes maythere be a Material Adverse Effect), (G)divesture of not more than $200 million of deposit liabilities, whether from Legacy, BHLB or a combination of the terminationtwo, together with related branch premises and such loans as one of any employeemore Bank Regulators may require in connection therewith, or independent contractors or (H)(vii) in the case of RomeLegacy and its Subsidiaries, the issuance in and of itself of any ordersorder or directivesdirective by any Bank Regulator (it being agreed that the underlying facts giving rise or contributing to the issuance of such orders or directives or the effects of the issuance of the orders or directives may be a Material Adverse Effect).

Materials of Environmental Concern” shall mean pollutants, contaminants, wastes, toxic or hazardous substances, petroleum and petroleum products, and any other materials regulated under Environmental Laws.

“Maximum Amount” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.7.1.

MDOB” shall mean the Massachusetts Division of Banks.

Merger” shall mean the merger of RomeLegacy with and into BHBBHLB pursuant to the terms hereof.

Merger Consideration” shall meanhave the cash or BHB Common Stock, or combination thereof, in an aggregate per share amount to be paid by BHB for each share of Rome Common Stock, asmeaning set forth in Section 3.1.


TABLE OF CONTENTS3.1.3.

Merger Registration Statement” shall mean the registration statement, together with all amendments, filed with the SEC under the Securities Act for the purpose of registering the offer of shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock to be offered to holders of RomeLegacy Common Stock in connection with the Merger.

New Members” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.4.

Non-Election SharesNo Shop Period Start Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.5.6.11.2.

Observer” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.13.

OTS” shall mean the Office of Thrift Supervision.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PBGC” shall mean the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation or any successor thereto.

Person” shall mean any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, trust or “group” (as that term is defined under the Exchange Act).

Pre-Closing” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 10.1.2.2.

Proxy Statement-Prospectus” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.2.1.

Regulatory Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.12.3.

Regulatory ApprovalsApproval”shall mean the approval of any Bank Regulator that is necessary in connection with the consummation of the Merger, the Bank Merger and the related transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

RepresentativeRepresentatives” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.2.6.11.1.

Rights” shall mean puts, calls, warrants, options, conversion, redemption, repurchase or other rights, convertible securities, stock appreciation rights and other arrangements or commitments which obligate an entity to issue or dispose of any of its capital stock or other ownership interests or which provide for compensation based on the equity appreciation of its capital stock.

Rome” shall mean Rome Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal office located at 100 West Dominick Street, Rome, New York 13440.

Rome Benefit Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.13.1.

Rome Common Stock” shall mean the common shares, par value $0.01 per share, of Rome.

Rome Disclosure Schedule” shall mean the collective written disclosure schedules delivered by Rome to BHB pursuant hereto.

Rome ESOP” shall mean the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Rome Bancorp, Inc. or any successor thereto.

Rome Expenses” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.14.

Rome Financial Statements” shall mean (i) the audited consolidated statements of financial condition (including related notes and schedules) of Rome as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows (including related notes and schedules, if any) of Rome for each of the three (3) years ended December 31, 2009, as incorporated by reference in Rome’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 from Rome’s annual report to shareholders for such year and (ii) the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Rome as of the end of each calendar quarter following December 31, 2009, and for the periods then ended, as filed by Rome in its Securities Documents.

Rome Loan Participation” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.15.2.

Rome Loan Property” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.15.2.

Rome Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.13.1.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Option” shall mean an option to purchase shares of Rome Common Stock granted pursuant to the Rome Stock Option Plans and the outstanding option agreements, and outstanding as of the date hereof, as set forth inRome Disclosure Schedule 3.4.

Rome Regulatory Reports” shall mean the Thrift Financial Reports of The Rome Savings Bank, and accompanying schedules (other than such schedules as are required to be kept confidential pursuant to applicable law or regulatory requirements), filed or to be filed with the FDIC with respect to each calendar quarter beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2010, through the Closing Date, and all Annual Reports on Form H-(b)11 and any Current Report on Form H-(b)11 filed with the OTS by Rome from December 31, 2010 through the Closing Date.

Rome Restricted Stock” shall mean the shares of restricted stock of Rome issued pursuant to the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2000 Recognition and Retention Plan and the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan.

Rome Restricted Stock Plans” shall mean the restricted stock plans maintained by Rome for the benefit of the employees of The Rome Savings Bank pursuant to which shares of Rome Restricted Stock may be issued.

Rome SEC Reports” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.27.

Rome Shareholders Meeting” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.1.1.

Rome Stock Option Plans” shall mean the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan and the Rome Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan.

Rome Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, 10% or more of the capital stock of which is owned, either directly or indirectly, by Rome or The Rome Savings Bank.

SEC” shall mean the Securities and Exchange Commission or any successor thereto.

Securities Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Securities Documents” shall mean all reports, offering circulars, proxy statements, registration statements and all similar documents filed pursuant to the Securities Laws.

Securities Laws” shall mean the Securities Act; the Exchange Act; the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended; the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended; the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder.

Settlement Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.6.7.

Shortfall Number” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.6.

Stock Consideration” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.3.

Stock Conversion Number” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.1.

Stock Election Number” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.5.

Stock Election Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.3.

Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, 10% or more of the capital stock of which is owned, either directly or indirectly, except any corporation the stock of which is held in the ordinary course of the lending activities, of either Berkshire Bank or The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, as applicable.

Superior Proposal” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.11.

Surviving Corporation” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1.

Tax” shall mean any federal, state, local, foreign or provincial income, gross receipts, property, sales, service, use, license, lease, excise, franchise, employment, payroll, withholding, employment, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, social security, alternative or added minimum, ad valorem, value added, stamp, business license, occupation, premium, environmental, windfall profit, customs, duties, estimated,


TABLE OF CONTENTS

transfer or excise tax, or any other tax, custom, duty, premium, governmental fee or other assessment or charge of any kind whatsoever, together with any interest, penalty or additional tax imposed by any Governmental Entity.

Tax Return” shall mean any return, declaration, report, claim for refund, or information return or statement relating to Taxes, including any schedule or attachment thereto, and including any amendment thereof.

Termination Date” shall mean JuneNovember 30, 2011.

Termination Fee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.2.2(C).

The Rome Savings Bank” shall mean The Rome Savings Bank, a federally-chartered savings bank, with its principal office located at 100 West Dominick Street, Rome, New York 13440, and which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Rome.

Treasury Stock” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.2.

“Voting Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in the recitals.

401(k) Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.16.

Other terms used herein are defined in the preamble and elsewhere in this Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLE II
THE MERGER

2.1  Merger.

Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time: (a) RomeLegacy shall merge with and into BHB,BHLB, with BHBBHLB as the resulting or surviving corporation (the “Surviving Corporation”); and (b) the separate existence of RomeLegacy shall cease and all of the rights, privileges, powers, franchises, properties, assets, liabilities and obligations of RomeLegacy shall be vested in and assumed by BHB.BHLB. As part of the Merger, each outstanding share of RomeLegacy Common Stock will be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration pursuant to the terms of Article III.

2.2  Closing; Effective Time.

The closing (“Closing”) shall occur no later than the close of business on the fifth (5th) business dayBusiness Day following the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by applicable law) waiver of the conditions set forth in Article IX (other than those conditions that by their terms are to be satisfied at the Closing)Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by applicable law) waiver of those conditions), or such other date that may be agreed to in writing by the parties. The Merger shall be effected by the filing of a certificate of merger with the Delaware DepartmentSecretary of State of the State of Delaware on the day of the Closing (the “Closing Date”), in accordance with the DGCL. The “Effective Time” means the date and time upon which the certificate of merger is filed with the Delaware DepartmentSecretary of State of the State of Delaware, or as otherwise stated in the certificate of merger, in accordance with the DGCL. A pre-closing of the transactions contemplated hereby (the “Pre-Closing”) shall take place at the offices of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., at 10:00 a.m. on the day prior to the Closing Date.

2.3  Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.

The certificate of incorporation and bylaws of BHBBHLB as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Surviving Corporation, until thereafter amended as provided therein and by applicable law.

2.4  Directors and Officers of Surviving Corporation; Advisory Board.

Until changed in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Surviving Corporation,Corporation.

Effective immediately after the officersClosing Date, J. Williar Dunlaevy and directorsone other person who is a director of BHB immediatelyLegacy (as of the date hereof and as of the Effective Time) and who is designated by BHLB and Berkshire Bank prior to the Effective Timemailing of the Proxy Statement-Prospectus pursuant to Section 8.2 (Dunlaevy and such other person, together, the “New Members”) shall be the officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation, in each case until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified. At the Effective Time, BHB agrees to establish an advisory board consisting of certain members of Rome’s Board of Directors. The composition of such advisory board and the fees paidelected to the advisory board members shall be determined by BHB prior to the Effective Time.


TABLE OF CONTENTSBHLB and Berkshire Bank Boards of Directors.

2.5  Effects of the Merger.

At and after the Effective Time, the Merger shall have the effects as set forth in the DGCL.

2.6  Tax Consequences.

It is intended that the Merger shall constitute a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, and that this Agreement shall constitute a “plan of reorganization” as that term is used in Sections 354 and 361 of the Code.

2.7  Possible Alternative Structures.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement and subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Article IX and the prior written consent of Rome, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, prior to the Effective Time BHBBHLB may revise the structure for effecting the Merger described in Section 2.1 or the Bank Merger including, without limitation, by substituting a wholly owned subsidiary for BHBBHLB or Berkshire Bank, as applicable, provided that (i) any such subsidiary shall become a party to, and shall agree to be bound by, the terms of this Agreement; (ii) there are no adverse Federal or state income tax consequences to BHB,BHLB, Berkshire Bank, Rome, The Rome Savings BankLegacy, Legacy Banks or to the BHBBHLB or RomeLegacy shareholders, and nothing would prevent the rendering of the opinions contemplated in Sections 9.2.6 and 9.3.6,9.3.5, as a result of the modification; (iii) the consideration to be paid to the holders of RomeLegacy Common Stock under this Agreement is not thereby changed in kind, value or reduced in amount; and


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(iv) such modification will not delay materially the Closing or jeopardize or delay materially the receipt of any Regulatory Approvals or other consents and approvals relating to the consummation of the Merger or otherwise cause any condition to Closing set forth in Article IX not to be capable of being fulfilled. The parties hereto agree to appropriately amend this Agreement and any related documents in order to reflect any such revised structure.

2.8  Additional Actions.

If, at any time after the Effective Time, BHBBHLB shall consider or be advised that any further deeds, documents, assignments or assurances in law or any other acts are necessary or desirable to (i) vest, perfect or confirm, of record or otherwise, in BHBBHLB its right, title or interest in, to or under any of the rights, properties or assets of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, or (ii) otherwise carry out the purposes of this Agreement, RomeLegacy and its officers and directors shall be deemed to have granted to BHBBHLB an irrevocable power of attorney to execute and deliver, in such official corporate capacities, all such deeds, assignments or assurances in law or any other acts as are necessary or desirable to (a) vest, perfect or confirm, of record or otherwise, in BHBBHLB its right, title or interest in, to or under any of the rights, properties or assets of RomeLegacy or (b) otherwise carry out the purposes of this Agreement, and the officers and directors of the BHBBHLB are authorized in the name of RomeLegacy or otherwise to take any and all such action.

ARTICLE III
CONVERSION OF SHARES

3.1  Conversion of RomeLegacy Common Stock; Merger Consideration.

At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of BHB, RomeBHLB, Legacy or the holders of any of the shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock, the Merger shall be effected in accordance with the following terms:

3.1.1  Each share of BHBBHLB Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall remain issued and outstanding following the Effective Time and shall be unchanged by the Merger.

3.1.2  All shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock held in the treasury of RomeLegacy and each share of RomeLegacy Common Stock owned by BHBBHLB prior to the Effective Time (other than shares held in a fiduciary capacity or in connection with debts previously contracted) (“Treasury Stock”) and each share of RomeLegacy Common Stock held in a trust under the Rome RestrictedLegacy Stock PlansOption Plan but not subject to an award of RomeLegacy Restricted Stock (“Treasury Stock”), shall, at the Effective Time, cease to exist, and such shares, including any Certificates therefor, shall be canceled as promptly as practicable thereafter, and no payment or distribution shall be made in consideration therefor.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

3.1.3  EachMerger Consideration.

(A)  Subject to a potential additional payment or adjustment as provided in Section 3.1.3(B) and 11.1.9, each outstanding share of RomeLegacy Common Stock with respect to which an election to receive BHB Common Stock has been effectively made and not revoked or lost, pursuant to Section 3.2.3 (a “Stock Election”), shall be converted into the right to receive 0.5658(i) 0.56385 (the “Exchange Ratio”) shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3.1.9and (ii) $1.30 (the “StockMerger Consideration”) (collectively, the “Stock Election Shares”). Shares of RomeLegacy Restricted Stock subject to an award shall be treated for all purposes as other outstanding shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock, whether or not such shares are vested prior to the Effective Time.

3.1.4  Each outstanding share of Rome Common Stock(B)  In the event the parties must divest deposit liabilities in order to comply with respecta requirement contained in any Regulatory Approval, or a condition necessary to which an electionobtain any Regulatory Approval (such deposit divestures being referred to receiveas“Required Divestures”), BHLB shall make a cash has been effectively madepayment to Legacy shareholders in the manner and not revoked or lost, pursuant to Section 3.2.3 (athe timing and conditions set forth below to stockholders of Legacy as of the Effective Time equal to the product of:

(i)  (1) the weighted average deposit premium paid for such divested deposits which exceeds 350 basis points (theCash ElectionExcess Amount”), calculating such Excess Amount without regard to any tax imposed upon BHLB under U.S. federal, state, or local tax law as a result of such divestiture (the “Divestiture Tax”),less (2) that portion of the Divestiture Tax allocable to the Excess Amount, and


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(ii)  0.50 (the “Aggregate Divestiture Premium”).

The Aggregate Divestiture Premium shall be converted intopayable within 5 business days after the completion of all Required Divestitures. Each Legacy stockholder as the Effective Date shall have the right to receive a cash payment without interest, equal to $11.25 (the “Cash Consideration”) (collectively,their pro rata portion of the Cash Election Shares”).Aggregate Divestiture Premium based upon the number of shares of Legacy Common Stock held by such Legacy stockholder as of the Effective Time in relation to all other shares of outstanding Legacy Common Stock as of the Effective Time.

3.1.53.1.4  Each outstanding share of Rome Common Stock other than as to which a Cash Election or a Stock Election has been effectively made and not revoked or lost, pursuant to Section 3.2.3 (collectively, “Non-Election Shares”), shall be converted into the right to receive such Stock Consideration and/or Cash Consideration shall be determined in accordance with Section 3.2.

3.1.6  Each outstanding share of RomeLegacy Common Stock, the holder of which has perfected his right to dissent under applicable law and has not effectively withdrawn or lost such right as of the Effective Time (the “Dissenting Shares”), shall not be converted into or represent a right to receive the Merger Consideration hereunder, and the holder thereof shall be entitled only to such rights as are granted by applicable law. RomeLegacy shall give BHBBHLB immediate notice upon receipt by RomeLegacy of any such demands for payment of the fair value of such shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock and of withdrawals of such notice and any other related communications (any shareholder duly making such demand being hereinafter called a “Dissenting Shareholder”), and BHBBHLB shall have the right to participate in all discussions, negotiations and proceedings with respect to any such demands. RomeLegacy shall not, except with the prior written consent of BHB,BHLB, voluntarily make any payment with respect to, or settle or offer to settle, any such demand for payment, or waive any failure to timely deliver a written demand for appraisal or the taking of any other action by such Dissenting Shareholder as may be necessary to perfect appraisal rights under applicable law. Any payments made in respect of Dissenting Shares shall be made by the Surviving Company.

3.1.73.1.5  If any Dissenting Shareholder withdraws or loses (through failure to perfect or otherwise) his right to such payment at or prior to the Effective Time, such holder’s shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock shall be converted into a right to receive the Merger Consideration in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. If such holder withdraws or loses (through failure to perfect or otherwise) his right to such payment after the Effective Time, each share of RomeLegacy Common Stock of such holder shall be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration.

3.1.83.1.6  Upon the Effective Time, outstanding shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and shall cease to exist, and shall thereafter by operation of this Section 3.1 represent only the right to receive the Merger Consideration and any dividends or distributions with respect thereto or any dividends or distributions with a record date prior to the Effective Time that were declared or made by RomeLegacy on such shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock in accordance with the terms of this Agreement on or prior to the Effective Time and which remain unpaid at the Effective Time.

3.1.93.1.7  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no certificates or scrip representing fractional shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock shall be issued upon the surrender for exchange of Certificates, no dividend or distribution with respect to BHBBHLB Common Stock shall be payable on or with respect to any fractional share interests, and such fractional share interests shall not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any other rights of a shareholder of BHB.BHLB. In lieu of the issuance of any such fractional share, BHBBHLB shall pay to each former holder of RomeLegacy Common Stock who otherwise would be entitled to receive a fractional share of BHBBHLB Common Stock, an amount in cash, rounded to the nearest cent and without interest, equal to the product of (i) the fraction of a share to which such holder would otherwise have been entitled and (ii) the average of the daily closing sales prices of a share of BHBBHLB Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the five (5) consecutive


TABLE OF CONTENTS

trading days immediately preceding the Closing Date. For purposes of determining any fractional share interest, all shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock owned by a RomeLegacy shareholder shall be combined so as to calculate the maximum number of whole shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock issuable to such RomeLegacy shareholder.

3.2  Election Procedures.

3.2.1 Holders of3.1.8  If BHLB changes (or the BHLB Board sets a related record of Rome Common Stock may elect to receive shares of BHB Common Stockdate that will occur before the Effective Time for a change in) the number or cash in exchange for their shares of Rome Common Stock. The total numberkind of shares of Rome Common Stock to be converted into Stock Consideration pursuant to this Section 3.2.1 shall be equal to the product obtained by multiplying (x) the number of shares of RomeBHLB Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time by (y) 0.70 (the “Stock Conversion Number”). All other sharesway of Rome Common Stock shall be converted into Cash Consideration.

3.2.2  An election form and other appropriate customary transmittal material in such form as BHB and Rome shall mutually agree (“Election Form”) will be mailed no more than forty (40) business days and no less than twenty (20) business days prior to the Election Deadlinea stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization or on such earlier date as BHB and Rome shall mutually agree (the “Mailing Date”) to each holder of record of Rome Common Stock permitting such holder, subject to the allocation and election procedures set forth in this Section 3.2, (i) to specify the number of shares of Rome Common Stock owned by such holder with respect to which such holder desires to make a Cash Election in accordance with the provision of Section 3.1.4, (ii) to specify the number of shares of Rome Common Stock owned by such holder with respect to which such holder desires to make a Stock Election, in accordance with the provision of Section 3.1.3, or (iii) to indicate that such record holder has no preference as to the receipt of cash or BHB Common Stock for such shares. Holders of record of shares of Rome Common Stock who hold such shares as nominees, trustees or in other representative capacities (a “Representative”) may submit multiple Election Forms, provided that each such Election Form covers all the shares of Rome Common Stock held by each Representative for a particular beneficial owner. Any shares of Rome Common Stock with respect to which the holder thereof shall not, as of the Election Deadline (as defined in Section 3.2.3), have made an election by submission to the Exchange Agent of an effective, properly completed Election Form shall be deemed Non-Election Shares. Any Dissenting Shares shall be deemed shares subject to a Cash Election, and with respect to such shares the holders thereof shall in no event receive consideration comprised of BHB Common Stock. BHB shall make available one or more Election Forms as may reasonably be requested in writing from time to time by all Persons who become holders (or beneficial owners) of Rome Common Stock between the record date for the initial mailing of Election Forms and the close of business on the business day prior to the Election Deadline (as defined in Section 3.2.3), and Rome shall provide to the Exchange Agent all information reasonably necessary for it to perform as specified herein.

3.2.3  The term “Election Deadline”, as used below, shall mean 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on the later of (i) the date of the Rome Shareholders Meeting and (ii) the date that BHB and Rome shall agree is as near as practicable to five (5) business days prior to the expected Closing Date. An election shall have been properly made only if the Exchange Agent shall have actually received a properly completed Election Form by the Election Deadline. Any Election Form may be revoked or changed by the Person submitting such Election Form to the Exchange Agent by written notice to the Exchange Agent only if such notice of revocation or change is actually received by the Exchange Agent at or prior to the Election Deadline. The Certificate or Certificates relating to any revoked Election Form shall be promptly returned without charge to the Person submitting the Election Form to the Exchange Agent. Subject to the terms of this Agreement and of the Election Form, the Exchange Agent shall have discretion to determine whether any election, revocation or change has been properly or timely made and to disregard immaterial defects in the Election Forms, and any good faith decisions of the Exchange Agent regarding such matters shall be binding and conclusive. Neither BHB nor the Exchange Agent shall be under any obligation to notify any Person of any defect in an Election Form.similar transaction,


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3.2.4  No later than three (3) business days afterthen the Merger Consideration (and any other dependent items) will be adjusted proportionately to account for such change. If Legacy changes (or the Legacy Board sets a related record date that will occur before the Effective Time BHB shall causefor a change in) the Exchange Agent to effect the allocation among holders of Rome Common Stock of rights to receive the Cash Consideration and the Stock Consideration as set forth in Sections 3.2.5 and 3.2.6.

3.2.5  If the aggregate number or kind of shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock with respect to which Stock Elections shall have been made (the “Stock Election Number”) exceeds(or Rights thereto) outstanding by way of a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization or similar transaction, then the Stock Conversion Number, then all Cash Election Shares and all Non-Election Shares of each holder thereof shall be converted into the right to receive the CashMerger Consideration and Stock Election Shares of each holder thereof(and any other dependent items) will be converted into the rightadjusted proportionately to receive the Stock Consideration in respect of that number of Stock Election Shares equal to the product obtained by multiplying (x) the number of Stock Election Shares held byaccount for such holder by (y) the fraction, the numerator of which is the Stock Conversion Number and the denominator of which is the Stock Election Number, with the remaining number of such holders’ Stock Election Shares being converted into the right to receive the Cash Consideration.

3.2.6  If the Stock Election Number is less than the Stock Conversion Number (the amount by which the Stock Conversion Number exceeds the Stock Election Number being referred to herein as the “Shortfall Number”), then all Stock Election Shares shall be converted into the right to receive the Stock Consideration and the Non-Election Shares and Cash Election Shares shall be treated in the following manner:

(A)  If the Shortfall Number is less than or equal to the number of Non-Election Shares, then all Cash Election Shares shall be converted into the right to receive the Cash Consideration and the Non-Election Shares of each holder thereof shall convert into the right to receive the Stock Consideration in respect of that number of Non-Election Shares equal to the product obtained by multiplying (x) the number of Non-Election Shares held by such holder by (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the Shortfall Number and the denominator of which is the total number of Non-Election Shares, with the remaining number of such holder’s Non-Election Shares being converted into the right to receive the Cash Consideration; or

(B)  If the Shortfall Number exceeds the number of Non-Election Shares, then all Non-Election Shares shall be converted into the right to receive the Stock Consideration and Cash Election Shares of each holder thereof shall convert into the right to receive the Stock Consideration in respect of that number of Cash Election Shares equal to the product obtained by multiplying (x) the number of Cash Election Shares held by such holder by (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount by which (1) the Shortfall Number exceeds (2) the total number of Non-Election Shares and the denominator of which is the total number of Cash Election Shares, with the remaining number of such holder’s Cash Election Shares being converted into the right to receive the Cash Consideration.change.

3.33.2  Procedures for Exchange of RomeLegacy Common Stock.

3.3.13.2.1  BHBBHLB to Make Merger Consideration Available.  AtAfter the Closing and at or prior to the Effective Time, BHBBHLB shall deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with the Exchange Agent for the benefit of the holders of RomeLegacy Common Stock, for exchange in accordance with this Section 3.3,3.2, an aggregate amount of cash sufficient to pay the aggregate amount of cash payable pursuant to this Article III (including the estimated amount of cash to be paid in lieu of fractional shares of Rome Common Stock) and shall instruct the Exchange Agent to issue such cash and shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock for exchange in accordance with this Section 3.33.2 (such cash and shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock, together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto (without any interest thereon) being hereinafter referred to as the “Exchange Fund”).

3.3.2  3.2.2  Exchange of Certificates.  BHBBHLB shall take all steps necessary to cause the Exchange Agent, not later than five (5) business daysBusiness Days after the Effective Time, to mail to each holder of a Certificate or Certificates who has not previously surrendered such Certificates with an Election Form, a form letter of transmittal for return to the Exchange Agent and instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the Certificates in exchange for the Merger Consideration and cash in lieu of fractional shares into which the RomeLegacy Common Stock represented by such Certificates shall have been converted as a result of the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Merger, if any. The letter of transmittal shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon delivery of the Certificates to the Exchange Agent. Upon proper surrender of a Certificate for exchange and cancellation to the Exchange Agent, together with a properly completed letter of transmittal, duly executed, the holder of such Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor the Merger Consideration and the Certificate so surrendered shall be cancelled. No interest will be paid or accrued on any Cash Consideration or any cash payable in lieu of fractional shares or any unpaid dividends and distributions, if any, payable to holders of Certificates.

3.3.33.2.3  Rights of Certificate Holders after the Effective Time.  The holder of a Certificate that prior to the Merger represented issued and outstanding RomeLegacy Common Stock shall have no rights, after the Effective Time, with respect to such RomeLegacy Common Stock except to surrender the Certificate in exchange for the Merger Consideration as provided in this Agreement. No dividends or other distributions declared after the Effective Time with respect to BHBBHLB Common Stock shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Certificate until the holder thereof shall surrender such Certificate in accordance with this Section 3.3.3.2. After the surrender of a Certificate in accordance with this Section 3.3,3.2, the record holder thereof shall be entitled to receive any such dividends or other distributions, without any interest thereon, which theretofore had become payable with respect to shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock represented by such Certificate.

3.3.43.2.4  Surrender by Persons Other than Record Holders.  If the Person surrendering a Certificate and signing the accompanying letter of transmittal is not the record holder thereof, then it shall be a condition of the payment of the Merger Consideration that: (i) such Certificate is properly endorsed to such Person or is accompanied by appropriate stock powers, in either case signed exactly as the name of the record holder appears on such Certificate, and is otherwise in proper form for transfer, or is accompanied by appropriate evidence of the authority of the Person surrendering such Certificate and signing the letter of transmittal to do so on behalf of the record holder; and (ii) the Person requesting such exchange shall pay to the Exchange Agent in advance any transfer or other similar taxes required by reason of the payment to a Person other than the registered holder of the Certificate surrendered, or required for any other reason, or shall establish to the satisfaction of the Exchange Agent that such tax has been paid or is not payable.


3.3.5TABLE OF CONTENTS

3.2.5  Closing of Transfer Books.  From and after the Closing Date, there shall be no transfers on the stock transfer books of RomeLegacy of the RomeLegacy Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, Certificates representing such shares are presented for transfer to the Exchange Agent, they shall be exchanged for the Merger Consideration and canceled as provided in this Section 3.3.3.2.

3.3.63.2.6  Return of Exchange Fund.  At any time following the six (6)nine (9) month period after the Effective Time, BHBBHLB shall be entitled to require the Exchange Agent to deliver to it any portion of the Exchange Fund which had been made available to the Exchange Agent and not disbursed to holders of Certificates (including, without limitation, all interest and other income received by the Exchange Agent in respect of all funds made available to it), and thereafter such holders shall be entitled to look to BHBBHLB (subject to abandoned property, escheat and other similar laws) with respect to any Merger Consideration that may be payable upon due surrender of the Certificates held by them. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither BHBBHLB nor the Exchange Agent shall be liable to any holder of a Certificate for any Merger Consideration delivered in respect of such Certificate to a public official pursuant to any abandoned property, escheat or other similar law.

3.3.73.2.7  Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Certificates.  In the event any Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and the posting by such Person of a bond in such amount as the Exchange Agent may reasonably direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such Certificate, the Exchange Agent will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the Merger Consideration deliverable in respect thereof.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

3.3.83.2.8  Withholding.  BHBBHLB or the Exchange Agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby to any holder of RomeLegacy Common Stock such amounts as BHBBHLB (or any Affiliate thereof) or the Exchange Agent are required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of such payment under the Code, or any applicable provision of U.S. federal, state, local or non-U.S. tax law. To the extent that such amounts are properly withheld by BHBBHLB or the Exchange Agent, such withheld amounts will be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of the RomeLegacy Common Stock in respect of whom such deduction and withholding were made by BHBBHLB or the Exchange Agent.

3.43.3  Treatment of RomeLegacy Stock Options.

3.3.1  RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 3.43.3.1(a) sets forth all of the outstanding Rome OptionsLegacy stock options (each, a “Legacy Stock Option”) as of the date hereof. No outstanding Rome Options may be exercised betweenEffective as of the date hereofof this Agreement, the Legacy Stock Option Plan shall be amended to delete Section 11 therein but will otherwise remain effective and be maintained by BHLB as of the Effective Time, and all option holders executing Voting Agreements shall agreesubject to not exercise any stock options. Immediately prior torequired BHLB stockholder approval. As of the Effective Time, each Romeall issued and outstanding Legacy Stock Options set forth onLegacy Disclosure Schedule 3.3.1(b)will cease to represent an option to purchase Legacy Common Stock and will be converted automatically into an option to purchase a number of shares of BHLB Common Stock (each, a “BHLB Stock Option whether or not vested or exercisable, shall be terminated and the holder thereof shall be paid by Rome immediately prior”) equal to the Effective Time an amount in cash determined by multiplying (i)product (rounded down to the greaternearest whole share) of (A) the excess, if any, of the Cash Consideration over the applicable per share exercise price of that option or (B) $1.00 by (ii) the number of shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock subject to such Legacy Stock Option and (B) 0.6265, at an exercise price per share (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal to (1) the exercise price of such Legacy Stock Optiondivided by(2) 0.6265.

3.3.2  As of the Effective Time, all issued and outstanding Legacy Stock Options set forth onLegacy Disclosure Schedule 3.3.2, whether or not then exercisable, will be canceled and the holder thereof will receive in exchange therefor, $3.00 multiplied by the number of shares of Legacy Common Stock that the holder could have purchased (assuming full vesting of that option) had that holder exercised that option immediately before the Effective Time,with said Legacy Stock Option, less applicable tax withholding. Subject

3.3.3  Notwithstanding the foregoing, all stock options held by J. Williar Dunlaevy, shall be treated as provided in Section 3.3.1, and for purposes of clarity, shall not receive any cash payment as set forth in Section 3.3.2 of this Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

3.3.4  The shares of BHLB Common Stock to be issued to the foregoing, the Rome Stock Option Plans and all Rome Options issued thereunder shall terminate at the Effective Time. Prior to the Effective Time, Rome shall take such actions as may be necessary to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Section 3.4, including, without limitation, the provision of any notices to holders of RomeLegacy Stock Options as mayshall be provided for inregistered with the Rome Stock Option Plans andSEC under the adoption of any necessary amendments to such plans.Merger Registration Statement.

3.53.4  Bank Merger.

Rome and BHB shall use their reasonable best effortsBHLB intends to cause the merger of The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks with and into Berkshire Bank, with Berkshire Bank as the surviving institution. In addition,institution, but retains the right to hold Legacy Banks as a separate subsidiary. Subject to the foregoing and in BHLB’s sole determination, following the execution and delivery of this Agreement, BHBBHLB will cause Berkshire Bank, and RomeLegacy will cause The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, to execute and deliver an agreement and plan of merger in respect of the Bank Merger. In connection with a merger of Legacy Banks with and into Berkshire Bank, BHLB will, subject to regulatory approval, include the “Legacy” name in the name of Berkshire Bank’s branch offices in Berkshire County, Massachusetts and will continue to do so until the earlier of two (2) years from the Effective Time and the time at which Berkshire Bank rebrands its banking offices in Berkshire County, Massachusetts.

3.5  Headquarters.

BHLB will designate the headquarters of BHLB and Berkshire Bank as 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts.

3.6  Reservation of Shares.

BHBBHLB shall reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of the BHBBHLB Common Stock for the purpose of issuing shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock to the RomeLegacy shareholders in accordance with this Article III.

ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ROME

LEGACY

RomeLegacy represents and warrants to BHBBHLB that the statements contained in this Article IV are correct as of the date of this Agreement and will be correct as of the Closing Date (as though made then and as though the Closing Date were substituted for the date of this Agreement throughout this Article IV), subject to the standard set forth in Section 4.1 and except as set forth in the RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule delivered by RomeLegacy to BHBBHLB on the date hereof, and except as to any representation or warranty which specifically relates to an earlier date, which only need be correct as of such earlier date,provided,however, that disclosure in any section of such RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule shall apply only to the indicated Section of this Agreement except to the extent that it is reasonably apparent that such disclosure is relevant to another section of this Agreement, andprovided,further that notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no item is required to be set forth in such schedule as an exception to a representation or warranty if its absence would not result in the related representation or warranty being deemed untrue or incorrect under the standard established by Section 4.1.Agreement. References to the Knowledge of RomeLegacy shall include the Knowledge of The Rome Savings Bank.


TABLE OF CONTENTSLegacy Banks.

4.1  Standard.

Except as set forth in the following sentence, no representation or warranty of RomeLegacy contained in this Article IV shall be deemed untrue or incorrect, and RomeLegacy shall not be deemed to have breached a representation or warranty, as a consequence of the existence of any fact, circumstance or event unless such fact, circumstance or event, individually or taken together with all other facts, circumstances or events inconsistent with any paragraph of this Article IV, has had or reasonably couldwould be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, disregarding for these purposes (x) any qualification or exception for, or reference to, materiality in any such representation or warranty and (y) any use of the terms “material,” “materially,” “in all material respects,” “Material Adverse Effect” or similar terms or phrases in any such representation or warranty. The foregoing standard shall not apply to representations and warranties contained in Sections 4.2 (other than Sections 4.2.3, 4.2.4 and 4.2.5 and the last sentence of Sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2), Section 4.3 and 4.4.4.4 (other than Section 4.4.2(iii)) and Sections 4.2.3, 4.2.4 and 4.2.5 and Sections 4.3 and 4.4 (other than Section 4.4.2(iii)) shall be true and correct in all material respects.

4.2  Organization.

4.2.1  RomeLegacy is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is duly registered as a savings and loan holding company under the HOLA. RomeLegacy has full corporate power and authority to carry on its business as now conducted. RomeLegacy is duly


TABLE OF CONTENTS

licensed or qualified to do business in the states of the United States and foreign jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or the conduct of its business requires such qualification.

4.2.2  The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks is a federallyMassachusetts chartered savings bank duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the lawsCommonwealth of the United States.Massachusetts. The deposits in The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks are insured by the FDIC to the fullest extent permitted by law, and all premiums and assessments required to be paid in connection therewith have been paid by The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks when due. The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks is a member in good standing of the FHLB and owns the requisite amount of stock of each as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.2.2.

4.2.3  RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.2.3 sets forth each RomeLegacy Subsidiary and its jurisdiction of incorporation or organization. Each RomeLegacy Subsidiary (other than Legacy Banks) is a corporation, limited liability company or other legal entity as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.2.3, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation or organization. Each RomeLegacy Subsidiary is duly licensed or qualified to do business in the states of the United States and foreign jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or conduct of its business requires such qualification.

4.2.4  The respective minute books of Rome, The Rome Savings BankLegacy, Legacy Banks and each other RomeLegacy Subsidiary accurately record all corporate actions of their respective shareholders and boards of directors (including committees).

4.2.5  Prior to the date of this Agreement, RomeLegacy has made available to BHBBHLB true and correct copies of the certificate of incorporation or articles of association, as applicable, and bylaws or other governing documents of Rome, The Rome Savings BankLegacy, Legacy Banks and each other RomeLegacy Subsidiary.

4.3  Capitalization.

4.3.1  The authorized capital stock of RomeLegacy consists of (i) 30,000,00040,000,000 shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock.Stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value (“Legacy Preferred Stock” and collectively with Legacy Common Stock,“Legacy Stock”). As of October 12,December 17, 2010, there were 6,777,551(i) 8,631,732 shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock validly issued and outstanding, fully paid and non-assessable and free of preemptive rights, including 33,660161,470 shares of RomeLegacy Restricted Stock subject to an award, and (ii) 3,118,2061,625,094 shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock held by RomeLegacy as Treasury Stock, but not including 051,774 shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock held in trust under the RomeLegacy Restricted Stock Plans but not subject to an award of RomeLegacy Restricted Stock. RomeLegacy does not own, of record or beneficially, any shares of RomeLegacy Stock which are not Treasury Stock. The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks does not own, of record or beneficially, any shares of RomeLegacy Stock. Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has or is bound by any Rights or other arrangements of any character relating to the purchase, sale or issuance or voting of, or right to receive dividends or other distributions on, any capital stock of Rome,Legacy, or any other security of RomeLegacy or a RomeLegacy Subsidiary or any securities representing the right to vote, purchase or otherwise receive any capital stock of RomeLegacy or a RomeLegacy Subsidiary or any other security of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, other than shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock underlying the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Legacy Stock Options and RomeLegacy Restricted Stock. RomeLegacy has granted options to acquire 354,000735,710 shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock at a weighted average exercise price of $12.84$15.39 per share.RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.3.1 sets forth: the name of each holder of a RomeLegacy Stock Option, identifying the number of shares each such individual may acquire pursuant to the exercise of such options, the plan under which such options were granted, the grant, vesting and expiration dates, and the exercise price relating to the options held, and whether the RomeLegacy Stock Option is an incentive stock option or a nonqualified stock option.RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.3.1 also sets forth the name of each holder of record of RomeLegacy Restricted Stock, the vesting dates and the number of shares held by such Person. All shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock issuable pursuant to the RomeLegacy Stock Option PlansPlan will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable when issued upon the terms and conditions specified in the instruments pursuant to which they are issuable.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.3.2  RomeLegacy owns all of the capital stock of each RomeLegacy Subsidiary, free and clear of any lien or encumbrance. Except for the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries and as set forth inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.3.2, RomeLegacy does not possess, directly or indirectly, any equity interest in any corporate or other legal entity, except for equity interests held in the investment portfolios of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary (which as to any one issuer, do not exceed five percent (5%) of such issuer’s outstanding equity securities) and equity interests held in connection with the lending activities of The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, including stock in the FHLB.

4.3.3  To Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, except as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.3.3, as of the date hereof no Person is the beneficial owner (as defined in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) of five percent (5%) or more of the outstanding shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock.

4.3.4  No bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness having the right to vote on any matters on which Rome’sLegacy’s shareholders may vote have been issued by RomeLegacy and are outstanding.

4.4  Authority; No Violation.

4.4.1  RomeLegacy has full corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and, subject to the receipt of the Regulatory Approvals and the approval of this Agreement by Rome’sLegacy’s shareholders (the “Legacy Shareholder Approval”), to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by RomeLegacy and the completion by RomeLegacy of the transactions contemplated hereby, up to and including the Merger, have been duly and validly approved by the Board of Directors of Rome.Legacy. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by Rome,Legacy, and subject to Legacy Shareholder Approval and the approval byof the shareholders of Rome and the shareholders of BHBBHLB and the receipt of the Regulatory Approvals and due and valid execution and delivery of this Agreement by BHB,BHLB, constitutes the valid and binding obligation of Rome,Legacy, enforceable against RomeLegacy in accordance with its terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to general principles of equity.

4.4.2  (a) Subject to compliance by BHBBHLB with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Rome,Legacy, subject to receipt of Regulatory Approvals and Rome’sLegacy’s and BHB’sBHLB’s compliance with any conditions contained therein, and subject to the receipt of the Legacy Shareholder Approval and the approval of the shareholders of Rome and the shareholders of BHB,BHLB, the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, and (b) compliance by RomeLegacy with the terms and provisions hereof will not (i) conflict with or result in a breach of any provision of the certificate of incorporation or articles of association, as applicable, and bylaws of RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings Bank;Legacy Banks; (ii) violate any statute, code, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, order, writ, decree or injunction applicable to RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks or any of their respective properties or assets; or (iii) violate, conflict with, result in a breach of any provisions of, constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a default) under, result in the termination or amendment of, accelerate the performance required by, or result in a right of termination or acceleration or the creation of any lien, security interest, charge or other encumbrance upon any of the properties or assets of RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks under any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any note, bond, mortgage, indenture, deed of trust, license, lease, agreement or other investment or obligation to which RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks is a party, or by which they or any of their respective properties or assets may be bound or affected.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.5  Consents.

Except for (a) the receipt of the Regulatory Approvals and compliance with any conditions contained therein, (b) compliance with applicable requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and state securities or “blue sky” laws, (c) the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Delaware DepartmentSecretary of State of the State of Delaware, and (d) the Legacy Shareholder Approval and approval of this Agreement by the requisite vote of the shareholders of Rome and the shareholders of BHB (if required),BHLB, no consents, waivers or approvals of, or filings or registrations with, any Governmental Entity or Bank Regulator are necessary, and, to the Knowledge of Rome,Legacy, no consents, waivers or approvals of, or filings or registrations with, any other third parties are necessary, in connection with (x) the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Rome,Legacy, the completion by RomeLegacy of the Merger and the performance by RomeLegacy of its


TABLE OF CONTENTS

obligations hereunder or (y) the execution and delivery of the agreement and plan of merger in respect of the Bank Merger and the completion of the Bank Merger. RomeLegacy has no reason to believe that (i) any Regulatory Approvals or other required consents or approvals will not be received or will include the imposition of any condition (financial or otherwise) or requirement that could reasonably be expected by RomeLegacy to result in a Material Adverse Effect on RomeLegacy and The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, taken as a whole, or BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank, taken as a whole, or that (ii) any public body or authority having jurisdiction over the affairs of RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, the consent or approval of which is not required or pursuant to the rules of which a filing is not required, will object to the completion of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

4.6  Financial Statements.

4.6.1  The RomeLegacy Regulatory Reports have been prepared in all material respects in accordance with applicable regulatory accounting principles and practices throughout the periods covered by such statements, and fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial position, results of operations and changes in shareholders’ equity of RomeLegacy as of and for the periods ended on the dates thereof, in accordance with applicable regulatory accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.

4.6.2  RomeLegacy has previously made available to BHBBHLB the RomeLegacy Financial Statements. The RomeLegacy Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP in all material respects, and (including the related notes where applicable) fairly present in each case in all material respects (subject in the case of the unaudited interim statements to normal year-end adjustments) the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of and for the respective periods ending on the dates thereof, in accordance with GAAP during the periods involved, except as indicated in the notes thereto, or in the case of unaudited statements, as permitted by Form 10-Q.

4.6.3  At the date of the most recent consolidated statement of financial condition included in the RomeLegacy Financial Statements or in the RomeLegacy Regulatory Reports, RomeLegacy did not have any liabilities, obligations or loss contingencies of any nature (whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise) of a type required to be reflected in such RomeLegacy Financial Statements or in the RomeLegacy Regulatory Reports or in the footnotes thereto which are not fully reflected or reserved against therein or fully disclosed in a footnote thereto, except for liabilities, obligations and loss contingencies which are not material individually or in the aggregate or which are incurred in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practice, and subject, in the case of any unaudited statements, to normal, recurring audit adjustments and the absence of footnotes.

4.7  Taxes.

RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries are members of the same affiliated group within the meaning of Code Section 1504(a). Rome,Legacy, on behalf of itself and its Subsidiaries, has timely filed or caused to be filed all Tax Returns (including, but not limited to, those filed on a consolidated, combined or unitary basis) required to have been filed by RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries prior to the date hereof, or requests for extensions to file such returns and reports have been timely filed. All such Tax Returns are true, correct, and complete in all material respects. RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries have timely paid or, prior to the Effective Time will pay, all Taxes, whether or not shown on such returns or reports, due or claimed to be due to any Governmental Entity prior to the Effective Time other than Taxes which are being contested in good faith. RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries have


TABLE OF CONTENTS

declared on their Tax Returns all positions taken therein that could give rise to a substantial underpayment of United States Federal Income Tax within the meaning of Section 6662 of the Code (or any corresponding provision of state or local laws). The accrued but unpaid Taxes of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries did not, as of the most recent RomeLegacy Financial Statements, exceed the reserve for Tax liability (rather than any reserve for deferred Taxes established to reflect timing differences between book and Tax income) set forth on the face of the most recent RomeLegacy balance sheet (rather than in any notes thereto). RomeLegacy and its Subsidiaries are subject to Tax audits in the ordinary course of business. RomeLegacy management does not believe that an adverse resolution to any of such audits of which it has Knowledge would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on Rome. RomeLegacy. Legacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries have not been notified in writing by any jurisdiction that the jurisdiction believes that RomeLegacy or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries were required to file any Tax Return in such jurisdiction that was


TABLE OF CONTENTS

not filed. Neither RomeLegacy nor any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries (A) has been a member of a group with which they have filed or been included in a combined, consolidated or unitary income Tax Return other than a group the common parent of which was RomeLegacy or (B) has any liability for the Taxes of any Person (other than RomeLegacy or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries) under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local, or non-U.S. law), as a transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise. As of the date hereof, all deficiencies proposed in writing as a result of any audits have been paid or settled. There are no written claims or assessments pending against RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary for any alleged deficiency in any Tax, and neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has been notified in writing of any proposed Tax claims or assessments against RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary. RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries each have complied with all applicable laws relating to the payment, collection and withholding of amounts on account of Taxes, have duly and timely withheld, collected and paid over to the appropriate taxing authority all amounts required to be so withheld and paid under all applicable laws, and have duly and timely filed all Tax Returns with respect to such withheld Taxes, within the time prescribed under any applicable law. RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries have delivered to BHBBHLB true and complete copies of all Income Tax Returns of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries for taxable periods ending on or after December 31, 2005.2007. Neither RomeLegacy nor any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries is or has been a party to any “reportable transaction,” as defined in Code § 6707A(c)(1) and Treas. Reg. § 1.6011-4(b). Neither RomeLegacy nor any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries has distributed stock of another Person, or has had its stock distributed by another Person, in a transaction that was purported or intended to be governed in whole or in part by Code § 355 or Code § 361. Neither RomeLegacy nor any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries has been a United States real property holding corporation within the meaning of Code § 897(c)(2) during the applicable period specified in Code § 897(c)(1)(A)(ii).

4.8  No Material Adverse Effect.

Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has suffered any Material Adverse Effect since December 31, 2009 and, to Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, no event has occurred or circumstance arisen since that date which, in the aggregate, has had or is reasonably likelywould be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Rome.Legacy.

4.9  Material Contracts; Leases; Defaults.

4.9.1  Except as set forth inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.9.1, neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is a party to or subject to: (i) any employment, consulting or severance contract or arrangement with any past or present officer, director, employee or consultant of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, except for “at will” arrangements; (ii) any plan, arrangement or contract providing for bonuses, pensions, options, deferred compensation, retirement payments, profit sharing or similar arrangements for or with any past or present officers, directors, employees or consultants of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary; (iii) any collective bargaining agreement with any labor union relating to employees of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary; (iv) any agreement which by its terms limits or affects the payment of dividends by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary; (v) any instrument evidencing or related to indebtedness for borrowed money in excess of $50,000, whether directly or indirectly, by way of purchase money obligation, conditional sale, lease purchase, guaranty or otherwise, in respect of which RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is an obligor to any Person, which instrument evidences or relates to indebtedness other than deposits, FHLB advances with a term to maturity not in excess of one (1) year, repurchase agreements, bankers’ acceptances, and transactions in “federal funds” or which contains financial covenants or other non-customary restrictions (other than those relating to the payment of principal and interest when due) which would be applicable on or after the Closing Date to RomeLegacy or any


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rome Legacy Subsidiary; (vi) any other agreement, written or oral, which is not terminable without cause on sixty (60) days’ notice or less without penalty or payment, or that obligates RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary for the payment of more than $30,000 annually or for the payment of more than $50,000 over its remaining term; or (vii) any agreement (other than this Agreement), contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding (whether written or oral) that materially restricts or limits the conduct of business by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary.

4.9.2  Each real estate lease that will require the consent of the lessor or its agent as a result of the Merger or the Bank Merger by virtue of the terms of any such lease, is listed inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.9.2 identifying the section of the lease that contains such prohibition or restriction. Subject to any consents that may be required as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, to its


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Knowledge neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is in material default under any material contract, agreement, commitment, arrangement, lease, insurance policy or other instrument to which it is a party, by which its assets, business, or operations may be bound or affected, or under which it or its assets, business, or operations receive benefits, and there has not occurred any event that, with the lapse of time or the giving of notice or both, would constitute such a default.default and all such material contracts, agreements, commitments, arrangements, leases, insurance policies and other instruments are listed onLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.9.2 ..

4.9.3  True and correct copies of agreements, contracts, arrangements and instruments referred to in Section 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 have been made available to BHBBHLB on or before the date hereof, are listed onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedules 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 and are in full force and effect without modification on the date hereof. Except as set forth inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.9.3, no such agreement, plan, contract, or arrangement (i) provides for acceleration of the vesting of benefits or payments due thereunder upon the occurrence of a change in ownership or control of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary or upon the occurrence of a subsequent event; (ii) requires RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary to provide a benefit in the form of RomeLegacy Common Stock or determined by reference to the value of RomeLegacy Common Stock or (iii) contains provisions which permit an employee, director or independent contractor to terminate such agreement or arrangement without cause and continue to accrue future benefits thereunder.

4.10  Ownership of Property; Insurance Coverage.

4.10.1  RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary has good and, as to real property, marketable title to all assets and properties owned by RomeLegacy or such RomeLegacy Subsidiary, as applicable, in the conduct of its businesses, whether such assets and properties are real or personal, tangible or intangible, including assets and property reflected in the most recent consolidated statement of financial condition contained in the RomeLegacy Financial Statements or acquired subsequent thereto (except to the extent that such assets and properties have been disposed of in the ordinary course of business, since the date of such consolidated statement of financial condition), subject to no encumbrances, liens, mortgages, security interests or pledges, except (i) those items which secure liabilities for public or statutory obligations or any discount with, borrowing from or other obligations to FHLB, inter-bank credit facilities, reverse repurchase agreements or any transaction by a RomeLegacy Subsidiary acting in a fiduciary capacity, and (ii) statutory liens for amounts not yet delinquent or which are being contested in good faith. RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, as lessee, have the right under valid and existing leases of real and personal properties used by RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries in the conduct of their businesses to occupy or use all such properties as presently occupied and used by each of them. Such existing leases and commitments to lease constitute or will constitute operating leases for both tax and financial accounting purposes and the lease expense and minimum rental commitments with respect to such leases and lease commitments are as disclosed in all material respects in the notes to the RomeLegacy Financial Statements.

4.10.2  With respect to all material agreements pursuant to which RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has purchased securities subject to an agreement to resell, if any, RomeLegacy or such RomeLegacy Subsidiary, as the case may be, has a lien or security interest (which to Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge is a valid, perfected first lien) in the securities or other collateral securing the repurchase agreement, and the value of such collateral equals or exceeds the amount of the debt secured thereby.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.10.3  RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary currently maintain insurance considered by each of them to be reasonable for their respective operations. Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, has received notice from any insurance carrier on or before the date hereof that (i) such insurance will be canceled or that coverage thereunder will be reduced or eliminated, or (ii) premium costs with respect to such policies of insurance will be substantially increased. Except as listed onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.10.3, there are presently no claims pending under such policies of insurance and no notices of claim have been given by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary under such policies. All such insurance is valid and enforceable and in full force and effect (other than insurance that expires in accordance with its terms), and within the last three (3) years RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary has received each type of insurance coverage for which it has applied and during such periods has not been denied indemnification for any claims submitted under any of its insurance policies.RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.10.3 identifies


TABLE OF CONTENTS

all policies of insurance maintained by RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary, including the name of the insurer, the policy number, the type of policy and any applicable deductibles, as well as the other matters required to be disclosed under this Section 4.10.3. RomeLegacy has made available to BHBBHLB copies of all of the policies listed onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.10.3.

4.11  Legal Proceedings.

Except as set forth onRome Disclosure Schedule 4.11, neither Rome nor any Rome SubsidiaryThere is a party to any, and there are no suit, action, investigation or proceeding pending or, to Rome’sits Knowledge, threatened legal, administrative, arbitrationagainst or other proceedings, claims (whether assertedaffecting Legacy or unasserted), actions or governmental investigations or inquiriesany of its Subsidiaries (and it is not aware of any nature, (i) against Romefacts that reasonably could be expected to be the basis for any such suit, action or proceeding) (1) that involves a Governmental Entity or Bank Regulator, or (2) that, individually or in the aggregate, is (A) material to it and its Subsidiaries’ businesses or, after the Effective Time, BHLB’s or any Rome Subsidiary, (ii)of its Subsidiaries’ businesses, or (B) reasonably likely to which Romeprevent or any Rome Subsidiary’s assets aredelay it from performing its obligations under, or may be subject, (iii) challenging the validity or propriety of any ofconsummating the transactions contemplated by, this Agreement,Agreement. There is no injunction, order, award, judgment, settlement, decree or (iv) which reasonably could be expected to adversely affectregulatory restriction imposed upon or entered into by Legacy, any of its Subsidiaries or the abilityassets of Romeit or any Rome Subsidiary to perform under this Agreement.of its Subsidiaries.

4.12  Compliance Withwith Applicable Law.

Except as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.12 and in Section 4.15:

4.12.1  To Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary is in compliance in all material respects with all applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes, laws, regulations, ordinances, rules, judgments, orders or decrees applicable to it, its properties, assets and deposits, its business, its conduct of business and its relationship with its employees, including, without limitation, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Consumer Credit Protection Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collections Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”), the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and all other applicable fair lending laws and other laws relating to discriminatory business practices, and neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has received any written notice to the contrary.

4.12.2  RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary has all material permits, licenses, authorizations, orders and approvals of, and has made all filings, applications and registrations with, all Governmental Entities and Bank Regulators that are required in order to permit it to own or lease its properties and to conduct its business as presently conducted; all such permits, licenses, certificates of authority, orders and approvals are in full force and effect and, to the Knowledge of Rome,Legacy, no suspension or cancellation of any such permit, license, certificate, order or approval is threatened or will result from the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, subject to obtaining the Regulatory Approvals.

4.12.3  For the period beginning January 1, 2007, neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has received any written notification or any other communication from any Bank Regulator (i) asserting that RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is not in material compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances which such Bank Regulator enforces; (ii) threatening to revoke any license, franchise, permit or governmental authorization; (iii) requiring or threatening to require RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, or indicating that RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary may be required, to enter into a cease and desist order, agreement or memorandum of understanding or any other agreement with any federal or state


TABLE OF CONTENTS

governmental agency or authority which is charged with the supervision or regulation of banks, or engages in the insurance of bank deposits, restricting or limiting, or purporting to restrict or limit the operations of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, including without limitation any restriction on the payment of dividends; or (iv) directing, restricting or limiting, or purporting to direct, restrict or limit the operations of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary (any such notice, communication, memorandum, agreement or order described in this sentence is hereinafter referred to as a “Regulatory Agreement”). Neither RomeExcept as disclosed in Legacy Disclosure Schedule 4.12.3, neither Legacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has consented to or entered into any Regulatory Agreement that is currently in effect. RomeLegacy has disclosed to BHBBHLB its most recent regulatory ratings.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.13  Employee Benefit Plans.

4.13.1  RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.13.1 contains a list of all written and unwritten pension, retirement, profit-sharing, thrift, savings, deferred compensation, stock option, employee stock ownership, employee stock purchase, restricted stock, severance pay, retention, vacation, bonus or other incentive plans, all employment, change in control, consulting, severance and retention agreements, all other written employee programs, arrangements or agreements, all medical, vision, dental, disability, life insurance, workers’ compensation, employee assistance or other health or welfare plans, and all other employee benefit or fringe benefit plans, including “employee benefit plans” as that term is defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA, currently adopted, maintained by, sponsored in whole or in part by, or contributed to by RomeLegacy or any of its ERISA Affiliates for the benefit of employees, former employees, retirees (or the dependents, including spouses, of the foregoing), directors, independent contractors or other beneficiaries of Romeservice providers to Legacy and under which employees, former employees, retirees, dependents, spouses, directors, or other beneficiariesservice providers of RomeLegacy are eligible to participate (collectively, the “RomeLegacy Benefit Plans”). RomeLegacy has furnished or otherwise made available to BHBBHLB true and complete copies of (i) the plan documents and summary plan descriptions for each written RomeLegacy Benefit Plan, (ii) a summary of each unwritten RomeLegacy Benefit Plan (if applicable), (iii) the annual report (Form 5500 series) for the three (3) most recent years for each RomeLegacy Benefit Plan (if applicable), (iv) the actuarial valuation reports with respect to each tax-qualified RomeLegacy Benefit Plan that is a defined benefit pension plan for the three (3) most recent years, (v) all related trust agreements, insurance contracts or other funding agreements which currently implement the RomeLegacy Benefit Plans (if applicable), (vi) the most recent IRS determination letter with respect to each tax-qualified RomeLegacy Benefit Plan (or, for a RomeLegacy Benefit Plan maintained under a pre-approved prototype or volume submitter plan, the IRS determination letter on such pre-approved plan) and (vii) all substantive correspondence relating to any liability of or non-compliance relating to any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan addressed to or received from the IRS, the Department of Labor or any other Governmental Entity within the past five (5)three (3) years.Rome Disclosure Schedule 4.13.1 identifies each Rome Each Legacy Benefit Plan that may be subject to Section 409A of the Code (“RomeLegacy Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan”) and the aggregate amounts deferred, if any, under each such Rome Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan as of the date specified therein. Each Rome Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan has been maintained and operated in compliance with Section 409A of the Code such that no Taxes under Section 409A of the Code may be imposed on participants in such plans.

4.13.2  All RomeLegacy Benefit Plans are in material compliance with (and have been managed and administrated in accordance with) the applicable terms of ERISA, the Code and any other applicable laws. Except as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.13.2, each RomeLegacy Benefit Plan governed by ERISA that is intended to be a qualified retirement plan under Section 401(a) of the Code has either (i) received a favorable determination letter from the IRS (and RomeLegacy is not aware of any circumstances likely to result in revocation of any such favorable determination letter) or timely application has been made therefore, or (ii) is maintained under a prototype plan which has been approved by the IRS and is entitled to rely upon the IRS National Office opinion letter issued to the prototype plan sponsor. To the Knowledge of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, there exists no fact which would adversely affect the qualification of any of the RomeLegacy Benefit Plans intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code, or any threatened or pending claim against any of the RomeLegacy Benefit Plans or their fiduciaries by any participant, beneficiary or Governmental Entity.


TABLE OF CONTENTSEntity (other than routine claims for benefits).

4.13.3  Except as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.13.3, no “defined benefit plan” (as defined in Section 414(j) of the Code) has been maintained at any time by RomeLegacy or any of its ERISA Affiliates for the benefit of the employees or former employees of RomeLegacy or its Subsidiaries.

4.13.4  Within the last six (6) years, neither RomeLegacy nor any of its ERISA Affiliates maintained or had any obligation to contribute to a RomeLegacy Benefit Plan which is a “multiemployer plan” within the meaning of Section 3(37) of ERISA, and within the last six (6) years neither RomeLegacy nor any of its ERISA Affiliates has incurred any withdrawal liability within the meaning of Section 4201 of ERISA to any such “multiemployer plan.” Neither RomeLegacy nor any of its ERISA Affiliates has incurred any unsatisfied liability (other than PBGC premiums) to the PBGC, the IRS or any other individual or entity under Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code, and no event or condition exists that could


TABLE OF CONTENTS

reasonably be expected to result in the imposition of any liability on RomeLegacy or any of its ERISA Affiliates under such provisions or that could reasonably be expected to have an adverse effect on BHBBHLB or Berkshire Bank.

4.13.5  RomeLegacy has complied in all material respects with the notice and continuation requirements of Parts 6 and 7 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA and Section 4980B of the Code (“COBRA”), and the regulations thereunder. All reports, statements, returns and other information required to be furnished or filed with respect to RomeLegacy Benefit Plans have been timely furnished, filed or both in accordance with Sections 101 through 105 of ERISA and Sections 6057 through 6059 of the Code, and they are true, correct and complete. To Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, records with respect to RomeLegacy Benefit Plans have been maintained in compliance with Section 107 of ERISA. To Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, neither RomeLegacy nor any other fiduciary (as that term is defined in Section 3(21) of ERISA) with respect to any of RomeLegacy Benefit Plans has any liability for any breach of any fiduciary duties under Sections 404, 405 or 409 of ERISA. No Legacy Benefit Plan fails to meet the applicable requirements of Section 105(h)(2) of the Code (determined without regard to whether such Legacy Benefit Plan is self-insured).

4.13.6  RomeLegacy has not, with respect to any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan, nor, to Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, has any administrator of any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan, the related trusts or any trustee thereof, engaged in any prohibited transaction which would subject Rome,Legacy, any ERISA Affiliate of Rome,Legacy, or any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan to a Tax or penalty on prohibited transactions imposed by ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code, or to any other liability under ERISA.

4.13.7  Except as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.13.7, RomeLegacy has no liability for retiree health and life benefits under any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan other than any benefits required under COBRA or similar state laws.

4.13.8  Except as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.13.8, neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will (A) result in any payment (including severance) becoming due to any director or any employee of RomeLegacy from RomeLegacy under any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan, (B) increase any benefits otherwise payable under any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan or (C) result in any acceleration of the time of payment or vesting of any such benefit. Except as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.13.8, no payment which in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is or may reasonably be expected to be made by, from or with respect to any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan, either alone or in conjunction with any other payment will or could properly be characterized as an “excess parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Code on which an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code is payable or will or could, either individually or collectively, provide for any payment by RomeLegacy or any of its ERISA Affiliates that would not be deductible under Code Section 162(m).

4.13.9  The actuarial present values of all accrued RomeLegacy Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plans (including, to the extent applicable, entitlements under any executive compensation, supplemental retirement, or employment agreement) of employees and former employees of RomeLegacy and their respective beneficiaries, other than entitlements accrued pursuant to funded retirement plans subject to the provisions of Section 412 of the Code or Section 302 of ERISA, have been fully reflected on the RomeLegacy Financial Statements to the extent required by and in accordance with GAAP.

4.13.10  There is not, and has not been, any trust or fund maintained by or contributed to by RomeLegacy or its employees to fund an employee benefit plan which would constitute a Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association or a “welfare benefit fund” within the meaning of Section 419(a) of the Code.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.13.11  No claim, lawsuit, arbitration or other action has been asserted or instituted or, to the Knowledge of Rome,Legacy, has been threatened or is anticipated, against any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan (other than routine claims for benefits and appeals of such claims), RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary or any director, officer or employee thereof, or any of the assets of any trust of any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.14  Brokers, Finders and Financial Advisors.

Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, nor any of their respective officers, directors, employees or agents, has employed any broker, finder or financial advisor in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or incurred any liability or commitment for any fees or commissions to any such Person in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement except for the retention of Sandler O’NeillKeefe Bruyette & Partners, L.P.Woods, Inc. by RomeLegacy and the fee payable pursuant thereto. A true and correct copy of the engagement agreement with Sandler O’NeillKeefe Bruyette & Partners, L.P.Woods, Inc., setting forth the fee payable to Sandler O’NeillKeefe Bruyette & Partners, L.P.Woods, Inc. for its services rendered to RomeLegacy in connection with the Merger and transactions contemplated by this Agreement, is attached toRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.14.

4.15  Environmental Matters.

4.15.1  Except as may be set forth inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.15, with respect to RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary:

(A)  To the Knowledge of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, each of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, and the RomeLegacy Loan Properties (as defined in Section 4.15.2) are, and have been, in material compliance with any Environmental Laws;

(B)  Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has received written notice in the last five (5) years that there is any material suit, claim, action, demand, executive or administrative order, directive, request for information, investigation or proceeding pending and, to the Knowledge of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, no such action is threatened, before any court, governmental agency or other forum against them or any RomeLegacy Loan Property (x) for alleged noncompliance (including by any predecessor) with, or liability under, any Environmental Law or (y) relating to the presence of or release into the environment of any Materials of Environmental Concern, whether or not occurring at or on a site owned, leased or operated by Rome,Legacy, or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries;

(C)  To the Knowledge of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, the properties currently owned or operated by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary (including, without limitation, soil, groundwater or surface water on, or under the properties, and buildings thereon) are not contaminated with and do not otherwise contain any Materials of Environmental Concern other than in amounts permitted under applicable Environmental Law or which are de minimis in nature and extent;

(D)  There are no underground storage tanks on, in or under any properties owned or operated by RomeLegacy or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries or to the Knowledge of Rome and the Rome Subsidiaries, any RomeLegacy Loan Property, and no underground storage tanks have been closed or removed from any properties owned or operated by RomeLegacy or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries or to the Knowledge of Rome and the Rome Subsidiaries, any RomeLegacy Loan Property except as in compliance with Environmental Laws; and

(E)  During the period of (a) Rome’sLegacy’s or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries’ ownership or operation of any of their respective current properties or (b) Rome’sLegacy’s or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries’ participation in the management of any RomeLegacy Loan Property, to the Knowledge of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, there has been no material contamination by or material release of Materials of Environmental Concern in, on, under or affecting such properties. To the Knowledge of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, prior to the period of (x) Rome’sLegacy’s or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries’ ownership or operation of any of their respective current properties or (y) Rome’sLegacy’s or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries’ participation in the management of any RomeLegacy Loan Property, there was no material contamination by or release of Materials of Environmental Concern in, on, under or affecting such properties.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(F)  Neither RomeLegacy nor any other RomeLegacy Subsidiary has conducted any environmental studies during the past five (5) years (other than Phase I studies or Phase II studies which did not indicate any contamination of the environment by Materials of Environmental Concern above reportable levels) with respect to any properties owned or leased by it or any of its Subsidiaries, or with respect to any RomeLegacy Loan Property.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.15.2  For purposes of this Section 4.15, “RomeLegacy Loan Property” means any property in which RomeLegacy or a RomeLegacy Subsidiary presently holds a direct or indirect security interest securing to a loan or other extension of credit made by them, including through a RomeLegacy Loan Participation, and “RomeLegacy Loan Participation” means a participation interest in a loan or other extension of credit other than by RomeLegacy or a RomeLegacy Subsidiary.

4.16  Loan Portfolio.

4.16.1  The allowances for loan losses reflected in the notes to Rome’sLegacy’s audited consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were, and the allowance for loan losses shown in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for periods ending after December 31, 2009 were, or will be, adequate, as of the dates thereof, under GAAP.

4.16.2  RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.16.2 sets forth a listing, as of the most recently available date (and in no event earlier than June 30, 2010), by account, of: (A) all loans (including loan participations) of The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks that have been accelerated during the past twelve (12) months; (B) with respect to all commercial loans (including commercial real estate loans), all notification letters and other written communications (excluding any electronic communications) from The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks to any borrowers, customers or other parties during the past twelve (12) months wherein The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks has requested or demanded that actions be taken to correct existing defaults or facts or circumstances which may become defaults; (C) each borrower, customer or other party which has notified The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks during the past twelve (12) months of, or has asserted against RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, in each case in writing, any “lender liability” or similar claim, and, to the Knowledge of RomeLegacy and The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, each borrower, customer or other party which has given RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks any oral notification of, or orally asserted to or against RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, any such claim; and (D) all loans, (1) that are contractually past due ninety (90) days or more in the payment of principal and/or interest, (2) that are on non-accrual status, (3) that as of June 30, 2010 are classified as “Other Loans Specially Mentioned,” “Special Mention,” “Substandard,” “Doubtful,” “Loss,” “Classified,” “Criticized,” “Watch list” or words of similar import, together with the principal amount of and accrued and unpaid interest on each such Loan and the identity of the obligor thereunder, (4) where a reasonable doubt exists as to the timely future collectibility of principal and/or interest, whether or not interest is still accruing or the loans are less than ninety (90) days past due, (5) where the interest rate terms have been reduced and/or the maturity dates have been extended subsequent to the agreement under which the loan was originally created due to concerns regarding the borrower’s ability to pay in accordance with such initial terms, or (6) where a specific reserve allocation exists in connection therewith; and (E) all other assets classified by RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks as real estate acquired through foreclosure or in lieu of foreclosure, including in-substance foreclosures, and all other assets currently held that were acquired through foreclosure or in lieu of foreclosure.RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.16.2 may exclude any individual loan with a principal outstanding balance of less than $50,000, provided thatRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.16.2 includes, for each category described, the aggregate amount of individual loans with a principal outstanding balance of less than $50,000 that has been excluded.

4.16.3  All loans receivable (including discounts) and accrued interest entered on the books of RomeLegacy and The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks arose out of bona fide arm’s-length transactions, were made for good and valuable consideration in the ordinary course of Rome’sLegacy’s and The Rome Savings Bank’sLegacy Banks’ respective businesses, and the notes or other evidences of indebtedness with respect to such loans (including discounts) are true and genuine and are what they purport to be. The loans, discounts and the accrued interest reflected on the books of RomeLegacy and The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks are subject to no defenses, set-offs or counterclaims (including, without limitation, those afforded by usury or truth-in-lending laws), except


TABLE OF CONTENTS

as may be provided by bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally or by general principles of equity. All such loans are owned by RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks free and clear of any liens.

4.16.4  The notes and other evidences of indebtedness evidencing the loans described above, and all pledges, mortgages, deeds of trust and other collateral documents or security instruments relating thereto are valid, true and genuine, and what they purport to be.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.17  Related Party Transactions.

Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is a party to any transaction (including any loan or other credit accommodation) with any Affiliate of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, except as set forth inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.17 or as described in Rome’sLegacy’s proxy statement dated April 1,March 31, 2010 distributed in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders held on May 5,12, 2010. Except as described in such proxy statement or inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.17, all such transactions (a) were made in the ordinary course of business, (b) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other Persons, and (c) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. No loan or credit accommodation to any Affiliate of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is presently in default or, during the three (3)-year period prior to the date of this Agreement, has been in default or has been restructured, modified or extended. Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has been notified that principal or interest with respect to any such loan or other credit accommodation will not be paid when due or that the loan grade classification accorded such loan or credit accommodation is inappropriate.

4.18  Deposits.

Except as set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.18, none of the deposits of The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks as of August 2,June 30, 2010 are a “brokered deposit” as defined in 12 C.F.R. Section 337.6(a)(2).

4.19  Board Approval.

The approval of the Board of Directors of Rome constitutesLegacy determined that the approvalMerger is fair to, and in the best interests of, Legacy and its stockholders, approved and declared advisable this Agreement, the Merger, the Bank Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby, resolved to recommend adoption of this Agreement to the holders of Legacy Common Stock, and directed that this Agreement be submitted to the holders of Legacy Common Stock for purposestheir adoption. The Board of Directors of Legacy has taken all action so that BHLB and Berkshire Bank will not be an “interested stockholder” or prohibited from entering into or consummating a “business combination” with Legacy (in each case as such term is used in Section 203 of the Delaware Law. To the Knowledge of Rome, except for Section 203DGCL) as a result of the Delaware Law (which has been rendered inapplicable), no state takeover statute is applicable toexecution of this Agreement or the Merger andconsummation of the transactions in the manner contemplated by this Agreement.hereby.

4.20  Registration Obligations.

Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is under any obligation, contingent or otherwise, which will survive the Effective Time by reason of any agreement to register any transaction involving any of its securities under the Securities Act.

4.21  Risk Management Instruments.

All interest rate swaps, caps, floors, option agreements, futures and forward contracts and other similar risk management arrangements, whether entered into for Rome’sLegacy’s own account, or for the account of one or more of Rome’sLegacy’s Subsidiaries or their customers, in force and effect as of November 30, 2010 (all of which are set forth inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.21), were entered into in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and regulatory policies, and to the Knowledge of RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary, with counterparties believed to be financially responsible at the time; and to Rome’sLegacy’s and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary’s Knowledge each of them constitutes the valid and legally binding obligation of RomeLegacy or such RomeLegacy Subsidiary, enforceable in accordance with its terms (except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights or by general equity principles), and is in full force and effect. Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, nor any other party thereto, is in breach of any of its obligations under any such agreement or arrangement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.22  Fairness Opinion.

RomeLegacy has received an opinion, a copy of which will be provided to BHB,BHLB promptly following the date of this Agreement, from Sandler O’NeillKeefe Bruyette & Partners, L.P.Woods, Inc. to the effect that, subject to the terms, conditions and qualifications set forth therein, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be received by the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

shareholders of RomeLegacy pursuant to this Agreement is fair to such shareholders from a financial point of view. Such opinion has not been amended or rescinded as of the date of this Agreement.

4.23  Intellectual Property.

RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary owns or, to Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, possesses valid and binding licenses and other rights (subject to expirations in accordance with their terms) to use all patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trade names, computer software, service marks and trademarks used in its respective business, each without payment, and neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary has received any notice of breach or conflict with respect thereto that asserts the rights of others. RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary have performed all the obligations required to be performed, and are not in default in any respect, under any contract, agreement, arrangement or commitment relating to any of the foregoing.

4.24  Duties as Fiduciary.

The Rome Savings Bank (i) is not presently engaged in any line of business which requires it to act in a “fiduciary capacity” to any other Person and (ii)Except as set forth onLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.24, Legacy Banks has, if required by virtue of any line of business in which it is or previously was engaged in a “fiduciary capacity,” to its Knowledge performed all of its duties in a fashion that complied with all applicable laws, regulations, orders, agreements, wills, instruments, and common law standards in effect at that time. The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks has not received notice of any claim, allegation, or complaint from any Person that The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks failed to perform these duties in a manner that complied with all applicable laws, regulations, orders, agreements, wills, instruments, and common law standards, except for notices involving matters that have been resolved and any cost of such resolution is reflected in Rome’sLegacy’s Financial Statements. For purposes of this Section 4.24, the term “fiduciary capacity” (i) shall mean (a) acting as trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, transfer agent, guardian, assignee, receiver, or custodian under a uniform gifts to minors act and (b) possessing investment discretion on behalf of another, and (ii) shall exclude The Rome Savings Bank’sLegacy Banks’ capacity with respect to individual retirement accounts or the RomeLegacy Benefit Plans.

4.25  Employees; Labor Matters.

4.25.1  RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.25.1 sets forth the following information with respect to each employee of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries as of July 31,September 30, 2010: job location, job title, current annual base salary, and years of service, and the amount of incentive compensation or bonus paid for the prior three (3) years.

4.25.2  There are no labor or collective bargaining agreements to which RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is a party. There is no union organizing effort pending or, to the Knowledge of Rome,Legacy, threatened against RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary. There is no labor strike, labor dispute (other than routine employee grievances that are not related to union employees), work slowdown, stoppage or lockout pending or, to the Knowledge of Rome,Legacy, threatened against RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary. There is no unfair labor practice or labor arbitration proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of Rome,Legacy, threatened against RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary (other than routine employee grievances that are not related to union employees). RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary is in compliance with all applicable laws respecting employment and employment practices, terms and conditions of employment and wages and hours, and are not engaged in any unfair labor practice. Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is a party to, or bound by, any agreement for the leasing of employees.

4.25.3  To Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, all Persons who at any time since January 1, 2007 have been treated as independent contractors by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary for Tax purposes have met the criteria to be so treated under all applicable federal, state and local Tax laws, rules and regulations.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.26  RomeLegacy Information Supplied.

The information relating to RomeLegacy and any RomeLegacy Subsidiary to be contained in the Merger Registration Statement, or in any other document filed with any Bank Regulator or other Governmental Entity in connection herewith, will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they are made, not misleading.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.27  Securities Documents.

Since January 1, 2007, RomeLegacy has filed with the SEC all forms, reports, schedules, registration statements, definitive proxy statements and information statements or other filings (“RomeLegacy SEC Reports”) required to be filed by it with the SEC. As of their respective dates, the RomeLegacy SEC Reports complied as to form with the requirements of the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, as applicable, and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder in all material respects. As of their respective dates and as of the date any information from the RomeLegacy SEC Reports has been incorporated by reference, the RomeLegacy SEC Reports did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. RomeLegacy has filed all material contracts, agreements and other documents or instruments required to be filed as exhibits to the RomeLegacy SEC Reports.

4.28  Internal Controls.

None of Rome’s or any Rome Subsidiary’s4.28.1  The records, systems, controls, data orand information of Legacy and its Subsidiaries are recorded, stored, maintained and operated or otherwise wholly or partly dependent on or held by anyunder means (including any electronic, mechanical or photographic process, whether computerized or not) whichthat are under the exclusive ownership and direct control of Legacy or its Subsidiaries or accountants (including all means of access thereto and therefrom) are not under their exclusive, except for any non-exclusive ownership and direct control. Rome hasnon-direct control that would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the system of internal accounting controls described in the following sentence. Legacy and its Subsidiaries have devised and maintainsmaintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAPGAAP. Legacy has designed and implemented disclosure controls and procedures (within the meaning of Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to it and its Subsidiaries is made known to its management by others within those entities as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to make the certifications required by the Exchange Act and Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

4.28.2  Legacy’s management has completed an assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting in compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the year ended December 31, 2009, and such assessment concluded that such controls were effective. It has previously disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to its auditors and the applicable provisionsaudit committee of the Securities ActLegacy board: (A) any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting and (B) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in its internal controls over financial reporting.

4.28.3  Since December 31, 2007, (A) neither Legacy nor any of its Subsidiaries nor, to its knowledge, any director, officer, employee, auditor, accountant or representative of Legacy or any of its Subsidiaries has received or otherwise had or obtained knowledge of any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim, whether written or oral, regarding the Exchange Act.accounting or auditing practices, procedures, methodologies or methods (including with respect to loan loss reserves, write-downs, charge-offs and accruals) of it or any of its subsidiaries or their respective internal accounting controls, including any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim that it or nay of its subsidiaries has engaged in questionable accounting or auditing practices, and (B) no attorney representing Legacy or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by it or any of its Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a material violation of securities laws, breach of fiduciary to duty or similar violation by Legacy or any of its officers, directors, employees or agents to its board of directors or any committee thereof or to any of its directors officers.

4.29  Bank Owned Life Insurance.

RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary has obtained the written consent of each employee on whose behalf bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) has been purchased. The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks has taken all actions necessary to comply with applicable law in connection with its purchase of BOLI.RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.29 sets


TABLE OF CONTENTS

forth all BOLI owned by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, a breakdown of the cash surrender values on each policy, the regulatory purpose for which each policy was purchased, the beneficiaries of such policy and a list of the lives insured thereunder.

4.30  Clocktower Insurance Agency Incorporated.

Clocktower has not been engaged in the insurance agency business or any other business since at least 1995. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Clocktower owned and leased commercial real estate located at 8483 Seneca Turnpike, New Hartford, New York until the property’s sale in January 2010.

4.31  Stock Transfer Records.

The stockStock transfer books and records of RomeLegacy are materially complete and accurate.

ARTICLE V
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BHB

BHLB

BHBBHLB represents and warrants to RomeLegacy that the statements contained in this Article V are correct as of the date of this Agreement and will be correct as of the Closing Date (as though made then and as though the Closing Date were substituted for the date of this Agreement throughout this Article V), subject to the standard set forth in Section 5.1 and except as set forth in the BHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule delivered by BHBBHLB to RomeLegacy on the date hereof, and except as to any representation or warranty which specifically relates to an earlier date, which only need be so correct as of such earlier date,provided,however, that disclosure in any section of such BHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule shall apply only to the indicated Section of this Agreement except to the extent that it is reasonably apparent that such disclosure is relevant to another section of this


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Agreement, andprovided,further that notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no item is required to be set forth in such schedule as an exception to a representation or warranty if its absence would not result in the related representation or warranty being deemed untrue or incorrect under the standard established by Section 5.1. BHB has made a good faith, diligent effort to ensure that the disclosure on each schedule of the BHB Disclosure Schedule corresponds to the Section referenced herein. Agreement. References to the Knowledge of BHBBHLB shall include the Knowledge of Berkshire Bank.

5.1  Standard.

Except as set forth in the following sentence, no representation or warranty of BHBBHLB contained in this Article V shall be deemed untrue or incorrect, and BHBBHLB shall not be deemed to have breached a representation or warranty, as a consequence of the existence of any fact, circumstance or event unless such fact, circumstance or event, individually or taken together with all other facts, circumstances or events inconsistent with any paragraph of this Article V, has had or reasonably could be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, disregarding for these purposes (x) any qualification or exception for, or reference to, materiality in any such representation or warranty and (y) any use of the terms “material,” “materially,” “in all material respects,” “Material Adverse Effect” or similar terms or phrases in any such representation or warranty. The foregoing standard shall not apply to representations and warranties contained in Sections 5.2 (other than Sections 5.2.3, 5.2.4, and 5.2.5 and the last sentence of Sections 5.2.1 and 5.2.2), Section 5.3 or 5.4.and 5.4 (other than Section 5.4.2(iii)) and Sections 5.2.3, 5.2.4, and 5.2.5 and Sections 5.3 and 5.4 (other than Section 5.4.2(iii)) shall be true and correct in all material respects.

5.2  Organization.

5.2.1  BHBBHLB is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is duly registered as a savings and loan holding company under the HOLA. BHBBHLB has full corporate power and authority to carry on its business as now conducted and is duly licensed or qualified to do business in the states of the United States and foreign jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or the conduct of its business requires such qualification.

5.2.2  Berkshire Bank is a Massachusetts savings bank duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The deposits in Berkshire Bank are insured by the FDIC to the fullest extent permitted by law, and all premiums and assessments required to be paid in connection therewith have been paid when due. Berkshire Bank is a member in good standing of the FHLB and owns the requisite amount of stock of each as set forth onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.2.2.

5.2.3  BHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.2.3 sets forth each BHLB Subsidiary and its jurisdiction of incorporation or organization. Each BHLB Subsidiary (other than Berkshire Bank) is a corporation, limited liability company or other legal entity as set forth onBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.2.3, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation or organization. Each BHLB Subsidiary is duly licensed or qualified to do business in the states of the United States and foreign jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or conduct of its business requires such qualification.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.2.4  The respective minute books of BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank accurately record all corporate actions of their respective shareholders and Boards of Directors (including committees).

5.2.45.2.5  Prior to the date of this Agreement, BHBBHLB has made available to RomeLegacy true and correct copies of the certificate of incorporation or articles of association, as applicable, and bylaws or other governing documents of BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank and each other BHBBHLB Subsidiary.

5.3  Capitalization.

5.3.1  The authorized capital stock of BHBBHLB consists of (i) 26,000,000 shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock and (ii) 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share (“BHBBHLB Preferred Stock” and collectively with the BHBBHLB Common Stock, the “BHBBHLB Stock”). As of October 12,December 17, 2010, there are (i) 14,038,711 shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock validly issued and outstanding, fully paid and non-assessable and free of preemptive rights, (ii) 1,801,810 shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock held by BHBBHLB as treasury stock, and (iii) no shares of BHBBHLB Preferred Stock outstanding. Berkshire Bank does not own, of record or beneficially, any shares of BHBBHLB Stock, other than shares held as treasury stock. Neither BHBBHLB nor any BHBBHLB Subsidiary has or is bound by any Rights or other arrangements of any character relating to the purchase, sale or issuance or voting of, or right to receive dividends or other distributions on, any capital stock of BHB,BHLB, or any other security of BHBBHLB or an BHBBHLB Subsidiary or any securities representing the right to vote, purchase or otherwise receive any capital stock of BHBBHLB or an BHBBHLB Subsidiary or any other security of BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary, other than shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock underlying the options and restricted stock granted pursuant to benefit plans maintained by BHB. BHBBHLB. BHLB has granted options to acquire 200,883190,000 shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock.Stock at a weighted average exercise price of $22.97 per share. All shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock issuable


TABLE OF CONTENTS

pursuant to option plans maintained by BHBBHLB will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable when issued upon the terms and conditions specified in the instruments pursuant to which they are issuable.

5.3.2  BHBBHLB owns all of the capital stock of each BHBBHLB Subsidiary free and clear of all liens, security interests, pledges, charges, encumbrances, agreements and restrictions of any kind or nature. Except for the BHLB Subsidiaries and as set forth inBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.3.2, BHLB as of the date of this Agreement does not possess, directly or indirectly, any equity interest in any corporate or other legal entity, except for equity interests held in the investment portfolios of BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary (which as to any one issuer, do not exceed five percent (5%) of such issuer’s outstanding equity securities) and equity interests held in connection with the lending activities of Berkshire Bank, including stock in the FHLB.

5.3.3  To BHLB’s Knowledge, except as set forth onBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.3.3, as of the date hereof, no Person is the beneficial owner (as defined in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) of five percent (5%) or more of the outstanding shares of BHLB Common Stock.

5.3.4  No bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness having the right to vote on any matters on which BHB’sBHLB’s shareholders may vote have been issued by BHBBHLB and are outstanding.

5.4  Authority; No Violation.

5.4.1  BHBBHLB has full corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and, subject to receipt of the Regulatory Approvals and the approval of this Agreement by BHB’sBHLB’s shareholders, to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by BHBBHLB and the completion by BHBBHLB of the transactions contemplated hereby, up to and including the Merger, have been duly and validly approved by the Board of Directors of BHB.BHLB. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by BHB,BHLB, and subject to the receipt of the Regulatory Approvals, approval by the shareholders of RomeLegacy Shareholder Approval and the shareholders of BHB (if required),BHLB, and due and valid execution and delivery of this Agreement by Rome,Legacy, constitutes the valid and binding obligations of BHB,BHLB, enforceable against BHBBHLB in accordance with its terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to general principles of equity.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.4.2  (a) Subject to compliance of RomeLegacy with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the execution and delivery of this Agreement by BHB,BHLB, subject to receipt of the Regulatory Approvals, and compliance by RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB with any conditions contained therein, and subject to the receipt of the Legacy Shareholder Approval and the approval of the shareholders of Rome and the shareholders of BHB (if required),BHLB, the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, and (b) compliance by BHBBHLB with the terms and provisions hereof will not (i) conflict with or result in a breach of any provision of the certificate of incorporation or articles of association, as applicable, and bylaws of BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary; (ii) violate any statute, code, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, order, writ, decree or injunction applicable to BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary or any of their respective properties or assets; or (iii) violate, conflict with, result in a breach of any provisions of, constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a default) under, result in the termination or amendment of, accelerate the performance required by, or result in a right of termination or acceleration or the creation of any lien, security interest, charge or other encumbrance upon any of the properties or assets of BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary under any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any note, bond, mortgage, indenture, deed of trust, license, lease, agreement or other investment or obligation to which BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary is a party, or by which they or any of their respective properties or assets may be bound or affected.

5.5  Consents.

Except for (a) the receipt of the Regulatory Approvals and compliance with any conditions contained therein, (b) compliance with applicable requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and state securities or “blue sky” laws, (c) the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Delaware DepartmentSecretary of State of the State of Delaware, (d) the filing with the SEC of (i) the Merger Registration Statement and (ii) such reports under Sections 13(a), 13(d), 13(g) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act as may be required in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and the obtaining from the SEC of such orders as may be required in connection therewith, (e) notification of the listing of BHBBHLB Common Stock to be issued in the Merger on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and (f) the approval of this Agreement by the requisite voteLegacy Shareholder Approval and the approval of the shareholders of Rome and the shareholders of BHB (if required),BHLB, no consents, waivers or approvals of, or filings or registrations with, any Governmental Entity or Bank Regulator are necessary, and, to the Knowledge of BHB,BHLB, no consents, waivers or approvals of, or filings or registrations with, any other third parties are necessary, in connection with (x) the execution and delivery of this Agreement by BHB,BHLB, the completion by BHBBHLB of the Merger and the performance by BHBBHLB of its obligations hereunder or (y) the execution and delivery of the agreement and plan of merger in respect of the Bank Merger and the completion of the Bank


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Merger. BHBBHLB has no reason to believe that (i) any Regulatory Approvals or other required consents or approvals will not be received or will include the imposition of any condition (financial or otherwise) or requirement that could reasonably be expected by BHBBHLB to result in a Material Adverse Effect on BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank, taken as a whole, or RomeLegacy and The Rome Savings Bank,Legacy Banks, taken as a whole, or that (ii) any public body or authority having jurisdiction over the affairs of BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank, the consent or approval of which is not required or pursuant to the rules of which a filing is not required, will object to the completion of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

5.6  Financial Statements.

5.6.1  The BHBBHLB Regulatory Reports have been prepared in all material respects in accordance with applicable regulatory accounting principles and practices throughout the periods covered by such statements, and fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial position, results of operations and changes in shareholders’ equity of BHBBHLB as of and for the periods ended on the dates thereof, in accordance with applicable regulatory accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.

5.6.2  BHBBHLB has previously made available to RomeLegacy the BHBBHLB Financial Statements covering periods ended prior to the date hereof. The BHBBHLB Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP in all material respects, and (including the related notes where applicable) fairly present in each case in all material respects (subject in the case of the unaudited interim statements to normal year-end adjustments) the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of BHBBHLB and the Berkshire Bank on a consolidated basis as of and for the respective periods ending on the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

dates thereof, in accordance with GAAP during the periods involved, except as indicated in the notes thereto, or in the case of unaudited statements, as permitted by Form 10-Q.

5.6.3  At the date of the most recent consolidated statement of financial condition included in the BHBBHLB Financial Statements BHBor in the BHLB Regulatory Reports, BHLB did not have any liabilities, obligations or loss contingencies of any nature (whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise) of a type required to be reflected in such BHBBHLB Financial Statements or in the footnotes thereto which are not fully reflected or reserved against therein or fully disclosed in a footnote thereto, except for liabilities, obligations and loss contingencies which are not material individually or in the aggregate or which are incurred in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practice, and subject, in the case of any unaudited statements, to normal, recurring audit adjustments and the absence of footnotes.

5.7  Tax Matters.

5.7.1  Except as provided in this Agreement, neither BHBBHLB nor any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates has taken or agreed to take any action, has failed to take any action or knows of any fact, agreement, plan or other circumstance that could reasonably be expected to prevent the Merger from qualifying as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries are members of the same affiliated group within the meaning of Code Section 1504(a). BHLB, on behalf of itself and its Subsidiaries, has timely filed or caused to be filed all Tax Returns (including, but not limited to, those filed on a consolidated, combined or unitary basis) required to have been filed by BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries prior to the date hereof, or requests for extensions to file such returns and reports have been timely filed. All such Tax Returns are true, correct, and complete in all material respects. BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries have timely paid or, prior to the Effective Time will pay, all Taxes, whether or not shown on such returns or reports, due or claimed to be due to any Governmental Entity prior to the Effective Time other than Taxes which are being contested in good faith. BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries have declared on their Tax Returns all positions taken therein that could give rise to a substantial underpayment of United States Federal Income Tax within the meaning of Section 6662 of the Code (or any corresponding provision of state or local laws). The unpaid accrued but unpaid Taxes of BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries did not, as of the most recent BHLB Financial Statements, exceed the reserve for Tax liability (rather than any reserve for deferred Taxes established to reflect timing differences between book and Tax income) set forth on the face of the most recent BHLB balance sheet (rather than in any notes thereto). BHLB and its Subsidiaries are subject to Tax audits in the ordinary course of business. BHLB management does not believe that an adverse resolution to any of such audits of which it has Knowledge would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on BHLB.

BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries have not been notified in writing by any jurisdiction that the jurisdiction believes that BHLB or any of the BHLB Subsidiaries were required to file any Tax Return in such jurisdiction that was not filed. Neither BHLB nor any of the BHLB Subsidiaries (A) has been a member of a group with which they have filed or been included in a combined, consolidated or unitary income Tax Return other than a group the common parent of which was BHLB or (B) has any liability for the Taxes of any Person (other than BHLB or any of the BHLB Subsidiaries) under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local, or non-U.S. law), as a transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise. As of the date hereof, all deficiencies proposed in writing as a result of any audits have been paid or settled. There are no written claims or assessments pending against BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary for any alleged deficiency in any Tax, and neither BHLB nor any BHLB Subsidiary has been notified in writing of any proposed Tax claims or assessments against BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary. BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries each have duly and timely withheld, collected and paid over to the appropriate taxing authority all amounts required to be so withheld and paid under all applicable laws, and have duly and timely filed all Tax Returns with respect to such withheld Taxes, within the time prescribed under any applicable law. BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries have delivered to Legacy true and complete copies of all Tax Returns of BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries for taxable periods ending on or after December 31, 2005. Neither BHLB nor any of the BHLB Subsidiaries is or has been a party to any “reportable transaction,” as defined in Code § 6707A(c)(1) and Treas. Reg. § 1.6011-4(b). Neither BHLB nor any of the BHLB Subsidiaries has distributed stock of another Person, or has had its stock distributed by another Person, in a transaction that was purported or intended


TABLE OF CONTENTS

to be governed in whole or in part by Code § 355 or Code § 361. Neither BHLB nor any of the BHLB Subsidiaries has been a United States real property holding corporation within the meaning of Code § 897(c)(2) during the applicable period specified in Code § 897(c)(1)(A)(ii).

5.8  No Material Adverse Effect.

Neither BHBBHLB nor any BHBBHLB Subsidiary has suffered any Material Adverse Effect since December 31, 2009 and, to BHB’sBHLB’s Knowledge, no event has occurred or circumstance arisen since that date which, in the aggregate, has had or is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on BHB.BHLB.

5.9  Ownership of Property; Insurance Coverage.

5.9.1  Except as set forth onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.9.1, BHBBHLB and each BHBBHLB Subsidiary has good and, as to real property, marketable title to all assets and properties owned by BHBBHLB or such BHBBHLB Subsidiary, as applicable, in the conduct of its businesses, whether such assets and properties are real or personal, tangible or intangible, including assets and property reflected in the most recent consolidated statement of financial condition contained in the BHBBHLB Financial Statements or acquired subsequent thereto (except to the extent that such assets and properties have been disposed of in the ordinary course of business, since the date of such consolidated statement of financial condition), subject to no encumbrances, liens, mortgages, security interests or pledges, except (i) those items which secure liabilities for public or statutory obligations or any discount with, borrowing from or other obligations to FHLB, inter-bank credit facilities, reverse repurchase agreements or any transaction by an BHB


TABLE OF CONTENTS

BHLB Subsidiary acting in a fiduciary capacity, and (ii) statutory liens for amounts not yet delinquent or which are being contested in good faith. BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries, as lessee, have the right under valid and existing leases of real and personal properties used by BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries in the conduct of their businesses to occupy or use all such properties as presently occupied and used by each of them. Such existing leases and commitments to lease constitute or will constitute operating leases for both tax and financial accounting purposes and the lease expense and minimum rental commitments with respect to such leases and lease commitments are as disclosed in all material respects in the notes to the BHBBHLB Financial Statements.

5.9.2  BHBWith respect to all material agreements pursuant to which BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary has purchased securities subject to an agreement to resell, if any, BHLB or such BHLB Subsidiary, as the case may be, has a lien or security interest (which to BHLB’s Knowledge is a valid, perfected first lien) in the securities or other collateral securing the repurchase agreement, and the value of such collateral equals or exceeds the amount of the debt secured thereby.

5.9.3  BHLB and each BHBBHLB Subsidiary currently maintain insurance considered by each of them to be reasonable for their respective operations. Neither BHBBHLB nor any BHBBHLB Subsidiary, has received notice from any insurance carrier on or before the date hereof that (i) such insurance will be canceled or that coverage thereunder will be reduced or eliminated, or (ii) premium costs with respect to such policies of insurance will be substantially increased. Except as listed onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.9.25.9.3, there are presently no claims pending under such policies of insurance and no notices of claim have been given by BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary under such policies. All such insurance is valid and enforceable and in full force and effect (other than insurance that expires in accordance with its terms), and within the last three (3) years BHBBHLB and each BHBBHLB Subsidiary has received each type of insurance coverage for which it has applied and during such periods has not been denied indemnification for any claims submitted under any of its insurance policies.BHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.9.25.9.3 identifies all policies of insurance maintained by BHBBHLB and each BHBBHLB Subsidiary, including the name of the insurer, the policy number, the type of policy and any applicable deductibles, as well as the other matters required to be disclosed under this Section 5.9.2. BHB5.9.3. BHLB has made available to RomeLegacy copies of all of the policies listed onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.9.25.9.3.

5.10  Legal Proceedings.

Except as disclosed in Item 3 of Part I of BHB’s Annual Reportset forth on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2010, neither BHB nor any BHB SubsidiaryBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.10, there is a party to any, and there are no suit, action, investigation or proceeding pending or, to the Knowledgeits knowledge, threatened against or affecting BHLB or any of BHB, threatened, legal, administrative, arbitration or other proceedings, claims (whether asserted or unasserted), actions or governmental investigations or inquiriesits Subsidiaries (and it is not aware of any nature (i) against BHBfacts that reasonably could be expected to form the basis for any such suit, action or


TABLE OF CONTENTS

proceeding) (1) that involves a Governmental Entity or Bank Regulator, or (2) that, individually or in the aggregate, is (A) material to it and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or reasonably likely to result in a restriction on its or any BHB Subsidiary, (ii) to which BHBof its Subsidiaries’ businesses or, or after the Effective Time, BHLB’s or any BHB Subsidiary’s assets areof its Subsidiaries’ businesses, or may be subject, (iii) challenging the validity(B) reasonably likely to prevent or propriety of any ofdelay it from performing its obligations under, or consummating the transactions contemplated by, this Agreement,Agreement. There is no injunction, order, award, judgment, settlement, decree or (iv) which could reasonably be expected to adversely affectregulatory restriction imposed upon or entered into by BHLB, any of its Subsidiaries or the abilityassets of BHBit or any BHB Subsidiary to perform under this Agreement.of its Subsidiaries.

5.11  Compliance Withwith Applicable Law.

Except as set forth onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.11:

5.11.1  To BHB’sBHLB’s Knowledge, BHBBHLB and each BHBBHLB Subsidiary is in compliance in all material respects with all applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes, laws, regulations, ordinances, rules, judgments, orders or decrees applicable to it, its properties, assets and deposits, its business, its conduct of business and its relationship with its employees, including, without limitation, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Consumer Credit Protection Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collections Act, the Fair Housing Act, the CRA, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and all other applicable fair lending laws and other laws relating to discriminatory business practices, and neither BHBBHLB nor any BHBBHLB Subsidiary has received any written notice to the contrary.

5.11.2  BHBBHLB and each BHBBHLB Subsidiary has all material permits, licenses, authorizations, orders and approvals of, and has made all filings, applications and registrations with, all Governmental Entities and Bank Regulators that are required in order to permit it to own or lease its properties and to conduct its business as presently conducted; all such permits, licenses, certificates of authority, orders and approvals are in full force and effect and, to the Knowledge of BHB,BHLB, no suspension or cancellation of any such


TABLE OF CONTENTS

permit, license, certificate, order or approval is threatened or will result from the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, subject to obtaining the approvals set forth in Section 8.3.

5.11.3  For the period beginning January 1, 2007, neither BHBBHLB nor any BHBBHLB Subsidiary has received any written notification or any other communication from any Bank Regulator or Insurance Regulator (i) asserting that BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary is not in material compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances which such Bank Regulator or Insurance Regulator enforces; (ii) threatening to revoke any license, franchise, permit or governmental authorization; (iii) requiring or threatening to require BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary, or indicating that BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary may be required, to enter into a cease and desist order, agreement or memorandum of understanding or any other agreement with any federal or state governmental agency or authority which is charged with the supervision or regulation of banks, savings and loan holding companies or insurance agencies, or engages in the insurance of bank deposits, restricting or limiting, or purporting to restrict or limit the operations of BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary, including without limitation any restriction on the payment of dividends; or (iv) directing, restricting or limiting, or purporting to direct, restrict or limit the operations of BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary. Neither BHBBHLB nor any BHBBHLB Subsidiary has consented to or entered into any Regulatory Agreement that is currently in effect. The most recent regulatory rating given to Berkshire Bank as to compliance with the CRA is “Satisfactory” or better.

5.12  Employee Benefit Plans.

5.12.1  BHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.12.1 contains a list of all written and unwritten pension, retirement, profit-sharing, thrift, savings, deferred compensation, stock option, employee stock ownership, employee stock purchase, restricted stock, severance pay, retention, vacation, bonus or other incentive plans, all employment, change in control, consulting, severance and retention agreements, all other written employee programs, arrangements or agreements, all medical, vision, dental, disability, life insurance, workers’ compensation, employee assistance or other health or welfare plans, and all other employee benefit or fringe benefit plans, including “employee benefit plans” as that term is defined in


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 3(3) of ERISA, currently adopted, maintained by, sponsored in whole or in part by, or contributed to by BHBBHLB or any of its ERISA Affiliates for the benefit of employees, former employees, retirees (or the dependents, including spouses, of the foregoing), directors, independent contractors or other beneficiaries of BHBservice providers to BHLB and under which employees, former employees, retirees, dependents, spouses, directors, or other beneficiariesservice providers of BHBBHLB are eligible to participate (collectively, the “BHBBHLB Benefit Plans”). BHBBHLB has furnished or otherwise made available to RomeLegacy true and complete copies of (i) the plan documents and summary plan descriptions for each written BHBBHLB Benefit Plan, (ii) a summary of each unwritten BHBBHLB Benefit Plan (if any)applicable), (iii) the actuarial valuation reports with respect to each tax-qualified BHBBHLB Benefit Plan that is a defined benefit pension plan for the two (2)three (3) most recent years, (iv) all related trust agreements, insurance contracts or other funding agreements which currently implement the BHBBHLB Benefit Plans (if applicable), and (v) the most recent IRS determination letter with respect to each tax-qualified BHBBHLB Benefit Plan (or, for an BHBa BHLB Benefit Plan maintained under a pre-approved prototype or volume submitter plan, the IRS determination letter on such pre-approved plan). and (vi) all substantive correspondence relating to any liability of or non-compliance relating to any BHLB Benefit Plan addressed to or received from the IRS, the Department of Labor or any other Governmental Entity within the past three (3) years. Each BHBBHLB Benefit Plan that may be subject to Section 409A of the Code (“BHBBHLB Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan”) has been maintained and operated in compliance with Section 409A of the Code such that no Taxes under Section 409A of the Code may be imposed on participants in such plans.

5.12.2  All BHBBHLB Benefit Plans are in material compliance with (and have been managed and administrated in accordance with) the applicable terms of ERISA, the Code and any other applicable laws. Except as set forth onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.12.2, each BHBBHLB Benefit Plan governed by ERISA that is intended to be a qualified retirement plan under Section 401(a) of the Code has either (i) received a favorable determination letter from the IRS (and BHBBHLB is not aware of any circumstances likely to result in revocation of any such favorable determination letter) or timely application has been made therefore, or (ii) is maintained under a prototype plan which has been approved by the IRS and is entitled to rely upon the IRS National Office opinion letter issued to the prototype plan sponsor. To the Knowledge of BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries, there exists no fact which would adversely affect the qualification of any of the BHBBHLB Benefit Plans intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code,


TABLE OF CONTENTS

or any threatened or pending claim against any of the BHBBHLB Benefit Plans or their fiduciaries by any participant, beneficiary or Governmental Entity.Entity (other than routine claims for benefits).

5.12.3  Except as set forth onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.12.3, no “defined benefit plan” (as defined in Section 414(j) of the Code) has been maintained at any time by BHBBHLB or any of its ERISA Affiliates for the benefit of the employees or former employees of BHBBHLB or its Subsidiaries.

5.12.4  Within the last six (6) years, neither BHBBHLB nor any of its ERISA Affiliates maintained or had any obligation to contribute to a BHBBHLB Benefit Plan which is a “multiemployer plan” within the meaning of Section 3(37) of ERISA, and within the last six (6) years neither BHBBHLB nor any of its ERISA Affiliates has incurred any withdrawal liability within the meaning of Section 4201 of ERISA to any such “multiemployer plan.” Neither BHBBHLB nor any of its ERISA Affiliates has incurred any unsatisfied liability (other than PBGC premiums) to the PBGC, the IRS or any other individual or entity under Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code, and no event or condition exists that could reasonably be expected to result in the imposition of any liability on BHBBHLB or any of its ERISA Affiliates under such provisions or that could reasonably be expected to have an adverse effect on BHBBHLB or Berkshire Bank.

5.12.5  BHBBHLB has complied in all material respects with the notice and continuation requirements of Parts 6 and 7 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA and Section 4980B of the Code (“COBRA”), and the regulations thereunder. All reports, statements, returns and other information required to be furnished or filed with respect to BHBBHLB Benefit Plans have been timely furnished, filed or both in accordance with Sections 101 through 105 of ERISA and Sections 6057 through 6059 of the Code, and they are true, correct and complete. To BHB’sBHLB’s Knowledge, records with respect to BHBBHLB Benefit Plans have been maintained in compliance with Section 107 of ERISA. To BHB’sBHLB’s Knowledge, neither BHBBHLB nor any other fiduciary (as that term is defined in Section 3(21) of ERISA) with respect to any of BHBBHLB Benefit


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Plans has any liability for any breach of any fiduciary duties under Sections 404, 405 or 409 of ERISA. No BHLB Benefit Plan fails to meet the applicable requirements of Section 105(h)(2) of the Code (determined without regard to whether such BHLB Benefit Plan is self-insured).

5.12.6  BHBBHLB has not, with respect to any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan, nor, to BHB’sBHLB’s Knowledge, has any administrator of any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan, the related trusts or any trustee thereof, engaged in any prohibited transaction which would subject BHB,BHLB, any ERISA Affiliate of BHBBHLB, or any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan to a Tax or penalty on prohibited transactions imposed by ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code, or to any other liability under ERISA.

5.12.7  Except as set forth onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.12.7, BHBBHLB has no liability for retiree health and life benefits under any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan other than any benefits required under COBRA or similar state law.laws.

5.12.8  Except as set forth onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.12.8, neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will (A) result in any payment (including severance) becoming due to any director or any employee of BHBBHLB from BHBBHLB under any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan, (B) increase any benefits otherwise payable under any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan or (C) result in any acceleration of the time of payment or vesting of any such benefit. Except as set forth onBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.12.8, no such payment which in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is or may reasonably be expected to be made by, from or with respect to any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan, either alone or in conjunction with any other payment will or could properly be characterized as an “excess parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Code on which an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code is payable or will or could, either individually or collectively, provide for any payment by BHBBHLB or any of its ERISA Affiliates that would not be deductible under Code Section 162(m).

5.12.9  The actuarial present values of all BHBaccrued BHLB Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plans (including, to the extent applicable, entitlements under any executive compensation, supplemental retirement, or employment agreement) of employees and former employees of BHBBHLB and their respective beneficiaries, other than entitlements accrued pursuant to funded retirement plans subject to the provisions of Section 412 of the Code or Section 302 of ERISA, have been fully reflected on the BHBBHLB Financial Statements to the extent required by and in accordance with GAAP.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.12.10  There is not, and has not been, any trust or fund maintained by or contributed to by BHBBHLB or its employees to fund an employee benefit plan which would constitute a Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association or a “welfare benefit fund” within the meaning of Section 419(a) of the Code.

5.12.11  No claim, lawsuit, arbitration or other action has been asserted or instituted or, to the Knowledge of BHB,BHLB, has been threatened or is anticipated, against any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan (other than routine claims for benefits and appeals of such claims), BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary or any director, officer or employee thereof, or any of the assets of any trust of any BHBBHLB Benefit Plan.

5.13  Brokers, Finders and Financial Advisors.

Neither BHBBHLB nor any BHBBHLB Subsidiary, nor any of their respective officers, directors, employees or agents, has employed any broker, finder or financial advisor in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or incurred any liability or commitment for any fees or commissions to any such Person in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except for the retention of Stifel, NicolausSandler O’Neill & Company, IncorporatedPartners, L.P. by BHBBHLB and the fee payable thereto. A true and correct copy of the engagement agreement with Stifel, NicolausSandler O’Neill & Company, Incorporated,Partners, L.P., setting forth the fee payable to Stifel, NicolausSandler O’Neill & Company, IncorporatedPartners, L.P. for its services rendered to BHBBHLB in connection with the Merger and transactions contemplated by this Agreement is attached toBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.13.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.14  Environmental Matters.

5.14.1  Except as may be set forth inBHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.14, with respect to BHBBHLB and each BHBBHLB Subsidiary:

(A)  To the Knowledge of BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries, each of BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries, and the BHBBHLB Loan Properties (as defined in Section 5.15.2)5.14.2) are, and have been, in material compliance with any Environmental Laws;

(B)  Neither BHBBHLB nor any BHBBHLB Subsidiary has received written notice in the last five (5) years that there is any material suit, claim, action, demand, executive or administrative order, directive, request for information, investigation or proceeding pending and, to the Knowledge of BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries, no such action is threatened, before any court, governmental agency or other forum against them or any BHBBHLB Loan Property (x) for alleged noncompliance (including by any predecessor) with, or liability under, any Environmental Law or (y) relating to the presence of or release into the environment of any Materials of Environmental Concern, whether or not occurring at or on a site owned, leased or operated by BHB,BHLB, or any of the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries;

(C)  To the Knowledge of BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries, the properties currently owned or operated by BHBBHLB or any BHBBHLB Subsidiary (including, without limitation, soil, groundwater or surface water on, or under the properties, and buildings thereon) are not contaminated with and do not otherwise contain any Materials of Environmental Concern other than in amounts permitted under applicable Environmental Law or which are de minimis in nature and extent;

(D)  There are no underground storage tanks on, in or under any properties owned or operated by BHBBHLB or any of the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries or to the Knowledge of BHB and the BHB Subsidiaries, any BHBBHLB Loan Property, and no underground storage tanks have been closed or removed from any properties owned or operated by BHBBHLB or any of the BHB Subsidiaries, to the Knowledge of BHB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries or any BHBBHLB Loan Property except as in compliance with Environmental Laws; and

(E)  During the period of (a) BHB’sBHLB’s or any of the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries’ ownership or operation of any of their respective current properties or (b) BHB’sBHLB’s or any of the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries’ participation in the management of any BHBBHLB Loan Property, to the Knowledge of BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries, there has been no material contamination by or material release of Materials of Environmental Concern in, on, under or affecting such properties. To the Knowledge of BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries, prior to the period of (x) BHB’sBHLB’s or any of the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries’ ownership or operation of any of their respective current properties or (y) BHB’sBHLB’s or any of the BHB


TABLE OF CONTENTS

BHLB Subsidiaries’ participation in the management of any BHBBHLB Loan Property, there was no material contamination by or release of Materials of Environmental Concern in, on, under or affecting such properties.

(F)  Neither BHBBHLB nor any other BHBBHLB Subsidiary has conducted any environmental studies during the past five (5) years (other than Phase I studies or Phase II studies which did not indicate any contamination of the environment by Materials of Environmental Concern above reportable levels) with respect to any properties owned or leased by it or any of its Subsidiaries, or with respect to any BHBBHLB Loan Property.

5.14.2  For purposes of this Section 5.14, “BHBBHLB Loan Property” means any property in which BHBBHLB or an BHBBHLB Subsidiary presently holds a direct or indirect security interest securing to a loan or other extension of credit made by them, including through an BHBBHLB Loan Participation, and “BHBBHLB Loan Participation” means a participation interest in a loan or other extension of credit other than by BHBBHLB or an BHBBHLB Subsidiary.

5.15  BHBBHLB Information Supplied.

The information relating to BHBBHLB and any BHBBHLB Subsidiary to be contained in the Merger Registration Statement, or in any other document filed with any Bank Regulator or other Governmental Entity in connection herewith, will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they are made, not misleading.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.16  Securities Documents.

Since January 1, 2007, BHBBHLB has filed with the SEC all forms, reports, schedules, registration statements, definitive proxy statements and information statements or other filings (“BHBBHLB SEC Reports”) required to be filed by it with the SEC. As of their respective dates, the BHBBHLB SEC Reports complied as to form with the requirements of the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, as applicable, and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder in all material respects. As of their respective dates and as of the date any information from the BHBBHLB SEC Reports has been incorporated by reference, the BHBBHLB SEC Reports did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. BHBBHLB has filed all material contracts, agreements and other documents or instruments required to be filed as exhibits to the BHBBHLB SEC Reports.Reports (the “BHLBMaterial Agreements”).

5.17  Internal Controls.

None of BHB’s or any BHB Subsidiary’s5.17.1  The records, systems, controls, data orand information of BHLB and its Subsidiaries are recorded, stored, maintained and operated or otherwise wholly or partly dependent on or held by anyunder means (including any electronic, mechanical or photographic process, whether computerized or not) whichthat are under the exclusive ownership and direct control of BHLB or its Subsidiaries or accountants (including all means of access thereto and therefrom) are not under their exclusive, except for any non-exclusive ownership and direct control. BHB hasnon-direct control that would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the system of internal accounting controls described in the following sentence. BHLB and its Subsidiaries have devised and maintainsmaintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAPGAAP. BHLB has designed and implemented disclosure controls and procedures (within the meaning of Rules 13a-15(e) and 15D-15(e) of the Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to it and its Subsidiaries is made known to its management by others within those entities as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to make the certifications required by the Exchange Act and Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

5.17.2  BHLB’s management has completed an assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting in compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the year ended December 31, 2009, and such assessment concluded that such controls were effective. It has previously disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to its auditors and the applicable provisionsaudit committee of the Securities ActLegacy Board; (A) any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting and (B) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in its internal controls over financial reporting.

5.17.3  Since December 31, 2007, (A) neither BHLB nor any of its Subsidiaries nor, to its knowledge, any director, officer, employee, auditor, accountant or representative of BHLB or any of its Subsidiaries has received or otherwise had or obtained knowledge of any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim, whether written or oral, regarding the Exchange Act.accounting or auditing practices, procedures, methodologies or methods (including with respect to loan loss reserves, write-downs, charge-offs and accruals) of it or any of its subsidiaries or their respective internal accounting controls, including any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim that it or any of its subsidiaries has engaged in questionable accounting or auditing practices, and (B) no attorney representing BHLB or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by it or any of its Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a material violation of securities laws, breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation by BHLB or any of its officers, directors, employees or agents to its board of directors or any committee thereof or to any of its directors or officers.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.18  BHBBHLB Common Stock.

The shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock to be issued pursuant to this Agreement, when issued in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable and subject to no preemptive rights.

5.19  Available Funds

Immediately prior to the Effective Time, BHBBHLB will have cash sufficient to pay or cause to be deposited into the Exchange Fund as required by Section 3.3.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.20  Berkshire Insurance Group, Inc.

Berkshire Insurance, a Massachusetts insurance agency, and its Affiliates are in compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations applicable to Persons engaged in the insurance agency business. Neither Berkshire Insurance nor any of its Affiliates has been a party, directly or indirectly, to the placement of insurance which is unlawful. To the Knowledge of BHBBHLB and Berkshire Insurance, no binder of insurance has been issued or sent to any Person by or on behalf of Berkshire Insurance unless and until the relevant risk was properly bound and all binders of insurance on the part of Berkshire Insurance are complete and accurate.

5.21  Fairness Opinion.

BHBBHLB has received an opinion, a copy of which will be provided to Rome,Legacy promptly following the date of this Agreement, from Stifel Nicolaus WeiselSandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P., to the effect that, subject to the terms, conditions and qualifications set forth therein, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be received by the shareholders of RomeLegacy pursuant to this Agreement is fair to BHBBHLB and its shareholders from a financial point of view. Such opinion has not been amended or rescinded as of the date of this Agreement.

5.22  Board Approval.

The Board of Directors of BHLB determined that the Merger is fair to, and in the best interests of, BHLB and its stockholders, approved and declared advisable this Agreement, the Merger, the Bank Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby, resolved to recommend adoption of this Agreement to the holders of BHLB Common Stock, and directed that this Agreement be submitted to the holders of BHLB Common Stock for their adoption. The Board of Directors of BHLB has taken all action so that Legacy and Legacy Banks will not be an “interested stockholder” or prohibited from entering into or consummating a “business combination” with BHLB (in each case as such term is used in Section 203 of the DGCL) as a result of the execution of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions in the manner contemplated hereby.

5.23  Material Agreement; Defaults.

5.23.1  Subject to any consents that may be required as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, to its Knowledge neither BHLB nor any BHLB Subsidiary is in material default under any BHLB Material Agreement by which its assets, business, or operations may be bound or affected, or under which it or its assets, business, or operations receive benefits, and there has not occurred any event that, with the lapse of time or the giving of notice or both, would constitute such a default.

5.23.2  Except as set forth inBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.23.2, no BHLB Material Agreement (i) provides for acceleration of the vesting of benefits or payments due thereunder upon the occurrence of a change in ownership or control of BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary or upon the occurrence of a subsequent event; (ii) requires BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary to provide a benefit in the form of BHLB Common Stock or determined by reference to the value of BHLB Common Stock or (iii) contains provisions which permit an employee, director or independent contractor to terminate such agreement or arrangement without cause and continue to accrue future benefits thereunder.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.24  Loan Portfolio.

5.24.1  The allowances for loan losses reflected in the notes to BHLB’s audited consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were, and the allowance for loan losses shown in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for periods ending after December 31, 2009 were, or will be, adequate, as of the dates thereof, under GAAP.

5.24.2  BHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.24.2 sets forth a listing that as of June 30, 2010 are classified as “Other Loans Specially Mentioned,” “Special Mention,” “Substandard,” “Doubtful,” “Loss,” “Classified,” “Criticized,” “Watch list” or words of similar import, together with the principal amount of and accrued and unpaid interest on each such Loan and the identity of the obligor thereunder.

5.24.3  All loans receivable (including discounts) and accrued interest entered on the books of BHLB and Berkshire Bank arose out of bona fide arm’s-length transactions, were made for good and valuable consideration in the ordinary course of BHLB’s and Berkshire Bank’s respective businesses, and the notes or other evidences of indebtedness with respect to such loans (including discounts) are true and genuine and are what they purport to be. The loans, discounts and the accrued interest reflected on the books of BHLB and Berkshire Bank are subject to no defenses, set-offs or counterclaims (including, without limitation, those afforded by usury or truth-in-lending laws), except as may be provided by bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally or by general principles of equity. All such loans are owned by BHLB or Berkshire Bank free and clear of any liens.

5.24.4  The notes and other evidences of indebtedness evidencing the loans described above, and all pledges, mortgages, deeds of trust and other collateral documents or security instruments relating thereto are valid, true and genuine, and what they purport to be.

5.25  Related Party Transactions.

5.25.1  Neither BHLB nor any BHLB Subsidiary is a party to any transaction (including any loan or other credit accommodation) with any Affiliate of BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary, except as set forth inBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.25 or as described in BHLB’s proxy statement dated March 26, 2010 distributed in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders held on May 6, 2010. Except as described in such proxy statement or inBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.25, all such transactions (a) were made in the ordinary course of business, (b) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other Persons, and (c) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. No loan or credit accommodation to any Affiliate of BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary is presently in default or, during the three (3)-year period prior to the date of this Agreement, has been in default or has been restructured, modified or extended. Neither BHLB nor any BHLB Subsidiary has been notified that principal or interest with respect to any such loan or other credit accommodation will not be paid when due or that the loan grade classification accorded such loan or credit accommodation is inappropriate.

5.26  Risk Management Instruments.

All interest rate swaps, caps, floors, option agreements, futures and forward contracts and other similar risk management arrangements, whether entered into for BHLB’s own account, or for the account of one or more of BHLB’s Subsidiaries or their customers, in force and effect as of November 30, 2010 (all of which are set forth inBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.26), were entered into in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and regulatory policies, and to the Knowledge of BHLB and each BHLB Subsidiary, with counterparties believed to be financially responsible at the time; and to BHLB’s and each BHLB Subsidiary’s Knowledge each of them constitutes the valid and legally binding obligation of BHLB or such BHLB Subsidiary, enforceable in accordance with its terms (except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights or by general equity principles), and is in full force and effect. Neither BHLB nor any BHLB Subsidiary, nor any other party thereto, is in breach of any of its obligations under any such agreement or arrangement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.27  Duties as Fiduciary.

Other than as set forth onBHLB Disclosure Schedule 5.27, Berkshire Bank has, if required by virtue of any line of business in which it is or previously was engaged in a “fiduciary capacity,” to its Knowledge has performed all of its duties in a fashion that complied with all applicable laws, regulations, orders, agreements, wills, instruments, and common law standards in effect at that time. Berkshire Bank has not received notice of any claim, allegation, or complaint from any Person that Berkshire Bank failed to perform these duties in a manner that complied with all applicable laws, regulations, orders, agreements, wills, instruments, and common law standards, except for notices involving matters that have been resolved and any cost of such resolution is reflected in the BHLB Financial Statements. For purposes of this Section 5.27, the term “fiduciary capacity” (i) shall mean (a) acting as trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, transfer agent, guardian, assignee, receiver, or custodian under a uniform gifts to minors act and (b) possessing investment discretion on behalf of another, and (ii) shall exclude Berkshire Bank’s capacity with respect to individual retirement accounts or the BHLB Benefit Plans.

5.28  Employees; Labor Matters.

5.28.1  There are no labor or collective bargaining agreements to which BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary is a party. There is no union organizing effort pending or, to the Knowledge of BHLB, threatened against BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary. There is no labor strike, labor dispute (other than routine employee grievances that are not related to union employees), work slowdown, stoppage or lockout pending or, to the Knowledge of BHLB, threatened against BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary. There is no unfair labor practice or labor arbitration proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of BHLB, threatened against BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary (other than routine employee grievances that are not related to union employees). BHLB and each BHLB Subsidiary is in compliance with all applicable laws respecting employment and employment practices, terms and conditions of employment and wages and hours, and are not engaged in any unfair labor practice. Neither BHLB nor any BHLB Subsidiary is a party to, or bound by, any agreement for the leasing of employees.

5.28.2  To BHLB’s Knowledge, all Persons who have been treated as independent contractors by BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary for Tax purposes have met the criteria to be so treated under all applicable federal, state and local Tax laws, rules and regulations.

ARTICLE VI
COVENANTS OF ROMELEGACY

6.1  Conduct of Business.

6.1.1  Affirmative Covenants.During the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, except with the written consent of BHB,BHLB, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, RomeLegacy will, and it will cause each RomeLegacy Subsidiary to: operate its business only in the usual, regular and ordinary course of business; use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business organization and assets and maintain its rights and franchises; and voluntarily take no action which would: (i) materially adversely affect the ability of the parties to obtain the Regulatory Approvals or materially increase the period of time necessary to obtain the Regulatory Approvals, (ii) materially adversely affect its ability to perform its covenants and agreements under this Agreement or (iii) result in the representations and warranties contained in Article IV of this Agreement not being true and correct on the date of this Agreement or at any future date on or prior to the Closing Date or in any of the conditions set forth in Article IX hereof not being satisfied.

6.1.2  Negative Covenants.  RomeLegacy agrees that from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, except as otherwise specifically permitted or required by this Agreement or consented to by BHBBHLB in writing, it will not, and it will cause each of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries not to:

(A)  take any action that would, or is reasonably likely to, prevent or impede the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;

(B)  change or waive any provision of its certificate of incorporation (or articles of association in the case of The Rome Savings Bank)Legacy Banks) or bylaws, except as required by law;


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(C)  change the number of authorized or issued shares of its capital stock, issue any shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock that are held as Treasury Stock as of the date of this Agreement, or issue or grant any Right or agreement of any character relating to its authorized or issued capital stock or any securities convertible into shares of such stock, make any grant or award under the RomeLegacy Stock Option PlansPlan or the RomeLegacy Restricted Stock Plans,Plan, or split, combine or reclassify any shares of capital stock, or declare, set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution in respect of capital stock, or redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock, except that RomeLegacy (i) may issue shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock upon the valid exercise, in accordance with the information set forth inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.3.1, of presently outstanding RomeLegacy Stock Options issued under the RomeLegacy Stock Option Plans,Plan, (ii) may permit the vesting of awards previously made under the RomeLegacy Restricted Stock Plans, (iii) shall continue to declare and pay regular quarterly cash dividends of no more than $0.09$0.05 per share with payment and record dates consistent with past practice (provided that the declaration of the last quarterly dividend by RomeLegacy prior to the Effective Time and the payment thereof shall be coordinated with BHBBHLB so that holders of RomeLegacy Common Stock do not


TABLE OF CONTENTS

receive dividends on both RomeLegacy Common Stock and BHBBHLB Common Stock received in the Merger in respect of such quarter or fail to receive a dividend on at least one of the RomeLegacy Common Stock or BHBBHLB Common Stock received in the Merger in respect of such quarter) and (iv) any RomeLegacy Subsidiary may pay dividends to its parent company (as permitted under applicable law or regulations).

(D)  enter into, amend in any material respect or terminate any material contract or agreement (including without limitation any settlement agreement with respect to litigation) in excess of $10,000$100,000, except as contemplated by this Agreement;

(E)  make application for the opening or closing of any, or open or close any, branch or automated banking facility;

(F)  grant or agree to pay any bonus (discretionary or otherwise), severance or termination to, or enter into, renew or amend any employment agreement, severance agreement and/or supplemental executive agreement with, or increase in any manner the compensation or fringe benefits of, any of its directors, officers, employees or consultants, except (i) as may be required pursuant to commitments existing on the date hereof and set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedules 4.9.1 and 4.13.1 or as required pursuant to Section 7.6 of this Agreement, (ii) for salary adjustments in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice provided that any increases to such amounts shall not exceed four percent (4%) in the aggregate or (iii) as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement. Neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary shall hire or promote any employee to a rank having a title of vice president or other more senior rank or hire any new employee at an annual rate of compensation in excess of $50,000;$75,000; provided, however, that a RomeLegacy Subsidiary may hire at-will, non-officer employees at an annual compensation rate not to exceed $50,000$75,000 to fill vacancies that may from time to time arise in the ordinary course of business; provided, further, that that neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary shall hire any new employee without first seeking to fill any position internally. Neither RomeLegacy nor or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary shall pay expenses of any employee or director for attending conventions held after the date hereof;

(G)  except as set forth onLegacy Disclosure Schedule 6.1.2(G), enter into or, except as may be required by law or any such plan or agreement or by the terms of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated herein, modify any pension, retirement, stock option, stock purchase, stock appreciation right, stock grant, savings, profit sharing, deferred compensation, supplemental retirement, consulting, bonus, group insurance or other employee benefit, incentive or welfare contract, plan or arrangement, or any trust agreement related thereto, in respect of any of its directors, officers or employees, or make any contributions to any defined contribution or defined benefit plan not in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

(H)  merge or consolidate RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary with any other Person; sell or lease all or any substantial portion of the assets or business of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary; make any acquisition of all or any substantial portion of the business or assets of any other Person


TABLE OF CONTENTS

other than in connection with foreclosures, settlements in lieu of foreclosure, troubled loan or debt restructuring, or the collection of any loan or credit arrangement between RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks and any other Person; enter into a purchase and assumption transaction with respect to deposits and liabilities; incur deposit liabilities, other than liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and in keeping with prevailing competitive rates; permit the revocation or surrender by The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks of its certificate of authority to maintain, or file an application for the relocation of, any existing branch office, or file an application for a certificate of authority to establish a new branch office;

(I)  sell or otherwise dispose of the capital stock of Rome orexcept as set forth onLegacy Disclosure Schedule 6.1.2(I), sell or otherwise dispose of any asset of RomeLegacy or of any RomeLegacy Subsidiary other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; except for transactions with the FHLB, subject any asset of RomeLegacy or of any RomeLegacy Subsidiary to a lien, pledge, security interest or other encumbrance (other than in connection with deposits, repurchase agreements, bankers acceptances, pledges in connection with acceptance of governmental deposits, and transactions in “federal funds” and the satisfaction of legal requirements


TABLE OF CONTENTS

in the exercise of trust powers) other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; incur any indebtedness for borrowed money (or guarantee any indebtedness for borrowed money), except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

(J)  change its method, practice or principle of accounting, except as may be required from time to time by GAAP (without regard to any optional early adoption date) or regulatory accounting principles or by any Bank Regulator responsible for regulating RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings Bank;Legacy Banks;

(K)  waive, release, grant or transfer any rights of value or modify or change any existing agreement or indebtedness to which RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary is a party;

(L)  purchase any securities except securities (i) rated “A” or higher by either Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or Moody’s Investors Service, (ii) having a face amount in the aggregate of not more than $250,000,$1,100,000, (iii) with a duration of not more than three (3)five (5) years and (iv) otherwise in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

(M)  except as specifically provided below, and except for commitments issued prior to the date of this Agreement which have not yet expired and which have been disclosed onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 6.1.2(M) (which schedule need not include any individual commitment which is less than $50,000$100,000 in amount provided that such schedule includes the aggregate amount of individual commitments which are less than $50,000$100,000 that have been excluded from the schedule), and except for the renewal of existing lines of credit, (i) make or acquire any new loan or other credit facility commitment (including without limitation, loan participations, lines of credit and letters of credit) other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or (ii) make or acquire any new loan or issue any commitment for any new loan with a principal amount of $500,000$1,000,000 or more without the prior consent of BHB;BHLB; provided that such consent shall be deemed to have been granted if BHBBHLB does not object within three (3) business daysBusiness Days of receipt of written notice from RomeLegacy of its intent to make such loan;

(N)  enter into, renew, extend or modify any other transaction (other than a deposit transaction) with any Affiliate;

(O)  enter into any futures contracts, options, interest rate caps, interest rate floors, interest rate exchange agreements or other agreements or take any other action for purposes of hedging the exposure of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to changes in market rates of interest;

(P)  except for the execution of this Agreement, and actions taken or which will be taken in accordance with this Agreement and performance hereunder, take any action that would give rise to a right of payment to any individual under any employment agreement;


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(Q)  make any change in policies in existence on the date of this Agreement with regard to: the extension of credit, or the establishment of reserves with respect to the possible loss thereon or the charge off of losses incurred thereon; investments; asset/liability management; or other banking policies except as may be required by changes in applicable law or regulations, GAAP or regulatory accounting principles or by a Bank Regulator;

(R)  except for the execution of this Agreement, and the transactions contemplated herein and any terminations of employment, take any action that would give rise to an acceleration of the right to payment to any individual under any RomeLegacy Benefit Plan;

(S)  make any capital expenditures in excess of $25,000 individually or $50,000 in the aggregate, other than pursuant to binding commitments existing on the date hereof which are set forth onRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 6.1.2(S) which includes the budget for each such pre-existing commitment.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(T)  except as set forth onLegacy Disclosure Schedule 6.1.2(T), purchase or otherwise acquire, or sell or otherwise dispose of, any assets or incur any liabilities other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices and policies;

(U)  except for existing commitments to sell any participation interest in any loan, sell any participation interest in any loan (other than sales of loans secured by one- to four-family real estate that are consistent with past practice) unless BHBBHLB has been given the first opportunity and a reasonable time to purchase any loan participation being sold, or purchase any participation interest in any loan other than purchases of participation interests from BHB;BHLB;

(V)  undertake or enter into any lease, contract or other commitment for its account, other than in the ordinary course of providing credit to customers as part of its banking business, involving a payment by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary of more than $25,000 annually, or containing any financial commitment extending beyond twelve (12) months from the date hereof;

(W)  pay, discharge, settle or compromise any claim, action, litigation, arbitration or proceeding, other than any such payment, discharge, settlement or compromise in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice that involves solely money damages in the amount not in excess of $25,000 individually or $50,000 in the aggregate, and that does not create negative precedent for other pending or potential claims, actions, litigation, arbitration or proceedings;

(X)  foreclose upon or take a deed or title to any commercial real estate without (i) providing notice to BHB prior to final sale, (ii) conductinghaving a Phase I environmental assessment of the property conducted as of a reasonably current date and, (iii) foreclosing upon any commercial real estate ifin the event such Phase I environmental assessment of the property indicates the presence of Materials of Environmental Concern;Concern, providing notice to BHLB thereof prior to final sale;

(Y)  purchase or sell any mortgage loan servicing rights other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

(Z)  issue any broadly distributed communication of a general nature to employees (including general communications relating to benefits and compensation) without prior consultation with BHBBHLB and, to the extent relating to post-Closing employment, benefit or compensation information without the prior consent of BHBBHLB (which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) or issue any broadly distributed communication of a general nature to customers without the prior approval of BHBBHLB (which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), except as required by law or for communications in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice that do not relate to the Merger or other transactions contemplated hereby;

(AA)  make, change or rescind any material election concerning Taxes or Tax Returns, file any amended Tax Return, enter into any closing agreement with respect to Taxes, settle or compromise any material Tax claim or assessment or surrender any right to claim a refund of Taxes or obtain any Tax ruling; or


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(BB)  enter into any contract with respect to, or otherwise agree or commit to do, any of the foregoing.

6.2  Subsidiaries.

RomeLegacy shall cause the proper and lawful dissolution and winding up prior to the Effective Time of Clocktower and, if requested by BHB, any of its other Subsidiaries that are inactive as of the date of this Agreement.

6.3  Current Information.

6.3.1  During the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, RomeLegacy will cause one or more of its representatives to confer with representatives of BHBBHLB to inform BHBBHLB regarding Rome’sLegacy’s operations at such times as BHBBHLB may reasonably request. RomeLegacy will promptly notify BHBBHLB of any change in the ordinary course of its business or in the operation of its properties and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, of any governmental complaints, investigations or hearings (or communications indicating that the same may be contemplated), or the institution or the threat of material litigation involving RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary. Without limiting the foregoing, senior officers of


TABLE OF CONTENTS

BHB BHLB and RomeLegacy shall meet monthly to review, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the financial and operational affairs of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, and RomeLegacy shall give due consideration to BHB’sBHLB’s input on such matters, with the understanding that, notwithstanding any other provision contained in this Agreement, neither BHBBHLB nor Berkshire Bank shall under any circumstance be permitted to exercise control of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary prior to the Effective Time.

6.3.2  RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB shall cooperate regarding a plan for the conversion of data processing and related electronic informational systems of RomeLegacy to those used by BHB,BHLB, which planning shall include, but not be limited to, discussion of the possible termination by RomeLegacy of third-party service provider arrangements effective at the Effective Time or at a date thereafter, non-renewal of personal property leases and software licenses used by RomeLegacy in connection with its systems operations, retention of outside consultants and additional employees to assist with the conversion, and outsourcing, as appropriate, of proprietary or self-provided system services, it being understood that RomeLegacy shall not be obligated to take any such action prior to the Effective Time and, unless RomeLegacy otherwise agrees and provided it is permitted by applicable law, no conversion shall take place prior to the Effective Time. In the eventBHLB and Berkshire Bank shall indemnify Legacy for any reasonable out-of-pocket fees, expenses, or charges that The Rome Savings Bank takes,Legacy or any Legacy Subsidiary may incur as a result of taking, at the request of Berkshire Bank,BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary, any action relative to third parties to facilitate the conversion that results in the imposition of any termination fees or charges and the Merger is not consummated for any reason other than a breach of this Agreement by Rome, or a termination of this Agreement under Sections 11.1.7 or 11.1.8, Berkshire Bank shall indemnify The Rome Savings Bank for any such fees and charges, and the cost of reversing the conversion process in an amount not to exceed $750,000.conversion.

6.3.3  RomeLegacy shall provide BHB,BHLB, within ten (10) business daysfifteen (15) Business Days of the end of each calendar month, a written list of nonperforming assets (the term “nonperforming assets,” for purposes of this subsection, means (i) loans that are “troubled debt restructuring” as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15, “Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructuring,” (ii) loans on nonaccrual, (iii) real estate owned, (iv) all loans ninety (90) days or more past due as of the end of such month and (v) and impaired loans. On a monthly basis, RomeLegacy shall provide BHBBHLB with a schedule of all (x) loan grading changes and (y) loan approvals, which schedule shall indicate the loan amount, loan type and other material features of the loan. RomeLegacy will promptly prepare and provide BHBBHLB with the minutes of all RomeLegacy and The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks officer and director loan committee meetings.

6.3.4  RomeLegacy shall promptly inform BHBBHLB, to the extent permitted by applicable law, upon receiving notice of any legal, administrative, arbitration or other proceedings, demands, notices, audits or investigations (by any federal, state or local commission, agency or board) relating to the alleged liability of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary under any labor or employment law.

6.4  Access to Properties and Records.

Subject to Section 12.1, RomeLegacy shall permit BHBBHLB access upon reasonable notice and at reasonable times to its properties and those of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, and shall disclose and make available to BHBBHLB during normal business hours all of its books and records relating to the assets, properties, operations, obligations and liabilities, including, but not limited to, all books of account (including the general ledger), tax records, minute books of directors’ and shareholders’ meetings (other than minutes that discuss any of the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any other subject matter that RomeLegacy reasonably determines should be kept confidential), organizational documents, bylaws, material contracts and agreements, filings with any regulatory authority, litigation files, plans affecting employees, and any other business activities or prospects in which BHBBHLB may have a reasonable interest; provided, however, that RomeLegacy shall not be required to take any action that would provide access to or to disclose information where such access or disclosure, in Rome’sLegacy’s reasonable judgment, would interfere with the normal conduct of Rome’sLegacy’s business or would violate or prejudice the rights or business interests or confidences of any customer or other Person or entity or would result in the waiver by it of the privilege protecting communications between it and any of its counsel or contravene any applicable law. RomeLegacy shall provide and shall request its auditors to provide BHBBHLB with such historical financial information regarding it (and related audit reports and consents) as BHBBHLB may reasonably request for Securities Law disclosure purposes. BHBBHLB shall use commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any interference with Rome’sLegacy’s regular business operations during any such access to Rome’sLegacy’s property, books and records. RomeLegacy and


TABLE OF CONTENTS

each RomeLegacy Subsidiary shall permit BHB,BHLB, at itsBHLB’s expense, to (i) cause a Phase I environmental assessment and a Phase II environmental assessment to be performed at any physical location owned or occupied by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary and (ii) cause an appraisal to be performed in respect of any real property owned by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary.

6.5  Financial and Other Statements.

6.5.1  Promptly upon receipt thereof, RomeLegacy will furnish to BHBBHLB copies of each annual, interim or special audit of the books of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries made by its independent registered public accountants and copies of all internal control reports submitted to RomeLegacy by such accountants, or by any other accounting firm rendering internal audit services, in connection with each annual, interim or special audit of the books of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries made by such accountants.

6.5.2  As soon as reasonably available, but in no event later than the date such documents are filed with the MDOB, OTS or FDIC, RomeLegacy will deliver to BHBBHLB the RomeLegacy Regulatory Report filed by RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings Bank.Legacy Banks. Within fifteen (15)twenty-five (25) days after the end of each month, The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks will deliver to BHBBHLB a consolidating balance sheet and a consolidating statement of operations, without related notes, for such month prepared in accordance with current financial reporting practices, as well as a month-end and year to date comparison to budget.

6.5.3  RomeLegacy shall permit BHBBHLB to review substantially final drafts of its quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, respectively, at least two (2) business daysBusiness Days prior to the date such documents are filed with the SEC. As soon as reasonably available, but in no event later than the date such documents are filed with the SEC, Rome will deliver to BHB the Securities Documents filed by it with the SEC under the Securities Laws. RomeLegacy promptly will advise upon receipt and permit review by BHBBHLB of any inquiry or examination report of any Bank Regulator with respect to the condition or activities of RomeLegacy or The Rome Savings Bank, as applicable.Legacy Banks.

6.5.4  With reasonable promptness, RomeLegacy will furnish to BHBBHLB such additional financial data that RomeLegacy possesses and as BHBBHLB may reasonably request, including without limitation, detailed monthly financial statements and loan reports and detailed deposit reports.

6.6  Maintenance of Insurance.

RomeLegacy shall use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain, and to cause the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries to maintain, insurance in such amounts as are reasonable to cover such risks as are customary in relation to the character and location of its properties and the nature of its business, with such coverage and in such amounts not less than that currently maintained by RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries as of the date of this Agreement and set forth inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.10.3. RomeLegacy will promptly inform BHBBHLB if RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary receives notice from an insurance carrier that (i) an insurance policy will be canceled or that coverage thereunder will be reduced or eliminated, or (ii) premium costs with respect to any policy of insurance will be substantially increased.

6.7  Disclosure Supplements.

From time to time prior to the Effective Time, RomeLegacy will promptly supplement or amend the RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule delivered in connection herewith with respect to any matter hereafter arising which, if existing, occurring or known at the date of this Agreement, would have been required to be set forth or


TABLE OF CONTENTS

described in such RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule or which is necessary to correct any information in such RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule which has been rendered materially inaccurate thereby. No supplement or amendment to such RomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule shall have any effect for the purpose of determining satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Article IX.

6.8  Consents and Approvals of Third Parties.

RomeLegacy shall use its commercially reasonable efforts, and shall cause each RomeLegacy Subsidiary to use its commercially reasonable efforts, to obtain as soon as practicable all consents and approvals of any other Persons or entities necessary for the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

6.9  All Reasonable Efforts.

Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided, RomeLegacy agrees to use, and agrees to cause each RomeLegacy Subsidiary to use, all commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all action and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary under applicable laws and regulations to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

6.10  Failure to Fulfill Conditions.

In the event that RomeLegacy determines that a condition to its obligation to complete the Merger cannot be fulfilled and that it will not waive that condition, it will promptly notify BHB.BHLB.

6.11  No Solicitation.

From6.11.1  Except as to the Non-Restricted Period as set forth in Section 6.11.2, from and after the date hereof until the termination of this Agreement, neither Rome,Legacy, nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary, nor any of their respective officers, directors, employees, representatives, agents and affiliates (including, without limitation, any investment banker, attorney or accountant retained by RomeLegacy or any of the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries), will, directly or indirectly, initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing non-public information or assistance) any inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal (as defined below)by Section 6.11.4), or enter into or maintain or continue discussions or negotiate with any Person in furtherance of such inquiries or to obtain an Acquisition Proposal or agree to or endorse any Acquisition Proposal, or authorize or permit any of its officers, directors, or employees or any of its Subsidiaries or any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney, accountant or other representative retained by any of its Subsidiaries to take any such action, and RomeLegacy shall notify BHBBHLB orally and in writing (as promptly as practicable)practicable but no later than one business day of receipt of such inquiry or proposal) of all of the relevant details relating to all inquiries and proposals which RomeLegacy or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective officers, directors or employees, or, to Rome’sLegacy’s Knowledge, investment bankers, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants or other representatives of RomeLegacy may receive relating to any of such matters;provided,however, that nothing contained in this Section 6.11 shall prohibit the Board of Directors of RomeLegacy from (i) complying with its disclosure obligations under federal or state law; or (ii) prior to the time that the Rome shareholders meeting has occurred,Legacy Shareholder Vote, furnishing information to, or entering into discussions or negotiations with, any Person or entity that makes an unsolicited Acquisition Proposal, if, and only to the extent that (A) such Acquisition Proposal did not result from a breach of this Section 6.11 by Legacy, (B) the Board of Directors of Rome determinesLegacy or any appropriate committee thereof has determined in its good faith (afterjudgment, after consultation with Legacy’s financial advisor and outside counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal is reasonably likely to be consummated in accordance with its financial and legal advisors),terms, taking into account all legal, financial (including the financing terms thereof) and regulatory aspects (including any divesture of deposit liabilities by BHLB or Legacy in order to comply with a requirement contained in any Regulatory Approval, or a condition necessary to obtain any Regulatory Approval) of the proposal and the Person making the proposal, thatand (C) such proposal, if consummated,Acquisition Proposal is reasonably likely to result in a transaction more favorable to Rome’sLegacy shareholders from a financial point of view than the Merger;Merger (taking into account all relevant factors, including, without limitation, the timing

of consummation as compared to the Merger and (B) such Acquisition Proposal was not solicitedafter giving effect to all of the adjustments, if any, which may be offered by Rome and did not otherwise result from a breach of thisBHLB pursuant to Section 6.11 by Rome11.1.8) (such proposal that satisfies clauses (A), (B) and (B)(C) being referred to herein as a “Superior Proposal”);provided,however, that a Superior Proposal


TABLE OF CONTENTS

may consist of multiple Acquisition Proposals that, taken together, satisfy all of the requirements set forth in this definition;provided,further, that the Board of Directors of Legacy or any appropriate committee thereof may determine in its good faith judgment, after consultation with Legacy’s financial advisor and outside counsel, that an Acquisition Proposal made during the Restricted Period, which the Board of Directors of Legacy determines in good faith is financially equivalent to Legacy shareholders from a financial point of view to the Merger, is nonetheless a Superior Proposal for purposes of this Agreement because such Acquisition Proposal would reasonably be expected to involve materially less risk than any Regulatory Approval or any condition necessary to obtain any Regulatory Approval would require a material divestiture of deposit liabilities;provided,further, nothing contained in this Agreement shall prohibit RomeLegacy and, if applicable, any of its Representatives from (i) informing any Person of the existence of the provisions of this Section 6.11, (ii) contacting any Person solely to clarify the terms and conditions of an Acquisition Proposal, (iii) issuing a “stop-look-and-listen communication” pursuant to Rule 14d-9(f) or taking and disclosing to its shareholders a position as required by Rule 14d-9 or Rule 14e-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act or (ii)(iv) otherwise disclosing any information

to its shareholders that the RomeLegacy Board of Directors determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that it is required to disclose in order to not breach its fiduciary duties to Rome’sLegacy’s shareholders under applicable law, subject to compliance with the requirements of this Section 6.11 and Section 6.13. RomeLegacy shall promptly, but in no event later than two (2)one (1) calendar days,day, notify BHBBHLB of such inquiries, proposals or offers received by, any such information requested from, or any such discussions or negotiations sought to be initiated or continued with RomeLegacy or any of its representatives indicating, in connection with such notice, the name of such Person and the material terms and conditions of any inquiries, proposals or offers, and receives from such Person an executed confidentiality agreement in form and substance identical in all material respects to the Confidentiality Agreements. For purposes

6.11.2  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, during the period beginning on the date of this Agreement and continuing until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time) on January 31, 2011 (the “Non-Restricted Period”), Legacy and the Legacy Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other advisors or representatives (collectively, “Representatives”) shall have the right to: (i) initiate, solicit and encourage any inquiry or the making of any proposal or offer that could constitute an Acquisition Proposal, including by way of providing access to non-public information which was not provided by or derived from any non-public information provided by BHLB or in any way related to or reflecting any negotiations with BHLB regarding the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to any Person pursuant to (but only pursuant to) a confidentiality agreement on customary terms not materially more favorable to such Person than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreements (an “Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement”), except that Legacy may enter into a confidentiality agreement without a standstill provision or with a standstill provision less favorable to Legacy if and only if it first waives or similarly modifies the standstill provision in the Confidentiality Agreements. Legacy shall promptly make available to BHLB any material non-public information concerning Legacy or any Legacy Subsidiary that Legacy provides to any Person given such access that was not previously made available to BHLB, and may engage or enter into, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions or negotiations with any Persons or groups of Persons with respect to any Acquisition Proposal or otherwise cooperate with or assist or participate in, or facilitate any inquiry, proposal, discussion or negotiation or any effort or attempt to make any Acquisition Proposal, including through the waiver or release by Legacy, at its sole discretion, of any preexisting standstill or similar agreements with any Person solely to the extent necessary to permit such Person to make or amend an Acquisition Proposal or otherwise engage with Legacy in discussions regarding an Acquisition Proposal or a proposal that could reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal.

6.11.3  Except as expressly permitted by Section 6.11.1, Legacy and its respective officers and directors shall, and Legacy shall use its reasonable best efforts to instruct and cause all other Representatives of Legacy or any Legacy Subsidiary, (i) to, at 12:00 a.m. on the February 1, 2011 (the “Restricted Period Start Date”), immediately cease any discussions or negotiations with any Persons that may be ongoing with respect to an Acquisition Proposal and, (ii) after the Restricted Period Start Date, not to: (A) initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage any inquiry or the making of any proposal or


TABLE OF CONTENTS

offer that constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal, (B) engage in, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or provide any non-public information or data concerning Legacy or any Legacy Subsidiary to any Person relating to, or that could reasonably be expected to lead to any Acquisition Proposal, (C) otherwise knowingly facilitate any effort or attempt to make an Acquisition Proposal.

6.11.4  “Acquisition Proposal” shall mean any proposal or offer as to any of the following (other than the transactions contemplated hereunder) involving RomeLegacy or any of its Subsidiaries: (i) any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, or other similar transactions; (ii) any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition of 25% or more of the assets of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in a single transaction or series of transactions; (iii) any tender offer or exchange offer for 25% or more of the outstanding shares of capital stock of RomeLegacy or the filing of a registration statement under the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Securities Act in connection therewith; or (iv) any public announcement of a proposal, plan or intention to do any of the foregoing or any agreement to engage in any of the foregoing.

6.12  Reserves and Merger-Related Costs.

Prior to the Effective Time, each of RomeLegacy and its Subsidiaries shall, consistent with GAAP, the rules and regulations of the SEC and applicable U.S. banking laws and regulations, modify or change its loan, OREO, accrual, reserve, tax, litigation and real estate valuation policies and practices (including loan classifications and levels of reserves) so as to be applied on a basis that is consistent with that of BHB,BHLB, provided, however, that no such modifications or changes need be made prior to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Sections 9.1.1 and 9.1.3; provided further, that in any event, no accrual or reserve made by RomeLegacy or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to this Section 6.12 shall constitute or be deemed to be a breach, violation of or failure to satisfy any representation, warranty, covenant, agreement, condition or other provision of this Agreement or otherwise be considered in determining whether any such breach, violation or failure to satisfy shall have occurred. The recording of any such adjustments shall not be deemed to imply any misstatement of previously furnished financial statements or information and shall not be construed as concurrence of RomeLegacy or its management with any such adjustments.

6.13  Board of Directors and Committee Meetings.

RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries shall permit one (1) representativetwo (2) representatives of BHBBHLB to attend any meeting of their Board of Directors, or the committees thereof, and shall permit two (2) representatives of BHB to attend any meeting of their loan (or credit) committee and asset liability committee as an observer (theobservers (together, theObserverBHLB Observers”), provided that neither RomeLegacy nor any RomeLegacy Subsidiary shall be required to permit the ObserverBHLB Observers to remain present during any confidential discussion of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby or any Acquisition Proposal or during any other matter that the respective Board of Directors has been advised of by counsel that such attendance by the ObserverBHLB Observers may violate or be inconsistent with a confidentiality obligation or fiduciary duty or any legal, regulatory or NASDAQ requirement.

6.14  Stock Repurchase Plan; ESOP LoanLoan.

If such plan has not been suspended byAs soon as practicable after the date hereof, the Board of Directors of Rome, or an appropriate committee thereof, shall promptly suspend the effectiveness of Rome’s share repurchase plan (such suspension to be effective immediately upon the execution and delivery of this Agreement, by Rome);but in no event later than five (5) Business Days prior to the Effective Time, Legacy shall cause the Legacy ESOP trustee to repay in full the outstanding indebtedness of the Legacy ESOP, subject to the terms of the Legacy ESOP, by delivering a sufficient number of unallocated shares of Legacy Common Stock to Legacy, subject to and in accordance with applicable law. No later than the occurrence of the Effective Time, the Rome ESOP shall be terminated as provided in the Rome ESOP (allall remaining shares of RomeLegacy Common Stock held by the RomeLegacy ESOP shall be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration as elected by the participants in the Rome ESOP), all accountsConsideration. The Legacy ESOP account balances shall be fully vested, all outstanding indebtedness of the Rome ESOP shall be repaid and the balance of the shares and any other assets remaining in the Rome ESOP not allocated to a participant’s account shall be allocated as provided in the Rome ESOP and distributed to RomeLegacy ESOP participants after the receipt of a favorable determination letter from the IRS. Prior to the Effective Time, Rome shall take all such actions as are necessary (determined in consultation with BHB) in order to submit the application for favorable determination letter in advance of the Effective Time,Legacy and, following the Effective Time, BHB shall use its best efforts in good faith to obtain such favorable determination letter as promptly as possible (including, but not limited to, making such changes to the Rome ESOP and the proposed allocations as may be required by the IRS as a condition to its issuance of a favorable determination letter). Rome and following the Effective Time, BHB,BHLB, will adopt such amendments to the RomeLegacy ESOP to effect the provisions of this Section 6.14.

6.15  The Rome Savings BankLegacy Banks Foundation

RomeLegacy agrees to recommend the merger of The Rome Savings Bank Foundation (the “Foundation”) with and into the Berkshire Bank Foundation, Inc. to the Board of Directors of the Legacy Banks Foundation (“Legacy Foundation”) that the majority of the current Board of Directors of the Legacy Foundation resign as of the


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Closing and that a majority of the Legacy Foundation Board consist of BHLB representatives (“BHLB Foundation Representatives”) as of Closing. Such BHLB Foundation Representatives shall be selected by J. Williar Dunlaevy and agreed to by BHLB. In addition Legacy agrees to recommend to the Legacy Foundation that J. Williar Dunlaevy be appointed the chairman of the Legacy Foundation and that Patrick Sullivan be appointed an officer of the Legacy Foundation.

6.16  401(k) Plan.Plan Termination.

If requested by BHBBHLB in writing prior to the Effective Time, Romeand subject to the occurrence of the Effective Time, Legacy shall cause to be adopted prior to the Closing Date resolutions of the Board of Directors of RomeLegacy and any necessary amendments to cease all contributions to any and all 401(k) plans maintained or sponsored by RomeLegacy or any of its Subsidiaries (collectively, the “401(k) Plans”), and to freezeprohibit the entry of new participants to the 401(k) Plans onas of the day preceding the Closing Date. In


TABLE OF CONTENTS

the sole discretion of BHB,BHLB, the 401(k) Plans may be merged into the BHBBHLB 401(k) Plan. The form and substance of such resolutions and any necessary amendments shall be subject to the review and approval of BHB,BHLB, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. RomeLegacy shall deliver to BHBBHLB an executed copy of such resolutions and any necessary amendments as soon as practicable following their adoption by the Board of Directors of RomeLegacy and shall fully comply with such resolutions and any necessary amendments. If, in accordance with this Section 6.16, BHBBHLB requests in writing that RomeLegacy freeze entry of new participants into the 401(k) Plans, RomeLegacy shall take such actions as BHBBHLB may reasonably require in furtherance of the assumption of the 401(k) Plans by BHB,BHLB, including, but not limited to, adopting such amendments to the 401(k) Plans as BHB may deembe necessary in connection withto effect such assumption.

ARTICLE VII
COVENANTS OF BHB

BHLB

7.1  Negative Covenants.  Conduct of Business.

7.1.1  Affirmative Covenants.

(A)  During the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, except with the written consent of Rome,Legacy, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, BHBBHLB will, not, and it will cause each BHBBHLB Subsidiary not to,to: operate its business other thanonly in the usual, regular and ordinary course of business and willbusiness; use commercially reasonable best efforts to preserve intact its business organization and assets and maintain its rights and franchises; and voluntarily take no action which would:

(A)would (i) change or waive any provision of its certificate of incorporation (or articles ofor organization in the case of Berkshire Bank) or bylaws in any way adverse to the rights of the Legacy shareholders, except as required by law, orexcept as necessary to enter into or consummate a transaction that is permitted pursuant to the final paragraph of this Section 7.1;

(B)set forth onBHLB Disclosure Schedule 7.1.1(A)(i); (ii) materially adversely affect the ability of the parties to obtain the Regulatory Approvals or materially increase the period of time necessary to obtain such approvals;

(C) (iii) materially adversely affect its ability to perform its covenants and agreements under this Agreement;

(D) (iv) result in the representations and warranties contained in Article V of this Agreement not being true and correct on the date of this Agreement or at any future date on or prior to the Closing Date or in any of the conditions set forth in Article IX hereof not being satisfied; or

(E)(v) prevent or impede, or be reasonably likely to prevent or impede, the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

Notwithstanding anything in this Section 7.1 to(B)  Promptly after the contrary, during the period from the date of this AgreementClosing and prior to the Effective Time, BHB may make dispositions and acquisitions and agreeBHLB shall deposit, or shall cause to issue capital stock in connection therewith, provided that such actions would not reasonably be expected to present a material risk thatdeposited, with the Closing Date will be delayed or thatExchange Agent the Regulatory Approvals will be delayed or be materially more difficult to obtain or would, or be reasonably likely to, prevent or impede the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.Exchange Fund.

7.2  Disclosure Supplements.

From time to time prior to the Effective Time, BHBBHLB will promptly supplement or amend the BHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule delivered in connection herewith with respect to any matter hereafter arising which, if existing, occurring or known at the date of this Agreement, would have been required to be set forth or described in such BHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule or which is necessary to correct any information in such BHB BHLB


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Disclosure Schedule which has been rendered materially inaccurate thereby. No supplement or amendment to such BHBBHLB Disclosure Schedule shall have any effect for the purpose of determining satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Article IX.

7.3  Consents and Approvals of Third Parties.

BHBBHLB shall use its commercially reasonable efforts, and shall cause each BHBBHLB Subsidiary to use its commercially reasonable efforts, to obtain as soon as practicable all consents and approvals of any other Persons necessary for the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

7.4  All Reasonable Best Efforts.

Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided, BHBBHLB agrees to use and agrees to cause each BHBBHLB Subsidiary to use all commercially reasonable best efforts in good faith to take, or cause to be taken, all action and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary under applicable laws and regulations to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.Agreement as promptly as practicable.

7.5  Failure to Fulfill Conditions.

In the event that BHBBHLB determines that a condition to its obligation to complete the Merger cannot be fulfilled and that it will not waive that condition, it will promptly notify Rome.Legacy.

7.6  Employee Benefits.

7.6.1  Definition.  “Benefit Plan Determination Date” for purposes of this Section shall mean that date selected by BHBBHLB and consented to by Legacy, which consent shall not be withheld unreasonably, with respect to each RomeLegacy Benefit Plan to be maintained, frozen, terminated or replaced with a similar plan or program provided by BHBBHLB or Berkshire Bank (as used in this Section, BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank are collectively referred to as “BHB”“BHLB”) to other employees similarly situated; provided, that, the definition of “Benefit Plan Determination Date” shall be consistent with the premise that the compensation, employee benefits and terms and conditions of employment that are provided by BHBBHLB after the Closing Date to Current RomeLegacy Employees shall be no less favorable than those provided by BHBBHLB to similarly situated employees of BHB.BHLB.

7.6.2  General Rule: Parity in Benefits; No Gaps; Credit for Service with RomeLegacy.  Within a reasonable period after the Closing Date, but not before the applicable Benefit Plan Determination Date, BHBBHLB shall provide or(or shall cause to be provided by a Subsidiary of BHB,BHLB) to all individuals who are employees of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary at the Closing Date and whose employment continueswho remain so employed immediately following the Effective Time and who are then eligible for a respective Rome Benefit Plan (the “Current RomeLegacy Employees”), compensation, employee benefits and terms and conditions of employment that are substantially similar to those provided by BHBBHLB to similarly situated employees of BHB.BHLB. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing to the contrary, none of the provisions contained herein shall (i) operate to duplicate any benefit provided to any Current RomeLegacy Employees or the funding of any such benefit, (ii) be construed to limit the ability of BHBBHLB to review employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements from time to time, to make such changes as BHBBHLB deems appropriate in its sole and absolute discretion or to terminate such employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements (iii) limit BHB’s abilityprovided that no such action not otherwise required by this Agreement shall discriminate against Current Legacy Employees relative to terminate, in the sole discretionsimilarly situated employees of BHB, Rome’s defined benefit retirement plan, or (iv)BHLB, (iii) create third party rights against BHB. BHBBHLB. BHLB will use best efforts to cause its insurance providers to waive all pre-existing condition limitations and proof of insurability provisions (to the extent such limitations and provisions did not apply to a pre-existing condition under Rome’sLegacy’s equivalent plan) and eligibility waiting periods under such plans that would otherwise be applicable to newly-hired employees for all Current RomeLegacy Employees; provided that nothing in this sentence shall limit the ability of BHBBHLB to amend or enter into new or different employee benefit plans or arrangements provided such plans or arrangements treat the Current RomeLegacy Employees in a substantially similar manner as employees of BHBBHLB are treated. BHBBHLB will use best efforts to cause its insurance providers to honor under such plans any deductible, co-payment and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Current RomeLegacy Employees and their covered dependents during the portion of the plan year prior to the relevant Benefit Plan Determination Date.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under all BHBBHLB Benefit Plans, service with RomeLegacy or a RomeLegacy Subsidiary shall be deemed to be service with BHBBHLB for eligibility and vesting purposes only, but not for purposes of benefit accrual.

7.6.3  BHBBHLB 401(k) Plan Participation.  Each Current RomeLegacy Employee who continues in the employment of Rome or any Rome Subsidiary until the Closing Date, shall be eligible to participate in BHB’sBHLB’s 401(k) plan on the day after the Benefit Plan Determination Date for the RomeLegacy 401(k) Plans. All rights to participate in BHB’sBHLB’s 401(k) Plan are subject to BHB’sBHLB’s right to amend or terminate BHB’sBHLB’s 401(k) plan in its sole and absolute discretion and are subject to the terms of BHB’sBHLB’s 401(k) plan including, but not limited to, the eligibility and vesting provisions of such plan.

7.6.4  Employee Stock Ownership Plan.  BHBBHLB agrees to take all such actions related to the RomeLegacy ESOP as stated in Section 6.14 of this Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

7.6.5  Welfare Benefits.  Each Current RomeLegacy Employee who remains employed on the Benefit Plan Determination Date shall be eligible to participate in group hospitalization, medical, dental, life, disability and other welfare benefit plans and programs available to similarly-situated employees of BHB,BHLB, subject to the terms of such plans and programs, as of the Benefit Plan Determination Date for each such plan or program, conditional upon the Current Rome Employee’s being employed by BHB as of such Benefit Plan Determination Date and subject to complying with eligibility requirements of the respective plans and programs. With respect to any welfare benefit plan or program of RomeLegacy that BHBBHLB determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, provides benefits of the same type or class as a corresponding plan or program maintained by BHB, BHBBHLB, BHLB shall, unless materially financially burdensome or resulting in an excise tax payable by BHLB under Code Section 4980D, continue such RomeLegacy plan or program in effect for the benefit of the Current RomeLegacy Employees so long as they remain eligibleuntil the later of the open enrollment period with respect to participate and until they shall becomethe year following the year in which the Merger occurs or each Current Legacy Employee becomes eligible to become participants in the corresponding benefit plan or program maintained by BHBBHLB (and, with respect to any such plan or program, subject to complying with eligibility requirements and subject to the right of BHBBHLB to terminate or amend such plan or program) so that each Current RomeLegacy Employee employed by BHBBHLB has no gap in coverage under any hospitalization, medial,medical, dental, life, disability or other welfare plan or program. For purposes of all employee welfare benefit plans, programs and agreements maintained by or contributed to by BHB, BHBBHLB, BHLB shall treat, and in the case of an insured plan, shall use its best efforts to cause the providers of each such plan, program or arrangement to treat the service with RomeLegacy prior to the Closing Date of any Current RomeLegacy Employee (to the same extent such service is recognized under analogous plans, programs or arrangements of RomeLegacy prior to the Closing) as service rendered to BHBBHLB for all purposes; provided, however, that such crediting of service shall not operate to duplicate any benefit or the funding of such benefit available to any Current RomeLegacy Employee. Persons who were employed by RomeLegacy or any Affiliate and who were entitled to continue health coverage under COBRA or any similar state law shall continue to be entitled to COBRA coverage and coverage under similar state law under the RomeLegacy Benefit Plans that are health plans and, in the event of a termination of such plans, BHBBHLB shall continue to provide COBRA coverage.

7.6.6  Paid Time Off Programs.  BHBBHLB will give each Current RomeLegacy Employee credit, for purposes of BHB’sBHLB’s vacation and/or other paid leave benefit programs, for such Current RomeLegacy Employees’ accrued and unpaid vacation and/or paid leave balance with RomeLegacy as of the Closing Date.

7.6.7BHBBHLB to Honor Agreements. BHBSubject to any required regulatory approval or satisfaction of a condition in any Regulatory Approval, BHLB agrees to honor all employment agreements, change in control agreements, severance agreements, deferred compensation agreements and consulting agreements that RomeLegacy has with its current and former employees and current and former directors and which have been identified inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.9.1, except to the extent any such agreements shall be superseded or terminated at the Closing Date or following the Closing Date with the written consent of the affected parties. RomeBHLB agrees that in the event a Bank Regulator prohibits Legacy from making any payments or providing any benefits under any agreement referenced inLegacy Disclosure Schedule 4.9.1 in effect as of the Closing Date, BHLB shall make such payments or provide such benefits due under such agreements unless prohibited from doing so by any Bank Regulator. Legacy shall, prior to the Effective Time, use its reasonable best efforts to obtain from each of the current and former employeesindividuals named inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 7.6.7 an agreement, subject to BHB’s approval ofin the form of the agreement, (a “Settlement Agreement”)Exhibit B hereto, setting forth the method in which his or her rights under the specified programs will be settled (the aggregate amount of each such payment is to be limited to the amounts


TABLE OF CONTENTS

specified inRomeLegacy Disclosure Schedule 7.6.7)7.6.7) in the event such individuals are entitled to payment or benefits (each, a “Settlement Agreement”). Notwithstanding anything contained in the agreements set forth onLegacy Disclosure Schedules 4.9.1 and such amountsor7.6.7 or in this Agreement, no payment shall be paidmade under any employment, deferred compensation, change of control, severance contract, stock option plan or plan that would constitute a “parachute payment” (as such term is defined in Section 280G of the Code), and to the extent any such individuals who are employedpayment would constitute a “parachute payment,” the payment will be reduced to $1.00 less than the amount that would be considered a “parachute payment.” In addition, the Settlement Agreement shall provide (i) that an individual shall receive cash in lieu of continued insurance benefits in the event providing such insurance benefits would result in BHLB incurring taxes or penalties under The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or similar legislation, laws or regulations, as in effect at the time that such benefit becomes due or as may be amended from time to time, and (ii) an individual shall not receive a retirement bonus as provided in Legacy’s employee handbook. Such cash payment shall be delivered in a manner consistent with the requirements of Code Section 409A and shall be in an amount reasonably estimated to be equivalent to the present value, using the applicable federal rate (100% of the mid-term) published by the IRS for December 2010 and determined as the date of this Agreement, of the premium payments required to obtain the continued insurance benefits referenced in the preceding sentence on a self-pay basis that would otherwise be provided to the individual. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement or in any Legacy employment agreement, change in control agreement, severance agreement, deferred compensation agreement or consulting agreement, if at any time after the Effective Time, all as set forth in the Settlement Agreement.BHLB or any of its Subsidiaries is precluded by applicable law or regulations from making any payment under any such agreement, BHLB shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain regulatory approval to make such payment and BHLB or a Subsidiary shall make such payment promptly after it is permitted to do so under applicable law and regulations.

Except for the agreements described in the preceding sentences of this Section 7.6.7 and except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, subject to and following the Romeoccurrence of the Effective Time, the Legacy Benefit Plans shall, in the sole and absolute discretion of BHB,BHLB, be frozen, terminated or merged into comparable plans of BHB,BHLB, effective at such time as BHBBHLB shall determine in its sole and absolute discretion.

7.6.8  No Guarantee of Employment.  Except to the extent of commitments herein or other contractual commitments, if any, specifically made or assumed by BHBBHLB hereunder or by operation of law, BHBBHLB shall have no obligation arising from and after the Closing Date to continue in its employ or in any specific job or to provide to any specified level of compensation or any incentive payments, benefits or perquisites to any Person who is an employee of RomeLegacy as of the Closing Date. Each Person who is an employee of RomeLegacy as of the Closing Date and who is terminated by BHBBHLB for a reason other than Causecause within twelve (12) months subsequent to the Closing Date or is not offered employment with BHBBHLB as of the Effective Time or resigns for good reason, excluding those employees who are entitled to benefits under change of control arrangements, shall be entitled to severance benefits equalpursuant to two (2) weeks


TABLE OF CONTENTS

annual cash compensation for each yearBHLB’s current severance plan or policy, if such payments would be more favorable to such Person;provided,however, if such benefits pursuant to Legacy’s plan or policy will result in an excise tax under Code Section 4980D, such plan or policy shall be modified to the extent necessary so as to avoid the imposition of service with a minimumsuch excise tax and the affected participant under such plan or policy shall be paid an additional amount such that his or her benefit, net applicable taxes, equals the value of eight (8) weeks and a maximumthe benefit of twenty-six (26) (in each case less applicable withholdings) plus (ii) transition counseling for outplacement of employees.reduced or eliminated by such action.

7.6.9  Payments.  BHB agrees that Rome shall pay to any Rome Current Employee the bonus amount payable under any bonus plan for 2010SERP and in the event that such bonus is not paid by Rome, BHB shall pay such bonusDirectors’ Plans.  Immediately on the earliest possible date after the bonus amount is determined. BHB agrees that Rome shall be permitted to enter into agreements to make bonus payments to such employees and officers of Rome for the purpose of encouraging such employees and officers to continue in the employ of Rome until the Effective Time, with such payments to be made on the Effective Time; provided that the aggregate of such payments shall not exceed $500,000 and provided, further that the aggregate of such payments to each individual identified inRome Disclosure Schedule 7.6.9 shall not exceed the limit for such individual specified inRome Disclosure Schedule 7.6.9. Rome agrees that it shall not increase the annual rate of salary for Mr. Sprock, and agrees that it shall not raise the annual rate of salary for any individual identified inRome Disclosure Schedule 7.6.9 by more than 5% annually. BHB agrees that Rome shall pay to John Reindhardt a payment of $25,000 on the Effective Time if he is a director of Rome on the date immediately prior to the Effective Time.

7.6.10  Immediatelyor prior to the Effective Time, RomeLegacy shall, in cooperation with BHB,BHLB, subject to the occurrence of the Effective Time, terminate each of the Benefit Restoration PlanSupplemental Executive Retirement Agreement and the Directors’ Fee Continuation Plans of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. and the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and shall pay the amounts due thereunder shall be paid in a lump sum to the participants therein, on or prior to the Effective Time in accordance with Section 409A of the Code.

7.6.10  Retiree Medical, Dental and Life Insurance.  Prior to the Effective Time, Legacy shall, subject to the occurrence of the Effective Time, terminate, modify or freeze, as directed by BHLB, all retiree medical, dental and retiree life insurance plans in accordance with ERISA and the Code in such manner as BHLB may reasonable request.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

7.6.11  Change in Control Agreement and Consulting Agreement.  BHLB will offer Patrick J. Sullivan an executive level position with BHLB and Non-Competition Agreement.  Berkshire Bank and will also enter into an agreement with Mr. Sullivan reflecting the terms of employment. In addition, BHLB agrees to a Settlement Agreement, BHB will enter into a consulting and non-competition agreement with Charles M. Sprock in the formJ. Williar Dunleavy. The forms of such agreements are set forth in BHLBBHBDisclosure Schedule 7.6.11.

7.6.12  Discretionary Compensation.  BHLB shall permit Legacy to pay discretionary compensation of up to an aggregate of $700,000 to such persons under specifically identified compensation plans or programs and in such amounts as set forth inLegacy Disclosure Schedule 7.6.12.

7.7  Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance.

7.7.1  BHBPrior to the Effective Time, BHLB shall maintainobtain and fully pay the premium for the extension of (i) the Side A coverage part (directors’ and officers’ liability) of Legacy’s existing directors’ and officers’ insurance policies, and (ii) Legacy’s existing fiduciary liability insurance policies, in effecteach case for a claims reporting or discovery period of at least six (6) years followingfrom and after the Effective Time, from an insurance carrier with the same or better credit rating as Legacy’s current insurance carrier with respect to directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies maintained by Rome (provided,and fiduciary liability insurance (collectively, “D&O Insurance” and such insurance carrier, the “Insurance Carrier”) with terms, conditions, retentions and limits of liability that BHB may substitute therefor policies ofare at least the same coverage containing terms and conditions which are not materially less favorable)as favorable as Legacy’s existing policies with respect to matters occurringany actual or alleged error, misstatement, misleading statement, act, omission, neglect, breach of duty or any matter claimed against any Person covered thereby that arose, existed, or occurred at or prior to the Effective Time; Time (including in connection with this Agreement or the transactions or actions contemplated hereby);provided,however, that in no event shall BHBBHLB be required to expend pursuant to this Section 7.7.1 more thanfor such “tail” policy a premium amount in excess of an amount equal to 175%200% of the current annual amount expendedpremiums paid by Rome with respect to such insurance,Legacy for D&O Insurance in effect as set forth inRome Disclosure Schedule 7.7.1 (the “Maximum Amount”); provided, further, that if the amount of the aggregate premium necessary to maintain or procure such insurance coverage exceeds the Maximum Amount, BHB shall maintain the most advantageous policiesdate of directors and officers insurance obtainable for an annual premium equal to the Maximum Amount.this Agreement. In connection with the foregoing, RomeLegacy agrees, in order for BHBBHLB to fulfill its agreement, to provide directors and officers liability insurance policies for six (6) years to provide such insurer or substitute insurerthe Insurance Carrier with such representations as such insurer may request with respect to the reporting of any prior claims.

7.7.2  In addition to Section 7.7.1, BHBBHLB shall, from and after the Effective Date, to the fullest extent that would have been permitted to Legacy under Delaware lawDGCL and the Legacy Certificate of Incorporation (to the extent not prohibited by federal law), indemnify, defend and hold harmless each Person who is now, or who has been at any time before the date hereof or who becomes before the Effective Time, an officer or director of RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary (the “Indemnified Parties”) against all losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses (including attorneys’ fees), liabilities or judgments or amounts that are paid in settlement (which settlement shall require the prior written consent of BHB,BHLB, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) of or in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal, or administrative (each, a “Claim”), in which an Indemnified Party is or is threatened to be made a party or witness in whole or in part or arising in whole or in part out of the fact that such Person is or was a director, officer or employee of Rome or a Rome Subsidiaryan Indemnified Party if such Claim pertains to any matter of fact arising, existing, or occurring before the Effective Time (including, without limitation, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby), regardless of whether such Claim is asserted or claimed before, or after, the Effective Time. Any Indemnified Party wishing to claim indemnification under this Section 7.7.2 upon learning of any Claim,


TABLE OF CONTENTS

shall notify BHBBHLB (but the failure so to notify BHBBHLB shall not relieve it from any liability which it may have under this Section 7.7.2, except to the extent such failure materially prejudices BHB)BHLB). In the event of any such Claim (whether arising before or after the Effective Time) (1) BHBBHLB shall have the right to assume the defense thereof (in which event the Indemnified Parties will cooperate in the defense of any such matter) and upon such assumption BHBBHLB shall not be liable to any Indemnified Party for any legal expenses of other counsel or any other expenses subsequently incurred by any Indemnified Party in connection with the defense thereof, except that if BHBBHLB elects not to assume such defense, or counsel for the Indemnified Parties reasonably advises the Indemnified Parties that there are or may be (whether or not any have yet actually arisen) issues which raise conflicts of interest between BHBBHLB and the Indemnified Parties, the Indemnified Parties may retain counsel reasonably satisfactory to them, and BHBBHLB shall pay the reasonable fees and expenses of such counsel for the Indemnified Parties, (2) except to the extent otherwise required due to conflicts of interest, BHBBHLB shall be obligated pursuant to this paragraph to pay


TABLE OF CONTENTS

for only one (1) firm of counsel for all Indemnified Parties unless there is a conflict of interest that necessitates more than one law firm, and (3) BHBBHLB shall not be liable for any settlement effected without its prior written consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed).

7.7.3  In the event that either BHBBHLB or any of its successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other Person and shall not be the continuing or surviving company or entity of such consolidation or merger or (ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties and assets to any Person, then, and in each such case, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and assigns of BHBBHLB shall assume the obligations set forth in this Section 7.7.

7.7.4  The obligations of BHBBHLB provided under this Section 7.7 are intended to be enforceable against BHBBHLB directly by the Indemnified Parties and shall be binding on all respective successors and permitted assigns of BHB.BHLB.

7.8  Stock Listing.

BHBBHLB agrees to file a notification form for the listing on the NASDAQ Stock Market (or such other national securities exchange on which the shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock shall be listed as of the Closing Date) of the shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock to be issued in the Merger.

7.9  Reservation of Stock.

BHBBHLB agrees at all times from the date of this Agreement until the Merger Consideration has been paid in full to reserve a sufficient number of shares of BHBBHLB Common Stock to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement.

7.10  Communications to RomeLegacy Employees; Training

BHBBHLB and RomeLegacy agree that as promptly as practicable following the execution of this Agreement, meetings with employees of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries shall be held at such locations as BHBBHLB and RomeLegacy shall mutually agree, provided that representatives of RomeLegacy shall be permitted to attend such meetings. BHBBHLB and RomeLegacy shall mutually agree in advance as to the scope and content of all communications to the employees of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries. At mutually agreed upon times following execution of this Agreement, representatives of BHBBHLB shall be permitted to meet with the employees of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries to discuss employment opportunities with BHB,BHLB, provided that representatives of RomeLegacy shall be permitted to attend any such meeting. From and after the first date on which all Regulatory Approvals (and waivers, if applicable) and the approval by the shareholders of RomeLegacy Shareholder Approval and the shareholders of BHBBHLB necessary for the consummation of the Merger and Bank Merger (disregarding any waiting period) have been obtained, BHBBHLB shall also be permitted to conduct training sessions outside of normal business hours or at other times as RomeLegacy may agree, with the employees of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries and may conduct such training seminars at any branch location of The Rome Savings Bank;Legacy Banks; provided that BHBBHLB will in good faith attempt to schedule such training sessions in a manner which does not unreasonably interfere with The Rome Savings Bank’sLegacy Banks’ normal business operations.

7.11  Current Information.

During the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, BHLB will cause one or more of its representatives to confer with representatives of Legacy to inform Legacy regarding BHLB’s operations at such times as Legacy may reasonably request. BHLB will promptly notify Legacy of any change in the ordinary course of its business or in the operation of its properties and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, of any governmental complaints, investigations or hearings (or communications indicating that the same may be contemplated), or the institution or the threat of material litigation involving BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary.

7.12  Access to Properties and Records.

Subject to Section 12.1, BHLB shall permit Legacy access upon reasonable notice and at reasonable times to its properties and those of the BHLB Subsidiaries, and shall disclose and make available to Legacy during normal business hours all of its books and records relating to the assets, properties, operations, obligations and liabilities, including, but not limited to, all books of account (including the general ledger), tax


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

records, minute books of directors’ and shareholders’ meetings (other than minutes that discuss any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any other subject matter that BHLB reasonably determines should be kept confidential), organizational documents, bylaws, material contracts and agreements, filings with any regulatory authority, litigation files, plans affecting employees, and any other business activities or prospects in which Legacy may have a reasonable interest; provided, however, that BHLB shall not be required to take any action that would provide access to or to disclose information where such access or disclosure, in BHLB’s reasonable judgment, would interfere with the normal conduct of BHLB’s business or would violate or prejudice the rights or business interests or confidences of any customer or other Person or entity or would result in the waiver by it of the privilege protecting communications between it and any of its counsel or contravene any applicable law. BHLB shall provide and shall request its auditors to provide Legacy with such historical financial information regarding it (and related audit reports and consents) as Legacy may reasonably request for Securities Law disclosure purposes. Legacy shall use commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any interference with BHLB’s regular business operations during any such access to BHLB’s property, books and records. BHLB and each BHLB Subsidiary shall permit Legacy, at Legacy’s expense, to (i) cause a Phase I environmental assessment to be performed at any physical location owned or occupied by BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary and (ii) cause an appraisal to be performed in respect of any real property owned by BHLB or any BHLB Subsidiary.

7.13  Financial and Other Statements.

7.13.1  Promptly upon receipt thereof, BHLB will furnish to Legacy copies of each annual, interim or special audit of the books of BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries made by its independent registered public accountants and copies of all internal control reports submitted to BHLB by such accountants, or by any other accounting firm rendering internal audit services, in connection with each annual, interim or special audit of the books of BHLB and the BHLB Subsidiaries made by such accountants.

7.13.2  As soon as reasonably available, but in no event later than the date such documents are filed with the MDOB, OTS or FDIC, BHLB will deliver to Legacy the BHLB Regulatory Report filed by BHLB or Berkshire Bank. Within twenty-five (25) days after the end of each month, Berkshire Bank will deliver to Legacy a consolidating balance sheet and a consolidating statement of operations, without related notes, for such month prepared in accordance with current financial reporting practices, as well as a month-end and year to date comparison to budget.

7.13.3  BHLB promptly will advise upon receipt and permit review by Legacy of any inquiry or examination report of any Bank Regulator with respect to the condition or activities of BHLB or Berkshire Bank.

7.14  Committee Meetings.

BHLB and Berkshire Bank shall permit Patrick Sullivan to attend any meeting of the Berkshire Bank Loan Review Committee as an observer (the “Legacy Observer”), provided that neither BHLB nor Berkshire Bank shall be required to permit the Legacy Observer to remain present during any confidential discussion of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby or any Acquisition Proposal or during any other matter that the Board of Directors of Berkshire Bank has been advised of by counsel that such attendance by the Legacy Observer may violate or be inconsistent with a confidentiality obligation or fiduciary duty or any legal, regulatory or NASDAQ requirement.

7.15  New Hires.

From the date of this Agreement through the Effective Time, BHLB shall consult with and advise Legacy prior to the hiring by BHLB of any officer for a position of employment to be located in Berkshire County, Massachusetts.

7.16  New Members.

Prior to the Closing, each of BHLB and Berkshire Bank shall increase by the sufficient number of directors constituting the entire Boards of Directors of BHLB and Berkshire Bank, respectively, effective as of and contingent upon the occurrence of the Effective Time, and by a vote of a majority of the directors then in office of each of BHLB and Berkshire Bank, BHLB and Berkshire Bank shall duly elect the New Members to


TABLE OF CONTENTS

fill such vacancies and thereby become a director of BHLB and Berkshire Bank, effective as of and contingent upon the occurrence of the Effective Time. Subject to the requirements of BHLB’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws relating to the relative number of directors in each class, one New Member shall become a member of the class of BHLB’s and Berkshire Bank’s Boards of Directors that has the longest time remaining until its directors’ terms expire and the other New Member shall become a member of the class of BHLB’s and Berkshire Bank’s Boards of Directors that has the second longest time remaining until its directors’ terms expire.

ARTICLE VIII
REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS

8.1  Meeting of Shareholders.

8.1.1  RomeLegacy will (i) take all steps necessary to duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a special meeting of its shareholders as promptly as practicable after the Merger Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC, for the purpose of considering this Agreement and the Merger (the “RomeLegacy Shareholders Meeting”), except as otherwise provided in this section, (ii) in connection with the solicitation of proxies with respect to the RomeLegacy Shareholders Meeting, have its Board of Directors recommend approval of this Agreement to the RomeLegacy shareholders; and (iii) cooperate and consult with BHBBHLB with respect to each of the foregoing matters. The Board of Directors of RomeLegacy may fail to make such a recommendation referred to in clause (ii) above, or withdraw, modify or change any such recommendation only if such Board of Directors, after having consulted with and considered the advice of its financial and legal advisors, has determined that the making of such recommendation, or the failure to withdraw, modify or change its recommendation, would constitute a breach of the fiduciary duties of such directors under applicable law.

8.1.2  To the extent legally required, BHBBHLB will (i) take all steps necessary to duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a special meeting of its shareholders as promptly as practicable after the Merger Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC, for the purpose of considering this Agreement and the Merger (the “BHBBHLB Shareholders Meeting”), (ii) in connection with the solicitation of proxies with respect to the BHBBHLB Shareholders Meeting, have its Board of Directors recommend approval of this Agreement to the BHBBHLB shareholders; and (iii) cooperate and consult with RomeLegacy with respect to each of the foregoing matters. The Board of Directors of BHBBHLB may fail to make such a recommendation referred to in clause (ii) above, or withdraw, modify or change any such recommendation only if such Board of Directors, after having consulted with and considered the advice of its financial and legal advisors, has determined that the making of such recommendation, or the failure to withdraw, modify or change its recommendation, would constitute a breach of the fiduciary duties of such directors under applicable law.law..

8.2  Proxy Statement-Prospectus; Merger Registration Statement.

8.2.1  For the purposes (x)(i) of registering BHBBHLB Common Stock to be offered to holders of RomeLegacy Common Stock in connection with the Merger with the SEC under the Securities Act, (ii) of holding the RomeLegacy Shareholders Meeting and (iii) of holding the BHBBHLB Shareholders Meeting, (if required), BHBBHLB shall draft and prepare, and RomeLegacy shall cooperate in the preparation of, the Merger Registration Statement, including a joint proxy statement and prospectus satisfying all applicable requirements of applicable state securities and banking laws, and of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder (such joint proxy statement/prospectus in the form mailed by RomeLegacy to the RomeLegacy shareholders and by BHBBHLB to the BHBBHLB shareholders, together with any and all amendments or supplements thereto, being herein referred to as the “Proxy Statement-Prospectus”). BHBBHLB shall provide RomeLegacy and its counsel with appropriate opportunity to review and comment on the Proxy Statement-Prospectus, and shall incorporate all appropriate comments thereto, prior to the time it is initially filed with the SEC or any amendments are filed with the SEC. BHBBHLB shall file the Merger Registration Statement, including the Proxy Statement-Prospectus, with the SEC. Each of BHBBHLB and RomeLegacy shall use its reasonable best efforts to have the Merger Registration Statement declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable after such filing, and RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB shall each thereafter promptly mail the Proxy Statement-Prospectus to their respective shareholders. BHBBHLB shall also use its reasonable best efforts to obtain all necessary state securities law or “blue sky” permits and


TABLE OF CONTENTS

approvals required to carry out the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and RomeLegacy shall furnish all information concerning RomeLegacy and the holders of RomeLegacy Common Stock as may be reasonably requested in connection with any such action.

8.2.2  BHBBHLB shall, as soon as practicable but in no event later than November 15, 2010,January 31, 2011, file the Merger Registration Statement with the SEC under the Securities Act in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. BHBBHLB will advise RomeLegacy promptly after BHBBHLB receives notice of the time when the Merger Registration Statement has become effective or any supplement or amendment has been filed, of the issuance of any stop order or the suspension of the registration of the shares of BHB


TABLE OF CONTENTS

BHLB Common Stock issuable pursuant to the Merger Registration Statement, or the initiation or threat of any proceeding for any such purpose, or of any request by the SEC for the amendment or supplement of the Merger Registration Statement, or for additional information, and BHBBHLB will provide RomeLegacy with as many copies of such Merger Registration Statement and all amendments thereto promptly upon the filing thereof as RomeLegacy may reasonably request.

8.2.3  RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB shall promptly notify the other party if at any time it becomes aware that the Proxy Statement-Prospectus or the Merger Registration Statement contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements contained therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. In such event, RomeLegacy shall cooperate with BHBBHLB in the preparation of a supplement or amendment to such Proxy Statement-Prospectus that corrects such misstatement or omission, and BHBBHLB shall file an amended Merger Registration Statement with the SEC, and each of RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB shall mail an amended Proxy Statement-Prospectus to their respective shareholders.

8.3  Regulatory Approvals.

Each of RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB will cooperate with the other and use reasonable efforts to promptly prepare and as soon as practicable following the date hereof but in no event later than November 15, 2010,January 31, 2011, file all necessary documentation to obtain all necessary permits, consents, waivers, approvals and authorizations of the MDOB, the FDIC, the OTS, the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission and any other third parties and Governmental Entities or Bank Regulators necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB will furnish each other and each other’s counsel with all information concerning themselves, their Subsidiaries, directors, officers and shareholders and such other matters as may be necessary or advisable in connection with any application, petition or other statement made by or on behalf of RomeLegacy or BHBBHLB to any Bank Regulator or Governmental Entity in connection with the Merger, Bank Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. RomeLegacy shall have the right to review and approve in advance all characterizations of the information relating to RomeLegacy and any RomeLegacy Subsidiary which appear in any filing made in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement with any Governmental Entity. In addition, RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB shall each furnish to the other for review a copy of each such filing made in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement with any Governmental Entity prior to its filing. To the extent any Governmental Entity makes an inquiry or initiates any proceeding relating to antitrust matters, BHB shallEach of Legacy and BHLB will cooperate with each other and use its commerciallytheir reasonable best efforts to address such mattersany conditions in orderany regulatory approval to allow for the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and BHBby this Agreement;providedhowever, BHLB shall be solely responsible for its and Legacy’s reasonable expenses and Rome’s reasonable costs and expenses related thereto.arising out of required divestitures of deposit liabilities in connection therewith;provided,further,however, BHLB shall not be required to comply with any such condition that would result in a Material Adverse Effect on BHLB or Legacy.

ARTICLE IX
CLOSING CONDITIONS

9.1  Conditions to Each Party’s Obligations under this Agreement.

The respective obligations of each party under this Agreement shall be subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions, none of which may be waived:

9.1.1  Shareholder Approval.  This Agreement and the transactionseach transaction contemplated hereby requiring stockholder approval shall have been approved and adopted by the requisite votes of the shareholders of RomeLegacy and the shareholders of BHB (if required).BHLB.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

9.1.2  Injunctions.  None of the parties hereto shall be subject to any order, decree or injunction of a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, and no statute, rule or regulation shall have been enacted, entered, promulgated, interpreted, applied or enforced by any Governmental Entity or Bank Regulator, that enjoins or prohibits the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

9.1.3  Regulatory Approvals.  All Regulatory Approvals required to complete the Merger and the Bank Merger shall have been obtained and shall remain in full force and effect and all waiting periods relating thereto shall have expired and no such approval, authorization or consent shall include any condition or requirement, excluding standard conditions that are normally imposed by the regulatory authorities in bank merger transactions, that would, in the good faith reasonable judgment of the Board of Directors of BHB result in a Material Adverse Effect on Rome or BHB, or in the good faith reasonable judgment of the Board of Directors of Rome result in a Material Adverse Effect on Rome or BHB.


TABLE OF CONTENTSexpired.

9.1.4  Effectiveness of Merger Registration Statement.  The Merger Registration Statement shall have become effective under the Securities Act and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Merger Registration Statement shall have been issued, and no proceedings for that purpose shall have been initiated or threatened by the SEC and, if the offer and sale of BHBBHLB Common Stock in the Merger is subject to the state securities or “blue sky” laws of any state, shall not be subject to a stop order of any state securities commissioner.

9.1.5  NASDAQ Listing.  BHBBHLB shall have filed a notification form for the listing of the BHBBHLB Common Stock to be issued in the Merger.

9.2  Conditions to the Obligations of BHBBHLB under this Agreement.

The obligations of BHBBHLB under this Agreement shall be further subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Sections 9.2.1 through 9.2.6 at or prior to the Closing Date:

9.2.1  Representations and Warranties.  Each of the representations and warranties of RomeLegacy set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of this Agreement and upon the Effective Time with the same effect as though all such representations and warranties had been made at the Effective Time (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, which only need be true and correct as of such earlier date), in any case subject to the standard set forth in Section 4.1; and RomeLegacy shall have delivered to BHBBHLB a certificate to such effect signed by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of RomeLegacy as of the Effective Time.

9.2.2  Agreements and Covenants.  RomeLegacy and each RomeLegacy Subsidiary shall have performed in all material respects all obligations and complied in all material respects with all agreements or covenants to be performed or complied with by each of them at or prior to the Effective Time, and BHBBHLB shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of RomeLegacy by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of RomeLegacy to such effect dated as of the Effective Time.

9.2.3  Regulatory Conditions.  No Regulatory Approval required for consummation the Merger and Bank Merger shall include any condition or requirement, excluding standard conditions that are normally imposed by the regulatory authorities in bank merger transactions that could reasonably be expected by BHB to result in a Material Adverse Effect on Rome and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.

9.2.4  Permits, Authorizations, Etc.  RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries shall have obtained any and all permits, authorizations, consents, waivers, clearances or approvals required for the lawful consummation of the Merger and the Bank Merger, the failure of which to obtain would have a Material Adverse Effect on Rome, The Rome Savings Bank, BHBeither Legacy or Berkshire Bank.BHLB.

9.2.59.2.4  No Material Adverse Effect.  There shall have been no changes, other than changes contemplated by this Agreement, in the business, operations, condition (financial or otherwise), assets or liabilities of RomeLegacy and the RomeLegacy Subsidiaries (regardless of whether or not such events or changes are inconsistent with the representations and warranties given herein) that individually or in the aggregate has had or reasonably couldwould be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Rome or the Rome Subsidiaries.Legacy.

9.2.69.2.5  Tax OpinionOpinion..  BHB  BHLB shall have received an opinion of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., special counsel to BHB,BHLB, dated the Closing Date, to the effect that the Merger constitutes a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the IRC. In rendering its opinion, such counsel may require and rely upon customary representations contained in certificates of officers of BHB, RomeBHLB, Legacy and their respective Subsidiaries, reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to such counsel.

9.2.6  Regulatory Conditions.  No Regulatory Approval required for consummation the Merger and Bank Merger shall include any condition or requirement that would result in a Material Adverse Effect on BHLB or Legacy, and their Subsidiaries.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

9.3  Conditions to the Obligations of RomeLegacy under this Agreement.

The obligations of RomeLegacy under this Agreement shall be further subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Sections 9.3.1 through 9.3.6 at or prior to the Closing Date:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

9.3.1  Representations and Warranties.  Each of the representations and warranties of BHBBHLB set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of this Agreement and upon the Effective Time with the same effect as though all such representations and warranties had been made at the Effective Time (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, which only need be true and correct as of such earlier date), in any case subject to the standard set forth in Section 5.1; and BHBBHLB shall have delivered to RomeLegacy a certificate to such effect signed by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of BHBBHLB as of the Effective Time.

9.3.2  Agreements and Covenants.  BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank shall have performed in all material respects all obligations and complied in all material respects with all agreements or covenants to be performed or complied with by each of them at or prior to the Effective Time, and RomeLegacy shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of BHBBHLB by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of BHBBHLB to such effect dated as of the Effective Time.

9.3.3  Regulatory Conditions.  No Regulatory Approval required for consummation the Merger and Bank Merger shall include any condition or requirement, excluding standard conditions that are normally imposed by the regulatory authorities in bank merger transactions, that could reasonably be expected by Rome to result in a Material Adverse Effect on BHB and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.

9.3.4  Permits, Authorizations, Etc.  BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank shall have obtained any and all permits, authorizations, consents, waivers, clearances or approvals required for the lawful consummation of the Merger and the Bank Merger, the failure of which to obtain would have a Material Adverse Effect on BHBBHLB and Berkshire Bank, taken as a whole.

9.3.59.3.4  No Material Adverse Effect.There shall have been no changes, other than changes contemplated by this Agreement, in the business, operations, condition (financial or otherwise), assets or liabilities of BHBBHLB and the BHBBHLB Subsidiaries (regardless of whether or not such events or changes are inconsistent with the representations and warranties given herein) that individually or in the aggregate has had or reasonably couldwould be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on BHB or the BHB Subsidiaries.BHLB.

9.3.69.3.5  Tax Opinion.  RomeLegacy shall have received an opinion of Sonnenschein NathNutter McClennen & Rosenthal,Fish LLP, special counsel to Rome,Legacy, dated the Closing Date, to the effect that the Merger constitutes a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the IRC. In rendering its opinion, such counsel may require and rely upon customary representations contained in certificates of officers of BHB, RomeBHLB, Legacy and their respective Subsidiaries, reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to such counsel.

ARTICLE X
THE CLOSING

10.1  Time and Place.[RESERVED]

Subject to the provisions of Articles IX and XI hereof, the Closing of the transactions contemplated hereby shall take place at the offices of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., 5335 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 400, Washington, D.C., at 10:00 a.m. on a date determined by BHB, in its sole discretion, upon five (5) days prior written notice to Rome, but in no event later than thirty (30) days after the last condition precedent (other than those conditions that relate to actions to be taken at the Closing, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver of those conditions) pursuant to this Agreement has been fulfilled or waived (including the expiration of any applicable waiting period), or at such other place, date or time upon which BHB and Rome mutually agree. A pre-closing of the transactions contemplated hereby (the “Pre-Closing”) shall take place at the offices of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., at 10:00 a.m. on the day prior to the Closing Date.

10.2  Deliveries at the Pre-Closing and the Closing.

At the Pre-Closing there shall be delivered to BHB and Rome the opinions, certificates, and other documents and instruments required to be delivered at the Closing under Article IX hereof.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLE XI
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

11.1  Termination.

This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Closing Date, whether before or after approval of the Merger by the shareholders of Rome:BHLB and Legacy (except as otherwise indicated below):

11.1.1  At any time by the mutual written agreement of BHBBHLB and Rome;Legacy;

11.1.2  By either party (provided, that the terminating party is not then in breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained herein) if there shall have been a breach of any of the representations or warranties set forth in this Agreement on the part of the other party, which breach by its nature cannot be cured prior to the Closing Date or shall not have been cured within thirty (30) days after written notice of such breach by the terminating party to the other party, conditioned upon the defaulting party promptly commencing to cure the default and thereafter continuing to cure the default; provided, however, that neither party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11.1.2 unless the breach of representation or warranty, together with all other such breaches, would entitle the terminating party not to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby under Section 9.2.1 (in the case of a breach of a representation or warranty by Rome)Legacy) or Section 9.3.1 (in the case of a breach of a representation or warranty by BHB)BHLB);


TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1.3  By either party (provided, that the terminating party is not then in breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained herein) if there shall have been a failure to perform or comply with any of the covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement on the part of the other party or its Subsidiaries, which failure by its nature cannot be cured prior to the Closing Date or shall not have been cured within thirty (30) days after written notice of such failure by the terminating party to the other party, conditioned upon the defaulting party promptly commencing to cure the default and thereafter continuing to cure; provided, however, that neither party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11.1.3 unless the breach of covenant or agreement, together with all other such breaches, would entitle the terminating party not to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby under Section 9.2.2 (in the case of a breach of covenant by Rome)Legacy) or Section 9.3.2 (in the case of a breach of covenant by BHB)BHLB);

11.1.4  At the election of either party, if the Closing shall not have occurred by the Termination Date, or such later date as shall have been agreed to in writing by BHBBHLB and Rome;Legacy; provided, that no party may terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11.1.4 if the failure of the Closing to have occurred on or before said date was due to such party’s material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in this Agreement;

11.1.5  By either party, if (i) the shareholders of RomeLegacy shall have voted at the RomeLegacy Shareholders Meeting on the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and such vote shall not have been sufficient to approve and adopt such transactions or (ii) the shareholders of BHBBHLB shall have voted on the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (if required) and such vote shall not have been sufficient to approve and adopt such transactions.

11.1.6  By either party if (i) final action has been taken by a Bank Regulator whose approval is required in order to satisfy the conditions to the parties’ obligations to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby as set forth in Article IX, which final action (x) has become unappealable and (y) does not approve this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) any court of competent jurisdiction or other Governmental Entity shall have issued an order, decree, ruling or taken any other action restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger and such order, decree, ruling or other action shall have become final and unappealable;

11.1.7

(A)  By the Board of Directors of BHBBHLB if Romeeach of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) Legacy has received a Superior Proposal and the Board of Directors of RomeLegacy has entered into an acquisition agreement with respect to the Superior Proposal, withdrawn its recommendation of this Agreement, has failed to make such recommendation, or has modified or qualified its recommendation in a manner adverse to BHB.BHLB, (ii) either (x) the Board of Directors of Legacy submits this Agreement to its stockholders without a recommendation for approval or (y) the Board of Directors of Legacy withdraws, qualifies or adversely modifies (or publicly proposes or resolves to withdraw, qualify or adversely modify) its recommendation of this Agreement to the Legacy stockholders,and (iii) the Legacy stockholders do not approve this Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS(B)  By the Board of Directors of Legacy if each of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) either (x) the Board of Directors of BHLB submits this Agreement to its stockholders without a recommendation for approval or (y) Board of Directors of BHLB withdraws, qualifies or adversely modifies (or publicly proposes or resolves to withdraw, qualify or adversely modify) its recommendation of this Agreement to the BHLB stockholdersand (ii) the BHLB stockholders do not approve this Agreement.

11.1.8  By the Board of Directors of RomeLegacy if RomeLegacy has received a Superior Proposal and the Board of Directors of RomeLegacy has made a determination to accept such Superior Proposal; provided that RomeLegacy shall not terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11.1.8 and enter into a definitive agreement with respect to the Superior Proposal until the expiration of three (3) business daysBusiness Days following BHB’sBHLB’s receipt of written notice advising BHBBHLB that RomeLegacy has received a Superior Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal (and including a copy thereof


TABLE OF CONTENTS

with all accompanying documentation, if in writing) identifying the Person making the Superior Proposal and stating whether RomeLegacy intends to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to the Superior Proposal.Proposal (a “Notice of Superior Proposal”). After providing such notice, RomeNotice of Superior Proposal, Legacy shall provide a reasonable opportunity to BHBBHLB during the three (3)-day period to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement as would enable RomeLegacy to proceed with the Merger on such adjusted terms. Any material amendment of such Superior Proposal shall require a new Notice of Superior Proposal and Legacy shall be required to comply again with the requirements of this Section 11.1.8;provided,however, that references to the three (3) Business Day period above shall be deemed to be references to a two (2) Business Day period.

11.1.9  By Legacy, if the Board of Directors of Legacy so determines by a majority vote of the members of the entire Board of Directors of Legacy, at any time during the five-day period commencing on the Determination Date, such termination to be effective on the 30th day following such Determination Date, if and only if both of the following conditions are satisfied:

(1)The BHLB Market Value on the Determination Date is less than $16.70; and
(2)the number obtained by dividing the BHLB Market Value on the Determination Date by the Initial BHLB Market Value shall be less than the number obtained by dividing (x) the Final Index Price by (y) the Initial Index Price minus 0.20;

subject,however, to the following three sentences.

If Legacy elects to exercise its termination right pursuant to this Section 11.1.9, it shall give prompt written notice thereof to BHLB. During the five Business Day period commencing with its receipt of such notice, BHLB shall have the option of paying additional Merger Consideration by increasing the Exchange Ratio to equal the number obtained by dividing (1) $13.00 by the greater of (i) the product of 0.80 and the Initial BHLB Market Value or (ii) the product obtained by multiplying the Index Ratio by the Initial BHLB Market Value. If within such five Business Day period, BHLB delivers written notice to Legacy that it intends to proceed with the Merger by paying such additional consideration as contemplated by the preceding sentence, then no termination shall have occurred pursuant to this Section 11.1.9, and this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms (except that the Exchange Ratio shall have been so modified and, thereafter, any reference in this Agreement to “Stock Consideration” shall be deemed to refer to the Stock Consideration reflecting the Exchange Ratio as modified pursuant to this Section 11.1.9).

For purposes of this Section 11.1.9, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated below:

“Acquisition Transaction” means (i) a merger or consolidation, or any similar transaction, involving the relevant companies, (ii) a purchase, lease or other acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets of the relevant companies, (iii) a purchase or other acquisition (including by way of merger, consolidation, share exchange or otherwise) of securities representing 10% or more of the voting power of the relevant companies; or (iv) agree or commit to take any action referenced above.

“Determination Date” means the first date on which all Requisite Regulatory Approvals (and waivers, if applicable) necessary for consummation of the Merger and the Bank Merger have been received (disregarding any waiting period).


TABLE OF CONTENTS

“Index” means the following companies and the weights attributed to them as follows:

NameTickerIndex
Weighting (%)
Oritani Financial Corp.ORIT0.78
Brookline Bancorp Inc.BRKL0.11
S&T Bancorp Inc.STBA0.84
Independent Bank Corp.INDB0.24
Dime Community Bancshares Inc.DCOM7.37
TrustCo Bank Corp NYTRST6.84
Flushing Financial Corp.FFIC6.31
Hudson Valley Holding Corp.HUVL5.79
Provident New York BancorpPBNY5.67
Danvers Bancorp Inc.DNBK4.97
Lakeland BancorpLBAI3.94
Sterling BancorpSTL3.81
Westfield Financial Inc.WFD3.63
OceanFirst Financial Corp.OCFC3.52
United Financial BancorpUBNK3.48
Abington Bancorp IncABBC3.45
Sun Bancorp Inc.SNBC3.24
Metro Bancorp Inc.METR2.03

“Index Ratio” means the Final Index Price divided by the Initial Index Price.

“Initial BHLB Market Value” means $20.88, adjusted as indicated in the last sentence of this Section 11.1.9.

“Initial Index Price” means the sum of the per share closing sales price of the common stock of each company comprising the Index.

“Final Index Price” means the sum of the Final Prices of each company comprising the Index.

“Final Price” with respect to any company belonging to the Index, means the average of the daily closing sales prices of a share of common stock of such company (and if there is no closing sales price on any such day, then the mean between the closing bid and the closing asked prices on that day), as reported on the consolidated transaction reporting system for the market or exchange on which such common stock is principally traded, for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the Determination Date.

“BHLB Market Value”means, as of any specified date, the average of the daily closing sales prices of a share of BHLB Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding such specified date.

If any company belonging to the Index declares or effects a stock dividend, reclassification, recapitalization, split-up, combination, exchange of shares or similar transaction between the date of this Agreement and the Determination Date, the prices for the common stock of such company shall be appropriately adjusted for the purposes of applying this Section 11.1.9. If a company belonging to the Index announces a sale between the date of this Agreement and the Determination Date, such company shall be removed from the Index and the relative weighting of the companies remaining in the Index shall be appropriately adjusted.

11.1.10  By the Board of Directors of Legacy if the Board of Directors of Legacy has determined in good faith that it is in the best interests of Legacy to enter into an agreement with a third party with respect to a Superior Proposal (such transaction being defined to be an “Alternative Acquisition Agreement”) and provides written notice of such determination to BHLB and terminates this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11.1.10 in each case on or before January 31, 2011, provided that Legacy has


TABLE OF CONTENTS

abided by terms and conditions set forth in Sections 6.11.1, 6.11.2 and 6.11.3, and provided, further, that if Legacy provides BHLB with a Notice of Superior Proposal pursuant to Section 11.1.8 by January 31, 2011, such deadline, but only with respect to an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with the Person making the Acquisition Proposal described in that Notice of Superior Proposal, shall be 11:59 pm (Eastern Time) on the later of (i) January 31, 2001, or (ii) the first Business Day following the expiration of the last of the negotiating periods in Section 11.1.8.

11.2  Effect of Termination.

11.2.1  In the event of termination of this Agreement pursuant to any provision of Section 11.1, this Agreement shall forthwith become void and have no further force, except that (i) the provisions of Sections 11.2, 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 12.5, 12.6, 12.8, 12.9, 12.10, 12.11, and any other section which, by its terms, relates to post-termination rights or obligations, shall survive such termination of this Agreement and remain in full force and effect.

11.2.2  If this Agreement is terminated, expenses and damages of the parties hereto shall be determined as follows:

(A)  Except as provided below, whether or not the Merger is consummated, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses.

(B)  In the event of a termination of this Agreement because of a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement, the breaching party shall remain liable for any and all damages, costs and expenses, including all reasonable attorneys’ fees, sustained or incurred by the non-breaching party as a result thereof or in connection therewith or with respect to the enforcement of its rights hereunder.

(C)  As used in this Agreement, “Termination Fee” shall mean (A) $2,160,000 in connection with the Merger and this Agreement through the termination hereof if the Termination Fee becomes payable in connection with Legacy entering into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement and (B) an amount equal to $4,320,000 in all other circumstances. As a condition of BHB’sBHLB’s willingness, and in order to induce BHBBHLB to enter into this Agreement, and to reimburse BHBBHLB for incurring the costs and expenses related to entering into this Agreement and consummating the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, RomeLegacy hereby agrees to pay BHB,BHLB, and BHBBHLB shall be entitled to payment of, a fee of $3.5 million (the “the Termination Fee”), by wire transfer of same day funds on the earlier of (x) the date of termination or, if such date is not a Business Day, on the next following Business Day or (y) within three (3) business daysBusiness Days after written demand for payment is made by BHB,BHLB, as applicable, following the occurrence of any of the events set forth below:

(i)  RomeLegacy terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 11.1.8 or BHBBHLB terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 11.1.7;11.1.7(A); or

(ii)  The entering into a definitive agreement by RomeLegacy relating to an Acquisition Proposal or the consummation of an Acquisition Proposal involving RomeLegacy within one (1) year after the occurrence of any of the following: (i) the termination of this Agreement by BHBBHLB pursuant to Section 11.1.2 or 11.1.3 because of a breach by RomeLegacy or any RomeLegacy Subsidiary after the occurrence of ana bona fide Acquisition Proposal has been publicly announced or otherwise made known to the shareholderssenior management or board of Rome;directors of Legacy; or (ii) the termination of this Agreement by BHBBHLB or RomeLegacy pursuant to Section 11.1.5 because of the failure of the shareholders of RomeLegacy to approve this Agreement at the RomeLegacy Shareholders Meeting after the occurrence of an Acquisition Proposal has been publicly announced or otherwise made known to the shareholders of Rome.Legacy provided, however, that for the purpose of this clause (ii), all references in the definition of Acquisition Proposal to “25% or more” shall instead refer to “40% or more.”


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(D)  Upon payment ofIn the event that Legacy shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11.1.7(B), BHLB shall pay to Legacy the Termination Fee by wire transfer of same day funds no later than the second Business Day following such termination.

(E)  Legacy and BHLB acknowledge that the agreements contained in this Section 11.2.2 are an integral part of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and that, without these agreements, neither party would enter into this Agreement. The amounts payable by Legacy and BHLB pursuant to this Section 11.2.2(C), BHB will11.2.2 constitute liquidated damages and not have any other rights or claims against Rome or any Rome Subsidiary, or their respective officersa penalty and directors, under this Agreement, it being agreed that the acceptance of the Termination Fee under Section 11.2.2(C) will constituteshall be the sole and exclusive monetary remedy of BHB against Rome and its Subsidiaries and their respective officers and directors.such party in the event of termination of this Agreement on the bases specified in such section.

11.3  Amendment, Extension and Waiver.

Subject to applicable law, at any time prior to the Effective Time (whether before or after approval thereof by the shareholders of Rome)Legacy or BHLB), the parties hereto by action of their respective Boards of Directors, may (a) amend this Agreement, (b) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of any other party hereto, (c) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto, or (d) waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions contained herein; provided, however, that after any approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby by the shareholders of Rome,Legacy or BHLB (as applicable), there may not be, without further approval of such shareholders, any amendment of this Agreement which reducesdecreases or increases the amount or value, or changes the form of, the Merger Consideration to be delivered to Rome’sLegacy’s shareholders pursuant to this Agreement. This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party, but such waiver or failure to insist on strict compliance with such obligation, covenant, agreement or condition shall not operate as a waiver of, or estoppel with respect to, any subsequent or other failure. Any termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Article XI may only be effected upon a vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors of the terminating party.

11.4  Additional Provisions Regarding Termination:

Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement;

(A)BHLB may not terminate this Agreement on account of the failure of a Regulatory Approval closing condition due to a requirement, whether contained in any Regulatory Approval or as a condition necessary to obtain any Regulatory Approval, to divest liabilities and assets that would constitute a Material Adverse Effect, unless (i) BHLB gives Legacy thirty (30) days written notice of its intention to do so (“Notice of Divestiture MAE”), (ii) BHLB provides Legacy with BHLB’s written analysis of the economic impact of the required divestiture on the benefits of the proposed Transaction to BHLB, taken as a whole together with such divestiture and the reasonably anticipated proceeds thereof, (iii) BHLB proposes in the Notice of Divestiture MAE such adjustments, modifications or amendments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement as would enable BHLB to proceed with the Merger, and (iv) BHLB negotiates in good faith with Legacy to make such adjustments, modifications or amendments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement as would enable the BHLB to proceed with the Merger.
(B)The limitations on solicitation by Legacy as set forth in Section 6.11, as well as Legacy’s obligation under Section 8.1.1 to hold a Special Meeting of Stockholders to vote upon the transaction contemplated in this Agreement, will be suspended upon BHLB’s delivery of the Notice of Divestiture MAE, regardless, in the case of Section 6.11, whether or not the Legacy Shareholder Vote shall have been obtained.
(C)If, within twenty-five (25) days after Legacy’s receipt of a Notice of Divestiture MAE, BHLB and Legacy do not amend to this Agreement, Legacy may (i) sue BHLB to enforce its rights under this Agreement or (ii) terminate this Agreement at no cost to Legacy.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(D)In any dispute regarding the existence of a Material Adverse Effect, the existence of the amount specified in clause (vi) of the definition of Material Adverse Effect will not prejudice Legacy’s ability to assert that a greater divestiture does not constitute a Material Adverse Effect.

ARTICLE XII
MISCELLANEOUS

12.1  Confidentiality.

Except as specifically set forth herein, BHBBHLB and RomeLegacy mutually agree to be bound by the terms of the Confidentiality Agreements, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and all information furnished by either party to the other party or its representatives pursuant hereto (including pursuant to Sections 6.2 and 6.3) shall be subject to, and the parties shall hold such information in confidence in accordance with, the provisions of the Confidentiality Agreements. The parties hereto agree that the Confidentiality Agreements shall continue in accordance with its terms, notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement.

12.2  Public Announcements.

RomeLegacy and BHBBHLB shall cooperate with each other in the development and distribution of all news releases and other public disclosures with respect to this Agreement, and except as may be otherwise required by law, neither RomeLegacy nor BHBBHLB shall issue any news release, or other public announcement or communication with respect to this Agreement unless such news release or other public announcement or communication has been mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto.

12.3  Survival.

All representations, warranties and covenants in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant hereto shall expire and be terminated and extinguished at the Effective Time, except for those covenants and agreements contained herein which by their terms apply in whole or in part after the Effective Time.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

12.4  Notices.

All notices or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if delivered by (i) receipted hand delivery, (ii) facsimile with confirmation of transmission, (iii) mailed by prepaid registered or certified mail (return receipt requested), or (iv) by recognized overnight courier addressed as follows:

 
If to Rome,Legacy, to: Charles M. SprockJ. Williar Dunlaevy
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman President and CEOof the Board
RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.
100 W. Dominick99 North Street
Rome, New York 13440Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
With required copies to: Matthew Dyckman,Patrick Sullivan
President
Legacy Bancorp, Inc.
99 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
Kimberly Mathews
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Legacy Bancorp, Inc.
99 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201
Michael K. Krebs, Esq.
SNR Denton USNutter McClennen & Fish LLP
1301 K Street, N.W.Seaport West
Suite 600, East Tower155 Seaport Boulevard
Washington, DC 20005Boston, Massachusetts 02210

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If to BHB,BHLB, to: Michael P. Daly
President and CEOChief Executive Officer
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 02101
With required copies to: Wm. Gordon Prescott
Vice President and General Counsel
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, Massachusetts 02101
   Lawrence Spaccassi, Esq.
Marc Levy, Esq.
Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C.
5335 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Suite 400780
Washington, DC 20015

or such other address as shall be furnished in writing by any party, and any such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given, as applicable: (i) as of the date delivered by hand, (ii) upon confirmation of transmission, (iii) three (3) business daysBusiness Days after being delivered to the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, or (iv) one (1) business dayBusiness Day after being delivered to the overnight courier.

12.5  Parties in Interest.

This Agreement and the Voting Agreements shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto or thereto and their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, that neither this Agreement and the Voting Agreements nor any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder or thereunder shall be assigned by any party hereto without the prior written consent of the other party. Except for Section 7.6.7, 7.6.8, 7.6.9 and 7.7 hereof nothing in this Agreement is intended to confer upon any Person or entity other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement.

12.6  Complete Agreement.

This Agreement, including the Exhibits and Disclosure Schedules hereto and the documents and other writings referred to herein or therein or delivered pursuant hereto, and the Confidentiality Agreements, contains the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to its subject matter. There are no restrictions, agreements, promises, warranties, covenants or undertakings between the parties other than those


TABLE OF CONTENTS

expressly set forth herein or therein. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings (other than the Confidentiality Agreements) between the parties, both written and oral, with respect to its subject matter.

12.7  Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and each of which shall be deemed an original. A facsimile or other electronic copy of a signature page shall be deemed to be an original signature page.

12.8  Severability.

In the event that any one or more provisions of this Agreement shall for any reason be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions of this Agreement and the parties shall use their reasonable efforts to substitute a valid, legal and enforceable provision which, insofar as practical, implements the purposes and intents of this Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

12.9  Governing Law.

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.

12.10  Interpretation.

When a reference is made in this Agreement to Articles, Sections or Exhibits, such reference shall be to an Article or Section of or Exhibit to this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The recitals hereto constitute an integral part of this Agreement. References to sections include subsections, which are part of the related Section (e.g., a section numbered “Section 5.5.1” would be part of “Section 5.5” and references to “Section 5.5” would also refer to material contained in the subsection described as “Section 5.5.1”). The table of contents, index and headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words “include”, “includes” or “including” are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation”. The phrases “the date of this Agreement”, “the date hereof” and terms of similar import, unless the context otherwise requires, shall be deemed to refer to the date set forth in the Preamble to this Agreement. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

12.11  Specific Performance.

The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that the provisions contained in this Agreement were not performed in accordance with its specific terms or was otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions, without the posting of bond or other security, to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof in any court of the United States or any state having jurisdiction, this being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity.

12.12  Waiver Each party agrees that it will not seek and will agree to waive any requirement for the securing or posting of Trial by Jury.

The parties hereto hereby knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally waive the right any may have to a trial by jury in respect to any litigation based hereon, or rising out of, under, orbond in connection with this Agreement and any agreement contemplated to be executed in connection herewith,the other party’s seeking or any course of conduct, course of dealing, statements (whether verbal or written) or actions of either party in connection withobtaining such agreements.relief.

[Signature Page FollowsFollows]]


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed under seal by their duly authorized officers as of the date first set forth above.

 
 BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.
   /s/ Michael P. Daly
Name:  Michael P. Daly
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
   ROMELEGACY BANCORP, INC.
   /s/ Charles M. SprockJ. Williar Dunlaevy
Name:  Charles M. SprockJ. Williar Dunlaevy
Title:   Chairman President and Chief Executive Officer

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEXAPPENDIX B

 
  Sandler
  O’neill
+ Partners[GRAPHIC MISSING]
 INVESTMENT BANKING GROUP

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods

October 12,December 21, 2010

The Board of Directors
RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.
100 West Dominick99 North Street
P.O. Box 311
Rome, NY 13440Pittsfield, MA 01201

Ladies and Gentlemen:Members of the Board:

RomeYou have requested our opinion as investment bankers as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. (“Rome”Legacy”) of the Merger Consideration, as defined below, in the proposed merger (the “Merger”) of Legacy and Berkshire Hills Bancorp.Bancorp, Inc., Inc. (“Berkshire”) have entered into anpursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 12,December 21, 2010, between Legacy and Berkshire (the “Agreement”), pursuant. Pursuant to which Rome will be merged with and into Berkshire (the “Merger”), with Berkshire as the surviving entity. Under the terms of the Agreement, at the Effective Time and as a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of Rome common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Legacy (the “Rome Common Stock”“Common Shares”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted into the right to receive at the election0.56385 shares of the holder thereof and subject to the election and allocation procedures set forth in the Agreement: (i) 0.5658 share (the “Exchange Ratio”) of Berkshire common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Berkshire and $1.30 in cash (the “Berkshire“Merger Consideration”).

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc, has acted as financial advisor to the Legacy. As part of our investment banking business, we are continually engaged in the valuation of bank and bank holding company securities in connection with acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for various other purposes. As specialists in the securities of banking companies, we have experience in, and knowledge of, the valuation of banking enterprises. In the ordinary course of our business as a broker-dealer, we may, from time to time purchase securities from, and sell securities to, Legacy and Berkshire, and as a market maker in securities, we may from time to time have a long or short position in, and buy or sell, debt or equity securities of Legacy and Berkshire for our own account and for the accounts of our customers. To the extent we have any such position as of the date of this opinion it has been disclosed to Legacy. We have acted exclusively for the Board of Directors of Legacy in rendering this fairness opinion and will receive a fee from Legacy for our services. A portion of our fee is contingent upon the successful completion of the Merger.

During the past two years we acted as co-manager on the May 12, 2009 Berkshire common equity offering.

In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed, analyzed and relied upon material bearing upon the financial and operating condition of Legacy and Berkshire and the Merger, including among other things, the following: (i) the Agreement; (ii) the Annual Reports to Stockholders and Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the three years ended December 31, 2009 of Legacy and Berkshire; (iii) certain interim reports to stockholders and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q of Legacy and Berkshire and certain other communications from Legacy and Berkshire to their respective stockholders; and (iv) other financial information concerning the businesses and operations of Legacy and Berkshire furnished to us by Legacy and Berkshire for purposes of our analysis. We have also held discussions with senior management of Legacy and Berkshire regarding the past and current business operations, regulatory relations, financial condition and future prospects of their respective companies and such other matters as we have deemed relevant to our inquiry. In addition, we have compared certain financial and stock market information for Legacy and Berkshire with similar information for certain other companies the securities of which are publicly traded, reviewed the financial terms of certain recent business combinations in the banking industry and performed such other studies and analyses as we considered appropriate.

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods • 787 Seventh Avenue • New York, NY 10019
212.887.7777 • Toll Free 800.966.1559 •www.kbw.com


TABLE OF CONTENTS

In conducting our review and arriving at our opinion, we have relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information provided to us or publicly available and we have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of any such information or assumed any responsibility for such verification or accuracy. We have relied upon the management of Legacy and Berkshire as to the reasonableness and achievability of the financial and operating forecasts and projections (and the assumptions and bases therefore) provided to us, and we have assumed that such forecasts and projections reflect the best currently available estimates and judgments of such managements and that such forecasts and projections will be realized in the amounts and in the time periods currently estimated by such managements. We are not experts in the independent verification of the adequacy of allowances for loan and lease losses and we have assumed, with your consent, that the aggregate allowances for loan and lease losses for Legacy and Berkshire are adequate to cover such losses. In rendering our opinion, we have not made or obtained any evaluations or appraisals of the property of Legacy or Berkshire, nor have we examined any individual credit files.

We have assumed that, in all respects material to our analyses, the following: (i) the Merger will be completed substantially in accordance with the terms set forth in the Agreement with no additional payments or adjustments to the Merger Consideration; (ii) the representations and warranties of each party in the Agreement and in all related documents and instruments referred to in the Agreement are true and correct; (iii) each party to the Agreement and all related documents will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by such party under such documents; (iv) all conditions to the completion of the Merger will be satisfied without any waivers; and (v) in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory, contractual, or other consents or approvals for the Merger, no restrictions, including any divestiture requirements, termination or other payments or amendments or modifications, will be imposed that will have a material adverse effect on the future results of operations or financial condition of the combined entity or the contemplated benefits of the Merger, including the cost savings, revenue enhancements and related expenses expected to result from the Merger.

We have considered such financial and other factors as we have deemed appropriate under the circumstances, including, among others, the following: (i) the historical and current financial position and results of operations of Legacy and Berkshire; (ii) the assets and liabilities of Legacy and Berkshire; and (iii) the nature and terms of certain other merger transactions involving banks and bank holding companies. We have also taken into account our assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions and our experience in other transactions, as well as our experience in securities valuation and knowledge of the banking industry generally. Our opinion is necessarily based upon conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date hereof and the information made available to us through the date hereof. Our opinion does not address the underlying business decision of Legacy to engage in the Merger, or the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any strategic alternatives that may be available to the Legacy.

We are not expressing any opinion about the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation to any of the Legacy’s officers, directors or employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the compensation to the public shareholders of the Legacy.

This opinion has been reviewed and approved by our Fairness Opinion Committee in conformity with our policies and procedures established under the requirements of Rule 2290 of the NASD Rules of the Financial Institutions Regulatory Authority.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration in the Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to holders of the Common Shares.

Very truly yours,

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDIX C

INVESTMENT BANKING GROUP

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

December 21, 2010

Board of Directors
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
24 North Street
Pittsfield, MA 01201

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. (“Berkshire Hills”) and Legacy Bancorp, Inc. (“Legacy”) have entered into a Plan of Merger and Merger Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2010 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Legacy will merge with and into Berkshire Hills (the “Merger”). Under the terms of the Agreement, upon consummation of the Merger, each share of Legacy common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger (the “Legacy Common Stock”) or, other than certain shares specified in the Agreement, will be converted into the right to receive 0.56385 of a share of Berkshire Hills common stock (the “Exchange Ratio”) and (ii) $11.25$1.30 in cash without interest (the “Cash Consideration”(such cash and together with the Exchange Ratio, together, the “Merger Consideration”). Cash will be paidThe terms of the Merger are more fully described in lieu of fractional shares.the Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assignedgiven to them in the Agreement. The othersuch terms and conditions of the Merger are more fully set forth in the Agreement. You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Merger Consideration to the holders of Rome Common Stock.Berkshire Hills.

Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P., as part of its investment banking business, is regularly engaged in the valuation of financial institutions and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions. In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed, among other things: (i) the Agreement; (ii) certain publicly available financial statements and other historical financial information of RomeBerkshire Hills that we deemed relevant; (iii) certain publicly available financial statements and other historical financial information of BerkshireLegacy that we deemed relevant; (iv) internal financial projections for Rome for the year ended December 31, 2010 and estimated growth and performance for the years ended December 31, 2011 through 2014, in each case as provided by, and reviewed with, senior management of Rome; (v)publicly available consensus earnings per share estimates for Berkshire Hills for the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2012 as published by I/B/E/S and reviewed with management of Berkshire and long-term estimated growth ratefinancial projections for the years thereafter asthrough 2014 determined using estimated growth rates provided by and discussed with senior management of Berkshire;Berkshire Hills; (v) internal financial projections for Legacy for the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2011 as provided by Legacy and adjusted by senior management of Berkshire Hills, financial projections for the years thereafter through 2014 determined using estimated growth rates provided by and discussed with senior management of Berkshire Hills; (vi) the pro forma financial impact of the Merger on Berkshire Hills based on assumptions relating to transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments, and cost savings and other synergies as determined by the senior management of Berkshire;Berkshire Hills; (vii) the publicly reported historical price and trading activity for Rome’s and Berkshire’s common stock, including a comparison of certain financial and stock market information for RomeBerkshire Hills and Berkshire andLegacy with similar institutions for which publicly available information for certain other companies the securities of which are publicly traded;is available; (viii) the financial terms of certain recent business combinations in the commercial banking industry, to the extent publicly available; (ix) the current market environment generally and the banking environment in particular; and (x) such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria as we considered relevant. We also discussed with certain members of senior management of RomeBerkshire Hills the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of RomeBerkshire Hills and held similar discussions with certain members of senior management of BerkshireLegacy regarding the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Berkshire.Legacy.

 
+  Sandler O’Neill + Partners, L.P.
    919 Third Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10022
    T: (212) 466-7700466-7100 F: (212) 466-7711
 + www.SandlerOneill.com  www.SandlerOneill.com

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

In performing our review, we have relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information that was available to us from public sources, or that was provided to us by RomeBerkshire Hills and BerkshireLegacy or their respective representatives or that was otherwise reviewed by us and have assumed such accuracy and completeness for purposes of rendering this opinion. We have further relied on the assurances of managementthe respective managements of RomeBerkshire Hills and BerkshireLegacy that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make any of such information inaccurate or misleading. We have not been asked to and have not undertaken an independent verification of any of such information and we do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness thereof. We did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the specific assets, the collateral securing assets or the liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of RomeBerkshire Hills and BerkshireLegacy or any of their subsidiaries,respective subsidiaries. We render no opinion or evaluation on the collectability of any assets or the collectibilityfuture performance of any such assets.loans of Berkshire Hills and Legacy. We did not make an independent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses of RomeBerkshire Hills and Berkshire norLegacy, or the combined entity after the Merger and we have we not reviewed any individual credit files relating to RomeBerkshire Hills and Berkshire.Legacy. We did not make an independent evaluation and render no opinionhave assumed, with respect toyour consent, that the adequacy of therespective allowances for loan losses for both RomeBerkshire Hills and Berkshire orLegacy are adequate to cover such losses and will be adequate on a pro forma basis for the combined entity.

With respect to theIn preparing its analyses, Sandler O’Neill used publicly earnings projections and long-term growth rates for Berkshire Hills as discussed with senior management of Berkshire Hills and internal financial projections for RomeLegacy as provided by senior management of Legacy and as adjusted based on discussions with senior management of Berkshire Hills. Sandler O’Neill also received and used in its analysis certain projections of transaction costs, purchase accounting adjustments, expected cost savings and other synergies which were prepared by and/or reviewed with the senior management of RomeBerkshire Hills. With respect to those projections, estimates and judgments, the consensus estimates used for Berkshire and discussed with the managementrespective managements of Berkshire Hills and in each case used by us in our analyses, Rome’s and Berkshire’s respective managementsLegacy confirmed to us that theythose projections, estimates and judgments reflected the best currently available estimates and judgments of those respective managements of the respective future financial performancesperformance of RomeBerkshire Hills and Berkshire,Legacy, respectively, and we assumed that such performances would be achieved. With respect to the projections of transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments and cost savings determined by and reviewed with the senior management of Berkshire, management confirmed to us that they reflected the best currently available estimates and judgments of such management and we assumed that such performancesperformance would be achieved. We express no opinion as to such financial projectionsestimates or the assumptions on which they are based. We have also assumed that there has been no material change in Rome’s or Berkshire’sBerkshire Hills’ and Legacy’s assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since the date of the most recent financial statements made available to us. We have assumed in all respects material to our analysis that RomeBerkshire Hills and BerkshireLegacy will remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to our analyses, that all of the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement and all related agreements are true and correct, that each party to the agreements will perform all of the covenants required to be performed by such party under the agreements, that the conditions precedent in the agreementsAgreement are not waived and that the Merger will bequalify as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. Finally, with your consent, we have relied upon the advice RomeBerkshire Hills has received from its legal, accounting and tax advisors as to all legal, accounting and tax matters relating to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Agreement.

Our opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. Events occurring after the date hereof could materially affect this opinion. We have not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw this opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date hereof. We are expressing no opinion herein as to what the value of Berkshire’s common stock will be when issued to Rome’s shareholders pursuant to the Agreement or the prices at which Rome’s and Berkshire’s common stock may trade at any time.

We have acted as Rome’sBerkshire Hills’ financial advisor in connection with the Merger and will receive a fee for our services, a substantial portion of which is contingent upon consummation of the Merger. We will also receive a fee for this fairness opinion. RomeBerkshire Hills has also agreed to indemnify us against certain liabilities arising out of our engagement. As we have advised you previously, in the past we have performed investment banking services for, and received compensation for such services from, Rome and Berkshire.

In the ordinary course of our business as a broker-dealer, we may purchase securities from and sell securities to RomeBerkshire Hills and BerkshireLegacy and their affiliates. We may also actively trade the equity or debt securities of Rome and Berkshire or their affiliates for our own account and for the accounts of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

Our opinion is directed to the Board of Directors of RomeBerkshire Hills in connection with its consideration of the Merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of either Berkshire Hills or Legacy as to how any such shareholder should vote at any meeting of shareholders called to consider and vote upon the Merger. Our opinion is directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Merger Consideration to the holders of Rome Common StockBerkshire Hills and does not address the underlying business decision of RomeBerkshire Hills to engage in the Merger, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any other alternative business strategies that might exist for RomeBerkshire Hills or the effect of any other transaction in which RomeBerkshire Hills might engage. OurThis opinion isshall not to be quotedreproduced or referred to, in whole or in part, in a registration statement, prospectus, proxy statement or in any other document, nor shall this opinion be used for any other purposes, without ourSandler O’Neill’s prior written consent. This opinionOpinion has been approved by Sandler O’Neill’s fairness opinion committee and doescommittee. We do not addressexpress any opinion as to the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation to be received in the Merger by any Rome officer, director, or employee.employees, or class of such persons, relative to the compensation to be received in the Merger by any other shareholder.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, that the Merger Consideration is fair to the holders of Rome Common StockBerkshire Hills from a financial point of view.

Very truly yours,

[GRAPHIC MISSING][GRAPHIC MISSING]


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Annex CAPPENDIX D

DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
TITLE 8
CORPORATIONS
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
Subchapter IX. Merger, Consolidation or Conversion

§ 262 Appraisal Rights.

(a)  Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the mergerMerger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the stockholder’s shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section, the word “stockholder” means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words “stock” and “share” mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and the words “depository receipt” mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.

(b)  Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a mergerMerger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to § 251 (other than a mergerMerger effected pursuant to § 251(g) of this title), § 252, § 254, § 257, § 258, § 263 or § 264 of this title:

(1)  Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of the meeting of stockholders to act upon the agreement of mergerMerger or consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national securities exchange or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a mergerMerger if the mergerMerger did not require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided in §251(f) of this title.

(2)  Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of an agreement of mergerMerger or consolidation pursuant to §§251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this title to accept for such stock anything except:

a.  Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such mergerMerger or consolidation, or depository receipts in respect thereof;

b.  Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts at the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 holders;

c.  Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a. and b. of this paragraph; or

d.  Any combination of the shares of stock, depository receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a., b. and c. of this paragraph.

(3)  In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware corporation party to a mergerMerger effected under § 253 of this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately prior to the merger,Merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c)  Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its


TABLE OF CONTENTS

certificate of incorporation, any mergerMerger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.

(d)  Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:

(1)  If a proposed mergerMerger or consolidation for which appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available pursuant to subsections (b) or (c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholder’s shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of the vote on the mergerMerger or consolidation, a written demand for appraisal of such stockholder’s shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholder’s shares. A proxy or vote against the mergerMerger or consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to take such action must do so by a separate written demand as herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of such mergerMerger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not voted in favor of or consented to the mergerMerger or consolidation of the date that the mergerMerger or consolidation has become effective; or

(2)  If the mergerMerger or consolidation was approved pursuant to § 228 or § 253 of this title, then either a constituent corporation before the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the mergerMerger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, shall, also notify such stockholders of the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice, demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation the appraisal of such holder’s shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such holder’s shares. If such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, either (i) each such constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation notifying each of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation or (ii) the surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded appraisal of such holder’s shares in accordance with this subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix, in advance, a record date that shall be not more than 10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided, that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, the record date shall be such effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the notice is given.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(e)  Within 120 days after the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after


TABLE OF CONTENTS

the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder’s demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the mergerMerger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d) of this section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the mergerMerger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the mergerMerger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder’s written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is later. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such person’s own name, file a petition or request from the corporation the statement described in this subsection.

(f)  Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.

(g)  At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.

(h)  After the Court determines the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through such proceeding the Court shall determine the fair value of the shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the mergerMerger or consolidation, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the mergerMerger through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective date of the mergerMerger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such stockholder’s certificates of


TABLE OF CONTENTS

stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.

(i)  The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares


TABLE OF CONTENTS

represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court’s decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.

(j)  The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney’s fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.

(k)  From and after the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder’s demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the mergerMerger or consolidation, either within 60 days after the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just; provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such stockholder’s demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the mergerMerger or consolidation within 60 days after the effective date of the mergerMerger or consolidation, as set forth in subsection (e) of this section.

(l)  The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the mergerMerger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDIX E

ARTICLE FOURTH:

A.The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is fifty-one million (51,000,000) consisting of:
1.One million (1,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value one cent ($0.01) per share (the “Preferred Stock”); and
2.Fifty million (50,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value one cent ($0.01) per share (the “Common Stock”).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II



INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

ITEM 20. INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware corporation subject to the applicable indemnification provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware Corporation Law”). Section 145 of the Delaware Corporation Law provides for the indemnification, under certain circumstances, of persons who are or were directors, officers, employees or agents of Berkshire Hills, or are or were serving at the request of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. in such a capacity with another business organization or entity, against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement in actions, suits or proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, brought or threatened against or involving such persons because of such person’s service in any such capacity. In the case of actions brought by or in the right of Berkshire Hills, Bancorp, Inc., Section 145 provides for indemnification only of expenses, and only upon a determination by the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought that, in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses.

The Tenth and Eleventh articles of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.’sHills’ certificate of incorporation provide as follows:

TENTH:

A. Each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a Director or an Officer of the Corporation or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a Director, Officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan (hereinafter an “indemnitee”), whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a Director, Officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity while serving as a Director, Officer, employee or agent, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended (but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits the Corporation to provide broader indemnification rights than such law permitted the Corporation to provide prior to such amendment), against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such indemnitee in connection therewith; provided, however, that, except as provided in Section C hereof with respect to proceedings to enforced rights to indemnification, the Corporation shall indemnify any such indemnitee in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such indemnitee only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

B. The right to indemnification conferred in Section A of this Article TENTH shall include the right to be paid by the Corporation the expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition (hereinafter an “advancement of expenses”); provided, however, that, if the Delaware General Corporation Law requires, an advancement of expenses incurred by an indemnitee in his or her capacity as a Director or Officer (and not in any other capacity in which service was or is rendered by such indemnitee, including, without limitation, services to an employee benefit plan) shall be made only upon delivery to the Corporation of an undertaking (hereinafter an “undertaking”), by or on behalf of such indemnitee, to repay all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined by final judicial decision from which there is no further right to appeal (hereinafter a “final adjudication”) that such indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified for such expenses under this Section or otherwise. The rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses conferred in Sections A and B of this Article TENTH shall be contract rights and such rights shall continue as to an indemnitee who has ceased to be a Director, Officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the indemnitee’s heirs, executors and administrators.

II-1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

C. If a claim under Section A or B of this Article TENTH is not paid in full by the Corporation within sixty days after a written claim has been received by the Corporation, except in the case of a claim for an advancement of expenses, in which case the applicable period shall be twenty days, the indemnitee may at

II-1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

any time thereafter bring suit against the Corporation to recover the unpaid amount of the claim. If successful in whole or in part in any such suit, or in a suit brought by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an undertaking, the indemnitee shall be entitled to be paid also the expenses of prosecuting or defending such suit. In (i) any suit brought by the indemnitee to enforce a right to indemnification hereunder (but not in a suit brought by the indemnitee to enforce a right to an advancement of expenses) it shall be a defense that, and (ii) in any suit by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an undertaking the Corporation shall be entitled to recover such expenses upon a final adjudication that, the indemnitee has not met any applicable standard for indemnification set forth in the Delaware General Corporation Law. Neither the failure of the Corporation (including its Board of Directors, independent legal counsel, or its stockholders) to have made a determination prior to the commencement of such suit that indemnification of the indemnitee is proper in the circumstances because the indemnitee has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in the Delaware General Corporation Law, nor an actual determination by the Corporation (including its Board of Directors, independent legal counsel, or its stockholders) that the indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall create a presumption that the indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct or, in the case of such a suit brought by the indemnitee, be a defense to such suit. In any suit brought by the indemnitee to enforce a right to indemnification or to an advancement of expenses hereunder, or by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an undertaking, the burden of proving that the indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified, or to such advancement of expenses, under this Article TENTH or otherwise shall be on the Corporation.

D. The rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses conferred in this Article TENTH shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, agreement, vote of stockholders or Disinterested Directors or otherwise.

E. The Corporation may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect itself and any Director, Officer, employee or agent of the Corporation or subsidiary or Affiliate or another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not the Corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the Delaware General Corporation Law.

F. The Corporation may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors, grant rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to any employee or agent of the Corporation to the fullest extent of the provisions of this Article TENTH with respect to the indemnification and advancement of expenses of Directors and Officers of the Corporation.

ELEVENTH:

A Director of this Corporation shall not be personally liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a Director, except for liability: (i) for any breach of the Director’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or (iv) for any transaction from which the Director derived an improper personal benefit. If the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of Directors, then the liability of a Director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, as so amended.

Any repeal or modification of the foregoing paragraph by the stockholders of the Corporation shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a Director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification.

The foregoing indemnity and insurance provisions have the effect of reducing directors’ and officers’ exposure to personal liability for actions taken in connection with their respective positions.

II-2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of Berkshire pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, Berkshire has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such

II-2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by Berkshire of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of Berkshire in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, Berkshire will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

ITEM 21. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a) A list of the exhibits included as part of this registration statement is set forth on the index of exhibits immediately preceding such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.

(b) All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been omitted because they are not required, amounts which would otherwise be required to be shown with respect to any item are not material, are inapplicable or the required information has already been provided elsewhere in the registration statement.

(c) The opinion of Keefe Bruyette & Woods & Partners, L.P. and Sandler O’Neill & Partners L.P. isare included as AnnexAppendix B and Appendix C, respectively, to the proxy statement/prospectus.Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

ITEM 22. UNDERTAKINGS.

(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i)  To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii)  To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

(iii)  To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.

(i)To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii)To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and
(iii)To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

II-3


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(b) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant’s annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fideofferingfide offering thereof.

II-3


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c)

(1) The undersigned registrant undertakes as follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other Items of the applicable form.

(2) The registrant hereby undertakes that every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (1) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fideofferingfide offering thereof.

(d) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(e) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond to requests for information that is incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant to Item 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of this Form, within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration statement through the date of responding to the request.

(f) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in the registration statement when it became effective.

II-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the City of Pittsfield, on this 23rd8th day of November, 2010.April, 2011.

 
 BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.
   

By:

/s/ Michael P. Daly
Michael P. Daly
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated.

 
/s/ Michael P. Daly
Michael P. Daly
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011
/s/ Kevin P. Riley
Kevin P. Riley
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011
/s/ Lawrence A. Bossidy
Lawrence A. Bossidy
Non-Executive Chairman
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011
/s/ Robert M. Curley
Robert M. Curley
Director
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011
/s/ John B. Davies
John B. Davies
Director
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011
/s/ Rodney C. Dimock
Rodney C. Dimock
Director
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011
/s/ Susan M. Hill
Susan M. Hill
Director
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011
/s/ Cornelius D. Mahoney
Cornelius D. Mahoney
Director
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011
/s/ Catherine B. Miller
Catherine B. Miller
Director
 November 23, 2010April 8, 2011


 
 
/s/ David E. Phelps
David E. Phelps
Director
November 23, 2010

/s/ David E. Phelps
David E. Phelps
Director
April 8, 2011
/s/ D. Jeffrey Templeton
D. Jeffrey Templeton
Director
April 8, 2011
/s/ Corydon L. Thurston
Corydon L. Thurston
Director
April 8, 2011
/s/ D. Jeffrey Templeton
D. Jeffrey Templeton
Director
November 23, 2010
/s/ Corydon L. Thurston
Corydon L. Thurston
Director
November 23, 2010


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXHIBIT LIST

 
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
 DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 12,December 21, 2010, by and between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. is included as AnnexAppendix A to the proxy statement/prospectusJoint Proxy Statement/Prospectus included in this registration statement. Certain exhibits have been omitted from the Agreement as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omitted information is considered immaterial from an investor’s perspective. The Registrant will furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit upon request from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 initially filed on March 10, 2000, Registration No. 333-32146.)333-32146).
3.2 Bylaws of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed on February 29, 2008.)2008).
4.1 Form of Stock Certificate of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 initially filed on March 10, 2000, Registration No. 333-32146.)333-32146).
4.2 Terms of common shares of the Registrant found in the Certificate of Incorporation for the Registrant are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.
4.3 No long-term debt instrument issued by the Registrant exceeds 10% of consolidated assets or is registered. In accordance with paragraph 4(iii) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, the Registrant will furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission copies of long-term debt instruments and related agreements upon request.
5.1 Opinion of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick regarding the legality of the securities being registeredregistered.
8.1 FormDraft of Opinionopinion of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick as to tax mattersmatters.
8.2 FormDraft of Opinionopinion of SNR Denton USNutter McClennen & Fish LLP as to tax mattersmatters.
10.1  Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Michael P. Daly (Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits to the Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2009.)2009).
10.2  Amended and restatedRestated Three Year Change in Control Agreement by and among Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Kevin P. Riley (Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits to the Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2009.)2009).
10.3  Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement between Berkshire Bank and Michael P. Daly (Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2009.)2009).
10.4  Amended and Restated Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. 2003 Equity Compensation Plan (Incorporated herein by reference from the Appendix to the Proxy Statement as filed on April 3, 2008.)2008).
10.5  Form of Berkshire Bank Employee Severance Compensation Plan (Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form S-1, Registration Statement and amendments thereto, initially filed on March 10, 2000, Registration No. 333-32146.)333-32146).
10.6  Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. 2001 Stock-Based Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference from the Appendix to the Proxy Statement as filed on December 7, 2000).
10.7  Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock-Based Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement as filed on March 20, 2000 by Woronoco Bancorp, Inc.).
10.8  Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. 2004 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement as filed on March 12, 2001 by Woronoco Bancorp, Inc.).


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
 DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
10.9  Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. 2001 Equity Compensation Plan (Incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement as filed on March 22, 2004 by Woronoco Bancorp, Inc.).
10.10 Factory Point Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated (Incorporated herein by reference from the exhibits to the registration statement on Form S-8 as filed on October 10, 2007, registration No. 333-146604.)333-146604).
10.11 RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference from the exhibits to the registration statement on Form S-8 as filed on October 10, 2007, registration No. 333-146604.)333-146604).
10.12 Factory Point Bancorp, Inc., Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (Incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement as filed on March 22, 2004 by Woronoco Bancorp, Inc.).
10.13 Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. Management Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2010).
10.14 Three year changeYear Change in control agreementControl Agreement by and among Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and David B. Farrell (Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2010).
10.15 Three year changeYear Change in control agreementControl Agreement by and among Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Richard M. Marotta (Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2010).
10.16Three Year Change in Control Agreement by and among Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Patrick J. Sullivan, dated as of December 21, 2010.
10.17Settlement Agreement by and among Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., Legacy Bancorp, Inc., Legacy Banks and Patrick J. Sullivan, dated as of December 21, 2010.
10.18Severance Agreement by and among Berkshire Bank, Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Patrick J. Sullivan, dated as of December 21, 2010.
10.19Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement by and among Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., Legacy Bancorp, Inc., Legacy Banks and J. Williar Dunlaevy, dated as of April 6, 2011.
10.20Non-Competition and Consulting Agreement by and among Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., Berkshire Bank and J. Williar Dunlaevy, dated as of April 6, 2011.
21.1  List of Subsidiaries (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.2010.).
23.1  Consent of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick (contained in Exhibits 5.1 and 8.1).
23.2  Consent of SNR Denton USNutter McClennen & Fish LLP (contained in Exhibit 8.2).
23.3  Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.
23.4  Consent of Crowe Horwarth LLPWolf & Company, P.C.
99.1  Form of proxy card of RomeLegacy Bancorp, Inc.*
99.2  Form of Election Form and Letterproxy card of Transmittal*Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.*
99.3Consent of Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
99.4  Consent of Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.

*To be filed by amendment.supplementally.