Jiuzi (JZXN)

Filed: 7 Jul 21, 4:24pm

Exhibit 5.1




Our refELR/776654-000001/20107730v1


Jiuzi Holdings Inc.

4F No. 1 Building, Jinsha Lake Business Center

Economic Technology District

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311103


People’s Republic of China


7 July 2021


Dear Sirs


Jiuzi Holdings Inc. (the “Company”)


We have acted as Cayman Islands legal counsel to the Company in connection with a registration statement on Form S-8 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on 7 July 2021 (the “Registration Statement”) relating to the registration under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”) of 1,000,000 ordinary shares, par value US$0.001 per share (the “Shares”), issuable under our Equity Incentive Plan, dated as of 6 July 2021 (the “Plan”).


For the purposes of giving this opinion, we have examined copies of the Registration Statement and the Plans. We have also reviewed copies of the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association of the Company adopted by a special resolution passed on 31 October 2020 (the “Memorandum and Articles”) and the written resolutions of the board of directors of the Company dated 6 July 2021 (together, the “Resolutions”).


Based upon, and subject to, the assumptions and qualifications set out below, and having regard to such legal considerations as we deem relevant, we are of the opinion that:


1.The Shares to be issued by the Company and registered under the Registration Statement have been duly and validly authorized.


2.When issued and paid for in accordance with the terms of the Plans and in accordance with the Resolutions, and appropriate entries are made in the register of members (shareholders) of the Company, the Shares will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.


In this opinion letter, the phrase “non-assessable” means, with respect to the issuance of Shares, that a shareholder shall not, in respect of the relevant Shares, have any obligation to make further contributions to the Company’s assets (except in exceptional circumstances, such as involving fraud, the establishment of an agency relationship or an illegal or improper purpose or other circumstances in which a court may be prepared to pierce or lift the corporate veil).







These opinions are subject to the qualification that under the Companies Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands, the register of members of a Cayman Islands company is by statute regarded as prima facie evidence of any matters which the Companies Act (As Revised) directs or authorises to be inserted therein. A third party interest in the shares in question would not appear. An entry in the register of members may yield to a court order for rectification (for example, in the event of fraud or manifest error).


These opinions are given only as to, and based on, circumstances and matters of fact existing and known to us on the date of this opinion letter. These opinions only relate to the laws of the Cayman Islands which are in force on the date of this opinion letter. We express no opinion as to the meaning, validity or effect of any references to foreign (i.e. non-Cayman Islands) statutes, rules, regulations, codes, judicial authority or any other promulgations.


We have also relied upon the assumptions, which we have not independently verified, that (a) all signatures, initials and seals are genuine, (b) copies of documents, conformed copies or drafts of documents provided to us are true and complete copies of, or in the final forms of, the originals, (c) there is nothing contained in the minute book or corporate records of the Company (which we have not inspected) which would or might affect the opinions set out above, and (d) upon the issue of any Shares, the consideration received by the Company shall be not less than the par value of such Shares.


We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and further consent to all references to us in the Registration Statement and any amendments thereto. In giving such consent, we do not consider that we are “experts” within the meaning of such term as used in the Securities Act, or the rules and regulations of the Commission issued thereunder, with respect to any part of the Registration Statement, including this opinion as an exhibit or otherwise.


Yours faithfully




Maples and Calder (Hong Kong) LLP