KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the year ended August 31, 2012 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TO THE DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Kelso Technologies Inc., which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at August 31, 2012, August 31, 2011, and September 1, 2010, and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended August 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kelso Technologies Inc. as at August 31, 2012, August 31, 2011, and September 1, 2010, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years ended August 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Emphasis of Matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 2 in the consolidated financial statements, which describes matters and conditions that indicate the existence of material uncertainties that cast substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, British Columbia
December 12, 2012
Kelso Technologies Inc. |
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
August 31, | August 31, | September 1, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Note 18 | ) | (Note 18 | ) | ||||||
Assets | |||||||||
Current | |||||||||
Cash | $ | 2,582 | $ | 1,457,934 | $ | 266,472 | |||
Accounts receivable | 877,526 | 337,562 | 133,921 | ||||||
HST receivable | 26,577 | 92,551 | 27,128 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 82,999 | 45,755 | 16,586 | ||||||
Inventory (Note 7) | 1,196,465 | 251,171 | - | ||||||
2,186,149 | 2,184,973 | 444,107 | |||||||
Patent (Note 9) | 29,472 | 34,557 | 34,619 | ||||||
Property and equipment (Note 8) | 336,627 | 242,743 | - | ||||||
Deferred product costs | 117,932 | 81,252 | - | ||||||
Deposit | 19,166 | 15,640 | - | ||||||
$ | 2,689,346 | $ | 2,559,165 | $ | 478,726 | ||||
Liabilities | �� | ||||||||
Current | |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 747,411 | $ | 251,937 | $ | 183,179 | |||
Due to related parties (Note 11) | 16,362 | 17,000 | 104,396 | ||||||
Note payable (Note 13) | - | - | 70,320 | ||||||
763,773 | 268,937 | 357,895 | |||||||
Shareholders’ Equity | |||||||||
Capital Stock (Note 10) | |||||||||
Common shares (Note 10 (a)) | 14,495,094 | 13,639,786 | 7,992,984 | ||||||
Subscriptions received | - | 919 | - | ||||||
Share-based payments reserve | 1,405,523 | 1,347,740 | 634,933 | ||||||
(Note 10 (b)) | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | - | - | (6,478 | ) | |||||
Deficit | (13,975,044 | ) | (12,698,217 | ) | (8,500,608 | ) | |||
1,925,573 | 2,290,228 | 120,831 | |||||||
$ | 2,689,346 | $ | 2,559,165 | $ | 478,726 |
Approved on behalf of the Board:
“William Troy” (signed) | |
William Troy, Director | |
“James R. Bond” (signed”) | |
James R. Bond, Director |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
3
Kelso Technologies Inc. |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity |
For the years ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital stock | Share-based | other | |||||||||||||||||||
Number | Share | payments | comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||
of shares | Amount | subscriptions | reserve | loss | Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||||
Balance, September 1, 2010 | 21,778,383 | $ | 7,992,984 | $ | - | $ | 634,933 | $ | (6,478 | ) | $ | (8,500,608 | ) | $ | 120,831 | ||||||
Private placement for cash | 8,952,400 | 2,769,314 | - | - | - | - | 2,769,314 | ||||||||||||||
Share issue costs | - | (207,720 | ) | - | - | - | - | (207,720 | ) | ||||||||||||
Exercise of options | 18,000 | 4,369 | - | - | - | - | 4,369 | ||||||||||||||
Fair value of options exercised | - | 2,884 | - | (2,884 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Share subscriptions received | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Adjustment required for functional currency | - | 2,622,623 | - | 104,639 | 6,478 | (2,733,740 | ) | - | |||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants | 2,257,500 | 455,332 | 919 | - | - | - | 456,251 | ||||||||||||||
Share-based payments | - | - | - | 611,052 | - | - | 611,052 | ||||||||||||||
Loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | (1,463,869 | ) | (1,463,869 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, August 31, 2011 | 33,006,283 | 13,639,786 | 919 | 1,347,740 | - | (12,698,217 | ) | 2,290,228 | |||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants | 3,553,300 | 818,341 | (919 | ) | - | - | - | 817,422 | |||||||||||||
Exercise of options | 100,000 | 23,618 | - | - | - | - | 23,618 | ||||||||||||||
Fair value of options exercised | - | 13,349 | - | (13,349 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Share-based payments | - | - | - | 71,132 | - | - | 71,132 | ||||||||||||||
Loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | (1,276,827 | ) | (1,276,827 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, August 31, 2012 | 36,659,583 | $ | 14,495,094 | $ | - | $ | 1,405,523 | $ | - | $ | (13,975,044 | ) | $ | 1,925,573 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
4
Kelso Technologies Inc. |
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss |
For the years ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
2012 | 2011 | |||||
Revenues | $ | 2,233,807 | $ | 1,326,024 | ||
Cost of Goods Sold | 1,673,434 | 1,006,062 | ||||
Gross Profit | 560,373 | 319,962 | ||||
Expenses | ||||||
Management fees (Note 11) | 392,490 | 258,193 | ||||
Consulting and investor relations | 212,601 | 147,943 | ||||
Marketing | 197,066 | 43,161 | ||||
Research | 155,073 | 110,922 | ||||
Administrative salaries | 146,894 | 217,895 | ||||
Office and general | 132,746 | 118,690 | ||||
Rent | 117,617 | 45,818 | ||||
Travel | 100,163 | 60,290 | ||||
Accounting and legal | 97,708 | 143,466 | ||||
Foreign exchange loss (gain) | 75,587 | (37,696 | ) | |||
Share-based payments (Notes 10 (b) and 11) | 71,132 | 611,052 | ||||
Insurance | 31,397 | 5,139 | ||||
Automobile | 24,323 | 20,939 | ||||
License fees | 21,506 | 31,370 | ||||
Telephone | 17,493 | 2,925 | ||||
Bank charges | 13,137 | 13,661 | ||||
Gain on settlement of debt | (14,764 | ) | (25,362 | ) | ||
Amortization of equipment and patent | 45,031 | 15,425 | ||||
1,837,200 | 1,783,831 | |||||
Net Loss and Comprehensive Loss for the Year | $ | (1,276,827 | ) | $ | (1,463,869 | ) |
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) |
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding | 34,379,896 | 28,072,327 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
5
Kelso Technologies Inc. |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
For the years ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
2012 | 2011 | |||||
Operating Activities | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,276,827 | ) | $ | (1,463,869 | ) |
Items not involving cash | ||||||
Amortization of equipment and patent | 42,239 | 15,425 | ||||
Gain on settlement of debt | (14,764 | ) | (25,362 | ) | ||
Share-based payments | 71,132 | 611,052 | ||||
(1,178,220 | ) | (862,754 | ) | |||
Changes in non-cash working capital | ||||||
Accounts receivable | (539,964 | ) | (203,641 | ) | ||
HST receivable | 65,974 | (65,423 | ) | |||
Prepaid expenses and deposit | (40,770 | ) | (44,809 | ) | ||
Inventory | (942,502 | ) | (251,171 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 495,474 | 68,758 | ||||
Due to related parties | 14,126 | (62,035 | ) | |||
(947,662 | ) | (558,321 | ) | |||
Cash Used in Operating Activities | (2,125,882 | ) | (1,421,075 | ) | ||
Investing Activities | ||||||
Deferred product costs | (36,680 | ) | (81,252 | ) | ||
Property and equipment | (133,830 | ) | (258,106 | ) | ||
Cash Used in Investing Activities | (170,510 | ) | (339,358 | ) | ||
Financing Activities | ||||||
Issue of and subscription for common shares, net of share issue costs | 841,040 | 3,022,215 | ||||
Note payable | - | (70,320 | ) | |||
Cash Provided by Financing Activities | 841,040 | 2,951,895 | ||||
Inflow (Outflow) of Cash | (1,455,352 | ) | 1,191,462 | |||
Cash, Beginning of Year | 1,457,934 | 266,472 | ||||
Cash, End of Year | $ | 2,582 | $ | 1,457,934 |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Note 16)
See notes to consolidated financial statements
6
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
1. | NATURE OF OPERATIONS | |
Kelso Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) designs, engineers, markets, produces and distributes various proprietary pressure relief valves and manway securement systems designed to reduce the risk of environmental harm due to non-accidental events in the transportation of hazardous commodities via railroad tank cars. The Company trades on the | ||
TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) under the symbol “KLS”. The Company’s head office is located at 7773 118A Street, Delta, British Columbia, V4C 6V1. | ||
2. | GOING CONCERN | |
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. | ||
The Company has experienced significant operating losses of $1,276,827 (2011 - $1,463,869) during the year ended August 31, 2012, and as at August 31, 2012 has an accumulated deficit of $13,975,044 (August 31, 2011 - $12,698,217; September 1, 2010 - $8,500,608) and working capital of $1,422,376 (August 31, 2011 - $1,916,036; September 1, 2010 - $86,212). | ||
The application of the going concern concept is dependent upon the Company’s ability to satisfy its liabilities as they become due. The Company plans to generate the necessary resources to finance operations by way of a combination of sales of its products and issuance of equity securities through private placements. | ||
The consolidated financial statements do not reflect adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that would be necessary if the going concern assumption were not appropriate. | ||
3. | BASIS OF PREPARATION AND FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL | |
REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”) | ||
(a) | Statement of compliance | |
These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). | ||
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost basis, except for financial instruments classified as available-for-sale (“AFS”) and fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”). These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting, except for cash flow information. | ||
These consolidated financial statements are the Company’s first IFRS annual financial statements. Previously, the Company prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with pre-changeover Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The impact of the transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS is explained in note 18. IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards has been applied. | ||
The significant accounting policies set out in note 4 have been applied consistently to all periods presented and in the preparation of the opening consolidated statement of financial position at September 1, 2010 (note 18) for purposes of transition to IFRS. |
7
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
3. | BASIS OF PREPARATION AND FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”) (Continued) | |
(b) | Functional and presentation currency | |
Effective August 31, 2011, the Company changed its functional currency to the United States dollar (USD) from the Canadian dollar (CAD). This is a result of the Company’s increased exposure to the USD through increased operational activity and sales in the US. As a result, the Company has determined that the functional currency effective August 31, 2011 is the USD. | ||
In accordance with IAS 21 Foreign Exchange, the Company is required to translate all amounts for the August 31, 2011 consolidated statement of financial position into the new functional currency using the exchange rate in effect at the date of the change. For the presentation currency change affecting the September 1, 2010 consolidated statement of financial position, IAS 21 requires that all amounts be presented for comparative purposes in US dollars using the current rate method whereby all revenues, expenses and cash flows are translated at average rates that were in effect during those periods and all assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate in effect at the year-end. Equity transactions have been translated at historic rates. The exchange difference resulting from the translation is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss presented in shareholders’ equity. | ||
The change in reporting currency resulted in the following impact on the September 1, 2010 opening consolidated statement of financial position with $6,478 foreign exchange loss on consolidation charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss: |
Reported at | ||||||||||
September 1, | ||||||||||
Reported at | Presentation | 2010, in USD | ||||||||
September 1, | currency | presentation | ||||||||
2010, in CAD | change | currency | ||||||||
Total current assets | $ | 473,664 | $ | (29,557 | ) | $ | 444,107 | |||
Total assets | $ | 510,587 | $ | (31,861 | ) | $ | 478,726 | |||
Total current liabilities | $ | 381,714 | $ | (23,819 | ) | $ | 357,895 | |||
Total liabilities | $ | 381,714 | $ | (23,819 | ) | $ | 357,895 | |||
Equity | $ | 128,873 | $ | (8,042 | ) | $ | 120,831 |
8
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
3. | BASIS OF PREPARATION AND FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”) (Continued) | |
(b) | Functional and presentation currency (Continued) | |
The change in functional currency resulted in the following impact on the August 31, 2011 consolidated statement of financial position: |
Reported at | ||||||||||
August 31, | ||||||||||
Reported at | Functional | 2011, in USD | ||||||||
August 31, | currency | functional | ||||||||
2011, in CAD | change | currency | ||||||||
Total current assets | $ | 2,140,032 | $ | 44,941 | $ | 2,184,973 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 2,506,527 | $ | 52,638 | $ | 2,559,165 | ||||
Total current liabilities | $ | 263,404 | $ | 5,533 | $ | 268,937 | ||||
Total liabilities | $ | 263,404 | $ | 5,533 | $ | 268,937 | ||||
Equity | $ | 2,243,123 | $ | 47,105 | $ | 2,290,228 |
During the year ended August 31, 2011, the consolidated statement of changes in equity included adjustments of: $2,622,623 to capital stock, $104,639 to share-based payments reserve and $6,478 to accumulated other comprehensive loss, with a total of $2,733,740 offset to deficit. This was due to equity transactions translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date of the change of functional currency whereas previously these amounts were translated at historic rates. | |||
(c) | Use of estimates and judgments | ||
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include: | |||
(i) | The determination of the fair value of stock options and warrants using stock pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions could materially affect the fair value estimate. | ||
(ii) | The determination of deferred income tax assets or liabilities requires subjective assumptions regarding future income tax rates and the likelihood of utilizing tax carry-forwards. Changes in these assumptions could materially affect the recorded amounts and, therefore, do not necessarily provide certainty as to their recorded values. | ||
(iii) | The assessment of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern involves judgment regarding future funding available for its product development and working capital requirements. |
9
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
3. | BASIS OF PREPARATION AND FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”) (Continued) | ||
(c) | Use of estimates and judgments (Continued) | ||
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. | |||
(d) | Approval of the consolidated financial statements | ||
The consolidated financial statements of Kelso Technologies Inc. for the year ended August 31, 2012 were approved and authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on December 12, 2012. | |||
(e) | New accounting pronouncements | ||
All of the new and revised standards described below may be early-adopted. | |||
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (2009) | |||
IFRS 9 introduces new requirements for classifying and measuring financial assets, as follows: | |||
Debt instruments meeting both a “business model” test and a “cash flow characteristics” test are measured at amortized cost (the use of fair value is optional in some limited circumstances) | |||
Investments in equity instruments can be designated as “fair value through other comprehensive income” with only dividends being recognized in profit or loss | |||
All other instruments (including all derivatives) are measured at fair value with changes recognized in the profit or loss. | |||
The concept of “embedded derivatives” does not apply to financial assets within the scope of the standard and the entire instrument must be classified and measured in accordance with the above guidelines. | |||
This standard is only applicable if it is optionally adopted for annual periods beginning before January 1, 2015. For annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015, the Company must adopt IFRS 9 (2010). | |||
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (2010) | |||
This is a revised version of IFRS 9 incorporating revised requirements for the classification and measurement of financial liabilities, and carrying over the existing de-recognition requirements from IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. | |||
The revised financial liability provisions maintain the existing amortized cost measurement basis for most liabilities. New requirements apply where an entity chooses to measure a liability at FVTPL; in these cases, the portion of the change in fair value related to changes in the entity's own credit risk is presented in other comprehensive income (loss) rather than within profit or loss. |
10
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
3. | BASIS OF PREPARATION AND FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”) (Continued) | ||
(e) | New accounting pronouncements (Continued) | ||
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (2010) (Continued) | |||
This standard applies to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015 and supersedes IFRS 9 (2009). However, for annual reporting periods beginning before January 1, 2015, an entity may early-adopt IFRS 9 (2009) instead of applying this standard. | |||
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement | |||
This IFRS standard defines fair value, provides guidance on how to determine fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. However, IFRS 13 does not change the requirements regarding which items should be measured or disclosed at fair value. | |||
IFRS 13 applies when another IFRS requires or permits fair value measurements or disclosures about fair value measurements (and measurements, such as fair value less costs to sell, based on fair value or disclosures about those measurements). With some exceptions, the standard requires entities to classify these measurements into a “fair value hierarchy” based on the nature of the inputs: | |||
Level 1 - quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date | |||
Level 2 - inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly | |||
Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. | |||
Entities are required to make various disclosures depending upon the nature of the fair value measurement (e.g., whether it is recognized in the financial statements or merely disclosed) and the level in which it is classified. | |||
This standard applies to annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. | |||
Amendments to IFRS 12 Income Taxes | |||
Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets (Amendments to IAS 12) amends IAS 12 | |||
Income Taxes to provide a presumption that recovery of the carrying amount of an asset measured using the fair value model in IAS 40 Investment Property will, normally, be through sale. | |||
As a result of the amendments, SIC-21 Income Taxes — Recovery of Revalued Non- Depreciable Assets would no longer apply to investment properties carried at fair value. The amendments also incorporate into IAS 12 the remaining guidance previously contained in SIC-21, which is accordingly withdrawn. | |||
Applicable to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012. |
11
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
3. | BASIS OF PREPARATION AND FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”) (Continued) | ||
(e) | New accounting pronouncements (Continued) | ||
Amendments to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures | |||
Disclosures — Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments to IFRS 7) amends the disclosure requirements in IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures to require information about all recognized financial instruments that are set off in accordance with paragraph 42 of IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation. | |||
The amendments also require disclosure of information about recognized financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements even if they are not set off under IAS 32. | |||
Applicable to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those periods. | |||
Amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation | |||
Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments to IAS 32) amends IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation to clarify certain aspects because of diversity in application of the requirements on offsetting, focused on four main areas: | |||
- | The meaning of “currently has a legally enforceable right of set-off” | ||
- | The application of simultaneous realization and settlement | ||
- | The offsetting of collateral amounts | ||
- | The unit of account for applying the offsetting requirements. |
Applicable to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.
4. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | |
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and are stated in USD, which is the Company’s functional and reporting currency. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies. | ||
(a) | Basis of presentation and consolidation | |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its integrated wholly-owned subsidiaries, Kelso Technologies (USA) Inc. and Kelso Innovative Solutions Inc., both are Nevada, USA, corporations. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. |
12
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
4. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) | |
(b) | Property and equipment | |
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is calculated over the estimated useful life of the property and equipment on a declining- balance basis at the following rates: |
Building | – 4% |
Leasehold improvements | – 20% |
Production equipment | – 20% |
Vehicles | – 30% |
Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In the year of acquisition, amortization is recorded based on one-half of annual amortization. | ||
(c) | Research and development | |
Research costs are expensed as incurred. Product and technology development costs, which meet the criteria for deferral and are expected to provide future benefits with reasonable certainty, are deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the products or technology. In 2011 the Company commenced deferring development costs associated with the manway securement systems. In the year of deferral of product costs, the Company does not record amortization. | ||
(d) | Patent costs | |
Patents are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over their 13-year protective term. The patents are tested for impairment on an annual basis or when events occur that may indicate impairment. If there are indications of impairment, the unamortized balance is charged to operations in the period. | ||
(e) | Revenue recognition | |
Revenues are recognized when the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer based on the terms of the sale, collection of the relevant receivable is probable, evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable. Risk and rewards of ownership pass to the customer upon shipment or upon invoicing depending on the agreement with the customer. Provisions for sales discounts, returns and miscellaneous claims from customers are made at the time of sale. | ||
(f) | Inventory | |
Inventory components include raw materials and supplies used to assemble valves and manway covers, as well as finished valves and manway covers. All inventories are recorded at the lower of cost and net realizable value on a first-in, first-out basis. The stated value of all inventories includes raw materials and supplies purchase and assembly costs, and attributable overhead and amortization. A regular review is undertaken to determine the extent of any provision for obsolescence. |
13
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
4. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) | |
(g) | Income taxes | |
Income tax expense, consisting of current and deferred tax expense, is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. Current tax expense is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at period-end, adjusted for amendments to tax payable with regard to previous years. | ||
Deferred tax assets and liabilities and the related deferred income tax expense or recovery are recognized for deferred tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that substantive enactment occurs. | ||
A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilized. To the extent that the Company does not consider it probable that a deferred tax asset will be recovered, the deferred tax asset is reduced. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. | ||
(h) | Foreign currency translation | |
The accounts of foreign operations are translated into USD as follows: |
(i) | Monetary assets and liabilities, at the rate of exchange in effect at the statement of financial position date; | |
(ii) | Non-monetary assets and liabilities, at the exchange rates prevailing at the time of the acquisition of the assets or assumption of the liabilities; and | |
(iii) | Revenue and expense items (excluding amortization, which is translated at the same rate as the related asset), at the rate of exchange prevailing at the transaction date. |
Gains and losses arising from translation of foreign currency are included in the determination of net loss. | ||
(i) | Earnings (loss) per share | |
The Company presents basic earnings (loss) per share data for its common shares, calculated by dividing the loss attributable to common shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The Company uses the treasury stock method for calculating diluted earnings (loss) per share. Under this method the dilutive effect on earnings per share is calculated on the use of the proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options, warrants and similar instruments. It assumes that the proceeds of such exercise would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period. However, the calculation of diluted loss per share excludes the effects of various conversions and exercise of options and warrants that would be anti- dilutive. |
14
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
4. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) | |
(j) | Share-based payments | |
The Company grants share options to acquire common shares of the Company to directors, officers, employees and consultants. The fair value of share-based payments to employees is measured at grant date, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and is recognized over the vesting period for employees using the graded vesting method. Fair value of share-based payments for non-employees is recognized and measured at the date the goods or services are received based on the fair value of the goods or services received. If it is determined that the fair value of goods and services received cannot be reliably measured, the share-based payment is measured at the fair value of the equity instruments issued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. | ||
For both employees and non-employees, the fair value of share-based payments is recognized as an expense with a corresponding increase in option reserves. The amount recognized as expense is adjusted to reflect the number of share options expected to vest. Consideration received on the exercise of stock options is recorded in capital stock and the related share-based payment in option reserves is transferred to capital stock. For those options that expire or are forfeited after vesting, the recorded value is transferred to deficit. | ||
(k) | Capital stock | |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants are recorded as capital stock in the amount for which the option or warrant enabled the holder to purchase a share in the Company. Capital stock issued for non-monetary consideration is valued at the closing market price at the date of issuance. The proceeds from the issuance of units are allocated between common shares and warrants based on the residual value method. Under this method, the proceeds are allocated first to capital stock based on the fair value of the common shares at the time the units are priced and any residual value is allocated to the warrants reserve. Consideration received for the exercise of warrants is recorded in capital stock and the related residual value is transferred to capital stock. | ||
(l) | Cash | |
Cash consists of cash at banks and on hand. | ||
(m) | Related party transactions | |
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operating decisions. Parties are also considered to be related if they are subject to common control. Related parties may be individuals or corporate entities. A transaction is considered to be a related party transaction when there is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties. |
15
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
4. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) | ||
(n) | Financial instruments | ||
(i) | Financial assets | ||
The Company classifies its financial assets in the following categories: FVTPL, held- to-maturity investments, loans and receivables, and available-for-sale (“AFS”). The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of assets at recognition. All financial instruments are required to be measured at fair value on initial recognition. Measurement in subsequent periods is dependent upon the classification of the financial instrument. | |||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | |||
Financial assets are classified as FVTPL when the financial asset is held-for-trading or is designated as FVTPL. A financial asset is classified as FVTPL when it has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near future, it is a part of an identified portfolio of financial instruments that the Company manages and has an actual pattern of short-term profit-taking or if it is a derivative that is not designated and effective as a hedging instrument. Upon initial recognition, attributable transaction costs are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Financial instruments at FVTPL are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognized in profit or loss. Cash is included in this category of financial assets. | |||
Held-to maturity investments | |||
Held-to-maturity financial assets are non-derivative financial assets measured at amortized cost that management has the intention and ability to hold to maturity. | |||
Loans and receivables | |||
Trade receivables, loans and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are initially recognized at the transaction value and subsequently carried at amortized cost less impairment losses. The impairment loss on receivables is based on a review of all outstanding amounts at period-end. Bad debts are written off during the year in which they are identified. Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate method. | |||
Available-for-sale financial assets | |||
AFS financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are either designated as AFS or not classified in any of the other financial asset categories. Changes in the fair value of AFS financial assets other than impairment losses are recognized as other comprehensive income (loss) and classified as a component of equity. The Company has not classified any financial assets as AFS. |
16
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
4. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) | |||
(n) | Financial instruments (Continued) | |||
(i) | Financial assets (Continued) | |||
Effective interest method | ||||
The effective interest method calculates the amortized cost of a financial asset and allocates interest income over the corresponding period. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash receipts over the expected life of the financial asset or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount on initial recognition. | ||||
Impairment of financial assets | ||||
Financial assets, other than those at FVTPL, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each period-end. Financial assets are impaired when there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated future cash flows of the investment have been impacted. | ||||
Objective evidence of impairment could include the following: | ||||
significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; | ||||
default or delinquency in interest or principal payments; or | ||||
it has become probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganization. | ||||
For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows, discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. | ||||
The carrying amount of all financial assets, excluding trade receivables, is directly reduced by the impairment loss. The carrying amount of trade receivables is reduced through the use of an allowance account. When a trade receivable is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in profit or loss. | ||||
With the exception of AFS equity instruments, if, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease relates to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss. On the date of impairment reversal, the carrying amount of the financial asset cannot exceed its amortized cost had impairment not been recognized. |
17
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
4. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) | ||
(n) | Financial instruments (Continued) | ||
(ii) | Financial liabilities | ||
The Company classifies its financial liabilities in the following categories: as FVTPL or other financial liabilities. | |||
Fair value through profit or loss | |||
Financial liabilities classified as FVTPL include financial liabilities held-for-trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as FVTPL. Fair value changes on financial liabilities classified as FVTPL are recognized in profit or loss. | |||
Other financial liabilities | |||
Other financial liabilities are non-derivatives and are recognized initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred, and are subsequently stated at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. Any difference between the amounts originally received, net of transaction costs, and the redemption value is recognized in profit or loss over the period to maturity using the effective interest method. Other financial liabilities are classified as current or non-current based on their maturity date. | |||
Other financial liabilities are classified as current or non-current based on their maturity date. Financial liabilities include trade accounts payable, other payables, deferred credits and loans. | |||
Derivative financial liabilities | |||
Derivatives, including separated embedded derivatives, are classified as held-for- trading and recognized at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in profit or loss unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. | |||
(iii) | Fair value hierarchy | ||
Fair value measurements of financial instruments are required to be classified using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of inputs used in making the measurements. The levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows: |
Level 1: | Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | |
Level 2: | Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly | |
Level 3: | Inputs for assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data. |
18
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
5. | CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | |
The Company considers its capital to be comprised of shareholders’ equity. | ||
The Company’s objectives in managing its capital are to maintain its ability to continue as a going concern and to further develop its business. To effectively manage the Company’s capital requirements, the Company has a planning and budgeting process in place to meet its strategic goals. | ||
Although the Company has been successful at raising funds in the past through the issuance of capital stock, it is uncertain whether it will continue this method of financing due to the current difficult market conditions. | ||
In order to facilitate the management of its capital requirements, the Company prepares expenditure budgets that are updated as necessary depending on various factors, including successful capital deployment and general industry conditions. Management reviews the capital structure on a regular basis to ensure the above objectives are met. There have been no changes to the Company’s approach to capital management during the year. There are no externally-imposed restrictions on the Company’s capital. | ||
6. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | |
Financial instruments are agreements between two parties that result in promises to pay or receive cash or equity instruments. The Company classifies its financial instruments as follows: cash is classified as a financial asset at FVTPL; accounts receivable is classified as loans and receivables; and due to related parties and accounts payable are classified as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost. The carrying value of these instruments approximates their fair values due to their short term to maturity. | ||
The Company has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments: | ||
Credit risk; | ||
Liquidity risk; and | ||
Market risk. |
(a) | Credit risk | |
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to discharge an obligation. Cash is placed with a major Canadian financial institution. With respect to its accounts receivable, the Company assesses the credit rating of all customers and maintains provisions for potential credit losses, and any such losses to date have been within management’s expectations. The Company’s concentration of credit risk and maximum exposure thereto is $2,582 (August 31, 2011 - $1,457,934; September 1, 2010 - $266,472) in cash and $877,526 (August 31, 2011 - $337,562; September 1, 2010 - $133,921) in accounts receivable. |
19
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
6. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued) | ||
(b) | Liquidity risk | ||
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will be unable to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will have sufficient liquid funds to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Company’s reputation. At August 31, 2012, the Company has $2,582 (August 31, 2011 - $1,457,934; September 1, 2010 - $266,472) of cash to settle current liabilities with the following due dates: accounts payable of $747,411 (August 31, 2011 - $251,937; September 1, 2010 - $183,179) are due within three months and; due to related party balances of $16,362 (August 31, 2011 - $17,000; September 1, 2010 - $104,396) are due on demand. The Company closed a private placement subsequent to year-end (note 17). | |||
(c) | Market risk | ||
The significant market risks to which the Company is exposed are interest rate risk and currency risk. | |||
(i) | Interest rate risk | ||
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates. The Company’s cash consists of cash held in bank accounts that earn interest at variable rates. Due to the short-term nature of this financial instrument, fluctuations in market rates of interest do not have a significant impact on the estimated fair value or future cash flows. | |||
(ii) | Currency risk | ||
The Company is exposed to currency risk to the extent expenditures incurred or funds received and balances maintained by the Company are denominated in CAD. The Company does not manage currency risk through hedging or other currency management tools. | |||
As at August 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s net exposure to foreign currency risk is as follows (in CAD): |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Net assets | $ | 49,130 | $ | 1,422,305 |
Based on the above, assuming all other variables remain constant, a 1.5% weakening or strengthening of the USD against the CAD would result in approximately $740 (August 31, 2011 - $nil) foreign exchange loss or gain in the consolidated statements of operations. | ||
(iii) | Other price risk | |
Other price risk is the risk that the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk. The Company is not exposed to other price risk. |
20
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
7. | INVENTORY |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Finished goods | $ | 528,188 | $ | 210,375 | |||
Raw materials and supplies | 668,277 | 40,796 | |||||
$ | 1,196,465 | $ | 251,171 |
8. | PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
Leasehold | Production | |||||||||||||||||
Land | Building | improvements | equipment | Vehicles | Total | |||||||||||||
Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 1, 2010 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Additions | 12,146 | 116,314 | 25,643 | 98,375 | - | 252,478 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment for functional currency change | 256 | 2,443 | 537 | 2,066 | - | 5,302 | ||||||||||||
Balance, August 31, 2011 | 12,402 | 118,757 | 26,180 | 100,441 | - | 257,780 | ||||||||||||
Additions | 156 | 44,335 | 6,430 | 55,235 | 27,674 | 133,830 | ||||||||||||
Balance, August 31, 2012 | $ | 12,558 | $ | 163,092 | $ | 32,610 | $ | 155,676 | $ | 27,674 | $ | 391,610 | ||||||
Accumulated Amortization | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 1, 2010 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
Charge for year | - | 2,326 | 2,564 | 9,838 | - | 14,728 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment for functional currency change | - | 49 | 54 | 206 | - | 309 | ||||||||||||
Balance, August 31, 2011 | - | 2,375 | 2,618 | 10,044 | - | 15,037 | ||||||||||||
Charge for year | - | 5,446 | 5,259 | 25,090 | 4,151 | 39,946 | ||||||||||||
Balance, August 31, 2012 | $ | - | $ | 7,821 | $ | 7,877 | 35,134 | $ | 4,151 | $ | 54,983 | |||||||
Carrying Value | ||||||||||||||||||
September 1, 2010 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
August 31, 2011 | $ | 12,402 | $ | 116,382 | $ | 23,562 | $ | 90,397 | $ | - | $ | 242,743 | ||||||
August 31, 2012 | $ | 12,558 | $ | 155,271 | $ | 24,733 | $ | 120,542 | $ | 23,523 | $ | 336,627 |
21
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
9. | PATENT AND ROYALTY OBLIGATION |
Patent | ||||
Cost | ||||
Balance, September 1, 2010 | $ | 37,504 | ||
Effect of functional currency change | 3,336 | |||
Balance, August 31, 2011 | 40,840 | |||
Additions | - | |||
Balance, August 31, 2012 | $ | 40,840 | ||
Accumulated Amortization | ||||
Balance, September 1, 2010 | $ | 2,885 | ||
Effect of functional currency change | 513 | |||
Charge for year | 2,885 | |||
Balance, August 31, 2011 | 6,283 | |||
Charge for year | 5,085 | |||
Balance, August 31, 2012 | $ | 11,368 | ||
Carrying Value | ||||
September 1, 2010 | $ | 34,619 | ||
August 31, 2011 | $ | 34,557 | ||
August 31, 2012 | $ | 29,472 |
The Company is obligated to pay a 5% royalty from sales of their manway securement systems. During the year ended August 31, 2012, there were no revenues from sales of the manway securement systems. The Company also holds a number of other patents, which have been fully amortized as at August 31, 2012. | ||
10. | CAPITAL STOCK | |
Authorized: | ||
Unlimited Class A non-cumulative, preference shares without par value, of which 5,000,000 are designated Class A, convertible, voting, preference shares | ||
Unlimited common shares without par value | ||
Issued: | ||
(a) | Common shares | |
No common shares were issued for private placements during the year ended August 31, 2012. |
22
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
10. | CAPITAL STOCK (Continued) | ||
(a) | Common shares (Continued) | ||
Private placements – August 31, 2011 | |||
(i) | On December 22, 2010, the Company completed a private placement of 6,938,000 units at a price of CAD$0.25 per unit for gross proceeds of $1,754,273. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one share purchase warrant. One whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share at CAD$0.35 until December 22, 2012. The Company issued 14,400 common shares to agents valued at CAD$0.25 per share for a fair value of $3,641 and paid $115,885 in finder’s fees. | ||
(ii) | On July 25, 2011, the Company completed a private placement of 2,000,000 units at a price of CAD$0.50 per unit for gross proceeds of $1,011,400. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one share purchase warrant. One whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share at CAD$0.70 until July 25, 2013. The Company paid $88,194 in finder’s fees. | ||
(b) | Stock options | ||
The Company has a stock option plan (the “Plan”) available to employees, directors, officers and consultants with grants under the Plan approved from time to time by the Board of Directors. Under the Plan, the Company is authorized to issue options to purchase an aggregate of up to 10% of the Company's issued and outstanding common shares. Each option can be exercised to acquire one common share of the Company. The exercise price for an option granted under the Plan may not be less than the market price at the date of grant less a specified discount dependent on the market price. | |||
Options to purchase common shares have been granted to directors, employees and consultants as follows: |
Exercise | |||||||||||||||
Price | Expiry | August 31, 2012 | August 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
(CAD) | Date | Outstanding | Exercisable | Outstanding | Exercisable | ||||||||||
$0.24 | December 7, 2011 | - | - | 143,000 | 143,000 | ||||||||||
$0.70 | January 31, 2012 | - | - | 114,286 | 114,286 | ||||||||||
$0.52 | February 2, 2012 | - | - | 300,000 | 75,000 | ||||||||||
$0.70 | November 8, 2012* | 58,213 | 58,213 | 58,213 | 58,213 | ||||||||||
$0.70 | May 26, 2013 | 10,929 | 10,929 | 10,929 | 10,929 | ||||||||||
$0.24 | December 7, 2013 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 125,000 | ||||||||||
$0.55 | February 9, 2014 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 75,000 | ||||||||||
$0.65 | November 25, 2014 | 150,000 | 75,000 | - | - | ||||||||||
$0.24 | June 2, 2015 | 600,000 | 600,000 | 600,000 | 450,000 | ||||||||||
$0.25 | June 14, 2015 | - | - | 300,000 | 225,000 | ||||||||||
$0.24 | October 4, 2015 | 554,000 | 554,000 | 554,000 | 259,000 | ||||||||||
$0.58 | July 22, 2016 | 420,000 | 420,000 | 420,000 | 420,000 | ||||||||||
$0.58 | August 25, 2016 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||||||
$0.70 | October 7, 2019 | 28,571 | 28,571 | 28,571 | 28,571 | ||||||||||
2,321,713 | 2,246,713 | 3,028,999 | 2,083,999 |
* | Subsequent to the year-end, these options expired unexercised. |
23
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
10. | CAPITAL STOCK (Continued) | |
(b) | Stock options (Continued) | |
A summary of the Company’s stock options as at August 31, 2012 and 2011 and changes for the years then ended are as follows: |
Weighted | |||||||
Average | |||||||
Exercise | |||||||
Price | |||||||
Number | (CAD) | ||||||
Outstanding, September 1, 2010 | 1,411,999 | $ | 0.31 | ||||
Granted | 1,935,000 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
Cancelled | (300,000 | ) | $ | 0.24 | |||
Expired | (18,000 | ) | $ | 0.24 | |||
Outstanding, August 31, 2011 | 3,028,999 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
Granted | 150,000 | - | |||||
Expired/Cancelled | (757,286 | ) | $ | 0.42 | |||
Exercised | (100,000 | ) | $ | 0.24 | |||
Outstanding, August 31, 2012 | 2,321,713 | $ | 0.38 |
The weighted average contractual life for the remaining options at August 31, 2012 is 2.8 (2011 - 3.3) years. During the year ended August 31, 2012, the Company raised $23,618 through the exercise of 100,000 share purchase options (2011 - $4,369 through the exercise of 18,000 share purchase options); $13,349 was reclassified from contributed surplus to capital stock for the fair value of these options (2011 - $2,884).
Share-based payments
Share-based payments of $71,132 (2011 - $611,052) was recognized in the year ended August 31, 2012 for stock options issued and the vesting of options issued in the prior year.
The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with assumptions as follows:
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate (average) | 1.09% | 1.85% | |||||
Estimated volatility (average) | 115% | 123% | |||||
Expected life | 2.35 years | 3.7 years | |||||
Expected dividend yield | - | - | |||||
Grant date fair value per option | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.31 |
Option pricing models require the use of highly subjective estimates and assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Changes in the underlying assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates.
24
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
10. | CAPITAL STOCK (Continued) | |
(c) | Share purchase warrants | |
As at August 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company has share purchase warrants outstanding entitling the holders to acquire common shares as follows: |
Exercise | Outstanding | Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
Price | Expiry | August 31, | August 31, | |||||||||||||||
(CAD) | Date | 2011 | Issued | Exercised | Expired | 2012 | ||||||||||||
$1.05** | October 31, 2014 | 1,059,029 | - | - | - | 1,059,029 | ||||||||||||
$0.18 | May 25, 2012 | 2,182,500 | - | 2,182,500 | - | - | ||||||||||||
$0.25 | August 31, 2012 | 496,800 | - | 496,800 | - | - | ||||||||||||
$0.35 | December 22, 2012 | 3,244,000 | - | 874,000 | - | 2,370,000 | ||||||||||||
$0.70 | July 25, 2013 | 1,000,000 | - | - | - | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||
7,982,329 | - | 3,553,300 | - | 4,429,029 |
Exercise | Outstanding | Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
Price | Expiry | August 31, | August 31, | |||||||||||||||
(CAD) | Date | 2010 | Issued | Exercised | Expired | 2011 | ||||||||||||
$0.70 | September 17, 2010 | 671,710 | - | - | 671,710 | - | ||||||||||||
$0.70 | July 2, 2011 | 1,535,154 | - | - | 1,535,154 | - | ||||||||||||
$0.70 | October 31, 2014 | 1,059,029 | - | - | - | 1,059,029 | ||||||||||||
$0.18 | May 25, 2012 | 4,135,000 | - | 1,952,500 | - | 2,182,500 | ||||||||||||
$0.25 | August 31, 2012 | 576,800 | - | 80,000 | - | 496,800 | ||||||||||||
$0.35 | December 22, 2012 | - | 3,469,000 | 225,000 | - | 3,244,000 | ||||||||||||
$0.70 | July 25, 2013 | - | 1,000,000 | - | - | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||
7,977,693 | 4,469,000 | 2,257,500 | 2,206,864 | 7,982,329 |
** | Exercisable at $1.05 from October 31, 2011 until October 30, 2012, at $2.10 from October 31, 2012 until October 30, 2013 and at $5.25 from October 31, 2013 until October 30, 2014. |
During the year ended August 31, 2012, the Company raised $818,341 through the exercise of 3,553,300 share purchase warrants (2011 - $455,332 through the exercise of 2,257,500 share purchase warrants).
11. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Related party transactions not otherwise described in these consolidated financial statements are shown below. These amounts of key management compensation are included in the amounts shown on the consolidated statements of operations:
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Management fees | $ | 392,490 | $ | 258,193 | |||
Share-based payments* | $ | 17,071 | $ | 332,525 |
*Share based-payments consists of the related parties’ portion of the fair value of options granted calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at their fair value.
25
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
11. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued) |
As at August 31, 2012, amounts due to related parties, which are unsecured and have no interest or specified terms of payments, are $16,362 (August 31, 2011 - $17,000; September 1, 2010 - $104,396) for reimbursement of expenses to a director of the Company. These amounts are due on demand. | |
12. | COMMITMENT |
The Company is committed to making the following payments for base rent on its lab in Lisle, Illinois. |
2013 | 2014 | Total | ||||||||
Lab rental cost | $ | 41,874 | $ | 10,532 | $ | 52,406 |
13. | NOTE PAYABLE |
The $70,320 note payable was due to a former officer of the Company. The note was unsecured and non-interest-bearing with repayment terms of a minimum rate of $4,688 per month beginning April 16, 2010, or as soon thereafter as funds are available to the Company, and the same amount every month thereafter or sooner if funds permit. The full amount was repaid during the year ended August 31, 2011. | |
14. | INCOME TAXES |
As at August 31, 2012, the Company has accumulated non-capital losses for tax purposes in Canada of approximately $5,683,000 that may be carried forward to apply against future years' income for income tax purposes. The losses expire as follows: |
2014 | $ | 165,000 | ||
2015 | 701,000 | |||
2026 | 502,000 | |||
2027 | 625,000 | |||
2028 | 704,000 | |||
2029 | 619,000 | |||
2030 | 130,000 | |||
2031 | 997,000 | |||
2032 | 1,240,000 | |||
$ | 5,683,000 |
The Company has approximately $14,000 in non-capital losses in the US that may be applied against future taxable income (expiring in 2025 or later). Additionally, the Company has net capital losses of approximately $137,000 that can be applied against future net capital gains. These losses can be carried forward indefinitely.
Effective January 1, 2011, the Canadian federal corporate tax rate decreased from 18.0% to 16.5% and the British Columbia provincial tax decreased from 10.5% to 10.0%. The overall reduction in tax rates has resulted in a decrease in the Company’s statutory tax rate from 28.5% to 26.5%.
26
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
14. | INCOME TAXES (Continued) |
The tax effected items that give rise to significant portions of the deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities at August 31, 2012 and 2011 are presented below: |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Non-capital losses carried forward | $ | 36,778 | $ | 28,879 | |||
Excess of carrying value of deferred product costs over tax basis | (29,483 | ) | (20,313 | ) | |||
Excess of carrying value of patent over tax basis | (7,295 | ) | (8,566 | ) | |||
Unrecognized deductible temporary differences | $ | - | $ | - |
Significant unrecognized tax benefits and unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset is recognized as of August 31 are as follows:
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Non-capital losses carried forward | |||||||
Canada | $ | 5,575,484 | $ | 4,462,876 | |||
United States | 13,639 | 13,639 | |||||
Excess of undepreciated capital cost over carrying value of fixed assets | 65,084 | 23,800 | |||||
Excess of accumulated exploration expenditures over carrying value of mineral properties | 144,912 | 145,925 | |||||
Capital losses (Canada) | 75,232 | 76,214 | |||||
Share issue costs | 168,172 | 236,217 | |||||
Unrecognized deductible temporary differences | $ | 6,042,523 | $ | 4,958,671 |
Income tax expense differs from the amount that would be computed by applying the Canadian statutory income tax rate of 26.50% (2011 - 27.17%) to income before income taxes.
A reconciliation of income taxes at statutory rates with reported taxes is as follows:
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Net loss for year | $ | (1,276,827 | ) | $ | (1,463,869 | ) | |
Statutory income tax rate | 26.50% | 27.17% | |||||
Income tax benefit computed at statutory tax rate | (338,359 | ) | (397,733 | ) | |||
Items not deductible for income tax purposes | 18,850 | 166,920 | |||||
Change in timing differences | 22,455 | (49,878 | ) | ||||
Impact of foreign exchange on tax assets and liabilities | 8,476 | (85,031 | ) | ||||
Effect of change in tax rate | 17,615 | 22,086 | |||||
Unused tax losses and tax offsets not recognized | 270,963 | 343,636 | |||||
Deferred income tax expense (recovery) | $ | - | $ | - |
27
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
15. | COMPARATIVE FIGURES |
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. | |
16. | SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Non-cash financing activities | $ | - | $ | 2,397 | |||
Amortization of property and equipment allocated to cost of sales | $ | - | $ | 167 | |||
Amortization of property and equipment allocated to inventory | $ | 2,792 | $ | - | |||
Interest paid | $ | - | $ | - | |||
Income taxes paid | $ | - | $ | - |
17. | EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD | |
(a) | The Company raised CAD $18,550 pursuant to the exercise of 53,000 share purchase warrants. | |
(b) | The Company completed a private placement for gross proceeds of $1,197,000. The Company issued 1,995,000 units, each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of one share purchase. One whole warrant and $0.80 will allow the holder thereof to purchase an additional common share until September 28, 2014. | |
18. | FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS | |
The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2012 are the first annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. IFRS 1 requires that comparative financial information be provided. As a result, the first date at which the Company applied IFRS was September 1, 2010 (the “Transition Date”). IFRS 1 provides for certain optional exemptions and certain mandatory exceptions for first-time IFRS adoption. | ||
Prior to transition to IFRS, the Company prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with pre-changeover Canadian GAAP. | ||
The IFRS 1 applicable exemption and exception applied in the conversion from pre- changeover Canadian GAAP to IFRS are as follows: | ||
Optional Exemption | ||
Share-based payment transactions | ||
The Company has elected not to retrospectively apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payment to equity instruments that were granted and had vested before the Transition Date. The Company did not have any unvested outstanding equity instruments as of the Transition Date. |
28
KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Years Ended August 31, 2012 and 2011 |
(Expressed in US Dollars) |
18. | FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS (Continued) |
Mandatory Exception | |
Estimates | |
The estimates previously made by the Company under pre-changeover Canadian GAAP were not revised for the application of IFRS except where necessary to reflect any difference in accounting policy or where there was objective evidence that those estimates were in error. As a result the Company has not used hindsight to revise estimates. | |
As part of the Company’s transition to IFRS, the Company is required to restate comparative information that was previously reported under Canadian GAAP in accordance with IFRS. In addition, the Company is required to reconcile certain balances reported under Canadian GAAP to those reported under IFRS. The specific reconciliations required are: |
August 31, | September 1, | ||||||
Total Equity Reconciliation | 2011 | 2010 | |||||
Total equity per Canadian GAAP | $ | 2,290,228 | $ | 120,831 | |||
Total equity per IFRS | $ | 2,290,228 | $ | 120,831 |
Year | ||||
ended | ||||
August 31, | ||||
Total Comprehensive Loss or Income Reconciliation | 2011 | |||
Comprehensive loss per Canadian GAAP | $ | (1,463,869 | ) | |
Comprehensive loss per IFRS | $ | (1,463,869 | ) |
Management has determined that the adoption of IFRS has not resulted in any adjustments to these balances as reported previously under Canadian GAAP. There are no differences between IFRS and Canadian GAAP in connection with the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended August 31, 2011, accordingly, no reconciliation is provided.
29