UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-6642
DREYFUS CONNECTICUT INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)
c/o The Dreyfus Corporation |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, New York 10166 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
Mark N. Jacobs, Esq. |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, New York 10166 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 922-6000 |
Date of fiscal year end: | 3/31 | |
Date of reporting period: | 9/30/04 |
FORM N-CSR | ||||
Item 1. | Reports to Stockholders. |
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | ||
THE FUND | ||
2 | Letter from the Chairman | |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance | |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses | |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses | |
With Those of Other Funds | ||
7 | Statement of Investments | |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities | |
13 | Statement of Operations | |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets | |
15 | Financial Highlights | |
16 | Notes to Financial Statements | |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | ||
Back Cover |
Dreyfus Connecticut | ||||
Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | The | Fund |
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN
Dear Shareholder: |
This semiannual report for Dreyfus Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund covers the six-month period from April 1, 2004, through September 30, 2004. Inside, you’ll find valuable information about how the fund was managed during the reporting period, including a discussion with the fund’s portfolio manager, James Welch.
The U.S.economy has alternated between signs of strength and weakness, causing heightened volatility in the municipal bond market.Although the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) raised short-term interest rates three times during the reporting period, bond prices generally have held up better than many analysts expected, as investors apparently have revised their economic expectations in response to the insurgency in Iraq, higher energy prices and some disappointing labor statistics.
The Fed’s move to a less accommodative monetary policy may be signaling the beginning of a new phase in the economic cycle. At times such as these, when market conditions are in a period of transition, we believe it is especially important for investors to stay in close touch with their financial advisors.Your financial advisor can help you rebalance your portfolio in a way that is designed to respond to the challenges and opportunities of today’s changing investment environment.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
The Dreyfus Corporation October 15, 2004 |
2 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
James Welch, Portfolio Manager |
How did Dreyfus Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund perform relative to its benchmark?
For the six-month period ended September 30, 2004, the fund achieved a total return of 0.68% .1 In comparison, the Lehman Brothers 7-Year Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of 0.98% for the same period.2 In addition, the average total return for all funds reported in the Lipper Other States Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds category was 0.67% .3
Despite rising interest rates and heightened market volatility during the reporting period, municipal bond prices ended the reporting period little changed from where they began.The fund’s return was in line with its Lipper category average, primarily due to strong income returns from its core holdings of seasoned tax-exempt securities. However, the fund underperformed the Index, primarily because the Index does not reflect fund fees and expenses.
What is the fund’s investment approach?
The fund seeks as high a level of income exempt from federal and Connecticut state income taxes as is consistent with the preservation of capital.
To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds that provide income exempt from federal and Connecticut state personal income taxes.The dollar-weighted average maturity of the fund’s portfolio ranges between three and 10 years. Although the fund currently intends to invest only in investment-grade municipal bonds, or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus, it has the ability to invest up to 20% of its assets in municipal bonds of below investment-grade credit quality.
The portfolio manager may buy and sell bonds based on credit quality, market outlook and yield potential. In selecting municipal bonds for investment, the portfolio manager may assess the current interest-rate environment and the municipal bond’s potential volatility in different
The Fund 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued) |
rate environments.The portfolio manager focuses on bonds with the potential to offer attractive current income, typically looking for bonds that can provide consistently attractive current yields or that are trading at competitive market prices.A portion of the fund’s assets may be allocated to “discount” bonds, which are bonds that sell at a price below their face value, or to “premium” bonds, which are bonds that sell at a price above their face value.The fund’s allocation to either discount bonds or to premium bonds will change along with the portfolio manager’s changing views of the current interest-rate and market envi-ronment.The portfolio manager also may look to select bonds that are most likely to obtain attractive prices when sold.
What other factors influenced the fund’s performance?
Municipal bonds generally continued to rally when the reporting period began, supported by persistently low inflation in a gradually recovering economy. In fact, the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) had reassured investors over the preceding months that it could be “patient” before moving away from the aggressively accommodative monetary policy it had adopted in the fall of 2001.
In April 2004, however, surprisingly strong monthly job data and surging energy prices suggested that long-dormant inflationary pressures might be resurfacing.As investors’ economic and inflation expectations rose, so did volatility in the municipal bond market. In fact, the market’s springtime decline rivaled the one that took place during the summer of 2003, causing municipal bonds to give back many of their previous gains. Market volatility was particularly severe among intermediate-term securities.
To forestall potential inflationary pressures, the Fed raised short-term interest rates three times during the second half of the reporting period, driving the overnight federal funds rate to 1.75% . Soon after the Fed’s initial rate hike, however, inflationary pressures appeared to wane as the economy hit a “soft patch” and employment growth moderated. As a result, longer-term municipal bonds rallied over the summer even as short-term interest rates rose, generally benefiting the prices of intermediate-term securities.
4 |
In addition, Connecticut municipal bonds were influenced by the state’s improving fiscal condition in the recovering economy. Higher tax revenues enabled the state to end its 2004 fiscal year with a small budget surplus, which was used to replenish its rainy day fund. Although the state experienced political turmoil culminating in the resignation of Governor Rowland, these developments had no apparent effect on the state’s tax-exempt bonds.
In this environment, there was little trading activity in the fund. It did not make sense to us to sell the fund’s existing holdings, most of which carried higher yields than were available during the reporting period. Those core holdings continued to generate attractive levels of tax-exempt income, helping the fund to produce higher returns than its Lipper category average.What few moves we made were designed to reduce the fund’s average duration to make it less sensitive to the potentially eroding effects of further interest rate increases.
What is the fund’s current strategy?
We have continued to position the fund conservatively by maintaining a relatively short average duration and maintaining the fund’s high overall credit rating. In addition, we have attempted to diversify the fund more broadly among bonds of various maturities.We believe that these strategies are prudent until the economy’s strength and the Fed’s intentions become clearer.
October 15, 2004 |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid. Past performance is no | |
guarantee of future results. Share price, yield and investment return fluctuate such that upon | ||
redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Income may be subject | ||
to state and local taxes for non-Connecticut residents, and some income may be subject to the | ||
federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) for certain investors. Capital gains, if any, are fully | ||
taxable. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of fund expenses by The Dreyfus | ||
Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect that may be extended, terminated or modified at | ||
any time. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s return would have been lower. | ||
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital | |
gain distributions.The Lehman Brothers 7-Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged total | ||
return performance benchmark for the investment-grade, geographically unrestricted 7-year tax- | ||
exempt bond market, consisting of municipal bonds with maturities of 6-8 years. Index returns do | ||
not reflect the fees and expenses associated with operating a mutual fund. | ||
3 | Source: Lipper Inc. |
The Fund 5 |
STATEMENT U N D E R S TA OF INVESTMENTS N D I N G YO U R F U N D ’ S E X P E N S E S ( U n a u d i t e d )
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses |
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund from April 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming actual returns for the six months ended September 30, 2004
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | $ 3.92 | |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,006.80 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended September 30, 2004
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | $ 3.95 | |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,021.16 |
- Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .78%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) |
Principal | ||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments—98.3% | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||
Connecticut—73.2% | ||||
Bridgeport 6%, 9/1/2006 (Insured; AMBAC) | 1,750,000 | 1,882,895 | ||
Connecticut: | ||||
5.25, 3/15/2010 (Insured; MBIA) | 5,100,000 | 5,621,883 | ||
5.25%, 12/15/2010 | 50,000 | 56,263 | ||
5.375%, 12/15/2010 (Insured; MBIA) | 4,100,000 | 4,652,352 | ||
8.601%, 12/15/2010 | 1,250,000 a,b | 1,563,187 | ||
5.75%, 6/15/2011 | 30,000 | 34,267 | ||
9.601%, 6/15/2011 | 1,500,000 a,b | 1,926,675 | ||
5.125%, 11/15/2013 | 1,500,000 | 1,673,400 | ||
Airport Revenue (Bradley International Airport) | ||||
5.25%, 10/1/2017 (Insured; FGIC) | 2,275,000 | 2,431,747 | ||
Special Obligation Rate Reduction | ||||
5%, 12/30/2010 | 3,500,000 | 3,899,245 | ||
Special Tax Obligation Revenue | ||||
(Transportation Infrastructure): | ||||
5.25%, 9/1/2007 | 1,115,000 | 1,212,641 | ||
5.25%, 9/1/2007 (Insured; MBIA) | 1,360,000 | 1,480,306 | ||
5.375%, 9/1/2008 | 2,500,000 | 2,769,775 | ||
5.50%, 11/1/2012 (Insured; FSA) | 4,180,000 | 4,841,025 | ||
5.375%, 7/1/2013 (Insured; FSA) | 1,000,000 | 1,135,230 | ||
Connecticut Clean Water Fund, Revenue | ||||
5.125%, 7/1/2007 (Insured; MBIA) | 2,000,000 | 2,036,960 | ||
Connecticut Development Authority: | ||||
First Mortgage Gross Revenue | ||||
(Health Care Project): | ||||
(Church Homes, Inc.) 5.70%, 4/1/2012 | 1,990,000 | 2,014,218 | ||
(Elim Park Baptist) 5.375%, 12/1/2011 | 1,765,000 | 1,809,249 | ||
Pollution Control Revenue (United Illuminating) | ||||
3%, 2/1/2009 | 2,500,000 | 2,489,050 | ||
Revenue (Duncaster Project) 5.50%, 8/1/2011 | 2,405,000 | 2,682,369 | ||
Connecticut Health and Educational | ||||
Facilities Authority, Revenue: | ||||
(Greenwich Hospital) | ||||
5.75%, 7/1/2006 (Insured; MBIA) | 1,000,000 | 1,066,120 | ||
(Hospital for Special Care) 5.125% 7/1/2007 | 1,100,000 | 1,093,092 | ||
(Nursing Home Program— | ||||
3030 Park Fairfield Health Center) | ||||
6.25%, 11/1/2021 | 2,500,000 | 2,710,300 | ||
(Saint Mary’s Hospital) 6%, 7/1/2005 | 1,070,000 | 1,080,679 | ||
(Stamford Hospital) | ||||
5.20%, 7/1/2007 (Insured; MBIA) | 2,210,000 | 2,367,838 |
The Fund 7 |
S T A T E M E N T O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) (continued)
Principal | ||||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
Connecticut (continued) | ||||||
Connecticut Health and Educational | ||||||
Facilities Authority, Revenue (continued): | ||||||
(University of New Haven): | ||||||
6%, 7/1/2006 | 200,000 | 207,676 | ||||
6.625%, 7/1/2016 | 2,000,000 | 2,093,200 | ||||
(Windham Community Memorial Hospital) | ||||||
5.75%, 7/1/2011 | 675,000 | 712,510 | ||||
(Yale—New Haven Hospital) | ||||||
5.50%, 7/1/2013 (Insured; MBIA) | 1,000,000 | 1,075,010 | ||||
Connecticut Higher Education Supplemental Loan | ||||||
Authority, Revenue | ||||||
(Family Education Loan Program): | ||||||
5.70%, 11/15/2004 | 635,000 | 635,851 | ||||
5.80%, 11/15/2005 | 855,000 | 856,385 | ||||
5.90%, 11/15/2006 | 900,000 | 901,701 | ||||
5.50%, 11/15/2008 | 920,000 | 921,987 | ||||
5.60%, 11/15/2009 | 980,000 | 982,146 | ||||
5.625%, 11/15/2011 (Insured; AMBAC) | 730,000 | 755,915 | ||||
Connecticut Resource Recovery Authority, Revenue: | ||||||
(American Refunding-Fuel Co) | ||||||
5.50%, 11/15/2015 | 3,250,000 | 3,354,845 | ||||
(Bridgeport Resco Co. LP Project) | ||||||
5.375%, 1/1/2006 (Insured; MBIA) | 2,500,000 | 2,610,000 | ||||
(Mid-Connecticut System) | ||||||
5.50%, 11/15/2012 | 1,000,000 | 988,980 | ||||
Fairfield 5.50%, 4/1/2011 | 2,030,000 | 2,321,995 | ||||
Greenwich Housing Authority, MFHR | ||||||
(Greenwich Close) 6.25%, 9/1/2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,023,700 | ||||
Hamden 5.25%, 8/15/2014 (Insured; MBIA) | 1,000,000 | 1,135,070 | ||||
Hartford, Parking System Revenue | ||||||
6.40%, 7/1/2020 | 1,000,000 | 1,044,220 | ||||
Middletown 5%, 4/15/2008 | 1,760,000 | 1,910,498 | ||||
New Canaan: | ||||||
5.25%, 2/1/2009 (Prerefunded 2/1/2006) | 550,000 | c | 575,410 | |||
5.30%, 2/1/2010 (Prerefunded 2/1/2006) | 650,000 | c | 680,459 | |||
New Haven: | ||||||
5.25%, 8/1/2006 (Insured; FGIC) | 1,200,000 | 1,257,168 | ||||
5.25%, 11/1/2011 (Insured; FGIC) | 1,335,000 | 1,507,335 |
8 |
Principal | ||||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
Connecticut (continued) | ||||||
New Haven Air Rights Parking Facility, Revenue | ||||||
5.375%, 12/1/2011 (Insured; AMBAC) | 1,165,000 | 1,318,396 | ||||
Ridgefield 5%, 3/1/2011 | 1,790,000 | 1,994,167 | ||||
South Central Regional Water Authority, | ||||||
Water System Revenue | ||||||
5.25%, 8/1/2011 (Insured; MBIA) | 1,500,000 | 1,694,970 | ||||
University of Connecticut: | ||||||
5.25%, 2/15/2012 | 2,000,000 | 2,263,160 | ||||
5.75%, 3/1/2013 (Insured; FGIC) | ||||||
(Prerefunded 3/1/2010) | 1,850,000 | c | 2,129,350 | |||
Waterbury 5.25, 2/1/2014 (Insured; FSA) | 2,265,000 | d | 2,561,670 | |||
Westport: | ||||||
5%, 8/15/2013 | 1,400,000 | 1,572,032 | ||||
5%, 8/15/2016 | 1,500,000 | 1,672,215 | ||||
5%, 8/15/2017 | 3,470,000 | 3,846,044 | ||||
U.S. Related—25.1% | ||||||
Childrens Trust Fund, Tobacco Settlement Revenue: | ||||||
5.75%, 7/1/2012 (Prerefunded 7/1/2010) | 1,500,000 | c | 1,715,970 | |||
5.75%, 7/1/2013 (Prerefunded 7/1/2010) | 1,300,000 | c | 1,487,174 | |||
5.75%, 7/1/2014 (Prerefunded 7/1/2010) | 4,000,000 | c | 4,575,920 | |||
Guam Economic Development Authority, | ||||||
Tobacco Settlement: | ||||||
0/5.20%, 11/15/2007 | 795,000 | e | 670,869 | |||
5%, 5/15/2022 | 250,000 | 251,120 | ||||
Tobacco Settlement 0/5.45%, 11/15/2007 | 1,445,000 | e | 1,180,493 | |||
Puerto Rico Commonwealth | ||||||
(Public Improvement): | ||||||
5.25%, 7/1/2012 (Insured; FSA) | 2,600,000 | 2,962,310 | ||||
5.25%, 7/1/2014 (Insured; MBIA) | 1,000,000 | 1,146,160 | ||||
5.50%, 7/1/2016 (Insured; FGIC) | 3,270,000 | 3,835,219 | ||||
Puerto Rico Commonwealth Highway & | ||||||
Transportation Authority, Highway Revenue | ||||||
5.50%, 7/1/2016 (Insured; FGIC) | 2,670,000 | 3,131,509 | ||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, | ||||||
Power Revenue: | ||||||
6.125%, 7/1/2009 (Insured; MBIA) | 4,000,000 | 4,619,600 | ||||
5%, 7/1/2011 | 3,000,000 | 3,296,790 |
The Fund |
9 |
S T A T E M E N T O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) (continued)
Principal | ||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||
U.S. Related (continued) | ||||
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Revenue | ||||
Gross Receipts Taxes Loan: | ||||
5.625%, 10/1/2010 | 1,000,000 | 1,073,710 | ||
6.375%, 10/1/2019 | 3,000,000 | 3,410,880 | ||
Senior Lien 5.50%, 10/1/2008 | 1,500,000 | 1,632,765 | ||
Total Long-Term Municipal Investments | ||||
(cost $129,690,600) | 137,125,320 | |||
Short-Term Municipal Investments—2.2% | ||||
Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | ||||
Revenue,VRDN (Quinnipac University) 1.69% | ||||
(cost $3,000,000) | 3,000,000 f | 3,000,000 | ||
Total Investments (cost $132,690,600) | 100.5% | 140,125,320 | ||
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (.5%) | (693,100) | ||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 139,432,220 |
10 |
Summary of Abbreviations | ||||||
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond | MBIA | Municipal Bond Investors | |||
Assurance Corporation | Assurance Insurance | |||||
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance | Corporation | ||||
Company | MFHR | Multi-Family Housing Revenue | ||||
FSA | Financial Security Assurance | VRDN | Variable Rate Demand Notes |
Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | ||||||||
Fitch | or Moody’s | or Standard & Poor’s | Value (%)† | |||||
AAA | Aaa | AAA | 59.6 | |||||
AA | Aa | AA | 16.5 | |||||
A | A | A | 2.9 | |||||
BBB | Baa | BBB | 15.9 | |||||
BB | Ba | BB | 1.6 | |||||
F1 | MIG1/P1 | SP1/A1 | 2.1 | |||||
Not Rated g | Not Rated g | Not Rated g | 1.4 | |||||
100.0 | ||||||||
† | Based on total investments. | |||||||
a | Inverse floater security—the interest rate is subject to change periodically. | |||||||
b | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in | |||||||
transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.These securities have been determined | ||||||||
to be liquid by the Board of Trustees.At September 30, 2004, these securities amounted to $3,489,863 or 2.5% of | ||||||||
the funds net assets. | ||||||||
c | Bonds which are prerefunded are collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used | |||||||
to pay principal and interest on the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. | ||||||||
d | Purchased on a delayed delivery basis. | |||||||
e | Zero coupon until a specified date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective until maturity. | |||||||
f | Securities payable on demand.Variable interest rate—subject to periodic change. | |||||||
g | Security which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to | |||||||
be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund may invest. | ||||||||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 11 |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
September 30, 2004 (Unaudited)
Cost | Value | |||
Assets ($): | ||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | 132,690,600 | 140,125,320 | ||
Cash | 115,344 | |||
Interest receivable | 1,791,942 | |||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 136,078 | |||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 1,104 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 9,300 | |||
142,179,088 | ||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b) | 74,608 | |||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 2,558,008 | |||
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 74,254 | |||
Accrued expenses | 39,998 | |||
2,746,868 | ||||
Net Assets ($) | 139,432,220 | |||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||
Paid-in capital | 132,776,060 | |||
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | 105,772 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (884,332) | |||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 7,434,720 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 139,432,220 | |||
Shares Outstanding | ||||
(unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest authorized) | 9,877,645 | |||
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share—Note 3(d) | 14.12 |
See notes to financial statements. |
12 |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Six Months Ended September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Interest Income | 3,237,334 | |
Expenses: | ||
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 427,115 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(b) | 63,492 | |
Professional fees | 24,188 | |
Custodian fees | 10,948 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(c) | 9,966 | |
Registration fees | 7,065 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 2,873 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 459 | |
Miscellaneous | 8,626 | |
Total Expenses | 554,732 | |
Less—reduction in custody fees due to | ||
earnings credits—Note 1(b) | (2,694) | |
Net Expenses | 552,038 | |
Investment Income—Net | 2,685,296 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (315,332) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (1,653,275) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | (1,968,607) | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 716,689 |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 13 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
September 30, 2004 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | March 31, 2004 | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 2,685,296 | 5,919,169 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (315,332) | (244,747) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | (1,653,275) | 396,878 | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 716,689 | 6,071,300 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | (2,670,014) | (5,892,086) | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold | 6,281,862 | 25,013,243 | ||
Dividends reinvested | 1,981,284 | 4,443,263 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed | (19,167,977) | (35,926,410) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
from Beneficial Interest Transactions | (10,904,831) | (6,469,904) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (12,858,156) | (6,290,690) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 152,290,376 | 158,581,066 | ||
End of Period | 139,432,220 | 152,290,376 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | 105,772 | — | ||
Capital Share Transactions (Shares): | ||||
Shares sold | 449,747 | 1,757,248 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 141,810 | 312,102 | ||
Shares redeemed | (1,373,126) | (2,525,363) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (781,569) | (456,013) |
See notes to financial statements. |
14 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, 2004 | Year Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
(Unaudited) | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 a | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 14.29 | 14.27 | 13.72 | 13.86 | 13.37 | 13.97 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment income—net | .26b | .54b | .57b | .61b | .60 | .58 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (.17) | .02 | .56 | (.15) | .49 | (.60) | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | .09 | .56 | 1.13 | .46 | 1.09 | (.02) | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||
Dividends from investment | ||||||||||||
income—net | (.26) | (.54) | (.58) | (.60) | (.60) | (.58) | ||||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||||
gain on investments | — | — | — | — | (.00)c | — | ||||||
Total Distributions | (.26) | (.54) | (.58) | (.60) | (.60) | (.58) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 14.12 | 14.29 | 14.27 | 13.72 | 13.86 | 13.37 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | .68d | 4.02 | 8.31 | 3.44 | 8.31 | (.10) | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses to | ||||||||||||
average net assets | .78e | .78 | .78 | .77 | .81 | .82 | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses to | ||||||||||||
average net assets | .78e | .78 | .78 | .77 | .79 | .79 | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 3.77e | 3.82 | 4.05 | 4.38 | 4.46 | 4.29 | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 10.69d | 23.49 | 21.13 | 28.50 | 34.90 | 13.33 | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 139,432 | 152,290 | 158,581 | 138,003 | 135,571 | 125,702 |
a As required, effective April 1, 2001, the fund has adopted the provisions of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began amortizing discount or premium on a scientific basis for debt securities.The effect of this change for the period ended March 31, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $.01 and decrease net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share by $.01 and increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets from 4.35% to 4.38% . Per share data and ratios/supplemental data for periods prior to April 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation. b Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. c Amount represents less than $.01 per share. d Not annualized. e Annualized.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a non-diversified open-end management investment company.The fund’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income exempt from federal and Connecticut state income taxes as is consistent with the preservation of capital.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”) serves as the fund’s investment adviser. The Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation (“Mellon Financial”). Dreyfus Service Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the “Service”) approved by the Board of Trustees. Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are carried at fair value as deter-
16 |
mined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of:yields or prices of municipal securities of comparable quality,coupon, maturity and type;indications as to values from dealers;and general market conditions. Options and financial futures on municipal and U.S. Treasury securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such securities are primarily traded or at the last sales price on the national securities market on each business day.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gain and loss from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of discount and premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.
The fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby the fund receives earnings credits from the custodian when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund follows an investment policy of investing primarily in municipal obligations of one state. Economic changes affecting the state and certain of its public bodies and municipalities may affect the ability of issuers within the state to pay interest on, or repay principal of, municipal obligations held by the fund.
(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gain, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent
The Fund 17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
that net realized capital gain can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gain.Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $564,293 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to March 31, 2004. If not applied, $42,968 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2008, $276,703 expires in fiscal 2009 and $244,622 expires in fiscal 2012.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, was as follows: tax exempt income $5,892,086. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Line of Credit: |
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $350 million redemption credit facility (the “Facility”) to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowings. During the period ended September 30, 2004, the fund did not borrow under the Facility.
18 |
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .60 of 1% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
(b) Under the fund’s Shareholder Services Plan, the fund reimburses the Distributor an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25 of 1% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets for certain allocated expenses of providing personal services and/or maintaining shareholder accounts.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. During the period ended September 30, 2004, the fund was charged $30,943 pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended September 30, 2004, the fund was charged $21,049 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.
The components of Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $69,002, shareholder services plan fees $1,020 and transfer agency per account fees $4,586.
(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
The Fund 19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
(d) A 1% redemption fee is charged and retained by the fund on shares redeemed within thirty days following the date of issuance, including redemptions made through use of the fund exchange privilege. During the period ended September 30, 2004, redemption fees charged and retained by the fund amounted to $682.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions: |
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended September 30, 2004, amounted to $14,856,732 and $22,608,804, respectively.
At September 30, 2004, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $7,434,720, consisting of $7,644,354 gross unrealized appreciation and $209,634 gross unrealized depreciation.
At September 30, 2004, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
NOTE 5—Legal Matters: |
Two class actions have been filed against Mellon Financial, Mellon Bank, N.A., Dreyfus, Founders Asset Management LLC and the directors of all or substantially all of the Dreyfus funds, on behalf of a purported class and derivatively on behalf of said funds, alleging violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and the common law. The complaints alleged, among other things, (i) that 12b-1 fees and directed brokerage were improperly used to pay brokers to recommend Dreyfus funds over other funds, (ii) that such payments were not disclosed to investors, (iii) that economies of scale and soft-dollar benefits were not passed on to investors and (iv) that 12b-1 fees charged to certain funds that were closed to new investors were also improper. The complaints sought compensatory
20 |
and punitive damages, rescission of the advisory contracts and an accounting and restitution of any unlawful fees, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. On April 22, 2004, the actions were consolidated under the caption In re Dreyfus Mutual Funds Fee Litigation, and a consolidated amended complaint was filed on September 13, 2004.While adding new parties and claims under state and federal law, the allegations in the consolidated amended complaint essentially track the allegations in the prior complaints pertaining to 12b-1 fees, directed brokerage, soft dollars and revenue sharing. Dreyfus and the funds believe the allegations to be totally without merit and intend to defend the action vigorously.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed against the defendants in the future. Neither Dreyfus nor the Dreyfus funds believe that any of the pending actions will have a material adverse effect on the Dreyfus funds or Dreyfus’ ability to perform its contracts with the Dreyfus funds.
The Fund 21 |
For More | Information | |
Dreyfus Connecticut | Transfer Agent & | |
Intermediate Municipal | Dividend Disbursing Agent | |
Bond Fund | Dreyfus Transfer, Inc. | |
200 Park Avenue | 200 Park Avenue | |
New York, NY 10166 | New York, NY 10166 | |
Manager | Distributor | |
The Dreyfus Corporation | Dreyfus Service Corporation | |
200 Park Avenue | 200 Park Avenue | |
New York, NY 10166 | New York, NY 10166 | |
Custodian | ||
The Bank of New York | ||
One Wall Street | ||
New York, NY 10286 | ||
Telephone 1-800-645-6561 |
Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.dreyfus.com A description of the policies and procedures that the fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, and information regarding how the fund voted these proxies for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2004, is available through the fund’s website at http://www.dreyfus.com and on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The description of the policies and procedures is also available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.
Beginning with the fund’s fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004, the fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q will be available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
®
© 2004 Dreyfus Service Corporation 0914SA0904
Item 2. | Code of Ethics. | |
Not applicable. | ||
Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. | |
Not applicable. | ||
Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. | |
Not applicable. | ||
Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. | |
Not applicable. | ||
Item 6. | [Reserved] | |
Item 7. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management | |
Investment Companies. | ||
Not applicable. | ||
Item 8. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies | |
and Affiliated Purchasers. | ||
Not applicable. | ||
Item 9. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
The Fund has a Nominating Committee, which is responsible for selecting and nominating persons for election or appointment by the Fund’s Board as Board members. The Committee has adopted a Nominating Committee Charter (“Charter”). Pursuant to the Charter, the Committee will consider recommendations for nominees from shareholders submitted to the Secretary of the Fund, c/o The Dreyfus Corporation Legal Department, 200 Park Avenue, 8th Floor West, New York, New York 10166. A nomination submission must include information regarding the recommended nominee as specified in the Charter. This information includes all information relating to a recommended nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxy statements for the election of Board members, as well as information sufficient to evaluate the factors to be considered by the Committee, including character and integrity, business and professional experience, and whether the person has the ability to apply sound and independent business judgment and would act in the interests of the Fund and its shareholders. Nomination submissions are required to be accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the shareholders, and such additional information must be provided regarding the recommended nominee as reasonably requested by the Committee.
-2- |
Item 10. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recently ended fiscal half-year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 11. Exhibits.
(a)(1) | not applicable | |
(a)(2) | Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) | |
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. | ||
(a)(3) | Not applicable. | |
(b) | Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) | |
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
-3- |
SIGNATURES |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DREYFUS CONNECTICUT INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
By: | /s/ Stephen E. Canter | |
Stephen E. Canter | ||
President | ||
Date: | November 23, 2004 | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of | ||
1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the | ||
capacities and on the dates indicated. | ||
By: | /s/ Stephen E. Canter | |
Stephen E. Canter | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: | November 23, 2004 | |
By: | /s/ James Windels | |
James Windels | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
Date: | November 23, 2004 | |
EXHIBIT INDEX | ||
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a- | ||
2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT) | ||
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a- | ||
2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT) |
-4- |