UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant[x]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant[ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[x] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a -12
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
_________________________________________
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[x] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |
(5) | Total fee paid: | |
[ ] | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
[ ] | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |
(3) | Filing Party: | |
(4) | Date Filed: | |
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS, INC. |
1100 Quail Street, Suite 100 |
Newport Beach, CA 92660 |
(866) 257-6675 |
April 16, 2010
Dear Shareholders:
I am pleased to enclose the proxy statement for our Special Meeting of shareholders to be held on June 10, 2010. We are asking shareholders to approve the vend-out of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. (“SCI”) to its president and founder Perry Law (the “Purchaser”) for an estimated $1,021,757. $821,756 of the Purchase Price shall be paid and satisfied by off -setting against the Purchase Price, Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc.’s (the “Vendor”) indebtedness to the Purchaser pursuant to a Loan, including all accrued and unpaid interest there under up to the Closing Date. $1.00 of the Purchase Price shall be paid by the Purchaser transferring the Smart-Tek Shares in the Purchasers possession to the Vendor; and $200,000 of the Purchase Price shall be paid and satisfied by the Purchaser for all amounts owed pursuant to a litigation settlement. The Purchaser will also cancel any outstanding options in his possession.
The date, time, place, and agenda for the Special Meeting are set forth in the accompanying notice of Special Meeting. The accompanying proxy statement contains important information about the proposals to be submitted for a vote at the Special Meeting, including approval of the sale of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc.
The Company's board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR all the proposals to be submitted for a vote at the Special Meeting
I hope you will be able to attend the Meeting. However, whether or not you plan to attend the Meeting, we request that you vote with the enclosed proxy card.
If you should have any questions in regard to any of the above-mentioned proposals, please do not hesitate to call our Stockholder Relations Department or me at (866) 257-6675.
Sincerely yours,
/S/ Brian Bonar
____________
Brian Bonar
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Whether or not you expect to attend in person, we urge you to vote your shares by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card at your earliest convenience. This will ensure the presence of a quorum at the meeting. Promptly voting your shares will save the Company the expenses and extra work of additional solicitation. An addressed envelope is enclosed if you wish to vote your shares by mail. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your stock at the meeting if you desire to do so, as your vote by proxy is revocable at your option.
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS, INC. |
1100 Quail Street, Suite 100 |
Newport Beach, CA 92660 |
(866) 257-6675 |
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 10, 2010
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of shareholders (the “Special Meeting”) of Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation, will be held on June 10, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 11838 Bernardo Plaza Ct, Suite 240, San Diego, CA 92128. At our Special Meeting we will ask you to:
1. | Approve the vend-out of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. to its president and founder Perry Law. | |
2. | Approve the Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. 2010 Stock Compensation Plan. | |
3. | Change from a fiscal June year-end to a calendar December year end. | |
4. | Transact any other business that may properly come before the Special Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposals 1, 2 and 3 and that you allow our representatives to vote the shares represented by your proxy as recommended by our Board of Directors.
Pursuant to our bylaws, our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 16, 2010, as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining those shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock is required in order to approve the vend-out of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of our shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the Record Date that are represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is required in order to approve the proposal to authorize the adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary. Each of these proposals is more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
/s/Brian Bonar
__________________
Chief Executive Officer
April 16, 2010
Newport Beach, California
A FORM OF PROXY IS ENCLOSED. YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. THEREFORE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. YOUR PROXY MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE VOTE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING BY FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY YOUR PROXY WILL BE VOTED ACCORDING TO YOUR SPECIFIED RESPONSE. PROPERLY EXECUTED PROXIES THAT DO NOT CONTAIN VOTING INSTRUCTIONS WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSALS AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY. IF YOU FAIL TO RETURN A PROPERLY EXECUTED PROXY CARD OR TO VOTE IN PERSON AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, THE EFFECT WILL BE A VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSALS AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This proxy statement and the form of proxy were first mailed to stockholders on or about Ma y 10, 2010.
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS, INC.
1100 Quail Street, Suite 100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(866) 257-6675
PROXY STATEMENT
Special Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held June 10, 2010
10:00 A.M.
The enclosed Proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”) of Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) for use at our special meeting of stockholders (“Special Meeting”) to be held at 11838 Bernardo Plaza Ct, Suite 240, San Diego, CA. It is anticipated that this Proxy Statement will be mailed to our stockholders on or about May 10, 2010. References to the “Company,” “us,” “we,” or “our,” refer to Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc.
The Special Meeting is for the purpose of considering and voting upon:
1. | Approve the vend-out of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. to its president and founder Perry Law. | |
2. | Approve the Smart-Tek Solutions 2010 Stock Compensation Plan. | |
3. | Change from a fiscal June year-end to a calendar December year end. | |
4. | Transact any other business that may properly come before the Special Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
The Board of Directors is not aware of any other business to come before the Special Meeting, and
unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” these proposals.
1
SUMMARY TERM SHEET
The following summary, together with the question and answer section, provides an overview of the proposed vend-out of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. to its president and founder Perry Law. Smart-Tek Communications Inc. (as defined below) discussed in this Proxy Statement and the attached appendices. This summary also contains cross-references to the more detailed discussions elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand fully the proposed vend-out of our owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. and for a more complete description of the terms thereto, you should carefully read this entire Proxy Statement, including the information incorporated by reference, and the attached appendices in their entirety.
Proposal No. 1: Vend-out of our Smart-Tek Communications business:
General (see page 14)
We have entered into the Share Purchase Agreement (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) with Perry Law (the “Purchaser”) whereby we will sell to the Purchaser the issued and outstanding shares of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. (“SCI”). SCI is in the business of design, sale, installation and service of security technology with electronic hardware and software products. Its projects range from residential and commercial developments to system upgrades and monitoring contracts. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the SCI Business had revenues of $3.3 million or 100% of our total revenue and net loss of $96K or 100% of our loss. At June 30, 2009, the SCI Business had total assets of $1million or 100% of our total assets. As of six months year to date December 31, 2009, our SCI Business had revenues of $3,035,056 or 60.6% of total revenue and net income of $246,265 or 69.3% of total net income. At December 31, 2009, the SCI Business had total assets of $2.1million or 49.5% of our total assets and liabilities of $2.4 million or 55.7% of our total liabilities.
The Parties (see page 14)
Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc.:
The parent, Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc., currently generates revenue from its two subsidiaries:
1)SCI: generates revenue from the installation of security systems in construction projects.2) Smart-Tek Automated Services, Inc. provides financial services to small and medium-size businesses, relieving our clients from many of the day-to-day tasks that negatively impact their core business operations such as payroll processing, human resources support, workers' compensation insurance, safety programs, employee benefits, and other administrative and aftermarket services predominantly related to staffing - staff leasing, temporary staffing and co-employment. It not only provides core services but a wide selection of employee and employer benefits and aftermarket products.
Perry Law:
Perry Law is the founder of our subsidiary, Smart-Tek Communications Inc. and has been its Chief Executive officer since 1997. Mr. Law has over sixteen years experience in the security/surveillance systems industry and has played a central role in introducing and implementing technological changes in the local/regional security industry. Mr. Law has held numerous executive management positions in both private and public companies and is very active in charitable causes.
Reasons for the Vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. business (see page 14)
We believe that the vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. business and the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement are in the best interests of our shareholders. There are two main reasons for the vend-out;
2
1) Smart-Tek Communications Inc has struggled through the years to generate revenue and profit. The accumulated deficit through December 31, 2009 is ($6,957,373). This coupled with limited growth potential gives the shareholders limited value.
2) The vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. business will permit us to focus on our new line of business and provide the following anticipated benefits:
- Allow us to focus on our new business unit, and identify and develop new opportunities in that unit.
- The new business unit will provide for growth in revenue and profitability as opposed to limited growth in the SCI business.
Our Board of Directors also considered various risks when evaluating the sale of the SCI Business, which include:
- The possibility that the new business does not achieve the revenue and profit growth anticipated;
- The possibility that the proposed sale might not be completed and the effect on our business and financial position; and
- The effect of the public announcement of the proposed vend-out of the SCI business current business.
Background of the vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. business (see page 15)
Despite growth over the past ten years, SCI is experiencing a slow-down due to the current economic conditions worldwide. SCI has been affected by the downturn in construction caused by a slowdown in the real estate market plus lower prices of real estate and the fact that construction financing is much harder to obtain in today’s market. SCI’s customers range from developers, general contractors, electrical contractors, property managers, institutions and general business. In addition, SCI has struggled generating a profit in the past and expects to follow that trend in the future.
In November, 2009 our Board of Director retained an independent financial adviser to provide a fairness opinion whom delivered a written opinion as to the fairness to the holders of shares of our common stock of the vend-out of the SCI Business, from a financial point of view, considering the cash consideration (before any adjustments) to be paid to us in connection with the vend-out.
In February 2010 we reviewed a draft agreement that covered the basic terms of the proposed transaction. Throughout the following weeks, we and our advisor negotiated the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement with Perry Law and his advisor. On April 7, 2008, we finalized the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement.
On April 7, 2010, our Board of Directors convened a meeting to review the final Share Purchase Agreement and the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business.
Effect of the vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. Business (see page 15)
If our shareholders approve the vend-out of the SCI Business, we will seek to complete the vend-out. We will use the proceeds of the vend-out of the SCI Business as follows:
(a) | $821,756 of the purchase price shall be paid and satisfied by setting-off the Company’s indebtedness to the Perry Law pursuant to a Loan, including all accrued and unpaid interest there under up to the date that the vend-out close; | |
(b) | $1.00 of the purchase price shall be paid by Perry Law for transferring SCI Shares to the Company; and | |
(c) | $200,000 of the purchase price shall be paid and satisfied by Perry Law for all amounts owed to Richardson Patel LLP pursuant to the Richardson Patel Litigation. |
3
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Board of Directors (see page 16)
Our financial advisor, The EMCO/Hanover Group, delivered a written opinion to our Board of Directors as to the fairness to the holders of our common stock of the vend-out of the SCI Business, from a financial point of view, considering the cash consideration (before any adjustments) to be paid to us in connection with the vend-out of the SCI Business. The full text of the written opinion of The EMCO/Hanover Group, dated November 13, 2009, is attached asAppendix Bto this Proxy Statement and should be read in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters concerned and limitations on the review undertaken. We paid The EMCO/Hanover Group a fee for the delivery of this opinion.
THE OPINION OF THE EMCO/HANOVER GROUP IS DIRECTED TO PERRY LAW WHO WAS THE SOLE DIRECTOR AT THE TIME. THE OPINION WILL NOT BE UPDATED AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY SHAREHOLDER AS TO HOW SUCH SHAREHOLDER SHOULD VOTE ON THE PROPOSED SALE OF THE SCI BUSINESS
The Asset Purchase Agreement (see page 17)
Purchase Price
As consideration for the vend-out of the SCI business, Perry Law will pay us approximately $821,757, based on the industry average capitalization rate of revenue of 37.1% discounted further based on a discount standard of 40% as a private company plus an additional $200,000 which is to be used concurrent with closing to satisfy an outstanding settlement agreement.
The Share Purchase Agreement is attached to this Proxy Statement asAppendix A. We encourage you to read the Share Purchase Agreement carefully. Our Board of Directors has unanimously approved the Share Purchase Agreement, which is the binding legal agreement that governs the terms of the vend-out of our SCI Business.
Some of the key provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement are as follows:
Representations and Warranties
The Asset Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of the parties relating to, among other things, their authority to enter into the Share Purchase Agreement. For a more detailed description of the representations and warranties of each of the parties, please see page __.
Indemnification
The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that each party will indemnify the other for any losses incurred as a result of, among other things, breaches of representations, warranties and covenants.
Conditions to Closing
The obligations of the parties to complete the vend-out of the SCI Business are subject to certain customary closing conditions, including, among other things:
the accuracy in all material respects of all of our representations and warranties in the Share Purchase Agreement;
our performance in all material respects of all of our covenants and obligations under the Share Purchase Agreement to be performed or complied with by us prior to the completion of the proposed sale of the SCI Business;
no pending litigation
4
Termination
The Asset Purchase Agreement may be terminated if the vend-out does not occur on or before a certain date.
Related Party Transactions
During the period ended December 31, 2009, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary paid $507,866 in management salaries to its President and Vice president which included bonuses of $445,536. Consulting fees of $46,982 were also incurred during the period. Such costs have been reflected in the accompanying statement of operations. Amounts due to officers and directors were $821,756 as of December 31, 2009.
Certain Material Federal and State Income Tax Consequences (see page 19)
The vend-out contemplated by the Share Purchase Agreement will be a non- taxable transaction to us for United States federal and state income tax purposes.
Accounting Treatment (see page 19)
We will record the vend-out of the SCI Business in accordance with generally accepted principles in the United States. Upon completion of the disposition, we will recognize a small gain for financial statement purposes equal to the net proceeds (sum of purchase price less expenses of the sale) less the book value of the assets and liabilities vended
Regulatory Approvals (see page 19)
We are not aware of any federal or state regulatory requirements that must be complied with or approvals that must be obtained to complete the vend-out of the SCI Business. The filing of this Proxy Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) is not required by the Nevada Revised Statutes. If any approvals or filings are required, we will use our commercially reasonable efforts to obtain those approvals and make any required filings before completing the transactions contemplated by the Share Purchase Agreement.
No Changes in the Rights of Shareholders (see page 19)
There will be no change in the rights of our shareholders as a result of the vend-out of the SCI Business.
No Appraisal Rights (see page 19)
Our shareholders do not have appraisal rights under Nevada Revised Statutes in connection with the vend-out of the SCI Business.
Required Vote (see page 19)
The Company is seeking the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock is required in order to approve the vend-out of the SCI Business. Because the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the Special Meeting is required to approve the vend-out of the SCI Business, abstentions, broker “non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the vend-out of the SCI Business. Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be voted “FOR” the approval of the vend-out of the SCI Business.
5
Recommendation of our Board of Directors Regarding the Vend-out of the SCI Business (see page 20)
For the reasons described above, our Board of Directors has determined that the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has unanimously approved the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business and Share Purchase Agreement and unanimously recommends to our shareholders that they vote “FOR” approval of Proposal No. 1: Approval of the vend-out of the SCI Business.
Proposal No. 2: Approve the Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. 2010 Stock Compensation Plan:
Purpose (see page 24)
To provide the Company with a means of compensating selected key employees (including officers) and directors of and consultants to the Company and its subsidiaries for their services rendered in connection with the development of Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. with shares of Common Stock of the Company, accordingly, our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that our shareholders vote “FOR” approval of Proposal No. 2: The Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc. 2010 Stock Compensation Plan
Proposal No. 3: Approve the change from a fiscal June year-end to a calendar December year end.
The new line of business is required to process certain calendar year-end filings for its clients. The switch from a fiscal to a calendar year end with facilitate these filings, accordingly our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that our shareholders vote “FOR” approval of Proposal No. 3: Approve the change from a fiscal June year-end to a calendar December year end.
Purpose (see page 24)
6
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING AND RELATED PROPOSALS
Why am I receiving this Proxy Statement and proxy card?
You are receiving this Proxy Statement and proxy card because you own shares of our common stock. This Proxy Statement describes the proposals on which we would like you, as a shareholder, to vote at the Special Meeting. It also gives you information on the proposals so that you can make an informed decision.
Who can vote at the Special Meeting?
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 16, 2010 will be entitled to vote at the Special Meeting.
What is being voted on?
You are being asked to vote on the following matters:
1. | Approve the vend-out of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. to its president and founder Perry Law. | |
2. | Approve the Smart-Tek Solutions 2010 Stock Compensation Plan. |
What will happen if the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business is approved?
If the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business is approved, we will complete the vend-out subject to the satisfaction of the closing conditions set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement. We anticipate that the transaction will close shortly after the Special Meeting.
What will happen if the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business is not approved?
Management currently has a majority of the votes, so the vend-out will be approved.
Does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote on the proposals to be considered and voted upon at the Special Meeting?
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote your shares:
- “FOR” the proposed vend-out the SCI Business to Perry Law; and
- “FOR” the approval of the Smart-Tek Solutions 2010 Stock Compensation Plan.
How do I vote?
After carefully reading and considering the information contained or referred to in this Proxy Statement, including the Appendices, you may either (i) complete, sign and date your proxy card and voting instructions and return them in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or (ii) vote in person at the Special Meeting. Please vote your shares as soon as possible so that your shares will be represented at the Special Meeting.
If my shares are held in “street name” by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?
Your broker will vote your shares only if you provide instructions to your broker on how to vote. Please tell your broker how you would like him or her to vote your shares. If you do not tell your broker how to vote, your shares will not be voted by your broker.
7
Can I change my vote after I have delivered my proxy?
Yes. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the meeting by (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to Brian Bonar, our Chief Financial Officer, at 1100 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (ii) delivering a later-dated proxy, or (iii) attending the Special Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Special Meeting, in and of itself, will not constitute a revocation of a proxy. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm or a bank, you should contact your brokerage firm or bank for instructions on how to change your vote.
How many votes are required to approve the sale of the SCI Business?
The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of common stock is required in order to approve the vend-out of the SCI Business. Because the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the Special Meeting is required to approve the vent-out of the SCI Business, abstentions, broker “non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have the same effect as a vote against the vend-out of the SCI Business.
Am I entitled to appraisal rights?
No, our shareholders do not have appraisal rights under the Nevada Revised Statues in connection with the vend-out of the SCI Business.
When do you expect the vend-out of the SCI Business to be completed?
It is currently anticipated that the transactions and actions contemplated in the Share Purchase Agreement will be completed as promptly as practicable following our Special Meeting to be held on May 12, 2010.
Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?
We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. We may also engage a professional proxy solicitation firm to assist in the proxy solicitation and, if so, will pay such solicitation firm customary fees plus expenses.
Who should I call if I have any questions about the Special Meeting?
If you have any questions about the Special Meeting, you should contact Brian Bonar, our Chief Financial Officer at (866) 257-6675.
8
THE SPECIAL MEETING
Time, Date and Place; Matters to be Considered
The Special Meeting will be held on May 12, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. local time at 11838 Bernardo Plaza Ct, Suite 240, San Diego, CA 92128. At the Special Meeting, shareholders will be asked to consider and vote upon each of the proposals and conduct such other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting and any adjournment thereof.
Voting and Record Date
The Board of Directors has fixed April 16, 2010, as the record date (“Record Date”) for determining holders of shares of our common stock that are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting. Each holder of record of shares of our voting stock on the Record Date is entitled to cast one vote per share, exercisable in person or by a properly executed proxy, with respect to the approval of the proposals and any other matter to be submitted to a vote of our shareholders at the Special Meeting. At April 16, 2010, there were ____________shares of common stock outstanding.
Approval of Proposal No.1 will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon. Therefore, abstentions, broker “non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have the same effect as votes against Proposal No. 1. Approval of Proposal No. 2 and Approval No. 3 requires that the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the number of votes cast against it. Assuming the presence of a quorum, abstentions, broker “non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have no effect on Proposals 2 and 3.
The Board of Directors has unanimously approved each of the proposals and recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the approval of each of the proposals. We are seeking requisite shareholder approval of each of the proposals.
A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the Special Meeting shall be available for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the Special Meeting, during ordinary business hours at the principal executive offices of the Company. The list will also be available at the Special Meeting.
Quorum
The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Special Meeting is a majority of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting by holders of shares of our common stock outstanding on the Record Date. Broker non-votes and shares that are voted “FOR” or “AGAINST” a proposal or marked “ABSTAIN” are treated as being present at the Special Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum and are also treated as shares entitled to vote at the Special Meeting with respect to each proposal.
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Broker “non-votes” and the shares of voting stock as to which a shareholder abstains are included for purposes of determining whether a quorum of shares of voting stock is present at a meeting. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares of voting stock for the beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Proposal 1is a non-discretionary item which means that a nominee may not vote on the proposal without instructions from the beneficial owner. Since Proposal 1 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, abstentions and broker “non-votes” have the effect of votes “AGAINST” Proposal 1. Since Proposal 2 an 3 requires that the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the number of votes cast against it, assuming the presence of a quorum, abstentions and broker “non-votes” will have no effect on Proposal 2 and 3.
9
Brokerage Accounts
If any of your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, bank nominee or other institution, only it can vote such shares and only upon receipt of your specific instructions. Accordingly, please contact the person responsible for your account and instruct that person to execute the proxy card representing your shares. In addition, if you hold your shares in a brokerage or bank account, your broker or bank may allow you to provide your voting instructions by telephone or Internet. Please consult the materials you receive from your broker or bank prior to authorizing a proxy by telephone or Internet.
Proxies
Our Board of Directors is asking for your proxy. Giving the Board of Directors your proxy means you authorize the named proxies to vote your shares at the Special Meeting in the manner you direct. You may vote for or against the proposals or abstain from voting. All valid proxies received prior to the Special Meeting will be voted. All shares of common stock that are represented at the Special Meeting by properly executed proxies received prior to or at the Special Meeting, and not duly and timely revoked, will be voted at the Special Meeting in accordance with the choices marked thereon by the shareholders. Unless a contrary choice is marked, the shares represented by each proxy will be voted FOR approval of each of the proposals. At the time this Proxy Statement was mailed to shareholders, we were not aware that any other matters not referred to herein would be presented for action at the Special Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Special Meeting, the persons designated in the proxy intend to vote the shares represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment.
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is voted. Proxies may be revoked by (i) filing with our Corporate Secretary at or before the taking of the vote at the Special Meeting, a written notice of revocation bearing a later date than the proxy, (ii) duly executing a later-dated proxy relating to the same shares and delivering it to our Corporate Secretary before the taking of the vote at the Special Meeting or (iii) attending the Special Meeting and voting in person (although attendance at the Special Meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy).
Attendance at the Special Meeting
Only holders of common stock may attend the Special Meeting. If you wish to attend the Special Meeting in person but you hold your shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, you must bring proof of your ownership and photo identification at the Special Meeting. For example, you could bring an account statement showing that you beneficially owned shares of our common stock as of the record date as acceptable proof of ownership.
Costs of Solicitation
We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. We may also engage a professional proxy solicitation firm to assist in the proxy solicitation and, if so, will pay such solicitation firm customary fees plus expenses.
10
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Proxy Statement that are “forward-looking statements” are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions. These forward looking statements are based on our current estimates and assumptions and, as such, involve uncertainty and risk. Actual results could differ materially from projected results because of factors such as:
If our shareholders fail to approve the proposed vend-out of our SCI Business, or if we are unable to satisfy the other conditions to closing the proposed transaction, certain of which are not within our control, our liquidity, financial position and business may be harmed.
Even if we complete the proposed transaction, we may be unable to successfully operate our remaining business.
We may be unable to identify potential business opportunities or successfully operate such new businesses once identified.
If we acquire other companies or businesses we will be subject to risks that could harm our business.
Any of these factors could affect our ability to consummate the transaction described herein and cause our actual results to differ materially from the guidance given at this time. For further information about the risks of the proposed transaction and our Company, we refer you to the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page __ as well as the documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly our Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 and our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
There are representations and warranties contained in the Share Purchase Agreement that is attached as an appendix and described herein which were made by the parties to each other as of specific dates. The assertions embodied in these representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the Asset Purchase Agreement and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating its terms. Moreover, certain representations and warranties may not be accurate or complete as of any specified date because they are subject to a contractual standard of materiality that is different from certain standards generally applicable to shareholders or were used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties rather than establishing matters as facts. Therefore, you should not rely on the representations and warranties contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement as statements of factual information.
We do not assume any obligation to update information contained in this document, except as required by federal securities laws. Although this Proxy Statement may remain available on our website or elsewhere, its continued availability does not indicate that we are reaffirming or confirming any of the information contained herein. Neither our website nor its contents are a part of this Proxy Statement.
11
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the special risk considerations described below as well as other information provided to you or referenced in this Proxy Statement in deciding how to vote on the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business. The special risk considerations described below are not the only ones we face. For a discussion of additional risk considerations, we refer to you the documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and our Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009, which are attached asAppendix CandAppendix Dhereto. Additional considerations not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following special risk considerations actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected, the value of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Special Risk Considerations Regarding the Proposed Vend-out of the SCI Business:
If we fail to complete the vend-out of the SCI Business, our business may be harmed.
We cannot assure you that the vend-out of the SCI Business will be completed. As a result of our announcement of the vend-out of the SCI Business, third parties may be unwilling to enter into material agreements with respect to our SCI Business. New or existing customers may prefer to enter into agreements with our competitors who have not expressed an intention to sell their business because customers may perceive that such relationships are likely to be more stable. If we fail to complete the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business, the failure to maintain existing business relationships or enter into new ones could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
You will not receive any of the proceeds from the vend-out of the SCI Business.
The purchase price for the vend-out of the SCI Business will be paid directly to offset existing debt. Therefore, no proceeds will be received by our shareholders as a result of the vend-out.
The Share Purchase Agreement may expose us to contingent liabilities.
Under the Share Purchase Agreement, we are required to indemnify Perry Law for the breach or violation of any representation, warranty or covenant made by us in the Share Purchase Agreement. Significant indemnification claims by Perry Law could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Even if our stockholders approve the vend-out of the SCI Business, we cannot be sure when, or even if, the vend-out of the SCI Business will be completed.
The completion of the wend-out of the SCI Business is subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions, including, among others, the requirement that we obtain shareholder approval of the sale. If we are unable to meet the closing conditions, the Purchaser is not obligated to purchase the SCI Business. We also cannot be sure that other circumstances, for example, a material adverse event, will not arise that would allow the Purchaser to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement prior to closing. If the vend-out is not approved or does not close, our Board of Directors will be forced to evaluate other alternatives, which are expected to be less favorable to us than the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business.
By completing the proposed vend-out, we will be selling our SCI Business which has historically generated substantially all our revenue. In order to increase revenue, we will need to achieve sustained profitably of our Smart-Tek Automated Services subsidiary.
We will be vending out our entire SCI Business which has historically been the source of substantially all of our revenue. Following the vend-out of the SCI Business, we will rely solely on our Smart-Tek Automated Services, Inc. subsidiary for revenue and income. Thought as of the first six months of the fiscal year the new business as
12
ramped up quickly and is showing a profit, there is no guarantee that such a fast growth can be sustained. Also there is no guarantee we will be able to achieve sustained profitability from our Smart-Tek Automated Services, Inc. business or of other new business opportunities.
If we acquire other companies or businesses we will be subject to risks that could hurt our business.
A significant part of our business strategy entails future acquisitions or significant investments in businesses that offer complementary products and services. Promising acquisitions are difficult to identify and complete for a number of reasons. Any acquisitions completed by our company may be made at a premium over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired companies and competition may cause us to pay more for an acquired business than its long-term fair market value. There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete future acquisitions on terms favorable to us or at all. In addition, we may not be able to integrate any future acquired businesses, at all or without significant distraction of management into our ongoing business. In order to finance acquisitions, it may be necessary for us to issue shares of our capital stock to the sellers of the acquired businesses and/or to seek additional funds through public or private financings. Any equity or debt financing, if available at all, may be on terms which are not favorable to us and, in the case of an equity financing or the use of our stock to pay for an acquisition, may result in dilution to our existing stockholders.
13
PROPOSAL NO. 1
APPROVAL OF THE VEND-OUT OF SMART-TEK COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Proposal No. 1: Sale of our Tire Recycling Business:
We have entered into the Share Purchase Agreement (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) with Perry Law (the “Purchaser”) whereby we will sell to the Purchaser the issued and outstanding shares of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. (“SCI”). SCI is in the business of design, sale, installation and service of security technology with electronic hardware and software products. Its projects range from residential and commercial developments to system upgrades and monitoring contracts. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the SCI Business had revenues of $3.3 million or 100% of our total revenue and net loss of $96K or 100% of our loss. At June 30, 2009, the SCI Business had total assets of $1million or 100% of our total assets. As of six months year to date December 31, 2009, our SCI Business had revenues of $3,035,056 or 60.6% of total revenue and net income of $246,265 or 69.3% of total net income. At December 31, 2009, the SCI Business had total assets of $2.1million or 49.5% of our total assets and liabilities of $2.4 million or 55.7% of our total liabilities.
The Parties
Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc.:
The parent, Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc., currently generates revenue from its two subsidiaries:
1) SCI: generates revenue form the installation of security systems in construction projects.
2) Smart-Tek Automated Services, Inc. provides financial services to small and medium-size businesses, relieving our clients from many of the day-to-day tasks that negatively impact their core business operations such as payroll processing, human resources support, workers' compensation insurance, safety programs, employee benefits, and other administrative and aftermarket services predominantly related to staffing - staff leasing, temporary staffing and co-employment. It not only provides core services but a wide selection of employee and employer benefits and aftermarket products.
Perry Law:
Perry Law is the founder of our subsidiary, Smart-Tek Communications Inc. and has been its Chief Executive officer since 1997. Mr. Law has over sixteen years experience in the security/surveillance systems industry and has played a central role in introducing and implementing technological changes in the local/regional security industry. Mr. Law has held numerous executive management positions in both private and public companies and is very active in charitable causes.
Reasons for the Vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. business
We believe that the vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. business and the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement are in the best interests of our shareholders. There are two main reasons for the vend-out;
1) Smart-Tek Communications Inc has struggled through the years to generate revenue and profit. The accumulated deficit through December 31, 2009 is ($6,957,373). This coupled with limited growth potential gives the shareholders limited value.
2) The vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. business will permit us to focus on our new line of business and provide the following anticipated benefits:
14
- Allow us to focus on our new business unit, and identify and develop new opportunities in that unit.
- The new business unit will provide for growth in revenue and profitability as opposed to limited growth in the SCI business.
Our Board of Directors also considered various risks when evaluating the sale of the SCI Business, which include:
- The possibility that the new business does not achieve the revenue and profit growth anticipated;
- The possibility that the proposed sale might not be completed and the effect on our business and financial position; and
- The effect of the public announcement of the proposed vend-out of the SCI business current business.
Background of the vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. business
Despite solid growth over the past ten years, SCI is experiencing a slow-down due to the current economic conditions worldwide. SCI has been affected by the downturn in construction caused by a slowdown in the real estate market plus lower prices of real estate and the fact that construction financing is much harder to obtain in today’s market. SCI’s customers range from developers, general contractors, electrical contractors, property managers, institutions and general business. I response to the slow down, the Board of Directors decided to enter into a growth industry.
On June 23, 2009, it was announced that we added a new line of business providing integrated and cost-effective management solutions in the area of human resources for public and private companies. In connection with the expansion of business operations, Smart-Tek incorporated a subsidiary, Smart-Tek Automated Services, Inc. (“Smart-Tek Automated”), a private Nevada corporation, and entered into a marketing partner agreement dated June 17, 2009 with our wholly owned subsidiary, Smart-Tek Automated, and Brian Bonar, a new director of Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc. For the six month period ending December 31, 2009, Smart-Tek Automated has generated net revenue of $1,971,770 and net income of $206,667 with total asset of $2,128,671 and total liabilities of $1,885,005.
In November 2009 our Board of Director retained an independent financial adviser hired to provide a fairness opinion an delivered a written opinion as to the fairness to the holders of shares of our common stock of the vend-out of the SCI Business, from a financial point of view, considering the cash consideration (before any adjustments) to be paid to us in connection with the vend-out.
In February 2010 we reviewed a draft agreement that covered the basic terms of the proposed transaction. Throughout the following weeks, we and our advisor negotiated the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement with Perry Law and his advisor. On April 7, 2010, we finalized the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement.
On April 7, 2010, our Board of Directors convened a meeting to review the final Share Purchase Agreement and the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business.
Effect of the vend-out of the Smart-Tek Communications Inc. Business
If our shareholders approve the vend-out of the SCI Business, we will seek to complete the vend-out.
We will use the proceeds of the vend-out of the SCI Business as follows:
(c) | $821,756 of the purchase price shall be paid and satisfied by setting-off the Company’s indebtedness to the Perry Law pursuant to a Loan, including all accrued and unpaid interest there under up to the date that the vend-out close; | |
(d) | $1.00 of the purchase price shall be paid by Perry Law for transferring SCI Shares to the Company; and |
15
(c) | $200,000 of the purchase Price shall be paid and satisfied by Perry Law for all amounts owed to Richardson Patel LLP pursuant to the Richardson Patel Litigation. |
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors retained The EMCO/Hanover Group to provide an opinion as to the fairness (from a financial point of view) of the consideration to be received by Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc. from the vend-out to the Purchaser of the Smart-Tek Communications, Inc. business (the “Transaction”). As part of its consulting business, The EMCO/Hanover Group is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and for other corporate and/or personal purposes.
In accordance with the terms of its engagement letter with us, The EMCO/Hanover Group, at the request of our Board of Directors delivered a written opinion to the Board of Directors. The opinion stated that, on the basis of its analyses and review and in reliance on the accuracy and completeness of the information furnished to it and subject to the limitations, qualifications and assumptions noted below and in the full text of its opinion, as of November 11, 2009, the estimated $826,782 to be the fair value of Smart-Tek Communications Inc.
Pursuant to The EMCO/Hanover Group engagement letter, the opinion does not constitute a recommendation to our Board of Directors as to whether it is advisable to enter into the Share Purchase Agreement or as to the amount of the Transaction Consideration, which was determined in arm’s length negotiations between LTS, the Purchaser and us. We imposed no restrictions or limitations upon BCC Advisers’ with respect to the investigations made or the procedures followed by BCC Advisers in rendering its opinion.
The full text of the written opinion of The EMCO/Hanover Group, dated November 13, 2009, is attached asAppendix Bto this Proxy Statement and should be read in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters concerned and limitations on the review undertaken. We paid The EMCO/Hanover Group a fee for the delivery of this opinion.
For purposes of its opinion The EMCO/Hanover Group, among other things:
1. Reviewed the Independent Accountant’s Financial Statements for Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2009 and 2008.
2. Relied on the opinion of Management that anticipated operating results for Fiscal 2010 should be comparable to that attained in Fiscal 2009 even though First Quarter results for Fiscal 2010 were up over the comparable period for Fiscal 2009.
Analysis
The EMCO/Hanover Group analyzed and performed a valuation of Smart-Tek Communications Inc. The EMCO/Hanover Group in valuing Smart-Tek Communications Inc (“SCI”) analyzed SCI’s background information which included reviewing its product line. The EMCO/Hanover Group looked at SCI’s competitors and its financial condition and operating results.
Basis of Valuation
As a basis of valuation, The EMCO/Hanover Group selected four publicly traded companies as comparatives whereby The EMCO/Hanover Group compared such items as revenue, the market cap multiple to revenue that they were selling for, client base, etc.
Basis of Opinion
As a basis for the opinion, The EMCO/Hanover Group using the industry average market capitalization rate determined a gross value for SCI. Then based on a discount standard to be applied due to SCI’s being a private company, The EMCO/Hanover Group was able to determine a fair market value for SCI.
16
Conclusion
Based upon the analyses described above, and such other factors as it deemed relevant, The EMCO/Hanover Group was of the opinion that the fair market value of Smart-Tek Communications, Inc, was $826,782.
The Share Purchase Agreement
The following is a description of the material terms of the Share Purchase Agreement. The following description does not purport to describe all of the terms and conditions of the Share Purchase Agreement. The full text of the Share Purchase Agreement is attached to this proxy statement asAppendix Aand is incorporated by reference. You are urged to read the Share Purchase Agreement in its entirety because it is the legal document that governs the terms and conditions of the proposed vend-out of Smart-Tek Communications Inc..
Structure
The transaction is structured as the vend-out of substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Smart-Tek Communications Inc. by us to Perry Law, its president. The purchase price shall be paid and satisfied by setting-off Smart-Tek Solutions Inc’s indebtedness to the Perry Law pursuant to a Loan, including all accrued and unpaid interest there under up to the date that the vend-out is finalized.
Effective Time
The closing of the transaction is anticipated to occur shortly after we obtain shareholder approval and satisfy all other conditions to Closing.
Purchase Price
As consideration for the vend-out of the SCI business, Perry Law will pay us approximately $822,726, based on the industry average capitalization rate of revenue of 37.1% discounted further based on a discount standard of 40% as a private company plus an additional $200,000 which is to be used concurrent with closing to satisfy an outstanding settlement agreement.
The Share Purchase Agreement is attached to this Proxy Statement asAppendix A. We encourage you to read the Share Purchase Agreement carefully. Our Board of Directors has unanimously approved the Share Purchase Agreement, which is the binding legal agreement that governs the terms of the vend-out of our SCI Business.
Some of the key provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement are as follows:
Representations and Warranties
The Asset Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of the parties relating to, among other things, their authority to enter into the Share Purchase Agreement, no other purchase agreements entered into, right to release SCI’s shares, proper consents obtained, no other conflicts, no bankruptcy or insolvency issues, no litigation and no broker fees.
Indemnification
Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc. (“STTN”) will indemnify and hold harmless Perry Law (the “Purchaser”) and its affiliates and associates from and against any claim, loss, liability (including without limitation for income, capital withholding, stamp duty, excise or other taxes whatsoever or howsoever incurred), damage or expense (including reasonable legal fees) which the Purchaser and/or its affiliates, directly or indirectly, incur, suffer or otherwise become liable for by reason of, or which will result from, arise out of or be based, directly or indirectly upon: (i) the inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the Vendor hereunder; and (ii) the failure of the Vendor to comply with any covenant or agreement made by the Vendor hereunder
17
The Purchaser will indemnify and hold harmless STTN from and against any claim, loss, liability, damage or expense (including reasonable legal fees) which STTN will, directly or indirectly, incur or suffer by reason of, or which will result from, arise out of or be based upon: (i) the inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the Purchaser hereunder; or (ii) the failure of the Purchaser to comply with any covenant or agreement made by the Purchaser hereunder.
Conditions to Closing
The obligations of the parties to complete the vend-out of the SCI Business are subject to certain customary closing conditions, including, among other things:
the accuracy in all material respects of all of our representations and warranties in the Share Purchase Agreement;
our performance in all material respects of all of our covenants and obligations under the Share Purchase Agreement to be performed or complied with by us prior to the completion of the proposed sale of the SCI Business;
no pending litigation
Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc. will deliver and/or pay the following to Perry Law:
a certified copy of the resolutions of the board of directors of the Vendor authorizing the entering into, execution and delivery of this Agreement, the sale of the Purchased Shares and the completion of the other transactions as contemplated by this Agreement;
the share certificate representing the Purchased Shares duly endorsed for transfer to the Purchaser, or an instrument of transfer in respect of the same;
a copy of the Fairness Opinion;
an officer's certificate as contemplated by Section 4.1(b); and
such other documents as the Purchaser may reasonably require.
Perry Law will deliver the following to Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc.:
an executed copy of the Purchaser Release;
the share certificate representing the Smart-Tek Shares duly endorsed for transfer to the Vendor, or an instrument of transfer in respect of the same; and
such other documents as the Vendor may reasonably require.
18
Termination
The Asset Purchase Agreement may be terminated if the vend-out does not occur on or before a certain date.
Related Party Transactions
During the period ended December 31, 2009, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary paid $507,866 in management salaries to its President and Vice president which included bonuses of $445,536. Consulting fees of $46,982 were also incurred during the period. Such costs have been reflected in the accompanying statement of operations. Amounts due to officers and directors were $821,756 as of December 31, 2009.
Certain Material Federal and State Income Tax Consequences
The vend-out contemplated by the Share Purchase Agreement will be a non- transaction taxable to us for United States federal and state income tax purposes.
Accounting Treatment
We will record the vend-out of the SCI Business in accordance with generally accepted principles in the United States. Upon completion of the disposition, we will recognize a small gain for financial statement purposes equal to the net proceeds (sum of purchase price less expenses of the sale) less the book value of the assets and liabilities vended out.
Regulatory Approvals
We are not aware of any federal or state regulatory requirements that must be complied with or approvals that must be obtained to complete the vend-out of the SCI Business. The filing of this Proxy Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) is not required by the Nevada Revised Statutes. If any approvals or filings are required, we will use our commercially reasonable efforts to obtain those approvals and make any required filings before completing the transactions contemplated by the Share Purchase Agreement.
No Changes in the Rights of Shareholders
There will be no change in the rights of our shareholders as a result of the vend-out of the SCI Business.
No Appraisal Rights
Our shareholders do not have appraisal rights under Nevada Revised Statutes in connection with the vend-out of the SCI Business.
Required Vote (see page
The Company is seeking the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock is required in order to approve the vend-out of the SCI Business. Because the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the Special Meeting is required to approve the vend-out of the SCI Business, abstentions, broker “non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the vend-out of the SCI Business. Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be voted “FOR” the approval of the vend-out of the SCI Business.
19
Recommendation of our Board of Directors Regarding the Vend-out of the SCI Business
For the reasons described above, our Board of Directors has determined that the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has unanimously approved the proposed vend-out of the SCI Business and Share Purchase Agreement and unanimously recommends to our shareholders that they vote “FOR” approval of Proposal No. 1: Approval of the vend-out of the SCI Business.
20
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONSINC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
21
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC AND SUBSIDIARY
CONTENTS
22
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Information
On April **, 2010, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Perry Law (“Purchaser”) to sell to the Purchaser all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Smart-tek Communications Inc.
Effective with the agreement the Purchaser will purchase 100 common shares in the capital of Smart-tek Communications Inc. for the purchase price of $1,021,757.
The Purchaser shall pay and fully satisfy the Purchase Price payable to the Company on Closing as follows:
(e) | $821,756of the Purchase Price shall be paid and satisfied by setting-off the Company's indebtedness to the Purchaser pursuant to the Loan, including all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder up to the Closing Date, against the Purchase Price; | |
(f) | $1of the Purchase Price shall be paid by the Purchaser transferring the Smart-tek Communications Inc Shares to the Company; and | |
(g) | $200,000of the Purchase Price shall be paid and satisfied by the Purchaser for all amounts owed to Richardson Patel LLP pursuant to the Richardson Patel Litigation within ninety (90) days the signing of the Vendout agreement. | |
(h) | The Purchaser will cancel any outstanding stock options. | |
(i) | Any outstanding preferred shares shall be redeemed. |
The Pro Forma Unaudited Financial Statements have been prepared by management of Smart-tek Solutions Inc in order to present consolidated financial position and results of operations of Smart-tek Solutions Inc and Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. as if the disposition of Smart-tek Communications Inc. had occurred as of December 31, 2009 for the pro forma condensed balance sheet and to give effect to the disposition, as if the transaction had taken place at July 1, 2009 for the proforma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2009.
The pro forma information is based on historical financial statements and the assumptions and adjustments in the accompanying notes to the proforma financial statements after giving effect to the proposed transaction
The unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations or the financial position which would have been attained had the acquisitions been consummated at either of the foregoing dates or which may be attained in the future. The pro forma financial information should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements of Smart-tek Solutions Inc. (including notes thereto).
23a
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED) |
Smart-tek | ||||||||||||
Smart-tek | Automated | Pro Forma | Pro Forma | |||||||||
Solutions Inc. | Services Inc. | Adjustments | Consolidated | |||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Cash & cash equivalents | $ | - | $ | 234,552 | $ | 234,552 | ||||||
Accounts receivable | - | 233,233 | 233,233 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses | - | 1,629,643 | 1,629,643 | |||||||||
Investment in subsidiary | 1 | - | (1) | (1 | ) | - | ||||||
Due from intercompany | 44,999 | - | (2) | (44,999 | ) | - | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment | - | 31,333 | - | 31,333 | ||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 45,000 | $ | 2,128,761 | $ | (45,000 | ) | $ | 2,128,761 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 2,500 | $ | 1,922,094 | - | $ | 1,924,594 | |||||
Due to Intercompany | - | 44,999 | (2) | (44,999 | ) | - | ||||||
Total liabilities | 2,500 | 1,967,093 | (44,999 | ) | 1,924,594 | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, one (1) shares of Class A preferred issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
Commons stock, $.001 par value, 5000,000,000 shares authorized, 69,314,124 shares issued and outstanding | 69,314 | 1 | (1) | (1 | ) | 69,314 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital | 6,852,863 | - | - | 6,852,863 | ||||||||
Deficit | (6,879,677 | ) | 161,667 | (6,718,010 | ) | |||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 42,500 | 161,668 | (1 | ) | 204,167 | |||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 45,000 | $ | 2,128,761 | $ | (45,000 | ) | $ | 2,128,761 |
23b
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED |
DECEMBER 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED) |
Smart-tek | ||||||||||||
Smart-tek | Automated | Pro Forma | Pro Forma | |||||||||
Solutions Inc. | Services Inc. | Adjustments | Consolidated | |||||||||
REVENUES | $ | - | $ | 1,971,770 | - | $ | 1,971,770 | |||||
COST OF SALES | - | 1,557,463 | - | 1,557,463 | ||||||||
GROSS PROFIT | - | 414,307 | - | 414,307 | ||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | (52,520 | ) | (252,640 | ) | - | (305,160 | ) | |||||
PRO FORMA NET INCOME (LOSS) | (52,520 | ) | 161,667 | - | 109,147 | |||||||
Other comprehensive loss, foreign currency translation adjustments | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
COMPRHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | (52,520 | ) | $ | 161,667 | $ | - | $ | 109,147 | |||
Earnings per share, basic and diluted | $ | 0.01 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 19,712,944 |
23c
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARY |
NOTES TO CONDENSED PRO FORMA UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
The Pro Forma Unaudited Financial Statements have been prepared by management of Smart-tek Solutions Inc in order to present consolidated financial position and results of operations of Smart-tek Solutions Inc and Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. as if the disposition of Smart-tek Communications Inc. had occurred as of December 31, 2009 for the pro forma condensed balance sheet and to give effect to the disposition, as if the transaction had taken place at July 1, 2009 for the proforma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2009.
The following pro forma adjustments are incorporated into the pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
1. | To eliminate the investment in Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. |
2. | To eliminate the intercompany accounts between Smart-tek Solutions Inc. and Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. |
23d
PROPOSAL 2:
APPROVE THE SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC. 2010 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
Purpose:provide the Company with a means of compensating selected key employees (including officers) and directors of and consultants to the Company and its subsidiaries for their services rendered in connection with the development of Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. with shares of Common Stock of the Company. (See Appendix E).
Award or Sales of shares.The Company's Board shall (a) select those key employees (including officers), directors and consultants to whom shares of the Company's Common Stock shall be awarded or sold, and (b) determine the number of shares to be awarded or sold; the time or times at which shares shall be awarded or sold; whether the shares to be awarded or sold will be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and such conditions, rights of repurchase, rights of first refusal or other transfer restrictions as the Board may determine. Each award or sale of shares under the Plan may or may not be evidenced by a written agreement between the Company and the persons to whom shares of the Company's Common Stock are awarded or sold.
Consideration for Shares.Shares of the Company's Common Stock Except as otherwise provided herein, the Option Price shall be fixed by the Committee at the time of the grant of such option and shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock at the time the option is granted. The Committee shall, in good faith, determine the fair market value of the stock (without regard to any restrictions other than a restriction which, by its terms, will never lapse) based upon a reasonable method of valuation adopted by the Committee, or such other method as may be permitted by the Code, or regulations or rulings promulgated there under. In no event shall the Option Price be less than the par value of the Shares. The Committee will use its best efforts to determine the fair market value of the Shares subject to the option, but neither the Committee nor the Company will be responsible for the payment of any tax imposed upon the participants, nor will they reimburse participants for their payment of any tax so imposed. Neither the Company, the Committee, nor any member thereof makes or shall make any representation or warranty to any participant regarding the Federal or State income tax consequences or effects of participation in the Plan.
Shares Subject to the Plan.For purposes of the Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to sell or award up to an additional 3,000,000 shares and/or options of the Company's Common Stock, $.001 par value per share ("Common Stock").
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that our shareholders vote “FOR” approval of the Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. 2010 Stock Compensation Plan.
PROPOSAL 3:
Purpose:To sync the Company’s year-end close with the calendar year ending filings we have to prepare and submit for our clients.
The new line of business is required to process certain calendar year-end filings for its clients. The switch from a fiscal to a calendar year end with facilitate these filings, accordingly our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that our shareholders vote “FOR” approval of Proposal No. 3: Approve the change from a fiscal June year-end to a calendar December year end.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that our shareholders vote “FOR” approval of the change from a fiscal June year-end to a calendar December year end.
24
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
As of March 31, 2010, there were 69,314,124 shares of our common stock outstanding. The following table sets forth certain information known to us with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of that date by (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our executive officers, and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as set forth in the table below, there is no person known to us who beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock.
Name and Address | Number of Shares | ||
Title of Class | of Beneficial Owner | Beneficially Owned(1) | Percentage of Class(1) |
Directors and Officers: | |||
Common Stock | Perry Law 3702 South Virginia Street, Suite G12-401 Reno, NV | 32,817 | * |
Common Stock | Brian Bonar 3702 South Virginia Street, Suite G12-401 Reno, NV | 45,000,000 | 64.9% |
Common Stock | Owen Naccarato 3702 South Virginia Street, Suite G12-401 Reno, NV | - | - |
Common Stock | Directors and Officers as a group(1) | 45,032,817 | 64.9% |
5% Stockholders | |||
Common Stock | Brian Bonar 3702 South Virginia Street, Suite G12-401 Reno, NV | 45,000,000 | 64.9% |
Notes
* | Less than 1% |
(1) | Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. The percentage of class is based on 69,314,124 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010. |
(2) | On June 23, 2008, the Company entered into Debt Settlement Agreements with Perry Law and P5 Holdings Ltd. Perry Law holds all of the voting securities of P5 Holdings Ltd. Pursuant to the terms of the Debt Settlement Agreements, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,203,241 shares (32,817 Post-Reverse Split) to Mr. Law and P5 Holdings Ltd. The shares were issued as consideration of the settlement of unsecured loans in the amount of $287,113.45 owed to Mr. Law and P5 Holdings Ltd. by the Company. |
25
OTHER MATTERS
Our Board of Directors is not aware of any other business that may come before the Special Meeting. However, if additional matters properly come before the Special Meeting, shares represented by all proxies received by our Board of Directors will be voted with respect thereto at the discretion and in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals of stockholders intended for inclusion in the proxy statement to be mailed to all stockholders entitled to vote at our next annual meeting of stockholders must be received at our principal executive offices not later than June 5, 2010. In order to curtail controversy as to the date on which a proposal was received by us, it is suggested that proponents submit their proposals by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission as required by the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. To read or obtain copies of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, you may visit the Securities and Exchange Commission in person, request the documents in writing at prescribed rates or view our filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at:
Securities and Exchange Commission Public Reference Room
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
(800) SEC-0330
www.sec.gov
If you would like additional copies of this proxy statement, or if you have questions about any of the proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting, you should contact:
Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc.
Attn: Brian Bonar
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(866) 257-6675
You can also find additional information about us at our website at www.greenman.biz. Information contained on our website does not constitute part of this document.
REQUEST TO SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROXIES
If you do not intend to be present at the Special Meeting on June 10, 2010, please sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card at your earliest convenience.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
/s/ Brian Bonar
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
26
APPENDIX A
OPINION OF THE VALUE SMART-TEK COMMUNICATIONS INC.
The EMCO/ Hanover Group
Merchant Bankers
November 13, 2009
Smart-Tek Communications Inc.
10-11720 Voyageur Way
Richmond Way V6X 3G9
Canada
Attention: Mr. Perry Law, President/ CEO
Re: | Opinion of the going concern business | |
referenced below to be acquired from | ||
Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. (STTN.OB). |
Gentlemen:
The EMCO/Hanover Group(“EMCO/Hanover”) has been requested to render an opinion on the value of the business,Smart-Tek Communications Inc.(referenced herein to as “STC” or the “Company”) being acquired fromSmart-Tek Solutions Inc. (STTN.OB).For purposes of this opinion it is based on the Independent Accountant’s Financial Statements for Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2009 and 2008. It is further the opinion of management that anticipated operating results for Fiscal 2010 should be comparable to that attained in Fiscal 2009 even though First Quarter results for Fiscal 2010 were up over the comparable period for Fiscal 2009.
Conclusion
It is the opinion of The EMCO/Hanover Group (“EMCO/Hanover”) that the Fair Market Value of the business of Smart-Tek Communications Inc. being acquired from Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. is US$ 826,782. For basis, see Section: Valuation Opinion herein – Page 4 herein.
To Be Acquired Business: Smart-Tek Communications Inc
a.) General Background Information
Post acquisition, Smart-Tek Communications Inc., incorporated on October 29, 1996 in the Province of British Columbia, Canada, is in the business of the design, sale, installation and service of security technology with electronic hardware, software products and structure cabling. Their primary business deals with residential high rise buildings and commercial developments plus system upgrades and monitoring contracts, with a 100% of its business in Canada.
11740-11 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049-2996
Telephone: (310) 471-373 5 Fax: (310) 440-2214 Email: bbarren@verizon.net
website:www.emcohanover.com
It is not a manufacturer of system’s equipment but and off the shelf purchaser of product, similar to butmuch smaller than Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc, subsequently described herein.STC’s sales and technical installation team has over 50 years of experience specializing in the design, sales, installation and service of CCTV, access control, intercom, security, structuring cabling and wireless communicate on systems.
Despite solid growth over the past 10 years, the to-be-acquired Company is currently experiencing a slowness due to the current economic conditions worldwide since developers have slowed down construction caused by a slow down in the real estate market plus lower prices of real estate and the fact that construction financing is much harder to obtain in today’s market. Customers range from developers, general contractors, electrical contractors, property managers, institutions and general business.
TheCompanycurrently has 32 employees, with Perry Law being its President and Stephan Pratt as a Vice President. Each co-share the responsibility for administration, customer relations and sales.
b.) Competition
Over the past 5 years according to its management, STC’s average work load has been about 10 projects per year with a value range of $100,000 to $ 400,000. Management considers that its local competitors are:
1.) Intercomhas about 20 employees in the Vancouver area. However, it is part of ADT North America which in turn is a subsidiary of Tyco Fire & Security (NYSE: TYC). ADT has some 200 sales offices plus 7 customer monitoring centers and 22,000 employees in the United States and Canada.
2.) Blue Mountain Security is privately-held and has some 10 employees in the Vancouver area.
3.) Cobra Security is privately-held and has some 10-15 employees in the Vancouver area.
4.) D&L Security is also privately-held and has some 8-10 employees in the Vancouver area.
5.) Horizon Communications is privately-held and has some 25 employees in the Vancouver area.
6.) Milson Multimedia is privately-held and has some 15-20 employees in the Vancouver area.
c) Financial Condition and Operating Performance
For the Fiscal Period just ended June 30, 2009 the Company’s Balance Sheet was reported as: Total Current Assets ($1,09,295); Fixed and Other Assets ($59,469) for Total Assets of $1,163,763 – all reported in U.S. Dollars. Liabilities, all current, were: $1,951,204 causing a Negative Net Worth of <$787,442>.
Gross Revenue for Fiscal 2009 year-end (through June 30, 2009) was $3,816,873 versus $3,804,213 for Fiscal 2008. Gross Profit for Fiscal 2009 was $834,462 (or 22%) versus $844,791 for Fiscal 2008. Net Income for 2009 was $44,482 compared to $23,109 for Fiscal 2008.
The EMCO/Hanover Group
Merchant Bankers
Basis of Valuation
1.) Comparatives Companies Selected
Since none of STC’s competitive companies were publicly-held,EMCO/Hanoverreviewed four publicly-traded companies as comparatives in order to arrive at its opinion herein. These included:
1.)Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.(Symbol: HBE), with revenues of $60.6M and selling at a market cap. to revenue multiple of $24.1M to $60.6M or 39.8%, operates in the electronic physical security industry, which provides technology- based integrated electronic security systems, services, and emergency preparedness consultation to commercial enterprises and government agencies in the United States. It operates in two segments: a.) security system integration and b.) specialty products and services.Itis not a manufacturer of its products.
2.)Magal Security Systems Ltd.(Symbol: MAGS), with revenues of $70M and selling at a market cap. multiple to revenue multiple of $40.4M to $70.4M or 57.4%, engaged in the development, manufacture, marketing, and sale of computerized security systems that detect and deter human intrusion.
3.)Napco Security Technologies, Inc.(Symbol: NSSC), with revenues of $70M and selling at a market cap. multiple to revenue of $34.2M to $70M or 48.9%, in the manufacture and sale of security products, including intrusion and fire alarms, building access control systems, and electronic devices worldwide.
4.)Visual Management Systems, Inc.(Symbol: VMSY.OB), with revenues of $4.7M and selling at a market cap. multiple to revenue of $2.7M to $4.7M or 57.4%, engaged in the design, manufacture, sale, installation, upgradation, and service of digital surveillance systems that enables clients to manage their businesses, and secure their homes or campuses with video data retrieval and live viewing.
In addition to the above,EMCO/Hanoveralso reviewed industry data to determine what the average market cap. multiple to revenue were, namely: $26.1M to 70.4M or 37.1% . As such,EMCO/Hanoverselected the latter which was close to that reflected by Henry Bros. above, given that fact that neither Henry Bros. or Smart-Tek were manufacturers but distributors.
b.) Basis of Opinion
Given Fiscal 2009 revenues of $3,714,205 and using the industry average market capitalization rate of 37.1% -as noted above, this would yield a gross value of $1,377,970. Based on a discount standard of 40% as a private company - given today’s economic environment (versus the typical standard of 30%), this would yield a fair market value of $826,782 as noted below, yielding a net transaction value at June 30,2009 of $39,341 ($826,782 - $787,441 as reflected by the then negative Shareholders’ Equity Account).
The EMCO/Hanover Group
Merchant Bankers
$3,714,205 (gross revenue for Fiscal 2009)x.371 (industry average market capitalization, per above) = $1,377,970
$1,377,970 x.40 (discount applied as a private company) =$826,782 or $39,341 per above
Opinion Qualification
For purposes of this valuation,EMCO/Hanoverhas relied on certain information supplied by the Company’s management and certain of its outside advisors - including that referred to herein. As such,EMCO/Hanoverdoes not attest to the accuracy or reliability of this information or to any subsequent events which might or might not affect their accuracy or reliability, either positively or adversely, since the date of this opinion.
Credentials of the Undersigned
Bruce W. Barrenis Group Chairman ofThe EMCO/Hanover Group, which, since its inception in 1971, has concluded more than $3 billion in financial transactions worldwide as international merchant bankers, representing more than 1,000 separate corporate transactions.Mr. Barrenspecializes in matters attendant to the senior management decision process including those relating to executive/employee compensation, wrongful terminations, board representation, operating management, planning, financial administration, debt and capital sourcing encompassing all types of investment requirements - business turnarounds, capital restructuring and merger/acquisition, plus foreign licensing along with corporate valuations for cash/ collateral purposes under the U. S. Bankruptcy Act and separately, for estate planning - including tangible and intangible assets.
Mr. Barrenhas personally been involved in more than 200 business turnarounds, representing more than $1 billion in annualized payroll. He has been honored on more than 50 separate occasions by: the governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania plus New York, and New Jersey (in addition to their respective U.S. Senators) along with the governors of Kentucky and Tennessee. In California, he has received commendations from various municipal and county governments as well as its State Assembly, Senate, Offices of the State Treasurer, Controller and several Governors.
As part of these accolades,Mr. Barrenhas also received more than a dozen individual U.S. Congressional Tributes, both from the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, including one in 1990 from then Congressman Christopher Cox- subsequently the 28th Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In 1989, Mr. Barren was honored with a commemorative from President Ronald Reagan. Further, between 2000 to 2005 he received letters of commendation from then President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore plus President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard Cheney along with then U.S. Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton (subsequently appointed in 2009 as the U.S. Secretary of State under President Obama) for his 35+ years of service to the country, various states and their respective community.
The EMCO/Hanover Group
Merchant Bankers
UnderEMCO/Hanover's Executive Loan Program,Mr. Barrenhas assumed a number of senior on-line managerial positions, ranging from small- and medium-sized companies to those in the multi-national marketplace. Under this program, Mr. Barren has acted as: a Chief Executive Officer on a motorcycle manufacturer and a President of a microwave equipment manufacturing company – both for separate venture capital firms then located in New York City; a Chief Executive Officer of a California bank under FDIC approval; President of a HMO medical provider, with 23 offices in Southern California, under the State of California, Department of Insurance's approval; Chairman of a printing/graphic design business and as a Chief Executive and Administrative Officer for various companies in the construction/ real estate industry, both commercial and residential.
From 1959 to 1962,Mr. Barrenwas an Executive Vice President and Board Member of a multi-national industrial processing and chemical company, which he was forced to assume while he was in college, following the death of his father. Other prior experiences include an association with Price Waterhouse (1963-1967) where his responsibilities were directed primarily to client marketing-related problems at the chief executive officer level, involving such companies as Paramount Pictures, Saab Motors (Sweden) and Electrolux. Between 1968 and 1971 he was a member of several Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulated investment banking firms, first as a Vice President at Walston & Co., Inc. and then as a Director/ Senior Vice President of Delafield Childs, Inc. – both then located in New York City.
In 1971,Mr. Barrenbecame a Senior Vice President for an AMEX publicly-traded printing services company which also controlled a related company, listed in the Over-the-Counter Marketplace. Since then, he has been advisor to a number of other SEC regulated firms (Bregman Securities, Jesup & Lamont plus Birr Wilson) and in the late 1980’s to Transatlantic Capital Bio-Sciences Fund (London, England) - a “first-stage”, medical biosciences venture fund, whose investors included Johnson & Johnson International and Fison Pharmaceutical. Currently,Mr. Barrencontinues to act as an advisor to a variety of companies, engaged in a diversity of business – worldwide, including having served as the designated Chairman of the Executive Committee in 2005-6 for a U.S. publicly held company, with two mandates from the Peoples Republic of China (PRC): to upgrade its Level II hospitals and to introduce the concept of Assisted Care Living.
From 1985-87,Mr. Barrenacted as Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of a $200 million multinational transportation services company operating in some 40 different countries involving Europe along with North, Central and South America, plus Africa and the Middle East in addition to the Far East prior to its acquisition by a foreign corporation, In 1990-91, he was appointed Chief Executive office for a $750 million company operating throughout North America, Korea and England. From 1993 to 1996, Mr. Barren initially acted as an advisor and then became the Chief Executive Officer for an aerospace company in order to effect its capital formation program. In so doing, he was further appointed a co-conservator of this company by The Superior Court of Los Angeles, California.
The EMCO/Hanover Group
Merchant Bankers
Prior to becoming Chairman of Technical Asset Management LTD (England),Mr. Barrenwas Chief Executive Officer for a multi-national direct sales company, headquartered in Nanjing (PRC), and serving the Far East. Through 2004,Mr. Barrenacted as the Lead Consultant for a medical services company whose primary activities focused on Mainland China. Because of his vast experience, he has been featured in more than 150 articles by various newspapers and internet media in the Far East (China and Japan), Europe and the United States, as "turnaround" specialist and business expert, including for one of the "Big 4" accounting firms' KMPG’s Banking Insider, and separately, KMPG's Commissions Markets Insider.
In 2005,Mr. Barrenbecame an audio conferencing instructor for Progressive Business Publications (PBP) –representing an audience of some 70,000 people, including Chief Financial Officers for both publicly- and privately-held companies. In 2007, he continued as a CPE-Accredited instructor but this time the topic was: “Cash management: Building and fortifying a strong cash flow strategy.”
In litigation support,Mr. Barrenhas been accepted as a multi-industry expert in some 40 cases, including against such industry leaders like The Chase Manhattan Bank, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo Bank and The Ford Motor Company - representing a variety of capital transactions, plus minority shareholder interest, management and their fiduciary responsibilities, executive/employee compensation, wrongful employment terminations, corporate valuations plus a diversity of corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions. As such, he has given testimony in Federal and State Courts plus the U.S. Tax Court and before the IRS plus acted as an expert on behalf of the Securities and Exchange Commission. During his 35 year career, he has written more than 500 valuation opinions.Further, Mr. Barren was also the approved expert in the case: I.O.M. Investments (Monitor Dynamics, Inc., a company involved in the security systems business, the same as in which Smart-Tek Communications Inc. also operates)versus the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
Mr. Barren, who has been on various television and radio stations throughout the U.S. as part of his distinguished career, has appeared before numerous professional societies, including the American Management Association, conducting lectures and seminars on executive management, strategic planning, corporate finance, merger/acquisition and other business-related matters. From 1978 through 1995,Mr. Barrenauthored and conducted advanced courses in CRISIS MANAGEMENT, CORPORATE VALUATION TECHNIQUES, MERGER AND ACQUISITIONS, LITIGATION SUPPORT plus CAPITAL SOURCING under the Continuing Professional Education (CPE) program of the then 32,000-member California Certified Public Accountants Foundation for Education and Research, the 35,000-member State of New York, and the 30,000-member Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants.
The EMCO/Hanover Group
Merchant Bankers
During the 1980's and 1990's,Mr. Barrenappeared on various radio and television shows as an expert in business and the U. S. economy. Between 1991-1993, he was a frequent guest speaker to a number of Price Waterhouse (now PriceWaterhouseCoopers) CFO Forums in Southern California plus acted as a panel judge for Ernst & Young’s Annual Entrepreneurial Awards. For 2001,Mr. Barrenwas appointed to the Editorial Advisory Board of Prentice-Hall.
From 1990 to 2002,Mr. Barrentaught courses as a part-time visiting lecturer for the Anderson Graduate School of Business-UCLA, The University of Southern California; Pepperdine University's Executive MBA Program plus Whittier College of Law and Chapman University's School of Law. In 1995-1996,Mr. Barrenco-instructed various "workshop" courses in loan documentation and valuation procedures for Sanwa Bank, then one of the top five international banks.
Since 2005,Mr. Barrenhas received a number of accolades from various Latin American Countries for his many years of service to them. First, he was honored by the Central American Parliament and then by the President of CENTROAMERICANA DE INVERSIONES S. DE R. L. for his 40-years of service to its member countries in aiding their trade, both imports and exports – worldwide. This was then followed by honoringMr. Barrenfor his countless efforts in helping Latin Americans in North America which has resulted in the creation or saving of employment of its people. Subsequently,Mr. Barrenwas also given another commendation. This was from FUNHDICOL (Fundacion Hondurena Para El Desarrollo Intelectual y Colectivo) for his many years of services in which he has assisted in many of this institution’s financial transactions which has helped in this country’s development.
In 2006,Mr. Barrenwas the Presenter for "Businessman of the Year" Award at the Trumpet Awards Ceremony in Atlanta, Georgia - the “Oscars” for African American Community Service. In 2006,Mr. Barrenwas presented with a Certificate of Honor from China's State-owned Supervision and Administration Commission of the People's Government of Hunan Province for his "great contribution" for establishing the first Sino-American Joint Ventured Hospital. Subsequently, he was also the keynote speaker at the 20th Annual China Industry Development Forum in Dongguan held by the China Tourist Hotels Association and received a plaque for his being an advisor to the Association.Mr. Barren, underEMCO/Hanover, has further been given an exclusive right to acquire majority control in the privatization of the multiple water treatment facility(s) in China.
In 2007,Mr. Barren, who has appeared on Chinese television on a number of occasions, was presented with a second Certificate of Honor. This time, it was in recognition of his efforts in the award of the first ever granted license to build an assisted-care living community in China which will consist of some 12,000 senior citizen, housing units. Separately, he also received a Letter of Appointment as a senior consultant for the Prosperity of Baotou business and investment from the Baotou Disabled People Welfare Fund Association of The Red Cross of Baotou City, Inner Monogolia from its Chairman – Zheng Jinduo. Concurrent with that, Mr. Barren was further appointed a senior consultant for The Association of Entrepreneur’s Friend, Baotou CPPCC by its President – Li yu ran.
The EMCO/Hanover Group
Merchant Bankers
In 2008,Mr. Barrenjoined the Board of Directors of Elephant Talk Holdings, Inc., a publicly-traded U.S. Company. Elephant Talk is an international telecom operator and enabler/systems integrator to the multi-media industry by facilitating the distribution of all forms of content and telecom services to global consumers. Besides various worldwide licenses in over a dozen markets in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, it also has a license to operate telecommunication switching facilities in China. Through mid-2009 before resigning,Mr. Barrenserved as its Company’s Vice Chairman in addition to being Chairman of its Compensation Committees plus the independent Director for its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee along with its Audit Committee.
In May 2009,Mr. Barrenmet with the major of Shenyang, China. At that time he was appointed an honorary financial and economic adviser to the City of Shenyang. As part of his appointmentMr. Barrenwill attend the City’s yearly economic forum and other key meeting with the Mayor of Shenyang.
Mr. Barrenhas been listed in Marquis' Who's Who in the World since 1989 where also his academic credentials are presented. These include a Bachelor of Science degree from Babson College in 1962, a Master’s Degree from Bucknell University in 1963 plus in 1967 and 1968, two graduate certificates in International Marketing and Finance - with one, from the Harvard Business School and the other, from Cambridge University (Pembroke College) – England.
For additional information onMr. BarrenandEMCO/Hanover, please refer to the Company’s website atwww.emcohanover.com.
Cordially,
The EMCO/Hanover Group
/s/ Bruce Barren
Bruce W. Barren, Chairman
The EMCO/Hanover Group
Merchant Bankers
APPENDIX B
SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Between
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC.
and
PERRY LAW
April 1, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 1st day of April, 2010.
BETWEEN:
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC., a corporation incorporated under the | ||
laws of the State of Nevada with an address for business at 3702 South | ||
Virginia Street, Suite G12-401 Reno, NV 89502 | ||
(the "Vendor") |
AND:
PERRY LAW, a businessman with an address for business at Unit 10- | ||
11720 Voyageur Way, Richmond, B.C. V6X 3G9 | ||
(the "Purchaser") |
WHEREASthe Parties wish to carry-out the transactions set out herein, including without limitation the purchase and sale of the Purchased Shares (as such term is defined herein), upon the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFOREin consideration of the mutual premises, covenants and agreements in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties), the Parties agree as follows:
1. INTERPRETATION
1.1 Definitions
In this Agreement:
(a) | "Agreement" means this agreement and any recitals and schedules to this agreement, as amended, supplemented or restated from time to time; | |
(b) | "Business Day" means any day other than Saturday, Sunday or any statutory holiday in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; | |
(c) | "Closing Date" means the earlier of: (i) ___________, 2010; (ii) three (3) Business Days following the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions precedent hereunder; or (iii) such other date as the Parties may mutually agree to; | |
(d) | "Closing" means the completion of the transfer of the Purchased Shares from the Vendor to the Purchaser and the completion of the other ancillary transactions set out herein in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; | |
(e) | "Effective Date" means _____________, 2010; | |
(f) | "Fairness Opinion" has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.1(i) hereof; |
2
(g) | "GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles in effect in the United States; | |
(h) | "Loan" means the unsecured loans in the aggregate principal amount of $821,756 granted by the Purchaser to the Vendor; | |
(i) | "Parties" means the parties to this Agreement and "Party" means any one of them; | |
(j) | "Purchase Price" means an aggregate amount of $1,021,757; | |
(k) | "Purchaser Release" means a release and discharge to be granted by the Purchaser in favour of the Vendor, substantially in the form attached as Schedule A hereto; | |
(l) | "Purchased Shares" means the SCI Shares; | |
(m) | "Purchaser" means Perry Law; | |
(n) | "Richardson Patel Litigation" means the litigation, claims and proceedings currently being instituted, or which in the future may be instituted, by Richardson Patel LLP against the Vendor; | |
(o) | “SCI” means Smart-Tek Communications Inc., a British Columbia corporation; | |
(p) | "SCI Shares" means 100 common shares in the capital of SCI owned by the Vendor; | |
(q) | "Smart-Tek Shares" means 32,814 shares of common stock in the capital of the Vendor beneficially owned by the Purchaser; and | |
(r) | "Vendor" means Smart-Tek Solutions Inc., a Nevada corporation. |
1.2 Headings
The division of this Agreement into sections and the insertion of headings are for convenience only and do not form a part of this Agreement and will not be used to interpret, define or limit the scope, extent or intent of this Agreement.
1.3 Section References
Unless otherwise specified, references in this Agreement to sections are to sections of this Agreement.
1.4 Number and Gender
Unless otherwise specified, words importing the singular include the plural and vice versa and words importing gender include all genders.
1.5 Time of Day
Unless otherwise specified, references to time of day or date mean the local time or date in Vancouver, British Columbia.
3
1.6 Use of the Word "Including"
The word "including" when following any general term or statement will not be construed as limiting the general term or statement to the specific matter immediately following the word "including" or to similar matters, and the general term or statement will be construed as referring to all matters that reasonably could fall within the broadest possible scope of the general term or statement.
1.7 Currency
All references to amounts of money mean lawful currency of the United States unless otherwise specified.
1.8 Accounting Terms
An accounting term which is not otherwise defined has the meaning assigned to it, and all accounting matters will be determined, in accordance with GAAP consistently applied.
1.9 Governing Law
This Agreement and each of the documents contemplated by or delivered under or in connection with this Agreement are governed exclusively by, and are to be enforced, construed and interpreted exclusively in accordance with, the laws of the Province of British Columbia and the laws of Canada applicable therein, which will be deemed to be the proper law of this Agreement. The Parties hereby agree that any action or proceeding related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated herein shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the Province of British Columbia and for that purpose hereby attorn and submit to the jurisdiction of such British Columbia court.
2. SHARE TRANSFERS
2.1 Purchase and Sale of Purchased Shares
Subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, at Closing, but effective as of the Effective Date, the Vendor hereby agrees to sell, assign and transfer the Purchased Shares to the Purchaser and the Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase the Purchased Shares.
2.2 Payment of Purchase Price
The Purchaser shall pay and fully satisfy the Purchase Price payable to the Vendor on Closing as follows:
(a) | $821,756of the Purchase Price shall be paid and satisfied by setting-off the Vendor's indebtedness to the Purchaser pursuant to a Loan, including all accrued and unpaid interest there under up to the Closing Date, against the Purchase Price; | |
(b) | $1.00of the Purchase Price shall be paid by the Purchaser transferring the Smart-Tek Shares to the Vendor as provided for in Section 6.3 hereof; and | |
(c) | $200,000of the Purchase Price shall be paid and satisfied by the Purchaser for all amounts owed to Richardson Patel LLP pursuant to the Richardson Patel Litigation within ninety (90) days the signing of this document. | |
(d) | Purchaser consents to the cancellation of any outstanding options beneficially owned by him. |
4
(e) | Purchaser agrees to transfer all preferred shares of the Vendor beneficially owned by the purchaser as provided for in Section 6.3 hereof. |
3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
3.1 Vendor's Representations and Warranties
The Vendor represents and warrants to the Purchaser as follows and acknowledges that the Purchaser is relying on such representations and warranties in connection with the transactions set out herein:
(a) | Organization and Power- the Vendor is a company duly incorporated and validly existing under the laws of the State of Nevada and has the power, authority and capacity to enter into this Agreement on the terms and conditions herein set forth and to carry out the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; | |
(b) | Due Authorization- the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereunder have been authorized by all necessary action on the part of the Vendor, including without limitation the approval of the Vendor's audit committee and board of directors; | |
(c) | Title to Shares- the Vendor is the registered and beneficial owner of the Purchased Shares, and such Purchased Shares will be transferred to the Purchaser free and clear of any mortgages, liens, charges, restrictions, security interests, adverse claims, pledges, encumbrances, options or other restrictions (under law, contract or otherwise), or demands whatsoever (each a "Lien") except those restrictions solely know of by the Purchaser; | |
(d) | No Other Purchase Agreements- no person, firm or corporation has, or will have, any agreement or option or any right or privilege (whether by law, pre-emptive or contractual) capable of becoming an agreement or option for the purchase, acquisition or transfer from the Vendor of any of the Purchased Shares or any interest therein or right thereto owned by the Vendor, other than the Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement; | |
(e) | Enforceable Agreement- this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Vendor and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Vendor, enforceable by the Purchaser against the Vendor in accordance with its terms, subject to the availability of equitable remedies and the enforcement of creditors' rights generally; | |
(f) | No Conflicts– Neither the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Vendor nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will conflict with or result in any breach or violation of the provisions of, or constitute a default (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) under, the constating documents of the Vendor or any law, rule, regulation, judgment, writ, order, decree, indenture, mortgage, lease, loan agreement or other agreement, contract or instrument by which the Vendor or the Purchased Shares are subject, bound or affected, and will not result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the Purchased Shares; | |
(g) | Consents. – No approval, consent, order, authorization or other action by, or notice to or filing with, any governmental authority or regulatory or self regulatory agency, or any other person or entity, and no lapse of a waiting period, is required in connection with the execution, delivery or performance by the Vendor or enforcement against the Vendor of this Agreement or the transfer of the Purchased Shares; |
5
(h) | Bankruptcy and Insolvency Matters– No action or proceeding has been commenced or filed by or against the Vendor or which seeks or may lead to bankruptcy or any other similar proceeding in respect of the Vendor. No such action or proceeding has been authorized or is being considered by or on behalf of the Vendor and no creditor or equity security holder of the Vendor has, to the knowledge of the Vendor, threatened to commence or advise that it may commence, any such action or proceeding; | |
(i) | Fairness Opinion– The Vendor has received an opinion (the "Fairness Opinion") from its external advisors to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, subject to the assumptions and limitations set out therein, the consideration received by the Vendor in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Vendor; | |
(j) | Broker's Fees– The Vendor has not incurred any obligation or liability, contingent or otherwise for broker's or finder's fees in respect of the transactions herein provided for which the Purchaser shall have any obligation and liability; and | |
(k) | Litigation- there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation pending or currently threatened against the Vendor that questions the validity of this Agreement or the right of the Vendor to enter into this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. |
3.2 Purchaser's Representations and Warranties
The Purchaser represents and warrants to the Vendor as follows and acknowledges that the Vendor is relying on such representations and warranties in connection with the transactions set out herein:
(a) | Enforceable Agreement- this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Purchaser and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Purchaser, enforceable by the Vendor against the Purchaser in accordance with its terms, subject to the availability of equitable remedies and the enforcement of creditors' rights generally; | |
(b) | Bankruptcy and Insolvency Matters– No action or proceeding has been commenced or filed by or against the Purchaser which seeks or may lead to bankruptcy or any other similar proceeding in respect of the Purchaser. No such action or proceeding has been authorized or is being considered by or on behalf of the Purchaser and no creditor or equity security holder of the Purchaser has, to the knowledge of the Purchaser, threatened to commence or advise that it may commence, any such action or proceeding; | |
(c) | Broker's Fees– The Purchaser has not incurred any obligation or liability, contingent or otherwise for broker's or finder's fees in respect of the transaction herein provided for which the Vendor shall have any obligation and liability; | |
(d) | Smart-Tek Shares– the Purchaser is the lawful beneficial owner of 32,814 Smart-Tek Shares and these Smart-Tek Shares transferred to the Vendor pursuant to this Agreement will be, when transferred, free and clear of any Liens; | |
(e) | No Other Purchase Agreements– as of Closing no person, firm or corporation has, or will have, any agreement or option or any right or privilege (whether by law, pre-emptive or contractual) capable of becoming an agreement or option for the purchase, acquisition or transfer from the Purchaser any of the Smart-Tek Shares or any interest therein or right thereto owned by the Purchaser, other than the Vendor pursuant to this Agreement; |
6
(f) | Consents– no approval, consent, order, authorization or other action by, or notice to or filing with, any governmental authority or regulatory or self regulatory agency, or any other person or entity, and no lapse of a waiting period, is required in connection with the execution, delivery or performance by the Purchaser of this Agreement; and | |
(g) | Litigation- there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation pending or currently threatened against the Purchaser its affiliates that questions the validity of this Agreement or the right of the Purchaser to enter into this Agreement or to consummate, or cause to be consummated, the transactions contemplated hereby. |
3.3 Purchaser's Regulation S Representations and Warranties
The Purchaser represents and warrants to the Vendor as follows and acknowledges that the Vendor is relying on such representations and warranties in connection with the transactions set out herein:
(a) | the Purchaser is not a “U.S. Person” as such term is defined by Regulation S (“Regulation S”) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “U.S. Securities Act”), and is not acquiring the SCI Shares for the account or benefit of a U.S. Person. | |
(b) | The SCI Shares to be issued to the Purchaser in accordance with the terms of the Agreement will be “restricted securities” within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act and will be issued in accordance with Regulation S. | |
(c) | The Purchaser agrees not to engage in hedging transactions with regard to the SCI Shares to be issued to the Purchaser unless in compliance with the U.S. Securities Act. | |
(d) | The Purchaser agrees that, the Vendor will refuse to register any transfer of the SCI Shares to be issued to the Purchaser not made in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S of the U.S. Securities Act, pursuant to registration under the U.S. Securities Act, pursuant to an available exemption from registration, or pursuant to the Agreement. | |
(e) | The Purchaser acknowledges that none of the SCI Shares have been or will be registered under the U.S. Securities Act, or under any state securities or "blue sky" laws of any state of the United States, and, unless so registered, may not be offered or sold in the United States or, directly or indirectly, to U.S. Persons, as that term is defined in Regulation S, except in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S, pursuant to an effective registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act, or pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and in each case only in accordance with applicable securities laws; | |
(f) | The Purchaser acknowledges that the Vendor has not undertaken, and will have no obligation, to register any of the SCI Shares under the U.S. Securities Act or any other applicable securities legislation; and | |
(g) | The Purchaser is outside the United States when receiving and executing this agreement and is acquiring the SCI Shares as principal for its own account, for investment purposes only, and not with a view to, or for, resale, distribution or fractionalization thereof, in whole or in part, and no other person has a direct or indirect beneficial interest in the SCI Shares. |
7
4. CONDITIONS TO OBLIGATION OF THE PURCHASER
4.1 Conditions to Obligation of the Purchaser
The obligation of the Purchaser to consummate the transactions set out herein on the Closing Date will be subject to the fulfillment on or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions, any of which may be waived by the Purchaser:
(a) | Regulatory Approval- the Purchaser shall have received all regulatory approvals or consents necessary to consummate the transactions set out herein including, without limitation, the purchase of the Purchased Shares; | |
(b) | Representations and Warranties; Performance of Obligations- the representations and warranties of the Vendor set forth in this Agreement will be true and correct when made, and will be true and correct on the Closing Date with the same force and effect as if they had been made on and as of the Closing Date, the Vendor will have performed, satisfied and complied with all obligations and conditions required to be performed or observed by it under this Agreement on or prior to the Closing Date and the Vendor will have delivered to the Purchaser a certificate of the Vendor dated the Closing Date certifying that the foregoing has been satisfied, such certificate to be in form and substance satisfactory to the Purchaser, acting reasonably; | |
(c) | No Litigation or Legislation- no statute, rule, regulation, decree, ruling or injunction will have been enacted or entered into, and no litigation, proceeding, government inquiry or investigation will be pending, which challenges, prohibits or restricts, or seeks to prohibit or restrict, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
5. CONDITIONS TO OBLIGATION OF THE VENDOR
5.1 Conditions to Obligation of the Vendor
The obligation of the Vendor to consummate the transactions set out herein on the Closing Date will be subject to the fulfillment on or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions, any of which may be waived by the Vendor:
(a) | Regulatory Approval- the Vendor shall have received all regulatory approvals or consents necessary to consummate the transactions set out herein including, without limitation, the purchase of the Purchased Shares; | |
(b) | Representations and Warranties; Performance of Obligations- the representations and warranties of the Purchaser set forth in this Agreement will be true and correct when made, and will be true and correct on the Closing Date with the same force and effect as if they had been made on and as of the Closing Date, the Purchaser will have performed, satisfied and complied with all obligations and conditions required to be performed or observed by them under this Agreement on or prior to the Closing Date; and | |
(c) | No Litigation or Legislation- no statute, rule, regulation, decree, ruling or injunction will have been enacted or entered into, and no litigation, proceeding, government inquiry or investigation will be pending, which challenges, prohibits, restricts, or seeks to prohibit or restrict, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
8
6. CLOSING
6.1 Time and Place of Closing
Subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of the conditions set forth in Sections 4 and 5 herein, the Closing shall take place at 10:00 a.m. (pacific standard time) on the Closing Date at the offices of _______________________, or at such other time and/or place as the Parties mutually agree.
6.2 Vendor's Closing Deliveries
Unless waived by the Purchaser, on or before Closing, the Vendor will deliver and/or pay the following to the Purchaser:
(a) | a certified copy of the resolutions of the board of directors of the Vendor authorizing the entering into, execution and delivery of this Agreement, the sale of the Purchased Shares and the completion of the other transactions as contemplated by this Agreement; | |
(b) | the share certificate representing the Purchased Shares duly endorsed for transfer to the Purchaser, or an instrument of transfer in respect of the same; | |
(c) | a copy of the Fairness Opinion; | |
(d) | an officer's certificate as contemplated by Section 4.1(b); and | |
(e) | such other documents as the Purchaser may reasonably require. |
6.3 Purchaser's Closing Deliveries
Unless waived by the Vendor, on or before Closing, the Purchaser will deliver the following to the Vendor:
(a) | an executed copy of the Purchaser Release; | |
(b) | the share certificate representing the Smart-Tek Shares duly endorsed for transfer to the Vendor, or an instrument of transfer in respect of the same; | |
(c) | all preferred share certificates beneficially owned by the Purchaser, duly endorsed for transfer to the Vendor, or an instrument of transfer in respect of the same; and | |
(d) | such other documents as the Vendor may reasonably require. |
6.4 Terms of Closing
(a) | Closing shall not be completed, nor shall the documents tabled for delivery at Closing, be delivered or released, until all of the conditions of Closing (including the deliveries contemplated by this Article 6 and the conditions set forth in Articles 4 and 5) have been fulfilled or waived and each of the parties hereto or their respective counsel shall have confirmed the same. | |
(b) | The Closing of the transactions contemplated hereby shall occur concurrently. |
9
7. SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS
7.1 Survival of Representations, Warranties and Covenants
The representations, warranties and covenants of each party contained in this Agreement will survive Closing for a period of six months after the Closing Date.
8. INDEMNIFICATION
8.1 Indemnity
(a) | Subject to Section 8.2 hereto, the Vendor will indemnify and hold harmless the Purchaser and its affiliates and associates from and against any claim, loss, liability (including without limitation for income, capital withholding, stamp duty, excise or other taxes whatsoever or howsoever incurred), damage or expense (including reasonable legal fees) which the Purchaser and/or its affiliates, directly or indirectly, incur, suffer or otherwise become liable for by reason of, or which will result from, arise out of or be based, directly or indirectly upon: (i) the inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the Vendor hereunder; and (ii) the failure of the Vendor to comply with any covenant or agreement made by the Vendor hereunder; and | |
(b) | Subject to Section 8.2 hereto, the Purchaser will indemnify and hold harmless the Vendor from and against any claim, loss, liability, damage or expense (including reasonable legal fees) (each a "Vendor's Loss") which the Vendor will, directly or indirectly, incur or suffer by reason of, or which will result from, arise out of or be based upon: (i) the inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the Purchaser hereunder; or (ii) the failure of the Purchaser to comply with any covenant or agreement made by the Purchaser hereunder. |
8.2 Notice of Claim
Upon the occurrence of any event that a Party (the "Indemnified Party") asserts to be the basis for a claim for indemnification against the other Party (the "Indemnifying Party") under this Article 8 (a "Claim"), then the Indemnified Party shall promptly (and in any event within fifteen (15) Business Days after discovery of such Claim) give notice (a "Claim Notice") to the Indemnifying Party thereof in writing, in accordance with Section 9.2 below, which Claim Notice shall set forth (i) a particular description of the event or condition that is the basis for the Claim; (ii) whether the Claim arises as a result of a claim by a person against the Indemnified Party (a "Third Party Claim") or whether the Claim does not so arise (a "Direct Claim"); and (ii) the amount reasonably necessary to satisfy such Claim;provided,however, that no delay on the part of the Indemnified Party in notifying the Indemnifying Party shall relieve the Indemnifying Party from any obligation under this Agreement except to the extent the Indemnifying Party thereby is prejudiced.
8.3 Direct Claims
In the case of a Direct Claim, the Indemnifying Party shall have sixty (60) days from receipt of the Claim Notice within which to make such investigation of the Claim as the Indemnifying Party considers necessary or desirable. For the purpose of such investigation, the Indemnified Party shall make available to the Indemnifying Party the information relied upon by the Indemnified Party to substantiate the Claim, together with all such other information as the Indemnifying Party may reasonably request. If the Parties agree at or before the expiration of such sixty (60) day period (or any mutually agreed upon extension thereof) to the validity and amount of such Claim, the Indemnifying Party shall immediately pay to the Indemnified Party the full agreed upon amount of the Claim, failing which the matter shall be referred to binding arbitration in such manner as the Parties may agree or shall be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
10
8.4 Third Party Claims
In the case of a Third Party Claim, the Indemnifying Party shall have the right, at its expense, to participate in or assume control of the negotiation, settlement or defence of the Claim. If the Indemnifying Party elects to assume such control, the Indemnifying Party shall reimburse the Indemnified Party for all of the Indemnified Party's reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred up to the time of such participation or assumption by Indemnifying Party. The Indemnified Party shall have the right to participate in the negotiation, settlement or defence of such Third Party Claim and to retain counsel to act on its behalf, provided that the fees and disbursements of such counsel shall be paid by the Indemnified Party unless the Indemnifying Party consents to the retention of such counsel at its expense or unless the named parties to any action or proceeding include both the Indemnifying Party and the Indemnified Party and a representation of both the Indemnifying Party and the Indemnified Party by the same counsel would be inappropriate due to the actual or potential differing interests between them (such as the availability of different defences). The Indemnified Party shall cooperate with the Indemnifying Party so as to permit the Indemnifying Party to conduct such negotiation, settlement and defence and for this purpose shall preserve all relevant documents in relation to the Third Party Claim, allow the Indemnifying Party access on reasonable notice to inspect and take copies of all such documents and require its personnel to provide such statements as the Indemnifying Party may reasonably require and to attend and give evidence at any trial or hearing in respect of the Third Party Claim. If, having elected to assume control of the negotiation, settlement or defence of the Third Party Claim, the Indemnifying Party thereafter fails to conduct such negotiation, settlement or defence with reasonable diligence, then the Indemnified Party shall be entitled to assume such control and the Indemnifying Party shall be bound by the results obtained by the Indemnified Party with respect to such Third Party Claim. If any Third Party Claim is of a nature such that the Indemnified Party is required by applicable law or the order of any court, tribunal or regulatory body having jurisdiction to make a payment to any person (a "Third Party") with respect to the Third Party Claim before the completion of settlement negotiations or related legal proceedings, as the case may be, then the Indemnified Party may make such payment and the Indemnifying Party shall, promptly after demand by the Indemnified Party, reimburse the Indemnified Party for such payment.
8.5 Settlement of Third Party Claims
If the Indemnifying Party fails to assume control of the defense of any Third Party Claim, the Indemnified Party shall have the exclusive right to contest, settle or pay the amount claimed, subject to the written consent of the Indemnifying Party. Whether or not the Indemnifying Party assumes control of the negotiation, settlement or defense of any Third Party Claim, the Indemnifying Party shall not settle any Third Party Claim without the written consent of the Indemnified Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed; provided, however, that the liability of the Indemnifying Party shall be limited to the proposed settlement amount if any such consent is not obtained for any reason within a reasonable time after the request therefor.
8.6 Tax Adjustments
(a) | The amount of any Claim submitted under this Article 8 as damages or by way of indemnification shall be determined on an after-tax basis, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing shall: | ||
(i) be net of the present value of any tax benefits to the Indemnified Party resulting from the claim for indemnity and indemnification; and |
11
(ii) include the amount necessary to hold the Indemnified Party harmless after tax; and the present value of any tax benefits shall be the amount, calculated on the date that is the Business Day immediately preceding the date of payment of the Claim, that is required to provide a yield from such date to the last day of the latest taxation year of the Indemnified Party to which the tax benefits relate that is equal to the sum of the yield to maturity on such date, assuming semi-annual compounding, that a non-callable Government of Canada bond would carry if issued in Canadian dollars in Canada at 100% of its principal amount on such date and maturing approximately on the last day of the latest taxation year of the Indemnified Party to which the tax benefits relate.
(b) | The amount of any Claim submitted under this Article 8 as damages or by way of indemnification as determined without regard to this Section 8.6 shall be increased, if said amount is taxable according to applicable legislation, by an amount equal to the rate of goods and services tax (or similar tax) applied to such amount. |
8.7 Benefit of Insurance
The amount which an Indemnifying Party is required to pay to any Indemnified Party in respect of a Claim shall be limited to the amount of liability that remains after deducting there from the amount of any insurance proceeds, indemnity, contribution or similar payment otherwise actually received by the Indemnified Party in respect of such Claim. If an Indemnified Party shall have received an indemnity payment in respect of a Claim and shall subsequently receive any insurance proceeds, indemnity, contribution or similar payment in respect of such Claim, then such Indemnified Party shall pay to the Indemnifying Party an amount equal to the lesser of such amount received or the amount of the indemnity payment.
9. GENERAL PROVISIONS
9.1 Termination
If the Closing does not occur on or before ____________, 2010, either Party may, upon notice to the other Party, terminate this Agreement with immediate effect.
9.2 Notices
Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by facsimile or other means of electronic communication or by hand-delivery as hereinafter provided. Any such notice, if sent by facsimile or other means of electronic communication, shall be deemed to have been received on the day of sending, or if delivered by hand shall be deemed to have been received at the time it is delivered to the applicable address noted below. Notice of change of address shall also be governed by this section. Notices and other communications shall be addressed as follows:
(a) | if to the Purchaser : | |
Perry Law | ||
10-11720 Voyageur Way | ||
(b) | if to the Vendor: | |
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS, INC. |
12
9.3 Entire Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes every previous agreement, communication, expectation, negotiation, representation or understanding, whether oral or written, express or implied, statutory or otherwise, among the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement except as specifically set out herein. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the terms and conditions of any document ancillary hereto, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail.
9.4 Waiver and Consent
No consent or waiver, express or implied, by any Party to or of any breach or default by another Party of any or all of its obligations under this Agreement will be valid unless it is in writing, nor will it eliminate or modify the need for a specific consent or waiver in any other or subsequent instance.
9.5 Amendments
This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement among all the parties to this Agreement.
9.6 Assignments
No Party may assign any right, benefit or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other Party, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld.
9.7 Binding Effect
This Agreement will enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.
9.8 Time of Essence
Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
9.9 No Adverse Interpretation of Other Agreements
This Agreement may not be used to interpret any other indenture, loan, note or other agreement of the Parties hereto or any other person. Any such other indenture, loan, note or other agreement may not be used to interpret this Agreement.
9.10 No Recourse Against Others
No director, trustee, officer, employee, incorporator or stockholder of any Party or any of their respective affiliates, as such, will have any liability or obligations to any other Party hereunder or for any claim based on, in respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their creation hereunder. Each Party waives and releases all such liability and such waiver and release form part of the consideration for this Agreement.
13
9.11 Costs and Expenses
All costs and expenses of or incidental to the transactions contemplated in this Agreement are to be assumed and paid by the Party incurring such costs and expenses.
9.12 Further Assurances
Each Party will, at its own expense, execute and deliver all such further agreements and documents and do such further acts and things as may be reasonably required to give effect to this Agreement.
9.13 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties had signed the same document. All counterparts will constitute one and the same agreement. This Agreement may be executed and transmitted by facsimile transmission and if so executed and transmitted this Agreement will be for all purposes as effective as if the parties had delivered an executed original Agreement.
9.14 Severability
Should any part of this Agreement be declared or held invalid for any reason, that invalidity will not affect the validity of the remainder which will continue in force and effect and be construed as if this Agreement had been executed without the invalid portion and it is hereby declared the intention of the Parties hereto that this Agreement would have been executed without reference to any portion which may, for any reason, be hereafter declared or held invalid.
IN WITNESS WHEREOFthe Parties hereto have executed this Agreement with effect as of the day and year first above written.
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC. | SMART-TEK Communications, Inc. |
By:/s/Brian Bonar | By:Perry Law |
Brian Bonar | Perry Law |
Title: CEO, Director | Title: President |
14
SCHEDULE A
FORM OF PURCHASER RELEASE
RELEASE AND DISCHARGE
Perry Law(the "Releasor"), for and in consideration of the premises set out in the share purchase agreement between the Releasor andSmart-Tek Solutions Inc.("STS") of April 1, 2010 (the "Share Purchase Agreement") and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged), subject to the terms and conditions set out herein, by these presents, hereby, on its own behalf and on behalf of its affiliates (as defined in the Share Purchase Agreement) and associates, REMISES, RELEASES AND FOREVER DISCHARGES STS, its directors, officers and advisors, its affiliates, associates, subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers and advisors (collectively, the "Releasees") and their respective successors and assigns, of and from all manners of action, causes of action, suits, contracts, claims, demands, costs and expenses of any nature or kind whatsoever (each a "Claim"), which against the Releasees, the Releasor ever had, now has or hereinafter can, shall or may have by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever existing up to the present time, other than the rights and obligations of the parties under the Share Purchase Agreement and the agreements ancillary thereto (the "Excluded Claims"), all of which Excluded Claims are specifically excluded from this Release and Discharge.
IT IS DISTINCTLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the Releasor shall not commence any further proceedings against the Releasees with respect to the Claims and shall discontinue against the Releasees any existing proceedings commenced by the Releasor to which any Releasees is a defendant on a without cost basis.
IT IS DISTINCTLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the Releasor shall indemnify and hold the Releasees harmless in respect of any Claim brought against a Releasee by an affiliate or associate of the Releasor.
IT IS FURTHER DISTINCTLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the above consideration is accepted voluntarily for the purpose of making full and final compromise, adjustment and settlement of all claims or potential claims between the Releasor and the Releasees as provided herein and this Release and Discharge shall not be construed as an admission of liability on the part of the Releasees.
IT IS FURTHER DISTINCTLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED and the Releasor acknowledges that facts in respect of which this Release and Discharge is made may prove to be other than or different from the facts in that are now known or believed by the Releasor to be true. The Releasor accepts and assumes the risk of the facts being different and agrees that this Release and Discharge shall be in all respects enforceable and not subject to termination, rescission or variation by a discovery of any difference in facts.
IT IS FURTHER DISTINCTLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED and the Releasor hereby acknowledges and agrees that with respect to this Release and Discharge, STS is contracting on both its own behalf and as trustee for the other Releasees (collectively, the “Release Beneficiaries”) and therefore all of the Releasor’s obligations, covenants, responsibilities, indemnities and agreements under this Release and Discharge shall also be directly and independently enforceable by, and constitute direct and independent obligations vis-à-vis, each of the Release Beneficiaries. STS has accepted these trusts and will hold and enforce the obligations, covenants, responsibilities, indemnities and agreements of the Releasor under this Release and Discharge on behalf of the Release Beneficiaries and the Releasor acknowledges and agrees that the obligations, covenants, responsibilities, indemnities and agreements granted by it under this Release and Discharge shall be enforceable by STS both in its own right and as trustee on behalf of the Release Beneficiaries.
15
IT IS FURTHER DISTINCTLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the Releasor has read this Release and Discharge and, prior to the execution hereof, obtained independent legal advice in respect hereof and confirms that the terms of this Release and Discharge are contractual and not a mere recital.
IT IS FURTHER DISTINCTLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that capitalized terms used in this Release and Discharge, and not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Share Purchase Agreement.
THIS RELEASE AND DISCHARGE is governed by and shall be interpreted pursuant to the laws of the Province of British Columbia and the laws of Canada applicable therein. The parties hereto hereby irrevocably submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of British Columbia, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Release and Discharge and hereby irrevocably agree that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in such court, and that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law.
THIS RELEASE AND DISCHARGE may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties had signed the same document. All counterparts will constitute one and the same agreement. This Release and Discharge may be executed and transmitted by facsimile transmission and if so executed and transmitted this Release and Discharge will be for all purposes as effective as if the parties had delivered an executed original Release and Discharge.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Releasor has hereunto executed this Release and Discharge effective the 1st day of April, 2010.
/S/ BRIAN BONAR
BRIAN BONAR
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC.
/S/ PERRY LAW
PERRY LAW
SMART-TEK COMMUNICATIONS INC.
APPENDIX C
DECEMBER 2009 FORM 10Q
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
December 31, 2009 and 2008
PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
CONTENTS | PAGES |
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | F-2 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss | F-3 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency | F-4 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | F-5 |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | F-6 - F-17 |
F-1
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As at December 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2009
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||
(unaudited) | ||||||
Assets | ||||||
Current assets | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 511,996 | $ | 73,272 | ||
Accounts receivable | 978,029 | 639,284 | ||||
Contract retention receivable | 344,256 | 235,196 | ||||
Cost of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings | 210,207 | 37,097 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and deposits | 1,631,261 | 1,376 | ||||
Total current assets | 3,675,749 | 986,225 | ||||
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation | 84,437 | 15,122 | ||||
Goodwill | 451,311 | 451,311 | ||||
$ | 4,211,497 | $ | 1,452,658 | |||
Liabilities | ||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 2,251,785 | $ | 408,365 | ||
Bonus payable | 456,720 | 240,744 | ||||
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated revenues | 88,166 | 297,600 | ||||
Deferred revenue | 12,042 | 12,389 | ||||
Loans payable | - | 310,265 | ||||
Shareholder loans | 821,756 | 625,392 | ||||
Amounts due to officers and directors | 712,620 | 400,172 | ||||
Total current liabilities | 4,343,089 | 2,294,927 | ||||
Stockholders’ Deficiency | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, one (1) shares of Class A preferred issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 | - | - | ||||
Common stock: $0.001 par value, 500,000,000, shares authorized, | ||||||
69,314,124 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 447,589 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 respectively | 69,314 | 448 | ||||
Additional paid in capital | 6,852,863 | 6,566,464 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (96,396 | ) | (67,722 | ) | ||
Accumulated deficit | (6,957,373 | ) | (7,341,459 | ) | ||
Total stockholders’ deficiency | (131,592 | ) | (842,269 | ) | ||
$ | 4,211,497 | $ | 1,452,658 | |||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Unaudited)
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Revenue | ||||||||||||
Contract revenue | $ | 3,184,189 | $ | 832,816 | $ | 4,994,782 | $ | 1,710,850 | ||||
Services revenue | - | 15,075 | 11,706 | 33,191 | ||||||||
Other revenue | - | 239 | 341 | 510 | ||||||||
Total revenue | 3,184,189 | 848,130 | 5,006,829 | 1,744,551 | ||||||||
Cost of revenue and service delivery | 2,320,051 | 465,392 | 3,517,331 | 1,241,907 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 864,138 | 382,738 | 1,489,498 | 502,644 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 313,721 | 386,700 | 1,101,744 | 540,420 | ||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 550,417 | (3,962 | ) | 387,754 | (37,776 | ) | ||||||
Other expense Interest | (1,731 | ) | (1,146 | ) | (3,668 | ) | (2,835 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) | 548,686 | (5,108 | ) | 384,086 | (40,611 | ) | ||||||
Currency translation adjustment | 2,283 | 60,441 | (28,674 | ) | 70,891 | |||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 550,969 | $ | 55,333 | 355,412 | 30,280 | ||||||
Earnings per share, basic and diluted | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 19,712,944 | 111,812,971 | 19,712,944 | 111,812,971 |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency
Six months ended December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||
Paid in | Comprehensive | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Income | Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance – June 30, 2008 | 447,589 | $ | 448 | $ | 6,533,964 | $ | (121,568 | ) | $ | (7,205,092 | ) | $ | (792,248 | ) | ||||
Fair Value Options issued to employees | - | - | 32,500 | - | - | 32,500 | ||||||||||||
Net Loss | - | - | - | - | (136,367 | ) | (136,367 | ) | ||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment | - | - | - | 53,846 | - | 53,846 | ||||||||||||
Balance – June 30, 2009 | 447,589 | $ | 448 | $ | 6,566,464 | $ | (67,722 | ) | $ | (7,341,459 | ) | $ | (842,269 | ) | ||||
Shares issued for Marketing Partner Agreement | 45,000,000 | 45,000 | - | - | - | 45,000 | ||||||||||||
Shares issued for debt | 23,866,535 | 23,866 | 286,399 | - | - | 310,265 | ||||||||||||
Net Income | - | - | - | - | 384,086 | 384,086 | ||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment | - | - | - | (28,674 | ) | - | (28,674 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance – December 31, 2009 | 69,314,124 | 69,314 | 6,852,863 | (96,396 | ) | (6,957,373 | ) | (131,592 | ) |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
Ended | Ended December | Ended December | December 31, | |||||||||
December 31, 2009 | 31, 2008 | 31, 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Operating Activities | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 548,686 | $ | (5,108 | ) | $ | 384,086 | $ | (40,611 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash used in operating activities | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,671 | 338 | 7,942 | 737 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | - | 16,250 | - | 32,500 | ||||||||
Marketing Partner Agreement | - | - | 45,000 | - | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (256,970 | ) | (9,668 | ) | (338,745 | ) | 175,239 | |||||
Contract retention receivable | 14,093 | 29,744 | (109,060 | ) | 33,947 | |||||||
Costs of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings | (159,950 | ) | (267,762 | ) | (173,110 | ) | (252,297 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and deposits | (1,629,673 | ) | 196 | (1,629,885 | ) | 255 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 1,747,883 | (64,157 | ) | 1,843,420 | (127,094 | ) | ||||||
Bonus payable | (253,120 | ) | (31,605 | ) | 215,976 | (41,203 | ) | |||||
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated revenues | (36,502 | ) | 77,228 | (209,434 | ) | 28,628 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | (953 | ) | (555 | ) | (347 | ) | (351 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (21,835 | ) | (255,099 | ) | 35,843 | (190,250 | ) | |||||
Investing activities | ||||||||||||
Purchase of equipment | (14,751 | ) | - | (77,257 | ) | (6,158 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (14,751 | ) | - | (77,257 | ) | (6,158 | ) | |||||
Financing activities | ||||||||||||
(Decrease) Increase in bank overdraft | - | 28,706 | - | (33,471 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from shareholder loan | - | - | 196,364 | 5,837 | ||||||||
Proceeds from officers and directors | 276,830 | 159,551 | 312,448 | 144,806 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 276,830 | 188,257 | 508,812 | 117,172 | ||||||||
Effects of exchange rates on cash | 2,283 | 60,441 | (28,674 | ) | 70,891 | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 242,527 | (6,401 | ) | 438,724 | (8,345 | ) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 269,469 | 49,301 | 73,272 | 51,245 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 511,996 | $ | 42,900 | $ | 511,996 | 42,900 | |||||
Supplemental cash flow information | ||||||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 1,731 | $ | 2,835 | $ | 3,668 | $ | 2,835 |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
Nature of operations, basis of financial statement presentation
In August 2005, the Company changed its name from Royce Biomedical Inc. to Smart-tek Solutions Inc. (“STS” or the “Company”) to better reflect its new business activities. STS was incorporated in Nevada on March 22, 1995.
Between August 1995 and June 1998, the Company manufactured and sold diagnostic test kits used to detect pregnancy, thyroid disorders and other medical conditions. The Company assembled its diagnostic testing kits at its laboratory in Irvine, California. The Company closed this facility in April 1998. In order to penetrate the Chinese Immunodiagnostic market quickly, the Company signed an agreement in April 1999 with Xili Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. (“Xili”) of the People’s Republic of China, to market and distribute H. Pylori Diagnostic test kits supplied by the Company. In addition to supplying H. Pylori diagnostic test kits supplied by the Company. In addition to supplying H. Pylori test kits to Xili, the Company had provided clinical data and training to Xili personnel.
Xili Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. through its subsidiary, Xili USA, Inc. owned approximately 44% of the outstanding common shares of the Company through December 5, 2004 and is controlled by Dr. Yan Xiao Wen, who is also the former Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. At December 31, 2007, Xili USA, Inc., owns approximately 2.1% of the outstanding common shares of the Company.
In March 2005, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent to acquire Smart-tek Communications, Inc. (“SCI”) a British Columbia based security design and installation contractor. Pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement executed in April 2005. SCI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. As a result of this acquisition, the Company has ceased all ongoing business relationships with Xili and will direct its efforts to effectively operate and expand in the security sector.
Pursuant to the share exchange agreement, the Company issued 1,000 shares of its common stock and 1 share of Class A preferred stock in return for all outstanding shares of SCI. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase (see Note 2).
Smart-tek Communications Inc. (“SCI”) was incorporated on October 29, 1996 in the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Company specializes in the design, sale, installation and service of security technology with electronic hardware and software products. Projects range from residential and commercial developments to system upgrades and monitoring contracts. Customers include major developers, general and electrical contractors, hospitals, Crown Corporations, law enforcement agencies and retail facilities. Currently, 100% of the Company’s operations are in Canada.
On February 11, 2009, Smart-tek Automated Services Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada. Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. will provide integrated and cost-effective management solutions in the area of human resources for public and private companies.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the following significant accounting policies:
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Smart-tek Solutions Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Smart-tek Communications Inc. and Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. Significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Accounts Receivable
The Company reports accounts receivable at net realizable value. The Company’s term of sale provide the basis for when accounts become delinquent or past due. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts, when necessary, equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. There is an allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2009 of $4,283 (2008 – $8,270).
F-6
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
Equipment
Equipment, including computer equipment under capital lease agreements, is recorded at cost and depreciated using accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from 3 to 5 years. The Company reviews the carrying value of long-term assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant such a review. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred. Major overhaul that extends the useful life of existing assets is capitalized. When equipment is retired or disposed, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated and the resulting profit or loss is recognized in income.
Financial instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, contract retention receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, bonus payable, shareholder loans and amounts due to officers and directors. The fair value of these financial instruments approximate their carrying value due to the short maturities of these instruments, unless otherwise noted.
Interest rate risk arises on the various rates at which the Company has obtained certain long-term debts. However, the Company expects to repay these obligations in full either at maturity or at terms set out in the specific agreements. Consequently, risk related to fluctuations on the bank prime is minimal. The remaining balance of long-term debt are based on fixed terms of interest. The Company expects to repay these amounts in full, thereby minimizing interest rate risk.
Cash and equivalents
Cash and equivalents include investments with initial maturities of three months or less.
Income taxes
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes, including recognition of deferred tax assets for the anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement amounts and their respective tax bases. The Company reviews its deferred tax asset for recovery and a valuation allowance is established when the Company believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the Company’s tax provision in the period of change (see Note 8).
Goodwill and intangible assets
The Company accounts for goodwill and intangible assets pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Under SFAS 142, intangibles with definite lives continue to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or contractual terms. Goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated at least annually for impairment by comparing the asset’s estimated fair values with its carrying value, based on cash flow methodology.
Use of estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Specific areas, among others, requiring the application of management’s estimates and judgment includes assumptions pertaining to credit. Worthiness of customers, percentage of completion and related costs for contracts in progress, interest rates, useful lives of assets, future cost trends, tax strategies, and other external market and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from estimates and assumptions made.
F-7
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
Revenue recognition
The Company accounts for its construction projects using the percentage of completion method, measured using the cost-to-cost method. This method of accounting requires a calculation of job profit to be recognized in each reporting period for each contract abased upon estimates of future outcomes, which include:
- Estimates of total cost to complete the contract;
- Estimates of contract schedule and completion date;
- Estimates of the percentage the contract is complete; and
- Amounts of any probable unapproved claims and change orders included in revenue.
At the outset of each contract, a detailed analysis of estimated cost to complete the contract is prepared. Periodically, evaluation of the estimated cost, claims, change orders and percentage of completion at the project level will be performed. The recording of profits and losses on long-term contracts requires an estimate of the total profit and loss over the life of each contract. This estimate requires consideration of contract revenues, change orders and claims, less cost incurred and estimated costs to complete. Anticipated losses on contracts are recorded in full in the period in which they become evident. Profits are recorded based upon the total estimated contract profit times the current percentage of completion for the contract.
When calculating the amount of total profit or loss on a long-term contract, unapproved claims are recorded as revenue when collection is deemed probable based upon the four criteria for recognizing unapproved claims under the AICPA Statement of Position 81-1 (“SOP 81-1”) Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and Certain Production Type Contracts. The Company is actively engaged in claims negotiations with customers and the success of the claims negotiations have a direct impact on the profit or loss recorded for any long-term contract. On a quarterly basis, significant contracts are reviewed. However, there are many factors that impact future costs, including but not limited to, weather, inflation, labor and community disruptions, timely availability of materials, productivity and other factors. These factors can affect the accuracy of our estimates and materially impact our future earnings.
The company also provides various other services to customers not covered under construction contracts such as equipment repairs. The revenue from the provision of these types of services is recorded once the specific job is complete.
The Company recognizes professional employment organizations (PEO) revenues when each periodic payroll is delivered to the client. Revenues are reported in accordance with the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 99-19,“Reporting Revenues Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent.” (EITF 99-19). Consistent with its revenue recognition policy, the Company’s net PEO revenues and cost of PEO revenues do not include the payroll cost of its worksite employees. Instead, PEO revenues and cost of PEO revenues are comprised of all other costs related to its worksite employees, such as payroll taxes, employee benefit plan premiums and workers’ compensation insurance. PEO revenues also include professional service fees, which are primarily computed as a percentage of client payroll or on a per check basis.
In determining the pricing of the markup component of its billings, the Company takes into consideration its estimates of the costs directly associated with its worksite employees, including payroll taxes, benefits and workers’ compensation costs, plus an acceptable gross profit margin. As a result, the Company’s operating results are significantly impacted by the Company’s ability to accurately estimate, control and manage its direct costs relative to the revenues derived from the markup component of the Company’s gross billings.
Concentration of credit risk
Credit risk arises from the potential that a counterpart will fail to perform its obligations. The Company is exposed to credit risk related to its account receivable and contract retention receivable. The Company’s receivables are comprised of a number of debtors which minimizes the concentration of credit risk. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk associated with its accounts receivable and contract retention receivable.
F-8
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
Foreign currency translation
The functional currency of the Company is the United States dollar. The Company’s Canadian subsidiary’s financial statements are translated into United States dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and at average rates for the period for revenues and expenses. Resulting exchange differences are accumulated as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Comprehensive (loss) income
Comprehensive income or loss encompasses net income or loss and “other comprehensive income or loss”, which includes all other non-owner transactions and events that change shareholder’s deficiency. The Company’s other comprehensive loss reflects the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments on the translation of the financial statements from the functional currency of Canadian dollars into the reporting currency of U.S. dollars.
Stock-based compensation
Through December 31, 2005, the Company accounted for stock-based employee compensation in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” and complied with the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 (as modified by SFAS No.48), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, Under APB No.25 compensation expense was recorded based on difference, if any, between the fair value of the Company’s stock and the exercise price on the measurement date. The Company accounted for stock issued to non-employees in accordance with SFAS No.123, which required entities to recognize as expense over the service period the fair value of all stock based awards on the date of grant and EITF No. 96-18 “Accounting for Equity Investments that are issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”, which addressed the measurement date and recognition approach for such transactions.
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-based Payment (“SFAS No.123R”) a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation”, SFAS No.123R superseded APB Opinion No.25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amended SFAS 95 “Statement of Cash Flows” SFAS No 123R requires that the Company measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant date fair-value of the awards. The cost will be recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards.
Under this method, the Company began recognizing compensation cost for equity-based compensation for all new or modified grants after the date of adoption. The pro-forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition.
In addition, the Company now recognizes the unvested portion of the grant date fair value of awards issued prior to adoption based on the fair values previously calculated for disclosure purposes over the remaining vesting period of the outstanding options and warrants. Accordingly, the Company recognizes compensation cost for equity-based compensation for all new or modified grants issued after December 31, 2005.
The Company had two partially vested stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005 pursuant to employment agreements entered into between the Company’s and its president and vice-president. Under these agreements, the Company issued options to purchase up to 650,000 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.15 per share that vest in equal quarterly installments over a three (3) year period. The Company calculated the fair value of the options to be 195,000 using our option pricing model which was recognized as expense prior to the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
In addition, commencing January 1, 2006, the Company is required to recognize the unvested portion of the grant date fair value of awards issued prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R based on the fair values previously calculated for disclosure purposes over the remaining vesting period of the outstanding stock options and warrants. At December 31, 2009, the value of the unvested options was $Nil.
F-9
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
Recovery of long-lived assets
The Company adopted SFAS Statement 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”). SFAS 144 requires recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts.
Advertising expenses
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred which was $65 for the period ended December 31, 2009.
Earnings per share
The Company computes net earnings (loss) per common share in accordance with SFAS No. 128 “Earnings per Share” (“SFAS 128”) and SAB No. 98 (“SAB 98”). Under the provisions of SFAS 128 and SAB 98, the basic net earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) available to common stock outstanding during the period. Net earnings (loss) per share on a diluted basis is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to July 1, 2009, for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The Company believes the adoption of the delayed items of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which established general accounting standards and disclosure for subsequent events. In accordance with SFAS No. 165, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were filed.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 -- The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the single source of authoritative US generally accepted accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 168 will not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has net income of $384,086 and cash flow from operations of $35,843 during the period ended December 31, 2009, and had a working capital deficiency of $667,340 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $131,592. These matters raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management believes that actions are presently being taken to revise the Company’s operating results. Management believes that the Company will have adequate cash to fund anticipated needs through June 30, 2010 and beyond primarily as a result of our contract backlog. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The Company does not have any significant available credit, bank financing or other external sources of liquidity. Due to historical operating losses, the Company’s operations have not been a source of liquidity and the Company has satisfied its cash requirements through shareholder loans and deferral of salary payments to its officers. In order to obtain necessary capital, the Company may need to sell additional shares of its common stock or borrow funds from private lenders. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to secure additional financing or that it can be secured at rates acceptable to the Company. In addition, should the Company be required to either issue stock for services or to secure equity funding, due to the lack of liquidity in the market for the Company’s stock such financing would result in significant dilution to its existing shareholders.
F-10
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
2. Acquisitions
On April 15, 2005, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with Smart-tek Communications, Inc. (“SCI”) and with the sole shareholder of SCI to acquire all of the outstanding shares of SCI.
In exchange for the SCI shares, the Company issued to SCI’s shareholder, 1,000 common shares and 1 Class A Preferred Share of the Company. The preferred share will enable the holder to exercise the voting control over 40% of the Company upon issuance. The remaining 60% voting control is to be assigned to the outstanding common shares of the Company. Such preferred shares shall not be convertible, exchangeable, transferable or otherwise purchased, conveyed or redeemed at any time while outstanding during a two-year period. In addition, the voting power of such preferred share shall decrease over a two year period so as to have 20% voting control 12 months after issuance, 10% voting control over 18 months after issuance and zero voting control 24 months after issuance at which time the preferred shares will be redeemed for no consideration.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and the results of SCI’s operations beginning April 16, 2005 are included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The acquisition of assets and liabilities has been recorded at their fair market value at the date of purchase. The Company determined that the historical cost of the assets and liabilities acquired approximated their fair market values given the nature of the assets and liabilities acquired. Purchase price allocation was as follows:
Valuation of shares of common stock and preferred stock | $ | 1 | |
Assets acquired | 276,012 | ||
Liabilities assumed | (727,324 | ) | |
451,312 | |||
Goodwill | $ | 451,311 |
3. Contract Retention Receivable
Under the Builder’s Lien Act (British Columbia), under which the subsidiary SCI operates, for each contract or subcontract a holdback amount is retained by the customer equal to 10% of the greater of:
(a) | The value of the work or materials as they are actually provided under contract or subcontract, and | |
(b) | The amount of any payment made on account of the contract or subcontract price. |
On the request of a contractor or subcontractor, the payment certifier must, within 10 days after the date of the request, determine whether the contract or subcontract has been completed and, if the payment certifier determines that it has been completed, the payment certifier must issue a certificate of completion.
If a certificate of completion is issued with respect to a contract or subcontract, the holdback period expires at the end of 55 days after the certificate of completion is issued.
As of December 31, 2009 and June 30 2009, contract retention receivables were $344,256 and $235,196 respectively.
F-11
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
4. Equipment
December 31 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | 2009 | Accumulated | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Depreciation | Net Book | Cost | Depreciation | Net Book | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | |||||||||||||||||
Computer equipment & software | $ | 22,020 | $ | 3,293 | $ | 18,727 | $ | 899 | $ | 762 | $ | 137 | ||||||
Office furniture & equipment | 26,270 | 5,228 | 21,042 | 13,202 | 3,885 | 9,317 | ||||||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 15,617 | 15,617 | - | 15,617 | 15,617 | - | ||||||||||||
Computer equipment under capital lease | 2,140 | 1,843 | 297 | 2,140 | 1,791 | 349 | ||||||||||||
Automobile | 49,226 | 4,855 | 44,371 | 6,158 | 839 | 5,319 | ||||||||||||
$ | 115,273 | $ | 30,836 | $ | 84,437 | $ | 38,016 | $ | 22,894 | $ | 15,122 |
5. Bank Overdraft
At December 31, 2009, bank overdrafts covered by a revolving line of credit were $Nil. The revolving line of credit agreement is between SCI, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, and HSBC Bank of Canada. The revolving line of credit facility bears interest at the rate of prime plus 4.50% per annum, allows authorized bank overdrafts of up to $118,938 ($125,000 CDN) and is secured by a shareholder guarantee and $50,195 ($52,754 CDN) in the form of a term deposit. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had written checks of $Nil in excess of the operating line of credit.
Pursuant to the banking facility, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is required to maintain minimum equity of $95,150 (CDN$100,000). The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is not in compliance with this condition at December 31, 2009.
6. Shareholder loans
At December 31, 2009 the Company is indebted to a company controlled by the Company’s president in the amount of $821,756. The loan is unsecured, bears 7.5% interest and has no fixed terms of repayment.
7. Loans payable
At December 31, 2009, the Company has outstanding loans payable in the amount of $Nil (June 30, 2009 – $310,265).
8. Income taxes
The Company utilizes SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Deferred income taxes are reported using the liabilities method.
Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and for carry forwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
F-12
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
8. Income taxes, continued
The Company generated a deferred tax credit through net operating loss carry forwards. As of June 30, 2009 the company had federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $6,981,146 that can be used to offset future federal income tax. The federal and state net operating losses are reduced by a valuation allowance, when, in the opinion of management, utilization is not reasonably assured. A valuation allowance of 100% has been established; based on it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax credit will not be realized.
At June 30, 2009, STS had available federal net operating loss (NOL)carry forwards of approximately $6,992,146. Under Section 382 of the internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the use of prior losses including NOLs is subject to rules if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change”. Future issuances of equity interests by us for acquisitions or the exercise of outstanding options to purchase our capital stock may result in an ownership change that is large enough for a limitation on the use of NOLs to apply. If the limitation applies, we may be unable to use a material portion of its available NOL carry forwards to reduce future taxable income. The income tax effect of temporary differences between financial and tax reporting gives rise to the deferred tax asset at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 as follows:
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||
Deferred tax asset, beginning | $ | 2,402,420 | $ | 2,409,732 | ||
Benefit (provision )of current year’s operating loss carry forward (gain) | (134,430 | ) | (7,312 | ) | ||
Deferred tax asset, ending | $ | 2,267,990 | $ | 2,402,420 | ||
Valuation allowance, beginning | $ | (2,402,420 | ) | $ | (2,409,732 | ) |
Current year’s loss carry forward (provision) | 134,430 | (7,312 | ) | |||
Valuation allowance, ending | $ | (2,267,990 | ) | $ | (2,402,420 | ) |
Deferred tax asset, net | $ | - | $ | - | ||
Tax at blended U.S./Canadian statutory rates | (35% | ) | (35% | ) | ||
Loss carryover | 35% | 35% | ||||
Tax expense | $ | - | $ | - |
9. Common Stock
At December 31, 2009, the Company is authorized to issue:
1. | 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share | |
2. | 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share |
At December 31, 2009, there are 69,314,124 shares of common stock outstanding.
During the period, the Company issued 45,000,000 common stock of the Company to Brian Bonar, a director of the Company based on the achievement certain milestone targets for annualized sales as set out in the Marketing Partner Agreement dated June 17, 2009.
During the period, the Company issued 23,866,535 common stock of the Company for the settlement of debt.
F-13
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
9. Common Stock continued
Preferred Stock
Pursuant to the share exchange agreement dated April 15, 2005, the Company agreed to issue one share of Class A preferred stock to the sole shareholder of SCI, Perry Law. The preferred share will enable the holder to exercise the voting control of 40% of the Company upon issuance. The remaining 60% voting control is to be assigned to the outstanding common shares of the Company. Such preferred shares shall not be convertible, exchangeable, transferable or otherwise purchased, conveyed or redeemed at any time while outstanding during a two-year period. In addition, the voting power of such preferred share shall decrease over such two-year period so as to have 20% voting control 12 months after issuance, 10% voting control 18 months after issuance and zero voting control 24 months after issuance, at which time the preferred share will be redeemed by the Company for no consideration.
2005 Stock Incentive Plan
During fiscal 2005, pursuant to provisions under the plans, the Company’s Board of Directors cancelled all existing stock option and incentive plans.
The following description applies to the stock incentive plan that was subsequently adopted on May 27, 2005; 1,300,000 options have been granted under this plan as of the date of this filing.
We have reserved for issuance an aggregate of 25,000,000 shares of common stock under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. This plan is intended to encourage directors, officers, employees and consultants to acquire ownership of common stock. The opportunity so provided is intended to foster in participants a strong incentive to put forth maximum effort for our continued success and growth, to aid in retaining individuals who put forth such efforts, and to assist in attracting the best available individuals to the Company in the future.
Officers (including officers who are members of the board of directors), directors and other employees and consultants of STS and its subsidiaries will be eligible to receive options under the stock incentive plan. The committee will administer the stock incentive plan and will determine those persons to whom options will be granted, the number of options to be granted, the provisions applicable to each grant and the time periods during which the options may be exercised. No options may be granted more than ten years after the date of the adoption of the stock incentive plan.
Non-qualified stock options will be granted by the committee with an option price equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock to which the non-qualified stock option relates on the date of grant. The committee may, in its discretion, determine to price the non-qualified option at a different price. In no event may the option price with respect to an incentive stock option granted under the stock option plan be less than the fair market value of such common stock to which the incentive stock option relates on the date the incentive stock option is granted.
Each option granted under the stock incentive plan will be exercisable for a term of not more than ten years after the date of grant. Certain other restrictions will apply in connection with this plan when some awards may be exercised. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the stock incentive plan); the date on which all options outstanding under the stock incentive plan may first be exercised will be accelerated. Generally, all options terminate 90 days after a change of control.
F-14
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
9. Common Stock, continued
2005 Stock Incentive Plan, continued
At December 31, 2009, options outstanding are as follows:
Average | ||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||
Balance at July 1, 2009 | 1,300,000 | $ 0.15 | ||||
Granted | - | - | ||||
Exercised | - | - | ||||
Cancelled | - | - | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | 1,300,000 | $ 0.15 |
Additional information regarding options outstanding as of June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||
remaining | average | average | |||||||||||||
Exercise | Number | contractual life | exercise | exercise | |||||||||||
price | outstanding | (years) | price | Number | price | ||||||||||
$ 0.15 | 1,300,000 | 8.00 | $ | 0.15 | 1,300,000 | $ | 0.15 |
The Company had two partially vested stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005 pursuant to employment agreements entered into between the Company's and its president and vice-president. Under these agreements, the Company issued options to purchase up to 650,000 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.15 per share that vest in equal quarterly installments over a three (3) year period. The Company calculated the fair value of the options to be $195,000 using an option pricing model, of which $32,500 was recognized as expense during the year ended June 30, 2009.
In addition, commencing January 1, 2006, the Company is required to recognize the unvested portion of the grant date fair value of awards issued prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R based on the fair values previously calculated for disclosure purposes over the remaining vesting period of the outstanding stock options and warrants. At December 31, 2009, the value of the unvested options was $Nil.
10. Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
December 31, | June 30, | |||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts | $ | 2,293,591 | $ | 1,225,215 | ||
Estimated earnings | 2,009,284 | 746,096 | ||||
4,302,875 | 1,971,311 | |||||
Less: Billings to Date | (4,180,834 | ) | (2,231,814 | ) | ||
$ | 122,041 | $ | (260,503 | ) | ||
Included in accompanying balance sheets under the following captions: | ||||||
Costs of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings | $ | 210207 | $ | 37,097 | ||
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated revenues | (88,166 | ) | (297,600 | ) | ||
$ | (122,040 | ) | $ | (260,503 | ) |
F-15
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
11. Related Party Transactions
During the period ended December 31, 2009, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary paid $507,866 in management salaries to its President and Vice president which included bonuses of $445,536. Consulting fees of $46,982 were also incurred during the period. Such costs have been reflected in the accompanying statement of operations.
Amounts due to officers and directors were $821,756 as of December 31, 2009.
12. Commitments
Operating leases
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Smart-tek Communications Inc. entered into a non-cancellable operating lease for office space on March 1, 2008. Furthermore, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary is committed to operating leases for four company vehicles up to April 2014. The minimum payments required under these operating leases for each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2009 are approximately as follows:
Year ending | |
June 30 | |
2010 | 15,445 |
2011 | 24,208 |
2012 | 19,064 |
2013 | 9,108 |
2014 | 7,211 |
Employment agreements
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Smart-tek Communications Inc. has annual employment agreements with the president and vice-president and is committed to pay each of them annual salaries of $139,230 (CDN$150,000) along with annual car allowances of $13,923 (CDN$15,000).
Marketing partner agreement
By agreement dated June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Marketing Partner Agreement with its wholly owned subsidiary, Smart-tek Automated Services, Inc. (“SASI”), and Brian Bonar (“Bonar”), a director of the Company.
Pursuant to the terms of the marketing agreement, Bonar agreed to provide certain services to SASI to promote and market the business of SASI to prospective clients, in consideration of which SASI agreed to pay Bonar a commission consisting of the following: (i) for every US$1,000,000 in annualized gross sales of SASI up to the first US$25,000,000 in annualized sales introduced by Bonar, Bonar will receive 1,800,000 shares of common stock of the Company up to a maximum of 45,000,000 shares of Company’s common stock; and (ii) after an aggregated US$25,000,000 in annualized gross sales by SASI resulting from sales introduced by Bonar, Bonar will receive one percent of annualized gross revenues of SASI for the amounts in excess of US$5,000,000 of annualized gross sales in any given fiscal year payable in cash. The agreement is for an indefinite term and may be terminated by either party without cause on 30 days written notice.
F-16
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
13. Concentrations of risk
At December 31, 2009, two customers accounted for 40% (2008 – three significant customers accounted for 43%) of trade accounts receivable.
For the period ended December 31, 2009, two significant customers accounted for 21% (2008 – one significant customer accounted for 10%) of revenue and one of the customers individually accounted for more than 10% of revenue.
For the period ended December 31, 2009, three significant suppliers accounted for 26% (2008 – three significant suppliers accounted for 35%) of purchases.
For the period ended December 31, 2009, 100% of the Company’s sales and accounts receivable arose from sales to Canadian customers.
F-17
APPENDIX D
JUNE 2009 FORM 10K
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To: | The Board of Directors and Shareholders |
Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. (formerly Royce Biomedical Inc.) |
I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations and changes in stockholders’ deficiency and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on my audit.
I conducted my audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. My audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but do not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, I express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and cash flows for years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses until the latest fiscal year. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company generated a net income of $20,891 and a negative cash flow from operations of $3,092 during the year ended June 30, 2009, and a working capital deficiency of $1,151,444 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $685,011 at June 30, 2009. This raises substantive doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ John Kinross-Kennedy
John Kinross-Kennedy
Certified Public Accountant
Irvine, California
October 10, 2009
F-1
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of June 30, 2009 and 2008
2009 | 2008 | |||||
Assets | ||||||
Current assets | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 73,272 | $ | 51,245 | ||
Accounts receivable | 639,284 | 597,539 | ||||
Contract retention receivable | 235,196 | 226,722 | ||||
Cost of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings | 37,097 | 51,587 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and deposits | 1,376 | 1,569 | ||||
Total current assets | 986,225 | 928,662 | ||||
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation | 15,122 | 2,747 | ||||
Goodwill | 451,311 | 451,311 | ||||
$ | 1,452,658 | $ | 1,382,720 | |||
Liabilities | ||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||
Bank overdraft | $ | - | $ | 87,984 | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 408,365 | 979,694 | ||||
Bonus payable | 240,744 | 253,021 | ||||
Billings on uncompleted contracts | ||||||
in excess of costs and estimated revenues | 297,600 | 254,254 | ||||
Deferred revenue | 12,389 | 13,667 | ||||
Loans payable | 310,265 | - | ||||
Shareholder loans | 468,134 | 81,477 | ||||
Amounts due to officers and directors | 400,172 | 504,871 | ||||
Total current liabilities | 2,137,669 | 2,174,968 | ||||
Stockholders’ Deficiency | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares | ||||||
authorized, one (1) shares of Class A preferred | ||||||
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 | - | - | ||||
Common stock: $0.001 par value, 500,000,000, shares | ||||||
authorized, | ||||||
447,589 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and | ||||||
447,589 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 respectively | 448 | 448 | ||||
Additional paid in capital | 6,566,464 | 6,533,964 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (67,722 | ) | (121,568 | ) | ||
Accumulated deficit | (7,184,201 | ) | (7,205,092 | ) | ||
Total stockholders’ deficiency | (685,011 | ) | (792,248 | ) | ||
$ | 1,452,658 | $ | 1,382,720 | |||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
For the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
2009 | 2008 | |||||
Revenue | ||||||
Contract revenue | $ | 3,184,401 | $ | 3,610,980 | ||
Services revenue | 88,310 | 147,624 | ||||
Other revenue | 1,428 | 6,643 | ||||
Total revenue | 3,274,139 | 3,765,247 | ||||
Cost of revenue and service delivery | 2,558,706 | 2,929,110 | ||||
Gross profit | 715,433 | 836,137 | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 807,250 | 3,833,493 | ||||
Operating loss | (91,817 | ) | (2,997,356 | ) | ||
Other expense | ||||||
Interest | (44,549 | ) | (62,272 | ) | ||
Settlement of debt | 157,257 | - | ||||
Net income (loss) | 20,891 | (3,059,628 | ) | |||
Currency translation adjustment | 53,846 | (17,859 | ) | |||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 74,737 | $ | (3,077,487 | ) | |
Loss per share, basic and diluted | $ | 0.17 | $ | (8.80 | ) | |
Weighted average shares outstanding, | ||||||
basic and diluted | 447,589 | 349,671 |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency |
For the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 |
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||
Paid in | Comprehensive | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Income | Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance – June 30, 2007 | 293,349 | $ | 294 | $ | 2,934,520 | $ | (103,709 | ) | $ | (4,145,464 | ) | $ | (1,314,359 | ) | ||||
Fair Value Options issued to employees | - | - | 65,000 | - | - | 65,000 | ||||||||||||
Shares issued for consulting | 76,000 | 76 | 2,849,924 | - | - | 2,850,000 | ||||||||||||
Shares issued for settlement of debt | 78,240 | 78 | 684,520 | - | - | 684,598 | ||||||||||||
Net Loss | - | - | - | - | (3,059,628 | ) | (3,059,628 | ) | ||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment | - | - | - | (17,859 | ) | - | (17,859 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance – June 30, 2008 | 447,589 | $ | 448 | $ | 6,533,964 | $ | (121,568 | ) | $ | (7,205,092 | ) | $ | (792,248 | ) | ||||
Fair Value Options issued to employees | - | - | 32,500 | - | - | 32,500 | ||||||||||||
Net Loss | - | - | - | - | 20,891 | 20,891 | ||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment | - | - | - | 53,846 | - | 53,846 | ||||||||||||
Balance – June 30, 2009 | 447,589 | $ | 448 | $ | 6,566,464 | $ | (67,722 | ) | $ | (7,184,201 | ) | $ | (685,011 | ) |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
2009 | 2008 | |||||
Operating activities | ||||||
Net loss | $ | 20,891 | $ | (3,059,628 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in | ||||||
operating activities | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,258 | 5,058 | ||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | 32,500 | 65,000 | ||||
Common stock issued for consulting fees | - | 2,850,000 | ||||
Settlement of debt | (157,257 | ) | - | |||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | ||||||
Accounts receivable | (41,745 | ) | 119,314 | |||
Contract retention receivable | (8,474 | ) | (40,626 | ) | ||
Costs of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings | 14,490 | (1,667 | ) | |||
Prepaid expenses and deposits | 193 | 383 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 104,261 | 35,020 | ||||
Bonus payable | (12,277 | ) | 83,753 | |||
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs | ||||||
and estimated revenues | 43,346 | (230,835 | ) | |||
Deferred revenue | (1,278 | ) | 664 | |||
Net cash used in operating activities | (3,092 | ) | (173,564 | ) | ||
Investing activities | ||||||
Purchase of equipment | (14,633 | ) | - | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (14,633 | ) | - | |||
Financing activities | ||||||
(Decrease) Increase in bank overdraft, net | (87,984 | ) | (60,191 | ) | ||
Proceeds from shareholders loan | 79,288 | 140,722 | ||||
Proceeds from officer and directors | (5,398 | ) | 121,353 | |||
Proceeds from (repayment) of related party debt | - | (6,235 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by financing activities | (14,094 | ) | 195,649 | |||
Effects of exchange rates on cash | 53,846 | (17,859 | ) | |||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 22,027 | 4,226 | ||||
Cash, beginning of period | 51,245 | 47,019 | ||||
Cash, end of period | $ | 73,272 | $ | 51,245 | ||
Supplemental cash flow information | ||||||
Interest paid | $ | 4,382 | $ | 62,272 | ||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
Nature of operations, basis of financial statement presentation
In August 2005, the Company changed its name from Royce Biomedical Inc. to Smart-tek Solutions Inc. (“STS” or the “Company”) to better reflect its new business activities. STS was incorporated in Nevada on March 22, 1995.
Between August 1995 and June 1998, the Company manufactured and sold diagnostic test kits used to detect pregnancy, thyroid disorders and other medical conditions. The Company assembled its diagnostic testing kits at its laboratory in Irvine, California. The Company closed this facility in April 1998. In order to penetrate the Chinese Immunodiagnostic market quickly, the Company signed an agreement in April 1999 with Xili Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. (“Xili”) of the People’s Republic of China, to market and distribute H. Pylori Diagnostic test kits supplied by the Company. In addition to supplying H. Pylori diagnostic test kits supplied by the Company. In addition to supplying H. Pylori test kits to Xili, the Company had provided clinical data and training to Xili personnel.
Xili Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. through its subsidiary, Xili USA, Inc. owned approximately 44% of the outstanding common shares of the Company through December 5, 2004 and is controlled by Dr. Yan Xiao Wen, who is also the former Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. At December 31, 2007, Xili USA, Inc., owns approximately 2.1% of the outstanding common shares of the Company.
In March 2005, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent to acquire Smart-tek Communications, Inc. (“SCI”) a British Columbia based security design and installation contractor. Pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement executed in April 2005. SCI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. As a result of this acquisition, the Company has ceased all ongoing business relationships with Xili and will direct its efforts to effectively operate and expand in the security sector.
Pursuant to the share exchange agreement, the Company issued 1,000 shares of its common stock and 1 share of Class A preferred stock in return for all outstanding shares of SCI. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase (see Note 2).
Smart-tek Communications Inc. (“SCI”) was incorporated on October 29, 1996 in the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Company specializes in the design, sale, installation and service of security technology with electronic hardware and software products. Projects range from residential and commercial developments to system upgrades and monitoring contracts. Customers include major developers, general and electrical contractors, hospitals, Crown Corporations, law enforcement agencies and retail facilities. Currently, 100% of the Company’s operations are in Canada.
On February 11, 2009, Smart-tek Automated Services Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada. Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. will provide integrated and cost-effective management solutions in the area of human resources for public and private companies.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the following significant accounting policies:
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Smart-tek Solutions Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Smart-tek Communications Inc. and Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. Significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Accounts Receivable
The Company reports accounts receivable at net realizable value. The Company’s term of sale provide the basis for when accounts become delinquent or past due. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts, when necessary, equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. There is an allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2009 of $3,871 (2008 – $8,890).
F-6
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
Equipment
Equipment, including computer equipment under capital lease agreements, is recorded at cost and depreciated using accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from 3 to 5 years. The Company reviews the carrying value of long-term assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant such a review. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred. Major overhaul that extends the useful life of existing assets is capitalized. When equipment is retired or disposed, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated and the resulting profit or loss is recognized in income.
Financial instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, contract retention receivable, bank overdraft, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, amounts due to officers and directors, shareholder loans and related party loans. The fair value of these financial instruments approximate their carrying value due to the short maturities of these instruments, unless otherwise noted.
Interest rate risk arises on the various rates at which the Company has obtained certain long-term debt and related party loans. However, the Company expects to repay these obligations in full either at maturity or at terms set out in the specific agreements. Consequently, risk related to fluctuations on the bank prime is minimal. The remaining balance of long-term debt, obligations under capital lease and amount due to related parties are based on fixed terms of interest. The Company expects to repay these amounts in full, thereby minimizing interest rate risk.
Cash and equivalents
Cash and equivalents include investments with initial maturities of three months or less.
Income taxes
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes, including recognition of deferred tax assets for the anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement amounts and their respective tax bases. The Company reviews its deferred tax asset for recovery and a valuation allowance is established when the Company believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the Company’s tax provision in the period of change.
Goodwill and intangible assets
The Company accounts for goodwill and intangible assets pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Under SFAS 142, intangibles with definite lives continue to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or contractual terms. Goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated at least annually for impairment by comparing the asset’s estimated fair values with its carrying value, based on cash flow methodology.
Use of estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Specific areas, among others, requiring the application of management’s estimates and judgment includes assumptions pertaining to credit. Worthiness of customers, percentage of completion and related costs for contracts in progress, interest rates, useful lives of assets, future cost trends, tax strategies, and other external market and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from estimates and assumptions made.
F-7
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
Revenue recognition
The Company accounts for its construction projects using the percentage of completion method, measured using the cost-to-cost method. This method of accounting requires a calculation of job profit to be recognized in each reporting period for each contract abased upon estimates of future outcomes, which include:
- Estimates of total cost to complete the contract;
- Estimates of contract schedule and completion date;
- Estimates of the percentage the contract is complete; and
- Amounts of any probable unapproved claims and change orders included in revenue.
At the outset of each contract, a detailed analysis of estimated cost to complete the contract is prepared. Periodically, evaluation of the estimated cost, claims, change orders and percentage of completion at the project level will be performed. The recording of profits and losses on long-term contracts requires an estimate of the total profit and loss over the life of each contract. This estimate requires consideration of contract revenues, change orders and claims, less cost incurred and estimated costs to complete. Anticipated losses on contracts are recorded in full in the period in which they become evident. Profits are recorded based upon the total estimated contract profit times the current percentage of completion for the contract.
When calculating the amount of total profit or loss on a long-term contract, unapproved claims are recorded as revenue when collection is deemed probable based upon the four criteria for recognizing unapproved claims under the AICPA Statement of Position 81-1 (“SOP 81-1”) Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and Certain Production Type Contracts. The Company is actively engaged in claims negotiations with customers and the success of the claims negotiations have a direct impact on the profit or loss recorded for any long-term contract. On a quarterly basis, significant contracts are reviewed. However, there are many factors that impact future costs, including but not limited to, weather, inflation, labor and community disruptions, timely availability of materials, productivity and other factors. These factors can affect the accuracy of our estimates and materially impact our future earnings.
The company also provides various other services to customers not covered under construction contracts such as equipment repairs. The revenue from the provision of these types of services is recorded once the specific job is complete.
Concentration of credit risk
Credit risk arises from the potential that a counterpart will fail to perform its obligations. The Company is exposed to credit risk related to its account receivable and contract retention receivable. The Company’s receivables are comprised of a number of debtors which minimizes the concentration of credit risk. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk associated with its accounts receivable and contract retention receivable.
Foreign currency translation
The functional currency of the Company is the United States dollar. The Company’s Canadian subsidiary’s financial statements are translated into United States dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and at average rates for the period for revenues and expenses. Resulting exchange differences are accumulated as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Comprehensive (loss) income
Comprehensive income or loss encompasses net income or loss and “other comprehensive income or loss”, which includes all other non-owner transactions and events that change shareholder’s deficiency. The Company’s other comprehensive loss reflects the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments on the translation of the financial statements from the functional currency of Canadian dollars into the reporting currency of U.S. dollars.
F-8
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
Stock-based compensation
Through December 31, 2005, the Company accounted for stock-based employee compensation in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” and complied with the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 (as modified by SFAS No.48), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, Under APB No.25 compensation expense was recorded based on difference, if any, between the fair value of the Company’s stock and the exercise price on the measurement date. The Company accounted for stock issued to non-employees in accordance with SFAS No.123, which required entities to recognize as expense over the service period the fair value of all stock based awards on the date of grant and EITF No. 96-18 “Accounting for Equity Investments that are issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”, which addressed the measurement date and recognition approach for such transactions.
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-based Payment (“SFAS No.123R”) a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation”, SFAS No.123R superseded APB Opinion No.25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amended SFAS 95 “Statement of Cash Flows” SFAS No 123R requires that the Company measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant date fair-value of the awards. The cost will be recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards.
Under this method, the Company began recognizing compensation cost for equity-based compensation for all new or modified grants after the date of adoption. The pro-forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition.
In addition, the Company now recognizes the unvested portion of the grant date fair value of awards issued prior to adoption based on the fair values previously calculated for disclosure purposes over the remaining vesting period of the outstanding options and warrants. Accordingly, the Company recognizes compensation cost for equity-based compensation for all new or modified grants issued after December 31, 2005.
The Company had two partially vested stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005 pursuant to employment agreements entered into between the Company’s and its president and vice-president. Under these agreements, the Company issued options to purchase up to 650,000 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.15 per share that vest in equal quarterly installments over a three (3) year period. The Company calculated the fair value of the options to be 195,000 using our option pricing model, of which $32,500 was recognized as expense during the year ended June 30, 2009.
In addition, commencing January 1, 2006, the Company is required to recognize the unvested portion of the grant date fair value of awards issued prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R based on the fair values previously calculated for disclosure purposes over the remaining vesting period of the outstanding stock options and warrants. At June 30, 2009, the value of the unvested options was $Nil.
Recovery of long-lived assets
The Company adopted SFAS Statement 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”). SFAS 144 requires recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts.
Advertising expenses
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred which was $1,110 for the year ended June 30, 2009.
F-9
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
Loss per share
The Company computes net earnings (loss) per common share in accordance with SFAS No. 128 “Earnings per Share” (“SFAS 128”) and SAB No. 98 (“SAB 98”). Under the provisions of SFAS 128 and SAB 98, the basic net earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) available to common stock outstanding during the period. Net earnings (loss) per share on a diluted basis is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to July 1, 2009, for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The Company believes the adoption of the delayed items of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which established general accounting standards and disclosure for subsequent events. In accordance with SFAS No. 165, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were filed.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 -- The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the single source of authoritative US generally accepted accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 168 will not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company incurred net income of $20,891 and cash flow from operations of ($3,092) during the year ended June 30, 2009, and had a working capital deficiency of $1,151,444 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $685,011. These matters raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management believes that actions are presently being taken to revise the Company’s operating results. Management believes that the Company will have adequate cash to fund anticipated needs through June 30, 2010 and beyond primarily as a result of our contract backlog. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The Company does not have any significant available credit, bank financing or other external sources of liquidity. Due to historical operating losses, the Company’s operations have not been a source of liquidity and the Company has satisfied its cash requirements through shareholder loans and deferral of salary payments to its officers. In order to obtain necessary capital, the Company may need to sell additional shares of its common stock or borrow funds from private lenders. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to secure additional financing or that it can be secured at rates acceptable to the Company. In addition, should the Company be required to either issue stock for services or to secure equity funding, due to the lack of liquidity in the market for the Company’s stock such financing would result in significant dilution to its existing shareholders.
F-10
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
2. Acquisitions
On April 15, 2005, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with Smart-tek Communications, Inc. (“SCI”) and with the sole shareholder of SCI to acquire all of the outstanding shares of SCI.
In exchange for the SCI shares, the Company issued to SCI’s shareholder, 1,000 common shares and 1 Class A Preferred Share of the Company. The preferred share will enable the holder to exercise the voting control over 40% of the Company upon issuance. The remaining 60% voting control is to be assigned to the outstanding common shares of the Company. Such preferred shares shall not be convertible, exchangeable, transferable or otherwise purchased, conveyed or redeemed at any time while outstanding during a two-year period. In addition, the voting power of such preferred share shall decrease over a two year period so as to have 20% voting control 12 months after issuance, 10% voting control over 18 months after issuance and zero voting control 24 months after issuance at which time the preferred shares will be redeemed for no consideration.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and the results of SCI’s operations beginning April 16, 2005 are included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The acquisition of assets and liabilities has been recorded at their fair market value at the date of purchase. The Company determined that the historical cost of the assets and liabilities acquired approximated their fair market values given the nature of the assets and liabilities acquired. Purchase price allocation was as follows:
Valuation of shares of common stock and preferred stock | $ | 1 | ||
Assets acquired | 276,012 | |||
Liabilities assumed | (727,324 | ) | ||
451,312 | ||||
Goodwill | $ | 451,311 |
3. Contract Retention Receivable
Under the Builder’s Lien Act (British Columbia), under which the subsidiary SCI operates, for each contract or subcontract a holdback amount is retained by the customer equal to 10% of the greater of:
(a) | The value of the work or materials as they are actually provided under contract or subcontract, and | |
(b) | The amount of any payment made on account of the contract or subcontract price. |
On the request of a contractor or subcontractor, the payment certifier must, within 10 days after the date of the request, determine whether the contract or subcontract has been completed and, if the payment certifier determines that it has been completed, the payment certifier must issue a certificate of completion.
If a certificate of completion is issued with respect to a contract or subcontract, the holdback period expires at the end of 55 days after the certificate of completion is issued.
As of June 30, 2009 and June 30 2008, contract retention receivables were $235,196 and $226,722 respectively.
F-11
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
4. Equipment
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | 2009 | Accumulated | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Depreciation | Net Book | Cost | Depreciation | Net Book | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | |||||||||||||||||
Computer equipment & software | $ | 899 | $ | 762 | $ | 137 | $ | 899 | $ | 706 | $ | 193 | ||||||
Office furniture & equipment | 13,202 | 3,885 | 9,317 | 4,727 | 2,657 | 2,070 | ||||||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 15,617 | 15,617 | - | 15,617 | 15,617 | - | ||||||||||||
Computer equipment under | ||||||||||||||||||
capital lease | 2,140 | 1,791 | 349 | 2,140 | 1,656 | 484 | ||||||||||||
Automobile | 6,158 | 839 | 5,319 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
$ | 38,016 | $ | 22,894 | $ | 15,122 | $ | 23,383 | $ | 20,636 | $ | 2,747 |
5. Bank Overdraft
At June 30, 2009, bank overdrafts covered by a revolving line of credit were $Nil. The revolving line of credit agreement is between SCI, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, and HSBC Bank of Canada. The revolving line of credit facility bears interest at the rate of prime plus 4.50% per annum, allows authorized bank overdrafts of up to $107,475 ($125,000 CDN) and is secured by a shareholder guarantee and $45,350 ($52,745 CDN) in the form of a term deposit. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had written checks of $Nil in excess of the operating line of credit.
Pursuant to the banking facility, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is required to maintain minimum equity of $85,980 (CDN$100,000). The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is not in compliance with this condition at June 30, 2009.
6. Shareholder loans
At June 30, 2009 the Company is indebted to a company controlled by the Company’s president in the amount of $468,134. The loan is unsecured, bears 7.5% interest and has no fixed terms of repayment.
7. Loans payable
At June 30, 2009, the Company has outstanding loans payable in the amount of $310,265. The loans are unsecured, bear no interest and have no fixed terms of repayment.
8. Income taxes
The Company utilizes SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Deferred income taxes are reported using the liabilities method.
Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and for carry forwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
F-12
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
8. Income taxes, continued
The Company generated a deferred tax credit through net operating loss carry forwards. As of June 30, 2009 the company had federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $6,981,146 that can be used to offset future federal income tax. The federal and state net operating losses are reduced by a valuation allowance, when, in the opinion of management, utilization is not reasonably assured. A valuation allowance of 100% has been established; based on it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax credit will not be realized.
At June 30, 2009, STS had available federal net operating loss (NOL)carry forwards of approximately $6,992,146. Under Section 382 of the internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the use of prior losses including NOLs is subject to rules if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change”. Future issuances of equity interests by us for acquisitions or the exercise of outstanding options to purchase our capital stock may result in an ownership change that is large enough for a limitation on the use of NOLs to apply. If the limitation applies, we may be unable to use a material portion of its available NOL carry forwards to reduce future taxable income. The income tax effect of temporary differences between financial and tax reporting gives rise to the deferred tax asset at June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 as follows:
2009 | 2008 | |||||
Deferred tax asset, beginning | $ | 2,409,732 | $ | 1,338,862 | ||
Benefit (provision )of current year’s operating loss carry forward | ||||||
(gain) | (7,312 | ) | 1,070,870 | |||
Deferred tax asset, ending | $ | 2,402,420 | $ | 2,409,732 | ||
Valuation allowance, beginning | $ | (2409,732 | ) | $ | (1,338,862 | ) |
Current year’s loss carry forward (provision) | 7,312 | (1,070,870 | ) | |||
Valuation allowance, ending | $ | (2,402,420 | ) | $ | (2,409,732 | ) |
Deferred tax asset, net | $ | - | $ | - | ||
Tax at blended U.S./Canadian statutory rates | (35% | ) | (35% | ) | ||
Loss carryover | 35% | 35% | ||||
Tax expense | $ | - | $ | - |
9. Common Stock
At June 30, 2009, the Company is authorized to issue:
1. 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share
2. 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share
At June 30, 2009, there are 447,589 shares of common stock outstanding.
During the period a 250 for 1 reverse split was approved for the outstanding shares of the Company. The result of the reverse split was a reduction of issued and outstanding shares from 111,812,971 to 447,589. The reverse split has been reflected in the prior year for comparative purposes.
F-13
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
9. Common Stock continued
Preferred Stock
Pursuant to the share exchange agreement dated April 15, 2005, the Company agreed to issue one share of Class A preferred stock to the sole shareholder of SCI, Perry Law. The preferred share will enable the holder to exercise the voting control of 40% of the Company upon issuance. The remaining 60% voting control is to be assigned to the outstanding common shares of the Company. Such preferred shares shall not be convertible, exchangeable, transferable or otherwise purchased, conveyed or redeemed at any time while outstanding during a two-year period. In addition, the voting power of such preferred share shall decrease over such two-year period so as to have 20% voting control 12 months after issuance, 10% voting control 18 months after issuance and zero voting control 24 months after issuance, at which time the preferred share will be redeemed by the Company for no consideration.
2005 Stock Incentive Plan
During fiscal 2005, pursuant to provisions under the plans, the Company’s Board of Directors cancelled all existing stock option and incentive plans.
The following description applies to the stock incentive plan that was subsequently adopted on May 27, 2005; 1,300,000 options have been granted under this plan as of the date of this filing.
We have reserved for issuance an aggregate of 25,000,000 shares of common stock under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. This plan is intended to encourage directors, officers, employees and consultants to acquire ownership of common stock. The opportunity so provided is intended to foster in participants a strong incentive to put forth maximum effort for our continued success and growth, to aid in retaining individuals who put forth such efforts, and to assist in attracting the best available individuals to the Company in the future.
Officers (including officers who are members of the board of directors), directors and other employees and consultants of STS and its subsidiaries will be eligible to receive options under the stock incentive plan. The committee will administer the stock incentive plan and will determine those persons to whom options will be granted, the number of options to be granted, the provisions applicable to each grant and the time periods during which the options may be exercised. No options may be granted more than ten years after the date of the adoption of the stock incentive plan.
Non-qualified stock options will be granted by the committee with an option price equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock to which the non-qualified stock option relates on the date of grant. The committee may, in its discretion, determine to price the non-qualified option at a different price. In no event may the option price with respect to an incentive stock option granted under the stock option plan be less than the fair market value of such common stock to which the incentive stock option relates on the date the incentive stock option is granted.
Each option granted under the stock incentive plan will be exercisable for a term of not more than ten years after the date of grant. Certain other restrictions will apply in connection with this plan when some awards may be exercised. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the stock incentive plan); the date on which all options outstanding under the stock incentive plan may first be exercised will be accelerated. Generally, all options terminate 90 days after a change of control.
F-14
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
9. Common Stock, continued 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, continued
At June 30, 2008, options outstanding are as follows:
Average | ||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||
Balance at July 1, 2008 | 1,300,000 | $ | 0.15 | |||
Granted | - | - | ||||
Exercised | - | - | ||||
Cancelled | - | - | ||||
Balance at June 30, 2009 | 1,300,000 | $ | 0.15 |
Additional information regarding options outstanding as of June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||
Weighted average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||
remaining | average | average | ||||
Exercise | Number | contractual life | exercise | exercise | ||
price | outstanding | (years) | price | Number | price | |
$ 0.15 | 1,300,000 | 8.00 | $ 0.15 | 1,300,000 | $ 0.15 |
The Company had two partially vested stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005 pursuant to employment agreements entered into between the Company's and its president and vice-president. Under these agreements, the Company issued options to purchase up to 650,000 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.15 per share that vest in equal quarterly installments over a three (3) year period. The Company calculated the fair value of the options to be $195,000 using an option pricing model, of which $32,500 was recognized as expense during the year ended June 30, 2009.
In addition, commencing January 1, 2006, the Company is required to recognize the unvested portion of the grant date fair value of awards issued prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R based on the fair values previously calculated for disclosure purposes over the remaining vesting period of the outstanding stock options and warrants. At June 30, 2009, the value of the unvested options was $Nil.
10. Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
2009 | 2008 | |||||
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts | $ | 1,225,215 | $ | 1,520,914 | ||
Estimated earnings | 746,096 | 1,013,756 | ||||
1,971,311 | 2,534,670 | |||||
Less: Billings to Date | (2,231,814 | ) | ( 2,737,337 | ) | ||
$ | (260,503 | ) | $ | (202,667 | ) | |
Included in accompanying balance sheets under the following captions: | ||||||
Costs of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings | 37,097 | 51,587 | ||||
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and | $ | (297,600 | ) | $ | (254,254 | ) |
estimated revenues | ||||||
$ | (260,503 | ) | $ | (202,667 | ) |
F-15
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
11. Related Party Transactions
During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary paid $401,732 in management salaries to its President and Vice president which included bonuses of $240,072 and consulting fees of $70,303. Such costs have been reflected in the accompanying statement of operations.
Amounts due to officers and directors were $400,172 as of June 30, 2009.
12. Commitments
Operating leases
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Smart-tek Communications Inc. entered into a non-cancellable operating lease for office space on March 1, 2008. Furthermore, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary is committed to operating leases for four company vehicles up to April 2014. The minimum payments required under these operating leases for each of the five years subsequent to June 30, 2009 are approximately as follows:
Year ending | |
June 30 | |
2010 | 37,008 |
2011 | 22,423 |
2012 | 17,659 |
2013 | 8,437 |
2014 | 6,679 |
Employment agreements
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Smart-tek Communications Inc. has annual employment agreements with the president and vice-president and is committed to pay each of them annual salaries of $128,970 (CDN$150,000) along with annual car allowances of $12,897 (CDN$15,000).
Marketing partner agreement
By agreement dated June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Marketing Partner Agreement with its wholly owned subsidiary, Smart-tek Automated Services, Inc. (“SASI”), and Brian Bonar (“Bonar”), a director of the Company.
Pursuant to the terms of the marketing agreement, Bonar agreed to provide certain services to SASI to promote and market the business of SASI to prospective clients, in consideration of which SASI agreed to pay Bonar a commission consisting of the following: (i) for every US$1,000,000 in annualized gross sales of SASI up to the first US$25,000,000 in annualized sales introduced by Bonar, Bonar will receive 1,800,000 shares of common stock of the Company up to a maximum of 45,000,000 shares of Company’s common stock; and (ii) after an aggregated US$25,000,000 in annualized gross sales by SASI resulting from sales introduced by Bonar, Bonar will receive one percent of annualized gross revenues of SASI for the amounts in excess of US$5,000,000 of annualized gross sales in any given fiscal year payable in cash. The agreement is for an indefinite term and may be terminated by either party without cause on 30 days written notice.
F-16
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
12. Commitments,continued
Settlement agreement
During the year, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Richardson & Patel LLP (“RP”) for unpaid legal fees. RP claimed the Company owed RP $307,257.22 as of May 31, 2009 for legal services rendered, costs advanced, and accrued interest, plus addition interest since that date and collection fees and costs. RP and the Company have agreed to a payment schedule in full settlement of the debt.
The Company shall make payments of $10,000 per month until payments in the aggregate of $200,000 have been paid to RP. The first payment shall be due and delivered to RP no later than August 1, 2009. Each subsequent payment shall be due and delivered to RP no later than the 1st of each month thereafter.
The Company has the right, but not the obligation, to pay an aggregate of $150,000 in full satisfaction of the settlement payments set forth in the prior paragraph on the condition that the full $150,000 sum is paid in good funds and delivered to RP on or before November 1, 2009.
Subsequent to June 30, 2009 Perry Law, CEO, CFO and a director of the Company, agreed to make and deliver a guarantee on any amount due or owing by the Company to Richardson & Patel LLP.
13. Legal Proceedings
On April 28, 2006, the Company has filed a complaint in the Superior Court for the State of California, against RFID, Ltd., a publicly traded company on the Pink Sheets. The Complaint alleges causes of action against RFID, Ltd., for 1) Defamation Per Se; 2) Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations; 3) Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage and 4) Unfair Competition (Violation of the California Business & Professions Code section 17200). The Complaint alleges that RFID, Ltd., who described itself as a competitor of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc., made a series of false and misleading representations about Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. and its development of its RTAC-PM system. The Complaint filed by Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. seeks monetary damages in excess of $10 million and equitable relief as a result of RFID, Ltd.’s conduct.
On May 9, 2006, the Company filed a Complaint in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada against the owners and operators of Stocklemon.com (“Stocklemon”). The Complaint alleges causes of action for (1) Defamation; (2) Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations; (3) Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage and (4) Violation of State Securities Laws. The Complaint alleges that Stocklemon made a series of provably false assertions of fact and other misleading statements concerning Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.’s financial affairs and business activities. The Complaint further alleges that Stocklemon intentionally sought to damage Plaintiff’s value, contractual relationships and expectancies via the misrepresentations and misleading statements contained in a Stocklemon report issued on or about April 4, 2006. The Complaint further alleges that Stocklemon utilized the “Report” and the untrue statements of material fact contained therein to deliberately manipulate the market for personal gain.
The Complaint filed by Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. seeks compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $100 million and equitable relief against Stocklemon. While the Company remains adamant that it was wronged and damaged by the Stocklemon report, the Company was not able to continue to afford the cost of legal actions and has temporarily suspended their legal efforts and its attorney’s have filed a petition to be removed as legal representatives of the Company in this complaint.
F-17
Smart-tek Solutions Inc. |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
June 30, 2009 |
14. Concentrations of risk
At June 30, 2009, three customers accounted for 49% (2008 – two significant customers accounted for 30%) of trade accounts receivable.
For the year ended June 30, 2009, two significant customers accounted for 26% (2008 – two significant customers accounted for 32%) of revenue and the customers individually accounted for more than 10% (2008 – 10%) of revenue.
For the year ended June 30, 2009, two significant suppliers accounted for 29% (2008 – three significant suppliers accounted for 41%) of purchases.
For the year ended June 30, 2009, 100% of the Company’s sales and accounts receivable arose from sales to Canadian customers.
15. Subsequent events
Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company issued 45,000,000 common stock of the Company to Brian Bonar, a director of the Company based on the achievement certain milestone targets for annualized sales as set out in the Marketing Partner Agreement dated June 17, 2009.
Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company issued 23,866,535 shares of common stock of the Company in settlement of debt totaling $310,265.
F-18
APPENDIX E
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS, INC.
2010 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
1. Purpose of the Plan. The purpose of the 2010 Stock Compensation Plan ("Plan") of Smart-Tek Solutions Inc., a Nevada corporation, ("Company") is to provide the Company with a means of compensating selected key employees (including officers) and directors of and consultants to the Company and its subsidiaries for their services rendered in connection with the development of Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. with shares of Common Stock of the Company.
2. Administration of the Plan. The Plan shall be administered by the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board"). 2.1 Award or Sales of shares. The Company's Board shall (a) select those key employees (including officers), directors and consultants to whom shares of the Company's Common Stock shall be awarded or sold, and (b) determine the number of shares to be awarded or sold; the time or times at which shares shall be awarded or sold; whether the shares to be awarded or sold will be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and such conditions, rights of repurchase, rights of first refusal or other transfer restrictions as the Board may determine. Each award or sale of shares under the Plan may or may not be evidenced by a written agreement between the Company and the persons to whom shares of the Company's Common Stock are awarded or sold.
2.2 Consideration for Shares. Shares of the Company's Common Stock Except as otherwise provided herein, the Option Price shall be fixed by the Committee at the time of the grant of such option and shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock at the time the option is granted. The Committee shall, in good faith, determine the fair market value of the stock (without regard to any restrictions other than a restriction which, by its terms, will never lapse) based upon a reasonable method of valuation adopted by the Committee, or such other method as may be permitted by the Code, or regulations or rulings promulgated there under. In no event shall the Option Price be less than the par value of the Shares. The Committee will use its best efforts to determine the fair market value of the Shares subject to the option, but neither the Committee nor the Company will be responsible for the payment of any tax imposed upon the participants, nor will they reimburse participants for their payment of any tax so imposed. Neither the Company, the Committee, nor any member thereof makes or shall make any representation or warranty to any participant regarding the Federal or State income tax consequences or effects of participation in the Plan.
2.3 Board Procedures. The Board from time to time may adopt such rules and regulations for carrying out the purposes of the Plan as it may deem proper and in the best interests of the Company. The Board shall keep minutes of its meetings and records of its actions. A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business by the Board. The Board may act at any time by an affirmative vote of a majority of those members voting. Such vote shall be taken at a meeting (which may be conducted in person or by any telecommunication medium) or by written consent of Board members without a meeting.
2.4 Finality of Board Action. The Board shall resolve all questions arising under the Plan. Each determination, interpretation, or other action made or taken by the Board shall be final and conclusive and binding on all persons, including, without limitation, the Company, its stockholders, the Board and each of the members of the Board.
2.5 Non-Liability of Board Members. No Board member shall be liable for any action or determination made by him in good faith with respect to the Plan or any shares of the Company's Common Stock sold or awarded under it.
2.6 Board Power to amend, Suspend, or Terminate the Plan. The Board may, from time to time, make such changes in or additions to the Plan as it may deem proper and in the best interests of the Company and its Stockholders. The Board may also suspend or terminate the Plan at any time, without notice, and in its sole discretion.
3. Shares Subject to the Plan. For purposes of the Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to sell or award up to an additional 3,000,000 shares and/or options of the Company's Common Stock, $.001 par value per share ("Common Stock").
4. Participants. All key employees (including officers) and directors of and consultants to the Company and any of its subsidiaries (sometimes referred to herein as ("participants") are eligible to participate in the Plan. A copy of this Plan shall be delivered to all participants, together with a copy of any Board resolutions authorizing the issuance of the shares and establishing the terms and conditions, if any, relating to the sale or award of such shares.
5. Rights and Obligations of Participants. The award or sale of shares of Common stock shall be conditioned upon the participant providing to the Board a written representation that, at the time of such award or sale, it is the intent of such person(s) to acquire the shares for investment only and not with a view toward distribution. The certificate for unregistered shares issued for investment shall be restricted by the Company as to transfer unless the Company receives an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the Company to the effect that such restriction is not necessary under the pertaining law. The providing of such representation and such restriction on transfer shall not, however, be required upon any person's receipt of shares of Common Stock under the Plan in the event that, at the time of award or sale, the shares shall be (i) covered by an effective and current registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and (ii) either qualified or exempt from qualification under applicable state securities laws. The Company shall, however, under no circumstances be required to sell or issue any shares under the Plan if, in the opinion of the Board, (i) the issuance of such shares would constitute a violation by the participant or the Company of any applicable law or regulation of any governmental authority, or (ii) the consent or approval of any governmental body is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the issuance of such shares.
6. Payment of Shares.
(a) The entire purchase price of shares issued under the Plan shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the time when such shares are purchased, except as provided in subsection (b) below.
(b) At the discretion of the Board, Shares may be issued under the Plan in consideration of services rendered; provided, however, that any issuance of shares under the Plan shall be in compliance with the Nevada Revised Statutes. In some cases the shares may have a cashless exercise provision.
7. Adjustments. If the outstanding Common Stock shall be hereafter increased or decreased, or changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or other securities of the Company or of another corporation, by reason of a recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization, merger, consolidation, share exchange, or other business combination in which the Company is the surviving parent corporation, stock split-up, combination of shares, or dividend or other distribution payable in capital stock or rights to acquire capital stock, appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Board in the number and kind of shares which may be granted under the Plan.
8. Tax Withholding. As a condition to the purchase or award of shares, the participant shall make such arrangements as the Board may require for the satisfaction of any federal, state, local or foreign withholding tax obligations that may arise in connection with such purchase or award.
9. Terms of the Plan.
(a) Subject to the provisions and limitations of this Plan, and subject to applicable securities, tax and other laws and regulations, options may be granted at such time or times and pursuant to such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee during the period this Plan is in effect.
(b) Each Option shall provide that it may be exercised in not less than such number of equal installments which may be cumulative between three and six in number as shall be set forth in the Stock Option Agreement for such Option, commencing from the date set forth in the Stock Option Agreement for such Option; provided, however, that no option shall be exercised in full or in part after the expiration of five (5) years from the date such option is granted for the directors and three (3) year from the date such option is granted for all others. However, if the option is granted to an individual who at the time the option is granted owns stock possessing more than ten (10%) percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or its parent or subsidiary, such option shall not be exercisable in full or in part after the expiration of three (3) years from the date such option is granted. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Stock Option Agreement between the Company and the optionee, options which have been granted to an employee will continue to be exercisable only so long as the optionee remains an employee of the Company or its parent or a subsidiary of the Company.
(c) Each Option granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by a Stock Option Agreement between the Company and the director/employee. The Committee shall initially make all decisions as to the form of Stock Option Agreement to be entered into with each optionee. All forms of Stock Option Agreement shall contain such provisions, restrictions and conditions as are not inconsistent with this Plan but need not be identical. The provisions of this Plan shall be set forth in full or incorporated by reference in each Stock Option Agreement.
(d) Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Stock Option Agreement between the Company and the employee, in the event an optionee retires or otherwise ceases to be employed by the Company or its parent or any subsidiary of the Company for any reason, including leaves of absences (other than a termination by death, permanent and total disability within the meaning of Section 22 (a) (3) of the Code, or for cause), such employee shall have the right to exercise any options which became exercisable prior to retirement or cessation of employment but only within a period of three (3) months from the date of cessation of employment (but in any event not later than the termination date of the option), after which time any unexercised portion of all outstanding options shall expire. If the optionee dies during such three-month period, the executors, administrators, legatees or distributees of the optionee's estate shall have the right to exercise such options during the remainder of such period. In no event and under no circumstances may an option be exercised by an employee (or his personal representative) after termination of the optionee's employment for cause. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 9 (d), the Stock Option Agreement between the Company and the employee may provide that upon the cessation of the employment of such employee, such employee shall have the right to exercise any options granted to the employee but only within a period of three (3) months from the date of cessation of employment (but in any event not later then the termination date of the option).
(e) In the case of an employee who becomes permanently disabled within the meaning of Section 22 (a) (3) of the Code while in the employ of the Company, or its parent or any subsidiary of the Company, any option which was exercisable on the date when such employee became disabled may be exercised within one (1) year after such employee ceases employment (but in no event later than the termination date of the option) after which time any unexercised portion of all outstanding options shall expire.
(f) In the event of the death of an optionee while in the employ of the Company, its parent or any subsidiary of the Company, the executors, administrators, legatees or distributees of the estate of the optionee shall have the right to exercise any options which became exercisable prior to the optionee's death but only within a period of three (3) months from the date of the optionee's death (but in no event later than the termination date of the option), after which time any unexercised portion of all outstanding options shall expire. In the event an option is exercised by the executors, administrators, legatees or distributee of the estate of the optionee, under Subsection (d) or (e) of this Section 9, the Company shall be under no obligation to issue Shares hereunder unless and until the Company is satisfied that the person (or persons) exercising the option is the duly appointed legal representative of the optionee's estate or the proper legatee or distributes thereof.
9.1 Effective Date. The Plan shall become effective on July 1, 2010.
9.2 Termination Date. The Plan shall terminate at Midnight on August 30, 2013, and no shares shall be awarded or sold after that time. The Plan may be suspended or terminated at any earlier time by the Board within the limitations set forth in Section 2.6.
10. Non-Exclusivity of the Plan. Nothing contained in the Plan is intended to amend, modify, or rescind any previously approved compensation plans, programs or options entered into by the Company. This Plan shall be construed to be in addition to and independent of any and all such other arrangements. The adoption of the Plan by the Board shall not be construed as creating any limitations on the power of authority of the Board to adopt, with or without stockholder approval, such additional or other compensation arrangements as the Board may from time to time deem desirable.
11. Governing Law. The Plan and all rights and obligations under it shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada.
PROXY
SPECIAL MEETING | ||||||
(the “Meeting”) | ||||||
OF SHAREHOLDERS OF | ||||||
SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS, INC. | RESOLUTIONS | |||||
(the “Corporation”) | (For full details of each item, please see the accompanying Proxy Statement) | |||||
For | Against | Abstain | ||||
TO BE HELD AT 11838 BERNARDO PLAZA CT., SUITE 240, SAN DIEGO, CA 92128, ONTHURSDAY, JUNE 10, 2010, AT 10:00 A.M. (PACIFIC TIME). The undersigned shareholder (“Registered Shareholder”) of the Corporation hereby appoints, Brian Bonar, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, or failing him, Jim Downey the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, or in the place of the foregoing, Owen Naccarato(print the name), as proxy holder for and on behalf of the Registered Shareholder with the power of substitution to attend, act and vote for and on behalf of the Registered Shareholder in respect of all matters that may properly come before the Meeting, and at every adjournment thereof, to the same extent and with the same powers as if the undersigned Registered Shareholder were present at the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof. The Registered Shareholder hereby directs the proxy holder to vote the securities of the Corporation registered in the name of the Registered Shareholder as specified herein. The Registered Shareholder hereby revokes any proxy previously given. REGISTERED SHAREHOLDER SIGN HERE: | 1. | Approve the vend-out of our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-Tek Communications Inc. to its president and founder Perry Law: | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
[ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||||
[ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||||
For | Against | Abstain | ||||
2. | ||||||
Approve the Smart-Tek Solutions 2010 Stock Compensation Plan. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |||
For | Against | Abstain | ||||
3. | ||||||
Change from a fiscal June year-end to a calendar December year end. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |||
X | ||||||
DATE SIGNED: | ||||||
THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED. | ||||||
SEE IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. |
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF PROXYThis Proxy is solicited by the Management of the Corporation.
This form of proxy (“Instrument of Proxy”)must be signedby you, the Registered Shareholder, or by your attorney duly authorized by you in writing, or, in the case of a corporation, by a duly authorized officer or representative of the Corporation; and if executed by an attorney, officer, or other duly appointed representative, the original or a notarized copy of the instrument so empowering such person, or such other documentation in support as shall be acceptable to the Chairman of the Meeting, must accompany the Instrument of Proxy.
If this Instrument of Proxy is not datedin the space provided, authority is hereby given by you, the Registered Shareholder, for the proxy holder to date this proxy seven (7) calendar days after the date on which it was mailed to you, the Registered Shareholder, by the Corporation.
A Registered Shareholder, who wishes toattendthe Meeting and vote on the resolutions in person, may simply register with the scrutineer before the Meeting begins. A Registered Shareholder who isnot able to attendthe Meeting in person but wishes to vote on the resolutions, may do the following:
- appoint one of the designated personsnamed on the Instrument of Proxy, by leaving the wording appointing a nominee as is (i.e. do not strike out the management proxyholders shown and do not complete the blank space provided for the appointment of an alternate proxyholder).Where no choice is specified by a Registered Shareholder with respectto a resolution set out in the Instrument of Proxy, a management appointee acting as a proxyholder will vote the resolution as if the Registered Shareholder hadspecified an affirmative vote.
OR
- appoint another proxyholder, who need not be a Registered Shareholder of the Corporation, to vote according to the Registered Shareholder’s instructions, by striking out the management proxyholder names shown and inserting the name of the person you wish to represent you at the meeting in the space provided for an alternate proxyholder.If nochoice is specified, the proxyholder has discretionary authority to vote as the proxyholder sees fit.
The securities represented by this Instrument of Proxy will be voted or withheld from voting in accordance with the instructions of the Registered Shareholder on any poll of a resolution that may be called for and, if the Registered Holder specifies a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the securities will be voted accordingly.If no designation in favour of or against any matter set out above is made, the management designees, if named as proxy, will vote “FOR” all matters set out herein. This form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the management designees or other persons named as proxy with respect to any amendment or variation of any of the proposals set out above or other matters which may properly come before the Meeting.
If a Registered Shareholder has submitted an Instrument of Proxy, the Registered Shareholder may still attend the Meeting and may vote in person. To do so, the Registered Shareholder must record his/her attendance with the scrutineer before the commencement of the Meeting and revoke, in writing, all prior proxies.
INSTRUCTIONS AND OPTIONS FOR VOTING:
To be represented at the Meeting, voting instructions must be DEPOSITED at the Corporation’s office, by mail or by fax, at any time up 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the Meeting. The Chair of the Meeting has the discretion to accept proxies received less than 48 hours prior to the Meeting. Proxies may be transmitted by facsimile or telecopy.
Voting by mail:
11838 BERNARDO PLAZA
CT., SUITE 240, SAN DIEGO, Attention: Brian Bonar
CA 92128,