JBGS stock data


Investment data

Data from SEC filings
Securities sold
Number of investors


3 Nov 20
28 Jan 21
31 Dec 21


Quarter (USD) Sep 20 Jun 20 Mar 20 Sep 19
Cost of revenue
Operating income
Operating margin
Net income
Net profit margin
Cash on hand
Change in cash
Diluted EPS
Annual (USD) Dec 19 Dec 18 Dec 17
Cost of revenue
Operating income
Operating margin
Net income
Net profit margin
Cash on hand
Change in cash
Diluted EPS

Financial data from company earnings reports.

Cash burn rate (estimated) Burn method: Change in cash Burn method: Operating income/loss Burn method: FCF (opex + capex)
Last Q Avg 4Q Last Q Avg 4Q Last Q Avg 4Q
Cash on hand (at last report) 492.71M 492.71M 492.71M 492.71M 492.71M 492.71M
Cash burn (monthly) 79.44M (positive/no burn) 8.5M 820.83K (positive/no burn) (positive/no burn)
Cash used (since last report) 313.84M n/a 33.57M 3.24M n/a n/a
Cash remaining 178.87M n/a 459.14M 489.47M n/a n/a
Runway (months of cash) 2.3 n/a 54.0 596.3 n/a n/a

Beta Read what these cash burn values mean

Date Owner Security Transaction Code 10b5-1 $Price #Shares $Value #Remaining
14 Jan 21 George Laucks Xanders LTIP Units Common Shares Grant Aquire A No 0 10,959 0 251,239
14 Jan 21 David Peter Paul LTIP Units Common Shares Grant Aquire A No 0 17,984 0 442,058
14 Jan 21 Kelly William Matthew LTIP Units Common Shares Grant Aquire A No 0 21,580 0 1,215,871
82.1% owned by funds/institutions
13F holders
Current Prev Q Change
Total holders 227 242 -6.2%
Opened positions 22 36 -38.9%
Closed positions 37 44 -15.9%
Increased positions 71 79 -10.1%
Reduced positions 99 89 +11.2%
13F shares
Current Prev Q Change
Total value 4.9B 3.83B +27.9%
Total shares 108.7M 109.89M -1.1%
Total puts 29.7K 5.7K +421.1%
Total calls 7.8K 0 NEW
Total put/call ratio 3.8 Infinity NaN%
Largest owners
Shares Value Change
Vanguard 16.99M $454.2M -4.8%
BLK Blackrock 12.89M $344.58M -3.3%
TROW T. Rowe Price 9.94M $265.82M -19.0%
APG Asset Management US 7.22M $193.05M +12.2%
Centersquare Investment Management 5.09M $136.2M +9.9%
STT State Street 4.95M $132.35M -8.1%
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. 4.5M $121.65M +3.8%
Long Pond Capital 3.95M $105.75M +11.7%
V3 Capital Management 3.65M $97.52M +27.2%
Wellington Management 3.47M $92.72M +4.4%
Largest transactions
Shares Bought/sold Change
TROW T. Rowe Price 9.94M -2.33M -19.0%
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board 1.49M +1.46M +4922.6%
Vanguard 16.99M -852.4K -4.8%
APG Asset Management US 7.22M +784K +12.2%
V3 Capital Management 3.65M +778.8K +27.2%
Centersquare Investment Management 5.09M +457.04K +9.9%
Yale University 0 -440.8K EXIT
STT State Street 4.95M -437.04K -8.1%
BLK Blackrock 12.89M -435.28K -3.3%
Dimensional Fund Advisors 2.36M +428.57K +22.2%

Financial report summary

  • Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
  • Our portfolio of assets is geographically concentrated in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and submarkets therein, and particularly concentrated in National Landing, which makes us susceptible to regional and local adverse economic and other conditions such that an economic downturn affecting this area could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • If Amazon invests less than the announced amounts in National Landing or makes such investment over a longer period, our ability to achieve the benefits associated with Amazon's headquarters location in National Landing could be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on us and the market price of our common shares. Furthermore, National Landing could fail to achieve the anticipated collateral financial effect associated with Amazon's headquarters, which could have a material adverse effect on us and the market price of our common shares.
  • Capital markets and economic conditions can materially affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, as well as the value of our equity and debt securities.
  • We are exposed to risks associated with real estate development and redevelopment, such as unanticipated expenses, delays and other contingencies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • We may be unable to identify and complete acquisitions of properties that meet our criteria, which may impede our growth.
  • We may not be able to control our operating expenses, or our operating expenses may remain constant or increase, even if our revenues do not increase, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • Partnership or real estate venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on partners’ or co-venturers’ financial condition and disputes between us and our partners or co-venturers, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-let space as leases expire, or do so on favorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • We depend on major tenants in our commercial portfolio, and the bankruptcy, insolvency or inability to pay rent of any of these tenants could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • We derive a significant portion of our revenues from five of our assets.
  • We derive most of our revenues from commercial assets and are subject to risks that affect the businesses of our commercial tenants, which are generally financial, legal and other professional firms as well as the federal government and defense contractors.
  • Some of our assets depend on anchor or major retail tenants to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of, or a store closure by, one or more of these tenants.
  • Our Placemaking business model depends in significant part on a retail component, which frequently involves retail assets embedded in or adjacent to our commercial and/or multifamily assets, making us subject to risks that affect the retail environment generally, such as competition from discount and online retailers, weakness in the economy, consumer spending and the financial condition of large retail companies, any of which could adversely affect market rents for retail space and the willingness or ability of retailers to lease space in our retail assets.
  • The composition of our portfolio by asset type may change over time, which could expose us to different asset class risks than if our portfolio composition remained static.
  • We may be adversely affected by trends in the office real estate industry.
  • Increased affordability of residential homes and other competition for tenants of our multifamily properties could affect our ability to retain current residents of our multifamily properties, attract new ones or increase or maintain rents, which could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
  • Real estate is a competitive business.
  • We depend on leasing space to tenants on economically favorable terms and collecting rent from tenants who may not be able to pay.
  • We may find it necessary to make rent or other concessions and/or significant capital expenditures to improve our assets to retain and attract tenants, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • Affordable housing and tenant protection regulations may limit our ability to increase rents and pass through new or increased operating expenses to our tenants.
  • Our success depends on our senior management team whose continued service is not guaranteed, and the loss of one or more of these persons could adversely affect our ability to manage our business and to implement our growth strategies or could create a negative perception in the capital markets.
  • The actual density of our future development pipeline and/or any particular future development parcel may not be consistent with our estimated potential development density.
  • We may not be able to realize potential incremental annualized rent from our commercial, multifamily or other lease-up opportunities.
  • We may from time to time be subject to litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.
  • Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or other safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs.
  • Terrorist attacks may adversely affect the value of our assets and our ability to generate revenue.
  • Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures.
  • The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cybersecurity, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, regulatory enforcement and other legal proceedings and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
  • We have a limited history operating as an independent company, and our historical financial information is not necessarily representative of the results that we would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company and may not be a reliable indicator of our future results.
  • We could be required to indemnify Vornado for certain material tax obligations that could arise as addressed in the Tax Matters Agreement.
  • Unless Vornado and JBG SMITH were both REITs immediately after the distribution of JBG SMITH from Vornado and at all times during the two years thereafter, JBG SMITH could be required to recognize certain corporate-level gains for tax purposes.
  • Potential indemnification liabilities to Vornado pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement (the "Separation Agreement") could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • There may be undisclosed liabilities of the Vornado and JBG assets contributed to us in the Formation Transaction that might expose us to potentially large, unanticipated costs.
  • Certain of our trustees and executive officers may have actual or potential conflicts of interest because of their previous or continuing equity interest in, or positions at, Vornado or JBG, as applicable, including trustees and members of our senior management, who have an ownership interest in the JBG Legacy Funds and own carried interests in certain JBG Legacy Funds and in certain of our real estate ventures that entitles them to receive additional compensation if the fund or real estate venture achieves certain return thresholds.
  • Vornado is not required to present investments to us that satisfy our investment guidelines before pursuing such opportunities on Vornado’s behalf.
  • In connection with the Formation Transaction, Vornado agreed to indemnify us for certain pre-distribution liabilities and liabilities related to Vornado assets. However, there can be no assurance that these indemnities will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that Vornado’s ability to satisfy its indemnification obligation will not be impaired in the future.
  • Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Financing
  • We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may limit our financial and operating activities and expose us to the risk of default under our debt obligations.
  • Our debt agreements include restrictive covenants, requirements to maintain financial ratios and default provisions, which could limit our flexibility and our ability to make distributions and require us to repay the indebtedness prior to its maturity.
  • We may not be able to obtain capital to make investments.
  • High mortgage rates and/or unavailability of mortgage debt may make it difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire or retain, our net income and the amount of cash distributions we can make.
  • Mortgage debt obligations expose us to the possibility of foreclosure, which could result in the loss of our investment in a property or group of properties subject to mortgage debt.
  • Variable rate debt is subject to interest rate risk that could increase our interest expense, increase the cost to refinance and increase the cost of issuing new debt.
  • The future of the reference rate used in our existing floating rate debt instruments and hedging arrangements is uncertain, which could have an uncertain economic effect on these instruments, which could hinder our ability to maintain effective hedges and may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share market price of our common shares and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
  • We may acquire properties or portfolios of properties through tax deferred contribution transactions, which could result in shareholder dilution and limit our ability to sell or refinance such assets.
  • Real estate investments’ value and income fluctuate due to various factors.
  • It may be difficult to buy and sell real estate quickly, which may limit our flexibility.
  • Our property taxes could increase due to property tax rate changes or reassessment, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws, and environmental contamination may impair our ability to lease and/or sell real estate.
  • If we default on or fail to renew at expiration the ground leases for land on which some of our assets are located or other long-term leases, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
  • Our assets may be subject to impairment charges, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
  • Climate change may adversely affect our business.
  • Tax consequences to holders of JBG SMITH LP limited partnership units upon a sale of certain of our assets may cause the interests of our senior management to differ from your own.
  • Our declaration of trust and bylaws, the partnership agreement of our operating partnership and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control transaction that might involve a premium price for our common shares or that our shareholders otherwise believe to be in their best interest.
  • The limited partnership agreement of our operating partnership requires the approval of the limited partners with respect to certain extraordinary transactions involving JBG SMITH, which may reduce the likelihood of such transactions being consummated, even if they are in the best interests of, and have been approved by, our shareholders.
  • We may issue additional shares in a manner that could adversely affect the likelihood of takeover transactions.
  • Substantially all our assets are owned by subsidiaries. We depend on dividends and distributions from these subsidiaries. The creditors of these subsidiaries are entitled to amounts payable to them by the subsidiaries before the subsidiaries may pay any dividends or other distributions to us.
  • Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our trustees and officers are limited.
  • Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT
  • We may fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT and may be required to pay income taxes at corporate rates.
  • REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to execute our business plan.
  • Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends, which could depress the market price of our common shares if perceived as a less attractive investment.
  • The tax imposed on REITs engaging in "prohibited transactions" may limit our ability to engage in transactions that would be treated as sales for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
  • If our operating partnership failed to qualify as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would cease to qualify as a REIT and suffer other adverse consequences.
  • Our ability to provide certain services to our tenants may be limited by the REIT provisions of the Code, or we may have to provide such services through a TRS.
  • We face possible adverse changes in tax laws, which may result in an increase in our tax liability and adverse consequences to our shareholders.
  • Risks Related to Our Common Shares
  • We cannot guarantee the timing, amount, or payment of dividends on our common shares.
  • Future offerings of debt or equity securities, which would be senior to our common shares upon liquidation, and/or preferred equity securities, which may be senior to our common shares for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the per share trading price of our common shares.
  • Your percentage of ownership in our company may be diluted in the future.
  • From time to time we may seek to make one or more material acquisitions. The announcement of such a material acquisition may result in a rapid and significant decline in the price of our common shares.
Management Discussion
  • During 2019 and 2020, we sold Commerce Executive/Commerce Executive Metro Land, 1600 K Street, Vienna Retail, a 50.0% interest in the entity that owns Central Place Tower, and Metropolitan Park (collectively, the "Disposed Properties"). In December 2019, we acquired F1RST Residences.
  • Property rental revenue decreased by approximately $5.3 million, or 4.3%, to $118.7 million in 2020 from $124.0 million in 2019. The decrease was primarily due to a $9.4 million decrease related to the Disposed Properties, a $2.6 million decrease in our same-store multifamily assets due to lower occupancy and lower rents attributable to COVID-19 and a $3.1 million decrease in property rental revenue due to the deferral of rent for tenants that were placed on the cash basis of accounting and an increase in uncollectable operating lease receivables attributable to COVID-19. The decrease in property rental revenue was partially offset by a $4.8 million increase related to 4747 Bethesda Avenue and West Half, both of which were placed into service during the second half of 2019, a $2.9 million increase related to properties with spaces leased to Amazon (1800 South Bell Street and 241 18th Street South) and a $2.4 million increase related to F1RST Residences, which was acquired in December 2019.
  • Third-party real estate services revenue, including reimbursements, decreased by approximately $7.6 million, or 22.0%, to $27.0 million in 2020 from $34.6 million in 2019. The decrease was primarily due to a $4.2 million decrease in development fee income primarily related to fees from Amazon recognized during 2019, a $1.4 million decrease in reimbursements revenue, a $1.3 million decrease in asset management fees and a $1.1 million decrease in property management fees primarily due to the sale of assets within the legacy funds formerly organized by The JBG Companies (the "JBG Legacy Funds") and a $947,000 decrease in leasing fees. The decrease in third-party real estate services revenue was partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in other service revenue.
Content analysis ?
H.S. senior Avg
New words: abated, abatement, Canadian, COVID, entertainment, holder, inactive, mandated, megahertz, Pension, receipt, shortening, spectrum, temporarily, Wren
Removed: bill, Commonwealth, consulting, derived, distance, education, effectively, infrastructure, package, recapitalized, stable, station, sufficiently, walking