VANDERKAM & ASSOCIATES
                               1301 TRAVIS, #1200
                                HOUSTON, TX 77002
                              (713) 547-8900 PHONE
                            (713) 547-8910 FACSIMILE

                                 August 9, 2006

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Mailstop 4561
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attn: Barbara C. Jacobs
Assistant Director

Re:      Integrated Management Information, Inc.
         Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2
         Filed August 3, 2006; File No. 333-133624

Dear Ms. Jacobs:

Your letter of July 20,  2006 has been  forwarded  to this office for  response.
Each of the numbered  responses below  corresponds  with your letter of July 20,
2006.

1.   We have  revised all of the  statements  which claim that we were listed on
     the OTC Board to state that we intend to apply for listing (see the various
     Risk Factors listed on pages 8 and 9).

2.   A provision for determination of the offering price was put into a separate
     section on page 9 as required by Item 505 Regulation S-B.

3.   The  inconsistencies  in the delivery  legends have been corrected and both
     now state 90 days.

4.   The statement  that this  registration  statement  constitutes  the initial
     public offering of Integrated  Management  Information common stock has now
     been removed from the cover page of the  Registration  Statement  and is on
     the cover page of the prospectus.

5.   Information  relating to risk factors is actually in bold.  However,  Ascii
     has the ability to show only one type of typeface. Accordingly, the version
     filed through EDGAR does not show such. However, the hardcopy does.

6.   The  paragraphs  following  the table of contents and preceding the summary
     have been moved to page 9 (after the risk factors).


7.   We have now made the disclosure consistent that he price will be $.83 until
     the  securities  are quoted on the OTC  bulletin  board and  thereafter  at
     market or negotiated prices. (page 5)

8.   The paragraph, "term of sale" has been removed in its entirety from page 5.

9.   The "boiler plate" language has been removed and the risk factors rewritten
     to make them more definitive to our organization (see pages 5 - 9)

10.  We have modified the headings to make them more germane to our company (see
     pages 5-9)

11.  After a review of the  information  at the  company,  it is my opinion that
     such does not rise to the level of market  research.  Accordingly,  we have
     changed this statement on page 6 to now state "management believes".

12.  We have added a sentence to our second  risk factor on page 6 which  states
     in excess of 40% of our  projected  near term revenue  growth is contingent
     upon sales of USVerified source and age verifification systems.

13.  We have deleted in its entirety the risk factor, our future success in part
     depends on our ability to establish strategic . . .

14.  We have  revised the risk factor  relative to patents to clarify the status
     of our patents.

15.  We have  modified our footnote  originally on page 8 which we have moved to
     page 6 to state that we may be unable to raise additional  capital which is
     necessary to continue as a going concern. We have also expanded how long we
     have adequate cash and how soon our need for additional cash arises.

16.  We have modified our risk factor on page 8 to advise the investor what risk
     there is from the investor's point of view if there is limited liquidity in
     our stock.

17.  We have added  language to both the penny stock heading and the penny stock
     text risk factor to state that it will be more  difficult and costly for an
     investor to resell their shares.

18.  We have  expanded our  discussion  on page 11 and  identified  which export
     markets  other  than Japan  continue  to be closed to US beef  exports.  In
     addition,  between the time pre-effective amendment No. 1 was filed and the
     filing of this amendment, the Japanese market has conditionally opened. (pg
     11)

19.  Our MD&A for the quarter  ended  March 31,  2006  compared to 2005 has been
     substantially expanded under selling,  general and administrative  expenses
     to include numerical  quantifications of individual items in this category.
     (page 12)


20.  We  have  quantified  the  headcount  discussed  in  selling,  general  and
     administrative expenses. (page 12)

21.  On page 13, we have  added a  paragraph  stating  as of March 31,  2006 the
     company has no off balance sheet arrangements of any type.

22.  We have  expanded the  discussion on revenues and broken down the different
     categories  into  dollar  amounts.  (page  13) 23.  We  have  substantially
     modified the second to the last  paragraph on page 12 of the  liquidity and
     capital  resources  section  which states our current cash position and our
     need for additional  cash. We have also stated that we have inadequate cash
     to cover our operations for the next 12 months.

24.  We have deleted the liquidity and capital  resources section under the year
     ended December 31, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004.

25.  We are attaching  supplemental  information  to support our position on the
     various  claims  in this  section.  We  have  deleted  from  the  text  the
     provisions stating that we are a recognized  leader,  that Merial Ltd. is a
     leading  veterinan  products  company,  and that Superior  Livestock is the
     largest.

26.  Since most of our  business  is for  services,  we do not have  significant
     suppliers.  The  only  suppliers  which  we have  are  listed  on page  19.
     Approximately 14% of our revenue is provided by the sale of hardware during
     the  year  ended  December  31,  2005.  We also  state  on page 18 under US
     Verified that we have no principal suppliers because most of our revenue is
     service  related.   What  products  we  do  purchase   (principally  cattle
     identification  ear tags),  we purchase  from  Allflex  and Digital  Angel.
     However,  there are numerous other companies  which  manufacture and market
     such ear tags. On page 21 we list our  employees  both at December 31, 2005
     and as of July 31, 2006.

27.  On page 18 we state that we have no principal suppliers. (see also response
     to question 26).

28.  On page 18, we have disclosed the current  status of U.S.  trade  relations
     with South  Korea and Canada  with  respect to Beef  Exports.  We have also
     included the position of beef exports in relationship to other countries as
     well.

29.  Beginning  on page 19 and running  through page 20, we have  included  each
     major source of revenue as a percentage of total revenue.


30.  We have deleted the "key"  reference and instead listed who are our largest
     customers. (page 20).

31.  As disclosed on page 20, no single customer  generates more than 10% of our
     revenues.

32.  We have substantially modified the competition section on page 20 and 21 to
     disclose  information on our competitors,  their products and their pricing
     as well as our  pricing  and in addition  our  estimate of their  number of
     customers.

33.  We have  disclosed  below the listing of the executive  officers on page 21
     that John and Leann Saunders are husband and wife.

34.  On page 23 we have  revised the  biography of Mr. Adam Larson to state what
     his employment has been for the past five years.

35.  On page 25 we have  modified the  executive  compensation  table to include
     Leann Saunders, Cara Gerken, Cory Weaver and Rob Cook.

36.  Certain  relationships  and  related  transactions  on page  26  have  been
     modified and put into more readable fashion per your recommendation.

37.  There were no loan agreements  between Mr. Saunders and the father of Leann
     Saunders.  We have  identified  in the  Certain  Relationships  and Related
     Transactions on page 26 the name of Ms. Saunders father.

38.  We have provided the natural person disclosure for Frontier Farm Credit and
     Potomac  Capital  Partners  in the table of selling  shareholders  and have
     listed them in footnote 3 on page 31.

39.  The headings  for the balance  sheet,  the  statement  of  operations,  the
     statement  of  stockholders'  equity  and the  statement  of cash flow were
     entered as headings in the Excel spreadsheets. When the financial schedules
     were  Edgardized,  the headers  were not  recognized.  We have  removed the
     header  information  and  manually  entered the header  information  on all
     financial statements.

40.  Paragraph 54 of SFAS 128 requires  retroactive  treatment for nominal stock
     issuances, splits, etc. that occur subsequent to period close, but prior to
     issuance of financial  statements.  Since the additional common shares were
     issued to the founders in January, 2005 (prior to issuance of the auditor's
     report),  the earnings per share  calculation  at December 31, 2004 will be
     based on the new number of shares issued, including the subsequently issued
     founders shares.


     We have  recalculated the earnings per share data for the December 31, 2004
     financial  statements.  See addition to Note 9 in the December 31, 2005 and
     2004 audited financial statements.

41.  We have reviewed the transaction  which reflected the issuance of 2,745,300
     shares  of  common  stock  for  a  total  consideration  of  $217,855.  The
     transaction was  inadvertently  described on the statement of stockholders'
     equity as shares issued as compensation - related parties.  The transaction
     actually  was an  equity  transaction  for the  exercise  of stock  options
     granted in October, 2004 and the receipt of cash in the amount of $217,855.
     We have corrected the description.

42.  Inventory  is an  immaterial  item  on  the  balance  sheet  of  Integrated
     Management Information, Inc. We have, however, prepared and included in the
     Summary of  Significant  Accounting  Policies (Note 1) a description of the
     inventory and the related required disclosures.

43.  The three for two forward stock split is disclosed as a Subsequent Event in
     Note 14. As mentioned  in the response to comment 40,  Paragraph 54 of SFAS
     128 requires  retroactive  treatment for nominal stock  issuances,  splits,
     etc. that occur  subsequent  to period close,  but prior to issuance of the
     financial  statements.  We have  recalculated  the  earnings  per  share at
     December 31, 2005 based on the new number of shares  issued,  including the
     effects of the three for two split on February 14, 2006.

44.  Cattlenetwork.com   generates   approximately  90%  of  its  revenues  from
     advertising.  Our advertising agreements do not require a minimum number of
     displays.  The  remainder  of the revenue is  generated  from  monthly fees
     earned from  subscriptions to a third party site and fees paid for a weekly
     new and trading  information  email. The fee is $12.99 per month or $99 per
     year. There are  approximately  200 paying  subscribers,  some of which pay
     monthly,  with the balance paying on an annual basis. The monthly income is
     approximately $1700. Due to the immaterial amount of subscription  revenue,
     we recognize the revenue as received. Should the subscriber income increase
     significantly, we will consider recognize the income as earned.


     The  Cattlestore.com  website does not earn fees from displaying  products.
     Income is generated through the sale of products  displayed on the website.
     EITF  99-19  requires  that  gross  revenues  generated  from  the sale are
     recognized if Integrated Management Information,  Inc. is the principal, or
     the net revenues recorded if the Company is operating as an agent. As sales
     are generated  from the  Cattlestore.com  website,  the Company  orders the
     product,  takes  title to the  product,  and the  product is shipped to the
     customer.  Therefore,  the Company records the gross revenues  generated as
     income in accordance with EITF 99-19.

45.  Revenue  from the  Integrated  Management  Information,  Inc.  US  Verified
     programs are  recognized  based on contract  terms and matching of contract
     requirements to completion of the work.

     For feed yards and packers,  the  contracts  require  completion  of a USDA
     program compliant manual, obtaining USDA approval, and training. This cycle
     is  normally  60 to 90 days.  The fee is  recognized  as  earned  using the
     Proportional  Performance  Mode since the  customer  receives  value as the
     services are performed. We have modified our Revenue Recognition disclosure
     in Note 1 to clarify the accounting (i.e. Proportional Performance Model).

46.  Integrated Management Information,  Inc. provides access to its proprietary
     web-based applications to feed yards. The information contained in the site
     is  useful  to the feed  yards in their  overall  compliance  with USDA QSA
     requirements.

     Meat packers have QSA  requirements  that are similar in nature to those of
     feed yards.  Therefore the  information  contained on the site is useful to
     meat packers in meeting these QSA requirements.

     SOP 97-2 cites the four  elements  of revenue  recognition,  including  (1)
     evidence  of  an  agreements,  (2)  delivery,  (3)  is  the  fee  fixed  or
     determinable, and (4) is collectibility probable.

     The Company charges a monthly service fee ranging from $150 to $400 for web
     - site  hosting and  maintenance  of the manual.  This income is billed and
     recognized on a monthly basis.

47.  Customers do not purchase software, and Integrated Management  Information,
     Inc. does not sell software to customers. The Company hosts a web-site that
     the feed  yards and  packers  have  access to.  The  customers  pay for the
     hosting services,  there is no sale of software.  We have modified relevant
     language to reflect "access to a proprietary web-based application".

48.  We have changed the statement of cash flows to reflect the  acquisition  of
     Cattlefeeding.com for $150,000 (cash), and a disclosure of the non-monetary
     portion represented by the seller financing in the amount of $350,000.

     We have also  modified Note 2 to reflect a  reconciliation  to the Purchase
     Price.

49.  We have expanded the  disclosures in Note 2 of the March 31, 2006 financial
     statements to provide all of the disclosures required by SFAS 123(R).

50.  We have added language under footnote 3 as to the accounting  treatment for
     the six million options issued to the founders.

51.  The power of attorney has been  clarified in the exhibit index and has been
     identified in the appropriate EDGAR document tag.

52.  The legal opinion has been modified and references to Nevada and Texas have
     been dropped.  In addition we have added additional  language regarding the
     provisions of Colorado including  statutory  provisions,  provisions of the
     Colorado  Constitution and reported judicial  decisions  interpreting those
     laws.

53.  As stated in the response to item 52, we have dropped the  reference to any
     other jurisdictions in the opinions.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions or need any further
information.



                                   Sincerely,
                                   VANDERKAM & ASSOCIATES


                                  /s/ Hank Vanderkam
                                  Hank Vanderkam