(SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP LOGO)
                              (CHINESE CHARACTERS)
                      12TH FLOOR EAST TOWER | TWIN TOWERS |
                   B-12 JIANGUOMENWAI DAJIE | BEIJING | 100022
           WWW.SHEARMAN.COM | T +86.10.5922.8000 | F +86.10.6563.6000

RESIDENT PARTNERS
Lee Edwards
Alan D. Seem
Admitted in New York

Writer's Email Address:                                        December 19, 2008
alan.seem@shearman.com
Writer's Direct Number:
Tel: +86.10.5922.8002
Fax: +86.10.6563.6002

VIA EDGAR & FACSIMILE

Mr. Juan Migone
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549-3561
Tel: +1.202.551.3312
Fax: +1.202.772.9202

RE: GUANGSHEN RAILWAY COMPANY LIMITED
    FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
    FILED JUNE 26, 2008
    FILE NO. 001-14362

Dear Mr. Migone:

     Guangshen Railway Company Limited (the "Company") has requested us to
respond to the Staff's comment letter, dated November 18, 2008, with respect to
the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007 ("Form 20-F") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") on June 26, 2008.

     The Company's responses to the Staff's comments are set forth below. The
numbered paragraphs below correspond to the numbered paragraphs of the Staff's
comment letter, which have been retyped herein in bold for your ease of
reference. Also enclosed herein as Annex A is the written acknowledgment from
the Company requested by the Staff.

 ABU DHABI | BEIJING | BRUSSELS | DUSSELDORF | FRANKFURT | HONG KONG | LONDON |
   MENLO PARK | MUNICH | NEW YORK | PARIS | ROME | SAN FRANCISCO | SAO PAULO |
             SHANGHAI | SINGAPORE | TOKYO | TORONTO | WASHINGTON, DC

   SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP IS A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ORGANIZED IN THE
   UNITED STATES UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, WHICH LAWS LIMIT THE
                         PERSONAL LIABILITY OF PARTNERS.



Page 2                                                         December 19, 2008


FORM 20-F FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

ITEM 18-FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 38-THE ACQUISITION OF THE NET ASSETS OF YANGCHENG RAILWAY, PAGE F-56

     1.   WE NOTE YOUR ASSERTION THAT, AS A RESULT OF THE DILUTION TO 41% (FROM
          67%) OF THE EQUITY INTEREST OF THE MOR IN THE GROUP IN DECEMBER 2006,
          YANGCHENG RAILWAY AND THE GROUP WERE NO LONGER UNDER COMMON CONTROL ON
          THE ACQUISITION DATE OF JANUARY 1, 2007. ACCORDING TO APPENDIX A OF
          IFRS 3, CONTROL IS DEFINED AS THE POWER TO GOVERN THE FINANCIAL AND
          OPERATING POLICIES OF AN ENTITY SO AS TO OBTAIN BENEFITS FROM ITS
          ACTIVITIES. IN THIS REGARD, DISCLOSURES THROUGHOUT YOUR FILING
          DESCRIBE THE EXTENSIVE GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF THE RAILWAY
          TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY AND THE SIGNIFICANT CONTINUING INFLUENCE OF
          THE MOR OVER YOUR POLICIES, MANAGEMENT AND AFFAIRS. WE ALSO NOTE THE
          COMPOSITION OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (SIX NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
          AND THREE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS) WAS THE SAME BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER
          THE DECEMBER 2006 OFFERING. IN ADDITION, THE CHAIRMAN OF YOUR BOARD OF
          DIRECTORS IS THE CHAIRMAN OF GRGC, A SUBSIDIARY OF THE MOR. THEREFORE,
          IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER OR NOT THERE HAS BEEN ANY SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE IN
          THE MOR'S POWER TO GOVERN YOUR FINANCIAL AND OPERATING POLICIES AFTER
          THEIR EQUITY INTEREST WAS DILUTED. PLEASE CLARIFY YOUR DISCLOSURES IN
          THIS REGARD. IN YOUR RESPONSE, PLEASE PROVIDE US WITH SPECIFIC
          EXAMPLES OF CHANGES IN THE MOR'S POWER AS A RESULT OF THE DECEMBER
          2006 OFFERING (OTHER THAN THE DILUTION OF THEIR OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN
          THE GROUP).

          The Company respectfully submits that management acknowledges the
          significance and importance of the accounting treatment relating to
          the acquisition of the railway transportation business of
          Guangzhou-Pingshi Railway from Yangcheng Railway (the "Acquisition").
          Therefore, before the completion of the Acquisition, the Company
          submitted a pre-clearance request with the Commission on the proposed
          accounting treatment (i.e., purchase accounting) under both IFRS and
          U.S. GAAP in August 2006. After several rounds of communications
          between the Company and the Staff on this matter, the Company formally
          filed a pre-clearance letter with the Commission on January 26, 2007,
          addressed to the Accounting Group--Interpretations at the Office of
          the Chief Accountant of the Commission, which letter elaborated the
          management's views on the appropriate accounting treatment to be
          adopted for the Acquisition. The Company would be happy to provide a
          copy of such letter for your reference at your request. On February 6,
          2007, the Company was informed that the Staff did not object to the
          Company's proposed use of purchase accounting for the Acquisition.

          The Company would also like to emphasize that the public railway
          transportation business operated by the Company is highly regulated on
          a nationwide basis by the MOR. After the December 2006 offering, the
          MOR is still the industry regulator for maintaining safety standards
          and service quality (as it has always been), but it is not considered
          by the management as a shareholder that has control as defined in
          Appendix A of IFRS 3. Being the regulator of a specific industry does
          not implicate that the regulator has any control (as defined in
          Appendix A of IFRS 3) over the enterprises under its regulation.



Page 3                                                         December 19, 2008


          In response to the specific comments made by the Staff, the Company
          respectfully submits the following specific examples of changes in the
          MOR's power (other than dilution of the ownership interest) as a
          result of the December 2006 offering:

          -    Based on communications made between the Company and the MOR,
               management understands that the MOR has also recognized its loss
               of control over the Company as a result of the dilution of its
               ownership interest in the Company, which is evidenced by the fact
               that the MOR excluded the Company's financial statements from its
               consolidated financial statements after the December 2006
               offering.

          -    Subsequent to the December 2006 offering, the MOR did not
               exercise any control (as defined in Appendix A of IFRS 3) over
               the Company's financial and operating policies. For example,
               according to the Articles of Association of the Company, both the
               annual budget and the profit distribution plan (which are
               substantial participating actions to evidence control exercised
               over an entity) are proposed by the management of the Company and
               are required to be approved by the shareholders. According to the
               Articles of Association of the Company, in general, the Company
               can only hold a shareholders' meeting if shareholders holding at
               least 50% of the equity interests in the Company attend the
               meeting, and an ordinary resolution at the shareholders' meeting
               must be approved by shareholders representing more than 50% of
               the voting rights represented by the shareholders present at the
               shareholders' meeting (in the case of a special resolution, it
               must be approved by more than two-thirds of the voting rights
               represented by the shareholders present at the shareholders'
               meeting). Because the MOR indirectly owns approximately 41.0% of
               the equity interests of the Company after the December 2006
               offering, it no longer has the power to hold a shareholders'
               meeting and approve the annual budget and profit distribution
               plan based on its own votes. The attendance of the shareholders
               other than the MOR are required to hold a shareholders' meeting
               and votes from these shareholders may also be required in order
               to approve the annual budget and profit distribution plan at the
               shareholders' meeting. However, prior to the December 2006
               offering, the MOR was able to control the outcomes of such
               processes due to the fact that it indirectly owned approximately
               67% of the equity interests in the Company.

          -    In addition, according to the Articles of Association of the
               Company, the election of any directors into the Board of
               Directors of the Company is also required to be approved by the
               shareholders. As described above, because the MOR now indirectly
               holds less than 50% of the equity interests in the Company, it
               cannot validly hold a shareholders' meeting by itself and cannot
               control the voting results for the election of the directors.
               However, prior to the December 2006 offering, the MOR could
               control the composition of the Board of Directors due to the fact
               that it indirectly owned approximately 67% of the equity
               interests in the Company.

          -    Subsequent to the December 2006 offering, the Company is
               responsible for its own financing arrangements. Prior to the
               December 2006 offering, the MOR provided the necessary financial
               support to the Company. Subsequent to the December 2006 offering,
               the Company has borrowed significant funds from



Page 4                                                         December 19, 2008


               various commercial banks in order to finance its capital
               expenditures, including the construction of its new railway line.
               The MOR did not provide any support or guarantee for such bank
               borrowings or any other financial support to the Company.

          Therefore, the Company continues to believe that, after the December
          2006 offering, from the perspective of the IFRS 3 application, the MOR
          no longer has control over the financial and operating policies of the
          Company, and the use of purchase accounting for the Acquisition is
          appropriate.

          Finally, in response to the Staff's request on clarifying the
          disclosure in this regard, the Company will accordingly revise the
          relevant disclosures based on the above information in future filings
          made with the Commission to better reflect the changes in the MOR's
          control over the Company.

     2.   WE NOTE YOUR DISCLOSURE REFERENCING THE ASSISTANCE OF AN INDEPENDENT
          APPRAISAL FIRM. IF YOU ELECT TO MAKE REFERENCE TO AN INDEPENDENT OR
          THIRD-PARTY VALUATION OR APPRAISAL, YOU MUST SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY THE
          APPRAISER IN YOUR REPORT. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY OR DELETE ANY SUCH
          REFERENCE FROM YOUR FILINGS. IN ADDITION, IF YOU INCORPORATE A REPORT
          WITH SUCH A REFERENCE INTO ANY REGISTRATION STATEMENT, THE APPRAISER
          MUST BE IDENTIFIED AS AN EXPERT IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND HIS
          CONSENT MUST BE FILED AS AN EXHIBIT PURSUANT TO ITEM 601(B)(23) OF
          REGULATION S-K.

          The Company respectfully submits that the appraisal performed by the
          independent appraisal firm was only one of the tasks that the Company
          had requested to be completed before the Acquisition in order to
          assist the directors of the Company to determine the fair values of
          the respective identifiable assets and liabilities and contingent
          liabilities acquired. The appraisal results were only one of the
          references used in determining the purchase price allocation for the
          Acquisition. The directors of the Company understand that it is
          management, not the external appraisal firm, that should be
          responsible for the determination of the fair values. The reference to
          the independent appraisal was made in the Form 20-F in order to
          demonstrate that the directors had taken customary steps in order to
          formulate and arrive at their final determination of the fair value.
          However, such appraisal was not in itself determinative of the
          purchase price allocation for the Acquisition. Therefore, the Company
          did not specifically identify the appraiser in the Form 20-F. The
          Company will delete such reference to the appraisal firm in any future
          filings to be made with the Commission.



Page 5                                                         December 19, 2008


                                     * * * *

     Please direct any questions concerning this letter to the undersigned at
(Tel) +86.10.5922.8002, (Fax) +86.10.6563.6002 or Mr. Wilson Chow of
PricewaterhouseCoopers, the independent auditors of the Company, at (Tel)
+86.755.8261.8886.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        /s/ Alan Seem
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alan Seem

Annex A - Written Acknowledgment

cc: Mr. David R. Humphrey, Branch Chief
        Securities and Exchange Commission

    Mr. Tang Xiangdong
    Mr. Guo Xiangdong
        Guangshen Railway Company Limited

    Mr. Wilson Chow
        PricewaterhouseCoopers



                                                                         ANNEX A

                 Statement of Guangshen Railway Company Limited

     The undersigned, on behalf of Guangshen Railway Company Limited (the
"Company"), hereby acknowledges that (i) the Company is responsible for the
adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the Company's filings, (ii) staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the Company's
filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission") from taking any action with respect to
the Company's filings, and (iii) the Company may not assert staff comments as a
defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.

                                        GUANGSHEN RAILWAY COMPANY LIMITED


                                        By: /s/ Tang Xiangdong
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Tang Xiangdong
                                        Title: Chief Accountant

Date: December 19, 2008