Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 | ||
or | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number:33-29035
K&F Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 34-1614845 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
50 Main Street, White Plains, New York (Address of principal executive offices) | 10606 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(914) 448-2700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 10, 2006, there were 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding, par value $.01 per share. All of the common stock is held by K&F Intermediate Holdco, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of K&F Industries Holdings, Inc.
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
INDEX
* | Information for the December 31, 2005 balance sheet has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. | |||||||
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION |
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 16,518,000 | $ | 34,731,000 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 48,997,000 | 47,586,000 | ||||||
Inventory | 70,596,000 | 53,979,000 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other current assets | 22,812,000 | 21,112,000 | ||||||
Total current assets | 158,923,000 | 157,408,000 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 125,132,000 | 113,248,000 | ||||||
Less, accumulated depreciation and amortization | 17,239,000 | 11,363,000 | ||||||
107,893,000 | 101,885,000 | |||||||
Other long-term assets | 2,982,000 | 1,490,000 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization | 20,763,000 | 22,517,000 | ||||||
Program participation costs, net of accumulated amortization | 212,428,000 | 201,023,000 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization | 57,327,000 | 58,546,000 | ||||||
Goodwill | 852,770,000 | 841,049,000 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,413,086,000 | $ | 1,383,918,000 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY: | ||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 18,937,000 | $ | 18,223,000 | ||||
Current portion of long-term debt | — | 11,018,000 | ||||||
Interest payable | 6,793,000 | 5,171,000 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 9,117,000 | 7,230,000 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 50,217,000 | 49,141,000 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 85,064,000 | 90,783,000 | ||||||
Pension liabilities | 56,303,000 | 54,348,000 | ||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities | 52,892,000 | 43,234,000 | ||||||
Postretirement benefit obligations other than pensions | 93,813,000 | 92,625,000 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 9,860,000 | 5,491,000 | ||||||
Senior term loan | 436,000,000 | 439,982,000 | ||||||
73/4% senior subordinated notes due 2014 | 315,000,000 | 315,000,000 | ||||||
95/8% senior subordinated notes due 2010 | 577,000 | 577,000 | ||||||
Contingencies (Note 9) | ||||||||
Stockholder’s Equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value — authorized, 1,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 1,000 shares | — | — | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 309,810,000 | 309,810,000 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 55,604,000 | 34,001,000 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,837,000 | ) | (1,933,000 | ) | ||||
Total stockholder’s equity | 363,577,000 | 341,878,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity | $ | 1,413,086,000 | $ | 1,383,918,000 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Net sales | $ | 193,715,000 | $ | 178,992,000 | ||||
Cost of sales (includes inventory purchase accounting charges of $587,000 and $12,084,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively) | 106,680,000 | 108,665,000 | ||||||
Gross profit | 87,035,000 | 70,327,000 | ||||||
Independent research and development costs | 7,877,000 | 7,586,000 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 17,309,000 | 13,940,000 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2,715,000 | 6,028,000 | ||||||
Operating income | 59,134,000 | 42,773,000 | ||||||
Interest income | 1,709,000 | 151,000 | ||||||
Interest expense | (27,601,000 | ) | (29,641,000 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes | 33,242,000 | 13,283,000 | ||||||
Income tax provision | (11,639,000 | ) | (4,490,000 | ) | ||||
Net income | $ | 21,603,000 | $ | 8,793,000 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Net sales | $ | 102,653,000 | $ | 90,302,000 | ||||
Cost of sales (includes inventory purchase accounting charges of $587,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006) | 57,479,000 | 48,199,000 | ||||||
Gross profit | 45,174,000 | 42,103,000 | ||||||
Independent research and development costs | 3,838,000 | 3,753,000 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 10,167,000 | 6,661,000 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 1,005,000 | 3,014,000 | ||||||
Operating income | 30,164,000 | 28,675,000 | ||||||
Interest income | 1,388,000 | 88,000 | ||||||
Interest expense | (14,165,000 | ) | (14,840,000 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes | 17,387,000 | 13,923,000 | ||||||
Income tax provision | (6,085,000 | ) | (4,706,000 | ) | ||||
Net income | $ | 11,302,000 | $ | 9,217,000 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 21,603,000 | $ | 8,793,000 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 5,924,000 | 5,151,000 | ||||||
Amortization of program participation costs | 4,362,000 | 1,190,000 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 3,603,000 | 6,028,000 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 575,000 | 65,000 | ||||||
Non-cash interest expense — amortization/write-off of debt issuance costs | 1,754,000 | 4,743,000 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on change in fair market value of interest rate swaps and caps | (1,492,000 | ) | 264,000 | |||||
Inventory purchase accounting charges | 587,000 | 12,084,000 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 5,387,000 | 4,813,000 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effect of an acquisition: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (368,000 | ) | (500,000 | ) | ||||
Inventory | (13,341,000 | ) | (9,267,000 | ) | ||||
Other current assets | 1,119,000 | (678,000 | ) | |||||
Program participation costs — equipment | (14,267,000 | ) | (12,562,000 | ) | ||||
Program participation costs — cash | (1,500,000 | ) | (1,000,000 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable, interest payable and other current liabilities | 7,149,000 | 14,067,000 | ||||||
Pension liabilities | 1,955,000 | 2,000,000 | ||||||
Postretirement benefit obligations other than pensions | 1,188,000 | 1,344,000 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 869,000 | (52,000 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 25,107,000 | 36,483,000 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Payment for acquisition, net of cash acquired | (16,016,000 | ) | — | |||||
Capital expenditures | (12,304,000 | ) | (3,129,000 | ) | ||||
Payment of deferred purchase price | — | (14,682,000 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (28,320,000 | ) | (17,811,000 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Equity contributions | — | 20,000 | ||||||
Payments of long-term debt | (15,000,000 | ) | (19,000,000 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (15,000,000 | ) | (18,980,000 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (18,213,000 | ) | (308,000 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 34,731,000 | 9,636,000 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 16,518,000 | $ | 9,328,000 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||
Interest paid during period | $ | 26,171,000 | $ | 23,237,000 | ||||
Income taxes paid during the period | $ | 4,136,000 | $ | 767,000 | ||||
Income tax refund received during the period | $ | — | $ | 15,425,000 | ||||
Business acquisition: | ||||||||
Fair value of assets acquired, including goodwill | $ | 21,618,000 | ||||||
Cash paid, net of cash acquired | (16,016,000 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of note payable | (3,000,000 | ) | ||||||
Liabilities assumed | $ | 2,602,000 | ||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
1. | Description of the Business, Acquisitions and Other Developments |
Description of Business
K&F Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (“K&F Industries,” “K&F” or the “Company”), is primarily engaged in the design, development, manufacture and distribution of wheels, brakes and brake control systems for commercial, military and general aviation aircraft, and the manufacture of materials for fuel tanks, iceguards, inflatable oil booms and various other products made from coated fabrics for military and commercial uses. The Company serves the aerospace industry and sells its products to airframe manufacturers, commercial airlines and distributors throughout the world and to the United States government and certain foreign governments. The Company’s activities are conducted through its two wholly owned subsidiaries, Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation (“Aircraft Braking Systems”) and Engineered Fabrics Corporation (“Engineered Fabrics”).
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of K&F and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between these entities have been eliminated.
Acquisition of K&F Industries
On November 18, 2004, K&F Industries Holdings, Inc. (“K&F Holdings”), an affiliate of Aurora Capital Group, acquired K&F Industries in exchange for cash consideration of approximately $1.06 billion (excluding capitalized transaction costs of $40.4 million) (the “Acquisition”). In addition, the former K&F Industries’ equityholders retained $77.2 million of cash on hand at the Acquisition date. The cash consideration was used to repay substantially all of K&F Industries’ then existing indebtedness and the related fees and expenses of K&F Industries and certain of its stockholders, with the balance paid to former equityholders of K&F Industries. In addition, K&F Holdings issued a note, in the amount of $14.7 million, payable for the benefit of the prior K&F Industries’ equityholders, for the estimated tax benefits to be received by K&F Industries due to the payments of fees and premiums in connection with the tender offers for K&F Industries’ prior senior subordinated notes. The note matured and was paid on May 18, 2005 and K&F Industries received the proceeds of the tax refund in the approximate amount of the note prior to such time.
The Acquisition was financed with an offering by K&F Industries of $315.0 million of 73/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014, the borrowing by K&F Industries of $480.0 million under a $530 million senior secured credit facility and $309.8 million in equity investments from K&F Holdings. K&F Holdings contributed $309.8 million of equity to its wholly-owned subsidiary, K&F Intermediate Holdco, Inc., which then contributed such proceeds as equity to its wholly-owned subsidiary, K&F Acquisition, Inc., prior to the merger of K&F Acquisition, Inc. with and into K&F Industries.
Acquisition of Nasco Aircraft Brake, Inc.
On April 1, 2006, K&F acquired the common stock of Nasco Aircraft Brake, Inc. (“NASCO”) for approximately $19.0 million, including capitalized transaction costs. The acquisition was made using cash on hand and the issuance of a $3.0 million note. The acquisition further diversifies the portfolio of aircraft that K&F services, and provides the Company with access to proprietary technology and products that will enhance its overall product offerings. The results of operations of NASCO have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the date of acquisition. Pro forma information has not been included as the results of NASCO are not material to the Company.
Other Developments
In August 2005, K&F amended its management services agreement with Aurora Management Partners LLC. The amendment eliminated the $1.0 million annual fee payable over the 10 year term of the management services agreement in exchange for a $5.0 million fee that was expensed in the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
5
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
2. | Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, in the opinion of the Company, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules. The management of the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and notes thereto included in K&F’s December 31, 2005 Annual Report onForm 10-K.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.
3. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes |
Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize in its financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not to be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for the Company at the beginning of 2007, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — An Amendment of SFAS Nos. 133 and 140.” SFAS No. 155 simplifies the accounting for certain hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would have required bifurcation. SFAS No. 155 also eliminates the interim guidance in SFAS No. 133, which provides that beneficial interest in securitized financial assets are not subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, which for the Company will be as of the beginning of 2007. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a significant effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Changes
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of, and accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with, SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” which replaced SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. The Company elected the modified-prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. The valuation provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) apply to new grants and to grants that were outstanding as of the effective date and are subsequently modified. Compensation expense for unvested grants that were outstanding as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost estimated for the SFAS No. 123 pro forma disclosures.
6
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company recorded $241,000 and $400,000 of stock-based compensation expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. See Note 7 for further information regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation assumptions and expenses, including pro forma disclosures for prior periods as if the Company had recorded stock-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R).
4. | Accounts Receivable consists of the follows: |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, principally from commercial and general aviation customers | $ | 45,355,000 | $ | 43,626,000 | ||||
Accounts receivable on U.S. Government and other long-term contracts | 5,284,000 | 5,587,000 | ||||||
Allowances | (1,642,000 | ) | (1,627,000 | ) | ||||
$ | 48,997,000 | $ | 47,586,000 | |||||
5. | Inventory consists of the following: |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Raw materials andwork-in-process | $ | 38,573,000 | $ | 29,689,000 | ||||
Finished goods | 14,505,000 | 11,920,000 | ||||||
Inventoried costs related to U.S. Government and other long-term contracts | 17,518,000 | 12,370,000 | ||||||
$ | 70,596,000 | $ | 53,979,000 | |||||
6. | Other current liabilities consist of the following: |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Accrued payroll and payroll related costs | $ | 12,077,000 | $ | 14,128,000 | ||||
Accrued property and other taxes | 3,121,000 | 2,507,000 | ||||||
Accrued costs on long-term contracts | 2,961,000 | 3,963,000 | ||||||
Accrued warranty costs | 13,083,000 | 12,327,000 | ||||||
Customer credits | 6,855,000 | 7,264,000 | ||||||
Postretirement benefit obligations other than pensions | 6,000,000 | 6,000,000 | ||||||
Other | 6,120,000 | 2,952,000 | ||||||
$ | 50,217,000 | $ | 49,141,000 | |||||
7. | Stock Options |
K&F Holdings has a stock option plan covering an aggregate of 2,500,000 authorized shares of common stock, for the benefit of, and to provide incentives to officers, directors, employees and advisors of K&F and its subsidiaries. The exercise prices of all stock options issued were equal to the market value of K&F Holdings common shares at the date of grant. Options issued to advisors vest immediately and options issued to officers, directors and employees vest at the rate of 20% per year. The options have a contractual life of 10 years.
7
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006. See Note 3 for a further discussion of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The Company uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. The principal assumptions utilized in valuing options and the Company’s methodology for estimating such model inputs include: (i) expected volatility — estimate is based on the three-year trailing volatility of publicly traded companies in the Company’s peer group. This was used because the K&F Holdings’ common stock has only been publicly traded since August 2005; (ii) risk free interest rate — represents the rate available on U.S. government bonds at the date of grant with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option; (iii) expected option life — estimate is determined by taking the average of the vesting term and the contractual term of the option; and (iv) dividend yield — K&F Holdings does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
There were 235,250 stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. Total stock-based compensation (included in selling, general and administrative expenses) recognized on the consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized is $3.8 million at June 30, 2006, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.1 years.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123 requires the disclosure of pro forma net income (loss) had the Company adopted the fair value method. The following tables detail the effect on net income (loss) had compensation expense for the stock option plan awards been recorded based on the fair value method under SFAS No. 123:
Three Months Ended | ||||
June 30, 2005 | ||||
Reported net income | $ | 9,217,000 | ||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee and director compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects | (128,000 | ) | ||
Pro forma net income | $ | 9,089,000 | ||
Six Months Ended | ||||
June 30, 2005 | ||||
Reported net income | $ | 8,793,000 | ||
Add: Stock-based compensation included in net income, net of related tax effects | 40,000 | |||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee and director compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects | (296,000 | ) | ||
Pro forma net income | $ | 8,537,000 | ||
The assumptions used to value option grants for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 are as follows:
Volatility | 32.88% | |||
Risk free interest rate | 3.97% | |||
Dividend yield | 0.0% | |||
Expected life | 7.0 years |
8
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
The assumptions used to value option grants for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 are as follows:
Volatility | 23.86% | |||
Risk free interest rate | 5.03% | |||
Dividend yield | 0.0% | |||
Expected life | 7.0 years |
Stock option activity is as follows:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Number of Options | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 | 1,404,821 | $ | 5.50 | |||||
Granted | 235,250 | 17.80 | ||||||
Exercised | (53,565 | ) | 5.22 | |||||
Forfeited or expired | — | — | ||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 | 1,586,506 | 7.33 | ||||||
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value of K&F’s common stock and the exercise price of the shares. The weighted average grant date fair value for options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $6.94 per share. The weighted average grant date fair value for options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $2.25 per share. Cash received by K&F Holdings from the exercise of stock options during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.3 million and $0.0 million, respectively. There were no exercises in 2005.
The following summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2006:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Weighted Average | Weighted Average | Number | Weighted Average | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Price | Outstanding | Life (Years) | Exercise Price | Exercisable | Life (Years) | Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||||||
$ 5.22 | 1,317,175 | 8.5 | $ | 5.22 | 243,570 | 8.5 | $ | 5.22 | ||||||||||||||||
15.16 | 5,000 | 9.3 | 15.16 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
17.00 | 29,081 | 9.4 | 17.00 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
17.80 | 235,250 | 9.8 | 17.80 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
1,586,506 | 8.7 | 7.33 | 243,570 | 8.5 | 5.22 | |||||||||||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable as of June 30, 2006 was $16.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.6 million and was $0.1 million, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.
At June 30, 2006, there were 859,929 shares available for future grants under the terms of the K&F Holdings’ stock option plan. K&F Holdings is authorized to issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options awarded under the plan.
8. | Income Taxes |
The Company determines an estimated annual effective income tax rate and this rate is updated at the end of each interim period. This rate is used to provide income taxes on ordinary income on a current year to date basis. The tax effect on certain significant, unusual or extraordinary items is not taken into account in calculating the estimated annual effective rate but is taken into account entirely in the interim period when such item occurs.
The Company’s effective tax rate of 35.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 equals the statutory rate of 35.0% as a result of state and local income taxes, offset by tax benefits derived from export sales and domestic
9
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
production activities. The Company’s effective tax rate of 33.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 differs from the statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to tax benefits derived from export sales, partially offset by state, local and foreign taxes and an increase in tax reserves.
The Company’s effective tax rate of 35.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 equals the statutory rate of 35.0% as a result of state and local income taxes, offset by tax benefits derived from export sales and domestic production activities. The Company’s effective tax rate of 33.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 differs from the statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to tax benefits derived from export sales, partially offset by state, local and foreign taxes and an increase in tax reserves.
9. | Contingencies |
There are various lawsuits and claims pending against the Company which are incidental to its business. Although the ultimate resolution of such suits and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of the Company’s management, the ultimate outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
10. | Comprehensive Income |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 11,302,000 | $ | 9,217,000 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments | 89,000 | (118,000 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 11,391,000 | $ | 9,099,000 | ||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 21,603,000 | $ | 8,793,000 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments | 96,000 | (150,000 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 21,699,000 | $ | 8,643,000 | ||||
11. | Goodwill, Intangible Assets, Debt Issuance Costs and Program Participation Costs |
Goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization consist of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Goodwill | $ | 852,770,000 | $ | 841,049,000 | ||||
Trademarks | 6,205,000 | 5,588,000 | ||||||
Total unamortizable intangible assets | $ | 858,975,000 | $ | 846,637,000 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Goodwill allocated to business segments at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is as follows:
Aircraft Braking | ||||||||||||
Systems | Engineered Fabrics | Total | ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | 765,380,000 | $ | 75,669,000 | $ | 841,049,000 | ||||||
Increase | 11,721,000 | — | 11,721,000 | |||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2006 | $ | 777,101,000 | $ | 75,669,000 | $ | 852,770,000 | ||||||
The increase in the carrying amount of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2006 represents the preliminary goodwill acquired in connection with the acquisition of NASCO on April 1, 2006. The Company is in the process of finalizing third party valuations of certain intangible assets, thus the allocation of the purchase price relating to the acquisition of NASCO is subject to refinement. The Company performs an annual impairment test of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year, or anytime there is an indication of potential impairment.
Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following:
Estimated | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Average | ||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Net | Useful Life | |||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs | $ | 26,599,000 | $ | (5,836,000 | ) | $ | 20,763,000 | 9 years | ||||||||
Program participation costs | $ | 220,992,000 | $ | (8,564,000 | ) | $ | 212,428,000 | 25 years | ||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 13,857,000 | $ | (5,228,000 | ) | $ | 8,629,000 | 22 years | ||||||||
Engineering drawings | 20,881,000 | (1,878,000 | ) | 19,003,000 | 18 years | |||||||||||
Contract backlog | 12,401,000 | (6,163,000 | ) | 6,238,000 | 3 years | |||||||||||
In-house libraries | 8,297,000 | (746,000 | ) | 7,551,000 | 18 years | |||||||||||
Technology licenses | 7,464,000 | (1,158,000 | ) | 6,306,000 | 10 years | |||||||||||
Patents | 4,017,000 | (622,000 | ) | 3,395,000 | 11 years | |||||||||||
Total amortizable intangible assets | $ | 66,917,000 | $ | (15,795,000 | ) | $ | 51,122,000 | |||||||||
.
Estimated | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2005 | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Average | ||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Net | Useful Life | |||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs | $ | 26,599,000 | $ | (4,082,000 | ) | $ | 22,517,000 | 9 years | ||||||||
Program participation costs | $ | 205,225,000 | $ | (4,202,000 | ) | $ | 201,023,000 | 25 years | ||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 12,749,000 | $ | (4,938,000 | ) | $ | 7,811,000 | 24 years | ||||||||
Engineering drawings | 20,881,000 | (1,299,000 | ) | 19,582,000 | 18 years | |||||||||||
Contract backlog | 12,203,000 | (4,225,000 | ) | 7,978,000 | 3 years | |||||||||||
In-house libraries | 8,297,000 | (516,000 | ) | 7,781,000 | 18 years | |||||||||||
Technology licenses | 7,003,000 | (784,000 | ) | 6,219,000 | 10 years | |||||||||||
Patents | 4,017,000 | (430,000 | ) | 3,587,000 | 11 years | |||||||||||
Total amortizable intangible assets | $ | 65,150,000 | $ | (12,192,000 | ) | $ | 52,958,000 | |||||||||
11
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company finalized the allocation of purchase price relating to the Acquisition. This resulted in the reallocation of approximately $126.0 million from customer relationships to program participation costs. The estimated weighted average useful life is 25 years for both of these intangible assets at Aircraft Braking Systems. Amortization of program participation costs is recorded as a charge to cost of sales while amortization of customer relationships is charged to amortization of intangible assets. This reallocation will have no effect on net income, but gross profit will be reduced by approximately $5.0 million per year, for the life of this asset, and amortization of intangible assets will be reduced by the same amount. This change was made prospectively and, therefore, prior periods will not be revised for comparative purposes.
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company re-evaluated the classification of the amortization of its intangible assets and concluded that certain of this amortization should have been in cost of sales instead of operating expense. This revision will have no effect on net income, but gross profit will be reduced by approximately $1.8 million per year over the 18 year life of the assets, and amortization of intangible assets will be reduced by the same amount. This change was made prospectively and, therefore, prior periods will not be revised for comparative purposes as the effect of the revision does not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The aggregate amortization expense during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $4.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, and $8.0 million and $7.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense for intangible assets, program participation costs and debt issuance costs (non-cash interest), assuming no increases or decreases in the gross carrying amounts, for the balance of the year and in each of the five succeeding years, is as follows:
Program | Debt | |||||||||||
Intangible | Participation | Issuance | ||||||||||
Asset - | Costs - | Costs - | ||||||||||
Year Ending December 31, | Amortization | Amortization | Amortization | |||||||||
Remainder of 2006 | $ | 3,800,000 | $ | 4,400,000 | $ | 1,700,000 | ||||||
2007 | 7,000,000 | 8,800,000 | 3,400,000 | |||||||||
2008 | 4,100,000 | 8,800,000 | 3,200,000 | |||||||||
2009 | 3,300,000 | 8,800,000 | 3,100,000 | |||||||||
2010 | 3,300,000 | 8,800,000 | 3,000,000 | |||||||||
2011 | 3,100,000 | 8,800,000 | 2,700,000 |
12
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
12. | Segments |
The following tables represent financial information about the Company’s segments:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Net Sales: | ||||||||
Aircraft Braking Systems | $ | 84,234,000 | (a) | $ | 73,737,000 | |||
Engineered Fabrics | 18,419,000 | 16,565,000 | ||||||
$ | 102,653,000 | $ | 90,302,000 | |||||
Operating Profit: | ||||||||
Aircraft Braking Systems | $ | 27,706,000 | (b) | $ | 27,035,000 | |||
Engineered Fabrics | 2,458,000 | 1,640,000 | ||||||
Operating income | 30,164,000 | 28,675,000 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income | (12,777,000 | ) | (14,752,000 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 17,387,000 | $ | 13,923,000 | ||||
(a) | Includes $2.4 million of sales relating to past due amounts owed under a licensing agreement. | |
(b) | Includes a $2.2 million charge related to a retroactive price increase for certain materials purchased over the 12 months ended June 30, 2006. |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Net Sales: | ||||||||
Aircraft Braking Systems | $ | 160,176,000 | (a) | $ | 147,661,000 | |||
Engineered Fabrics | 33,539,000 | 31,331,000 | ||||||
$ | 193,715,000 | $ | 178,992,000 | |||||
Operating Profit: | ||||||||
Aircraft Braking Systems | $ | 55,120,000 | (b) | $ | 40,730,000 | |||
Engineered Fabrics | 4,014,000 | 2,043,000 | ||||||
Operating income | 59,134,000 | 42,773,000 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income | (25,892,000 | ) | (29,490,000 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 33,242,000 | $ | 13,283,000 | ||||
(a) | Includes $2.4 million of sales relating to past due amounts owed under a licensing agreement. | |
(b) | Includes a $2.2 million charge related to a retroactive price increase for certain materials purchased over the 12 months ended June 30, 2006. |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Total Assets: | ||||||||
Aircraft Braking Systems | $ | 1,250,411,000 | $ | 1,221,962,000 | ||||
Engineered Fabrics | 138,030,000 | 133,731,000 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs, net, not allocated to segments | 20,763,000 | 22,517,000 | ||||||
Corporate assets | 3,882,000 | 5,708,000 | ||||||
$ | 1,413,086,000 | $ | 1,383,918,000 | |||||
13
Table of Contents
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
The results from April 1, 2006 for NASCO are included within the results for Aircraft Braking Systems.
13. | Product Warranty |
Estimated costs of warranty are accrued when individual claims arise with respect to a product or performance. When the Company becomes aware of a defect in a particular product, the estimated costs of all potential warranty claims arising from similar defects of all similar products are fully accrued. An analysis of changes in the liability for product warranty for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | 12,674,000 | ||
Current provisions | 3,595,000 | |||
Expenditures | (2,085,000 | ) | ||
Balance at June 30, 2006 | $ | 14,184,000 | ||
The current and long-term portions of product warranties are as follows:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Current liabilities | $ | 13,083,000 | $ | 12,327,000 | ||||
Long-term liabilities | 1,101,000 | 347,000 | ||||||
Total | $ | 14,184,000 | $ | 12,674,000 | ||||
14. | Employee Benefit Plans |
The following represents the net periodic benefit cost for the defined benefit and postretirement benefit plans:
Pension Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1,083,000 | $ | 836,000 | $ | 2,166,000 | $ | 2,061,000 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 2,285,000 | 2,192,000 | 4,570,000 | 4,385,000 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (2,280,000 | ) | (2,228,000 | ) | (4,560,000 | ) | (4,446,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 1,088,000 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 2,176,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | ||||||||
Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 448,000 | $ | 478,000 | $ | 896,000 | $ | 956,000 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 1,400,000 | 1,396,000 | 2,800,000 | 2,792,000 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 1,848,000 | $ | 1,874,000 | $ | 3,696,000 | $ | 3,748,000 | ||||||||
The Company did not make any contributions to its qualified defined benefit pension plans during the first six months of 2006 and does not plan to make any during the remainder of 2006. The Company made $0.2 million of contributions related to its supplemental executive retirement plan during the first six months of 2006 and expects to contribute an additional $0.3 million during the remainder of 2006.
14
Table of Contents
15. | Financial Instruments |
The carrying amounts of all financial instruments reported on the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 approximate their fair value, except as discussed below.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s 73/4% Notes, based on quoted market prices or on current rates for similar debt with the same maturities was approximately $310.0 million and $317.0 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The estimated fair value of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness on the credit facility approximates its fair value because the interest rates on the debt are reset on a frequent basis to reflect current market rates.
As a requirement of the credit facility, K&F Industries entered into the following interest rate contracts:
• | a 3 month LIBOR interest rate cap at 6% from December 2005 to December 2007 for an increasing notional amount starting at $144.6 million, increasing to $161.2 million; | |
• | a swap arrangement for a portion of our term loans from a variable 3 month LIBOR interest rate to a fixed rate of 4.0375%, beginning January 24, 2006. The notional amount of the swap is initially $95.4 million and declines to $78.8 million on January 24, 2008 at the termination of the swap agreement; and | |
• | a swap arrangement for a portion of our term loans from a variable 3 month LIBOR interest rate to a fixed rate of 4.506%, beginning January 24, 2006. The notional amount of the swap is initially $47.7 million and declines to $39.4 million on January 24, 2008 at the termination of the swap agreement. |
The three month LIBOR interest rate at June 30, 2006 was 5.48%.
None of these derivatives were designated as hedges; accordingly, all changes in their fair value were recognized in earnings.
The carrying amount of the interest rate cap was recorded as a long-term asset of $161,000 and $87,000 on the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The change in its fair value of $40,000 and ($235,000) was recorded in the consolidated statements of income as a reduction to interest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and as an increase during the three months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The change in its fair value of $74,000 and ($264,000) was recorded in the consolidated statements of income as a reduction to interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and as an increase during the six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
The fair values of the interest rate swaps at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $2.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively, which were recorded as long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps was recorded as a reduction to interest expense in the consolidated statements of income of $512,000 and $0.0 during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $1.4 million and $0.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company received payment of $153,000 from the counterparties to the interest rate swaps during the three months ended June 30, 2006, which was recorded as interest income in the consolidated statements of income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. No payments have been received prior to this.
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limitation, the statements under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. They include statements relating to future revenues and expenses, the expected growth of our business, spending by the United States government on defense, future levels of business in the commercial and general aviation industries, competition from other suppliers and the effect of environmental or similar laws and determinations in lawsuits. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors including, but not limited to, those described in “Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors”
15
Table of Contents
included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors may cause our actual results, performance and achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report are based on information available to us on the date of this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this Quarterly Report.
General
K&F Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries, or “K&F Industries,” “K&F,” “we,” “our” or the “Company” is primarily engaged in the design, development, manufacture and distribution of wheels, brakes and brake control systems for commercial, military and general aviation aircraft, and the manufacture of materials for fuel tanks, iceguards, inflatable oil booms and various other products made from coated fabrics for military and commercial uses. We serve the aerospace industry and sell our products to airframe manufacturers, commercial airlines and distributors throughout the world and to the United States government and certain foreign governments. Our activities are conducted through our two wholly owned subsidiaries, Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation, or “Aircraft Braking Systems” and Engineered Fabrics Corporation, or “Engineered Fabrics”.
Performance Evaluation
We evaluate the operations of Aircraft Braking Systems and Engineered Fabrics separately because these two subsidiaries have different products, technologies and operating strategies. Management primarily evaluates the performance of each of these subsidiaries based on profits from operations before interest and income taxes, or “operating profit.” We review these subsidiaries’ sales, bookings and operating profit monthly.
In evaluating Aircraft Braking Systems, management also analyzes both reported Available Seat Miles, or “ASMs,” computed by measuring for each flight total seat capacity multiplied by the number of miles flown and reported Revenue Passenger Miles, or “RPMs,” which are defined as the number of passengers multiplied by the miles flown, to asses the overall state of the commercial aerospace industry. Management also reviews both historical and projected ASM and RPM statistics to evaluate Aircraft Braking System’s past performance and to assist in predicting future expenditures and operating performance.
Certain Market Trends, Challenges and Opportunities
In general, the commercial aerospace industry, which suffered after the events of September 11, 2001 and the subsequent downturn in the global economy, the SARS epidemic, rising fuel prices and the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, has rebounded. We have seen relatively consistent increases in ASMs and RPMs to pre-September 11, 2001 levels, although the industry challenges, such as major airline financial distress and the risk of additional terrorist activity, remain.
We believe our position in the aerospace industry is balanced and thus may mitigate general industry risks. We service a diversified portfolio of customers across the commercial transport, general aviation and military sectors. Historically, declines in any one sector have often been offset by increased revenues in another. For example, the commercial transport and general aviation sectors that we serve were adversely affected by September 11, 2001, but the downturn in those markets was partially offset by an increase in military aircraft spending. Our sales in both the commercial transport and the general aviation sectors have shown recovery from the downturn. In addition, we have not suffered any significant losses due to the bankruptcies of some airline operators.
We believe that conditions in the commercial transport and general aviation market sectors continue to improve. We expect to see growth in the high-cycle regional jet market as airlines continue to increase their use of regional jets to addpoint-to-point service, as well as to drive feeder traffic to their hubs. We believe that this growth will be driven by the 70-90 passenger regional jets (Embraer ERJ-170/190 and Bombardier CRJ-700/900) as opposed to the more mature 30-50 passenger regional jets. We also expect growth in the high-end business jet market due to the perception that they provide greater productivity, comfort, convenience and security, as well as the continued popularity of fractional ownership. We believe we are well-positioned to win new opportunities for
16
Table of Contents
original equipment and replacement part sales in these sectors, but if these sectors do not grow as we expect, such opportunities may not arise. We saw strength in sales in the military and general aviation sectors during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, while commercial transport sales were up slightly for the three and six month periods when compared with the prior year.
Our military business has been and remains variable year to year, and is dependent, to a degree, on government budget constraints, the timing of orders and the extent of global conflicts. However, we expect new military opportunities to arise, as we are the largest supplier of wheels, brakes and flexible bladder fuel tanks for U.S. military aircraft and we anticipate that this equipment will be maintained, replaced and modernized as the active fleet of military aircraft experiences longer service periods.
At Engineered Fabrics, we have seen a trend where original equipment manufacturers outsource portions of their manufacturing process. We intend to capitalize on this trend to add additional products to aircraft on which we already supply existing products.
Our business would be adversely affected by significant changes in the U.S. or global economy. Historically, aircraft travel, as measured by ASMs or RPMs, generally correlates to economic conditions, and a reduction in aircraft travel would result in less frequent replacement of wheels and brakes.
Acquisition of K&F Industries
On November 18, 2004, K&F Industries Holdings, Inc., or “K&F Holdings,” an affiliate of Aurora Capital Group, acquired K&F Industries in exchange for cash consideration of approximately $1.06 billion (excluding capitalized transaction costs of $40.4 million). In addition, the former K&F Industries’ equityholders retained $77.2 million of cash on hand at the acquisition date. The cash consideration was used to repay substantially all of K&F Industries’ then existing indebtedness and the related fees and expenses of K&F Industries and certain of its stockholders, with the balance paid to the former equityholders of K&F Industries. In addition, K&F Holdings issued a note in the amount of $14.7 million, payable for the benefit of the prior K&F Industries’ equityholders, for the estimated tax benefits to be received by K&F Industries due to the payments of fees and premiums in connection with the tender offers for K&F Industries’ prior senior subordinated notes. The note matured and was paid on May 18, 2005 and K&F Industries received the proceeds of the tax refund in the approximate amount of the note. We refer to this as the “Acquisition”.
The Acquisition was financed with an offering by K&F Industries of $315.0 million of 73/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014, the borrowing by K&F Industries of $480.0 million under a $530 million senior secured credit facility and $309.8 million in equity investments from K&F Holdings. K&F Holdings contributed the $309.8 million of equity to its wholly-owned subsidiary, K&F Intermediate Holdco, Inc., which then contributed such proceeds as equity to its wholly-owned subsidiary, K&F Acquisition, Inc., prior to the merger of K&F Acquisition, Inc. with and into K&F Industries.
Acquisition of Nasco Aircraft Brake, Inc.
On April 1, 2006, we acquired the common stock of Nasco Aircraft Brake, Inc., or “NASCO” for approximately $19.0 million, including capitalized transaction costs. The acquisition was made using cash on hand and the issuance of a $3.0 million note. The acquisition further diversifies the portfolio of aircraft that K&F services, and will provides us with access to proprietary technology and products that enhance our overall product offerings. The results of operations of NASCO have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the date of acquisition.
Non-GAAP Financial Information
“EBITDA” represents net income before interest expense, income taxes and depreciation and amortization. We present EBITDA because we believe it is a useful indicator of our operating performance. Our management uses EBITDA principally as a measure of our operating performance and believes that EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in their evaluation of companies in industries similar to ours. We also believe EBITDA is useful to our management and investors as a measure of comparative operating performance between time periods and among companies as it is reflective of changes in pricing decisions, cost controls and other factors that affect operating performance. Our management
17
Table of Contents
also uses EBITDA for planning purposes, including the preparation of our annual operating budget and financial projections and as a metric to determine our ability to service our debt. EBITDA does not represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations, as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, our calculations of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies.
The following tables represent a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA, for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 31, 2006 | June 31, 2005 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 11,302,000 | $ | 9,217,000 | ||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 7,135,000 | 6,236,000 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income | 12,777,000 | 14,752,000 | ||||||
Income tax provision | 6,085,000 | 4,706,000 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 37,299,000 | (a)(b) | $ | 34,911,000 | (a) | ||
(a) | Includes pre-tax non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. | |
(b) | Includes pre-tax inventory purchase accounting charges of $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2006. |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 21,603,000 | $ | 8,793,000 | ||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 13,889,000 | 12,369,000 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income | 25,892,000 | 29,490,000 | ||||||
Income tax provision | 11,639,000 | 4,490,000 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 73,023,000 | (a)(b) | $ | 55,142,000 | (a)(b) | ||
(a) | Includes pre-tax non-cash stock-based compensation of $0.6 million and $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. | |
(b) | Includes pre-tax inventory purchase accounting charges of $0.6 million and $12.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
18
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
This section is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, workers compensation liabilities, pension and other postretirement benefits, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue from the sale of products is generally recognized upon shipment to customers, provided that there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance, there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, the sales price is fixed and determinable and collection of the receivable is probable.
Inventory. Inventory is stated at average cost, not in excess of net realizable value. In accordance with industry practice, inventoried costs may contain amounts related to contracts with long production cycles, a portion of which will not be realized within one year. Write-downs for slow moving and obsolete inventories are provided based on current assessments about future product demand and production requirements for the next twelve months. These factors are impacted by market conditions, technology changes, and changes in strategic direction, and require estimates and management judgment that may include elements that are uncertain. We evaluate the adequacy of these write-downs quarterly.
Although we strive to achieve a balance between market demands and risk of inventory excess or obsolescence, it is possible that, should conditions change, additional write-downs may be needed. Any changes in reserves will impact operating income during a given period. This policy is consistently applied to each of our operating segments, and we do not anticipate any changes to our policy in the near term.
Evaluation of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets are assessed for recoverability on an ongoing basis in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or “SFAS” No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” In evaluating the value and future benefits of long-lived assets, their carrying value is compared to management’s estimate of the anticipated undiscounted future net cash flows of the related long-lived asset. Any necessary impairment charges would be recorded when we do not believe the carrying value of the long-lived asset will be recoverable.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” we do not amortize goodwill and other intangible assets that are deemed to have indefinite lives. We test these assets for impairment at least annually or more frequently if any event occurs or circumstances change that indicate possible impairment.
Goodwill represents the excess cost of the businesses acquired over the fair market value of the identifiable net assets.
Upon completion of the Acquisition, we determined that Aircraft Braking Systems and Engineered Fabrics qualified as reporting units because discrete financial information exists for each operation and the management of each operation directly reviewed the operation’s performance. In the future, if we determine that our current structure no longer meets the requirements of a reporting unit, we will reevaluate the reporting units with respect to the changes in our reporting structure.
The first step of the impairment test identifies potential impairments by comparing the estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis of each reporting unit with its corresponding net book value, including goodwill. Assumptions are made about interest rates in calculating the discounted cash flow analysis. If the net book value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test determines the potential impairment loss by applying the estimated fair value first to the tangible assets, then to the identifiable intangible
19
Table of Contents
assets. Any remaining value would then be applied to the goodwill. The excess carrying value of goodwill over the remaining fair value would indicate the amount of the impairment charge.
Program Participation Costs. “Program Participation Costs” consist of incentives given to Original Equipment Aircraft Manufacturers (“OEMs”) in connection with their sole source selection of our products for installation on aircraft. Prior to the completion of the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”)-certification process, these incentives consist of cash payments. After the completion of the FAA-certification process, these incentives consist of cash payments, products discounted below cost and free products. The costs associated with a discounted product or free product are equal to the amount by which the cost of production exceeds the sales price of such product. Any equipment that is shipped prior to the completion of the FAA-certification process is expensed. In most cases, we do not receive revenue from the OEM for wheel and brake parts, and do not generate profits until we sell replacement parts to the OEMs’ customers and end-user aircraft operators.
We (i) expense all three components of Program Participation Costs for non-sole source programs in cost of sales when the applicable original equipment is shipped or the cash payments component is paid and (ii) capitalize Program Participation Costs for sole source contracts. A “sole source contract” is a contractual commitment from the OEM pursuant to which the OEM (i) agrees to purchase parts for newly-produced aircraft exclusively from us and (ii) agrees not to support an attempt by a different supplier to be certified as a supplier of replacement parts for such aircraft platform. These sole source contracts require us to supply the OEM with all of the OEM’s parts requirements for as long as the applicable aircraft is produced and is in service. Accordingly, we amortize all capitalized Program Participation Costs as an expense in cost of sales on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated economic useful life of the aircraft or 25 years.
These types of costs vary from year to year and our levels of spending may increase or decrease as the business base dictates. Program Participation Costs assets are assessed for recoverability in accordance with SFAS No. 144.
Warranty. Estimated costs of warranty are accrued when individual claims arise with respect to a product or performance. When we become aware of those types of defects, the estimated costs of all potential warranty claims arising from similar defects of all similar products are fully accrued. Such costs are included in cost of sales. See Note 14 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits. We have significant pension and postretirement benefit costs and liabilities. The determination of our obligation and expense for pension and other postretirement benefits is dependent on our selection of certain assumptions used by actuaries in calculating those amounts. Assumptions are made about interest rates, expected investment return on plan assets, rate of increase in health care costs, total and involuntary turnover rates, and rates of future compensation increases. In addition, our actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal rates and mortality rates to develop our valuations. We generally review and update these assumptions at the beginning of each fiscal year. We are required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates, in making these assumptions. The actuarial assumptions that we may use may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact on the amount of pension and postretirement benefits expense we have recorded or may record.
We determine our discount rate by analyzing the changes in high-quality fixed income investments, such as Moody’s AA Corporate Bonds, in the past year.
In addition we produce a cash flow of annual accrued benefits as defined under the Projected Unit Cost Method as provided by SFAS No. 87. For active participants, service is projected to the end of the year and benefit earnings are projected to the date of termination. The projected plan cash flow is discounted to the measurement date using the yields from a selection of high quality corporate bonds. A single discount rate is then computed so that the present value of the benefit cash flow equals the present value computed using the selected investment grade bond rates. We used a 6.0% discount rate in 2005 and are using a 5.75% discount rate in 2006 determined on this basis.
In determining the expected long-term rate of return on assets, we evaluated input from our investment consultants, actuaries and investment management firm, including their review of asset class return expectations, as well as long-term historical asset class returns. Projected returns by such consultants and economists are based on broad equity and bond indices. Additionally, we considered our most recent four year compounded returns, which
20
Table of Contents
have been in excess of our forward-looking return expectations. Our current asset manager has invested our pension assets over the last four years.
The expected long-term rate of return determined on this basis was 9.0% in both 2005 and 2006. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets has been based on an asset allocation assumption of 60% in equity, with an expected long-term rate of return on assets of 10% and 40% in fixed income, with an expected long-term rate of return on assets of 7%.
The annual postretirement expense was calculated using a number of actuarial assumptions, including a health care cost trend rate and a discount rate. Our discount rate assumption for postretirement benefits is consistent with that used in the calculation of pension benefits. The healthcare cost trend rate being used to calculate the 2006 postretirement expense is 9.5% in 2006 trending down to 5.0% for 2012.
Business Segment Financial Information
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Sales: | ||||||||||||||||
Aircraft Braking Systems | $ | 84,234,000 | $ | 73,737,000 | $ | 160,176,000 | $ | 147,661,000 | ||||||||
Engineered Fabrics | 18,419,000 | 16,565,000 | 33,539,000 | 31,331,000 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 102,653,000 | $ | 90,302,000 | $ | 193,715,000 | $ | 178,992,000 | ||||||||
Gross Profit: | ||||||||||||||||
Aircraft Braking Systems | $ | 41,417,000 | $ | 38,441,000 | $ | 80,392,000 | $ | 64,695,000 | ||||||||
Engineered Fabrics | 3,757,000 | 3,662,000 | 6,643,000 | 5,632,000 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 45,174,000 | $ | 42,103,000 | $ | 87,035,000 | $ | 70,327,000 | ||||||||
Gross Profit Margin: | ||||||||||||||||
Aircraft Braking Systems | 49.2% | 52.1% | 50.2% | 43.8% | ||||||||||||
Engineered Fabrics | 20.4% | 22.1% | 19.8% | 18.0% | ||||||||||||
Consolidated | 44.0% | 46.6% | 44.9% | 39.3% |
Consolidated Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005
Our net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $193,715,000, reflecting an increase of $14,723,000, compared with $178,992,000 for the same period in the prior year. This increase was due to higher sales at Aircraft Braking Systems of $12,515,000 and at Engineered Fabrics of $2,208,000.
Military sales at Aircraft Braking Systems increased $8,024,000, primarily due to higher sales of wheels and brakes on the Boeing B-1B and the Lockheed Martin C-130 programs and due to the settlement with a customer for approximately $2.4 million relating to past due amounts owed to us by them under a licensing agreement. General aviation sales at Aircraft Braking Systems increased $4,256,000, primarily due to higher sales of wheels and brakes on Raytheon, Lear and Dassault aircraft. Commercial transport sales at Aircraft Braking Systems increased $235,000, primarily due to higher sales of wheels and brakes on the EmbraerERJ-170 and ERJ-190 and the BoeingMD-90 programs and higher sales of brake control systems on theBoeing MD-11 program, partially offset by lower sales of wheels and brakes on the Boeing DC-9 and DC-10 and the Bombardier CRJ-100/200 and CRJ-700 programs. Sales at Engineered Fabrics increased $2,208,000 primarily due to higher military sales of fuel tanks for the BoeingAH-64, CH-47 and KC-135, the Lockheed Martin C-130 and various other fuel tank programs, partially offset by lower sales on the Northrop Grumman T-38 and Sikorky SH-60 Seahawk programs.
Our gross profit increased by $16,708,000 to $87,035,000, or 44.9% of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $70,327,000, or 39.3% of sales for the same period in the prior year. The increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to $12,084,000 of inventory purchase accounting charges recorded in 2005 related to the Acquisition, higher sales volume and results of our productivity initiatives. Partially offsetting this increase was a $2,170,000 charge recorded in 2006 related to a retroactive price increase for certain materials purchased over
21
Table of Contents
the 12 months ended June 30, 2006, higher amortization of Program Participation Costs (see table below) and intangible assets and inventory purchase accounting charges of $0.6 million related to the NASCO acquisition.
The following table provides additional information detailing Program Participation Costs:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Gross Program Participation Costs | $ | 20,877,000 | $ | 19,931,000 | ||||
Amount capitalized during period | (15,767,000 | ) | (13,562,000 | ) | ||||
Amortization of Program Participation Costs | 4,362,000 | 1,190,000 | ||||||
Program Participation Costs expensed in period | $ | 9,472,000 | $ | 7,559,000 | ||||
Aircraft Braking Systems’ gross profit was $80,392,000, or 50.2% of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $64,695,000, or 43.8% of sales for the same period in the prior year. The gross margin increased primarily due to $11,293,000 of inventory purchase accounting charges recorded in 2005 related to the Acquisition, the beneficial overhead absorption effect of fixed costs relating to the higher sales and results of our productivity initiatives. Partially offsetting this increase was a $2,170,000 charge recorded in 2006 related to a retroactive price increase for certain materials purchased over the 12 months ended June 30, 2006, higher amortization of Program Participation Costs (see table above) and intangible assets and inventory purchase accounting charges $0.6 million related to the NASCO acquisition. Engineered Fabrics’ gross profit was $6,643,000, or 19.8% of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $5,632,000, or 18.0% of sales for the same period in the prior year. The gross margin increased primarily due to $791,000 of inventory purchase accounting charges recorded in 2005 related to the Acquisition and the beneficial overhead absorption effect of fixed costs attributable to the higher sales volume, partially offset by an unfavorable mix of products sold and higher amortization of intangible assets.
Independent research and development costs increased by $291,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to advancement of our electric brake technology and higher development costs on the Embraer Phenom 100 program, partially offset by decreases on various other research and development programs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $3,369,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to higher legal and consulting fees in addition to insurance premiums, accounting and other compliance and administrative expenses as a result of K&F Holdings being a publicly traded company since August 2005, as well as higher sales commissions and the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in 2006 which resulted in $400,000 of stock-based compensation expense.
Amortization of intangible assets decreased by $3,313,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with the same period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to the finalization of the allocation of purchase price relating to the Acquisition during the fourth quarter of 2005. This resulted in the reallocation of approximately $126.0 million from intangible assets to Program Participation Costs, both of which have an estimated useful life of 25 years. The amortization of Program Participation Costs is charged to cost of sales while the amortization of certain intangible assets is charged to operating expense. In addition, during the second quarter of 2006, the Company re-evaluated the classification of the amortization of its intangible assets and concluded that certain of this amortization should have been in cost of sales instead of operating expense. This revision will have no effect on net income, but gross profit will be reduced by approximately $1.8 million per year over the 18 year life of the assets, and amortization of intangible assets will be reduced by the same amount. This change was made prospectively and, therefore, prior periods will not be revised for comparative purposes as the effect of the revision does not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Our net interest expense decreased by $3,598,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with the same period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to gains related to fair value adjustments for our interest rate swaps, interest earned on the settlement of past due amounts owed under a licensing agreement, lower amortization of debt issuance costs and a lower average outstanding balance on our senior term loans, partially offset by higher interest rates on the senior term loans.
22
Table of Contents
Our effective tax rate of 35.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 equals the statutory rate of 35.0% as a result of state and local income taxes, offset by tax benefits derived from export sales and domestic production activities. Our effective tax rate of 33.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 differs from the statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to tax benefits derived from export sales, partially offset by state, local and foreign taxes and an increase in our tax reserves.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005
Our net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $102,653,000, reflecting an increase of $12,351,000, compared with $90,302,000 for the same period in the prior year. This increase was due to higher sales at Aircraft Braking Systems of $10,497,000 and at Engineered Fabrics of $1,854,000.
Military sales at Aircraft Braking Systems increased $7,425,000, primarily due to higher sales of wheels and brakes on the Boeing B-1B and the Lockheed Martin C-130 programs and due to the settlement with a customer for approximately $2.4 million relating to past due amounts owed to us by them under a licensing agreement. General aviation sales at Aircraft Braking Systems increased $1,642,000, primarily due to higher sales of wheels and brakes on Gulfstream aircraft. Commercial transport sales at Aircraft Braking Systems increased $1,430,000, primarily due to higher sales of brake control systems on theBoeing MD-11 program and higher sales of wheels and brakes on the FokkerFO-100, EmbraerERJ-170 and BoeingMD-90 programs, partially offset by lower sales of wheels and brakes on the Boeing DC-9 and DC-10 and the Bombardier CRJ-100/200 and CRJ-700 programs. Sales at Engineered Fabrics increased $1,854,000 primarily due to higher military sales of fuel tanks for the BoeingAH-64, Lockheed Martin C-130 and various other fuel tanks programs, partially offset by lower sales on the Sikorsky UH-60 Blackhawk and Northrop Grumman T-38 programs.
Our gross profit increased by $3,071,000 to $45,174,000, or 44.0% of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $42,103,000, or 46.6% of sales for the same period in the prior year. The increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to the higher sales volume and results of our productivity initiatives, partially offset by a $2,170,000 charge recorded in 2006 related to a retroactive price increase for certain materials purchased over the 12 months ended June 30, 2006, higher amortization of Program Participation Costs (see table below) and intangible assets and inventory purchase accounting charges of $0.6 million related to the NASCO acquisition.
The following table provides additional information detailing Program Participation Costs:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Gross Program Participation Costs | $ | 11,306,000 | $ | 10,861,000 | ||||
Amount capitalized during period | (8,748,000 | ) | (7,704,000 | ) | ||||
Amortization of Program Participation Costs | 2,219,000 | 631,000 | ||||||
Program Participation Costs expensed in period | $ | 4,777,000 | $ | 3,788,000 | ||||
Aircraft Braking Systems’ gross profit was $41,417,000, or 49.2% of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $38,441,000, or 52.1% of sales for the same period in the prior year. The gross margin decreased primarily due to a $2,170,000 charge recorded in 2006 related to a retroactive price increase for certain materials purchased over the 12 months ended June 30, 2006, higher amortization of Program Participation Costs (see table above) and intangible assets and inventory purchase accounting charges of $0.6 million related to the NASCO acquisition, partially offset by the beneficial overhead absorption effect of fixed costs relating to the higher sales and results of our productivity initiatives. Engineered Fabrics’ gross profit was $3,757,000, or 20.4% of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $3,662,000, or 22.1% of sales for the same period in the prior year. The gross margin decreased primarily due to an unfavorable mix of products sold and higher amortization of intangible assets, partially offset by the beneficial overhead absorption effect attributable to the higher sales volume.
Independent research and development costs increased by $85,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to advancement of our electric brake technology and higher development costs on the Embraer Phenom 100 program, partially offset by decreases on various other research and development programs.
23
Table of Contents
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $3,506,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to higher legal and consulting fees in addition to insurance premiums, accounting and other compliance and administrative expenses as a result of K&F Holdings being a publicly traded company since August 2005, as well as higher sales commissions and the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in 2006 which resulted in $241,000 of stock-based compensation expense.
Amortization of intangible assets decreased by $2,009,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with the same period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to the finalization of the allocation of purchase price relating to the Acquisition during the fourth quarter of 2005. This resulted in the reallocation of approximately $126.0 million from intangible assets to Program Participation Costs, both of which have an estimated useful life of 25 years. The amortization of Program Participation Costs is charged to cost of sales while the amortization of certain intangible assets is charged to operating expense. In addition, during the second quarter of 2006, the Company re-evaluated the classification of the amortization of its intangible assets and concluded that certain of this amortization should have been in cost of sales instead of operating expense. This revision will have no effect on net income, but gross profit will be reduced by approximately $1.8 million per year over the 18 year life of the assets, and amortization of intangible assets will be reduced by the same amount. This change was made prospectively and, therefore, prior periods will not be revised for comparative purposes as the effect of the revision does not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Our net interest expense decreased by $1,975,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with the same period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to gains related to fair value adjustments for our interest rate swaps, interest earned on the settlement of past due amounts owed under a licensing agreement, lower amortization of debt issuance costs and a lower average outstanding balance on our senior term loans, partially offset by higher interest rates on the senior term loans.
Our effective tax rate of 35.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 equals the statutory rate of 35.0% as a result of state and local income taxes, offset by tax benefits derived from export sales and domestic production activities. Our effective tax rate of 33.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 differs from the statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to tax benefits derived from export sales, partially offset by state, local and foreign taxes and an increase in our tax reserves.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $16.5 million at June 30, 2006, compared with $34.7 million at December 31, 2005. Our total debt was $751.6 million at June 30, 2006 and $766.6 million at December 31, 2005. We repaid $15.0 million of debt and we acquired NASCO for $16.0 million in cash and a $3.0 million note during the six months ended June 30, 2006. We had $48.4 million (which is net of letters of credit of $1.6 million) available to borrow under our $50 million revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2006, we had outstanding $315.0 million of 73/4% notes, $0.6 million of 95/8% notes and $436.0 million of variable rate indebtedness which had a weighted average interest rate of 7.11%. On July 24, 2006, we made a $7.0 million voluntary prepayment on our term loan borrowings.
We expect that our principal use of funds for the next several years will be to pay interest and principal on indebtedness, fund capital expenditures, make program participation investments and fund strategic acquisitions. Our primary source of funds for conducting our business activities and servicing our indebtedness has been cash generated from operations.
Our management believes that our cash on hand, together with cash from operations and, if required, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient for our short-term and long-term cash requirements.
The credit facility contains certain covenants and events of default that limit us and our subsidiaries from among other things, incurring additional indebtedness, paying dividends, creating liens, making asset sales, making certain restricted payments, making capital expenditures, creating guarantee obligations, creating material lease obligations and limits on the amount of acquisitions we may make. The credit facility also contains certain financial ratio requirements, including a cash interest coverage ratio and a leverage ratio. We were in compliance with all debt covenants at June 30, 2006.
Our contractual obligations are detailed in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. As of June 30, 2006, our contractual obligations have not materially changed from December 31, 2005.
24
Table of Contents
Cash Flows
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $25,107,000 compared with $36,483,000 for the same period in the prior year, a decrease of $11,376,000. Our cash flows from operating activities decreased from the prior year primarily due to the receipt of a $15,425,000 income tax refund received in 2005 relating to expenses incurred in connection with the Acquisition (this item is included in other current liabilities on the statement of cash flows during the six months ended June 30, 2005), a higher increase in inventory and higher interest payments, partially offset by higher net income in 2006. The increase in the inventory balance at June 30, 2006 versus December 31, 2005 primarily relates to inventory built to support higher projected sales over the remainder of the year and timing as a result of the mix of products sold versus inventory on hand.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, net cash used in investing activities amounted to $28,320,000 versus $17,811,000 for the same period in the prior year, an increase of $10,509,000. This increase was due to the acquisition of NASCO for $16,016,000 and capital expenditures of $12,304,000 primarily relating to our new carbon manufacturing facility in Danville, Kentucky, versus the payment of $14,682,000 of deferred purchase price related to the Acquisition and capital expenditures of $3,129,000 in the prior year.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, net cash used in financing activities amounted to $15,000,000 versus $18,980,000 for the same period in the prior year. Both amounts primarily relate to the payment of indebtedness.
Current Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or “FASB” issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of SFAS No. 109” or, “FIN 48”, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that we recognize in our financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not to be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for us at the beginning of 2007, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — An Amendment of SFAS Nos. 133 and 140.” SFAS No. 155 simplifies the accounting for certain hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would have required bifurcation. SFAS No. 155 also eliminates the interim guidance in SFAS No. 133, which provides that beneficial interest in securitized financial assets are not subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, which for us will be as of the beginning of 2007. We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Changes
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of, and account for stock-based compensation in accordance with, SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” which replaced SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. We elected the modified-prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. The valuation provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) apply to new grants and to grants that were outstanding as of the effective date and are subsequently modified. Compensation expense for unvested grants that were outstanding as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost estimated for the SFAS No. 123 pro forma disclosures.
The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our stock-based compensation assumptions and expenses, including pro forma disclosures for prior periods as if we had recorded stock-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R).
25
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We had $315.6 million of total fixed rate debt and $436.0 million of variable rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2006. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest that varies with the federal funds rate. Interest rate changes generally do not affect the market value of such debt, but do impact the amount of our interest payments and, therefore, our future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. Assuming other variables remain constant, including levels of indebtedness, a 10% increase in interest rates on our variable debt would have an estimated impact on pre-tax earnings and cash flows for the next twelve months of approximately $1.5 million.
As a requirement of our credit facility, we entered into the following interest rate contracts:
• | a 3 month LIBOR interest rate cap at 6% from December 2005 to December 2007 for an increasing notional amount starting at $144.6 million, increasing to $161.2 million; | |
• | a swap arrangement for a portion of our term loans from a variable 3 month LIBOR interest rate to a fixed rate of 4.0375%, beginning January 24, 2006. The notional amount of the swap is initially $95.4 million and declines to $78.8 million on January 24, 2008 at the termination of the swap agreement; and | |
• | a swap arrangement for a portion of our term loans from a variable 3 month LIBOR interest rate to a fixed rate of 4.506%, beginning January 24, 2006. The notional amount of the swap is initially $47.7 million and declines to $39.4 million on January 24, 2008 at the termination of the swap agreement. |
The three month LIBOR interest rate at June 30, 2006 was 5.48%.
The carrying amount of the interest rate cap was recorded as a long-term asset of $161,000 and $87,000 on the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The change in its fair value of $40,000 and $(235,000) was recorded in the consolidated statements of income as a reduction to interest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and as an increase during the three months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The change in its fair value of $74,000 and $(264,000) was recorded in the consolidated statements of income as a reduction to interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and as an increase during the six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
The fair values of the interest rate swaps at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $2.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively, which were recorded as long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps was recorded as a reduction to interest expense in the consolidated statements of income of $0.5 million and $0.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $1.4 million and $0.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We received payment of $153,000 from the counterparties to the interest rate swaps during the three months ended June 30, 2006, which was recorded as interest income in the consolidated statements of income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. No payments have been received prior to this.
We have no other derivative financial instruments.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2006. Based upon that evaluation and subject to the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures provided reasonable assurance that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to accomplish their objectives.
26
Table of Contents
In addition, there was no change to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
(a) Exhibits
31 | .1 | — | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) andRule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. | |||
31 | .2 | — | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) andRule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. | |||
32 | .1 | — | Certification of Chief Executive Office pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
32 | .2 | — | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Items 1, 1A, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
K&F INDUSTRIES, INC.
Registrant
/s/ DIRKSON R. CHARLES
Dirkson R. Charles
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
and Registrant’s Authorized Officer
Dated: August 14, 2006
28