UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date: May 4, 2020
UBS AG
Commission File Number: 1-15060
(Registrant’s Name)
Bahnhofstrasse 45, Zurich, Switzerland
Aeschenvorstadt 1, Basel, Switzerland
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants file or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20‑F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F x Form 40-F o
This Form 6-K consists of the First Quarter 2020 Report of UBS AG, and an additional risk factor disclosure, which appears immediately following this page.
First Quarter 2020 Report
UBS AG
First quarter 2020 report
| |
3 | |
|
|
1. | Risk and capital |
6 | |
7 | |
2. | Consolidated |
15 | |
|
|
|
|
| Appendix |
59 | |
61 | |
63 | |
64 | |
| |
Corporate calendar UBS AG
Publication of the second quarter 2020 report: Friday, 24 July 2020
Publication dates of quarterly and annual reports and results are made available as part of the corporate calendar of UBS AG at www.ubs.com/investors
Contacts
Switchboards
For all general inquiries
www.ubs.com/contact
Zurich +41-44-234 1111
London +44-207-567 8000
New York +1-212-821 3000
Hong Kong +852-2971 8888
Singapore +65-6495 8000
Investor Relations
UBS’s Investor Relations team supports
institutional, professional and retail
investors from our offices in Zurich,
London, New York and Krakow.
UBS AG, Investor Relations
P.O. Box, CH-8098 Zurich, Switzerland
www.ubs.com/investors
Zurich +41-44-234 4100
New York +1-212-882 5734
Media Relations
UBS’s Media Relations team supports
global media and journalists from our
offices in Zurich, London, New York
and Hong Kong.
www.ubs.com/media
Zurich +41-44-234 8500
mediarelations@ubs.com
London +44-20-7567 4714
ubs-media-relations@ubs.com
New York +1-212-882 5858
mediarelations@ubs.com
Hong Kong +852-2971 8200
sh-mediarelations-ap@ubs.com
Imprint
Publisher: UBS AG, Zurich, Switzerland | www.ubs.com/media
Language: English
© UBS 2020. The key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS. All rights reserved.
UBS AG consolidated key figures
UBS AG consolidated key figures |
|
|
|
|
|
| As of or for the quarter ended | ||
USD million, except where indicated |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Results |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
| 8,009 | 7,145 | 7,343 |
Operating expenses |
| 6,210 | 6,332 | 5,890 |
Operating profit / (loss) before tax |
| 1,799 | 814 | 1,454 |
Net profit / (loss) attributable to shareholders |
| 1,421 | 622 | 1,069 |
Profitability and growth |
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (%) |
| 10.2 | 4.6 | 8.1 |
Return on tangible equity (%) |
| 11.5 | 5.2 | 9.3 |
Return on common equity tier 1 capital (%) |
| 15.9 | 7.1 | 12.3 |
Return on risk-weighted assets, gross (%) |
| 12.2 | 11.0 | 11.1 |
Return on leverage ratio denominator, gross (%)1 |
| 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Cost / income ratio (%) |
| 75.0 | 88.5 | 80.0 |
Net profit growth (%) |
| 33.0 | 128.4 | (24.3) |
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
| 1,099,185 | 971,916 | 956,737 |
Equity attributable to shareholders |
| 57,814 | 53,754 | 53,216 |
Common equity tier 1 capital2 |
| 36,194 | 35,280 | 34,933 |
Risk-weighted assets2 |
| 284,706 | 257,831 | 266,581 |
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio (%)2 |
| 12.7 | 13.7 | 13.1 |
Going concern capital ratio (%)2 |
| 16.5 | 18.3 | 17.0 |
Total loss-absorbing capacity ratio (%)2 |
| 32.1 | 33.9 | 32.2 |
Leverage ratio denominator2 |
| 957,199 | 911,232 | 911,410 |
Leverage ratio denominator (with temporary FINMA exemption)3 |
| 903,756 |
|
|
Common equity tier 1 leverage ratio (%)2 |
| 3.78 | 3.87 | 3.83 |
Common equity tier 1 leverage ratio (%) (with temporary FINMA exemption)3 |
| 4.00 |
|
|
Going concern leverage ratio (%)2 |
| 4.9 | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Going concern leverage ratio (%) (with temporary FINMA exemption)3 |
| 5.2 |
|
|
Total loss-absorbing capacity leverage ratio (%)2 |
| 9.5 | 9.6 | 9.4 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
Invested assets (USD billion)4 |
| 3,236 | 3,607 | 3,318 |
Personnel (full-time equivalents) |
| 47,182 | 47,005 | 47,773 |
1 The leverage ratio denominator as of 31 March 2020, used for the return calculation, does not reflect the effect of the temporary exemption granted by FINMA in connection with COVID-19. Refer to the “Recent developments” section of the UBS Group first quarter 2020 report for more information. 2 Based on the Swiss systemically relevant bank framework as of 1 January 2020. Refer to the “Capital management” section of this report for more information. 3 Refer to the “Recent developments” section of the UBS Group first quarter 2020 report and the “Capital management” section of this report for further details about the temporary FINMA exemption. 4 Includes invested assets for Global Wealth Management, Asset Management and Personal & Corporate Banking. |
Alternative performance measures An alternative performance measure (an APM) is a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable recognized accounting standards or in other applicable regulations. We report a number of APMs in our external reports (annual, quarterly and other reports). We use APMs to provide a fuller picture of our operating performance and to reflect management’s view of the fundamental drivers of our business results. A definition of each APM, the method used to calculate it and the information content are presented under “Alternative performance measures” in the appendix to this report. Our APMs may qualify as non-GAAP measures as defined by US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations. |
2
Structure of this report
UBS Group AG is the holding company for the UBS Group and the parent company of UBS AG. UBS Group AG holds 100% of the issued shares in UBS AG. Financial information for UBS AG consolidated does not differ materially from that for UBS Group AG consolidated.
This report includes risk and capital management information for UBS AG consolidated and the interim consolidated financial statements, as well as UBS AG standalone financial information for the quarter ended 31 March 2020. Regulatory information for UBS AG standalone is provided in the 31 March 2020 Pillar 3 report, available under “Pillar 3 disclosures” at www.ubs.com/investors.
® Refer to the UBS Group first quarter 2020 report available under “Quarterly reporting” at www.ubs.com/investors for more information
Comparison between UBS Group AG consolidated and UBS AG consolidated
The table on the following page contains a comparison of selected financial and capital information between UBS Group AG consolidated and UBS AG consolidated.
The accounting policies applied under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to both the UBS Group AG and the UBS AG consolidated financial statements are identical. However, there are certain scope and presentation differences as noted below:
– Assets, liabilities, operating income, operating expenses and operating profit before tax relating to UBS Group AG and its directly held subsidiaries, including UBS Business Solutions AG, are reflected in the consolidated financial statements of UBS Group AG but not of UBS AG. UBS AG’s assets, liabilities, operating income and operating expenses related to transactions with UBS Group AG and its directly held subsidiaries, including UBS Business Solutions AG and other shared services subsidiaries, are not subject to elimination in the UBS AG consolidated financial statements, but are eliminated in the UBS Group AG consolidated financial statements. UBS Business Solutions AG and other shared services subsidiaries of UBS Group AG charge other legal entities within the UBS AG consolidation scope for services provided, including a markup on costs incurred.
– The equity of UBS Group AG consolidated was USD 0.1 billion higher than the equity of UBS AG consolidated as of 31 March 2020. This difference is mainly driven by higher dividends paid by UBS AG to UBS Group AG compared with the dividend distributions of UBS Group AG, as well as higher retained earnings in the UBS Group AG consolidated financial statements, largely related to the aforementioned markup charged by shared services subsidiaries of UBS Group AG to other legal entities in the UBS AG scope of consolidation. In addition, UBS Group AG is the grantor of the majority of the compensation plans of the Group and recognizes share premium for equity-settled awards granted. These effects were partly offset by treasury shares acquired as part of our share repurchase program and those held to hedge share delivery obligations associated with Group compensation plans, as well as additional share premium recognized at the UBS AG consolidated level related to the establishment of UBS Group AG and UBS Business Solutions AG, a wholly owned subsidiary of UBS Group AG.
– The going concern capital of UBS Group AG consolidated was USD 4.8 billion higher than the going concern capital of UBS AG consolidated as of 31 March 2020, reflecting higher going concern loss-absorbing additional tier 1 (AT1) capital of USD 4.3 billion and higher common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital of USD 0.5 billion.
– The CET1 capital of UBS Group AG consolidated was USD 0.5 billion higher than that of UBS AG consolidated as of 31 March 2020. The difference in CET1 capital was primarily due to higher UBS Group AG consolidated IFRS equity of USD 0.1 billion, as described above, and different accruals for future capital returns to shareholders, partly offset by compensation-related regulatory capital accruals at the UBS Group AG level.
– The going concern loss-absorbing AT1 capital of UBS Group AG consolidated was USD 4.3 billion higher than that of UBS AG consolidated as of 31 March 2020, reflecting deferred contingent capital plan awards and low-trigger loss-absorbing AT1 capital notes. These AT1 capital notes were issued by UBS Group AG after the implementation of the new Swiss SRB framework, and only qualify as gone concern loss-absorbing capacity at the UBS AG consolidated level.
® Refer to “Holding company and significant regulated subsidiaries and sub-groups” under “Complementary financial information” at www.ubs.com/investors for an illustration of the consolidation scope differences between UBS AG and UBS Group AG
® Refer to the “Capital management” section of this report for more information about differences in the loss-absorbing capacity between UBS Group AG consolidated and UBS AG consolidated
3
Comparison between UBS Group AG consolidated and UBS AG consolidated |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| As of or for the quarter ended 31.3.20 |
| As of or for the quarter ended 31.12.19 | ||||
USD million, except where indicated |
| UBS Group AG consolidated | UBS AG consolidated | Difference (absolute) |
| UBS Group AG consolidated | UBS AG consolidated | Difference (absolute) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
| 7,934 | 8,009 | (75) |
| 7,052 | 7,145 | (93) |
Operating expenses |
| 5,926 | 6,210 | (285) |
| 6,124 | 6,332 | (207) |
Operating profit / (loss) before tax |
| 2,008 | 1,799 | 209 |
| 928 | 814 | 114 |
of which: Global Wealth Management |
| 1,218 | 1,201 | 18 |
| 766 | 754 | 12 |
of which: Personal & Corporate Banking |
| 334 | 335 | 0 |
| 310 | 311 | (1) |
of which: Asset Management |
| 157 | 157 | 0 |
| 180 | 180 | 0 |
of which: Investment Bank |
| 709 | 679 | 30 |
| (22) | (18) | (4) |
of which: Group Functions |
| (410) | (572) | 162 |
| (306) | (413) | 107 |
Net profit / (loss) |
| 1,598 | 1,424 | 174 |
| 727 | 628 | 100 |
of which: net profit / (loss) attributable to shareholders |
| 1,595 | 1,421 | 174 |
| 722 | 622 | 100 |
of which: net profit / (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
| 3 | 3 | 0 |
| 6 | 6 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
| 2,597 | 2,671 | (74) |
| (2,295) | (1,475) | (819) |
of which: attributable to shareholders |
| 2,602 | 2,675 | (74) |
| (2,299) | (1,479) | (819) |
of which: attributable to non-controlling interests |
| (5) | (5) | 0 |
| 4 | 4 | 0 |
Total comprehensive income |
| 4,195 | 4,095 | 100 |
| (1,567) | (847) | (720) |
of which: attributable to shareholders |
| 4,197 | 4,097 | 100 |
| (1,577) | (857) | (720) |
of which: attributable to non-controlling interests |
| (2) | (2) | 0 |
| 10 | 10 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
| 1,098,099 | 1,099,185 | (1,085) |
| 972,183 | 971,916 | 267 |
Total liabilities |
| 1,039,981 | 1,041,201 | (1,220) |
| 917,476 | 917,988 | (512) |
Total equity |
| 58,118 | 57,983 | 135 |
| 54,707 | 53,928 | 779 |
of which: equity attributable to shareholders |
| 57,949 | 57,814 | 135 |
| 54,533 | 53,754 | 779 |
of which: equity attributable to non-controlling interests |
| 169 | 169 | 0 |
| 174 | 174 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity tier 1 capital |
| 36,691 | 36,194 | 497 |
| 35,582 | 35,280 | 302 |
Going concern capital |
| 51,916 | 47,115 | 4,801 |
| 51,888 | 47,237 | 4,650 |
Risk-weighted assets |
| 286,256 | 284,706 | 1,551 |
| 259,208 | 257,831 | 1,376 |
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio (%) |
| 12.8 | 12.7 | 0.1 |
| 13.7 | 13.7 | 0.0 |
Going concern capital ratio (%) |
| 18.1 | 16.5 | 1.6 |
| 20.0 | 18.3 | 1.7 |
Total loss-absorbing capacity ratio (%) |
| 32.7 | 32.1 | 0.6 |
| 34.6 | 33.9 | 0.7 |
Leverage ratio denominator |
| 955,932 | 957,199 | (1,267) |
| 911,325 | 911,232 | 94 |
Leverage ratio denominator (with temporary FINMA exemption)1 |
| 877,463 | 903,756 | (26,293) |
|
|
|
|
Common equity tier 1 leverage ratio (%) |
| 3.84 | 3.78 | 0.06 |
| 3.90 | 3.87 | 0.03 |
Common equity tier 1 leverage ratio (%) (with temporary FINMA exemption)1 |
| 4.18 | 4.00 | 0.18 |
|
|
|
|
Going concern leverage ratio (%) |
| 5.4 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
| 5.7 | 5.2 | 0.5 |
Going concern leverage ratio (%) (with temporary FINMA exemption)1 |
| 5.9 | 5.2 | 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total loss-absorbing capacity leverage ratio (%) |
| 9.8 | 9.5 | 0.3 |
| 9.8 | 9.6 | 0.2 |
1 Refer to the “Recent developments” section and the “Capital management” section of the UBS Group first quarter 2020 report and the “Capital management” section of this report for further details about the temporary FINMA exemption. |
4
Risk and capital management
Management report
UBS AG consolidated risk profile
The risk profile of UBS AG consolidated does not differ materially from that of UBS Group AG consolidated and risk information provided in the UBS Group first quarter 2020 report is equally applicable to UBS AG consolidated.
The credit risk profile of UBS AG consolidated differs from that of UBS Group AG consolidated primarily in relation to receivables of UBS AG and UBS Switzerland AG from UBS Group AG. As a result of these receivables, total banking products exposure of UBS AG consolidated as of 31 March 2020 was USD 2.5 billion, or 0.4%, higher than the exposure of UBS Group, compared with USD 1.2 billion, or 0.2%, as of 31 December 2019.
® Refer to the “Risk management and control” section of the UBS Group first quarter 2020 report for more information
6
Capital management
Going and gone concern requirements and information
UBS is considered a systemically relevant bank (an SRB) under Swiss banking law and, on a consolidated basis, both UBS Group AG and UBS AG are required to comply with regulations based on the Basel III framework as applicable for Swiss SRBs.
The Swiss SRB framework and requirements applicable to UBS AG consolidated are consistent with those applicable to UBS Group AG consolidated and are described in the “Capital management” section of our Annual Report 2019. Effective from 1 January 2020, we have adopted the Capital Adequacy Ordinance (the CAO) issued in November 2019 whereby instruments available to meet gone concern requirements remain eligible until one year before maturity without the previously applicable 50% haircut in the last year of eligibility.
UBS AG is subject to going and gone concern requirements on a standalone basis. Capital and other regulatory information for UBS AG standalone is provided in the 31 March 2020 Pillar 3 report – UBS Group AG and significant regulated subsidiaries and sub-groups, which is available under “Pillar 3 disclosures” at www.ubs.com/investors.
In connection with COVID-19, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has permitted banks to temporarily exclude central bank sight deposits from the leverage ratio denominator (LRD) for the purpose of calculating going concern ratios. This exemption applies until 1 July 2020 and may be extended. Applicable dividends or similar distributions approved by shareholders after 25 March 2020 reduce the relief by the LRD equivalent of the capital distribution.
Outside of this section of this report, for simplicity and due to the short-term nature of the FINMA exemption, we have chosen to present LRD excluding the temporary FINMA exemption. The effects of the temporary exemption are presented in a separate table on the following page.
7
Swiss SRB going and gone concern requirements and information | ||||||
|
|
| ||||
As of 31.3.20 |
| RWA |
| LRD1 | ||
USD million, except where indicated |
| in % | in USD million |
| in % | in USD million |
Required going concern capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total going concern capital |
| 13.962 | 39,733 |
| 4.882 | 46,663 |
Common equity tier 1 capital |
| 9.66 | 27,491 |
| 3.38 | 32,305 |
of which: minimum capital |
| 4.50 | 12,812 |
| 1.50 | 14,358 |
of which: buffer capital |
| 5.14 | 14,634 |
| 1.88 | 17,947 |
of which: countercyclical buffer3 |
| 0.02 | 45 |
|
|
|
Maximum additional tier 1 capital |
| 4.30 | 12,242 |
| 1.50 | 14,358 |
of which: additional tier 1 capital |
| 3.50 | 9,965 |
| 1.50 | 14,358 |
of which: additional tier 1 buffer capital |
| 0.80 | 2,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible going concern capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total going concern capital |
| 16.55 | 47,115 |
| 4.92 | 47,115 |
Common equity tier 1 capital |
| 12.71 | 36,194 |
| 3.78 | 36,194 |
Total loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital |
| 3.84 | 10,921 |
| 1.14 | 10,921 |
of which: high-trigger loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital |
| 3.84 | 10,921 |
| 1.14 | 10,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required gone concern capital4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gone concern loss-absorbing capacity |
| 10.01 | 28,512 |
| 3.58 | 34,290 |
of which: base requirement |
| 12.86 | 36,613 |
| 4.50 | 43,074 |
of which: additional requirement for market share and LRD |
| 1.08 | 3,075 |
| 0.38 | 3,589 |
of which: applicable reduction on requirements |
| (3.93) | (11,176) |
| (1.29) | (12,374) |
of which: rebate granted (equivalent to 42.5% of maximum rebate) |
| (2.27) | (6,461) |
| (0.80) | (7,628) |
of which: reduction for usage of low-trigger additional tier 1 and tier 2 capital instruments |
| (1.66) | (4,714) |
| (0.50) | (4,746) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible gone concern capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gone concern loss-absorbing capacity |
| 15.51 | 44,167 |
| 4.61 | 44,167 |
Total tier 1 capital |
| 0.87 | 2,463 |
| 0.26 | 2,463 |
of which: low-trigger loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital5 |
| 0.87 | 2,463 |
| 0.26 | 2,463 |
Total tier 2 capital |
| 2.65 | 7,551 |
| 0.79 | 7,551 |
of which: low-trigger loss-absorbing tier 2 capital |
| 2.46 | 7,017 |
| 0.73 | 7,017 |
of which: non-Basel III-compliant tier 2 capital |
| 0.19 | 534 |
| 0.06 | 534 |
TLAC-eligible senior unsecured debt |
| 12.00 | 34,153 |
| 3.57 | 34,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss-absorbing capacity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required total loss-absorbing capacity |
| 23.97 | 68,245 |
| 8.46 | 80,953 |
Eligible total loss-absorbing capacity |
| 32.06 | 91,283 |
| 9.54 | 91,283 |
1 LRD-based requirements and eligible capital presented in this table do not reflect the effects of the temporary exemption granted by FINMA in connection with COVID-19. Refer to the “Recent developments” section of our UBS Group first quarter 2020 report available under “Quarterly reporting” at www.ubs.com/investors for more information. 2 Includes applicable add-ons of 1.08% for RWA and 0.375% for LRD. 3 Reflects the countercyclical buffer (CCyB) requirement for Hong Kong and Luxembourg. The CCyBs of Switzerland and other countries have been deactivated or reduced in the first quarter of 2020, resulting in a temporary reduction of the capital requirement by 29 basis points compared with 31 December 2019. 4 From 1 January 2020 onward, a maximum of 25% of the gone concern requirements can be met with instruments that have a remaining maturity of between one and two years. 5 The relevant capital instruments were issued after the new Swiss SRB framework had been implemented and therefore do not meet going concern capital requirements in all entities. |
Swiss SRB going concern requirements and information including temporary FINMA exemption | |||
As of 31.3.20 |
| LRD | |
USD million, except where indicated |
| in % |
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio denominator before temporary exemption |
|
| 957,199 |
Effective relief |
|
| (53,443) |
of which: central bank sight deposits eligible for relief |
|
| (132,377) |
of which: reduction of relief due to planned dividend distribution |
|
| 78,933 |
Leverage ratio denominator after temporary exemption |
|
| 903,756 |
|
|
|
|
Required going concern capital |
|
|
|
Total going concern capital |
| 4.88 | 44,058 |
Common equity tier 1 capital |
| 3.38 | 30,502 |
|
|
|
|
Eligible going concern capital |
|
|
|
Total going concern capital |
| 5.21 | 47,115 |
Common equity tier 1 capital |
| 4.00 | 36,194 |
8
Swiss SRB going and gone concern information | |||
|
|
|
|
USD million, except where indicated |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
|
|
|
|
Eligible going concern capital |
|
|
|
Total going concern capital |
| 47,115 | 47,237 |
Total tier 1 capital |
| 47,115 | 47,237 |
Common equity tier 1 capital |
| 36,194 | 35,280 |
Total loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital |
| 10,921 | 11,958 |
of which: high-trigger loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital |
| 10,921 | 11,958 |
|
|
|
|
Eligible gone concern capital |
|
|
|
Total gone concern loss-absorbing capacity |
| 44,167 | 40,168 |
Total tier 1 capital |
| 2,463 | 2,415 |
of which: low-trigger loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital1 |
| 2,463 | 2,415 |
Total tier 2 capital |
| 7,551 | 7,431 |
of which: low-trigger loss-absorbing tier 2 capital |
| 7,017 | 6,892 |
of which: non-Basel III-compliant tier 2 capital |
| 534 | 540 |
TLAC-eligible senior unsecured debt |
| 34,1532 | 30,322 |
|
|
|
|
Total loss-absorbing capacity |
|
|
|
Total loss-absorbing capacity |
| 91,283 | 87,405 |
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets / leverage ratio denominator |
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
| 284,706 | 257,831 |
Leverage ratio denominator3 |
| 957,199 | 911,232 |
|
|
|
|
Capital and loss-absorbing capacity ratios (%) |
|
|
|
Going concern capital ratio |
| 16.5 | 18.3 |
of which: common equity tier 1 capital ratio |
| 12.7 | 13.7 |
Gone concern loss-absorbing capacity ratio |
| 15.5 | 15.6 |
Total loss-absorbing capacity ratio |
| 32.1 | 33.9 |
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratios (%)3 |
|
|
|
Going concern leverage ratio |
| 4.9 | 5.2 |
of which: common equity tier 1 leverage ratio |
| 3.78 | 3.87 |
Gone concern leverage ratio |
| 4.6 | 4.4 |
Total loss-absorbing capacity leverage ratio |
| 9.5 | 9.6 |
1 The relevant capital instruments were issued after the new Swiss SRB framework had been implemented and therefore do not meet going concern capital requirements in all entities. 2 The eligibility criteria applicable as of 1 January 2020 have been revised under the Capital Adequacy Ordinance issued in November 2019 whereby instruments available to meet gone concern requirements remain eligible until one year before maturity without the previously applicable 50% haircut in the last year of eligibility. 3 Leverage ratio denominator (LRD) and leverage ratios for 31 March 2020 do not reflect the effects of the temporary exemption granted by FINMA in connection with COVID-19. The effects of the temporary exemption granted by FINMA in connection with COVID-19 are presented on the previous page in this section. |
9
UBS Group AG vs UBS AG consolidated loss-absorbing capacity and leverage ratio information
Swiss SRB going and gone concern information (UBS Group AG vs UBS AG consolidated) | ||||
As of 31.3.20 |
|
| ||
USD million, except where indicated |
| UBS Group AG (consolidated) | UBS AG (consolidated) | Difference |
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible going concern capital |
|
|
|
|
Total going concern capital |
| 51,916 | 47,115 | 4,801 |
Total tier 1 capital |
| 51,916 | 47,115 | 4,801 |
Common equity tier 1 capital |
| 36,691 | 36,194 | 497 |
Total loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital |
| 15,225 | 10,921 | 4,304 |
of which: high-trigger loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital |
| 12,761 | 10,921 | 1,840 |
of which: low-trigger loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital |
| 2,464 |
| 2,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible gone concern capital |
|
|
|
|
Total gone concern loss-absorbing capacity |
| 41,704 | 44,167 | (2,463) |
Total tier 1 capital |
|
| 2,463 | (2,463) |
of which: low-trigger loss-absorbing additional tier 1 capital |
|
| 2,4631 | (2,463) |
Total tier 2 capital |
| 7,551 | 7,551 | 0 |
of which: low-trigger loss-absorbing tier 2 capital |
| 7,017 | 7,017 | 0 |
of which: non-Basel III-compliant tier 2 capital |
| 534 | 534 | 0 |
TLAC-eligible senior unsecured debt |
| 34,153 | 34,153 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss-absorbing capacity |
|
|
|
|
Total loss-absorbing capacity |
| 93,620 | 91,283 | 2,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets / leverage ratio denominator |
|
| ||
Risk-weighted assets |
| 286,256 | 284,706 | 1,551 |
Leverage ratio denominator2 |
| 955,932 | 957,199 | (1,267) |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and loss-absorbing capacity ratios (%) |
|
|
|
|
Going concern capital ratio |
| 18.1 | 16.5 | 1.6 |
of which: common equity tier 1 capital ratio |
| 12.8 | 12.7 | 0.1 |
Gone concern loss-absorbing capacity ratio |
| 14.6 | 15.5 | (0.9) |
Total loss-absorbing capacity ratio |
| 32.7 | 32.1 | 0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratios (%)2 |
|
|
|
|
Going concern leverage ratio |
| 5.4 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
of which: common equity tier 1 leverage ratio |
| 3.84 | 3.78 | 0.06 |
Gone concern leverage ratio |
| 4.4 | 4.6 | (0.3) |
Total loss-absorbing capacity leverage ratio |
| 9.8 | 9.5 | 0.3 |
1 The relevant capital instruments were issued after the new Swiss SRB framework had been implemented and therefore do not meet going concern capital requirements in all entities. 2 Leverage ratio denominator (LRD) and leverage ratios for 31 March 2020 do not reflect the effects of the temporary exemption granted by FINMA in connection with COVID-19. The effects of the temporary exemption granted by FINMA in connection with COVID-19 are presented in the “Swiss SRB going concern requirements and information including temporary FINMA exemption” table in this section. |
10
Reconciliation of IFRS equity to Swiss SRB common equity tier 1 capital (UBS Group AG vs UBS AG consolidated) | ||||
As of 31.3.20 |
|
|
| |
USD million |
| UBS Group AG (consolidated) | UBS AG (consolidated) | Difference |
Total IFRS equity |
| 58,118 | 57,983 | 135 |
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests |
| (169) | (169) | 0 |
Defined benefit plans, net of tax |
| (260) | (260) | 0 |
Deferred tax assets recognized for tax loss carry-forwards |
| (6,272) | (6,272) | 0 |
Goodwill, net of tax |
| (5,983) | (5,983) | 0 |
Intangible assets, net of tax |
| (170) | (170) | 0 |
Compensation-related components (not recognized in net profit) |
| (980) |
| (980) |
Expected losses on advanced internal ratings-based portfolio less provisions |
| (429) | (429) | 0 |
Unrealized (gains) / losses from cash flow hedges, net of tax |
| (2,765) | (2,765) | 0 |
Own credit related to (gains) / losses on financial liabilities measured at fair value that existed at the balance sheet date, net of tax |
| (1,037) | (1,037) | 0 |
Unrealized gains related to debt instruments at fair value through OCI, net of tax |
| (161) | (161) | 0 |
Prudential valuation adjustments |
| (218) | (218) | 0 |
Accruals for dividends to shareholders for 2019 |
| (2,628) | (3,848) | 1,220 |
Other1 |
| (357) | (479) | 122 |
Total common equity tier 1 capital |
| 36,691 | 36,194 | 497 |
1 Includes accruals for dividends to shareholders for the current year and other items. |
UBS Group AG vs UBS AG consolidated loss-absorbing capacity and leverage ratio information
The going concern capital of UBS AG consolidated was USD 4.8 billion lower than the going concern capital of UBS Group AG consolidated as of 31 March 2020, reflecting lower additional tier 1 (AT1) capital of USD 4.3 billion and lower common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital of USD 0.5 billion. The gone concern loss-absorbing capacity of UBS AG consolidated was USD 2.5 billion higher, due to low-trigger loss-absorbing AT1 capital.
The CET1 capital of UBS AG consolidated was USD 0.5 billion lower than that of UBS Group AG consolidated as of 31 March 2020. The difference in CET1 capital was primarily due to higher UBS Group AG consolidated IFRS equity of USD 0.1 billion and different accruals for future capital returns to shareholders, partly offset by compensation-related regulatory capital accruals at the UBS Group AG level.
The going concern loss-absorbing AT1 capital of UBS AG consolidated was USD 4.3 billion lower than that of UBS Group AG consolidated as of 31 March 2020, reflecting Deferred Contingent Capital Plan awards granted to eligible employees for the performance years 2015 to 2019 and USD 2.5 billion low-trigger AT1 capital notes.
The aforementioned difference of USD 2.5 billion in gone concern low-trigger AT1 capital relates to capital instruments that were on-lent to UBS AG after the new Swiss SRB framework had been implemented and are therefore not recognized within going concern capital but qualify as gone concern loss-absorbing capacity. Issuances of low-trigger AT1 capital from UBS Group AG were all made prior to the implementation of the new Swiss SRB framework and therefore qualify as going concern capital.
Differences in capital between UBS Group AG consolidated and UBS AG consolidated related to employee compensation plans will reverse to the extent underlying services are performed by employees of, and are consequently charged to, UBS AG and its subsidiaries. Such reversal generally occurs over the service period of the employee compensation plans.
The leverage ratio framework for UBS AG consolidated is consistent with that of UBS Group AG consolidated. As of 31 March 2020, the going concern leverage ratio of UBS AG consolidated was 0.5 percentage points lower than that of UBS Group AG consolidated, mainly because the going concern capital of UBS AG consolidated was USD 4.8 billion lower.
® Refer to the “Capital management” section of the UBS Group first quarter 2020 report available under “Quarterly reporting” at www.ubs.com/investors for information about the developments of loss-absorbing capacity, RWA and LRD for UBS Group AG consolidated
® Refer to the “Introduction” section of this report for more information about the differences in equity between UBS AG consolidated and UBS Group AG
11
Consolidated
financial statements
Unaudited
| UBS AG interim consolidated financial |
|
|
15 | |
16 | |
18 | |
20 | |
22 | |
|
|
24 | |
27 | |
28 | |
29 | |
29 | |
30 | |
30 | |
30 | |
31 | |
36 | |
45 | |
46 | |
48 | |
48 | |
49 | |
58 | 16 Guarantees, commitments and forward starting |
58 | |
58 |
UBS AG interim consolidated
financial statements (unaudited)
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| Note |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Interest income from financial instruments measured at amortized cost and fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 3 |
| 2,457 | 2,570 | 2,674 |
Interest expense from financial instruments measured at amortized cost |
| 3 |
| (1,406) | (1,600) | (1,912) |
Net interest income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
| 262 | 274 | 339 |
Net interest income |
| 3 |
| 1,313 | 1,244 | 1,101 |
Other net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
| 1,775 | 1,376 | 1,936 |
Credit loss (expense) / recovery |
| 9 |
| (268) | (8) | (20) |
Fee and commission income |
| 4 |
| 5,481 | 4,861 | 4,566 |
Fee and commission expense |
| 4 |
| (456) | (458) | (409) |
Net fee and commission income |
| 4 |
| 5,025 | 4,403 | 4,157 |
Other income |
| 5 |
| 164 | 130 | 169 |
Total operating income |
|
|
| 8,009 | 7,145 | 7,343 |
Personnel expenses |
| 6 |
| 3,710 | 3,323 | 3,468 |
General and administrative expenses |
| 7 |
| 2,080 | 2,456 | 2,026 |
Depreciation and impairment of property, equipment and software |
|
|
| 405 | 428 | 379 |
Amortization and impairment of goodwill and intangible assets |
|
|
| 16 | 125 | 16 |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
| 6,210 | 6,332 | 5,890 |
Operating profit / (loss) before tax |
|
|
| 1,799 | 814 | 1,454 |
Tax expense / (benefit) |
| 8 |
| 375 | 186 | 387 |
Net profit / (loss) |
|
|
| 1,424 | 628 | 1,067 |
Net profit / (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
| 3 | 6 | (2) |
Net profit / (loss) attributable to shareholders |
|
|
| 1,421 | 622 | 1,069 |
15
UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Statement of comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
Net profit / (loss) |
| 1,421 | 622 | 1,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income that may be reclassified to the income statement |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation movements related to net assets of foreign operations, before tax |
| (274) | 715 | (151) |
Effective portion of changes in fair value of hedging instruments designated as net investment hedges, before tax |
| 136 | (349) | 26 |
Foreign currency translation differences on foreign operations reclassified to the income statement |
| 0 | 3 | 1 |
Effective portion of changes in fair value of hedging instruments designated as net investment hedges reclassified to the income statement |
| (8) | (2) | 0 |
Income tax relating to foreign currency translations, including the impact of net investment hedges |
| 0 | (1) | 1 |
Subtotal foreign currency translation, net of tax |
| (147) | 367 | (122) |
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains / (losses), before tax |
| 208 | (12) | 81 |
Realized gains reclassified to the income statement from equity |
| (9) | (4) | (1) |
Realized losses reclassified to the income statement from equity |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
Income tax relating to net unrealized gains / (losses) |
| (51) | 4 | (17) |
Subtotal financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of tax |
| 147 | (11) | 62 |
Cash flow hedges of interest rate risk |
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of changes in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, before tax |
| 1,953 | (545) | 588 |
Net (gains) / losses reclassified to the income statement from equity |
| (103) | (82) | (21) |
Income tax relating to cash flow hedges |
| (345) | 121 | (107) |
Subtotal cash flow hedges, net of tax |
| 1,505 | (506) | 459 |
Fair value hedges of foreign currency risk |
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of cost of hedging, before tax |
| 6 |
|
|
Amortization of initial cost of hedging to the income statement |
| 2 |
|
|
Income tax relating to cost of hedging |
| 0 |
|
|
Subtotal cost of hedging, net of tax |
| 8 |
|
|
Total other comprehensive income that may be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax |
| 1,514 | (150) | 399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to the income statement |
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
Gains / (losses) on defined benefit plans, before tax |
| 1041 | (1,447) | (160) |
Income tax relating to defined benefit plans |
| 124 | 265 | (16) |
Subtotal defined benefit plans, net of tax |
| 228 | (1,181) | (176) |
Own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value |
|
|
|
|
Gains / (losses) from own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value, before tax |
| 1,156 | (147) | (326) |
Income tax relating to own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value |
| (223) | 0 | 8 |
Subtotal own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value, net of tax |
| 934 | (147) | (318) |
Total other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax |
| 1,161 | (1,329) | (494) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
| 2,675 | (1,479) | (94) |
Total comprehensive income attributable to shareholders |
| 4,097 | (857) | 974 |
16
Statement of comprehensive income (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
Net profit / (loss) |
| 3 | 6 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to the income statement |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation movements, before tax |
| (5) | 4 | 4 |
Income tax relating to foreign currency translation movements |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subtotal foreign currency translation, net of tax |
| (5) | 4 | 4 |
Total other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax |
| (5) | 4 | 4 |
Total comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests |
| (2) | 10 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
Net profit / (loss) |
| 1,424 | 628 | 1,067 |
Other comprehensive income |
| 2,671 | (1,475) | (90) |
of which: other comprehensive income that may be reclassified to the income statement |
| 1,514 | (150) | 399 |
of which: other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to the income statement |
| 1,157 | (1,325) | (489) |
Total comprehensive income |
| 4,095 | (847) | 977 |
1 Includes a net pre-tax OCI gain of USD 247 million related to UK defined benefit plans (driven by a decrease in the defined benefit obligation mainly resulting from a higher discount rate), largely offset by a net pre-tax OCI loss of USD 148 million related to the Swiss pension plan (driven by an extraordinary employer contribution of USD 143 million that increased the gross plan assets, but led to an OCI loss as no net pension asset could be recognized on the balance sheet as of 31 March 2020 due to the asset ceiling). Refer to “Note 29 Pension and other post-employment benefit plans” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019 for more information about the effects from changes to the Swiss pension plan and the measures to mitigate them. |
17
UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
USD million |
| Note |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central banks |
|
|
| 139,258 | 107,068 |
Loans and advances to banks |
|
|
| 16,893 | 12,379 |
Receivables from securities financing transactions |
|
|
| 89,648 | 84,245 |
Cash collateral receivables on derivative instruments |
| 11 |
| 39,549 | 23,289 |
Loans and advances to customers |
| 9 |
| 339,946 | 327,992 |
Other financial assets measured at amortized cost |
| 12 |
| 23,907 | 23,012 |
Total financial assets measured at amortized cost |
|
|
| 649,202 | 577,985 |
Financial assets at fair value held for trading |
| 10 |
| 90,686 | 127,695 |
of which: assets pledged as collateral that may be sold or repledged by counterparties |
|
|
| 31,192 | 41,285 |
Derivative financial instruments |
| 10, 11 |
| 212,986 | 121,843 |
Brokerage receivables |
| 10 |
| 20,319 | 18,007 |
Financial assets at fair value not held for trading |
| 10 |
| 82,490 | 83,636 |
Total financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
| 406,482 | 351,181 |
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 10 |
| 7,653 | 6,345 |
Investments in associates |
|
|
| 1,042 | 1,051 |
Property, equipment and software |
|
|
| 11,812 | 11,826 |
Goodwill and intangible assets |
|
|
| 6,407 | 6,469 |
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
| 9,289 | 9,513 |
Other non-financial assets |
| 12 |
| 7,299 | 7,547 |
Total assets |
|
|
| 1,099,185 | 971,916 |
18
Balance sheet (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
USD million |
| Note |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to banks |
|
|
| 18,822 | 6,570 |
Payables from securities financing transactions |
|
|
| 12,867 | 7,778 |
Cash collateral payables on derivative instruments |
| 11 |
| 45,649 | 31,416 |
Customer deposits |
|
|
| 468,422 | 450,591 |
Funding from UBS Group AG and its subsidiaries |
|
|
| 49,192 | 47,866 |
Debt issued measured at amortized cost |
| 14 |
| 66,479 | 62,835 |
Other financial liabilities measured at amortized cost |
| 12 |
| 10,462 | 10,373 |
Total financial liabilities measured at amortized cost |
|
|
| 671,893 | 617,429 |
Financial liabilities at fair value held for trading |
| 10 |
| 32,572 | 30,591 |
Derivative financial instruments |
| 10, 11 |
| 206,654 | 120,880 |
Brokerage payables designated at fair value |
| 10 |
| 37,652 | 37,233 |
Debt issued designated at fair value |
| 10, 13 |
| 53,040 | 66,592 |
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value |
| 10, 12 |
| 31,794 | 36,157 |
Total financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
| 361,713 | 291,452 |
Provisions |
| 15 |
| 2,530 | 2,938 |
Other non-financial liabilities |
| 12 |
| 5,065 | 6,168 |
Total liabilities |
|
|
| 1,041,201 | 917,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
| 338 | 338 |
Share premium |
|
|
| 24,663 | 24,659 |
Retained earnings |
|
|
| 25,994 | 23,451 |
Other comprehensive income recognized directly in equity, net of tax |
|
|
| 6,820 | 5,306 |
Equity attributable to shareholders |
|
|
| 57,814 | 53,754 |
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
| 169 | 174 |
Total equity |
|
|
| 57,983 | 53,928 |
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
| 1,099,185 | 971,916 |
19
UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Statement of changes in equity |
|
|
|
USD million | Share capital | Share premium | Retained earnings |
Balance as of 1 January 2019 before the adoption of IFRIC 23 | 338 | 24,655 | 23,317 |
Effect of adoption of IFRIC 23 |
|
| (11) |
Balance as of 1 January 2019 after the adoption of IFRIC 23 | 338 | 24,655 | 23,306 |
Issuance of share capital |
|
|
|
Premium on shares issued and warrants exercised |
|
|
|
Tax (expense) / benefit |
| 2 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
Translation effects recognized directly in retained earnings |
|
| 4 |
New consolidations / (deconsolidations) and other increases / (decreases) |
| (6) |
|
Total comprehensive income for the period |
|
| 575 |
of which: net profit / (loss) |
|
| 1,069 |
of which: other comprehensive income (OCI) that may be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax |
|
|
|
of which: OCI that will not be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax – defined benefit plans |
|
| (176) |
of which: OCI that will not be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax – own credit |
|
| (318) |
of which: OCI that will not be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax – foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
Balance as of 31 March 2019 | 338 | 24,651 | 23,886 |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of 1 January 2020 | 338 | 24,659 | 23,451 |
Issuance of share capital |
|
|
|
Premium on shares issued and warrants exercised |
|
|
|
Tax (expense) / benefit |
| 4 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
Translation effects recognized directly in retained earnings |
|
| 0 |
Share of changes in retained earnings of associates and joint ventures |
|
| (40) |
New consolidations / (deconsolidations) and other increases / (decreases) |
| 0 |
|
Total comprehensive income for the period |
|
| 2,583 |
of which: net profit / (loss) |
|
| 1,421 |
of which: other comprehensive income (OCI) that may be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax |
|
|
|
of which: OCI that will not be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax – defined benefit plans |
|
| 228 |
of which: OCI that will not be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax – own credit |
|
| 934 |
of which: OCI that will not be reclassified to the income statement, net of tax – foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
Balance as of 31 March 2020 | 338 | 24,663 | 25,994 |
1 Excludes other comprehensive income related to defined benefit plans and own credit that is recorded directly in Retained earnings. |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income recognized directly in equity, net of tax1 | of which: foreign currency translation | of which: financial assets measured at fair value through OCI | of which: cash flow hedges | of which: fair value hedges of foreign currency risk | Total equity attributable to shareholders | Non-controlling interests | Total equity |
3,946 | 3,940 | (103) | 109 |
| 52,256 | 176 | 52,432 |
|
|
|
|
| (11) |
| (11) |
3,946 | 3,940 | (103) | 109 |
| 52,245 | 176 | 52,421 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | (4) | (4) |
(4) |
|
| (4) |
| 0 |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| (6) | 0 | (7) |
399 | (122) | 62 | 459 |
| 974 | 2 | 977 |
|
|
|
|
| 1,069 | (2) | 1,067 |
399 | (122) | 62 | 459 |
| 399 |
| 399 |
|
|
|
|
| (176) |
| (176) |
|
|
|
|
| (318) |
| (318) |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | 4 | 4 |
4,341 | 3,818 | (40) | 564 |
| 53,216 | 173 | 53,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,306 | 4,032 | 14 | 1,260 |
| 53,754 | 174 | 53,928 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | (3) | (3) |
0 |
| 0 | 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| (40) |
| (40) |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
1,514 | (147) | 147 | 1,505 | 8 | 4,097 | (2) | 4,095 |
|
|
|
|
| 1,421 | 3 | 1,424 |
1,514 | (147) | 147 | 1,505 | 8 | 1,514 |
| 1,514 |
|
|
|
|
| 228 |
| 228 |
|
|
|
|
| 934 |
| 934 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | (5) | (5) |
6,820 | 3,885 | 162 | 2,765 | 8 | 57,814 | 169 | 57,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Statement of cash flows |
|
|
|
|
| Year-to-date | |
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.3.19 |
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from / (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
Net profit / (loss) |
| 1,424 | 1,067 |
Non-cash items included in net profit and other adjustments: |
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment of property, equipment and software |
| 405 | 379 |
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
| 16 | 16 |
Credit loss expense / (recovery) |
| 268 | 20 |
Share of net profits of associates / joint ventures and impairment of associates |
| (16) | (15) |
Deferred tax expense / (benefit) |
| 192 | 228 |
Net loss / (gain) from investing activities |
| 84 | (73) |
Net loss / (gain) from financing activities |
| (12,586) | 4,272 |
Other net adjustments |
| (275) | 178 |
Net change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
Loans and advances to banks / amounts due to banks |
| 12,436 | (1,696) |
Securities financing transactions |
| (439) | (9,997) |
Cash collateral on derivative instruments |
| (2,034) | (131) |
Loans and advances to customers |
| (12,379) | (1,570) |
Customer deposits |
| 18,522 | 9,797 |
Financial assets and liabilities at fair value held for trading and derivative financial instruments |
| 35,457 | 1,697 |
Brokerage receivables and payables |
| (1,903) | 1,473 |
Financial assets at fair value not held for trading, other financial assets and liabilities |
| (2,399) | (1,266) |
Provisions, other non-financial assets and liabilities |
| (1,690) | (639) |
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
| (258) | (204) |
Net cash flow from / (used in) operating activities |
| 34,823 | 3,535 |
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from / (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
Purchase of subsidiaries, associates and intangible assets |
| (1) | (1) |
Disposal of subsidiaries, associates and intangible assets |
| 0 | 27 |
Purchase of property, equipment and software |
| (327) | (314) |
Disposal of property, equipment and software |
| 3 | 2 |
Purchase of financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
| (1,835) | (1,033) |
Disposal and redemption of financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 674 | 610 |
Net (purchase) / redemption of debt securities measured at amortized cost |
| 38 | 629 |
Net cash flow from / (used in) investing activities |
| (1,449) | (79) |
|
|
|
|
22
Statement of cash flows (continued) |
|
|
|
|
| Year-to-date | |
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.3.19 |
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from / (used in) financing activities |
|
|
|
Net short-term debt issued / (repaid) |
| 5,751 | (6,858) |
Repayment of lease liabilities1 |
| (135) |
|
Issuance of long-term debt, including debt issued designated at fair value |
| 21,268 | 14,704 |
Repayment of long-term debt, including debt issued designated at fair value |
| (22,703) | (10,263) |
Funding from UBS Group AG and its subsidiaries2 |
| 530 | 2,938 |
Net changes in non-controlling interests |
| (8) | (4) |
Net cash flow from / (used in) financing activities |
| 4,703 | 515 |
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
| 119,804 | 125,853 |
Net cash flow from / (used in) operating, investing and financing activities |
| 38,078 | 3,972 |
Effects of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents |
| (172) | (1,292) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period3 |
| 157,711 | 128,534 |
of which: cash and balances at central banks4 |
| 139,155 | 110,514 |
of which: loans and advances to banks |
| 16,009 | 15,735 |
of which: money market paper5 |
| 2,547 | 2,285 |
|
|
|
|
Additional information |
|
|
|
Net cash flow from / (used in) operating activities includes: |
|
|
|
Interest received in cash6 |
| 3,461 | 3,925 |
Interest paid in cash6 |
| 2,923 | 3,404 |
Dividends on equity investments, investment funds and associates received in cash |
| 727 | 1,238 |
1 In 2019 cash payments for the principal portion of the lease liability were classified within operating activities under Financial assets at fair value not held for trading, other financial assets and liabilities. 2 Includes funding from UBS Group AG and its subsidiaries measured at amortized cost (recognized in Funding from UBS Group AG and its subsidiaries in the balance sheet) and measured at fair value (recognized in Other financial liabilities designated at fair value in the balance sheet). 3 USD 4,370 million and USD 4,678 million of cash and cash equivalents (mainly reflected in Loans and advances to banks) were restricted as of 31 March 2020 and 31 March 2019, respectively. Refer to “Note 26 Restricted and transferred financial assets” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019 for more information. 4 Includes only balances with an original maturity of three months or less. 5 Money market paper is included in the balance sheet under Financial assets at fair value held for trading (31 March 2020: USD 402 million; 31 March 2019: USD 649 million), Financial assets at fair value not held for trading (31 March 2020: USD 1,729 million; 31 March 2019: USD 1,475 million), Other financial assets measured at amortized cost (31 March 2020: USD 397 million; 31 March 2019: USD 155 million) and Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (31 March 2020: USD 19 million; 31 March 2019: USD 5 million). 6 Interest received and paid in cash for the quarter ended 31 March 2019 include the total of interest on financial instruments measured at amortized cost / fair value through other comprehensive income (USD 2,637 million interest received and USD 2,082 million interest paid) and interest on financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss (USD 1,288 million interest received and USD 1,322 million interest paid). Refer to the Statement of cash flows in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019. |
23
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Notes to the UBS AG interim
consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
The consolidated financial statements (the financial statements) of UBS AG and its subsidiaries (together, UBS AG) are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the IASB), and are presented in US dollars (USD), which is also the functional currency of: UBS AG’s Head Office; UBS AG, London Branch; and UBS AG’s US-based operations. These interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting.
In preparing these interim financial statements, the same accounting policies and methods of computation have been applied as in the UBS AG consolidated annual financial statements for the period ended 31 December 2019, except for the changes described in this Note. These interim financial statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with UBS AG’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report 2019. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments were made for a fair presentation of UBS AG’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Preparation of these interim financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income, expenses and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates and assumptions are based on the best available information. Actual results in the future could differ from such estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements. Revisions to estimates, based on regular reviews, are recognized in the period in which they occur. For more information about areas of estimation uncertainty that are considered to require critical judgment, refer to “Note 1a Significant accounting policies” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments affected by the COVID-19 pandemic |
UBS AG has considered the statement made by the IASB on 27 March 2020 on accounting for expected credit losses under IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, given the uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. UBS AG has continued to comply with the requirements of IFRS 9 in arriving at an unbiased, probability-weighted estimate of expected credit losses. Appropriate judgment has been applied when determining the effects of COVID-19, given the significant uncertainty that exists, in particular when assessing future macroeconomic conditions and whether a significant increase in credit risk has occurred. In addition, effects arising from the various government support measures have been considered. ® Refer to Note 9 for more information |
Presentation of interest income and expense from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss
Effective from 1 January 2020, UBS AG presents interest income and interest expense from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss on a net basis in its income statement, in line with how UBS AG assesses and manages interest and in accordance with IFRS. This presentation change has no effect on Net interest income or on Net profit attributable to shareholders. Prior periods have been aligned with this change in presentation. Further information about net interest income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss is provided in Note 3.
Segment reporting
Effective from 1 January 2020, UBS AG only reports total operating expenses for each business division and no longer discloses a detailed cost breakdown by financial statement line item within its segment reporting disclosures provided in Note 2. This change streamlines reporting, ensures alignment with how UBS AG manages its cost base and has no effect on the income statement, or on the net profit of any business division.
In addition, UBS AG has renamed Corporate Center, including Group Treasury, Non-core and Legacy Portfolio and Group services and other, to Group Functions in order to better reflect the nature of the activities it performs.
24
Note 1 Basis of accounting (continued)
Adoption of hedge accounting requirements of IFRS 9, Financial Instruments
Application and transition effect
Effective from 1 January 2020, UBS AG has prospectively adopted the hedge accounting requirements of IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, for all of its existing hedge accounting programs, except for fair value hedges of portfolio interest rate risk, which, as permitted under IFRS 9, continue to be accounted for under IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
IFRS 9’s hedge accounting model further aligns accounting with risk management practices, amends hedge effectiveness requirements and prohibits voluntary de-designations. IFRS 9 permits the designation of certain additional hedged items, including layer components, net positions, and aggregated exposures, such as a combination of a non-derivative and derivative. IFRS 9 also introduces the concept of “cost of hedging,” under which the time value of an option contract, the forward element of a forward contract or foreign currency basis spread in a cross-currency swap can be deferred in other comprehensive income and, depending on the nature of the hedged transaction, released to the income statement either when the hedged item affects the income statement or over the term of the hedged item.
The adoption of these requirements had no financial impact on UBS AG’s financial statements. However, the adoption allows UBS AG to designate more effective hedge accounting relationships, including fair value hedges of foreign currency risk using cross-currency swaps, and to reduce income statement volatility caused by foreign currency basis spread.
Starting from 1 January 2020, UBS AG has been utilizing the concept of “cost of hedging” in its newly designated fair value hedge program of foreign currency debt using cross-currency swaps. The hedged risk is determined as changes in the value of the hedged items arising solely from changes in spot foreign exchange rates. The foreign currency basis spread in cross-currency swaps is excluded from the hedge designation and accounted for through other comprehensive income as a cost of hedging. As of 31 March 2020, the notional of hedging instruments and hedged items designated in the program amounted to USD 13.1 billion, with a gain of USD 8 million deferred in other comprehensive income as a cost of hedging.
Update to significant accounting policy – Hedge accounting (disclosed in “Note 1a item 3j Hedge accounting” in the financial statements 2019 included in the Annual Report 2019)
Hedge accounting under IFRS 9
UBS AG applies hedge accounting requirements of IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, for fair value hedges of interest rate risk related to debt instruments, fair value hedges of foreign exchange risk related to debt instruments, cash flow hedges of forecast transactions and hedges of net investments in foreign operations.
At the time a financial instrument is designated in a hedge relationship, UBS AG formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument(s) and hedged item(s), including the risk management objectives and strategy in undertaking the hedge transaction, the nature of risk being hedged and the methods that will be used to assess whether the hedge effectiveness criteria are met. As part of effectiveness testing, UBS AG assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether there is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument, including whether the relationship is dominated by the effect of credit risk and whether the appropriate hedge ratio is being used. In the case of hedging forecast transactions, the forecast transaction must be highly probable to occur. UBS AG discontinues hedge accounting when: (i) the hedge effectiveness criteria have ceased to be met; (ii) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (iii) the hedged item matures, is sold or repaid; (iv) forecast transactions are no longer deemed to meet the highly probable criteria; or (v) the risk management objective on the basis of which the hedge relationship was designated changes. Voluntary discontinuation of hedge accounting is not permitted.
Hedge ineffectiveness represents the amount by which the changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument differ from changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, or the amount by which changes in the present value of future cash flows of the hedging instrument exceed changes in the present value of expected cash flows of the hedged item. Such ineffectiveness is recorded in Other net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Fair value hedges of interest rate risk related to debt instruments
In fair value hedges of interest rate risk, the fair value change of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk is reflected as an adjustment to the carrying value of the hedged item and recognized in the income statement along with the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument. If the hedge accounting relationship is terminated for reasons other than derecognition of the hedged item, the adjustment to the carrying value is amortized to the income statement over the remaining term to maturity of the hedged item using the effective interest rate method.
25
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of accounting (continued)
Fair value hedges of foreign exchange risk related to debt instruments
In fair value hedges of foreign currency risk, the fair value change of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk is reflected in the measurement of the hedged item and recognized in the income statement along with the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument. The foreign currency basis spread of cross-currency swaps designated as hedging derivatives is excluded from the designation of fair value hedges of foreign currency risk. UBS AG has chosen to account for the foreign currency basis as a cost of hedging with amounts deferred in Other comprehensive income within Equity. These amounts are released to the income statement over the term of the hedged item or upon discontinuation of the hedge relationship.
Cash flow hedges of forecast transactions
Fair value gains or losses associated with the effective portion of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for cash flow repricing risk are recognized initially in Other comprehensive income within Equity. When the hedged forecast cash flows affect profit or loss, the associated gains or losses on the hedging derivatives are reclassified from Equity to the income statement and are presented in Interest income from derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges within Interest income from financial instruments measured at amortized cost and fair value through other comprehensive income.
If a cash flow hedge of forecast transactions is no longer considered effective, or if the hedge relationship is terminated, the cumulative gains or losses on the hedging derivatives previously reported in Other comprehensive income within Equity remain there until the committed or forecast transactions occur and affect profit or loss. If the forecast transactions are no longer expected to occur, the deferred gains or losses are immediately reclassified to the income statement.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Gains or losses on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge are
recognized directly in Other comprehensive income within Equity, whilst any gains or losses relating to the ineffective and/or undesignated portion (for example, the interest element of a forward contract) are recognized in the income statement. Upon disposal or partial disposal of the foreign operation, the cumulative value of any such gains or losses recognized in Equity associated with the entity is reclassified to Other income.
Hedge accounting under IAS 39
As permitted under IFRS 9, UBS AG continues to apply hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39 to fair value hedges of portfolio interest rate risk related to loans. As a result, the hedge accounting policy set out in the UBS AG consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report 2019 continues to apply to this program.
Conceptual Framework
Effective from 1 January 2020, UBS AG has adopted the revised version of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (the Framework), issued by the IASB in March 2018. The Framework sets out the fundamental concepts of financial reporting and acts for UBS AG as a point of reference when developing accounting policies in rare instances where a particular business transaction is not covered by existing IFRS standards. The adoption of the Framework by UBS AG had no effect on UBS AG’s financial statements.
Amendments to IFRS 3, Business Combinations
As of 1 January 2020, UBS AG has adopted Definition of a Business (Amendments to IFRS 3) for transactions with an acquisition date on or after this date. The amendments clarify the definition of a business, with the objective of assisting in the determination of whether a transaction should be accounted for as a business combination or an asset acquisition. The adoption of these amendments on 1 January 2020 had no effect on UBS AG’s financial statements.
26
UBS AG’s businesses are organized globally into four business divisions: Global Wealth Management, Personal & Corporate Banking, Asset Management and the Investment Bank. All four business divisions are supported by Group Functions and qualify as reportable segments for the purpose of segment reporting. Together with Group Functions they reflect the management structure of UBS AG.
® Refer to “Note 1a Significant accounting policies item 2” and “Note 2 Segment reporting” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019 for more information about UBS AG’s reporting segments
As outlined in Note 1, beginning with the first quarter 2020 report, UBS AG no longer discloses operating expenses by financial statement line item for each of its business divisions within its segment reporting disclosures. In addition, UBS AG has renamed Corporate Center to Group Functions in order to better reflect the nature of the activities it performs.
® Refer to Note 1 for more information
USD million |
| Global Wealth Management |
| Personal & Corporate Banking |
| Asset Management |
| Investment Bank |
| Group Functions |
| UBS AG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended 31 March 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
| 1,031 |
| 511 |
| (4) |
| (95) |
| (130) |
| 1,313 |
Non-interest income |
| 3,569 |
| 470 |
| 518 |
| 2,652 |
| (245) |
| 6,964 |
Income |
| 4,600 |
| 981 |
| 514 |
| 2,557 |
| (376) |
| 8,277 |
Credit loss (expense) / recovery |
| (53) |
| (77) |
| 0 |
| (122) |
| (16) |
| (268) |
Total operating income |
| 4,547 |
| 904 |
| 514 |
| 2,436 |
| (391) |
| 8,009 |
Total operating expenses |
| 3,347 |
| 569 |
| 357 |
| 1,757 |
| 181 |
| 6,210 |
Operating profit / (loss) before tax |
| 1,201 |
| 335 |
| 157 |
| 679 |
| (572) |
| 1,799 |
Tax expense / (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 375 |
Net profit / (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of 31 March 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
| 309,877 |
| 211,550 |
| 29,265 |
| 396,149 |
| 152,344 |
| 1,099,185 |
USD million |
| Global Wealth Management |
| Personal & Corporate Banking |
| Asset Management |
| Investment Bank |
| Group Functions |
| UBS AG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended 31 March 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
| 1,009 |
| 494 |
| (7) |
| (188) |
| (207) |
| 1,101 |
Non-interest income |
| 2,994 |
| 462 |
| 453 |
| 1,975 |
| 379 |
| 6,262 |
Income |
| 4,003 |
| 956 |
| 446 |
| 1,787 |
| 172 |
| 7,363 |
Credit loss (expense) / recovery |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| (22) |
| 0 |
| (20) |
Total operating income |
| 4,004 |
| 958 |
| 446 |
| 1,764 |
| 172 |
| 7,343 |
Total operating expenses |
| 3,156 |
| 571 |
| 343 |
| 1,577 |
| 242 |
| 5,890 |
Operating profit / (loss) before tax |
| 848 |
| 386 |
| 103 |
| 187 |
| (71) |
| 1,454 |
Tax expense / (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 387 |
Net profit / (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of 31 December 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
| 309,766 |
| 209,512 |
| 34,565 |
| 316,058 |
| 102,017 |
| 971,916 |
|
27
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Net interest income from financial instruments measured at amortized cost and fair value through other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
Interest income from loans and deposits1 |
| 1,870 | 1,919 | 2,028 |
Interest income from securities financing transactions2 |
| 367 | 440 | 498 |
Interest income from other financial instruments measured at amortized cost |
| 89 | 94 | 96 |
Interest income from debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 17 | 37 | 26 |
Interest income from derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges |
| 113 | 80 | 26 |
Total interest income from financial instruments measured at amortized cost and fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 2,457 | 2,570 | 2,674 |
Interest expense on loans and deposits3 |
| 893 | 1,032 | 1,137 |
Interest expense on securities financing transactions4 |
| 219 | 255 | 288 |
Interest expense on debt issued |
| 267 | 284 | 457 |
Interest expense on lease liabilities |
| 27 | 29 | 30 |
Total interest expense from financial instruments measured at amortized cost |
| 1,406 | 1,600 | 1,912 |
Total net interest income from financial instruments measured at amortized cost and fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 1,051 | 970 | 762 |
Net interest income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income from financial instruments at fair value held for trading |
| 202 | 241 | 434 |
Net interest income from brokerage balances |
| 137 | 127 | 77 |
Net interest income from securities financing transactions at fair value not held for trading5 |
| 33 | 36 | 30 |
Interest income from other financial instruments at fair value not held for trading |
| 202 | 222 | 220 |
Interest expense on other financial instruments designated at fair value |
| (311) | (351) | (423) |
Total net interest income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss |
| 262 | 274 | 339 |
Total net interest income |
| 1,313 | 1,244 | 1,101 |
1 Consists of interest income from cash and balances at central banks, loans and advances to banks and customers, cash collateral receivables on derivative instruments, and negative interest on amounts due to banks and customer deposits. 2 Includes interest income on receivables from securities financing transactions and negative interest, including fees, on payables from securities financing transactions. 3 Consists of interest expense on amounts due to banks, cash collateral payables on derivative instruments, customer deposits, funding from UBS Group AG and its subsidiaries, and negative interest on cash and balances at central banks, loans and advances to banks. 4 Includes interest expense on payables from securities financing transactions and negative interest, including fees, on receivables from securities financing transactions. 5 Includes interest expense on securities financing transactions designated at fair value. |
28
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Fee and commission income |
|
|
|
|
Underwriting fees |
| 203 | 196 | 180�� |
of which: equity underwriting fees |
| 106 | 122 | 48 |
of which: debt underwriting fees |
| 97 | 74 | 132 |
M&A and corporate finance fees |
| 218 | 158 | 117 |
Brokerage fees |
| 1,245 | 794 | 828 |
Investment fund fees |
| 1,295 | 1,286 | 1,177 |
Portfolio management and related services |
| 2,059 | 1,978 | 1,804 |
Other |
| 462 | 448 | 460 |
Total fee and commission income1 |
| 5,481 | 4,861 | 4,566 |
of which: recurring |
| 3,341 | 3,216 | 2,998 |
of which: transaction-based |
| 2,102 | 1,546 | 1,541 |
of which: performance-based |
| 39 | 99 | 27 |
Fee and commission expense |
|
|
|
|
Brokerage fees paid |
| 86 | 74 | 79 |
Distribution fees paid |
| 156 | 159 | 142 |
Other |
| 214 | 225 | 187 |
Total fee and commission expense |
| 456 | 458 | 409 |
Net fee and commission income |
| 5,025 | 4,403 | 4,157 |
of which: net brokerage fees |
| 1,158 | 720 | 748 |
1 Reflects third-party fee and commission income for the first quarter of 2020 of USD 3,384 million for Global Wealth Management (fourth quarter of 2019: USD 2,943 million; first quarter of 2019: USD 2,817 million), USD 354 million for Personal & Corporate Banking (fourth quarter of 2019: USD 322 million; first quarter of 2019: USD 325 million), USD 702 million for Asset Management (fourth quarter of 2019: USD 749 million; first quarter of 2019: USD 619 million), USD 1,008 million for the Investment Bank (fourth quarter of 2019: USD 814 million; first quarter of 2019: USD 783 million) and USD 33 million for Group Functions (fourth quarter of 2019: USD 32 million; first quarter of 2019: USD 22 million). |
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Associates, joint ventures and subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
Net gains / (losses) from acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries1 |
| 8 | (1) | 1 |
Net gains / (losses) from disposals of investments in associates |
| 0 | 0 | 4 |
Share of net profits of associates and joint ventures |
| 16 | 13 | 15 |
Total |
| 25 | 12 | 19 |
Net gains / (losses) from disposals of financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 9 | 4 | 1 |
Income from properties2 |
| 7 | 6 | 7 |
Net gains / (losses) from properties held for sale |
| 0 | (27) | 0 |
Income from shared services provided to UBS Group AG or its subsidiaries |
| 106 | 111 | 120 |
Other |
| 17 | 23 | 22 |
Total other income |
| 164 | 130 | 169 |
1 Includes foreign exchange gains / (losses) reclassified from other comprehensive income related to the disposal or closure of foreign operations. 2 Includes rent received from third parties. |
29
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Salaries and variable compensation |
| 2,132 | 1,831 | 2,027 |
Financial advisor compensation1 |
| 1,094 | 1,049 | 960 |
Contractors |
| 28 | 39 | 36 |
Social security |
| 164 | 149 | 170 |
Pension and other post-employment benefit plans |
| 177 | 129 | 170 |
Other personnel expenses |
| 113 | 125 | 105 |
Total personnel expenses |
| 3,710 | 3,323 | 3,468 |
1 Financial advisor compensation consists of grid-based compensation based directly on compensable revenues generated by financial advisors and supplemental compensation calculated on the basis of financial advisor productivity, firm tenure, assets and other variables. It also includes expenses related to compensation commitments with financial advisors entered into at the time of recruitment that are subject to vesting requirements. |
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Occupancy |
| 88 | 89 | 89 |
Rent and maintenance of IT and other equipment |
| 89 | 93 | 87 |
Communication and market data services |
| 124 | 126 | 131 |
Administration |
| 1,395 | 1,437 | 1,269 |
of which: shared services costs charged by UBS Group AG or its subsidiaries |
| 1,250 | 1,238 | 1,136 |
of which: UK and German bank levies |
| 15 | 61 | 15 |
Marketing and public relations |
| 39 | 84 | 50 |
Travel and entertainment |
| 58 | 84 | 77 |
Professional fees |
| 138 | 246 | 156 |
Outsourcing of IT and other services |
| 127 | 172 | 146 |
Litigation, regulatory and similar matters1 |
| 6 | 104 | (8) |
Other |
| 18 | 20 | 29 |
Total general and administrative expenses |
| 2,080 | 2,456 | 2,026 |
1 Reflects the net increase in / (release of) provisions for litigation, regulatory and similar matters recognized in the income statement. Refer to Note 15 for more information. Also includes recoveries from third parties (first quarter of 2020: USD 1 million; fourth quarter of 2019: USD 1 million; first quarter of 2019: USD 7 million). |
UBS AG recognized income tax expenses of USD 375 million for the first quarter of 2020, representing an effective tax rate of 20.8%, compared with USD 387 million for the first quarter of 2019.
Current tax expenses were USD 182 million, compared with USD 159 million, and related to taxable profits of UBS Switzerland AG and other entities.
Deferred tax expenses were USD 192 million, compared with USD 228 million. These primarily reflect the amortization of deferred tax assets (DTAs) previously recognized in relation to tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences, including the amortization of US tax loss DTAs at the level of UBS Americas Inc.
30
Total net credit loss expenses were USD 268 million during the first quarter of 2020, compared with USD 20 million during the first quarter of 2019, reflecting net expenses of USD 89 million related to stages 1 and 2 positions and net expenses of USD 179 million related to credit-impaired (stage 3) positions.
Stages 1 and 2 net credit loss expenses of USD 89 million include: (i) USD 63 million expenses that result from certain lending positions to industries and sectors that were adversely affected by COVID-19 and other market effects, in particular from energy-related exposures (USD 26 million) and securities financing transactions with a number of real estate investment trusts (USD 15 million); and (ii) USD 26 million expenses from systemic changes in scenarios and scenario weights.
Stage 3 net credit loss expenses of USD 179 million were recognized across Personal & Corporate Banking (USD 62 million), the Investment Bank (USD 60 million), Global Wealth Management (USD 41 million) and Group Functions (USD 16 million). Stage 3 expenses in Personal & Corporate Banking predominantly stem from a deterioration in the recoveries expected from loans to corporate counterparties that were already credit-impaired at year-end 2019. Stage 3 expenses in the Investment Bank include a number of credit-impaired positions from energy-related exposures (USD 44 million) and securities financing transactions with a number of real estate investment trusts (USD 16 million). Stage 3 expenses in Global Wealth Management primarily relate to a small number of collateralized lending positions. Stage 3 expenses in Group Functions arose from an energy-related exposure in the Non-core and Legacy Portfolio.
31
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 9 Expected credit loss measurement (continued)
The rapid spread of COVID-19 and the unprecedented measures taken by governments across the globe to contain the pandemic have resulted in a high degree of uncertainty regarding the economic consequences of these events. Management has assessed the situation and has exercised judgment in the absence of historic precedent, as explained below. Management has also carefully considered guidance issued by supervisory authorities concerning the interpretation of key elements of IFRS 9, Financial instruments, in the context of COVID-19. The guidance covers three main areas: (i) identification of appropriate forecasts, (ii) giving due consideration to various government support measures and (iii) identifying a significant increase in credit risk, in particular when payment holidays or other concessions may have been granted.
Identification of appropriate forecasts, scenarios and scenario weights
In the first quarter of 2020, the four scenarios and related macroeconomic factors that were applied at the end of 2019 were reviewed in light of the economic and political conditions prevailing at quarter-end through a series of extraordinary governance meetings, with input from UBS AG risk and finance experts across the regions and business divisions.
The key aspects of the narratives for the scenarios are summarized below.
– The baseline scenario was updated for 31 March 2020 and assumes a deterioration of GDP in relevant markets, especially in the US and in Switzerland, increasing unemployment, including a sharp increase in the US in the first half of 2020 to previously unseen levels, lower equity prices and higher market volatility. House prices are assumed to be largely flat in Switzerland over 2020 but to decrease in the US. Overall, modest economic improvements are expected to take place from the second half of 2020. There is, however, substantial uncertainty regarding the extent to which the baseline scenario narrative reliably captures the effects of government measures to mitigate the health and economic effects of the pandemic crisis. Consequently, there is substantial uncertainty regarding the extent to which the baseline scenario, as applied in UBS AG’s models, can reliably predict the effects of the pandemic crisis on UBS AG’s credit portfolio across divisions and regions.
– The hypothetical scenarios, in particular the upside and mild downside scenarios, are now less plausible. Given the considerable uncertainties associated with the economic conditions, an exceptional interim redesign of these scenarios was not deemed appropriate. In addition, having multiple scenarios would be speculative and compete with the probability weight estimation for the baseline and severe downside scenario. Therefore, management agreed that the upside and the mild downside narratives should not be changed at this point in time, but their probability weights should be set to zero (see further information below).
– The narrative for the severe downside scenario covers a severe recessionary phase affecting all major economies, with a wide-ranging slowdown, mainly caused by global trade tensions and debt sustainability concerns in Europe. Trade and business confidence are also affected, in particular in the key export markets for Swiss industry. The severe downside scenario is still considered appropriate in light of COVID-19, given the recessionary impacts it covers, even though the narrative is based on a different trigger for a global recession.
As a consequence of the exceptional circumstances and prevailing uncertainties at the end of the first quarter of 2020, the weight allocation between the four scenarios has shifted significantly. The upside and mild downside scenarios have been temporarily weighted with a 0% probability, with the baseline scenario weighted at 70% and the severe downside scenario at 30% to best reflect management’s current sentiment regarding the boundaries of economic outcomes. The weight allocated to the severe downside scenario is substantially higher than the 15% weight applied in the fourth quarter of 2019, as there is significant uncertainty as to whether the pandemic can be contained sufficiently early and effectively. If not, a longer-term economic shock is expected, which could not be sufficiently counteracted by government measures, or, alternatively, could lead to potentially unstable fiscal positions with far-reaching consequences. With interest rates at their current level – and further lowered in some countries – there is extremely limited room for central banks to stimulate the economy. In such a severe downside scenario, the risk significantly increases that firms, while temporarily kept afloat with liquidity lines, will encounter a deteriorating credit standing or solvency problems.
32
Note 9 Expected credit loss measurement (continued)
Economic scenarios and weights applied
ECL scenario | Assigned weights in % | |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Upside | 0.0 | 7.5 |
Baseline | 70.0 | 42.5 |
Mild downside | 0.0 | 35.0 |
Severe downside | 30.0 | 15.0 |
ECL is sensitive to changing scenario weights, in particular if narratives and parameters are selected that are not close to the baseline scenario, highlighting the non-linearity of credit losses. UBS AG reported USD 429 million ECL allowances and provisions for stages 1 and 2 positions at the end of the first quarter 2020. If UBS AG had applied a 100% weight to the baseline scenario or 100% weight to the global crisis scenario, ECL allowances and provisions would have been approximately USD 400 million and USD 600 million, respectively. If all stage 1 and 2 positions across the portfolio had been measured for lifetime ECLs irrespective of their actual SICR status with a 70% weight applied to the baseline and 30% to the severe downside scenario, ECL allowances and provisions for positions not subject to credit-impairment would have been approximately USD 900 million.
Consideration regarding the various government support measures
The effects of government support measures to address national health and economic concerns arising from the pandemic, including the provision of guaranteed credit for liquidity purposes in order to allow small and medium-sized entities and certain heavily impacted larger corporations to restart operations and to restructure damaged balance sheets, represent unknowns, given the lack of precedence and data available from a similar historical crisis. Accordingly, their effects on UBS AG’s narratives and models are difficult to quantify with any degree of confidence. UBS AG has, however, followed guidance from regulators and standard setters, who have indicated that, while government support measures should be incorporated in forward looking information, banks should not automatically move positions from stage 1 to stage 2. UBS AG has addressed these unmodelled effects where appropriate through the use of management overlays.
At the end of the first quarter, UBS AG recognized USD 1.2 billion of irrevocable loan commitments under the new Swiss government-backed facilities. No material ECL was recognized on these commitments, given the guarantee in place. However, UBS AG will closely monitor the situation, as these clients may, in the longer term, face increased pressures, affecting their ability to repay.
Identification of SICR and stage allocation
UBS AG has considered both quantitative and qualitative indicators over the expected life of an instrument, including the expected effect of government programs to support borrowers, to determine whether there is any significant increase in credit risk.
At the end of the first quarter of 2020, UBS AG was not aware of a material number of requests for payment holidays or other forbearance measures that were outside the firm’s risk appetite, and UBS AG will continue to monitor this situation closely in future quarters. UBS AG has appropriately distinguished between: borrowers with business models that are expected to be sustainable in the longer term and recover post COVID-19; clients not yet in financial difficulties, but which may face longer-term challenges and have therefore been placed on the watch list and moved to stage 2; and those which are impaired and consequently have been moved to stage 3.
® Refer to “Note 1a Significant accounting policies item 3g” and “Note 23 Expected credit loss measurement” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019 for more information
® Refer to Note 18 for more information about UBS AG's ECL
33
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 9 Expected credit loss measurement (continued)
c) ECL-relevant balance sheet and off-balance sheet positions including ECL allowances and provisions
The tables on the following pages provide information about financial instruments and certain non-financial instruments that are subject to ECL. For amortized-cost instruments, the carrying amount represents the maximum exposure to credit risk, taking into account the allowance for credit losses. Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) are also subject to ECL; however, unlike amortized-cost instruments, the allowance for credit losses for FVOCI instruments does not reduce the carrying value of these financial assets. Rather, the carrying value of financial assets measured at FVOCI represents the maximum exposure to credit risk.
In addition to on-balance sheet financial assets, certain off-balance sheet and other credit lines are also subject to ECL. The maximum exposure to credit risk for off-balance sheet financial instruments is calculated based on the maximum contractual amounts.
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | ||||||||
|
| Carrying amount1 |
| ECL allowance | ||||||
Financial instruments measured at amortized cost |
| Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
| Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
Cash and balances at central banks |
| 139,258 | 139,258 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Loans and advances to banks |
| 16,893 | 16,815 | 78 | 0 |
| (6) | (4) | (1) | (1) |
Receivables from securities financing transactions |
| 89,648 | 88,394 | 449 | 804 |
| (34) | (2) | (15) | (16) |
Cash collateral receivables on derivative instruments |
| 39,549 | 39,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Loans and advances to customers |
| 339,946 | 323,136 | 14,896 | 1,914 |
| (936) | (101) | (164) | (671) |
of which: Private clients with mortgages |
| 134,759 | 126,633 | 7,168 | 957 |
| (111) | (17) | (55) | (39) |
of which: Real estate financing |
| 39,097 | 33,876 | 5,205 | 16 |
| (49) | (6) | (39) | (4) |
of which: Large corporate clients |
| 15,343 | 14,328 | 849 | 166 |
| (191) | (21) | (35) | (134) |
of which: SME clients |
| 11,943 | 10,453 | 1,036 | 455 |
| (358) | (18) | (20) | (320) |
of which: Lombard |
| 114,401 | 114,144 | 0 | 258 |
| (56) | (10) | 0 | (46) |
of which: Credit cards |
| 1,317 | 985 | 308 | 23 |
| (34) | (7) | (14) | (14) |
of which: Commodity trade finance |
| 2,801 | 2,778 | 13 | 10 |
| (82) | (5) | 0 | (77) |
Other financial assets measured at amortized cost |
| 23,907 | 22,961 | 410 | 536 |
| (143) | (31) | (15) | (97) |
of which: Loans to financial advisors |
| 2,699 | 2,198 | 303 | 198 |
| (112) | (25) | (13) | (73) |
Total financial assets measured at amortized cost |
| 649,202 | 630,114 | 15,833 | 3,255 |
| (1,120) | (139) | (195) | (786) |
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 7,653 | 7,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total on-balance sheet financial assets in scope of ECL requirements |
| 656,855 | 637,767 | 15,833 | 3,255 |
| (1,120) | (139) | (195) | (786) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total exposure |
| ECL provision | ||||||
Off-balance sheet (in scope of ECL) |
| Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
| Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
Guarantees |
| 17,830 | 17,387 | 361 | 83 |
| (76) | (8) | (1) | (66) |
of which: Large corporate clients |
| 3,742 | 3,471 | 244 | 26 |
| (33) | (1) | 0 | (32) |
of which: SME clients |
| 1,308 | 1,185 | 67 | 56 |
| (28) | 0 | 0 | (27) |
of which: Financial intermediaries and hedge funds |
| 7,965 | 7,949 | 16 | 0 |
| (5) | (5) | 0 | 0 |
of which: Lombard |
| 603 | 603 | 0 | 0 |
| (7) | 0 | 0 | (7) |
of which: Commodity trade finance |
| 1,967 | 1,951 | 16 | 0 |
| (1) | (1) | 0 | 0 |
Irrevocable loan commitments |
| 28,334 | 27,701 | 550 | 84 |
| (46) | (34) | (13) | 0 |
of which: Large corporate clients |
| 18,224 | 17,712 | 453 | 59 |
| (33) | (26) | (7) | 0 |
Forward starting reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements |
| 5,123 | 5,123 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Committed unconditionally revocable credit lines |
| 36,374 | 35,396 | 942 | 35 |
| (36) | (20) | (16) | 0 |
of which: Real estate financing |
| 4,989 | 4,679 | 310 | 0 |
| (16) | (3) | (12) | 0 |
of which: Large corporate clients |
| 3,784 | 3,697 | 70 | 17 |
| (2) | (1) | 0 | 0 |
of which: SME clients |
| 4,644 | 4,492 | 133 | 18 |
| (10) | (9) | (1) | 0 |
of which: Lombard |
| 7,649 | 7,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | (1) | 0 | 0 |
of which: Credit cards |
| 8,295 | 7,923 | 371 | 0 |
| (5) | (4) | (2) | 0 |
Irrevocable committed prolongation of existing loans |
| 4,040 | 4,038 | 0 | 2 |
| (4) | (4) | 0 | 0 |
Total off-balance sheet financial instruments and other credit lines |
| 91,701 | 89,644 | 1,852 | 204 |
| (162) | (66) | (29) | (66) |
Total allowances and provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1,282) | (205) | (225) | (852) |
1 The carrying amount of financial assets measured at amortized cost represents the total gross exposure net of the respective ECL allowances. |
34
Note 9 Expected credit loss measurement (continued)
USD million |
| 31.12.19 | ||||||||
|
| Carrying amount1 |
| ECL allowance | ||||||
Financial instruments measured at amortized cost |
| Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
| Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
Cash and balances at central banks |
| 107,068 | 107,068 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Loans and advances to banks |
| 12,379 | 12,298 | 80 | 0 |
| (6) | (4) | (1) | (1) |
Receivables from securities financing transactions |
| 84,245 | 84,245 | 0 | 0 |
| (2) | (2) | 0 | 0 |
Cash collateral receivables on derivative instruments |
| 23,289 | 23,289 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Loans and advances to customers |
| 327,992 | 310,705 | 15,538 | 1,749 |
| (764) | (82) | (123) | (559) |
of which: Private clients with mortgages |
| 132,646 | 124,063 | 7,624 | 959 |
| (110) | (15) | (55) | (41) |
of which: Real estate financing |
| 38,481 | 32,932 | 5,532 | 17 |
| (43) | (5) | (34) | (4) |
of which: Large corporate clients |
| 9,703 | 9,184 | 424 | 94 |
| (117) | (15) | (4) | (98) |
of which: SME clients |
| 11,786 | 9,817 | 1,449 | 521 |
| (303) | (17) | (15) | (271) |
of which: Lombard |
| 112,893 | 112,796 | 0 | 98 |
| (22) | (4) | 0 | (18) |
of which: Credit cards |
| 1,661 | 1,314 | 325 | 22 |
| (35) | (8) | (14) | (13) |
of which: Commodity trade finance |
| 2,844 | 2,826 | 8 | 10 |
| (81) | (5) | 0 | (77) |
Other financial assets measured at amortized cost |
| 23,012 | 21,985 | 451 | 576 |
| (143) | (35) | (13) | (95) |
of which: Loans to financial advisors |
| 2,877 | 2,341 | 334 | 202 |
| (109) | (29) | (11) | (70) |
Total financial assets measured at amortized cost |
| 577,985 | 559,590 | 16,069 | 2,326 |
| (915) | (124) | (137) | (655) |
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 6,345 | 6,345 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total on-balance sheet financial assets in scope of ECL requirements |
| 584,329 | 565,935 | 16,069 | 2,326 |
| (915) | (124) | (137) | (655) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total exposure |
| ECL provision | ||||||
Off-balance sheet (in scope of ECL) |
| Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
| Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
Guarantees |
| 18,142 | 17,757 | 304 | 82 |
| (42) | (8) | (1) | (33) |
of which: Large corporate clients |
| 3,687 | 3,461 | 203 | 24 |
| (10) | (1) | 0 | (9) |
of which: SME clients |
| 1,180 | 1,055 | 67 | 58 |
| (24) | 0 | 0 | (23) |
of which: Financial intermediaries and hedge funds |
| 7,966 | 7,950 | 16 | 0 |
| (5) | (4) | 0 | 0 |
of which: Lombard |
| 622 | 622 | 0 | 0 |
| (1) | 0 | 0 | (1) |
of which: Commodity trade finance |
| 2,334 | 2,320 | 13 | 0 |
| (1) | (1) | 0 | 0 |
Irrevocable loan commitments |
| 27,547 | 27,078 | 419 | 50 |
| (35) | (30) | (5) | 0 |
of which: Large corporate clients |
| 18,735 | 18,349 | 359 | 27 |
| (27) | (24) | (3) | 0 |
Forward starting reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements |
| 1,657 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Committed unconditionally revocable credit lines |
| 36,979 | 35,735 | 1,197 | 46 |
| (34) | (17) | (17) | 0 |
of which: Real estate financing |
| 5,242 | 4,934 | 307 | 0 |
| (16) | (3) | (13) | 0 |
of which: Large corporate clients |
| 4,274 | 4,188 | 69 | 17 |
| (1) | (1) | 0 | 0 |
of which: SME clients |
| 4,787 | 4,589 | 171 | 27 |
| (9) | (8) | (1) | 0 |
of which: Lombard |
| 7,976 | 7,975 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
of which: Credit cards |
| 7,890 | 7,535 | 355 | 0 |
| (6) | (4) | (2) | 0 |
of which: Commodity trade finance |
| 344 | 344 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Irrevocable committed prolongation of existing loans |
| 3,289 | 3,285 | 0 | 4 |
| (3) | (3) | 0 | 0 |
Total off-balance sheet financial instruments and other credit lines |
| 87,614 | 85,513 | 1,920 | 182 |
| (114) | (58) | (23) | (33) |
Total allowances and provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1,029) | (181) | (160) | (688) |
1 The carrying amount of financial assets measured at amortized cost represents the total gross exposure net of the respective ECL allowances. |
35
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
This Note provides fair value measurement information for both financial and non-financial instruments and should be read in conjunction with “Note 24 Fair value measurement” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019, which provides more information about valuation principles, valuation governance, fair value hierarchy classification, valuation adjustments, valuation techniques and inputs, sensitivity of fair value measurements, and methods applied to calculate fair values for financial instruments not measured at fair value.
All financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value are categorized into one of three fair value hierarchy levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, the level in the hierarchy within which the instrument is classified in its entirety is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the position’s fair value measurement:
– Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
– Level 2: valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are, or are based on, observable market data; or
– Level 3: valuation techniques for which significant inputs are not based on observable market data.
During the first quarter of 2020, the significant levels of market activity, reflecting the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulted in a number of notable quarter-on-quarter variances. The main movements were the following:
Financial assets at fair value held for trading decreased by USD 37 billion, mainly in the Investment Bank, primarily reflecting a reduction in inventory levels to increase funding available for its business activities as well as market-driven movements.
Derivative financial assets increased by USD 91 billion and derivative financial liabilities increased by USD 86 billion, in a volatile market environment, primarily reflecting market-driven movements in foreign exchange and equity / index contracts in our Derivatives & Solutions and Financing businesses in the Investment Bank.
Debt issued designated at fair value decreased by
USD 14 billion, reflecting market-driven movements and a significant widening of UBS AG’s credit spreads.
36
Note 10 Fair value measurement (continued)
The fair value hierarchy classification of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value is summarized in the table below.
Determination of fair values from quoted market prices or valuation techniques1 | ||||||||||
|
| 31.3.20 |
| 31.12.19 | ||||||
USD million |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value held for trading |
| 73,687 | 14,982 | 2,018 | 90,686 |
| 113,635 | 12,248 | 1,812 | 127,695 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity instruments |
| 54,960 | 535 | 185 | 55,680 |
| 96,162 | 400 | 226 | 96,788 |
Government bills / bonds |
| 11,017 | 2,826 | 9 | 13,852 |
| 9,630 | 1,770 | 64 | 11,464 |
Investment fund units |
| 7,077 | 1,556 | 21 | 8,654 |
| 7,088 | 1,729 | 50 | 8,867 |
Corporate and municipal bonds |
| 618 | 8,432 | 498 | 9,549 |
| 755 | 6,796 | 542 | 8,093 |
Loans |
| 0 | 1,205 | 1,120 | 2,325 |
| 0 | 1,180 | 791 | 1,971 |
Asset-backed securities |
| 16 | 428 | 184 | 628 |
| 0 | 372 | 140 | 512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
| 1,193 | 209,349 | 2,445 | 212,986 |
| 356 | 120,224 | 1,264 | 121,843 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
| 635 | 94,070 | 26 | 94,731 |
| 240 | 52,228 | 8 | 52,476 |
Interest rate contracts |
| 20 | 55,402 | 418 | 55,839 |
| 6 | 42,288 | 263 | 42,558 |
Equity / index contracts |
| 4 | 53,989 | 1,301 | 55,294 |
| 7 | 22,220 | 597 | 22,825 |
Credit derivative contracts |
| 0 | 1,574 | 669 | 2,243 |
| 0 | 1,612 | 394 | 2,007 |
Commodity contracts |
| 0 | 3,909 | 6 | 3,915 |
| 0 | 1,820 | 0 | 1,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage receivables |
| 0 | 20,319 | 0 | 20,319 |
| 0 | 18,007 | 0 | 18,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value not held for trading |
| 39,666 | 39,125 | 3,699 | 82,490 |
| 40,608 | 39,065 | 3,962 | 83,636 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets for unit-linked investment contracts |
| 22,826 | 0 | 0 | 22,826 |
| 27,568 | 118 | 0 | 27,686 |
Corporate and municipal bonds |
| 655 | 19,753 | 0 | 20,408 |
| 653 | 18,732 | 0 | 19,385 |
Government bills / bonds |
| 15,954 | 3,853 | 0 | 19,808 |
| 12,089 | 3,700 | 0 | 15,790 |
Loans |
| 0 | 8,390 | 1,081 | 9,470 |
| 0 | 10,206 | 1,231 | 11,438 |
Securities financing transactions |
| 0 | 6,909 | 147 | 7,056 |
| 0 | 6,148 | 147 | 6,294 |
Auction rate securities |
| 0 | 0 | 1,393 | 1,393 |
| 0 | 0 | 1,536 | 1,536 |
Investment fund units |
| 138 | 132 | 107 | 378 |
| 194 | 140 | 98 | 432 |
Equity instruments |
| 93 | 3 | 454 | 549 |
| 103 | 4 | 451 | 559 |
Other |
| 0 | 84 | 518 | 602 |
| 0 | 16 | 499 | 515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income on a recurring basis | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
| 1,651 | 6,002 | 0 | 7,653 |
| 1,906 | 4,439 | 0 | 6,345 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities |
| 0 | 5,507 | 0 | 5,507 |
| 0 | 3,955 | 0 | 3,955 |
Government bills / bonds |
| 1,613 | 92 | 0 | 1,705 |
| 1,859 | 16 | 0 | 1,875 |
Corporate and municipal bonds |
| 38 | 404 | 0 | 441 |
| 47 | 468 | 0 | 515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precious metals and other physical commodities |
| 4,050 | 0 | 0 | 4,050 |
| 4,597 | 0 | 0 | 4,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-financial assets2 |
| 0 | 0 | 202 | 202 |
| 0 | 0 | 199 | 199 |
Total assets measured at fair value |
| 120,247 | 289,776 | 8,364 | 418,386 |
| 161,102 | 193,983 | 7,237 | 362,322 |
37
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 10 Fair value measurement (continued)
Determination of fair values from quoted market prices or valuation techniques (continued)1 | ||||||||||
|
| 31.3.20 |
| 31.12.19 | ||||||
USD million |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at fair value held for trading |
| 26,965 | 5,464 | 143 | 32,572 |
| 25,791 | 4,726 | 75 | 30,591 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity instruments |
| 22,289 | 283 | 26 | 22,599 |
| 22,526 | 149 | 59 | 22,734 |
Corporate and municipal bonds |
| 22 | 3,921 | 74 | 4,018 |
| 40 | 3,606 | 16 | 3,661 |
Government bills / bonds |
| 3,880 | 710 | 0 | 4,590 |
| 2,820 | 646 | 0 | 3,466 |
Investment fund units |
| 774 | 532 | 43 | 1,349 |
| 404 | 294 | 0 | 698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
| 1,246 | 201,775 | 3,633 | 206,654 |
| 385 | 118,498 | 1,996 | 120,880 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
| 636 | 92,516 | 65 | 93,218 |
| 248 | 53,705 | 60 | 54,013 |
Interest rate contracts |
| 6 | 49,780 | 892 | 50,678 |
| 7 | 36,434 | 130 | 36,571 |
Equity / index contracts |
| 4 | 53,968 | 1,557 | 55,528 |
| 3 | 24,171 | 1,293 | 25,468 |
Credit derivative contracts |
| 0 | 1,875 | 1,065 | 2,940 |
| 0 | 2,448 | 512 | 2,960 |
Commodity contracts |
| 0 | 3,437 | 0 | 3,438 |
| 0 | 1,707 | 0 | 1,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities designated at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage payables designated at fair value |
| 0 | 37,652 | 0 | 37,652 |
| 0 | 37,233 | 0 | 37,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issued designated at fair value |
| 0 | 46,013 | 7,027 | 53,040 |
| 0 | 56,943 | 9,649 | 66,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value |
| 0 | 30,309 | 1,485 | 31,794 |
| 0 | 35,119 | 1,039 | 36,157 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities related to unit-linked investment contracts |
| 0 | 23,150 | 0 | 23,150 |
| 0 | 28,145 | 0 | 28,145 |
Securities financing transactions |
| 0 | 5,992 | 0 | 5,992 |
| 0 | 5,742 | 0 | 5,742 |
Over-the-counter debt instruments |
| 0 | 1,159 | 1,138 | 2,297 |
| 0 | 1,231 | 791 | 2,022 |
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
| 28,211 | 321,213 | 12,289 | 361,713 |
| 26,176 | 252,518 | 12,759 | 291,452 |
1 Bifurcated embedded derivatives are presented on the same balance sheet lines as their host contracts and are not included in this table. The fair value of these derivatives was not material for the periods presented. 2 Other non-financial assets primarily consist of properties and other non-current assets held for sale, which are measured at the lower of their net carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. |
Deferred day-1 profit or loss reserves
The table below summarizes the changes in deferred day-1 profit or loss reserves during the relevant period.
Deferred day-1 profit or loss is generally released into Other net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss when pricing of equivalent products or the underlying parameters become observable or when the transaction is closed out.
Deferred day-1 profit or loss reserves |
| |||
|
| For the quarter ended | ||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Reserve balance at the beginning of the period |
| 146 | 131 | 255 |
Profit / (loss) deferred on new transactions |
| 118 | 48 | 33 |
(Profit) / loss recognized in the income statement |
| (69) | (33) | (126) |
Foreign currency translation |
| (1) | 0 | (1) |
Reserve balance at the end of the period |
| 194 | 146 | 161 |
38
Note 10 Fair value measurement (continued)
Own credit
The valuation of financial liabilities designated at fair value requires consideration of the own credit component of fair value. Own credit risk is reflected in the valuation of UBS AG’s fair value option liabilities where this component is considered relevant for valuation purposes by UBS AG’s counterparties and other market participants. However, own credit risk is not reflected in the valuation of UBS AG’s liabilities that are fully collateralized or for other obligations for which it is established market practice to not include an own credit component.
The description of UBS AG’s methodology to estimate own credit and the related accounting principles is included in “Note 24 Fair value measurement” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019.
In the first quarter of 2020, other comprehensive income related to own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value was positive USD 1,156 million, primarily due to a significant widening of UBS’s credit spreads driven by economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Own credit adjustments on financial liabilities designated at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| For the quarter ended | |||
|
| Included in Other comprehensive income | |||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 |
| 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Recognized during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain / (loss) |
| 1 |
| 2 | 0 |
Unrealized gain / (loss) |
| 1,156 |
| (149) | (326) |
Total gain / (loss), before tax |
| 1,156 |
| (147) | (326) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of | |||
USD million |
| 31.3.20 |
| 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
Recognized on the balance sheet as of the end of the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized life-to-date gain / (loss) |
| 1,069 |
| (88) | (6) |
Credit, funding, debit and other valuation adjustments
A description of UBS AG’s methodology for estimating credit valuation adjustments (CVAs), funding valuation adjustments (FVAs), debit valuation adjustments (DVAs) and other valuation adjustments is included in “Note 24 Fair value measurement” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019.
In the first quarter of 2020, life-to-date losses for CVAs and FVAs increased due to higher credit and funding spreads as a result of the adverse economic developments and the sharp decline in market valuations driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. Other valuation adjustments for liquidity and model uncertainty also increased due to higher volatility risk as a result of market uncertainty.
Valuation adjustments on financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
| As of | |
Life-to-date gain / (loss), USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Credit valuation adjustments1 |
| (92) | (48) |
Funding valuation adjustments2 |
| (378) | (93) |
Debit valuation adjustments |
| 2 | 1 |
Other valuation adjustments |
| (879) | (566) |
of which: liquidity |
| (536) | (300) |
of which: model uncertainty |
| (343) | (266) |
1 Amounts do not include reserves against defaulted counterparties. 2 Includes FVAs on structured financing transactions of USD 194 million as of 31 March 2020 and USD 43 million as of 31 December 2019. |
The amounts disclosed in this section reflect transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for instruments that were held for the entire reporting period.
Assets and liabilities transferred from Level 2 to Level 1 during the first quarter of 2020 or from Level 1 to Level 2 during the first quarter of 2020 were not material.
39
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 10 Fair value measurement (continued)
The table below presents significant Level 3 assets and liabilities together with the valuation techniques used to measure fair value, the significant inputs used in the valuation technique that are considered unobservable and a range of values for those unobservable inputs.
The range of values represents the highest- and lowest-level input used in the valuation techniques. Therefore, the range does not reflect the level of uncertainty regarding a particular input, but rather the different underlying characteristics of the relevant assets and liabilities. The ranges will therefore vary from period to period and parameter to parameter based on characteristics of the instruments held at each balance sheet date. Furthermore, the ranges and weighted averages of unobservable inputs may differ across other financial institutions due to the diversity of the products in each firm’s inventory.
The significant unobservable inputs disclosed in the table below are consistent with those included in “Note 24 Fair value measurement” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019. A description of the potential effect that a change in each unobservable input in isolation may have on a fair value measurement, including information to facilitate an understanding of factors that give rise to the input ranges shown, is also provided in “Note 24 Fair value measurement” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019.
Valuation techniques and inputs used in the fair value measurement of Level 3 assets and liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
| Fair value |
|
|
| Significant unobservable input(s)1 | Range of inputs | |||||||||||
| Assets |
| Liabilities |
| Valuation technique(s) |
| 31.3.20 |
| 31.12.19 |
| |||||||
USD billion | 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
|
| low | high | weighted average2 |
| low | high | weighted average2 | unit1 | ||
Financial assets and liabilities at fair value held for trading and Financial assets at fair value not held for trading | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate and municipal bonds | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Relative value to market comparable |
| Bond price equivalent | 0 | 143 | 94 |
| 0 | 143 | 101 | points |
Traded loans, loans designated at fair value, loan commitments and guarantees | 2.6 | 2.4 |
| 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Relative value to market comparable |
| Loan price equivalent | 0 | 100 | 99 |
| 0 | 101 | 99 | points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discounted expected cash flows |
| Credit spread | 250 | 1,000 |
|
| 225 | 530 |
| basis points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Market comparable and securitization model |
| Discount margin | 1 | 15 | 3 |
| 0 | 14 | 2 | % |
Auction rate securities | 1.4 | 1.5 |
|
|
|
| Relative value to market comparable |
| Bond price equivalent | 79 | 91 | 80 |
| 79 | 98 | 88 | points |
Investment fund units3 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Relative value to market comparable |
| Net asset value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity instruments3 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Relative value to market comparable |
| Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issued designated at fair value4 |
|
|
| 7.0 | 9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value |
|
|
| 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Discounted expected cash flows |
| Funding spread | 45 | 175 |
|
| 44 | 175 |
| basis points |
Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| 0.9 | 0.1 |
| Option model |
| Volatility of interest rates | 42 | 90 |
|
| 15 | 63 |
| basis points |
Credit derivative contracts | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| 1.1 | 0.5 |
| Discounted expected cash flows |
| Credit spreads | (10) | 688 |
|
| 1 | 700 |
| basis points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bond price equivalent | 0 | 100 |
|
| 0 | 100 |
| points |
Equity / index contracts | 1.3 | 0.6 |
| 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Option model |
| Equity dividend yields | 0 | 20 |
|
| 0 | 14 |
| % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Volatility of equity stocks, equity and other indices | 4 | 130 |
|
| 4 | 105 |
| % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity-to-FX correlation | (45) | 71 |
|
| (45) | 71 |
| % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity-to-equity correlation | (17) | 99 |
|
| (17) | 98 |
| % |
1 The ranges of significant unobservable inputs are represented in points, percentages and basis points. Points are a percentage of par (e.g., 100 points would be 100% of par). 2 Weighted averages are provided for non-derivative financial instruments and were calculated by weighting inputs based on the fair values of the respective instruments. Weighted averages are not provided for inputs related to derivative contracts as this would not be meaningful. 3 The range of inputs is not disclosed as there is a dispersion of values given the diverse nature of the investments. 4 Valuation techniques, significant unobservable inputs and the respective input ranges for Debt issued designated at fair value are the same as the equivalent derivative instruments presented elsewhere in this table. |
40
Note 10 Fair value measurement (continued)
The table below summarizes those financial assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 for which a change in one or more of the unobservable inputs to reflect reasonably possible alternative assumptions would change fair value significantly, and the estimated effect thereof.
The table shown presents the favorable and unfavorable effects for each class of financial assets and liabilities for which the potential change in fair value is considered significant. The sensitivity of fair value measurements for debt issued designated at fair value and over-the-counter debt instruments designated at fair value is reported with the equivalent derivative or structured financing instrument within the table below.
The sensitivity data shown below presents an estimation of valuation uncertainty based on reasonably possible alternative values for Level 3 inputs at the balance sheet date and does not represent the estimated effect of stress scenarios. Typically, these financial assets and liabilities are sensitive to a combination of inputs from Levels 1–3. Although well-defined interdependencies may exist between Levels 1–2 and Level 3 parameters (e.g., between interest rates, which are generally Level 1 or Level 2, and prepayments, which are generally Level 3), these have not been incorporated in the table. Furthermore, direct interrelationships between the Level 3 parameters are not a significant element of the valuation uncertainty.
Sensitivity of fair value measurements to changes in unobservable input assumptions |
|
|
| |||
|
| 31.3.20 |
| 31.12.19 | ||
USD million |
| Favorable changes | Unfavorable changes |
| Favorable changes | Unfavorable changes |
Traded loans, loans designated at fair value, loan commitments and guarantees |
| 165 | (209) |
| 46 | (21) |
Securities financing transactions |
| 35 | (33) |
| 11 | (11) |
Auction rate securities |
| 105 | (105) |
| 87 | (87) |
Asset-backed securities |
| 42 | (51) |
| 35 | (40) |
Equity instruments |
| 150 | (82) |
| 140 | (80) |
Interest rate derivative contracts, net |
| 16 | (20) |
| 8 | (17) |
Credit derivative contracts, net |
| 34 | (38) |
| 31 | (35) |
Foreign exchange derivative contracts, net |
| 15 | (13) |
| 12 | (8) |
Equity / index derivative contracts, net |
| 362 | (429) |
| 183 | (197) |
Other |
| 48 | (50) |
| 47 | (51) |
Total |
| 972 | (1,028) |
| 600 | (547) |
|
Significant changes in Level 3 instruments
The table on the following pages presents additional information about significant Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Level 3 assets and liabilities may be hedged with instruments classified as Level 1 or Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and, as a result, realized and unrealized gains and losses included in the table may not comprise the effect of related hedging activity. Furthermore, the realized and unrealized gains and losses presented within the table are not limited solely to those arising from Level 3 inputs, as valuations are generally derived from both observable and unobservable parameters.
41
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 10 Fair value measurement (continued)
Movements of Level 3 instruments1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Total gains / losses included in comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
USD billion | Balance as of 31 December 2018 | Net gains / losses included in income2 | of which: related to Level 3 instruments held at the end of the reporting period | Purchases | Sales | Issuances | Settlements | Transfers into Level 3 | Transfers out of Level 3 | Foreign currency translation | Balance as of 31 March 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value held for trading | 2.0 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.2 | (0.9) | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 2.3 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment fund units | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Corporate and municipal bonds | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.4 |
Loans | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.5) | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 |
Other | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments – assets | 1.4 | (0.1) | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | (0.3) | 0.0 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 1.4 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
Equity / index contracts | 0.5 | (0.1) | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.0 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.4 |
Credit derivative contracts | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
Other | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value not held for trading | 4.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | (0.4) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (0.9) | 0.0 | 3.7 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | (0.3) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (0.9) | 0.0 | 1.1 |
Auction rate securities | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 |
Equity instruments | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
Other | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments – liabilities | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | (0.3) | 0.0 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 2.1 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Equity / index contracts | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | (0.2) | 0.0 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 1.3 |
Credit derivative contracts | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
Other | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Debt issued designated at fair value | 11.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 | (1.0) | 0.2 | (1.0) | 0.0 | 12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.5) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 |
1 In the first quarter of 2020, UBS AG has enhanced its disclosure of Level 3 movements by excluding from the table the impacts of instruments purchased during the period and sold prior to the end of the period. Prior-period comparatives have been restated accordingly. 2 Net gains / losses included in comprehensive income are comprised of Net interest income, Other net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss and Other income. 3 Total Level 3 assets as of 31 March 2020 were USD 8.4 billion (31 December 2019: USD 7.2 billion). Total Level 3 liabilities as of 31 March 2020 were USD 12.3 billion (31 December 2019: USD 12.8 billion). |
42
Note 10 Fair value measurement (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total gains / losses included in comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance as of 31 December 20193 | Net gains / losses included in income2 | of which: related to Level 3 instruments held at the end of the reporting period | Purchases | Sales | Issuances | Settlements | Transfers into Level 3 | Transfers out of Level 3 | Foreign currency translation | Balance as of 31 March 20203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 | (0.1) | (0.1) | 0.4 | (1.1) | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.3) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
0.8 | 0.0 | (0.1) | 0.1 | (0.5) | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | (0.3) | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 | (0.2) | (0.2) | 0.3 | (0.3) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 | (0.1) | (0.1) | 0.3 | (0.3) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
1.5 | (0.1) | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 |
0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
0.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | (0.2) | 0.8 | (0.1) | (0.1) | 3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 |
1.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 |
0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.1) | 0.4 | (0.1) | 0.0 | 1.1 |
0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
9.6 | (1.0) | (1.0) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | (3.2) | 0.3 | (0.8) | (0.1) | 7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 |
|
43
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 10 Fair value measurement (continued)
Assets and liabilities transferred into or out of Level 3 are presented as if those assets or liabilities had been transferred at the beginning of the year.
Assets transferred into and out of Level 3 in the first three months of 2020 totaled USD 0.3 billion and USD 0.1 billion, respectively. Transfers into Level 3 mainly consisted of corporate and municipal bonds, reflecting decreased observability of the relevant valuation inputs.
Liabilities transferred into and out of Level 3 in the first three months of 2020 totaled USD 1.0 billion and USD 0.9 billion, respectively. Transfers into Level 3 mainly consisted of credit and interest rate derivative contracts due to decreased observability of the relevant valuation inputs. Transfers out of Level 3 mainly consisted of debt issued designated at fair value, primarily equity-linked issued debt instruments, due to increased observability of the embedded derivative inputs.
The table below reflects the estimated fair values of financial instruments not measured at fair value.
Financial instruments not measured at fair value | ||||||
|
| 31.3.20 |
| 31.12.19 | ||
USD billion |
| Carrying amount | Fair value |
| Carrying amount | Fair value |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central banks |
| 139.3 | 139.3 |
| 107.1 | 107.1 |
Loans and advances to banks |
| 16.9 | 16.9 |
| 12.4 | 12.4 |
Receivables from securities financing transactions |
| 89.6 | 89.7 |
| 84.2 | 84.2 |
Cash collateral receivables on derivative instruments |
| 39.5 | 39.5 |
| 23.3 | 23.3 |
Loans and advances to customers |
| 339.9 | 341.8 |
| 328.0 | 330.3 |
Other financial assets measured at amortized cost |
| 23.9 | 24.7 |
| 23.0 | 23.3 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to banks |
| 18.8 | 18.8 |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
Payables from securities financing transactions |
| 12.9 | 12.9 |
| 7.8 | 7.8 |
Cash collateral payables on derivative instruments |
| 45.6 | 45.6 |
| 31.4 | 31.4 |
Customer deposits |
| 468.4 | 468.5 |
| 450.6 | 450.7 |
Funding from UBS Group AG and its subsidiaries |
| 49.2 | 46.6 |
| 47.9 | 49.6 |
Debt issued measured at amortized cost |
| 66.5 | 66.7 |
| 62.8 | 64.3 |
Other financial liabilities measured at amortized cost1 |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| 6.5 | 6.5 |
1 Excludes lease liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values included in the table above have been calculated for disclosure purposes only. The fair value valuation techniques and assumptions relate only to the fair value of UBS AG’s financial instruments not measured at fair value. Other institutions may use different methods and assumptions for their fair value estimation, and therefore such fair value disclosures cannot necessarily be compared from one financial institution to another.
44
As of 31.3.20, USD billion |
| Derivative financial assets | Notional values related to derivative financial assets3 | Derivative financial liabilities | Notional values related to derivative financial liabilities3 | Other notional values4 |
Derivative financial instruments1,2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
| 55.8 | 971 | 50.7 | 924 | 12,095 |
Credit derivative contracts |
| 2.2 | 81 | 2.9 | 68 | 0 |
Foreign exchange contracts |
| 94.7 | 3,413 | 93.2 | 3,221 | 2 |
Equity / index contracts |
| 55.3 | 422 | 55.5 | 487 | 111 |
Commodity contracts |
| 3.9 | 73 | 3.4 | 70 | 11 |
Unsettled purchases of non-derivative financial instruments5 |
| 0.4 | 38 | 0.4 | 16 |
|
Unsettled sales of non-derivative financial instruments5 |
| 0.5 | 39 | 0.5 | 22 |
|
Total derivative financial instruments, based on IFRS netting6 |
| 213.0 | 5,037 | 206.7 | 4,807 | 12,219 |
Further netting potential not recognized on the balance sheet7 |
| (193.2) |
| (186.6) |
|
|
of which: netting of recognized financial liabilities / assets |
| (160.7) |
| (160.7) |
|
|
of which: netting with collateral received / pledged |
| (32.5) |
| (25.9) |
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments, after consideration of further netting potential |
| 19.8 |
| 20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of 31.12.19, USD billion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments1,2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
| 42.6 | 1,007 | 36.6 | 961 | 11,999 |
Credit derivative contracts |
| 2.0 | 70 | 3.0 | 70 | 0 |
Foreign exchange contracts |
| 52.5 | 3,174 | 54.0 | 2,994 | 1 |
Equity / index contracts |
| 22.8 | 420 | 25.5 | 534 | 122 |
Commodity contracts |
| 1.8 | 56 | 1.7 | 60 | 13 |
Unsettled purchases of non-derivative financial instruments5 |
| 0.1 | 17 | 0.1 | 7 |
|
Unsettled sales of non-derivative financial instruments5 |
| 0.1 | 15 | 0.1 | 10 |
|
Total derivative financial instruments, based on IFRS netting6 |
| 121.8 | 4,759 | 120.9 | 4,635 | 12,135 |
Further netting potential not recognized on the balance sheet7 |
| (110.7) |
| (106.1) |
|
|
of which: netting of recognized financial liabilities / assets |
| (89.3) |
| (89.3) |
|
|
of which: netting with collateral received / pledged |
| (21.4) |
| (16.8) |
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments, after consideration of further netting potential |
| 11.1 |
| 14.8 |
|
|
1 Derivative financial liabilities as of 31 March 2020 include USD 43 million related to derivative loan commitments (31 December 2019: USD 17 million). No notional amounts related to these commitments are included in this table, but they are disclosed in Note 16 under Loan commitments. 2 Includes certain forward starting repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements that are classified as measured at fair value through profit or loss and are recognized within derivative instruments. The fair value of these derivative instruments was not material as of 31 March 2020 or 31 December 2019. No notional amounts related to these instruments are included in this table, but they are disclosed within Note 16 under Forward starting transactions. 3 In cases where derivative financial instruments are presented on a net basis on the balance sheet, the respective notional values of the netted derivative financial instruments are still presented on a gross basis. 4 Other notional values relate to derivatives that are cleared through either a central counterparty or an exchange. The fair value of these derivatives is presented on the balance sheet net of the corresponding cash margin under Cash collateral receivables on derivative instruments and Cash collateral payables on derivative instruments and was not material for all periods presented. 5 Changes in the fair value of purchased and sold non-derivative financial instruments between trade date and settlement date are recognized as derivative financial instruments. 6 Financial assets and liabilities are presented net on the balance sheet if UBS AG has the unconditional and legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts, both in the normal course of business and in the event of default, bankruptcy or insolvency of the entity and all of the counterparties, and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. 7 Reflects the netting potential in accordance with enforceable master netting and similar arrangements where not all criteria for a net presentation on the balance sheet have been met. Refer to “Note 25 Offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019 for more information. |
45
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 11 Derivative instruments (continued)
USD billion |
| Receivables 31.3.20 | Payables 31.3.20 |
| Receivables 31.12.19 | Payables 31.12.19 |
Cash collateral on derivative instruments, based on IFRS netting1 |
| 39.5 | 45.6 |
| 23.3 | 31.4 |
Further netting potential not recognized on the balance sheet2 |
| (21.7) | (24.2) |
| (14.4) | (18.1) |
of which: netting of recognized financial liabilities / assets |
| (19.6) | (21.8) |
| (13.3) | (16.5) |
of which: netting with collateral received / pledged |
| (2.1) | (2.4) |
| (1.1) | (1.7) |
Cash collateral on derivative instruments, after consideration of further netting potential |
| 17.9 | 21.5 |
| 8.9 | 13.3 |
1 Financial assets and liabilities are presented net on the balance sheet if UBS AG has the unconditional and legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts, both in the normal course of business and in the event of default, bankruptcy or insolvency of UBS AG or its counterparties, and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. 2 Reflects the netting potential in accordance with enforceable master netting and similar arrangements where not all criteria for a net presentation on the balance sheet have been met. Refer to “Note 25 Offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities” in the “Consolidated financial statements” section of the Annual Report 2019 for more information. |
USD million | 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Debt securities | 14,118 | 14,141 |
of which: government bills / bonds | 8,458 | 8,492 |
Loans to financial advisors1 | 2,699 | 2,877 |
Fee- and commission-related receivables | 2,084 | 1,520 |
Finance lease receivables | 1,386 | 1,444 |
Settlement and clearing accounts | 893 | 587 |
Accrued interest income | 625 | 742 |
Other | 2,102 | 1,701 |
Total other financial assets measured at amortized cost | 23,907 | 23,012 |
1 Related to financial advisors in the US and Canada. |
USD million | 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Precious metals and other physical commodities | 4,050 | 4,597 |
Bail deposit1 | 1,273 | 1,293 |
Prepaid expenses | 787 | 687 |
VAT and other tax receivables | 336 | 436 |
Properties and other non-current assets held for sale | 202 | 199 |
Other | 651 | 335 |
Total other non-financial assets | 7,299 | 7,547 |
1 Refer to item 1 in Note 15b for more information. |
46
Note 12 Other assets and liabilities (continued)
USD million | 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Other accrued expenses | 1,639 | 1,697 |
Accrued interest expenses | 1,083 | 1,596 |
Settlement and clearing accounts | 1,827 | 1,368 |
Lease liabilities | 3,744 | 3,858 |
Other | 2,168 | 1,854 |
Total other financial liabilities measured at amortized cost | 10,462 | 10,373 |
|
USD million | 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Financial liabilities related to unit-linked investment contracts | 23,150 | 28,145 |
Securities financing transactions | 5,992 | 5,742 |
Over-the-counter debt instruments | 2,297 | 2,022 |
Funding from UBS Group AG and its subsidiaries | 259 | 217 |
Other | 96 | 31 |
Total other financial liabilities designated at fair value | 31,794 | 36,157 |
of which: life-to-date own credit (gain) / loss | (328) | 6 |
|
USD million | 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Compensation-related liabilities | 2,656 | 4,296 |
of which: financial advisor compensation plans | 1,188 | 1,459 |
of which: other compensation plans | 371 | 1,750 |
of which: net defined benefit pension and post-employment liabilities | 624 | 629 |
of which: other compensation-related liabilities 1 | 473 | 458 |
Deferred tax liabilities | 800 | 311 |
Current tax liabilities | 649 | 780 |
VAT and other tax payables | 502 | 445 |
Deferred income | 213 | 134 |
Other | 245 | 202 |
Total other non-financial liabilities | 5,065 | 6,168 |
1 Includes liabilities for payroll taxes and untaken vacation. |
47
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
USD million | 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Issued debt instruments |
|
|
Equity-linked1 | 32,927 | 41,722 |
Rates-linked | 12,898 | 16,318 |
Credit-linked | 1,682 | 1,916 |
Fixed-rate | 3,797 | 4,636 |
Commodity-linked | 1,249 | 1,567 |
Other | 488 | 432 |
Total debt issued designated at fair value | 53,040 | 66,592 |
of which: life-to-date own credit (gain) / loss | (741) | 82 |
1 Includes investment fund unit-linked instruments issued. |
USD million | 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Certificates of deposit | 9,246 | 5,190 |
Commercial paper | 15,453 | 14,413 |
Other short-term debt | 2,468 | 2,235 |
Short-term debt1 | 27,167 | 21,837 |
Senior unsecured debt | 20,590 | 22,356 |
Covered bonds | 2,570 | 2,633 |
Subordinated debt | 7,551 | 7,431 |
of which: low-trigger loss-absorbing tier 2 capital instruments | 7,017 | 6,892 |
of which: non-Basel III-compliant tier 2 capital instruments | 534 | 540 |
Debt issued through the Swiss central mortgage institutions | 8,597 | 8,574 |
Other long-term debt | 3 | 4 |
Long-term debt2 | 39,312 | 40,998 |
Total debt issued measured at amortized cost3 | 66,479 | 62,835 |
1 Debt with an original contractual maturity of less than one year. 2 Debt with an original maturity greater than or equal to one year. The classification of debt issued into short-term and long-term does not consider any early redemption features. 3 Net of bifurcated embedded derivatives, the fair value of which was not material for the periods presented. |
48
The table below presents an overview of total provisions.
USD million |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 |
Provisions other than provisions for expected credit losses |
| 2,368 | 2,825 |
Provisions for expected credit losses |
| 162 | 114 |
Total provisions |
| 2,530 | 2,938 |
The following table presents additional information for provisions other than provisions for expected credit losses.
USD million | Operational risks1 | Litigation, regulatory and similar matters2 | Restructuring | Real estate | Employee benefits5 | Other | Total |
Balance as of 31 December 2019 | 41 | 2,475 | 99 | 92 | 54 | 64 | 2,825 |
Increase in provisions recognized in the income statement | 8 | 13 | 74 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 99 |
Release of provisions recognized in the income statement | 0 | (6) | (4) | (3) | (2) | 0 | (16) |
Provisions used in conformity with designated purpose | (9) | (472) | (36) | 0 | 0 | (5) | (522) |
Capitalized reinstatement costs | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1) | 0 | 0 | (1) |
Foreign currency translation / unwind of discount | 0 | (12) | (2) | (1) | (2) | 0 | (16) |
Balance as of 31 March 2020 | 41 | 1,998 | 1323 | 874 | 52 | 59 | 2,368 |
1 Comprises provisions for losses resulting from security risks and transaction processing risks. 2 Comprises provisions for losses resulting from legal, liability and compliance risks. 3 Primarily consists of personnel-related restructuring provisions of USD 68 million as of 31 March 2020 (31 December 2019: USD 33 million) and provisions for onerous contracts of USD 59 million as of 31 March 2020 (31 December 2019: USD 61 million). 4 Consists of reinstatement costs for leasehold improvements of USD 80 million as of 31 March 2020 (31 December 2019: USD 82 million) and provisions for onerous contracts of USD 7 million as of 31 March 2020 (31 December 2019: USD 10 million). 5 Includes provisions for sabbatical and anniversary awards. |
Restructuring provisions primarily relate to severance payments and onerous contracts. Severance-related provisions are used within a short time period, usually within six months, but potential changes in amount may be triggered when natural staff attrition reduces the number of people affected by a restructuring event and therefore the estimated costs. Onerous contracts for property are recognized when UBS AG is committed to pay for non-lease components, such as utilities, service charges, taxes and maintenance, when a property is vacated or not fully recovered from sub-tenants.
Information about provisions and contingent liabilities in respect of litigation, regulatory and similar matters, as a class, is included in Note 15b. There are no material contingent liabilities associated with the other classes of provisions.
49
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 15 Provisions and contingent liabilities (continued)
UBS operates in a legal and regulatory environment that exposes it to significant litigation and similar risks arising from disputes and regulatory proceedings. As a result, UBS (which for purposes of this Note may refer to UBS AG and/or one or more of its subsidiaries, as applicable) is involved in various disputes and legal proceedings, including litigation, arbitration, and regulatory and criminal investigations.
Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome and the timing of resolution are often difficult to predict, particularly in the earlier stages of a case. There are also situations where UBS may enter into a settlement agreement. This may occur in order to avoid the expense, management distraction or reputational implications of continuing to contest liability, even for those matters for which UBS believes it should be exonerated. The uncertainties inherent in all such matters affect the amount and timing of any potential outflows for both matters with respect to which provisions have been established and other contingent liabilities. UBS makes provisions for such matters brought against it when, in the opinion of management after seeking legal advice, it is more likely than not that UBS has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required, and the amount can be reliably estimated. Where these factors are otherwise satisfied, a provision may be established for claims that have not yet been asserted against UBS, but are nevertheless expected to be, based on UBS’s experience with similar asserted claims. If any of those conditions is not met, such matters result in contingent liabilities. If the amount of an obligation cannot be reliably estimated, a liability exists that is not recognized even if an outflow of resources is probable. Accordingly, no provision is established even if the potential outflow of resources with respect to such matters could be significant. Developments relating to a matter that occur after the relevant reporting period, but prior to the issuance of financial statements, which affect management’s assessment of the provision for such matter (because, for example, the developments provide evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period), are adjusting events after the reporting period under IAS 10 and must be recognized in the financial statements for the reporting period.
Specific litigation, regulatory and other matters are described below, including all such matters that management considers to be material and others that management believes to be of significance due to potential financial, reputational and other effects. The amount of damages claimed, the size of a transaction or other information is provided where available and appropriate in order to assist users in considering the magnitude of potential exposures.
In the case of certain matters below, we state that we have established a provision, and for the other matters, we make no such statement. When we make this statement and we expect disclosure of the amount of a provision to prejudice seriously our position with other parties in the matter because it would reveal what UBS believes to be the probable and reliably estimable outflow, we do not disclose that amount. In some cases we are subject to confidentiality obligations that preclude such disclosure. With respect to the matters for which we do not state whether we have established a provision, either: (a) we have not established a provision, in which case the matter is treated as a contingent liability under the applicable accounting standard; or (b) we have established a provision but expect disclosure of that fact to prejudice seriously our position with other parties in the matter because it would reveal the fact that UBS believes an outflow of resources to be probable and reliably estimable.
With respect to certain litigation, regulatory and similar matters for which we have established provisions, we are able to estimate the expected timing of outflows. However, the aggregate amount of the expected outflows for those matters for which we are able to estimate expected timing is immaterial relative to our current and expected levels of liquidity over the relevant time periods.
50
Note 15 Provisions and contingent liabilities (continued)
The aggregate amount provisioned for litigation, regulatory and similar matters as a class is disclosed in the “Provisions” table in Note 15a above. It is not practicable to provide an aggregate estimate of liability for our litigation, regulatory and similar matters as a class of contingent liabilities. Doing so would require us to provide speculative legal assessments as to claims and proceedings that involve unique fact patterns or novel legal theories, that have not yet been initiated or are at early stages of adjudication, or as to which alleged damages have not been quantified by the claimants. Although we therefore cannot provide a numerical estimate of the future losses that could arise from litigation, regulatory and similar matters, we believe that the aggregate amount of possible future losses from this class that are more than remote substantially exceeds the level of current provisions.
Litigation, regulatory and similar matters may also result in non-monetary penalties and consequences. For example, the non-prosecution agreement described in item 5 of this Note, which we entered into with the US Department of Justice (DOJ), Criminal Division, Fraud Section in connection with our submissions of benchmark interest rates, including, among others, the British Bankers’ Association London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), was terminated by the DOJ based on its determination that we had committed a US crime in relation to foreign exchange matters. As a consequence, UBS AG pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud for conduct in the LIBOR matter, paid a fine and was subject to probation, which ended in January 2020.
A guilty plea to, or conviction of, a crime could have material consequences for UBS. Resolution of regulatory proceedings may require us to obtain waivers of regulatory disqualifications to maintain certain operations, may entitle regulatory authorities to limit, suspend or terminate licenses and regulatory authorizations, and may permit financial market utilities to limit, suspend or terminate our participation in such utilities. Failure to obtain such waivers, or any limitation, suspension or termination of licenses, authorizations or participations, could have material consequences for UBS.
The risk of loss associated with litigation, regulatory and similar matters is a component of operational risk for purposes of determining our capital requirements. Information concerning our capital requirements and the calculation of operational risk for this purpose is included in the “Capital management” section of the UBS Group first quarter 2020 report.
Provisions for litigation, regulatory and similar matters by business division and in Group Functions1 | ||||||
USD million | Global Wealth Manage- ment | Personal & Corporate Banking | Asset Manage- ment | Investment Bank | Group Functions | UBS |
Balance as of 31 December 2019 | 782 | 113 | 0 | 255 | 1,325 | 2,475 |
Increase in provisions recognized in the income statement | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 |
Release of provisions recognized in the income statement | (5) | 0 | 0 | (1) | (1) | (6) |
Provisions used in conformity with designated purpose | (34) | 0 | 0 | (44) | (394) | (472) |
Reclassifications | 0 | 0 | 0 | (3) | 3 | 0 |
Foreign currency translation / unwind of discount | (9) | (1) | 0 | (2) | 0 | (12) |
Balance as of 31 March 2020 | 747 | 112 | 0 | 205 | 934 | 1,998 |
1 Provisions, if any, for matters described in this disclosure are recorded in Global Wealth Management (item 3 and item 4) and Group Functions (item 2). Provisions, if any, for the matters described in items 1 and 6 of this disclosure are allocated between Global Wealth Management and Personal & Corporate Banking, and provisions, if any, for the matters described in this disclosure in item 5 are allocated between the Investment Bank and Group Functions. |
51
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 15 Provisions and contingent liabilities (continued)
1. Inquiries regarding cross-border wealth management businesses
Tax and regulatory authorities in a number of countries have made inquiries, served requests for information or examined employees located in their respective jurisdictions relating to the cross-border wealth management services provided by UBS and other financial institutions. It is possible that the implementation of automatic tax information exchange and other measures relating to cross-border provision of financial services could give rise to further inquiries in the future. UBS has received disclosure orders from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (FTA) to transfer information based on requests for international administrative assistance in tax matters. The requests concern a number of UBS account numbers pertaining to current and former clients and are based on data from 2006 and 2008. UBS has taken steps to inform affected clients about the administrative assistance proceedings and their procedural rights, including the right to appeal. The requests are based on data received from the German authorities, who seized certain data related to UBS clients booked in Switzerland during their investigations and have apparently shared this data with other European countries. UBS expects additional countries to file similar requests.
The Swiss Federal Administrative Court ruled in 2016 that, in the administrative assistance proceedings related to a French bulk request, UBS has the right to appeal all final FTA client data disclosure orders. On 30 July 2018, the Swiss Federal Administrative Court granted UBS’s appeal by holding the French administrative assistance request inadmissible. The FTA filed a final appeal with the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. On 26 July 2019, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Federal Administrative Court. In December 2019, the court released its written decision. The decision requires the FTA to obtain confirmation from the French authorities that transmitted data will be used only for the purposes stated in their request before transmitting any data. The stated purpose of the original request was to obtain information relating to taxes owed by account holders. Accordingly, any information transferred to the French authorities must not be passed to criminal authorities or used in connection with the ongoing case against UBS discussed in this item.
Since 2013, UBS (France) S.A., UBS AG and certain former employees have been under investigation in France for alleged complicity in unlawful solicitation of clients on French territory, regarding the laundering of proceeds of tax fraud, and banking and financial solicitation by unauthorized persons. In connection with this investigation, the investigating judges ordered UBS AG to provide bail (“caution”) of EUR 1.1 billion and UBS (France) S.A. to post bail of EUR 40 million, which was reduced on appeal to EUR 10 million.
A trial in the court of first instance took place from 8 October 2018 until 15 November 2018. On 20 February 2019, the court announced a verdict finding UBS AG guilty of unlawful solicitation of clients on French territory and aggravated
laundering of the proceeds of tax fraud, and UBS (France) S.A. guilty of aiding and abetting unlawful solicitation and laundering the proceeds of tax fraud. The court imposed fines aggregating EUR 3.7 billion on UBS AG and UBS (France) S.A. and awarded EUR 800 million of civil damages to the French state. UBS has appealed the decision. Under French law, the judgment is suspended while the appeal is pending. UBS has been informed that the trial in the Court of Appeal that was scheduled for June 2020 has been postponed and a scheduling conference will be held in early June. The Court of Appeal will retry the case de novo as to both the law and the facts, and the fines and penalties can be greater than or less than those imposed by the court of first instance. A subsequent appeal to the Cour de Cassation, France’s highest court, is possible with respect to questions of law.
UBS believes that based on both the law and the facts the judgment of the court of first instance should be reversed. UBS believes it followed its obligations under Swiss and French law as well as the European Savings Tax Directive. Even assuming liability, which it contests, UBS believes the penalties and damage amounts awarded greatly exceed the amounts that could be supported by the law and the facts. In particular, UBS believes the court incorrectly based the penalty on the total regularized assets rather than on any unpaid taxes on those assets for which a fraud has been characterized and further incorrectly awarded damages based on costs that were not proven by the civil party. Notwithstanding that UBS believes it should be acquitted, our balance sheet at 31 March 2020 reflected provisions with respect to this matter in an amount of EUR 450 million (USD 505 million at 31 March 2020). The wide range of possible outcomes in this case contributes to a high degree of estimation uncertainty. The provision reflected on our balance sheet at 31 March 2020 reflects our best estimate of possible financial implications, although it is reasonably possible that actual penalties and civil damages could exceed the provision amount.
In 2016, UBS was notified by the Belgian investigating judge that it is under formal investigation (“inculpé”) regarding the laundering of proceeds of tax fraud, of banking and financial solicitation by unauthorized persons, and of serious tax fraud. In 2018, tax authorities and a prosecutor’s office in Italy asserted that UBS is potentially liable for taxes and penalties as a result of its activities in Italy from 2012 to 2017. In June 2019, UBS entered into a settlement agreement with the Italian tax authorities under which it paid EUR 101 million to resolve the claims asserted by the authority related to UBS AG’s potential permanent establishment in Italy. In October 2019, the Judge of Preliminary Investigations of the Milan Court approved an agreement with the Milan prosecutor under Article 63 of Italian Administrative Law 231 under which UBS AG, UBS Switzerland AG and UBS Monaco have paid an aggregate of EUR 10.3 million to resolve claims premised on the alleged inadequacy of historical internal controls. No admission of wrongdoing was required in connection with this resolution.
52
Note 15 Provisions and contingent liabilities (continued)
Our balance sheet at 31 March 2020 reflected provisions with respect to matters described in this item 1 in an amount that UBS believes to be appropriate under the applicable accounting standard. As in the case of other matters for which we have established provisions, the future outflow of resources in respect of such matters cannot be determined with certainty based on currently available information and accordingly may ultimately prove to be substantially greater (or may be less) than the provision that we have recognized.
2. Claims related to sales of residential mortgage-backed securities and mortgages
From 2002 through 2007, prior to the crisis in the US residential loan market, UBS was a substantial issuer and underwriter of US residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and was a purchaser and seller of US residential mortgages.
Lawsuits related to contractual representations and warranties concerning mortgages and RMBS: Certain RMBS trusts filed an action in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking to enforce UBS RESI’s obligation to repurchase loans in the collateral pools for three RMBS securitizations issued and underwritten by UBS In the first quarter of 2020 the court approved the settlement UBS agreed with the trustee in July 2018 and UBS paid the USD 850 million settlement amount. A significant portion of this amount was borne by other parties that indemnified UBS. Proceedings to determine how the settlement funds will be distributed to RMBS holders are ongoing. UBS considers claims relating to substantially all loan repurchase demands to be resolved and believes that new demands to repurchase US residential mortgage loans are time-barred under a decision rendered by the New York Court of Appeals.
Mortgage-related regulatory matters: Since 2014, the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York has sought information from UBS pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), related to UBS’s RMBS business from 2005 through 2007. On 8 November 2018, the DOJ filed a civil complaint in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The complaint seeks unspecified civil monetary penalties under FIRREA related to UBS’s issuance, underwriting and sale of 40 RMBS transactions in 2006 and 2007. UBS moved to dismiss the civil complaint on 6 February 2019. On 10 December 2019, the district court denied UBS’s motion to dismiss.
Our balance sheet at 31 March 2020 reflected a provision with respect to matters described in this item 2 in an amount that UBS believes to be appropriate under the applicable accounting standard. As in the case of other matters for which we have established provisions, the future outflow of resources in respect of this matter cannot be determined with certainty based on currently available information and accordingly may ultimately prove to be substantially greater (or may be less) than the provision that we have recognized.
3. Madoff
In relation to the Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BMIS) investment fraud, UBS AG, UBS (Luxembourg) S.A. (now UBS Europe SE, Luxembourg branch) and certain other UBS subsidiaries have been subject to inquiries by a number of regulators, including the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) and the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. Those inquiries concerned two third-party funds established under Luxembourg law, substantially all assets of which were with BMIS, as well as certain funds established in offshore jurisdictions with either direct or indirect exposure to BMIS. These funds faced severe losses, and the Luxembourg funds are in liquidation. The documentation establishing both funds identifies UBS entities in various roles, including custodian, administrator, manager, distributor and promoter, and indicates that UBS employees serve as board members.
In 2009 and 2010, the liquidators of the two Luxembourg funds filed claims against UBS entities, non-UBS entities and certain individuals, including current and former UBS employees, seeking amounts totaling approximately EUR 2.1 billion, which includes amounts that the funds may be held liable to pay the trustee for the liquidation of BMIS (BMIS Trustee).
A large number of alleged beneficiaries have filed claims against UBS entities (and non-UBS entities) for purported losses relating to the Madoff fraud. The majority of these cases have been filed in Luxembourg, where decisions that the claims in eight test cases were inadmissible have been affirmed by the Luxembourg Court of Appeal, and the Luxembourg Supreme Court has dismissed a further appeal in one of the test cases.
In the US, the BMIS Trustee filed claims against UBS entities, among others, in relation to the two Luxembourg funds and one of the offshore funds. The total amount claimed against all defendants in these actions was not less than USD 2 billion. In 2014, the US Supreme Court rejected the BMIS Trustee’s motion for leave to appeal decisions dismissing all claims except those for the recovery of approximately USD 125 million of payments alleged to be fraudulent conveyances and preference payments. In 2016, the bankruptcy court dismissed these claims against the UBS entities. In February 2019, the Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal of the BMIS Trustee’s remaining claims. In August 2019, the defendants, including UBS, filed a petition to the US Supreme Court requesting that it review the Court of Appeals’ decision. The bankruptcy proceedings have been stayed pending a decision with respect to the defendants’ petition.
53
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 15 Provisions and contingent liabilities (continued)
Declines since 2013 in the market prices of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and of closed-end funds (funds) that are sole-managed and co-managed by UBS Trust Company of Puerto Rico and distributed by UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico (UBS PR) have led to multiple regulatory inquiries, as well as customer complaints and arbitrations with aggregate claimed damages of USD 3.4 billion, of which claims with aggregate claimed damages of USD 2.5 billion have been resolved through settlements, arbitration or withdrawal of the claim. The claims have been filed by clients in Puerto Rico who own the funds or Puerto Rico municipal bonds and/or who used their UBS account assets as collateral for UBS non-purpose loans; customer complaint and arbitration allegations include fraud, misrepresentation and unsuitability of the funds and of the loans.
A shareholder derivative action was filed in 2014 against various UBS entities and current and certain former directors of the funds, alleging hundreds of millions of US dollars in losses in the funds. In 2015, defendants’ motion to dismiss was denied and a request for permission to appeal that ruling was denied by the Puerto Rico Supreme Court. In 2014, a federal class action complaint also was filed against various UBS entities, certain members of UBS PR senior management and the co-manager of certain of the funds, seeking damages for investor losses in the funds during the period from May 2008 through May 2014. Following denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, the case was dismissed in October 2018.
In 2014 and 2015, UBS entered into settlements with the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in relation to their examinations of UBS’s operations.
In 2011, a purported derivative action was filed on behalf of the Employee Retirement System of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (System) against over 40 defendants, including UBS PR, which was named in connection with its underwriting and consulting services. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants violated their purported fiduciary duties and contractual obligations in connection with the issuance and underwriting of USD 3 billion of bonds by the System in 2008 and sought damages of over USD 800 million. In 2016, the court granted the System’s request to join the action as a plaintiff, but ordered that plaintiffs must file an amended complaint. In 2017, the court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
Beginning in 2015, and continuing through 2017, certain agencies and public corporations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Commonwealth) defaulted on certain interest payments on Puerto Rico bonds. In 2016, US federal legislation created an oversight board with power to oversee Puerto Rico’s finances and to restructure its debt. The oversight board has imposed a stay on the exercise of certain creditors’ rights. In 2017, the oversight board placed certain of the bonds into a bankruptcy-like proceeding under the supervision of a Federal District Judge. These events, further defaults or any further legislative action to create a legal means of restructuring Commonwealth obligations or to impose additional oversight on the Commonwealth’s finances, or any restructuring of the Commonwealth’s obligations, may increase the number of claims against UBS concerning Puerto Rico securities, as well as potential damages sought.
In May 2019, the oversight board filed complaints in Puerto Rico federal district court bringing claims against financial, legal and accounting firms that had participated in Puerto Rico municipal bond offerings, including UBS, seeking a return of underwriting and swap fees paid in connection with those offerings. UBS estimates that it received approximately USD 125 million in fees in the relevant offerings.
In August 2019 and February 2020, three US insurance companies that insured issues of Puerto Rico municipal bonds sued UBS and seven other underwriters of Puerto Rico municipal bonds. The actions collectively seek recovery of an aggregate of USD 955 million in damages from the defendants. The plaintiffs in these cases claim that defendants failed to reasonably investigate financial statements in the offering materials for the insured Puerto Rico bonds issued between 2002 and 2007, which plaintiffs argue they relied upon in agreeing to insure the bonds notwithstanding that they had no contractual relationship with the underwriters.
Our balance sheet at 31 March 2020 reflected provisions with respect to matters described in this item 4 in amounts that UBS believes to be appropriate under the applicable accounting standard. As in the case of other matters for which we have established provisions, the future outflow of resources in respect of such matters cannot be determined with certainty based on currently available information and accordingly may ultimately prove to be substantially greater (or may be less) than the provisions that we have recognized.
54
Note 15 Provisions and contingent liabilities (continued)
5. Foreign exchange, LIBOR and benchmark rates, and other trading practices
Foreign exchange-related regulatory matters: Beginning in 2013, numerous authorities commenced investigations concerning possible manipulation of foreign exchange markets and precious metals prices. As a result of these investigations, UBS entered into resolutions with the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), FINMA, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board) and the Connecticut Department of Banking, the DOJ’s Criminal Division and the European Commission. UBS has ongoing obligations under the Cease and Desist Order of the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (as successor to the Connecticut Department of Banking), and to cooperate with relevant authorities and to undertake certain remediation measures. UBS has also been granted conditional immunity by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ and by authorities in other jurisdictions in connection with potential competition law violations relating to foreign exchange and precious metals businesses. Investigations relating to foreign exchange matters by certain authorities remain ongoing notwithstanding these resolutions.
Foreign exchange-related civil litigation: Putative class actions have been filed since 2013 in US federal courts and in other jurisdictions against UBS and other banks on behalf of putative classes of persons who engaged in foreign currency transactions with any of the defendant banks. UBS has resolved US federal court class actions relating to foreign currency transactions with the defendant banks and persons who transacted in foreign exchange futures contracts and options on such futures under a settlement agreement that provides for UBS to pay an aggregate of USD 141 million and provide cooperation to the settlement classes. Certain class members have excluded themselves from that settlement and have filed individual actions in US and English courts against UBS and other banks, alleging violations of US and European competition laws and unjust enrichment.
In 2015, a putative class action was filed in federal court against UBS and numerous other banks on behalf of persons and businesses in the US who directly purchased foreign currency from the defendants and alleged co-conspirators for their own end use. In March 2017, the court granted UBS’s (and the other banks’) motions to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in August 2017. In March 2018, the court denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint.
In 2017, two putative class actions were filed in federal court in New York against UBS and numerous other banks on behalf of persons and entities who had indirectly purchased foreign exchange instruments from a defendant or co-conspirator in the US, and a consolidated complaint was filed in June 2017. In March 2018, the court dismissed the consolidated complaint. In October 2018, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint. In January 2020, UBS and 11 other banks agreed in principle with the plaintiffs to settle the class action for a total of USD 10 million. The settlement is subject to final documentation and court approval.
LIBOR and other benchmark-related regulatory matters: Numerous government agencies, including the SEC, the CFTC, the DOJ, the FCA, the UK Serious Fraud Office, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, FINMA, various state attorneys general in the US and competition authorities in various jurisdictions, have conducted investigations regarding potential improper attempts by UBS, among others, to manipulate LIBOR and other benchmark rates at certain times. UBS reached settlements or otherwise concluded investigations relating to benchmark interest rates with the investigating authorities. UBS has ongoing obligations to cooperate with the authorities with whom we have reached resolutions and to undertake certain remediation measures with respect to benchmark interest rate submissions. UBS has been granted conditional leniency or conditional immunity from authorities in certain jurisdictions, including the Antitrust Division of the DOJ and the Swiss Competition Commission (WEKO), in connection with potential antitrust or competition law violations related to certain rates. However, UBS has not reached a final settlement with WEKO, as the Secretariat of WEKO has asserted that UBS does not qualify for full immunity.
LIBOR and other benchmark-related civil litigation: A number of putative class actions and other actions are pending in the federal courts in New York against UBS and numerous other banks on behalf of parties who transacted in certain interest rate benchmark-based derivatives. Also pending in the US and in other jurisdictions are a number of other actions asserting losses related to various products whose interest rates were linked to LIBOR and other benchmarks, including adjustable rate mortgages, preferred and debt securities, bonds pledged as collateral, loans, depository accounts, investments and other interest-bearing instruments. The complaints allege manipulation, through various means, of certain benchmark interest rates, including USD LIBOR, Euroyen TIBOR, Yen LIBOR, EURIBOR, CHF LIBOR, GBP LIBOR, SGD SIBOR and SOR and Australian BBSW, and seek unspecified compensatory and other damages under varying legal theories.
55
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
Note 15 Provisions and contingent liabilities (continued)
USD LIBOR class and individual actions in the US: In 2013 and 2015, the district court in the USD LIBOR actions dismissed, in whole or in part, certain plaintiffs’ antitrust claims, federal racketeering claims, CEA claims, and state common law claims. Although the Second Circuit vacated the district court’s judgment dismissing antitrust claims, the district court again dismissed antitrust claims against UBS in 2016. Certain plaintiffs have appealed that decision to the Second Circuit. Separately, in 2018, the Second Circuit reversed in part the district court’s 2015 decision dismissing certain individual plaintiffs’ claims and certain of these actions are now proceeding. UBS entered into an agreement in 2016 with representatives of a class of bondholders to settle their USD LIBOR class action. The agreement has received preliminary court approval and remains subject to final approval. In 2018, the district court denied plaintiffs’ motions for class certification in the USD class actions for claims pending against UBS, and plaintiffs sought permission to appeal that ruling to the Second Circuit. In July 2018, the Second Circuit denied the petition to appeal of the class of USD lenders and in November 2018 denied the petition of the USD exchange class. In December 2019, UBS entered into an agreement with representatives of the class of USD lenders to settle their USD LIBOR class action. The agreement has received preliminary court approval and remains subject to final approval. In January 2019, a putative class action was filed in the District Court for the Southern District of New York against UBS and numerous other banks on behalf of US residents who, since 1 February 2014, directly transacted with a defendant bank in USD LIBOR instruments. The complaint asserts antitrust claims. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint in August 2019. On 26 March 2020 the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety.
Other benchmark class actions in the US: In 2014, the court in one of the Euroyen TIBOR lawsuits dismissed certain of the plaintiffs’ claims, including a federal antitrust claim, for lack of standing. In 2015, this court dismissed the plaintiffs’ federal racketeering claims on the same basis and affirmed its previous dismissal of the plaintiffs’ antitrust claims against UBS. In 2017, this court also dismissed the other Yen LIBOR / Euroyen TIBOR action in its entirety on standing grounds, as did the court in the CHF LIBOR action. Also in 2017, the court in the EURIBOR lawsuit dismissed the case as to UBS and certain other foreign defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiffs in the other Yen LIBOR, Euroyen TIBOR and the EURIBOR actions have appealed the dismissals. In April 2020, the appeals court reversed the dismissal of the Yen LIBOR / Euroyen TIBOR complaint. The other cases remain on appeal. In October 2018, the court in the SIBOR / SOR action dismissed all but one of plaintiffs’ claims against UBS. Plaintiffs in the CHF LIBOR and
SIBOR / SOR actions filed amended complaints following the dismissals, and the courts granted renewed motions to dismiss in July 2019 (SIBOR / SOR) and in September 2019 (CHF LIBOR). Plaintiffs in both actions have appealed. In November 2018, the court in the BBSW lawsuit dismissed the case as to UBS and certain other foreign defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. Following that dismissal, plaintiffs in the BBSW action filed an amended complaint in April 2019, which UBS and other defendants named in the amended complaint have moved to dismiss. In February 2020, the court in the BBSW action granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint. The court dismissed the GBP LIBOR action in August 2019, and plaintiffs appealed the dismissal in September 2019.
Government bonds: Putative class actions have been filed since 2015 in US federal courts against UBS and other banks on behalf of persons who participated in markets for US Treasury securities since 2007. A consolidated complaint was filed in 2017 in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that the banks colluded with respect to, and manipulated prices of, US Treasury securities sold at auction and in the secondary market and asserting claims under the antitrust laws and for unjust enrichment. Defendants’ motions to dismiss the consolidated complaint are pending. Similar class actions have been filed concerning European government bonds and other government bonds.
UBS and reportedly other banks are responding to investigations and requests for information from various authorities regarding government bond trading practices. As a result of its review to date, UBS has taken appropriate action.
Government sponsored entities (GSE) bonds: Starting in February 2019, class action complaints were filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York against UBS and other banks on behalf of plaintiffs who traded GSE bonds. A consolidated complaint was filed alleging collusion in GSE bond trading between 1 January 2009 and 1 January 2016. In December 2019, UBS and eleven other defendants agreed to settle the class action for a total of USD 250 million. The settlement is subject to court approval.
With respect to additional matters and jurisdictions not encompassed by the settlements and orders referred to above, our balance sheet at 31 March 2020 reflected a provision in an amount that UBS believes to be appropriate under the applicable accounting standard. As in the case of other matters for which we have established provisions, the future outflow of resources in respect of such matters cannot be determined with certainty based on currently available information and accordingly may ultimately prove to be substantially greater (or may be less) than the provision that we have recognized.
56
Note 15 Provisions and contingent liabilities (continued)
The Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland ruled in 2012, in a test case against UBS, that distribution fees paid to a firm for distributing third-party and intra-group investment funds and structured products must be disclosed and surrendered to clients who have entered into a discretionary mandate agreement with the firm, absent a valid waiver.
FINMA has issued a supervisory note to all Swiss banks in response to the Supreme Court decision. UBS has met the FINMA requirements and has notified all potentially affected clients.
The Supreme Court decision has resulted, and may continue to result, in a number of client requests for UBS to disclose and potentially surrender retrocessions. Client requests are assessed on a case-by-case basis. Considerations taken into account when assessing these cases include, among other things, the existence of a discretionary mandate and whether or not the client documentation contained a valid waiver with respect to distribution fees.
Our balance sheet at 31 March 2020 reflected a provision with respect to matters described in this item 6 in an amount that UBS believes to be appropriate under the applicable accounting standard. The ultimate exposure will depend on client requests and the resolution thereof, factors that are difficult to predict and assess. Hence, as in the case of other matters for which we have established provisions, the future outflow of resources in respect of such matters cannot be determined with certainty based on currently available information and accordingly may ultimately prove to be substantially greater (or may be less) than the provision that we have recognized.
57
Notes to the UBS AG interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
The table below presents the maximum irrevocable amount of guarantees, commitments and forward starting transactions.
|
| Gross |
| Total gross |
| Sub-participations |
| Net | |
As of 31.3.20, USD million |
| Measured at fair value | Not measured at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total guarantees |
| 969 | 17,830 |
| 18,800 |
| (2,634) |
| 16,166 |
Loan commitments |
| 13,514 | 28,334 |
| 41,848 |
| (817) |
| 41,031 |
Forward starting transactions1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse repurchase agreements |
| 41,161 | 5,113 |
| 46,275 |
|
|
|
|
Securities borrowing agreements |
|
| 9 |
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements |
| 31,293 | 1,221 |
| 32,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of 31.12.19, USD million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total guarantees |
| 986 | 18,142 |
| 19,128 |
| (2,646) |
| 16,482 |
Loan commitments |
| 6,308 | 27,547 |
| 33,856 |
| (787) |
| 33,069 |
Forward starting transactions1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse repurchase agreements |
| 20,284 | 1,657 |
| 21,941 |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements |
| 7,740 | 408 |
| 8,148 |
|
|
|
|
1 Cash to be paid in the future by either UBS AG or the counterparty. |
The following table shows the rates of the main currencies used to translate the financial information of UBS AG’s operations with a functional currency other than the US dollar into US dollars.
|
| Closing exchange rate |
| Average rate1 | ||||
|
| As of |
| For the quarter ended | ||||
|
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
| 31.3.20 | 31.12.19 | 31.3.19 |
1 CHF |
| 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| 1.04 | 1.02 | 1.00 |
1 EUR |
| 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.12 |
| 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.14 |
1 GBP |
| 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.30 |
| 1.28 | 1.31 | 1.31 |
100 JPY |
| 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.90 |
| 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.91 |
1 Monthly income statement items of operations with a functional currency other than the US dollar are translated with month-end rates into US dollars. Disclosed average rates for a quarter represent an average of three month-end rates, weighted according to the income and expense volumes of all operations of UBS AG with the same functional currency for each month. Weighted average rates for individual business divisions may deviate from the weighted average rates for UBS AG. |
COVID-19 related developments after the balance sheet date
UBS AG has monitored and assessed information received after the end of the reporting period, until the first quarter 2020 report was approved for issuance on 1 May 2020. No new information has arisen that required UBS AG to adjust its financial position as of 31 March 2020. However, there is significant uncertainty regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to unfold, the duration of the pandemic and the extent of the economic recovery.
While acknowledging that various government support measures may mitigate losses to some degree, UBS AG does expect elevated credit loss expenses to persist for at least as long as the COVID-19 containment measures continue. In particular, given that the current situation is very fluid, updates to scenarios, forecast economic conditions and management overlays may be required during 2020 as further information about the effects of the pandemic is received, including a potential deterioration in estimates of GDP and unemployment.
58
Alternative performance measures
Alternative performance measures An alternative performance measure (an APM) is a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable recognized accounting standards or in other applicable regulations. We report a number of APMs in our external reports (annual, quarterly and other reports). We use APMs to provide a fuller picture of our operating performance and to reflect management’s view of the fundamental drivers of our business results. A definition of each APM, the method used to calculate it and the information content are presented in the table1 below. Our APMs may qualify as non-GAAP measures as defined by US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations. |
APM label | Definition | Information content
|
Invested assets | Calculated as the sum of managed fund assets, managed institutional assets, discretionary and advisory wealth management portfolios, fiduciary deposits, time deposits, savings accounts, and wealth management securities or brokerage accounts. | This measure provides information about the volume of client assets managed by or deposited with UBS for investment purposes. |
Recurring income – GWM | Calculated as the total of net interest income and recurring net fee income. | This measure provides information about the amount of the recurring net interest and fee income. |
Recurring net fee income – GWM, P&C | Calculated as the total of fees for services provided on an ongoing basis, such as portfolio management fees, asset-based investment fund fees, custody fees and account-keeping fees, which are generated on client assets. | This measure provides information about the amount of recurring net fee income. |
Transaction-based income – GWM, P&C | Calculated as the total of the non-recurring portion of net fee and commission income, mainly composed of brokerage and transaction-based investment fund fees, as well as credit card fees and fees for payment transactions, together with other net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss. | This measure provides information about the amount of the non-recurring portion of net fee and commission income. |
Cost / income ratio (%) | Calculated as operating expenses divided by operating income before credit loss expense or recovery. | This measure provides information about the efficiency of the business by comparing operating expenses with gross income. |
Gross margin on invested assets (bps) – GWM, AM | Calculated as operating income before credit loss expense or recovery (annualized as applicable) divided by average invested assets. | This measure provides information about the operating income before credit loss expense or recovery of the business in relation to invested assets. |
Net interest margin (bps) – P&C | Calculated as net interest income (annualized as applicable) divided by average loans. | This measure provides information about the profitability of the business by calculating the difference between the price charged for lending and the cost of funding, relative to loan value. |
Net margin on invested assets (bps) – GWM, AM | Calculated as operating profit before tax (annualized as applicable) divided by average invested assets. | This measure provides information about the operating profit before tax of the business in relation to invested assets. |
Net new business volume growth (%) – P&C | Calculated as total net inflows and outflows of client assets and loans during the period (annualized as applicable) divided by total business volume / client assets at the beginning of the period. | This measure provides information about the growth of the business volume as a result of net new business volume flows during a specific period. |
59
Appendix
APM label | Calculation | Information content
|
Net profit growth (%) | Calculated as the change in net profit attributable to shareholders from continuing operations between current and comparison periods divided by net profit attributable to shareholders from continuing operations of the comparison period. | This measure provides information about profit growth in comparison with the prior period. |
Recurring income as a % of income – GWM | Calculated as net interest income and recurring net fee income divided by operating income before credit loss expense or recovery. | This measure provides information about the proportion of recurring income in operating income. |
Return on common equity tier 1 capital (%) | Calculated as annualized net profit attributable to shareholders divided by average common equity tier 1 capital. | This measure provides information about the profitability of the business in relation to common equity tier 1 capital. |
Return on equity (%) | Calculated as annualized net profit attributable to shareholders divided by average equity attributable to shareholders. | This measure provides information about the profitability of the business in relation to equity. |
Return on leverage ratio denominator, gross (%) | Calculated as annualized operating income before credit loss expense or recovery divided by average leverage ratio denominator. | This measure provides information about the revenues of the business in relation to leverage ratio denominator. |
Return on risk-weighted | Calculated as annualized operating income before credit loss expense or recovery divided by average risk-weighted assets. | This measure provides information about the revenues of the business in relation to risk-weighted assets. |
Return on tangible equity (%) | Calculated as annualized net profit attributable to shareholders divided by average equity attributable to shareholders less average goodwill and intangible assets. | This measure provides information about the profitability of the business in relation to tangible equity. |
Total book value per share (USD and CHF2) | Calculated as equity attributable to shareholders divided by the number of shares outstanding. | This measure provides information about net assets on a per-share basis. |
Total tangible book value per share (USD and CHF2) | Calculated as equity attributable to shareholders less goodwill and intangible assets divided by the number of shares outstanding. | This measure provides information about tangible net assets on a per-share basis. |
Loan penetration (%) | Calculated as loans divided by invested assets. | This measure provides information about the loan volume in relation to invested assets. |
Mandate penetration (%) | Calculated as mandate volume divided by invested assets. | This measure provides information about mandate volume in relation to invested assets. |
1 The table contains APMs that are used across our external reports (annual, quarterly and other reports). Not all of the listed APMs may appear in this particular report. 2 Total book value per share and total tangible book value per share in Swiss francs are calculated based on a translation of equity under our US dollar presentation currency.
60
A
ABS asset-backed securities
AEI automatic exchange of information
AGM Annual General Meeting of shareholders
A-IRB advanced internal
ratings-based
AIV alternative investment vehicle
ALCO Asset and Liability Committee
AMA advanced measurement approach
AML anti-money laundering
AoA Articles of Association
APAC Asia Pacific
APM alternative performance measure
ARR alternative reference rate
ARS auction rate securities
ASF available stable funding
AT1 additional tier 1
AuM assets under management
B
BCBS Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision
BEAT base erosion and anti-abuse tax
BIS Bank for International Settlements
BoD Board of Directors
BVG Swiss occupational
pension plan
C
CAO Capital Adequacy Ordinance
CCAR Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
CCF credit conversion factor
CCP central counterparty
CCR counterparty credit risk
CCRC Corporate Culture and Responsibility Committee
CCyB countercyclical buffer
CDO collateralized debt
obligation
CDS credit default swap
CEA Commodity Exchange Act
CEM current exposure method
CEO Chief Executive Officer
CET1 common equity tier 1
CFO Chief Financial Officer
CFTC US Commodity Futures Trading Commission
CHF Swiss franc
CIC Corporate & Institutional Clients
CIO Chief Investment Office
CLS Continuous Linked Settlement
CMBS commercial mortgage-backed security
C&ORC Compliance & Operational Risk Control
CRD IV EU Capital Requirements Directive of 2013
CRM credit risk mitigation (credit risk) or comprehensive risk measure (market risk)
CRR Capital Requirements Regulation
CST combined stress test
CVA credit valuation adjustment
D
DBO defined benefit obligation
DCCP Deferred Contingent Capital Plan
DJSI Dow Jones Sustainability Indices
DM discount margin
DOJ US Department of Justice
D-SIB domestic systemically important bank
DTA deferred tax asset
DVA debit valuation adjustment
E
EAD exposure at default
EB Executive Board
EBA European Banking Authority
EC European Commission
ECB European Central Bank
ECL expected credit loss
EIR effective interest rate
EL expected loss
EMEA Europe, Middle East and Africa
EOP Equity Ownership Plan
EPE expected positive exposure
EPS earnings per share
ESG environmental, social and governance
ETD exchange-traded derivatives
ETF exchange-traded fund
EU European Union
EUR euro
EURIBOR Euro Interbank Offered Rate
EVE economic value of equity
EY Ernst & Young (Ltd)
F
FA financial advisor
FCA UK Financial Conduct
Authority
FCT foreign currency translation
FINMA Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority
FMIA Swiss Financial Market Infrastructure Act
FSB Financial Stability Board
FTA Swiss Federal Tax Administration
FVA funding valuation adjustment
FVOCI fair value through other comprehensive income
FVTPL fair value through profit or loss
FX foreign exchange
G
GAAP generally accepted
accounting principles
GBP pound sterling
GDP gross domestic product
GEB Group Executive Board
GIA Group Internal Audit
GIIPS Greece, Italy, Ireland,
Portugal and Spain
GMD Group Managing Director
GRI Global Reporting Initiative
GSE government sponsored entities
G-SIB global systemically important bank
H
HQLA high-quality liquid assets
HR human resources
61
Appendix
Abbreviations frequently used in our financial reports (continued)
I
IAA internal assessment approach
IAS International Accounting Standards
IASB International Accounting Standards Board
IBOR interbank offered rate
IFRIC International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards
IHC intermediate holding company
IMA internal models approach
IMM internal model method
IRB internal ratings-based
IRC incremental risk charge
IRRBB interest rate risk in the banking book
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association
K
KRT Key Risk Taker
L
LAS liquidity-adjusted stress
LCR liquidity coverage ratio
LGD loss given default
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate
LLC limited liability company
LRD leverage ratio denominator
LTIP Long-Term Incentive Plan
LTV loan-to-value
M
M&A mergers and acquisitions
MiFID II Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II
MRT Material Risk Taker
N
NAV net asset value
NCL Non-core and Legacy Portfolio
NII net interest income
NRV negative replacement value
NSFR net stable funding ratio
NYSE New York Stock Exchange
O
OCA own credit adjustment
OCI other comprehensive income
OTC over-the-counter
P
PD probability of default
PFE potential future exposure
PIT point in time
P&L profit or loss
POCI purchased or originated credit-impaired
PRA UK Prudential Regulation Authority
PRV positive replacement value
Q
QRRE qualifying revolving retail exposures
R
RBA role-based allowances
RBC risk-based capital
RbM risk-based monitoring
RMBS residential mortgage-backed securities
RniV risks not in VaR
RoAE return on attributed equity
RoCET1 return on CET1 capital
RoTE return on tangible equity
RoU right-of-use
RV replacement value
RW risk weight
RWA risk-weighted assets
S
SA standardized approach
SA-CCR standardized approach for counterparty credit risk
SAR stock appreciation right or Special Administrative Region
SBC Swiss Bank Corporation
SDG Sustainable Development Goal
SE structured entity
SEC US Securities and Exchange Commission
SEEOP Senior Executive Equity Ownership Plan
SFT securities financing transaction
SI sustainable investing
SICR significant increase in credit risk
SIX SIX Swiss Exchange
SME small and medium-sized corporate
SMF Senior Management Function
SNB Swiss National Bank
SPPI solely payments of principal and interest
SRB systemically relevant bank
SRM specific risk measure
SVaR stressed value-at-risk
T
TBTF too big to fail
TCJA US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
TLAC total loss-absorbing capacity
TTC through-the-cycle
U
UBS RESI UBS Real Estate Securities Inc.
UoM units of measure
USD US dollar
V
VaR value-at-risk
VAT value added tax
W
WEKO Swiss Competition Commission
This is a general list of the abbreviations frequently used in our financial reporting. Not all of the listed abbreviations may appear in this particular report.
62
Reporting publications
Annual publications
Annual Report (SAP No. 80531): Published in English, this single-volume report provides descriptions of: our Group strategy and performance; the strategy and performance of the business divisions and Group Functions; risk, treasury and capital management; corporate governance, corporate responsibility and our compensation framework, including information about compensation for the Board of Directors and the Group Executive Board members; and financial information, including the financial statements.
Geschäftsbericht (SAP No. 80531): This publication provides the translation into German of our Annual Report.
Annual Review (SAP No. 80530): This booklet contains key information about our strategy and performance, with a focus on corporate responsibility at UBS. It is published in English, German, French and Italian.
Compensation Report (SAP No. 82307): This report discusses our compensation framework and provides information about compensation for the Board of Directors and the Group Executive Board members. It is available in English and German.
Quarterly publications
The quarterly financial report provides an update on our strategy and performance for the respective quarter. It is available in English.
How to order publications
The annual and quarterly publications are available in .pdf format at www.ubs.com/investors, under “UBS Group AG and UBS AG financial information”, and printed copies can be requested from UBS free of charge. For annual publications, refer to the “Investor services” section at www.ubs.com/investors. Alternatively, they can be ordered by quoting the SAP number and the language preference, where applicable, from UBS AG, F4UK–AUL, P.O. Box, CH-8098 Zurich, Switzerland.
Other information
Website
The “Investor Relations” website at www.ubs.com/investors provides the following information about UBS: news releases; financial information, including results-related filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission; information for shareholders, including UBS share price charts, as well as data and dividend information, and for bondholders; the UBS corporate calendar; and presentations by management for investors and financial analysts. Information about the internet is available in English, with some information also available in German.
Results presentations
Our quarterly results presentations are webcast live. Playbacks
of most presentations can be downloaded from www.ubs.com/presentations.
Messaging service
Email alerts to news about UBS can be subscribed for under “UBS news alert” at www.ubs.com/global/en/investor-relations/contact/
investor-services.html. Messages are sent in English, German, French or Italian, with an option to select theme preferences for such alerts.
Form 20-F and other submissions to the US Securities and Exchange Commission
We file periodic reports and submit other information about UBS to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Principal among these filings is the annual report on Form 20-F, filed pursuant to the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The filing of Form 20-F is structured as a wrap-around document. Most sections of the filing can be satisfied by referring to the combined UBS Group AG and UBS AG annual report. However, there is a small amount of additional information in Form 20-F that is not presented elsewhere and is particularly targeted at readers in the US. Readers are encouraged to refer to this additional disclosure. Any document that we file with the SEC is available on the SEC’s website: www.sec.gov. Refer to www.ubs.com/investors for more information.
63
Appendix
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements | This report contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements,” including but not limited to management’s outlook for UBS’s financial performance and statements relating to the anticipated effect of transactions and strategic initiatives on UBS’s business and future development. While these forward-looking statements represent UBS’s judgments and expectations concerning the matters described, a number of risks, uncertainties and other important factors could cause actual developments and results to differ materially from UBS’s expectations. The outbreak of COVID-19 and the measures being taken globally to reduce the peak of the resulting pandemic will likely have a significant adverse effect on global economic activity, including in China, the United States and Europe, and an adverse effect on the credit profile of some of our clients and other market participants, which may result in an increase in expected credit loss expense and credit impairments. The unprecedented scale of the measures to control the COVID-19 outbreak create significantly greater uncertainty about forward-looking statements in addition to the factors that generally affect our businesses, but not limited to: (i) the degree to which UBS is successful in the ongoing execution of its strategic plans, including its cost reduction and efficiency initiatives and its ability to manage its levels of risk-weighted assets (RWA) and leverage ratio denominator (LRD), liquidity coverage ratio and other financial resources, including changes in RWA assets and liabilities arising from higher market volatility and other changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic; (ii) the degree to which UBS is successful in implementing changes to its businesses to meet changing market, regulatory and other conditions; (iii) the continuing low or negative interest rate environment in Switzerland and other jurisdictions; (iv) developments (including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic) in the macroeconomic climate and in the markets in which UBS operates or to which it is exposed, including movements in securities prices or liquidity, credit spreads, and currency exchange rates, and the effects of economic conditions, market developments, and geopolitical tensions, and changes to national trade policies on the financial position or creditworthiness of UBS’s clients and counterparties as well as on client sentiment and levels of activity; (v) changes in the availability of capital and funding, including any changes in UBS’s credit spreads and ratings, as well as availability and cost of funding to meet requirements for debt eligible for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC); (vi) changes in or the implementation of financial legislation and regulation in Switzerland, the US, the UK, the European Union and other financial centers that have imposed, or resulted in, or may do so in the future, more stringent or entity-specific capital, TLAC, leverage ratio, net stable funding ratio, liquidity and funding requirements, heightened operational resilience requirements, incremental tax requirements, additional levies, limitations on permitted activities, constraints on remuneration, constraints on transfers of capital and liquidity and sharing of operational costs across UBS or other measures, and the effect these will or would have on UBS’s business activities; (vii) the degree to which UBS is successful in implementing further changes to its legal structure to improve its resolvability and meet related regulatory requirements and the potential need to make further changes to the legal structure or booking model of UBS in response to legal and regulatory requirements, proposals in Switzerland and other jurisdictions for mandatory structural reform of banks or systemically important institutions or to other external developments, and the extent to which such changes will have the intended effects; (viii) UBS’s ability to maintain and improve its systems and controls for the detection and prevention of money laundering and compliance with sanctions to meet evolving regulatory requirements and expectations, in particular in the US; (ix) the uncertainty arising from the UK’s exit from the EU; (x) changes in UBS’s competitive position, including whether differences in regulatory capital and other requirements among the major financial centers will adversely affect UBS’s ability to compete in certain lines of business; (xi) changes in the standards of conduct applicable to our businesses that may result from new regulations or new enforcement of existing standards, including recently enacted and proposed measures to impose new and enhanced duties when interacting with customers and in the execution and handling of customer transactions; (xii) the liability to which UBS may be exposed, or possible constraints or sanctions that regulatory authorities might impose on UBS, due to litigation, contractual claims and regulatory investigations, including the potential for disqualification from certain businesses, potentially large fines or monetary penalties, or the loss of licenses or privileges as a result of regulatory or other governmental sanctions, as well as the effect that litigation, regulatory and similar matters have on the operational risk component of our RWA as well as the amount of capital available for return to shareholders; (xiii) the effects on UBS’s cross-border banking business of tax or regulatory developments and of possible changes in UBS’s policies and practices relating to this business; (xiv) UBS’s ability to retain and attract the employees necessary to generate revenues and to manage, support and control its businesses, which may be affected by competitive factors; (xv) changes in accounting or tax standards or policies, and determinations or interpretations affecting the recognition of gain or loss, the valuation of goodwill, the recognition of deferred tax assets and other matters; (xvi) UBS’s ability to implement new technologies and business methods, including digital services and technologies, and ability to successfully compete with both existing and new financial service providers, some of which may not be regulated to the same extent; (xvii) limitations on the effectiveness of UBS’s internal processes for risk management, risk control, measurement and modeling, and of financial models generally; (xviii) the occurrence of operational failures, such as fraud, misconduct, unauthorized trading, financial crime, cyberattacks and systems failures, the risk of which is increased while COVID-19 control measures require large portions of the staff of both UBS and its service providers to work remotely; (xix) restrictions on the ability of UBS AG to make payments or distributions, including due to restrictions on the ability of its subsidiaries to make loans or distributions, directly or indirectly, or, in the case of financial difficulties, due to the exercise by FINMA or the regulators of UBS’s operations in other countries of their broad statutory powers in relation to protective measures, restructuring and liquidation proceedings; (xx) the degree to which changes in regulation, capital or legal structure, financial results or other factors may affect UBS’s ability to maintain its stated capital return objective; and (xxi) the effect that these or other factors or unanticipated events may have on our reputation and the additional consequences that this may have on our business and performance. The sequence in which the factors above are presented is not indicative of their likelihood of occurrence or the potential magnitude of their consequences. Our business and financial performance could be affected by other factors identified in our past and future filings and reports, including those filed with the SEC. More detailed information about those factors is set forth in documents furnished by UBS and filings made by UBS with the SEC, including UBS’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2019. UBS is not under any obligation to (and expressly disclaims any obligation to) update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Rounding | Numbers presented throughout this report may not add up precisely to the totals provided in the tables and text. Percentages and percent changes are calculated on the basis of unrounded figures. Information about absolute changes between reporting periods, which is provided in text and which can be derived from figures displayed in the tables, is calculated on a rounded basis.
Tables | Within tables, blank fields generally indicate that the field is not applicable or not meaningful, or that information is not available as of the relevant date or for the relevant period. Zero values generally indicate that the respective figure is zero on an actual or rounded basis. Percentage changes are presented as a mathematical calculation of the change between periods.
64
UBS AG
P.O. Box, CH-8098 Zurich
P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel
ubs.com
Risk factor
Our results of operations and financial condition have been, and will likely continue to be, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the governmental measures taken to contain the pandemic have significantly adversely affected, and will likely continue to adversely affect, global economic conditions, resulting in meaningful contraction in the global economy, substantial volatility in the financial markets, increased unemployment, increased credit and counterparty risk, and operational challenges such as the temporary closures of businesses, sheltering-in-place directives and increased remote work protocols. Governments and central banks around the world have reacted to the economic crisis caused by the pandemic by implementing stimulus and liquidity programs and cutting interest rates, though it is unclear whether these or future actions will be successful in countering the economic disruption. If the pandemic is prolonged or the actions of governments and central banks are unsuccessful, the adverse impact on the global economy will deepen, and our results of operations and financial condition in future quarters will be adversely affected.
As of April 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected all of our businesses, and these effects will likely be greater in future quarters if adverse conditions persist. These effects have included declines in asset prices, significantly increased volatility, lower or negative interest rates, widening of credit spreads and credit deterioration. These effects have resulted in decreases in the valuation of loans and commitments, an increase in the allowance for credit losses, lower valuations of certain classes of trading assets, and reduced net interest income due to lower interest rates. While these effects were offset by high levels of client trading activity in the first quarter of 2020, this level of activity may not persist in future quarters.
Should these global market conditions be prolonged or worsen, or the pandemic lead to additional market disruptions, we may experience reduced client activity and demand for our products and services, increased utilization of lending commitments, more client defaults, higher credit and valuation losses in our loan portfolios, loan commitments and other assets, and impairments of other financial assets. In addition, the sharp decline in interest rates will further decrease [net] interest margins. A decline in invested assets will also reduce recurring fee income in our Global Wealth Management and Asset Management businesses. These factors and other consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively affect our financial condition, including possible constraints on capital and liquidity, as well as a higher cost of capital, and possible changes or downgrades to our credit ratings
Although we have moved a substantial portion of our workforce to work-from-home solutions, including client-facing and trading staff, if significant portions of our workforce, including key personnel, are unable to work effectively because of illness, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic, the adverse effects of the pandemic on our businesses could be exacerbated. In addition, with most of our staff working from outside our offices, we face new challenges and operational risks, including maintenance of supervisory and surveillance controls, as well as increased fraud and data security risks. While we have taken measures to manage these risks, such measures have never been tested on the scale or duration that we are currently experiencing, and there is risk that these measures will not be effective in the current unprecedented operating environment.
The extent to which the pandemic, and the related economic distress, affect our businesses, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our regulatory capital and liquidity ratios, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and any recovery period, future actions taken by governmental authorities, central banks and other third parties in response to the pandemic, and the effects on our customers, counterparties, employees and third-party service providers. Moreover, the effects of the pandemic may heighten the other risks described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report 2019 and in our First Quarter 2020 Report.
This Form 6-K is hereby incorporated by reference into (1) each of the registration statements of UBS AG on Form F-3 (Registration Number 333-225551) and on Form F-4 (Registration Number 333-234705), and of UBS Group AG on Form S-8 (Registration Numbers 333-200634; 333-200635; 333-200641; 333-200665; 333-215254; 333-215255; and 333-228653), and into each prospectus outstanding under any of the foregoing registration statements, (2) any outstanding offering circular or similar document issued or authorized by UBS AG that incorporates by reference any Form 6-K’s of UBS AG that are incorporated into its registration statements filed with the SEC, and (3) the base prospectus of Corporate Asset Backed Corporation (“CABCO”) dated June 23, 2004 (Registration Number 333-111572), the Form 8-K of CABCO filed and dated June 23, 2004 (SEC File Number 001-13444), and the Prospectus Supplements relating to the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust dated May 10, 2004 and May 17, 2004 (Registration Number 033-91744 and 033-91744-05).
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UBS AG
By: /s/ Sergio Ermotti _____
Name: Sergio Ermotti
Title: President of the Executive Board
By: /s/ Kirt Gardner _____
Name: Kirt Gardner
Title: Chief Financial Officer
By: /s/ Todd Tuckner _____
Name: Todd Tuckner
Title: Group Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
Date: May 4, 2020