As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

Registration No. 333-213307333-            

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Amendment No. 2

to

FORMS-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware 6035 22-3412577

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

975 HOOPER AVENUE, TOMS RIVER, NEW JERSEY 08753110 WEST FRONT STREET, RED BANK, NEW JERSEY 07701

(732)240-4500

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

 

 

Christopher D. Maher

President and Chief Executive Officer

975 Hooper Avenue110 West Front Street

Toms River,Red Bank, New Jersey 0875307701

(732)240-4500

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)

 

 

Copies to:

 

Steven J. Tsimbinos, Esq.

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

975 Hooper Avenue110 West Front Street

Toms River,Red Bank, New Jersey 0875307701

Phone: (732) 240-4500

 

Steven E. BradyDavid J. Hanrahan, Sr.

Ocean Shore Holding Co.

1001 Asbury Avenue

Ocean City,Capital Bank of New Jersey 08226

175 South Main Road

Vineland, New Jersey 08360

Phone: (609) 399-0012(856) 690-1234

David C. Ingles, Esq.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

4 Times Square

New York, New York 10036

Phone: (212)735-3000

 

Aaron M. Kaslow,Edward C. Hogan, Esq.

Kilpatrick TownsendStevens & Stockton LLP

607 14th Street, NW,Lee
Princeton Pike Corporate Center
100 Lennox Drive, Suite 900

Washington, D.C. 20005

200
Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
Phone: (202) 508-5825(609) 243-6434

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective and the conditions to the closing of the merger described herein have been satisfied or waived.

If the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box:  ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act of 1933 registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer ¨  Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨  Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.  ☐

If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

Exchange Act Rule13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer)  ¨

Exchange Act Rule14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer)  ¨

 

 


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

Title of each class of

securities to be registered

 

Amount


to be


registered

 

Proposed


maximum


offering price


per share

 

Proposed


maximum


aggregate


offering price

 

Amount of


registration fee

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

 6,625,3423,208,567 shares(1) N/A $123,727,579.2078,930,760.50(2) $12,459.379,566.41(3)

 

 

(1)

Represents the maximum number of shares of the common stock of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (“OceanFirst”) estimated to be issuable upon completion of the merger (the “merger”) of Masters Merger Sub Corp.,Capital Bank of New Jersey (“Capital Bank”) with and into OceanFirst Bank, National Association, a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst (“Merger Sub”), with and into Ocean Shore Holding Co. (“Ocean Shore”OceanFirst Bank”). This number represents the sum of (a) the product of (i) 0.9667,1.25, the exchange ratio representing the stock portion ofin the merger, consideration, and (ii) 6,492,291,2,566,854, which is the number of shares of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s common stock outstanding as of August 22, 2016December 3, 2018 (including the shares of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s common stock underlying Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s outstanding stock option and restricted stock awards as of August 22, 2016), and (b) the product of (i) 1.2084 and (ii) 289,014, the number of shares of Ocean Shore’s common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of the outstanding Ocean Shore stock options, in each case,December 3, 2018) pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 12, 2016,October 25, 2018, by and among Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, OceanFirst and Merger Sub,OceanFirst Bank (the “merger agreement”), which is attached to the jointenclosed proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex A. The number of shares included in the registration fee table does not include the additional shares that could be issued, upon OceanFirst’s election, to avoid the termination of the merger agreement by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank due to a decrease below certain specified thresholds of the average price of OceanFirst common stock over a specified period of time, pursuant to the merger agreement and described in more detail elsewhere in this jointthe enclosed proxy statement/prospectus. The shares that could be issued in that context cannot be determined at this time.

In If OceanFirst elects to avoid termination of the event thatmerger agreement by increasing the exchange ratio is increased such thatin accordance with the number of shares of common stock of OceanFirst is increased beyond the amount registered pursuant to this Registration Statement, OceanFirst would file prior to consummationterms of the merger agreement, then OceanFirst will file a registration statement pursuant to Rule 462(b) a short-form registration statement provided that the additional amount of shares to be registered is within the limits and conditions provided foror Rule 429 under Rule 462(b). Under Rule 462(b), a registration statement thereto shall become effective upon filing if, among other things: (i) the registration statement is for registering additional securities of the same class as were included in an earlier registration statement for the same offering and declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (ii) the new registration statement registers additional securities in an amount and at a price that together represent no more than 20% of the maximum aggregate offering price set forth for each class of securities in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table contained inAct, as applicable, to reflect such earlier registration statement. Alternatively, if OceanFirst cannot avail itself of the provisions of Rule 462(b), it would pursue registering the additional shares under a new registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 429.increase.

(2)

Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee required by Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and computed pursuant to Rules 457(f) and 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, based upon the market value of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock in accordance with Rules 457(c) and 457(f) under the Securities Act of 1933 as follows: (a) the product of (i) $22.41,$30.75, the average of the high and low prices per share of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global SelectOTC Market Group Inc.’s OTC Pink marketplace (which we refer to as the “OTC Pink”) on August 22, 2016November 19, 2018, the last trading day prior to the initial filing of this Registration Statement on which a trade of Capital Bank common stock was reported on the OTC Pink, and (ii) 6,781,305,2,566,854, the estimated maximum number of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock that may be exchanged for shares of OceanFirst common stock minus (b) $28,241,465.80,in the estimated aggregate amount of cash to be paid by OceanFirst in exchange for shares of Ocean Shore common stock.merger.

(3)

Determined in accordance with Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, at a rate equal to $100.70$121.20 per $1,000,000 of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price. Previously paid.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 


Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This document shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

 

PRELIMINARY — SUBJECT TO COMPLETION — DATED OCTOBER 17, 2016DECEMBER 6, 2018

 

Proxy StatementProspectus  

Prospectus

Proxy Statement

LOGO

LOGO  LOGOLOGO

MERGER AND SHARE ISSUANCE PROPOSED — YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT

Dear Stockholder:

On July 12, 2016,October 25, 2018, OceanFirst Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation (which we refer to as “OceanFirst”), Ocean Shore Holding Co.,OceanFirst Bank, National Association, a New Jersey corporation (which we refer to as “Ocean Shore”), and Masters Merger Sub Corp., a New Jersey corporationnational banking association and a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst (which we refer to as “Merger Sub”“OceanFirst Bank”), and Capital Bank of New Jersey, a New Jersey chartered commercial bank (which we refer to as “Capital Bank”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (which we refer to as the “merger agreement”) that provides for the combinationmerger of OceanFirst Bank and Ocean Shore.Capital Bank. Under the terms of the merger agreement, (i) Merger Sub will merge with and into Ocean Shore (which we refer to as the “first-step merger”), with Ocean Shore continuing as the surviving corporation in the first-step merger and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst, (ii) immediately following the completion of the first-step merger, Ocean Shore will merge with and into OceanFirst (which we refer to as the “second-step merger” and, together with the first-step merger, the “integrated mergers”), with OceanFirst continuing as the surviving corporation in the second-step merger, and (iii) immediately following the completion of the integrated mergers, Ocean City HomeCapital Bank a federal savings bank and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ocean Shore (which we refer to as “Ocean Shore Bank”), will merge with and into OceanFirst Bank, a federal savingswith OceanFirst Bank continuing as the surviving bank and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst (which we refer to as “OceanFirst Bank”), with OceanFirst Bank being the surviving bank (which we refer to as the “bank merger” and, together with the integrated mergers, the “Transactions”).OceanFirst.

At the effective time of the first-step merger, each outstanding share of the common stock par value $0.01 per share, of Ocean Shore (which we refer to as “Ocean Shore common stock”),Capital Bank, except for specified shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock owned by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank, OceanFirst or OceanFirst,stockholders who have properly exercised dissenters’ rights, will be converted into the right to receive $4.35 in cash, without interest (which we refer to as the “cash consideration”), and 0.96671.25 shares (such number being referred to as the “exchange ratio” and such shares being referred to as “stock consideration”) of the common stock par value $0.01 per share, of OceanFirst, (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst common stock”), together with cash in lieu of the fractional shares. The cash consideration andshares, if any, each such Capital Bank stockholder would have otherwise been entitled to receive in the stock consideration are collectively referred to as the “merger consideration.”

merger.

Although the number of shares of OceanFirst common stock that holders of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore stockholders”) will be entitled to receive is fixed, the market value of such shares (and, therefore, the stock considerationmerger consideration) will fluctuate with the market price of OceanFirst common stock and will not be known at the time Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders vote on the first-step merger. However, Ocean Shore hasas described in more detail elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus, under the terms of the merger agreement, if the average of the daily closing prices of OceanFirst common stock over a specified period of time close to the expected closing date of the merger decreases below certain specified thresholds, Capital Bank would have a right to terminate the merger agreement, if, at any time during a five-day period followingunless OceanFirst elects to increase the date of receipt of the requisite regulatory approvals for the Transactions, the market value1.25 share exchange ratio, which would result in additional shares of OceanFirst common stock (i) is less than $14.46 and (ii) fails to meet certain comparison thresholds relative to the NASDAQ Bank Index. If Ocean Shore elects to exercise this termination right, then OceanFirst has the option to override the proposed termination by increasing the exchange ratio to a level that would cause either of the two requirements of this termination right to not be satisfied.being issued. Based on the $18.74$25.06 closing price of OceanFirst common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (which we refer to as the “NASDAQ”) on July 12, 2016,October 25, 2018, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the Transactions, the per share value of the stock consideration was equal to $18.12 andmerger, the per share value of the merger consideration was equal to $22.47.$31.33. Based on the $19.16$[●] closing price of OceanFirst common stock on the NASDAQ on October 14, 2016,[●], 2018, the latest practicable trading day before the printing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the per share value of the merger consideration was equal to $22.87 (and the aggregate value of the merger consideration was equal to approximately $148.9 million), which includes the value of the stock portion of the merger consideration and the cash portion of the merger consideration.$[●]. Based on the 0.96671.25 exchange ratio and the number of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock outstanding as of September 23, 2016[●], 2018 (which includes the number of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock underlying Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s stock option and restricted stock awards as of September 23, 2016)[●], 2018), the maximum number of shares of OceanFirst common stock estimated to be issuable at the effective time of the first-step merger is 6,294,189.[●].We urge you to obtain current market quotations for OceanFirst (trading symbol “OCFC”) and Ocean Shore (tradingCapital Bank (OTC Pink symbol “OSHC”“CANJ”).


OceanFirstCapital Bank will hold a special meeting of its stockholders (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst special meeting”) in connection with the issuance of the shares of OceanFirst common stock representing the stock consideration (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst share issuance”). At the OceanFirst special meeting, the holders of OceanFirst common stock (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst stockholders”) will be asked to vote to approve the OceanFirst share issuance. Approval of the OceanFirst share issuance requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by the OceanFirst stockholders at the OceanFirst special meeting.

Ocean Shore will hold a special meeting of its stockholders (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore special meeting”) in connection with the first-step merger. At the Ocean Shore special meeting, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders will be asked to vote to approve the merger agreement, the merger and a related mattersmatter as described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Under the New Jersey lawBanking Act and Ocean Shore’s organizational documents,the National Bank Act, approval of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of a majoritythe holders of at leasttwo-thirds of the votes cast by Ocean Shore stockholderscommon stock of Capital Bank entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

Capital Bank stockholders are or may be entitled to assert dissenters’ rights with respect to the merger under Section 215a of the National Bank Act (which we refer to as “12 U.S.C. § 215a”). Any stockholder who wishes to exercise dissenters’ rights must strictly comply with the procedures set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 215a, a copy of which is included asAnnex B to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus. A description of these procedures is included in the section entitled “The Merger — Dissenters’ Rights” in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.

The OceanFirst special meeting willis scheduled to be held on November 22, 2016[●], 2019 at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey, 08753,the Luciano Conference Center, Cumberland County College, at 5:30 p.m. local time. The Ocean Shore special meeting will be held on November 22, 2016 at The Flanders Hotel, 719 East 11th Street, Ocean City, NJ 08226, at 8:30 a.m.[●] local time.

The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board of directors unanimously recommends that Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders vote “FOR” the approval of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the first-step merger, and “FOR” the other mattersproposal to be considered at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

The OceanFirst board of directors unanimously recommends that OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuance and “FOR” the other matter to be considered at the OceanFirst special meeting.

This joint proxy statement/prospectus describes the Ocean Shore special meeting, the OceanFirst special meeting, the Transactions, the OceanFirst share issuance,merger, the documents related to the Transactionsmerger and other related matters.Please carefully read this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including “Risk Factors,” beginning on page 27[●], for a discussion of the risks relating to the proposed merger and the OceanFirst share issuance.merger. You also can obtain information about OceanFirst and Ocean Shore from documents that eachit has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

LOGO

LOGO

Christopher D. Maher

President and Chief Executive Officer

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

  

Steven E. BradyDavid J. Hanrahan

President and Chief Executive Officer

Ocean Shore Holding Co.Capital Bank of New Jersey

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in the first-step merger or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The securities to be issued in the first-step merger are not savings or deposit accounts or other obligations of any bank ornon-bank subsidiary of either OceanFirst or Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, and they are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency.

The date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus is [●], 2018 and it is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to the stockholders of OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank on or about [●], 2016.2018.


LOGOLOGO

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the Stockholders of OceanFirst:our Stockholders:

OceanFirst will hold the OceanFirstA special meeting of the stockholders of Capital Bank of New Jersey, or Capital Bank, is scheduled to be held at 5:30 p.m.[●] local time, on November 22, 2016,[●], 2019, at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey, 08753the Luciano Conference Center, Cumberland County College to consider and vote upon the following matters:proposals:

 

a proposal to approve the issuance of shares of OceanFirst common stock in connection with the first-step merger (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst share issuance proposal”); and
1.

A proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 25, 2018, by and among OceanFirst Financial Corp., OceanFirst Bank, National Association, and Capital Bank, and the merger contemplated by that agreement pursuant to which Capital Bank will merge with and into OceanFirst Bank, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus (we refer to proposal 1 as the “merger proposal”); and

 

a proposal to adjourn the OceanFirst special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the OceanFirst share issuance proposal (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst adjournment proposal”).
2.

A proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the merger proposal (we refer to proposal 2 as the “adjournment proposal”).

We have fixed the close of business on September 27, 2016[●], 2018 as the record date for the OceanFirst special meeting (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst record date”).meeting. Only OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders of record as of the OceanFirstthis record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the OceanFirst special meeting, or any adjournment of the OceanFirst special meeting. ApprovalUnder the New Jersey Banking Act and the National Bank Act, approval of the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by the holders of OceanFirstat leasttwo-thirds of the common stock of Capital Bank entitled to vote at the OceanFirst special meeting. The OceanFirst adjournment proposal will be approved if the holders of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of OceanFirst common stockshares represented at the OceanFirst special meeting, are votedprovided a quorum is present, vote in favor of the OceanFirst adjournmentsuch proposal.

The OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders are or may be entitled to assert dissenters’ rights with respect to the merger described above under 12 U.S.C. § 215a. Any stockholder who wishes to exercise dissenters’ rights must strictly comply with the procedures set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 215a, a copy of which is included asAnnex B to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus. A description of these procedures is included in the section entitled “The Merger — Dissenters’ Rights” in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.

Our board of directors has unanimously approved the mergerAgreement and Plan of Merger, has determined that such agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,by such agreement, including the integrated mergersmerger of Capital Bank with and into OceanFirst Bank, are advisable and in the OceanFirst share issuance,best interests of Capital Bank and its stockholders, and unanimously recommends that OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal and “FOR” the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

Your vote is very important. We cannot complete the integrated mergersmerger described above unless the OceanFirst stockholdersholders of at leasttwo-thirds of our outstanding shares of common stock approve the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal.

Regardless of whether you plan to attend the OceanFirst special meeting, please vote as soon as possible. If you hold stock in your name as a stockholder of record of OceanFirst, please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid return envelope. If you hold your stock in “street name” through a bank or broker, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished by the record holder.

This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides a detailed description of the OceanFirst special meeting, the Transactions, the OceanFirst share issuance, the documents related to the Transactions and other related matters. We urge you to read this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including any documents incorporated in the joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference, and its annexes carefully and in their entirety.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

LOGO

Christopher D. Maher

President and Chief Executive Officer


LOGO

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the Stockholders of Ocean Shore:

Ocean Shore will hold the Ocean Shore special meeting at 8:30 a.m. local time, on November 22, 2016, at The Flanders Hotel, 719 East 11th Street, Ocean City, NJ 08226 to consider and vote upon the following matters:

a proposal to approve the merger agreement and the first-step merger, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Ocean Shore, as more fully described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore merger proposal”);

a proposal to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation that certain executive officers of Ocean Shore may receive in connection with the first-step merger pursuant to existing agreements or arrangements with Ocean Shore (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal”); and

a proposal to adjourn the Ocean Shore special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Ocean Shore merger proposal (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore adjournment proposal”).

We have fixed the close of business on September 23, 2016, as the record date for the Ocean Shore special meeting (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore record date”). Only Ocean Shore stockholders of record as of the Ocean Shore record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Ocean Shore special meeting, or any adjournment of the Ocean Shore special meeting. Under New Jersey law and Ocean Shore’s organizational documents, approval of the Ocean Shore merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by Ocean Shore stockholders entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting. The Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on such proposal at the Ocean Shore special meeting are voted in favor of such proposal. The Ocean Shore adjournment proposal will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on such proposal at the Ocean Shore special meeting are voted in favor of such proposal.

The Ocean Shore board of directors has unanimously approved the merger agreement, has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the first-step merger, are advisable and in the best interests of Ocean Shore and its stockholders, and unanimously recommends that Ocean Shore stockholders vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger proposal, “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal and “FOR” the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal.

Your vote is very important. We cannot complete the integrated mergers unless the Ocean Shore stockholders approve the Ocean Shore merger proposal.

Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Ocean Shore special meeting, please vote as soon as possible. If you hold stock in your name as a stockholder of record of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid return envelope. You may also vote through the Internet. If you hold your stock in “street name” through a bank or broker, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished by the record holder.

This jointThe accompanying proxy statement/prospectus provides a detailed description of the Ocean Shore special meeting, the Transactions,merger of Capital Bank with and into OceanFirst Bank, the documents related to the Transactionsmerger and other related matters. We urge you to read the joint proxy statement/prospectus, including any documents incorporated in the joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference, and its annexes carefully and in their entirety.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

LOGO

Steven E. BradyDavid J. Hanrahan

President and Chief Executive Officer

Capital Bank of New Jersey


REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about OceanFirst and Ocean Shore from documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (which we refer to as the “SEC”) that are not included in or delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You can obtain any of the documents filed with or furnished to the SEC by OceanFirst and/or Ocean Shore at no cost from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also request copies of these documents, including documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, at no cost by contacting the appropriate companyOceanFirst at the following address:

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

975 Hooper Avenue

Toms River, New Jersey 08753

(732) 240-4500

Ocean Shore Holding Co.

1001 Asbury Avenue

Ocean City, New Jersey 08226

(609) 399-0012

110 West Front Street

Red Bank, New Jersey 07701

(732)240-4500

You will not be charged for any of these documents that you request. To obtain timely delivery of these documents, you must request them no later than five business days before the date of yourthe special meeting. This means that OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders requesting documents must do so by November 15, 2016,[], 2019, in order to receive them before the OceanFirst special meeting, and Ocean Shore stockholders requesting documents must do so by November 15, 2016, in order to receive them before the Ocean Shore special meeting.

You should rely only on the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this document. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this document. This document is dated [●], 2016,2018, and you should assume that the information in this document is accurate only as of such date. You should assume that the information incorporated by reference into this document is accurate as of the date of such document, and neither the mailing of this document to Ocean Shore stockholders or OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders nor the issuance by OceanFirst of shares of OceanFirst common stock in connection with the first-step merger will create any implication to the contrary.

This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. Except where the context otherwise indicates, information contained in this document regarding Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has been provided by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and information contained in this document regarding OceanFirst has been provided by OceanFirst.

See “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140[●] for more details.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Page

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

   1 

SUMMARY

   107 

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF OCEANFIRST

   20

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF OCEAN SHORE

22

SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

24

UNAUDITED COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA

2614 

RISK FACTORS

   2717 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

   3423 

THE OCEAN SHORECAPITAL BANK SPECIAL MEETING

   3524 

Date, Time and Place of the Ocean Shore Special Meeting

   3524 

Matters to Be Considered

   3524 

Recommendation of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Board

   3524 

Ocean Shore Record Date and Quorum

   3524 

Required Vote; Treatment of Abstentions, BrokerNon-Votes and Failure to Vote

   3624 

Shares Held by Officers Directors and Certain StockholdersDirectors

   3625 

Voting of Proxies; Incomplete Proxies

   3625 

Shares Held in “Street Name”

   3726 

Revocability of Proxies and Changes to an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank Stockholder’s Vote

   3726 

Solicitation of Proxies

   3726 

Attending the Ocean Shore Special Meeting

   38

Delivery of Proxy Materials to Ocean Shore Stockholders Sharing an Address

3827 

Assistance

   3827 

OCEAN SHORECAPITAL BANK PROPOSALS

   3928 

Proposal No. 1 Ocean Shore— The Merger Proposal

   3928 

Proposal No. 2 Ocean Shore Merger-Related Compensation Proposal

39

Proposal No. 3 Ocean Shore— The Adjournment Proposal

   39

THE OCEANFIRST SPECIAL MEETING

41

Date, Time and Place of the OceanFirst Special Meeting

41

Matters to Be Considered

41

Recommendation of the OceanFirst Board

41

OceanFirst Record Date and Quorum

41

Required Vote; Treatment of Abstentions, Broker Non-Votes and Failure to Vote

42

i


Page

Shares Held by Officers, Directors and Certain Stockholders

42

Voting of Proxies; Incomplete Proxies

42

Shares Held in “Street Name”

43

Revocability of Proxies and Changes to an OceanFirst Stockholder’s Vote

43

Solicitation of Proxies

43

Attending the OceanFirst Special Meeting

43

Delivery of Proxy Materials to OceanFirst Stockholders Sharing an Address

44

Assistance

44

OCEANFIRST PROPOSALS

45

Proposal No. 1 OceanFirst Share Issuance Proposal

45

Proposal No. 2 OceanFirst Adjournment Proposal

4528 

INFORMATION ABOUT OCEANFIRST AND OCEANFIRST BANK

   4629 

INFORMATION ABOUT MERGER SUBCAPITAL BANK

   47

INFORMATION ABOUT OCEAN SHORE

4830 

THE TRANSACTIONSMERGER

31

Structure of the Merger

31

Background of the Merger

31

Capital Bank’s Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Capital Bank Board

35

Opinion of Boenning  & Scattergood, Inc., Capital Bank’s Financial Advisor

37

OceanFirst’s Reasons for the Merger

   49 

StructureInterests of Capital Bank’s Directors and Executive Officers in the TransactionsMerger

   4950 

Background of the Transactions

49

Ocean Shore’s Reasons for the Transactions; Recommendation of the Ocean Shore Board

54

Opinion of Ocean Shore’s Financial Advisor

57

OceanFirst’s Reasons for the Transactions; Recommendation of the OceanFirst Board

73

Opinion of OceanFirst’s Financial Advisor

75

Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information of Ocean Shore

83

Interests of Ocean Shore’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Transactions

85

Public Trading Markets

   9153 

Dividend Policy

   9253 

No Dissenters’ Rights

   9253 

Regulatory Approvals Required for the TransactionsMerger

   9254 

i


Litigation Related to the Transactions

93

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

   9556

Structure of the Merger

56

Merger Consideration

56

Fractional Shares

56

Governing Documents; Directors and Officers

56

Dissenters’ Rights

56

Treatment of Capital Bank Restricted Stock and Stock Option Awards

57

Closing and Effective Time

57

Conversion of Shares; Exchange of Certificates

57

Representations and Warranties

58

Covenants and Agreements

61

Capital Bank Stockholder Meeting and Recommendation of the Board of Directors of Capital Bank

66

Agreement Not to Solicit Other Offers

67

Conditions to Complete the Merger

69

Termination of the Merger Agreement

69

Effect of Termination

71

Termination Fee

71

Expenses and Fees

72

Amendment, Waiver and Extension of the Merger Agreement

72

Capital Bank Voting and Support Agreements

72 

ACCOUNTING TREATMENT

   11273 

U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE INTEGRATED MERGERS

   11374 

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF OCEANFIRST

   11677 

Authorized Capital Stock

   11677 

Common Stock

   11677 

Preferred Stock

   11778 

ii


Page

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   11880 

COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDERS’ RIGHTS

   12685 

COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS

   13397 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT OF OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK

   134

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT OF OCEAN SHORE

13699 

LEGAL MATTERS

   138101 

EXPERTS

   138101 

OceanFirst

   138101 

Ocean ShoreSun

   138

Cape

138

DEADLINES FOR SUBMITTING STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

139

OceanFirst

139

Ocean Shore

139101 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

   140102

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1 

ii


ANNEXES

 

Annexes

A.

Annex A — Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 25, 2018, by and among OceanFirst Financial Corp., OceanFirst Bank, National Association, and Capital Bank of New Jersey

   A-1 

B.

Annex B — Form of Voting Agreement with Ocean Shore DirectorsStatutory Provisions Relating to Dissenters’ Rights

   B-1 

C.

Annex C — OpinionForm of Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.Voting and Support Agreement with Capital Bank Directors

   C-1 

D.

Annex D — Opinion of Piper JaffrayBoenning & Co.Scattergood, Inc.

   D-1 

 

iii


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following are some questions that you, as an OceanFirst stockholder or an Ocean Shore stockholder,a holder of Capital Bank common stock (which we refer to as a “Capital Bank stockholder”), may have about the Transactions, the OceanFirst share issuance, the OceanFirst special meetingmerger or the Ocean Shore special meeting as applicable, and brief answers to those questions. We urge you to read carefully the remainderall of this joint proxy statement/prospectus because the information in this section does not provide all of the information that might be important to you with respect to the Transactions, the OceanFirst share issuance, the OceanFirst special meetingmerger or the Ocean Shore special meeting, as applicable.meeting. For details about where you can find additional important information, please see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[].

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to “OceanFirst” refer to OceanFirst Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries, and references to “Ocean Shore”“Capital Bank” refer to Ocean Shore Holding Co.,Capital Bank of New Jersey, a New Jersey corporation,chartered commercial bank, and its subsidiaries.

Q: What areis the Transactions?Merger?

A: OceanFirst, Ocean ShoreOceanFirst Bank and Merger SubCapital Bank entered into the merger agreement on July 12, 2016. The first-step merger isOctober 25, 2018, which provides for the first step in a seriesstrategic acquisition of transactions to combineCapital Bank by OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, and their respective subsidiary banks, OceanFirst Bank and Ocean City Home Bank (which we refer to as “Ocean Shore Bank”).Bank.

Under the terms of the merger agreement:

Merger Subagreement, Capital Bank will merge with and into Ocean Shore,OceanFirst Bank, with Ocean ShoreOceanFirst Bank continuing as the surviving corporationbank in suchthe merger and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst (which we refer to as the “first-step merger”“merger”).

Immediately following the completion of the first-step merger, Ocean Shore, as the surviving corporation in the first-step merger, will merge with and into OceanFirst, with OceanFirst being the surviving corporation (which we refer to as the “second-step merger” and, together with the first-step merger, the “integrated mergers”).

Immediately following the completion of the integrated mergers, Ocean Shore Bank will merge with and into OceanFirst Bank, with OceanFirst Bank being the surviving bank (which we refer to as the “bank merger,” and together with the integrated mergers, the “Transactions”).

A copy of the merger agreement is included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex A.

The integrated mergersmerger cannot be completed unless, among other things:

Thethings, the holders of the common stock, par value $5.00 per share, of Capital Bank (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst stockholders”“Capital Bank common stock”) approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by that agreement, including the merger, by an affirmative vote of the holders of at leasttwo-thirds of the common stock of Capital Bank entitled to vote at the special meeting.

The completion of the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of additional customary conditions, which are discussed in the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Conditions to Complete the Merger” beginning on page [●].

Q: Why am I receiving this proxy statement/prospectus?

A: We are delivering this document to you because it is a proxy statement being used by the Capital Bank board of directors (which we refer to as the “Capital Bank board”) to solicit proxies from the stockholders of Capital Bank in connection with approval of the merger and a related matter.

In order to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, Capital Bank has called a special meeting of the Capital Bank stockholders (which we refer to as the “special meeting”). This document also serves as a notice of the special meeting and describes the proposals to be presented at the special meeting.

In addition, this document is also a prospectus of OceanFirst that is being delivered to Capital Bank stockholders because OceanFirst is offering shares of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of OceanFirst (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst common stock”) approve the issuance of the shares of OceanFirst common stock in connection with the first-step merger (which we refer to Capital Bank stockholders as the “OceanFirst share issuance”).

The holders (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore stockholders”) of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Ocean Shore (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore common stock”) approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the first-step merger (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore merger proposal”).

The completion of the integrated mergers is subject to the fulfillment of additional customary conditions, which are discussedconsideration in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Conditions to Complete the Integrated Mergers” beginning on page 108.

Q: Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus?

A: We are delivering this document to you because it is a joint proxy statement being used by both the OceanFirst board of directors (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst board”) and the Ocean Shore board of

directors (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore board”) to solicit proxies of the stockholders of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, as applicable, in connection with approval of the OceanFirst share issuance and the first-step merger, as applicable, and related matters.

In order to approve the OceanFirst share issuance, OceanFirst has called a special meeting of the OceanFirst stockholders (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst special meeting”). In order to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the first-step merger, Ocean Shore has called a special meeting of the Ocean Shore stockholders (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore special meeting”). This document also serves as a notice of the OceanFirst special meeting and the Ocean Shore special meeting, and describes the proposals to be presented at each special meeting.

In addition, this document is also a prospectus that is being delivered to Ocean Shore stockholders because OceanFirst is offering shares of OceanFirst common stock to Ocean Shore stockholders in connection with the first-step merger.

This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains important information about the Transactions.merger. This document also contains important information about the proposals being voted on at the OceanFirst special meeting and the Ocean Shore special meeting, respectively.meeting. You should read this document carefully and in its entirety. The enclosed materials allow you to have your shares voted by proxy without attending yourthe special meeting.Your vote is important. We encourage you to submit your proxy as soon as possible.

Q: In addition to the OceanFirst share issuance,approval of the merger agreement and the merger, what else are OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders being asked to vote on at the OceanFirst special meeting?

A: In addition to voting on the OceanFirst share issuanceproposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst share issuance“merger proposal”), OceanFirstCapital Bank is soliciting proxies from the OceanFirstits stockholders with respect to a proposal to adjourn the OceanFirst special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the OceanFirst share issuance proposal (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst adjournment proposal”). Completion of the integrated mergers is not conditioned upon approval of the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

Q: In addition to the approval of the merger agreement and the first-step merger, what else are Ocean Shore stockholders being asked to vote on at the Ocean Shore special meeting?

A: In addition to voting on the Ocean Shore merger proposal, Ocean Shore is soliciting proxies from the Ocean Shore stockholders with respect to a proposal to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation that certain executive officers of Ocean Shore may receive in connection with the first-step merger pursuant to agreements or arrangements with Ocean Shore (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal”) and a proposal to adjourn the Ocean Shore special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Ocean Shore merger proposal (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore adjournment“adjournment proposal”). Completion of the integrated mergersmerger is not conditioned upon approval of the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal or the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal.

Q: What will Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders be entitled to receive in the first-step merger?

A: If the first-step merger is completed, each outstanding share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, except for certain shares of Ocean Shore common stock owned by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank, OceanFirst or OceanFirst,stockholders who have properly exercised dissenters’ rights, will be converted into the right to receive $4.35 in cash, without interest, and 0.96671.25 shares of OceanFirst common stock.stock (such number being referred to as the “exchange ratio” and such shares being referred to as the “merger consideration”), together with cash in lieu of fractional shares. OceanFirst will not issue any fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock in the first-step merger. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share of OceanFirst common stock upon the completion of the first-step merger will instead be entitled to receive an amount in cash (rounded to the nearest cent) based on the volume-weighted average closing-saletrading price (which we refer to as “VWAP”) per share of OceanFirst common stock for the five full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the day on which the first-step merger is completed.

Q: What will OceanFirst stockholders be entitled to receive in the first-step merger?

A: OceanFirst stockholders will not be entitled to receive any merger consideration and will continue to hold the shares of OceanFirst common stock that they held immediately prior to the completion of the first-step merger.

Q: How will the first-step merger affect Ocean Shore equityCapital Bank’s restricted stock and stock option awards?

A: The Ocean Shore equityCapital Bank’s restricted stock and stock option awards will be affected as follows:

Restricted Stock Awards: At the effective time of the first-step merger (which we refer to as the “effective time”), each outstanding restricted stock award granted by Ocean Shorein respect of shares of Capital Bank common stock will become fully vestedvest and the restrictions on those restricted stock awards will lapse, and each holder of such restricted stock awardsaward will be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration forin respect of the cancellation of each share of Ocean Shore common stock held by such holder.

Stock Options: Also at the effective time, all outstanding and unexercised options to purchase Ocean Shore common stock will fully vest and will convert into options to purchase a number of shares of OceanFirst common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) determined by multiplying (i) the number of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock subject to such Ocean ShoreCapital Bank restricted stock option immediately prior toaward no later than ten business days after the effective time.

Stock Options: At the effective time, by (ii) 1.2084;each outstanding and the exercise price per share of the newunexercised option (whether vested or unvested) to purchase Capital Bank common stock will be cancelled and exchanged for a payment in cash (without interest) equal to the quotient obtained by dividingproduct of (a) the per shareaggregate number of shares of Capital Bank common stock issuable upon exercise of the option and (b) the excess, if any, of (i) the product of the exchange ratio and the VWAP of OceanFirst’s common stock on the NASDAQ for the five full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the closing date over (ii) theper-share exercise price forof such stock option. The cash payment is payable as soon as practicable after the shares of Ocean Shore common stock subject to such Ocean Shore option by (b) 1.2084 (rounded up to the nearest whole cent).effective time.

Q: Will the value of the merger consideration change between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the time that the first-step merger is completed?

A: Yes. AlthoughBecause the exchange ratio is fixed, the value of the stock portion of the merger consideration will fluctuate between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the closing date because the market value for OceanFirst common stock fluctuates. The cash consideration is fixed.will fluctuate.

Q: How does the OceanFirstCapital Bank board recommend that I vote at the OceanFirst special meeting?

A: The OceanFirstCapital Bank board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal and “FOR” the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

Q: How doesWhen and where is the Ocean Shore board recommend that I vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting?

A: The Ocean Shore board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger proposal, “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal and “FOR” the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal.

Q: When and where are the meetings?

A: The OceanFirst special meeting willis scheduled to be held at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753the Luciano Conference Center, Cumberland County College on November 22, 2016,[●], 2019, at 5:30 p.m. local time.

The Ocean Shore special meeting will be held at The Flanders Hotel, 719 East 11th Street, Ocean City, NJ 08226 on November 22, 2016, at 8:30 a.m.[●] local time.

Q: What do I need to do now?

A: After you have carefully read this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus and have decided how you wish to vote your shares, please vote your shares promptly so that your shares are represented and voted at yourthe special meeting. If you hold your shares in your name as a stockholder of record, you must complete, sign, date and mail your proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid return envelope as soon as possible. Alternatively, Ocean Shore stockholdersyou may vote through the Internet.Internet prior to midnight on January [●], 2019. Information and applicable deadlines for voting Ocean Shore shares

through the Internet are set forth in the enclosed Ocean Shore proxy card instructions. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a bank or broker, you must direct your bank or broker how to vote in accordance with the instructions you have received from your bank or broker. “Street name” stockholders who wish to vote in person at theirthe special meeting will need to obtain a legal proxy from the institution that holds their shares.

Q: What constitutes a quorum for the OceanFirst special meeting?

A: The presence at the OceanFirst special meeting, in person or by proxy, of holders representing at leastof a majority of the outstanding shares of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock entitled to be voted at the OceanFirst special meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the OceanFirst special meeting. Once a share is represented for any purpose at the OceanFirst special meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the OceanFirst special meeting or for any adjournment(s) thereof.adjournment of the special meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes, if any, will be included in determining the number of shares present at the meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Q: What constitutes a quorum for the Ocean Shore special meeting?

A: The presence at the Ocean Shore special meeting, in person or by proxy, of holders representing at least a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Ocean Shore common stock entitled to be voted at the Ocean Shore special meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Ocean Shore special meeting. Once a share is represented for any purpose at the Ocean Shore special meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the Ocean Shore special meeting or for any adjournment(s) thereof. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be included in determining the number of shares present at the meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Q: What is the vote required to approve each proposal at the OceanFirst special meeting?

A:OceanFirst share issuance proposal: The merger proposal:

 

  

Standard:Standard: Approval of the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by the holders of OceanFirstat leasttwo-thirds of the common stock of Capital Bank entitled to vote at the OceanFirst special meeting.

 

  

Effect of abstentions and brokernon-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal, it will have nothe same effect onas a vote AGAINST the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal.

OceanFirstThe adjournment proposal:proposal:

 

  

Standard:Standard: The OceanFirst adjournment proposal will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by the holders of OceanFirst common stockrepresented at the OceanFirst special meeting are voted in favor of the OceanFirst adjournmentsuch proposal.

 

  

Effect of abstentions and brokernon-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting, orif you fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the OceanFirst adjournment proposal (and your bank or brokers shares are included in determining the number of shares present at the meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum), it will have nothe same effect onas a vote AGAINST the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

Q: What is the vote required to approve each proposal at the Ocean Shore special meeting?

A:Ocean Shore merger proposal:

Standard: Approval of the Ocean Shore merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by Ocean Shore stockholders entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the Ocean Shore merger proposal, it will have no effect on the Ocean Shore merger proposal.

Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal:

Standard: Approval of the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by Ocean Shore stockholders entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal, it will have no effect on the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal.

Ocean Shore adjournment proposal:

Standard: Approval of the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by Ocean Shore stockholders entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal, it will have no effect on the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal.

Q: Why is my vote important?

A: If you do not vote, it will be more difficult for OceanFirst or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank to obtain the necessary quorum to hold their respectivethe special meetings.meeting. If you are an OceanFirsta Capital Bank stockholder, your failure to submit a proxy or vote in person, or failure to

instruct your bank or broker how to vote, or abstention with respect to the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal will noteffectively be counted as a vote cast and will have no effect onagainst the approval of such proposal, even though such approval is a condition to the completion of the integrated mergers. If you are an Ocean Shore stockholder, your failure to submit a proxy or vote in person, or failure to instruct your bank or broker how to vote, or abstention with respect to the Ocean Shoremerger proposal. The merger proposal will not be counted as a vote cast and will have no effect on the approval of such proposal, even though such approval is a condition to the completion of the integrated mergers. The OceanFirst share issuance must be approved by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the total votes cast by the OceanFirst stockholders at the OceanFirst special meeting. The merger agreement must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by the holders of Ocean Shoreat leasttwo-thirds of the common stock of Capital Bank entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting. The OceanFirstCapital Bank board unanimously recommends that the OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal and the Ocean Shore board unanimously recommends that the Ocean Shore stockholders vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore mergeradjournment proposal.

Q: If my shares of common stock are held in “street name” by my bank or broker, will my bank or broker automatically vote my shares for me?

A: No. Your bank or broker cannot vote your shares without instructions from you. You should instruct your bank or broker how to vote your shares in accordance with the instructions provided to you. Please check the voting form used by your bank or broker.

Q: If I am a participant in Ocean Shore’s ESOP or Ocean Shore’s 401(k) Plan, how will shares owned through such plans be voted?

A: If you participate in the Ocean Shore Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore ESOP”) or if you hold shares of Ocean Shore common stock through the Ocean Shore Bank Savings and

Investment Plan (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore 401(k) Plan”), you will receive a voting instruction card for each plan that reflects all shares you may direct the trustees to vote on your behalf under the plans. Under the terms of the Ocean Shore ESOP, the Ocean Shore ESOP trustee votes all allocated shares of Ocean Shore common stock held by the Ocean Shore ESOP as directed by the plan participants. The Ocean Shore ESOP trustee, subject to the exercise of its fiduciary duties, will vote all unallocated shares of Ocean Shore common stock held by the Ocean Shore ESOP and allocated shares for which no voting instructions are received in the same proportion as shares for which it has received timely voting instructions.

Under the terms of the Ocean Shore 401(k) Plan, a participant is entitled to direct the trustee how to vote the shares of Ocean Shore common stock held in the Ocean Shore Holding Co. Stock Fund and credited to his or her Ocean Shore 401(k) Plan account. The trustee will vote all shares for which no directions are given or for which instructions were not timely received in the same proportion as shares for which the trustee received voting instructions.

The deadline for returning your voting instructions to each plan’s trustee is November 15, 2016.

Q: If I am a participant in OceanFirst’s ESOP, OceanFirst’s 401(k) Plan or Cape Bancorp’s 401(k) Plan, how will shares owned through such plans be voted?

A: If you participate in the OceanFirst Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan or the OceanFirst Bank Matching Contribution Employee Stock Ownership Plan (which we collectively refer to as the “OceanFirst ESOP”), or the OceanFirst Bank Retirement Plan (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst 401(k) Plan”) or the Cape Bank Employees’ Savings & Profit Sharing Plan (which we refer to as the “Cape 401(k) Plan”), which was maintained by Cape Bancorp, Inc. (which we refer to as “Cape”) prior to May 2, 2016, the date on which OceanFirst completed its acquisition of Cape (which we refer to as the “Cape acquisition”), you will receive a voting instruction form for each plan that reflects all shares that you may vote under the particular plan. Under the terms of the OceanFirst ESOP, the OceanFirst ESOP trustee votes all shares held by the OceanFirst ESOP, but each OceanFirst ESOP participant may direct the trustee how to vote the shares of OceanFirst common stock allocated to his or her account. The OceanFirst ESOP trustee, subject to the exercise of its fiduciary responsibilities, will vote all unallocated shares of OceanFirst common stock held by the OceanFirst ESOP and allocated shares for which no voting instructions are received in the same proportion as shares for which it has received timely voting instructions.

Under the terms of the OceanFirst 401(k) Plan and under the terms of the Cape 401(k) Plan, a participant is entitled to provide instructions for all shares credited to his or her OceanFirst 401(k) Plan or Cape 401(k) Plan account. The trustee will vote all shares for which no directions are given or for which timely instructions were not received in the same proportion as shares for which voting instructions were timely received.

The deadline for returning your voting instructions is November 15, 2016.

Q: Can I attend the special meeting and vote my shares in person?

A: Yes. All Capital Bank stockholders, of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, including stockholders of record and stockholders who hold their shares “in street name” through banks, brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, are invited to attend their respective meetings.the Capital Bank meeting. Holders of record of OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock can vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting and Ocean Shore special meeting, respectively.meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the record holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, to be able to vote in person at yourthe special meeting. If you plan to attend yourthe special meeting, you must hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from the record holder of your shares confirming your ownership. In addition, you must bring a form of personal photo identification with you in order to be admitted. OceanFirst and Ocean Shore reserve the right to refuse admittance to anyone without proper proof of share ownership or without proper photo identification. The use of cameras, sound recording equipment, communications devices or any similar equipment during the special meetingsmeeting is prohibited without OceanFirst’s or Ocean Shore’s express written consent, respectively.prohibited.

Q: Can I change my vote?

A:OceanFirst stockholders: Yes. If you are a holder of record of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock, you may change your vote or revoke any proxy at any time before it is voted by (i) signing and returning a proxy card with a later date, (ii) delivering a written revocation letter to OceanFirst’s corporate secretary or (iii) attending the OceanFirst special meeting in person, notifying the corporate secretary and voting by ballot at the OceanFirst special meeting. Attendance at the OceanFirst special meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy. A revocation or later-dated proxy received by OceanFirst after the vote will not affect the vote. OceanFirst’s corporate secretary’s mailing address is: Corporate Secretary, OceanFirst Financial Corp., 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753.

Ocean Shore stockholders: Yes. If you are a holder of record of Ocean Shore common stock, you may change your vote or revoke any proxy at any time before it is voted by (i) signing and returning a proxy with a later date, (ii) delivering a written revocation letter to Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s corporate secretary, (iii) attending the Ocean Shore special meeting in person notifyingand delivering to the corporate secretary of Capital Bank a written notice of your intention to vote in person and voting by ballot at the Ocean Shore special meeting or (iv) voting through the Internet at a later time.prior to midnight on January [●], 2019. Attendance at the Ocean Shore special meeting by itself will not automatically revoke your proxy. A revocation or later-dated proxy received by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank after the vote will not affect the vote. Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s corporate secretary’s mailing address is: Corporate Secretary, Ocean Shore Holding Co., 1001 Asbury Ave., Ocean City,Capital Bank of New Jersey, 08226.175 South Main Road, Vineland, New Jersey 08360.

If you hold your shares of OceanFirst common stock or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock in “street name” through a bank or broker, you should contact your bank or broker to change your vote or revoke your proxy.

Q: Will OceanFirst be required to submit the OceanFirst share issuance proposal to its stockholders even if the OceanFirst board has withdrawn, modified or qualified its recommendation?

A: Yes. Unless the merger agreement is terminated before the OceanFirst special meeting, OceanFirst is required to submit the OceanFirst share issuance proposal to its stockholders even if the OceanFirst board has withdrawn, modified or qualified its recommendation.

Q: Will Ocean Shore be required to submit the Ocean Shore merger proposal to its stockholders even if the Ocean Shore board has withdrawn, modified or qualified its recommendation?

A: Yes. Unless the merger agreement is terminated before the Ocean Shore special meeting, Ocean Shore is required to submit the Ocean Shore merger proposal to its stockholders even if the Ocean Shore board has withdrawn, modified or qualified its recommendation.

Q: What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the integrated mergersmerger to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders?

A: The obligations of Ocean ShoreOceanFirst and OceanFirstCapital Bank intend for the merger to complete the integrated mergers are subject to, among other customary closing conditions described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the receipt by each of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst of the opinion of its counsel to the effect that the integrated mergers together will be treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesqualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (which we refer to as the “Code”). AssumingAs a condition to the respective obligations of OceanFirst and Capital Bank to each complete the merger transactions, OceanFirst shall receive an opinion from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (which we refer to as “Skadden”) and Capital Bank shall receive an opinion from Stevens & Lee, each to the effect that the integrated mergersmerger will qualify as a reorganization Ocean Shore stockholders generally will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount not to exceedwithin the cash portionmeaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Neither OceanFirst nor Capital Bank currently intends to waive these conditions. Assuming the merger considerationqualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

You should readpurposes, a U.S. holder (as defined in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Integrated Mergers”Consequences” beginning on page 113 for a more complete discussion[●]) of Capital Bank common stock generally will not recognize gain or loss, except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock.

For further information, see the section entitled “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” beginning on page [●].

The U.S. federal income tax consequences described above may not apply to all holders of Capital Bank common stock. Your tax consequences will depend on your specific situation. Accordingly, we strongly urge you to consult your tax advisor for a full understanding of the integrated mergers. Tax matters can be complicated and theparticular tax consequences of the integrated mergersmerger to you will depend on your particular tax situation. You should consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of the integrated mergers to you.

Q: Are Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders entitled to dissenters’ rights?

A: No. Ocean ShoreYes. Capital Bank stockholders are not entitled to exercise dissenters’ rights in connection with the Transactions. For further information, seemerger, which means that a dissenting stockholder is entitled to receive the value of his, her or its shares in cash (which may be more or less than the value of the consideration that such holder would receive in the merger), as determined by a committee, if the dissenting stockholder does not vote in favor of the merger and complies with all of the other requirements set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 215a; provided that the merger is completed. You should read carefully the detailed description of the requirements to exercise dissenters’ rights in “The TransactionsMerger No Dissenters’ Rights” beginning on page 92.[●], as well as the full text of 12 U.S.C. § 215a, which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex B.

In addition, it is a condition to OceanFirst’s obligation to complete the merger that the holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Capital Bank common stock exercise dissenters’ rights.

Q: If I am an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder, should I send in my Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stock certificates now?

A: No. Please do not send in your Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stock certificates with your proxy. Promptly following the completion of the first-step merger, an exchange agent will send you instructions for exchanging Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stock certificates for the merger consideration. See “The Merger Agreement — Conversion of Shares; Exchange of Certificates” beginning on page 97.[●].

Q: What should I do if I hold my shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock in book-entry form?

A: You are not required to take any special additional actions if your shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock are held in book-entry form. Promptly following the completion of the first-step merger, shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock held in book-entry form automatically will be exchanged for shares of OceanFirst common stock in book-entry form and cash to be paid in exchange for fractional shares, if any.

Q: What happens if the merger is not completed?

A: If the merger is not completed, Capital Bank stockholders will not receive any consideration for their shares in connection with the merger. Instead, Capital Bank will remain an independent company and its common stock will continue to be traded on the OTC Market Group Inc.’s OTC Pink marketplace (which we refer to as the “OTC Pink”) under the symbol “CANJ.” In addition, if the merger agreement is terminated in certain circumstances, Capital Bank may be required to pay OceanFirst a termination fee. For a more detailed discussion of the circumstances under which a payment of the termination fee will be required to be paid, please see the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Termination Fee” beginning on page [●].

Q: What happens if I sell my shares of Capital Bank common stock after the record date but before the special meeting?

A: The record date of the special meeting is earlier than the date of the special meeting and the date that the merger is expected to be completed. If you sell or otherwise transfer your shares after the record date for the special meeting but before the date of the special meeting, you will retain your right to vote at the special

meeting, but you will not have the right to receive the merger consideration to be received by stockholders of Capital Bank in the merger. In order to receive the merger consideration, a Capital Bank stockholder must hold his, her or its shares through completion of the merger and comply with the transmittal procedures discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.

Q: Whom may I contact if I cannot locate my Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stock certificate(s)?

A: If you are unable to locate your original Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stock certificate(s), prior to closing, you should contact ComputerShare Investor, Ocean Shore’sPhiladelphia Stock Transfer, Capital Bank’s transfer agent, at (800) 368-5948.866-223-0448, or info@philadelphiastocktransfer.com.

Q: What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials?

A: OceanFirst stockholders and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold shares of OceanFirst and/or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold such shares. If you are a holder of record of OceanFirst common stock or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. In addition, if you are a holder of both OceanFirst common stock and Ocean Shore common stock, you will receive one or more separate proxy cards or voting instruction cards for each company. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive or otherwise follow the voting instructions set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to ensure that you vote every share of OceanFirst common stock and/or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock that you own.

Q: When do you expect to complete the Transactions?merger?

A: OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank currently expect to complete the Transactions late in the fourth quarter of 2016 or earlymerger in the first quarter of 2017.2019. However, neither OceanFirst nor Ocean ShoreCapital Bank can assure you of when, or if, the Transactionsmerger will be completed. The completion of the integrated mergersmerger is subject to the fulfillmentsatisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including the approval by the OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders of the OceanFirst share issuance proposal, the approval by the Ocean Shore stockholders of the Ocean Shore merger proposal and the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals.

Q: What happens if the first-step merger is not completed?

A: If the first-step merger is not completed, Ocean Shore stockholders will not receive any consideration for their shares in connection with the first-step merger. Instead, Ocean Shore will remain an independent public company and its common stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (which we refer to as the “NASDAQ”). In addition, if the merger agreement is terminated in certain circumstances, a termination fee may be required to be paid by either OceanFirst or Ocean Shore. For a more detailed discussion of the circumstances under which such payments will be required to be paid, please see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Termination Fee” beginning on page 110.

Q: Whom should I call with questions?

A: OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders: If you who have any questions concerning the Transactionsmerger or this joint proxy statement/prospectus, would like additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting yourtheir shares of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock, pleaseshould contact Investor Relations at (732) 240-4500 or OceanFirst’sCapital Bank’s proxy solicitor, GeorgesonLaurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC, at (866) 296-5716.(516) 396-7939.

Ocean Shore stockholders: If you have any questions concerning the Transactions or this joint proxy statement/prospectus, would like additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting your shares of Ocean Shore common stock, please contact Ocean Shore’s proxy solicitor, Regan & Associates, Inc, at (800) 737-3246.

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information from this joint proxy statement/prospectus. It may not contain all of the information that is important to you. We urge you to read carefully the entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the annexes, and the other documents to which we refer in order to fully understand the Transactions.merger. See “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[]. Each item in this summary refers to the page of this joint proxy statement/prospectus on which that subject is discussed in more detail.

In the First-Step Merger, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Stockholders will be Entitled to Receive the Merger Consideration (page 95)[])

OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank are proposing a strategic merger. If the first-step merger is completed, each outstanding share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, except for certain shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock owned by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank, OceanFirst or OceanFirst,stockholders who have properly exercised dissenters’ rights, will be converted into the right to receive $4.35 in cash, without interest, and 0.96671.25 shares of OceanFirst.OceanFirst common stock. OceanFirst will not issue any fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock in the first-step merger. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fraction of a share of OceanFirst common stock upon the completion of the first-step merger will instead be entitled to receive an amount in cash, rounded to the nearest cent, determined by multiplying the fraction of a share (rounded to the nearest thousandth when expressed as a decimal form) of OceanFirst common stock to which the holder would otherwise be entitled by the average closing-sale priceVWAP per share of OceanFirst common stock on the NASDAQ (as reported byThe Wall Street Journal) for the five full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the day on whichclosing date of the first-step merger is completed.merger.

OceanFirst common stock is listed on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OCFC” and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock is listedtraded on the NASDAQOTC Pink under the symbol “OSHC.“CANJ.” The following table shows the closing sale prices of OceanFirst common stock as reported on the NASDAQ, and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock as reported on the NASDAQOTC Pink, on July 12, 2016,October 25, 2018, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the Transactions,merger, and on October 14, 2016[●], 2018, the latest practicable trading day before the printing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This table also shows the implied value of the merger consideration payable for each share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, which was calculated by first multiplying the closing price of OceanFirst common stock on those dates by the exchange ratio of 0.9667, and then adding $4.35, representing the per share cash consideration.1.25.

 

   OceanFirst
Common Stock
   Ocean Shore
Common Stock
   Implied Value of
Merger
Consideration
 

July 12, 2016

  $18.74    $16.96    $22.47  

October 14, 2016

  $19.16    $22.55    $22.87  
   OceanFirst
Common Stock
   Capital Bank
Common Stock
   Implied Value of
Merger Consideration
 

October 25, 2018

  $25.06   $24.65   $31.33 

[●], 2018

  $[●]   $[●]   $[●] 

The merger agreement governs the integrated mergers.merger. The merger agreement is included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex A. All descriptions in this summary and elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus of the terms and conditions of the integrated mergersmerger are qualified by reference to the merger agreement. Please read the merger agreement carefully for a more complete understanding of the integrated mergers.merger.

The OceanFirstCapital Bank Board Unanimously Recommends that OceanFirstCapital Bank Stockholders Vote “FOR” the OceanFirst Share IssuanceMerger Proposal and the OceanFirst Adjournment Proposal Presented at the OceanFirst Special Meeting (page 41)[])

The OceanFirst board has unanimously approved the merger agreement. The OceanFirst board unanimously recommends that OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuance proposal and “FOR” the OceanFirst adjournment proposal presented at the OceanFirst special meeting. For the factors considered by the



OceanFirst board in reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Transactions — OceanFirst’s Reasons for the Transactions; Recommendation of the OceanFirst Board” beginning on page 73.

The Ocean Shore Board Unanimously Recommends that Ocean Shore Stockholders Vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore Merger Proposal and the Other Proposals Presented at the Ocean Shore Special Meeting (page 35)

The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the first-step merger, are advisable and in the best interests of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and its stockholders and has unanimously approved the merger agreement.agreement and the merger. The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board unanimously recommends that Ocean Shore stockholders vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger proposal and “FOR” the other proposalsadjournment proposal presented at the Ocean Shore special meeting. For the factors considered by the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board in reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the merger, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The TransactionsMerger — Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Reasons for the Transactions;Merger; Recommendation of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Board” beginning on page 54.[●].



Each of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s directors, solely in his or her capacity as an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder, has entered into a separate voting and support agreement with OceanFirst, pursuant to which each such director has, among other things, (a) agreed to vote in favor of the Ocean Shore merger proposal and certain related matters and against alternative transactions.transactions and (b) waived any applicable dissenters’ rights. A form of these voting and support agreements is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex BC. For more information regarding the voting and support agreements, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Ocean Shore Voting and Support Agreements” beginning on page 111.[●].

Opinion of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Financial Advisor (page 57[] andAnnex CD)

On July 12, 2016, Sandler O’NeillOctober 25, 2018, Boenning & Partners, L.P.Scattergood Inc. (which we refer to as “Sandler O’Neill”“Boenning”) rendered its written opinion to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board that, as of the date of the opinion, and based upon and subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitation set forth in the opinion, the merger consideration in the first-step merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders. The full text of the Sandler O’Neill written opinion, which sets forth the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached to this document asAnnex C. Ocean Shore stockholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety. Sandler O’Neill’s opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion and was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed on, and the information made available to Sandler O’Neill as of, the date of Sandler O’Neill’s opinion. The Sandler O’Neill written opinion is addressed to the Ocean Shore board, is directed only to the fairness of the merger consideration to Ocean Shore’s stockholders from a financial point of view, and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any Ocean Shore stockholder should vote with respect to the Ocean Shore merger proposal, the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal, or any other proposals presented at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

Opinion of OceanFirst’s Financial Advisor (page 75 andAnnex D)

On July 12, 2016, Piper Jaffray & Co. (which we refer to as “Piper”) rendered its written opinion to the OceanFirst board that, as of the date of the opinion, and based upon and subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations set forth in the opinion, the merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to OceanFirst. The full text of the PiperBoenning written opinion, which sets forth the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached to this document asAnnex D. OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety. Piper’sBoenning’s opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion and was



necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed on, and the information made available to PiperBoenning as of the date of Piper’sBoenning’s opinion. The PiperBoenning written opinion is addressed to the OceanFirstCapital Bank board, is directed only to the fairness of the merger consideration to Capital Bank’s stockholders from a financial point of view, and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any holder of OceanFirst common stockCapital Bank stockholder should vote with respect to the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal or any other matter.proposals presented at the special meeting.

What Holders of Ocean Shore Equity-BasedCapital Bank Restricted Stock and Stock Option Awards will be Entitled to Receive (page 85)[])

The Ocean Shore equityCapital Bank restricted stock and stock option awards will be affected as follows:

Restricted Stock Awards: At the effective time, each restricted stock award granted by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will become fully vestedvest and eachthe restrictions on those restricted stock awards will lapse. Each holder of suchCapital Bank restricted stock awardsaward will be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration forin respect of the cancellation of each share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock held by such holder.subject to a Capital Bank restricted stock award no later than 10 business days after the effective time.

Stock Options: Also at the effective time, alleach outstanding and unexercised optionsoption (whether vested or unvested) to purchase Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock will fully vestbe cancelled and will convert into optionsexchanged for a payment in cash (without interest) equal to purchase athe product of (a) the aggregate number of shares of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock (rounded down toissuable upon exercise of the nearest whole share) determined by multiplyingoption and (b) the excess, if any, of (i) the numberproduct of sharesthe exchange ratio and the VWAP of Ocean ShoreOceanFirst’s common stock subject toon NASDAQ for the five full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the closing date of the merger over (ii) theper-share exercise price of such Ocean Shore stock option, immediately prior towhich will be payable as soon as practicable after the effective time by (ii) 1.2084; and the exercise price per share of the new option will be equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (a) the per share exercise price for the shares of Ocean Shore common stock subject to such Ocean Shore option by (b) 1.2084 (rounded up to the nearest whole cent).time.

OceanFirst Will Hold the OceanFirstThe Special Meeting is Scheduled to be Held on November 22, 2016[], 2019 (page 41)[])

The OceanFirst special meeting willis scheduled to be held on November 22, 2016,[●], 2019, at 5:30 p.m.[●] local time, at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753.the Luciano Conference Center, Cumberland County College. At the OceanFirst special meeting, OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders will be asked to approve the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal and approve the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

Only holders of record of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock at the close of business on September 27, 2016[●], 2018 (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst record“record date”), will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the OceanFirst special meeting. Subject to the ten percent voting limitation set forth in OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation, eachEach share of OceanFirst Capital Bank



common stock is entitled to one vote on each proposal to be considered at the OceanFirst special meeting. As of the OceanFirst record date, there were 25,850,956[●] shares of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock entitled to vote at the OceanFirst special meeting.

As of the OceanFirst record date, the directors and executive officers of OceanFirstCapital Bank and their affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote approximately 1,097,243[●] shares of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock representing approximately 4.2%[●]% of the shares of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock outstanding on that date.

ApprovalEach of Capital Bank’s directors, solely in his or her capacity as a Capital Bank stockholder, has entered into a separate voting and support agreement with OceanFirst, pursuant to which such director has, among other things, (a) agreed to vote in favor of the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal and certain related matters and against alternative transactions and (b) waived any applicable dissenters’ right. Capital Bank’s directors beneficially owned and were entitled to vote approximately [●] shares of Capital Bank common stock representing approximately [●]% of the shares of Capital Bank common stock outstanding on that date.

Under the New Jersey Banking Act (which we refer to as the “NJ Banking Act”) and the National Bank Act, as amended, 12 U.S.C. §1,et seq. (which we refer to as the “National Bank Act”), approval of the merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majoritythe holders of at leasttwo-thirds of the total votes cast by the OceanFirst stockholderscapital stock of Capital Bank entitled to vote at the OceanFirst special meeting. If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal, it will have nothe same effect onas a vote against the OceanFirst share issuancemerger proposal.

The OceanFirst adjournment proposal will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by the holders of OceanFirst common stockrepresented at the OceanFirst special meeting are voted in favor of such proposal.proposal at the special meeting. If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting orif you fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the OceanFirst adjournment proposal (and your bank or broker’s shares are included in determining the number of shares present at the meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum), it will have nothe same effect onas a vote AGAINST the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.



Ocean Shore Will Hold the Ocean Shore Special Meeting on November 22, 2016 (page 35)

The Ocean Shore special meeting will be held on November 22, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. local time, at The Flanders Hotel, 719 East 11th Street, Ocean City, NJ 08226. At the Ocean Shore special meeting, Ocean Shore stockholders will be asked to approve the Ocean Shore merger proposal, the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal and the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal.

Only holders of record of Ocean Shore common stock at the close of business on September 23, 2016 (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore record date”), will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Ocean Shore special meeting. Subject to the ten percent voting limitation set forth in Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation, each share of Ocean Shore common stock is entitled to one vote on each proposal to be considered at the Ocean Shore special meeting. As of the Ocean Shore record date, there were 6,511,006 shares of Ocean Shore common stock entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

As of the Ocean Shore record date, the directors and executive officers of Ocean Shore and their affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote approximately 609,013 shares of Ocean Shore common stock representing approximately 9.4% of the shares of Ocean Shore common stock outstanding on that date.

Each of Ocean Shore’s directors, solely in his or her capacity as an Ocean Shore stockholder, has entered into a separate voting agreement with OceanFirst, pursuant to which each such Ocean Shore director has agreed to vote in favor of the Ocean Shore merger proposal.

Under New Jersey law and Ocean Shore’s organizational documents, approval of the Ocean Shore merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by Ocean Shore stockholders entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting. If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the Ocean Shore merger proposal, it will have no effect on the Ocean Shore merger proposal.

The Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal and the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal will each be approved if a majority of the votes cast on each such proposal at the Ocean Shore special meeting are voted in favor of each such proposal at the Ocean Shore special meeting. If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to either such proposal, it will have no effect on the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal or the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of(page [])

OceanFirst and Capital Bank intend for the Integrated Mergers (page 113)

The obligations of Ocean Shore and OceanFirstmerger to complete the integrated mergers are subject to, among other customary closing conditions described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the receipt by each of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst of the opinion of its counsel to the effect that the integrated mergers together will be treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesqualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. AssumingAs a condition to the respective obligations of OceanFirst and Capital Bank to complete the merger, OceanFirst shall receive an opinion from Skadden and Capital Bank shall receive an opinion from Stevens & Lee, each to the effect that the integrated mergersmerger will qualify as a reorganization Ocean Shore stockholders generally will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount not to exceedwithin the cash portionmeaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Neither OceanFirst nor Capital Bank currently intends to waive these conditions. Assuming the merger considerationqualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.purposes, a U.S. holder of Capital Bank common stock generally will not recognize gain or loss, except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock.

You should read the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Integrated Mergers” beginning on page 113 for a more complete discussion of theThe U.S. federal income tax consequences described above may not apply to all holders of Capital Bank common stock. Your tax consequences will depend on your specific situation. Accordingly, we strongly urge you to consult your tax advisor for a full understanding of the integrated mergers. Tax matters can be complicated and theparticular tax consequences of the integrated mergersmerger to you will depend on your particular tax situation. You should consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of the integrated mergers to you.



Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Directors and Officers Have Financial Interests in the TransactionsMerger that May Differ from Your Interests (page 85)[])

In considering the recommendation of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board to adopt the merger agreement, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders should be aware that officers and directors of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank have employment and other



compensation agreements or plans that give them interests in the Transactionsmerger that are different from, or in addition to, their interests as Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders. The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board was aware of these circumstances at the time it approved the merger agreement.agreement and the merger. These interests include:

 

The awards of stock options that Ocean Shore has made to certain executive officers and directors under its equity incentive plan. As a result of the first-step merger, each stock option, whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to closing will fully vest and be converted into an option to acquire a number of shares of OceanFirst common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) determined by multiplying (i) the number of shares of Ocean Shore common stock subject to such Ocean Shore option immediately prior to the effective time by (ii) 1.2084; and the exercise per share of the new option (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) will be equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the per share exercise price for the shares of Ocean Shore common stock subject to such Ocean Shore stock option by (ii) 1.2084;

The awards of restricted stock that Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has made to certain of its executive officers and directors under its equity incentive plans. As a resultdirectors. At the effective time, each unvested share of the first-step merger, each restricted stock award that is outstanding immediately prior to closing will fully vest and the restrictions on those restricted stock awards will lapse, and each holder of restricted stock will be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration in exchange for each sharethe cancellation of Ocean Shore common stock held by such holder;shares; and

 

The employment agreementagreements of Steven E. Brady, Presidenteach of Mr. Hanrahan, Mr. Lobosco and Chief Executive OfficerMr. Rehm, as recently amended, that, subject to each of Ocean Shore, thatMr. Hanrahan, Mr. Lobosco and Mr. Rehm, respectively, signing a release on or after the closing date, provides for a cash severance payment and continued health, life and disability insurance coverage benefits in the event of a termination of employment without cause or for good reason within two years following a change in control;

Change in control agreements for certain Ocean Shore executive officers, including Janet M. Bossi, Executive Vice President, Lending, Kim M. Davidson, Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary, Donald F. Morgenweck, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Anthony J. Rizzotte, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer and Paul Esposito, Senior Vice President of Operations that provide for cash severance payments and continued health and welfare insurance coverage in the event of a termination of employment without cause or for good reason within one year following a change in control;

The supplemental executive retirement plan maintained by Ocean Shore that provides Mr. Brady with a benefit if a change in control occurs;

The separation and consulting agreement into which Mr. Brady is anticipated to enter with OceanFirst providing for payments and benefits payment to be made in full satisfactioneach of Mr. Brady’s rights under his employment agreement in connection with his termination thereunder following the first-step mergerthem and setting forth the terms of his consulting arrangement with,a retention and his role as a director of, OceanFirstnon-compete payment to Messrs. Hanrahan and OceanFirstRehm.

Capital Bank following the first-step merger.

The agreements into which Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson are anticipated to enter with OceanFirst providing for certain payments in lieu of the cash severance under their change in control agreements and setting forth their new positions at OceanFirst following the effective time of the first-step merger;

The salary continuation agreements that Ocean Shore maintains with Mr. Brady, Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson pursuant to which, following a change in control, they will be entitled to the normal retirement benefit under such agreements even if their employment terminates prior to their normal retirement ages;



The split dollar life insurance agreements that Ocean Shore maintains with Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson that will remain in effect, unless mutually terminated, if Ms. Bossi or Ms. Davidson terminates employment other than for cause following a change in control;

The director and executive officer life insurance plan maintained by Ocean Shore that provides executive officers with enhanced death benefits in the event of death following a termination of employment other than for cause within two years following a change in control;

That Mr. Brady and two other directors are expected to be appointed as a member of the OceanFirst board and the OceanFirst Bank boards; and

OceanFirst’s agreement to create an advisory board consisting of Mr. Brady and each member of the Ocean Shore board who has not been appointed to the OceanFirst board.

Ocean Shore Stockholders Are NOT Entitled to Assert Dissenters’ Rights (page 92)[])

UnderIf the New Jersey Business Corporation Act (which we refermerger is completed, Capital Bank stockholders have the right under 12 U.S.C. § 215a to asdissent from the “NJBCA”),merger and obtain an appraisal of the holdersfair value of Ocean Shoretheir shares of Capital Bank common stock will not have any dissenters’ rights with respectmade by a committee of three persons selected pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 215a. Once an appraisal is fixed, dissenting Capital Bank stockholders may receive cash equal to the Transactions. For further information, seeappraised fair value of their Capital Bank common stock (which may be more or less than the value of the consideration that such holder would receive in the merger) instead of receiving the merger consideration if the merger is completed. A stockholder electing to dissent from the merger must strictly comply with all procedures required under 12 U.S.C. § 215a. The procedures are summarized in “The TransactionsMerger No Dissenters’ Rights” beginning on page 92.[●], and a copy of the relevant statutory provisions of 12 U.S.C. § 215a regarding dissenters’ rights is included asAnnex B.

It is a condition to OceanFirst’s obligation to complete the merger that the holders of no more than 10% of the shares of Capital Bank common stock exercise their rights under 12 U.S.C. § 215a to dissent from the merger. See “The Merger Agreement — Conditions to Complete of the Merger” beginning on page [●].

Completion of the Transactions;Merger; Conditions That Must Be Fulfilled For The Integrated MergersMerger To Occur (page 108)[])

Currently, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst expect to complete the Transactions late in the fourth quarter of 2016 or earlymerger in the first quarter of 2017.2019. As more fully described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the merger agreement, the completion of the integrated mergersmerger depends on a number of customary closing conditions being satisfied or, where legally permissible, waived. These conditions include:

 

approval of the merger agreement by the Ocean Shore stockholders and approvalrequisite vote of the issuance of shares of OceanFirst common stock in connection with the first-step merger by the OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders;

 

authorization for listing on the NASDAQ of the shares of OceanFirst common stock to be issued in the first-step merger;merger, subject to official notice of issuance;

 

the receipt of required regulatory approvals, including the approval (or waiver of such approval requirement) of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (which we refer to as the “Federal Reserve Board”) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (which we refer to as the “OCC”);, and the expiration of all statutory waiting periods in respect of such approvals;

 

effectiveness of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part;

 

the absence of any order, injunction or other legal restraint preventing the completion of the integrated mergersmerger or making the completion of the integrated mergersmerger illegal;

 

subject to the materiality standards provided in the merger agreement, the accuracy of the representations and warranties of OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank in the merger agreement;



performance in all material respects by each of OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank of its obligations under the merger agreement; and

 

receipt by each of OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank of an opinion from its counsel as to certain tax matters.

In addition, OceanFirst’s obligation to complete the merger is also subject to the following conditions:

receipt by OceanFirst of a certificate stating that Capital Bank is not and has not been during a specified period, a “United States real property holding corporation”;

the absence of a materially burdensome regulatory condition; and

the holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Capital Bank common stock exercise their rights under 12 U.S.C. § 215a to dissent from the merger.

Neither Ocean ShoreCapital Bank nor OceanFirst can be certain when, or if, the conditions to the integrated mergersmerger will be satisfied or waived, or that the integrated mergersmerger will be completed.



Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 109)[])

The merger agreement can be terminated at any time prior to completion of the first-step merger in the following circumstances:

 

by mutual written consent, if the OceanFirst board of directors (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst board”) and the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board so determine;

 

by the OceanFirst board or the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board if (i) any governmental entity that must grant a requisite regulatory approval denies any requisite regulatory approval in connection with the Transactionsmerger and such denial has become final and nonappealable, or (ii) any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has issued a final and nonappealable order prohibiting or making illegal the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or (iii) an application for a requisite regulatory approval has been withdrawn at the request of the applicable government entity, unless, in the case of clause (iii) the approval of that government entity is no longer necessary to consummate the merger or the applicable party intends to file a new application within 30 days of the withdrawal, unless, in the case of clauses (i), (ii) and (iii), the failure to obtain a requisite regulatory approval is due to the failure of the terminating party to perform or observe its obligations under the merger agreement;

 

by the OceanFirst board or the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board if the integrated mergers havemerger has not been consummated on or before the one year anniversary of the date of the merger agreementAugust 31, 2019 (which we refer to as the “termination date”), unless the failure of the integrated mergersmerger to be consummated by such date is due to the failure of the terminating party to perform or observe its obligations under the merger agreement;

 

by the OceanFirst board or the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board (except that the terminating party cannot then be in material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in the merger agreement) if the other party breaches any of its obligations or any of its representations and warranties set forth in the merger agreement (or any such representation or warranty ceases to be true), which breach or breaches, either individually or in the aggregate would constitute, if occurring or continuing on the closing date, the failure of a closing condition of the terminating party, and such breach is not or cannot be cured within 45 days following written notice to the party committing such breach or(or such breach cannot be cured during such period;

by the Ocean Shore board,fewer days as remain prior to the time that the OceanFirst share issuance proposal is approved, if the OceanFirst board (i) fails to recommend in this joint proxy statement/prospectus that the OceanFirst stockholders approve the OceanFirst share issuance, or takes certain adverse actions with respect to such recommendation, or (ii) breaches certain obligations, including with respect to calling a meeting of its stockholders and recommending that they approve the OceanFirst share issuance, in any material respect;termination date);

 

by the OceanFirst board, prior to the time that the Ocean Shore merger proposal is approved by the Capital Bank stockholders, if the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board (i) fails to recommend in this joint proxy statement/prospectus that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders approve the merger agreement, or takes certain adverse actions with respect to such recommendation, (ii) fails to recommend against acceptance of a tender offer or exchange offer for outstanding Ocean Shore common stock that has been publicly disclosed (other than by OceanFirst or an affiliate of OceanFirst) within ten



respect to such recommendation, (ii) fails to recommend against acceptance of a publicly-disclosed tender offer or exchange offer for outstanding Capital Bank common stock (other than by OceanFirst or an affiliate of OceanFirst) within 10 business days after the commencement of such tender or exchange offer, (iii) recommends or endorses an acquisition proposal, (iv) breaches certain obligations with respect to acquisition proposals in any material respect or (v) materially breaches any of its obligations with respect to calling a meeting of its stockholders and recommending that they approve the merger agreement;

by Capital Bank, following the Capital Bank stockholders meeting if Capital Bank (i) receives an acquisition proposal or (iv) breaches certainprior to such meeting, (ii) does not breach any of its obligations including with respect to acquisition proposals or calling a meeting of its stockholders and recommending that they approve the merger agreement in any material respect; orand (iii) fails to obtain the required vote of its stockholders at the special meeting; and

 

by Ocean Shore,Capital Bank if, the market valueaverage closing price of OceanFirst common stock on the determination date (as defined in the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement —Termination of the Merger Agreement”) is less than $14.46$20.04 and OceanFirst common stock underperforms an index of financial institutions by more than a specified15% threshold calculated pursuant to a prescribed formula set forth in the merger agreement and described in more detail in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Termination of the Merger Agreement” beginning on page 109.[●].



Termination Fee (page 110)[])

If the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, including but not limited to circumstances involving alternative acquisition proposals with respect to Ocean Shore,Capital Bank and changes in the recommendation of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board, or changes in the recommendation of the OceanFirst board, Ocean Shore or OceanFirst, as applicable,Capital Bank may be required to pay to the other partyOceanFirst a termination fee equal to $5.72$3.2 million (which we refer to as the “termination fee”). The termination fee could discourage other companies from seeking to acquire or merge with Ocean Shore or OceanFirst.Capital Bank.

Regulatory Approvals Required for the Integrated Mergers and the Bank Merger (page 92)[])

Subject to the terms of the merger agreement, both Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst have agreed to cooperate with each other and use their reasonable best efforts to obtain all regulatory approvals or waivers necessary or advisable to complete the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. These include approvalsagreement, which includes an approval or waiverswaiver from, among others, the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC. OceanFirst and Ocean Shore have submitted a waiver request to the Federal Reserve Board on August 26, 2016 (which we refer to as the “FRB waiver request”) and an application to the OCC on August 18, 2016 (which we refer to as the “OCC application”). AsNovember 9, 2018, for approval of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus,merger. OCC approval has not yet been granted. OCC approval (if granted) for the FRB waiver request has been granted,merger: (i) would reflect only its view that the transaction does not contravene applicable competitive standards imposed by law and is consistent with regulatory policies relating to safety and soundness; (ii) would not be an OCC opinion that the merger is financially favorable to the stockholders or that the OCC application remains outstanding.has considered the adequacy of the terms of the transaction; and (iii) would not be an endorsement of, or recommendation for, the merger. Although neither Ocean ShoreCapital Bank nor OceanFirst knows of any reason why the OCC application should not be approvedit cannot obtain these regulatory approvals or waivers in a timely manner, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst cannot be certain when, or if, the OCC applicationthey will be approved.obtained.

The Rights of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Stockholders Will Change as a Result of the First-Step Merger (page 126)[])

OceanFirst is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank is incorporatedchartered under the banking laws of the State of New Jersey. Accordingly, Delaware corporate law governs the rights of OceanFirst stockholders and New Jersey lawthe NJ Banking Act governs the Ocean Shorerights of Capital Bank stockholders. As a result of the first-step merger, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders will become stockholders of OceanFirst. Thus, following the completion of the first-step



merger, the rights of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders who become OceanFirst stockholders in the first-step merger will be governed by the corporate law of the State of Delaware and will also then be governed by OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws, rather than by the corporate lawlaws of the State of New Jersey and Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

See the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Comparison of Stockholders’ Rights” on page [●] for a description of the material differences in stockholders’ rights under the laws of the State of Delaware, the laws of the State of New Jersey and each of the OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank governing documents.

Information About the Companies (page 46)[])

OceanFirst and OceanFirst Bank

OceanFirst is incorporated under Delaware law and serves as the holding company for OceanFirst Bank. OceanFirst Bank, founded in 1902, is a community$7.6 billion regional bank with $4.0 billion in assetsoperating throughout New Jersey, metropolitan Philadelphia and 50 branches located throughout Central and Southernmetropolitan New Jersey.York City. OceanFirst Bank delivers commercial and residential financing solutions, wealth management and deposit services throughout the central New Jersey region and is one of the largest and oldest community-based financial institutioninstitutions headquartered in Ocean County, New Jersey. OceanFirst’s website is www.oceanfirstonline.com.

OceanFirst common stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OCFC.”

OceanFirst’s principal executive office is located at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River,110 West Front Street, Red Bank, New Jersey 0875307701 and its telephone number at that location is (732)240-4500. OceanFirst’s website is www.oceanfirst.com. Additional information about OceanFirst and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[●].



Merger SubCapital Bank

Merger SubCapital Bank is a New Jersey corporationstate chartered commercial bank that opened for business in 2007. Capital Bank offers an array of personal and commercial banking products, including savings and checking accounts, certificates of deposit, and business and consumer loans. As of September 30, 2018, Capital Bank had $495.3 million in total assets, $446.2 million in deposits and $46.1 million of stockholders’ equity. Capital Bank has five locations in New Jersey — two in Vineland (Cumberland County), one in Woodbury Heights (Gloucester County), one in Hammonton (Atlantic County), and a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst. Merger Sub was formed by OceanFirst for the sole purpose of consummating the integrated mergers. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Information About Merger Sub” beginning on page 47.loan production office in Marlton (Burlington County).

Ocean Shore

Ocean Shore is the holding company for Ocean Shore Bank. Founded in 1887, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank operates 11 branch offices throughout Cape May and Atlantic Counties in New Jersey. Ocean Shore Bank places a strong emphasis on obtaining deposits by offering checking account products and services for consumers, businesses, municipalities and local boards of education. Additionally, Ocean Shore Bank provides savings accounts designed to fit any need. Ocean Shore Bank also provides a full menu of residential, consumer and commercial lending options. The goal at Ocean Shore Bank is to develop a strong relationship with customers by continually offering innovative products and services that will fill all their financial needs. Ocean Shore is headquartered in Ocean City, New Jersey. Ocean Shore’s website is www.ochome.com/home.

Ocean Shore common stock is traded on the NASDAQOTC Pink under the symbol “OSHC.“CANJ.

Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s principal executive offices are located at 1001 Asbury Avenue, Ocean City,175 South Main Road, Vineland, New Jersey 0822608360 and its telephone number at that location is (609) 399-0012. Additional information about Ocean Shore and its subsidiaries(856)690-1234. Capital Bank’s website is included in documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.www.cbnj.bank.

Litigation Related to the Transactions (page 93)

On July 22, 2016, Robert Strougo, a purported Ocean Shore stockholder, filed a putative class action lawsuit in the Superior Court for the State of New Jersey, Cape May County (which we refer to as the “Court”), against Ocean Shore, the members of the Ocean Shore board and OceanFirst on behalf of all Ocean Shore public stockholders. The lawsuit generally alleges that the members of the Ocean Shore board breached their fiduciary duties by approving the merger agreement because the Transactions are procedurally flawed and financially inadequate, certain terms in the merger agreement are preclusive and unfair, and certain members of the Ocean Shore board are conflicted. Plaintiff further alleges that OceanFirst aided and abetted such breaches. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the merger, as well as unspecified money damages, costs and attorney’s fees and expenses. On September 7, 2016, plaintiff filed an amended complaint bringing disclosure claims alleging that OceanFirst’s registration statement on Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part (which we refer to as the “Registration Statement”), omitted certain material information. Although the defendants believe that they have meritorious defenses to the plaintiff’s claims, defendants and plaintiffs agreed to the terms of a settlement on October 10, 2016 whereby additional disclosures were made in the Registration Statement. The terms of the settlement are subject to, among other things, further documentation and Court approval.

On September 8, 2016, Robert Garfield, a purported stockholder of OceanFirst, filed a putative class action in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Ocean County, captioned Garfield v. OceanFirst Financial Corp., et alNo. OCN-L-2469-16, against OceanFirst and members of the OceanFirst board on behalf of all public OceanFirst stockholders. The lawsuit generally alleges that the members of the OceanFirst board breached their fiduciary duties by approving the Transactions. The lawsuit further alleges the Transactions are not in the best interests of the OceanFirst stockholders and provide personal benefits to the individual defendants. The lawsuit also alleges that the Registration Statement omitted certain material information. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the Transactions, as well as unspecified money damages, costs and attorney’s fees and expenses. In furtherance of this action, on October 12, 2016, Robert Garfield filed a motion asking the court (i) to enjoin the consummation



of the Transactions pending completion of outstanding discovery requests, (ii) to direct OceanFirst to produce requested documents and be available for depositions and (iii) to set an evidentiary hearing to continue the injunction pending curative disclosures or, alternatively, trial. OceanFirst believes the allegations in the lawsuit are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend against all claims asserted. However, neither OceanFirst nor Ocean Shore can give you any assurance that OceanFirst may not face additional claims related to the Transactions.

Risk Factors (page 27)[])

You should consider all the information contained in or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus in deciding how to vote for the proposals presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In particular, you should consider the factors described under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 27.

[●].



SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF OCEANFIRST

The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial data for OceanFirst as of and for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011.2013. This information has been derived in part from and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of OceanFirst. The following table also presents selected historical consolidated financial data for OceanFirst as of and for each of the six monthsnine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 20162018 and JuneSeptember 30, 2015.2017. This information has been derived in part from and should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements of OceanFirst. You should read this information in conjunction with the historical financial statements of OceanFirst and the related notes, including those contained in OceanFirst’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152017 and in OceanFirst’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three monthsthree- and nine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2016,2018, each of which is incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

 

  As of and for the Six
Months Ended June 30,
  As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 
  2016*  2015**  2015**  2014  2013  2012  2011 
(in thousands, except per share data)                     

Operating Data

       

Interest income

 $56,214   $40,745   $85,863   $79,853   $80,157   $87,615   $95,387  

Interest expense

  5,641    4,179    9,034    7,505    9,628    14,103    18,060  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income

  50,573    36,566    76,829    72,348    70,529    73,512    77,327  

Provision for loan losses

  1,225    675    1,275    2,630    2,800    7,900    7,750  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  49,348    35,891    75,554    69,718    67,729    65,612    69,577  

Non-interest income

  8,259    8,157    16,426    18,577    16,458    17,724    14,845  

Non-interest expense

  36,770    27,896    58,897    57,764    59,244    52,389    52,208  

Merger related expenses

  8,591    234    1,878    —      —      —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

  12,246    15,918    31,205    30,531    24,943    30,947    32,214  

Provision for income taxes

  4,380    5,523    10,883    10,611    8,613    10,927    11,473  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

 $7,866   $10,395   $20,322   $19,920   $16,330   $20,020   $20,741  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per Share

       

Net income, basic

 $0.40   $0.63   $1.22   $1.19   $0.96   $1.13   $1.14  

Net income, diluted

  0.39    0.63    1.21    1.19    0.95    1.12    1.14  

Book value

  15.89    13.25    13.79    12.91    12.33    12.28    11.61  

Tangible book value

  13.14    13.25    13.67    12.91    12.33    12.28    11.61  

Cash dividends declared

  0.26    0.26    0.52    0.49    0.48    0.48    0.48  

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:

       

Basic

  19,694    16,433    16,600    16,687    17,071    17,730    18,191  

Diluted

  19,996    16,613    16,811    16,767    17,157    17,829    18,240  

Number of shares outstanding

  25,749    16,723    17,287    16,902    17,387    17,895    18,683  

Selected Balance Sheet Data

       

Total assets

 $4,047,493   $2,395,100   $2,593,068   $2,356,714   $2,249,711   $2,269,228   $2,302,094  

Investment securities(1)

  547,358    463,395    444,693    508,391    553,953    564,457    548,370  

Loans receivable, net(2)

  3,135,356    1,774,333    1,973,400    1,693,047    1,542,245    1,516,454    1,572,316  

Allowance for loan losses

  16,678    16,534    16,722    16,317    20,930    20,510    18,230  

Deposits

  3,206,262    1,761,675    1,916,678    1,720,135    1,746,763    1,719,671    1,706,083  

Total borrowings

  402,776    394,803    422,757    400,550    270,804    313,291    359,601  

Stockholders’ equity

  409,258    221,535    238,446    218,259    214,350    219,792    216,849  

Selected Performance Ratios

       

Return on average assets (annualized)(6)

  0.50  0.88  0.82  0.86  0.71  0.87  0.91

Return on average equity (annualized)(6)

  5.00    9.35    8.92    9.18    7.51    9.15    9.88  

Net interest margin(7)

  3.45    3.23    3.28    3.31    3.24    3.37    3.59  

Efficiency ratio(3)(6)

  77.10    62.90    65.17    63.53    68.11    57.42    56.64  

Tangible common equity to tangible assets(4)

  8.51    9.25    9.12    9.26    9.53    9.69    9.42  

  As of and for the Nine
Months Ended September 30,
  As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 
        2018^              2017        2017  2016†*  2015**  2014  2013 
(in thousands, except per share data)                     

Operating Data

       

Interest income

 $204,296  $140,923  $188,829  $133,425  $85,863  $79,853  $80,157 

Interest expense

  25,635   14,210   19,611   13,163   9,034   7,505   9,628 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income

  178,661   126,713   169,218   120,262   76,829   72,348   70,529 

Provision for loan losses

  2,984   3,030   4,445   2,623   1,275   2,630   2,800 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  175,677   123,683   164,773   117,639   75,554   69,718   67,729 

Non-interest income

  26,079   20,324   27,072   20,412   16,426   18,577   16,458 

Non-interest expense

  118,481   85,585   112,022   86,318   58,897   57,764   58,665 

Branch consolidation expenses

  2,911   6,939   6,205   —     —     —     579 

Merger related expenses

  25,863   6,300   8,293   16,534   1,878   —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

  54,501   45,183   65,325   35,199   31,205   30,531   24,943 

Provision for income taxes

  9,301   12,669   22,855   12,153   10,883   10,611   8,613 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

 $45,200  $32,514  $42,470  $23,046  $20,322  $19,920  $16,330 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per Share

       

Net income, basic

 $0.97  $1.01  $1.32  $1.00  $1.22  $1.19  $0.96 

Net income, diluted

  0.95   0.98   1.28   0.98   1.21   1.19   0.95 

Book value

  21.29   18.30   18.47   17.80   13.79   12.91   12.33 

Tangible book value

  13.93   13.47   13.58   12.94   13.67   12.91   12.33 

Cash dividends declared

  0.45   0.45   0.60   0.54   0.52   0.49   0.48 

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:

       

Basic

  46,451   32,073   32,113   23,093   16,600   16,687   17,071 

Diluted

  47,403   33,110   33,125   23,526   16,811   16,797   17,157 

Number of shares outstanding

  48,382   32,567   32,597   32,137   17,287   16,902   17,387 

Selected Balance Sheet Data

       

Total assets

 $7,562,589  $5,383,800  $5,416,006  $5,166,917  $2,593,068  $2,356,714  $2,249,711 

Investment securities (1)

  1,050,217   828,302   874,067   630,000   444,693   508,391   553,953 

Loans receivable, net (2)

  5,544,691   3,870,447   3,966,014   3,804,994   1,973,400   1,693,047   1,542,245 

Allowance for loan losses

  16,821   16,584   15,721   15,183   16,722   16,317   20,930 

Deposits

  5,854,250   4,350,259   4,342,798   4,187,750   1,916,678   1,720,135   1,746,763 

Total borrowings

  617,323   390,978   424,878   376,992   422,757   440,550   270,804 

Stockholders’ equity

  1,029,844   596,140   601,941   571,903   238,446   218,259   214,350 


 As of and for the Six
Months Ended June 30,
 As of and for the Year Ended December 31,  As of and for the Nine
Months Ended September 30,
 As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 
 2016* 2015** 2015** 2014 2013 2012 2011        2018^             2017       2017 2016†* 2015** 2014 2013 
(in thousands, except per share data)                              

Selected Performance Ratios

       

Return on average assets (annualized) (3)

 0.83 0.83 0.80 0.62 0.82 0.86 0.71

Return on average equity (annualized) (3)

 6.25  7.42  7.20  6.08  8.92  9.18  7.51 

Net interest margin (4)

 3.68  3.54  3.50  3.47  3.28  3.31  3.24 

Efficiency ratio (3)(5)

 71.92  67.21  64.46  73.11  65.17  63.53  68.11 

Tangible common equity to tangible assets (6)

 9.35  8.39  8.42  8.30  9.12  9.26  9.53 

Asset Quality Ratios

              

Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)(10)

 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.45 0.16 0.36 0.57

Allowance for loan losses to total loans receivable(8)(9)(10)

 0.53   0.92   0.84   0.95   1.33   1.32   1.15  

Nonperforming loans to total loans receivable(8)(9)(10)

 0.48   1.16   0.91   1.06   2.88   2.80   2.77  

Nonperforming assets to total assets(9)(10)

 0.62   1.01   1.05   0.97   2.21   2.05   2.00  

Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)

 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.15 0.05 0.45 0.16

Allowance for loan losses to total loans receivable (7)

 0.30  0.42  0.40  0.40  0.84  0.95  1.33 

Nonperforming loans to total loans receivable (7)(8)

 0.35  0.39  0.52  0.35  0.91  1.06  2.88 

Nonperforming assets to total assets (8)

 0.34  0.45  0.54  0.45  1.05  0.97  2.21 

Capital Ratios (Bank)

              

Total risk-based capital

 11.76 13.73 13.65 15.08 15.97 16.11 16.40 13.51 13.30 12.85 13.26 13.65 15.08 15.97

Tier I risk-based capital

 11.18   12.76   12.72   14.05   14.72   14.86   15.42   13.17  12.82  12.41  12.81  12.72  14.05  14.72 

Common equity Tier I(5)

 11.18   12.76   12.72    —      —      —      —    

Common equity Tier I (9)

 13.17  12.82  12.41  12.81  12.72   —     —   

Tier I leverage

 9.45   9.12   8.91   9.46   9.66   9.49   9.41   9.58  8.91  8.75  10.19  8.91  9.46  9.66 

 

*^

On January 31, 2018, OceanFirst closed its acquisition of Sun Bancorp, Inc. (we refer to such acquisition as the Cape acquisition on May 2, 2016.“Sun acquisition” and we refer to Sun Bancorp, Inc. as “Sun”).

**

On November 30, 2016, OceanFirst closed its merger with Colonial American Bank on July 31, 2015.acquisition of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (we refer to such acquisition as the “Ocean Shore acquisition” and we refer to Ocean Shore Holding Co. as “Ocean Shore”).

(1)*Investment securities include available-for-sale

On May 2, 2016, OceanFirst closed its acquisition of Cape Bancorp, Inc. (we refer to such acquisition as the “Cape acquisition” and held-to-maturity securities and Federal Home Loan Bank stock.we refer to Cape Bancorp, Inc. as “Cape”).

(2)**

On July 31, 2015, OceanFirst closed its acquisition of Colonial American Bank.

(1)

Investment securities includeavailable-for-sale securities,held-to-maturity securities, equity investments, and restricted equity investments.

(2)

Loans receivable, net, includes loans held for sale and is net of undisbursed loan funds, net deferred origination costs and the allowance for loan losses.

(3)Efficiency ratio is non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
(4)Tangible common equity to tangible assets is total stockholders’ equity less goodwill and other intangible assets divided by total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets.
(5)OceanFirst Bank became subject to new Basel III regulatory capital ratios in 2015. The common equity Tier I ratio was not reported in prior years.
(6)

Performance ratios for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 include merger related and branch consolidation of $28.8 million, with anafter-tax cost of $22.9 million. Performance ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 include merger related and branch consolidation expenses of $13.2 million with anafter-tax cost of $8.6 million. Performance ratios for the year ended December 31, 2017 include merger related, branch consolidation expenses and additional income tax expense related to Tax Reform of $18.1 million with an after tax cost of $13.5 million. Performance ratios for the year ended December 31, 2016 include merger related expenses of $8.6and the Federal Home Loan Bank advance prepayment fee totaling $16.7 million with an after-taxafter tax cost of $6.2$11.9 million. Performance ratios for the six months ended June 30,2015 include merger related expenses of $234,000 with an after-tax cost of $188,000. Performance ratios for the year ended December 31, 2015 include merger related expenses of $1.9 million with an after tax cost of $1.3 million. Performance ratios for 2013 include non-recurring expenses relating to the payment of Federal Home Loan Bank advancesadvance prepayment fee of $4.3 million and the consolidation of two branches into newer,in-market facilities, at a cost of $579,000. The total after tax cost was $3.1 million. Performance ratios for 2012 include an additional loan loss provision of $1.8 million relating to the superstorm Sandy and $687,000 in net severance expense. The total after tax cost was $1.6 million.

(7)(4)

The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

(8)(5)

Efficiency ratio isnon-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income andnon-interest income.

(6)

Tangible common equity to tangible assets is total stockholders’ equity less goodwill and other intangible assets divided by total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets.

(7)

Total loans receivable includes loans receivable and loansheld-for-sale.



(9)(8)

Non-performing assets consist ofnon-performing loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure.Non-performing loans consist of all loans 90 days or more past due and other loans in the process of foreclosure. It is OceanFirst’s policy to cease accruing interest on all such loans and to reverse previously accrued interest.

(10)(9)During the fourth quarter of 2011,

OceanFirst modified its charge-off policy on problem loans secured by real estate so that losses are charged offBank became subject to new Basel III regulatory capital ratios in the period the loans are deemed uncollectible rather than when the foreclosure process is completed.2015. The changecommon equity Tier I ratio was not reported in the charge-off policy resulted in additional charge-offs in the fourth quarter of 2011 of $5.7 million.prior years.



SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF OCEAN SHORE

The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial data for Ocean Shore as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011. This information has been derived in part from and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of Ocean Shore. The following table also presents selected historical consolidated financial data for Ocean Shore as of and for each of the six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015. This information has been derived in part from and should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Ocean Shore. You should read this information in conjunction with the historical financial statements of Ocean Shore and the related notes, including those contained in Ocean Shore’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in Ocean Shore’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2016, each of which is incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

  As of and for the Six
Months Ended June 30,
  As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011 
(in thousands, except per share data)                     

Operating Data

       

Interest and dividend income

 $17,673   $17,551   $35,150   $35,367   $34,972   $36,851   $38,087  

Interest expense

  3,026    3,403    6,696    7,566    8,512    10,217    12,186  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income

  14,647    14,148    28,454    27,801    26,460    26,634    25,901  

Provision for loan losses

  313    331    689    462    757    893    473  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  14,334    13,817    27,765    27,339    25,703    25,741    25,428  

Other income

  2,075    2,182    4,390    4,246    4,463    4,003    3,538  

Other expense

  11,078    10,814    21,888    21,765    21,972    21,563    20,376  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

  5,331    5,185    10,267    9,820    8,194    8,181    8,590  

Provision for income taxes

  1,799    1,733    3,399    3,522    2,845    3,180    3,532  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

 $3,532   $3,452   $6,868   $6,298   $5,349   $5,001   $5,058  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per Share Data

       

Earnings per share, basic

 $0.58   $0.58   $1.14   $1.00   $0.82   $0.75   $0.75  

Earnings per share, diluted

  0.57    0.57    1.12    0.98    0.81    0.74    0.74  

Dividends per share

  0.12    0.12    0.24    0.24    0.24    0.24    0.24  

Dividend payout ratio

  21.8  21.0  22.0  25.7  31.2  34.5  34.6

Weighted average shares—basic

  6,134    5,953    6,015    6,226    6,521    6,653    6,748  

Weighted average shares—diluted

  6,242    6,063    6,124    6,401    6,607    6,715    6,832  

Selected Financial Condition Data

       

Total assets

 $1,042,835   $1,019,031   $1,043,379   $1,024,754   $1,020,048   $1,045,488   $994,730  

Investment securities

  107,631    115,564    112,992    111,317    128,701    116,774    52,732  

Loans receivable, net

  791,219    780,789    783,948    774,017    744,802    703,898    727,626  

Deposits

  806,701    779,859    812,033    787,078    780,647    801,765    752,455  

Borrowings

  105,000    117,217    105,000    117,217    120,309    125,464    125,464  

Total equity

  115,651    106,884    111,789    105,811    106,223    104,728    104,680  

Performance Ratios

       

Return on average assets

  0.67  0.67  0.65  0.61  0.51  0.48  0.54

Return on average equity

  6.19    6.46    6.31    5.89    5.02    4.73    4.90  

Interest rate spread(1)

  3.11    3.01    3.04    3.08    3.10    3.43    3.54  

Net interest margin(2)

  3.26    3.18    3.19    3.15    3.12    3.37    3.51  

Noninterest expense to average assets

  2.10    2.09    2.08    2.10    2.09    2.08    2.18  

Efficiency ratio(3)

  66.25    66.22    66.64    67.91    71.05    70.38    69.21  

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities

  121.84    121.84    120.67    107.76    102.41    95.18    98.17  

Average equity to average assets

  10.79    10.32    10.34    10.32    10.16    10.20    11.03  

Capital Ratios(4)

       

Tier 1 leverage capital

  9.55  9.89  9.30  9.78  9.96  9.62  9.72

Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital

  18.40    19.09    17.94    —      —      —      —    

Tier 1 risk-based capital

  18.40    19.09    17.94    18.73    19.05    19.92    19.40  

Total risk-based capital

  18.99    19.73    18.52    19.24    19.77    20.63    18.75  



  As of and for the Six
Months Ended June 30,
  As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011 
(in thousands, except per share data)                     

Asset Quality Ratios

       

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans

  0.41  0.43  0.41  0.49  0.56  0.57  0.52

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming loans

  78.8    53.1    56.3    60.0    82.8    69.5    58.0  

Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans

  0.52    0.82    0.72    0.81    0.68    0.82    0.89  

Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets

  0.55    0.74    0.72    0.68    0.55    0.64    0.66  

(1)Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(2)Represents net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets.
(3)Represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, excluding gains or losses on the sale of securities.
(4)Ratios are for Ocean City Home Bank. Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital was introduced in 2015.



SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

The following table shows selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data about the financial condition and results of operations of OceanFirst giving effect to (a) the Transactions and (b) the Cape acquisition (we refer to (a) and (b) collectively as the “OceanFirst business combinations”).

With respect to the Transactions, the selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information assumes that the Transactions will be accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting with OceanFirst treated as the acquirer. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities of Ocean Shore, as of the effective date of the Transactions, will be recorded by OceanFirst at their respective estimated fair values and the excess of the merger consideration over the estimated fair value of Ocean Shore’s net identifiable assets will be allocated to goodwill.

The pro forma financial condition data set forth in the table below assumes that the Transactions became effective on June 30, 2016. The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statements for the periods ending December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2016 present the pro forma results of operations of OceanFirst giving effect to each of the OceanFirst business combinations (with separate columns to present the pro forma effect of the Transactions and the Cape acquisition) assuming that each OceanFirst business combination became effective on January 1, 2015.

The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information, including the notes thereto, which is included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus under the section entitled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements.” The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily indicate the financial results of the combined companies had the companies actually been combined at the beginning of the periods presented. The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data also does not consider any potential impacts of current market conditions on revenues, potential revenue enhancements, anticipated cost savings and expense efficiencies, or asset dispositions, among other factors. Further, as explained in more detail in the notes accompanying the more detailed unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information included under “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements” beginning on page 118, the pro forma allocation of purchase price reflected in the selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is subject to adjustment and may vary from the actual purchase price allocation that will be recorded at the time the Transactions are completed. Additionally, the adjustments made in the unaudited pro forma condensed financial information, which are described in those notes, are preliminary and may be revised.

   As of
June 30, 2016
 

Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Combined Statement of Financial Condition Data

  
(Dollars in thousands)    

Securities and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

  $660,919  

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses

   3,929,231  

Total assets

   5,102,739  

Deposits

   4,013,938  

Borrowings

   515,223  

Stockholders’ equity

   528,898  



  Six months ended
June 30, 2016
  Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 

Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Combined Statement of Income Data

  
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)      

Net interest income

 $83,165   $156,615  

Provision for loan losses

  2,754    4,639  

Non-interest income

  12,564    33,292  

Non-interest expense

  62,944    123,479  

Net income before income taxes

  30,031    61,789  

Net income

  18,257    42,285  

Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Combined Per Share Data

  

Net income per share — basic

 $0.54   $1.39  

Net income per share — diluted

  0.53    1.37  



UNAUDITED COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA

Presented below for OceanFirst and Ocean Shore is historical, unaudited pro forma combined and pro forma equivalent per share financial data. The information presented below should be read together with the historical consolidated financial statements of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, including the related notes, filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find More Information.” The unaudited pro forma combined and pro forma equivalent per share information gives effect to the Transactions as if they had been effective on June 30, 2016 in the case of the book value data, and as if the Transactions had been effective as of the beginning of the periods presented in the case of the earnings per share and the cash dividends data. The unaudited pro forma earnings per share data and dividend data combines the historical results of Ocean Shore into OceanFirst’s consolidated statement of income. While certain adjustments to the book value data were made for the estimated impact of fair value adjustments and other acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative of what could have occurred had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the period presented. In addition, the unaudited pro forma data includes adjustments that are preliminary and may be revised. The unaudited pro forma data, while helpful in illustrating the financial characteristics of the combined company under one set of assumptions, does not reflect the impact of factors that may result as a consequence of the Transactions or consider any potential impacts of current market conditions or the Transactions on revenues, expense efficiencies, asset dispositions and share repurchases, among other factors, nor the impact of possible business model changes. As a result, unaudited pro forma data is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent an attempt to predict or suggest future results.

   OceanFirst
Historical
   Ocean
Shore
   Pro Forma
Combined(1)
   Per
Equivalent
Ocean
Shore
Share
 

Book value per share:

        

At June 30, 2016

  $15.89    $18.03    $16.55    $16.00  

At December 31, 2015

  $13.79    $17.46    $16.28    $15.74  

Cash dividends declared per share:

        

Six months ended June 30, 2016

  $0.26    $0.12    $0.26    $0.25  

Year ended December 31, 2015

  $0.52    $0.24    $0.52    $0.50  

Basic earnings per share:

        

Six months ended June 30, 2016

  $0.40    $0.58    $0.54    $0.52  

Year ended December 31, 2015

  $1.22    $1.14    $1.39    $1.34  

Diluted earnings per share:

        

Six months ended June 30, 2016

  $0.39    $0.57    $0.53    $0.51  

Year ended December 31, 2015

  $1.21    $1.12    $1.37    $1.32  

(1)Pro forma dividends per share represent OceanFirst’s historical dividends per share.



RISK FACTORS

In addition to general investment risks and the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the matters addressed under the section “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 34[] you should carefully consider the following risk factors in deciding how to vote for the proposals presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You should also consider the other information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[].

Because the market price of OceanFirst common stock may fluctuate, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders cannot be certain of the precise value of the stock portion of the merger consideration they will be entitled to receive.

At the time the first-step merger is completed, each issued and outstanding share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, except for certain specified shares owned by OceanFirst, Capital Bank or Ocean Shore,stockholders who have properly exercised dissenters’ rights, will be converted into the right to receive $4.35 in cash, without interest, and 0.96671.25 shares of OceanFirst common stock, together with cash in lieu of fractional shares. There will be a lapse of time between each of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the date of the OceanFirst special meeting, the date of the Ocean Shore special meeting and the date on which Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders entitled to receive the merger consideration actually receive the merger consideration. The market value of OceanFirst common stock may fluctuate during these periods as a result of a variety of factors, includingwhich may include general market and economic conditions, changes in OceanFirst’s businesses, operations and prospects and regulatory considerations. Many of these factors are outside of the control of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore.Capital Bank. Consequently, at the time Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders must decide whether to approve the merger agreement,proposal, they will not know the actual market value of the shares of OceanFirst common stock they may receive when the first-step merger is completed. Although theThe value of the cash portion of the merger consideration is fixed at $4.35 per share of Ocean Shore common stock, the value of the portion of the merger consideration that is represented by shares of OceanFirst common stock will depend on the market value of shares of OceanFirst common stock on the date the merger consideration is received.received and thereafter. This value will not be known at the time of the Ocean Shore special meeting and may be more or less than the current price of OceanFirst common stock or the price of OceanFirst common stock at the time of the Ocean Shore special meeting.

The market price of OceanFirst common stock after the first-step merger is completed may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the market price of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or OceanFirst common stock currently.stock.

Upon completion of the first-step merger, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders will become OceanFirst stockholders. OceanFirst’s business differs in important respects from that of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of OceanFirst common stock after the completion of the first-step merger may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations of each of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore.Capital Bank. For a discussion of the businessesbusiness of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore and of some important factors to consider in connection with those businesses,that business, see the documents incorporated by reference insection of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and referred to underentitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[●].

Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected or may impose conditions that are not presently anticipated or that could have an adverse effect on the combined company following the Transactions.merger.

Before the Transactionsmerger can be completed, OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreBank must obtain approvalsapproval of the merger or waiversa waiver of such approval from the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the FRB waiver request has been granted. Other approvals, waivers or consents from regulators may also be required. In determining whether to grant these approvals, waivers and consents the regulators consider a variety of factors, including the regulatory standing of each party and the factors described under the section of this joint proxy

statement/prospectus entitled “The Transactions —RegulatoryMerger — Regulatory Approvals Required for the Completion of the Transactions”Merger” beginning on page 92.[●]. An adverse development in either party’s regulatory standing or these factors could result in an inability to obtain approval or a delay in their receipt. These regulators may impose conditions on the completion of the Transactionsmerger or require changes to the terms of the Transactions.merger. Such conditions or changes could have the effect of delaying or preventing completion of the Transactionsmerger or imposing additional costs on or limiting the

revenues of the combined company following the completion of the Transactions,merger, any of which might have an adverse effect on the combined company following the completion of the Transactions.merger. However, under the terms of the merger agreement, in connection with obtaining such regulatory approvals or waivers, neither party is required to take any action, or commit to take any action, or agree to any condition or restriction, that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect (measured on a scale relative to Ocean Shore)Capital Bank) on any of OceanFirst, Ocean ShoreOceanFirst Bank, Capital Bank or the surviving corporation,bank, after giving effect to the integrated mergersmerger (which we refer to as a “materially burdensome regulatory condition”). For more information, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The TransactionsMerger — Regulatory Approvals Required for the Transactions”Merger” beginning on page 92.[●].

Combining the two companies may be more difficult, costly or time consuming than expected and the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Transactionsmerger may not be realized.

OceanFirst Bank and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank have operated and, until the completion of the Transactions,merger, will continue to operate, independently. The success of the Transactions,merger, including anticipated benefits and cost savings, will depend, in part, on OceanFirst’s ability to successfully combine and integrate the businesses of OceanFirst Bank and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank in a manner that permits growth opportunities and does not materially disrupt the existing customer relations nor result in decreased revenues due to loss of customers. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of either company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect the combined company’s ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors, employees and other constituents or to achieve the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Transactions.merger. The loss of key employees could adversely affect OceanFirst’s ability to successfully conduct its business, which could have an adverse effect on OceanFirst’s financial results and the value of its common stock. If OceanFirst experiences difficulties with the integration process, the anticipated benefits of the Transactionsmerger may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. As with any merger of financial institutions, there also may be business disruptions that cause OceanFirst and/or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank to lose customers or cause customers to remove their accounts from OceanFirst and/or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and move their business to competing financial institutions. Integration efforts between the two companies, as well as OceanFirst’s ongoing integration efforts relating to the CapeSun acquisition, will also divert management attention and resources. These integration matters could have an adverse effect on each of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst during this transition period and for an undetermined period after completion of the Transactionmerger on the combined company. In addition, the actual cost savings realized as a result of the Transactionsmerger could be less than anticipated.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements included in this document are preliminary. The actual financial condition and results of operations of OceanFirst after the completion of the Transactions may differ materially.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what OceanFirst’s actual financial condition or results of operations would have been had the Transactions been completed on the dates indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro forma income statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the six month period ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of what OceanFirst’s actual results of operations would have been had the Cape acquisition been completed as of January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2016, respectively. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements reflect adjustments to illustrate the effect of the Transactions (and, in the case of the pro forma income statements, the effect of the Cape acquisition) had they been completed on the dates indicated. Such unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are

based upon preliminary estimates, to record the Ocean Shore identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value and the resulting goodwill recognized.

The purchase price allocation for the first-step merger reflected in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is preliminary, and final allocation of the purchase price will be based upon the actual purchase price and the fair value of the identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities of Ocean Shore as of the date of the completion of the Transactions. Accordingly, the final acquisition accounting adjustments may differ materially from the pro forma adjustments reflected in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. For more information, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements” beginning on page 118.

Certain of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s directors and executive officers have interests in the Transactionsmerger that may differ from the interests of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders.

The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders should be aware that some of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s directors and executive officers have interests in the Transactionsmerger and have arrangements that are different from, or in addition to, those of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders generally. The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board was aware of these interests and considered these interests, among other matters, when making its decision to approve the merger agreement, and in recommending that Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders vote in favor of the Ocean Shore merger proposal and certain related matters and against alternative transactions.

The material interests considered by the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board were as follows:

 

The awards of stock options that Ocean Shore has made to certain executive officers and directors under its equity incentive plan. As a result of the first-step merger, each stock option, whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to closing will fully vest and be converted into an option to acquire a number of shares of OceanFirst common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) determined by multiplying (i) the number of shares of Ocean Shore common stock subject to such Ocean Shore option immediately prior to the effective time by (ii) 1.2084; and the exercise per share of the new option (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) will be equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the per share exercise price for the shares of Ocean Shore common stock subject to such Ocean Shore stock option by (ii) 1.2084;

The awards of restricted stock that Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has made to certain of its executive officers and directors under its equity incentive plans. As a resultdirectors. At the effective time, each unvested share of the first-step merger, each restricted stock award that is outstanding immediately prior to closing will fully vest and the restrictions on those restricted stock awards will lapse, and each holder of restricted stock will be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration in exchange for each sharethe cancellation of Ocean Shore common stock held by such holder;shares; and

 

The employment agreementagreements of Steven E. Brady, Presidenteach of Mr. Hanrahan, Mr. Lobosco and Chief Executive OfficerMr. Rehm, as recently amended, that, subject to each of Ocean Shore, thatMr. Hanrahan, Mr. Lobosco and Mr. Rehm, respectively, signing a release on or after the closing date, provides for a cash severance payment and continued health, life and disability insurance coverage benefits in the event of a termination of employment without cause or for good reason within two years following a change in control;

Change in control agreements for certain Ocean Shore executive officers, including Janet M. Bossi, Executive Vice President, Lending, Kim M. Davidson, Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary, Donald F. Morgenweck, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Anthony J. Rizzotte, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer and Paul Esposito, Senior Vice President of Operations that provide for cash severance payments and continued health and welfare insurance coverage in the event of a termination of employment without cause or for good reason within one year following a change in control;

The supplemental executive retirement plan maintained by Ocean Shore that provides Mr. Brady with a benefit if a change in control occurs;

The separation and consulting agreement into which Mr. Brady is anticipated to enter with OceanFirst providing for payments and benefits payment to be made in full satisfactioneach of Mr. Brady’s rights under his employment agreement in connection with his termination thereunder following the first-step mergerthem and setting forth the terms of his consulting arrangement with,a retention and his role as a director of, OceanFirstnon-compete payment to Messrs. Hanrahan and OceanFirst Bank following the first-step merger;Rehm.

The agreements into which Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson are anticipated to enter with OceanFirst providing for certain payments in lieu of the cash severance under their change in control agreements and setting forth their new positions at OceanFirst following the effective time of the first-step merger;

The salary continuation agreements that Ocean Shore maintains with Mr. Brady, Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson pursuant to which, following a change in control, they will be entitled to the normal retirement benefit under such agreements even if their employment terminates prior to their normal retirement ages;

The split dollar life insurance agreements that Ocean Shore maintains with Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson that will remain in effect, unless mutually terminated, if Ms. Bossi or Ms. Davidson terminates employment other than for cause following a change in control;

The rights of Ocean Shore executive officers and directors to continued indemnification coverage and continued coverage under directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies;

That Mr. Brady and two other directors are expected to be appointed as a member of the OceanFirst board and the OceanFirst Bank boards; and

OceanFirst’s agreement to create an advisory board consisting of Mr. Brady and each member of the Ocean Shore board who has not been appointed to the OceanFirst board.

For a more complete description of these interests, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The TransactionsMerger — Interests of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Transactions”Merger” beginning on page 85.[●].

The merger agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms, and the merger may not be completed.

The merger agreement is subject to a number of customary closing conditions that must be satisfied or waived in order to complete the merger, including the receipt of the requisite approval of the Capital Bank stockholders and the requisite regulatory approvals. These conditions to the closing of the merger may not be satisfied or waived in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the merger may be delayed or may not be completed. In addition, OceanFirst and Capital Bank may elect to terminate the merger agreement in certain other circumstances and, in certain circumstances, Capital Bank may be required to pay OceanFirst a termination fee of $3.2 million.

Termination of the merger agreement could negatively impact Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or OceanFirst.

If the merger agreement is terminated, there may be various consequences. For example, Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s or OceanFirst’s businesses may have been impacted adversely by the failure to pursue other opportunities due to management’s focus on the Transactions,merger, without realizing any of the anticipated benefits of completing the Transactions.merger. Additionally, if the merger agreement is terminated, the market price of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock or the OceanFirst common stock could decline to the extent that the current market prices reflect a market assumption that the Transactionsmerger will be completed. If the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, Ocean Shore or OceanFirstCapital Bank may be required to pay to the other partyOceanFirst a termination fee of $5.72$3.2 million.

Furthermore, each of OceanFirst and Capital Bank has incurred and will incur substantial expenses in connection with the completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, as well as the costs and expenses of filing, printing and mailing this proxy statement/prospectus and all filing and other fees paid to the SEC in connection with the merger. If the merger is not completed, OceanFirst and Capital Bank would have to recognize these expenses without realizing the expected benefits of the merger.

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Transactions aremerger is pending.

Uncertainty about the effect of the Transactionsmerger on employees and customers may have an adverse effect on Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or OceanFirst. These uncertainties may impair Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s or OceanFirst’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Transactions aremerger is completed, and could cause customers and others that deal with Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or OceanFirst to seek to change existing business relationships with Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or OceanFirst. Retention of certain employees by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or OceanFirst may be challenging while the Transactions aremerger is pending, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with OceanFirst. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or OceanFirst, Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s business or OceanFirst’s business could be harmed. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has agreed to operate its business in the ordinary

course prior to closing, and each of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst has agreed to certain restrictive covenants. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Covenants and Agreements” beginning on page 100[●] for a description of the restrictive covenants applicable to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst.

Litigation relating to the Transactions could require us to incur significant costs and suffer management distraction, as well as delay and/or enjoin the Transactions.

On July 22, 2016, Robert Strougo, a purported Ocean Shore stockholder, filed a putative class action lawsuit in the Superior Court for the State of New Jersey, Cape May County, against Ocean Shore, the members of the Ocean Shore board and OceanFirst on behalf of all Ocean Shore public stockholders. The lawsuit generally alleges that the members of the Ocean Shore board breached their fiduciary duties by approving the merger agreement because the Transactions are procedurally flawed and financially inadequate, certain terms in the merger agreement are preclusive and unfair, and certain members of the Ocean Shore board are conflicted. Plaintiff further alleges that OceanFirst aided and abetted such breaches. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the merger, as well as unspecified money damages, costs and attorney’s fees and expenses. On September 7, 2016, plaintiff filed an amended complaint bringing disclosure claims alleging that OceanFirst’s registration statement on Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, omitted certain material information. Although the defendants believe that they have meritorious defenses to the plaintiff’s claims, defendants and plaintiffs agreed to the terms of a settlement on October 10, 2016 whereby additional disclosures were made in the Registration Statement. The terms of the settlement are subject to, among other things, further documentation and Court approval.

On September 8, 2016, Robert Garfield, a purported stockholder of OceanFirst, filed a putative class action in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Ocean County, captioned Garfield v. OceanFirst Financial Corp., et alNo. OCN-L-2469-16, against OceanFirst and members of the OceanFirst board on behalf of all public OceanFirst stockholders. The lawsuit generally alleges that the members of the OceanFirst board breached their fiduciary duties by approving the Transactions. The lawsuit further alleges the Transactions are not in the best interests of the OceanFirst stockholders and provide personal benefits to the individual defendants. The lawsuit also alleges that the Registration Statement omitted certain material information. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the Transactions, as well as unspecified money damages, costs and attorney’s fees and expenses. In furtherance of this action, on October 12, 2016, Robert Garfield filed a motion asking the court (i) to enjoin the consummation of the Transactions pending completion of outstanding discovery requests, (ii) to direct OceanFirst to produce requested documents and be available for depositions and (iii) to set an evidentiary hearing to continue the injunction pending curative disclosures or, alternatively, trial. OceanFirst believes the allegations in the lawsuit are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend against all claims asserted. However, neither OceanFirst nor Ocean Shore can give you any assurance that OceanFirst may not face additional claims related to the Transactions.

A negative outcome in these suits could have a material adverse effect on Ocean Shore and OceanFirst if they result in preliminary or permanent injunctive relief or rescission of the merger agreement. Such actions may also create additional uncertainty relating to the Transactions, and responding to such demands and defending such actions may be costly and distracting to management. Neither Ocean Shore nor OceanFirst is currently able to predict the outcome of the suit with any certainty. Additional suits arising out of or relating to the proposed transaction may be filed in the future. If additional similar complaints are filed, absent new or different allegations that are material, Ocean Shore and OceanFirst will not necessarily announce such additional filings.

If the Transactions are not completed, OceanFirst and Ocean Shore will have incurred substantial expenses without realizing the expected benefits of the Transactions.

Each of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore has incurred and will incur substantial expenses in connection with the negotiation and completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, as well as the costs and

expenses of filing, printing and mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and all filing and other fees paid to the SEC in connection with the first-step merger. If the Transactions are not completed, OceanFirst and Ocean Shore would have to recognize these expenses without realizing the expected benefits of the Transactions.

The merger agreement limits Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s ability to pursue acquisition proposals and requires either companyCapital Bank to pay OceanFirst a termination fee of $5.72$3.2 million under limitedcertain circumstances, including circumstances relating to competing acquisition proposals for Ocean Shore. Additionally, certain provisions of Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws may deter potential acquirers.Capital Bank.

The merger agreement prohibits Ocean ShoreCapital Bank from initiating, soliciting, knowinglyinducing, encouraging or knowingly facilitating certain third-party acquisition proposals. For more information, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Agreement Not to Solicit Other Offers” beginning on page 107.[●]. In addition,

unless the merger agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has an unqualified obligation to submit the Ocean Shore merger proposal to a vote by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders, even if Ocean ShoreCapital Bank receives a proposal that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board believes is superior to the Transactions.merger. For more information, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Stockholder Meetings and Recommendation of the Boards of Directors of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst”Capital Bank” beginning on page 105.[●]. The merger agreement also provides that OceanFirst or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank must pay OceanFirst a termination fee in the amount of $5.72$3.2 million in the event that the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, including Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s failure to abide by certain obligations not to solicit acquisition proposals. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement —Termination Fee” beginning on page 110.[●]. These provisions might discourage a potential competing acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank from considering or proposing such an acquisition. Each director of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, solely in his or her capacity as an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder, has entered into a separate voting and support agreement with OceanFirst, pursuant to which each such director has (a) agreed to vote in favor of the Ocean Shore merger proposal and certain related matters and against alternative transactions.transactions and (b) waived dissenters’ rights. As of the Ocean Shore record date, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank directors that are party to these voting and support agreements beneficially owned and were entitled to vote in the aggregate approximately 5.7%[●]% of the outstanding shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock. For more information see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Ocean Shore Voting and Support Agreements” beginning on page 111. Additionally, certain provisions of Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws or of the NJBCA could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire control of Ocean Shore or may discourage a potential competing acquirer.[●].

The shares of OceanFirst common stock to be received by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders as a result of the first-step merger will have different rights from the shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock.

The rights of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders are currently governed by the NJBCA, Ocean Shore’sNJ Banking Act, Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation and Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s bylaws. Upon completion of the first-step merger, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders will become OceanFirst stockholders and their rights as stockholders will then be governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law (which we refer to as the “DGCL”), OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation and OceanFirst’s bylaws. The rights associated with Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock are different from the rights associated with OceanFirst common stock. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Comparison of Stockholders’ Rights” beginning on page 126[●] for a discussion of the different rights associated with OceanFirst common stock.

Holders of Ocean Shore and OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the first-step merger and will exercise less influence over management.

Holders of Ocean Shore and OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock currently have the right to vote in the election of the board of directors and on other matters affecting Ocean Shore and OceanFirst, respectively.Capital Bank. Upon the completion of the first-step merger, each Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholder who receives shares of OceanFirst common stock will become an OceanFirst stockholder with a percentage ownership of OceanFirst that is significantly smaller than the

stockholder’s current percentage ownership of Ocean Shore.Capital Bank. It is currently expected that the former Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders as a group will receive shares in the first-step merger constituting approximately 20%[●]% of the outstanding shares of OceanFirst common stock immediately after the first-step merger. As a result, current OceanFirst stockholders as a group will own approximately 80%[●]% of the outstanding shares of OceanFirst common stock immediately after the first-step merger. Because of this reduced ownership percentage, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders maywill have less influence on the management and policies of OceanFirst than they now have on the management and policies of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank.

If a specified number of Capital Bank stockholders exercise dissenters’ rights, Capital Bank and current OceanFirst may not be able to complete the merger and may incur significant additional costs

Capital Bank stockholders are entitled to assert dissenters’ rights provided by the National Bank Act, as described in more detail in the section titled “The Merger — Dissenters’ Rights” beginning on page [●]. If the merger is completed, a Capital Bank stockholder who has complied with applicable requirements under 12 U.S.C. § 215a may have less influence than they now have onrequire OceanFirst to pay in cash the management and policiesappraised value of OceanFirst. Upon consummationsuch stockholder’s dissenting shares

instead of the Transactions,merger consideration. The merger agreement contains a closing condition that can only be waived by OceanFirst has agreed to increase the sizethat holders of not more than 10% of the OceanFirst board and the boardoutstanding shares of directors ofCapital Bank common stock may assert such dissenters’ rights. OceanFirst, OceanFirst Bank and Capital Bank cannot predict the number of shares of Capital Bank common stock that will constitute dissenting shares in the merger, the amount of cash that OceanFirst may be required to thirteen members and appoint Steven E. Brady and two other current members ofpay following the Ocean Shore board, to be selected by the Leadership Committee of OceanFirst in consultation with the OceanFirst board and the Ocean Shore board, to the OceanFirst board and the board of directors of OceanFirst Bank, with one such appointee being appointed to each of the three classes of directors of OceanFirst and OceanFirst Bank.

In addition, at the effective time of the first-step merger OceanFirst has agreed to create an advisory board, the purpose of which will be to advise OceanFirst with respect to the integration of Ocean Shore’s business, as well as to maintain and develop customer and other stakeholder relationships in Ocean Shore’s market area. The advisory board is expected to consist of Steven E. Brady anddissenting shares or the four current members of the Ocean Shore board who are not selected for appointment to theexpenses that OceanFirst board and the board of directors of OceanFirst Bank, as described above. The members of the advisory board will be appointed to the advisory board for a term ending on the second anniversary of the effective time of the first-step merger.

Ocean Shore stockholders do not have dissenters’ or appraisal rights in the first-step merger.

Dissenters’ rights are statutory rights that, if applicable under law, enable stockholders to dissent from an extraordinary transaction, such as a merger, and to demand that the corporation pay the fair value of their shares as determined by a court in a judicial proceeding instead of receiving the consideration offered to stockholdersmay incur in connection with the extraordinary transaction. New Jerseyappraisal process. If the number of dissenting shares exceeds the percentage described above it could prevent the merger from being completed.

The merger is expected to, but may not, qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code.

The parties expect the merger to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, and the obligation each of OceanFirst and Capital Bank to complete the merger is conditioned upon the receipt of an opinion to that effect from their respective U.S. tax counsel. These opinions will represent the legal judgment of counsel and are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or the courts. If the merger does not qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, then a Capital Bank stockholder may be required to recognize any gain or loss equal to the difference between (1) the sum of the fair market value of OceanFirst common stock received by the Capital Bank stockholder in the merger and the amount of cash, if any, received by the Capital Bank stockholder in the merger in lieu of fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock, and (2) the Capital Bank stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares of Capital Bank common stock exchanged therefor. For further information, please refer to the section entitled “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.” You should consult your tax advisor to determine the particular tax consequences to you in light of your particular circumstances.

Litigation against OceanFirst or Capital Bank or their respective board of directors could prevent or delay the completion of the merger or result in the payment of damages following the completion of the merger.

While OceanFirst and Capital Bank believe that any claims that may be asserted by purported stockholder plaintiffs related to the merger would be without merit, the results of any such potential legal proceedings are difficult to predict and could delay or prevent the merger from becoming effective in a timely manner. The existence of litigation related to the merger could affect the likelihood of obtaining the required approval of the merger proposal. Moreover, any litigation could be time consuming and expensive, could divert OceanFirst management or Capital Bank management’s attention away from their regular business and, if any lawsuit is adversely resolved against OceanFirst, Capital Bank or their respective board of directors, it could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of OceanFirst, Capital Bank or the surviving bank in the merger.

One of the conditions to the consummation of the merger is the absence of any law provides thator order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) by any court or regulatory authority of competent jurisdiction prohibiting, restricting or making illegal the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (including the merger). Consequently, if a stockholdersettlement or other resolution is not entitledreached in any lawsuit that is filed and a claimant secures injunctive or other relief prohibiting, delaying or otherwise adversely affecting OceanFirst or Capital Bank’s ability to demandcomplete the fairmerger, then such injunctive or other relief may prevent the merger from becoming effective in a timely manner or at all.

The unaudited pro forma financial data included in this proxy statement/prospectus is illustrative only, and may differ materially from OceanFirst’s actual financial position and results of operations in the future, including after the merger.

The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements of OceanFirst are presented for illustrative purposes only and, pursuant to the instructions to FormS-4 and the rules promulgated under RegulationS-X, reflect the pro forma effects of the Sun acquisition as of the dates set forth therein and for the periods then ended and do not include or reflect the pro forma effects of the merger. Such pro forma financial

statements do not include any adjustments for the potential cost savings, revenue synergies or any restructuring or other costs incurred with respect to the Sun acquisition, and, therefore, while such amounts have not yet been determined, the financial effects of the Sun acquisition may differ materially from the unaudited pro forma financial statements set forth herein. However, there can be no assurance that any potential cost savings or revenue synergies will be achieved from the Sun acquisition. The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the financial position or results of operations of OceanFirst actually would have been had the Sun acquisition been completed at the dates indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information does not purport to project the future financial position or operating results of the combined company after the Sun acquisition or the merger.

The fairness opinion received by the Capital Bank board from its financial advisor prior to execution of the merger agreement does not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion.

Boenning, Capital Bank’s financial advisor in connection with the merger, delivered to the Capital Bank board its fairness opinion on October 25, 2018. The opinion speaks only as of the date of such opinion. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of OceanFirst or Capital Bank, changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes may materially alter or affect the relative values of OceanFirst and Capital Bank.

Estimates as to the future value of histhe combined company are inherently uncertain. You should not rely on such estimates without considering all of the information contained in or herincorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.

Any estimates as to the future value of the combined company, including estimates regarding the earnings per share of the combined company, are inherently uncertain. The future value of the combined company will depend upon, among other factors, the combined company’s ability to achieve projected revenue and earnings expectations and to realize the anticipated synergies described in this proxy statement/prospectus, all of which are subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this proxy statement/prospectus, including these risk factors. Accordingly, you should not rely upon any estimates as to the future value of the combined company, whether made before or after the date of this proxy statement/prospectus by OceanFirst’s and Capital Bank’s respective management teams or others, without considering all of the information contained in or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.

If the merger is not completed, Capital Bank will have incurred substantial expenses without realizing the expected benefits.

Capital Bank will incur substantial expenses in connection with the merger. The completion of the merger depends on the satisfaction or waiver of specified conditions and the receipt of regulatory approval of the merger, or waiver of such approval, from the OCC. Capital Bank cannot guarantee that these conditions will be met. If the merger is not completed, these expenses could have a material adverse impact on the financial condition of Capital Bank because it would not have realized the expected benefits from the merger.

In addition, if the merger is not completed, Capital Bank may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from its stockholders, customers and employees. Also, Capital Bank may not be able to successfully resume independent operations, or enter into a merger agreement with another party. If it is able to enter into another merger agreement, it may be at a lower price. If the merger is not completed, Capital Bank cannot assure its stockholders that the risks described above will not materialize and will not materially affect the business and financial results of Capital Bank or the price at which shares of stock in any transaction if the stock is listed on a national securities exchange, if cash is to be received or the securities to be received are listed on a national securities exchange. Because the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock is listed on the NASDAQ, the holders of Ocean Shore common stock are not entitled to dissenters’ or appraisal rights in the first-step merger.trade.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains forward-looking statements.“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (which we refer to as the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (which we refer to as the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements may include: management plans relating to the Transactions;merger; the expected timing of the completion of the Transaction;merger; the ability to complete the Transactions;merger; the ability to obtain any required regulatory, stockholder or other approvals; any statements of the plans and objectives of management for future operations, products or services, including the execution of integration plans relating to the Transactionsmerger and OceanFirst’s recently completed acquisition of Cape;Sun acquisition; any statements of expectation or belief; projections related to certain financial metrics; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “will,” “would,” “target,” “outlook,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project” and other similar words and expressions.expressions or negatives of these words. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which change over time and are beyond our control. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Neither OceanFirst nor Ocean ShoreCapital Bank assumes any duty and does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements. Because forward-looking statements are by their nature, to different degrees, uncertain and subject to assumptions, and uncertainties, actual results or future events could differ, possibly materially, from those that OceanFirst or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank anticipated in its forward-looking statements and future results could differ materially from historical performance. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those included under the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page [●] and under Item 1A “Risk Factors” in OceanFirst’s Annual Report on Form10-K, those included under Item 1A “Risk Factors” in Ocean Shore’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, those disclosed in OceanFirst’s and Ocean Shore’s respective other periodic reports filed with the SEC, as well as the possibility: that expected benefits of the Transactionsmerger and the CapeSun acquisition may not materialize in the timeframe expected or at all, or may be more costly to achieve; that the Transactionsmerger may not be timely completed, if at all; that prior to the completion of the Transactionsmerger or thereafter, OceanFirst’s and Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s respective businesses may not perform as expected due to transaction-related uncertainty or other factors; that the parties are unable to successfully implement integration strategies relating to the Transactionsmerger or the CapeSun acquisition; that required regulatory, stockholder or other approvals are not obtained or other customary closing conditions are not satisfied in a timely manner or at all; reputational risks and the reaction of the companies’ customers, employees and other constituents to the Transactions;transaction; and diversion of management time on merger-related matters. For any forward-looking statements made in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or in any documents, OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Annualized, pro forma, projected and estimated numbers are used for illustrative purposes only, are not forecasts and may not reflect actual results.

THE OCEAN SHORECAPITAL BANK SPECIAL MEETING

This section contains information for Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders about the Ocean Shore special meeting that Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has called to allow its stockholders to consider and vote on the Ocean Shore merger proposal, the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal and the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank is mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to you, as an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder, on or about [], 2016.2018. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is accompanied by a notice of the Ocean Shore special meeting and a form of proxy card that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board is soliciting for use at the Ocean Shore special meeting and at any adjournments or postponements of the Ocean Shore special meeting.

Date, Time and Place of the Ocean Shore Special Meeting

The Ocean Shore special meeting willis scheduled to be held at The Flanders Hotel, 719 East 11th Street, Ocean City, NJ 08226,the Luciano Conference Center, Cumberland County College, at 8:30 a.m.[●] local time, on November 22, 2016.[●], 2019. On or about [●], 2016, Ocean Shore commenced2018, Capital Bank will commence mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed form of proxy card to its stockholders entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

Matters to Be Considered

At the Ocean Shore special meeting, you, as an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder, will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:

 

the Ocean Shore merger proposal; and

 

the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal; and

the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal.

Recommendation of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Board

The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the first-step merger, are advisable and in the best interests of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and its stockholders, has unanimously approved the merger agreement and the merger and unanimously recommends that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger proposal, “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal and “FOR” the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The TransactionsMerger — Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Reasons for the Transactions;Merger; Recommendation of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Board” beginning on page 54[●] for a more detailed discussion of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board’s recommendation.

Ocean Shore Record Date and Quorum

The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board has fixed the close of business on September 23, 2016,[●], 2018, as the Ocean Shore record date for determining the Ocean Shoreits stockholders entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Ocean Shore special meeting.

As of the Ocean Shore record date, there were 6,511,006[●] shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock outstanding and entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Ocean Shore special meeting held by 528[●] holders of record. Subject to the ten percent voting limitation set forth in Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation, eachEach share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock entitles the holder to one vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting on each proposal to be considered at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

The presence at the Ocean Shore special meeting, in person or by proxy, of holders representing at least a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock entitled to be voted at the Ocean Shore special meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Ocean Shore special meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes, if any, will be treated as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for all matters voted on at the Ocean Shorespecial meeting. Once a share is represented for any purpose at the special meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the special meeting or any adjournment of the special meeting.

Required Vote; Treatment of Abstentions, BrokerNon-Votes and Failure to Vote

Ocean Shore mergerMerger proposal:

 

  

Standard:Standard: Approval of the Ocean Shore merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majoritythe holders of at leasttwo-thirds of the votes cast by Ocean Shore stockholderscommon stock of Capital Bank entitled to vote at the Ocean Shore special meeting.

  

Effect of abstentions and brokernon-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the Ocean Shore merger proposal, it will have nothe same effect onas a vote AGAINST the Ocean Shore merger proposal.

Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal:Adjournment proposal:

 

  

Standard:Standard: The Ocean Shore merger-related compensationadjournment proposal will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on such proposalrepresented at the Ocean Shore special meeting are voted in favor of such proposal.

 

  

Effect of abstentions and brokernon-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, card, fail to submit a proxy card or fail to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting, orif you fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the Ocean Shore merger-related compensationadjournment proposal (and your bank or broker’s shares are included in determining the number of shares present at the meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum), it will have nothe same effect on suchas a vote AGAINST the adjournment proposal.

Ocean Shore adjournment proposal:

Standard: The Ocean Shore adjournment proposal will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on such proposal at the Ocean Shore special meeting are voted in favor of such proposal.

Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy card, fail to submit a proxy card or fail to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal, it will have no effect on the vote with respect to such proposal.

Shares Held by Officers Directors and Certain StockholdersDirectors

As of the Ocean Shorerecord date, there were [●] shares of Capital Bank common stock outstanding, held by [●] holders of record. As of the record date, the directors and executive officers of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and their affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote approximately 609,013[●] shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, representing approximately 9.4%[●]% of the shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock outstanding on that date.

Each of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s directors, in his or her capacity as an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder, has entered into a separate voting and support agreement with OceanFirst, pursuant to which each such director has (a) agreed to vote in favor of the Ocean Shore merger proposal and certain related matters and against alternative transactions.transactions and (b) waived dissenters’ rights. As of the Ocean Shore record date, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank directors that are party to these voting and support agreements beneficially owned and were entitled to vote in the aggregate approximately 5.7%[●]% of the outstanding shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock. For more information regarding the voting and support agreements, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement — Ocean Shore Voting and Support Agreements” beginning on page 111.[●]. As of the Ocean Shore record date, OceanFirst did not beneficially hold anyheld [●] shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock.

Voting of Proxies; Incomplete Proxies

Any Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholder may vote by proxy or in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting. If you hold your shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock in your name as a stockholder of record, to submit a proxy you, as an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder, may use one of the following methods:

 

Through the Internet: by visiting the website indicated on your proxy card and following the instructions; orinstructions.

 

by completing

Complete and returningreturn the proxy card in the enclosed envelope. The envelope requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States.

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank requests that Ocean Shoreits stockholders vote over the Internet prior to midnight on January [●], 2019 or by completing and signing the accompanying proxy card and returning it to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank as soon as possible in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. When the accompanying proxy card is returned properly executed, the shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock represented by it will be voted at the Ocean Shore special meeting in accordance with the instructions contained on the proxy card. If any proxy card is returned signed but without indication as to how to vote, the shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock represented by the proxy card will be voted as recommended by the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board.

Every Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholder’s vote is important. Accordingly, each Ocean Shore stockholder should sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card, or, prior to midnight on January [●], 2019, vote via the Internet, whether or not the Ocean Shore stockholder plans to attend the Ocean Shore special meeting in person. Sending in your proxy card or voting on the Internet will not prevent you from voting your shares personally at the meeting, since you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted.

Shares Held in “Street Name”

If you are an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder and your shares are held in “street name” through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must provide the record holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote the shares. Please follow the voting instructions provided by the bank or broker. Ocean Shore’s stockholdersStockholders should check the voting form used by that firm to determine whether you may vote by telephone or the Internet. You may not vote shares held in street name by returning a proxy card directly to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or by voting in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee.

Furthermore, brokers, banks or other nominees who hold shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock on behalf of their customers will not vote your shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock or give a proxy to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank to vote those shares with respect to the Ocean Shore merger proposal without specific instructions from you, asbecause brokers, banks and other nominees do not have discretionary voting power on such proposal. A brokernon-vote occurs when the broker holder of record is unable to vote on a proposal because the proposal isnon-routine and the beneficial owner does not provide any instructions. The merger proposal is a“non-routine” matter.

Revocability of Proxies and Changes to an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank Stockholder’s Vote

You have the power to change your vote at any time before your shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock are voted at the Ocean Shore special meeting by:

 

voting again through the Internet prior to midnight on January [●], 2019, or completing a new proxy card with a later date – your latest vote will be counted;

filing with the Secretary of Capital Bank written notice of such revocation; or

attending and votingthe special meeting in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting;

giving notice of revocation of the proxy at the Ocean Shore special meeting; or

and delivering to the Corporate Secretary of Ocean Shore at 1001 Asbury Avenue, Ocean City, New Jersey 08226 (i)Capital Bank a written notice of revocation or (ii) a duly executed proxy card relatingyour intention to the same shares, bearing a date later than the proxy card previously executed.vote in person.

Attendance at the Ocean Shore special meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy.

If you choose to send a completed proxy card bearing a later date than your original proxy card, the new proxy card must be received before the beginning of the Ocean Shore special meeting. If you have instructed a bank, broker or other nominee to vote your shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, you must follow the directions you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee in order to change or revoke your vote.

Solicitation of Proxies

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will pay for the solicitation of proxies from the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, Regan & Associates, Inc., Ocean Shore’sLaurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC, Capital Bank’s proxy solicitor, will assist Ocean ShoreCapital Bank in soliciting proxies from the Ocean Shoreits stockholders. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has agreed to pay $9,000,$6,500, plus reasonable expenses not to exceed $1,500 without the consent of Capital Bank, for these services. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. Additionally, directors, officers and employees of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank may solicit proxies personally and by telephone. None of these persons will receive additional or special compensation for soliciting proxies.

Attending the Ocean Shore Special Meeting

All Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders, including holders of record and Ocean Shore stockholders who hold their shares through banks, brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, are invited to attend the Ocean Shore special meeting. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders of record can vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting. If you are not an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder of record, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from the record holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, to be able to vote in person at the Ocean Shore special meeting. If you plan to attend the Ocean Shore special meeting, you must hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from the record holder of your shares confirming your ownership. In addition, you must bring a form of personal photo identification with you in order to be admitted. Ocean Shore reserves the right to refuse admittance to anyone without proper proof of share ownership and without proper photo identification. The use of cameras, sound recording equipment, communications devices or any similar equipment during the Ocean Shore special meeting is prohibited without Ocean Shore’s express written consent.

Delivery of Proxy Materials to Ocean Shore Stockholders Sharing an Address

As permitted by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (which we refer to as the “Exchange Act”), only one copy of this joint proxy statement/prospectus is being delivered to multiple Ocean Shore stockholders sharing an address unless Ocean Shore has previously received contrary instructions from one or more such stockholders. This is referred to as “householding.” Ocean Shore stockholders who hold their shares in “street name” can request further information on householding through their banks, brokers or other holders of record. On written or oral request to Ocean Shore’s proxy solicitor, Regan & Associates, at the following address 505 Eight Avenue, Suite 800, New York, New York, 10018, or by telephone at (800) 737-3246, Ocean Shore will promptly deliver a separate copy of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.prohibited.

Assistance

If you need assistance in completing your proxy card, have questions regarding Ocean Shore’sthe special meeting or would like additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, please contact Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s proxy solicitor, Regan & Associates,Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC, at the following address, 505 Eight Avenue,2 Robbins Lane, Suite 800,201, Jericho, New York New York, 10018,11753, or by telephone at (800) 737-3246.(516)396-7939.

OCEAN SHORECAPITAL BANK PROPOSALS

Proposal No. 1 Ocean Shore— The Merger Proposal

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank is asking its stockholders to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the first-step merger. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders should read this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in its entirety, including the annexes, for more detailed information concerning the merger agreement and the Transactions.merger. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex A.

After careful consideration, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board unanimously approved the merger agreement and the merger, having determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the first-step merger were advisable and in the best interests of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and the Ocean Shoreits stockholders. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The TransactionsMerger — Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Reasons for the Transactions;Merger; Recommendation of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Board” beginning on page 54[●] for a more detailed discussion of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board’s recommendation.

The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger proposal.

Proposal No. 2 Ocean Shore Merger-Related Compensation Proposal

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Rule 14a-21(c) of the Exchange Act, Ocean Shore is seeking non-binding, advisory stockholder approval of the compensation of Ocean Shore’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the first-step merger, as disclosed in “The Transactions Interests of Ocean Shore Directors and Executive Officers in the Transactions —Quantification of Payments and Benefits to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 90. The proposal gives Ocean Shore stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the merger-related compensation of Ocean Shore’s named executive officers. Accordingly, Ocean Shore is requesting that stockholders adopt the following resolution, on a non-binding, advisory basis:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Ocean Shore’s named executive officers in connection with the first-step merger and the agreements or understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid or become payable, in each case as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K in “The Transactions — Interests of Ocean Shore Directors and Executive Officers in the Transactions —Merger-Related Executive Compensation for Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers,” is hereby APPROVED.”

Approval of this proposal is not a condition to completion of the integrated mergers, and the vote with respect to this proposal is advisory only and will not be binding on Ocean Shore or OceanFirst. If the first-step merger is completed, the merger-related compensation may be paid to Ocean Shore’s named executive officers to the extent payable in accordance with the terms of the compensation agreements and arrangements even if Ocean Shore stockholders fail to approve the advisory vote regarding merger-related compensation.

The Ocean Shore board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR,” on an advisory basis, the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal.

Proposal No. 3 Ocean Shore Adjournment Proposal

The Ocean Shore special meeting may be adjourned to another time or place, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Ocean Shore special meeting to approve the Ocean Shore merger proposal.

If, at the Ocean Shore special meeting, the number of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock present or represented by proxy and voting in favor of the Ocean Shore merger proposal is insufficient to approve the

Ocean Shore merger proposal, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank intends to move to adjourn the Ocean Shore special meeting in order to enable the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board to solicit additional proxies for approval of the Ocean Shore merger proposal. In that event, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will ask its stockholders to vote upon the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal, but not the Ocean Shore merger proposal or the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal.

In this proposal, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank is asking its stockholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board on a discretionary basis to vote in favor of adjourning the Ocean Shore special meeting to another time and place for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders who have previously voted.

The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal.

THE OCEANFIRST SPECIAL MEETING

This section contains information for OceanFirst stockholders about the OceanFirst special meeting that OceanFirst has called to allow its stockholders to consider and vote on the OceanFirst share issuance proposal and the OceanFirst adjournment proposal. OceanFirst is mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to you, as an OceanFirst stockholder, on or about [], 2016. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is accompanied by a notice of the OceanFirst special meeting and a form of proxy card that the OceanFirst board is soliciting for use at the OceanFirst special meeting and at any adjournments or postponements of the OceanFirst special meeting.

Date, Time and Place of the OceanFirst Special Meeting

The OceanFirst special meeting will be held at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753, at 5:30 p.m. local time, on November 22, 2016. On or about [●], 2016, OceanFirst commenced mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed form of proxy card to its stockholders entitled to vote at the OceanFirst special meeting.

Matters to Be Considered

At the OceanFirst special meeting, you, as an OceanFirst stockholder, will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:

the OceanFirst share issuance proposal; and

the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

Recommendation of the OceanFirst Board

The OceanFirst board has unanimously approved the merger agreement and unanimously recommends that OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuance proposal and “FOR” the OceanFirst adjournment proposal. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Transactions —OceanFirst’s Reasons for the Transactions; Recommendation of the OceanFirst Board” beginning on page 73 for a more detailed discussion of the OceanFirst board’s recommendation.

OceanFirst Record Date and Quorum

The OceanFirst board has fixed the close of business on September 27, 2016 as the OceanFirst record date for determining the OceanFirst stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the OceanFirst special meeting.

As of the OceanFirst record date, there were 25,850,956 shares of OceanFirst common stock outstanding and entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the OceanFirst special meeting held by approximately 1,679 holders of record. Subject to the ten percent voting limitation set forth in OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation, each share of OceanFirst common stock entitles the holder to one vote at the OceanFirst special meeting on each proposal to be considered at the OceanFirst special meeting.

The presence at the OceanFirst special meeting, in person or by proxy, of holders representing at least a majority of the outstanding shares of OceanFirst common stock entitled to be voted at the OceanFirst special meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the OceanFirst special meeting. Once a share is represented for any purpose at the OceanFirst special meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the OceanFirst special meeting or for any adjournment(s) thereof. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be included in determining the number of shares present at the meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Required Vote; Treatment of Abstentions, Broker Non-Votes and Failure to Vote

OceanFirst share issuance proposal:

Standard: Approval of the OceanFirst share issuance proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by the holders of OceanFirst’s voting common stock at the OceanFirst special meeting.

Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the OceanFirst share issuance proposal, it will have no effect on the OceanFirst share issuance proposal.

OceanFirst adjournment proposal:

Standard: The OceanFirst adjournment proposal will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by the holders of OceanFirst’s voting common stock at the OceanFirst special meeting are voted in favor of the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes: If you mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy, fail to submit a proxy or fail to vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to the OceanFirst adjournment proposal, it will have no effect on the proposal.

Shares Held by Officers, Directors and Certain Stockholders

As of the OceanFirst record date, there were 25,850,956 shares of OceanFirst common stock outstanding, held by 1,679 holders of record. As of the OceanFirst record date, the directors and executive officers of OceanFirst and their affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote approximately 1,097,243 shares of OceanFirst common stock representing approximately 4.2% of the shares of OceanFirst common stock outstanding on that date.

As of the OceanFirst record date, Ocean Shore did not beneficially hold any shares of OceanFirst common stock.

Voting of Proxies; Incomplete Proxies

Any OceanFirst stockholder may vote by proxy or in person at the OceanFirst special meeting. If you hold your shares of OceanFirst common stock in your name as a stockholder of record, to submit a proxy, you, as an OceanFirst stockholder, must complete and return the proxy card in the enclosed envelope. The envelope requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States.

OceanFirst requests that OceanFirst stockholders vote by completing and signing the accompanying proxy card and returning it to OceanFirst as soon as possible in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. When the accompanying proxy card is returned properly executed, the shares of OceanFirst common stock represented by it will be voted at the OceanFirst special meeting in accordance with the instructions contained on the proxy card. If any proxy card is returned without indication as to how to vote, the shares of OceanFirst common stock represented by the proxy card will be voted as recommended by the OceanFirst board.

If an OceanFirst stockholder’s shares are held in “street name” by a broker, bank or other nominee, the stockholder should check with the voting form used by that firm for directions on how to provide such firm with voting instructions.

Every OceanFirst stockholder’s vote is important. Accordingly, each OceanFirst stockholder should sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card, whether or not the OceanFirst stockholder plans to attend the OceanFirst special meeting in person. Sending in your proxy card will not prevent you from voting your shares personally at the meeting, since you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted.

Shares Held in “Street Name”

Under NASDAQ rules, banks, brokers and other nominees who hold shares of OceanFirst common stock in “street name” for a beneficial owner of those shares typically have the authority to vote in their discretion on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, banks, brokers and other nominees are not allowed to exercise their voting discretion with respect to the approval of matters determined to be “non-routine,” without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker non-votes are shares held by a broker, bank or other nominee that are represented at the OceanFirst special meeting, but with respect to which the broker, bank or nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner of such shares to vote on the particular proposal and the broker, bank or nominee does not have discretionary voting power on such proposal. If your broker, bank or other nominee holds your shares of OceanFirst common stock in “street name,” your broker, bank or other nominee will vote your shares of OceanFirst common stock only if you provide instructions on how to vote by completing the voter instruction form sent to you by your broker, bank or other nominee.

Revocability of Proxies and Changes to an OceanFirst Stockholder’s Vote

You have the power to change your vote at any time before your shares of OceanFirst common stock are voted at the OceanFirst special meeting by:

attending and voting in person at the OceanFirst special meeting;

giving notice of revocation of the proxy at the OceanFirst special meeting; or

delivering to the Corporate Secretary of OceanFirst at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753 (i) a written notice of revocation or (ii) a duly executed proxy card relating to the same shares, bearing a date later than the proxy card previously executed.

Attendance at the OceanFirst special meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy.

If you choose to send a completed proxy card bearing a later date than your original proxy card, the new proxy card must be received before the beginning of the OceanFirst special meeting. If you have instructed a bank, broker or other nominee to vote your shares of OceanFirst common stock, you must follow the directions you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee in order to change or revoke your vote.

Solicitation of Proxies

OceanFirst will pay for the solicitation of proxies from the OceanFirst stockholders. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, Georgeson LLC, OceanFirst’s proxy solicitor, will assist OceanFirst in soliciting proxies from the OceanFirst stockholders. OceanFirst has agreed to pay $8,000, plus expenses, for these services. OceanFirst will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. Additionally, directors, officers and employees of OceanFirst may solicit proxies personally and by telephone. None of these persons will receive additional or special compensation for soliciting proxies.

Attending the OceanFirst Special Meeting

All OceanFirst stockholders, including holders of record and OceanFirst stockholders who hold their shares through banks, brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, are invited to attend the OceanFirst special meeting. OceanFirst stockholders of record can vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting. If you are not an OceanFirst stockholder of record, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from the record holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, to be able to vote in person at the OceanFirst special meeting. If you plan to attend the OceanFirst special meeting, you must hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from the record holder of your shares confirming your ownership. In addition, you must bring a

form of personal photo identification with you in order to be admitted. OceanFirst reserves the right to refuse admittance to anyone without proper proof of share ownership and without proper photo identification. The use of cameras, sound recording equipment, communications devices or any similar equipment during the OceanFirst special meeting is prohibited without OceanFirst’s express written consent.

Delivery of Proxy Materials to OceanFirst Stockholders Sharing an Address

As permitted by the Exchange Act, only one copy of this joint proxy statement/prospectus is being delivered to multiple OceanFirst stockholders sharing an address unless OceanFirst has previously received contrary instructions from one or more such stockholders. This is referred to as “householding.” OceanFirst stockholders who hold their shares in “street name” can request further information on householding through their banks, brokers or other holders of record. On written or oral request to Investor Relations at (732) 240-4500 or OceanFirst’s proxy solicitor, Georgeson LLC, at (866) 296-5716, OceanFirst will deliver promptly a separate copy of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.

Assistance

If you need assistance in completing your proxy card, have questions regarding OceanFirst’s special meeting or would like additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, please contact Investor Relations at the following address 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753 or by telephone at (732) 240-4500, or OceanFirst’s proxy solicitor, Georgeson LLC, at the following address or phone number: 1290 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10104, (866) 296-5716.

OCEANFIRST PROPOSALS

Proposal No. 1 OceanFirst Share Issuance Proposal

OceanFirst is asking its stockholders to approve the OceanFirst share issuance. OceanFirst stockholders should read this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in its entirety, including the annexes, for more detailed information concerning the merger agreement, the Transactions and the OceanFirst share issuance. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex A.

After careful consideration, the OceanFirst board unanimously approved the merger agreement. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Transactions — OceanFirst’s Reasons for the Transactions; Recommendation of the OceanFirst Board” beginning on page 73 for a more detailed discussion of the OceanFirst board’s recommendation.

The OceanFirst board unanimously recommends that OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuance proposal.

Proposal No. 2 OceanFirst Adjournment Proposal

The OceanFirst special meeting may be adjourned to another time or place, if necessary or appropriate, to permit, among other things, further solicitation of proxies as necessary to obtain additional votes in favor of the OceanFirst share issuance proposal.

If, at the OceanFirst special meeting, the number of shares of OceanFirst common stock present or represented by proxy and voting in favor of the OceanFirst share issuance proposal is insufficient to approve the OceanFirst share issuance proposal, OceanFirst intends to move to adjourn the OceanFirst special meeting in order to enable the OceanFirst board to solicit additional proxies for approval of the Ocean Shore share issuance proposal. In that event, OceanFirst will ask its stockholders to vote upon the OceanFirst adjournment proposal, but not the OceanFirst share issuance proposal.

In this proposal, OceanFirst is asking its stockholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the OceanFirst board on a discretionary basis to vote in favor of adjourning the OceanFirst special meeting to another time and place for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from OceanFirst stockholders who have previously voted.

The OceanFirst board unanimously recommends that OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

INFORMATION ABOUT OCEANFIRST AND OCEANFIRST BANK

OceanFirst is incorporated under Delaware law and serves as the holding company for OceanFirst Bank. OceanFirst common stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OCFC.” OceanFirst Bank, founded in 1902, is a community$7.6 billion regional bank with $4.0 billion in assetsoperating throughout New Jersey, metropolitan Philadelphia and 50 branches located throughout Central and Southernmetropolitan New Jersey.York City. OceanFirst Bank delivers commercial and residential financing solutions, wealth management and deposit services throughout the central New Jersey region and is one of the largest and oldest community-based financial institutioninstitutions headquartered in Ocean County, New Jersey. OceanFirst’s website is www.oceanfirstonline.com.

On May 2, 2016, OceanFirst completed the Cape acquisition. Total consideration paid for the Cape acquisition was $196.4 million. On November 30, 2016, OceanFirst completed the Ocean Shore acquisition. Total consideration paid for the Ocean Shore acquisition was $180.7 million. On January 31, 2018, OceanFirst completed the Sun acquisition. Total consideration paid for the Sun acquisition was $474.9 million.

OceanFirst common stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OCFC.”

OceanFirst’sBank’s principal executive office is located at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River,110 West Front Street, Red Bank, New Jersey 0875307701 and its telephone number at that location is (732)240-4500. OceanFirst’s website is www.oceanfirst.com. Additional information about OceanFirst Bank and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[●].

INFORMATION ABOUT MERGER SUBCAPITAL BANK

Merger SubCapital Bank is a New Jersey corporationstate chartered commercial bank that opened for business in 2007. Capital Bank offers an array of personal and commercial banking products, including savings and checking accounts, certificates of deposit, and business and consumer loans. As of September 30, 2018, Capital Bank had $495.3 million in total assets, $446.2 million in deposits and $46.1 million of stockholders’ equity. Capital Bank has five locations in New Jersey – two in Vineland (Cumberland County), one in Woodbury Heights (Gloucester County), one in Hammonton (Atlantic County), and a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst. Merger Sub was formed by OceanFirst for the sole purpose of consummating the integrated mergers.

loan production office in Marlton (Burlington County).

INFORMATION ABOUT OCEAN SHORE

Ocean Shore is the holding company for Ocean Shore Bank. Founded in 1887, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank operates 11 branch offices throughout Cape May and Atlantic Counties in New Jersey. Ocean Shore Bank places a strong emphasis on obtaining deposits by offering checking account products and services for consumers, businesses, municipalities and local boards of education. Additionally, Ocean Shore Bank provides savings accounts designed to fit any need. Ocean Shore Bank also provides a full menu of residential, consumer and commercial lending options. The goal at Ocean Shore Bank is to develop a strong relationship with customers by continually offering innovative products and services that will fill all their financial needs. Ocean Shore Bank’s website is www.ochome.com.

Ocean Shore common stock is traded on the NASDAQOTC Pink under the symbol “OSHC.“CANJ.

Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s principal executive offices are located at 1001 Asbury Avenue, Ocean City,175 South Main Road, Vineland, New Jersey 0822608360 and its telephone number at that location is (609) 399-0012. Additional information about Ocean Shore and its subsidiaries(856)690-1234. Capital Bank’s website is included in documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.www.cbnj.bank.

THE TRANSACTIONSMERGER

The following discussion contains certain information about the Transactions.merger. The discussion is subject, and qualified in its entirety by reference, to the merger agreement attached asAnnex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated herein by reference. We urge you to read carefully this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the merger agreement attached asAnnex A, for a more complete understanding of the Transactions.merger.

Structure of the TransactionsMerger

Each of the OceanFirst board and the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board has unanimously approved the merger agreement. The merger agreement provides that (i) Merger Sub will merge with and into Ocean Shore, with Ocean Shore continuing as the surviving corporation in the first-step merger and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst, (ii) immediately following the first-step merger, Ocean Shore will merge with and into OceanFirst, with OceanFirst continuing as the surviving corporation in the second-step merger and (iii) immediately following the completion of the integrated mergers, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will merge with and into OceanFirst Bank, with OceanFirst Bank beingcontinuing as the surviving entitybank in the bank merger.merger and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst.

At the effective time, of the first-step merger, each issued and outstanding share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, except for certain specified shares owned by OceanFirst, Capital Bank or Ocean Shore,stockholders who have properly exercised dissenters’ rights, will be converted into the right to receive the per share cash consideration of $4.35, without interest, and 0.96671.25 shares of OceanFirst common stock, together with cash in lieu of fractional shares. No fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock will be issued in connection with the first-step merger, and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders will instead be entitled to receive cash in lieu thereof.

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders are being asked to approve the merger agreement and the first-step merger. OceanFirst stockholders are being asked to approve the OceanFirst share issuance. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger Agreement” beginning on page 95[•] for additional and more detailed information regarding the legal documents that govern the Transactions,merger, including information about the conditions to the completion of the integrated mergersmerger and the provisions for terminating or amending the merger agreement.

Background of the TransactionsMerger

The Ocean ShoreAs part of its ongoing consideration of Capital Bank’s long-term prospects and strategies, the Capital Bank board has regularly reviewed and discussed Ocean Shore’s business strategy, performance and prospects in the context of the national and local economic environment, developments in the regulation of financial institutions and the competitive landscape. Among other things, these reviews and discussions have included possibleconsidered various strategic alternatives, available to Ocean Shore, such as capital management strategiesincluding opportunities for organic growth and potential acquisitions orand merger transactions. The Capital Bank board has considered strategic options potentially available to Capital Bank with the goal of enhancing and focusing on value for its stockholders, serving its customers and community and providing for its employees.

Since being established in 2007, Capital Bank has grown to approximately $495.3 million in assets as of September 30, 2018. The Capital Bank board believes that Capital Bank needs to continue to grow in order to operate most efficiently, absorb the increasing costs of operating Capital Bank and become more profitable. Like many community banks, Capital Bank has incurred increasing costs in complying with new banking laws, regulations and policies, in addition to changes in technology that affect the way customers conduct banking business, as well as the difficulty of operating in a sustained low interest rate environment. The Capital Bank board and Capital Bank’s management have considered from time to time both organic growth strategies and business combinations involvingwith other financial institutions. These reviewsinstitutions as a means of absorbing such higher operating costs by achieving greater economies of scale.

In 2017, Capital Bank engaged a financial advisor to explore potential strategic business combination transactions. During that process, Capital Bank and discussions also included a review ofits financial advisor at the merger and acquisition environment,time contacted 16 potential transaction partners, including multiples and premiums being paid, and an assessment of potential partners for Ocean Shore. In connection with the evaluation of these strategic alternatives, Steven E. Brady,OceanFirst. Christopher D. Maher, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ocean Shore, has had, from time to time,OceanFirst, informally discussed with Capital Bank’s financial advisor the possibility of a strategic acquisition by OceanFirst of Capital Bank. However, these informal discussions with representativesdid not result in more formal discussions or proposals. Following the termination of other financial institutionsthese discussions in May 2017, OceanFirst and has regularly updatedCapital Bank did not have any further discussions regarding a potential strategic transaction until June 2018.

Based on the Ocean Shore board regarding such discussions.level of interest received from potential acquirers during the 2017 process, Capital Bank determined that a sale of Capital Bank was not in the best interest of the bank or its stockholders at that time.

In June 2014, Mr. Brady metMay 2018, the Capital Bank board once again discussed Capital Bank’s strategic direction and decided to invite representatives from the investment banking firm Boenning to meet with the Capital Bank board to discuss market conditions and strategic options. The Capital Bank board also discussed potential merger partners, and directed David J. Hanrahan, Sr., President and Chief Executive Officer of another financial institution (which we referCapital Bank, to as “Company A”), who expressed an interest incontact Mr. Maher and request a possible business combination with Ocean Shore. In August 2014, at the request of Christopher D. Maher, the then Presidentmeeting. Mr. Hanrahan did so, and, Chief Operating Officer of OceanFirst, Mr. Bradyon June 8, 2018, he met with Mr. Maher, who also expressed an interest in discussing a business combination. These discussions between Ocean Shore and each of Company A and OceanFirst were preliminary in nature, focusing on the banking industry, the New Jersey banking market, their respective companies’ business models and strategies, and the potential operational and cultural fit between Ocean Shore and their respective companies.

No specific terms of a business combination were discussed and no confidential information was exchanged.Maher. At such meeting, Mr. Brady updated the Ocean Shore board regarding his discussions with the Chief Executive Officer of Company A and Mr. Maher following those discussions.

At its annual review of strategic alternatives in October 2014, which was attended by representatives of Sandler O’Neill and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP (which we referHanrahan inquired as to as “Kilpatrick Townsend”), legal advisor to Ocean Shore, the Ocean Shore board discussed the possibility of a business combination with each of Company A and OceanFirst, as well as another financial institution (which we refer to as “Company B”). The Ocean Shore board also discussed other companies that might have the interest in, and financial capacity for, a business combination with Ocean Shore. However, after considering timing considerations affecting two of the potential partners, the negative economic developments in Atlantic City and Ocean Shore’s business and capital management initiatives, the Ocean Shore board concluded that Ocean Shore’s stockholders would be better served by deferring pursuit of a business combination. However, the Ocean Shore board instructed Mr. Brady to continue his dialogue with both OceanFirst and Company A, as well as with other potential parties that might express interest, either directly or through Sandler O’Neill.

In January 2015, Mr. Maher became the Chief Executive Officer of OceanFirst.

In March 2015, Mr. Brady met with the President and Chief Executive Officer of Company A, who reiterated Company A’s interest in a possible business combination with Ocean Shore. This discussion focused on the rationale for the transaction and operational synergies and integration. No specific terms of a business combination were discussed.

In May 2015, Mr. Brady met with Mr. Maher, who also reiterated OceanFirst’s interest in a possible business combination with Ocean Shore. This discussion also focused on the rationale for the transactionstrategic acquisition by OceanFirst of Capital Bank, and operational synergies and integration. No specific terms of a business combination were discussed.Mr. Maher indicated that OceanFirst might be interested in acquiring Capital Bank.

At its regular meeting held in May 2015, which was attended byOn June 21, 2018, representatives of Sandler O’Neill and Kilpatrick Townsend,Boenning made a presentation to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board in which Boenning discussed theCapital Bank, its current operating environment, recent merger and acquisition market,activity and trends, Capital Bank’s stock valuation expectations,considerations and potentialprospective transaction partners. During Boenning’s discussion of prospective transaction partners, for a business combination. The Ocean Shore board also continued its prior discussions of strategic alternatives and concluded that pursuit of a business combination likely would achieve a greater value for stockholders than pursuing other stand-alone options, but that the timing of such a transaction should be carefully considered to achieve the best transaction for Ocean Shore’s stockholders. The Ocean Shore board considered OceanFirst and Company A to have the greatestBoenning rated highly OceanFirst’s perceived interest in a business combination with Ocean Shore. The Ocean Shore board also identified Company B and a small number of other companies as potentially having an interest in and ability to completepay a transactionpurchase price that would be attractive to the Capital Bank board and Capital Bank stockholders. Mr. Hanrahan also informed the Capital Bank board of the details of his June 8 meeting with Ocean Shore, but viewed them as less likelyMr. Maher. The Capital Bank board instructed Mr. Hanrahan to pursue a transaction with Ocean Shore because, among other reasons, Ocean Shore was too small relative to those banks, not located in a geographic priority and/or did not possess the right business focus. Following its discussion, the Ocean Shore board authorized Mr. Brady to continue to engage in exploratory discussionsfollow up with Mr. Maher and the Chief Executive Officer of Company A, and to assess each party’s willingness and ability, from a timing perspective, to evaluate a potential transaction with Ocean Shore. The Ocean Shore board also instructed management to continue discussions.

Mr. Hanrahan then set up a meeting with Mr. Maher for July 17, 2018. Prior to evaluate otherthat meeting, Boenning provided Mr. Hanrahan with a more detailed analysis of OceanFirst’s ability to pay an attractive purchase price for Capital Bank, prior merger transaction history and terms and stock analysts’ opinions of OceanFirst common stock. On July 17, 2018, Messrs. Hanrahan and Maher met and discussed a possible merger and potential terms, as well as Capital Bank’s operating performance. Mr. Maher also offered to meet with the Capital Bank board to discuss the proposed merger further. After the meeting, Mr. Hanrahan supplied Mr. Maher with certain requested information to enable OceanFirst to establish a proposed purchase price per share of Capital Bank common stock. On July 18, 2018, Mr. Maher responded that, preliminarily and capital management strategiessubject to best position Ocean Shoredue diligence, OceanFirst would be willing to achievepay up to $35.00 per share of Capital Bank common stock. Based on the highest possible value in any eventual transaction.closing price for OceanFirst common stock on July 18, 2018 of $29.90, that would have implied a merger exchange ratio of approximately 1.17 shares of OceanFirst common stock for each share of Capital Bank common stock.

At itsa regular meeting of the Capital Bank board held on July 21, 2015, the Ocean Shore board retained Sandler O’Neill as its financial advisor to assist the Ocean Shore board in evaluating a potential business combination based on, among other factors, Sandler O’Neill’s reputation, experience in mergers and acquisitions, and familiarity with Ocean Shore and Ocean Shore’s strategic goals and the industry in which it operates. In making its selection of Sandler O’Neill, the Ocean Shore board also considered Sandler O’Neill’s previous disclosures to the Ocean Shore board that Sandler O’Neill maintained investment banking relationships with OceanFirst, Company A and Company B, as well as many of the other parties considered as potential partners for Ocean Shore.

Over the following months,19, 2018, Mr. Brady had additional exploratory discussions with Mr. Maher and the Chief Executive Officer of Company A and reported on those discussions to the Ocean Shore board. Specific terms of a business combination were not discussed, and no confidential information was exchanged. Mr. Brady and Mr. Maher also discussed Mr. Brady’s possible role with the combined company, as well as the possibility of certain executive officers of Ocean Shore continuing with OceanFirst following the proposed transaction in light of their significant experience and knowledge of the Southern New Jersey banking market.

At its annual strategic planning session held in October 2015, the Ocean Shore board evaluated potential business combinations with OceanFirst and Company A. The Ocean Shore board also discussed the merits of a potential merger of equals with another community banking institution whose President and Chief Executive Officer had recently contacted Mr. Brady, but determined not to pursue such a transaction because it was unlikely to provide a significant market premium to Ocean Shore stockholders. The Ocean Shore board also considered whether other companies might have an interest in a business combination with Ocean Shore and noted that several companies previously thought to be possible partners for a business combination had themselves been acquired, were understood based on conversations with Sandler O’Neill to lack an interest in Ocean Shore’s southern New Jersey markets, lacked the financial capacity to offer a competitive price to acquire Ocean Shore, or had regulatory or other issues that precluded them from engaging in acquisitions at that time. The Ocean Shore board determined that pursuit of a business combination likely would achieve a greater value for Ocean Shore’s stockholders, and that the best timing for moving forward with exploring such a transaction likely would be in the first quarter of 2016.

In January 2016, after OceanFirst announced that it had entered into an agreement and plan of merger providing for the Cape acquisition, Mr. Maher contacted Mr. Brady to reiterate OceanFirst’s interest in a business combination with Ocean Shore.

At its regular meeting on January 20, 2016, which was also attended by representatives of Sandler O’Neill and a representative of Kilpatrick Townsend, Mr. BradyHanrahan updated the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board on his discussions with Mr. Maher. The Capital Bank board authorized Mr. Hanrahan to indicate to OceanFirst that Capital Bank was interested in OceanFirst’s proposal and to arrange for the Capital Bank board to meet with OceanFirst representatives to further discuss the proposal. The Capital Bank board also authorized Mr. Hanrahan to negotiate with Boenning the terms of its engagement as Capital Bank’s financial advisor for the merger. After the Capital Bank board meeting, Mr. Hanrahan notified Mr. Maher accordingly.

On August 7, 2018, the Capital Bank board met with Mr. Maher and other representatives of OceanFirst to discuss a possible merger transaction. After the Chief Executive Officer of Company A. Sandler O’Neill disclosed tomeeting, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board that its investment banking division had provided financial advisory services to OceanFirst in connection with OceanFirst’s acquisition of Cape. A representative of Kilpatrick Townsend discussed the Ocean Shore board’s fiduciary duties in connection with the process for soliciting indicationsproposed merger and directed Mr. Hanrahan to request a written indication of interest from OceanFirst. On August 8, 2018, Mr. Hanrahan contacted Mr. Maher to make such a request and to request information regarding OceanFirst’s human resources policies and practices.

On August 13, 2018, OceanFirst provided Capital Bank a writtennon-binding indication of interest with an indicative purchase price of $35.00 per share of Capital Bank common stock, resulting in an aggregate deal value of $89.3 million (including the cash out of options), subject to confirmatory due diligence. Based on the closing price for OceanFirst common stock on August 13, 2018 of $28.63, that would have implied a business combination.merger exchange ratio of approximately 1.22 shares of OceanFirst common stock for each share of Capital Bank common stock. In the potential transaction, OceanFirst Bank would merge with Capital Bank in a 100% stock transaction in which OceanFirst Bank would be the surviving institution. Thenon-binding indication of interest also requested a45-day exclusivity period to conduct further due diligence and continue confidential discussions.

At its regular meeting on February 17, 2016, which was alsoOn August 16, 2018, the Capital Bank board met, attended by representatives of Sandler O’NeillBoenning and Capital Bank’s legal counsel, Stevens & Lee, to review OceanFirst’s indication of interest. At this meeting, Boenning reviewed

with the Capital Bank board the terms of OceanFirst’s indication of interest and presented an overview of OceanFirst, including a summary of its historical financial performance, a comparison of its branch network to Capital Bank’s, recent stock trading information and a representativepeer group analysis. A potential timeline of Kilpatrick Townsend, representativesevents was also discussed assuming Capital Bank were to enter into negotiations with OceanFirst. The Capital Bank board considered that the combination could create desirable scale, as an institution with combined assets of Sandler O’Neill providedover $8.2 billion, and an update onimproved earnings profile. The Capital Bank board also considered the mergersrecent growth and acquisitions market, reviewed withfinancial performance of OceanFirst. Other advantages considered by the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board OceanFirst’sincluded a substantially increased legal lending capacity for Capital Bank to accommodate its customer base, and Company A’s business, performance and valuation metrics, and discussed pro forma analyses of combinations with OceanFirst and Company A. The Ocean Shore board continued the discussion from prior board meetings regarding other potential merger partners andgreater opportunities to serve its view that no other company with the ability to complete a transaction was likely to be interested in Ocean Shore’s southern New Jersey market areacommunities. Based on OceanFirst’s indication of interest, the Capital Bank board authorized its officers to allow representatives of OceanFirst to conduct further due diligence on Capital Bank, to conduct reverse due diligence on OceanFirst and that communication with a broader group of companies risked premature disclosure of Ocean Shore’s considerationto negotiate the terms of a business combination, which could disrupt Ocean Shore’s relationships with customers and employees. Following these discussions,binding definitive agreement covering the Ocean Shore board authorized Sandler O’Neill to solicit initial indicationstransaction set forth in the indication of interest with respect to a potential transaction from OceanFirst and Company A.interest. The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board also authorized Sandler O’Neill to continue to assess potential interest of Company B and other market participants in possibly acquiring Ocean Shore.

In early April 2016,entering into an agreement with OceanFirst and Company A executed nondisclosure agreements and received a confidential information memorandum regarding the potential acquisition of Ocean Shore. In consultation with the Ocean Shore board, representatives of Sandler O’Neill requested that OceanFirst and Company A submit indication of interest letters regarding a proposed business combination with Ocean Shore by April 26, 2016.

At the regular meeting of the Ocean Shore board held on April 20, 2016, a representative of Sandler O’Neill informed the directors that, in the course of Sandler O’Neill’s regular communications with a financial institution

previously considered as possibly having an interest in a business combination with Ocean Shore, Sandler O’Neill had confirmed that such financial institution did not have an interest in a business combination with Ocean Shore at this time.

On April 26, 2016, Ocean Shore received nonbinding preliminary indication of interest letters from OceanFirst and Company A. OceanFirst’s letter reflected consideration of $21.00 per share of Ocean Shore common stock, consisting of 80% stock consideration and 20% cash consideration, with the exchange ratioproviding for the stock portion of the consideration to be fixed upon execution of the definitive merger agreement. OceanFirst’s proposal indicated a willingness to expand the OceanFirst board to accommodate representation of Ocean Shore stockholders by current Ocean Shore directors, but did not specify the number of directors that would be added to the OceanFirst board. OceanFirst also indicated that it was prepared to commence due diligence with the goal of executing a definitive agreement in June or July of 2016. Company A’s nonbinding preliminary indication of interest letter reflected a range of consideration, from $20.83 to $21.67, consisting of 65% stock consideration and 35% cash consideration, with the exchange ratio for the stock portion of the consideration to be fixed upon execution of the definitive merger agreement. Company A’s proposal indicated that Company A would inviterequested45-day exclusivity period. Additionally, on August 16, 2018, Mr. Brady to join its board of directors. Company A also indicated that it wished to commence due diligence in October and execute a definitive merger agreement in late 2016 or early 2017.

On May 3, 2016, the Ocean Shore board held a special meeting, attended by representatives of Sandler O’Neill and Kilpatrick Townsend, to review the nonbinding preliminary indications of interest. After detailed discussion of the terms of each proposal and the factors influencing Company A’s desire to delay the commencement of due diligence until October, the Ocean Shore board instructed Sandler O’Neill to provide access to each party to an electronic data room that contained extensive information with respect to Ocean Shore’s assets and operations. The Ocean Shore board also instructed Sandler O’Neill to request that OceanFirst clarify and improve its offer and to encourage Company A to clarify and improve its offering range and accelerate the timeframes under which it was willing to proceed with due diligence and execution of a definitive agreement. Both parties were asked to submit revised nonbinding indications of interest by May 20, 2016.

On May 11, 2016, Mr. BradyHanrahan requested, and Mr. Maher metagreed to, discuss operational matters with respect to the combination of their respective companies, should a business combination transaction be consummated. Mr. Brady and Mr. Maher also discussed Mr. Brady’s possible role with the combined company, as well as the possibility of certain executive officers of Ocean Shore continuingslightly enhanced severance plan for Capital Bank employees who would not continue with OceanFirst following the possible business combination in light of their significant experience and knowledgecompletion of the Southern New Jersey banking market. Mr. Brady and Mr. Maher also discussed potential terms for retention and consulting agreements, as applicable, for Mr. Brady and such executive officers of Ocean Shore.proposed transaction.

On May 12, 2016, while atAugust 17, 2018, Capital Bank entered into a written agreement with Boenning engaging Boenning as Capital Bank’s financial advisor for the merger. Also on August 17, 2018, Capital Bank and OceanFirst entered into an industry conference, Mr. Brady advised a senior officer of Company B that Ocean Shore was considering a business combination. The following day, that executive informed Sandler O’Neill that Company B was not interested in pursuing a business combination with Ocean Shore at this time.

On May 20, 2016, OceanFirst submitted an updated nonbinding indication of interest letter reflecting consideration valued at $21.75 per share, consisting of $4.35 in cash and 0.9576 shares of OceanFirst common stock. OceanFirst’s updated proposal also provided that OceanFirst would invite three of Ocean Shore’s directorsexclusivity agreement (which we refer to joinas the OceanFirst board and that OceanFirst would create an advisory board consisting of four of Ocean Shore’s directors. OceanFirst’s willingness“exclusivity agreement”), pursuant to continue discussions and engage in further due diligence was conditioned on Ocean Shore agreeingwhich Capital Bank agreed to negotiate exclusively with OceanFirst for a45-day period, and the parties agreed to mutual confidentiality andnon-disclosure terms to facilitate the exchange of 45 days. Company A advised Sandler O’Neillinformation in due diligence.

During late August and September 2018, Capital Bank and OceanFirst conducted due diligence on each other, including mutual data room document review by management, financial advisors and legal counsel, an August27-28, 2018off-site credit quality review by OceanFirst management at a location near Capital Bank’s main office, a September 14, 2018 meeting at which OceanFirst management conducted interviews of management of Capital Bank and a September 19, 2018 meeting at OceanFirst’s headquarters during which Capital Bank’s management and financial advisor reviewed documents and conducted interviews of OceanFirst’s management. During these interviews, the parties discussed aspects of each other’s businesses based on their respective reviews of the other party’s documents and files.

On September 20, 2018, Skadden, OceanFirst’s legal counsel, provided a draft merger agreement to Stevens & Lee. In late September and early October, the terms of the merger agreement were negotiated and drafts were exchanged.

On October 2, 2018, Mr. Maher notified Mr. Hanrahan and Capital Bank’s Chairman of the Board, Dominic J. Romano, by telephone that itbecause of the recent reduction in the market price of OceanFirst common stock, which both OceanFirst and Capital Bank understood to be due to a reduction in bank stock prices generally, OceanFirst was unwillingno longer willing to changepay $35.00 per share of Capital Bank common stock in the merger. They discussed different options for dealing with the reduction in OceanFirst’s stock price, including delaying the transaction or fixing the exchange ratio at 1.19 shares of OceanFirst common stock for each share of Capital Bank common stock, which, based on the closing price for OceanFirst common stock on October 1, 2018 of $26.98, would equal a purchase price of approximately $32.11 per share.

On October 4, 2018, after discussing the matter with representatives of Boenning, Mr. Hanrahan contacted Mr. Maher and requested that OceanFirst revise its timeframesindication of interest to reflect a fixed exchange ratio of 1.25 shares of OceanFirst common stock for proceeding as outlined ineach share of Capital Bank stock. After several telephone conversations, on October 6, 2018, OceanFirst agreed to revise its April 26th letter and did not submit an updatedindication of interest to reflect a fixed exchange ratio of 1.25, which, based on the closing price for OceanFirst common stock on October 5, 2018 of $27.08, would equal a purchase price of approximately $33.85.

On October 10, 2018, Capital Bank received a revised nonbinding indication of interest letter.(which included a proposed extension of the term of the exclusivity agreement to October 26, 2018) from OceanFirst stating that in the merger 1.25 shares of OceanFirst common stock would be exchanged for each share of Capital Bank common stock outstanding at the effective time.

On October 11, 2018, the Capital Bank board met in the evening to review the revised indication of interest (including the proposed exclusivity extension discussed above) and the current draft of the merger agreement. Representatives of Boenning and Stevens & Lee participated in the meeting. Representatives of Stevens & Lee reviewed for the Capital Bank board in detail the terms of the merger agreement as had been negotiated to date and the issues that still needed to be resolved. Representatives of Boenning reviewed with the Capital Bank board the status of the merger, the revised terms of OceanFirst’s indication of interest and the revised value of the merger to Capital Bank stockholders, which at that time was worth $33.28 per share based on the closing price for OceanFirst common stock on October 11, 2018 of $26.62. Representatives of Boenning also advised the Capital Bank board that, in its view, the revised offer set forth in the indication of interest was still likely to be in excess of any offer that might be proposed by other potential bidders. The Capital Bank board approved the revised indication of interest and proposed extension of the exclusivity agreement to October 26, 2018. OceanFirst and Capital Bank signed a letter agreement reflecting such matters on October 11, 2018.

Further negotiations regarding the terms of the merger agreement and further due diligence and analyses were conducted by both OceanFirst and Capital Bank during the weeks of October 8 and October 15. During this time, discussions among the parties occurred regarding amendments to Capital Bank’s existing employment agreements with certain officers, given that the parties desired that all such matters be resolved and agreed upon by all parties and affected executives before the execution of the merger agreement. During these two weeks, Stevens & Lee and Skadden completed negotiations of the terms of the merger agreement and all ancillary documents (including the voting and support agreements) and exchanged and negotiated drafts of disclosure schedules with each other.

On October 24, 2018, the OceanFirst board met to discuss the merger. Representatives of Piper Jaffray & Co., OceanFirst’s financial advisor, and Skadden were present at that meeting. After extensive discussions, including a consideration of the factors described in the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “—OceanFirst’s Reasons for the Merger,” the OceanFirst board unanimously approved the merger agreement.

At its regulara meeting heldof the Capital Bank board on MayOctober 25, 2016, which was attended by2018, with representatives of Sandler O’NeillBoenning and Kilpatrick Townsend,Stevens & Lee in attendance, a representative of Stevens & Lee presented the Ocean Shoreterms of the final merger agreement to the Capital Bank board reviewedand described the terms of the proposed transaction reflected in OceanFirst’s updated nonbinding indication of interest letter. A representative of Sandler O’Neill reviewed his

discussions withamendments to the Chief Executive Officer of Company A, who confirmed Company A’s continued interest in a potential transaction but an unwillingness to commence detailed due diligence and negotiations prior to October. Mr. Brady also informed the Ocean Shore board of Company B’s decision not to pursue a business combination with Ocean Shore. After detailed discussion of the transaction terms and structure, financial information regarding OceanFirst and pro forma analyses of the combined company, the Ocean Shore board instructed Sandler O’Neill to inform OceanFirst of Ocean Shore’s willingness to move forward to negotiate a definitive agreement on an exclusive basis, subject to OceanFirst increasing the exchange ratio or agreeing to delay fixing the exchange ratio until execution of the definitive merger agreement.

On May 26, 2016, OceanFirst agreed to increase the exchange ratio to 0.9667,employment agreements between Capital Bank and each of OceanFirstits three executive officers, and Ocean Shore executed a non-binding letter of intent, which included the 45-day exclusivity period discussed above.

On June 14, 2016, OceanFirstvoting and its legal advisor, Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (which we refer to as “Skadden”), provided Ocean Shore and Kilpatrick Townsend with an initial draft merger agreement for the proposed transaction. The draft merger agreement provided for a termination fee equal to 4% of the transaction value, payable by Ocean Shore in certain circumstances, including in the event that the Ocean Shore board of directors changed its recommendation to its stockholders to vote in favor of the transaction. The draft merger agreement also included a provision requiring OceanFirst and Ocean Shore to hold a stockholder meeting even if their respective boards of directors had changed their recommendation to vote in favor of the transaction (which we refer to as a “‘force-the-vote’ provision”).

On June 21, 2016, Kilpatrick Townsend provided to Skadden a revised draft of the merger agreement. This draft proposed that the termination fee be mutual and that Ocean Shore have the ability to terminate the merger agreement based on a decline in the price of OceanFirst common stock, in exchange for accepting OceanFirst’s proposed mutual “force-the-vote” provision.

Over the course of the following weeks, the parties and their respective legal and financial advisors continued to conduct reciprocal due diligence, negotiate and finalize the terms of the proposed transaction and exchange drafts of the merger agreement.

On June 29, 2016, Skadden provided an initial draft of a separation and consulting agreement with respect to Mr. Brady pursuant to which Mr. Brady would terminate employment upon completion of the proposed transaction, receive certain payments and benefits under the terms of his existing compensation and benefit arrangements, provide consulting services for a period of time following termination of employment, and agree to various restrictive covenants, including an agreement not to compete with OceanFirst.

On July 5 and July 7, 2016, Kilpatrick Townsend and Skadden exchanged revised drafts of the separation and consulting agreement between OceanFirst and Mr. Brady. On July 8, 2016, Mr. Brady and Mr. Maher spoke and agreed that it would be more productive to finalize the agreement after announcement of the Transactions.

On July 10, 2016, Skadden provided initial drafts of severance and releasesupport agreements to be entered into with executive officersby the directors and such officers. Such Stevens & Lee representative also explained to the Capital Bank board their fiduciary duties, specifically in the context of Ocean Shore who are parties to “change in control” agreements. The proposed formsa change of agreement with Kim Davidson and Janet Bossi, each Executive Vice President of Ocean Shore, provided that each of them would serve as a Senior Vice President of OceanFirst on an at-will basis following consummation ofcontrol. He also discussed the proposed transaction. No discussions or negotiations regardingresolutions that the drafts of these agreements occurred prior to execution of the merger agreement.

On July 12, 2016, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board held a specialwould approve at this meeting. Members of Ocean Shore management and representatives of Sandler O’Neill and Kilpatrick Townsend were also in attendance at the meeting. The Ocean Shore board had been provided with a set of meeting materials in advance of the meeting, including a summary of the terms and conditions of the merger agreement prepared by Kilpatrick Townsend. A representative of Kilpatrick Townsend reviewedBoenning discussed their financial analyses and fairness opinion regarding the merger agreement and various deal terms with the Ocean Shore board.

Representatives of Sandler O’Neill reviewed with the Ocean Shore board its financial analysis of the Transactions and rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequentlymerger. He also confirmed in writing (a copy of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex C),Boenning’s previous advice to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to the factors, assumptions and limitations set forth in its written opinion,their view, the merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to be received by the holders of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock. Following extensive discussions, including consideration of the factors described under “— Ocean Shore’s Reasons for the Transactions; Recommendation of the Ocean Shore Board,” the Ocean Shore board, having determined thatstock in the merger agreement andwas still likely to be in excess of any offer that might be proposed by other potential bidders. After a discussion with the transactions contemplated thereby were in the best interest of Ocean Shore and its stockholders, unanimously approved the merger agreement and recommended that the Ocean Shore stockholders approve the adoption ofCapital Bank board regarding the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the first-step merger.

Also on July 12, 2016, the OceanFirst board met to discuss the proposed transaction. Representatives of Piper and Skadden were present at that meeting. The OceanFirst board had been provided with a set of meeting materials in advance of the meeting, including a summary of the terms and conditions of the merger agreement prepared by Skadden. Representatives of Piper reviewed with the OceanFirst board its financial analysis of the Transactions and rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing (a copy of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex D), to the OceanFirst board that, as of the date of the opinion, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the merger consideration in the first-step merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to OceanFirst. OceanFirst’s management team reviewed in detail the results of its due diligence investigation of Ocean Shore. A Representative of Skadden reviewed the terms of the proposed merger agreement with the OceanFirst board. After extensive discussions, including a consideration of these presentations and the factors described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “— OceanFirst’sCapital Bank’s Reasons for the Transactions;Merger; Recommendation of the OceanFirstCapital Bank Board,” Boenning rendered its written opinion to the Capital Bank board that the merger consideration to be received by the holders of Capital Bank common stock in connection with the merger was fair to such holders from a financial point of view. The Capital Bank board voted unanimously to approve the merger agreement.

Following the completion of the OceanFirst and Capital Bank board unanimously approvedmeetings, the merger agreement and determined to recommend thatancillary documents were executed and delivered. After the OceanFirst stockholders approveclose of the OceanFirst share issuance.

Following the respective board meetings ofmarket on October 25, 2018, OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, OceanFirst and Ocean Shore executed the merger agreement and the directors of Ocean Shore executed the voting agreements with OceanFirst, and early on July 13, 2016, OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank issued a joint press release announcing the execution of the merger agreement.

Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Reasons for the Transactions;Merger; Recommendation of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Board

After careful consideration, at a meeting held on July 12, 2016,In reaching the Ocean Shore board unanimously determinedconclusion that the merger agreement including the Transactions and the other transactions contemplated thereby, is in the best interests of Ocean Shore and advisable for Capital Bank and its constituents, including its stockholders, and approved the merger agreement.

In reaching its decision to approvein approving the merger agreement, the Transactions and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and to recommend that its stockholders vote “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger proposal, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board consulted with Ocean Shoresenior management, as well as its independentlegal counsel and its financial and legal advisors,advisor, and considered a number of factors including, among others, the following, material factors:which are not presented in order of priority:

 

the business strategy and strategic plan of Capital Bank, its knowledgeprospects for the future and projected financial results;

the consideration offered by OceanFirst, which, as of Ocean Shore’sOctober 25, 2018, the date the Capital Bank board approved the merger agreement, represented: 166% of Capital Bank’s tangible book value per fully diluted share; 13.2x Capital Bank’s trailing twelve month core earnings; and a 7.5% core deposit premium;

that, as of October 25, 2018, the merger was estimated to be approximately 2.0% accretive to OceanFirst’s 2020 estimated earnings in the first full year of combined operations;

that, after the merger, Capital Bank stockholders who continue to hold the OceanFirst common stock they receive in the merger will receive annual cash dividends from OceanFirst estimated to equal at least $0.75 per share of Capital Bank common stock, on a pro forma basis based on the exchange ratio and OceanFirst’s current dividend policy, compared to Capital Bank’s current annual dividends to its stockholders of $0.40 per share, an 87.5% increase;

the understanding of the Capital Bank board of the strategic options available to Capital Bank and the Capital Bank board’s assessment of those options with respect to the prospects and estimated results of the execution by Capital Bank of its business plan as an independent entity under various scenarios and the determination that none of those options or the execution of the business plan was more likely to create greater present value for Capital Bank stockholders than the value to be paid by OceanFirst;

Boenning’s advice to the Capital Bank board that, in Boenning’s view, the merger consideration to be received by the holders of Capital Bank common stock in the merger was likely to be in excess of any offer that might be proposed by other potential bidders;

the prospects of profitably deploying Capital Bank’s excess capital in a reasonable period of time;

the challenges facing Capital Bank’s management to grow Capital Bank’s franchise and enhance stockholder value given current market conditions, including increased operating costs resulting from regulatory and compliance mandates, continued pressure on net interest margin from the current interest rate environment and competition;

the strong capital position of the combined company and the larger scale and more diverse revenue of the combined company;

the relative value of the OceanFirst share currency compared to peers;

the geographic fit and increased customer convenience of the expanded branch network of OceanFirst;

OceanFirst’s business, operations, financial condition, asset quality, earnings loan portfolio, capital and prospects, both as an independent organization and as a part of a combined company with OceanFirst;

its understanding of OceanFirst’s business, operations, regulatory and financial condition, asset quality, earnings, capital and prospects, taking into account presentations by senior Ocean Shore managementthe results of itsCapital Bank’s due diligence review of OceanFirst and information furnishedprovided by Sandler O’Neill;Capital Bank’s financial advisor;

 

the facthistorical stock market performance for OceanFirst common stock;

the greater market capitalization and increased trading liquidity of the OceanFirst common stock;

the ability to leverage OceanFirst’s significant integration expertise gained from its successful integrations of four acquisitions since 2015;

the enhanced legal lending limit and an expanded set of products and services that could benefit Capital Bank’s customers;

the implied valueterms of the merger consideration asagreement, including the representations, warranties and covenants of July 11, 2016 of $22.40 for each share of Ocean Shore common stock, based on OceanFirst’s closing stock price of $18.67 on that date, represented a 31.8% premium over the closing price of Ocean Shore common stock on July 11, 2016;

its belief thatparties, and the Transactions will result in a stronger banking franchise with a diversified revenue stream, strong capital ratios, a well-balanced loan portfolio and an attractive funding base that has the potential to deliver a higher value to Ocean Shore’s stockholders as compared to continuing to operate as a stand-alone entity;merger consideration;

 

the expanded possibilities, including organic growth and future acquisitions, that would be availablefinancial analysis presented by Boenning to the combined company, given its larger size, asset base, capital, market capitalization and footprint;

the anticipated pro forma impact of the Transactions on OceanFirst, including potential synergies,Capital Bank board, and the expected impact on financial metrics such as earnings and tangible common equity per share, as well as on regulatory capital levels;

the financial analyses of Sandler O’Neill, Ocean Shore’s independent financial advisor, and its written opinion dated as of July 12, 2016, delivered to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board by Boenning to the effect that, as of thatthe date of the opinion, and subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and basedqualifications and limitations on the various assumptions, considerations, qualifications and limitationsreview undertaken by Boenning as set forth in the opinion, the merger consideration wasto be received by the holders of Capital Bank common stock in the merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Ocean Shore common stock;such stockholders; and

 

the stock componentlong-term and short-term interests of Capital Bank and its stockholders, the interests of the merger consideration would give Ocean Shore stockholders the opportunity to participate as stockholderscustomers of OceanFirst in the future performanceCapital Bank, and societal considerations, including those of the combined company;

the fact that, assuming OceanFirst continued its dividends at approximately their current level, Ocean Shore stockholders would receive an over 100% increase in annual cash dividends received;

the fact that the integrated mergers are expected to be treated as an integrated transaction that qualifies as a “reorganization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes and therefore that the Ocean Shore stockholders will not recognize gain or loss with respect to their receipt of the stock portion of the merger consideration;

the fact that upon completion of the Transactions Ocean Shore stockholders will own approximately 20% of the outstanding shares of the combined company;

the continued representation of the Ocean Shore stockholders in the governance of the combined company through the appointment of three of Ocean Shore’s directors to the OceanFirst board and the remaining four Ocean Shore directors, as well as Mr. Brady, to an advisory board for the two year period following the completion of the Transactions;

the fact that the more active trading market in the OceanFirst common stock would give Ocean Shore stockholders greater liquidity for their investment;

the benefits to Ocean Shore and its customers of operating as a larger organization, including enhancements in products and services, higher lending limits, and greater financial resources;

the increasing importance of operational scale and financial resources in maintaining efficiency and remaining competitive over the long term and in being able to capitalize on technological developments that significantly impact industry competitive conditions;

the expected social and economic impact of the Transactions on the constituencies served by Ocean Shore, including its borrowers, customers, depositors, employees, and communities;

the effects of the Transactions on Ocean Shore employees, including the prospects for continued employment in a larger organization and various benefits agreed to be provided to Ocean Shore employees;

OceanFirst’s commitment to supporting charitable activities within its market area, as evidenced by the operation of the OceanFirst Foundation;

the Ocean Shore board’s understanding of the current and prospective environmentcommunities in which Ocean Shore and OceanFirst operate, including national and local economic conditions, the interest rate environment, increasing operating costs resulting from regulatory initiatives and compliance mandates, and the competitive effects of the continuing consolidation in the banking industry;
Capital Bank maintains offices.

the low probability of securing a more attractive proposal from another institution capable of consummating the transaction in a timely manner;

the ability of OceanFirst to complete the Transactions from a financial and regulatory perspective, as evidenced in part by OceanFirst’s recent completion of the Cape acquisition; and

the Ocean Shore board’s review with its independent legal advisor, Kilpatrick Townsend, of the material terms of the merger agreement, including the board’s ability, under certain circumstances, to withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify its recommendation to Ocean Shore’s stockholders and to consider and pursue an unsolicited acquisition proposal that would constitute a superior proposal, subject to the terms of the merger agreement, including under certain circumstances the required payment by Ocean Shore of a termination fee to OceanFirst, which the Ocean Shore board concluded was reasonable in the context of termination fees in comparable transactions and in light of the overall terms of the merger agreement, as well as the nature of the covenants, representations and warranties and termination provisions in the merger agreement.

The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board also considered a number of potential conflicts, risks and uncertainties associated with the Transactionsmerger in connection with its deliberation of the proposed transaction,merger, including, without limitation, the following:

 

with stock consideration based on a fixed exchange ratio,

the risk that theuncertainty as to whether soliciting potential purchasers of Capital Bank other than OceanFirst would yield greater value of the consideration to be paid to Ocean Shore stockholders would be adversely affected by a decrease in the trading price of OceanFirst common stock during the pendency of the Transactions;Capital Bank and its stockholders;

 

the potential risk of diverting managementmanagement’s attention and resources from the operation of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s business and towards the completion of the Transactions;merger;

 

that certain terms of

the merger agreement impose restrictions on the conduct of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s business prior tobefore the completion of the Transactions,merger, which are customary for public company merger agreements involving financial institutions, but which, subject to specific exceptions, could delay or prevent Ocean ShoreCapital Bank from undertaking business opportunities that may arise or any other action it would otherwise take with respect to the operations of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank absent the pending merger;

 

the possibility that OceanFirst may be unable to successfully integrate Capital Bank into its existing franchise;

the potential risks associated with achieving anticipated cost synergies and savings and successfully integrating Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s business, operations and workforce with those of OceanFirst, while also integrating the business, operations and workforce of Cape;OceanFirst;

 

the factexpenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement, the expenses that OceanFirst will incur in its integration of Capital Bank following the effective time and other merger-related costs;

the interests of certain of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s directors and executive officers may bethat are different from, or in addition to, the interests of Ocean Shore’s other Capital Bank stockholders as described under the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitledheading “—Interests of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Transactions;Merger;

 

the factrisk that Sandler O’Neill, Ocean Shore’s financial advisor in connection with the Transactions, also maintains an investment banking relationship with OceanFirst, although OceanFirst was independently advised by another investment banking firm in its consideration of the Transactions;

that, while Ocean Shore expects that the Transactions will be consummated, there can be no assurance that all of the conditions to the parties’ obligations of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore to complete the Transactions, as set forth in the merger agreement, willmay not be satisfied, including the risk that the requisitenecessary regulatory approvals or waivers, the requisiteCapital Bank stockholders’ approval of the OceanFirst stockholders or the requisite approval of the Ocean Shore stockholders might not be obtained and, as a result, the Transactionsmerger may not be consummated;

 

the risk of potential employee attrition and/or adverse effects on business and customer relationships as a result of the pending merger;

the factrisk that otherany potential buyers may be discouragedrights of and benefits to Capital Bank employees from pursing a strategic transaction with Ocean Shore because, under the merger agreement Ocean Shoreor the merger may not be realized, and such employees’ lack of any third-party beneficiary rights in the merger agreement to enforce any such rights;

that: (1) Capital Bank would be: (i)be prohibited from affirmatively soliciting acquisition proposals and, subject to satisfying certain conditions, responding to unsolicited acquisition proposals, in each case, after execution of the merger agreement; and (ii)(2) Capital Bank would be obligated to pay to OceanFirst thea termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances;circumstances, which may discourage other parties potentially interested in a strategic transaction with Capital Bank from pursuing such a transaction; and

 

the possibility of litigation challengingother risks described under the Transactions, and its belief that any such litigation would be without merit but may result in substantial cost and/or delay in consummation of the Transactions.heading “Risk Factors.”

The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board. In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, the Transactionsmerger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board did not quantify or assign any relative weights to the factors considered, and individual directors may have given different weights to different factors. The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board considered all these factors as a whole, including discussions with, and questioning of, Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s management and Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s independent financial and legal advisors, and overall considered the factors to be favorable to, and to support, its determination.

The Ocean Shore board unanimously recommends that Ocean Shore’s stockholders vote “FOR” the approval of the Ocean Shore merger proposal, “FOR” the Ocean Shore merger-related compensation proposal and “FOR” the Ocean Shore adjournment proposal. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders should be aware that Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s directors and executive officers have interests in the Transactionsmerger that are different from, or in addition to, those of other Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders. The Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board was aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement and in recommending that the Ocean Shore merger proposal be approved by the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders. See “—Interests of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Transactions.Merger.

This summary of the reasoning of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board and other information presented in this section includes information that is forward-looking in nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the factors discussed under the heading “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Opinion of Ocean Shore’sBoenning & Scattergood, Inc., Capital Bank’s Financial Advisor

By letter dated July 21, 2015, Ocean Shore retained Sandler O’NeillCapital Bank engaged Boenning to act asrender financial advisoradvisory and investment banking services to Capital Bank, including rendering an opinion to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Capital Bank common stock of the merger consideration to be received in connection with Ocean Shore’s consideration of a possible business combination. Sandler O’Neillthe merger. Capital Bank selected Boenning because Boenning is a nationally recognized investment banking firm whose principal business specialty is financial institutions. Inwith substantial experience in transactions similar to the ordinary coursemerger. As part of its investment banking business, Sandler O’NeillBoenning is regularlycontinually engaged in the valuation of financial institutionsservices businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions. Sandler O’Neill was also familiar with Ocean Shore, having acted as offering agent for Ocean Shore in connection with

As part of its initial public offering in 2004engagement, representatives of Boenning attended the meeting of the Capital Bank board held on October 25, 2018 at which the Capital Bank board evaluated the merger. At this meeting, Boenning reviewed the financial aspects of the proposed merger and its public offering in 2009 in connection with its conversion from the mutual holding company form of organizationrendered an opinion to the stock holding company form of organization, and having provided the Ocean Shore board with periodic updates on the market, strategic alternatives available to Ocean Shore and similar matters for over ten years.

Sandler O’Neill acted as financial advisor to Ocean Shore in connection with the Transactions and participated in certain of the negotiations leading to the execution of the merger agreement. At the July 12, 2016 meeting at which Ocean Shore’s board considered and approved the merger agreement, Sandler O’Neill delivered to the Ocean Shore board its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing,effect that, as of such date the merger consideration was fairand subject to the holders of Ocean Shore common stock from a financial point of view. Sandler O’Neill’s fairness opinion was approved by Sandler O’Neill’s fairness opinion committee.The full text of Sandler O’Neill’s opinion is attached asAnnex C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The opinion outlines the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Sandler O’NeillBoenning as set forth in rendering its opinion.such opinion, the merger consideration to be received in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Capital Bank common stock. The Capital Bank board adopted the merger agreement at this meeting.

The following description of the Boenning fairness opinion set

forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. Holders of Ocean Shore common stock are urged opinion, which is attached asAnnex Dto readthis proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference, and describes the entire opinion carefullyprocedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Boenning in connection with their consideration ofpreparing the proposed Transactions.opinion.

Sandler O’Neill’sBoenning’s opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion and was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed on, and the information made available to Sandler O’Neill as of, that date. Events occurring or information available after that date could materially affect its opinion. Sandler O’Neill has not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date of its opinion. The opinion was for the information of, and was directed to, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board and is directed(in its capacity as such) in connection with its consideration of the financial terms of the merger. The opinion addressed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be received in the merger by holders of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock from a financial point of view.stock. It doesdid not address the underlying business decision of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank to engage in the Transactionsmerger or any other aspect ofenter into the Transactionsmerger agreement or constitute a recommendation to the Capital Bank board in connection with the merger, and isit does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock or any stockholder of any other entity as to how to vote in connection with the merger or any other matter, nor does it constitute a recommendation as to whether or not any such stockholder should vote at the special meetingenter into a voting, stockholders’, affiliates’ or other agreement with respect to the Transactionsmerger or exercise any other matter. Sandler O’Neill did not express anydissenters’ or appraisal rights that may be available to such stockholder.

Boenning’s opinion as towas reviewed and approved by Boenning’s Fairness Opinion Committee in conformity with its policies and procedures established under the fairnessrequirements of Rule 5150 of the amount or nature of the compensation to be received in the Transactions by Ocean Shore officers, directors or employees, or class of such persons, if any, relative to the consideration to be received by Ocean Shore common stockholders.Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

In connection with rendering itsthe opinion Sandler O’Neilldescribed above, Boenning reviewed, analyzed and considered,relied upon material bearing upon the financial and operating condition of Capital Bank and OceanFirst and bearing upon the merger, including, among other things:

 

a draft of the merger agreement;agreement, dated as of October 25, 2018;

 

certain publicly available

the audited financial statements and other historical financial information of Ocean Shore that Sandler O’Neill deemed relevant;

certain publicly available financial statements and other historical financial information of OceanFirst that Sandler O’Neill deemed relevant;

Ocean Shore’s budgetthe Annual Reports on Form10-K for the year endingthree fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and publicly available consensus analyst earnings per share estimates for Ocean Shore for the years ending2015, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2017 as well as an estimated internal projected earnings growth rateof OceanFirst;

the unaudited quarterly financial statements and Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q for the years thereafter, as discussed with the senior management of Ocean Shore;fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2018 for OceanFirst;

 

publicly available consensus mean analyst earnings per share estimates for OceanFirst

the financial statements and the Annual Reports for the three fiscal years endingended December 31, 2015, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2017 of Capital Bank;

the quarterly financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018 of Capital Bank;

certain publicly available regulatory filings of Capital Bank and OceanFirst and their respective subsidiaries, including (as applicable) quarterly reports on FormFRY-9C and quarterly call reports with respect to each quarter during the three-year period ended December 31, 2017 and the quarters ended March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018;

other interim reports and other communications of Capital Bank and OceanFirst to their respective stockholders; and

other financial information concerning the respective businesses and operations of Capital Bank and OceanFirst furnished to Boenning by Capital Bank or OceanFirst or which Boenning was otherwise directed to use for purposes of its analysis.

Boenning’s consideration of financial information and other factors that it deemed appropriate under the circumstances or relevant to its analyses included, among others, the following:

the historical and current financial position and results of operations of Capital Bank and OceanFirst;

the assets and liabilities of Capital Bank and OceanFirst;

the nature and terms of certain other merger transactions and business combinations in the banking industry;

a comparison of relevant financial and stock market information of Capital Bank and OceanFirst with similar information for certain other companies, the securities of which were publicly traded;

Capital Bank management guidance for earnings estimates as well as an estimated internal projected earningsCapital Bank’s assumed long-term growth rate for the years thereafter, asrates provided to Boenning by Capital Bank management, all of which was discussed with Boenning by Capital Bank management and confirmedused and relied upon by Boenning at the seniordirection of such management and with the consent of OceanFirst;the Capital Bank board;

 

publicly available consensus “street estimates” of OceanFirst published by S&P Global Market Intelligence, as well as OceanFirst’s assumed long-term growth rates provided to Boenning by OceanFirst management, all of which was discussed with Boenning by Capital Bank management and used and relied upon by Boenning at the direction of such management and with the consent of the Capital Bank board; and

estimates regarding relevant pro forma financial impact of the Transactionsmerger on OceanFirst based on certain assumptions relating to transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments,(including without limitation the cost savings and a core deposit intangible asset,related expenses expected to result or be derived from the merger) that

were provided by the senior management of OceanFirst, provided to and discussed with Boenning by Capital Bank and OceanFirst management, and used and relied upon by Boenning at the direction of Capital Bank management and with the consent of the Capital Bank board.

Boenning also performed such other studies and analyses as it considered appropriate and took into account its assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions and its experience in other transactions, as well as financial projections for Ocean Shore for the years ending December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2020, as provided byits experience in securities valuation and discussed with the senior managementknowledge of OceanFirst;

the publicly reported historical price and trading activity for Ocean Shore and OceanFirst common stock, including a comparison of certain stock market information for Ocean Shore and OceanFirst common stock and certain stock indices as well as publicly available information for certain other similar companies, the securities of which are publicly traded;

a comparison of certain financial information for Ocean Shore and OceanFirst with similar banks and thrifts for which information is publicly available;

the financial terms of certain recent mergers and business combinations in the bank and thrift industry (on a regional and national basis), to the extent publicly available;

the current market environment generally and the banking environmentindustry generally. Boenning also participated in particular;discussions that were held by the respective managements of Capital Bank and

such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria as Sandler O’Neill considered relevant.

Sandler O’Neill also discussed with certain members of the senior management of Ocean Shore the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Ocean Shore and held similar discussions with certain members of the senior management of OceanFirst regarding the past and current business operations, regulatory relations, financial condition results of operations and future prospects of OceanFirst.each of their respective companies and such other matters as Boenning deemed relevant to its inquiry.

In performingconducting its review and analyses and in renderingarriving at its opinion, Sandler O’NeillBoenning relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information that was available to and reviewed by Sandler O’Neill from public sources, that was provided to Sandler O’Neill by Ocean Shore or OceanFirst, or their respective representatives,it or that was publicly available and did not independently verify the accuracy or completeness of any such information or assume any responsibility or liability for such verification, accuracy or completeness. Boenning relied upon the management of Capital Bank as to the reasonableness and achievability of the publicly available consensus “street estimates” of OceanFirst (and the assumed long-term growth rates of Capital Bank and OceanFirst) referred to above that were provided to or otherwise revieweddiscussed with Boenning by Sandler O’Neill,Capital Bank and Sandler O’NeillOceanFirst management, and that in each case Boenning was directed by Capital Bank management to use. Boenning further relied upon Capital Bank management as to the reasonableness and achievability of the estimates regarding relevant pro forma financial impact of the merger on OceanFirst (including, without limitation, the cost savings and related expenses expected to result or be derived from the merger) referred to above. Boenning assumed, at the direction of Capital Bank management, that all of the foregoing information was reasonably prepared on bases reflecting, or in the case of the OceanFirst publicly available “street estimates” referred to above that such accuracyestimates were consistent with, the best currently available estimates and completeness for purposesjudgments of the respective management teams of Capital Bank and OceanFirst, and that the forecasts, projections and estimates reflected in such information would be realized in the amounts and in the time periods estimated. Accordingly, with the consent of the Capital Bank board, in rendering its opinion. Sandler O’Neill further reliedopinion, Boenning’s reliance upon Capital Bank management as to the reasonableness and achievability of such information included reliance upon the judgments and assessments of the Capital Bank and Capital Bank management with respect to such information.

It is understood that the forecasts and estimates of Capital Bank and OceanFirst provided to Boenning were not prepared with the expectation of public disclosure and that such information, together with the publicly available consensus “street estimates” referred to above that Boenning was directed to use, was based on the assurances ofnumerous variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain, including, without limitation, factors related to general economic and competitive conditions and that, accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those set forth in such information. Boenning assumed, based on discussions with the respective managements of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst and with the consent of the Capital Bank board, that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make any ofall such information inaccurateprovided a reasonable basis upon which Boenning could form its opinion and Boenning expressed no view as to any such information or misleading. Sandler O’Neill was not asked tothe assumptions or bases therefor. Boenning relied on all such information without independent verification or analysis and did not undertake an independent verification ofin any of such information and Sandler O’Neill did notrespect assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness thereof. Sandler O’Neill did not make an independent evaluation or perform an appraisal of the specific assets, the collateral securing assets or the liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Ocean Shore or OceanFirst, or any of their respective subsidiaries, nor was Sandler O’Neill furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Sandler O’Neill rendered no opinion or evaluation on the collectability of any assets or the future performance of any loans of Ocean Shore or OceanFirst. Sandler O’Neill did not make an independent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses of Ocean Shore or OceanFirst, or the combined entity after the Transactions, and Sandler O’Neill did not review any individual credit files relating to Ocean Shore or OceanFirst. Sandler O’Neill assumed, with Ocean Shore’s consent, that the respective allowances for loan losses for both Ocean Shore and OceanFirst were adequate to cover such losses and would be adequate on a pro forma basis for the combined entity.

In preparing its analyses, Sandler O’Neill used publicly available consensus mean analyst earnings per share estimates for Ocean Shore for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 as well as an internal estimated earnings growth rate for the years ending December 31, 2018 through 2020, as discussed with the senior management of Ocean Shore. With respect to OceanFirst, Sandler O’Neill used publicly available consensus mean analyst earnings per share estimates for OceanFirst for the years ending December 31, 2016 (adjusted for one-time expenses expected to be incurred in connection with the closing of the Cape acquisition) and December 31, 2017, as well as an internal estimated earnings growth rate for the years ending December 31, 2018 through 2020, as discussed with the senior management of OceanFirst. Sandler O’Neill also received and used in its pro forma analyses certain assumptions relating to transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments, cost savings and a core deposit intangible asset, as well as financial projections for Ocean Shore for the years ending December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2020, as provided by and discussed with the senior management of OceanFirst. With respect to the foregoing information, the respective managements of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst confirmed to Sandler O’Neill that such information reflected (or, in the case of the publicly available mean analyst earnings per share estimates referred to above, were consistent with) the best currently available projections, estimates and judgments of those respective senior managements of the future financial performance of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst, and Sandler O’Neill assumed that such performance would be achieved. Sandler O’Neill expressed no opinion as to such projections, estimates or judgments, or the assumptions on which they were based. Sandler O’NeillBoenning also assumed that there had beenwere no material changechanges in Ocean Shore’s or OceanFirst’sthe assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of either Capital Bank or OceanFirst since the date of the most recentlast financial statements of each such entity that were made available to Sandler O’Neill. Sandler O’NeillBoenning and that Boenning was directed to use. Boenning is not an expert in the independent verification of the adequacy of allowances for loan and lease losses and Boenning assumed, without independent verification and with Capital Bank’s consent, that the aggregate allowances for loan and lease losses for each of Capital Bank and OceanFirst are adequate to cover such losses. In rendering its opinion, Boenning did not make or obtain any evaluations or appraisals or physical inspection of the property, assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Capital Bank or OceanFirst, the collateral securing any of such assets or liabilities, or the collectability of any such assets, nor did Boenning examine any individual

loan or credit files, nor did it evaluate the solvency, financial capability or fair value of Capital Bank or OceanFirst under any state or federal laws, including those relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or other matters. Estimates of values of companies and assets do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or assets may actually be sold. Because such estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty, Boenning assumed no responsibility or liability for their accuracy.

Boenning assumed, in all respects material to its analysis that Ocean Shore and OceanFirst will remain as going concerns for all periods relevantanalyses:

the merger would be completed substantially in accordance with the terms set forth in the merger agreement (the final terms of which Boenning assumed would not differ in any respect material to its analyses.

Sandler O’Neill also assumed, with Ocean Shore’s consent, that (i) eachanalyses from the draft of the partiesmerger agreement that had been reviewed) with no adjustments to the merger consideration to be received and with no other consideration or payments in respect of the Capital Bank common stock;

that any related transactions would be completed as contemplated by the merger agreement or as otherwise described to Boenning by representatives of Capital Bank;

the representations and warranties of Capital Bank and of OceanFirst in the merger agreement and in all related documents and instruments referred to in the merger agreement were true and correct;

each party to the merger agreement would comply in all material respects with all material terms and conditionsor any of the merger agreement and all related agreements, that all of the representations and warranties contained in such agreements were true and correct in all material respects, that each of the parties to such agreementsdocuments would perform in all material respects all of the covenants and other obligationsagreements required to be performed by such party under such agreementsthe merger agreement or any of the related documents, and that

the conditions precedent in the merger agreement and such agreements were not anddocument would not be waived, (ii) waived;

the merger will qualify as atax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes; and

in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for the consummation of the merger and any related transaction, no condition will be included that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the combined entity or third party approvals, consentsthe contemplated benefits of the merger, including the cost savings and releasesrelated expenses expected to result from the merger.

Boenning assumed that the merger would be consummated in a manner that complied with the applicable provisions of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and all other applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations. Boenning was further advised by representatives of Capital Bank that the Capital Bank board relied upon advice from its advisors (other than Boenning) or other appropriate sources as to all legal, financial reporting, tax, accounting and regulatory matters with respect to Capital Bank, OceanFirst, the Transactions,merger and any related transaction and the merger agreement. Boenning did not provide advice with respect to any such matters.

Boenning’s opinion addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view, as of the date of such opinion, of the merger consideration to be received in the merger by the holders of Capital Bank common stock. Boenning expressed no delay,view or opinion as to any other terms or aspects of the merger or any term or aspect of any related transaction, including without limitation, restrictionthe form or condition would be imposed that would have an adverse effect on Ocean Shore, OceanFirst orstructure of the Transactionsmerger or any related transaction, (iii) the Transactions and any related transactions would be consummated in accordance with the termsconsequences of the merger agreement withoutto Capital Bank, its stockholders, creditors or otherwise, or any waiver, modificationterms, aspects, merits or amendmentimplications of any material term, conditionemployment, retention, consulting, voting, support, cooperation, stockholder or agreement thereof andother agreements, arrangements or understandings contemplated or entered into in complianceconnection with all applicable laws and other requirements, (iv) the Transactions would be consummated without Ocean Shore’s rights under Section 8.1(g) of the merger, agreement having been triggered, and (v) the integrated mergers would qualify as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. Finally, with Ocean Shore’s consent, Sandler O’Neill relied upon the advice that Ocean Shore received from its legal, accounting and tax advisors as to all legal, accounting and tax matters relating to the Transactions and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

Sandler O’Neill’sany related transaction or otherwise. Boenning’s opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and otherupon conditions as in effectthey existed and could be evaluated on the date of such opinion and the information made available to Sandler O’Neill as of,Boenning through such date. Developments subsequent to the date of its opinion. Events occurring afterBoenning’s opinion may have affected, and may affect, the date of theconclusion reached in Boenning’s opinion, could materially affect Sandler O’Neill’s views. Sandler O’Neill hasand Boenning did not undertakenand does not have an obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. Boenning’s opinion did not address, and Boenning expressed no view or withdraw its opinion with respect to:

the underlying business decision of Capital Bank to engage in the merger or otherwise comment upon events occurring afterenter into the datemerger agreement;

the relative merits of the opinion. Sandler O’Neill expressed no opinionmerger as compared to any other business strategies or transactions the Capital Bank board has considered or may be considering;

the prices at which OceanFirst’s securities may trade;

the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to any of Capital Bank’s officers, directors or employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the trading values of Ocean Shore common stock or OceanFirst common stock at any time or what the value of OceanFirst common stock would be once it is actually received bycompensation to the holders of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock;

any advice or opinions provided by any other advisor to any of the parties to the merger or any other transaction contemplated by the merger agreement; or

any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting matters relating to Capital Bank, OceanFirst, any of their respective stockholders, or relating to or arising out of or as a consequence of the merger or any other related transaction, including whether or not the merger would qualify as atax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes.

The Boenning opinion was among several factors taken into consideration by the Capital Bank board in making its determination to approve the merger agreement and the merger. Consequently, the analyses described below should not be viewed as determinative of the decision of the Capital Bank board with respect to the fairness of the merger consideration to be paid in the merger to the holders of Capital Bank common stock. The type and amount of consideration payable in the merger were determined through negotiation between Capital Bank and OceanFirst, and the decision for Capital Bank to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of the Capital Bank board.

In renderingThe following is a summary of the material financial analyses presented by Boenning to the Capital Bank board in connection with its opinion, Sandler O’Neill performed a variety of financial analyses.opinion. The summary below is not a complete description of all the financial analyses underlying Sandler O’Neill’sthe opinion or the presentation made by Sandler O’NeillBoenning to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board, but is a summary of allsummarizes the material analyses performed and presented by Sandler O’Neill.in connection with such opinion. The summary includesfinancial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format.In order to fully understand the financial analyses, these tables must be read together with the accompanying text. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytic process involving subjective judgmentsvarious determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. The process, therefore,Therefore, a fairness opinion is not necessarilyreadily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description. Also, no company includedIn arriving at its opinion, Boenning did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor that it considered, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. Accordingly, Boenning believes that its analyses and the summary of its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on the information presented below in Sandler O’Neill’s comparativetabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses and opinion.

Implied Transaction Multiples(1)

1.

For purposes of the financial analyses described below (including the transaction multiples in2-5 below), Boenning utilized an implied transaction value for the merger of $84.6 million, or $33.10 per outstanding share of Capital Bank common stock, which was calculated by multiplying the average closing price of OceanFirst common stock for the10-day period ending on October 22, 2018 by the exchange ratio.

2.

189.6% of Capital Bank’s book value (2)

3.

189.6% of Capital Bank’s tangible book value (which we refer to as “TBV”) (3)

4.

15.1x Capital Bank’s latest twelve months (which we refer to as “LTM”) core earnings per share (which we refer to as “EPS”) (4)

5.

10.7% core deposit premium defined as the premium paid to TBV divided by Capital Bank’s core deposits

(1)

Information for Capital Bank as of and for the LTM ended June 30, 2018.

(2)

$84.6 million purchase price / $44.6 million of Book Value.

(3)

$84.6 million purchase price / $44.6 million of Tangible Book Value.

(4)

$84.6 million purchase price / $5.6 million of Normalized LTM Net Income excluding the impact of DTAs and otherone-time items.

Capital Bank Selected Companies Analysis. Using publicly available information, Boenning compared the financial performance, financial condition and market performance of Capital Bank to 17 major exchange-traded banks and bank holding companies (i) with total assets between $400 million and $600 million with a median of $463 million, (ii) headquartered in theMid-Atlantic and (iii) excluding companies that are in the process of being acquired (we collectively refer to such banks and bank holding companies as “Capital Bank selected companies”).

The Capital Bank selected companies were as follows:

Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.Muncy Bank Financial, Inc.
1st Colonial Bancorp, Inc.York Traditions Bank
Steuben Trust CorporationPSB Holding Corporation
Calvin B. Taylor Bankshares, Inc.National Capital Bank of Washington
Northumberland BancorpMauch Chunk Trust Financial Corp.
Jeffersonville BancorpFrederick County Bancorp, Inc.
Ballston Spa Bancorp, Inc.Hamlin Bank and Trust Company
Gold Coast Bancorp, Inc.IBW Financial Corporation
New Tripoli Bancorp, Inc.

To perform this analysis, Boenning used profitability data and other financial information as of, or for the most recent quarter (which we refer to as “MRQ”) ended, June 30, 2018 or March 31, 2018 and market price information as of October 22, 2018. Certain financial data prepared by Boenning, as referenced in the tables presented below, may not correspond to the data set forth in Capital Bank’s historical financial statements as a result of the different periods, assumptions and methods used by Boenning to compute the financial data presented.

Boenning’s analysis showed the following concerning the financial condition and performance of Capital Bank and the Capital Bank selected companies:

   Capital
Bank
   Capital Bank Selected Companies 
   Low   Average   Median   High 

Tangible Common Equity / Tangible Assets (%)

   9.2    6.7    10.4    9.6    20.7 

Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) / Assets (%)

   0.08    0.02    0.82    0.68    3.63 

LTM Core Return on Average Assets (%)(1)

   1.17    0.18    0.88    0.79    1.86 

LTM Core Return on Average Equity (%)(1)

   12.79    2.05    8.01    8.00    12.40 

LTM Efficiency Ratio (%)

   57.3    53.7    69.4    68.9    92.0 

(1)

Core income excludes extraordinary items, nonrecurring revenues/expenses, gain/loss on sale of securities and amortization of intangibles.

In addition, Boenning’s analysis showed the following concerning the market performance of the Capital Bank selected companies:

   Capital
Bank
   Capital Bank Selected Companies 
   Low   Average   Median   High 

Dividend Yield (%)

   1.63    0.33    2.45    2.65    3.98 

Stock Price / Tangible Book Value per Share (%)

   139.0    51.9    123.9    127.9    196.3 

Stock Price / LTM Core EPS (x) (1)

   11.1    11.3    20.5    16.2    44.2 

(1)

Core EPS excludes extraordinary items, nonrecurring revenues/expenses, gain/loss on sale of securities and amortization of intangibles.

None of the Capital Bank selected companies used as a comparison in the above analyses is identical to Ocean Shore or OceanFirst and no transaction is identical to the Transactions.Capital Bank. Accordingly, an analysis of comparable companies or transactionsthese results is not mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies and other factors that could affect the public trading values or merger transaction values, as the case may be, of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst and the companies to which they are being compared. involved.

In arriving at its opinion, Sandler O’Neill did not attribute any particular weight to anyaddition, Boenning’s analysis or factor that it considered. Rather, it made qualitative judgments ascompared deal multiples to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. Sandler O’Neill did not formpricing multiples for the Capital Bank selected companies. To account for an opinion as to whether any individual analysis or factor (positive or negative) considered in isolation supported or failed to support its opinion; rather, Sandler O’Neill made its determination as to the fairness of the merger considerationequity control premium, Boenning applied a 28.4% premium based on the basis of its experiencemedian1-day stock price premium for all bank and professional judgment after considering the results of all its analyses taken as a whole.

In performing its analyses, Sandler O’Neill also made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, business and economic conditions and various other matters, many of which cannot be predicted and are beyond the control of Ocean Shore, OceanFirst and Sandler O’Neill. The analyses performed by Sandler O’Neill are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, both of which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses. Sandler O’Neill prepared its analyses solely for purposes of rendering its opinion and provided such analyses to the Ocean Shore board of directors at its July 12, 2016 meeting. Estimates on the values of companies do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or their securities may actually be sold. Such estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty and actual values may be materially different. Accordingly, Sandler O’Neill’s analyses do not necessarily reflect the value of Ocean Shore common stock or the prices at which Ocean Shore’s common stock or OceanFirst’s common stock may be sold at any time. The analyses of Sandler O’Neill and its opinion were among a number of

factors taken into consideration by the Ocean Shore board in making its determination to approve the merger agreement and the analyses described below should not be viewed as determinative of the decision of the Ocean Shore board or management with respect to the fairness of the Transactions.

Summary of the Merger Consideration and Implied Transaction Metrics

Sandler O’Neill reviewed the financial terms of the proposed Transactions. As described in the merger agreement, each share of Ocean Shore common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time, other than certain shares described in the merger agreement, will be converted, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the merger agreement, into the right to receive the merger consideration, which consists of the following without interest, (i) cash in the amount of $4.35, and (ii) 0.9667 shares of OceanFirst common stock. Using the closing price of OceanFirst common stock on July 11, 2016 of $18.67, Sandler O’Neill calculated an implied per share value of the merger consideration of $22.40, and, based upon 6,412,678 Ocean Shore common shares outstanding as well as options to purchase 368,627 Ocean Shore common shares with a weighted average strike price of $11.45 per share, an implied aggregate transaction value of $147.7 million. Based upon financial information for Ocean Shore as of or for the twelve months ended March 31, 2016 and the closing price of Ocean Shore common stock on July 11, 2016 of $16.99, Sandler O’Neill calculated the following implied transaction multiples and premiums:thrift M&A deals since January 1, 2017.

 

Transaction Price / Last Twelve Months Earnings Per Share

20.0

Transaction Price / Book Value

126

Transaction Price / Tangible Book Value

132

Tangible Book Premium / Core Deposits(1)

5.2

Market Premium as of July 11, 2016

31.8
   OceanFirst /
Capital Bank
   Capital Bank Selected Companies 
   10th Percentile   Median   90th Percentile 

Price to Tangible Book Value (%)

   189.6    121.8    164.3    202.4 

Price to LTM Core Earnings (x)

   15.1    15.1    20.8    55.8 

Core Deposit Premium (%)

   10.7    0.4    5.3    14.2 

Price to Assets (%)

   16.8    9.7    14.6    28.7 

Price to Deposits (%)

   19.5    12.0    19.5    35.2 

(1)Tangible book premium to core deposits calculated as (deal value — tangible common equity) / (core deposits); core deposits defined as deposits, less time deposit accounts with balances over $100,000, foreign deposits and unclassified deposits.

Stock Trading History

Sandler O’Neill reviewed the historical publicly reported trading prices of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst common stock for the one-year and the three-year periods ended July 11, 2016. Sandler O’Neill then compared the relationship between the movements in the price of Ocean Shore common stock and OceanFirst common stock, respectively, to movements in their respective peer groups (as described on pages 63 and 65) as well as certain stock indices.

Ocean Shore’s One-Year Stock Performance

   Beginning Value
July 11, 2015
  Ending Value
July 11, 2016
 

Ocean Shore

   100  115.3

Ocean Shore Peer Group

   100  104.4

NASDAQ Bank Index

   100  95.7

S&P 500 Index

   100  102.9

Ocean Shore’s Three-Year Stock Performance

   Beginning Value
July 11, 2013
  Ending Value
July 11, 2016
 

Ocean Shore

   100  117.5

Ocean Shore Peer Group

   100  118.0

NASDAQ Bank Index

   100  120.1

S&P 500 Index

   100  127.6

OceanFirst’s One-Year Stock Performance

   Beginning Value
July 11, 2015
  Ending Value
July 11, 2016
 

OceanFirst

   100  99.9

OceanFirst Peer Group

   100  101.1

NASDAQ Bank Index

   100  95.7

S&P 500 Index

   100  102.9

OceanFirst’s Three-Year Stock Performance

   Beginning Value
July 11, 2013
  Ending Value
July 11, 2016
 

OceanFirst

   100  113.9

OceanFirst Peer Group

   100  120.8

NASDAQ Bank Index

   100  120.1

S&P 500 Index

   100  127.6

Review of Analyst Recommendations and Estimates

Sandler O’Neill reviewed publicly available research analyst estimates for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 and analyst recommendations to outline the current analyst views of OceanFirst. At July 11, 2016, four research analysts had published recommendations for OceanFirst, composed of four “outperform,” “buy” or “overweight” recommendations. The table below sets forth the median and mean of the earnings per share estimates:

   Median   Mean 

2016 earnings per share estimate(1)

  $1.39    $1.32  

2017 earnings per share estimate(1)

  $1.73    $1.73  

(1)Analyst earnings per share estimates may include undisclosed estimates in addition to the four reported and available.

Ocean Shore Comparable Company Analysis

Sandler O’NeillBoenning used publicly available information to compareperform a similar analysis for OceanFirst by comparing selected financial information for Ocean ShoreOceanFirst with a group of financial institutions selected by Sandler O’Neill.Boenning (which we refer to collectively as the “OceanFirst Peer Group”). The Ocean Shore peer groupOceanFirst Peer Group included 12 publicly traded savings banks and thrifts headquartered in theMid-Atlantic and Northeast Regions with total assets between $500 million$6.0 billion and $1.75$10.0 billion, excluding announced merger targets and companies with a non-performing assets/total assets ratio of greater than 2.5% at March 31, 2016 (the “Ocean Shore peer group”).MHCs. The Ocean Shore peer groupOceanFirst Peer Group consisted of the following companies:

 

CliftonProvident Financial Services, Inc.WSFS Financial Corp.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.S&T Bancorp, Inc.
NBT Bancorp Inc.  Malvern Bancorp, Inc.Tompkins Financial Corp.
CoastwayEagle Bancorp, Inc.  PathfinderKearny Financial Corp.
Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc.Flushing Financial Corp.
Elmira Savings BankFirst Commonwealth Financial Corp.  SI Financial Group, Inc.
Harleysville Savings Financial CorporationWestfield Financial,Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.

TheTo perform this analysis, compared publicly availableBoenning used profitability data and other financial information for Ocean Shore with the corresponding data for the Ocean Shore peer group as of, or for the twelve monthsMRQ ended, June 30, 2018 or March 31, 2016 (unless otherwise indicated), with pricing data2018 and market price information as of July 11, 2016.October 22, 2018. Certain financial data prepared by Boenning, as referenced in the tables presented below, may not correspond to the data presented in OceanFirst’s historical financial statements as a result of the different periods, assumptions and methods used by Boenning to compute the financial data presented.

Sandler O’Neill’sBoenning’s analysis showed the following information regardingconcerning the financial condition and performance and financial condition of Ocean ShoreOceanFirst and the Ocean Shore peer group.OceanFirst Peer Group for the MRQ:

 

Financial data as of or for the period ending March 31, 2016

  Balance Sheet  Capital Position  LTM Profitability  Valuation 
Pricing data as of July 11, 2016 City, State  Ticker  Total
Assets
($mm)
  Loans/
Deposits
(%)
  NPAs(1)/
Total
Assets

(%)
  1-4
Fam.
Loans/

Loans
(%)
  TCE/
TA
(%)
  CRE/
Total
RBC
(%)
  ROAA
(%)
  ROATCE
(%)
  Net
Interest
Margin
(%)
  Efficiency
Ratio

(%)
  Price/  LTM
Dividend
Ratio
(%)
  Market
Value
($mm)
 

Company

             Tang.
Book
Value
(%)
  LTM
EPS
(%)
  Current
Dividend
Yield
(%)
   

SI Financial Group, Inc.

  Willimantic, CT    SIFI    1,508    106.6    0.86    35.4    9.32    192.9    0.34    3.9    2.94    78.4    119    32.9    1.2    39.0    165  

Westfield Financial, Inc.

  Westfield, MA    WFD    1,369    89.1    0.63    35.8    10.45    132.4    0.47    4.6    2.56    77.0    100    21.7    1.5    33.3    142  

Clifton Bancorp Inc.

  Clifton, NJ    CSBK    1,253    112.9    0.39    78.7    25.16    44.6    0.46    1.6    2.39    68.1    115    NM    1.6    136.4    358  

Malvern Bancorp, Inc.

  Paoli, PA    MLVF    764    94.8    0.41    41.2    11.09    254.8(2)   0.73    6.1    2.67    72.1    118    19.6    0.0    0.0    100  

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation

  Harleysville, PA    HARL    759    101.8    1.53    58.0    8.49    150.2(2)   0.65    7.8    2.72    63.4    105    13.9    4.6    63.6    68  

Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.

  Oswego, NY    PBHC    665    80.5    1.14    43.1    8.18    86.1(2)   0.49    5.5    3.28    79.1    93    16.7    1.7    18.8    50  

Coastway Bancorp, Inc.

  Warwick, RI    CWAY    573    131.2    1.65    45.5    12.39    72.7(2)   0.36    2.7    3.41    80.2    85    29.3    NA    0.0    60  

Elmira Savings Bank

  Elmira, NY    ESBK    560    103.0    0.95    61.8    6.01    54.4    0.73    9.9    3.10    70.1    162    16.4    4.7    77.3    53  
   High    1,508    131.2    1.65    78.7    25.16    254.8    0.73    9.9    3.41    80.2    162    32.9    4.7    136.4    358  
   Low    560    80.5    0.39    35.4    6.01    44.6    0.34    1.6    2.39    63.4    85    13.9    0.0    0.0    50  
   Mean    931    102.5    0.95    49.9    11.39    123.5    0.53    5.3    2.89    73.5    112    21.5    2.2    46.1    125  
   Median    761    102.4    0.91    44.3    9.88    109.3    0.48    5.0    2.83    74.5    110    19.6    1.6    36.2    84  

Ocean Shore

    1,052    97.3    1.01    77.1    10.39    51.0    0.65    6.6    3.20    65.6    100    15.2    1.4    21.4    109  
   OceanFirst   OceanFirst Peer Group 
   Low   Average   Median   High 

Tangible Common Equity / Tangible Assets (%)

   8.9    7.5    9.8    9.2    16.5 

Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) / Assets (%)

   0.65    0.10    0.49    0.43    1.00 

MRQ Core Return on Average Assets (%)(1)

   1.23    0.73    1.27    1.27    1.94 

MRQ Core Return on Average Equity (%)(1)

   9.18    3.71    10.91    11.97    14.97 

MRQ Efficiency Ratio (%)

   58.6    36.4    55.1    57.0    61.9 

 

(1)Nonperforming assets defined as nonaccrual loans

Core income excludes extraordinary items, nonrecurring revenues/expenses, gain/loss on sale of securities and leases, renegotiated loans and leases, and real estate owned.

(2)Represents bank level regulatory data asamortization of March 31, 2016.intangibles.

Source: SNL Financial

In addition, Boenning’s analysis showed the following concerning the market performance of the OceanFirst Peer Group:

   OceanFirst   OceanFirst Peer Group 
   Low   Average   Median   High 

Dividend Yield (%)

   2.38    0.00    2.58    2.71    4.18 

Stock Price / Tangible Book Value per Share (%)

   185.7    109.6    183.5    185.0    233.7 

Stock Price / LTM EPS (x)

   22.3    11.0    18.5    15.8    54.1 

Stock Price / 2018 EPS (x)(1)

   12.5    11.4    15.6    13.6    43.6 

Stock Price / 2019 EPS (x)(1)

   11.3    10.5    13.5    12.7    25.6 

(1)

Based on consensus analyst estimates.

OceanFirst Comparable Company AnalysisSelect Transactions Analysis.

Sandler O’Neill used Boenning reviewed publicly available information related to perform a similar analysis for OceanFirstthree sets of selected U.S. bank transactions:

1.

32 selected national bank and thrift transactions (which we refer to as the “National group”) announced since January 1, 2018, with target assets between $300 million and $700 million and a median of $480 million;

2.

8 selectedMid-Atlantic bank and thrift transactions (which we refer to as the “Regional group”) announced since January 1, 2017, with target assets between $300 million and $700 million and a median of $488 million; and

3.

14 selected national bank and thrift transactions (which we refer to as the “Performance group”) announced since 2016, with (i) target assets between $300 million and $700 million and a median of $403 million, (ii) a tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio between 8.0% and 11.0 and (iii) a return on average equity ratio of between 10.0% and 13.0%.

All three sets of transactions exclude investor recapitalization transactions and atransactions without disclosed deal values.

National group of financial institutions as selected by Sandler O’Neill. The OceanFirst peer group included publicly traded banks and thrifts headquartered in the Mid-Atlantic Region with assets between $3.0 billion and $6.0 billion, excluding announced merger targets (which we refer to as the “OceanFirst peer group”). The OceanFirst peer group consisted of the following companies:

 

Acquirer Company

Company Acquired

Date Announced

Byline Bancorp, Inc.

Oak Park River Forest Bankshares, Inc.10/17/2018

American National Bankshares Inc.

HomeTown Bankshares Corporation10/1/2018

Citizens & Northern Corporation

Monument Bancorp, Inc. 9/28/2018

Lakeland Bancorp, Inc.

BeneficialHighlands Bancorp, Inc. Northfield8/23/2018

First Bancshares, Inc.

FMB Banking Corporation7/24/2018

Spirit of Texas Bancshares, Inc.

Comanche National Corporation7/19/2018

FS Bancorp, Inc.

Anchor Bancorp7/17/2018
Bridge

ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Greater Hudson Bank7/12/2018

City Holding Company

Poage Bankshares, Inc.7/11/2018

Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

Donegal Financial Services Corp.6/12/2018

FirstMid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc.

SCB Bancorp, Inc. Oritani Financial Corp.6/12/2018
Bryn Mawr Bank

CapStar Financial Holdings, Inc.

Athens Bancshares Corporation Peapack-Gladstone6/11/2018

First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.

Northern States Financial Corporation6/7/2018
ConnectOne

Business First Bancshares, Inc.

Richland State Bancorp, Inc. Sandy Spring6/4/2018

Independent Bank Corp.

MNB Bancorp5/29/2018

German American Bancorp, Inc.

First Security, Inc.5/22/2018
Dime Community

Stifel Financial Corp.

Business Bancshares, Inc. Tompkins Financial Corporation5/10/2018

Capitol Federal Financial, Institutions,Inc.

Capital City Bancshares, Inc. TriState Capital Holdings, Inc.4/30/2018
First of Long Island

National Commerce Corporation

 TrustCo Bank Corp NYLandmark Bancshares, Inc.4/24/2018
Flushing

QCR Holdings, Inc.

Springfield Bancshares, Inc.4/18/2018

Triumph Bancorp, Inc.

First Bancorp of Durango, Inc.4/9/2018

Civista Bancshares, Inc.

United Community Bancorp3/12/2018

Heritage Financial Corporation

Premier Commercial Bancorp3/8/2018

RCB Holding Company, Inc.

Central Bank and Trust Co.3/6/2018

First Choice Bancorp

Pacific Commerce Bancorp2/26/2018

Hilltop Holdings Inc.

Bank of River Oaks2/13/2018

Mechanics Bank

Learner Financial Corporation WSFS Financial Corporation2/12/2018
Kearny

Park National Corporation

NewDominion Bank1/23/2018

CNB Bank Shares, Inc.

Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.1/18/2018

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

First Priority Financial Corp. 1/16/2018

Mackinac Financial Corporation

First Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, I1/16/2018

Heritage Commerce Corp

United American Bank1/11/2018

The analysis compared publicly available financial information for OceanFirst with the corresponding data for the OceanFirst peerRegional group as of or for the twelve months ended March 31, 2016 (unless otherwise indicated), with pricing data as of July 11, 2016.

Sandler O’Neill’s analysis showed the following information regarding the financial performance of OceanFirst and the OceanFirst peer group.

Financial Data as of or for the Period Ending March 31, 2016  Balance Sheet  Capital Position  LTM Profitability  Valuation 
Pricing Data as of July 11, 2016                                Price/          
Company  City, State Ticker  Total
Assets
($mm)
  Loans/
Deposits
(%)
  NPAs1/
Total
Assets
(%)
  TCE/
TA
(%)
  Leverage
Ratio
(%)
  Total
RBC
Ratio
(%)
  ROAA
(%)
  ROATCE
(%)
  Net
Interest
Margin
(%)
  Efficiency
Ratio (%)
  Tang.
Book
Value
(%)
  LTM
EPS
(x)
  2016
Est.
EPS
(x)
  2017
Est.
EPS
(x)
  Current
Dividend
Yield
(%)
  LTM
Dividend
Ratio
(%)
  Market
Value
($mm)
 

Flushing Financial Corporation

  Uniondale, NY  FFIC    5,813    109.7    0.62    8.14    8.65    13.07    0.85    10.4    3.02    59.6    128    12.8    14.0    13.0    3.3    40.1    603  

Tompkins Financial Corporation

  Ithaca, NY  TMP    5,765    83.9    0.39    7.66    8.79    13.18    1.08    14.7    3.36    62.3    228    16.6    16.9    15.8    2.7    43.3    988  

WSFS Financial Corporation

  Wilmington, DE  WSFS    5,685    93.9    0.69    9.01    10.23    12.64    1.07    12.1    3.84    57.6    197    17.5    15.1    13.5    0.7    11.5    991  

Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.

  Brooklyn, NY  DCOM    5,517    147.0    0.21    8.87    10.97    13.61    1.72    19.2    2.89    47.5    131    7.6    13.3    12.7    3.2    24.7    650  

Beneficial Bancorp, Inc.

  Philadelphia, PA  BNCL    4,815    89.8    0.30    19.64    20.58    31.14    0.48    2.5    2.85    76.4    109    NM    NM    30.3    NA    0.0    984  

TrustCo Bank Corp NY

  Glenville, NY  TRST    4,763    79.7    0.97    8.87    8.95    19.14    0.89    10.2    3.11    55.6    147    14.8    15.1    14.4    4.0    59.7    621  

Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc.

  Olney, MD  SASR    4,717    104.3    0.82    9.46    10.23    14.02    0.98    10.4    3.44    62.4    163    16.1    15.9    14.9    3.2    50.0    707  

Kearny Financial Corp.

  Fairfield, NJ  KRNY    4,486    102.2    0.73    24.12    24.58    39.51    0.18    0.8    2.29    71.2    115    NM    NM    NM    0.6    75.0    1,216  

Lakeland Bancorp, Inc.

  Oak Ridge, NJ  LBAI    4,404    97.2    0.82    7.45    8.33    10.87    0.84    11.0    3.46    61.3    149    13.9    11.9    10.5    3.3    41.0    512  

Bancorp, Inc.

  Wilmington, DE  TBBK    4,380    27.9    1.85    7.11    6.98    14.56    0.05    1.0    2.16    96.8    74    NM    NM    9.3    NA    0.0    230  

ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

  Englewood Cliffs, NJ  CNOB    4,091    112.8    2.89    8.25    8.66    11.36    1.09    13.3    3.50    41.2    147    11.7    11.4    9.8    1.9    22.1    479  

Bridge Bancorp, Inc.

  Bridgehampton, NY  BDGE    3,914    84.4    0.10    6.27    7.11    13.19    0.75    12.0    3.50    55.0    210    19.8    13.6    12.1    3.2    63.9    499  

Northfield Bancorp, Inc.

  Woodbridge, NJ  NFBK    3,673    107.4    0.91    15.65    15.92    20.69    0.56    3.3    2.87    64.6    128    35.8    27.3    24.6    2.1    66.7    726  

Oritani Financial Corp.

  Township of
Washington, NJ
  ORIT    3,603    137.0    0.30    14.67    15.23    17.96    1.62    10.6    3.07    42.0    139    12.6    18.4    18.0    4.3    93.0    735  

Financial Institutions, Inc.

  Warsaw, NY  FISI    3,517    71.4    0.13    6.40    7.46    13.39    0.87    13.8    3.25    62.0    174    13.6    14.1    13.2    3.0    41.2    383  

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

  Bedminster, NJ  PGC    3,466    99.5    0.70    8.09    8.19    11.57    0.62    7.8    2.79    61.7    110    14.7    14.1    13.2    1.0    15.3    314  

TriState Capital Holdings, Inc.

  Pittsburgh, PA  TSC    3,400    105.1    0.69    8.35    8.83    13.36    0.74    9.0    2.33    65.2    142    16.9    14.8    12.2    NA    0.0    397  

First of Long Island Corporation

  Glen Head, NY  FLIC    3,234    90.3    0.15    8.05    7.92    14.21    0.90    10.8    2.95    50.4    162    15.8    14.6    12.9    2.7    42.0    463  

Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation

  Bryn Mawr, PA  BMTC    3,058    101.5    0.50    8.10    8.76    12.13    0.59    8.3    3.78    62.3    207    28.9    13.8    12.5    2.8    79.8    482  
    High    5,813    147.0    2.89    24.12    24.58    39.51    1.72    19.2    3.84    96.8    228    35.8    27.3    30.3    4.3    93.0    1,216  
    Low    3,058    27.9    0.10    6.27    6.98    10.87    0.05    0.8    2.16    41.2    74    7.6    11.4    9.3    0.6    0.0    230  
    Mean    4,332    97.1    0.72    10.22    10.86    16.29    0.84    9.5    3.08    60.8    150    16.8    15.3    14.6    2.6    40.5    630  
    Median    4,380    99.5    0.69    8.25    8.79    13.39    0.85    10.4    3.07    61.7    147    15.3    14.4    13.1    2.9    41.2    603  

OceanFirst(²)

  Toms River, NJ   4,093    99.1    2.01    8.28    11.06    12.45    0.76    8.3    3.27    63.8    144    16.2    13.4    10.8    2.8    45.2    479  

(1)Nonperforming assets defined as nonaccrual loans and leases, renegotiated loans and leases, and real estate owned.
(2)Total assets, loans/deposits, Tangible Common Equity/Total Assets, Leverage Ratio, Total RBC and Price/Tangible Book Value presented on a pro forma basis for acquisitions completed in the second quarter of 2016 and an estimated $130 million balance sheet deleveraging. Data provided by OceanFirst senior management.

Source: SNL Financial

Analysis of Selected Merger Transactions

Sandler O’Neill reviewed two groups of recent merger and acquisition transactions. The first group consisted of all bank and thrift transactions announced between January 1, 2014 and July 11, 2016 with respect to which the transaction value was publicly available and the target had total assets at announcement between $500 million and $1.5 billion, the target’s one-to-four family loans as a percentage of total loans was greater than 40%, and the target’s last twelve months return on average assets was greater than 0% (which we refer to as the “Nationwide Precedent Transactions”).

The Nationwide Precedent Transactions group was composed of the following ten transactions:

 

BuyerAcquirer Company

 

TargetCompany Acquired

Berkshire Hills Bancorp Inc. First Choice BankDate Announced
Horizon Bancorp

Citizens & Northern Corporation

 La Porte

Monument Bancorp, Inc.

MainSource Financial Group

 Cheviot Financial Corp.9/28/2018
BNC

Lakeland Bancorp, Inc.

 Southcoast Financial Corp.
Liberty Bank

Highlands Bancorp, Inc.

 Naugatuck Valley Financial Corp.8/23/2018
Camden National Corp.

ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

 SBM Financial Inc.
HomeStreet Inc.

Greater Hudson Bank

 Simplicity7/12/2018

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

Independent Bank Corp.

 Peoples Federal Bancshares Inc.
National Penn Bancshares Inc.

First Priority Financial Corp.

 TF Financial Corp.1/16/2018
IBERIABANK Corp.

Old Line Bancshares, Inc.

 Teche Holding Company

Bay Bancorp, Inc.

9/27/2017

Riverview Financial Corporation

CBT Financial Corporation

4/20/2017

Sussex Bancorp

Community Bank of Bergen County, NJ

4/11/2017

Old Line Bancshares, Inc.

DCB Bancshares, Inc.

2/1/2017

Using the latest publicly available information prior to the announcement of the relevant transaction, Sandler O’Neill reviewed the following transaction metrics: transaction price to last twelve months earnings per share, transaction price to tangible book value, tangible book premium to core deposits and the one day market premium. Sandler O’Neill compared the indicated transaction metrics for the Transactions to the median and mean metrics of the Nationwide Precedent Transactions group.

            Transaction Information  Seller Information  

 

 
Acquiror  

St

 

Target

 St Annc.
Date
  Deal
Value
($mm)
  Price/
LTM
Earnings
(x)
  TBV
(%)
  Core
Deposit
Premium
(%)
  1-Day
Market
Premium
(%)
  Total
Assets
($mm)
  TCE/
TA
(%)
  LTM/
ROAA
(%)
  NPAs(1)/
Assets
(%)
  1-4 Fam/
Loans
(%)
 
 Berkshire Hills Bancorp Inc.   MA First Choice Bank NJ  06/27/16    117.8    57.8    116    2.4    —      1,124.7    4.5    0.18    3.52    40.7  
 Horizon Bancorp   IN La Porte Bancorp Inc IN  03/10/16    94.1    18.6    116    4.9    9.8    543.2    14.4    0.89    NA    49.1  
 MainSource Financial Group   IN Cheviot Financial OH  11/24/15    107.4    60.2    123    5.4    8.7    576.6    15.2    0.30    NA    53.2  
 BNC Bancorp   NC Southcoast Financial Corp. SC  08/14/15    95.5    18.2    189    14.8    48.5    505.6    10.0    1.12    1.64    56.2  
 Liberty Bank   CT Naugatuck Valley Finl CT  06/04/15    77.8    35.5    126    5.3    18.8    507.0    12.1    0.41    1.47    47.3  
 Camden National Corp.   ME SBM Financial Inc. ME  03/30/15    134.9    NM    157    8.7    —      806.2    10.6    0.22    1.61    51.4  
 HomeStreet Inc.   WA Simplicity Bancorp Inc CA  09/29/14    132.9    24.7    98    NM    7.1    879.2    15.2    0.62    1.99    40.1  
 Independent Bank Corp.   MA Peoples Federal Bancshares Inc MA  08/05/14    130.6    60.0    123    7.3    11.9    606.2    17.1    0.35    0.30    64.3  
 
 
National Penn
Bancshares Inc.
 
  
 PA TF Financial Corp. PA  06/04/14    141.6    19.0    148    7.7    35.6    846.0    11.0    0.83    1.20    63.4  
 IBERIABANK Corp.   LA Teche Holding Company LA  01/13/14    157.8    17.1    173    12.5    32.4    856.7    10.0    1.03    0.74    59.9  
     High    157.8    60.2    189    14.8    48.5    1,124.7    17.1    1.12    3.52    64.3  
     Low    77.8    17.1    98    2.4    7.1    505.6    4.5    0.18    0.30    40.1  
     Mean    119.0    34.6    137    7.7    21.6    725.1    12.0    0.60    1.56    52.6  
     Median    124.2    24.7    125    7.3    15.3    706.2    11.5    0.52    1.54    52.3  
  OceanFirst/Ocean Shore(2)    147.7    20.0    132    5.2    31.8    1,052.1    10.4    0.65    1.01    77.1  

(1)Nonperforming assets defined as nonaccrual loans and leases, renegotiated loans and leases, and real estate owned.
(2)Based on transaction value of $22.40. Deal value does not include estimated reduction in shares outstanding associated with Ocean Shore ESOP debt extinguishment.

Source:SNL Financial

The secondPerformance group of transactions consisted of regional savings bank and thrift transactions announced between January 1, 2014 and July 11, 2016, with respect to which the deal value was publicly available and the target was headquartered in the Mid-Atlantic Region and had total assets at announcement of between $500 million and $2.0 billion (which we refer to as the “Regional Precedent Transactions”).

The Regional Precedent Transactions group was composed of the following seven transactions:

 

BuyerAcquirer Company

 

TargetCompany Acquired

OceanFirst Financial Corp. Cape Bancorp, Inc.Date Announced
Univest Corp. of Pennsylvania

First Bancshares, Inc.

 Fox Chase Bancorp Inc.
Beneficial Bancorp Inc.

FMB Banking Corporation

 Conestoga Bank7/24/2018
Community Bank System

Business First Bancshares, Inc.

 Oneida Financial Corp.
WesBanco

Richland State Bancorp, Inc.

 ESB Financial Corp.6/4/2018
Cape Bancorp, Inc.

National Commerce Corporation

 Colonial Financial Services
National Penn

Landmark Bancshares, Inc.

 TF4/24/2018

First Foundation Inc.

PBB Bancorp

12/19/2017

Equity Bancshares, Inc.

Kansas Bank Corporation

12/18/2017

Suncrest Bank

CBBC Bancorp

11/7/2017

First Bancshares, Inc.

Southwest Banc Shares, Inc.

10/24/2017

Triumph Bancorp, Inc.

Valley Bancorp, Inc.

7/26/2017

Glacier Bancorp, Inc.

Columbine Capital Corporation

6/6/2017

Seacoast Commerce Banc Holdings

Capital Bank

5/2/2017

First Merchants Corporation

Arlington Bank

1/25/2017

Simmons First National Corporation

Hardeman County Investment Company, Inc.

11/17/2016

CenterState Banks, Inc.

Platinum Bank Holding Company

10/18/2016

State Bank Financial Corp.Corporation

NBG Bancorp, Inc.

4/5/2016

UsingFor each selected transaction, Boenning derived the latestfollowing implied transaction statistics, in each case based on the transaction consideration value paid for the acquired company and using financial data based on the acquired company’s then-latest publicly available information priorfinancial statements:

Price per common share to the announcementTBV per common share of the relevantacquired company;

Price per common share to LTM core EPS (excludes extraordinary items, nonrecurring revenues/expenses, gain/loss on sale of securities and amortization of intangibles);

Core deposit premium;

Price per common share to total assets per share;

Price per common share to deposits per share; and

TBV multiple of the acquirer to deal TBV multiple.

The above transaction Sandler O’Neill reviewedstatistics for the selected transactions were compared with the corresponding transaction statistics for the merger based on the implied transaction value for the merger of $84.6 million and using preliminary historical financial information for Capital Bank as of or for the LTM ended June 30, 2018 provided by Capital Bank’s management.

The results of the analysis are set forth in the following transaction metrics: transaction price to last twelve months earnings per share, transaction price to tangible book value, tangible book premium to core deposits and the one day market premium. Sandler O’Neill compared the indicated transaction metrics for the Transactions to the median and mean metrics of the Regional Precedent Transactions group.tables:

National group

 

           Transaction Information  Seller Information  

 

 

Acquiror

 

St

 

Target

 

St

 Annc.
Date
  Deal
Value
($mm)
  Price/
LTM
Earnings
(x)
  TBV
(%)
  Core
Deposit
Premium
(%)
  1-Day
Market
Premium
(%)
  Total
Assets
($mm)
  TCE/
TA
(%)
  LTM
ROAA
(%)
  NPAs(1)/
Assets
(%)
  1-4 Fam/
Loans
(%)
 

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

 NJ Cape Bancorp Inc. NJ  01/05/16    205.7    17.2    139    5.3    19.7    1,563.2    9.4    0.85    1.07    41.8  

Univest Corp. of Pennsylvania

 PA Fox Chase Bancorp Inc. PA  12/08/15    244.3    23.2    134    10.5    10.9    1,098.8    16.0    0.91    1.11    12.8  

Beneficial Bancorp Inc

 PA Conestoga Bank PA  10/22/15    100.1    24.5    160    9.2    —      719.0    8.7    0.59    0.92    23.7  

Community Bank System Inc.

 NY Oneida Financial Corp. NY  02/24/15    142.1    27.4    202    11.6    56.3    798.2    9.0    0.66    0.17    32.8  

WesBanco Inc.

 WV ESB Financial Corp. PA  10/29/14    352.7    19.8    207    18.3    49.1    1,945.4    8.7    0.91    1.04    48.5  

Cape Bancorp Inc.

 NJ Colonial Financial Services NJ  09/10/14    55.8    NM    88    NA    11.3    550.7    11.5    (0.13  4.29    56.2  

National Penn Bancshares Inc.

 PA TF Financial Corp. PA  06/04/14    141.6    19.0    148    7.7    35.6    846.0    11.0    0.83    1.20    63.4  
     High    352.7    27.4    207    18.3    56.3    1,945.4    16.0    0.91    4.29    63.4  
     Low    55.8    17.2    88    5.3    10.9    550.7    8.7    (0.13  0.17    12.8  
     Mean    177.5    21.8    154    10.4    30.5    1,074.5    10.6    0.66    1.40    39.9  
     Median    142.1    21.5    148    9.9    27.6    846.0    9.4    0.83    1.07    41.8  
  OceanFirst/OceanShore(2)    147.7    20.0    132    5.2    31.8    1,052.1    10.4    0.65    1.01    77.1  
   OceanFirst /
Capital
Bank
Merger
   10th Percentile   Median   90th percentile 

Deal Value to Tangible Book Value (%)

   189.6    134.2    173.5    222.5 

Deal Value to LTM Core Earnings (%)

   15.1    15.9    28.9    34.9 

Core Deposit Premium (%)

   10.7    6.1    11.1    17.7 

Deal Value to Assets (%)

   16.8    12.3    16.8    21.7 

Deal Value to Deposits (%)

   19.5    14.4    20.0    24.0 

TBV Multiple of Buyer / TBV Multiple of Deal (x)

   0.99    1.55    1.09    0.98 

Regional group

   OceanFirst /
Capital
Bank
Merger
   10th Percentile   Median   90th percentile 

Deal Value to Tangible Book Value (%)

   189.6    131.3    160.0    197.0 

Deal Value to LTM Core Earnings (%)

   15.1    21.4    31.7    34.7 

Core Deposit Premium (%)

   10.7    4.8    7.6    12.4 

Deal Value to Assets (%)

   16.8    11.2    13.1    16.6 

Deal Value to Deposits (%)

   19.5    13.4    16.4    18.6 

TBV Multiple of Buyer / TBV Multiple of Deal (x)

   0.99    1.38    1.10    0.98 

Performance group

   OceanFirst /
Capital
Bank
Merger
   10th Percentile   Median   90th percentile 

Deal Value to Tangible Book Value (%)

   189.6    153.2    199.0    222.2 

Deal Value to LTM Earnings (%)(1)

   17.0    15.6    18.5    25.0 

Core Deposit Premium (%)

   10.7    7.0    10.3    17.6 

Deal Value to Assets (%)

   16.8    14.5    16.7    20.3 

Deal Value to Deposits (%)

   19.5    16.7    19.5    23.5 

TBV Multiple of Buyer / TBV Multiple of Deal (x)

   0.99    1.33    1.11    0.90 

 

(1)Nonperforming assets defined

Core earnings are not shown as nonaccrual loans and leases, renegotiated loans and leases, and real estate owned.

(2)Based ononly one comparable transaction value of $22.40. Deal value does not include estimated reduction in shares outstanding associated with Ocean Shore ESOP debt extinguishment.disclosed price/ LTM core earnings.

Source:SNL Financial
No company or transaction used as a comparison in the above selected transactions analysis is identical to Capital Bank or the merger. Accordingly, an analysis of these results is not mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies involved.

Capital Bank Net Present Value AnalysesAnalysis.

Sandler O’Neill Boenning performed an analysis that estimated the net present value per share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, assuming Ocean ShoreCapital Bank performed in accordance with publicly available analystmanagement provided projections for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019 and cash dividend and long-term annual earnings per share estimatesgrowth rate assumptions for Ocean ShoreCapital Bank for the years ending December 31, 2016 and2020 through December 31, 2017 of $1.13 and $1.14 per share, respectively, as well as an internal estimated earnings growth rate of 4% annually for the years ending December 31, 2018 through 2020, as discussed with the senior management of Ocean Shore. The analysis also assumed that Ocean Shore’s regular cash dividend remained at $0.24 per share annually through the year ending December 31, 2020.2023. To approximate the terminal value of Ocean Shorea share of Capital Bank common stock at December 31, 2020, Sandler O’Neill2023, Boenning applied price to 2023 earnings multiples ranging from 11.0x to 15.0x with a midpoint of 13.0x and price to 18.0x and multiples ofDecember 31, 2023 tangible book value ratios ranging from 90%1.21x to 140%.1.45x with a midpoint of 1.33x. The terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount rates ranging from 9.0% to 15.0%, which were derived from a capital asset pricing model and chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of Ocean Shore’s common stock. As illustrated in the following tables, the analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share of Ocean Shore common stock of $9.44 to $16.31 when applying earnings multiples and $10.75 to $20.85 when applying multiples of tangible book value.

Earnings Per Share Multiples

Discount Rate

  13.0x   14.0x   15.0x   16.0x   17.0x   18.0x 
9.0%  $12.05    $12.91    $13.76    $14.61    $15.46    $16.31  
10.0   11.56     12.38     13.19     14.01     14.82     15.64  
11.0   11.09     11.87     12.66     13.44     14.22     15.00  
12.0   10.65     11.40     12.15     12.89     13.64     14.39  
13.0   10.23     10.94     11.66     12.38     13.10     13.81  
14.0   9.82     10.51     11.20     11.89     12.58     13.26  
15.0   9.44     10.10     10.76     11.42     12.08     12.74  

Tangible Book Value Multiples

Discount Rate

  90%   100%   110%   120%   130%   140% 
9.0%  $13.75    $15.17    $16.59    $18.01    $19.43    $20.85  
10.0   13.18     14.54     15.90     17.26     18.62     19.99  
11.0   12.64     13.95     15.25     16.56     17.86     19.16  
12.0   12.13     13.38     14.63     15.88     17.13     18.38  
13.0   11.65     12.85     14.05     15.24     16.44     17.64  
14.0   11.19     12.34     13.49     14.63     15.78     16.93  
15.0   10.75     11.85     12.95     14.06     15.16     16.26  

Sandler O’Neill also considered and discussed with the Ocean Shore board how this analysis would be affected by changes in the underlying assumptions, including variations with respect to net income. To illustrate this impact, Sandler O’Neill performed a similar analysis, assuming Ocean Shore’s net income varied from 20% above estimates to 20% below estimates. This analysis resulted in the following range of per share values for Ocean Shore common stock, applying the price to earnings multiple range of 13.0x to 18.0x referred to above and a discount rate of 13.99%.13.0%, which was determined using the average of the Capital Asset Pricing Model,Build-Up Method, and comparable company returns on tangible common equity. The following tables illustrate an implied valuation range based on EPS growth and Terminal multiples.

Illustrative Net Present Value Sensitivity to Earnings Growth and EPS Multiple

2023 Earnings Per Share Multiples

 

Annual Estimate
Variance

  13.0x   14.0x   15.0x   16.0x   17.0x   18.0x 

(20.0%)

  $8.04    $8.59    $9.14    $9.69    $10.24    $10.79  

(15.0%)

   8.49     9.07     9.66     10.24     10.83     11.41  

(10.0%)

   8.93     9.55     10.17     10.79     11.41     12.03  

  (5.0%)

   9.38     10.03     10.69     11.34     12.00     12.65  

   0.0%

   9.83     10.52     11.20     11.89     12.58     13.27  

   5.0%

   10.28     11.00     11.72     12.44     13.17     13.89  

 10.0%

   10.72     11.48     12.24     12.99     13.75     14.51  

 15.0%

   11.17     11.96     12.75     13.55     14.34     15.13  

 20.0%

   11.62     12.44     13.27     14.10     14.92     15.75  

Growth Rate

  11.0x   12.0x   13.0x   14.0x   15.0x 

3.0%

  $18.82   $20.38   $21.94   $23.50   $25.07 

5.0%

   20.25    21.94    23.62    25.31    27.00 

7.0%

   21.76    23.58    25.40    27.22    29.04 

9.0%

   23.37    25.33    27.29    29.24    31.20 

11.0%

   25.06    27.17    29.27    31.38    33.49 

Sandler O’Neill alsoIllustrative Net Present Value Sensitivity to Earnings Growth and Tangible Book Multiple

2023 Tangible Book Multiples

Growth Rate

  1.21x   1.27x   1.33x   1.39x   1.45x 

3.0%

  $20.58   $21.52   $22.46   $23.40   $24.33 

5.0%

   20.94    21.89    22.85    23.80    24.75 

7.0%

   21.31    22.28    23.25    24.22    25.19 

9.0%

   21.70    22.68    23.67    24.66    25.64 

11.0%

   22.10    23.11    24.11    25.11    26.11 

Pro Forma Financial Impact Analysis.Boenning performed ana pro forma financial impact analysis that estimated the net present value per sharecombined projected income statement and balance sheet information of OceanFirst common stock, assuming thatand Capital Bank. Using closing balance sheet estimates as of March 31, 2019 for OceanFirst performed in accordance with publicly availableand Capital Bank provided by Capital Bank’s management, EPS consensus mean analyst“street estimates” for OceanFirst for fiscal years 2018 and 2019, assumed long-term earnings per share estimates forgrowth rates provided by Capital Bank’s management, and pro forma assumptions (including, without limitation, the year ending December 31, 2016 (adjusted for one-timecost savings and related expenses expected to be incurred in connection withresult from the closing of the Cape acquisition) and December 31, 2017 of $1.24 and $1.74, respectively, as well as internal estimated earnings growth of 8% annually for the years ending December 31, 2018 through 2020, as discussed with the senior management of OceanFirst. The analysis also assumed that OceanFirst’s annual cash dividends per share for the years ending December 31, 2016 through 2018 matched consensus mean analyst estimates of $0.52, $0.55 and $0.60, respectively, and that the dividend payout ratio approximated 30% for each of the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020. To approximate the terminal value of OceanFirst common stock at December 31, 2020, Sandler O’Neill applied price to earnings multiples ranging from 12.0x to 17.0x and multiples of December 31, 2020 tangible book value ranging from 100% to 175%. The terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 14.0%, which were derived from a capital asset pricing model and chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of OceanFirst common stock. As illustrated in the following tables, the analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share of OceanFirst common stock of $16.10 to $28.12 when applying earnings multiples and $12.43 to $25.88 when applying multiples of tangible book value.

Earnings Per Share Multiples

Discount Rate

  12.0x   13.0x   14.0x   15.0x   16.0x   17.0x 

     8.0%

  $20.53    $22.05    $23.57    $25.08    $26.60    $28.12  

  9.0

   19.70     21.15     22.60     24.05     25.50     26.95  

10.0

   18.90     20.29     21.68     23.07     24.46     25.85  

11.0

   18.15     19.48     20.81     22.14     23.47     24.80  

12.0

   17.43     18.70     19.98     21.26     22.53     23.81  

13.0

   16.75     17.97     19.19     20.42     21.64     22.86  

14.0

   16.10     17.27     18.44     19.62     20.79     21.96  

Tangible Book Value Multiples

Discount Rate

  100%   115%   130%   145%   160%   175% 

     8.0%

  $15.79    $17.81    $19.82    $21.84    $23.86    $25.88  

  9.0

   15.16     17.09     19.02     20.95     22.88     24.81  

10.0

   14.55     16.40     18.25     20.10     21.95     23.80  

11.0

   13.98     15.75     17.52     19.29     21.07     22.84  

12.0

   13.44     15.13     16.83     18.53     20.23     21.92  

13.0

   12.92     14.55     16.17     17.80     19.43     21.05  

14.0

   12.43     13.99     15.55     17.11     18.67     20.23  

Sandler O’Neill also considered and discussed with the Ocean Shore board how this analysis would be affectedmerger) provided by changes in the underlying assumptions, including variations with respect to net income. To illustrate this impact, Sandler O’Neill performed a similar analysis assuming OceanFirst’s net income varied from 20% above estimates to 20% below estimates. This analysis resulted in the following range of per share values for OceanFirst common stock, applying the price to earnings multiple range of 12.0x to 17.0x referred to above and a discount rate of 12.11%.

Earnings Per Share Multiples

Annual Estimate
Variance

  12.0x   13.0x   14.0x   15.0x   16.0x   17.0x 

(20.0%)

  $14.30    $15.32    $16.33    $17.35    $18.37    $19.38  

(15.0%)

   15.06     16.14     17.22     18.30     19.38     20.46  

(10.0%)

   15.83     16.97     18.11     19.26     20.40     21.54  

  (5.0%)

   16.59     17.80     19.00     20.21     21.42     22.62  

   0.0%

   17.35     18.62     19.89     21.16     22.43     23.70  

   5.0%

   18.11     19.45     20.78     22.11     23.45     24.78  

 10.0%

   18.88     20.27     21.67     23.07     24.46     25.86  

 15.0%

   19.64     21.10     22.56     24.02     25.48     26.94  

 20.0%

   20.40     21.92     23.45     24.97     26.50     28.02  

In connection with its analyses, Sandler O’Neill considered and discussed with the OceanFirst board how the present value analyses would be affected by changes in the underlying assumptions. Sandler O’Neill noted that the net present value analysis is a widely used valuation methodology, but the results of such methodology are highly dependent upon the numerous assumptions that must be made, and the results thereof are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results.

Pro Forma Merger Analysis

Sandler O’Neill analyzed certain potential pro forma effects of the Transactions, based on the following assumptions: (i) the Transactions close in the fourth quarter of 2016; (ii) each outstanding Ocean Shore share is converted into the merger consideration, consisting of 0.9667 shares of OceanFirst common stock and cash of $4.35 per share; (iii) all outstanding Ocean Shore options are converted into OceanFirst options in accordance with the merger agreement; and (iv) OceanFirst’s closing stock price of $18.67 as of July 11, 2016. Sandler O’Neill also utilized the following: (a) publicly available consensus mean analyst earnings per share estimates for OceanFirst for the years ending December 31, 2016 (adjusted for one-time expenses expected to be incurred in connection with the closing of the Cape acquisition) and December 31, 2017 of $1.24 and $1.74, respectively, as well as internal estimated earnings growth of 8% annually for the years ending December 31, 2018 through 2020, as discussed with the senior management of OceanFirst, (b) publicly available consensus mean analyst estimates of OceanFirst’s annual cash dividends per share forBoenning analyzed the years ending December 31, 2016 through 2018 of $0.52, $0.55 and $0.60, respectively, and a dividend payout ratio of approximately 30% for eachestimated financial impact of the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020 and (c) transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments, cost savings and a core deposit intangible asset, as well as estimated net income projections (in millions) of $6.8, $7.1, $7.9, $8.4, $9.0 and $9.7 for the years ending December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively, as provided by and discussed with the senior management of OceanFirst. Themerger on certain projected financial results. This analysis indicated that the Transactions wouldmerger could be accretive to OceanFirst’s 2019 and 2020 estimated earnings per share (excluding one-time transaction costs and expenses) for each year inEPS. Furthermore, the analysis. The analysis also indicated that, the Transactions would be approximately 3.1% dilutive to estimated tangible book value per share at close, which would be earned back in approximately 3.5 years using the crossover method of analysis. The pro forma analysis also indicated thatfor the Transactions wouldmerger, OceanFirst’s tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio, leverage ratio, common equity Tier 1 ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and total risk-based capital ratio at closing could be over 100% accretive to dividends for an Ocean Shore stockholder.

In connection with this analysis, Sandler O’Neill considered and discussed with the Ocean Shore board how the analysis would be affected by changes in the underlying assumptions, including the impact of final purchase accounting adjustments determined at the closingabove well capitalized levels. For all of the transaction, and noted thatabove analysis, the actual results achieved by OceanFirst following the combined companymerger may vary from the projected results, and the variations may be material.

Sandler O’Neill’s RelationshipMiscellaneous.

Sandler O’NeillBoenning acted as the financial advisor to the Ocean Shore boardCapital Bank in connection with the Transactionsmerger and will receive a transaction feedid not act as an advisor to or agent of any other person. As part of its investment banking business, Boenning is continually engaged in the valuation of bank and bank holding company securities in connection with acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for various other purposes. As specialists in the Transactionssecurities of banking companies, Boenning has experience in, an amount equal to approximately $1.5 million, all of which is subject to and due upon the closingknowledge of, the Transactions. Sandler O’Neill also received a feevaluation of $200,000 upon rendering its fairness opinion. Ocean Shore has also agreed to indemnify Sandler O’Neill against certain claims and liabilities arising out of its engagement and to reimburse Sandler O’Neill for certain of its out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its engagement. In the two years preceding the date of its opinion, Sandler O’Neill did not provide any investment banking services to Ocean Shore for which it received compensation.enterprises. In the ordinary course of Sandler O’Neill’s business as aits and their broker-dealer Sandler O’Neillbusinesses, and further to certain existing sales and trading relationships between Capital Bank and certain Boenning affiliates, Boenning and its affiliates may from time to time purchase securities from, and sell securities to, Ocean Shore,Capital Bank and OceanFirst, and their respective affiliates. Sandler O’Neillas a market maker in securities, Boenning and its affiliates may also actively trade thefrom time to time have a long or short position in, and buy or sell, debt or equity and debt securities of Ocean Shore andCapital Bank or OceanFirst or their respective affiliates for its and their own accountaccounts and for the accounts of its customers.and their respective customers and clients. Boenning employees and employees of Boenning affiliates may also from time to time maintain individual positions in Capital Bank common stock and OceanFirst common stock, which positions currently include an individual position in shares of Capital Bank common stock held by a senior member of the Boenning advisory team providing services to Capital Bank in connection with the merger.

As Sandler O’Neill previously advisedPursuant to the Ocean Shore board, Sandler O’Neill maintainsBoenning engagement agreement, Capital Bank agreed to pay Boenning a businessnon-refundable cash fee equal to 1.20% of the aggregate merger consideration, $15,000 of which became payable upon retention of

Boenning, $50,000 of which became payable concurrently with the rendering of Boenning’s opinion and the balance of which is contingent upon the consummation of the merger. Boenning’s fee for rendering the fairness opinion was not contingent upon Boenning reaching any particular conclusion. Capital Bank also agreed to reimburse Boenning for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses and disbursements incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify Boenning against certain liabilities relating to or arising out of Boenning’s engagement or Boenning’s role in connection therewith.

Boenning has not had any material relationship with OceanFirst andduring the past two years in which compensation was received or was intended to be received. Boenning has provided certainno investment banking services to OceanFirst and received fees for such services. InCapital Bank during the past two years precedingin which compensation was received or was intended to be received. Boenning may provide services to OceanFirst in the future (and/or to Capital Bank if the merger is not consummated), although as of the date of itsBoenning’s opinion, Sandler O’Neill advised OceanFirst in its acquisition of Cape and on the sale of certain mortgage servicing rights, for which it received fees totaling approximately $1.6 million, and (ii) Sandler O’Neill Mortgage Finance L.P., an affiliate of Sandler O’Neill, acted as introducing brokerthere is no agreement to OceanFirst in connection with OceanFirst’s sale of certain non-performing assets, for which it received fees of approximately $280,000. Sandler O’Neill also advised the Ocean Shore board that Sandler O’Neill would likely be engaged to serve as an underwriter in a subordinated debt offering that was then under consideration by OceanFirst. OceanFirst subsequently conducted a subordinated debt offering that was completed on September 21, 2016 for which Sandler O’Neill served as book-running manager and received fees totaling $420,000 and reimbursement of expenses totaling $120,000. OceanFirst has not retained Sandler O’Neill to provide any future services, other than the broker-dealer related services described above. Although OceanFirst may do so in the future, including during the pendency of the Transactions, OceanFirst and Sandler O’Neill currentlynor any mutual understanding that such services are not in discussions for the provision of future services.contemplated.

OceanFirst’s Reasons for the Transactions; Recommendation of the OceanFirst BoardMerger

After careful consideration, the OceanFirst board, at a meeting held on July 12, 2016,October 24, 2018, unanimously approved the merger agreement. Accordingly, the OceanFirst board unanimously recommends that OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuance proposal.

In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, the integrated mergersmerger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and to recommend that its stockholders approve the OceanFirst share issuance, the OceanFirst board evaluated the merger agreement and the Transactionsmerger in consultation with OceanFirst management, as well as OceanFirst’s legal counsel and financial advisor, and considered a number of factors in favor of the Transactions,merger, including the following material factors, which are not presented in order of priority:

 

the fact that the Transactions are expected to create the preeminent New Jersey based community banking franchise operating throughout Central and Southern New Jersey and the combined company would be able to leverage the synergy created by the Transactions to create one of the most highly valued banking institutions in the Mid-Atlantic region;

the fact that the Transactions aremerger is expected to strengthen OceanFirst’s position as one of the largest bankand oldest community-based financial institutions headquartered in CentralNew Jersey;

the fact that the merger is expected strengthen and expand OceanFirst’s presence in Southern New Jersey;Jersey and the Philadelphia metro market;

each of OceanFirst’s and Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s businesses, operations, financial condition, asset quality, earnings and prospects, including the view of the OceanFirst board that Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s business and operations complementprovide a complementary addition to OceanFirst’s existing operations and lines of business;

 

the fact that Capital Bank’s expertise in serving small and medium sized businesses aligns with OceanFirst’s commitment to growing its commercial banking platform, and provides an opportunity to leverage OceanFirst’s broader product offering across Capital Bank’s client base;

there is potential for significant efficiencies to be accelerated as a result of the merger through infrastructure optimization and branch consolidation;

the fact that the Transactions willmerger is expected to enhance OceanFirst’s operating scaleaccess to strong core,low-cost and core deposit funding base at attractive pricing;liquid funding;

 

the fact that the merger is expected to result in earnings per share accretion of approximately 2.0% in 2020 (the first full year of combined operations and synergies);

the current and prospective environment in which OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank operate, including national, regional and local economic conditions, the competitive environment for financial institutions generally and the likely effect of these factors on OceanFirst both with and without the Transactions;merger;

 

its review and discussions with OceanFirst’s management and its legal counsel and financial advisor concerning the due diligence investigation of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and the potential financial impact of the Transactionsmerger on the combined company;

 

management’s expectation that OceanFirst will retain its strong capital position upon completion of the Transactions;merger;

the financial presentation, dated July 12, 2016, of Piper to the OceanFirst board and the opinion, dated July 12, 2016, of Piper to the OceanFirst board as to the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of the opinion, to OceanFirst of the merger consideration, as more fully described below under the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “— Opinion of OceanFirst’s Financial Advisor;”

the terms of the merger agreement, including the expected tax treatment and deal protection and termination fee provisions, which it reviewed with OceanFirst’s outside legal and financial advisors; and

 

the regulatory and other approvals required in connection with the Transactionsmerger and the expectation that such regulatory and other approvals will be received in a timely manner and without the imposition of unacceptable conditions.

The OceanFirst board also considered potential risks associated with the Transactionsmerger in connection with its deliberations of the Transactions,merger, including (i) the potential risk of diverting management attention and resources from the operation of OceanFirst’s business and towards the completion of the Transactions;merger; (ii) the potential risks associated with achieving anticipated cost synergies and savings and successfully integrating Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s business, operations and workforce with those of OceanFirst; and (iii) the other risks identified in the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 27[●] and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 34.[●].

The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the OceanFirst board is not intended to be exhaustive, but, rather, includes the material factors considered by the OceanFirst board. In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, the integrated mergersmerger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The OceanFirst board did not quantify or assign any relative weights to the factors considered, and individual directors may have given different weights to different factors. The OceanFirst board considered all these factors as a whole and overall considered the factors to be favorable to, and to support, its determination. It should be noted that this explanation of the OceanFirst board’s reasoning and all other information presented in this section is forward-looking in nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the factors discussed under the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 34.[●].

For the reasons set forth above, the OceanFirst approved the merger agreement. The OceanFirst board unanimously recommends that the OceanFirst stockholders vote “FOR” the OceanFirst share issuance proposal and “FOR” the OceanFirst adjournment proposal.

OpinionInterests of OceanFirst’s Financial Advisor

Pursuant to an engagement letter dated April 8, 2016, the OceanFirst board engaged Piper as financial advisor to OceanFirst in connection with OceanFirst’s consideration of a possible business combination involving OceanFirstCapital Bank’s Directors and Ocean Shore. Piper is a nationally recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in transactions similar to the business combination and is familiar with OceanFirst and its business. As part of its investment banking business, Piper is routinely engagedExecutive Officers in the valuationMerger

When Capital Bank stockholders are considering the recommendation of financial services companies and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions. The Piper written opinion, dated July 12, 2016, is sometimes referred to in this section as the “Piper opinion.”

Piper acted as financial advisor to OceanFirstCapital Bank board in connection with the proposed Transactions and participated in certainmerger proposal, they should be aware that some of the negotiations leadingdirectors and executive officers of Capital Bank have interests that are in addition to, or different from, the executioninterests of the merger agreement. At the meetingCapital Bank stockholders generally. The Capital Bank board was aware of the OceanFirst board held on July 12, 2016, Piper delivered to the OceanFirst board its oral opinion, followed by delivery of its written opinion, that, as of such date,these interests and based upon and subject to the various factors, assumptions and limitations set forth in its opinion, the merger consideration to be paid pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to OceanFirst.

The full text of Piper’s written opinion dated July 12, 2016, which sets forth,considered them, among other things, the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters, considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken in rendering its opinion, is attached asAnnex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. Piper’s opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion. You are urged to read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. Piper’s opinion was addressed to, and provided for the information and benefit of, the OceanFirst board (in its capacity as such) in connection with its evaluation of the fairness of the merger consideration to OceanFirst from a financial point of view, and did not address any other aspects or implications of the Transactions. The opinion does not constitute a recommendation to the OceanFirst board or to any other persons in respect of the Transactions, including as to how any holder of OceanFirst common stock should vote at any stockholders’ meeting held in connection with the Transactions or take, or not to take, any action in respect of the Transactions. Piper’s opinion does not address the relative merits of the Transactions as compared to any other business or financial strategies that might be available to OceanFirst, nor does it address the underlying business decision of OceanFirst to engage in the Transactions. The issuance of the Piper opinion was approved by the fairness opinion committee of Piper. The summary of the opinion of Piper set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. Piper has consented to the inclusion of this summary of its opinion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

In rendering its opinion, Piper reviewed and analyzed, among other things:

the financial terms contained in a draft of the merger agreement dated as of July 11, 2016;

certain financial and other data with respect to OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, which was publicly available or made available to Piper by OceanFirst or Ocean Shore;

certain forward-looking information relating to OceanFirst and Ocean Shore that was publicly available, as well as that was furnished to Piper by OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, including internal forecasts prepared or reviewed by OceanFirst of OceanFirst’s and Ocean Shore’s expected operating results on a stand-alone basis (as described below on pages 82 and 85);

materials detailing the merger prepared by OceanFirst, Ocean Shore and by their respective legal and accounting advisors including the estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and related expenses and purchase accounting adjustments expected to result from the merger (which we refer to in this section as the “Synergies”);

current and historical reported prices and trading activity of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore and similar information for certain other publicly traded companies deemed by Piper to be comparable to OceanFirst and Ocean Shore;

the financial performance of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore compared with that of certain other publicly traded companies that Piper deemed relevant;

certain financial analyses for OceanFirst on a pro forma combined basis giving effect to the integrated mergers based on assumptions relating to the Synergies;

the merger consideration relative to the historical trading price of Ocean Shore and Ocean Shore’s tangible book value, core deposits (deposits less all jumbo time deposits) and last twelve months earnings as of March 31, 2016, projected earnings for the year ending 2016 and 2017 and projected earnings for the year ending 2017 assuming the cost savings to be achieved have been fully phased in as OceanFirst projects;

the current market environment generally and the depository banking environment in particular;

the financial terms of certain business combination transactions in the depository banking industry that Piper deemed relevant; and

such other analyses, examinations and inquiries and considered such other financial, economic and market criteria as Piper deemed necessary in arriving at its opinion.

Piper also held several discussions with certain members of senior management and representatives of both OceanFirst and Ocean Shore with respect to certain aspects of the Transactions, and the past and current business operations of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, the financial condition and future prospects and operations of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, and certain other matters Piper believed necessary or appropriate to its inquiry.

In arriving at its opinion, Piper relied upon and assumed, without assuming liability or responsibility for independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly available or was furnished, or otherwise made available to, or discussed with or reviewed by Piper. Piper further relied upon the assurances of the management of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore that the financial information provided was prepared on a reasonable basis in accordance with industry practice, and that they are not aware of any information or facts that would make any information provided to Piper materially incomplete or misleading. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Piper assumed that with respect to financial forecasts, estimates and other forward-looking information (including the Synergies) reviewed by Piper, that such information was reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore as to the expected future results of operations and financial condition of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, respectively, to which such financial forecasts, estimates and other forward-looking information (including the Synergies) relate and Piper assumed that such results would be achieved. Piper expressed no opinion as to any such financial forecasts, estimates or forward-looking information (including the Synergies) or the assumptions on which they were based. Piper further assumed that the integrated mergers will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes. Piper also expressed no opinion as to any of the legal, accounting and tax matters relating to the merger and any other transactions contemplated in connection therewith.

In arriving at its opinion, Piper assumed that the executed merger agreement will be in all material respects identical to the last draft reviewed by it. Piper relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that:

the representations and warranties of all parties toapproving the merger agreement and all other related documents and instruments that are referred to therein are true and correct;

each party to such agreements will fully and timely perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by such party;

the integrated mergers will be consummated pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement without amendments thereto; and

all conditions to the consummation of the integrated mergers will be satisfied without waiver by any party of any conditions or obligations thereunder.

Additionally, Piper assumed that all the necessary regulatory approvals and consents required for the Transactions will be obtained in a manner that will not adversely affect OceanFirst and Ocean Shore or the contemplated benefits of the Transactions.

For purposes of rendering its opinion, Piper did not perform any appraisals or valuations of any specific assets or liabilities (fixed, contingent, derivative, off-balance sheet, or other) of OceanFirst or Ocean Shore, and was not furnished or provided with any such appraisals or valuations, and did not evaluate the solvency of OceanFirst or Ocean Shore under any state or federal law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. Accordingly, Piper expressed no opinion regarding the liquidation value of OceanFirst, Ocean Shore or any other entity. Piper assumed that there was no material change in the respective assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of OceanFirst or Ocean Shore since the date of the most recent financial data made available to Piper. Piper also assumed in all respects material to its analysis that OceanFirst and Ocean Shore would remain as a going concern for all periods relevant to its analysis. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Piper did not conduct a review of:

any individual credit files of OceanFirst or Ocean Shore, nor evaluate the adequacy of the loan or lease reserves of OceanFirst or Ocean Shore;

any credit mark that may be taken in connection with the integrated mergers, nor evaluate the adequacy of any contemplated credit mark to be so taken; or

the collectability of any asset or the future performance of any loan of OceanFirst or Ocean Shore.

Piper also assumed, with OceanFirst’s consent, that the respective allowances for loan and lease losses for both OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, and the credit mark, are adequate to cover any losses and will be adequate on a pro forma basis for the combined company. Accordingly, Piper expressed no opinion with respect to these matters.

In addition, Piper did not make any independent analysis of any pending or threatened litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which OceanFirst or Ocean Shore is a party or may be subject, and at the direction of OceanFirst and with its consent, Piper’s opinion makes no assumption concerning, and therefore does not consider, the possible assertion of claims, outcomes or damages arising out of any such matters. Piper also assumed that neither OceanFirst nor Ocean Shore is party to any material pending transaction, including without limitation any financing, recapitalization, acquisition or merger, divestiture or spin-off, other than the Transactionstransactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

The Piper opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions and upon the information made available to Piper and facts and circumstances as they exist and are subject to evaluation as of the date of the Piper opinion. It should be understood that events occurring after the date of the Piper opinion could materially affect the assumptions used in preparing the Piper opinion. Further, Piper expressed no opinion as to the price at which shares of the common stock of OceanFirst or Ocean Shore may trade following announcement of the Transactions or atdiscussion describes any future time.

The Piper opinion addresses solely the fairness, from a financial point of view, to OceanFirst of the merger consideration set forthinterests in the merger agreement and does not address any other termsof each person who has served as a director or agreement relatingan executive officer of Capital Bank since January 1, 2017. Except as described below, to the Transactions. Piper was not requested to opine as to, andknowledge of Capital Bank, the Piper opinion does not address, (i) the basic business decision to proceed with or effect the Transactions; (ii) the merits of the Transactions relative to any alternative transaction or business strategy that may be available to OceanFirst; (iii) any other terms contemplated by the merger agreement; or (iv) the fairness of the Transactions to, or any consideration received in connection therewith by, any creditor or other constituency of OceanFirst. Furthermore, Piper expressed no opinion with respect to the amount or nature of compensation to be paid in the Transactions to any officer, director or employee of any party to the Transactions, or any class of such persons, relative to the merger consideration to be paid to any other stockholder in the Transactions or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation, including whether such payments are reasonable in the context of the Transactions.

In performing its analyses, Piper made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, which are beyond the control of Piper, OceanFirst and Ocean Shore. Any estimates contained in the analyses performed by Piper are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. Additionally, estimates of the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which such businesses or securities might actually be sold. Accordingly, these analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty. In addition, the Piper opinion was among several factors taken into consideration by the OceanFirst board in making its determination to approve the merger agreement. The type and amount of consideration payable in the Transactions were determined solely through negotiation between OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, and the decision to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of the OceanFirst board.

Piper’s opinion was necessarily based upon conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on July 12, 2016, the date of such opinion, and the information made available to Piper through such date. Developments subsequent to the date of Piper’s opinion may have affected, and may affect, the conclusion reached in Piper’s opinion, and Piper did not and does not have an obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed and presented by Piper to the OceanFirst board on July 12, 2016 in connection with its fairness opinion. Each analysis was provided to the OceanFirst board of directors. The following summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of all the analyses performed and reviewed by Piper underlying the Piper opinion or the presentation made by Piper to the OceanFirst board on July 12, 2016, but summarizes the material analyses performed and presented in connection with such opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytic process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. A fairness opinion is thus not susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Piper did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor that it considered, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor.

The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Accordingly, Piper believes that its analyses and the summary of its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on the information presented below in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a potentially misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses and opinion. Also, no company or transaction used in Piper’s analysis for purposes of comparison is identical to OceanFirst and Ocean Shore or the Transactions. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of the comparisons is not mathematical; rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments about differences in the companies and transactions to which OceanFirst and Ocean Shore and the Transactions were compared and other factors that could affect the public trading value or transaction value of the companies to which they are being compared. Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data that existed on or before July 11, 2016, and is not necessarily indicative of current market conditions.

Summary of Proposal.Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, each share of Ocean Shore common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be converted into the right to receive (a) $4.35 in cash and (b) 0.9667 shares of OceanFirst common stock. Based on OceanFirst’s closing price on July 11, 2016 of $18.67, the merger consideration was equivalent to a price of $22.40 per share of Ocean Shore common stock at that date. Based on this deemed value per share to Ocean Shore stockholders and based upon 6,412,678 shares of common stock outstanding, or 6,296,735 shares net of Ocean Shore’s employee stock ownership plan related adjustments, as well as all options to purchase shares of Ocean Shore common stock outstanding converted into

options to purchase shares of OceanFirst common stock at an exchange ratio of 1.2084, the aggregate merger consideration was approximately $145.1 million on July 11, 2016.

Transaction Price / Tangible Book Value Per Share

132.0

Core Deposit Premium(1)

4.9

Transaction Price / LTM Earnings Per Share

20.0

Transaction Price / 2016E Earnings Per Share(2)

20.5

Transaction Price / 2017E Earnings Per Share(3)

19.8

Transaction Price / 2017E Earnings Per Share with Estimated Cost Synergies(4)

9.2

Market Premium as of 7/11/2016

31.8

(1)Core deposits are defined as total deposits as of March 31, 2016 less jumbo deposits.
(2)Ocean Shore estimated 2016 earnings provided by and discussed with OceanFirst senior management.
(3)Ocean Shore estimated 2017 earnings provided by and discussed with OceanFirst senior management.
(4)Ocean Shore estimated 2017 earnings with estimated cost saves provided by and discussed with OceanFirst senior management, inclusive of after-tax cost savings (if cost saves were to be fully phased-in).

Selected Companies Analysis. Using publicly available information, Piper compared the financial performance, financial condition and market performance of OceanFirst to ten selected publicly traded bank holding companies headquartered in the Mid-Atlantic with total assets between $3.25 billion and $5.0 billion, a last twelve months return on average assets between 0.25% and 1.75%, nonperforming assets to assets ratio less than 3.0%, and excluding merger targets (publicly announced) and mutual holding companies (“MHCs”). The companies included in this group were:

Company

TickerState

Beneficial Bancorp, Inc.

BNCLPA

TrustCo Bank Corp NY

TRSTNY

Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc.

SASRMD

Lakeland Bancorp, Inc.

LBAINJ

ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

CNOBNJ

Bridge Bancorp, Inc.

BDGENY

Northfield Bancorp, Inc.

NFBKNJ

Oritani Financial Corp.

ORITNJ

Financial Institutions, Inc.

FISINY

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

PGCNJ

Using publicly available information, Piper compared the financial performance, financial condition and market performance of Ocean Shore to sixteen selected publicly traded bank holding companies headquartered in the Mid-Atlantic with total assets between $950 million and $1.25 billion, a last twelve months return on average assets between 0.25% and 1.75%, nonperforming assets to assets ratio less than 3.0%, and excluding merger targets (publicly announced) and MHCs. The companies included in this group were:

Company

TickerState

Citizens & Northern Corporation

CZNCPA

Citizens Financial Services, Inc.

CZFSPA

Community Financial Corporation

TCFCMD

Revere Bank

REVBMD

ACNB Corporation

ACNBPA

Shore Bancshares, Inc.

SHBIMD

Adirondack Trust Company

ADKTNY

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

ASRVPA

Unity Bancorp, Inc.

UNTYNJ

Franklin Financial Services Corporation

FRAFPA

Somerset Trust Holding Company

SOMEPA

QNB Corp.

QNBCPA

Evans Bancorp, Inc.

EVBNNY

First Keystone Corporation

FKYSPA

1st Summit Bancorp of Johnstown, Inc.

FSMKPA

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

MPBPA

To perform this analysis, Piper used financial information as of and for the period ended March 31, 2016 (or as of the most recently available quarter). Market price information was as of July 11, 2016. Earnings estimates for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 for OceanFirst, Ocean Shore and other selected companies were taken from SNL Financial, a nationally recognized earnings estimate consolidator.

Piper’s analysis showed the following concerning the selected public companies for OceanFirst’s market performance:

   OCFC  OCFC
Group 25th
Percentile
  OCFC
Group
Median
  OCFC
Group 75th
Percentile
 

Stock Price / Tangible Book Value per Share(1)

   146.6  130.6  146.9  158.1

Core Deposit Premium(1)

   5.1  5.1  6.3  8.2

Stock Price / Last Twelve Months EPS(2)

   14.6  13.4  14.3  15.1

Stock Price / 2016 Est. EPS

   12.5  13.2  13.9  15.3

Stock Price / 2017 Est. EPS

   10.8  12.2  13.0  14.8

(1)OceanFirst estimated pro forma for acquisition of Cape Bancorp, Inc.
(2)Excludes non-recurring transaction charges associated with Cape Bancorp, Inc. acquisition.

Piper’s analysis showed the following concerning the selected public companies for Ocean Shore’s market performance:

   OSHC  OSHC
Group 25th
Percentile
  OSHC
Group
Median
  OSHC
Group 75th
Percentile
 

Stock Price / Tangible Book Value per Share

   100.1  101.5  119.3  135.7

Core Deposit Premium

   0.0  0.2  1.9  4.0

Stock Price / Last Twelve Months EPS

   15.2  10.3  13.3  16.8

Stock Price / 2016 Est. EPS

   15.0  14.7  15.4  15.7

Stock Price / 2017 Est. EPS

   14.9  13.1  14.3  14.9

Comparable Transaction Analysis. Piper reviewed certain publicly available information related to eleven selected acquisitions of banks and bank holding companies as well as thrifts and thrift holding companies with headquarters in the Mid-Atlantic announced after January 1, 2013, where deal value was available and the buyer was a bank or bank holding company or a thrift or thrift holding company, the seller was not an MHC and had total assets between $800 million and $2 billion, a last twelve months return on average assets between 0.25% and 1.75%, and a nonperforming assets to assets ratio less than 3.0%. The transactions included in the group were:

Acquiror

Acquiree

Investors Bancorp, Inc.

Bank of Princeton

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

Cape Bancorp, Inc.

Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania

Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.

United Bankshares, Inc.

Bank of Georgetown

Bridge Bancorp, Inc.

Community National Bank

S&T Bancorp, Inc.

Integrity Bancshares, Inc.

WesBanco, Inc.

ESB Financial Corporation

National Penn Bancshares, Inc.

TF Financial Corporation

Center Bancorp, Inc.

ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Provident Financial Services, Inc.

Team Capital Bank

Peoples Financial Services Corp.

Penseco Financial Services Corporation

Transaction multiples for the Transactions were derived based on an offer price of $22.40 per share for Ocean Shore based on OceanFirst’s July 11, 2016 closing price of $18.67. For each precedent transaction, Piper derived and compared, among other things, the implied ratio of price per common share paid for the acquired company to:

tangible book value per share of the acquired company based on the latest financial statements of the company available prior to the announcement of the acquisition;

tangible equity premium to core deposits (total deposits less jumbo time deposits) based on the latest financial statements of the company available prior to the announcement of the acquisition;

the last twelve months earnings per share based on the latest financial statements of the company available prior to the announcement of the acquisition;

the current year earnings per share estimate of the acquired company, if available, from SNL Financial, a nationally recognized earnings estimate consolidator;

the forward year earnings per share estimate of the acquired company, if available, from SNL Financial, a nationally recognized earnings estimate consolidator; and

the stock price of the acquired company as of market close the day before the announcement of the acquisition.

The results of the analysis are set forth in the following table:

   OCFC /
OSHC
Merger1
  Comparable
Transactions
25th Percentile
  Comparable
Transactions
Median
  Comparable
Transactions

75th Percentile
 

Transaction Price / Tangible Book Value

   132.0  147.3  174.6  199.0

Core Deposit Premium

   4.9  8.5  9.7  15.0

Transaction Price / LTM Earnings Per Share

   20.0  17.9  19.8  23.0

Transaction Price / Current Year Earnings Per Share

   20.5  19.1  21.3  24.2

Transaction Price / Forward Year Earnings Per Share

   19.8  17.1  20.0  22.1

Market Premium

   31.8  15.4  22.7  39.0

(1)Ocean Shore estimated 2016E and 2017E earnings provided by and discussed with OceanFirst senior management.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Piper performed a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate a range of the present values of after-tax cash flows that OceanFirst could provide to equity holders through the year ending December 31, 2021 on a stand-alone basis. In performing this analysis, Piper used publicly available median analyst earnings estimates provided by SNL Financial for OceanFirst for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, with estimated earnings thereafter through the year ending December 31, 2022 based on estimated earnings growth between 8% and 9% annually, as provided by OceanFirst senior management. The analysis assumed discount rates ranging from 11.5% to 13.5%, which were assumed deviations, both up and down, as selected by Piper based on a discount rate of 12.4% as determined by Piper. The range of values for the discounted cash flow analysis was determined by adding (1) the present value of projected cash flows to OceanFirst’s stockholders from 2016 to 2021 and (2) the present value of the terminal value of OceanFirst’s common stock. In determining cash flows available to stockholders, Piper assumed that OceanFirst would maintain a tangible common equity to tangible asset ratio of 8.0% and would retain sufficient earnings to maintain these levels. Any earnings in excess of what would need to be retained were assumed to be distributed as dividends to OceanFirst stockholders. In calculating the terminal value of OceanFirst, Piper applied terminal multiples ranging from 12.0 times to 14.0 times 2022 estimated earnings. This resulted in a range of values of OceanFirst on a stand-alone basis from $20.57 to $25.19 per share.

Piper also performed a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate a range of the present values of after-tax cash flows that Ocean Shore could provide to equity holders through the year ending December 31, 2021 on a stand-alone basis. In performing this analysis, Piper used Ocean Shore earnings estimates as provided by OceanFirst senior management for the year ending December 31, 2016 through the year ending December 31, 2022 (as described below on page 84). The analysis assumed discount rates ranging from 11.5% to 13.5%, which were assumed deviations, both up and down, as selected by Piper based on a discount rate of 12.4% as determined by Piper. The range of values for the discounted cash flow analysis was determined by adding (1) the present value of projected cash flows to Ocean Shore’s stockholders from 2016 to 2021 and (2) the present value of the terminal value of Ocean Shore’s common stock. In determining cash flows available to Ocean Shore stockholders, Piper assumed that Ocean Shore would maintain a tangible common equity to tangible asset ratio of 8.0% and would retain sufficient earnings to maintain these levels. Any earnings in excess of what would need to be retained were assumed to be distributed as dividends to Ocean Shore stockholders. In calculating the terminal value of Ocean Shore, Piper applied terminal multiples ranging from 12.0 times to 14.0 times 2022 estimated earnings. This analysis resulted in a range of values of Ocean Shore from $17.17 to $20.12 per share.

Piper also performed an analysis that estimated the net present value per share of Ocean Shore common stock on a pro forma basis assuming that Ocean Shore performed in accordance with the earnings estimates provided by OceanFirst management (as described below on page 85), inclusive of estimated synergies associated with the Transactions. Piper utilized the same methodology as described in the Ocean Shore stand alone discounted cash flow analysis. The analysis assumed discount rates ranging from 11.5% to 13.5%, which were assumed deviations, both up and down, as selected by Piper based on a discount rate of 12.4% as determined by Piper. In calculating the terminal value of Ocean Shore, Piper applied terminal multiples ranging from 12.0 times to 14.0 times 2022 estimated earnings. This analysis resulted in a range of values of Ocean Shore from $27.18 to $32.76 per share.

Piper stated that the discounted cash flow present value analysis is a widely used valuation methodology but noted that it relies on numerous assumptions, including asset and earnings growth rates, terminal values and discount rates. The analysis did not purport to be indicative of the actual values or expected values of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst.

Financial Impact Analysis. Piper performed pro forma merger analyses that combined projected income statement and balance sheet information of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore. Assumptions regarding the accounting treatment, acquisition adjustments, related expenses and cost savings were used to calculate the financial impact that the Transactions would have on certain projected financial results of OceanFirst. In the course of this analysis, Piper used Ocean Shore earnings projections, as provided by OceanFirst’s senior management (as

described below on page 85), for the years ending December 31, 2016 through December 31, 2022 (including cost savings) and for OceanFirst used publicly available earnings estimates by research analysts covering OceanFirst for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 of $32 million (adjusted for one-time expenses to be incurred in connection with the closing of the Cape acquisition) and $45 million, respectively, with estimated earnings projections for years thereafter based on estimated earnings growth between 8% and 9% annually, as provided by OceanFirst’s senior management.This analysis indicated that the Transactions would be accretive to OceanFirst’s estimated earnings per share in 2017 (excluding transaction expenses) and 2018. The analysis also indicated that the Transactions would be 3.1% dilutive to tangible book value per share for OceanFirst with an earnback of 3.7 years. Additionally, OceanFirst is estimated to maintain well-capitalized ratios per regulatory guidelines. For all of the above analyses, the actual results achieved by OceanFirst following the Transactions may vary from the projected results, and the variations may be material.

Other Analyses. Among other things, Piper reviewed balance sheet composition and other financial data for OceanFirst and Ocean Shore. With respect to OceanFirst and Ocean Shore’s public price, Piper reviewed the public price targets of four research analysts covering OceanFirst as provided by Bloomberg Finance L.P., a nationally recognized research price target consolidator, which ranged from $21.00 to $24.00 per share. Piper also reviewed the public price target of the sole research analyst covering Ocean Shore as provided by Bloomberg Finance L.P., which was $20.00 per share. Piper also reviewed the historical trading performances of shares of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore’s common stock during the 52-week period ended July 11, 2016. OceanFirst’s common stock traded as low as $16.30 per share and as high as $20.94 per share, and the closing price of OceanFirst’s common stock on July 11, 2016 was $18.67 per share. Ocean Shore’s common stock traded as low as $14.73 per share and as high as $18.00 per share, and the closing price of Ocean Shore’s common stock on July 11, 2016 was $16.99 per share.

Piper’s Compensation and Other Relationships with OceanFirst. OceanFirst and Piper entered into an engagement letter dated April 8, 2016 relating to the services to be provided by Piper in connection with the Transactions. Pursuant to the engagement letter, OceanFirst agreed to pay Piper (a) a fee of $200,000 upon the delivery to the OceanFirst board of the written Piper opinion, which fee will be credited in full against the transaction fee; and (b) contingent upon closing of the Transactions, a transaction fee of $1,100,000. Pursuant to the Piper engagement letter, OceanFirst also agreed to reimburse Piper for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements incurred in connection with its retention. OceanFirst has also agreed to indemnify Piper against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of its engagement.

The Piper investment banking team that advised OceanFirst in connection with the Transactions also advised OceanFirst (while at a prior firm) in connection with OceanFirst’s acquisition of Colonial American Bank, which acquisition closed in July 2015. Piper has not provided any other material investment banking or financial advisory services to OceanFirst, Ocean Shore or their respective affiliates during the past two years; however, Piper may do so in the future, for which it would expect to receive compensation. In the ordinary course of Piper’s business as a broker-dealer, Piper may, from time to time, purchase securities from and sell securities to OceanFirst, Ocean Shore or their affiliates.

Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information of Ocean Shore

As part of OceanFirst’s due diligence review in connection with the Transactions, OceanFirst’s management provided Piper and Sandler O’Neill, in connection with their respective opinions, certain non-public, preliminary internal financial forecasts of Ocean Shore’s operating results, as projected by OceanFirst on the basis of OceanFirst’s own assumptions regarding the operations of Ocean Shore (which we refer to as the “Ocean Shore projections”). The accompanying prospective financial information was not prepared with a view toward public disclosure or with a view toward complying with the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants with respect to prospective financial information, but, in the view of OceanFirst’s management, was prepared on a reasonable basis, reflects the best currently available estimates and judgments, and presents, to the best of OceanFirst’s management’s knowledge and belief, the expected course of action and the expected future financial performance of Ocean Shore, as projected by OceanFirst on the basis of

OceanFirst’s own assumptions regarding the operations of Ocean Shore. However, this information is not fact and should not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of actual future results, and readers of this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the prospective financial information.

Neither OceanFirst’s independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the prospective financial information.

The Ocean Shore projections were prepared solely for internal use and are subjective in many respects. The Ocean Shore projections reflect numerous estimates and assumptions made with respect to business, economic, market, competition, regulatory and financial conditions and matters specific to the business of Ocean Shore, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore. The Ocean Shore projections reflect assumptions as to certain business decisions that are subject to change and, in many respects, subjective judgment, and thus are susceptible to multiple interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments. OceanFirst can give no assurance that the Ocean Shore projections and the underlying estimates and assumptions will be realized. In addition, because the Ocean Shore projections cover multiple years, the information by its nature becomes less predictive with each successive year. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth below, and important factors that may affect actual results and cause the Ocean Shore projections not to be realized include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties relating to the business of Ocean Shore, industry performance, general business and economic conditions, customer requirements, competition and adverse changes in applicable laws, regulations or policies. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ are further described in the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information,” “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 140, page 27 and page 34, respectively. Stockholders are urged to review Ocean Shore’s most recent SEC filings for a description of risk factors with respect to its business.

Furthermore, the Ocean Shore projections do not take into account any circumstances or events occurring after the date they were prepared. OceanFirst can give no assurance that, had the Ocean Shore projections been prepared either as of the date of the merger agreement or as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, similar estimates and assumptions would be used. OceanFirst does not intend to, and disclaims any obligation to, make publicly available any update or other revision to the Ocean Shore projections to reflect circumstances existing since their preparation or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, even in the event that any or all of the underlying assumptions are shown to be in error, or to reflect changes in general economic or industry conditions. The Ocean Shore projections do not give effect to any business or strategic decision or action that has been or will be taken as a result of the merger agreement having been executed, or the effect on Ocean Shore of any business or strategic decisions or actions that would likely have been taken if the merger agreement had not been executed, but which were instead altered, accelerated, postponed or not taken in anticipation of the Transactions. Further, the Ocean Shore projections do not take into account the effect on Ocean Shore of any possible failure of the Transactions to occur. None of OceanFirst, Ocean Shore or their respective affiliates, officers, directors, advisors or other representatives has made, makes or is authorized in the future to make any representation to any OceanFirst stockholder or Ocean Shore stockholder, or any other person, regarding Ocean Shore’s actual performance compared to the information contained in the Ocean Shore projections or that projected results will be achieved. The inclusion of the Ocean Shore projections should not be deemed an admission or representation by OceanFirst or Ocean Shore that it is viewed as material information of Ocean Shore, particularly in light of the inherent risks and uncertainties associated with such forecasts.

In light of the foregoing, and considering that the OceanFirst special meeting and the Ocean Shore special meeting will be held several months after the Ocean Shore projections were prepared, as well as the uncertainties inherent in any forecasted information, OceanFirst stockholders and Ocean Shore stockholders are cautioned not to place unwarranted reliance on such information in connection with their consideration of the OceanFirst share issuance proposal and the Ocean Shore merger proposal, as applicable.

The following unaudited prospective financial information with respect to Ocean Shore was provided to Piper and Sandler O’ Neill by senior management of OceanFirst.

   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021 

Ocean Shore Net Income (in Millions)

  $6.8    $7.1    $7.9    $8.4    $9.0    $9.7  

In addition to the years reflected in the table above, Piper used an estimated earnings growth rate of 8% from December 31, 2021, as provided by senior management of OceanFirst, to arrive at an estimated net income of $10.5 million for the year ending December 31, 2022.

Interests of Ocean Shore’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Transactions

In considering the recommendation of the Ocean Shore board of directors that you vote to approve the merger agreement, you should be aware that Ocean Shore’s directors and executive officers of Capital Bank do not have interestsany substantial interest, direct or indirect, by security holdings or otherwise, in the merger that are differentapart from or in addition to, thosetheir interests as stockholders of Ocean Shore’s stockholders generally.Capital Bank. The Ocean Shore board of directors was aware of and considered those interests, among other matters, in reaching its decisions to (i) approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (ii) resolve to recommend the approval of the merger agreement to Ocean Shore stockholders. Ocean Shore’s stockholders should take these interests into account in deciding whether to vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the merger agreement and whether to vote “FOR” the proposal to approve, by advisory (non-binding) vote, certain compensation arrangements for Ocean Shore’s named executive officers in connection with the merger. These interests are described in more detail below, and certain of them are quantifiedamounts presented in the narrative below andfollowing discussion do not reflect the table below.

Certain Assumptions

Except as otherwise specifically noted, for purposesimpact of quantifying the potential payments and benefits described in this section, the following assumptions, as well as those described in the footnotes to the table under the heading “— Quantification of Payments and Benefits to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers” below, were used:

The relevant price per share of Ocean Shore common stock is $21.71, which is the average closing price per share over the first five business days following the first public announcement of the merger agreement; and

The effective time of the first-step merger is assumed to occur on December 31, 2016 solely for purposes of the disclosure in this section, and each named executive officer is assumed to experience a qualifying termination of employment (as discussed below) on such date.

Treatment of Ocean Shore Equity Awards

Treatment of Stock Options. At the effective time of the first-step merger, each Ocean Shore stock option will fully vest and be converted into a stock option exercisable for that number of shares of OceanFirst common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) determined by multiplying (i) the number of shares of Ocean Shore common stock subject to the Ocean Shore stock option immediately prior to the effective time of the first-step merger by (ii) 1.2084, with an exercise price per share (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the per share exercise price for each share of Ocean Shore common stock subject to the Ocean Shore stock option by (B) 1.2084. Each Ocean Shore stock option assumed and converted will continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions (other than vesting conditions) as applicable immediately prior to the effective time of the first-step merger.withholding or other taxes.

Treatment of Restricted Stock Awards.

Capital Bank’s chairman of the board and its executive officers have received awards of shares of restricted stock from time to time since 2013. Award holders may not transfer unvested shares of restricted stock, but may vote and receive dividends on all shares of restricted stock, whether vested or unvested. At the effective time, of the first-step merger, each Ocean Shoreunvested share of restricted stock award will fully vest and the restrictions on those restricted stock awards will lapse, and each holder of restricted stock will be converted into the rightentitled to receive without interest, the merger consideration payable underin exchange for the merger agreement.cancellation of such shares.

QuantificationThe following table sets forth, as of ValueNovember 30, 2018, the number of Unvested Equity Awards. For an estimateshares of Capital Bank common stock underlying the valueunvested restricted stock awards held by the chairman and each executive officer of Capital Bank, as well as the OceanFirst shares to be received by each of Ocean Shore’s named executive officers in respect of their unvested Ocean Shore equity awards outstanding asthe merger in exchange for such shares.

   Shares Underlying
Restricted Stock Awards
(#)
   OceanFirst Shares to
Be Received in
Exchange (#)
 

Executive Officers

    

David J. Hanrahan

   22,500    28,125 

Thomas J. Lobosco

   6,700    8,375 

Joseph F. Rehm

   10,000    12,500 

Directors

    

Dominic J. Romano

   12,000    15,000 

Payments Under Employment Agreement Amendments with Capital Bank

In connection with the execution of the date hereof, assuming all such awards vest at the effective time of the first-step merger see “— Quantification of Paymentsagreement, Mr. Hanrahan, Mr. Lobosco and BenefitsMr. Rehm each entered into an amendment to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers” below. None of Ocean Shore’s non-employee directors hold any unvested Ocean Shore stock options or restricted stock.

Employment Agreement between Steven E. Brady and Ocean Shore

Ocean Shore maintains anhis respective existing employment agreement with Steven E. Brady,Capital Bank. OceanFirst Bank executed a joinder to each amendment agreeing to be bound by its President and Chief Executive Officer, that provides for the following severance benefits if, within two years after a change in control, Ocean Shore or its successor terminates Mr. Brady’s employment without cause or Mr. Brady voluntarily terminates employment “with good reason”:

a lump sum cash payment equal to 2.99 times the average of his annual compensation (including all taxable income plus any retirement contributions or benefits made or accrued on his behalf) over the five calendar years preceding the change in control;

the benefits he would have received under Ocean Shore’s retirement programs for a period of 36 months (with the amount of such benefits determined by the benefits received by him or accrued on his behalf during the 12 months preceding the change in control); and

continued health, life and disability insurance coverage for a period of 36 months.

The employment agreement with Mr. Brady provides that upon Mr. Brady’s termination of employment at or after attaining age 60 for any reason other than cause, Ocean Shore will continue health insurance coverage for Mr. Brady and his spouse through the date that each of them attain age 65 and that, thereafter, Ocean Shore will fund the cost of Medicare supplement coverage for Mr. Brady and his spouse for the remainder of their respective lives.

Under the employment agreement with Mr. Brady, any payments or benefits payable to him would be reduced to the extent that such payments or benefits would result in the imposition of excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code, unless Mr. Brady would be better off on an after-tax basis receiving all such payments or benefits.

As described below in “— Agreements with OceanFirst,” it is anticipated that Mr. Brady will enter into a separation and consulting agreement with OceanFirst that will beterms effective as of the effective timetime. Pursuant to their respective employment agreements, as amended:

Subject to Mr. Hanrahan’s signing a release on or after the closing date, Mr. Hanrahan will be entitled to receive a $721,200 payment with respect to severance and benefits within 15 days after the effective time. Mr. Hanrahan will also be entitled to receive a $250,000 retention andnon-compete payment on the earlier of (i) the date five days prior to the first anniversary of the first-step merger. The separation and consulting agreementeffective time or (ii) the first payroll date following his termination of employment by either the executive or OceanFirst Bank for any reason or no reason;

Subject to Mr. Lobosco’s signing a release on or after the closing date, Mr. Lobosco will provide for paymentsbe entitled to receive a $562,900 payment with respect to severance and benefits thatand a $100,000non-compete payment each within 15 days after the effective time; and

Subject to Mr. Rehm’s signing a release on or after the closing date, Mr. Rehm will be made in full satisfactionentitled to receive a $371,400 payment with respect to severance and benefits within 15 days after the effective time. Mr. Rehm will also be entitled to receive a $300,000 retention andnon-compete payment on the earlier of (i) the date five days prior to the first anniversary of the effective time or (ii) the first payroll date following his termination of employment by either the executive or OceanFirst Bank for any reason or no reason.

These payments will be subject to applicable tax withholdings. If the merger agreement is terminated prior to the effective time, these amendment agreements will expire and be of no further effect and the terms of the executives’ existing employment agreements will be reinstated.

Golden Parachute Compensation

The following table shows the estimated amounts of payments that Mr. Brady’s rights under his employment agreementHanrahan, Mr. Lobosco and Mr. Rehm will be entitled to receive in connection with his termination thereunder. The separation and consulting agreement will also set forth the terms and conditions of Mr. Brady’s consulting arrangementmerger, under their respective employment agreements, as amended, with OceanFirst and his role as a director of OceanFirst and include non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions. The potential payments payable by OceanFirst under the separation and consulting agreement will only become payable after the effective time of the first-step merger. See “Quantification of Payments and Benefits to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers” for the anticipated value of the payments and benefits that will be made to Mr. BradyCapital Bank (and, as of the effective time and consummation of the first-step merger.

Change in Control Agreements between Other Executive Officersmerger, OceanFirst Bank). The below assumes consummation of the merger occurred on November 30, 2018 and Ocean Shore

Ocean Shore maintains change in control agreements with all of its executive officers (other than Mr. Brady), that provide for severance benefits in the event of a termination of employment by Ocean Shore (or a successor) without cause or a resignation by the executive for “good reason” within one year following the change in control (which we refer to as a “qualifying termination”).

The agreements provide that, in the event ofeach individual incurred a qualifying termination each executive officer of Ocean Shore would be entitled to the following severance benefits:on such date.

 

Name

  Cash(1)
($)
   Other(2)
($)
   Total
($)
 

David J. Hanrahan

   721,200    250,000    971,200 

Thomas J. Lobosco

   562,900    100,000    662,900 

Joseph F. Rehm

   371,400    300,000    671,400 

a lump sum cash payment equal to three times (for Paul J. Esposito, Ocean Shore’s Senior Vice President

(1)

Cash. Column includes the aggregate dollar value of the cash payments with respect to severance and benefits payable to each individual. The amounts in this column are payable within 15 days after the effective time and consummation of the merger, but the above table assumes the cash payments are paid at closing.

(2)

Other. Column includes the aggregate dollar value of retention and noncompete payments payable to each individual. With respect to Mr. Hanrahan and Mr. Rehm, the amounts in this column are payable no later than the earlier of (i) five (5) days prior to the first anniversary of the effective time of the merger or (ii) the first payroll date after termination of employment from OceanFirst Bank, but the above table assumes these payments are paid at closing. With respect to Mr. Lobosco, the amount in this column is payable within 15 days after the effective time and consummation of the merger, but the above table assumes the cash payment is paid at closing.

Indemnification and Chief Risk Officer, two times) his or her average taxable income over the five years preceding the year in which the change in control occurs;Insurance of Directors and

continued health and welfare insurance coverage for a period of 36 months (for Mr. Esposito, 24 months) following the qualifying termination.

Under the change in control agreements, any payments or benefits payable to the executive officer will be reduced to the extent that such payments or benefits would result in the loss of deductibility to Ocean Shore under Section 280G of the Code and imposition of excise taxes on the executive officer under Section 4999 of the Code. Officers

See “— Quantification of Payments and BenefitsPursuant to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers” below for the value of these payments and benefits for each of Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers. For Mr. Esposito, assuming a qualifying termination as of the effective time of the first-step merger, the value of his lump sum cash payment would be $359,133, and the value of continued health and welfare insurance coverage for 24 months would be $38,300.

As described below in “— Agreements with OceanFirst,” it is anticipated that Janet M. Bossi, Ocean Shore’s Executive Vice President, and Kim M. Davidson, Ocean Shore’s Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary, will enter into arrangements with OceanFirst effective as of the effective time of the first-step merger that will provide for certain payments in lieu of the lump sum cash payment under their change in control agreements and set forth their new positions at OceanFirst following the effective time of the first-step merger.

Salary Continuation Agreements

Ocean Shore maintains salary continuation agreements with each of Ocean Shore’s executive officers, other than Donald F. Morgenweck, Ocean Shore’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Esposito, to provide them with additional compensation at retirement. Under their salary continuation agreements, these executive officers will receive an annual benefit (the normal retirement benefit) payable in monthly installments upon termination of employment after having reached the normal retirement age specified in the agreement. A reduced benefit is payable if the executive officer retires prior to the normal retirement age. The early termination benefit equals the normal retirement benefit multiplied by a fraction based on the executive’s years of service. If, following a change in control, the executive officer terminates employment prior to normal retirement age, other than for cause, the executive officer will be entitled to the normal retirement benefit, payable beginning in the month following termination of employment. Mr. Brady has not reached normal retirement age under his supplemental salary continuation agreement and Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson have not reached normal retirement age under their salary continuation agreements and, therefore, the merger will entitle them to an enhanced benefit if they terminate employment following the merger. See “— Quantification of Payments and Benefits to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers” below for the value of the enhanced benefits to which Mr. Brady, Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson will be entitled.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Ocean Shore maintains a supplemental executive retirement plan in which Mr. Brady is the only participant. This plan provides for a benefit if a change in control occurs prior to the complete scheduled payment of the employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) acquisition loans. The amount of the benefit equals the total number of shares of Ocean Shore common stock that would have been allocated to Mr. Brady under the ESOP had he remained employed through the last scheduled payment on all outstanding ESOP acquisition loans, minus the number of shares allocated to Mr. Brady as of the change in control. See “— Quantification of Payments and Benefits to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers” below for the value of the benefit to which Mr. Brady will be entitled under this plan.

Agreements with OceanFirst

It is anticipated that Mr. Brady will enter into a separation and consulting agreement with OceanFirst that will set forth Mr. Brady’s entitlements and continuing obligations in connection with his termination of employment with Ocean Shore and Ocean City Home Bank following the effective time of the first-step merger and his service as a non-employee director of and consultant to OceanFirst. It is also anticipated that Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson will each enter into arrangements with OceanFirst that will set forth their new positions at OceanFirst following the effective time of the first-step merger. All arrangements entered into with OceanFirst will be effective as of the effective time of the first-step merger.

Separation and Consulting Agreement — Mr. Brady.The separation and consulting agreement will provide for a consulting term of 18 months and a consulting fee of $4,167 per month. During the consulting period, OceanFirst anticipates that Mr. Brady will provide services and advice regarding the integration of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst, as well as transition planning in his role as Vice Chairman of the Southern Division of OceanFirst. If Mr. Brady’s service is terminated by OceanFirst before the end of the consulting term, he will be entitled to continued payment of the monthly consulting fees for the remainder of the consulting period. In addition, the separation and consulting agreement provides Mr. Brady with use of a company-owned vehicle, reimbursement of associated expenses and the payment of annual golf club dues during the consulting period. In no event will the total compensation paid to Mr. Brady by OceanFirst for his services as a director and a consultant to OceanFirst and its affiliates exceed $195,000 in any single twelve (12) month period.

The agreement provides that Mr. Brady will be subject to restrictive covenants in favor of OceanFirst, including an indefinite restriction on the disclosure of confidential information, an agreement not to disparage OceanFirst and non-competition and non-solicitation covenants. The non-competition and non-solicitation covenants apply until 36 months following the termination or the expiration of the consulting period.

Arrangements with Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson.The agreements forMs. Bossi and Ms. Davidson will provide for Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson to waive their right to receive a lump sum cash payment under their change in control agreements in the event of a qualifying termination and set forth their new positions at OceanFirst following the effective time of the first-step merger. In addition, the agreements will provide for transaction bonuses and retention payments for Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson. Ms. Bossi will be eligible to receive a transaction bonus payable at the time of the first-step merger equal to approximately $175,000 and a cash retention payment equal to $490,000 payable in increments over thirty months following the first-step merger. Ms. Davidson will be eligible to receive a transaction bonus payable at the time of the first-step merger equal to approximately $490,000 and a cash retention payment equal to $235,000 payable in increments over eighteen months following the first-step merger. The payment of their respective retention amounts will be accelerated on a termination of employment of Ms. Bossi or Ms. Davidson without cause or for “good reason” during the applicable retention period provided that they comply with non-competition and non-solicitation covenants applicable for the remainder of the retention period. Following the effective time of the first-step merger, Ms. Bossi will serve as Senior Vice President — Residential/Commercial Lending of OceanFirst and Ms. Davidson will serve as Senior Vice President — Southern Division Retail of OceanFirst.

Split-Dollar Insurance Agreements

Ocean Shore maintains split dollar life insurance agreements with Mr. Brady, Ms. Bossi, Ms. Davidson and Anthony J. Rizzotte, Ocean Shore’s Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer, that provide that the executive officer’s designated beneficiary will receive a portion of the proceeds of certain life insurance policies covering the executive officer if the executive officer dies while employed by Ocean Shore. Under the terms of the agreements, if the executive officer terminates employment and qualifies as an eligible retiree or terminates employment other than for cause following a change in control, the agreement will continue in effect unless mutually terminated; provided, however, that the split dollar life insurance agreements will terminate as of the date that the executive officer has been paid all benefits to which he or she is entitled under his or her salary continuation agreement. Mr. Brady and Mr. Rizzotte are eligible retirees under the split dollar life insurance

agreements; accordingly, the merger has no impact on the continuation of their split dollar life insurance agreements. If Ms. Bossi or Ms. Davidson terminate employment following the effective time of the first-step merger, their split dollar life insurance agreements will remain in effect unless mutually terminated.

See “— Quantification of Payments and Benefits to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers” below for the present value of the value of the insurance coverage that would be provided to Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson through the date on which they attain normal retirement age under their split dollar life insurance agreements.

Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance

Under the terms of the merger agreement, OceanFirst has agreed, following the effective time of the first-step merger, towill indemnify and hold harmless alleach present and former directors, officers and employeesofficer, director or employee of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and its subsidiaries against allany costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, losses, damages or liabilities incurred in connection with any threatened or actual claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, whether arising before or after the effective time of the first-step merger, arising out of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer or employee of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or any of its subsidiaries and pertaining to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time, of the first-step merger, including the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, to the samefullest extent which such persons are entitled to be indemnified as of the date of the merger agreement by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank pursuant to Ocean Shore’sits certificate of incorporation Ocean Shore’sor bylaws or the governing or organizational documents of any subsidiary of Ocean Shore, andCapital Bank applicable to such person.

OceanFirst has also agreed to advance expenses toas incurred by such personsindemnified party to the samefullest extent as such persons are entitled to advancement of expenses as of the date of the merger agreement by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank pursuant to Ocean Shore’sits certificate of incorporation Ocean Shore’sor bylaws or the governing or organizational documents of any subsidiary of Ocean Shore, exceptCapital Bank applicable to such person; provided that, if required, such personrequested by OceanFirst, the indemnified party to whom expenses are advanced provides an undertaking to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined in a final determination or by a court of competent jurisdiction that such personindemnified party is not entitled to indemnification.

The merger agreement requires the surviving corporationIn addition, OceanFirst has agreed to maintain for a period of six years after completion of the first-step merger, Ocean Shore’s existingcurrent directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy or policies with a substantially comparable insurer of at leastCapital Bank, subject to certain exceptions, for six years after the same coverage and amounts and containing terms and conditions that are no less advantageous to the insured,effective time with respect to claims against such directors, officers and employees arising from facts or events that occurred at or prior tobefore the completion of the integrated mergers. However, the surviving corporationeffective time; provided that, OceanFirst is not requiredobligated to spend annually more than the 200% of the annual premium currently paid by Ocean Shore under its current policy, and if such premiums for such insurance would at any time exceed that amount, then the surviving corporation will maintain policies of insurance which, in its good faith determination, provide the maximum coverage available atpay, on an annual premium equal to the premium cap. In lieu of the foregoing, Ocean Shore, in consultation with, but only upon the prior written consent of OceanFirst, may (and at the request of OceanFirst, Ocean Shore will use its reasonable best efforts to) obtain at or prior to the effective time of the first-step merger a six year “tail” policy under Ocean Shore’s existing directors and officers insurance policy providing equivalent coverage to that described in the preceding sentence if such a policy can be obtained forbasis, an amount that, in the aggregate, does not exceed 300%excess of 250% of the current annual premium paid as of the date of the merger agreement by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank for such insurance. For additional information see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement —Director— Director and Officer Indemnification and Insurance” beginning on page 104[●] of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

AppointmentShare Ownership

As of [●], 2018, the record date, the directors and executive officers of Capital Bank may be deemed to be the Boardbeneficial owners of Directors

The merger agreement provides that, at[●] shares, representing [●]% of the outstanding shares of Capital Bank common stock, including [●] shares subject to exercisable options to purchase shares of Capital Bank common stock. Effective as of the effective time, ofas Capital Bank stockholders, the first-step merger, OceanFirst will expand its board of directors from 10 members to 13 members and will appoint Mr. Brady and two other current directors of Ocean Shore to the OceanFirst board.

Advisory Board

At or promptly following the effective time of the first-step merger, OceanFirst will create an advisory board, the purpose of which shall be to advise OceanFirst with respect to the integration of Ocean Shore’s business, as well

as to maintain and develop customer and other stakeholder relationships in Ocean Shore’s market area. The advisory board will consist of Mr. Brady and each member of the Ocean Shore board of directors who has not been appointed to the OceanFirst board of directors. As consideration for service on the advisory board, each such member (other than Mr. Brady)executive officers will be entitled to receive compensation in the amountmerger consideration for their shares of $30,000 per yearCapital Bank common stock. As option holders, they will be entitled to receive cash (without interest) equal to the product of (a) the aggregate number of shares of Capital Bank common stock issuable upon exercise of the option and (b) the excess, if any, of (i) the product of the exchange ratio and the VWAP of OceanFirst’s common stock on the NASDAQ for a period of two years followingthe five full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the closing of the first-step merger.

Quantification of Payments and Benefits to Ocean Shore’s Named Executive Officers

The information set forth in the table below is intended to comply with Item 402(t) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K, which requires disclosure of information about certain compensation for each named executive officer of Ocean Shore that is based on, or otherwise relates to, the merger (which we refer to as “merger-related compensation”).

The merger-related compensation described below is based on the existing agreements with Ocean Shore. The table does not include amounts payable under the anticipated new agreements with OceanFirst following the effective time of the first-step merger. For additional details regarding the anticipated new agreements with OceanFirst, see the discussion under the heading “— Agreements with OceanFirst” above.

The table below sets forth the amount of payments and benefits that each of Ocean Shore’s named executive officers would receive in connection with the first-step merger, based on multiple assumptions that may or may not actually occur or be accurate on the relevant date including the assumptions described below and in the footnotes to the table, and reflects the vesting of certain equity awards held by the named executive officers as of August 1, 2016 that would vest in accordance with their terms prior to the effective time of the first-step merger. For purposes of calculating such amounts, in addition to the assumptions described in the footnotes to the table below, the following assumptions were used:

The amounts below are determined using a price per share of Ocean Shore common stock of $21.71, which is the average closing price per share over the first five business days following the first public announcement of the merger agreement;

Theover (ii) theper-share exercise price of such Capital Bank stock option, which will be payable as soon as practicable after the effective time of the first-step merger is assumed to occur on December 31, 2016 solely for purposes of the disclosure in this section, and each named executive officer is assumed to experience a qualifying termination on such date; andtime.

Except where otherwise indicated, the amounts below have not been reduced to reflect any reduction in benefits that may be applicable under the terms of the employment and change in control agreements to avoid any loss of deductibility under Section 280G of the Code and imposition of excise taxes on the named executive officer under Section 4999 of the Code.

Golden Parachute Compensation

Name

  Cash
($)(1)
   Equity
($)(2)
   Pension/
NQDC
($)(3)
   Perquisites/
Benefits
($)(4)
   Total
($)
 

Steven E. Brady

   2,236,067     101,980     910,187     0     3,248,234  

Janet M. Bossi

   618,510     80,141     291,630     6,702     966,983  

Kim M. Davidson

   691,637     74,214     195,037     3,449     964,337  

Donald F. Morgenweck

   627,270     64,167     0     0     691,437  

Anthony J. Rizzotte

   851,925     74,214     0     0     926,039  

(1)

Cash. The employment agreement between Ocean Shore and Mr. Brady provides the following cash severance payment if within two years after a change in control, Ocean Shore terminates Mr. Brady’s employment without cause or Mr. Brady voluntarily terminates employment “with good reason”: (a) a lump sum cash payment equal to 2.99 times the average of his annual compensation (including all taxable income plus any retirement contributions or benefits made or accrued on his behalf) over the five calendar years preceding the change in control; and (b) the benefits he would have received under Ocean Shore’s retirement programs for a period of 36 months. The change in control agreements with each of the other named executive officers provide for a cash severance payment in the event of termination of employment by Ocean Shore without cause or a resignation by the executive for “good reason” within one year following the change in control of Ocean Shore equal to three times the executive officer’s average taxable income over the five years preceding the

year in which the change in control occurs. The cash payments under Mr. Brady’s employment agreement and the change in control agreements with the other named executive officers would be “double-trigger.” The potential payments for consulting services payable by OceanFirst under the separation and consulting agreement with Mr. Brady are not included in the table, and these amounts will only become payable subject to his continued service after the effective time of the first-step merger or in connection with certain terminations thereof. The potential payments under the OceanFirst arrangements with Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson are also not included in the table.
(2)Equity. As described above, all unvested equity-based awards held by Ocean Shore’s named executive officers will become vested at the effective time of the first-step merger (i.e., “single-trigger” vesting) and will either (a) be settled for the merger consideration, in the case of Ocean Shore restricted stock awards, or (b) be assumed by OceanFirst, in the case of Ocean Shore stock options. Set forth below are the values of each type of equity-based award outstanding as of the date hereof that would become vested upon the effective time of the first-step merger, based on a price per share of Ocean Shore common stock of $21.71.

Name

  Stock Options
($)
   Restricted Stock
($)
 

Steven E. Brady

   15,140     86,840  

Janet M. Bossi

   15,011     65,130  

Kim M. Davidson

   9,084     65,130  

Donald F. Morgenweck

   7,721     56,466  

Anthony J. Rizzotte

   9,084     65,130  

(3)Pension/NQDC. The amount in the table reflects the aggregate dollar value of pension and nonqualified deferred compensation benefit enhancements. Set forth below are (a) the benefit enhancement under the salary continuation agreements, which is the difference between the present value of the early retirement benefit payable under the salary continuation agreement with the named executive officer and the present value of the change in control benefit that would be payable if the executive officer terminates employment following the completion of the merger, in each case using a discount rate of 6.0%, and (b) the supplemental stock ownership benefit under the supplemental executive retirement plan, calculated as 35,395 shares of Ocean Shore common stock valued at $21.71 per share. The enhanced benefit under the salary continuation agreements is “double-trigger” and the supplemental stock ownership benefit under the supplemental executive retirement plan is “single-trigger.”

Name

  Salary
Continuation
Agreements

($)
   Supplemental
Executive
Retirement
Plan

($)
 

Steven E. Brady

   141,762     768,425  

Janet M. Bossi

   291,630     0  

Kim M. Davidson

   195,037     0  

Donald F. Morgenweck

   0     0  

Anthony J. Rizzotte

   0     0  

(4)Perquisites/Benefits. The amount in the table reflects the benefit enhancement under the split dollar life insurance agreements for Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson, calculated as the present value of the value of the insurance coverage under the split dollar insurance agreements with Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson through the date on which each executive attains normal retirement age under their respective salary continuation agreements. Such benefit is “single-trigger.” As discussed in “— Employment Agreement between Steven E. Brady and Ocean Shore” above, Mr. Brady would be entitled to continuation of coverage under Ocean Shore’s health and welfare plans for 36 months following his termination of employment. Because Mr. Brady will receive continued coverage as a director of OceanFirst, the value of the continuing insurance coverage is not included in the table above. As discussed in “—Change in Control Agreements between Other Executive Officers and Ocean Shore” above, Ms. Bossi, Ms. Davidson, Mr. Morgenweck and Mr. Rizzotte are entitled to continuation of coverage under Ocean Shore’s health and welfare plans for 36 months following termination of employment within 12 months after a change in control. Ms. Bossi and Ms. Davidson will not be entitled to continuing insurance benefits under their change in control agreements because they will be employees of OceanFirst after the merger. Because Mr. Morgenweck’s and Mr. Rizzotte’s change in control agreements require a reduction in benefits to avoid adverse tax consequences under Section 280G and Section 4999 of the Code, Mr. Morgenweck and Mr. Rizzotte are assumed to elect to forego receipt of continued insurance benefits in order to receive a greater cash severance payment. The estimated value of the continued insurance coverage that both Mr. Rizzotte and Mr. Morgenweck are assumed to have elected to forego is $28,485.

Public Trading Markets

OceanFirst common stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OCFC” and Ocean Shore common stock is listed on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OSHC.“OCFC. Upon completion of the first-step merger, Ocean Shore common stock will no longer be listed on the NASDAQ and will be de-registered under the Exchange Act. It is a condition to each party’s obligations to complete the integrated mergersmerger that the OceanFirst common stock to be issued pursuant to the merger agreement be authorized for listing on the NASDAQ (subject to official notice of issuance). Immediately following the completion of the Transactions,merger, shares of OceanFirst common stock will continue to be traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OCFC.”

Capital Bank common stock is traded on the OTC Pink under the symbol “CANJ.” Upon completion of the merger, Capital Bank common stock will cease to be traded on the OTC Pink.

Dividend Policy

OceanFirst currently pays a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13$0.17 per share, which is expected to continue, although the OceanFirst board may change this dividend policy at any time. Ocean Shore currently pays quarterly cash dividends of $0.06 per share, which is expected to continue until the effective time, although, subject to certain restrictions in the merger agreement, the Ocean Shore board may change this dividend policy at any time. OceanFirst stockholders will be entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the OceanFirst board out of funds legally available for dividends. The OceanFirst board will consider OceanFirst’s financial condition and level of net income, future prospects, economic condition, industry practices and other factors, including applicable banking laws and regulations, in determining whether to pay dividends in the future and the amount of such dividends.

OceanFirst’s principal source of income is dividends that are declared and paid by OceanFirst Bank on its capital stock. Therefore, OceanFirst’s ability to pay dividends is dependent upon the receipt of dividends from OceanFirst Bank. Insured depository institutions such as OceanFirst Bank are prohibited from making capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become “undercapitalized,” as such term is defined in the applicable law and regulations. In the future, any declaration and payment of cash dividends will be subject to the OceanFirst board’s evaluation of OceanFirst’s operating results, financial condition, future growth plans, general business and economic conditions, and tax and other relevant considerations. The payment of cash dividends by OceanFirst in the future will also be subject to certain other legal and regulatory limitations and ongoing review by the OceanFirst’s banking regulators.

No Dissenters’ Rights

Dissenters’General

Capital Bank stockholders may dissent from the merger in accordance with 12 U.S.C. § 215a, which are the controlling provisions relating to the dissenters’ rights of Capital Bank stockholders in light ofSection 17:9A-148 of the New Jersey Revised Statutes, which provides that federal law, rather than the NJ Banking Act, will be controlling with respect to stockholders’ rights in the merger of a New Jersey bank with and into a national banking association, such as OceanFirst Bank. If the merger is completed, under 12 U.S.C. § 215a, holders of Capital Bank common stock are statutory rights that, if applicable under law, enable stockholdersentitled to dissent from an extraordinary transaction, such as athe merger and to demand that the corporation payobtain payment of the fair value of their shares as determined by a court in a judicial proceedingcash (together with accrued interest) instead of receiving the merger consideration offeredthey would otherwise be entitled to stockholdersreceive pursuant to the merger agreement as long as such holders comply with the statutorily prescribed procedures. The appraised value of the Capital Bank common stock may differ from the consideration that, as of the effective time, a stockholder of Capital Bank will be entitled to receive in the merger. The following summarizes the material rights of holders of Capital Bank common stock under 12 U.S.C. § 215a. You should read the applicable sections of 12 U.S.C. § 215a, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex B. The summary below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of 12 U.S.C. § 215a.

If you are contemplating the possibility of exercising your dissenters’ rights in connection with the extraordinary transaction. New Jersey law providesmerger, you should carefully review the full text of 12 U.S.C. § 215a and consult legal counsel before attempting to exercise dissenters’ rights. If you do not fully and precisely satisfy the procedural requirements of 12 U.S.C. § 215a, you will lose your dissenters’ rights. If any holder of shares of Capital Bank common stock who asserts dissenters’

rights withdraws or loses (through failure to perfect or otherwise) the right to obtain payment for such holder’s shares under 12 U.S.C. § 215a, then such stockholder’s shares will be converted, or will be treated as if they had been converted, into the right to receive the merger consideration, without interest and subject to any applicable withholding of taxes if the merger is completed. Capital Bank will not provide you with any notice regarding your dissenters’ rights other than as described in this proxy statement/prospectus and the notice of special meeting included with this proxy statement/prospectus.

Requirements for Exercising Dissenters’ Rights

Under 12 U.S.C. § 215a, a Capital Bank stockholder may dissent from the merger by (i) voting against the merger or giving notice in writing at or prior to the special meeting to the presiding officer of Capital Bank that he, she or it dissents from the merger (and, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, subsequently such stockholder must not vote for the merger), and (ii) making a written request to OceanFirst to receive the value of such stockholder’s shares of Capital Bank common stock, which request must be made within 30 days after the effective time and must be accompanied by the surrender of the stockholder’s stock certificates.

The appraised value of the shares held by any dissenting Capital Bank stockholder will be determined as of the effective time by an appraisal made by a committee of three persons composed of (i) one person selected by majority vote of the dissenting Capital Bank stockholders entitled to receive the value of their shares of Capital Bank common stock in cash, (ii) one person selected by the OceanFirst board and (iii) one person selected by the appraisers selected pursuant to subclauses (i) and (ii) (each, an “appraiser”). The valuation agreed upon by any two of the three appraisers will govern. However, if the appraised value is not entitledsatisfactory to demandany eligible dissenting Capital Bank stockholder, that Capital Bank stockholder may, within five days of being notified of the fairappraised value of his, her or herits shares, appeal to the OCC who will cause a reappraisal to be made, which will be final and binding as to the value of the shares of stock inthe dissenting stockholder who has appealed to the OCC.

If, within 90 days from the effective time, for any transaction ifreason one or more of the stockthree appraisers is listed on a national securities exchange, if cash isnot selected as provided by 12 U.S.C. § 215a, or the appraisers fail to determine the appraised value of the dissenting shares, the OCC may, upon written request of any interested party, cause an appraisal to be receivedmade, which will be final and binding on all parties. OceanFirst will promptly pay the amount equal to the appraised value of shares, as ascertained under 12 U.S.C. § 215a. The expenses of the OCC in making the appraisal or the securitiesreappraisal will be paid by OceanFirst.

The foregoing summary is not intended to be received are listed on a national securities exchange. Because Ocean Shore’s common stockcomplete statement of the procedures necessary for exercising dissenters’ rights under 12 U.S.C. § 215a and is listed onqualified in its entirety by reference to the NASDAQ,full text of such provisions, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex B. Capital Bank urges any stockholders wishing to exercise dissenters’ rights to read this summary and the holdersfull text of Ocean Shore common stock are not entitled12 U.S.C. § 215a carefully, and to consult legal counsel before attempting to exercise dissenters’ or appraisal rightsrights. Failure to comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 215a may result in the first-step merger.loss of your statutory dissenters’ rights.

Regulatory Approvals Required for the TransactionsMerger

Completion of the Transactionsmerger is subject to receipt of certain approvals, waivers and consentsregulatory approval of the merger or waiver of such approval from applicable governmental and regulatory authorities,the OCC, without certain conditions being imposed by any governmental authority as part of a regulatory approval that would reasonably be expected to result in a materially burdensome regulatory condition. Other approvals, waivers or consents from governmental and regulatory authorities may also be required. Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank have agreed to cooperate with each other and use their respective reasonable best efforts and cooperate to promptly prepare and file all necessary documentation and to obtain as promptly as practicable all regulatory approvals necessary or advisable to complete the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. These include, among others,agreement, which includes approval (or waiver of such approval) from the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC. OceanFirst and Ocean Shore submitted the FRB waiver request on August 26, 2016 andan application to the OCC application on August 18, 2016.November 9, 2018, for approval of the merger. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/

prospectus, OCC approval has not yet been granted. OCC approval (if granted) for the FRB waiver request has been granted,merger: (i) would reflect only its view that the transaction does not contravene applicable competitive standards imposed by law and is consistent with regulatory policies relating to safety and soundness; (ii) would not be an OCC opinion that the merger is financially favorable to the stockholders or that the OCC application remains outstanding.has considered the adequacy of the terms of the transaction; and (iii) would not be an endorsement of, or recommendation for, the merger. Although neither Ocean ShoreCapital Bank nor OceanFirst knows of any reason why the OCC application should not be approvedit cannot obtain this regulatory approval in a timely manner, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and OceanFirst cannot be certain when, or if, the OCC applicationit will be approved.obtained.

Federal Reserve Board

OceanFirst is a savings and loan holding company regulated and supervised by the Federal Reserve Board under the Home Owners Loan Act of 1933 (which we refer to as “HOLA”). Unless granted a waiver by the Federal Reserve Board, the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement require prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board under HOLA.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

OceanFirst Bank is an insured depository institution regulated and supervised by the OCC. The merger of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank with and into OceanFirst Bank requires prior approval of the OCC under the National Bank Act and Section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (which we refer to as the “Bank Merger Act.Act”). In evaluating an application for such approval, the OCC takes into consideration a number of factors, including (i) the competitive impact of the transaction; (ii) financial and managerial resources of the bank parties to the bank merger or integrated mergers both on a current and pro forma basis; (iii) the convenience and needs of the community to be served and the record of the banks under the CRA,Community Reinvestment Act (which we refer to as the “CRA”), including their CRA ratings; (iv) the banks’ effectiveness in combating money laundering activities; and (v) the extent to which the bank merger or integrated mergers would result in greater or more concentrated risks to the stability of the U.S. banking or financial system. In connection with its review, the OCC provides an opportunity for public comment on the application and is authorized to hold a public meeting or other proceeding if it determines that would be appropriate.

Additional Regulatory Approvals and Notices

OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank believe that the Transactions domerger does not raise substantial antitrust or other significant regulatory concerns and that the parties to the Transactionsmerger will be able to obtain all requisite regulatory approvals. However, neither OceanFirst nor Ocean ShoreCapital Bank can assure you that all of the regulatory approvals described above will be obtained and, if obtained, OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank cannot assure you as to the timing of any such approvals, their ability to obtain the approvals on satisfactory terms or the absence of any litigation challenging such approvals. In addition, there can be no assurance that such approvals will not impose conditions or requirements that, individually or in the aggregate, would or could reasonably be expected to have a materially burdensome regulatory condition.

Neither OceanFirst nor Ocean ShoreCapital Bank is aware of any material governmental approvals or actions that are required for completion of the Transactionsmerger other than those described above. It is presently contemplated that if any such additional governmental approvals or actions are required, those approvals or actions will be sought. There can be no assurance, however, that any additional approvals or actions will be obtained.

Litigation Related to the Transactions

On July 22, 2016, Robert Strougo, a purported Ocean Shore stockholder, filed a putative class action lawsuit in the Superior Court for the State of New Jersey, Cape May County, against Ocean Shore, the members of the Ocean Shore board and OceanFirst on behalf of all Ocean Shore public stockholders. The lawsuit generally alleges that the members of the Ocean Shore board breached their fiduciary duties by approving the merger agreement because the Transactions are procedurally flawed and financially inadequate, certain terms in the merger agreement are preclusive and unfair, and certain members of the Ocean Shore board are conflicted. Plaintiff further alleges that OceanFirst aided and abetted such breaches. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the merger, as well as unspecified money damages, costs and attorney’s fees and expenses. On September 7, 2016, plaintiff filed an amended complaint bringing disclosure claims alleging that OceanFirst’s registration statement on Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, omitted certain material information. Although the defendants believe that they have meritorious defenses to the plaintiff’s claims, defendants and plaintiffs agreed to the terms of a settlement on October 10, 2016 whereby additional disclosures were made in the Registration Statement. The terms of the settlement are subject to, among other things, further documentation and Court approval.

On September 8, 2016, Robert Garfield, a purported stockholder of OceanFirst, filed a putative class action in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Ocean County, captioned Garfield v. OceanFirst Financial Corp., et alNo. OCN-L-2469-16, against OceanFirst and members of the OceanFirst board on behalf of all public OceanFirst stockholders. The lawsuit generally alleges that the members of the OceanFirst board breached their fiduciary duties by approving the Transactions. The lawsuit further alleges the Transactions are not in the best interests of the OceanFirst stockholders and provide personal benefits to the individual defendants. The lawsuit also alleges that the Registration Statement omitted certain material information. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the

Transactions, as well as unspecified money damages, costs and attorney’s fees and expenses. In furtherance of this action, on October 12, 2016, Robert Garfield filed a motion asking the court (i) to enjoin the consummation of the Transactions pending completion of outstanding discovery requests, (ii) to direct OceanFirst to produce requested documents and be available for depositions and (iii) to set an evidentiary hearing to continue the injunction pending curative disclosures or, alternatively, trial. OceanFirst believes the allegations in the lawsuit are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend against all claims asserted. However, neither OceanFirst nor Ocean Shore can give you any assurance that OceanFirst may not face additional claims related to the Transactions.

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

The following description of the merger agreement is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the express terms of the merger agreement, which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex A and is incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We urge you to read the merger agreement carefully and in its entirety, as it is the legal document governing the integrated mergers.merger.

Structure of the TransactionsMerger

Each of the OceanFirst board and the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board has unanimously approved the merger agreement. The merger agreement provides for (i) the merger of Merger Sub with and into Ocean Shore, with Ocean Shore continuing as the surviving corporation in the first-step merger and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst, (ii) immediately following the completion of the first-step merger, Ocean Shore will mergeCapital Bank with and into OceanFirst with OceanFirst continuing as the surviving corporation in the second-step merger and (iii) immediately following the completion of the integrated mergers, Ocean Shore Bank, will merge with and into OceanFirst Bank, a wholly owned bank subsidiary of OceanFirst, with OceanFirst Bank continuing as the surviving bank in the bank merger.merger and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst.

Prior to the completion of the Transactions, Ocean Shore and OceanFirst may, by mutual agreement, change the method or structure of effecting the combination of Ocean Shore and OceanFirst, except that no such change may (i) alter or change the amount and kind of the merger consideration, (ii) adversely affect the tax treatment of Ocean Shore stockholders or OceanFirst stockholders, (iii) adversely affect the tax treatment of Ocean Shore or OceanFirst or (iv) materially impede or delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement in a timely manner.

Merger Consideration

Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, at the effective time, each share of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the first-step merger,effective time, except for specified shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock owned by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank, OceanFirst or OceanFirst,stockholders who have properly exercised dissenters’ rights, will be converted into the right to receive $4.35 in cash, without interest, and 0.96671.25 shares of OceanFirst common stock.

If the amount of outstanding shares of OceanFirst common stock or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock is increased, decreased, changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities as a result of a reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or other similar change in capitalization, or if there is any extraordinary dividend or distribution, an appropriate and proportionate adjustment will be made to the merger consideration.exchange ratio.

Fractional Shares

OceanFirst will not issue any fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock in the first-step merger. Instead, any Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholder who otherwise would have been entitled to receive a fraction of a share of OceanFirst common stock will instead be entitled to receive an amount in cash, rounded to the nearest cent, determined by multiplying the fraction of a share (rounded to the nearest thousandth when expressed in decimal form) of OceanFirst common stock to which the holder would otherwise be entitled by the average closing-sale priceVWAP per share of OceanFirst common stock on the NASDAQ (as reported byThe Wall Street Journal) for the five full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the day on whichclosing date of the first-step merger is completed.merger.

Governing Documents; Directors and Officers; Governance MattersOfficers

Upon the consummation of the integrated mergers,merger, the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of OceanFirst Bank in effect immediately prior to the effective time will be the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the surviving corporationbank after completion of the integrated mergers,merger, until thereafter amended in accordance with applicable law and the terms of such documents.

Upon consummation of the Transactions, OceanFirst has agreed to (i) increasemerger, the size of the OceanFirst boarddirectors and the board of directorsofficers of OceanFirst Bank to thirteen members and (ii) appoint Steven E. Brady and two other current members of the Ocean Shore board, to be selected by the Leadership Committee of OceanFirst in consultation with the OceanFirst board and the Ocean Shore board,office immediately prior to the OceanFirst board and the board of directors of OceanFirst Bank, with one such appointee being appointed to each of the three classes of boards of OceanFirst and OceanFirst Bank.

In addition, at the effective time will be the directors and officers of the first-step merger, OceanFirst has agreed to create an advisory board, the purpose of which will be to advise OceanFirst with respect to the integration of Ocean Shore’s business, as well as to maintain and develop customer and other stakeholder relationships in Ocean Shore’s market area. The advisory board is expected to consist of Steven E. Brady and the four current memberssurviving bank after completion of the Ocean Shore boardmerger, until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified.

Dissenters’ Rights

If the merger is completed, Capital Bank stockholders who aredo not selected for appointment to the OceanFirst board and the board of directors of OceanFirst Bank, as described above. The membersvote in favor of the advisory board will be appointed to the advisory board for a term ending on the second anniversary of the effective time of the first-step merger proposal and in exchange for performing their duties on the advisory board,follow certain procedural steps will be entitled to receivedissenters’ rights under 12 U.S.C. § 215a, provided they take the steps required to perfect their rights under 12 U.S.C. § 215a. For more information regarding dissenters’ rights, see “The Merger — Dissenters’ Rights” beginning on page [●]. In addition, a feecopy of thirty thousand dollars per year.12 U.S.C. § 215a is attached asAnnex B to this proxy statement/prospectus.

It is a condition to OceanFirst’s obligation to complete the merger that the holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Capital Bank common stock exercise dissenters’ rights.

Treatment of Ocean Shore Equity-BasedCapital Bank Restricted Stock and Stock Option Awards

Restricted Stock

At the effective time, each outstanding restricted stock award in respect of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock granted under an Ocean Shore equity plan will become fully vestedvest and the restrictions thereonon those restricted stock awards will lapse, and each holder of such restricted stock award will be entitled to receive the merger consideration.

Stock Options

Also atconsideration in respect of the effective time, all outstanding and unexercised options to purchase Ocean Shore common stock will fully vest and will convert into options to purchase a numbercancellation of shareseach share of OceanFirst common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) determined by multiplying (i) the number of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock subject to such Ocean ShoreCapital Bank restricted stock option immediately prior toaward no later than 10 business days after the effective time.

Stock Options

At the effective time, by (ii) 1.2084;each outstanding and the exercise price per share of the newunexercised option (whether vested or unvested) to purchase Capital Bank common stock will be cancelled and exchanged for a payment in cash (without interest) equal to the quotient obtained by dividingproduct of (a) the per shareaggregate number of shares of Capital Bank common stock issuable upon exercise of the option and (b) the excess, if any, of (i) the product of the exchange ratio and the VWAP of OceanFirst’s common stock on the NASDAQ for the five full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the closing date of the merger over (ii) theper-share exercise price forof such Capital Bank stock option. The cash payment is payable as soon as practicable after the shares of Ocean Shore common stock subject to such Ocean Shore option by (b) 1.2084 (rounded up to the nearest whole cent).effective time.

Closing and Effective Time

The integrated mergersmerger will be completed only if all conditions to the integrated mergersmerger set forth in the merger agreement (as discussed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus) are either satisfied or waived. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “—“ — Conditions to Complete the Integrated Mergers.Merger.

The first-step merger will become effective as of the date and time specified in the certificate of merger to be filed withissued by the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey. The second-step merger will become effective as set forth in the certificate of merger to be filed with the Delaware Secretary of State.OCC. The closing of the integrated mergersmerger will take place at 10:00 a.m., New York City time, on the last business day of the first month after December 2018 in which the conditions set forth in the merger agreement have been satisfied or waived, unless another date or time is agreed to in writing by OceanFirst and Ocean Shore.Capital Bank. OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank currently expect to complete the Transactions late in the fourth quarter of 2016 or earlymerger in the first quarter of 2017,2019, subject to the requisite approval of the OceanFirst stockholders, the requisite approval of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders, the receipt of regulatory approvals or waivers (and expiration of any applicable waiting period) and the fulfillmentsatisfaction or waiver of other customary closing conditions set forth in the merger agreement, but neither Ocean ShoreCapital Bank nor OceanFirst can guarantee when, or if, the Transactionsmerger will be completed.

Conversion of Shares; Exchange of Certificates

The conversion of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock into the right to receive the merger consideration will occur automatically at the effective time. Promptly following completion of the first-step merger, the exchange agent will exchange certificates representing shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock for the merger consideration to be received pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement.

Letter of Transmittal

As promptly as practicable after the effective time, and in no event later than five business days thereafter,after the effective time, the exchange agent will mail to each holder of record of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock immediately prior to the effective time a letter of transmittal and instructions on how to surrender shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock in exchange for the merger consideration that the holder is entitled to receive under the merger agreement.

If a certificate for Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock has been lost, stolen or destroyed, the exchange agent will issue the merger consideration upon receipt of (i) an affidavit of that fact by the claimant and (ii) if required by OceanFirst,the exchange agent, the posting of a bond in an amount as OceanFirstthe exchange agent may determine is reasonably necessary as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such certificate.require.

Following completion of the first-step merger, there will be no further transfers on the stock transfer books of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time.

Withholding

OceanFirst and the exchange agentOceanFirst Bank will be entitled to deduct and withhold, including by requesting that the exchange agent deduct and withhold, from the merger consideration, any cash in lieu of fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock, cash dividends or distributions payable or any other cash amount payable under the merger agreement to any person the amounts they are required to deduct and withhold under the Code or any provision of state, local or foreign tax law. If any such amounts are so withheld and paid over to the appropriate governmental authority, these amounts will be treated for all purposes of the merger agreement as having been paid to the stockholdersperson from whom they were withheld.

Dividends and Distributions

No dividends or other distributions declared with respect to OceanFirst common stock with a record date after the effective time will be paid to theany holder of any unsurrendered certificates of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock until the holder surrenders such certificate in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement. After the surrender of a certificate in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, the record holder of such certificate will be entitled to receive any such dividends or other distributions having a record date after the effective time, without any interest thereon, which previously becomebecame payable with respect to the stock consideration whichthat the shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock represented by such certificate have been converted into the right to receive under the merger agreement.

Representations and Warranties

The representations warranties and covenantswarranties described below, and elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and included in the merger agreement were made by OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank for the benefit of the other party, only for purposes of the merger agreement and as of specific dates. In addition, the representations warranties and covenantswarranties may be subject to limitations, qualifications or exceptions agreed upon by the parties to the merger agreement, including those included in confidential disclosures made for the purposes of, among other things, allocating contractual risk between OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank rather than establishing matters as facts, and may be subject to standards of materiality that differ from those standards relevant to investors. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties and

covenants may change after the date of the merger agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in public disclosures by OceanFirst or Ocean Shore.OceanFirst. Therefore, you should not rely on the representations and warranties covenants or any description thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of OceanFirst, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates without considering the foregoing. The representations and warranties and other provisions of the merger agreement should not be read alone, but instead should be read only in conjunction with the information provided elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[●]. OceanFirst and Ocean Shore will provide additional disclosure in their respectiveits public reports to the extent they becomeit becomes aware of the existence of any material facts that are required to be disclosed under federal securities laws and that might otherwise contradict the representations and warranties in the merger agreement and will update such disclosure as required by the federal securities laws.

The merger agreement contains customary representations and warranties of each of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore relating to their respective businesses. The representations and warranties in the merger agreement do not survive the effective time.

The merger agreement contains representations and warranties made by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank relating to a number of business and other matters, including the following:

 

corporate matters, including due organization and qualification and subsidiaries;

 

capitalization;

 

authority relative to execution and delivery of the merger agreement and the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, organizational documents or other obligations as a result of the integrated mergers;merger;

 

required governmental, regulatory and third party consents, approvals and filings in connection with the integrated mergers;merger;

 

reports to regulatory authorities;

 

financial statements, internal controls, books and records, and the absence of undisclosed liabilities;

 

broker’s fees payable in connection with the integrated mergers;merger;

 

the absence of certain changes or events;

 

legal proceedings;

 

tax matters;

 

employee and employee benefits matters;

compliance with applicable laws;

certain material contracts;

absence of agreements with regulatory authorities;

derivative instruments and transactions;

environmental matters;

investment securities and commodities;

allowance for loan losses;

real property;

intellectual property and technology and data processing systems;

related party transactions;

the inapplicability of takeover statutes;

the absence of action or circumstance that could reasonably be expected to prevent the integrated mergersmerger from qualifying as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;

 

employee and employee benefits matters;

SEC reports;

compliance with applicable laws;

certain material contracts;

absence of agreements with regulatory authorities;

derivative instruments and transactions;

environmental matters;

investment securities and commodities;

real property;

intellectual property;

related party transactions;

inapplicability of takeover statutes;

opinion from its financial advisor;

 

the accuracy of information supplied for inclusion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and other similar documents;

 

loan matters; and

 

insurance matters.

The merger agreement contains representations and warranties made by OceanFirst relating to a number of business and other matters, including the following:

 

corporate matters, including due organization and qualification and subsidiaries;

 

capitalization;

authority relative to execution and delivery of the merger agreement and the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, organizational documents or other obligations as a result of the integrated mergers;merger;

 

required governmental, regulatory and third party consents, approvals and filings in connection with the integrated mergers;merger;

 

reports to regulatory authorities;

 

financial statements, internal controls, books and records, and absence of undisclosed liabilities;

 

broker’s fees payable in connection with the integrated mergers;merger;

 

the absence of certain changes or events;

 

legal proceedings;

 

tax matters;

SEC reports;

 

compliance with applicable laws;

the absence of agreements with regulatory authorities;

the inapplicability of takeover statutes;

the absence of action or circumstance that could reasonably be expected to prevent the integrated mergersmerger from qualifying as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;

 

employee and employee benefits matters;

SEC reports;

compliance with applicable laws;

absence of agreements with regulatory authorities;

certain material contracts;

environmental matters;

insurance matters;

loan matters;

inapplicability of takeover statutes;

opinion from its financial advisor; and

the accuracy of information supplied for inclusion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and other similar documents.documents;

technology and data processing systems;

tax matters;

employee and employee benefits matters; and

derivative instruments and transactions.

Certain representations and warranties of OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank are qualified as to “materiality” or “material adverse effect.” For purposes of the merger agreement, a “material adverse effect,” when used in reference to either Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, OceanFirst or the combined company, means a material adverse effect on (i) the business, properties, assets, liabilities, results of operations or financial condition of such party and its subsidiaries taken as a whole (provided that in the case of clause (i), a material adverse effect will not be deemed to include the impact of (a) changes, after the date of the merger agreement, in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (which we refer to as “GAAP”) or applicable regulatory accounting requirements, (b) changes, after the date of the merger agreement, in laws, rules or regulations of general applicability to companies in the industries in which such party and its subsidiaries operate, or interpretations thereof by courts or governmental entities, (c) changes, after the date of the merger agreement, in global, national or regional political conditions (including the outbreak of war or acts of terrorism) or in economic or market conditions affecting the financial services industry generally and not specifically relating to such party or its subsidiaries, or (d) public disclosure of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or actions expressly required by the merger agreement or actions or omissions that are taken with the prior written consent of the other party in contemplation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or (e) reasonable, customary and documented third party expenses incurred by either party in negotiating, documenting, effecting and consummating the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; except, with respect to subclauses (a), (b) and (c), to the extent that the effects of such changes are materially disproportionately adverse toaffect the business, properties, assets, liabilities, results of operations or financial condition of such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as compared to other companies in the industry in which such party and its subsidiaries operate) or (ii) the ability of such party to timely consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The representations and warranties in the merger agreement do not survive the effective time.

Covenants and Agreements

Conduct of Businesses Prior to the Effective Time

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has agreed that, prior to the effective time (or earlier termination of the merger agreement), subject to specified exceptions, it will, and will cause each of its subsidiaries to, conduct its business in the ordinary course, in all material respects, use reasonable best efforts to maintain and preserve intact its business organization, employees, independent contractors and advantageous customer and other business relationships, and take no action that would reasonably be expected to prevent or adversely affect or delay its(i) the parties’ ability to obtain any necessary approvals of any governmental entity or regulatory agency required for the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or to perform its covenants and agreements under the merger agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated therebyby the merger agreement on a timely basis.basis or (ii) performance by Capital Bank or its subsidiaries of its and their covenants and agreements contemplated by the merger agreement.

Additionally, prior to the effective time (or earlier termination of the merger agreement), subject to specified exceptions, Ocean Shore mayCapital Bank has agreed not and may notto permit any of its subsidiaries to, without the prior written consent of OceanFirst, which consent cannot be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, undertake the following actions:

 

other than in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practice, incur any indebtedness for borrowed money (other than indebtedness for borrowed money of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or any of its other subsidiaries), assume, guarantee, endorse or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible for the obligations of any other individual, corporation or other entity;

 

adjust, split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock;

 

make, declare or pay any dividend, or make any other distribution on, or directly or indirectly redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire, any shares of its capital stock or any securities or obligations convertible (whether currently convertible or convertible only after the passage of time or the occurrence of certain events) into or exchangeable for any shares of its capital stock (except (i) regular quarterly cash dividends by Ocean Shore at a rate not in excess of $0.06 per share of Ocean Shore common stock, (ii) dividends paid by any of the subsidiaries of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries, or (iii)(ii) the acceptance of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock as payment for the exercise price of stock options or for withholding taxes incurred in connection with the exercise of stock options or the vesting of equity compensation awards, in each case, in accordance with past practice and the terms of the applicable Capital Bank benefit plan and applicable award agreements and (iii) and the declaration and payment by Capital Bank, in respect of the second half of the 2018 calendar year, of one regular semi-annual cash dividend in an amount not in excess of $0.22 per share of Capital Bank common stock, which dividend, if so declared and paid, will be paid to holders of record of Capital Bank common stock, in each case during the 2019 calendar year prior to the closing of the merger);

payment for the exercise price of stock options or for withholding taxes incurred in connection with the exercise of stock options or the vesting or settlement of equity compensation awards, in each case, in accordance with past practice and the terms of the applicable award agreements);

 

grant any stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, shares of restricted sharesstock or other equity or equity-based awards or interests or grant any individual, corporation or other entity any right to acquire any shares of its capital stock;

 

issue, sell or otherwise permit to become outstanding (including by issuing any shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock that are held as “treasury shares” as of the date of the merger agreement) any additional shares of capital stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into, or exercisable for, any shares of its capital stock or any options, warrants or other rights of any kind to acquire any shares of capital stock, except pursuant to the exercise of stock options or the settlement of equity compensation awards outstanding as of the date of the merger agreement in accordance with their terms;

 

sell, transfer, mortgage, encumber or otherwise dispose of any of its material properties or assets or any business to any individual, corporation or other entity other than a wholly owned subsidiary of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, or cancel, release or assign any indebtedness to any such person or any claims held by any such person, in each case other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;business;

except for transactions in the ordinary course of business, make any material investment either by purchase of stock or securities, contributions to capital, property transfers or purchase of any property or assets of any other individual, corporation or other entity other than a wholly owned subsidiary of Ocean Shore;Capital Bank;

 

purchase any bank owned life insurance;

terminate, materially amend or waive any material provision of certain material contracts or make any change in any instrument or agreement governing the terms of any of its securities or any material lease or contract, other than normal renewals of contracts and leases in the ordinary course of business and without material adverse changes of terms with respect to Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, or enter into certain material contracts;contracts, subject to certain exceptions;

 

subject to certain exceptions, including as required under applicable law or the terms of any Ocean ShoreCapital Bank benefit plansplan existing as of the date of the merger agreement, (i) enter into, adopt or terminate any employee benefit or compensation plan, program, practice, policy, contract or arrangement for the benefit or welfare of any current or former employee, officer, director, independent contractor or consultant (or spouse or dependent of such individual), (ii) amend (whether in writing or through the interpretation of) any Ocean ShoreCapital Bank benefit plan, (iii) increase the compensation or benefits payable to any current or former employee, officer, director, independent contractor or consultant (or any spouse or dependent of such individual), except for annual base salary or wage increases for employees (other than directors or executive officers) in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practice, that do not exceed, (x) with respect to any individual, two(A) ten percent (2%(10%) of such individual’s base salary or wage rate in effect as of the date of the merger agreement for any employee whose 2018 salary or wages will be less than $50,000 or (B) five percent (5%) of such individual’s base salary or wage rate in effect as of the date of the merger agreement for all other employees and (y) three andone-half percent (3.5%) in the aggregate for all employees, (iv) pay or award, or commit to pay or award, any bonuses or incentive compensation except for bonuses to be awarded with respect to Capital Bank’s 2018 fiscal year, (v) grant or accelerate the vesting of any equity or equity-based awards or other compensation except for vesting that is required by the terms of the award, (vi) negotiate or enter into any new, or amend any existing, employment, severance, change in control, retention, bonus guarantee, collective bargaining agreement or similar agreement or arrangement, (vii) fund any rabbi trust or similar arrangement, (viii) terminate the employment or services of any officer or any employee whose target total annual base salary (or annual base compensation for independent contractor or consultant) is equal to or greater than $100,000,$75,000, other than for cause (as determined in the ordinary course of business), (ix) hire or promote any officer or any employee, independent contractor or consultant, who has target totalwhose annual base salary (or annual base compensation, in the case of any independent contractor or consultant) is equal to or greater than $100,000$75,000 or (x) waive, release or limit any restrictive covenant obligation of any current or former officer, employee, independent or contractor or consultant of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or any of its subsidiaries;

 

settle any material claim, suit, action or proceeding, except in the ordinary course of business in an amount not in excess of $50,000$75,000 individually or in the aggregate and that would not impose any material restriction on the business of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or its subsidiaries, OceanFirst or the combined company;surviving bank;

take any action, or knowingly fail to take any action, where such action or failure to act could reasonably be expected to prevent the integrated mergers, taken together,merger from being treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesqualifying as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;

 

amend Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s certificate of incorporation Ocean Shoreand bylaws or comparable governing document of any of its subsidiaries;

 

merge or consolidate itself or any of its subsidiaries with any other person, or restructure, reorganize or completely or partially liquidate or dissolve ititself or any of its subsidiaries;

materially restructure or materially change its investment securities or derivatives portfolio or its interest rate exposure, through purchases, sales or otherwise, or the manner in which the portfolio is classified or reported or purchase any security rated below investment grade;

 

take any action that is intended or expected to result in any of its representations and warranties being or becoming untrue in any material respect, or in any of the conditions to the integrated mergersmerger not being satisfied, or in a violation of any provision of the merger agreement, except as may be required by applicable law;agreement;

 

implement or adopt any change in its accounting principles, practices or methods, other than as may be required by GAAP;

 

enter into any new line of business or change in any material respect its lending, investment, underwriting, originating, acquiring, selling, deposit pricing, risk and asset liability management and other banking and operating securitization and servicing policies or practices (including any change in the maximum ratio or similar limits as a percentage of its capital exposure applicable with respect to its loan portfolio or any segment thereof), except as required by applicable law, regulation or policies imposed by any governmental entity;regulatory agency;

 

make any loans or extensions of credit or grant additional credit to a current borrower, except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

makebusiness; provided that any individual unsecured loan or extension of credit or grant of additional credit in excess of $100,000 that is not as of the date of the merger agreement approved and committed in excess of $500,000 or any individual secured loan or extension of credit in excessor grant of $2,000,000, with respect to residential mortgage loans, and $1,000,000 with respect to all other secured loans or extensions of credit, except that OceanFirst will have been deemed to have consented to any loan or extension ofadditional credit in excess of such amounts$2,500,000 that is not as of the date of the merger agreement approved will require prior written approval of the Chief Credit Officer of OceanFirst or otherwise not permittedanother officer designated in writing by this restriction if OceanFirst, does not object to any such proposed loanwhich approval or extension of creditrejection will be given in writing within three business days of receipt by OceanFirst of a request by Ocean Shore to exceedafter the loan package is delivered, or else such limit along with all financial or other data that OceanFirst may reasonably request in order to evaluate such loan or extension of credit;approval will be deemed given;

 

change in any material respect its hedging practices and policies, except as required by law or requested by a regulatory agency;

 

make, or commit to make, any capital expenditures except for capital expenditures in excessthe ordinary course of business consistent with past practice in amounts not exceeding $25,000 individually or $100,000 in the aggregate;

 

make, change or revoke any tax election, adopt or change any tax accounting method, file any amended tax return, settle or compromise any tax liability, claim or assessment or agree to an extension or waiver of the limitation period to any material tax claim or assessment, grant any power of attorney with respect to material taxes, surrender any right to a claim of refund of material taxes, enter into any closing agreement with respect to any material tax or refund or amend any material tax return;

 

make application for the opening, relocation or closing of any, or open, relocate or close any, branch office, loan production office or other significant office or operations facility of it or its subsidiaries;

 

materially reduce the amount of insurance coverage or fail to renew any material existing insurance policy, in each case, with respect to the key employees, properties or assets of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or any of its subsidiaries; or

agree to take, make any commitment to take or adopt any resolutions of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board or similar governing body in support of any of the foregoing.

OceanFirst has agreed that, prior to the effective time (or earlier termination of the merger agreement), subject to specified exceptions, OceanFirst may not, and may not permit any of its subsidiaries to, without the prior written consent of Ocean Shore, which, consent cannot be unreasonably withheld, continued or delayed, undertake the following actions:Capital Bank:

 

amend OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws in a manner that would adversely affect the economic benefits of the integrated mergersmerger to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders;

 

adjust, split, combine or reclassify any of OceanFirst’s capital stock;

make, declare or pay any dividend, or make any other distribution on, any shares of OceanFirst’s capital stock or any securities or obligations convertible (whether currently convertible or convertible only after the passage of time or the occurrence of certain events) into or exchangeable for any shares of its capital stock (except regular quarterly cash dividends, including any increase in such quarterly cash dividends or dividends paid by any of the subsidiaries of OceanFirst to OceanFirst or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries);

take any action that is intended to result in any of OceanFirst’s representations and warranties being or becoming untrue in any material respect, or in any of the conditions to the integrated mergersmerger not being satisfied or in a violation of any provision of the merger agreement, except as may be required by applicable law;agreement;

 

take any action or knowingly fail to take any action where such action or failure to act would reasonably be expected to prevent the integrated mergers, taken together,merger from being treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesqualifying as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;

 

take any action that is intended to, would or would be reasonably be expectedlikely to adversely affectprevent or materially delay in any material respect the ability to obtain any necessary approvalsconsummation of any regulatory agency or other governmental entity required for the Transactions or to perform OceanFirst’s covenants and agreements undertransactions contemplated by the merger agreement, or to consummate the Transactions on a timely basis; orexcept, in every case, as may be required by applicable law;

 

make, declare or pay any extraordinary dividend on the capital stock of OceanFirst; or

agree to take, make any commitment to take, or adopt any resolutions of OceanFirst’s board of directors or similar governing body in support of, any of the foregoing.

Regulatory Matters

OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank have agreed to cooperate with each other and use their respective reasonable best efforts to promptly prepare and file all necessary documentation, to effect all applications, notices, petitions and filings, to obtain all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all third parties and governmental entities whichthat are necessary or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. However, in no event will OceanFirst, OceanFirst Bank or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank be required to take any action, or commit to take any action, or agree to any condition or restriction, in connection with obtaining the required permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of governmental entities that would reasonably be expected to result in a materially burdensome regulatory condition. OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank have also agreed to furnish each other with all information reasonably necessary or advisable in connection with any statement, filing, notice or application to any governmental entity in connection with the Transactions,merger, as well as to keep each other apprised of the status of matters related to the completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

Employee Benefit Matters

OceanFirst has agreed that, for the period commencing onat the effective time and ending on the first anniversary of the effective time, OceanFirst will or will cause the surviving corporationbank to provide the employees of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and its subsidiaries who continue to be employed by OceanFirst or its subsidiaries (including the surviving bank) immediately followingafter the

effective time (which refer to as “continuing employees”), while employed by OceanFirst or its subsidiaries after the effective time, with base salaries, wages and employee benefits (excluding equity and equity based compensation) that are substantially comparable in the aggregate to the base salaries, wages and employee benefits (excluding equity and equity-based compensation) provided to similarly situated employees of OceanFirst and its subsidiaries, except that OceanFirst may satisfy this obligation by providing such continuing employees with base salaries, wages and employee benefits that are substantially comparable in the aggregate to the base salaries, wages and employee benefits (excluding equity and equity-based compensation) provided by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or its subsidiaries to such continuing employees immediately prior to the effective time.

UnderWith respect to employee benefit plans of OceanFirst or its subsidiaries in which continuing employees become eligible to participate on or after the effective time (which we refer to as “new benefit plans”), the merger agreement requires OceanFirst has agreed to, effective as of the effective time, assume and honor all Ocean Shore benefit plans in accordance with their terms. OceanFirst has further acknowledged that a “change in control” within the meaning of the Ocean Shore benefit plans will occur at the effective time of the first-step merger.

The merger agreement requiresor cause the surviving corporationbank to, use commercially reasonable best efforts to, with respect to the continuing employees:

 

waive all exclusions and waiting periods with respect to participation and coverage requirements applicable to such employees and their eligible dependents under any new benefit plans, ofunless such preexisting conditions, exclusions or waiting periods would apply under the surviving corporation;analogous Capital Bank benefit plan;

provide

credit each suchcontinuing employee and their eligible dependents with credit for anyco-payments and deductibles paid prior to the effective time under a Capital Bank benefit plan sponsored by Ocean Shore to(to the same extent that such credit was given under the analogous Ocean ShoreCapital Bank benefit plan prior to the effective time of the first-step mergertime) in satisfying any applicable deductible orout-of-pocket requirements under any new benefit plans of the surviving corporation;bank; and

 

recognize all service of suchcontinuing employees with Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and its subsidiaries, for all purposes in any new benefit plan of the surviving corporationbank to the same extent that such service was taken into account under the analogous Ocean ShoreCapital Bank benefit plan prior to the effective time, subject to certain limitations.

Effective prior to the closing, Ocean Shore will terminate the Ocean Shore ESOP and (unless OceanFirst requests otherwise in writing) the Ocean Shore 401(k) Plan, in each case, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement. As soon as practicable following the effective time, OceanFirst will permit or cause its subsidiaries to permitmerge Capital Bank’s 401(k) plan with and into the continuing401(k) plan maintained by OceanFirst.

Under the merger agreement, OceanFirst has also agreed to:

at the effective time, assume and honor through December 31, 2019 under Capital Bank’s vacation policies the accrued but unused vacation time of employees to roll over their account balances and outstanding loan balances, if any, under the Ocean Shore 401(k) Plan into an “eligible retirement plan” within the meaning of Section 402(c)(8)(B) of the Code maintainedsurviving bank who were employees of Capital Bank prior to the effective time; and

in conjunction with Capital Bank, mutually agree to a retention pool (subject to a maximum limitation) to certain employees of Capital Bank subject to the individuals remaining employed upon their designated “work through” date as set forth in a written retention bonus pool agreement.

Any employee of Capital Bank (other than employees with employment agreements that provide for severance payments) whose employment is terminated (other than for cause, as defined in OceanFirst’s severance policy) at the written request of OceanFirst (but by and in the sole discretion of Capital Bank) prior to the effective time, or is terminated by OceanFirst or its subsidiaries. The accounts of all participants and beneficiaries in the Ocean Shore ESOP as ofsubsidiary within one year following the effective time shall become fully vested asin a manner entitling such individual to benefits under OceanFirst’s severance policy, will be entitled to receive severance payments in accordance with the terms of the effective time. Any cash or unallocated shares of OceanFirst common stock held in the Ocean Shore ESOP’s suspense account after repayment of the Ocean Shore ESOP loan will be allocated as earnings to the accounts of the Ocean Shore ESOP participants who are employed as of the effective time based on their account balances under the Ocean Shore ESOP as of the effective time. Promptly following the receipt of a favorable determination letter from the IRS regarding the qualified status of the Ocean Shore ESOP upon the termination of the Ocean Shore ESOP, the account balances in the Ocean Shore ESOP will either be distributed to participants and beneficiaries or transferred to an eligible tax-qualified retirement plan or individual retirement account as a participant or beneficiary may direct. OceanFirst has agreed to permit the Ocean Shore ESOP participants who become employees of OceanFirst or OceanFirst subsidiaries to roll over their account balances in the Ocean Shore ESOP to the OceanFirst ESOP.merger agreement.

Director and Officer Indemnification and Insurance

Under the terms of the merger agreement, OceanFirst has agreed to, following the effective time, indemnify and hold harmless all present and former directors, officers and employees of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and its subsidiaries against all costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, losses, damages or liabilities incurred in connection with any threatened or actual claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation,

whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, whether arising before or after the effective time, arising out of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer or employee of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or its subsidiaries and pertaining to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time, including the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, to the samefullest extent such persons are entitled to be indemnified as of the date of the merger agreement by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank pursuant to Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s certificate of incorporation, Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s bylaws or the governing or organizational documents of any subsidiary of Ocean Shore, andCapital Bank as applicable to such person. OceanFirst has also agreed to advance expenses to such persons to the samefullest extent as such persons are entitled to advancement of expenses as of the date of the merger agreement by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank pursuant to Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s certificate, Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s bylaws or the governing or organizational documents of any subsidiary of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, except that, if required,requested by OceanFirst, such person provides an undertaking to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined in a final determination or by a court of competent jurisdiction that such person is not entitled to indemnification.

The merger agreement requires the surviving corporationOceanFirst to maintain, for a period of six years after completion of the first-step merger, Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s existing directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy, or policies with a substantially comparable insurer of at least the same coverage and amounts and containing terms and conditions that are no less advantageous to the insured, with respect to claims arising from facts or events that occurred at or prior to

the completion of the integrated mergers.merger. However, the surviving corporationOceanFirst is not required to spend annually more than 200%250% of the current annual premium paid as of the date of the merger agreement by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank for such insurance (which we refer to as the “premium cap”), and if such premiums for such insurance would at any time exceed that amount, then the surviving corporationbank will maintain policies of insurance which, in its good faith determination, provide the maximum coverage available at an annual premium equal to the premium cap. In lieu of the foregoing, Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, in consultation with, but only upon the prior written consent of OceanFirst, may (and at the request of OceanFirst, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will use its reasonable best efforts to) obtain at or prior to the effective time a six year prepaid “tail” policy under Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s existing directors and officers insurance policy providing equivalent coverage to that described in the preceding sentence if such a policy can be obtained for an amount that, in the aggregate, does not exceed 300% of the current annual premium paid as of the date of the merger agreement by Ocean Shore for such insurance.cap.

Restructuring Efforts

In the absence of additional circumstances specified in the merger agreement (as described in the last bullet point in “ — Termination of the Merger Agreement”), neither OceanFirst nor Ocean ShoreCapital Bank is permitted to terminate the merger agreement based on the failure of either such partyCapital Bank to obtain the required vote of its stockholders. Instead, each of the parties will in good faith use its reasonable best efforts to negotiate a restructuring of the transactionmerger (except that neither party will have any obligation to alter or change any material terms, including the amount or kind of the consideration to be issued to holders of the capitalcommon stock of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank as provided for in the merger agreement, in a manner adverse to such party or its stockholders) and/or resubmit the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby (or as restructured) to its respectiveCapital Bank’s stockholders for approval.

Certain Additional Covenants

The merger agreement also contains additional covenants, including, among others, covenants relating to the filing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, obtaining required consents, the listing of the shares of OceanFirst common stock to be issued in the first-step merger, access to information of the other company,party, the permissibility of representatives of OceanFirst and OceanFirst Bank’s attendance of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board meetings and certain committee meetings following the receipt of the requisite regulatory approvals, exemption from takeover laws, and public announcements with respect to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.agreement and communication and cooperation between Capital Bank and OceanFirst to plan and prepare for the consolidation of the companies at the effective time.

Capital Bank Stockholder MeetingsMeeting and Recommendation of the BoardsBoard of Directors of Ocean Shore and OceanFirstCapital Bank

Each of Ocean Shore and OceanFirstCapital Bank has agreed to hold a meeting of its stockholders for the purpose of voting upon approval of the merger agreement, in the case of Ocean Shore stockholders, and upon the OceanFirst share issuance, in the case of OceanFirst stockholders, in each case, as soon as reasonably practicable after the registration statement, of which this joint

proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, is declared effective. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain from its stockholders the vote required to approve the merger agreement, including by communicating to its stockholders its recommendation (and including such recommendation in this joint proxy statement/prospectus) that they approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and OceanFirstthereby. Capital Bank has made similar covenantsfurther agreed to, except as provided below, not withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify its recommendation or take any action, or make any public statement, filing or release inconsistent with respectits recommendation, or submit the merger agreement to its stockholders for a vote without its recommendation.

If the OceanFirst share issuance. However, if the OceanFirstCapital Bank board, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors,advisor, determines in good faith that it would be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to continue to recommend the merger agreement, then it may (but will not be required to) modify, withdraw or change its recommendation or submit the merger agreement to its stockholders without recommendation (which we refer to as a “Capital Bank adverse recommendation change”)(although the resolutions approving the merger agreement as of the date of the merger agreement may not be rescinded or amended) and may communicate the basis for its modification, change or lack of a recommendation to its stockholders to the extent required by law. If the Ocean Shore board, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors, determines in good faith that it would be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to continue to recommend the merger agreement, then it may (but will not be required to) submit the merger agreement to its stockholders without recommendation and may communicate the basis for its lack of a recommendation to its stockholders to the extent

required by law; except that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board may not take any such actions unless (i) if such action is taken in response to an acquisition proposal and such acquisition proposal did not result from a breach by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank of its obligations relating to thenon-solicitation of acquisition proposals and such acquisition proposal constitutes a superior proposal;“superior proposal” (as defined below); (ii) Ocean ShoreCapital Bank gives OceanFirst at least threetwo business days’ prior written notice of its intention to take such action and a reasonable description of the event or circumstances giving rise to its determination to take such action (including if such action is taken in response to an acquisition proposal, its basis for determining that such acquisition proposal constitutes a superior proposal (including the latest material terms and conditions of, and the identity of the third-partythird party making, any such acquisition proposal, or any amendment or modification thereof, or describe in reasonable detail such other event or circumstances)); (iii) during such two business day period, Capital Bank has considered and (iii)negotiated (and has caused its representatives to consider and negotiate) with OceanFirst in good faith (to the extent OceanFirst desires to so negotiate) regarding any adjustments or modifications to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement proposed by OceanFirst; and (iv) at the end of such notice period, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board takes into account any amendment or modification to the merger agreement proposed by OceanFirst (it being understood that OceanFirst(OceanFirst will not have any obligation to propose any adjustments, modifications or amendments to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement), and after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors,advisor, again determines in good faith that it would nevertheless be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to continue to recommend the merger agreement (and, if such action is taken in response to an acquisition proposal,and that such acquisition proposal constitutes a superior proposal).proposal. Any material amendment to any acquisition proposal will require a new determination and notice period.

Under the terms of the merger agreement, each of OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has agreed to adjourn or postpone the OceanFirst special meeting or the Ocean Shore special meeting, as the case may be, if, as of the time for which such meeting is originally scheduled, there are insufficient shares of OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock or Ocean Shore common stock, as the case may be, represented (either in person or by proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the business of such meeting, or if on the date of such meeting, Ocean Shore or OceanFirst, as applicable,Capital Bank has not received proxies representing a sufficient number of shares necessary to obtain the requisite Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholder approval orfor the requisite OceanFirst stockholder approval.merger. However, if (i) OceanFirst submitsan acquisition proposal has been received by Capital Bank and has been publicly disclosed, then Capital Bank will not be required to adjourn or postpone the OceanFirst share issuance proposalspecial meeting pursuant to the OceanFirst stockholders without recommendation or (ii) Ocean Shore submitscovenant described above more than two times following the merger agreement to the Ocean Shore stockholders without recommendation, then, in each case, an adjournment or postponementreceipt and public disclosure of the meeting due to an insufficient quorum or the failure to obtain the requisite Ocean Shore stockholder approval or the requisite OceanFirst stockholder approval, as applicable, is not required by the terms of the merger agreement.such acquisition proposal.

Under the merger agreement, unlessUnless the merger agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, OceanFirstCapital Bank has an unqualified obligation to convene the OceanFirst special meeting and to submit the OceanFirst share issuance proposal to the OceanFirst stockholders for the purpose of approving the OceanFirst share issuance proposal, and Ocean Shore has an unqualified obligation to convene the Ocean Shore special meeting and to submit the merger agreement to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders for the purpose of approving the Ocean Shore merger proposal.

Agreement Not to Solicit Other Offers

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has agreed that it will not, and will cause its subsidiaries and its and their officers, directors, agents, advisors and representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit, knowinglyinduce, encourage or knowingly facilitate any inquiries or proposals with respect to an acquisition proposal, (ii) engage or participate in any negotiations with any person concerning oran acquisition proposal, (iii) provide any confidential or nonpublic information or data to any person (other than OceanFirst, OceanFirst Bank or their representatives) concerning an acquisition proposal or (iv) have or participate in any discussions with, any person (other than OceanFirst, OceanFirst Bank or their representatives) relating to, any acquisition proposal except (x) the initial discussion in which Capital Bank receives an acquisition proposal, so long as such discussion does not violate clauses (i), (ii) or (iii), or (y) to notify such person of the existence of thesenon-solicit provisions of the merger agreement. However, if Ocean ShoreCapital Bank receives an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal prior to the date of the Ocean Shore special meeting and such proposal did not result from a breach of Ocean Shore’s Capital Bank’snon-solicitation obligations under the merger agreement, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank may, and may permit its subsidiaries and its and its subsidiaries’ officers, directors, agents, advisors and representatives to, furnish or cause to be furnished nonpublic information or data and participate in negotiations or discussions to the extent that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board concludes in good faith (after receiving the advice of its outside counsel, and with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors)advisor) that (1) such acquisition proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal and (2) failure to take such actions would be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law, except that, prior to providing any such

nonpublic information or data Ocean Shoreor participating in discussions, Capital Bank provides such information or data to OceanFirst and enters into a confidentiality agreement with such third-partythird party on terms no less favorablestringent to itsuch third party than the confidentiality agreement between OceanFirst and Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, and which confidentiality agreement does not provide such person with any exclusive right to negotiate with Ocean Shore.Capital Bank. Additionally, Capital Bank may not submit an acquisition proposal to the vote of its stockholders unless the merger agreement has been terminated.

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has also agreed to, and to cause its officers, directors, agents, advisors and representatives to, immediately cease and terminate any activities, discussions or negotiations conducted before the date of the merger agreement with any person other(other than OceanFirst, OceanFirst Bank or their representative) with respect to any acquisition proposal. In addition, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts, subject to applicable law, to (a) enforce any confidentiality, standstill or similar agreement relating to an acquisition proposal and (b) within ten10 business days after the date of the merger agreement, request and confirm the return or destruction of any confidential information provided to any person other than OceanFirst. Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has also agreed to promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) advise OceanFirst following receipt of any acquisition proposal or any inquiry whichthat could reasonably be expected to lead to an acquisition proposal, notify OceanFirst of such acquisition proposal or inquiry and the substance thereof (including the terms and conditions of and the identity of the person making such inquiry or acquisition proposal and copies of any written acquisition proposal)proposal or related summaries or communications), and to keep OceanFirst apprised of any related developments, discussions and negotiations on a current basis, including any amendments to or revisions of the terms of such inquiry or acquisition proposal.

For purposes of the merger agreement, an “acquisition proposal” means, other than the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, any offer, proposal or inquiry relating to, or any third-party indication of interest in, (i) any acquisition or purchase, direct or indirect, of 25% or more of the consolidated assets of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank and its subsidiaries or 25% or more of any class of equity or voting securities of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or its subsidiaries whose assets, individually or in the aggregate, constitute more than 25% of the consolidated assets of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, (ii) any tender offer (including a self-tender offer) or exchange offer that, if consummated, would result in such third-partyany person (other than OceanFirst or OceanFirst Bank) beneficially owning 25% or more of any class of equity or voting securities of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or its subsidiaries whose assets, individually or in the aggregate, constitute more than 25% of the consolidated assets of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, or (iii) a merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or other similar transaction involving Ocean ShoreCapital Bank or its subsidiaries whose assets, individually or in the aggregate, constitute more than 25% of the consolidated assets of Ocean Shore.Capital Bank. For purposes of the merger agreement, a “superior proposal” means any unsolicited bona fide written offer or proposal made by a third party to consummate an acquisition proposal that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board determines in good faith (after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors)advisor): (1) would, if consummated, result in the acquisition of all, but not less than all, of the issued and outstanding shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock or all, or substantially all, of the assets of Ocean Shore;Capital Bank; (2) would result in a transaction that (A) involves consideration to the holders of the shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common

stock that is (after accounting for any payment of the termination fee that may be required by the merger agreement) more favorable, from a financial point of view, than the consideration to be paid to the stockholders of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank pursuant to the merger agreement, considering, among other things, the nature of the consideration being offered and any material regulatory approvals or other risks associated with the timing of the proposed transaction beyond, or in addition to, those specifically contemplated hereby, and which proposal is not conditioned upon obtaining financing and (B) is, in light of the other terms of such proposal, more favorable to the stockholders of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank than the integrated mergersmerger and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; and (3) is reasonably likely to be completed on the terms proposed, in each case, taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of the acquisition proposal.

Conditions to Complete the Integrated MergersMerger

OceanFirst’s and Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s respective obligations to complete the integrated mergersmerger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following customary closing conditions:

 

the approval of the merger agreement by the Ocean Shore stockholders and the approvalrequisite vote of the OceanFirst share issuance by the OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders;

 

the authorization for listing on the NASDAQ, subject to official notice of issuance, of the OceanFirst common stock to be issued pursuant to the merger agreement;

 

the receipt of requisite regulatory approvals or waivers including from the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, and the expiration of all statutory waiting periods in respect thereof, without the imposition of a materially burdensome regulatory condition;thereof;

 

the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part, with respect to the OceanFirst common stock to be issued upon the consummation of the first-step merger, and the absence of any stop order (or proceedings for that purpose initiated and continued or threatened and not withdrawn)threatened);

 

the absence of any order, injunction, or decree or other legal restraint or prohibition by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the completion of the integrated mergersmerger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and the absence of any statute, rule, regulation, order, injunction or decree enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced by any governmental entity whichthat prohibits or makes illegal consummation of the integrated mergers;merger, and the absence of an order or injunction being sought by any governmental entity that would, if entered or enforced, prohibit the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;

 

the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party contained in the merger agreement as of the date on which the merger agreement was entered into and (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such earlier date) as of the date on which the first-step merger is completed, subject to the materiality standards provided in the merger agreement (and the receipt by each party of an officers’ certificate from the other party to such effect);

 

the performance in all material respects by the other party of all obligations required to be performed by it under the merger agreement at or prior to the date on which the integrated mergers aremerger is completed (and the receipt by each party of an officers’ certificate from the other party to such effect); and

 

receipt by such party of an opinion of legal counsel to the effect that on the basis of facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the integrated mergersmerger will together be treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesqualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code; andCode.

In addition, OceanFirst’s obligation to complete the merger is also subject to the following conditions:

 

receipt by OceanFirst of a duly executed certificate stating that Ocean ShoreCapital Bank is not, and has not been during the relevanta specified period, a “United States real property holding corporation.”corporation”;

the absence of a materially burdensome regulatory condition; and

the holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Capital Bank exercise their dissenters’ rights to appraisal pursuant to §12 U.S.C. 215a.

Neither Ocean ShoreCapital Bank nor OceanFirst can be certain when, or if, the conditions to the integrated mergersmerger will be satisfied or waived or that the integrated mergersmerger will be completed.

Termination of the Merger Agreement

The merger agreement can be terminated at any time prior to completion of the first-step merger in the following circumstances:

 

by mutual written consent, if the OceanFirst board and the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board so determine;

by the OceanFirst board or the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board if (i) any governmental entity that must grant a requisite regulatory approval denies any requisite regulatory approval in connection with the Transactionsmerger and such denial has become final and nonappealable, or (ii) any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has issued a final and nonappealable order prohibiting or making illegal the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or (iii) an application for a requisite regulatory approval has been withdrawn at the request of the applicable governmental entity, unless, in the case of clause (iii) the approval of such governmental entity is no longer necessary to consummate the merger or the applicable party intends to file a new application, filing, certificate or notice within 30 days of the withdrawal, unless, in the case of clauses (i), (ii) and (iii), the failure to obtain a requisite regulatory approval is due to the failure of the terminating party to perform or observe its obligations under the merger agreement;

 

by the OceanFirst board or the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board if the integrated mergers havemerger has not been consummated on or before the termination date, which is the one year anniversary of the date of the merger agreement,August 31, 2019, unless the failure of the integrated mergersmerger to be consummated by such date is due to the failure of the terminating party to perform or observe its obligations under the merger agreement;

 

by the OceanFirst board or the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board (except that the terminating party cannot then be in material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in the merger agreement) if the other party breaches any of its obligations or any of its representations and warranties (or any such representation or warranty ceases to be true) set forth in the merger agreement which either individually or in the aggregate would constitute, if occurring or continuing on the closing date, the failure of a closing condition of the terminating party and such breach is not cured within 45 days following written notice to the party committing such breach, or such breach cannot be cured during such period;

by the Ocean Shore board,beach (or such fewer days as remain prior to the time that the OceanFirst share issuance proposal is approved, if the OceanFirst board (i) fails to recommend in this joint proxy statement/prospectus that the OceanFirst stockholders approve the OceanFirst share issuance, or takes certain adverse actions with respect to such recommendation or (ii) breaches certain obligations, including with respect to calling a meeting of its stockholders and recommending that they approve the OceanFirst share issuance, in any material respect; ortermination date);

 

by the OceanFirst board, prior to the time that the Ocean Shore merger proposal is approved, if the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board (i) fails to recommend in this joint proxy statement/prospectus that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders approve the merger agreement, or takes certain adverse actions with respect to such recommendation, (ii) fails to recommend against acceptance of a publicly disclosed tender offer or exchange offer for outstanding Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock that has been publicly disclosed (other than by OceanFirst or an affiliate of OceanFirst) within ten10 business days after the commencement of such tender or exchange offer, (iii) recommends or endorses an acquisition proposal, or (iv) breaches certain obligations includingwith respect to acquisition proposals in any material respect or (v) materially breaches any of its obligations with respect to calling a meeting of its stockholders and recommending that they approve the merger agreement; or

by Capital Bank, following the Capital Bank stockholders meeting if Capital Bank (i) receives an acquisition proposal prior to such meeting, (ii) does not breach any of its obligations with respect to acquisition proposals or calling a meeting of its stockholders and recommending that they approve the merger agreement in any material respect.and (iii) fails to obtain the required vote of its stockholders at such meeting.

Additionally, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank may terminate the merger agreement if, at any time during thefive-day period commencing on the first business day following the last day of the determination period (as defined below) both of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the average daily closing price for OceanFirst common stock during the determination period (which we refer to as the “average closing price”) is less than $20.04 and (ii) the number obtained by dividing the OceanFirst average closing price by $25.06 (subject to certain adjustments), is less than the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the average of the daily closing value of the Nasdaq Bank Index for the determination period by (y) the closing value of the Nasdaq Bank Index on October 24, 2018 and subtracting 0.15 from the quotient. The “determination period” means (a) if the requisite regulatory approvals (or waivers) have been received and fifteen or fewer days remain in the same calendar month, then the 10 consecutive full trading days starting on the first trading day immediately following the date on which all requisite regulatory approvals (and waivers, if applicable) necessary for consummation of the integrated mergersmerger have been received (disregarding any waiting period) (which we refer to as the “determination date”) both ofor (b) if the following conditions are satisfied: (i)requisite regulatory approvals (or waivers) have been received and more than fifteen days remain in the OceanFirst market valuesame calendar

month, then the 10 consecutive full trading days ending on the day immediately prior to the determination date is less than $14.46 and (ii)(in either (a) or (b), such 10 trading day period being the number obtained by dividing the OceanFirst market value on the determination date by $18.08 (subject to certain adjustments), is less than the number obtained by dividing (x) the average of the daily closing value of the NASDAQ Bank Index for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the determination date by (y) the closing value of the NASDAQ Bank Index on July 12, 2016 minus 0.15.“determination period”).

If Ocean ShoreCapital Bank elects to exercise its termination right as described above, it must notify OceanFirst in writing of such election no later than the last day of the five day period commencing on the first business day following the last day of the determination date.period. During the five day period commencing with OceanFirst’s receipt of anysuch written notice, duly delivered by or on behalf of Ocean Shore electing to exercise Ocean Shore’s right to terminate the merger agreement as described above, OceanFirst will have the option to increase the exchange ratio to a level that would cause either of the requirements described in the first sentence of the preceding paragraph not to be satisfied. If, within such five day period, OceanFirst delivers written notice to Ocean ShoreCapital Bank that it intends to proceed with the integrated mergersmerger by paying such additional consideration,increasing the exchange ratio, and notifies Ocean ShoreCapital Bank of the revised exchange ratio, then no termination by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will have occurred, and the merger agreement will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms (except that the exchange ratio will have been so modified).

Effect of Termination

If the merger agreement is terminated, it will become void and have no effect, except that (i) each of OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will remain liable for any liabilities or damages arising out of its fraud or any knowing, intentional and material breach of any provision of the merger agreement by it and (ii) designated provisions of the merger agreement will survive the termination, including those relating to payment of termination fees and expenses and the confidential treatment of information.

Termination Fee

In the event that, after the date of the merger agreement and prior to the termination of the merger agreement, (i) a bona fide acquisition proposal has been made known to senior management of Capital Bank or the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board or has been made directly to itsCapital Bank stockholders generally or any person has publicly announced (and not withdrawn)an acquisition proposal or the intention to make an acquisition proposal with respect to Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, (ii) (A) thereafter the merger agreement is terminated by (A) either OceanFirst or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank because the integrated mergers havemerger has not been completed prior to the termination date,August 31, 2019, and without the requisite Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholder vote havinghas not been obtained or (B) thereafter the merger agreement is terminated by OceanFirst based on a willful breach of the merger agreement by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank that would constitute the failure of a closing condition and that has not been cured during the permitted time period or by its nature cannot be cured during such period and (iii) within 12 months after the date of such termination, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank enters into a definitive agreement or consummates a transaction with respect to an acquisition proposal (whether or not the same acquisition proposal as that referred to above), then Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will, on the earlier of the date it enters into such definitive agreement and the date of consummation of such transaction, pay OceanFirst, by wire transfer of same day funds, a $5.72$3.2 million termination fee.

In the event that the merger agreement is terminated by OceanFirst based on the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board having (i) failed to recommend in this joint proxy statement/prospectus that the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders approve the merger agreement, or withdrawn, modified or qualifiedhaving taken certain adverse actions with respect to such recommendation, in a manner adverse to OceanFirst, or resolved to do so, or failed to reaffirm such recommendation within two business days after OceanFirst has requested in writing that such action be taken, or(ii) failed to recommend against acceptance of a publicly disclosed tender offer or exchange offer for outstanding Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock that has been publicly disclosed (other than by OceanFirst or an affiliate of OceanFirst) within ten10 business days after the commencement of such tender or exchange offer, (ii)(iii) recommended or endorsed an acquisition proposal or (iii)(iv) breached certain obligations, including with respect to the non-solicitation of acquisition proposals or calling a meeting of its stockholders and recommending that the Ocean Shore stockholdersthey approve the merger agreement, in any material respect, then Ocean ShoreCapital Bank will pay OceanFirst, no later than the close of business on the second business day following the date of termination, by wire transfer of same day funds, a $5.72$3.2 million termination fee on the date of termination.fee.

OceanFirst will pay Ocean Shore, by wire transfer of same day funds on the date of termination, a $5.72 million termination fee, in the event thatIf the merger agreement is terminated by Ocean ShoreCapital Bank based on the OceanFirst boardCapital Bank having (i) failedreceived an acquisition proposal prior to recommend in this joint proxy statement/prospectus that the OceanFirstits stockholders approve the OceanFirst share issuance, or withdrawn, modified or qualified such recommendation in a manner adverse to Ocean Shore, or resolved to do so, or failed to reaffirm such recommendation within two business

days after Ocean Shore requests in writing that such action be taken ormeeting, (ii) not breached certainany of its obligations including with respect to acquisition proposals or calling a meeting of its stockholders and recommending that they approve the merger agreement and (iii) failed to obtain the required vote of its stockholders at such meeting, and if Capital Bank made an adverse recommendation change prior to the date of termination, Capital Bank will be required to pay OceanFirst, share issuance,by

wire transfer of same day funds, a $3.2 million termination fee on the date of termination. In addition, if Capital Bank terminates the merger agreement based on clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of preceding sentence and Capital Bank did not make an adverse recommendation change prior to termination and, if within 12 months after the date of termination, Capital Bank enters into a definitive agreement or consummates a transaction with respect to an acquisition proposal (regardless of whether it is the same or different acquisition proposal as that referenced in any material respect.clause (i) of the preceding sentences), Capital Bank will be required to pay OceanFirst, by wire transfer of same day funds, a $3.2 million termination fee on the earlier of the date Capital Bank enters into such definitive agreement or the date of consummation of such transaction.

Expenses and Fees

AllUnless expressly provided otherwise in the merger agreement, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby willare required to be paid by the party incurring such cost and expense, except that the costs and expenses of printing and mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus shall be borne proportionately by OceanFirst and Ocean Shore based on the number of stockholders of such party and all filing and other fees paid to the SEC in connection with the integrated mergersmerger will be borne equally by OceanFirst and Ocean Shore.Capital Bank.

Amendment, Waiver and Extension of the Merger Agreement

Subject to compliance with applicable law, the merger agreement may be amended by the parties at any time before or after approval of the matters presented in connection with integrated mergersthe merger by the stockholders of OceanFirst and the stockholders of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, except that after approval of the merger agreement by the Ocean Shore stockholders or the approvalrequisite vote of the issuance of shares of OceanFirst common stock in connection with the first-step merger by the OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders, there may not be, without further approval of such stockholders, any amendment of the merger agreement that requires further approval under applicable law.

At any time prior to the completion of the first-step merger, the parties may, to the extent legally permitted, extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other party, waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement or in any document delivered pursuant to the merger agreement, and waive compliance with any of the agreements or satisfaction of any conditions contained in the merger agreement, except that after approval of the merger agreement by the Ocean Shore stockholders or the approvalrequisite vote of the issuance of shares of OceanFirst common stock in connection with the first-step merger by the OceanFirstCapital Bank stockholders, there may not be, without further approval of such stockholders, any extension or waiver of the merger agreement or any portion thereof that requires further approval under applicable law.

Ocean ShoreCapital Bank Voting and Support Agreements

Simultaneously with the execution of the merger agreement, each of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s directors, solely in his or her capacity as an Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder, entered into a separate voting and support agreement with OceanFirst (which we refer to collectively as the “Ocean Shore voting“Capital Bank support agreements”), pursuant to which each such director agreed among other things, to vote all shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock that such director owns of record or beneficially and has the sole right to dispose of and vote, and any such shares that such director subsequently acquires, in favor of the approval of the merger agreement, and the approval of the first-step merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Each director also agreed to vote against (i) any acquisition proposal made in opposition to or otherwise in competition or inconsistent with the first-step merger or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, (ii) any agreement, amendment of any agreement (including the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank articles of incorporation and bylaws) or any other action that is intended or would reasonably be expected to prevent, impede, or, in any material respect, interfere with, delay, postpone or discourage the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and (iii) any action, agreement, transaction or proposal that would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant, agreement or other obligation of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank in the merger agreement. Each director also agreed to waive any applicable dissenters’ rights. As of the Ocean Shore record date, these stockholders beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 371,878[●] shares of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, allowing them to exercise approximately 5.7%[●]% of the voting power of the shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock outstanding as of the Ocean Shore record date.

The foregoing description of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank voting and support agreements is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank voting and support agreements, a form of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus asAnnex BC and is incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

ACCOUNTING TREATMENT

The integrated mergersmerger will be accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic805-10,Business Combinations. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets (including identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities (including executory contracts and other commitments) of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank as of the effective date of the integrated mergersmerger will be recorded at their respective fair values and added to those of OceanFirst. If the purchase price exceeds the difference between the fair value of assets acquired and the fair value of the liabilities assumed, then such excess will be recorded as goodwill. Financial statements of OceanFirst issued after the completion of the integrated mergersmerger will reflect these fair values and will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank before the integrated mergers.merger.

U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE INTEGRATED MERGERS

The following is a general discussion of thecertain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the integrated mergersmerger to “U.S. holders”a U.S. holder (as defined below) of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock and is based upon the Code, Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative rulings and judicial decisions in effect as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, all of which are subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such change could affect the accuracy of the statements and conclusions set forth in this discussion. This discussion does not address any tax consequences arising under the unearned income Medicare contribution tax pursuant to the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 nor does it address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction or under any U.S. federal laws other than those pertaining to the income tax.

The following discussion applies only to U.S. holders of Ocean Shore common stock who hold such shares as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). Further, this discussion does not purport to consider all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that might be relevant to U.S. holders in light of their particular circumstances and does not apply to U.S. holders subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws (such as, for example, dealers or brokers in securities, commodities or foreign currencies, traders in securities that elect to apply a mark-to-market method of accounting, banks and certain other financial institutions, insurance companies, mutual funds, tax-exempt organizations, holders subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code, partnerships, S corporations or other pass-through entities or investors in partnerships, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, former citizens or residents of the United States, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders who hold shares of Ocean Shore common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction or other integrated investment, holders who acquired Ocean Shorereceives OceanFirst common stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options, through a tax qualified retirement plan or otherwise as compensation, holders who exercise appraisal rights or holders who actually or constructively own five percent or more of Ocean Shore common stock).merger.

For purposes of this discussion, the terma “U.S. holder” means aany beneficial owner of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock who or that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i)(1) an individual citizen or resident of the United States, (ii)(2) a corporation or(or entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii)(3) a trust if (a) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (b) such trust has made a valid election to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or (iv)(4) an estate, the income of which is includiblesubject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source.

This discussion applies only to a U.S. holder that holds its shares of Capital Bank common stock as a capital asset (within the meaning of the Code) and exchanges those shares for the merger consideration in the merger. Further, this discussion is for general information only and does not purport to address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that might be relevant to a U.S. holder of Capital Bank common stock in light of its particular circumstances and does not apply to a U.S. holder of Capital Bank common stock subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws (such as, for example, dealers or brokers in securities, commodities or foreign currencies, traders in securities that elect to apply amark-to-market method of accounting, banks and certain other financial institutions, insurance companies, regulated investment companies and real estate investment trusts,tax-exempt organizations, holders subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code, S corporations, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders who hold shares of Capital Bank common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction or other integrated investment, holders who exercise appraisal rights, or holders required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardlesswith respect to OceanFirst common stock as a result of its source.such item being taken into account in an applicable financial statement). This discussion does not address any U.S. federal tax consequences other than U.S. federal income tax consequences (including any U.S. federal estate, gift, Medicare or alternative minimum taxes) or any U.S. state or local, ornon-U.S. tax consequences.

If an entity or an arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes that holds Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, and any partners in such partnership, shouldare strongly urged to consult their tax advisors regardingabout the tax consequences of the integrated mergersmerger to theirthem.

This discussion, is based upon the Code, the U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder and judicial and administrative authorities, rulings, and decisions, all as in effect on the date of this proxy statement/prospectus. These authorities may change, possibly with retroactive effect, and any such change could affect the accuracy of the statements and conclusions set forth in this discussion.

No ruling has been, or will be, requested from the IRS with respect to any of the U.S. federal income tax consequences described below and neither the conclusions nor the opinions described below will be binding on the IRS or any court. As a result, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not disagree with or challenge any of the conclusions described herein or that a court will not sustain a position contrary to any of the conclusions described herein.

The actual tax consequences of the merger to you will depend on your specific circumstances.situation. You are strongly urged to consult with your tax advisor as to the tax consequences of the merger to you in your particular circumstances, including the applicability and effect of any U.S. federal, state and local, foreign or other tax laws.

General

OceanFirst and Capital Bank intend for the merger, to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. It is a condition to the obligationobligations of OceanFirst and Ocean Shore to complete the integrated mergersmerger that they receive a writtenit receives an opinion from their counsel, datedSkadden and a condition to the closing dateobligations of Capital Bank to complete the integrated mergers,merger that it receives an opinion from Stevens & Lee, in forms reasonably satisfactory to OceanFirst and Capital Bank, respectively, to the effect that the integrated mergersmerger will togetherqualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Neither OceanFirst nor Capital Bank currently intends to waive these respective opinion conditions.

The opinions referred to above will be treatedbased on customary assumptions and representations from OceanFirst and Capital Bank, as an integrated transactionwell as certain covenants and undertakings by OceanFirst and Capital Bank. If any of the assumptions, representations, covenants or undertakings is incorrect, incomplete, inaccurate or is violated, the validity of the opinions may be affected and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger could differ materially from those described in this proxy statement/prospectus.

An opinion of counsel represents counsel’s legal judgment but is not binding on the IRS or any court and there can be no certainty that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions reflected in the opinions or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. Neither OceanFirst nor Capital Bank intends to obtain a ruling from the IRS with respect to the tax consequences of the merger. If the IRS were to successfully challenge the “reorganization” status of the merger, the tax consequences would be different from those set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus.

The following discussion assumes that the merger qualifies as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In the opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, the integrated mergers will together be treated as an integrated transaction that qualifies as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a)

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the code, withMerger to U.S. Holders

Upon the tax consequences described below. These opinionsexchange of counsel will be given in reliance on facts and representations contained in representation letters provided by OceanFirst and Ocean Shore and on customary assumptions.

These opinions will not be binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or any court. OceanFirst and Ocean Shore have not sought and will not seek any ruling from the IRS regarding any matters relating to the integrated mergers and, as a result, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the conclusions set forth below. In addition, if any of the representations or assumptions upon which those opinions are based are inconsistent with the actual facts, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the integrated mergers could be adversely affected.

U.S. holders of Ocean Shoreholder’s Capital Bank common stock generally will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the U.S. holder’s gain realized (i.e., the excess, if any, of the sum of the amount of cash consideration and the fair market value (as of the effective time of the integrated mergers) of thefor OceanFirst common stock received overin the merger, a U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares of Ocean Shore common stock surrendered) and (ii) the amount of cash consideration received pursuant to the integrated mergers. Anyholder generally will not recognize gain or loss, realized generally must be calculated separately for each identifiable block of shares surrendered in the exchange, and a loss realized on one block of shares may not be usedexcept with respect to offset a gain realized on another block of shares. Any recognized gain generally will be long-term capital gain if the U.S. holder’s holding period for its Ocean Shore common stock exceeds one year at the effective time of the integrated mergers (except for gain treated as a dividend, as discussed below).

A U.S. holder’s aggregate tax basis in its OceanFirst common stock received pursuant to the integrated mergers, including the basis allocable to any fractional share of OceanFirst common stock for which cash is received, will be equal to the U.S. holder’s aggregate tax basis in the Ocean Shore common stock surrendered pursuant to the integrated mergers, decreased by the amount of cash received (excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional shareshares of OceanFirst common stock)stock (as discussed below). Further, such holder will have the same aggregate tax basis and increased by the amount of gain, if any, recognized or any amount treated as a dividend, as described below (but excluding any gain resulting from the deemed receipt and redemption of fractional shares).

A U.S. holder’s holding period in its OceanFirst common stock received pursuant to the integrated mergers will include the holding period for its shares of Ocean Shore common stock surrendered in exchange therefor. U.S. holders who hold shares of Ocean Shore common stock with differing bases or holding periods should consult their tax advisors with regard to identifying the bases or holding periods of the particular shares of OceanFirst common stock received in the integrated mergers.merger (including any fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock deemed received and exchanged for cash as described below) equal to such holder’s tax basis and holding period in the Capital Bank common stock surrendered in exchange therefor.

Potential Treatment of Cash as a Dividend. The receipt of cash by aA U.S. holder may havethat acquired different blocks of Capital Bank common stock at different times or different prices should consult its tax advisor regarding the effect of a distribution of a dividend,manner in which case any gain recognized willthe basis and holding period should be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent ofallocated among the U.S. holder’s ratable share of Ocean Shore’s accumulated “earnings and profits.” In general, the determination of whether such gain recognized will be treated as capital gain or has the effect of a distribution of a dividend depends upon whether and to what extent the exchange reduces the U.S. holder’s deemed percentage of stock ownership of OceanFirst. For purposes of this determination, the U.S. holder generally will be treated as if it first exchanged all of its shares of Ocean Shore common stock solely for OceanFirst common stock and then OceanFirst immediately redeemed a portion of the OceanFirstCapital Bank common stock in exchange for the cash the U.S. holder actually received, which redemption we refer to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the “deemed redemption.” Such gain recognized by a U.S. holder pursuant to the deemed redemption will be treated as capital gain if the deemed redemption is (i) “substantially disproportionate” with respect to the U.S. holder (and after the deemed redemption the U.S. holder actually or constructively owns less than 50% of the voting power of the outstanding OceanFirst common stock) or (ii) not “essentially equivalent to a dividend.”holder’s particular circumstance.

The deemed redemption generally will be “substantially disproportionate” with respect to a U.S. holder if the percentage of the outstanding OceanFirst common stock that the U.S. holder actually and constructively owns immediately after the deemed redemption is less than 80% of the percentage of the outstanding OceanFirst common stock that the U.S. holder is deemed actually and constructively to have owned immediately before the deemed redemption. The deemed redemption will not be considered to be “essentially equivalent to a dividend”

if it results in a “meaningful reduction” in the U.S. holder’s deemed percentage of stock ownership of OceanFirst. The IRS has ruled that a minority stockholder in a publicly held corporation whose relative stock interest is minimal and who exercises no control with respect to corporate affairs is considered to have experienced a “meaningful reduction” if the stockholder has at least a relatively minor reduction in such stockholder’s percentage of stock ownership under the above analysis. In applying the above tests, the U.S. holder may, under the constructive ownership rules, be deemed to own stock that is owned by other persons or otherwise in addition to the stock the U.S. holder actually owns or owned.

Cash In Lieu of Fractional Shares. A

If a U.S. holder that receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of OceanFirst common stock, generallythe U.S. holder will be treated as having received such fractional share of OceanFirst common stock pursuant to the merger and then as having received such cash in redemptionexchange for such fractional share of OceanFirst common stock. As a result, the fractional share. GainU.S. holder generally will recognize gain or loss generally will be recognized based onequal to the difference between the amount of cash received in lieu of thea fractional share and the portion of the U.S. holder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the sharesfractional share of Ocean ShoreOceanFirst common stock surrendered which is allocable to the fractional share.stock. Such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss and will belong-term capital gain or loss if, as of the effective time, the U.S. holder’s holding period for its Ocean Shoresuch fractional share (including the holding period of shares of Capital Bank common stock surrendered therefor) exceeds one year atyear.

Certain Reporting Requirements

If a U.S. holder receives OceanFirst common stock pursuant to the effective time of the integrated mergers.

This discussion ofmerger and is considered a “significant holder,” it will be required (1) to file a statement with its U.S. federal income tax consequencesreturn providing certain facts pertinent to the merger, including its tax basis in, and the fair market value of, the Capital Bank common stock that it surrendered, and (2) to retain permanent records of these facts relating to the merger. A holder of Capital Bank common stock is considered a “significant holder” if, immediately before the merger, such holder (a) owned at least 1% (by vote or value) of the outstanding stock of Capital Bank, or (b) owned Capital Bank securities with a tax basis of $1.0 million or more.

This discussion is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be, and shouldmay not be construed as, tax advice. Determining the actual tax consequencesHolders of the integrated mergersCapital Bank common stock are urged to you may be complex and will depend on your specific situation and on factors that are not within our control. You should consult yourtheir tax advisors with respect to the application of U.S. federal income tax laws to yourtheir particular situations as well as any tax consequences arising under the U.S. federal estate or gift tax rules, or under the laws of any state, local, foreign or other taxing jurisdiction or under any applicable tax treaty.jurisdiction.

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF OCEANFIRST

The following is a brief description of the terms of the capital stock of OceanFirst. This summary does not purport to be complete in all respects. This description is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the DGCL, federal law, OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation, as amended, and OceanFirst’s bylaws.bylaws, as amended, and, where applicable, federal banking law. Copies of OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws have been filed with the SEC and are also available upon request from OceanFirst. To find out where copies of these documents can be obtained, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[].

Authorized Capital Stock

OceanFirst’s authorized capital stock consists of 55,000,000150,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share.

Common Stock

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation currently authorizes the issuance of up to 55,000,000150,000,000 shares of common stock. As of [●], 2018, the OceanFirst recordmost recent practicable date before the printing of this proxy statement/prospectus, there were (i) 25,850,956[●] shares of OceanFirst common stock issued and outstanding, including 154,445 shares of OceanFirst common stock issued in respect of outstanding awards of restricted OceanFirst common stock under OceanFirst equity plans (or in the former Cape equity plans that were assumed by OceanFirst in the Cape acquisition (which we refer to as the “Cape equity plans”)), (ii) 7,715,816no shares of OceanFirst common stock held in treasury, and (iii) 2,627,468[●] shares of OceanFirst common stock reserved for issuance in respect of awards of restricted OceanFirst common stock or upon the exercise of outstanding stock options to purchase shares of OceanFirst common stock granted under suchcertain OceanFirst equity compensation plans and the equity compensation plans of acquired companies, (iv) [●] shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of warrants assumed in connection with the acquisition of Colonial American Bank and (v) no other shares of capital stock or the Cape equity plans.or voting securities of OceanFirst issued, reserved for issuance or outstanding.

OceanFirst common stock is currently listed for quotation on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OCFC.”

Preemptive Rights; Redemption Rights; Terms of Conversion; Sinking Fund and Redemption ProvisionProvisions

OceanFirst’sOceanFirst common stock does not have preemptive rights, redemption rights, conversion rights or any sinking fund or redemption provisions.

Voting Rights

The holders of OceanFirst common stock have exclusive voting rights in OceanFirst. They elect the OceanFirst board and act on other matters as are required to be presented to them under Delaware law or as are otherwise presented to them by the OceanFirst board. Generally, each holderholders of common stock isare entitled to one vote per share and willdo not have any right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation provides that stockholders who beneficially own in excess of 10% of the then outstandingthen-outstanding shares of OceanFirst common stock are not entitled to any vote with respect to the shares held in excess of the 10% limit. A person or entity is deemed to beneficially own shares that are owned by an affiliate as well as persons acting in concert with such person or entity. If OceanFirst issues shares of preferred stock, holders of the preferred stock may also possess voting rights. Certain matters require an 80% stockholder vote, which is calculated after giving effect to the provision in OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation limiting voting rights as described above.

Liquidation Rights

In the event of OceanFirst’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of common stock would be entitled to receive, after payment or provision for payment of all its debts and liabilities, all of the assets of OceanFirst available for distribution. If preferred stock is issued, the holders thereof may have a priority over the holders of

the common stock in the event of liquidation or dissolution. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of OceanFirst Bank, OceanFirst, as the holder of 100% of OceanFirst Bank’s capital stock, would be entitled to receive, after payment or provision for payment of all debts and liabilities of OceanFirst Bank, including all deposit accounts and accrued interest thereon, and after distribution of the balance in the special liquidation account to eligible account holders and supplemental eligible account holders, all assets of OceanFirst Bank available for distribution.

Dividend Rights

Holders of OceanFirst common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by the OceanFirst board out of legally available funds. The ability of the OceanFirst board to declare and pay dividends on OceanFirst common stock is subject to the terms of applicable Delaware law and banking regulations. If OceanFirst issues shares of preferred stock, the holders thereof may have a priority over the holders of the common stock with respect to dividends. For more information regarding OceanFirst’s ability to pay dividends, see the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The TransactionsMerger — Dividend Policy” beginning on page 92[●] and “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[●]. OceanFirst’s principal source of income is dividends that are declared and paid by OceanFirst Bank on its capital stock. Therefore, OceanFirst’s ability to pay dividends is dependent upon theits receipt of dividends from OceanFirst Bank. Insured depository institutions such as OceanFirst Bank are prohibited from making capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become “undercapitalized,” as such term is defined in the applicable law and regulations. In the future, any declaration and payment of cash dividends will be subject to the OceanFirst board’s evaluation of OceanFirst’s operating results, financial condition, future growth plans, general business and economic conditions, and tax and other relevant considerations. The payment of cash dividends by OceanFirst in the future will also be subject to certain other legal and regulatory limitations and ongoing review by the OceanFirst’s banking regulators.

Restrictions on Ownership

HOLA requiresBanking laws impose notice, approval and ongoing regulatory requirements on any “savingsstockholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured depository institution. These laws include the Bank Holding Company Act (which we refer to as the “BHC Act”) and loanthe Change in Bank Control Act. Among other things, these laws require regulatory filings by a stockholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured depository institution. The determination whether an investor “controls” a depository institution is based on all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the investment. OceanFirst is a bank holding company” as and therefore the BHC Act would require any “bank holding company” (as defined in HOLA,the BHC Act) to obtain theprior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring more than 5% or more of OceanFirst common stock. Any person other(other than a savings and loanbank holding company,company) is required to obtain the approval ofprovide prior notice to the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring 10% or more of OceanFirst common stock under the Change in Bank Control Act.Act of 1978. Ownership by affiliated parties, or parties acting in concert, is typically aggregated for these purposes. Any person (other than an individual) who (a) owns, controls or has the power to vote 25% or more of any class of OceanFirst’s voting securities; (b) has the ability to elect or appoint a majority of the OceanFirst board; or (c) otherwise exerciseshas the ability to exercise a “controlling influence” over OceanFirst, is subject to regulation as a savings and loanbank holding company under HOLA.the BHC Act.

Preferred Stock

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation authorizes the OceanFirst board, without further stockholder action, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation further authorizes the OceanFirst board, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, to provide for the issuance of the shares of preferred stock in series, and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions

thereof. As of [●], 2018, the OceanFirst recordmost recent practicable date before the printing of this proxy statement/prospectus, there were no shares of OceanFirst preferred stock outstanding. Preferred stock may be issued with preferences and designations as the OceanFirst board may from time to time determine. The OceanFirst board may, without stockholder approval, issue shares of preferred stock with voting, dividend, liquidation and conversion rights that could dilute the voting strengthpower of the holders of OceanFirst common stock and may assist management in impeding an unfriendly takeover or attempted change in control.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2016 presents the pro forma consolidated financial position of OceanFirst giving effect to the Transactions. The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statements for the periods ending December 31, 20152017 and JuneSeptember 30, 20162018 present the pro forma results of operations of OceanFirst giving effect to each of the OceanFirst business combinations (with separate columns to present the pro forma effect of the Transactions and the Cape acquisition) assuming that each OceanFirst business combination became effective on January 1, 2015.Sun acquisition. These unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are derived from and should be read in conjunction with the following historical financial statements after giving effect to the applicable OceanFirst business combination, and the adjustments described in the following footnotes, and are intended to reflect the impact of the applicable OceanFirst business combinationSun acquisition on OceanFirst:

 

separate historical audited consolidated financial statements of Ocean Shore as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the related notes thereto, which are available in Ocean Shore’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus;

separate historical consolidated financial statements of Ocean Shore as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and the related notes thereto, which are available in Ocean Shore’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus;

separate historical audited consolidated financial statements of OceanFirst as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, and the related notes thereto, which are available in OceanFirst’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152017 and are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus;

 

separate historical consolidated financial statements of OceanFirst as of and for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2016,2018, and the related notes thereto, which are available in OceanFirst’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 20162018 and are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus; and

 

separate historical audited consolidated financial statements of CapeSun as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, and the related notes thereto, which are incorporated by referenceincluded elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus from Cape’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forprospectus.

We have not included an unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet reflecting the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015; and

(a) separateimpact of the Sun acquisition because Sun is already reflected in OceanFirst’s historical consolidated financial statements of Capecondition as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, and the related notes thereto, which are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus from Cape’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2016; and (b) the internal accounting records of Cape for the period beginning on March 31, 2016 and ending on AprilSeptember 30, 2016, the last business day prior to the completion of the Cape acquisition.

2018. The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect the realization of potential cost savings, revenue synergies or any potential restructuring costs. Certain cost savings and revenue synergies may result from the Transactions.continued integration of Sun and OceanFirst. However, there can be no assurance that these cost savings or revenue synergies will be achieved. Cost savings, if achieved, could result from, among other things, the reduction of operating expenses, changes in corporate infrastructure and governance, the elimination of duplicative operating systems and the combination of regulatory and financial reporting requirements under one federally-chartered bank. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the financial position or results of operations actually would have been had the TransactionsSun acquisition been completed at the datesbeginning of the periods indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro forma combined financial information does not purport to project the future financial position or operating results of the combined company at any time in the future, including after completion of the Transactions.merger.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AS OF JUNEINCOME

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 20162018

REFLECTING THE TRANSACTIONSSUN ACQUISITION

 

   OceanFirst (As
Reported)
  Ocean Shore
(As Reported)
  Adjustments to
Reflect
Acquisition of
Ocean Shore
      OceanFirst
(Pro-forma)
 
(in thousands)                 

Assets

       

Cash and due from financial institutions and interest-bearing bank balances

  $66,222   $86,205   $(39,283  (a  $113,144  

Securities and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

   547,358    113,506    55    (b   660,919  

Loans receivable, net

   3,130,046    791,219    7,966    (c   3,929,231  

Mortgage loans held for sale

   5,310    —      —        5,310  

Other assets

   190,500    42,744    (1,384  (d   231,860  

Deferred tax asset

   37,052    4,140    (2,191  (e   39,001  

Core deposit intangible

   3,903    391    7,631    (f   11,925  

Goodwill

   67,102    4,630    39,617    (g   111,349  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

  $4,047,493   $1,042,835   $12,411     $5,102,739  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

       

Deposits

  $3,206,262   $806,701   $975    (h  $4,013,938  

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

   402,776    105,000    7,447    (i   515,223  

Other liabilities

   29,197    15,483    —        44,680  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   3,638,235    927,184    8,422      4,573,841  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

       

Common stock

   336    73    (73  (j   336  

Additional paid-in capital

   308,460    66,650    52,990    (j   428,100  

Retained earnings

   230,895    65,243    (65,243  (j   230,895  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (5,798  (752  752    (j   (5,798

Less: Unallocated common stock held by

       

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

   (2,903  (2,126  2,126    (j   (2,903

Deferred compensation plans trust

   —      (878  878    (j   —    

Treasury stock

   (121,732  (12,559  12,559    (j   (121,732
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   409,258    115,651    3,989      528,898  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $4,047,493   $1,042,835   $12,411     $5,102,739  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 
(in thousands, except per share amounts) OceanFirst
(As Reported)
  Sun(1)  Adjustments to
Reflect
Acquisition of
Sun
     OceanFirst
(Pro-forma)
 

INTEREST INCOME

     

Loans

 $184,229  $5,680  $765   (a $190,674 

Securities and other

  20,067   599   80   (b  20,746 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest income

  204,296   6,279   845    211,420 

INTEREST EXPENSE

     

Deposits

  15,510   550   (46  (c  16,014 

Borrowed funds

  10,125   312   82   (d  10,519 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

  25,635   862   36    26,533 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

  178,661   5,417   809    184,887 

Provision for loan losses

  2,984   —     —      2,984 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  175,677   5,417   809    181,903 

NON-INTEREST INCOME

     

Fees and service charges

  22,989   370   —      23,359 

Other

  3,090   445   —      3,535 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totalnon-interest income

  26,079   815   —      26,894 

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

     

Compensation and employee benefits

  64,189   8,676   —      72,865 

Occupancy and equipment

  19,586   1,064   (128  (e  20,522 

Other operating expenses

  31,878   7,491   —      39,369 

Amortization of core deposit intangible

  2,828   —     180   (f  3,008 

Branch consolidation expenses

  2,911   —     —      2,911 

Merger related expenses

  25,863   —     —      25,863 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totalnon-interest expense

  147,255   17,231   52    164,538 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes

  54,501   (10,999  757    44,259 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

  9,301   (776  159   (g  8,684 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $45,200  $(10,223 $598   $35,575 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share

     

Basic

 $0.97  $(0.68   $0.74 

Diluted

 $0.95  $(0.68   $0.72 

Weighted Average Common Shares

     

Basic

  46,451   15,092   (13,378  (h  48,165 

Diluted

  47,403   15,092   (13,378  (h  49,117 

(1)

As included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.

See “Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements” below for additional information.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

REFLECTING THE TRANSACTIONS

  OceanFirst
(As
Reported)
  Cape
January 1,
2016 to
May 1,
2016
  Adjustments
to Reflect
OceanFirst’s
Acquisition
of Cape
    OceanFirst
(Pro-forma
with Cape)
  Ocean
Shore (As
Reported)
  Adjustments
to Reflect
OceanFirst’s
Acquisition
of Ocean
Shore
    OceanFirst
(Pro-forma)
 
(in thousands, except per share amounts)                         

INTEREST INCOME

         

Loans

 $51,556   $18,207   $1,777   (k) $71,540   $16,342   $(917 (k) $86,965  

Investment securities and other

  4,658    1,778    (78 (l)  6,358    1,331    (4 (l)  7,685  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest income

  56,214    19,985    1,699     77,898    17,673    (921   94,650  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

INTEREST EXPENSE

         

Deposits

  3,042    1,349    (220 (m)  4,171    1,318    (488 (m)  5,001  

Borrowed funds

  2,599    3,108    —       5,707    1,708    (931 (n)  6,484  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

  5,641    4,457    (220   9,878    3,026    (1,419   11,485  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

  50,573    15,528    1,919     68,020    14,647    498     83,165  

Provision for loan losses

  1,225    1,216    —       2,441    313    —       2,754  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  49,348    14,312    1,919     65,579    14,334    498     80,411  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NON-INTEREST INCOME

         

Fees and service charges

  7,703    1,376    —       9,079    888    —       9,967  

Net gain on sale of loans available for sale

  349    93    —       442    —      —       442  

Net loss on sale of investment securities available for sale

  (12  61    —       49    —      —       49  

Net loss from other real estate operations

  (719  101    —       (618  —      —       (618

Income from Bank Owned Life Insurance

  861    436    —       1,297    311    —       1,608  

Bargain purchase gain

  —      —      —       —      —      —       —    

Other

  77    163    —       240    876    —       1,116  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

  8,259    2,230    —       10,489    2,075    —       12,564  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

         

Compensation and employee benefits

  19,898    7,496    —       27,394    6,652    —       34,046  

Occupancy and equipment

  5,790    1,615    (26 (o)  7,379    2,423    (23 (o)  9,779  

Other operating expenses

  10,808    4,379    —       15,187    1,954    —       17,141  

Amortization of core deposit intangible

  138    62    163   (p)  363    49    681   (p)  1,093  

Expense from prepayment of borrowings

  136    749    —       885    —      —       885  

Merger related expense

  8,591    4,237    (12,828 (q)  —      —      —       —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest expense

  45,361    18,538    (12,691   51,208    11,078    658     62,944  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

  12,246    (1,996  14,610     24,860    5,331    (160   30,031  

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

  4,380    984    4,667   (r)  10,031    1,799    (56 (r)  11,774  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

 $7,866   $(2,980 $9,943     14,829   $3,532   $(104  $18,257  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per common share

         

Basic

 $0.40   $(0.23 $—      $0.53   $0.58    —      $0.54  

Diluted

 $0.39   $(0.23 $—      $0.52   $0.57    —      $0.53  

Weighted Average Common Shares

         

Basic

  19,694    12,815    (4,645 (s)  27,864    6,134    (204 (s)  33,794  

Diluted

  19,996    13,107    (4,751 (s)  28,352    6,242    (208 (s)  34,386  

See “Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements” below for additional information.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152017

REFLECTING THE TRANSACTIONSSUN ACQUISITION

 

 OceanFirst
(As
Reported)
 Cape (As
Reported)
 Adjustments
to Reflect
OceanFirst’s
Acquisition
of Cape
 OceanFirst
(Pro-forma
with Cape)
 Ocean
Shore (As
Reported)
 Adjustments
to Reflect
OceanFirst’s
Acquisition
of Ocean
Shore
 OceanFirst
(Pro-
forma)
 
(in thousands, except per share amounts)                OceanFirst (As
Reported)
 Sun
(As Reported)
 Adjustments to
Reflect
Acquisition of
Sun
   OceanFirst
(Pro-forma)
 

INTEREST INCOME

              

Loans

 $77,694   $46,372   $4,945   (k) $129,011   $32,715   $(1,834 (k) $159,892   $170,588  $65,312  $10,506  (a $246,406 

Investment securities and other

 8,169   4,703   (225 (l) 12,647   2,435   (8 (l) 15,074  

Securities and other

 18,241  7,942  954  (b 27,137 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total interest income

 85,863   51,075   4,720    141,658   35,150   (1,842  174,966   188,829  73,254  11,460   273,543 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

INTEREST EXPENSE

              

Deposits

 4,301   3,675   (565 (m) 7,411   2,537   (975 (m) 8,973   12,336  6,669  (1,015 (c 17,990 

Borrowed funds

 4,733   2,348    —      7,081   4,159   (1,862 (n) 9,378   7,275  4,781  973  (d 13,029 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total interest expense

 9,034   6,023   (565  14,492   6,696   (2,837  18,351   19,611  11,450  (42  31,019 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net interest income

 76,829   45,052   5,285    127,166   28,454   995    156,615   169,218  61,804  11,502   242,524 

Provision for loan losses

 1,275   2,675    —      3,950   689    —      4,639   4,445  (1,531  —     2,914 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 75,554   42,377   5,285    123,216   27,765   995    151,976   164,773  63,335  11,502   239,610 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

NON-INTEREST INCOME

              

Fees and service charges

 14,116   4,099    —      18,215   1,986    —      20,201   24,173  8,416   —     32,589 

Net gain on sale of loan servicing

 111    —      —      111    —       111  

Net gain on sale of loans available for sale

 822   68    —      890    —      —      890  

Net loss on sale of investment securities available for sale

  —     150    —      150   3    —      153  

Net loss from other real estate operations

 (149 (297  —      (446  —      —      (446

Income from Bank Owned Life Insurance

 1,501   1,211    —      2,712   629    —      3,341  

Bargain purchase gain

  —     6,479    —      6,479    —      —      6,479  

Other

 25   766    —      791   1,772    —      2,563   2,899  3,472   —     6,371 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total non-interest income

 16,426   12,476    —      28,902   4,390    —      33,292   27,072  11,888   —     38,960 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

        —           

Compensation and employee benefits

 31,946   19,103    —      51,049   12,864��   —      63,913   60,100  37,768   —     97,868 

Occupancy and equipment

 9,447   4,000   (78 (o) 13,369   5,001   (46 (o) 18,324   17,426  13,344  (1,537 (e 29,233 

Other operating expenses

 17,483   13,507    —      30,990   3,927    —      34,917   32,457  12,971   —     45,428 

Amortization of core deposit intangible

 21   144   517   (p) 682   96   1,364   (p) 2,142   2,039   —    2,163  (f 4,202 

Merger related expense

 1,878   2,305    —      4,183    —      —      4,183  

Branch consolidation expenses

 6,205   —     —     6,205 

Merger related expenses

 8,293   —     —     8,293 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total non-interest expense

 60,775   39,059   439    100,273   21,888   1,318    123,479   126,520  64,083  626   191,229 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

 31,205   15,794   4,846    51,845   10,267   (323  61,789   65,325  11,140  10,876   87,341 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 10,883   3,639   1,696   (r) 16,218   3,399   (113 (r) 19,504   22,855  (1,437 3,807  (g 25,225 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net income

 $20,322   $12,155   $3,150    $35,627   $6,868   $(210  $42,285   $42,470  $12,577  $7,069   $62,116 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net income per common share

              

Basic

 $1.22   $0.97    —      $1.45   $1.14    —      $1.39   $1.32  $0.66    $1.32 

Diluted

 $1.21   $0.96    —      $1.43   $1.12    —      $1.37   $1.28  $0.65    $1.29 

Weighted Average Common Shares

              

Basic

 16,600   12,548   (4,549 (s) 24,599   6,015   (200 (s) 30,414   32,113  19,061  (3,969 (h 47,205 

Diluted

 16,811   12,718   (4,610 (s) 24,919   6,124   (204 (s) 30,839   33,125  19,230  (4,138 (h 48,217 

See “Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements” below for additional information.

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements

Note 1. Description of OceanFirst Business Combinations

Business Combination with Ocean ShoreSun

On July 12, 2016, OceanFirst and Ocean Shore publicly announced that they had entered into the merger agreement pursuant to which, (i) Merger Sub will merge with and into Ocean Shore, with Ocean Shore surviving; (ii) immediately thereafter, Ocean Shore will merge with and into OceanFirst, with OceanFirst surviving; and (iii) immediately thereafter, Ocean Shore Bank will merge with and into OceanFirst Bank, with OceanFirst Bank surviving.

If the first-step merger is completed, each outstanding share of Ocean Shore common stock, except for certain shares of Ocean Shore common stock owned by Ocean Shore or OceanFirst, will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration. OceanFirst will not issue any fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock in the first-step merger. Ocean Shore stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fraction of a share of OceanFirst common stock upon the completion of the first-step merger will instead be entitled to receive an amount in cash, rounded to the nearest cent, determined by multiplying the fraction of a share (rounded to the nearest thousandth when expressed as a decimal form) of OceanFirst common stock to which the holder would otherwise be entitled by the average closing-sale price per share of OceanFirst common stock on the NASDAQ (as reported by TheWall Street Journal) for the five full trading days ending on the day preceding the day on which the first-step merger is completed.

Business Combination with Cape

On May 2, 2016,January 31, 2018, OceanFirst completed its previously announced the Sun acquisition of Cape. Pursuantpursuant to the termsAgreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2017 (which we refer to as the definitive agreement governing the Cape acquisition,“Sun merger agreement”), under which (i) Mercury Merger Sub Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst (which we refer to as the “merger sub”), merged with and into Cape,Sun, with Cape surviving;Sun continuing as the surviving corporation in such merger and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst (which we refer to as the “first-step merger”); (ii) immediately thereafter, CapeSun, as the surviving corporation in the first-step merger, merged with and into OceanFirst, with OceanFirst surviving;being the surviving corporation; and (iii) immediately thereafter, CapeSun National Bank merged with and into OceanFirst Bank with OceanFirst Bank surviving. As reportedbeing the surviving bank.

At the time the first-step merger was completed, each issued and outstanding share of common stock of Sun, par value $5.00 per share (which we refer to as the “Sun common stock”), except for certain shares of Sun common stock owned by Sun or OceanFirst, was converted into the right to receive either: (i) the cash consideration, which is an amount in OceanFirst’s Quarterly Reportcash equal to $24.99 (which is the sum of (A) $3.78 plus (B) $21.21, which is the product of 0.7884 multiplied $26.9058, the VWAP for shares of OceanFirst common stock on Form 10-Qthe NASDAQ for the five trading day period ending June 30, 2016,on January 31, 2018 (the “OceanFirst share closing price”)), or (ii) the totalstock consideration, paid bywhich is 0.9289 shares of OceanFirst incommon stock (which is a number of shares of OceanFirst common stock equal to the Cape acquisition was $196.4 million, includingquotient of (A) the cash consideration divided by (B) the OceanFirst share closing price). The elections of $30.5 million.the holders of Sun common stock were subject to the allocation and proration provisions of the Sun merger agreement. The aggregate amount of cash consideration was approximately $72.4 million with 2,895,825 shares of Sun common stock being converted into the right to receive the cash consideration, and the remaining shares of Sun common stock being converted into the right to receive the stock consideration. The number of shares of OceanFirst common stock issuable as the stock consideration was 15,093,507. Based on the results of the elections, the cash consideration was oversubscribed. Accordingly, (i) all of the Sun shares with respect to which a valid stock election was made, and all of thenon-election shares under the Sun merger agreement, were converted into the right to receive the stock consideration and (ii) 34% of the shares of Sun common stock with respect to which a valid cash election was made (the “cash election shares”) were converted into the right to receive the cash consideration, while the remaining 66% of the cash election shares were converted into the right to receive the stock consideration.

Note 2. Basis of Presentation

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements included hereinin this proxy statement/prospectus have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and certain footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared based upon available information and certain assumptions that OceanFirst and Ocean Shore believe are reasonable under the circumstances. A final determination of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which could not be made at the time that this document was prepared, may differ materially from the preliminary estimates. The final valuation may change the purchase price allocation, which could affect the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and could result in a change to the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements.

Business Combination with Ocean ShoreSun

With respect to the Transactions,Sun acquisition, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information assumes that the Transactions will be accounted for underwere prepared using the acquisition method of accounting with OceanFirst treated as

the acquirer. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities of Ocean Shore,Sun, as of the effective date of the Transactions, will beSun acquisition, were recorded by OceanFirst at their respective estimated fair values and the excess of the merger consideration received in the Sun acquisition over the fair value of Ocean Shore’sSun’s net identifiable assets will be allocated to goodwill.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of financial condition as of June 30, 2016 reflects the Transactions as if they had been completed as of June 30, 2016. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of financial condition has been adjusted to reflect the preliminary allocation of the estimated purchase price to identifiable net assets acquired in the Transactions. The estimated purchase price was calculated based upon $18.96 per share, the closing trading price of OceanFirst common stock on August 9, 2016, which was the latest practicable trading date before the date of this document. The final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after the completion of the Transactions. This allocation is dependent upon certain valuations and other studies that have not progressed to a stage where sufficient information is available to make a definitive allocation. The purchase price allocation adjustments and related amortization reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements are preliminary and have been made solely for the purpose of preparing these statements. The final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after the Transactions are completed and after completion of a thorough analysis to determine the fair value of Ocean Shore’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities as of the date that the Transactions are completed.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statements for the periods ending December 31, 20152017 and JuneSeptember 30, 20162018 reflect the results of operations of OceanFirst giving effect to the TransactionsSun acquisition as if theyit had been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented

become effective on January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2018, respectively, and combines OceanFirst’s historical results for both such periods with the historical results of Ocean Shore.Sun.

OceanFirst has incurred and expects to incurcontinue incurring costs associated with integrating Ocean Shore.Sun. Unless indicated otherwise, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not reflect nonrecurring transaction costs, the cost of any integration activities or the benefits that may result from synergies that may be derived from any integration activities.

Business Combination with CapePro forma Adjustments

The Cape acquisition, which(a) Interest income on loans was consummatedadjusted to reflect the difference between the contractual interest rate earned on May 2, 2016,loans and estimated discount accretion over the remaining life of the acquired loans based on current market yields for similar loans.

(b) Interest income on securities was accountedadjusted to reflect the difference between the contractual interest rate earned on securities and estimated discount accretion over the remaining life of the securities based on current market yields for undersimilar securities.

(c) Interest expense on deposits was adjusted to reflect the acquisition methodamortization of accounting with OceanFirst treated as the acquiror. Undertime deposit fair value premium over the acquisition methodremaining life of accounting, the consideration paid by OceanFirst has been allocatedtime deposits.

(d) Interest expense on borrowings was adjusted to reflect the assets acquired and liabilities assumedaccretion of Cape based upon theirthe estimated fair values, net of tax. The excess of consideration paidvalue discount over the remaining life of the borrowings.

(e) Occupancy expense was adjusted to reflect the accretion of the fair values of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill.market value discount on premises and equipment.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of income(f) Adjustment reflects the Cape acquisition as if it had been consummated at the beginningamortization of core deposit intangible over an estimated ten year useful life and calculated on a sum of the periods presented and combines OceanFirst’s historical results foryears digits basis.

(g) Adjustment reflects the year ended December 31, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2016 with historical results for the same periods for Cape.

OceanFirst has incurred and expects to continue incurring costs associated with integrating Cape. Unless indicated otherwise, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statementstax impact of income do not reflect nonrecurring transaction costs, the cost of any integration activities or the benefits that may result from synergies that may be derived from any integration activities.

Note 3. Purchase Price Allocation

Below is a summary of the purchase price allocation that was used to develop the pro forma condensed combined balance sheet aspurchase accounting adjustments.

(h) Adjustment reflects the conversion of June 30, 2016.weighted average shares (basic and diluted) into equivalent shares of OceanFirst common stock based on the exchange ratio in the Sun acquisition of 0.9289.

   Ocean Shore
(As Reported)
   Adjustments to
Reflect
Acquisition of
Ocean Shore
  Ocean Shores
(As Adjusted
for Acquisition
Accounting)
 
(Dollars in thousands)           

Fair Value of Assets Acquired

     

Cash, and due from financial institutions and interest-bearing bank balances

  $86,205    $(13,232 $72,973  

Securities and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

   113,506     55    113,561  

Loans receivable, net

   791,219     7,966    799,185  

Other assets

   42,744     (1,384  41,360  

Deferred tax asset

   4,140     (2,191  1,949  

Core deposit intangible

   391     7,631    8,022  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets acquired

   1,038,205     (1,155  1,037,050  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair Value of Liabilities Acquired

     

Deposits

   806,701    $975    807,676  

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

   105,000     7,447    112,447  

Other liabilities

   15,483     —      15,483  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities acquired

   927,184     8,422    935,606  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

   111,021     (9,577  101,444  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Purchase Price

   —       —      145,691  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Goodwill

   —       —     $44,247  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Note 4. Pro forma Adjustments

(a)Adjustment reflects payment of transaction expenses of $13.2 million (which includes cash payments expected to be made to certain Ocean Shore executive officers pursuant to the terms of the change in control agreements described in the section entitled “The Transactions — Interests of Ocean Shore’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Transactions — Change in Control Agreements Between Other Executive Officers and Ocean Shore” beginning on page 86) and payment of cash consideration of $26.1 million to stockholders, representing $4.35 for each share of Ocean Shore common stock held by Ocean Shore stockholders.

(b)Adjustment reflects the fair value premium on investment securities held to maturity.

(c)Adjustment reflects elimination of Ocean Shore’s historical allowance for loan losses of $3.2 million, a fair value premium due to interest rates of $14.7 million, net of deferred fees, and a fair value discount due to credit of $9.9 million.

(d)Adjustment reflects the fair value discount on premises and equipment.

(e)Adjustment reflects the tax impact of pro forma accounting fair value adjustments.

(f)Adjustment reflects the fair value of acquired core deposit intangible of $7.6 million, net of Ocean Shore’s existing core deposit intangible of $0.4 million. The core deposit intangible is calculated as the present value of the difference between a market participant’s cost of obtaining alternative funds and the cost to maintain the acquired deposit base. Deposit accounts that are evaluated as part of the core deposit intangible include demand deposit, money market and savings accounts.

(g)

Adjustment reflects the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, net of Ocean Shore’s existing goodwill balance. The purchase price is based upon $18.96 per share, the closing trading

price of OceanFirst’s common stock on August 9, 2016, which was the latest practicable trading date before the date of this document. The purchase price will not be finalized until the first-step merger is complete and will be based in part on the share price of OceanFirst on that date. See “Note 3. Purchase Price Allocation” above for more information regarding the allocation of the estimated OceanFirst purchase price.

(h)Adjustment reflects the fair value premium on time deposits which was calculated by discounting future contractual payments at a current market interest rate.

(i)Adjustment reflects the fair value premium on borrowings which was calculated by discounting future contractual payments at a current market interest rate.

(j)Adjustment reflects elimination of Ocean Shore’s historical stockholder’s equity and the issuance of stock by OceanFirst as merger consideration.

(k)In the case of Ocean Shore, interest income on loans was adjusted to reflect the difference between the contractual interest rate earned on loans and estimated premium amortization over the remaining life of the acquired loans based on current market yields for similar loans.    In the case of Cape, interest income on loans was adjusted to reflect the difference between the contractual interest rate earned on loans and estimated discount accretion over the remaining life of the acquired loans based on current market yields for similar loans.

(l)Interest income on securities was adjusted to reflect the difference between the contractual interest rate earned on securities and estimated premium amortization over the remaining life of the securities based on current market yields for similar securities.

(m)Interest expense on deposits was adjusted to reflect the amortization of the time deposit fair value premium over the remaining life of the time deposits.

(n)Interest expense on borrowings was adjusted to reflect the amortization of the estimated fair value premium over the remaining life of the borrowings.

(o)Occupancy expense was adjusted to reflect the accretion of the fair market value discount on premises and equipment.

(p)Adjustment reflects the amortization of core deposit intangible over an estimated ten year useful life and calculated on a sum of the years digits basis.

(q)Adjustment to remove the merger related expenses related to the Cape acquisition.

(r)Adjustment reflects the tax impact of the pro forma purchase accounting adjustments.

(s)In the case of Ocean Shore and Cape, adjustment reflects the conversion of weighted average shares (basic and diluted) into equivalent shares of OceanFirst common stock based on the respective merger exchange ratios.

COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDERS’ RIGHTS

The rights of stockholders of OceanFirst are currently governed by OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation, as amended, and bylaws, as amended, and by Delaware law. The rights of stockholders of Capital Bank are currently governed by Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation, as amended, and bylaws, as amended, and by the NJ Banking Act. If the first-step merger is completed, Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders will be entitled towho receive shares of OceanFirst common stock in exchange for their shares of Ocean Shore common stock. OceanFirst is organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and Ocean Shore is organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey. As a result of the integrated mergers, Ocean Shore stockholders will become stockholders of OceanFirst. Thus, following the integrated mergers, the rights of Ocean Shore stockholders who become OceanFirst stockholders and, as a result, of the integrated mergerstheir rights will be governed by the corporate law of the State of Delaware and will also then be governed by OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation and OceanFirst’s bylaws. OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporationbylaws and bylaws will be unaltered by the merger.DGCL.

The following is a summary of the material differences between (1) the current rights of Ocean Shorea Capital Bank stockholder and the rights of an OceanFirst stockholder. This summary is not a complete statement of the differences between the rights of Capital Bank stockholders underand the NJBCA, Ocean Shore’srights of OceanFirst stockholders and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Delaware and the NJ Banking Act, to the certificate of incorporation and Ocean Shore’s bylaws and (2) the current rights of OceanFirst stockholders underand the DGCL, OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation and OceanFirst’s bylaws.bylaws of Capital Bank. OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank believe that this summary describes the material differences between the rights of OceanFirst stockholders as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the rights of Ocean Shore stockholders as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus; however, it does not purport to be a complete description of those differences. Copies of OceanFirst’s and Ocean Shore’s governing documents have been filed with the SEC. To find out where copies of these documents can be obtained, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 140.[].

 

OCEANFIRST  OCEAN SHORECAPITAL BANK
AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation authorizes it to issue up to 55,000,000150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of the OceanFirst recordmost recent practicable date prior to the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus, there were 25,850,956[●] shares of OceanFirst common stock issued and outstanding and no shares of OceanFirst preferred stock outstanding.

 

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation provides further provides that the number of authorized shares of preferred stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of OceanFirst common stock, without a vote of the holders of the preferred stock, or of any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to the terms of any preferred stock designation.

  

Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s certificate of incorporation authorizes it to issue up to 25,000,00010,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01$5.00 per share. As of the Ocean Shore record date, there were 6,511,006[●] shares of Ocean Shorecommon stock issued and outstanding.

Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation further provides that authorized but unissued shares of common stock may be issued by Capital Bank’s board of directors. Pursuant to Section 17:9A:6.1 of the New Jersey Banking Act, authorized but unissued stock may, with the approval of the New Jersey Commissioner of Banking and Insurance (which we refer to as the “commissioner”), be issued for purposes, in addition to those purposes expressly authorized by law, that the Capital Bank board may determine, and for consideration as the Capital Bank board may determine.

VOTING
Generally, each holder of OceanFirst common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of OceanFirst common stock held by such stockholder. However, OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation provides that stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of the then-outstanding shares of OceanFirst commonUnder Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation, each holder of record of Capital Bank’s common stock has the right to one vote for each share of common stock held by such stockholder. The Capital Bank certificate of incorporation does not include a “voting cutback” or similar restriction. No Capital

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK
stock are not entitled to any vote with respect to shares held in excess of that 10% (which we refer to as the “10% voting restriction”). Further, OceanFirst stockholders do not have any right to cumulate votes in the election of directors.Bank stockholder is entitled to cumulate any votes for the election of directors.
MERGER VOTING
In the case of a merger or consolidation, Section 251(c) of the DGCL requires that a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote approve of the merger or consolidation. However, under Section 251(f) of the DGCL, no approval by the stockholders of the surviving corporation in a merger is required if: (i) the merger agreement does not amend the certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation; (ii) each share of the surviving corporation’s stock outstanding prior to the merger remains outstanding in identical form after the merger; and (iii) either no shares of common stock of the surviving corporation are to be issued in the merger or, if common stock will be issued, it will not increase the number of shares of common stock outstanding and no sharesprior to the merger by more than 20%.In the case of Ocean Shore preferred stock outstanding.

Ocean Shore’s certificatea merger of incorporation authorizesa New Jersey bank into a New Jersey bank or a New Jersey bank into an state bank organized under the Ocean Shore board to issue preferred stock from time to time in onelaws of another state,Section 17:9A-137 of the NJ Banking Act requires approval of the holders of at leasttwo-thirds of Capital Bank common stock. In the case of a merger of a New Jersey bank into a national bank,Section 17:9A-148 of the NJ Banking Act provides that Capital Bank, without the approval of the commissioner or more series. The Ocean Shore board is authorized to divide the preferred stock into series and to determine the designation, number, relative rights, preferences and limitations of any seriesother officer, department, board or agency of preferred stockthe State of New Jersey, may merge into or consolidate with such national bank, provided it receives the approval of the holders of at leasttwo-thirds of Capital Bank common stock. The NJ Banking Act provides further that such merger or consolidation must be effected solely in the manner and with the effect provided by amendment to the certificate of incorporation.

applicable federal law.
SIZE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OceanFirst’s bylaws currently provide that the number of directors of OceanFirst shallwill be suchthe number of directors as designated by the OceanFirst board from time to time, except, in the absence of such designation, the number shallwill be nine.

 

Under the merger agreement, OceanFirst has agreed to increase the size of the OceanFirst board from ten to thirteen members and appoint Steven E. Brady and two other current members of the Ocean Shore board toThere are currently 13 directors on the OceanFirst board.

  

Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s certificate of incorporation currently provides that except as to the number of directors constitutingthat constituted the first board of directors, the number of directors of Ocean Shore shallCapital bank must be fixed, from time to time, exclusivelyin number no less than five and no more than 25 by the Capital Bank board. The board of directors by resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of Ocean Shore’s directors; provided that a decrease inmay, between annual meetings, increase the number of directors shallby not havemore than two, and may appoint persons to fill vacancies, provided, however, that there must not at any time be more than 25 directors as authorized bySection 17:9A-101 of the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director.NJ Banking Act.

 

There are currently seven8 directors on the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board.

OCEANFIRSTOCEAN SHORE
DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Under OceanFirst’s bylaws, no director shall standperson will be eligible for re-electionelection or appointment to the OceanFirst board following his(i) if

Under Capital Bank’s bylaws, to be eligible for the Capital Bank board, a director must be (i) at least

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK

such person has, within the previous 10 years, been the subject of a supervisory action by a financial regulatory agency that resulted in a cease and desist order or her 72nd birthday.an agreement or other written statement subject to public disclosure under 12 U.S.C. § 1818(u), or any successor provision; (ii) if such person has been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty or breach of trust that is punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year under state or federal law; or (iii) if such person is currently charged in any information, indictment, or other complaint with the commission of or participation in such crime.

 

OceanFirst’s bylaws provide further provide that each director is required to maintain a residence in the State of New Jersey. Nono person may serve on the OceanFirstOceanFirst’s board and at the same time be a director or officer of anotherco-operative bank, credit union, savings bank, savings and loan association, trust company, bank holding company or banking association or any affiliate thereof.

OceanFirst’s bylaws provide further that any person who is the representative or agent or acting in concert with a person who is ineligible for election to OceanFirst’s board will also be ineligible for election or appointment to the OceanFirst board.

Furthermore, under Section 72 of the National Bank Act, every person serving as an OceanFirst Bank director must own a qualifying equity interest of $1,000 in the stock of OceanFirst Bank or OceanFirst.

  Under Ocean Shore’s bylaws, the majority

eighteen years of age, (ii) a United States citizen and (iii) a resident of either New Jersey, Pennsylvania or Delaware, except for any person who was a member of the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank board must reside withinbut not a fulltime resident of the State of New Jersey.Jersey as of April 1, 2015.

Capital Bank’s bylaws provide further that to be eligible for the Capital Bank board, a director must comply with certain qualifying share requirements. Each director must own in good faith and hold in the director’s own name unpledged shares of the capital stock of Capital Bank or a bank holding company (as such term is defined in the BHC Act) owning more than 80% of the capital stock of Capital Bank, which shares must comply with at least one of the following conditions: (1) the aggregate par value of the shares is at least $500, (2) the shares have an aggregate book value of at least $500, or (3) the shares have an aggregate fair market value of at least $500 as determined by the commissioner.

REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS
There is no provision inAt the 2018 annual meeting of OceanFirst stockholders, the stockholders of OceanFirst approved a declassification of the OceanFirst organizational documents forboard. Upon the removaleffectiveness of such declassification, directors of OceanFirst may be removed, with or without cause, by a majority vote of the OceanFirst stockholders.The NJ Banking Act provides that directors who (i) cease to own the required number of shares (as provided by both the NJ Banking Act and Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation); (ii) fail to subscribe to the oath prescribed by the OceanFirst board.Under Ocean Shore’s certificateNJ Banking Act; or (iii) default for thirty (30) days in payment of incorporation, the Ocean Shore board has the poweran undisputed obligation to Capital Bank; shall cease to be directors of Capital Bank. The Capital Bank stockholders do not have a right to remove directors for cause and to suspend directors pending a final determination that cause exists for removal. Directors may not be removed without cause.any director of Capital Bank.
SPECIAL MEETINGS OF THE STOCKHOLDERS

Under OceanFirst’s bylaws, subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred stock of OceanFirst, special meetings of OceanFirst stockholders

Under Capital Bank’s bylaws, special meetings of the stockholders may be called by Capital Bank’s president or board of directors, and must be called at

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK

may be called only by the OceanFirst board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of directors that OceanFirst would have if there were no vacancies on the board of directors.OceanFirst board.

 

OceanFirst’s bylaws provide that at any special meeting of the stockholders, only such business shallmay be conducted as shall havehas been brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the board of directors.

 

The DGCL does not grant stockholders the statutory right to call a special meeting.

  

Under Ocean Shore’s bylaws, except as otherwise requiredthe written request to the president by the NJBCA, special meetingsholder or holders of no less than 10% of all shares entitled to vote.

Pursuant to theSection 17:9A-80 of the stockholders may only be called by the president, the chairmanNJ Banking Act, upon written request of the boardany person or a majority of the board of directors. Business transacted at any special meeting is confined to the purpose or purposes stated in the notice of such meeting.

Notwithstanding the fact that Ocean Shore’s bylaws do not permit Ocean Shore stockholderspersons entitled to call a special meeting, Section 14A:5-3the secretary or cashier of Capital Bank must notify the Capital Bank stockholders of the NJBCA provides that upon the applicationcall of the holder or holders of not less than ten percent of all the shares entitled to vote at a meeting, the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey may for good cause order a special meeting to be held at such time as the notice specifies. In no event may the notice specify a time more than 60 days after the receipt of the stockholders to be called and held at certain time and place, upon such notice and for the transaction of such business as may be designated in such order.request.

QUORUM
OceanFirst’s bylaws provide that at any meeting of OceanFirst’s stockholders, subject to certain exceptions,the 10% voting restriction, the holders of a majority of all shares of the stock entitled to vote at the meeting, present in person or by proxy, constitute a quorum for all purposes except to the extent a larger number is required by law. If a quorum is not present at any meeting, the chairman of the meeting or the holders of a majority of the shares of stock entitled to vote who are present, in person or by proxy, may adjourn the meeting to another place, date or time. If notice of any adjourned special meeting of OceanFirst stockholders is sent to all stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting and states that the meeting will be held with those present, in person or by proxy, constituting a quorum, then those present, in person or by proxy, at such adjourned meeting will constitute a quorum, and all matters will be determined by a majority of the votes cast at such meeting.Under Capital Bank’s bylaws and Section 17:9A.91 of the NJ Banking Act, at any meeting of Capital Bank’s stockholders, the presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of record of the shares of capital stock of OceanFirst entitling the holders thereof to cast a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote shall be necessary to constituteat a meeting constitutes a quorum at all meetings ofthat meeting. Under Capital Bank’s bylaws, the stockholders.Ocean Shore’s bylaws provide that unless otherwise required by the NJBCA in the case of a special meeting, the holders of shares entitled to cast a majority of the votes at an annual or special meeting of stockholders shall constitute a quorum at such meeting. The stockholders present in person or by proxy at a duly organized meeting may continue to do business until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough stockholders to leave less than a quorum. Less thanIf a quorum is not present at a meeting, a majority in interest of the stockholders present, in person or by proxy, may adjourn the meeting to a meeting of the Ocean Shore stockholders.

OCEANFIRSTOCEAN SHOREfixed time.
STOCKHOLDER ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT
Under OceanFirst’s bylaws, subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred stock of OceanFirst, any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of OceanFirst must be effected at an annual or special meeting of the stockholders of OceanFirst and may not be effected by any consent in writing by such stockholders.  

Under the NJBCANJ Banking Act and Ocean Shore’s organizational documents,Capital Bank’s bylaws, any action required or permitted to be taken by theCapital Bank stockholders at a meeting may be taken without a meeting if all of the stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting consent to such action in writing.

The ability, under the NJBCA, of stockholders to act by written consent that is not unanimous is prohibited by Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation.

NOTICE OF STOCKHOLDER MEETINGS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
OceanFirst’s bylaws provide that written notice of the place, date and time of all meetings of the stockholders shallUnder Capital Bank’s bylaws, notice of Capital Bank’s annual meeting of stockholders must be

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK

must be given, not less than 10 norand no more than 60 days before the date on which the meeting is to be held to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting, except as otherwise provided by the DGCL ormeeting.

Under OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation. Whenbylaws, when a meeting is adjourned to another place, date or time, written notice need not be given of the adjourned meeting if the place, date and time thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken; provided, however,taken, except that if the date of any adjourned meeting is more than 30 days after the date for which the meeting was originally noticed, or if a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, written notice of the place, date and time of the adjourned meeting shall be given in conformity withnot less than 10 and not more than 60 days before the preceding sentence.meeting date. At any adjourned meeting, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the original meeting.

Under Section 211 of the DGCL, an annual meeting for the election of directors must be held at a date and time designated by and in the manner provided by the bylaws. The OceanFirst bylaws require the OceanFirst board of directors to fix a date within 13 months of the date of incorporation.

  Ocean Shore’s

published no less than 10 days before the annual meeting once in a newspaper published and circulated in Vineland, New Jersey. If such a newspaper does not exist, then in one published in Cumberland County, New Jersey or in an adjoining county and which has general circulation in Vineland, New Jersey.

UnderSection 17:9A-79, Capital Bank is required to have an annual meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in Capital Bank’s bylaws.

Capital Bank’s bylaws provide further that written notice of every meeting of its stockholders must include the time, place and purpose or purposes of everythe meeting of stockholders shalland must be given not less than 10 norand not more than 60 days before the date of the meeting, either personally or by mail, to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. The notice must specify the place, day and hour of the meeting and the nature of the business to be transacted.

When a meeting is adjourned to another time or place, it is not necessary to give notice of the adjourned meeting if the time and place to which the meeting is adjourned are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken and at the adjourned meeting only such business is transacted as might have been transacted at the original meeting. However, if after the adjournment the board of directors fixes a new record date for the adjournedadjourning meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shallmust be given to each stockholder of record on the new record date entitled to notice.

ADVANCE NOTICE OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
OceanFirst’s bylaws provide that, in addition to any other applicable requirements for business proposals or nominations for the election of directors to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the secretary. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered or mailed to and received at the principal executive offices of OceanFirst not less than 90 days prior to the date of the annual meeting; provided, however,meeting except that in the event that less than 100 daysdays’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, to be timely, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice

Under Capital Bank’s bylaws, matters proposed by the stockholders for the agenda for any annual meeting of the date of

Under Ocean Shore’s bylaws, in addition to any other applicable requirements for business tostockholders must be properly brought before an annual meetingmade by a stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the secretary. To be timely, a stockholder shall give notice in writing, delivered or mailed by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, to the Ocean ShoreCapital Bank’s secretary not less than sixty90 days nor more than ninety150 days prior tobefore any such meeting; provided, however, that if less than seventy-one days’ notice or prior public disclosureannual meeting of the datestockholders. Each stockholder proposal must set forth a brief description of the meeting is givenbusiness desired to stockholders, such written notice shall be delivered or mailed, as prescribed, tobrought before the Ocean Shore secretary not laterannual meeting.

Under Capital Bank’s bylaws, nominations for the election of directors may be made by the Capital

OCEANFIRST

  

OCEAN SHORE

CAPITAL BANK

on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. A stockholder’s notice to the secretary shall set forth as to

Under OceanFirst’s bylaws, for each business matter sucha stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting:meeting, that stockholder’s notice to the secretary must set forth: (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the name and address, as they appear on OceanFirst’s books, of the stockholder proposing such business, (iii) the class and number of shares of OceanFirst’s capital stock that are beneficially owned by such stockholder and (iv) any material interest of such stockholder in such business.

Under OceanFirst’s bylaws, for stockholder nominations for the election of directors, a stockholder’s notice must set forth: (i) for each director nomination, all information relating to that person that would indicate such person’s qualification under the bylaws, including an affidavit that such person would not be disqualified under the bylaws, and information that is required to be disclosed in proxy solicitations for the election of directors, or is otherwise required pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, and (ii) as to the stockholder giving notice, (x) the stockholder’s name and address, as they appear on the OceanFirst’s books, and (y) the class and number of shares of OceanFirst’s capital stock that such stockholder beneficially owns. No person nominated by a stockholder is eligible for election as an OceanFirst director unless nominated in accordance with these provisions.

Under OceanFirst’s bylaws, stockholders may not make proposals at a special meeting of OceanFirst stockholders as only OceanFirst directors are allowed to bring a proposal before a special meeting.

Alternatively, OceanFirst is subject to regulation under Rule14a-8 adopted under the Exchange Act, which provides that certain qualifying stockholders may seek to include a proposal in OceanFirst’s proxy statement and have the company solicit proxies with respect to such proposal that would be presented at a special or annual meeting. Under Rule14a-8 a company must include a shareholder proposal in its proxy materials unless the proponent fails to comply with the rule’s eligibility and procedural requirements or the proposal falls within certain substantive bases for exclusion.

  

Bank board of directors or by any Capital Bank stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors. Nominations made by eligible Capital Bank stockholders must be made by notice in writing, delivered or mailed by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, to Capital Bank’s secretary not less than 90 days prior to any stockholder meeting called for the election of a director, except that if less than 21 days’ notice of the meeting is given to Capital Bank stockholders, such written notice shall be delivered or mailed to the Capital Bank secretary not later than the close of the tenthseventh day following the day on which notice of the meeting was mailed to stockholders or such public disclosure was made. the Capital Bank stockholders.

Each such notice givenof director nominations made by a Capital Bank stockholder to the secretary with respect to business proposals to bring before a meeting shallmust set forth in writing as to(i) the name, age, business address and, if known, residence address of each matter: (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting;proposed nominee, (ii) the nameprincipal occupation or employment of each nominee, and address, as they appear on the Ocean Shore’s books, of the stockholder proposing such business; (iii) the ownership interests such stockholder has in Ocean Shore, including the class and number of shares of the Ocean Shore which areCapital Bank stock beneficially owned by sucheach nominee.

After receiving a notice of information relating to a director nomination by a stockholder, andthe Capital Bank board of directors may request any hedges, economic incentives or other ownership positions ininformation relating to a nominee that the Ocean Shore’s securities; and (iv) any material interest of the stockholder in such business.Capital Bank board deems relevant.

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK
DISSENTERS’ RIGHTS
UnderSection 262 of the DGCL a stockholder of a Delaware corporation generally has the rightpermits stockholders to dissent from a merger, or consolidation in which the corporation is participating or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation subject to specified procedural requirements. The DGCL does not conferand obtain payment of the fair value of their shares, if they follow certain statutorily defined procedures. However, appraisal rights however,do not apply if the corporation’s stock is either (a)(i) listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; or (b)(ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders. Appraisal rights may be restored if, in the transaction, stockholders are to receive, in exchange for shares of their stock, anything other than: (i) stock of the surviving corporation; (ii) stock of any corporation that is or will be listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 holders; (iii) cash in lieu of fractional shares; or (iv) any combination of (i), (ii) or (iii). The DGCL further provides that no appraisal rights shall beare available for any shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require for itsthe approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided under DGCL Section 251(f). of the DGCL.  

Generally, under Sections17:9A-140 of the NJ Banking Act, stockholders who are entitled to vote to approve a merger may dissent from a merger, if they follow certain statutorily defined procedures, and receive payment in an amount which, in the opinion of the board of directors, does not exceed the amount which would be paid upon such shares if the business and the assets of such stockholder’s shares of stock were liquidated on the day of the filing of the merger agreement.

Additionally, underSection 17:9A-360 and 361 of the NJ Banking Act, stockholders may dissent to a plan of acquisition by a corporation if they follow certain statutorily defined procedures, and receive payment in the amount of the fair value of their shares of stock as of the day before the day on which such stockholders’ were entitled to vote on such plan of acquisition.

Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraphs, the dissenters’ rights of stockholders differ with respect to certain types of business combinations, as described below.

In light ofSection 17:9A-148 of the NJ Banking Act, federal law, rather than the NJ Banking Act controls with respect to certain types of business combinations. With respect to the merger of a New Jersey bank with and into a national bank, 12 U.S.C. § 215a is the controlling provision relating to the dissenters’ rights of stockholders. With respect to a consolidation of a New Jersey bank with one or more national banks located in New Jersey, Section 215 of the National Bank Act controls. In either case a stockholder may dissent from such merger or consolidation and receive cash in the appraised value, as of the effective time merger, of the shares of common stock held by such stockholder. The NJBCA providesappraised value of the common stock may differ from the consideration that a stockholder is not entitled to demandreceive in a merger.

DIVIDENDS
Under Section 170 of the fair value of his or herDGCL and the OceanFirst bylaws, the OceanFirst board may declare and pay dividends upon shares of its capital stock either (1) out of its surplus or (2) in any transaction if the stockcase that there is listed on a national securities exchange, if cashno suchCapital Bank’s certificate of incorporation provides that the board of directors has the power to pay dividends without the approval or ratification of the stockholders.Section 17:9A-52 provides that

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK
surplus, out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is to be received, declared and/or the securities topreceding fiscal year.dividends cannot be received are listed onpaid unless the capital stock of Capital Bank will remain unimpaired and either Capital Bank will have a national securities exchange. Because Ocean Shore’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ, the holderssurplus of Ocean Shore’s common stock are not entitled to dissenters’ rights under any circumstances, regardlessat least 50% of the form of consideration to be paid for their shares.Capital Bank’s capital stock or the dividend payment will not reduce the Capital Bank’s surplus.
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

OceanFirst has not opted out of the requirements of Section 203 of the DGCL which provides thatprohibiting OceanFirst is prohibited from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder (a(defined as a person or group of affiliates owning at least fifteen percent15% of the voting power of OceanFirst) for a period of three years after suchthat interested stockholder became an interested stockholder unless (a) before the stockholderthat person became an interested stockholder, the OceanFirst board approved either the business combination or the transaction which

Ocean Shore is subject to Section 14A:10A-4 of the NJBCA, which provides that Ocean Shore is prohibited from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder (a person or group of affiliates owning, directly or indirectly, at least ten percent of the voting power of Ocean Shore) for a period of five years following the interested stockholder becoming such unless (a) the business combination is approved by the Ocean Shore board prior to the stock acquisition date or (b) the

OCEANFIRST

OCEAN SHORE

resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, (b) upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least eighty-five percent85% of the voting stock of OceanFirst outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock outstanding (but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the interested stockholder) those shares owned (i) by persons who are directors and also officers and (ii) employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer or (c)(iii) at or subsequent to the time the stockholder became an interested stockholder the business combination is approved by the OceanFirst board and authorized by the affirmative vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder at an annual or special meeting of the stockholders of OceanFirst.OceanFirst stockholders.

 

In addition, OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation provides that a business combination with an interested stockholder requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then-outstanding shares of stock of voting stock of OceanFirst.OceanFirst subject to the 10% voting restriction. The super-majority vote is not required for a business combination with an interested stockholder that is approved by a majority of disinterested directors or meets certain consideration value requirements. An interested stockholder is defined as (1) any person who beneficially owns ten percent10% or more of

There are no restrictions on business combinations with interested stockholders under Capital Bank’s bylaws, Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation or under the NJ Banking Act.

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK
the voting power of OceanFirst’s voting stock; (2) an affiliate or associate of OceanFirst who, at any time within thetwo-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of OceanFirst; or (3) an assignee of shares of voting stock which were at any time within thetwo-year period immediately prior to the date in question beneficially owned by any interested stockholder.

  

transaction which caused the person to become an interested stockholder was approved by the Ocean Shore board prior to that stockholder’s stock acquisition date and any subsequent business combination is approved by disinterested directors and the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting stock not beneficially owned by the interested stockholder at a meeting called for such purpose. Covered business combinations include certain mergers, dispositions of assets, issuances or transfers of shares and recapitalizations.

In addition, Section 14A:10A-5 provides that Ocean Shore is prohibited, at any time, from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder other than (i) a business combination approved by the board of directors prior to the stock acquisition, (ii) a business combination approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the voting stock not beneficially owned by such interested stockholder at a meeting called for such purpose or (iii) a business combination in which the interested stockholders pay a formula price designed to ensure that all other stockholders receive at least the highest price per share paid by such interested stockholder from the date the person became an interested stockholder and at least the market value per share of common stock on the date of the announcement of the business combination or the interested stockholder’s stock acquisition date less dividends.

Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation also includes similar protections for business combinations with interested stockholders.

LIMITATION OF PERSONAL LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation provides that OceanFirst’s directors shallare not be liable to OceanFirst or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability: (a) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty; (b) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (c) under Section 174 of the DGCL;DGCL, which concerns unlawful payment of a dividend or unlawful stock purchase or redemption; or (d) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation does not provide limitation of personal liability for officers.

  Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s certificate of incorporation provides that anno director or officer of Capital Bank is personally liable to Capital Bank or directorany of Ocean Shore shall have no personal liability to Ocean Shore or its stockholders for damages for breach of any duty owed to Ocean Shore or its stockholders except for liability forliabilities arising from any breach of duty based uponon an act or omission that are: (a) in breach of thea director’s or officer’s duty of loyalty, to Ocean Shore or its stockholders, (b) not in good faith or involving ain knowing violation of law or (c) resulting in receipt by such personthat director or officer of an improper personal benefit.

OCEANFIRSTOCEAN SHORE
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS AND INSURANCE

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation provides that OceanFirst shallwill indemnify and hold harmless to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any legal proceeding by reason of the fact that such person (a) is or was a director or officer of OceanFirst or (b) is or was serving at the request of OceanFirst as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan; provided, however,plan, except that OceanFirst shallwill not indemnify or agree to indemnify any of the foregoing persons against liability or expenses if he or she has not met the applicable standard for indemnification set forth in the DGCL.

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation further provides that OceanFirst may maintain insurance to protect itself and any director, officer, employee or agent of OceanFirst, any subsidiary or affiliate of OceanFirst or another corporation partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not OceanFirst would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the DGCL.

  Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s certificate of incorporation provides that Ocean Shore shallCapital Bank must indemnify to the fullest extent required or permitted by the NJBCANJ Banking Act, any person made or threatened to be made a party to any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person or such person’s testator, intestate, personal representative or spouse is or was a director or officer of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, is or was a director, officer, trustee, member, partner, incorporator or liquidator of a subsidiary of Ocean Shore,Capital Bank, or serves or served at the request of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank as a director, officer, trustee, member, partner, incorporator or liquidator of or in any other capacity for any other enterprises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except for proceedings to enforce such indemnification rights, Ocean Shore shallCapital Bank will not be obligated to provide any indemnification or any payment or reimbursement of expenses to any director, officer or other person in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person (which shallwill not

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK
other enterprise against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not OceanFirst would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the DGCL.

include counterclaims or crossclaims initiated by others) unless the Capital Bank board of directors has authorized or consented to such proceeding (or part thereof) in a resolution adoptedresolution. Under Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation, Capital Bank may indemnify every corporate agent (which includes a person who is or was a director, officer or agent of Capital Bank) as defined in, and to the fullest extent permitted by the board.NJ Banking Act, Capital Bank may indemnify a corporate agent against expenses and liabilities in connection with any proceeding involving the corporate agent by reason of his being or having been such corporate agent so long as: (a) such corporate agent acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of Capital Bank and (b) with respect to any criminal proceeding, such corporate agent had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

Section 17:9A-250 of the NJ Banking Act provides, however, that no indemnification may be provided for any claim, issue or matter in which such corporate agent has been judged liable to Capital Bank, unless and only to the extent that the Superior Court or the court in which the proceeding was brought determines that, upon application, such corporate agent is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for expenses that the Superior Court or such other court deems proper in view of all the circumstances.

Section 17:9A-250 of the NJ Banking Act further requires Capital Bank to indemnify a corporate agent against expenses to the extent such corporate agent has been successful on the merits or otherwise in any proceeding or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein.

INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS
Under DGCL Sections 219 and 220 of the DGCL, any stockholder of a Delaware corporation may examine the list of stockholders and any stockholder making a written demand may inspect any other corporate books and records for any purpose reasonably related to the stockholder’s interest as a stockholder.  Under NJBCA Capital Bank’s bylaws andSection 14A:5-28, upon the written request of any stockholder, Ocean Shore shall mail to such stockholder its balance sheet as at the end17:9A-97 of the preceding fiscal year, and its profit and loss and surplus statement for such fiscal year. Also,NJ Banking Act, any person who shall havehas been a stockholder of record of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank for at least six months immediately preceding his demand, or any person holding, or so authorized in writing by the holders of, at least five percent of the outstanding sharesstock of any class or series,Capital Bank, upon at least five days’ written demand shall havehas the right for any proper purpose to examine and take extracts from, in person or by agent or attorney, during usual business hours, itsCapital Bank’s minutes of the proceedings of its stockholders

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK

and record of stockholders and to make extracts therefrom at the placesplace where the samesuch minutes are kept.

Section 17:9A-97 of the NJ Banking Act provides further that a stockholder whose demand has been refused by a bank may apply to the commissioner for an order directing the bank to permit such examination or the making of such extracts. If the commissioner is satisfied that the purpose for which the stockholder’s application has been made is (a) made in good faith and (b) proper, then the commissioner must mail a copy of the demand to the bank together with an order directing the bank to show cause why the demand should not be allowed within five days of such demand. The order to show cause must be returned to the commissioner no less than five and no more than 10 days after issued. The commissioner will have a hearing on the date the order is returned and, within five days thereof, make an order allowing or denying the demand. Any order, other than the show cause order, is subject to review, hearing and relief in the Superior Court.

AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLESCERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS

Under OceanFirst’s bylaws, the OceanFirst board may amend, alter or repeal the bylaws at any meeting of the

Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation further provides that the Ocean Shore board is expressly

OCEANFIRST

OCEAN SHORE

OceanFirst board, provided notice of the proposed change was given not less than two days prior to the meeting. The OceanFirst stockholders shall also have the power to amend, alter or repeal the bylaws at any meeting of OceanFirst stockholders provided notice of the proposed change was given in the notice of the meeting; provided, however,meeting except that, notwithstanding any other provisions of OceanFirst’s bylaws or any provision of law which might otherwise permit a lesser vote or no vote, but in addition to any affirmative vote of the holders of any particular class or series of OceanFirst common stock required by law, OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation, any preferred stock designation or the bylaws, the affirmative votes of the holders of at least eighty percent80% of the voting power of all the then-outstanding shares of OceanFirst capital stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal any provisions of the bylaws.

 

OceanFirst may amend or repeal any provision in the OceanFirst certificate of incorporation in the manner set forth in the DGCL; provided, however,DGCL, except that notwithstanding any other provision of law which might otherwise permit a

Under Capital Bank’s bylaws, Capital Bank stockholders may only make, alter or repeal bylaws at an annual or special meeting by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the capital stock of Capital Bank entitled to vote at such meeting. Bylaws may not be made, altered or repealed by the Capital Bank board except by the affirmative vote of a majority of the whole board at any regular or special meeting of the Capital Bank board, and unless at least two days’ prior written notice of the intended action has been given to the directors. Such notice may be waived by a director at or prior to the meeting. Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation subjects the board’s power to make, alter or repeal the bylaws to the right to alteration or repeal by the Capital Bank stockholders at any meeting and any limitations as may from time to time be imposed by law.

Under Capital Bank’s certificate of incorporation, Capital Bank may amend, alter, change or repeal any provision of its certificate of incorporation in any manner prescribed by law, except that no amendment or repeal of its certificate of incorporation may eliminate or reduce the limitations on liability

OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK
lesser vote or no vote, OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least eighty percent80% of the voting power of all the outstanding shares of OceanFirst’s capital stock, subject to the 10% voting restriction, to amend or repeal certain provisions of the certificate of incorporation, including, but not limited to, provisions relating to the ten percent10% limitation on voting rights, the prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, the calling of special meetings, amendment of the bylaws, classification of the board, board vacancies, removal of directors, advance notice requirements for stockholder nominations, stockholder voting requirements for business combinations involving interested stockholders, indemnification of officers and directors, and the provision requiring at least eighty percent80% of outstanding voting stock approval to amend the aforementioned provisions.

  

authorizedafforded by the certificate of incorporation to make, repeal, alter, amend and rescind Ocean Shore’sdirectors or officers in respect of any matter which occurred, or any cause of action suit or claim which would have accrued or arisen before such amendment or repeal.

FORUM SELECTION BYLAW

OceanFirst’s bylaws by a voteprovide that unless OceanFirst consents in writing to the selection of two-thirdsan alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the full boardState of directors present atDelaware shall be, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of OceanFirst, (ii) any action asserting a legal meeting held in accordance with the provisionsclaim of Ocean Shore’s bylaws. Notwithstandingbreach of a fiduciary duty owed by any otherdirector, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of OceanFirst to OceanFirst or OceanFirst stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against OceanFirst or any director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of OceanFirst arising out of or relating to any provision of Ocean Shore’sthe DGCL or the OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws (and notwithstanding the fact that some lesser percentage may be specified by law), Ocean Shore’s bylaws shall not be made, repealed, altered, amended or rescinded(iv) any action asserting a claim against OceanFirst or any director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of OceanFirst governed by the stockholders of Ocean Shore except by the voteinternal affairs doctrine of the holdersState of not less than eighty percent of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of Ocean ShoreDelaware.

OceanFirst’s bylaws also provide that OceanFirst is entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (considered for this purpose as one class) cast atequitable relief, including injunctive relief and specific performance, to enforce such provisions regarding forum.

Capital Bank’s organizational documents do not contain a meeting of the stockholders called for that purpose (provided that notice of such proposed adoption, repeal, alteration, amendment or rescission is included in the notice of such meeting), or, as set forth above, by the Ocean Shore board.

Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation provides that except as otherwise required by the NJBCA, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote shall be required to approve the amendment of the certificate of incorporation, except that (a) the affirmative vote of at least eighty percent of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote (considered for this purpose as one class) shall be required to amend certain sections of Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation, including provisions relating to limitation on voting rights, the classified board, certain duties of directors and Articles related to certain stockholder vote requirements, elimination of director and officer liability, indemnification and the amendment of Ocean Shore’s bylaws, and (b) the Ocean Shore board, without any action by the Ocean Shore stockholders, may amend Ocean Shore’s certificate of incorporation to the fullest extent allowed under the NJBCA.

forum selection clause.

COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS

OceanFirst common stock is listed on the NASDAQ under the symbol “OCFC” and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock is listedtraded on the NASDAQOTC Pink under the symbol “OSHC.”“CANJ” and in private transactions. The following table sets forth (i) the high and low reported sale prices per share of OceanFirst common stock and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock, (ii) the sale prices per share of Capital Bank common stock in any private transactions of which Capital Bank was aware and (iii) the cash dividends declared per share for the periods indicated.

 

��  OceanFirst Common Stock   Ocean Shore Common Stock 
  High   Low   Dividend   High   Low   Dividend   OceanFirst Common Stock   Capital Bank Common Stock 

2014

            
  High   Low   Dividend   High   Low   Dividend 
2016            

First Quarter

  $19.47    $16.81    $0.12    $14.51    $13.30    $0.06    $19.99   $15.98   $0.13   $ (1)    $ (1)    $0.15(2)  

Second Quarter

   18.64     15.34     0.12     15.00     14.05     0.06     19.65    16.77    0.13    16.00    16.00    —   

Third Quarter

   17.16     13.94     0.13     14.90     14.05     0.06     19.96    17.99    0.15    16.00    16.00    —   

Fourth Quarter

   17.76     15.25     0.13     14.58     13.70     0.06     30.49    18.99    0.15    17.00    16.00    —   

2015

            
2017            

First Quarter

   17.51     16.01     0.13     14.85     13.80     0.06     30.70    27.04    0.15    17.00    17.00    0.175(3)  

Second Quarter

   18.88     16.65     0.13     15.72     14.59     0.06     29.00    25.45    0.15    17.25    17.25    0.175(4)  

Third Quarter

   19.13     16.51     0.13     16.17     14.54     0.06     27.78    24.02    0.15    19.00    17.35    —   

Fourth Quarter

   21.00     16.74     0.13     17.60     15.74     0.06     29.46    25.31    0.15    20.00    18.50    —   

2016

            
2018            

First Quarter

   19.99     15.98     0.13     18.06     16.53     0.06     28.50    25.00    0.15    21.25    20.00    0.20(5)  

Second Quarter

   19.65     16.77     0.13     17.99     16.60     0.06     30.90    25.94    0.15    24.00    21.00    —   

Third Quarter

   19.95     18.12     0.13     23.15     16.83     0.06     30.89    26.96    0.17    24.50    23.10    0.20(6)  

(1)

Capital Bank is not aware of any sales during the first quarter of 2016.

(2)

Prior to 2018, Capital Bank only paid annual dividends. This amount represents the 2016 annual dividend paid to Capital Bank stockholders on April 22, 2016.

(3)

This amount represents the 2017 annual dividend paid to Capital Bank stockholders on April 21, 2017.

(4)

This amount represents the special 10th anniversary dividend of $0.175 per share paid to Capital Bank stockholders on August 31, 2017.

(5)

As of 2018, Capital Bank pays semi-annual dividends. This dividend represented the semi-annual dividend for the third and fourth quarters of 2017, which was paid to Capital Bank stockholders on March 9, 2018.

(6)

This amount represents the semi-annual dividend for the first and second quarters of 2018, which was paid to Capital Bank stockholders on October 19, 2018.

On July 12, 2016,October 25, 2018, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the Transactions,merger, the high and low sales prices of shares of OceanFirst common stock as reported on the NASDAQ were $18.88$25.11 and $18.59,$24.31, respectively. On October 14, 2016,[●], 2018, the last practicable trading day prior to the printing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the high and low sales prices of shares of OceanFirst common stock as reported on the NASDAQ were $19.29$[●] and $19.10,$[●], respectively.

On July 12, 2016,October 25, 2018, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the Transactions,merger, the high and low sales prices of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock as reported on the NASDAQOTC Pink were $17.03 and $16.95, respectively.both $24.65. On October 14, 2016,[●], 2018, the last practicable trading day prior to printing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the high and low sales prices of shares of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock as reportedquoted on the NASDAQOTC Pink were $22.74$[●] and $22.41,$[●], respectively.

As of [●], 2018, the last date prior to printing this proxy statement/prospectus for which it was practicable to obtain this information for OceanFirst record date,and Capital Bank, respectively, there were approximately 1,679[●] registered holders of OceanFirst common stock and as of the Ocean Shore record date, there were approximately 528[●] registered holders of Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock.

Each of the OceanFirst stockholders and the Ocean Shore

Capital Bank stockholders are advised to obtain current market quotations for OceanFirst common stock and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock. The market price of OceanFirst common stock and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock will fluctuate between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the date of the special meeting and the date of completion of the Transactions.merger. No assurance can be given concerning the market price of OceanFirst common stock or Ocean ShoreCapital Bank common stock before or after the effective date of the first-step merger. Changes in the market price of OceanFirst common stock prior to the completion of the Transactionsmerger will affect the market value of the stock portion of the merger consideration that Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders will be entitled to receive upon completion of the Transactions.

merger.

Dividends

OceanFirst currently pays a quarterly cash dividend of $0.17 per share, which is expected to continue, although the OceanFirst board may change this dividend policy at any time. OceanFirst stockholders will be entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the OceanFirst board out of funds legally available for dividends. The OceanFirst board will consider OceanFirst’s financial condition and level of net income, future prospects, economic condition, industry practices and other factors, including applicable banking laws and regulations, in determining whether to pay dividends in the future and the amount of such dividends.

Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Capital Bank may declare and pay a cash dividend of $0.22 per share in respect of the second half of the 2018 calendar year prior to the effective time. The Capital Bank board may change Capital Bank’s dividend policy at any time, subject to certain restrictions in the merger agreement.

For more information regarding OceanFirst’s and Capital Bank’s dividend policies, see the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “The Merger — Dividend Policy” beginning on page [●].

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND

MANAGEMENT OF OCEANFIRSTCAPITAL BANK

The following table provides information as of September 27, 2016 with respect toNovember 30, 2018 about the persons known by OceanFirstto Capital Bank to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding stock. A person is considered to beneficially own any shares of common stock over which he or she has, directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investment power.

Name and Address Of Beneficial OwnerNumber of Shares OwnedPercent of Common
Stock Outstanding(1)

OceanFirst Bank,

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “OceanFirst ESOP”)

975 Hooper Avenue

Toms River, New Jersey 08754-2009

1,583,869(2)6.1

EJF Capital LLC

2107 Wilson Boulevard

Suite 410

Arlington, VA 22201

1,519,119(3)5.9

Wellington Management Company, LLP

280 Congress Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

1,350,095(4)5.2

(1)Percentages with respect to each person have been calculated on the basis of 25,839,744 shares of OceanFirst common stock, the number of shares of OceanFirst common stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of August 4, 2016.
(2)Under the terms of the OceanFirst ESOP, the trustee will vote all shares held in the OceanFirst ESOP in accordance with the instructions of the participants.
(3)Based on SEC Schedule 13G filed on September 27, 2016.
(4)Based on SEC Schedule 13G Amendment No. 6 filed on February 11, 2016.

The following table provides information as of September 27, 2016, about the shares of OceanFirst common stock that may be considered to be beneficially owned by (i) each director and each named executive officer of OceanFirst as of such date and (ii) all OceanFirst directors and executive officers as a group. This information has been provided by each of the directors and executive officers at OceanFirst’s request or derived from statements filed with the SEC. Beneficial ownership of securities means the possession directly or indirectly, through any formal or informal arrangement, either individually or in a group, of voting or investment power (which includes the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, such security). Unless otherwise indicated, to OceanFirst’s knowledge, the beneficial owner has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares.

Name  Number of Shares
Owned (excluding
options)(2)
   Number of Shares
That May Be
Acquired Within 60
Days by Exercising
Options
   Total Number of
Shares Beneficially
Owned
   Percent of Common
Stock Outstanding(3)
 

Directors(1)

        

Joseph J. Burke(4)

   19,038     18,686     37,724     *  

Angelo Catania(4)

   21,017     18,686     39,703     *  

Michael D. Devlin

   195,776     173,419     369,195     1.4

Jack M. Farris(5)

   3,440     —      3,440     *  

John R. Garbarino(5)(6)

   399,622     455,843     855,465     3.3

Christopher D. Maher(7)(8)

   36,061     47,886     83,947     *  

Donald E. McLaughlin(4)(9)

   42,145     18,686     60,831     *  

Diane F. Rhine(4)

   41,397     18,686     60,083     *  

Mark G. Solow(4)

   17,864     4,900     22,764     *  

John E. Walsh(4)

   26,354     18,686     45,040     *  

Named Executive Officers who are not also Directors

        

Michael J. Fitzpatrick(8)(10)

   190,962     152,283     343,245     1.3

Joseph J. Lebel, III(8)(11)

   31,278     76,738     108,016     *  

Joseph R. Iantosca(8)(11)

   39,668     76,076     115,744     *  

Steven J. Tsimbinos(8)(12)

   23,214     42,600     65,814     *  

All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

   1,097,243     1,125,425     2,222,668     8.2

*Less than 1%.
(1)Each director and executive officer maintains a mailing address at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753. None of the above directors or executive officers have pledged any shares of OceanFirst.
(2)Each person effectively exercises sole (or shared with spouse or other immediate family members) voting power as to shares reported as of September 27, 2016.
(3)Percentages with respect to each person or group of persons have been calculated on the basis of 25,850,956 shares of OceanFirst common stock, the number of shares of OceanFirst common stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of September 27, 2016, plus the number of shares of OceanFirst common stock which such person or group of persons has the right to acquire within 60 days of September 27, 2016 by the exercise of stock options.
(4)Includes 4,765 unvested shares. Each non-employee director, other than Messrs. Farris, Garbarino and Devlin, was awarded 681 restricted shares in February 2012, 713 restricted shares in February 2013, 1,880 restricted shares in March 2014, 1,850 restricted shares in March 2015 and 1,740 restricted shares in March 2016. Each such award vests at a rate of 20% per year commencing on March 1 of the year following the grant.
(5)Includes 3,220 unvested shares. Messrs. Farris and Garbarino were awarded 1,850 restricted shares in March 2015 and 1,740 restricted shares in March 2016. Each such award vests at a rate of 20% per year commencing on March 1 of the year following the grant.
(6)Includes 105,057 shares held by a trust for which Mr. Garbarino serves as trustee, 14,445 shares owned by Mr. Garbarino’s wife, and 9,584 shares held by Mr. Garbarino and his wife as co-trustees.
(7)Includes 11,016 unvested shares. Mr. Maher was awarded 4,566 restricted shares in June 2013, 5,165 in March 2015 and 5,060 in March 2016. Such awards vest at a rate of 20% per year commencing on March 1 of the year following the grant.
(8)Includes the following shares that have been allocated and are held in trust pursuant to the OceanFirst ESOP as of September 27, 2016: Mr. Maher: 1,001; Mr. Fitzpatrick: 78,294; Mr. Lebel: 7,189; Mr. Iantosca: 11,536; and Mr. Tsimbinos 1,984. Such persons have sole voting power, but no investment power, except in limited circumstances, as to such shares.
(9)Includes 5,321 shares owned by Mr. McLaughlin’s wife.
(10)Includes 4,434 unvested shares. Mr. Fitzpatrick was awarded 1,946 restricted shares in February 2012, 1,529 restricted shares in February 2013, 1,760 restricted shares in March 2014, 1,540 restricted shares in March 2015, and 1,145 restricted shares in March 2016. Each such award vests at a rate of 20% per year commencing on March 1 of the year following the grant.
(11)Includes 5,436 unvested shares for each of Mr. Lebel and Mr. Iantosca. Each of Mr. Lebel and Mr. Iantosca was awarded 657 restricted shares in February 2012, 764 restricted shares in February 2013, 761 shares in June 2013, 1,910 restricted shares in March 2014, 2,055 restricted shares in March 2015, and 1,910 restricted shares in March 2016. Each such award vests at a rate of 20% per year commencing on March 1 of the year following the grant.
(12)Includes 12,457 unvested shares. Mr. Tsimbinos was awarded 657 restricted shares in February 2012, 764 restricted shares in February 2013, 1,030 restricted shares in March 2014, 7,575 restricted shares in March 2015, and 5,345 restricted shares in March 2016. Each such award vests at a rate of 20% per year commencing on March 1 of the year following the grant.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND

MANAGEMENT OF OCEAN SHORE

The following table provides information as of September 23, 2016 about the persons known to Ocean Shore to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of Ocean Shore’sCapital Bank’s outstanding common stock. A person may be considered to beneficially own any shares of common stock over which he, she or it has, directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investing power.

 

Name and Address

Number of Shares OwnedPercent of Common Stock
Outstanding

Bay Pond Partners, L.P.

c/o Wellington Management Company LLP

280 Congress Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

357,200(1)5.6

Chicago Capital Management, LLC

Steven R. Gerbel

311 South Wacker Drive

Suite 6025

Chicago, Illinois 60606

330,116(2)5.1

M3 Funds, LLC

M3 Partners, LP

M3F, Inc.

Jason A. Stock

William C. Waller

10 Exchange Place, Suite 510

Salt Lake City, Utah 84111

433,609(3)6.8

Rangeley Capital, LLC

Rangeley Capital Partners, LP

Christopher DeMuth, Jr.

3 Forest Street

New Canaan, Connecticut 06840

582,562(4)9.1

Ocean Shore Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan

1001 Asbury Avenue

Ocean City, New Jersey 08226

553,334(5)8.6

Name

  

Current Title

  Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership (1)
   Percentage of
Shares of
Common Stock
Outstanding on
Record Date
 

John J. DiDonato (2)

  Director   53,192    2.1

James R. Haefele

  Director   625    * 

David J. Hanrahan, Sr. (3)

  President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director   79,400    3.2

Harry E. Hearing (4)

  Director   19,750    * 

Daniel R. Kuhar (5)

  Director   18,125    * 

Thomas J. Lobosco (6)

  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer  ��34,000    1.3

Salvatore A. Pipitone

  Director   52,625    2.1

Joseph F. Rehm (7)

  Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer   18,100    * 

Kathie L. Renner

  Director and Secretary   625    * 

Dominic J. Romano (8)

  Chairman of the Board   100,300    3.9

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (10 persons) (9)

  —     376,742    14.7

 

(1)*Based on information contained in Schedule 13G filed with

Represents less than 1% of the SEC on August 1, 2016.outstanding common stock.

(2)(1)Based on information contained in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on August 9, 2016.
(3)Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 29, 2016. Includes 703

The number of shares beneficially owned by William C. Waller overthe individuals listed in the table is determined in accordance with the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and is based on the information supplied to us by such individuals. Therefore, it may not be conclusive as to ownership of those securities for any other purpose. Under those rules, an individual (or entity) is deemed to beneficially own shares of common stock as to which hethe individual currently has certain sole or shared powers or as to which the individual can acquire such powers within 60 days by the exercise of any option, warrant or other right. We have been advised that each stockholder listed in the table has sole voting and dispositive power.power with respect to such shares unless otherwise noted in the footnotes below.

(4)(2)Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed

Includes 32,897 shares that Mr. DiDonato holds jointly with the SEC on February 1, 2016.his spouse, and 10,885 shares owned by his spouse.

(5)(3)Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed

Includes 22,500 shares he holds pursuant to an unvested restricted stock award with the SEC on February 8, 2016.

The following table provides information as of September 23, 2016 about the shares of Ocean Shore common stock that may be considered to be beneficially owned by each director, each executive officer named therein and all directors and executive officers of Ocean Shore as a group. A person may be considered to beneficially own any shares of common stock over which he, she or it has, directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investment power. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the named individuals has solefull voting power, and sole investment power with respect to the number of shares shown.

Name(1)

  Common Stock(2)  Options
Exercisable Within
60 Days
   Total   Percent of
Common Stock
Outstanding
 

Directors

       

Steven E. Brady

   145,582(3)   61,456     207,038     3.2

Frederick G. Dalzell, MD

   65,260(4)   13,600     78,860     1.2

John L. Van Duyne, Jr.

   45,558(5)   13,600     59,158     *  

Christopher J. Ford

   40,665    13,600     54,265     *  

Dorothy F. McCrosson

   7,944    7,100     15,044     *  

Robert A. Previti, Ed.D

   45,542(6)   13,600     59,142     *  

Samuel R. Young

   27,053    13,600     40,653     *  

Named Executive Officers Who Are Not Also Directors

       

Janet M. Bossi

   52,886(7)   4,600     57,486     *  

Kim M. Davidson

   54,703(8)   10,455     65,158     1.0

Donald F. Morgenweck

   51,583    10,291     61,874     1.0

Anthony J. Rizzotte

   47,429(9)   2,233     49,662     *  

All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)

   609,013    165,335     774,348     11.7

(1)Each director and executive officer maintains a mailing address at 1001 Asbury Avenue Ocean City, New Jersey 08226. Other than as set forth below, none of the above directors or executive officers have pledged any shares of Ocean Shore.
(2)This column includes the following:

   Shares Held in
Trust and
Awarded under
Ocean Shore’s
Equity Incentive
Plan
   Shares Held in
Trust Pursuant to
Ocean Shore’s
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
   Shares Held in
Trust and
Allocated Under
Ocean Shore
ESOP and ESOP
SERP
   Shares Held in
Trust and
Credited Under
the Ocean Shore
401(k) Plan
 

Mr. Brady

   6,000     3,393     23,732     34,284  

Dr. Dalzell

   —       7,944     —       —    

Mr. Van Duyne, Jr.

   —       17,535     —       —    

Mr. Ford

   —       4,162     —       —    

Ms. McCrosson

   —       —       —       —    

Dr. Previti

   —       7,703     —       —    

Mr. Young

   —       3,019     —       —    

Ms. Bossi

   4,500     1,202     8,121     21,920  

Ms. Davidson

   4,500     1,323     8,786     23,083  

Mr. Morgenweck

   3,900     1,440     8,845     9,167  

Mr. Rizzotte

   4,500     2,595     12,003     23,604  

(3)Includes 78,17336,900 shares pledged as security.

(4)

Includes 3,4299,750 shares jointly held by Dr. Dalzell’s spouse and 23,189 shares held by a limited liability company in which Dr. Dalzell has sole voting power. Also, includes 18,904 shares pledged as security.Mr. Hearing with his spouse.

(5)

Includes 28,0233,750 shares pledged as security.that Mr. Kuhar has the right to acquire through the exercise of vested stock options.

(6)

Includes 876,000 shares held by Dr. Previti’s son. Also, includes 18,904that Mr. Lobosco has the right to acquire through the exercise of vested stock options, 5,000 shares pledged as security.that he holds jointly with his spouse and 6,700 shares he holds pursuant to an unvested restricted stock award with full voting power.

(7)

Includes 16,0772,750 shares pledged as security.that Mr. Rehm has the right to acquire through the exercise of vested stock options and 11,000 shares he holds pursuant to an unvested restricted stock award with full voting power.

(8)

Includes 12,000 shares that Mr. Romano holds jointly with his spouse, 14,250 shares owned by his spouse, 8,250 shares that he has the right to acquire through the exercise of vested stock options, and 12,000 shares he holds pursuant to a restricted stock award with full voting power.

(8)(9)

Includes 17,01132,275 shares pledged as security.that the directors and executive officers have the right to acquire through the exercise of vested stock options, and 52,200 shares held pursuant to restricted stock awards with full voting power.

(9)Includes 922 shares pledged as security.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the OceanFirst common stock to be issued in connection with the first-step merger will be passed upon for OceanFirst by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (New York, New York). Certain U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the integrated mergersmerger will be passed upon for OceanFirst by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (New York, New York) and for Ocean ShoreCapital Bank by Kilpatrick TownsendStevens & Stockton LLP (Washington, D.C.)Lee (Lawrenceville, New Jersey).

EXPERTS

OceanFirst

The consolidated financial statements of OceanFirst as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015,2017, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2017, have been incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

Ocean ShoreSun

The consolidated financial statements of Ocean Shore incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference from Ocean Shore’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSun Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the yearthree years ended December 31, 2015, and the effectiveness of Ocean Shore’s internal control over financial reporting2017, included in this proxy statement/prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,auditors, as stated in their reports, whichreport appearing herein, and are incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial statements have been so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

Cape

The consolidated financial statements of Cape as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and the effectiveness of Cape’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 have been audited by Crowe Horwath LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in the report of Crowe Horwath LLP appearing in Cape’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference. Such consolidated financial statements have been so incorporatedincluded in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

DEADLINES FOR SUBMITTING STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

OceanFirst

OceanFirst held its 2016 annual meeting of stockholders on June 2, 2016 and began mailing its proxy statement for such meeting on or about April 26, 2016.

To be considered for inclusion in the OceanFirst sponsored proxy materials for OceanFirst’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, proposals by OceanFirst stockholders must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. In order to comply with Rule 14a-8, among other requirements, any such proposal must be received in writing by OceanFirst’s Corporate Secretary at 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753 no later than December 27, 2016. If OceanFirst’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders is held on a date more than 30 calendar days from June 2, 2017, a stockholder proposal must be received by a reasonable time before OceanFirst begins to print and mail its proxy solicitation material for such meeting. Any stockholder proposals will be subject to the requirements of the proxy rules adopted by the SEC.

OceanFirst stockholders may also make proposals and director nominations that are not intended to be included in OceanFirst’s proxy statement for its 2017 annual meeting of OceanFirst stockholders, so long as the proposals or nominations comply with OceanFirst’s bylaws. Based on the requirements set forth in OceanFirst’s bylaws, in order to make proposals for business to be brought before OceanFirst’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders or nominations for the election of directors at such meeting, any OceanFirst stockholder must deliver notice of such proposal or nomination to OceanFirst’s Corporate Secretary no later 90 days before the date of such meeting; provided that if less than 100 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting is given to OceanFirst stockholders, such notice must be delivered not later than the close of the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of such annual meeting was mailed to stockholders or prior public disclosure of the meeting date was made.

Ocean Shore

Ocean Shore held its 2016 annual meeting of stockholders on May 25, 2016 and began mailing its proxy statement for such meeting on or about April 19, 2016. Ocean Shore will not hold a 2017 annual meeting of Ocean Shore stockholders if the first-step merger is completed. However, if the first-step merger is not completed for any reason, Ocean Shore will hold an annual meeting of its stockholders in 2017.

To be considered for inclusion in the Ocean Shore sponsored proxy materials for Ocean Shore’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, proposals by Ocean Shore stockholders must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. In order to comply with Rule 14a-8, among other requirements, any such proposal must be received in writing by Ocean Shore’s Corporate Secretary at 1001 Asbury Avenue, Ocean City, New Jersey 08226 no later than December 20, 2016. If Ocean Shore’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders is held on a date more than 30 calendar days from May 25, 2017, a stockholder proposal must be received by a reasonable time before Ocean Shore begins to print and mail its proxy solicitation materials for such meeting. Any stockholder proposals will be subject to the requirements of the proxy rules adopted by the SEC.

Ocean Shore stockholders may also make proposals and director nominations that are not intended to be included in the Ocean Shore sponsored proxy materials for its 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, if held, so long as the proposals and nominations comply with Ocean Shore’s bylaws. In order to comply with Ocean Shore’s bylaws, among other requirements, any Ocean Shore stockholder proposals or nominations must be delivered to the Secretary of Ocean Shore not less than 60 calendar days prior to the date of such meeting and not more than 90 calendar days prior to the date of such meeting. If less than 71 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the 2017 annual meeting of Ocean Shore stockholders is given to the Ocean Shore stockholders, then, in order to comply with Ocean Shore’s bylaws, among other requirements, any Ocean Shore stockholder proposals or nominations must be delivered to Ocean Shore not later than the close of the tenth day following such notice or public disclosure.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

OceanFirst is filing with the SEC this registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to register the issuance of the shares of OceanFirst common stock to be issued in connection with the first-step merger. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part of that registration statement and constitutes the prospectus of OceanFirst in addition to being a proxy statement for OceanFirst stockholders and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank stockholders. The registration statement, including this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the attached annexes and exhibits, contains additional relevant information about OceanFirst, including information about OceanFirst’s common stock.

OceanFirst and Ocean Shore also filefiles reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC under the Exchange Act. You may read and copy this information at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates, or from commercial document retrieval services.

The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers, such as OceanFirst, and Ocean Shore, who file electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is http://www.sec.gov. The reports, proxy statements and other information filed by OceanFirst with the SEC are also available at OceanFirst’s website at www.oceanfirstonline.com under the tab “Investor Relations,” and then under the heading “SEC Filings”. The reports, proxy statements and other information filed by Ocean Shore with the SEC are available at Ocean Shore’s website at www.ochome.com/home under the tab “Investor Relations,” and then under the heading “SEC Filings”. The web addresses of the SEC OceanFirst and Ocean ShoreOceanFirst are included as inactive textual references only. Except as specifically incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, information on those web sites is not part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

The SEC allows OceanFirst and Ocean Shore to incorporate by reference information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This means that OceanFirst and Ocean Shore can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, except for any information that is superseded by information that is included directly in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference the documents listed below that OceanFirst and Ocean Shorehas previously filed with the SEC. They contain important information about the companies and their financial condition.

 

OceanFirst SEC Filings

(SEC File No. 001-11713)

 Period or Date Filed

Annual Report on Form10-K

 Year ended December 31, 20152017 filed on February 28, 2018

Annual Report on Form11-K

 Filed on June 24, 201625, 2018

Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q

 Quarters ended March 31, 2016 and2018, June 30, 20162018 and September 30, 2018

Current Reports on Form8-K

 Filed on January 6, 2016,12, 2018, January 26, 2018, February 1, 2018, February 5, 2018, February 26, 2018, February 27, 2018, March 29, 2018, April 27, 2018, May 8, 2016, January 22, 2016, February 18, 2016, March 28, 2016, April 22, 2016, April2018, June 4, 2018, July 27, 2018, October 25, 2018, October 26, 2016, May 2, 2016, May 18, 2016, May 20, 2016, June2018, October 26, 2018, November 29, 2018 and December 3, 2016, June 21, 2016, June 23, 2016, July 13, 2016, July 14, 2016, July 15, 2016, July 29, 2016, August 1, 2016, August 2, 2016 and September 21, 20162018 (other than those portions of the documents deemed to be furnished and not filed)

OceanFirst SEC Filings

(SEC File No. 001-11713)

Period or Date Filed

Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

 Filed April 26, 20162018
The description of OceanFirst common stock set forth in its registration statement on Form8-A, as amended, filed on May 8, 1996, including any amendment or report filed with the SEC for the purpose of updating this description.

Ocean Shore SEC Filings

(SEC File No. 0- 53856)

Period or Date Filed

Annual Report on Form 10-K

Year ended December 31, 2015

Annual Report on Form 11-K

Filed on June 16, 2016

Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q

Quarters ended March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016

Current Reports on Form 8-K

Filed on January 26, 2016, April 26, 2016, May 27, 2016, July 13, 2016, July 14, 2016 and July 26, 2016 (other than those portions of the documents deemed to be furnished and not filed)

Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

Filed on April 19, 2016
The description of Ocean Shore common stock set forth in the Ocean Shore’s Form 8-K12G3, as filed with the SEC on December 21, 2009, including any amendment or report filed with the SEC for the purpose of updating this description. 

The historical audited consolidated financial statements of Cape (SEC File No. 001-33934)Sun as of December 31, 20152017 and 20142016 and for the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20152017 and the related notes thereto are also incorporated by referenceincluded elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus from Cape’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The historical unaudited consolidated financial statements of Cape as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and the related notes thereto are also incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus from Cape’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. These reports of Cape are is available at http://www.SEC.gov.prospectus.

In addition, OceanFirst and Ocean Shore also incorporateincorporates by reference additional documents filed with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act between the date of this joint proxy statement/

prospectus and in the case of OceanFirst, the date of the OceanFirst special meeting, and, in the case of Ocean Shore, the date of the Ocean Shore special meeting, provided that OceanFirst and Ocean Shore areis not incorporating by reference any information furnished to, but not filed with, the SEC.

Except where the context otherwise indicates, OceanFirst has supplied all information contained or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to OceanFirst, and Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has supplied all information contained herein or incorporated by reference relating to Ocean Shore.Capital Bank.

Documents incorporated by reference are available from OceanFirst and Ocean Shore without charge, excluding any exhibits to those documents unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference as an exhibit in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You can obtain documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the appropriate companyOceanFirst at the following address and phone number:

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

975 Hooper Avenue

Toms River, New Jersey 08753

Attention: Investor Relations

Telephone: (732) 240-4500

Ocean Shore Holding Co.

1001 Asbury Avenue

Ocean City, New Jersey 08226

Attention: Investor Relations

Telephone: (609) 399-0012

OceanFirst stockholders and Ocean ShoreFinancial Corp.

110 West Front Street

Red Bank, New Jersey 07701

Attention: Investor Relations

Telephone: (732)240-4500

Capital Bank stockholders requesting documents must do so by November 15, 2016[], 2019 to receive them before their respectivethe special meetings.meeting. You will not be charged for any of these documents that you request. If you request any incorporated documents from OceanFirst, or Ocean Shore, then OceanFirst and Ocean Shore, respectively, will mail them to you by first class mail, or another equally prompt means, within one business day after receiving your request.

Neither OceanFirst nor Ocean ShoreCapital Bank has authorized anyone to give any information or make any representation about the Transactionsmerger or the companies that is different from, or in addition to, that contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or in any of the materials that have been incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Therefore, if anyone does give you information of this sort, you should not rely on it. If you are in a jurisdiction where offers to exchange or sell, or solicitations of offers to exchange or purchase, the securities offered by this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the solicitation of proxies is unlawful, or if you are a person to whom it is unlawful to direct these types of activities, then the offer presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus does not extend to you. The information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus speaks only as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus unless the information specifically indicates that another date applies.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Sun Bancorp, Inc. Financial Statements as of December  31, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

F-2

SUN BANCORP, INC.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31,

2017 AND 2016 AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016 AND 2015

SUN BANCORP, INC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

F-4

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 OF AND FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016 AND 2015:

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Operations

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

F-7

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

F-8

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

F-9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-10-F-57

LOGO

Deloitte & Touche LLP

1700 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-3984

USA

Tel:   215 246 2300

Fax:  215 569 2441

www.deloitte.com

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Management of

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

Toms River, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Sun Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sun Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

LOGO

March 22, 2018

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Dollars in thousands, except par value amounts)

December 31,

  2017  2016 

ASSETS

   

Cash and due from banks

  $20,642  $19,645 

Interest-earning bank balances

   68,002   114,563 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   88,644   134,208 

Restricted cash

   1,000   5,000 

Investment securities available for sale (amortized cost of $264,809 and $300,028 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)

   260,203   295,686 

Investment securities held to maturity (estimated fair value of $0 and $250 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)

      250 

Loans receivable (net of allowance for loan losses of $14,070 and $15,541 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)

   1,561,193   1,594,377 

Restricted equity investments, at cost

   16,967   15,791 

Bank properties and equipment, net

   27,092   30,148 

Accrued interest receivable

   5,304   5,122 

Goodwill

   38,188   38,188 

Bank owned life insurance (BOLI)

   85,064   83,109 

Deferred taxes, net

   53,583   51,573 

Other assets

   5,268   8,810 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $2,142,506  $2,262,262 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

LIABILITIES

   

Deposits

  $1,650,435  $1,741,363 

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLBNY)

   85,214   85,416 

Obligation under capital lease

   5,859   6,292 

Junior subordinated debentures

   51,548   92,786 

Other liabilities

   13,099   16,696 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,806,155   1,942,553 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15)

   

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

Preferred stock, $1 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued

       

Common stock, $5 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized; 19,157,362 shares

issued and 19,136,615 outstanding at December 31, 2017; 19,030,704 shares issued and

    18,922,726 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016

   95,787   95,154 

Additional paid-in capital

   509,922   508,593 

Retained deficit

   (264,686  (276,501

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (2,724  (2,568

Deferred compensation plan trust

   (1,319  (1,160

Treasury stock at cost, 20,747 shares at December 31, 2017; and 107,978 at December 31, 2016

   (629  (3,809
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   336,351   319,709 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $      2,142,506  $      2,262,262 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Years Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015 

INTEREST INCOME

    

Interest and fees on loans

  $65,312  $62,014  $61,271 

Interest on taxable investment securities

   6,968   6,715   7,268 

Interest on non-taxable investment securities

         851 

Dividends on restricted equity investments

   974   881   818 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest income

   73,254   69,610   70,208 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INTEREST EXPENSE

    

Interest on deposits

   6,669   5,958   5,337 

Interest on funds borrowed

   2,136   2,173   2,073 

Interest on junior subordinated debentures

   2,645   2,575   2,200 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest expense

   11,450   10,706   9,610 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income

   61,804   58,904   60,598 

REVERSAL OF PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

   (1,531  (1,682  (3,280
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income after reversal of provision for loan

losses

   63,335   60,586   63,878 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NON-INTEREST INCOME

    

Service charges on deposit accounts

   5,379   6,221   6,988 

Interchange fees

   1,958   1,905   2,115 

Gain on sale of bank branches

         10,553 

Net gain on sale of loans

      101   1,444 

Net gain on sales and calls of investment securities

   30   426   1,468 

Investment products income

   1,079   1,707   2,025 

BOLI income

   1,955   1,934   2,043 

Other income

   1,487   1,095   989 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

   11,888   13,389   27,625 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

    

Salaries and employee benefits

   37,768   34,971   37,013 

Occupancy expense

   8,587   8,988   12,811 

Equipment expense

   4,757   4,786   8,417 

Data processing expense

   3,860   4,503   5,018 

Professional fees

   2,667   2,246   3,230 

Insurance expense

   1,512   2,164   4,528 

Advertising expense

   1,271   1,660   1,520 

Problem loan expense

   345   411   1,259 

Other expense

   3,316   5,224   6,290 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-interest expense

   64,083   64,953   80,086 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   11,140   9,022   11,417 

INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE

   (1,437  (52,395  1,197 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON

    

SHAREHOLDERS

  $12,577  $61,417  $10,220 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

  $0.66  $3.26  $0.55 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

  $0.65  $3.24  $0.55 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares – basic

     19,060,790     18,843,077     18,648,339 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares – diluted

   19,230,136   18,933,330   18,710,159 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in thousands)

   For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
   2017  2016  2015 

NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON

    

SHAREHOLDERS

  $12,577  $61,417  $10,220 

Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax (See Note 2)

    

Unrealized loss on securities:

    

Unrealized holding loss arising during period

   (139  (793  (746

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net

income

   (17  (23  (868
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss

   (156  (816  (1,614
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

  $        12,421  $        60,601  $        8,606 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands)

  Preferred
Stock
  Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Retained
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other

Comprehensive
Loss
  Deferred
Compensation
Plan Trust
  Treasury
Stock
  Total 
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2015 $  $94,504  $514,075  $(347,762 $(138 $(599 $(14,757 $245,323 

Net income

           10,220            10,220 

Other comprehensive loss

              (1,614        (1,614

Exercise of stock options

        (53           68   15 

Issuance of common stock

     50   (5,058        (523  5,993   462 

Stock-based compensation

     127   1,695            287   1,982 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2015 $  $94,554  $510,659  $(337,542 $(1,752 $(1,122 $(8,409 $256,388 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

           61,417            61,417 

Other comprehensive loss

              (816        (816

Exercise of stock options

        (88           159   71 

Issuance of common stock

     600   (4,507        (38  4,441   496 

Stock-based compensation

        2,529               2,529 

Dividends paid to common

shareholders

           (376           (376
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2016 $  $95,154  $508,593  $(276,501 $(2,568 $(1,160 $(3,809 $319,709 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

           12,577            12,577 

Other comprehensive loss

              (156        (156

Exercise of stock options

        (107           213   106 

Issuance of common stock

     633   (4,035        (159  2,967   (594

Stock-based compensation

        5,471               5,471 

Dividends paid to common

shareholders

           (762           (762
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2017 $  $  95,787  $  509,922  $(264,686 $(2,724 $(1,319 $(629 $  336,351 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

Years Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

Net income

  $12,577  $61,417  $10,220 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

    

Release of provision for loan losses

   (1,531  (1,682  (3,280

Increase in off-balance sheet reserves

   276   446   701 

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

   3,601   3,055   7,599 

Impairment of bank properties and equipment and real estate owned

   430      2,666 

Gain on sales and calls of investment securities

   (30  (426  (1,468

Loss (gain) on other real estate owned

      15   (43

Gain on sale of consumer loans

      (101  (1,444

Gain on sale of branches

         (10,553

Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI

   (1,955  (1,934  (2,043

Deferred income taxes

   (1,903  (52,533  1,124 

Stock-based compensation

   5,471   2,529   1,982 

Change in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:

    

Accrued interest receivable

   (182  (465  740 

Other assets

   363   2,534   (4,272

Other liabilities

   (1,650  (949  (3,535
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   15,467   11,906   (1,606
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Purchases of available for sale investment securities

   (101,430  (98,971  (13,757

Net purchase of restricted equity securities

   (1,176  (58  (772

Proceeds from maturities, prepayments or calls of investment securities available for sale

   68,605   50,326   66,288 

Proceeds from maturities, prepayments or calls of investment securities held to maturity

   250      37 

Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale

   67,883   35,744   57,798 

Proceeds from the sale of commercial and consumer loans

      1,809   10,749 

Proceeds from the sale of branch

         11,578 

Proceeds from the sale of branch loans

         63,756 

Proceeds from the sale of bank properties and equipment

      150   4,387 

Transfer of restricted cash to cash and cash equivalents

   4,000      8,000 

Net increase (decrease) in loans

   35,103   (63,535  (45,208

Purchases of bank properties and equipment

   (841  (2,167  (1,012

Proceeds from sale of real estate owned

      266   1,050 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   72,394   (76,436  162,894 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Net decrease in deposits

   (90,896  (4,675  (345,658

Cash paid in sale of deposits

         (183,690

Cash dividends paid to shareholders

   (762  (376   

Net redemptions of securities sold under agreements to repurchase – customer

         (1,156

(Repayments) borrowings of advances from FHLBNY

   (202  (191  24,820 

Repayment of obligation under capital lease

   (433  (406  (337

Redemption of junior subordinated debentures

   (41,238      

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

         600 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

   107   71   15 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (133,425  (5,577  (505,406
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   (45,564  (70,107  (344,118

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR

   134,208   204,315   548,433 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR

  $88,644  $134,208  $204,315 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

    

Interest paid

  $11,498  $10,598  $12,633 

Income taxes paid

   102   114    

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH ITEMS

    

Transfer of loans and bank properties to real estate owned

  $  $908  $945 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(All dollar amounts presented in the tables, except share and per share amounts, are in thousands)

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Sun Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company is the parent company of Sun National Bank (the “Bank”), a national bank and the Company’s principal wholly owned subsidiary. The Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries are Prosperis Financial Solutions, LLC, 2020 Properties, L.L.C. and 4040 Properties, L.L.C.

The Company’s principal business is to serve as a holding company for the Bank. The Bank is in the business of attracting customer deposits through its Community Banking Centers and investing these funds, together with borrowed funds and cash from operations, in loans, primarily commercial real estate, small business non-real estate loans, as well as mortgage-backed and investment securities. The principal business of Prosperis Financial Solutions, LLC is to offer mutual funds, securities brokerage, annuities and investment advisory services through the Bank’s Community Banking Centers. The principal business of 2020 Properties, L.L.C. and 4040 Properties, L.L.C. is to acquire and thereafter certain real estate and other assets in satisfaction of debts previously contracted by the Bank. The Company’s five capital trusts, Sun Capital Trust V, Sun Capital Trust VI, Sun Capital Trust VII, Sun Statutory Trust VII and Sun Capital Trust VIII, collectively, the “Issuing Trusts,” are presented on a deconsolidated basis. The Issuing Trusts, consisting of four Delaware business trusts and one Connecticut business trust, hold junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company.

Through the Bank, the Company provides commercial and consumer banking services. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had 35 locations primarily throughout New Jersey including 30 branch offices. The Company also has headquarters, back office and loan production locations, including one loan production office located in New York.

On June 30, 2017, the Company entered into a definitive agreement (“Merger Agreement”) with OceanFirst Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: OCFC) (“OceanFirst”), a Delaware corporation and the parent company of OceanFirst Bank and Mercury Merger Sub Corp. (“Merger Sub”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub would merge with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving entity (the “First-Step Merger”), and immediately following the First-Step Merger, the Company would merge with and into OceanFirst, with OceanFirst as the surviving entity (together with the First-Step Merger, the “Merger”). The Merger was unanimously approved by the boards of directors of each of the Company and OceanFirst in June 2017. On October 24 and 25, 2017, the Company and OceanFirst received their respective requisite shareholder approvals for the Merger. Regulatory approval of the Merger was received from both the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (the “Federal Reserve Bank”) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) in October 2017. The Merger was completed on January 31, 2018. Immediately following the consummation of the Merger, the Bank merged with and into OceanFirst Bank, with OceanFirst Bank as the surviving bank.

Upon completion of the Merger, each outstanding share of Company common stock was converted into the right to receive, at the election of each Company shareholder and subject to an allocation and proration procedure set forth in the Merger Agreement, either:

(i) an amount in cash (the “Cash Consideration”) equal to $24.99 (which is the sum of (A) $3.78 and (B) $21.21 (the product of 0.7884 and $26.9058, the volume-weighted average trading price of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of OceanFirst common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (as reported byThe Wall Street Journal) for the five full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding January 31, 2018; or

(ii) 0.9289 shares of Ocean First common stock, which is a number of shares of OceanFirst common stock equal to the quotient (the “Exchange Ratio”), rounded to the nearest one-ten thousandth, of (A) the Cash

Consideration divided by (B) the OceanFirst closing price (the “Stock Consideration” and, together with the Cash Consideration and any cash (without interest) in lieu of fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock, the “Merger Consideration”).

The allocation and proration are subject to the allocation and proration procedures applicable to oversubscription and undersubscription of the Cash Consideration set forth in the Merger Agreement. The aggregate amount of Cash Consideration is $72,366,671.16, with approximately 2,895,825 shares of the Company’s common stock being converted into the right to receive the Cash Consideration, and the remaining shares of the Company’s common stock being converted into the right to receive the Stock Consideration. The number of shares of OceanFirst common stock issuable as the Stock Consideration was 15,093,507. Based on the results of the shareholder elections, the Cash Consideration was oversubscribed. Accordingly, (i) all of the Company’s shares with respect to which a valid stock election was made, and all of the non-election shares under the Merger Agreement, were converted into the right to receive the Stock Consideration and (ii) 34% of the Company’s shares with respect to which a valid cash election was made (the “Cash Election Shares”) were converted into the right to receive the Cash Consideration, while the remaining 66% of the Cash Election Shares were converted into the right to receive the Stock Consideration. The available Cash Consideration was allocated on a pro rata basis among all of the holders of cash election shares such that 34% of each such holder’s cash election shares were entitled to receive the Cash Consideration, and the remaining 66% of each such holder’s cash election shares were entitled to receive the Stock Consideration.

At December 31, 2017, the Company’s outstanding common stock traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “SNBC.” At that time, the Company was subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company’s primary federal regulator is the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) and the Bank’s primary federal regulator is the OCC. Upon completion of the Merger, the Company was delisted by the SEC.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation. The accounting and reporting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and to general practices in the banking industry. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. The significant estimates include the allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on investment securities, goodwill, income taxes, stock-based compensation, and the fair value of financial instruments. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Basis of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include, after all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated, the accounts of the Company, its principal wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank, and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiary, Prosperis Financial Solutions, LLC. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 810, Consolidation, the Issuing Trusts are deconsolidated. See Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s participation in the Issuing Trusts.

Segment Information. As defined in accordance with FASB ASC 280, Segment Reporting(FASB ASC 280), the Company has one reportable and operating segment, “Community Banking.” All of the Company’s activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent and assessed based on how each of the activities of the Company supports the others. For example, lending is dependent upon the ability of the Company to fund itself with deposits and other borrowings and manage interest rate and credit risk. Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based upon analysis of the Company as one segment or unit.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents includes cash and amounts due from banks, interest-earning bank balances and federal funds sold, all of which have original maturity dates of 90 days or less.

Restricted Cash. Restricted cash includes cash held as collateral against customer letters of credit held with another bank.

Investment Securities. The Company’s investment portfolio includes both held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities. The purchase and sale of the Company’s investment securities are recorded based on trade date accounting. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no unsettled transactions. The following provides further information on the Company’s accounting for debt securities:

Held-to-Maturity - Investment securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at their remaining unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums or unaccreted discounts. Premiums are amortized and discounts are accreted using the interest method over the estimated remaining term of the underlying security.

Available-for-Sale - Investment securities that will be held for indefinite periods of time, including securities that may be sold in response to changes in market interest or prepayment rates, needs for liquidity, and changes in the availability and the yield of alternative investments, are classified as available-for-sale. These assets are carried at their estimated fair value. Fair values are based on quoted prices for identical assets in active markets, quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are either actively or not actively traded, or in some cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs, internally developed discounted cash flow models. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and are reported net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated statements of financial condition until realized, including those recognized through the non-credit component of an OTTI charge.

In accordance with FASB ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets(FASB ASC 325-40), and FASB ASC 320,Investment - Debt and Equity Securities (FASB ASC 320), the Company evaluates its securities portfolio for OTTI throughout the year. Each investment, which has a fair value less than the book value, is reviewed on a quarterly basis by management. Management considers, at a minimum, whether the following factors exist that, both individually or in combination, could indicate that the decline is other-than-temporary: (a) the Company has the intent to sell the security; (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery; and (c) the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Among the factors that are considered in determining the Company’s intent is a review of capital adequacy, interest rate risk profile and liquidity at the Company. An impairment charge is recorded against individual securities if the review described above concludes that the decline in value is other-than-temporary. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, it was determined that there were no other-than-temporarily impaired investments. As a result, the Company did not record credit related OTTI charges through earnings during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Deferred Loan Fees. Loan fees on loans held-for-investment, net of certain direct loan origination costs, are deferred and the balance is amortized to income as a yield adjustment over the life of the loan using the interest method.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is determined by management based upon past experience, evaluation of estimated loss and impairment in the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other pertinent factors. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that management considers adequate to provide for estimated losses and impairment based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risk in the loan portfolio. Loan impairment is evaluated based on the fair value of collateral less estimated selling costs. While management uses the best information available to make such evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations.

The provision for loan losses is based upon historical loan loss experience, a series of qualitative factors and an evaluation of estimated losses in the current loan portfolio, including the evaluation of impaired loans under

FASB ASC 310, Receivables (“FASB ASC 310”). Values assigned to the qualitative factors and those developed from historic loss experience provide a dynamic basis for the calculation of reserve factors for both pass-rated loans (general pooled allowance) and those criticized and classified loans that continue to perform. For the commercial loan portfolio, historic loss and recovery experience over a two-year horizon, based on a rolling28-quarter migration analysis, is taken into account for the quantitative factor component. For the non-commercial loan quantitative component, the average loss history and recovery experience for a one-year period based on a rolling 12-quarter time period is utilized for the allowance calculation. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being identified as impaired. For this purpose, delays less than 90 days are considered to be insignificant. Impairment losses are included in the provision for loan losses. Loans not individually reviewed are evaluated as a group using reserve factor percentages based on historical loss experience and qualitative factors. Included in these qualitative factors are:

Levels of past due, classified and non-accrual loans, and troubled debt restructurings

Nature, volume and concentrations of loans

Historical loss trends

Changes in lending policies and procedures, underwriting standards, collections, and for commercial loans, the level of loans being approved with exceptions to policy

Experience, ability and depth of management and staff

National and local economic and business conditions, including various market segments

Quality of the Company’s loan review system and degree of Board oversight; and

Effect of external factors, including the deterioration of collateral values, on the level of estimated credit losses in the current portfolio

Commercial loans, including commercial real estate loans, are placed on non-accrual status at the time the loan has been delinquent for 90 days unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Generally, commercial loans, including commercial real estate loans, are charged-off no later than 180 days after becoming delinquent unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection, or other extenuating circumstances support collection. Residential real estate loans are typically placed on non-accrual status at the time the loan has been delinquent for 90 days. Other consumer loans are typically charged-off at 180 days delinquent. In all cases, loans must be placed on non-accrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

Restricted Equity Securities. Certain securities are classified as restricted equity securities because ownership is restricted and there is not an established market for their resale. These securities are carried at cost and are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis.

Bank Properties and Equipment. Land is carried at cost. Bank properties and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation, which is recorded in equipment expense on the consolidated statements of operations, is computed by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally as follows:

Asset Type

Estimated Useful Life

Buildings

40 years

Leasehold improvements

Lesser of the useful life or the remaining lease term, including renewals, if applicable
Furniture, Fixtures and EquipmentThree to 10 years

Computer Software

Three years

Goodwill. Goodwill is the excess of the fair value of liabilities assumed over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of December 31, unless circumstances indicate that a test is required at an earlier date. The Company elected to not apply the qualitative evaluation option permitted under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-8,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 35): Testing Goodwill for Impairment issued in September 2011. Therefore, the Company utilizes the two-step goodwill impairment test outlined in FASB ASC 350,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“FASB ASC 350”). Step one, which is used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. A reporting unit is an operating segment, or one level below an operating segment, as defined in FASB ASC 280. The Company has one reportable operating segment, “Community Banking,” and there are no components to this operating segment. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and step two is therefore unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. At each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test, and step one of the analysis indicated that the Company’s fair value was greater than its carrying value. Therefore, the Company’s goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2017 and 2016. The carrying amount of goodwill totaled $38.2 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”). The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain key employees. These policies are recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized in accordance with FASB ASC 325-30, Investments in Insurance Contracts. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $29.2 million invested in a general account and $55.8 million in a separate account, for a total BOLI cash surrender value of $85.1 million. The BOLI separate account is invested in a mortgage-backed securities fund, which is managed by an independent investment firm. Pricing volatility of these underlying instruments may have an impact on investment income; however, the fluctuations would be partially mitigated by a stable value wrap agreement which is a component of the separate account. Income from these policies and changes in the cash surrender value are recorded in BOLI income of the consolidated statements of operations.

Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments at fair value as either assets or liabilities in other assets or other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship. For derivatives not designated as hedges, the gain or loss is recognized in current earnings.

The Company’s derivative financial instruments are not exchange-traded and therefore are valued utilizing models that use as their basis readily observable market parameters, specifically the LIBOR swap curve.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. The Company classifies items of accumulated other comprehensive loss by their nature and displays the details of other comprehensive loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss). Amounts categorized as accumulated other comprehensive loss represent net unrealized gains or losses on investment securities available for sale, net of tax and the non-credit portion of any OTTI loss not recorded in earnings. Reclassifications are made to avoid double counting items which are displayed as part of net income (loss) for the period. These reclassifications for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

DISCLOSURE OF RECLASSIFICATION AMOUNTS, NET OF TAX

Years Ended December 31,

 2017  2016  2015 
    Pre-tax      Tax     After-tax     Pre-tax      Tax     After-tax     Pre-tax    Tax   After-tax  
Unrealized holding loss on securities available for sale during the year $(235 $96  $(139 $(1,340 $547  $(793 $(1,262 $516  $(746

Reclassification adjustment for net gain included in net income(1)

  (30  13   (17  (39  16   (23  (1,468  600   (868
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale

 $(265 $  109  $(156 $  (1,379 $  563  $(816 $  (2,730 $  1,116  $(1,614
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

All pre-tax amounts are included in non-interest income in the consolidated statements of operations.

Treasury Stock. Stock held in treasury by the Company is accounted for using the cost method which treats stock held in treasury as a reduction to total shareholders’ equity. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company held 20,747 and 107,978 shares of treasury stock, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to employees, and when appropriate, non-employees, in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, (“FASB ASC 718”). Under the fair value provisions of FASB ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the appropriate vesting period using the straight-line method. However, consistent with FASB ASC 718, the amount of stock-based compensation cost recognized at any date must at least equal the portion of the grant date value of the award that is vested at that date and, as a result, it may be necessary to recognize the expense using a ratable method. Although the provisions of FASB ASC 718 should generally be applied to non-employees, FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, is used in determining the measurement date of the compensation expense for non-employees.

Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the measurement date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term of the stock options and the expected volatility of the Company’s stock. In addition, judgment is required in estimating the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited.

The Company’s stock-based incentive plan authorizes the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to awards that may be granted in the form of stock options to purchase common stock (“Options”) and awards of shares of common stock (“Stock Awards”). The purpose of the Company’s stock-based incentive plan is to give the Company a competitive advantage in attracting, retaining, and motivating officers, employees, directors, and consultants and to provide the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates with a compensation plan providing incentives for future performance of services directly linked to the profitability of the Company’s businesses and increases in Company shareholder value. Under the Company’s stock-based incentive plan, Options expire ten years after the date of grant, unless terminated earlier under the Option’s terms. For both Options and Stock Awards, a committee of non-employee directors has the authority to determine the conditions upon which the Options or Stock Awards granted will vest.

In accordance with FASB ASC 718, the fair value of the Options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model which uses the assumptions noted in the table below. The expected term of an Option is estimated using historical exercise behavior of employees at a particular level of management who were granted Options with a comparable term. The Options have historically been granted a 10 year term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price.

Significant weighted average assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the Options for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS USED IN BLACK-SCHOLES OPTION PRICING MODEL

Years Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015 

Fair value of Options granted during the year

  $        —  $        5.90  $        6.16 

Risk-free rate of return

     1.29  1.35

Expected term in months

      50   46 

Expected volatility

     33  40

Expected dividends(1)

  $  $  $ 

(1)

The Company did not declare cash dividends on its common stock prior to the options granted in 2016. Future option grants will include a dividend assumption.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had one stock-based compensation plan, which is described more fully in Note 13.

Interest Income on Loans. Interest income on loans is credited to operations based upon the principal amount outstanding. Interest accruals are generally discontinued when a loan becomes 90 days past due, or when principal or interest is considered doubtful of collection. When interest accruals are discontinued or unpaid, interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in the prior year is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Any interest payments received while interest accruals are discontinued are applied to the principal balance of the loan.

Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (“FASB ASC 740”). FASB ASC 740 requires the recording of deferred income taxes that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Management exercises significant judgment in the evaluation of the amount and timing of the recognition of the resulting tax assets and liabilities. The judgments and estimates required for the evaluation are updated based upon changes in business factors and the tax laws. If actual results differ from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating the amount and timing of tax recognized, there can be no assurance that additional expenses will not be required in future periods. The Company recognizes, when applicable, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations. Assessment of uncertain tax positions under FASB ASC 740 requires careful consideration of the technical merits of a position based on management’s analysis of tax regulations and interpretations. Significant judgment is applied when addressing the requirements of FASB ASC 740.

In determining whether to establish or maintain a valuation allowance against a deferred tax asset, the Company reviews available evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the Company’s net deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods. Consideration is given to various positive and negative factors that could affect the realization of the net deferred tax assets. In making such a determination, the Company considers, among other things, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, historical financial performance, the length

of statutory carry forward periods, experience with operating loss and tax credit carry forwards not expiring unused. If the Company determines that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Company would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted resulting in significant modifications to existing law, including a reduction in the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. See Note 17 for additional information on the Company’s application of FASB ASC 740.

Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, net of any treasury shares, during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, net of any treasury shares, after consideration of the potential dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, based upon the treasury stock method using an average market price of common shares sold during the period. Dilution is not considered when the Company is in a net loss position.

Recent Accounting Principles. In February 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards update (“ASU”) 2018-2:Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). The amendments in this Update allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Consequently, the amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and will improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. However, because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-12:Derivatives and Hedging(Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments in this ASU better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. To meet that objective, the amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. Current GAAP contains limitations on how an entity can designate the hedged risk in certain cash flow and fair value hedging relationships. To address those current limitations, the amendments in this ASU permit hedge accounting for risk components in hedging relationships involving nonfinancial risk and interest rate risk. In addition, the amendments in this ASU change the guidance for designating fair value hedges of interest rate risk and for measuring the change in fair value of the hedged item in fair value hedges of interest rate risk. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09:Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. This ASU provides clarity and reduces both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. An entity may change the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award for many different reasons, and the nature and effect of the change can vary significantly. Stakeholders observed that the definition of the term modification is broad and that its interpretation results in diversity in practice. Some entities evaluate whether a change to the terms or conditions of an award is

substantive. When those entities conclude that a change is substantive, they apply modification accounting in Topic 718. When those entities conclude that a change is not substantive, they do not apply modification accounting. Topic 718 does not contain guidance about what changes are substantive. Other entities apply modification accounting for any change to an award; except for a change they deem to be purely administrative in nature. However, Topic 718 does not provide guidance about what changes are purely administrative. Still, other entities apply modification accounting when a change to an award changes the fair value, the vesting, or the classification of the award. In those cases, it appears that an evaluation of a change in fair value, vesting, or classification may be used in practice to evaluate whether a change is substantive. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08:Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. The amendments in this ASU shortened the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium by requiring the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held a discount, which continue to be amortized to maturity. The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities that hold investments in callable debt securities that have an amortized cost basis in excess of the amount that is repayable by the issuer at the earliest call date. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04:Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amendments in this ASU modify the concept of impairment from the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value to the condition that exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. An entity no longer will determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Because these amendments eliminate Step two from the goodwill impairment test, they should reduce the cost and complexity of evaluating goodwill for impairment. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after that December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its financial statements.

In November 2016, The FASB issued ASU 2016-18:Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The amendments in this Update require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities that have restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents and are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If early an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustment should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption of this accounting standards update on its financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15:Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in this Update address the following eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice: (1) debt prepayments or debt extinguishment cost (cash outflow-financing), (2) settlement of debt instruments with coupon interest rates insignificant to the effective interest rate, Interest payment (cash outflow-operating), principal payment (cash outflow-financing), (3) contingent consideration payments made soon after business combination (cash

outflow-investing), (4) proceeds from settlement of insurance claims (classification on basis of the nature of each loss), (5) proceeds from corporate/bank-owned life insurance, proceeds (cash inflow-investing), payments (cash outflow-investing/operating), (6) distribution received from equity method investees, cumulative earnings approach (cash inflow-investing), nature of distribution approach (cash inflow-operating/investing), (7) beneficial interest in securitization transactions, assets (noncash transaction), cash receipts from trade receivable (cash inflow-investing), (8) separately identifiable cash flows (classified based on source-financing/investing/operating). The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on its financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13:Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which applies to entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The amendments broaden the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 for public business entities are effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02:Leases (Topic 842). This ASU is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions and affects all companies and other organizations that lease assets such as real estate, airplanes, and manufacturing equipment. The ASU will require organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases with over twelve month terms. The accounting by organizations that own the assets leased by the lessee will remain largely unchanged from current requirements under GAAP. However, the ASU contains some targeted improvements that are intended to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and with the updated revenue recognition guidance issued in 2014. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on its financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01:Financial Instruments- Overall (Subtopic 825-10). The amendments in this ASU affect all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. The amendments in this ASU make targeted improvements to GAAP as follows: (1) Require certain equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (2) simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (3) eliminate the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (4) eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (5) require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (6) require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; (7) require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (8) clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to

available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on its financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09:Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Summary and Amendments That Create Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Other Assets and Deferred Costs-Contracts with Customers (Subtopic 340-40), Conforming Amendments to Other Topics and Subtopics in the Codification and Status Tables, Background Information and Basis for Conclusions. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the considerations to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance in this Update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. For a public entity, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is still assessing the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its financial condition or results of operations.

3. BRANCH SALES AND CONSOLIDATIONS

On March 6, 2015, the Company sold seven branch offices to Sturdy Savings Bank. In accordance with the sale, the Company sold $153.3 million of deposits, $63.8 million of loans, $4.0 million of fixed assets and $897 thousand of cash. The transaction resulted in a net cash payment of approximately $71.5 million by the Company to Sturdy Savings Bank. After transaction costs, the sale resulted in a net gain of $9.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 which was recorded in gain on sale of bank branches in the audited consolidated statements of operations.

On August 28, 2015, the Company sold its Hammonton branch location to Cape Bank. In accordance with the sale, the Company sold $32.0 million in deposits, $4.8 million in loans, $354 thousand in fixed assets and $143 thousand of cash. The transaction resulted in a net cash payment of approximately $25.5 million by the Company to Cape Bank. After transaction costs, the sale resulted in a net gain of $1.3 million which was recorded in gain on sale of bank branches in the consolidated statements of operations.

During 2015, the Company closed five leased and four owned branch offices. The Company recognized $3.5 million in expenses as a result of these closures.

4. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost of investment securities and the approximate fair value at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES

   Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
 

December 31, 2017

       

Available for sale:

       

U.S. Treasury securities

  $3,500   $   $(5 $3,495 

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed

securities

   247,545    130    (3,415  244,261 

Trust preferred securities

   12,029    129    (1,421  10,737 

Collateralized loan obligations

               

Other securities

   1,735        (25  1,710 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total available for sale

   264,809    259    (4,866  260,203 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Held to maturity:

       

Other securities

               
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

               
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total investment securities

  $264,809   $259   $(4,866 $260,203 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

       

Available for sale:

       

U.S. Treasury securities

  $2,498   $   $  $2,498 

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed

securities

   246,650    583    (2,575  244,658 

Trust preferred securities

   12,023        (2,172  9,851 

Collateralized loan obligations

   37,471    8    (160  37,319 

Other securities

   1,386        (26  1,360 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total available for sale

     300,028             591    (4,933  295,686 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Held to maturity:

       

Other securities

   250                   —   250 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

   250           250 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total investment securities

  $300,278   $591   $(4,933 $  295,936 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

During 2017, four available-for-sale securities were sold prior to maturity for gross proceeds of $13.7 million, which resulted in net realized gains of $30 thousand. Additionally, during 2017, the Bank had two securities mature for gross proceeds of $2.8 million and four securities were called with an aggregate par value of $24.0 million. During 2016, the Company had one security called prior to maturity for gross proceeds of $5.0 million and a gain of $22 thousand and six available-for-sale securities were sold prior to maturity for gross proceeds of $30.3 million, which resulted in gross realized gains of $39 thousand. The Company received gross proceeds of $248 thousand due to the maturity of one security during 2016. The following table provides the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES BY INVESTMENT CATEGORY

   Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer  Total 
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 

December 31, 2017

          
U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities  $106,905   $(829 $123,426   $(2,586 $230,331   $(3,415

U.S. Treasury Securities

   3,495    (5         3,495    (5

Trust preferred securities

          7,402    (1,421  7,402    (1,421

Collateralized loan obligations

                      

Other securities

          975    (25  975    (25
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $110,400   $(834 $131,803   $(4,032 $242,203   $(4,866
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

          

U.S. Government agency mortgage-

backed securities

  $108,070   $(1,683 $54,757   $(892 $162,827   $(2,575

Trust preferred securities

          9,851    (2,172  9,851    (2,172

Collateralized loan obligations

          33,825    (160  33,825    (160

Other securities

   975    (26         975    (26
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $  109,045   $(1,709 $98,433   $(3,224 $  207,478   $(4,933
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company determines whether unrealized losses are temporary in nature in accordance with FASB ASC 325-40, when applicable, and FASB ASC 320-10,Investments - Overall, (“FASB ASC 320-10”). The evaluation is based upon factors such as the creditworthiness of the underlying borrowers, performance of the underlying collateral, if applicable, and the level of credit support in the security structure. Management also evaluates other factors and circumstances that may be indicative of an OTTI condition. This includes, but is not limited to, an evaluation of the type of security, length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost and near-term prospects of the issuer.

FASB ASC 320-10 requires the Company to assess if an OTTI exists by considering whether the Company has the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery. If either of these situations applies, the guidance requires the Company to record an OTTI charge to earnings on debt securities for the difference between the amortized cost basis of the security and the fair value of the security. If neither of these situations applies, the Company is required to assess whether it is expected to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If the Company is not expected to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, the guidance requires the Company to bifurcate the identified OTTI into a credit loss component and a component representing loss related to other factors. A discount rate is applied which equals the effective yield of the security. The difference between the present value of the expected flows and the amortized book value is considered a credit loss, which would be recorded through earnings as an OTTI charge. When a market price is not readily available, the market value of the security is determined using the

same expected cash flows; the discount rate is a rate the Company determines from the open market and other sources as appropriate for the security. The difference between the market value and the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s cumulative OTTI was $1.2 million. There were no OTTI charges recognized in earnings as a result of credit losses on investments in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

U.S. Government Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities.At December 31, 2017, the gross unrealized loss in the category of less than 12 months of $829 thousand consisted of 23 mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $106.9 million issued and guaranteed by a U.S. Government sponsored agency. The gross unrealized loss in the category of 12 months or longer of $2.6 million consisted of 35 mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $123.4 million, issued and guaranteed by a U.S. Government sponsored agency. The Company monitors key credit metrics such as market rates and possible credit deterioration to determine if an OTTI exists. Upon evaluation, Management determined that interest rate changes and market conditions have driven the unrealized losses in these securities. As of December 31, 2017, management concluded that an OTTI did not exist on any of the aforementioned securities based upon its assessment. Management also concluded that it does not intend to sell nor will it be required to sell the securities, before their recovery, which may be maturity, and management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

Other Securities. At December 31, 2017, the gross unrealized loss in the category of greater than 12 months of $25 thousand consisted of one security with an estimated fair value of $975 thousand issued and guaranteed by a U.S. Government sponsored agency. The Company monitors key credit metrics such as market rates and possible credit deterioration to determine if an OTTI exists. Upon evaluation, Management has determined that interest rate changes and market conditions have driven the unrealized loss in this security. As of December 31, 2017, management concluded that an OTTI did not exist on the aforementioned security based upon its assessment. Management also concluded that it does not intend nor will it be required to sell the security, before its recovery, which may be maturity, and management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of this security.

Trust Preferred Securities.At December 31, 2017, the gross unrealized loss in the category of 12 months or longer of $1.4 million consisted of one trust preferred security. The trust preferred security is an investment grade rated pooled security with an amortized cost of $8.8 million and estimated fair value of $7.4 million at December 31, 2017.

For the pooled security, the Company monitors each issuer in the collateral pool with respect to financial performance using data from the issuer’s most recent regulatory reports as well as information on issuer deferrals and defaults. Also the security structure is monitored with respect to collateral coverage and current levels of subordination. Expected future cash flows are projected assuming additional defaults and deferrals based on the performance of the collateral pool. The investment grade pooled security is in a senior position in the capital structure. The security had a 3.7 times principal coverage. As of the most recent reporting date interest has been paid in accordance with the terms of the security. The Company reviews projected cash flow analysis for adverse changes in the present value of projected future cash flows that may result in an other-than-temporary credit impairment to be recognized through earnings. The most recent valuations assumed no recovery on any defaulted collateral, no recovery on any deferring collateral and an additional 3.6% of defaults or deferrals every three years with no recovery rate. As of December 31, 2017, management concluded that an OTTI did not exist on the aforementioned security based upon its assessment. Management also concluded that it does not intend to sell the security, and that it is not more likely than not it will be required to sell the security, before its recovery, which may be maturity, and management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of this security.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company’s investment securities at December 31, 2017, by contractual maturity, is shown below. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

CONTRACTUAL MATURITIES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES

   Available for Sale 

December 31, 2017

  Amortized
Cost
   Estimated
Fair Value
 

Due in one year or less

  $4,234   $4,230 

Due after one year through five years

        

Due after five years through ten years

        

Due after ten years

   13,030    11,712 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment securities, excluding

mortgage-backed Securities

   17,263    15,942 

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed

securities

   223,436    220,132 

Other mortgage-backed securities

   24,109    24,129 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment securities

  $  264,809   $  260,203 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

At December 31, 2017, the Company had $10.6 million, amortized cost and estimated fair value, of investment securities pledged to secure public deposits. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $98.1 million, amortized cost, and $96.7 million, estimated fair value, of investment securities pledged as collateral on secured borrowings.

5. LOANS RECEIVABLE

The components of loans receivables, net at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

Loans Receivable Components

 

December 31,

  2017  2016 

Commercial:

   

Commercial and industrial

  $266,650  $235,946 

CRE owner occupied

   236,889   231,348 

CRE non-owner occupied

   711,144   742,662 

Land and development

   76,775   67,165 

Consumer:

   

Home equity lines of credit

   94,975   110,377 

Home equity term loans

   7,034   9,104 

Residential real estate

   179,855   210,874 

Other

   1,941   2,442 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total gross loans receivable

   1,575,263   1,609,918 

Allowance for loan losses

   (14,070  (15,541
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans receivable, net

  $  1,561,193  $  1,594,377 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans on Non-accrual Status

 

December 31,

  2017   2016 

Commercial:

    

Commercial

  $66   $ 

CRE owner occupied

   362    213 

CRE non-owner occupied

   452    517 

Consumer:

    

Home equity term loans

   58    72 

Residential real estate

   1,619    810 

Other

       85 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-accrual loans

  $2,557   $1,697 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Troubled debt restructurings, non-accrual

  $      1,027   $      1,404 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest income not recognized as a result of non-accrual loans was $107 thousand, $109 thousand and $95 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount of interest included in net income on these loans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $60 thousand, $40 thousand and $59 thousand, respectively.

Many of the Company’s commercial and industrial loans have a real estate component as part of the collateral securing the loan. Additionally, the Company makes commercial real estate loans for the acquisition, refinance, improvement and construction of real property. Loans secured by owner-occupied properties are dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s business. If the operating company experiences difficulties in terms of sales volume and/or profitability, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Loans secured by properties where repayment is dependent upon payment of rent by third-party tenants or the sale of the property may be impacted by loss of tenants, lower lease rates needed to attract new tenants or the inability to sell a completed project in a timely fashion and at a profit.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $2.0 million outstanding on two commercial construction relationships for which the agreements included interest reserves. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $5.9 million outstanding on two commercial construction relationship for which the agreements included interest reserves. The total amount available in those reserves to fund interest payments was $123 thousand and $214 thousand at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. There were no relationships with interest reserves which were on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Construction projects are monitored throughout their lives by the Company through either internal resources or professional inspectors engaged by the Company. The budgets for loan advances and borrower equity injections are developed at the time of underwriting in conjunction with the review of the plans and specifications for the project being financed. Advances of the Company’s funds are based on the prepared budgets and will not be made unless the project has been inspected by the Company’s professional inspector who must certify that the work related to the advance is in place and properly complete. As it relates to construction project financing, the Company does not extend, renew or restructure terms unless its borrower posts cash collateral in an interest reserve.

Included in the Company’s loan portfolio are modified commercial loans. Per FASB ASC 310-40, Troubled Debt Restructurings, a modification is one in which the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider, such as providing for a below market interest rate and/or forgiving principal or previously accrued interest; this modification may stem from an agreement or be imposed by law or a court, and may involve a multiple note structure. Generally, prior to the modification, the loans which are modified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) are already classified as non-performing. These loans may only be returned to performing (i.e. accrual status) after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable amount of time, generally six months; this sustained repayment performance may include the period of time just prior to the restructuring.

Under approved lending decisions, the Company had commitments to lend additional funds totaling $293.1 million and $343.2 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on an individual basis. The type and amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.

Most of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within the State of New Jersey and New York. Generally, commercial real estate, residential real estate and other assets are used to secure loans. The ultimate repayment of loans is dependent, to a certain degree, on the local economy and real estate market. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $418.6 million in loans pledged as collateral on secured borrowings.

6. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables

  For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 
  Commercial
and
Industrial
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Land &
Development
  Home
Equity(1)
  Residential
Real

Estate
  Other(2)  Total 

Allowance for loan losses:

       

Beginning balance

 $2,153  $7,550  $604  $2,349  $2,648  $237  $15,541 

Charge-offs

     (28     (439  (853  (38  (1,358

Recoveries

  208   508   346   267   14   77   1,418 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

  208   480   346   (173  (839  39   60 

Provision for loan losses

  171   (364  (271  (1,014  190   (243  (1,531
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending balance

 $2,532  $7,666  $678  $1,162  $1,999  $33  $14,070 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment $  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $2,532  $7,666  $678  $1,162  $1,999  $33  $14,070 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing Receivables:

       

Ending balance

 $266,650  $948,033  $76,775  $102,009  $179,855  $1,941  $1,575,263 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment $66  $903  $  $58  $2,557  $  $3,584 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $266,584  $947,130  $76,775  $  101,951  $  177,298  $  1,941  $  1,571,679 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Amount includes both home equity lines of credit and term loans

(2)

Includes the unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses.

  For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 
  Commercial
and
Industrial
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Land &
Development
  Home
Equity(1)
  Residential
Real Estate
  Other(2)  Total 

Allowance for loan losses:

       

Beginning balance

 $2,761  $8,142  $1,058  $2,816  $3,029  $202  $18,008 

Charge-offs

  (256  (425     (454  (1,025  (265  (2,425

Recoveries

  252   170   714   351   37   118   1,642 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

  (4  (255  714   (103  (988  (147  (783

Provision for loan losses

  (604  (337  (1,168  (364  607   182   (1,682
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending balance

 $2,153  $7,550  $604  $2,349  $2,648  $237  $15,541 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment $  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $2,153  $7,550  $604  $2,349  $2,648  $237  $15,541 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing Receivables:

       

Ending balance

 $235,946  $974,010  $67,165  $119,481  $210,874  $2,442  $1,609,918 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment $  $860  $  $72  $2,084  $85  $3,101 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $235,946  $973,150  $67,165  $  119,409  $  208,790  $  2,357  $  1,606,817 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Amount includes both home equity lines of credit and term loans

(2)

Includes the unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses.

  For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 
  Commercial
and
Industrial
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Land &
Development
  Home
Equity(1)
  Residential
Real Estate
  Other(2)  Total 

Allowance for loan losses:

       

Beginning balance

 $5,134  $9,615  $958  $3,256  $3,515  $768  $23,246 

Charge-offs

  (375  (836     (2,735  (2,810  (757  (7,513

Recoveries

  3,417   440   351   366   819   162   5,555 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

  3,042   (396  351   (2,369  (1,991  (595  (1,958

Provision for loan losses

  (5,416  (1,077  (251  1,929   1,505   30   (3,280 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending balance

 $2,761  $8,142  $1,058  $2,816  $3,029  $202  $18,008 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment $  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $2,761  $8,142  $1,058  $2,816  $3,029  $202  $18,008 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing Receivables:

       

Ending balance

 $230,681  $853,892  $68,070  $142,784  $249,975  $3,107  $1,548,509 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment $227  $731  $  $88  $1,970  $101  $3,117 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $230,454  $853,161  $68,070  $  142,696  $  248,005  $  3,006  $  1,545,392 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Amount includes both home equity lines of credit and term loans

(2)

Includes the unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses.

Risk Characteristics

Commercial and Industrial Loans. Many of the Company’s commercial and industrial loans have a real estate component as part of the collateral securing the loan. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily secured by assets of the business, such as accounts receivable and inventory. Due to the nature of the collateral securing these loans, the liquidation of these assets may be problematic and costly.

Commercial Real Estate Loans. Commercial real estate owner occupied loans rely on the cash flow from the successful operation of the borrower’s business to make repayment. If the operating company experiences difficulties in terms of sales volume and/or profitability, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Commercial real estate non-owner occupied loans rely on the payment of rent by third party tenants. The borrower’s ability to repay the loan or sell the property may be impacted by loss of tenants, lower lease rates needed to attract new tenants or the inability to sell a completed project in a timely fashion and at a profit. Commercial real estate owner occupied and non-owner occupied loans are secured by the underlying properties. The local economy and real estate market affect the appraised value of these properties which may impact the ultimate repayment of these loans.

Land and Development Loans. Land and development loans are primarily repaid by the sale of the developed properties or by conversion to a permanent term loan. These loans are dependent upon the completion of the project on time and within budget, which may be impacted by general economic conditions. The Company requires cash collateral in an interest reserve in order to extend credit on construction projects to mitigate the credit risk.

Home Equity Loans. This segment consists of both home equity lines of credit and home equity term loans on single family residences. These loans rely on the personal income of the borrower for repayment which may be impacted by economic conditions, such as unemployment levels, interest rates and the housing market. These loans are primarily secured by second liens on properties, which serve as the secondary source of repayment. The secondary source of repayment may be impaired by the real estate market and local regulations. The Company no longer originates home equity lines of credit or home equity term loans.

Residential Real Estate Loans. Included in this segment are residential mortgages on single family residences. These loans rely on the personal income of the borrower for repayment which may be impacted by economic conditions, such as unemployment levels, interest rates and the housing market. These loans are primarily secured by a lien on the underlying property, which serves as the secondary source of repayment. The secondary source of repayment may be impaired by the real estate market and local regulations. The Company no longer originates residential real estate loans on single family residences.

Other Loans. Other loans consist of personal credit lines, mobile home loans and consumer installment loans. These loans rely on the borrowers’ personal income for repayment and are either unsecured or secured by personal use assets and mobile homes. These loans may be impacted by economic conditions such as unemployment levels. The liquidation of the assets securing these loans may be difficult and costly.

The allowance for loan losses was $14.1 million, $15.5 million and $18.0 million at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-for-investment was 0.89%, 0.97% and 1.16% at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The provision for loan losses charged to expense is based upon historical loan loss experience, a series of qualitative factors, and an evaluation of estimated losses in the current commercial loan portfolio, including the evaluation of impaired loans under FASB ASC 310. Values assigned to the qualitative factors and those developed from historic loss experience provide a dynamic basis for the calculation of reserve factors for both pass-rated loans (general pooled allowance) and those criticized and classified loans that continue to perform.

A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in a loan being identified as impaired. For this purpose, delays less than 90 days are considered to be insignificant. Impairment losses are included in the provision for loan losses in the consolidated statements of operations. Impaired loans include accruing and non-accruing TDR loans. Loans not individually reviewed are evaluated as a group using reserve factor percentages based on historical loss and recovery experience and qualitative factors. Such loans generally include consumer loans, residential real estate loans, and small business loans. In determining the appropriate level of the general pooled allowance, management makes estimates based on internal risk ratings, which take into account such factors as debt service coverage, loan-to-value ratios, management’s abilities and external factors.

The following tables present the Company’s components of impaired loans, segregated by class of loans at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Commercial and consumer loans that were collectively evaluated for impairment are not included in the data that follows:

Impaired Loans

As of December 31, 2017

 
   Recorded
Investment
   Unpaid
 Principal 
Balance
   Related
Allowance
   Average
Recorded
Investment
   Accrued
Interest
Income
Recognized
   Cash
Interest
Income
Recognized
 

With no related allowance:

            

Commercial:

            

Commercial & industrial

  $66   $79   $   $72   $   $ 

CRE owner occupied

   451    608        486         

CRE non owner occupied

   452    466        478         

Consumer:

            

Residential real estate

     2,557        2,769          2,168         

Home equity term loans

   58    77        63         

Other

                        

With an allowance recorded:

            

Commercial:

            

Commercial and industrial

                        

CRE owner occupied

                        

Consumer:

            

Other

                        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

  $968   $1,153   $   $1,036   $   $ 

Total consumer

  $2,615   $2,845   $   $2,681   $   $ 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

As of December 31, 2016

 
   Recorded
Investment
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   Related
Allowance
   Average
Recorded
Investment
   Accrued
Interest
Income
Recognized
   Cash
Interest
Income
Recognized
 

With no related allowance:

            

Commercial:

            

CRE owner occupied

  $343   $514   $   $377   $   $ 

CRE non owner occupied

   517    520        523         

Consumer:

            

Residential real estate

     2,084        2,422        2,193         

Home equity term 1

   72    86        74         

Other

   85    89        85         

With an allowance recorded:

            

Commercial:

            

Commercial and industrial

                        

CRE owner occupied

                        

Consumer:

            

Other

                        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

  $860   $1,034   $   $900   $   $ 

Total consumer

  $2,241   $2,597   $   $2,352   $   $ 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

As of December 31, 2015

 
   Recorded
Investment
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   Related
Allowance
   Average
Recorded
Investment
   Accrued
Interest
Income
Recognized
   Cash
Interest
Income
Recognized
 

With no related allowance:

            

Commercial:

            

Commercial and industrial

  $227   $721   $   $231   $   $ 

CRE owner occupied

   683    2,066        702         

Consumer:

            

Residential real estate

     1,970        2,100        1,999         

Home Equity Term Loans

   88    96        91         

Other

   101    101        101         

With an allowance recorded:

            

Commercial:

            

Commercial and industrial

                        

CRE owner occupied

                        

Consumer:

            

Other

                        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

  $910   $2,787   $   $933   $   $ 

Total consumer

  $2,159   $2,297   $   $2,191   $   $ 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

In accordance with FASB ASC 310, those impaired loans for which the collateral is sufficient to support the outstanding principal do not result in a specific allowance for loan losses. Included in impaired loans at December 31, 2017 were thirteen TDRs totaling $3.1 million for which the collateral is sufficient to support the outstanding principal, five of which were in accruing status. In addition, there were no TDRs at December 31, 2017 that included a commitment to lend additional funds at December 31, 2017.

There was one TDR agreement entered into during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. There were eight TDR agreements entered into during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. There were eight

TDR agreements entered into during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. The following table presents an analysis of the Company’s TDR agreements entered into during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Troubled Debt Restructurings for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2017

 
   Number of
Contracts
   Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
   Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
 

Residential real estate

   1    153    124 

Troubled Debt Restructurings for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2016

 
   Number of
Contracts
   Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
   Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial and industrial

   2   $2,468   $2,468 

CRE owner occupied

   1    22    22 

Residential real estate

   5    906    913 

The following tables present information regarding the types of concessions granted on loans that were restructured during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Troubled Debt Restructurings for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2017

Number of
Contracts
Concession Granted

Residential real estate

1Principal repayment terms.

Troubled Debt Restructurings for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2016

Number of
Contracts
Concession Granted

Commercial and industrial

2Rate reduction and principal repayment terms.

CRE owner occupied

1Principal repayment terms.

Residential real estate

2Principal repayment terms.

Residential real estate

1Forgiveness of debt

Residential real estate

2Rate reduction and principal repayment terms.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not have any TDR agreements that had subsequently defaulted that were entered into within the respective preceding twelve months. There were five TDRs in accrual status as of December 31, 2017.

The following tables present the Company’s distribution of risk ratings loan portfolio, segregated by class, as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:

Credit Quality Indicators

As of December 31, 2017

 
  Commercial  Consumer    
  Commercial
and
industrial
  CRE
owner
occupied
  CRE non-
owner
occupied
  Land and
development
  Home
equity
lines of
credit
  Home
equity
term loans
  Residential
real estate
  Other  Total 

Grade:

         

Pass

 $264,856  $235,457  $710,692  $76,775  $94,922  $6,976  $176,972   1,941  $1,568,591 

Special Mention

                           

Substandard

  1,794   1,432   452      53   58   2,883      6,672 

Doubtful

                           
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $266,650  $ 236,889  $ 711,144  $76,775  $ 94,975  $7,034  $ 179,855  $ 1,941  $ 1,575,263 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Credit Quality Indicators

As of December 31, 2016

 
  Commercial  Consumer    
  Commercial
and
industrial
  CRE
owner
occupied
  CRE non-
owner
occupied
  Land and
development
  Home
equity
lines of
credit
  Home
equity
term loans
  Residential
real estate
  Other  Total 

Grade:

         

Pass

 $233,907  $229,635  $742,146  $67,165  $110,377  $9,032  $208,460  $2,357  $1,603,079 

Special Mention

                           

Substandard

  2,039   1,713   516         72   2,414   85   6,839 

Doubtful

                           
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $235,946  $ 231,348  $ 742,662  $67,165  $ 110,377  $9,104  $ 210,874  $ 2,442  $ 1,609,918 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Credit Quality Indicators

As of December 31, 2015

 
  Commercial  Consumer    
  Commercial
and
industrial
  CRE
owner
occupied
  CRE non-
owner
occupied
  Land and
development
  Home
equity

lines of
credit
  Home
equity
term loans
  Residential
real estate
  Other  Total 

Grade:

         

Pass

 $227,220  $223,695  $625,700  $68,070  $130,401  $12,294  $247,002  $3,007  $1,537,389 

Special Mention

  2,926   2,273                     5,199 

Substandard

  535   2,223            89   2,973   101   5,921 

Doubtful

                           
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $230,681  $ 228,191  $ 625,700  $68,070  $ 130,401  $ 12,383  $ 249,975  $ 3,108  $ 1,548,509 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company’s primary tool for assessing risk when evaluating a credit in terms of its underwriting, structure, documentation and eventual collectability is a risk rating system in which the loan is assigned a numeric value. Behind each numeric category is a defined set of characteristics reflective of the particular level of risk.

The risk rating system is based on a fourteen point grade using a two-digit scale. The upper seven grades are for “pass” categories, the middle grade is for the “criticized” category, while the lower six grades represent “classified” categories which are equivalent to the guidelines utilized by the OCC.

The portfolio manager is responsible for assigning, maintaining, and documenting accurate risk ratings for all commercial loans and commercial real estate loans. The portfolio manager assigns a risk rating at the inception of the loan and adjusts the rating based on the performance of the loan. As part of the loan review process, a regional credit officer will review risk ratings for accuracy. The portfolio manager’s risk rating will also be reviewed periodically by the loan review department and the Bank’s regulators.

To calculate risk ratings in a consistent fashion, the Company uses a Risk Rating Methodology that assesses quantitative and qualitative components which include elements of the Company’s financial condition, abilities of management, position in the market, collateral and guarantor support and the impact of changing conditions. When combined with professional judgment, an overall risk rating is assigned.

The following tables present the Company’s analysis of past due loans, segregated by class of loans, as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:

   Aging of Receivables
As of December 31, 2017
 
   30-59
Days
Past

Due
   60-89
Days
Past

Due
   90 Days
Past
Due
   Total
Past
Due
   Current   Total
Financing
Receivables
   Loans 90
Days Past
Due and
Accruing
 

Commercial:

              

Commercial and industrial

  $   $   $   $   $266,650   $266,650   $ 

CRE owner occupied

   1,531        89    1,620    235,269    236,889     

CRE non-owner occupied

   38        299    337    710,807    711,144     

Land and development

                   76,775    76,775     

Consumer:

              

Home equity lines of credit

   677    105        782    94,193    94,975     

Home equity term loans

   58            58    6,976    7,034     

Residential real estate

   3,453    1,021    429    4,903    174,952    179,855     

Other

   3            3    1,938    1,941     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $  5,760   $  1,127   $  818   $  7,704   $  1,567,559   $  1,575,263   $ 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Aging of Receivables
As of December 31, 2016
 
   30-59
Days
Past

Due
   60-89
Days
Past

Due
   90 Days
Past

Due
   Total
Past
Due
   Current   Total
Financing
Receivables
   Loans 90
Days Past
Due and
Accruing
 

Commercial:

              

Commercial and industrial

  $   $   $   $   $235,946   $235,946   $ 

CRE owner occupied

           269    269    231,079    231,348     

CRE non-owner occupied

   331        185    516    742,146    742,662     

Land and development

                   67,165    67,165     

Consumer:

              

Home equity lines of credit

   367            367    110,010    110,377     

Home equity term loans

   121            121    8,983    9,104     

Residential real estate

   4,020    851    744    5,615    205,259    210,874     

Other

   59    7    85    151    2,291    2,442     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $  4,898   $  858   $  1,283   $  7,039   $  1,602,879   $  1,609,918   $ 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

  Aging of Receivables
As of December 31, 2015
 
  30-59
Days
Past

Due
  60-89
Days
Past

Due
  90 Days
Past

Due
  Total
Past

Due
  Current  Total
Financing
Receivables
  Loans 90
Days Past
Due and
Accruing
 

Commercial:

       

Commercial and industrial

 $1  $1  $228  $230  $230,451  $230,681  $ 

CRE owner occupied

  736   35   622   1,393   226,798   228,191    

CRE non-owner occupied

              625,700   625,700    

Land and development

              68,070   68,070    

Consumer:

       

Home equity lines of credit

  136   31      167   130,234   130,401    

Home equity term loans

  14         14   12,369   12,383    

Residential real estate

  3,504   1,623   911   6,038   243,937   249,975    

Other

  15   3   101   119   2,989   3,108    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $  4,406  $  1,693  $  1,862  $  7,961  $  1,540,548  $  1,548,509  $ 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

7. RESTRICTED EQUITY INVESTMENTS

The Company, through the Bank, is a member of the FRB, the FHLBNY and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank, and is required to maintain an investment in the capital stock of each. These investments are restricted in that they can only be redeemed by the issuer at par value. These securities are carried at cost and the Company did not identify any events or changes in circumstances that may have had an adverse effect on the value of the investments in accordance with FASB ASC 942, Financial Services – Depository and Lending. As of December 31, 2017, management does not believe that an impairment of these holdings exists and expects to recover the entire cost of these securities.

The Company’s restricted equity investments at December 31, 2017 and 2016 consisted of the following:

RESTRICTED EQUITY INVESTMENTS

December 31,

  2017   2016 

FRB stock

  $11,094   $9,568 

FHLBNY stock

   5,726    6,075 

Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock

   147    148 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $    16,967   $    15,791 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

8. BANK PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT

Bank properties and equipment at December 31, 2017 and 2016 consist of the following major classifications:

SUMMARY OF BANK PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT

December 31,

  2017  2016 

Land

  $6,363  $6,998 

Buildings

   22,881   23,141 

Capital lease

   8,630   8,630 

Leasehold improvements and equipment

       36,032       36,127 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total bank properties and equipment

   73,906   74,896 

Accumulated depreciation

   (46,814  (44,748
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Bank properties and equipment, net

   27,092   30,148 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $428 thousand to record land at one branch location at lower of cost or market. The Company recognized depreciation expense of $3.5 million, $3.6 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

9. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

In accordance with FASB ASC 350, the Company tests goodwill for impairment annually at year end and the current year analysis was performed at December 31, 2017. The Company has one reportable operating segment, “Community Banking,” and there are no components to this operating segment.

In performing step one of the impairment analysis as defined by FASB ASC 350, the market value assigned to the Company’s stock was based upon an acquisition value relative to recent acquisition transactions by companies in the Company’s geographic proximity and comparable size. The acquisition value is sensitive to both the fluctuation of the Company’s stock price and the stock price and equity of peer companies. The analysis resulted in an estimated Company fair value above its carrying value, and therefore the Company was deemed to have no goodwill impairment during 2017, 2016 and 2015. The total accumulated goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2017 was $89.7 million.

10. DEPOSITS

Deposits at December 31, 2017 and 2016 consist of the following major classifications:

SUMMARY OF DEPOSITS

December 31,

  2017   2016 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

  $664,318   $697,701 

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

   397,174    397,311 

Savings deposits

   245,706    241,754 

Time deposits $250,000 or less

   314,031    338,615 

Time deposits over $250,000

   28,531    28,789 

Brokered time deposits

   675    37,193 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $  1,650,435   $  1,741,363 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

A summary of time deposits at December 31, 2017 by year of maturity is as follows:

MATURITIES OF TIME DEPOSITS(1)

Years Ended December 31,

  Amount 

2018

  $248,808 

2019

   68,800 

2020

   15,493 

2021

   1,258 

2022

   4,595 

Thereafter

   4,282 
  

 

 

 

Total

  $  343,236 
  

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts include brokered time deposits.

A summary of interest expense on deposits for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

SUMMARY OF INTEREST EXPENSE

Years Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 

Savings deposits

  $841   $767   $467 

Time deposits

   4,190    3,684    3,454 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   1,638    1,507    1,416 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $  6,669   $  5,958   $  5,337 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

11. ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF NEW YORK

At December 31, 2017, the Company had fixed-rate advances from the FHLBNY of $85.2 million, with maturity dates through 2022 and interest rates ranging from 1.60% to 5.87%. These advances require monthly interest payments and balloon principal payments at maturity. At December 31, 2016, the Company had fixed-rate advances from the FHLBNY of $85.4 million, with maturity dates through 2022 and interest rates ranging from 1.60% to 5.87%. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 2.01% and 2.02%, respectively. Interest expense on advances from the FHLBNY was $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in interest on funds borrowed on the consolidated statements of operations.

The contractual maturities of the Company’s fixed-rate advances from the FHLBNY at December 31, 2016 were as follows:

CONTRACTUAL MATURITIES OF ADVANCES FROM THE FHLBNY

Years Ended December 31,

  Amount 

2018

   214 

2019

   25,000 

2020

   15,000 

2021

    

2022

    

Thereafter

   45,000 
  

 

 

 

Total

  $  85,214 
  

 

 

 

12. JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES HELD BY TRUSTS THAT ISSUED CAPITAL DEBT

The Company has established Issuer Trusts that have issued guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in the Company’s junior subordinated debentures. These Issuer Trusts are variable interest entities under FASB ASC 810-10, Consolidation (“FASB ASC 810-10”).

In accordance with FASB ASC 810-10, all the Issuer Trusts outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are deconsolidated. The junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to the Issuer Trusts at December 31, 2017 and 2016 of $51.5 million and $92.8 million, respectively, are reflected as junior subordinated debentures in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company records interest expense on the corresponding debentures in its consolidated statements of operations. The Company also recorded the common capital securities of $1.5 million and $2.8 million issued by the Issuer Trusts in other assets in its consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following is a summary of the outstanding capital securities issued by each Issuer Trust and the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to each Issuer Trust as of December 31, 2017.

SUMMARY OF CAPITAL SECURITIES AND JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

December 31, 2017

 

Capital Securities

 Junior Subordinated Debentures

Issuer Trust

 

Issuance Date

 Stated
Value
  

Distribution Rate

 Principal
Amount
  

Maturity

 

Redeemable
Beginning

Sun Statutory Trust VII

   3-mo LIBOR plus   
 January 17, 2006  30,000  1.35%  30,928  March 15, 2036 March 15, 2011

Sun Capital Trust VII

   3-mo LIBOR plus   
 April 19, 2007  10,000  1.53%  10,310  June 30, 2037 June 30, 2012

Sun Capital Trust VIII

   3-mo LIBOR plus   
 July 5, 2007  10,000  1.39%  10,310  October 1, 2037 October 1, 2012
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
  $  50,000   $  51,548   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

As of December 31, 2017, each of the capital securities is eligible for redemption. The Company maintains the right to call these securities in the future on the respective payment anniversary dates. The Company redeemed $40 million of its outstanding trust preferred securities during 2017. Specifically, the securities redeemed were: (i) $15.0 million of the floating rate capital securities issued by Sun Capital Trust V, which were called for redemption on May 23, 2017 and redeemed on June 30, 2017, and (ii) $25.0 million of the floating rate capital securities issued by Sun Capital Trust VI, which were called for redemption on May 23, 2017 and redeemed on July 23, 2017. The trust preferred securities were redeemed, along with the common securities issued by Sun Capital Trust V and Sun Capital Trust VI and held by the Company, as a result of the concurrent

redemption of the Company’s outstanding junior subordinated debentures held by Sun Capital Trust V and Sun Capital Trust VI. The redemptions were completed pursuant to the optional prepayment provisions of the respective indentures. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Bank accelerated $415 thousand of deferred issuance costs related to these two tranches of trust preferred securities.

The Company’s capital securities are deconsolidated in accordance with GAAP and qualify as Tier 1 capital under federal regulatory guidelines. These instruments are subject to a 25% capital limitation under risk-based capital guidelines developed by the FRB. Under FRB rules, restricted core capital elements, which are qualifying trust preferred securities, qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock (and related surplus) and certain minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, are limited in the aggregate to no more than 25% of a bank holding company’s core capital elements (including restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. However, under the Dodd-Frank Act, bank holding companies are prohibited from including in their Tier 1 capital hybrid debt and equity securities, including trust preferred securities, issued on or after May 19, 2010. Any such instruments issued before May 19, 2010 by a bank holding company, such as the Company, with total consolidated assets of less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009, may continue to be included as Tier 1 capital (subject to the 25% limitation). The portion that exceeds the 25% capital limitation qualifies as Tier 2, or supplementary capital of the Company. See Note 19 for additional information on capital limitations.

The Issuer Trusts are wholly owned unconsolidated subsidiaries of the Company and have no independent operations. The obligations of Issuer Trusts are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company. The debentures are unsecured and rank subordinate and junior in right of payment to all indebtedness, liabilities and obligations of the Company. Interest on the debentures is cumulative and payable in arrears. Proceeds from any redemption of debentures would cause a mandatory redemption of capital securities having an aggregate liquidation amount equal to the principal amount of debentures redeemed.

The interest rates on the junior subordinated debentures reset on a quarterly basis and interest payments are made on a quarterly basis. The three-month LIBOR rate at December 31, 2017 was 1.70%. The Company maintains sufficient cash to fund junior subordinated debenture interest obligations. Cash balances at the Company totaled $10.7 million at December 31, 2017. Should a dividend from the Bank be necessary to fund the junior subordinated debenture interest obligations of the holding company, prior approval by the OCC would be required. See Note 19 for additional information on dividend limitations.

13. STOCK-BASED INCENTIVE PLANS

In March 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Sun Bancorp, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The purpose of the 2015 Plan is to give the Company a competitive advantage in attracting, retaining and motivating officers, employees, directors and consultants who will contribute toward the growth, profitability and success of the Company by providing stock-based incentives that offer an opportunity to participate in the Company’s future performance and to align the interests of such officers, employees, directors and/or consultants with those of the shareholders of the Company.

The 2015 Plan, which was approved by shareholders in May 2015, became effective in May 2015, at which time the Company ceased new grants under the 2014 Performance Plan, the 2010 Plan, and the 2004 Plan (each as defined below and collectively, the “Prior Plans”). Any awards outstanding under the Prior Plans remain in full force and effect under such plans according to their respective terms. The 2015 Plan authorizes the issuance of 1,400,000 shares of common stock pursuant to awards that may be granted in the form of Options and Stock Awards. Under the 2015 Plan, Options expire ten years after the date of grant, unless terminated earlier under the option terms. For both Options and Stock Awards, a Committee of non-employee directors has the authority to determine the conditions upon which the Options or Stock Awards granted will vest. At December 31, 2017, there were 123,739 Options and 286,812 Stock Awards granted under the 2015 Plan. There are 117,680 Options and 66,363 Stock Awards outstanding under the 2015 Plan at December 31, 2017.

In September 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a Stock-Based Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan authorized the issuance of 980,000 shares of common stock pursuant to awards that

could be granted in the form of Options to purchase common stock and Stock Awards of common stock. The maximum number of Stock Awards could not exceed 280,000 shares. Under the 2010 Plan, Options expired 10 years after the date of grant, unless terminated earlier under the Option terms. For both Options and Stock Awards, a Committee of non-employee directors had the authority to determine the conditions upon which the Options granted will vest. At December 31, 2017, there were 339,553 Options and 6,000 Stock Awards outstanding under the 2010 Plan. At December 31, 2017, there were no shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2010 Plan as it was terminated in May 2015 with the adoption of the 2015 Plan.

The 2004 Stock Plan, as amended in 2009, (the “2004 Plan”), authorized the issuance of 500,085 shares of common stock pursuant to awards that could have been granted in the form of Options to purchase common stock and Stock Awards of common stock. Options previously issued under the 2004 Stock Plan expired ten years after the date of grant, unless terminated earlier under the Option terms. For both Options and Stock Awards, a Committee of non-employee directors had the authority to determine the conditions upon which the Options granted would vest. There were no Stock Awards or Options issued from the 2004 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. There are 92,187 Options and no Stock Awards outstanding under the 2004 Plan at December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, there were no shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2004 Plan as it was terminated in May 2015 with the adoption of the 2015 Plan.

There are no equity compensation plans providing for the issuance of shares of the Company which were not approved by the shareholders.

Total options outstanding under the 2004 Plan, 2010 Plan and 2015 Plan are as follows:

SUMMARY OF STOCK OPTIONS GRANTED AND OUTSTANDING

     Incentive       Nonqualified         Total     

Options granted and outstanding:

      

December 31, 2017 at prices ranging from $14.25

to $53.80 per share

   150,603    398,817    549,420 

December 31, 2016 at prices ranging from $14.25

to $87.45 per share

   169,838    402,045    571,883 

December 31, 2015 at prices ranging from $14.25

to $87.45 per share

   188,525    320,804    509,329 

Activity in the stock option plans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:

SUMMARY OF STOCK OPTION ACTIVITY

Years Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 
   Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

Options outstanding, beginning of year

   571,883  $22.37    509,329  $23.82    318,901  $28.34 

Granted

          123,739   21.08    222,059   18.92 

Exercised

   (5,815  18.00    (3,879  18.38    (811  15.20 

Forfeited

   (4,906  22.17    (54,349  30.42    (20,454  17.47 

Expired

   11,742  59.78    (2,957  76.65    (10,366  64.17 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Options outstanding, end of year

   549,420  $21.62    571,883  $22.37    509,329  $23.82 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Options exercisable, end of year

   293,507  $23.36    234,564  $26.56    164,384  $33.93 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Options vested or expected to vest(1)

   415,684  $19.65    413,641  $19.65    480,995  $24.28 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Includes vested shares and nonvested shares after a forfeiture rate assumption, which is based upon historical data, is applied.

The weighted average grant date fair value per share of Options granted during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $5.90 and $6.16, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of Options outstanding at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $2.2 million, $3.1 million and $615 thousand, respectively.

During 2017, 2016 and 2015, 5,815, 3,879 and 811 Options were exercised for total proceeds of $105 thousand, $71 thousand and $15 thousand, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of Options exercisable at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $1.0 million, $941 thousand and $107 thousand, respectively.

A summary of the Company’s nonvested Options at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is presented in the following table:

SUMMARY OF NONVESTED OPTION ACTIVITY

Years Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 
   Number
of Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
   Number
of Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
    Number
of Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Nonvested Options outstanding,

beginning of year

   337.319  $6.16    344,945  $7.24    156,917  $11.68 

Granted

          123,739   5.90    222,059   6.16 

Vested

   (76,817  6.34    (111,635  9.20    (13,577  7.96 

Forfeited

   (4,589  5.79    (19,730  6.38    (20,454  7.30 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Nonvested Options outstanding, end of

year

   255,913  $6.11    337,319  $6.16    344,945  $7.24 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

At December 31, 2017, there was $766 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to Options granted under the stock option plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years.

A summary of the Company’s nonvested Stock Awards at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is presented in the following table:

SUMMARY OF NONVESTED STOCK AWARD ACTIVITY(1)

Years Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 
   Number
of Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
   Number
of Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
   Number
  of Shares  
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Nonvested Stock Awards outstanding,

beginning of year

   254,976  $20.18    279,964  $14.98    248,654  $14.22 

Issued

   103,981   26.14    122,262   20.18    60,569   19.22 

Vested

   (282,524  21.34    (135,236  19.96    (24,959  17.53 

Forfeited

   (4,070  22.94    (12,014  20.08    (4,300  15.90 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Nonvested Stock Awards outstanding,

end of year

   72,363  $24.05    254,976  $20.18    279,964  $14.98 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

During 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company issued 103,981, 122,262, and 60,569 shares of Stock Awards, respectively, that were valued at $2.7 million, $2.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, at the time these Stock Awards were granted. The value of these shares is based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. At December 31, 2017, there was $1.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these Stock Awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.1 years. The

total compensation expense recognized on Stock Awards during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $5.0 million, $1.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

14. BENEFITS

The Company has established a 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for all qualified employees. Employees are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan following completion of 90 days of service and attaining age 21. Pursuant to the 401(k) Plan, employees can contribute up to 75% of their compensation to the maximum allowed by law. The Company will match 100% of the first 3% and 50% of the next 2% of the base contribution that an employee contributes. The Company’s match is immediately vested and paid at the end of the year. For the 2017 year, the Company processed the annual match on January 10, 2018 for a total of $665 thousand.

The Company has established the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan, a deferred stock compensation plan for members of its Board of Directors (the “Directors’ Plan”). The Directors’ Plan provides Directors with the opportunity to defer, for tax planning purposes, receipt of all or a portion of any Sun Bancorp, Inc. stock earned as compensation. The Directors’ Plan balance as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

The Company, from time to time, may be a defendant in legal proceedings related to the conduct of its business. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, believes that the liabilities, if any, arising from such litigation and claims will not be material to the consolidated financial statements.

Letters of Credit. In the normal course of business, the Company has various commitments and contingent liabilities, such as customers’ letters of credit (including standby letters of credit of $9.8 million and $10.1 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively), which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

Reserve for Unfunded Commitments. The Company maintains a reserve for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit which is reported in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition consistent with FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments. The Company records estimated losses inherent with unfunded loan commitments in accordance with FASB ASC 450, Contingencies, and estimated future obligations under letters of credit in accordance with FASB ASC 460, Guarantees. The methodology used to determine the adequacy of this reserve is integrated in the Company’s process for establishing the allowance for loan losses and considers the probability of future losses and obligations that may be incurred under these off-balance sheet agreements. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $380 thousand and $611 thousand, respectively. Management believes this reserve level is sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to these commitments.

Reserves for loans sold. As of December 31, 2017, the Company maintains a reserve for estimated losses inherent with residential mortgage loans sold to third-party purchasers with recourse and potential repair requests for guaranteed loans sold to the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) in accordance with FASB ASC 450, Contingencies. This reserve is determined based upon the probability of future losses which is calculated using historical Company and industry loss data. The recourse reserve for these loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and is reported in other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition. The Company did not repurchase any loans during the year ended 2017 and made no recourse payments. Management believes this reserve level is sufficient to address potential recourse exposure.

Leases.

The following is a schedule of the Company’s future minimum lease payments under capital leases as of December 31, 2017:

FUTURE MINIMUM LEASE PAYMENTS UNDER OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASES

Years Ended December 31,

  Amount 

2018

  $839 

2019

   839 

2020

   863 

2021

   910 

2022

   910 

Thereafter

   3,460 
  

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

  $7,820 

Less: Amount representing interest

   1,961 
  

 

 

 

Present value of minimum lease payment, net

  $        5,859 
  

 

 

 

The following table shows future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more at December 31, 2017. Future minimum receipts under sub-lease agreements are deemed not material.

FUTURE MINIMUM PAYMENTS UNDER NONCANCELABLE OPERATING LEASES

Years Ended December 31,

  Amount 

2018

  $2,536 

2019

   1,725 

2020

   1,650 

2021

   1,457 

2022

   1,414 

Thereafter

   1,015 
  

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

  $        9,797 
  

 

 

 

Rental expense, which is included in occupancy expense on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for all leases was $2.7 million, $2.9 million and $4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

During 2016, the Company identified three leased facilities, respectively, which have been either fully or partially vacated as a part of the implementation of the Company’s comprehensive restructuring plan. As a result, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized net charges of $611 thousand for leased office vacancy costs. For each of these leased facilities, a discounted cash flow analysis was performed over the remaining life of the lease inclusive of a sub-lease assumption based on current market rates, if applicable. At December 31, 2017, the Company had a liability of $1.6 million associated with these lease vacancy costs included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

16. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Derivative financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, interest rate, market and credit risk. The Company manages these risks as part of its asset and liability management process and through credit policies and procedures. The Company seeks to minimize counterparty credit risk by establishing credit limits and collateral agreements. The Company utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to enhance its ability to manage interest rate risk that exists as part of its ongoing business operations. In general, the derivative transactions entered into by the Company fall into one of two types: a fair value hedge of a specific fixed-rate loan agreement and an economic hedge of a derivative offering to a Bank customer. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

Fair Value Hedges - Interest Rate Swaps. The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to hedge interest rate risk. The designated hedged items are subordinated notes related to commercial loans that provide a fixed interest receipt for the Company. The interest rate risk is the uncertainty of future interest rate levels and the impact of changes in rates on the fair value of the loans. The hedging of interest rate risk is intended to reduce the volatility of the fair value of the loans due to changes in the interest rate market.

The Company previously entered into interest rate swaps with a counterparty whereby the Company makes payments based on a fixed interest rate and receives payments from the counterparty based on a floating interest rate, both calculated based on the principal amount of the underlying subordinated note, without the exchange of the underlying principal. The Company no longer enters into these interest rate swap transactions, the last of which occurred in August 2007. The interest rate swaps are designated as fair value hedges under FASB ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging (“FASB ASC 815”). The critical terms assessed by the Company for each hedge of subordinated notes include the notional amounts of the swap compared to the principal amount of the notes, expiration/maturity dates, benchmark interest rate, prepayment terms and cash payment dates. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the total outstanding notional amount of these swaps was $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively. For each of these swap agreements, the floating rate is based on the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) paid on the first day of the month which matches the interest payment date on each subordinated note. The expiration dates for these swap agreements range from November 1, 2019 to August 1, 2022 and are consistent with the underlying subordinated note maturities and the swaps had a fair value of $0 at inception. At hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, conditions supporting hedge effectiveness are evaluated. The Company believes that all conditions required in paragraphASC 815-20-25-104 have been met, as all terms of the subordinated note and the interest rate swap match. Because the Company’s evaluations have concluded that the critical terms of the subordinated notes and the interest rate swaps meet the criteria outlined in ASC 815-20-25-104, the “short-cut” method of accounting is applied, which assumes there is no ineffectiveness of a hedging arrangement’s ability to hedge risk as changes in the interest rate component of the swaps’ fair value are expected to exactly offset the corresponding changes in the fair value of the underlying subordinated notes, as described above. Because the hedging arrangement is considered perfectly effective, changes to the underlying benchmark interest rates considered in the valuation of these instruments do not result in a net impact to earnings; however, there may be fair value adjustments related to credit quality variations between counterparties, which may impact earnings as required by FASB ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“FASB ASC 820”). The fair value adjustments related to credit quality were not material as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

The following tables provide information pertaining to interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges under FASB ASC 815 at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

SUMMARY OF INTEREST RATE SWAPS DESIGNATED AS FAIR VALUE HEDGES

December 31,

  2017   2016 

Balance Sheet Location

  Notional   Fair Value   Notional   Fair Value 

Other liabilities

  $      1,247   $      (101)   $      1,468   $      (165) 

SUMMARY OF INTEREST RATE SWAPS COMPONENTS

December 31,

  2017  2016 

Weighted average pay rate

           7.23          7.22

Weighted average receive rate

   1.72  1.73

Weighted average maturity in years

   2.35   2.92 

Customer Derivatives – Interest Rate Swaps/Floors. The Company enters into interest rate swaps that allow our commercial loan customers to effectively convert a variable-rate commercial loan agreement to a fixed-rate commercial loan agreement. Under these agreements, the Company enters into a variable-rate loan agreement

with a customer in addition to an interest rate swap agreement, which serves to effectively swap the customer’s variable-rate into a fixed-rate. The Company then enters into a corresponding swap agreement with a third party in order to economically hedge its exposure through the customer agreement. The interest rate swaps with both the customers and third parties are not designated as hedges under FASB ASC 815 and are marked to market through earnings. As the interest rate swaps are structured to offset each other, changes to the underlying benchmark interest rates considered in the valuation of these instruments do not result in an impact to earnings; however, there may be fair value adjustments related to credit quality variations between counterparties, which may impact earnings as required by FASB ASC 820. The Company recognized $17 thousand, $83 thousand and $88 thousand in negative fair value adjustment charges during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These balances included swap termination fees of $13 thousand, $117 thousand and $2 thousand during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. These amounts are included in the derivative credit valuation adjustment in the consolidated statements of operations as a reduction to other income.

SUMMARY OF INTEREST RATE SWAPS NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS

December 31,

  2017  2016 

Balance Sheet Location

  Notional  Fair Value  Notional  Fair Value 

Other assets

  $    25,888  $    517  $    45,236  $2,077 

Other liabilities

   (25,888  (518  (45,236  (2,087

The Company has an International Swaps and Derivatives Association agreement with a third party that requires a minimum dollar transfer amount upon a margin call. This requirement is dependent on certain specified credit measures. The amount of collateral posted with the third party at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2.3 million and $13.8 million, respectively. The amount of collateral posted with the third party is deemed to be sufficient to collateralize both the fair market value change as well as any additional amounts that may be required as a result of a change in the specified credit measures. The aggregate fair value of all derivative financial instruments in a liability position with credit measure contingencies and entered into with the third party was $518 thousand and $2.0 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

17. INCOME TAXES

The income tax (benefit) expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 consists of the following:

SUMMARY OF INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE

Years Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015 

Current

  $466  $138  $73 

Deferred

   (1,903  (52,533  1,124 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax (benefit) expense

  $    (1,437 $    (52,395 $    1,197 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Items that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax accounts at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

DETAILS OF DEFERRED TAX ASSET, NET

December 31,

  2017  2016 

Deferred tax asset:

   

Allowance for loan losses

  $4,061  $6,598 

Impairments realized on investment securities

   337   490 

Fixed assets

   1,542   2,502 

Net operating loss carry forwards

   75,484   110,271 

Unrealized loss on investment securities

   1,295   1,774 

Alternative minimum tax credits

   2,325   2,145 

Other

   4.953   6,315 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax asset before valuation allowance

   89,997       130,095 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Less: valuation allowance

   (32,317  (73,186

Deferred tax liability:

   

Goodwill amortization

   3,424   3,854 

Deferred loan costs

   530   1,193 

Other

   143   289 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liability

   4,097   5,336 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

  $    53,583  $51,573 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against their deferred tax asset based on an assessment of the amount of the deferred tax asset that is “more likely than not” to be realized. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

Management assesses the valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets at each reporting date. The determination of whether a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is appropriate is subject to considerable judgment and requires the evaluation of positive and negative evidence that can be objectively verified. Consideration must be given to all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including, as applicable, the future reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income forecasts exclusive of the reversal of temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In estimating taxes, management assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory, judicial, and regulatory guidance.

In 2010, the Company established a valuation allowance for substantially all of the deferred tax assets of the Bank, primarily due to the realization of significant losses driven by charges to the provision for loan losses, a three-year cumulative loss position as of the end of year 2010, and uncertainty regarding the amount of future taxable income that the Bank could forecast. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2016, based on the assessment of all positive and negative evidence, management concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to conclude that it was more likely than not that the Bank would realize the benefits associated with deferred tax assets. Accordingly, the Company maintained a valuation allowance for substantially all of the Bank’s deferred tax assets.

The Company has performed a continuing evaluation of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. The Company concluded that, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income within the applicable net operating loss carry-forward periods to realize a portion of its deferred tax assets. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company reversed of

a portion of the valuation allowance established against the deferred tax assets of the Company. This reversal was determined based upon increased earnings estimates from the previous year and resulted in the recognition of an income tax benefit of $31.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company did not factor in any growth in earnings to forecast its future profitability given the stable results in previous quarters. The Company previously reversed a portion of its valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of 2016, resulting in the recognition of an income tax benefit of $53.7 million. This conclusion was reached after weighing all of the evidence and determining that the positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence. This conclusion, and the resulting partial reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, is based upon consideration of a number of factors, including the Company’s completion of twelve consecutive quarters of profitability, its demonstrated ability to meet or exceed budgets, its forecast of future profitability under multiple scenarios that support the partial utilization of net operating loss carryforwards prior to their expiration between 2018 through 2036 and improvements in credit risk management and credit quality measures that have resulted in reduced credit risk and improve management’s ability to forecast future credit losses, among others. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company was no longer in a three-year cumulative pre-tax loss position.

In addition, as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the federal corporate tax rate was reduced from 35% to 21%. This resulted in the Company recording a write-down of its deferred tax asset by $26.0 million, which was reflected as additional tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2017. The impact of the valuation allowance reversal at December 31, 2017 was calculated after this write-down was recorded by the Company.

The Company had $254.4 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2017 of which $27.2 million will expire in 2030, $112.5 million will expire in 2031, $50.0 million will expire in 2032, $25.7 million will expire in 2033, $38.6 million will expire in 2034 and $420 thousand will expire in 2035. The Bank also has $310.4 million of state net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2017 of which $23.1 million expire in 2029, $74.7 million expire in 2030, $109.8 million expire in 2031, $45.2 million expire in 2032, $22.3 million expire in 2033 and $35.3 million expire in 2034. The Company’s alternative minimum tax credits of $2.3 million at December 31, 2017 have no expiration date.

At December 31, 2017, the Company expects to realize approximately $45.1 million of gross deferred tax assets associated with the Bank’s net operating loss carryforwards prior to their expiration periods. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company expects to realize approximately $12.4 million of the gross deferred tax assets attributable to temporary differences or tax credit carry-forwards that have no expiration date. As a result of the partial reversal and the impact of the corporate tax rate change, the Company’s net deferred tax assets amounted to $53.6 million as of December 31, 2017, net of a valuation allowance of $32.3 million.

Management’s conclusion that it more likely than not that $53.6 million of net deferred tax assets will be realized is based, among other things, on management’s estimate of future taxable income. Management’s estimate of future taxable income is based on objectively verifiable evidence of future profitability. If events are identified that affect the Company’s ability to utilize its deferred tax assets, the analysis will be updated to determine if any adjustments to the valuation allowance are required. If actual results differ significantly from the current estimates of future taxable income or if federal or state tax rates are reduced, the remaining valuation allowance may need to be increased. Such an increase could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Better than expected results and continued positive results and trends could result in further releases to the deferred tax valuation allowance, any such decreases could have a material positive effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The ability to recognize the remaining deferred tax assets that continue to be subject to a valuation allowance will be evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine if there are any significant events that would affect the ability to utilize these deferred tax assets.

The provision for income taxes differs from that computed at the statutory rate as follows:

RECONCILIATION OF FEDERAL STATUTORY INCOME TAX

Years Ended December 31,

 2017  2016  2015 
  Amount  %  Amount  %  Amount  % 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 $  11,140   $      9,022   $    11,417  

Tax computed at statutory rate

  3,899   35.0  3,067           34.0  3,996           35.0
Increase (decrease) in charge resulting from:      

State taxes, net of federal benefit

  884   7.9   72   0.8   804   7.0 

Tax exempt interest, net

  (8  (0.1  (10  (0.1  (309  (2.7

BOLI

  (684  (6.1  (657  (7.3  (715  (6.3

Valuation allowance

  (31,564  (283.3  (55,003  (609.6  (3,853  (33.7

Corporate tax rate change

  26,049       233.8             

Other, net

  (13  (0.1  136   1.5   1,274   11.2
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total income tax (benefit) expense

 $(1,437  (12.9)%  $(52,395  (580.7)%  $1,197   10.5
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

FASB ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial statement benefit is recognized. The minimum threshold is defined in ASC 740 as a tax position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740 was applied to all existing tax positions upon initial adoption. There was no liability for uncertain tax positions and no known unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2017 or 2016.

The Company recognizes, when applicable, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes in the results of operations. As of December 31, 2017, the 2012 through 2016 tax years were subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and to state examination. There are currently no IRS examinations in process.

18. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, net of any treasury shares, during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, net of any treasury shares, after consideration of the potential dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, based upon the treasury stock method using an average market price for the period.

Earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were calculated as follows:

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE COMPUTATION

Years Ended December 31,

 2017  2016  2015 

Net income available to common shareholders

 $12,577  $61,417  $10,220 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Average common shares outstanding

  19,060,790   18,843,077   18,648,339 

Net effect of dilutive shares

  169,346   90,253   61,820 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Dilutive common shares outstanding

    19,230,136     18,933,330     18,710,159 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share – basic

 $0.66  $3.26  $0.55 

Earnings per share – diluted

 $0.65  $3.24  $0.55 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

19. REGULATORY MATTERS

The Company is subject to risk-based capital guidelines adopted by the FRB for bank holding companies. The Bank is also subject to similar capital requirements adopted by the OCC. The federal bank regulatory agencies have established quantitative measures to ensure that minimum thresholds for Total Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Leverage (Tier 1 Capital divided by average assets) ratios (set forth in the table below) are maintained.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued the Final Capital Rules. The Final Capital Rules revised the quantity and quality of required minimum risk-based and leverage capital requirements applicable to the Bank and the Company, consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act and the Basel III capital standards. The Final Capital Rules revised the quantity and quality of capital required by (1) establishing a new minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets; (2) increasing the minimum capital ratio from 4.0% to 6.0% of risk-weighted assets; (3) maintaining the minimum total capital ratio of 8.0% of risk-weighted assets; and (4) maintaining a minimum Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 4.0%.

Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s consolidated financial statements.

Furthermore, the Final Capital Rules added a requirement for a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets (“the Conservation Buffer”) to be applied to the common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the total capital ratio. The required minimum Conservation Buffer began to be phased in incrementally, starting at 0.625% on January 1, 2016, increased to 1.25% on January 1, 2017, and will increase to 1.875% on January 1, 2018 and 2.5% on January 1, 2019. If a bank’s or bank holding company’s Conservation Buffer is less than the required minimum and its net income for the four calendar quarters preceding the applicable calendar quarter, net of any capital distributions and associated tax effects not already reflected in net income (“Eligible Retained Income”) is negative, it would be prohibited from making capital distributions or certain discretionary cash bonus payments to executive officers. As a result, under the Final Capital Rules, should we fail to maintain the Conservation Buffer we would be subject to limits on, and in the event we have negative Eligible Retained Income for any four consecutive calendar quarters, we would be prohibited in, our ability to obtain capital distributions from the Bank.

The following table provides both the Company’s and the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

REGULATORY CAPITAL LEVELS

  Actual  For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
  Minimum Capital
Requirement with
Conservation Buffer (1)
  To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions(2)
 
  Amount  Ratio      Amount          Ratio          Amount          Ratio          Amount          Ratio     

December 31, 2017

        
Total risk-based capital (torisk-weighted assets):        

Sun Bancorp, Inc.

 $322,688   20.32 $127,018   8.00  $146,865   9.25  N/A  

Sun National Bank

  315,091   19.84   127,023   8.00   146,870   9.25  $158,778   10.00
Tier 1 common equity capital ratio (to risk-weighted assets):        

Sun Bancorp, Inc.

  266,766   16.80   71,448   4.50   91,294   5.75   N/A  

Sun National Bank

  300,642   18.93   71,450   4.50   91,297   5.75   103,206   6.50 
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):        

Sun Bancorp, Inc.

  308,239   19.41   95,264   6.00   115,110   7.25   N/A  

Sun National Bank

  300,642   18.93   95,267   6.00   115,114   7.25   127,023   8.00 

Leverage capital:

        

Sun Bancorp, Inc.

  308,239   14.92   82,628   4.00   N/A    N/A  

Sun National Bank

  300,642   14.55   82,636   4.00   N/A    103,294   5.00 

December 31, 2016

        
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):        

Sun Bancorp, Inc.

 $  354,078   21.63 $130,929   8.00  $  141,157   8.625  N/A  

Sun National Bank

  324,196   19.85   130,664   8.00   140,872   8.625  $163,330   10.00
Tier 1 common equity capital ratio (to risk-weighted assets):        

Sun Bancorp, Inc.

  262,386   16.03   73,647   4.50   83,876   5.125   N/A  

Sun National Bank

  308,043   18.86   73,498   4.50   83,707   5.125   106,164   6.50 
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):        

Sun Bancorp, Inc.

  309,910   18.94   98,196   6.00   108,425   6.625   N/A  

Sun National Bank

  308,043   18.86   97,998   6.00   108,206   6.625   130,664   8.00 

Leverage capital:

        

Sun Bancorp, Inc.

  309,910   14.57   85,092   4.00   N/A    N/A  

Sun National Bank

  308,043   14.50   84,959   4.00   N/A    106,199   5.00 

(1)

Conservation Buffer of 1.25% became effective as of January 1, 2017.

(2)

Not applicable for bank holding companies.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company and the Bank exceeded the required ratios for classification as “well capitalized.”

On April 15, 2010, the Bank entered into the OCC Agreement which contained requirements to develop and implement a profitability and capital plan that would provide for the maintenance of adequate capital to support the Bank’s risk profile.

The Bank also agreed to: (a) adopt and implement a program to protect the Bank’s interest in criticized or classified assets; (b) review and revise the Bank’s loan review program; (c) adopt and implement a program for the maintenance of an adequate allowance for loan losses; and (d) revise the Bank’s credit administration policies. The Bank also agreed that its brokered deposits will not exceed 6.0% of its total deposits unless approved by the OCC. Effective January 21, 2016, the OCC terminated the OCC Agreement and the individual minimum capital requirement to which the Bank was subject and the requirements noted above were eliminated.

Separately, on January 21, 2016, without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, the Bank entered into a Consent Order with the OCC to pay a $25,000 civil money penalty in connection with various deficiencies identified by the OCC in the mortgage banking practices of Sun Home Loans, a former division of the Bank which was closed in July 2014 when the Bank exited the residential mortgage lending business as part of a comprehensive strategic restructuring. The identified deficiencies occurred from July 2011 through September 2013.

In addition, the Company had been required to seek the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank before paying interest, principal or other sums on trust preferred securities or any related subordinated debentures, declaring or paying cash dividends or receiving dividends from the Bank, repurchasing outstanding stock or incurring indebtedness. The Company also was required to submit, and periodically update, a capital plan, a profit plan and cash flow projections, as well as other progress reports to the Federal Reserve Bank. The foregoing requirements were terminated by the Federal Reserve Bank in October 2016.

The Bank is subject to various statutory and regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay dividends to the Company. All national banks are limited in the payment of dividends without the approval of the OCC of a total amount not to exceed the net income for that year to date plus the retained net income for the preceding two years. Federal law also prohibits national banks from paying dividends that would be greater than the bank’s undivided profits after deducting statutory bad debt in excess of the bank’s allowance for loan losses. Due to the Bank’s history of losses and retained deficit as of December 31, 2016, the Bank may not pay dividends; however, federal law permits the Bank to distribute cash or other assets to the Company through a reduction of capital, subject to approval by the OCC. At such time as the retained deficit is eliminated, any proposed dividends from the Bank to the Company are subject to regulatory approval until such time as net income for the current year combined with the prior two years is sufficient. Under FDICIA, an insured depository institution such as the Bank is prohibited from making capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become “undercapitalized” (as such term is used in the FDICIA). Payment of dividends by the Bank also may be restricted at any time at the discretion of the OCC if it deems the payment to constitute an unsafe and unsound banking practice.

FDIC assessment expense of $642 thousand, $1.0 million and $3.1 million was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company’s capital securities are deconsolidated in accordance with GAAP and qualify as Tier 1 capital under federal regulatory guidelines. These instruments are subject to a 25% capital limitation under risk-based capital guidelines developed by the FRB. Under FRB rules, restricted core capital elements, which are qualifying trust preferred securities, qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock (and related surplus) and certain minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, are limited in the aggregate to no more than 25% of a bank holding company’s core capital elements (including restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. However, under the Dodd-Frank Act, bank holding companies are prohibited from including in their Tier 1 capital hybrid debt and equity securities, including trust preferred securities, issued on or after May 19, 2010. Any such instruments issued before May 19, 2010 by a bank holding company, such as the Company, with total consolidated assets of less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009, may continue to be included as Tier 1 capital (subject to the 25% limitation). At December 31, 2017, all $50.0 million of the Company’s capital securities qualified as Tier 1 capital.

20. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company accounts for fair value measurements in accordance with FASB ASC 820. FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements. The definition of fair value retains the exchange price notion in earlier definitions of fair value. FASB ASC 820 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability. The definition focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). FASB ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement and also clarifies the application of fair value measurement in a market that is not active.

FASB ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

FASB ASC 820 requires the Company to disclose the fair value of financial assets on both a recurring and non-recurring basis. Those assets and liabilities which will continue to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

SUMMARY OF RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

   Total   Category Used for Fair Value Measurement 
       Level 1           Level 2           Level 3     

December 31, 2017

        

Assets:

    ��   

Investment securities available for sale:

        

U.S. Treasury securities

  $3,495   $3,495   $   $ 

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities

   244,261        244,261     

Trust preferred securities

   10,737                10,737 

Collateralized loan obligations

                

Other securities

   1,710    1,710         

Hedged commercial loans

   1,349        1,349     

Interest rate swaps

   517        517     

Liabilities:

        

Fair value interest rate swaps

   101        101     

Interest rate swaps

   518        518     

December 31, 2016

        

Assets:

        

Investment securities available for sale:

        

U.S. Treasury securities

  $2,498   $    2,498   $   $ 

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities

       244,658            244,658     

Trust preferred securities

   9,851            9,851 

Collateralized loan obligations

   37,319        37,319     

Other securities

   1,360    1,360         

Hedged commercial loans

   1,634        1,634     

Interest rate swaps

   2,077        2,077     

Liabilities:

        

Fair value interest rate swaps

   165        165     

Interest rate swaps

   2,087        2,087     

Level 1 Valuation Techniques and Inputs

U.S. Treasury securities. The Company reports U.S. Treasury securities at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. These securities are priced using observable quotations for the indicated security.

Other securities. The other securities category is comprised of money market mutual funds. Given the short maturity structure and the expectation that the investment can be redeemed at par value, the fair value of these investments is assumed to be the book value.

Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Inputs

The majority of the Company’s investment securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. Prices of these securities are obtained through independent, third-party pricing services. Prices obtained through these sources include market derived quotations and matrix pricing and may include both observable and unobservable inputs. Fair market values take into consideration data such as dealer quotes, new issue pricing, trade prices for similar issues, prepayment estimates, cash flows, market credit spreads and other factors. The Company reviews the output from the third-party providers for reasonableness by the pricing consistency among securities with similar characteristics, where available, and comparing values with other pricing sources available to the Company.

In general, the Level 2 valuation process uses the following significant inputs in determining the fair value of the Company’s different classes of investments:

U.S. Government agency securities. These securities are evaluated based on either a nominal spread basis for non-callable securities or on an option adjusted spread (“OAS”) basis for callable securities. The nominal spread and OAS levels are derived from observations of identical or comparable securities actively trading in the markets.

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities. The Company’s agency mortgage-backed securities generally fall into one of two categories, fixed-rate agency mortgage-backed pools or adjustable-rate agency mortgage-backed pools.

Fixed-rate agency mortgage-backed pools are evaluated based on spreads to actively traded To-Be-Announced (“TBA”) and seasoned securities, the pricing of which is provided by inter-dealer brokers, broker dealers and other contributing firms active in trading the security class. Further delineation is made by weighted average coupon (“WAC”) and weighted average maturity (“WAM”) with spreads on individual securities relative to actively traded securities as determined and quality controlled using OAS valuations.

Adjustable-rate agency mortgage-backed pools are valued on a bond equivalent effective margin (“BEEM”) basis obtained from broker dealers and other contributing firms active in the market. BEEM levels are established for key sectors using characteristics such as month-to-roll, index, periodic and life caps and index margins and convertibility. Individual securities are then evaluated based on how their characteristics map to the sectors established.

Collateralized loan obligations. The fair value measurements for collateralized loan obligations are obtained through quotes obtained from broker/dealers based on similar actively traded securities.

Hedged commercial loans. The hedged commercial loans are one component of a declared hedging relationship as defined under FASB ASC 815. The interest rate swap component of the declared hedging relationships is carried at its fair value and the carrying value of the commercial loans included a similar change in fair values. The fair value of these loans is estimated through discounted cash flow analysis which utilizes available credit and interest rate market data on performance of similar loans.

Interest rate swaps. The Company’s interest rate swaps, including fair value interest rate swaps and small exposures in interest rate caps and floors, are reported at fair value utilizing models provided by an independent, third-party and observable market data. When entering into an interest rate swap agreement, the Company is exposed to fair value changes due to interest rate movements, and also the potential nonperformance of its contract counterparty. Interest rate swaps are evaluated based on a zero coupon LIBOR curve created from readily observable data on LIBOR, interest rate futures and the interest rate swap markets. The zero coupon curve is used to discount the projected cash flows on each individual interest rate swap. In addition, the Company has developed a methodology to value the nonperformance risk based on internal credit risk metrics and the unique characteristics of derivative instruments, which include notional exposure rather than principal at risk and interest payment netting. The results of this methodology are used to adjust the base fair value of the instrument for the potential counterparty credit risk. Interest rate caps and floors are evaluated using industry standard options pricing models and observed market data on LIBOR and Eurodollar option and cap/floor volatilities.

Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Inputs

Trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities are evaluated based on whether the security is an obligation of a single issuer or part of a securitization pool. For single issuer obligations, the Company uses discounted cash flow models which incorporate the contractual cash flow for each issue adjusted as necessary for any potential changes in amount or timing of cash flows. The cash flow model of a pooled issue incorporates anticipated loss rates and severities of the underlying collateral as well as credit support provided within the

securitization. At least quarterly, the Company’s Treasury personnel review the modeling assumptions which include default assumptions, discount and forward rates. Changes in these assumptions could potentially have a significant impact on the fair value of the trust preferred securities.

The cash flow model for the pooled issue owned by the Company at December 31, 2016 assumes no recovery on defaulted collateral, no recovery on securities in deferral and an additional 3.6% future default rate assumption on the remaining performing collateral every three years with no recovery rate.

For trust preferred securities, projected cash flows are discounted at a rate based on a trading group of similar securities quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) or over-the-counter markets which is reviewed for market data points such as credit rating, maturity, price and liquidity. The Company indexes the market securities to a comparable maturity interest rate swap to determine the market spread, which is then used as the discount rate in the cash flow models. As of the reporting date, the market spreads were 2.75% for the pooled security and 5.25% for the single issuer. An increase or decrease of 3% in the discount rate on the pooled issue would result in a decrease of $1.6 million or an increase of $1.9 million in the security fair value, respectively. An increase or decrease of 3% in the discount rate on the single issuer would result in a decrease of $924 thousand or an increase of $1.5 million in the security fair value, respectively.

The following provides details of the Level 3 fair value measurement activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS USING SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS – LEVEL 3 INVESTMENT SECURITIES

For the Years Ended December 31,

  2017   2016 

Balance, beginning of year

  $9,851   $    10,175 

Total gains (losses), realized/unrealized:

    

Included in earnings

   5    5 

Included in accumulated other

comprehensive income

   881    (329

Purchases

        

Maturities

        

Prepayments

        

Calls

        

Transfers out of Level 3

        
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  $    10,737   $9,851 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

There were no transfers between the three levels for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The Company measures impaired loans, loans held-for-sale, bank properties and equipment, bank properties transferred to other real estate owned and SBA servicing assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, these assets were valued in accordance with GAAP, and except for impaired loans included in the following table, did not require fair value disclosure under the provisions of FASB ASC 820. The related changes in fair value for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

SUMMARY OF NON-RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

   Total   Category Used for Fair Value
Measurement
   Total (Losses)
Gains Or Changes
in Net Assets
 
   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 

December 31, 2017

          

Assets:

          

Impaired loans

  $767   $   $   $767   $(105

December 31, 2016

          

Assets:

          

Impaired loans

  $        799   $        —   $        —   $        799   $(65

Under FASB ASC 310, the fair value of collateral dependent impaired loans is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, typically real estate, which is based on valuations. It is the policy of the Company to obtain a current appraisal or evaluation when a loan has been identified as non-performing. The type of appraisal obtained will be commensurate with the size and complexity of the loan. The resulting value will be adjusted for the potential cost of liquidation and decline of values in the market. New appraisals are obtained on an annual basis until the loan is repaid in full, liquidated or returns to performing status.

While the loan policy dictates that a loan be assigned to the special assets department when it is placed on non-accrual status, there is a need for loan officers to consistently and accurately determine collateral values when a loan is initially designated as criticized or classified. The most effective means of determining the fair value of real estate collateral at a point in time is by obtaining a current appraisal or evaluation of the property. In anticipation of the receipt of a current appraisal or evaluation, the Company has provided for an alternative and interim means of determining the fair value of the real estate collateral.

The most recent appraised or reported value of the collateral securing a loan, net of a discount for the estimated cost of liquidation, is the Company’s basis for determining fair value.

The following table summarizes the Company’s appraisal approach based upon loan category.

Loan Category Used for Impairment Review

  Method of Determining the Value

Loans less than $1 million

Evaluation or restricted use appraisal

Loans $1 million or greater

Existing appraisal 18 months or less

Restricted use appraisal

Existing appraisal greater than 18 months

Summary form appraisal
Commercial loans secured primarily by residential real estate

Loans less than $1 million

Automated valuation model

Loans $1 million or greater

Summary form appraisal
Non-commercial loans secured primarily by residential real estate

Loans less than $250,000

Loans $250,000 or greater

Automated valuation model or Summary form appraisal Summary form appraisal

An evaluation report, as defined by the OCC, is a written report prepared by an appraiser that describes the real estate collateral, its condition, current and projected uses and sources of information used in the analysis, and provides an estimate of value in situations when an appraisal is not required.

A restricted use appraisal report is defined as a written report prepared under the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”). A restricted use appraisal is for the Company’s use only and contains a brief statement of information significant to the determination of the value of the collateral under review. This report can be used for ongoing collateral monitoring.

A summary form appraisal report is defined as a written report prepared under the USPAP which contains a detailed summary of all information significant to the determination of the collateral valuation. This report is more detailed than a restricted use report and provides sufficient information to enable the user to understand the rationale for the opinions and conclusions in the report.

An automated valuation model is an internal computer program that estimates a property’s market value based on market, economic, and demographic factors.

On a quarterly basis, or more frequently as necessary, the Company will review the circumstances of each collateral dependent loan and real estate owned property. A collateral dependent loan is defined as one that relies solely on the operation or the sale of the collateral for repayment. Adjustments to any specific reserve relating to a collateral shortfall, as compared to the outstanding loan balance, will be made if justified by appraisals, market conditions or current events concerning the credit.

All appraisals received which are utilized to determine valuations for criticized and classified loans or properties placed in real estate owned are provided under an “as is value”. Partially charged off loans are measured for impairment upon receipt of an updated appraisal based on the relationship between the remaining balance of the charged down loan and the discounted appraised value. Such loans will remain on non-accrual status unless performance by the borrower warrants a return to accrual status. Recognition of non-accrual status occurs at the time a loan can no longer support principal and interest payments in accordance with the original terms and conditions of the loan documents. When impairment is determined, a specific reserve reflecting any calculated shortfall between the value of the collateral and the outstanding balance of the loan is recorded. Subsequent adjustments, prior to receipt of a new appraisal, to any related specific reserve will be made if justified by market conditions or current events concerning the loan. If an internal discount-based evaluation is being used, the discount percentage may be adjusted to reflect market changes, changes to the collateral value of similar credits or circumstances of the individual loan itself. The amount of charge off is determined by calculating the difference between the current loan balance and the current collateral valuation, plus estimated cost to liquidate.

Impaired loan fair value measurements are based upon unobservable inputs, and therefore, are categorized as a Level 3 measurement. No specific reserves were calculated for impaired loans with an aggregate carrying amount of $3.6 million and $799 thousand at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, as the underlying collateral was not below the carrying amount; however, these loans did include charge-offs of $105 thousand, of which zero related to loans which were fully charged off at December 31, 2017, and $632 thousand, of which $567 thousand related to loans which were fully charged off at December 31, 2016.

Once a loan is determined to be uncollectible, the underlying collateral is repossessed and reclassified as other real estate owned. The balance of other real estate owned also includes bank properties transferred from operations. These assets are carried at lower of cost or fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell. In some cases, adjustments are made to the appraised values for various factors including age of the appraisal, age of comparable properties included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and the collateral. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not transfer any loans or properties to other real estate owned, respectively. There were no real estate owned balances at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In accordance with ASC 825-10-50-10, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, the Company is required to disclose the fair value of its financial instruments. The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a distressed sale. Fair value is best determined using observable market prices; however, for many of the Company’s financial instruments, no quoted market prices are readily available. In instances where quoted market prices are not readily available, fair value is determined using cash flow models or other techniques appropriate for the particular instrument. These techniques involve some degree of judgment and, as a result, are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the

Company would realize in a current market exchange. Utilizing different assumptions or estimation techniques may have a material effect on the estimated fair value.

CARRYING AMOUNTS AND ESTIMATED FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

December 31,

  2017   2016 
   Carrying
Amount
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Carrying
Amount
   Estimated
Fair Value
 

Assets:

        

Cash and due from banks

  $20,642   $20,642   $19,645   $19,645 

Interest-earning bank balances

   68,002    68,002    114,563    114,563 

Restricted cash

   1,000    1,000    5,000    5,000 

Investment securities available for sale

   260,203    260,203    295,686    295,686 

Investment securities held to maturity

           250    250 

Loans receivable, net

     1,559,844      1,526,750      1,592,743      1,575,818 

Hedged commercial loans(1)

   1,349    1,349    1,634    1,634 

Restricted equity investments

   16,967    16,967    15,791    15,791 

Interest rate swaps

   517    517    2,077    2,077 

Liabilities:

        

Demand deposits

   1,061,492    1,028,055    1,095,012    1,070,680 

Savings deposits

   245,706    236,295    241,754    235,216 

Time deposits

   343,237    346,771    404,597    412,903 

Advances from FHLBNY

   85,214    85,297    85,416    85,703 

Junior subordinated debentures

   51,548    33,493    92,786    64,282 

Fair value interest rate swaps

   101    101    165    165 

Interest rate swaps

   518    518    2,087    2,087 

(1)

Includes positive market value adjustment of $101 thousand and $165 thousand at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which is equal to the change in value of related interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges of these hedged loans in accordance with FASB ASC 815.

Cash and cash equivalents. For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. This is a Level 1 fair value input.

Restricted cash. For restricted cash, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. This is a Level 1 fair value input.

Investment securities. For investment securities, fair values are based on a combination of quoted prices for identical assets in active markets, quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are either actively or not actively traded and pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques that may contain unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and require significant judgment. The fair value of available-for-sale securities is measured utilizing Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. The fair value of held-to-maturity securities is measured utilizing Level 2 inputs.

Loans receivable, net. The fair value of loans receivable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis. Projected future cash flows are calculated using loan characteristics, and assumptions of voluntary and involuntary prepayment speeds. For performing loans Level 2 inputs are utilized as the cash flow analysis is performed using available market data on the performance of similar loans. Projected cash flows are prepared using discount rates believed to represent current market rates. For non-performing loans, the cash flow assumptions are considered Level 3 inputs as market data is not readily available.

Hedged commercial loans. The hedged commercial loans are one component of a declared hedging relationship as defined under FASB ASC 815. The interest rate swap component of the declared hedging

relationship is carried at their fair value and the carrying value of the commercial loans includes a similar change in fair values. The fair value of these loans is measured utilizing Level 2 inputs.

Restricted equity securities. Ownership in equity securities of FRB, FHLBNY, and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank is restricted and there is no established market for their resale. The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. As these securities are readily marketable, the fair value is based on Level 2 inputs.

Interest rate swaps/floors and fair value interest rate swaps. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are not exchange-traded and therefore are valued utilizing models with the primary input being readily observable market parameters, specifically the LIBOR swap curve. In addition, the Company incorporates a qualitative fair value adjustment related to credit quality variations between counterparties as required by FASB ASC 820. This is a Level 2 input.

Demand deposits, savings deposits and time deposits. The fair value of demand deposits and savings deposits is determined by projecting future cash flows using an estimated economic life based on account characteristics, a Level 2 input. The resulting cash flow is discounted using rates available on alternative funding sources. The fair value of time deposits is estimated using the rate and maturity characteristics of the deposits to estimate their cash flow. This cash flow is discounted at rates for similar term wholesale funding.

Junior subordinated debentures. The fair value was estimated by discounting approximate cash flows of the borrowings by yields estimating the fair value of similar issues. The valuation model considers current market spreads known and anticipated credit issues of the underlying collateral, term and reinvestment period and market transactions of similar issues, if available. This is a Level 3 input under the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these consolidated financial statements since those dates and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amount presented herein.

21. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Certain officers, directors and their associates (related parties) have loans and conduct other transactions with the Company. Such transactions are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for other non-related party transactions.

Related party activity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is summarized as follows:

SUMMARY OF LOANS TO RELATED PARTIES

At or for the Years Ended December 31,

  2017  2016 

Balance, beginning of year

  $424  $    2,433 

Additions

       

Other reductions(1)

      (236 

Repayments

   (18  (1,773
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  $        406  $424 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Represents balances at the beginning of the period for related parties who left the Company during the course of the year.

Interest income earned on related party loans was $20 thousand and $21 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Certain office space of the Company is leased from companies affiliated with former Directors who remain affiliates of the Company under separate agreements with the Company.

Terms of these two agreements at December 31, 2017 are as follows:

SUMMARY OF LEASES WITH AFFILIATES

December 31, 2017

  Annual
Rental
Payment
   Renewal Option
Remaining
  Annual
Rental

  Increases  

Expiration date:

      

January 2027

  $196   4 five-
year terms
  Fixed

June 2029(1)

               269   N/A  CPI

(1)

This lease is recorded as a $2.3 million obligation under capital lease at December 31, 2017.

At the time of each of the related party transactions described above, the Company determined that each transaction was on terms as fair to the Company as could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through March 21, 2018, the date the financial statements were available to be issued. Except for the Merger disclosed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, there are no subsequent events that require disclosure.

* * * * * *

Annex A

EXECUTION VERSION

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

by and among

OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP.,

MASTERS MERGER SUB CORP.OCEANFIRST BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

and

OCEAN SHORE HOLDING CO.CAPITAL BANK OF NEW JERSEY

 

 

Dated as of July 12, 2016October 25, 2018


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page 

Article I

THE INTEGRATED MERGERSMERGER

1.1

 

The Integrated Mergers;Merger; Effective Time

Time; Effects of the Merger
   A-1 

1.2

 

Closing

   A-2 

1.3

 

EffectsCharter of the Integrated Mergers

Surviving Bank
   A-2 

1.4

 

EffectsBylaws of First-Step Merger on Merger Sub Capital Stock

Surviving Bank
   A-2 

1.5

 

Conversion of Company Common Stock in the First-Step Merger

Directors; Officers
   A-2 

1.6

 

Effects of Second-Step Merger on Parent and Company Common Stock

Tax Consequences
   A-3

1.7

Treatment of Company Equity Awards

A-3

1.8

Certificate of Incorporation of Surviving Corporation

A-4

1.9

Bylaws of Surviving Corporation

A-4

1.10

Directors; Officers

A-4

1.11

Tax Consequences

A-5

1.12

Bank Merger

A-5A-2 

Article II

EXCHANGE OF SHARES

2.1

 

Parent to Make Merger Consideration Available

Company Common Stock
   A-5A-2 

2.2

 

Exchange of Shares

Company Stock Options
   A-5A-3

2.3

Company Restricted Stock AwardsA-4

2.4

Parent to Make Merger Consideration AvailableA-4

2.5

Exchange of SharesA-4

2.6

Dissenter’s RightsA-6

2.7

Actions of the CompanyA-6

2.8

Tax WithholdingsA-6 

Article III

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY

3.1

 

Corporate Organization

   A-7 

3.2

 

Capitalization

   A-9A-8 

3.3

 

Authority; No Violation

   A-9 

3.4

 

Consents and Approvals

   A-10 

3.5

 

Reports

   A-11 

3.6

 

Financial Statements

   A-11 

3.7

 

Broker’s Fees

   A-12 

3.8

 

Absence of Certain Changes or Events

   A-12 

3.9

 

Legal Proceedings

   A-13 

3.10

 

Taxes and Tax Returns

   A-13 

3.11

 

Employees

   A-14A-15 

3.12

 

SEC Reports

A-17

3.13

Compliance with Applicable Law

A-17

3.14

Certain Contracts

   A-18 

3.153.13

 

Agreements with Regulatory Agencies

Certain Contracts
   A-19 

3.163.14

 

Risk Management Instruments

A-19

3.17

Environmental Matters

A-19

3.18

Investment Securities and Commodities

Agreements with Regulatory Agencies
   A-20 

3.193.15

 

Real Property

A-20

3.20

Intellectual Property

A-20

3.21

Related Party Transactions

Risk Management Instruments
   A-21 

3.223.16

 

Takeover Protections

Environmental Matters
   A-21 

3.233.17

 

Opinion

Investment Securities and Commodities
   A-21 

3.243.18

 

Company Information

A-21

3.25

Allowance for Loan Portfolio

Losses
   A-22 

3.19

Real PropertyA-22

3.20

Intellectual Property; Company SystemsA-22

3.21

Related Party TransactionsA-23

 

A-i


3.263.22

 

Insurance

State Takeover Laws
   A-23A-24

3.23

ReorganizationA-24

3.24

OpinionA-24

3.25

Company InformationA-24

3.26

Loan PortfolioA-24 

3.27

 InsuranceA-25

3.28

No Other Representations or Warranties

   A-23A-25 

Article IV

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT

4.1

 

Corporate Organization

A-23

4.2

Capitalization

A-24

4.3

Authority; No Violation

A-25

4.4

Consents and Approvals

   A-26 

4.54.2

 

Reports

Capitalization
   A-26A-27 

4.64.3

 

Financial Statements

Authority; No Violation
   A-26A-27 

4.74.4

 

Broker’s Fees

Consents and Approvals
   A-28 

4.84.5

 

Absence of Certain Changes or Events

Reports
   A-28 

4.94.6

 

Legal Proceedings

A-28

4.10

Taxes and Tax Returns

A-28

4.11

Employees

Financial Statements
   A-29 

4.124.7

 

SEC Reports

A-29

4.13

Compliance with Applicable Law

Broker’s Fees
   A-30 

4.144.8

 

Agreements with Regulatory Agencies

Absence of Certain Changes or Events
   A-30 

4.9

Legal ProceedingsA-30

4.10

SEC ReportsA-30

4.11

Compliance with LawA-30

4.12

Agreements with Regulatory AgenciesA-31

4.13

Takeover ProtectionsA-31

4.14

ReorganizationA-31

4.15

 

Certain Contracts

Parent Information
   A-31 

4.16

 

Environmental Matters

A-31

4.17

Insurance

A-31

4.18

Loan Portfolio

Parent Systems
   A-32 

4.194.17

 

Takeover Protections

Taxes and Tax Returns
   A-32 

4.204.18

 

Opinion

Employees
   A-32A-33 

4.214.19

 

Parent Information

Risk Management Instruments
   A-32A-34 

4.224.20

 

No Other Representations or Warranties

   A-32A-34 

Article V

COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS

5.1

 

Conduct of Business of the Company Prior to the Effective Time

   A-33A-34 

5.2

 

Company Forbearances

   A-33A-35 

5.3

 

Parent Forbearances

Covenants
   A-36A-37 

5.4

 

Tax-free Reorganization

   A-36
Article VIA-38 

Article VI

ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

6.1

 

SEC Filings; Regulatory Matters

   A-36A-38 

6.2

 

Access to Information; Confidentiality

A-37

6.3

Shareholders’ Approvals

   A-39 

6.46.3

 

Legal Conditions to Merger

Company Stockholders’ Approvals
   A-40 

6.56.4

 

Stock Exchange Listing

Legal Conditions to Merger
   A-41 

6.66.5

 

Employee Matters

A-41

6.7

Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance

Stock Exchange Listing
   A-42 

6.86.6

 

Additional Agreements

Employee Matters
   A-43

6.9

Advice of Changes

A-43

6.10

Litigation and Claims

A-44

6.11

Dividends

A-44

6.12

Corporate Governance

A-44

6.13

Acquisition Proposals

A-44

6.14

Board of Directors and Committee Meetings

A-46A-42 

 

A-ii


6.156.7

 

Public Announcements

Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance
   A-46A-43

6.8

Additional AgreementsA-44

6.9

Advice of ChangesA-44

6.10

Litigation and ClaimsA-45

6.11

Takeover StatutesA-45

6.12

Acquisition ProposalsA-45

6.13

Board of Directors and Committee MeetingsA-47

6.14

Public AnnouncementsA-47

6.15

Operating FunctionsA-47 

6.16

 

Change of Method

A-46

6.17

Restructuring Efforts

A-46

6.18

Takeover Statutes

A-46

6.19

Exemption from Liability Under Section 16(b)

   A-47 

Article VII

CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

7.1

 

Conditions to Each Party’s Obligation To Effect the Integrated Mergers

Merger
   A-47 

7.2

 

Conditions to Obligations of Parent

   A-48 

7.3

 

Conditions to Obligations of the Company

   A-48A-49 

Article VIII

TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT

8.1

 

Termination

   A-49A-50 

8.2

 

Effect of Termination

A-51

8.3

Amendment

   A-52 

8.48.3

 

Extension; Waiver

Amendment
   A-52A-53 
Article IX

8.4

Extension; WaiverA-54 

Article IX

GENERAL PROVISIONS

9.1

 

Nonsurvival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements

A-53

9.2

Expenses

A-53

9.3

Notices

A-53

9.4

Interpretation

   A-54 

9.59.2

 

Counterparts

Expenses
   A-54 

9.69.3

 

Entire Agreement

Notices
   A-54 

9.79.4

 

Governing Law; Jurisdiction

A-54

9.8

Waiver of Jury Trial

Interpretation
   A-55 

9.99.5

 

Assignment; Third Party Beneficiaries

Counterparts
   A-55 

9.109.6

 

Specific Performance

Entire Agreement
   A-55 

9.119.7

 

Severability

Governing Law; Jurisdiction
   A-55A-56

9.8

Waiver of Jury TrialA-56

9.9

Assignment; Third Party BeneficiariesA-56

9.10

Remedies; Specific PerformanceA-56

9.11

SeverabilityA-57 

9.12

 

Delivery by Facsimile or Electronic Transmission

   A-56A-57 

Exhibit A – Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company

Exhibit B – Bank Merger Agreement

 Support Agreements

Exhibit B –

 Hanrahan Amendment Agreement

Exhibit C –

 Lobosco Amendment Agreement

Exhibit D –

 Rehm Amendment Agreement

Exhibit E –

 Branch Offices of the Company

Exhibit F –

 Branch Offices of the Bank

 

A-iii


INDEX OF DEFINED TERMS

 

   Page 

Acquisition Proposal

   A-45

Advisory Board

A-44A-62 

affiliate

   A-51A-74 

Agreement

   A-1 

Bank MergerAllowance

   A-5A-29

Average Closing Price

A-69

Balance Sheet

A-15 

Bank Merger Agreement

A-5

Bank Merger Certificate

A-5

BCA

   A-1 

Cash ConsiderationBank Bylaws

A-3

Bank Charter

   A-2

BHC Act

A-35

business day

A-74

Canceled Shares

A-3 

Chosen Courts

   A-55A-75 

Closing

   A-2 

Closing Date

   A-2 

Code

   A-1 

Company

   A-1 

Company BankAdverse Recommendation Change

   A-5A-55 

Company Benefit Plans

   A-14A-20 

Company Bylaws

   A-8A-10 

Company Certificate

   A-8A-10 

Company Common Stock

   A-2A-3 

Company Contract

   A-18

Company Deferred Stock Unit

A-4A-27 

Company Disclosure Schedule

   A-7A-9 

Company Equity Awards

   A-4

Company Equity Plan

A-3A-11 

Company ERISA Affiliate

   A-14

Company ESOP

A-41A-22 

Company Indemnified Parties

   A-42

Company Insiders

A-47

Company Leased Properties

A-20A-58 

Company Meeting

   A-39A-54 

Company Owned PropertiesOffering

   A-20A-12 

Company Qualified Plans

   A-15A-21 

Company Real PropertyRecommendation

   A-20A-54 

Company Regulatory Agreement

   A-19

Company Reports

A-17A-28 

Company Restricted Stock Award

   A-4A-5 

Company Stock Option

   A-3A-4 

Company Subsidiary

   A-8A-10

Company Systems

A-31

Company Tender Offer

A-12 

Confidentiality Agreement

   A-38A-54 

Continuing Employees

   A-41

Converted Company Option

A-3

Delaware Secretary

A-2A-56 

Derivative Contract

   A-19A-28 

Determination Date

   A-51A-70 

DGCLDetermination Period

   A-2A-70

Dissenting Shares

A-8 

DOL

   A-14A-21 

Effective Time

   A-1A-2 

Enforceability Exceptions

   A-10A-13 

Environmental Laws

   A-19A-29 

A-iv


ERISA

   A-14

ESOP Termination Date

A-41

Exception Shares

A-2A-20 

Exchange Act

   A-10A-14 

A-iv


Exchange Agent

   A-5 

Exchange Fund

   A-5 

Exchange Ratio

   A-2A-4 

FDIC

   A-8

Federal Reserve Board

A-8A-10 

FHLB

   A-8A-10 

Final Index Price

   A-51A-70 

First-Step MergerFinancial Statements

   A-1

First-Step Merger Certificate

A-1A-15 

GAAP

   A-8A-9 

Governmental Entity

   A-10A-14 

HOLAIndex Group

   A-8A-70 

Index Price

   A-51A-70 

Index Ratio

   A-51

Initial Index Price

A-51

Initial Parent Market Value

A-51

Integrated Mergers

A-1A-69 

Intellectual Property

   A-20A-31

Interim Financial Statements

A-15 

IRS

   A-14A-21 

Joint Proxy Statementknowledge of Parent

   A-10A-74

knowledge of the Company

A-74 

Laws

   A-17A-24

Leased Real Property

A-30 

Liens

   A-9

Loan Participation

A-22A-12 

Loans

   A-22A-33

made available

A-74 

Material Adverse Effect

   A-8A-9 

Materially Burdensome Regulatory Condition

   A-37A-52

Merger

A-1 

Merger Consideration

   A-2

Merger Sub

A-1

Merger Sub Bylaws

A-4 

Merger Sub CertificateNotice

   A-4A-2 

Multiemployer Plan

   A-15A-22 

Multiple Employer Plan

   A-15A-22 

NASDAQ

   A-6A-5

National Bank Act

A-2 

New Certificates

   A-3

New Jersey Secretary

A-1A-4 

New Plans

A-57

NJ Code

A-2

NJ Department

   A-14 

OCC

   A-10A-2 

Old Certificate

   A-2A-4

ordinary course of business

A-74

Owned Real Property

A-29 

Parent

   A-1 

Parent Bank

A-5

Parent Benefit Plans

   A-29

Parent Bylaws

A-4

Parent Certificate

A-4A-44 

Parent Common Stock

   A-2

Parent Confidential Information

A-38

Parent Contract

A-31A-4 

Parent Disclosure Schedule

   A-23A-35 

Parent Equity Awards

   A-24A-36 

A-v


Parent ERISA Affiliate

   A-29A-45 

Parent Market ValueQualified Plans

   A-51A-44 

Parent MeetingRatio

   A-39A-70 

Parent Regulatory Agreement

   A-31A-42 

Parent Reports

   A-29A-41 

Parent Restricted Stock Awards

   A-24

Parent Share Issuance

A-25A-36 

Parent Subsidiary

   A-24A-35

Parent Systems

A-43

A-v


party

A-74 

PBGC

   A-14A-21 

Permitted Encumbrances

   A-20A-30 

person

   A-54A-74 

Premium Cap

   A-43A-59

Proxy Statement

A-14

Real Estate Leases

A-30 

Regulatory Agencies

   A-11A-14 

Representatives

   A-44A-61 

Requisite Company Vote

   A-10

Requisite Parent Vote

A-25A-13 

Requisite Regulatory Approvals

   A-37A-53 

Restrictive Covenant

   A-17A-23 

S-4

   A-10

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

A-12A-14 

SEC

   A-10

Second-Step Merger

A-1

Second-Step Merger Certificates

A-2A-14 

Securities Act

   A-17A-14 

Stock ConsiderationSkadden

   A-2 

Starting Date

A-70

Starting Price

A-70

Subsidiary

   A-8A-10 

Superior Proposal

   A-45A-62

Support Agreements

A-1 

Surviving CorporationBank

   A-1 

Takeover Statutes

   A-21A-32 

Tax

   A-14A-20 

Tax Return

   A-14A-20 

Taxes

   A-14A-20 

Terminated Plan

   A-41A-57 

Termination Date

   A-50A-68 

Termination Fee

   A-51A-71 

Voting Agreementsthe date hereof

   A-1A-74 

 

A-vi


AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of July 12, 2016October 25, 2018 (this “Agreement”), is by and among OceanFirst Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), Masters Merger Sub Corp.OceanFirst Bank, National Association, a national banking association and a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent (the “Bank”), and Capital Bank of New Jersey, a New Jersey corporation and a wholly-own Subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), and Ocean Shore Holding Co., a New Jersey corporationchartered commercial bank (the “Company”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the BoardsBoard of Directors of each of Parent, the Bank and the Company have determined that it is in the best interests of their respective companies and their shareholdersstockholders for such companies to consummate the strategic business combination transaction provided for herein, pursuant to which (i) Merger Subthe Company will, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, merge with and into the CompanyBank (the “First-Step Merger”), so thatwith the Company isBank as the surviving corporationbank in the First-Step Merger and a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent and (ii) immediately thereafter, the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First-Step Merger, will merge (the “Second-Step Merger”, and together with the First-Step Merger, the “Integrated Mergers”) with and into Parent, with Parent being the surviving corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to in such capacity as the “Surviving CorporationBank”);

WHEREAS, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it is intended that the Integrated Mergers shall together be treated as a single integrated transaction that qualifiesMerger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and this Agreement is intended to be, and is adopted as, a plan of reorganization for purposes of Sections 354, 361 and 368 of the Code and within the meaning of Treasury regulationRegulation section1.368-2(g);

WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, as a condition and an inducement for Parent to enter into this Agreement, certain shareholdersstockholders of the Company have simultaneously herewith entered into separate voting and support agreements with Parent substantially in the form ofExhibit A(collectively, the “VotingSupport Agreements”) in connection with the First-Step Merger;

WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, David J. Hanrahan Sr., the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Thomas J. Lobosco, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Joseph F. Rehm, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Company, each has entered into an Amendment Agreement with the Company in the forms attached hereto asExhibit B,Exhibit C andExhibit D, respectively, which such amendments will be assumed by Parent and the Bank effective as of the Effective Time; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the Integrated MergersMerger and also to prescribe certain conditions precedent to the Integrated Mergers.Merger.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, representations, warranties and agreements contained herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

THE INTEGRATED MERGERSMERGER

1.1The Integrated Mergers;Merger; Effective TimeTime; Effects of the Merger.

(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, in accordance with Section 215a and other applicable provisions of the National Bank Act, as amended, 12 U.S.C. §1,et seq. (the “National Bank Act”), and Section 148.B. and other applicable provisions of the New Jersey Business CorporationBanking Act of 1948, as amended (the “BCANJ Code”), at the Effective Time, Merger Subthe Company (with its principal office located at 175 South Main Road, Vineland, New Jersey 08360 and having branch offices at the locations set forth onExhibit E), shall merge with and into the Company.Bank (with its principal office located at 110 West Front Street, Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 and having branch offices at the locations set forth onExhibit F). The CompanyBank shall be the surviving corporationbank in the First-Step Merger,

and shall continue its corporate existence under the laws of the StateUnited States of New Jersey.America. Upon consummation of the First-Step Merger, the separate corporate existence of Merger Subthe Company shall terminate.

(b) On or before the Closing Date, Parentterms and subject to the Company, respectively, shall cause to be filed a certificateconditions of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey (the “New Jersey Secretary”)this Agreement and in accordance with the BCA (the “First-Step Merger Certificate”). The First-StepNational Bank Act and the NJ Code, the Merger shall becomebe effective as of the date andat such time specified in the First-Step certification issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) (the “Merger CertificateNotice”) (or as otherwise specified in the Merger Notice) (such date and time, the “Effective Time”).

(b)     Immediately following At and after the Effective Time, subject to the terms and conditions ofMerger shall have the effects provided in this Agreement in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) and the BCA, the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First-Step Merger, shall merge with and into Parent. Parent shall be the Surviving Corporation in the Second-Step Merger, and shall continue its corporate existence under the lawsapplicable provisions of the State of Delaware. Upon consummationNational Bank Act and the NJ Code. Without limiting the generality of the Second-Step Merger,foregoing, at the separate corporate existenceEffective Time, all the property, rights, privileges, powers and franchises of the Bank and the Company shall terminate. On or beforevest in the Closing Date, ParentSurviving Bank, and all debts, liabilities and duties of the Bank and the Company respectively, shall cause to be filed a certificate of ownershipbecome the debts, liabilities and merger with the Secretary of Stateduties of the StateSurviving Bank. The home office of Delaware (the “Delaware Secretary”) in accordance with the DGCL and a certificate of merger with theSurviving Bank shall be 110 West Front Street, Red Bank, New Jersey Secretary in accordance with the BCA (collectively, the “Second-Step Merger Certificates”). The Second-Step Merger shall become effective as of the date and time specified in the Second-Step Merger Certificates.07701.

1.2Closing. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the closing of the Integrated MergersMerger (the “Closing”) will take place at 10:00 a.m., New York City time, at the offices of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and& Flom LLP (“Skadden”), on the last business day of the first month after December 2018 in which the conditions set forth inArticle VII hereof have been satisfied or, if permitted by applicable law,Law, waived (other than those conditions that by their nature can only be satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver thereof), unless another date, time or place is agreed to in writing by Parent and the Company. The date on which the Closing occurs is referred to in this Agreement as the “Closing Date.”

1.3EffectsCharter of the Integrated MergersSurviving Bank. At and immediately after the Effective Time, the First-Step Merger shall have the effects set forth in the applicable provisionsCharter of the BCA. At and after the effective time of the Second-Step Merger, the Second-Step Merger shall have the effects set forth in the applicable provisions of the DGCL and the BCA.

1.4     Effects of First-Step Merger on Merger Sub Capital Stock. At and after the Effective Time, each share of the capital stock of Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into and become one newly and validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of the capital stock of the Company.

1.5     Conversion of Company Common Stock in the First-Step Merger. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the First-Step Merger and without any action on the part of Parent, Merger Sub or the Company or the holder of any of the following securities:

(a)     Subject toSection 2.2(e), each share of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Company Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, except for shares of Company Common Stock owned by the Company as treasury stock or owned by the Company or Parent (in each case, other than shares of Company Common Stock held in any Company Benefit Plans or related trust accounts, or otherwise held in a fiduciary or agency capacity or as a result of debts previously contracted (collectively, the “Exception Shares”)), shall be converted, in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Agreement, into the right to receive the following, without interest:

     (i)     $4.35 in cash (the “Cash Consideration”); and

    (ii)     0.9667 (the “Exchange Ratio”) validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Parent (such common stock, the “Parent Common Stock” and such shares of Parent Common Stock, the “Stock Consideration” and, together with the Cash Consideration, the “Merger Consideration”).

(b)     All of the shares of Company Common Stock converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration pursuant to thisArticle I shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically be cancelled and shall cease to exist as of the Effective Time, and each certificate (each, an “Old Certificate”,itbeingunderstood that any reference herein to “Old Certificate” shall be deemed to include reference to book-entry account statements relating to the ownership of shares of Company Common Stock) previously representing any such

shares of Company Common Stock shall thereafter represent only the right to receive (i) the Merger Consideration in accordance with, and subject to,Section 1.5(a), (ii) cash in lieu of fractional shares which the shares of Company Common Stock represented by such Old Certificate have been converted into the right to receive pursuant to thisSection 1.5 andSection 2.2(e), without any interest thereon, and (iii) any dividends or distributions which the holder thereof has the right to receive pursuant toSection 2.2(b). Old Certificates previously representing shares of Company Common Stock shall be exchanged for evidence of shares in book entry form or, at Parent’s option, certificates (collectively referred to herein as “New Certificates”), representing the Stock Consideration (together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto and cash in lieu of fractional shares issued in consideration therefor) and the Cash Consideration upon the surrender of such Old Certificates in accordance withSection 2.2, without any interest thereon. If, prior to the Effective Time, the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock or Company Common Stock shall have been increased, decreased, or changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities, in any such case as a result of a reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, or other similar change in capitalization, or there shall be any extraordinary dividend or distribution, an appropriate and proportionate adjustment shall be made to the Merger Consideration to give holders of Company Common Stock the same economic effect as contemplated by this Agreement prior to such event.

(c)     Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at the Effective Time, all shares of Company Common Stock that are owned by the Company or Parent (in each case, other than the Exception Shares) shall be cancelled and shall cease to exist and neither the Merger Consideration nor any other consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor.

1.6     Effects of Second-Step Merger on Parent and Company Common Stock. At the effective time of the Second-Step Merger, each share of (a) Parent Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to such time shall remain issued and outstanding and shall not be affected by the Second-Step Merger and (b) capital stock of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First-Step Merger, issued and outstanding immediately prior to such time, shall be cancelled and shall cease to exist and neither the Merger Consideration nor any other consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor.

1.7     Treatment of Company Equity Awards.

(a)     At the Effective Time, each option granted by the Company to purchase shares of Company Common Stock under the Ocean Shore Holding Co. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the Ocean Shore Holding Co. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (each, a “Company Equity Plan”), whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the Effective Time (each, a “Company Stock Option”) shall, without any further action on the part of any holder thereof, be assumed and converted into an option to purchase from Parent, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable under such Company Stock Option immediately prior to the Effective Time, a number of shares of Parent Common Stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) determined by multiplying (x) the number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to such Company Stock Option immediately prior to the Effective Time by (y) 1.2084, at a per share exercise price (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the per share exercise price for each share of Company Common Stock subject to such Company Stock Option by (ii) 1.2084 (each, as so adjusted, a “Converted Company Option”). All rounding described in thisSection 1.7(a) shall be done on an aggregate basis such that a single rounding of shares and exercise price shall be applied to each Converted Company Option.

(b)     The Converted Company Options shall have the same vesting schedule (including any acceleration of vesting as provided in the applicable Company Equity Plan) as the Company Stock Options and otherwise shall have the same terms and conditions as such Company Stock Options;provided, that Parent shall convert the Company Stock Options into Converted Company Options in a manner consistent with the requirements of Sections 409A and 424(a) of the Code, as applicable. After such assumption and conversion, the Converted Company Options shall be subject to all of the terms and conditions of the plan and grant agreements under which the Company Stock Options were originally issued (including any applicable change in control or

other accelerated vesting provisions, and this transaction shall constitute a change in control for all relevant provisions).

(c)     At the Effective Time, each restricted stock award in respect of shares of Company Common Stock granted under any Company Equity Plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (a “Company Restricted Stock Award” and, together with the Company Stock Options, the “Company Equity Awards”) shall be or become fully vested and the restrictions thereon shall lapse, and each holder thereof shall be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration in exchange therefor in accordance withSection 1.5 of this Agreement. The Company or Parent will be entitled to deduct and withhold such amounts as may be required to be deducted and withheld under the Code and any applicable state or local Tax laws as allowed under the applicable Company Equity Plan.

(d)     At or prior to the Effective Time, the Company, the Board of Directors of the Company and its compensation committee, as applicable, shall adopt any resolutions and take any actions that are necessary, including obtaining any consents, to (i) effectuate the provisions of thisSection 1.7, (ii) ensure that following the Effective Time, there are no obligations with respect to the Company Equity Awards other than as set forth in thisSection 1.7, (iii) ensure that each deferred stock unit issued in respect of shares of Company Common Stock granted under the Ocean City Home Bank, Stock-Based Deferred Compensation Plan (a “Company Deferred Stock Unit”) is equitably converted into the right to receive Parent Common Stock in accordance with the terms of the Ocean City Home Bank Stock-Based Deferred Compensation Plan and the related trust agreement and (iv) solely for purposes of granting new Company Equity Awards, terminate each Company Equity Plan effective as of the Effective Time; provided, that no action taken by the Company shall be required to be irrevocable until immediately prior to the Effective Time. On or prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall reserve for future issuance a number of shares of Parent Common Stock at least equal to the number of shares of Parent Common Stock that will be subject to Converted Company Options as a result of the actions contemplated by Section 1.7(a). Immediately following the Effective Time, Parent shall file a post-effective amendment to the Form S-4 or a registration statement on Form S-8 (or other applicable form) with respect to the shares of Parent Common Stock subject to such Converted Company Options, shall distribute a prospectus relating to such Form S-8, if applicable, and shall use reasonable best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement for so long as such Converted Company Options remain outstanding.

1.8     Certificate of Incorporation of Surviving Corporation. At the Effective Time, the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First-Step Merger, shall be the Certificate of Incorporation of Merger Sub (the “Merger Sub Certificate”), as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time and attached hereto as(the “Exhibit ABankCharter”), shall be the Charter of the Surviving Bank until such Certificate of Incorporationit is thereafter amended in accordance with its terms and applicable law.Law.

1.4Bylaws of Surviving Bank. At and immediately after the effective timeEffective Time, the Bylaws of the Second-Step Merger, the Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation shall be the Certificate of Incorporation of Parent (the “Parent Certificate”),Bank, as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time (the “BankBylaws”), shall be the Bylaws of the Surviving Bank until it is thereafter amended in accordance with its terms and applicable law.Law.

1.9     Bylaws of Surviving Corporation. At the Effective Time, the Bylaws of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First-Step Merger, shall be the Bylaws of Merger Sub (the “Merger Sub Bylaws”), as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, until thereafter amended in accordance with their terms and applicable law. At the effective time of the Second-Step Merger, the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation shall be the Bylaws of Parent (the “Parent Bylaws”), as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, until thereafter amended in accordance with their terms and applicable law.

1.10     1.5Directors; Officers. At and immediately after the Effective Time, the directors and officers of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First-Step Merger, shall consist of the directors and officers of Merger SubBank in office immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the directors and officers of the Surviving Bank until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified. Subject toSection 6.12, the directors and officers of the Surviving Corporation in the Second-Step Merger shall be the directors and officers of Parent in office immediately prior to the effective time of the Second-Step Merger.

1.11     1.6Tax Consequences. For U.S. federal income Tax purposes, (a) the parties intend that (i) the Integrated MergersMerger shall together be treated as a single integrated transaction that qualifies as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and (ii) Parent, Merger Subthe Bank and the Company shall each be a party to such reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code, and (b) this Agreement is intended to be, and is hereby adopted as, a “plan of reorganization” for purposes of Sections 354, 361 and 368 of the Code and within the meaning of Treasury regulation RegulationSection 1.368-2(g).

1.12     Bank The Merger. Immediately following the consummation of the Integrated Mergers, Ocean City Home Bank, a federal savings bank and a wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company (“Company Bank”), will merge (the “Bank Merger”) with and into OceanFirst Bank, a federal savings bank and a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent (“Parent Bank”), pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger attached hereto asExhibit B, dated as of the date hereof, by and between Company Bank and Parent Bank (the “Bank Merger Agreement”). Parent Bank shall be reported by the surviving bankparties for all Tax purposes in accordance with the Bank Merger and, followingforegoing, unless otherwise required by Law or a Governmental Entity with proper jurisdiction over the Bank Merger, the separate corporate existence of Company Bank shall cease. The parties agree that the Bank Merger shall become effective immediately after the effective time of the Second-Step Merger. Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall cause Company Bank, and Parent shall cause Parent Bank, to execute such articles of combination and such other documents and certificates as are necessary to make the Bank Merger effective (the “Bank Merger Certificate”) immediately following the effective time of the Second-Step Merger.parties.

ARTICLE II

EXCHANGE OF SHARES

2.1Company Common Stock.

(a) Subject to the provisions of thisArticle II, at the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of Parent, the Bank, the Company or the stockholders of any of the foregoing:

(i) Each share of common stock, par value $5.00 per share, of the Company (“Company Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time that is held by the

Company as treasury stock or held by the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary of Parent (in each case, other than shares held in any employee benefit plans or related trust accounts or otherwise held in any fiduciary or agency capacity or as a result of debts previously contracted) (collectively, the “CanceledShares”) shall automatically be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no consideration shall be paid or provided with respect thereto;

(ii) Subject toSection 2.5(e), each share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (excluding (x) the Canceled Shares and Dissenting Shares and (y) shares of Company Common Stock outstanding in respect of Company Restricted Stock Awards which, in the case of this clause (y), are addressed inSection 2.3 below) shall be converted in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Agreement intothe right to receive 1.25 shares (the “Exchange Ratio”) of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Parent (“Parent Common Stock”) (the “MergerConsideration”); and

(iii) Each share of capital stock of the Bank issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall remain issued and outstanding from and after the Effective Time and be unaffected by the Merger. At the Effective Time, the amount of capital stock, including surplus, of the Bank shall be $932,078,000, and the number of outstanding shares of common stock of the Bank shall be 1,000 shares, each of $1.00 par value.

(b) Each share of Company Common Stock converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration pursuant to thisArticle II shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and shall cease to exist as of the Effective Time, and each certificate previously representing any such shares of Company Common Stock (each, an “Old Certificate”, it being understood that any reference herein to “Old Certificate” shall be deemed to include reference to book-entry account statements relating to the ownership of shares of Company Common Stock) shall thereafter represent only the right to receive (x) the Merger Consideration in accordance with, and subject to, thisSection 2.1 and the other terms of thisArticle II, (y) cash in lieu of fractional shares that the shares of Company Common Stock represented by such Old Certificate have been converted into the right to receive pursuant to thisSection 2.1 andSection 2.5(e), without any interest thereon, and (z) any dividends or distributions that the holder thereof has the right to receive pursuant toSection 2.5(b), in the case of each of the foregoing, subject to all applicable withholding of Tax in accordance withSection 2.8.

(c) Old Certificates previously representing shares of Company Common Stock shall be exchanged for evidence of shares in book-entry form or, at Parent’s option, certificates (collectively, referred to herein as “New Certificates”), representing the Merger Consideration (together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto and cash in lieu of fractional shares issued in consideration therefor) upon the surrender of such Old Certificates in accordance withSection 2.5, without any interest thereon and subject to all applicable withholding of Tax in accordance withSection 2.8.

(d) If, prior to the Effective Time, the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock or Company Common Stock shall have been increased, decreased or changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities, in any such case as a result of a reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or other similar change in capitalization, or there shall be any extraordinary dividend or distribution, an appropriate and proportionate adjustment shall be made to the Exchange Ratio to give holders of Company Common Stock the same economic effect as contemplated by this Agreement prior to such event.

2.2Company Stock Options. At the Effective Time, each option to purchase shares of Company Common Stock granted under any Company Benefit Plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (a “Company Stock Option”) (whether vested or unvested) shall be canceled and extinguished at the Effective Time and automatically exchanged into an amount of cash (without interest) equal to the product of (a) the aggregate number of shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of such Company Stock

Option and (b) the excess, if any, of (i) the product of (x) the Exchange Ratio and (y) the volume weighted-average trading price of Parent Common Stock on The Nasdaq Global Select Market (the “NASDAQ”) (as reported byThe Wall Street Journal) for the five (5) full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the Closing Date over (ii) theper-share exercise price of such Company Stock Option, payable as promptly as practicable following the Effective Time. Parent will be entitled to deduct and withhold such amounts as may be required to be deducted and withheld under the Code and any applicable state or local Tax laws as allowed under the applicable Company Benefit Plan and the applicable grant agreement.

2.3Company Restricted Stock Awards. At the Effective Time, each restricted share of Company Common Stock granted under any Company Benefit Plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (a “Company Restricted Stock Award”) shall be or become fully vested and the restrictions thereon shall lapse, and each holder thereof shall be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration in exchange therefor as promptly as practicable following the Effective Time (but in no event later than ten (10) business days thereafter). The Company or Parent will be entitled to deduct and withhold such amounts as may be required or to be deducted and withheld under the Code and any applicable state or local Tax laws as allowed under the applicable Company Benefit Plan and the applicable grant agreement.

2.4Parent to Make Merger Consideration Available. At or prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with a bank or trust company designated by Parent and reasonably acceptable to the Company (the “Exchange Agent”), for the benefit of the holders of Old Certificates, for exchange in accordance with thisArticle II, (a) New Certificates representing the aggregate StockMerger Consideration to be issued pursuant toSection 1.5and exchanged pursuant toSection 2.2(a), 2.1 and (b) cash in an amount sufficient to pay (i) the aggregate Cash Consideration payable to holders of Company Common Stock and (ii)any cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Parent Common Stock (such cash and New Certificates described in the foregoingclauses (a) and(b), together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto, (after giving effect toSection 6.11), being hereinafter referred to as the “Exchange Fund”). The Exchange Agent shall invest any cash included in the Exchange Fund as directed by Parent, Parent;provided that no such investment or losses thereon shall affect the amount of Merger Consideration payable to the holders of Old Certificates. Any interest and other income resulting from such investments shall be solely for the benefit of and paid to Parent.

2.2     2.5Exchange of Shares.

(a) As promptly as practicable after the Effective Time, but in no event later than five (5) business days thereafter, Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of record of one or more Old Certificates representing shares of Company Common Stock immediately prior to the Effective Time that have been converted at the Effective Time into the right to receive the Merger Consideration pursuant toArticle III, a letter of transmittal (which shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the Old Certificates shall pass, only upon proper delivery of the Old Certificates to the Exchange Agent) and instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the Old Certificates in exchange for the Merger Consideration whichthat such holder shall have become entitled to receive in accordance with, and subject to,Section 1.5(a) 2.1, and any cash in lieu of fractional shares whichthat the shares of Company Common Stock represented by such Old Certificate or Old Certificates shall have been converted into the right to receive pursuant to this Agreement as well as any dividends or distributions to be paid pursuant toSection 2.2(b) 2.5(b), in the case of each of the foregoing, subject to all applicable withholding of Tax in accordance withSection 2.8. From and after the Effective Time, upon proper surrender of an Old Certificate or Old Certificates for exchange and cancellation to the Exchange Agent, together with such properly completed letter of transmittal duly executed, the holder of such Old

Certificate or Old Certificates shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor, as applicable, (i) a New Certificate representing the StockMerger Consideration to which such holder of Company Common Stock shall have become entitled to receive in accordance with, and subject to,Section 1.5(a) 2.1, and (ii) a check representing the amount of (1) the Cash Consideration which(A) any cash in lieu of fractional shares that such holder has the right to receive in respect of the surrendered Old Certificate or Old Certificates in accordance with, and subjectpursuant toSection 1.5(a), (2) 2.5(e) and (B) any cash in lieu of fractional shares whichdividends or distributions that such holder has the right to receive in respect of the surrendered Old Certificate or Old Certificates pursuant toSection 2.2(e) and (3) any dividends or distributions which the holder thereof has the right to receive pursuant toSection 2.2(b) 2.5(b), and the Old Certificate or Old Certificates so surrendered shall forthwith be cancelled.canceled. No interest will be paid or accrued on the Cash Consideration, any cash in lieu of fractional shares payable to holders of Old Certificates or any dividends payable underSection 2.2(b) 2.5(b). Until surrendered as contemplated by

thisSection 2.2 2.5, each Old Certificate shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time to represent only the right to receive, upon surrender, the Merger Consideration (together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto and any cash in lieu of fractional shares orissued in respectconsideration therefor), subject to all applicable withholding of dividends or distributions as contemplated by thisTax in accordance withSection 2.2 2.8.

(b) No dividends or other distributions declared with respect to Parent Common Stock with a record date after the Effective Time shall be paid to theany holder of any unsurrendered Old Certificate until the holder thereof shall surrender such Old Certificate in accordance with thisArticle II. After the surrender of an Old Certificate in accordance with thisArticle II, the record holder thereof shall be entitled to receive any such dividends or other distributions, without any interest thereon, which theretofore had become payable with respect to the StockMerger Consideration whichthat the shares of Company Common Stock represented by such Old Certificate have been converted into the right to receive (after giving effect toSection 6.11).receive.

(c) If any New Certificate representing shares of Parent Common Stock is to be issued in a name other than that in which the Old Certificate or Old Certificates surrendered in exchange therefor is or are registered, it shall be a condition of the issuance thereof that the Old Certificate or Old Certificates so surrendered shall be properly endorsed (or accompanied by an appropriate instrument of transfer) and otherwise in proper form for transfer, and that the person requesting such exchange shall pay to the Exchange Agent in advance any transfer or other similar Taxes required by reason of the issuance of a New Certificate representing shares of Parent Common Stock in any name other than that of the registered holder of the Old Certificate or Old Certificates surrendered, or required for any other reason, or shall establish to the satisfaction of the Exchange Agent that such Tax has been paid or is not payable.

(d) After the Effective Time, there shall be no transfers on the stock transfer books of the Company of the shares of Company Common Stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, Old Certificates representing such shares are presented for transfer to the Exchange Agent, they shall be cancelledcanceled and exchanged for the Merger Consideration (together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto and cash in lieu of fractional shares and dividends or distributionsissued in consideration therefor), subject to all applicable withholding of Tax in accordance withSection 2.8, that the holder presenting such Old Certificates is entitled to, as provided in thisArticle II.

(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no New Certificates or scrip representing fractional shares of Parent Common Stock shall be issued upon the surrender for exchange of Old Certificates, no dividend or distribution with respect to Parent Common Stock shall be payable on or with respect to any fractional share, and such fractional share interests shall not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any other rights of a shareholderstockholder of Parent. In lieu of the issuance of any such fractional share, Parent shall, following the Effective Time, pay to each former shareholderstockholder of the Company who otherwise would be entitled to receive such fractional share an amount in cash (rounded to the nearest cent) determined by multiplying (i) the average of the closing-sale pricesvolume weighted-average trading price of Parent Common Stock on The Nasdaq Global Select Market (“the NASDAQ”) (as reported byThe Wall Street Journal) for the five (5) full trading days ending on the last trading day preceding the Closing Date by (ii) the fraction of a share (rounded to the nearest thousandth when expressed in decimal form) of Parent Common Stock whichthat such holder would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant toSection 1.5 2.1.

(f) Any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains unclaimed by the shareholdersstockholders of the Company for one (1) year after the Effective Time shall be paid to the Surviving Corporation.Parent. Any former

shareholders stockholders of the Company who have not theretofore complied with thisArticle II shall thereafter look only to the Surviving CorporationParent for payment of the Merger Consideration (together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto and cash in lieu of any fractional shares and any unpaid dividends and distributions on the Parent Common Stock deliverableissued in consideration therefor) in respect of each former share of Company Common Stock such shareholderstockholder holds as determined pursuant to this Agreement, in each case, without any interest thereon. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Parent, the Company, the Surviving Corporation,Bank, the Exchange Agent or any other person shall be liable to any former holder of shares of Company Common Stock for any amount delivered in good faith to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar laws.

(g) EachIn the event any Old Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such Old Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed, and, if required by the Exchange Agent, the posting by such person of a bond in such amount as the Exchange Agent may require, the Exchange Agent or Parent, as applicable, will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Old Certificate the Merger Consideration (together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto and cash in lieu of fractional shares issued in consideration therefor) in respect thereof pursuant to this Agreement.

2.6Dissenter’s Rights.

(a) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time that are held by any holder who (i) has voted against the Merger or has given notice in writing at or prior to the Company Meeting to the presiding officer of the Company that he, she or it dissents from the Merger (and does not subsequently vote for the Merger), (ii) is entitled to demand and properly demands appraisal of his, her or its Company Common Stock pursuant to §12 U.S.C. 215a and (iii) as of the Effective Time, has not failed to perfect, and has not effectively withdrawn or lost his, her or its rights to appraisal pursuant to §12 U.S.C. 215a (the “Dissenting Shares”) shall be converted into or represent the right to receive the Merger Considerations provided inSection 2.1, and instead the holders of Dissenting Shares shall be entitled to the rights that are granted by §12 U.S.C. 215a (unless and until such holder shall have failed to timely perfect, and shall have effectively withdrawn or lost, such holder’s right to dissent from the Merger under §12 U.S.C. 215a, in which case such holder shall be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration in accordance withSection 2.1, without interest thereon, in exchange for such shares of Company Common Stock, and such shares of Company Common Stock shall no longer be deemed to be Dissenting Shares) and to receive such consideration as may be determined to be due with respect to such Dissenting Shares pursuant to and subject to the requirements of §12 U.S.C. 215a. In such case, at the Effective Time, the Dissenting Shares shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and cease to exist, and each holder of Dissenting Shares shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except as provided for pursuant to §12 U.S.C. 215a and thisSection 2.6.

(b) The Company shall provide Parent any instruments or communications delivered by any holders of Company Common Stock with respect to demands, or attempted withdrawal of demands, for appraisal by such holders and any other instruments received by the Company relating to the Dissenting Shares, and, to the extent permitted by Law, Parent shall have the right to participate in all negotiations and proceedings with respect to such demands. The Company shall not, without the prior written consent of Parent or as otherwise required by an order of a Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction, voluntarily make any payment with respect to or settle any such demands, or waive any failure to timely deliver a written demand, or offer to do any of the foregoing.

2.7Actions of the Company. Prior to the Effective Time, the Company, the Board of Directors of the Company and its compensation committee, as applicable, shall adopt any resolutions and take any actions that are necessary or reasonably desirable, including obtaining any consents, to (i) effectuate the provisions inSections 2.2 and2.3, (ii) ensure that following the Effective Time, there are no obligations with respect to the Company Equity Awards other than as set forth inSections 2.2 and2.3 and (iii) terminate each Company Benefit Plan effective as of the Effective Time;provided that no action taken by the Company shall be required to be irrevocable until immediately prior to the Effective Time.

2.8Tax Withholdings. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, each of Parent and Merger Subthe Bank shall be entitled to deduct and withhold, or cause the Exchange Agent to deduct and withhold, from the Merger Consideration, any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock, cash dividends or distributions payable pursuant to thisSection 2.2 2.5 or any other amounts otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement to any holder of Company Common Stockperson such amounts as it determines it is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of such payment under the Code or any provision of state, local or foreign Tax law. To the extent that amounts are so

withheld by Parent, Merger Subthe Bank or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be, and paid over to the appropriate governmental authority,Governmental Entity, the withheld amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of Company Common Stockperson in respect of which the deduction and withholding was made by Parent, Merger Subthe Bank or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be.

(h)     In the event any Old Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such Old Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if requested by Parent, the posting by such person of a bond in such amount as Parent may determine is reasonably necessary as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such Old Certificate, the Exchange Agent or Parent, as applicable, will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Old Certificate the Merger Consideration and any cash in lieu of fractional shares deliverable in respect thereof pursuant to this Agreement.

ARTICLE III

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY

Except (i) as disclosed in the disclosure schedule delivered by the Company to Parent concurrently herewith (the “Company Disclosure Schedule”);provided, that (a)(i) no such item is required to be set forth as an exception to a representation or warranty if its absence would not result in the related representation or warranty being deemed untrue or incorrect, (b)(ii) the mere inclusion of an item in the Company Disclosure Schedule as an exception to a representation or warranty shall not be deemed an admission by the Company that such item represents a material exception or fact, event or circumstance or that such item is reasonably likely to result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company and (c)(iii) any disclosures made with respect to a section ofArticle III shall be deemed to qualify (1) any other section ofArticle III (A) specifically referenced or cross-referenced and (2) other sections ofArticle IIIor (B) to the extent it is reasonably apparent on its face (notwithstanding the absence of a specific cross-reference) from a reading of the disclosure that such disclosure applies to such other sections, or (ii) as disclosed in any Company Reports publicly filed by the Company since December 31, 2014, and prior to the date hereof (but disregarding risk factor disclosures contained under the heading “Risk Factors,” or disclosures of risks set forth in any “forward-looking statements” disclaimer or any other statements that are similarly non-specific or cautionary, predictive or forward-looking in nature), the Company hereby represents and warrants to Parent as follows:

3.1Corporate Organization.

(a) The Company is a corporationchartered commercial bank duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and is a savings and loan holding company duly registered with the Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) under the Home Owners Loan Act of 1933, as amended (“HOLA”).Jersey. The Company has the corporate power and authority to own or lease all of its properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. The Company is duly licensed or qualified to do business in each jurisdiction in which the nature of the business conducted by it or the character or location of the properties and assets owned or leased by it makes such licensing or qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so licensed or qualified would not, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. As used in this Agreement, the termherein,Material Adverse Effect” means, with respect to Parent the Company or the Surviving Corporation,Company, as the case may be, a material adverse effect on (i) the business, properties, assets, liabilities, results of operations or financial condition of such party and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole (provided,however, that, with respect to thisclause (i), Material Adverse Effect shall not be deemed to include the impact of (A) changes, after the date hereof, in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) or applicable regulatory accounting requirements, (B) changes, after the date hereof, in laws, rules or regulations of general applicability to companies in the industries in which such party and its Subsidiaries operate, or interpretations thereof by courts or Governmental Entities, (C) changes, after the date hereof, in global, national or regional political conditions (including the outbreak of war or acts of terrorism) or in economic or market conditions affecting the financial services industry generally and not specifically relating to such party or its Subsidiaries, (D) public disclosure of the transactions contemplated hereby or actions expressly required by this Agreement or actions or omissions that are taken with the prior written consent of the other party in contemplation of the transactions contemplated hereby;hereby or (E) the reasonable, customary and documented third party expenses incurred by either party in negotiating, documenting, effecting and consummating the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; except, with respect tosubclauses (A),(B) and(C), to the extent that the effects of such changes are materially disproportionately adverse toaffect the business, properties, assets, liabilities, results of operations or financial condition of such party and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as compared to other companies in the industry in which such party and its Subsidiaries operate) or (ii) the ability of such party to timely consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. As used in this Agreement, the wordherein,Subsidiary,” when used with respect to any person, means any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, bank or other organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated, or person of which (i)(x) such first person directly or indirectly owns or controls at least a majority of the securities or other interests having by their terms ordinary voting power to elect a majority

of the board of directors or others performing similar functions or (ii)(y) such first person is or directly or indirectly has the power to appoint a general partner, manager or managing member or others performing similar functions.

(b) True, correct and complete copies of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (the “Company Certificate”) and the Bylaws of the Company, as amended (the “Company Bylaws”), as in effect as of the date of this Agreement, have previously been made available by the Company to Parent.

(b)     Company Bank isExhibit E sets forth a federal savings bank duly organized, validly existingtrue, correct and in good standing under the lawscomplete list of each branch of the United States.Company as of the date hereof and the related address. The minute books of the Company and its Subsidiaries accurately reflect, in all material respects, all material corporate actions of the stockholders and boards of directors or managers (and committees thereof) of the Company or its Subsidiaries, as applicable.

(c) The Company has previously made available to Parent true, correct and complete copies of (i) its annual reports to its stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and (ii) proxy materials distributed to its stockholders in connection with any annual or special meeting of its stockholders held in 2018, 2017 and 2016.

(d) The deposits of the Company Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) through the Deposit Insurance Fund to the fullest extent permitted by law,Law, all premiums and assessments required to be paid in connection therewith have been paid when due and no proceedings for the termination of such insurance are pending or threatened. The Company Bank is a member in good standing of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (the “FHLB”) and owns the requisite amount of stock therein. Without duplication of the representations made by the Company in each of the foregoing sentences of thisSection 3.1(b), each

(e) Each Subsidiary of the Company (each, a “CompanySubsidiary”), (i) is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of its jurisdiction of organization, (ii) is duly qualified to do business and, where such concept is recognized under applicable law,Law, is in good standing in all jurisdictions (whether federal, state, local or foreign) where its ownership or leasing of property or the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified, and in whichexcept where the failure to be so qualified or in good standing would not, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company and (iii) has all requisite company, partnership or corporate (as applicable) power and authority to own or lease its properties and assets and to carry on its business as now conducted. There are no restrictions on the ability of any Subsidiary of the Company to pay dividends or distributions except, in the case of a Subsidiary that is a regulated entity, for restrictions on dividends or distributions generally applicable to all such regulated entities.Section 3.1(b) 3.1(e) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true, correct and complete list of all Subsidiaries of the Company as of the date hereof.

3.2Capitalization.

(a) The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 25,000,00010,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value, of which no shares of preferred stock are issued or outstanding.Stock. As of the date of this Agreement, there are (i) 6,412,678(v) 2,533,779 shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding, which number includes 25,620 shares of Company Common Stock granted in respect of outstanding Company Restricted Stock Awards and 58,993 shares of Company Common Stock held by the Company in trust for issuance pursuant to outstanding Company Deferred Stock Units (which shares satisfy in full the Company’s obligation with respect to the Company Deferred Stock Units), (ii) 894,912(w) 215,382 shares of Company Common Stock held in treasury, (iii) 368,627(x) 33,075 shares of Company Common Stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of the outstanding Company Stock Options, (y) 66,075 shares of Company Common Stock outstanding in respect of Company Restricted Stock Awards (which shares of Company Common Stock are included in the number of shares of Company Common Stock issued and (iv)outstanding set forth inclause (v) of thisSection 3.2(a)) and (z) no other shares of capital stock or other equity or voting securities of the Company issued, reserved for issuance or outstanding. All of the issued and outstanding shares of Company Common Stock have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable and free of any preemptive rights, with no personal liability attaching to the ownership thereof. There are no bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness that have the right to vote on any matters on which shareholdersstockholders of the Company may vote. There are no trust preferred or subordinated debt securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries issued or outstanding. Other than the Company Stock Options and the Company Restricted Stock Awards and(together, the Company Deferred Stock Units,EquityAwards”), in each case, issued prior to the date of this Agreement, as of the date of this Agreement, there are no outstanding subscriptions, options,

warrants, puts, calls, rights, exchangeable or convertible securities or other commitments or agreements obligating the Company to issue, transfer, sell, purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any such securities. ThereThe Company is not party to, and, to the Company’s knowledge, there are no, voting trusts, shareholderstockholder agreements, proxies or other agreements in effect with respect to the voting or transfer of Company Common Stock or other equity interests of the Company, other than the VotingSupport Agreements. The Company has, in connection with the offering and sale of any securities of the Company, complied in all material respects with all applicable federal and state securities laws, rules and regulations.Section 3.2(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth (as of the date hereof) a true, correct and complete list of all the (i) issued and outstanding shares of Company Common Stock, specifying, on aholder-by-holder basis, (A) the name of each holder and (B) the number of shares held by such holder and (ii) Company Equity Awards and Company Deferred Stock Units issued and outstanding under any Company EquityBenefit Plan, as of the date hereof, specifying, on aholder-by-holder basis, (A) the name of each holder, (B) the number of shares subject to each such award,Company Equity Award, (C) the grant date of each such award,Company Equity Award, (D) the vesting schedule for each such award,Company Equity Award, (E) the exercise price for each such awardCompany Equity Award that is a Company Stock Option and (F) the expiration date for each such awardCompany Equity Award that is a Company Stock Option. Other than the Company Equity Awards, and Company Deferred Stock Units, no equity-based awards (including any cash awards where the amount of payment is determined in whole or in part based on the price of any capital stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries) are outstanding.

(b) The Company owns, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock or other equity ownership interests of each of the Company Subsidiaries, free and clear of any liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances and security interests whatsoever (“Liens”), and all of such shares or equity ownership interests are duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable (except, with respect to bank Subsidiaries, as provided under 12 U.S.C. § 55 or any comparable provision of applicable federal or state law) and free of preemptive rights, with no personal liability attaching to the ownership thereof. No Company Subsidiary has or is bound by any outstanding subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, rights, commitments or agreements of any character calling for the purchase or issuance of any shares of capital stock or any other equity security of such Subsidiary or any securities representing the right to purchase or otherwise receive any shares of capital stock or any other equity security of such Subsidiary.

(c)Section 3.2(c) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true, correct and complete list of each offer to purchase shares of Company Common Stock made by the Company (each a “Company Tender Offer”), including, in each case, the date of the commencement of such Company Tender Offer, the maximum amount of shares subject to such Company Tender Offer and the total amount of shares repurchased pursuant thereto. The Company has not purchased shares of Company Common Stock other than pursuant to and in accordance with such Company Tender Offer and all Laws with respect thereto.

(d)Section 3.2(d) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true, correct and complete list of each offering of equity securities (or securities convertible or exchangeable into, or exercisable for, equity securities) of the Company (other than issuances of (x) Company Equity Awards pursuant to a Company Benefit Plan and (y) issuances of shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of Company Stock Options or warrants) made by the Company (each a “Company Offering”), including a description of the securities issued, the date of issuance, the amount of shares issued, the use of proceeds and the offering price. Each Company Offering was effected in compliance with all Laws with respect thereto, in all material respects.

3.3Authority; No Violation.

(a) The Company has full corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the Integrated Mergers haveMerger has been duly, validly and validlyunanimously approved by the Board of Directors of the Company by a vote of at least two-thirds of the entire Board of Directors of the Company. The Board of Directors of the Company has (i) determined that the Integrated Mergers,Merger, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, areis advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, hasstockholders, (ii) adopted this Agreement, and has(iii) directed that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby be submitted to the

Company’s shareholdersstockholders for approval at a duly called and convened meeting of such shareholders

stockholders, (iv) recommended that the stockholders of the Company approve and hasadopt this Agreement and the transactions contemplated herein at such meeting and (v) adopted a resolution to the foregoing effect. Except for the approval of this Agreement by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast by the holders of at leasttwo-thirds of the sharescapital stock of the Company Common Stock entitled to vote at the Company Meeting (the “Requisite Company Vote”), no other corporate proceedings or approvals on the part of the Company are necessary to approve this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the Company and (assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by Parent)Parent and the Bank) constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms (except in all cases as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, reorganization or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and the availability of equitable remedies (the “Enforceability Exceptions”)).

(b) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company, nor the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor compliance by the Company with anyeach of the terms orand provisions hereof will (i) violate any provision of the Company Certificate or the Company Bylaws or any governing or organizational document of any of the Company’s Subsidiaries or (ii) assuming that the consents and approvals referred to inSection 3.4 are duly obtained, (x) violate any statute, code, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, order, writ, decree or injunction applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets or (y) except as set forth inSection 3.3(b) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, violate, conflict with, result in a breach of any provision of or the loss of any benefit under, constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a default) under, result in the termination of or a right of termination or cancellation under, accelerate the performance required by, or result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the respective properties or assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any contract, note, bond, mortgage, indenture, deed of trust, license, lease, agreement or other instrument or obligation to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party, or by which they or any of their respective properties or assets may be bound, except (in the case ofclause (y) above) for such violations, conflicts, breaches or defaults which, either individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.

(c)     The Board of Directors of Company Bank has adopted the Bank Merger Agreement. The Company, as the sole shareholder of Company Bank, has approved the Bank Merger Agreement, and the Bank Merger Agreement has been duly executed by Company Bank.

3.4Consents and Approvals. Except for (a) the filing of applications, filings, certificates and notices, as applicable, with the NASDAQ and the approval of the listing on the NASDAQ of the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued as the Merger Consideration pursuant to this Agreement, (b) the filing of applications, filings, certificates and notices, as applicable, with the Federal Reserve Board under the HOLABHC Act and approval of such applications, filings and notices, (c) the filing of applications, filings, certificates and notices, as applicable, with the OfficeOCC, including filing of the ComptrollerNotice of Consummation with the Currency (the “OCC”), pursuant to the National Bank Act, and approval of such applications, filings and notices, (d) the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) of (i) any filings that are necessary under applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), includingand (ii) the filing of a jointregistration statement on FormS-4 in which the proxy statement in definitive form relating to the meetingsmeeting of the Company’s and Parent’s shareholdersstockholders to be held in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby (including any amendmentsamendment or supplementssupplement thereto, the “Joint Proxy Statement”), and (ii)a prospectus relating to the registration statement on Form S-4shares of Parent Common Stock issuable in which the Joint Proxy StatementMerger will be included, as a prospectus, to be filed with the SEC by Parent in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the “S-4”) and declaration of effectiveness of theS-4, (e) the filing of the First-Step Merger Certificateapplications, filings, certificates and notices, as applicable, with the New Jersey Secretary pursuant to the BCA,Department of Banking and Insurance (the “NJ Department”) and (f) the filing of the Second-Step Merger Certificates with the Delaware Secretary and the New Jersey Secretary in accordance with the DGCL and the BCA, respectively, (g) the filing of the Bank Merger Certificate and (h) such filings and approvals as are required to be made or obtained under the securities or “Blue Sky” laws of various states in connection with the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement, no consents or approvals of or filings or registrations with any court, administrative agency or commission or other governmental authority or instrumentality or any self-regulatory organization (each, a “Governmental Entity”) or any other third party are necessary in connection with (A) the execution and delivery by the Company of this Agreement or (B) the

consummation by the Company of the Integrated MergersMerger and the other transactions contemplated hereby (includinghereby. The Company is not under any obligation, contingent or otherwise, that will survive the Bank Merger)Effective Time by reason of any agreement to register any transaction involving any of its securities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

3.5Reports. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries have timely filed all reports, registrations and statements, together with any amendments required to be made with respect thereto, that they were required to file since January 1, 20132015 with (a) any state regulatory authority, including the NJ Department, (b) the SEC, (c) the Federal Reserve Board, (d) the FDIC, (e) the OCC, (f) any foreign regulatory authority and (g) any self-regulatory organization ((a) – (g), collectively “Regulatory Agencies”), including without limitation, any report, registration or statement required to be filed pursuant to the laws, rules or regulations of the United States, any state, any foreign entity or any Regulatory Agency, and have paid in full all fees and assessments due and payable in connection therewith, except where the failure to file such report, registration or statement or to pay such fees and assessments, either individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Except as set forth inSection 3.5 of the Company Disclosure Schedule and for normal examinations conducted by a Regulatory Agency in the ordinary course of business of the Company and its Subsidiaries, (i) no Regulatory Agency has initiated or has pending any proceeding or, to the knowledge of the Company, investigation into the business or operations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries since January 1, 2013,2015, except where such proceedings or investigation would not reasonably be expected to be, either individually or in the aggregate, material to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (ii) there is no unresolved violation, criticism, or exception by any Regulatory Agency with respect to any report or statement relating to any examinations or inspections of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and (iii) there has been no formal or informal inquiries by, or disagreements or disputes with, any Regulatory Agency with respect to the business, operations, policies or procedures of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries since January 1, 2013,2015, in each case, which would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. The Company and its Subsidiaries have fully resolved in all material respects all “matters requiring attention,” “matters requiring immediate attention” or similar items as identified, if any, by any such Regulatory Agency.

3.6Financial Statements.

(a) The financial statementsCompany has previously made available to Parent a true and complete copy of the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company and its Subsidiaries included (or incorporated by reference) inas at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and the related audited consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows of the Company Reports (includingand its Subsidiaries for each of the years then ended, together with all related notes and schedules thereto, accompanied by the reports thereon of the Company’s independent auditors (collectively referred to as the “Financial Statements”) and the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of the Company and its Subsidiaries as at June 30, 2018 (the “Balance Sheet”), and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows of the Company and its Subsidiaries for the six months ended June 30, 2018, together with all related notes where applicable)and schedules thereto (together with the Balance Sheet, the “Interim Financial Statements”). Each of the Financial Statements and the Interim Financial Statements (i) have beenwas prepared from, and areis in accordance with, the books and records of the Company and its Subsidiaries, (ii) fairly presentpresents in all material respects the consolidated results of operations, cash flows, changes in shareholders’stockholders’ equity and consolidated financial position of the Company and its Subsidiaries for the respective fiscal periods orand as of the respective dates therein set forth (subject in the case of unaudited statements toyear-end audit adjustments normal in nature and amount), (iii) complied, as of theirits respective dates of filing with the SEC,date, in all material respects with all applicable accounting requirements and with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto, and (iv) have beenwas prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently applied during the periods involved, except, in each case, as indicated in such statements or in the notes thereto. The books and records of the Company and its Subsidiaries have been, and are being, maintained in all material respects in accordance with GAAP and any other applicable legal and accounting requirements and reflect only actual transactions. Deloitte & ToucheRSM US LLP, the Company’s independent auditor, has not resigned (or informed the Company that it intends to resign) or been dismissed as independent public accountants of the Company as a result of or in connection with any disagreements with the Company on a matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure.

(b) Except (i) as would not reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company or (ii) as set forth inSection 3.6(b) of the Company Disclosure

Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has any liability of any nature whatsoever (whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise and whether due or to become due), except for those liabilities that are reflected or reserved against on the consolidated balance sheet of the Company included in its Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2016Balance Sheet (including any notes thereto) and for liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice since March 31, 2016,the date of the Balance Sheet or in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.

(c) The records, systems, controls, data and information of the Company and its Subsidiaries are recorded, stored, maintained and operated under means (including any electronic, mechanical or photographic process, whether computerized or not) that are under the exclusive ownership and direct control of the Company or its Subsidiaries or their accountants (including all means of access thereto and therefrom), except for anynon-exclusive ownership andnon-direct control that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. The Company (x) has implemented(i) keeps books, records and maintains disclosure controlsaccounts that, in reasonable detail, accurately and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) underfairly reflect the Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating totransactions and dispositions of the Company, including its Subsidiaries, is made known to the chief executive officer and the chief financial officerassets of the Company by others within those entitiesand its Subsidiaries, and (ii) maintains a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that (A) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, (B) transactions are recorded as appropriatenecessary to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosurespermit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to makemaintain accountability for assets, (C) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization and (D) the certifications required byrecorded accountability for assets is compared with the Exchange Actexisting assets at reasonable intervals and Sections 302 and 906appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.Section 3.6(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), and (y) has disclosed,Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth, based on itsthe Company’s most recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to the Company’s outside auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (i)(x) any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) whichaccounting controls that are reasonably likely to adversely affect in any material respect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and (ii)(y) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves directors, management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal accounting controls, over financial reporting. These disclosures were made in writing by managementeach case, disclosed to the Company’s auditors, andthe audit committee and a copy has previously been made available to Parent. As of the dateBoard of this Agreement, there is no reason to believe that the Company’s outside auditors and its chief executive officer and chief financial officer will not be able to give the certifications and attestations required pursuant to the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to Section 404Directors of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, without qualification, when next due.Company or any Governmental Entity.

(d) Since January 1, 2013,2016, (i) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor, to the knowledge of the Company, any director, officer, auditor, accountant or representative of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, has received or otherwise had or obtained knowledge of any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim, whether written or oral, regarding the accounting or auditing practices, procedures, methodologies or methods (including with respect to loan loss reserves, write-downs, charge-offs and accruals) of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or their respective internal accounting controls, including any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has engaged in questionable accounting or auditing practices and (ii) no attorney representing the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a material violation of securities laws, breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation by the Company or any of its officers, directors, employees or agents to the Board of Directors of the Company or any committee thereof or, to the knowledge of the Company, to any director or officer of the Company.

3.7Broker’s Fees. With the exception of the engagement of Sandler O’NeillBoenning & Partners, L.P.Scattergood Inc., neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary nor any of their respective officers or directors has employed any broker, finder or financial advisor or incurred any liability for any broker’s fees, commissions or finder’s fees in connection with the Integrated MergersMerger or relatedthe other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Company has disclosed to Parent as of the date hereof the aggregate fees provided for in connection with the engagement by the Company of Sandler O’NeillBoenning & Partners, L.P.,Scattergood Inc. related to the Integrated MergersMerger and the other transactions contemplated hereunder.

3.8Absence of Certain Changes or Events.

(a) Since December 31, 2015,2017, no event or events have occurred that have had or would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.

(b) Since December 31, 2015,2017, except with respect to (i) matters set forth inSection 3.8(b) of the Company Disclosure Schedule and (ii) the transactions contemplated hereby, the Company and its Subsidiaries have carried on their respective businesses in all material respects in the ordinary course.

course of business.

(c) Since December 31, 2017, except with respect to matters set forth inSection 3.8(c) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor its Subsidiaries have taken any action or failed to take any action that would have resulted in a breach ofSection 5.2 had such act or omission occurred during the period from the date hereof to the Closing.

3.9Legal Proceedings.

(a) NeitherExcept as set forth inSection 3.9(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any, and there are no pending or, to the Company’s knowledge of the Company, threatened, legal, administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims, actions or governmental or regulatory investigations of any material nature against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their current or former directors or executive officers or challenging the validity or propriety of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(b) There is no injunction, order, judgment, decree or regulatory restriction imposed upon the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or the assets, rights or properties of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (or that, upon consummation of the Integrated Mergers,Merger, would apply to the Surviving CorporationParent or any of its affiliates), that would reasonably be expected to be material to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.Company.

3.10Taxes and Tax Returns.

(a) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has duly and timely filed or caused to be filed (giving effect to all applicable extensions) all material Tax Returns required to be filed by any of them, and all such Tax Returns are true, correct and complete in all material respects.

(b) All material Taxes of the Company and its Subsidiaries that are due have been fully and timely paid or adequate reserves therefor have been made in accordance with GAAP on the financial statementsFinancial Statements or Interim Financial Statements of the Company and its Subsidiaries included (or incorporated by reference) in the Company Reports (including the related notes, where applicable).Subsidiaries. Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has withheld and paid to the relevant Governmental Entity on a timely basis all material Taxes required to have been withheld and paid in connection with amounts paid or owing to any person. All deficiencies asserted or assessments made as a result of any audit, assessment, claim, examination, investigation or other inquiry relating to Taxes by any Governmental Entity of the Tax Returns of the Company or its Subsidiaries have been fully paid or are being contested in good faith through appropriate proceedings and have been adequately reserved for in accordance with GAAP in the Financial Statements or the Interim Financial Statements.

(c) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has incurred any material liability for Taxes since the date of the latest Interim Financial Statements outside of the ordinary course of business.

(d) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has nexus or a Tax presence in any jurisdiction in which it is not currently filing Tax Returns. No claim has been made in writing by any Governmental Entity in a jurisdiction where the Company or any of its Subsidiaries does not file Tax Returns that the Company or such subsidiary is or may be subject to taxation by that jurisdiction.

(d)(e) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has requested or received any extension of time within which to file any material Tax Return, which Tax Return has not since been filed. No extension or waiver of the limitation period applicable to any material Tax Return of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has been granted by or requested from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that is still outstanding.

(f) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries is, and has been since its respective date of formation, organized or incorporated under the laws of a state or political subdivision of the United States. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is or has been subject to Tax in any jurisdiction outside of the United States. Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary conducts or has conducted any business or other operations outside of the United States.

(g) There are no material Liens for Taxes on any of the assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries other than Liens for Taxes not yet due and payable.

(e)(h) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received written notice of assessment or proposed assessment in connection with any material amount of Taxes, and there are no threatened in writing or pending disputes, claims, audits, examinations, investigations, or other proceedings regarding any material TaxTaxes of the Company and its Subsidiaries or the assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries which have not been paid, settled or withdrawn or for which adequate reserves have not been established.established in accordance with GAAP in the Financial Statements or the Interim Financial Statements.

(f)(i) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries will be required to include any item of income in, or exclude any item of deduction from, taxable income for any taxable year (or portion thereof) ending after the Closing Date as a result of any (i) change in method of accounting for a taxable period ending on or prior to the Closing Date; (ii) use of an improper method of accounting for a taxable period ending on or prior to the Closing Date; (iii) “closing agreement” as described in Section 7127 of the Code (or any corresponding or similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law) executed on or prior to the Closing Date; (iv) intercompany transaction or any excess loss account in respect of taxable periods ending on or prior to the Closing Date described in Treasury regulationsRegulations promulgated under Section 1502 of the Code (or any corresponding or similar provision of state, local or non- U.S.foreign Tax law), (ii)Law); (v) installment sale or open transaction made on or prior to the Closing Date or (iii)Date; (vi) prepaid amount received on or prior to the Closing Date.Date; (vii) election made under Section 108(i) of the Code prior to the Closing Date; (viii) application of Section 965 of the Code, including any election made under Section 965(h) of the Code; or (ix) any similar election, action, or agreement that would have the effect of deferring any liability for Taxes of the Company from any period ending on or before the Closing Date to any period ending after such date.

(g)(j) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or is bound by any Tax sharing, allocation or indemnification agreement or arrangement (other than such an agreement or arrangement exclusively between or among the Company and its Subsidiaries). Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries (i) has been a member of an affiliated group filing a consolidated federal income Tax Return (other than a group of which the Company was the common parent) or (ii) has any liability for the Taxes of any person (other than the Company or any of its Subsidiaries) arising from the application of Treasury regulation Section Regulation section1.1502-6, or any similar provision of state, local or foreign law, as a transferee or successor, by contract or otherwise.

(k) Except as set forth inSection 3.10(k) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is, or has been since the date of its formation, a party to or a member of any joint venture, partnership, limited liability company, trust or other arrangement or contract which could be treated as a partnership for Tax purposes.

(l) There is no power of attorney given by or binding upon the Company or any of its Subsidiaries with respect to Taxes for any period for which the statute of limitations (including any waivers or extensions) has not yet expired that is currently in effect.

(h)(m) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has distributedconstituted either a “distributing corporation” or a “controlled corporation” in a distribution of stock to another Person, or has had its stock distributed by another Person during the two-year period ending on the date hereof that was intended to be governed in whole or in part byqualify fortax-free treatment under Section 355 of the Code.Code in the two years prior to the date of this Agreement.

(i)     Neither

(n) The Company is not and has not been, during the Company nor anyapplicable period specified in Section 897(c)(1)(A)(ii) of its Subsidiaries has taken any action, or knows of any fact or circumstance, that could reasonably be expected to prevent the Integrated Mergers, taken together, from being treated as an integrated transaction that qualifies asCode, a “reorganization”“United States real property holding corporation” within the meaning of Section 368(a)897(c)(2) of the Code.

(j)(o) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries have disclosed on their respective federal income Tax Returns all positions taken therein that could give rise to a substantial understatement of Tax within the meaning of Section 6662 of the Code. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has engaged in any “reportable transaction” within the meaning of Treasury Regulation section 1.6011-4(b)1.6011-4(b)(1). or any similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law.

(k)(p) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has undergone an “ownership change” within the meaning of Section 382(g) of the Code within the past five years.

(l)(q) As used in this Agreement, the termherein,Tax” or “Taxes” means (i) all U.S. federal, state, and local, and foreign taxes, fees assessments or other charges of a similar nature (whethertaxes imposed directlyby any Governmental Entity, including all income, gross receipts, license, payroll, employment, escheat, excise, severance, stamp, occupation, premium, windfall profits, environmental, customs duties, capital stock, ad valorem, value added, inventory, franchise, profits, withholding, social security (or similar), unemployment, disability, real property, personal property, sales, use, transfer, registration, alternative or through withholding),add-on minimum, or estimated taxes, and including any interest, additionspenalty, or addition thereto and (ii) any amounts described inclause (i) of this definition (x) as a result of being prior to taxthe Closing a member of an affiliated, consolidated, combined, unitary or penaltiesother similar group, (y) as a result of being prior to the Closing a party to any Tax sharing or Tax allocation agreement or other similar arrangement (other than customary commercial contracts not primarily related thereto.to Taxes) or (z) as a result of being liable for another person’s Taxes as a transferee or successor.

(m)(r) As used in this Agreement, the termherein,Tax Return” means any return, declaration, report, claim for refund, or information return or statement relating to Taxes, including any schedule or attachment thereto, and including any amendment thereof, supplied or required to be supplied to a Governmental Entity.

3.11Employees.

(a)Section 3.11(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule listssets forth a true, correct and complete list of all Company Benefit Plans. For purposes of this Agreement, “Company Benefit Plans” mean all employee benefit plans (as defined in Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”)), whether or not subject to ERISA, whether funded or unfunded, and all pension, benefit, retirement, bonus, stock option, stock purchase, employee stock ownership, restricted stock, stock-based, performance award, phantom equity, incentive, deferred compensation, retiree medical or life insurance, supplemental retirement, severance, retention, employment, consulting, termination, change in control, salary continuation, accrued leave, sick leave, vacation, paid time off, health, medical, disability, life, accidental death and dismemberment, insurance, welfare, fringe benefit and other similar plans, programs, policies, practices or arrangements or other contracts or agreements (and any amendments thereto) to or with respect to which the Company or any Subsidiary or any trade or business of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not incorporated, all of which together with the Company would be deemed a “single employer” within the meaning of Section 4001 of ERISA (a “Company ERISA Affiliate”), is a party or has or could reasonably be expected to have any current or future obligation or that are sponsored, maintained, contributed to or required to be contributed to by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any Company ERISA Affiliate for the benefit of any current or former employee, officer, director, consultant or independent contractor (or any spouse or dependent of such individual) of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any Company ERISA Affiliate.Subsidiaries.

(b) The Company has heretofore made available to Parent true, correct and complete copies of the following documents with respect to each of the Company Benefit Plans, to the extent applicable,applicable: (i) the plan document (including all plans and trust agreements, (ii) all summary plan descriptions, amendments modifications or material supplements to anythereto) governing such Company Benefit Plan (iii) where anyor, if such Company Benefit Plan hasis not been reduced toin writing, a written summarydescription of all the material terms of such Company Benefit Plan, (ii) if the Company Benefit Plan is funded through a trust or any other funding arrangement, a copy of such trust of

other funding arrangement, (iii) each ERISA summary plan terms, (iii)description and summary of material modifications, (iv) the annual report (Form 5500), if any, filed with the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) for the last three (3) plan years and summary annual reports, with schedules and financial statements attached, (iv)(v) the most recently received IRS determination or opinion letter, if any, relating to any Company Benefit Plan, (v)(vi) the most recently prepared actuarial report for each Company Benefit Plan (if applicable) for each of the last three (3) years and (vi)(vii) copies of all material notices, letters or othernon-routine correspondence withto and from the IRS, U.S. Department of Labor (the “DOL”) or Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (the “PBGC”).

(c) Each Company Benefit Plan has been established, operated and administered in all material respects in accordance with its terms and the requirements of all applicable laws,Laws, including ERISA and the Code. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has taken any action to take corrective action or made a filing under any voluntary correction program of the IRS, the DOL or any other Governmental Entity with respect to any Company Benefit Plan, and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has any knowledge of any plan defect that would qualify for correction under any such program.

(d)Section 3.11(d) of the Company Disclosure Schedule identifiessets forth a true, correct and complete list of each Company Benefit Plan that is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code (the “Company Qualified Plans”). The IRS has issued a favorable determination or opinion letter with respect to each Company Qualified Plan and the related trust, which letter has not been revoked (nor has revocation been threatened), and, to the knowledge of the Company, there are no existing circumstances and no events have occurred that could adversely affect the qualified status of any Company Qualified Plan or the exempt status of the related trust or increase the costs relating thereto. No trust funding any Company Benefit Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 501(c)(9) of the Code.

(e) Each Company Benefit Plan that is subject to Section 409A of the Code has been administered and documented in compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, except where anynon-compliance has not and cannot reasonably be expected to result in material liability to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.

(f) With respect to eachNo Company Benefit Plan is, and none of the Company, its Subsidiaries nor any Company ERISA Affiliate (as defined below) has at any time during the last six years sponsored, maintained, contributed to or been obligated to contribute to any plan that is, subject to Title IV or Section 302 of ERISA or Sections 412, 430 or 4971 of the Code: (i) no such plan is in “at-risk” status forCode. For purposes of Section 430 ofthis Agreement, the Code, (ii)term “Company ERISA Affiliate” means any trade or business, whether or not incorporated, that together with the present value of accrued benefits under such Company Benefit Plan, based upon the actuarial assumptions used for funding purposes in the most recent actuarial report prepared by such Company Benefit Plan’s actuary with respect to such Company Benefit Plan, did not, as of its latest valuation date, exceed the then current fair market value of the assets of such Company Benefit Plan allocable to such accrued benefits, (iii) no reportable eventwould be deemed a “single employer” within the meaning of Section 4043(c)4001 of ERISA for which the 30-day notice requirement has not been waived has occurred, (iv) all premiums to the PBGC have been timely paid in full, (v) no liability (other than for premiums to the PBGC) under Title IV of ERISA has been or is expected to be incurred by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and (vi) the PBGC has not instituted proceedings to terminate any such Company Benefit Plan.ERISA.

(g) None of the Company, its Subsidiaries nor any Company ERISA Affiliate has, at any time during the last six years, contributed to or been obligated to contribute to any plan that is a “multiemployer plan” within the meaning of Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA (a “Multiemployer Plan”) or a plan that has two or more contributing sponsors at least two of whom are not under common control, within the meaning of Section 4063 of ERISA (a “MultipleEmployer Plan”), and none of the Company and its Subsidiaries nor any Company ERISA Affiliate has incurred any liability to a Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer Plan as a result of a complete or partial withdrawal (as those terms are defined in Part 1 of Subtitle E of Title IV of ERISA) from a Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer Plan.

(h) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries sponsors, has sponsored or has any obligation with respect to any employee benefit plan that provides for any post-employment or post-retirement health or medical or life insurance benefits for retired, former or current employees or beneficiaries or dependents thereof, except as required by Section 4980B of the Code.

(i) All contributions required to be made to any Company Benefit Plan by applicable lawLaw or by any plan document or other contractual undertaking, and all premiums due or payable with respect to insurance policies

funding any Company Benefit Plan, in each case, for any period through the date hereof, have been timely made or paid in full or, to the extent not required to be made or paid on or before the date hereof, have been fully reflected on the books and records of the Company.Company to the extent required by GAAP.

(j) There are no pending or threatened claims (other than claims for benefits in the ordinary course)course of business), lawsuits or arbitrations that have been asserted or instituted, and, to the Company’s knowledge of the Company, no set of circumstances exists that may reasonably be expected to give rise to a claim, lawsuit or arbitration, against the Company Benefit Plans, any fiduciaries thereof with respect to their duties to the Company Benefit Plans or the assets of any of the trusts under any of the Company Benefit Plans, in each case that could reasonably be expected to result in any material liability of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to the PBGC, the IRS, the DOL, any Multiemployer Plan, a Multiple Employer Plan, any participant in any Company Benefit Plan, or any other party.

(k) None of the Company and its Subsidiaries nor any Company ERISA Affiliate nor any other person, including any fiduciary, has engaged in any “prohibited transaction” (as defined in Section 4975 of the Code or Section 406 of ERISA), which could subject any of the Company Benefit Plans or their related trusts, the Company, any of its Subsidiaries, any Company ERISA Affiliate or any person that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has an obligation to indemnify, to any material tax or penalty imposed under Section 4975 of the Code or Section 502 of ERISA.

(l) NeitherExcept as set forth inSection 3.11(l) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will (either alone or in conjunction with any other event) result in, cause the vesting, exercisability, delivery or funding of, or increase in the amount or value of, any payment, compensation (including stock or stock-based), right or other benefit to any employee, officer, director, independent contractor, consultant or other service provider of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or result in any limitation on the right of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to amend, merge, terminate or receive a reversion of assets from any Company Benefit Plan or related trust. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no amount paid or payable (whether in cash, in property, or in the form of benefits) by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby (either solely as a result thereof or as a result of such transactions in conjunction with any other event) will (i) be an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries maintains or contributes to a rabbi trust or similar funding vehicle, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will not cause or require the Company or any of its affiliates to establish or make any contribution to a rabbi trust or similar funding vehicle.

(m)     No Company Benefit Plan provides for the gross-up or reimbursement of Taxes under Section 409A or 4999 of the Code or otherwise.(ii) require prior approval in accordance with FDIC regulation 12 C.F.R. Part 359, Golden Parachute and Indemnification Payments. The Company has made available to Parent true, correct and complete copies of Section 280G calculations assuming that the Merger occurs on or after January 1, 2019 (whether or not final) with respect to any disqualified individual in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby.

(n)(m) No Company Benefit Plan provides for thegross-up or reimbursement of Taxes under Section 409A or 4999 of the Code, or otherwise. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries remain subject to any compensation-related limitations or restrictions imposed by or related to Section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended.

(o)(n) There are no pending or, to the Company’s knowledge of the Company, threatened material labor grievances or material unfair labor practice claims or charges against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or any strikes or other material labor disputes against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries are party to or bound by any collective bargaining or similar agreement with any labor organization, or work rules or practices agreed to with any labor organization or employee association applicable to employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of the Company, there are no organizing efforts by any union or other group seeking to represent any employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and no employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries are represented by any labor organization.

(p)(o) To the knowledge of the Company, no current or former employee or independent contractor of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is in violation in any material respect of any term of any restrictive

covenant obligation, including anynon-compete,non-solicit,non-interference,non-disparagement or

confidentiality obligation (“Restrictive Covenant”) or any employment or consulting contract, common law nondisclosure obligation, fiduciary duty, or other obligation: (i) to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (ii) to a former employer or engager of any such individual relating (A) to the right of any such individual to work for the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (B) to the knowledge or use of trade secrets or proprietary information.

(q)(p) To the knowledge of the Company, no employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries with an annual compensation in excess of $100,000base salary equal to or greater than $75,000 intends to terminate his or her employment relationship.

3.12SEC Reports. The Company has previously made available to Parent an accurate and complete copy of each communication mailed by the Company to its shareholders since December 31, 2013. No such communication or any final registration statement, prospectus, report, schedule and definitive proxy statement filed with or furnished to the SEC since December 31, 2013 by the Company pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act (the “Company Reports”), as of the date thereof (and, in the case of registration statements and proxy statements, on the dates of effectiveness and the dates of the relevant meetings, respectively), contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading, except that information publicly filed or furnished as of a later date (but before the date of this Agreement) shall be deemed to modify information as of an earlier date. Since December 31, 2013, as of their respective dates, all the Company Reports filed under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act complied in all material respects with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto. None of the Company Subsidiaries is required to file periodic reports with the SEC pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. No executive officer of the Company has failed in any respect to make the certifications required of him or her under Section 302 or 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. There are no outstanding comments from or unresolved issues raised by the SEC with respect to any of the Company Reports.

3.13   Compliance with Applicable Law.

(a) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries hold, and have at all times since December 31, 2013,January 1, 2016 held, all licenses, franchises, permits and authorizations necessary for the lawful conduct of their respective businesses and ownership of their respective properties, rights and assets under and pursuant to each (and have paid in full all fees and assessments due and payable in connection therewith), except where neither the cost of failure to hold nor the cost of obtaining and holding any such license, franchise, permit or authorization (nor the failure to pay any such fees or assessments) would, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, and to the knowledge of the Company no suspension or cancellation of any such necessary license, franchise, permit or authorization is threatened. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with, and are not in material default or violation under, any applicable federal, state, local or foreign law, statute, order, decree, rule, regulation, policy, permit, authorization or authorizationcommon law or agency requirement (“Laws”) of any Governmental Entity relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, including without limitation all Laws related to data protection or privacy, the USA PatriotPATRIOT Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, the Fair Housing Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, any regulations promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Interagency Policy Statement on Retail Sales of Nondeposit Investment Products, the SAFE Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Regulation X, and any other Law relating to bank secrecy, discriminatory lending, financing or leasing practices, money laundering prevention, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act and all agency requirements relating to the origination, sale and servicing of mortgage and consumer loans. The Company Bank has a Community Reinvestment Act rating of “satisfactory” or better. Without limitation, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or to the knowledge of the Company, any director, officer, employee, agent, representative or other person acting on behalf of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has, directly or indirectly, (a)(i) used any funds of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for unlawful contributions, unlawful gifts, unlawful entertainment or other expenses relating to political activity, (b)(ii) made any

unlawful payment to foreign or domestic governmental officials or employees or to foreign or domestic political parties or campaigns from funds of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (c)(iii) violated any provision that would result in the violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any similar Law, (d)(iv) established or maintained any unlawful fund of monies or other assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (e)(v) made any fraudulent entry on the books or records of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (f)(vi) made any unlawful bribe, unlawful rebate, unlawful payoff, unlawful influence payment, unlawful kickback or other unlawful payment to any person, private or public, regardless of form, whether in money, property or services, to obtain favorable treatment in securing business to obtain special concessions for the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, to pay for favorable treatment for business secured or to pay for special concessions already obtained for the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or is currently subject to any United States sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Treasury Department.

3.14   

3.13Certain Contracts.

(a) Except as set forth inSection 3.14(a) 3.13(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule and excluding any Company Benefit Plan, as of the date hereof, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding (whether written or oral):

(i) with respect to the employment or service of any directors, officers, employees, independent contractorscontractor or consultants, consultant involving the payment by the Company of fees to such independent contractor or consultant of fees in excess of $50,000 annually;

(ii) which,that, upon the execution or delivery of this Agreement, shareholderstockholder adoption of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will (either alone or upon the occurrence of any additional acts or events) result in any payment (whether of severance pay or otherwise) becoming due from Parent, the Company, the Surviving Corporation,Bank, or any of their respective Subsidiaries to any director, officer, employee or employee thereof, consultant thereof;

(iii) whichthat is a “material contract” (as such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of RegulationS-K under the Securities Act), ;

(iv) whichthat contains anon-compete or client or customernon-solicit requirement or any other provision that materially restricts the conduct of any line of business by the Company or any of its affiliates or upon consummation of the Integrated MergersMerger will materially restrict the ability of the Surviving CorporationParent or any of its affiliates to engage in any line of business;

(v) that obligates the Company or its Subsidiaries (or, following the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, Parent or its Subsidiaries) to conduct business (v)with any third party on an exclusive or preferential basis, or that grants any person other than the Company or any of its Subsidiaries “most favored nation” status or similar rights;

(vi) to which any affiliate, officer, director or employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or beneficiary (except with respect to loans to, or deposits from, directors, officers and employees entered into in the ordinary course of business, on commercially reasonable terms and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements);

(vii) in respect of any (x) owned real property or (y) leased premises with respect to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is either a landlord or tenant (or subtenant);

(viii) that is a material Intellectual Property license or under which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has licensed to others the right to use any Intellectual Property owned by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, other than licenses for commercial“off-the-shelf” or “shrink-wrap” software that have not been modified or customized for the Company or its Subsidiaries other than through customization tools made available by the applicable licensor;

(ix) with or to a labor union or guild (including any collective bargaining agreement), (vi);

(x) any of the benefits of which contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding (including any stock option plan, stock appreciation rights plan, restricted stock plan or stock purchase plan) will be increased, or the vesting of the benefits of which will be accelerated, by the occurrence of the execution and delivery of this Agreement, shareholderstockholder adoption of this Agreement or the consummation of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or the value of any of the benefits of which will be calculated on the basis of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (vii)Agreement;

(xi) that relates to the incurrence of indebtedness by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (other than deposit liabilities, trade payables, federal funds purchased, advances and loans from the FHLB and Atlantic Community Bankers Bank and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, in each case incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice) in the principal amount of $500,000$250,000 or more including any sale and leaseback transactions, capitalized leases and other similar financing transactions, (viii)transactions;

(xii) that grants any right of first refusal, right of first offer or similar right with respect to any material assets, rights or properties of the Company or its Subsidiaries, (ix)Subsidiaries;

(xiii) that provides any rights to stockholders of the Company, including registration, preemptive or anti-dilution rights or rights to designate members of or observers to the Company’s or any of its Subsidiaries’ Board of Directors;

(xiv) that is a consulting agreement or data processing, software programming or licensing contract involving the payment of more than $100,000$80,000 per annum (other than any such contracts, arrangements, commitments or understandings, which are terminable by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries on sixty (60) days or less notice without any required payment or other conditions, other than the condition of notice),;

(xv) that includes an indemnification obligation of the Company or (x) whichany of its Subsidiaries with a maximum potential liability in excess of $80,000;

(xvi) with respect to any partnership or joint venture;

(xvii) that limits the payment of dividends by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries;

(xviii) entered into within the last three (3) years relating to the acquisition or disposition of any branch or business (whether by merger, sale of stock, sale of assets or otherwise) or any material amount of assets;

(xix) that (A) involves the payment by the Company or any Company Subsidiary of fees in excess of $15,000 annually and requires a consent to or otherwise contains a provision relating to a “change of control,” or (B) that would or would reasonably be expected to prevent, materially delay or impair the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; or

(xx) that involves aggregate payments or receipts by or to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in excess of $100,000$50,000 in any twelve-month period, other than those terminable on sixty (60) days or less notice without payment by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company of any material penalty.

Each contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding of the type described in thisSection 3.14(a) 3.13(a), whether or not set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule, is referred to herein as a “Company Contract,” and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries knows of, or has received notice of, any material violation of the aboveany Company Contract by any of the other parties thereto.

(b) The Company has made available to Parent a true, correct and complete copy of each written Company Contract and each written amendment to any Company Contract.Section 3.13(b) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true, correct and complete description of any oral Company Contract and any oral amendment to any Company Contract.

(c) Each Company Contract is valid and binding on the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, as applicable, and is in full force and effect, except as, either individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries has in all

material respects performed all obligations required to be performed by it under each Company Contract. To the Company’s knowledge of the Company, each third-party counterparty to each Company Contract has in all material respects performed all obligations required to be performed by it under such Company Contract, and no event or condition exists which constitutes or, after notice or lapse of time or both, will constitute, a material default on the part of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries under any such Company Contract.

3.15   3.14Agreements with Regulatory Agencies. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to anycease-and-desist or other order or enforcement action issued by, or is a party to any written agreement, consent agreement or memorandum of understanding with, or is a party to any commitment letter or similar

undertaking to, or is subject to any order or directive by, or has been ordered to pay any civil money penalty by, or has been, since January 1, 2013,2016, a recipient of any supervisory letter from, or, since January 1, 2013,2016, has adopted any policies, procedures or board resolutions at the request or suggestion of any Regulatory Agency or other Governmental Entity that currently restricts in any material respect the conduct of its business or that in any material manner relates to its capital adequacy, its ability to pay dividends, its credit or risk management policies, its management or its business (each, whether or not set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule, a “Company Regulatory Agreement”), nor has the Company or any of its Subsidiaries been advised, since January 1, 2013,2016, by any Regulatory Agency or other Governmental Entity that it is considering issuing, initiating, ordering or requesting any such Company Regulatory Agreement. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries are in compliance in all material respects with each Regulatory Agreement, if any, to which it is a party or is subject. The Company and its Subsidiaries have not received any notice from any Governmental Entity indicating that the Company or its Subsidiaries is not in compliance in any material respect with any Regulatory Agreement to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or is subject.

3.16   3.15Risk Management Instruments. All interest rate swaps, caps, floors, option agreements, futures and forward contracts and other similar derivative transactions and risk management arrangements (each, a “Derivative Contract”), whether entered into for the account of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or for the account of a customer of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, were entered into in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with applicable rules, regulations and policies of any Regulatory Agency and with counterparties believed to be financially responsible at the time and are legal, valid and binding obligations of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries enforceable in accordance with their terms (except as may be limited by the Enforceability Exceptions), and are in full force and effect. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries have duly performed in all material respects all of their material obligations under each Derivative Contract to the extent that such obligations to perform have accrued, and, to the Company’s knowledge of the Company, there are no material breaches, violations or defaults or allegations or assertions of such by any party thereunder. Each such Derivative Contract has been reflected in the books and records of the Company and such Subsidiaries in accordance with GAAP consistently applied. Each Derivative Contract is evidenced by customary and appropriate documentation (including an ISDA master agreement and long-form confirmation).

3.17   3.16Environmental Matters. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, the Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance, and have complied, with all Laws relating to: (a) the protection or restoration of the environment, health and safety as it relates to hazardous substance exposure or natural resource damages, (b) the handling, use, presence, disposal, release or threatened release of, or exposure to, any hazardous substance or (c) noise, odor, wetlands, indoor air, pollution, contamination or any injury to persons or property from exposure to any hazardous substance (collectively, “Environmental Laws”). There are no legal, administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims or actions, or to the knowledge of the Company any private environmental investigations or remediation activities or governmental investigations of any nature seeking to impose, or that could reasonably be expected to result in the imposition, on the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of any liability or obligation arising under any Environmental Law, pending or threatened against the Company, which liability or obligation would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. To the knowledge of the Company, there is no reasonable basis for any such proceeding, claim, action or governmental investigation that would impose any liability or obligation that would reasonably be expected to have, either

individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. The Company is not subject to any agreement, order, judgment, decree, letter agreement or memorandum of understanding by or with any court, governmental authority, regulatory agencyGovernmental Entity or third party imposing any liability or obligation with respect to the foregoing that would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.

3.18   3.17Investment Securities and Commodities.

(a) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has good and valid title to all securities and commodities owned by it (except those sold under repurchase agreements), free and clear of any Lien, except to the extent such securities or commodities are pledged in the ordinary course of business to secure obligations of the Company or its Subsidiaries. Such securities and commodities are valuedcarried on the books of the Company at values determined in accordance with GAAP.

(b) The Company and its Subsidiaries and their respective businesses employ investment, securities, commodities, risk management and other policies, practices and procedures that the Company reasonably believes in good faith are prudent and reasonable in the context of such businesses. Prior to the date of this Agreement, the Company has made available to Parent the terms of such policies, practices and procedures.

3.18Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for possible loan, lease, securities or credit losses (the “Allowance”) reflected in the Financial Statements and the Interim Financial Statements were, and the Allowance shown on the balance sheets of the Company as of dates subsequent to the execution of this Agreement will be, as of the dates thereof, adequate under GAAP and applicable regulatory requirements or guidelines.

3.19Real Property.

(a)Section 3.19(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth, as of the date hereof, a true, correct and complete list of all of the real property owned by the Company and its Subsidiaries (collectively, the “Owned Real Property”). The Company and each Company Subsidiary has good and marketable title to all the real property reflected in the latest audited balance sheet included in the Company Reports as being owned by the Company or any such Company Subsidiary or acquired after the date thereofOwned Real Property (except properties sold or otherwise disposed of sincein accordance withSections 5.1 and5.2)

(b)Section 3.19(b) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth, as of the date hereof, all of the real estate leases, subleases, licenses and occupancy agreements (together with any amendments, modifications, supplements, replacements, restatements and guarantees thereof or thereto) to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party with respect to all real property leased, subleased, licensed or otherwise used or occupied by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries on the date hereof (collectively, the “Leased Real Property”), whether in the ordinary courseCompany’s or any of business)its Subsidiaries’ capacity as lessee, sublessee, licensee, lessor, sublessor, or licensor, as the case may be (the “Company Owned PropertiesReal Estate Leases”),. The Company or its Subsidiaries has valid leasehold interests in the Leased Real Property, free and clear of all material Liens, except statutory Liens securing payments not yet due, Liens for real property Taxes not yet due and payable, easements, rights of way, and other similar encumbrances that do not materially affect the value or use of the properties or assets subject thereto or affected thereby or otherwise materially impair business operations at such properties and such imperfections or irregularities of title or Liens as do not materially affect the value or use of the properties or assets subject thereto or affected thereby or otherwise materially impair business operations at such properties (collectively, “Permitted Encumbrances”), and is the lessee of all leasehold estates reflected in the latest audited financial statements included in such Company Reports or acquired after the date thereof (except for leases that have expired by their terms since the date thereof) (the “Company Leased Properties” and, collectively with the Company Owned Properties, the “Company. Each Real Property”), free and clear of all Liens of any nature whatsoever, except for Permitted Encumbrances, and is in possession of the properties purported to be leased thereunder, and each such leaseEstate Lease is valid, binding and in full force and effect without material default thereunder by the lessee or, to the Company’s knowledge of the Company, the lessor.

(c) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has leased, subleased, licensed or otherwise granted any person a right to use or occupy all or any portion of any Owned Real Property or Leased Real Property. There are no pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened condemnation proceedings against the CompanyOwned Real Property or Leased Real Property.

3.20Intellectual PropertyProperty; Company Systems.

(a) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries owns, or is licensed to use (in each case, free and clear of any material Liens), all Intellectual Property necessary for the conduct of its business as currently conducted. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company: (a) (i) (A) the use of any Intellectual Property by the Company and its Subsidiaries does not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the rights of any person and is in accordance with any applicable license pursuant to which the Company or any Company Subsidiary acquired the right to use any Intellectual Property, and (ii)(B) no person has asserted to the Company that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated the Intellectual Property rights of such person, (b)(ii) no person is challenging, infringing on or otherwise violating any right of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries with respect to any Intellectual Property owned by and/or licensed to the Company or its Subsidiaries, and (c)(iii) neither the Company nor any Company

Subsidiary has received any notice of any pending claim with respect to any Intellectual Property owned by the Company or any Company Subsidiary, and the Company and its Subsidiaries have taken commercially reasonable actions to avoid the abandonment, cancellation or unenforceability of all Intellectual Property owned or licensed, respectively, by the Company and its Subsidiaries. For purposes of this Agreement, “Intellectual Property” means trademarks, service marks, brand names, internet domain names,

logos, symbols, certification marks, trade dress and other indications of origin, the goodwill associated with the foregoing and registrations in any jurisdiction of, and applications in any jurisdiction to register, the foregoing, including any extension, modification or renewal of any such registration or application; inventions, discoveries and ideas, whether patentable or not, in any jurisdiction; patents, applications for patents (including divisions, continuations, continuations in part and renewal applications), all improvements thereto, and any renewals, extensions or reissues thereof, in any jurisdiction; nonpublic information, trade secrets andknow-how, including processes, technologies, protocols, formulae, prototypes and confidential information and rights in any jurisdiction to limit the use or disclosure thereof by any person; writings and other works, whether copyrightable or not and whether in published or unpublished works, in any jurisdiction; and registrations or applications for registration of copyrights in any jurisdiction, and any renewals or extensions thereof; and any similar intellectual property or proprietary rights.

(b) The computer, information technology and data processing systems, facilities and services used by the Company or any Company Subsidiary, including all software, hardware, networks, communications facilities, platforms and related systems and services (collectively, the “Company Systems”), are reasonably sufficient for the conduct of the respective businesses of the Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries as currently conducted and the Company Systems are in sufficiently good working condition to effectively perform all computing, information technology and data processing operations reasonably necessary for the operation of the respective businesses of the Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries as currently conducted, in each case, except for such failures to be reasonably sufficient or in sufficiently good working condition that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, to the knowledge of the Company, since January 1, 2015, no third party has gained unauthorized access to any Company Systems owned or controlled by the Company or any of the Company’s Subsidiaries. The Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries have taken commercially reasonable steps and implemented commercially reasonable safeguards (i) to protect the Company Systems from unauthorized access and from disabling codes or instructions, spyware, Trojan horses, worms, viruses or other software routines that permit or cause unauthorized access to, or disruption, impairment, disablement, or destruction of, software, data or other materials and (ii) that are designed for the purpose of reasonably mitigating the risks of cybersecurity breaches and attacks. Each of the Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries has in all material respects implemented reasonably appropriate backup and disaster recovery policies, procedures and systems consistent with generally accepted industry standards and sufficient to reasonably mitigate the risk of a material disruption to the operation of the respective businesses of the Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries.

(c) Each of the Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries has (i) complied in all material respects with all of its published privacy and data security policies and internal privacy and data security policies and guidelines, including with respect to the collection, storage, transmission, transfer, disclosure, destruction and use of personally identifiable information and (ii) taken commercially reasonable measures to ensure that all personally identifiable information in its possession or control is protected against loss, damage, and unauthorized access, use, modification, or other misuse. To the knowledge of the Company, since January 1, 2015, there has been no material loss, damage, or unauthorized access, use, modification, or other misuse of any such information by the Company or any of the Company’s Subsidiaries.

3.21Related Party Transactions. Except as set forth inSection 3.21 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, there are no transactions or series of related transactions, agreements, arrangements or understandings, nor are there any currently proposed transactions or series of related transactions, agreements, arrangements or understandings between (a) the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and (b) (i) any current or

former director, president, vice president in charge of a principal business unit, division or “executive officer” (as definedfunction (such as sales, administration or finance), other officer who performs a policy-making function or other person who performs a similar policy-making function, inRule 3b-7 under the Exchange Act) each case of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (ii) any person who beneficially owns (as defined in Rules13d-3 and13d-5 of the Exchange Act) 5% or more of the outstanding Company Common Stock (or any of such person’s immediate family members or affiliates), on the other hand, except those of a type available to employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries generally.

3.22State Takeover ProtectionsLaws.

(a) No “moratorium,” “fair price,” “business combination,” “control share acquisition,” “interested stockholder”,stockholder,” “affiliate transactions”, or similar provision of any state anti-takeover, including the New Jersey Shareholders’ Protection Act (any such laws, “Takeover Statutes”) is applicable to this Agreement, the Integrated MergersMerger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement under any Law.

3.23Reorganization. Neither the BCA or federal law.

(b)     Article VICompany nor any of its Subsidiaries has taken any action, nor, to the knowledge of the Company, Certificate is not applicableare there any facts or circumstances, that could reasonably be expected to this Agreement,prevent the Integrated Mergers or anyMerger from being treated as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and neither Parent nor Merger Sub will be deemed to be an “Interested Stockholder” (as defined in the Company Certificate) as result of Parent entering into the Voting Agreements or otherwise. The Board of Directors of the Company has taken or caused to be taken all action necessary to ensure that neither Parent nor Merger Sub will be prohibited from engaging in a “Business Combination” (as defined in the Company Certificate) with the Company or any of its affiliates under the provisions of the Company Certificate.Code.

3.23   3.24Opinion. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company has received an opinion (which, if initially rendered verbally, has been or will be confirmed by a written opinion, dated the same date) of Sandler O’NeillBoenning & Partners, L.P.Scattergood Inc. to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, and based upon and subject to the factors, assumptions and limitations set forth therein, the Merger Consideration pursuant to this AgreementExchange Ratio is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of Company Common Stock. Such opinion has not been amended or rescinded as of the date of this Agreement.

3.24   3.25Company Information. The information relating to the Company and its Subsidiaries which(and its and their directors and officers) to be contained in the Proxy Statement and theS-4 and the information relating to the Company and its Subsidiaries that is provided by the Company or its representatives for inclusion in the Joint Proxy Statement and the S-4, or in any other document filed with any other Regulatory Agency in connection herewith, will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they are made, not misleading. The Joint Proxy Statement (except for such portions thereof that relate only to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries) will comply in all material respects with the provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

3.25   3.26Loan Portfolio.

(a) As of the date hereof, except as set forth inSection 3.25(a) 3.26(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any written or oral (i) loan, loan agreement, note or borrowing arrangement (including leases, credit enhancements, commitments, guarantees and interest-bearing assets) (collectively, “Loans”) in which the Company or any Subsidiary of the Companyits Subsidiaries is a creditor whichand that, as of March 31, 2016,September 30, 2018, had an outstanding balance of $100,000 or more and under the terms of which the obligor was, as of March 31, 2016,September 30, 2018, over 90 days or more delinquent in payment of principal or interest, or (ii) Loans with any director, executive officer or 5% or greater shareholder of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or to the knowledge of the Company, any affiliate of any of the foregoing.interest. Set forth inSection 3.25(a) 3.26(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule is a true, correct and complete list of (A)(i) all of the Loans of the Company and its Subsidiaries that, as of March 31, 2016,September 30, 2018, were classified by the Company as “Other Loans Specially Mentioned,” “Special Mention,” “Substandard,” “Doubtful,” “Loss,” “Classified,” “Criticized,” “Credit Risk Assets,” “Concerned Loans,” “Watch List” or words of similar import, together with the principal amount of and accrued and unpaid interest on each such Loan and the identity of the borrower thereunder, together with the aggregate principal amount of and accrued and unpaid interest on such Loans, by category of Loan (e.g., commercial, consumer, etc.), together with the aggregate principal amount of such Loans by category and (B)(ii) each asset of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that, as of March 31, 2016,September 30, 2018, is classified as “Other Real Estate Owned” and the book value thereof.

(b)     Set forth inSection 3.25(b) of the Company Disclosure Schedule is a true, correct and complete list, as of March 31, 2016, of each Loan of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that is structured as a participation interest in a Loan originated by another person (each, a “Loan Participation”), including with respect to each such Loan Participation, the originating lender of the related Loan, the outstanding principal balance of the related Loan, the amount of the outstanding principal balance represented by the Loan Participation and the identity of the borrower of the related Loan.

(c) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, each Loan of the Company and its Subsidiaries (i) is evidenced by notes, agreements or other evidences of indebtedness that are true, genuine and what they purport to be, (ii) to the extent carried on the books and records of the Company and its Subsidiaries as secured Loans, has been secured by valid charges,

mortgages, pledges, security interests, restrictions, claims, liens or encumbrances, as applicable, which have been perfected and (iii) is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the obligor named therein, enforceable in accordance with its terms, subject to the Enforceability Exceptions.

(d)(c) Each outstanding Loan of the Company and its Subsidiaries (including Loans held for resale to investors) was solicited and originated, and is and has been administered and, where applicable, serviced, and the relevant Loan files are being maintained, in all material respects in accordance with the relevant notes orand other credit orand security documents, the written underwriting standards of the Company and its Subsidiaries (and, in the case of Loans held for resale to investors, the underwriting standards, if any, of the applicable investors) and with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and rules.Laws.

(e)(d) None of the agreements pursuant to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has sold Loans or pools of Loans or participations in Loans or pools of Loans contains any obligation to repurchase such Loans or interests therein solely on account of a payment default by the obligor on any such Loan.

(f)(e) There are no outstanding Loans made by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any “executive officer” or other “insider” (as each such term is defined in Regulation O promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board) of the Company or its Subsidiaries, other than Loans that are subject to and that were made and continue to be in compliance with Regulation O or that are exempt therefrom.

(g)(f) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is now nor has it ever been since December 31, 2013,January 1, 2016, subject to any fine, suspension, settlement or other contract or other administrative

agreement or sanction by, or any reduction in any loan purchase commitment from, any Governmental Entity or Regulatory Agency relating to the origination, sale or servicing of mortgage or consumer Loans.

3.26   3.27Insurance. The Company and its Subsidiaries are insured with reputable insurers against such risks and in such amounts as thethat management of the Company reasonably has determined to be prudent, sufficient and consistent with industry practice, and the Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance in all material respects with their insurance policies, each of which is listed inSection 3.26 3.27 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, and are not in default under any of the termsterm thereof, each such policy is outstanding and in full force and effect and, except for policies insuring against potential liabilities of officers, directors and employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries, the Company or the relevant Subsidiary thereof is the sole beneficiary of such policies, and all premiums and other payments due under any such policy have been paid, and all claims thereunder have been filed in due and timely fashion.

3.27   3.28No Other Representations or Warranties.

(a) Except for the representations and warranties made by the Company in thisArticle III, neither the Company nor any other person makes any express or implied representation or warranty with respect to the Company, its Subsidiaries, or their respective businesses, operations, assets, liabilities, conditions (financial or otherwise) or prospects, and the Company hereby disclaims any such other representations or warranties. In particular, without limiting the foregoing disclaimer, neither the Company nor any other person makes or has made any representation or warranty to Parent or any of its affiliates or representatives with respect to (i) any financial projection, forecast, estimate, budget or prospective information relating to the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or their respective businesses or (ii) except for the representations and warranties made by the Company in thisArticle III, any oral or written information presented to Parent or any of its affiliates or representatives in the course of their due diligence investigation of the Company, the negotiation of this Agreement or in the course of the transactions contemplated hereby.

(b) The Company acknowledges and agrees that neither Parent nor any other person has made or is making any express or implied representation or warranty with respect to Parent, its Subsidiaries or their respective businesses, operations, assets, liabilities, conditions (financial or otherwise) or prospects, other than those contained inArticle IV.

ARTICLE IV

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT

Except (i)(a) as disclosed in the disclosure schedule delivered by Parent to the Company concurrently herewith (the “Parent Disclosure Schedule”);provided, that (a)(i) no such item is required to be set forth as an exception to a representation or warranty if its absence would not result in the related representation or warranty being deemed untrue or incorrect, (b)(ii) the mere inclusion of an item in the Parent Disclosure Schedule as an exception to a representation or warranty shall not be deemed an admission by Parent that such item represents a material exception or fact, event or circumstance or that such item is reasonably likely to result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent and (c)(iii) any disclosures made with respect to a section ofArticle IV shall be deemed to qualify (1) any other section ofArticle IV (A) specifically referenced or cross-referenced and (2) other sections of Article IV(B) to the extent it is reasonably apparent on its face (notwithstanding the absence of a specific cross-reference) from a reading of the disclosure that such disclosure applies to such other sections or (ii)(b) as disclosed in any Parent Reports publicly filed by Parent sinceafter December 31, 2014,2017 and prior to the date hereof (but disregarding risk factor disclosures contained under the heading “Risk Factors,” or disclosures of risks set forth in any “forward-looking statements” disclaimer or any other statements that are similarlynon-specific or cautionary, predictive or forward-looking in nature), Parent hereby represents and warrants to the Company as follows:

4.1Corporate Organization.

(a) Parent is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware and is a savings and loanbank holding company duly registered with the Federal Reserve

Board under the HOLA.Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”). Parent has the corporate power and authority to own or lease all of its properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. Parent is duly licensed or qualified to do business in each jurisdiction in which the nature of the business conducted by it or the character or location of the properties and assets owned or leased by it makes such licensing or qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so licensed or qualified would not, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. True, correct and complete copies of the Merger SubParent Certificate, the Merger SubParent Bylaws, the Parent Certificate of Incorporation of the Bank and the Parent Bylaws of the Bank, as in effect as of the date of this Agreement, have previously been made available by Parent to the Company.Exhibit F sets forth a true, correct and complete list of each branch of the Bank as of the date hereof and the related address.

(b) ParentThe Bank is a federal savingsnational bank duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the United States.States and is a wholly owned Subsidiary of Parent. The deposits of Parentthe Bank are insured by the FDIC through the Deposit Insurance Fund to the fullest extent permitted by law,Law, all premiums and assessments required to be paid in connection therewith have been paid when due and no proceedings for the termination of such insurance are pending or threatened. Without duplication of each of the foregoing sentences of thisSection 4.1(b) and the representations and warranties set forth inSection 4.1(c), each Subsidiary of Parent (a “Parent Subsidiary”) (i) is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of its jurisdiction of organization, (ii) is duly qualified to do business and, where such concept is recognized under applicable law,Law, is in good standing in all jurisdictions (whether federal, state, local or foreign) where its ownership or leasing of property or the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified, and in whichexcept where the failure to be so qualified or in good standing would not, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent and (iii) has all requisite company, partnership or corporate (as applicable) power and authority to own or lease its properties and assets and to carry on its business as now conducted. There are no restrictions on the ability of any Subsidiary of Parent to pay dividends or distributions except, in the case of a Subsidiary that is a regulated entity, for restrictions on dividends or distributions generally applicable to all such regulated entities.Section 4.1(b) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true and complete list of all Subsidiaries of Parent as of the date hereof.

(c)     Merger Sub is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of New Jersey and is a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent. Merger Sub has the corporate power and authority to own or lease all of its properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted, and is duly licensed or qualified to do business in each jurisdiction in which the nature of the business conducted by it or the character or location of the properties and assets owned or leased by it makes such licensing or qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so licensed or qualified would not, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. True and complete copies of the Merger Sub Certificate and Merger Sub Bylaws, as in effect as of the date of this Agreement, have previously been made available by Parent to the Company.

4.2Capitalization.

(a) The authorized capital stock of Parent consists of 55,000,000150,000,000 shares of Parent Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value, of which no shares of preferred stock are issued or outstanding. As of the date of this Agreement, there are (i) 25,748,89848,382,370 shares of Parent Common Stock issued and outstanding, which number includes 157,579(ii) no shares of Parent Common Stock grantedheld in treasury, (iii) 3,473,598 shares of Parent Common Stock reserved for issuance in respect of outstanding awards of restricted Parent Common Stock (“Parent Restricted Stock Awards”) granted under Parent’s 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, (ii) 7,817,874 shares of Parent Common Stock held in treasury, (iii) 2,902,017 shares of Parent Common Stock reserved for issuanceor upon the exercise of stock options granted under Parent’s 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, Parent’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, the Sun Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, the Sun Bancorp, Inc. 2010 Stock Based-Incentive Plan, the Sun Bancorp, Inc. 2004 Stock Based-Incentive Plan, the Cape Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Colonial Financial Services, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, the Ocean Shore Holding Co. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan or the Ocean Shore Holding Co. 2010 Incentive Plan, as applicable (such stock options, together with the Parent Restricted Stock Awards, the “Parent Equity Awards”), (iv) 27,339 shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of warrants assumed in connection with the acquisition of Colonial American Bank and (iv)(v) no other shares of capital stock or otherequity or voting securities of Parent issued, reserved for issuance or outstanding. All of the issued and outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable and free of any preemptive rights, with no personal liability attaching to the ownership thereof. There are no bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness that have the right to vote on any matters on

which shareholdersstockholders of Parent may vote. As of the date of this Agreement, no trust preferred or subordinated debt securities of Parent are issued or outstanding. Other than the Parent Equity Awards issued prior to the date of this Agreement, as of the date of this Agreement, there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, warrants, puts, calls, rights, exchangeable or convertible securities or other commitments or agreements obligating Parent to issue, transfer, sell, purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any such securities. There are no voting trusts, shareholderstockholder agreements, proxies or other agreements in effect with respect to the voting or transfer of the Parent Common Stock or other equity interests of Parent.

(b) Parent owns, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock or other equity ownership interests of each of the Parent Subsidiaries, free and clear of any Liens, and all of such shares or equity ownership interests are duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable (except, with respect to bank Subsidiaries, as provided under 12 U.S.C. § 55 or any comparable provision of applicable federal or state law) and free of preemptive rights, with no personal liability attaching to the ownership thereof. No Parent Subsidiary has or is bound by any outstanding subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, rights, commitments or agreements of any character calling for the purchase or issuance of any shares of capital stock or any other equity security of such Subsidiary or any securities representing the right to purchase or otherwise receive any shares of capital stock or any other equity security of such Subsidiary.

4.3Authority; No Violation.

(a) Each of Parent and Merger Subthe Bank has full corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the Integrated Mergers and the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock in connection with the First-Step Merger, (such issuance, the “Parent Share Issuance”), have been duly and validly approved by the Board of Directors of Parent, and the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the First-Step Merger have been duly and validly approved by the Board of Directors of Merger Sub. The Board of Directors ofthe Bank and by Parent, has directed thatas the Parent Share Issuance be submitted to Parent’s shareholders for approval at a meeting of such shareholders and has adopted a resolution to the foregoing effect. Except for the affirmative vote of a majoritysole stockholder of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of Parent Common Stock at the Parent Meeting to approve the Parent Share Issuance (the “Requisite Parent Vote”), noBank. No other corporate proceedings or approvals on the part of Parent or the Bank are necessary to approve this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by Parent and Merger Sub andthe Bank (assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the Company) constitutes a valid and binding obligation of Parent and Merger Sub,the Bank, enforceable against Parent and Merger Subthe Bank in accordance with its terms (except in all cases as such enforceability may be limited by the Enforceability Exceptions). The shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in the First-Step Merger have been validly authorized (subject to the attainment of the Requisite Parent Vote), and, when issued in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, and no current or past shareholderstockholder of Parent will have any preemptive right or similar rights in respect thereof.

(b) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent or Merger Sub,the Bank, nor the consummation by Parent or Merger Subthe Bank of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor compliance by Parent or Merger Subthe Bank with anyeach of the terms orand provisions hereof will (i) violate any provision of the Parent Certificate, the Parent Bylaws, the Merger Sub Certificate of Incorporation of the Bank or the Merger Sub Bylaws of the Bank or (ii) assuming that the consents and approvals referred to inSection 4.4 are duly obtained, (x) violate any statute, code, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, order, writ, decree or injunction applicable to Parent, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets or (y) violate, conflict with, result in a breach of any provision of or the loss of any benefit under, constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a default) under, result in the termination of or a right of termination or cancellation under, accelerate the performance required by, or result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the respective properties or assets of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any contract, note, bond, mortgage, indenture, deed of trust, license, lease, agreement or other instrument or obligation to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is a

party, or by which they or any of their respective properties or assets may be bound, except (in the case ofclause(y) above) for such violations, conflicts, breaches or defaults which, either individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.

(c)     The Board of Directors of Parent Bank has adopted the Bank Merger Agreement. Parent, as the sole shareholder of Parent Bank, has approved the Bank Merger Agreement, and the Bank Merger Agreement has been duly executed by Parent Bank.

4.4Consents and Approvals. Except for (a) the filing of applications, filings, certificates and notices, as applicable, with the NASDAQ and the approval of the listing on the NASDAQ of the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued as the Merger Consideration pursuant to this Agreement, (b) the filing of applications, filings, certificates and notices, as applicable, with the Federal Reserve Board under the HOLABHC Act and approval of such applications, filings and notices, (c) the filing of applications, filings, certificates and notices, as applicable, with the OCC, including filing of the Notice of Consummation with the OCC pursuant to the National Bank Act, and approval of such applications, filings and notices, (d) the filing with the SEC of (i) any filings that are necessary under applicable requirements of the Exchange Act including the filing of the Joint Proxy Statement and (ii) theS-4 and declaration of effectiveness of theS-4, (e) the filing of the First-Step Merger Certificateapplications, filings, certificates and notices, as applicable, with the New Jersey Secretary pursuant to the BCA,NJ Department and (f) the filing of the Second-Step Merger Certificates with the Delaware Secretary and the New Jersey Secretary in accordance with the DGCL and the BCA, respectively, (g) the filing of the Bank Merger Certificate, and (h) such filings and approvals as are required to be made or obtained under the securities or “Blue Sky” laws of various states in connection with the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement, no consents or approvals of or filings or registrations with any Governmental Entity or any third party are necessary in connection with (A) the execution and delivery by Parent or the Bank of this Agreement or (B) the consummation by Parent or the Bank of the Integrated MergersMerger and the other transactions contemplated hereby (includinghereby. As of the date hereof, to the knowledge of Parent, neither Parent nor the Bank Merger).have any reason to believe that a Materially Burdensome Regulatory Condition will occur.

4.5Reports. Parent and each of its Subsidiaries have timely filed all reports, registrations and statements, together with any amendments required to be made with respect thereto, that they were required to file since January 1, 20132015 with any Regulatory Agencies, including without limitation, any report, registration or statement required to be filed pursuant to the laws, rules or regulations of the United States, any state, any foreign entity or any Regulatory Agency, and have paid in full all fees and assessments due and payable in connection therewith, except where the failure to file such report, registration or statement or to pay such fees and assessments, either individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. Except for normal examinations conducted by a Regulatory Agency in the ordinary course of business of Parent and its Subsidiaries, (i)(a) no Regulatory Agency has initiated or has pending any proceeding or, to the knowledge of Parent, investigation into the business or operations of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries since January 1, 2013,2015, except where such proceedings or investigation would not reasonably be expected to be, either individually or in the aggregate, material to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (ii)(b) there is no unresolved violation, criticism, or exception by any Regulatory Agency with respect to any report or statement relating to any examinations or inspections of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and (iii)(c) there hashave been no formal or informal inquiries by, or disagreements or disputes with, any Regulatory Agency with respect to the business, operations, policies or procedures of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries since January 1, 2013,2015, in each case, which would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. Parent and its Subsidiaries have fully resolved all “matters requiring attention,” “matters requiring immediate attention” or similar items as identified by any such Regulatory Agency, except for such failures to so resolve such matters or similar items that would not impede or materially delay the ability of Parent to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

4.6Financial Statements.

(a) The financial statements of Parent and its Subsidiaries included (or incorporated by reference) in the Parent Reports (including the related notes, where applicable) (i) have been prepared from, and are in accordance with, the books and records of Parent and its Subsidiaries, (ii) fairly present in all material respects the consolidated results of operations, cash flows, changes in shareholders’stockholders’ equity and consolidated financial position of Parent and its Subsidiaries for the respective fiscal periods or as of the respective dates

therein set forth (subject in the case of unaudited statements toyear-end audit adjustments normal in nature and amount), (iii) complied, as of their respective dates of filing with the SEC, in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements and with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto and (iv) have been prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently applied during the periods involved, except, in each case, as indicated in such statements or in the notes thereto. The books and records of Parent and its Subsidiaries have been, and are being, maintained in all material respects in accordance with GAAP and any other applicable legal and accounting requirements and reflect only actual transactions. KPMG LLP has not resigned (or informed Parent that it intends to resign) or been dismissed as independent public accountants of Parent as a result of or in connection with any disagreements with Parent on a matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure.

(b) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has any liability of any nature whatsoever (whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise and whether due or to become due), except for those liabilities that are reflected or reserved against on the consolidated balance sheet of Parent included in its Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2016June 30, 2018 (including any notes thereto) and for liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice since March 31, 2016,June 30, 2018, or in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.

(c) The records, systems, controls, data and information of Parent and its Subsidiaries are recorded, stored, maintained and operated under means (including any electronic, mechanical or photographic process, whether computerized or not) that are under the exclusive ownership and direct control of Parent or its Subsidiaries or their accountants (including all means of access thereto and therefrom), except for anynon-exclusive ownership andnon-direct control that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. Parent (x) has implemented and maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in RuleRule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to Parent, including its Subsidiaries, is made known to the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Parent by others within those entities as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and to make the certifications required by the Exchange Act and Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and (y) has disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to Parent’s outside auditors and the audit committee of Parent’s Board of Directors (i) any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Parent’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information, and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Parent’s internal controls over financial reporting. These disclosures were made in writing by management to Parent’s auditors and audit committee and a copy has previously been made available to the Company. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no reason to believe that Parent’s outside auditors and its chief executive officer and chief financial officer will not be able to give the certifications and attestations required pursuant to the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, without qualification, when next due.

(d) Since January 1, 2013,2016, (i) neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor, to the knowledge of Parent, any director, officer, auditor, accountant or representative of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, has received or otherwise had or obtained knowledge of any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim, whether written or oral, regarding the accounting or auditing practices, procedures, methodologies or methods (including with respect to loan loss reserves, write-downs, charge-offs and accruals) of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or their respective internal accounting controls, including any material complaint, allegation,

assertion or claim that Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has engaged in questionable accounting or auditing practices and (ii) no attorney representing Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a material violation of securities laws, breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation by Parent or any of its officers, directors, employees or agents to the Board of Directors of Parent or any committee thereof or, to the knowledge of Parent, to any director or officer of Parent.

4.7Broker’s Fees. With the exception of the engagement of Piper Jaffray & Co., neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary nor any of their respective officers or directors has employed any broker, finder or financial advisor or incurred any liability for any broker’s fees, commissions or finder’s fees in connection with the Integrated MergersMerger or relatedthe other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

4.8Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Since December 31, 2015,2017, no event or events have occurred that have had or would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.

4.9Legal Proceedings.

(a) Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any, and there are no pending or, to Parent’sthe knowledge of Parent, threatened, legal, administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims, actions or governmental or regulatory investigations (i) of any material nature against Parent or its Subsidiariesany Parent Subsidiary or any of its or their current or former directors or executive officers which would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent or (ii) challenging the validity or propriety of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(b) There is no injunction, order, judgment, decree or regulatory restriction imposed upon Parent, any of its Subsidiaries or the assets, rights or properties of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries (or that, upon consummation of the Integrated Mergers,Merger, would apply to Parent or any of its affiliates) that would reasonably be expected to be material to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.

4.10Taxes and Tax Returns.

(a)     Each of Parent and its Subsidiaries has duly and timely filed or caused to be filed (giving effect to all applicable extensions) all material Tax Returns required to be filed by any of them, and all such Tax Returns are true, correct, and complete in all material respects.

(b)     All material Taxes of Parent and its Subsidiaries that are due have been fully and timely paid or adequate reserves therefor have been made on the financial statements of Parent and its Subsidiaries included (or incorporated by reference) in the Parent Reports (including the related notes, where applicable). Each of Parent and its Subsidiaries has withheld and paid to the relevant Governmental Entity on a timely basis all material Taxes required to have been withheld and paid in connection with amounts paid or owing to any person.

(c)     No claim has been made in writing by any Governmental Entity in a jurisdiction where Parent or any of its Subsidiaries does not file Tax Returns that Parent or such subsidiary is or may be subject to taxation by that jurisdiction.

(d)     There are no material Liens for Taxes on any of the assets of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.

(e)     Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has received written notice of assessment or proposed assessment in connection with any material amount of Taxes, and there are no threatened in writing or pending disputes, claims, audits, examinations, investigations, or other proceedings regarding any material Tax of Parent and its Subsidiaries or the assets of Parent and its Subsidiaries which have not been paid, settled or withdrawn or for which adequate reserves have not been established.

(f)     Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has taken any action, or knows of any fact or circumstance, that could reasonably be expected to prevent the Integrated Mergers, taken together, from being treated as an integrated transaction that qualifies as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

4.11   Employees.

(a)     Each Parent Benefit Plan has been established, operated and administered in all material respects in accordance with its terms and the requirements of all applicable laws, including ERISA and the Code. For purposes of this Agreement, “Parent Benefit Plans” mean all employee benefit plans (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA, whether or not subject to ERISA, whether funded or unfunded, and all pension, benefit, retirement, bonus, stock option, stock purchase, restricted stock, stock-based, performance award, phantom equity, incentive, deferred compensation, retiree medical or life insurance, supplemental retirement, severance, retention, employment, consulting, termination, change in control, salary continuation, accrued leave, sick leave, vacation, paid time off, health, medical, disability, life, accidental death and dismemberment, insurance, welfare, fringe benefit and other similar plans, programs, policies, practices or arrangements or other contracts or agreements (and any amendments thereto) to or with respect to which Parent or any Subsidiary or any trade or business of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not incorporated, all of which together with Parent would be deemed a “single employer” within the meaning of Section 4001 of ERISA (a “Parent ERISA Affiliate”), is a party or has any current or future obligation or that are sponsored, maintained, contributed to or required to be contributed to by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent ERISA Affiliate for the benefit of any current or former employee, officer, director, consultant or independent contractor (or any spouse or dependent of such individual) of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent ERISA Affiliate.

(b)     With respect to each Parent Benefit Plan that is subject to Title IV or Section 302 of ERISA or Sections 412, 430 or 4971 of the Code: (i) no such plan is in “at-risk” status for purposes of Section 430 of the Code, (ii) the present value of accrued benefits under such Parent Benefit Plan, based upon the actuarial assumptions used for funding purposes in the most recent actuarial report prepared by such Parent Benefit Plan’s actuary with respect to such Parent Benefit Plan, did not, as of its latest valuation date, exceed the then current fair market value of the assets of such Parent Benefit Plan allocable to such accrued benefits, (iii) no reportable event within the meaning of Section 4043(c) of ERISA for which the 30-day notice requirement has not been waived has occurred, (iv) all premiums to the PBGC have been timely paid in full, (v) no liability (other than for premiums to the PBGC) under Title IV of ERISA has been or is expected to be incurred by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, and (vi) the PBGC has not instituted proceedings to terminate any such Parent Benefit Plan.

(c)     There are no pending or threatened claims (other than claims for benefits in the ordinary course), lawsuits or arbitrations that have been asserted or instituted, and, to Parent’s knowledge, no set of circumstances exists that may reasonably be expected to give rise to a claim or lawsuit, against the Parent Benefit Plans, any fiduciaries thereof with respect to their duties to the Parent Benefit Plans or the assets of any of the trusts under any of the Parent Benefit Plans that could reasonably be expected to result in any material liability of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to the PBGC, the IRS, the DOL, any Multiemployer Plan, a Multiple Employer Plan, any participant in any Parent Benefit Plan, or any other party.

(d)     There are no pending or, to Parent’s knowledge, threatened material labor grievances or material unfair labor practice claims or charges against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, or any strikes or other material labor disputes against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries. Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries are party to or bound by any collective bargaining or similar agreement with any labor organization, or work rules or practices agreed to with any labor organization or employee association applicable to employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of Parent, there are no organizing efforts by any union or other group seeking to represent any employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and no employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries are represented by any labor organization.

4.12   SEC Reports. Parent has previously made available to the Company an accuratea true, correct and complete copy of each communication mailed by Parent to its shareholdersstockholders since December 31, 2013.January 1, 2016. No such communication or any final registration statement, prospectus, report, schedule andor definitive proxy statement filed with or furnished to the SEC since December 31, 2013January 1, 2016 by Parent pursuant to the Securities Act or the Exchange Act (the “Parent Reports”) as of the date thereof (and, in the case of registration statements and proxy statements, on the dates of effectiveness and the dates of the relevant meetings, respectively), contained any

untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading, except that information publicly filed or furnished as of a later date (but before the date of this Agreement) shall be deemed to modify information as of an earlier date.misleading. Since December 31, 2013,January 1, 2016, as of their respective dates, all Parent Reports filed under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act complied in all material respects with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto. No executive officer of Parent has failed in any respect to make the certifications required of him or her under Section 302 or 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. There are no outstanding comments from or unresolved issues raised by the SEC with respect to any of the Parent Reports.

4.13   4.11Compliance with Applicable Law. Parent and each of its Subsidiaries hold, and have at all times since December 31, 2013,January 1, 2016 held, all licenses, franchises, permits and authorizations necessary for the lawful conduct of their respective businesses and ownership of their respective properties, rights and assets under and pursuant to each (and have paid in full all fees and assessments due and payable in connection therewith), except where neither the cost of failure to hold nor the cost of obtaining and holding any such license, franchise, permit or authorization (nor the failure to pay any such fees or assessments) would, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, and, to the knowledge of Parent, no suspension or cancellation of any such necessary license, franchise, permit or authorization is threatened. Parent and each of its Subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with, and are not in material default or violation under, any applicable

Laws, including without limitation all Laws related to data protection or privacy, the USA PATRIOT Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, the Fair Housing Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, any regulations promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Interagency Policy Statement on Retail Sales of Nondeposit Investment Products, the SAFE Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Regulation X, and any other Law relating to bank secrecy, discriminatory lending, financing or leasing practices, money laundering prevention, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act and all agency requirements relating to the origination, sale and servicing of mortgage and consumer loans. Each of the Subsidiaries of Parent that is an insured depository institution has a Community Reinvestment Act rating of “satisfactory” or better. Without limitation, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, or to the knowledge of Parent, any director, officer, employee, agent, representative or other person acting on behalf of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has, directly or indirectly, (a) used any funds of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries for unlawful contributions, unlawful gifts, unlawful entertainment or other expenses relating to political activity, (b) made any unlawful payment to foreign or domestic governmental officials or employees or to foreign or domestic political parties or campaigns from funds of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, (c) violated any provision that would result in the violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any similar Law, (d) established or maintained any unlawful fund of monies or other assets of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, (e) made any fraudulent entry on the books or records of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or (f) made any unlawful bribe, unlawful rebate, unlawful payoff, unlawful influence payment, unlawful kickback or other unlawful payment to any person, private or public, regardless of form, whether in money, property or services, to obtain favorable treatment in securing business to obtain special concessions for Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, to pay for favorable treatment for business secured or to pay for special concessions already obtained for Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, or is currently subject to any United States sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Treasury Department.

4.14   4.12Agreements with Regulatory Agencies. Except as set forth inonSection 4.14 4.12 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to anycease-and-desist or other order or enforcement action issued by, or is a party to any written agreement, consent agreement or memorandum of understanding with, or is a party to any commitment letter or similar undertaking to, or is subject to any order or directive by, or has been ordered to pay any civil money penalty by, or has been, since January 1, 2013,2016, a recipient of any supervisory letter from, or, since January 1, 2013,2016, has adopted any policies, procedures or board

resolutions at the request or suggestion of any Regulatory Agency or other Governmental Entity that currently restricts in any material respect the conduct of its business or that in any material manner relates to its capital adequacy, its ability to pay dividends, its credit or risk management policies, its management or its business (each, whether or not set forth in the Parent Disclosure Schedule, a “Parent Regulatory Agreement”), nor has Parent or any of its Subsidiaries been advised, since January 1, 2013,2016, by any Regulatory Agency or other Governmental Entity that it is considering issuing, initiating, ordering or requesting any such Parent Regulatory Agreement.

4.15   Certain Contracts.

(a)     Each contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding (whether written or oral) which is a “material contract” (as such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act) to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is bound as of the date hereof has been filed as an exhibit to the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Parent, or a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K subsequent thereto (each, a “Parent Contract”) and neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries knows of, or has received notice of, any material violation of the above by any of the other parties thereto.

(b)     Each Parent Contract is valid and binding on Parent or one of its Subsidiaries, as applicable, and in full force and effect, except as, either individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. Parent and each of its Subsidiaries has in all material respects performed all obligations required to be performed by it under each Parent Contract. To Parent’s knowledge, each third-party counterparty to each Parent Contract has in all material respects performed all obligations required to be performed by it under such Parent Contract, and no event or condition exists which constitutes or, after notice or lapse of time or both, will constitute, a material default on the part of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries under any such Parent Contract.

4.16   Environmental Matters. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, Parent and its Subsidiaries are in compliance, and have complied, with all Environmental Laws. There are no legal, administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims or actions, or to the knowledge of Parent any private environmental investigations or remediation activities or governmental investigations of any nature seeking to impose, or that could reasonably be expected to result in the imposition, on Parent or any of its Subsidiaries of any liability or obligation arising under any Environmental Law, pending or threatened against Parent, which liability or obligation would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. To the knowledge of Parent, there is no reasonable basis for any such proceeding, claim, action or governmental investigation that would impose any liability or obligation that would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. Parent is not subject to any agreement, order, judgment, decree, letter agreement or memorandum of understanding by or with any court, governmental authority, regulatory agency or third party imposing any liability or obligation with respect to the foregoing that would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.

4.17   Insurance. Parent and its Subsidiaries are insured with reputable insurers against such risks and in such amounts as the management of Parent reasonably has determined to be prudent and consistent with industry practice, and Parent and its Subsidiaries are in compliance in all material respects with their insurance policies, are not in default under any of the terms thereof, each such policy is outstanding and in full force and effect and, except for policies insuring against potential liabilities of officers, directors and employees of Parent and its Subsidiaries, Parent or the relevant Subsidiary thereof is the sole beneficiary of such policies, and all premiums and other payments due under any such policy have been paid, and all claims thereunder have been filed in due and timely fashion.

4.18   Loan Portfolio.

(a)     Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, each Loan of Parent and its Subsidiaries (i) is evidenced by notes, agreements or other evidences of indebtedness that are true, genuine and what they purport to be, (ii) to the extent carried on the books and records of Parent and its Subsidiaries as secured Loans, has been secured by valid charges, mortgages, pledges, security interests, restrictions, claims, liens or encumbrances, as applicable, which have been perfected and (iii) is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the obligor named therein, enforceable in accordance with its terms, subject to the Enforceability Exceptions.

(b)     Each outstanding Loan of Parent and its Subsidiaries (including Loans held for resale to investors) was solicited and originated, and is and has been administered and, where applicable, serviced, and the relevant Loan files are being maintained, in all material respects in accordance with the relevant notes or other credit or security documents, the written underwriting standards of Parent and its Subsidiaries (and, in the case of Loans held for resale to investors, the underwriting standards, if any, of the applicable investors) and with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and rules.

(c)     There are no outstanding Loans made by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to any “executive officer” or other “insider” (as each such term is defined in Regulation O promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board) of Parent or its Subsidiaries, other than Loans that are subject to and that were made and continue to be in compliance with Regulation O or that are exempt therefrom.

(d)     Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is now nor has it ever been since December 31, 2013, subject to any fine, suspension, settlement or other contract or other administrative agreement or sanction by, or any reduction in any loan purchase commitment from, any Governmental Entity or Regulatory Agency relating to the origination, sale or servicing of mortgage or consumer Loans.

4.19   4.13Takeover Protections. No Takeover Statute is applicable to this Agreement, the Integrated MergersMerger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement under the DGCL.Delaware General Corporation Law.

4.20   4.14OpinionReorganization. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, the Board of Directors of Parent has received an opinion (which, if initially rendered verbally, has beennot taken any action, and is not aware of any fact or willcircumstance, that could reasonably be confirmed byexpected to prevent the Merger from being treated as a written opinion, dated“reorganization” within the same date)meaning of Piper Jaffray & Co. to the effect that, asSection 368(a) of the date of such opinion, and based upon and subject to the factors, assumptions and limitations set forth therein, the Merger Consideration is fair from a financial point of view to Parent. Such opinion has not been amended or rescinded as of the date of this Agreement.Code.

4.21   4.15Parent Information. The information relating to Parent and its Subsidiaries (and its and their directors and officers) to be contained in the Joint Proxy Statement and theS-4 and the information relating to Parent and its Subsidiaries that is provided by Parent or its representatives for inclusion in any other document filed with any other Regulatory Agency in connection herewith will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or

omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they are made, not misleading. The Joint Proxy Statement (except for such portions thereof that relate only to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries) will comply in all material respects with the provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. The S-4 (except for such portions thereof that relate only to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries) will comply in all material respects with the provisions of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

4.22   4.16Parent Systems.

(a) The computer, information technology and data processing systems, facilities and services used by Parent or any Parent Subsidiary, including all software, hardware, networks, communications facilities, platforms and related systems and services (collectively, the “Parent Systems”), are reasonably sufficient for the conduct of the respective businesses of Parent and Parent’s Subsidiaries as currently conducted and the Parent Systems are in sufficiently good working condition to effectively perform all computing, information technology and data processing operations reasonably necessary for the operation of the respective businesses of Parent and Parent’s Subsidiaries as currently conducted, in each case, except for such failures to be reasonably sufficient or in sufficiently good working condition that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, to the knowledge of Parent, since January 1, 2015, no third party has gained unauthorized access to any Parent Systems owned or controlled by Parent or any of Parent’s Subsidiaries. Parent and Parent’s Subsidiaries have taken commercially reasonable steps and implemented commercially reasonable safeguards (i) to protect the Parent Systems from unauthorized access and from disabling codes or instructions, spyware, Trojan horses, worms, viruses or other software routines that permit or cause unauthorized access to, or disruption, impairment, disablement, or destruction of, software, data or other materials and (ii) that are designed for the purpose of reasonably mitigating the risks of cybersecurity breaches and attacks. Each of Parent and any Parent Subsidiary has in all material respects implemented reasonably appropriate backup and disaster recovery policies, procedures and systems consistent with generally accepted industry standards and sufficient to reasonably mitigate the risk of a material disruption to the operation of the respective businesses of Parent and any Parent Subsidiary.

(b) Each of Parent and any Parent Subsidiary has (i) complied in all material respects with all of its published privacy and data security policies and internal privacy and data security policies and guidelines, including with respect to the collection, storage, transmission, transfer, disclosure, destruction and use of personally identifiable information and (ii) taken commercially reasonable measures to ensure that all personally identifiable information in its possession or control is protected against loss, damage, and unauthorized access, use, modification, or other misuse. To the knowledge of Parent, since January 1, 2015, there has been no material loss, damage, or unauthorized access, use, modification, or other misuse of any such information by Parent or any Parent Subsidiary.

4.17Taxes and Tax Returns.

(a) Each of Parent and its Subsidiaries has duly and timely filed or caused to be filed (giving effect to all applicable extensions) all material Tax Returns required to be filed by any of them, and all such Tax Returns are true, correct and complete in all material respects.

(b) All material Taxes of Parent and its Subsidiaries that are due have been fully and timely paid or adequate reserves therefor have been made in accordance with GAAP on the financial statements included in the Parent Reports. Each of Parent and its Subsidiaries has withheld and paid to the relevant Governmental Entity on a timely basis all material Taxes required to have been withheld and paid in connection with amounts paid or owing to any person.

(c) There are no material Liens for Taxes on any of the assets of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries other than Liens for Taxes not yet due and payable.

(d) Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has received written notice of assessment or proposed assessment in connection with any material amount of Taxes, and there are no threatened in writing or pending disputes, claims, audits, examinations, investigations, or other proceedings regarding any material Taxes of Parent and its Subsidiaries or the assets of Parent and its Subsidiaries which have not been paid, settled or withdrawn or for which adequate reserves have not been established in accordance with GAAP in the most recent financial statements of Parent included in the Parent Reports.

4.18Employees.

(a) For purposes of this Agreement, “Parent Benefit Plans” mean all employee benefit plans (as defined in Section 3(3) of the ERISA), whether or not subject to ERISA, whether funded or unfunded, and all pension, benefit, retirement, bonus, stock option, stock purchase, employee stock ownership, restricted stock, stock-based, performance award, phantom equity, incentive, deferred compensation, retiree medical or life insurance, supplemental retirement, severance, retention, employment, consulting, termination, change in control, salary continuation, accrued leave, sick leave, vacation, paid time off, health, medical, disability, life, accidental death and dismemberment, insurance, welfare, fringe benefit and other similar plans, programs, policies, practices or arrangements or other contracts or agreements (and any amendments thereto) to or with respect to which Parent or any Subsidiary is a party or has or could reasonably be expected to have any current or future obligation or that are sponsored, maintained, contributed to or required to be contributed to by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries for the benefit of any current or former employee, officer, director, consultant or independent contractor (or any spouse or dependent of such individual) of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.

(b) Each Parent Benefit Plan has been established, operated and administered in all material respects in accordance with its terms and the requirements of all Laws, including ERISA and the Code.

(c) With respect to each Parent Benefit Plan that is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code (the “Parent Qualified Plans”), the IRS has issued a favorable determination or opinion letter with respect to each Parent Qualified Plan and the related trust, which letter has not been revoked (nor has revocation been threatened), and, to the knowledge of the Parent, there are no existing circumstances and no events have occurred that could adversely affect the qualified status of any Parent Qualified Plan or the exempt status of the related trust or increase the costs relating thereto. No trust funding any Parent Benefit Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 501(c)(9) of the Code.

(d) No Parent Benefit Plan is, and none of Parent, its Subsidiaries nor any Parent ERISA Affiliate (as defined below) has at any time during the last six years sponsored, maintained, contributed to or been obligated to contribute to any plan that is, subject to Title IV or Section 302 of ERISA or Sections 412, 430 or 4971 of the Code. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Parent ERISA Affiliate” means any trade or business, whether or not incorporated, that together with Parent would be deemed a “single employer” within the meaning of Section 4001 of ERISA.

(e) None of Parent, its Subsidiaries nor any Parent ERISA Affiliate has, at any time during the last six years, contributed to or been obligated to contribute to any plan that is a Multiemployer Plan or a Multiple Employer Plan, and none of Parent and its Subsidiaries nor any Parent ERISA Affiliate has incurred any liability to a Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer Plan as a result of a complete or partial withdrawal (as those terms are defined in Part 1 of Subtitle E of Title IV of ERISA) from a Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer Plan.

(f) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will (either alone or in conjunction with any other event) result in, cause the vesting, exercisability, delivery or funding of, or increase in the amount or value of, any payment, compensation (including stock or stock-based), right or other benefit to any employee, officer, director, independent contractor, consultant or other service provider of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, or result in any limitation on the right of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to amend, merge, terminate or receive a reversion of assets from any Parent Benefit Plan or related trust.

(g) There are no pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened material labor grievances or material unfair labor practice claims or charges against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, or any strikes or other material labor disputes against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries. Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries are party to or bound by any collective bargaining or similar agreement with any labor organization, or work rules or practices agreed to with any labor organization or employee association applicable to employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of Parent, there are no organizing efforts by any union or other group seeking to represent any employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and no employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries are represented by any labor organization.

4.19Risk Management Instruments. All Derivative Contracts, whether entered into for the account of Parent, any of its Subsidiaries or for the account of a customer of Parent or one of its Subsidiaries, were entered into in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with applicable rules, regulations and policies of any Regulatory Agency and with counterparties believed to be financially responsible at the time and are legal, valid and binding obligations of Parent or one of its Subsidiaries enforceable in accordance with their terms (except as may be limited by the Enforceability Exceptions), and are in full force and effect. Parent and each of its Subsidiaries have duly performed in all material respects all of their material obligations under each Derivative Contract to the extent that such obligations to perform have accrued, and, to the knowledge of Parent, there are no material breaches, violations or defaults or allegations or assertions of such by any party thereunder. Each such Derivative Contract has been reflected in the books and records of Parent and such Subsidiaries in accordance with GAAP consistently applied. Each Derivative Contract is evidenced by customary and appropriate documentation (including an ISDA master agreement and long-form confirmation).

4.20No Other Representations or Warranties.

(a) Except for the representations and warranties made by Parent in thisArticle IV, neither Parent nor any other person makes any express or implied representation or warranty with respect to Parent, its Subsidiaries or their respective businesses, operations, assets, liabilities, conditions (financial or otherwise) or

prospects, and Parent hereby disclaims any such other representations or warranties. In particular, without limiting the foregoing disclaimer, neither Parent nor any other person makes or has made any representation or warranty to the Company or any of its affiliates or representatives with respect to (i) any financial projection, forecast, estimate, budget or prospective information relating to Parent, any of its Subsidiaries or their respective businesses or (ii) except for the representations and warranties made by Parent in thisArticle IV, any oral or written information presented to the Company or any of its affiliates or representatives in the course of their due diligence investigation of Parent, the negotiation of this Agreement or in the course of the transactions contemplated hereby.

(b) Parent acknowledges and agrees that neither the Company nor any other person has made or is making any express or implied representation or warranty with respect to the Company, its Subsidiaries or their respective businesses, operations, assets, liabilities, conditions (financial or otherwise) or prospects, other than those contained inArticle III.

ARTICLE V

COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS

5.1Conduct of Business of the Company Prior to the Effective Time. During the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time or the earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement (including as set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule), required by lawLaw or as consented to in writing by Parent, the Company shall, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to, (a) conduct its business in the ordinary course, in all material respects,(b) use reasonable best efforts to maintain and preserve intact its business organization, employees, independent contractors and advantageous customer and

other business relationships and (c) take no action that would reasonably be expected to prevent or adversely affect or delay (x) the parties’ ability to obtain any necessary approvals of any Regulatory Agency or other Governmental Entity required for the transactions contemplated hereby or to perform the Company’s covenants and agreements under this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby on a timely basis.basis or (y) performance by the Company or its Subsidiaries of its and their covenants and agreements hereunder.

5.2Company Forbearances. During the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time or the earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement (including as set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule, as expressly contemplated by this Agreement orSchedule), as required by law,Law or as consented to in writing by Parent, which consent shall not unreasonably be withheld, the Company shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, without the prior written consent of Parent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed:to:

(a) other than in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practice, incur any indebtedness for borrowed money (other than indebtedness of the Company or any of its wholly-owned Subsidiaries to the Company or any of its other Subsidiaries), assume, guarantee, endorse or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible for the obligations of any other individual, corporation or other entity;

(b)

(i) adjust, split, combine or reclassify any capital stock;

(ii) make, declare or pay any dividend, or make any other distribution on, or directly or indirectly redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire, any shares of its capital stock or any securities or obligations convertible (whether currently convertible or convertible only after the passage of time or the occurrence of certain events) into or exchangeable for any shares of its capital stock (except (A) regular quarterly cash dividends by the Company at a rate not in excess of $0.06 per share of Company Common Stock, (B) dividends paid by any of the Subsidiaries of the Company to the Company or any of its other wholly-owned Subsidiaries, or (C)(B) the acceptance of shares of Company Common Stock as payment for the exercise price of the Company Stock Options or for withholding taxes incurred in connection with the exercise of the Company Stock Options or the vesting or settlement of theany other Company Equity Awards, in each case, in accordance with past practice and the terms of the applicable Company Benefit Plan and the applicable award agreements)agreements and (C) the declaration and payment by the Company, in respect of the second half of calendar year 2018, of one regular semi-annual cash dividend in an amount not in excess of $0.22 per share of Company Common Stock, which dividend if declared and paid shall be declared and paid, to holders of record of Company Common Stock, in each case during calendar year 2019 prior to the Closing);

(iii) grant any stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, shares of restricted sharesstock or other equity or equity-based awards or interests or grant any individual, corporation or other entity any right to acquire any shares of its capital stock; or

(iv) issue, sell or otherwise permit to become outstanding (including by issuing any shares of Company Common Stock that are held as “treasury shares” as of the date of this Agreement) any additional shares of capital stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into, or exercisable for, any shares of its capital stock or any options, warrants or other rights of any kind to acquire any shares of capital stock, except pursuant to the exercise of stock optionsCompany Stock Options or the settlement of equity compensation awards outstanding as of the date hereof and set forth inSection 3.2 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, in each case in accordance with their terms;

(c) sell, transfer, mortgage, encumber or otherwise dispose of any of its material properties or assets or any business to any individual, corporation or other entity other than a wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company, or cancel, release or assign any indebtedness to any such person or any claims held by any such person, in each case, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;business;

(d) except for transactions in the ordinary course of business, make any material investment either by purchase of stock or securities, contributions to capital, property transfers or purchase of any property or assets of any other individual, corporation or other entity other than a wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company;

(e) purchase any bank owned life insurance;

(f) terminate, materially amend, or waive any material provision of, any Company Contract, or make any change in any instrument or agreement governing the terms of any of its securities, or any material lease or contract, other than normal renewals of contracts and leases in the ordinary course of business and without material adverse changes of terms with respect to the Company, or enter into any contract that would constitute a Company Contract if it were in effect on the date of this Agreement;Agreement except for the Company’s contract with RSM for services to be rendered in 2019;

(f)(g) except as required under applicable law or the terms of any Company Benefit Plan existing as of the date hereof and set forth inSection 3.11 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, (i) enter into, adopt or terminate any employee benefit or compensation plan, program, practice, policy, contract or arrangement for the benefit or welfare of any current or former employee, officer, director, independent contractor or consultant (or any spouse or dependent of such individual), (ii) amend (whether in writing or through the interpretation of) any Company Benefit Plan, (iii) increase the compensation or benefits payable to any current or former employee, officer, director, independent contractor or consultant (or any spouse or dependent of such individual), except for annual base salary or wage increases for employees (other than directors or executive officers) in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practice, that do not exceed, with respect to any individual, twoten percent (2%(10.0%) of such individual’s base salary or wage rate in effect as of the date hereof for any employee whose 2018 salary or wages will be less than $50,000, and five percent (5.0%) of such individual’s base salary or wage rate in effect as of the date hereof for all other employees, and do not exceed three andone-half percent (3.5%) in the aggregate for all employees, (iv) pay or award, or commit to pay or award, any bonuses or incentive compensation except for bonuses to be awarded with respect to the Company’s 2018 fiscal year in the aggregate amount and on the time schedule set forth inSection 5.2(g) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, (v) grant or accelerate the vesting of any equity or equity-based awards or other compensation except for vesting that is required by the terms of the award, (vi) negotiate or enter into any new, or amend any existing, employment, severance, change in control, retention, bonus guarantee, collective bargaining agreement or similar agreement or arrangement, (vii) fund any rabbi trust or similar arrangement, (viii) terminate the employment or services of any officer or any employee whose target total annual base salary (or annual base compensation, in the case of any independent contractor or consultant) is equal to or greater than $100,000,$75,000, other than for cause (as determined in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice)business), (ix) hire or promote any officer or any employee, independent contractor or consultant who has target totalwhose annual base salary (or annual base compensation, in the case of any independent contractor or consultant) is equal to or greater than $100,000$75,000 or (x) waive, release or limit any Restrictive Covenant obligation of any current or former officer, employee, independent contractor or contractorconsultant of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries;

(g)(h) settle any material claim, suit, action or proceeding, except in the ordinary course of business in an amount andand/or for consideration not in excess of $50,000$75,000, individually or in the aggregate, and that would not impose any material restriction on the business of itthe Company or its Subsidiaries or Parent or the Surviving Corporation;Bank;

(h)(i) take any action, or knowingly fail to take any action, where such action or failure to act could reasonably be expected to prevent the Integrated Mergers, taken together,Merger from being treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesqualifying as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;

(i)(j) amend the Company Certificate, Company Bylaws or comparable governing or organizational document of any of its Subsidiaries;

(j)(k) merge or consolidate itself or any of its Subsidiaries with any other person, or restructure, reorganize or completely or partially liquidate or dissolve ititself or any of its Subsidiaries;

(k)

(l) materially restructure or materially change its investment securities or derivatives portfolio or its interest rate exposure, through purchases, sales or otherwise, or the manner in which the portfolio is classified or reported or purchase any security rated below investment grade;

(l)(m) take any action that is intended or expected to result in any of its representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement being or becoming untrue in any material respect, or in any of the conditions to the Integrated MergersMerger set forth inArticle VII not being satisfied, or in a violation of any provision of this Agreement, except, in every case, as may be required by applicable law;Agreement;

(m)(n) implement or adopt any change in its accounting principles, practices or methods, other than as may be required by GAAP;

(n)(o) (i) enter into any new line of business, or change in any material respect its lending, investment, underwriting, originating, acquiring, selling, deposit pricing, risk and asset liability management and other banking and operating securitization and servicing policies or practices (including any change in the maximum ratio or similar limits as a percentage of its capital exposure applicable with respect to its loan portfolio or any segment thereof), except as required by applicable law, regulation or policies imposed by any Governmental Entity;Regulatory Agency or (ii) make any loans or extensions of credit or grant additional credit to a current borrower, except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; or (iii) makebusiness;provided that any individual unsecured loan or extension of credit or grant of additional credit in excess of $100,000 that is not as of the date of this Agreement approved and committed (a schedule of which approved and committed loans and extensions of credit has been made available to Parent) in excess of $500,000 or any individual secured loan or extension of credit in excessor grant of $2,000,000, with respect to residential mortgage loans, and $1,000,000 with respect to all other secured loans or extensions of credit, provided that Parent shall have been deemed to have consented to any loan or extension ofadditional credit in excess of such amounts$2,500,000 that is not as of the date of this Agreement approved (a schedule of which approved loans has been made available to Parent) shall require the prior written approval of the Chief Credit Officer of Parent or otherwise not permittedanother officer designated in writing by this section if Parent, does not objectwhich approval or rejection shall be given in writing(e-mail to any such proposed loan or extension of creditsuffice) within three (3) business days of receiptafter the loan package is delivered by Parent of a request by the Company to exceed such limit along with all financialemail or other data that Parent may reasonably request in orderwritten form of delivery to evaluate such loanindividual or extension of credit;it shall be deemed approved;

(o)(p) change in any material respect its hedging practices and policies, except as required by law or requested by a Regulatory Agency;

(p)(q) make, or commit to make, any capital expenditures, except for capital expenditures in excessthe ordinary course of business consistent with past practice in amounts not exceeding $25,000 individually or $100,000 in the aggregate;

(q)(r) make, change or revoke any Tax election, adopt or change any Tax accounting method, file any amended Tax Return, settle or compromise any Tax Liability, claim or assessment or agree to an extension or waiver of the limitation period to any material Tax claim or assessment, grant any power of attorney with respect to material Taxes, surrender any right to claim a refund of material Taxes, enter into any closing agreement with respect to any material Tax or refund or amend any material Tax Return;

(r)(s) make application for the opening, relocation or closing of any, or open, relocate or close any, branch office, loan production office or other significant office or operations facility of it or its Subsidiaries;

(s)(t) materially reduce the amount of insurance coverage or fail to renew any material existing insurance policy, in each case, with respect to the key employees, properties or assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; or

(t)(u) agree to take, make any commitment to take, or adopt any resolutions of its Board of Directors or similar governing body in support of, any of the actions prohibited by thisSection 5.2.

5.3Parent ForbearancesCovenants. During the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time or the earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, except as expressly contemplated by this

Agreement (including as set forth in the Parent Disclosure Schedule, as expressly contemplated by this Agreement orSchedule), as required by law,Law or as consented to in writing by the Company, Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, without the prior written consent of the Company, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed:to:

(a) amend the Parent Certificate or Parent Bylaws in a manner that would adversely affect the economic benefits of the Integrated MergersMerger to the holders of Company Common Stock;

(b) (i) adjust, split, combine or reclassify any capital stock of Parent or (ii) make, declare or pay any dividend, or make any other distribution on, any shares of its capital stock or any securities or obligations convertible (whether currently convertible or convertible only after the passage of time or the occurrence of certain events) into or exchangeable for any shares of its capital stock (except regular quarterly cash dividends, including any increase in such quarterly cash dividends or dividends paid by any of the Subsidiaries of Parent to Parent or any of its wholly owned Subsidiaries);Parent;

(c) take any action that is intended to result in any of its representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement being or becoming untrue in any material respect, or in any of the conditions to the Integrated MergersMerger set forth inArticle VII not being satisfied, or in a violation of any provision of this Agreement, except, in every case, as may be required by applicable law;Agreement;

(d) take any action, or knowingly fail to take any action, where such action or failure to act would reasonably be expected to prevent the Integrated Mergers, taken together,Merger from being treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesqualifying as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;

(e) take any action that is intended to, would or would be reasonably be expectedlikely to adversely affectprevent or materially delay in any material respect the ability to obtain any necessary approvalsconsummation of any Regulatory Agency or other Governmental Entity required for the transactions contemplated hereby, except, in every case, as may be required by applicable Law;

(f) make, declare or to perform Parent’s covenants and agreements under this Agreement or to consummatepay any extraordinary dividend on the transactions contemplated hereby on a timely basis;capital stock of Parent; or

(f)(g) agree to take, make any commitment to take, or adopt any resolutions of its Board of Directors or similar governing body in support of, any of the actions prohibited by thisSection 5.3.

5.4Tax-free Reorganization. OfficersAppropriate officers of Parent, Merger Subthe Bank and the Company shall execute and deliver to Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and to Kilpatrick TownsendStevens & Stockton LLP,Lee, respectively, certificates containing appropriate representations and covenants, reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to such counsel, at such time or times as may be reasonably requested by such counsel, including the effective date of the Joint Proxy StatementS-4 and the Closing Date, in connection with such counsel’s deliveries of opinions with respect to the Tax treatment of the Integrated Mergers.Merger.

ARTICLE VI

ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

6.1SEC Filings; Regulatory Matters.

(a) Parent and the Company shall promptly prepare, and file with the SEC, no later than 30 business days after of the date of this Agreement, the Joint Proxy Statement and Parent shall promptly prepare and file with the SEC, theS-4, in which the Joint Proxy Statement of the Company and prospectus of Parent will be included as a prospectus.included. Each of Parent and the Company shall cooperate in respect of the form and content of any other communication with shareholdersstockholders of the Company. Each of Parent and the Company shall use their reasonable best efforts to have theS-4 declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable after such filing, and Parent and the

Company shall thereafter mail or deliver the Joint Proxy Statement to their respective shareholders.its stockholders. Parent shall also use its reasonable best efforts to obtain all necessary state securities law or “Blue Sky” permits and approvals required to carry out the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and the Company shall furnish all information concerning the Company and the holders of Company Common Stock as may be reasonably requested in connection with any such action.

(b) The parties hereto shall cooperate with each other and use their respective reasonable best efforts to promptly (and, in the case of the regulatory applications to the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, within 30thirty (30) business days ofafter the date of this Agreement) prepare and file all necessary documentation, to effect all applications, notices,

petitions and filings, to obtain as promptly as practicable all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all third parties and Governmental Entities whichthat are necessary or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including without limitation, the Integrated Mergers and the Bank Merger), and to comply with the terms and conditions of all such permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all such third parties and Governmental Entities. Parent and the Company shall have the right to review in advance and, to the extent practicable, each will consult with the other on, in each case subject to applicable lawsLaws relating to the exchange of information (and subject to necessary redactions relating to confidential or sensitive information), all the information relating to the Company or Parent, as the case may be, and any of their respective Subsidiaries, which appears in any filing made with, or written materials submitted to, any third party or any Governmental Entity in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.Agreement (including the Merger). In exercising the foregoing right, each of the parties hereto shall act reasonably and as promptly as practicable. The parties hereto agree that they will consult with each other with respect to the obtaining of all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all third parties and Governmental Entities necessary or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and each party will keep the other apprised of the status of matters relating to completion of the transactions contemplated herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary in this Agreement, nothing contained herein shall be deemed to require Parent, the Bank or the Company to take any action, or commit to take any action, or agree to any condition or restriction, in connection with obtaining the foregoing permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of Governmental Entities that would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effectmaterial adverse effect (measured on a scale relative to the Company) on any of Parent, the Bank, the Company or the Surviving Corporation,Bank, after giving effect to the Integrated MergersMerger (a “Materially Burdensome RegulatoryCondition”).

(c) Parent and the Company shall, upon request, furnish each other with all information concerning themselves, their Subsidiaries, directors, officers and shareholdersstockholders and such other matters as may be reasonably necessary or advisable in connection with the Joint Proxy Statement, theS-4 or any other statement, filing, notice or application made by or on behalf of Parent, the Company or any of their respective Subsidiaries to any Governmental Entity in connection with the Integrated Mergers, the Bank Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(d) Parent and the Company shall promptly advise each other upon receiving any communication from any Governmental Entity whose consent or approval is required for consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement that causes such party to believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that any Requisite Regulatory Approval will not be obtained or that the receipt of any such approvalRequisite Regulatory Approval will be materially delayed.delayed or conditioned. As used in this Agreement, theherein,Requisite Regulatory Approvalsshall meanmeans (i) all regulatory authorizations, consents, permits, orders or approvals from (x) the Federal Reserve Board andor the OCC and (y)(ii) any other approvals set forth inSections 3.4 and4.4 which, in each case (x) that are necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement including(including the Integrated Mergers and the Bank MergerMerger) or those(y) the failure of which to be obtained would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Surviving Corporation.Parent.

6.2Access to Information; Confidentiality.

(a) Upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable laws, each of Parent andLaw, the Company, for the purposes of enabling each of themParent to verify the representations and warranties of the otherCompany and to prepare for the

Integrated Mergers Merger and the other matterstransactions contemplated by this Agreement, shall, and shall cause each of their respectiveits Subsidiaries to, afford to the officers, employees, accountants, counsel, advisors and other representatives of the other party,Parent, access, during normal business hours during the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, to all of the itsCompany’s properties, books, contracts, commitments, personnel, information technology systems, and records (excluding Parent’s tax returnsTax Returns and related work papers),papers and eachrecords reasonably requested by Parent. The Company shall cooperate with the other partyParent in preparing to execute after the Effective Time conversion or consolidation of systems and business operations generally, and, during such period, each of Parent and the Company shall, and shall cause its respective Subsidiaries to, promptly make available to the other partyParent (i) a copy of each report, schedule, registration statement and other document filed or received by itthe Company during such period pursuant to the requirements of federal securities laws or federal or state banking laws (other than reports or documents which itthe Company is not permitted to disclose under applicable law),Law) and (ii) all

other information concerning itsthe Company’s business, properties and personnel as the other partyParent may reasonably request. Neither Parent nor the Company nor any of their respectiveits Subsidiaries shall be required to provide access to or to disclose (i) board and committee minutes that discuss any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any other subject matter the Company reasonably determines should be treated as confidential and (ii) information where such access or disclosure would violate or prejudice the rights of Parent’s or the Company’s as the case may be, customers, jeopardize the attorney-client privilege of the institution in possession or control of such information (after giving due consideration to the existence of any common interest, joint defense or similar agreement between the parties) or contravene any law, rule, regulation, order, judgment, decree, fiduciary duty or binding agreement entered into prior to the date of this Agreement. The parties heretoCompany will use commercially reasonable efforts to make appropriate substitute disclosure arrangements under circumstances in which the restrictions of the preceding sentence apply.

(b) The Company shall promptly (and in any event, not later than two (2) business days after first delivered or made available to the Board of Directors of the Company) provide (or cause to be provided) to Parent copies of any regularly prepared materials for the Board of Directors of the Company, including monthly financial statements and other regular monthly reports so provided to the Board of Directors of the Company;provided that the Company may redact (i) board and committee minutes that discuss any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any other subject matter the Company reasonably determines should be treated as confidential and (ii) any information prior to providing such materials to Parent to the extent that any such information is subject to the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine).

(c) Parent shall hold all information furnished by or on behalf of the Company or any of the Company’s Subsidiaries or representativesits Representatives pursuant toSectionSections 6.2(a) and6.2(b) in confidence to the extent required by, and in accordance with, the provisions of the confidentialityexclusivity agreement, dated April 5, 2016,August 17, 2018, between Parent and the Company (the “Confidentiality Agreement”).

(c)      Unless otherwise agreed to, but in writing byno event shall Parent the Company agrees (i) not to, and to cause its Subsidiaries and representatives not to, use any Parent Confidential Information for any purpose other than verifying the representations and warranties of Parent and preparing for the Integrated Mergers and the other matters contemplated by this Agreement and (ii) that, except as otherwise permitted by thisSection 6.2(c),be required to hold all Parent Confidential Informationany such information in confidence and not(and no restrictions as to disclose or reveal in any manner whatsoever any Parent Confidential Informationconfidentiality shall apply to any person other thansuch information) following the Company’s representatives who are actively and directly participating in the Integrated Mergers or otherwise need to know the Parent Confidential Information for the purpose of verifying the representations and warranties of Parent and who have been advised by the Company of, and have agreed to be bound by, the terms and conditions of thisSection 6.2(c). The Company shall make reasonable, necessary and appropriate efforts to safeguard the Parent Confidential Information from disclosure to any person other than as permitted by thisSection 6.2(c) and the Company shall be responsible for any breach of the terms of thisSection 6.2(c) by the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of its representatives. In the event that the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of its representatives are requested pursuant to, or required by, applicable law or regulation or by legal process to disclose any Parent Confidential Information, the Company, any such Subsidiary or any such representatives may disclose such Parent Confidential Information as so compelled provided that the Company shall promptly notify Parent in writing of such request(s) or requirement(s) to enable Parent to seek an appropriate protective order, waive compliance with the provisions of thisSection 6.2(c) or take other appropriate action to the extent not prohibited by such applicable law, regulation or legal process. The Company shall use reasonable commercial efforts, at Parent’s sole expense, to assist Parent, Parent’s Subsidiaries and Parent’s representatives in obtaining such a protective order. If, in the absence of a protective order or the receipt of a waiver hereunder, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of its representatives are nonetheless, in the reasonable opinion of the Company’s counsel, legally compelled to disclose the Parent Confidential Information to any tribunal or else stand liable for contempt or suffer other censure or significant penalty, the Company or such representative, after notice to Parent, may disclose to such tribunal only such Parent Confidential Information that such counsel advises is legally required to be disclosed. As used in thisSection 6.2(c), “Parent Confidential Information” means all information furnished by or on behalf of Parent or any of Parent’s Subsidiaries or representatives pursuant to

Section 6.2(a) and shall include all information concerning Parent, its business strategies and operations obtained or ascertained by the Company or any of its representatives as a result of any visit to any facility occupied by Parent, or furnished to the Company or its representatives by the Parent or its representatives, whether prepared by Parent, its representatives or otherwise and whether obtained or furnished before or after the date hereof and regardless of the manner in which it is furnished, together with all reports, analyses, compilations, memoranda, notes, studies or other documents or records or electronic media prepared by the Company or its representatives that contain or otherwise reflect or are generated from such information, but does not include information which (i) is or becomes generally available to the public other than as a result of a disclosure by the Company or its representatives, (ii) was available to the Company or its representatives on a non-confidential basis prior to its disclosure to the Company by Parent or its representatives, or (iii) becomes available to the Company or its representatives on a non-confidential basis from a person other than Parent or its representatives who is not otherwise known to the Company upon due inquiry to be bound not to disclose such information pursuant to a contractual, legal or fiduciary obligation.Effective Time.

(d) No investigation (or discovery of information during an investigation) by either of the partiesany party hereto or their respective representativesRepresentatives shall affect or be deemed to modify or waive the representations and warrantiesany representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement of the other parties set forth herein.herein or the conditions to any party’s obligation to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall give eitherany party hereto, directly or indirectly, the right to control or direct the operations of the other party prior to the Effective Time. Prior to the Effective Time, each party shall exercise, consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, complete control and supervision over its and its Subsidiaries’ respective operations.

6.3Shareholders’Company Stockholders’ Approvals.

(a) Each of Parent and theThe Company shall establish a record date for, call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its shareholdersstockholders (theParent Meeting” and theCompany Meeting”),” respectively) including by taking the actions that are required by Section 215a(a)(2) of the National Bank Act. The Company shall cause the Company Meeting to be held as soon as reasonably practicable after theS-4 is declared effective for the purpose of obtaining (i) the Requisite Company Vote and the Requisite Parent Vote required in connection with this Agreement and the First-Step Merger and the Parent Share Issuance and,(ii) if so desired and mutually agreed uponby the parties, the approval of other matters of the type customarily brought before a special meeting of shareholdersstockholders to approve a merger agreement or otherwise approve the transactions contemplated hereby, and eachhereby. Promptly following receipt of the Requisite Company Vote, the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to causetake such meetings to occur as promptly as reasonably practicable and onactions that are required by Section 148.B of the same date.NJ Code.

(b) Subject toSection 6.3(c) andSection 6.3(d), as applicable, the Board of Directors of eachthe Company shall (i) recommend to its stockholders the approval of Parentthis Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby (the “Company shallRecommendation”), (ii) include the Company Recommendation in the Proxy Statement, (iii) use its reasonable best efforts to obtain from the shareholdersstockholders of Parent and the Company as the case may be, the Requisite Parent Vote, in the case of Parent, and the Requisite Company Vote, in the case of the Company, including by communicating to its respective shareholders its recommendation (and including such recommendationstockholders the Company Recommendation and (iv) not withhold, withdraw, qualify or

modify, or propose publicly to withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify, in a manner adverse to Parent, the Joint Proxy Statement) that such shareholders approve (i)Company Recommendation or take any action, or make any public statement, filing or release inconsistent with the Company Recommendation, or submit this Agreement andto the transactions contemplated hereby, in the case ofCompany’s stockholders for a vote without the Company and (ii) the Parent Share Issuance, in the case of Parent.Recommendation.

(c) Subject toSection 8.1 andSection 8.2, if the Board of Directors of Parent,the Company, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors,advisor, determines in good faith that it would be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable lawLaw to continue to recommend approval of the Parent Share Issuance,this Agreement, then in submitting this Agreement to the Parent Share Issuance to its shareholders,Company’s stockholders, the Board of Directors of Parentthe Company may (but shall not be required to) modify, withdraw or change the Company Recommendation or submit this Agreement to the Parent Share Issuance to Parent’s shareholdersCompany’s stockholders without recommendationthe Company Recommendation (each, a “Company Adverse Recommendation Change”) (although the resolutions approving this Agreement as of the date hereof may not be rescinded or amended), in which event the Board of Directors of Parentthe Company may communicate the basis for its lack of a recommendation to Parent’s shareholders in the Joint Proxy Statementmodification, withdrawal, change or an appropriate amendment or supplement thereto to the extent required by law.

(d)     Subject toSection 8.1 andSection 8.2, if the Board of Directors of the Company, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors, determines

in good faith that it would be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to continue to recommend this Agreement, then in submitting this Agreement to its shareholders, the Board of Directors of the Company may (but shall not be required to) submit this Agreement to the Company’s shareholders without recommendation (although the resolutions approving this Agreement as of the date hereof may not be rescinded or amended), in which event the Board of Directors may communicate the basis for its lack of a recommendation to the Company’s shareholdersstockholders in the Joint Proxy Statement or an appropriate amendment or supplement thereto to the extent required by law;provided, that the Board of Directors of the Company may not take any actionsaction under thisSection 6.3(d) 6.3(c) unless (i) if such action is taken in response to an Acquisition Proposal and such Acquisition Proposal (x) did not result from a breach by the Company ofSection 6.13 6.12 and such Acquisition Proposal(y) constitutes a Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company gives Parent at least three (3)two (2) business days’ prior written notice of its intention to take such action and a reasonable description of the eventevents or circumstances giving rise to its determination to take such action (including if such action is taken in response to an Acquisition Proposal, its basis for determining that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal (including the latest material terms and conditions of, and the identity of the third party making, any suchthe Acquisition Proposal, or any amendment or modification thereof,thereof)); (iii) during such two (2) business day period, the Company has considered and negotiated (and has caused its Representatives to consider and negotiate) with Parent in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to so negotiate) regarding any adjustments or describe in reasonable detail such other event or circumstances))modifications to the terms and (iii)conditions of this Agreement proposed by Parent; and (iv) at the end of such notice period, the Board of Directors of the Company takes into account any amendment or modification to this Agreement proposed by Parent (itbeingunderstood that Parent shall not have any obligation to propose any adjustments, modifications or amendments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement), and after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors,advisor, again determines in good faith that it would nevertheless be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable lawLaw to continue to recommend this Agreement (and, if such action is taken in response to an Acquisition Proposal,and that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal).Proposal. Any material amendment to any Acquisition Proposal will be deemed to be a new Acquisition Proposal for purposes of thisSection 6.3(d) 6.3(c) and will require a new determination and notice period as referred to in thisSection 6.3(d) 6.3(c).

(e)     Parent or the(d) The Company shall adjourn or postpone the Parent Meeting or the Company Meeting as the case may be, if, (i) as of the time for which such meeting is originally scheduled, there are insufficient shares of Parent Common Stock or Company Common Stock as the case may be, represented (either in person or by proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the business of such meeting,the Company Meeting or if(ii) on the date of such meeting Parent or the Company as applicable,Meeting, the Company has not received proxies representing a sufficient number of shares necessary to obtain the Requisite Parent Vote or the Requisite Company Vote (Vote;itbeingunderstoodprovided that, (i)from and after such time, if Parent, pursuant toSection 6.3(c), submits the Parent Share Issuance to Parent’s shareholders without recommendation, or if (ii)any, that an Acquisition Proposal has been received by the Company pursuantand has been publicly disclosed or otherwise become public, the Company thereafter shall not be so required toSection 6.3(d), submits this Agreement to Company’s shareholders without recommendation, an adjournment adjourn or postponement of the Parent Meeting orpostpone the Company Meeting as applicable, due to an insufficient quorum or the failure to obtain the Requisite Parent Vote or the Requisite Company Vote, as applicable, shall not be required by thisSection 6.3(e)).more than two (2) times following such time. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, unless this Agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, each of the Parent Meeting and the Company Meeting shall be convened and this Agreement shall be submitted to the shareholdersstockholders of each of Parent and the Company at the Parent Meeting and the Company Meeting respectively, for the purpose of voting on the adoption of this Agreement and the Parent Share Issuance, as applicable, and the other matters contemplated hereby, and nothing contained herein shall be deemed to relieve either Parent or the Company of such obligation.obligation, including a Company Adverse Recommendation Change.

6.4Legal Conditions to Merger. Subject in all respects toSection 6.1 of this Agreement, each of Parent and the Company shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, use their reasonable best efforts (a) to take, or cause to be taken, all actions necessary, proper or advisable to comply promptly with all legal requirements that may be

imposed on such party or its Subsidiaries with respect to the Integrated Mergers and the Bank Merger and, subject to the conditions set forth inArticle VII hereof,, to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including the Merger) and (b) to obtain (and to cooperate with the other party to obtain) any material consent, authorization, permit, order or approval of, or any exemption by, any Governmental Entity and any other third party that

is required to be obtained by the Company or Parent or any of their respective Subsidiaries in connection with the Integrated Mergers, the Bank Merger and theor any other transactionstransaction contemplated by this Agreement.

6.5Stock Exchange Listing. Parent shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in the First-Step Merger to be approved for listing on the NASDAQ, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the Effective Time.

6.6Employee Matters.

(a) During the period commencing at the Effective Time and ending on the first anniversary thereof, Parent shall, or shall cause the Surviving CorporationBank to, provide the employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries who continue to be employed by Parent or its Subsidiaries (including for the avoidance of doubt, the Surviving Corporation and its Subsidiaries)Bank) immediately following the Effective Time (the “Continuing Employees”), while employed by Parent or its Subsidiaries after the Effective Time, with base salaries, wages and employee benefits (excluding equity and equity based compensation) that are substantially comparable in the aggregate to the base salaries, wages and employee benefits (excluding equity and equity-based compensation) provided to similarly situated employees of Parent and its Subsidiaries;provided that Parent may satisfy its obligation under thisSection 6.6(a) by providing or causing the Surviving CorporationBank to provide such Continuing Employees with base salaries, wages and employee benefits that are substantially comparable in the aggregate to the base salaries, wages and employee benefits (excluding equity and equity-based compensation) provided by the Company or its Subsidiaries to such Continuing Employees immediately prior to the Effective Time.

(b) With respect to any employee benefit plans of Parent or its Subsidiaries in which any Continuing Employees become eligible to participate on or after the Effective Time (the “New Plans”), Parent shall or shall cause the Surviving CorporationBank to use commercially reasonable best efforts to: (i) waive all exclusions and waiting periods with respect to participation and coverage requirements applicable to such employees and their eligible dependents under any New Plans, except to the extent suchpre-existing conditions, exclusions or waiting periods would apply under the analogous Company Benefit Plan, (ii) provide each such employee and their eligible dependents with credit for anyco-payments and deductibles paid prior to the Effective Time under a Company Benefit Plan (to the same extent that such credit was given under the analogous Company Benefit Plan prior to the Effective Time) in satisfying any applicable deductible orout-of-pocket requirements under any New Plans and (iii) recognize all service of such employees with the Company and its Subsidiaries for all purposes in any New Plan to the same extent that such service was taken into account under the analogous Company Benefit Plan prior to the Effective Time;provided that the foregoing service recognition shall not apply (A) to the extent it would result in duplication of benefits for the same period of services, (B) for purposes of any defined benefit pension plan or benefit plan that provides retiree welfare benefits, or (C) to any benefit plan that is a frozen plan or provides grandfathered benefits.

(c) Unless Parent requests otherwise in writing, effective prior to the Closing, the Company shall terminate the Ocean City HomeCapital Bank Savings and Investmentof New Jersey 401(k) Plan (the “Terminated Plan”). Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall provide Parent with resolutions adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors terminating the Terminated Plan, the form and substance of which shall be subject to the prior written approval of Parent, which will not be unreasonably withheld. As soon as practicable following the Effective Time, with respect to the Terminated Plan, Parent shall permit or cause its Subsidiaries (including ParentSurviving Bank) to permit the Continuing Employees to roll over their respective account balances and outstanding loan balances, if any, thereunder into an “eligible retirement plan” within the meaning of Section 402(c)(8)(B) of the Code maintained by Parent or its Subsidiaries (including ParentSurviving Bank).

(d)     The Board of Directors of the Company Bank shall, effective no later than immediately prior to the Effective Time (the “ESOP Termination Date”) and contingent upon the consummation of the Integrated Mergers, adopt such necessary resolutions and Company Bank shall, effective no later than the ESOP Termination Date and contingent upon the consummation of the Integrated Mergers, enter into such necessary amendments to the Ocean City Home Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Company ESOP”), in each

case, to (i) provide for the conversion into the right to receive the Merger Consideration of all shares of Company Common Stock held in the Company ESOP trust in accordance withSection 2.2 of this Agreement, (ii) direct the Company ESOP trustee to deliver a sufficient amount of cash and unallocated shares of Parent Common Stock held in the Company ESOP’s suspense account to the Company as required to repay in full any outstanding Company ESOP loan at the Effective Time and (iii) provide that no new participants shall be admitted to the Company ESOP on or after the ESOP Termination Date. The form and substance of such resolutions and any necessary amendments shall be subject to the review and prior written approval of Parent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Company shall deliver to Parent an executed copy of such resolutions and any necessary amendments promptly following their adoption by the Board of Directors of Company Bank and shall fully comply with such resolutions and any necessary amendments. The accounts of all participants and beneficiaries in the Company ESOP as of the ESOP Termination Date shall become fully vested as of the ESOP Termination Date. Any cash or unallocated shares of Parent Common Stock held in the Company ESOP’s suspense account after repayment of the Company ESOP loan shall be allocated as earnings to the accounts of the Company ESOP participants who are employed as of the ESOP Termination Date based on their account balances under the Company ESOP as of the ESOP Termination Date. Promptly following the date of this Agreement, the Company shall file or cause to be filed all necessary documents with the IRS for a determination letter for termination of the Company ESOP and shall deliver to Parent an as-filed copy of such determination letter promptly following the filling thereof by the Company with the IRS. Promptly following the receipt of a favorable determination letter from the IRS regarding the qualified status of the Company ESOP upon its termination, the account balances in the Company ESOP shall either be distributed to participants and beneficiaries or transferred to an eligible tax-qualified retirement plan or individual retirement account as a participant or beneficiary may direct. Parent agrees to permit the Company ESOP participants who become employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to roll over their account balances in the Company ESOP to the OceanFirst Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan.

(e) Nothing in this Agreement shall confer upon any employee, officer, director, independent contractor or consultant of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliates any right to continue in the employ or service of the Surviving Corporation,Bank, the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary or affiliate thereof, or shall interfere with or restrict in any way the rights of the Surviving Corporation,Bank, the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary or affiliate thereof to discharge or terminate the services of any employee, officer, director, independent contractor or consultant of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliates at any time for any reason whatsoever, with or without cause. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to (i) establish, amend, or modify any Company Benefit Plan, New Plan or any other benefit or employment plan, program, agreement or arrangement or (ii) alter or limit the ability of the Surviving CorporationBank or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliates to amend, modify or terminate any particular Company Benefit Plan, New Plan or any other benefit or employment plan, program, agreement or arrangement after the Effective Time. Without limiting the generality of the thirdfirst sentence ofSection 9.9 9.9(b), nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to or shall confer upon any person, including without limitation any current or former employee, officer, director, independent contractor or consultant (or any spouse or dependent of such individual) of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliates, any right, benefit or remedy of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.

(f)     Effective as of, and contingent upon the occurrence of,(e) At the Effective Time, Parent shall or shall cause the Surviving Corporation, to assume and honor all Company Benefit Plans in accordance with their terms, including terms related tothrough December 31, 2019, under the amendment or termination thereof. Parent hereby acknowledges that a “change in control” (or similar phrase) within the meaningvacation policies of the Company, Benefit Plans will occur atas disclosed onSection 6.6(e) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the accrued but unused vacation time of employees of the Surviving Bank who were employees of the Company prior to the Effective Time.

(f) Any employee of the Company (excluding any employee who is party to an employment agreement that provides for severance payments) whose employment is terminated (other than for cause, as defined in Parent’s severance policy) at the written request of Parent (but by and in the sole discretion of the Company) prior to the Effective Time, or is terminated by Parent or a Subsidiary of Parent within one year following the Effective Time in a manner entitling such individual to benefits under Parent’s severance policy, shall be entitled to receive severance payments in the amounts set forth onSection 6.6(f) of the Company Disclosure Schedule.

(g) Parent and the Company shall provide a retention pool as mutually agreed by Parent and the Company to certain employees of the Company. Such payments shall be made to the applicable individuals if they are still employed upon their designated “work through” date as set forth in a written retention bonus pool agreement. The form of such agreement, the amount of the payment to each individual and the timing of such payments to be agreed to in writing by Parent and the Company no later than 30 days following the date of this Agreement, and shall promptly thereafter be communicated to the employee by the Company and Parent. The maximum aggregate amount of such retention bonuses is set forth inSection 6.6(g) of the Company Disclosure Schedule.

6.7Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance.

(a) From and after the Effective Time, each of Parent and the Surviving CorporationBank shall indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director, officer or employee of the Company and its Subsidiaries (in each case, when actingfor actions taken in such capacity) (collectively, the “Company Indemnified Parties”)

against any costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, losses, damages or liabilities incurred in connection with any threatened or actual claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, whether arising before or after the Effective Time, arising out of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer or employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and pertaining to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the Effective Time, including the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, to the samefullest extent as such persons are entitled to be indemnified as of the date of this Agreement by the Company pursuant to the Company Certificate, the Company Bylaws or the governing or organizational documents of any Subsidiary of the Company; andCompany applicable to such person. Parent and the Surviving CorporationBank shall also advance expenses as incurred by such Company Indemnified Party to the samefullest extent as such persons are entitled

to advancement of expenses as of the date of this Agreement by the Company pursuant to the Company Certificate, the Company Bylaws, or the governing or organizational documents of any Subsidiary of the Company;provided, that, if required,requested by Parent, the Company Indemnified Party to whom expenses are advanced provides an undertaking (in reasonable and customary form) to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined in a final determination or by a court of competent jurisdiction that such Company Indemnified Party is not entitled to indemnification.

(b) For a period of six (6) years after the Effective Time, the Surviving CorporationParent shall cause to be maintained in effect the current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance maintained by the Company (provided, that the Surviving CorporationParent may substitute therefor its policies with a substantially comparable insurer of at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions whichthat are no less advantageous to the insured) with respect to claims arising from facts or events whichthat occurred at or before the Effective Time;provided,however, that the Surviving CorporationParent shall not be obligated to expend, on an annual basis, an amount in excess of 200%250% of the current annual premium paid as of the date hereof by the Company for such insurance (the “Premium Cap”), and if such premiums for such insurance would at any time exceed the Premium Cap, then the Surviving CorporationParent shall cause to be maintained policies of insurance which,that, in the Surviving Corporation’sParent’s good faith determination, provide the maximum coverage available at an annual premium equal to the Premium Cap. In lieu of the foregoing, the Company, in consultation with Parent, but only upon the prior written consent of Parent, may (and at the request of Parent, the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to) obtain at or prior to the Effective Time asix-year prepaid “tail” policy under the Company’s existing directors and officers insurance policy providing equivalent coverage to that described in the preceding sentence if and to the extent that the same may be obtained for an amount that, in the aggregate, does not exceed 300% of the current annual premium paid as of the date hereof by the Company forPremium Cap and, in such insurance.case, Parent shall not have any further obligations under thisSection 6.7(b), other than to maintain such prepaid “tail” policy.

(c) The provisions of thisSection 6.7 shall survive the Effective Time and are intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, each Company Indemnified Party and his or her heirs and representatives. If the Surviving CorporationParent or any of its successors or assigns, will consolidate(i) consolidates with or mergemerges into any other entity and will not be the continuing or surviving entity offollowing such consolidation or merger, transfer(ii) transfers all or substantially all of its assets or deposits to any other entity or engage(iii) engages in any similar transaction, then in each case, the Surviving CorporationParent will cause proper provision to be made so that the successors and assigns of the Surviving CorporationParent will expressly assume the obligations set forth in thisSection 6.7.

6.8Additional Agreements. In case at any time after the Effective Time any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of this Agreement (including without limitation, any merger between a Subsidiary of Parent, on the one hand, and a Subsidiary of the Company, on the other hand) or to vest Parent or the Surviving CorporationBank with full title to all properties, assets, rights, approvals, immunities and franchises of any of the parties to the Integrated Mergers,Merger or their Subsidiaries, the proper officers and directors of each party to this Agreementhereto and their respective Subsidiaries shall promptly take any and all such necessary actionactions as may be reasonably requested by Parent.

6.9Advice of Changes. Parent and the Company shall each promptly (but in no event more than 24 hours)hours following such change or event) advise the other party of any change or event (i) that (a) has had or is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on it or (ii) whichsuch party, (b) it believes would or would be reasonably likely to cause or constitute a material breach of any of itssuch party’s representations, warranties or covenants contained herein or that(c) reasonably could be expected to give rise, individually or in the aggregate, to the failure of any condition set forth inArticle VII;provided, that

any failure to give notice in accordance with the foregoing with respect to any breach shall not be deemed to constitute a violation of thisSection 6.9 or the failure of any condition set forth inSectionsSection 7.2 or7.3 to be satisfied, or otherwise constitute a breach of this Agreement by the party failing to give such notice, in each case unless the underlying breach would independently result in a failure of any of the conditions set forth inSectionsSection 7.2 or7.3 to be satisfied. The delivery and content of any such notice shall not limit or otherwise affect any right or remedy under this Agreement (including underArticle VII) of the party receiving such notice.

6.10Litigation and Claims. Each of the Company and Parent shall promptly notify the other party in writing of any action, arbitration, audit, hearing, investigation, litigation, suit, dispute, proceeding, subpoena or summons issued, commenced, brought, conducted or heard by or before, or otherwise involving, any Governmental Entity or arbitrator pending or, to the knowledge of either such party, threatened against the Company, Parent or any of their respective Subsidiaries, in each case that (a) questions or would reasonably be expected to question the validity of this Agreement, the Bank Merger Agreement or the other transactions contemplated hereby or thereby or any actions taken or to be taken by Parent, the Company or their respective Subsidiaries with respect heretoto this Agreement, the Merger or thereto,the other transactions contemplated hereby or (b) seeks to enjoin, restrain or prohibit the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.hereby. The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate at(at Parent’s own expenseexpense) in the defense or settlement of any shareholderstockholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors, officers or affiliates relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and the Company shall not agree to any such settlement of any such litigation without Parent’s prior written consent.consent which shall not unreasonably be withheld.

6.11DividendsTakeover Statutes. AfterNone of the dateCompany, Parent or their respective Boards of Directors shall knowingly take any action that would cause any Takeover Statute to become applicable to this Agreement, the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated hereby, and each shall take all reasonably necessary steps to exempt (or ensure the continued exemption of) the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby from any applicable Takeover Statute now or hereafter in effect. If any Takeover Statute may become, or may purport to be, applicable to the transactions contemplated hereby, each of Parent and the Company shall coordinate with the other the declaration of any dividends in respect of Parent Common Stock and Company Common Stock and the record dates and payment dates relating thereto, it being the intention of the parties hereto that holders of Company Common Stock shall not receive two dividends, or fail to receive one dividend, in any quarter with respect to their shares of Company Common Stock and any shares of Parent Common Stock any such holder receives in exchange therefor in the First-Step Merger.

6.12   Corporate Governance.

(a)     Effective as of the Effective Time, Parent shall, and shall cause Parent Bank to, (i) increase the size of the Board of Directors of Parent and Parent Bank to thirteen (13) members and (ii) appoint Steven E. Brady and two (2) other current members of the Board of Directors of the Company, to be selected by the Leadership Committee of Parent in consultation with the Board of Directors of Parent and the Board of Directors of the Company, to thetheir respective Boards of Directors will grant such approvals and take such actions as are reasonably necessary, provided such actions are not prohibited by Law and do not, based on the advice of Parent and Parent Bank, with one such appointee being appointed to eachoutside counsel, result in a breach of the three classesfiduciary duties of the respective Boards of Directors, so that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated hereby and otherwise act to eliminate or minimize the effects of Parent and Parent Bank.

(b)     Effective asany Takeover Statute on any of the Effective Time, Parent shall create an advisory board (the “Advisory Board”) the purpose of which shall be to advise Parent with respect to the integration of the Company’s business, as well as to maintain and develop customer and other stakeholder relationships in the Company’s market area. The Advisory Board shall consist of Steven E. Brady and the four (4) current members of the Board of Directors of the Company who are not selected for appointment to the Board of Directors of Parent in accordance withSection 6.12(a). The members of the Advisory Board shall be appointed to the Advisory Board for a term ending on the second anniversary of the Effective Time. As consideration for serving as a member of the Advisory Board and performing the duties requiredtransactions contemplated by such membership, each member of the Advisory Board shall be entitled to receive the compensation set forth inSection 6.12(b) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule.this Agreement.

6.13   6.12Acquisition Proposals.

(a) The Company agrees that it will not, and will cause its Subsidiaries and its and their officers, directors, agents, advisors and representatives (collectively, “Representatives”) not to, directly or indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit, knowinglyinduce, encourage or knowingly facilitate any inquiries or proposals with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) engage or participate in any negotiations with any person concerning orany Acquisition Proposal, (iii) provide any confidential or nonpublic

information or data to any person (other than Parent, the Bank and their Representatives in their capacity as such) concerning any Acquisition Proposal or (iv) have or participate in any discussions with any person (other than Parent, the Bank and their Representatives in their capacity as such) relating to any Acquisition Proposal, except, for purposes of this clause (iv), (x) the initial discussion in which the Company receives the Acquisition Proposal, so long as such discussion does not violate clauses (i), (ii) or (iii), or (y) to notify such person of the existence of the provisions of thisSection 6.13(a) 6.12(a);provided that, for purposes of clause (iii), that, prior to the date of the Company Meeting, in the event the Company receives an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of thisSection 6.13(a) 6.12(a), it may, and may permit its Subsidiaries and its and its Subsidiaries’ Representatives to, furnish or cause to be furnished nonpublic information or data and participate in such negotiations or discussions referenced in clause (iv) to the extent that its Board of Directors concludes in good faith (after receiving the advice of its outside counsel, and with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors)advisor) that (1)(A) such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a Superior Proposal and (2)(B) failure to take such actions would be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law;Law;provided,further, that, prior to providing any nonpublic information or data or participating in any discussions, in each case, permitted pursuant to the foregoing proviso, the Company shall have provided such information or data to Parent and shall have entered into a confidentiality agreement with such third party on terms no less favorablestringent to itsuch third party than the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement applicable to Parent, which confidentiality agreement shall not provide such personthird party with any exclusive right to negotiate with the Company or its Representatives. Without limiting the foregoing, it is agreed that any violation of the restrictions

set forth in thisSection 6.12(a) by any Subsidiary or Representative of the Company shall constitute a breach of thisSection 6.12(a) by the Company. In addition to the foregoing, the Company shall not submit to the vote of its stockholders any Acquisition Proposal other than the Merger unless, and only after, this Agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms.

(b) The Company will, and will cause its Representatives to, immediately cease and cause to be terminated any activities, discussions or negotiations conducted before the date of this Agreement with any person other(other than Parent, the Bank and their Representatives in their capacity as such) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal and will use its reasonable best efforts, subject to applicable law,Law, to (x) enforce any confidentiality, standstill or similar agreement relating to an Acquisition Proposal and (y) within ten (10) business days after the date hereof, request and confirm the return or destruction of any confidential information provided to any person (other than Parent)Parent, the Bank and their Representatives in their capacity as such) pursuant to such agreement. The Company will promptly

(c) Promptly (and in any event within twenty-four (24) hours) advise Parent following receipt of any Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry whichthat could reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal, the Company shall advise Parent of such Acquisition Proposal or inquiry and the substance thereof (including the terms and conditions of and the identity of the person making such inquiry or Acquisition Proposal, copies of any written Acquisition Proposal and written summaries of any material oral communications relating to an Acquisition Proposal), and will keep Parent apprised of any related developments, discussions and negotiations on a current basis, including any amendments to or revisions of the terms of such inquiry or Acquisition Proposal.

(b)(d) As used in this Agreement,herein,

(i) “Acquisition Proposalshall mean,means, other than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, any offer, proposal or inquiry relating to, or any third party indication of interest in, (i)(A) any acquisition or purchase, direct or indirect, of 25% or more of the consolidated assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries or 25% or more of any class of equity or voting securities of the Company or its Subsidiaries whose assets, individually or in the aggregate, constitute more than 25% of the consolidated assets of the Company, (ii)Company; (B) any tender offer (including a self-tender offer) or exchange offer that, if consummated, would result in such third partyany person (other than Parent or the Bank) beneficially owning 25% or more of any class of equity or voting securities of the Company or its Subsidiaries whose assets, individually or in the aggregate, constitute more than 25% of the consolidated assets of the Company,Company; or (iii)(C) a merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or other similar transaction involving the Company and/or its Subsidiaries whose assets, individually or in the aggregate, constitute more than 25% of the consolidated assets of the Company; and

(ii) “Superior Proposalshall meanmeans any unsolicited bona fide written offer or proposal made by a third party to consummate an Acquisition Proposal that the Company’s Board of Directors determines in good faith (after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors) (1)advisor) (A) would, if consummated, result in the acquisition of all, but not less than all, of the issued and outstanding shares of Company Common Stock or all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company; (2)(B) would result in a transaction that (A)(1) involves consideration to the holders of the shares of Company Common Stock that is, after accounting for any payment of the Termination Fee that may be required hereunder, more favorable, from a financial point of view, than the consideration to be paid to the shareholdersstockholders of the Company pursuant to this Agreement, considering, among other things, the nature of the consideration being offered and any material regulatory approvals or other risks associated with the timing of the proposed transaction beyond, or in addition to, those specifically contemplated hereby, and which proposal is not conditioned upon obtaining financing and (B)(2) is, in light of the other terms of such proposal, more favorable to the shareholdersstockholders of the Company than the Integrated MergersMerger and

the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement; and (3)(C) is reasonably likely to be completed on the terms proposed, in each case, taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of the Acquisition Proposal.

(c)

(e) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prevent the Company or its Board of Directors from complying with Rule14d-9 and Rule14e-2 under the Exchange Act with respect to an Acquisition Proposal;provided, that such Rules will in no way eliminate or modify the effect that any action pursuant to such Rules would otherwise have under this Agreement.

6.14   6.13Board of Directors and Committee Meetings. Following the receipt of the Requisite Regulatory Approvals, the Company shall permit representatives of Parent and Parentthe Bank to attend any meeting of its Board of Directors or the executive and loan committees thereof as an observer, subject to the Confidentiality Agreement;provided,that the Company shall not be required to permit such representatives to remain present during any confidential discussions of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby or any Acquisition Proposal or during any other matter (a) that the Board of Directors of the Company has reasonably determined to be confidential with respect to the participation of Parent or Parentthe Bank or (b) that the Company would not be required to disclose underSection 6.2 of this Agreement.

6.15   6.14Public Announcements. The Company and Parent shall each use their reasonable best efforts to (a) develop a joint communications plan toand ensure that all press releases and other public statementsdisclosure (including communications to employees, agents and contractors) with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby shall be consistent with such joint communications plan and (b) consult with each other before issuing any press release or, to the extent practicable, otherwise making any public disclosure with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, in each case, except in respect of any announcementpress release or public disclosure (i) required by applicable law,Law or by obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with or rules of any securities exchange or (ii) the content and messaging of which is substantially similar to consult with each other before issuing any press releasepublic disclosure previously made by Parent or tothe Company as of and following the date hereof.

6.15Operating Functions. To the extent practical, otherwise making any public statementpermitted by Law and upon Parent’s request, the Company shall regularly discuss and reasonably cooperate with respect to this Agreement orParent and the transactions contemplated hereby.

6.16   Change of Method. The CompanyBank in connection with (a) planning for the efficient and Parent shall be empowered, upon their mutual agreement, at any time prior to the Effective Time, to change the method or structure of effecting theorderly combination of the Company and the Bank and the operation of the Surviving Bank and (b) preparing for the consolidation of appropriate operating functions to be effective at the Effective Time or such later date as Parent may decide. Each party shall cooperate with the other party in preparing to execute conversion or consolidation of systems and business operations generally (including the provisions ofArticle I), ifby entering into customary confidentiality,non-disclosure and similar agreements with related service providers and other parties). Prior to the extent they both deem such change to be necessary, appropriate or desirable;provided,however, that no such changeEffective Time, each party shall (i) alter or changeexercise, consistent with the amount or kindterms and conditions of the Merger Consideration provided for in this Agreement, (ii) adversely affect the Tax treatment of the Company’s shareholders or Parent’s shareholders pursuant to this Agreement, (iii) adversely affect the Tax treatment of the Company or Parent pursuant to this Agreement or (iv) materially impede or delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in a timely manner. The Parties agree to reflect any such change in an appropriate amendment to this Agreement executed by both parties in accordance withincludingSection 8.3Article VI., complete control and supervision over its and its Subsidiaries’ respective operations.

6.17   6.16Restructuring Efforts. If either the Company or Parent shall have failed to obtain the Requisite Company Vote or the Requisite Parent Vote at the duly convened Company Meeting or Parent Meeting, as applicable, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, then, unless this Agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, each of the parties shall in good faith use its reasonable best efforts to negotiate a restructuring of the transaction provided for herein (it(it beingunderstood that neither party shall have any obligation to alter or change any material terms, including the amount or kind of the consideration to be issued to holders of the capital stock of the Company Common Stock as provided for in this Agreement, in a manner adverse to such party or its shareholders)stockholders) and/or resubmit this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby (or as restructured pursuant to thisSection 6.17 6.16) to its respective shareholdersthe Company’s stockholders for approval.

6.18   Takeover Statutes. None of the Company, Parent or their respective Boards of Directors shall take any action that would cause any Takeover Statute to become applicable to this Agreement, the Integrated Mergers, or any of the other transactions contemplated hereby, and each shall take all necessary steps to exempt (or ensure the continued exemption of) the Integrated Mergers and the other transactions contemplated hereby from any applicable Takeover Statute now or hereafter in effect. If any Takeover Statute may become, or may purport to be, applicable to the transactions contemplated hereby, each of Parent and the Company and the

members of their respective Boards of Directors will grant such approvals and take such actions as are necessary so that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated hereby and otherwise act to eliminate or minimize the effects of any Takeover Statute on any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including, if necessary, challenging the validity or applicability of any such Takeover Statute.

6.19   Exemption from Liability Under Section 16(b). The Company and Parent agree that, in order to most effectively compensate and retain the Company Insiders (as defined below), both prior to and after the Effective Time, it is desirable that the Company Insiders not be subject to a risk of liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law in connection with the conversion of shares of Company Common Stock and the Company Equity Awards in the First-Step Merger, and for that compensatory and retentive purpose agree to the provisions of thisSection 6.19. Assuming the Company delivers to Parent in a reasonably timely fashion prior to the Effective Time accurate information regarding those officers and directors of the Company subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act (the “Company Insiders”), the Board of Directors of Parent and of the Company, or a committee of non-employee directors thereof (as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 16b-3(d) under the Exchange Act), shall reasonably promptly thereafter, and in any event prior to the Effective Time, take all such steps as may be required to cause (in the case of the Company) any dispositions of Company Common Stock or the Company Equity Awards by the Company Insiders, and (in the case of Parent) any acquisitions of Parent Common Stock by any Company Insiders who, immediately following the Integrated Mergers, will be officers or directors of the Surviving Corporation subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, in each case pursuant to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, to be exempt from liability pursuant toRule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

ARTICLE VII

CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

7.1Conditions to Each Party’s Obligation To Effect the Integrated MergersMerger. The respective obligations of the parties to effect the Integrated MergersMerger shall be subject to the satisfaction or, where legally permissible, waiver by all parties hereto at or prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:

(a)ShareholderStockholder Approval. The Requisite Parent Vote and the Requisite Company Vote shall have been obtained.

(b)NASDAQ Listing. The shares of Parent Common Stock that shall be issuable pursuant to this Agreement shall have been authorized for listing on the NASDAQ, subject to official notice of issuance.

(c)Requisite Regulatory Approvals. All Requisite Regulatory Approvals shall have been obtained and shall remain in full force and effect and all statutory waiting periods in respect thereof shall have expired, and no such Requisite Regulatory Approval shall have resulted in the imposition of any Materially Burdensome Regulatory Condition.expired.

(d)S-4. TheS-4 shall have become effective under the Securities Act and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of theS-4 shall have been issued and no proceedings for that purpose shall have been initiated and continuing or threatened by the SEC and not withdrawn.SEC.

(e)No Injunctions or Restraints; Illegality. (i) No order, injunction, decree or decreeother legal restraint or prohibition issued by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation of the Integrated MergersMerger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be in effect. Noeffect; (ii) no statute, rule, regulation, order, injunction or decree shall have been enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced by any Governmental Entity whichthat prohibits or makes illegal consummation of the Integrated Mergers.

Merger and (iii) no order or injunction is being sought by any Governmental Entity that would, if entered or enforced, prohibit the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger.

7.2Conditions to Obligations of Parent. The obligation of Parent and the Bank to effect the Integrated MergersMerger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver by Parent and the Bank at or prior to the Effective Time, of the following conditions:

(a)Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties of the Company set forth inSections 3.2(a),3.7,3.8(a) and3.22(b)3.22 (in each case after giving effect to the lead in toArticle III) shall be true and correct (other than, in the case ofSection 3.2(a), such failures to be true and correct as arede minimis)minimis) in each case as of the date of this Agreement and (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such earlier date) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date, and the representations and warranties of the Company set forth inSections 3.1(a),3.1(b)3.1,3.2(b),3.3(a), and3.3(a)3.3(b)(i) (in each case, after giving effect to the lead in toArticle III) shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such earlier date) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date. All other representations and warranties of the Company set forth in this Agreement (read without giving effect to any qualification as to materiality or Material Adverse Effect set forth in such representations or warranties but, in each case, after giving effect to the lead in toArticle III) shall be true and correct in all respects as of the date of this Agreement and (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such earlier date) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date;provided,however, that for purposes of this sentence, such representations and warranties shall be deemed to be true and correct unless the failure or failures of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, either individually or in the aggregate, and without giving effect to any qualification as to materiality or Material Adverse Effect set forth in such representations or warranties, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company or the Surviving Corporation.Company. Parent shall have received a certificate, dated as of the Closing Date, signed on behalf of the Company by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company to the foregoing effect.

(b)Performance of Obligations of the Company. The Company shall have performed in all material respects the obligations required to be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and Parent shall have received a certificate, dated as of the Closing Date, signed on behalf of the Company by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company to such effect.

(c)Tax Opinion. Parent shall have received the written opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Parent, dated as of the Closing Date, to the effect that, on the basis of facts,

representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, that are consistent with the state of facts existing inat the Effective Time, the Integrated Mergers shall together be treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesMerger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering such opinion, Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP may rely upon the certificates, representations and covenants referred to inSection 5.4.

(d)FIRPTA Certificate. The Company shall have delivered to Parent a duly executed certificate, dated as of the Closing Date, in form and substance as prescribed by Treasury regulationsRegulations promulgated under Section 1445 of the Code, together with a form of notice to the Internal Revenue Service as described underSection 1.897-2(h)(2) of the Treasury Regulations, stating that the Company is not, and has not been, during the relevant period specified in Section 897(c)(1)(A)(ii) of the Code, a “United States real property holding corporation” within the meaning of Section 897(c) of the Code;provided,however, if the Company fails to deliver such certificate and notice and Parent elects to waive the receipt thereof, then notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Parent shall be entitled to withhold any amounts required to be withheld under Section 1445 of the Code.

(e)No Materially Burdensome Regulatory Condition. No Requisite Regulatory Approval shall include or contain the imposition of any Materially Burdensome Regulatory Condition.

(f)Dissenters Rights. Dissenting Shares shall constitute no more than ten percent (10%) of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock.

7.3Conditions to Obligations of the Company. The obligation of the Company to effect the Integrated MergersMerger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver by the Company at or prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:

(a)Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties of Parent set forth inSections 4.2(a),4.7,4.8 and4.84.13 (in each case, after giving effect to the lead in toArticle IV) shall be true and correct

(other (other than, in the case ofSection 4.2(a), such failures to be true and correct as arede minimis)minimis) in each case as of the date of this Agreement and (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such earlier date) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date, and the representations and warranties of Parent set forth inSections 4.1(a),4.1(b)4.1,4.2(b),4.3(a), and4.3(a)4.3(b)(i) (in each case, after giving effect to the lead in toArticle IV) shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such earlier date) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date. All other representations and warranties of Parent set forth in this Agreement (read without giving effect to any qualification as to materiality or Material Adverse Effect set forth in such representations or warranties but, in each case, after giving effect to the lead in toArticle IV) shall be true and correct in all respects as of the date of this Agreement and (except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such earlier date) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date,Date;provided,however, that for purposes of this sentence, such representations and warranties shall be deemed to be true and correct unless the failure or failures of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, either individually or in the aggregate, and without giving effect to any qualification as to materiality or Material Adverse Effect set forth in such representations or warranties, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. The Company shall have received a certificate, dated as of the Closing Date, signed on behalf of Parent by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Parent to the foregoing effect.

(b)Performance of Obligations of Parent. Parent shall have performed in all material respects the obligations required to be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and the Company shall have received a certificate, dated as of the Closing Date, signed on behalf of Parent by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Parent to such effect.

(c)Tax Opinion. The Company shall have received the written opinion of Kilpatrick TownsendStevens & Stockton LLP,Lee, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Company, dated as of the Closing Date, to the effect that, on the basis of facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, that are consistent with the state of facts existing inat the Effective Time, the Integrated Mergers shall together be treated as an integrated transaction that qualifiesMerger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering such opinion, Kilpatrick TownsendStevens & Stockton LLPLee may rely upon the certificates, representations and covenants referred to inSection 5.4.

ARTICLE VIII

TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT

8.1Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the receipt of the Requisite Company Vote or the Requisite Parent Vote:

(a) by mutual consent of Parent and the Company in a written instrument, if the Board of Directors of each so determines by a vote of a majority of the members of its entire Board;Board of Directors;

(b) by either the Board of Directors of Parent or the Board of Directors of the Company, if (i) any Governmental Entity that must grant a Requisite Regulatory Approval has denied approval of the Integrated MergersMerger or the other transactions contemplated hereby and such denial has become final and nonappealable, or(ii) any Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction shall have issued a final and nonappealable order permanently enjoining or otherwise prohibiting or making illegal the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or (iii) an application for a Requisite Regulatory Approval shall have been withdrawn at the request of the applicable Governmental Entity, unless, in the case of this clause (iii), (A) the approval of such Governmental Entity is no longer necessary under applicable Law to consummate the Merger or (B) the party whose application was withdrawn intends to file, and such filing is made no later than the thirtieth (30th) day following the date of withdrawal, a new application, filing, certificate or notice with a Governmental Entity to obtain the necessary Requisite Regulatory Approval, unless, in any such case of clause (i), (ii) or (iii), the failure to obtain a Requisite Regulatory Approval shall be due to the failure of the party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to thisSection 8.1(b)to perform or observe the covenants and agreements of such party set forth herein;

(c) by either the Board of Directors of Parent or the Board of Directors of the Company, if the Integrated MergersMerger shall not have been consummated on or before the one (1) year anniversary of the date of this AgreementAugust 31, 2019 (the “Termination Date”), unless the failure of the Integrated MergersMerger to be so consummated by such date shall be due to the failure of the party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to thisSection 8.1(c) to perform or observe the covenants and agreements of such party set forth herein;

(d) by either the Board of Directors of Parent or the Board of Directors of the Company (provided, that the terminating party is not then in material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained herein), if there shall have been a breach of any of the covenants or agreements or any of the representations or warranties (or any such representation or warranty shall cease to be true) set forth in this Agreement on the part of the Company, in the case of a termination by Parent, or Parent, in the case of a termination by the Company, which breach or failure to be true, either individually or in the aggregate with all other breaches by such party (or failures of such representations or warranties to be true), would constitute, if occurring or continuing on the Closing Date, the failure of a condition set forth inSection 7.2, in the case of a termination by Parent, orSection 7.3, in the case of a termination by the Company, and which is not cured within 45forty-five (45) days following written notice to the Company, in the case of a termination by Parent, or to Parent, in the case of a termination by the Company, or by its nature or timing cannot be cured during such period (or such fewer days as remain prior to the Termination Date);

(e)     by the Board of Directors of the Company, prior to the time the Requisite Parent Vote is obtained, if the Board of Directors of Parent shall have (i) failed to recommend in the Joint Proxy Statement that the shareholders of Parent approve the Parent Share Issuance, or withdrawn, modified or qualified such recommendation in a manner adverse to the Company, or resolved to do so, or failed to reaffirm such recommendation within two (2) business days after the Company requests in writing that such action be taken, or (ii) breached its obligations underSection 6.3 in any material respect;

(f) by the Board of Directors of Parent, prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained, if the Board of Directors of the Company shall have (i) failed to recommendmake the Company Recommendation or failed to include the Company Recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement, that the shareholders of the Company adopt this Agreement, or withdrawn, modified or qualified such recommendationthe Company Recommendation in a manner adverse to Parent, or resolved to do so, or failed to reaffirm such recommendation within two (2) business days after Parent requests in writing that such action be taken, or(ii) failed to recommend against acceptance of aany publicly disclosed tender offer or exchange offer for outstanding shares of Company Common Stock that has been publicly disclosedby any person (other than by Parent or anany affiliate of Parent), within the ten (10) business days afterday period specified in Rule14e-2(a) under the commencement of such tender or exchange offer,Exchange Act, in any such case whether or not permitted by the terms hereof, (ii)(iii) recommended or endorsed an Acquisition Proposal, or (iii)(iv) breached any of its obligations underSections 6.3Section or6.13 6.12 in any material respect;respect or (v) materially breached any of its obligations underSection 6.3;

(f) by the Company, following the Company Meeting (including any adjournments or postponements thereof), if the Company (i) received an Acquisition Proposal prior to the Company Meeting, (ii) has not breached any of its obligations underSection 6.3 orSection 6.12 and (iii) failed to obtain the Requisite Company Vote at the duly convened Company Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof; or

(g) by the Company, if itsthe Company’s Board of Directors so determines withinby a five (5) dayvote of the majority of the members of the entire Company Board, at any time during thefive-day period commencing on the first Business Day next succeeding the last day of the Determination Date,Period (as defined below), if both of the following conditions are satisfied, such termination to be effective on the tenth (10th) day following such first Business Day next succeeding the last day of the Determination Date: Period:

(i) the Parent Market Value on the Determination Date isAverage Closing Price shall be less than $14.46$20.04; and

(ii) (x) the numberParent Ratio (as defined below) shall be less than (y) the quotient obtained by dividing the Parent Market Value on the Determination Date by the Initial Parent Market Value is less than the number obtained by dividing (x) the Final Index Price by (y) the Initial Index Price minus 0.15.on the Starting Date (each as defined below) and subtracting 0.15 from the quotient in this clause (ii)(y) (such number in this clause (ii)(y) that results from dividing the Final Index Price by the Index Price on the Starting Date and subtracting 0.15 from that quotient being referred to herein as the “Index Ratio”);

subject, however, to the remainder of thisSection 8.1(g). If the Company elects to exercise its termination right pursuant to thisSection 8.1(g), it shall give written notice to Parent promptly, (andand in any event no later than the last day of the five (5) day period commencing on the Determination Date) notify Parent in writing of such election. The rightfirst Business Day next succeeding the last day of the Company to terminate this Agreement pursuant to thisSection 8.1(g) is subject to the following two sentences.Determination Period. During the five (5) day period commencing with Parent’s receipt of anythe written notice duly delivered by or on behalf ofreferenced in the Company electing to exercise the Company’s right to terminate this Agreement under thisSection 8.1(g),immediately preceding sentence, Parent shall have the option to increase the consideration to be received by the holders of Company Common Stock hereunder, by adjusting the Exchange Ratio (calculated to the nearest oneone-thousandth) to equal the lesser of (x) a quotient,number (rounded to the numerator of which is equal tonearest oneone-thousandth) obtained by dividing (A) the product of the Initial Parent Market Value,Starting Price, 0.80 and the Exchange Ratio (as then in effect), by (B) the Average Closing Price and (y) a number (rounded to the nearest oneone-thousandth) obtained by dividing (A) the product of the Index Ratio minus 0.15 and the denominator of which is equal to the Parent Market Value on the Determination Date; or (y) the quotient determined by dividing the Initial Parent Market Value by the Parent Market Value on

the Determination Date, and multiplying such quotient by the product of the Exchange Ratio (as then in effect) and 0.80.by (B) the Parent Ratio. If Parent so elects, by delivering written notice of such election to the Company within such five (5) day period Parent delivers written noticereferenced in the immediately preceding sentence, to increase the Company that it intendsconsideration to proceed with the Integrated Mergers by paying such additional consideration as contemplatedbe received by the preceding sentence, and notifiesholders of Company Common Stock by so adjusting the Company ofExchange Ratio, which notice shall set forth the revised Exchange Ratio, then no termination by the Company shall be permitted by, or shall have occurred pursuant to, thisSection 8.1(g), and this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms (except thatas the Exchange Ratio shall have been so modified). For purposes of thisSection 8.1(g) the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:

Average Closing Price” shall mean the average of the daily closing prices for the shares of Parent Common Stock during the Determination Period.

Determination Date” shall mean the first date on which all Requisite Regulatory Approvals (and waivers, if applicable) have been received (disregarding any waiting period).

Determination Period” shall mean (a) if, after the Requisite Regulatory Approvals (and waivers, if applicable) have been received, fifteen (15) or fewer days remain in the same calendar month in which such Requisite Regulatory Approvals (and waivers, if applicable) were so received (not counting for this purpose any related waiting periods), the ten (10) consecutive full trading days on which such shares are actually traded on the NASDAQ (as reported by Bloomberg or, if not reported thereby, any other authoritative source) commencing on the first trading day immediately following the Determination Date, and (b) if, after the Requisite Regulatory Approvals (and waivers, if applicable) have been received, more than fifteen (15) days remain in the same calendar month in which such Requisite Regulatory Approvals (and waivers, if applicable) were so received (not counting for this purpose any related waiting periods), the ten (10) consecutive full trading days on which such shares are actually traded on the NASDAQ (as reported by Bloomberg or, if not reported thereby, any other authoritative source) ending at the close of trading on the trading day immediately prior to the Determination Date.

Final Index Price” shall mean the average of the Index Prices during the Determination Period.

Index Group” shall mean the Nasdaq Bank Index or, if the Nasdaq Bank Index is not available, such substitute or similar index as substantially replicates the Nasdaq Bank Index.

Index Price” shall mean, with respect to any specified date, the closing price on such date of the Index Group.

Parent Ratio” shall mean the quotient obtained by dividing the Average Closing Price by the Starting Price.

Starting Date” shall mean the last trading day immediately preceding the date of the first public announcement of entry into this Agreement.

Starting Price” shall mean $25.06, adjusted as indicated in the lastsentence of thisSection 8.1(g), as set forth below.

If Parent declares or effects a stock dividend, reclassification, recapitalization,split-up, combination, exchange of shares or similar transaction between the date of this Agreement and the Determination Date, the prices for the Parent Common Stock shall be appropriately adjusted for the purposes of applying thisSection 8.1(g). For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

 (i)     the “Determination Date” means the first date on which all Requisite Regulatory Approvals (and waivers, if applicable) necessary for consummation of the Integrated Mergers have been received (disregarding any waiting period);

(ii)     the “Final Index Price” means the average of the daily closing value of the Index, for the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately preceding the Determination Date;

 (iii)    the “Index” means the NASDAQ Bank Index or, if such Index is not available, such substitute or similar Index as substantially replicates the NASDAQ Bank Index;

 (iv)     the “Index Ratio” means the Final Index Price divided by the Initial Index Price;

  (v)     the “Initial Index Price” means the closing value of the Index on the date of this Agreement;

 (vi)     the “Initial Parent Market Value” means $18.08, adjusted as indicated in the penultimate sentence ofSection 8.1(g); and

(vii)     the “Parent Market Value” means, as of any specified date, the average of the daily closing sales prices of a share of Parent Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ for the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately preceding such specified date.

8.2Effect of Termination.

(a) In the event of termination of this Agreement by either Parent or the Company as provided inSection 8.1, this Agreement shall forthwith become void and have no effect, and none of Parent, the Company, any of their respective Subsidiariesaffiliates or any of thetheir respective employees, officers, directors or directors of any of themrepresentatives shall have any liability of any nature whatsoever hereunder, or in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby, except that (i)Section 6.2(b) 6.2(c) and thisSection 8.2 andArticle IX shall survive any termination of this Agreement, and (ii) notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, neither Parent nor the Company shall be relieved or released from any liabilities or damages arising out of its fraud or any knowing, intentional and material breach of any provision of this Agreement.

(b) In the event that after the date of this Agreement and prior to the termination of this Agreement, (i) a bona fide Acquisition Proposal shall have, prior to the termination of this Agreement, been made known to senior management or the Board of Directors of the Company or has been made directly to its shareholdersstockholders generally or any person shall have publicly announced (and not withdrawn) an Acquisition Proposal or the intention to make an Acquisition Proposal (whether or not conditional) with respect to the Company, (ii) (A) thereafter this Agreement is terminated by (A) either Parent or the Company pursuant toSection 8.1(c) withoutand the Requisite Company Vote havinghas not been obtained or (B) thereafter this Agreement is terminated by Parent pursuant toSection 8.1(d), solely in the case of a willful breach of this Agreement, and (iii) on or prior to the date that is twelve (12) months after the date of such termination, the Company enters into a definitive agreement (regardless of whether a transaction is consummated) or consummates a transaction with respect to an

Acquisition Proposal (whether or not the same Acquisition Proposal as that referred to inclause (b)(i) above), then the Company shall, on the earlier of the date it enters into such definitive agreement and the date of consummation of such transaction, pay Parent, by wire transfer of same day funds, a feean amount in cash equal to $5,720,000.00$3,200,000 (the “Termination Fee”).

(c) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by Parent pursuant toSection 8.1(e), then the Company shall, no later than the close of business on the second business day following the date of termination, pay Parent, by wire transfer of same day funds, an amount in cash equal to the Termination Fee.

(d)

(i) In the event that (A) this Agreement is terminated by the Company pursuant toSection 8.1(f), and (B) the Company made a Company Adverse Recommendation Change prior to such termination, then the Company shall, on the date of termination, pay Parent, by wire transfer of same day funds, a feean amount in cash equal to the Termination Fee.Fee; or

(d)(ii) In the event that (A) this Agreement is terminated by the Company pursuant toSection 8.1(e) 8.1(f), (B) the Company did not make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change prior to such termination and (C) on or prior to the date that is twelve (12) months after the date of such termination, the Company enters into a definitive agreement (regardless of whether a transaction is consummated) or consummates a transaction with respect to an Acquisition Proposal (whether or not the same Acquisition Proposal as that referred to inSection 8.1(f) above), then Parentthe Company shall, on the earlier of the date it enters into such definitive agreement and the date of termination,consummation of such transaction, pay the Company,Parent, by wire transfer of same day funds, a feean amount in cash equal to the Termination Fee.

(e) Each of Parent and the Company acknowledges that (i) the agreements contained in thisSection 8.2 are an integral part of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and that,(ii) without these agreements, the other partyParent would not enter into this Agreement. In the event thatAgreement and (iii) the Termination Fee becomes payable and is paid by the Company or Parent, as applicable, pursuant to thisSection 8.2, the Termination Fee shall, subject to Section 8.2(a)(ii), constituteconstitutes liquidated damages and not a penalty and shall be the sole monetary remedy of the party receiving such payment (with Parent and its Subsidiaries, and the Company and its Subsidiaries, as applicable, being deemed to be one party for such purposes)itbeingunderstood that this sentence shall not limit the ability of any party hereto to enforce such party’s rights underSection 9.10 prior to the valid termination of this Agreement underSection 8.1; accordingly,penalty. Accordingly, if Parent or the Company fails promptly to pay the amount due pursuant to thisSection 8.2, and, in order to obtain such payment, the other partyParent commences a suit which results in a judgment against the non-paying partyCompany for the Termination Fee, such non-paying partyas applicable, the Company shall pay the costs and expenses of the other partyParent (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) in connection with such suit. In addition, if Parent or the Company fails to pay the amounts payable pursuant to thisSection 8.2, when due, then such partythe Company shall pay interest on such overdue amounts at a rate per annum equal to the “prime rate” (as announced by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or any successor thereto) in effect on the date on which such payment was required to be made for the period commencing as of the date that such overdue amount was originally required to be paid.

(f) Without limiting any amount that may be payable by the Company underSection 8.2(e), the Termination Fee constitutes liquidated damages and not a penalty, and, except in the cause of fraud or a knowing, intentional and material breach, shall be the sole monetary remedy of Parent in the event of a termination of this Agreement.

8.3Amendment. Subject to compliance with applicable law,Law, this Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto, by action taken or authorized by their respective Boards of Directors, at any time before or after approval of the matters presented in connection with the Integrated MergersMerger by the shareholders of Parent and the shareholdersstockholders of the Company;provided,however, that after adoption of this Agreement by the shareholdersstockholders of the Company, or the approval of the Parent Share Issuance by the shareholders of Parent, there may not be, without further approval of such shareholders,stockholders, any amendment of this Agreement that requires further approval of the Company stockholders under applicable law.Law. This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto.

8.4Extension;Extension; Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time, the parties, hereto, by action taken or authorized by their respective Boards of Directors, may, to the extent legally permitted, extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other parties hereto, waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto and waive compliance with any of the agreements or satisfaction of any conditions contained herein;provided,however, that, after adoption of this Agreement by the shareholdersstockholders of the Company, or the approval of the Parent Share Issuance by the shareholders of Parent, there may not be, without further approval of such shareholders,the Company stockholders, any extension or waiver of this Agreement or any portion thereof that requires further approval of the Company stockholders under applicable law.Law. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in a written instrument signed on behalf of such party, but such extension or waiver or failure to insist on strict compliance with an obligation, covenant, agreement or condition shall not operate as a waiver of, or estoppel with respect to, any subsequent or other failure to comply with an obligation, covenant, agreement or condition.

ARTICLE IX

GENERAL PROVISIONS

9.1Nonsurvival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements. None of the representations, warranties, covenants andor other agreements in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement (other than the Confidentiality Agreement, which shall survive in accordance with its terms) shall survive the Effective Time except forSection 6.7 and for those other(other than agreements or covenants and agreements contained herein and therein whichthat by their express terms apply in whole or in partare to be performed after the Effective Time.Time, includingSections 2.5, 6.6 and6.7).

9.2Expenses. Except as expressly provided herein (includingSection 8.2), all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such expense;provided,however, that the costs and expenses of printing and mailing the Joint Proxy Statement shall be borne proportionately by Parent and the Company based on the number of shareholders of such party and all filing and other fees paid to the SEC in connection with the Integrated MergersMerger shall be borneshared equally by the Parent and the Company.

9.3Notices. All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if delivered personally, telecopied or emailed (with confirmation), mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) or delivered by an express courier (with confirmation) to the parties at the following addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like notice):

if to the Company, to:

Ocean Shore Holding Co.

1001 Asbury Avenue

Ocean City,Capital Bank of New Jersey 08226

Attention:         Steven E. Brady175 South Main Road

Facsimile:         (609) 399-3614Vineland, NJ 08360

Email:               sbrady@ochome.com
Attention:

David J. Hanrahan Sr.

Facsimile:

(856)691-9033

Email:

dhanrahan@capitalbanknj.com

With a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

Kilpatrick TownsendStevens & Stockton LLPLee

607 14th Street, NW,Princeton Pike Corporate Center

100 Lenox Drive, Suite 900200

Washington, D.C. 20015Lawrenceville, NJ 08648

Attention:         Aaron M. Kaslow

Facsimile:         (202) 204-5600

Email:               Akaslow@kilpatricktownsend.com
Attention:

Edward C. Hogan

Facsimile:

(610)371-7387

Email:

ech@stevenslee.com

and

if to Parent or the Bank, to:

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

975 Hooper Avenue110 West Front Street

Toms River,Red Bank, New Jersey 0875307701

Attention:         Christopher D. Maher

Facsimile:         (732) 349-5070

Email:               cmaher@oceanfirst.com

Attention:

Christopher D. Maher

Facsimile:

(732)349-5070

Email:

cmaher@oceanfirst.com

With a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Four Times Square

New York, New York 10036

Attention:

David C. Ingles

Facsimile:

(917)777-2697

Email:

Attention:         David C. Ingles

Facsimile:         (917) 777-2697

Email:               David.Ingles@skadden.com

9.4Interpretation. The parties have participated jointly in negotiating and drafting this Agreement. In the event that an ambiguity or a question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties, and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement. When a reference is made in this Agreement to Articles, Sections, Exhibits or Schedules, such reference shall be to an Article or Section of or Exhibit or Schedule to this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents, defined term index and headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words “include,” “includes” or “including” are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation.” References to “business dayshall meanmeans any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which banks in New York, New York or New Jersey are authorized or obligated by law to close. References to “the date hereofshall meanmeans the date of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, theherein,knowledge of the Company” means the actual knowledge (after due inquiry) of any of the officers of the Company, and the “knowledge of Parent” means the actual knowledge (after due inquiry) of any of the officers of Parent. References to “ordinary course of business” means the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice in all material respects of the applicable person. As used herein, (i) the term(a)person” means any individual, corporation (includingnot-for-profit), general or limited partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, estate, trust, association, organization, Governmental Entity or other entity of any kind or nature, (ii)(b) an “affiliate” of a specified person is any person that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such specified person, (iii)(c) unless the context otherwise requires, the termparty” means a party to this agreementAgreement irrespective of whether such term is followed by the word “hereto” or the words “to this Agreement” and (iv) the term(d)made available” means any document or other information that was (a) provided in writing by one party or its representatives to the other party and its representatives prior to the date hereof, (b)(i) included in the virtual data room of a party at least two (2) business days prior to the date hereof, or (c)(ii) filed by a partyParent with the SEC and publicly available on EDGAR at least two (2) business days prior to the date hereof or (iii) actually delivered to and received by the other party prior to the date hereof. The Company Disclosure Schedule and the Parent Disclosure Schedule, as well as all other schedules and all exhibits hereto, shall be deemed part of this Agreement and included in any reference to this Agreement.

9.5Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed (including in any manner permitted bySection 9.12 of this Agreement) in counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart.

9.6Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the documents and the instruments referred to herein) together with the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. The Company Disclosure Schedule and the Parent Disclosure Schedule, as well as all other schedules and the exhibits hereto, shall be deemed part of this Agreement and included in any reference to this Agreement.

9.7Governing Law; Jurisdiction.

(a) This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to any applicable conflicts of law (except that the matters relating to the fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors of the Company shall be subject to the laws of the State of New Jersey).

(b) Each party agrees that it will bring any action or proceeding in respect of any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby exclusively in any federal or state

court sitting in the State of Delaware (the “Chosen Courts”), and, solely in connection with claims arising under this Agreement or the transactions that are the subject of this Agreement, (i) irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Chosen Courts, (ii) waives any objection to laying venue in any such action or proceeding in the Chosen Courts, (iii) waives any objection that the Chosen Courts are an inconvenient forum or do not have jurisdiction over any party and (iv) agrees that service of process upon such party in any such action or proceeding will be effective if notice is given in accordance withSection 9.3.

9.8Waiver of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE EACH SUCH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AT THE TIME OF INSTITUTION OF THE APPLICABLE LITIGATION, ANY RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT: (I)(A) NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER, (II)(B) EACH PARTY UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (III)(C) EACH PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER VOLUNTARILY AND (IV)(D) EACH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THISSECTION 9.8.

9.9Assignment; Third Party Beneficiaries.

(a) Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties hereto (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other party. Any purported assignment in contravention hereof shall be null and void. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

(b) Except as otherwise specifically provided inSection 6.7, this Agreement (including the documents and instruments referred to herein) is not intended to, and does not, confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder, including the right to rely upon the representations and warranties set forth herein. The representations and warranties in this Agreement are the product of negotiations among the parties hereto and are for the sole benefit of the parties. Any inaccuracies in such representations and warranties are subject to waiver by the parties hereto in accordance herewith without notice or liability to any other person. In some instances, the representations and warranties in this Agreement may represent an allocation among the parties hereto of risks associated with particular matters regardless of the knowledge of any of the parties hereto. Consequently, persons other than the parties may not rely upon the representations and warranties in this Agreement as characterizations of actual facts or circumstances as of the date of this Agreement or as of any other date.

9.10Remedies; Specific Performance. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any and all remedies herein expressly conferred upon a party will be deemed cumulative with and not exclusive of any other

remedy expressly conferred hereby, and the exercise by a party of any one such remedy will not preclude the exercise of any other such remedy. The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur if any provision of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with the terms hereof and, accordingly, that the parties shall be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce specifically the performance of the terms and provisions hereof (including the parties’ obligation to consummate the Integrated Mergers)Merger), in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. Each of the parties hereby further waives (a) any defense in any action for specific performance that a remedy at law would be adequate and (b) any requirement under any law to post security or a bond as a prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief.

9.11Severability. Whenever possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law,Law, but if any provision or portion of any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable lawLaw or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other

provision or portion of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement shall be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction such that the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion thereof shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

9.12Delivery by Facsimile or Electronic Transmission. This Agreement and any signed agreement or instrument entered into in connection with this Agreement, and any amendments or waivers hereto or thereto, to the extent signed and delivered by means of a facsimile machine or bye-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original agreement or instrument and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person. No party hereto or to any such agreement or instrument shall (and each party hereto shall cause its Subsidiaries and Representatives not to) raise the use of a facsimile machine ore-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file to deliver a signature to this Agreement or any amendmentsigned agreement or instrument entered into in connection with this Agreement, or any amendments or waivers hereto or thereto, or the fact that any signature or agreement or instrument was transmitted or communicated through the use of a facsimile machine ore-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file as a defense to the formation of a contract, and each party hereto forever waives any such defense.

[Signature Page Follows]

Four Times Square

New York, New York 10036

Attention:

David C. Ingles

Facsimile:

(917)777-2697

Email:

David.Ingles@skadden.com

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub9.4Interpretation. The parties have participated jointly in negotiating and drafting this Agreement. In the Company have causedevent that an ambiguity or a question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties, and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement. When a reference is made in this Agreement to Articles, Sections, Exhibits or Schedules, such reference shall be to an Article or Section of or Exhibit or Schedule to this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents, defined term index and headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words “include,” “includes” or “including” are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation.” References to “business day” means any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which banks in New York, New York are authorized or obligated by law to close. References to “the date hereof” means the date of this Agreement. As used herein, “knowledge of the Company” means the actual knowledge (after due inquiry) of any of the officers of the Company, and the “knowledge of Parent” means the actual knowledge (after due inquiry) of any of the officers of Parent. References to “ordinary course of business” means the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice in all material respects of the applicable person. As used herein, (a) “person” means any individual, corporation (includingnot-for-profit), general or limited partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, estate, trust, association, organization, Governmental Entity or other entity of any kind or nature, (b) an “affiliate” of a specified person is any person that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such specified person, (c) unless the context otherwise requires, “party” means a party to this Agreement irrespective of whether such term is followed by the word “hereto” or the words “to this Agreement” and (d) “made available” means any document or other information that was (i) included in the virtual data room of a party at least two (2) business days prior to the date hereof, (ii) filed by Parent with the SEC and publicly available on EDGAR at least two (2) business days prior to the date hereof or (iii) actually delivered to and received by the other party prior to the date hereof.

9.5Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed (including in any manner permitted bySection 9.12 of this Agreement) in counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized aseach of the date first above written.parties and delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart.

OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP.

By:

/s/ Christopher Maher

Name: Christopher Maher

Title:   President & CEO

MASTERS MERGER SUB CORP.

By:

/s/ Christopher Maher

Name: Christopher Maher

Title:   President & CEO

OCEAN SHORE HOLDING CO.

By:

/s/ Steven E. Brady

Name: Steven E. Brady

Title:   President & CEO

[Signature Page to9.6Entire Agreement and Plan of Merger]


Annex B

EXECUTION VERSION

VOTING AGREEMENT

. This VOTING AGREEMENT, dated as of July 12, 2016 (this “Agreement”), is by and between OceanFirst Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), (including the documents and the undersigned shareholder (the “Shareholder”) of Ocean Shore Holding Co., a New Jersey corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings specified in the Merger Agreement (as defined below).

WHEREAS, concurrentlyinstruments referred to herein) together with the executionConfidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. The Company Disclosure Schedule and the Parent Disclosure Schedule, as well as all other schedules and the exhibits hereto, shall be deemed part of this Agreement the Company, Parent and Masters Merger Sub Corp., a New Jersey corporation (“included in any reference to this Agreement.

9.7Merger SubGoverning Law; Jurisdiction”), are entering into an.

(a) This Agreement shall be governed and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other transactions, (i) Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company on the terms and conditions set forth therein,construed in accordance with the Company surviving such merger (the “First-Step Merger”) and (ii) immediately thereafter, the Company will merge with and into Parent, with Parent being the surviving corporation (collectively with the First-Step Merger, the “Integrated Mergers”) and, in connection therewith, the shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,laws of the Company (“Company Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will, without any further action on the partState of the holder thereof, be automatically converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration as set forth in the Merger Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein;

WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, the Shareholder is the record and beneficial owner of, has the sole right to dispose of and, subject to Article III, Section 3.04 of the Company Certificate, has the sole right to vote, the number of shares of Company Common Stock set forth below the Shareholder’s signature on the signature page hereto (such Company Common Stock, together with any other capital stock of the Company acquired by the Shareholder after the execution of this Agreement, whether acquired directly or indirectly, upon the exercise of options, conversion of convertible securities or otherwise, and any other securities issued by the Company that are entitled to vote on the approval the Merger Agreement held or acquired by the Shareholder (whether acquired heretofore or hereafter), being collectively referred to herein as the “Shares”);

WHEREAS, obtaining the Requisite Company Vote is a condition to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and

WHEREAS, as an inducement to Parent to enter into the Merger Agreement and incur the obligations set forth therein, Parent has required that the Shareholder enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

Section  1.     Agreement to Vote; Restrictions on Voting and Dispositions.

  (a)    Agreement to Vote Company Common Stock. The Shareholder hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that from the date hereof until the Expiration Time (as defined below), at any meeting (whether annual or special and each adjourned or postponed meeting) of the Company’s shareholders, however called, the Shareholder will (x) appear at such meeting or, subject to Article III, Section 3.04 of the Company Certificate, otherwise cause all of the Shareholder’s Shares to be counted as present thereat for purposes of establishing a quorum and (y) subject to Article III, Section 3.04 of the Company Certificate, vote or cause to be voted all of such Shares, (1) in favor of the approval of the Merger Agreement, the First-Step Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (2) against any Acquisition Proposal,Delaware, without regard to any recommendationapplicable conflicts of law (except that the matters relating to the shareholdersfiduciary duties of the Company by the Board of Directors of the Company

concerning such Acquisition Proposal, and without regard shall be subject to the termslaws of such Acquisition Proposal,the State of New Jersey).

(b) Each party agrees that it will bring any action or other proposal madeproceeding in oppositionrespect of any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement or that is otherwise in competition or inconsistent with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (3) againsthereby exclusively in any agreement, amendment of any agreement (including the Company Certificate and the Company Bylaws),federal or any other action that is intended or would reasonably be expected to prevent, impede, or interfere with, delay, postpone, or discourage the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and (4) against any action, agreement, transaction or proposal that would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant, agreement or other obligation of the Companystate court sitting in the Merger Agreement.

  (b)      Restrictions on Transfers. The Shareholder hereby agrees that, from the date hereof until the earlierState of the receipt of the Requisite Company Vote or the Expiration Time, the Shareholder shall not,Delaware (the “Chosen Courts”), and, shall not enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding to, directly or indirectly, sell, offer to sell, give, pledge, grant a security interest in, encumber, assign, grant any option for the sale of or otherwise transfer or dispose of (each, a “Transfer”) any Shares (i) other thansolely in connection with bona fide estate planning purposesclaims arising under this Agreement or the transactions that are the subject of this Agreement, (i) irrevocably submits to histhe exclusive jurisdiction of the Chosen Courts, (ii) waives any objection to laying venue in any such action or her affiliatesproceeding in the Chosen Courts, (iii) waives any objection that the Chosen Courts are an inconvenient forum or immediate family members;provideddo not have jurisdiction over any party and (iv) agrees that as a condition toservice of process upon such Transfer,party in any such affiliateaction or immediate family member, as applicable,proceeding will be effective if notice is given in accordance withSection 9.3.

9.8Waiver of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE EACH SUCH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AT THE TIME OF INSTITUTION OF THE APPLICABLE LITIGATION, ANY RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT: (A) NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER, (B) EACH PARTY UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (C) EACH PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER VOLUNTARILY AND (D) EACH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THISSECTION 9.8.

9.9Assignment; Third Party Beneficiaries.

(a) Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder shall be required to execute an agreement that is identical in form and substance to this Agreement;provided,further, that the Shareholder shall remain jointly and severally liable for the breachesassigned by any of his or her affiliates or immediate family members of the terms of such identical agreement, (ii) except in connection with (A) the exercise of outstanding stock options in order to pay the exercise price of such stock options or satisfy any withholding taxes triggeredparties hereto (whether by such exercise or (B) the withholding or sale of the minimum number of shares necessary to satisfy withholding taxes triggered by the vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards; or (iii) by will or operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other party. Any purported assignment in which case this Agreement shall bind the transferee. Any Transfer in violation of this Section 1(b)contravention hereof shall be null and void. The Shareholder further agreesSubject to authorizethe preceding sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and request the Company to notify the Company’s transfer agent that there is a stop transfer order with respect to all of the Shares ownedbe enforceable by the Shareholder.parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

  (c)      (b) Except as otherwise specifically provided inTransfer of Voting RightsSection. The Shareholder hereby agrees that the Shareholder shall not deposit any Shares in a voting trust, grant any proxy or power of attorney or enter into any voting agreement or similar agreement, arrangement or understanding in contravention of the obligations of the Shareholder under 6.7, this Agreement with respect(including the documents and instruments referred to any of the Shares.

  (d)      Acquired Shares. Any Shares or other voting securities of the Company with respectherein) is not intended to, which beneficial ownership is acquired by the Shareholder or any of his or her affiliates, including, without limitation, by purchase, as a result of a stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, combination, reclassification, exchange or change of such Shares or upon exercise or conversion of any securities of the Company, if any, after the date hereof shall automatically become subject to the terms of this Agreement.

  (e)     No Inconsistent Agreements. The Shareholder hereby agrees that he or she shall not enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person prior to the termination of this Agreement, directly or indirectly, to vote, grant a proxy or power of attorney or give instructions with respect to the voting of the Shareholder’s Shares in any manner which is inconsistent with this Agreement.

Section  2.      Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Shareholder.

  (a)      Representations and Warranties. The Shareholder represents and warrants to Parent as follows:

     (i)    Capacity; Consents. The Shareholder is an individual and has all requisite capacity, power and authority to enter into and perform his or her obligations under this Agreement. No filing with, and no permit, authorization, consent or approval of, a Governmental Entity is necessary on the part of the Shareholder for the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Shareholder or the consummation by the Shareholder of the transactions contemplated hereby.

     (ii)    Due Execution. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Shareholder.

     (iii)    Binding Agreement. Assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent, this Agreement constitutes the valid and binding agreement of the Shareholder, enforceable against the Shareholder in accordance with its terms (except in all cases as such enforceability may be limited by the Enforceability Exceptions.

     (iv)    Non-Contravention. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Shareholder does not, and the performance by the Shareholder of his or her obligations hereunder and the consummation by the Shareholder of the transactions contemplated hereby will not, violate or conflict with, or constitute a default under,confer upon any agreement, instrument, contract or other obligation or any order, arbitration award, judgment or decree to which the Shareholder is a party or by which the Shareholder or his or her property or assets is bound, or any statute, rule or regulation to which the Shareholder or his or her property or assets is subject. Except as contemplated by this Agreement, neither the Shareholder nor any of his or her affiliates (1) has entered into any voting agreement or voting trust with respect to any Shares or entered into any other contract relating to the voting, transfer or disposition of the Shares or (2) has appointed or granted a proxy or power of attorney with respect to any Shares.

     (v)    Ownership of Shares. Except for restrictions in favor of Parent pursuant to this Agreement or voting restrictions contained in Article III, Section 3.04 of the Company Certificate, the Shareholder owns, beneficially and of record, all of the Shareholder’s Shares free and clear of any proxy or voting restriction, and has sole voting power and sole power of disposition with respect to such Shares with no restrictions on the Shareholder’s rights of voting or disposition pertaining thereto, and no person other than the Shareholder hasparties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder, including the right to directrely upon the representations and warranties set forth herein. The representations and warranties in this Agreement are the product of negotiations among the parties hereto and are for the sole benefit of the parties. Any inaccuracies in such representations and warranties are subject to waiver by the parties hereto in accordance herewith without notice or approveliability to any other person. In some instances, the voting or dispositionrepresentations and warranties in this Agreement may represent an allocation among the parties hereto of risks associated with particular matters regardless of the knowledge of any of the Shareholder’s Shares. Asparties hereto. Consequently, persons other than the parties may not rely upon the representations and warranties in this Agreement as characterizations of actual facts or circumstances as of the date hereof, the number of the Shareholder’s Shares is set forth below the Shareholder’s signature on the signature page hereto.

     (vi)    Legal Actions. There is no action, suit, investigation, complaintthis Agreement or other proceeding pending against the Shareholder or, to the knowledgeas of the Shareholder, any other person or, to the knowledgedate.

9.10Remedies; Specific Performance. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any and all remedies herein expressly conferred upon a party will be deemed cumulative with and not exclusive of the Shareholder, threatened against the Shareholder or any other person that restricts or prohibits (or, if successful, would restrict or prohibit)

remedy expressly conferred hereby, and the exercise by Parenta party of its rights underany one such remedy will not preclude the exercise of any other such remedy. The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur if any provision of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with the terms hereof and, accordingly, that the parties shall be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce specifically the performance byof the terms and provisions hereof (including the parties’ obligation to consummate the Merger), in addition to any partyother remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. Each of its obligations under this Agreement.

  (b)      Covenants. From the date hereof until the Expiration Time:

     (i)     The Shareholder agrees not to takeparties hereby further waives (a) any defense in any action for specific performance that a remedy at law would makebe adequate and (b) any representationrequirement under any law to post security or warrantya bond as a prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief.

9.11Severability. Whenever possible, each provision or portion of the Shareholder contained herein untrue or incorrect or have the effect of preventing, impeding, delaying, interfering with or adversely affecting the performance by the Shareholder of his or her obligations under this Agreement.

     (ii)    The Shareholder hereby agrees to promptly notify Parent of the number of shares of Company Common Stock acquired by the Shareholder, if any after the date hereof. Any such shares shall be subject to the termsprovision of this Agreement as though owned by the Shareholder on the date hereof and shall be deemed “Shares” for all purposes hereof.

     (iii)   The Shareholder hereby authorizes Parentinterpreted in such manner as to be effective and the Company to publish and disclose invalid under Law, but if any announcementprovision or disclosure required by applicable law andportion of any proxy statement or prospectus filed in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement the Shareholder’s identity and ownership of the Shares and the nature of the Shareholder’s obligation under this Agreement.

Section  3.     Further Assurances. From time to time, at the request of Parent and without further consideration, the Shareholder shall execute and deliver such additional documents and take all such further action as may be necessary to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

Section  4.      Termination. Other than this Section 4 and Section 5, which shall survive any terminationprovision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any Law or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or portion of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement will terminate uponshall be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction such that the earlier of (a) the Effective Timeinvalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion thereof shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

9.12Delivery by Facsimile or Electronic Transmission. This Agreement and (b) the date of termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms (the “Expiration Time”);provided that no such termination shall relieve any party hereto from any liability for any breach of this Agreement occurring prior to such termination.

Section  5.      Miscellaneous.

  (a)       Expenses. All expenses incurredsigned agreement or instrument entered into in connection with this Agreement, and any amendments or waivers hereto or thereto, to the transactions contemplatedextent signed and delivered by means of a facsimile machine or bye-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original agreement or instrument and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person. No party hereto shall (and each party hereto shall cause its Subsidiaries and Representatives not to) raise the use of a facsimile machine ore-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file to deliver a signature to this Agreement shall be paid byor any signed agreement or instrument entered into in connection with this Agreement, or any amendments or waivers hereto or thereto, or the party incurring such expenses.

  (b)    Notices. Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be sufficient if in writing, and sent by email or facsimile transmission (providedfact that any notice received bysignature or agreement or instrument was transmitted or communicated through the use of a facsimile transmissionmachine or otherwise ate-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file as a defense to the addressee’s location onformation of a contract, and each party hereto forever waives any business day after 5:00 p.m. (addressee’s local time) shall be deemed to have been received at 9:00 a.m. (addressee’s local time) on the next business day), by reliable overnight delivery service (with proof of service), hand delivery or certified or registered mail (return receipt requested and first-class postage prepaid), addressed as follows:such defense.

    (i)       If to Parent, to:

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

975 Hooper Avenue

Toms River, New Jersey 08753

Attention: Christopher D. Maher

Facsimile: (732) 349-5070

Email: cmaher@oceanfirst.com

with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

[

Four Times Square

New York, New York 10036

Attention:

David C. Ingles

Facsimile:

(917)777-2697

Email:

David.Ingles@skadden.com

9.4Interpretation. The parties have participated jointly in negotiating and drafting this Agreement. In the event that an ambiguity or a question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties, and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement. When a reference is made in this Agreement to Articles, Sections, Exhibits or Schedules, such reference shall be to an Article or Section of or Exhibit or Schedule to this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents, defined term index and headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words “include,” “includes” or “including” are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation.” References to “business day” means any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which banks in New York, New York are authorized or obligated by law to close. References to “the date hereof” means the date of this Agreement. As used herein, “knowledge of the Company” means the actual knowledge (after due inquiry) of any of the officers of the Company, and the “knowledge of Parent” means the actual knowledge (after due inquiry) of any of the officers of Parent. References to “ordinary course of business” means the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice in all material respects of the applicable person. As used herein, (a) “person” means any individual, corporation (includingnot-for-profit), general or limited partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, estate, trust, association, organization, Governmental Entity or other entity of any kind or nature, (b) an “affiliate” of a specified person is any person that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such specified person, (c) unless the context otherwise requires, “party” means a party to this Agreement irrespective of whether such term is followed by the word “hereto” or the words “to this Agreement” and (d) “made available” means any document or other information that was (i) included in the virtual data room of a party at least two (2) business days prior to the date hereof, (ii) filed by Parent with the SEC and publicly available on EDGAR at least two (2) business days prior to the date hereof or (iii) actually delivered to and received by the other party prior to the date hereof.

9.5Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed (including in any manner permitted bySection 9.12 of this Agreement) in counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart.

9.6Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the documents and the instruments referred to herein) together with the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. The Company Disclosure Schedule and the Parent Disclosure Schedule, as well as all other schedules and the exhibits hereto, shall be deemed part of this Agreement and included in any reference to this Agreement.

9.7Governing Law; Jurisdiction.

(a) This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to any applicable conflicts of law (except that the matters relating to the fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors of the Company shall be subject to the laws of the State of New Jersey).

(b) Each party agrees that it will bring any action or proceeding in respect of any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby exclusively in any federal or state court sitting in the State of Delaware (the “Chosen Courts”), and, solely in connection with claims arising under this Agreement or the transactions that are the subject of this Agreement, (i) irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Chosen Courts, (ii) waives any objection to laying venue in any such action or proceeding in the Chosen Courts, (iii) waives any objection that the Chosen Courts are an inconvenient forum or do not have jurisdiction over any party and (iv) agrees that service of process upon such party in any such action or proceeding will be effective if notice is given in accordance withSection 9.3.

9.8Waiver of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE EACH SUCH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AT THE TIME OF INSTITUTION OF THE APPLICABLE LITIGATION, ANY RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT: (A) NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER, (B) EACH PARTY UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (C) EACH PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER VOLUNTARILY AND (D) EACH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THISSECTION 9.8.

9.9Assignment; Third Party Beneficiaries.

(a) Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties hereto (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other party. Any purported assignment in contravention hereof shall be null and void. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

(b) Except as otherwise specifically provided inSection 6.7, this Agreement (including the documents and instruments referred to herein) is not intended to, and does not, confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder, including the right to rely upon the representations and warranties set forth herein. The representations and warranties in this Agreement are the product of negotiations among the parties hereto and are for the sole benefit of the parties. Any inaccuracies in such representations and warranties are subject to waiver by the parties hereto in accordance herewith without notice or liability to any other person. In some instances, the representations and warranties in this Agreement may represent an allocation among the parties hereto of risks associated with particular matters regardless of the knowledge of any of the parties hereto. Consequently, persons other than the parties may not rely upon the representations and warranties in this Agreement as characterizations of actual facts or circumstances as of the date of this Agreement or as of any other date.

9.10Remedies; Specific Performance. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any and all remedies herein expressly conferred upon a party will be deemed cumulative with and not exclusive of any other

remedy expressly conferred hereby, and the exercise by a party of any one such remedy will not preclude the exercise of any other such remedy. The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur if any provision of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with the terms hereof and, accordingly, that the parties shall be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce specifically the performance of the terms and provisions hereof (including the parties’ obligation to consummate the Merger), in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. Each of the parties hereby further waives (a) any defense in any action for specific performance that a remedy at law would be adequate and (b) any requirement under any law to post security or a bond as a prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief.

9.11Severability. Whenever possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under Law, but if any provision or portion of any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any Law or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or portion of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement shall be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction such that the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion thereof shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

9.12Delivery by Facsimile or Electronic Transmission. This Agreement and any signed agreement or instrument entered into in connection with this Agreement, and any amendments or waivers hereto or thereto, to the extent signed and delivered by means of a facsimile machine or bye-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original agreement or instrument and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person. No party hereto shall (and each party hereto shall cause its Subsidiaries and Representatives not to) raise the use of a facsimile machine ore-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file to deliver a signature to this Agreement or any signed agreement or instrument entered into in connection with this Agreement, or any amendments or waivers hereto or thereto, or the fact that any signature or agreement or instrument was transmitted or communicated through the use of a facsimile machine ore-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file as a defense to the formation of a contract, and each party hereto forever waives any such defense.

[Signature Page Follows]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, the Bank and the Company have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above written.

OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP.

By:

/S/ CHRISTOPHER D. MAHER

Name:  Christopher D. Maher

Title:    Chairman, President & CEO

OCEANFIRST BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:

/s/ CHRISTOPHER D. MAHER

Name:  Christopher D. Maher

Title:    Chairman, President & CEO

CAPITAL BANK OF NEW JERSEY

By:

/s/ DAVID J. HANRAHAN

Name:  David J. Hanrahan

Title:    President and CEO

[Signature Page to Agreement and Plan of Merger]

ANNEX B

STATUTORY PROVISIONS RELATING TO DISSENTERS’ RIGHTS

New Jersey Statues

17:9A-148. “Applicable federal law” defined; merger, consolidation of banks, national banking associations

. . .

B. One or more banks may, without the approval of the commissioner or of any other officer, department, board or agency of this State, merge into or consolidate with a national banking association under the charter of such association, with the approval of the holders of at least 2/3 of the capital stock of each such bank entitled to vote. A majority of the directors of each such bank shall, within 10 days after such approval has been given, file in the department a certificate over their signatures that such approval has been given, and that the bank intends to act in pursuance thereof. Except as otherwise provided in subsection D. of this section, a merger or consolidation authorized by this subsection shall be effected solely in the manner and with the effect provided by applicable federal law, and no such merger or consolidation shall be subject to sections 132 through 147 of P.L.1948, c.67(C.17:9A-132 through17:9A-147) or to any other law of this State; but a copy of the agreement or merger or consolidation certified by the comptroller of the currency shall be evidence, and may be recorded, as provided by section 138 of P.L.1948, c.67(C.17:9A-138). Upon the taking effect of the merger or consolidation, the bank shall be deemed to have surrendered its charter.

United States Code

12 U.S. Code § 215a - Merger of national banks or State banks into national banks

. . .

(b) Dissenting shareholders

If a merger shall be voted for at the called meetings by the necessary majorities of the shareholders of each association or State bank participating in the plan of merger, and thereafter the merger shall be approved by the Comptroller, any shareholder of any association or State bank to be merged into the receiving association who has voted against such merger at the meeting of the association or bank of which he is a stockholder, or has given notice in writing at or prior to such meeting to the presiding officer that he dissents from the plan of merger, shall be entitled to receive the value of the shares so held by him when such merger shall be approved by the Comptroller upon written request made to the receiving association at any time before thirty days after the date of consummation of the merger, accompanied by the surrender of his stock certificates.

(c) Valuation of shares

The value of the shares of any dissenting shareholder shall be ascertained, as of the effective date of the merger, by an appraisal made by a committee of three persons, composed of (1) one selected by the vote of the holders of the majority of the stock, the owners of which are entitled to payment in cash; (2) one selected by the directors of the receiving association; and (3) one selected by the two so selected. The valuation agreed upon by any two of the three appraisers shall govern. If the value so fixed shall not be satisfactory to any dissenting shareholder who has requested payment, that shareholder may, within five days after being notified of the appraised value of his shares, appeal to the Comptroller, who shall cause a reappraisal to be made which shall be final and binding as to the value of the shares of the appellant.

(d) Application to shareholders of merging associations: appraisal by Comptroller; expenses of receiving association; sale and resale of shares; State appraisal and merger law

If, within ninety days from the date of consummation of the merger, for any reason one or more of the appraisers is not selected as herein provided, or the appraisers fail to determine the value of such shares, the Comptroller shall upon written request of any interested party cause an appraisal to be made which shall be final and binding on all parties. The expenses of the Comptroller in making the reappraisal or the appraisal, as the case may be, shall be paid by the receiving association. The value of the shares ascertained shall be promptly paid to the dissenting shareholders by the receiving association. The shares of stock of the receiving association which would have been delivered to such dissenting shareholders had they not requested payment shall be sold by the receiving association at an advertised public auction, and the receiving association shall have the right to purchase any of such shares at such public auction, if it is the highest bidder therefor, for the purpose of reselling such shares within thirty days thereafter to such person or persons and at such price not less than par as its board of directors by resolution may determine. If the shares are sold at public auction at a price greater than the amount paid to the dissenting shareholders, the excess in such sale price shall be paid to such dissenting shareholders. The appraisal of such shares of stock in any State bank shall be determined in the manner prescribed by the law of the State in such cases, rather than as provided in this section, if such provision is made in the State law; and no such merger shall be in contravention of the law of the State under which such bank is incorporated. The provisions of this subsection shall apply only to shareholders of (and stock owned by them in) a bank or association being merged into the receiving association.

ANNEX C

VOTING AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT

This VOTING AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT, dated as of October 25, 2018 (this

Agreement”), is by and among OceanFirst Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and the undersigned shareholder (the “Shareholder”) of the Company (as defined below). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings specified in the Merger Agreement (as defined below).

WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, Capital Bank of New Jersey, a New Jersey chartered commercial bank (the “Company”), Parent and OceanFirst Bank, National Association, a national banking association and a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent (the “Bank”), are entering into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, (i) the Company will merge with and into the Bank (the “Merger”), with the Bank as the surviving bank in the Merger and a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent, and (ii) at the Effective Time, the shares of common stock, par value $5.00 per share, of the Company (“CompanyCommon Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (excluding the Canceled Shares and Dissenting Shares) will, without any further action on the part of the holder thereof, be automatically converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration;

WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, the Shareholder is the record and beneficial owner of, has the sole right to dispose of, and has the sole right to vote the number ofsharesof Company Common Stock set forth below the Shareholder’s signature on the signature page hereto (such Company Common Stock, together with any other capital stock of the Company acquired by the Shareholder after the execution of this Agreement, whether acquired directly or indirectly, upon the exercise of options, conversion of convertible securities or otherwise, and any other securities issued by the Company that are entitled to vote on the approval the Merger Agreement held or acquired by the Shareholder (whether acquired heretofore or hereafter), being collectively referred to herein as the “Shares”; provided that the term “Shares” shall not include any securities beneficially owned by the Shareholder as a trustee or fiduciary);

WHEREAS, receiving the Requisite Company Vote is a condition to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and

WHEREAS, as an inducement to Parent to enter into the Merger Agreement and incur the obligations therein, Parent has required that the Shareholder enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

Section  1.     Agreement to Vote; Restrictions on Voting and Transfers.

  (a)    Agreement to Vote the Shares. The Shareholder hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that from the date hereof until the Expiration Time, at any meeting (whether annual or special and each adjourned or postponed meeting) of the Company’s shareholders, however called, the Shareholder will (i) appear at such meeting or otherwise cause all of the Shares to be counted as present thereat for purposes of establishing a quorum and (ii) vote or cause to be voted all of the Shares (A) in favor of the approval of the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (B) against any Acquisition Proposal, without regard to any recommendation to the shareholders of the Company by the Board of Directors of the Company concerning such Acquisition Proposal, and without regard to the terms of such Acquisition Proposal, or other proposal made in opposition to or that is otherwise in competition or inconsistent with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (C) against any agreement, amendment of any

agreement or organizational document (including the Company Certificate and the Company Bylaws), or any other action that is intended or would reasonably be expected to prevent, impede, or interfere with, delay, postpone or discourage the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or this Agreement and (D) against any action, agreement, transaction or proposal that would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant, agreement or other obligation of the Company in the Merger Agreement.

  (b)      Restrictions on Transfers. The Shareholder hereby agrees that, from the date hereof until the earlier of the receipt of the Requisite Company Vote or the Expiration Time, the Shareholder shall not, directly or indirectly, sell, offer to sell, give, pledge, grant a security interest in, encumber, assign, grant any option for the sale of or otherwise transfer or dispose of any Shares, or enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding to take any of the foregoing actions (each, a “Transfer”) other than any Transfer (i) by will or operation of Law as a result of the death of the Shareholder or (ii) by the Shareholder to any of the Shareholder’s affiliates (as defined in the Merger Agreement) (including trusts) and immediate family members for any bona fide estate and tax planning purposes;provided that as a condition to any such Transfer under clause (i) or clause (ii), such transferee shall execute a joinder to this Agreement. Any Transfer in violation of thisSection 1(b) shall be null and void. The Shareholder further agrees that the Company and/or Parent may notify the Company’s transfer agent that there is a stop transfer order with respect to all of the Shares and that this Agreement places limits on the voting and Transfer of the Shares.

  (c)      Transfer of Voting Rights. The Shareholder hereby agrees that the Shareholder shall not deposit any Shares in a voting trust, grant any proxy or power of attorney or enter into any voting agreement or similar agreement or arrangement in contravention of the obligations of the Shareholder under this Agreement with respect to any of the Shares.

  (d)      Acquired Shares. Any Shares or other voting securities of the Company with respect to which beneficial ownership is acquired by the Shareholder or any of the Shareholder’s affiliates, including, without limitation, by purchase, as a result of a stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, combination, reclassification, exchange or change of such Shares or upon exercise or conversion of any securities of the Company, if any, after the execution hereof (in each case, a “Share Acquisition”) shall automatically become subject to the terms of this Agreement and shall become “Shares” for all purposes hereof. If any affiliate of the Shareholder acquires Shares by way of a Share Acquisition, the Shareholder shall cause such affiliate to comply with the terms of this Agreement applicable to a “Shareholder” of the Company.

  (e)      No Inconsistent Agreements. The Shareholder hereby agrees that the Shareholder shall not enter into any agreement, contract, arrangement or understanding with any person (as defined in the Merger Agreement) prior to the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms that is in any way inconsistent with any of the terms of this Agreement.

Section  2.      Waiver of Dissenter’s Rights. The Shareholder hereby waives any appraisal or dissenter’s rights that the Shareholder may have under applicable Law with respect to the Merger.

Section  3.     Representations, Warranties and Support Covenants of the Shareholder.

  (a)      Representations and Warranties. The Shareholder represents and warrants to Parent as follows:

     (i)    Power and Authority; Consents. The Shareholder has the capacity to execute and deliver this Agreement. No filing with, and no permit, authorization, consent or approval of, any Governmental Entity is necessary on the part of the Shareholder for the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Shareholder or the consummation by the Shareholder of the transactions contemplated hereby.

     (ii)    Due Authorization. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Shareholder and the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Shareholder and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of the Shareholder.

     (iii)    Binding Agreement. Assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent, this Agreement constitutes the valid and binding agreement of the Shareholder, enforceable against the Shareholder in accordance with its terms (except in all cases as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, reorganization or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and the availability of equitable remedies).

     (iv)    Non-Contravention. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Shareholder does not, and the performance by the Shareholder of the Shareholder’s obligations hereunder and the consummation by the Shareholder of the transactions contemplated hereby will not, violate or conflict with, or constitute a default under, any agreement, instrument, contract or other obligation or any order, arbitration award, judgment or decree to which the Shareholder is a party or by which the Shareholder or the Shareholder’s property or assets is bound, or any Law to which the Shareholder or the Shareholder’s property or assets is subject. Except for this Agreement, the Shareholder is not, and no affiliate of the Shareholder is, a party to any voting agreement, voting trust or any other contract, agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to the voting, transfer or ownership of any Shares. The Shareholder has not appointed or granted a proxy or power of attorney to any person with respect to any Shares.

     (v)    Ownership of Shares. Except for restrictions in favor of Parent pursuant to this Agreement and transfer restrictions of general applicability as may be provided under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the “blue sky” laws of the various States of the United States, the Shareholder owns, beneficially and of record, all of the Shares free and clear of any proxy, voting restriction, adverse claim, security interest, or other Lien, and has sole voting power and sole power of disposition with respect to the Shares with no restrictions on the Shareholder’s rights of voting or disposition pertaining thereto, and no person other than the Shareholder has any right to direct or approve the voting or disposition of any of the Shares. As of the date hereof, the number of the Shares set forth below the Shareholder’s signature on the signature page hereto is true, complete and correct. The Shareholder has possession of an outstanding certificate or outstanding certificates representing all of the Shares (other than Shares held in book-entry form) and such certificate or certificates does not or do not contain any legend or restriction inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.

     (vi)    Legal Actions. There is no action, suit, investigation, complaint or other proceeding pending against the Shareholder or, to the knowledge of the Shareholder, any other person or, to the knowledge of the Shareholder, threatened against the Shareholder or any other person that restricts, prohibits or would delay (or, if successful, would reasonably be expected to restrict, prohibit or delay) the exercise by Parent of its rights under this Agreement or the performance by any party of its obligations under this Agreement.

     (vii)    Shareholder Claims. There exists no outstanding claim by or on behalf of the Shareholder against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and the Shareholder is not aware of any claim that the Shareholder may have against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, in each case, arising out of, relating to or in connection with any contract, agreement, arrangement or understanding to which the Shareholder is a party.

     (viii)    Reliance. The Shareholder understands and acknowledges that Parent is entering into the Merger Agreement in reliance upon the Shareholder’s execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the representations and warranties of the Shareholder contained herein.

  (b)      Support Covenants. From the date hereof until the Expiration Time, the Shareholder, in his or her capacity as a shareholder of the Company, hereby:

     (i)     agrees not to take any action that would (x) make any representation or warranty of the Shareholder contained herein untrue or incorrect or (y) have the effect of preventing, impeding, or, in any material respect, delaying, interfering with or adversely affecting the performance by the Shareholder of the Shareholder’s obligations under this Agreement or the exercise by Parent of its rights under this Agreement;

     (ii)     agrees to promptly notify Parent of the number of Shares, if any, acquired in any Share Acquisition by the Shareholder after the execution hereof; and

     (iii)     authorizes Parent and the Company to publish and disclose in any announcement or disclosure required by applicable Law or any periodic report or proxy or registration statement filed in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement the Shareholder’s identity and ownership of the Shares and the nature of the Shareholder’s obligations under this Agreement.

Section  4.     Further Assurances. From time to time, at the request of Parent and without further consideration, the Shareholder shall promptly execute and deliver such additional documents and take all such further action as may be necessary to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

Section  5.     Termination. This Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (a) the Effective Time and (b) the date of termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms (the “Expiration Time”);providedthat thisSection 5 andSection 6 shall survive the Expiration Time indefinitely;provided,further that no such termination or expiration shall relieve any party hereto from any liability for fraud or any breach of this Agreement occurring prior to such termination.

Section  6.     Miscellaneous.

  (a)       Expenses. All fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such fees, costs and expenses.

  (b)    Notices. All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if delivered personally, telecopied or emailed (with confirmation), mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) or delivered by an express courier (with confirmation) to the parties at the following addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like notice):

    (i)       If to Parent, to:

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

110 West Front Street

Red Bank, New Jersey 07701

Attention: Christopher D. Maher

Facsimile: (732)349-5070

Email: cmaher@oceanfirst.com

    with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Four Times Square

New York, New York 10036

Attention: David C. Ingles

Facsimile: (917)777-2697

Email: David.Ingles@skadden.com

    (ii)       If to the Shareholder, to the address of the Shareholder set forth below under the Shareholder’s signature on the signature pagespage hereto.

  (c)    Amendments, Waivers, Etc. This Agreement may not be amended, changed, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified or terminated except by an instrument in writing signed by each of the parties hereto.

  (d)    Successors and Assigns. No party hereto may assignNeither this Agreement nor any of itsthe rights, interests or delegateobligations hereunder shall be assigned by any of its obligations under this Agreementthe parties hereto (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other party hereto, except Parent may, without the consent of the Shareholder, assign any of Parent’sits rights and delegate any of Parent’sits obligations under this Agreement to any affiliate of Parent. Any purported assignment in contravention hereof shall be null and void. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shallwill be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and assigns, including without limitation any corporate successor by merger or otherwise. Notwithstanding any Transfer of shares of Company Common Stock consistent with this Agreement, the transferor shall remain liable for the performance of all obligations of transferor under this Agreement.permitted assigns.

  (e)    Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing expressed or referredThis Agreement is not intended to, in this Agreement will be construed to giveand does not, confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder, including the right to this Agreementrely upon the representations and their respective successors and permitted assigns, any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or with respect to this Agreement or any provision of this Agreement.warranties set forth herein.

  (f)    No Partnership, Agency, or Joint Venture. This Agreement is intended to create, and creates, a contractual relationship and is not intended to create, and does not create, any agency, partnership, “group” (as such term is used in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act), joint venture or any like relationship between the parties hereto.

  (g)    Entire Agreement. This Agreement embodiesconstitutes the entire agreement and understanding among the parties hereto relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, relatingboth written and oral, among the parties hereto with respect to suchthe subject matter.matter hereof.

  (h)    Severability. IfWhenever possible, each provision or portion of any termprovision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable Law, but if any provision or otherportion of any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or incapableunenforceable in any respect under any applicable Law in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or portion of being enforced by any rule or law, or public policy, all other termsprovision in such jurisdiction, and provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remainbe reformed, construed and enforced in full force and effect so long assuch jurisdiction such that the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any party hereto. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties heretounenforceable provision or portion thereof shall negotiate in good faithbe interpreted to modify this Agreementbe only so broad as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the end that the transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.is enforceable.

  (i)    Specific Performance; Remedies Cumulative. The parties hereto acknowledgeagree that money damages areirreparable damage would occur if any provision of this Agreement were not performed by the Shareholder in accordance with the terms hereof and, accordingly, that Parent shall be entitled to an adequate remedy forinjunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement that any breachor to enforce specifically the performance of this Agreement would cause irreparable harm to the non-breaching partyterms and that any party,provisions hereof, in addition to any other rights and remediesremedy to which the partiesParent may have hereunder orbe entitled at law or in equity, may,equity. The Shareholder hereby further waives (i) any defense in its sole discretion, apply to a court of competent jurisdictionany action for specific performance or injunction or such other relief as such court may deem just and proper in order to enforce this Agreement or prevent any violation hereof and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, each party waives any objection to the imposition of such relief. All rights, powers and remedies provided under this Agreement or otherwise available in respect hereofthat a remedy at law would be adequate and (ii) any requirement under any law to post security or in equity shall be cumulative and not alternative, and the exercise or beginning of the exercise of any such right, power or remedy by any party shall not preclude the simultaneous or later exercise of any other such rights, powers or remedies by such party.a bond as a prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief.

  (j)    No Waiver. The failure of any party hereto to exercise any right, power or remedy provided under this Agreement or otherwise available in respect hereof at law or in equity, or to insist upon compliance by anythe other party hereto with its obligations hereunder, and any custom or practice of the parties at variance with the terms hereof, shall not constitute a waiver by such party of its right to exercise any such or other right, power or remedy or to demand such compliance.

  (k)    Governing Law. This Agreement and all disputes or controversies arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to any applicable conflicts of law principles.

  (l)    Submission to Jurisdiction. The partiesEach party hereto agreeagrees that it will bring any suit, action or proceeding brought by either party to enforcein respect of any provision of, or based on any matterclaim arising out of or in connection with,related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby shall be broughtexclusively in any federal or state court locatedsitting in the State of Delaware. Each of the parties hereto submits to the jurisdiction of any such court in any suit, action or proceeding seeking to enforce any provision of, or based on any matter arising out of, orNew Jersey (the “Chosen Courts”), and, solely in connection with claims arising under this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, and herebythat are the subject of this Agreement, (i) irrevocably waives the benefit of jurisdiction derived from present or future domicile or otherwise in such action or proceeding. Each party hereto irrevocably waives,submits to the fullest extent permitted by law,exclusive jurisdiction of the Chosen Courts, (ii) waives any objection that it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the

venue ofin any such suit, action or proceeding in the Chosen Courts, (iii) waives any objection that the Chosen Courts are an inconvenient forum or do not have jurisdiction over any party and (iv) agrees that service of process upon such party in any such court or that any such suit, action or proceeding broughtwill be effective if notice is given in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum.accordance withSection 6(b).

  (m)    Waiver of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY HERETO INTENTIONALLY, KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY THAT MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE EACH SUCH PARTY HEREBY KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY AND VOLUNTARILY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AT THE TIME OF INSTITUTION OF THE APPLICABLE LITIGATION, ANY RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT (A)THAT: (I) NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER, (B)(II) EACH PARTY UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (III) EACH PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER VOLUNTARILY AND (C)(IV) EACH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION.SECTION 6(m).

  (n)    Drafting and Representation. The parties hereto have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. NoIn the event that an ambiguity or a question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties, and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement will be interpreted for or against any party because that party or its legal representative drafted the provision.Agreement.

  (o)    Name, Captions, Gender. Section headings of this Agreement are for reference purposes only and are to be given no effectshall not affect in any way the constructionmeaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the context may require, any pronoun used herein shall include the corresponding masculine, feminine or neuter forms.

  (p)    Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile or other electronic means and in any number of counterparts, eachall of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which togetherconsidered one and the same agreement and shall constitute one instrument. Each counterpart may consist of a number of copies eachbecome effective when counterparts have been signed by less than all, but together signed by all,each of the parties hereto.and delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart.

[Signature Pages Follow]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date and year first written above.

 

OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP.

By:

 

 

 

Name:

 

Title:

[Signature Page to Voting Agreement]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date and year first written above.

[SHAREHOLDER]SHAREHOLDER:

By:[●]

 

 

Name:

Title:

Number of shares of Company Common

Stock:

 

 

Address:

 

 

 

 

[Signature Page to Voting and Support Agreement]


Annex CANNEX D

July 12, 2016

LOGO

October 25, 2018

Board of Directors

Ocean Shore Holding Co.Capital Bank of New Jersey

1001 Asbury Avenue175 South Main Road

Ocean City,Vineland, NJ 0822608360

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Ocean Shore Holding Co. (“Company”), OceanFirst Financial Corp. (“Parent”) and Masters Merger Sub Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which (i) Merger Sub will, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, merge with and into Company with Company being the surviving corporation, and (ii) immediately thereafter, Company will merge with and into Parent with Parent being the surviving corporation (collectively, the “Merger”). Pursuant to the termsMembers of the Agreement, at the Effective Time of the Merger, each share of Company common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (“Company Common Stock”), except for certain shares specified in the Agreement, shall be converted into the right to receive, without interest, (a) $4.35 in cash and (b) 0.9667 shares of Parent common stock, par value $0.01 per share (collectively, the “Merger Consideration”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. The other terms and conditions of the Merger are more fully set forth in the Agreement. Board:

You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of shares of issued and outstanding common stock, $5.00 par value (the “Company Common Shares”), of Capital Bank of New Jersey (“Capital”), of the Merger Consideration (as defined below) to be received by such holders in the holdersproposed merger (the “Proposed Merger”) of Company Common Stock.

Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.Capital with and into, OceanFirst Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst Financial Corp (“Sandler O’Neill,” “we” or “our”OceanFirst”), as part of its investment banking business, is regularly engagedset forth in the valuationAgreement and Plan of financial institutionsMerger dated October 25, 2018 (the “Merger Agreement”). As detailed in the Merger Agreement, pursuant to the Proposed Merger, each Company Common Share issued and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions. outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Proposed Merger will be converted into the right to receive 1.25 shares of OceanFirst common stock, $0.01 par value (collectively, the “Merger Consideration”).

In connection with thisarriving at our opinion, we have, reviewed and considered, among other things: (i) reviewed the Agreement; (ii) certain publicly available financial statements and other historical financial informationperformance, current financial position and general prospects of Company that we deemed relevant; (iii)each of Capital and OceanFirst and reviewed certain publicly availableinternal financial statementsanalyses and other historical financial information of Parent that we deemed relevant; (iv) the Company’s budget for the year ending December 31, 2016 and publicly available consensus mean analyst earnings per share estimates for Company for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, as well as an estimated internal projected earnings growth rate for the years thereafter, as discussed with the senior management of Company; (v) publicly available consensus mean analyst earnings per share estimates for Parent for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 as well as an estimated internal projected earnings growth rate for the years thereafter, as discussed with and confirmedforecasts prepared by the seniorrespective management teams of Parent; (vi)Capital and OceanFirst, (ii) reviewed a draft of the Merger Agreement dated October 25, 2018 (the most recent draft made available to us), (iii) reviewed and analyzed the stock performance and trading history of Capital and OceanFirst, (iv) studied and analyzed the consolidated financial and operating data of Capital and OceanFirst, (v) reviewed the pro forma financial impact of the Proposed Merger on ParentOceanFirst, based on certain assumptions relating to transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments, cost savings and a core deposit intangible asset, as well as financial projections for Company forother synergies determined by the years ending December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2020, as provided byrespective management teams of Capital and discussed with the senior management of Parent; (vii) the publicly reported historical price and trading activity for Company and Parent common stock, including a comparison of certain stock market information for Company and Parent common stock and certain stock indices as well as publicly available information for certain other similar companies, the securities of which are publicly traded; (viii) a comparison of certain financial information for Company and Parent with similar banks and thrifts for which information is publicly available; (ix)OceanFirst, (vi) considered the financial terms of certain recentthe Proposed Merger as compared with the financial terms of comparable bank and bank holding company mergers and business combinations in the bank and thrift industry (on a regional and national basis), to the extent publicly available; (x) the current market environment generally and the banking environment in particular; and (xi) such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria as we considered relevant. We also discussedacquisitions, (vii) met and/or communicated with certain members of theeach of Capital’s and OceanFirst’s senior management to discuss their respective operations, historical financial statements and future prospects, and (viii) conducted such other financial analyses, studies and investigations as we deemed appropriate.

Our opinion is given in reliance on information and representations made or given by Capital and OceanFirst, and their respective officers, directors, auditors, counsel and other agents, and on filings, releases and other information issued by each of CompanyCapital and OceanFirst, including financial statements, financial projections and stock price data, as well as certain other information from recognized independent sources. We have not independently verified the business, financial condition, results of operationsinformation or data concerning Capital or OceanFirst nor any other data we considered in our review and, prospects of Company and held similar discussions with certain membersfor purposes of the senior management of Parent regarding the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Parent.

In performing our review,opinion set forth below, we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and data. We have assumed that all forecasts and projections provided to us have been reasonably prepared and reflect the best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of the respective

4 Tower Bridge • 200 Barr Harbor Drive • West Conshohocken • PA    19428-2979

phone(610)832-1212fax (610)832-5301www.boenninginc.comMember FINRA/SIPC

D- 1


LOGO

Board of Directors

Capital Bank of New Jersey

October 25, 2018

Page 2

management teams of Capital and OceanFirst as to their most likely future financial performance. We express no opinion as to any financial projections or the assumptions on which they are based. We have not conducted any valuation or appraisal of any assets, collateral securing such assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Capital or OceanFirst, nor have any such valuations or appraisals been provided to us. We express no opinion as to the collectability of any assets. Additionally, we assume that the Proposed Merger is, in all respects, lawful under applicable law.

With respect to anticipated transaction costs, purchase accounting adjustments, expected cost savings and other synergies and financial and other information that was availablerelating to the general prospects of Capital and reviewed by us from public sources, that was provided to us by


Company or Parent, or their respective representatives, or that was otherwise reviewed by us andOceanFirst, we have assumed that such accuracyinformation has been reasonably prepared and completeness for purposesreflects the best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of rendering this opinion without any independent verification or investigation.the respective management teams of Capital and OceanFirst as to their most likely future performance. We have further relied on the assurances of the respective managementsmanagement teams of CompanyCapital and ParentOceanFirst that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make any of such information inaccurate or misleading. We have not been asked to and have not undertaken an independent verification of any of such information and we do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness thereof. We didhave assumed that the allowance for loan losses indicated on the balance sheet of each of Capital and OceanFirst is adequate to cover such losses; we have not make an independent evaluationreviewed loans or perform an appraisalcredit files of the specific assets, the collateral securing assetsCapital or the liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Company or Parent, or any of their respective subsidiaries, nor have we been furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. We renderOceanFirst and express no opinion or evaluation on the collectability of any assets oras to the future performance of any loans of CompanyCapital or Parent. We did not make an independent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses of Company or Parent, or the combined entity after the Merger, and we have not reviewed any individual credit files relating to Company or Parent. We have assumed, with your consent, that the respective allowances for loan losses for both Company and Parent are adequate to cover such losses and will be adequate on a pro forma basis for the combined entity.

In preparing its analyses, Sandler O’Neill used publicly available consensus mean analyst earnings per share estimates for Company for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 as well as an estimated internal projected earnings growth rate for the years thereafter, as discussed with the senior management of Company, as well as publicly available consensus mean analyst earnings per share estimates for Parent for the years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 as well as an estimated internal projected earnings growth rate for the years thereafter, as discussed with and confirmed by the senior management of Parent. Sandler O’Neill also received and used in its pro forma analyses certain assumptions relating to transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments, cost savings and a core deposit intangible asset, as well as financial projections for Company for the years ending December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2020, as provided by and discussed with the senior management of Parent. With respect to the foregoing information, the respective managements of Company and Parent confirmed to us that such information reflected (or, in the case of the publicly available mean analyst earnings per share estimates referred to above, were consistent with) the best currently available projections, estimates and judgments of those respective senior managements of the future financial performance of Company and Parent and we assumed that such performance would be achieved. We express no opinion as to such projections, estimates or judgments, or the assumptions on which they are based. We have also assumed that there has been no material change in Company’s or Parent’s assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since the date of the most recent financial statements made available to us. We have assumed in all respects material to our analysis that Company and Parent will remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to our analyses.

In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed, with your consent, that (i) each of the parties to the Agreement will comply in all material respects with all material terms and conditions of the Agreement and all related agreements, that all of the representations and warranties contained in such agreements are true and correct in all material respects, that each of the parties to such agreements will perform in all material respects all of the covenants and other obligations required to be performed by such party under such agreements and that the conditions precedent in such agreements are not and will not be waived, (ii) in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases with respect to the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on Company, Parent or the Merger or any related transaction, (iii) the Merger and any related transactions will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement without any waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement thereof and in compliance with all applicable laws and other requirements, (iv) the Merger will be consummated without Company’s rights under Section 8.1(g) of the Agreement having been triggered, and (v) the Merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. Finally, with your consent, we have relied upon the advice that Company has received from its legal, accounting and tax advisors as to all legal, accounting and tax matters relating to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Agreement.

Page C-2


Our analyses and opinion are necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. Events occurring after the date hereof could materially affect this opinion. We have not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw this opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date hereof. We express no opinion as to the trading values of Company Common Stock or Parent common stock at any time or what the value of Parent common stock will be once it is actually received by the holders of Company Common Stock.

We have acted as Company’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger and will receive a fee for our services, which fee is contingent upon consummation of the Merger. We will also receive a fee for rendering this opinion. The Company has also agreed to indemnify us against certain claims and liabilities arising out of our engagement and to reimburse us for certain of our out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with our engagement. As we have previously advised you, in the two years preceding the date of this opinion, (i) we have provided certain investment banking services to Parent and received fees for such services, and (ii) Sandler O’Neill Mortgage Finance L.P., an affiliate of Sandler O’Neill, has acted as introducing broker to Parent and has received fees for such services, and we and our affiliates may provide to Parent, and receive compensation for, such services in the future, including during the pendency of the Merger. In the ordinary course of our business as a broker-dealer, we may purchase securities from and sell securities to Company, Parent and their respective affiliates. We may also actively trade the equity and debt securities of Company and Parent or their respective affiliates for our own account and for the accounts of our customers.

This letter is directed to the Board of Directors of Company in connection with its consideration of the Agreement and Merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of Company as to how any such shareholder should vote at any meeting of shareholders called to consider and vote upon the Merger. Our opinion is directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Merger Consideration to the holders of Company Common Stock and does not address the underlying business decision of Company to engage in the Merger, the form or structure of the Merger and/or other transactions contemplated in the Agreement, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any other alternative transactions or business strategies that might exist for Company, or the effect of any other transaction in which Company might engage. We also do not express any opinion as to the amount or nature of the compensation to be received in or as a result of the Merger, and/or other transactions contemplated by the Agreement, if any, by any Company or Parent officer, director or employee, or any class of such persons, if any, relative to the amount of compensation to be received by any other shareholder. This opinion has been approved by Sandler O’Neill’s fairness opinion committee. This opinion shall not be reproduced without Sandler O’Neill’s prior written consent;provided,however, Sandler O’Neill will provide its consent for the opinion to be included in regulatory filings to be completed in connection with the Merger.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair to the holders of Company Common Stock from a financial point of view.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.

Page C-3


Annex D

LOGO

265 Franklin Street, Suite 710 Boston, MA 02110

Tel: 617 654-0700 | Fax: 617 654-0710

Piper Jaffray & Co Since 1895 Member SIPC and NYSE

July 12, 2016

Board of Directors

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

975 Hooper Avenue

Toms River, NJ 08753

Members of the Board:

You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to OceanFirst Financial Corp. (the “Company”) of the Merger Consideration (as defined below) to be paid by the Company for the outstanding shares of common stock of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the “Target”), par value $0.01, (the “Target Common Stock”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) to be entered into by and among the Company, Masters Merger Sub Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and the Target. The Agreement provides for, among other things, (i) the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Target, with the Target surviving (the “First-Step Merger”) and (ii) immediately thereafter, the merger (collectively with the First-Step Merger, the “Merger”) of the Target with and into the Company, with the Company surviving. Upon the effective time of the Merger, each share of the Target Common Stock, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, except for certain shares of Target Common Stock as specified in the Agreement, shall be converted into the right to receive (a) $4.35 in cash (the “Cash Consideration”), and (b) 0.9667 shares of Company common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Stock Consideration” and together with the Cash Consideration, the “Merger Consideration”). Cash will be paid in lieu of any fractional shares. The terms and conditions of the Merger arc more fully set forth in the Agreement. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this letter have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

Piper Jaffray & Co., as part of its investment banking business, is regularly engaged in the valuation of financial institutions and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions. In arriving at our opinion, we have: (i) reviewed and analyzed the financial terms of a draft of the Agreement dated July 11, 2016; (ii) reviewed and analyzed certain financial and other data with respect to the Company and the Target that was publicly available or made available to us by the Company and by the Target; (iii) reviewed and analyzed certain forward-looking information relating to the Company and the Target that was publicly available, as well as that was furnished to us by the Company and the Target, including forecasts prepared or reviewed by the Company of the Company’s and Target’s expected operating results on a stand-alone basis; (iv) reviewed and analyzed materials detailing the Merger prepared by the Company, the Target and their affiliates and by their respective legal and accounting advisors, including the estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and related expenses and purchase accounting adjustments expected to result from the Merger (the “Synergies”); (v) conducted discussions with members of senior management and representatives of the Company and the Target concerning the matters described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above, as well as their respective businesses and prospects before and after giving effect to the Merger and the Synergies; (vi) reviewed the current and historical reported prices and trading activity of Company common stock and Target Common Stock and similar information for certain other publicly traded companies deemed by us to be comparable to the Company and the Target; (vii) compared the financial performance of the Company and the Target with that of certain other publicly traded companies that we deemed relevant; (viii) performed certain financial analyses for the Company and the Target on a pro forma combined basis giving effect to the Merger reflecting certain assumptions relating to the Synergies; (ix) analyzed the Merger Consideration relative to the Target’s tangible book value, core deposits (deposits less all jumbo time deposits), last twelve months earnings as of March 31, 2016, projected earnings for the year ending 2016 and 2017 and projected earnings for the year ending 2017 assuming the cost savings to be achieved have been fully phased in


Confidential

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

July 12, 2016

Page D-2 of D-4

as you project; (x) considered the current market environment generally and the depository banking environment in particular; and (xi) reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of certain business combination transactions in the depository banking industry that we deemed relevant. In addition, we have conducted such other analyses, examinations and inquiries and considered such other financial, economic and market criteria as we have deemed necessary in arriving at our opinion.

In arriving at our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed, without assuming liability or responsibility for independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly available or was furnished, or otherwise made available, to us or discussed with or reviewed by us. We have further relied upon the assurances of the management of the Company and the Target that the financial information provided has been prepared on a reasonable basis in accordance with industry practice, and that they are not aware of any information or facts that would make any information provided to us incomplete or misleading. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, for the purpose of this opinion, we have assumed that with respect to financial forecasts, estimates and other forward-looking information (including the Synergies) reviewed by us, that such information has been reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company and the Target as to the expected future results of operations and financial condition of the Company and the Target, respectively, to which such financial forecasts, estimates and other forward-looking information (including the Synergies) relate and we have assumed that such results would be achieved. We express no opinion as to any such financial forecasts, estimates or forward-looking information (including the Synergies) or the assumptions on which they were based. We have further assumed that the Merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes. We express no opinion as to any of the legal, accounting and tax matters relating to the Merger and any other transactions contemplated in connection therewith and have relied, with your consent, on advice of the outside legal counsel and the independent accountants to the Company, and on the assumptions of the management of the Company and the Target, as to all accounting, legal, tax and financial reporting matters with respect to the Company, the Target and the Agreement.

In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed that the executed Agreement will be in all material respects identical to the last draft reviewed by us. We have relied upon and assumed, with your consent, without independent verification, that (i) the representations and warranties of all parties to the Agreement and all other related documents and instruments that are referred to therein are true and correct, (ii) each party to such agreements will fully and timely perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by such party, (iii) the Merger will be consummated pursuant to the terms of the Agreement without amendments thereto and (iv) all conditions to the consummation of the Merger will be satisfied without waiver by any party of any conditions or obligations thereunder. Additionally, we have assumed that all the necessary regulatory approvals and consents required for the Merger will be obtained in a manner that will not adversely affect the Company, the Target or the contemplated benefits of the Merger.

In arriving at our opinion, we have not performed any appraisals or valuations of any specific assets or liabilities (fixed, contingent, derivative, off-balance sheet, or other) of the Company or the Target, and have not been furnished or provided with any such appraisals or valuations, nor have we evaluated the solvency of the Company or the Target under any state or federal law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. Accordingly, we express no opinion regarding the liquidation value of the Company, the Target or any other entity.OceanFirst. We have assumed that there has been no material change in the respective assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of the CompanyCapital or the TargetOceanFirst since the date of the most recent financial datastatements made available to us. We have also assumed that the final terms of the transaction reflected in all respectsthe definitive form of Merger Agreement do not differ in any respect material to our analysis thatanalyses from the Company and the Target would remain as a going concern for all periods relevant to our analysis. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,draft version we have not: (i) conducted a review of any individual credit files of the Company or the Target, nor have we evaluated the adequacy of the loan or lease reserves of the Company or the


Confidential

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

July 12, 2016

Page D-3 of D-4

Target, (ii) conducted a review of any credit mark that may be takenreviewed in connection with the Merger, nor have we evaluated the adequacy of any contemplated credit mark to be so taken, or (iii) conducted a review of the collectability of any asset or the future performance of any loan of the Company or the Target.rendering our opinion. We have assumed with your consent,that all of the representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement and all related agreements are true and correct, that each party under the Merger Agreement and all related agreements will perform all of the covenants required to be performed by such party under such agreements, and that the respective allowancesconditions precedent in such agreements will not be modified or waived. We have assumed that the Proposed Merger will qualify as atax-free reorganization for loan and lease lossesfederal income tax purposes. Also, in rendering our opinion, we have assumed that in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for the Company andconsummation of the Target, and the credit mark are adequate to cover such losses andProposed Merger, no conditions will be adequateimposed that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on a pro forma basis for the Company. Accordingly, we express no opinion with respect to the foregoing. Again, without limiting the generalitycombined entity or contemplated benefits of the foregoing, we have undertaken no independent analysis of any pending or threatened litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities,Proposed Merger, including the cost savings and related expenses expected to whichresult from the Company or the TargetProposed Merger.

Our opinion is a party or may be subject, and at the direction of the Company and with your consent, our opinion makes no assumption concerning, and therefore does not consider, the possible assertion of claims, outcomes or damages arising out of any such matters. We have also assumed that neither the Company nor the Target is partybased upon information provided to any material pending transaction, including without limitation any financing, recapitalization, acquisition or merger, divestiture or spin-off, other than the Merger and the merger of the principal banking subsidiaries of the Company and Target contemplatedus by the Agreement.

No company or transaction used in any analysis for purposesrespective management teams of comparison is identical to the Company, the Target or the Merger. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of the comparisons is not solely mathematical; rather, it involves complex considerationsCapital and judgments about differences in the companies and transactions to which the Company, the Target and the Merger were comparedOceanFirst, as well as market, economic, financial and other factors that could affect the public trading value or transaction value of the companies.

This opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions and upon the information available to us and facts and circumstances as they exist and are subject to evaluation oncan be evaluated only as of the date hereof.hereof and accordingly, it speaks to no other period. Events occurring after the date hereof could materially affect the assumptions used in preparing thisour opinion. We are not expressing any opinion herein as to the price at which shares of the Company’s common stock or the Target Common Stock may trade following announcement of the Merger or at any future time. We have not undertaken to reaffirm or revise this opinion or otherwise comment upon anyon events occurring after the date hereof and do not have anyan obligation to update, revise or reaffirm thisour opinion. Our opinion does not address the relative merits of the Proposed Merger or the other business strategies or transactions that Capital’s Board of Directors has considered or may be considering, nor does it address the underlying business decision of Capital’s Board of Directors to proceed with the Proposed Merger. We are expressing no opinion as to the prices at which OceanFirst’s securities may trade at any time. Nothing in our opinion is to be construed as constituting tax advice or a recommendation to take any particular tax position, nor does our opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which we understand that OceanFirst has obtained such advice as it deemed necessary from qualified professionals. Our opinion is for the information of Capital’s Board of Directors

We have been engaged by

LOGO

Board of Directors

Capital Bank of New Jersey

October 25, 2018

Page 3

in connection with its evaluation of the CompanyProposed Merger and does not constitute a recommendation to act as its financial advisorthe Board of Directors of Capital in connection with the Proposed Merger and we will receiveor a transaction fee fromrecommendation to any shareholder of Capital as to how such shareholder should vote or act with respect to the Company for providing our services,Proposed Merger. This opinion should not be construed as creating any fiduciary duty on Boenning & Scattergood, Inc.’s part to any party or person. Our opinion is not to be quoted or referred to, in whole or in part, in a significant portion of which is contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. We will also receive a fee for renderingregistration statement, prospectus, proxy statement or in any other document, nor shall this opinion whichbe used for any other purpose, without our prior written consent, except that, if required by applicable law, this opinion fee willmay be creditedreferenced and included in full towardsits entirety in any filing made by OceanFirst in respect to the transaction fee becoming payableProposed Merger with the Securities and Exchange Commission; provided, however, any description of or reference to our opinion or to Boenning & Scattergood, Inc. be in a form reasonably acceptable to us upon closingand our counsel. We shall have no responsibility for the form or content of any such disclosure, other than the Merger. Our opinion feeitself.

Boenning & Scattergood, Inc., as part of its investment banking business, regularly is not contingent uponengaged in the consummationvaluation of the Merger or the conclusions reached in our opinion. The Company has also agreed to indemnify us against certain liabilitiesassets, securities and reimburse us for certain expensescompanies in connection with our services. The Piper Jaffray investment banking ream that advisedvarious types of transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, private placements, public offerings and valuations for various other purposes, and in the Companydetermination of adequate consideration in connection with the Merger also advised the Company (while at a prior firm) in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Colonial American Bank, which acquisition closed in July 2015.such transactions. In addition, in the ordinary course of our business as a broker-dealer, we may, from time to time, purchase securities from, and our affiliatessell securities to, OceanFirst, Capital, and/or their respective affiliates. In the ordinary course of business, we may also actively trade the securities of the Company and the TargetOceanFirst for our own account and/or for the accountaccounts of our customers and accordingly may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

We may also, in the future, provide investment banking andare acting as Capital’s financial advisory services to the Company or entities that are affiliated with the Company, for which we would expect to receive compensation.

Consistent with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, Piper Jaffray has adopted policies and procedures to establish and maintain the independence of its Research Department and personnel. As a result, Piper Jaffray’s research analysts may hold opinions, make statements or recommendations, and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and the Merger and other participants in the Merger that differ from the views of Piper Jaffray’s investment banking personnel.


Confidential

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

July 12, 2016

Page D-4 of D-4

This opinion is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with its consideration of the Merger and is not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of the Company as to how such stockholder should act or vote with respect to the Merger or any other matter. Except with respect to the use of this opinionadvisor in connection with the proxy statement relating toProposed Merger and will receive a fee for our services, a significant portion of which is contingent upon consummation of the Merger in accordance with our engagement letter with the Company,Proposed Merger. We will also receive a fee for rendering this opinion. Our fee for rendering this opinion shallis not contingent upon any conclusion that we may reach or upon completion of the Proposed Merger. Capital has also agreed to indemnify us against certain liabilities that may arise out of our engagement.

Boenning & Scattergood Inc. has not had any material relationship with OceanFirst during the past two years in which compensation was received or was intended to be disclosed, referredreceived. Boenning & Scattergood, Inc. has provided no investment banking services to publishedCapital during the past two years in which compensation was received or otherwise used (in whole was intended to be received. Boenning & Scattergood, Inc. may provide services to OceanFirst in the future (and/or in part)to Capital if the Proposed Merger is not consummated), although as of the date of this opinion, there is no agreement to do so nor shall any public references to us be made, without our prior written approval. mutual understanding that such services are contemplated.

This opinion has been approved for issuance by the Piper Jaffray Opinion Committee.

ThisBoenning & Scattergood, Inc.’s fairness opinion addresses solelycommittee. We do not express any opinion as to the fairness from a financial point of view, to the Company of the proposed Merger Consideration set forth in the Agreement and does not address any other terms or agreement relating to the Merger or any other terms of the Agreement. We were not requested to opine as to, and this opinion does not address: (i) the basic business decision to proceed with or effect the Merger; (ii) the merits of the Merger relative to any alternative transaction or business strategy that may be available to the Company; (iii) any other terms contemplated by the Agreement; or (iv) the fairness of the Merger to, or any consideration received in connection therewith by, any creditor or other constituency of the Company. Furthermore, we express no opinion with respect to the amount or nature of the compensation to be paidreceived in the Proposed Merger toby any officer, directorof the officers, directors, or employeeemployees of any party to the Merger Agreement, or any class of such persons, relative to the Merger Considerationcompensation to be paid to any other shareholderreceived by the holders of Company Common Shares in the Merger or with respect to the fairnessProposed Merger.

LOGO

Board of any such compensation, including whether such payments arc reasonable in the contextDirectors

Capital Bank of the Merger.New Jersey

October 25, 2018

Page 4

Based uponon and subject to the foregoing, and based upon such other factors as we consider relevant, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be received by the holders of Company Common Shares pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Company as of the date hereof.such holders.

Sincerely,

/s/ Piper Jaffray

LOGO

Boenning & Co.Scattergood, Inc.

PIPER JAFFRAY & CO.


PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation contains a provision which, subject to certain exceptions described below, eliminates the liability of a director or an officer to OceanFirst or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of duty as a director or officer.

OceanFirst’s certificate of incorporation provides that OceanFirst shall indemnify, to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL, all directors, officers, employees, agents of OceanFirst, and any person who, at OceanFirst’s request, is or was serving as director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expense, liability and loss and expenses in any proceeding arising out of their status or activities in any of the foregoing capacities except when the party’s activities do not meet the applicable standard of conduct set forth in the DGCL.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to OceanFirst’s directors, officers and controlling persons under the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, OceanFirst has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Item 21. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Description

 

Description
2.1  Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 12, 2016,October 25, 2018, by and among OceanFirst Financial Corp., Masters Merger Sub Corp.OceanFirst Bank, National Association, and Ocean Shore Holding Co.Capital Bank of New Jersey (attached asAnnex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus)registration statement)†
3.1  Certificate of Incorporation of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of OceanFirst’s registration statement on FormS-1, FileNo. 033-80123, effective May 13, 1996, as amended) (P)
3.2Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1A of OceanFirst’s Current Report on Form8-K, filed on June 4, 2018)
3.3  Bylaws of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of OceanFirst’s Current Report on Form8-K, filed on January 23, 2015)
3.4Amendment to Bylaws of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of OceanFirst’s Current Report on Form8-K, filed on June 30, 2017)
4.1  Form of Common Stock Certificate of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.0 of OceanFirst’s registration statement on FormS-1, FileNo. 033-80123, effective May 13, 1996, as amended) (P)
5.1  Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP*LLP
8.1  Form of Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP regarding certain tax matters†matters
8.2  Form of Opinion of Kilpatrick TownsendStevens & Stockton LLPLee regarding certain tax matters†matters
10.1  Form of Voting and Support Agreement by and between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and certainthe directors of Ocean Shore Holding Co.Capital Bank in their capacity as Capital Bank stockholders (attached asAnnex BC to this jointthe proxy statement/prospectus)prospectus contained in this registration statement)
21  Subsidiaries of OceanFirst Financial Corp.*

II-1


23.1  Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)*
23.2  Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1)
23.3  Consent of Kilpatrick TownsendStevens & Stockton LLPLee (included in Exhibit 8.2)
23.4  Consent of KPMG LLP (with respect to OceanFirst Financial Corp.)
23.5  Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (with respect to Ocean Shore Holding Co.)†
23.6Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP (with respect to CapeSun Bancorp, Inc.)


Description
24.1  Power of Attorney*Attorney (included on this signature page to this registration statement)
99.1  Consent of Sandler O’NeillBoenning & Partners, L.P.†Scattergood, Inc.
99.2  Consent of Piper Jaffray & Co.†
99.3Consent of Steven E. Brady (as a proposed director of OceanFirst Financial Corp.)*
99.4Form of proxy card of Ocean Shore Holding Co.†
99.5FormCapital Bank of proxy card of OceanFirst Financial Corp.†New Jersey

 

Filed Herewith
*Filed Previously

Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of RegulationS-K. OceanFirst agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted attachment to the Securities and Exchange Commission on a confidential basis upon request.

Item 22. Undertakings.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

 

1.

To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement: (i) to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; (ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement (notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement); and (iii) to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.

 

2.

That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initialbona fide offering thereof.

 

3.

To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

 

4.

That, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d)15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in this registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initialbona fide offering thereof.

 

5.

That prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the registrant undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other items of the applicable form.

 

II-2


6.

That every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (5) above, or (ii) that purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until such amendment has become effective, and that for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initialbona fide offering thereof.


7.

To respond to requests for information that is incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of this Form, within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration statement through the date of responding to the request.

 

8.

To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in this registration statement when it became effective.

 

9.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer, or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

II-3


EXHIBITS INDEX

Description

2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 25, 2018, by and among OceanFirst Financial Corp., OceanFirst Bank,  National Association, and Capital Bank of New Jersey (attached as Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus contained in this registration statement)†
3.1Certificate of Incorporation of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of OceanFirst’s registration statement on FormS-1, FileNo. 033-80123, effective May 13, 1996, as amended) (P)
3.2Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1A of OceanFirst’s Current Report on Form8-K, filed on June 4, 2018)
3.3Bylaws of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of OceanFirst’s Current Report on Form8-K, filed on January 23, 2015)
3.4Amendment to Bylaws of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of OceanFirst’s Current Report on Form8-K, filed on June 30, 2017)
4.1Form of Common Stock Certificate of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.0 of OceanFirst’s registration statement on FormS-1, FileNo. 033-80123, effective May 13, 1996, as amended) (P)
5.1Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
8.1Form of Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP regarding certain tax matters
8.2Form of Opinion of Stevens & Lee regarding certain tax matters
10.1Form of Voting and Support Agreement by and between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and the directors of Capital Bank in their capacity as Capital Bank stockholders (attached asAnnex  C to the proxy statement/prospectus contained in this registration statement)
21Subsidiaries of OceanFirst Financial Corp.
23.1Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)
23.2Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1)
23.3Consent of Stevens & Lee (included in Exhibit 8.2)
23.4Consent of KPMG LLP (with respect to OceanFirst Financial Corp.)
23.5Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (with respect to Sun Bancorp, Inc.)
24.1Power of Attorney (included on this signature page to this registration statement)
99.1Consent of Boenning & Scattergood, Inc.
99.2Form of proxy card of Capital Bank of New Jersey

Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of RegulationS-K. OceanFirst agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted attachment to the Securities and Exchange Commission on a confidential basis upon request.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 2 to the registration statement on FormS-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Toms River,Red Bank, State of New Jersey, on October 17, 2016.December 6, 2018.

 

OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP.

By:

 

            /s/ Christopher D. Maher

 

Name:

Title:

Christopher D. Maher

Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of OceanFirst Financial Corp. hereby severally constitute and appoint Christopher D. Maher and Steven J. Tsimbinos, and each of them, his or her true and lawfulattorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, severally, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this registration statement, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto saidattorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that saidattorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities indicated and on the date of this registration statement.

 

Signatures

  

Title

  

Date

/s/ *Christopher D. Maher

Christopher D. Maher

  

President, and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive OfficerOfficer) and Director)Director

(Chairman of the Board)

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *Michael J. Fitzpatrick

Michael J. Fitzpatrick

  

Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer (Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *Angela K. Ho

John R. GarbarinoAngela K. Ho

  

Chairman of the Board of DirectorsSenior Vice President and Principal

Accounting Officer

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *Steven E. Brady

Joseph J. BurkeSteven E. Brady

  

Director

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *John E. Walsh

Angelo CataniaJohn E. Walsh

  

Director

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *Angelo Catania

Michael DevlinAngelo Catania

  

Director

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *Anthony R. Coscia

Jack M. FarrisAnthony R. Coscia

DirectorDecember 6, 2018


Signatures

  

DirectorTitle

  October 17, 2016

Date

/s/ *Michael D. Devlin

Donald E. McLaughlinMichael D. Devlin

  

Director

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *Jack M. Farris

Diane F. RhineJack M. Farris

  

Director

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *Kimberly M. Guadagno

Mark G. SolowKimberly M. Guadagno

  

Director

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ *John K. Lloyd

John E. WalshK. Lloyd

  

Director

  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018

/s/ Christopher D. MaherDiane F. Rhine

Christopher D. MaherDiane F. Rhine

  

Attorney-in-Fact

Director
  October 17, 2016December 6, 2018


EXHIBIT INDEX

Description

/s/ Mark G. Solow

Mark G. Solow

  DirectorDecember 6, 2018
  2.1

/s/ Grace C. Torres

Grace C. Torres

  Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 12, 2016, by and among OceanFirst Financial Corp., Masters Merger Sub Corp. and Ocean Shore Holding Co. (attached asAnnex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus)DirectorDecember 6, 2018
  3.1

/s/ Samuel R. Young

Samuel R. Young

  Certificate of Incorporation of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of OceanFirst’s registration statement on Form S-1, File No. 033-80123, effective May 13, 1996, as amended)
  3.2Director  Bylaws of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of OceanFirst’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2015)
  4.1Form of Common Stock Certificate of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.0 of OceanFirst’s registration statement on Form S-1, File No. 033-80123, effective May 13, 1996 as amended)
  5.1Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP*
  8.1Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP regarding certain tax matters†
  8.2Opinion of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP regarding certain tax matters†
10.1Form of Voting Agreement by and between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and certain directors of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (attached asAnnex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus)
21Subsidiaries of OceanFirst Financial Corp.*
23.1Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)*
23.2Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1)†
23.3Consent of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP (included in Exhibit 8.2)†
23.4Consent of KPMG LLP (with respect to OceanFirst Financial Corp.)†
23.5Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (with respect to Ocean Shore Holding Co.)†
23.6Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP (with respect to Cape Bancorp, Inc.)†
24.1Power of Attorney*
99.1Consent of Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.†
99.2Consent of Piper Jaffray & Co.†
99.3Consent of Steven E. Brady (as a proposed director of OceanFirst Financial Corp.)*
99.4Form of proxy card of Ocean Shore Holding Co.†
99.5Form of proxy card of OceanFirst Financial Corp.†December 6, 2018

Filed Herewith
*Filed Previously