Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to 240.14a-12 |
ABIOMED, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☒ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
(5) |
Total fee paid:
|
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
(3) |
Filing Party:
| |||
(4) |
Date Filed:
|
Table of Contents
22 Cherry Hill Drive
Danvers, Massachusetts 01923
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I cordially invite you to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ABIOMED, Inc. (“ABIOMED”), to be held at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, August 11, 2021, at the Beauport Hotel, located at 55 Commercial Street, Gloucester, Massachusetts 01930. The notice and proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting are attached to this letter and describe the business to be conducted at the 2021 Annual Meeting. | ||
In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about June 29, 2021 to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 14, 2021. We also provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet beginning on that date. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and did not receive, but would like to receive, a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. | ||
To have your vote recorded, you should vote over the Internet or by telephone. In addition, if you have requested or received a paper copy of the proxy materials, you may vote by signing, dating and returning the proxy card sent to you in the envelope accompanying the proxy materials (or voting instruction form, if you hold your shares through a broker bank or other nominee). We encourage you to vote by any of these methods even if you currently plan to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting. By doing so, you will ensure that your shares are represented and voted at the 2021 Annual Meeting. If you decide to attend, you can still vote your shares in person if you wish. |
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I thank you for your cooperation and look forward to seeing you on August 11, 2021.
Very truly yours,
Michael R. Minogue
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
June 29, 2021
Table of Contents
NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS OF ABIOMED, INC.
DATE AND TIME: | Wednesday, August 11, 2021 at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time | |
PLACE: | Beauport Hotel 55 Commercial Street Gloucester, Massachusetts 01930 | |
ITEMS OF BUSINESS: | 1) Elect the three Class II director nominees listed in the accompanying proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) to serve for a three-year term until the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;
2) Consider a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers;
3) Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022; and
4) Consider and act upon any matter which may properly come before the 2021 Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. | |
WHO CAN VOTE: | You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on Monday, June 14, 2021. | |
VOTING: | We urge you to participate in the meeting, either by attending and voting in person or by voting through another acceptable means as promptly as possible. You may vote by telephone, through the Internet or by mailing your completed and signed proxy card (or voting instruction form, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee). Each share is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Your vote is important and we urge you to vote. | |
2021 ANNUAL REPORT: | A copy of our annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 accompanies this Proxy Statement. |
June 29, 2021 | ||
Danvers, Massachusetts | By Order of the Board of Directors,
| |
Marc A. Began Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 11, 2021
This Notice of Annual Meeting and the accompanying Proxy Statement are being distributed or made available, as the case may be, on or about June 29, 2021, and the Proxy Statement and our annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 are available on our website at http://www.abiomed.com/events-presentations.
Table of Contents
1 | ||||
5 | ||||
5 |
Proposal No. 2 – Advisory Vote on Compensation of our Named Executive Officers | 12 | |||
Proposal No. 3 – Ratification of Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 13 | |||
14 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
17 | ||||
17 | ||||
21 | ||||
22 | ||||
24 | ||||
25 | ||||
25 | ||||
27 | ||||
27 | ||||
28 | ||||
28 | ||||
31 | ||||
32 | ||||
32 | ||||
32 | ||||
41 | ||||
43 | ||||
43 | ||||
47 | ||||
49 | ||||
50 | ||||
51 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
52 | ||||
53 | ||||
54 | ||||
55 | ||||
55 | ||||
59 | ||||
61 | ||||
62 | ||||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 63 | |||
65 | ||||
66 | ||||
67 | ||||
67 | ||||
67 | ||||
67 | ||||
67 | ||||
68 | ||||
Annual Report to Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K | 68 | |||
68 |
Table of Contents
Why am I being provided with these materials?
We are providing this proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) to you in connection with the solicitation by our board of directors (the “Board” or the “Board of Directors”) of proxies to be voted at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on August 11, 2021 (the “2021 Annual Meeting”), and at any postponements or adjournments of the 2021 Annual Meeting. We have either (i) delivered to you a notice of annual meeting (a “Notice”) and made this Proxy Statement and our annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 (the “Proxy Materials”) available to you on the Internet or (ii) delivered printed versions of these materials, including a proxy card, to you by mail.
How do I vote my shares without attending the 2021 Annual Meeting?
If you are a stockholder of record (meaning your shares of our common stock are registered directly with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, or “AST”), you may vote by granting a proxy. Specifically, you may vote:
• | by Internet—you may submit your proxy by going to www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on how to complete an electronic proxy card. You will need the 16-digit number included on your Notice or proxy card in order to vote by Internet. |
• | by Telephone—you may submit your proxy by using a touch-tone telephone to dial 1-800-690-6903 and following the recorded instructions. You will need the 16-digit number included on your Notice or proxy card in order to vote by telephone. |
• | by Mail—you may vote by mail by requesting a proxy card from us, indicating your vote by completing, signing and dating the card where indicated and by mailing or otherwise returning the card in the envelope that will be provided to you. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity, you must indicate your name and title or capacity. |
If you hold your shares in “street name” through a bank, broker or other nominee, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your broker or agent to obtain instructions on how to register for and be admitted to the 2021 Annual Meeting. In most instances, you will be able to do this on the Internet, by telephone or by mail as indicated above. Please refer to information from your bank, broker or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.
Who is entitled to vote?
Stockholders as of the close of business on June 14, 2021 (the “Record Date”) may vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting. You have one vote for each share of common stock held by you as of the Record Date, including shares:
• | held directly in your name as “stockholder of record” (also referred to as “registered stockholder”); and |
• | held for you in an account with a broker, bank or other nominee (shares held in “street name”)—street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and instead must instruct the broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote their shares. |
What constitutes a quorum?
A majority in interest of all stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at a meeting must be present or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and shares represented by “broker non-votes,” as described below, are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. On the Record Date, 45,344,956 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “common stock”) were outstanding, and each share of common stock is entitled to one vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting.
1
Table of Contents
What are the voting deadlines if I do not attend the 2021 Annual Meeting?
Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on August 10, 2021 for the voting of shares held by stockholders of record or held in street name.
Mailed proxy cards with respect to shares held of record or in street name must be received no later than August 10, 2021.
May I revoke my proxy or change my vote?
Yes. Whether you have voted by Internet, telephone or mail, if you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote by:
• | sending a written statement to that effect to the attention of our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at ABIOMED, Inc., 22 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, provided such statement is received no later than August 10, 2021; |
• | voting again by Internet or telephone at a later time before the closing of those voting facilities at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on August 10, 2021; |
• | submitting a properly signed proxy card with a later date that is received no later than August 10, 2021; or |
• | attending the 2021 Annual Meeting and revoking your proxy and voting in person. |
If you hold shares in street name, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your bank, broker or other nominee. You may also change your vote or revoke your proxy in person at the 2021 Annual Meeting if you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder (broker or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares in person.
What is a “broker non-vote” and how does it affect voting on each proposal?
A “broker non-vote” occurs if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker on a proposal and your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on such proposal. See below for a discussion of which proposals permit discretionary voting by brokers and the effect of a “broker non-vote.”
What if I receive more than one Notice or proxy card about the same time?
It generally means you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return each proxy card, or, if you vote by Internet or telephone, vote once for each Notice or proxy card you receive.
How do I vote my shares in person at the 2021 Annual Meeting?
First, as discussed below, you must satisfy the requirements for admission to the 2021 Annual Meeting. Then, if you are a stockholder of record and prefer to vote your shares at the 2021 Annual Meeting, you must bring proof of identification along with your Notice, proxy card or proof of ownership. You may vote shares held in street name at the 2021 Annual Meeting only if you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder (bank, broker or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares in person.
What do I need to be admitted to the 2021 Annual Meeting?
The health and safety of our employees, directors, stockholders and other stakeholders are of utmost importance. We are sensitive to the public health concerns that our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state and local governments may impose. In light of the ongoing coronavirus, or COVID-19, outbreak, you will be able to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting in person if you present no symptoms and follow appropriate social distancing restrictions at the meeting.
Additionally, for admission to the 2021 Annual Meeting, you will need a form of valid government-issued personal identification (such as a driver’s license) along with either your Notice, proxy card or proof of stock ownership
2
Table of Contents
as of the Record Date to enter the 2021 Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee and you wish to be admitted to the 2021 Annual Meeting, you must present proof of your ownership of our common stock as of the Record Date, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, a copy of the voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank or other nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. If you are a representative or proxyholder of an entity that owns our common stock, you must present evidence that you are the entity’s authorized representative or proxyholder, and, if the entity is a street name owner, proof of the entity’s beneficial ownership as of the Record Date.
Are there other things I should know if I intend to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting?
Please note that no cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the 2021 Annual Meeting. Attendees may be subject to security inspections and other security precautions. We reserve the right to limit the number of representatives who may attend the meeting.
Who will count the vote?
Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will tabulate the votes and act as inspector of elections.
Could other matters be decided at the 2021 Annual Meeting?
At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any matters to be raised at the 2021 Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement, and the deadline for submitting proposals under our by-laws has passed. If other matters are properly presented at the 2021 Annual Meeting for consideration and you are a stockholder of record and have submitted a proxy card, the persons named in your proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.
Who will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation?
We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. Some of our officers and employees may solicit proxies by correspondence, telephone or in person, without extra compensation. We may also pay to banks, brokers, nominees and other fiduciaries their reasonable charges and expenses incurred in forwarding proxy materials to their principals. In addition, we have hired Morrow Sodali LLC, 470 West Ave, Stamford, Connecticut 06902 to solicit proxies. We expect to pay Morrow Sodali LLC, 470 West Ave, Stamford, Connecticut 06902 a fee of $7,500 plus reasonable expenses for these services.
What am I voting on, how many votes are required to approve each proposal, how are votes counted and how does the Board recommend I vote?
The table below summarizes the proposals that will be voted on, the vote required to approve each item, how votes are counted and how the Board recommends you vote.
Proposal | Vote Required | Voting Options | Board Recommendation(2) | Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed(3) | Impact Abstain Vote | |||||
Proposal No. 1 - Election of the three Class II director nominees listed in | Plurality of votes cast, with director resignation policy.(1) | “FOR” “WITHHOLD” | “FOR” | No | N/A | |||||
“FOR” | “FOR” | No | None | |||||||
Proposal No. 2 - Non-binding, compensation of our named executive officers | Majority of votes cast | “AGAINST” “ABSTAIN” | ||||||||
Proposal No. 3 - Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022
| Majority of votes cast
| “FOR”
| “FOR”
| Yes
| None
|
(1) | We have adopted a director resignation policy that applies in uncontested elections of directors. This means that the plurality standard will determine whether a director nominee is elected, but our resignation policy will require that the number of votes cast “for” a director must |
3
Table of Contents
exceed the number of votes “withheld” from the director, or the director must submit his or her resignation. The Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Governance and Nominating Committee”) would then consider whether to recommend that the Board of Directors accept or reject the resignation. See “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Director Resignation Policy” below for additional details. |
(2) | If you are a registered holder and you sign and submit your proxy card without indicating your voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendation. |
(3) | A broker non-vote will not count as a vote “for” or “against” a director and will have no effect on the outcome of the election of the three director nominees disclosed in Proposal No. 1 or on the outcome of Proposal No. 2. If a majority of the voting power of the minimum number of shares entitled to vote that would constitute a quorum at the 2021 Annual Meeting is required in order to approve the proposal as described in the column “Vote Required” above, then a broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote “against” Proposal No. 3. |
What will be the result if I submit my proxy card without making specific instructions?
If you properly submit your proxy card without making specific instructions, your shares will be voted in the manner recommended by our Board of Directors as follows: “for” each of the three Class II director nominees (Proposal No. 1); “for” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 2); and “for” the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal No. 3). If any other matters not included in this Proxy Statement properly come before the meeting, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted by the holders of the proxies in accordance with their best judgment to the extent permitted by Rule 14a-4(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The proxy may be removed at any time prior to exercise by the means discussed under “—May I revoke my proxy or change my vote?”
Is there a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting?
The names of stockholders entitled to vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting will be available at the 2021 Annual Meeting and for 10 days prior to the 2021 Annual Meeting for any purpose germane to the 2021 Annual Meeting, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. (Eastern Time), at our principal executive offices at 22 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, by contacting Marc A. Began, our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
4
Table of Contents
|
Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors
Our Board of Directors currently consists of nine directors and is divided into three classes. We refer to these classes as Class I, Class II and Class III. The term of a class of directors expires each year at the annual meeting of stockholders. Each director continues to serve as a director until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier removal, death or resignation. This year, the terms of the Class II directors, Eric A. Rose, Jeannine M. Rivet and Myron L. Rolle, expire at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Michael R. Minogue, Martin P. Sutter and Paula A. Johnson currently serve as Class III directors, with their terms of office expiring at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and Dorothy E. Puhy, Paul G. Thomas and Christopher D. Van Gorder currently serve as Class I directors, with their terms of office expiring at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Our Board of Directors has nominated each of Eric A. Rose, Jeannine M. Rivet and Myron L. Rolle to serve as a Class II director for a three-year term until the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier removal, death or resignation. If any nominee at the time of the 2021 Annual Meeting is unable or unwilling to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, and our Board of Directors designates another nominee, the persons named as proxies will vote the proxy for such substitute nominee. Our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any substitute nominee or nominees will be required, and all of the nominees have indicated that they will be willing and able to serve as directors and to serve if elected. The nominees are not being nominated pursuant to any arrangement or understanding with any person.
The following information describes the offices held and other business directorships of each nominee for election at the 2021 Annual Meeting and each director continuing in office beyond the 2021 Annual Meeting. Ages set forth below are as of June 14, 2021. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of the nominees and other directors is described in “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”
5
Table of Contents
Class II – Nominees for Term Expiring This Year
The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board believe that each of the nominees for election at the 2021 Annual Meeting possesses a strong and unique set of attributes. The particular experience, qualifications or skills of each nominee that the Governance and Nominating Committee believes will advance the Company’s goals are included in the individual biographies below. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board believe that, as a group, these nominees provide the Board with an optimal balance of experience, leadership, competencies, qualifications and skills.
Director Since: 2014 (formerly a director from 2007 – 2012)
Board Committees: • Audit
Age: 70 |
ERIC A. ROSE, MD
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional Experience:
Former Non-Executive Chairman, SIGA Technologies, Inc. Dr. Rose served as Chairman of SIGA Technologies, Inc. (“SIGA”), a developer of antiviral drugs directed at potential agents of bioterror, from 2013 until June 2021. SIGA successfully developed a cure for smallpox, which is now in the strategic national stockpile of the United States government. The company has received more than $600 million in contract revenue and research support from the United States Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. The company filed voluntary proceedings under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in September 2014 and exited from bankruptcy protection in April 2016. Dr. Rose served from 2007 to 2016 as Executive Vice President for Life Sciences at MacAndrews & Forbes and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of SIGA. Dr. Rose chaired the Department of Health Evidence & Policy at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine from 2008 to 2013, where he now serves as professor. From 1994 to 2007, he was Surgeon-in-Chief at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia and Chairman of the Department of Surgery at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. A heart surgeon, researcher and entrepreneur, Dr. Rose helped grow Columbia’s Department of Surgery over 25 years while investigating, managing and developing complex medical technologies. He has authored or co-authored more than 300 scientific publications and has received more than $25 million in NIH support for his research. Dr. Rose pioneered heart transplantation in children, performing the first successful pediatric heart transplant in 1984, and has investigated many alternatives to heart transplantation, including cross-species transplantation and man-made heart pumps. He received both his undergraduate and medical degrees from Columbia University.
Other Public Company Directorships: Mesoblast Ltd.
Other Current Non-Public Company Directorship: Member of the board of directors of Orchestra Biomed.
Past Public Company Directorships: SIGA.
Director Qualifications: We believe that Dr. Rose’s distinguished work as a heart surgeon and researcher, his work as an entrepreneur in our industry and his executive level industry experience qualify him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
6
Table of Contents
Director Since: 2016
Board Committees: • Compensation • Audit
Age: 73 |
JEANNINE M. RIVET
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional Experience:
Former Executive Vice President, UnitedHealth Group. Ms. Rivet served as Executive Vice President of UnitedHealth Group from 2001 until her retirement in 2018. Previously, she served as Chief Executive Officer of UnitedHealthcare from 1998 to 2001, Chief Executive Officer of Ingenix from 2001 to 2003 and Chief Executive Officer of Optum from December 2003 to 2005. Ms. Rivet received her Bachelor of Science in Nursing from Boston College and her Master’s Degree in Public Health from Boston University. She also worked as a registered nurse for several years prior to entering the managed care business.
Other Current and Past Non-Public Company Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships: Board member of Ōmcare Inc., a healthcare technology solutions company. Formerly an advisory board member of Solutran, Inc., a customized treasury management company, and formerly on the board of directors of Schwan Food Company.
Director Qualifications: We believe that Ms. Rivet’s extensive knowledge of the managed care business, her direct healthcare experience, her executive-level experience and her management abilities and experience qualify her to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
Director Since: 2021
Board Committees: • Governance and Nomination • Risk and Compliance
Age: 34 |
MYRON L. ROLLE, MD
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional Experience:
Global Neurosurgery Fellow and Resident, Massachusetts General Hospital. Dr. Rolle has served as a Global Neurosurgery Fellow and Neurosurgery Resident at Massachusetts General Hospital since 2017. As a neurosurgeon, Dr. Rolle has been recognized by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons for demonstrating the best operative technique in the reconstruction of upper extremity motor function using intercostal nerve transfers after a traumatic brachial plexus injury. He is the developer of the Rolle Scoring System, a public health rating scale used to determine a developing country’s governance around helmet safety to prevent traumatic brain injury. Dr. Rolle is a former professional football player, who played in the National Football League for the Tennessee Titans and Pittsburgh Steelers between 2010 and 2012. He holds a Bachelor of Science in exercise science from Florida State University, a Doctor of Medicine from Florida State University College of Medicine and a Master of Science in medical anthropology from the University of Oxford.
Other Current Non-Public Company Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships: Chairman of the Myron L. Rolle Foundation; founder of the CARICOM Neurological Service Initiative.
Director Qualifications: We believe that Dr. Rolle’s broad mix of skills and experiences as a neurosurgeon, former professional athlete and innovative medical researcher provide unique perspectives on the role of medical technology in improving patient outcomes and qualify him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors. Additionally, as a first-time director of a public company, Dr. Rolle brings a fresh perspective to our Board and on the Company’s capacity for growth. Dr. Rolle was recommended as a director candidate by our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
|
7
Table of Contents
Continuing Members of the Board of Directors
The directors whose biographies are below will continue in office beyond the term of the 2021 Annual Meeting.
Class III – Directors Whose Term Expires in 2022
Director Since: 2004
Age: 54 |
MICHAEL R. MINOGUE
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation, Professional Experience, Other Non-Public Company Directorships and Other Information:
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, ABIOMED. Mr. Michael R. Minogue has been Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ABIOMED (NASDAQ: ABMD) since 2004. Mr. Minogue transitioned the Company’s mission to creating the field of heart and lung recovery with the acquisition and development of technologies such as Impella®, the world’s smallest heart pump, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (“ECMO”). ABIOMED has been one of the fastest growing, GAAP profitable MedTech companies and ranked the third best performing stock on the S&P 500 for the last decade. ABIOMED has earned numerous global regulatory approvals on products and indications in the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries. ABIOMED employs approximately 1,700 people with facilities in Danvers, Massachusetts, Aachen and Berlin, Germany, Baltimore, Maryland, and Tokyo, Japan.
In addition to his responsibilities at ABIOMED, Mr. Minogue currently serves as Chairman of the medical device industry association board of directors for AdvaMed and serves on the board for the Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC). He also serves on Insulet Corporation’s Board of Directors and was on the boards of LifeCell and Bioventus.
Before joining ABIOMED, Mr. Minogue spent 11 years with General Electric Healthcare, where he held numerous leadership positions and holds three patents. Mr. Minogue also served as an officer in the U.S. Army, which included multiple distinctions including Airborne, Ranger, Desert Storm Veteran and Bronze Star. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering Management from the United States Military Academy at West Point and his Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago.
Mr. Minogue co-founded the Mike and Renee Minogue Foundation and the Mentoring Veterans Program (MVPvets) (www.mvpvets.org), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that helps military veterans network with industry mentors to discover career opportunities in the MedTech industry. He serves on the Board of Directors after serving as the Chairman for the past eight years. Mr. Minogue is the Chairman of the Governor’s Advisory Council on Veterans’ Services for Massachusetts and supports the Inner-City Scholarship Fund, Boys and Girls Club, and multiple educational initiatives. Mr. Minogue is married with five children and enjoys reading, mentoring, running, coaching, skiing and playing sports.
Director Qualifications: We believe that Mr. Minogue’s extensive knowledge as an executive of the Company, former executive leadership experience in the healthcare industry, as well as his experience as a board member of medical device and technology companies, qualifies him to lead our management team and serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
8
Table of Contents
Director Since: 2008
Board Committees: • Compensation • Governance and Nominating (Chair)
Age: 66 |
MARTIN P. SUTTER
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional Experience:
Co-Founder and a Managing Director, EW Healthcare Partners. Since 1985, Mr. Sutter has been the Co-Founder and a Managing Director of EW Healthcare Partners, previously known as Essex Woodlands Health Ventures, a healthcare-focused growth equity firm. Educated in chemical engineering and finance, Mr. Sutter has more than 40 years of management experience in operations, marketing, finance and venture capital. Mr. Sutter holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Louisiana State University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Houston.
Other Current and Past Company Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships: Board of Directors of Bioventus, Inc., a publicly held orthobiologics company focused on active healing therapies, bio surgical products and sports medicine; Board of Directors of Prolacta Bioscience, Inc., a privately held company which provides human milk-based nutritional products for critically ill, premature infants in neonatal intensive care units; and board of directors of MiMedx Group Inc., a publicly held regenerative medicine company with a specialized focus on tissue from amniotic membrane and umbilical cord, with wide ranging clinical applications across wound care and musculoskeletal impairments. Formerly on the Boards of Directors of the following EW Healthcare Partners’ portfolio investments: ATS Medical (later acquired by Medtronic, Inc.); BioForm Medical (later acquired by Merz GmbH & Co KGaA); LifeCell (later acquired by Kinetic Concepts); St. Francis Medical (later acquired by Kyphon, Inc./Medtronic, Inc.); Confluent Surgical (later acquired by Tyco International/Covidien); and Rinat Neurosciences (later acquired by Pfizer, Inc.). Mr. Sutter is also a former Trustee of the Culinary Institute of America.
Director Qualifications: We believe that Mr. Sutter’s in-depth knowledge of the medical device industry, his skills as an investor in developing medical device companies, his extensive board experience and his position as a representative of a large stockholder in our Company qualify him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors. |
9
Table of Contents
Director Since: 2021
Board Committees: • Governance and Nominating
Age: 61 |
PAULA A. JOHNSON, MD, MPH
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional Experience:
Cardiologist; President of Wellesley College. Dr. Johnson has served as the president of Wellesley College since 2016. She is a physician-researcher specializing in cardiology who founded and served as the inaugural Executive Director of the Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital from July 2002 to June 2016. Dr. Johnson served as the Chief of the Division of Women’s Health at Brigham and Women’s Hospital from July 2002 to June 2016. She was also a Professor of Medicine at the Harvard Medical School and Professor of Epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health. She holds a Bachelor of Arts, Doctor of Medicine and Masters in Public Health from Harvard University, and trained in internal medicine and cardiovascular medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Past Public Company Directorships: West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and Eaton Vance Corp.
Current Non-Public Company Directorship: Director of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum since 2015.
Director Qualifications: We believe that Dr. Johnson’s expertise in healthcare and health policy, as well as her experience and perspective as a cardiologist and medical researcher, qualify her to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
Class I Directors Whose Term Expires in 2023
Director Since: 2003 • Lead Director (since 2005)
Board Committees: • Audit (Chair) • Risk and Compliance
Age: 69 |
DOROTHY E. PUHY
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional Experience:
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Ms. Puhy served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2012 until her retirement in March 2019. Ms. Puhy previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 1994 to 2012 and as its Assistant Treasurer from 1995 to 2012. From 1985 to 1994, Ms. Puhy held various financial positions at the New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc., including Chief Financial Officer from 1989 to 1994. Ms. Puhy received her Bachelor of Arts from the University of Pennsylvania and her Master of Business Administration from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
Past Public Company Directorship: Eaton Vance Corp. (from April 2006 until its acquisition in March 2021).
Other Current and Past Non-Public Company Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships: Chairwoman of the board of directors of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and member of the boards of directors of CRICO (a captive professional and general liability insurance company). Formerly on the board of directors of United Way of Massachusetts Bay and Merrimack Valley (from 2015 through June 2020).
Director Qualifications: We believe that Ms. Puhy’s financial acumen, her executive level experience at a major medical research institute and her extensive industry knowledge qualify her to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
10
Table of Contents
Director Since: 2011
Board Committees: • Compensation (Chair) • Risk and Compliance
Age: 65 |
PAUL G. THOMAS
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation, Professional Experience, Other Non-Public Company Directorships and Other Information:
Chief Executive Officer and Founder, Prominex, Inc. In January 2018, Mr. Thomas co-founded Prominex, Inc., a start-up company focused on the development of molecular diagnostic assays for point-of-care infectious disease testing. Mr. Thomas currently serves as Prominex’s Chief Executive Officer. Prior to his employment with Prominex, Mr. Thomas served as the founder, President, Chief Executive Officer and director of Roka Bioscience, Inc. from September 2009 until his retirement in January 2017. Previously, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of LifeCell from October 1998 until its acquisition by Kinetic Concepts. Prior to joining LifeCell, Mr. Thomas held various senior positions, including President of the Pharmaceuticals division, during a 15-year tenure with Ohmeda Inc. Mr. Thomas received his Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from St. Michael’s College and his Master of Business Administration from Columbia University, and completed his postgraduate studies in chemistry at the University of Georgia.
Other Current Public Company Directorships: Surgalign Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as RTI Surgical Holdings, Inc.) and Axogen, Inc.
Past Public Company Directorships: Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Director Qualifications: We believe that Mr. Thomas’ extensive leadership experience with companies in the life sciences industry qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
Director Since: 2016
Board Committees: • Governance and Nominating • Risk and Compliance (Chair)
Age: 68 |
CHRISTOPHER D. VAN GORDER, FACHE
| |||
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional Experience:
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Scripps Health. Since December 1999, Mr. Van Gorder has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Scripps Health, where he oversees all functions of the integrated health system. Mr. Van Gorder currently is a clinical professor of health practice at the University of Southern California Price School of Public Policy, where he also serves on the board of councilors. Mr. Van Gorder received his undergraduate degree from California State University, Los Angeles, and his master’s degree in public administration/health services administration from the University of Southern California. He has also completed the Chief Executive Officer Program at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
Other Current and Past Non-Public Company Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships: Formerly served as Chairman of the Board of Governors for the American College of Healthcare Executives, and formerly on the boards of directors of Z-Medica, LLC and the California Hospital Association.
Director Qualifications: We believe that Mr. Van Gorder’s experience as a business leader, his expertise in the healthcare field and his executive level industry experience qualify him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of Dr. Rose, Ms. Rivet and Dr. Rolle.
11
Table of Contents
Proposal No. 2 – Advisory Vote on Compensation of our Named Executive Officers
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and related SEC rules, we are required to provide our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our “named executive officers” as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosures from page 32 to page 61. We refer to this non-binding advisory vote as the “say-on-pay” vote. Although this vote is not binding on us, we value the opinion of our stockholders. Our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) will carefully consider the outcome of the vote as we make future decisions on executive compensation.
As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” by offering compensation that is competitive with peer organizations, our compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate our executive officers and to reward superior financial, strategic and operational performance in a manner consistent with our team-oriented values and corporate goals. Our compensation consists of a mixture of cash payments and equity incentives, which we believe aligns our executive compensation with the interests of our stockholders. We review our compensation policies annually with the help of Willis Towers Watson, a compensation consultant, to understand how our policies compare to market practices and to ensure our compensation policies create the right incentives to attract, retain and motivate our workforce. We encourage you to carefully review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a discussion of the factors underlying the structure of our executive compensation program.
We are asking you to indicate your support for the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2021 as described in this Proxy Statement. The vote on this proposal is not intended to address any specific element of compensation but rather relates to the overall compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K (including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosures). Thus, we ask our stockholders to vote in favor of the following resolution at the 2021 Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the Stockholders of ABIOMED, Inc. APPROVE, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the ‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis,’ the compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosures.”
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.
12
Table of Contents
Proposal No. 3 – Ratification of Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the “Nasdaq Stock Market”), the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is the direct responsibility of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”). Although ratification by our stockholders of this appointment is not required by law, our Board of Directors believes that seeking stockholder ratification is a good practice, which provides stockholders an avenue to express their views on this important matter.
Our Audit Committee, composed solely of independent directors, has reappointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote to ratify the appointment. If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee may reconsider its decision. Additionally, even if stockholders ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, appoint a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it believes that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. For information on the fees paid by us to Deloitte & Touche LLP in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 (“Fiscal 2020”) and fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 (“Fiscal 2021”), see “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees.”
We expect that representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will attend the 2021 Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders who attend the 2021 Annual Meeting.
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment by our Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022.
13
Table of Contents
|
Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers. Our executive officers who are not also directors, as well as certain officers, are listed below. For information on Mr. Minogue, see “Continuing Members of the Board of Directors” under Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors. Ages set forth below are as of June 14, 2021.
TODD A. TRAPP
| ||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Age: 50
|
Principal Occupation and Other Information
Mr. Trapp was appointed as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on April 9, 2018. He currently oversees the Finance, IT and Human Resources functions. He joined us from Watts Water Technologies, Inc., a $1.5 billion global manufacturing leader of innovative products to control the efficiency, safety and quality of water within residential and commercial applications, where he served as Chief Financial Officer from April 2015 to March 2018. Prior to joining Watts Water Technologies, Mr. Trapp spent 13 years in a variety of financial and operational roles at Honeywell International Inc., a $35 billion diversified technology and manufacturing company. At Honeywell, Mr. Trapp served as Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis, Chief Financial Officer of the Airlines Business Unit, Director of Finance for the Transportation Systems Business Division, Investor Relations Manager and other senior finance positions. Prior to joining Honeywell, Mr. Trapp held several treasury and finance operational roles at United Business Media, Inc. and Pearson, Inc. Mr. Trapp holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Providence College and a Master of Business Administration in Finance from Northeastern University.
| |
DAVID M. WEBER, PhD
| ||
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Age: 59
|
Principal Occupation and Other Information
Dr. Weber joined us in April 2007 as our Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, later becoming our Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining us, Dr. Weber served as General Manager, Aviation Business at GE Security - Homeland Protection from April 2005 until April 2007 where he led GE Security’s Aviation and Transportation Business and was responsible for product development, marketing and sales. From June 2004 until April 2005, he served as General Manager, MRI Marketing at General Electric Healthcare where he was responsible for strategic product planning, go-to-market and product launch activities, including developing product roadmaps and introducing new product technologies to the market, and from March 2001 until June 2004, he served as Manager, Global High Field MRI Business, GE Medical Systems where he was responsible for new product planning and development. Dr. Weber received his Bachelor of Science in Physics from Denison University, his Bachelor of Science in Nuclear Engineering from Columbia University, his Master of Science as well as a Doctor of Philosophy, in Medical Physics from the University of Wisconsin - Madison.
|
14
Table of Contents
ANDREW J. GREENFIELD
| ||
Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer
Age: 48
|
Principal Occupation and Other Information
Mr. Greenfield was appointed as our Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer in April of 2020. He joined us in 2005 and prior to this recent appointment, served as Vice President and General Manager, Global Marketing. In addition to overseeing our global commercial operations, Mr. Greenfield oversees government affairs, reimbursement, global marketing, Asia Pacific and physician programs. Before joining us, Mr. Greenfield held positions in sales, marketing and finance at GE Healthcare including consulting with large U.S. health systems, eCommerce and Six Sigma from 1999 to 2005. Prior to GE Healthcare, he held positions in sales, marketing and finance at The Boeing Company, including European Country Manager, and is a graduate of the Fiscal Development Program.
Mr. Greenfield is currently chairman-elect and an executive committee member for MassMEDIC in Boston, Massachusetts, a public-private partnership that coordinates the resources used in managing medical devices to improve patient access to cutting-edge medical technology. He is a past executive committee member of the Medical Device Innovation Consortium which aims to advance safer and more cost-effective innovations that benefit patients through a collaboration between the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), industry and patients.
Mr. Greenfield received his Bachelor’s degree in Finance from the University of Illinois and Master of Business Administration degree from St. Louis University. He is also a certified Master Blackbelt in Six Sigma and Change Acceleration Process from GE Healthcare.
| |
MARC A. BEGAN
| ||
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Age: 54
|
Principal Occupation and Other Information
Mr. Began joined us in June 2018 and serves as our Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary and is responsible for leading the Company’s legal, compliance and business development functions. Mr. Began joined us from Boehringer Ingelheim where he was Vice President of intellectual property, responsible for medical device, pharmaceutical, and biologic intellectual property issues. Before joining Boehringer Ingelheim, Mr. Began held various positions of increasing responsibility at Novo Nordisk during a 15-year period. Before joining Novo Nordisk, Mr. Began was an associate at the law firms of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and White & Case LLP in New York, where he handled a broad range of legal matters, including litigation, intellectual property, corporate transactions, regulatory and compliance. Mr. Began earned a Juris Doctor degree from Albany Law School at Union University and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. | |
15
Table of Contents
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS
|
Corporate Governance Highlights
Our Board of Directors oversees the management of our business and affairs, and conducts its business through meetings of the Board of Directors and four standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Governance and Nominating and Risk and Compliance. In addition, from time to time, special committees may be established under the direction of the Board of Directors when necessary to address specific issues. The following shows an overview of the composition of our Board, as further detailed in the below sections of this Proxy Statement.
Our commitment to good corporate governance is also reflected in the following additional traits and practices of our Board of Directors and committees, as further detailed in the below sections of this Proxy Statement.
BOARD COMPOSITION AND ACCOUNTABILITY
Committee independence |
All committees are made up of independent directors.
| |
Executive sessions |
Independent members of the Board and each of the committees are expected to meet regularly in executive session with no members of management present.
| |
Board evaluation |
Each of the Board and its committees evaluates and discusses its respective performance and effectiveness annually.
| |
Engagement with stockholders |
The Board and management value the perspectives of our stockholders and work to provide our stockholders with continuous and meaningful engagement.
| |
Risk oversight |
The Board and committees annually review their oversight of risk and the allocation of risk oversight among the committees.
| |
ESG oversight |
The Board and management, in conjunction with our Governance and Nominating Committee, have oversight responsibility of our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) strategy.
|
16
Table of Contents
BOARD COMPENSATION
Time-vesting restricted stock units (“RSUs”) |
Each of our non-employee directors currently receives more than 50% of his or her annual compensation from us in the form of RSUs (based on the grant date fair value of $200,000 annual grants).
| |
Director stock ownership guidelines |
Each of our directors is required to beneficially own shares of our common stock with the equivalent value, as of the acquisition date, of at least five times his or her aggregate annual cash retainer, by the date of the fifth anniversary of his or her appointment. | |
Compensation review |
The Compensation Committee reviews the appropriateness of our director compensation.
|
Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that, other than Mr. Minogue, who is our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, none of our directors or director nominees has a material relationship with us, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization with a relationship with us. Therefore, under the applicable rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, all of the members of our Board, other than Mr. Minogue, are “independent directors.” Additionally, each member of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Governance and Nominating Committee and Risk and Compliance Committee is an “independent director” under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market applicable to such committees. In connection with its independence determination, the Board of Directors specifically considered the following:
Director | Relationship
| |
Christopher D. Van Gorder, FACHE |
Mr. Van Gorder is Chief Executive Officer of Scripps Health, which purchases our products and services. We recognized $2.0 million in revenues from Scripps Health during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, which represented less than 1% of our revenues for such year. We expect Scripps Health will continue to purchase our products in the future. The Board did not consider these amounts as impairing Mr. Van Gorder’s independence, insofar as they represented less than 1% of our total revenues in fiscal 2021, and we do not depend on Scripps Health for any significant aspect of our business.
|
How We Select Our Leadership Structure
The Board believes that “one size” does not fit all, and thus does not have a formal policy regarding whether the same person should serve as both the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. One leadership structure is not more effective at creating long-term stockholder value, and the decision of whether to combine or separate the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman should vary company to company, depending upon a company’s particular circumstances at a given point in time. Specifically, an effective governance structure must balance the powers of the Chief Executive Officer and the independent directors and ensure that the independent directors are fully informed, ready to discuss and debate the issues that they deem important, and are able to provide effective oversight of management. Our Board of Directors also believes that it should retain the flexibility to make this determination in the manner it feels will provide the most appropriate leadership for the Company from time to time. Our Chairman is appointed annually by the Board.
17
Table of Contents
Our Current Board Leadership Structure
Michael R. Minogue Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | Mr. Minogue serves as Chairman of our Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer and has held such positions for the past 16 years. The combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in the case of the Company, means that the Chairman of the Board has longstanding experience in our industry and ongoing executive responsibility with the Company. This experience enables the Board to understand the Company better and work with management to enhance stockholder value. In addition, the Board believes that this structure allows it to fulfill more effectively its risk oversight responsibilities and enhances the ability of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer to communicate effectively the view of the Board to management.
| |
Dorothy E. Puhy Lead Director |
In October 2005, our Board designated Dorothy E. Puhy as its Lead Director. The position of Lead Director is to be held by one of our independent directors and has responsibilities beyond those of the other directors, including but not limited to:
• Board leadership — organizing and chairing executive sessions of independent directors;
• Chief Executive Officer compensation — working with the Compensation Committee to set performance goals for our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and to evaluate his performance for the prior year;
• Chairman-independent director liaison — acting as a liaison between the Chairman and the Board of Directors; and
• Chief Executive Officer succession planning — leading an annual discussion of succession planning with the Chief Executive Officer and our chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee.
|
The Board believes that the responsibilities of the Lead Director help to ensure appropriate oversight of the Company’s management by the Board and optimal functioning of the Board. The effectiveness of the Lead Director is enhanced by the Board’s independent character, as discussed above under “Director Independence.”
Director Selection and Qualifications
The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for recommending director candidates for election at stockholder meetings, including incumbent directors and newly appointed directors, and for reviewing the full composition of the Board and its committees on an annual basis, including directors not up for re-election.
Director Selection Process
When determining whether the Board’s incumbent director nominees and directors not up for re-election possess the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Governance and Nominating Committee and Board focus on the results of the annual Board and committee evaluations and the information discussed in each of the Board members’ or nominees’ biographies. For more information, see “Board and Committee Evaluations” below. In addition, the Governance and Nominating Committee and Board of Directors consider these directors’ valuable contributions to the Company’s success during their years of Board service.
As part of its recurring activities, including where there are vacancies on our Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee and Board also seek to identify qualified new candidates to sit on the Board. To identify and recruit qualified candidates for the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee has previously utilized the services of professional search firms and/or sought referrals from other members of the Board, management, stockholders and other sources. After conducting an initial evaluation of a candidate, one or more members of the Governance and
18
Table of Contents
Nominating Committee will interview that candidate if the committee believes the candidate might be suitable to be a director and may ask the candidate to meet with other directors and management. If the Governance and Nominating Committee believes a candidate would be a valuable addition to the Board, it will recommend to the full Board of Directors that candidate’s election. For details on the qualifications considered by the Governance and Nominating Committee in evaluating incumbent director nominees, new directors and directors not up for re-election, see “Director Qualifications” below.
Director Qualifications
While the Governance and Nominating Committee lacks specific, delineated qualifications for the nomination of director candidates and the evaluation of directors not up for re-election, the committee reviews a number of factors, qualifications and skills it deems appropriate.
• | Demonstrated integrity and achievement: Candidates for membership to our Board, as well as directors sitting on our Board not up for re-election, should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, mature judgment and integrity, the ability to work collegially with the other Board members and demonstrated professional achievement and leadership capabilities. |
• | Time and availability: All candidates, as well as directors not up for re-election, must evidence a commitment to devote the substantial time and energy required of productive Board members. |
• | Diversity and effective mix of tenures: Ensuring the Board is composed of directors who bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives to our Board, such as skills, professional experience and backgrounds, and who can effectively represent the long-term interests of stockholders, remains a priority of the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board. |
The Board believes that its record on Board tenure and diversity in various forms reflect this focus on effective Board composition.
Board Tenure
When recommending to the Board the slate of director nominees for election at an annual meeting of stockholders and reviewing directors not up for re-election, the Governance and Nominating Committee strives to maintain a healthy degree of board refreshment and prevent excessive entrenchment, while weighing the strong contributions delivered by directors with deep knowledge of our Company’s history and strategic long-term goals. As shown below, the Board’s balanced approach to refreshment has resulted in an appropriate mix of long-serving and newer directors. Since 2016, four new directors have joined our Board, including one director who joined in fiscal 2021 and another at the start of fiscal 2022. |
19
Table of Contents
Diversity
The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board seek candidates with a broad diversity of knowledge, experience and demonstrated expertise in areas of importance to our Company, such as management, healthcare, finance, marketing, technology, medical technology, cardiac research, human resources, public policy and law. Key areas identified by the Governance and Nominating Committee include the following, among others:
In considering each director nominee and our incumbent directors not up for re-election, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board evaluated such person’s key qualifications, skills, experience and perspectives that he or she could bring to the Board, including in light of the particular areas summarized in the matrix below. The fact that a particular qualification, skill, experience or perspective is not listed below does not mean that the nominee does not possess it or that the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board did not evaluate it.
OUTSIDE PUBLIC BOARD LEADERSHIP | SENIOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP | HEALTHCARE OR LIFE SCIENCES INDUSTRY | SCIENTIFIC OR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY EXPERTISE | MEDICAL DEVICE COMPANY OPERATIONS | DIRECT PATIENT CARE | |||||||
Michael R. Minogue | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
Dorothy E. Puhy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
Jeannine M. Rivet | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
Eric A. Rose | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
Martin P. Sutter | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
Paul G. Thomas | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
Christopher D. Van Gorder | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||
Myron L. Rolle | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
Paula A. Johnson | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
20
Table of Contents
The Governance and Nominating Committee also considers traditional diversity factors such as race and gender. Although it has no formal policy, guidelines or procedures with respect to consideration of diversity in the nominating process, the Governance and Nominating Committee makes recommendations to the Board to ensure it is composed of directors with sufficiently diverse and independent backgrounds. The tables below provide additional information regarding our directors’ self-identified gender and race/ethnicity.
Stockholder Proposals of Candidates for Membership to Our Board of Directors
Our Governance and Nominating Committee will review all candidates for director in the same manner, regardless of the source of the recommendation. Candidates recommended by our stockholders will be considered in accordance with the requirements for such recommendations. See “Stockholder Proposals for 2022” below for additional details.
Expectations for Members of our Board of Directors
Service on Other Boards
The Company values the experience that our directors bring from other boards on which they serve, but recognizes that those boards may also present demands on a director’s time and availability and may present conflicts or legal issues. Thus, we have adopted a policy stating that no director of this Company may simultaneously serve as a director of more than four public companies (including the Company), and that any director who is a named executive officer of a public company may not serve simultaneously as a director of more than two public companies (including the Company). Additionally, no member of the Board of Directors may become a director on any other public company board without discussing it with the Chairman of the Board of Directors and receiving the prior approval of the Governance and Nominating Committee.
Under this policy, no member of the Board of Directors may (i) become a member of the board of any private or non-profit company with which the Company has any substantial relationship or (ii) accept any affiliation with any other business or governmental unit with which the Company has any substantial relationship, in the case of either clause (i) or clause (ii), without discussing it with the Chairman of the Board of Directors and receiving the prior approval of the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee or the subsequent ratification of the Governance and Nominating Committee.
Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
It is our policy that, to the extent reasonably practicable, directors should attend our annual meetings of stockholders. All of our directors who were serving on our Board at the time of our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended that meeting.
21
Table of Contents
Attendance at Board and Committee Meetings
The Board takes seriously the attendance of directors at meetings of the Board and committees of which they are members. Directors are expected to attend Board and committee meetings on which they serve, and to meet as frequently as necessary in order to properly discharge their responsibilities. The Board also expects that directors will dedicate sufficient time and attention to ensure diligent performance of their duties and will interact with each other in real-time to encourage open and inspired discussion. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, our Board of Directors held six meetings. Additionally, in accordance with the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, our independent directors are expected to meet without management present at least twice per year. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the independent directors held two meetings without management present.
Each director attended at least 75% of the combined number of meetings of the Board of Directors, including, as applicable, meetings of the independent directors and meetings of committees on which he or she served, during the period in fiscal 2021 in which he or she served as a director or member of such committee, as applicable.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board has established various committees to assist it with the performance of its responsibilities. The Board designates the members of these committees and the committee chairs based on the recommendations of the Governance and Nominating Committee. The chair of each committee develops the agenda for its committee meetings and each committee regularly provides a full report to the Board.
The following table identifies the current members of our Board serving on each of the committees of the Board.
DIRECTOR | INDEPENDENT | AUDIT COMMITTEE(1) | COMPENSATION COMMITTEE(2) | GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE | RISK AND | |||||||||||||||
Michael R. Minogue, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dorothy E. Puhy, Lead Director |
|
✓ |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Jeannine M. Rivet |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Eric A. Rose |
|
✓ |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Martin P. Sutter |
|
✓ |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Paul G. Thomas |
|
✓ |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Christopher D. Van Gorder |
|
✓ |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Myron L. Rolle |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Paula A. Johnson |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Member | ||
Chairperson |
(1) | Each member of the Audit Committee is an independent director within the meaning of the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market, including the enhanced independence requirements applicable to members of audit committees. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate within the meaning of the Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards. In addition, the Board of Directors determined that Ms. Puhy, who serves as Chair of the Audit Committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules and regulations. |
(2) | Each member of the Compensation Committee is an independent director within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq Stock Market rules, including the enhanced independence requirements applicable to members of compensation committees, and a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. |
22
Table of Contents
The Board has adopted written charters for each of the Audit, Compensation, Governance and Nominating and Risk and Compliance Committees. These charters are available in the Investor Information section on the Company’s website at www.abiomed.com. The following table summarizes the primary responsibilities of the committees pursuant to each committee’s charter.
AUDIT COMMITTEE | ||
Meetings held in fiscal 2021: 6 | The Audit Committee is responsible for:
• oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial statements; • the appointment, retention, compensation and review of qualifications and independence, as well as oversight of performance of, our independent registered public accounting firm, including the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services; • oversight of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; • oversight of the performance of our internal audit function and accounting controls; • the scope of our annual audit; • the receipt and review of the response by management to any management letter or report from the independent accountants; • oversight of our financial reporting process and systems of internal accounting and financial controls (including their adequacy and effectiveness); and • other items, including the assessment, monitoring and control of certain financial, legal and other risks, including cybersecurity risks.
The Audit Committee is also responsible for review and approval of any related party transactions required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. The responsibilities and activities of the Audit Committee are further described in “Report of the Audit Committee” and the Audit Committee charter.
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE | ||
Meetings held in fiscal 2021: 5 | The Compensation Committee is responsible for:
• reviewing our compensation philosophy and annually reviewing our executive compensation program; • establishing the compensation for our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and approving the compensation of our executive officers (which is a broader group than our “named executive officers”); • evaluating the annual performance of our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; • approving grants of equity awards, including stock options, RSUs and performance stock units (“PSUs”), to executive officers (except for where authority for grants to employees, who are not considered “executive officers” under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, is delegated to the Special Stock Award Committee, a non-Board, executive committee); • reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors the compensation for our directors; • engaging in risk assessments of the Company’s compensation programs; • adopting rules and making other determinations with respect to the administration of our equity incentive plans, employee stock purchase plan and 401(k) plan; • overseeing compliance with SEC rules and regulations regarding stockholder approval of executive compensation matters; and • approving the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in accordance with applicable rules of the SEC.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee can delegate any or all of its responsibilities to a subcommittee of the committee consisting of two or more members. Our Lead Director, Dorothy E. Puhy, participates in meetings of the Compensation Committee as described above under “Board Leadership—Our Current Board Leadership Structure.” The Compensation Committee is authorized to retain and terminate compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisors to the committee and to approve the engagement of any such consultant, counsel or advisor, to the extent it deems necessary after specifically analyzing the independence of any such consultant retained by the committee. A report of the Compensation Committee is set forth on page 51 of this Proxy Statement.
|
23
Table of Contents
GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE | ||
Meetings held in fiscal 2021: 5 | The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for:
• developing policies and procedures relating to the consideration of director candidates proposed by stockholders; • developing, screening and identifying lists of qualified individual candidates to serve as directors on the Board; • periodically reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding the size, structure and functions of it and its committees; • determining the selection criteria for new directors and recommending new director nominees in accordance with those selection criteria; • reviewing and recommending acceptance of director resignations; • reviewing and monitoring the succession plan for the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and assuring that the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer has obtained succession plans for the senior officers of the Company; • developing and conducting procedures with respect to the annual evaluation of the performance of the Board, its committees and each director; • assisting the Board and management in overseeing ESG initiatives; and • developing and recommending corporate governance policies and procedures appropriate to the Company.
|
RISK AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE | ||
Meetings held in fiscal 2021: 4 | The Risk and Compliance Committee, formerly known as the Regulatory and Compliance Committee, is responsible for:
• assisting the Board of Directors with the oversight of the Company’s risk management, compliance and control activities, including the Company’s risk profile and significant healthcare-related regulatory and compliance issues (such as healthcare fraud and abuse laws, the U.S. Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the U.S Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and foreign laws on the same topics of the jurisdictions where we market and/or sell our products), by evaluating and monitoring the Company’s compliance policies, standards, procedures, systems and initiatives; • providing reports and recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as the adequacy of its compliance program; • approving and monitoring the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management Program; • reviewing and overseeing implementation of the Company’s Healthcare Compliance Program and Work Plan; • establishing a management-level compliance committee, appointing the Chief Compliance Officer and approving all key decisions relating to such officer’s appointment, discipline and termination; and • reviewing and discussing risk- and compliance-related reports prepared and/or received by the Chief Compliance Officer and any management-level compliance committee.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Risk and Compliance Committee can retain independent counsel, experts and consultants as it deems necessary to fulfill its duties. In addition, the Risk and Compliance Committee can, in its discretion, conduct or requirement management to conduct audits, investigations and other reviews relating to the compliance, regulatory or legal risks inherent to the Company’s business.
|
Board and Committee Evaluations
The Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates each director and obtains his or her assessment of the effectiveness of the Board and each committee of the Board on which he or she sits. Separate written questionnaires are circulated annually for the full Board and for each of the four committees of the Board. The purpose of these assessments is to identify opportunities for improvement on a number of relevant metrics such as composition, conduct of meetings, relationship between the Board and management, quality and extent of resources, succession planning and strategy and performance. The Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, with the assistance of management, conducts the evaluation through these questionnaires, reviews all of the responses and reports the results to the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee then summarizes the evaluations and identifies areas in which the Board and its committees could improve its performance and/or composition, and discusses its findings with the Board and each of the other committees.
24
Table of Contents
The written questionnaires for the Board and each committee focus on the following topics:
✓ | our Board’s and each committee’s overall responsibilities and effectiveness; |
✓ | the structure and composition of our Board and each committee (including organization, size, operation, qualifications and diversity); |
✓ | Board culture (both in executive session, as well as in connection with and access to management and advisors); |
✓ | preparedness of Board members ahead of Board and committee meetings; |
✓ | the effectiveness of the performance by the Board and each committee of the duties assigned to it and/or required by relevant rules; |
✓ | oversight of and openness of communication with management, independence from management and effectiveness of involvement in the Company’s business and affairs; |
✓ | the adequacy and quality of information, and access to outside advisors such as auditors and consultants as applicable, provided to our Board and each committee, and oversight of such advisors by our Board and each committee; and |
✓ | the Board’s and each committee’s overall policies, processes and procedures. |
Our Board and management value the perspectives of our stockholders and work to provide our stockholders with continuous and meaningful engagement. Our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have made communication with our stockholders and analysts a priority, and the Board receives relevant feedback from stockholders directly and promptly.
We regularly attend investor conferences and hold one-on-one meetings with stockholders and potential investors throughout the United States as well as overseas. In addition, we have telephonic meetings with stockholders and analysts and review correspondence submitted by stockholders to management and/or the Board. We successfully transitioned our investor communication strategy and initiatives to a virtual platform in light of remote working arrangements in fiscal 2021. As part of our outreach in fiscal 2021, we hosted a Virtual Investor Day, which was attended by over 240 external participants and included presentations from members of our senior management team and expert physicians on our robust clinical data and ongoing and upcoming innovations.
In fiscal 2021, we estimate that our outreach efforts resulted in dialogue with stockholders who own approximately 40% of our outstanding shares, including approximately 50% of our top 10 stockholders and 50% of our top 20 stockholders. During these interactions, stockholders most frequently raised topics concerning the impact of, and trends relating to, the COVID-19 pandemic, existing and future products, clinical data, future trials and our strategic investment initiatives. For more information about our stockholder outreach efforts, specifically related to our executive compensation program, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Views of Our Stockholders.”
The Company is exposed to various risks including, but not limited to, strategic, operational, financial, liquidity and reputational risks. There are additional risks relating to reporting, pending and threatened product liability and intellectual property litigation, and regulatory and legal compliance. The Company’s enterprise risk profile is also affected by the success of our clinical trials, the actions of distributors of our products, the availability of third-party reimbursement for our products and changes in government regulation or in our receipt/maintenance of required regulatory approvals.
Our Board of Directors, as a whole, has responsibility for risk oversight, with reviews of certain areas conducted by the relevant Board committees that report on their deliberations to the Board of Directors. The oversight responsibility of the Board of Directors and its committees is enabled by management reporting to the Board of Directors about the identification, assessment and management of critical risks and management’s risk mitigation strategies. In particular, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, at the direction of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for overseeing the Company’s enterprise risk management program and periodically reports enterprise risk
25
Table of Contents
information to each of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. In fulfilling his risk management responsibilities, the Chief Financial Officer works closely with members of the senior management team, including the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, and Corporate Controller.
While our Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, its committees critically assist the Board in fulfilling its monitoring responsibilities in certain areas of risk. Over the past fiscal year, we have shifted primary responsibility of risk oversight from the Audit Committee to a newly-restructured and enhanced Risk and Compliance Committee (formerly known as the Regulatory and Compliance Committee), which now reviews the Company’s risk-related policies, procedures and programs and coordinates the handling of such matters with the Chief Compliance Officer. The Company’s Chief Financial Officer meets with the Audit Committee from time to time to discuss specifically the enterprise risks facing the Company. Additionally, at certain Board of Directors meetings, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief Financial Officer report information about major risks facing the Company.
Board/Committee | Primary Areas of Risk Oversight | |
Board of Directors | Strategic, financial and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual operating plan, budget and longer-term strategic plan; litigation and regulatory exposures and other current matters that may present material risk to our operations, plans, prospects or reputation; acquisitions and divestitures; and senior officer succession planning. | |
Audit Committee | Risks and exposures associated with financial matters, particularly financial reporting, tax, accounting, disclosure, audit oversight, internal control over financial reporting, financial policies, investment guidelines and liquidity matters, as well as cybersecurity matters. | |
Compensation Committee | Risks and exposures associated with executive compensation programs and arrangements, including incentive plans. | |
Governance and Nominating Committee | Risks and exposures relating to our corporate governance and Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and other director succession planning. | |
Risk and Compliance Committee | Risks and exposures associated with our risk management, compliance and control activities, including the Company’s risk profile and significant healthcare-related regulatory and compliance issues (governing, e.g., fraud and abuse and the development, approval and sale of medical device products, both in the U.S. and internationally); review, approval, management and oversight of Enterprise Risk Management Program, Healthcare Compliance Program and Work Plan and risk and compliance-related reporting (in conjunction with any management-level compliance committee and Chief Compliance Officer). |
Environmental, Social and Governance Initiatives
Currently, our Board and management have oversight responsibility of our ESG strategy and coordinate with our Governance and Nominating Committee to implement initiatives aimed at improving our sustainability footprint and continuing to ensure a strong corporate governance framework. This year, we are proud to have published our inaugural ESG Report, which is available in the Investor Information section of our website at www.abiomed.com. Our ESG Report affirms four core principles that comprise our comprehensive ESG program philosophy: recovering hearts and saving lives; growing stockholder value; leading in technology and innovation; and sustaining a winning culture that prioritizes the health of our patients and needs of our customers. We plan to report on the following efforts, designed to continuously improve our ESG performance and promote sustainable business practices:
Environmental, Health and Safety (“EHS”)
• | efforts to minimize environmental impact, including through spill prevention, waste-to-energy methods, increasing production efficiency and reducing costs associated with purchasing raw materials; |
• | enforcing product safety procedures for our research, production and manufacturing facilities in line with International Organization of Standardization (“ISO”) and Authorized Economic Operator (“AEO”) standards; |
• | instituting quality evaluations of new and existing suppliers to work to improve sustainable sourcing; and |
• | requiring ongoing EHS training programs and education for employees and contractors. |
26
Table of Contents
People and Communities
• | fostering an inclusive, fair and equal employment by engaging an external advisor and working alongside industry groups to guide our efforts in attracting and retaining diverse employees; |
• | providing educational resources to our employees through our online learning platform; and |
• | dedicating efforts to collaborate with global and local non-profit organizations, including through our Diversity in Healthcare Advisory Board and Citizenship and Give Back Program to bring our medical devices to underserved communities, support national heart health initiatives and United States military veterans. |
Integrity, Compliance and Governance
• | enforcing our ethical obligations to our employees, healthcare professionals, suppliers and business partners to by ensuring Company-wide compliance with our Code of Conduct; |
• | strengthening our risk compliance systems, including through the reallocation of risk oversight responsibilities to the newly-designated Risk and Compliance Committee; |
• | ensuring our Board of Directors reflects a diversity of backgrounds, sectors, ages, races and genders per the interests of the Company and its stockholders; and |
• | considering Board refreshment on an ongoing basis. |
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast in both contested elections (elections in which the number of nominees is greater than the number of Board seats open for election) and uncontested elections (elections in which the number of nominees does not exceed the number of Board seats open for election). However, for uncontested elections of directors, our Board of Directors has adopted a director resignation policy. In accordance with this policy, the Board of Directors will nominate for election or re-election only candidates who agree to tender, immediately following the annual meeting at which such candidate is a nominee for election/re-election, an irrevocable offer of resignation that will take effect if, in an uncontested election of directors, the nominee receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” his or her election. The offer of resignation is understood to be conditional upon acceptance by the Board of Directors, following consideration of the offer by the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee.
Where a nominee fails to receive the required number of votes for reelection and the resignation offer takes effect, the Governance and Nominating Committee must promptly consider the offer and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept or reject it. The Board of Directors then must, within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote, act on the Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation and disclose in a filing with the SEC or a widely-disseminated press release the Board’s action and reasons for taking that action.
The Board of Directors may consider any factors or information it deems relevant. In addition, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors may consider a range of alternatives in determining what action to take, including but not limited to: (i) accepting the resignation; (ii) rejecting the resignation, including with conditions for the director’s continued service; (iii) rejecting the resignation to allow the director to remain on the Board of Directors but agreeing that the director will not be nominated for re-election upon expiration of the director’s term; or (iv) deferring acceptance of the director’s resignation until the Board of Directors can find a replacement director with the necessary qualifications to fill the vacancy that accepting the resignation would create.
All of our directors, officers and employees are expected to act ethically, legally and with integrity at all times and are obligated to comply with our U.S. Code of Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”), as well as our other policies and standards of conduct. The Code of Conduct constitutes a “code of ethics” under the applicable rules of the SEC. A copy of our Code of Conduct is available in the Investor Information section of our website at www.abiomed.com, and may also be obtained, without charge, by submitting a written request to our General Counsel at ABIOMED, Inc., 22 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923. We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Conduct within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a website posting to the extent required by the rules and regulations of the SEC.
27
Table of Contents
Stockholder Communications with Directors
Stockholders may send communications to the directors on our Board. Those interested in communicating with one member of the Board of Directors or a group of such members, including the Lead Director of the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Risk and Compliance Committee, the non-employee directors as a group or the Audit Committee, should address their written correspondence in care of the Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at ABIOMED, Inc., 22 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923 and specify in the correspondence to whom on the Board of Directors the correspondence is directed. Complaints or concerns relating to our financial reporting, accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing will be referred to the Chair of our Audit Committee. Correspondence will then be directed to the group of directors, or to an individual director, as appropriate.
The Compensation Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, periodically reviews and evaluates director compensation and makes recommendations to the Board. Our Board reviews director compensation periodically to ensure that the director compensation package remains competitive such that we are able to recruit and retain qualified directors.
Non-Employee Director Compensation
Director Compensation Program
The following conveys compensation paid to our non-employee directors for fiscal 2021:
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
| ||||||||
Form of
| Amount of
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Annual retainer (all non-employee directors) | Cash or common stock | $37,500** | ||||||
Annual stock retainer (all non-employee directors) | | Time-vesting RSUs (vesting on earlier of (i) first anniversary of | | | $200,000 in grant date fair value | | ||
Lead Director | Cash or common stock | $25,000 | ||||||
Chair of Audit Committee | Cash or common stock | $20,000 | ||||||
Chair of Compensation Committee | Cash or common stock | $15,000 | ||||||
Chair of Governance and Nominating Committee | Cash or common stock | $10,000 | ||||||
Chair of Risk and Compliance Committee | Cash or common stock | $10,000 | ||||||
Members of Audit Committee | Cash or common stock | $10,000 | ||||||
Members of Compensation Committee | Cash or common stock | $7,500 | ||||||
Members of Governance and Nominating Committee | Cash or common stock | $5,000 | ||||||
Members of Risk and Compliance Committee | Cash or common stock | $5,000 | ||||||
| ||||||||
Equity grant upon initial appointment
| | Time-vesting RSUs (vesting ratably over three years on each anniversary of grant) | |
| $250,000 in grant date fair value
|
|
* | Where “cash or common stock” is shown, director may choose between either alternative. |
** | The Board of Directors has historically awarded an annual cash retainer to non-employee directors in the amount of $50,000, but decided to reduce this payment for fiscal 2021 in connection with COVID-19 relief efforts, as discussed below. All non-employee directors will receive an annual cash retainer of $50,000 in the ordinary course for fiscal 2022. |
28
Table of Contents
For fiscal 2021, our Board of Directors initially approved an annual cash retainer consistent with its past practice of $50,000. To mitigate the business impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our financial operations, the Board of Directors reduced all Q1 cash retainers for fiscal 2021 by 50% compared to fiscal 2020. These actions, among others, were designed to preserve full-time jobs, preserve cash and retain our ability to ramp up quickly when demand returned, while at the same time continuing to invest in innovation. Following a review of the Company’s subsequent performance during the COVID-19 pandemic, the annual cash retainer was readjusted, such that each director received an annual cash retainer of $37,500 for fiscal 2021. All non-employee directors will receive an annual cash retainer of $50,000 in the ordinary course for fiscal 2022. In addition, we provide reimbursement to our non-employee directors for their reasonable expenses related to their service as a member of the Board of Directors and any committees thereof.
We also currently have a non-employee director retirement policy that provides for the accelerated vesting of all stock options, RSUs and other equity awards held by a non-employee director if he or she permanently ceases his or her service on our Board of Directors by reason of death, disability or retirement following at least five years of service and so long as his or her age plus years of service equals or exceeds 65.
Dr. W. Gerald Austen has served as Director Emeritus of the Company since August 2016. Prior to serving as Director Emeritus, Dr. Austen served on the Company’s Board of Directors for 31 years. In exchange for his service as Director Emeritus, Dr. Austen receives an annual cash retainer equal to the retainer received by other non-employee directors, and an additional annual retainer of $5,000 for his participation in meetings of the Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition, Dr. Austen is eligible for equity grants on the same basis as non-employee directors. In connection with Dr. Austen’s transition to Director Emeritus, his equity awards that were outstanding and unvested as of the expiration of his term as a director on August 10, 2016 continue to remain outstanding and eligible to vest according to their terms so long as Dr. Austen continues to serve as Director Emeritus of the Company. Dr. Austen is the Edward D. Churchill Distinguished Professor of Surgery at Harvard Medical School, Surgeon-in-Chief-Emeritus at Massachusetts General Hospital and Chairman of the Massachusetts General Hospital Chiefs’ Council.
Director Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned by our non-employee directors with respect to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, other than Dr. Johnson, who joined the Board of Directors after the fiscal year end. The compensation of Michael R. Minogue, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer is reported below under the heading “Executive Compensation.”
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors for the Year Ended March 31, 2021
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(3) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
W. Gerald Austen(1) | 42,500 | 199,847 | 242,347 | ||||||||||||
Dorothy E. Puhy | 82,500 | 199,847 | 282,347 | ||||||||||||
Jeannine M. Rivet | 55,000 | 199,847 | 254,847 | ||||||||||||
Myron L. Rolle(2) | 6,479 | 249,877 | 256,356 | ||||||||||||
Eric A. Rose | 47,500 | 199,847 | 247,347 | ||||||||||||
Martin P. Sutter | 55,000 | 199,847 | 254,847 | ||||||||||||
Paul G. Thomas | 57,500 | 199,847 | 257,347 | ||||||||||||
Christopher D. Van Gorder | 52,500 | 199,847 | 252,347 |
(1) | Dr. Austen serves as Director Emeritus. |
(2) | Dr. Rolle’s cash fees were pro-rated for his period of service, as he joined the Board of Directors on February 17, 2021. |
(3) | Amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of 661 RSUs to each non-employee director on August 12, 2020, other than Dr. Rolle, who was not yet serving on the Board of Directors at the time. For Dr. Rolle, the amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value of 790 RSUs in connection with his appointment. All RSU grants were made under the Second Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). In each case, amounts were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, based on the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date. Please refer to Note 11 of our consolidated financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2021 (the “2021 Annual Report”), as filed with the SEC, for further discussion related to the assumptions used in our valuation. |
29
Table of Contents
The following table provides a summary of the aggregate number of unvested RSUs outstanding for each of the above non-employee directors as of March 31, 2021.
Name | Unvested RSUs Outstanding | ||||
W. Gerald Austen(1) | 661 | ||||
Dorothy E. Puhy | 661 | ||||
Jeannine M. Rivet | 661 | ||||
Myron L. Rolle | 790 | ||||
Eric A. Rose | 661 | ||||
Martin P. Sutter | 661 | ||||
Paul G. Thomas | 661 | ||||
Christopher D. Van Gorder | 661 |
(1) | Dr. Austen serves as Director Emeritus. |
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
We have stock ownership guidelines that require each director to beneficially own shares of our common stock (including common stock held in trust, by certain family members or in the Company’s 401(k) plan and stock underlying unvested RSUs or restricted stock awards, but excluding stock underlying options or stock appreciation rights and unvested or unearned PSUs or other performance stock awards) with the equivalent value, as of the acquisition date, of at least five times the aggregate annual cash retainer for a director. Each director is required to achieve such stock ownership requirements by the date of the fifth anniversary of such director’s appointment. Until the required ownership level is reached, directors are required to retain at least 50% of the shares, net of applicable tax withholding and the payment of any exercise or purchase price (if applicable), received upon the vesting or settlement of equity awards or the exercise of stock options. As of March 31, 2021, all of our directors then serving, except Dr. Rolle (who joined our Board in February 2021), had met the stock ownership requirement.
30
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION |
Our Compensation Committee consists of Paul G. Thomas (Chair), Jeannine M. Rivet and Martin P. Sutter. No member of our Compensation Committee is a former or current officer or employee of the Company. Our Lead Director, Dorothy E. Puhy, participates in meetings of the Compensation Committee as described above under “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Lead Director.” Mr. Minogue, while not a member of the Compensation Committee, makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of executive officers other than himself and often participates in the Compensation Committee’s deliberations, but does not vote on such matters. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during fiscal 2021, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as members of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
31
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes the compensation philosophy, policies and practices associated with our executive compensation program for fiscal 2021 and the context in which compensation-related decisions were made in relation to fiscal 2021 for the “named executive officers” listed below. It also briefly outlines certain aspects of our executive compensation program for fiscal 2022.
Our Named Executive Officers in Fiscal 2021
The following individuals were named executive officers (also referred to as “NEOs”) in fiscal 2021:
Named Executive Officer
| Title
| |
Michael R. Minogue
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
Todd A. Trapp
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
Andrew J. Greenfield
| Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer | |
David M. Weber
| Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | |
Marc A. Began
| Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Executive Summary
Performance Highlights
• | Financial Performance – In fiscal 2021, the Company took steps to mitigate the negative business impact of COVID-19 by adjusting costs to preserve full-time jobs, allow for strategic growth investments and maintain profitability. These cost adjustments included reduced bonuses and salary/retainer cuts for the executive leadership team, senior level employees and the Board, as well as a halt on hiring of non-essential workers. Despite the significant COVID-19 challenge, our business adapted, and we executed and delivered top-line growth for the year and top-tier GAAP-operating margins, while delivering on our clinical, regulatory and innovation milestones. |
○ | Revenue increased to $848 million in fiscal 2021, growing one percent over fiscal 2020, despite a significant decline in revenue year over year in Q1 2021, on the negative headwinds of the global COVID-19 pandemic. As revenue fell 21% year over year in Q1 2021 due to government restrictions on elective procedures and limitations on access at most hospitals, we acted swiftly to implement the cost-saving measures noted above, helping to preserve jobs for our full-time employees and working to maintain revenue growth. Our revenue grew 29% sequentially and two percent year over year in Q2 2021. In the second half of fiscal 2021, the Company reached record revenue in both Q3 2021 and Q4 2021, growing five percent and 17% year over year, respectively. |
○ | GAAP operating income for fiscal 2021 was $230 million, which equates to a 27.1% operating margin, among the highest in our compensation peer group (as listed under below “Compensation Peer Group” and referred to in this Proxy Statement as our “Peer Group”). We took a fiscally disciplined approach throughout the year as we controlled discretionary expenses and instituted temporary actions to reduce costs, while investing at record levels in innovation and clinical evidence, with R&D investment increasing 23% over fiscal 2020. |
○ | Operating cash flow was $275 million in fiscal 2021, and as a result, cash grew to $848 million, an increase of 30% over fiscal 2020. |
32
Table of Contents
○ | The Company continues to have no debt and takes a disciplined approach to capital deployment in order to drive long-term sustainable growth. |
• | The below graphs show the Company’s key financial results for fiscal 2021, including growth over the past five years, as a supplement to the presentation against fiscal 2020 above. Over the past five years, the Company has ranked in the top 10 of its Peer Group for annual revenue growth and in the top five in operating margin percentage each year. The Company consistently remains one of the fastest growing, most GAAP-profitable companies amongst its peers. |
Revenue ($M) | R&D Investment (Expenses in $M) | |
GAAP Operating Income ($M) | Cash ($M) | |
|
• | Total Stockholder Return – The Company’s financial and operational execution continues to translate into sustained stock price growth for the benefit of our stockholders. The following chart depicts our total stockholder return (“TSR”) for the one, five and 10-year periods ended March 31, 2021. The Company delivered strong returns for stockholders in fiscal 2021, despite the global market challenges from COVID-19. The Company’s fiscal 2021 TSR was 120%, which was among the top 95th percentile in the Peer Group. Also, for calendar year 2020, the Company was among the top 15 best-performing stocks in the S&P 500. |
33
Table of Contents
The Company’s 10-year TSR of 2,094% was more than three times that of the Peer Group average and more than four times that of the Nasdaq Composite. Over the last decade, the Company was among the top five performers listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
• | Business Achievements – Other key performance milestones in fiscal 2021 included: |
○ | Regulatory Approvals: |
✓ | The FDA issued multiple Emergency Use Authorizations for Impella for use in patients suffering with COVID-19 related right heart failure or decompensation, including pulmonary embolism and for left-sided Impella heart pumps to provide left ventricular unloading and support to COVID-19 patients who are undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment and develop pulmonary edema or myocarditis. |
✓ | The FDA approved one-way digital data streaming during patient support from the Company’s Automated Impella Controller (“AIC”), the external console used with Impella heart pumps. This approval means console data can be streamed live via Impella Connect to a secure server where, in the future, AIC could provide predictive clinical information to the patient’s physician. |
○ | Clinical Outcomes: We announced results of the following studies: |
✓ | A three-year, investigator-led, prospective study of Japanese patients who received an Impella heart pump found that the use of Impella is associated with a 77% survival rate at 30 days in acute myocardial infarction (“AMI”) cardiogenic shock patients. The interim analysis examined 819 patients treated with Impella for a variety of conditions, including cardiogenic shock and fulminant myocarditis. Other findings include that Impella therapy is a highly effective treatment for myocarditis, with an 88% survival rate at 30 days. |
✓ | At the Cardiovasular Research Foundation’s Transcatheter Cardiovasular Therapeutics Connect conference, held virtually in October 2020 (“TCT Connect 2020”), more than 20 presentations and abstracts were presented validating the benefits of a more complete revascularization with Impella heart pumps in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (“PCI”) patients. The presentations at TCT Connect 2020 also revealed the value of Impella protocol-based treatment for survival and native heart recovery in cardiogenic shock and right heart failure patients. |
34
Table of Contents
○ | Innovation Milestones: |
✓ | We accelerated the roll-out of Impella Connect in the United States and abroad. At the end of fiscal 2021, the Impella Connect was in approximately 1,000 hospitals, or approximately 70% of our sites, in the United States, 25 hospitals in Germany and 44 hospitals in Japan. |
✓ | We continued our controlled launch of the Impella 5.5 with SmartAssist. Within fiscal 2021, we surpassed the 1,000 patient milestone and grew U.S. surgical revenue by 43% year-over year. |
✓ | We expanded our product portfolio by acquiring Breethe, Inc., a developer of a novel ECMO system, to serve more comprehensively the needs of patients whose lungs can no longer provide sufficient oxygenation. The FDA granted a 510(k) clearance for the ABIOMED Breethe OXY-1 System, an all-in-one, compact cardiopulmonary bypass support system, and we treated the first patients with this innovative ECMO technology. |
✓ | The FDA approved our investigational device exemption application to start an early feasibility study with a first-in-human trial of the 9 French (Fr) Impella ECP heart pump. Within fiscal 2021, we treated the first patients with the Impella ECP and completed the first stage in our early feasibility study. |
✓ | The FDA granted 510(k) clearance to the XR Sheath for the Impella 2.5. |
✓ | We continued to strengthen our intellectual property and surpassed ownership of 1,150 patents worldwide, with more than 940 additional patents pending. |
Compensation Program Highlights
Our Compensation Philosophy
The primary objectives of our executive compensation program include:
✓ | tying executive compensation to performance objectives and long-term stockholder returns; |
✓ | attracting, retaining and motivating key executives with compensation that is competitive with that of our Peer Group; and |
✓ | rewarding superior financial, strategic and operational performance that is achieved in a manner consistent with our corporate goals and team-oriented values. |
We have a strong pay-for-performance culture, which has benefited our stockholders over the long term. This is evident in the Company’s financial performance as one of the fastest growing, most GAAP-profitable companies in the MedTech industry, and one of the top performing stocks over the both last year and the last decade, compared to each of its Peer Group, the Nasdaq Stock Market and the S&P 500. For more information, see “—Executive Summary—Performance Highlights.”
Fiscal 2021 Compensation: Pay Mix
As part of this pay-for-performance culture, the Company consistently sets aggressive and difficult-to-achieve goals, which the Company believes have led to it historically outperforming its Peer Group. We use a mix of different forms of pay when we initially set annual compensation, so as to align management’s incentives strongly with our long-term business goals and stockholder interests. The below summarizes the pay mix of our fiscal 2021 executive compensation program, based on equity amounts granted in fiscal 2021, and annual cash incentive awards actually paid to our named executive officers for the year, excluding benefits.
35
Table of Contents
CEO TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2021(1)
| AVERAGE OTHER NEO TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2021(1)
| |
(1) | For each NEO, total direct compensation excludes the value of benefits, which were below $10,000. For each NEO, PSUs include the values of both the annual PSU grant and the one-time COVID-19 recovery grant (the “COVID-19 recovery grant”). |
• | The overall mix was very heavily weighted toward variable, incentive-based cash and stock compensation (for our CEO, 96% and, on average for our other NEOs, 92%). |
• | Variable compensation was primarily weighted toward long-term equity incentives, including performance-based PSUs, time-based RSUs and time-vesting stock options. |
• | Long-term equity incentive awards were largely performance-based. Based on the grant date fair values: |
• | approximately 80% of our CEO’s and our average other NEOs’ long-term equity incentive awards were performance-based, with approximately 70% made up of PSUs and 10% made up of stock options, including, in all cases, the COVID-19 recovery grant; and; |
• | approximately 70% of our CEO’s and our other NEOs’ long-term equity incentive awards were performance-based, with approximately 50% made up of PSUs and 20% made up of stock options, excluding, in all cases, the COVID-19 recovery grant. |
Fiscal 2021 Compensation: Pay Design
As previously disclosed, in response to extensive investor feedback from our outreach efforts and the results of our fiscal 2019 “say-on-pay” vote, as well as prior performance and input from our independent compensation consultant on market practices, we made several enhancements to the design of our fiscal 2021 executive compensation program. Our reforms more closely support our pay-for-performance philosophy and better align long-term stockholder value creation with our business objectives as we mature as a company. Some of the reforms include the following:
✓ Annual PSU grants have three-year performance periods • In fiscal 2021, we made a transition award of PSUs to our named executive officers, under which 25% of shares underlying the PSUs may vested in fiscal 2023, and the remaining 75% may vest in fiscal 2024, based on a three-year performance period. This award is meant to facilitate the transition from PSUs with historically one-year performance periods to those with three-year periods. • Following fiscal 2021, all annual PSU grants will vest once after a three-year period.
✓ Annual PSU grants have challenging and diverse goals • Relative TSR metric and business operational metrics. • Relative TSR metric caps payouts at target if our absolute TSR is negative, regardless of our relative TSR. • Relative TSR metric requires challenging 90th percentile relative TSR for maximum payout.
✓ Continued use of risk mitigation measures • Robust executive officer stock ownership guidelines. • Double-trigger vesting provisions in NEOs’ RSU, PSU and option awards.
|
36
Table of Contents
The above table only discusses our annual PSU grants. For information on the COVID-19 recovery grants, see “Impact of COVID-19” below. For fiscal 2021, as part of our annual equity grants, we also re-introduced RSUs to compose approximately 30% of our NEOs’ total equity pay mix excluding the COVID-19 recovery grant (or approximately 20% on average of our NEOs’ total equity pay mix including such award).
Fiscal 2021 Compensation: Pay Amount
We also exercised care and prudence in determining the amount of compensation granted in fiscal 2021, as discussed below.
• | Salary cuts: Because of uncertainty due to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic in Q1 2021 and an anticipated negative impact on our operations (as discussed in more depth under “Impact of COVID-19”), NEO salaries were reduced substantially from fiscal 2020, thus making up a smaller percentage of total compensation. During Q1 2021, Mr. Minogue and Dr. Weber took a complete (100%) reduction in base salary, other than payments necessary to retain their benefits, and Messrs. Trapp, Greenfield and Began took a 50% reduction in base salary. |
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER | CHANGE IN FISCAL 2021 SALARY COMPARED TO FISCAL 2020 | |
Michael R. Minogue | q21% | |
Todd A. Trapp | q12% | |
Andrew J. Greenfield | q10% | |
David M. Weber | q26% | |
Marc A. Began | q12% |
• | Reduction in CEO equity grant date fair value: We awarded to our CEO annual equity grants in fiscal 2021 with a total grant date fair value, which was lower than that granted in fiscal 2020. This remained the case even after including the effect of our COVID-19 recovery grants (as discussed under “Impact of COVID-19”). |
CEO EQUITY COMPENSATION(1)
| ||||||
Fiscal 2020 Grant Date Fair Value | Fiscal 2021 Grant Date Fair Value (Excluding COVID-19 Recovery Grant) | Fiscal 2021 Grant Date Fair Value (Including COVID-19 Recovery Grant) | ||||
Amount | $15 million | $9 million | $12.2 million | |||
Change | n/a | q40% | q18% |
(1) | This column assumes PSU payouts at target. Although the equity grant fair date value was significantly higher in fiscal 2020 than in fiscal 2021, as previously disclosed, no PSUs were actually paid out in fiscal 2020, even despite our 9% revenue growth at the 60th percentile of our Peer Group, due to the high difficulty of achieving the PSU goals. We believe that this result demonstrates the strength of our program in optimizing “at risk” compensation. |
Impact of COVID-19
Although we had already determined before the onset of COVID-19 to change the design of our fiscal 2021 compensation program, our executive compensation decisions were shaped by the pandemic. Beginning in mid-March 2020, we experienced a decline in patient utilization in our main markets in the U.S., Europe and Japan as healthcare systems diverted resources to meet the increasing demands of managing COVID-19. Our business was most impacted in Q1 2021, in terms of the decline in patients and revenue from the shelter-in-place restrictions in a majority of countries and limitations on procedures in hospitals. We faced several challenges, including decreased demand for our products from the deferral or cancellation of medical procedures and decreased customer education and training opportunities due to social distancing measures.
In light of the disruption and uncertainty created by the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and an anticipated negative impact on our operations based on its initial effects on our business, in April 2020, all NEOs agreed to take a salary cut for Q1 2021. Mr. Minogue and Dr. Weber completely forwent their base salaries, other than payments necessary to retain their benefits, and Messrs. Trapp, Greenfield and Began took a 50% reduction in base salary. We also reduced our board members’ Q1 2021 cash retainers by 50% compared to fiscal 2020, imposed a hold on most external hiring,
37
Table of Contents
eliminated non-critical consultants, contractors, and temporary workers, reduced discretionary spending, implemented alternate work schedules for the Aachen and Danvers production teams, and requested that non-director employees at Massachusetts and German headquarters take a minimum of one-week furlough or unused vacation during Q1 2021. These actions, among others, were designed to preserve full-time jobs, preserve cash and retain our ability to ramp up quickly when demand returned, while at the same time continuing to invest in innovation.
Despite the significant COVID-19 challenges faced during the fiscal year, our business adapted and executed and delivered global sequential improvement each quarter. In Q1 2021, we experienced a significant decline in revenue year over year (minus 21%); however, in Q2 2021, the business grew 29% sequentially and two percent year over year (minus 21%). In the second half of fiscal 2021, the Company reached record revenues in both Q3 2021 and Q4 2021, growing five percent and 17% year over year, respectively. In total, our year-end revenue exceeded fiscal 2020 revenue notwithstanding the COVID-19 pandemic. These results stemmed in part from improved trends in patient procedure volume, caused by the high-risk nature of the patient population treated with our Impella devices, the expectation that the majority of these patients would ultimately seek treatment despite any delays caused by COVID-19 and improved hospital protocols.
Compared to other cardiovascular medical device companies, these financial results were strong during fiscal 2021 because senior management executed our COVID-19 playbook and adapted it to evolving circumstances, and continued to focus during the hardships of the pandemic on our strategic long-term goals. Despite the selective cost measures noted above, in fiscal 2021, we continued to invest strategically in innovation, clinical evidence and distribution in order to support our future growth initiatives. Our research and development expenses increased 23% in fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020.
Additionally, during the pandemic, our priorities were and continue to be to protect the well-being of our employees, support our clinician partners and maintain continuous access to our life-saving technologies while offering front-line in-hospital support. We and our employees have worked together to institute, and maintain ongoing compliance with, stringent safety protocols to ensure continued production in our U.S. and German facilities throughout the pandemic. Protocols include working shift adjustments to increase social distancing, requirements for the wearing of masks and personal protective gear and for physical distancing, daily on-site COVID-19 testing for our employees in both Danvers, Massachusetts and Aachen, Germany for early virus detection, the placement of temperature-taking stations, increased sanitizing in between shifts and readily available hand sanitizing stations in order to maintain a safe working environment for our employees. Our proactive testing program has reduced exposure with early detection, reduced employee anxiety and enabled our manufacturing facilities to operate at full capacity in pursuit of our long-term business plan.
To align management around our ongoing strategic COVID-19 recovery plan, and taking into account our NEOs’ performance during the COVID-19 pandemic to date, market data and the input of our independent compensation consultant, our Compensation Committee determined to make a COVID-19 recovery grant to each of our NEOs in November 2020. Unlike our annual PSUs, which have a three-year performance period, these awards contain a one-year performance period, as they are intended to motivate and reward senior management’s performance in handling immediate issues raised by COVID-19 while still continuing to drive our long-term growth and innovation goals, with performance metrics based on revenue growth and business operations milestones relating to the pandemic. We believe these awards, which raised the performance-based composition of our fiscal 2021 compensation to 80% of total equity pay, are also consistent with the pay-for-performance culture that has made us successful and our use of compensation to align management’s and stockholders’ interests. For more information, see “Fiscal 2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards.”
38
Table of Contents
Key Overall Features of Our Executive Compensation
The key features of our executive compensation program are summarized below.
Things we do
| Things we don’t do
| |
✓ Pay a significant majority of executive compensation in the form of long-term incentive-based awards, with the largest portion in performance-based awards
✓ Cap the maximum payout under our annual incentive plan and vesting of our performance-based PSUs
✓ Set challenging targets and performance metrics for our annual cash incentive awards and PSUs, sometimes leading to lower or no payouts as in fiscal 2020
✓ Grant annual PSU awards with three-year performance periods
✓ Grant new RSU, PSU and option awards to NEOs with double-trigger vesting conditions upon a change in control
✓ Use diverse performance metrics across our annual cash incentive plan and long-term performance-based equity incentive awards, including relative TSR, quarter-over-growth revenue growth and business operational metrics (such as manufacturing, human capital milestones and product development)
✓ Maintain a formal claw-back policy for cash- and equity-based incentive programs
✓ Require NEOs to adhere to robust stock ownership guidelines
✓ Conduct an annual risk assessment of our compensation programs
✓ Engage an independent consultant to provide support and advice to the Compensation Committee
| × Provide executive perquisites
× Allow our executive officers, directors or employees to hedge or pledge our stock (without exception)
× Provide new tax gross-ups
× Re-price underwater options
× Pay guaranteed bonuses
× Encourage excessive risk-taking
× Pay dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned PSUs
× Guarantee equity incentive awards for our NEOs |
Continued Reforms in Fiscal 2022 Compensation
Consistent with the reforms made to our executive pay program in fiscal 2021, and considering our strategic plans for growth and expansion, our corporate performance and individual performance, market data and the input of our external advisers, we designed our NEOs’ fiscal 2022 compensation to include the following features:
✓ PSUs continue to make up largest portion of long-term equity incentive mix • Further “at risk” compensation in the form of options, with RSUs composing remainder of mix.
✓ Annual PSU grants continue to have three-year performance periods and challenging and diverse goals • Annual PSU grants will vest once after a three-year period. • Challenging revenue growth and relative TSR metric metrics. • Relative TSR metric caps payouts at 200% of target if our absolute TSR is negative, regardless of our relative TSR, and is based only on performance relative to our Peer Group, with no modifier based on TSR relative to S&P 500.
✓ Decreased equity grant date fair values • Approximately 25% reduction from fiscal 2021 for our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
|
39
Table of Contents
Compensation Elements
We aim to deliver levels of total compensation that advance our overarching pay-for-performance philosophy, while remaining market competitive. To that end, the compensation of our named executive officers in fiscal 2021 consisted of base salary, annual cash incentive awards, the grant of “at-risk” equity incentives and participation in benefit plans generally available to all employees. The largest component of our named executive officers’ annual compensation program is equity incentives, followed by, depending on the individual, cash-based incentive compensation or base salary.
As demonstrated by the pie charts in “Executive Summary,” the vast majority of fiscal 2021 compensation for our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and NEOs was variable and incentive-based, including cash and equity, and within equity, a significant majority was “at risk” or performance-based. All variable, incentive-based pay constituted approximately 96% of total direct compensation for our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and approximately 92% of total direct compensation on average for our other NEOs. With respect to equity awards, on average, approximately 70% of our NEOs’ annual fiscal 2021 grants were performance-based, consisting of approximately 20% of time-based stock options and 50% of performance-based PSUs. After the inclusion of our COVID-19 recovery grant, approximately 80% of our NEOs’ fiscal 2021 equity grants were performance-based, consisting of approximately 10% of time-based stock options and 70% of performance-based PSUs. We believe this practice is consistent with our philosophy of tying executive compensation to performance, while also rewarding our named executive officers for exceeding expectations. All of the percentages in this paragraph assume equity grants at their grant date fair values (including both annual PSUs and the COVID-19 recovery grants) and annual cash incentive awards at their actual payout amounts.
The following table summarizes components of our fiscal 2021 executive compensation, including annual compensation and the COVID-19 recovery grant.
FISCAL 2021 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | ||||
Element
| Purpose
| Key Features
| ||
Base Salary | Provide competitive baseline compensation and a level of cash income predictability and stability | ✓ Fixed cash compensation
✓ Amounts informed by external market data, accounting for factors such as scope of the position, experience and performance
✓ Target competitive range at or below median (on average among our named executive officers) among our compensation Peer Group | ||
Annual Incentive Plan (Cash Bonus) | Reward the achievement of corporate and individual performance during the year and demonstration of competencies from our Core Principles and Operating Procedures | ✓ Variable cash compensation governed by terms of plan
✓ Performance metrics include absolute revenue amounts requiring growth in upper quartile Peer Group
✓ Target opportunity determined in consideration of external market data
✓ Actual value based on a combination of Company financial performance and individually defined, pre-established performance objectives and demonstration of competencies for any payout | ||
Long-Term Equity Incentives | Align with the long-term interests of our Company, our stockholders and our executives, while rewarding sustainable value creation and driving retention | ✓ Variable equity-based compensation governed by award agreements
✓ Size of awards and metrics determined in consideration of external market data
✓ Performance metrics in all PSUs require difficult targets
✓ Relative TSR, business and other targets, capped at target payout for negative absolute TSR (annual PSU grants)
✓ Revenue targets in upper quartile among Peer Group and business targets (COVID-19 recovery grants)
✓ Annual PSUs contain three-year performance period
✓ Options have three-year ratable vesting with a 10-year term and are intended to put a greater portion of total compensation “at risk”
✓ Time-based RSUs used to buttress retention of top talent |
40
Table of Contents
Compensation Oversight
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee, which consists entirely of independent directors, oversees our executive compensation programs and met throughout fiscal 2021 to discuss the key items described under “The Annual Process.” The Compensation Committee administers our annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentive plans and reviews performance levels relevant to compensation. It also decides the compensation of all named executive officers other than our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, seeks to ensure that all executive compensation is fair and aligned with our compensation policy, and makes recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to the compensation of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our compensation practices generally. Although the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer oversees the Board of Directors as its Chairman, he recuses himself from all Board discussions and decisions on his own compensation.
The Compensation Committee reviews all of the information presented and discusses the recommendations with the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and with our compensation consultant. In making decisions regarding pay levels and practices for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors, including:
• | absolute corporate performance relative to our objectives; |
• | our corporate performance relative to our established Peer Group; |
• | creation of long-term value for our stockholders and stockholder views on compensation; |
• | feedback from stockholders and proxy advisers as part of outreach efforts; and |
• | compensation practices observed in our established Peer Group. |
The duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are laid out in its charter, which can be found on our website, and described under “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Committees of the Board of Directors—Compensation Committee.”
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant
As outlined in its charter, the Compensation Committee has the right to retain compensation consultants (and other outside consultants) to provide independent advice to the Compensation Committee. In fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee appointed Willis Towers Watson as an independent outside compensation consultant. During fiscal 2021, Willis Towers Watson advised the Compensation Committee on various compensation-related items, including peer group development, market practices, industry trends, investor views and market data. In addition, Willis Towers Watson reviewed and provided the Compensation Committee with an independent perspective of management recommendations on compensation. As part of its annual independence assessment during fiscal 2021 (cited under “—Annual Process” below), the Compensation Committee considered the six factors specified by the SEC in Rule 10C-1 and by Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 5605(d)(3)(D) to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant, and determined that Willis Towers Watson’s services did not raise a conflict of interest.
Role of Management
Each year, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer provides an assessment of the performance of each named executive officer, other than himself, during the prior year and recommends to the Compensation Committee the compensation to be awarded to each executive officer, which is then determined by the Compensation Committee. The Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations are based on numerous factors including:
• | corporate and individual performance; |
• | leadership competencies; and |
• | market competitiveness. |
41
Table of Contents
The Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer also provides a self-assessment of his achievements for the prior year, which the Compensation Committee reviews and considers when making a recommendation for an appropriate level of compensation for the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer to the Board for approval. The Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer does not participate in any deliberations regarding his own compensation.
The Annual Process
The Compensation Committee typically meets at least four times a year to consider the items discussed below.
Quarter
| Typical Meeting Topics
| |||
Q1 | ✓ | Review and approve executive compensation for current fiscal year, including salaries, bonuses and long-term incentive awards, and approve any bonus and long-term incentive award payouts for prior year | ||
✓ | Assess compliance with stock ownership guidelines | |||
✓ | Review historical equity awards and resulting burn rates | |||
✓ | Review and finalize relevant proxy statement content for upcoming annual meeting of stockholders
| |||
Q2 | ✓ | Review and discuss proxy advisory reports and other investor feedback | ||
✓ | Review and discuss executive compensation risk assessment | |||
✓ | Review current compensation philosophy | |||
✓ | Undertake Compensation Committee self-evaluation
| |||
Q3 | ✓ | Receive update on legislative, regulatory and governance environments | ||
✓ | Conduct annual Peer Group review | |||
✓ | Review factors affecting independence of compensation consultant | |||
✓ | Review regulatory trends
| |||
Q4 | ✓ | Review Compensation Committee charter | ||
✓ | Review and consider executive compensation benchmarking
|
Views of our Stockholders
The Compensation Committee is committed to regularly reviewing, assessing and, when appropriate, adjusting the Company’s compensation programs based on feedback from our stockholders, best practices and compensation trends. At our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we received substantial support for our executive compensation program, with approximately 94% of the votes cast (excluding broker non-votes) for the approval of our annual “say-on-pay” proposal. Due to prior performance and significant investor feedback, including the results of our fiscal 2019 “say-on-pay” vote (the approval of 54% of votes cast), we had already decided at the time of the meeting to enhance our fiscal 2021 executive compensation program and fiscal 2020 compensation disclosures, including with the input of Willis Towers Watson. For more information, see “Executive Summary.” The Compensation Committee believes the results of the fiscal 2020 “say-on-pay” vote convey highly positive stockholder support for its decisions on annual executive compensation and illustrate that the Company’s reformed fiscal 2021 executive compensation program is aligned with our stated compensation philosophy and objectives.
Compensation Peer Group
To understand the market competitiveness of the compensation for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviews a report analyzing publicly available information and surveys prepared by Willis Towers Watson. The report compares the compensation of each named executive officer to data for comparable positions at companies in our Peer Group. The Compensation Committee reviews our Peer Group annually, with input from Willis Towers Watson. Consideration in creating the Peer Group is given to various factors, including:
• | relative size to our Company (revenue, market capitalization, GAAP operating margin and other relevant criteria); and |
• | nature of business (business focus and model). |
42
Table of Contents
Based on a review of these factors, our Compensation Committee did not make changes in fiscal 2021 to the Peer Group from fiscal 2020. The fiscal 2021 compensation Peer Group comprised the following companies:
• Align Technology, Inc.
• Avanos Medical, Inc. (formerly known as Halyard Health, Inc.)
• Cantel Medical Corp.
• CONMED Corporation
• DexCom, Inc.
• Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
• Globus Medical, Inc.
| • Haemonetics Corporation
• Hologic, Inc.
• ICU Medical, Inc.
• Inogen, Inc.
• Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
• Masimo Corporation | • Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
• Natus Medical Incorporated
• Nevro Corp.
• NuVasive, Inc.
• Penumbra, Inc.
• ResMed Inc.
• Teleflex Incorporated |
We pay each of our named executive officers a base salary to provide a baseline level of compensation that is both competitive with the market and commensurate with each employee’s past performance, experience, responsibilities and skills. Base salaries are set using the median of companies in our compensation Peer Group as an initial reference point with consideration of the factors described above. For our named executive officers, the percentage increase from fiscal 2020 corresponded to the named executive officer’s overall performance ranking of 1 to 4 under his annual cash incentive award in fiscal 2020 (which ranking system is described in more detail under “Fiscal 2021 Annual Incentive Plan” below), while taking into account market adjustments. Base salaries may also be adjusted from time to time based upon the Company’s overall budgetary guidelines, employee promotions or increased responsibilities.
At the outset of fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee, and in the case of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Board approved base salaries equal to those in fiscal 2020 for all named executive officers. On average among our named executive officers, these initial salaries ranked at or below the median of companies in our Peer Group. Shortly afterward, in April 2020, the Company announced that, in light of the disruption and uncertainty created by the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and its anticipated impact on the Company’s operations (as described above in “Executive Summary—Impact of COVID-19”), all NEOs would take a salary cut for Q1 2021, with Mr. Minogue and Dr. Weber completely forgoing their base salaries, other than payments necessary to retain their benefits, and Messrs. Trapp, Greenfield and Began taking a 50% reduction in base salary. These actions, among others, were designed to preserve full-time jobs, preserve cash and retain our ability to ramp up quickly when demand returns, while at the same time continuing to invest in innovation. Such cuts resulted the following salaries for fiscal 2021:
Named Executive Officer
| Fiscal 2021 Base Salary
| Fiscal 2020 Base Salary
| Change
| ||||||||||||
Michael R. Minogue | $608,363 | $768,459 | q21% | ||||||||||||
Todd A. Trapp | $430,000 | $480,000 | q12% | ||||||||||||
Andrew J. Greenfield | $301,454 | $336,507 | q10% | ||||||||||||
David M. Weber | $350,363 | $442,564 | q26% | ||||||||||||
Marc A. Began | $342,656 | $382,500 | q12% |
Fiscal 2021 Annual Incentive Plan
We maintain the Annual Incentive Plan, a cash incentive plan, for all employees, including our named executive officers. The purpose of this program is (i) to motivate and reward among our named executive officers the attainment of several measurable performance objectives, including annually-set financial, strategic and operational goals (the “Performance Goals”), and (ii) to encourage the named executive officers to uphold a strong work ethic and a healthy corporate culture via certain leadership factors (the “Leadership Factors”).
43
Table of Contents
Each named executive officer is assessed against these Performance Goals and Leadership Factors according to his achievement during the fiscal year. Based on relative weighting among the multiple Performance Goals, as well as between the Performance Goals and the Leadership Factors, the named executive officer ultimately receives an overall rating of 1 to 4 (with 4 representing the highest degree of performance), which translates to a defined bonus payout as a percentage of target bonus. Named executive officers, other than the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, are evaluated by the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board completes the evaluation for the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Target Annual Cash Incentive Levels
Under the Annual Incentive Plan, at the outset of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee analyzes external market data and prior year targets to establish target and maximum annual cash incentive levels for our named executive officers other than our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. For our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee undergoes the same rigorous process and recommends target and maximum annual cash incentive levels to the Board, which then determines whether to approve it. Annual cash incentive opportunities for fiscal 2021 were targeted at a level that represented a meaningful portion of each named executive officer’s base salary and were competitive with our peers. Additionally, bearing in mind the salary decreases and related cost-cutting measures in connection with COVID-19 in Q1 2021, we made no or only moderate changes to the size of our target annual cash incentive awards in fiscal 2021, compared to fiscal 2020. The target awards as a percentage of salary were as follows: for Mr. Minogue, 195% (representing no change from fiscal 2020); for Mr. Trapp, 65% (representing no change from fiscal 2020); for Mr. Greenfield, 75% (representing no change from fiscal 2020); for Dr. Weber, 85% (representing no change from fiscal 2020); and for Mr. Began, 55% (representing a 5% change from fiscal 2020).
Actual cash incentive awards can range from 0% to 200% of target award levels. The Compensation Committee and Board found that it was important to establish maximum payout amounts under the Annual Incentive Plan to prevent a risk of excessive cash compensation.
Evaluations Based on Performance Goals and Leadership Factors
For each named executive officer, there were two components to the award in fiscal 2021:
• | 70% was based on the achievement of the Performance Goals, including (i) revenue, and (ii) depending on the named executive officer’s responsibilities, four to five other financial, operational and strategic goals; and |
• | 30% was based on an assessment of the executive officer’s achievement against the Leadership Factors. |
Performance Goals are developed by our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with other members of senior management, and presented to our Compensation Committee for review and approval on an annual basis (other than with respect to our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, whose goals are recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board). For each Performance Goal, we establish quantitative or qualitative performance targets for each rating level on a 1-to-4 rating scale. To prevent excessive discretion in annual assessments of performance, these targets are clearly defined, objective hurdles—whether numerical or qualitative—that the named executive officer must satisfy to obtain the applicable rating level. We use our annual operating plan as the foundation for setting the Performance Goals.
We retained the revenue metric in our fiscal 2021 cash incentive awards, based on our belief that it remains a highly effective measure of our attainment of our “Patients First” goal. As a GAAP-profitable MedTech growth company, we believe revenue represents a highly effective financial measure of the attainment of our “Patients First” goal, and so we include revenue as a Performance Goal for all named executive officers. In our efforts to make our technology the standard of care, we consistently strive to improve patient outcomes. Such improved outcomes increase Impella® utilization and enable us to reinvest in training, research and development, sales, marketing and educational initiatives. We also believe that revenue has been the driving factor in our TSR, and thus a tool for promoting stockholder value.
44
Table of Contents
We undergo a rigorous process to ensure our Performance Goals are challenging, aligning management incentives with enhancement of long-term stockholder value. We believe that these high and demanding targets, when looked against our maximum payouts, helped to maintain a solid and balanced incentive structure.
At the end of the fiscal year, each named executive officer is evaluated on a scale of 1 through 4 for each Performance Goal. Level “2” is the expected rating based on achieving aggressive goals or standards, with a level “3” rating assigned to those named executive officers that significantly exceed expectations and a level “4” rating being very difficult to achieve. Each Performance Goal is also assigned a sub-weight (within the overall 70%), with revenue generally carrying the plurality of the weight between 20% and 40%, depending on the named executive officer, and non-revenue goals carrying the remaining 60% to 80% of the weight. After evaluations are finalized, a weighted average of the Performance Goals is calculated (the “Weighted Average Performance Rating”), which is on a scale of 1 to 4 for the named executive officer. The Performance Goals are shown below.
• | Mr. Minogue’s Performance Goals were (i) revenue, (ii) new product development and customer satisfaction, (iii) business development and stakeholder engagement, (iv) TSR and (v) clinical evidence generation in support of improved patient outcomes. |
• | Mr. Trapp’s Performance Goals were (i) revenue, (ii) operating management and forecasting, (iii) investor relations and TSR, (iv) delivering automation and simplification products and (v) human capital. |
• | Mr. Greenfield’s Performance Goals were (i) revenue, (ii) stakeholder engagement, (iii) clinical evidence generation and (iv) reimbursement in major markets. |
• | Dr. Weber’s Performance Goals were (i) revenue, (ii) regulatory approvals, (iii) stakeholder engagement, (iv) customer satisfaction and (v) clinical evidence generation in support of improved patient outcomes. |
• | Mr. Began’s Performance Goals were (i) revenue, (ii) business development, (iii) protection and promotion of innovation by strengthening intellectual property, (iv) ensuring compliance and defending the Company in legal proceedings and (v) corporate affairs, stakeholder engagement and human capital. |
The Leadership Factors of our named executive officers, other than our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, are established by our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation Committee. The Board determines and approves these factors as they apply to our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, based on the Compensation Committee’s recommendations. We apply the same factors to all named executive officers, and believe that the factors promote ethical behavior in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, while encouraging named executive officers to comply with our robust standards of corporate culture and to develop their substantive knowledge and leadership skills.
Leadership Factor | Description | |
Professional competency | Knowledge of area of expertise and dedication to continuing advancement of level of knowledge.
| |
Work ethic | Commitment and dedication to organization on consistent basis.
| |
Flexibility/attitude | Adaptability to changing priorities and tasks, and cooperation within function and Company.
| |
Leadership (formal and informal) | Ability to manage, motivate and influence others toward Company-wide objectives and beyond such stated goals and objectives.
| |
Honor and integrity | Example for others with respect to Company values and commitment to high standards of excellence, integrity and conduct.
| |
Commitment to Company’s Code of Conduct | Firm commitment to standards. See “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Code of Conduct.”
|
45
Table of Contents
Each named executive officer receives an evaluation on a 1-to-4 scale of his overall achievement against the Leadership Factors (the “Leadership Rating”). The Leadership Rating represented a key part of the 2021 Annual Incentive Plan, assessed based on an objective review of actions and behaviors exhibited throughout fiscal 2021 by the named executive officer in question, and was not used to make discretionary upward adjustments to a named executive officer’s Weighted Average Performance Rating.
Calculation of Payouts
To determine the annual cash incentive award payout for each named executive officer, we calculate the weighted average of the officer’s Weighted Average Performance Rating and Leadership Rating (with the Weighed Average Performance Rating representing 70% of the overall rating and the Leadership Rating representing 30% of the overall rating). The named executive officer’s overall rating of 1 to 4 then translates to a defined bonus payout (as a percentage of target bonus). According to the terms of the Annual Incentive Plan, an overall rating of 4 would have resulted in a payout of approximately 150% to 200% of award target, a rating of 3 would have resulted in a payout of approximately 125% to 150% of award target, a rating of 2 would have resulted in a payout of approximately 100% to 125% of award target and a rating of 1 would have resulted in no payout.
Cash incentive award payouts for named executive officers, other than the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, are recommended by the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation Committee. The Board analyzes and approves the actual cash incentive payouts for the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, based on the Compensation Committee’s recommendations. Since overall ratings are tied to payouts within a range, the Compensation Committee (with respect to the named executive officers other than the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) and the Board (with respect to the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) possess discretion whether to pay out awards at the upper or low end of each applicable range.
As part of our pay-for-performance culture, the Company has consistently set aggressive and difficult-to-achieve goals, which the Company believes have led to it historically outperforming its Peer Group. In assigning overall ratings (between 1 and 4), the Compensation Committee and/or Board considered, in addition to our fiscal 2021 revenue of $848 million, the following factors:
• | for Mr. Minogue, achieving top-line growth in a challenging environment, demonstrating strategic leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure continuity of the business while protecting human capital and ensuring employee safety, the Company’s product expansion, driving our continued strong TSR (as discussed above in “—Executive Summary”) and achieving successful execution of clinical trials; |
• | for Mr. Trapp, executing enterprise-wide systems for internal business operations, driving our continued strong TSR, overseeing financial operations which resulted in a 27.1% operating margin, and maintaining human capital by ensuring employee safety and well-being in light of the COVID-19 pandemic; |
• | for Mr. Greenfield, achieving top-line growth in a challenging environment, securing the Company’s position as a key opinion leader in heart recovery by maintaining a strong presence at healthcare conferences, achieving successful clinical results for Impella products and maintaining strong reimbursement of our products; |
• | for Dr. Weber, achieving FDA product clearances, securing the Company’s position as a key opinion leader in heart recovery, facilitating the roll-out of smaller, smarter connected products and achieving successful execution of clinical trials; and |
• | for Mr. Began, providing leadership in business development, bolstering the Company’s intellectual property portfolio with more than 1,000 patents worldwide, protecting human capital by development of on-site COVID-19 testing capabilities and improving the Company’s response to investor feedback related to corporate governance. |
The annual cash incentive payouts for fiscal 2021 for our named executive officers were as follows: for Mr. Minogue, $1,948,044 (representing 130% of target); for Mr. Trapp, $327,600 (representing 105% of target); for Mr. Greenfield,
46
Table of Contents
$328,095 (representing 130% of target); for Dr. Weber, $394,988 (representing 105% of target); and for Mr. Began, $326,081 (representing 155% of target).
Fiscal 2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards
We offer equity incentives to employees to foster a culture of ownership, align compensation with stockholder interests and promote long-term retention and affiliation with the Company. Each year, the Compensation Committee determines the types and sizes of awards to be used for delivering such incentives. In doing so, the Compensation Committee considers the ability of each type of award to achieve key compensation objectives (such as retention, motivation and attraction), the needs of the business, competitive market practices, dilution and expense constraints, as well as tax and accounting implications. The Compensation Committee sets and approves the size, mix and terms of awards for all named executive officers, other than our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, for which it makes recommendations to our Board for the Board’s approval.
Grants of Fiscal 2021 Annual Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards
Below is a summary of the annual long-term incentive vehicles awarded to our named executive officers in fiscal 2021. These long-term incentive awards reflect those made in the ordinary course of business, and do not include the COVID-19 recovery grants discussed further below.
Element
| Purpose
| Key Features
| ||
Stock options |
Incentivize long-term value creation and continued stock price growth |
• Three-year ratable vesting
• Ten-year term
| ||
Performance-based PSUs (PSUs) |
Incentivize continued focus on short- and long-term performance |
• Three-year performance period tied to challenging relative TSR and business operational targets
| ||
Time-based RSUs (RSUs) |
Retain key talent |
• Three-year ratable vesting
|
Although the mix of long-term equity incentives awarded to each named executive officer can vary from year-to-year, the Compensation Committee typically seeks to ensure that PSUs represent the largest proportion of any named executive officer’s annual long-term equity incentive compensation. In determining or recommending to the Board the size of the stock option, PSU and RSU grants for fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed market data, past financial performance and current corporate goals. For fiscal 2021, we re-introduced for each named executive officer RSUs to compose approximately 30% of the officer’s total equity pay mix, with PSUs continuing to make up the largest portion at approximately 50% (assuming a value at target) and options the remaining approximate 20%. The accompanying pie chart and table show the mix and amounts of annual long-term equity incentive awards granted to each named executive officer in fiscal 2021, based on the grant date fair values (assuming a value for PSUs at target), as decided by our Compensation Committee as part of its on-cycle equity grants. |
NEO EQUITY COMPENSATION MIX FISCAL 2021 (EXCLUDING COVID-19 RECOVERY GRANT)
|
47
Table of Contents
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER | AMOUNTS GRANTED | |||||||
Number of Stock Options Granted | Number of RSUs Granted | Number of PSUs Granted (at Target) | Grant Date Fair Value of All Awards Granted(1) | |||||
Michael R. Minogue | 20,898 | 10,567 | 17,612 | $9,013,913 | ||||
Todd A. Trapp | 6,530 | 3,500 | 5,200 | $2,774,208 | ||||
Andrew J. Greenfield | 4,896 | 2,476 | 4,300 | $2,161,592 | ||||
David M. Weber | 5,000 | 3,033 | 4,056 | $2,224,527 | ||||
Marc A. Began | 5,125 | 3,254 | 4,400 | $2,382,036 |
(1) | Includes grant date fair values of stock option, RSU and PSU awards. For PSU awards, values assume a payout at the probable outcome level (i.e., target). For valuation assumptions, please see footnotes 1 and 2 to the Summary Compensation Table. |
For fiscal 2021, due to investor feedback (including the results of our fiscal 2019 “say-on-pay” vote) and the input of our independent compensation consultant, we made certain key changes to our annual PSU awards. We replaced revenue as the sole metric in prior year awards with a relative TSR metric, which measures TSR relative to our Peer Group, and several business operational metrics. As we strive to align the interests of our management and stockholders and use compensation as a way to continue enhancing stockholder value, we believe relative TSR represents a highly effective quantitative performance measure, alongside business operational metrics promoting our long-term business plan.
The relative TSR metric carries a weight of 50% of total payout, with the business operational metrics carrying the aggregate remaining 50% weight. 25% of PSUs will be earned based on the achievement of relative TSR goals during a two-year performance period following grant. The remainder of the PSUs will be earned based on a combination of the achievement of the Relative TSR goals (subject, in each case, to linear interpolation) and the achievement of the business operational goals during a three-year performance period following grant. For the 75% of PSUs earnable after the three-year performance period, 25% will be based on relative TSR goals and 50% will be based on business operational goals. The earned portions of the PSUs will vest immediately on the same date they are earned.
With respect to the PSUs that may be earned for relative TSR performance, the Compensation Committee and, with respect to Mr. Minogue’s compensation, the Board of Directors set very challenging goals in order to reinforce the alignment of management’s interests with those of stockholders. A maximum payout of 200% of target requires outstanding performance within our Peer Group, with a relative TSR during the applicable performance period above the 90th percentile. Additionally, if our absolute TSR is negative, PSU payouts will be capped at target, regardless of our relative TSR within our Peer Group. There will also be no payout under the relative TSR metric if our relative TSR during the applicable performance is below the 25th percentile. A relative TSR at the 25th percentile during the applicable performance period will lead to a payout of 50% of target and a relative TSR at the 50th percentile during the applicable performance period will lead to a payout of target. Regardless of our relative TSR within our Peer Group, if our relative TSR within the S&P 500 is at or above 75th percentile of the S&P 500 during the applicable period, PSUs will be paid out on the relative TSR metric at a minimum of 50% of target.
The remaining 50% of PSUs will be paid out based on the achievement of eight specific business operational goals, each with an equal weighting, over the course of the three-year performance period (with 50% of such amount earned upon achievement of the applicable threshold goal and 200% of such amount earned upon achievement of the applicable maximum goal). The Compensation Committee and, with respect to Mr. Minogue’s compensation, the Board of Directors included these metrics to align our PSUs more closely with our long-term business plan.
48
Table of Contents
COVID-19 Recovery Grant
In November 2020, we made one-time COVID-19 recovery grants to our NEOs. The Compensation Committee and, with respect to Mr. Minogue’s compensation, the Board of Directors determined to grant these awards in order to align management around a strategic COVID-19 recovery plan developed to create value for stockholders. The Company also considered the performance of its NEOs during the COVID-19 pandemic to date, market data and the input of our independent compensation consultant. We believe these awards, which raised the performance-based composition of our fiscal 2021 compensation to 80% of total equity pay, are consistent with the pay-for-performance culture that has made us successful and our use of compensation to align management’s and stockholders’ interests.
The target number of PSUs granted was 12,000 for our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and 4,500 for each other NEO. The PSUs may be earned based on certain performance milestones after a one-year performance period, and, to the extent earned, will time-vest 50% after the end of the one-year performance period and 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date, in each case, subject to the NEO's continued employment on the vesting and |
NEO EQUITY COMPENSATION MIX FISCAL 2021 (INCLUDING COVID-19 RECOVERY GRANT)
| |
settlement dates. Unlike our annual PSUs, these awards contain a one-year performance period, as they are intended to motivate and reward senior management’s performance in handling immediate issues raised by COVID-19 while still continuing to drive our long-term growth and innovation goals. Payouts under the PSUs are based on a revenue growth metric (representing 30% weight of total payout) and certain other business metrics relating to the pandemic, including human capital (representing 20% weight of total payout), manufacturing (representing 20% weight of total payout), and new product development milestones (representing 30% weight of total payout). PSUs are capped overall at 200% of target for all NEOs other than Mr. Minogue. Additionally, in recognition of his focused leadership of the Company during the pandemic, Mr. Minogue’s earned PSU amount may be multiplied by an additional 125% if the Company achieves certain other strategic business metrics not included in the other NEOs’ PSU grants, for a potential maximum payout of 250% of target. |
Other Elements of Compensation
Benefits and Perquisites
We do not provide excessive benefits or perquisites to our executive officers. We provide them with matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, which are available to substantially all of our employees. We also provide life insurance and long-term disability insurance premiums, which represent typical elements of executive compensation. In addition, our named executive officers are entitled to certain benefits in connection with certain terminations of employment and/or in connection with a change of control, as further described in “Narrative Supplement to Compensation Tables—Change of Control Agreements with Named Executive Officers.”
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) places a limit of $1 million per year on the amount of compensation paid to certain of our executive officers that the Company may deduct for federal income tax purposes.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017 (the “Tax Reform Law”), substantially modified Section 162(m) by, among other things, eliminating the exception for performance-based compensation to the $1 million deduction limit effective as of January 1, 2018. As a result, beginning in 2018, we generally expect that compensation paid to each of our named executive officers in excess of $1 million is nondeductible, whether or not it is performance-based.
49
Table of Contents
The Compensation Committee intends to continue to maintain flexibility and the ability to pay competitive compensation by not requiring all compensation to be deductible. The Tax Reform Law also includes a transition rule under which the changes to Section 162(m) described above will not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and is not subsequently materially modified. To the extent applicable to our existing contracts and awards, the Compensation Committee may choose to avail itself of the transition rule. However, due to uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of the transition rule, no assurances can be given at this time that our existing plans and previously-granted awards, even if in place on November 2, 2017, will meet the requirements of the transition rule. Regardless of any changes in law, the Compensation Committee intends to continue to implement compensation programs that it believes are competitive and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
No New Tax Gross-ups
In May 2015, the Compensation Committee adopted a policy not to provide tax gross-ups under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code in any new employment agreements.
Managing Compensation-Related Risks
The Compensation Committee reviews the risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies and practices to determine whether any risks associated with such policies and practices encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking or are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee also oversees an annual review of the Company’s risk assessment of its compensation policies and practices for its employees. The risk-mitigating features that the Company has adopted within our executive compensation programs are summarized below.
Claw-back Policy
We maintain a robust recoupment (or “claw-back”) policy covering each of our executive officers. The policy provides that if the Company is required to restate its financial results due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the securities laws, the Compensation Committee may seek reimbursement of any cash- or equity-based bonus/other incentive compensation (including vested and unvested equity) paid or awarded to the executive officer or effect cancellation of previously-granted equity awards to the extent the compensation was based on erroneous financial data and exceeded what would have been paid to the executive officer under the restatement. Under our award agreements, we may also recover from executive officer grantees compensation in connection with the grantee’s breach of a non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality or similar covenant or agreement.
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies
Our policies prohibit, without exception, all executive officers, employees and directors from hedging their ownership of our securities, engaging in short sales with respect to our securities or pledging our securities.
Double-Trigger Vesting Arrangements
Our RSU and option equity award agreements for recent and new grants to our NEOs contain double-trigger vesting arrangements upon a change of control. Additionally, our PSU equity award agreements for recent and new grants to our NEOs contain double-trigger vesting arrangements upon a change of control, provided the acquirer assumes the PSU awards and the grantee is terminated within one or two years after the change of control.
NEO Stock Ownership Guidelines and Share Retention Requirements
We maintain stock ownership guidelines intended to align further the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders. The guidelines require covered roles to hold common stock (including common stock held in trust, by certain family members or in the Company’s 401(k) plan and stock underlying unvested RSUs or restricted stock awards, but excluding stock underlying options or stock appreciation rights and unvested or unearned PSUs or other performance stock awards) worth a value expressed as a multiple of their salary. We regularly review our ownership guidelines to ensure that they align with peer group norms and governance best practices and that they remain appropriate in light of our annual equity award levels. In fiscal 2021, we amended our guidelines, including the required share ownership amounts, to bring them more in line with market norms.
50
Table of Contents
Each of our NEOs is required to meet these ownership levels by five years after his initial designation as an executive officer of the Company. Until reaching the required ownership level, NEOs are required to retain at least 50% of the shares, net of applicable tax withholding and the payment of any exercise or purchase price (if applicable), received upon the vesting or settlement of equity awards or the exercise of stock options. As of March 31, 2021, all of our NEOs had timely met the stock ownership requirement.
Role | Share Ownership Guideline | Compliance(1) | ||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | 6.00 | |||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 4.00 | |||
Other Executive Officers | 3.00 |
(1) | Based on salary and fair market value of counted equity as of March 31, 2021. |
In May 2021, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual executive compensation review. As part of this review, the Compensation Committee made fiscal 2022 compensation decisions for our named executive officers and recommended the compensation of our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer to the Board, which then met to approve his fiscal 2022 compensation. The Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, our strategic plans for growth and expansion, our corporate performance and our NEOs’ individual performance, market data and the input of Willis Towers Watson.
As in prior years, PSUs continue to make up the largest portion of fiscal 2022 total long-term equity incentive mix, with further “at risk” compensation in the form of options, and RSUs composing the remainder of the mix. The fiscal 2022 grant date fair values of all equity compensation for our NEOs were also reduced compared to those in fiscal 2021, including by approximately 25% for our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Consistent with the reforms made to our executive pay program in fiscal 2021, fiscal 2022 PSUs will be earned and vest after a single three-year period based on revenue growth and relative TSR goals, and will be capped at a maximum payout of 250% of target payout, unless absolute TSR is negative, in which case they will be capped at 200% of target. The relative TSR metric is based only on performance within our Peer Group, and does not contain a modifier based on our TSR relative to the S&P 500.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the contents of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above. Based on its review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s 2021 Annual Report.
Compensation Committee
By: | Paul G. Thomas (Chair) |
Martin P. Sutter |
Jeannine M. Rivet |
51
Table of Contents
The following Summary Compensation Table provides a summary of all compensation required to be reported and earned with respect to fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019 by our named executive officers.
Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary($) | Stock Awards ($)(1)(5) | Option Awards ($)(2)(5) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | |||||||
Michael R. Minogue | 2021 | 608,363 | 10,672,356 | 1,610,358 | 1,948,044 | 9,126 | 14,848,247 | |||||||
Chairman of the Board, President, | 2020 | 768,459 | 10,122,820 | 4,813,414 | 899,097 | 8,976 | 16,612,766 | |||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2019 | 753,391 | 12,605,010 | 4,259,979 | 1,616,024 | 8,826 | 19,243,230 | |||||||
Todd A. Trapp | 2021 | 430,000 | 3,496,819 | 503,189 | 327,600 | 9,126 | 4,766,734 | |||||||
Vice President and Chief | 2020 | 480,000 | 1,598,340 | 673,878 | 312,000 | 8,976 | 3,073,194 | |||||||
Financial Officer | 2019 | 480,000 | 2,372,706 | — | 343,200 | 2,232 | 3,198,138 | |||||||
Andrew J. Greenfield | 2021 | 301,454 | 3,010,116 | 377,276 | 328,095 | 9,126 | 4,026,067 | |||||||
Vice President and Chief | 2020 | 336,507 | 1,598,340 | 673,878 | 201,904 | 8,976 | 2,819,605 | |||||||
Commercial Officer | 2019 | 329,909 | 1,680,668 | 567,997 | 272,175 | 8,826 | 2,859,575 | |||||||
David M. Weber | 2021 | 350,363 | 3,065,037 | 385,290 | 394,988 | 9,126 | 4,204,804 | |||||||
Senior Vice President and | 2020 | 442,564 | 1,331,950 | 577,610 | 300,943 | 8,976 | 2,662,043 | |||||||
Chief Operating Officer | 2019 | 433,886 | 2,635,593 | 922,995 | 405,683 | 8,826 | 4,406,983 | |||||||
Marc A. Began | 2021 | 342,656 | 3,212,914 | 394,922 | 326,081 | 9,126 | 4,285,699 | |||||||
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
(1) | Amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of PSUs and time-based RSUs made to the named executive officer in the applicable fiscal year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The underlying valuation assumptions are discussed in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, included in our 2021 Annual Report. As required by SEC rules, stock awards are reported in the year of grant. For fiscal 2021, fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, the grant date fair value of PSUs as reported assumed performance at the target payout level. As required by SEC rules, the grant date fair value of the PSUs at the maximum payout levels in fiscal 2021 for each named executive officer is as follows: for Mr. Minogue, $18,247,209; for Mr. Trapp; $5,426,338; for Mr. Greenfield, $4,911,480; for Dr. Weber, $4,771,896; and Mr. Began, $4,968,686. For more information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Fiscal 2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” |
(2) | Amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards made to the named executive officer, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes value on the grant date. As required by SEC rules, awards are reported in the year of grant. The underlying valuation assumptions are discussed in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, included in our 2021 Annual Report. |
(3) | Reflects amounts that were earned under our annual cash incentive plan for fiscal 2021, fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019 performance and that were determined and paid during the first quarter of each following fiscal year. |
(4) | Includes the following for the relevant fiscal years: (a) 401(k) contributions by the Company, which were (i) for Mr. Minogue, $8,550 in 2021, $8,400 in 2020 and $8,250 in 2019; (ii) for Mr. Trapp, $8,550 in 2021, $8,400 in 2020 and $1,800 in 2019, (iii) for Mr. Greenfield, $8,550 in 2021, $8,400 in 2020 and $8,250 in 2019, (iv) for Dr. Weber, $8,550 in 2021, $8,400 in 2020 and $8,250 in 2019 and (v) for Mr. Began, $8,550 in 2021; and (b) life insurance premium payments by the Company, which were, for all reported years for all named executive officers $576, except that Mr. Trapp received $432 in 2019. |
(5) | Pursuant to SEC rules, the Summary Compensation Table reflects the grant date values of all equity awards. As disclosed in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the total compensation actually paid to our NEOs was significantly lower, due to the realizable value of equity awards (PSUs and options) granted in fiscal 2020. Due to the Company’s robust pay-for-performance culture and the challenging nature of the performance targets, no PSUs granted in fiscal 2020 were actually earned, and there was a payout of zero PSUs for all NEOs. All options granted to NEOs in fiscal 2020 were underwater as of March 31, 2020, based on the difference between their $266.39 exercise price and the $145.16 closing price of the Company’s common stock on such date. As a result, the realizable value of all stock awards and option awards granted in fiscal 2020 was zero, and the total compensation, including realizable value of equity awards, was as follows for those NEOs whose compensation was reported for fiscal 2020: for Mr. Minogue, $1,676,532; for Mr. Trapp, $800,976; for Mr. Greenfield, $547,387; and for Dr. Weber, $752,483. |
52
Table of Contents
The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to the named executive officers during fiscal 2021.
Grant Date (1) | Estimated Future Payouts
| Estimated Future Payouts
| All Other Stock (#) (4) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) (5) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair (6) | ||||||||||||||
Name | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||
Michael R. Minogue | 5/29/2020 | 1,498,495 | 2,996,990 | |||||||||||||||||
| 5/29/2020 | n/a | 17,612 | 35,224 | 5,037,604 | |||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 10,567 | 2,365,951 | ||||||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 20,898 | 223.9 | 1,610,358 | |||||||||||||||||
11/5/2020 | 6,000 | 12,000 | 30,000 | 3,268,800 | ||||||||||||||||
Todd A. Trapp | 5/29/2020 | 312,000 | 624,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| 5/29/2020 | n/a | 5,200 | 10,400 | 1,487,369 | |||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 3,500 | 783,650 | ||||||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 6,530 | 223.9 | 503,189 | |||||||||||||||||
11/5/2020 | 2,225 | 4,500 | 9,000 | 1,225,800 | ||||||||||||||||
Andrew J. Greenfield | 5/29/2020 | 252,380 | 504,761 | |||||||||||||||||
| 5/29/2020 | n/a | 4,300 | 8,600 | 1,229,940 | |||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 2,476 | 554,376 | ||||||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 4,896 | 223.9 | 377,276 | |||||||||||||||||
11/5/2020 | 2,225 | 4,500 | 9,000 | 1,225,800 | ||||||||||||||||
David M. Weber | 5/29/2020 | 376,179 | 752,359 | |||||||||||||||||
| 5/29/2020 | n/a | 4,056 | 8,112 | 1,160,148 | |||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 3,033 | 679,089 | ||||||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 5,000 | 223.9 | 385,290 | |||||||||||||||||
11/5/2020 | 2,225 | 4,500 | 9,000 | 1,225,800 | ||||||||||||||||
Marc A. Began | 5/29/2020 | 191,250 | 382,500 | |||||||||||||||||
| 5/29/2020 | n/a | 4,400 | 8,800 | 1,258,543 | |||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 3,254 | 728,571 | ||||||||||||||||||
5/29/2020 | 5,125 | 223.9 | 394,922 | |||||||||||||||||
11/5/2020 | 2,225 | 4,500 | 9,000 | 1,225,800 |
(1) | Reflects the dates on which the Compensation Committee approved the target fiscal 2021 annual cash incentive awards or the grants of PSUs, time-based RSUs or stock options, as applicable. No named executive officer paid any amount to us in consideration for the grant of any PSUs, time-based RSUs or stock options. |
(2) | Represents potential target and maximum cash payouts set at the beginning of the fiscal year under our fiscal 2021 Annual Incentive Plan. There are no threshold cash payout levels under the fiscal 2021 Annual Incentive Plan. The amounts actually paid with respect to fiscal 2021 are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” For information on the formula and/or criteria used to determine the amounts paid under these fiscal 2021 grants, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Fiscal 2021 Annual Incentive Plan.” |
(3) | The grants to each named officer represent shares of our common stock subject to PSUs granted under our 2015 Plan, eligible to be earned based on the achievement of certain goals, and, in the case of the COVID-19 recovery grants made on November 5, 2020, subject to time-based vesting once earned. There are no threshold payout levels under the annual PSU grants made on May 29, 2020. For information on the performance conditions used in determining the amounts to be paid out for and the vesting schedule of PSU grants made in fiscal 2021, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Fiscal 2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” |
(4) | Represents shares of our common stock subject to time-based RSU awards granted under our 2015 Plan that are subject to ratable time-based vesting over three years on each anniversary of the date of grant. |
(5) | Represents stock options to purchase shares of our common stock granted under our 2015 Plan that are subject to ratable time-based vesting over three years on each anniversary of the date of grant. |
(6) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. Instead, the amounts shown reflect the grant date fair values of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For stock options, fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes value on the grant date. In calculating these values, we used the assumptions described in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements, included in our 2021 Annual Report. The grant date fair value of PSUs is determined based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions associated with the awards (i.e., target). The actual amount of compensation that may be earned by the named executive officer depends on the extent to which the awards vest and the price of our common stock at the time of exercise or vesting. |
53
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers on March 31, 2021.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name
| Number of
| Number of
| Option
| Option Expiration
| Number of
| Market Value of
| Equity Incentive Plan
| Equity
| ||||||||
Michael R. Minogue | 24,450 | 7,792,949 | 29,612 | 9,438,233 | ||||||||||||
85,000 | — | 23.15 | 5/14/2023 | |||||||||||||
85,000 | — | 21.55 | 5/14/2024 | |||||||||||||
35,000 | — | 66.25 | 5/13/2025 | |||||||||||||
30,500 | — | 99.62 | 5/24/2026 | |||||||||||||
33,000 | — | 134.51 | 5/15/2027 | |||||||||||||
20,000 | 10,000 | 381.97 | 5/16/2028 | |||||||||||||
16,666 | 33,334 | 266.39 | 5/30/2029 | |||||||||||||
20,898 | 223.90 | 5/29/2030 | ||||||||||||||
Todd A. Trapp | 6,293 | 2,005,768 | 9,700 | 3,091,681 | ||||||||||||
2,333 | 4,667 | 266.39 | 5/30/2029 | |||||||||||||
— | 6,530 | 223.90 | 5/29/2030 | |||||||||||||
Andrew J. Greenfield | 5,000 | — | 99.62 | 5/24/2026 | 4,336 | 1,382,013 | 8,800 | 2,804,824 | ||||||||
6,500 | — | 134.51 | 5/15/2027 | |||||||||||||
2,666 | 1,334 | 381.97 | 5/16/2028 | |||||||||||||
2,333 | 4,667 | 266.39 | 5/30/2029 | |||||||||||||
— | 4,896 | 223.90 | 5/29/2030 | |||||||||||||
David M. Weber | 5,923 | 1,877,838 | 8,556 | 2,727,054 | ||||||||||||
13,000 | — | 23.15 | 5/14/2023 | |||||||||||||
10,825 | — | 21.55 | 5/14/2024 | |||||||||||||
10,000 | — | 66.25 | 5/13/2025 | |||||||||||||
7,000 | — | 99.62 | 5/24/2026 | |||||||||||||
8,000 | — | 134.51 | 5/15/2027 | |||||||||||||
4,333 | 2,167 | 381.97 | 5/16/2028 | |||||||||||||
2,000 | 4,000 | 266.39 | 5/30/2029 | |||||||||||||
— | 5,000 | 223.90 | 5/29/2030 | |||||||||||||
Marc. A Began | 3,833 | 1,221,692 | 8,900 | 2,836,697 | ||||||||||||
2,333 | 4,667 | 266.39 | 5/30/2029 | |||||||||||||
— | 5,125 | 223.90 | 5/29/2030 |
(1) | The stock options with an exercise price of $381.97, $266.39 and $223.90 vest in equal installments over three years on each anniversary of the following respective grant dates: May 16, 2018, May 30, 2019 and May 29, 2020. |
(2) | Represents the following number of time-based RSUs, one-third of which were eligible to vest on May 16, 2019 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on May 16, 2020 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on May 16, 2021 (and did vest), subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Minogue, 3,667 RSUs; Mr. Greenfield, 467 RSUs; and Dr. Weber, 800 RSUs. Represents the following number of time-based RSUs, one-third of which were eligible to vest on May 29, 2021 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on May 29, 2022, and one-third of which are eligible to vest on May 16, 2023, subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Minogue, 10,567 RSUs; Mr. Trapp, 3,500 RSUs; Mr. Greenfield, 2,476 RSUs; Dr. Weber, 3,033 RSUs; and Mr. Began, 3,254 RSUs. Represents the following number of RSUs that performance vested on fiscal 2019 revenue, one-third of which were eligible to vest on May 16, 2019 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on May 16, 2020 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on May 16, 2021 (and did vest), subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Minogue, 10,216 RSUs; Mr. Trapp, 697 RSUs; Mr. Greenfield, 1,393 RSUs; and Dr. Weber, 2,090 RSUs. Represents the following number of RSUs that based on the achievement of certain performance milestones, all of which are eligible to vest on May 29, 2023, subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Minogue, 8,806 RSUs; Mr. Trapp, 2,600 RSUs; Mr. Greenfield, 2,150 RSUs; Dr. Weber, 2,028 RSUs; and Mr. Began, 2,200 RSUs. Represents the following number of RSUs that based on the achievement of TSR metrics, all of which are eligible to vest on May 29, 2023, subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Minogue, 4,403 RSUs; Mr. Trapp, 1,300 RSUs; Mr. Greenfield, 1,075 RSUs; Dr. Weber, 1,014 RSUs; and Mr. Began, 1,100 RSUs. Represents the following number of RSUs that based on the achievement of TSR metrics, all of which are eligible to vest on May 29, 2022, subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Minogue, 4,403 RSUs; Mr. Trapp, 1,300 RSUs; Mr. Greenfield, 1,075 RSUs; Dr. Weber, 1,014 RSUs; and Mr. Began, 1,100 RSUs. Represents the following number of time-based RSUs, one-third of which were eligible to vest on April 9, 2019 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on April 9, 2020 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on April 9, 2021 (and did vest), subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Trapp, 2,096 RSUs. Represents the following number of time-based RSUs, one-third of which were eligible to vest on July 23, 2019 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on July 23, 2020 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on July 23, 2021, subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Began, 237 RSUs. Represents the following number of time-based RSUs, one-third of which were eligible to vest on November 6, 2019 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on November 6, 2020 (and did vest), and one-third of which are eligible to vest on November 6, 2021, subject to the executive’s continued employment through each such date: Mr. Began, 342 RSUs. |
(3) | The market value of unvested shares of RSUs or unearned/unvested PSUs is based on $318.73, the closing market price of our common stock on March 31, 2021, the last trading day of fiscal 2021. |
(4) | Pursuant to SEC rules, represents the number of PSUs that were eligible to performance vest at the target performance level based on fiscal 2021 performance. |
54
Table of Contents
Option Exercises and Vesting of Stock
The following table provides information regarding the exercise of stock options by our named executive officers and shares acquired upon the vesting of RSU and PSU stock awards held by them during fiscal 2021.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | ||||
Michael R. Minogue | 100,000 | 28,667,962 | 37,630 | 6,943,103 | ||||
Todd A. Trapp | — | — | 2,792 | 456,246 | ||||
Andrew J. Greenfield | 10,000 | 2,996,000 | 5,794 | 1,068,869 | ||||
David M. Weber | — | — | 6,556 | 1,209,952 | ||||
Marc A. Began | — | — | 578 | 163,317 |
(1) | The value realized on exercise of stock option awards is based on the difference between the average weighted price at which the shares of common stock were sold on the date of exercise of the stock option award and the exercise price of the stock option. |
(2) | The value realized on vesting of stock awards granted is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date prior to vesting. |
Narrative Supplement to Compensation Tables
Employment Arrangements with our Named Executive Officers
Michael R. Minogue
On April 5, 2004, we entered into an employment agreement with Michael R. Minogue in which we agreed to employ him as our President and Chief Executive Officer. At that time, the Company’s market capitalization was $193 million, which is 71 times lower than its market capitalization as of June 2021. The agreement initially provided for an annual base salary of $325,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, and a target bonus for such fiscal year of up to $325,000. Mr. Minogue’s employment agreement also provides that our Compensation Committee will review Mr. Minogue’s base salary and target bonus on an annual basis. In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Minogue was granted stock options to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock on his date of hire. The agreement also provides for, among other things, certain vacation, life insurance and other benefits to Mr. Minogue. The employment agreement has an indefinite term and is terminable by either party upon notice to the other.
Todd A. Trapp
On March 30, 2018, Todd A. Trapp accepted our offer letter to become our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The letter initially provided for an annual base salary of $480,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020, and a target bonus for such fiscal year of up to $312,000. Mr. Trapp’s offer letter also provides that our Compensation Committee will review Mr. Trapp’s base salary and target bonus on an annual basis. In addition, pursuant to the letter, Mr. Trapp was granted PSUs and RSUs with an expected value of $1,800,000 shortly following his start date and was entitled to receive additional stock awards with an expected value of $850,000 in fiscal 2021. The stock awards vest in three equal annual installments on each anniversary of the date of grant. The letter also provides for, among other things, certain vacation, life insurance and other benefits to Mr. Trapp.
Andrew J. Greenfield
On December 31, 2004, Mr. Greenfield accepted our offer letter to become our Vice President, Healthcare Solutions. The offer letter provided that Mr. Greenfield would receive a starting base salary of $150,000 per year and a sign-on bonus of $60,000. The offer letter provided for the grant to Mr. Greenfield of a stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock on his date of hire, vesting annually over four years. In addition, Mr. Greenfield was eligible for an annual cash incentive award with a target payout of $50,000. Mr. Greenfield is currently our Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer.
55
Table of Contents
David M. Weber
On April 10, 2007, Dr. Weber accepted our offer letter to become our Chief Operating Officer. The offer letter provided that Dr. Weber would receive a starting salary of $250,000 per year and a signing bonus of $12,000. The offer letter provided for the grant to Dr. Weber of a stock option to purchase 130,000 shares of our common stock on his date of hire, vesting annually over four years. In addition, Dr. Weber was eligible for an annual cash incentive award with a target payout of $100,000 under the offer letter. Dr. Weber is currently our Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
Marc A. Began
On November 1, 2018, Mr. Began accepted our offer letter to become our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. The offer letter provided that Began would receive a starting base salary of $375,000 per year. The offer letter provided for the grant to Mr. Began in the form of RSUs with an expected value of $400,000 with a grant date of November 5, 2018, vesting annually over three years. In addition, Mr. Began was eligible for an annual cash incentive award with a target payout of $168,750. The agreement also provides for, among other things, certain vacation and other benefits to Mr. Began.
Additionally, each of our named executive officers that signed an offer letter rather than an individualized employment agreement (Mr. Trapp, Dr. Weber, Mr. Greenfield and Mr. Began) entered into our standard nondisclosure and noncompetition agreement, which contains provisions on the handling of proprietary information and assignment of inventions, as well as restrictions on competition and solicitation during the period of employment and for two years after termination. In addition, the agreements provide that, as the executive officer is employed at will, we may terminate him with or without cause, but in the case of a termination without cause more than six months after the date employment begins, we are required to provide 28 days’ prior notice.
Change of Control Agreements with Named Executive Officers
Michael R. Minogue
We entered into a change of control agreement with Mr. Minogue when he began employment with us in April 2004. The agreement was entered into in order to provide Mr. Minogue with a sense of job security and the ability to focus on his work regardless of any impending change of control. In April 2004, the Company had a market capitalization of $193 million, which is 71 times lower than its market capitalization as of June 2021, and the terms of Mr. Minogue’s agreement reflect the significant risks associated with assuming leadership of the Company at that time. The agreement specifically provides that, following a change of control, we will continue to employ Mr. Minogue for 24 full months in the same or a similar position at an annual base salary equal to at least 12 times the highest monthly base salary received within the last 12 months prior to the change of control and an annual cash incentive award equal to his average cash award over the last three fiscal years. In addition, Mr. Minogue agreed to remain our employee for six months following a change of control. If Mr. Minogue is still employed at the end of this six-month period following a change of control, all unvested stock options and stock appreciation rights held by him will become vested. Mr. Minogue can terminate his employment for good reason, and we may terminate his employment for or without cause. The agreement provides for certain payments to be made to Mr. Minogue or his family upon certain circumstances following a change of control, including upon his death, disability, termination of employment by us without cause, and termination of employment by him for good reason.
If we terminate Mr. Minogue’s employment without cause, or Mr. Minogue terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to receive cash severance payments equal to 2.99 times his base amount (as defined in Section 280(G)(b)(3) of the Code). For up to 18 months following any such termination, we are also required to provide for continuation of certain benefits provided to Mr. Minogue before the change of control on terms at least as favorable to Mr. Minogue as in effect before the change of control. These payments and benefits are described in more detail below. Additionally, upon such a termination, the vesting of all of Mr. Minogue’s then-unvested and outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights will accelerate. In the event that Mr. Minogue is obligated to pay any excise or payroll-related taxes, including interest and penalties, under Section 4999 of the Code, Mr. Minogue will be entitled to receive a “gross-up” payment such that he will receive an after-tax amount sufficient to enable him to pay all such excise taxes, interest and penalties.
56
Table of Contents
Todd A. Trapp
We entered into a change of control severance agreement with Todd A. Trapp on April 6, 2018, when he became our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The agreement provides that if, within two years from the date of the consummation of a change of control, we terminate Mr. Trapp without “cause” (other than in connection with the sale of some or all of the assets of the Company) or Mr. Trapp terminates his employment for “good reason,” we must pay certain severance and other benefits. These severance and benefits payments include: (i) base salary continuation payments for 24 months following the date of termination; (ii) provided Mr. Trapp makes a timely election for COBRA coverage, reimbursement for medical insurance premiums for 24 months following the termination date, unless Mr. Trapp earlier receives medical coverage through another employer; (iii) reasonable outplacement assistance with an aggregate cost of up to $10,000; and (iv) accelerated vesting of all outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock held by Mr. Trapp as of his termination date.
If, in connection with a change of control, the Board or the Compensation Committee elects to cancel outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights or RSUs, any stock options and stock appreciation rights held by Mr. Trapp will accelerate and become exercisable 10 days prior to the change of control, and all RSUs held by Mr. Trapp will accelerate and vest immediately prior to the change of control.
Andrew J. Greenfield
We entered into a change of control severance agreement with Andrew J. Greenfield in September 2008. The agreement provides that, following a change of control, the Company will continue to employ Mr. Greenfield for two years with a position (including status, offices, titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties and responsibilities that are at least commensurate in all material respects with the most significant of those held by Mr. Greenfield during the 180-day period immediately prior to such change of control, at the location where he was employed immediately prior to the change of control or within 35 miles from such location. During this period, we will also be obligated to pay: (i) annual base salary equal to at least 12 times the highest monthly base salary paid or payable to Mr. Greenfield within the 12-month period prior to the month in which the change of control occurs, (ii) annual cash bonus at least equal to his target bonus for the fiscal year in which the change of control occurs, (iii) entitlement to participate in plans or policies applicable to his peer executives at the Company on terms no less favorable to such benefits provided to Mr. Greenfield during the one-year period prior to the change of control, and (iv) entitlement to reimbursement for reasonable business expenses and fringe and other benefits (including payment of up to $10,000 in outplacement assistance fees upon Mr. Greenfield’s termination without “cause” or his resignation). In addition, Mr. Greenfield agrees to remain employed by the Company for six months following a change of control to assist in the transition caused by the change of control on the same terms described above and with all of the same compensation and benefits described above in accordance with the most favorable plans, practices, policies and programs. If, in connection with a change of control, the Board or the Compensation Committee elects to cancel outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights or RSUs, any unvested stock options and stock appreciation rights held by Mr. Greenfield will accelerate and become exercisable 10 days prior to the change of control, and any unvested RSUs held by Mr. Greenfield will accelerate and vest immediately prior to the change of control.
During the two-year period after a change in control, Mr. Greenfield can terminate his employment for “good reason,” and the Company can terminate his employment for or without cause. The agreement provides for certain payments to be made to Mr. Greenfield or his family upon a qualifying termination during this period or for a termination due to an anticipated change of control. If during this period the Company terminates Mr. Greenfield’s employment without cause, or Mr. Greenfield resigns (other than during the six-month period following a change of control), he will be entitled to receive the following from the Company: (i) a lump-sum cash severance payment equal to two times his annual base salary and target bonus; (ii) continuation of medical and dental benefits on terms at least equal to those in effect before the change of control, which may become secondary benefits if Mr. Greenfield becomes eligible for such benefits under another employer’s plans or may be converted into tax-adjusted payments of an equivalent amount if the plans do not allow for Mr. Greenfield’s continued participation; (iii) reimbursement of up to $10,000 in fees paid for outplacement benefits and any other payments or benefits for which Mr. Greenfield or his family would be eligible and that generally apply to Mr. Greenfield’s peer executives at the Company and their families; and (iv) only if the Company terminates Mr. Greenfield without cause or he resigns for good reason, all remaining unvested stock options or stock appreciation rights will immediately and automatically become exercisable and all RSUs will fully vest. In the event that Mr. Greenfield is obligated to pay any excise taxes, including interest and penalties, under Section 4999 of the Code,
57
Table of Contents
the Company will make a “gross-up” payment to Mr. Greenfield such that he will receive an after-tax amount that equals the total amount of all excise taxes, income taxes, interests and penalties.
David M. Weber
On August 13, 2008, we entered into a change of control agreement with Dr. Weber. Under the change of control agreement, if we terminate Dr. Weber’s employment for any reason other than for cause, death or disability during the two-year period following a change of control, as defined in the change of control agreement, or if the executive terminates his employment with us for good reason during the 18-month period beginning six months after a change of control, Dr. Weber will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of the executive’s then-effective annual base salary plus his target bonus. For up to two years following any such termination, we are also required to provide medical and dental benefits to Dr. Weber and his family. Additionally, upon such a termination, the vesting of all of Dr. Weber’s then-unvested and outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights will accelerate. Upon a change of control, whether or not the executive’s employment terminates, if the Compensation Committee elects to cancel outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights and RSUs, all such awards then outstanding and held by Dr. Weber will accelerate and vest immediately prior to the change of control.
Marc A. Began
We entered into a change of control severance agreement with Marc A. Began on November 1, 2018. The agreement provides that if, within two years from the date of the consummation of a change of control, we terminate Mr. Began without “cause” (other than in connection with the sale of some or all of the assets of the Company) or Mr. Began terminates his employment for “good reason,” we must pay certain severance and other benefits. These severance and benefits payments include: (i) base salary continuation payments for 24 months following the date of termination; (ii) a pro-rated annual target bonus for the calendar year in which such termination occurred, and an amount equal to two times his target bonus as in effect immediately prior to such termination payable in equal installments over the 24 months following such termination; (iii) provided Mr. Began makes a timely election for COBRA coverage, reimbursement for medical insurance premiums for 24 months following the termination date, unless Mr. Began earlier receives medical coverage through another employer; (iii) reasonable outplacement assistance with an aggregate cost of up to $10,000; and (iv) accelerated vesting of all outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights and RSUs held by Mr. Began as of his termination date.
If, in connection with a change of control, the Board or the Compensation Committee elects to cancel outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights and RSUs, any stock options and stock appreciation rights held by Mr. Began will accelerate and become exercisable 10 days prior to the change of control, and all RSUs held by Mr. Began will accelerate and vest immediately prior to the change of control.
58
Table of Contents
Estimated Potential Payments Following a Change of Control
The following table provides information regarding the estimated amounts payable to the individuals named below upon the occurrence of the triggering events described below, in each case assuming that a change of control had occurred on March 31, 2021, the last day of our last fiscal year. The amounts shown as payable upon the triggering events described below do not include amounts earned by the individual and accrued before the occurrence of the triggering event but payable after the triggering event, such as accrued and unpaid salary or the value of accrued but unused vacation days.
Name and Triggering Events Following Change of Control | Severance ($) | Acceleration of Stock Options ($)(1) | Acceleration of RSUs ($)(2) | Acceleration of Performance Units ($)(3) | Benefits Continuation and Outplacement ($) | Tax Reimbursement ($)(4) | Total ($)(5) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michael R. Minogue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automatic acceleration of options and RSUs upon change of control(6) | - | 1,744,702 | 4,424,929 | - | - | - | 6,169,631 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Continues employment for six months(7) | - | 3,726,459 | - | - | - | - | 3,726,459 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by us other than for cause or by executive for good reason(8) | 148,272,148 | 3,726,459 | 7,792,949 | 9,438,233 | 33,397 | 63,310,705 | 232,573,891 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Todd A. Trapp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automatic acceleration of options and RSUs upon a change of control(9) | - | 244,271 | 890,213 | - | - | - | 1,134,484 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by us other than for cause or by executive for good reason(8) | 960,000 | 863,511 | 2,005,768 | 3,091,681 | 47,862 | - | 6,968,822 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew J. Greenfield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automatic acceleration of options and RSUs upon change of control(10) | - | 244,271 | 592,838 | - | - | - | 837,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by us other than for cause or by executive for good reason(8) | 1,177,774 | 708,559 | 1,382,013 | 2,804,824 | 47,682 | - | 6,121,032 | |||||||||||||||||||||
David M. Weber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automatic acceleration of options and RSUs upon change of control(11) | - | 244,271 | 890,213 | - | - | - | 1,134,484 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by us other than for cause or by executive for good reason(8) | 1,637,485 | 683,510 | 1,887,838 | 2,727,054 | 47,862 | - | 6,983,749 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Marc A. Began | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automatic acceleration of options and RSUs upon change of control(12) | - | 244,271 | 592,838 | - | - | - | 837,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by us other than for cause or by executive for good reason(8) | 1,147,500 | 730,275 | 1,221,692 | 2,836,697 | 47,862 | - | 5,984,026 |
(1) | Represents the estimated value of the acceleration of the vesting of stock options held by the executive, assuming a stock price of $318.73, which was the closing market price of our common stock on March 31, 2021. This value is based on the difference between such price and the exercise price of the accelerated stock options. All stock options held by the named executive officers accelerate in full if the executive is terminated following a change of control other than for cause or if the executive terminates employment for good reason. In addition, in the case of Mr. Minogue, all stock options and stock appreciation rights accelerate in full if following a change of control his employment continues for at least six months. In the case of all named executive officers, the stock options will also vest in full if our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee exercises its discretion to cancel outstanding stock options in a change of control. |
(2) | Represents the estimated value of the acceleration of the vesting of certain RSUs held by the executives, assuming a stock price of $318.73, which was the closing market price of our common stock on March 31, 2021. Additional detail about such acceleration is described in the footnotes below. |
(3) | Represents the estimated value of the acceleration of the vesting of certain PSUs (assuming payout at target) held by the executives, assuming a stock price of $318.73, which was the closing market price of our common stock on March 31, 2021. Additional detail about such acceleration is described in the footnotes below. |
(4) | Represents the estimated gross-up payment owed to the executives based on the assumptions in this table. Mr. Minogue is entitled to a full gross-up payment to the extent of any excise tax imposed pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code. The other named executive officers, with the exception of Mr. Trapp and Mr. Began, are entitled to a gross-up payment to the extent that any excise tax is imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, but subject to other limitations on the amount of gross-up for the excise tax. |
(5) | Does not include amounts the executive would be entitled to if his employment was terminated due to death or disability. Each executive or his estate is, upon the executive’s termination due to death or disability, entitled to receive the executive’s earned but unpaid compensation as well as benefits at least equal to the most favorable family benefits provided by the Company to surviving families of peer executives. |
(6) | Reflects the value of all outstanding stock options awards granted to Mr. Minogue on May 16, 2018, May 30, 2019 and May 29, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company (assuming the stock options are not assumed or substituted in the transaction). Reflects the value of all outstanding time-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Minogue on May 16, 2018 and May 29, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. Also reflects the value of performance and time-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Minogue on May 16, 2018, May 29, 2020 and November 5, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. |
(7) | This row does not reflect the value of continued compensation for services rendered during the course of employment or the effect of continued vesting of stock options following a change of control. |
(8) | Assumes that termination occurs on March 31, 2021 and all unvested equity is accelerated and vested. Termination later in the year would also entitle the executive to a pro rata portion of his bonus, based on the number of days lapsed during the year prior to termination. Bonus amounts and severance payments are payable in a lump sum. Benefits continuation consists of the continuation of medical benefits for the executive and his family, which, as of March 31, 2021, |
59
Table of Contents
are payable over a period of 18 months in the case of Mr. Minogue and over 24 months for the other named executive officers. Also includes outplacement of up to $5,000 in the case of Mr. Minogue, and $10,000 in the case of the named executive officers other than Mr. Minogue. Other perquisites and personal benefits are excluded because the estimated aggregate amount of such benefits is less than $10,000 for each named executive officer. |
(9) | Reflects the value of all outstanding stock options awards granted to Mr. Trapp on May 30, 2019 and May 29, 2020, which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. Reflects the value of all outstanding time-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Trapp on April 9, 2018 and May 29, 2020, which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. Also reflects the value of performance and time-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Trapp on May 16, 2018, May 29, 2020 and November 5, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. |
(10) | Reflects the value of all outstanding stock options awards granted to Mr. Greenfield on May 16, 2018 and, May 30, 2019 and May 29, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company (assuming the stock options are not assumed or substituted in the transaction). Reflects the value of all outstanding time-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Greenfield on May 16, 2018 and May 29, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. Also reflects the value of performance and time-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Greenfield on May 16, 2018, May 29, 2020 and November 5, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. |
(11) | Reflects the value of all outstanding stock options awards granted to Dr. Weber on May 16, 2018, and May 30, 2019 and May 29, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company (assuming the stock options are not assumed or substituted in the transaction). Reflects the value of all outstanding time-based RSU awards granted to Dr. Weber on May 16, 2018 and May 29, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. Also reflects the value of performance and time-based RSU awards granted to Dr. Weber on May 16, 2018, May 29, 2020 and November 5, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. |
(12) | Reflects the value of all outstanding stock options awards granted to Mr. Began on May 30, 2019, and May 29, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company (assuming the stock options are not assumed or substituted in the transaction). Reflects the value of all outstanding time-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Began on July 23, 2018, and November 16, 2018 and May 29, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. Also reflects the value of performance and time-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Began on May 29, 2020 and November 5, 2020, each of which by its terms vests in full upon a change of control of the Company. |
60
Table of Contents
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIO
|
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act and related SEC rules, we are required to disclose the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Minogue, the annual total compensation of our employees other than Mr. Minogue and the ratio of these two amounts. For fiscal 2021:
• | The estimated annual total compensation for the median employee of the Company (excluding Mr. Minogue) was $99,165; and |
• | Mr. Minogue’s annual total compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, was $14,848,247. |
Based on this information for fiscal 2021, we estimate that the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Minogue to the median annual total compensation of our employees (other than Mr. Minogue) was approximately 150 to 1.
We believe this pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median of the annual total compensation of our employees and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonable estimates and assumptions regarding their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio for the Company. Unless stated below, we have not applied any such exclusions.
To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and Mr. Minogue, we took the following steps:
• | We determined that, as of January 31, 2021, our employee population consisted of individuals located primarily in the United States, Germany and Japan, including full- and part-time employees. We selected January 31, 2021 as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee” because it enabled us to make such identification in a reasonably efficient and economical manner. |
• | To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we compared the amount of salary and wages of our employees (excluding Mr. Minogue) plus target annual cash bonus figures. |
• | We identified our median employee using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in the calculation. |
• | We combined all of the elements of the median employee’s compensation for fiscal 2021 in accordance with applicable SEC rules (all compensation as would be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table if the employee were a named executive officer), resulting in annual total compensation of $99,165. The difference between such employee’s annual total compensation as used for purposes of determining our median employee and as used for purposes of determining our Chief Executive Officer pay ratio was approximately $5,195, which reflects that, for purposes of determining our Chief Executive Officer pay ratio, the median employee’s annual total compensation included certain benefits. |
• | With respect to the annual total compensation of Mr. Minogue, we used the amount reported in the “Total Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2021. |
61
Table of Contents
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
The following table provides information as of March 31, 2021 regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans. Our equity compensation plans under which awards may currently be granted include the 2015 Plan and our Amended & Restated 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), both of which have been approved by our stockholders.
Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | 1,012,338 | (1) | $ | 141.87 | (2) | 3,452,537 | (3) | |||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||||
Total | 1,012,338 | 3,452,537 |
(1) | Consists of the following amounts under the 2015 Plan: 711,038 shares of common stock underlying outstanding stock options; 301,300 shares of common stock deliverable upon the vesting of outstanding time-vesting RSUs and earned PSUs; and 91,718 shares of common stock deliverable upon the vesting of unearned PSUs at the target payout level (which would have been 189,436 assuming a payout at the maximum level). |
(2) | The weighted-average exercise price only includes all outstanding stock options. |
(3) | Consists of 3,334,890 securities available for future issuance under the 2015 Plan and 117,647 securities available for future issuance under the ESPP. |
62
Table of Contents
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
|
At the close of business on June 14, 2021, there were 45,344,956 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote. The following table provides information, as of June 14, 2021, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:
• | each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of our common stock; |
• | each of our directors and nominees for director; |
• | each of our “named executive officers” listed in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation” above; and |
• | all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. |
The amounts and percentages of shares beneficially owned are reported on the basis of SEC regulations governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under SEC rules, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares voting power or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Securities that can be so acquired are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing such person’s ownership percentage, but not for purposes of computing any other person’s percentage.
This information is based upon information received from or on behalf of the individuals named therein. Unless otherwise noted, the address for each individual is c/o ABIOMED, Inc., 22 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923.
Name(1) | Shares Outstanding Beneficially Owned | Shares Subject to Right to Acquire Within 60 Days(8) | Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Total Outstanding Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||
Five-Percent-or-More Beneficial Owners | ||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2) | 4,801,759 | — | 4,801,759 | 10.6% | ||||
Blackrock, Inc.(3) | 4,127,359 | 4,127,359 | 9.1% | |||||
Baillie Gifford & Co(4) | 3,041,827 | — | 3,041,827 | 6.7% | ||||
Directors and Named Executive Officers(5) | ||||||||
Michael R. Minogue(6) | 504,304 | 338,799 | 843,103 | 1.9% | ||||
Todd A. Trapp | 4,122 | 6,842 | 10,964 | * | ||||
Andrew J. Greenfield(7) | 50,988 | 21,798 | 72,786 | * | ||||
David M. Weber(8) | 147,768 | 47,491 | 195,259 | * | ||||
Marc A. Began | 1,242 | 6,374 | 7,616 | * | ||||
Martin P. Sutter | 168,349 | 661 | 169,010 | * | ||||
Dorothy E. Puhy(9) | 13,543 | 661 | 14,204 | * | ||||
Paul G. Thomas | 6,530 | 661 | 7,191 | * | ||||
Christopher D. Van Gorder | 6,091 | 661 | 6,752 | * | ||||
Jeannine M. Rivet | 7,999 | 661 | 8,660 | * | ||||
Eric A. Rose | 13,814 | 661 | 14,475 | * | ||||
Myron L. Rolle | — | — | — | — | ||||
Paula A. Johnson | — | — | — | — | ||||
All current executive officers and directors as a group (13 persons)(10) | 924,750 | 425,270 | 1,350,020 | 3.0% |
* | Less than one percent. |
(1) | Unless otherwise noted, each person identified possesses sole voting and investment power over the shares listed. |
63
Table of Contents
(2) | Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. on February 10, 2021, in its capacity as investment adviser of various funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to zero shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,601,404 shares, shared voting power with respect to 77,552 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 200,355 shares. The principal business address of The Vanguard Group, Inc. and other reporting persons is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern PA 19355. |
(3) | Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed by Blackrock, Inc. on January 29, 2021. Blackrock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 3,673,447 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,127,359 shares. The principal business address of Blackrock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. |
(4) | Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed by Baillie Gifford & Co on January 20, 2021. Baillie Gifford & Co has sole voting power with respect to 2,808,903 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,041,827 shares. The principal business address of Baillie Gifford & Co is Calton Square, 1 Greenside Row, Edinburgh EH1 3AN, Scotland (UK). |
(5) | Shares are deemed to be beneficially owned due to the individual’s right to acquire the shares upon the exercise of outstanding stock options or vesting of RSUs within 60 days from June 14, 2021 or upon termination of service other than for death, disability or involuntary termination. |
(6) | Based on information provided in a Form 4 filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act on June 2, 2021, shares beneficially owned by Mr. Minogue include 283,365 shares of common stock beneficially owned indirectly through trusts. |
(7) | Based on information provided in a Form 4 filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act on June 2, 2021, shares beneficially owned by Mr. Greenfield include 12,032 shares of common stock beneficially owned indirectly through a trust. |
(8) | Based on information provided in a Form 4 filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act on June 2, 2021, shares beneficially owned by Dr. Weber include 15,497 shares of common stock beneficially owned indirectly through a trust. |
(9) | Based on information provided in a Form 4 filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act on February 3, 2021, shares beneficially owned by Ms. Puhy include 11,335 shares of common stock beneficially owned indirectly through a trust. |
(10) | Includes shares beneficially owned by Michael R. Minogue, Dorothy E. Puhy, Jeannine M. Rivet, Eric A. Rose, Martin P. Sutter, Paul G. Thomas, Christopher D. Van Gorder, Mryon L. Rolle, Paula A. Johnson, Andrew J. Greenfield, Marc A. Began, Todd A. Trapp and David M. Weber. |
64
Table of Contents
|
The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. Pursuant to this charter, the Company’s management is responsible for the financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company’s independent auditors are responsible for auditing those financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with U.S. GAAP. In addition, the independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing and expressing an opinion on the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and review these processes and to oversee the appointment, retention, compensation, review of qualifications and independence, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements, but not to verify independently the information provided to the Audit Committee. A brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included under the heading “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Committees of the Board of Directors—Audit Committee.”
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the audit financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. To oversee management’s testing and evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, the Audit Committee also received periodic updates on this topic provided by management and Deloitte & Touche LLP at each scheduled Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee met with Deloitte & Touche LLP, with and without the Company’s management present, to discuss the overall scope and plan of the audit, the results of the audit and the independent registered public accounting firm’s evaluation of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
The Audit Committee also discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP matters required to be discussed by the applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”). In addition, we received from Deloitte & Touche LLP written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB and discussed these documents with Deloitte & Touche LLP, as well as other matters related to Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence from management and the Company.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, and subject to the limitations on the Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities referred to above and in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in its 2021 Annual Report for filing with the SEC.
Audit Committee
Dorothy E. Puhy (Chair)
Jeannine M. Rivet
Eric A. Rose
65
Table of Contents
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES
|
Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table shows fees for professional audit services, billed to us by Deloitte & Touche LLP, including its affiliates, for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, and fees billed to us by Deloitte & Touche LLP for other services provided during such fiscal years:
Fee Category | Year ended 3/31/2021 | Year ended 3/31/2020 | ||||||
Audit fees | $ | 1,368,765 |
| $ | 1,266,800 |
| ||
Audit-related fees |
| — |
|
| — |
| ||
Tax fees |
| 216,972 |
|
| 78,022 |
| ||
All other fees |
| 2,000 |
|
| 2,000 |
| ||
Total fees | $ | 1,587,737 | $ | 1,346,822 |
Audit fees. Audit fees include fees paid by us to Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with its annual audit of our consolidated financial statements and its reviews of our interim financial statements as reported in our quarterly filings with the SEC. Audit fees also include fees paid by us to Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with its annual audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and its engagements and services associated with the issuance of consents on SEC registration statements.
Audit-related fees. Audit-related fees typically include fees paid by us to Deloitte & Touche LLP for assurance and related services traditionally performed by our independent registered public accounting firm.
Tax fees. Tax fees cover services performed by the tax personnel of Deloitte & Touche LLP, except those services specifically related to the audit of our consolidated financial statements, and include fees for tax compliance, tax planning and advice.
All other fees. All other fees include the aggregate fees recognized for services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP (including our subscription to the firm’s accounting research tool), other than audit, audit-related and tax services.
Our Audit Committee has determined that the services Deloitte & Touche LLP performed for us during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 were at all times compatible with its independence.
Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
Our Audit Committee has the sole authority to approve the scope of the audit and any audit or permitted non-audit services, as well as all audit fees and terms. Our Audit Committee must pre-approve any audit and permitted non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee will not approve the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm to perform any services that the firm would be prohibited from providing under applicable securities laws.
In assessing whether to approve the use of our independent registered public accounting firm for permitted non-audit services, our Audit Committee endeavors to minimize relationships that could appear to impair the objectivity of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority for non-audit services to the Chair of our Audit Committee within the guidelines discussed above. The Chair is required to inform our Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting of each decision to permit our independent registered public accounting firm to perform non-audit services. All audit and other services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP were pre-approved for each of the last two fiscal years.
66
Table of Contents
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
|
We have adopted a written related party transactions policy (the “Related Party Transactions Policy”) pursuant to which all related party transactions, as defined under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market and Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, must receive the approval of the Audit Committee (or, in the event it is inappropriate for the Audit Committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of interest, by other independent directors on our Board). The Related Party Transactions Policy provides that, in approving or rejecting a related party transaction, the Audit Committee may consider all facts and information that are available and deemed relevant by the Audit Committee, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than the terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, as well as the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.
In addition to the Related Party Transaction Policy, the Code of Conduct contains a conflict of interest section prohibiting that specified conflict of interest transactions, including, for example, serving as a director, officer or employee of or consultant to any competitor or any entity that does business with the Company or having a substantial undisclosed direct or indirect interest in any entity that does business with the Company.
Mr. Van Gorder, a member of our Board, is Chief Executive Officer of Scripps Health, which purchases our products and services. We recognized $2.0 million in revenue from Scripps Health during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, which represented less than 1% of our revenues for such year. We expect that Scripps Health will continue to purchase our products in the future. Other than these transactions with Scripps Health, there were no related party transactions in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 as required to be reported under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS
|
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers and directors, as well as persons who own more than 10% of our common stock (“ten-percent stockholders”), file reports of ownership and changes of ownership in our common stock and other equity securities with the SEC.
Based solely on a review of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed with the SEC and on written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal 2021, our directors, executive officers and ten-percent stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements on a timely basis, except for the following due to administrative oversight: one Form 3, filed on behalf of Mr. Began on August 25, 2020 for his designation as an executive officer on August 12, 2020.
|
We maintain an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits officers, directors, employees and contract employees of the Company and its subsidiaries from trading the Company’s securities during quarterly blackout periods and also contains other restrictions on trading activities designed to avoid any circumstance where Company insiders may be deemed to have traded on material nonpublic information. As discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the policy also prohibits insiders (including all executive officers, employees and directors) from hedging their ownership of our securities, engaging in short sales with respect to our securities or pledging our securities.
Other Proposed Action for 2021
Our Board of Directors knows of no other business to come before the 2021 Annual Meeting. However, if any other business should properly be presented at the meeting, the proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons holding the proxies pursuant to Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act.
67
Table of Contents
Householding of Proxy Materials
The SEC permits companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single set of proxy materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially provides extra conveniences for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
Some brokers household our proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement or notice to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that it will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent.
If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate set of proxy materials, or if you are receiving multiple sets of proxy materials and wish to receive only one, please notify your broker. Stockholders who currently receive multiple sets of the proxy materials at their address and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact their broker.
Annual Report to Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K
Additional copies of our annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 and copies of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 as filed with the SEC (referred to in this Proxy Statement as the “2021 Annual Report”) are available to stockholders without charge upon written request addressed to: Investor Relations, ABIOMED, Inc., 22 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923.
Stockholder Proposals for 2022
Stockholders who wish to present a proposal for inclusion in our proxy materials for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders should follow the procedures prescribed in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. Those procedures require that we receive a stockholder proposal in writing no later than March 1, 2022 in order for such proposal to be included in our proxy materials. Written requests for inclusion should be addressed to: ABIOMED, Inc., 22 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, Attention: Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
Under our bylaws, stockholders who wish to nominate a director or include a proposal in our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (but do not wish to include such nomination or proposal in our proxy materials) must give us timely notice. To be timely, the notice must be received by us at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on the 90th day before the one-year anniversary of the 2021 Annual Meeting and no earlier than the close of business on 120th day before the one-year anniversary of the 2021 Annual Meeting. In the event the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is held more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the one-year anniversary of the 2021 Annual Meeting, the notice must be received by us at our principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day before the scheduled date of such annual meeting of stockholders or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.
The notice must contain specified information that is prescribed in our bylaws about you and the director nominee or the proposal, as applicable. Written requests should be addressed to: ABIOMED, Inc., 22 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, Attention: Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
68
Table of Contents
ABIOMED, INC. 22 CHERRY HILL DRIVE DANVERS, MA 01923 |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. VOTE BY INTERNET/TELEPHONE/MAIL 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Have your proxy card and Notice of Internet Availability (the “Notice”) in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. You will need the control number included on the Notice in order to vote by phone.
VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
If you are a shareholder of record or hold shares through a broker or bank, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on August 10, 2021. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
D55144-P58267-Z80312 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
ABIOMED, INC. | For All | Withhold All | For All Except | To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. | ||||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR ALL nominees in Proposal 1: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Election of Directors | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Nominees: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
01) Eric A. Rose | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
02) Jeannine M. Rivet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
03) Myron L. Rolle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 2: | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||||||||||
2. Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation of our named executive officers. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 3: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE: IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IF THIS PROXY IS SIGNED AND NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN WITH RESPECT TO A PROPOSAL, THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH NOMINEE LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | No | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
| Date
| Signature (Joint Owners)
| Date
|
Table of Contents
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at
www.proxyvote.com.
For directions to the Annual Meeting, please visit http://www.abiomed.com/proxy.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
D55145-P58267-Z80312
ABIOMED, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders August 11, 2021 8:00 A.M. Eastern Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors.
The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints Michael R. Minogue, Todd A. Trapp and Marc A. Began and each of them acting singly, as proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of capital of ABIOMED, Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ABIOMED, Inc. to be held at 8:00 A.M. Eastern Time on August 11, 2021 at the Beauport Hotel, 55 Commercial Street, Gloucester, Massachusetts 01930, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, upon the matters set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the related Proxy Statement, copies of which have been made available to the undersigned, and in their discretion upon any business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Attendance of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof will not be deemed to revoke this proxy unless the undersigned affirmatively indicates the undersigned’s intention to vote the shares represented hereby in person prior to the exercise of this proxy.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If this proxy is signed but no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.
Continued and to be signed on reverse side
|