Table of Contents
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |||
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |||
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |||
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |||
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12 | |||
WILLIAM LYON HOMES | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant) | ||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
| ||||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
| ||||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
| ||||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
| ||||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
| ||||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
| ||||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
| ||||
(3) | Filing Party:
| |||
| ||||
(4) | Date Filed:
| |||
|
Table of Contents
April 10, 2018
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation, to be held on Thursday, May 24, 2018, 10:00 a.m. local time, at our principal executive offices located at 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660.
At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to: (i) elect seven (7) directors to serve for the ensuing year, (ii) vote on an advisory basis to approve our executive compensation(“say-on-pay vote”), (iii) ratify the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm, and (iv) transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement describe these matters. We urge you to read this information carefully.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote: FOR each of the seven (7) nominees for director named in the proxy statement, FOR the advisorysay-on-pay vote, and FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, and regardless of the number of shares of William Lyon Homes stock you own, it is important that your shares are represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. You may vote on the Internet or telephone as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or, if you are receiving a paper copy of the proxy materials, complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible. This action will not prevent you from voting your shares in person if you subsequently choose to attend the Annual Meeting.
We thank you for your support and participation.
Very Truly Yours,
William H. Lyon |
Matthew R. Zaist | |
Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Newport Beach, California
April 10, 2018
Table of Contents
WILLIAM LYON HOMES
4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS — THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
The 2018 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held on Thursday, May 24, 2018, 10:00 a.m. local time, at our principal executive offices located at 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660. We will consider and act on the following items of business at the Annual Meeting:
1. | The election of the seven (7) directors named in this proxy statement to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The nominees for election to the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) are (in alphabetical order): Douglas K. Ammerman, Thomas F. Harrison, Gary H. Hunt, William H. Lyon, Matthew R. Niemann, Lynn Carlson Schell and Matthew R. Zaist. |
2. | Advisory(non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executiveofficers (“say-on-pay vote”). |
3. | Ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018. |
4. | Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. |
The proxy statement accompanying this notice describes each of these items of business in detail. The Board recommends a vote: FOR each of the seven (7) nominees for director named in the proxy statement, FOR the advisorysay-on-pay vote, and FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Only holders of record of the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B common stock at the close of business on March 29, 2018 are entitled to notice of, to attend, and to vote at the Annual Meeting. A list of stockholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection, for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting, at the principal executive office of the Company during regular business hours for a period of no less than ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.
The Company is pleased to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders on the Internet. This process allows the Company to provide its stockholders with Annual Meeting information in a timely manner, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials.
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. To ensure that your vote is counted at the Annual Meeting, however, please vote as promptly as possible.
By Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
Jason R. Liljestrom |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
Newport Beach, California
April 10, 2018
Table of Contents
Page | ||||
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
5 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
9 | ||||
10 | ||||
10 | ||||
10 | ||||
11 | ||||
12 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
14 | ||||
15 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
PROPOSAL 2 ADVISORY VOTE ON APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 17 | |||
17 | ||||
17 | ||||
19 | ||||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS | 20 | |||
24 | ||||
24 | ||||
36 | ||||
38 | ||||
39 | ||||
44 | ||||
44 | ||||
44 |
i
Table of Contents
Page | ||||
45 | ||||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
49 | ||||
49 | ||||
PROPOSAL 3 RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC | 50 | |||
50 | ||||
50 | ||||
50 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
52 | ||||
54 | ||||
54 | ||||
54 | ||||
54 | ||||
APPENDIX A: RECONCILIATION OF GAAP ANDNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES | A-1 |
ii
Table of Contents
PROXY STATEMENT
INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION
Your proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (as used herein, the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), for use at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday, May 24, 2018, 10:00 a.m. local time, at our principal executive offices located at 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660, or at any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof, for the purposes discussed in this proxy statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and any business properly brought before the Annual Meeting. Proxies are solicited to give all stockholders of record an opportunity to vote on matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. Directions to attend the Annual Meeting may be found on our website atwww.lyonhomes.com. References to our website in this Proxy Statement are not intended to function as hyperlinks and the information contained on our website is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement.
We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to most of our stockholders of record, and paper copies of the proxy materials to certain other stockholders of record. Brokers and other nominees who hold shares on behalf of beneficial owners will be sending their own similar Notice. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to request a printed copy by mail or electronically may be found on the Notice and on the website referred to in the Notice, including an option to request paper copies on an ongoing basis. On April 10, 2018, we intend to make this proxy statement available on the Internet and to commence mailing of the Notice to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. We intend to mail this proxy statement, together with a proxy card, to those stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting who have properly requested paper copies of such materials, within three business days of such request.
Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2018 Annual Meeting
Our proxy statement and 2017 Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com. This website address contains the following documents: the Notice of the Annual Meeting, the proxy statement and proxy card sample, and the 2017 Annual Report. You are encouraged to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.
Who Can Vote, Outstanding Shares
Record holders of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock as of the close of business on March 29, 2018, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on all matters to be voted upon. As of the Record Date, there were 34,454,130 shares of our Class A common stock issued and outstanding, including an aggregate of 1,251,921 unvested shares of restricted stock, each entitled to one vote, and there were 4,817,394 shares of our Class B common stock outstanding, each entitled to five votes.
You may vote by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person or you may vote by submitting a proxy. The method of voting by proxy differs (1) depending on whether you are viewing this proxy statement on the Internet or receiving a paper copy and (2) for shares held as a record holder and shares held in “street name.” If you hold your shares of common stock as a record holder and you are viewing this proxy statement on the Internet, you may vote by submitting a proxy over the Internet by following the instructions on the website referred to in the Notice previously mailed to you. If you hold your shares of common stock as a record holder and you are reviewing a paper copy of this proxy statement, you may vote your shares by completing, dating and
1
Table of Contents
signing the proxy card that was included with the proxy statement and promptly returning it in the preaddressed, postage paid envelope provided to you, or by submitting a proxy over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you hold your shares of common stock in street name, which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or nominee, you will receive a Notice from your broker, bank or other nominee that includes instructions on how to vote your shares. Your broker, bank or nominee will allow you to deliver your voting instructions over the Internet and may also permit you to vote by telephone. In addition, you may request paper copies of the proxy statement and proxy card from your broker by following the instructions on the Notice provided by your broker.
The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 23, 2018. If you vote through the Internet, you should be aware that you may incur costs to access the Internet, such as usage charges from telephone companies or Internet service providers and that these costs must be borne by you. If you vote by Internet or telephone, then you need not return a written proxy card by mail.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. You should submit your proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. If you properly give your proxy and submit it to us in time to vote, one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares as you have directed.
All shares entitled to vote and represented by properly submitted proxies (including those submitted electronically, telephonically and in writing) received before the polls are closed at the Annual Meeting, and not revoked or superseded, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated on those proxies. If no direction is indicated on a proxy, your shares will be voted as follows: FOR each of the seven (7) nominees for director named in the proxy statement, FOR the advisorysay-on-pay vote, and FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. The proxy gives each of Matthew R. Zaist and Colin T. Severn discretionary authority to vote your shares in accordance with his best judgment with respect to all additional matters that might come before the Annual Meeting.
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting by taking any of the following actions:
• | delivering to our corporate secretary a signed written notice of revocation, bearing a date later than the date of the proxy, stating that the proxy is revoked; |
• | signing and delivering a new paper proxy, relating to the same shares and bearing a later date than the original proxy; |
• | submitting another proxy by telephone or over the Internet (your latest telephone or Internet voting instructions are followed); or |
• | attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person, although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy. |
Written notices of revocation and other communications with respect to the revocation of Company proxies should be addressed to:
William Lyon Homes
4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Corporate Secretary
If your shares are held in “street name,” you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. You must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to do so. See below regarding how to vote in person if your shares are held in street name.
2
Table of Contents
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held in “street name,” which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must bring to the Annual Meeting a legal proxy from the record holder of the shares, which is the broker or other nominee, authorizing you to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Stockholders who wish to attend the Annual Meeting will be required to present verification of ownership of our common stock, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement, and will be required to present a valid government-issued picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, to gain admittance to the Annual Meeting. No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.
The inspector of elections appointed for the Annual Meeting will tabulate votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting. The inspector of elections will also determine whether a quorum is present. In order to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting, a majority in voting power of all of the shares of the stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Shares that abstain from voting on any proposal, or that are represented by brokernon-votes (as discussed below), will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.
Brokers or other nominees who hold shares of common stock in “street name” for a beneficial owner of those shares typically have the authority to vote in their discretion on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, brokers are not allowed to exercise their voting discretion with respect to the election of directors or for the approval of other matters which the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) determines to be“non-routine,” without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. Thesenon-voted shares are referred to as “brokernon-votes.” If your broker holds your common stock in “street name,” your broker will vote your shares on“non-routine” proposals only if you provide instructions on how to vote by filling out the voter instruction form sent to you by your broker with this proxy statement. Only Proposal No. 3 (ratifying the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm) is considered a routine matter. Proposal Nos. 1 (election of directors) and 2(say-on-pay vote) are not considered routine matters, and without your instruction, your broker cannot vote your shares. In addition, pursuant to our bylaws, abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted as a vote cast “for” or “against” any proposal.
Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors. A plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting is required for the election of directors. Accordingly, the seven (7) director nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted either for or against this proposal and, therefore, will not have any effect on the outcome of the election of directors.
Proposal No. 2: AdvisorySay-on-Pay Vote. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required for approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted either for or against this proposal and, therefore, will not have any effect on the outcome of thesay-on-pay vote.
Proposal No. 3: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required for the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions will not be
3
Table of Contents
counted either for or against this proposal. Brokers generally have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm, thus brokernon-votes are generally not expected to result from the vote on Proposal No. 3.
Our Board is soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting from our stockholders. We will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by delivery of the Notice or proxy statement by mail, we will request that brokers, banks and other nominees that hold shares of our common stock, which are beneficially owned by our stockholders, send Notices, proxies and proxy materials to those beneficial owners and secure those beneficial owners’ voting instructions. We will reimburse those record holders for their reasonable expenses. We do not intend to hire a proxy solicitor to assist in the solicitation of proxies. We may use several of our regular employees, who will not be specially compensated, to solicit proxies from our stockholders, either personally or by telephone, Internet, facsimile or special delivery letter.
A list of stockholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection, for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting, at the principal executive office of the Company during regular business hours for a period of no less than ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.
This proxy statement contains “forward-looking statements” (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements are based on our current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the statements. The forward-looking statements may include statements regarding actions to be taken by us. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect our business, particularly those mentioned in the risk factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and in our periodic reports on Form10-Q and our current reports onForm 8-K.
4
Table of Contents
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Pursuant to the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), and the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “bylaws”), the total number of directors constituting the Board shall be fixed exclusively by the Board. The Company currently has eight directors serving on the Board. Based upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”), the Board has resolved that the number of directors constituting the entire Board be decreased from eight to seven effective as of the Annual Meeting, and has nominated each of the Company’s current directors for election at the Annual Meeting, as set forth below, with the exception of Michael Barr, who will continue to serve as a director until his current term expires as of the Annual Meeting. Mr. Barr was initially appointed to our Board on November 7, 2012 to fill a new Board seat created in connection with the investment of affiliates of Paulson & Co., Inc. (“Paulson”) in the Company, which such affiliates sold their entire shareholdings in the Company in an underwritten secondary offering that closed in September 2017. The Nominating Committee and Board’s decision not to nominate Mr. Barr for an additional term at the upcoming Annual Meeting was not the result of any dispute or disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the operations, policies or practices of the Company. Each nominee listed below has consented to serve for a new term, and each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve aone-year term until the Company’s next annual meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. At the Annual Meeting, proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of individuals than the seven nominees named in this proxy statement.
The Board and the Nominating Committee believe the skills, qualities, attributes and experience of the directors provide the Company with business acumen and a diverse range of perspectives to engage each other and management to address effectively the Company’s evolving needs and represent the best interests of the Company’s stockholders.
Name | Age | Position | ||||
William H. Lyon | 44 | Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman | ||||
Matthew R. Zaist | 43 | President and Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||
Douglas K. Ammerman(a, c) | 66 | Director | ||||
Thomas F. Harrison(b, c) | 64 | Director | ||||
Gary H. Hunt(c) | 69 | Director | ||||
Matthew R. Niemann(a, b) | 54 | Director | ||||
Lynn Carlson Schell(a, b) | 57 | Director |
(a) | Member of the Audit Committee |
(b) | Member of the Compensation Committee |
(c) | Member of the Nominating Committee |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE SEVEN NAMED DIRECTOR NOMINEES.
Vacancies on the Board, including any vacancy created by an increase in the size of the Board, may be filled only by a majority of the directors remaining in office, even though less than a quorum of the Board, or a sole remaining director, and not by stockholders. A director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until such director’s successor is elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier retirement, resignation, disqualification, removal or death.
5
Table of Contents
If any nominee should become unavailable for election prior to the Annual Meeting, an event that currently is not anticipated by the Board, the proxies will be voted in favor of the election of a substitute nominee or nominees proposed by the Board or the number of directors may be reduced accordingly. Each nominee has agreed to serve if elected and the Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.
Information About Director Nominees
Set forth below is biographical information for each nominee and a summary of the specific qualifications, attributes, skills and experiences which led the Board to conclude that each nominee should serve on the Board at this time.
William H. Lyon, Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board, served as Chief Executive Officer for William Lyon Homes from March 2013 through July 2015, and asCo-Chief Executive Officer from July 2015 to March 2016, at which time he transitioned into the current role of Executive Chairman. Prior to being elected Chairman of the Board effective in March 2016, Mr. Lyon had also served as Vice Chairman of the Board since July 2015, and has been a member of our Board since January 25, 2000. William H. Lyon worked full time with the former William Lyon Homes from November 1997 through November 1999 as an assistant project manager and has been employed by the Company since November 1999. Since joining the Company as an assistant project manager, Mr. Lyon has served as a Project Manager, the Director of Corporate Development (beginning in 2002), the Director of Corporate Affairs (from February 2003 to February 2005), Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer (from February 2005 to March 2007), Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer (from March 2007 to March 2009), and President and Chief Operating Officer (March 2009 to March 2013). Mr. Lyon also actively served as the President of William Lyon Financial Services from June 2008 to April 2009. Mr. Lyon is a member of the Board of Directors of Commercial Bank of California and Pretend City Children’s Museum in Irvine, CA and an honorary member of The Bowers Museum in Santa Ana, CA. Mr. Lyon holds a dual B.S. in Industrial Engineering and Product Design from Stanford University.
With over 18 years of service with our Company, Mr. Lyon brings to our Board significant executive and real estate development and homebuilding industry experience, and serves as a bridge between management and the Board in his roles as Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman.
Matthew R. Zaist, President and Chief Executive Officer, joined the Company in 2000, and was promoted to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer effective March 22, 2016. On August 10, 2016, Mr. Zaist was appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company to serve as a member of the Board, and has served as a member of the Board since such date. Since joining the Company, Mr. Zaist has served in a number of corporate operational roles, including President andCo-Chief Executive Officer from July 2015 to March 2016, President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2013 to July 2015, Executive Vice President from January 2010 to March 2013 and previously, Corporate Vice President — Business Development & Operations from April 2009 to January 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Zaist served as Project Manager and Director of Land Acquisition for the Company’s Southern California Region. In his previous role as Executive Vice President, Mr. Zaist oversaw and managed the Company’s restructuring efforts and successful recapitalization, and as President and Chief Operating Officer managed and oversaw the Company’s initial public offering in 2013 in addition to being responsible for the overall management of the Company’s operations. Mr. Zaist is a member of the Executive Committee for the University of Southern California’s Lusk Center for Real Estate. Prior to joining William Lyon Homes, Mr. Zaist was a principal with American Management Systems (now CGI) in their State & Local Government practice. Mr. Zaist holds a B.S. from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York.
With over 17 years of service with our Company in a variety of operational and executive roles, Mr. Zaist brings to our Board anin-depth understanding of the Company’s business model and operations, and significant capital markets and corporate finance experience, in additional to serving as a further bridge between management and the Board in his roles as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board.
6
Table of Contents
Douglas K. Ammerman was appointed to the board of directors on February 27, 2007. Mr. Ammerman’s business career includes almost three decades of service with KPMG, independent public accountants, until retirement in 2002. He was the Managing Partner of the Orange County office and was a National Partner in Charge — Tax. He is a certified public accountant (inactive). In addition to his service as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, Mr. Ammerman currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of three publicly traded companies. From 2005 to the present, Mr. Ammerman has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Fidelity National Financial (a company listed on the New York Stock Exchange), where he also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. From 2011 to the present, Mr. Ammerman has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Stantec Inc. (a company listed on the NYSE), where he currently serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. From late 2015 to the present, Mr. Ammerman has served as a member of J. Alexander’s Holdings, Inc. (a company listed on the NYSE), where he serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee. In addition, during the past five years, Mr. Ammerman had served as a member of the Board of Directors of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (a company listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market) until March 29, 2017, where he served as Chairman of the Audit Committee and Remy International, Inc. (a company listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market) until 2015, where he served as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Ammerman has served as a director of The Pacific Club for thirteen years and is a past president. He also has served as a director of the UCI Foundation for fifteen years. Mr. Ammerman holds a B.A. in Accounting from California State University, Fullerton, and a master’s degree in Business Taxation from University of Southern California.
With nearly three decades of accounting experience, as well as significant executive and board experience, Mr. Ammerman provides our board of directors with operational, financial and strategic planning insights. Mr. Ammerman developed his finance and accounting expertise while holding positions such as Managing Partner and National Partner at KPMG. With this experience, Mr. Ammerman possesses the financial acumen requisite to serve as our Audit Committee Financial Expert and provides the board with valuable insight into finance and accounting related matters.
Thomas F. Harrison was appointed to our Board effective January 1, 2016. Mr. Harrison is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of Harvest Capital Partners, LLC, where he has served since March 31, 2018. Prior to such date, Mr. Harrison served as a Managing Director and Head of Global Development of Colony NorthStar, Inc., formerly Colony Capital, Inc., where he served since 1992 and up to the completion of its merger with NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc. and NorthStar Realty Finance Corp., to create Colony NorthStar, Inc., effective January 2017. As Managing Directorof Colony NorthStar, Inc., and having been a principal of Colony Capital, Inc. for over 19 years, he has demonstrated a strong record of executive leadership and success in opportunistic real estate private equity investing, business planning, investment analysis, underwriting and origination, asset and portfolio management, and business development. At Colony NorthStar, Mr. Harrison was active in sourcing, structuring and providing capital for value add and development transactions and responsible for management oversight of the firm’s worldwide real estate value-added and development portfolio. Prior to joining Colony Capital in 1992, Mr. Harrison was Executive Vice President of WSGP Partners, where he was responsible for real estate acquisitions from the RTC and other financial institutions. Previous to WSGP, he held senior positions with three prominent national development companies where he was responsible for the development collectively of over $1.5 billion of real estate projects and the acquisition of over $250 million of income-producing properties and residential land. Mr. Harrison holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), as well as a Master of Architecture degree from UCLA.
With decades of experience in real estate investment and finance, Mr. Harrison brings to our Board additional perspective and a breadth and depth of experience in the commercial and residential real estate industry.
Gary H. Hunt joined our Board on October 17, 2005 with over 30 years of experience in real estate. He spent 25 years with The Irvine Company, one of the nation’s largest master planning and land development organizations, serving 10 years as its Executive Vice President and member of its Board of Directors and Executive Committee. Mr. Hunt led the company’s major entitlement, regional infrastructure, planning, legal and strategic government relations, as well as media and community relations activities.
7
Table of Contents
As a founding Partner in 2001 and now the Vice Chairman of California Strategies, LLC, Mr. Hunt serves as a Senior Advisor to some of the largest master-planned community and real estate developers in the Western United States. Mr. Hunt also works or has worked with major national financial institutions and regional banks to manage projects through the real estate macro-economic restructuringand re-entitlement period. Since May 2016, Mr. Hunt has served on the board of Five Point Holdings, LLC, a publicly traded company listed on the NYSE (“FPH”). In addition, Mr. Hunt serves on the boards of several private companies including Glenair Corporation, University of California, Irvine Foundation and Psomas Engineering Company. He formerly was Chairman of the Board of CT Realty, and lead independent director of Grubb & Ellis Corporation and for sixteen months served as interim President and CEO.
Through his extensive experience in the real estate industry, Mr. Hunt brings additional perspective and provides the Board with outstanding strategic, corporate governance, political and business insight.
Matthew R. Niemann was appointed to our Board on February 25, 2012. Mr. Niemann is a Managing Director and senior member of Houlihan Lokey Capital’s Restructuring Group and previously was the Global Head of the Real Estate Investment Banking Group. He first joined Houlihan in 1999. Before rejoining Houlihan in 2008, Mr. Niemann spent three years with Cerberus Capital and served as senior managing director and chief strategic officer of GMAC ResCap (a Cerberus portfolio company) in charge of strategy for its $5.0 billion portfolio of builder and developer real estate investments. Mr. Niemann has been involved as a principal or advisor in a wide range of M&A, financing, restructuring and real estate transactions throughout his career, and is a frequent speaker and regularly testifies as an expert in these areas. Earlier in his career, Mr. Niemann was with PricewaterhouseCoopers and practiced law for several years in the Corporate, Banking & Real Estate practice of Bryan Cave in St. Louis. Mr. Niemann holds a law and finance degree from St. Louis University. He was a guest lecturer at the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University in Chicago, a member of the Ph.D. Dissertation Committee at Webster University, and has also served on the Board of Directors and Executive Committee (Treasurer) of the Ronald McDonald Houses of Greater St. Louis.
With extensive experience as an attorney, financial advisor and investment principal, Mr. Niemann brings to our Board demonstrated leadership skills and expertise in capital markets, real estate investment and finance.
Lynn Carlson Schell was appointed to our Board on February 25, 2012. Ms. Carlson Schell currently serves as the Managing Principal and Chief Executive Officer of Shelter Corporation and The Waters Senior Living, directing the firm’s strategy and long-term growth. Since founding Shelter Corporation, Ms. Carlson Schell has developed or acquired multi-family and senior housing consisting of over 16,500 units and comprising $1.2 billion in real estate. Ms. Carlson Schell led her firm’s diversification into senior living in 1999 and has since launched The Waters, a branded senior living experience in partnership with the University of Minnesota. In 2015, the Minneapolis St. Paul Business Journal named Shelter Corporation the fifth largest female owned business in Minnesota, also naming Ms. Carlson Schell an industry leader. Prior to founding Shelter Corporation, Ms. Carlson Schell spent nine years working as an associate and senior developer withCan-American Corporation. She was responsible for residential, condominium and apartment developments in the Midwest and Florida. Ms. Carlson Schell holds a B.A. in Economics from Mount Holyoke College.
With over thirty years of real estate and executive experience, Ms. Carlson Schell provides our Board with operational, financial and strategic planning insights.
On December 19, 2011, the Company and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to seek approval of a Prepackaged Joint Plan of Reorganization. At that time, Messrs. Lyon and Zaist each served as an executive officer of the Company and continued to serve as such after emerging from bankruptcy on February 25, 2012.
8
Table of Contents
The following sets forth information regarding the current executive officers of the Company. Biographical information pertaining to William H. Lyon and Matthew R. Zaist, who are both directors and executive officers of the Company, may be found in the section above entitled “Information About Director Nominees.”
Name | Age | Position | ||||
William H. Lyon | 44 | Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman | ||||
Matthew R. Zaist | 43 | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Brian W. Doyle | 54 | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||
Colin T. Severn | 47 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | 35 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
Brian W. Doyle, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, joined the Company in 1999 when it acquired substantially all of the assets of the former William Lyon Homes, where Mr. Doyle had served as Director of Sales and Marketing for the Southern California Division since November 1997. Prior to his current position, the majority of Mr. Doyle’s 19 year tenure with the company (and its predecessor) has been in operational leadership roles including as Division Manager of the San Diego Division, Division President of the Southern California Division, and as the Regional President of California beginning in 2010. Mr. Doyle was promoted to Executive Vice President and California Regional President effective July 2015, and transitioned to the corporate position of Executive Vice President of Operations in July 2016, serving in such role until March 31, 2017, when he was further promoted to his current position of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Doyle holds a B.A. from California State University of Long Beach, and possesses more than 26 years of experience in the real estate development and homebuilding industry.
Colin T. Severn, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, joined the Company in December 2003, and served in the role of Financial Controller until April 3, 2009. From April 3, 2009, Mr. Severn served as Vice President, Corporate Controller and Corporate Secretary until his promotion to Chief Financial Officer by approval of our Board on August 11, 2009. Mr. Severn continued to serve as the Company’s Corporate Secretary until November 2013, and was promoted from Vice President to Senior Vice President in 2015. Mr. Severn is a CPA (inactive) and has more than 19 years of experience in real estate accounting and finance, including positions with an international accounting firm, and other real estate and homebuilding companies. Mr. Severn holds a B.A. in Business Administration with concentrations in Accounting and Finance from California State University, Fullerton.
Jason R. Liljestrom, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, joined the Company in October 2013, and served in the role of Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary until his promotion to Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary effective February 17, 2017. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Liljestrom worked with the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP from 2007 to 2013 where he served as corporate counsel to a variety of public and private companies, and where his practice focused on mergers and acquisitions, capital markets transactions, securities matters and general corporate advice. Mr. Liljestrom holds a B.A. from Princeton University, a J.D. from the University of California Hastings College of the Law and is admitted to practice by the State Bar of California.
On December 19, 2011, the Company and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to seek approval of a Prepackaged Joint Plan of Reorganization. At that time, the officers listed above, with the exception of Mr. Liljestrom, served as executive officers of the Company and continued to serve as such immediately after emerging from bankruptcy on February 25, 2012.
9
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines covering, among other things, the duties and responsibilities of and independence standards applicable to our directors and Board committee structures and responsibilities. These guidelines are available on the “Governance” section of our website athttp://investors.lyonhomes.com/. In addition, a printed copy of the guidelines is available free of charge to any stockholder who requests a copy by sending a written request to: Corporate Secretary, William Lyon Homes, 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660.
Our Board currently consists of eight directors, five of whom were initially appointed pursuant to the Company’s prepackaged joint plan of reorganization in February 2012 (the “Plan”), one of whom was initially appointed to fill a newly created Board seat in connection with a privately negotiated stock issuance that took place in October 2012 (the “Paulson Subscription Agreement”), one of whom was appointed effective in January 2016 to fill a vacancy and one of whom was appointed effective August 10, 2016 to fill an additional vacancy. Each of the directors was duly elected by the stockholders of the Company most recently at the 2017 annual meeting held on May 23, 2017. Seven of the current directors are nominated for election at the Annual Meeting as described above, and will hold office until the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.
On May 15, 2013, certain funds and accounts managed by Luxor Capital Group, LP (the “Luxor Investor”), WLH Recovery Acquisition LLC (the “Paulson Investor”), and Lyon Shareholder 2012, LLC (“Lyon LLC”), entered into a stockholders agreement pursuant to which the Luxor Investor, Paulson Investor and Lyon LLC agreed to vote their shares at any annual or special meeting of the Company’s stockholders to elect up to a certain number of people to serve on our Board as proposed by the other investors, subject to certain sunset provisions based on then current ownership levels of such investors and subject to other terms and conditions as set forth in the agreement. We refer to such agreement herein as the “Stockholders Agreement,” and the Company is not party to the Stockholders Agreement. Based on filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the Record Date, the Company believes that the Stockholders Agreement has terminated and is of no further force or effect by reason of the Luxor Investor and the Paulson Investor ceasing to own a minimum number of shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company as provided in the Stockholders Agreement.
Other than as provided for in the Plan, the Paulson Subscription Agreement or the Stockholders Agreement, we are not aware of any understandings between the directors or any other persons pursuant to which such individuals were elected as directors or are to be selected as a director or nominee in the future.
Pursuant to the Certificate of Incorporation and the bylaws, the total number of directors constituting our Board shall be fixed exclusively by the Board. Until the date on which shares of our Class B common stock are no longer outstanding (the “Triggering Date”), all directors will be elected, appointed and removed by all common stockholders voting as a single class, with each share of Class A common stock having one vote and each share of Class B common stock having five votes. Until the Triggering Date, each of the members of our Board will be elected at an annual meeting of the stockholders and hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders, and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, removal or disqualification.
The Certificate of Incorporation provides further that on the Triggering Date, our Board will be divided into three classes to be comprised of the directors in office, as determined by the directors in office, with each class serving for a staggered three-year term. From the Triggering Date, Class I directors will serve an initialone-year term expiring at the first annual meeting of stockholders following the Triggering Date. Class II directors will serve an initialtwo-year term expiring at the second annual meeting of stockholders following the Triggering Date. Class III directors will serve an initial three-year term expiring at the third annual meeting of stockholders
10
Table of Contents
following the Triggering Date. Upon the expiration of the initial term of each class of directors, the directors in that class will be eligible to be elected for a new three-year term. Our directors will hold office until their successors have been elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal. After our Board is classified as described in the foregoing, no director may be removed except for cause and only with the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% in voting power of all the then-outstanding shares of stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class.
Subject to the special rights of any series of preferred stock to elect directors, vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled only by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director, and not by stockholders, and the directors so chosen will hold office until the next annual or special meeting of stockholders called for that purpose and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal.
The Board seeks to ensure that the Board is composed of members whose particular experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, when taken together, will allow the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively. New directors are approved by the Board after recommendation by the Nominating Committee. In identifying candidates for director, the Nominating Committee and the Board take into account (1) the comments and recommendations of Board members regarding the qualifications and effectiveness of the existing Board, or additional qualifications that may be required when selecting new Board members, (2) the requisite expertise and sufficiently diverse backgrounds of the Board’s overall membership composition, (3) the independence of outside directors and other possible conflicts of interest of existing and potential members of the Board, (4) personal and professional integrity, ethics and values, and (5) all other factors it considers appropriate.
When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Nominating Committee and the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the directors’ individual biographies set forth above. Although diversity may be a consideration in the selection of directors, the Company and the Board do not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. The Board has established a retirement age of 75. A director is expected to retire from the Board on the day of the annual meeting of stockholders following his or her 75th birthday.
The Nominating Committee will consider stockholder recommendations of candidates on the same basis as it considers all other candidates. Stockholders may propose director nominees by adhering to the advance notice procedures described in the section entitled “Other Matters — Stockholder Proposals and Nominations” in this proxy statement, and must include all information as required under our Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws, and any other information that would be required to solicit a proxy under federal securities law. We may request from the recommending stockholder or recommending stockholder group such other information as may reasonably be required to determine whether each person recommended by a stockholder or stockholder group as a nominee meets the minimum director qualifications established by our Board and is independent based on applicable laws and regulations. The Nominating Committee may also establish procedures, from time to time, regarding submission of candidates by stockholders and others.
Our corporate governance guidelines permits the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer to be filled by the same or different individuals. Effective as of March 22, 2016, William H. Lyon assumed the role of Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman, succeeding his father General William Lyon who continued to serve as a member of the board until his voluntary resignation on February 17, 2017. Also effective as of March 22, 2016, Matthew R. Zaist was promoted to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer. On August 10, 2016, Mr. Zaist was appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company to
11
Table of Contents
serve as a member of the Board, and has served as a member of the Board since such date. Our Board has determined the current structure of the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer being filled by different individuals to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders at this time.
Furthermore, Mr. Hunt serves as our lead independent director, and has served in such role since May 2012. As the Board’s lead independent director, Mr. Hunt holds a critical role in assuring effective corporate governance and in managing the affairs of our Board. Among other responsibilities, Mr. Hunt:
• | presides over executive sessions of our Board and over Board meetings when the Chairman of the Board is not in attendance; |
• | consults with the Chairman of the Board and other Board members on corporate governance practices and policies, and assumes the primary leadership role in addressing issues of this nature if, under the circumstances, it is inappropriate for the Chairman of the Board to assume such leadership; |
• | meets informally with other outside directors between Board meetings to assure free and open communication within the group of outside directors; |
• | assists the Chairman of the Board in preparing the Board agenda so that the agenda includes items requested bynon-management members of our Board; |
• | administers the annual Board evaluation and reporting the results to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and |
• | assumes other responsibilities that thenon-management directors might designate from time to time. |
The Board periodically reviews the leadership structure and may make changes in the future.
Under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, NYSE rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act and compensation committee members must satisfy heightened independence criteria set forth in NYSE rules. Under NYSE rules, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if the company’s board of directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the company, either directly or indirectly, that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
Our Board has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each of our directors concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships with us and our senior management, our Board has determined that all but three of our incumbent directors, William H. Lyon, Matthew R. Zaist and Michael Barr, are independent directors under the standards established by the SEC and the NYSE. In making the aforementioned determinations, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that eachnon-employee director has with us and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the following:
• | During 2015 the Company entered into separate land banking and land acquisition transactions in the ordinary course, in each case with entities that were not a parent or subsidiary in the same consolidated group as Mr. Harrison’s employer at the time, Colony Capital. Further, Mr. Harrison did not have a direct or indirect material interest in these transactions. Accordingly, our Board determined that Mr. Harrison does not have a material relationship with us and that Mr. Harrison is an independent director under the standards established by the SEC and the NYSE. |
In addition, the Board has considered that Mr. Ammerman currently serves on the audit committee of more than three publicly traded companies, including William Lyon Homes (NYSE), Fidelity National Financial Inc.
12
Table of Contents
(NYSE), J. Alexander’s Holdings, Inc. (NYSE), and Stantec Inc. (NYSE). Our Board has determined that Mr. Ammerman’s simultaneous service on the audit committees of more than three public companies does not impair his ability to serve effectively as a member of our Audit Committee.
Our Board held five meetings during fiscal year 2017. During fiscal year 2017, all of our incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the combined total of (i) all Board meetings and (ii) all meetings of committees of the Board of which the incumbent director was a member. Our Board has adopted a policy that all directors attend the annual meeting of stockholders, either in person or telephonically, absent unusual circumstances. All of our directors who were then serving in office attended our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders either in person or by telephone.
Ournon-management directors meet regularly in executive sessions without management, to consider such matters as they deem appropriate. It is our Board’s policy that our lead independent director presides over the executive sessions. Our Board has appointed Mr. Hunt to serve as our lead independent director. Executive sessions of ournon-management directors are typically held in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting. In addition, during times when ournon-management directors include directors who are not also independent directors, the independent directors also meet separately in executive session as deemed appropriate, and in any event at least one time per year.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We currently have three standing committees: an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. From time to time, the Board may form a new committee or disband a current committee, depending on the circumstances. The charters of all three of our standing Board committees are available on our website under the “Governance — Committee Charters” section athttp://investors.lyonhomes.com/. The inclusion of our website address in this proxy statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this proxy statement.
The Company has a standing Audit Committee, which is chaired by Douglas K. Ammerman. The following five members of the Board served on the Audit Committee during 2017: Messrs. Ammerman, Harrison, Hunt and Niemann, and Ms. Schell. Effective in February 2018, there are currently three Board members serving on the Audit Committee, including Messrs. Ammerman and Niemann and Ms. Schell. Our Board has determined that each of these directors is independent as defined by the applicable rules of the NYSE and the SEC, and that each member of the Audit Committee meets the financial literacy and experience requirements of the applicable SEC and NYSE rules. In addition, our Board has determined that Mr. Ammerman is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. Except for Mr. Ammerman, none of the Audit Committee members serves on the Audit Committee of more than three public companies. As described above, our Board has determined that Mr. Ammerman’s simultaneous service on the audit committee of more than three public companies does not impair his ability to effectively serve on the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met seven times in 2017.
Our Audit Committee charter requires that the Audit Committee oversee our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes. The primary responsibilities and functions of our Audit Committee are, among other things, as follows:
• | approve in advance all auditing services, including the provision of comfort letters in connection with securities offerings and variousnon-audit services permitted by applicable law to be provided to the Company by its independent auditors; |
• | evaluate our independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance; |
• | determine and approve the engagement and compensation of our independent auditor; |
13
Table of Contents
• | meet with our independent auditor to review and approve the plan and scope for each audit and review and recommend action with respect to the results of such audit; |
• | annually evaluate our independent auditor’s internal quality-control procedures and all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company which may impact their objectivity and independence; |
• | monitor the rotation of partners and managers of the independent auditor as required; |
• | review our consolidated financial statements; |
• | review our critical accounting policies and estimates, including any significant changes in the Company’s selection or application of accounting principles; |
• | review analyses prepared by management and/or the independent auditor setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements; |
• | resolve any disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting; |
• | review and discuss with the Company’s independent auditor and management the Company’s audited financial statements, including related disclosures; |
• | discuss with our management and our independent auditor the results of our annual audit and the review of our audited financial statements; |
• | meet periodically with our management and internal audit team to consider the adequacy of our internal controls and the objectivity of our financial reporting; |
• | review and administer the Company’s related party transaction policies and procedures and oversee related matters; |
• | establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and |
• | retain, in its sole discretion, its own separate advisors. |
The Company has a standing Compensation Committee, which is chaired by Matthew R. Niemann. The following four members of the Board served on the Compensation Committee during all of 2017: Messrs. Ammerman, Hunt and Niemann, and Ms. Schell, and Mr. Harrison served on the Compensation Committee for a portion of 2017. Effective in February 2018, there are currently three Board members serving on the Compensation Committee, including Messrs. Niemann and Harrison and Ms. Schell. Our Board has determined that each of these directors is independent under NYSE rules. The Compensation Committee met three times in 2017.
Pursuant to its charter, the primary responsibilities and functions of our Compensation Committee are, among other things, as follows:
• | evaluate the performance of executive officers in light of certain corporate goals and objectives and determine and approve their compensation packages; |
• | recommend to the Board new compensation programs or arrangements if deemed appropriate; |
• | recommend to the Board compensation programs for directors based on the practices of similarly situated companies; |
• | counsel management with respect to personnel compensation policies and programs; |
• | review and approve all equity compensation plans of the Company; |
• | oversee the Company’s assessment of any risks arising from its compensation programs and policies likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company; |
14
Table of Contents
• | prepare an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement; and |
• | retain, in its sole discretion, its own separate advisors. |
In February 2017, similar to 2016, the Compensation Committee established a subcommittee comprised of Matthew R. Zaist in his capacity as a member of the Board, as sole member, and delegated authority to such subcommittee to grant a certain number of restricted stock awards to certainnon-executive officer employees of the Company who are not participants in the 2017 Incentive Program, and subject to certain other limitations and conditions. In accordance with this delegated authority, for fiscal year 2017, the subcommittee granted a total of 51,545 shares of restricted stock. In February 2018, the Compensation Committee again established a subcommittee for this purpose and with similar authority, once again comprised of Matthew R. Zaist in his capacity as a member of the Board, as sole member.
The Compensation Committee reviews annually the independence of its compensation consultants and other advisors. In November 2016 the Compensation Committee retained Mercer (US) Inc. (“Mercer”) as its independent compensation consultant to advise on our executive compensation pay structure and director compensation matters for 2017. In November 2017, the Compensation Committee again retained Mercer as its independent compensation consultant to advise on our executive compensation pay structure and director compensation matters for 2018. Prior to, and following, such engagements, the Compensation Committee evaluated the independence of Mercer, considering the independence factors as required by the NYSE, and concluded that no conflict of interest would prevent Mercer from serving as an independent consultant to the Committee. For more information on the processes and procedures followed by the Compensation Committee for the consideration and determination of executive officer compensation, see the “Executive Compensation” section in this proxy statement.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Company has a standing Nominating Committee, which is chaired by Gary H. Hunt. The following five members of the Board served on the Nominating Committee during 2017: Messrs. Hunt, Ammerman, Harrison and Niemann, and Ms. Schell. Effective in February 2018, there are currently three Board members serving on the Nominating Committee, including Messrs. Hunt, Ammerman and Harrison. Our Board has determined that each of these directors is independent under NYSE rules. The Nominating Committee met three times in 2017.
Pursuant to its charter, the primary responsibilities and functions of our Nominating Committee are, among other things, as follows:
• | establish standards for service on our Board and nominating guidelines and principles; |
• | identify, screen and review qualified individuals to be nominated for election to our Board and to fill vacancies or newly created Board positions; |
• | assist the Board in making determinations regarding director independence as well as the financial literacy and expertise of Audit Committee members and nominees; |
• | establish criteria for committee membership and recommend directors to serve on each committee; |
• | consider and make recommendations to our Board regarding its size and composition, committee composition and structure and procedures affecting directors; |
• | conduct an annual evaluation and review of the performance of existing directors; |
• | review and monitor compliance with, and the effectiveness of, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines; |
• | monitor our corporate governance principles and practices and make recommendations to our Board regarding governance matters, including the Certificate of Incorporation, our bylaws and charters of our committees; and |
• | retain, in its sole discretion, its own separate advisors. |
15
Table of Contents
Our Board may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.
Our Board is actively involved in oversight of risks that could affect the Company. The Board satisfies this responsibility through full reports by each committee chair (principally, the Audit Committee chair) regarding such committee’s considerations and actions, as well as through regular reports directly from the officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within the Company.
The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the risk management function at the Company on behalf of the Board. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee works closely with management. The Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with members of management and, among things, receives an update on management’s assessment of risk exposures (including risks related to liquidity, credit and operations, among others). The Audit Committee chair provides periodic reports on risk management to the full Board.
In addition to the Audit Committee, the other committees of the Board consider the risks within their areas of responsibility.
In 2018, at the request of the Compensation Committee, Mercer conducted an evaluation of the Company’s compensation program risk profile in collaboration with Company management, including an assessment of all Company compensation plans, with a particular focus on plans in which senior executives participate, using Mercer’s qualitative evaluation criteria based on best practices for compensation design and risk management. The Compensation Committee and management reviewed and agreed with Mercer’s conclusion that the Company’s compensation policies and practices do not present risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Communications with the Board of Directors
Any stockholder or other interested party may contact an individual director or the lead independent director (either by name or title), our Board as a group, or a specified Board committee or group, including thenon-management directors as a group, by sending written communication to: William Lyon Homes, 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
Management will initially receive and process communications before forwarding them to the addressee(s). We generally will not forward to the directors a communication that is primarily commercial in nature, relates to an improper or irrelevant topic, or requests general information about the Company.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”), that is applicable to all directors, employees and officers of the Company. The Code of Ethics constitutes the Company’s “code of ethics” within the meaning of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Company intends to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of the Code of Ethics, or waivers of such provisions applicable to the Company’s directors and executive officers, on the Company’s website under the “Governance” section athttp://investors.lyonhomes.com/.
The Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website under the “Governance” section athttp://investors.lyonhomes.com. In addition, printed copies of the Code of Ethics are available upon written request to Investor Relations, William Lyon Homes, 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660. The inclusion of our website address herein does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this proxy statement.
16
Table of Contents
ADVISORY VOTE ON APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory(non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules(“say-on-pay vote”).
At our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders held on May 27, 2014, our stockholders voted on an advisory basis with respect to the frequency of futuresay-on-pay votes. Consistent with the recommendation of our Board, over 94% of votes cast were voted in favor of every “1 Year” for such frequency, and the Company has adopted annualsay-on-pay votes until the next required vote on such frequency, which will be held in 2020. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to approve (on an advisory basis) the compensation of our NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as disclosed in this proxy statement. The nextsay-on-pay vote will be held in 2019.
At the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved our NEOs’ 2016 fiscal year compensation (on an advisory basis) by 92.7% of the votes cast. We believe that this strong approval rating was reflective of stockholders’ confidence in our existing compensation policies and structure. For 2017, while the Compensation Committee made certain modest adjustments to provide compensation and award opportunities commensurate with growth in our business, it generally kept the program intact from the previous year, maintaining the Company’s pay philosophy of providing rewards that have a strong alignment with performance delivered and with stockholders.
During 2017 the Company delivered another year of strong overall financial and operational results which, together with the continued progress on strategic goals during the year, we believe position us well for future financial gains. Certain performance highlights for 2017 include:
Strong Financial Results | • Homes Sales Revenue of $1.8 billion (28% increase over 2016), the highest level in the history of the Company, and New Home Deliveries of 3,239 (16% increase over 2016), the highest in thirteen years
• Pre-Tax Income, excluding debt extinguishment costs, of $142.5 million, up 39%
• Generated Net Income available to common stockholders of $48.1 million, or $1.24 per diluted share, and Adjusted Net Income* available to common stockholders, which excludes $14.1 million of loss from extinguishment of debt (net of income tax) and excludes the impact of tax reform of $23.1 million, of $85.3 million, or $2.21 per diluted share, both up 43%
• Adjusted EBITDA* of $243.7 million (30% increase over 2016)
| |
Key Operational Performance Indicators | • Average Sales Locations of 84 communities for full year 2017 (14% increase over the 2016 average)
• Net New Home Orders of 3,328, the highest annual number of net new home orders in 13 years
|
17
Table of Contents
• Dollar Value of Backlog as of December 31, 2017 was $433 million, and Units in Backlog of 822, representing the highestyear-end backlog figures in over 12 years
| ||
Execution of Strategic Initiatives | • Achieved a year of growth in orders, deliveries, revenue, profitability and community count, while also improving the Company’s balance sheet and leverage position
| |
• Reduced the ratio of debt to total capital from 58.6% to 54.5%, and net debt to total capital (net of cash)* from 57.6% to 49.6%, respectively, as of the end of 2017, and ended the year with total liquidity of approximately $350 million
|
* | Adjusted net income, adjusted EBITDA and the ratio of net debt to total capital are not financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to adjusted EBITDA is provided inAppendix A hereto. The Company believes that the ratio of net debt to total capital is a relevant and useful financial measure to investors in understanding the leverage employed in its operations, and may be helpful in comparing the Company with other companies in the homebuilding industry to the extent they provide similar information. For a reconciliation of thisnon-GAAP measure to the ratio of debt to total capital, see page 62 of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. |
In 2017 the Compensation Committee used an executive pay program that required management to deliver strong results to earn awards, and maintained pay policies and programs that support shareholder interests. Certain pay practices and outcomes in light of the performance results in 2017 include:
Pay Program Design that Emphasizes Pay for Performance | • Placed significant weighting on at risk pay (approximately 70% - 80% for our CEO and other NEOs)
• Established challenging performance goals
| |
Actual 2017 Payouts Aligned Pay for Performance | • The Company achieved 105.1% of the Adjusted EBITDA goal under its cash incentive program, which led to payment at 120.5% of target for that portion (which is 75%) of the cash incentive
• With the combination of strong revenue and profit growth, improvement in profit margins, reduction in debt levels, and strong execution of strategic and operational objectives, the Compensation Committee determined to pay out the strategic component (which is 25% of the target award opportunity) of the cash incentive between 175% and 200% of target, resulting in aggregate payout of the cash incentive between 134% and 140% of target levels for our NEOs
• Our NEOs earned approximately 175% of the target amount of their 2017 performance- based restricted shares, which vest ratably over a three-year period after the |
18
Table of Contents
performance period. This earning level reflects achievement of the Adjusted EPS target, as adjusted to exclude the impact of tax reform legislation, which exceeded the maximum performance level for that metric and funded at 200% of target, and the Adjusted Return on Equity (“ROE”), as similarly adjusted, which was 112.6% of target and translated to a payout of 150% of target
|
For a comprehensive description of our executive compensation program, policies and objectives, including the specific elements of executive compensation that comprised the program in 2017, please refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement. The Summary Compensation Table and other executive compensation tables (and accompanying narrative disclosures) that follow it, beginning on page 36, provide additional information about the compensation we paid to our NEOs in 2017.
In considering their vote, we encourage stockholders to carefully review our compensation policies and decisions regarding our NEOs as presented in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement and the tabular, and accompanying narrative, disclosure.
Our Board believes that the information provided above and within the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement demonstrates that our executive compensation program was designed appropriately and is working to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation.
The following resolution is submitted for an advisory stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders of William Lyon Homes approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of William Lyon Homes’ named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion set forth in this proxy statement.
Thesay-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or our Board. Althoughnon-binding, the vote will provide information to our Compensation Committee regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices, which the Compensation Committee will be able to consider when determining executive compensation for the years to come.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DESCRIBED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SECTION AND THE RELATED TABULAR AND NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
19
Table of Contents
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table sets forth information as of the record date, March 29, 2018, regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock by: (i) each of our directors and director nominees; (ii) each of our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2017; (iii) all of our current directors and current executive officers as a group; and (iv) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our outstanding voting securities based on a review of publicly available statements of beneficial ownership filed with the SEC on Schedule 13G, and one Form 4, through March 29, 2018. With respect to our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2017, the titles included in the table below reflect current titles. Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite the stockholder’s name, subject to community property laws, where applicable. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each stockholder below is c/o William Lyon Homes, 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660.
CLASS A COMMON STOCK(1) | CLASS B COMMON STOCK(1) | PERCENT OF TOTAL VOTING POWER(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | TITLE | Number | Percent of Class(2) | Number | Percent of Class | |||||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers and Directors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
William H. Lyon | | Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board | 403,213 | (4) | 1.2 | % | 6,724,944 | (5) | 100 | % | 50.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | | President & Chief Executive |
| 814,965 | (6) | 2.3 | % | — | — | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Brian W. Doyle | | Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer |
| 311,121 | (7) | * | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||
Colin T. Severn | | Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
| 159,895 | (8) | * | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | | Senior Vice President, General |
| 68,551 | (9) | * | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||
Douglas K. Ammerman | Director | 50,246 | (10) | * | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||||
Michael Barr | Director | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas F. Harrison | Director | 21,314 | (11) | * | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||||
Gary H. Hunt | Director | 34,446 | (12) | * | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||||
Matthew R. Niemann | Director | 43,963 | (13) | * | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||||
Lynn Carlson Schell | Director | 57,644 | (14) | * | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 individuals) | 1,965,358 | (15) | 5.6 | % | 6,724,944 | 100 | % | 52.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
5% Stockholders (not listed above): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(16) | 4,334,168 | 12.6 | % | — | — | 7.4 | % |
20
Table of Contents
CLASS A COMMON STOCK(1) | CLASS B COMMON STOCK(1) | PERCENT OF TOTAL VOTING POWER(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | TITLE | Number | Percent of Class(2) | Number | Percent of Class | |||||||||||||||||
GMT Capital Corp(17) | 3,495,417 | 10.1 | % | — | — | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors | 2,420,037 | 7.0 | % | — | — | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.(19) | 2,028,052 | 5.9 | % | — | — | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Integrated Core Strategies (US) LLC (20) | 1,688,912 | 4.9 | % | — | — | 2.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group (21) | 1,454,145 | 4.22 | % | — | — | 2.5 | % |
* Denotes less than 1.0% of beneficial ownership.
(1) | Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules, and includes any shares as to which the stockholder has sole or shared voting power or investment power, and also any shares which the stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 29, 2018, whether through the exercise or conversion of any stock option, convertible security, warrant or other right. The indication herein that shares are beneficially owned is not an admission on the part of the stockholder that he, she or it is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of those shares. |
(2) | Based on (i) 34,454,130 shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding as of March 29, 2018, including an aggregate of 1,251,921 unvested shares of restricted stock (426,075 of which remain subject to achievement of a performance condition), (ii) 4,817,394 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding as of March 29, 2018, and (c) 1,907,550 shares of Class B common stock issuable upon the exercise of a warrant (the “Class B Warrant”) held by Lyon Shareholder 2012, LLC (“Lyon LLC”). The Class B Warrant is exercisable at any time prior to February 24, 2022. Shares of common stock which the applicable stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 29, 2018 are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such rights for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person but are not treated as outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage of any other person. |
(3) | Each share of Class A common stock and unvested restricted stock is entitled to one vote per share. Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to five votes per share. |
(4) | Includes (i) 163,009 shares of Class A Common Stock, (ii) 63,564 shares of unvested restricted stock that remain subject to achievement of a performance condition, (iii) 133,707 additional shares of unvested restricted stock, (iv) 40,000 shares of Class A common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 29, 2018, and (v) 2,933 shares of Class A common stock held by The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust established July 28, 2000 (the “Lyon Trust”). William H. Lyon (our Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board) is Trustee of the Lyon Trust and holds voting and dispositive power over these shares. The address of The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust is c/o William H. Lyon, PO Box 8858, Newport Beach, CA 92658-8858. |
(5) | Represents (i) 4,817,394 shares of Class B common stock held by Lyon LLC and (ii) the Class B Warrant held by Lyon LLC. The Class B common stock is convertible into Class A common stock at any time at the election of the holder, as well as under certain other circumstances. The Class B Warrant is immediately exercisable and expires on February 24, 2022. The members of Lyon LLC are the LYON SHAREHOLDER 2012 IRREVOCABLE TRUST NO. 1 established December 24, 2012, the LYON SHAREHOLDER 2012 IRREVOCABLE TRUST NO. 2 established December 24, 2012 and the Lyon Trust (collectively, the “Trusts”). William H. Lyon (our Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board) is the beneficiary of each of the Trusts, and is the manager of Lyon LLC. In such capacity, William H. Lyon has voting and investment power of the securities held by Lyon LLC. The address of Lyon LLC is 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660. |
(6) | Includes (i) 150,551 shares of Class A common stock, (ii) 96,026 shares of Class A common stock held by a limited liability company of which Mr. Zaist is a manager and in which Mr. Zaist’s trust holds a controlling interest (the “LLC”), (iii) 109,330 shares of unvested restricted stock that remain subject to achievement of a performance condition, (iv) 169,361 additional shares of unvested restricted stock, (v) 123,317 shares of Class A common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 29, 2018 and (vi) 166,380 shares of Class A common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 29, 2018 that are held by the LLC. |
(7) | Includes (i) 102,940 shares of Class A Common Stock, (ii) 50,850 shares of unvested restricted stock that remain subject to achievement of a performance condition, (iii) 79,512 additional shares of unvested restricted stock, and (iv) 77,819 shares of Class A common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 29, 2018. |
(8) | Includes (i) 43,001 shares of Class A common stock, (ii) 34,324 shares of unvested restricted stock that remain subject to achievement of a performance condition, (iii) 54,206 additional shares of unvested restricted stock, and (iv) 28,364 shares of Class A common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 29, 2018. |
21
Table of Contents
(9) | Includes (i) 16,363 shares of Class A common stock, (ii) 22,882 shares of unvested restricted stock that remain subject to achievement of a performance condition, and (iii) 29,306 additional shares of unvested restricted stock. |
(10) | Includes (i) 46,051 shares of Class A common stock and (ii) 4,195 shares of unvested restricted stock. |
(11) | Includes (i) 17,119 shares of Class A common stock and (ii) 4,195 shares of unvested restricted stock. |
(12) | Includes (i) 11,069 shares of Class A common stock, (ii) 18,229 shares of Class A common stock held by a solo defined benefit plan of which Mr. Hunt is the sole beneficiary, and (iii) 5,148 shares of unvested restricted stock. |
(13) | Includes (i) 39,768 shares of Class A common stock and (ii) 4,195 shares of unvested restricted stock. |
(14) | Includes (i) 53,449 shares of Class A common stock and (ii) 4,195 shares of unvested restricted stock. |
(15) | Includes (i) 637,227 shares of Class A common stock, (ii) 280,950 shares of unvested restricted stock that remain subject to achievement of a performance condition, (ii) 488,388 additional shares of unvested restricted stock, and (iii) 358,061 shares of Class A common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 29, 2018. |
(16) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 9, 2018, BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company, and its subsidiaries, BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock Investment Management, LLC and BlackRock Japan Co Ltd. (collectively, “BlackRock”), has sole voting power over 4,263,800 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,334,168 shares of our Class A common stock owned by BlackRock. According to its 13G filing, various persons have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of the common stock of the Company and no one person’s interest in the common stock of the Company is more than five percent of the total outstanding common shares. The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. |
(17) | Based solely on a Form 4 filed with the SEC on January 30, 2018 (the “Form 4”) jointly by Bay Resource Partners, L.P. (“Bay”), Bay II Resource Partners, L.P. (“Bay II”), Bay Resource Partners Offshore Master Fund, L.P. (“Offshore Fund”), GMT Capital Corp. (“GMT Capital”), and Thomas E. Claugus (“Claugus” and collectively, the “GMT Reporting Persons”), the GMT Reporting Persons owned an aggregate of 3,495,417 shares of our Class A common stock as of such date. According to the Form 4, GMT Capital, the general partner of Bay and Bay II, has the power to direct the affairs of Bay and Bay II, including the voting and disposition of shares. As the discretionary investment manager of the Offshore Fund and certain other accounts, GMT Capital has power to direct the voting and disposition of shares held by the Offshore Fund and such accounts. Mr. Claugus is the President of GMT Capital and in that capacity directs the operations of each of Bay and Bay II and the voting and disposition of shares held by the Offshore Fund and separate client accounts managed by GMT Capital. GMT Capital and Mr. Claugus may be deemed to beneficially own indirect pecuniary interest as the result of performance-based fees and profit allocations. Each of GMT Capital and Mr. Claugus disclaims such beneficial ownership except to the extent ultimately realized. 3,495,417 shares of common stock is the aggregate number of shares of common stock owned by the GMT Reporting Persons and is owned as follows: Bay = 955,010 shares directly owned by it; Bay II = 734,680 shares directly owned by it; Offshore Fund = 1,612,227 shares directly owned by it; GMT Capital = 56,100 shares of common stock beneficially owned by it with respect to separate client accounts managed by it; Claugus = 137,400 shares directly owned by him. Based on the SEC filings, the business address of GMT Capital is 2300 Windy Ridge Parkway Suite 550 South, Atlanta, GA 30339. |
(18) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2018, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, (“Dimensional Fund”) has sole voting power over 2,308,928 shares, and sole dispositive power over 2,420,037 shares, of our Class A common stock owned by its investment advisory clients. Dimensional Fund is an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. Dimensional Fund furnishes investment advice to four investment companies and serves as investment manager orsub-adviser to certain comingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (such as investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as the “Funds”). In certain cases, subsidiaries of Dimensional Fund may act as an adviser orsub-adviser to certain Funds. In its role as investment advisor,sub-adviser and/or manager, Dimensional Fund or its subsidiaries (collectively, “Dimensional”) may possess voting and/or investment power over the securities of the Company that are owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of the Company held by the Funds. However, according to the 13G, all securities reported on the 13G are owned by the Funds. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities. The Funds described above have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of the securities held in their respective accounts. To the knowledge of Dimensional, the interest of any one such Fund does not exceed 5% of the class of securities. Dimensional Fund disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities. The address of Dimensional Fund is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin TX 78746. |
(19) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2018, jointly by Ameriprise Financial, Inc., a parent holding company (“AFI”), and its subsidiary, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (“CMIA” and jointly, the “AFI Reporting Persons”), the AFI Reporting Persons have shared voting power over 1,932,697 shares, and shared |
22
Table of Contents
dispositive power over 2,028,052 shares, of our Class A common stock owned by CMIA’s investment advisory clients. AFI is a parent holding company. CMIA is an investment adviser registered under section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and is the subsidiary which acquired the securities reported on the Schedule 13G. AFI, as the parent company of CMIA, may be deemed to beneficially own the shares reported herein by CMIA. According to its 13G filing, the shares reported by AFI include those shares separately reported by CMIA. Each of AFI and CMIA disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares reported on the 13G. The address of AFI is 145 Ameriprise Financial Center, Minneapolis, MN 55474. The address of CMIA is 225 Franklin St., Boston, MA 02110. |
(20) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 5, 2018, i) Integrated Core Strategies (US) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Integrated Core Strategies”), beneficially owned 1,082,586 shares of the Issuer’s Class A Common Stock; ii) Integrated Assets II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Integrated Assets II”), beneficially owned 586,924 shares of the Issuer’s Class A Common Stock; and iii) Integrated Assets, Ltd., an exempted company organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (“Integrated Assets”), beneficially owned 19,402 shares of the Issuer’s Class A Common Stock. Millennium International Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Millennium International Management”), is the investment manager to Integrated Assets and may be deemed to have shared voting control and investment discretion over securities owned by Integrated Assets. Millennium Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Millennium Management”), is the general partner of the managing member of Integrated Core Strategies and Integrated Assets II and may be deemed to have shared voting control and investment discretion over securities owned by Integrated Core Strategies and Integrated Assets II. Millennium Management is also the general partner of the 100% shareholder of Integrated Assets and may be deemed to have shared voting control and investment discretion over securities owned by Integrated Assets. Millennium Group Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Millennium Group Management”), is the managing member of Millennium Management and may also be deemed to have shared voting control and investment discretion over securities owned by Integrated Core Strategies and Integrated Assets II. Millennium Group Management is also the general partner of Millennium International Management and may be deemed to have shared voting control and investment discretion over securities owned by Integrated Assets. Israel A. Englander, a United States citizen (“Mr. Englander”), controls the managing member of Millennium Group Management and may also be deemed to have shared voting control and investment discretion over securities owned by Integrated Core Strategies, Integrated Assets II and Integrated Assets. The foregoing should not be construed in and of itself as an admission by Millennium International Management, Millennium Management, Millennium Group Management or Mr. Englander as to beneficial ownership of the securities owned by Integrated Core Strategies, Integrated Assets II or Integrated Assets, as the case may be. As of the date of the 13G filing, Millennium Management, Millennium Group Management and Mr. Englander may be deemed to have beneficially owned 1,688,912 shares of the Issuer’s Class A Common Stock. Based on SEC filings, the business address of Integrated Core Strategies is c/o Millennium Management LLC, 666 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10103. |
(21) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2018, The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) has sole voting power over 34,089 shares, and sole dispositive power over 1,421,251 shares, of our Class A common stock owned by its investment advisory clients. Vanguard is an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. According to its 13G filing, Vanguard and its subsidiaries, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“VFTC”) and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. (“VIA”), have shared voting power over 1,200 shares, and shared dispositive power over 32,894 shares, of our Class A common stock owned by Vanguard’s investment advisory clients. The aggregate amount of shares of our Class A common stock owned by Vanguard, VFTC and VIA is 1,454,145. VFTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard and is the beneficial owner of 3,694 shares of our Class A common shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. VIA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard and is the beneficial owner of 3,595 shares of our Class A common shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offering. The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. |
23
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section discusses the material elements of the compensation programs and policies in place for the Company’s named executive officers (“NEOs”), who for 2017 were:
• | Matthew R. Zaist, President and Chief Executive Officer; |
• | William H. Lyon, Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board; |
• | Bryan Doyle, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer*; |
• | Colin T. Severn, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and |
• | Jason R. Liljestrom, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
* Mr. Doyle was promoted from Executive Vice President of Operations to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer by the Company’s board of directors on March 31, 2017.
Selected 2017 Business Highlights
The U.S. housing market continued to demonstrate strong supply and demand fundamentals in 2017, building upon the improvement from previous years, and William Lyon Homes achieved another year of continued improvement in its key operating and financial metrics. The Company experienced a record homebuilding revenue year in 2017, with homebuilding revenue of $1.8 billion, demonstrating healthy double-digit year-over-year growth in homebuilding revenue as well as new home deliveries and orders, while also making meaningful improvements in its balance sheet and leverage metrics as of the end of the year. The Company’s strong performance in 2017 came against a backdrop of tight labor markets and cost increases, weather challenges andgeo-political change, and while these challenges facing the industry remain as well as a potentially volatile interest rate environment, the Company believes that its markets are characterized by attractive long-term housing fundamentals, and that our business strategy and leadership, as outlined in more detail below, positions us well for future financial gains.
Category | Performance Highlights | |
Fiscal Year 2017 Financial Highlights (comparisons to 2016 fiscal year) | • Grew our home sales revenue by 28% to approximately $1.8 billion, the highest level in the 60+ year history of the Company
• Increased new home deliveries by 16% to 3,239 new homes, a thirteen-year high
• ProducedPre-tax Income, excluding debt extinguishment costs, of $142.5 million, up 39%
• Generated Net Income available to common stockholders of $48.1 million, or $1.24 per diluted share, and Adjusted Net Income* available to common stockholders, which excludes $14.1 million of loss from extinguishment of debt (net of income tax) and excludes the impact of tax reform of $23.1 million, of $85.3 million, or $2.21 per diluted share, both up 43%, the highest levels in twelve years
• Grew Adjusted EBITDA* to $243.7 million, up 30% |
24
Table of Contents
Category | Performance Highlights | |
Key Operational Performance Indicators | • Average sales locations for the full year 2017 was 84 communities, representing a 14% increase over the 2016 average, spurring a 20% increase in the number of net new home orders to 3,328, the highest level in thirteen years.
• Our successful gross margin expansion, coupled with continued improvement in SG&A leverage, led to a 47% year-over-year increase in operating income, which translated into an operating margin increase of 100 basis points for the year
• The Company’s consolidated monthly absorption rate increased to 3.3 sales per month per community for the 2017 period, up from 3.1 for the 2016 period
• Our strong sales activity drove backlog dollar value of $433 million and backlog units of 822 as of December 31, 2017, representing the highestyear-end backlog figures in over twelve years
| |
Execution of Strategic Initiatives | • Successfully executed a capital markets transaction in January 2017, refinancing the Company’s most expensive debt with the issuance of new 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2025, which will save the Company approximately $10 million in annual interest expense and which extended and further staggered our senior notes maturities.
• Remained in operational growth mode, achieving a year of growth in orders, deliveries, revenue, profitability, and community count, while also improving the Company’s balance sheet and leverage position
• Reduced the ratio of debt to total capital from 58.6% to 54.5%, and net debt to total capital (net of cash)* from 57.6% to 49.6%, respectively, as of the end of 2017
• Generated cash from operations of $167.5 million in 2017, which enabled us to end the year with $183 million of cash on hand and overall liquidity of approximately $350 million
• Our strong 2017 performance and meaningful improvement in our balance sheet and leverage metrics put us in position to execute on a compelling acquisition that furthers our strategic objective of continued emphasis on the entry-level buyer segment and enhances our Western geographic footprint. We believe that the acquisition of RSI Communities in early 2018, a Southern California and Texas based homebuilder with approximately 11,000 lots owned or controlled, will support strategic growth by enabling market expansion, increased geographic diversification, and enhanced management expertise. |
* | Adjusted net income, adjusted EBITDA and the ratio of net debt to total capital are not financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Reconciliations of net income available to common stockholders to adjusted net income and to adjusted EBITDA are each provided inAppendix A hereto. The Company believes that the ratio of net debt to total capital is a relevant and useful financialmeasure to investors in |
25
Table of Contents
understanding the leverage employed in its operations, and may be helpful incomparing the Company withother companies in the homebuilding industry to the extent they providesimilar information. For a reconciliation of thisnon-GAAP measure to the ratio of debt to total capital, see page 62 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. |
Pay for Performance Alignment
The Company’s pay philosophy is to provide rewards that have a strong alignment with operating performance delivered as well as with stockholders. In line with this philosophy, the Compensation Committee used an executive pay program that requires management to deliver strong results to earn awards, and maintains pay policies and programs that support shareholder interests. The shareholder alignment was reinforced by our approach of providing a significant portion of target total compensation in long-term incentive equity value (more than 40% for our CEO). Furthermore, for all of our NEOs 67% of the target long-term incentive equity value was provided in the form of performance-based restricted stock. Ultimately, we delivered 2017 operating results that demonstrated strong year-over-year growth and exceeded our challenging performance targets for the year. Our incentive plans include direct performance factor measurement in both the cash incentive and equity performance shares. As a result of exceeding our internal performance objectives, actual 2017 cash incentive and performance equity payouts were above target. A summary overview of the pay structure and awards delivered in light of the performance results is outlined below:
Category | 2017 Pay Practices and Outcomes | |
Pay Program Design that Emphasizes Pay for Performance | • Placed significant weighting of approximately 70% - 80% on at risk pay for our CEO and other NEOs (based on total target compensation)
• Established challenging performance goals—for example, the 2017 Adjusted EBITDA target was set at a level that was 32% greater than the actual results of such metric for the 2016 fiscal year | |
Actual 2017 Payouts Aligned Pay With Performance | • The Company achieved 105.1% of the Adjusted EBITDA goal under its cash incentive program, which led to payment at 120.5% of target for that portion (which is 75%) of the cash incentive
• With the combination of strong revenue and profit growth, improvements in profit margins, reduction in debt levels, and excellent execution of strategic and operational objectives, the Compensation Committee determined that the payout of the 25% strategic portion of the cash incentive program should be between 175% and 200% of target for NEOs, resulting in overall aggregate cash incentive payouts ranging from 134% to 140% of target levels
• Our NEOs earned approximately 175% of the target amount of their 2017 performance-based restricted shares, which vest ratably over a three-year period after the performance period. This earning level reflects achievement of the Adjusted EPS target, as adjusted to exclude the impact of tax reform legislation, which exceeded the maximum performance level for that metric and funded at 200% of target, and the Adjusted Return on Equity (“ROE”), as similarly adjusted, which was 112.6% of target and translated to a payout of 150% of target |
26
Table of Contents
Category | 2017 Pay Practices and Outcomes | |
Other Compensation and Governance Highlights | • We maintain robust stock ownership guidelines that require our NEOs to hold 100% of their shares until they attain certainpre-established multiples of base salary which are 4x for our CEO and Executive Chairman and 2x for all other NEOs
• All of our employees and Board members are prohibited from engaging in certain speculative transactions such as short sales and limit orders that last more than 48 hours, and are subject to prohibitions against purchasing shares on margin and pledging the Company’s securities as collateral to secure loans, and entering into any hedging or similar transactions with respect to Company securities |
2017 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders voted to approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our NEOs for 2016. Approximately 92.7% of the votes cast with respect to this proposal were cast for approval of our NEOs’ compensation, which we believe was reflective of stockholders’ confidence in our existing compensation policies and structure, and the Compensation Committee determined that the executive compensation philosophy and compensation elements continued to be generally appropriate for 2017. No significant changes to the compensation program were made in 2017, with the exception of eliminating the use of net debt leverage ratio (“NDLR”) as a performance metric for the performance-based restricted stock awards. The aforementioned advisory vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was our fourth such vote following our initial public offering in May 2013. We continue to assess and periodically refine our compensation programs to better align with market and/or our strategic business needs, though we believe that the strong support received from our stockholders signals that significant changes to our pay program designs are not specifically needed at this time.
2018 Business Focus and Compensation Highlights
Based on the results of the 2017 advisory vote on executive compensation noted above, and the overall perspective of the Compensation Committee that our pay programs support positive business focus and create alignment with shareholders, we felt that limited changes to the compensation program were needed in 2018. The exception to this is that the Company will shift the weighting on strategic metrics for the short-term cash incentive opportunity to 50% for Messrs. Lyon and Liljestrom given their greater focus on strategic actions for the firm, as opposed today-to-day operations.
Role of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Consultants
The Company’s executive officer compensation decisions are made by the Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independentnon-employee members of the Company’s Board. The Compensation Committee receives recommendations from the Company’s Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, other than themselves. These individuals provide the Compensation Committee with insight on the individual and overall performance of executives, other than themselves, including the achievement of personal objectives, if any. The Compensation Committee is advised by and consults with outside independent compensation consultants as it deems appropriate. Since 2013, the Compensation Committee has retained Mercer (US) Inc. (“Mercer”) as its independent compensation consultant to advise on our executive compensation pay structure and director compensation matters. Prior to, and following, such engagements, the Compensation Committee evaluated the independence of Mercer, considering the independence factors as required by the NYSE, and concluded that no conflict of interest would prevent Mercer from serving as an independent consultant to the Committee. The Compensation Committee weighs the advice and feedback from its compensation consultant and the members of the Board of Directors, as
27
Table of Contents
well as the views of, and information gathered by, the members of management it has consulted in conjunction with its review of other information the Committee considers relevant when making decisions regarding executive officer compensation.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The primary goals of the Company’s compensation program are to:
• | Provide appropriate rewards for successful performance, and align pay and performance overall; |
• | Encourage retention of top executives who may have attractive opportunities at other companies, given the highly competitive homebuilding industry; |
• | Align executive pay with the interests of the Company’s stockholders; and |
• | Position its selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) costs at competitive levels when compared with other homebuilders who are considered peers. |
In general, the Compensation Committee strives to achieve an appropriate mix between equity incentive awards and cash payments in order to meet its compensation objectives. The Compensation Committee also generally seeks to place greater emphasis on long-term incentives for its senior executives. The objective of the Company’snon-cash and long-term incentive-based programs is to align the compensation of the NEOs with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. However, the Compensation Committee does not have rigid apportionment goals or policies for allocating compensation between long-term and short-term compensation or cash andnon-cash compensation. The Company’s mix of compensation elements is designed to reward recent results and motivate long-term performance through a combination of cash and equity incentive awards. The Compensation Committee uses peer group (see peer group information below) data as one input to assess the reasonableness and competitiveness of executive officer pay, and considers additional qualitative factors for the NEOs on an individual and aggregate basis.
With these objectives in mind, leading into 2017, the Compensation Committee requested that Mercer engage in an assessment of the Company’s executive compensation programs and practices in light of peer market practices and in consideration of Company business and talent strategy objectives. Mercer compiled information on the compensation practices of a homebuilding peer group that closely aligns with the Company’s revenue size, market capitalization and scope and scale of the business. The peer group selected for 2017 is consistent with the group used to assess 2016 compensation, and includes the following companies: KB Home, Meritage Homes, Hovnanian Enterprises, MDC Holdings, Beazer Homes USA, M/I Homes, Century Communities, LGI Homes, WCI Communities (maintained for purposes of historical compensation practices notwithstanding its pending acquisition by Lennar Corporation), AV Homes, and The New Home Company. The Committee used this peer group data to assess the reasonableness and competitiveness of executive officer compensation for NEOs. For 2017 the Committee did not have an explicit pay position strategy or target relative to peers by component of pay or by executive. While consideration of peer group data was one aspect of the process used to establish fiscal year 2017 compensation, the Compensation Committee also relied on its experience and judgment as well as the Company’s recent performance, the current economic environment and the Company’s growth plans and objectives to set overall compensation levels. The Compensation Committee also based its determinations for 2017 compensation levels on each individual NEO’s leadership qualities, operational performance, business responsibilities, career with our company, current compensation arrangements and long-term potential to enhance stockholder value.
Ultimately, upon review with Mercer and based on its overall review and assessment of our compensation policies and programs, the Compensation Committee continued to believe for 2017 that the existing pay programs were aligned with our overall pay for performance philosophy and were positioned appropriately given the competitive market and the respective contributions and capabilities of our executives. Further, the Committee believes that the 2017 target compensation levels approved for our NEOs in the aggregate are aligned with the peer reference points. Target pay adjustments made during 2017 were intended to recognize additional
28
Table of Contents
responsibilities and ongoing growth in the size and complexity of the Company, as well as to provide greater alignment of compensation and award opportunities for similar roles in the market. Modest changes made to the 2017 compensation program were intended to simplify the compensation program and highlight factors that influence the value delivered to our stockholders. For the annual short-term cash incentive plan, we continued to use a Strategic Objectives metric that covers 25% of the target opportunity for our NEOs that allows the Committee to provide more or less payout than that which would have been funded from the direct financial results, assuming that at least certain threshold operational performance metrics had been achieved. For our long-term incentive program, the 2017 grants included a balance of 33% time-vesting restricted shares and 67% performance-based restricted shares for all NEOs.
Elements of Compensation for 2017
Base Salary
The Compensation Committee generally reviews the base salary of the Company’s NEOs annually. For 2017, the Company does not regard salary as the principal component of compensation, and also uses short-term annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentives to reward performance and loyalty while keeping SG&A costs competitive. The table below shows each NEO’s annual base salary for each of the 2016 and 2017 fiscal years. During 2017, the Compensation Committee made targeted adjustments to salaries for several of the NEOs. For Mr. Zaist, the increase was intended to fully reflect his ongoing strong performance as the CEO of William Lyon Homes and provide greater alignment with market pay levels. Mr. Doyle’s increase corresponded with his promotion to EVP, Chief Operating Officer. Pay adjustments for Messrs. Severn and Liljestrom reflect ongoing strength in delivering upon their respective roles and providing alignment with market.
Name | FY 2016 Base Salary ($) | FY 2017 Base Salary ($) | ||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | 650,000 | 900,000 | ||||||
William H. Lyon | 750,000 | 750,000 | ||||||
Brian Doyle | 385,000 | 425,000 | ||||||
Colin T. Severn | 325,000 | 350,000 | ||||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | 285,000 | 325,000 |
In addition to base salaries, and consistent with 2016, in March 2017 the Compensation Committee utilized a short-term cash incentive and long-term equity incentive program for 2017 (the “2017 Incentive Program”) pursuant to the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”). This consisted of cash incentive payout opportunities and long-term incentive equity awards for all NEOs subject to various targets and conditions, as further described below.
2017 Cash Short-Term Incentive Compensation
Pursuant to the 2017 Incentive Program, for fiscal year 2017, all NEOs had an opportunity to earn a cash short-term incentive payout of up to 200% of their target cash incentive payout based 75% on the Company’s achievement of apre-established adjusted EBITDA target (“Adjusted EBITDA”) and 25% based on achievement of strategic objectives. With year-over-year improvement in either homebuilding revenues or net new home orders of at least 5%, in each case on a Company-wide basis, the strategic component of the 2017 Incentive Program funds at maximum and the Committee may exercise negative discretion to determine the final award value for the strategic portion based on its consideration of individual or Company strategic performance measures as it deems appropriate. This strategic objective approach was selected in order provide the Committee with greater flexibility in assessing and rewarding performance that may or may not be directly reflected in the financial results generated while maximizing the tax efficiency of the 2017 Incentive Program. Payouts as a percentage of target opportunity for NEOs are set forth in the table immediately below.
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||
Percent of Performance Target Achieved | 75 | % | 100 | % | 125 | % | ||||||
Cash Incentive Payout (as a % of Target Opportunity) | 37.5 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % |
29
Table of Contents
Achievement of performance criteria in between the threshold, target, and maximum levels above would result in payouts calculated based on linear interpolation between the performance multiples of target. Mr. Zaist’s target annual incentive opportunity was established as $1.7 million to provide a strong incentive to achieve targeted business results and align with market opportunities. Award levels for the other NEOs were also established to encourage achievement of challenging performance objectives and provide general alignment with market opportunities. Target cash incentive opportunities for eligible NEOs were as follows:
Name | FY 2017 Target Cash Incentive Opportunities | |||
Matthew R. Zaist | $ | 1,700,000 | ||
William H. Lyon | $ | 1,125,000 | ||
Brian Doyle | $ | 850,000 | ||
Colin T. Severn | $ | 400,000 | ||
Jason R. Liljestrom | $ | 325,000 |
As permitted under the terms of the 2017 Incentive Program, the Adjusted EBITDA metric is calculated based on net income available to common stockholders, plus (i) provision for income taxes, (ii) interest expense, (iii) amortization of capitalized interest included in cost of sales, (iv) stock based compensation, (v) depreciation and amortization, (vi) cash distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures, (vii) equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures, and (viii) loss from extinguishment of debt. Additionally, the Adjusted EBITDA target under the 2017 Incentive Program excludesnon-cash purchase accounting adjustments. The 2017 Adjusted EBITDA target was set at a level that was approximately 34% greater than the actual Adjusted EBITDA results of such metric for the 2016 fiscal year.
The table below shows the Adjusted EBITDA goal established and our actual performance for 2017:
Target Consolidated EBITDA(1) | Actual Consolidated EBITDA(1) | Percent of Target | ||
$216.8 million | $227.9 million | 105.1% |
(1) | The 2017 target and actual results excludenon-cash purchase accounting adjustments of approximately $15.8 million which are not excluded from the Company’sas-reported Adjusted EBITDA results. |
In addition to achievement of the Adjusted EBITDA metric at 105.1% of target, the Company achieved year-over-year increases in homebuilding revenue and net new home orders of 28% and 20%, respectively, resulting in a funding of the overall cash incentive portion of the 2017 Incentive Program at approximately 140%. In determining the final payout for each individual NEO under the 2017 Incentive Program, the Compensation Committee considered the combination of strong revenue and profit growth, improvement in profit margins, reduction in debt levels, execution of strategic and operational objectives, and the individual contributions of each NEO to driving such results of the Company in 2017. For example, in determining Mr. Zaist’s overall achievement of 140% of target, the Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, the Company’s continued execution on its growth objectives during his first full year as sole CEO, while at the same time driving balance sheet and credit metrics improvements, and strategically positioning the Company for continued growth. The aggregate 2017 Incentive Program payout for each NEO ranged from approximately 134% to 140% of target. Set forth below are the actual 2017 cash incentive payouts for each NEO:
Name | 2017 Cash Incentive Payout ($) | |||
Matthew R. Zaist | 2,386,025 | |||
William H. Lyon | 1,578,987 | |||
Brian Doyle | 1,139,888 | |||
Colin T. Severn | 536,418 | |||
Jason R. Liljestrom | 456,152 |
30
Table of Contents
Long-Term Equity-Based Compensation
Pursuant to the 2017 Incentive Program, the Company awards a mixture of 67% Performance-Based Restricted Stock and 33% Time-Based Restricted Stock (collectively, the “Long-Term Incentive Award”) to the NEOs, with a grant date of February 24, 2017, and the percentage split based on target number of shares of Performance-Based Restricted Stock. In 2017, the Company eliminated the NDLR metric, resulting in an equal weighting of EPS and ROE for the Performance Based Restricted Stock portion of the Long-Term Incentive Award. These metrics were chosen as they reflect key aspects of the business’ performance that can influence the value generated for stockholders.
For the portion of the Long-Term Incentive Award that is Time-Based Restricted Stock, the shares underlying such award vest in equal installments on each of March 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to the NEO’s continued service through each vesting date. For the portion of the Long-Term Incentive Award that is Performance-Based Restricted Stock, the actual number of shares to be earned under such awards (the “Earned Shares”) for our NEOs is based on the Company’syear-end 2017 achievement ofpre-established adjusted ROE and EPS targets, with such adjustments as may be approved by the Committee. Each measure is tied to half of the total shares of Performance-Based Restricted Stock. Adjusted ROE is calculated as the percentage equivalent of the fraction resulting from dividing the Company’s net income available to common stockholders during the 2017 performance period, as adjusted to reflect such adjustments as may be approved by the Compensation Committee, by the Total William Lyon Homes stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2017. Adjusted EPS is calculated as the Company’s net income available to common stockholders during 2017, as adjusted to reflect such adjustments as may be approved by the Compensation Committee, divided by 38,500,000, which reflected an estimate of the Company’s weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding for 2017.
One-third of the Earned Shares under the Performance-Based Restricted Stock will vest on each of March 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to the NEO’s continued service through each such vesting date. The Performance-Based Restricted Stock opportunities for our NEOs are set forth below:
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||
Percent of Adjusted ROE Target Achieved for 2017 Fiscal Year | 75 | % | 100 | % | 125 | % | ||||||
Target Shares Earned | 37.5 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||
Percent of Adjusted EPS Target Achieved for 2017 Fiscal Year | 90 | % | 100 | % | 110 | % | ||||||
Target Shares Earned | 45 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % |
Achievement of the adjusted ROE and EPS targets in between the threshold, target, and maximum levels above would result in Earned Shares calculated using linear interpolation between the performance multiples of target. Target award values were set in consideration of market award opportunities, individual contributions to the business and historical grant practices and performance. The following table sets forth a summary of the Long-Term Incentive Awards approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2017 for the NEOs:
Name | Threshold Shares of Performance-Based Restricted Stock | Target Shares of Performance-Based Restricted Stock | Maximum Shares of Performance-Based Restricted Stock | Shares of Time-Based Restricted Stock | ||||||||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | 29,386 | 78,362 | 156,724 | 39,182 | ||||||||||||
William H. Lyon | 23,946 | 63,858 | 127,718 | 31,931 | ||||||||||||
Brian Doyle | 10,416 | 27,776 | 55,554 | 13,890 | ||||||||||||
Colin T. Severn | 9,466 | 25,246 | 50,494 | 12,624 | ||||||||||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | 4,860 | 12,962 | 25,924 | 6,482 |
31
Table of Contents
With respect to the Performance-Based Restricted Stock under the Long-Term Incentive Award, target adjusted ROE for 2017 was 9.081% and target adjusted EPS for 2017 was $1.64 per share, which EPS target was based on an estimated 38,500,000 fully diluted shares. The adjusted ROE and EPS targets also reflected the anticipated impact of the $14.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt on atax-effected basis, which was known to the Compensation Committee at the time it set such targets in 2017. In February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company achieved adjusted ROE of approximately 10.22%, or 112.6% of target, resulting in each NEO earning 150.3% of the Target Shares tied to the ROE metric and adjusted EPS of $1.85 per share, or 112.8% of target, resulting in each applicable NEO earning 200% of the Target Shares tied to the EPS metric. In reaching its determination, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s actual net income used to calculate the performance results should also be adjusted to exclude the impact of a $23.1 million charge as a result of there-measurement of the Company’s deferred tax assets related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was signed into law in December 2017. As demonstrated in the table below, this resulted in each NEO earning 175% of the Target Shares with respect to the Performance-Based Restricted Stock.
Name | Target Shares of Performance-Based Restricted Stock | Actual Shares Earned Under Performance-Based Restricted Stock | Shares of Time-Based Restricted Stock | |||||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | 78,362 | 137,251 | 39,182 | |||||||||
William H. Lyon | 63,858 | 111,848 | 31,931 | |||||||||
Brian Doyle | 27,776 | 48,650 | 13,890 | |||||||||
Colin T. Severn | 25,246 | 44,219 | 12,624 | |||||||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | 12,962 | 22,702 | 6,482 |
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
The Company provides our management team and more senior executives, including our NEOs, with certain perquisites and other personal benefits that the Company believes are reasonable and consistent with the overall compensation program to better enable the Company to attract and retain employees for key positions. These perquisites include an annual automobile allowance of $6,000 ($500 per month) for 2017, which amount reflects an increase to the prior amount of $4,800 ($400 per month) effective as of March 6, 2017, payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll schedule, and Company-paid gasoline for use of one personal vehicle for business purposes. Our NEOs are also eligible to participate in an executive supplemental health insurance program, and additional benefits under a long-term disability program.
In addition, the Company has established a 401(k) retirement savings plan for its employees, including the NEOs, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements. Under the 401(k) plan, eligible employees may elect to contributepre-tax amounts, up to a statutorily prescribed limit, to the 401(k) plan. The Company believes that providing a vehicle fortax-preferred retirement savings through the 401(k) plan adds to the overall desirability of its executive compensation package and further incents the Company’s employees, including the NEOs, in accordance with the Company’s compensation policies. For 2017, the Company approved payment of matching contributions to each eligible participant’s plan account in an amount equal to 50% of each participant’s deferrals for 2017, up to a maximum of 3% of the participant’s eligible compensation during 2017.
Stock Ownership, Holding and Anti-Pledging Policies
In 2013, our Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for certain of our executives, including each of our NEOs (for so long as he or she continues to serve as an executive officer of the Company), requiring such NEOs to hold stock with a value equal to the following ownership threshold levels:
Position | Minimum Level of Stock Value Required to be Held | |
Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman | 4x Base Salary | |
Other NEOs | 2x Base Salary |
32
Table of Contents
Under the terms of the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, applicable NEOs must hold 100% of all shares received from the vesting, delivery or exercise of equity awards granted under the Company’s equity award plans (net of shares used to pay the exercise price of options or purchase price of other awards, all applicable withholding taxes and all applicable transaction costs) until the executive officer’s qualifying holdings meet or exceed the applicable salary multiple. In addition, absent a waiver by the Company or undue hardship, executive officers may not dispose of share holdings (by sale or otherwise) if the disposition would result in qualifying holdings falling below the applicable salary multiple. “Qualifying holdings” generally refer to shares of Class A Common Stock (i) held beneficially or of record by the executive officer, (ii) held by certain trusts or entities controlled by the executive officer, (iii) held by a 401(k) or other qualified pension or profit-sharing plan for the executive officer’s benefit and (iv) underlying vested restricted stock units. All of our NEOs are in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.
In addition, the Company has implemented a prohibition applicable to all of our directors and employees, including our NEOs, from engaging in short sales, placing limit orders that last more than 48 hours, purchasing shares on margin and pledging the Company’s securities as collateral to secure loans, subject to limited exceptions based on a demonstration of certain facts and circumstances, and, absent highly unusual circumstances, all such employees and directors are prohibited from entering into any hedging or similar transactions with respect to securities.
Employment Agreements and Severance Benefits
On March 23, 2015, California Lyon entered into new employment arrangements with certain of our NEOs, including new employment agreements (collectively, the “New Agreements”) with William H. Lyon, then Chief Executive Officer, and currently Executive Chairman, and Matthew R. Zaist, then President and Chief Operating Officer, and currently President and Chief Executive Officer. The New Agreements for these NEOs superseded and replaced the Company’s prior employment agreements with such NEOs, and the material terms of these new employment arrangements are described below.
Employment Agreements — William H. Lyon and Matthew R. Zaist
The New Agreements, each of which has an initial three year term that automatically renews for additional one year periods at the end of the then current term, provide for Messrs. Lyon and Zaist to receive a minimum base salary of $750,000 and $900,000 (based on base salaries in place during 2017), respectively, have an annual bonus targeted at a minimum of 150% of base salary and receive benefits generally available to other senior executives. Each executive’s annual base salary is subject to increase (but not decrease) from time to time, in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and if increased, shall not be decreased during the remainder of the term. The New Agreements also provide for Messrs. Lyon and Zaist to each be granted an option to purchase 120,000 shares of Company common stock, which the Compensation Committee approved with a grant date of April 1, 2015. The options were granted under the 2012 Plan and have an exercise price per share of $25.82, the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on March 31, 2015. Mr. Lyon’s option vests in three equal installments on each of March 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020, and Mr. Zaist’s option vests in a single installment on March 31, 2018, in each case, subject to continued employment with the Company.
Under the New Agreements, if Mr. Lyon’s or Zaist’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause,” as defined in the New Agreements, or by the executive for “good reason”, as described below, the executive is entitled to receive (i) a payment equal to the product of (A) 2.0 (or 3.0 in the event such termination occurs within 12 months following a change in control or within any period during which the Company or California Lyon is party to an agreement that would result in a change in control), multiplied by (B) the sum of the executive’s annual salary plus target cash bonus, based on the highest annual salary and annual target bonus during the term; (ii) any deferred and unpaid bonuses; (iii) a pro rata portion of the actual annual bonus earned for the fiscal year of termination; (iv) full acceleration of all equity awards and continued exercisability of options in accordance with their terms; and (v) continued healthcare coverage for up to 24 months. Each
33
Table of Contents
executive’s receipt of the foregoing severance benefits is conditioned on his execution of a general release in favor of the Company and compliance with the New Agreements’ restrictive covenants. The New Agreements also provide that the executives will be indemnified to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law.
Under the New Agreements, “good reason” will be deemed to have occurred, among other things, (i) if California Lyon materially breaches the employment agreement (including a material reduction in annual salary or reduction of the target cash bonus to less than 150% of the executive’s annual base salary), (ii) any material diminution in the executive’s title, responsibilities, duty and authority, (iii) upon the relocation (without the executive’s consent) of the executive’s or California Lyon’s principal place of business outside of Newport Beach, California, (iv) the provision by California Lyon to the executive of a notice ofnon-renewal, (v) any change in the person to whom the executive directly reports, except if to the Board, or (iv) with respect to Mr. Lyon, if the Company or California Lyon ceases to acquire or develop land or materially changes its business, or invests or engages in new businesses that compete with Lyon Management Group, Inc. and/or Lyon Capital Ventures, LLC, and with respect to Mr. Zaist, if someone other than William H. Lyon, General Lyon or himself is appointed to the position (even on a temporary or interim basis) of Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in each case as further described and qualified in the New Agreements.
In the event of a termination of the executive’s employment due to death or disability, the executive (or his estate) will be entitled to receive: (i) a lump sum payment equal to the amount of annual salary payable to the executive for the remainder of the then-current term; (ii) a lump sum payment equal to the amount of any previously earned deferred bonuses not previously paid; (iii) full acceleration of all equity awards and continued exercisability of options in accordance with their terms; and (iv) continued healthcare coverage for up to the later of 6 months or the expiration of the then-current term.
The Agreements also include standard confidentiality and invention assignment provisions,non-competition andnon-solicitation restrictions and mutualnon-disparagement obligations.
Employment Agreements for Brian W. Doyle, Colin T. Severn and Jason R. Liljestrom
A new form of employment agreement for Messrs. Doyle and Severn, effective as of April 1, 2013, replaced the agreement initially entered into with them effective September 1, 2012. On March 31, 2017, the Board appointed Mr. Doyle, the Company’s then-current Executive Vice President of Operations, to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. The Company did not enter into a new employment agreement with Mr. Doyle in connection with such promotion, and his existing employment agreement remained in place. Mr. Liljestrom entered into an employment agreement based on such new form, with such differences as described below, effective as of April 1, 2015. These agreements are individually referred to as an “Employment Agreement” and collectively referred to as the “Employment Agreements.”
The term of the Employment Agreement for Messrs. Doyle, Severn and Liljestrom automatically renew annually for aone-year period unless either party provides the other with written notice of nonrenewal at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the term.
Under the Employment Agreements, Messrs. Doyle, Severn and Liljestrom are entitled to minimum annual base salaries of $425,000, $350,000 and $325,000 (based on base salaries in place during 2017), respectively. Each executive’s annual base salary is subject to increase (but not decrease) from time to time, in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and if increased, shall not be decreased during the remainder of the term.
Messrs. Doyle, Severn and Liljestrom are entitled under the Employment Agreements to earn a cash bonus for each fiscal year under the senior executive bonus program established by the Compensation Committee, and shall participate at a level commensurate with his position at the Company. Annual target bonus levels will be established by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion.
34
Table of Contents
In the event of a termination of the executive’s employment due to death or disability, by the Company for “cause” or by the executive without “good reason,” the executive (or his estate) will be entitled to receive no benefits other than accrued but unpaid base salary and vacation benefits through the date of termination.
Under the Employment Agreements, in the event of the termination of the executive’s employment by the Company without “cause,” as defined in the employment agreements, or the termination by the executive of his employment for “good reason,” as defined below, the executive is entitled to receive (i) a payment equal to the product of (A) 1.0 multiplied by (B) the sum of the executive’s annual salary plus target cash bonus at the time of his termination of employment; (ii) any deferred and unpaid bonuses; (iii) in the case of Mr. Liljestrom, accelerated vesting in full of all restricted stock awards and options granted under the 2012 Plan and, in the case of Messrs. Doyle and Severn, if such termination occurs on or within 12 months following a change in control as defined in the employment agreement (and the executive’s respective equity awards are not assumed by the successor corporation), accelerated vesting in full of all restricted stock awards and options granted under the 2012 Plan; and (iv) reimbursement for certain health benefits coverage through the earlier of (A) the end of thesix-month period beginning on the first day of the month following the month of the executive’s termination of employment and (B) the date when the executive becomes covered under another employer’s group health or disability plan.
Each executive’s receipt of the foregoing severance benefits is conditioned on his execution of a general release in favor of the Company and his compliance with certain restrictive covenants. The Employment Agreements also provide that the executives will be indemnified to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law.
Under the Employment Agreements, “good reason” generally includes (i) a material breach of the employment agreement by the Company (including a material reduction in authority, duties or base salary), (ii) a relocation of the executive’s or the Company’s principal place of business outside a specified area, or, with respect to Messrs. Doyle and Severn, (iii) the occurrence of a “change in control”, as defined in the employment agreement.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code establishes a limitation on the deductibility of compensation payable in any particular tax year to our named executive officers. Section 162(m) provides that publicly-held companies cannot deduct compensation paid to certain named executive officers (other than, prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, our CFO) to the extent that such compensation exceeds $1 million per officer. Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, compensation that is “performance-based” compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) did not count toward the $1 million limit. As part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the ability to rely on this “qualified performance-based compensation” exception was eliminated and the limitation on deductibility was generally expanded to include all NEOs. Certain compensation awarded during 2017 may qualify for the “qualified performance-based compensation” exception under the Act’s grandfathering rules. Subject to the Act’s grandfathering rules, the Company may no longer take a deduction for any compensation paid to its NEOs in excess of $1 million.
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 280G of the Code disallows a tax deduction with respect to excess parachute payments to certain executives of companies that undergo a change in control. In addition, Section 4999 of the Code imposes a 20% excise tax on the individual with respect to the excess parachute payment. Parachute payments are those amounts of compensation linked to or triggered by a change in control and may include, but are not limited to, bonus payments, severance payments, certain fringe benefits, and payments and acceleration of vesting from long-term
35
Table of Contents
incentive plans including stock options and other equity-based compensation. Excess parachute payments are parachute payments that exceed a threshold determined under Section 280G of the Code based on the executive’s prior compensation. In approving certain compensation arrangements for the NEOs in the future, the Compensation Committee may consider all elements of the cost to the Company of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 280G of the Code. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its judgment, authorize compensation arrangements that could give rise to loss of deductibility under Section 280G of the Code and the imposition of excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code when it believes that such arrangements are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 409A of the Code requires that “nonqualified deferred compensation” be deferred and paid under plans or arrangements that satisfy the requirements of the statute with respect to the timing of deferral elections, timing of payments and certain other matters. Failure to satisfy these requirements can expose employees and other service providers to accelerated income tax liabilities, penalty taxes and interest on their vested compensation under such plans. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is the Company’s intention to design and administer its compensation and benefits plans and arrangements for all of its employees and other service providers, including the NEOs, so that they are either exempt from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section 409A of the Code.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to compensation for the 2017, 2016 and 2015 fiscal years earned by, awarded to or paid to the NEOs.
Name and Principal Position(1) | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Option Awards ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | 2017 | 851,923 | (5) | — | 2,115,792 | — | 2,386,025 | — | 24,559 | (6) | 5,378,299 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | 2016 | 650,000 | — | 1,500,000 | — | 1,085,500 | — | 24,366 | (5) | 3,259,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 640,385 | — | 1,329,307 | 1,416,404 | 760,500 | — | 23,373 | 4,169,969 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William H. Lyon | 2017 | 683,654 | (7) | — | 1,724,202 | — | 1,578,987 | — | 25,348 | (8) | 4,012,191 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Chairman | 2016 | 649,038 | — | 1,350,000 | — | 911,250 | — | 24,991 | 2,935,279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 744,231 | — | 1,407,482 | 1,465,679 | 877,500 | — | 23,673 | 4,518,565 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Doyle | 2017 | 417,308 | (9) | — | 749,988 | — | 1,139,888 | — | 35,037 | (10) | 2,342,221 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colin T. Severn | 2017 | 345,193 | (11) | — | 681,660 | — | 536,418 | — | 28,152 | (12) | 1,591,423 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2016 | 325,000 | — | 475,000 | — | 265,000 | — | 27,973 | 1,092,973 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 331,731 | — | 508,232 | — | 253,500 | — | 26,528 | 1,119,991 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jason Liljestrom | 2017 | 317,307 | (13) | — | 349,992 | — | 456,152 | — | 26,873 | (14) | 1,150,324 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | 2016 | 281,154 | — | 180,000 | — | 235,000 | — | 28,039 | 724,193 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | The positions reflect the titles for the NEOs in place as of December 31, 2017 which differ from the titles for one NEO as of the beginning of the 2017 year. For more information see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Executive Summary.” |
(2) | For 2017, represents the grant date fair value of the time-based restricted stock awards as well as the performance-based restricted stock awards granted pursuant to the 2017 Incentive Program under the 2012 Plan. For all NEOs, 67% of the total |
36
Table of Contents
award value (based on target achievement) is performance-based awards, and 33% of the total award value (based on target achievement) is time-based awards. With respect to the time-based restricted stock awards granted to each NEO, the grant date fair value of the awards shown is based on the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant as defined in the 2012 Plan, which is the closing stock price of our Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the preceding trading day, multiplied by the number of shares granted.One-third of the shares vest on each of March 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to each officer’s continued service through each such vesting date. With respect to the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to our NEOs, half of such award is subject to the achievement of apre-established ROE target for 2017 and the other half is subject to achievement of apre-established EPS target for 2017. The grant date fair value of these performance-based restricted stock awards shown is based on the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant as defined in the 2012 Plan, which is the closing stock price of our Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the preceding trading day, multiplied by the target number of shares granted.One-third of the earned shares vest on each of March 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to each NEO’s continued service through each such vesting date. The fair value of these performance-based restricted stock awards assuming achievement of the ROE and EPS goals, as applicable, at the maximum level (which may differ from two times’ target by up to the value of two shares due to rounding), are as follows: |
Fair Value Performance-Based Stock Awards Assuming Maximum Performance ($) | ||
Matthew R. Zaist | $2,821,064 | |
William H. Lyon | $2,298,936 | |
Brian Doyle | $1,000,000 | |
Colin T. Severn | $ 908,892 | |
Jason R. Liljestrom | $ 466,664 |
(3) | The amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of option grants computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The options were granted in connection with the Company’s entry into long-term employment contracts with each of William H. Lyon and Matthew R. Zaist. Mr. Lyon’s option vests in three equal installments on each of March 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020, and Mr. Zaist’s option vests in a single installment on March 31, 2018, in each case, subject to continued employment with the Company. |
(4) | The amounts shown for 2017 represent performance-based cash incentive payments earned for the 2017 fiscal year pursuant to the Company’s 2017 Incentive Program. Payment amounts for these annual cash incentive awards were based on the level of the Company’s achievement of apre-established Adjusted EBITDA target as well as the Strategic Component. |
(5) | The amount shown captures the increased base salary that went into effect as of March 6, 2017 for Mr. Zaist, as described above in “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Elements of Compensation-Base Salary ”. |
(6) | The amount reported in this All Other Compensation column for 2017 reflects a $5,770 automobile allowance (an increase from $4,800 per year to $6,000 per year took effect on March 6, 2017), $2,229 in fuel reimbursement, $6,360 in supplemental executive health insurance premiums, $2,250 in incremental long-term disability program premiums, and $7,950 in 401(k) matching contributions. |
(7) | Reflects Mr. Lyon’s annual base salary of $750,000 with $66,347 in foregone salary in 2017 resulting from unpaid time off. |
(8) | The amount reported in this All Other Compensation column for 2017 reflects a $5,770 automobile allowance (an increase from $4,800 per year to $6,000 per year took effect on March 6, 2017), $68 in fuel reimbursement, $9,510 in supplemental executive health insurance premiums, $2,250 in incremental long-term disability program premiums, and $7,750 in 401(k) matching contributions. |
(9) | The amount shown captures the increased base salary that went into effect as of March 6, 2017 for Mr. Doyle, as described above in “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Elements of Compensation-Base Salary ”. |
(10) | The amount reported in this All Other Compensation column for 2017 reflects a $5,770 automobile allowance (an increase from $4,800 per year to $6,000 per year took effect on March 6, 2017), $4,757 in fuel reimbursement, $9,510 in supplemental executive health insurance premiums, $2,250 in incremental long-term disability program premiums, and $7,950 in 401(k) matching contributions. |
(11) | The amount shown captures the increased base salary that went into effect as of March 6, 2017 for Mr. Severn, as described above in “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Elements of Compensation-Base Salary ”. |
(12) | The amount reported in this All Other Compensation column for 2017 reflects a $5,770 automobile allowance (an increase from $4,800 per year to $6,000 per year took effect on March 6, 2017), $2,672 in fuel reimbursement, $9,510 in supplemental executive health insurance premiums, $2,250 in incremental long-term disability program premiums, and $7,950 in 401(k) matching contributions. |
(13) | The amount shown captures the increased base salary that went into effect as of March 6, 2017 for Mr. Liljestrom, as described above in “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Elements of Compensation-Base Salary ”. |
(14) | The amount reported in this All Other Compensation column for 2017 reflects a $5,770 automobile allowance (an increase from $4,800 per year to $6,000 per year took effect on March 6, 2017), $1,473 in fuel reimbursement, $9,510 in supplemental executive health insurance premiums, $2,170 in incremental long-term disability program premiums, and $7,950 in 401(k) matching contributions. |
37
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth summary information regarding all grants of plan-based awards made to our NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non- |
Estimated Future Payouts Under | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(3) (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Approval Date | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | — | — | $ | 637,500 | $ | 1,700,000 | $ | 3,400,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/24/2017 | 2/17/2017 | — | — | — | 29,386 | 78,362 | 156,724 | 39,182 | 2,115,792 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William H. Lyon | — | — | $ | 421,875 | $ | 1,125,000 | $ | 2,250,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/24/2017 | 2/17/2017 | — | — | — | 23,946 | 63,858 | 127,718 | 31,931 | 1,724,202 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Doyle | — | — | $ | 318,750 | $ | 850,000 | $ | 1,700,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/24/2017 | 2/17/2017 | — | — | — | 10,416 | 27,776 | 55,554 | 13,890 | 749,988 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colin T. Severn | — | — | $ | 150,000 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 800,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/24/2017 | 2/17/2017 | — | — | — | 9,466 | 25,246 | 50,494 | 12,624 | 681,660 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | — | — | $ | 121,875 | $ | 325,000 | $ | 650,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/24/2017 | 2/17/2017 | — | — | — | 4,860 | 12,962 | 25,924 | 6,482 | 349,992 | (4) |
(1) | Represents threshold, target and maximum payouts under the cash short-term incentive payout component of the 2017 Incentive Program. The NEOs were eligible to earn cash incentive payouts for 2017 based 75% on the Company’s achievement of apre-established Adjusted EBITDA target and 25% on strategic objectives. Threshold amounts were set at 37.5% of each NEO’s target opportunity, target amounts were set at 100% of each NEO’s target opportunity, and maximum amounts were set at 200% of each NEO’s target opportunity. For a description of the short-term cash incentive payout component of the 2017 Incentive Program, see “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Elements of Compensation-2017 Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation .” |
(2) | Represents threshold, target and maximum shares that could be earned under the performance-based restricted stock award component of the 2017 Incentive Program. With respect to each NEO, half of the total of such performance-based restricted stock award component is based on the Company’s achievement of each of apre-established ROE target for fiscal year 2017 and the other half is based on apre-established EPS target for fiscal year 2017. With respect to all such awards,one-third of the earned shares vest on each of March 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to each officer’s continued service through each such vesting date. The time-based restricted stock award component of the 2017 Incentive Program is reflected in the column to the right titled “All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units.” For a description of the long-term equity component of the 2017 Incentive Program, see “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Elements of Compensation-Long-Term Equity Based Compensation .” |
(3) | Represents the time-based restricted stock award component of the 2017 Incentive Program.One-third of the shares underlying such awards vest on each of March 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to each officer’s continued service through each such vesting date. |
(4) | The value of the restricted stock awards shown represents the grant date fair value as prescribed under FASB ASC Topic 718, based on the fair market value of the Class A Common Stock on the date of grant, which was $18.00 per share (which is the closing stock price on the NYSE for the preceding trading day, in accordance with the 2012 Plan), multiplied by the target number of shares granted with respect to the performance-based restricted stock awards and the number of shares granted with respect to the time-based restricted stock awards. |
38
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End
The following table sets forth summary information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs at December 31, 2017.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of securities underlying unexercised options exercisable (#) | Number of securities underlying unexercised options unexercisable (#)(1) | Option exercise price ($) | Option expiration date | Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)(1) | Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(1) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | — | 120,000 | 25.82 | 3/31/2025 | 105,731 | 3,074,657 | 137,251 | 3,991,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
169,697 |
(3) | — | 8.66 | 9/30/2022 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
William H. Lyon | — | 120,000 | 25.82 | 3/31/2025 | 94,642 | 2,752,189 | 111,848 | 3,252,540 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian W. Doyle | 77,819 | — | 8.66 | 9/30/2022 | 55,836 | 1,623,711 | 48,650 | 1,414,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colin T. Severn | 28,364 | — | 8.66 | 9/30/2022 | 34,863 | 1,013,817 | 44,219 | 1,285,889 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | — | — | — | — | 16,476 | 479,122 | 22,702 | 660,175 |
(1) | The table below shows on agrant-by-grant basis the vesting schedules relating to the unvested stock option and restricted stock awards that are represented in the above table. |
39
Table of Contents
The following table provides the vesting schedule with respect to each of the restricted stock awards and stock options awards set forth in the table above.
Name | Grant Date | Award Type | Vesting Schedule | |||
Matthew R. Zaist | 02/25/2015 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that 25,499 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 8,499 shares vested on 3/1/2016, 8,500 shares vested on 3/1/2017 and 8,500 shares vest on 3/1/2018. | |||
02/25/2015 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 9,239 shares vested on each of 3/1/2016 and 3/1/2017 and 9,239 vest on 3/1/2018. | ||||
04/01/2015 | Non-qualified Stock Option | 120,000 options vest on 3/31/2018. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that 46,198 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 15,399 shares vested on 3/1/2017, 15,399 shares vest on 3/1/2018 and 15,400 shares vest on 3/1/2019. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 9,006 shares vested on 3/1/2017, 9,006 shares vest on 3/1/2018, and 9,005 shares vest on 3/1/2019. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that 137,251 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 45,750 shares vest on 3/1/2018, 45,751 shares vest on 3/1/2019 and 45,750 shares vest on 3/1/2020. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 13,061 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019 and 13,060 shares vest on 3/1/2020. | ||||
William H. Lyon | 02/25/2015 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that 26,999 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 8,999 shares vested on 3/1/2016, 9,000 shares vested on 3/1/2017, and 8,999 shares vest on 3/1/2018. |
40
Table of Contents
Name | Grant Date | Award Type | Vesting Schedule | |||
02/25/2015 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 9,783 shares vested on 3/1/2016, 9,782 shares vested on 3/1/2017 and 9782 shares vest on 3/1/2018. | ||||
04/01/2015 | Non-qualified Stock Option | 40,000 options vest on each of 3/31/2018, 3/31/2019 and 3/31/2020. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that 41,578 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 13,859 shares vested on 3/1/2017, 13,859 shares vest on 3/1/2018, and 13,860 shares vest on 3/1/2019. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 8,105 shares vested on 3/1/2017 and 8,105 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that 111,848 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 37,284 shares vest on 3/1/2018, and 37,282 vest on each of 3/1/2019 and 3/1/2020. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 10,644 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019 and 10,643 shares vest on 3/1/2020. | ||||
Brian W. Doyle | 02/19/2015 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that 9,374 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 3,125 shares vested on 3/1/2016, 3,124 shares vested on 3/1/2017 and 3,125 shares vest on 3/1/2018. | |||
02/19/2015 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 3,397 shares vested on each of 3/1/2016 and 3/1/2017 and 3,396 shares vest on 3/1/2018. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that 14,751 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 4,916 shares vested on 3/1/2017, 4,917 shares vest on 3/1/2018, and 4,918 shares vest on 3/1/2019. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 5,404 shares vested on 3/1/2017, and 5,403 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019. |
41
Table of Contents
Name | Grant Date | Award Type | Vesting Schedule | |||
08/09/2016 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 14,784 shares vest on 8/9/2018. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that 48,650 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 16,217 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019, and 16,216 shares vest on 3/1/2020. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 4,630 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018, 3/1/2019 and 3/1/2020. | ||||
Colin T. Severn | 02/25/2015 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that 9,749 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 3,249 vested on 3/1/2016, 3,250 shares vested on 3/1/2017, and 3,250 shares vest on 3/1/2018. | |||
02/25/2015 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 3,533 shares vested on 3/1/2016, 3,532 shares vested on 3/1/2017 and 3,532 shares vest on 3/1/2018. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that 14,629 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 4,876 shares vested on 3/1/2017, 4,876 shares vest on 3/1/2018, and 4,877 shares vest on 3/1/2019. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 2,852 shares vested on 3/1/2017, 2,852 shares vest on 3/1/2018, and 2,851 shares vest on 3/1/2019. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that 44,219 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 14,740 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019 and 14,739 shares vest on 3/1/2020. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 4,208 shares vested on each of 3/1/2018, 3/1/2019, and 3/1/2020. |
42
Table of Contents
Name | Grant Date | Award Type | Vesting Schedule | |||
Jason R. Liljestrom | 02/19/2015 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that 2,499 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 833 shares vested on each of 3/1/2016 and 3/1/2017 and 833 shares vest on 3/1/2018. | |||
02/19/2015 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 906 shares vested on each of 3/1/2016 and 3/1/2017, and 905 shares vest on 3/1/2018. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that 5,900 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 1,967 shares vested on 3/1/2017, 1,967 shares vest on 3/1/2018, and 1,966 shares vest on 3/1/2019. | ||||
03/22/2016 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 2,162 shares vest on 3/1/2017 and 2,161 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Performance-Based Restricted Stock | In February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that 22,702 shares were earned and all unearned shares, if any, were forfeited. With respect to the earned shares, 7,568 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019, and 7,566 shares vest on 3/1/2020. | ||||
02/24/2017 | Time-Based Restricted Stock | 2,161 shares vest on each of 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2019 and 2,160 shares vest on 3/3/2020. |
(2) | Represents the closing stock price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 29, 2017, the last trading day of the 2017 fiscal year, of $29.08 per share, multiplied by the number of shares, or unearned shares, as applicable, that have not vested. |
(3) | A portion of the securities represented by this figure are held by a limited liability company of which Mr. Zaist is a manager and in which Mr. Zaist’s trust holds a controlling interest. |
43
Table of Contents
Options Exercised and Stock Vested
The following table summarizes the option exercises and vesting of restricted stock awards for our NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of securities acquired on exercise (#) | Value realized on exercise ($) | Number of shares acquired on vesting (#) | Value realized on vesting ($)(1) | ||||||||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | — | — | 51,552 | 950,104 | ||||||||||||
William H. Lyon | — | — | 50,154 | 924,339 | ||||||||||||
Brian W. Doyle | — | — | 20,499 | 377,797 | ||||||||||||
Colin T. Severn | — | — | 17,383 | 320,369 | ||||||||||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | — | — | 5,867 | 108,129 |
(1) | Represents the closing stock price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the preceding trading day of the date of vesting, multiplied by the number of shares that have vested. |
The NEOs did not participate in or have account balances in qualified or nonqualified defined benefit plans sponsored by the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The NEOs did not participate in or have account balances in nonqualified defined contribution plans or other nonqualified deferred compensation plans maintained by the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
44
Table of Contents
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The following table summarizes the potential payments to our NEOs upon a “change in control” alone without a qualifying termination, upon executive’s termination of employment as a result of death or disability, upon a “qualifying termination” of employment (a termination by us without cause or the executive’s resignation for good reason), or upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control. In the event an NEO is terminated for cause, by the NEO for any reason other than good reason, or, in the case of Messrs. Doyle, Severn and Liljestrom, due to death or disability, such NEO is not entitled to any severance payments or benefits. The amounts shown assume that the triggering event was effective as of December 31, 2017, and are only estimates of the amounts that would be paid to such NEOs. The actual amounts to be paid can be determined only at the time of such termination of employment or other triggering event. The amounts shown do not include any amounts for the actual 2017 cash bonus amounts as such amounts would be deemed fully earned as of December 31, 2017. Further, the amounts shown are based on the employment agreements in place as of December 31, 2017 and equity award agreements outstanding as of such date, the assumed date of the triggering event.
Name, Type of Termination | Cash Severance ($)(1) | Equity Acceleration ($)(2) | Benefits Continuation ($)(3) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
Matthew R. Zaist | ||||||||||||||||
CIC (no Qualifying Termination) | — | 515,851 | — | 515,851 | ||||||||||||
Death or Disability | 225,000 | 7,457,117 | 9,481 | 7,691,598 | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination (no CIC) | 5,200,000 | 7,457,117 | 37,923 | 12,695,040 | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination + CIC | 7,800,000 | 7,457,117 | 37,923 | 15,295,040 | ||||||||||||
William H. Lyon | ||||||||||||||||
CIC (no Qualifying Termination) | — | 546,152 | — | 546,152 | ||||||||||||
Death or Disability | 187,500 | 6,395,929 | 13,701 | 6,597,130 | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination (no CIC) | 3,750,000 | 6,395,929 | 54,802 | 10,200,731 | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination + CIC | 5,625,000 | 6,395,929 | 54,802 | 12,075,731 | ||||||||||||
Brian W. Doyle | ||||||||||||||||
CIC (no Qualifying Termination) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Death or Disability | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination (no CIC) | 1,275,000 | — | 13,701 | 1,288,701 | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination + CIC | 1,275,000 | 3,038,453 | 13,701 | 4,327,154 | ||||||||||||
Colin T. Severn | ||||||||||||||||
CIC (no Qualifying Termination) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Death or Disability | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination (no CIC) | 750,000 | — | 13,701 | 763,701 | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination + CIC | 750,000 | 2,299,706 | 13,701 | 3,063,407 | ||||||||||||
Jason R. Liljestrom | ||||||||||||||||
CIC (no Qualifying Termination) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Death or Disability | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination (no CIC) | 650,000 | 1,139,297 | 13,701 | 1,802,998 | ||||||||||||
Qualifying Termination + CIC | 650,000 | 1,139,297 | 13,701 | 1,802,998 |
(1) | In the event of a “qualifying termination” of employment, represents an amount equal to: for each of Messrs. William H. Lyon and Zaist, two (2) times the sum of his annual base salary plus target bonus for 2017; for each of Messrs. Doyle, Severn and Liljestrom, the sum of his annual salary plus target cash bonus for 2017. With respect to Messrs. William H. Lyon and Zaist, in the event of a qualifying termination occurring within one year following a change of control, or any period during which the Company is party to an agreement, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by which would result in the |
45
Table of Contents
occurrence of a change of control, represents an amount equal to three (3) times the sum of his annual base salary plus target bonus for 2017. In the event of a termination of the employment of Messrs. William H. Lyon or Zaist due to death or disability, represents an amount equal to his base salary for the remaining three (3) month period through March 31, 2018. |
(2) | Represents the intrinsic value of the accelerated vesting of all unvested stock options and restricted stock awards, based on the closing stock price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 29, 2017, the last trading day of our common stock for fiscal year 2017, of $29.08 per share. In accordance with the terms of the executive’s employment agreement and/or equity award agreement, as applicable, upon a termination of the employment of each of William H. Lyon or Mr. Zaist by the Company without cause or by him for good reason, whether or not following a change of control of the Company, or upon a change of control with respect to certain historical restricted stock awards, in each case he is entitled to accelerated vesting in full of all stock options and restricted stock awards granted, as applicable, with such shares of restricted stock for performance-based awards to be the target number of shares if such triggering event occurs prior to the Compensation Committee’s determination of the Company’s achievement of its performance target for the period. Upon a termination of Messrs. Doyle or Severn’s employment by the Company without cause or by him for good reason, in either case on or within twelve months following a change in control of the Company (and the executive’s respective equity awards are not assumed by the successor corporation), he is entitled to accelerated vesting in full of all stock options and restricted stock awards granted, as applicable, with such shares of restricted stock for performance-based awards to be the target number of shares if such triggering event occurs prior to the Compensation Committee’s determination of the Company’s achievement of its performance target for the period. Upon a termination of Mr. Liljestrom’s employment by the Company without cause or by him for good reason, whether or not following a change in control of the Company, he is entitled to accelerated vesting in full of all outstanding restricted stock and stock option awards granted, as applicable, with such shares of restricted stock for performance-based awards to be the target number of shares if such triggering event occurs prior to the Compensation Committee’s determination of the Company’s achievement of its performance target for the period. In each of the cases above, with respect to the 2017 performance-based restricted stock awards, the table above reflects actual attainment at approximately 175% of target, given that the assumed triggering event is deemed to take place on December 31, 2017, the last date of the performance period. |
(3) | Represents the value of the continuation of health benefits for the following number of months: twenty-four (24) months for each of Messrs. William H. Lyon and Zaist upon a qualifying termination of employment, or six (6) months for such individuals if termination due to death or disability, and six (6) months for each of Messrs. Doyle, Severn and Liljestrom upon a qualifying termination. |
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information for 2017:
• | The median annual total compensation of all employees of our Company (other than our CEO) as of December 31, 2017 (our “Median Employee”), was $98,244. |
• | The annual total compensation of our CEO, Matthew R. Zaist, was $5,393,908. |
Accordingly, for 2017 the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to that of our Median Employee was54.9-to-1. This ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K.
The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s Annual Total Compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
46
Table of Contents
For purposes of calculating the pay ratio, we determined the annual total compensation of our CEO and our Median Employee as follows:
• | As of December 31, 2017, our employee population consisted of 642 employees, including any full-time, part-time, and reduced-full time employees employed on that date. |
• | To find the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (other than our CEO), we used wages from our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on FormW-2 for calendar year 2017. In making this determination, we annualized the total compensation of 141 permanent employees who were employed on December 31, 2017, but did not work for us the entire year. No full-time equivalent adjustments were made for part-time or reduced-full time employees. We identified the median employee by ranking from lowest to highest the amount of total annual compensation based on the methodology set forth above. |
• | After identifying our Median Employee based on the methodology summarized above, we calculated the annual total compensation of our CEO and our Median Employee using the same methodology that we use to calculate the annual total compensation of our NEOs as set forth in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table included elsewhere in this proxy statement, except that, in order to better reflect our employee compensation practices, the annual total compensation for our CEO and for our Median Employee includes the dollar value ofnon-discriminatory health and welfare benefit contributions made by the Company, which are not required to be reported as compensation for our CEO in the Summary Compensation Table. The difference between our CEO’s annual total compensation reported in the “Total” column of the 2017 Summary Compensation Table and the annual total compensation set forth above represents health and welfare benefit contributions (in an amount equal to $15,609). |
Director Compensation Program. The Compensation Committee is responsible for the periodic review of fees and benefits paid tonon-employee directors and for submitting any recommended changes to the Board. Our management directors do not receive additional compensation for their service as directors. Ournon-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer, payable in equal quarterly installments, as well as an equity award retainer, consisting of restricted shares of our Class A Common Stock vesting in equal quarterly installments following the grant date. The equity portion of the annual retainer for Mr. Barr was paid in cash. The amount of the annual cash retainer for 2017 was $65,000. The grant date fair value of the annual equity retainer for 2017 was $100,000. Mr. Hunt, as the lead independent director, receives an additional annual cash retainer and annual equity award retainer, on the same payment and vesting schedule as the other retainers. In 2017, the amount of this additional cash and equity retainer were $50,000 and $25,000, respectively. In addition, for 2017, the chairperson of the Audit Committee receives a fee of $25,000 per year, payable $6,250 per calendar quarter, to serve in such capacity, the chairperson of the Compensation Committee receives a fee of $25,000 per year, payable $6,250 per calendar quarter, to serve in such capacity, the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives a fee of $15,000 per year, payable $3,750 per calendar quarter, to serve in such capacity, and other members of such committees receive a fee of $10,000 per year, payable $2,500 per calendar quarter, per committee for service on such committees. All of the amounts for the components of director compensation listed above were the same as those in place during 2016, with the exception of the annual equity retainer amount, which increased by $10,000, and committee member fees, which increased by $5,000.
For 2017, the Board permitted eachnon-employee director, other than Mr. Barr, to elect to receive his or her annual cash fees, including the annual retainer and fees for committee service, in the form of restricted stock pursuant to each director’s election, so long as the election was for all of such cash fees. For 2017, Messrs. Hunt, Niemann and Harrison, and Ms. Schell, each elected to receive their cash fees in cash, and Mr. Ammerman elected to receive his entire cash fees in restricted shares.
47
Table of Contents
In connection with the 2017 compensation programs and elections described above, the Company granted the following restricted shares of our Class A Common Stock to each of our eligiblenon-employee directors: 11,666 shares to Mr. Ammerman, 6,944 shares to Mr. Hunt, 5,555 shares to Mr. Niemann, 5,555 shares to Ms. Schell and 5,555 shares to Mr. Harrison, and in each case vesting in equal quarterly installments and to vest in full on March 1, 2018.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for ournon-employee directors, requiring such directors to hold stock with a value equal to two times the director’s annual retainer value as of the most recently completed fiscal year (both cash and equity award retainers). Under the terms of the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, directors must hold 100% of all shares received from the vesting, delivery or exercise of equity awards granted under the Company’s equity award plans (net of shares used to pay the exercise price of options or purchase price of other awards, all applicable withholding taxes and all applicable transaction costs) until the directors’ qualifying holdings meet or exceed the applicable retainer multiple. In addition, absent a waiver by the Company or undue hardship, directors may not dispose of share holdings (by sale or otherwise) if the disposition would result in qualifying holdings falling below the applicable retainer multiple. “Qualifying holdings” generally refer to shares of Class A Common Stock (i) held beneficially or of record by the director, (ii) held by certain trusts or entities controlled by the director, (iii) held by a 401(k) or other qualified pension or profit-sharing plan for the director’s benefit and (iv) underlying vested restricted stock units. Each of ournon-employee directors is in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines.
2017 Director Compensation. The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1)(2) | Total ($) | |||||||||
Douglas K. Ammerman | 23,750 | 210,000 | 233,750 | |||||||||
Michael Barr(3) | 162,500 | — | 162,500 | |||||||||
Gary H. Hunt | 146,250 | 125,000 | 271,250 | |||||||||
Matthew R. Niemann | 106,250 | 100,000 | 206,250 | |||||||||
Lynn Carlson Schell | 71,250 | 100,000 | 171,250 | |||||||||
Thomas F. Harrison | 83,750 | 100,000 | 183,750 |
(1) | Represents: (i) a grant of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $210,000 for Mr. Ammerman, representing the aggregate amount of the annual equity retainer for such director and the annual cash retainer and cash fees for committee service, pursuant to the director’s election to receive such cash retainer/fees in the form of equity; (ii) a grant of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $100,000 per award for each Messrs. Harrison and Niemann, and Ms. Schell, representing the aggregate amount of the annual equity retainer for such directors, and (iii) a grant of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $125,000 for Mr. Hunt, representing the aggregate amount of the annual equity retainer for Mr. Hunt as well as the additional annual equity retainer for his service as lead independent director. The grant date fair value is determined using the fair market value per share of Class A Common Stock as of the grant date (which date was February 24, 2017) in accordance with the 2012 Plan, which is the closing stock price of our Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the preceding trading day. Each of the restricted stock awards granted to ournon-employee directors in 2017 vest in equal quarterly installments on each of June 1, September 1 and December 1, 2017 and March 1, 2018, in each case subject to the individualnon-employee director’s continued service on the Board through such date. |
(2) | None of thenon-employee directors held any vested or unvested stock options as of the end of our 2017 fiscal year. The number of shares of unvested restricted stock held by each of ournon-employee directors, as applicable, as of the end of our 2017 fiscal year is as follows: Mr. Ammerman—2,916 shares; Mr. Hunt—1,736 shares; Mr. Niemann—1,388 shares; Ms. Schell—1,388 shares; Mr. Harrison—1,388 shares. |
(3) | Mr. Barr’s fees are paid to a fund affiliated with Paulson. |
48
Table of Contents
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Matthew R. Niemann, Chairman
Thomas F. Harrison
Lynn Carlson Schell
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes information about our equity securities that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our equity compensation plans, as of December 31, 2017. Thenon-compensatory warrant to purchase 1,907,550 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock issued in connection with the prepackaged joint plan of reorganization in February 2012 is not included in the table below.
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (a) | Weighted- Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b) | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) (c) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 592,778 | (1) | $ | 15.61 | (2) | 1,604,258 | (3) | |||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | $ | — | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | 592,778 | $ | 15.61 | 1,604,258 |
(1) | Represents outstanding options to purchase shares of Class A common stock of the Company. |
(2) | Represents the weighted average exercise price of each of the 592,778 outstanding options to purchase shares of Class A common stock of the Company. |
(3) | Represents the number of securities remaining available for issuance under the 2012 Plan as of December 31, 2017. |
49
Table of Contents
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of our Board has selected KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018, and the Board has directed that management submit the selection of independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. A representative of KPMG is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Stockholder ratification of the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accountants is not required by our bylaws or otherwise. However, the Board is submitting the selection of KPMG to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accountant at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF KPMG AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018.
Fees Incurred for Services by Principal Accountant
The fees billed for professional services provided by KPMG in fiscal years 2017 and 2016 were:
Type of Fees | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 1,693,574 | $ | 1,036,385 | ||||
Audit Related Fees | — | — | ||||||
Tax Fees | 280,253 | 234,672 | ||||||
All Other Fees | — | 100,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Fees | $ | 1,973,827 | $ | 1,371,057 | ||||
|
|
|
|
In the above table, in accordance with the definitions of the SEC, “Audit Fees” include fees for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form10-K, review of the unaudited financial statements included in its quarterly reports on Form10-Q, comfort letters, consents, assistance with documents filed with the SEC, and accounting and reporting consultation in connection with the audit and/or quarterly reviews, “Tax Fees” include fees related to preparation and filing of the Company’s U.S. federal and state tax returns, as well as audit support, and “Other Fees” include fees related to certain general corporate matters.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires advance approval of all audit, audit-related, tax services, and other services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy provides forpre-approval by the Audit Committee of specifically defined audit andnon-audit services. Unless the specific service has been previouslypre-approved with respect to that year, the Audit Committee must approve the permitted service before the independent auditors are engaged to perform it.
The Audit Committee considered the compatibility of the provision of other services by its registered public accountant with the maintenance of their independence. The Audit Committee approved all audit andnon-audit services provided by KPMG, as applicable, in 2017 and 2016.
50
Table of Contents
Our Audit Committee issued the following report for inclusion in this proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.
1. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 with management of William Lyon Homes and with William Lyon Homes’ independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, including the audit of internal controls over financial reporting of William Lyon Homes.
2. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP those matters required by Statement on Accounting Standards No. 1301, as amended, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”).
3. The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP required by the PCAOB regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning the accountant’s independence, and has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence from William Lyon Homes and its management. The Audit Committee has also considered whether KPMG LLP’s provision of tax compliance and consulting services to William Lyon Homes is compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.
4. Based on the review and discussions referenced to in paragraphs 1 through 3 above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 be included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for that year for filing with the SEC.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE |
Douglas K Ammerman, Chairman |
Matthew R. Niemann |
Lynn Carlson Schell |
51
Table of Contents
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Policies and Procedures for Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
Our Board has adopted a written statement of policy for the evaluation of and the approval, disapproval and monitoring of transactions involving us and a “related party.” For purposes of this policy, a “related party” includes our executive officers, directors and director nominees, stockholders owning five percent or more of our voting securities, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons sharing the same household as such person, or any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position, or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest. For purposes of this policy, a “related party transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which the Company was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Our related party transactions policy generally requires, among other things, that any related party transaction be evaluated and approved or ratified by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and that management present to the Audit Committee any proposed related party transaction, including all relevant facts and circumstances thereto and provide periodic updates to the Audit Committee regarding such transactions. Our policy further provides that no director may participate in approval of a related party transaction for which he or she is a related party.
Indemnification Agreements and Liability Insurance Policy
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors pursuant to which the Company has agreed to indemnify such executive officers and directors against liability incurred by them by reason of their services as an executive officer or director to the fullest extent allowable under applicable law. We also provide liability insurance for each director and officer for certain losses arising from claims or charges made against them while acting in their capacities as our directors or officers.
Transactions with Related Persons
We describe below transactions and series of similar transactions that have occurred since the beginning of the 2017 fiscal year to which we were a party or will be a party in which:
• | the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and |
• | a director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our voting securities or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. |
Land Acquisition Transactions
In November 2017, William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation (“California Lyon”) and wholly owned subsidiary of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (“Parent” and together with California Lyon, the “Company”), entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Oceanside PSA”) with an entity (“Oceanside Seller”) managed by an affiliate of Paulson & Co., Inc. (“Paulson”), which provides for the purchase of certain real property from the Seller located in Oceanside, California for a proposed residential homebuilding development (the “St. Cloud Transaction”). The PSA provides for an overall purchase price of $22,844,000, including an aggregate deposit amount of $1,160,000 (the “Deposit”), which Deposit was paid and becamenon-refundable in December 2017. The balance of the purchase price was paid in connection with closing of the St. Cloud Transaction in March 2018. WLH Recovery Acquisition LLC, which is affiliated with, and managed by affiliates of, Paulson, previously held over 5% of Parent’s outstanding Class A common stock, which stock was sold in its entirety in September 2017. One of the current members of Parent’s board of directors currently serves as Portfolio Manager for the Paulson Real Estate Funds, which are affiliates of Paulson, and is a Partner in
52
Table of Contents
Paulson. The Company believes that the St. Cloud Transaction was on terms no less favorable than it would have agreed to with unrelated third parties. The St. Cloud Transaction was approved by the Audit Committee of Parent’s Board and by the full Board.
In August 2016, the Company acquired certain lots within a master planned community located in Aurora, Colorado (the “Aurora Transaction”), for an overall purchase price of approximately $9.3 million, from an entity managed by an affiliate of Paulson. A portion of the acquisition price for the lots was paid in the form of a seller note with a principal amount of approximately $3.0 million (the “Seller Note”). The Seller Note was paid off in its entirety in August 2017. The interest incurred under the Seller Note from inception to the full repayment date was approximately $210,000. The Company believes that the Aurora Transaction, including the terms of the Seller Note, was on terms no less favorable than it would have agreed to with unrelated parties.
Preemptive Rights Purchase Agreement
During the fourth quarter of 2017, Parent issued an aggregate of 5,113,473 shares of Class A Common Stock, pursuant to the settlement of the prepaid stock purchase contracts (the “Purchase Contracts”) that comprised part of the Company’s previously outstanding 1,150,000 tangible equity units (the “TEUs”). The Purchase Contracts provided that, unless settled earlier at the holder’s option, each Purchase Contract would automatically settle on December 1, 2017 (the “Mandatory Settlement Date”) and the Company would deliver a certain number of shares of Class A Common Stock on the Mandatory Settlement Date, based upon the applicable settlement rate and applicable market value of the Class A Common Stock. On November 27, 2017, Parent issued 670,811 shares of Class A Common Stock to certain holders who elected for early settlement of their Purchase Contracts, and Parent issued the balance to the remaining holders on the Mandatory Settlement Date, for an aggregate issuance of 5,113,473 shares of Class A Common Stock, which reflected the minimum number of shares of Class A Common Stock that were issuable by Parent under the Purchase Contracts (as adjusted for fractional shares). The TEUs were initially issued by the Company through a public offering in late 2014 as a component of the financing of the Company’s acquisition of Polygon Northwest Homes in August 2014, which now operates as the Company’s Washington and Oregon divisions.
Pursuant to the preemptive rights granted under the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, upon the issuances of the shares of Class A Common Stock underlying the TEUs, Lyon Shareholder 2012, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and the sole holder (the “Class B Holder”) of the Company’s Class B Common Stock, had the right to purchase up to the number of additional shares of Class B Common Stock needed to maintain its voting power at the time of such issuances of Class A Common Stock. On December 14, 2017, in connection with the exercise of such preemptive rights by the Class B Holder, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the Class B Holder. The Purchase Agreement provided for the purchase by the Class B Holder from the Company of 1,003,510 newly issued shares of Class B Common Stock, subject to the terms and conditions specified therein, which shares were issued and sold to the Class B Holder, and are beneficially owned by William H. Lyon, the Company’s Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board of Directors. The aggregate consideration received by the Company for the Class B Common Stock was $29.9 million.
Certain Family Relationships
William H. Lyon, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman, is the son of General William Lyon. General William Lyon is currently the Company’s Chairman Emeritus, and served as a member of the Board until February 17, 2017.
53
Table of Contents
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Executive officers, directors and greater thanten-percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and the written representations from certain of the reporting persons that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, all executive officers, directors and greater thanten-percent beneficial owners complied with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a), except that on May 12, 2017, GMT Capital Corp. and certain of its affiliated entities and individuals (including Bay Resource Partners, L.P., Bay II Resource Partners, L.P., Bay Resource Partners Offshore Master Fund, L.P., and Thomas Claugus) (collectively, “GMT Capital”) filed a Form 4 one day late with respect to a sale transaction.
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations
Proposals Pursuant to Rule 14a-8. Pursuant toRule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement and for consideration at our next annual meeting of stockholders. To be eligible for inclusion in the 2019 proxy statement, your proposal must be received by us no later than December 13, 2018, and must otherwise comply withRule 14a-8. While our Board will consider stockholder proposals, we reserve the right to omit from the proxy statement stockholder proposals that we are not required to include under the Exchange Act, includingRule 14a-8.
Proposals and Nominations Pursuant to Our Bylaws. Under our bylaws, in order to nominate a director or bring any other business before the stockholders at the 2018 annual meeting that will not be included in our proxy statement, you must notify us in writing and such notice must be received by us no earlier than January 24, 2019 and no later than February 23, 2019. For proposals not made in accordance with Rule14a-8, you must comply with specific procedures set forth in our bylaws and the nomination or proposal must contain the specific information required by our bylaws. You may write to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660, to deliver the notices discussed above and to request a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates pursuant to the bylaws.
Householding of Proxy Materials
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
This year, a number of banks and brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be householding our proxy materials. A single proxy statement will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement and annual report, please notify your bank or broker, direct your written request to William Lyon Homes, 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660 Attn: Investor Relations, or contact Investor Relations by telephone
54
Table of Contents
at310-622-8223. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy statement at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their bank or broker.
By Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
Jason R. Liljestrom |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
55
Table of Contents
Appendix A
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP ANDNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Adjusted EBITDA means net income available to common stockholders plus (i) provision for income taxes, (ii) interest expense, (iii) amortization of capitalized interest included in cost of sales, (iv) stock based compensation, (v) depreciation and amortization, (vi) cash distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures, (vii) equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures,(viii) non-cash purchase accounting adjustments, and (ix) loss on extinguishment of debt. Other companies may calculate adjusted EBITDA differently. Adjusted EBITDA is not a financial measure prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is presented herein because management believes the presentation of adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to the Company’s investors regarding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations because adjusted EBITDA is a widely utilized indicator of a company’s operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative for net income, cash flows from operating activities and other consolidated income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. A reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to adjusted EBITDA is provided in the following table:
Year Ended December 31, 2017 | Year Ended December 31, 2016 | |||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 48,135 | $ | 59,696 | ||||
Provision for income taxes | 62,933 | 34,850 | ||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||
Interest incurred | 73,729 | 83,218 | ||||||
Interest capitalized | (73,729 | ) | (83,218 | ) | ||||
Amortization of capitalized interest included in cost of sales | 83,570 | 60,160 | ||||||
Stock based compensation | 10,062 | 6,844 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,962 | 2,006 | ||||||
Cash distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures | 3,085 | 3,726 | ||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures | (3,661 | ) | (5,606 | ) | ||||
Non-cash purchase accounting adjustments | 15,771 | 26,445 | ||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt | 21,828 | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Adjusted EBITDA(non-GAAP) | $ | 243,685 | $ | 188,121 | ||||
|
|
|
|
A-1
Table of Contents
Adjusted net income means net income available to common stockholders plus the loss for the extinguishment of the 8.5% Senior Notes, net of the associated tax benefit, and income tax expense related to tax reform. Adjusted net income is not a financial measure prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted net income is presented herein because management believes the presentation of adjusted net income provides useful information to the Company’s investors regarding the Company’s results of operations because adjusted net income isolates the impact of the infrequent extinguishment fees andone-time deferred tax asset adjustment. Adjusted net income should not be considered as an alternative for net income, cash flows from operating activities and other consolidated income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. A reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to adjusted net income is provided in the following table:
Year | ||||
Ended | ||||
December 31, | ||||
2017 | ||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 48,135 | ||
Add: Loss on extinguishment of debt | 21,828 | |||
Add: Impact of tax reform change | 23,126 | |||
Less: Income tax benefit applicable to loss on extinguishment of debt | (7,752 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net income, adjusted for loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax benefit and impact of tax reform change | $ | 85,337 | ||
|
| |||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 38,663,667 | |||
Adjusted net income excluding noncontrolling interest per diluted share(non-GAAP) | $ | 2.21 |
A-2
Table of Contents
WILLIAM LYON HOMES Experience the pride. WILLIAM LYON HOMES 4695 MACARTHUR COURT, 8TH FLOOR NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 23, 2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 23, 2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. WILLIAM LYON HOMES The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: For All Withhold All For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 1. Election of seven directors to serve for a term of office expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Nominees: 01) Douglas K. Ammerman 05) Matthew R. Niemann 02) Thomas F. Harrison 06) Lynn Carlson Schell 03) Gary H. Hunt 07) Matthew R. Zaist 04) William H. Lyon The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain 2. Advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in the proxy materials. 3. Ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accountants of William Lyon Homes for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date
Table of Contents
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. WILLIAM LYON HOMES Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 24, 2018 at 10:00 AM local time William Lyon Homes 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 24, 2018 By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Matthew R. Zaist and Colin T. Severn and each of them acting in the absence of the other, with full power of substitution, to vote shares of Common Stock on the matters shown on the reverse side and any other matters which may come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments. THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. Continued and to be signed on reverse side