Document and Entity Information
Document and Entity Information - USD ($) | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Feb. 25, 2019 | Jun. 30, 2018 | |
Document and Entity Information | |||
Entity Registrant Name | LTC PROPERTIES INC | ||
Entity Central Index Key | 887,905 | ||
Document Type | 10-K | ||
Document Period End Date | Dec. 31, 2018 | ||
Amendment Flag | false | ||
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | ||
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer | Yes | ||
Entity Voluntary Filers | No | ||
Entity Current Reporting Status | Yes | ||
Entity Filer Category | Large Accelerated Filer | ||
Entity Public Float | $ 1,667,067,000 | ||
Entity Shell Company | false | ||
Entity Small Business | false | ||
Entity Emerging Growth Company | false | ||
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 39,713,946 | ||
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2,018 | ||
Document Fiscal Period Focus | FY |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 |
Investments: | ||
Land | $ 125,358 | $ 124,041 |
Buildings and improvements | 1,290,352 | 1,262,335 |
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (312,959) | (304,117) |
Operating real estate property, net | 1,102,751 | 1,082,259 |
Properties held-for-sale, net of accumulated depreciation: 2018—$1,916; 2017—$1,916 | 3,830 | 3,830 |
Real property investments, net | 1,106,581 | 1,086,089 |
Mortgage loans receivable, net of loan loss reserve: 2018—$2,447; 2017—$2,255 | 242,939 | 223,907 |
Real estate investments, net | 1,349,520 | 1,309,996 |
Notes receivable, net of loan loss reserve: 2018—$128; 2017—$166 | 12,715 | 16,402 |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 30,615 | 29,898 |
Investments, net | 1,392,850 | 1,356,296 |
Other assets: | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2,656 | 5,213 |
Restricted cash | 2,108 | |
Debt issue costs related to bank borrowings | 2,989 | 810 |
Interest receivable | 20,732 | 15,050 |
Straight-line rent receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2018—$746; 2017—$814 | 73,857 | 64,490 |
Lease incentives | 14,443 | 21,481 |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 3,985 | 2,230 |
Total assets | 1,513,620 | 1,465,570 |
LIABILITIES | ||
Bank borrowings | 112,000 | 96,500 |
Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issue costs: 2018—$938; 2017—$1,131 | 533,029 | 571,002 |
Accrued interest | 4,180 | 5,276 |
Accrued incentives and earn-outs | 8,916 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 31,440 | 25,228 |
Total liabilities | 680,649 | 706,922 |
Stockholders’ equity: | ||
Common stock: $0.01 par value; 60,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2018—39,657; 2017—39,570 | 397 | 396 |
Capital in excess of par value | 862,712 | 856,992 |
Cumulative net income | 1,255,764 | 1,100,783 |
Cumulative distributions | (1,293,383) | (1,203,011) |
Total LTC Properties, Inc. stockholders’ equity | 825,490 | 755,160 |
Non-controlling interests | 7,481 | 3,488 |
Total equity | 832,971 | 758,648 |
Total liabilities and equity | $ 1,513,620 | $ 1,465,570 |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Pa
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | |
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | |
Properties held-for-sale, accumulated depreciation | $ 1,916 | $ 1,916 |
Mortgage loans receivable, loan loss reserve | 2,447 | 2,255 |
Notes receivable, loan loss reserve | 128 | 166 |
Straight-line rent receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts | $ 746 | $ 814 |
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ 0.01 | $ 0.01 |
Common stock, shares authorized | 60,000 | 60,000 |
Common stock, shares issued | 39,657 | 39,570 |
Common stock, shares outstanding | 39,657 | 39,570 |
Senior Unsecured Notes | ||
Debt issue costs, net | $ 938 | $ 1,131 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Revenues: | |||
Rental income | $ 135,405 | $ 137,657 | $ 133,527 |
Interest income from mortgage loans | 28,200 | 26,769 | 27,321 |
Interest and other income | 5,040 | 3,639 | 735 |
Total revenues | 168,645 | 168,065 | 161,583 |
Expenses: | |||
Interest expense | 30,196 | 29,949 | 26,442 |
Depreciation and amortization | 37,555 | 37,610 | 35,932 |
Impairment charges | 1,880 | 766 | |
Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts | 87 | (206) | 457 |
Transaction costs | 84 | 56 | 179 |
General and administrative expenses | 19,193 | 17,513 | 17,412 |
Total expenses | 87,115 | 86,802 | 81,188 |
Other operating income: | |||
Gain on sale of real estate, net | 70,682 | 3,814 | 3,582 |
Operating income | 152,212 | 85,077 | 83,977 |
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures | 2,864 | 2,263 | 1,138 |
Net income | 155,076 | 87,340 | 85,115 |
Income allocated to non-controlling interests | (95) | ||
Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. | 154,981 | 87,340 | 85,115 |
Income allocated to participating securities | (625) | (362) | (385) |
Net income available to common stockholders | $ 154,356 | $ 86,978 | $ 84,730 |
Earnings per common share: | |||
Basic (in dollars per share) | $ 3.91 | $ 2.21 | $ 2.21 |
Diluted (in dollars per share) | $ 3.89 | $ 2.20 | $ 2.21 |
Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common share: | |||
Basic (in shares) | 39,477 | 39,409 | 38,388 |
Diluted (in shares) | 39,839 | 39,637 | 38,597 |
Comprehensive Income: | |||
Net income | $ 155,076 | $ 87,340 | $ 85,115 |
Reclassification adjustment | (47) | ||
Comprehensive income | $ 155,076 | $ 87,340 | $ 85,068 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUI
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands | Parent | Common Stock | Capital in Excess of Par Value | Cumulative Net Income | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Cumulative Distributions | Non-controlling Interests | Total |
Balance at beginning of period at Dec. 31, 2015 | $ 659,202 | $ 375 | $ 758,676 | $ 928,328 | $ 47 | $ (1,028,224) | $ 659,202 | |
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2015 | 37,548 | |||||||
Equity activity | ||||||||
Reclassification adjustment | (47) | $ (47) | (47) | |||||
Issuance of common stock | 78,136 | $ 16 | 78,120 | 78,136 | ||||
Issuance of common stock (in shares) | 1,643 | |||||||
Issuance of restricted stock | (41) | $ 1 | (42) | (41) | ||||
Issuance of restricted stock (in shares) | 73 | |||||||
Net income | 85,115 | 85,115 | 85,115 | |||||
Vesting of restricted stock | 4,265 | 4,265 | 4,265 | |||||
Vested stock options | 15 | 15 | 15 | |||||
Stock option exercises | 159 | 159 | 159 | |||||
Stock option exercises (in shares) | 7 | |||||||
Common stock cash distributions | (84,568) | (84,568) | (84,568) | |||||
Other | (2,188) | (2,188) | (2,188) | |||||
Other (in shares) | (50) | |||||||
Balance at end of period at Dec. 31, 2016 | 740,048 | $ 392 | 839,005 | 1,013,443 | (1,112,792) | 740,048 | ||
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2016 | 39,221 | |||||||
Equity activity | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 14,529 | $ 3 | 14,526 | 14,529 | ||||
Issuance of common stock (in shares) | 313 | |||||||
Issuance of restricted stock | (20) | $ 1 | (21) | (20) | ||||
Issuance of restricted stock (in shares) | 85 | |||||||
Net income | 87,340 | 87,340 | 87,340 | |||||
Vesting of restricted stock | 5,247 | 5,247 | 5,247 | |||||
Vested stock options | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||
Stock option exercises | 202 | 202 | 202 | |||||
Stock option exercises (in shares) | 8 | |||||||
Non-controlling interests contribution | $ 3,488 | 3,488 | ||||||
Common stock cash distributions | (90,219) | (90,219) | (90,219) | |||||
Other | (1,969) | (1,969) | (1,969) | |||||
Other (in shares) | (57) | |||||||
Balance at end of period at Dec. 31, 2017 | 755,160 | $ 396 | 856,992 | 1,100,783 | (1,203,011) | 3,488 | 758,648 | |
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2017 | 39,570 | |||||||
Equity activity | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 929 | 929 | 929 | |||||
Issuance of common stock (in shares) | 22 | |||||||
Issuance of restricted stock | (8) | $ 1 | (9) | (8) | ||||
Issuance of restricted stock (in shares) | 91 | |||||||
Net income | 154,981 | 154,981 | 95 | 155,076 | ||||
Vesting of restricted stock | 5,870 | 5,870 | 5,870 | |||||
Stock option exercises | 123 | 123 | 123 | |||||
Stock option exercises (in shares) | 5 | |||||||
Non-controlling interests contribution | 3,963 | 3,963 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest distributions | (65) | (65) | ||||||
Common stock cash distributions | (90,372) | (90,372) | (90,372) | |||||
Other | (1,193) | (1,193) | (1,193) | |||||
Other (in shares) | (31) | |||||||
Balance at end of period at Dec. 31, 2018 | $ 825,490 | $ 397 | $ 862,712 | $ 1,255,764 | $ (1,293,383) | $ 7,481 | $ 832,971 | |
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2018 | 39,657 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQ_2
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (Parenthetical) - $ / shares | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||||||||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Sep. 30, 2018 | Jun. 30, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY | |||||||||||
Dividends paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 2.280 | $ 2.280 | $ 2.190 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($) | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||
Net income | $ 155,076,000 | $ 87,340,000 | $ 85,115,000 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 37,555,000 | 37,610,000 | 35,932,000 |
Stock-based compensation expense | 5,870,000 | 5,249,000 | 4,280,000 |
Impairment charges | 1,880,000 | 766,000 | |
Gain on sale of real estate, net | (70,682,000) | (3,814,000) | (3,582,000) |
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures | (2,864,000) | (2,263,000) | (1,138,000) |
Income distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures | 2,371,000 | 1,738,000 | 1,695,000 |
Insurance proceeds for damaged property | 2,619,000 | ||
Payment for remediation of damaged property | (508,000) | ||
Straight-line rental income | (9,550,000) | (10,694,000) | (13,477,000) |
Lease incentives funded | (1,272,000) | (6,544,000) | (4,827,000) |
Amortization of lease incentives | 2,092,000 | 2,209,000 | 1,955,000 |
Provision for doubtful accounts | 87,000 | (206,000) | 457,000 |
Non-cash interest related to contingent liabilities | 377,000 | 602,000 | 684,000 |
Non-cash income related to earn-out and related lease incentive write-off | (3,074,000) | (842,000) | (16,000) |
Other non-cash items, net | 1,180,000 | 1,282,000 | 1,216,000 |
Increase in interest receivable | (5,682,000) | (5,367,000) | (5,147,000) |
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable | (1,096,000) | 601,000 | 701,000 |
Net change in other assets and liabilities | 3,036,000 | (3,476,000) | 1,094,000 |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 115,535,000 | 105,305,000 | 105,708,000 |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||
Investment in real estate properties | (40,408,000) | (82,405,000) | (74,923,000) |
Investment in real estate developments | (35,279,000) | (22,901,000) | (42,342,000) |
Investment in real estate capital improvements | (3,249,000) | (2,899,000) | (6,792,000) |
Capitalized interest | (1,248,000) | (908,000) | (1,408,000) |
Proceeds from sale of real estate, net | 92,749,000 | 15,413,000 | 17,369,000 |
Investment in real estate mortgage loans receivable | (21,364,000) | (11,913,000) | (20,685,000) |
Principal payments received on mortgage loans receivable | 2,136,000 | 17,863,000 | 8,278,000 |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | (670,000) | (3,848,000) | (1,770,000) |
Payment of working capital reserve | (439,000) | (2,756,000) | |
Advances and originations under notes receivable | (124,000) | (14,969,000) | |
Principal payments received on notes receivable | 3,848,000 | 25,000 | 100,000 |
Net cash used in investing activities | (3,609,000) | (92,012,000) | (139,898,000) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||
Bank borrowings | 116,200,000 | 113,000,000 | 123,600,000 |
Repayment of bank borrowings | (100,700,000) | (123,600,000) | (137,000,000) |
Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured notes | 100,000,000 | 77,500,000 | |
Principal payments on senior unsecured notes | (38,166,000) | (31,167,000) | (26,667,000) |
Proceeds from common stock issued | 1,005,000 | 14,578,000 | 78,592,000 |
Stock option exercises | 123,000 | 202,000 | 159,000 |
Distributions paid to stockholders | (90,372,000) | (90,219,000) | (84,568,000) |
Contribution from non-controlling interests | 3,963,000 | 3,488,000 | |
Distributions paid to non-controlling interests | (65,000) | ||
Financing costs paid | (3,162,000) | (363,000) | (147,000) |
Other | (1,201,000) | (1,990,000) | (2,230,000) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (112,375,000) | (16,071,000) | 29,239,000 |
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | (449,000) | (2,778,000) | (4,951,000) |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period | 5,213,000 | 7,991,000 | 12,942,000 |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period | 4,764,000 | 5,213,000 | 7,991,000 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||
Interest paid | $ 30,116,000 | $ 28,070,000 | $ 24,490,000 |
The Company
The Company | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
The Company | |
The Company | 1. The Company LTC Properties, Inc. (“LTC”), a Maryland corporation, commenced operations on August 25, 1992. LTC is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that invests primarily in seniors housing and health care properties through sale-leaseback transactions, mortgage financing and structured finance solutions including mezzanine lending. We conduct and manage our business as one operating segment, rather than multiple operating segments, for internal reporting and internal decision making purposes. Our primary objectives are to create, sustain and enhance stockholder equity value and provide current income for distribution to stockholders through real estate investments in seniors housing and health care properties managed by experienced operators. Our primary seniors housing and health care property classifications include skilled nursing centers (“SNF”), assisted living communities (“ALF”), independent living communities (“ILF”), memory care communities (“MC”) and combinations thereof. ALF, ILF, MC and combinations thereof are included in the ALF classification. |
Summary of Significant Accounti
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LTC, our wholly‑owned subsidiaries, and our consolidated companies. All intercompany investments, accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Consolidation of entities is based on determination of the primary beneficiary. In order to be considered the primary beneficiary, the member should be able to exercise power over and receive benefits from the entity. Power over the company is based on the provisions of the operating agreement that provides us with a controlling financial interest in the entity. Under the terms of the operating agreement, we, as the general member, are responsible for the management of the company’s assets, business and affairs. Our rights and duties in management of the company include making all operating decisions, setting the capital budget, executing all contracts, making all employment decisions, and handling the purchase and disposition of assets, among others. We, as the general member, are responsible for the ongoing, major, and central operations of the company and make all management decisions. In addition, we, as the general member, assume the risk for all operating losses, capital losses, and are entitled to substantially all capital gains (appreciation) and accordingly, receive substantial benefits from the company. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) created a framework for evaluating whether a general partner or a group of general partners controls a limited partnership or a managing member or a group of managing members exercise power over a limited liability company and therefore should consolidate the entity. The guidance states that the presumption of general partner or managing member control would be overcome only when the limited partners or non-managing members have certain specific rights as described in the guidance. The limited members have virtually no rights and are precluded from taking part in the operation, management or control of the company. The limited members are also precluded from transferring their interests without the expressed permission of the general member. However, we could transfer our interest without consultation or permission of the limited members. We consolidated the companies in accordance with the guidance. The FASB requires the classification of non-controlling interests as a component of consolidated equity in the consolidated balance sheet subject to the provisions of the rules governing classification and measurement of redeemable securities. The guidance requires consolidated net income to be reported at the amounts attributable to both the controlling and non-controlling interests. The calculation of earnings per share will be based on income amounts attributable to the controlling interest. Any reference to the number of properties or facilities, number of units, number of beds, number of operators, and yield on investments in real estate are unaudited and outside the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation, including changes in presentation of Gain on sale of real estate, net on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income. The Company has included Gain on sale of real estate, net as a component of Operating Income to present gain and losses on sales of properties in accordance with ASC 360-10-45-5. The change was made for the prior periods as the Securities and Exchange Commission has eliminated Rule 3-15(a) of Regulation S-X as part of Release No. 33-10532; 34-83875; IC-33203, which had required REITs to present gain and losses on sale of properties outside of continuing operations in the income statement. These adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. Going Concern. In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements— Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) : Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments in this update define management’s responsibility under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to evaluate when and how substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern should be disclosed in the financial statement footnotes. This ASU expands disclosure requirements about principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt. It also requires disclosing management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relationship to the organization’s ability to meet its obligations, and management’s plans that are intended to either alleviate substantial doubt or to mitigate conditions or events that raise substantial doubt. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. We adopted this ASU in 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements or disclosures. Use of Estimates. Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased and are stated at cost which approximates market. Restricted Cash. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No 2016-18 (“ASU 2016-18”), Restricted Cash . ASU 2016-18 requires an entity to reconcile and explain the period over period change in total cash, cash equivalent and restricted cash within its consolidated statement of cash flows. During the third quarter of 2017, a 170-bed skilled nursing center in our portfolio was evacuated due to damages caused by Hurricane Harvey. This property is located in Texas and operated under a triple net master lease agreement. We periodically evaluate properties for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired or the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable through future undiscounted cash flows. Based upon a quarterly assessment of this property using the recoverability test, we concluded the property has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2018, the gross value and the carrying value of the property were $2,021,000 and $1,133,000, respectively. The provisions of our triple net lease agreements impose certain obligations on our operators including: · Acquire property insurance, subject to certain criteria; · Continue paying rent in the event of any property damage or destruction; and · Return the leased property back to us at the end of the lease term, in the same condition originally received. During the second quarter of 2018, our operator provided us with insurance proceeds of $2,619,000 to be used for remediation of the property as noted in the provisions of our master lease agreement. Accordingly, we have classified the insurance proceeds as restricted cash on our consolidated financial statements. Owned Properties. We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third-party opinions of value. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land and buildings and, for certain of our acquisitions, in‑place leases and other intangible assets. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, the estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the value of in‑place leases, we make best estimates based on the evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease‑up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. These assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in‑place leases. We evaluate each purchase transaction to determine whether the acquired assets meet the definition of an asset acquisition or a business combination. Transaction costs related to acquisitions that are not deemed to be businesses are included in the cost basis of the acquired assets, while transaction costs related to acquisitions that are deemed to be businesses are expensed as incurred. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01(“ASU 2017-01”), Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying Definition of a Business . ASU 2017-01 clarifies the framework for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business. The revised framework establishes a screen for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities is a business and narrows the definition of a business, which is expected to result in fewer transactions being accounted for as business combinations. Acquisitions of integrated sets of assets and activities that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. ASU 2017-01 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We early adopted this standard in 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, most of our acquisitions of investment properties will qualify as asset acquisitions. In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05 (“ASU 2017-05”), Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. ASU 2017-05 defines an in-substance nonfinancial asset and clarifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this standard in 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and related notes. We capitalize direct construction and development costs, including predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance and other costs directly related and essential to the acquisition, development or construction of a real estate asset. We capitalize construction and development costs while substantive activities are ongoing to prepare an asset for its intended use. We consider a construction project as substantially complete and held available for occupancy upon the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, or after development activities have ceased, are expensed as incurred. For redevelopment, renovation and expansion of existing operating properties, we capitalize the cost for the construction and improvement incurred in connection with the redevelopment, renovation and expansion. Costs previously capitalized related to abandoned acquisitions or developments are charged to earnings. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed principally by the straight‑line method for financial reporting purposes over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 5 years for computers, 5 to 15 years for furniture and equipment, 35 to 50 years for buildings, 10 to 15 years for site improvements, 10 to 20 years for building improvements and the respective lease term for acquired lease intangibles. Consolidation. At inception, and on an ongoing basis, as circumstances indicate the need for reconsideration, we evaluate each legal entity that is not wholly-owned by us for consolidation, first under the variable interest entity (“VIE”), then under the voting model. Our evaluation considers all of our variable interests, including common or preferred equity ownership, loans, and other participating instruments. The variable interest model applies to entities that meet both of the following criteria: · A legal structure been established to conduct business activities and to hold assets. · LTC has a variable interest in the entity - i.e. it has equity ownership or other financial interests that change with changes in the fair value of the entity's net assets. If an entity does meet the above criteria and doesn’t qualify for a scope exception from the VIE model, we will determine whether the entity is a VIE. A legal entity is determined to be a VIE if it has any of the following three characteristics: 1. The entity does not have sufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; 2. The equity holders, as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, as evidenced by all of the following characteristics: · The power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance; · The obligation to absorb the entity's expected losses; · The right to receive the entity's expected residual returns; or 3. The entity is established with non-substantive voting rights (i.e. the entity is structured such that majority economic interest holder(s) have disproportionately few voting rights). If any of the three characteristics of a VIE are met, we conclude that the entity is a VIE and evaluate it for consolidation under the variable interest model. If an entity is determined to be a VIE, we evaluate whether we are the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary analysis is a qualitative analysis based on power and benefits. We consolidate a VIE if we have both power and benefits - that is (i) we have the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance (power), and (ii) we have the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE, or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that potentially could be significant to the VIE (benefits). If we have a variable interest in a VIE but we are not the primary beneficiary, we account for our investment using the equity method of accounting. If a legal entity fails to meet any of the three of the characteristics of a VIE, we evaluate such entity under the voting interest model. Under the voting interest model, we consolidate the entity if we determine that we, directly or indirectly, have greater than 50% of the voting shares or if we are the general partner or managing member of the entity and the limited partners or non-managing members do not have substantive participating, liquidation, or kick-out rights that preclude our presumption of control. Mortgage Loans Receivable, Net of Loan Loss Reserve. Mortgage loans receivable we originate are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Mortgage loans we acquire are recorded at fair value at the time of purchase net of any related premium or discount which is amortized as a yield adjustment to interest income over the life of the loan. Additionally, we record an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts, as described below. Mezzanine Loans. In 2015 we strategically decided to allocate a portion of our capital deployment toward mezzanine loans to grow relationships with operating companies that have not typically utilized sale leaseback financing as a component of their capital structure. Mezzanine financing sits between senior debt and common equity in the capital structure, and typically is used to finance development projects or value-add opportunities on existing operational properties. We seek market-based, risk-adjusted rates of return typically between 12-18% with the loan term typically between four to eight years. Security for mezzanine loans can include all or a portion of the following credit enhancements; secured second mortgage, pledge of equity interests and personal/corporate guarantees. Mezzanine loans are recorded for GAAP purposes as either a loan, under notes receivable, or joint venture, under investment in unconsolidated joint ventures, depending upon specifics of the loan terms and related credit enhancements. Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures. From time to time, we provide funding to third-party operators for the acquisition, development and construction (“ADC”) of a property. Under an ADC arrangement, we may participate in the residual profits of the project through the sale or refinancing of the property. These ADC arrangements can have characteristics similar to a loan or similar to a joint venture or partnership such as participating in the risks and rewards of the project as an owner or an investment partner. If the ADC arrangement characteristics are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, we account for the ADC arrangement as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting or a direct investment (consolidated basis of accounting) instead of applying loan accounting. We evaluate our ADC arrangements first pursuant to ASC 805, Consolidation , to determine whether the ADC arrangement meets the definition of a VIE, as explained above, and whether we are the primary beneficiary. If the ADC arrangement is deemed to be a VIE but we are not the primary beneficiary, or if it is deemed to be a voting interest entity but we do not have a controlling financial interest, we account for our investment in the ADC arrangement using the equity method. Under the equity method, we initially record our investment at cost and subsequently recognize our share of net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income or loss, cash contributions made and distributions received, and other adjustments, as appropriate. Allocations of net income or loss may be subject to preferred returns or allocation formulas defined in operating agreements and may not be according to percentage ownership interests. In certain circumstances where we have a substantive profit-sharing arrangement which provides a priority return on our investment, a portion of our equity in earnings may consist of a change in our claim on the net assets of the underlying joint venture. Distributions of operating profit from the joint ventures are reported as part of operating cash flows, while distributions related to a capital transaction, such as a refinancing transaction or sale, are reported as investing activities. We periodically perform evaluation of our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures to determine whether the fair value of each investment is less than the carrying value, and, if such decrease in value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, write the investment down to its estimated fair value as of the measurement date. In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07 (“ASU 2016-07”), Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. ASU 2016-07 eliminates retroactive adjustment of an investment upon an investment qualifying for the equity method of accounting and requires the equity method investor to adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts depends on the expected collectability of our receivables which is based on considerations including the certainty of payment, payment history and other relevant factors. The allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses in our receivables. In determining the allowance, we perform a quarterly evaluation of all receivables. If this evaluation indicates that there is a greater risk of receivable charge‑offs, additional allowances are recorded in current period earnings or placement on non-accrual status may be required. Debt Issuance Cost. In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03 (“ASU 2015-03”), Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting) (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-15 allows debt issuance costs related to line of credit agreements to be presented in the balance sheet as an asset. Upon adoption of ASU 2015-15, we elected to present debt issuance costs related to our unsecured revolving line of credit as an asset on our consolidated balance sheets. Accrued incentives and earn-outs. As part of our acquisitions and/or amendments, we may commit to provide contingent payments to our sellers or lessees, upon the properties achieving certain rent coverage ratios. Typically, when the contingent payments are funded, cash rent will increase by the amount funded multiplied by a rate stipulated in the agreement. If it is deemed probable at acquisition, the contingent payment is recorded as a liability at the estimate fair value calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis and accreted to the settlement amount of the estimated payment date. If the contingent payment is an earn-out provided to the seller, the estimated fair value is capitalized to the property’s basis. If the contingent payment is provided to the lessee, the estimated fair value is recorded as a lease incentive included in the prepaid and other assets line item in our consolidated balance sheet and is amortized as a yield adjustment over the life of the lease. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of these contingent liabilities are evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in estimates of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. Impairments. Assets that are classified as held-for-use are periodically evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired or the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable through future undiscounted cash flows. Management assesses the impairment of properties and impairment losses are calculated as the excess of the carrying amount over the estimated fair value of assets as of the measurement date. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third-party opinions of value and other estimates of fair value such as estimated discounted future cash flows. Based on our assessment, during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we recognized impairment charges of $0, $1,880,000 and $766,000, respectively. Also, we evaluate the carrying values of mortgage loans receivable on an individual basis. Management periodically evaluates the realizability of future cash flows from the mortgage loan receivable when events or circumstances, such as the non‑receipt of principal and interest payments and/or significant deterioration of the financial condition of the borrower, indicate that the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized in current period earnings and is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable and the discounted cash flows expected to be received, or if foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral securing the mortgage. Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The FASB requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Accordingly, the aggregate fair market value amounts presented in the notes to these consolidated financial statements do not represent our underlying carrying value in financial instruments. The FASB provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The FASB emphasizes that fair value is a market‑based measurement, not an entity‑specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the FASB establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices). The fair value guidance issued by the FASB excludes accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement. However, this scope exception does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value, regardless of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases. In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities, entities are permitted to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. We have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities. The FASB requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. See Note 15. Fair Value Measurements for the disclosure about fair value of our financial instruments. Revenue Recognition. Rental income from operating leases is generally recognized on a straight‑line basis over the terms of the leases. Substantially all of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year and are generally computed in one of four methods depending on specific provisions of each lease as follows: (i) a specified annual increase over the prior year’s rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%; (ii) a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index; (iii) as a percentage of facility revenues in excess of base amounts or (iv) specific dollar increases. The FASB does not provide for the recognition of contingent revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated. We consider the operating history of the lessee and the general condition of the industry when evaluating whether all possible contingencies have been eliminated and have historically, and expect in the future, to not include contingent rents as income until received. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we received $470,000, $457,000 and $517,000, respectively, of contingent rental income. We follow a policy related to rental income whereby we consider a lease to be non‑performing after 60 days of non‑payment of past due amounts and do not recognize unpaid rental income from that lease until the amounts have been received. Rental revenues relating to non‑contingent leases that contain specified rental increases over the life of the lease are recognized on the straight‑line basis. Recognizing income on a straight‑line basis requires us to calculate the total non‑contingent rent containing specified rental increases over the life of the lease and to recognize the revenue evenly over that life. This method results in rental income in the early years of a lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight‑line rent receivable asset included in our consolidated balance sheet. At some point during the lease, depending on its terms, the cash rent payments eventually exceed the straight‑line rent which results in the straight‑line rent receivable asset decreasing to zero over the remainder of the lease term. We assess the collectability of straight‑line rent in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and our reserve policy. If the lessee becomes delinquent in rent owed under the terms of the lease, we may provide a reserve against the recognized straight‑line rent receivable asset for a portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recoverable. Interest income on mortgage loans is recognized using the effective interest method. We follow a policy related to mortgage interest whereby we consider a loan to be non‑performing after 60 days of non‑payment of amounts due and do not recognize unpaid interest income from that loan until the past due amounts have been received. Effective interest method, as required by GAAP, is a technique for calculating the actual interest rate for the term of a mortgage loan based on the initial origination value. Similar to the accounting methodology of straight-line rent, the actual interest rate is higher than the stated interest rate in the early years of the mortgage loan thus creating an effective interest receivable asset included in the interest receivable line item in our consolidated balance sheet and reduces down to zero when, at some point during the mortgage loan, the stated interest rate is higher than the actual interest rate. Payments made to or on behalf of our lessees represent incentives that are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment over the term of the lease on a straight-line basis. Net loan fee income and commitment fee income are amortized over the life of the related loan. In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 . ASU 2014-09 provides for a single comprehensive principles based standard for the recognition of revenue across all industries through the application of the following five-step process: Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer. Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract. Step 3: Determine the transaction price. Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 states that “ an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” In doing so, companies may need to use more judgment and make more estimates. While this ASU specifically references contracts with customers, it may apply to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate. Additionally, the FASB has issued targeted updates to clarify specific implementation issues of ASU 2014-09. These updates include ASU 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), ASU 2016-10, Identifying Perfo |
Major Operators
Major Operators | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Major Operators | |
Major Operators | 3. Major Operators We have four operators from each of which we derive approximately 10% or more of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans. The following table sets forth information regarding our major operators as of December 31, 2018: Number of Number of Percentage of SNF ALF Total Total Operator SNF ALF Beds Units Revenue (1) Assets Prestige Healthcare 24 — 3,010 93 18.0 % 16.7 % Senior Lifestyle Corporation — 23 — 1,457 11.8 % 10.5 % Brookdale Senior Living — 37 — 1,702 9.9 % 4.6 % Senior Care Centers 11 — 1,444 — 8.8 % 7.1 % Total 35 60 4,454 3,252 48.5 % 38.9 % (1) Includes rental income from owned properties and interest income from mortgage loans as of December 31, 2018. Our financial position and ability to make distributions may be adversely affected if Prestige Healthcare, Senior Lifestyle Corporation, Brookdale Senior Living, Senior Care Centers or any of our lessees and borrowers face financial difficulties, including any bankruptcies, inability to emerge from bankruptcy, insolvency or general downturn in business of any such operator, or in the event any such operator does not renew and/or extend its relationship with us. On December 4, 2018, Senior Care Centers, LLC. and affiliates and subsidiaries (“Senior Care”) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a result of lease terminations from certain landlords and on-going operational challenges. Pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, Senior Care has an initial period of 120 days from the petition date to assume or reject the lease. As security under the lease, we hold a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $2,000,000, maintenance and repair escrows of approximately $2,200,000 and property tax escrows of approximately $1,800,000. Senior Care did not pay us December 2018 rent, but has paid us January and February 2019 rent. |
Supplemental Cash Flow Informat
Supplemental Cash Flow Information | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information | |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information | 4. Supplemental Cash Flow Information For the year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (in thousands) Non-cash investing and financing transactions: Contingent liabilities related to real estate investments ( Note 5) $ — $ — $ 1,847 Reclassification of pre-development loans ( Note 7) — — 237 Restricted stock issued, net of cancellations (Note 10) 1 1 1 |
Real Estate Investments
Real Estate Investments | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Real Estate Investments | |
Real Estate Investments | 5. Real Estate Investments Owned Properties. As of December 31, 2018, we owned 175 health care real estate properties located in 28 states and consisting of 103 ALFs, 71 SNFs and 1 behavioral health care hospital. These properties are operated by 28 operators. Assisted living communities, independent living communities, memory care communities and combinations thereof are included in the assisted living property classification (collectively “ALF”). Any reference to the number of properties, number of units, number of beds, and yield on investments in real estate are unaudited and outside the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm’s review of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Depreciation expense on buildings and improvements, including properties classified as held‑for‑sale, was $37,416,000, $37,492,000, and $35,809,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Future minimum base rents receivable under the remaining non‑cancelable terms of operating leases excluding the effects of straight‑line rent, amortization of lease inducement and renewal options are as follows ( in thousands ): Annual Cash Rent (1) 2019 $ 133,666 2020 140,353 2021 131,284 2022 121,235 2023 124,897 Thereafter 760,163 (1) Represents contractual annual cash rent, except for two master leases which are based on agreed upon cash rents. See below for more information. During 2017, we issued a notice of default to Anthem Memory Care (“Anthem”) resulting from Anthem’s partial payment of minimum rent. Anthem operates 11 operational memory care communities under a master lease. We are currently not pursuing enforcement of the guarantees and our rights and remedies pertaining to known events of default under the master lease, with the stipulation that Anthem achieve sufficient performance and pay an agreed upon cash rent for these 11 properties. During 2018, Anthem paid the agreed upon minimum cash rent of $5,200,000. We receive regular financial performance updates from Anthem and continue to monitor Anthem’s performance obligations under the master lease agreement. On December 4, 2018, Senior Care Centers, LLC. and affiliates and subsidiaries (“Senior Care”) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a result of lease terminations from certain landlords and on-going operational challenges. Pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, Senior Care has an initial period of 120 days from the petition date to assume or reject the lease. As security under the lease, we hold a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $2,000,000, maintenance and repair escrows of approximately $2,200,000 and property tax escrows of approximately $1,800,000. Senior Care did not pay us December 2018 rent, but has paid us January and February 2019 rent. Acquisitions. The following table summarizes our acquisitions for the years ended December 31, 2018 through 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands): Total Number Number Purchase Transaction Acquisition of of Year Type of Property Price Costs (1) Costs Properties Beds/Units 2018 (2) Assisted Living (3) (4) $ 39,600 $ 65 $ 39,665 3 177 Land (4) 695 48 743 — — Total $ 40,295 $ 113 $ 40,408 3 177 2017 Assisted Living (5) $ 81,018 $ 569 $ 81,587 5 400 Land (6) 800 18 818 — — Total $ 81,818 $ 587 $ 82,405 5 400 2016 Skilled Nursing (7) $ 16,000 $ 45 $ 16,045 1 126 Assisted Living (8) 53,550 423 53,973 4 250 Land (9) 6,891 108 6,999 — — Total $ 76,441 $ 576 $ 77,017 5 376 (1) Represents cost associated with our acquisitions; however, upon adoption of ASU 2017-01, our acquisitions meet the definition of an asset acquisition resulting in capitalization of transaction costs to the properties’ basis. For our land purchases with forward development commitments, transaction costs are capitalized as part of construction in progress. Transaction costs per our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income represents current and prior year transaction costs due to timing and terminated transactions. (2) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we entered into a joint venture (“ JV”) to purchase an existing operational 74-unit ALF/MC community. The non-controlling partner contributed $919 of equity and we contributed $15,950 in cash. Our economic interest in the real estate JV will be approximately 95%. (3) We acquired two MC in Texas. (4) We entered into a JV to develop, purchase and own seniors housing properties. During 2018, the JV purchased land for the development of a 78-unit ALF/MC in Oregon for a total anticipated project cost of $18,108. The non-controlling partner contributed $1,081 of cash and we committed to fund the remaining $17,027 project cost. Additionally, during 2018, in a sale-leaseback transaction, the JV purchased an existing operational 89-unit ILF adjacent to the 78-unit ALF/MC we are developing for $14,400. The non-controlling partner contributed $2,857 of equity and we contributed $11,543 in cash. Upon completion of the development project, our combined economic interest in the JV will be approximately 88%. We account for the JV on a consolidated basis. See Note 10. Equity for further discussion related to our partnerships and non-controlling interests. (5) We acquired an ALF and a MC in California, a MC in Ohio and an ALF/MC in Missouri. Furthermore, we entered into a JV and acquired an ALF/MC community. See Note 10. Equity for further discussion related to our partnerships and non-controlling interest. (6) We entered into a JV for the acquisition of land and development of an ALF/MC/ILF community in Wisconsin. See Note 10. Equity for further discussion related to our partnerships and non-controlling interest. (7) We acquired a newly constructed SNF in Texas. (8) We acquired a newly constructed MC in Kentucky, a newly constructed ALF/MC in Georgia and two MCs in Kansas. (9) We acquired a parcel of land and improvement and entered into a development commitment for the development of a SNF. Also, we purchased a parcel of land in Illinois and entered into a development commitment to construct a MC. Developments and Improvements. The following table summarizes our investment in development and improvement projects for the years 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands) : 2018 2017 2016 Type of Property Developments Improvements Developments Improvements Developments Improvements Assisted Living Communities $ 27,505 $ 2,292 $ 17,667 $ 1,152 $ 41,859 $ 3,034 Skilled Nursing Centers 7,774 500 5,234 1,356 483 3,758 Other — 457 — 391 — — Total $ 35,279 $ 3,249 $ 22,901 $ 2,899 $ 42,342 $ 6,792 Completed Projects. The following table summarizes our completed projects during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands): Number Type Number of of of Total Year Type of Project Properties Property Beds/Units State Investment 2018 Development 1 MC 66 Illinois $ 14,998 Total 1 66 $ 14,998 2017 Development 1 MC 66 Illinois $ 13,498 Total 1 66 $ 13,498 2016 Development 1 MC 66 Illinois $ 12,248 Development 1 MC 56 Texas 11,776 Development 1 MC 66 Illinois 11,962 Development 1 MC 66 California 12,400 Development 1 ALF/MC 89 South Carolina 15,080 Development 1 ILF 108 Kansas 13,423 Improvement 1 SNF 160 Arizona 4,672 Total 7 611 $ 81,561 Properties held-for-sale . The following table summarizes our properties held-for-sale at December 31, 2018 (dollar amounts in thousands): Type Number Number of of Gross Accumulated of State Property Properties Investment Depreciation Beds/units Texas ILF 1 5,746 1,916 140 Totals 1 $ 5,746 $ 1,916 140 Property Sales . The following table summarizes property sales during the years ended December 31, 2018 through 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands): Type Number Number Net of of of Sales Carrying Gain Year State Properties Properties Beds Price Value (Loss) 2018 Alabama, Florida and Georgia SNF $ 27,975 $ 5,695 $ 21,987 Kansas ALF (1) — — 350 346 — Ohio and Pennsylvania ALF 67,500 16,352 48,695 Total 2018 10 774 $ 95,825 $ 22,393 $ 70,682 2017 Indiana, Iowa and Oregon ALF $ 15,650 $ 10,107 $ 4,985 Texas SNF (2) — 1,170 (1,171) Total 2017 $ 15,650 $ 11,277 $ 3,814 2016 Florida ALF $ 6,850 $ 4,869 $ 1,973 Texas SNF 235 6,750 4,923 1,802 New Jersey OTH — 3,850 3,997 (193) Total 2016 $ 17,450 $ 13,789 $ 3,582 (1) We sold land adjacent to an existing ALF community in Kansas. (2) We donated a SNF with a carrying value of $1,170 to a nonprofit health care provider. Mortgage Loans. At December 31, 2018, the mortgage loans had interest rates ranging from 9.2% to 9.7% and maturities ranging from 2020 to 2045. In addition, some loans contain certain guarantees, provide for certain facility fees and the majority of the mortgage loans have a 30‑year term. The majority of the mortgage loans provide for annual increases in the interest rate based upon a specified increase of 2.25%. Please see Item 1. Business. Portfolio for a table that summarizes our loaned properties as of December 31, 2018. The following table summarizes our mortgage loan activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands): 2018 2017 2016 Originations and funding under mortgage loans receivable $ 21,364 (1) $ 11,913 $ 20,685 Pay-offs received (1,086) (16,665) (6,036) Scheduled principal payments received (1,050) (1,198) (2,242) Mortgage loan (premiums) (4) (4) (10) (Provision for)/ recovery of loan loss reserve (192) 60 (125) Net increase (decrease) in mortgage loans receivable $ 19,032 $ (5,894) $ 12,272 (1) During 2018, we funded an additional $7,400 under an existing mortgage loan for the purchase of a 112-bed SNF in Michigan. The incremental funding bears interest at 8.7%, fixed for five years, and escalating by 2.25% thereafter. Also, we funded additional loan proceeds of $7,125 under an existing mortgage loan for the purchase of a 126-bed SNF in Michigan. This incremental funding bears interest at 9.41%, fixed for five years, and escalating by 2.25% thereafter. At December 31, 2018 and 2017 the carrying values of the mortgage loans were $242,939,000 and $223,907,000, respectively. Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loan receivables are as follows (in thousands) : Scheduled Principal 2019 $ 1,065 2020 8,815 2021 1,175 2022 1,175 2023 1,175 Thereafter 231,981 Total $ 245,386 The following table summarizes our early mortgage loan payoffs during the years 2018, 2017 and 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands) : Early Number Principal of Payoff Loans State 2018 $ 1,086 UT 2017 $ 10,795 AZ/MO/TX 2016 $ 6,036 MO/TX/WA |
Investment in Unconsolidated Jo
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | 6. Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures Our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures consists of a preferred equity investment and two mezzanine loans which are accounted for as unconsolidated joint ventures in accordance with GAAP. The following table summarizes our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures (dollar amounts in thousands): Type Type Total Currently Number of of Preferred Paid in of Investment Carrying State Properties Investment Return Cash Beds/ Units Commitment Value Arizona ALF/MC/ILF Preferred Equity (1) % % $ 25,650 $ 24,032 Florida ALF/IL/MC Mezzanine (2) % % 2,900 (3) 3,183 (3) Florida UDP-ALF/MC Mezzanine (2) % % 3,400 3,400 Total $ 31,950 $ 30,615 (1) We have concluded that the JV is a VIE in accordance with GAAP. However, because we do not control the entity, nor do we have any role in the day-to-day management, we are not the primary beneficiary of the JV. Therefore, we account for the JV investment using the equity method. (2) We evaluated these ADC arrangements and determined that the characteristics are similar to jointly-owned investments or partnerships, and accordingly, these investments are accounted for as unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting instead of loan accounting. (3) Since interest payments were deferred and no interest was recorded for the first twelve months of the loan, we used the effective interest method in accordance with GAAP to recognize interest income and recorded the difference between the effective interest income and cash interest income to the loan principal balance. The following table summarizes our capital contributions, income recognized, and cash interest received related to our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands): Type of Capital Income Cash Interest Year Properties Contribution Recognized Received 2018 ALF/MC/ILF $ 670 $ 2,041 $ 1,975 ALF/IL/MC — 511 396 UDP-ALF/MC — 312 (1) — (1) Total 2018 $ 670 $ 2,864 $ 2,371 2017 ALF/MC/ILF 1,101 1,560 1,436 ALF/IL/MC — 511 302 UDP-ALF/MC 2,747 192 (1) — (1) Total 2017 $ 3,848 $ 2,263 $ 1,738 2016 ALF/MC/ILF $ 1,770 $ 1,138 $ 1,695 ALF/IL/MC — — — UDP-ALF/MC — — — Total 2016 $ 1,770 $ 1,138 $ 1,695 (1) We withheld $653 at the time of loan origination which is being applied to interest. As of December 31, 2018, we still hold $177 which will be applied to future interest. |
Notes Receivable
Notes Receivable | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Notes Receivable. | |
Notes Receivable | 7. Notes Receivable Notes receivable consists of mezzanine loans and other loan arrangements. The following table is a summary of our notes receivable components at December 31, 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ): At December 31, 2018 2017 Mezzanine loans $ 9,868 $ 13,700 Other loans 2,975 2,868 Notes receivable reserve (128) (166) Total $ 12,715 $ 16,402 The following table summarizes our notes receivable activity for the years ended December 31, 2018 through 2016 ( in thousands ): Year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Advances under notes receivable $ 124 $ — $ 14,969 Principal payments received under notes receivable (3,848) (25) (100) Reclassified to real estate under development (1) — — (237) Notes receivable reserve 37 — (166) Net (decrease) increase in notes receivable $ (3,687) $ (25) $ 14,466 (1) Represents pre-development loans which matured due to land acquisitions and commencement of development projects. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we entered into a $6,828,000 mezzanine loan commitment for the development of a 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC in Georgia which will be funded during the first quarter of 2019. The mezzanine loan has a five-year term and bears interest at 12%, with 8% current-pay during the first 46 months of the loan, and the balance accruing to the note and 12% current-pay thereafter. |
Lease Incentives
Lease Incentives | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Lease Incentives | |
Lease Incentives | 8. Lease Incentives The following table summarizes lease incentives by component as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands): At December 31, 2018 2017 Non-contingent lease incentives $ 14,443 $ 14,904 Contingent lease incentives — 6,577 Total $ 14,443 $ 21,481 The following table summarizes our lease incentive activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands) : 2018 2017 2016 Funding Amortization Write-off Funding Amortization Write-off Funding Amortization Write-off Non-contingent lease incentives $ 1,272 $ (1,733) $ — $ 6,544 $ (1,590) $ (1,205) (2) $ 4,559 $ (1,207) $ — Contingent lease incentives — (359) (6,219) (1) — (619) (2,634) (3) 268 (748) (514) (4) Net increase (decrease) in lease incentives $ 1,272 $ (2,092) $ (6,219) $ 6,544 $ (2,209) $ (3,839) $ 4,827 $ (1,955) $ (514) (1) We entered into an amended master lease agreement with Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC (“Senior Lifestyle”). Among the provisions of the amendment, the contingent lease incentive payable to Senior Lifestyle was removed. Therefore, we wrote-off the Senior Lifestyle contingent lease incentive. (2) Represents the write-off of lease incentives related to two MC communities due to negotiations to transition these properties to another operator in our portfolio that never materialized. (3) Represents the write-off of lease incentive related to an ALF due to a change to the business model at the property that resulted in lower net operating income and the improbability of paying the earn-out. (4) Represents the write-off of lease incentive related to two MC due to transitioning these properties to another operator in our portfolio. Non-contingent lease incentives represent payments made to our lessees for various reasons including entering into a new lease or lease amendments and extensions. Contingent lease incentives represent potential contingent earn-out payments that may be made to our lessees in the future, as part of our lease agreements. From time to time, we may commit to provide contingent payments to our lessees, upon our properties achieving certain rent coverage ratios. Once the contingent payment becomes probable and estimable, the contingent payment is recorded as a lease incentive. Lease incentives are amortized as a yield adjustment to rental income over the remaining life of the lease. |
Debt Obligations
Debt Obligations | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Debt Obligations | |
Debt Obligations | 9. Debt Obligations Bank Borrowings. During 2018, we amended and restated our unsecured credit agreement to replace the previous unsecured credit agreement, prior to its expiration on October 14, 2018. The amended credit agreement maintains the $600,000,000 aggregate commitment of the lenders under the prior agreement and provides for the opportunity to increase the commitment size of the credit agreement up to a total of $1,000,000,000. The amended credit agreement extends the maturity of the credit agreement to June 27, 2022 and provides for a one-year extension option at our discretion, subject to customary conditions. Additionally, the amended credit agreement decreases the interest rate margins and converts from the payment of unused commitment fees to a facility fee. Based on our leverage at December 31, 2018, the facility provides for interest annually at LIBOR plus 115 basis points and a facility fee of 20 basis points. At December 31, 2018 and 2017 we were in compliance with all covenants. Financial covenants contained in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, which are measured quarterly, require us to maintain, among other things: (i) a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value not greater than 0.5 to 1.0; (ii) a ratio of secured debt to total asset value not greater than 0.35 to 1.0; (iii) a ratio of unsecured debt to the value of the unencumbered asset value not greater than 0.6 to 1.0; and (iv) a ratio of EBITDA, as calculated in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, to fixed charges not less than 1.50 to 1.0. Senior Unsecured Notes . During 2017, we amended our shelf agreement with affiliates and managed accounts of Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (“Prudential”) to increase our shelf commitment to $337,500,000. The following table sets forth information regarding debt obligations by component as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands): Applicable Available Available Interest Outstanding for Outstanding for Debt Obligations Rate (1) Balance Borrowing Balance Borrowing Bank borrowings (2) 3.69% $ 112,000 $ 488,000 $ 96,500 $ 503,500 Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issue costs (3) 4.50% 533,029 93,833 571,002 63,667 Total 4.36% $ 645,029 $ 581,833 $ 667,502 $ 567,167 (1) Represents weighted average of interest rate as of December 31, 2018. (2) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we borrowed $26,400, net, under our unsecured revolving line of credit, accordingly we have $138,400 outstanding balance and $461,600 available for borrowing. (3) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we paid $4,167 in regular scheduled principal payments, accordingly we have $528,862 outstanding and $98,000 available under our senior unsecured notes. Our borrowings and repayments for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are as follows (in thousands): 2018 2017 2016 Debt Obligations Borrowings Repayments Borrowings Repayments Borrowings Repayments Bank borrowings $ 116,200 $ (100,700) $ 113,000 $ (123,600) $ 123,600 $ (137,000) Senior unsecured notes — (38,166) 100,000 (1) (31,167) 77,500 (2) (26,667) Total $ 116,200 $ (138,866) $ 213,000 $ (154,767) $ 201,100 $ (163,667) (1) During 2017, we sold 15-year senior unsecured notes in the aggregate amount of $100,000 to a group of investors, which included Prudential, in a private placement transaction. The notes bear interest at an annual rate of 4.5%, have scheduled principal payments and mature on February 16, 2032. (2) During the year ended December 31, 2016, we sold 10-year senior unsecured term notes in the amount of $37,500 to Prudential. The notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 4.15%, have scheduled principal payments and will mature in 2028. Additionally, we sold 10-year senior unsecured notes in the amount of $40,000 to affiliated insurance company investment advisory clients of AIG Asset Management (U.S.) LLC. The notes bear interest at a coupon of 3.99%, have scheduled principal payments and will mature in 2031. Scheduled Principal Payments. The following table represents our long-term contractual obligations (scheduled principal payments and amounts due at maturity) as of December 31, 2018, and excludes the effects of interest and debt issue costs ( in thousands ): Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Bank borrowings $ (1) $ — $ — $ — $ $ — $ — Senior unsecured notes (2) 48,160 Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (1) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we borrowed $26,400, net under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Accordingly, we have $138,400 outstanding and $461,600 available under our unsecured revolving line of credit. (2) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we paid $4,167 in regular scheduled principal payments, accordingly we have $528,862 outstanding and $98,000 available under our senior unsecured notes. . |
Equity
Equity | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Equity | |
Equity | 10. Equity Common Stock. We have an equity distribution agreement to issue and sell, from time to time, up to $200,000,000 in aggregate offering price of our company common shares. Sales of common shares will be made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions, which may include block trades or transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we sold 22,244 shares of common stock for $1,005,000 in net proceeds under our equity distribution agreement. In conjunction with the sale of common stock, we paid $18,000 as compensation to our sales agents and we reclassified $76,000 of accumulated costs associated with this agreement to additional paid in capital. Accordingly, at December 31, 2018, we had $184,139,000 available under our equity distribution agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold 312,881 shares of common stock for $14,600,000 in net proceeds under our equity distribution agreement. In conjunction with the sale of common stock, we paid $260,000 as compensation to our sales agents and we reclassified $49,000 of accumulated costs associated with this agreement to additional paid in capital. During the years 2018, 2017 and 2016, we acquired 31,326 shares, 42,089 shares and 49,405 shares, respectively, of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we acquired 20,345 shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations. Non-controlling Interests. During 2018 and 2017, we entered into partnerships to develop and/or own real estate. Given that our limited members do not have the substantive kick-out rights, liquidation rights, or participation rights, we have concluded that the partnerships are VIEs. Since we exercise power over and receive benefits from the VIEs, we are considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, we consolidate the VIEs and record the non-controlling interests at cost. As of December 31, 2018, we have the following consolidated VIEs ( in thousands ): Gross Investment Property Consolidated Non-Controlling Year (1) Purpose Type State Assets Interests 2018 Owned real estate ILF OR $ 14,400 (2) $ 2,857 (2) 2018 Owned real estate and development UDP OR 4,606 (2) 1,081 (2) 2017 Owned real estate and development UDP WI 16,665 (3) 2,272 (3) 2017 Owned real estate ALF SC 11,195 1,271 Total $ 46,866 $ 7,481 (1) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we entered into a JV to purchase an existing operational 74-unit ALF/MC community. The non-controlling partner contributed $919 of equity and we contributed $15,950 in cash. Our economic interest in the real estate JV will be approximately 95%. We account for the JV on a consolidated basis. (2) We entered into a JV to develop, purchase and own seniors housing properties. During 2018, the JV purchased land for the development of a 78-unit ALF/MC for a total anticipated project cost of $18,108. The non-controlling partner contributed $1,081 of cash and we committed to fund the remaining $17,027 project cost. Additionally, during 2018, in a sale-leaseback transaction, the JV purchased an existing operational 89-unit ILF adjacent to the 78-unit ALF/MC we are developing for $14,400. The non-controlling partner contributed $2,857 of equity and we contributed $11,543 in cash. Upon completion of the development project, our combined economic interest in the JV will be approximately 88%. We account for the JV on a consolidated basis. (3) We entered into a JV to own the real estate and develop a 110-unit ILF/ALF/MC community in Wisconsin. The commitment totals approximately $22,471. Shelf Registration Statement. We have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC, and currently have the ability to file additional automatic shelf registration statements, to provide us with capacity to offer an indeterminate amount of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt, depositary shares, or units. We may from time to time publicly raise capital under our automatic shelf registration statement in amounts, at prices, and on terms to be announced when and if the securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of the offering. Distributions. We declared and paid the following cash dividends (in thousands) : Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Declared Paid Declared Paid Declared Paid Common Stock $ 90,372 (1) $ 90,372 (1) $ 90,219 (1) $ 90,219 (1) 84,568 (2) 84,568 (2) (1) Represents $0.19 per share per month for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017. (2) Represents $0.18 per share per month for January through September 2016 and $0.19 per share per month for October through December 2016. In January 2019, we declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.19 per share on our common stock for the months of January, February and March 2019 payable on January 31, February 28 and March 29, 2019, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23, February 20 and March 21, 2019, respectively. Stock Based Compensation Plans. During 2015, we adopted, and our stockholders approved the 2015 Equity Participation Plan (the “2015 Plan”) . Under the 2015 Plan, 1,400,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for awards, including nonqualified stock option grants and restricted stock grants to officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants. As of December 31, 2018, we have 825,457 shares of common stock reserved for awards under the 2015 Plan. The terms of the awards granted under the 2015 Plan are set by our compensation committee at its discretion. Restricted Stock and Performance-Based Stock Units. Restricted stock and performance-based stock units activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was as follows: 2018 2017 2016 Outstanding, January 1 244,181 210,573 187,347 Granted 156,718 143,057 127,087 Vested (75,149) (85,343) (103,861) Cancelled — (24,106) — Outstanding, December 31 325,750 244,181 210,573 Compensation expense related to restricted stock and performance based stock units for the year $ 5,870,000 $ 5,247,000 $ 4,265,000 During 2018, 2017 and 2016, we granted 156,718, 143,057 and 127,087 shares of restricted common stock and performance-based stock units, respectively, under the 2015 plan as follows: No. of Price per Year Shares/Units Share Vesting Period 2018 $ ratably over 3 years 66,171 $ 38.18 TSR targets (1) 8,728 $ 41.25 ratably over 1 year 2017 $ 45.76 ratably over 3 years 57,881 $ 45.76 TSR targets (1) 7,416 $ 48.55 ratably over 1 year 3,000 $ 50.50 ratably over 3 years 2016 $ ratably over 3 years 54,107 $ 46.87 TSR targets (2) 7,680 $ 46.87 ratably over 1 year (1) Vesting is based on achieving certain total shareholder return (“TSR”) targets in 4 years with acceleration opportunity in 3 years. (2) Vesting is based on achieving certain total TSR targets in 3.7 years with acceleration opportunity in 2.7 years. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we granted 139,112 shares of restricted common stock and performance-based stock units at $46.54 per share. Out of these shares, 78,276 vest ratably from the grant date over a three-year period and 60,836 vest based on achieving certain TSR targets in 4 years with acceleration opportunity in 3 years. At December 31, 2018, the total number of restricted common stock and performance-based stock units that are scheduled to vest and remaining compensation expense to be recognized related to the future service period of unvested outstanding restricted common stock and performance-based stock units are as follows: Number Remaining of Compensation Vesting Date Awards Expense 2019 128,214 (1) 4,250,000 2020 104,085 (2) 2,210,000 2021 93,451 (3) 238,000 Total 325,750 $ 6,698,000 (1) Includes 49,728 performance-based stock units. The performance-based stock units are valued utilizing a lattice-binomial option pricing model based on Monte Carlo simulations. The company recognizes the fair value of the awards over the applicable vesting period as compensation expense. (2) Includes 53,554 performance-based stock units. See (1) above for valuation methodology. (3) Includes 66,171 performance-based stock units. See (1) above for valuation methodology. Stock Options. During 2018, 2017 and 2016, we did not issue any stock options. Nonqualified stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, was as follows: Weighted Average Shares Price 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016 Outstanding, January 1 25,000 33,334 40,001 $ 32.92 $ 30.76 $ 29.60 Granted — — — n.a n.a n.a Exercised (5,000) (8,334) (6,667) $ 24.65 $ 24.31 $ 23.79 Canceled — — — n.a n.a n.a Outstanding, December 31 20,000 25,000 33,334 $ 34.99 $ 32.92 $ 30.76 Exercisable, December 31 (1) 20,000 25,000 28,334 $ 34.99 $ 32.92 $ 45.45 (1) The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at December 31, 2018, based upon the closing price of our common shares at December 31, 2018, the last trading day of 2018, was approximately $134,000. Options exercisable at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 3.3 years, 3.5 years, and 2.9 years, respectively. The options exercised during 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: Weighted Average Options Exercise Option Market Exercised Price Value Value (1) 2018 5,000 $ 24.65 $ 123,000 $ 205,000 2017 8,334 $ 24.31 $ 202,000 $ 410,797 2016 6,667 $ 23.79 $ 159,000 $ 311,000 (1) As of the exercise dates. We use the Black‑Scholes‑Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees. This model requires management to make certain estimates including stock volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected term. Compensation expense related to the vesting of stock options for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $0, $2,000 and $15,000, respectively. |
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Commitments and Contingencies | |
Commitments and Contingencies | 11. Commitments and Contingencies At December 31, 2018, we had commitments as follows (in thousands): Total Investment 2018 Commitment Remaining Commitment Funding Funded Commitment Real estate properties ( Note 5. Real Estate Investments ) $ 77,882 (1) $ 28,343 $ 45,787 $ 32,095 Accrued incentives and earn-out liabilities 9,000 (2) — — 9,000 Mortgage loans ( Note 5. Real Estate Investments ) 64,200 (3) 4,330 18,591 45,609 Joint venture investments ( Note 6. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures ) 25,650 670 23,684 1,966 Notes receivable ( Note 7. Notes Receivable ) 7,828 (4) 124 124 7,704 Total $ 184,560 $ 33,467 $ 88,186 $ 96,374 (1) Represents commitments to purchase land and improvements, if applicable, and to develop, re-develop, renovate or expand seniors housing and health care properties. Additionally, we have certain master leases that provide for additional capital expenditure allowance upon pre-approval of projects. (2) During the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, we recorded non-cash interest expense of $377 related to these contingent liabilities. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we entered into an amended master lease agreement with Senior Lifestyle. Among the provisions of the amendment, the contingent lease incentive payable to Senior Lifestyle was removed. Therefore, we wrote-off the Senior Lifestyle contingent lease incentive of $6,219 and the related earn-out liability of $9,292 which resulted in income of approximately $3,000. (3) $35,700 represents commitments to expand and renovate the seniors housing and health care properties securing the mortgage loans and $28,500 represents contingent funding upon the borrower achieving certain coverage ratios. (4) During the fourth quarter of 2018, we entered into a $6,800 mezzanine loan commitment for the development of a 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC in Georgia which will be funded during the first quarter of 2019. The mezzanine loan has a five-year term and bears interest at 12%, with 8% current-pay during the first 46 months of the loan, and the balance accruing to the note and 12% current-pay thereafter. Also, some of our lease agreements provide purchase options allowing the lessees to purchase the properties they currently lease from us. The following table summarizes information about purchase options included in our lease agreements: Type Number of of Gross Carrying Option State Property Properties Investments Value Window Kansas MC $ 25,692 $ 23,906 2019-2021 Texas MC 25,265 24,955 2025-2027 Total $ 50,957 $ 48,861 We are a party from time to time to various general and professional liability claims and lawsuits asserted against the lessees or borrowers of our properties, which in our opinion are not singularly or in the aggregate material to our results of operations or financial condition. These types of claims and lawsuits may include matters involving general or professional liability, which we believe under applicable legal principles are not our responsibility as a non-possessory landlord or mortgage holder. We believe that these matters are the responsibility of our lessees and borrowers pursuant to general legal principles and pursuant to insurance and indemnification provisions in the applicable leases or mortgages. We intend to continue to vigorously defend such claims. |
Distributions
Distributions | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Distributions | |
Distributions | 12. Distributions We must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income in order to continue to qualify as a REIT. This distribution requirement can be satisfied by current year distributions or, to a certain extent, by distributions in the following year. For federal tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are treated as ordinary income, capital gains, return of capital or a combination thereof. Distributions for 2018, 2017 and 2016 were cash distributions. The federal income tax classification of the per share common stock distributions are as follows ( unaudited ): Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Ordinary taxable distribution $ 0.349 $ 1.607 $ 1.485 Return of capital — 0.444 0.556 Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain 0.636 0.163 0.149 Long-term capital gain 1.295 0.066 — Total $ 2.280 $ 2.280 $ 2.190 |
Net Income Per Common Share
Net Income Per Common Share | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Net Income Per Common Share | |
Net Income Per Common Share | 13. Net Income Per Common Share Basic and diluted net income per share was as follows (in thousands except per share amounts) : For the year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Net income $ $ $ Less income allocated to non-controlling interests (95) — — Less income allocated to participating securities: Non-forfeitable dividends on participating securities (357) (350) (373) Income allocated to participating securities (268) (12) (12) Total net income allocated to participating securities (625) (362) (385) Net income available to common stockholders Effect of dilutive securities: Participating securities 362 385 Net income for diluted net income per share $ $ $ Shares for basic net income per share 39,477 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options 3 10 13 Performance-based stock units 203 67 27 Participating securities 156 151 169 Total effect of dilutive securities 362 228 209 Shares for diluted net income per share 39,839 Basic net income per share $ 3.91 $ 2.21 $ 2.21 Diluted net income per share $ 3.89 $ 2.20 $ 2.21 |
Quarterly Financial Information
Quarterly Financial Information | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Quarterly Financial Information | |
Quarterly Financial Information | 14. Quarterly Financial Information For the quarter ended March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, (unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts) 2018 Revenues $ 41,810 $ 41,472 $ 41,776 $ 43,587 Net income available to common stockholders $ 20,271 $ 68,658 $ 34,782 $ 30,645 Net income per common share available to common stockholders: Basic $ 0.51 $ 1.74 $ 0.88 $ 0.78 Diluted $ 0.51 $ 1.73 $ 0.88 $ 0.77 Dividends per share declared $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 Dividends per share paid $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 2017 Revenues $ 42,622 $ 42,468 $ 41,246 $ 41,729 Net income available to common stockholders $ 21,416 $ 25,273 $ 20,536 $ 19,753 Net income per common share available to common stockholders: Basic $ 0.54 $ 0.64 $ 0.52 $ 0.50 Diluted $ 0.54 $ 0.64 $ 0.52 $ 0.50 Dividends per share declared $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 Dividends per share paid $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 NOTE: Quarterly and year‑to‑date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share amounts for the year. |
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Fair Value Measurements | |
Fair Value Measurements | 15. Fair Value Measurements In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities, entities are permitted to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings. We did not adopt the elective fair market value option for our financial assets and financial liabilities. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short‑term maturity of these instruments. We do not invest our cash in auction rate securities. The carrying value and fair value of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 assuming election of fair value for our financial assets and financial liabilities were as follows ( in thousands ): At December 31, 2018 At December 31, 2017 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Value Value Value Value Mortgage loans receivable $ 242,939 $ 295,492 (1) $ 223,907 $ 278,224 (1) Bank borrowings 112,000 112,000 (2) 96,500 96,500 (2) Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issue costs 533,029 508,613 (3) 571,002 577,126 (3) Accrued incentives and earn-outs — — (4) 8,916 8,916 (4) (1) Our investment in mortgage loans receivable is classified as Level 3. The fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is determined using our assumption on market conditions adjusted for market and credit risk and current returns on our investments. The discount rate used to value our future cash inflows of the mortgage loans receivable at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 9.0% and 8.7%, respectively. (2) Our bank borrowings bear interest at a variable interest rate. The estimated fair value of our bank borrowings approximated their carrying values at December 31, 2018 and 2017 based upon prevailing market interest rates for similar debt arrangements. (3) Our obligation under our senior unsecured notes is classified as Level 3 and thus the fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is measured based upon management’s estimates of rates currently prevailing for comparable loans available to us, and instruments of comparable maturities. At December 31, 2018, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 5.15% for those maturing before year 2026 and 5.40% for those maturing at or beyond year 2026. At December 31, 2017, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 4.10% for those maturing before year 2026 and 4.30% for those maturing beyond year 2026. (4) Our contingent obligations under the accrued incentives and earn‑out liabilities are classified as Level 3. We estimated the fair value of the contingent earn‑out payments using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate that we use consists of a risk‑free U.S. Treasury rate plus a company specific credit spread which we believe is acceptable by willing market participants. At December 31, 2017 the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of the earn-out liability was 6.2%. Furthermore, during the fourth quarter of 2018, we entered into an amended master lease agreement with Senior Lifestyle. Among the provisions of the amendment, the contingent lease incentive payable to Senior Lifestyle was removed. Therefore, we wrote-off the Senior Lifestyle contingent earn-out liability of $9,292. . |
Subsequent Events
Subsequent Events | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Subsequent Events | |
Subsequent Events | 16. Subsequent Events The following events occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date. Real Estate. We entered into a JV to purchase an existing operational 74-unit ALF/MC community. The non-controlling partner contributed $919,000 of equity and we contributed $15,950,000 in cash. Our economic interest in the real estate JV will be approximately 95%. Debt: We borrowed $26,400,000, net under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Accordingly, we have $138,400,000 outstanding and $461,600,000 available for borrowing under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Additionally, we paid $4,167,000 in regular scheduled principal payments, accordingly we have $528,862,000 outstanding and $98,000,000 available under our senior unsecured notes. Equity: We declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.19 per share on our common stock for the months of January, February and March 2019, payable on January 31, February 28, and March 29, 2019, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23, February 20, and March 21, 2019, respectively. Also, we acquired 20,345 shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations and we granted 139,112 shares of restricted common stock and performance-based stock units at $46.54 per share. Out of these shares, 78,276 vest ratably from the grant date over a three-year period and 60,836 vest based on achieving certain TSR targets in 4 years with acceleration opportunity in 3 years. |
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALI
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS | |
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS | LTC PROPERTIES, INC. SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (in thousands) Additions (Recovered) Balance at charged to beginning of costs and Charged to Balance at end Account Description period expenses other accounts Deductions (1) of period Year ended December 31, 2016 Loan loss reserves $ 2,190 $ 125 $ — $ — $ 2,315 Other notes receivable allowance — 166 — — 166 Straight-line rent receivable allowance 833 166 — (39) 960 $ 3,023 $ 457 $ — $ (39) $ 3,441 Year ended December 31, 2017 Loan loss reserves $ 2,315 $ (60) $ — $ — $ 2,255 Other notes receivable allowance 166 — — — 166 Straight-line rent receivable allowance 960 (146) — — 814 $ 3,441 $ (206) $ — $ — $ 3,235 Year ended December 31, 2018 Loan loss reserves $ 2,255 $ 192 $ — $ — $ 2,447 Other notes receivable allowance 166 (38) — — 128 Straight-line rent receivable allowance 814 (68) — — 746 $ 3,235 $ 86 $ — $ — $ 3,321 (1) Deductions represent uncollectible accounts written off. |
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND AC
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | LTC PROPERTIES, INC. SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (in thousands) Costs capitalized Gross amount at which carried at Initial cost to company subsequent December 31, 2018 Building and to Building and Accum Construction/ Acquisition Encumbrances Land improvements acquisition Land improvements Total (1) deprec. renovation date date Skilled Nursing Properties: 134 Alamogordo, NM $ — $ 210 $ 2,593 $ 641 $ 210 $ 3,234 $ 3,444 $ 1,408 1985 2001 218 Albuquerque, NM — 1,696 3,891 530 1,696 4,421 6,117 1,841 2008 2005 219 Albuquerque, NM — 1,950 8,910 207 1,950 9,117 11,067 3,670 1982 2005 220 Albuquerque, NM — 2,463 7,647 9 2,463 7,656 10,119 3,062 1970 2005 042 Altoona, IA — 105 2,309 444 105 2,753 2,858 1,920 1973 1996 252 Amarillo, TX — 844 — 7,925 844 7,925 8,769 1,871 2013 2011 214 Aransas Pass, TX — 154 1,276 589 154 1,865 2,019 888 2008 2004 247 Arlington, TX — 1,016 13,649 — 1,016 13,649 14,665 3,801 2007 2011 221 Beaumont, TX — 370 1,141 106 370 1,247 1,617 541 1950 2005 213 Beeville, TX — 186 1,197 70 186 1,267 1,453 493 1974 2004 007 Bradenton, FL — 330 2,720 160 330 2,880 3,210 2,112 2012 1993 256 Brownwood, TX — 164 6,336 — 164 6,336 6,500 1,354 2011 2012 043 Carroll, IA — 47 1,033 213 47 1,246 1,293 867 1969 1996 177 Chesapeake, VA — 388 3,469 2,777 388 6,246 6,634 3,395 2017 1995 257 Cincinnati, OH — 1,890 25,110 — 1,890 25,110 27,000 3,694 2009 2012 125 Clovis, NM — 561 5,539 307 561 5,846 6,407 2,588 2006 2001 129 Clovis, NM — 598 5,902 59 598 5,961 6,559 2,662 1995 2001 268 Coldspring, KY — 2,050 21,496 — 2,050 21,496 23,546 4,091 2014 2012 253 Colton, CA — 2,342 15,158 — 2,342 15,158 17,500 3,082 1990 2011 211 Commerce City, CO — 236 3,217 167 236 3,384 3,620 1,529 1964 2004 212 Commerce City, CO — 161 2,160 95 161 2,255 2,416 999 1967 2004 246 Crowley, TX — 2,247 14,276 — 2,247 14,276 16,523 3,841 2007 2011 235 Daleville, VA — 279 8,382 — 279 8,382 8,661 2,421 2005 2010 258 Dayton, OH — 373 26,627 — 373 26,627 27,000 3,945 2010 2012 168 Des Moines, IA — 115 2,096 1,433 115 3,529 3,644 2,114 1972 1999 196 Dresden, TN — 31 1,529 1,073 31 2,602 2,633 1,095 2014 2000 298 Forth Worth, TX — 2,785 7,546 — 2,785 7,546 10,331 1,341 1998 2015 026 Gardendale, AL — 100 7,550 2,084 100 9,634 9,734 5,863 2011 1996 185 Gardner, KS — 896 4,478 4,150 896 8,628 9,524 3,773 2011 1999 248 Granbury, TX — 836 6,693 — 836 6,693 7,529 2,473 2008 2011 044 Granger, IA — 62 1,356 221 62 1,577 1,639 1,072 1979 1996 205 Grapevine, TX — 431 1,449 188 431 1,637 2,068 912 1974 2002 172 Griffin, GA — 500 2,900 — 500 2,900 3,400 1,711 1969 1999 250 Hewitt, TX — 1,780 8,220 99 1,780 8,319 10,099 1,815 2008 2011 194 Holyoke, CO — 211 1,513 283 211 1,796 2,007 1,085 1963 2000 051 Houston, TX — 365 3,769 1,598 365 5,367 5,732 3,508 1968 1996 054 Houston, TX — 202 4,458 1,426 202 5,884 6,086 3,996 2007 1996 055 Houston, TX — 202 4,458 1,359 202 5,817 6,019 3,880 2008 1996 045 Jefferson, IA — 86 1,883 296 86 2,179 2,265 1,464 1972 1996 008 Lecanto, FL — 351 2,665 2,737 351 5,402 5,753 3,735 2012 1993 300 Mansfield, TX — 2,890 13,110 — 2,890 13,110 16,000 1,424 2015 2016 053 Mesa, AZ — 305 6,909 1,876 305 8,785 9,090 5,632 1996 1996 226 Mesa, AZ — 1,095 2,330 4,673 1,095 7,003 8,098 1,407 2016 2006 242 Mission, TX — 1,111 16,602 — 1,111 16,602 17,713 4,014 2004 2010 115 Nacogdoches, TX — 100 1,738 168 100 1,906 2,006 1,164 1973 1997 233 Nacogdoches, TX — 394 7,456 268 394 7,724 8,118 2,077 1991 2010 249 Nacogdoches, TX — 1,015 11,109 — 1,015 11,109 12,124 3,451 2007 2011 245 Newberry, SC — 439 4,639 608 439 5,247 5,686 1,744 1995 2011 244 Newberry, SC — 919 5,454 131 919 5,585 6,504 1,634 2001 2011 046 Norwalk, IA — 47 1,033 239 47 1,272 1,319 895 1975 1996 176 Olathe, KS — 520 1,872 313 520 2,185 2,705 1,393 1968 1999 251 Pasadena, TX — 1,155 14,345 522 1,155 14,867 16,022 3,012 2005 2011 210 Phoenix, AZ — 334 3,383 456 334 3,839 4,173 1,844 1982 2004 193 Phoenix, AZ — 300 9,703 92 300 9,795 10,095 5,601 1985 2000 047 Polk City, IA — 63 1,376 153 63 1,529 1,592 1,046 1976 1996 094 Portland, OR — 100 1,925 3,152 100 5,077 5,177 3,166 2007 1997 254 Red Oak, TX — 1,427 17,173 — 1,427 17,173 18,600 3,479 2002 2012 124 Richland Hills, TX — 144 1,656 427 144 2,083 2,227 1,155 1976 2001 197 Ripley, TN — 20 985 1,638 20 2,623 2,643 1,101 2014 2000 LTC PROPERTIES, INC. SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued) (in thousands) Costs capitalized Gross amount at which carried at Initial cost to company subsequent December 31, 2018 Building and to Building and Accum Construction/ Acquisition Encumbrances Land improvements acquisition Land improvements Total (1) deprec. renovation date date 133 Roswell, NM $ — $ 568 $ 5,235 $ 1,396 $ 568 $ 6,631 $ 7,199 $ 2,782 1975 2001 081 Sacramento, CA — 220 2,929 1,481 220 4,410 4,630 2,330 2015 1997 085 Salina, KS — 100 1,153 628 100 1,781 1,881 1,201 1985 1997 281 Slinger, WI — 464 13,482 — 464 13,482 13,946 2,040 2014 2015 234 St. Petersburg, FL — 1,070 7,930 500 1,070 8,430 9,500 2,084 1988 2010 243 Stephenville, TX — 670 10,117 500 670 10,617 11,287 2,627 2009 2010 225 Tacoma, WA — 723 6,401 901 723 7,302 8,025 3,105 2009 2006 178 Tappahannock, VA — 375 1,327 397 375 1,724 2,099 1,487 1978 1995 270 Trinity, FL — 1,653 12,748 — 1,653 12,748 14,401 2,131 2008 2013 192 Tucson, AZ — 276 8,924 112 276 9,036 9,312 5,162 1992 2000 299 Weatherford, TX — 836 11,902 — 836 11,902 12,738 1,726 1996 2015 236 Wytheville, VA — 647 12,167 — 647 12,167 12,814 4,370 1996 2010 Skilled Nursing Properties $ — $ 49,593 $ 463,714 $ 51,877 $ 49,593 $ 515,591 $ 565,184 $ 172,196 Assisted Living Properties: 077 Ada, OK — 100 1,650 — 100 1,650 1,750 926 1996 1996 105 Arvada, CO — 100 2,810 6,960 100 9,770 9,870 2,955 2014 1997 304 Athens, GA — 1,056 13,326 — 1,056 13,326 14,382 948 2016 2016 063 Athens, TX — 96 1,510 104 96 1,614 1,710 929 1995 1996 269 Aurora, CO — 850 8,583 — 850 8,583 9,433 1,548 2014 2013 260 Aurora, CO — 831 10,071 — 831 10,071 10,902 1,819 1999 2012 203 Bakersfield, CA — 834 11,986 812 834 12,798 13,632 6,115 2002 2001 117 Beatrice, NE — 100 2,173 183 100 2,356 2,456 1,211 1997 1997 277 Burr Ridge, IL — 1,400 11,102 — 1,400 11,102 12,502 1,229 2016 2014 278 Castle Rock, CO — 759 9,041 — 759 9,041 9,800 823 2012 2014 160 Central, SC — 100 2,321 — 100 2,321 2,421 1,050 1998 1999 263 Chatham, NJ — 5,365 36,399 — 5,365 36,399 41,764 6,297 2002 2012 307 Clovis, CA — 2,542 19,126 — 2,542 19,126 21,668 824 2014 2017 308 Clovis, CA — 3,054 14,172 — 3,054 14,172 17,226 587 2016 2017 279 Corpus Christi, TX — 880 11,440 — 880 11,440 12,320 1,166 2016 2015 292 De Forest, WI — 485 5,568 8 485 5,576 6,061 594 2006 2015 057 Dodge City, KS — 84 1,666 4 84 1,670 1,754 994 1995 1995 083 Durant, OK — 100 1,769 — 100 1,769 1,869 977 1997 1997 107 Edmond, OK — 100 1,365 526 100 1,891 1,991 1,024 1996 1997 163 Ft. Collins, CO — 100 2,961 3,405 100 6,366 6,466 2,258 2014 1999 170 Ft. Collins, CO — 100 3,400 4,622 100 8,022 8,122 2,510 2014 1999 132 Ft. Meyers, FL — 100 2,728 9 100 2,737 2,837 1,440 1998 1998 229 Ft. Worth, TX — 333 4,385 1,028 333 5,413 5,746 1,916 2009 2008 315 Ft. Worth, TX — 1,534 11,099 — 1,534 11,099 12,633 158 2014 2018 100 Fremont ,OH — 100 2,435 106 100 2,541 2,641 1,363 1997 1997 267 Frisco, TX — 1,000 5,154 — 1,000 5,154 6,154 977 2014 2012 314 Frisco, TX — 2,216 10,417 — 2,216 10,417 12,633 152 2015 2018 296 Glenview, IL 2,800 14,248 — 2,800 14,248 17,048 568 2017 2015 167 Goldsboro, NC — 100 2,385 1 100 2,386 2,486 1,006 1998 1999 056 Great Bend, KS — 80 1,570 21 80 1,591 1,671 1,052 1995 1995 102 Greeley, CO — 100 2,310 270 100 2,580 2,680 1,395 1997 1997 284 Green Bay, WI — 1,660 19,079 356 1,660 19,435 21,095 2,015 2004 2015 164 Greenville, NC — 100 2,478 2 100 2,480 2,580 1,175 1998 1999 062 Greenville, TX — 42 1,565 84 42 1,649 1,691 947 1995 1996 161 Greenwood, SC — 100 2,638 — 100 2,638 2,738 1,278 1998 1999 241 Gulf Breeze, FL — 720 3,780 261 720 4,041 4,761 1,093 2000 2010 295 Jacksonville, FL — 1,389 12,756 39 1,389 12,795 14,184 1,098 2015 2015 066 Jacksonville, TX — 100 1,900 77 100 1,977 2,077 1,137 1996 1996 310 Kansas City, MO 1,072 15,552 — 1,072 15,552 16,624 448 2017 2017 285 Kenosha, WI — 936 12,361 165 936 12,526 13,462 1,155 2008 2015 255 Littleton, CO — 1,882 8,248 — 1,882 8,248 10,130 1,548 2013 2012 268 Littleton, CO — 1,200 8,688 — 1,200 8,688 9,888 1,690 2014 2013 148 Longmont, CO — 100 2,640 — 100 2,640 2,740 1,378 1998 1998 060 Longview, TX — 38 1,568 127 38 1,695 1,733 978 1995 1995 261 Louisville, CO — 911 11,703 — 911 11,703 12,614 2,069 2000 2012 LTC PROPERTIES, INC. SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued) (in thousands) Costs capitalized Gross amount at which carried at Initial cost to company subsequent December 31, 2018 Building and to Building and Accum Construction/ Acquisition Encumbrances Land improvements acquisition Land improvements Total (1) deprec. renovation date date 301 Louisville, KY $ — $ 1,021 $ 13,157 $ — $ 1,021 $ 13,157 $ 14,178 937 2016 2016 114 Loveland, CO — 100 2,865 270 100 3,135 3,235 1,681 1997 1997 068 Lufkin, TX — 100 1,950 94 100 2,044 2,144 1,167 1996 1996 061 Marshall, TX — 38 1,568 534 38 2,102 2,140 1,235 1995 1995 293 McHenry, IL — 1,289 28,976 123 1,289 29,099 30,388 2,978 2005 2015 058 McPherson, KS — 79 1,571 4 79 1,575 1,654 1,041 1994 1995 316 Medford, OR — 750 13,650 — 750 13,650 14,400 144 1984 2018 239 Merritt Island, FL — 550 8,150 100 550 8,250 8,800 2,107 2004 2010 104 Millville, NJ — 100 2,825 708 100 3,533 3,633 1,631 1997 1997 286 Milwaukee, WI — 818 8,014 56 818 8,070 8,888 861 2007 2015 231 Monroeville, PA — 526 5,334 435 526 5,769 6,295 1,714 1997 2009 280 Murrells Inlet, SC — 2,490 14,185 — 2,490 14,185 16,675 1,207 2016 2015 294 Murrieta, CA — 2,022 11,136 — 2,022 11,136 13,158 993 2016 2015 289 Neenah, WI — 694 20,839 212 694 21,051 21,745 2,028 1991 2015 166 New Bern, NC — 100 2,427 1 100 2,428 2,528 1,044 1998 1999 118 Newark, OH — 100 2,435 275 100 2,710 2,810 1,351 1997 1997 143 Niceville, FL — 100 2,680 — 100 2,680 2,780 1,399 1998 1998 095 Norfolk, NE — 100 2,123 165 100 2,288 2,388 1,191 1997 1997 306 Oak Lawn, IL — 1,591 13,772 — 1,591 13,772 15,363 281 2018 2016 290 Oshkosh, WI — 1,525 9,192 108 1,525 9,300 10,825 1,930 2009 2015 291 Oshkosh, WI — 475 7,364 40 475 7,404 7,879 776 2005 2015 302 Overland Park, KS — 1,951 11,882 259 1,951 12,141 14,092 958 2013 2016 232 Pittsburgh, PA — 470 2,615 333 470 2,948 3,418 972 1994 2009 165 Rocky Mount, NC — 100 2,494 1 100 2,495 2,595 1,103 1998 1999 059 Salina, KS — 79 1,571 4 79 1,575 1,654 1,041 1994 1995 084 San Antonio, TX — 100 1,900 — 100 1,900 2,000 1,048 1997 1997 092 San Antonio, TX — 100 2,055 — 100 2,055 2,155 1,128 1997 1997 288 Sheboygan, WI — 1,168 5,382 180 1,168 5,562 6,730 660 2006 2015 149 Shelby, NC — 100 2,805 2 100 2,807 2,907 1,464 1998 1998 312 Spartanburg, SC — 254 9,906 1,035 254 10,941 11,195 407 1999 2017 150 Spring Hill, FL — 100 2,650 — 100 2,650 2,750 1,383 1998 1998 103 Springfield, OH — 100 2,035 270 100 2,305 2,405 1,244 1997 1997 162 Sumter, SC — 100 2,351 — 100 2,351 2,451 1,091 1998 1999 140 Tallahassee, FL — 100 3,075 — 100 3,075 3,175 1,608 1998 1998 098 Tiffin, OH — 100 2,435 94 100 2,529 2,629 1,346 1997 1997 282 Tinley Park, IL — 702 11,481 — 702 11,481 12,183 1,076 2016 2015 088 Troy, OH — 100 2,435 593 100 3,028 3,128 1,548 1997 1997 080 Tulsa, OK — 200 1,650 — 200 1,650 1,850 919 1997 1997 093 Tulsa, OK — 100 2,395 — 100 2,395 2,495 1,311 1997 1997 238 Tupelo, MS — 1,170 8,230 30 1,170 8,260 9,430 2,203 2000 2010 075 Tyler, TX — 100 1,800 — 100 1,800 1,900 1,008 1996 1996 202 Vacaville, CA — 1,662 11,634 1,141 1,662 12,775 14,437 6,098 2002 2001 091 Waco, TX — 100 2,235 — 100 2,235 2,335 1,225 1997 1997 096 Wahoo, NE — 100 2,318 119 100 2,437 2,537 1,293 1997 1997 108 Watauga, TX — 100 1,668 — 100 1,668 1,768 908 1996 1997 287 Waukesha, WI — 992 15,183 187 992 15,370 16,362 1,435 2009 2015 109 Weatherford, OK — 100 1,669 592 100 2,261 2,361 1,222 1996 1997 309 West Chester, OH — 2,355 13,553 — 2,355 13,553 15,908 587 2017 2017 276 Westminster, CO — 1,425 9,575 — 1,425 9,575 11,000 1,480 2015 2013 110 Wheelersburg, OH — 29 2,435 239 29 2,674 2,703 1,344 1997 1997 303 Wichita, KS — 1,422 9,957 221 1,422 10,178 11,600 828 2011 2016 259 Wichita, KS — 730 — 9,682 730 9,682 10,412 2,057 2013 2012 283 Wichita, KS — 624 13,846 — 624 13,846 14,470 837 2016 2015 076 Wichita Falls, TX — 100 1,850 — 100 1,850 1,950 1,036 1996 1996 120 Wichita Falls, TX — 100 2,750 131 100 2,881 2,981 1,526 1997 1997 265 Williamstown, NJ — 711 6,637 — 711 6,637 7,348 1,287 2000 2012 264 Williamstown, NJ — 711 8,649 — 711 8,649 9,360 1,516 2000 2012 099 York, NE — 100 2,318 78 100 2,396 2,496 1,289 1997 1997 Assisted Living Properties $ — $ 70,772 $ 695,763 $ 37,486 $ 70,772 $ 733,249 $ 804,021 142,002 LTC PROPERTIES, INC. SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued) (in thousands) Costs capitalized Gross amount at which carried at Initial cost to company subsequent December 31, 2018 Building and to Building and Accum Construction/ Acquisition Encumbrances Land improvements acquisition Land improvements Total (1) deprec. renovation date date Other: Properties: 297 Las Vegas, NV — 1,965 7,308 849 1,965 8,157 10,122 677 1990/1994 2015 Properties — 1,965 7,308 849 1,965 8,157 10,122 677 Land : 271 Howell, MI — 420 — — 420 — 420 — N/A 2013 272 Milford, MI — 450 — — 450 — 450 — N/A 2014 275 Yale, MI — 73 — — 73 — 73 — N/A 2013 Land — 943 — — 943 — 943 — Other Properties — 2,908 7,308 849 2,908 8,157 11,065 677 Properties Under Development: 305 Union, KY — 19,057 — 19,057 19,915 — N/A 2016 311 Cedarburg, WI — 924 15,741 — 924 15,741 16,665 — N/A 2017 313 Medford, OR — 636 3,970 — 636 3,970 4,606 — N/A 2018 Properties Under Development — 2,418 38,768 — 2,418 38,768 41,186 — $ — $ 125,691 $ 1,205,553 $ 90,212 $ 125,691 $ 1,295,765 $ 1,421,456 (2) $ 314,875 (1) Depreciation is computed principally by the straight‑line method for financial reporting purposes which generally range of a life from (2) As of December 31, 2018, our aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes was $1,435,334. LTC PROPERTIES, INC. SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued) (in thousands) Activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Reconciliation of real estate: Carrying cost: Balance at beginning of period $ 1,392,122 $ 1,301,563 $ 1,198,686 Acquisitions 40,408 82,405 74,923 Improvements 38,528 25,800 49,134 Capitalized interest 1,248 908 1,408 Other non-cash items (See Note 4) — — 2,460 Cost of real estate sold (50,850) (18,554) (24,282) Impairment on real estate for sale — — (766) Ending balance $ 1,421,456 $ 1,392,122 $ 1,301,563 Accumulated depreciation: Balance at beginning of period $ 306,033 $ 275,861 $ 251,265 Depreciation expense 37,416 37,492 35,809 Cost of real estate sold (28,574) (7,320) (11,213) Ending balance $ 314,875 $ 306,033 $ 275,861 |
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON R
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE | |
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE | LTC PROPERTIES, INC. SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS RECEIVABLE ON REAL ESTATE (in thousands) Principal Amount of Carrying Loans Current Amount of Subject to (Unaudited) Monthly Face Mortgages Delinquent Number of Final Balloon Debt Amount of December 31, Principal or State Properties Units/Beds (3) Interest Rate (1) Maturity Date Amount (2) Service Mortgages 2018 Interest MI 15 2,029 9.71% 2043 $ 160,855 $ 1,500 $ 187,855 $ 184,160 $ — MI 4 501 9.22% 2045 29,487 257 33,317 32,984 — MI 1 157 9.41% 2045 14,325 117 15,000 14,825 — MI 2 205 9.41% 2020 11,081 89 11,081 10,970 — 22 (4) 2,892 $ 215,748 $ 1,963 $ 247,253 $ 242,939 $ — (1) Represents current stated interest rate. Generally, the loans have a 30‑year amortization with principal and interest payable at varying amounts over the life to maturity with annual interest adjustments through specified fixed rate increases effective either on the first anniversary or calendar year of the loan. (2) Balloon payment is due upon maturity. (3) This number is based upon unit/bed counts shown on operating licenses provided to us by borrowers or units/beds as stipulated by mortgage documents. We have found during the years that these numbers often differ, usually not materially, from units/beds in operation at any point in time. The differences are caused by such things as operators converting a patient/resident room for alternative uses, such as offices or storage, or converting a multi‑patient room/unit into a single patient room/unit. We monitor our properties on a routine basis through site visits and reviews of current licenses. In an instance where such change would cause a de‑licensing of beds or in our opinion impact the value of the property, we would take action against the borrower to preserve the value of the property/collateral. (4) Includes 4 first‑lien mortgage loans as follows: Number of Loans Original loan amounts 0 $ 500 - $2,000 0 $2,001 - $3,000 0 $3,001 - $4,000 0 $4,001 - $5,000 0 $5,001 - $6,000 0 $6,001 - $7,000 4 $7,001 + Mortgage loans receivable activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows: Balance— December 31, 2015 $ 217,529 New mortgage loans 13,250 Other additions 7,435 Land conveyance — Amortization of mortgage premium (10) Collections of principal (8,278) Foreclosures — Loan loss reserve (125) Other deductions — Balance— December 31, 2016 229,801 New mortgage loans — Other additions 11,913 Land conveyance (4) Amortization of mortgage premium (17,863) Collections of principal — Foreclosures 60 Loan loss reserve — Other deductions — Balance— December 31, 2017 223,907 New mortgage loans 14,525 Other additions 6,839 Land conveyance — Amortization of mortgage premium (4) Collections of principal (2,136) Foreclosures — Loan loss reserve (192) Other deductions — Balance— December 31, 2018 $ 242,939 |
Summary of Significant Accoun_2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
Basis of Presentation | Basis of Presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LTC, our wholly‑owned subsidiaries, and our consolidated companies. All intercompany investments, accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Consolidation of entities is based on determination of the primary beneficiary. In order to be considered the primary beneficiary, the member should be able to exercise power over and receive benefits from the entity. Power over the company is based on the provisions of the operating agreement that provides us with a controlling financial interest in the entity. Under the terms of the operating agreement, we, as the general member, are responsible for the management of the company’s assets, business and affairs. Our rights and duties in management of the company include making all operating decisions, setting the capital budget, executing all contracts, making all employment decisions, and handling the purchase and disposition of assets, among others. We, as the general member, are responsible for the ongoing, major, and central operations of the company and make all management decisions. In addition, we, as the general member, assume the risk for all operating losses, capital losses, and are entitled to substantially all capital gains (appreciation) and accordingly, receive substantial benefits from the company. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) created a framework for evaluating whether a general partner or a group of general partners controls a limited partnership or a managing member or a group of managing members exercise power over a limited liability company and therefore should consolidate the entity. The guidance states that the presumption of general partner or managing member control would be overcome only when the limited partners or non-managing members have certain specific rights as described in the guidance. The limited members have virtually no rights and are precluded from taking part in the operation, management or control of the company. The limited members are also precluded from transferring their interests without the expressed permission of the general member. However, we could transfer our interest without consultation or permission of the limited members. We consolidated the companies in accordance with the guidance. The FASB requires the classification of non-controlling interests as a component of consolidated equity in the consolidated balance sheet subject to the provisions of the rules governing classification and measurement of redeemable securities. The guidance requires consolidated net income to be reported at the amounts attributable to both the controlling and non-controlling interests. The calculation of earnings per share will be based on income amounts attributable to the controlling interest. Any reference to the number of properties or facilities, number of units, number of beds, number of operators, and yield on investments in real estate are unaudited and outside the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation, including changes in presentation of Gain on sale of real estate, net on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income. The Company has included Gain on sale of real estate, net as a component of Operating Income to present gain and losses on sales of properties in accordance with ASC 360-10-45-5. The change was made for the prior periods as the Securities and Exchange Commission has eliminated Rule 3-15(a) of Regulation S-X as part of Release No. 33-10532; 34-83875; IC-33203, which had required REITs to present gain and losses on sale of properties outside of continuing operations in the income statement. These adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates. Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Cash Equivalents | Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased and are stated at cost which approximates market. |
Restricted Cash | Restricted Cash. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No 2016-18 (“ASU 2016-18”), Restricted Cash . ASU 2016-18 requires an entity to reconcile and explain the period over period change in total cash, cash equivalent and restricted cash within its consolidated statement of cash flows. During the third quarter of 2017, a 170-bed skilled nursing center in our portfolio was evacuated due to damages caused by Hurricane Harvey. This property is located in Texas and operated under a triple net master lease agreement. We periodically evaluate properties for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired or the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable through future undiscounted cash flows. Based upon a quarterly assessment of this property using the recoverability test, we concluded the property has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2018, the gross value and the carrying value of the property were $2,021,000 and $1,133,000, respectively. The provisions of our triple net lease agreements impose certain obligations on our operators including: · Acquire property insurance, subject to certain criteria; · Continue paying rent in the event of any property damage or destruction; and · Return the leased property back to us at the end of the lease term, in the same condition originally received. During the second quarter of 2018, our operator provided us with insurance proceeds of $2,619,000 to be used for remediation of the property as noted in the provisions of our master lease agreement. Accordingly, we have classified the insurance proceeds as restricted cash on our consolidated financial statements. |
Owned Properties | Owned Properties. We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third-party opinions of value. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land and buildings and, for certain of our acquisitions, in‑place leases and other intangible assets. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, the estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the value of in‑place leases, we make best estimates based on the evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease‑up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. These assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in‑place leases. We evaluate each purchase transaction to determine whether the acquired assets meet the definition of an asset acquisition or a business combination. Transaction costs related to acquisitions that are not deemed to be businesses are included in the cost basis of the acquired assets, while transaction costs related to acquisitions that are deemed to be businesses are expensed as incurred. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01(“ASU 2017-01”), Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying Definition of a Business . ASU 2017-01 clarifies the framework for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business. The revised framework establishes a screen for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities is a business and narrows the definition of a business, which is expected to result in fewer transactions being accounted for as business combinations. Acquisitions of integrated sets of assets and activities that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. ASU 2017-01 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We early adopted this standard in 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, most of our acquisitions of investment properties will qualify as asset acquisitions. In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05 (“ASU 2017-05”), Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. ASU 2017-05 defines an in-substance nonfinancial asset and clarifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this standard in 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and related notes. We capitalize direct construction and development costs, including predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance and other costs directly related and essential to the acquisition, development or construction of a real estate asset. We capitalize construction and development costs while substantive activities are ongoing to prepare an asset for its intended use. We consider a construction project as substantially complete and held available for occupancy upon the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, or after development activities have ceased, are expensed as incurred. For redevelopment, renovation and expansion of existing operating properties, we capitalize the cost for the construction and improvement incurred in connection with the redevelopment, renovation and expansion. Costs previously capitalized related to abandoned acquisitions or developments are charged to earnings. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed principally by the straight‑line method for financial reporting purposes over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 5 years for computers, 5 to 15 years for furniture and equipment, 35 to 50 years for buildings, 10 to 15 years for site improvements, 10 to 20 years for building improvements and the respective lease term for acquired lease intangibles. |
Consolidation | Consolidation. At inception, and on an ongoing basis, as circumstances indicate the need for reconsideration, we evaluate each legal entity that is not wholly-owned by us for consolidation, first under the variable interest entity (“VIE”), then under the voting model. Our evaluation considers all of our variable interests, including common or preferred equity ownership, loans, and other participating instruments. The variable interest model applies to entities that meet both of the following criteria: · A legal structure been established to conduct business activities and to hold assets. · LTC has a variable interest in the entity - i.e. it has equity ownership or other financial interests that change with changes in the fair value of the entity's net assets. If an entity does meet the above criteria and doesn’t qualify for a scope exception from the VIE model, we will determine whether the entity is a VIE. A legal entity is determined to be a VIE if it has any of the following three characteristics: 1. The entity does not have sufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; 2. The equity holders, as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, as evidenced by all of the following characteristics: · The power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance; · The obligation to absorb the entity's expected losses; · The right to receive the entity's expected residual returns; or 3. The entity is established with non-substantive voting rights (i.e. the entity is structured such that majority economic interest holder(s) have disproportionately few voting rights). If any of the three characteristics of a VIE are met, we conclude that the entity is a VIE and evaluate it for consolidation under the variable interest model. If an entity is determined to be a VIE, we evaluate whether we are the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary analysis is a qualitative analysis based on power and benefits. We consolidate a VIE if we have both power and benefits - that is (i) we have the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance (power), and (ii) we have the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE, or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that potentially could be significant to the VIE (benefits). If we have a variable interest in a VIE but we are not the primary beneficiary, we account for our investment using the equity method of accounting. If a legal entity fails to meet any of the three of the characteristics of a VIE, we evaluate such entity under the voting interest model. Under the voting interest model, we consolidate the entity if we determine that we, directly or indirectly, have greater than 50% of the voting shares or if we are the general partner or managing member of the entity and the limited partners or non-managing members do not have substantive participating, liquidation, or kick-out rights that preclude our presumption of control. |
Mortgage Loans Receivable, Net of Loan Loss Reserve | Mortgage Loans Receivable, Net of Loan Loss Reserve. Mortgage loans receivable we originate are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Mortgage loans we acquire are recorded at fair value at the time of purchase net of any related premium or discount which is amortized as a yield adjustment to interest income over the life of the loan. Additionally, we record an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts, as described below. |
Mezzanine Loans | Mezzanine Loans. In 2015 we strategically decided to allocate a portion of our capital deployment toward mezzanine loans to grow relationships with operating companies that have not typically utilized sale leaseback financing as a component of their capital structure. Mezzanine financing sits between senior debt and common equity in the capital structure, and typically is used to finance development projects or value-add opportunities on existing operational properties. We seek market-based, risk-adjusted rates of return typically between 12-18% with the loan term typically between four to eight years. Security for mezzanine loans can include all or a portion of the following credit enhancements; secured second mortgage, pledge of equity interests and personal/corporate guarantees. Mezzanine loans are recorded for GAAP purposes as either a loan, under notes receivable, or joint venture, under investment in unconsolidated joint ventures, depending upon specifics of the loan terms and related credit enhancements. |
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures | Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures. From time to time, we provide funding to third-party operators for the acquisition, development and construction (“ADC”) of a property. Under an ADC arrangement, we may participate in the residual profits of the project through the sale or refinancing of the property. These ADC arrangements can have characteristics similar to a loan or similar to a joint venture or partnership such as participating in the risks and rewards of the project as an owner or an investment partner. If the ADC arrangement characteristics are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, we account for the ADC arrangement as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting or a direct investment (consolidated basis of accounting) instead of applying loan accounting. We evaluate our ADC arrangements first pursuant to ASC 805, Consolidation , to determine whether the ADC arrangement meets the definition of a VIE, as explained above, and whether we are the primary beneficiary. If the ADC arrangement is deemed to be a VIE but we are not the primary beneficiary, or if it is deemed to be a voting interest entity but we do not have a controlling financial interest, we account for our investment in the ADC arrangement using the equity method. Under the equity method, we initially record our investment at cost and subsequently recognize our share of net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income or loss, cash contributions made and distributions received, and other adjustments, as appropriate. Allocations of net income or loss may be subject to preferred returns or allocation formulas defined in operating agreements and may not be according to percentage ownership interests. In certain circumstances where we have a substantive profit-sharing arrangement which provides a priority return on our investment, a portion of our equity in earnings may consist of a change in our claim on the net assets of the underlying joint venture. Distributions of operating profit from the joint ventures are reported as part of operating cash flows, while distributions related to a capital transaction, such as a refinancing transaction or sale, are reported as investing activities. We periodically perform evaluation of our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures to determine whether the fair value of each investment is less than the carrying value, and, if such decrease in value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, write the investment down to its estimated fair value as of the measurement date. |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts depends on the expected collectability of our receivables which is based on considerations including the certainty of payment, payment history and other relevant factors. The allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses in our receivables. In determining the allowance, we perform a quarterly evaluation of all receivables. If this evaluation indicates that there is a greater risk of receivable charge‑offs, additional allowances are recorded in current period earnings or placement on non-accrual status may be required. |
Accrued incentives and earn-outs | Accrued incentives and earn-outs. As part of our acquisitions and/or amendments, we may commit to provide contingent payments to our sellers or lessees, upon the properties achieving certain rent coverage ratios. Typically, when the contingent payments are funded, cash rent will increase by the amount funded multiplied by a rate stipulated in the agreement. If it is deemed probable at acquisition, the contingent payment is recorded as a liability at the estimate fair value calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis and accreted to the settlement amount of the estimated payment date. If the contingent payment is an earn-out provided to the seller, the estimated fair value is capitalized to the property’s basis. If the contingent payment is provided to the lessee, the estimated fair value is recorded as a lease incentive included in the prepaid and other assets line item in our consolidated balance sheet and is amortized as a yield adjustment over the life of the lease. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of these contingent liabilities are evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in estimates of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. |
Impairments | Impairments. Assets that are classified as held-for-use are periodically evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired or the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable through future undiscounted cash flows. Management assesses the impairment of properties and impairment losses are calculated as the excess of the carrying amount over the estimated fair value of assets as of the measurement date. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third-party opinions of value and other estimates of fair value such as estimated discounted future cash flows. Based on our assessment, during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we recognized impairment charges of $0, $1,880,000 and $766,000, respectively. Also, we evaluate the carrying values of mortgage loans receivable on an individual basis. Management periodically evaluates the realizability of future cash flows from the mortgage loan receivable when events or circumstances, such as the non‑receipt of principal and interest payments and/or significant deterioration of the financial condition of the borrower, indicate that the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized in current period earnings and is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable and the discounted cash flows expected to be received, or if foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral securing the mortgage. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The FASB requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Accordingly, the aggregate fair market value amounts presented in the notes to these consolidated financial statements do not represent our underlying carrying value in financial instruments. The FASB provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The FASB emphasizes that fair value is a market‑based measurement, not an entity‑specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the FASB establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices). The fair value guidance issued by the FASB excludes accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement. However, this scope exception does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value, regardless of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases. In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities, entities are permitted to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. We have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities. The FASB requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. See Note 15. Fair Value Measurements for the disclosure about fair value of our financial instruments. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition. Rental income from operating leases is generally recognized on a straight‑line basis over the terms of the leases. Substantially all of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year and are generally computed in one of four methods depending on specific provisions of each lease as follows: (i) a specified annual increase over the prior year’s rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%; (ii) a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index; (iii) as a percentage of facility revenues in excess of base amounts or (iv) specific dollar increases. The FASB does not provide for the recognition of contingent revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated. We consider the operating history of the lessee and the general condition of the industry when evaluating whether all possible contingencies have been eliminated and have historically, and expect in the future, to not include contingent rents as income until received. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we received $470,000, $457,000 and $517,000, respectively, of contingent rental income. We follow a policy related to rental income whereby we consider a lease to be non‑performing after 60 days of non‑payment of past due amounts and do not recognize unpaid rental income from that lease until the amounts have been received. Rental revenues relating to non‑contingent leases that contain specified rental increases over the life of the lease are recognized on the straight‑line basis. Recognizing income on a straight‑line basis requires us to calculate the total non‑contingent rent containing specified rental increases over the life of the lease and to recognize the revenue evenly over that life. This method results in rental income in the early years of a lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight‑line rent receivable asset included in our consolidated balance sheet. At some point during the lease, depending on its terms, the cash rent payments eventually exceed the straight‑line rent which results in the straight‑line rent receivable asset decreasing to zero over the remainder of the lease term. We assess the collectability of straight‑line rent in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and our reserve policy. If the lessee becomes delinquent in rent owed under the terms of the lease, we may provide a reserve against the recognized straight‑line rent receivable asset for a portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recoverable. Interest income on mortgage loans is recognized using the effective interest method. We follow a policy related to mortgage interest whereby we consider a loan to be non‑performing after 60 days of non‑payment of amounts due and do not recognize unpaid interest income from that loan until the past due amounts have been received. Effective interest method, as required by GAAP, is a technique for calculating the actual interest rate for the term of a mortgage loan based on the initial origination value. Similar to the accounting methodology of straight-line rent, the actual interest rate is higher than the stated interest rate in the early years of the mortgage loan thus creating an effective interest receivable asset included in the interest receivable line item in our consolidated balance sheet and reduces down to zero when, at some point during the mortgage loan, the stated interest rate is higher than the actual interest rate. Payments made to or on behalf of our lessees represent incentives that are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment over the term of the lease on a straight-line basis. Net loan fee income and commitment fee income are amortized over the life of the related loan. |
Federal Income Taxes | Federal Income Taxes . LTC qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and as such, no provision for Federal income taxes has been made. A REIT is required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders and a REIT may deduct dividends in computing taxable income. If a REIT distributes 100% of its taxable income and complies with other Internal Revenue Code requirements, it will generally not be subject to Federal income taxation. For Federal tax purposes, depreciation is generally calculated using the straight‑line method over a period of 27.5 years. Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to stockholders, use the straight‑line method over 40 years. Both Federal taxable income and earnings and profits differ from net income for financial statement purposes principally due to the treatment of certain interest income, rental income, other expense items, impairment charges and the depreciable lives and basis of assets. At December 31, 2018, the tax basis of our net depreciable assets exceeds our book basis by approximately $25,639,000 (unaudited), primarily due to an investment recorded as an acquisition for tax and a mortgage loan for GAAP, and to differences previously mentioned above. The FASB clarified the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. The guidance utilizes a two‑step approach for evaluating tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when a company concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) is only addressed if step one has been satisfied (i.e., the position is more likely than not to be sustained). Under step two, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit (determined on a cumulative probability basis) that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. We currently do not have any uncertain tax positions that would not be sustained on its technical merits on a more‑likely than not basis. We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by certain tax jurisdictions. In the event we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in our consolidated financial statements as general and administrative expenses. |
Concentrations of Credit Risks | Concentrations of Credit Risk. In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 (“ASU 2016-13”) , Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326). This standard requires a new forward looking “expected loss” model to be used for receivables, held-to-maturity debt, loans, and other instruments. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on our consolidated financial statements. Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, mortgage loans receivable, marketable debt securities and operating leases on owned properties. Our financial instruments, mortgage loans receivable and operating leases, are subject to the possibility of loss of carrying value as a result of the failure of other parties to perform according to their contractual obligations or changes in market prices which may make the instrument less valuable. We obtain various collateral and other protective rights, and continually monitor these rights, in order to reduce such possibilities of loss. In addition, we provide reserves for potential losses based upon management’s periodic review of our portfolio. See Note 3. Major Operators for further discussion of concentrations of credit risk from our tenants. |
Properties held-for-sale | Properties held-for-sale. Properties classified as held‑for‑sale on the consolidated balance sheet include only those properties available for immediate sale in their present condition and for which management believes that it is probable that a sale of the property will be completed within one year. Properties held‑for‑sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. No depreciation expense is recognized on properties held‑for‑sale once they have been classified as such. Under ASU No. 2014-08 (“ASU 2014-08”), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. We have not reclassified results of operations for properties disposed as discontinued operations as these disposals do not represent strategic shifts in our operations. |
Net Income Per Share | Net Income Per Share. Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted‑average shares of common stock outstanding during the period excluding common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of all dilutive common stock equivalents. In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the determination of whether instruments granted in share‑based payments transactions are participating securities, we have applied the two‑class method of computing basic earnings per share. This guidance clarifies that outstanding unvested share‑based payment awards that contain rights to non‑forfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common stockholders and are considered participating securities. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock‑Based Compensation. The FASB requires all share‑based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. We use the Black‑Scholes‑Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees. Also, we use the Monte Carlo model to estimate the value of performance based stock units granted to employees. These models require management to make certain estimates including stock volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected term. If management incorrectly estimates these variables, the results of operations could be affected. The FASB also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow. Because we qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we are generally not subject to Federal income taxation. Therefore, this reporting requirement does not have an impact on our statements of cash flows. |
Segment Disclosures | Segment Disclosures. The FASB accounting guidance regarding disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information establishes standards for the manner in which public business enterprises report information about operating segments. Our investment decisions in seniors housing and health care properties, including mortgage loans, property lease transactions and other investments, are made and resulting investments are managed as a single operating segment for internal reporting and for internal decision‑making purposes. Therefore, we have concluded that we operate as a single segment. |
ASU 2014-15 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
New Accounting Pronouncement | Going Concern. In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements— Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) : Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments in this update define management’s responsibility under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to evaluate when and how substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern should be disclosed in the financial statement footnotes. This ASU expands disclosure requirements about principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt. It also requires disclosing management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relationship to the organization’s ability to meet its obligations, and management’s plans that are intended to either alleviate substantial doubt or to mitigate conditions or events that raise substantial doubt. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. We adopted this ASU in 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements or disclosures. |
ASU 2016-18 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
New Accounting Pronouncement | Restricted Cash. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No 2016-18 (“ASU 2016-18”), Restricted Cash . ASU 2016-18 requires an entity to reconcile and explain the period over period change in total cash, cash equivalent and restricted cash within its consolidated statement of cash flows. |
ASU 2017-01 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
New Accounting Pronouncement | In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01(“ASU 2017-01”), Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying Definition of a Business . ASU 2017-01 clarifies the framework for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business. The revised framework establishes a screen for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities is a business and narrows the definition of a business, which is expected to result in fewer transactions being accounted for as business combinations. Acquisitions of integrated sets of assets and activities that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. ASU 2017-01 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We early adopted this standard in 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, most of our acquisitions of investment properties will qualify as asset acquisitions. |
ASU 2017-05 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
New Accounting Pronouncement | In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05 (“ASU 2017-05”), Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. ASU 2017-05 defines an in-substance nonfinancial asset and clarifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this standard in 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and related notes. |
ASU 2016-07 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
New Accounting Pronouncement | In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07 (“ASU 2016-07”), Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. ASU 2016-07 eliminates retroactive adjustment of an investment upon an investment qualifying for the equity method of accounting and requires the equity method investor to adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. |
ASU 2015-03 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
New Accounting Pronouncement | Debt Issuance Cost. In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03 (“ASU 2015-03”), Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting) (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-15 allows debt issuance costs related to line of credit agreements to be presented in the balance sheet as an asset. Upon adoption of ASU 2015-15, we elected to present debt issuance costs related to our unsecured revolving line of credit as an asset on our consolidated balance sheets. |
ASU 2014-09 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
New Accounting Pronouncement | In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 . ASU 2014-09 provides for a single comprehensive principles based standard for the recognition of revenue across all industries through the application of the following five-step process: Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer. Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract. Step 3: Determine the transaction price. Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 states that “ an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” In doing so, companies may need to use more judgment and make more estimates. While this ASU specifically references contracts with customers, it may apply to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate. Additionally, the FASB has issued targeted updates to clarify specific implementation issues of ASU 2014-09. These updates include ASU 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), ASU 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, and ASU 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The new standard and its amendments are effective on January 1, 2018, and permit reporting entities to apply the standard using either a modified retrospective approach, by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption or full retrospective approach . We have adopted this standard using the modified retrospective adoption method on January 1, 2018. Accordingly, we concluded that this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition, as a substantial portion of our revenues consists of rental income from leasing arrangements and interest income from loan arrangements, both of which are specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09. |
ASU 2016-02 | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
New Accounting Pronouncement | Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842) . The objective of this ASU is to establish the principles that lessees and lessors shall apply to report useful information to users of financial statements about the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from a lease. ASC 842 represents a significant overhaul of the accounting treatment for leases governing substantially all leases, real estate leases included, with the most significant change being that most leases, including most operating leases, will now be capitalized on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 modifies existing guidance by requiring lessees to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance of operating leases. ASU 2016-02 requires the lessors to identify lease and non-lease components of a lease agreement. ASU 2016-02 will govern the recognition of revenue for lease components. Revenue related to non-lease components under lease agreements will be subject to the revenue recognition standard, upon adoption of this ASU. Additionally, in July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases - Targeted Improvements (“ASU 2018-11”), which provides lessors with the option to elect a practical expedient allowing them to not separate lease and non-lease components and instead, to account for those components as a single lease component. This practical expedient is limited to circumstances in which: (i) the timing and pattern of transfer are the same for the non-lease component and the related lease component and (ii) the lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease. This practical expedient causes an entity to assess whether a contract is predominantly lease-based or service-based and recognize the entire contract under the relevant accounting guidance (i.e., predominantly lease-based would be accounted for under ASU 2016-02 and predominantly service-based would be accounted for under the Revenue ASUs). This practical expedient option is available as a single election that must be consistently applied to all existing leases at the date of adoption. ASU 2018-11 also provides a practical expedient that allows companies to use an optional transition method. Under the optional transition method, a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings during the period of adoption is recorded and prior periods would not require restatement. Consequently, entities that elect both the practical expedient and the optional transitional method will apply the new lease ASU prospectively to leases commencing or modified after January 1, 2019 and will not be required to apply the disclosures under the new lease ASU to comparative periods. ASC 842 has subsequently been amended by other issued ASUs to clarify and improve the standard as well as to provide certain practical expedients. In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-20 (“ ASU 2018-20”), Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, which amends ASC 842 to require the lessors to exclude the lessor costs that are directly paid by the lessee to third parties on lessor’s behalf from variable payments. However, the lessor costs that are paid by the lessor and reimbursed by the lessee are required to be included in variable payments. Accordingly, we will begin reporting revenues and expenses within our leased properties, which are subject to non-cancelable triple-net leases, for certain real estate taxes that are reimbursed by our lessees in accordance with their respective leases with us. Furthermore, ASC 842 allows for several practical expedients which permit the following: no reassessment of lease classification or initial direct costs and use of the standard’s effective date as the date of initial application. ASU 2016-02 and its amendments, which now have formally entered into the FASB codification as ASC 842, are now effective on January 1, 2019. We expect to elect these practical expedients and adopt ASC 842 on January 1, 2019 using the effective date as our date of initial application. Therefore, financial information and disclosures under ASC 842 will not be provided for periods prior to January 1, 2019. |
Major Operators (Tables)
Major Operators (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Major Operators | |
Schedule of concentration of risk by major operators | Number of Number of Percentage of SNF ALF Total Total Operator SNF ALF Beds Units Revenue (1) Assets Prestige Healthcare 24 — 3,010 93 18.0 % 16.7 % Senior Lifestyle Corporation — 23 — 1,457 11.8 % 10.5 % Brookdale Senior Living — 37 — 1,702 9.9 % 4.6 % Senior Care Centers 11 — 1,444 — 8.8 % 7.1 % Total 35 60 4,454 3,252 48.5 % 38.9 % (1) Includes rental income from owned properties and interest income from mortgage loans as of December 31, 2018. |
Supplemental Cash Flow Inform_2
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information | |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information | For the year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (in thousands) Non-cash investing and financing transactions: Contingent liabilities related to real estate investments ( Note 5) $ — $ — $ 1,847 Reclassification of pre-development loans ( Note 7) — — 237 Restricted stock issued, net of cancellations (Note 10) 1 1 1 |
Real Estate Investments (Tables
Real Estate Investments (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Real Estate Investments | |
Schedule of future minimum base rents receivable | Future minimum base rents receivable under the remaining non‑cancelable terms of operating leases excluding the effects of straight‑line rent, amortization of lease inducement and renewal options are as follows ( in thousands ): Annual Cash Rent (1) 2019 $ 133,666 2020 140,353 2021 131,284 2022 121,235 2023 124,897 Thereafter 760,163 (1) Represents contractual annual cash rent, except for two master leases which are based on agreed upon cash rents. See below for more information. |
Summary of investments acquired | Acquisitions. The following table summarizes our acquisitions for the years ended December 31, 2018 through 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands): Total Number Number Purchase Transaction Acquisition of of Year Type of Property Price Costs (1) Costs Properties Beds/Units 2018 (2) Assisted Living (3) (4) $ 39,600 $ 65 $ 39,665 3 177 Land (4) 695 48 743 — — Total $ 40,295 $ 113 $ 40,408 3 177 2017 Assisted Living (5) $ 81,018 $ 569 $ 81,587 5 400 Land (6) 800 18 818 — — Total $ 81,818 $ 587 $ 82,405 5 400 2016 Skilled Nursing (7) $ 16,000 $ 45 $ 16,045 1 126 Assisted Living (8) 53,550 423 53,973 4 250 Land (9) 6,891 108 6,999 — — Total $ 76,441 $ 576 $ 77,017 5 376 (1) Represents cost associated with our acquisitions; however, upon adoption of ASU 2017-01, our acquisitions meet the definition of an asset acquisition resulting in capitalization of transaction costs to the properties’ basis. For our land purchases with forward development commitments, transaction costs are capitalized as part of construction in progress. Transaction costs per our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income represents current and prior year transaction costs due to timing and terminated transactions. (2) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we entered into a joint venture (“ JV”) to purchase an existing operational 74-unit ALF/MC community. The non-controlling partner contributed $919 of equity and we contributed $15,950 in cash. Our economic interest in the real estate JV will be approximately 95%. (3) We acquired two MC in Texas. (4) We entered into a JV to develop, purchase and own seniors housing properties. During 2018, the JV purchased land for the development of a 78-unit ALF/MC in Oregon for a total anticipated project cost of $18,108. The non-controlling partner contributed $1,081 of cash and we committed to fund the remaining $17,027 project cost. Additionally, during 2018, in a sale-leaseback transaction, the JV purchased an existing operational 89-unit ILF adjacent to the 78-unit ALF/MC we are developing for $14,400. The non-controlling partner contributed $2,857 of equity and we contributed $11,543 in cash. Upon completion of the development project, our combined economic interest in the JV will be approximately 88%. We account for the JV on a consolidated basis. See Note 10. Equity for further discussion related to our partnerships and non-controlling interests. (5) We acquired an ALF and a MC in California, a MC in Ohio and an ALF/MC in Missouri. Furthermore, we entered into a JV and acquired an ALF/MC community. See Note 10. Equity for further discussion related to our partnerships and non-controlling interest. (6) We entered into a JV for the acquisition of land and development of an ALF/MC/ILF community in Wisconsin. See Note 10. Equity for further discussion related to our partnerships and non-controlling interest. (7) We acquired a newly constructed SNF in Texas. (8) We acquired a newly constructed MC in Kentucky, a newly constructed ALF/MC in Georgia and two MCs in Kansas. (9) We acquired a parcel of land and improvement and entered into a development commitment for the development of a SNF. Also, we purchased a parcel of land in Illinois and entered into a development commitment to construct a MC. |
Schedule of investment in development and improvement projects | Developments and Improvements. The following table summarizes our investment in development and improvement projects for the years 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands) : 2018 2017 2016 Type of Property Developments Improvements Developments Improvements Developments Improvements Assisted Living Communities $ 27,505 $ 2,292 $ 17,667 $ 1,152 $ 41,859 $ 3,034 Skilled Nursing Centers 7,774 500 5,234 1,356 483 3,758 Other — 457 — 391 — — Total $ 35,279 $ 3,249 $ 22,901 $ 2,899 $ 42,342 $ 6,792 |
Schedule of completed projects | Completed Projects. The following table summarizes our completed projects during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands): Number Type Number of of of Total Year Type of Project Properties Property Beds/Units State Investment 2018 Development 1 MC 66 Illinois $ 14,998 Total 1 66 $ 14,998 2017 Development 1 MC 66 Illinois $ 13,498 Total 1 66 $ 13,498 2016 Development 1 MC 66 Illinois $ 12,248 Development 1 MC 56 Texas 11,776 Development 1 MC 66 Illinois 11,962 Development 1 MC 66 California 12,400 Development 1 ALF/MC 89 South Carolina 15,080 Development 1 ILF 108 Kansas 13,423 Improvement 1 SNF 160 Arizona 4,672 Total 7 611 $ 81,561 |
Summary of properties held-for-sale | Properties held-for-sale . The following table summarizes our properties held-for-sale at December 31, 2018 (dollar amounts in thousands): Type Number Number of of Gross Accumulated of State Property Properties Investment Depreciation Beds/units Texas ILF 1 5,746 1,916 140 Totals 1 $ 5,746 $ 1,916 140 |
Schedule of real estate investment property sold | Property Sales . The following table summarizes property sales during the years ended December 31, 2018 through 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands): Type Number Number Net of of of Sales Carrying Gain Year State Properties Properties Beds Price Value (Loss) 2018 Alabama, Florida and Georgia SNF $ 27,975 $ 5,695 $ 21,987 Kansas ALF (1) — — 350 346 — Ohio and Pennsylvania ALF 67,500 16,352 48,695 Total 2018 10 774 $ 95,825 $ 22,393 $ 70,682 2017 Indiana, Iowa and Oregon ALF $ 15,650 $ 10,107 $ 4,985 Texas SNF (2) — 1,170 (1,171) Total 2017 $ 15,650 $ 11,277 $ 3,814 2016 Florida ALF $ 6,850 $ 4,869 $ 1,973 Texas SNF 235 6,750 4,923 1,802 New Jersey OTH — 3,850 3,997 (193) Total 2016 $ 17,450 $ 13,789 $ 3,582 (1) We sold land adjacent to an existing ALF community in Kansas. We donated a SNF with a carrying value of $1,170 to a nonprofit health care provider. |
Schedule of mortgage loan activity | The following table summarizes our mortgage loan activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands): 2018 2017 2016 Originations and funding under mortgage loans receivable $ 21,364 (1) $ 11,913 $ 20,685 Pay-offs received (1,086) (16,665) (6,036) Scheduled principal payments received (1,050) (1,198) (2,242) Mortgage loan (premiums) (4) (4) (10) (Provision for)/ recovery of loan loss reserve (192) 60 (125) Net increase (decrease) in mortgage loans receivable $ 19,032 $ (5,894) $ 12,272 |
Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loan receivables | Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loan receivables are as follows (in thousands) : Scheduled Principal 2019 $ 1,065 2020 8,815 2021 1,175 2022 1,175 2023 1,175 Thereafter 231,981 Total $ 245,386 |
Schedule of early mortgage loan payoffs | The following table summarizes our early mortgage loan payoffs during the years 2018, 2017 and 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands) : Early Number Principal of Payoff Loans State 2018 $ 1,086 UT 2017 $ 10,795 AZ/MO/TX 2016 $ 6,036 MO/TX/WA |
Investment in Unconsolidated _2
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |
Summary of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | The following table summarizes our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures (dollar amounts in thousands): Type Type Total Currently Number of of Preferred Paid in of Investment Carrying State Properties Investment Return Cash Beds/ Units Commitment Value Arizona ALF/MC/ILF Preferred Equity (1) % % $ 25,650 $ 24,032 Florida ALF/IL/MC Mezzanine (2) % % 2,900 (3) 3,183 (3) Florida UDP-ALF/MC Mezzanine (2) % % 3,400 3,400 Total $ 31,950 $ 30,615 (1) We have concluded that the JV is a VIE in accordance with GAAP. However, because we do not control the entity, nor do we have any role in the day-to-day management, we are not the primary beneficiary of the JV. Therefore, we account for the JV investment using the equity method. (2) We evaluated these ADC arrangements and determined that the characteristics are similar to jointly-owned investments or partnerships, and accordingly, these investments are accounted for as unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting instead of loan accounting. (3) Since interest payments were deferred and no interest was recorded for the first twelve months of the loan, we used the effective interest method in accordance with GAAP to recognize interest income and recorded the difference between the effective interest income and cash interest income to the loan principal balance. |
Summary of capital contributions, income recognized and cash interest received from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | The following table summarizes our capital contributions, income recognized, and cash interest received related to our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands): Type of Capital Income Cash Interest Year Properties Contribution Recognized Received 2018 ALF/MC/ILF $ 670 $ 2,041 $ 1,975 ALF/IL/MC — 511 396 UDP-ALF/MC — 312 (1) — (1) Total 2018 $ 670 $ 2,864 $ 2,371 2017 ALF/MC/ILF 1,101 1,560 1,436 ALF/IL/MC — 511 302 UDP-ALF/MC 2,747 192 (1) — (1) Total 2017 $ 3,848 $ 2,263 $ 1,738 2016 ALF/MC/ILF $ 1,770 $ 1,138 $ 1,695 ALF/IL/MC — — — UDP-ALF/MC — — — Total 2016 $ 1,770 $ 1,138 $ 1,695 We withheld $653 at the time of loan origination which is being applied to interest. As of December 31, 2018, we still hold $177 which will be applied to future interest. |
Notes Receivable (Tables)
Notes Receivable (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Notes Receivable. | |
Summary of mezzanine loans and other loan arrangements | Notes receivable consists of mezzanine loans and other loan arrangements. The following table is a summary of our notes receivable components at December 31, 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ): At December 31, 2018 2017 Mezzanine loans $ 9,868 $ 13,700 Other loans 2,975 2,868 Notes receivable reserve (128) (166) Total $ 12,715 $ 16,402 |
Summary of notes receivable activity | The following table summarizes our notes receivable activity for the years ended December 31, 2018 through 2016 ( in thousands ): Year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Advances under notes receivable $ 124 $ — $ 14,969 Principal payments received under notes receivable (3,848) (25) (100) Reclassified to real estate under development (1) — — (237) Notes receivable reserve 37 — (166) Net (decrease) increase in notes receivable $ (3,687) $ (25) $ 14,466 (1) Represents pre-development loans which matured due to land acquisitions and commencement of development projects. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we entered into a $6,828,000 mezzanine loan commitment for the development of a 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC in Georgia which will be funded during the first quarter of 2019. The mezzanine loan has a five-year term and bears interest at 12%, with 8% current-pay during the first 46 months of the loan, and the balance accruing to the note and 12% current-pay thereafter. |
Lease Incentives (Tables)
Lease Incentives (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Lease Incentives | |
Summary of lease incentives by component | The following table summarizes lease incentives by component as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands): At December 31, 2018 2017 Non-contingent lease incentives $ 14,443 $ 14,904 Contingent lease incentives — 6,577 Total $ 14,443 $ 21,481 |
Summary of lease incentive activity | The following table summarizes our lease incentive activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands) : 2018 2017 2016 Funding Amortization Write-off Funding Amortization Write-off Funding Amortization Write-off Non-contingent lease incentives $ 1,272 $ (1,733) $ — $ 6,544 $ (1,590) $ (1,205) (2) $ 4,559 $ (1,207) $ — Contingent lease incentives — (359) (6,219) (1) — (619) (2,634) (3) 268 (748) (514) (4) Net increase (decrease) in lease incentives $ 1,272 $ (2,092) $ (6,219) $ 6,544 $ (2,209) $ (3,839) $ 4,827 $ (1,955) $ (514) (1) We entered into an amended master lease agreement with Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC (“Senior Lifestyle”). Among the provisions of the amendment, the contingent lease incentive payable to Senior Lifestyle was removed. Therefore, we wrote-off the Senior Lifestyle contingent lease incentive. (2) Represents the write-off of lease incentives related to two MC communities due to negotiations to transition these properties to another operator in our portfolio that never materialized. (3) Represents the write-off of lease incentive related to an ALF due to a change to the business model at the property that resulted in lower net operating income and the improbability of paying the earn-out. (4) Represents the write-off of lease incentive related to two MC due to transitioning these properties to another operator in our portfolio. |
Debt Obligations (Tables)
Debt Obligations (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Debt Obligations | |
Schedule of Debt Obligations | The following table sets forth information regarding debt obligations by component as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands): Applicable Available Available Interest Outstanding for Outstanding for Debt Obligations Rate (1) Balance Borrowing Balance Borrowing Bank borrowings (2) 3.69% $ 112,000 $ 488,000 $ 96,500 $ 503,500 Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issue costs (3) 4.50% 533,029 93,833 571,002 63,667 Total 4.36% $ 645,029 $ 581,833 $ 667,502 $ 567,167 (1) Represents weighted average of interest rate as of December 31, 2018. (2) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we borrowed $26,400, net, under our unsecured revolving line of credit, accordingly we have $138,400 outstanding balance and $461,600 available for borrowing. (3) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we paid $4,167 in regular scheduled principal payments, accordingly we have $528,862 outstanding and $98,000 available under our senior unsecured notes. |
Schedule of borrowings and repayments | Our borrowings and repayments for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are as follows (in thousands): 2018 2017 2016 Debt Obligations Borrowings Repayments Borrowings Repayments Borrowings Repayments Bank borrowings $ 116,200 $ (100,700) $ 113,000 $ (123,600) $ 123,600 $ (137,000) Senior unsecured notes — (38,166) 100,000 (1) (31,167) 77,500 (2) (26,667) Total $ 116,200 $ (138,866) $ 213,000 $ (154,767) $ 201,100 $ (163,667) (1) During 2017, we sold 15-year senior unsecured notes in the aggregate amount of $100,000 to a group of investors, which included Prudential, in a private placement transaction. The notes bear interest at an annual rate of 4.5%, have scheduled principal payments and mature on February 16, 2032. (2) During the year ended December 31, 2016, we sold 10-year senior unsecured term notes in the amount of $37,500 to Prudential. The notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 4.15%, have scheduled principal payments and will mature in 2028. Additionally, we sold 10-year senior unsecured notes in the amount of $40,000 to affiliated insurance company investment advisory clients of AIG Asset Management (U.S.) LLC. The notes bear interest at a coupon of 3.99%, have scheduled principal payments and will mature in 2031. |
Schedule of principal payments and amounts due at maturity | Scheduled Principal Payments. The following table represents our long-term contractual obligations (scheduled principal payments and amounts due at maturity) as of December 31, 2018, and excludes the effects of interest and debt issue costs ( in thousands ): Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Bank borrowings $ (1) $ — $ — $ — $ $ — $ — Senior unsecured notes (2) 48,160 Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (1) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we borrowed $26,400, net under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Accordingly, we have $138,400 outstanding and $461,600 available under our unsecured revolving line of credit. (2) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we paid $4,167 in regular scheduled principal payments, accordingly we have $528,862 outstanding and $98,000 available under our senior unsecured notes. |
Equity (Tables)
Equity (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Equity | |
Schedule of consolidated VIEs | As of December 31, 2018, we have the following consolidated VIEs ( in thousands ): Gross Investment Property Consolidated Non-Controlling Year (1) Purpose Type State Assets Interests 2018 Owned real estate ILF OR $ 14,400 (2) $ 2,857 (2) 2018 Owned real estate and development UDP OR 4,606 (2) 1,081 (2) 2017 Owned real estate and development UDP WI 16,665 (3) 2,272 (3) 2017 Owned real estate ALF SC 11,195 1,271 Total $ 46,866 $ 7,481 (1) Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we entered into a JV to purchase an existing operational 74-unit ALF/MC community. The non-controlling partner contributed $919 of equity and we contributed $15,950 in cash. Our economic interest in the real estate JV will be approximately 95%. We account for the JV on a consolidated basis. (2) We entered into a JV to develop, purchase and own seniors housing properties. During 2018, the JV purchased land for the development of a 78-unit ALF/MC for a total anticipated project cost of $18,108. The non-controlling partner contributed $1,081 of cash and we committed to fund the remaining $17,027 project cost. Additionally, during 2018, in a sale-leaseback transaction, the JV purchased an existing operational 89-unit ILF adjacent to the 78-unit ALF/MC we are developing for $14,400. The non-controlling partner contributed $2,857 of equity and we contributed $11,543 in cash. Upon completion of the development project, our combined economic interest in the JV will be approximately 88%. We account for the JV on a consolidated basis. (3) We entered into a JV to own the real estate and develop a 110-unit ILF/ALF/MC community in Wisconsin. The commitment totals approximately $22,471. |
Schedule of cash dividends declared and paid | We declared and paid the following cash dividends (in thousands) : Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Declared Paid Declared Paid Declared Paid Common Stock $ 90,372 (1) $ 90,372 (1) $ 90,219 (1) $ 90,219 (1) 84,568 (2) 84,568 (2) (1) Represents $0.19 per share per month for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017. (2) Represents $0.18 per share per month for January through September 2016 and $0.19 per share per month for October through December 2016. |
Schedule of restricted stock activity | Restricted Stock and Performance-Based Stock Units. Restricted stock and performance-based stock units activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was as follows: 2018 2017 2016 Outstanding, January 1 244,181 210,573 187,347 Granted 156,718 143,057 127,087 Vested (75,149) (85,343) (103,861) Cancelled — (24,106) — Outstanding, December 31 325,750 244,181 210,573 Compensation expense related to restricted stock and performance based stock units for the year $ 5,870,000 $ 5,247,000 $ 4,265,000 |
Schedule of restricted stock granted | During 2018, 2017 and 2016, we granted 156,718, 143,057 and 127,087 shares of restricted common stock and performance-based stock units, respectively, under the 2015 plan as follows: No. of Price per Year Shares/Units Share Vesting Period 2018 $ ratably over 3 years 66,171 $ 38.18 TSR targets (1) 8,728 $ 41.25 ratably over 1 year 2017 $ 45.76 ratably over 3 years 57,881 $ 45.76 TSR targets (1) 7,416 $ 48.55 ratably over 1 year 3,000 $ 50.50 ratably over 3 years 2016 $ ratably over 3 years 54,107 $ 46.87 TSR targets (2) 7,680 $ 46.87 ratably over 1 year (1) Vesting is based on achieving certain total shareholder return (“TSR”) targets in 4 years with acceleration opportunity in 3 years. (2) Vesting is based on achieving certain total TSR targets in 3.7 years with acceleration opportunity in 2.7 years. |
Schedule of restricted common stock and performance-based stock unit scheduled to vest and remaining compensation expense | At December 31, 2018, the total number of restricted common stock and performance-based stock units that are scheduled to vest and remaining compensation expense to be recognized related to the future service period of unvested outstanding restricted common stock and performance-based stock units are as follows: Number Remaining of Compensation Vesting Date Awards Expense 2019 128,214 (1) 4,250,000 2020 104,085 (2) 2,210,000 2021 93,451 (3) 238,000 Total 325,750 $ 6,698,000 (1) Includes 49,728 performance-based stock units. The performance-based stock units are valued utilizing a lattice-binomial option pricing model based on Monte Carlo simulations. The company recognizes the fair value of the awards over the applicable vesting period as compensation expense. (2) Includes 53,554 performance-based stock units. See (1) above for valuation methodology. (3) Includes 66,171 performance-based stock units. See (1) above for valuation methodology. |
Schedule of nonqualified stock option activity | Weighted Average Shares Price 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016 Outstanding, January 1 25,000 33,334 40,001 $ 32.92 $ 30.76 $ 29.60 Granted — — — n.a n.a n.a Exercised (5,000) (8,334) (6,667) $ 24.65 $ 24.31 $ 23.79 Canceled — — — n.a n.a n.a Outstanding, December 31 20,000 25,000 33,334 $ 34.99 $ 32.92 $ 30.76 Exercisable, December 31 (1) 20,000 25,000 28,334 $ 34.99 $ 32.92 $ 45.45 (1) The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at December 31, 2018, based upon the closing price of our common shares at December 31, 2018, the last trading day of 2018, was approximately $134,000. Options exercisable at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 3.3 years, 3.5 years, and 2.9 years, respectively. |
Schedule of options exercised | Weighted Average Options Exercise Option Market Exercised Price Value Value (1) 2018 5,000 $ 24.65 $ 123,000 $ 205,000 2017 8,334 $ 24.31 $ 202,000 $ 410,797 2016 6,667 $ 23.79 $ 159,000 $ 311,000 (1) As of the exercise dates. |
Commitments and Contingencies (
Commitments and Contingencies (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Commitments and Contingencies | |
Schedule of commitments | At December 31, 2018, we had commitments as follows (in thousands): Total Investment 2018 Commitment Remaining Commitment Funding Funded Commitment Real estate properties ( Note 5. Real Estate Investments ) $ 77,882 (1) $ 28,343 $ 45,787 $ 32,095 Accrued incentives and earn-out liabilities 9,000 (2) — — 9,000 Mortgage loans ( Note 5. Real Estate Investments ) 64,200 (3) 4,330 18,591 45,609 Joint venture investments ( Note 6. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures ) 25,650 670 23,684 1,966 Notes receivable ( Note 7. Notes Receivable ) 7,828 (4) 124 124 7,704 Total $ 184,560 $ 33,467 $ 88,186 $ 96,374 (1) Represents commitments to purchase land and improvements, if applicable, and to develop, re-develop, renovate or expand seniors housing and health care properties. Additionally, we have certain master leases that provide for additional capital expenditure allowance upon pre-approval of projects. (2) During the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, we recorded non-cash interest expense of $377 related to these contingent liabilities. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we entered into an amended master lease agreement with Senior Lifestyle. Among the provisions of the amendment, the contingent lease incentive payable to Senior Lifestyle was removed. Therefore, we wrote-off the Senior Lifestyle contingent lease incentive of $6,219 and the related earn-out liability of $9,292 which resulted in income of approximately $3,000. (3) $35,700 represents commitments to expand and renovate the seniors housing and health care properties securing the mortgage loans and $28,500 represents contingent funding upon the borrower achieving certain coverage ratios. (4) During the fourth quarter of 2018, we entered into a $6,800 mezzanine loan commitment for the development of a 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC in Georgia which will be funded during the first quarter of 2019. The mezzanine loan has a five-year term and bears interest at 12%, with 8% current-pay during the first 46 months of the loan, and the balance accruing to the note and 12% current-pay thereafter. |
Schedule of purchase options included in lease agreements | The following table summarizes information about purchase options included in our lease agreements: Type Number of of Gross Carrying Option State Property Properties Investments Value Window Kansas MC $ 25,692 $ 23,906 2019-2021 Texas MC 25,265 24,955 2025-2027 Total $ 50,957 $ 48,861 |
Distributions (Tables)
Distributions (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Distributions | |
Schedule of federal income tax classification of the per share common stock distributions | Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Ordinary taxable distribution $ 0.349 $ 1.607 $ 1.485 Return of capital — 0.444 0.556 Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain 0.636 0.163 0.149 Long-term capital gain 1.295 0.066 — Total $ 2.280 $ 2.280 $ 2.190 |
Net Income Per Common Share (Ta
Net Income Per Common Share (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Net Income Per Common Share | |
Schedule of basic and diluted net income per share | Basic and diluted net income per share was as follows (in thousands except per share amounts) : For the year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Net income $ $ $ Less income allocated to non-controlling interests (95) — — Less income allocated to participating securities: Non-forfeitable dividends on participating securities (357) (350) (373) Income allocated to participating securities (268) (12) (12) Total net income allocated to participating securities (625) (362) (385) Net income available to common stockholders Effect of dilutive securities: Participating securities 362 385 Net income for diluted net income per share $ $ $ Shares for basic net income per share 39,477 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options 3 10 13 Performance-based stock units 203 67 27 Participating securities 156 151 169 Total effect of dilutive securities 362 228 209 Shares for diluted net income per share 39,839 Basic net income per share $ 3.91 $ 2.21 $ 2.21 Diluted net income per share $ 3.89 $ 2.20 $ 2.21 |
Quarterly Financial Informati_2
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Quarterly Financial Information | |
Schedule of quarterly financial information | For the quarter ended March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, (unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts) 2018 Revenues $ 41,810 $ 41,472 $ 41,776 $ 43,587 Net income available to common stockholders $ 20,271 $ 68,658 $ 34,782 $ 30,645 Net income per common share available to common stockholders: Basic $ 0.51 $ 1.74 $ 0.88 $ 0.78 Diluted $ 0.51 $ 1.73 $ 0.88 $ 0.77 Dividends per share declared $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 Dividends per share paid $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 2017 Revenues $ 42,622 $ 42,468 $ 41,246 $ 41,729 Net income available to common stockholders $ 21,416 $ 25,273 $ 20,536 $ 19,753 Net income per common share available to common stockholders: Basic $ 0.54 $ 0.64 $ 0.52 $ 0.50 Diluted $ 0.54 $ 0.64 $ 0.52 $ 0.50 Dividends per share declared $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 Dividends per share paid $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 NOTE: Quarterly and year‑to‑date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share amounts for the year. |
Fair Value Measurements (Tables
Fair Value Measurements (Tables) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Fair Value Measurements | |
Schedule of carrying value and fair value of the entity's financial instruments | The carrying value and fair value of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 assuming election of fair value for our financial assets and financial liabilities were as follows ( in thousands ): At December 31, 2018 At December 31, 2017 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Value Value Value Value Mortgage loans receivable $ 242,939 $ 295,492 (1) $ 223,907 $ 278,224 (1) Bank borrowings 112,000 112,000 (2) 96,500 96,500 (2) Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issue costs 533,029 508,613 (3) 571,002 577,126 (3) Accrued incentives and earn-outs — — (4) 8,916 8,916 (4) (1) Our investment in mortgage loans receivable is classified as Level 3. The fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is determined using our assumption on market conditions adjusted for market and credit risk and current returns on our investments. The discount rate used to value our future cash inflows of the mortgage loans receivable at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 9.0% and 8.7%, respectively. (2) Our bank borrowings bear interest at a variable interest rate. The estimated fair value of our bank borrowings approximated their carrying values at December 31, 2018 and 2017 based upon prevailing market interest rates for similar debt arrangements. (3) Our obligation under our senior unsecured notes is classified as Level 3 and thus the fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is measured based upon management’s estimates of rates currently prevailing for comparable loans available to us, and instruments of comparable maturities. At December 31, 2018, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 5.15% for those maturing before year 2026 and 5.40% for those maturing at or beyond year 2026. At December 31, 2017, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 4.10% for those maturing before year 2026 and 4.30% for those maturing beyond year 2026. (4) Our contingent obligations under the accrued incentives and earn‑out liabilities are classified as Level 3. We estimated the fair value of the contingent earn‑out payments using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate that we use consists of a risk‑free U.S. Treasury rate plus a company specific credit spread which we believe is acceptable by willing market participants. At December 31, 2017 the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of the earn-out liability was 6.2%. Furthermore, during the fourth quarter of 2018, we entered into an amended master lease agreement with Senior Lifestyle. Among the provisions of the amendment, the contingent lease incentive payable to Senior Lifestyle was removed. Therefore, we wrote-off the Senior Lifestyle contingent earn-out liability of $9,292. . |
The Company (Details)
The Company (Details) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018segment | |
The Company | |
Number of operating segments | 1 |
Summary of Significant Accoun_3
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Restricted Cash (Details) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |
Jun. 30, 2018USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2018USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2017item | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |||
Number of beds damaged | item | 170 | ||
Gross value of damaged property | $ 2,021,000 | ||
Carrying value of damaged property | 1,133,000 | ||
Insurance proceeds | $ 2,619,000 | $ 2,619,000 |
Summary of Significant Accoun_4
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Owned Properties (Details) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Computer Equipment | Minimum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 3 years |
Computer Equipment | Maximum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 5 years |
Furniture and Fixtures | Minimum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 5 years |
Furniture and Fixtures | Maximum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 15 years |
Building | Minimum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 35 years |
Building | Maximum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 50 years |
Site Improvements | Minimum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 10 years |
Site Improvements | Maximum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 15 years |
Building Improvements | Minimum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 10 years |
Building Improvements | Maximum | |
Owned Properties | |
Useful life | 20 years |
Summary of Significant Accoun_5
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Mezzanine Loans and Impairments (Details) - USD ($) | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Impairments | |||
Asset Impairment Charges | $ 0 | $ 1,880,000 | $ 766,000 |
Minimum | Mezzanine Loans | |||
Mortgage loans on real estate | |||
Interest rate for mortgage loan (as a percent) | 12.00% | ||
Loan Term | 4 years | ||
Maximum | Mezzanine Loans | |||
Mortgage loans on real estate | |||
Interest rate for mortgage loan (as a percent) | 18.00% | ||
Loan Term | 8 years |
Summary of Significant Accoun_6
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Revenue Recognition (Details) | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($) | |
Revenue Recognition | |||
Maximum period over which loan is to be considered as non-performing | 60 days | ||
Contingent rental income | $ | $ 470,000 | $ 457,000 | $ 517,000 |
Maximum period over which a lease is to be considered as non-performing | 60 days | ||
Minimum | |||
Revenue Recognition | |||
Methods used for calculation of annual increases over the rents of the prior year | 1 | ||
Specified annual increase over the prior year's rent (as a percent) | 2.00% | ||
Maximum | |||
Revenue Recognition | |||
Methods used for calculation of annual increases over the rents of the prior year | 4 | ||
Specified annual increase over the prior year's rent (as a percent) | 3.00% |
Summary of Significant Accoun_7
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Taxes (Details) | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($) | |
Federal Income Taxes | |||
Provision for federal or state income taxes | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Minimum distribution of taxable income (as a percent) | 90.00% | ||
Distribution percentage | 100 | ||
Period considered for calculation of depreciation for federal tax purpose | 27 years 6 months | ||
Period considered for determining the taxability of distributions to shareholders | 40 years | ||
(Excess) / Deficit of book basis of net depreciable assets over tax basis | $ 25,639,000 |
Major Operators (Details)
Major Operators (Details) | Dec. 04, 2018USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2018propertyitem |
Major Operators | ||
Number of major operators | 4 | |
Number of beds/units | 811 | |
Prestige Healthcare | SNF | ||
Major Operators | ||
Number of beds | property | 24 | |
Number of beds/units | 3,010 | |
Prestige Healthcare | ALF | ||
Major Operators | ||
Number of beds/units | 93 | |
Senior Lifestyle Corporation | ALF | ||
Major Operators | ||
Number of beds | property | 23 | |
Number of beds/units | 1,457 | |
Brookdale Senior Living | ALF | ||
Major Operators | ||
Number of beds | property | 37 | |
Number of beds/units | 1,702 | |
Senior Care Centers | ||
Major Operators | ||
Petition Date and Reject The Lease Period | 120 days | |
Letter of credit | $ | $ 2,000,000 | |
Maintenance and repair escrows | $ | 2,200,000 | |
Property tax escrows | $ | $ 1,800,000 | |
Senior Care Centers | SNF | ||
Major Operators | ||
Number of beds | property | 11 | |
Number of beds/units | 1,444 | |
Operator Concentration Risk | SNF | ||
Major Operators | ||
Number of beds | property | 35 | |
Number of beds/units | 4,454 | |
Operator Concentration Risk | ALF | ||
Major Operators | ||
Number of beds | property | 60 | |
Number of beds/units | 3,252 | |
Total Revenue | Operator Concentration Risk | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 48.50% | |
Total Revenue | Operator Concentration Risk | Prestige Healthcare | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 18.00% | |
Total Revenue | Operator Concentration Risk | Senior Lifestyle Corporation | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 11.80% | |
Total Revenue | Operator Concentration Risk | Brookdale Senior Living | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 9.90% | |
Total Revenue | Operator Concentration Risk | Senior Care Centers | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 8.80% | |
Total Assets | Operator Concentration Risk | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 38.90% | |
Total Assets | Credit Concentration Risk | Prestige Healthcare | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 16.70% | |
Total Assets | Credit Concentration Risk | Senior Lifestyle Corporation | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 10.50% | |
Total Assets | Credit Concentration Risk | Brookdale Senior Living | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 4.60% | |
Total Assets | Credit Concentration Risk | Senior Care Centers | ||
Major Operators | ||
Concentration risk (as a percent) | 7.10% |
Supplemental Cash Flow Inform_3
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Non-cash investing and financing transactions: | |||
Reclassification of pre-development loans (Note 7) | $ 237 | ||
Restricted stock issued, net of cancellations (Note 10) | $ 1 | $ 1 | 1 |
Real estate properties | Accrued incentives and earn-out liabilities | |||
Non-cash investing and financing transactions: | |||
Contingent liabilities (Note 5) | $ 1,847 |
Real Estate Investments - Owned
Real Estate Investments - Owned Properties (Details) - Real Estate Investment | Dec. 31, 2018property |
Real Estate Investments | |
Number of properties | 175 |
Number of states | 28 |
Number of operators | 28 |
ALF | |
Real Estate Investments | |
Number of properties | 103 |
SNF | |
Real Estate Investments | |
Number of properties | 71 |
Hospital | |
Real Estate Investments | |
Number of properties | 1 |
Real Estate Investments - Depre
Real Estate Investments - Depreciation and Base Rents (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)lease | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($) | |
Depreciation | |||
Depreciation expense | $ 37,416 | $ 37,492 | $ 35,809 |
Number of master leases with agreed upon cash rent | lease | 2 | ||
Future minimum base rents receivable under the remaining non-cancelable terms of operating leases excluding the effects of straight-line rent and renewal options | |||
2,019 | $ 133,666 | ||
2,020 | 140,353 | ||
2,021 | 131,284 | ||
2,022 | 121,235 | ||
2,023 | 124,897 | ||
Thereafter | $ 760,163 |
Real Estate Investments - Opera
Real Estate Investments - Operator changes (Details) | Dec. 04, 2018USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2018USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2017property |
Anthem Memory Care | |||
Other disclosures | |||
Number of properties in default | property | 11 | ||
Minimum cash rent received | $ 5,200,000 | ||
Senior Care Centers | |||
Other disclosures | |||
Petition Date and Reject The Lease Period | 120 days | ||
Letter of credit | $ 2,000,000 | ||
Maintenance and repair escrows | 2,200,000 | ||
Property tax escrows | $ 1,800,000 |
Real Estate Investments - Acqui
Real Estate Investments - Acquisitions (Details) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||
Mar. 31, 2019USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)itemproperty | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($)itemproperty | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($)itemproperty | |
Real estate investments | ||||
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | $ 7,481,000 | $ 3,488,000 | ||
Investment Commitment | 184,560,000 | |||
ALF and MC | 74-Unit ALF/MC | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 74 | |||
Real Estate Investment Economic Interest in Joint Venture Percentage | 95.00% | |||
2018 Acquisitions | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | 40,295,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 113,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 40,408,000 | |||
Number of properties acquired | property | 3 | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 177 | |||
Real Estate Investment Economic Interest in Joint Venture Percentage | 88.00% | |||
2018 Acquisitions | ALF | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 39,600,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 65,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 39,665,000 | |||
Number of properties acquired | property | 3 | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 177 | |||
2018 Acquisitions | ILF | 89-unit ILF | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 14,400,000 | |||
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | 2,857,000 | |||
Investment Commitment | $ 11,543,000 | |||
Number of beds/units under development | item | 89 | |||
2018 Acquisitions | MC | Texas | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Number of properties acquired | property | 2 | |||
2018 Acquisitions | Land | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 695,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 48,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | 743,000 | |||
2018 Acquisitions | ALF and MC | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Real Estate Investment Economic Interest in Joint Venture Percentage | 95.00% | |||
2018 Acquisitions | ALF and MC | 74-Unit ALF/MC | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | $ 919,000 | |||
Investment Commitment | 15,950,000 | |||
2018 Acquisitions | ALF and MC | 78-unit ALF/MC | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | 18,108,000 | |||
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | $ 1,081,000 | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 78 | |||
Investment Commitment | $ 17,027,000 | |||
Number of beds/units under development | item | 78 | |||
2017 Acquisitions | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | 81,818,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 587,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 82,405,000 | |||
Number of properties acquired | property | 5 | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 400 | |||
2017 Acquisitions | ALF | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 81,018,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 569,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 81,587,000 | |||
Number of properties acquired | property | 5 | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 400 | |||
2017 Acquisitions | Land | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 800,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 18,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 818,000 | |||
2016 Acquisitions | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 76,441,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 576,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 77,017,000 | |||
Number of properties acquired | property | 5 | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 376 | |||
2016 Acquisitions | SNF | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 16,000,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 45,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 16,045,000 | |||
Number of properties acquired | property | 1 | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 126 | |||
2016 Acquisitions | ALF | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 53,550,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 423,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 53,973,000 | |||
Number of properties acquired | property | 4 | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 250 | |||
2016 Acquisitions | MC | Kansas | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Number of properties acquired | property | 2 | |||
2016 Acquisitions | Land | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Purchase Price | $ 6,891,000 | |||
Transaction Costs | 108,000 | |||
Total Acquisition Costs | $ 6,999,000 | |||
Subsequent Event | ALF and MC | 74-Unit ALF/MC | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | 919,000 | |||
Investment Commitment | $ 15,950,000 | |||
Subsequent Event | 2018 Acquisitions | ALF and MC | 74-Unit ALF/MC | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 919 | |||
Real Estate Investment Economic Interest in Joint Venture Percentage | 95.00% | |||
Number of beds/units under development | item | 74 | |||
Subsequent Event | 2018 Acquisitions | ALF and MC | 78-unit ALF/MC | ||||
Real estate investments | ||||
Contingent consideration | $ 15,950,000 |
Real Estate Investments - Types
Real Estate Investments - Types of property Development and Improvement (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Real estate investments | |||
Invested in projects | $ 33,467 | ||
Developments | Development and Improvement Commitments | |||
Real estate investments | |||
Invested in projects | 35,279 | $ 22,901 | $ 42,342 |
Improvements | Development and Improvement Commitments | |||
Real estate investments | |||
Invested in projects | 3,249 | 2,899 | 6,792 |
ALF | Developments | Development and Improvement Commitments | |||
Real estate investments | |||
Invested in projects | 27,505 | 17,667 | 41,859 |
ALF | Improvements | Development and Improvement Commitments | |||
Real estate investments | |||
Invested in projects | 2,292 | 1,152 | 3,034 |
SNF | Developments | Development and Improvement Commitments | |||
Real estate investments | |||
Invested in projects | 7,774 | 5,234 | 483 |
SNF | Improvements | Development and Improvement Commitments | |||
Real estate investments | |||
Invested in projects | 500 | 1,356 | $ 3,758 |
Other | Improvements | Development and Improvement Commitments | |||
Real estate investments | |||
Invested in projects | $ 457 | $ 391 |
Real Estate Investments - Devel
Real Estate Investments - Development and Improvement Projects (Details) - Real Estate Investment Completed Projects $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)itemproperty | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($)itemproperty | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($)itemproperty | |
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Number of Beds/Units | item | 66 | 66 | 611 |
Total Investment | $ | $ 14,998 | $ 13,498 | $ 81,561 |
ALF and MC | Developments | South Carolina | |||
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | ||
Number of Beds/Units | item | 89 | ||
Total Investment | $ | $ 15,080 | ||
ILF | Developments | Kansas | |||
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | ||
Number of Beds/Units | item | 108 | ||
Total Investment | $ | $ 13,423 | ||
SNF | Improvements | Arizona | |||
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | ||
Number of Beds/Units | item | 160 | ||
Total Investment | $ | $ 4,672 | ||
MC Units | Developments | Illinois | |||
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | 1 | |
Number of Beds/Units | item | 66 | 66 | |
Total Investment | $ | $ 14,998 | $ 13,498 | |
MC Units | Developments | Texas | |||
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | ||
Number of Beds/Units | item | 56 | ||
Total Investment | $ | $ 11,776 | ||
MC Units | Developments | California | |||
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | ||
Number of Beds/Units | item | 66 | ||
Total Investment | $ | $ 12,400 | ||
MC Units | Developments | Real Estate Development Commitments, Commitments One | Illinois | |||
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | ||
Number of Beds/Units | item | 66 | ||
Total Investment | $ | $ 12,248 | ||
MC Units | Developments | Real Estate Development Commitments, Commitments Two | Illinois | |||
Completed development and improvement projects | |||
Number of Properties | property | 1 | ||
Number of Beds/Units | item | 66 | ||
Total Investment | $ | $ 11,962 |
Real Estate Investments - Prope
Real Estate Investments - Properties held-for-sale (Details) $ in Thousands | Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)itemproperty | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) |
Real estate investments | ||
Accumulated depreciation | $ 312,959 | $ 304,117 |
Number of beds/units | item | 811 | |
Properties held-for-sale | ||
Real estate investments | ||
Number of properties | property | 1 | |
Gross Investment | $ 5,746 | |
Accumulated depreciation | $ 1,916 | |
Number of beds/units | item | 140 | |
ILF | Properties held-for-sale | Texas | ||
Real estate investments | ||
Number of properties | property | 1 | |
Gross Investment | $ 5,746 | |
Accumulated depreciation | $ 1,916 | |
Number of beds/units | item | 140 |
Real Estate Investments - Pro_2
Real Estate Investments - Property Sales (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)itemproperty | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($)itemproperty | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($)itemproperty | |
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | $ 1,106,581 | $ 1,086,089 | |
Proceeds from sale of real estate, net | 92,749 | 15,413 | $ 17,369 |
Net Gain (Loss) | 70,682 | 3,814 | 3,582 |
Impairment charges | 1,880 | 766 | |
Properties sold | |||
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | 22,393 | 11,277 | 13,789 |
Sales price | $ 95,825 | $ 15,650 | $ 17,450 |
Number of beds or units in property sold | item | 774 | 296 | 409 |
Number of properties sold | property | 10 | 6 | 5 |
Net Gain (Loss) | $ 70,682 | $ 3,814 | $ 3,582 |
Properties sold | ALF | |||
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | 16,352 | ||
Sales price | $ 67,500 | ||
Number of beds or units in property sold | item | 320 | ||
Number of properties sold | property | 6 | ||
Net Gain (Loss) | $ 48,695 | ||
Properties sold | ALF | Florida | |||
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | 4,869 | ||
Sales price | $ 6,850 | ||
Number of beds or units in property sold | item | 174 | ||
Number of properties sold | property | 2 | ||
Net Gain (Loss) | $ 1,973 | ||
Properties sold | ALF | Kansas | |||
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | 346 | ||
Sales price | 350 | ||
Properties sold | ALF | Indiana and Iowa | |||
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | 10,107 | ||
Sales price | $ 15,650 | ||
Number of beds or units in property sold | item | 211 | ||
Number of properties sold | property | 5 | ||
Net Gain (Loss) | $ 4,985 | ||
Properties sold | SNF | Alabama | |||
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | 5,695 | ||
Sales price | $ 27,975 | ||
Number of beds or units in property sold | item | 454 | ||
Number of properties sold | property | 4 | ||
Net Gain (Loss) | $ 21,987 | ||
Properties sold | SNF | Texas | |||
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | $ 1,170 | 4,923 | |
Sales price | $ 6,750 | ||
Number of beds or units in property sold | item | 85 | 235 | |
Number of properties sold | property | 1 | 2 | |
Net Gain (Loss) | $ (1,171) | $ 1,802 | |
Properties sold | OTH | New Jersey | |||
Disposals and other | |||
Carrying value | 3,997 | ||
Sales price | $ 3,850 | ||
Number of properties sold | property | 1 | ||
Net Gain (Loss) | $ (193) |
Real Estate Investments - Mortg
Real Estate Investments - Mortgage Loans (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Mortgage Loans | |||
Originations and fundings under mortgage loans receivable | $ 21,364 | $ 11,913 | $ 20,685 |
Pay-offs received | (1,086) | (16,665) | (6,036) |
Scheduled principal payments received | (1,050) | (1,198) | (2,242) |
Mortgage loan (premiums) | (4) | (4) | (10) |
(Provision for)/ recovery of loan loss reserve | (192) | 60 | (125) |
Net increase (decrease) in mortgage loans receivable | $ 19,032 | $ (5,894) | $ 12,272 |
Mortgage Loans | |||
Mortgage Loans | |||
General amortization schedule of mortgage loans | 30 years | ||
Mortgage Loans | Minimum | |||
Mortgage Loans | |||
Interest rate for mortgage loan (as a percent) | 9.20% | ||
General amortization schedule of mortgage loans | 30 years | ||
Mortgage Loans | Maximum | |||
Mortgage Loans | |||
Interest rate for mortgage loan (as a percent) | 9.70% | ||
Specified basis points for annual increase in interest rate (as a percent) | 0.0225% |
Real Estate Investments - Mor_2
Real Estate Investments - Mortgage Loan Activity (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)item | |
Mortgage Loans | |
Number of Units in Real Estate Property | 811 |
Mortgage Loans | |
Mortgage Loans | |
General amortization schedule of mortgage loans | 30 years |
Michigan | Mortgages with 8.7% Interest, fixed for five years, and escalating by 2.25% thereafter | SNF | |
Mortgage Loans | |
Interest rate for mortgage loan (as a percent) | 8.70% |
Specified basis points for annual increase in interest rate (as a percent) | 2.25% |
General amortization schedule of mortgage loans | 5 years |
Michigan | Mortgages with 8.7% Interest, fixed for five years, and escalating by 2.25% thereafter | SNF | SNF Beds | |
Mortgage Loans | |
Number of Units in Real Estate Property | 112 |
Michigan | Mortgages with 9.41% Interest, fixed for five years, and escalating by 2.25% thereafter | SNF | |
Mortgage Loans | |
Interest rate for mortgage loan (as a percent) | 9.41% |
Specified basis points for annual increase in interest rate (as a percent) | 2.25% |
General amortization schedule of mortgage loans | 5 years |
Additions to mortgage loans | $ | $ 7,125 |
Michigan | Mortgages with 9.41% Interest, fixed for five years, and escalating by 2.25% thereafter | SNF | SNF Beds | |
Mortgage Loans | |
Number of Units in Real Estate Property | 126 |
Michigan | Mortgage Loans | Mortgages with 8.7% Interest, fixed for five years, and escalating by 2.25% thereafter | SNF | |
Mortgage Loans | |
Additions to mortgage loans | $ | $ 7,400 |
Real Estate Investments - Mor_3
Real Estate Investments - Mortgage Loans - Scheduled Principal Payments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 |
Mortgage Loans | ||
Carrying value of mortgage loans | $ 242,939 | $ 223,907 |
Mortgage Loans | ||
Mortgage Loans | ||
Carrying value of mortgage loans | 242,939 | $ 223,907 |
Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loan receivables | ||
2,019 | 1,065 | |
2,020 | 8,815 | |
2,021 | 1,175 | |
2,022 | 1,175 | |
2,023 | 1,175 | |
Thereafter | 231,981 | |
Total | $ 245,386 |
Real Estate Investments - Mor_4
Real Estate Investments - Mortgage Loans - Early Payoffs (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)loan | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($)loan | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($)loan | |
Early mortgage loan payoffs | |||
Pay-offs received | $ 1,086 | $ 16,665 | $ 6,036 |
AZ/MI/PA/TX/VA | Mortgage Loans | |||
Early mortgage loan payoffs | |||
Pay-offs received | $ 10,795 | ||
Number of Loans | loan | 4 | ||
UT | Mortgage Loans | |||
Early mortgage loan payoffs | |||
Pay-offs received | $ 1,086 | ||
Number of Loans | loan | 1 | ||
MI/TX/WA | Mortgage Loans | |||
Early mortgage loan payoffs | |||
Pay-offs received | $ 6,036 | ||
Number of Loans | loan | 9 |
Investment in Unconsolidated _3
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures - Investment (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)loanitem | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($) | |
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |||
Number of beds/units | item | 811 | ||
Investment commitment | $ 31,950 | ||
Carrying Value | 30,615 | $ 29,898 | |
Capital Contributions | 670 | 3,848 | $ 1,770 |
Income Recognized | 2,864 | 2,263 | 1,138 |
Cash Interest Received | $ 2,371 | 1,738 | 1,695 |
Joint Venture | |||
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |||
Number of Loans | loan | 2 | ||
Combination ALF, MC and ILF community | Preferred Equity Investment | Joint Venture | Not primary beneficiary | |||
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |||
Preferred return percentage | 15.00% | ||
Currently paid in cash as a percentage | 7.00% | ||
Number of beds/units | item | 585 | ||
Investment commitment | $ 25,650 | ||
Carrying Value | 24,032 | ||
Capital Contributions | 670 | 1,101 | 1,770 |
Income Recognized | 2,041 | 1,560 | 1,138 |
Cash Interest Received | 1,975 | 1,436 | $ 1,695 |
Combination ALF/IL/MC | Mezzanine Loans | Joint Venture | Not primary beneficiary | |||
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |||
Income Recognized | 511 | 511 | |
Cash Interest Received | $ 396 | 302 | |
Combination ALF/IL/MC | Mezzanine Loans | ADC Arrangement | |||
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |||
Preferred return percentage | 15.00% | ||
Currently paid in cash as a percentage | 12.00% | ||
Number of beds/units | item | 99 | ||
Investment commitment | $ 2,900 | ||
Carrying Value | 3,183 | ||
Combination UDP-ALF/MC | Mezzanine Loans | Joint Venture | Not primary beneficiary | |||
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |||
Capital Contributions | 2,747 | ||
Income Recognized | 312 | 192 | |
Amount withheld for interest | $ 177 | $ 653 | |
Combination UDP-ALF/MC | Mezzanine Loans | ADC Arrangement | |||
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | |||
Preferred return percentage | 15.00% | ||
Currently paid in cash as a percentage | 10.00% | ||
Number of beds/units | item | 127 | ||
Investment commitment | $ 3,400 | ||
Carrying Value | $ 3,400 |
Notes Receivable - Components (
Notes Receivable - Components (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 |
Notes receivable activities | ||
Notes receivable reserve | $ (128) | $ (166) |
Total | 12,715 | 16,402 |
Mezzanine loans | ||
Notes receivable activities | ||
Financing Receivable, Gross | 9,868 | 13,700 |
Other loans | ||
Notes receivable activities | ||
Financing Receivable, Gross | $ 2,975 | $ 2,868 |
Notes Receivable - Other Inform
Notes Receivable - Other Information (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Loans and Leases Receivable Disclosure [Abstract] | |||
Advances under notes receivable | $ 124 | $ 14,969 | |
Principal payments received under notes receivable | (3,848) | $ (25) | (100) |
Reclassified to real estate under development | (237) | ||
Notes Receivable reserve | 37 | (166) | |
Net (decrease) increase in notes receivable | $ (3,687) | $ (25) | $ 14,466 |
Notes Receivable - New Loan Com
Notes Receivable - New Loan Commitment (Details) - Mezzanine loans | 3 Months Ended | |
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | |
Notes receivable activities | ||
Notes receivable, gross | $ 9,868,000 | $ 13,700,000 |
204-unit ILF/ALF/MC | ||
Notes receivable activities | ||
Notes receivable, gross | $ 6,828,000 | |
Number of beds/units under development | item | 204 | |
Loan Term | 5 years | |
Interest rate (as a percent) | 12.00% | |
Mezzanine loan with 8% Interest, fixed for 46 months, and increasing to 12% thereafter | 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC | ||
Notes receivable activities | ||
Loan Term | 46 months | |
Interest rate (as a percent) | 8.00% | |
Mezzanine loan with 12% Interest | 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC | ||
Notes receivable activities | ||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 12.00% |
Lease Incentives (Details)
Lease Incentives (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($)item | |
Lease Incentives | |||
Non-contingent lease incentives | $ 14,443 | $ 14,904 | |
Contingent lease incentives | 6,577 | ||
Total | 14,443 | 21,481 | |
Non-contingent lease incentives, funding | 1,272 | 6,544 | $ 4,559 |
Contingent lease incentives, funding | 268 | ||
Total funding | 1,272 | 6,544 | 4,827 |
Non-contingent lease incentives, Amortization | (1,733) | (1,590) | (1,207) |
Contingent lease incentives, Amortization | (359) | (619) | (748) |
Total amortization | (2,092) | (2,209) | (1,955) |
Non-contingent lease incentives, Write off | (1,205) | ||
Contingent lease incentives, Write off | (2,634) | (514) | |
Total Write off | $ (6,219) | $ (3,839) | $ (514) |
Number of properties with lease incentives write-offs | item | 2 | 2 |
Debt Obligations - Bank Borrowi
Debt Obligations - Bank Borrowings Terms (Details) | 12 Months Ended | |
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | |
Debt Obligations | ||
Maximum available under facility | $ 1,000,000,000 | $ 600,000,000 |
Additional extension period option | 1 year | |
Unused commitment fee (as a percent) | 20.00% | |
LIBOR | ||
Debt Obligations | ||
Basis spread over base rate (as a percent) | 115.00% | |
Bank Borrowings | ||
Financial covenants | ||
Maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value | 0.5 | |
Maximum ratio of secured debt to total asset value | 0.35 | |
Maximum ratio of unsecured debt to the value of the unencumbered asset pool | 0.6 | |
Minimum ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges | 1.50 | |
Private Shelf Agreement Prudential | Senior Unsecured Notes | ||
Debt Obligations | ||
Maximum available under facility | $ 337,500,000 |
Debt Obligations - Summary (Det
Debt Obligations - Summary (Details) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||
Mar. 31, 2019 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Debt Obligations | ||||
Applicable Interest Rate (as a percent) | 4.36% | |||
Outstanding Balance | $ 645,029,000 | $ 667,502,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | 581,833,000 | 567,167,000 | ||
Borrowings | 116,200,000 | 213,000,000 | $ 201,100,000 | |
Payments on debt | $ 138,866,000 | 154,767,000 | 163,667,000 | |
Bank Borrowings | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Applicable Interest Rate (as a percent) | 3.69% | |||
Outstanding Balance | $ 112,000,000 | 96,500,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | 488,000,000 | 503,500,000 | ||
Borrowings | 116,200,000 | 113,000,000 | 123,600,000 | |
Payments on debt | $ 100,700,000 | 123,600,000 | 137,000,000 | |
Bank Borrowings | Subsequent Event | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Outstanding Balance | $ 138,400,000 | |||
Available for borrowing | 461,600,000 | |||
Borrowings | 26,400,000 | |||
Senior Unsecured Notes | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Applicable Interest Rate (as a percent) | 4.50% | |||
Outstanding Balance | $ 533,029,000 | 571,002,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | 93,833,000 | 63,667,000 | ||
Borrowings | 100,000,000 | 77,500,000 | ||
Payments on debt | $ 38,166,000 | $ 31,167,000 | $ 26,667,000 | |
Senior Unsecured Notes | Subsequent Event | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Outstanding Balance | 528,862,000 | |||
Available for borrowing | 98,000,000 | |||
Payments on debt | $ 4,167,000 |
Debt Obligations - Borrowings a
Debt Obligations - Borrowings and Payments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Debt Obligations | |||
Borrowings | $ 116,200 | $ 213,000 | $ 201,100 |
Repayments | $ (138,866) | (154,767) | (163,667) |
Applicable Interest Rate (as a percent) | 4.36% | ||
Bank Borrowings | |||
Debt Obligations | |||
Borrowings | $ 116,200 | 113,000 | 123,600 |
Repayments | $ (100,700) | (123,600) | (137,000) |
Applicable Interest Rate (as a percent) | 3.69% | ||
Senior Unsecured Notes | |||
Debt Obligations | |||
Borrowings | 100,000 | 77,500 | |
Repayments | $ (38,166) | $ (31,167) | $ (26,667) |
Applicable Interest Rate (as a percent) | 4.50% | ||
Senior Unsecured Notes | Private Shelf Agreement Prudential | |||
Debt Obligations | |||
Debt term | 15 years | 10 years | |
Face amount of debt | $ 100,000 | $ 37,500 | |
Stated interest rate (as a percent) | 4.50% | 4.15% | |
Senior Unsecured Notes | Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement AIG | |||
Debt Obligations | |||
Debt term | 10 years | ||
Face amount of debt | $ 40,000 | ||
Stated interest rate (as a percent) | 3.99% |
Debt Obligations - Future Matur
Debt Obligations - Future Maturities (Details) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||
Mar. 31, 2019 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Scheduled Principal Payments | ||||
2,019 | $ 33,667,000 | |||
2,020 | 40,160,000 | |||
2,021 | 47,160,000 | |||
2,022 | 160,160,000 | |||
2,023 | 49,160,000 | |||
Thereafter | 315,660,000 | |||
Total | 645,967,000 | |||
Other information | ||||
Amount borrowed | 116,200,000 | $ 213,000,000 | $ 201,100,000 | |
Outstanding Balance | 645,029,000 | 667,502,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | 581,833,000 | 567,167,000 | ||
Payments on debt | 138,866,000 | 154,767,000 | 163,667,000 | |
Bank Borrowings | ||||
Scheduled Principal Payments | ||||
2,022 | 112,000,000 | |||
Total | 112,000,000 | |||
Other information | ||||
Amount borrowed | 116,200,000 | 113,000,000 | 123,600,000 | |
Outstanding Balance | 112,000,000 | 96,500,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | 488,000,000 | 503,500,000 | ||
Payments on debt | 100,700,000 | 123,600,000 | 137,000,000 | |
Senior Unsecured Notes | ||||
Scheduled Principal Payments | ||||
2,019 | 33,667,000 | |||
2,020 | 40,160,000 | |||
2,021 | 47,160,000 | |||
2,022 | 48,160,000 | |||
2,023 | 49,160,000 | |||
Thereafter | 315,660,000 | |||
Total | 533,967,000 | |||
Other information | ||||
Amount borrowed | 100,000,000 | 77,500,000 | ||
Outstanding Balance | 533,029,000 | 571,002,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | 93,833,000 | 63,667,000 | ||
Payments on debt | $ 38,166,000 | $ 31,167,000 | $ 26,667,000 | |
Subsequent Event | Bank Borrowings | ||||
Other information | ||||
Amount borrowed | $ 26,400,000 | |||
Outstanding Balance | 138,400,000 | |||
Available for borrowing | 461,600,000 | |||
Subsequent Event | Senior Unsecured Notes | ||||
Other information | ||||
Outstanding Balance | 528,862,000 | |||
Available for borrowing | 98,000,000 | |||
Payments on debt | $ 4,167,000 |
Equity - Class of Stock Disclos
Equity - Class of Stock Disclosures - Common Stock and Shelf Registrations (Details) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||
Mar. 31, 2019 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Equity | ||||
Proceeds from common stock issued, net of issuance costs | $ 1,005,000 | $ 14,578,000 | $ 78,592,000 | |
Common Stock | ||||
Equity | ||||
Number of shares repurchased | 31,326 | 42,089 | 49,405 | |
Common Stock | Subsequent Event | ||||
Equity | ||||
Number of shares repurchased | 20,345 | |||
Common Stock | Equity Distribution Agreements | ||||
Equity | ||||
Maximum offering capacity under shelf registration statement | $ 200,000,000 | |||
Shares common stock sold | 22,244 | 312,881 | ||
Proceeds from common stock issued, net of issuance costs | $ 1,005,000 | $ 14,600,000 | ||
Compensation paid to sales agents | 18,000 | 260,000 | ||
Reclassification of accumulated costs to additional paid in capital | 76,000 | $ 49,000 | ||
Amount available under effective shelf registration statement | $ 184,139,000 |
Equity - Noncontrolling Interes
Equity - Noncontrolling Interest (Details) $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |
Mar. 31, 2019USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($)item | |
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Gross Consolidated Assets | $ 46,866 | ||
Non-controlling interests | 7,481 | $ 3,488 | |
Investment Commitment | $ 184,560 | ||
2017 Acquisitions | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 400 | ||
Purchase Price | $ 81,818 | ||
2017 Acquisitions | ALF | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 400 | ||
Purchase Price | $ 81,018 | ||
2018 Acquisitions | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 177 | ||
Purchase Price | $ 40,295 | ||
Economic interest in joint venture | 88.00% | ||
2018 Acquisitions | ALF | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 177 | ||
Purchase Price | $ 39,600 | ||
2018 Acquisitions | ALF and MC | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Economic interest in joint venture | 95.00% | ||
Oregon | 2018 Acquisitions | Properties under Development | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Gross Consolidated Assets | 4,606 | ||
Non-controlling interests | 1,081 | ||
Oregon | 2018 Acquisitions | ILF | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Gross Consolidated Assets | 14,400 | ||
Non-controlling interests | 2,857 | ||
Wisconsin | 2017 Acquisitions | Properties under Development | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Gross Consolidated Assets | 16,665 | ||
Non-controlling interests | 2,272 | ||
South Carolina | 2017 Acquisitions | ALF | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Gross Consolidated Assets | 11,195 | ||
Non-controlling interests | 1,271 | ||
110-unit ILF/ALF/MC | Wisconsin | 2017 Acquisitions | ALF/ILF/MC | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Investment Commitment | $ 22,471 | ||
Number of beds/units under development | item | 110 | ||
89-unit ILF | 2018 Acquisitions | ILF | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Non-controlling interests | 2,857 | ||
Purchase Price | 14,400 | ||
Investment Commitment | $ 11,543 | ||
Number of beds/units under development | item | 89 | ||
78-unit ALF/MC | 2018 Acquisitions | ALF and MC | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Non-controlling interests | $ 1,081 | ||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 78 | ||
Purchase Price | $ 18,108 | ||
Investment Commitment | $ 17,027 | ||
Number of beds/units under development | item | 78 | ||
74-Unit ALF/MC | ALF and MC | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Number of beds/units acquired | item | 74 | ||
Economic interest in joint venture | 95.00% | ||
74-Unit ALF/MC | 2018 Acquisitions | ALF and MC | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||
Non-controlling interests | $ 919 | ||
Investment Commitment | $ 15,950 |
Equity - Class of Stock Discl_2
Equity - Class of Stock Disclosures - Dividends and AOCI (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Nov. 30, 2018 | Oct. 31, 2018 | Sep. 30, 2018 | Aug. 31, 2018 | Jul. 31, 2018 | Jun. 30, 2018 | May 31, 2018 | Apr. 30, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2018 | Feb. 28, 2018 | Jan. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Nov. 30, 2017 | Oct. 31, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2017 | Aug. 31, 2017 | Jul. 31, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2017 | May 31, 2017 | Apr. 30, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Feb. 28, 2017 | Jan. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | Nov. 30, 2016 | Oct. 31, 2016 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Aug. 31, 2016 | Jul. 31, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 | May 31, 2016 | Apr. 30, 2016 | Mar. 31, 2016 | Feb. 29, 2016 | Jan. 31, 2016 | Mar. 31, 2019 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Sep. 30, 2018 | Jun. 30, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Dividend Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid | $ 90,372 | $ 90,219 | $ 84,568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 2.280 | $ 2.280 | $ 2.190 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event | Dividend Payable, October 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends Payable, Date to be Paid | Jan. 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends Payable, Date of Record | Jan. 23, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event | Dividend Payable, November 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends Payable, Date to be Paid | Feb. 28, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends Payable, Date of Record | Feb. 20, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event | Dividend Payable, December 2018 28, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends Payable, Date to be Paid | Mar. 29, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends Payable, Date of Record | Mar. 21, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declared | $ 90,372 | $ 90,219 | $ 84,568 | $ 90,372 | $ 90,219 | $ 90,372 | $ 90,219 | $ 84,568 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid | $ 90,372 | $ 90,219 | $ 84,568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 |
Equity - Restricted Stock and p
Equity - Restricted Stock and performance-based stock units (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||
Mar. 31, 2019 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | Dec. 31, 2015 | |
2015 Plan | |||||
Stock Based Compensation Plans | |||||
Total shares reserved for issuance | 825,457 | 1,400,000 | |||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year (in shares) | 325,750 | 244,181 | 210,573 | 187,347 | |
Granted (in shares) | 156,718 | 143,057 | 127,087 | ||
Vested (in shares) | (75,149) | (85,343) | (103,861) | ||
Canceled (in shares) | (24,106) | ||||
Outstanding at the end of the year (in shares) | 325,750 | 244,181 | 210,573 | ||
Compensation expense | |||||
Compensation expense related to share-based award | $ 5,870 | $ 5,247 | $ 4,265 | ||
Remaining compensation expense | $ 6,698 | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | 2019 | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year (in shares) | 128,214 | ||||
Outstanding at the end of the year (in shares) | 128,214 | ||||
Compensation expense | |||||
Remaining compensation expense | $ 4,250 | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | 2020 | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year (in shares) | 104,085 | ||||
Outstanding at the end of the year (in shares) | 104,085 | ||||
Compensation expense | |||||
Remaining compensation expense | $ 2,210 | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | 2021 | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year (in shares) | 93,451 | ||||
Outstanding at the end of the year (in shares) | 93,451 | ||||
Compensation expense | |||||
Remaining compensation expense | $ 238 | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $41.25 | One year Vesting | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Vesting period | 1 year | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $45.76 | Three year vesting | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 81,819 | ||||
Price per share | $ 38.18 | ||||
Vesting period | 3 years | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $45.76 | TSR Targets | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 66,171 | ||||
Price per share | $ 38.18 | ||||
Vesting period | 4 years | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $45.76 | Accelerated TSR Targets | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Vesting period | 3 years | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $48.55 | One year Vesting | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 7,416 | ||||
Price per share | $ 48.55 | ||||
Vesting period | 1 year | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $48.55 | Vesting Date, June 1, 2018 | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 8,728 | ||||
Price per share | $ 41.25 | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $50.50 | Three year vesting | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Vesting period | 3 years | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $43.24 | Three year vesting | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 74,760 | 65,300 | |||
Price per share | $ 45.76 | $ 43.24 | |||
Vesting period | 3 years | 3 years | |||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $46.87 | Three year vesting | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 3,000 | ||||
Price per share | $ 50.50 | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $46.87 | TSR Targets | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 57,881 | 54,107 | |||
Price per share | $ 45.76 | $ 46.87 | |||
Vesting period | 3 years 8 months 12 days | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $46.87 | Accelerated TSR Targets | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Vesting period | 2 years 8 months 12 days | ||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $46.87 | One year Vesting | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 7,680 | ||||
Price per share | $ 46.87 | ||||
Vesting period | 1 year | ||||
Performance-based stock units | 2019 | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year (in shares) | 49,728 | ||||
Outstanding at the end of the year (in shares) | 49,728 | ||||
Performance-based stock units | 2020 | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year (in shares) | 53,554 | ||||
Outstanding at the end of the year (in shares) | 53,554 | ||||
Performance-based stock units | 2021 | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year (in shares) | 66,171 | ||||
Outstanding at the end of the year (in shares) | 66,171 | ||||
Subsequent Event | Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | 2015 Plan | Grant Date Price $38.18 | |||||
Stock Based Compensation Plans | |||||
Stock options granted (in shares) | 139,112 | ||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 139,112 | ||||
Price per share | $ 46.54 | ||||
Subsequent Event | Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | 2015 Plan | Grant Date Price $38.18 | Three year vesting | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 78,276 | ||||
Vesting period | 3 years | ||||
Subsequent Event | Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | 2015 Plan | Grant Date Price $38.18 | TSR Targets | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Granted (in shares) | 60,836 | ||||
Vesting period | 4 years | ||||
Subsequent Event | Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | 2015 Plan | Grant Date Price $38.18 | Accelerated TSR Targets | |||||
Restricted stock and performance based stock units activity | |||||
Vesting period | 3 years |
Equity - Options (Details)
Equity - Options (Details) - Stock options - USD ($) | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Nonqualified stock option activity | |||
Outstanding, beginning of period | 25,000 | 33,334 | 40,001 |
Granted (in shares) | 0 | ||
Exercised (in shares) | (5,000) | (8,334) | (6,667) |
Outstanding, end of period | 20,000 | 25,000 | 33,334 |
Options exercisable at end of the period (in shares) | 20,000 | 25,000 | 28,334 |
Weighted Average Price | |||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year (in dollars per share) | $ 32.92 | $ 30.76 | $ 29.60 |
Exercised (in dollars per share) | 24.65 | 24.31 | 23.79 |
Outstanding at the end of the year (in dollars per share) | 34.99 | 32.92 | 30.76 |
Exercisable at the end of the period (in dollars per share) | $ 34.99 | $ 32.92 | $ 45.45 |
Other information | |||
Aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at the end of the year | $ 134,000 | ||
Weighted average remaining contractual life of options exercisable | 3 years 3 months 18 days | 3 years 6 months | 2 years 10 months 24 days |
Value of options exercised | $ 123,000 | $ 202,000 | $ 159,000 |
Market value of options on the date of exercise | 205,000 | 410,797 | 311,000 |
Compensation expense related to share-based award | $ 0 | $ 2,000 | $ 15,000 |
Commitments and Contingencies -
Commitments and Contingencies - Summary of Commitments (Details) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2018USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($) | |
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Investment Commitment | $ 184,560,000 | $ 184,560,000 | ||
2018 Funding | 33,467,000 | |||
Total Commitments funded | 88,186,000 | 88,186,000 | ||
Remaining commitment | 96,374,000 | 96,374,000 | ||
Amortization of Financing Costs | 377,000 | $ 602,000 | $ 684,000 | |
Contingent lease incentives, Write off | (2,634,000) | (514,000) | ||
Fair value of earn-out liability | 8,916,000 | |||
Operating Leases, Income Statement, Lease Revenue | 135,405,000 | 137,657,000 | $ 133,527,000 | |
Mezzanine loans | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Notes receivable, gross | 9,868,000 | 9,868,000 | $ 13,700,000 | |
Mezzanine loans | 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Notes receivable, gross | $ 6,828,000 | 6,828,000 | ||
Number of beds/units under development | item | 204 | |||
Loan Term | 5 years | |||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 12.00% | |||
Mezzanine loans | Mezzanine loan with 8% Interest, fixed for 46 months, and increasing to 12% thereafter | 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Loan Term | 46 months | |||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 8.00% | |||
Mezzanine loans | Mezzanine loan with 12% Interest | 204-unit ILF/ALF/MC | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 12.00% | |||
Master lease agreement | Senior Lifestyle | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Contingent lease incentives, Write off | (6,219,000) | |||
Earn-out liability, Write off | 9,292,000 | |||
Operating Leases, Income Statement, Lease Revenue | 3,000,000 | |||
Real Estate Investment | Accrued incentives and earn-out liabilities | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Amortization of Financing Costs | 377,000 | |||
Real estate properties | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Investment Commitment | $ 77,882,000 | 77,882,000 | ||
2018 Funding | 28,343,000 | |||
Total Commitments funded | 45,787,000 | 45,787,000 | ||
Remaining commitment | 32,095,000 | 32,095,000 | ||
Accrued incentives and earn-out liabilities | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Investment Commitment | 9,000,000 | 9,000,000 | ||
Remaining commitment | 9,000,000 | 9,000,000 | ||
Mortgage loans | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Investment Commitment | 64,200,000 | 64,200,000 | ||
2018 Funding | 4,330,000 | |||
Total Commitments funded | 18,591,000 | 18,591,000 | ||
Remaining commitment | 45,609,000 | 45,609,000 | ||
Commitments To Expand and Renovate Properties | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Investment Commitment | 35,700,000 | 35,700,000 | ||
Contingent Funding Commitments | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Investment Commitment | 28,500,000 | 28,500,000 | ||
Joint venture investments | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Investment Commitment | 25,650,000 | 25,650,000 | ||
2018 Funding | 670,000 | |||
Total Commitments funded | 23,684,000 | 23,684,000 | ||
Remaining commitment | 1,966,000 | 1,966,000 | ||
Notes receivable | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||
Investment Commitment | 7,828,000 | 7,828,000 | ||
2018 Funding | 124,000 | |||
Total Commitments funded | 124,000 | 124,000 | ||
Remaining commitment | $ 7,704,000 | $ 7,704,000 |
Commitments and Contingencies_2
Commitments and Contingencies - Contingent Consideration (Details) $ in Thousands | Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)property | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) |
Commitment | ||
Carrying value | $ 1,106,581 | $ 1,086,089 |
Purchase Options to Lessees | ||
Commitment | ||
Gross Investment | 50,957 | |
Carrying value | $ 48,861 | |
Purchase Options to Lessees | MC | Kansas | ||
Commitment | ||
Number of Real Estate Properties | property | 2 | |
Gross Investment | $ 25,692 | |
Carrying value | $ 23,906 | |
Purchase Options to Lessees | MC | Texas | ||
Commitment | ||
Number of Real Estate Properties | property | 2 | |
Gross Investment | $ 25,265 | |
Carrying value | $ 24,955 |
Distributions (Details)
Distributions (Details) - $ / shares | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||||||||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Sep. 30, 2018 | Jun. 30, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Distributions | |||||||||||
Minimum distribution of taxable income (as a percent) | 90.00% | ||||||||||
Ordinary taxable distribution | $ 0.349 | $ 1.607 | $ 1.485 | ||||||||
Return of capital | 0.444 | 0.556 | |||||||||
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain | 0.636 | 0.163 | 0.149 | ||||||||
Long-term capital gain | 1.295 | 0.066 | |||||||||
Total | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 2.280 | $ 2.280 | $ 2.190 |
Net Income Per Common Share (De
Net Income Per Common Share (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||||||||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Sep. 30, 2018 | Jun. 30, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Net income | $ 155,076 | $ 87,340 | $ 85,115 | ||||||||
Less income allocated to non-controlling interests | (95) | ||||||||||
Less income allocated to participating securities: | |||||||||||
Nonforfeitable dividends on participating securities | (357) | (350) | (373) | ||||||||
Income allocated to participating securities | (268) | (12) | (12) | ||||||||
Total net income allocated to participating securities | (625) | (362) | (385) | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ 30,645 | $ 34,782 | $ 68,658 | $ 20,271 | $ 19,753 | $ 20,536 | $ 25,273 | $ 21,416 | 154,356 | 86,978 | 84,730 |
Effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||||||
Participating securities | 625 | 362 | 385 | ||||||||
Net income for diluted net income per share | $ 154,981 | $ 87,340 | $ 85,115 | ||||||||
Shares for basic net income per share | 39,477 | 39,409 | 38,388 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: (Shares) | |||||||||||
Total effect of dilutive securities (in shares) | 362 | 228 | 209 | ||||||||
Shares for diluted net income per share | 39,839 | 39,637 | 38,597 | ||||||||
Basic (in dollars per share) | $ 0.78 | $ 0.88 | $ 1.74 | $ 0.51 | $ 0.50 | $ 0.52 | $ 0.64 | $ 0.54 | $ 3.91 | $ 2.21 | $ 2.21 |
Diluted (in dollars per share) | $ 0.77 | $ 0.88 | $ 1.73 | $ 0.51 | $ 0.50 | $ 0.52 | $ 0.64 | $ 0.54 | $ 3.89 | $ 2.20 | $ 2.21 |
Stock options | |||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: (Shares) | |||||||||||
Stock options and performance-based stock units (in shares) | 3 | 10 | 13 | ||||||||
Performance-based stock units | |||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: (Shares) | |||||||||||
Stock options and performance-based stock units (in shares) | 203 | 67 | 27 | ||||||||
Participating Securities | |||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: (Shares) | |||||||||||
Participating securities | 156 | 151 | 169 |
Quarterly Financial Informati_3
Quarterly Financial Information (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||||||||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Sep. 30, 2018 | Jun. 30, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Quarterly Financial Information | |||||||||||
Revenues | $ 43,587 | $ 41,776 | $ 41,472 | $ 41,810 | $ 41,729 | $ 41,246 | $ 42,468 | $ 42,622 | $ 168,645 | $ 168,065 | $ 161,583 |
Net income available to common stockholders | $ 30,645 | $ 34,782 | $ 68,658 | $ 20,271 | $ 19,753 | $ 20,536 | $ 25,273 | $ 21,416 | $ 154,356 | $ 86,978 | $ 84,730 |
Net income per common share available to common stockholders: | |||||||||||
Basic (in dollars per share) | $ 0.78 | $ 0.88 | $ 1.74 | $ 0.51 | $ 0.50 | $ 0.52 | $ 0.64 | $ 0.54 | $ 3.91 | $ 2.21 | $ 2.21 |
Diluted (in dollars per share) | 0.77 | 0.88 | 1.73 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 3.89 | 2.20 | 2.21 |
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | |||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 2.280 | $ 2.280 | $ 2.190 |
Fair Value Measurements (Detail
Fair Value Measurements (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | |
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($)item | |
Fair value measurements | ||
Mortgage loans receivable | $ 242,939 | $ 223,907 |
Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issue costs | 533,029 | 571,002 |
Accrued incentives and earn-outs | $ 8,916 | |
Senior Lifestyle | Master lease agreement | ||
Fair value measurements | ||
Contingent earn-out liability, write off | $ 9,292 | |
Level 3 | Senior Unsecured Notes maturing before 2026 | Discount Rate | Discounted Cash Flow Analysis | ||
Fair value measurements | ||
Future cash outflows discount rate (as a percent) | item | 5.15 | 4.10 |
Level 3 | Senior Unsecured Notes maturing 2026 and after | Discount Rate | Discounted Cash Flow Analysis | ||
Fair value measurements | ||
Future cash outflows discount rate (as a percent) | item | 5.40 | 4.30 |
Level 3 | Accrued incentives and earn-out liabilities | Discount Rate | Discounted Cash Flow Analysis | ||
Fair value measurements | ||
Future cash outflows discount rate (as a percent) | item | 6.20 | |
Level 3 | Mortgage Loans Receivable | Discount Rate | Discounted Cash Flow Analysis | ||
Fair value measurements | ||
Future cash inflows discount rate (as a percent) | item | 0.09 | 8.70 |
Carrying Value | ||
Fair value measurements | ||
Mortgage loans receivable | $ 242,939 | $ 223,907 |
Bank borrowings | 112,000 | 96,500 |
Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issue costs | 533,029 | 571,002 |
Accrued incentives and earn-outs | 8,916 | |
Fair Value | ||
Fair value measurements | ||
Bank borrowings | 112,000 | 96,500 |
Fair Value | Level 3 | ||
Fair value measurements | ||
Mortgage loans receivable | 295,492 | 278,224 |
Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issue costs | $ 508,613 | 577,126 |
Accrued incentives and earn-outs | $ 8,916 |
Subsequent Events - Debt Obliga
Subsequent Events - Debt Obligations (Details) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||
Mar. 31, 2019USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)item | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($) | |
Debt Obligations | ||||
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | $ 7,481,000 | $ 3,488,000 | ||
Investment Commitments. | 184,560,000 | |||
Amount borrowed | 116,200,000 | 213,000,000 | $ 201,100,000 | |
Payments on debt | 138,866,000 | 154,767,000 | 163,667,000 | |
Outstanding Balance | 645,029,000 | 667,502,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | 581,833,000 | 567,167,000 | ||
Bank Borrowings | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Amount borrowed | 116,200,000 | 113,000,000 | 123,600,000 | |
Payments on debt | 100,700,000 | 123,600,000 | 137,000,000 | |
Outstanding Balance | 112,000,000 | 96,500,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | 488,000,000 | 503,500,000 | ||
Bank Borrowings | Subsequent Event | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Amount borrowed | $ 26,400,000 | |||
Outstanding Balance | 138,400,000 | |||
Available for borrowing | 461,600,000 | |||
Senior Unsecured Notes | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Amount borrowed | 100,000,000 | 77,500,000 | ||
Payments on debt | 38,166,000 | 31,167,000 | $ 26,667,000 | |
Outstanding Balance | 533,029,000 | 571,002,000 | ||
Available for borrowing | $ 93,833,000 | $ 63,667,000 | ||
Senior Unsecured Notes | Subsequent Event | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Payments on debt | 4,167,000 | |||
Outstanding Balance | 528,862,000 | |||
Available for borrowing | $ 98,000,000 | |||
74-Unit ALF/MC | ALF and MC | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Number of Beds or Units in Real Estate Property Sold | item | 74 | |||
Real Estate Investment Economic Interest in Joint Venture Percentage | 95.00% | |||
74-Unit ALF/MC | ALF and MC | Subsequent Event | ||||
Debt Obligations | ||||
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | $ 919,000 | |||
Investment Commitments. | $ 15,950,000 |
Subsequent Events - Equity (Det
Subsequent Events - Equity (Details) - $ / shares | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Nov. 30, 2018 | Oct. 31, 2018 | Sep. 30, 2018 | Aug. 31, 2018 | Jul. 31, 2018 | Jun. 30, 2018 | May 31, 2018 | Apr. 30, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2018 | Feb. 28, 2018 | Jan. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Nov. 30, 2017 | Oct. 31, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2017 | Aug. 31, 2017 | Jul. 31, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2017 | May 31, 2017 | Apr. 30, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Feb. 28, 2017 | Jan. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | Nov. 30, 2016 | Oct. 31, 2016 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Aug. 31, 2016 | Jul. 31, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 | May 31, 2016 | Apr. 30, 2016 | Mar. 31, 2016 | Feb. 29, 2016 | Jan. 31, 2016 | Mar. 31, 2019 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Sep. 30, 2018 | Jun. 30, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | $ 0.57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shares granted | 156,718 | 143,057 | 127,087 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.18 | ||||||||||||
Number of shares repurchased | 31,326 | 42,089 | 49,405 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event | 2015 Plan | Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Grant Date Price $38.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shares granted | 139,112 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per share | $ 46.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event | 2015 Plan | Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Three year vesting | Grant Date Price $38.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shares granted | 78,276 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting period | 3 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event | 2015 Plan | Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | TSR Targets | Grant Date Price $38.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shares granted | 60,836 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting period | 4 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event | 2015 Plan | Restricted stock and performance-based stock units | Accelerated TSR Targets | Grant Date Price $38.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting period | 3 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event | Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shares repurchased | 20,345 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Payable, October 2018 | Subsequent Event | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends payable, date to be paid | Jan. 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends payable, date of record | Jan. 23, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Payable, November 2018 | Subsequent Event | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends payable, date to be paid | Feb. 28, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends payable, date of record | Feb. 20, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Payable, December 2018 28, 2018 | Subsequent Event | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends payable, date to be paid | Mar. 29, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends payable, date of record | Mar. 21, 2019 |
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUA_2
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Valuation and qualifying accounts | |||
Balance at beginning of period | $ 3,235 | $ 3,441 | $ 3,023 |
(Recovered) charged to costs and expenses | 86 | (206) | 457 |
Deductions | (39) | ||
Balance at end of period | 3,321 | 3,235 | 3,441 |
Loan loss reserves | |||
Valuation and qualifying accounts | |||
Balance at beginning of period | 2,255 | 2,315 | 2,190 |
(Recovered) charged to costs and expenses | 192 | (60) | 125 |
Balance at end of period | 2,447 | 2,255 | 2,315 |
Other notes receivable allowance | |||
Valuation and qualifying accounts | |||
Balance at beginning of period | 166 | 166 | |
(Recovered) charged to costs and expenses | (38) | 166 | |
Balance at end of period | 128 | 166 | 166 |
Straight-line rent receivable allowance | |||
Valuation and qualifying accounts | |||
Balance at beginning of period | 814 | 960 | 833 |
(Recovered) charged to costs and expenses | (68) | (146) | 166 |
Deductions | (39) | ||
Balance at end of period | $ 746 | $ 814 | $ 960 |
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND _2
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION - By Property (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | Dec. 31, 2015 |
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | $ 125,691 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,205,553 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 90,212 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 125,691 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,295,765 | |||
Total | 1,421,456 | $ 1,392,122 | $ 1,301,563 | $ 1,198,686 |
Accum Deprec | 314,875 | $ 306,033 | $ 275,861 | $ 251,265 |
SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 49,593 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 463,714 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 51,877 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 49,593 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 515,591 | |||
Total | 565,184 | |||
Accum Deprec | 172,196 | |||
ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 70,772 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 695,763 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 37,486 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 70,772 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 733,249 | |||
Total | 804,021 | |||
Accum Deprec | 142,002 | |||
Other School and Land | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,908 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,308 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 849 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,908 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,157 | |||
Total | 11,065 | |||
Accum Deprec | 677 | |||
School | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,965 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,308 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 849 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,965 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,157 | |||
Total | 10,122 | |||
Accum Deprec | 677 | |||
Land | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 943 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 943 | |||
Total | 943 | |||
Properties under Development | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,418 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 38,768 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,418 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 38,768 | |||
Total | 41,186 | |||
134 Alamogordo, NM | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 210 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,593 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 641 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 210 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,234 | |||
Total | 3,444 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,408 | |||
218 Albuquerque, NM | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,696 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,891 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 530 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,696 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 4,421 | |||
Total | 6,117 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,841 | |||
219 Albuquerque, NM | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,950 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,910 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 207 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,950 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,117 | |||
Total | 11,067 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,670 | |||
220 Albuquerque, NM | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,463 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,647 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 9 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,463 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,656 | |||
Total | 10,119 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,062 | |||
042 Altoona, IA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 105 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,309 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 444 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 105 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,753 | |||
Total | 2,858 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,920 | |||
252 Amarillo, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 844 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 7,925 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 844 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,925 | |||
Total | 8,769 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,871 | |||
214 Aransas Pass, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 154 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,276 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 589 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 154 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,865 | |||
Total | 2,019 | |||
Accum Deprec | 888 | |||
247 Arlington, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,016 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,649 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,016 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,649 | |||
Total | 14,665 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,801 | |||
221 Beaumont, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 370 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,141 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 106 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 370 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,247 | |||
Total | 1,617 | |||
Accum Deprec | 541 | |||
213 Beeville, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 186 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,197 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 70 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 186 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,267 | |||
Total | 1,453 | |||
Accum Deprec | 493 | |||
007 Bradenton, FL | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 330 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,720 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 160 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 330 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,880 | |||
Total | 3,210 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,112 | |||
256 Brownwood, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 164 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,336 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 164 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,336 | |||
Total | 6,500 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,354 | |||
043 Carroll, IA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 47 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,033 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 213 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 47 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,246 | |||
Total | 1,293 | |||
Accum Deprec | 867 | |||
177 Chesapeake, VA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 388 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,469 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 2,777 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 388 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,246 | |||
Total | 6,634 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,395 | |||
257 Cincinnati, OH | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,890 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 25,110 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,890 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 25,110 | |||
Total | 27,000 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,694 | |||
125 Clovis, NM | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 561 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,539 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 307 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 561 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,846 | |||
Total | 6,407 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,588 | |||
129 Clovis, NM | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 598 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,902 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 59 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 598 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,961 | |||
Total | 6,559 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,662 | |||
268 Coldspring, KY | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,050 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 21,496 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,050 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 21,496 | |||
Total | 23,546 | |||
Accum Deprec | 4,091 | |||
253 Colton, CA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,342 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 15,158 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,342 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 15,158 | |||
Total | 17,500 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,082 | |||
211 Commerce City, CO | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 236 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,217 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 167 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 236 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,384 | |||
Total | 3,620 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,529 | |||
212 Commerce City, CO | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 161 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,160 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 95 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 161 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,255 | |||
Total | 2,416 | |||
Accum Deprec | 999 | |||
246 Crowley, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,247 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,276 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,247 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,276 | |||
Total | 16,523 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,841 | |||
235 Daleville, VA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 279 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,382 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 279 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,382 | |||
Total | 8,661 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,421 | |||
258 Dayton, OH | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 373 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 26,627 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 373 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 26,627 | |||
Total | 27,000 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,945 | |||
168 Des Moines, IA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 115 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,096 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,433 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 115 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,529 | |||
Total | 3,644 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,114 | |||
196 Dresden, TN | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 31 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,529 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,073 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 31 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,602 | |||
Total | 2,633 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,095 | |||
298 Forth Worth, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,785 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,546 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,785 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,546 | |||
Total | 10,331 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,341 | |||
026 Gardendale, AL | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,550 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 2,084 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,634 | |||
Total | 9,734 | |||
Accum Deprec | 5,863 | |||
185 Gardner, KS | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 896 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 4,478 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 4,150 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 896 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,628 | |||
Total | 9,524 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,773 | |||
248 Granbury, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 836 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,693 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 836 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,693 | |||
Total | 7,529 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,473 | |||
044 Granger, IA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 62 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,356 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 221 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 62 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,577 | |||
Total | 1,639 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,072 | |||
205 Grapevine, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 431 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,449 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 188 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 431 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,637 | |||
Total | 2,068 | |||
Accum Deprec | 912 | |||
172 Griffin, GA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 500 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,900 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 500 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,900 | |||
Total | 3,400 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,711 | |||
250 Hewitt, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,780 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,220 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 99 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,780 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,319 | |||
Total | 10,099 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,815 | |||
194 Holyoke, CO | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 211 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,513 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 283 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 211 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,796 | |||
Total | 2,007 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,085 | |||
051 Houston, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 365 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,769 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,598 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 365 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,367 | |||
Total | 5,732 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,508 | |||
054 Houston, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 202 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 4,458 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,426 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 202 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,884 | |||
Total | 6,086 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,996 | |||
055 Houston, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 202 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 4,458 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,359 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 202 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,817 | |||
Total | 6,019 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,880 | |||
045 Jefferson, IA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 86 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,883 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 296 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 86 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,179 | |||
Total | 2,265 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,464 | |||
008 Lecanto, FL | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 351 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,665 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 2,737 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 351 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,402 | |||
Total | 5,753 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,735 | |||
300 Mansfield, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,890 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,110 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,890 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,110 | |||
Total | 16,000 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,424 | |||
053 Mesa, AZ | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 305 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,909 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,876 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 305 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,785 | |||
Total | 9,090 | |||
Accum Deprec | 5,632 | |||
226 Mesa, AZ | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,095 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,330 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 4,673 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,095 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,003 | |||
Total | 8,098 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,407 | |||
242 Mission, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,111 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 16,602 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,111 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 16,602 | |||
Total | 17,713 | |||
Accum Deprec | 4,014 | |||
115 Nacogdoches, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,738 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 168 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,906 | |||
Total | 2,006 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,164 | |||
233 Nacogdoches, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 394 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,456 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 268 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 394 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,724 | |||
Total | 8,118 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,077 | |||
249 Nacogdoches, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,015 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,109 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,015 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,109 | |||
Total | 12,124 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,451 | |||
245 Newberry, SC | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 439 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 4,639 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 608 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 439 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,247 | |||
Total | 5,686 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,744 | |||
244 Newberry, SC | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 919 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,454 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 131 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 919 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,585 | |||
Total | 6,504 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,634 | |||
046 Norwalk, IA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 47 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,033 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 239 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 47 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,272 | |||
Total | 1,319 | |||
Accum Deprec | 895 | |||
176 Olathe, KS | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 520 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,872 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 313 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 520 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,185 | |||
Total | 2,705 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,393 | |||
251 Pasadena, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,155 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,345 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 522 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,155 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,867 | |||
Total | 16,022 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,012 | |||
210 Phoenix, AZ | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 334 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,383 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 456 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 334 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,839 | |||
Total | 4,173 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,844 | |||
193 Phoenix, AZ | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 300 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,703 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 92 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 300 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,795 | |||
Total | 10,095 | |||
Accum Deprec | 5,601 | |||
047 Polk City, IA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 63 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,376 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 153 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 63 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,529 | |||
Total | 1,592 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,046 | |||
094 Portland, OR | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,925 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 3,152 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,077 | |||
Total | 5,177 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,166 | |||
254 Red Oak, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,427 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 17,173 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,427 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 17,173 | |||
Total | 18,600 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,479 | |||
124 Richland Hills, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 144 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,656 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 427 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 144 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,083 | |||
Total | 2,227 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,155 | |||
197 Ripley, TN | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 20 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 985 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,638 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 20 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,623 | |||
Total | 2,643 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,101 | |||
133 Roswell, NM | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 568 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,235 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,396 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 568 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,631 | |||
Total | 7,199 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,782 | |||
081 Sacramento, CA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 220 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,929 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,481 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 220 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 4,410 | |||
Total | 4,630 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,330 | |||
085 Salina, KS | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,153 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 628 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,781 | |||
Total | 1,881 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,201 | |||
281 Slinger, WI | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 464 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,482 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 464 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,482 | |||
Total | 13,946 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,040 | |||
234 St. Petersburg, FL | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,070 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,930 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 500 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,070 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,430 | |||
Total | 9,500 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,084 | |||
243 Stephenville TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 670 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 10,117 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 500 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 670 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 10,617 | |||
Total | 11,287 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,627 | |||
225 Tacoma, WA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 723 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,401 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 901 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 723 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,302 | |||
Total | 8,025 | |||
Accum Deprec | 3,105 | |||
178 Tappahannock, VA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 375 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,327 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 397 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 375 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,724 | |||
Total | 2,099 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,487 | |||
270 Trinity, FL | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,653 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,748 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,653 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,748 | |||
Total | 14,401 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,131 | |||
192 Tucson, AZ | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 276 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,924 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 112 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 276 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,036 | |||
Total | 9,312 | |||
Accum Deprec | 5,162 | |||
299 Weatherford, TX | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 836 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,902 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 836 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,902 | |||
Total | 12,738 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,726 | |||
236 Wytheville, VA | SNF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 647 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,167 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 647 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,167 | |||
Total | 12,814 | |||
Accum Deprec | 4,370 | |||
077 Ada, OK | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,650 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,650 | |||
Total | 1,750 | |||
Accum Deprec | 926 | |||
105 Arvada, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,810 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 6,960 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,770 | |||
Total | 9,870 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,955 | |||
304 Athens, GA | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,056 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,326 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,056 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,326 | |||
Total | 14,382 | |||
Accum Deprec | 948 | |||
063 Athens, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 96 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,510 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 104 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 96 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,614 | |||
Total | 1,710 | |||
Accum Deprec | 929 | |||
269 Aurora, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 850 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,583 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 850 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,583 | |||
Total | 9,433 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,548 | |||
260 Aurora, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 831 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 10,071 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 831 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 10,071 | |||
Total | 10,902 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,819 | |||
203 Bakersfield, CA | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 834 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,986 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 812 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 834 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,798 | |||
Total | 13,632 | |||
Accum Deprec | 6,115 | |||
117 Beatrice, NE | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,173 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 183 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,356 | |||
Total | 2,456 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,211 | |||
277 Burr Ridge, IL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,400 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,102 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,400 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,102 | |||
Total | 12,502 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,229 | |||
278 Castle Rock, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 759 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,041 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 759 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,041 | |||
Total | 9,800 | |||
Accum Deprec | 823 | |||
160 Central, SC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,321 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,321 | |||
Total | 2,421 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,050 | |||
263 Chatham, NJ | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 5,365 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 36,399 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 5,365 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 36,399 | |||
Total | 41,764 | |||
Accum Deprec | 6,297 | |||
307 Clovis, CA | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,542 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 19,126 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,542 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 19,126 | |||
Total | 21,668 | |||
Accum Deprec | 824 | |||
308 Clovis, CA | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 3,054 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,172 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 3,054 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,172 | |||
Total | 17,226 | |||
Accum Deprec | 587 | |||
279 Corpus Christi, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 880 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,440 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 880 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,440 | |||
Total | 12,320 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,166 | |||
292 De Forest, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 485 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,568 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 8 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 485 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,576 | |||
Total | 6,061 | |||
Accum Deprec | 594 | |||
057 Dodge City, KS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 84 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,666 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 4 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 84 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,670 | |||
Total | 1,754 | |||
Accum Deprec | 994 | |||
083 Durant, OK | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,769 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,769 | |||
Total | 1,869 | |||
Accum Deprec | 977 | |||
107 Edmond, OK | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,365 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 526 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,891 | |||
Total | 1,991 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,024 | |||
163 Ft. Collins, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,961 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 3,405 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,366 | |||
Total | 6,466 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,258 | |||
170 Ft. Collins, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,400 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 4,622 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,022 | |||
Total | 8,122 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,510 | |||
132 Ft. Meyers, FL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,728 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 9 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,737 | |||
Total | 2,837 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,440 | |||
229 Ft. Worth, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 333 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 4,385 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,028 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 333 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,413 | |||
Total | 5,746 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,916 | |||
315 Ft. Worth, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,534 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,099 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,534 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,099 | |||
Total | 12,633 | |||
Accum Deprec | 158 | |||
100 Fremont ,OH | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,435 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 106 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,541 | |||
Total | 2,641 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,363 | |||
267 Frisco, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,000 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,154 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,000 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,154 | |||
Total | 6,154 | |||
Accum Deprec | 977 | |||
314 Frisco, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,216 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 10,417 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,216 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 10,417 | |||
Total | 12,633 | |||
Accum Deprec | 152 | |||
296 Glenview, IL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,800 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,248 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,800 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,248 | |||
Total | 17,048 | |||
Accum Deprec | 568 | |||
167 Goldsboro, NC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,385 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,386 | |||
Total | 2,486 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,006 | |||
056 Great Bend, KS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 80 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,570 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 21 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 80 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,591 | |||
Total | 1,671 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,052 | |||
102 Greeley, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,310 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 270 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,580 | |||
Total | 2,680 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,395 | |||
284 Green Bay, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,660 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 19,079 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 356 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,660 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 19,435 | |||
Total | 21,095 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,015 | |||
164 Greenville, NC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,478 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 2 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,480 | |||
Total | 2,580 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,175 | |||
062 Greenville, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 42 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,565 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 84 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 42 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,649 | |||
Total | 1,691 | |||
Accum Deprec | 947 | |||
161 Greenwood, SC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,638 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,638 | |||
Total | 2,738 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,278 | |||
241 Gulf Breeze, FL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 720 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,780 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 261 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 720 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 4,041 | |||
Total | 4,761 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,093 | |||
295 Jacksonville, FL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,389 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,756 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 39 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,389 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,795 | |||
Total | 14,184 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,098 | |||
066 Jacksonville, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,900 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 77 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,977 | |||
Total | 2,077 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,137 | |||
310 Kansas City, MO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,072 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 15,552 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,072 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 15,552 | |||
Total | 16,624 | |||
Accum Deprec | 448 | |||
285 Kenosha, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 936 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,361 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 165 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 936 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,526 | |||
Total | 13,462 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,155 | |||
255 Littleton, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,882 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,248 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,882 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,248 | |||
Total | 10,130 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,548 | |||
268 Littleton, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,200 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,688 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,200 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,688 | |||
Total | 9,888 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,690 | |||
148 Longmont, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,640 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,640 | |||
Total | 2,740 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,378 | |||
060 Longview, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 38 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,568 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 127 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 38 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,695 | |||
Total | 1,733 | |||
Accum Deprec | 978 | |||
261 Louisville, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 911 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,703 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 911 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,703 | |||
Total | 12,614 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,069 | |||
301 Louisville, KY | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,021 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,157 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,021 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,157 | |||
Total | 14,178 | |||
Accum Deprec | 937 | |||
114 Loveland, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,865 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 270 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,135 | |||
Total | 3,235 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,681 | |||
068 Lufkin, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,950 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 94 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,044 | |||
Total | 2,144 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,167 | |||
061 Marshall, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 38 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,568 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 534 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 38 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,102 | |||
Total | 2,140 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,235 | |||
293 McHenry, IL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,289 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 28,976 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 123 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,289 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 29,099 | |||
Total | 30,388 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,978 | |||
058 McPherson, KS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 79 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,571 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 4 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 79 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,575 | |||
Total | 1,654 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,041 | |||
316 Medford, OR | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 750 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,650 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 750 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,650 | |||
Total | 14,400 | |||
Accum Deprec | 144 | |||
239 Merritt Island, FL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 550 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,150 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 100 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 550 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,250 | |||
Total | 8,800 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,107 | |||
104 Millville, NJ | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,825 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 708 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,533 | |||
Total | 3,633 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,631 | |||
286 Milwaukee, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 818 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,014 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 56 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 818 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,070 | |||
Total | 8,888 | |||
Accum Deprec | 861 | |||
231 Monroeville, PA | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 526 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,334 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 435 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 526 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,769 | |||
Total | 6,295 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,714 | |||
280 Merrells Inlet, SC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,490 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,185 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,490 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 14,185 | |||
Total | 16,675 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,207 | |||
294 Murrieta, CA | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,022 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,136 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,022 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,136 | |||
Total | 13,158 | |||
Accum Deprec | 993 | |||
289 Neenah, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 694 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 20,839 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 212 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 694 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 21,051 | |||
Total | 21,745 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,028 | |||
166 New Bern, NC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,427 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,428 | |||
Total | 2,528 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,044 | |||
118 Newark, OH | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,435 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 275 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,710 | |||
Total | 2,810 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,351 | |||
143 Niceville, FL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,680 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,680 | |||
Total | 2,780 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,399 | |||
095 Norfolk, NE | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,123 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 165 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,288 | |||
Total | 2,388 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,191 | |||
290 Oshkosh, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,525 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,192 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 108 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,525 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,300 | |||
Total | 10,825 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,930 | |||
291 Oshkosh, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 475 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,364 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 40 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 475 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,404 | |||
Total | 7,879 | |||
Accum Deprec | 776 | |||
302 Overland Park, KS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,951 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,882 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 259 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,951 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,141 | |||
Total | 14,092 | |||
Accum Deprec | 958 | |||
232 Pittsburgh, PA | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 470 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,615 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 333 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 470 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,948 | |||
Total | 3,418 | |||
Accum Deprec | 972 | |||
165 Rocky Mount, NC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,494 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,495 | |||
Total | 2,595 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,103 | |||
059 Salina, KS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 79 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,571 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 4 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 79 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,575 | |||
Total | 1,654 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,041 | |||
084 San Antonio, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,900 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,900 | |||
Total | 2,000 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,048 | |||
092 San Antonio, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,055 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,055 | |||
Total | 2,155 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,128 | |||
288 Sheboygan, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,168 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,382 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 180 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,168 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 5,562 | |||
Total | 6,730 | |||
Accum Deprec | 660 | |||
149 Shelby, NC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,805 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 2 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,807 | |||
Total | 2,907 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,464 | |||
312 Spartanburg, SC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 254 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,906 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,035 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 254 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 10,941 | |||
Total | 11,195 | |||
Accum Deprec | 407 | |||
150 Spring Hill, FL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,650 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,650 | |||
Total | 2,750 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,383 | |||
103 Springfield, OH | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,035 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 270 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,305 | |||
Total | 2,405 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,244 | |||
162 Sumter, SC | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,351 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,351 | |||
Total | 2,451 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,091 | |||
140 Tallahassee, FL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,075 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,075 | |||
Total | 3,175 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,608 | |||
098 Tiffin, OH | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,435 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 94 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,529 | |||
Total | 2,629 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,346 | |||
282 Tinley Park, IL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 702 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,481 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 702 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,481 | |||
Total | 12,183 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,076 | |||
088 Troy, OH | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,435 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 593 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,028 | |||
Total | 3,128 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,548 | |||
080 Tulsa, OK | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 200 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,650 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 200 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,650 | |||
Total | 1,850 | |||
Accum Deprec | 919 | |||
093 Tulsa, OK | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,395 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,395 | |||
Total | 2,495 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,311 | |||
238 Tupelo, MS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,170 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,230 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 30 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,170 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,260 | |||
Total | 9,430 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,203 | |||
075 Tyler, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,800 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,800 | |||
Total | 1,900 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,008 | |||
202 Vacaville, CA | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,662 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 11,634 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 1,141 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,662 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 12,775 | |||
Total | 14,437 | |||
Accum Deprec | 6,098 | |||
091 Waco, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,235 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,235 | |||
Total | 2,335 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,225 | |||
096 Wahoo, NE | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,318 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 119 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,437 | |||
Total | 2,537 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,293 | |||
108 Watauga, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,668 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,668 | |||
Total | 1,768 | |||
Accum Deprec | 908 | |||
287 Waukesha, WI | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 992 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 15,183 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 187 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 992 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 15,370 | |||
Total | 16,362 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,435 | |||
109 Weatherford, OK | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,669 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 592 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,261 | |||
Total | 2,361 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,222 | |||
309 West Chester, OH | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 2,355 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,553 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 2,355 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,553 | |||
Total | 15,908 | |||
Accum Deprec | 587 | |||
276 Westminster, CO | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,425 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,575 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,425 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,575 | |||
Total | 11,000 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,480 | |||
110 Wheelersburg, OH | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 29 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,435 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 239 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 29 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,674 | |||
Total | 2,703 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,344 | |||
303 Wichita, KS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,422 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,957 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 221 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,422 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 10,178 | |||
Total | 11,600 | |||
Accum Deprec | 828 | |||
259 Wichita, KS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 730 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 9,682 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 730 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 9,682 | |||
Total | 10,412 | |||
Accum Deprec | 2,057 | |||
283 Wichita, KS | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 624 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,846 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 624 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,846 | |||
Total | 14,470 | |||
Accum Deprec | 837 | |||
076 Wichita Falls, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,850 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 1,850 | |||
Total | 1,950 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,036 | |||
120 Wichita Falls, TX | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,750 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 131 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,881 | |||
Total | 2,981 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,526 | |||
265 Williamstown, NJ | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 711 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,637 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 711 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 6,637 | |||
Total | 7,348 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,287 | |||
264 Williamstown, NJ | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 711 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,649 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 711 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,649 | |||
Total | 9,360 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,516 | |||
099 York, NE | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,318 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 78 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 100 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 2,396 | |||
Total | 2,496 | |||
Accum Deprec | 1,289 | |||
297 Las Vegas, NV | School | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,965 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 7,308 | |||
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to acquisition | 849 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,965 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 8,157 | |||
Total | 10,122 | |||
Accum Deprec | 677 | |||
271 Howell, MI | Land | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 420 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 420 | |||
Total | 420 | |||
272 Milford, MI | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 450 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 450 | |||
Total | 450 | |||
275 Yale, MI | Land | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 73 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 73 | |||
Total | 73 | |||
305 Union, KY | Properties under Development | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 858 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 19,057 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 858 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 19,057 | |||
Total | 19,915 | |||
311 Cedarburg, WI | Properties under Development | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 924 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 15,741 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 924 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 15,741 | |||
Total | 16,665 | |||
306 Oaklawn, IL | ALF | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 1,591 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,772 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 1,591 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 13,772 | |||
Total | 15,363 | |||
Accum Deprec | 281 | |||
313 Medford, OR | Properties under Development | ||||
Initial Cost to Company | ||||
Land | 636 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,970 | |||
Gross Amount at Which Carried As of Year End | ||||
Land | 636 | |||
Buildings and Improvements | 3,970 | |||
Total | $ 4,606 |
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND _3
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION - Additional Information (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($) | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Aggregate cost basis for Federal income tax purposes | $ 1,435,334 |
Computer Equipment | Minimum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 3 years |
Computer Equipment | Maximum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 5 years |
Furniture and Fixtures | Minimum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 5 years |
Furniture and Fixtures | Maximum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 15 years |
Building | Minimum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 35 years |
Building | Maximum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 50 years |
Site Improvements | Minimum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 10 years |
Site Improvements | Maximum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 15 years |
Building Improvements | Minimum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 10 years |
Building Improvements | Maximum | |
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
Useful life | 20 years |
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND _4
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION - Summary (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Carrying cost | |||
Balance at beginning of period | $ 1,392,122 | $ 1,301,563 | $ 1,198,686 |
Acquisitions | 40,408 | 82,405 | 74,923 |
Improvements | 38,528 | 25,800 | 49,134 |
Capitalized interest | 1,248 | 908 | 1,408 |
Other non-cash items (See Note 4) | 2,460 | ||
Cost of real estate sold | (50,850) | (18,554) | (24,282) |
Impairment on real estate for sale | (766) | ||
Ending balance | 1,421,456 | 1,392,122 | 1,301,563 |
Accumulated depreciation | |||
Balance at beginning of period | 306,033 | 275,861 | 251,265 |
Depreciation expense | 37,416 | 37,492 | 35,809 |
Cost of real estate sold | (28,574) | (7,320) | (11,213) |
Ending balance | $ 314,875 | $ 306,033 | $ 275,861 |
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON_2
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE - Summary (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | |||
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)itemproperty | Dec. 31, 2017USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2016USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2015USD ($) | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | ||||
Number of properties | property | 22 | |||
Number of beds/units | item | 2,892 | |||
Balloon Amount | $ 215,748 | |||
Current Monthly Debt Service | 1,963 | |||
Face amount of originated mortgages | 247,253 | |||
Carrying Amount of Mortgages | 242,939 | $ 223,907 | $ 229,801 | $ 217,529 |
Principal Amount of Loans Subject to Delinquent Principal or Interest | $ 0 | |||
Michigan | Mortgage Loans on Real Estate Maturing in 2043 | ||||
Mortgage loans on real estate | ||||
Number of properties | property | 15 | |||
Number of beds/units | item | 2,029 | |||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 9.71% | |||
Balloon Amount | $ 160,855 | |||
Current Monthly Debt Service | 1,500 | |||
Face amount of originated mortgages | 187,855 | |||
Carrying Amount of Mortgages | $ 184,160 | |||
Michigan | Mortgage Loans on Real Estate Maturing in 2045 | Property with 501 Beds/Units | ||||
Mortgage loans on real estate | ||||
Number of properties | property | 4 | |||
Number of beds/units | item | 501 | |||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 9.22% | |||
Balloon Amount | $ 29,487 | |||
Current Monthly Debt Service | 257 | |||
Face amount of originated mortgages | 33,317 | |||
Carrying Amount of Mortgages | $ 32,984 | |||
Michigan | Mortgage Loans on Real Estate Maturing in 2045 | Property with 157 Beds/Units | ||||
Mortgage loans on real estate | ||||
Number of properties | property | 1 | |||
Number of beds/units | item | 157 | |||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 9.41% | |||
Balloon Amount | $ 14,325 | |||
Current Monthly Debt Service | 117 | |||
Face amount of originated mortgages | 15,000 | |||
Carrying Amount of Mortgages | $ 14,825 | |||
Michigan | Mortgage Loans On Real Estate Maturing In 2020 | ||||
Mortgage loans on real estate | ||||
Number of properties | property | 2 | |||
Number of beds/units | item | 205 | |||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 9.41% | |||
Balloon Amount | $ 11,081 | |||
Current Monthly Debt Service | 89 | |||
Face amount of originated mortgages | 11,081 | |||
Carrying Amount of Mortgages | 10,970 | |||
Principal Amount of Loans Subject to Delinquent Principal or Interest | $ 0 | |||
Mortgage Loans | ||||
Mortgage loans on real estate | ||||
General amortization schedule of mortgage loans | 30 years | |||
Mortgage Loans | Minimum | ||||
Mortgage loans on real estate | ||||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 9.20% | |||
General amortization schedule of mortgage loans | 30 years | |||
Mortgage Loans | Maximum | ||||
Mortgage loans on real estate | ||||
Interest rate (as a percent) | 9.70% |
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON_3
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE - Number of Loans (Details) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2018USD ($)loan | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 247,253 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 500,000 and 2,000,000 | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Number of Loans | loan | 0 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 500,000 and 2,000,000 | Minimum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 500 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 500,000 and 2,000,000 | Maximum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 2,000 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 2,001,000 and 3,000,000 | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Number of Loans | loan | 0 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 2,001,000 and 3,000,000 | Minimum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 2,001 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 2,001,000 and 3,000,000 | Maximum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 3,000 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 3,001,000 and 4,000,000 | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Number of Loans | loan | 0 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 3,001,000 and 4,000,000 | Minimum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 3,001 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 3,001,000 and 4,000,000 | Maximum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 4,000 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 4,001,000 and 5,000,000 | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Number of Loans | loan | 0 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 4,001,000 and 5,000,000 | Minimum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 4,001 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 4,001,000 and 5,000,000 | Maximum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 5,000 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 5,001,000 and 6,000,000 | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Number of Loans | loan | 0 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 5,001,000 and 6,000,000 | Minimum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 5,001 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 5,001,000 and 6,000,000 | Maximum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 6,000 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 6,001,000 and 7,000,000 | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Number of Loans | loan | 0 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 6,001,000 and 7,000,000 | Minimum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 6,001 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans between 6,001,000 and 7,000,000 | Maximum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 7,000 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans over 7,000,000 | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Number of Loans | loan | 4 |
First-lien mortgage loans | Mortgage Loans over 7,000,000 | Minimum | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |
Original loan amounts | $ 7,001 |
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON_4
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE - Rollforward (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 12 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Mortgage loans on real estate | |||
Balance at the beginning of the period | $ 223,907 | $ 229,801 | $ 217,529 |
New mortgage loans | 14,525 | 13,250 | |
Other additions | 6,839 | 11,913 | 7,435 |
Land conveyance | (4) | ||
Amortization of mortgage premium | (4) | (17,863) | (10) |
Collections of principal | (2,136) | (8,278) | |
Foreclosures | 60 | ||
Loan loss reserve | (192) | (125) | |
Balance at the end of the period | $ 242,939 | $ 223,907 | $ 229,801 |